alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


         Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) August 5, 1999


                       NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


                                     Nevada
                 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)


          000-22855                                      86-0671974
  (Commission File Number)                 (IRS Employer Identification No.)


2940 W. Willetta Street, Phoenix, Arizona                   85009
(Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (602) 352-1165


                                      N/A
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>   2
ITEM 5.  RESIGNATION OF REGISTRANT'S OFFICER

         On August 1, 1999, Mr. Donald A. Metke tendered his resignation from
the Registrant from his positions of President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Chief Financial Officer due to semi-retirement. Mr. Metke remains a director on
the Board of Directors of Registrant. Mr. Metke will act as a consultant to the
Registrant from August 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 to ease the transition
to new management, as well as a consultant from January 1, 2000 through December
31, 2003 on a more limited basis. The Registrant is repurchasing all shares of
common stock of the Registrant owned by Mr. Metke from Mr. Metke on an
installment basis. The Board has named Mr. Sean Lee, a director of the
Registrant, to replace Mr. Metke. A copy of Mr. Metke's letter of resignation is
included herewith.
<PAGE>   3
           SIGNATURES

           Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: August 5, 1999             NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.



                                  /s/ Sean F. Lee
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  By: Sean F. Lee
                                  Its: President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                  Chief Financial Officer, and Director
<PAGE>   4
                 [NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING INC. LETTERHEAD]




Effective August 1, 1999, in conjunction with the Separation Agreement, I am
resigning from all officer positions held with New Directions Manufacturing,
Inc., including President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer.



                                    /s/ Donald A. Metke
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Donald A. Metke
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael T. Viadero, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Alternet
      Systems Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Alternet Systems Inc..                                                                

Dated: October 2, 2012

| | /s/MichaelT.Viadero                       
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Michael T. Viadero                        
| | Secretary, Treasurer,                     
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
| | Accounting Officer)                       
| | Alternet Systems Inc.                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alternet Systems
Inc. and will be retained by Alternet Systems Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 59408.

protest 229073-K (New York).

#### John Remeny, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63493.

protest 59/2087 (New York).

#### Spex Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance witb rule 5(b) of tbe rules of tbis court, as amended, tbe protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Peter Bolton, Chief Executive Officer of Rolling Thunder Exploration Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 30, 2006





/s/ Peter Bolton

Peter Bolton, Chief Executive Officer













#
No. 52164.

protest 133350-K (New York).

#### U. S. Commercial Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was. unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
SERVED NOVEMBER 10, 2010 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

• CKET OPERATIONS 

zOlO NOV ! 0 P 1- 3 0 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AVIATION SPECIALTIES UNLIMITED 

FAA DOCKET No. CP09NM0014 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA 2009-1041 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Complaint of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") was filed on November 6, 2009. Respondent Aviation Specialties 

Unlimited (hereinafter "Respondent") on October 22, 2009 had filed a Request for 

Hearing. 

On November 5, 2010, Respondent, by facsimile motion dated October 31, 2010, 

withdrew its Request for Hearing, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At £iny time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 
V 

'•4 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09NM0014 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Richard A. Johnson, Respondent's Counsel 

3815 Rickenbacker Street, Suite 208 

Boise, ID 83705 

TEL: 208-344-1384 

FAX: 208-343-5121 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Moimtain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period  ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank Crivello , Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section     1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities     Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section     1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
 
 
 Date:   November 16, 2011
By:
/s/   Frank CrivelloFrank Crivello

President

(Principal Executive Officer)
Before the Third Division,

April 3, 1961

No. 65379.

#### H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/19276 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the official papers were received in evidence and the case was submitted. An examination of the record showing that the issues are the same as those involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10287)

Entry No. 6613, etc.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 27, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties, reading as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed J.P.D. (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner J. P. Dwyer (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the above-entitled appeals.

> 2. That as so limited, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for exportation to the United States to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, such prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less the amounts of the items on the invoices marked “B” in green ink by the Examiner.

> 3. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after February 27, 1958, and is not identified in the *346Final List published by tbe Secretary of tbe Treasury pursuant to tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

> 4. That tbe appeals enumerated in tbe attached Schedule “A” may be submitted on this stipulation, tbe same being limited to tbe merchandise and tbe issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On tbe agreed facts, I find, as to tbe items of merchandise marked and initialed by tbe examiner on the invoices as above described, that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for tbe determination of tbe values of tbe air mattresses involved and that such values are the appraised values, less tbe amounts of tbe items on tbe invoices marked “B” in green ink by the examiner.

Having been abandoned in all other respects, tbe said appeals for reappraisement are, as to all other merchandise, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris E. Perkins, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Per-Se Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information
contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            By: /s/ CHRIS E. PERKINS
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Chris E. Perkins
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 4, 2005
No. 67739.

#### B & K Instruments, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/4100, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 67085, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Speciman Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.3 
  

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 APRIL 26, 1996 
  

	NUMBER	 	SHARES

  
 NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.

  

	50,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK	 	2,000,000 SHARES PREFERRED STOCK
	$.001 PAR VALUE EACH	 	$.001 PAR VALUE EACH

  
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                                          IS THE
REGISTERED HOLDER OF                  Shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC. 
  
 Transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
  
 In Witness
Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed 
  
 this        day of
                         A.D.         . 
  

	  

	  	[SEAL]	 	  


	SECRETARY	  	 	 	CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

  
 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS
CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED OR QUALIFIED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”) OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE. THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN ACQUIRED WITH A VIEW TO DISTRIBUTION OR RESALE, AND MAY NOT BE
SOLD, EXCHANGED, MORTGAGED, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT (A) AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR SUCH SECURITIES UNDER THE ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE LAWS OR TO THE EXTENT THAT REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION IS NOT
REQUIRED UNDER SUCH ACT OR UNDER APPLICABLE STATE LAWS OR (B) PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION THEREFROM UNDER SAID ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES OR “BLUE SKY” LAWS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE COMPANY MAY, UPON REQUEST, REQUIRE A
SATISFACTORY OPINION OF COUNSEL FOR THE PURCHASER THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT. 
  
 REFER TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, BYLAWS AND AGREEMENTS ON FILE WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION FOR FURTHER RESTRICTIONS. THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE
ALSO SUBJECT TO A REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MARCH 12, 2003. COPIES OF SUCH AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE WITH AND MAY BE INSPECTED AT THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION. THE HOLDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE, BY ACCEPTANCE OF IT,
AGREES TO BE BOUND BY THE PROVISIONS OF SUCH AGREEMENTS.
No, 51895.

#### C. S. Emery & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 6110-K, etc. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of polymerized vinyl acetate film similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 51693. In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Chemours RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

2015DEC28 Pfi 3:25 

CBIC Control Number 

367374 

The Chemours Company 

Fluoroproducts 

67 Canal Road, P. 0. Box 9001 

Chambers Works- Pedersen Building 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

December 16,2015 Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested 

7015 0640 0005 6395 9947 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

RE: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003- 0012 

RECEI'JEO 

JAl-11. .t 21\\o 

EPA oocKE'T cEN'TER 

Chemours Chambers Worl•s NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

November 2015 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

Attached please find summaries ofPFOA analytical results for the Chemours 

Chambers Works weekly grab samples talcen at internal outfall DSN662A in 

November 2015. 

In accordance with the cunent site NJPDES petmit (NJ00051 00, effective September 

2011 ), these t'esults are provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic 

discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic 

copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. 

NJDEP asked The Chemours Company FC, LLC to analyze for and report monthly 

Spot 662 PFNA concentrations for 12 months. The fifth of therequested 12 samples 

is reported in the attach d table. 

S rthey 

Site Environmental Manager 

Chemours Chambers Works 

Enclosures 
Copy to: 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ms. Heather Genievich (cover letter only) 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Surface Water Permitting 

Mail Code 401-02B 

40 I E. State Street 

P.O. Box 420 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 

7015 0640 0005 6395 9954 

7015 0640 0005 6395 9961 
Analyte 

PFOA 

PFNA 

Sample ID 

Date 

Top (ft) 

Total (T)I Bottom (ft) 

units Diss. (D) Duplicate# 

·ug/L T 

ug/L T 

I 

Summary of Analytical Results 

662 - November 2015 

662-GRAB 662-GRABi 662-GRAB 662-GRAB! 662-GRAB 

11/2115 1119115 11116115 11123115 11130115 

0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 o: 0 

1 1 1 1 1 

3.40 2.60 2.23' 2.75 2.44 

NA NA 0.178 NA NA 

PFNA = Perfluorononanoic Acid 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid 

ug/L = micrograms per Liter . 

ug/L =micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) 

LOQ = limit of quantification - 0.100 ug/L 

NA = not analyzed 

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 11/16/15. 

Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported results for 

the sample collected on 11/16/15 represent the average of lab 

duplicate results. 

I I I ' 

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. 

I 

I 

! 

i 

< and NO = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 

---

--

Copy of cwk 662 grab results_nov15.xls:Sheet1 

1211612015 9:18AM
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10173 Summary Calendar

__________________ GARY FRANCIS COURTNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus J. HAVARD, Parole Officer, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-MC-4-C

- - - - - - - - - - (April 21, 1995) Before JONES, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gary Francis Courtney seeks to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal from the district court's denial of his application to obtain pauper status to proceed with his civil rights action. Liberally construed, Courtney argues that the district court based its decision on erroneous information concerning his economic status. The denial of IFP status is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See Flowers v. Turbine Support Division , 507 F.2dNo. 95-10173 -2-
1242, 1243-44 (5th Cir. 1975). Whether a party may proceed IFP in the district court is based solely upon economic criteria. Watson v. Ault , 525 F.2d 886, 891 (5th Cir. 1976). Poverty sufficient to qualify does not require absolute destitution. Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. , 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). Courtney presented credible evidence that the inmate trust fund officer erroneously reported that the total deposits made to his account in the 90-day period preceding his application was $472.74. The evidence showed that Courtney had total deposits of $55 in September, October, and November of 1994 and a balance in his account of $28.46. The determination that Courtney did not meet the economic criteria because he had deposits of $472.74 was an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, Courtney has presented a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). IT IS ORDERED that his motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. See Clark v. Williams , 693 F.2d 381, 381-82 (5th Cir. 1982). Among the alternatives available to the district court is the imposition of a partial payment of the filing fee. See Green v. Estelle , 649 F.2d 298, 301-02 (5th Cir. 1981).