alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74198-74199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, PAR 20-103: Collaborative 
Program Grant for Multidisciplinary Teams (RM1), November 03, 2023, 
10:00 a.m. to November 03, 2023, 06:00 p.m., National Institutes of 
Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which 
was published in the Federal Register on October 05, 2023, 88 FR 69211, 
Doc 2023-22116.
    This meeting is being amended to change the meeting panel name to 
PAR 23-077: Collaborative Program Grant for Multidisciplinary Teams 
(RM1). The old name contains an old PAR number: PAR 20-103. The meeting 
is closed to the public.


[[Page 74199]]


     Dated: October 24, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-23811 Filed 10-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 79

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 16, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 17, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting in

5 lieu thereof ‘‘November 24, 1999’’. Public Law 106–46

6 is amended by striking ‘‘November 17, 1999’’ and insert7 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘November 24, 1999’’.

Æ
Report #:DOE/EIA-0554(2009)

Release date: March 2009

Next release date: March 2010



# Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009
##### 



SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan
 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice
 Company Plan Award
 Participant:Date of Grant:Number of Shares subject to the Award:Consideration:
    
    Participants services to the Company
 Vesting Schedule
 Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:
 Other Agreements:




---



##### 



Participant
    
    SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.By:Signature
    
    
    
    SignatureName:
    
    
    
    Name:Print
    
    
    
    PrintDate:
    
    
    
    Title:Date:
 Attachments




---



##### 



Attachment I
 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement




---



##### 



Attachment II
 2005 Equity Incentive Plan




---



##### 



SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan
 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement  Executive
 Grant
Notice Agreement Company Plan Common Stock Award
  1. Distribution of Shares of Common Stock provided, however Settlement Date provided further, Original Distribution
Date
 2. Consideration.
 3. Vesting




---



##### 



4. Number of Shares
 5. Conditions to Issuance and Delivery of Shares
 6. Execution of Documents.
 7. Non-transferability.
 8. Award Not a Service Contract
 9. Unsecured Obligation
 2.




---



##### 



10. Withholding Obligations
 (a)
 (b)
 11. Notices
 12. Headings .
 13. Amendment .
 14. Miscellaneous.
 (a)
 3.




---



##### 



(b)
 15. Governing Plan Document provided, however
 16. Effect on Other Employee Benefit Plans.
 17. Choice of Law .
 18. Severability.
 4.
No. 58414.

protest 206204-K (Boston).

#### F. W. Woolworth Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists -of novelty figures, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57018, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
State of the Markets Report • June 2005 111

PJM Electric Market Profile

Annual net revenue from energy for gas-fired technologies in

2004 was below the five-year average for the second consecutive

year. For a combined cycle, revenue from energy increased

1.1% from 2003 but was still 26.7% below the five-year average.

For a combustion turbine, revenue from energy reached a fiveyear low, declining from $9.76/kW-year in 2000 to $0.05/kWyear in 2004.

FERC estimated cumulative annual net revenue for sale of energy

at the PJM western trading hub. 

Estimates of the cost of new entry in PJM vary. For example,

PJM estimates were higher than the EIA-based estimates above:

$93.50/kW-year for a new combined cycle and $72.20/kW-year

for a new combustion turbine.7 In addition, the EIA-based cost

estimates do not provide a detailed picture of intrastate cost

divergence. According to a Strategic Energy Services Inc.

report, new-entry costs for a combustion turbine in New Jersey

are estimated at $72.21/KW-year, slightly lower than in

Maryland or Illinois at $74.12/kW-year and $73.84/kW-year,

respectively.8

Estimated PJM 2004 net energy revenues fell below all of these

thresholds. The addition of estimated net revenue from capacity made little difference. Without significant net revenue from

energy, capacity, and ancillary services, market-based investment was not signaled.

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

$ / kW-year

CC Net Revenue

CT Net Revenue

CC New Entry Costs

CT New Entry Costs

PJM Western Hub Net Revenue from Energy

Source: Derived from FERC/OMOI analysis of Energy Revenues; PJM MMU estimates

of capacity revenues as presented in May 4, 2005 State of the Markets. 

NET REVENUE

Net Energy Net Capacity Net Revenues 

$/kW - yr $/kW - yr $/kW - yr

CC $23.00 $5.24 $28.24

CT $0.04 $5.38 $5.42

Source: Derived from Platts and EIA data. See “Analytic Note on Net Revenue

Calculations” in the Other Material section for details. See also source note 10.

Regional Net Revenues from Energy and Capacity

Before integration, PJM was a net importer of energy. After

integration of the northern Illinois control area and continuing

with the integration of AEP and Dayton, PJM became a net

exporter. PJM was a net importer on five days after May 1 (June

16, November 21, December 5, December 6, and December 7).

Before ComEd integration on May 1, average net imports were

2,539 MW. May through September average net exports were

1,529 MW. After the AEP and Dayton integrations on October

1, average net exports were 1,811 MW.

Average Daily Net Interchange

-5,000

-4,000

-3,000

-2,000

-1,000

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

Jan

FebMar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Net Exports (MWh)

Source: Derived from PJM data. See source note 11.

REGIONAL EXPORTS AND IMPORTS

This insert reflects a corrected version of the above chart “Regional Net Revenues from Energy

and Capacity”. Both the table figures and the source note have been updated 10/06/05.
Bepoke Chief Judge Rao,

October 17, 1967

No. R67/115.

