alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 417/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 417 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6423 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 417

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6423 November 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2034 of 10 June 2021 on the State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/2010, ex CP 163/2009)) implemented by Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha)
  (notified under document C(2021) 4048)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2034 of 10 June 2021 on the State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/2010, ex CP 163/2009)) implemented by Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha)
  (notified under document C(2021) 4048)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 4048)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 59938.

#### M. Furuya Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 952904-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
No. 58415.

protest 183408-K (Providence).

#### Albert A. Schneider, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, *374including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content Under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40610 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUANITA SANCHEZ DE GOMEZ, also known as Juanita Sanchez Gomez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-158-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juanita Sanchez De Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez De Gomez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 629 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 629

      Recognizing November 19, 2017, as ``A Day in Honor of Women 
                            Entrepreneurs''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2017

Ms. Meng submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Recognizing November 19, 2017, as ``A Day in Honor of Women 
                            Entrepreneurs''.

Whereas women are majority owners of 9.9 million American businesses which 
        generate $1.4 trillion in annual sales and employ more than 8.4 million 
        workers;
Whereas 2.5 million additional American businesses are equally owned by women 
        and men, accounting for another $1.1 trillion in annual sales and 6.5 
        million jobs;
Whereas, as majority business owners and joint business owners with men, women 
        entrepreneurs in America generate $453 billion in payroll for 14.9 
        million workers;
Whereas 99 percent of American women-owned businesses are small businesses;
Whereas 47 percent of all American minority-owned businesses are also women-
        owned compared to 32 percent of nonminority-owned businesses; and
Whereas ``A Day in Honor of Women Entrepreneurs'' is a day for all Americans to 
        celebrate, support, and empower women in business: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes ``A Day in Honor of Women Entrepreneurs'';
            (2) recognizes the contributions of women-owned businesses 
        to the American economy;
            (3) calls on the Department of Labor, the Department of 
        Commerce, and the Small Business Administration to further 
        commit to supporting women-owned businesses; and
            (4) commits to pursuing additional policies and creating 
        new programs that support women entrepreneurs.
                                 <all>
```
** **

**Exhibit 13.1**

**Annual CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Crucell N.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: June 29, 2006 | ** ** | ** **              | ** ** |
|--------------------------|------------|-------------------------|------------|
| ** **               | By:        | ** **              | ** ** |
| ** **               | Name:      | Ronald H.P. Brus        | ** ** |
| ** **               | Title:     | Chief Executive Officer | ** ** |

 
| Date: June 29, 2006 | ** ** | ** **              | ** ** |
|--------------------------|------------|-------------------------|------------|
| ** **               | By:        | ** **              | ** ** |
| ** **               | Name:      | Leonard Kruimer         | ** ** |
| ** **               | Title:     | Chief Financial Officer | ** ** |

 

** **

----
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20219 

Telephone: (202) 649-3800 

Facsimile: (202) 649-1071 

www.fhfa.gov 

FHLBank System at 100 Roundtable:

Access to the FHLBank System 

Wednesday, March 8, 2023 | 1:00 – 4:00 p.m. AT 

1. What are unique opportunities and challenges affecting your work in Puerto Rico and the US 

Virgin Islands? Are natural disasters and extreme weather events affecting your work and, if so, 

how? 

2. What role does the FHLBank System play in supporting affordable, equitable, sustainable, and 

resilient housing and homeownership in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands? 

3. What role does the FHLBank System play in supporting community development in Puerto Rico 

and the US Virgin Islands? Where does economic development factor in? 

4. What factors prevent the FHLBanks from playing a larger role, generally? Are there any factors 

that prevent the FHLBanks from working more effectively in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin 

Islands, specifically? If so, what are those factors, and can FHFA or the FHLBank System help 

to resolve them? 

5. Are there particular populations, market segments, or purposes that the FHLBanks may be 

uniquely positioned to support? 

6. What should the FHLBanks’ mission-related programs look like? If we could start from a blank 

slate, what would be key features? 

To submit in advance: 

• What are the unique gaps that the FHLBank can help fill in your community? 

• What is the single most important change you would recommend to best position the System to 

fulfill the role(s) you envision? If no changes are needed, why not? 

• Do you believe structural changes to the FHLBank System (e.g., consolidation, change in 

membership) would be necessary or advisable to fulfill the role(s) you envision? Why or why 

not? 

• Other bullet points outlining the points you would like to discuss
No. 64725.

#### Wm. M. Allison & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/32474 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
No. 62961.

#### Bartmann & Bixer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 84087-K, etc. (New York).

*349Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C.D. 1889), the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, on and after June 15, 1936, were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 1529(a), as modified by T.D. 48316; those entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, on and after January 1, 1948, were held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 51802; and those entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, on and after June 6,1951, were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739).
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

Direct and Indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Waste Industries USA, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Black Bear Disposal, LLC
CLD of Nashville, LLC
Duplin County Disposal, LLC
ECO Services, LLC
