alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |                                                                                             |                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                             |
|   | By:                                                                                    | /s/ Richard              S. Foote |
|   | Richard              S. Foote                                                                    |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

|   |                                                                                                                                                    |                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                                                                           | /s/ R.              Bradley Forth |
|   | R.              Bradley Forth                                                                                                                           |
|   | Executive                Vice President,Chief                Financial Officer andSecretary                (Principal                Financial Officer) |

----
Exhibit 31.2
                                                                    ------------

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

I, Gregory S. Fredrick, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Human Pheromone
Sciences, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material  information  relating to the registrant is made known
     to us by others within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
     which this report is being prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and  procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
     effectiveness of disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
     period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the  registrant's  internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
     reasonably  likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
     other employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
     control over financial reporting.


Date: November 9, 2005


/s/ Gregory S. Fredrick
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer


                                       16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,070,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  666,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (168,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     197,515,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,990,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             290,680,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    118,596,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    213,000
<COMMON>                                       335,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,778,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               290,680,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,433,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,334,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               136,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,954,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,099,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   413,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            686,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   686,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.01


</TABLE>
No. 65378.

#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/21401 (New York).

*399Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the papers disclosing thát the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed as untimely under section 614, Tariff Act of 1930.
Report

Submitted to the

United States Congress

by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Twenty-fifth Report to Congress on Progress Made in

Licensing and Constructing the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline

February 2018
- 2 -

Twenty-fifth Report to Congress on the Alaska Pipeline

I. Executive Summary

The Federal Energy RegulatoryCommission (Commission) submits this report 

pursuant to section 1810 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005).

1 Section 1810 

of EPAct 2005 requires that the Commission submit to Congress semi-annual reports 

describing the progress made in licensing and constructing an Alaska natural gas pipeline 

and any impediments thereto.

This report provides an update from the Commission’s Twenty-fourth Report, 

submitted in August 2017. That report highlighted the termination of Docket No. PF09-

11-000 by TransCanada Alaska Company, LLC (TC Alaska) and the Office of the 

Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects.

II. Status Report

As stated in the previous report, at TC Alaska’s request, the Commission

terminated the prefile review process for the Alaska Pipeline Project in Docket No. PF09-

11-000. The Commission staff has no progress to report.

 1 P.L. 109-58, 119 Stat. 594 (2005), 42 U.S.C § 15801 et seq.
Before the Third Division,

January 17, 1950

No. 53921.

#### Judge & Dolph, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63811-K/90480, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

November 21, 1961

No. 66219.

#### Barian Shipping Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/13051, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                   CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Integrated Process Equipment Corp.


         We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-2 of Integrated Process Equipment Corp. of our report dated August 4,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Integrated Process
Equipment Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1998, which
report appears in the June 30, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Integrated
Process Equipment Corp.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
May 5, 1999
No. 54503.

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 150229-K (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jack Ferguson, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    JACK FERGUSON                                            
|                        |  |  |  | Jack Ferguson                                                   
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SM&A
CORPROATION UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                       680
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,690
<PP&E>                                           4,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,743
<SALES>                                         26,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,927
<CGS>                                           15,665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (129)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   680
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,054
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,054
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1072 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1072

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to require applicants for 
or holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors to have in 
 effect an emergency response plan for an area within a 50-mile radius 
                            of the reactor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to require applicants for 
or holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors to have in 
 effect an emergency response plan for an area within a 50-mile radius 
                            of the reactor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Emergency Assurance Reform 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS.

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall revise its regulations 
applicable to any applicant for, or holder of, an initial or renewed 
operating license for a nuclear power reactor so that such applicant or 
holder will have to have in effect an emergency response plan for an 
area within a 50-mile radius of such reactor which provides a 
reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be 
taken in the event of a radiological emergency. In the case of a holder 
of a license for such a reactor, the Commission shall require the 
holder to provide the Commission with such a plan within 180 days of 
receiving notice of such requirement.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Stream Communications Network & Media Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officers' knowledge, that:



1.

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 28, 2005



Stan Lis



Chief Executive Officer



Date: June 28, 2005



Casey Forward



Chief Financial Officer
J~OED ST,q leS 

v e z 

~ q W, ~ o ' i e 

o= 

"IL PROSti4~\ 

ilN3TED STATES ENV6R9NMENTA1- pROT°ECTION ACEiVCY 

NisiSHiNG`ft3N, D.C. 20460 

0 E u 5 Z,,;,U 

OFFiCE OF 

AIR AND RADIATIOh! 

