alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 76754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24571]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 22, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) One Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri, 64198. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#662d250716160a0f0507120f090805090b0b03081215260d054800140448091401"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85cec6e4f5f5e9ece6e4f1eceaebe6eae8e8e0ebf1f6c5eee6abe3f7e7abeaf7e2">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Sarah George, Louisburg, Kansas; to join the Shannon Family 
Control Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of 
Central Kansas Bancshares, Inc., Woodbine, Kansas, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of The Citizens State Bank and Trust 
Company, Council Grove, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-24571 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

|Hamilton PC                  
|-----------------------------
|                             
|2121 S. Oneida St., Suite 312
|Denver, CO 80224             
|P: (303) 548-8072            
|F: (888) 466-4216            
|ed@hamiltonpccpa.com         

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statement:

|(1) | Form S-8 pertaining to Alternet Systems, Inc. 2008
      Professional/Consultant Compensation Plan filed on January 29, 2008, of
      our report dated March 28, 2012 on the consolidated balance sheets of the
      company as at December 31, 2011 and December 20, 2010 and the results of
      its operations and its cash flows and the changes in stockholders deficit
      for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hamilton, PCSeptember 27, 2012

1

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-41025 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DOUGLAS RAY STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-93-CR-115-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 30, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Douglas Ray Stevens appeals his convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a firearm by a fugitive. Stevens contends that the district court erred by refusing to admit evidence of a polygraph examination he took and that the district court erred by denying his motion to sever the charges into different counts for the two different weapons he was alleged to have possessed.No. 95-41025 - 2 - The rejection of the polygraph evidence was not an abuse of discretion. The questions asked during the procedure were of marginal relevance; the modification of one of the more relevant questions was questionable; and the defense refused to allow the Government to participate effectively in the polygraph procedure. See United States v. Pettigrew , 77 F.3d 1500, 1514-15 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Posado , 57 F.3d 428, 432 (5th Cir. 1995). The denial of Stevens’s severance motion was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Holloway , 1 F.3d 307, 310 (5th Cir. 1993). First, Stevens’s allegation that the Government produced no evidence of possession of one of the two revolvers alleged in the superseding indictment is without a factual basis. Second, the district court’s jury instruction was sufficient to cure any prejudice resulting from any misjoinder of charges. See United States v. Bullock , 71 F.3d 171, 175 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1365 (1996).
AFFIRMED.
Before the First Division,

August 6, 1951

No. 55800.

petition 6495-R (Juneau, Alaska).

#### West Coast Grocery Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by First Division. The motion having been granted, the petition was dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

PLACE: Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE Washington, DC (12th floor) 
and virtual. Note: For those attending the meeting in person, current 
COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC 
COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on 
the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the 
contact page at https://www.fec.gov/contact/. If you would like to 
virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-
referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and 
corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting 
virtually, go to the Commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of 
General Counsel
Proposed Final Audit Report on Steve Daines for Montana (A21-04)
Draft Advisory Opinion 2023-06: Texas Majority PAC
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4c7d1d7c6d1c0d5c6cdf4d2d1d79ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2350464051465742515a634546400d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>, at least 72 hours prior to the 
meeting date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-23930 Filed 10-25-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/04/2011 05:06 PM 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

Hi Tom, 

Attached are the handouts we received at the EO 12866 meeting today. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

When: Friday, November 04, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern 

Time 

(US & Canada). 

Where: Room 9104 New Executive Office Building 

Janice Nolen, American Lung Association has requested this meeting. 

Toxic Air Report FINAL.PDF 

Final Report EH & E.PDF
¿No puede cumplir con 

sus pagos hipotecarios? 

¡Obtenga ayuda ahora mismo! 

A veces la vida trae acontecimientos inesperados que pueden tener un 

impacto sobre su bienestar financiero. Si está experimentando dificultades 

financieras y tiene problemas para pagar su hipoteca, hay ayuda disponible. 

■ Llámenos. Podemos analizar distintas opciones que pueden 

ayudarle a conservar su vivienda; estas incluyen una modificación 

en virtud del programa federal de Modificación Home Affordable. O, 

si usted ya no puede conservar su vivienda, podemos analizar otras 

alternativas a la ejecución hipotecaria que le permitan renunciar a su 

vivienda para lograr una mayor estabilidad financiera. 

■ Comuníquese con un asesor en asuntos de vivienda sin 

fines de lucro. Los asesores en asuntos de vivienda pueden 

ayudarle a organizar un plan de gastos para pagar su hipoteca 

y otros gastos mensuales, sin la necesidad inicial de nuestra 

intervención directa. Estos profesionales pueden también ayudarle 

a encontrar y aprovechar servicios o programas locales que 

proporcionen apoyo financiero y legal. Para buscar una organización 

de asesoría para viviendas aprobada por el Departamento de 

Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano (HUD, por sus siglas en inglés) 

de los EE. UU., visite www.hud.gov. 

