alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Metro One Development, Inc, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATE: August 4, 2010


/s/ Stuart Turk
----------------------------------------
Stuart Turk, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Executive Officer, President,
Chairman of the Board and Director



/s/ Evan Schwartzberg
----------------------------------------
Evan Schwartzberg   , Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
July 1, 2015

Mr. W ad e Stuart

613 East 134 th Street

Burnsville, MN 55337

Dear Mr. Stuart :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 26, 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

-

2516 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you mus t send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sec tions of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your reques t.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before th e proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 99.2

March 16, 2005

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4.01 of Amendment No. 1 to Form 8-K dated the date hereof, of
Chindex International Inc. and are in agreement with statements contained in the
second, third and fourth paragraphs therein and the statements attributable to
Ernst & Young LLP in Exhibit 99.1 thereto. We have no basis to agree or disagree
with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

Regarding the registrant's statement concerning the material weakness in
internal control relating to the preparation of financial statements included in
Exhibit 99.1, we considered such matter in determining the nature, timing and
extent of procedures performed in our audit of the registrant's March 31, 2004
financial statements.

                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### [Protective Life and Annuity Company Letterhead]

## Exhibit 32(a)

#### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne E.
Stuenkel, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Wayne E. Stuenkel
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 14, 2003

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Before the Second Division,

May 8, 1957

No. 60720.

#### Intra-Mar Transport Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 272682-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark Jarvis, of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: November 20, 2015



Mark
JarvisMark Jarvis Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

---
No. 55786.

protest 169783-K (A) (New York).

#### J. D. Smith Inter-Ocean, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Galaxy UAV Systems

May 8, 2015 6215 Kirby lane, Frisco, TX 75035

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590



### Subject : Amendment to Section 333 Petition, Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0161

Dear Sir or Madam,

Regarding our Section 333 exemption request (Docket No.FAA

- 2015_0161), Galaxy UAV

Systems (Galaxy) hereby request to amend our existing petition.

Galaxy would like to include DJI Inspire 1 unmanned airc raft to our proposed operations.

DJI Inspire 1 is a quadcopter with enhanced safety features and more stable flight

characteristics , compared to the DJI Phantom 2 series, which previously received Section 333

grants issued to various commercial ent ities.

Galaxy believes that including the DJI Inspire 1 to our proposed operations does not change

the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and s afety

, which we stated in our

original petitio n.

We are submitting Inspire 1 manuals and supporting document s along with this request.

Such documents include aircraft description, performance , and maintenance information.

We will also utilize applicable sections from our supporting documents previously

submitted separately by emai l.

If you have any questions, please contact at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely yours,



### Bryan Archer

President

Galaxy UAV Systems

6215 Kirby Lane

, Frisco, Texas 75035

Tel : 469

- 766

- 0420

Email: bryan.archer@galaxyuav.com
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.61


February 5, 2003


Stephen C. Farrell
8 Minute Man Lane
Lexington, MA   02421

                      Re: Amendment of Employment Agreement

Dear Steve,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the Employment Agreement dated as
of September 1, 2000, by and between you and PolyMedica Corporation (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of April 16, 2001;
September 24, 2001; October 12, 2001; May 31, 2002 and July 15, 2002 (together,
the "Employment Agreement").

      Salary. The Base Salary, as defined in Section 3.1. of the Employment
      Agreement, shall be increased to $260,000 effective December 18, 2002.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.


                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ John K.P. Stone III
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       John K. P. Stone III
                                       Vice Chairman and General Counsel


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


/s/ Stephen C. Farrell
-----------------------------------
Stephen C. Farrell
Chief Financial Officer


                                      -52-
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000406 31-DEC-2019 08:00 AM
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.57

                           Memorandum of Understanding


         This  Memorandum of  Understanding  is between  HiEnergy  Technologies,
Inc., 1601 Alton Parkway,  Irvine CA 92612 (HiEnergy") and Aeropuertos Espanoles
y Navegacion Aerea, Edificio La Piovera - Peonias, 2 28042 Madrid ("Aena").


