alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 783 

Expressing support for designation of September as ‘‘National Brain 

Aneurysm Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2018 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself and Mr. JOYCE of Ohio) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of September as 

‘‘National Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas an unruptured brain aneurysm can lead to double 

vision, vision loss, loss of sensation, weakness, loss of balance, uncoordination, and speech problems; 

Whereas a brain aneurysm is often discovered when it ruptures and causes a subarachnoid hemorrhage; 

Whereas a subarachnoid hemorrhage can lead to brain damage, hydrocephalus, stroke, and death; 

Whereas each year, more than 30,000 people in the United 

States suffer from ruptured brain aneurysms and 40 percent of these people die as a result; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 783 IH 

Whereas annually, between 3,000 and 4,500 people in the 

United States with ruptured brain aneurysms die before 

reaching the hospital; 

Whereas a number of advancements have been made in recent years regarding the detection of aneurysms, including the computerized tomography (CT) scan, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test, and the cerebral 

arteriogram, and early detection can save lives; 

Whereas various research studies are currently being conducted in the United States in order to better understand, prevent, and treat brain aneurysms; 

Whereas organizations, such as the Brain Aneurysm Foundation, serve as global leaders for brain aneurysm awareness, education, support, advocacy, and research funding; 

and 

Whereas the month of September would be an appropriate 

month to designate as ‘‘National Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month’’; and 

4 (2) continues to support research to prevent, 

5 detect, and treat brain aneurysms. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)
  (a)
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 2, 2009
    /s/ Mark M. JacobsMark M. JacobsPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Rick J. DobsonRick J. DobsonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas G Toland, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.  /s/ Thomas G TolandThomas G TolandChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)April 4, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 









SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 20-F/A




|  |                                                                                                         
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|o | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR
    (g) OF THE SECURITIES 
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR




|  |                                                                                           
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE 
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



OR




|  |                                                                                                   
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
    SECURITIES 
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR




|  |                                                                                                      
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|o | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
    SECURITIES 
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





Telenor ASA


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Norway


(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)


Snarøyveien 30, N-1331 Fornebu, Norway


(Address of principal executive offices)





















þ o




o þ




þ o




o þ




þ


12b-2


o þ










---



##### 








---



##### 



ITEM 19: EXHIBITS
  (13)
    
    Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley-Act of 2002.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE


20-F




| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | Telenor ASA 
     (Registrant)



| |     |                     
| | --- | --------------------
| | By: | /s/ Trond Ø. Westlie



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Trond Ø. Westlie       
| | Chief Financial Officer
No. 53926.

#### Coast Chemical Co. *v.*United States,

protest 144166-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon v. United States (35*C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378) and Abstract 52712, The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>


                         HOME LOAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
(the "Report"), I, Robert C. Hamilton, the President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.  The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Corporation.




                                            /s/ Robert C. Hamilton
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert C. Hamilton, President

                                            Date:  February 7, 2003


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             29.
No. 49911.

#### Protest 993954—G of Ciba Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

A written stipulation showed that the “Sapamine FL pat.” contains only 51 percent of materials provided for in said section 701 and that the “Albatex PO pat.” contains no merchandise covered by any of the provisions of the internal revenue laws. In accordance therewith the “Sapamine FL pat.” was held subject to a tax of 3 cents per pound under said section 701 to the extent that the weight by quantity of the taxable material (51 percent) bears to the total weight of the imported product. It was also held that the so-called “Albatex PQ pat.” is not subject to internal revenue tax. Protest sustained to this extent.
July 24, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KENNETH WAYNE WASHINGTON, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00779-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
Before the Second Division,

September 11, 1946

No. 51287.

#### Protests 912346-G, etc., of Fred Haslam & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion b'y

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the catheters and other articles are similar in all material respects to the merchandise passed upon in *Bard*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 134). In accordance therewith the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1121 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1121

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 18 Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, as the ``Lewis R. Morgan 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1999

 Mr. Collins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 18 Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, as the ``Lewis R. Morgan 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 18 
Greenville Street in Newnan, Georgia, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Lewis R. Morgan Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Lewis R. Morgan Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial
Officer18 U.S.C. Section
1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (President)
and the
Principal Financial Officer (President) of Sword Comp-Soft Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof: (a)
The Annual Report on Form 10-K SB of the Company for the
year ended
  November 30, 2005, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
  13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 4, 2006 /s/ Louis GrecoLouis GrecoPresident(Principal Executive and Financial
Officer) This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
(b) (6)



(b) (6)

(b) (6)
No. 60717.

#### Camarge Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 279797-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2303. ROHAN DAVIS v. JOHN GREEN et al.

John Green and Xinrong Green (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) originally filed

this action in magistrate court, seeking unpaid rent and possession of the premises.

The action was subsequently transferred to state court after Rohan Davis (the

“Defendant”) filed a counterclaim for constructive eviction seeking damages in

excess of the jurisdictional limit of magistrate court. On March 22, 2019, the state

court granted the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their claims, as well as

against the Defendant’s counterclaim. The Defendant filed the instant appeal on April

19, 2019. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order

sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The underlying subject matter of an

appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate

procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The

underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. Under OCGA § 44-7-56,

appeals in dispossessory actions must be filed within seven days of the date the

judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523

(521 SE2d 456) (1999). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an

absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Id. at 523. Here, the

Defendant’s notice of appeal is untimely, as it was filed 28 days after entry of the

judgment to be appealed.

July 16, 2019
Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/16/2019
No. 53436.

protests 123304-K/722 and 123557-K/750 (Chicago).

#### Judson-Sheldon Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to the sawed dagame lumber the subject of *John A. Hunter Hardwood Corp.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 139, C. D. 1143). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 23.1

January 10, 2011


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the incorporation and use in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K ) of Metro One Development, Inc. of our audit report, dated
January 6, 2011, relating to the accompanying audited financial statements
(and related statements included there in) as of July 31, 2010 which appears
in the Annual Report.



De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC

/s/ De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC
Henderson, NV
January 10, 2011



<PAGE>
#### Bates, Appellant, *v.*Kick et ux.

*Judgments*— Opening *judgments*— Discretion *of court.*

An application to open a judgment, entered upon a warrant of attorney, is addressed to the discretion of the court and is to be disposed of according to equitable principles. The judge to whom the application is made acts as a chancellor and, on an appeal from his decree, an appellate court will only inquire whether or not his discretion has been rightfully exercised.

Where there is contradictory evidence and more than oath against oath, it is for the judge to determine in whose favor the scale turns. Where there is no proof of abuse of discretion the decision of the lower court will be affirmed.

Argued April 30, 1924.

Appeal, No. 130, April T., 1924, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1923, No. 85, making absolute rule to open judgment in the case of I. F. Bates v. F. Kick and Adele E. Kick.

Before Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Rule to open judgment. Before Carnahan, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

The court made absolute the rule. Plaintiff appealed.

*274
      *Error assigned*was the order of the court.

*Francis A. Wolf,*and with him *Osear G. Meyer,*for appellant.

*Ben Paul Brasley,*and with him *M. Mandelbaum,*for appellees.

July 2, 1924:

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This is an appeal from a decree opening a judgment on an allegation of fraud on the part of the plaintiff. Application to open a judgment entered on a warrant of attorney is addressed to the discretion of the court and is to be disposed of according to equitable principles. The judge to whom the application is made acts as a chancellor and on an appeal from his decree we are only required to inquire whether his discretion has been rightfully exercised. Where there is contradictory evidence and more than oath against oath, it is for the judge to determine in whose favor the scale turns. The case as disclosed by the evidence, seems to be one proper for the consideration of a jury and the decree of the court is therefore affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  March 2, 2009
    /s/ Mark M. JacobsMark M. JacobsPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Name of Applicant]  Docket No. QF  -

Notice of Self-Certification of Qualifying Status

of a Cogeneration Facility

(                     )

Take notice that on [date filed], [Name and Address of Applicant] filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a notice of self-certification [or self-recertification] of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to 18 C.F.R § 292.207(a) of the Commission's regulations. 

[Description of facility.  This description must include: (A) a statement indicating that such facility is a cogeneration facility; (B) the primary energy source used or to be used by the facility; (C) the power production equipment and capacity of the facility; and (D) the location of the facility.] 

[Names of the electric utilities with which the facility expects to interconnect, transmit or sell electric energy to, or purchase supplementary, standby, back-up and maintenance power (if known).] 

A notice of self-certification [or self-recertification] does not institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status; a notice of self-certification [or self-recertification] provides notice that the entity making filing has determined the Facility meets the applicable criteria to be a qualifying facility.  Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 292.207(d) (1)(iii), with the appropriate filing fee.****

This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.  There is an “eSubscription” link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).  For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free).  For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

� See Hydro Investors, Inc. v. Trafalgar Power Inc., 94 FERC ¶ 61,207, reh’g denied, 95 FERC ¶ 61,120 (2001).
Before the Second Division,

March 12, 1953

No. 57143.

protest 162725-K (New York).

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of foils and foil blades similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Castello Fencing Equipment Co., Inc.,*and *Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 72, C. D. 1447), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.