alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Electronic Tariff Filings Docket No. RM01-5-000

NOTICE REGARDING FOOTNOTES, HEADERS, OR FOOTERS

IN TARIFF TEXT IN THE COMMISSION’S E-TARIFF SYSTEM

(September 6, 2017)

Take notice that the Commission’s electronic tariff system (eTariff) does not 

reproduce footnotes, headers, or footers in the Real-Text-Format (RTF) tariff text posted 

on the Commission’s website (http://etariff.ferc.gov/TariffList.aspx).1

 To the extent 

footnotes, headers or footers are needed in tariff text, filers should enter them separately 

in the body of the document on each page where needed rather than by using automatic 

features of the word processing program.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

 1 This applies to footnotes created programmatically by the word processing

software, such as the Insert Footnote Tool in Microsoft Word, and text added to the 

header or footer areas of a document, such as using the Insert Header or Footer Tool in 

Microsoft Word or clicking in the header or footer areas of the document. 

20170906-3057 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 09/06/2017
Document Content(s)

RM01-5-000.DOCX.......................................................1-1

20170906-3057 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 09/06/2017
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Adam Kablanian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Adam A. Kablanian

Adam A. Kablanian
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 5, 2005
Exhibit 10.54

AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

This
Amendment to Severance Agreement ("Amendment") is made and effective as of November 29, 2005, by and between Reliant Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation having its
principal place of business in Houston, Harris County, Texas (the "Company") and James B. Robb ("Executive").

WHEREAS,
Executive was employed by the Company as the Senior Vice President, Retail Marketing; and

WHEREAS,
Executive will resign from his position as the Company's Senior Vice President, Retail Marketing and all of his other positions with the Company and any of its subsidiaries and
affiliates effective as of November 23, 2005; and

WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive have previously entered into that certain Severance Agreement effective as of January 14, 2003 (the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
the Company considers it in the best interest of the Company to amend certain provisions of the Agreement;

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company and Executive have entered into this Amendment effective as of November 29, 2005, as follows:

1.     The
definition of "Covered Termination" in Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end thereof:



2.     As
used in Section 1 of the Agreement, the phrase "date of Executive's Covered Termination" shall mean the last date Executive shall be on the Company's payroll,
which date is agreed by the parties to be January 3, 2006.

3.     Except
as provided in the preceding two paragraphs of this Amendment, and without duplication of benefits, Executive shall be entitled to the benefits as provided under
the terms of the Agreement, and all terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in the Agreement, including, but not limited to, the Waiver and Release requirement, shall continue in full force and
effect and shall apply with respect to this Amendment.

4.     This
Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same
instrument.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date set forth above.

| |  | RELIANT ENERGY, INC.             
| |  | ---------------------------------
| |  | By:                              
| |  | EXECUTIVE                        
| |  | /s/JAMES B. ROBBJames B. Robb    
| |  | Signature Date: November 29, 2005

---



QuickLinks
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2323** 

In re: DARRYL DEVON GASTON ,
Petitioner.

Petition for W rit of P rohibition
. ( 1:06

- cr - 00310

- JAB

- 1 ; 1:11

- cv - 00771

- JAB

- JLW )

Submitted : January 30, 2014 Decided: February 11, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Petition d enied by un published per curiam opinion
. Darryl Devon Gaston, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darryl Gaston petitions for a writ of prohibition seeking an order directing that his criminal case be dismissed and that he be immediately released. A writ of prohibition “is a drastic and extraordinary remedy which should be granted only when t he petitioner has shown his right to the writ to be clear and undisputable and that the actions of the court were a clear abuse of discretion.” In re Vargas , 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983). A writ of prohibition may not be used as a substitute for appeal. ( Id. ) Gaston has not shown any basis for the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we deny the writ of prohibition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and a rgument would not aid the decisional
process.

PETITION DENIED
No. 51577.