Laurens County Landfill, LLC
Moss Point Disposal, LLC
Old Kings Road Solid Waste, LLC
Railroad Avenue Disposal, LLC
Red Rock Disposal, LLC
Reliable Trash Service, LLC
S & S Enterprises of Mississippi, LLC
Safeguard Landfill Management, LLC
Sampson County Disposal, LLC
Shamrock Environmental Services, LLC
Southern Waste of Alabama, LLC
Southern Waste Services of Mississippi, LLC
TransWaste Services, LLC
Van Buren County Landfill, LLC
WasteCo, LLC
Waste Industries, LLC
Waste Industries LandCo, LLC
Waste Industries of Mississippi, LLC
Waste Industries of Tennessee, LLC
Waste Industries Property Co., LLC
Waste Services of Decatur, LLC
Waste Services of Memphis, LLC
Waste Services of North Carolina, LLC
Waste Services of Tennessee, LLC
(Reap. Dec. 10285)

Entry Nos. CE J-1671; CE J-1917.

#### Wheelcraft, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 27, 1962)

*Stein & Shostak,*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, consists of bicycles exported from England.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, *344charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the following unit values, net packed:

> Model No. 2902 £6-18-1

> Model No. 2903 £6-18-1

> Model No.. 2904 ■ £7-11-6

> Model No. 2905 £7-11-6

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal for reap-praisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the bicycles in question is export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and that such statutory value therefor is as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 56901.

#### Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 183257-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the correct weight of the merchandise was 20,032 pounds net, as reported by the surveyor in an amended return, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
PO
      Box
      84013


Columbus
      GA 31908-4013


Tel.
      800.784.5566





FORM
      OF
      MASTER SERVICER CERTIFICATION





Re:
      GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Trust 2005-HE3


Asset
      Backed Notes, Series 2005-HE3





I,
      Michael DeFrancesco, the senior officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. certify
      that:





(i)
      I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
      containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
      included in the year covered by this annual report, of Lehman ABS Corporation
      (the "Registrant");





(ii)
      Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
      does
      not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period
      covered by this annual report;





(iii)
      Based on my knowledge, the distribution of servicing information required to
      be
      provided to the Administrator by the Master Servicer under the Transfer and
      Servicing Agreement is included in these reports;





(iv)
      Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
      the
      report and required to be delivered to the Administrator in accordance with
      the
      terms of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in the
      reports, the Master Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
      agreement; and





(v)
      The
      reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Master Servicer's
      compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
      by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
      with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
      procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement that is included
      in these reports.





Capitalized
      terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the
      Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated August 1, 2005 (the "Transfer and
      Servicing Agreement"), among the Registrant as depositor, GreenPoint Mortgage
      Funding Trust 2005-HE3, as Issuer, the Master Servicer and LaSalle Bank National
      Association as Indenture Trustee.





GreenPoint
      Mortgage Funding, Inc., as Master Servicer





By: /s/
      Michael D. Francesco


Michael
      DeFrancesco


Senior
      Vice President, Loan Administration
No. 61218.

protests 289013-K and 293053-K (New York).

#### S. S. Kresge Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aquarium sea moss similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Westchester Aquarium Supply Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 146, C. D. 1767), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# website
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Annual Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Crucell N.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Reporton Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:   May 6, 2008

 
|   | By:                            | /s/ Ronald H.P. Brus |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Ronald H.P. Brus         |                 |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |                 |
|        |                                |                      |        |  |

 

 

Dated:   May 6,2008

 
|   | By:                            | /s/ Leonard Kruimer |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Leonard Kruimer          |                |
|   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |                |
|        |                                |                     |        |  |
## SERVED: July 10, 2014 .;·I(); .·!. ' I,· '' : -·;**_;~** 

### : <.j:::;'
....... '**.~** f=·

. "' 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTERS OF 

### REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION

FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Actiori) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0851 

### REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION

FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0852



### ORDER ON AGENCY'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereafter "Complainant';) has filed a Motionto extendtime for responding to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. Respondent's response is not yet due. Forreasons set forth in the Agency's motion, we will grant the extension. WHEREFORE, for reasons set forth in the Agency's Motion it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Agency shall file its response on orbefore August 1, 2014.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List 1

# '

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001 

### ONE COPY Reza So!tanian, Respondent's President

.Regent Aerospace Corporation and Airbase Services, Inc. 28110 West Harrison Parkway Valencia, CA 91355-4109 TEL: 661-257-3000 FAX:
. 661-702-0241 JohnS. Hoff Jeffrey Clement, Respondent's Counsel HoffLaw Group 135 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3300 Chicago, IL 60603-4134 TEL: 312-346-8111 FAX: 312-853-3924 Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel, Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7713 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 2 FDMS Nos. FAA-20 13-0851 & FAA-2013-0852 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
No. 67725.

#### W. H. S. Lloyd Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/24490, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of samples similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 118, C.D. 2243), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.