alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered September 30, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00415 - CV JUST ENERGY TEXAS I CORP., Appellant V. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMM ISSION AND CEDRIC TH OMAS, Appellee s On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial Distric t Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 12 - 07637 - I 

### O RDER W e GRANT appellant’s September 26, 2014 unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 6, 2014

. We caution appellant that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 5
   <NAME> BELAIR CAPITAL FUND


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      2,272,347,422
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     2,479,188,542
<RECEIVABLES>                              14,739,550
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             366,343
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                       25,914,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,520,208,495
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                   0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    645,000,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  6,021,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                        651,021,948
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   1,716,881,706
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                      16,053,481
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      16,568,833
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  19,902
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    (63,089,652)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   215,374,591
<NET-ASSETS>                               1,869,186,547
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                          48,433,889
<INTEREST-INCOME>                          4,176,136
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                             47,286,935
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    5,323,090
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (8,001,500)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  2,014,396
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (664,014)
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                    0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                (515,352)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (63,661,825)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    (5,303,188)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  (55,088,152)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                      4,847,333
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         31,540,823
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                            47,286,935
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       1,997,919,000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                      116.66
<PER-SHARE-NII>                            0.334
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                    (0.564)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                       0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                  0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                       0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                        116.43
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                            3.16


</TABLE>
S02Y1069.

#### IN THE MATTER OF DARRYL EVANS.

(562 SE2d 512)

Decided April 29, 2002.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane*
      *165
      *Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*164Per curiam.

This matter is before the Court on Respondent Darryl Evans’ Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License, which he filed pursuant to Bar Rules 4-110 (f) and 4-227 (a). In the petition, Evans admits that on November 18, 2001 in the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, he pled guilty to mail fraud and false statement on his 1997 tax return in violation of 18 USC §§ 1340 and 1342, and 26 USC § 7206 (1). Evans further admits that the offenses were felonies and that entry of judgment on the plea constitutes a violation of Rule 8.4 (a) (2) (it shall be a violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct for a lawyer to be convicted of a felony) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and asks this Court to accept his petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law. The State Bar has no objection and believes that acceptance of Evans’ petition is in the best interests of the Bar and the public.

We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Evans’ petition for the voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment. Bar Rule 4-110 (f). Accordingly, the name of Darryl Evans hereby is removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Evans is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*165
      *Axam, Adams & Secret, Tony L. Axam,*for Evans.
Before the Second Division,

November 9, 1955

No. 59417.

protest 240150-K (A) (New York).

#### D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co. and American Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the. merchandise consists of 42,707 feet of 1-inch by Ko-inch chains and that said merchandise weighed 2.25 pounds per 10-foot length, had a net weight of 9,609 pounds, and was valued at 40 cents per pound, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 60703.

#### Rocca-Cuvi, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 280029-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

No objection being made by counsel for the plaintiff, the motion was granted, and the protests were dismissed.
No. 57907.

#### R. W. Smith et al. *v.*United States,

protests 187209-K, etc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel oil-well casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.*(41 C. C. P. A. 121, C. A. D. 540), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Chỉ Cần Một Cuộc 

Điện Thoại 

Quý Vị Có Thể Tránh 

Bị Tịch Thu Tài Sản 

Thế Chấp
 

Nếu quý vị gặp khó khăn trong việc chi

trả khoản vay thế chấp hoặc dự đoán sẽ gặp trở ngại

trong tương lai, chúng tôi có thể trợ giúp quý vị. Hãy gọi

cho chúng tôi để thảo luận các giải pháp giúp tránh bị

tịch thu tài sản thế chấp và giữ được nhà, bao gồm cả

việc sửa đổi theo chương trình Sửa Đổi Nhà Giá Phải

Chăng của liên bang. Nếu giữ nhà không phải là giải

pháp tốt nhất, chúng ta có thể khám phá các lựa chọn

khác thay cho việc bị tịch thu tài sản thế chấp, giúp quý

vị từ bỏ ngôi nhà và ổn định hơn về mặt tài chính.

Place your logo and contact information here. 

