alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutraceutical InternationalCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Frank W. Gay II, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ FRANK W. GAY II          |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frank W. Gay II              |   |   |
| Chairman of the Board        |   |   |
| and Chief Executive Officer  |   |   |
| Date: January 26,  2006 |   |   |

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutraceutical InternationalCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Leslie M. Brown, Jr., Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief FinancialOfficer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ LESLIE  M. BROWN, JR.                  |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Leslie M. Brown, Jr.                       |   |   |
| Senior Vice President, Finance,                 |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary |   |   |
| Date: January 26,  2006                    |   |   |

 

Signed originals of these written statements requiredby Section 906 have been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 23.2




The Board of Directors
The Kushner-Locke Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-72785, 333-80521, 333-40391, 333-10239 and 33-82942) on Form S-3 and (Nos.
333-79729, 333-63297, 33-45248 and 33-86768) on Form S-8 of The Kushner-Locke
Company of our report dated December 26, 1997, relating to the consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows of The
Kushner-Locke Company for the year ended September 30, 1997, and the related
schedule for the year ended September 30,1997, which report appears in the
September 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of The Kushner-Locke Company.

KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
December 21, 1999
Before the Third Division,

July 21, 1948

No. 52478.

protests 62285-K and 64942-K (New York).

#### Cluett Peabody *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*185Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed dpon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Before Judge Beckworth,

November 21, 1967

No. R67/119.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisement R58/26287 (Houston).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Company*, *Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized tie wire, galvanized hanger wire, galvanized wire strand, bright wire, black annealed wire, galvanized steel wire, and bright hard drawn wire in issue and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, net, packed, exclusive of inland freight and f.o.b. charges.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 111

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘October 14, 2000’’ in section 106(c) and inserting in lieu

5 thereof ‘‘October 20, 2000’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 5, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50174

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR MANUEL ARROYO-BALDERAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CV-168-5-PRM

--------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor Manuel Arroyo-Balderas pleaded guilty to a

superseding information charging him with misprision of a felony. 

Arroyo has appealed his conviction, arguing that his guilty plea

was involuntarily entered because the factual basis does not

support his guilty plea to misprision of a felony. Arroyo

concedes that this court’s review is for plain error. See United

States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en

banc).
No. 04-50174

-2-

Arroyo has not shown that the district court plainly erred

in determining that the guilty plea had a basis in fact

establishing the essential elements of the offense. The record

reflects that Arroyo understood that he was pleading guilty to

failing to disclose to an FBI agent that he knew of a violation

of 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d)(2)(A). Moreover, any error on the part of

the district court did not affect Arroyo’s substantial rights. 

Arroyo’s plea was to a substantially reduced charge after the

Government had presented its evidence and after Arroyo’s motion

for a judgment of acquittal was denied. The facts and charges

were well understood by the parties at that stage of the

proceeding. The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Document

Exhibit 10.20


THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE
CNO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE CNO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2017) (the “Plan”) is made by CNO Services, LLC (the “Company”), pursuant to action of the Company’s Manager (the “Manager”), effective January 1, 2021 (the “Effective Date”).


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan; and


WHEREAS, Section 12.2 of the Plan authorizes the Company to amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to allow participants to elect scheduled distributions be paid in annual installments of up to ten years, effective January 1, 2021 and to clarify that participants may change both the time and form of payment provided certain requirements are met;


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company under Section 12.2 of the Plan and delegated to the undersigned officer of the Company, the Plan is hereby amended:


1.Effective as of January 1, 2021, by replacing the second paragraph of Section 4.1 in its entirety with the following:


“Scheduled Distributions shall be paid (i) in the form of a lump sum payment, or (ii) solely with respect to any Annual Deferral Amount, Company Contribution Amount or Supplemental Contribution Amount contributed to the Plan on and after June 1, 2016, pursuant to either a lump sum or an Annual Installment Method of up to five years (or ten years for deferral elections or postponements effective on or after January 1, 2021), or in any combination of the two, in an amount equal to the portion of the Annual Deferral Amount, Company Contribution Amount or Supplemental Contribution Amount the Participant elected to have distributed as a Scheduled Distribution, plus amounts credited or debited in the manner provided in Section 3.9 above on that amount, calculated as of the close of business on or as soon as reasonably practicable following the date on which the Scheduled Distribution becomes payable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above provisions shall not apply to existing deferral elections in place on January 1, 2016 and shall only apply in 2016 for those individuals who became participants on or after June 1, 2016.”


2.Effective as of January 1, 2017, by replacing the first sentence of Section 4.2 in its entirety with the following:


“A Participant may elect to postpone a Scheduled Distribution described in Section 4.1 above (in both time or form and form of payment) and have such amount paid out during a 60-day period commencing immediately after an allowable alternative distribution date designated by the Participant in accordance with this Section 4.2.”


            All other provisions of the Plan remain unchanged.










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed on its behalf by the undersigned officer this 18th day of December 2020, but effective as of the dates set forth above.


						
	CNO SERVICES, LLC
		
		
	By:	/s/ Yvonne K. Franzese
	Its:	EVP, Chief Human Resources Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,479
<PP&E>                                         325,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                (64,821)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 335,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,571
<BONDS>                                        315,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    205,134
<COMMON>                                         2,932
<OTHER-SE>                                   (286,281)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   335,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               109,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (64,752)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)


</TABLE>
Soil Data SubcommitteeFY 06 Report

Jim R. Fortner, Chair

Summary of Accomplishments
        -  Purpose and responsibilities of the group
        - Coordination of soil data-related activities among Federal agencies and establishment of a mechanism for the coordinated development, use, sharing, and dissemination of soil data financed in whole or in part by Federal funds. 
        - Maintain the Soil Geographic Data Standard 
        - The overall objective of the Soil Geographic Data Standard is to standardize the names, definitions, ranges of values, and other characteristics of soil survey map attribute data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS).
        - Current Status
        - The subcommittee is in ‘inactive’ status
        - Accomplishments in 2006
        - Charter was revised to indicate the subcommittee is now composed of members of the National Cooperative Soil Survey standards committee.
        - New web page developed
        - Emerging Issues 
        - Primary challenge is to find staff time to address needed items.
        - Next Steps
        - Identify members of the NCSS standards committee that will serve as contacts for this subcommittee’s work.
        - Begin identifying parts of the Soil Geographic Data Standard that need updating.
# English

## Notice to Borrowers about Language 

**Your mortgage loan transaction is likely to be conducted in English.**The information you receive and the official documents you will sign will likely be in English.

**We want you to understand the transaction.****Translations may be available to complement the English language documents.**These documents are to help you understand the transaction.  Your lender or servicer may not be able to provide you with translation services or translated documents.

**Language assistance and resources may also be available through housing counseling agencies**approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).****You can find a list of HUD-approved housing counseling agencies at www.hud.gov/counseling. 

1. Select “housing counseling agency” near you, then select your state.

2. To locate housing counseling agencies in your area that speak your language, select “Click here to narrow your search” and select a language.  

3. Or, call HUD at 800-569-4287 for help in finding a counselor.

Information about housing counselors is also available at www.consumerfinance.gov/find-a-housing-counselor.
(Reap. Dec. 10617)

#### Frank. P. Dow Co., Inc., of L.A. *v.*United States

Entry No. 212.

(Decided November 6, 1963)

*Glad, & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The -appeal for reappraisement listed above has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court as follows:

> 1. That this appeal for reappraisement is limited to 17 Goggomobile sedans with Black Wall Tires and 13 Goggomobjle sedans with. White Wall Tires exported from West Germany on or about June 21,1959.

> 2. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after February 27,1958 and is identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521) as automobiles and tires and tubes.

> 3. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein there was no foreign, export or United States value as defined in sections 402a(e), 402a(d), or 402a (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> 4. At the time of exportation of the merchandise, involved herein the cost of production as defined in section 402a (f), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended for the *44817 Goggomobile sedans with Black Wall Tires involved herein is the nnit invoice price of $675.00 each plus .624% and the cost of production as defined by said section 402a (f) for the 13 Goggomobile sedans with White Wall Tires involved herein is the unit price of $685.00 each plus .624%.

Upon the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for determining the value of the merchandise covered by this appeal and that such values were as follows:

For the 17 Goggomobile sedans with black wall tires,, the unit invoice price of $675 each, plus 0.624 per centum, and

For the 13 Goggomobile sedans with white wall tires, the unit price of $685 each, plus 0.624 per centum.

As to all other merchandise not heretofore enumerated, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# 2019 FOIA ANNUAL REPORT-   RAW
EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Allyn P. Hebner, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K on Form 10-K/A of Motricity, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 2, 2011



/s/ Allyn P. HebnerAllyn P. HebnerChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #15-2005 (A) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK                                                                  |
| Freddie M. Kotek                                                                      |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                                                                    |
No. 58832.

protest 239486-K (New York).

#### Jos. Galkin Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-105260 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account
Ten on Form N-4, of our report dated February 19, 2003 of Hartford Life
Insurance Company relating to the financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and of our report dated February
21, 2003 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account Ten relating to
the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002,
appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such
Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings
"Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
Before the First Division,

January 18, 1946

No. 50821.

#### Protest 97505-K of Chinese Products Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The uncontradicted testimony established that certain items of the merchandise consist of ve-tsin the same in all material respects as

that passed upon in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). On the conceded facts the merchandise, which includes salt as a substantial component part thereof, was excluded from paragraph 5 and held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0342

Docket Number

2011-SW-028-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MDHelicopters Service Bulletin SB900-117, dated January 14, 2011

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NORTHERN CAMBRIA SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Petitioner

v.

NORTHERN CAMBRIA EDUCATION 

SUPPORT PROFESSIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, PSEA/NEA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 142 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Paige Johnson Seed & Agronomy LLC

Petition for Exemption (333)

Paige Johnson 1440 Ford Ave Corwith, IA 50430 paigejseed@gmail.com 515

- 408

- 6837 Seeking a 333 Exemption. This exemption will allow me to safely and legally fly my UAS and to help others. I am supplementing my business with a UAS. This technology I feel is beneficial for Iowa Growers in moving the bar in the yield category and monitoring fields. I will no t be charging a fee for this technology. This exemption would not adversely affect safety due to the parameters I will be flying my UAS in. I will be flying it 200 feet and lower, in the daylight, and will take all other safety precautions. As stated above I supplementing my business with this technology and not charging a fee for doing so. I will not to flying my UAS daily, only when needed. It will be flown in the proper conditions and done so safely.