alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Larry Monroe, Ph.D. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460



## OCT 2 12014

ChiefEnvironmental Officer Senior Vice President, Research & Environmental Affairs Southern Company 600 North 181h Street Birmingham, Alabama 57893 Dear Dr. Monroe: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

Thank you for your letter dated October 6, 2014, on behalfofSouthern Company requesting an extension ofthe closing date for receipt ofpublic comments on the supplemental proposal to address affirmative defense provisions in State Implementation Plans, issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on September 5, 2014. The EPA has considered yourrequest, buthas decided not to extend the comment period beyond the current closing date ofNovember 6, 2014. By this letter, I want to notify you ofthat decision as promptly as possible so that you can plan to submit any comments on the supplemental proposal within the time already established. We are providing a commentperiod of50 days from publication, 62 days from the date ofposting the pre-publicationversion onthe EPA website, and we believe thatthe commentperiod's current closing date allows sufficient time for all interestedparties to develop and submit comments on the supplemental proposal. We trust this timely response is helpful and look forward to receiving your comments on the supplemental proposal. Sincerely,

Janet G. McCabe Acting Assistant Administrator

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based=lnks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1J


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus/Proxy Statement constituting a
part of Futech Interactive Products, Inc. and Futech Toys and Games, Inc's
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated March 30, 1998, relating
to the financial statements of Janex International, Inc., which are contained
in the Prospectus/Proxy Statement. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
regarding uncertainty as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going
concern.


We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectus/Proxy Statement.



Woodbridge, New Jersey                                      /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
August 5, 1999
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated November 13, 1998,
except with respect to matters discussed in Note 12 to the Company's financial
statements as to which the date is December 1, 1998, included in Action
Performance Companies, Inc.'s Form 10-K/A for the year ended
September 30, 1998, and to all references to our firm included in this
registration statement.

Phoenix, Arizona                             /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
  July 8, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Dais Analytic Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy N. Tangredi, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 13, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Timothy N. Tangredi              
|                    |  |  |  | Timothy N. Tangredi                  
|                    |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
| Subsidiaries’ or Affiliate’s Name | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation orOrganization | Percentage of Ownership |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Full      Power Enterprise Global Limited                    | British      Virgin Islands                           | 100%      Direct                  |
|                                                         |                                                  |                              |
| Shenzhen      Yuzhilu Aviation Service Co., Ltd              | PRC                                                   | 100%      Indirect                |
|                                                         |                                                  |                              |
| Xian      Golden Net Travel Serve Services                   | PRC                                                   | 100%      Indirect                |
|                                                         |                                                  |                              |
| Shanghai      Lanbao Travel Service Co., Ltd                 | PRC                                                   | 100%      Indirect                |
|                                                         |                                                  |                              |
| Foshan      Overseas International Travel Service Co., Ltd.  | PRC                                                   | 100%      Indirect                |
|                                                         |                                                  |                              |
| Chongqing      Universal Travel E-Commerce Co., Ltd.         | PRC                                                   | 100%      Indirect                |
|                                                         |                                                  |                              |
| Shenzhen      Universal Travel Agency Co., Ltd.              | PRC                                                   | 100%      Indirect                |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00466-CV

Felix LUERA, Jr. and Bianca Luera,

Appellants

v.

BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Basic Energy Services, L.P., ARI Fleet Services, Inc. 

D/B/A ARI Fleet LT and Servando Garcia,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-06-52391-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporters responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal, Sonia G. 

Trevino, Sylvia Kerr, and Kim Grigg, have filed a notification of late reporter’s record, stating 

that the appellants have failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the 

reporter’s record.

We, therefore, ORDER appellants to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the reporters’ fees have been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the reporters’ fee; or (2) appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporters’ fees. If appellants fail to respond within the time provided, appellants’ brief will be 

due within thirty days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or 

points raised in appellants’ brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
AFS-12-291-E April 11, 2012

Exemption No. 10503 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0372

Ms. Dawn Moeller Parent of Zakary Moeller 8 Captolene Avenue Bloomingdale, NJ 07463

Dear Ms. Moeller:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received March 27, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Zakary Moeller for an exemp tion from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemp tion, if granted, would allow Zakary to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Zakary.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security2

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Zakary Moeller exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Zakary is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Zakary to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Zakary’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Zakary Moeller may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Zakary’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
No. 52473.

protests 135687-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gedeon Richter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
No. 52158.

protest 124049-K (New York).

