alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 60699.

#### Bluefries New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 278716-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 6 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|   |   | CENVEO,      INC.                                       |   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | (Exact      Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) |   |   |

| Colorado                      |   | 1-12551           |   | 84-1250533               |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| (State      of Incorporation) |   | (Commission       |   | (IRS      Employer       |
|                          |   | File      Number) |   | Identification      No.) |

| One      Canterbury Green, 201 Broad Street, Stamford, CT |   | 06901           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
| (Address      of Principal Executive Offices)             |   | (Zip      Code) |

|   |   | Not      Applicable                                               |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Former      name or former address, if changed since last report) |   |   |

| [      ] | Written      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR      230.425) |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| [      ] | Soliciting      material pursuant to Rule 14a−12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.14a−12) |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| [      ] | Pre−commencement      communications pursuant to Rule 14d−2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.14d−2(b)) |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| [      ] | Pre−commencement      communications pursuant to Rule 13e−4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.13e−4(c)) |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

|   | CENVEO,      INC. |                         |
|--------|-------------------|------------------------------|
|   |              |                         |   |
|   | By:               | /s/      Mark S. Hiltwein    |   |
|   |              | Mark      S. Hiltwein        |   |
|   |              | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|   |              |                         |   |

----
Order entered April 13, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00102 - CV ESTATE OF FREDERIC B . ASCHE, JR., DECEAS ED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 11 - 3533 - 2



### O RDE R We GRANT the April 11, 2016 motion of court reporter Terri Etekochay for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed by APRIL 15, 2016
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
부동산압류를 피하는 

10가지 팁 

현재 재정적인 어려움을 겪는 경우, 다음 10가지 팁을 통해

부동산압류를 피할 수 있습니다.

1. 문제의 초기 징후 인식.

실직, 이혼, 투병 등을 겪어서 담보대출

상환이 걱정된다면 두려워하지 말고 도움을

요청하세요.

2. 대출업체에 즉시 연락.

대출업체는 귀하의 주택을 원하지 않습니다.

대출업체는 귀하가 주택을 유지할 수 있도록

도와주기를 원합니다. 재정적 어려움의

첫 번째 징후가 나타나면 매달 귀하가

담보대출상환액을 보내는 기관인 대출업체(

담보대출 관리 회사라고 함)에 연락하세요.

대출업체와 함께 귀하의 옵션을 탐색할 수

있습니다.

3. 주어진 옵션 이해하기.

연방 담보대출 조정 프로그램에 따른 조정을

포함한 부동산압류 방지 옵션의 자격이

될 수 있습니다. 대출업체에 전화하거나

888-995-HOPE(4673)에 전화하여 자격

여부를 확인하세요.

4. 지출 우선순위 정하기.

케이블 TV, 회원권, 오락 비용 등

필수적이지 않은 비용을 줄이세요. 다시

상황이 나아지면, 귀하의 지출 계획에

일부 비용을 다시 추가하는 것을 고려할 수

있습니다.

5. 대출업체의 모든 서신을 확인하고 회신하기.

가능한 경우, 대출업체가 귀하의 집을

지키도록 도와줄 수 있습니다. 대출업체의

모든 서신에 주의를 기울이고 가능한 한

빨리 회신하세요.

6. 나의 담보대출 권리 알기.

대출 서류를 찾아서 주의 깊게 읽고 해당

주의 부동산압류에 관한 법률 및 일정을

조사하세요. 평판이 좋은 주택상담 기관은

귀하가 서류와 옵션을 이해하는 데 도움을

줄 수 있습니다.

7. 사기 주의하기.

담보대출 상환이 늦어지면 사기꾼이 귀하를

노릴 수 있습니다. 자격 증명, 평판, 경험을

주의 깊게 확인하고 대출업체와 항상

개인적으로 연락하세요. 대출업체야말로

귀하를 도울 수 있는 가장 좋은

사람들입니다.

8. 선불 수수료 지급 피하기.

주택상담 또는 대출 조정에 대해 선불

수수료를 지불하지 마세요. 연방 담보대출

조정 프로그램을 포함하여 이용 가능한

대부분의 부동산압류에 대한 대안은 선불

수수료 없이 귀하에게 도움을 제공합니다.

9. 주택상담사에게 연락하기.

적법한 상담사를 찾으려면 미국 주택 도시

개발부(800 -569-4287)로 전화하거나

www.makinghomeaffordable.gov /를

방문하세요. 주택상담 기관은 귀하가 도움을

얻기 위한 옵션을 이해하도록 돕고 지원을

받기 위한 다음 단계를 설명할 수 있습니다.

10.대출업체와 함께 작성한 계획에 전념하기.

귀하를 위한 최선의 선택이 대출조건

조정이든 대출업체를 통해 이용 가능한 여러

가지 다른 해결책이든 간에, 함께 작성한

계획에 따라 진행하기 위해 대출업체와

긴밀히 협력해야 합니다.

여기에 로고와 연락처 정보를 넣으세요.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

September 24, 2001


                      Re: Amendment of Employment Agreement

Dear Steve,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the Employment Agreement dated as
of September 1, 2000, by and between you and PolyMedica Corporation (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of December 14,
2000 and April 16, 2001 (together, the "Employment Agreement").

          Term of Employment. The Employment Period, as defined in Section 2 of
          the Employment Agreement, is extended to August 31, 2002.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Steven J. Lee
------------------------
Steven J. Lee
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

/s/ Stephen C. Farrell
------------------------
Stephen C. Farrell
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7233

JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DOE, Republic Tobacco Company; JOHN DOE, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2786-6-20) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Douglas Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. William AlexanderCoates, LOVE, THORNTON, ARNOLD & THOMASON, Greenville, South Carolina; Lewis Walter Tollison, III, Rivers Samuel Stilwell, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Douglas Alexander appeals the district court’s orderdenying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Alexander v. Doe , No. CA-97-2786-6-20 (D.S.C. July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case No. 9,671.

#### MITCHELL v. WILSON.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 92.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May, 1827.

Replevin —No Appearance — Excuse—Neglect 1 ■ of Defendant’s Counsel — Discontinuance.

" 1. If the defendant in replevin does not appear ■at the return of the writ, and the plaintiff takes no step to obtain an appearance at that term, the cause is discontinued, and the clerk will not bring ■ it .forward upon the docket of the next .term,-and the court will not reinstate the cause at the subsequent term, although the defendant’s attorney make affidavit that he was employed by tiie defendant to appear for him at the preceding term, and promised and intended so to do, and thought he had done so, but finds his appearance was not entered, and presumes it was because he had forgotten to give the order to the clerk; and although the defendant make oath that, be- ' fore the sitting of the last court he went to the ■ clerk’s office, and informed one of the clerks that , he should defend the said suit, and that Mr. Key ■ was his attorney.

*2,*After the discontinuance of the replevin, the goods are no longer in the custody of the law, and. the defendant is not guilty of a contempt in taking possession of them.

Replevin for a negro woman named Ma-hala.

The defendant [William Wilson] did not ap*524pear at the last term (to which term the writ was returnable), and the plaintiff [Thomas L. Mitchell] took no step to obtain an appearance; no continuance was entered or ordered, and the clerk did not bring the cause forward upon the docket of this term, considering it as discontinued; and of that opinion was THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent). It did not appear to be the misprision of the clerk. The court had decided the point in some previous cases.

Mr. Key

moved the court to reinstate the cause and to order it to be brought forward upon the docket of the present term, and made affidavit that he was employed by the defendant to appear for him in the suit, at the last term, and promised, and intended to do so, and thought he had done so, but finds that his appearance was not entered; and presumes it arose from his forgetting to give the order to the clerk. The defendant Wilson also made affidavit that before the sitting of the last court, he went to -the clerk’s offiee and informed one of the clerks that he should defend the said suit and that Mr. Key was his attorney.

But THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent), refused to reinstate the cause.

Mr.. Coxe, for plaintiff,

moved for an attachment of contempt against the defendant, for having since the last term taken possession of the replevied goods.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Crunch, Chief Judge.]