         1.       HiEnergy  intends to test its system in Spain and Aena intends
                  to establish a collaboration with HiEnergy for the development
                  of the technology for the security of Spain.

         2.       Aena Agrees to:

                  a.       Allow the use of its premises

                  b.       Appoint one contact person

                  c.       Provide technical performance specifications required
                           for the test

                  d.       Obtain  the  assistance  of  Spanish  State  Security
                           forces.

                  e.       Evaluate the system performance

                  f.       Upon successful CarBomb Finder test, to make its best
                           effort to arrange an opportunity for HiEnergy to test
                           its detector as a False Alarm Eliminator for luggage.

3.                HiEnergy agrees:

                  a.       To make its system available for the test

                  b.       To provide appropriate scientific/technical personnel
                           to operate the test

                  c.       To bear all expenses associated with the test

4.       Duration The approximate  starting date of the test will be December 1,
         2003
         Phase I: Two Weeks
         Phase II: Two Weeks

5.       Indemnification

         HiEnergy  will be  responsible  for  claims  for  damages  arising as a
         consequence  of the tests,  that are  brought by any third  party,  and
         indemnify Aena as to any claims,  accusations,  and demands for damages
         which  Aena  receives  derived  from  its  activities  at  the  Spanish
         airports.

         Agreed to this 6th day of October, 2003.

         HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. by                 Aena, by



         /s/ Bogdan C. Maglich                          /s/ Jose Romero
         ----------------------                         ------------------------
         Bogdan C. Maglich                              Jose Romero
         Chairman and CEO                               Aeropuertos Espanoles
                                                        Central Security Office
                                                        Security Manager
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0168 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEVIN BRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 6 2022

12/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0168
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-82;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
No. 53415.

protests 144653-K and 144657-K (New York).

#### The Jos. Garneau Co., Inc., and McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 3 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 3

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  permit the Congress to limit expenditures in elections for Federal 
                                office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

   Mr. Dingell introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  permit the Congress to limit expenditures in elections for Federal 
                                office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress shall have authority to limit expenditures in 
elections for Federal office.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 59946.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 171982-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust, Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 57891.

#### Peterson Export Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 178480-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper napkins the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56835, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53424.

protests 147853-K and 147815-K (New York).

#### Armour & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ox gall the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2014

NO. 03-14-00244-CR

Elias Shawn Bihl aka Elias Bihl, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
Before the First Division,

January 16, 1951

No. 55115.

#### Arico, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 155554-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 10.57



SCHEDULE OF DIRECTOR FEES



Annual Retainers



| |  |  | Non-Employee Directors: $45,000
| | - |  | -------------------------------



| |  |  | Audit Committee Members: $10,000
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | Nominating & Governance Committee Members: $5,000
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Compensation Committee Members: $5,000
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



Fees for Meeting Attendance



| |  |  | Board Meetings: $2,000 per meeting
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | Committee Meetings: $2,000 per meeting
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



Equity Compensation for Non-Employee Directors



| |  |  | Annual grant of 2,500 shares of restricted stock
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Annual grant of 5,000 stock options
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | Initial grant of 5,000 shares of restricted stock
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Apparel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2008 and as amended by this Amendment No. 1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (together, the Report), I, Dov Charney, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Date: March 28, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Dov Charney                      
|Dov Charney                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 53396.

protests 110956-K, etc. (Louisville).

#### Harmar Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), thq claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

A.O., the mother and D.S., the father

, Appellant s ,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM, Appellee s

.

No s . 4D 21

- 1006 and 21

- 1086

[ August 3 1 , 2021 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jose Izquierdo , Judge; L.T. Case No.

2019

- 3399

- CJ

- DP

.

Lori D. Shelby, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant A.O., the mother.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, an d Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant D.S., the father.

Carolyn Schwarz of Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee for Department of Child ren and Families.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorney, Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem o/b/o B.E.S. and B.A.S.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, C IKLIN and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<page>


                                  Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group Corp.
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, David Wu,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


February 14, 2007


                                                   By:/s/ David Wu
                                                   -------------------
                                                     David Wu, CEO