alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.34    
    


 
 

REVOLVING NOTE    




	$9,000,000	 	August 19, 2003

Minneapolis, Minnesota





        FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, LECG, LLC, a California limited liability company, hereby promises to pay to the order of U.S. Bank National Association (the "Bank") at the main office of
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in lawful money of the United States of America in Immediately Available Funds (as such term and each other capitalized term used
herein are defined in the Credit Agreement hereinafter referred to) on the Revolving Commitment Ending Date the principal amount of NINE MILLION DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($9,000,000.00) or, if less, the
aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Revolving Loans made by the Bank under the Credit Agreement, and to pay interest (computed on the basis of actual days elapsed and a year of 360 days)
in like funds on the unpaid principal amount hereof from time to time outstanding at the rates and times set forth in the Credit Agreement. 


        This
note is one of the Revolving Notes referred to in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2003 (as the same may hereafter be from time to time
amended, restated or otherwise modified, the "Credit Agreement") among the undersigned, the Bank and the other banks named therein. This note is secured, it is subject to certain mandatory prepayments
and its maturity is subject to acceleration, in each case upon the terms provided in said Credit Agreement. 



        In
the event of default hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees. The undersigned waives demand, presentment,
notice of nonpayment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor. 


        This
Note replaces and supersedes, and evidences indebtedness formerly evidenced by, (i) a promissory note of the undersigned in favor of U.S. Bank National Association dated as
of March 31, 2003 in the principal amount of $6,000,000. 


        THE
VALIDITY, CONSTRUCTION AND ENFORCEABILITY OF THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES
THEREOF, BUT GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS. 



	 
	 	 
	 	 

	 	 	LECG, LLC
	

 	
 	

By	
 	

/s/  JOHN C. BURKE      

	 	 	Title	 	CFO












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.34


REVOLVING NOTE
Before the Second Division,

February 2, 1948

No. 52153.

petition 6538-R (Providence).

#### Lloyd Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The record disclosed that the petitioner, through its broker,. entered a shipment of certain flax and cotton card cloth at the price shown on the face of the invoice, and the importation was appraised as entered. The broker had overlooked the fact that attached to the invoice was a memorandum indicating a higher market value, which memorandum also had not been noticed by the appraiser. Subsequently, the broker discovered the error and called it to the attention of the appraiser who recommended that a collector’s appeal for reappraisement be taken. On appeal for reappraisement by the Government, the court found the proper value of the merchandise to be the value based upon the unit price shown on the memorandum attached to the invoice. From the evidence presented the court held that entry of the merchandise at a less value than that returned upon final appraisement was through inadvertence and was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition ivas therefore granted.
H. J. Res. 73

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–62 is further amended by striking ‘‘October 29, 1999’’ in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘November 5, 1999’’, and by striking

‘‘$189,524,382’’ in section 119 and inserting ‘‘$288,903,248’’. Public

Law 106–46 is amended by striking ‘‘November 1, 1999’’ and

inserting ‘‘November 5, 1999’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133305 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133306 

Marilyn Kelly 133307 Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

JAMES TAYLOR, as Personal

Representative of the Estate of

Afradita Taylor, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133305-133307 

 COA: 262763, 262771, 262777 

Oakland CC: 03-053470-NH 

RAMALINGESWARA YALAMANCHI,

M.D., R. R. YALAMANCHI, M.D., P.C.,

PANKAJ K. VIJ, M.D., DAVID M.

MONTGOMERY, M.D., MITUL K. PATEL, 

M.D., GRAHAM W. LONG, M.D., and

WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of May 30, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Mullins v 

St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of the Court, the case having been 

decided on November 28, 2007, ___ Mich ___ (2007), the application is again considered 

and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the 

judgment of the Court of Appeals, REINSTATE the order of the Oakland Circuit Court 

denying defendants' motion for summary disposition, and REMAND this case to the 

Oakland Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and the order in 

Mullins. 

l1211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 14, 2007 

Clerk
| 1.  | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.       | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                |        |                                                 |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                                 |   |
| March      31, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Guy      Nissenson                          |   |
|                |   | Guy      Nissenson                                   |   |
|                |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |
|                |   |                                                 |   |
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: March 2, 2009
    /s/ Rick J. DobsonRick J. DobsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 58873.

protest 182717-K (San Francisco).

#### R. Vannucci Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
*This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case,

res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders ;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 9, 2006

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGORY D. COSBY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-1550

(D. Ct. No. 05-CR-491-WYD)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, HARTZ, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The

case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court denying Defendant-Appellant

Gregory Cosby’s motion to modify his sentence or, in the alternative, to be placed in half-
- 2 -

way house or a Community Corrections Center. Mr. Cobsy appeals pro se, seeking to

have this Court order the District Court to hold a hearing on issues related to his

placement within the Bureau of Prisons. Neither this Court nor the District Court,

however, have power to dictate placements to the Bureau of Prisons. Congress has given

the Bureau of Prisons broad authority to determine the place of a prisoner’s confinement. 