#### Protests 127840-K, etc., of Rudolf Schick (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

An examination of the record in each instance failing to disclose any error in the action of the collector, the protests were overruled.
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1023

For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1999

Mr. METCALF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The limitations set forth in sec5 tions 6511 and 6514(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of

6 1986 (relating to period of limitation on filing claim and

7 on allowance of credits or refunds for tax overpayment)

8 shall not apply to a claim filed by Richard W. Schaffert

9 of Lincoln, Nebraska, for credit or refund of an overpay10 ment of the individual Federal income tax Richard W.

11 Schaffert paid for the taxable year 1983.
2

•HR 1023 IH

1 (b) DEADLINE.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if

2 Richard W. Schaffert submits a claim pursuant to such

3 subsection within the 1-year period beginning on the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,439,425                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,951,435                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (137,000)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,580,356                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,316,913                       0
<PP&E>                                         347,623                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (37,468)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,864,536                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,137,963                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    11,967,061                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     753,652                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,720,713                       0
<SALES>                                     54,084,126              16,251,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,084,126              16,251,491
<CGS>                                       52,592,335              15,740,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,898,243                 796,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,098                   1,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,188               (186,725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,052                (76,719)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,136               (110,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,136               (110,006)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00                   (.01)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
     We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of
Amendment No. 3 to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of SpinCycle, Inc. of
our report dated March 13, 1998 relating to the financial statements of
SpinCycle, Inc., which appears in such Prospectus. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.
    
 
Price Waterhouse LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
   
October 29, 1998
No. 66692.

#### Pan American Food Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/9723 (B), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
NUMBER 13-11-00074-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS,

EX REL. ARMANDO R. VILLALOBOS, 

COUNTY (DISTRICT) ATTORNEY, 

CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relator, the State of Texas, ex rel. Armando R. Villalobos, County (District) 

Attorney, Cameron County, Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above 

cause on February 14, 2011, seeking to compel the trial court to vacate its January 19, 

2011 order rescinding its previously entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and 

granting a de novo hearing on a motion to suppress. On February 16, 2011, the State 

 

1

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is 

not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. The Court, having 

examined and fully considered the motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion 

should be granted. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED as 

moot. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 17th

day of February, 2011.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00522-CR

David Linn Robertson

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1240754D)

January 24, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
2

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00522-CR

DAVID LINN ROBERTSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant David Linn Robertson attempts to appeal from his conviction and 

eight-year sentence for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. The 

trial court’s certification of his right to appeal states that this “is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

On October 31, 2012, this court notified appellant about the statement on 

the trial court’s certification and informed him that unless he or any party desiring 

to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before November 12, 2012, a 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
3

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal could be 

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3. Although we have received 

a response, it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Therefore, we 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 

S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 24, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 2, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 20, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 82 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-22, CP2024-22.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-24144 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Patricia Gallup, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 08, 2009 |  | /s/    Patricia Gallup               
|                   |  | Patricia Gallup                      
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Daniel McCranie, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ J. Daniel McCranie               
|J. Daniel McCranie                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|February 11, 2008
Before the Second Division,

September 20, 1957

No. 61210.

protests 263440-K, 264357-K, and 277014-K (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Xiali
Gan, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008 of Dragon International Group Corp.(the “Issuer”);





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
other signing officers and I are:





a)           responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures;





b)           have
designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to
the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to such
officers by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;





c)           have
evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer's internal controls as of the date
within 90 days prior to the report; and





d)           have
presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the Issuer’s
internal controls based on our evaluation as of that date;





5. The
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, to the Issuer's auditors and the
audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):





a)           all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the Issuer’s auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Issuer's internal controls; and





6. The
other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.





November 13,
2008




By:
/s/ Xiali Gan


Xiali
Gan, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 108 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 108

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                  relating to voluntary school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2000

    Mr. Graham introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                  relating to voluntary school prayer.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following article is 
hereby proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United 
States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the 
Constitution if ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the 
several States within seven years from the date of its submission to 
the States by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to prohibit 
voluntary individual or group prayer in public schools or other public 
institutions. No person shall be required by the United States or by 
any State to participate in prayer. Neither the United States nor any 
State shall compose the words of any prayer to be said in public 
schools.''.
                                 <all>
```