Affirmed; Opinion Filed May 24, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01100

- CR No. 05

- 18

- 01101

- CR No. 05

- 18

- 01102

- CR
LILJUAN RICHARDSON L AWRENCE , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F17

- 29751

- L , F17

- 29752

- L, F17

- 29753

- L



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice C arlyle Appellant Liljuan Richardson Lawrence waived a jury and entered a guilty plea to one
charge of evading arrest or det ention with a motor vehicle and two charges of abandoning a child

without intent to return. The trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to ten years’
imprisonment in each case , to run concurrently

. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 3 86 U.S.

738 (1967) , because it presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect,
there are no arguable grounds to advance. 1 Counsel appears to have delivered a copy of the brief

1 See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).– 2

–

to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not do so

. 2 We

have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. 3 We agree the appeals are frivolous and without

merit , finding nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal s

. We affirm the trial court’s judgment s

.

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47 181100F.U05

2 See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief).

3 See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases).– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LILJUAN RICHARDSON LAWRENCE, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 01100

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17

- 29751

- L. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Myers and Molberg participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered this 24 th day of May, 2019.– 4

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LILJUAN RICHARDSON LAWRENCE, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 01101

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17

- 29752

- L. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Myers and Molberg participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial c ourt is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered this 24 th day of May, 2019.– 5

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LILJUAN RICHARDSON LAWRENCE, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 01102

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17

- 29753

- L. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Myers and Molberg participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered this 24 th day of May, 2019.