alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COST SHARING AGREEMENT   THIS AGREEMENT is dated the 1st day of July, 2006.  BETWEEN: MINCO MINING & METALS CORPORATION, located at Suite 1980 - 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 2E9  ("Minco")  AND: MINCO SILVER CORPORATION, located at Suite 1980 - 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 2E9  ("Minco Silver")  AND: TRANZCOM CHINA SECURITY NETWORKS INC., located at Suite 1980 - 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 2E9  "Tranzcom")  AND: AQUASOL ENVIROTECH LTD., located at Suite 1980 - 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 2E9  (Aquasol)  (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Sub-Tenants)  WHEREAS:  A. Minco has entered into an agreement with Guinness Tower Holdings Ltd. and Omers Realty Corporation to lease the premises located at Suite 1980, 1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 2E9 (the Premises);  B. Minco and the sub-tenants have entered into a cost sharing agreement dated October 1, 2004 and Minco and the sub-tenants agree that this agreement shall replace all other existing agreement(s) in their entirety.  C. Minco wishes to enter into an agreement with the sub-tenenats to share in the office expenses for the Premises as more specifically described below.  NOW THEREFORE it is hereby agreed as follows:  1. Minco and the Sub-Tenants agree that the shared expenses will include the following:  a. Office Rental cost on a percentage basis (the shared expenses) as more particularly described below:  - 1 -     MincoTrancomMinco
SilverAquasolTOTALRent42%15%35%8%100%ParkingStall #150%15%35%100%Stall #260%-40%100%Stall #350%15%35%100%Stall #450%15%35%100%Shared Office Expenses50%15%35%100%Annual Charge Back$300.00   2. Minco and the Sub-Tenants agree that the Controller of Minco is hereby authorized to allocate the shared expenses on the percentage basis as more particularly described above in 1(a) of this Agreement.  3. Minco will invoice on a monthly basis to the Sub-Tenants and the Sub-Tenants agree to reimburse Minco accordingly.  4. Minco will invoice on a monthly basis to the Sub-Tenants for shared employee salaries and benefits which will be invoices on actual time spent and the Sub-Tenants agree to such expenses.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed as and from the day, month and year first above written.   MINCO MINING & METALS CORPORATION C/S    Authorized Signatory   MINCO SILVER CORPORATION C/S    Authorized Signatory   TRANZCOM CHINA SECURITY NETWORKS INC, C/S    Authorized Signatory   AQUASOL ENVIROTCH LTD. C/S    Authorized Signatory  - 2 -
No. 53408.

protests 115851-K, etc. (Pittsburgh).

#### Joseph S. Finch & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Form 20FR12G Registration Statement of Aquasol Envirotech Ltd. for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.   Date: August 23, 2006   "Yenyou (Jeff) Zheng " Yenyou (Jeff) Zheng Chief Financial Officer, President & Director
No. 56922.

#### Paul W. Pettis *v.*United States,

protest 176740-K (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Before the First Division,

September 11, 1947

No. 51893.

#### James E. Fox & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 57803-K (New York).

*132Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are similar' in all material respects to the articles the subject of *Rolls Razor, Inc.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480) and Abstract 51306. In accordance therewith the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

March 13, 1968

No. P68/147.

protest 66/79905 (New York).

#### Haruta & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foreging protest consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Audit Committee of the
    Board of Directors and Stockholders
BUCS Financial Corp
Owings Mills, Maryland


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(No.  333-97399) on Form S-8 and (No.  333-47524) on Form S-2 of BUCS  Financial
Corp  of our  report  dated  January  24,  2003,  relating  to the  consolidated
statements of financial condition of BUCS Financial Corp as of December 31, 2002
and 2001,  and the related  consolidated  statements of  operations,  changes in
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for the years then  ended,  which  report
appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB of BUCS  Financial
Corp.


                                                   /s/ Stegman & Company
                                                   -----------------------------


Baltimore, Maryland
March 28, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANGELA MARTIN

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-2754

L.F. LAMBERT SPAWN, CO., INC.

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 15th day of April, 2002,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court (effective January 1, 1970), it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Carol D. James, 

 Deputy Clerk

mailed 4/15/03:

 Michael A. Moore, Esq.

 Robin J. Gray, Esq.

Civ 2 (7/95)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-02754-MAM Document 11 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 1 of 1
### Draper, et al. v. AMS , No. 03

- 15

- 00429

- CV

“ A guaranty must be strictly construed and a guarantor cannot be liable for th e modification to the gu aranty made without the guarantor’s consent. ” McKnight v. Virginia Mirror Co,. Inc. , 463 S.W.2d 428, 430 (Tex. 1971) 

### Operative Provision of the Guaranty executed by the “Individual Guarantors” (CR 27

- 30)
I, [Individual Guarantor] (hereinafter referred to as the "Guarantor") residing at [address], for and in consideration of your extending credit at my request to Assistant Pro, Inc. , a Texas corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchaser" ), of which I am a shareholder, personally guarantee to you the payment of twenty five percent (25%) all amounts due to Austin Manufacturing Services L.P. Inc., a Texas Limited Partnership, under Purchase Order 1682 for the purchase of 5000 Golf Guru units (hereinaft er "Guaranteed Portion"). I hereby agree to pay such Guaranteed Portion punctually if default in payment thereof is made by the Purchaser

. 

### Excerpts from PO 1682 ( Supp. CR 5)

“ Note: to be shipped direct to customer from AMS” Excerp ts from Trial Record re “amounts due” under PO 16 8 2

• Ex. 70 (6RR 697

- 853)(showing no amounts due under PO 1682 )

• Ex. 81 (AMS shows zero balance due under PO 1682 )(6RR 908)

• Ex. 82 (AMS shows zero balance due under PO 1682 )(6RR 909) (same as Ex 141 (6RR 424

- 36)

• Ex. 94 (Ex. to Orig. Pet. shows no “aging amounts due” under PO 1682 )(SCR 12

- 16; 6RR 1045)

• Wallace (AMS’ “guy on accounting”): amounts remained due on other POs, but a “zero balance” remained due under PO 1682 (2RR 329)

• Scoggins (AMS’ president) ( POs showing 1682 “do not appear in the aging ” (2RR 150)
No AMS Exhibits / testimony show any amounts due under PO 1682 ACCEPTED 03-15-00429-CV 12693492 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/14/2016 11:38:00 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 631 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 631

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 29, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3017) to amend the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 to reauthorize 
and improve the brownfields program, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-40 shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the bill (H.R. 3905) to require congressional approval of any 
mineral withdrawal or monument designation involving the National Forest System 
lands in the State of Minnesota, to provide for the renewal of certain mineral 
leases in such lands, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in the nature of a substitute 
consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-41 shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 
amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Natural Resources; (2) the further amendment printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered 
by the Member designated in the report, which shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, shall be 
separately debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to a 
demand for a division of the question; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Apparel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 31, 2011 and as amended by this Amendment as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (together, the Report), I, John Luttrell, Chief Financial
Officer of American Apparel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 2, 2011                                                   
|                                                                    
|/s/ John Luttrell                                                   
|John Luttrell Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
Before the First Division,

September 3, 1946

No. 51284.

#### Petition 6393-R of Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. (Pittsburgh).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the articles in question were obtained as an experimental proposition to determine whether they, as regular parts of a Canadian rectifier, were also suitable for use on an American rectifier. The customs broker testified that, in entering at the invoice prices, he followed the instructions of the petitioner, and that in so doing, he supplied the customs officials with all information in his possession. The appraiser testified that there was nothing in the attitude of either the petitioner or the customs broker indicative of an attempt to deceive the customs authorities or to defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ebank.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James L. Box, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




                                       /s/    James L. Box
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      James L. Box
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      August 14, 2002
- Home
- Who We Are    - Organization
  - History
  - Policies & Planning
  - FGDC Secretariat
- What We Do  - ADVANCEMENT OF THE NSDI
- Geospatial Data Act
- Collaboration & Partnerships
- Develop Geospatial Shared Services    - Geospatial Platform
  - Cloud Computing
  - Geospatial Interoperability
- Manage Federal Geospatial Resources    - A-16 NGDA Portfolio Management
  - Geospatial Platform Marketplace
- Standards Development
- Geospatial Metadata
 
- Initiatives  - Current    - NSDI Strategic Plan 2021-2024
  - Geospatial Platform Shared Services
  - NGDA Management Plan
  - Open Water Data Initiative
  - National Address Database
  - GeoPathways
  - Disaster Risk Resilience
- Emerging Topics    - Geolocation Privacy
  - Crowdsourcing
  - Education & Workforce Development
  - New Geodetic Datums
- Past Activities    - Cooperative Agreements Program
  - Fifty States Initiative
  - Geospatial Line of Business
  - SmartBUY
 
- Organization    - Overview
  - Steering Committee
  - Executive Committee
  - National Geospatial Advisory Committee
  - Coordination Group
  - Working Groups
  - Subcommittees
  - FGDC Secretariat
  - Collaborating Partners
  - Membership Directory
- Resources    - Key Publications
  - Download Geospatial Standards
  - Policies & Planning
  - Lexicon of Geospatial Terminology
  - FGDC Geospatial Services Status Checker
  - News
  - Calendar
  - Media Resources

****

#                     FGDC Approves New NSDI Strategic Plan 2021-2024                

        -  Home 
        -  NSDI Strategic Plan 
        -  FGDC Approves New NSDI Strategic Plan 2021-2024 

The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) has developed a new National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) Strategic Plan (pdf). The plan, which covers the years 2021-2024, was approved by the FGDC Steering Committee in November 2020.  The NSDI strategic plan was developed with inputs from a variety of sources, including FGDC agencies, the National Geospatial Advisory Committee, and geospatial partner organizations. The plan describes a broad national vision and mission for the NSDI, and includes goals and objectives for the continued sustainable development of the NSDI. The FGDC will work collaboratively with partners on implementation of the plan.  Additional information will be posted here regarding the implementation phase. 

#### Contact Us

**Office:**
**Fax:**
**Email:**

##### **Subscribe** to Our Mailing List                            for Important News & Updates

**Subscribe

******Like                                    us**

******Follow                                    us**

******RSS**

Policies & NoticesUSA.gov Download Adobe Reader  Download Office Viewers
No. 57587.

#### Puerto Rican Handcrafts et al. *v.*United States,

protests 118854-K, etc. (New York).

*283Opinion by

Oliveb, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands the same in all material respects as the articles involved in *Puerto Rican Handcrafts*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 18, C. D. 1493), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.13

                         AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND
                          RESTATED INVESTMENT AGREEMENT

                This Amendment ("Amendment") is made as of February 5, 2003 by
and among iDine Rewards Network Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
Samstock, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company ("Samstock"), and the
former members and distributees ("EGI Distributees") of EGI-Transmedia
Investors, L.L.C. (which entity no longer exists). This Amendment amends that
certain Second Amended and Restated Investment Agreement, dated as of June 30,
1999, among the Company and the other parties thereto (the "Second Amended and
Restated Investment Agreement").

                WHEREAS, this Amendment had been approved by a majority of the
Company's Disinterested Directors (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated
Investment Agreement).

                NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

                Section 1.      Amendments. The Second Amended and Restated
Investment Agreement is amended as follows:

                a)      Section 1.13 thereof is amended to read in its entirety
                        as follows:

                        "1.13 "Standstill Provisions" means Article III hereof
                        in its entirety."

                b)      Article IV thereof is deleted in its entirety and
                        replaced by the phrase "Intentionally Omitted."

                Section 2.      Miscellaneous. Other than as provided in this
Amendment, the Second Amended and Restated Investment Agreement shall remain
unaltered in full force and effect. This Agreement shall be governed and
controlled as to validity, enforcement, interpretation, construction, effect and
in all other respects by the internal laws of the State of Delaware applicable
to contract made in that State. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts.
This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

<PAGE>

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed as of the date
first above written.


IDINE REWARDS NETWORK INC.              SAMSTOCK, L.L.C., on behalf of
                                        itself and the EGI Distributees under
                                        power-of-attorney


-------------------------------         --------------------------------------
By: George Weidemann, President         By: Donald J. Liebentritt
    and Chief Executive Officer             Vice President
No. 60664.

#### John S. Connor *v.*United States,

protest 292637-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
Before the Second Division,

June 11, 1964

No. 68629.

protests 63/7830, etc. (New York).

#### Crown Curtis Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel bandsaws similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. E. Bernard, & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 41, C.D. 2386), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.