alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Eric J. Rhett, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

U.S. District Court et al., 

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

AUG 2 0 2010 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

10 1409 

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the informa pauperis 

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading 

requirements of Rule 8( a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 

656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires 

complaints to contain "( 1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction 

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 

F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair 

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate 

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 
] • t! 

Plaintiff, a resident of Rahway, New Jersey, sues New Jersey-based defendants, including 

the United States District Court in Newark. He also sues the Social Security Administration 

("SSA") in New York, New York. See CompI. Caption at 1-2. The complaint consists mostly of 

disjointed statements that fail to provide any notice of a claim. To the extent that plaintiff is 

seeking judicial review of an SSA determination, he must bring such an action "in the district 

court of the United States for the judicial district in which [he] resides," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), 

which is the District of New Jersey. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this 

Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: August R, 2010 

2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5

                         [O'CONNOR CAVANAGH LETTERHEAD]

                                  JUNE 8, 1998



Bionutrics, Inc.
2425 East Camelback Road, Suite 650
Phoenix, Arizona   85016

                  RE:      REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  As special legal counsel to Bionutrics, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), we have assisted in the preparation of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed on or about June 8,
1998 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Registration Statement"),
in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of 1,039,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, of the
Company (the "Shares") issuable pursuant to the Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan
(the "Plan"). The facts, as we understand them, are set forth in the
Registration Statement.

                  With respect to the opinion set forth below, we have examined
originals, certified copies, or copies otherwise identified to our satisfaction
as being true copies, only of the following:

                       A. The Articles of Incorporation of the Company as
amended and initially filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada
on October 22, 1990.

                       B. The Bylaws of the Company, as amended through the date
hereof;

                       C. The Registration Statement;

                       D. The Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the
Company dated June 4, 1997 relating to the approval of the filing of the
Registration Statement and the transactions in connection therewith;
<PAGE>   2
O'CONNOR CAVANAGH


Bionutrics, Inc.
June 5, 1998
Page 2

                  Subject to the assumptions that (i) the documents and
signatures examined by us are genuine and authentic and (ii) the persons
executing the documents examined by us have the legal capacity to execute such
documents, and subject to the further limitations and qualifications set forth
below, it is our opinion that the Shares, when issued and sold in accordance
with the terms of the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.

                  Please be advised that we are members of the State Bar of
Arizona, and our opinion is limited to the legality of matters under the laws of
the State of Arizona and the General Corporation Laws of the State of Nevada.
Further, our opinion is based solely upon existing laws, rules and regulations,
and we undertake no obligation to advise you of any changes that may be brought
to our attention after the date hereof.

                  We hereby expressly consent to any reference to our firm in
the Registration Statement, inclusion of this Opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement, and to the filing of this Opinion with any other
appropriate governmental agency.

                                             Very truly yours,
No. 67275.

protest 293361-K (Los Angeles).

#### George J. Young, a/c Fisherman’s Cooperative Association of San Pedro *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of marión, nylon, or livlon fish netting similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 63947, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 23.2





C ONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS











We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No 333-190459), and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-175139, 333-164507, 333-164494, 333-164302, 333-157664, 333-149901, 333-132949,  and 333-206294) of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., of our reports dated June 21, 2016 and June 27, 2014 relating to the financial statements of Venta de Boletos por Computadora, S.A. de C.V., which appears in this Form 10-K.








PricewaterhouseCoopers S.C.





/s/ Arturo Martinez Mojica


Arturo Martinez Mojica


Mexico City, Mexico


June 21, 2016
Before the First Division,

August 1, 1949

No. 53432.

protest 138771-K (New York).

#### Freedman & Slater, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Ridge Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
A. Kelleher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company as of and for the periods covered in the report.

/s/ Patrick A. Kelleher
Patrick A. Kelleher
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003