alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before Judge Donlon,

December 18, 1967

No. R67/128.

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisement R66/9310 (Charleston).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that United States value as defined in section 402a (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for determining value of the canned meat products exported from Argentina during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1959, and that such values are $20.3229 per dozen 6 pound tins, net packed, and $3.2454 per dozen 12 ounce tins, net packed.
EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Transitional Report of Aquasol EnviroTech Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken Z. Cai, Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Ken Z. CaiKen Z. Cai, Chairman June 4, 2008
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40909 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO SALAS-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Javier Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Enoc Lopez-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-134-1

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antonio Salas-Rodriguez ("Salas") appeals the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea, pursuant to a plea agreement, to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation following conviction of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Salas' plea agreement waived his right to appeal his sentence except, inter alia , an "illegal" sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1). Salas' court-No. 01-40909 -2- appointed counsel has not briefed the applicability of the appeal-waiver provision. The Government does not seek to enforce the appeal waiver. Salas' appellate brief asserts that his sentence violated the Eighth Amendment and that the enhanced penalties imposed pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 violate the Equal Protection Clause because the sentencing guidelines treat convicted-felon aliens differently from convicted-felon citizens. Salas' Eighth Amendment argument is foreclosed by this court's precedent. See United States v. Cardenas-Alvarez , 987 F.2d 1129, 1134 (5th Cir. 1993) (rejecting disproportionality challenge to 100-month sentence for illegal reentry). Salas' equal-protection claim is specious; aliens who are convicted of illegally reentering the United States after deportation following a felony conviction are not similarly situated to United States citizens with prior felony convictions.
See United States v. Cronn , 717 F.2d 164, 169 (5th Cir. 1983) ("The essence of an equal protection claim is that other persons similarly situated as is the claimant unfairly enjoy benefits that he does not or escape burdens to which he is subjected."). The § 2L1.2 enhancement provision does not violate equal protection because it "treat[s] all persons with aggravated felonies who commit this crime equally." Cardenas-Alvarez , 987 F.2d at 1134. Although Salas' appellate arguments amount to a superficial assertion that his sentence was "illegal" and thereforeNo. 01-40909 -3- appealable under an exception to the appeal waiver, his claims of illegality have no merit. This appeal is frivolous, and it is
DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Philip T. Cowan, Salas' attorney on appeal, is cautioned that the filing of frivolous appeals may subject counsel to sanctions, which may include not receiving payment for services rendered and expenses incurred in the appeal. See United States v. Gaitan , 171 F.3d 222, 222-24 (5th Cir. 1999).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 99.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Montgomery Realty Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dinesh Maniar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

                  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.



/s/ Dinesh Maniar
---------------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2002
CITY 

~ OF PRESCOTT 

City of Prescott 

Prescott Municipal Airport 

a•IZONA 

December 11, 2015 

6546 Crystal Lane 

Phone: 928 777-1114 

Mr. Byron Huffinan, Acting Director 

Prescott, AZ 86301 

Fax: 928 771-5861 

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S W 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dear Mr. Huffman, 

The City of Prescott is in receipt of your letter dated November 30, 2015 regarding the policy for 

use of aviation fuel tax. 

The City is aware of this requirement and the City Finance Director notes the funds are already 

being distributed to the airport. As a result, the City would seem to be in compliance with the 

current amendment and, therefore, no need for an action plan. 

If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (928) 777-1204. If 

you have any questions of our Finance Department, please contact Mr. Mark Woodfill (928) 

777-1222. 

Sincerely, 

City of Prescott 

Director of Economic Initiatives 

Cc: Craig McConnell, Prescott City Manager 

Mark Woodfill, City Finance Director 

John Cox, Airport Manager
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Brandon Truaxe, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Euoko Group, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Euoko Group, Inc.

Dated: April 15, 2008



/s/ Brandon Truaxe Brandon Truaxe President and
Chief Exeuctive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Euoko Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Euoko Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 71 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 71

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 1999

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 106-62 is amended by striking ``October 21, 1999'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``October 29, 1999''. Notwithstanding section 106 of 
Public Law 106-62, funds shall be available and obligations for 
mandatory payments due on or about November 1, 1999, may continue to be 
made.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 90 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 376
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 90

                          [Report No. 106-672]

   Withdrawing the approval of the United States from the Agreement 
               establishing the World Trade Organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2000

   Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Taylor of 
  Mississippi, Mr. Metcalf, and Mr. Hunter) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

                             June 12, 2000

  Additional sponsors: Mrs. Chenoweth-Hage, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Ney, Mr. 
                       Coburn, and Mr. Traficant
Deleted sponsor: Mr. Rohrabacher (added March 6, 2000; deleted March 9, 
                                 2000)

                             June 12, 2000

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to 
the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered 
                             to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Withdrawing the approval of the United States from the Agreement 
               establishing the World Trade Organization.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,  That the Congress withdraws 
its approval, provided under section 101(a) of the Uruguay Round 
Agreements Act, of the WTO Agreement as defined in section 2(9) of that 
Act.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 376

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 90

                          [Report No. 106-672]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Withdrawing the approval of the United States from the Agreement 
               establishing the World Trade Organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 12, 2000

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to 
the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered 
                             to be printed
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0405 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NATHAN BRYCE HARDIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 28, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2022

08/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0405
Exhibit 10.36


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF JOHN R. SPINA


 


This FIRST
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF JOHN R. SPINA (the “First Amendment”) is
entered into this 11th day of July, 2003 (the “Effective Date”), by and between
VendingData Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and John R. Spina
(the “Employee”).


 


WHEREAS, the
parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated February 24, 2003 (the
“Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
Section 5.1(b) of the Agreement provides for the grant of Fifty Thousand
(50,000) stock options to Employee at an exercise price of three dollars
($3.00) per share; and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to increase the number of stock options to be granted to
Employee.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.     Acceleration of Stock
Option Grant.  The stock options
reflected in Section 5.1(b)(2) and (3) of the Agreement are hereby granted as
of the Effective Date of this First Amendment and shall vest on the one year
anniversary of the Agreement.


 


2.     Grant of Additional Stock
Options.  As of the Effective Date,
the Company hereby grants to Employee stock options to purchase Twenty-Five
Thousand (25,000) shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock at two
dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per share. 
The stock options shall vest on the second year anniversary of the
Agreement, provided that the Employee is still employed with the Company.


 


3.     No Further Modifications.  Except as modified herein, the terms of the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as of the date and year
first above written.


 


	
  VendingData
  Corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ STEVEN
  J. BLAD

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Steven J.
  Blad

  
	
   

  	
  President
  and Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ JOHN R.
  SPINA

  	
   

  
	
  John R.
  Spina
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the use of our report dated May 5, 1999 in Amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement (Form S-1) and related Prospectus of America's Home
Page, Inc. for the registration of 3,248,750 shares of its common stock and
300,000,000 warrants to purchase 10,000,000 additional shares of its common
stock.


                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

June 18, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10K of ATEL Capital  Equipment Fund
IX, LP, (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  and
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Paritosh K. Choksi,  Chief Financial  Officer of
ATEL Financial  Services,  LLC,  managing member of the Company,  hereby certify
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:        3/29/2005



/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
--------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Executive Vice President of General
Partner, Principal financial officer of registrant
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 26

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1999

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Barber B. Conable, Jr.

as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Barber B. Conable,

8 Jr. of New York on April 11, 1999, is filled by the re-
2

HJ 26 RDS

1 appointment of the incumbent for a term of six years, ef2 fective April 12, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### Lapensohn *v.*Swann et ux., Appellants.

*Judgments*— Judgment *for possession*— Rule *to open judgment— Refusal.*

A rule to open a judgment of possession is properly discharged, where the depositions establish that the plaintiff had expressed a willingness to enter into a contract of lease under certain conditions, and that the appellant had failed to comply with those conditions, and that no written lease had ever been executed.

Argued March 11, 1924.

Appeal, No. 57, Oct. T., 1924, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., *193March T., 1922, No. 6670, discharging rule to open judgment in the case of Simon Lapensohn v. Thomas W. Swann and Ossie W. Swann, his wife.

Before Orlady, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Rule to open judgment. Before Ferguson, J.

The facts are stated in the following opinion of the court below dicharging the rule.

This is a proceeding to recover possession after sheriff’s sale. A judgment had been entered for the petitioner and the matter had been appealed. Whether as the result of an agreement of settlement or for technical reasons, the appeal was nolle prossed. A plures writ of possession was issued and the respondents have taken a rule to open judgment.

There is no defect in the judgment, but respondents contend that since the appeal was nolle prossed the petitioner and the respondents entered into a contract of letting under which rent had been paid.

The depositions show that petitioner, through a member of the bar, other than counsel of record, had expressed a willingness to enter into a contract of letting, provided the rental value of the house from September of 1922, was paid. The respondents attempted to carry out this arrangement, but failed to pay the amount stipulated for. No lease in writing was executed by the petitioner. One was prepared and sent to the respondents for signature, with the understanding that it would be signed by the petitioner and delivered after the arrears were paid. This writing was never signed by the petitioner and delivered, and, as a contract between the parties, never came into effect.

For these reasons the rule to stay the writ of possession and to open the judgment must be discharged.

And now, May 3,1923, the rule entered to stay and set aside the execution of pluries writ of hab. fi., issued in *194this case and to open the judgment heretofore entered and to let the defendants into a defense is discharged.

*Error assigned*was, among others, the order of the court.

*John W. Parks,*for appellant.

*Joseph D. Morelli,*and with him *Yale L. Schekter,*for appellee.

May 5, 1924:

Per Curiam,

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Judge Ferguson in the opinion in the court below.
Deloitte


Deloitte
& Touche LLP


Stamford
Harbor Park


333
Ludlow Street


Stamford,
CT 06802-6982


USA




Tel:
203-708.4000


Fax:
203-708-4797


www.deloifte.com











June 16,
2008











Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, N.E.


Washington,
D.C. 20549-7561





Dear
Sirs/Madams:








We have
read Item 4.01 of Cenveo, Inc.'s Form 8-K dated June 13, 2008, and have the
following comments:




1.
            We
      agree with the statements made in Item 4.01 (a) (i), (ii), (iv), (v), and
      (vi).




2.
            We
      have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statements made in
      Item 4.01 (a) (iii) and Item 4.01 (b) (i) and
  (ii).




Very
truly,




/s/Deloitte
& Touche LLP














Member
of


Deloitte
Touche Tohmatsu
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005

		OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER
		RE: ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Irwin Union Bank and
Trust Company as Servicer ("Servicer") pursuant to the Servicing Agreement
dated as of August 5, 2005, by and among Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company
as Servicer, Irwin Whole Loan Home Equity Trust 2005-C as Issuer, and
U.S. Bank National Association as Indenture Trustee (as such agreement may
be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the
"Servicing Agreement"), does hereby certify as follows:

A.	Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
	meanings set forth in the Servicing Agreement. References herein to
	certain Sections and Subsections are references to the respective
	Sections and Subsections of the Servicing Agreement.

B.	This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to Section 3.10 of the
	Servicing Agreement.

C.	The Servicer is the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement.

D.	The undersigned is a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

E.	A review of the activities of the Servicer during the 2005 fiscal
	year and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been
	made under my supervision.

F.	To the best of my knowledge, based on the above-mentioned review,
	the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing
	Agreement and any applicable Supplements throughout the 2005 fiscal year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Servicer has caused this Certificate to be executed
and delivered on its behalf by its duly authorized officer on this 7th
day of March 2006.


				IRWIN UNION BANK AND TRUST COMPANY



Attest: /s/Suzanne Mercier      	By: /s/Jocelyn Martin-Leano
	Suzanne Mercier			Jocelyn Martin-Leano
	Assistant Secretary-		Senior Vice President
	Home Equity Lending		Home Equity Lending
ALASKA JUNEAU 

AERONAUTICS , INC . 

May 21, 2010 

VIA EMAIL 

Dennis DeVany 

EAS Chief 

.X53 room 6401 

400 7*^ St. S.W. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Please accept this letter as a request for service change for El Dorado and Hot Springs, 

AR. We propose each city have two round trips to Memphis (MEM) and one round trip 

to Dallas (DAL) six days per week. This is based on the success Harrison is already 

showing as a result of having additional choice of destinations. 

We have received positive feedback from both communities for this change. We reserve 

the right to change the service back to the original pattern if after six months 

enplanements have not improved. 

A sample schedule is attached for your review. 

Sincerely, 

Rob McKinney 

President 

Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. 

SeaPort Airlines 

Wings of Alaska 

7505 NE Airport Way • Portland, OR 97218 • 888-573-2767 
ELD-MEM 5:15-6:15 

MEM-ELD 6:35-7:35 

ELD-DAL 7:50-9:00 

DAL-ELD 9:30-10:40 

ELD-MEM 10:55-11:55 

MEM-ELD 19:30-20:30 

HOT-MEM 5:00-6:00 

MEM-HOT 8:05-9:05 

HOT-DAL 9:20-10:30 

DAL-HOT 11:00-12:10 

HOT-MEM 12:25-13:25 

MEM-HOT 19:00-20:00