alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.

Company Name


Ownership
Interest


Country of
IncorporationNavios Maritime Holdings Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.Navios Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Navios International Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.Navimax Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Navios Handybulk Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.Corporacion Navios SA




100
%


UruguayHestia Shipping Ltd.




100
%


MaltaAnemos Maritime Holdings Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.Navios Shipmanagement Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.NAV Holdings Limited




100
%


MaltaKleimar N.V.




100
%


BelgiumBulkinvest S.A.




100
%


LuxembourgAchilles Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Apollon Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Herakles Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Hios Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Ionian Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Kypros Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Meridian Shipping Enterprises Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.Mercator Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Arc Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Horizon Shipping Enterprises Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Magellan Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Aegean Shipping Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Star Maritime Enterprises Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Hyperion Enterprises Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.Nostos Shipmanagement Corp.




100
%


Marshall Is.Portorosa Marine Corporation




100
%


Marshall Is.Shikhar Ventures S.A




100
%


LiberiaSizzling Ventures Inc.




100
%


LiberiaRheia Associates Co.




100
%


Marshall Is.Taharqa Spirit Corp.




100
%


Marshall Is.Rumer Holding Ltd.




100
%


Marshall Is.Chilali Corp.




100
%


Marshall Is.Pharos Navigation S.A.




100
%


Marshall Is.Orbiter Shipping Corp.




100
%


Marshall Is.White Narcissus Marine S.A.




100
%


PanamaNavios G.P. L.L.C.




100
%


Marshall Is.Navios South American Logistics Inc.




100
%


Marshall Is.


---



List of Affiliates of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.

Company Name


Ownership
Interest


Country of
IncorporationNavios Maritime Partners L.P.




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Navios Maritime Operating L.L.C.




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Libra Shipping Enterprises Corporation




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Alegria Shipping Corporation




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Felicity Shipping Corporation




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Gemini Shipping Corporation




43.2
%


Marshal is.Galaxy Shipping Corporation




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Prosperity Shipping Corporation




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Fantastiks Shipping Corporation




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Aldebaran Shipping Corporation




43.2
%


Marshall Is.Acropolis Chartering & Shipping Inc.




50
%


Liberia


---
Exhibit 3.3



LOGO



OSP 06 99734

State of California

Secretary of State

I, DEBRA BOWEN, Secretary of State of the State of California, hereby certify:

That the attached transcript of 1 page(s) has been compared with the record on file in this office, of which it purports to
be a copy, and that it is full, true and correct.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute this certificate and affix the Great Seal
of the State of California this day of DEC 12 2007

DEBRA BOWEN

Secretary of State

THE GREAT SEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

Sec/state form ce-107(Rev 1/2007)

EUREKA



---

LOGO



STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECRETARY OF STATE

ENDORSED - FILED

IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEC 12 2007

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

A $30.00 FILING FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM.

IMPORTANT  READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM.

1.SECRETARY
OF STATE FILE NUMBER 200729010015

2. NAME OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AAI ACQUISITION LLC

THIS SPACE FOR FILING USE ONLY

3. COMPLETE ONLY THE SECTIONS WHERE INFORMATION IS BEING CHANGED. ADDITIONAL PAGES MAY BE ATTACHED IF NECESSARY.

A. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY NAME (END THE NAME WITH THE WORDS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, LTD. LIABILITY CO. OR THE ABBREVIATIONS LLC OR LLC.)

AMERICAN APPARAL (USA), LLC

B. THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY WILL BE MANAGED BY (CHECK ONE):

þ ONE
MANAGER

 ̈ MORE THAN ONE MANAGER

 ̈ ALL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MEMBER(S)

C. AMENDMENT TO TEXT OF THE ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION:

D. OTHER MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE SET FORTH ON SEPARATE ATTACHED PAGES AND ARE MADE A PART OF THIS CERTIFICATE. OTHER MATTERS MAY INCLUDE A CHANGE IN THE LATEST DATE ON WHICH
THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY IS TO DISSOLVE OR ANY CHANGE IN THE EVENTS THAT WILL CAUSE THE DISSOLUTION.

4. FUTURE
EFFECTIVE DATE, IF ANY: MONTH DAY YEAR

5. NUMBER OF PAGES ATTACHED, IF ANY:

6. IT IS HEREBY DECLARED THAT I AM THE PERSON WHO EXECUTED THIS INSTRUMENT, WHICH EXECUTION IS MY ACT AND DEED.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED PERSON DATE 12/11/07

Jonathan J. Ladecky, President Secretary and Manager

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND
TITLE OF AUTHORIZED PERSON

7. RETURN TO:

NAME American Apparal, Inc.