#### Economu-Ritsos Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed are subject to an allowance in duties as claimed. The protest was sustained to this extent.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133305 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133306 Marilyn Kelly 133307 Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices JAMES TAYLOR, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Afradita Taylor, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 133305-133307 COA: 262763, 262771, 262777 Oakland CC: 03-053470-NH RAMALINGESWARA YALAMANCHI, M.D., R. R. YALAMANCHI, M.D., P.C., PANKAJ K. VIJ, M.D., DAVID M. MONTGOMERY, M.D., MITUL K. PATEL, M.D., GRAHAM W. LONG, M.D., and WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of May 30, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pend ing the decision in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on November 28, 2007, _ __ Mich ___ (2007), the app lication is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to ap peal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, REINST ATE the order of the Oakland Circuit Court denying defendants' motion for summary di sposition, and REMAND this case to the Oakland Court for further procee dings not inconsistent with this order and the order in
Mullins

.

l1211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 14, 2007

Clerk
Docket ID: EPA

- R06

- OAR

- 2015

- 0117

Technical Support Document Addressing Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: Texas; Houston

- Galveston

Brazoria 1997 Ozone Nonattainment Area; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 Ozone Standard

July 2015

The EPA reviewed the Houston

- Galveston

- Brazoria (HGB) area ozone monitoring data from ambient ozone monitoring stations for the ozone seasons 2012 through 2014. The 2012

- 2014 ozone season data for all the ozone monitors in the HGB area have b een quality assured and certified by the EPA. The Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) website includes monitoring data for the Texas Avenue site, but Table 1 in our proposed rule for this docket does not. 1 Data from t he Texas Avenue site is e xcluded because the site does not meet siting criteria required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix E. The TCEQ has requested National Ambient Air Quality Standards exclusion for the pollutants monitored at this site since January 2002.

1 The TCEQ ozone monitors and data are posted at https://www.tceq.texas.gov/cgi

bin/compliance/monops/8hr_attainment.pl.
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, ASAMENDED, AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. SECTION1350), M. DALE SKEEN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER OF VITRIA TECHNOLOGY,INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION (THE “COMPANY”) HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE,AS FOLLOWS:     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PERIODIC REPORT”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as ofthis 15th day of May, 2006.     /s/ M. Dale Skeen, Ph.D.     M. Dale Skeen, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Vitria Technology, Inc. and will be retained byVitria Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Vitria Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          65,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (531)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,211
<PP&E>                                           4,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (724)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,657
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,917
<SALES>                                          7,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,835
<CGS>                                            1,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,258)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,258)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

May 24, 1956

No. 59928.

#### Frankonia Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 256643-K (New York).

*437Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal toys that do not have a spring mechanism, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
October 11, 1954

No. 58427.

Suit 4789.

#### United States *v.*Esso Export Corporation.

C. D. 1535 reversed June 24, 1954. C. A. D. 569.
Exhibit 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dinesh Maniar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Dinesh Maniar
-------------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                              CERPROBE CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   Exhibit 11



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  YEARS ENDED
                                                                  DECEMBER 31,
                                                  ------------------------------------------
                                                     1998            1997           1996
                                                  -----------     -----------    -----------
<S>                                               <C>             <C>            <C>         
Net income (loss)                                 $  (495,908)    $ 1,895,968    $(1,360,790)
                                                  ===========     ===========    ===========

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding                           7,963,747       6,690,265      4,579,598

Common equivalent shares representing shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options               287,626         292,103        194,883

Convertible preferred stock                                --              --        553,858

Subtraction of common equivalent shares due to
antidilutive nature                                        --              --       (748,741)
                                                  -----------     -----------    -----------

Dilutive adjusted weighted average shares
and assumed conversions                             8,251,373       6,982,368      4,579,598
                                                  ===========     ===========    ===========


Basic net income (loss) per share                 $     (0.06)    $      0.28    $     (0.30)
                                                  ===========     ===========    ===========


Diluted net income (loss) per share               $     (0.06)    $      0.27    $     (0.30)
                                                  ===========     ===========    ===========
</TABLE>