alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jacek Oscilowicz, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Britton International Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:				          (1)  The annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.*/s/ Jacek Oscilowicz*Jacek Oscilowicz					Chief Executive Officer				Chief Financial Officer				September 10, 2007				A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

****

----
房地美失業債務償還期延展選項

失業房主的抵押貸款救濟

身為房主,您是否因為失業而面臨經濟困難?如果您的抵押貸款由房地美擁有,您或許可以透過抵

押貸款服務商(您向其支付抵押貸款付款的機構)提供的房地美失業債務償還期延展選項獲得臨時

救濟。這類選項允許您在最長12個月期限內減少或暫停抵押貸款付款,幫助您在失業期間應對支付

抵押貸款的挑戰。

您是否符合資格條件?* 

如果符合以下條件,您便可以使用這類選項:

 您因為失業而面臨經濟困難;

 物業是您的主要居所;及

 您的抵押貸款由房地美擁有(使用我們的貸款查詢工具來確定您的貸款由誰擁有);

兩種選項

房地美失業債務償還期延展救濟有兩種選項,可幫助您在失業期間應對支付抵押貸款的挑戰:

 短期債務償還期延展選項。如果您符合資格條件,房地美服務商可為您提供六個月的短期

債務償還期延展,您的抵押貸款付款在此期間將暫停或減少。對於這個選項,您必須符合

以下條件:

- 您已按時支付或拖欠抵押貸款付款。

- 如果您在參加住宅可負擔修正計劃(英文簡稱為HAMP)或房地美標準修改嘗試付款

計劃期間失去工作,則您可以轉到這項短期債務償還期延展計劃。

 長期失業債務償還期延展選項。如果您在短期債務償還期延展期結束時仍然失業,房地美

服務商將評估您是否符合長期失業債務償還期延展的資格條件,並且如果您符合資格條件

他們可將您的債務償還期延展期再延長最多六個月。根據這個選項,您的抵押貸款付款可

以暫停或減少。

,

*房地美失業債務償還期延展的資格條件根據多種因素判斷,包括本文所述的因素。 房地美服務商(您向其支付抵押貸

款每月付款額的機構)將判斷您的資格條件。
-2-

其他條件

如有以下情況,您的失業債務償還期延展計劃將被終止:

 您未遵守債務償還期延展計劃按時付款(如果要求付款)。

 您搬出或放棄您的主要居所,或者主要居所被沒收。

 您不再符合任何一項資格條件。

 您停止尋找新工作。

在房地美服務商判斷您是否符合資格期間可能累計逾期罰款。如果您獲准參加失業債務償還期延展

計劃,在延展期內不累計或收取逾期罰款。

如需更多資訊 

 如果想確定您的抵押貸款是否由房地美擁有,請使用我們的貸款查詢工具

https://ww3.freddiemac.com/corporate/。

 聯絡您的服務商。您的每月對賬單或還款存根上應當可以找到他們的電話號碼和郵寄地

址。

 到美國住宅與城市發展部(英文簡稱為HUD)的網站

http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/hcc/fc/index.cfm查找您所在地區HUD認定的非營利諮

詢機構的名單,您可以登門拜訪他們或者給他們打電話。

 聯絡房地美貸款人幫助中心或網路參與者:

http://www.freddiemac.com/avoidforeclosure/who_to_contact_for_help.html#helpcenters ,

HUD認定的非營利諮詢人員將提供保密的財務諮詢服務。

 瀏覽房地美「避免止贖的資源中心」(Avoiding Foreclosure Resource Center):

http://www.freddiemac.com/avoidforeclosure/,查找有用的建議、工具和教育資源,包

括關於與服務商打交道時需要做哪些事情的資訊。

腳註:

 房地美不直接提供此類房地美失業債務償還期延展選項。房地美服務商將與您一起確定您的資格條件。

 當您面臨財務問題或止贖時,有很多組織可以幫助您,但在求助之前一定要選擇一家聲譽良好的組織,

這一點比以往任何時候更加重要。如果有人主動提出幫助,您在接受幫助之前應當進行全面的調查。

前往FreddieMac.com上的房地美「避免欺詐」(Avoiding Fraud)

http://www.freddiemac.com/avoidforeclosure/avoid_fraud.html瞭解如何識別抵押貸款欺詐。

備註:本傳單旨在提供關於房地美失業債務償還期延展選項的一般資訊,並非全面的概要。此類

選項可能有許多其他具體的條款、條件和限制。請聯絡房地美服務商瞭解關於這項計劃及資格條

件的詳細資訊。

出版編號901 ■ 2012年3月
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23

                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

       As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
       by reference in the Dial Corporations' Form 8-K of our report dated May
       28, 1998 and to all references to our Firm included in this filing. It
       should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the
       Company subsequent to December 31, 1997 or performed any audit procedures
       subsequent to the date of our report.


       \s\  Arthur Andersen LLP
       ----------------------------------
            Boston, Massachusetts
            November 24, 1998


                                       23
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350), M. DALE SKEEN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER, OF VITRIA TECHNOLOGY, INC., A DELAWARE
CORPORATION (THE "COMPANY") HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE,
AS FOLLOWS:

      The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "PERIODIC
REPORT"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 6th
day of August 2004.

                                           By:   /s/  M. DALE SKEEN, PH.D.
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 M. DALE SKEEN, PH.D.
                                                 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                                                 CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER

      A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been
provided to Vitria Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Vitria Technology,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Vitria Technology, Inc. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercer Insurance Group, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and amended on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew R. Speaker, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 Date:   January 11, 2006
    /s/ Andrew R. SpeakerAndrew R. SpeakerPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
 23
Before the First Division,

January 3, 1951

No. 55055.

#### Cathay Crafts Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 128671-K and 128673-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of semiprecious stones similar in all material respects to those the subject of *L. Heller & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1268), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey Staszak, Chief Executive Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 30th day of April, 2008.         By:  /s/ Jeffrey Staszak    Jeffrey Staszak    Chief Executive Officer   This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofVolterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1037 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1037

 To ban the importation of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, 
 and to extend the ban on transferring such devices to those that were 
                manufactured before the ban became law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1999

Ms. DeGette (for herself, Mr. Blagojevich, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, 
Mr. Engel, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Underwood, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. 
Towns, Ms. Carson, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Davis of Illinois, 
Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin, Mrs. Jones of 
 Ohio, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. McGovern, 
Mr. Wexler, Mr. Waxman, and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ban the importation of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, 
 and to extend the ban on transferring such devices to those that were 
                manufactured before the ban became law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAN ON IMPORTING LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.

    Section 922(w) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``(1) Except as provided 
        in paragraph (2)'' and inserting ``(1)(A) Except as provided in 
        subparagraph (B)'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``(2) Paragraph (1)'' and 
        inserting ``(B) Subparagraph (A)'';
            (3) by inserting before paragraph (3) the following:
    ``(2) It shall be unlawful for any person to import a large 
capacity ammunition feeding device.''; and
            (4) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1)'' each place it appears and 
                inserting ``(1)(A)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(1)(B)''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF BAN ON TRANSFERRING LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION 
              FEEDING DEVICES TO THOSE THAT WERE MANUFACTURED BEFORE 
              THE BAN BECAME LAW.

    (a) Elimination of Exemption for Transfer of Devices Lawfully 
Possessed Before Enactment of the Ban.--Section 922(w)(1)(B) of title 
18, United States Code, as so redesignated by section 1 of this Act, is 
amended by striking ``or transfer''.
    (b) Expanded Definition.--Section 921(a)(31)(A) of such title is 
amended by striking ``manufactured after the date of enactment of the 
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0440 IN THE MATTER OF: M.D., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 12 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2024

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0440
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF RELIANT RESOURCES, INC.

         Pursuant to Item 601(b)(21)(ii) of Regulation S-K, we have omitted
subsidiaries that when considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the end of our last fiscal
year.

Reliant Energy Corporate Services, LLC
Reliant Energy Retail Holdings, LLC
Reliant Energy Customer Care Services, LLC
Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC
RE Retail Receivables, LLC
Reliant Energy Solutions Holdings, LLC
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
Reliant Energy Wholesale Service Company
Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc.
Reliant Energy Northeast Holdings, Inc.
Reliant Energy Northeast Generation, Inc.
Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC
Reliant Energy New Jersey Holdings, LLC
Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Development, Inc.
Reliant Energy Retail Holdings, LLC
Reliant Energy Solutions East, LLC
Reliant Energy Hunterstown, LLC
Reliant Energy Seward, LLC
Reliant Energy Aurora Holding Corp.
Reliant Energy Aurora, LP
Reliant Energy Choctaw County, LLC
Reliant Energy Florida Holdings, LLC
Reliant Energy Indian River, LLC
Reliant Energy New Smyrna Beach, LLC
Reliant Energy Osceola, LLC
Reliant Energy Winter Haven, LLC
Reliant Energy California Holdings, LLC
Reliant Energy Coolwater, Inc.
Reliant Energy Ormond Beach, Inc.
Reliant Energy Bighorn, LLC
Orion Power Holdings, Inc.
Orion Power Capital, LLC
Orion Power MidWest LP, LLC
Orion Power MidWest, L.P
Twelvepole Creek, LLC
Orion Power New York LP, Inc.
Orion Power New York, L.P.
Astoria Generating Company, L.P.
Erie Boulevard Hydropower, LP
Orion Power Development Company, Inc
Liberty Member, LLC
Liberty MidAtlantic, LLC
Liberty Electric PA, LLC
Liberty Electric Power, LLC
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Multi-Gas Forcing Stabilization with Minicam

Steven J Smith; T M L Wigley

The Energy Journal; 2006; Research Library Core

pg. 373
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Less Effective More Effective

Identifying Violations in Law or Regulations

The old mill at the end

of our street has a rich

history and may contain

artifacts.

