alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 600 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 96
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 600

                          [Report No. 115-381]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 849) to repeal the 
provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing 
              for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2017

   Mr. Burgess, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 849) to repeal the 
provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing 
              for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 849) to repeal the 
provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing 
for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed 
in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 
bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 
thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 
and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                  House Calendar No. 96

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 600

                          [Report No. 115-381]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 849) to repeal the 
provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing 
              for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 1, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: REAPPOINTMENT TO DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : No. 611 CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 10 th day of December , 2014 , David J. Slesnick , Esquire, Allegheny County, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years commencing J anuary 25, 2015.
No. 50835.

#### Protests 992525-G, etc., of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bonbon dishes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*(33 C. C. P. A., 22 C. A. D. 310). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held properly dutiable at 70 percent under paragraph 212 without the additional assessment of 10 cents per dozen pieces.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1984

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Christopher Michael Goerdt lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: February 14, 2022 Filed: March 1, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Christopher Goerdt appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to bank fraud, wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and misapplication by

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, then District Judge, now Chief Judge, United States District Court the Southern District of Iowa.a bank officer. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging several findings underlying the district court’s United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”) calculations. Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not commit any procedural error in sentencing Goerdt. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (in reviewing sentence, appellate court first ensures district court committed no significant procedural error, such as improperly calculating Guidelines range); see also United States v. Jenkins-Watts , 574 F.3d 950, 960–61 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing appellate review of loss determinations). Further, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of American Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Adrian Kowalewski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | Except with respect to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 being unaudited and the absence of an auditors' attestation report on internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2009, all as described in the Explanatory Note of the Report, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




Date:February 6, 2011By:/s/ Adrian KowalewskiAdrian KowalewskiChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 21**

 

Direct and Indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Waste Industries USA, Inc. 

 

Black Bear Disposal, LLC 

CLD of Nashville, LLC

Douglasville Transfer, LLC 

Duplin County Disposal, LLC

ECO Services, LLC 

ETC of Georgia, LLC 

Laurens County Landfill, LLC 

Moss Point Disposal, LLC 

Old Kings Road Solid Waste, LLC 

Red Rock Disposal, LLC 

Reliable Trash Service, LLC 

S & S Enterprises of Mississippi, LLC

Safeguard Landfill Management, LLC 

Sampson County Disposal,LLC 

Shamrock Environmental Services, LLC 

TransWaste Services,LLC 

Van Buren County Landfill, LLC 

WasteCo, LLC 

Waste Industries, LLC 

Waste Industries Atlanta, LLC 

Waste Industries LandCo, LLC 

Waste Industries of Mississippi, LLC

Waste Industries of Tennessee, LLC 

Waste Industries PropertyCo., LLC 

Waste Services of Decatur, LLC 

Waste Services ofMemphis, LLC 

Waste Services of North Carolina, LLC 

WasteServices of Tennessee, LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 97

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    regarding the right of all citizens of the United States to an 
                    education of equal high quality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2000

  Mr. Jackson  of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    regarding the right of all citizens of the United States to an 
                    education of equal high quality.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. All citizens of the United States shall enjoy the 
right to an education of equal high quality.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to implement this 
article by appropriate legislation.''.

                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit

STEVEN L. TWENTER,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Respondent.

2012-3116

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in case no. CH752S110627-I-1.

ON MOTION

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and SCHALL, Circuit

Judges.

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The court construes Steven L. Twenter's October 15,

2012 submission as a motion to vacate the court's May 4,

2012 dismissal order, recall the mandate, and to reinstate

this petition for review. The United States Postal Service

opposes the motion.

Case: 12-3116 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 11/21/2012
STEVEN TWENTER v. USPS 2

Failure to comply with this court's rules, including

failure to file the required Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement

concerning discrimination, may result in dismissal of an

appeal for failure to prosecute. Julien v. Zeringue, 864

F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989) ("failure to comply with

this court's rules, including the requirements for preparing and filing briefs, appendices and other papers, may

result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute").

The court dismissed this petition on May 4, 2012 for

failure to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement. The time to

request reconsideration of that order has long passed.

Fed. R. App. P. 45(a). We therefore deny Mr. Twenter's

motion to reinstate.

Accordingly,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to reinstate is denied.

(2) All pending motions are moot.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s26

Case: 12-3116 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 11/21/2012
Before the Third Division,

November 7, 1958

No. 62429.

#### Ralph Valls *v.*United States,

protest 253590-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1121

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 5, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 18 Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, as the ‘‘Lewis R. Morgan Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1121 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 18 Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Lewis R. Morgan Fed5 eral Building and United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lewis

11 R. Morgan Federal Building and United States Court12 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18094 and #18095; HAWAII Disaster Number HI-00074]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated 08/21/2023.

*Incident:*                         Wildfires, including High Winds.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/08/2023 through 09/30/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/13/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/20/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/21/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Hawaii, dated 08/21/2023, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 08/08/2023 and continuing through 09/30/2023.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-23749 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136139 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 136139 COA: 279236 Genesee CC: 05-016313-FC BRENDA SUE DRAYTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
Case No. 14,969.

