P. 1



# OAR Box 1252 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 50) ll-B-1 0 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 2

Printed 5/21/200811:46:01 AM Sheet 50of 184P. 2 

## A=S© = DH-i-1 © MEMORANDU

M

Date : To : From : 

# E 

# ii u 

# j Ul P — Octobe r 7 , 199 1 Davi d Markwordt , EPA/CP B 

## I $ EP AAI RDOCKE T Davi d Ocam

ban d Thoma s R . Olsen , RadiianF m M m u ^^^—-

- Subject : Revise d HONTransfe r Mode l Loading Rack s Developmen t Th e purpos e o f thi s memorandu m i s t o documen t th e developmen t o f th e mode l rack s fo r HONtransfe r an d t o describ e th e methodologyfo r generating loading rac k ven t strea m characteristics . Mode l loading rack s wer e develope d t o facilitat e th e contro l impact s analysi s fo r HONTransfer . Mode l loading rack s wer e develope d fo r tank truck s an d tank cars . Emissio nestimate s wer e calculate d base d o nth e loading rac k ven t strea mcharacteristics . Emissio nreductions , costs , increase d energyusage , an

d othe r environmenta l impact s wer e calculate d base d o na contro l devic e whic hwoul d achiev e a 9 8 percen t reductio ni nHAP emission s fo r eac hrack . Th e developmen t o f th e mode l rack s an

d mode l assignmen t procedure s ar e presente d i n Sectio n1. 0 an

d th e approac hfo r generating loading rac k ven t strea mcharacteristic s presente d i nSectio n2. 0 1. 0 MODE L LOADIN

GRAC K DEVELOPMENT Sectio n11 4 questionnaire s wer e sen t t o nin e corporation s requesting dat a o nth e loading practice s fo r HAP' s o r HAP

1-1 8 mixtures . Th e collecte d dat a wa s compile d an d analyze d t o develo p mode l loading rack s fo r tank truck s an d tank cars . Th e mode l rack s resulting fro mthi s analysi s wer e judge d b yth e EPA t o b e representativ e o f th e rang e o f practice s commonl yemploye d withi nth e syntheti c organi c chemica l manufacturing industry (SOCMI) . Du e t o th e fac t tha t th e majorit yo f th e Sectio n11 4 dat a i s classifie d a s busines s confidential , th e site-specifi c informatio n o ntransfe r operation s i s no t presente d i nthi s memorandum . lrtoetno/ htm O 1 (Is )P. 3

Th e Sectio n11 4 questionnair e response s wer e reviewe d t o develo p a relationshi p betwee nrac k siz e (numbe r o f loading arms ) an d tw o quantifiabl e loading parameters : th e numbe r o f material s loade d an

d th e tota l volume o f materia l loaded . Th e mode l rac k developmen t i s discusse d i nSectio n1.1 . Sectio n1. 2 present s th e developmen t o f th e throughpu t allocatio nfactors . Sectio n 1. 3 present s th e discussio no nmode l loading rac k assignment . 1. 1 NUMBE RAND VOLUM E O F MATERIAL S LOADE D Mode l loading rack s wer e develope d b yfirs t reviewing th e rac k siz e dependenc yo nth e numbe r o f material s loade d an d the n developin g volumetri c throughpu t constraint s t o correspond t o actua l transfe r rac k operations . Anaverag e throughpu t wa s develope d fo r eac hrac k siz e withi neac hrang e o f numbe r o f material s transferred . Tabl e 1- 1 present s th e mode l loading rack s fo r tank ca r loading operation s an d Tabl e 1- 2 present s th e mode l rack s fo r tank truc k loading operations . I norde r t o determin e th e validit yo f th e mode l tank truc k an d tank ca r loading racks , th e model s wer e applie d t o th e transfe r dat a bas e t o compar e th e predicte d numbe r o f rack s an d loading arm s t o th e reporte d numbe r o f rack s an d loading arms . Th e fina l model s ar e presente d fo r eac hrac k siz e i nTabl e 1- 1 an d Tabl e 1-2 . Overall , th e fina l model s predictio nfo r th e numbe r o f arm s reporte d i nth e Sectio n11 4 response s i s highb y approximatel y2 0 percen t an d th e numbe r o f individua l rack s i s lowb y1 0 percent . Specifically , th e numbe r o f mode l rack s predicte d wa s slightl ylowfo r facilitie s producing a larg e numbe r o f material s bu t wit ha smal l tota l materia l throughput . I naddition , fo r facilitie s producing a smal l numbe r o f material s wit hextremel ylarg e tota l materia l throughput , th e numbe r o f predicte d rack s wa s slightl ylarge r tha nth e numbe r o f rack s reported . However , fo r th e SOCM I a s a whole , th e numbe r o f

lnneoo/htaOHls )P. 4

TABL E 1-1 . HONTRANSFE RRAILCA RMODE L

Numbe r o f Chemical s Throughpu t (TP ) Rang e Loade d (IO 6 gal/yr ) 1 t o 3 0 < T P < 1 0 1 0 < T P < 4 0 4 0 < T P < 80 a 4 t o 9 0 < T P < 1 0 1 0 < T P < 2 0 2 0 < T P < 3 0 3 0 < T P < 60 b 1 0 t o 2 2 0 < T P < 3 3 < T P < 80 c > 2 3 0 < T P < 1 0 1 0 < T P < 20 d

a Fo r throughput s abov e th e maximu mvalue , ad

d 3-ar mrac k pe r 1 0 xIO 6 gal . ^Fo r throughput s abov e th e maximu mvalue , ad

d 3-ar mrac k pe r 1 0 xIO 6 gal . c Fo r throughput s abov e th e maximu mvalue , add 3-ar mrac k pe r 3 xIO 6 gal . d Fo r throughput s abov e th e maximu mvalue , ad

d 4-ar mrac k pe r 1 0 xIO 6 gal .

Lrmemo/htmOHls ) 3 LOADIN GRACK S

Numbe r o f Arm s 3 8 1 6 3 6 1 0 1 6 3 1 0 4 9 anadditiona l

anadditiona l

a nadditiona l

anadditiona lP. 5

a Fo r rac k TABL E 1-2 . Numbe r o f Chemical s Loade d 1 t o 4

5 t o 1 2

1 3 t o 2 0 > 2 1 throughput s pe r 3 xIO 6 bFo r throughput s 1-ar mrac k pe r 3 cFo r rac k dpo r rac k throughput s pe r 1 5 x10 ( throughput s pe r 1 2 x10 *

lrmemo/htmO1(Is ) HONTRANSFE RTAN K

abov e gal . Throughpu t

(IO 6 g a

th e TRUC K MODE L LOADIN GRACK S

(TP ) Rang e il/yr ) 0 < T P < 3 3 < T P 1 2 < T P 0 < T P < 1 2

< 70 a < 3. 5 3. 5 < T P < 7. 5 7. 5 < T P < 2 1 2 1 < T P 0 < T P 0 < T P 1 2 < T P maximu m abov e th e maximu

m

. 5 xIO 6 gal . abov e 5 gal . abov e 5 gal* . th e th e maximu

m maximu m

4 < 54 b

< 30 c

< 1 2 < 24 d value , value , value , value , ad

d ad d ad d ad d an

a n

an

a n Numbe r o f Arm s 1 2 4 1 2 4 6 2 3 4 additiona l 1

- additiona l additiona l 1

- additiona l 3

- -ar

m

-ar m

-ar m

i

1 1P. 6

predicte d rack s an d loading arm s fromth e model s correspond s t o a realisti c representatio no f actua l loading operation s an d practices . Whe nbot hth e predicte d numbe r o f arm s an d rack s ar e considere d together , th e numbe r o f emissio npoint s i s withi n abou t 1 0 percent . Furthe r improvemen t o f th e mode l rack s woul d requir e extensiv e plant-specifi c dat a t o b e collecte d an d incorporate d int o th e loading rac k models . Becaus e th e develope d mode l transfe r rack s ar e considere d representative , th e collectio no f additiona l informatio no ntransfe r rack s wa s deeme d unnecessary . Th e result s o f th e compariso no f mode l rack s t o actua l informatio nar e presente d i nAttachmen t A . 1. 2 Throughpu t Allocatio nFactor s Chemica l manufacturing facilitie s wer e questione d abou t th e loading practice s fo r tank truck , tank car , an d marin e vessel s i n a Sectio n11 4 survey . Follow-u p call s wer e mad e t o eac hfacilit y concerning th e percentag e o f th e tota l proces s uni t productio n capacit yfo r everyproces s uni t whic hi s transferre d b ytank truck , tank car , an d marin e vessel . Thi s informatio nwa s use d t o develo p th e differen t throughpu t allocatio nfactors . Marin e vesse l loading s ar e no t include d unde r th e HON , bu t unde r a separat e standard . Th e dat a collecte d fo r marin e vesse l loading operation s wa s include d i nth e mode l analysi s onl yt o accuratel y characteriz e th e percen t capacit ytransferre d b ytank ca r an

