alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

January 15, 1948

No. 52117.

protest 120507-K (Los Angeles).

#### U. S. Rubber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that the imported merchandise is used in conjunction with other articles, not imported, in the manufacture or production of automobile tires. However, the record failed to establish that the imported merchandise is an integral, constituent, or component part without which the article to which it is to be joined could not function as such article. The evidence likewise failed to establish that the article to which the imported merchandise is to bp joined, is a machine, in and of itself. On the record presented the protest was overruled for failure of proof.
No. 57896.

#### Asheville Mica Company *v.*United States,

protests 164659-K and 164660-K (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain percentages of the merchandise consist of mica splittings not over twelve ien-thousandths of 1 inch in thickness, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained a^ij said percentages. uiiaoi
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          | /s/ Gao Ren                          |   |
|---------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:         | Gao Ren                              |   |
| Title:        | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |   |
|          |                                 |   |
| April 6, 2011 |                                 |
|          |                                 |
|          | /s/ Jodie Zheng Wehner               |   |
| Name:         |  Jodie Zheng Wehner             |   |
| Title:        | Chief Financial Officer              |   |
|          |                                 |   |
| April 6, 2011 |                                 |

----
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.42    
    


[DAVID J. TEECE LETTERHEAD]  


September 5, 2002 


Board
of Directors

LECG, LLC

2000 Powell Street, Suite 600

Emeryville, CA 94608 


Dear
Sirs and Madam: 


This
letter constitutes my commitment to make up to $2 million of emergency funds, in the form of debt subordinated to LECG's senior bank debt, available to LECG through October 30,
2002. Such funds, if required, should be requested in writing two business days prior to a draw-down. If advanced, the principal would bear interest at a rate equal to the current Prime Rate plus 3.5%
payable in arrears, plus reimbursement for any legal expenses incurred in connection herewith. 



	 	 	Sincerely yours,
	

 	
 	

/s/  DAVID J. TEECE      
 David J. Teece











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.42
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of INSCI Corp. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), Henry F.
Nelson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2004


/S/ HENRY F. NELSON
----------------------------------------
Henry F. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to INSCI Corp. and will be retained
by INSCI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



                                       26
<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that th i s

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
May 27, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40655 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM J. KRAR,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CR-36-1

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

W illiam J. Krar appeals his guilty-plea senten ce for

possession of a chem ical weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 229

and 229A(a)(1). Krar argues that the enhancement of his sentence

pursuant to United States Sentencing G u idelines § 2M6.1(b)(3)

violates Supreme Court precedent, including Blakely v. Washington
,
124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), because the enhancement was an element of

the offense that should have been char ged in the indictment. In

Blakely
, the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment prohibits2

state sentences greater than “the maximum sentence a judge may
impose solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury

verdict or admitted by the defendant.” B lake ly , 124 S. Ct. at

2537. In United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738, 749-50 (2005),

the Supreme Court held that the system of enhancements established

by the federal sentencing guidelines violates the Sixth Amendment

as construed in Blakely

.

Thi s court’s review is for plain error because Krar’s

Blakely/Booker argument is raised for the first time on appeal.

See United States v. Mares , ___ F.3d ___, No. 03-21035, 2005 WL

503715 at **7-8 (5th Cir Mar. 4, 2005), petition for cert. filed
,

No. 04-9517 (U.S. Mar. 31, 2005). The enhancement of Krar’s

sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2M6.1(b)(3) was plain error because the

facts underlying the enhancement were found by the sentencing judge

under a mandatory guidelines system. S ee Mares , 2005 WL 503715 at

*9. Krar has not demonstrated, however, that the plain error

affected his substantial rights. S ee id. The district court

sentenced Krar to 135 months imprisonment, the top of the

appli cable guideline range, while indicating concern about the

quantity and amount of bomb making material Krar possessed.

Krar also argue s that his due process rights were

violated beca use the indictment did not allege the enhancement

under the sentencing guidelines, and, thus, he had no notice of

that charge again st him. As Krar had actual notice that the

Government would seek the enhance ment, there is no plain error.3

See United States v. Alvarez-Moreno
, 874 F.2d 1402, 1411 (5th Cir.

1989).

AFFIRMED.
Before the First Division,

September 25, 1957

No. 61213.

protests 258265-K and 258428-K (New York).

#### William Shaland *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dime savings banks in chief value of tin or tin plate the same in all material respects as those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), except as to the component material of chief value, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained..
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                         And Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Philip Pilevsky, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of
Philips International Realty Corp. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004
of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:  May 13, 2004                        By:  /s/ Philip Pilevsky
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Philip Pilevsky
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                principal financial officer



-----------
This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Philips International Realty Corp. and will be retained by Philips
International Realty Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31

                                  Certification

I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Ameriquest Mortgage
Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R6;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.
<PAGE>

Date: 3/14/06

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.

/s/ John P. Grazer
------------------
John P. Grazer
CFO
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING CONTRACT

This First Amendment ("Amendment") to the Consulting Contract dated September
30, 2001 (the "Agreement") by and amongst Transmedia Network Inc. (now known as
Idine Rewards Network Inc.), Frank Felix Associates, LTD, and Frank Schmeyer
(each a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties") amends the Agreement as
follows:

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to change certain elements of the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to continue their relationship; and

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt
of which is hereby acknowledge, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:

Except as and if provided otherwise herein, the definitions and defined terms
contained in the Agreement shall have the same meaning herein.

                           Exhibit G to the Agreement:

The original Exhibit G to the Agreement is deleted and replaced by the attached
Exhibit G - Revised Sept. 2002.

