alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 50837.

#### Protest 119627-K of W. J. Byrnes Co. of N. Y., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

An examination of the record disclosing nothing of evidential value sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  L.206 Money Market Mutual Fund Shares  
 Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineMoney market mutual funds; total financial assets
	FL634090005
	2724.6
	2754.7
	2644.7
	2615.1
	2667.7
	2754.7
	2758.8
	2692.2
	2672.0
	1Households and nonprofit organizations; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL153034005
	1113.2
	1068.4
	1016.1
	999.6
	1006.3
	1068.4
	1035.9
	986.0
	972.5
	2Nonfinancial corporate business; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL103034003
	558.2
	576.8
	545.3
	546.2
	558.8
	576.8
	574.6
	577.0
	575.2
	3Nonfinancial noncorporate business; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL113034003
	85.6
	91.7
	86.9
	88.5
	89.6
	91.7
	93.2
	94.7
	96.0
	4State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL213034003
	165.3
	177.5
	169.0
	170.1
	173.8
	177.5
	178.5
	179.6
	181.9
	5Property-casualty insurance companies; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL513034003
	18.3
	21.5
	18.9
	19.5
	20.6
	21.5
	20.4
	20.7
	19.7
	6Life insurance companies; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL543034005
	53.3
	56.1
	51.5
	50.5
	61.6
	56.1
	58.4
	54.7
	54.0
	7Private pension funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL573034005
	155.6
	151.0
	147.8
	148.7
	151.2
	151.0
	153.3
	153.8
	154.3
	8State and local government employee retirement funds; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL223034005
	51.6
	51.9
	52.2
	52.9
	51.3
	51.9
	48.8
	50.6
	50.7
	9Funding corporations; money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL503034003
	410.3
	445.3
	447.2
	430.5
	443.5
	445.3
	481.1
	463.3
	456.5
	10Rest of the world; U.S. money market mutual fund shares; asset
	FL263034003
	113.2
	114.5
	109.9
	108.7
	110.9
	114.5
	114.7
	111.9
	111.1
	11 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
No. 58857.

protest 195377-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alfred Orlik, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*313Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with; stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), for “Works of art * * * statuary, sculptures, or copies, replicas, or reproductions thereof, valued at not less than $2.50.”
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
   
     Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. hereby consents to all references made to it in
Amendment No. 4 to this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of SpinCycle, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 1998.
    
 
                                          /s/ PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Pedersen & Houpt, P.C.
 
Chicago, Illinois
   
November 13, 1998
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-KSB/A for Fund.com Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit
(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Fund.com Inc. does hereby certify,
pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
August 21, 2008




/s/
Gregory Webster


Gregory
Webster


Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 11.1 Earnings per Share Calculation

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                                    1999               1998
                                                                                 ------------      ------------
<S>                                                                              <C>               <C>
Net loss applicable to common stock                                              $(2,311,220)      $(2,623,595)

Weighted average number of common shares equivalent:
Common shares outstanding                                                          4,615,329         3,941,811
Common equivalent shares representing shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants                                      --                --

Incremental common equivalent shares (calculated using the higher of end of
period or average fair market value)

             Total weighted average shares - as adjusted                           4,615,329         3,941,811

Basic                                                                            $     (0.50)      $     (0.67)
Diluted                                                                          $     (0.50)      $     (0.67)
</TABLE>
S01G1721.

#### BOLDEN v. THE STATE.

(563 SE2d 858)

Hunstein, Justice.

We granted Cordie Bolden’s petition for certiorari to address whether the Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the State could use Bolden’s plea of nolo contendere to establish a violation of her probation. See *Bolden v. State,*250 Ga. App. 825 (552 SE2d 533) (2001). We hold that under the plain and unambiguous language of OCGA § 17-*1817-95 (c) a nolo contendere plea cannot be used to establish a probation violation. Accordingly, we reverse.

Decided May 13, 2002.

*Gerard B. Kleinrock,*for appellant.

*J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District*Attorney, for appellee.

Bolden pled guilty on June 1, 2000 to two drug-related crimes and was sentenced as a first offender pursuant to OCGA § 42-8-60. While on probation Bolden was arrested on a charge of theft by taking. She pled nolo contendere to that misdemeanor charge on July 27, .2000. The State filed a petition to revoke her probation on August 4, 2000 and at the revocation hearing, the State over objection was allowed to admit Bolden’s nolo contendere plea to establish that Bolden had violated the terms of her probation.

“Except as otherwise provided by law, a plea of nolo contendere shall not be used against the defendant in any other court or proceedings as an admission of guilt or otherwise or for any purpose.” OCGA § 17-7-95 (c). Contrary to the State’s argument, the record in this case clearly reveals that Bolden’s nolo contendere plea was used by the State to establish that Bolden had violated the terms of her probation1 and that the nolo contendere plea was not adduced for consideration merely as aggravating evidence in a sentence proceeding, as allowed pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-2 (a). Because the clear and unambiguous language of OCGA § 17-7-95 (c) prohibits the use of a nolo contendere plea “as an admission of guilt or otherwise or for any purpose” and because there is no exception otherwise provided by law for the use of nolo contendere pleas at probation revocation hearings for the purpose of establishing violation of the terms of probation, the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the probation revocation court’s admission of this evidence.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 No other evidence was adduced by the State at the hearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 681 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 115
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 681

                          [Report No. 115-503]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 140) to amend the White 
   Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to 
        clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2018

     Mr. Cole, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 140) to amend the White 
   Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to 
        clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (S. 140) to amend the White 
Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to 
clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 
115-54 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, 
as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, 
to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate equally divided among and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural 
Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 115

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 681

                          [Report No. 115-503]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 140) to amend the White 
   Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to 
        clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 9, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
# Español

## Aviso para los prestatarios sobre el idioma 

**Es probable que la transacción de su préstamo hipotecario se lleve a cabo en inglés.**La información que reciba y los documentos oficiales que firme probablemente estarán en inglés.

**Queremos que entienda la transacción. Es posible que haya servicios de traducción disponibles para complementar los documentos que están en inglés.**El objetivo de estos documentos es ayudarlo a entender la transacción. Es posible que su prestamista o su proveedor de servicio no puedan proporcionarle servicios de traducción ni los documentos traducidos.

**Es posible que también haya recursos y asistencia de idioma disponibles a través de agencias de asesoramiento sobre vivienda** aprobadas por el Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD).****Puede encontrar una lista de agencias de asesoramiento sobre vivienda aprobadas por el HUD en www.hud.gov/counseling.

1. Seleccione una agencia de asesoramiento sobre vivienda cercana a su domicilio haciendo clic en “housing counseling agency” (agencia de asesoramiento sobre vivienda); luego, elija su estado.

2. Para encontrar agencias de asesoramiento sobre vivienda en su área en las que se hable su idioma, seleccione “Click here to narrow your search” (Haga clic aquí para limitar la búsqueda) y elija un idioma.  

3. O bien llame al HUD al 800-569-4287 para que lo ayuden a encontrar a un asesor. 

También puede obtener información sobre asesores de vivienda en www.consumerfinance.gov/find-a-housing-counselor.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waste Industries USA, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.

| | /s/  JIM W. PERRY                                    | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                                                      | 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer March 31, 2003 | 
| |                                                      | 
| |                                                      | 
| | /s/  D. STEPHEN GRISSOM                              | 
| |                                                      | 
| | Chief Financial Officer March 31, 2003               |
Before the Third Division,

December 27, 1944

No. 49920.

#### Petition 6439-R of Bill & Caldwell, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It appeared that the additional duties accrued because of the fact that the merchandise was entered on the basis of foreign value and was appraised on the basis of cost of production. From the testimony produced the court was of the opinion that the importer was without intent to defraud the Government or deceive its officials as to the proper value of the merchandise, and that there was an honest difference of opinion between the importer and the Government appraiser. The petition was therefore granted.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on From 10-K of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: October 31, 2008 |  | /s/ Carmel Vernia
Carmel Vernia Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12254]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary exhibition or display in the Department of Greek and Roman Art of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-24410 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
No. 57903.

protests 82119-K, etc. (Baltimore).

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States,

ef!0pinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist Cjf(ggures and articles, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same ig ail 'material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, and that the items rjípjked “B” consist of articles, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the same in all material respects (except the component material of chief value) as the merchandise involved in said Abstract 56975. On the agreed facts and following the cited case, the items marked *“A”*were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as manufactures of papier máché, not specially provided for, and the itemé marked “B” at 33% percent under paragraph 412, as manufactures, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for.
kop-ex1044_329.htm



Exhibit 10.44

Amendment to the

Koppers Holdings Inc. Benefit Restoration Plan

 

 

WHEREAS, Koppers Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the Koppers Holding Inc. Benefit Restoration Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain key employees;

 

WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section 7.1 of the Plan; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to provide that an employee will not be eligible to participate in the Plan unless the employee is eligible to receive a contribution greater than or equal to $250 for the initial plan year in which s/he would become a participant.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT

 

RESOLVED, that the Plan shall be and hereby is amended, effective January 1, 2020, as follows:

 

1.Section 2.13 (Eligible Employee) is hereby amended by adding a new sentence to the end thereof to read as follows:

 

“Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, an Employee who was not previously a Participant shall not become an Eligible Employee until the Plan Year in which the Company Contribution that would be credited to the Employee under the terms of the Plan for that Plan Year would be greater than or equal to $250.”

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be adopted, effective as of the date set forth above.

 

KOPPERS HOLDINGS INC. 

 

By: _/s/ Daniel R. Groves____________________

 

Title: Vice President, Culture and Engagement___

 

ATTEST: __Shirley Chabalie_________________



DB1/ 111122569.2