#### Sutton Creations, Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R65/12760, etc. (New York).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those in Lollytogs, *Ltd.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 608, Reap. Dec. 11073), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise (wearing apparel) and that such value was the appraised unit value, net packed, less the commission of Swedish Trading Co., Ltd., of Hong Kong as indicated on the invoices.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1069

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the memorialization

at the columbarium at Arlington National Cemetery of veterans who

have donated their remains to science, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mr. GOODLATTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the

memorialization at the columbarium at Arlington National Cemetery of veterans who have donated their remains to science, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1069 IH

1 SECTION 1. MEMORIALIZATION AT COLUMBARIUM AT AR2 LINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY OF VETER3 ANS WHO HAVE DONATED THEIR REMAINS

4 TO SCIENCE.

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO MEMORIALIZE.—(1) Chapter 24

6 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at

7 the end the following new section:

8 ‘‘§ 2412. Arlington National Cemetery: memorializa9 tion at columbarium of veterans who

10 have donated their remains to science

11 ‘‘The Secretary of the Army may honor, by marker

12 or other appropriate means at the columbarium at Arling13 ton National Cemetery, the memory of any veteran eligible

14 for inurnment in the columbarium whose cremated re15 mains cannot be inurned in the columbarium as a result

16 of the donation of the veteran’s organs or remains for

17 medical or scientific purposes.’’.

18 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of that

19 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following

20 new item:

‘‘2412. Arlington National Cemetery: memorialization at columbarium of veterans who have donated their remains to science.’’.

21 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Section 2412 of title 38, United

22 States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to

23 veterans who die on or after January 1, 1996.

Æ
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registration
Statement No. 33-60702 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account Ten on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of
our report dated February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account Ten relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
Exhibit 23.1 **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement (Form    S-8No. 333-131428)    pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, 2005 Equity    Incentive Plan, 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option    Plan and the 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of SGX    Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 17, 2006,    except paragraphs 3 and 4 of Note 11 as to which the date isMarch 27, 2006, with respect to the financial statements of SGX Pharmaceuticals,    Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form    10-K) for    the year ended December 31, 2005.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP     San Diego, California    March 28, 2006
Before the First Division,

April 3, 1961

No. 65371.

#### F. W. Woolworth Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/27534, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                [CITADEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT                                          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT:
Donna L. Heffner                                               Joseph N. Jaffoni
Chief Financial Officer                                        Stewart A. Lewack
Citadel Communications Corporation                Jaffoni & Collins Incorporated
Incorporated
602/731-5222                                                     212/835-8500 or
citc@jcir.com


                          CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANY
                         COMPLETES SENIOR NOTE PLACEMENT

TEMPE, Arizona, November 19, 1998 - Citadel Communications Corporation (Nasdaq:
CITC) today announced that its principal operating subsidiary, Citadel
Broadcasting Company, has completed the private placement of $115,000,000 of
9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008.

The notes were sold in a private placement transaction pursuant to Rule 144A and
Regulation S of the Securities Act, as amended. Citadel intends to use the net
proceeds of the offering to repay indebtedness, finance acquisitions and for
general corporate purposes.

The notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or any state
securities laws, and the notes may not be offered or sold in the United States
absent registration or an exemption from the registration requirements of such
laws.

Citadel is a radio broadcasting company that, upon completion of pending
transactions, will own or operate 82 FM and 37 AM radio stations concentrated in
22 mid-sized markets.

                                      # # #
No. 56286.

protest 177076-K (New York).

#### Cigogne, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

I,Andrew R. Speaker, certify that:

 

##### (1)  I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mercer Insurance Group, Inc.;

#####  

##### (2)  Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

#####  

##### (3)  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

#####  

##### (4)  The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

#####  

###### (i)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

######  

###### (ii)  evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

######  

###### (iii)  disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

######  

##### (5)  The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingequivalent functions):

#####  

###### (i)  all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

----

 

###### (ii)  any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

######  

| Dated: August 13,  2004 | By:                                   | /s/Andrew R. Speaker |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                         | Andrew R. Speaker,                    |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-042-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Installation new 

tubes 42.0

$3,570.0

0

$7,852 $11,422.00 82 $936,604.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $936,604

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 24-2 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 26 of 26
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS






         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (No. 333-97399) on Form S-8 of BUCS Financial Corp of our report dated
January 16, 2004, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of BUCS  Financial  Corp as of  December  31,  2003 and  2002,  and the  related
consolidated statements of operations,  changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the years then ended,  which  report  appears in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-KSB of BUCS Financial Corp.



                                                      /s/Stegman & Company






Baltimore, Maryland
March 29, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

WILLIAM J. KITSCH : NO. 03-594

 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2008, upon

consideration of the defendant's motion to return property (docket

entry # 135), to which the Government has not filed a response,

and the Court finding that:

(a) The defendant moves for return of his property

under R. Crim. Proc. 41(g), under which "[a] person aggrieved

 . . . by the deprivation of property may move for the property's

return";

(b) The Government seized the firearms, ammunition, and

body armor identified in the defendant's motion around the time it

arrested the defendant for criminal charges related to these

items;

(c) A jury acquitted the defendant of those criminal

charges on October 9, 2008;

(d) Following the jury's acquittal of the defendant,

the Government has no legitimate reason to continue to deprive

defendant of his property;

(e) Although the defendant cannot lawfully possess the

firearms, ammunition, or body armor the Government seized, he has

requested that the Government return the property to his son,

William Kitsch, IV;

Case 2:03-cr-00594-SD Document 136 Filed 11/10/08 Page 1 of 2
2

(f) There is no reason to believe that it would be

unlawful for William Kitsch, IV, to possess firearms, ammunition,

and body armor; and 

(g) There is no indication that the Government or the

Court will require use of the items seized from the defendant for

future proceedings;

It is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. The defendant's motion is GRANTED; and 

2. The Government shall RETURN the firearms,

ammunition, and body armor identified in the defendant's motion to

defendant's son, William Kitsch, IV.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J.

Case 2:03-cr-00594-SD Document 136 Filed 11/10/08 Page 2 of 2