Place your logo and contact 

information here.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Metro One Development, Inc, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATE: January 10, 2011


/s/ Stuart Turk
-----------------------------------------
Stuart Turk, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Executive Officer, President,
Chairman of the Board and Director



/s/ Evan Schwartzberg
-----------------------------------------
Evan Schwartzberg, Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32

    Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-KSB/A Annual Report of Xfone, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 20, 2004

By: /s/Guy Nissenson
Guy Nissenson
President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer
Document

CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN
As Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2015
THIRTEENTH INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT
Recitals:
1.Curtiss-Wright Corporation (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the Curtiss‐Wright Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”) and has caused the Plan to be amended and restated in its entirety effective as of January 1, 2015.
2.Subsequent to the most recent amendment and restatement of the Plan, the Company has decided to amend the Plan to provide a further, limited exception to the requirements for allocation of the Company’s non-elective contribution. 
3.Section 12.01(a) of the Plan permits the Company to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time.
4.Section 12.01(b) authorizes the Curtiss-Wright Corporation Administrative Committee to adopt Plan amendments on behalf of the Company under certain circumstances.
5.Certain of the Plan amendments described herein shall be subject to approval by the Board of Directors.
.Amendments to the Plan:
Effective March 1, 2020, Section 3.07A(a) is amended to delete the third sentence thereof and replace it with the following:
Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, an eligible Member who incurs a termination of employment on account of death, Disability or retirement on or after attainment of age 55 (or for the period beginning March 1, 2020 and ending December 31, 2020, a reduction in force initiative on or after attainment of age 55) and completion of at least 3 Years of Vesting Service prior to the end of any such Plan Year shall be entitled to an allocation of CW Savings Contributions and such allocation shall be based on the ratio that each such Member’s Compensation earned prior to his termination of employment bears to the total Compensation of all Members entitled to an allocation of CW Savings Contributions for the Plan Year.
Except to the extent amended by this Instrument of Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed on this ____ day of __________________, 2020.


						
		Curtiss-Wright Corporation
		Administrative Committee
		
	By:	
		Christopher J. McMahon
No. 64016.

protest 59/23924 (New York).

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Apparel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 17, 2008 and as amended by Amendment No. 1 as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008 and this Amendment No. 2 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof
(together, the Report), I, Dov Charney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2008                             
|                                                 
|/s/    Dov Charney                               
|Dov Charney President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 51289.

#### Protests 117822-K, etc., of J. A. Forrest Co. et al. (Duluth, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 53901.

#### Larry Lasker Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 804970-G (G), etc. (New York).

*331Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), JoMei Chang, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Vitria Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) hereby
certifies that, to the best of her knowledge, as follows:





The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has set her hand hereto as of this 14th day of November, 2002.





By:

/s/    JOMEI CHANG,
PH.D.JoMei Chang, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 53928.

#### Wing Yee Yuen Wah Kee & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 146460-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the products in question were not “pickled or salted,” and that the 1.55 percent of salt found therein “is naturally *341present- and has not been separately added.” Following Abstract 53684, which involved substantially the same class of merchandise, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00276-CR 

Terry Modric Small a/k/a Terrance L. 

Small 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 372nd District Court 

of Tarrant County (1397119D) 

October 6, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________ 

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
No. 56930.

#### B. Westergaard & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 180107-K (New York).

*398Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. Westergaard & Co.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 77, C. D. 1302), except that the merchandise in question has handles of nickel silver and that said knives are less than 4 inches in length, exclusive of the handle, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2011

p0321 

# Order

March 29, 2011

142181 & (79)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142181 COA: 288102 Wayne CC: 08-001845-FC WILLIAM EDWARD ARMOUR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 7, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

remand for a new trial is DENIED.

Z AHRA 

### , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-518
In Re: RONALD GRAHAM, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Graham, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Graham has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from this court forbidding certain judges andcourt personnel from further participation in any of Graham's lawsuits and directing that his cases henceforth be heard in Roanoke,Virginia. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Graham has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant Graham's application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argumentwold not aid the decisional process. We deny the motion to transfer, the motion to prevent certain judges from handling future cases, and the motion to be subpoenaed as a witness.

PETITION DENIED
No. 53431.

protests 143825-K/12997, etc. (New Orleans).

#### B. A. Ittmann *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the papers disclosed that no appeals for reappraisement were filed as provided in section 501, Tariff Act of 1930. It was held that the issue in question is one that should have been raised on the reap-praisement side of the court and that the court has no jurisdiction of the question of value sitting as a classification court. The protests were therefore dismissed.
No. P68/157.

protest 66/48834 (New York).

#### Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise covered by the foregoing protest are of plate or disc tumbler construction similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), wherein the court found that such locks should not be classified as locks of pin tumbler or cylinder construction, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
• 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 44 F 

Permit Conditions to Protect Human Health and the Environment 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

FEDERAL . ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV· STRIN· ER IN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 

PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS:
 

THE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM
 

SUBPART B - PERMIT APPLICATION
 

GENERAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS 

information for 

permit conditions 270.10(k) . 800(11) x 

• 

I 

I 

• . December 1, 1987 • Page 7 of 8