alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 08, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 08, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0336. CHARLES E. GRAPER v. GEORGIA BOARD OF DENTISTRY. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV312838
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 18

- 1880C (Filed: July 1 2 , 2019)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff

,

v.

THE UNITED STATES,

Defendant

,

and

AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.,

Intervenor

.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

Pending in this pre

- award bid protest are the parties’ cross

- motions for judgment on the administrative record

. The court held oral argument on the parties’ cross

- motions o n July 10, 2019

. Following argument, the court indicated to the parties that we would issue a n order stating our decision on the motions with a supporting opinion to follow shortly thereafter

. The court now orders the following

.

Because the court finds that Gate Criteria 1. 2 is enforceable, and

Oracle concedes that it c ould not meet that criteria at the time of proposal submission, we conclude that it cannot demonstrate prejudice as a result of other possible errors in th e procure ment process. We conclude as well that the contracting officer’s findings that an organizational conflict of interest does not exist and that individual conflicts of interest did not impact the

procurement were not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discr etion, or

otherwise not in accordance with law

. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the

administrative record is therefore denied

. Defendant’s and intervenor’s2 respective cross

- motions for judgment on the administrative record are granted.

Entry of fina l judgment is deferred pending the issuance of our supporting opinion.

s/Eric G. Bruggink

ERIC G. BRUGGINK Senior Judge
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

| 1.   | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:              April              16, 2007 | /s/                Asher Zwebner                                                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            | Asher                Zwebner, Chief Financial Officer (Principal                Financial Officer) |
|                                            |                                                                                               |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Christine Russell, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christine Russell                                               
|Christine Russell                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|August 8, 2008
MEMORANDUM

TO: Record

FROM: Lisa Biddle, U.S. EPA

DATE: March 31, 2015

SUBJECT: Information about Underground Injection for Disposal Wells in New York 

State (DCN SGE00726)

In November 2013, EPA Office of Water (EPA OW) communicated with EPA Region 2 

regarding Class II underground injection control wells (UICs) in New York State. EPA Region 2

reported the no UICs in New York are approved to take shale gas produced water. At the time of 

the correspondence (November 12, 2013) there were six permitted disposal wells in New York 

state, three that received fluids from gas storage operations and three that received fluids from 

conventional gas production wells.
October 28, 1953

No. 57584.

Suit 4695.

#### Eastman Kodak Company *v.*United States.

C. D. 1333 affirmed June 17, 1953. C. A. D. 539.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey
Staszak, Chief Executive Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the
4thday of May, 2010.



| |  |     |  |                        
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey Staszak    
| |  |     |  | Jeffrey Staszak        
| |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IB

Union Calendar No. 157

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57

[Report No. 106–262]

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade

relations treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 1999

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

JULY 26, 1999

Additional sponsors: Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr.

WOLF, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. STARK,

Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. HUNTER, Ms.

WOOLSEY, Mr. COOK, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. STEARNS, and Ms. MCKINNEY

JULY 26, 1999

Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to

the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of

the People’s Republic of China.
2

•HJ 57 RH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 3, 1999, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.

Union Calendar No. 157

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57

[Report No. 106–262]

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory

the products of the People’s Republic of China.treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to

JULY 26, 1999

Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and

printedHouse on the State of the Union, and ordered to beMeans, committed to the Committee of the Whole
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Preston W. Bair certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Home Loan Financial
Corporation, ("HLFC");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of HLFC as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. HLFC's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for HLFC and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to HLFC, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of HLFC's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in HLFC's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during HLFC's most recent fiscal
      quarter (HLFC's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, HLFC's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. HLFC's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to HLFC's
auditors and the audit committee of HLFC's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
            design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
            which are reasonably likely to adversely affect HLFC's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in HLFC's internal
            control over financial reporting.

/s/ Preston W. Bair
-----------------------------------
Preston W. Bair, Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 17, 2004

                                                                             35.
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holdea·, 

manufacturer, AT A, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Live TV LLC Paul Schneider (DER) 8/28/2014 Concur. 

Live TV LLC Oscar Hernandez 8/28/2014 Concur. 

Live TV LLC Ski Roblin 8/28/2014 Concur. 

Other/ Additional Information:
Case No. 8,334.

#### LEWIS et al. v. SPALDING.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 68.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1812.

Malicious Prosecution — Malice —Probable Cause.

In an action upon the case for maliciously conspiring to deprive the plaintiffs of their slave, it is necessary for lhem to prove malice in the defendant. And it is competent for the defendant to show probable cause, and the want of malice.

*501This was an action upon the case charging that the defendant, “unlawfully, wickedly, and maliciously,” conspired with divers ill-disposed persons to the plaintiffs unknown, to kidnap and carry off the slave of the plaintiffs, then in their peaceable possession; and in pursuance of such conspiracy, falsely and maliciously, by false pretences, procured a warrant to have the slave apprehended and delivered to the defendant; and hired persons to seize and carry away the slave out of the peaceable possession of the plaintiffs, for the lucre and gain of the defendant and to defraud the plaintiffs; and attempted to bribe persons to seize and carry away the slave, he the defendant thereby wickedly and maliciously keeping the plaintiffs in continual alarm and danger of having their said slave taken from them by force or fraud: by means of which unlawful conspiracy the plaintiffs were put to' great labor, expense, and trouble, in watching and protecting their said slave, and were deprived of his labor and hire, &c.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, contra)

was of opinion that it was necessary for the plaintiffs to prove malice in the defendant; and that it was competent for the defendant to show probable cause, by showing color of title, &c., and to disprove malice.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory J. Tibbitts, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CryoCor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007



/s/    GREGORY J.
TIBBITTSVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 5.02



                   [LETTERHEAD OF GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP]

                                 August 27, 1999







(303) 298-5700                                                     C 18591-00018



CSK Auto Corporation
645 East Missouri Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona  85012

         Re:      Registration Statement on Form S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We refer to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of CSK Auto Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), which are the subject of a registration statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Act"), which shares (the "Shares") may be offered and sold under the CSK Auto
Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").

         We have examined the original, or a photostatic or certified copy, of
such records of the Company, certificates of officers of the Company and of
public officials and such other documents as we have determined relevant and
necessary as the basis for the opinion set forth below. In such examination, we
have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all
documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to original documents of
all documents submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies and the
authenticity of the originals of such copies.

         Based upon our examination mentioned above, we are of the opinion that
the Shares have been validly authorized for issuance and, when (a) the
Registration Statement has become effective under the Act, (b) the Shares are
issued and sold in accordance with the terms set forth
<PAGE>   2
CSK Auto Corporation
August 27, 1999
Page 2



in the Registration Statement and in the Plan, including, in the case of Shares
issued pursuant to the exercise of options issued under the Plan, the payment
for the underlying Shares, and (c) the pertinent provisions of any applicable
state securities laws have been complied with, the Shares so issued will be
legally issued and will be fully paid and nonassessable.

         We consent to the filing of this opinion as an Exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm appearing on the cover
of the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we
are within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of
the Act or the General Rules and Regulations of the Commission.

                                                 Very truly yours,



                                                 /S/ GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of TAM of Henderson, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I,
Evagelina Esparza Barrza, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Evagelina Esparza Barrza
---------------------------
    Evagelina Esparza Barrza
    Director


Date  March 28, 2006
      --------------
No. 66170.

#### Canada Packers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/19148 and 60/19209 (Boston).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62941.

#### Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/9504 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belair Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
     31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Date:  May 10, 2005

                                  /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                  -----------------------
                                  Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                  Chief Executive Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the Fund  and will be  retained  by the Fund and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.