alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20219 

Telephone: (202) 649-3800 

Facsimile: (202) 649-1071 

www.fhfa.gov 

 FHLBank System at 100 Roundtable: 

Climate Resiliency: Preparedness and Response, and Risk Management 

Considerations 

March 6, 2023 | 1:00 – 4:00 p.m.

1. What do communities need to create and support a strong supply of sustainable, affordable, 

and resilient housing? How and where can financial institutions engage in preparedness 

efforts? What role does the FHLBank System play? What role could it play? 

2. What about disaster recovery efforts? 

3. What additional support is needed in areas vulnerable to climate-related and natural 

disasters? Are the FHLBanks positioned to provide that support? 

4. Are there particular populations, market segments, or purposes where the FHLBanks may be 

uniquely positioned to play a larger role – e.g., consumer protection and education, safety 

and soundness, resiliency? Are there factors preventing the FHLBanks from playing a larger 

role? 

5. Is there a role for the FHLBank System to help address insurance challenges for property 

owners in areas vulnerable to climate-related and natural disasters? If so, what is it? If not, 

why not? 

6. How should the FHLBank System address its own exposure to climate-related and natural 

disasters; for example, in connection with collateral and mortgage purchases? 

7. If we could start from a blank slate, what would be key features of a program or product 

offered by a financial institution or the FHLBank System to support sustainable and resilient 

communities? Is there a role for pilot programs? 

To submit in advance: 

• What is the single most important change you would recommend to best position the 

System to provide support for climate resiliency and disaster recovery efforts? If no 

changes are needed, why not? 

• Do you believe structural changes to the FHLBank System (e.g., consolidation, change in 

membership) would be necessary or advisable to fulfill the role(s) you envision? Why or 

why not? 

• Other bullet points outlining the points you would like to discuss.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT REVAK and :

MARGARET REVAK : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : No. 03-4822

:

INTERFOREST TERMINAL :

UMBEA AB :

and :

WAGENBORG SHIPPING, B.V. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14 day of May, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant Wagenborg th

Shipping BV’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12, Case No. 04-4253), it is 1

ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 

R. Barclay Surrick, J.

 The actions against Interforest Terminal UMEA AB and Wagenborg Shipping BV were

1

consolidated on April 6, 2005. (See Doc. No. 35.) Wagenborg Shipping filed the instant Motion

under the pre-consolidation case number, 04-4253.

Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 55 Filed 05/14/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                                          0001050893
<NAME>                                         BOC Financial Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         171
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         42
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               8,850
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    3,482
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        17,967
<ALLOWANCE>                                    30
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,089
<DEPOSITS>                                     18,555
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            206
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       926
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 31,089
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                744
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              93
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               196
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,033
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             534
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             534
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          499
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             499
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                206
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.39
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                17
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               30
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              30
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           30
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
# ENABLING ZERO FRESH WATER WITHDRAWAL IN



# SHALE GAS OPERATIONS Vikram Rao Research Triangle Energy Consortium

March 29, 2011

## GOAL OF ZERO DISCHARGE AND ZERO WITHDRAWALS REQUIRES
• Salt Tolerance • Allows easier re- use of flowback water • Allows use of saline waters of convenience
• Addressing Potential Issues with High Salt • Scaling: can be repository for radioactive species • Divalent ions can retard efficacy of cross- linkers, friction reducers • Reservoir effects need better definition • More desalination may be needed than with fresh water make up

### SALINE WATERS OF CONVENIENCE

• Sea Water • Simplest to process • TDS average of 35000 ppm is already acceptable 

### • Saline Aquifers • Target shallow ones preferably for easy access and lower salinity • USGS has not mapped since middle of last century • Available maps show presence in many shale gas areas • Withdrawal could affect hydrology of proximal fresh bodies • Produced Water • Potentially the most challenging • But use offsets need to dispose of

### OPERATIONAL CHEMISTRY CONSIDERATIONS

• 

### TDS Tolerance • 40000 ppm tolerated today, soon 80000, maybe higher • Beneficial for clay component of shale • Optimal: balancing with connate water? 

### • Divalent Ion removal • Standard softening methods • Cost versus tolerance 

### • Other Species Needing Removal • Bacteria: how prevalent in saline aquifers? • Flowback water will need to be treated anyway • Radioactive elements if any • Other?TYPICAL MARCELLUS SALT LEVELS (ppm) Total Dissolved Solid Mg Ca Average 47,364 175 1750 Range 16,000 – 220,000 10-927 400-8600 Source: Blauch et al SPE Paper 125740, 2009

### SALINE AQUIFER CONSIDERATIONS

• 

### Needs Investigation • Location by depth and salinity • Chemical characterization • Access • For withdrawal • For return of desalination waste heavy brine • Typical distances for transport • Bacterial Content • One report: terrestrial bacteria present in three locations

## DISCUSSION

• 

## Salt Tolerance: practical upper limits • divalent ions: removal versus tolerance • if tolerated how do we handle scaling • full implications of salt tolerance 

## • Saline Aquifer Access • practicalities: depth, distance, chemistry • if feasible: USGS should produce new map 

## • Produced Water Use Issues
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Given Imaging Ltd. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge that:





(i)    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 9, 2011




/s/ Yuval Yanai


Yuval Yanai


Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 of Sinobiomed Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, George Yu, President, CEO and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 31, 2011
/s/ George YuGeorge Yu, President, CEO and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 65381.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protests 297861-K/14821, etc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10, 1955, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor more than 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D, 53877).
No. 50839.