All other terms and provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

Idine Rewards Network Inc.                Frank Felix Associates, LTD


        /s/ Stephen E. Lerch                  /s/ Frank Schmeyer, Pres & CEO
-------------------------------------     --------------------------------------
By:  Stephen E. Lerch, Executive          By:  Frank Schmeyer, President and
Vice President and Chief Financial        Chief Executive Officer
Officer                                   Duly Authorized
Duly Authorized

                                          Frank Schmeyer


                                              /s/ Frank Schmeyer
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          By:  Frank Schmeyer

<PAGE>

                         EXHIBIT G - REVISED SEPT. 2002

                        [Fixed Fee and Staffing Schedule]



                        MONTHLY FIXED FEE & STAFFING LEVELS:

    ------------  -----------------  --------------------  ------------  -------
          1.          11/01/2001     12/31/2001              $245,000       13
    ------------  -----------------  --------------------  ------------  -------
          2.          01/01/2002     03/31/2002              $245,000       13

    ------------  -----------------  --------------------  ------------  -------
          3.          04/01/2002     06/30/2002              $245,000       13

    ------------  -----------------  --------------------  ------------  -------
          4.          07/01/2002     9/30/2002               $245,000       13

    ------------  -----------------  --------------------  ------------  -------
          5.          11/01/2002     End of Contract         $245,000       13
    ------------  -----------------  --------------------  ------------  -------
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          | /s/ Gao Ren                          |   |
|---------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:         | Gao Ren                              |   |
| Title:        | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |   |
|          |                                 |   |
| April 5, 2011 |                                 |
|          |                                 |
|          | /s/ Jodie Zheng Wehner               |   |
| Name:         |  Jodie Zheng Wehner             |   |
| Title:        | Chief Financial Officer              |   |
|          |                                 |   |
| April 5, 2011 |                                 |

----
No. 65364.

#### Lummis & Company *v.*United States,

protests 279908-K, 276876-K, and 276875-K (Philadelphia).

*396Opinion, by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 5.02

                   [LETTERHEAD OF GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP]

                                August 27, 1999

(303) 298-5700                                                     C 18591-00018

CSK Auto Corporation
645 East Missouri Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona  85012

         Re:      Registration Statement on Form S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We refer to an aggregate of 60,000 shares of Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of CSK Auto Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), which are the subject of a registration statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Act"), which shares (the "Shares") may be offered and sold under the CSK Auto
Corporation 1996 Executive Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated (the
"Plan").

         We have examined the original, or a photostatic or certified copy, of
such records of the Company, certificates of officers of the Company and of
public officials and such other documents as we have determined relevant and
necessary as the basis for the opinion set forth below. In such examination, we
have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all
documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to original documents of
all documents submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies and the
authenticity of the originals of such copies.

         Based upon our examination mentioned above, we are of the opinion that
the Shares have been validly authorized for issuance and, when (a) the
Registration Statement has become
<PAGE>   2
CSK Auto Corporation
August 27, 1999
Page 2

effective under the Act, (b) the Shares are issued and sold in accordance with
the terms set forth in the Registration Statement and in the Plan, including, in
the case of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of options issued under the
Plan, the payment for the underlying Shares, and (c) the pertinent provisions of
any applicable state securities laws have been complied with, the Shares so
issued will be legally issued and will be fully paid and nonassessable.

         We consent to the filing of this opinion as an Exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm appearing on the cover
of the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we
are within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of
the Act or the General Rules and Regulations of the Commission.

                                               Very truly yours,

                                               /s/  GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 75

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 75

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 5, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘No-
2

•HJ 75 EH

1 vember 10, 1999’’. Public Law 106–46 is amended by

2 striking ‘‘November 5, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘November

3 10, 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 4,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Before the First Division,

December 12, 1962

No. 67262.

protests 59/2860, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Phoenix Hardware Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0478** Docket Number
**2012 -**  **SW -**  **092 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Agusta Bollet tino Tecnico (BT) No. 109 - 134, BT No. 109EP - 121, BT No. 109S 48, BT No. 109K - 54, and BT No. 109SP - 051, all dated September 21, 2012.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 M eacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 16

[KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP LETTERHEAD]

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal accountants for New Mexico and Arizona Land Company
and, under the date of February 20, 1998, we reported on the consolidated
financial statements of New Mexico and Arizona Land Company and subsidiaries as
of and for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997. On November 19, 1998, our
appointment as principal accountants was terminated. We have read New Mexico and
Arizona Land Company's statements included under Item 4 of its Form 8-K dated
November 25, 1998, and we agree with such statements except for we are not in a
position to agree or disagree with the matters discussed in the third paragraph
of Item 4(a) or the matters discussed in Item 4(b).

                                        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

November 25, 1998
! !

! ! !

!

!

! !

! !!!!

!

! !

! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

2009 NSDI CAP Awards

Base data courtesy of the National Atlas of the United States®

Wheaton

Alexandria

March 30, 2009

Project Categories

3: Fifty States Initiative (8)

6: Standards Implementation Assistance and Outreach (2)

5: Building data stewardship for The National Map and the NSDI (4)

2: Behind the Portal - Use of GOS Map and Data Services (4)

1: Metadata Trainer and Outreach Assistance (2)

Fairfax

Los Altos

Old Town

Columbia

Arlington

Silver Spring

Winston-Salem

Norfolk

Moscow

Lansing

Helena

WASHINGTON

OREGON

ARIZONA

ARKANSAS

KENTUCKY

VIRGINIA

!

!

!

!

Burlington

! 4: Enabling Use of Government Tabular Data in a Geographic Context (1)

MICHIGAN

Salt Lake City

Kenai

Indianapolis

DELAWARE

7: Demonstration of Geospatial Data Partnerships across Local,

State and Federal Government (4)

!

!

!