alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Qi Shaofeng, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals; 

c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and

d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting: and 

5.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
1. Domestic Preferences 

2. Contract Language 

3. Waivers 

Build America, Buy America Act 

Three Key Requirements 

Recipients and subrecipients may request a waiver from FEMA 

if the circumstances meet the criteria for an allowable waiver 

type. The allowable waiver types include nonavailability, 

unreasonable cost, and public interest. Follow the steps and 

checklist outlined in the BABAA Best Practices Guide to 

ensure timely review of the waiver request. 

Contracts must include a contract provision explaining the 

BABAA requirements and a self-certification of compliance 

with the domestic preference requirements. Consult the Buy 

America Preference in FEMA Financial Assistance Programs 

for Infrastructure, FEMA Interim Policy #207-22-0001 for 

more information and sample language. 

For more information about BABAA requirements, visit the “Buy America” Preference page on FEMA.gov. 

The Build America, Buy America Act (BABAA) requires recipients and subrecipients of 

certain FEMA financial assistance programs to follow three key requirements for their 

infrastructure projects:

Recipients and subrecipients must ensure that all 

iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction 

materials used in their infrastructure projects are 

produced in the United States.
Before the Second Division,

December 27, 1944

No. 49915.

#### Protest 2781-K(b) of O. Yoshizawa Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items are hats known as harvest hats valued at less than $3 per dozen, similar to those involved in *Caradine Hat Co. v. United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith certain of the items in question were held dutiable at 12J4 percent under paragraph 1504(b) (5) and T. D. 48075, as claimed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|I, Brian Fiddler, certify that:
|-------------------------------
|                               
|1.                             
|                               
|2.                             
|                               
|3.                             
|                               
|4                              
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|5.                             
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               

Date: April 28, 2014

|Brian
      Fiddler                                                                               | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Signature: Brian Fiddler                                                                            | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer
      and Principal Accounting Officer) | 

---
No. 55088.

#### Murray R. Bowdan & Company *v.*United States,

protest 162487-K. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record disclosing nothing that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Stanley Herdman, Chief Financial Officer of San Telmo Energy Ltd., (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 31, 2005



Signed:  /s/  Stanley Herdman

Stanley Herdman

Chief Financial Officer













#
#### [Protective Life and Annuity Company Letterhead]

## Exhibit 32(a)

#### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne E.
Stuenkel, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Wayne E. Stuenkel
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 14, 2003

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>   1
 
                              THE DIAL CORPORATION
 
                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
        The Freeman Cosmetic Corporation
        Nuevo Federal, S.A.
        Industrias Corporativas Diversificadas, S.A.
        Dial Benefits Management Corporation
        Dial Brands, Inc.
        Sarah Michaels, Inc.
        Armour International Company
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Energy Corporation a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Fu Xu, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ Fu XuFu XuChief Financial OfficerDate: March 16, 2009

---
No. 51251.

#### Protests 121869-K, etc., of A. & S. Bianco Co. et al. (New York).

*167Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese, similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 12-10387 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 Agency No. A094-873-358

MARTHA ZULEMA BALBUENA CONSTANTINI, 

MARTHA CELINDA BALBUENA, 

Petitioners,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

________________________

 Petition for Review of a Decision of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

 ________________________

(August 10, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-10387 Date Filed: 08/10/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
Martha Zulema Balbuena Constantini and her daughter, Mariana Celinda

Balbuena, are both Venezuelan citizens. On January 23, 2012, they filed a petition

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) denial of their motion

for reconsideration of its July 29, 2011, final order of removal affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) order of removal. The petitioners assert the BIA and IJ

both erred in denying asylum, withholding of removal under the Immigration and

Nationality Act, and withholding of removal under the United Nations Convention

Against Torture because: (1) the BIA and IJ both made improper findings

regarding credibility; (2) the BIA and IJ both improperly found the petitioners did

not sufficiently corroborate their claims; (3) the IJ improperly found relief was

barred by the doctrine of firm resettlement; and (4) the IJ improperly denied relief

as a matter of discretion.

We review our subject-matter jurisdiction de novo. Sanchez Jimenez v. U.S.

Att’y Gen., 492 F.3d 1223, 1231 (11th Cir. 2007). Although we generally have

jurisdiction to consider final orders of removal, a petitioner must file a petition for

review no later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal. 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(1), (b)(1). This 30-day time limit is mandatory and jurisdictional, and is

not subject to equitable tolling. Dakane v U.S. Att’y Gen., 399 F.3d 1269, 1272

n.3 (11th Cir. 2005). Moreover, the filing of a motion to reconsider does not

2

Case: 12-10387 Date Filed: 08/10/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
suspend or toll the deadline for filing a petition for review of the BIA’s final order

of removal. See id.

We do not have jurisdiction over the petitioners’ claims, which challenge

the BIA’s final order of removal, because they filed their petition for review more

than 30 days after the date of the BIA’s order. The petitioners have not presented

any argument that the BIA abused its discretion by denying their motion for

reconsideration, and they have, therefore, abandoned the issue. See Calle v. U.S.

Att’y Gen., 504 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007) (reviewing BIA’s denial of 

motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion); Sepulveda v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 401

F.3d 1226, 1228 n.2 (11th Cir. 2005) (stating petitioner abandons any issue on

which she fails to present argument on appeal). Accordingly, we dismiss the

petition for review in part, and deny it in part.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.

3

Case: 12-10387 Date Filed: 08/10/2012 Page: 3 of 3
Exhibit 12.1 Certification of CEO required by Rule 13a-14(a)  Certifications I, Steven R. Garman, certify that: 1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of QI Systems Inc. (the company); 2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.             The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and 5.             The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 30, 2005  Steven R. GarmanName: Steven R. GarmanTitle: President and Principal Executive Officer
No. 65360.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 265806-K (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.11


                             CONSENT OF KENNETH LEVY

         In connection with this Registration Statement on Form S-4, the
undersigned hereby consents to the naming by the Registrant of the undersigned
as director designee of the combined company. In giving such consent, the
undersigned does not thereby admit that he comes within the category of persons
whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 or the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.


Phoenix, Arizona                        INTEGRATED PROCESS EQUIPMENT CORP.
February 3, 1999

                                        /s/ Kenneth Levy
                                        _____________________________
                                        Kenneth Levy, Director
No. 54498.

#### American Cyanamid Co. and C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 138192-K and 144608-K (Buffalo).

*230Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the

court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2010



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 71 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 71

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 71

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 106-62 is amended by striking ``October 21, 1999'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``October 29, 1999''. Notwithstanding section 106 of 
Public Law 106-62, funds shall be available and obligations for 
mandatory payments due on or about November 1, 1999, may continue to be 
made.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```