alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2

                 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

     Section 11(a) of the Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  provides that if
part of a registration  statement at the time it becomes  effective  contains an
untrue  statement of a material  fact,  or omits a material  fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements  therein not misleading,  any
person acquiring a security pursuant to such  registration  statement (unless it
is proved that at the time of such  acquisition such person knew of such untruth
or omission) may assert a claim  against,  among others,  an accountant  who has
consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement
or as having  prepared any report for use in  connection  with the  registration
statement.


     On April 24, 2002, the Board of Directors of Factory 2-U Stores,  Inc. (the
"Company"), upon recommendation of its Audit Committee, decided not to renew the
engagement  of  Arthur  Andersen  LLP  ("Arthur   Andersen")  as  the  Company's
independent  public  accountants  for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 and
authorized  the  engagement  of  Ernst & Young  LLP to  serve  as the  Company's
independent public accountants.  For additional  information,  see the Company's
Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 1, 2002 and May 8, 2002.

     After  reasonable  efforts,  the Company  has been unable to obtain  Arthur
Andersen's  written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
registration  statement on Form S-3 (No.  333-105011) of which this Exhibit is a
part  and the  related  prospectus  (the  "Registration  Statement")  of  Arthur
Andersen's audit report with respect to the Company's financial statements as of
February 2, 2002 and  February 3, 2001.  Under  these  circumstances,  Rule 437a
under the Securities Act permits the Company to file this registration statement
without a written  consent from Arthur  Andersen.  As a result,  with respect to
transactions in the Company's securities pursuant to the Registration Statement,
Arthur  Andersen  will  not  have  any  liability  under  Section  11(a)  of the
Securities  Act for any untrue  statements of a material  fact  contained in the
financial  statements  audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material
fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a
claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
                 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                 EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT ON
                 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                 TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     9,346
<SECURITIES>                               536,724
<RECEIVABLES>                              5,854
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             551,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      373,668
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   303,584
<OTHER-SE>                                 (125,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               551,924
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           27,910
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           3,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         13,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            13,931
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        13,931
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               13,931
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.67



</TABLE>
H. J. Res. 129

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘December 15, 2000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.O., the mother and D.S., the father,

Appellants,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellees.

Nos. 4D21-1006 and 21-1086 

[August 31, 2021]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jose Izquierdo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2019-3399- CJ-DP.

Lori D. Shelby, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant A.O., the mother.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant D.S., the father. 

Carolyn Schwarz of Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee for Department of Children and Families.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Samantha C. 

Valley, Senior Attorney, Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, 

Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem o/b/o B.E.S. and B.A.S.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/Liu ChuanjieName:
Liu ChuanjieTitle:
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1042 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1042

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide civil liability for 
illegal manufacturers and distributors of controlled substances for the 
         harm caused by the use of those controlled substances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1999

   Mr. Latham (for himself, Mr. Foley, and Mr. Riley) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide civil liability for 
illegal manufacturers and distributors of controlled substances for the 
         harm caused by the use of those controlled substances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug Dealer Liability Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DRUG DEALER LIABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Part E of the Controlled Substances Act is amended 
by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 521. FEDERAL CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DRUG DEALER LIABILITY.

    ``(a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), any person 
who manufactures or distributes a controlled substance in a felony 
violation of this title or title III shall be liable in a civil action 
to any party harmed, directly or indirectly, by the use of that 
controlled substance.
    ``(b) Exception.--An individual user of a controlled substance may 
not bring or maintain an action under this section unless the 
individual personally discloses to narcotics enforcement authorities 
all of the information known to the individual regarding all that 
individual's sources of illegal controlled substances.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for the 
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 is amended 
by inserting after the time relating to section 520 the following new 
item:

``Sec. 521. Federal cause of action for drug dealer liability.''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

July 25, 1951

No. 55787.

protest 165567-K (New York).

#### W. & J. Sloane *v.*United States,

*290Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial counsel for the' plaintiff stated that on re-examination by a representative of the appraiser some of the items were found to be produced prior to 1830. With respect to said items, it was stipulated between counsel that all of the regulations pertaining to artistic antiques were complied with and that the following articles listed on the invoice are artistic antiques produced prior to 1830, except for certain charges for restorage: Item 68, except for a charge for restorage of $25; item 71; item 72; item 69; item 107, except for a charge for restorage of $20; item 109, except for a charge for restor-age of $20; item 45; item 73, except for a charge for restorage of $10; item 62, except for a charge for restorage of $20; item 38; item 128, except for a charge for restorage of $18; item 8; and item 5. Following this stipulation, it was held that the above-described items are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1811 as artistic antiques, except for the certain so-called charges for restorage. The protest was overruled in all other respects.
Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors of
  The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc:

We have examined management's assertion about The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.s (the Companys), a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc., compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America'sUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers("USAP"), to the extent the procedures in such are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Servicing Agreements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I) for CIT Equipment Collateral 2005-EF1.  Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Companys compliance based on our examination.



Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the minimum servicing standards.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards, to the extent the procedures in such are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Servicing Agreements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, except as noted in Exhibit I, is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



March 28, 2006









---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1097 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1097

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the $500 per 
    child tax credit and other individual nonrefundable credits by 
  repealing the complex limitations on the allowance of those credits 
   resulting from their interaction with the alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

  Mr. Neal of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the $500 per 
    child tax credit and other individual nonrefundable credits by 
  repealing the complex limitations on the allowance of those credits 
   resulting from their interaction with the alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIMPLIFICATION OF $500 PER CHILD FAMILY CREDIT.

    (a) Allowance of Personal Nonrefundable Credits Against Minimum 
Tax.--Subsection (a) of section 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to limitation based on amount of tax) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(a) Limitation Based on Amount of Tax.--The aggregate amount of 
credits allowed by this subpart for the taxable year shall not exceed 
the sum of--
            ``(1) the taxpayer's regular tax liability for the taxable 
        year, and
            ``(2) the tax imposed for the taxable year by section 
        55(a).''.
    (b) Simplification of Partially Refundable Credit.--
            (1) Subsection (d) of section 24 of such Code is amended by 
        striking paragraph (2) and redesignating paragraph (3) as 
        paragraph (2).
            (2) Section 32 of such Code is amended by striking 
        subsection (n).
    (c) Reduction in Income Threshold Amount for Phaseout of Child Tax 
Credit.--Paragraph (2) of section 24(b) of such Code (relating to 
threshold amount) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``$110,000'' and 
        inserting ``$91,000'',
            (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``$75,000'' and 
        inserting ``$60,000'', and
            (3) in subparagraph (C) by striking ``$55,000'' and 
        inserting ``$45,500''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
No. *62965.*

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/11359 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. R. 100

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To establish designations for United States Postal Service buildings in Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROXANNE H. JONES POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States Postal Service building

located at 2601 North 16th Street, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Roxanne H. Jones Post

Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the building

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Roxanne H. Jones Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. FREEMAN HANKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States Postal Service building

located at 5300 West Jefferson Street, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Freeman Hankins

Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the building

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Freeman Hankins Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 3. MAX WEINER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States Postal Service building

located at 2037 Chestnut Street, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Max Weiner Post Office

Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the building
H. R. 100—2

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Max Weiner Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JUNE 10, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-16364

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00283-CR-J-32-MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAMON LEE FLAGLER,

a.k.a. Been-o,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 10, 2009)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Call, appointed counsel for Damon Lee Flagler in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Flagler’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                       275
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,265
<PP&E>                                          52,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,104
<BONDS>                                         12,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,572
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,511
<SALES>                                         12,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,904
<CGS>                                            7,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message-

---- From: Russ Maguire [ mailto:rmaguire @ norwoodma.gov] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:12 AM To: Alfred CTR Burri Cc: Mark Raymond Subject: Norwood Airport; Taxi-Lane Object-Free Areas (Gate 2, Gate 3, North/South Taxi-Lane)

Good morning all , At this point, the taxi-lane object-free areas (TOFA) should no longer be an issue. Unfortunately, following any number of conversations by airport management, as well as public discussions , we still have issues. No one company (or aircraft owner) is exclusively guilty

. But by now, every airport business owner, aircraft owner and/or chiefpilot on this airport should be well aware that parking and leaving aircraft within the taxi-lanes (gate 2, gate 3 or north/south taxi-lane) , whether for fuel or otherwise, is prohibited. Please reinforce this message with your staff and co-workers.

The Norwood Airport is, relatively speaking, small. Onto this footprint, we have 10 commercially permitted businesses , any number ofcorporate and business flight departments and 187 based aircraft. This doesn't include all ofthe transient aircraft and ground traffic involving fuel trucks , maintenance and personal vehicles. So airport management fully understands our space constraints, which seem to be getting tighter and tighter. That said, we're asking everyone to honor these TOFAs for the benefit ofall. Thank you
.
Ru ss

Russ Maguire, Manager Norwood Memorial Airport
Before the Third Division,

September 18, 1957

No. 61203.

protests 194510-K and 204010-K (Philadelphia).

#### Ebeling & Reuss Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.