Company Name 

1234 Street Name Here

City Name, State 12345
H. Res. 714 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 30, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

695) to amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to 

establish a national criminal history background check system 

and criminal history review program for certain individuals 

who, related to their employment, have access to children, the 

elderly, or individuals with disabilities, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to consider 

in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a 

single motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House: (1) concur in the 

Senate amendment to the title; and (2) concur in the Senate 

amendment to the text with an amendment consisting of the 

text of Rules Committee Print 115–56. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be 
2 

•HRES 714 EH 

considered as ordered on the motion to adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
{"agency":"FERC","generated":"2019-07-25 14:44:08","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"}],"value":"2019"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FERC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["29"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["24"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["13"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2019","quarter":"Q3"}
Before the Second Division,

January 22, 1952

No. 56287.

protest 174832-K (New York).

#### Oxford University Press, New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the electrotype plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc.*v. *United States*(20 Cust. Ct. 78, C. D. 1088), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REAPPOINTMENT TO 

DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL 

RULES COMMITTEE

 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 611 

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2014, David J. Slesnick, Esquire, 

Allegheny County, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Domestic Relations 

Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years commencing January 25, 2015.
No. 58841.

protest 214321-K (Philadelphia).

#### Braided Fabric Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers in the case failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the classification of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 62 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 62

  Prohibiting the placement of ``Members Only'' signs in the House of 
    Representatives wing of the United States Capitol or in office 
               buildings of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2017

Mr. Fitzpatrick submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Prohibiting the placement of ``Members Only'' signs in the House of 
    Representatives wing of the United States Capitol or in office 
               buildings of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING ``MEMBERS ONLY'' SIGNS IN CAPITOL AND HOUSE 
              OFFICE BUILDINGS.

    The Speaker of the House of Representatives, in consultation with 
the Architect of the Capitol and the House Office Building Commission--
            (1) shall ensure that no sign stating ``Members Only'' is 
        placed anywhere in the House of Representatives wing of the 
        United States Capitol or in any office building of the House of 
        Representatives; and
            (2) not later than one day after the date of the adoption 
        of this resolution, shall remove any sign stating ``Members 
        Only'' from the House of Representatives wing of the United 
        States Capitol and any office building of the House of 
        Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1134 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1134

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act with respect to 
    restrictions on changes in benefits under Medicare+Choice plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1999

 Mr. Nadler (for himself and Mr. Frost) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
     to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act with respect to 
    restrictions on changes in benefits under Medicare+Choice plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Managed Care Notification 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS IN CHANGES IN BENEFITS UNDER MEDICARE+CHOICE 
              PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1852(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-22(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(7) Changes in benefits.--
                    ``(A) Prohibition of reduction in benefits during 
                contract year.--A Medicare+Choice organization may not, 
                during a contract year, change the terms of benefits in 
                a manner that is adverse to an enrollee.
                    ``(B) Advance notice of changes in benefits.--If a 
                Medicare+Choice organization intends to change its 
                benefits offered under this part in a contract year 
                from those offered in the previous contract year, the 
                organization shall provide to enrollees, not later than 
                120 days before the beginning of the contract year 
                involved, notice in comparative form of the changes in 
                benefits intended compared to those offered in the 
                previous contract year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to contract years beginning on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 63538.

protest 59/14998 (New York).

#### Marconi Instruments, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of klystron tubes the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marconi Instruments, Ltd.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 311, C.D. 1880), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-105254 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account
Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated February 19, 2003 of Hartford Life
Insurance Company relating to the financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and of our report dated February 21,
2003 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account Seven relating to the
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing
in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,364,776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,959,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,130
<INVENTORY>                                  2,780,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,407,857
<PP&E>                                       2,377,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                 120,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,280,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,375,792
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,470
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,219,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,280,210
<SALES>                                     16,763,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,763,050
<CGS>                                       16,003,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,003,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,073,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (488,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (488,745)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MERI JANE WOODS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 150 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 24th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Christine Russell, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/ Christine Russell                                               
|Christine Russell                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|February 11, 2008
Exhibit 99.1


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For JPMorgan Chase Capital XVII
Securities, Series 2005-2 (the "Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect
            of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in
            respect of the Trust during the 2005 calendar year;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust
            agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge,
            except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has
            fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
            Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar
            standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
            accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
            Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
            procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement, that is included
            in these reports.

Date: March 30, 2006

By:    /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
     -----------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President



<PAGE>