See 18 U.S.C. 3621(b). Moreover, Mr. Cosby has not alleged any constitutional violation

or other wrongdoing by the Bureau of Prisons that could be construed as actionable

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to consider this claim

on appeal. Furthermore, to the extent Mr. Cosby argues that the District Court erred in

failing to modify his sentence, a district court has no jurisdiction to modify a sentence

once it has been imposed, except in very narrow circumstances not present here. See

United States v. Price, 438 F.3d 1005, 1007 (10th Cir. 2006); 18 U.S.C. 3582(c); Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the District Court denying Mr. Cosby’s

pro se appeal, and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Chief Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Notice of Public Meeting of the District of Columbia Advisory 
Committee; Correction

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice; Revision to registration links and telephone access 
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the 
Federal Register on Monday, June 5, 2023, concerning meetings of the 
District of Columbia Advisory Committee. The registration links and 
telephone access information for the upcoming meetings have been 
updated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivy Davis, Director of Eastern 
Regional Office and Designated Federal Officer, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6b3a4b996a3a5b5b5a4f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b1a6bb94a1a7b7b7a6fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a> or 1-
202-539-8468.
    Correction: In the Federal Register on Monday, June 5, 2023, in FR 
Document Number 2023-11829, on page 36527, second column, correct the 
registration links and telephone access information as follows:
    <bullet> Meeting on Tuesday, November 21, 2023: http://bit.ly/46S4uyX; Telephone Access (Audio Only): 1-833-435-1820, Webinar ID: 160 
065 4861#.
    <bullet> Meeting on Tuesday, December 19, 2023: https://bit.ly/3QlnqiE; Telephone Access (Audio Only): 1-833-435-1820, Webinar ID: 161 
082 8553#.

    Dated: October 31, 2023.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2023-24362 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| Name                                                                    |         | Jurisdiction of Formation |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|---------------------------|
|                                                                    |         |                      |
| Alfredo Holdings, Ltd.                                                  |         | Cayman Islands            |
|                                                                    |         |                      |
| Li3 Energy Peru SRL                                                     |         | Peru                      |
|                                                                    |         |                      |
| Minera Li Energy SPA                                                    |         | Chile                     |
|                                                                    |         |                      |
| Noto Energy S.A.                                                        |         | Argentina                 |
|                                                                    |         |                      |
| Pacific Road Mining Chile, SA                                           |         | Chile                     |
|                                                                    |         |                      |
| Sociedades Legales Mineras Litio 1 a 6 de la Sierra Hoyada de Maricunga |    | Chile                     |

----
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registration
Statement No. 333-91927 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account
Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated February 19, 2003 of Hartford Life
Insurance Company relating to the financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and of our report dated February 21,
2003 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account Seven relating to
the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002,
appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such
Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings
"Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
III

Calendar No. 687

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 319

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 18, 2000

Received and placed on the calendar

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the 10th anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence from

the rule of the former Soviet Union.

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible

incorporation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and

Lithuania into the former Soviet Union;

Whereas the declaration on May 4, 1990, of the reestablishment of full sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Latvia furthered the disintegration of the former

Soviet Union;
2

HCON 319 PCS

Whereas Latvia since then has successfully built democracy,

passed legislation on human and minority rights that

conform to European and international norms, ensured

the rule of law, developed a free market economy, and

consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free and democratic nations by seeking membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

(NATO); and

Whereas Latvia, as a result of the progress of its political

and economic reforms, has made, and continues to make,

a significant contribution toward the maintenance of

international peace and stability by, among other actions,

its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in

Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates Latvia on the occasion of the

4 10th anniversary of the reestablishment of its inde5 pendence and the role it played in the disintegration

6 of the former Soviet Union; and

7 (2) commends Latvia for its success in imple8 menting political and economic reforms, which may

9 further speed the process of that country’s integra10 tion into European and Western institutions.

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 687

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 319

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the 10th

anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former SovietUnion.

JULY 18, 2000

Received and placed on the calendar
No. 57571.

#### Artgift Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 185446-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal statuettes (Infant of Prague) with glass domes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57135, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7909** 

COREY E. JOHNSON , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. M. VARGO, Warden, Sussex 2 Prison , Respondent

– Appellee , and
UNKNOWN , Respondent
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00608

- JRS )

Submitted : February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Corey E. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Corey E. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and denying reconsideration . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by d emonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or
wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the distric t court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We ha ve independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becaus e the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Naugle’s Estate

(No. 2).

Argued October 23, 1923.

Appeal, No. 81, April T., 1924, by Marjorie Gillespie, from decree of O. C. Lawrence County, Sept. T., 1918, No. 38, making distribution of money in the hands of George W. Naugle and Clyde Y. Ailey, Executors of the Estate of Isaphena P. Naugle, deceased.

Before Orlady, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

February 29, 1924:

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an appeal from the same decree and presents only the same questions which have been considered in the opinion this day filed in the appeal of John C. Naugle, and for the reasons there stated the assignments of error are overruled.
No. 67689.

#### Caribe Gloves, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

pretests 58/1585, etc. (New York).

*291Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves and mittens similar in use to cotton gloves and mittens and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Sternberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark Jarvis, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)         
 the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation.

Dated: June 27, 2011



/s/ MARKJARVISMark Jarvis President and Chief Executive Officer, Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hard Creek
Nickel Corporation and will be retained by Hard Creek Nickel Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---