alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000048595
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    57
<PP&E>                                           4,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                     187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              203
<BONDS>                                            645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              148
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,656
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   184
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       44
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    125
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
        

</TABLE>
No. 62949.

#### S. S. Stafford, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/14325 (New York).

*343Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 56853.

#### C. H. Arnold & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 962751-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grenadine the same in all material respects as that the subject of *La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 44, C. A. D. 461), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 536 

Expressing support for the designation of September 25, 2017, as ‘‘National 

Lobster Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 

Mr. POLIQUIN (for himself and Ms. PINGREE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 25, 

2017, as ‘‘National Lobster Day’’. 

Whereas the American lobster is recognized around the world 

as a prized and flavorful culinary delicacy; 

Whereas lobster fishing has served as an economic engine and 

family tradition in the United States for centuries; 

Whereas thousands of families in the United States make 

their livelihoods from lobster fishing and processing; 

Whereas, with approximately 150,000,000 pounds of lobster 

landed each year in the United States, at an annual value 

of more than $500,000,000, lobster represents one of the 

most valuable catches in the United States; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 536 IH 

Whereas foreign markets for lobster from the United States 

are booming, with export values having nearly tripled 

since 2005; 

Whereas historical lore notes that lobster likely joined turkey 

on the table at the very first Thanksgiving feast in 1621; 

Whereas responsible lobstering practices beginning in the 

1600s have created one of the most sustainable fisheries 

in the world; 

Whereas 2017 marks the 145th anniversary of lobster conservation efforts in the United States, starting with a 

Maine law banning the harvest of egg-bearing females; 

Whereas, throughout history, United States Presidents have 

served lobster at their inaugural celebrations and state 

dinners with international leaders; 

Whereas lobster is an excellent, versatile source of lean protein that is low in saturated fat and high in vitamin B12; 

Whereas the peak of the lobstering season in the United 

States occurs in the late summer; 

Whereas the preservation and long distance transportation of 

lobster meat was first achieved 175 years ago with the 

advent of a canning process; 

Whereas lobster has become a culinary icon, with the lobster 

roll featured at the 2015 World Food Expo in Milan, 

Italy; and 

Whereas lobster is enjoyed at casual beach-side lobster boils 

and also revered as a delicacy at fine dining restaurants: 

Now, therefore, be it 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 536 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages the people of the United States to observe National 

3 Lobster Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,715,490
<SECURITIES>                                27,000,698
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,445,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,179
<INVENTORY>                                  4,969,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,599,474
<PP&E>                                      21,504,063
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,064,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,107,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,094,551
<BONDS>                                      1,275,017
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       404,899
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,939,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,107,903
<SALES>                                     69,012,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,012,395
<CGS>                                       39,251,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,601,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               388,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             388,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,443,376
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,810,167)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,662,924
<DISCONTINUED>                             (5,766,956)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,895,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
psn-ex1041_1480.htm





 

 
Exhibit 10.41
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE

PARSONS CORPORATION RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
(2017 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT)

The Parsons Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (2017 Amendment and Restatement) (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows effective as of January 1, 2021, unless otherwise indicated below:


	
 
	
1.
	
A new Section 1.16 is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:




1.16Merger of OGSystems 401(k) Plan.  Effective as of January 1, 2021, the OGSystems 401(k) Plan (the “OGSystems Plan”) is merged into this Plan and the assets held pursuant to the trust for the OGSystems Plan are combined with the Trust Fund and held pursuant to the Trust Agreement.  Effective as of said date, every participant in the OGSystems Plan (each an “OGSystems Participant”) who was not previously a Participant in the Plan will become a Participant.  The accounts held under the OGSystems Plan will be transferred to the applicable accounts under the Plan and the rights and benefits of OGSystems Participants will be governed by the Plan, including without limitation, Section 4.2.5 hereof.  


	
 
	
2.
	
Effective as of January 1, 2021, OGSystems shall be added to the list of Participating Companies set forth on the Addendum to Section 2.30 of the Plan.





	

	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument of amendment is executed this ______ day of October 2020.




PARSONS CORPORATION

By: 

Name: 

Title:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brian Sereda, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Brian Sereda                                                 
|Brian Sereda                                                        
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|May 10, 2010
No. 67741.

#### Railway Express Agency, a/c M & K Iron & Metal Co. *v.*United States,

protest 62/3088 (Los Angeles).

*309Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vises similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59420, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63514.

protests 59/17286 and 59/18596 (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

*407Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C.D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Edward F. Brennan, Ph.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CryoCor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007



/s/    EDWARD F. BRENNAN,
PH.D.Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waste Industries USA, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jim W. PerryPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2004
Exhibit 10.7.1

Amendment to Employment Agreement

Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) and H.C. Kip Ferguson (Executive) entered into an Employment Agreement effective
October 1, 2009 (the Agreement). The Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement effective as of November 14, 2011, as follows:

FIRST:Section 1.1(e) of the Agreement is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety as follows:

(e) Change of Control means a Change in Control as defined under the Incentive Plan as in effect on November 14, 2011.

SECOND:Section 1.1(l) of the Agreement is hereby amended by restatement in its entirety as follows:

(l) Incentive Plan means the Companys Stock Incentive Plan as amended from time to time.

THIRD:To correct a scriveners error, Section 5.2(d) of the Agreement is hereby renumbered as Section 5.3 and all subsequent
sections and subsections are renumbered accordingly.



Executed on the 16thday of November, 2011.Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation/s/ Joe L. McClaughertyBy Joe L. McClaugherty, Chair,Compensation Committee of the Board of DirectorsExecutive/s/ H.C. Kip FergusonH.C. Kip Ferguson




- 1 -
No. 64704.

#### Schenley Distilleries, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 128126-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion -by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *320*United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 64723.

#### Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33788 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 59410.

protest 247138-K (New York).

#### Silver Hill Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant disturbing the-action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of
our report dated October 16, 1998, in this Current Report on Form 8-K and the
incorporation by reference of our report dated October 16, 1998 into Allied
Waste Industries, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3
(File No. 33-73618, File No. 333-30559 and File No. 333-57507), Form S-4 (File
No. 333-22575, File No. 333-31231, File No. 333-35639, File No. 333-52501 File
No. 333-60727 and File No. 333-62473) and Form S-8 (File No. 33-42354, File No.
33-63510, File No. 33-79654, File No. 33-79756, File No. 33-79664 File No.
333-48357 and File No. 333-62473-01).
 
                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Phoenix, Arizona,
October 23, 1998.
- Home
- Who We Are    - Organization
  - History
  - Policies & Planning
  - FGDC Secretariat
- What We Do  - ADVANCEMENT OF THE NSDI
- Geospatial Data Act
- Collaboration & Partnerships
- Develop Geospatial Shared Services    - Geospatial Platform
  - Cloud Computing
  - Geospatial Interoperability
- Manage Federal Geospatial Resources    - A-16 NGDA Portfolio Management
  - Geospatial Platform Marketplace
- Standards Development
- Geospatial Metadata
 
- Initiatives  - Current    - NSDI Strategic Plan 2021-2024
  - Geospatial Platform Shared Services
  - NGDA Management Plan
  - Open Water Data Initiative
  - National Address Database
  - GeoPathways
  - Disaster Risk Resilience
- Emerging Topics    - Geolocation Privacy
  - Crowdsourcing
  - Education & Workforce Development
  - New Geodetic Datums
- Past Activities    - Cooperative Agreements Program
  - Fifty States Initiative
  - Geospatial Line of Business
  - SmartBUY
 
- Organization    - Overview
  - Steering Committee
  - Executive Committee
  - National Geospatial Advisory Committee
  - Coordination Group
  - Working Groups
  - Subcommittees
  - FGDC Secretariat
  - Collaborating Partners
  - Membership Directory
- Resources    - Key Publications
  - Download Geospatial Standards
  - Policies & Planning
  - Lexicon of Geospatial Terminology
  - FGDC Geospatial Services Status Checker
  - News
  - Calendar
  - Media Resources

****

#                     FGDC Coordination Group Meeting, June 2017 - FED ONLY                

        -  Home 
        -  Organization 
        -  FGDC Coordination Group 
        -  Meeting Minutes 
        -  2017 
        -  June 
        -  FGDC Coordination Group Meeting, June 2017 - FED ONLY 

#### Meeting Materials

                - Agenda  (pdf)
                - Vegetation Subcommittee Report  (pdf)
                - Using The National Map Products and Services  (pdf)
                - Geospatial Platform PMO Activities Update  (pdf)

#### Contact Us

**Office:**
**Fax:**
**Email:**

##### **Subscribe** to Our Mailing List                            for Important News & Updates

**Subscribe

******Like                                    us**

******Follow                                    us**

******RSS**

Policies & NoticesUSA.gov Download Adobe Reader  Download Office Viewers
### SCPW-13-0000932

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

ANTHONY JOHNSON, Petitioner,

vs. MARIE LADERTA, WANDA CHONG-MENDONCA, and ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS,

Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ADLRO CASE NOS. 12-07002, 13-01883) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR PROHIBITION ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C

. J

. , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , M c K e n n a , a n d P o l l a c k , J J

. )



### Upon consideration of petitioner Anthony Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, filed on May 17, 2013, and the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, it appears that petitioner’s license was revoked at the time of his April 11, 2013 arrest (ADLRO No. 13-01883) and, therefore, he did not have a clear and indisputable right to an ignition interlock permit in ADLRO No. 13-01883. See HRS § 291E-44.5(b)(1) (Supp. 2012). In addition, petitioner has Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000932 24-JUN-2013 10:23 AM

### alternative means to obtain the requested relief. See Kema v.

Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus and/or a writ of prohibition is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); State ex rel. Marsland v. Ames, 71 Haw. 304, 306, 788 P.2d 1281, 1283 (1990) (“[T]he mere fact that other remedies are not available has never in itself been sufficient justification for [a writ].”); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai # i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 24, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack