alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,879,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,084,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (50,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    560,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,891,822
<PP&E>                                         639,324
<DEPRECIATION>                               (265,868)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,793,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,250,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,063,414
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,520,802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,793,100
<SALES>                                     15,063,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,063,615
<CGS>                                       14,283,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,931,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               364,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,269,752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,269,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,269,752)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)


</TABLE>
No. 49052.

#### Protest 104851-K of Monarch Watch Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was agreed between the parties that the articles in question consist of “unadjusted watch movements more than 1 inch wide but less than 1.77 inches wide, having 7 jewels.” The claim was therefore sustained to this extent.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1129 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1129

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 60-month 
limitation period on the allowance of a deduction of interest on loans 
                     for higher education expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1999

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 60-month 
limitation period on the allowance of a deduction of interest on loans 
                     for higher education expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 60-MONTH LIMITATION PERIOD ON DEDUCTION OF 
              INTEREST ON HIGHER EDUCATION LOANS.

    (a) Limitation on Period Deduction Allowed.--Section 221 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to interest on education loans) 
is amended by striking subsection (d).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98807; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2023-058]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule Related 
to Physical Port Fees

October 27, 2023.
    On September 1, 2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
amend certain connectivity and port fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on September 20, 2023.\4\ On September 29, 2023, pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\5\ the Commission: (1) temporarily suspended 
the proposed rule change; and (2) instituted proceedings under Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On October 25, 2023, the 
Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CboeEDGX-2023-058).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98390 (September 14, 
2023), 88 FR 64930.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98651, 88 FR 68852 
(October 4, 2023).
    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24172 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
No. 63527.

protests 199945-K, etc. (New York).

#### American Express Company and John J. Ryan & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 267, C.D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.
EXHIBIT 99.2:

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:

o    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

o    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the company's financial condition and results of operation.


-------------------------------------
  Linda L. Engle, Executive VP & CFO


Dated:
      -------------------------------
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 212 / Friday, November 3, 2023 / Presidential Documents 75475 

Notice of November 1, 2023 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 

(weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 

On July 28, 1998, by Executive Order 13094, the President amended Executive 

Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons 

of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, by Executive 

Order 13382, the President, among other things, further amended Executive 

Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. The proliferation 

of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them continues 

to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 

policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, with 

respect to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means 

of delivering such weapons must continue beyond November 14, 2023. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 

declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 1, 2023. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24504 

Filed 11–2–23; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC9BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
No. 51550.

#### Protests 113267-K, etc., of Bohemian Distributing Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of the various barrels, casks, packages, etc., was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination because of breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held *157that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gaugers’ returns as verified by the affidavits of the importers. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 52165.

protests 5796-K, etc. (Boston, etc.).

#### H. P. Lambert Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
January 21, 1952

No. 56304.

Suit 4677.

#### United States *v.*Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.

Reap. Dec. 7949 affirmed November 7, 1951. C. A. D. 468.
No. 61722.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 292798-K (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lenses for photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Oust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, the merchandise in question is dutiable as photographic lenses, the claim of the plaintiff at 25 percent was sustained.
14 Figure 10. Distribution of Si te-level Ratio of Annual 98 th Percentile Concentration/Annual Mean, 2006-2008

Overall

U.S. Southeast Northeast Industrial Midwest Upper Midwest Southwest Northwest So. CA Outlying Sites 1 2 3 4 5 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTCODE, INC. : 

: 

Plaintiff, : 

: No. 03-4301 

v. : 

: 

DIGITRONICS INVENTIONEERING CORP. : 

: 

Defendant. : 

 PLAINTIFF, WESTCODE, INC.’S MOTION 

TO VACATE OR MODIFY THE ARBITRATION AWARD

AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, Westcode, Inc. for the reasons set forth more fully in 

the accompanying memorandum of law and statement of undisputed facts, which are 

incorporated herein by reference, to respectfully request the entry of an order vacating 

and/or modifying the July 15, 2003 arbitration Award. 

Respectfully submitted, 

PHILLIPS & CAMPBELL, P.C.

____________________________________ 

Patrick C. Campbell, Jr. 

ID No. 53350 

One Belmont Avenue, Ste. 518 

Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 

610/668-4970 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: September 5, 2003 

Case 2:03-cv-04301-TJS Document 3 Filed 09/05/03 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 5, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50174 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR MANUEL ARROYO-BALDERAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CV-168-5-PRM

-------------------- Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Victor Manuel Arroyo-Balderas pleaded guilty to a superseding information charging him with misprision of a felony. Arroyo has appealed his conviction, arguing that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered because the factual basis does not support his guilty plea to misprision of a felony. Arroyo concedes that this court’s review is for plain error. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).No. 04-50174 -2- Arroyo has not shown that the district court plainly erred in determining that the guilty plea had a basis in fact establishing the essential elements of the offense. The record reflects that Arroyo understood that he was pleading guilty to failing to disclose to an FBI agent that he knew of a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d)(2)(A). Moreover, any error on the part of the district court did not affect Arroyo’s substantial rights. Arroyo’s plea was to a substantially reduced charge after the Government had presented its evidence and after Arroyo’s motion for a judgment of acquittal was denied. The facts and charges were well understood by the parties at that stage of the proceeding. The judgment is AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION 

 :

 v. :

 :

ANGEL CASTILLO-BIENVENIDO : NO. 03-487-01

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Angel CastilloBienvenido’s “Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)” (Docket No. 650),

and all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying

Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova, J. 

______________________

John R. Padova, J.

Case 2:03-cr-00487-JP Document 677 Filed 05/30/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
13.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Given Imaging Ltd. (the "Company") hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge that:
 
 (i)    the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
 
 (ii)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 26, 2010
 
 
 /s/ Yuval
Yanai
 Yuval
Yanai
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
**Exhibit 13.1**

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Genesys, a French *société**anonyme* (the “Company”), doeshereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

The Annual Reporton Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 20-F”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated May 18, 2006 |   |                                 |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                    | By:    | /s/ François Legros             |
|                    |   | François Legros                 |
|                    |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   |                                 |
| Dated May 18, 2006 |   |                                 |
|                    | By:    | /s/ Michael E. Savage                |
|                    |   | Michael E. Savage                    |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer              |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Genesys and will be retained by Genesys and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Before the Third Division,

March 24, 1955

No. 58867.

protests 42159-K, etc. (Minneapolis).

#### The Dayton Company et al. *v.*United States,

*316Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.
No. 50323.

#### Protests 62772-K, etc., of Hargo Woolen Co. et al. (New York).

*224Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Eliron
      Yaron, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
      Shelron Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition


and
      results of operations of Shelron Group, Inc.








By: 
      /s/ Eliron Yaron


Name:
      Eliron Yaron


Title:
      Chairman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    48627
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8426)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 56835
<PP&E>                                           11387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7043)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  166750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (47974)
<BONDS>                                       (141431)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      151364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (166750)
<SALES>                                          43117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 43117
<CGS>                                             8436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    37991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (239)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 11434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1526)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Amendment No. 1 to
Appendix A to Employment Agreement
Between Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
and
Brent F. Heffron
 Base Salary, Bonus Compensation and Benefits
 1.
    
    Effective July 14, 2005, Employees title(s) shall be Executive Vice President and President
  Eastern Division. Effective August 1, 2005, Employees Base Salary shall be $325,000.
Effective August 1, 2006, Employee shall be eligible for a Base Salary increase of $25,000 per
year, based upon the achievement of performance criteria to be established by the Compensation
Committee. Employees principal location shall be Greenville, South Carolina metropolitan
area.2.
    
    Paragraph 2 of Appendix A is unaffected by this amendment and remains in full force and
effect.3.
    
    For Fiscal Year 2006, the Employee shall be eligible to receive a maximum Bonus of up to 130%
of his Base Salary (or up to $422,500) based on such performance criteria as the Compensation
Committee shall deem appropriate in its discretion.
 Agreed to and accepted:
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.Date: October 11, 2005
    By:
    /s/JAMES W. MCFARLANDJames W. McFarlandCompensation Committee Chairman EMPLOYEEDate: October 11, 2005
    /s/ BRENT F. HEFFRONBrent F. Heffron