alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.207

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN
Effective January 1, 2017
WHEREAS, Erie Indemnity Company (the “Company”) maintains the Erie Indemnity Company Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, Article 7 of the Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan provided such amendment is made pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to remove Article 5.3(a) of the Plan which allows the Company to delay a payment of nonqualified deferred compensation to the extent that the Company reasonably anticipates that the payment would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 due to changes in how that provision is applied; and
WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the aforementioned amendment by resolution on December 8, 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Company hereby amends in its entirety Article 5.3(a) of the Plan as follows, effective as of December 31, 2020:
a)    [Intentionally Omitted]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed this 24th day of December, 2020.
						
		ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
		
	ATTEST:	
		
	/s/ Brian W. Bolash
	By:  /s/ Timothy NeCastro

		
		Title:  President and CEO
Before the Second Division,

April 30, 1957

No. 60706.

#### Frank Thompson v. United States,

protest 283528-K/7756 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial, Government counsel moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that the proceeding was, in substance, an appeal for a reappraisement in protest form. From the record, it appeared that written notice of appraisement was mailed to the consignee in due course, as provided in section 501, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1501), as amended, but that no appeal for a reappraisement was ever filed, and that plaintiff herein had thereby lost the avenue of possible relief which was provided for him. The protest was, therefore, dismissed.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 29

Expressing the opposition of Congress to any deployment of United States

ground forces in Kosovo, a province in the Republic of Serbia, for

peacemaking or peacekeeping purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mrs. FOWLER (for herself, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr.

YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. STEARNS, Mrs. BONO, Mr. WICKER, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr.

HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BEREUTER,

Mr. HANSEN, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. ROHRABACHER,

Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. BRADY of

Texas, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. HILLEARY, and Mr. FOLEY)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the opposition of Congress to any deployment

of United States ground forces in Kosovo, a province

in the Republic of Serbia, for peacemaking or peacekeeping purposes.

Whereas President Clinton is contemplating the introduction

of United States ground forces into Kosovo as part of a

larger North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) operation to conduct peacemaking or peacekeeping between

hostile parties in Kosovo, and these United States ground

forces may be subject to foreign command;
2

•HCON 29 IH

Whereas Kosovo, unlike Bosnia, is a province in the Republic

of Serbia, a sovereign state;

Whereas United States national security interests in Kosovo

do not rise to a level that warrants the introduction of

United States ground forces;

Whereas an Act of Congress is necessary for the introduction

of the Armed Forces of the United States into hostilities

or situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is

clearly indicated by the circumstances, when such action

is not required for the defense of the United States, its

Armed Forces, or its nationals;

Whereas the Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, has opposed the deployment of ground forces in Kosovo, as reflected in his testimony before Congress on October 6,

1998;

Whereas the lessons of United States military involvement in

Bosnia clearly argue that the costs and duration of any

such deployment for peacekeeping purposes will be much

heavier and much longer than initially foreseen; and

Whereas the substantial drain on military readiness of a deployment in Kosovo would be inconsistent with the need,

recently acknowledged by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to reverse the trends which are decimating the ability of the

Armed Forces of the United States to carry out the basic

National Military Strategy of the United States: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress hereby expresses its opposition

3 to any deployment of United States ground forces into the
3

•HCON 29 IH

1 Serbian province of Kosovo for peacemaking or peacekeep2 ing purposes.

Æ
EXHIBIT 4.27

                            [World Gaming Letterhead]

06 September, 2002

Mr. Liam Gillen,
Galley Bay,
English Harbour,
Antigua.

Dear Liam,

This letter serves to confirm in writing our understanding of the verbal
agreement we have reached regarding your departure from World Gaming.

It is agreed that your contract expires on 26 November, 2002. It is also agreed
that you will officially end your duties as Managing Director of Antigua
Operations on 30 September, 2002.

In recognition for your valued contribution during your tenure with World Gaming
Plc, we agree to continue payments of your salary and allowances until the end
of your contract. In consideration of this, you have agreed to continue to be a
`friend' to World Gaming, and provide handover and transitional assistance when
required.

Outstanding payment due to you is US $28,310.59, which is broken down as
follows: Salary and allowances for October, 2002 ($13,416.66), Salary and
allowances for November, 2002 ($13,416.66), 17 days Vacation Pay ($7,727.27).
Deducted from the amount is $6,250.00, which is the balance owing on your
Employee Account as at 01 October 2002, for a credit card loan.

Payment will be made to you in 6 equal installments of $4,718.43 to be paid on
15th and 30th of the month, October through December, 2002.

On behalf of the management and employees, I wish you the very best in your
future endeavors.

Kindly indicate by your signature that you have read and accept the above
mentioned payment terms.

