alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

To: Annie Rebecca Elliott January 22 , 201 5

County: Fort Bend (Criminal )

Subject: RETURN OF ORIGINAL EXHIBITS

Ple ase acknowledg e the receipt of the original exhibits listed below. Please sign and return

the original to this court.

14

- 09

- 00275

- CR Damien Lamar Freddie v The State of Texas 06

- DCR

- 045741

State ’ s Exhibit 52, a CD

State ’ s Exhibit 53, a CD

Receiv ed by: ________________________________________

Received on: ________________________________________
Docket Number FAA-2013-0703

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?
**Exhibit 21**

 

Direct and Indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Waste Industries USA, Inc.

 

Black Bear Disposal, LLC 

CLD of Nashville, LLC 

Duplin County Disposal, LLC 

ECO Services, LLC 

Laurens County Landfill, LLC 

Moss Point Disposal, LLC 

Old Kings Road Solid Waste, LLC 

Railroad Avenue Disposal, LLC 

Red Rock Disposal, LLC 

Reliable Trash Service, LLC 

S & S Enterprises of Mississippi, LLC 

Safeguard Landfill Management, LLC 

Sampson County Disposal, LLC 

Shamrock Environmental Services, LLC 

TransWaste Services, LLC 

Van Buren County Landfill, LLC 

WasteCo, LLC 

Waste Industries, LLC 

Waste Industries LandCo, LLC 

Waste Industries of Mississippi, LLC 

Waste Industries of Tennessee, LLC 

Waste Industries Property Co., LLC 

Waste Services of Decatur, LLC 

Waste Services of Memphis, LLC 

Waste Services of North Carolina, LLC 

Waste Services of Tennessee, LLC
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc:

We have issued our report dated January 26, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries on
Form S-8 Registration Statement Numbers 33-32835, 33-38748, 33-42451, 33-49730,
33-83074, 333-19229 and 333-49110.


                                                     /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2001
No. 55760.

protests 171030-K and 170989-K (New York).

#### Fine Arts Bag Co. and Wing On Wo & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# L_2022133DE.01004601.xml

| 10.5.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 133/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 133/46

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2022/428 des Rates vom 15. März 2022 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 833/2014 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 87 I vom 15. März 2022
  )

Seite 14, Artikel 1 Absatz 5 neuer Artikel 3

Anstatt:

„(1)   Es ist verboten, in Anhang II aufgeführte Güter oder Technologien mit oder ohne Ursprung in der Union unmittelbar oder mittelbar an natürliche oder juristische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen in Russland, einschließlich seiner ausschließlichen Wirtschaftszone und seines Festlandsockels, oder zur Verwendung in Russland zu verkaufen, zu liefern, zu verbringen oder auszuführen.“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Es ist verboten, in Anhang II aufgeführte Güter oder Technologien mit oder ohne Ursprung in der Union unmittelbar oder mittelbar an natürliche oder juristische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen in Russland, einschließlich seiner ausschließlichen Wirtschaftszone und seines Festlandsockels, oder zur Verwendung in Russland, einschließlich seiner ausschließlichen Wirtschaftszone und seines Festlandsockels, zu verkaufen, zu liefern, zu verbringen oder auszuführen.“

---
No. 59384.

protests 237796-K, etc. (New York).

#### London Gramophone Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

*284Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Elder and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia

EARL BOBBY WALKER MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1220-96-4 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 24, 1997 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CULPEPER COUNTY John R. Cullen, Judge V. R. Shackelford, III (Shackelford, Honenberger, Thomas, Willis & Gregg, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant. Kathleen B. Martin, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Earl Bobby Walker was charged with attempted capital murder and convicted by a jury of the lesser-included offense of assault and battery. He appeals this conviction on the ground that he was never arraigned on the indictment. We reverse and remand. The parties are fully conversant with the record in the cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. Walker was indicted for abduction, rape, sodomy, and attempted capital murder. Due to a series of continuances and pretrial motions, Walker's arraignment on the attempted capital murder charge was inadvertently omitted. At trial, Walker was

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - tried on all four indictments, including attempted capital murder. He had not been arraigned and had not entered a plea. "[U]pon a trial of any felony, there must be a plea by the

defendant." Crutchfield v. Commonwealth , 187 Va. 291, 296, 46 S.E.2d 340, 342 (1948). The accused must have the charge read to him in open court and be asked to make a plea on that charge.

See Code § 19.2-254. If the defendant will not enter a plea, the court must enter a plea of not guilty before the trial may

commence. See Code § 19.2-259. "Without a plea entered in person by the accused, or by the court, there can be no trial of a felony charge." Roach v. Commonwealth , 157 Va. 954, 960, 162 S.E. 50, 52 (1932). This requirement is "jurisdictional in nature in the sense that without such a plea, 'there can be no trial of a felony charge.'" Cassidy v. Commonwealth , 210 Va. 80, 82, 168 S.E. 125, 126 (1969) (quoting Roach , 157 Va. at 960, 162 S.E. at 52). Walker was never arraigned and never entered a plea for attempted capital murder. Without a plea, the trial for attempted capital murder could not occur and was a nullity. His conviction resulting from that charge must be reversed. We reverse the conviction for assault and battery and remand for further proceedings if the Commonwealth be so advised.

Reversed and remanded.
No. 60370.

protest 247144-K *(New*York).

#### Regal Novelty Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that item No. M-846 is not in chief value of yarns, threads, or filaments, but is in chief value of ramie, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said item.
-  Bureau of Fiscal Service 
- Debt Management
- Debt Management Resources

# Debt Management Resources

This page contains links to the various Debt Management resources.

- Additional Links
- Debt Collection Legal Authorities Quick Reference Charts
- Debt Management Governmentwide Reports: Treasury Report on Receivables (TROR)
- Reports to Congress and to the President
- Federal Student Loans
- Guides, Forms, & Downloads
- Managing Federal Receivables
- Reports and Statistics
- Supplemental Background and Summary Information on DCIA-Related Regulations

Last modified 07/17/23
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1



                       INTEGRATED PROCESS EQUIPMENT CORP.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                           FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           1994        1995       1996         1997        1998
                                           ----        ----       ----         ----        ----
<S>                                      <C>         <C>       <C>           <C>           <C>
In thousands , except ratio data
Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing     (9,730)     10,670     (15,762)     (8,133)      (15,762)
operations
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                           941         879       2,031       1,707         2,031
  Amortization of debt expense             4,256         213          --          --            --
  Rentals                                    156         210         544         858         1,122
  Total fixed charges                      5,353       1,302       2,575       2,565         3,153
  Earnings before income taxes and       $(4,377)    $11,972    $(13,187)    $(5,568)      (18,915)
  fixed charges
                                         ---------------------------------------------------------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            --        9.2x          --          --            --
</TABLE>

         For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
(i) earnings consist of consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes plus fixed charges and (ii) fixed charges consist of
interest expense incurred, amortization of debt expense and the portion of
rental expense under leases deemed by the Company to be representative of the
interest factor. For the years ended June 30, 1994, 1996, 1997 and 1998,
earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $9,730, $15,762, $8,133 and
15,762, respectively.
Document

Exhibit 10.9


In connection with reviews of director compensation in November 2020 and in January 2021, the Board of Directors of the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation approved the following level of director compensation in the form of cash retainer and targeted value of equity, effective January 1, 2021:
•The base annual cash retainer payable to all directors remained unchanged at $62,000.
•The value of the annual equity award grant to all directors was increased by $4,000 from $54,000 to $58,000.
•The incremental annual cash retainer payable to:
•the Chair of the Board remained unchanged at $40,000, with the total annual cash retainer unchanged at $102,000;
•the Vice Chair of the Board remained unchanged at $20,000, with the total annual cash retainer unchanged at $82,000;
•The incremental annual cash retainer payable to Committee chairs is set forth below* (three increased, one remained the same, and four were added for the first time):
•the Chair of the Audit Committee increased from $12,000 to $15,000, with the total annual cash retainer increased from $74,000 to $77,000;
•the Chair of the Compensation Committee increased from $10,000 to $12,000, with the total annual cash retainer increased from $72,000 to $74,000;
•the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee remained unchanged at $12,000 (the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee currently serves as Chair of the Board);
•the Chair of the Credit Risk Committee was set at $6,000, with the total annual cash retainer increased from $62,000 to $68,000 (previously no incremental annual cash retainer was paid for this role);
•the Chair of the Enterprise Risk Committee increased from $10,000 to $12,000, with the total annual cash retainer increased from $72,000 to $74,000;
•the Chair of the Financial Risk Committee was set at $12,000, with the total annual cash retainer increased from $62,000 to $74,000 (previously no incremental annual cash retainer was paid for this role);
•the Chair of the Public Policy and Corporate Social Responsibility Committee was set at $6,000, with the total annual cash retainer increased from $62,000 to $68,000 (previously no incremental annual cash retainer was paid for this role) (the Vice Chair of the Public Policy and Corporate Social Responsibility Committee currently serves as Vice Chair of the Board); and








•the Chair of the Strategy and Business Development Committee was set at $6,000, with the total annual cash retainer increased from $62,000 to $68,000 (previously no incremental annual cash retainer was paid for this role).
* No director shall receive the supplemental retainer for being the Chair of a Committee if that individual is already receiving the supplemental annual retainer applicable to the Chair of the Board or the Vice Chair of the Board.
Federal Housing Finance Agency 

Naa Awaa Tagoe – Deputy Director 

Division of Housing Mission and Goals (DHMG) 

Naa Awaa Tagoe is the Deputy Director for the Division of Housing Mission and 

Goals at the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). She is responsible for 

oversight of single-family and multifamily housing policy and regulatory capital 

policy for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises). She is also responsible 

for oversight of the affordable housing mission activities and fair lending 

compliance of the Enterprises’ and the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Naa 

Awaa also supports the FHFA Director’s responsibilities as a member of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council. She assumed this role in July 2022.

