alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10642)

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. F-5636, etc.

(Decided December 17, 1963)

*Barnes, Richardson & OoVburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, were submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> *497IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the items on the invoices covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in Schedule “A”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, which are marked “A” and initialed AYD, NWS, JJC, WEG, by Examiner Aume V. Demers, Norman W. Soni, John J. Ozechowiez, W. E. Goff consist of vat-lined pulpboard similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *A. N. Dermger, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9927, and therein held to be dutiable on the basis of export value under Sec. 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956; that the record in said Reap. Dec. 9927 may be incorporated herein; that at the time of exportation said export value was the invoice price; and that the instant appeals may be submitted upon this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts and following the cited authority, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise, covered by said appeals for reappraisement, which is marked “A,” and initialed AVD, NWS, JJC, or WEG, by Examiner Aume V. Demers, Norman W. Soni, John J. Czechowicz, or W. E. Goff, on the invoices to which said appeals relate, and that such values were the invoice prices.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit
      23.01





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms
      S-3 Nos. 333-111276 and 333-127222), of Convera Corporation and in the related
      Prospectuses of our reports dated March 21, 2006, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements of Convera Corporation, Convera Corporation
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      of
      Convera Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
      ended January 31, 2006.





/s/
      ERNST
& YOUNG LLP








McLean,
      Virginia


March
      26,
      2006
No. 66197.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/23994 (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh horsemeat, deeharacterized, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group Corp.
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Wu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


February 12, 2008


                                                 By: /s/ David Wu
                                                     David Wu, CEO
EXHIBIT 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Global Imaging Systems, Inc. (the
Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|February 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas S. Johnson                            
|Date             |  |  |  | Thomas S. Johnson,                               
|                 |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
|                 |  | 
|February 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Raymond Schilling                            
|Date             |  |  |  | Raymond Schilling,                               
|                 |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (Exchange Act) or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.



A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global Imaging Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Global Imaging Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 62959.

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

protests 58/11251, 58/11246, and 58/11247 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution, and for failure to pay the increased duties due.
No. 57161.

protests 834887-G, etc. (New York).

#### Silberstein-Neulander Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Nutraceutical International Corporation (the “Company”) for the period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank W. Gay II, Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ FRANK  W. GAY II          |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Frank W. Gay II               |
| *Chairman of the Board*       |
| *and Chief Executive Officer* |
| Date: July 27, 2006      |

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Nutraceutical International Corporation (the “Company”) for the period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Leslie M. Brown, Jr., Senior VicePresident, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ LESLIE  M. BROWN, JR.                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Leslie M. Brown, Jr.                         |
| *Senior Vice President, Finance,*                 |
| *Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary* |
| Date: July 27, 2006                          |

 

Signed originals of these written statements requiredby Section 906 have been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
Before the Third Division,

August 2, 1946

No. 51261.

#### Protests 117839-K, etc., of Hallet and Carey Co. (Duluth).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
Exhibit 4.1





APPLIED OPI'OELECTRONICS, INC.CUSIP 03823U 10 2THIS CERTIFIES
THATis the owner ofFULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF -------=========== APPLIED OPTOELECTRONICS,
INC. =============-----­ lransferabfr on lhe books of lite Corporation by the Jwl.der he reof in person or by Atlomey 1tpon
surrender of lhis certi{ica.te properly endo rned. This certi ficate is not. ual,id. un til. countersigned and ngi .ef.ered by
the Transfer Agent and Regi,sfra r. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certi ficate to be signed by facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized offreers .






     


     


    

 


