34966 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the Rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: May 28, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2013–13732 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0891; FRL–9823–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Wisconsin; Removal of Gasoline Vapor 

Recovery From Southeast Wisconsin 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the Wisconsin 

Department of Natural Resources 

(WDNR) on November 12, 2012, 

concerning the state’s Stage II vapor 

recovery (Stage II) program in southeast 

Wisconsin. The revision removes Stage 

II requirements as a component of the 

Wisconsin ozone SIP. The submittal 

also includes a demonstration under 

section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) that addresses emissions impacts 

associated with the removal of the 

program. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 11, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2012–0891, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012– 

0891. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to section I of 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

of this document. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone 

Francisco J. Acevedo, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, at (312) 886–6061 

before visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Francisco J. Acevedo, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6061, 

acevedo.francisco@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules 34967 

1 In areas where certain types of vacuum-assist 

Stage II systems are used, the differences in 

operational design characteristics between ORVR 

and some configurations of these Stage II systems 

result in the reduction of overall control system 

efficiency compared to what could have been 

achieved relative to the individual control 

efficiencies of either ORVR or Stage II emissions 

from the vehicle fuel tank. 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What should I consider as I prepare my 

comments for EPA? 

II. Background 

III. What changes have been made to the 

Wisconsin Stage II Vapor Recovery 

Program? 

IV. What is EPA’s analysis of the state’s 

submittal? 

V. What action is EPA proposing to take? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

When submitting comments, 

remember to: 

1. Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date, and page number). 

2. Follow directions—EPA may ask 

you to respond to specific questions or 

organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

3. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

4. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

5. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

6. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

7. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

8. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the close of the comment 

period. 

II. Background 

Stage II programs were adopted by 

some states beginning in the 1980s to 

meet the ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS). Stage II 

and onboard refueling vapor recovery 

systems (ORVR) are two types of 

emission control systems that capture 

fuel vapors from vehicle gas tanks 

during refueling. Stage II systems are 

specifically installed at gasoline 

dispensing facilities (GDF) and capture 

the refueling fuel vapors at the gasoline 

pump nozzle. The system carries the 

vapors back to the underground storage 

tank at the GDF to prevent the vapors 

from escaping to the atmosphere. ORVR 

systems are carbon canisters installed 

directly on automobiles to capture the 

fuel vapors evacuated from the gasoline 

tank before they reach the nozzle. The 

fuel vapors captured in the carbon 

canisters are then combusted in the 

engine when the automobile is in 

operation. 

Stage II and vehicle ORVR were 

initially both required by the 1990 

Amendments to the CAA under sections 

182(b)(3) and 202(a)(6), respectively. In 

some areas Stage II has been in place for 

over 25 years, but was not widely 

implemented by the states until the 

early to mid-1990s as a result of the 

CAA requirements for moderate, 

serious, severe, and extreme ozone 

nonattainment areas and for states in the 

Northeast Ozone Transport Region 

(OTR) under CAA section 184(b)(2). 

CAA section 202(a)(6) required EPA to 

promulgate regulations for ORVR for 

light-duty vehicles (passenger cars). The 

EPA adopted these requirements in 

1994, at which point moderate ozone 

nonattainment areas were no longer 

subject to the section 182(b)(3) Stage II 

requirement. However, some moderate 

areas retained Stage II requirements to 

provide a control method to comply 

with rate-of-progress emission reduction 

targets. ORVR equipment has been 

phased in for new passenger vehicles 

beginning with model year 1998, and 

starting in 2001 for light-duty trucks and 

most heavy-duty gasoline-powered 

vehicles. ORVR equipment has been 

installed on nearly all new gasolinepowered light-duty vehicles, light-duty 

trucks and heavy-duty vehicles since 

2006. 

During the phase-in of ORVR controls, 

Stage II has provided volatile organic 

compound (VOC) reductions in ozone 

nonattainment areas and certain 

attainment areas of the OTR. Congress 

recognized that ORVR and Stage II 

would eventually become largely 

redundant technologies, and provided 

authority to the EPA to allow states to 

remove Stage II from their SIPs after 

EPA finds that ORVR is in widespread 

use. Effective May 16, 2012, the date the 

final rule was published in the Federal 

Register (77 FR 28772), EPA determined 

that ORVR is in widespread nationwide 

use for control of gasoline emissions 

during refueling of vehicles at GDFs. 

Currently, more than 75 percent of 

gasoline refueling nationwide occurs 

with ORVR-equipped vehicles, so Stage 

II programs have become largely 

redundant control systems and Stage II 

systems achieve an ever declining 

emissions benefit as more ORVRequipped vehicles continue to enter the 

on-road motor vehicle fleet.1 EPA also 

exercised its authority under CAA 

section 202(a)(6) to waive certain 

Federal statutory requirements for Stage 

II gasoline vapor recovery at GDFs. This 

decision exempts all new ozone 

nonattainment areas classified serious 

or above from the requirement to adopt 

Stage II control programs. Similarly, any 

state currently implementing Stage II 

programs may submit SIP revisions that, 

once approved by EPA, would allow for 

the phase out of Stage II control 

systems. 

III. What changes have been made to 

the Wisconsin Stage II Vapor Recovery 

Program? 

Wisconsin originally submitted a SIP 

revision to EPA on November 18, 1992, 

to satisfy the requirement of section 

182(b)(3) of the CAA. The revision 

applied to the counties of Kenosha, 

Kewanee, Manitowoc, Milwaukee, 

Ozaukee, Racine, Sheboygan, 

Washington and Waukesha and was 

incorporated within the WDNR’s 1993– 

94 ozone 15% Control Plan. EPA fully 

approved Wisconsin’s Stage II program 

on August 13, 1993 (53 FR 43080), 

including the program’s legal authority 

and administrative requirements found 

in Section 285.31 of the Wisconsin 

Statutes and Chapter NR 420.045 of the 

Wisconsin Administrative Code. 

On November 12, 2012, WDNR 

submitted a SIP revision requesting the 

removal of Stage II requirements under 

NR 420.045 of the Wisconsin 

Administrative Code from the 

Wisconsin ozone SIP. To support the 

removal of the Stage II requirements, the 

revision included copies of 2011 

Wisconsin Act 196 enacted on April 2, 

2012 authorizing the termination of 

Stage II requirements in Wisconsin; a 

summary of MOVES2010b modeling 

results and Wisconsin specific 

calculations based on EPA guidance 

used to calculate program benefits and 

demonstrate widespread use of ORVR in 

southeast Wisconsin; and a section 

110(l) demonstration that includes offset 

emission credits. WDNR held a public 

hearing on the Wisconsin Stage II SIP 

revision on October 8, 2012, in 

Waukesha, Wisconsin and allowed for 

written public comments until October 

12, 2012. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
34968 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

2 2011 Wisconsin Act 196 enacted on April 2, 

2012 authorized the termination of Stage II 

requirements beginning May 16, 2012, the date 

when EPA finalized a rule determining that ORVR 

was in widespread use nationwide. Stage II 

decommissioning in southeast Wisconsin is set to 

occur within a four year period between 2012 and 

2015. 3Based on 4:1 NOX to VOC Ratio (i.e. 4 tons of 

NOX = 1 ton of VOC) 

4The VOC emissions shortfall was interpolated 

between 2013 and 2015 since the MOVES modeling 

was not done specifically for this year. 

IV. What is EPA’s analysis of the state’s 

submittal? 

Revisions to SIP-approved control 

measures must meet the requirements of 

CAA section 110(l) to be approved by 

EPA. Section 110(l) states: ‘‘The 

Administrator shall not approve a 

revision of a plan if the revision would 

interfere with any applicable 

requirement concerning attainment and 

reasonable further progress (as defined 

in section 171), or any other applicable 

requirement of this Act.’’ EPA interprets section 110(l) to apply 

to all requirements of the CAA and to 

all areas of the country, whether 

attainment, nonattainment, 

unclassifiable, or maintenance for one 

or more of the six criteria pollutants. 

EPA also interprets section 110(l) to 

require a demonstration addressing all 

criteria pollutants whose emissions and/ 

or ambient concentrations may change 

as a result of the SIP revision. In the 

absence of an attainment demonstration, 

to demonstrate no interference with any 

applicable NAAQS or requirement of 

the CAA under section 110(l), EPA 

believes it is appropriate to allow states 

to substitute equivalent emissions 

reductions to compensate for any 

change to a SIP-approved program, as 

long as actual emissions in the air are 

not increased. ‘‘Equivalent’’ emissions 

reductions mean reductions which are 

equal to or greater than those reductions 

achieved by the control measure 

approved in the SIP. To show that 

compensating emissions reductions are 

equivalent, modeling or adequate 

justification must be provided. The 

compensating, equivalent reductions 

must represent actual, new emissions 

reductions achieved in a 

contemporaneous time frame to the 

change of the existing SIP control 

measure, in order to preserve the status 

quo level of emission in the air. In 

addition to being contemporaneous, the 

equivalent emissions reductions must 

also be permanent, enforceable, 

quantifiable, and surplus to be approved 

into the SIP. 

The Wisconsin Stage II SIP revision 

includes a 110(l) demonstration that 

uses equivalent emissions reductions to 

compensate for emission reduction 

losses resulting from the removal of 

Stage II program requirements before 

ORVR is in widespread use in southeast 

Wisconsin. WDNR has calculated that 

by 2016, ORVR will be in widespread 

use in southeast Wisconsin and the 

absence of the Wisconsin Stage II 

program after 2016 would not result in 

a net VOC emissions increase compared 

to the continued utilization of this 

emissions control technology. The 

emission reduction losses resulting from 

removing Stage II before 2016 are 

transitional and relatively small since 

ORVR-equipped vehicles will continue 

to phase into the fleet over the coming 

years. 

WDNR’s calculation indicates a 

maximum potential loss of 0.02 to 0.70 

tons per summer day (tpsd) from 2012 

through 2015, were the 

decommissioning of existing Stage II 

systems to occur completely during a 

specified year. However, 

decommissioning is scheduled to occur 

over a four-year period from 2012 

through 2015. This extended period was 

taken into consideration to account for 

the costs and timing associated with 

replacement equipment and the 

decommissioning cost process. Table 1 

below summarizes WDNR’s emissions 

calculations of the yearly emission 

reduction losses during the Stage II 

decommissioning period between 2012 

and 2015 in tpsd and tons per year (tpy) 

and highlights the emissions difference 

that needs to be addressed as part of the 

110(l) demonstration. 

TABLE 1—(VOC EMISSIONS OFFSETS NEEDED IN SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN) 

2012 2013 2015 

Maximum Potential Loss of VOC Emission Credits (tpsd) ................................................................. 0.67–0.70 0.40–0.42 0.021–0.022 

Percent Stage II Throughput Decommissioned .................................................................................. 20% 50% 90% 

Tons per Summer Day Lost VOC Credit (tpsd) .................................................................................. 0.134–0.140 0.200–0.210 0.019–0.020 

Tons per Year Lost VOC Credit (tpy) ................................................................................................. 42.9–44.8 64.0–67.2 6.1–6.4 

The implementation of the Stage II 

program in southeast Wisconsin has 

resulted in reductions of VOC 

emissions. VOC contributes to the 

formation of ground-level ozone. Thus 

the potential increase in VOC needs to 

be offset with equivalent (or greater) 

emissions reductions from another 

control measure in order to demonstrate 

non-interference with the 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. 

On June 6, 2012, the WDNR submitted 

a SIP revision related to the state’s 

vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/ 

M) program. As part of that submittal, 

WDNR provided VOC and oxides of 

nitrogen (NOX) emission credits to offset 

changes to the SIP approved I/M 

program. These emission credits were 

from previously permitted emissions 

sources located in southeast Wisconsin 

that have permanently shutdown, and 

whose permits have been revoked. The 

expiration and revocation of these 

sources’ permits allows the state to use 

the emission credits associated with 

them for other purposes under the SIP 

and makes such credits permanent and 

enforceable. Table 2 outlines the 

remaining equivalent VOC emissions 

credits that are available between 2012 

and 2015 that can be used for Stage II. 

TABLE 2—AVAILABLE VOC AND NOX EMISSION CREDITS FOR THE STAGE II VAPOR RECOVERY PROGRAM. 

Year 2 VOC 

(tons) 

NOX

(tons) 

Equivalent 

VOC 

(tons) 3

2012 ....................................................................................................................................... 42 .02 46 .42 53 .63 

2013 ....................................................................................................................................... 86 .07 97 .17 110 .36 

2014 4 ..................................................................................................................................... 130 .12 147 .92 167 .10 

2015 ....................................................................................................................................... 174 .18 198 .66 223 .85 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules 34969 

Table 3 below summarizes WDNR’s 

Stage II emissions make-up 

demonstration. The table specifically 

highlights the annual emissions 

shortfall that will take place during the 

phase out of the Wisconsin Stage II 

program between 2012 and 2015. In 

addition, the table outlines the amount 

of equivalent VOC emission credits that 

are being used to offset the shortfall 

using the VOC to NOX conversion 

approach outlined in EPA’s proposed 

approval of Wisconsin’s June 6, 2012 

SIP revision (see 78 FR 24373). Based on 

the use of permanent, enforceable, 

contemporaneous, surplus emissions 

reductions achieved through the 

shutdown of permitted emissions 

sources, EPA believes that the removal 

of the Wisconsin Stage II program does 

not interfere with southeast Wisconsin’s 

ability to demonstrate compliance with 

the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

TABLE 3—MAKE-UP OF STAGE II VAPOR RECOVERY PROGRAM EMISSIONS SHORTFALL

Year 

VOC emissions 

shortfall 

(tons) 

Available VOC 

emissions credit 

(tons) 

Difference 

(shortfall-credit) 

(tons) 

2012 ............................................................................................................................. 42.9–44.8 53 .63 ¥8 .83 

2013 ............................................................................................................................. 64.0–67.2 110 .36 ¥43 .16 

2014 ............................................................................................................................. 47.0–49.6 167 .10 ¥117 .50 

2015 ............................................................................................................................. 6.1–6.4 223 .85 ¥217 .45 

EPA also examined whether the 

removal of Stage II program 

requirements in southeast Wisconsin 

will interfere with attainment of other 

air quality standards. Southeast 

Wisconsin is designated attainment for 

all standards other than ozone and 

particulate matter, including sulfur 

dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. EPA has 

no reason to believe that the removal of 

the Stage II program in southeast 

Wisconsin will cause the area to become 

nonattainment for any of these 

pollutants. In addition, EPA believes 

that removing the Stage II program 

requirements in southeast Wisconsin 

will not interfere with the area’s ability 

to meet any other CAA requirement. 

Based on the above discussion and 

the state’s section 110(l) demonstration, 

EPA believes that removal of the Stage 

II program would not interfere with 

attainment or maintenance of any of the 

NAAQS in both the Milwaukee-Racine 

and Sheboygan County nonattainment 

areas and would not interfere with any 

other applicable requirement of the 

CAA, and thus, are approvable under 

CAA section 110(l). 

V. What action is EPA proposing to 

take? 

EPA is proposing to approve the 

revision to the Wisconsin ozone SIP 

submitted by WDNR on November 12, 

2012, because we find that the revision 

meets all applicable requirements and it 

would not interfere with reasonable 

further progress or attainment of any of 

the national ambient air quality 

standards. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 

Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: June 3, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2013–13828 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS