alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.25






, 2017




Dear                ,


You are receiving this letter due to the fact that you are party to a current employment agreement with Envestnet, Inc. and Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. (“EAM”) (your “Employment Agreement”).  Effective as of January 1, 2018, Envestnet, Inc. will be transferring the employment of all employees, as well as all benefit plans, payroll, and related contracts, from EAM to another wholly owned subsidiary of Envestnet, Inc., Envestnet Financial Technologies, Inc. (“EFT”).  


The transition will have no effect on the terms or conditions of your employment, including but not limited to your role, duties, compensation or benefits.  By signing this letter below, you acknowledge that the transfer of your employment from EAM to EFT shall in no way constitute a termination, interruption or discontinuance of your employment.  You agree that your Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect and is hereby amended to replace “Envestnet Financial Technologies, Inc.” for “Envestnet Asset Management, Inc.” in all places where “Envestnet Asset Management, Inc.” appears.


If you have any questions, feel free to contact the Human Resources Department at [  ]. 


Please return a signed copy of this agreement to [  ] at [  ] no later than December 11, 2017.




Sincerely, 


ENVESTNET, INC., ENVESTNET ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., AND ENVESTNET FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.






									
	By:		
			  Sharon Rosenthal – Chief Human Resources Officer







ACCEPTED:




									
			
	[Employee]		Date
No. 59940.

#### Cohen & Mann *v.*United States,

protests 231362-K and 227558-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cotton velveteen twill-back cloth, having a length of staple of the cotton contained therein of under *1%*inches, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

July 6, 1950

No. 54529.

#### The Hipage Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6719-R (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The petition was dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 236 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 236

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                Correcting the Enrollment of H.R. 1180.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 236

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1180), to amend the Social 
Security Act to expand the availability of health care coverage for 
working individuals with disabilities, to establish a Ticket to Work 
and Self-Sufficiency Program in the Social Security Administration to 
provide such individuals with meaningful opportunities to work, and for 
other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representative shall make the 
following correction: Strike section 408 and insert the following:

``SEC. 408. CLIMATE DATABASE MODERNIZATION.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration shall initiate a new competitive 
contract procurement for its multi-year program for key entry of 
valuable climate records, archive services, and database development in 
accordance with existing Federal procurement laws and regulations.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Jimmy Whang, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            STRATS(SM) Trust For JPMorgan Chase Capital XVII Securities,
            Series 2005-2 (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K containing
            distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
            included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
            required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
            trust agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
            these reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Depositor and the Trustee under the trust agreement and based upon
            my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
            agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Depositor
            and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that
            agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
            compliance by the Trustee and the Depositor with the minimum
            servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by
            an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
            compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
            Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the trust
            agreement that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 30, 2007

/s/ Jimmy Whang
----------------------
Name:   Jimmy Whang
Title:  Director
# University of

# Pittsburgh Bradford President

The Honorable Anthony Foxx SecretaryofTransportation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Foxx: July21,2014 300 Campus Drive Bradford, Pennsylvania !670l-2B9K Phone (Si-t) 36.2-7501**F~x** (814) 362-7640 lalexand@pitt.edu V./WW.Upb.pitt.CdU

!',j**··~·**,! (:::)

....**~,** ,,.,..!,,._,! The University ofPittsburgh at Bradford, in response to DOT Order 2014-6-6 terminating EAS eligibility for Bradford Regional Airport, strongly supports the granting of a waiver request for the airport. Pitt-Bradford considers commercial air service to be a critical factor for the economy of our region. Convenient and economical commercial flights are particularly important to the university community. Faculty and stafffrequently travel between Bradford and the University ofPittsburgh main campus in Pittsburgh. It is also important to the university that Pitt-Bradford students and prospective students havethe option offlying to and from Bradford. Since Bradford's EAS service shifted from Pittsburgh to Washington and then to Cleveland in 2008, Bradford has not been a viable transportation option for the Pitt-Bradford university community. The loss of a Pittsburgh airport connection has contributed to the steady decline in enplanements in Bradford. We are also aware from. our close relationship with the regional business community that Cleveland has been a much less convenient connection than Pittsburgh. We are confident that frequent and economical flights between Bradford and Pittsburgh, as proposed by Sun Air, will lead to a dramatic increase in enplanements above the required daily requirement ofI0 enplanements perday. Faculty, staffand students \vill resume using Bradford Regional Airport when service to Pittsburgh is restored. The granting ofa waiver for Bradford is critical to the University ofPittsburgh at Bradford. Our location in a beautiful but remote part of Pennsylvania places us at a competitive disadvantage m attracting and retaining students, faculty and staffifwe don'thave commercial air service.

Dr. Livingston Alexander President Sincerely,

Craig A. Hartburg Chair, Advisory Board
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercer Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Group”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David B. Merclean, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Group, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Group.











Date: August 9, 2010
/s/ David B. MercleanDavid B. MercleanSenior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
No. 64740.

#### Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 33124-K/89345, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *iiustin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 126

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking
2

HJ 126 RDS

1 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘Decem2 ber 7, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 5,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
No. 63530.

protests 183852-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Caledonia Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

April 9, 1959

No. 62960.

#### Curt L. Sterner Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/909 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 56302.

protest 176500-K (New York).

#### Vintage Wines, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Lancers Rose Wine in bottles or jugs similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 53224, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 74510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23977]



[[Page 74510]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-IMR-PECO-34549; PS.SIMLA0051.00.1]


Minor Boundary Revision at Pecos National Historical Park

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notification of boundary revision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The boundary of Pecos National Historical Park is modified to 
include nine tracts of unimproved land totaling approximately 192.37 
acres located in San Miguel County, New Mexico, immediately adjoining 
the boundaries of Pecos National Historical Park (Park).

DATES: The effective date of this boundary revision is October 31, 
2023.

ADDRESSES: The boundary revision is depicted on Map No. 430/179,642 
dated April 2023. The map is available for inspection at the following 
locations: National Park Service, Land Resources Program Center, 12795 
West Alameda Parkway, Suite 161, Lakewood, Colorado 80228; and National 
Park Service, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, 
DC 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Realty Officer, William Morgan, 
National Park Service, Interior Regions 6, 7 & 8, Land Resources 
Program Center, 12795 West Alameda Parkway, Suite 161, Lakewood, 
Colorado, telephone (303) 969-2610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 202(b) of the Act of June 27, 1990, 
16 U.S.C. 410rr-1, (Pub. L. 101-313), authorizes the Secretary of the 
Interior to make minor revisions to the boundary of Pecos National 
Historical Park, in accordance with section 7(c) of the Land and Water 
Conservation Fund Act of 1965, codified as amended at 54 U.S.C. 
100506(c). After notifying the House Committee on Natural Resources and 
the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Secretary of 
the Interior may make minor revisions to the boundaries of an area of 
the National Park System upon publication of Notice in the Federal 
Register. The Committees have been notified of this boundary revision. 
This boundary revision will support the Park's mission through the 
preservation and protection of significant resources, enhancing the 
interpretation and management of the Park in addition to providing 
expanded recreational opportunities to park visitors.

Katharine Hammond,
Regional Director, NPS Regions 6, 7, & 8.
[FR Doc. 2023-23977 Filed 10-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, ASAMENDED, AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. SECTION1350), M. DALE SKEEN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER OF VITRIA TECHNOLOGY,INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION (THE “COMPANY”) HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE,AS FOLLOWS:     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PERIODIC REPORT”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 10th day of May, 2006.     /s/ M. Dale Skeen, Ph.D.     M. Dale Skeen, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Vitria Technology, Inc. and will be retained byVitria Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Vitria Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 54511.

#### Jordan Marsh Company *v.*United States,

protest 974236-G (Boston).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Summary of Changes to Rule 2.0, Open Burning

Note: Minor changes such as spelling and numbering were not included below. 

Substantial proposed changes are shown in underline to indicate additions 

and strikethrough to indicate deletions compared to the originally proposed draft rule 

submitted on May 1, 2008.

Rule 2.0 OPEN BURNING

* * * * *

E. DEFINITIONS:

E.1 Agricultural Burning means:

(a) open outdoor of fires used in agricultural 

operations in the growing of crops or raising of fowl or 

animals, including burning empty paper containers of 

agricultural chemicals

E.12 Paper Containers of Agricultural Chemicals means sacks 

or other receptacles that are made predominately of 

paper and manufactured to contain pesticides, 

fertilizer, or toxic substances, and emptied and used in 

the field for purposes intimately associated with the 

growing and harvesting of crops.

