alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Convera Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
C. Condo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ PATRICK C. CONDO
Patrick C. Condo
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 30, 2004
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MARTIN AKERMAN,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent

______________________

2024-132

______________________

On Petition for Permission to Appeal from the Merit 

Systems Protection Board in No. DC-1221-22-0257-W-2.

______________________

ON PETITION AND MOTION

______________________

Before STOLL, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Martin Akerman petitions for permission for interlocutory appeal from a May 31, 2024 Acknowledgement Order 

issued by an administrative judge of the Merit Systems 

Protection Board. Mr. Akerman also moves to hold the petition in abeyance, ECF No. 4, and objects to the caption, 

ECF No. 5. We deny the petition and the motions.

Case: 24-132 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2024
2 AKERMAN v. ARMY

The May 31, 2024 order is the administrative judge’s 

acknowledgement of the refiling of Mr. Akerman’s appeal 

following dismissal subject to automatic reinstatement. In 

that order, the administrative judge denied a request for 

joinder of the National Guard and reiterated previous rulings as to the scope of the appeal and extent of permitted 

discovery. Mr. Akerman’s petition here asks this court to 

reverse those aspects of the May 31, 2024 order.

In matters from the Board, this court’s jurisdiction is 

generally limited to “an appeal from a final order or final

decision,” 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9) (emphases added), and 

“an order is final only when it ends the litigation on the 

merits and leaves nothing for the [tribunal] to do but execute the judgment,” Weed v. Social Sec. Admin., 571 F.3d 

1359, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (cleaned up). The May 31, 2024 

order clearly does not resolve the merits of Mr. Akerman’s 

appeal before the Board, which remains pending. And Mr. 

Akerman has not identified, and the court is not aware of, 

any basis for this court’s immediate, interlocutory review 

of the administrative judge’s order under the circumstances. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition and all pending motions are denied.

July 5, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

Case: 24-132 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 07/05/2024
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, RodgerWeismann, Chief Financial Officer of Phase Forward Incorporated (the “Company”),in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to therequirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

 

·                   the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

·                   the information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

This certification isbeing provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of theReport, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ RODGER WEISMANN                                                                          |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Rodger Weismann   Chief Financial Officer   Phase Forward Incorporated   August 8, 2008 |

 

----
No. 51869.

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 319516-G, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46499-46500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18802]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8812]

In the Matter of the Review and Amendment of the Designation of 
Harakat ul-Mujahidin; aka Harakat ul-Mujahideen; aka Harakat ul-Ansar; 
aka Jamiat ul-Ansar; aka HUA; aka HUM; aka al-Hadid; aka al-Hadith; aka 
al-Faran; as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) and (b) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C), (b)) (``INA''), 
and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, the Secretary of State concludes that the circumstances that 
were the basis for the 2008 decision to maintain the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization have 
not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the 
designation and that the national security of the United States does 
not

[[Page 46500]]

warrant a revocation of the designation of Harakat ul-Mujahidin, and 
that there is a sufficient factual basis to find that Harakat ul-
Mujahidin, also known under the aliases listed above, uses or has used 
additional aliases, namely, Ansar ul-Ummah.
    Therefore, the Secretary of State hereby determines that the 
designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist 
organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall 
be maintained. In addition, effective upon the date of publication in 
the Federal Register, the Secretary of State hereby amends the 2008 
review of Harakat ul-Mujahidin as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Sec.  219(b) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189(b)), to include the 
following new alias and other possible transliterations thereof:

Ansar ul-Ummah

    Dated: July 23, 2014.
 John F. Kerry,
 Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-18802 Filed 8-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
No. 53379.

protests 124601-K, etc. (New York).

#### Simon Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------



                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-16;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


          Date: March 24, 2006


                                            /s/ Steve Bailey
                                            ----------------
                                            Steve Bailey
                                            Senior Managing Director
No. P68/108.

protest 298200-K (New York).

#### The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies, Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1034

To declare a portion of the James River and Kanawha Canal in Richmond,

Virginia, to be nonnavigable waters of the United States for purposes

of title 46, United States Code, and the other maritime laws of the

United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1999

Mr. BLILEY (for himself and Mr. SCOTT) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To declare a portion of the James River and Kanawha Canal

in Richmond, Virginia, to be nonnavigable waters of the

United States for purposes of title 46, United States

Code, and the other maritime laws of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds the following:

5 (1) The James River and Kanawha Canal, lo6 cated in Richmond, Virginia, played an important

7 part in the economic development of the Common8 wealth of Virginia and the City of Richmond.
2

•HR 1034 IH

1 (2) The canal ceased to operate as a function2 ing waterway in the conduct of commerce in the late

3 1800’s.

4 (3) Portions of the canal have been found by a

5 Federal district court to be nonnavigable.

6 (4) The restored portion of the canal will be

7 utilized to provide entertainment and education to

8 visitors and will play an important part in the eco9 nomic development of downtown Richmond.

10 (5) The restored portion of the canal will not be

11 utilized for general public boating, and will be re12 stricted to activities similar to those conducted on

13 similar waters in San Antonio, Texas.

14 (6) The continued classification of the canal as

15 navigable waters of the United States based on his16 toric usage that ceased more than 100 years ago

17 does not serve the public interest and is not nec18 essary to protect public safety.

19 (7) Congressional action is required to clarify

20 that the canal is no longer to be treated as navigable

21 waters of the United States.
3

•HR 1034 IH

1 SEC. 2. PORTION OF JAMES RIVER AND KANAWHA CANAL

2 DECLARED TO BE NONNAVIGABLE WATERS

3 OF THE UNITED STATES.

4 The portion of the canal known as the James River

5 and Kanawha Canal in Richmond, Virginia, between the

6 Great Ship Lock on the East and the border of the City

7 of Richmond on the West is declared to be nonnavigable

8 waters of the United States for purposes of title 46,

9 United States Code, and the other maritime laws of the

10 United States.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael E. Seifert, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael E. Seifert

Michael E. Seifert
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2004
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF

MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION



|                                 |  |             
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Legal Name                       |  | Jurisdiction
|PRC Williston, LLC               |  | Delaware    
|Magnum Hunter Resources GP, LLC  |  | Delaware    
|Magnum Hunter Resources LP       |  | Delaware    
|Eagle Ford Hunter, Inc.          |  | Colorado    
|Triad Hunter, LLC                |  | Delaware    
|Alpha Hunter Drilling, LLC       |  | Delaware    
|Eureka Hunter Pipeline, LLC      |  | Delaware    
|Eureka Hunter Land, LLC          |  | Delaware    
|Hunter Aviation, LLC             |  | Delaware    
|Hunter Real Estate, LLC          |  | Delaware    
|NGAS Hunter, LLC                 |  | Delaware    
|MHR Acquisition Company III, LLC |  | Delaware    
|MHR CallCo Corporation           |  | Alberta     
|MHR ExchangeCo Corporation       |  | Alberta     
|Magnum Hunter Production, Inc.   |  | Kentucky    
|Energy Hunter Securities, Inc.   |  | Kentucky    
|Sentra Corporation               |  | Kentucky    
|NGAS Gathering, LLC              |  | Kentucky    
|54NG, LLC                        |  | Kentucky    
|Williston Hunter ND, LLC         |  | Delaware    
|Magnum Hunter Midstream, LLC     |  | Delaware    
|Triad Hunter Gathering, LLC      |  | Delaware    
|Magnum Hunter Marketing, LLC     |  | Delaware    
|Williston Hunter Canada, Inc.    |  | Alberta     
|Williston Hunter, Inc.           |  | Delaware
Before the Second Division,

November 12, 1959

No. 63504.

protest 58/22910 (Boston).

#### Montanore, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Document

Exhibit 10.34
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE
CNO SERVICES, LLC
EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE to the CNO Services, LLC Executive Severance Pay Plan is executed this 21st day of December, 2020, to be effective as of October 1, 2020 (the "Effective Date") by CNO Services, LLC (the "Company").


WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Company established and maintains the CNO Services, LLC Executive Severance Pay Plan (the "Plan"); and


WHEREAS, the Plan was most recently amended and restated effective as of November 13, 2019; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth below;


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power and authority reserved to the Manager of the Company pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Plan, and as approved by the Manager of the Company, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the Effective Date, as follows:


1.Section 4.1 Amount of Benefit, subsection (c) COBRA Benefits of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:


"(c)      COBRA Benefits.  For each Terminated Employee whose Employment Termination Date is on or after November 13, 2019, who elects COBRA continuation coverage pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ("COBRA"), under one or more of the Employer's medical, dental, vision, On-Site Clinic, EAP and/or Health Care FSA coverages, hereinafter referred to as "COBRA Coverages," the Terminated Employee's Employer will subsidize the cost of the COBRA Coverages for up to eighteen (18) months.  The amount of the subsidy paid by the Employer shall be determined based upon the portion of the Employer's premium payment made for active employees immediately prior to the Terminated Employee's Employment Termination Date, and the Terminated Employee's Base Salary in effect immediately prior to the Terminated Employee's Employment Termination Date.  Such subsidized payments will be paid directly to the carrier/administrator on a monthly basis in accordance with the Employer's usual schedule for remitting payment.  The subsidized COBRA Coverage premium payment will be treated as taxable compensation to the Terminated Employee, and will be subject to all applicable federal, state, local and other taxes, including any gross-up amount to be paid by the Employer for such taxes, in accordance with the Employer's normal payroll schedule and procedures.  Subsidy payments as determined above may be changed to be consistent with any changes in plans and/or coverage tiers, as elected by the Terminated Employee, and as allowed by COBRA."
1








2.In all other respects, the Plan shall be and remain unchanged.


This Amendment Number One is duly executed as of the Effective Date set forth above.




						
	CNO SERVICES, LLC
		
		
	By:	/s/ Yvonne K. Franzese
		
	Printed Name:	Yvonne K. Franzese
		
	Title:	EVP, Chief Human Resources Officer




2
No. 56300.

protests 176856-K, etc. (New York).

#### Air Clearance Assn., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of live birds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Mazer*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1265), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 55119.

#### Bunge North American Grain Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 153730-K (New York).

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest consists of rapeseed oil which was assessed with duty at the rate of 6 cents per gallon under the provision therefor in paragraph 53 of the Tariff Act of 1930, plus tax or duty at the rate of 4% cents per pound under the provision for rapeseed oil in section 2491 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code. The protest claim is for entry free of the duties and taxes assessed, and an alternative claim is that the said duties and taxes were taken upon a greater quantity of oil than was withdrawn from warehouse and entered into the commerce of the United States. When the protest was called for trial, counsel for the plaintiff offered in evidence all of the papers forwarded by the collector of customs with the protest to this court, and, there being no objection, each and all of the papers were so admitted in evidence. Thereupon, both parties submitted the case for decision, and, although time was requested and allowed for the filing of briefs, none was filed.

. It appears that the protest is directed against the assessment of duties and taxes upon the difference between the quantity of rapeseed oil imported and placed in a bonded storage tank and the quantity withdrawn from the said tank for consumption. The difference, according to the record, was the result of an accident or mishap whereby a valve was left open and some of the oil was dumped on the ground and flowed into a nearby stream and was lost. Duties and taxes were taken on the basis of the quantity imported.

According to the record, no effort was made on the part of the plaintiff to avail itself of the provisions of the tariff act and customs regulations applicable to abate-ments or refunds of duties, and our attention has been directed to no provision of law under which this court can afford relief in the circumstances.

On the record made we have no other course than to overrule the protest claims, and judgment will issue accordingly.
43

APPENDIX – C

month:_________(year:________

UAS$#:$___________ Date(Issue(

Discovered

Date(Issue(

Addressed

Software(Updates

Airframe(

Engines

Propellers

Camera(Gimbal

Landing(Gear

Vibration(Dampening

Other:

M ONTHLY M AINT ENANCE LOG

Issue(Description(&(Maintenance(Conducted Maintenance(Performed(By:(((

Print(&(Sign
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Salem Communications Corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge: · the Quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  · the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: November 8, 2010By: /s/ EVAN D. MASYREvan D. MasyrSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Brian Fiddler, of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: April 30, 2015



Brian
FiddlerBrian Fiddler Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---