Previously, Naa Awaa served as the Principal Associate Director in the Office of Capital Policy at 

FHFA responsible for oversight of the Enterprises’ credit risk transfer programs, non-performing loan 

sales programs, Dodd-Frank Act stress tests, and financial eligibility requirements for approved 

mortgage insurers, mortgage sellers, and mortgage servicers. 

Prior to joining the predecessor agency of FHFA in 2003, Naa Awaa held positions in financial 

services and management consulting. She earned her bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and 

her MBA from Stanford University.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dais Analytic Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy N. Tangredi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Timothy N. Tangredi              
|                     |  |  |  | Timothy N. Tangredi                  
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2022098EN.01010801.xml

| 25.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 98/108 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 98/108

---

DECISION (EU) 2022/485 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 17 March 2022

amending Decision 2010/624/EU concerning the administration of the borrowing and lending operations concluded by the Union under the European financial stabilisation mechanism

(ECB/2022/11)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 122(2) and 132(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Articles 17 and 21 and Article 34.1 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Deposits held with the European Central Bank (ECB) as provided for in Decision 2010/624/EU of the European Central Bank (ECB/2010/17) (2) should be remunerated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(1) of Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) (3) in order to ensure consistency in the remuneration of comparable deposits across the Eurosystem. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Deposits held with the European Central Bank (ECB) as provided for in Decision 2010/624/EU of the European Central Bank (ECB/2010/17) (2) should be remunerated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(1) of Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) (3) in order to ensure consistency in the remuneration of comparable deposits across the Eurosystem.

| (2) | Therefore, Decision 2010/624/EU (ECB/2010/17) should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Therefore, Decision 2010/624/EU (ECB/2010/17) should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Amendment

Article 4 of Decision 2010/624/EU (ECB/2010/17) is replaced by the following:

‘Article 4

The accounts referred to in Article 2 shall be remunerated in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(1) of Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) (*1).

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the fifth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 17 March 2022.

The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1.

1

(2)  Decision 2010/624/EU of the European Central Bank of 14 October 2010 concerning the administration of the borrowing and lending operations concluded by the Union under the European financial stabilisation mechanism (ECB/2010/17) (OJ L 275, 20.10.2010, p. 10).

2

(3)  Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank of 15 October 2019 on the remuneration of holdings of excess reserves and of certain deposits (ECB/2019/31) (OJ L 267, 21.10.2019, p. 12).

3

---
DAIMEYON DONTRELL O'NEAL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 2446

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 5, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County

. Christopher N. Patterson , Judge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Zachary F. Lawton, Assistant Public Defender

, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General

, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., WOLF

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          MAR-05-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                      423894
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            437897
<PP&E>                                        5452
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              941132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       104995
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      1559
<OTHER-SE>                                  834578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                941132
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              6859
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            259563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (252704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (252704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (252704)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.06)


</TABLE>
July 10, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10300.

#### Studebaker-Packard Corp. *v.*United States,

REHEARING MOTION DENIED

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


REGION 10 


1200 Sixth Avenue. Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3140 

OFFICE OF 

AIR, WASTE AND TOXles 

FEB 18 Z010 

Martin Bauer, Administrator 

Air Quality Division 

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality • 

1410 N. Hilton 

Boise, Idaho 83706 

Dear Mr. Bauer: 

At your request, EPA Region 10 ha~ completed and enclosed a copy of our analysis of 

TASCO's claim that it cannot afford BART and Idaho's initial BART determination identified in 

the "Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determination Analysis: Riley Boiler". dated 

February 6, 2009, for the TASCO Nampa Facility. This analysis contains data and information 

provided by TASCO that T ASCO claims as 'Confidential Business Information (CBI). Thus we 

treat this report as containing CBI. 

We have determined that TASCO can afford BART as identified in the initial BART 

determination made by IDEQ. If you have additional questions or would like to discuss this 

analysis. please contact either myself at 206-553-6985 or Mr. Steve Body at 206-553-0782. 

Sincerely 

Mahbubul Islam, Manager 

State & Tribal Air Programs Unit 

Enclosure
Before the Second Division,

August 27, 1947

No. 51882.

#### American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 707970-G, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 14,969.

#### UNITED STATES v. DIXON.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 92.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1813.

Sale op Liquors — Power to Grant License — City op Washington.

An indictment will not lie against an inhabitant of the city of Washington for retailing spirituous liquprs within the city.

[Cited in U. S. v. Holly, Case No. 15,381.]

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

Indictment [against Jacob Dixon] for retailing spirituous liquors within the city of Washington, without license under the act of Maryland, 17S4, e. 37, § 24.

The case having been submitted without argument, THE COURT decided that the exclusive power of granting licenses for retailing, and the exclusive power of regulating the same, was, by the charter of Washington, vested' in the corporation, and that the indictment would not lie.