H. OPEN BURNING PERMITS

H.2 Exemptions to Permit Requirements. The following are 

exempt from a District permit until proper public notice to

remove the exemption is filed. Other permitting 

requirements from the fire protection services may be 

required. 

(a) The open burning of paper agricultural pesticide 

sacks, provided the burning is conducted at the site 

of application, in accordance with proper disposal 

guidelines specified on the packaging and downwind 

from any person or susceptible crops.

J. AGRICULTURAL BURNING

J.4 Paper Containers of Agricultural Chemicals: The open 

burning of paper containers of agricultural chemicals must

be conducted in accordance with California Environmental

Protection Agency’s Department of Pesticide Regulation’s 

Guidelines for Emptying and Burning of Pesticide Bags,

including burning at the site of application, in accordance 

with proper disposal guidelines specified on the packaging 

and downwind from any person or susceptible crops.

* * * * *
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT Second Amendment CUMBERLAND OFFICE PARK, LLC Landlord EBANK.COM, INC. Tenant
  WHEREAS First Amendment Lease Section 1.1A nd Building
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Defined Terms
 2. Extension of the Term
 (a) First Extension Term First Extension Term Commencement Date First
Extension Term
 (b) Additional Extension of the Term provided however Second Extension Term Extension
 1




---



##### 



Notice Deadline
 (i) Fair Market Base Rent thirty (30) days
 (ii)
  3. Rent; Base Year
 (a) Base Rent
 2




---



##### 



(b) Base Rent Abatement
 (c) Base Year Base Year Operating Costs
 4. Condition of Premises; Disclaimer LANDLORD DOES NOT MAKE AND
HEREBY DISCLAIMS, AND TENANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT LANDLORD HAS NOT MADE AND HAS DISCLAIMED, ANY
REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE EXPANSION PREMISES,
INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE PRESENT OR FUTURE MERCHANTABILITY, CONDITION, QUALITY,
DURABILITY, FITNESS OR SUITABILITY THEREOF OR ANY PART THEREOF IN ANY RESPECT OR IN CONNECTION WITH
OR FOR THE PURPOSES AND USES OF TENANT
  5. Additional Modifications to the Lease; Miscellaneous Provisions
 (a) Landlords Liability Section 25.5
 (b) Substitution Space Article 26
 (c) Landlords Address for Notice
 
 Landlords Address for Payment
  3




---



##### 



6. Brokers
 7. Miscellaneous .
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 LANDLORD:CUMBERLAND OFFICE PARK, LLC, a Georgia limited
liability company
By:     P & L C.O.P., LLC, its ManagerDate executed: 4-13-04
    By:
    /s/ Adams D. Little III
    (SEAL)Name:
    Adams D. Little IIITitle:
    ManagerTENANT:EBANK.COM, INC., a Georgia corporationDate executed: 4/8/04
    By:
    /s/ David S. HaleyName:
    David S. HaleyTitle:
    SVP/CTO/CISO[CORPORATE SEAL] 5
No. 59914.

#### Hoffer & Slone and H. W. Robinson & co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 194888-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with *432the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEBASTIAN HURTADO HERNANDEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-72346 

Agency No. A213-080-879 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. 

Sebastian Hurtado Hernandez, a native of Guatemala and citizen of Mexico, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-72346 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th 

Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review. 

In his opening brief, Hurtado Hernandez does not challenge the agency’s 

dispositive determination that his asylum application was untimely and he failed to 

establish an exception to the one-year deadline. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 

F.3d 1072, 1079-1080 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in 

a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, Hurtado Hernandez’s asylum claim 

fails. 

Hurtado Hernandez also does not raise any argument challenging, and 

therefore waives, the agency’s dispositive determinations that his proposed social 

group of returnees with perceived wealth is not cognizable and that he otherwise 

failed to establish nexus to a protected ground. See id. Thus, Hurtado Hernandez’s 

withholding of removal claim also fails. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Hurtado Hernandez failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured 

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. 

See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). 
3 20-72346 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.