As required by the

National Historic

Preservation Act, FERC

must take steps to

identify and protect

historic properties. The old

mill at the end of our

street has a rich history

and may contain artifacts.

At minimum, a historical

survey should assess the

mill’s historic values and

identify mitigation

measures.

Using Examples

The company

underestimates the

economic benefits of

waste minimization.

The company

underestimates the

economic benefits of

waste minimization. As the

attached article shows,

similar companies have

already recouped the

costs from implementing

waste reduction

programs.

Highlighting Specific Concerns

The utility’s proposal is

overly-simplistic and we

disagree with it as the

utility should have

proposed something

more targeted. Also, the

utility was dismissive of

evident facts on the

ground in submitting

this proposal.....

The method that the utility

proposes to model power

flows does not reflect the

fact that the utility’s

system is highly

interconnected with

neighboring systems,

which is not consistent

with Commission

regulations.

1

2

4

3

5

Organize Yourself

Prepare by reviewing the filing and

gathering any background materials.

Identify comment period deadlines and file

on time. Ensure comments reference the

correct docket number.

Get to Your Point

State your objective and your motivation for

commenting up front.

Present a concise and thorough argument,

and include factual information and data, if

available. Offer justifications to support

your comments.

Support Your Points

Provide specific examples of how you would

be impacted negatively or positively. Include

scientific data, charts, graphs, or maps that

support these impacts. When

recommending an alternative course of

action, be specific about the alternative.

Be Specific About Impacts

Understand FERC's Role

Knowing FERC’s role in energy regulation

will help you support your claims. As such,

connect your comments to issues, factors, or

impacts that are within FERC’s authority.

Stay within the "scope" of the proceeding

and focus on issues that FERC regulates.

Top 5 Tips for Powerful Comments

Public comments are essential to creating effective rules and regulations at FERC. Consider

the following tips and techniques for creating thorough and convincing comments.

The Office of Public Participation is committed to

facilitating engagement at FERC and can answer

questions you may have.

Where can I find more information?

OPP@ferc.gov 202-502-6595
No. 63516.

protest 204319-K (New York).

#### Flagstaff Foods *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
A89A2247.

#### WYATT v. THE STATE.

(390 SE2d 85)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was convicted of four counts of selling cocaine in violation of the Controlled Substances Act. He contends on appeal that the evidence did not show that he had actually sold cocaine on any of the four occasions in question but merely that he had served as a procuring agent for the undercover agents who had made the purchases. He further contends that his testimony established as a matter of law that he had been entrapped by the agents. *Held:*

1. “The theory that one may act as a conduit or procuring agent of the purchaser and thus escape culpability as a seller has been considered and rejected by this court. [Cits.]” *Diana v. State,*164 Ga. App. 779, 780 (298 SE2d 281) (1982).

2. The appellant contends that he proved entrapment by testifying that the undercover agents had sought him out and by further testifying that he had made the purchases for them with the intention of keeping a portion of the drugs for his own use in order to feed his cocaine habit.

The appellant’s testimony that the undercover agents approached him rather than vice versa was disputed; and if it were undisputed, it would not establish an entrapment defense under the circumstances. “Entrapment exists where the idea and intention of the *160commission of the crime originated with a government officer or employee, . . . *and he, by undue persuasion, incitement, or deceitful means, induced the accused to commit the act which the accused would not have committed except for the conduct of such officer.”*OCGA § 16-3-25 (Emphasis supplied.) There was no evidence that any “undue persuasion, incitement, or deceitful means” were used to obtain the appellant’s cooperation in this case. Indeed, he effectively admitted that he was ready and willing to cooperate with the agents in order to obtain drugs for his own use. Under the circumstances, his testimony cannot reasonably be said even to have raised the issue of entrapment, much less to have established the defense as a matter of law. See *Mason v. State,*194 Ga. App. 152 (_ SE2d —) (1990); *Raftis v. State,*175 Ga. App. 893, 896 (4) (334 SE2d 857) (1985); *Diana v. State,*supra, 164 Ga. App. at 780 (2); *Mafnas v. State,*149 Ga. App. 286, 290 (254 SE2d 409) (1979).

Decided January 3, 1990.

*Dious, Bailey & Associates, I. Kenneth Dious,*for appellant.

*Joseph H. Briley, District Attorney, James L. Cline, Jr., Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

3. The evidence, considered in its entirety, was amply sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on each of the four counts of which he was convicted. See generally *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         406,655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,850,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,197,818
<PP&E>                                       3,980,262
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,553,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,336,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,635,304
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,611
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,572,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,336,848
<SALES>                                     67,127,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,127,175
<CGS>                                       39,779,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               59,519,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,841,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,999,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,842,311
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,842,311
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>