#### Protest 120305-K of P. Lorillard Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

An examination of the record failing to find anything sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 64744.

#### Carillon Importers, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 159925-K, etc. (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FARES MUSTAFA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3290

[June 9, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Scott Suskauer, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502011CF004854A.

William Mallory Kent of Kent & McFarland Attorneys at Law, 

Jacksonville, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ.,concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 58405.

protests 144064-K, etc. (New York).

#### John H. Faunce, Inc., and R. C. A. Victor Div., Radio Corp. of America *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper record containers the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 127, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry
S. Hollander, Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
    Report.
 
 /s/ Barry S. HollanderBarry
      S. HollanderPrincipal
      Accounting OfficerDecember
      15, 2009
  A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar
Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 5
   <NAME> BELAIR CAPITAL FUND


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      2,272,347,422
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     2,479,188,542
<RECEIVABLES>                              14,739,550
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             366,343
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                       25,914,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,520,208,495
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                   0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    645,000,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  6,021,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                        651,021,948
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   1,716,881,706
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                      16,053,481
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      16,568,833
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  19,902
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    (63,089,652)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   215,374,591
<NET-ASSETS>                               1,869,186,547
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                          48,433,889
<INTEREST-INCOME>                          4,176,136
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                             47,286,935
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    5,323,090
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (8,001,500)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  2,014,396
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (664,014)
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                    0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                (515,352)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (63,661,825)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    (5,303,188)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  (55,088,152)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                      4,847,333
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         31,540,823
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                            47,286,935
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       1,997,919,000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                      116.66
<PER-SHARE-NII>                            0.334
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                    (0.564)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                       0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                  0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                       0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                        116.43
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                            3.16
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0


</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

August 26, 1946

No. 51274.

#### Protest 98751-K of Wah Shang Co. (San Francisco).

*174Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the collector’s original liquidation was taken pursuant to the decision reported in *Columbia Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 175, C. D. 395): The reliquidation was taken pursuant to instructions from the Commissioner of Customs received October 29, 1941. Inasmuch as section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, provides that liquidation in the absence of protest “upon the expiration of sixty days from the date” thereof shall be final and conclusive upon all persons, it was held that under said section the collector had no power to reliquidate after the expiration of the 60-day period. *(John S. Phipps*v. *United States,*22 C. C. P. A. 595, T. D. 47601; *McKesson Wholesale Drug Co.*v. *United States,*65 Treas. Dec. 478, T. D. 46955; and *Pacific Brokerage Co.*v. *United States,*3 Cust. Ct. 20, C. D. 193, cited.) The plaintiff’s claim was therefore sustained.
# Official Journal C 316/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.316.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 316 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5428 October 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.316.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 316

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5428 October 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 316/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2011 to 31 August 2011(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2011/C 316/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2011 to 31 August 2011(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  ) | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 316/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2011 to 31 August 2011(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2011/C 316/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 July 2011 to 31 August 2011(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC
  or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC
  )

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC

or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC

)

18

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
---

|N.C. CARTER, Ph.D., P.Eng.
|--------------------------
|Consulting Geologist      
|1410 Wende Road           
|Victoria, B.C V8P 3T5     
|Canada                    

PHONE250-477-0419 FAX250-477-0429 EMAIL NCCARTER@SHAW.CA

Consent of Author

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

I, N.C. Carter, Ph.D., P.Eng., certify that I have read the
written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that
there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical
Report or that the written disclosure in the Form 20F of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in the
Report on the 2003 Exploration Program Turnagain Nickel Project dated April
21, 2004.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory
authorities.

I consent to being an expert in the 2009 Form 20F.

Dated this 22nd day of June, 2010.

Signed

N.C. Carter, Ph.D., P.Eng.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act),
Joel V. Staff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Reliant Energy, Inc. (the Company), and Mark M. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge:



| | (a) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JOEL V.
STAFF   
|                     |  |  |  | Joel V. Staff          
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman and           
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



| |  |  |  |                             
| |  |  |  | ----------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/    MARK M.
JACOBS       
| |  |  |  | Mark M. Jacobs              
| |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and
| |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer