alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 

### Multi-Gas Forcing Stabilization with Minicam Steven J Smith; T M L Wigley The Energy Journal; 2006; Research Library Core pg. 373Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
[4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON "ClJRRENCES

ROunNG SYMBOL

Federal Aviation Administration Ii l,,-b. R

o ,

ROUTINGsniBOL.

INll'IMS'SIG

* * * * * *

This condition, if not corrected, could result in a deterioration of

the structural integrity of the frame.

One A300-600 aeroplane operator rep0l1ed that, during a routine

inspection, the Right Hand frame 40 forward fitting between

stringer 32 and stringer 33 was found cracked. The subject

aeroplane had previously been modified in accordance with Airbus

SB A300-57-6053 (Airbus Modification 10453).

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and conect an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

SUM-MARY: We are adopting a new amvorthiness directive (AD) for the products lis II I,p

. ROVTING ,YMBOl

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) IN'T:l,S,!"G Ii

Iwv.--

(DOT).

RIN 2120-AA64

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportatioll

ACTION: Final rule.

I }O

Ail"worthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 Airplane ;OUTI~GSYM~OL G

8=!t,~E:-

and Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, B4-605R, and B4-622R Airplanes

14 CFR Part 39 l"ITIA1.SJ:I

MTf. .

.. 2}1}IO (Docket No. FAA-2009-0993; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-089-AD; Amendme UTINGS\'MllOL

39J~ktl ***t}_£l9.j Ok05 [1(,,-RB

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these

~""""----

products.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Convera Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John R. Polchin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


By: /s/ John Polchin
John R. Polchin
Chief Financial Officer
June 8, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-518

In Re: RONALD GRAHAM,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Graham, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Graham has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

seeking an order from this court forbidding certain judges and

court personnel from further participation in any of Graham's lawsuits and directing that his cases henceforth be heard in Roanoke,

Virginia. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S.

394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are

no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. In re

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no

other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his

right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem.

Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Graham has not made

such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant Graham's application

to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

wold not aid the decisional process. We deny the motion to transfer, the motion to prevent certain judges from handling future

cases, and the motion to be subpoenaed as a witness.

PETITION DENIED
### M ICHAEL P. W ALLS

VICE PRESIDENT

REGULATORY & TECHNICAL AFFAIRS

americanchemistry.com ® 700 Second St., NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 249.7000 September 27 , 2010

Mr

. Jim Willis

Director, Chemical Control Division

Office of Pollution P revention and Toxics
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

, Mail Code: 7405M
Washington DC 20460

- 0001

Subject : Request for Ex tension to Proposed TSCA Inventory Update Reporting ( 75
FR 49656, August 13, 2010; EPA

- HQ

- OPPT

- 2009

- 0187 )

Dear Mr. Willis :

The American Chemistry Council (ACC) requests a 30

- day extension for development of

comments related to the proposed modifications to the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) under

the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) . In addition to allowing ACC and the regulated
community time to address the many substantive and practical issues raised by the proposal, a

30

- day extension will afford us a better opportunity to address the many specific issues outlined

in Unit V

.

ACC members will be directly and materially impacted by any change in EPA’s IUR
requirements . ACC and its members are very interested in moving forward with changes that
imp rove use and exposure information.

For that reason, A CC is developing substantive comments on the proposed changes outline d in
the August 13, 2010, notice. ACC is focusing efforts on the changes outlined in Unit I II

,

“ Modifications Affecting All Manufa cturers (including Importers)

, ” because, as stated on page 49660 of the notice, Unit III “describes the proposed changes to the IUR rule contained in this proposed rule.” Indeed, Unit III includes more than 80 specific issues or changes that require
input . Although the changes outlined in Unit III are substantial and complex, ACC expects to

meet the current deadline for comments in this section.Mr. Jim Willis

September 27, 2010

P a ge 2

T he issues outlined in Unit V, “Request for Comment

, ” however, go well beyond the significant
changes in Uni t III. ACC and its members intend to provide thorough and thoughtful comments on those issues as well, but need more time to develop input on the additional considerations that

EPA has raised.

If you have any questions, please contact Robert Kiefer at 202

- 249

- 6414 or
robert_kiefer@americanchemistry.com

.

Sincerely,

Michael P. Walls

Vice President
Regulatory & T e chnical A f fairs

Cc: Steve Owens
Wendy Cleland

- Hamnett
Susan Sharkey
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24426]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 2014 / 
Notices

[[Page 61596]]

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

Public Quarterly Meeting of the Board of Directors

AGENCY: United States African Development Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The US African Development Foundation (USADF) will hold its 
quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors to discuss the agency's 
programs and administration.

DATES: The meeting date is Tuesday, October 21st 2014, 8:30a.m. to 
11:30a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting location is 1400 I Street Northwest, Suite #1000 
(Main Conference Room), Washington, DC, 2005-2246.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rabayah Akhter, 202-233-8811.

