alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Global Imaging Systems, Inc. (the
Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|August 8, 2003Date |  | /s/    THOMAS S. JOHNSONThomas S. Johnson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | 
|August 8, 2003Date |  | /s/    RAYMOND SCHILLINGRaymond Schilling, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (Exchange Act) or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
this Exhibit 99 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.



A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global Imaging Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Global Imaging Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 61705.

#### Ringers’ Dutchocs, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 309622-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-11037

Summary Calendar

 

TIMOTHY WAYNE CARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

POTTER COUNTY SHERIFF, ET AL.,

Defendants,

POTTER COUNTY SHERIFF; 

JIMMY DON BOYDSTON; SGT. LANCASTER,

 Defendants-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:93-CV-339

- - - - - - - - - -

August 30, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Timothy Wayne Carter, #563581, was given a bench trial in

his action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging that prison officials

were deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of attack by
other inmates. See Farmer v. Brennan, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1981-82

(1994).

The district court found that defendants Boydston and

Lancaster were not deliberately indifferent to Carter’s safety

needs because he had been placed in a separate cell to protect

him from other inmates and because neither Boydston nor Lancaster

were responsible for allowing Carter to leave his cell. Rule

52(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides in part: “Findings of fact,

whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set

aside unless clearly erroneous and due regard shall be given to

the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of

the witnesses.” See Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S.

564, 575 (1985). Carter has not shown that the district court

was clearly erroneous in its findings.

AFFIRMED.
Before the First Division,

March 12, 1958

No. 61666.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 300578-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of a camera, as an entirety, and is properly classifiable as a camera, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65374.

#### M. Adler’s Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/5681, etc. (New York).

*398Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

July 14, 1948

No. 52459.

petition 6593-R (Seattle).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the entry was made on the basis of the invoice unit values which represented the price of the shipment to dealers; that a question arose between the broker and the appraiser as to whether or not the merchandise was freely offered; that, in Canada, it was sold to certain dealers who were restricted as to territory and in some sections directly to consumers, but in this country was sold only to dealers with restricted territory; that the appraiser advised the broker that he intended to make an *179advance; and that the entry was made in order to prepare a test case. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Case No. 9,659.

#### MITCHELL v. BARCLAY.

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

1860.

Patents — License—Estoppel— Cebtaintt — Ad- • verse Patent — Exclusive Possession and Enjoyment — Babe Holding of Patent.

1. Thp mere taking a license does not estop the licensee denying the validity of a patent.

2. In order to establish a right by estoppel, the instrument in support of the estoppel must be precise and certain, and must cover a range as wide as the effect sought to be given to it.

3. Upon a motion for a preliminary injunction, the defendant justified his acts under an outstanding adverse patent, which however was alleged to have been irregularly issued.. *Held,*that the court would not ignore the rights of parties under such instrument, because there may have been some irregularity in its issue, and assume it to be a nullity.

4. Where there has been no adjudication as to the validity of a patent under which a party claims, such party must show that he has had exclusive possession and enjoyment for some time before a preliminary injunction will be granted in his favor.

5. The possession and enjoyment of a patent, which will justify a court in granting a preliminary injunction, previous to a trial at law establishing the validity of the patent, must be something more than the mere holding of the parchment, or muniment of title, or experimenting with the patented article. If it is a machine or tool it must be brought into use; if a process, it must be put in execution; if a composition of matter or patented article, it must be put on sale. This is the true doctrine both in England and in this country.

6. The bare holding of a patent and an infringement alone constitute no complete ground of relief, at least by preliminary injunction.

[Cited in Law, Pat. Dig. 281, 387. 395, and 464, to the points as stated above. Nowhere more fully reported; opinion not now accessible.]

[Decided by

SHIPMAN, District Judge.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                       275
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,151
<PP&E>                                          50,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,913
<BONDS>                                         16,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,341
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,903
<SALES>                                          8,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,480
<CGS>                                            5,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
Clean Power Plants/Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing 

Stationary Sources and Standards for Modified and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: EGUs 

Denver, CO 

July 30, 2014 

Press Sign-in Sheet 

Name Affiliation Contact Information 

‘1)-e v 00 , - --2._ (44;,..; co 01 Q(Gas 30 

,ziviir,sqn e f vier ccp,147( t C ern I, 

IA ovtk, T/k4-c, Ick..").k, etivls._ *A.,),occ-c 12,_,QtArx.kk.v. 

tvrt rp 60kit2.7 ( 4 (oo ook EN 11 ava ft-7 e_ kilg. cavil 

Vu P4 v1) pr iPt-➢C)-.Lik -----1'-' tilAn,Aik-e4--(1,- 6 MATr, 7.2c -35d — /206
No. 54525.

#### Alfred H. Marzolf *v.*United States,

protest 151596-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the ■court dismissed the protest.
No. 49910.

