alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certifications
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Vector Intersect Security Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.

Date: April 14, 2008

/s/ Yaron EitanYaron EitanChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial officer)


---
i

\

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

NBS PROJECT

0201-30-2320 June 23, 1954

stenc; f WU-t * mn -

•• - EPORT -3J irf IBS

twoREPORTi • v 3 v" ft 33

5

?“

QUALIFICATION TEST

OF

115 “DURA11 LAMPS

Made for

Specifications Branch, Standards Division

(Attention: Mr. Paul K. Miller)

Federal Supply Service

General Services Administration

Room 7010 GSA Building

Washington 25, D. C.

by

W. A. Roche

S. W. Wilson

J. E. Jordan

Photometry and Colorimetry Section

Optics and Metrology Division

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

The publication, re, APProved for public release by the

unless permission is Director of the National Institute of

25,d.c. Suchper Standards and Technology (NIST)

cally prepared If t On October 9, 2015

in part, is prohibited andards, Washington

port has been specifisport for its own use.

)
•' . j 
Qualification Test

of

115 “Dura11 Lamps

by

Wo A. Roche

S. W. Wilson

and

J. S. Jordan

1.

PURPOSE OF TEST

The purpose of this test is to determine compliance

with paragraph F-6b of Federal Specification W-L-122 and

Amendment-3 of photographic flash lamps manufactured by

the Dura Electric Lamp Co., Inc,, Newark, New Jersey.

2.

MATERIAL

Twenty- three each of five types of photographic flash

lamps were selected by a Government lamp inspector at the

factory of the Dura Electric Lamp Co., Inc., Newark, New

Jersey on May 25, 1954. The lamps were received at this

Bureau on May 27, 1954. All of the lamps were discarded

at the conclusion of the test.

3

METHOD

The test was made in accordance with the provisions

of Federal Specification W-L-122 dated February 2, 1945 and

Amendment-3 dated May 26, 1952.

4.

RESULTS

The test results are as follows:

Type

No.

3A

5

11

22

50

Number Number Outside

Tested Specification Limits

23 1

23 6

23 3

23 3

23 0

5.

REMARKS

In accordance with the requirement of paragraph

F-6b(3) of Federal Specification W-L-122 and Amendment=3,

the Dura Electric Lamp Co., Inc. has qualified to have

its bid for photographic flash lamps considered by the

Federal Supply Service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         43,489
<SECURITIES>                                   18,452
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                    2,701
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              118,153
<PP&E>                                         18,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                128,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38,498
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          444
<OTHER-SE>                                     89,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  128,310
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               69,436
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (1,863)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  577
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   673
<INCOME-TAX>                                      323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               350
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      350
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .01


</TABLE>
<PAGE>




                                                                   Exhibit 99(a)
                                                              Form 10-K for 2000
                                                              File No. 333-74847

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors
The CIT Group, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion that Capita Corporation (the "Company")
maintained effective controls over servicing leases and loans subject to the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2000 for the CIT
Equipment Collateral 2000-2 (the "Servicing Agreement") for the period from
September 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000. This assertion is included in the
accompanying report by management titled "Capita Corporation Management
Assertion." Management is responsible for its controls over its lease and loan
servicing. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the controls over Capita Corporation's lease and
loan servicing, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
those controls, and such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any control, errors or fraud may occur and
not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the controls over the
lease and loan servicing to future periods are subject to the risk that the
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the controls may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Capita Corporation maintained
effective controls over lease and loan servicing as required under the Servicing
Agreement for the period from September 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000, is
fairly stated in all material respects, based upon the stated criteria set forth
in Exhibit I "Capita Corporation Stated Lease/Loan Servicing Control Criteria"
of management's report.

S/KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
April 13, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 94-KP-00843-SCT FOREST A. HENLEY, JR.
v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7/11/94 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN B. TONEY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PRO SE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: DEIDRE MCCRORY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN KITCHENS NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 4/3/97 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE PRATHER, P.J., ROBERTS AND MILLS, JJ.
PRATHER, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

Forrest A. Henley, Jr., appeals the denial of post-conviction relief (PCR) from the revocation of his probation for a suspended sentence on fifteen counts of forgery. Henley's probation was revoked because he tested positive for cocaine, failed to report to his probation officer, failed to make restitution, and fled from the Jackson police during the course of committing a criminal act. Henley raises the following issues for consideration by this Court: I. Whether Henley's probation was erroneously revoked without the benefit of legal counsel? II. Whether Henley was denied his right to due process? III. Whether the trial court erred in allowing hearsay evidence to be presented?IV. Whether the hearing was erroneously held without a presentence investigation report?

V. Whether the court erred in failing to instruct the probation officer of Henley's rights?

VI. Whether the original sentence in this case was in violation of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-33? Henley is procedurally barred from raising each of these issues because he failed to raise them at the revocation hearing. See Brandau v. State , 662 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Miss. 1995); Brooks v. State , 573 So. 2d 1350, 1353 (Miss. 1990). In addition, the PCR statutes provide that failure to raise an objection before the trial judge bars raising the issue in the PCR motion, unless the prisoner can show cause for the default and actual prejudice to his defense. Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-21 (1) (Supp. 1996). Henley has made no such showing. Furthermore, Henley's arguments are without merit. See Gagnon v. Scarpelli , 411 U.S. 778, 787-89 (1973);Berdin v. State , 648 So. 2d 73, 80 (Miss. 1994); Riely v. State , 562 So. 2d 1206, 1209 (Miss. 1990); Miss. Code Ann. §§ 47-7-3, 47-7-21, 99-39-9 (2) (Supp. 1996). For these reasons, the judgment of the trial court denying Henley's motion for post-conviction relief from the revocation of Henley's probation is affirmed, per curiam

. DENIAL OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED. LEE, C.J., SULLIVAN, P.J., PITTMAN, BANKS, McRAE, ROBERTS, SMITH AND MILLS, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3323-3324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1243]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Airborne Radar Altimeter Equipment (For Air Carrier Aircraft)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to cancel Technical Standard Order (TSO)-C67, 
Airborne Radar Altimeter Equipment (For Air Carrier Aircraft).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the FAA's intent to cancel TSO-C67, 
Airborne Radar Altimeter Equipment (For Air Carrier Aircraft). The 
effect of the cancelled TSO will result in no new TSO-C67 design or 
production approvals. However, cancellation will not affect any current 
production of an existing TSO authorization (TSOA). Articles produced 
under an existing TSOA can still be installed per the existing 
airworthiness approvals, and all applications for new airworthiness 
approvals will still be processed.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 22, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Albert Sayadian, AIR-130, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 470 L'Enfant Plaza, Suite 4102, Washington, DC 
20024. Telephone (202) 385-4652, fax

[[Page 3324]]

(202) 385-4651, email to: albert.sayadian@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    You are invited to comment on the cancellation of the TSO-C67 by 
submitting written data, views, or arguments to the above address. 
Comments received may be examined, both before and after the closing 
date at the above address, weekdays except federal holidays, between 
8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. The Director, Aircraft Certification Service, 
will consider all comments received on or before the closing date.

Background

    On November 15, 1960, the FAA published TSO-C67, Airborne Radar 
Altimeter Equipment (for air carrier aircraft). Since 1978, there have 
been no new applications for TSOA for TSO-C67. Our research indicates 
there are no authorized manufacturers currently manufacturing, 
advertising, or selling TSO-C67 compliant equipment. Therefore, given 
the obsolescence of the equipment, and the lack of industry interest in 
TSO-C67 product designs, we propose cancelling TSO-C67. Please note 
that TSO-C87, Airborne Low Range Radio Altimeter, is currently used for 
Radio Altimeter certification and is not affected by this action.

Susan J. M. Cabler,
Assistant Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-1243 Filed 1-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Exhibit 23.1














INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of American Apparel, Inc. on Form S-3 File No. 333-192863 and Forms S-8 File Nos. 333-175430, 333-163322 and 333-150293 of our report dated March 25, 2015, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and the related consolidated financial statement schedules of American Apparel, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and our report dated March 25, 2015 with respect to our audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of American Apparel, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Apparel, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014.








/s/ Marcum LLP





Marcum LLP


Melville, NY


March 25, 2015
# Official Journal C 333/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.333.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 333 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5414 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.333.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 333

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5414 November 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 333/01 | Final accounts of the 8th, 9th, and 10th European Development Funds — Financial year 2010 | 1 |
| 2011/C 333/02 | The Court’s Statement of Assurance on the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) to the European Parliament and the Council — Independent Auditor’s Report | 232 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 333/01

Final accounts of the 8th, 9th, and 10th European Development Funds — Financial year 2010

1

2011/C 333/02

The Court’s Statement of Assurance on the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) to the European Parliament and the Council — Independent Auditor’s Report

232

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1. Aircraft secure

– activate ac alarm

2. Batteries 100% only

3. Configuration

- FC/Tx, F/S and parameters iPhone App

4. Frequencies, RF Explorer leave on for 10 min while prep

5. Switches: IOC, Flight Mode, F/S

6. Throttle off

7. Turn transmitter on

8. Switches

9. Model profile

10. Transmitter battery > 7.7 V

11. Timer reset

12. Trims if not 0 do not fly

13. Plug in FPV monitor

14. Check FPV monitor channel

15. Plug in BTU

16. Verify green light

17. Ensure BTU is facing up

18. Clear area

19. Set aircraft on level platform

20. Plu g

- in aircraft: AC alarm, GPS 1 and 2, Start HITEC Tele record

21. Start timer 22. LED satellite receive no red

23. Satellite number through Mobil App , minimum seven

24. Bluetooth connection through Mobil App , minimum two

25. 2.4 GHz connection to aircraft through Mobil App , minimum four

26. Set home position

27. Flight mode switch

- cycle

28. Flight controls free and correct

29. Range check of Tx and FPV video

30. Mission Check Settings altitude, location, speed, and hover

- time

31. Clear area

– ‘Launching’

32. Launch

33. Check flight controls, stability and GPS loc k in the air

34. Last check on mission parameters: Height, Speed, Hover

- Time,

Distance

35. GO mission

- ready on flight mode: attitude or manual



### 1. Unplug batteries

2. Check battery levels and note

3. Camera off

4. Camera lens cover on

5. Secure aircraft

6. Turn transmitter off

7. Charge batteries



### 8. Post process 

### Calibrate Compass

NEW AREAS check magnetism iPhone

Remove all metal and be well away

from any metal or magnetic materials.

• Verify normal LED start sequence

• Cycle Flight Mode Switch 5 times

Manual to GPS. End on GPS.

• Rotate CW horizontally 360

around GPS antenna

• Rotate CW vertically, nose down,

360 around GPS antennaPre-Flight Checks 

## Pre

- Flight Checks

After Landing Checklist CAMERA

1. Camera ON

2. Remove Lens Cap

3. Check no record

4. Sync with GPS
Exhibit 31.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard M. Shea, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2003

                                          /s/ Richard M. Shea
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Name:  Richard M. Shea
                                          Title: Chief Operating Officer
                                                 and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99

              JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP. ANNOUNCES 2002 RESULTS

Mifflintown, PA - Francis J. Evanitsky, President & CEO of The Juniata Valley
Bank recently announced the operating results for 2002. Earnings for the year
were reported at $5,015,000 compared to $4,642,000 for 2001, this represents an
increase of 8.0%. On an earnings per share basis, the year 2002 showed $2.15 per
share in earnings versus $1.96 per share for 2001, an increase of 9.7%

Total assets increased to $375,735,000 in 2002 from $356,757,000 in 2001, an
increase of $18,978,000. Fueled by the uncertain economy and the volatile equity
market, deposits increased to $322,619,000 from $305,468,000 an increase of
$17,151,000. Total loans outstanding increased by $7,499,000 to $235,497,000 for
2002 from total outstandings of $227,998,000 in 2001.

As a result of the aforementioned loan and deposit growth, and the resulting
increase in earnings, The Juniata Valley Bank recorded a ROAA (Return on Average
Assets) of 1.37% for 2002 versus 1.33% for 2001. Additionally, ROAE (Return on
Average Equity) increased to 10.85% for 2002 from 10.47% for 2001.

Evanitsky commented "We are pleased with the results for 2002. However, it was
an extremely challenging year and all indications are that 2003 will be just as
challenging."

The Juniata Valley Bank was chartered in 1867 and has twelve banking offices
serving Juniata, Mifflin, Perry and Huntingdon Counties. More information
regarding The Juniata Valley Bank can be found online at www.jvbonline.com.
                                                         -----------------