d tank truc k loading operations . Th e developmen t o f allocatio nfactor s whic hwer e use d t o estimat e emission s wa s performe d b ysorting th e facilitie s int o tw o groups : thos e facilitie s wit hmarin e loading an d thos e facilitie s withou t marin e loading . Facilitie s wit hmarin e loading includ e thos e facilitie s whic har e locate d i n citie s nea r a bod yo f wate r suc ha s a lake , river , o r a nocean . Fo r eac h facilit ywithi n eac hgroup , th e tota l quantit yloade d b yeac h proces s uni t t o eac hvehicl e typ e wa s summed , an d th e tota l proces s uni t productio n capacitie s wer e als o summed . Th e fractio n loade d b

yeac hvehicl e wa s calculate d b ydividing th e tota l quantit yloade d b yeac hvehicl e b

yth e tota l productio n lrmemo/htmOKls ) 5P. 7

capacity . Th e overal l allocatio nfactor s wer e the nestimate d b y averaging th e fractio nloade d fo r eac hfacilit yinclude d i n eac h group . Therefore , th e quantit yo f materia l loade d b yeac h vehicl e typ e a t a facilit ytha t i s calculate d using th e allocatio nfactor s represent s th e averag e quantit yloade d a t eac h facility . Marin e vessel s ar e include d i nthi s par t o f th e analogy , becaus e th e tank truc k an d tank ca r allocatio nfactor s fo r marin e an

d nonmarin e facilitie s ar e different . Th e quantit y use d captivel yon-sit e an d th e quantit ytransferre d b ypipelin e wer e include d i nth e tota l productio ncapacity . A s par t o f th e HONFramework , tw o scenario s wer e develope d t o represen t th e typ e o f transfe r vehicle s loaded . Scenari o on e represent s facilitie s whic hload onl ytank truck s an d tank cars . Scenari o tw o represent s facilitie s whic hload tank trucks , tank cars , an

d marin e vessels . Tabl e 1- 3 present s th e overal l allocatio n factor s fo r eac hscenario . Unde r Scenari o one , th e tank truc k allocatio nfacto r i s 2.7 8 percen t an d th e tank ca r allocatio nfacto r i s 4.2 2 percent . Unde r scenari o two , th e tank truc k allocatio n i s 4.2 8 percent , th e railca r allocatio nfacto r i s 9.7 6 percent , an d th e marin e vesse l allocatio nfacto r i s 12.9 6 percent . Marin e chemical s loade d a t marin e facilitie s us e marin e allocatio nfactors . Al l othe r chemical s us e nonmarin e allocatio n factors . Thi s include s nonmarin e chemical s transferre d a t marin e facilitie s an

d al l chemical s transferre d a t nonmarin e facilities . Amarin e chemica l i s a chemica l whic hi s potentiall ytransferre d b ymarin e vessel s an d a lis t o f thi s typ e o f chemica l wa s develope d b

yMidwes t Researc hInstitut e fo r th e EPA . Th e allocatio nfactor s fo r bot htank car s an d tank truck s a t marin e facilitie s ar e highe r tha nth e respectiv e allocatio n factor s a t nonmarin e facilities . Therefore , marin e facilitie s transfe r a highe r percentag e o f th e productio ncapacit yb ytank car s an d tank truck s tha nnonmarin e facilities . Facilitie s whic h produc e a larg e quantit yo r numbe r o f chemical s tha t requir e transportatio nar e usuall ystrategicall ylocate d nea r a waterway allowing transportatio n b ymarin e vessel s a s wel l a s tank car s lrmemo/htmOlds ) 6P. 8

an d tank trucks . Therefore , thes e facilitie s wil l als o typicall y transfe r mor e b

