alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20219 

Telephone: (202) 649-3800 

Facsimile: (202) 649-1071 

www.fhfa.gov 

FHLBank System at 100 Roundtable: 

Supporting Native American Communities

December 8, 2022 | 3:00 – 5:00 p.m. ET

1. What role does the FHLBank System play in supporting affordable, equitable, sustainable, 

and resilient housing for Native Americans? 

2. What role does the FHLBank System play in supporting community development and 

economic development for Native Americans? 

3. What factors prevent the FHLBanks from playing a larger role? 

4. Are any of those factors specific to working on tribal land? If so, how can they be mitigated 

to better support Native American communities?

5. Are there particular needs that the FHLBanks may be uniquely positioned to address? 

6. What should the FHLBanks’ mission-related programs look like? If we could start from a 

blank slate, what would be key features? 

To submit in advance: 

• What is the single most important unmet need that a federal housing or community 

development program could help to address? 

• If you could design a federal housing or community development program from scratch, 

what would be the key features? 

• Other bullet points outlining the points you would like to discuss
EXHIBIT 23.1

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 401 East Las Olas
Blvd. Suite 1800 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone (954) 764 7111 Facsimile (954) 525 4453


Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants

To World Omni Financial Corp.:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of World Omni Financial Corp. (the Company) as of December 31, 2005 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated February 13, 2006.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Company failed to comply with the terms, covenants,
provisions, or conditions of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated August 25, 2005 (the Agreement) between World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2005-B (the Issuer), World Omni Auto Receivables LLC (the Seller),
and World Omni Financial Corp. (the Servicer) insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

This report is being provided pursuant to Section 4.11 of the Agreement, and is intended solely for the information and use of the board of
directors and management of the Issuer, the Servicer, and the Seller and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
|February 13, 2006
(Reap. Dec. 10283)

Entry No. 2851.

#### Gitkin Co. *v.*United States

(Decided June 27, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn ton:*the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows :

> 1. That the merchandise and the issues involved in the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as those involved in *342
>       *Unites States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 2. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after February 27, 1958 and is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

> 3. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold for exportation to the United States to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values, less the amounts marked “X” in red ink by the Examiner.

> 4. That the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values are the appraised values, less the amounts marked “X” in red ink by the examiner.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit  31.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I,  Russell  C.  Mello,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The GSI Group, Inc.;

2.  Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a  material  fact  necessary to make the
statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant and have:

a)  designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluations;  and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting  that  occurred  during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that  has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting;  and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):

a)  all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting.


Date:  November  8,  2004

                                        /s/  Russell  C.  Mello
                                        -----------------------
                                         Chief  Executive  Officer
No. 58856.

protests 195376-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alfred Orlik, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), for “Works of art * * * statuary, sculptures, or copies, replicas, or reproductions thereof, valued at not less than $2.50.”
No. 60383.

petition 7208-R, (New York).

#### H. S. Dorf *&*Co., Inc., a/c Joseph H. Meyer Bros. *v.*United States,

Donlon, Judge:

This is a petition for remission of additional duties assessed under section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 on merchandise entered March 28, 1947. There was prolonged litigation in connection with appraisement of the merchandise, and the collector did not complete liquidation until September 28, 1955. This petition was timely filed within 60 days after liquidation.

Petitioner has the burden, as in all section 489 cases, of affirmatively showing that “the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that returned upon final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise.” (Section 489, Tariff Act of 1930.)

In our opinion, petitioner has made the necessary showing by evidence introduced on trial. In addition to the clear-cut declarations of intent usual in such cases, the evidence here introduced reveals a transaction that was complicated by shipping difficulties and merchandise shortages during the period immediately following World War II.

These goods were never intended for importation into the United States, but came through en route from Prance to destination in Mexico, because direct water shipment from Europe to Mexico was unavailable in 1947. The merchandise before us was part of a larger shipment. This part lay on dock in Mexico, because delivery was refused. It did not enter into the commerce of Mexico, except in the technical sense that it lay there on dock awaiting disposition. Petitioner tried to stop return of the merchandise from Mexico to New York, but failed to intercept shipment. The consular invoice stayed in Mexico, and entry here was necessarily made on a *pro forma*invoice, in the absence of the consular invoice.

After prolonged litigation in the reappraisement proceeding, our appeals' court held that, the merhandise was dutiable, as appraised. *(H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc., a/c Joseph II. Meyer Bros.*v. *United States,*41 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 548.) Appraisement was on the basis of constructive cost of production in Mexico. The additional duties under section 489 were assessed on the difference between the constructive cost of production in Mexico and export value in France.

Counsel for the Government stated, on trial, that the examiner of this merchandise understands that he was supplied with all facts that were available; that it was a question of which value should be taken, French or Mexican; and the appeals court finally ruled for the Mexican value (p. 10).

Counsel for the Government added:

I feel satisfied that all the information that was available was submitted to the customs officials (p. 10).

Judgment for petitioner.
No. 59386.

protests 182212-K, etc. (New York).