HisCerti-fic:nte and the :!!h aies repr-rrted hereby are is..".l.led
and ml have the rid r t-3. specified i n and be heki subject to all oi the pro vis ions of t he Mieles of lnco rpor,, tion ,,nd
the Byl oi !-'.1i d Ccrporntion and arty amendments and restatements thereof , to 311 ot which the holder of this C ertificate,
by acceptlncehe:reol, assents ill1d ag-ees to be boood. A -sta t ement at the rig-Its, prefefl:flces, privieg and r bict ions
gra nted to or imposed 4)0 n the respective doss or serE'S of 1he Ccrpo at ions' cap itl l stcck and up:m 1he holders1hered as
es tab, g 1ed by s..,id Artides of lncaporatim and Bylaws and a stammerrt of the number oi shares constit utilg each class or
seres oi stock and lhe designa tion thereof, may be obtal"led by MY shllreho lder , upon req uest nnd without chn,ge, at the principal
office of t he C« pom tion.Tog folowi1g a::l .,oons. whmuso:::I n 1m i nscrip1ia1 a1 1m ram of tM oortifical:e, sl\..,11
be construed as lhotq,1hE'y wwe Mitlm Olli in full aca,rcir,g to lppiClt:tlP l:!ws er , t lonsTEN aJl,,I - ,is lm.!!nts i'I CDmrTD'I
TEN ENT - .IS !E'nan ts by M lretiPs JT TB-I - as joi'll len.Tlts lr'li"ih r;.;;tit of .survNor.;h4J ,n::I not .is laMnts n coovnonUTMA
- Cuslocli!m (CustJ (Mira) tmwUniform Tr.insle-rs t o r,,-inor;;AdditiDIKII al::ttr.!-vi,-tions m., y also be uso:::I lho t.gh
not n abave is l!:l'o1•- uakt e, r eceioed Pl.£A..q_ I t-SERT SOCIAl.. SECUFITY OR OTI-ER D TIFYt. G NU W.BE.R OF ASSGI\EEko
 ·eb._y,re/4 a,r,,&1z, a1d tm 1 •ttllL:o-(PLEASE: PRINTOR lY PB'JFITE: NAME D AOORESS NC WD I NG ZIP CO D E O:-
AS9GNE:E:)Jlz1•e,s ff tk =/ital ,rt:oc/4 1•ef 1•e,se12ted &, tk wd-/2uv c'ogif'aue;a12dd:J ke/•eb._y t/v<elJocab/y,
co m tdu w a /zd af f o t /lb. _At1.orrze5 to - tra fa /" th e,.satd.rtod O/V llt& boo/u ,r/'t:/u;,tutift;/ 1,,-nan zed eo
o1•atio1v tuitif'ullf otue/0 !?f'oaht:icat:io;v t/V tke,fl'emise,r,0at:ed_ X X - - - TO.. nE.. AS-....1..-u< lHE CFlHE
IN EWRl" "MJHOUl" IOffWD,!CfiENARlBIE'iJ"Cf! IN/ o-w«lE -SIGNATURE GU ARANTE ED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2011 

p0321 

Order 

 

March 29, 2011 

142181 & (79) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142181 

 COA: 288102 

Wayne CC: 08-001845-FC 

WILLIAM EDWARD ARMOUR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 7, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand for a new trial is DENIED. 

ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Robert C. Hamilton, the President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Robert C. Hamilton
-----------------------------
Robert C. Hamilton, President

Date: February 14, 2005
**Exhibit 23.1**

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement of American Apparel, Inc. on Form S-8 File No. 0001-32697 of our report dated March 16, 2009, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial statement scheduleof American Apparel, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 and our report dated March 16, 2009 with respect to our audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of American Apparel, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Apparel, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

Our report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting expressed an adverse opinion because of the existence of material weaknesses. 

/s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP 

Macrum & Kliegman LLP

New York, New York 

March 16, 2009
(Reap. Dec. 10641)

#### The Durable Floor and Tile Co. Judson Sheldon International Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6351-H.

(Decided December 17, 1963)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, Counsel for the United States:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the present appeals for reappraisement consists of hardboard manufactured in Erance and exported to the United States by the Societe Francaise pour le Commerce Exterieur de Panneaux (Expano) and is described on the invoices as Isogil hardboard D-3 or D-6 and Isorel hardboard D-3;

> 2. That at the times of exportation of such merchandise, its export value within the meaning of Section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, was less than its foreign value within the meaning of Section 402a (c) of that Act;

> 3. That foreign value as defined in Section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for *496determining the value for appraisement of this merchandise, and that such value is:

> A. In the case of Isogil D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 31%, less 1%, less 1% *%,*less 20%, plus *packing;*

> B. In the case of Isogil D-6, 5.06 nouveau francs per square meter, less 22%,,less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;

> C. In the case of Isorel D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 33%%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing differential.

> 4. That as to all other merchandise covered by the invoices pertaining to these appeals for appraisement, Plaintiff hereby abandons its appeal; and that these appeals for reappraisement are deemed submitted upon the foregoing stipulations.

Upon, the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended bj the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the Isogil hardboard D-3 or D-6 and/or Isorel hardboard D-3, covered by this appeal for reappraisement, and that such values were as follows:

> In the case of Isogil D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 31%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;

> In the ease of Isogil D-6, 5.06 nouveau francs per square meter, less 22%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;

> In the case of Isorel D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 33%%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing differential.

Plaintiffs’ appeal having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, the same is hereby dismissed as respects thereto.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         101,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  914,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,860
<INVENTORY>                                     31,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,850,202
<PP&E>                                       4,306,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 645,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,563,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,221,731
<BONDS>                                      9,242,328
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    985,000
<COMMON>                                         1,886
<OTHER-SE>                                     614,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,563,199
<SALES>                                      1,957,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,957,031
<CGS>                                        1,122,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,122,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               916,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,417
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             232,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (298,696)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (46,434)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (252,262)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,223)
<CHANGES>                                     (64,255)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (319,740)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.77)


</TABLE>
No. 58854.

protest 240117-K (New York).

#### Marine Tobacco Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 56289.

protest 173426-K (New York).

#### Schall & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is' the same in all material respects as the paper boxes the subject of *B. Shackman & Co.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 1309), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P68/153.

protest 65/15761-15087 (Chicago).

#### Oxford International Corp. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of connecting links of not more than 2-inch pitch, containing more than three parts per pitch, valued at 40 cents or more per pound, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Oxford International Corp.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 125, C.D. 2740), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 57569.

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 154261-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of animal or human figures composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.