alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

January 13, 1950

No. 53905.

#### The R. T. French Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 135827-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United*States (23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
----

| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),      and, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 31, 2008 | /s/ Darin M. Myman                         |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Darin      M. Myman                        |   |
|                       | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



ROCKFORD SINGAPORE CORPORATION
RUSS MOORE
SINGAPORE OPERATIONS MANAGER
102 East Pasir Panjang Road
Citilink Warehouse complex #07-06
Singapore 118529

Tele 011-65-278-8996
Fax  011-65-278-3116


ROCKFORD (EUROPE) ELEKTRONIK VERTRIEBS GmbH
JEAN-MICHEL BECK
EUROPEAN OPERATIONS MANAGER
Im Finigen 5
28832 Achim
Germany

Tele 011-49-4202-9450-0
Fax  011-49-4202-9750-50


ROCKFORD JAPAN CORPORATION
HARRY OMAE
PRESIDENT
514-1 Hita, Kannami-Cho
Tagata-Gun
Shizuoka-Ken, 419-01
Japan

Tele 011-81-559-791260
Fax  011-81-559-791265


ROCKFORD FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION
JEANNINE GIRAUDY-MCINTYRE
SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR, CORPORATE SERVICES
Ernst & Young Building
Bay Street
P.O. Box 261
Bridgetown,
Barbados

Tele 1-246-427-5260
Fax  1-246-426-9551
<PAGE>   2
LIGHTNING AUDIO
SCOTT DELEY, PRESIDENT
LARRY VANSIKEL, SECRETARY
1835 East 6th Street
Tempe, Arizona  85281




                                       -2-
----

| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),      and, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 31, 2009 | /s/ Darin M. Myman                         |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Darin      M. Myman                        |   |
|                       | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alternet Systems, Inc.
  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.

|Dated: January 22, 2007 | By: | /s/
      Griffin Jones                     
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Griffin Jones                               
|                        |     | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, CEO
|                        |     | Secretary & Director                        

---
EXHIBIT 3(ii)
                                     BYLAWS

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to PBI's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 14, 2000 and amended on December 19, 2000.

                                       72

<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.01





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-171632, 333-164268, 333-156659, 333-148487, 333-137676) of Shutterfly, Inc. of our report dated February 7, 2011 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California


February 7, 2011
David,

Please see our answers in blue below and as always, let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.

The range of sulfur content in the coke utilized to make anodes

used

in the reduction cells over the last year of operation.

1.) Alcoa (Massena West) % S range over the last year = 2.38%

- 2.46%

2.) Reynolds Metals Co. (Massena East) % S range (over the course of the last 12 operating months which due to curtailment

was October 2008

- June 2011) = 1.97%

- 2.80%.

The highest su lfur content in the coke utilized to make anodes used in the reduction cells at any time during the last 10

years.

1.) Alcoa (Massena West) = 2.46%

2.) Reynolds Metals Co. (Massena East) = 2.80%

The lowest sulfur content anode coke that you believe you could consistently obtain in sufficient quantities to operate your facility at capacity, long term (e.g. over the next 10 years).

Given concerns about the future availability of low sulfur coke,
Alcoa believes that the lowest sulfur content anode cok e that will be available in sufficient quantities to operate Massena at capacity long term is 3% sulfur. This 3% sulfur coke will be a blend of low and high sulfur material.

Nathan Rufa Senior Environmental Engineer Alcoa Primary Metals Massena Operation s Park Avenue East / PO Box 150 Massena, NY 13662

Tel: 315

- 764

- 4285

Fax: 315

- 764

- 4460
nathan.rufa@alcoa.com
Document

  Exhibit 10.31

Amendment # 2 to
UPLAND SOFTWARE, INC.


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


    This Amendment #2 to the Executive Employment Agreement by and between Upland Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and John T. McDonald (“Executive”) dated March 28, 2017 and amended March 13, 2019 (“Original Agreement”), is entered into as of November 12, 2020.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend Paragraph 3(b) of the Original Agreement as of the Effective Date.
AMENDMENT


Paragraph 3(b) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


    “3(b) Target Bonus. During the Employment Term, Executive will be eligible to receive an annual bonus targeted at 200% of Executive’s Base Salary, less applicable withholdings, upon achievement of performance objectives to be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, 25% of which shall be based upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA targets and 75% of which shall be based upon the achievement of acquisitions targets (the “Target Bonus”).  Any Bonus will be earned only if the Company achieves the annual performance objectives during the designated time period and Executive is continuously employed by the Company on the date that such performance objectives are achieved.  The actual amount of the Bonus may be less than or greater than the Target Bonus based on the level at which the Company achieves the annual performance objectives during the designated time period.  The Company shall pay such Bonus at the same time as bonuses are normally paid to senior management, unless the Board approves an exception for payment of a particular bonus on a case by case basis, but in any event, any earned Bonus shall be paid no later than two months and 15 days after the end of the Company’s taxable year in which such Bonus was earned.”


Except as specified in this Amendment #2, all terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and otherwise remain unchanged.


    







  Exhibit 10.31

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment # 2 to the Agreement, in the case of the Company by their duly authorized officers, as of the day and year first above written.


                            “COMPANY”
                            Upland Software, Inc.




                            By:  /s/ Kin Gill            
                            Name: Kin Gill
                            Title:  SVP, General Counsel and Secretary
    Address:    401 Congress Ave., Ste. 1850
        Austin, TX 78701


    “EXECUTIVE”


    /s/ John T. McDonald        
    John T. McDonald
    Address:
### HE ,*TIJOHNEY GENEHAL 

### OIFTEXA~

February 10, 

### 1958

Hon. William A. Harrison Commissioner of Insurance InternationalLife Building Austin, Texas

Dear Sir: opinion

### NO.~~-363 Re: Whether a company subject to the provisions of Subchapter A of Chapter 

### 5 of the Insurance Code regulating rates for motor vehicle cr automobile insurancemay declare dividendsto one class of insuredB.upona differentpercentagebasis from another class of insure& under the provisions of Article 

### 5.08 and Article 

### 5.09of the InsuranceCode. You have asked our opinion as follows: "Articles 

### 5.08and 

### 5.09 prohibit discriminationor distinctionsbeing made in the payment of dividends to policyholders. Article 

### 5.08specifically Bays that 'no insurer shall discriminate in any distributions of profitsbetween insured of a class, and no classes for distribution shallb,e made or established except on the approval of the Board'. We respectfully request your opinion as to whether a company subject to the provisions of Articles 

### 5.08and 

### 5.09 may declare dividends to one class of insured6upon a differentpercentagebasis from another class of insureds,with the only significantdifference between the two classesbeing that one class has paid premiums based upon a time period of sixmonths and the other has paid premiumsbased upon a time,period of twelve months or longer?" (Emphasisadded.) The effect of the language that you have quoted from Article 

### 5.08of the Insurance Code as set out above is to vest the Insurance Department with authority to approve or disapprove the creation of any classes for distribution. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting Articles 

### 5.08and 

### 5.09of the Insurance Code to prevent cliscrimination in the payment of dividends to policyholders. In exercising the authority vested in it, th&Board has full authority to determinewhether or not the proposed classes for distributionare justifiable. Therefore, it is for the Board to determinewhether or not there is a significantHon. William A. Harrie&, page 2 (~~-363)

differencebetween the two classes as outlined in your letter SO as to warrant approving them 88 separate classes for the payment of dividends. SUMMARY

It iawithin the authority of the State Board of Insurance to determinewhether proposed. claeee.9

of insureda for.dividendpurposes are justifiableunder Article 5.08 of the Insurance Code. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

-* Fred B. Werkenthin Assistant FBW:l.m APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: Gee. P. Blackburn, Chairman John H. Minton, Jr. B. H. TiminS, Jr. Marietta McGregor Payne REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: W. V. Geppert
EXHIBIT 13.1f CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amended Shell Company Report of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the Event dated July 9, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gao Ren, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gao RenGao Ren, President and Chairman April 26, 2010
No. 64739.

#### Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 997966-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

September 30, 1954

No. 58408.

protest 166150-K (Philadelphia).

#### Holzer Company *v.*United States,

Ekwall, Judge:

This case involves the rate at which the currency of the invoice, Swiss francs, should be converted into United States dollars under section 522 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The collector, in liquidation, adopted the “free” rate which plaintiff claims is illegal. Plaintiff contends that the “official” rate of exchange should have been used. '

At the hearing, it was stipulated that, in view of the CIE circular in evidence, the merchandise would be returned at the official rate of exchange. Upon this stipulation, together with the exhibit, the case was submitted.

In view of the agreement of counsel, we sustain plaintiff’s claim and hold that the “official” rate of exchange should have been used in-liquidation. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53413.

protests 122248-K, etc. (Pittsburgh).

#### Joseph S. Finch & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct.—, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------


     In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of ebank Financial Services, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                            /s/  Wayne  W.  Byers
                                            -------------------------
                                            Wayne  W.  Byers
                                            Chief  Financial  Officer
                                            August  14,  2003


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-77;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
May 14, 1963

No. 67731.

Appeal 5104.

#### United States *v.*Esso Standard Oil Company.

C.D. 2314. Appeal dismissed May 10, 1963.
No. 63987.

protests 313764-K, etc. (Champlain).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 21        Subsidiaries


BASIS, Inc. is incorporated under the laws of the state of Arizona and does not
operate under a DBA.

Great River Systems, Inc. is incorporated under the laws of the state of
Wisconsin and does not operate under a DBA.
EXHIBIT 21
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

NAME                       STATE OF INCORPORATION
----                       ----------------------

Premier Bank               Pennsylvania

PBI Capital Trust          Delaware

Lenders Abstract, LLC      Pennsylvania


                                       78

<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 8, 2011 

y0405 

Order 

 

April 8, 2011 

142642-3 

_________________________________________ 

MICHELLE GIRARD, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142642 

 COA: 299291 

Oakland CC Family Division: 

DUANE MONTGOMERY, JR., 2010-769976-DO 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

DUANE MONTGOMERY, JR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142643 

 COA: 299531 

Oakland CC Family Division: 

MICHELLE GIRARD, 2010-770098-DC 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case No. 8,315.

#### - v. LEWIS.

[1 Brunner, Col. Cas. 27; 2 2 Hayw. (N. C.) 346.]

Circuit Court, D. North Carolina.

June Term, 1805.

Limitations — Running of Statute during War.

The statute of limitations was suspended during the continuance of the war as to alien enemies disoualified to sue in our courts.

PER CURIAM.

The act of 1715, whilst it was unrepealed, was suspended from its usual operation by the acts disqualifying British adherents to sue in our courts. It did not begin to operate as to such persons till the end of the war, and then if the seven years were not completed before it was repealed by the act of 1789 [1 Stat. 73], no bar could ever be operated under it. Lewis, the testator, *457died in 1780; between the end of the war and 17S9 were not seven years. The demurrer to the plea, stating these facts, and relying upon the act of 1715, must be allowed. Plea held good.
vir-ex1038_490.htm



Exhibit 10.38

 

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.

 


		
	
AMENDMENT INFORMATION

	
Agreement to be Amended:
	
Grant agreement between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Vir Biotechnology Inc, effective January 26, 2018, as amended, and bearing Investment ID INV-010344 (OPP1187970)

	
Amendment Purpose:
	
Change in Payment and Deliverable Table

	
Amendment Date:
	
Date of this email  




 

THIS AMENDMENT amends, and is made part of, the above-referenced Agreement and is effective as of the date of this email. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meaning provided in the Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment will prevail.

 

UPDATED REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

This Amendment notifies You that the reporting and/or payment schedule for Your grant has changed. Your updated Reporting & Payment Schedule is deleted and replaced with the following: 

 


	
REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
 
	
[***]
	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
 
	
 

	
Amended Total Grant Amount
	
Up to $20,776,349.00