#### Marvin Accessories, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 64007.

protests 185702-K, etc. (Pittsburgh).

#### Jos. S. Finch & Co. *v.*United States,

*403Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
January 9, 1951

No. 55112.

Suit 4642.

#### J. J. Gavin *&*Co., Inc. (Salomon & Phillips) *v.*United States.

affirmed October 31, 1950. C. A. D. 441.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Patricia Gallup, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Patricia Gallup               
|                   |  |  |  | Patricia Gallup                      
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit99(B)

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATIONANNUALCOMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE SALE ANDSERVICING AGREEMENT

I, Paul Honda, do hereby certify that Iam the Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and ComplianceOfficer of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation(the ‘‘Company’’), and further certify onbehalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the‘‘Servicer’’) under the Sale and ServicingAgreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’) dated as ofAugust  1,  2005 among the Servicer, American HondaReceivables Corp., as Seller and Honda Auto Receivables 2005-4 OwnerTrust as follows:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (i)  | A review of theactivities of the Servicer during the 7-month period ended March 31,2006, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; |

|  |            |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii)  | To the best of myknowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout suchperiod; and |

|  |             |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (iii)  | To the best of myknowledge and information, no event of default nor any event which withthe giving of notice or lapse of time, or both, would become an eventof default under the Agreement, has occurred or iscontinuing. |

This certificate is being delivered to the Trusteepursuant to Section 3.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effectiveAugust  1,  2005, which terms and conditions areincorporated in the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hand this 26th day of May,2006

/s/ Paul C.Honda                                        PaulC. HondaAssistant Vice President,Assistant SecretaryandCompliance Officer

----
Exhibit 99.1

                               THE GSI GROUP, INC.
                             1004 E. Illinois Street
                           Assumption, Illinois  62510



May  2,  2003

Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
450  Fifth  Street,  N.W.
Washington,  D.C.  20549

Re:     Certification  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   1350,
     as  enacted  by  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:
     In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March  28,  2003 of The GSI Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as
enacted  by  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:
1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and
2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


     /s/  Craig  Sloan
Craig  Sloan
Chief  Executive  Officer



     /s/  Russell  C.  Mello
Russell  C.  Mello
Chief  Financial  Officer,
Secretary  and  Treasurer
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Adam
Kablanian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Adam A. Kablanian

Adam A. Kablanian
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
No. 49905.

#### Protest 976819-G of Bailey, Green & Elger, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

On the record presented and an examination of the samples in evidence the merchandise was held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed. *United States*v. *Bailey*(30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237) followed.
EXHIBIT 23.3  [Bond & Pecaro, Inc. letterhead]   October 21, 2010 VIA E-MAIL:  evanm@salem.cc  Mr. Evan D. Masyr Vice President of Accounting and Corporate Controller Salem Communications Corp. 4880 Santa Rosa Road #300 Camarillo, CA  93012  Dear Mr. Masyr:  Bond & Pecaro, Inc. hereby grants permission to Salem Communications Corp. to use the Bond & Pecaro, Inc. name and data from our work product as of September 30, 2010 in public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  I hope that this letter is responsive to your needs at this time.  Please do not hesitate to let us know if you need anything additional.  Sincerely,     /s/ Timothy S. Pecaro  Timothy S. Pecaro  cc. Jim Brown
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00344

- CV

Sharon JOHNSON

, Appellant

v.

Samuel B. VILLARREAL

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015EM504204

Honorable Nick Catoe Jr.

, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for failure

to pay the filing fee. Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED Sep tember 16, 2020.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
White Electronic Designs Corporation and Subsidiary (formerly Bowmar Instrument
Corporation) of Forms S-8 (File nos. 33-57230, 33 33-9776, 33-62247 and
333-18463) & Form S-4 (File # 333-56565) of our report dated November 6, 1998,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Electronic Designs,
Inc., as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the
period ended September 30, 1998, which report is included in this Form 8-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
January 8, 1999
No. 64695.

#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/4268 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shrimp shells similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Border Brokerage Co.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 231, C.D. 2132), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of
OpenTable, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ MATTHEW ROBERTS Matthew Roberts Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date: March 9, 2011


This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of OpenTable, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
Under Construction Nuclear Calculation (See NEEDSv.5.13 for capacity and online year source)

State Plant Capacity (MW) Generation (MWh)

GA Vogtle 2200 17,344,800
SC Summer 2200 17,344,800

TN Watts Bar 1122 8,845,848

Generation values are used as the "under construction" nuclear generation values in the state goal calculation for these three states. These values are added to the "at risk" generation identified in Table 4.10 of the GHG Abatement Measures TSD. The sum of the two values is shown in Step 4a of the Appendix 1 and 2 in the Goal Computations TSD where it is factored in the state goal calculation.Generation values are used as the "under construction" nuclear generation values in the state goal calculation for these three states. These values are added to the "at risk" generation identified in Table 4.10 of the GHG Abatement Measures TSD. The sum of the two values is shown in Step 4a of the Appendix 1 and 2 in the Goal Computations TSD where it is factored in the state goal calculation.