alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Adam Kablanian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Adam A. Kablanian
Before the First Division,

March 24, 1955

No. 58859.

protests 223474-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
```

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Tele Centro Oeste Celular Participacoes S.A.
SCN Q.02 Bloco C, 226 - 6 andar
Brasilia- DF

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of our report dated
January 31, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tele
Centro Oeste Celular Participacoes S.A., prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in Brazil for the year ended December 31, 2001,
which appears in such Annual Report.

                 Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S.C.

                             /s/ Luiz Carlos Nannini
                                     Partner

Brasilia, Brazil

June 24, 2002
```
(Reap. Dec. 10917)

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 16527; 3376; 14223.

(Decided March 16, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (See. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

*560Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. §162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

To Whom it May Concern: 

Richard Miller <rjm2429@gmail.com> 

Tuesday, November 12, 2013 1:44 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Makani Kai EAS 

Makani Kai is the best air carrier we have ever had in Kalaupapa. 

They are courteous, on time, and reasonably priced. Please award the EAS to Makani Kai. 

Richard Miller 

1 

- 1 :
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 93 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 272
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 93

    Designating the week beginning November 23, 1997, and the week 
 beginning on November 22, 1998, as ``National Family Week'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 1997

 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Burns, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. 
 D'Amato, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Frist, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Helms, 
  Mr. Lugar, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
  Akaka, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
   Robb, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Coats, Mr. Cochran, Mr. 
    Craig, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. 
  Kempthorne, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Specter, Mr. 
Breaux, Mr. Conrad, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Ford, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Inouye, 
 Mr. Kohl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
Moynihan, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Reid, 
 and Mr. Bryan) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            November 6, 1997

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning November 23, 1997, and the week beginning on 
        November 22, 1998, as ``National Family Week'', and for other purposes.
Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly society;
Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family unit as essential to the continued 
        well-being of the United States; and
Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the importance of 
        family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the week beginning on November 
23, 1997 and the week beginning on November 22, 1998, as ``National 
Family Week''. The Senate requests the President to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe each 
week with appropriate ceremonies and activities
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 272

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               S. RES. 93

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Designating the week beginning November 23, 1997, and the week 
 beginning on November 22, 1998, as ``National Family Week'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 6, 1997

                       Reported without amendment
```
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belair Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                        
|   



|Date: July 13, 2007
|-------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. Frenette
Andrew C. Frenette
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

32
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20085 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ERIC DANIEL MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-178-ALL

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eric Daniel Morales, former federal prisoner # 10876-179, appeals from the 11-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III, § 2, of the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. See Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversyNo. 05-20085 -2- requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the now-ended incarceration or parole -- some ‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction -- must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id. Morales has served the sentence that was imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. The order revoking Morales’s term of supervised release imposed no further term of supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for this court to address, and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jack Ferguson, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                               
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    JACK FERGUSON                                                          
|                   |  |  |  | Jack Ferguson Executive
Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2





                        CHESTER VALLEY BANCORP TO PRESENT
                         AT MID-ATLANTIC SUPER-COMMUNITY
                                 BANK CONFERENCE


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2002

CONTACT:    MARTY GRUSZKA
            FIRST FINANCIAL BANK
            (610) 269-9700

Downingtown, PA: Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ: CVAL), parent company of
First Financial Bank and Philadelphia Corporation for Investment Services, will
be speaking to an audience of institutional investors, high net worth
individuals and analysts from leading brokerage firms in Baltimore, MD on
October 30th. President and CEO Donna Coughey and CFO Albert Randa will be
presenting for the Company. They will be joined by a prestigious group of 19
other institutions from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland and Virginia.

"This is a great opportunity to make more investors aware of the value that the
Company provides, and the timing is remarkable," stated Donna Coughey, President
and CEO. The Company released their fiscal year-end 2002 performance in July and
quarter-end results on October 22nd, reporting continued strong earnings. "Our
excellent performance is the result of a focus on business clients, wealth
management, customer service and our community. We believe this direction will
bring us success as we continue to grow in the coming years."

The Conference will be webcast and may be accessed at
http://www.super-communitybanking.com/. To hear the broadcast, go to the website
--------------------------------------
at least fifteen minutes early to download and install any necessary software.
The Company's broadcast is scheduled for October 30th at 8:00 am.


Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. is the parent company of First Financial Bank and
Philadelphia Corporation for Investment Services ("PCIS"). First Financial
Bank's executive offices are located in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, with nine
branch offices throughout Chester County. PCIS is a securities broker/dealer and
investment advisor with offices in Wayne and Philadelphia. First Financial Bank
and PCIS can be found on the World Wide Web at www.FFBonline.com and
www.PCISonline.com, respectively. The Company's stock is traded on the NASDAQ
market under the symbol "CVAL".
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Huang Xiaofang, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals; 

c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and

d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting: and 

5.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
No. 57590.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. (Samuel S. Perry) *v.*United States,

protests 78771-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

*284Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked *“A”*were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753).
Before the Third Division,

April 30, 1957

(Note: The following protest was decided by a special third division, consisting of Johnson, Donlon, and Ford, Judges.)

No. 60713.

#### Bercut-Vandervoort & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 192782-K (San Francisco).

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of 94.4 proof London dry gin, exported from England on or about August 23, 1951, placed in Foreign Trade Zone No. 3 at San Francisco, and entered for consumption on August 19, 1952. It was assessed with duty at the rate of $1.25 per proof gallon under paragraph 802 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and with internal revenue tax at the rate of $10.50 per wine gallon under section 2800 (a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as amended by 65 Stat. 524. No question has been raised as to the rate or amount of duty or as to the rate of internal revenue tax, but it is claimed that, in view of Articles II and III of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, the tax imposed should not exceed that imposed in respect of the like domestic product and that it should have been assessed on the basis of the proof gallon and not the wine gallon.

This case was tried with protest No. 192781-K, although the cases were not consolidated, and the briefs submitted cover both cases.

The issues involved in this case are the same as those before us in *Bercut-Vandervoort & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*protest No. 192781-K, decided concurrently herewith (C. D. 1877). For the reasons stated in our decision in that case, the protest herein is overruled. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

DISSENTING OPINION

Donlon, Judge:

While there is some indication in the record that plaintiff may have thought the issues in this case are not the same as those in *Bercut-Vandervoort & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*protest No. 192781-K, decided concurrently herewith (C. D. 1877), I agree with the majority that the record as a whole confirms that the issues in the two cases are the same. For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in that case, I dissent from the decision of the majority here.

The case should be restored to calendar to permit the parties to develop the record and argue as to application of tax, in conformity with section 615 of the Revenue Act of 1951.
Exhibit 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


In connection with this Annual Report of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Rapino, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:June 29, 2016By:/s/ Michael RapinoMichael RapinoPresident and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,299
<PP&E>                                         280,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,517
<BONDS>                                        290,696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    201,998
<COMMON>                                         3,364
<OTHER-SE>                                   (262,325)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,889
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,308
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,881)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (40,881)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)


</TABLE>