alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-KA

 

 

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2012

 

Commission File Number 000-33271

 

 

GLOBAL BIOTECH CORP.

 

 

 

 

Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

2711 Centreville Rd Suite 400

Wilmington, Delaware 19808

 

Issuer's telephone number: (302) 288-0658

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: Commonstock, par value $0.0001 per share Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issueras defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act- [x] NO

 

Indicate by check markif the registrant is not required to filereports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act- [x] NO

 

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to filesuch reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days -Yes |X|

 

**Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submittedelectronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuantto Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period thatthe registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes [X] No**

** **

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers, pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K, is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, indefinitive proxy or information, statements incorporated by reference in Part 3 of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K- NO [x]

**Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large acceleratedfiler, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large acceleratedfiler,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. [] Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) [X] Smallerreporting company**

** ** 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as determinedin Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) - NO [x]

 

Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $0

** **

**As of August 26, 2013, the aggregate market value of the issuer'scommon stock based on its reported price on the OTC Bulletin Board held by non-affiliates of the issuer was approximately $114,903.**

** **

**At August 26, 2013, 82,073,890 shares of issuer's common stockwere outstanding**.

GLOBAL BIOTECH CORP.

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Hamilton certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Home Loan Financial
Corporation, ("HLFC");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of HLFC as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. HLFC's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for HLFC and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to HLFC, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of HLFC's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in HLFC's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during HLFC's most recent fiscal
      quarter (HLFC's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, HLFC's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. HLFC's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to HLFC's
auditors and the audit committee of HLFC's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect HLFC's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in HLFC's internal control
      over financial reporting.

/s/ Robert C. Hamilton
-----------------------------
Robert C. Hamilton, President

Date: February 14, 2005
<PAGE>

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Reliant Resources, Inc.'s
Registration Statement Nos. 333-60124, 333-60328, 333-74754, 333-74790,
333-86608, 333-86610, 333-86612, 333-98273, 333-101471, and 333-101473, on Form
S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2003 (which expresses an unqualified opinion
and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the restatement described in
Note 1 and the change in method of accounting for derivatives and hedging
activities in 2001, the change in method of accounting for goodwill and other
intangibles in 2002 and the method of presenting trading and marketing
activities from a gross basis to net basis in 2002, as described in Notes 7, 6
and 2, respectively) on the consolidated financial statements of Reliant
Resources, Inc. and our report dated March 31, 2003 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
change in method of accounting for derivatives and hedging activities in 2001,
as described in Note 8) on the financial statements of El Dorado Energy, LLC
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Reliant Resources, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
April 3, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group Corp.
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Wu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


February 12, 2008


                                        By: /s/ David Wu
                                        ----------------
                                        David Wu, CEO
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            W-H ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth T. White, Jr., the Chief Executive
Officer of W-H Energy Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/  Kenneth T. White, Jr.
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name: Kenneth T. White, Jr.
                                       Date: May 5, 2005

This certification is furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Rule
13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein and shall not be deemed
to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.
(Reap. Dec. 10297)

Entry No. J-1378.

#### J. Gerber & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 12, 1962)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Ghuilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, Attorney for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise subject to the present appeal for reappraisement consists of short radius ells and 90° long radius standard ells *(unfinished,*seamless welding fittings, *Masted)*manufactured in Italy and imported by Plaintiff herein.

> 2. That the short radius ells were erroneously appraised as 90° long radius ells at invoice price less 70 per cent, less 10 per cent, plus 10% per cent, less 0.35 per cent, less Ocean freight, packed.

> 3. That at the time of exportation, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for export to the United States in accordance with See. 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, at invoice price less 70 per cent, less 10 per cent, plus 7% per cent, *less 0.85 per cent, less Ocean freight, packed.*

> 4. That as to all other merchandise covered by the invoices pertaining to the present appeal for reappraisement Plaintiff hereby abandons its appeal, and that the present appeal for reappraisement is deemed submitted upon the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the short radius ells included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein is statutory export value and hold that such value for the said merchandise is the invoice price, less 70 per centum, less 10 per centum, plus 7% per centum, less 0.35 per centum, less ocean freight, packed.

As to all other merchandise included in the shipment under consideration, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 57171.

protest 190848-K (New York).

#### E. M. Grajew Wool Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 66214.

#### Lang & Marshall Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/6220 (New York).

*370Opinion by

Fobd, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meat holders similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63928, except that they are in chief value of other base metal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(770) 451-0313 FAX (770) 451-0317 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 

### ALAN ARMSTRONG ATTORNEY AT LAW 2900 CHAMBLEE-TUCKER ROAD BUILDING 5. SUITE 350 ·, ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30341 July 18, 2012

In re: In the Matter ofMonroe Air Center, LLC FAA Case No. 2011 SW030084 FFA CP Case No.
____; Judge Not Assigned ): I 

### l alan'@alanarmstronglaw.com www.alanarmstronglaw.com 

### Via FederalExpress

Dear Sir or Madam:

# r~ntS**d-O~~Drt75"** Enclosed please find an original and one copy ofthe following documents to be filed in the above referenced matter: 1. Answer ofMonroe Air Center, LLC; 2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Complaint; 3. Affidavit ofJudy Fuller; and 4. Affidavit ofPalmerJarrell.

Please file the original pleadings, date-stamp the extra copies ofthe pleading and return them to the undersigned in the enclosed postage prepaid, self-addressed envelope. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

AA/kjw Enclosures Cc: Tim Duff, Esq. Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Ft. Worth, TX 76137 Fax: 817-222-5945 Email: tim.duff@faa.gov Palmer Jarrell, Monroe Air Center Best regards,

# Ad~n~M~**~**

1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 691 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 691

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any 
  infrastructure legislation to promote broadband internet access or 
  communications facilities deployment should treat all broadband and 
   communications facilities in a competitively and technologically 
                            neutral manner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2018

Mr. Latta submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any 
  infrastructure legislation to promote broadband internet access or 
  communications facilities deployment should treat all broadband and 
   communications facilities in a competitively and technologically 
                            neutral manner.

Whereas broadband brings extraordinary opportunities for economic growth and 
        investment across multiple platforms and technologies, including 
        wireline, wireless, and cable;
Whereas broadband and related information technology add nearly $1 trillion 
        annually to the United States economy;
Whereas broadband and related communications and technology sectors support 
        roughly 10 million American jobs;
Whereas wireline, wireless, and cable broadband providers collectively invested 
        $76 billion in 2016, and roughly $1.6 trillion since 1996;
Whereas wireline, wireless, and cable broadband providers are consistently 
        ranked among the top companies investing annually in the United States;
Whereas broadband traffic over wireline, wireless, and cable technologies 
        continues to grow at an exponential rate; and
Whereas world-class communications networks will require a complementary mix of 
        wireline, wireless, cable, and any other technology capable of 
        transmitting voice, video, or data communications services using 
        Internet Protocol or any successor protocol-enabled service: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
any infrastructure legislation to promote broadband internet access or 
communications facilities deployment should treat all broadband and 
communications facilities in a competitively and technologically 
neutral manner.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

December 22, 1943

No. 49044.

#### Protest 103902-K of Carey & Skinner, Inc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial Government counsel admitted for the record that the merchandise involved is a public document. It was therefore held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1629 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),


I, Michael G. Wirtz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 16, 2009








/s/ Michael G. WirtzMichael G. Wirtz,
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# AGENCY:

Departmental Offices, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of a modified system of records; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Treasury published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 2, 2023, concerning system location addresses. The document contained incorrect addresses.                    

# DATES:

Comments should be received on or before December 4, 2023 to be assured of consideration.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ryan Law, email:                         *privacy@treasury.gov,*                         phone: (202) 622-5710.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of November 2, 2023, in FR Doc 2023-24222, on page 75377 (third column), correct the addresses at numbers (10) and (11) to read:                

### SYSTEM LOCATION

* * * * *

                        (10)                         *The Office of Inspector General (OIG):*                         875 15th Street NW, Washington, DC 20005.                    

                        (11)                         *Treasury Inspector General for Tax*                         Administration (TIGTA): 901 D Street SW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20024-2169.                    

* * * * *

Ryan Law,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and Records.

[FR Doc. 2023-24603 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P
No. 52852.

#### B. F. Montague Co. v. United States,

protest 539911-G (New York).

Opionion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim-of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the quarterly report of FFP Marketing Company, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the undersigned certifies that:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          2. The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Date:  August 14, 2002               /s/ John H. Harvison
                                     ------------------------------
                                     John H. Harvison
                                     Chairman and
                                     Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 14, 2002               /s/ Craig T. Scott
                                     -------------------------------
                                     Craig T. Scott
                                     Vice President - Finance and
                                     Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 3(i)
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to PBI's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 14, 2000 and amended on December 19, 2000.


                                       71

<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk Octo ber 2 , 2020

161928

In re CONSERVATORSHIP OF SHIRLEY

BITTNER.

_________________________________________

STACEY BI TTNER, Personal Representative

of the ESTATE OF SHIRLEY BITTNER, and

SUZANNE BITTNER KORBUS,

Other Parties,

and

STACEY BITTNER, Individually,

Appellant,

SC: 161928

v COA: 347750

Macomb PC: 2016

- 221230

- CA

KEVIN AD AMS, ESQ., and THE LAW OFFICES

OF KEVIN ADAMS, PLLC,

Appellees

.

__________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.