T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T PED RO M EJ I A TO V A R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 73005 A ge nc yN o. A 200- 247- 102 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P e dr o M e

j i aT ovar , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , and r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU L 30 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 73005 2 j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence fa ctual f in d in g s , Li m v . I

NS , 224 F . 3d 929, 933 ( 9th C i r . 2000) , and w e r e vi e w de novo du e p r o c e s s c la im s , V

a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 32 4 F . 3d 11 05 , 11 07 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . M e jiaT o v ard o e s n o t c h a lle n g e th e a g e n c y ’s d is p o s itiv e f in d in g th a t h is ap p lic a tio n f

o ra s y lu m w a s u n tim e ly . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g th a t M e

jiaT o v arf

a ile dto e s tab lis h p a s t p e r s e c u tio n b a s e do n th e th r e a ts h e r e c e iv e d , th e s h o o tin g in c id e n t, an dth e in c id e n t w ith th e g r e n a d e . Se e L im , 2 2 4 F .3 da t 9 3 6 ; H o x h a v . A s h c r o

ft , 31 9 F . 3d 11 79 , 11 82 (9th C i r. 20 03 ) ( pet i t i on erfa i l ed t o p re se ntevi dence that c om pe l l e d af

i ndi ng of pa s tpe r s e c ut i on) . S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e a l s o s upport s the fi nd i ng thatM ej i a T ov arfa i l ed t o d em on strat e acl ear probabi l i ty of f uture harm b e c au s e th e r e is n o e v id e n c e th a t an y o n e is s till lo o k in g f o rh im . See N

ag ou lko v. I NS , 3 3 3 F .3 d1 0 1 2 , 1 0 1 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( f u tu r e f e arw a s s p e c u la tiv e ) . A cco rd i n g l y, M ej i a T o v ar’ s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. In addi t i on , subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef be c aus e M e

j i aT ovarf

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nothe w i l l be to rtu r e db yo rw ith th e a c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e g o v e rn m e n t o f

E l S a lv a d o r . See Si laya v. Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 6 6 , 1 0 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) .12- 73005 3 F i nal l y, M ej i a T ov arcl ai m s he w as deni ed du e proces s bec ause the agency fa i l ed t o g i ve hi m t i m e t o p rovi de supp l em ent ary s up po rt i ng do cum ent s and fa i l ed t o c o n s i d e rth e e v i d e n c e h e s ub m i tt e d . T h i s c l a i m f a i l s b e c au s e h e h a s n o ts h o wn how the doc um e nt s he s ubm i tt e d orw ant e d t o s ubm i tw oul d ha ve a f f e c t e d the o u tc o m e . See La ta v . I

NS , 2 0 4 F . 3 d1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) (p et i t i o n er m u st s h o w p r e ju d ic e to e s tab lis h adu e p r o c e s s v io la tio n ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.