ytank car s an

d tank truck s tha nfacilitie s whic h ar e no t locate d nea r a waterway . Tabl e 1-3 . HONTransfe r Throughpu t Allocatio nFactor s Scenari o Tank Truc k Tank Ca r Marin e Vesse l One a 2.7 8 percen t 4.2 2 percen t N/ A Tu°4.2 8 percen t 9.7 6 percen t 12.9 6 percen t a Scenari o on e correspond s t o facilitie s whic hload tank truck s an d tank cars . b Scenari o tw o correspond s t o facilitie s whic hload tank trucks , tank cars , an

d marin e vessels . 1. 3 Mode l Loading Rac k Assignmen t Th e transfe r rac k model s ar e assigne d base d upo nth e tota l numbe r o f material s loade d a t a facilit yan d th e tota l cumulativ e throughpu t fo r eac hvehicl e typ e fro mal l produc t processes . Onc e th e numbe r o f material s loade d an d th e tota l throughpu t fo r tank truck s an

d tank car s i s determined , th e actua l numbe r o f rack s assigne d fo r eac hvehicl e typ e i s determined . Incrementa l rac k size s fo r assignmen t t o eac hrang e o f numbe r o f material s ar e liste d i nTable s 1- 1 an d 1-2 . Whe n physicall yassigning th e models , th e initia l rac k i s assigne d base d upo nth e larges t rac k possibl e fo r tha t numbe r o f material s an d cumulativ e throughput . Next , i f appropriate , additiona l rack s ar e assigne d base d upo n th e throughpu t incremen t fo r eac hmateria l rang e a s show no n Tabl e 1- 1 an

d Tabl e 1-2 . 2. 0 LOADIN

GRAC K VENT STREA

MCHARACTERISTIC S DEVELOPMENT Strea mcharacteristic s ar e necessaryfo r developing th e cos t impact s o f controlling emission s fro mtransfer s operations . Th e strea mcharacteristic s require d ar e volumetri c flo wrate , annua l hour s o f operation , molecula r weight , an d hea t content .

lrmemo/htmO1(Is )



## u mP. 9

2. 1 Loading Rac k Emissio nRat e Th e loading losse s ar e estimate d using th e ven t strea m

. . 2 0 . • . characteristics . Th e loading lose s ar e multiplie d b yth e tota l quantit yloade d (in100 0 gallons ) t o calculat e th e uncontrolle d emissions . Th e emissio nrate s ar e estimate d fo r eac hspecifi c produc t process . 2. 2 Ven t Stream

Flo wRat e Th e ven t strea

mflowrat e directe d fro mth e mode l loading rac k t o th e contro l devic e i s a functio no f th e loading rat e an d th e numbe r o f arm s loading simultaneously . From th e informatio n gathere d o n transfe r operations , th e averag e filling rat e pe r ar m fo r eac hvehicl e typ e wa s estimate d t o b e use d wit hal l tank truc k an

d tank ca r models . Fo r tank truc k racks , th e averag e filling rat e pe r armwa s 17 0 gallon s pe r minute . Fo r tank ca r racks , th e averag e filling rat e pe r ar mwa s 19 0 gallon s pe r minute . Fo r th e purpose s o f thi s analysis , al l availabl e arm s a t a facilit yar e assume d t o b e loading simultaneousl ya t th e averag e rat e pe r arm . Th e loading rac k ven t strea m flowrat e wa s estimate d b

ymultiplying th e averag e filling rat e pe r ar m time s th e numbe r o f arms : Flo wrate=(averag e filling rate)x(numbe r o f arms ) I t wa s assume d tha t th e volume o f liqui d pumpe d int o th e vehicl e wa s equa l t o th e volum e o f vapo r displace d fro mth e vehicl e an

d ther e wa s n o vapo r expansio no r contraction . 2. 3 Loading Rac k Annua l Operating Hour s B yapplying th e averag e filling rat e fo r eac hrac k typ e (tan k truc k o r tank car) , th e annua l hour s th e rac k i s i n operatio nar e estimated . Th e annua l hour s loading wa s generate d b yapplying th e filling rat e t o th e tota l quantit yo f materia l ioade d fo r th e mode l rack .

