alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
psn-ex1015_1473.htm



Exhibit 10.15

Third Amendment to the
PARSONS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
2019 Amendment and Restatement

The Parsons Employee Stock Ownership Plan 2019 Amendment and Restatement (as amended, the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, in each case with respect to all diversifications elected or processed on or after January 1, 2021:


	
1.
	
Sections 7.5(a) and 7.5(b) of the Plan are hereby amended and restated to read as follows:




 

(a)For the purpose of this Section 7.5 only, the following definitions shall apply: 

(1)“Qualified Participant” shall mean a Participant who has attained age 50 and who has completed at least 3 years of participation in the Plan.

 

(2)“Qualified Election Period” shall mean the eleven Plan Year period beginning with the Plan Year in which the Participant first becomes a Qualified Participant.

 

(3)“Annual Election Period” shall mean the 150-day period beginning on the January 1st following the end of each Plan Year in the Participant’s Qualified Election Period. 

 

(b)Each Qualified Participant shall be permitted to direct the Plan as to the diversification of 50% of the value of the vested portion of the Participant’s ESOP Account (or any subaccounts under such Account) subject to the diversification rules in respect of Company Stock which was acquired by the Plan after December 31, 1986, in the manner provided under subsection (c) below, during each Annual Election Period.

 

[Signature page follows.]





 


	

	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument of amendment is executed this ______ day of December, 2020.




PARSONS CORPORATION

By: 

Name: 

Title: __________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signature Page to the Third Amendment

to the Parsons Employee Stock Ownership Plan

2019 Amendment and Restatement
1

Hunt, Jeff

From: Clouse, Sarah (ECY) [sclo461@ECY.WA.GOV]

Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 1:50 PM

To: Hunt, Jeff

Cc: Johnston, Jeff (ECY)

Subject: Emails cited in the EI documentation

Attachments: Fuel Use by County for 2008 - Amtrak; UPRR Washington Est Fuel Consumption 2008; 

Request for 2008 State of Washington Data

Hi Jeff,

I apologize, but I sent Jeff J. the wrong attachments for the locomotive emissions cited in the EI for 2008 (I sent the 2011

data).  Here are the correct emails.

Have a good weekend!

Sarah Clouse 

Dept. of Ecology 

Air Quality Program 

(360) 407-6832 

sarah.clouse@ecy.wa.gov

3 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
Order entered January 20, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01110-CR

DONALD WAYNE OWENS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 070234

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated for the appointment of counsel. On January 14, 2021, a reporter’s 

record from that hearing was filed and the following day, the trial court’s findings 

of fact were filed. We ADOPT the trial court’s findings that appellant is indigent 

and entitled to court-appointed counsel in this appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk to 

list Garland Cardwell as appointed counsel for appellant. All future 

correspondence shall be sent to Mr. Cardwell at the address on file with the Court.
The clerk’s and reporter’s records are due February 15, 2021.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Brian 

Gary, Presiding Judge, 397th Judicial District Court; to Kelly Ashmore, Grayson 

County District Clerk; to Paula Thomas, official court reporter, 397th Judicial 

District Court; to Donald Wayne Owens, TDCJ #02333367, Hutchins Unit, 1500 

E. Langdon Rd., Dallas, TX 75241; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michal Mazurek, Chief Financial Officer of Stream Communications Network & Media Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. the Amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Amended Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. the information contained in the Amended Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:        /s/ Michal Mazurek
Name:   Michal Mazurek
Title:     Chief Financial Officer







Date:    May 14, 2009



This certification accompanies this Amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-099
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2146

___________ Charles Pointer, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri Building Stars Advantage, * * [Unpublished] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 30, 2004 Filed: December 14, 2004

___________ Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles Pointer appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri, granting summary judgment to defendant Buildingstars/St. Louis, Inc. (Buildingstars) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 action. Pointer claimed Buildingstars denied him a business franchise because of his sex and race. For reversal Pointer argues the district court erred in granting summary judgment because he was not allowed time for discovery, Buildingstars failed to prove he-2- would be an unsuccessful franchisee, and Buildingstars violated franchise and other law. After careful review, see Kincaid v. City of Omaha , 378 F.3d 799, 803-04 (8th Cir. 2004), we conclude for the following reasons that summary judgment was proper. First, Pointer did not request additional discovery time or submit a Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) affidavit. Second, § 1981 does not apply to sex discrimination. See Runyon v. McCreary , 427 U.S. 160, 167 (1976). Third, even if Pointer had the minimum qualifications for a franchisee, he did not show that the franchise denial was motivated by racial discrimination. SeeRuiz v. A.B. Chance Co. , 234 F.3d 654, 671 (Fed. Cir. 2000). Finally, Pointer did not show a violation of law. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2018

No. 04-18-00331-CV

CITY OF PEARSALL,

Appellant

v.

Sergio CORREA,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-12-00464CVF

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was filed on August 23, 2018. Therefore, appellee’s brief was due to be 

filed on September 12, 2018. As of this date, neither the appellee’s brief nor a motion for 

extension of time has been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellee show cause in writing 

within ten (10) days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be set at issue. If 

appellee fails to respond, this appeal will be set at issue without an appellee’s brief.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Before the Third Division,

July 16, 1948

No. 52467.

protests 865869-G, etc. (New York).