Sincerely,

David Craven
CEO

Cc Lucette James-Wint
Director of Human Resources


_______________________________         _____________
Accepted by Liam Gillen                 Date


               LONDON * ANTIGUA * VANCOUVER * GIBRALTAR * TORONTO
# L_2023017EN.01009901.xml

| 19.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 17/99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 17/99

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1363 of 3 August 2022 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2,4-D, azoxystrobin, cyhalofop-butyl, cymoxanil, fenhexamid, flazasulfuron, florasulam, fluroxypyr, iprovalicarb and silthiofam in or on certain products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 205 of 5 August 2022
  )

On page 211, in the 10th column of the header of the table in the Annex:

for:

‘Fluroxypyr (sum of fluroxypyr, its salts, its esters, and its conjugates, expressed as fluroxypyr) (R)’,

read:

‘Fluroxypyr (sum of fluroxypyr, its salts, its esters, and its conjugates, expressed as fluroxypyr) (R) (A)’.

On page 226, in the Annex:

for:

‘Fluroxypyr (sum of fluroxypyr, its salts, its esters, and its conjugates, expressed as fluroxypyr) (R)

(R) = The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number:

Fluroxypyr — code 1000000 except 1040000: Fluroxypyr (sum of fluroxypyr and its salts, expressed as fluroxypyr)’,

read:

‘Fluroxypyr (sum of fluroxypyr, its salts, its esters, and its conjugates, expressed as fluroxypyr) (R) (A)

(R) = The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number:

Fluroxypyr — code 1000000 except 1040000: Fluroxypyr (sum of fluroxypyr and its salts, expressed as fluroxypyr)

(A) = The EU reference labs identified the reference standard for fluroxypyr conjugates as commercially not available. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the commercial availability of the reference standard referred to in the first sentence by 1 July 2016, or, if that reference standard is not commercially available by that date, the unavailability of it.’.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
R. Pekarsky, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ James R. Pekarsky


James R. Pekarsky
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
No. 59434.

protest 226401-K (New York)

#### Esso Standard Oil Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that duty was assessed on a landed quantity of 104,649 gallons, which included 6.8 percent bottom sediment and water; that the amount of moisture and impurities usually found in and upon such or similar merchandise does not exceed 1 percent; that the importer filed an application for an allowance of 5.8 percent for excessive moisture and other impurities; and that the collector’s memorandum accompanying the protest be received in evidence. The collector’s memorandum' states that the application for an allowance was timely filed and that an allowance should be made for bottom sediment and water to the extent of 5.8 percent. In view of the stipulation and the collector’s memorandum, it was held that an allowance should be made in the quantity of merchandise upon which internal revenue tax was assessed to the extent of 5.8 percent, for excessive moisture and impurities, in accordance with section 507, Tariff Act of 1930, and the regulations issued thereunder.
**Exhibit 13.1**

----

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Haste, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: June 30, 2005

|   | /s/ Andrew Haste      _______________________________      Andrew Haste      Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TANYA BASTIAN : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

UNUMPROVIDENT CORP. et al. : NO. 02-4078

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2002, it is ORDERED

that a

[X] preliminary pretrial conference 

[ ] final pretrial conference

[ ] settlement conference

[ ] status conference

in the above-captioned case will be held on August 20, 2002 at 10:45 a.m. before the Honorable

Cynthia M. Rufe. This conference will be held

[x] in chambers, Room 4000

[ ] by telephone* 

*Counsel for the plaintiff will be responsible for contacting all parties, at

which time you may contact Judge Rufe's chambers at (267)-299-7490.

If trial counsel is on trial in a court of record prior to the time of the conference, the

Judge and opposing counsel should be advised of this in writing at the earliest possible date. 

Another attorney in such trial counsel's office, who should be as familiar as is feasible with the

case, have authority from the client, and an evaluation of the case for settlement purposes, should

appear at the conference.

Failure to comply with this directive may result in the imposition of sanctions. The

conference will be continued to another date only under exceptional circumstances. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/

 ________________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. 

 

Case 2:02-cv-04078-CMR Document 4 Filed 07/29/2002 Page 1 of 3
SCHEDULING INFORMATION REPORT

(To be completed and returned to Judge Rufe’s

Chambers three (3) days before the pretrial conference)

Caption: 

Civil Action No.: 

Jury Trial Non-Jury Trial Arbitration 

Plaintiff’s Counsel: 

Address: 

Phone: Fax: 

Defendant’s Counsel: 

Address: 

Phone: Fax: 

Have you complied with the duty of self-executing disclosure under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26(a)?

 When? If not, why? 

 

Have you filed a discovery plan pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)?

 When? If not, why? 

 

Discovery completed? If not, when? 

If you contend the discovery period should exceed four months after the last appearance by all

defendants is filed, please state reasons:

 

 

Case 2:02-cv-04078-CMR Document 4 Filed 07/29/2002 Page 2 of 3
Ready for trial by: 

 Date

Is a settlement conference likely to be helpful? 

If so, when: Early (yes/no) After discovery 

Do you expect to file a case dispositive motion? 

 

If so, by what date? 

Trial time estimate: 

Time to present your case: 

Time for entire trial: 

Date: 

Signature of counsel preparing the form

 

Typed or printed name

Case 2:02-cv-04078-CMR Document 4 Filed 07/29/2002 Page 3 of 3
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN CARLOS AGUEROS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 0 6 3

- CR

Appeal from the

277 th District Court

of Williamson County, Texas

(TC# 02

- 940

- K277 )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right

of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the

trial court clerk within twenty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later

than July 3 , 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of June , 2016

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
No. 52465.

protest 9873-K (New York).

#### John Zimmermann Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of hemp hats and hat bodies similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Abstract 46497, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
J-A33020-15

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

MARK WEBB, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR 

THE ESTATE OF SABINO WEBB, 

DECEASED

 Appellant

v.

VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, 

VOLVO CARS CORPORATION, GRACO 

CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS, INC. (D/B/T/A 

NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.), WILLIAM 

JULIAN, AND ANA (WEBB) SOARES

 Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 

 No. 1367 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Judgment Entered March 26, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 

Civil Division at No: 110500208

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., STABILE, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.:FILED June 24, 2016

I agree with and join the Majority’s erudite disposition of this matter 

holding that Appellant is entitled to a new trial based on the trial court’s 

erroneous jury instruction. My joinder includes the Majority’s discussion of 

Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014). I write separately 

to note my position that, in light of the Majority’s holding, it is unnecessary 

and perhaps confusing to address the remaining issues on appeal. To say 

that an evidentiary ruling is not an abuse of discretion does not preclude the 

possibility that the opposite ruling also would not be an abuse of discretion. 

Therefore, I respectfully concur.
No. 62423.

#### S. Beilin *v.*United States,

protest 278336-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 676), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

SHIRK, et al. : 02-2635

WATSON, et al. : 02-2735

HOOD, et al. : 02-2736

HART : 02-2737

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-2738

KINIUK, et al. : 02-2845

HRYCYK, et al. : 02-3166

GREEN, et al. : 02-3168

SAKEWICZ, et al. : 02-3169

HENDRICKS, et al. : 02-3170

PALMER, et al. : 02-3171

SOLOMON, et al. : 02-3175

O’DONNELL, et al. : 02-3177

HARTMANN : 02-3448

ROCKS, JR., set al. : 02-3449

REED, III, et al. : 02-3450

GAMBLER, et al. : 02-3451

MACAULEY, et al. : 02-3452

ALIBERT : 02-3630

VISCO, et al. : 02-3631

DANCSECS, et al. : 02-3632

HAMMOND, et al. : 02-3847

POTTER, et al. : 02-3848

SMITH, et al. : 02-4095

SEARFOSS : 02-4096

GEARINGER : 02-4097

FRYE : 02-4101

MEYER, et al. : 02-4339

:

VS. :

:

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, :

INC. :

Case 2:02-cv-04097-CRW Document 4 Filed 08/02/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case or cases are referred to the Honorable

Charles R. Weiner for the purposes of the monitoring and the coordination of the status of

discovery, scheduling of arbitration hearings (if appropriate), settlement negotiations (if

appropriate), and scheduling trial dates (if appropriate), and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case(s) shall remain on the calendar(s) of the

judge(s) to whom they were assigned at the time of filing, until further order of this court,

and, it is further 

ORDERED that counsel for defendant(s) who filed a petition for removal of the

above-captioned case(s) to this court shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for

plaintiff(s) in the above-captioned case(s), and, it is further

ORDERED that the relevant Prothonotaries of the Courts of Common Pleas located

within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania that the above-captioned case or cases have been removed from shall retain the

original records in these matters, pending further Order of this court.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________

JAMES T. GILES, Ch.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04097-CRW Document 4 Filed 08/02/2002 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 13.1f CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amended Annual Report of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gao Ren, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gao RenGao Ren, President and Chairman June 21, 2010
|Exhibit
  32.1
|--------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
      906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
  2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
Chief Executive Officer ofBelairCapital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | theQuarterlyReport of the Fund on Form10-Qfor thequarterendedMarch 31, 2006(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
      results of operations of the Fund for such period.                          
|   



|Date:May 10,
    2006
|---------------------



| | /s/Thomas E.
      Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.