alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 57

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

honoring the 100th anniversary of the Junior League.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mr. BARR of Georgia submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued honoring the 100th anniversary of the

Junior League.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a postage stamp honoring the 100th anniver5 sary of the Junior League; and

6 (2) the Citizen’s Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
(Reap. Dec. 10277)

Entry No. 110940.

#### Gehrig, Hoban and Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 25, 1962)

*Says, Busby and Rimkin*for the plaintiff.

*J oseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for reap-praisement has been submitted for decision on stipulation of counsel for the parties, on the basis of which I find that cost of production, as defined in section 402a(f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs *338Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the perfumes involved and that such values are the appraised unit values, less 2.041 per centum, plus the cost of packing at $5 per case.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Cathy L.
Wood, as Chief Financial Officer of SM&A (the Company) hereby certify that,
based on my knowledge: 1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: October 22, 2004
    
    /s/ CATHY L. WOODCathy L. WoodExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
 28
Page 1 of 2

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

DIVISION OF BANKING

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

SR 11-8

June 3, 2011

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION

 AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

SUBJECT: Supervisory Guidance on Implementation Issues Related to the Advanced 

Measurement Approaches for Operational Risk

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the other federal banking 

agencies1 are issuing the attached Interagency Guidance on the Advanced Measurement 

Approaches for Operational Risk to address and provide clarity on implementation issues related 

to the advanced measurement approaches (AMA) in the agencies’ advanced capital adequacy 

framework (advanced approaches rule).

2

The guidance focuses on the combination and use of the four required AMA data 

elements:

 Since the guidance only applies to banking 

organizations that are required to adopt the advanced approaches or have opted to do so, it 

generally will not be applicable to community banking organizations. The guidance discusses 

certain common implementation issues and challenges, as well as key considerations for 

addressing these challenges in order to implement a satisfactory AMA framework. 

1) Internal operational loss event data

2) External operational loss event data

3) Scenario analysis

4) Business environment and internal control factors

Given some of the unique challenges related to the use of scenario analysis in the AMA, 

this data element is discussed in greater detail. Governance and validation are also discussed in 

light of their importance in ensuring the integrity of a bank’s AMA framework. While this 

guidance addresses certain aspects of the minimum risk-based capital requirements for 

operational risk, it is not intended to address the treatment of operational risk in a bank’s internal 

capital adequacy assessment process. 

 1 The other federal banking agencies include the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency, and the Office of Thrift Supervision. 

2 See 12 CFR 208, Appendix F, and 12 CFR 225, Appendix G. 
Page 2 of 2

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter to financial institutions supervised by the

Federal Reserve in their districts that are required to implement or that have shown an interest in 

implementing the advanced approaches rule. Questions on the attached guidance should be 

addressed to Adrienne Haden, Assistant Director, Operational and Information Technology Risk, 

at (202) 452-2058, or Kenneth Fulton, Supervisory Financial Analyst, Risk Section, at 

(202) 452-2314. In addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s public website.3

Patrick M. Parkinson

Director

Attachment:

Interagency Guidance on the Advanced Measurement Approaches for Operational Risk

 3 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/feedback.cfm.
No. 63531.

protests 246609-K, etc. (New York).

#### John J. Barry et al. *v.*United States,

*411Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 58853.

protests 215499-K and 215500-K (New York).

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

*312Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

October 18, 1960

No. 64738.

#### F. C. G. Importers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 963132-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D 1155), the claim of-the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                         ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (THOUSANDS EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  NINE MONTHS
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              --------------------
                                                                1998        1999
                                                              --------    --------
                                                                  (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense..........................................  $ 61,045    $ 219,145
  Interest capitalized......................................    47,004       14,994
                                                              --------    ---------
     Total interest expense.................................   108,049      234,139
  Interest component of rent expense........................     2,822        7,426
  Amortization of debt issuance costs.......................     2,876       13,558
                                                              --------    ---------
     Total fixed charges....................................  $113,747    $ 255,123
                                                              ========    =========
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes................................  $110,979    $(298,696)
  Plus fixed charges........................................   113,747      255,123
  Less interest capitalized.................................   (47,004)     (14,994)
                                                              --------    ---------
     Total earnings.........................................  $177,722    $ (58,567)
                                                              ========    =========
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges........................      1.56x       *
                                                              ========    =========
* Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $313,690.
</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

February 1, 1949

No. 52861.

#### J. A. Sanders et al. *v.*United States,

protests 130935-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                February 3, 1999

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

SpeedFam International, Inc.
305 North 54th Street
Chandler, Arizona  85226


         Re:               SpeedFam International, Inc.
                         Form S-4 Registration Statement

Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel for SpeedFam International, Inc. (the
"Company"), in connection with the proposed issuance of certain shares of the
Company's common stock, without par value (the "Shares"), in connection with the
merger of Integrated Process Equipment Corp., a Delaware corporation, with a
subsidiary of the Company. As such counsel, we have examined such corporate
records and other documents and matters of law as we have deemed necessary in
order to enable us to express the opinion hereinafter set forth, including,
without limitation, the Company's registration statement on Form S-4 (the
"Registration Statement") which is being filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 on the date hereof.

         Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, upon issuance of
the Shares for the consideration stated in the Prospectus constituting a part of
the above-mentioned Registration Statement and as otherwise contemplated by such
Registration Statement and the Merger Agreement referred to therein, the Shares
will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
above-mentioned Registration Statement and to the use of our name and the
reference to our firm in said Registration Statement and in the Prospectus
included as a part thereof.

                                    Respectfully submitted,


                                    CHAPMAN AND CUTLER
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. on Form 20-F
for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the United States Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Yasuhiro Sato, Chief Executive Officer, and Takeo Nakano, Chief Financial Officer of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., each certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 20, 2011



By:

/s/ Yasuhiro SatoName: Yasuhiro SatoTitle: Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/ Takeo NakanoName: Takeo NakanoTitle: Chief Financial Officer
No. 55109.

#### Amdelta Leather Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 155454-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# Stack of Gen Units

NERC Generating Unit Statistic Reports

NERC Generating Unit Statistic Reports

# State Income Tax Rates
**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


**Washington,
      D.C. 20549**





**FORM
      8-K**





**CURRENT
      REPORT**


**Pursuant
      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934**





**Date
      of Report (Date of earliest event reported):**June 13,
      2007





CHINDEX
        INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
 (Exact
        Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
  DELAWARE
              
              0-24624
              
              13-3097642(State
                  of Incorporation)
              
              (Commission
                  File Number)
              
              (IRS
                  Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 7201
                  WISCONSIN AVENUEBETHESDA,
                  MARYLAND
              
              
              20814(Address
                  of Principal Executive Offices)
              
              
              (Zip
                  Code)


Registrant's
      telephone number, including area code:  (301) 215−7777




Check
      the
      appropriate box below if the Form 8−K filing is intended to simultaneously
      satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
      provisions:





[
      ]
      Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)





[
      ]
      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a−12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a−12)





[
      ]
      Pre−commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d−2(b) under the Exchange Act
      (17 CFR 240.14d−2(b))





[
      ]
      Pre−commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e−4(c) under the Exchange Act
      (17 CFR 240.13e−4(c))





**Item
      5.02(b).**  **Departure
      of
      Director.**





On
      June 13, 2007, Douglas B. Grob
      resigned his directorship with Chindex International, Inc. (the “Company”) in
      order to accept the position of Staff Director of the Congressional-Executive
      Commission on China, which was created by Congress in 2000 with the legislative
      mandate to monitor human rights and the development of the rule of law in China,
      and to submit an annual report to the President and Congress. It consists of
      nine Senators, nine members of the House of Representatives, and five senior
      Administration officials appointed by the President.  The Board of
      Directors of the Company has accepted Mr. Grob’s resignation with congratulations and gratitude
      for his
      services to theCompany and its shareholders.









SIGNATURES





Pursuant
      to the requirements of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report
      to
      be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
      authorized.




Date:  June
                19, 2007CHINDEX
              INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:
            /s/
              Lawrence
              PembleName:
              Lawrence
              PembleTitle:   Chief
              Financial Officer
Quick Guide 

eFiling Guidelines for 

Submitting Accounting Filings and Requests 

Step 1. Prepare your submission in the same manner as if submitting a paper filing. 

Step 2. Log In to FERC Online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp. 

2.01 Enter your individual registered email and password. Click Submit button. 

 Note: You must be eRegistered to access the eFiling System or any other 

 FERC Online application. To register, click the Sign-up link and follow the 

 Registration process. 

 

Step 3. On the FERC Online Home page, click eFiling link. 

Step 4. On the FERC eFile page, click Create Filing link. 

Step 5. On the Filing Type Selection page, click Accounting Filing or Request link 

(in respective area). 

 Note: “Accounting Filings or Requests” category is in reference to “AC” 

docketed workload items which include: issues related to the Commission’s 

Uniform Systems of Accounts, financial forms – including requests for 

extensions of time to file those forms, and preservation of records 

requirements. 

Step 6. On the File Upload page, click Browse button. 

6.01 Locate and highlight the desired file. The file description block is optional 

and need not be used unless you have multiple files and want to enter a 

description for each file. Click Attach button. Repeat to add up to a 

maximum of 10 files. 

6.02 Click on Upload Files button. 

6.03 You will see an on screen message that FERC has received your file(s). 

Click Ok button. 

Version 1.0 (July 28, 2006) 
Step 7. On the Specify Filing Party/Parties page, choose “On behalf of another 

party(ies)” or “For an Individual.” If the filing is for another party, 

query and select the organization name. Click Next button. 

 

Step 8. On the Specify the Primary Person/Counsel of Record to be Served page, 

type in an email address for the person responsible for the filing. Click 

Add button. Repeat to list multiple contacts. 