FIRM Attn: CFO

ADDRESS

CITY/STATE 747 Warehouse Street

ZIP CODE Los Angeles California 90021

THE GREAT SEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

SEC/STATE FORM LLC-2 (REV. 03/2005) -
FILING FEE $30.00

APPROVED BY SECRETARY OF STATE
#### Hannah Shaw *vs.*Aaron W. Nickerson.

*Real estate*— attachment *of.*

No attachment of real estate can he made on a writ containing simply a count for money had and received, without .any specification of the claim to he proved under it.

On facts agreed.

Writ of entry. The only question was the validity of an attachment made on a writ, the declaration in which was simply a count for money had and received, with no specification.

*W. H.*McLellan, for the plaintiff.

*Boyle*Johnson, for the defendant.

Appleton, C. J.

The writ in the suit *Shaw*v. Newhall, contained only a count for money had and received.

Property can be attached only to secure demands in suit. ‘When the writ contains the money counts there may be difficulty,’ observes Shepley, J., in *Fairbanks*v. Stanley, 18 Maine, 302, ‘ in determining what demands were put in suit.’ To make that certain the statute of 1838, c. 344, which is found in the revision of 1857, c. 81, § 31, was enacted. By this section no attachment is valid ‘ unless the plaintiffs demand on which he founds his action, and the nature and amount thereof, are substantially set forth in proper counts or a specification thereof is annexed to the writ.’ If a count sets forth the nature and amount of the plaintiffs demand, so that one may know the ground upon which he claims to recover, that is sufficient. But in the count for money had and received no one can tell upon what ground a recovery is sought. Hence in those cases a specification is required setting forth the nature and amount of the plaintiffs claim. Otherwise, the plain*250tiff might introduce, under the money counts, .subsequently acquired demands. *Saco*v. *Hopkinson,*29 Maine, 268; *Osgood*v. *Holyoke,*48 Maine, 410; *Forbes*v. *Hall,*51 Maine, 568; *Drew*v. *Alfred Bank,*55 Maine, 450. *Plaintiff nonsuit.*

Cutting, Kent, Walton, and Barrows, JJ\, concurred.
### Appeal No. 2019AP251 Cir. Ct. No. 2013CF3214



### STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT I

S TATE OF 

### W ISCONSIN



### ,

P LAINTIFF



### - R ESPONDENT



### ,

V



### .

M ATTHEW 

### R AY 

### T AYLOR



### ,

D EFENDANT



### - A PPELLANT



### . 

### FILED

April 1 , 2021

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals



### ERRATA SHEET

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 1688

Madison, WI 53701

- 1688

Court of Appeals District I

330 East Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 1020

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

- 3161

Court of Appeals District III

2100 Stewart Ave., Suite 310

Wausau, WI 54401

Jenny Andrews

, Sarah Motiff

Court of Appeals

2921 Landmark Place , Suite 415

Madison, WI 537 1 3

- 4248

Court of Appeals District II

2727 N. Grandview Blvd.

Waukesha, WI 53188

- 1672 Court of Appeals District IV

2921 Landmark Place, Suite 415

Madison, WI 537 1 3

- 4248

Hon. Stephanie Rothstein

Criminal Justice Facility

949 N. 9th St.

Milwaukee, WI 53233

John Barrett

Clerk of Circuit Court

Room 114

821 W. State Street

Milwaukee, WI 53233

James Eric Goldschmidt

Quarles & Brady LLP

411 E. Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 2400

Milwaukee, WI 53202No. 2019AP251

2 Elizabeth A. Lo ngo

Deputy District Attorney

821 W. State St.

Milwaukee, WI 53233

Robert Probst

Assistant Attorney General

P.O. Box 7857

Madison, WI 53707

- 7857 Patrick Proctor

- Brown

Quarles & Brady LLP

411 E. Wisconsin Ave., #2350

Milwaukee, WI 53202

- 4426



### PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to pa ges one

through nineteen in the above

- captioned opinion which was released on February 2,

2021 . A corrected electronic version in its entirety is available on the court 's website

at www.wicourts.govNo. 2019AP251

3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51202 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERARDO ANTONIO FLORES-DE LA CRUZ, also known as Jose Delaluz Zubia, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(EP-00-CR-798-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________ September 20, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Gerardo Antonio Flores-De La Cruz a/k/a Jose Delaluz Zubia has requested leave to withdraw as counsel
and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Flores-De La Cruz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED , coun sel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

:

JAMES MARIO PRIDGEN, : 

Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 00-4561

:

SHANNON :

and :

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE :

COUNTY OF LANCASTER :

and :

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE :

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA : 

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2013, upon consideration of pro se petitioner’s 

60(b) Motion Alleging That the Federal Courts Misapplied the Federal Statute of Limitations Set 

Out in § 2244(d) (Document No. 53, filed October 11, 2012), Respondent District Attorney of 

Lancaster County’s Answer to Petitioner’s [sic] for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 56, 

filed December 10, 2012), and Petitioner’s Response to Respondent’s Answer to Petitioner’s for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 57, filed December 20, 2012), for the reasons set forth in 

the Memorandum dated March 21, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that pro se petitioner’s 60(b) 

Motion Alleging That the Federal Courts Misapplied the Federal Statute of Limitations Set Out 

in § 2244(d) is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois

______________________________

JAN E. DUBOIS, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                             TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS COMPANY
                                   AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                           
                          CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except earnings per share)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                            For the                 For the 
                                                     Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                                      February 28 and 29,        February 28 and 29,    
                                                    ----------------------- -----------------------
                                                      1997        1996          1997     1996
                                                      -----      -----         -----    -----
                                                        (unaudited)              (unaudited)

<S>                                                 <C>         <C>         <C>         <C> 
Net income per statements of income                  $3,993     $   768       $9,864     $1,966

   Earnings resulting from modified treasury
     stock method                                        --          61          --         194
                                                     ------     -------       ------      -----
                                                       
Net earnings per modified treasury 
   stock method                                      $3,933     $   829       $9,864     $2,160
                                                     ------     -------       ------     ------
                                                     ------     -------       ------     ------

Shares:
   Weighted average shares outstanding               15,822      13,969       15,474     13,712
   Common stock equivalents                           2,072       2,408        2,104      2,311
                                                     ------     -------      -------     ------

   Total                                             17,894      16,377       17,578     16,023
                                                     ------      ------       ------     ------
                                                     ------      ------       ------     ------

Earnings per share                                  $  0.22     $  0.05      $  0.56    $  0.12
                                                    -------     -------      -------    -------
                                                    -------     -------      -------    -------

</TABLE>
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 23, 1957

No. 61225.

protests 226931-K, etc.

#### Union Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Protests abandoned August 13, 1957. (Not published.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of D.R. and C.R., Children

No. 06-21-00019-CV

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

20C0411-102). Opinion delivered by 

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 5, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Brian M.  Sondey,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                            |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date: March 9, 2007

|  | /s/ Brian M.  Sondey                               Brian M.  SondeyPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
No. 62871.

#### Express Forwarding & Storage Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/3098 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of blown rabbit hair similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 61281, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EDWARDO CHAPALET,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4327

Opinion filed October 7, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Edwardo Chapalet, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 57886.

protest 211096-K (New York).

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co. and Omni International Corp. *v.*United States,

*417Opinion by

Oliveb, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cut filaments of vinylon, a synthetic textile fiber, not exceeding 30 inches in length, which is not waste; that said filaments of vinylon are not made from cellulose, a cellulose hydrate, a compound of cellulose, or a mixture containing any of the foregoing; that vinylon did not enter the trade and commerce of the United States until about 1951; and to that extent the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Holeproof Hosiery Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 1366). In C. D. 1366, spun nylon yarn was held dutiable at 6% cents per pound and 22% percent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1303, as modified by T. D. 51802, for “Spun yarn of rayon or other synthetic textile.” Accepting the stipulation as a statement of fact, the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1302, as modified, *supra,*was sustained.
No. 59422.

protests 179445-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### G. L. Ramsey a/c The Juvenile Mfg. Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of embroidered cotton wearing apparel similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Ramsey a/c Juvenile Mfg. Co.*(42 C. C. P. A. 106, C. A. D. 580), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 23

                     CONSENT OF BEARD MILLER COMPANY L.L.P.
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(on form S-3 and Form S-8) of Juniata Valley Financial Corp. of our report dated
January 18, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. incorporated by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                          BEARD MILLER COMPANY L.L.P.


Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 20, 2002


<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                         And Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


      I Philip Pilevsky, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer
of Philips International Realty Corp. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003
of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                             By:  /s/ Philip Pilevsky
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Philip Pilevsky
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  principal financial officer

May 15, 2003


--------------
*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Philips International Realty Corp. and will be retained by Philips
International Realty Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Transitional Report of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended July 9, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Huang Xianfang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Huang XianfangHuang Xianfang, Chief Financial Officer July 10, 2008