lrmemo/htmO1(Is )P.1 0

Operatin g hours=Tota l throughpu t (gallons ) x1 hou r

Averag e filling rat e (gallons ) 6 0 minute s (minute ) Th e operating hour s ar e necessaryfo r estimating operating cost s fo r th e contro l devic e whic hreduce s emission s fromth e loading operation . 2. 4 Ven t StreamMolecula r Weigh t T o estimat e contro l cost s fo r combustio ndevices , anaverag e HA P molecula r weigh t i s required . I t wa s assume d tha t th e rac k molecula r weigh t shoul d represen t a composit e molecula r weigh t o f al l HAP' s loade d a t th e loading rack . Fo r example , i f a 1-ar m tank truc k mode l i s assigne d t o a locatio nwhic hload s 4 chemicals , th e composit e molecula r weigh t wil l b e calculate d usin g th e molecula r weigh t o f eac hchemica l loaded . Using a composit e molecula r weigh t whic hconsider s al l material s loade d provide s a mor e representativ e molecula r weigh t fo r cos t estimatio ntha nusing th e molecula r weigh t fo r a singl e chemical , eve nthoughth e facilit ycanonl yload 1 o f th e 4 chemical s a t a time . I t i s assume d tha t th e resulting cos t i s representativ e fo r al l produc t processe s loading a t th e location . 2. 5 Ven t Strea

mHea t Conten t Th e composit e hea t conten t fo r th e ven t strea mwa s estimate d i nth e same manne r a s wa s use d t o estimat e th e strea mcomposit e molecula r weight . Th e natura l ga s requiremen t fo r th e combustio n contro l device s i s a functio no f th e ven t strea m hea t content . A s wit hth e cos t dependenc yo nth e ven t strea mmolecula r weight , a composit e hea t conten t i s use d becaus e th e natura l ga s requiremen t shoul d no t b e biase d higho r lowb yusing th e hea t o f combustio no f a singl e material .

lrmemo/htmO1(Is )3. 0 Reference s

1 . Memorandu

m fro mBaker , J . M . Borde n Packaging an d Industria l products , t o Markwordt , D . OAQPS/ESD/CPB . Apri l 6 , 1990 . Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n fo r th e Fayetteville , NC facility . 2 . Memorandu

mfrom Coleman , I . 0 . Hoechs t Celanes e Corporatio n Chemica l Group , t o Farmer , J . R . OAQPS/ESD . Apri l 6 , 1990 . Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n fo r th e BayCity , TX facilities ' loading operations . 3 . Memorandu

mfromZiehler , A . M . PP GIndustries , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 6 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n fo r th e Barberton , O H facilities ' loading operations . 4 . Memorandu

mfromPiercy , W . E . Hoechs t Celanes e Corporatio n Polyeste r Fil m

Division , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 9 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n fo r th e Greer , S C facility . 5 . Memorandu

mfromTakacs , L . Occidenta l Chemica l Corporation , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 9 , 1990 , Respons e t o informatio n reques t fo r th e Belle , W V an d Dee r Park , TX facilities ' loading operations . 6 . Memorandu

m fro mBerg , R . E . Borde n Chemical s an d Plastics , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 10 , 1990 , Respons e t o informatio n reques t fo r BC P ammoni a barge s an d tankcars : methano l barges , tankcars , an d trucks ; formaldehyd e tankcar s an d trucks ; viny l chlorid e tankcars ; an d UF8 5 tankcar s an d trucks . 7 . Memorandu

m fromArmstrong , H . G . Borde n Packaging an d Industria l Product s , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 10 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n fo r th e Louisville , KYfacility . 8 . Memorandu

m fromWyche , J . E . PP GIndustries , Inc. , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 11 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n o n loading operation s a t th e Lak e Charles , L A facility . 9 . Memorandu

m fromSamelson , R . J . PP GIndustries , Inc. , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 11 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n o n loading operation s a t th e Natrium , W V facility . 10 . Memorandu

m fromNewman , D . K . Vulca n Chemicals , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 17 , 1990 , Respons e t o informatio n

lrmemo/htjnOKls ) 1 0



### im imWM I

### mmmimmm»mmmmmmammmmmmmmmmMmmwmmmmam^Bmt^BammM\ui\i\iMiiiit M Ireques t fo r th e Wichita , K S an d Geismar , L

Afacilitie s loading operations . 11 . Memorandu

mfromTaranto , B . L . Exxo nChemicals , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 20 , 1990 , Respons e t o request , fo r informatio nfo r th e Bato nRouge , L Achemica l plant , plasti c plant , an

