alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Christopher
A. Milner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James J. Lillis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Christopher A. Milner
|Name:                     |  | Christopher A. Milner  
|Title:                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                     |  | November 9, 2009       
|                         
|/s/ James J. Lillis      
|Name:                     |  | James J. Lillis        
|Title:                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                     |  | November 9, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
                 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                 EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30, 2000 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
                 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                 SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         14,447
<SECURITIES>                                1,222,780
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,261,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         990,517
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                      315,532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    73,192
<OTHER-SE>                                   (118,048)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,261,257
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               42,625
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             22,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,659
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,659
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.61


</TABLE>
No. 60389.

protest 237903-K (New York).

#### Kung Chen Fur Corp. and Cohen *&*Mann *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion, in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 50320.

#### Protests 57743-K, etc., of Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 53880.

#### D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 146487-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

When this case was called for hearing there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. An examination of the official record disclosing nothing to disturb the decision of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 854

_____________________________
I SAAC B ROWN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 22, 2020

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

L EWIS , N ORDBY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Isaac Brown, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 71 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 71

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 1, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 41) providing for 
congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a 
rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to 
``Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers''. All points of order 
against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint 
resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; 
and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 40) providing for congressional 
disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 
submitted by the Social Security Administration relating to Implementation of 
the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007. All points of order against 
consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint 
resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary or 
their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit  10.3

                              MANAGEMENT CONTRACT

BETWEEN:
                Crown  International  Inc.                   ("Crown")
           And
                Macwin  Investments  Inc.                    ("Macwin")

          The  parties  agree  as  follows:

1.  From  the  1st  day  of  April  2001  Macwin  agrees  to  provide  to  Crown
the  following  services:

-  services of at least three people, each proficient as follows and for monthly
compensation  noted

         (a)  one  person  in  General  Management         $  10,000
         (b)  one  person  in  Marketing                   $  10,000
         (c)  one  person  for  Professional  Services     $   5,000

-    provide the capital and/or services or equipment or expenses necessary for
     the development of Crown's technology and it's commercial applications
-    provide full and complete accounts and records for Crown
-    oversee Development of Technology
-    develop relationships with software developers to assist with Crown's
     technology and its applications
-    source, explore and develop Commercial Applications and commercialization
     of Crown's technology
-    ensure that Crown's technology is developed with commercially viable
     functions, capabilities and compatibilities
-    coordinate and direct and obtain facilities and personnel necessary for the
     Research and Development of Crown's technology and its commercial
     applications
-    assist Crown in its effort to list and trade its stock

2.   No more than once in each and every year after the date hereof, Macwin
     shall present to Crown an invoice for its services as aforesaid and Crown
     agrees to pay or provide forthwith to Macwin the value of such services.


3.   This contract may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice
     delivered to the other at its usual place of Business.


DATED at Toronto this 1st day of April 2001.



CROWN  INTERNATIONAL INC.                                MACWIN INVESTMENTS INC.

By:  /s/  Alan  Irwin                                    By:  /s/  Lorna  Irwin
------------------------                                 ----------------------
Alan  Irwin                                              Lorna  Irwin
Director / Chief Operating Person                        President


<PAGE>
[J-94-2019] [MO: Saylor, C.J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JASMINE WEEKS, VANESSA WILLIAMS, 

ARNELL HOWARD, PATRICIA SHALLICK, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL 

OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Appellants

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OF 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 22 EAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court entered on 

August 1, 2019 at No. 409 MD 2019.

ARGUED: October 16, 2019

CONCURRING OPINION

JUSTICE TODD DECIDED: December 18, 2019

I join the Majority Opinion. In my view, whether the passage of Act 12 violated the 

“original purpose” or “single subject” mandates in Article III, §§ 1 and 3 of the 

Pennsylvania Constitution is a close question. At the preliminary stage of this litigation, 

however, this Court is not asked to decide this ultimate constitutional question, but only 

to determine whether the Commonwealth Court had “any apparently reasonable grounds” 

to support its denial of preliminary injunctive relief. See Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. Shoe 

Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., 828 A.2d 995, 1000 (Pa. 2003). As such, for the reasons 

expressed by Chief Justice Saylor in his Majority Opinion, I agree that the Commonwealth 

Court did not abuse its discretion in concluding Appellants did not carry their burden to 

establish a likelihood of success on the merits. I nevertheless withhold judgment on the 
[J-94-2019] [MO: Saylor, C.J.] - 2

underlying constitutional question. Cf. Washington v. Dep’t of Public Welfare, 188 A.3d 

1135 (Pa. 2018) (in process challenge to legislation allegedly enacted in violation of 

Article III, § 4 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, this Court, although initially affirming

denial of request for preliminary injunction, ultimately found legislation to be

unconstitutional).

Justices Donohue and Dougherty join this opinion.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 30, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00509

- CR

Elizabeth Ann MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9024B

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s third request for an extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED.

Appellant’s brief is due on or before April 22, 2020

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Case No. 8,942.

#### MAGEE v. CALLAN et al.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 251.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1832.

Bail — Civil Action — Joint and Separate — Bail for One — Affidavit.

1. Upon attachment of the goods and effects of both and each of two joint debtors, bail must tie given for both, to release the joint and separate effects.

2. Bail will not be received for one only to discharge his separate goods.

3. The court will not. upon affidavit, decide whether the effects attached are the joint or several property of the defendants.

This was an action at law by Peter Magee against James Callan and Andrew Clements.]

Attachment on warrant, under the Maryland act of 1795, c. 50, of the joint and separate effects of the defendants, for a joint debt; laid in the hands of the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Company as garnishees.

Mr. Marbury, for Clements,

one of the defendants, offered bail and an appearance for him, to discharge his separate effects.

C. Cox demanded bail for both defendants;

for bail for one would discharge the joint as well as separate property attached.

THE COURT

(MORSELL, Circuit Judge, contra, or at least doubting,)

refused to permit one of the defendants to appear and give bail, unless bail and appearance be entered for both. The joint effects are attached to compel the appearance of both; and ought not to be given up without the appearance of both; and the defendants cannot be permitted to appear without good bail.

On the next day, Mr. Marbury offered an ex parte affidavit of Mr. J. P. Ingle, the clerk of the canal company, that the company' had no joint effects of the defendants in their hands, but had the separate effects of each; and moved again to appear and give bail for Clements alone, so as to discharge his separate effects, and contended that he had a right, in this manner, to show that no joint effects were attached; and that, in an attachment against a partner for his separate debt, his share or interest in the joint effects may be attached. Campbell v. Morris, 3 Har. & McH. 553, and Wallace v. Patterson, 2 Har. & McH. 463.

THE COURT, however (MORSELL. Circuit Judge, absent), said that the affidavit of Mr. Ingle could not be received as sufficient evidence to the court, in this stage of the cause, that the effects in the hands of the canal company are not joint effects. The plaintiff had a right to have that question tried, either upon interrogatories, or by a jury', upon the issue of nulla bona; and this court could not, in this manner, deprive him of that right.

Bail was then given for both, and the attachment dissolved.
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dinesh Maniar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Dinesh Maniar
----------------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 10, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief
Financial Officer of Belair Capital Fund LLC (the Fund),
that based on her knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of
      operations of the Fund for such period.                                                   
|   



|Date: August 9,
2006
|--------------------



| | /s/ Michelle A. GreenMichelle A.
      GreenChief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 66677.

#### B. Shackman & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/22290, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Old Timer’s Sets” similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66106, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.01

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Montgomery Realty Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dinesh Maniar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Dinesh Maniar
--------------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

October 21, 1955

No. 59371.

protests 202082-K, 228135-K, and 251920-K (New York).

#### Fred M. Reineman Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Intrepid Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maurice Stone,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March
      30,
      20007






/s/
      Maurice Stone


Maurice
      Stone


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Principal
      Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4596

_____________________________

RANDY ALLEN CHESSER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

January 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Randy Allen Chesser, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Respondent.
No. 49908.

#### Protests 69288-K, etc., of Chekiang Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Olives, P. J.

At the trial the Government chemist testified on behalf of the plaintiffs that he had analyzed samples of said merchandise and found them to be composed entirely of synthetic phenolic resin. In view thereof and following Abstract 49595 the claim under paragraph 1558 was sustained to this extent.
No. 53376.

protest 74075-K (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.