alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dr. Sean Williams, Chief Executive Officer of Webtradex International, Corp., (the "Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: February 16, 2011


By:
/s/ Dr. Sean WilliamsDr. Sean WilliamsChief Executive Officer
 This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

Goal Financial, LLC (the the Administrator) hereby
certifies as of December 31, 2007 as follows:



| | 1. | The undersigned has reviewed, for the period beginning January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2007: (a) the activities of the Administrator as they related to the
Administration Agreement dated as of June 07, 2007 (the Administration Agreement) between the Administrator, Goal Capital Funding Trust 2007-1 (the Issuer),Wilmington Trust Company (the Delaware Trustee), The Bank
of New York (the Indenture Trustee) and The Bank of New York (the Eligible Lender Trustee) and (b) the Administrators performance under the Administration Agreement. The performance by the Administrator of its
obligations under the Agreements has been made by persons under the direct supervision of the undersigned.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on my review of the Administrators performance under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Administration Agreement in all material respects for the period beginning January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2007.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This report is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.



GOAL FINANCIAL, LLCBy:

/s/ Seamus GarlandName:

Seamus GarlandTitle:

Secretary
Before the Second Division,

August 19, 1946

No. 51269.

#### Protests 937098-K, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom the uncontradicted evidence it was held that the brass-base shells similar in all material respects to those the subject of *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) and the Christmas tree lamps the same as those involved in *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(16 Cust. Ct. 148, C. D. 1003) are dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs. Marcel irons similar to those the subject of Abstract 38680 were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Frank W. Gay II, certify that:



|Date: January 31, 2008 |  | /s/FRANK W. GAY IIFrank W. Gay II
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Cory J. McQueen, certify that:



|Date: January 31, 2008 |  | /s/CORY J. MCQUEENCory J. McQueen
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Xiali
Gan, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008of Dragon
International Group Corp. ("small business issuer");





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)and
have:





a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a. All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





May 13,
2008




By: /s/ Xiali Gan


Xiali
Gan, CFO, principal financial officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brian Sereda, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Brian Sereda                                                    
|Brian Sereda                                                        
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|February 9, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1100 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1100

    To correct an oversight in earlier legislation by directing the 
National Park Service to grant to three individuals a right of use and 
          occupancy of certain property on Santa Cruz Island.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

  Mr. Pombo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To correct an oversight in earlier legislation by directing the 
National Park Service to grant to three individuals a right of use and 
          occupancy of certain property on Santa Cruz Island.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SANTA CRUZ ISLAND; ADDITIONAL RIGHTS OF USE AND OCCUPANCY.

    Section 202(e) of Public Law 96-199 (16 U.S.C. 410ff-1(e)) is 
amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
    ``(5) In the case of the real property referred to in paragraph 
(1), in addition to the rights of use and occupancy reserved under 
paragraph (1) and set forth in Instrument 90-027494, upon the enactment 
of this paragraph, the Secretary shall grant identical rights of use 
and occupancy to Mr. Francis Gherini of Ventura, California, the 
previous owner of the real property, and to each of the two grantors 
identified in Instrument No. 92-102117 recorded in the Official Records 
of the County of Santa Barbara, California. The use and occupancy 
rights granted to Mr. Francis Gherini shall be for a term of 25 years 
from the date of the enactment of this paragraph. The Secretary shall 
grant such rights without consideration and shall execute and record 
such instruments as necessary to vest such rights in such individuals 
as promptly as practicable, but no later than 90 days, after the 
enactment of this paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 50840.

#### Protest 119435-K of Semca Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

An examination of the record failing to find anything sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 57507.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 156174-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hair-on leather the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Carey & Skinner, Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1436), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

January 28, 1948

No. 52145.

protest 111000-K (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Cline, Judge:

This is a rehearing on a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise invoiced as “mixed feed oats” at the rate of 5 percent *257ad valorem under paragraph 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Canada, T. D. 49752. It is claimed that the merchandise is entitled to free entry under Public Law 211 (57 Stat. 607).

When this case was originally before us, we held that the merchandise was similar to that involved in *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States,*14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919; that such merchandise was included within the terms of Public Law 211; that it was entitled to free entry, provided the regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury had been complied with; that both the preliminary affidavit and the affidavit of use had been filed in connection with entry No. CE 0106; that an affidavit of use had been filed in connection with entry No. CE 0107, but that there was no evidence that an affidavit of intended use had been so filed. The protest was sustained as to entry N.o. CE 0106 and overruled as to entry No. CE 0107. *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*18 Cust. Ct. 209, Abstract 51761.

Thereafter, a motion for a rehearing was made and granted, and the case was resubmitted on the following stipulation:

It is stipulated that an affidavit of intended use which is a part of the customs, file in entry CE 0107, covered by this protest, may be admitted in evidence herein, and that upon this stipulation and the record previously made this protest may be deemed to be submitted for decision.

There is attached to the official papers now submitted an affidavit of intended use sworn to March 4, 1944, the same date as the entry. Since it appears that the importer has filed both the affidavits required by the regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury in connection with Public Law 211, we hold that the merchandise covered by entry No. CE 0107 is also entitled to entry free of duty under said public law. Our original decision is modified so as to sustain the protest as to both entries Not CE 0106 and No. CE 0107. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEBASTIAN HURTADO HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 20

- 72346

Agency No. A213

- 080

- 879

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12 , 2021 * *

Before : TALLMAN, RAWLINSON , and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Sebastian Hurtado Hernandez, a native of Guatemala and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 72346

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C

. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

the agency’s factual findings. Garcia

- Milian v. Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th

Cir. 2014) . We deny the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Hurtado Hernandez does not challenge the agency’s

dispositive determination that his asylum application was untimely and he failed to

establish an exception to the one

- year deadline

. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706

F.3d 1072, 1079

- 1080 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in

a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, Hurtado Hernandez ’s asylum claim

fails.

Hurtado Hernandez also does not raise any argument challenging, and

therefore waives, the agency’s dispositive determination s that his p roposed social

group of returnees with perceived wealth is not cognizable and that h e otherwise

failed to establish nexus to a protected ground. See id

. Thus, Hurtado Hernandez ’s

withh olding of removal claim also fails.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Hurtado Hernandez failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico.

See Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009)

.3 20

- 72346

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Experts" and
"Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and to the use of our report dated
January 29, 1999, except for Notes 2 and 8, as to which the date is April 30,
1999, with respect to the financial statements of SalesLogix Corporation
included in the Registration Statement (Form S-1) and in the related Prospectus
of SalesLogix Corporation for the registration of shares of its common stock.
    
 
     Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of SalesLogix
Corporation listed in Item 16(b). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
   
May 4, 1999
No. 66210.

#### Old Delft Optical Co., Inc. v. United States,

protest 60/18592 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that no notice of appraisement was sent by the collector to the plaintiff and that the appraised value of the merchandise was higher than the entered value, the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)). *United States*v. *James H. Rhodes & Co.*(40 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 488), followed.
Exhibit 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


In connection with this Annual Report of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)  for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathy Willard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:June 23, 2017By:/s/ Kathy WillardKathy WillardChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-48609on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2007 relating to (i) the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Waste Industries USA, Inc. and Subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006), and (ii) management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waste Industries USA, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 16, 2007