alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) of Highbury Financial Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the period certified.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard S. Foote                                           
|                       |  |     |  | Richard S. Foote                                               
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                  
|                       |  |    
|                       |  | By: |  | /s/ R. Bradley Forth                                           
|                       |  |     |  | R. Bradley Forth                                               
|                       |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 53407.

protests 114162-K, etc. (Minneapolis).

#### The Loucraft Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.2    
    


 
 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT    
    


        We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Rinker Group Limited on Form 20-F of our report dated May 20, 2003 except for Notes 38 and 39, as to which
the date is June 25, 2003, appearing in this Registration Statement. 



        We
also consent to the reference to us in "Item 10.G — Statement by Experts" in this Registration Statement. 


/s/
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 


Deloitte
Touche Tohmatsu

Chartered Accountants 


Sydney,
Australia 


September
25, 2003 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Andrew 
Sweeting and Louis Preonas of University of Maryland (WB23-57--10/26/
23) for permission to use data from the Board's annual 1984-2021 
unmasked Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained 
from the Board's website under docket no. WB23-57.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.

Regena Smith-Bernard,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2023-24339 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Case No. 8,335.

#### LEWIS v. WHITE et al.

[7 Chi. Leg. News, 116.]

Circuit Court, N. D. Ohio.

Dec. Term, 1874.

Removal or Cause under Act or 1866.

Motion to remand cause from the common pleas of "Ottawa county upon the grounds: First, that the cause could not be heard as to the removing defendants without the other defendants being present; second, that all the non-resident defendants should have joined in the petition for removal.

Prentiss, Baldwin & Ford, for the motion.

Willey, Terrell & Sherman and W. B. Sloan, contra.

Before EMMONS, Circuit Judge.

Held: That under the act of 1866 [14 Stat. 306], for removing causes, all the nonresident defendants need not join. That, however restricted the 12th section of the judiciary act [1 Stat. 79] and the act of 1S67 [14 Stat. 558] might be in this respect, the act of 1S66 clearly permitted a severance of defendants and gave the right of removal to any of the non-resident defendants on the proper affidavit, showing: Second, that a final determination of the cause could be had as between the plaintiff and the removing defendants, for that, although it was alleged that the title to the real estate sought to be set aside was held by one for the benefit of all, yet as the petition alleged that such title was obtained by fraud of all of the defendants there could be no trust to be protected as to any of the defendants. Motion overruled.
Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stan Lis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, of Stream Communications Network & Media Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 24, 2005



Stan Lis



Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0168

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KEVIN BRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 6 2022

12/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0168
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 685 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 685

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 11, 2018.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia.
     Committee on the Budget: Mr. Womack, Chair.
     Committee on Ethics: Mrs. Mimi Walters of California.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, ranked as 
follows on the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on the Budget: Mrs. Black, after Mr. Womack.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 17

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the 
limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

Mr. Serrano (for himself and Mr. Shays) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the 
limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the 
United States is hereby repealed.''.
                                 <all>
```
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark Jarvis, of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: April 28 2017



Mark
      JarvisMark JarvisChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of Convera Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended
January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew G. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By: /s/ Matthew G.
Jones


Matthew
G. Jones


Chief
Financial Officer


June 1,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          48,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,738
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,335
<SALES>                                          1,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,124
<CGS>                                            1,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    810
<INCOME-TAX>                                       326
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2323

In re: DARRYL DEVON GASTON,

Petitioner.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition. 

(1:06-cr-00310-JAB-1; 1:11-cv-00771-JAB-JLW)

Submitted: January 30, 2014 Decided: February 11, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Devon Gaston, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Gaston petitions for a writ of prohibition 

seeking an order directing that his criminal case be dismissed 

and that he be immediately released. A writ of prohibition “is 

a drastic and extraordinary remedy which should be granted only 

when the petitioner has shown his right to the writ to be clear 

and undisputable and that the actions of the court were a clear 

abuse of discretion.” In re Vargas, 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th 

Cir. 1983). A writ of prohibition may not be used as a 

substitute for appeal. (Id.) Gaston has not shown any basis 

for the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we deny the writ of 

prohibition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
March 11, 1953

No. 57154.

Suit 4737.

#### United States *v.*Mussman & Shafer, Inc.

C. D. 1367 affirmed January 14, 1953. C. A. D. 506.
---

|**Exhibit 32.1**                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**                    
|**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**                       
|**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                       
|**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this report of Alternet Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A No.2 for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report”), I, Henryk Dabrowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that:

| | 1. | The Report on Form 10KSB/A No.2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                     
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.

|Dated: August 20, 2008 | By: | /s/
      Henryk Dabrowski
|---------------------- | --- | --------------------------
|                       |     | Henryk Dabrowski          
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer   

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                       2,705,507
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,052,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125,000
<INVENTORY>                                    849,808
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,506,069
<PP&E>                                       3,048,187
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,154,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,963,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,597,156
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,474,760
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        94,946
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,157,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,963,779
<SALES>                                     53,711,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            53,711,839
<CGS>                                       41,927,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,927,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,395,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (382,065)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (992,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (265,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (727,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (727,743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-48609 of Waste Industries USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 of our reportdated March 30, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph as to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets*, effective January 1,2002 and the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, *Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,*effective January 1, 2003), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2003. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 

MARCH 30, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                               CERTIFICATION
                                PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Powder River
Basin Gas Corporation. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Brian Fox , as President, hereby certifies, pursuant
to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss, 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge
and belief, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780
(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/S/ Brian D. Fox
-----------------------------------
Brian D. Fox, President,
April 12, 2004
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

p1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141734

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141734 COA: 290284 Wayne CC: 08-002783-FC JAMES CONNER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 19, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.