alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Letterhead of PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS]                  Exhibit 99.2b




                         Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of GMAC Mortgage Corporation:


We have examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its
 subsidiaries (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
 identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying
 management assertion (See Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the
 Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
 Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was performed in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
 our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
 minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
 aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
 December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP


March 21, 2006




[Letterhead of GMAC Mortgage]

                                                              Exhibit 1


                          Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                            with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards


March 21, 2006


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, GMAC Mortgage Corporation
 and its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects
 with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
 Bankers ("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond
 and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $350,000,000 and
$100,000,000, respectively.



/s/ Jim Hillsman
---------------------------
Chief Operating Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Dave Bricker
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Tony Renzi
---------------------------
Executive Vice President,
National Servicing Administration
GMAC Residential Holding Corp
#### [Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company Letterhead]

## Exhibit 32(b)

#### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen W. Ritchie,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Allen W. Ritchie
Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Jack Ferguson, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 07, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Jack Ferguson                                                         
|                      |  |  |  | Jack FergusonExecutive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
### Good Neighbor Environmental Board **Hotel Encanto de Las Cruces 705 South Telshor Blvd**  **Las Cruces, New Mexico 88011** 

**575 -** **522 -** **4300** 

### AGENDA **Thursday, September 8th**  8 :0 0 a.m . **Registration** 8 :3 0 - 9:00 **Welcome and Introductions**
 **Mark Joyce** Associate Dire ctor and Acting Designated Federal Officer Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach US Environmental Protection Agency
 **Cynthia Jones -** 

**Jackson** Acting Director Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach US Environmental Protection Agency
 **Diane Austin** Acting Chair Good Neighbor Environmental Board
 **Sharon Thomas** Mayor Pro -Tem Las Cruces, New Mexico 9:00 - 10:30 **Economic Opportunities in the US**  **- Mexico Border Region** 
 **Pricilla C .**  **Lucero** Executive Director Southwest New Mexico Council of Governments **Jo Anne Shelby** Plant Manager Compass Manufacturing Services
 **Linda Smrkovsky** Executive Director Deming Luna County Economic Development, Inc. 10:30 - 10:45 **Break** 10:45 - 12:15 **Community Impacts in**  **the US -** **Mexico Border Region**
 **Jeremy Turner**  Executive Director New Mexico Renewable Energy Transmission Authority
 **Karyn Stockdale** Vice President and Executive Director New Mexico Audubon Society
 **Clay Doyle** Vice President of Transmission and Distribution El Paso Electric Company 12 : 15 - 12: 45 **Public Comments**  12 : 45 -2:00 **Lunch** 2:0 0 -3: 3 0 **Discussion of 14 th**  **Report** 3: 3 0 -3: 4 5 **Break** 3: 45 - 6 :00 **Discussion of 14**  **th Report**  6 : 0 0 p.m. **Adjourn**

## Meeting Day **2**

**Friday, September 9th**  8:30 - 9 :00 **Duncan Wood**

Professor, Instituto Tecnológico Aut ónomo de México Senior Advisor for the Renewable Energy Initiative Mexico Institute of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars 9:00 - 9:30 **Discussion of Next Meeting and Other Business** 
 Washington, DC – D ecember 14 - 15 9:30 - 11:00 **Disc ussion**  **of 14 th**  **Report** 11:00 - 11:15 **Break** 11:15 - 1:30 **Discussion of 14**  **th Report**  1 :30 -2 :00 **Public Comments** 2 :00 p.m. **Adjourn**
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 682 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 682

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 10, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (S. 139) to implement the use of Rapid DNA 
instruments to inform decisions about pretrial release or detention and their 
conditions, to solve and prevent violent crimes and other crimes, to exonerate 
the innocent, to prevent DNA analysis backlogs, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in 
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-
53 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Permanent 
Select Committee on Intelligence and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) 
the further amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, if offered by the Member designated in the report, 
which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall be 
considered as read, shall be separately debatable for the time specified in the 
report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and 
shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question; and (3) one 
motion to commit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. D-81.

#### In re Disbarment of Darrow.

It is ordered that Charles M. Darrow, of Painesville, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Order entered December 22, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00868
- CV DON A. MITCHELL, Appellant

V. FREESE & GOSS, PLLC, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 08251



### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s December 18, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief. Appellant shall file a reply brief by JANUARY 11, 2016

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                  0
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     514,557
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                        49,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  778,957
<PP&E>                             62,552
<DEPRECIATION>                    140,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,377,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,801,333
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                            9,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                         1,882
<OTHER-SE>                      2,537,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,377,394
<SALES>                           904,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  904,536
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                7,581,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 28,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (6,705,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                    (46,797)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (6,752,404)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.83)


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alternet Systems, Inc.
  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.

|Dated: January 18, 2007 | By: | /s/
      Griffin Jones                     
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Griffin Jones                               
|                        |     | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, CEO
|                        |     | Secretary & Director                        

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12 th day of October , 2018

, following consider ation of the

response s to this Court’s Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed

on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute. It is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action

by thi s Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; and

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County shall

enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s clients or

fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g).

In the event that Respondent fully complies with the ODC’s records requests, he

can s eek dissolution or amendment of this order , or request accelerated disposition of

the charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6).

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

Petitioner

v.

DORY L. SATER

,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2530 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 157 DB 2018

Attorney Reg. No. 83783

(D elaware County)
Exhibit 31.01

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Dinesh Maniar, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ Dinesh Maniar
-----------------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1

                 Premier Bank's 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan


     Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 to the company's Registration
Statement No. 333-34243 on Form S-4 filed with the SEC on August 22,1997 and
amended on September 9, 1997.



<PAGE>
Before the First Division,

October 14, 1954

No. 58422.

protest 225540-K (New York).

#### The Wing On Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

*376Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C) D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in this dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------


     In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of ebank Financial Services, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                                 /s/ Wayne W. Byers
                                               -----------------------
                                               Wayne W. Byers
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               November 14, 2003


<PAGE>
No. 50312.

#### Protests 54348-K, etc., of Davidow, Inc., Sportswear et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

INDASIA UNDERWOOD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4525 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 24, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
CASANUEVA, Judge.

In this Anders 1 appeal, Indasia Underwood appeals an order of revocation of community control and a judgment and sentence for one count of unlawful possession of the personal identification information of another (five or more). We affirm the judgment, sentence, and order of revocation without comment.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).- 2 - After sentencing, Ms. Underwood filed a pro se motion for mitigation and reduction of sentence and subsequently filed a pro se notice of appeal. After the notice of appeal was filed, the trial court entered an order denying the motion for mitigation and reduction of sentence. The trial court was without jurisdiction to consider the motion after the notice of appeal was filed. See Othouse v. State, 912 So. 2d 682, 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). The trial court should have dismissed the motion rather than deny it. See Hawthorne v. State, 226 So. 3d 292, 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("Because the filing of a notice of appeal divests the trial court of jurisdiction, the trial court should have dismissed the motion on that basis instead of denying it."). Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to vacate the order denying the motion for mitigation and reduction of sentence and enter an order dismissing the motion for lack of jurisdiction. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Ms. Underwood may have to raise this issue in a timely motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(c).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.