    Authority: Public Law 96-533 (22 U.S.C. 290h).

    Dated: October 8, 2014.
June Brown,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-24426 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6117-01-P
```
### Fw: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

RobertJ Wayland to

: Mary Johnson 12/19/2012 05:32 PM 12/19/2012 05:32 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/19/2012 05:32 PM

-----

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/19/2012 05:29 PM

Subject: RE: Boiler MACT P reambleRule



### Hi Jim,

Below are a couple of interagency comments that have come in today on this afternoon’s drafts:

Major Source Rule.

Page 198. For consistency with equation 10, we believe the symbols X1 and Y1 in equation 11 should be

small x prime (small x with a bar over the top) and small y prime (small y with a bar over the top).

(Rephrased version of comment that was submitted by the SSC o n 18 December 2012.) As an aside, in

equation 10, perhaps X1 and Y1 should be Xi and Yi since it is a summation equation from i to n.

Area Source Rule.

Consider revising the definitions of 10

- day rolling average and 30

- day rolling average in the area s ource

rule to be consistent with the major source rule to incorporate the 240 hour and 720 hour of valid

operating data criteria, respectively. Both rules should probably exclude hours during startup and

shutdown as well as unit down time, from the rolling average calculations.

Regards,

Cortney

From: Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:50 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

Cortney,

Please replace the redline version I sent you earlier this afternoon with this version. A few edits were

made to the fourth year language on pages 26

- 28.



### (See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP for Major Sources Industrial, Commercial, and

Insti tutional Boilers and Process Heaters 2060 121912 redline w 121312v2.docx)Jim

_______________ James A. Eddinger

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

919

- 541

- 5426
December 22, 1944

No. 49902.

Suit 4443.

#### United *States*v. *Little Joe Wiesenfeld Co.*

C. D. 731 reversed October 30, 1944. C. A. D. 290.
|   | 1.  | the              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |     |                                                                                                                                            |

|   | 2. | the              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations              of              the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March              30 , 2006 |   | **XFONE,                INC.**BY: /S/ Alon                Mualem——————————————Alon                MualemTreasurer, CFOand Principal Accounting                Officer |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Before the Third Division,

August 6, 1951

No. 55805.

protests 62283-K (S) and 127767-K (S) (New York).

#### Roovers Bros., Inc., and Hertz Leather Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwauq, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.1

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The undersigned,  Christopher Martin, is the Chief Executive Officer of
First Sentinel Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

         This statement is being  furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

               A)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
                    U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

               B)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects,  the financial  condition and results
                    of  operations  of the  Company  as of the dates and for the
                    periods covered by the Report.

JANUARY 28, 2004                                     /s/ CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
----------------                                     ----------------------
Dated                                                Christopher Martin,
                                                     President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

November 14, 1961

No. 66209.

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/6780 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

An examination of the collector’s report, which was received in evidence, shows that said section 501 was not complied with by the collector, in that no notice of appraisement had been issued. On the record presented, the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)). *United States*v. *James H. Rhodes & Co.*(40 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 488), followed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Brian Fiddler, of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: April 30, 2013



|Brian Fiddler                                                      | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Brian Fiddler                                                        | 
|Chief Financial Officer                                              | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #20026 and #20027; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20000]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 10/30/2023. *Incident:*
                         Tornado. *Incident Period:*
                         10/12/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 10/30/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/29/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/30/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Citrus. *Contiguous Counties:* *Florida:*
                     Hernando, Levy, Marion, Sumter. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 20026C and for economic injury is 200270. The State which received an EIDL Declaration is Florida. 
 
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-24301 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Case No. 8,324a.

#### LEWIS v. HAMILTON.

[Hempst 21.] 1

Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.

April, 1824.

Sheriff— Liability for Costs not Collected— How Proceeded against.

1. When a sheriff fails to make the costs when practicable, he becomes responsible, nor will the order of the client or attorney as to costs change or affect that liability.

[Cited in People v. Palmer, 46 Ill. 398.]

2. He may be reached by motion.

Appeal from the Arkansas circuit court.

[This was a suit by Eli J. Lewis, clerk, against James Hamilton, sheriff.]

Before SELDEN and SCOTT, JJ.

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

In this case it appears that in the circuit court of Arkansas county, a motion was made by the appellant against the appellee to recover seven dollars and four cents, costs due him as clerk of that court, in the case of John Taylor, assignee of Richard Montgomery, v. *484James Young, and which costs the sheriff of Arkansas county failed to make on execution placed in his hands. The motion was overruled on the ground that it appeared that Taylor had transferred the judgment to Samuel C. Roane, and that the latter directed the appellee to stay the collection, of the debt. In our opinion it was error to deny the motion, for when a sheriff receives an execution on which costs are due a clerk, and fails to make them when practicable, the sheriff becomes responsible, nor will the order of the plaintiff in execution vary the case as to the costs, whatever may be the effect on the debt Reversed.