alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 22, 2011





/s/ Paritosh K. ChoksiParitosh K. ChoksiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer ofATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1

      

      
        

        

        EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO

        THE CHF SOLUTIONS, INC.

        NEW-HIRE EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

      

      
        

        

      

      
        The CHF Solutions, Inc. New-Hire Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended in the following respects, effective February 17, 2021, in accordance with Section 2(b)(vi) of the Plan.

      

      
        

        

      

      
        The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following sentence:

      

      
        

        

      

      
        “Subject to the provisions of Section 9 relating to adjustments upon changes in stock, the aggregate number of shares of Common
          Stock that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards after the Effective Date shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 23,919 shares (the “Share
            Reserve”).”
# L_2022192EN.01003001.xml

| 21.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/30

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/892 of 1 April 2022 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 155 of 8 June 2022
  )

On page 12, in Article 10a(4):

for:

‘Annex VI’,

read:

‘Annex VII’.

On page 13, in Article 10b(4):

for:

‘Annex VII’,

read:

‘Annex VIII’.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                                  CDNOW, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                        Year Ended      -----------------------
                                    December 31, 1997      1997        1998
                                    -----------------   ----------  -----------
                                
Net loss                             $ (10,745,405)     $ (544,306) $(9,198,193)

Accretion of preferred stock          
  to redemption value                     (410,103)             -      (115,542)

Net loss applicable to common 
  shareholders                       $ (11,157,508)     $ (544,306) $(9,313,755)
                                    =================   ==========  ===========

Weighted average number of    
  common shares outstanding              7,845,684       7,845,684   12,015,090
                                    =================   ==========  ===========
                          
Net loss per common share            $       (1.42)          (0.07) $     (0.78)
                                    =================   ==========  ============
No. P68/109.

protests 58/6023 and 58/22540 (New York).

#### Lafayette Brass Co., Inc., and Globe Importing Company *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of aerators in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Globe Importing Company*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 248, Abstract 65882), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 20, 2023.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@chi.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *The Orville A. Rehder 2nd Revocable Living Trust, Orville A. Rehder as trustee, Jeffrey A. Rehder, and Steve C. Rehder, all of Hawarden, Iowa;*                     as a group acting in concert to acquire voting shares of First State Associates, Inc., Hawarden, Iowa, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Rivers Edge Bank, Marion, South Dakota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-24340 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**Re:  Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Acceptance Corp. Irwin Whole Loan Home Equity Trust 2005-C Home Equity Loan-Backed Notes, Series 2005-C I, Bruce Kaiserman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Irwin Whole Loan Home Equity Trust 2005-C (the "Trust"); 2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be prepared by the Indenture Trustee based upon the servicing information required to be provided by the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement is included in these reports; 4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement and based upon the review required under the Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed  in the report, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement; and 5. I have disclosed to the Depositor's certified public accountants all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar standard as set forth in the Servicing Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in Appendix A to the Indenture, dated as of August 5, 2005 (the "Indenture"), among the Trust and U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORP. /s/ Bruce Kaiserman   Bruce Kaiserman Vice President March 30, 2006
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. §1350), Greg Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of 31st day of July, 2007.         By: /s/ Greg Hildebrand    Greg Hildebrand         Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofVolterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

ADFlex Mexico, S.A. de C.V., organized under the laws of Mexico

ADFlex Solutions Limited, organized under the laws of the United Kingdom 

ADFlex Solutions FSC Inc., organized under the laws of Barbados 

ADFlex Cayman Limited, organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands 

ADFlex (Thailand) Limited, organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand
No. 50305.

#### Protests 893327-G, etc., of Akawo & Co., Ltd. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that passed upon in *Nippon Import & Trading Co.*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 35, C. D. 908), the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 921 was sustained.
1 

### Stout, Alan

From: Stout, Alan Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:39 PM To: 'Carter, Sarah@ARB' Subject: RE: Cold temp testing



### Sarah, The standards for cold testing aren’t changing, so the Tier 3 transition is not fundamental for them. Allowing for transition through 2021 nevertheless correlates wit h what manufacturers are doing otherwise to update their lab equipment and procedures for meeting Tier 3 standar ds.

Alan

From: Carter, Sarah@ARB [ mailto:scarter@arb.ca.gov ]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Stout, Alan Subject: RE: Cold temp testing

Thanks, Alan. So, there’s no distinction between T ier 2 and Tier 3 vehicles in terms of migration of cold temperature testing to 1066 correct?

Sarah Carter

, M.S.A.E., P.E. Staff Air Pollution Specialist Emissions Compliance, Automotive Regulations and Sc ience Division California Air Resources Board

From: Stout, Alan [ mailto:stout.alan@epa.gov ]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:30 AM
To: Carter, Sarah@ARB Subject: RE: Cold temp testing



### Sarah,
We wanted to build in an immediate transition to th e 1066 procedures for cold testing, but we knew we needed to accommodate carryover and some degree of lead time for updating lab equipment. The general expectatio n is that there are no big changes involved in that migration (other than the test fuel, which we deal with sepa rately). The provision to smooth the overall transition is in §8 6.201(c) as noted below.