But THE COURT refused; being of opinion that when the action of replevin was discontinued,- the goods were no longer in the custody of the law,*,-..-

[For subsequent proceedings in this case, see Case No. 9,672.]
Exhibit
      13.2


Section
      906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of QI Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20F
      for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Mclean, Jr.
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      December 14, 2006


/s/
                Robert I. McLean Jr.Name:
            Robert
                I. Mclean Jr.Title:
            Chief
                Financial Officer and Chief Operating
                Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             527
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             408
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,328
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         25,024
<ALLOWANCE>                                         36
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,724
<DEPOSITS>                                      24,841
<SHORT-TERM>                                       500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                223
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           805
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  33,724
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,505
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  252
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    74
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,831
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 920
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 954
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              877
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    177
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       132
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.84
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        11
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    30
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   36
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                36
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
(the "Report"), I, Robert C. Hamilton, the President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



          1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Robert C. Hamilton
-------------------------------
Robert C. Hamilton, President

Date:  November 14, 2003





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             28.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1127

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude income from the

transportation of oil and gas by pipeline from subpart F income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1999

Mr. MCCRERY (for himself and Mr. WATKINS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

income from the transportation of oil and gas by pipeline

from subpart F income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF PIPELINE

4 TRANSPORTATION INCOME.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 954(g)(1) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining foreign base company oil

7 related income) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end

8 of subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end

9 of subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by inserting

10 after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph:
2

•HR 1127 IH

1 ‘‘(C) the pipeline transportation of oil or

2 gas within such foreign country.’’

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section shall apply to taxable years of controlled for5 eign corporations beginning after December 31, 1999, and

6 taxable years of United States shareholders with or within

7 which such taxable years of controlled foreign corporations

8 end.

Æ
Before the Third Division,

October 7, 1952

No. 56888.

#### W. C. Johnson *v.*United States,

protests 41299-K, 41300-K, and 41306-K (Providence).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.
Exhibit 99.1


[LOGO] OPTION ONE                                               [LOGO] H&R BLOCK
       MORTGAGE

       an H&R BLOCK company

March 10, 2006


Financial Asset Securities Corp.
600 Steamboat Road
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
Attention: Legal

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
1761 East St. Andrew Place
Santa Ana, California 92705-4934
Attention: Trust Administration GC05O2

Moody's Investor Service, Inc.
99 Church Street
New York, NY 10007
Attention: MBS Monitoring/Option One

Standard & Poor's Rating Services, Inc.
55 Water Street
New York, NY 10004
Inv#386

Re:   Annual Officer's Certificate

      Pursuant to Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated and
effective as of August 1, 2005, among Financial Asset Securities Corp., as
Depositor, Option One Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, and Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company, as Trustee, (the "Servicing Agreement"), enclosed is the
required officer's certificate of compliance.

If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Nguyen at (949) 727-8226 or
email: Elizabeth.Nguyen@oomc.com


Option One Mortgage Corporation
6501 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618


www.optiononeonline.com
                     6501 Irvine Center Drive o Irvine o California o 92618-2304
                                        o 949.790.3600 o Fax 949.790.8581 [LOGO]

<page>


                           OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                        ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE SERVICER


      I, Fabiola Camperi, the duly appointed Chief Servicing Officer of Option
One Mortgage Corporation, the Servicer, hereby certify that (i) a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 and
of performance under the Servicing Agreement, as defined in the cover letter,
has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Servicing Agreement during such year.

                                    By: /s/ Fabiola Camperi
                                        --------------------------
                                    Name: Fabiola Camperi
                                    Title: Chief Servicing Officer
                                    Date: February 28, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 30, 2012 

t0123 

Order 

 

January 30, 2012 

143331 

CONWAY DAVIS, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v SC: 143331 

 COA: 300440 

Wayne CC: 10-004690-AE 

ASSOCIATED COMMUNITY SERVICES, 

Respondent-Appellee, 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR AND 

ECONOMIC GROWTH UNEMPLOYMENT 

INSURANCE AGENCY, 

Agency-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2001 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group
Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Wu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


May 18, 2007


                                        By: /s/ David Wu
                                        ----------------
                                        David Wu, CEO
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Dragon International
Group Corp. on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Wu,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


November 10, 2005


                                                 By:/s/ David Wu
                                                        David Wu, CEO
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00325

- CV

J. G. , Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2021

- 0046C , THE HONORABLE DEBORAH WIGINGTON , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM Appellant J. G. filed his notice of appeal on June 1, 2022 . The appellate record was complete on June 22, 2022 , making appellant’s brief due on July 12, 2022

. On July 8, 2022 , counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days fo r court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order James B. Peplinski to file appellant’s brief no later than August 1, 2022 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on July 15, 2022

.2 Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly