alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
1999,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         850,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               916,175
<PP&E>                                         271,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,187,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,222
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,149,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,187,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (75,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (75,583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


THE FOLLOWING TABLE ILLUSTRATES THE COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             ------------------------------
                                                             MARCH 31, 1998  MARCH 31, 1997
                                                             --------------  --------------
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>
Numerator:
     Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per
          common share -- net earnings                           $ 1,749        $ 2,233
                                                                 =======        =======


Denominator:
    Denominator for basic earnings per common share --
         weighted average number of common shares
         outstanding during the period                            14,347         12,948

    Incremental common shares attributable to outstanding
          stock options                                               84           --
                                                                 -------        -------

    Denominator for diluted earnings per common share             14,431         12,948
                                                                 =======        =======


Basic earnings per common share                                  $  0.12        $  0.17
                                                                 =======        =======

Diluted earnings per common share                                $  0.12        $  0.17
                                                                 =======        =======
</TABLE>
No. 64750.

#### Waldburger & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 281787-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayou City Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles T. Bukowski, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company





/s/ Charles T. Bukowski


Charles T. Bukowski


Chief Executive Officer and President





August 16, 2010
H. Res. 74 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 2, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 36) providing for congressional disapproval under 

chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of 

the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation’’. All points of order against consideration of the 

joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 

joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any 

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 
2 

•HRES 74 EH 

37) disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of 

Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration relating to the 

Federal Acquisition Regulation. All points of order against 

consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 60712.

#### Fuldheim, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 188554-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57645, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 64756.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 183826-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jeffrey Staszak, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       **Volterra Semiconductor Corporation**     Date: November 9, 2005 By: /s/ Jeffrey Staszak         Jeffrey Staszak
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of Global Services Partners Acquisition Corp.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2007 (the
‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Avinash Vashistha, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
      President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Dated:
      October 29, 2007




By:  /s/
      Avinash Vashistha





Avinash
      Vashistha


Chief
      Financial Officer and Executive Vice President


(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)
Federal Housing Finance Agency 

Joshua Stallings – Deputy Director 

Division of Bank Regulation (DBR) 

Stallings joined FHFA in 2011 and most recently 

served as Examiner-in-Charge of the Office of Fannie 

Mae Examinations within the Division of Enterprise 

Regulation (DER). Previously, he served as the 

Examiner-in-Charge of the Office of Freddie Mac 

Examinations and the Boston and Cincinnati 

FHLBanks. 

While serving in different capacities at the FHFA, Stallings also received the 

Housing Finance Examiner Commission, became an Excellence in 

Government Fellow, and completed the Stonier Graduate School of Banking. 

He began his supervisory career with the Office of Thrift Supervision, where 

he received his Federal Thrift Regulator commission. Stallings received a 

Bachelor of Business Administration with a focus in Economics from the 

University of Georgia. 

8/15/2022
Document

Exhibit 10.8
Fees to be Paid to the Non-Employee Directors
of
Sealed Air Corporation (the “Corporation”)
2021
Members of the Board of Directors who are not officers or employees of the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation (“non-employee directors”) shall be paid the following directors’ fees in cash, payable quarterly in arrears on or about the first day of the succeeding calendar quarter, which fees shall be in addition to retainers payable to non-employee directors under the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan:
(i)for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Audit Committee, a fee of Six Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($6,250) per calendar quarter for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Audit Committee, a fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) per calendar quarter for serving as a member;
(ii)for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a fee of Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($3,750) per calendar quarter for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a fee of One Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Five Dollars ($1,875) per calendar quarter for serving as a member;
(iii)for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Organization and Compensation Committee, a fee of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) per calendar quarter for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Organization and Compensation Committee, a fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) per calendar quarter for serving as a member;
(iv)a fee of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) per day for special assignments undertaken by a non-employee director at the request of the Board or any committee of the Board or for attending a director education program; and
(v)meeting fees as approved by the Board of Directors for non-employee directors who serve on any special committee or for attendance at special meetings of the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors in the event of a major transaction, etc.


The amount of the Annual Retainer (as defined in the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan) to be paid to the non-employee directors of the Corporation who are elected at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is $140,000 payable in shares of Common Stock plus $100,000 payable in cash unless the non-employee director elects payment of the cash portion in shares of Common Stock.
The amount of the Annual Retainer to be paid to the independent Chairman of the Board is $224,000 payable in shares of Common Stock plus $160,000 payable in cash unless the Chairman elects payment of the cash portion in shares of Common Stock.
Under the Sealed Air Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, a non-employee director may elect to defer all or part of his or her Annual Retainer until the director retires from the Board. None of the other fees mentioned above are eligible to be deferred.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                               SHOPKO STORES, INC.


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ShopKo Stores,
Inc. (the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 30, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: September 8, 2005
                                        SHOPKO STORES, INC.


                                                /s/ Paul G. White
                                        ----------------------------------
                                                Paul G. White
                                                Senior Vice President,
                                                Chief Merchandising Officer,
                                                Co-Chief Executive Officer*



         This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


* The office of Chief Executive Officer is comprised of three executive
officers, each serving as Co-Chief Executive Officer.

                                       34
No. 67709.

#### Milo Mills *v.*United States,

protest 61/3918(A) (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, consisting of certain 15-denier nylon monofilament yarn having a slight turn twist, is properly classifiable as filaments of rayon or other synthetic textile, singles, weighing less than 150 deniers per length of 450 meters, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 50295.

#### Protests 98965-K, etc., of Baker, Carver & Morrell Ship Supplies, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Before the Second Division,

February 7, 1947

No. 51553.

#### Protests 585807-G, etc., of Julius Kayser & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was sustained.
No. 59415.

protest 258100-K (New York).

#### S. Stern, Henry & Co. *v.*United States,

*292Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 54526.

#### Keljikian & Hatounian & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 156082-K (B), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the ■court dismissed the protests.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00537

- CV

Ninfa Castaneda and Eloy Castaneda v. Wilma Garza Chapa, Independent Executor of the Estate of Ninfa Rivas McKinzie, and as Trustee of the Samuel Garza Trust

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018PR

- 00266

- 2A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 16 , 2024
```
Exhibit 23.2 Auditors Consent

CHAIFETZ & SCHREIBER, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

                                                         21 Harbor Park Drive N
                                                      Port Washington, NY 11250
                                                        Telephone (516)484-8700
                                                        Facsimile (516)484-8770
                                                    www.chaifetzandschreiber.com

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors
Xfone, Inc.
960 High Road
London, N12 9RY
UK

Gentlemen:

We consent to the inclusion of our Independent Auditors' Report dated March 25,
2003, with respect to the financial statements of Xfone, Inc. and subsidiary
for the year ended December 31, 2002, in the upcoming filing of its Form 10-KSB,
for Xfone, Inc.

Yours truly,

/s/ Chaifetz & Schreiber, P.C.

CHAIFETZ & SCHREIBER, P.C.

Port Washington, New York
March 27, 2003
```