alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,249,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,731,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                    52,000
<INVENTORY>                                    578,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,521,080
<PP&E>                                       1,435,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                 710,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,218,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,505,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,750
<COMMON>                                        86,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,798,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,218,406
<SALES>                                     18,407,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,407,603
<CGS>                                       15,146,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,146,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,210,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (923,097)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (324,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (599,097)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (599,097)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10284)

Entry No. 3816.

#### Gitkin Co. *v.*United States

(Decided June 27, 1962)

*Barnes, RicharSson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation reading as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise and the issues involved in the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Unites States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited ease may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 2. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> *3433. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less the amounts indicated on the entry papers as having been added back on entry; and that at the said time of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers for home consumption in the country of exportation.

> 4. That the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values are the appraised values, less the amounts indicated on the entry papers as having been added back on entry.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") of BUCS Financial Corp (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Herbert J.
Moltzan,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Matthew J. Ford,  Chief
Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 27, 2004


/s/Herbert J. Moltzan                               /s/Matthew J. Ford
-------------------------------------               ----------------------------
Herbert J. Moltzan                                  Matthew J. Ford
President and Chief Executive Officer               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;



(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital  Fund, L.P.



|       |                                                         
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------
|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation               
|       | General Partner                                         
|       |                                                         
|       |                                                         
|By:    | /S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                    
|       |                                                         
|Name:  | Brenda G. Gujral                                        
|Title: | President of the General Partner and                    
|       | principal executive officer of InLand Capital  Fund, L.P
|Date:  | May 11, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1104 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1104

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative 
jurisdiction over land within the boundaries of the Home of Franklin D. 
Roosevelt National Historic Site to the Archivist of the United States 
               for the construction of a visitor center.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1104

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative 
jurisdiction over land within the boundaries of the Home of Franklin D. 
Roosevelt National Historic Site to the Archivist of the United States 
               for the construction of a visitor center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VISITOR CENTER FOR HOME OF FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT NATIONAL 
              HISTORIC SITE, HYDE PARK, NEW YORK.

    (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--The Secretary of the 
Interior may transfer to the Archivist of the United States 
administrative jurisdiction over land located in the Home of Franklin 
D. Roosevelt National Historic Site, for use by the Archivist for the 
construction of a visitor center facility to jointly serve the Home of 
Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site and the Franklin D. 
Roosevelt Presidential Library, located in Hyde Park, New York.
    (b) Conditions of Transfer.--
            (1) Protection of historic site.--The transfer authorized 
        in subsection (a) shall be subject to an agreement between the 
        Secretary and the Archivist that shall include such provisions 
        for the protection of the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt 
        National Historic Site and the joint use of the facility to be 
        constructed as the Secretary and the Archivist may consider 
        necessary.
            (2) Consideration.--A transfer made pursuant to subsection 
        (a) shall be made without consideration or reimbursement.
            (3) Termination.--If use by the Archivist of the land 
        referred to in subsection (a) is terminated by the Archivist at 
        any time, administrative jurisdiction over the land shall 
        automatically revert to the Department of the Interior.
    (c) Description of Land.--The land referred to in subsection (a) 
shall consist of not more than 1 acre of land as may be mutually agreed 
to by the Secretary and the Archivist and more particularly described 
in the agreement required under subsection (b)(1).

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 689 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 689

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any 
  infrastructure legislation that provides Federal funds to wireless 
  broadband providers to promote wireless broadband deployment should 
 prioritize funds for wireless broadband providers in States that have 
        enacted streamlined siting requirements for small cells.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2018

 Mr. Hudson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any 
  infrastructure legislation that provides Federal funds to wireless 
  broadband providers to promote wireless broadband deployment should 
 prioritize funds for wireless broadband providers in States that have 
        enacted streamlined siting requirements for small cells.

Whereas wireless broadband brings extraordinary opportunities for economic 
        growth and investment across every sector of the economy;
Whereas wireless broadband is in the midst of a revolution to fifth generation 
        technology that will bring about speeds estimated anywhere from 10 to 
        100 times faster than existing LTE wireless technology;
Whereas the development and deployment of fifth generation wireless broadband 
        will increase efficiencies for virtually every industry and economic 
        sector of the United States economy;
Whereas the broader economic benefits of fifth generation wireless broadband may 
        include 2.2 million jobs and add roughly $420 billion in gross domestic 
        product;
Whereas the United States is competing with other countries and regions around 
        the world to deploy fifth generation wireless broadband first to reap 
        the greatest economic gains from this technology;
Whereas cost estimates to deploy fifth generation technology across the United 
        States exceed $300 billion;
Whereas current siting regulations were designed for traditional large towers 
        used by previous generations of technology, while fifth generation 
        wireless technology will be enabled by a densified network of small 
        cells; and
Whereas roughly a dozen States have already enacted legislation to streamline 
        small cell siting regulations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
any infrastructure legislation that provides Federal funds to wireless 
broadband providers to promote wireless broadband deployment should 
prioritize funds for wireless broadband providers in States that have 
enacted streamlined siting requirements for small cells.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**          I, Wayne W. Byers, certify that:          1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of ebank Financial Services, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;          4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;          5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:May 31, 2006         By:       /s/ Wayne W. Byers    Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                       375
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,054
<PP&E>                                          42,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,004
<BONDS>                                          9,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,341
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,136
<SALES>                                          9,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,714
<CGS>                                            6,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,021
<INCOME-TAX>                                       795
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
No. 61226.

protest 234426-K.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

Protest abandoned August 13, 1957. (Not published.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04-17-00735-CR & 04-17-00736-CR

Porucha Denise PHILLIPS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2016CR9222A, 2016CR9223A

Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, these appeals are DISMISSED. 

SIGNED January 24, 2018.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
# 		Sorry, something went wrong

An unexpected error has occurred.Web Parts Maintenance Page: If you have permission, you can use this page to temporarily close Web Parts or remove personal settings. For more information, contact your site administrator.

Technical Details

Troubleshoot issues with Microsoft SharePoint Foundation.

Correlation ID: 3ba523a1-84cb-a055-6128-06660b7b0520

Date and Time: 4/29/2024 12:39:48 AM

----

Go back to site
EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Shell Company Report of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A as of July 9, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gao Ren, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gao RenGao Ren, President and Chairman July 14, 2009
No. 53908.

#### Koons, Wilson & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 146565-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Prom an examination of the papers, it was found that the evidence was not sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Henryk Dabrowski, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alternet Systems Inc.
      for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Alternet Systems Inc..                                                              

Dated: April 14, 2009

| | /s/
      Henryk Dabrowski   
| | -----------------------------
| | Henryk Dabrowski             
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Alternet Systems Inc.        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alternet Systems
Inc. and will be retained by Alternet Systems Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ebank Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/  Wayne W. ByersWayne W. ByersChief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Salem Communications Corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge: · the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  · the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: May 9, 2011By: /s/ EDWARD G. ATSINGER IIIEdward G. Atsinger IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer