alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey Staszak, Chief Executive Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as ofthe 30th dayof April, 2007.         By: /s/ Jeffrey Staszak    Jeffrey Staszak         Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofVolterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 59927.

#### S. Susuki & Company, Limited, and Universal Foreign Service Company *v.*United States,

petition 7185-R (Los Angeles).

Ekwall, Judge:

In this action, petitioners seek to obtain remission of sums collected as additional duties on importations of what are described as Ajinomoto from Japan. (Section 489, Tariff Act of 1930.) Said additional duties were assessed, due to the fact that the final appraised value exceeded the value declared on entry.

In support of the petition, the testimony of a customs broker was introduced, who had made entries for the importing company, which company had gone out of existence, due to the war. This witness stated that he had made entries of Ajinomoto frequently for this importer. The goods here involved were entered at the invoice values but were assessed on the basis of United States values, as a result of an investigation made by the Government. When this witness learned that the appraiser intended to use a different basis of value than that at which the goods had been entered, he requested said appraiser to advance the values on the three entries here involved, in order that a test case might be made. Appeals for reappraisement were filed, and the question of the proper value was litigated before this court.

At the conclusion of the testimony of this witness, the Government counsel quoted from a report of a customs agent as follows:

> * * * an investigation was conducted, and the importer cooperated fully by making available to the investigating officer all records and information necessary to determine United States value. The investigating officer’s value report was submitted under date of November 8, 1940, and a supplemental report was submitted on July 19, 1941. In connection with each of the entries involved, the importer requested the Appraiser to advance the value in order that they might file an appeal and establish a test case. All other similar entries were amended at values representing the United States value.

> An interview with the Appraiser indicates full cooperation on the part of the importer and a willingness to obtain any desired information.

> Investigation discloses no information which could indicate any intention to defraud the revenue, conceal or misrepresent the facts, or deceive the Appraiser as to the value of the merchandise.

Upon this state of the record, we hold that the petitioners have shown by satisfactory evidence that the entry of the merchandise at values less than those found on final appraisement was without intent to defraud the Government or deceive its officials and that said petitioners aided the Government officials in an attempt to arrive at the proper dutiable value of the merchandise involved. The petition is, therefore, granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 27, 2008



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                             
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)                                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statement:

(1) Form S-8 pertaining to the Alternet Systems, Inc. 2008
Professional/Consultant Stock Compensation Plan filed on January 29, 2008, of
our Report dated March 20, 2007 on the consolidated balance sheets of the
Company as at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of its operations and
its cash flows and the changes in stockholders deficit for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period from October 13, 2000 (inception) to
December 31, 2006.

DMCL

DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP Chartered
Accountants

Vancouver, Canada January 29, 2008

---
No. 61695.

#### E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 287672-K (New York).

Opinon by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fiber cases which are in chief value of wood, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62975.

#### Adrian Hamers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6472 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, X

The protest was dismissed.
No. 50864.

#### Protests 96314-K, etc., of Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was. stipulated that the merchandise honsists of dog food similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 175, C. A. D. 304). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
H. Res. 56 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 24, 2017. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. Deutch, Ms. Clarke of New 

York, Mr. Polis, and Mr. Brown of Maryland. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - Rule 13a-14(17 CFR 240.13a-14)

I, Thomas A. Dolan,certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, of QRS Music Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Company’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Companyand have:

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual reportis being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annualreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date:  October 13, 2006
|        | /s/ Thomas A. Dolan      |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas A. Dolan          |   |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

----
Turn on more accessible mode                

                    Turn off more accessible mode                

 PapersIt looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again. It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 76889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12255]


Notice of Meeting of Advisory Committee on International Law

AGENCY: Advisory Committee on International Law.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on 
International Law (``ACIL'') will take place on December 1, 2023, from 
9 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. Acting Legal Adviser Richard C. Visek will chair 
the meeting, which will be open to the public up to the capacity of the 
meeting room. The meeting will include discussions on international law 
topics. These topics include: Special Tribunal for the Crime of 
Aggression against Ukraine; the International Law Commission's 
proposals on ``General Principles of Law;'' and new horizons for legal 
diplomacy in investment and trade, human rights, and climate change.

ADDRESSES: George Washington University Law School, Faculty Conference 
Center, 716 20th St. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara M. Rangchi, Office of the Legal 
Adviser, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a283b343d3932332e371a292e3b2e3f743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9abb8b7bebab1b0adb499aaadb8adbcf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-240-1662.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public who wish to attend 
should contact Tara Rangchi by November 24, 2023, and provide their 
name, professional affiliation (if any), email address, and phone 
number. Priority for in-person seating will be given to members of the 
Advisory Committee, and remaining seating will be reserved based upon 
when persons contact the Office of the Legal Adviser. Individuals who 
wish to attend virtually may request a link to the virtual meeting 
platform. Attendees who require reasonable accommodation should make 
their requests by November 24, 2023. Requests received after that date 
will be considered but might not be possible to accommodate.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1009 and 41 CFR 102-3.150.)

Tara M. Rangchi,
Executive Director, Advisory Committee on International Law, Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-24558 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the First Division,

March 26, 1958

No. 61721.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 268085-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, G. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lenses for photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, the merchandise in question is dutiable as photographic lenses, the claim of the plaintiff at 25 percent was sustained.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alternet Systems, Inc.
  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.

|Dated: March 28, 2006 | By: | /s/
      Griffin Jones                     
|--------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Griffin Jones                               
|                      |     | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, CEO
|                      |     | Secretary & Director                        

---
**Exhibit13.1**

 

**AnnualCertification**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Crucell N.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Dated:  December 7, 2007 |                                                                      |                  |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                          |                                                                      |                  |
|                          | By:                                                                       | /s/  Ronald H.P. Brus |   |
|                          |       Name:   Ronald H.P. Brus         |
|                          |       Title:   Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |                                                                           |                       |  |  |

 

 
| Dated:  December 7, 2007 |                                                                      |                |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                          |                                                                      |                |
|                          | By:                                                                       | /s/ Leonard Kruimer |   |
|                          |       Name:   Leonard Kruimer          |
|                          |       Title:   Chief Financial Officer |
|                               |                                                                           |                     |  |  |

 

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126

To require newly-constructed multifamily housing in New York City to comply

with the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1999

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. NADLER, Mr.

OWENS, and Mr. WEINER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science

A BILL

To require newly-constructed multifamily housing in New

York City to comply with the Federal Fire Prevention

and Control Act of 1974.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF EXCEPTION TO FIRE SAFETY RE4 QUIREMENT.

5 (a) REPEAL.—Section 4 of Public Law 103–195 (107

6 Stat. 2298) is hereby repealed.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef8 fect 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 70 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                   House Calendar No. 6
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 70

                           [Report No. 115-6]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known 
                     as the Stream Protection Rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

   Mr. Newhouse, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known 
                     as the Stream Protection Rule.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known 
as the Stream Protection Rule. All points of order against 
consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any amendment 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
                                                   House Calendar No. 6

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 70

                           [Report No. 115-6]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known 
                     as the Stream Protection Rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 30, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
 TAS/BETC not transmitted on 

transactions.

 224 or 1219/1220 submitted 

end of month.

 Reclassify only at end of 

month during open reporting 

window.

 CARS Account Statement (AS) 

becomes viewable after the 

7th business day of month.

 Review Becoming a CARS 

Reporter Overview online 

training course as needed to 

review transition process.

 Attend CARS Reporting 

Overview.

 Determine ALC and system 

type(s) to transition.

 Complete SAM Pilot Set Up.

 Gain access to CARS.

 Communicate with Trading 

Partners indicating CARS 

status and TAS/BETC 

requirement(s).

 Grant permission for CARS 

CRM Team to set IPAC 

requirements (IPAC pilot 

only).

 224 submitted monthly 

(business as usual).

 Reclassify only at end of 

month during open window.

 CARS Account Statement 

(AS) becomes viewable after 

the 7th business day of 

month.

 Attend data analysis 

meeting/call to review 

TAS/BETC information or CKey translation.

 TAS/BETC transmitted on all 

transactions.

 Reclassify (Section 1) available 

all month.

 Account statement available 

all month.

 No Statement of Difference 

(SOD).

 Access to reports in CARS.

 Work with SAM Team if new 

C-Keys or collection 

mechanisms are added.

 Review Becoming a CARS 

Reporter Overview online 

training course as needed to 

review transition process.

 224 or 1219/1220 submitted 

monthly for transactions 

reported without TAS/BETC or 

C-Keys.

 Reclassify only at end of 

month during open window.

 CARS Account Statement (AS) 

becomes viewable after the 

7th business day of month.

 Continue to work with CARS 

team to convert remaining 

system types.

 Online training modules 

available on a variety of 

tasks/processes.

CARS Reporters by Type

Non-CARS Reporter Reporter in Transition Partial Reporter Full Reporter

GWA.CRMD.Users@fms.treas.gov

202-874-9776

Customer Relationship Management

Becoming a CARS Reporter