#### Toa Kigyo Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial the attorney for the plaintiff stated that the corporate plaintiff, Toa Kigyo Corp., was a New York corporation; that the officers and directors were Japanese citizens; that he did not have any power to dispose of the eases, but that he had examined the protests with counsel for the Government and he fpund no merit in any of them. Counsel for the Government stated that the Alien Property Custodian had made no vesting order because the plaintiff itself was a New York corporation. An examination of the official records disclosing nothing to warrant disturbing the decision of the collector, the protests were overruled.
No. 59405.

protests 211361-K and 191626-K (New York).

#### Novelty Veiling Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-086
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

P ETER KOSTYSHYN

,

Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF WILMINGTON

, a Mun icipal C orporation of the State of Delaware,

Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § No. 309 , 202 2 § § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. N18J

- 02078 § § § § §

Submitted: November 4 , 202 2
Decided: November 15 , 202 2

ORDER

The appellant filed a notice of appeal in this matter o n August 30 , 202 2 , and

an amended notice of appeal on September 23, 2022 . On September 23

, 202 2 , the

Senior Court Clerk sent the appellant a letter directing him to pay the filing fee or to

file a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis by October 11, 2022, or a

notice to show cause would issue

. The Senior Court Clerk sent another letter to the

appellant on October 11, 2022, notifying him of the requirement that he pay the filing

fee or file a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis . The appellant

submit ted various filings and correspondence to the Court between September 23

and October 12 , but did not pay the filing fee or file a motion and affidavit to proceed

in forma pauperis

. On October 18 , 202 2 , t he Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice

,2

sent by certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should

not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or to file a motion to proceed in

forma pauperis

. Correspondence from the Senior Court Clerk to the appellant on

October 21, 2022, also notified the appellant that the notice to show cause had been

issued on October 18, 2022, and that no action would be taken on any further filings

by the appellant until the notice to show cause was resolved. On October 27 , 202 2

,

the Court received the certified

- mail receipt indicating that the notice to show caused

was delivered on October 24, 2022 . The appellant having failed to respond to the

notice to show cause within the required ten

- day period, dismissal of this action is

deemed to be unopposed.

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS OR DERED, under Supreme Court Rule s 3(b) (2)

and 29(b) , that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.
Justice
Before the Second Division,

July 21, 1948

No. 52474.

protests 653447-G and 89347-K (New York).

#### Julius Kayser & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cotton fabric the same in all material respects as the fabric of which the gloves the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. *184333) were made. The claim at 35 percent ad valorem, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),Michael Grey, the Chief Executive Officer of SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and ToddMyers, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “AnnualReport”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end ofthe period covered by the Annual Report and results of operations of theCompany for the period covered by the Annual Report.Dated: March 31, 2006   /s/ Michael Grey /s/ Todd Myers   Michael Grey
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 2, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 25, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
85 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-26, CP2024-26.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24147 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Before the First Division,

November 6, 1961

No. 66190.

#### R. J. Saunders *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/7031 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of photoflash lamps the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 64250, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52858.

#### William J. Oberle, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 134596-K/12929 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was agreed that 15 bags of alfalfa seed were never imported into this country. In accordance with the agreed statement of facts it was held that all duty taken upon the 15 bags of alfalfa seed, not landed, should be refunded. *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) followed.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Convera Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended January
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Matthew G. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By: /s/ Matthew G.
Jones


Matthew
G. Jones


Chief
Financial Officer


March 31,
2009
Order entered September 17, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01655
- CV
LULLY'S INC. D/B/A/ THE RIGHT ONE, Appellant V. MELANIE MATTOON, ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 03363



### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s September 13, 2013 agreed motion to extend abatement of appeal. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that this appeal remain abated for 180 days from the date o f this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1097

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the $500 per

child tax credit and other individual nonrefundable credits by repealing

the complex limitations on the allowance of those credits resulting from

their interaction with the alternative minimum tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify

the $500 per child tax credit and other individual nonrefundable credits by repealing the complex limitations

on the allowance of those credits resulting from their

interaction with the alternative minimum tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SIMPLIFICATION OF $500 PER CHILD FAMILY

4 CREDIT.

5 (a) ALLOWANCE OF PERSONAL NONREFUNDABLE

6 CREDITS AGAINST MINIMUM TAX.—Subsection (a) of sec7 tion 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
2

•HR 1097 IH

1 to limitation based on amount of tax) is amended to read

2 as follows:

3 ‘‘(a) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX.—The

4 aggregate amount of credits allowed by this subpart for

5 the taxable year shall not exceed the sum of—

6 ‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s regular tax liability for the

7 taxable year, and

8 ‘‘(2) the tax imposed for the taxable year by

9 section 55(a).’’.

10 (b) SIMPLIFICATION OF PARTIALLY REFUNDABLE

11 CREDIT.—

12 (1) Subsection (d) of section 24 of such Code

13 is amended by striking paragraph (2) and redesig14 nating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).

15 (2) Section 32 of such Code is amended by

16 striking subsection (n).

17 (c) REDUCTION IN INCOME THRESHOLD AMOUNT

18 FOR PHASEOUT OF CHILD TAX CREDIT.—Paragraph (2)

19 of section 24(b) of such Code (relating to threshold

20 amount) is amended—

21 (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking

22 ‘‘$110,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$91,000’’,

23 (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘$75,000’’

24 and inserting ‘‘$60,000’’, and
3

•HR 1097 IH

1 (3) in subparagraph (C) by striking ‘‘$55,000’’

2 and inserting ‘‘$45,500’’.

3 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 December 31, 1998.

Æ