alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 59428.

protests 266424-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bemo Shipping Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*301Opinion by

Pord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report") of BUCS Financial Corp (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Herbert J.
Moltzan,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Matthew J. Ford,  Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to '906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2007



/s/Herbert J. Moltzan                            /s/Matthew J. Ford
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------
Herbert J. Moltzan                               Matthew J. Ford
President and Chief Executive Officer            Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,796
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,120,926
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,543
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,001,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,296
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               234,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (252,944)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.018)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.018)


</TABLE>
exhibit1014-employmentag






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14 





 






/s/ Douglas M. VanOort /s/ Douglas Brown Exhibit 10.14 





 






Exhibit 10.14
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-096
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Adam A. Kablanian, President and Chief Executive Officer of Virage Logic Corporation, certify
that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report of Virage Logic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 5, 2005 /s/ Adam A. Kablanian

Adam A. Kablanian
President and Chief Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

July 24, 1946

No. 51254.

#### Protests 38994-K/89547, etc., of American Express Co. et al. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801) which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Dais Analytic Corporation, (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy N.
Tangredi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: March 31,
      2009
              
              /s/
      Timothy N. TangrediTimothy
      N. TangrediPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Case No. 13,066.

#### SMITH v. JOHNSON.

[4 Blatchf. 252.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 4, 1859.

Copyright — Provisional Injunction — Reference to Master.

1. On a motion for a provisional injunction, for the alleged violation of a copyright for a map, a reference will not he made to a master to examine the rival maps, and report the facts, with his opinion.

2. Such a motion must be disposed of on the moving papers of the plaintiff and the affidavits on the part of the defendant.

In equity. This was an application for a provisional injunction, to restrain the defendant [D. Griffing Johnson] from publishing and selling a map, in violation of a copyright granted to the plaintiff [Robert P. Smith].

Alfred Conkling, for plaintiffs.

Peter Y. Cutler, for defendant.

INGERSODL, District Judge.

It does not satisfactorily appear that what the defendant has thus far done is, or what he intends to do will be, in violation of the rights of the plaintiffs. The proof on the part of the defendant is explicit, that, in preparing his map, he has used materials which he had a right to use, and that, in the production of his work, so far as it has progressed, he has not been aided by any of the maps of the plaintiffs. Neither does it appear that he will, in the further progress of his work, infringe upon any of the rights of the plaintiffs. Judging from the affidavits which he has exhibited, he intends to make his map from materials and sources to which the plaintiffs have no exclusive right. Should it hereafter appear, in the further progress of this suit, that the defendant is doing anything in contravention of the exclusive rights secured to the plaintiffs, the motion for an injunction can be renewed.

It has been suggested that it should be referred to a master to examine the maps of the plaintiffs, and also the map of the defendant, and to report the facts as they may be made to appear to him, with his opinion on the question of the infringement of right. Such a course is sometimes adopted upon the final hearing, but not when the question comes up on a motion for a preliminary injunction. Such motion must be disposed of on the moving papers of the plaintiffs, and the affidavits on the part of the defendant in opposition thereto.

I do not see sufficient ground to grant -the injunction prayed for. The motion must, therefore, be denied.
Before the First Division,

January 24, 1952

No. 56292.

protest 174503-K (San Francisco).

#### Pan American Commercial Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pikake shells similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55389, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained.
PRODUCTION

# Oracle APEX

Reset Password

## Getting Started

                  -  Learn More
A page for those just getting started or wanting to learn more about Oracle Application Express.
 
                  -  apex.oracle.com
A free, hosted service where you can try out the latest version of Oracle Application Express.
 
                  -  Oracle Learning Library
Oracle by Examples (OBEs) provide prerequisite files and step-by-step instructions with screen shots that walk you through building various application components.
 

## More Information

                  -  Discussion Forum
Get free community-driven support for your Application Express questions on the OTN discussion forums. 
 
                  -  Application Express Community
Review references, applications, consulting companies, hosting companies and more.
 
                  -  Oracle APEX Shortcuts
A collection of short, memorable URLs, that you can use to quickly navigate to commonly used APEX resources.
 

## Tasks

                  -  Reset Password
Unable to sign in to your workspace? Try resetting your password here.
 
                  -  Find My Workspace
Forgotten which workspaces you are associated with? You can find out here.
 
                  -  Administration
Sign in to Administration Services.
 

                -  Twitter 
                -  LinkedIn 
                -  Facebook 
                -  YouTube
Before the Third Division,

October 29, 1953

No. 57578.

#### Alex. Murphy & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 191106-K (Philadelphia).

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise at issue in this case consists of the iron drums imported as containers of cinnamon leaf oil. Duty was assessed thereon at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 328 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the drums are entitled to free entry as American goods returned under paragraph 1615 (b), as amended.

At the trial of this case, it was orally stipulated and agreed between the parties as follows:

> Mr. Tompkins: I hereby offer to agree and stipulate that this protest is limited to seven steel drums used upon importation as the usual containers of cinnamon leaf oil out of the shipment of nine steel drums as specified on the invoice dated November 3, 1942, from R. C. Treatt & Co., Ltd., covered by the protest herein, which drums were appraised at $10 each, net packed, and were assessed with duty at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 328; Tariff Act of 1930, and that said seven drums were produced or manufactured in the United States and were returned to the United States without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means.

> The importer waives the right to contest the assessment at 24 cents per drum as authorized under section 10.7 *(a)*of the Customs Regulations of 1943 for failure to produce satisfactory evidence of allowance or non-allowance of drawback upon the exportation of said seven drums from the United States.

> That when said seven drums were imported into the United States under the above invoice of R. C. Treatt & Co., Ltd. the importer filed all necessary papers and complied with all regulations of the Secretary to obtain duty-free classification (except for the above-mentioned drawback assessment of 24 cents per drum) under paragraph 1615 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, except that record evidence of exportation was not filed. However, the Collector is satisfied by the production of other evidence as to the existence of all facts upon which the entry of the said seven drums under said paragraph 1615 is dependent as prescribed by section 10.2 of said Customs Regulations of 1943.

> Mr. Grossman: Upon the advice of Mr. Kilpatrick, Deputy Collector of Customs at Philadelphia in charge of liquidation, the Government so stipulates.

In view of the agreed statement of facts, judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff as to the seven drums referred to above, which the record shows were returned by the appraiser as “Believed to be of American origin,” directing the collector to reliquidate the entry, assessing duty upon said drums at 24 cents per drum, as provided for in paragraph 1615 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, and the Customs Regulations of 1943, section 10.7 *(a),*and refund all duties taken in excess. In all other respects, the protest is overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of SurgLine International, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K/A No. 3for the period ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas G Toland, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.  /s/ Thomas G TolandThomas G TolandPrincipal Executive OfficerMarch 9, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SurgLine International Inc. and will be retained by SurgLine International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K of ATEL Cash  Distribution
Fund IX, LLC;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
     those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report
     is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  as of December 31, 2003 (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:          6/1/2004

/s/ Dean L. Cash
---------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of Managing Member
No. 59399.

protest 246095-K (New York).

#### Arthur H. Lee & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

*288Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of colored cotton cloth, of average yarn number 3.80, valued at over 90 cents per pound, and woven with two or more colors or kinds of filling, but that it is not jacquard figured, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.