Dr. David C. Moody, Manager 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Dr. Moody: 

In August 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved the 

Department of Energy's (DOE) transuranic (TRU) waste characterization program for 

newly-generated, debris (S5000), solids (S3000), and soil & gravel (S4000) waste 

excavated from ARP-1 and ARP-II at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). DOE's 

November 7, 2006 letter provided five drawings that clarified the description of the areas 

identified as ARP-I and ARP-II. EPA welcomes the clarification provided by DOE 

specifying the iimits of ARP-I in Pit 4 and ARP-II in Pit 4 and Pit 6. This clarification of 

ARP-I and ARP-II does not alter EPA's August 2006 (A-98-49, II-A4-67) approval, 

whieh remains applicable to the debris, solids and soil & gravel from ARP-I in Pit 4 and 

ARP-II in Pit 4 and Pit 6. 

"I'his letter, along with drawings provided by DOE, will be added as an addendum 

to EPA's Tier I change report, A-98-49; II-A4-67, and will be plaeed in EPA's public 

dockets. 

interne±Address (UP,i) 9 N1p// ,ww1w.epa.gov 

RecyeEe6tRacpc3ab9e a Prk.nted with Vegatadie O;! 3ased:nks on 169% Pcstconsumer, Process Chiorine Free Recycled Pape; 
cc (Eiectronic Distribution): 

L. Piper, CBFO 

V. Daub, CBFO 

C. Fesmire, CBFO 

N. Castaneda, CBFO 

A. Holland, CBFO 

M. Navarette, CBFO 

D. Miehls, CBFO 

A. Pangle, CTAC 

W. Ledford, CTAC
# Den Europæiske Unions C 304A/2011

| | ISSN 1977-0871
  doi:10.3000/19770871.CA2011.304.dan |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 304A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 54. årgang15. oktober 2011 |

ISSN 1977-0871

doi:10.3000/19770871.CA2011.304.dan

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 304A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

54. årgang15. oktober 2011

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Berigtigelser |
| 2011/C 304A/01 | Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelige udvælgelsesprøver EPSO/AD/227-228-229/11 (EUT C 271 A af 14.9.2011) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

Berigtigelser

2011/C 304A/01

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelige udvælgelsesprøver EPSO/AD/227-228-229/11 (EUT C 271 A af 14.9.2011)

(EUT C 271 A af 14.9.2011)

1

OVERSIGT OVER UDVÆLGELSESPRØVER I EU-TIDENDE, C ... A-UDGAVEN

Nedenstående liste viser, hvilke udvælgelsesprøver der er offentliggjort i indeværende år.

Medmindre andet er angivet, er de pågældende EU-Tidender udkommet på alle sprog.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | (BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV) |
| 142 | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | (EN/IT/MT/SV) |
| 155 | (EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 162 | |
| 169 | (EN) |
| 177 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (BG/RO) |
| 181 | (DA) |
| 183 | (SL) |
| 185 | |
| 193 | (BG/RO) |
| 198 | (CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK) |
| 206 | (CS/ES/LV/MT/SV) |
| 208 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 221 | |
| 222 | (BG/RO) |
| 223 | |
| 229 | |
| 257 | |
| 258 | |
| 270 | |
| 271 | |
| 278 | (EN) |
| 279 | (FR) |
| 281 | (DA) |
| 284 | (DE) |
| 285 | (LT) |
| 286 | (NL) |
| 292 | (RO) |
| 294 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 303 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 304 | (DA/EN) |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

135

140

(BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV)

142

146

147

(EN/IT/MT/SV)

155

(EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

156

157

162

169

(EN)

177

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(BG/RO)

181

(DA)

183

(SL)

185

193

(BG/RO)

198

(CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK)

206

(CS/ES/LV/MT/SV)

208

(DE/EN/FR)

221

222

(BG/RO)

223

229

257

258

270

271

278

(EN)

279

(FR)

281

(DA)

284

(DE)

285

(LT)

286

(NL)

292

(RO)

294

(DE/EN/FR)

303

(DE/EN/FR)

304

(DA/EN)

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Berigtigelser

| 15.10.2011 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 304/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2011

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 304/1

---

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelige udvælgelsesprøver EPSO/AD/227-228-229/11

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 271 A af 14. september 2011
  )

(2011/C 304 A/01)

Side 7, punkt 1, Arbejdsopgaver:

I stedet for:

»bistå og rådgive Kommissionen om alle aspekter af arkiveringspolitikken og om, hvordan denne kan indarbejdes i den mere generelle politik for dokumentstyring«

læses:

»bistå og rådgive institutionen om alle aspekter af arkiveringspolitikken og om, hvordan denne kan indarbejdes i den mere generelle politik for dokumentstyring«.

---
No. 61216.

protest 296890-K (New York).

#### Rohner Gehrig Co., Inc., and Sanford Products Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of spark wheels the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Waterbury Lock & Specialty Co.*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 87, C. D. 1025), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 58411. —

protests 226771-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Walker Services & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of unconcentrated lime juice similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Walker Services*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 109, C. D. 1395), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P68/138.

protest 325587-K (New York).

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Torch Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable and that no separate value for each of said items had been returned by the appraiser, the protest was dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge to determine the separate value of the flashlights and batteries in the manner provided by law. (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d).)