alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.4****ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT**     **WHIPPLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a South Carolina corporation**(hereinafter referred to as“Assignor”), for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and NO/l00 ($10.00) Dollars, and other goodand valuable considerations to it paid by **EBANK MORTGAGE, LLC**, a Georgia limited liability company(hereinafter referred to as “Assignee”), the receipt and sufficiency of which are herebyacknowledged, has ASSIGNED, SOLD and TRANSFERRED, and by these presents does ASSIGN, SELL andTRANSFER, unto Assignee, without any warranty whatsoever, expressed or implied, all of thefollowing:     Any and all of Assignor’s interests in and to the tenant lease by and between 2401 Lake ParkDrive Associates, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership whose sole general partner is 2401 Lake ParkDrive Holding Corp., a Georgia corporation (as “Landlord”) and Whipple Development Corporation (as“Tenant”) dated June 1, 1998, as amended by First Amendment to Lease between the parties, datedSeptember 25, 2001 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Lease”), which Lease is for 2,430rentable square feet of office space located on the 2nd floor of Park Centre OfficeBuilding at 2401 Lake Park Drive, Smyrna, Georgia 30080-8812 (hereinafter referred to as the“Property”). A copy of the entire Lease is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.     As a part of the consideration to Assignor for the assignment, transfer and sale of the Lease,Assignee, by its acceptance hereof, hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of theresponsibilities and obligations of the landlord or lessor under the Lease arising and accruingunder said Lease from and after the date of this instrument. Assignee hereby agrees to defend,indemnify and hold Assignor harmless from and against any breach, violation or non-performance onthe part of Assignee of any covenants or conditions of the Lease arising or accruing from and afterthe date hereof.     This Assignment and Assumption of Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit ofAssignor and Assignee and their respective successors and assigns.     Executed under seal, this the 19th day of April, 2006      **ASSIGNOR**
Before the First Division,

January 25, 1946

No. 50845.

#### Protests 120329-K, etc., of Allied Purchasing Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

HYDRO CONDUIT CORP., a foreign corporation,

Appellant,

v.

DRAGADOS USA, INC., a foreign corporation, FIDELITY & DEPOSIT 

COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a foreign corporation, ZURICH AMERICAN 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, LIBERTY MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, and THE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, a foreign corporation,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-289

[February 13, 2020]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos Augusto Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 11-18330CA.

Mark C. De St. Aubin (Pro Hac Vice) and Peter M. Crofton of Smith, 

Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Atlanta, GA, and John P. Seiler and Richard J. 

Zaden of Seiler, Sautter, Zaden, Rimes & Wahlbrink, Wilton Manors, for 

appellant.

K. Stefan Chin and Jerry P. Brodsky of Peckar & Abramson, P.C., 

Miami, for appellee Dragados USA, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit  10.4

                               MANAGEMENT CONTRACT

BETWEEN:

          Crown  International  Inc.              ("Crown")
     And
          Macwin  Investments  Inc.               ("Macwin")

     The parties agree as follows:

l.   From  the  1st  day  of  April,  2003 Macwin agrees to provide to Crown the
     following services: - services of at least three people, each proficient as
     follows  and  for  monthly  compensation  noted
               (a)  one person in General Management                 $10,000
               (b)  one person in Marketing                          $10,000
               (c)  one person for Professional Services       $5,000
     -    provide the capital and/or services or equipment or expenses necessary
          for the development of Crown's services, products and business models
          and their commercial applications;
     -    provide full and complete accounts and records for Crown;
     -    oversee Development Crown's services and products;
     -    develop relationships with industry participants to further and
          promote Crown's services and products;
     -    source, explore and develop Commercial Applications and
          commercialization of Crown's products and services;
     -    to assist with the sales and marketing of Crown's services and
          products and to assist with the development of Crown's business
          models;
     -    assist Crown in its efforts to list and trade it stock

2.   No  more  than  once  in  each and every year after the date hereof, Macwin
     shall  present  to Crown an invoice for its services as aforesaid and Crown
     agrees  to  pay  or provide forthwith to Macwin the value of such services.

3.   This contract may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice
     delivered  to  the  other  at  its  usual  place  of  Business.

DATED at Toronto this 1st day of April, 2003.

CROWN INTERNATIONAL INC.                MACWIN INVESTMENTS INC.

By: /s/ Alan Irwin                      By: /s/ Lorna Irwin
------------------------                ----------------------
Alan Irwin                              Lorna Irwin
Director / Chief Operating Person       President


<PAGE>
No. 59435.

protests 239310-K and 239311-K (New York).