#### UNITED STATES v. DISTILLED SPIRITS.

[See Case No. 15,960.]
No. 64019.

protests 59/23668, etc. (New York).

#### Altray Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chewing gum similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fred L. Strauss*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 136, C.D. 2117), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1071

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Dwite Valentine Hall, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [Unpublished]

__________

Submitted: July 29, 1997 Fil ed: August 7, 1997

__________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

__________ PER CURIAM. Dwite Hall challenge s the 135-month sentence imposed byt he district court following his guilty plea t o 1 atte mpting to possess cocaine base and marijuana wit h inte nt to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C

. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We affirm.-2-

Hall argues that the district court improperl y sent enced him for possessing cocaine base, because th e government failed to prove the cocaine base seized fro m Hall-3-

at th e time of his arrest was crack cocaine. See U.S
. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(c), (n.(D)) (1995 ) (defini ng “cocaine base” as “crack,” which in turn i s defin ed as “the street name for a form of cocaine base , usually pr epared by processing cocaine hydrochloride and sodi umbicarbonate, and usually appearing in a lumpy , rocklike form”); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual App. C. a mend. 487 (Nov. 1, 1993) (stating that “forms o f cocaine base other than crack ( e.g. , coca pas te . .) will be treated as cocaine”).

We f ind the district court did not clearly err i n determinin g the government had proved by a preponderance of th e evidence that the drug at issue was crack. Se e Unite d States v. Williams , 97 F.3d 240, 243 (8th Cir

. 1996 ) (standard of review). An experienced narcotic s offi cer testified that the lumpy, rocklike substanc e admitted as evidence was crack; an expert cri minalist who had tested the substance testified that the drugs wer e coc aine base or crack; and Hall did not introduc e evidenc e to the contrary. See United States v. Wilson , 103 F.3d 1402, 1407 (8th Cir. 1997) (rejecting argumen t that evidence was insufficient to permit district cour t to conclud e form of cocaine involved was crack; forensic chemist testified substance was cocaine base an d
con clusionwas not contradicted by other evidence) ; United Sta tes v. Williams , 982 F.2d 1209, 1212 (8th Cir. 1992 ) (identity of controlled substance may be prove n throughcircumstantial evidence and opinion testimony ; experienced narcotics detective opined substance wa s crack cocaine).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the distric t-4-

court.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHT H CIRCUIT.
No. 60379.

protest 279690-K (Seattle).

#### Alfred H. Marzolf *v.*United States,

*427Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document

Exhibit 10.27






REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC. 
2021 MANAGEMENT BONUS PROGRAM 


On January 21, 2021, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Revance Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the Company’s 2021 corporate objectives, weighted for purposes of determining bonuses, if any, for the Company’s executive officers with respect to 2021 performance (the “2021 Bonus Program”).


The 2021 Bonus Program is designed to reward, through the payment of annual cash bonuses, the Company’s executive officers for the Company’s performance in meeting key corporate objectives and for individual performance in meeting specified corporate goals for the year. 


The Company’s 2021 corporate goals include (i) achievement of specified revenue targets (50% weighting), (ii) achievement of specified cash expenditures budget (10% weighting); (iii) achievement of operational, clinical and regulatory milestones (30% weighting), (iv) achievement of specified diversity and inclusion initiatives (10% weighting), and (v) additional stretch goals relating to: other clinical and regulatory and product pipeline timing and milestones (up to 15% weighting).


The cash bonus for Mr. Foley will be based on the achievement of the 2021 corporate goals (100% weighting). The cash bonus for the other executive officers will be based on the achievement of the 2021 corporate goals (75% weighting) and their individual performance goals (25% weighting). The executive officers’ actual bonuses for fiscal year 2021 may exceed 100% of his or her 2021 target bonus percentage in the event performance exceeds the predetermined goals and/or upon the achievement of other specified goals, including stretch goals. Payment of bonuses to the Company’s executive officers under the 2021 Bonus Program and the actual amount of such bonus, if any, are at the discretion of the Committee, and no bonus is earned unless and until paid.
# Sheet1

marcel.jemio@fms.treas.gov

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
No. 60387.

protest 240654-K (New York).

#### William P. McIntyre and Fanning Chemical Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Each of the drums bore one of six symbols or markings, and representative samples of each of the six groups were subjected to examination in the customs laboratory. The samples marked DS 3, DS 5, and DS 28 were found to contain more than 2 percent of free fatty acids, while those marked DS 26, DS 27, and DS 29 were found to contain 2 percent or less of free fatty acids. When the protest was called for trial, Government counsel stated that he had discussed the matter with the examiner and with the protest reviewer in the collector’s office, and they each stated that, if the matter were before them now, they would suggest classification according to the importer’s protest. On the *430record presented, the claim in the protest was sustained as to the merchandise identified on the invoice by the markings DS 3, DS 5, and DS 28.