alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Opinion issued January 26 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— 

### NO. 01 - 15 - 00503 - CV

——————————— AIC MANAGEMENT , Appella nt

V. SANDPOINT CONDOMINIU M ASSOCIATION, INC. AND RANDALL

MANAGEMENT, INC. , Appell e e s On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2014 - 04767

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, AIC Management , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon2

2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in cou rt of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX . R. A PP . P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss t he appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle , and Lloyd

.
EXHIBIT
32.1




AMERICAN
TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E.
Durkin, III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




Date:
June 23, 2009


/s/ Thomas E. Durkin,
IIIPresident(Principal
      Executive and Financial Officer)
123 STAT. 2058 PUBLIC LAW 111–71—OCT. 9, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3593: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Sept. 23, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–71 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 to extend 

by one year the operation of Radio Free Asia, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF OPERATION OF RADIO FREE 

ASIA. 

Section 309(f) of the United States International Broadcasting 

Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6208(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘2009’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Approved October 9, 2009. 

Oct. 9, 2009 

[H.R. 3593] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, James L. Box, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ebank Financial Services, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 9, 2006         By:       /s/ James L. Box    James L. Box, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000,  AND  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               67,249
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         9,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                           11,018,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (2,612,806)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10,237,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                16,500
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (2,248,479)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10,237,570
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    713,136
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       343,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (471,369)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (101,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (59,973)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (59,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.003)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 76 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.76

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first 
 session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or 
      joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing 
                  appropriations for fiscal year 2000.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the provisions of 
sections 106 and 107 of title 1, United States Code, are waived for the 
remainder of the first session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with 
respect to the printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment 
of any bill or joint resolution making general appropriations or 
continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2000. The enrollment of any such bill or joint resolution shall be in 
such form as the Committee on House Administration of the House of 
Representatives certifies to be a true enrollment.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
exhibit1015-offerletterd






Exhibit 10.15 





 






Exhibit 10.15 





 






/s/ Heather Carter Exhibit 10.15 





 






/s/ Cindy Dieter 05/08/2020 Exhibit 10.15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               5,909
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       73,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,053
<INVENTORY>                                         48,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,197
<PP&E>                                              36,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     424,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               72,364
<BONDS>                                            100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            91,632
<OTHER-SE>                                          22,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       424,290
<SALES>                                            341,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   341,854
<CGS>                                              218,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      298,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     22,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 12,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (654)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        11,647
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .61



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6990FRANCISCO CURBELO, a/k/a Angel HerreraPeralta, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AARON E. MICHEL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-235-3-03) Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 1, 2006 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francisco Curbelo, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Francisco Curbelo appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Curbelo v. Michel , No. CA-05-235-3-03 (W.D.N.C. June 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TROY D. POSEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 591 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of January, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Aug. 13, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11842 ProFly Drones Pulse Aerospace – Vapor 55 

This is a request for an amendment to Exemption No. 11842 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–

1148, granted to ProFly Drones. This amendment will provide for the addition of the Pulse 

Aerospace – Vapor 55 helicopter sUAS to the inventory of approved aircraft for use during 

VLOS operations currently covered under Exemption 11842. 

These airframes are commercially available to the general public, as are all components used to 

complete them. In addition, all configurations of these components follow standard, wellestablished practices. No aspect of these aircraft is proprietary to ProFly Drones in design or 

manufacture. 

Pulse Aerospace – Vapor 55

VAPOR55 Airplane Flight Manual_RevJ.pdf (Uploaded to Docket)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.ii


                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Amendment to Employment Agreement is dated as of January 22, 1999
(the "Amendment"), by and between New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") and Jack Horner, Jr. ("Employee") (collectively, the
"Parties"). All undefined capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth
for them in the Employment Agreement between the Parties hereto effective as of
December 31, 1996 (the "Agreement").

         1. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         The Agreement has a term of three years from December 31, 1996, meaning
it will expire on December 31, 1999. The Board of Directors of the Company have
approved this Amendment to the Agreement extending the term of the Agreement for
an additional three years, meaning the Agreement will now expire on December 31,
2002.

         2. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall be one and the
same document.

         3. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Nevada.

         4. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have duly executed this
Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                   THE COMPANY

                                   NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.
                                   a Nevada corporation


                                   /s/ Donald A. Metke
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   BY:  Donald A. Metke
                                   ITS: President

                                   EMPLOYEE


                                   /s/ Jack Horner, Jr.
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Jack Horner, Jr.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          56,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,698
<INVENTORY>                                      8,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,426
<PP&E>                                       1,357,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                 184,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,275,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,869
<BONDS>                                          6,041
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     455,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,275,582
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,998
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,812
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,925
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANTHONY E. SUTTON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-2167

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 12, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and 

Keith W. Upson, Special Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, 

Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Copyrighted page(s) removed. Copyrighted material is not available in Regulations.gov since it may not be reproduced without consent of the copyright holder.

Removed pages can be viewed at the USEPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room.

Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW

Room 3334 Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: 202-566-1744

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Prologic Management Systems, Inc.

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated June 4, 1999, except for
Notes 1 and 15 which are as of July 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of Prologic Management Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March
31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended, which
report appears in the March 31, 1999 Form 10-KSB of Prologic Management Systems,
Inc.

                                                     /s/  BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Los Angeles, California
July 14, 1999
No. 57141.

protest 179493-K (San Francisco).

#### Henry Pollak, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial, plaintiff introduced the testimony of the customs broker who attempted to show that the articles in question are parts of table lighters not within any of the classes of merchandise contemplated by paragraph 1527 (c), *supra.*It was held that his testimony was insufficient to support a finding of fact favorable to plaintiff’s claim. The record containing nothing to disturb the classification adopted by the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.