#### Protest 25936-K of Ciba Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of the interested parties *181that each of the products in question contains materials provided for in said section 701 as follows: Sapamine KWC Pat. — 53 percent; Silvatol I — 29 percent, the merchandise was held subject to an internal revenue tax of 3 cents per pound under said section to the extent that the weight by quantity of the taxable material bears to the total weight of each of the imported products. Protest sustained to this extent.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 76266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12254]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: Exhibition of a ``Volute 
Krater'' Object

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary exhibition or display in the Department of Greek and Roman 
Art of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of 
cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3142545245585e5f030504087142455045541f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6859395829f9998c4c2c3cfb68582978293d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-24410 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Magnum Hunter Resources
Corporation

To the Board of Directors:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 333-166756, 333-168161, 333-172979, 333-173757, 333-174879 and 333-177486 on Form S-3, the Registration Statement
No. 333-173415 on Form S-4 and the Registration Statement Nos. 333-168802, 333-169814, 333-171168 and 333-177488 on Form S-8 of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation of our reports dated February 29, 2012, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company), and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2011. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in such Prospectus and Prospectus Supplements relating to the
Registration Statements listed above.

|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/S/    HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP                         
|Hein & Associates LLP Dallas, Texas February 29, 2012
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated July 9,
1999, on the financial statements and financial statement schedules included in
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Joint
Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 9, 1999 and to all references to our Firm
included in this Registration Statement.

                               /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                               ---------------------------
                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


New York, New York
October 7, 1999
Intalco's reported Monthly Production and potline SO2 information 2009, 2010, and 2011 Limit means permitted limitation on production or emissions lb/ton limit is lb of pollutant per ton of Al produced, calculated monthly 2009 Operating

or emission Limit UNITS Jan Feb Mar Apr Average Aluminum Production 307000 tpy841 ton/dayton/day 532.6 521.9514.65 506.8 Sulfur Dioxide 37,780 lbs./day21151 20828 19921 20972 44.8 lbs./Ton 38 39.1 39.4 40.0 Potdays 720pots/day 454.0 444.0 440.0 430.0

% of operating pots (operating pots/720 pots) 63 62 61 60 2010 Average Aluminum Production 307000 tpy841 ton/dayton/day 513.2 526.8533.34 534.8 Sulfur Dioxide 37,780 lbs./day23967 22229 21566 25548 44.8 lbs./Ton 43.4 43.1 43.1 43.4 Potdays 720pots/day 443.0 451.0 451.0 465.0

% of operating pots (operating pots/720 pots) 62 63 63 65 2011 Average Aluminum Production 307000 tpy841 ton/dayton/day 536.3 581.3639.89 649.5 37780 lbs./day20203 24263 25263 24499 44.8 lbs./Ton 38.1 39.9 39.8 39.8

720pots/day 461 551.0 556.0 566.0 % of operating pots (operating pots/720 pots) 64 77 77 79 The plant contains 720 pots, divided equally among 3 potlines. Part of a potline (potroom) can be energized without energizing or starting up the whole potline. Sulfur Dioxide Potdayslb/ton limit is lb of pollutant per ton of Al produced, calculated monthly

May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMonthly Avg
495.3 481.4 485.3 485.8 485.2 487.7 497.6 499.3 499.5 20109 20374 20404 20351 20856 20902 21444 2024020629 40.2 41.43 41.7 42.1 42.3 42.7 43.1 42.2 41.0 425.0 416.0 414.0 417.0 418 414.0 425 427 427.0 59 58 58 58 58 58 59 59 59.3

550.4 561.1 544.7 540.6 548.0 546.5 550.9 541.6 541.0 23698 25806 24634 23312 21217 20822 20058 2183622891 43.6 45.5 44.8 44.8 42.4 40.0 37.7 38.3 42.5 467.0 467.0 464.0 467.0 470 468.0 467 464 462.0 65 65 64 65 65 65 65 64 64.2

668.3 661.5 661.9 661.5 671.1 655.2 649.9 636.6 639.4 22578 21994 24468 22220 25159 23764 20569 2266023137 37.2 34.92 34.7 34.6 36 35.8 35.1 34.5 36.7 568.0 569.0 566.0 571.0 566 561.0 549.0 545.0 552.4 79 79 79 79 79 78 76 76 76.7 The plant contains 720 pots, divided equally among 3 potlines. Part of a potline (potroom) can be energized without energizing or starting up the whole potline.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick Fitzsimmons, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alternet Systems Inc.
      for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Alternet Systems Inc..                                                              

Dated: April 14, 2009



| | /s/
      Patrick Fitzsimmons             
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Patrick Fitzsimmons                       
| | Secretary, Treasurer, CFO and Director    
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
| | Accounting Officer)                       
| | Alternet Systems Inc.                     



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alternet Systems
Inc. and will be retained by Alternet Systems Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         428,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,873,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                   245,688
<INVENTORY>                                    516,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,577,540
<PP&E>                                       1,537,661
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,045,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,181,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,876,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    619,883
<COMMON>                                     8,692,637
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,077,417)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,181,123
<SALES>                                     11,419,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,078,678
<CGS>                                        9,909,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,006,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,300,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               245,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             413,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,228,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350




In
connection with the filing of the financial statements of Chindex International,
Inc. (“Registrant”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


July 17, 2009
                  
                  /s/
      Cheryl ChartierDate
                  
                  Cheryl
      ChartierCorporate
      Controller(Principal
      Accounting Officer)




“A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chindex International, Inc. and will be retained by Chindex
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.”