8.01 Click Next button once all contacts have been added. 

Step 9. On the Submission Description page, modify the default submission 

description to more fully describe your submission. The description will 

include the term “New Docket” at the end. If your submission pertains to an 

existing AC Docket, please replace “New Docket” with the applicable AC 

Docket. Click Next button. 

Step 10. On the Summary page, you will see a summarization of your submission. If 

you attached the wrong file, you must cancel and start over. Otherwise, 

click Submit button to complete the filing process. 

 Note: You will receive a confirmation of receipt email within a couple of 

minutes. This email will contain a link that provides information about your 

filing. 

 Note: Once the filing is reviewed and accepted for filing, you will receive a 

second email with a hyperlink to the document in eLibrary. If you file late 

in the day, it may be the following day before you receive the Acceptance 

for Filing email. The time of Acceptance for Filing does not affect the date 

and time of your submission, nor does Acceptance for Filing constitute 

approval of your request. 

Version 1.0 (July 28, 2006)
OMB Support Statement Study of Enhanced College Advising in Upward Bound

Abt Associates Inc. Appendix D. Student Survey Email Reminder ▌ pg D-1

Appendix D. Student Survey Email Reminder
OMB Support Statement Study of Enhanced College Advising in Upward Bound

Abt Associates Inc. Appendix D. Student Survey Email Reminder ▌ pg D-2

Appendix E: Email Reminder for Student Survey

Dear [RESPONDENT NAME],

As you may be aware, your Upward Bound program is participating in the Demonstration of Find the 

Fit: Studying Enhanced College Advising in Upward Bound. The goal of the study is to better 

understand what college advising strategies work in Upward Bound programs and to increase the 

number of students who enroll in colleges that match their abilities and interests.

You have been selected to participate in the surveys that will be part of this study!

The U.S. Department of Education would like to know your opinions, experiences, and awareness 

about your preparation for college. Your answers will help improve the college advising support 

services provided in the Upward Bound program. Your parent/guardian has said it is ok for you to 

complete the survey but you do not have to participate. Your decision about the study will not affect 

your participation in the Upward Bound program. 

Please follow the link below to begin and complete the survey.

http://www.XXXXX.com

Login ID: XXXX

Password: XXXXXXXX

Your participation in the survey is voluntary and you may choose not to answer a question or to stop 

at any point. You can take part in Upward Bound even if you do not take the survey. 

The survey should take about 15 minutes to complete. 

We know your time is valuable and thank you in advance for completing this survey! 

Sincerely,

Alina Martinez, Ed.D.

Study Project Director

Study Contacts

Study Website: www.UBDemo.com

Study Email: UBDemo@abtassoc.com

Study Toll-Free Number: 1-855-489-0480

Protecting your privacy is very important to us. The study reports will not include your name or the name of your UB project. We will not 

share information that identifies your to anyone outside the study team, except as required by law.

If you have any questions about participating in the study, please call 1-855-489-0480, or email UBDemo@abtassociates.com. If you have 

any questions about subjects’ rights, please contact Abt’s Institutional Review Board Administrator, Katie Speanburg, by phone at 1-(877) 

520-6835 [toll-free number]. If you have questions about the UB program, please contact your school directly.
Airworthiness Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20591 DearSir or Madam, Dec-7-2015

As Pilot In Command (PIC), I am responsible for the airworthiness ofthe platform being tested and personallyverify its condition and maintenance aswell asthe flight test plans and procedures. In accordance with MIL-HDBK-516the DJI Phantom 3 Professional has been reviewed and determined to be airworthyforoperation in Georgia Southern University's aerial data acquisitions. The University has developed internal procedures using various methods to effectively demonstrate and assertthat the sUAS being considered is airworthy. The sUAS meets the applicable airworthiness standards and requirements of our University, and is capable ofoperating in compliance with the applicable requirements in 14 CFR Part 91. Sincerely,

# ~~ Joseph Reeves
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 96-20361

_______________

MARATHON OIL COMPANY,

MARATHON INTERNATIONAL OIL COMPANY,

and

MARATHON PETROLEUM NORGE A/S,

Plaintiffs-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees,

VERSUS

A.G. RUHRGAS,

Defendant-Appellee/

Cross-Appellant.

_________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

_________________________

June 25, 1999

ON REMAND FROM

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before KING, Chief Judge, POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS,

JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS,

BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This court, sitting en banc, reversed and remanded the

judgment of the district court. See Marathon Oil Co. v. A.G.

Ruhrgas, 145 F.3d 211 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc). The Supreme Court

reversed and remanded the judgment of this court. See Ruhrgas AG
2

v. Marathon Oil Co., 119 S. Ct. 1563 (1999). 

This matter is REMANDED to the panel that originally decided

it. See Marathon Oil Co. v. Ruhrgas, A.G., 115 F.3d 315, 318 (5th

Cir. 1997). The motion to recall mandate is DENIED as unnecessary.

The motion to expedite appeal is CARRIED WITH THE CASE, for

consideration by the panel.