Alan

_______________

(c) Through model year 2021, manufacturers may cert ify vehicles based on data collected according to p reviously published cold temperature and intermediate tempera ture testing procedures. In addition, we may appro ve the use of previously published cold temperature and intermedi ate temperature testing procedures for later model years as an alternative procedure under 40 CFR 1066.10(c).

From: Carter, Sarah@ARB [ mailto:scarter@arb.ca.gov ]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:19 PM
To: Stout, Alan Subject: Cold temp testing2 Hi, Alan,

I read §86.201 to mean that all Tier 2 and Tier 3 v ehicles must be tested using part 1066 to demonstra te compliance with cold CO and cold NMHC effective as soon as Tier 3 b ecomes final, unless a manufacturer is using carryo ver data. A manufacturer may continue to certify both Tier 2 an d Tier 3 vehicles using carryover data for cold tem perature testing through MY 2021. Am I understanding this correctly ? Thanks

Sarah Carter

, M.S.A.E., P.E. Staff Air Pollution Specialist Emissions Compliance, Automotive Regulations and Sc ience Division California Air Resources Board
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group Corp.
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, David Wu,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report  complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


February 9, 2006


                                            By:/s/ David Wu
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               David Wu, CEO
# ActiveLicense_4.10.2024

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary/quick-tip.pdfhttps://elibrary.ferc.gov/https://www.ferc.gov/elibrary-quick-help
No. 61200.

protests 123381-K, etc. (New York).

#### Beerfas & Birnbaum and William H. Emig et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was, therefore, sustained.
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer ofBelairCapital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | theQuarterlyReport of the Fund on Form10-Qfor thequarterendedSeptember 30, 2007(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                    
|   



|Date:November 9, 2007
|---------------------



| | /s/Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the First Division,

December 22, 1944

No. 49890.

#### Protests 3900-K, etc., of Frankel Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of beads wholly or in chief value of glass similar to those involved in *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), some of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent *177under the same paragraph as modified by the said trade agreement, and as set out in schedule attached to decision.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1013 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1013

   To require that employers offering benefits to associates of its 
   employees who are not spouses or dependents of the employees not 
discriminate on the basis of the nature of the relationship between the 
                employee and the designated associates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1999

  Mr. Petri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require that employers offering benefits to associates of its 
   employees who are not spouses or dependents of the employees not 
discriminate on the basis of the nature of the relationship between the 
                employee and the designated associates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nondiscrimination in Employee 
Benefits Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS.

    Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
is amended by inserting before the last sentence the following: ``In a 
case in which an employer elects to offer benefits to associates of its 
employees who are not spouses or dependents of the employees, the 
employer shall offer such benefits on a non discriminatory basis 
without regard to the nature of the relationship between the employee 
and the designated associate.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### State of Maine *vs.*Wilmot E. Hussey.

*Criminal law—pleading.*

*An*indictment should charge an offense in the words of the statute or in language equivalent thereto.

Thus ‘unlawfully and maliciously’ throwing down a gate, is not equivalent to ‘wilfully and maliciously’ doing it.

Appleton, C. J.

The R. S. of 1871, c. 127, § 7, provide, among other things, for the punishment of ‘ wilfully and maliciously ’ throwing down a gate.

The allegation in the indictment is that the defendant ‘ did unlawfully and maliciously throw down a certain gate,’ etc.

These words do not describe the statute offense. The indictment should charge the offense in the words-of the statute, or in words equivalent thereto. The statute uses the words ‘ wilfully and maliciously.’ It does not regard them as identical in meaning, as both are used. When the statute makes the doing of an act ‘ wilfully and maliciously ’ criminal, it will not be sufficient in the indictment to charge that it was done ‘ feloniously, unlawfully, and *411wilfully.' *State*v. *Gove,*34 N. H. 511. So, charging an offense to have been committed ‘ feloniously, voluntarily, and maliciously,’ instead of ‘ feloniously, unlawfully, and maliciously,’ is bad. *Rex*v. *Reader,*19 E. C. L., 367. Unlawfully doing a thing is not synonymous with wilfully doing it. A man may do many things wilfully, which are not unlawful, and he may do things unlawfully which are not wilfully done.

*T. B. Reed,*Att’y Gen’l for the State.

*E. F. Webb,*for the defendant.

It was held in *Rex*v. *Davis,*1 Leach, 556, that ‘ unlawfully and maliciously ’ is not equivalent to wilfully and maliciously, and that as ‘ wilfully and maliciously ’ were both mentioned in the statute as descriptive of the offense, both must be stated in the indictment.

*Exceptions sustained.*

Cutting, Kent, Walton, Barrows, and Daneorth, JJ., concurred.

Tapley, J., did not concur.
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                     ----------

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. of our report dated January 25, 2002,
included in the 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders of Penn Engineering &
Manufacturing Corp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
25, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Penn
Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001, in the following
registration statements:

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan Form S-8
     Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-20101);

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
     Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-13073);

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan for
     Non-Employee Directors Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No.
     333-92907);

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan Form
     S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92903); and

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
     Purchase Plan Form S-3 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-73450).



                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2002


<PAGE>