d resin s finishing plant , an d th e Baytow

nTX chemica l plant . 12 . Memorandu

mfro mSalinas , F . L . Celanes e Engineering Corporatio nChemica l Group , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 23 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio nfo r th e Bishop , TXfacilities . 13 . Memorandu

m fro mWood , R . G . Hoechs t Celanes e Corporatio n Chemica l Group , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Apri l 25 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio nfo r th e Clea r Lak e plan t i nHouston , TX . 14 . Memorandu

mfro m Gray , W . T . Unio nCarbid e Chemical s an d Plastic s Company , Inc. , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , May11 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio nfo r th e Taft , LA facility . 15 . Memorandu

mfrom Mullins , J . A . Shel l Oi l Company , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Jun e 6 , 1990 , Respons e t o informatio n reques t fo r th e Dee r Park , TXan d Norco , L

Afacilities . 16 . Memorandu

mfrom Arnold , S . L . Do wChemica l USA , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Jun e 6 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio n fo r th e facilitie s i nPlaquemine , LA ; Midland , MI ; Freeport , TX ; an d LaPorte , TX . 17 . Memorandu

mfromMikowski , E . J . Unio nCarbid e Chemical s an d Plastic s Company , t o J . R . Farmer , OAQPS/ESD , Jun e 7 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio nfo r th e TXCity , TX facility . 18 . Memorandu

mfro m Kraftchick , B . J . Exxo nChemica l Americas , t o T . R . Olsen , Radia nCorporation , Augus t 7 , 1990 , Respons e t o reques t fo r informatio nfo r th e Bato nRouge , L Afacility . 19 . Ocamb , Davi d D. , Radian , t o Markwordt , David , EPA/CPB , "Summaryo f Chemical s Potentiall yTransferre d b yMarin e Vessel. " Octobe r 3 , 1990 . 20 . U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgency . Compilatio no f Ai r Pollutio nEmissio nFactors , Volum e I : StationaryPoin t an d Are a Source s Location . EPA/AP-42 . Researc hTriangl e Park , NC . Septembe r 1985 . pp . 4.4-1-4.4-17 .

Lrmemo/htmOKls ) H

^teSgl.^.^Ui.... . .^mui^mm^^auMP.1 3 )

ATTACHMENT A

lrmemo/htmO1(Is ) 1 2P.1 4

Ho nTransfe r Mode l Rack s Verificatio n 28-Aug-9 0

3333333333X3X3333B333S3SXSB33aSSS333333333333S3333333333333333333S3333333333333333333S3333X533333 3

Plan t Designatio n and Vehicl e Typ e Questiona l r e Respons e Reporte d Rack s Arm s S3B«3»l3331333Sasa»l»3IllllS83HS383asai3S33St3aai t Plan t 1 T T Plan t 1 R C Plan t 1 Tota l Plan t 2 TT Plan t 2 R C Plan t 2 Tota l Plan t 3 TT Plan t 3 R C Plan t 3 Tota l Plan t 4 T T Plan t 4 R C Plan t 4 Tota l Plan t 5 TT Plan t 5 R C Plan t 5 Tota l Plan t 6 T T Plan t 6 R C Plan t 6 Tota l Plan t 7 T T Plan t 7 R C Plan t 7 Tota l Plan t 8 T T Plan t 8 R C Plan t 8 Tota l P I ant- 9 T T Plan t 9 RC Plant 9 Tota l Plant 1 0 T T Plant 1 0 RC Plant 1 0 Tota l 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 1 I 1 1 2 2 0 2 5 4 9 3 2 5 3 6 9 2 3 S 6 6 1 2 3

3 8

1 0 6 8 1 4 Chemica l an

d Throughpu t Preliminar y Model s Predicte d Rack s Arm s 33333333333333333 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 I 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1

. 1 2 2 4 6 8 7 4 4 131 1 16 17 4

6 1 0 2 3 5 7 2 5 3 2 8 8 13 2 22 0 6 4 8 5 4 Chemica l and

Throughpu t Fina l Model s Predicte d Rack s Arm s

4 1 8 2 2 1 1 2 4

6 1 0 2 3 5 7 3 4 4 1 9 6 1 7 0 2 1 0 1 2 Plan t 1 1 T TP.1 5

Ho nTransfe r Mode l Rack s Verificatio n 28-Aug-9 0

• 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3333 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 93333333333=3333 3

Plan t Designatio n and Vehicl e Typ e Questionair e Respons e Reporte d Rack s Arm s Chemica l and Throughpu t Preliminar yModel s Predicte d Rack s Arm s Chemica l and Throughpu t Fina l Model s Predicte d Rack s Arm s

Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plant

Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plant Plan t Plan t 1 1 R C 1 1 Tota l 1 2 T T 1 2 R C 1 2 Tota l 1 3 TT 1 3 R C 1 3 Tota l 1 4 T T 1 4 R C 1 4 Tota l 1 5 T T 1 5 R C 1 5 Tota l 1 6 T T 1 6 R C 1 6 Tota l 1 7 T T 1 7 R C 1 7 Tota l 1 8 T T 1 8 RC 1 8 Tota l 1 9 T T 1 9 RC 1 9 Tota l 2 0 T T 2 0 RC 2 0 Tota l 2 1 T T 2 1 RC 5 11 7 6 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 4 4 8 4 4 8 9 2 5 3 4 7 2 2 2 9 4 7 1 1 9 6 1 5 7 2 5 3 2 7 3 5 3

4 1 5 6 3 5 3 0 6 5 1 6 7 1 1 4 1 5 2 0 2 6 4 6 2 0 2 6 4 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 4 6 4 6 9

11 2 1 5 1 7 3 6 9 0 12 6 2 1 8 2 0 2 4 2 4 4 2 1 7 8 9 9 2 1 7 8 9 9 4 1 3 2 1 4 1 3 1 7 5 2 1 2 6 7 2 9 1

3 4 1 2 3 2 6 8 4 1 0 1 0

1 2 2 1 0 1 2 3 1 9 2 2 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 0 1 2 3 1 0 1 3 3 1 0 1 3 4 1 7 2 1 4 1 3 1 7 5 2 9 3 4 7 4 5P.1 6

Ho nTransfe r Mode l Rack s Verificatio n 28-Aug-9 0

=333S53=S33833SaS3333S33X3SS33SS3333Z.333S3=33333SS33S33S&3=333333333 3 isazssi :

Plan t Designatio n an d Vehicl e Typ e Questiona l r e Respons e Chemica l an d Throughpu t Preliminar yModel s Reporte dPredicte d Rack s Arm s Rack s Arm s 3333355333383333833333333333333533333333333333333:5333333353533333553333333333 : Chemica l and Throughpu t Fina l Model s Predicte d Rack s Arm s

Plan t 2 1 Tota l 1 1 4 2 10 3 6 1 4 52 Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t Plan t 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 6 T T R C Tota l T T R C Tota l T T R C Tota l T T R C Tota l T T 2 6 RC 2 6 Tota l

GrandTota l Tota l Excludin gOutlier s Percen t 'redlctt dExcluding Percen t Predicte dBase don 6 8 1 4 3 4 7 30 1 6 4 6 2 1 38 5 9 1 4 1 0 2 4

27 3 13 2 Outlier s Tota l 1

0 7 0 80 4 1 7 2 1 3 1 2 1 5 2 3 9 37 7 6 2 9 4 6 7 5

622 405 7

9 1 6 2 3 5 1 2 3 8 9 1 7 3 4 7

427 N/ A 15 6 1

0 4 1 5 1 5 1 7 2 2 3 1 3 1 6 1 1 4 1 5 1 6 2 1 27

102 4 N/ A 16 5 6

1 6 2 2 2 5 7 1 2 3 7 1 7 2 4 3 7 1 0

16 2 12 3 93 5 9 9

6 9 7 8 5 2 5 30 3 1 3 1 6 1 0 7 3 8 3 6 3 3 3 9

62 4 474 117 10 0

Note : Outlie r plant s ar e define das thos e wit hth e numbe r o f predicte drack s outsid e th e rang e o f plu s o r minu s 1 0 rack s o f th e tota l numbe r reporte dfor tanktruc kandrai l car .