#### Mitteldorfer Straus, Inc. *v.*United States,

*303Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s returns as to the protests were received in evidence, and counsel for the Government stated that said mem-oranda indicated that error was made with respect to certain items, recommending that allowances by made accordingly. On the record presented, item 06953 in protest 239310-K and items 06954 and 07233 in protest 239311-K were held properly dutiable at 10 cents per dózen pieces and 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 211, as modified, *supra,*and item 06415 in protest 239311-K was held properly dutiable at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 20 percent ad valorem under said modified paragraph, as 10-inch plates.
# L_2022220EN.01000301.xml

| 25.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 220/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 220/3

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1159 of 11 March 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for public disclosure of investment policy by investment firms

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 179 of 6 July 2022
  )

On page 15, in Annex I, the following two tables are inserted after table IF IP1 – TEMPLATE ON PROPORTION OF VOTING RIGHTS and before table IF IP 2.03 – TABLE ON EXPLANATION OF THE VOTES:

‘
  IF IP2 – VOTING BEHAVIOUR

IF IP2.01 – TABLE ON THE DESCRIPTION OF VOTING BEHAVIOUR

| Row | Item | Value |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Number of relevant companies in the scope of disclosure | |
| 2 | Number of general meetings in the scope of disclosure during the past year | |
| 3 | Number of general meetings in the scope of disclosure in which the firm has voted during the past year | |
| 4 | Does the investment firm inform the company of negative votes prior to the general meeting? | |
| 5 | Proportion of in-person votes used by the firm | |
| 6 | Proportion of votes by mail or electronic vote used by the firm | |
| 7 | On a consolidated basis, does the investment firm group possess a policy regarding conflicts of interests between relevant entities of the group? | |
| 8 | If yes, summary of this policy | |

Row

Item

Value

1

Number of relevant companies in the scope of disclosure

2

Number of general meetings in the scope of disclosure during the past year

3

Number of general meetings in the scope of disclosure in which the firm has voted during the past year

4

Does the investment firm inform the company of negative votes prior to the general meeting?

5

Proportion of in-person votes used by the firm

6

Proportion of votes by mail or electronic vote used by the firm

7

On a consolidated basis, does the investment firm group possess a policy regarding conflicts of interests between relevant entities of the group?

8

If yes, summary of this policy

IF IP2.02 – TEMPLATE ON VOTING BEHAVIOUR

| Row | Item | Number | Percentage |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | General meetings resolutions: | | |
| 2 | the firm has approved | | |
| 3 | the firm has opposed | | |
| 4 | in which the firm has abstained | | |
| 5 | General meetings in which the firm has opposed at least one resolution’ | | |

Row

Item

Number

Percentage

1

General meetings resolutions:

2

the firm has approved

3

the firm has opposed

4

in which the firm has abstained

5

General meetings in which the firm has opposed at least one resolution’

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. SIDNEY MARTIN, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 273 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 24th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Sandra L. Thompson – Director

Federal Housing Finance Agency

The Honorable Sandra L. Thompson was nominated by 

President Joseph R. Biden to serve as the Director of the 

Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and was sworn in on 

June 22, 2022.

Thompson has over 40 years of private and public sector 

finance experience, with expertise in supervision, consumer 

protection, risk management, and consumer outreach. Prior to 

leading the agency, Thompson served as Deputy Director of the 

Division of Housing Mission and Goals (DHMG) since March 

2013, overseeing FHFA’s housing and regulatory policy, capital 

policy, fair lending, and mission-critical activities for the 

regulated government-sponsored entities of Fannie Mae, 

Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks. 

Before joining FHFA, Thompson worked at the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for more than 23 years in a 

variety of leadership positions, including as Director of the 

Division of Risk Management Supervision.

Thompson is a graduate of Howard University in Washington, 

D.C.

Date updated: July 18, 2023
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-31148

Summary Calendar

 

JESSERENE DINGER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1858

--------------------

September 16, 1999

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesserene Dinger appeals from the judgment affirming the

denial of her applications for Social Security disability and

supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. Dinger argues that

the Commissioner’s decision was not supported by substantial

evidence. Dinger did not raise this contention before the

Appeals Council; therefore, she did not exhaust administrative

remedies as to this issue. We find no reason to waive the

exhaustion requirement in Dinger’s case. Consequently, we lack 
No. 98-31148

-2-

jurisdiction over Dinger’s appeal. Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208,

210 (5th Cir. 1994); see Giannakos v. M/V BRAVO TRADER, 762 F.2d

1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1985) (court must observe lack of

subject-matter jurisdiction sua sponte). 

 APPEAL DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARTITA TOGBA, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff :

:

 vs. : NO. 03-4892

:

 :

HOLCOMB BEHAVIORAL HEALTH :

SYSTEM, :

:

:

Defendant :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of December, 2003, it having

been reported that the issues between the parties in the above

action have been settled and pursuant to the provisions of Rule

41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice,

pursuant to the agreement of counsel, without costs. 

BY THE COURT:

 

J. CURTIS JOYNER, J. 

Case 2:03-cv-04892-JCJ Document 4 Filed 12/17/03 Page 1 of 1
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3095

_____________________________
R OBERTO B AILEY P EREZ ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction. Adrian G. Soud , Judge

. June 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED . See Williams v. State , 202 So. 3d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

W ETHERELL , M AKAR , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb
, Assistant Public Defende r, Jacksonville, for Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent

.
No. 61232.

protests 104846-K, etc. (New York).

#### William H. Emig et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. O. *Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was, therefore, sustained.
No. 64743.

#### Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 105740-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

*329Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams*& *Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 51894.

#### James E. Fox & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 57822-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, P. J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the articles the subject of *Rolls Razor, Inc.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480) and Abstract 51306. In accordance therewith the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

d1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

141456 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141456 

 COA: 291621 

Kent CC: 08-007939-FC 

ALEXANDER JEVONTE ABRON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23.01

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 Nos. 333-15369 and 333-52794), pertaining to the Amended and Restated
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 2000 Stock Option Plan, respectively,
of Convera Corporation (Form S-3 No. 333-34705), pertaining to the Prospectus of
Convera Corporation for the registration of 2,000,000 shares of its common stock
(Form S-4 No. 333-51072), pertaining to the Prospectus of Convera Corporation
for the registration of 45,231,390 shares of its common stock, of our report
dated March 12, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Convera Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year
ended January 31, 2004.

                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


McLean, Virginia
June 7, 2004
No. 60689.

#### Gramercy Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 260510-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-KSB/A for Fund.com Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit
(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Fund.com Inc. does hereby certify,
pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
August 21, 2008


/s/
Michael Hlavsa


Michael
Hlavsa


Chief
Financial Officer
No. 57598.

#### Lone Star Company *v.*United States,

protest 175022-K (Galveston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found (“1 case short landed”), were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as not found, i. e., “1 case short landed.” The protest was sustained to this extent.
Document

Exhibit 10.80

December 31, 2017
CHUBB INA HOLDINGS INC.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT 
IN LIEU OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE 
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


The undersigned, by virtue of authority conferred in the September 12, 2011 Unanimous Consent Resolution of the Board of Directors of Chubb INA Holdings Inc., hereby consents and agrees to the following:
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE PENSION EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN OF THE CHUBB CORPORATION
WHEREAS, Chubb INA Holdings Inc. (the “Corporation”) maintains the Pension Excess Benefit Plan of the The Chubb Corporation (the “Plan”); and
    WHEREAS, the Corporation reserved the right to amend the Plan under Section 8.1 thereof; and
    WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to modify the manner in which the Specified Employee is determined under Section 1.27.
    NOW THEREFORE, RESOLVED that by virtue and exercise of the amending power reserved to the Corporation under the Plan, the Plan shall be and hereby is, amended:
1.Effective December 31, 2016, the first paragraph of Section 1.27 is hereby amended to read:
1.27    Specified Employee
“Specified Employee” means an Employee who is a Key Employee as defined in Code Section 416(i) without regard to Code Section 416(i)(5) thereof as of the Specified Employee Determination Date. The Specified Employee Determination Date shall be December 31 of each year. The determination that an employee is a Key Employee as of Specified Determination Date shall make such employee a Specified Employee for the 12-month period commencing as of the January 15 next following the Specified Employee Determination Date.
IN WHITENESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused these presents to the executed on the day and year first written above.
                        CHUBB INA HOLDINGS, INC.


                        By: _____________________________
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belair Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

     (a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
          September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  the  results  of
          operations of the Fund for such period.


Dated:  November 14, 2002


                                                    /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
No. 56934.

#### Allied Food Corp. of America and Reciprocal Trade Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 130409-K and 130404-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shredded or grated coconut meat, cooked in sugar sirup and packed in tins, a product of Cuba, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Allied Food Corporation of America*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 222, C. D. 1412), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.