alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAFAYETTE MILLER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 508 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of February, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      annual report of Affinity Media International Corp. fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Affinity Media International
      Corp.




Date:
      March 31, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Peter H. EngelPeter
                H. EngelChairman
                and CEO
              (Principal
                executive officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Media International Corp. and
      will
      be retained by Affinity Media International Corp. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 55120.

#### The Chapal Donner Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 130225-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 5

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing

the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of desecration of the

flag of the United States and to set criminal penalties for that act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of desecration of the flag of the United

States and to set criminal penalties for that act.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 5 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘The Congress and the States shall have power to

5 prohibit the act of desecration of the flag of the United

6 States and to set criminal penalties for that act.’’.

Æ
No. 55812.

Suit 4678.

#### United States *v.*Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.

C. D. 1301. (Appeal dismissed June 5,1951.)
Exhibit
13.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned officer of Given Imaging Ltd. (the "Company") hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge that:
 
 (i)    the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
 
 (ii)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 26, 2010
 
 /s/ Nachum
Shamir
 Nachum
Shamir
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
¡Evite la ejecución hipotecaria 

hoy mismo! 

Presentado por 

Your Name Here 

Place your logo and contact 

information here. 
A veces la vida trae acontecimientos inesperados 

que pueden provocar dificultades financieras. 

Si ha tenido dificultades para pagar su hipoteca o 

cree que puede tener problemas financieros en el 

futuro próximo, podemos ayudarle. Podemos analizar 

distintas soluciones para evitar la ejecución hipotecaria 

que pueden ayudarle a conservar su vivienda, incluida 

una modificación en virtud del programa federal de 

Remodelación de Viviendas Asequibles. Si conservar su 

vivienda no es la mejor opción, evaluaremos distintas 

alternativas a la ejecución hipotecaria que le permitan 

renunciar a su vivienda sin pasar por el proceso de 

ejecución hipotecaria. Finalmente, queremos ayudarles 

a usted y a su familia a encontrar una solución que 

estabilice su situación financiera y de vivienda actual.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Wireless Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Brad Woods, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ BRAD WOODS
-------------------------------
Brad Woods
Interim President, Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

p0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146526

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146526

COA: 310860

Midland CC: 11-004759-FH

STEPHEN PAUL VAUGHN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Before the Third Division,

November 10, 1958

No. 62436.

#### Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 322365-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marianne Duhaterova, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Marianne Duhaterova
------------------------
Marianne Duhaterova
Chief Financial Officer
February 28, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







The
      Board
      of Directors




Given
      Imaging Ltd.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      333-145474, 333-134739, 333-118473, 333-107630 and 333-73732) on Form S-8 of
      Given Imaging Ltd. (the “Company”) of our report dated March 31, 2008, with
      respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries
      as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
      operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years
      in the three year period ended December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which report
      appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 20-F of the Company.





Our
      report refers to the adoption by the Company of Statement of Financial
      Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment, *”* and the
      FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
      Taxes,” effective January 1, 2006 and 2007 respectively.








/s/
      Somekh Chaikin


Somekh
      Chaikin


Certified
      Public Accountants (Israel)


Member
      firm of KPMG International




Tel-Aviv,
      Israel


March
      31,
      2008
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MARTIN AKERMAN,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent

______________________

2024

- 132

______________________

On Petition for Permission to Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC

- 1221

- 22

- 0257

- W

- 2.

______________________

ON PETITION AND MOTION

______________________

Before S TOLL

, C UNNINGHAM , and S TARK

, Circuit Judges

.

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

Martin Akerman petitions for permission for interlocutory appeal from a May 31, 2024 Acknowledgement Order issued by an administrative judge of the Merit Systems
Protection Board. Mr. Akerman also moves to hold the petition in abeya nce , ECF No. 4, and objects to the caption, ECF No. 5. We deny the petition and the motions. Case: 24-132 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2024AKERMAN v. ARMY 2

The May 31, 2024 order is the administrative judge ’ s acknowledgement of the refiling of Mr. Akerman ’ s appeal following dismissal subject to automatic reinstatemen t. In that order, the administrative judge denied a request forjoinder of the National Guard and reiterated previous rulings as to the scope of the appeal and extent of permitted discovery. Mr. Akerman’s petition here asks this court to

reverse those as pects of the May 31, 2024 order.

In matters from the Board, t his court’s jurisdiction is generally limited to “an appeal from a final order or final decision,” 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9) (emphases added), and

“ an order is final only when it ends the litigation on themerits and leaves nothing for the [tribunal] to do but execute the judgment,” Weed v. Social Sec. Admin. , 571 F.3d 1359, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (cleaned up). The May 31, 2024 order clearly does not resolve the merits of Mr. Akerman’s appeal before the Board , which remains pending . And Mr.
Akerman has not identified, and the court is not aware of, any basis for this court’s immediate , interlocutory review
of the administrative judge ’s order under the circumstances

. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The petition and all pending motions are denied.

Ju ly 5 , 2024
Date F OR THE C OURT Case: 24-132 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 07/05/2024
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 41

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative

to equal rights for men and women.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mrs. MALONEY of New York introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relative to equal rights for men and women.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States:
2

•HJ 41 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Equality of rights under the law shall

3 not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any

4 State on account of sex.

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to

6 enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this

7 article.

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. This amendment shall take effect two

9 years after the date of ratification.’’.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
 promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JESSE ZOOK, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-cv-4080

MARIO SIROIS :

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 29th day of October, 2002,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Lynn Meyer 

 Deputy Clerk

cc: Eric Swan, Esquire (mail)

O:\41(b) Orders to Dismiss\Zook v. Sirois 02-4080 - 41.1B - New.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-04080-MMB Document 4 Filed 10/29/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Dragon International
Group Corp. on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Xiali Gan,
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


November 15, 2005
                              By: /s/ Xiali Gan
                   Xiali Gan,CFO and Chief Accounting Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.209

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
APPENDIX B
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
OF ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
Accounts Not Earned and Vested On or Before December 31, 2004
 (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2009)
WHEREAS, Erie Indemnity Company (the “Company”) maintains the Deferred Compensation Plan of Erie Indemnity Company (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, Article 4 of the Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan; and 
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend Appendix B to the Plan to remove Article 5.4(a) of Appendix B to the Plan which allows the Company to delay a payment of nonqualified deferred compensation to the extent that the Company reasonably anticipates that the payment would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 due to changes in how that provision is applied; and
WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the aforementioned amendment by resolution on December 8, 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends in its entirety, Article 5.4(a) of Appendix B to the Plan as follows, effective as of December 31, 2020:
a)    [Intentionally Omitted]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed this 24th day of December, 2020.
						
		ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
		
	ATTEST:	
		
	/s/ Brian W. Bolash
	By:  /s/ Timothy NeCastro

		
		Title:  President and CEO
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75540-75541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24358]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2154]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 128 Under Alternative Site 
Framework

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:

[[Page 75541]]

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Board to grant to qualified 
corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or 
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
zones;
    Whereas, the Lummi Indian Business Council, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 128, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-32-
2023, docketed May 9, 2023) for authority to reorganize under the ASF 
with a service area that includes all Lummi Nation property which 
encompasses the Lummi Indian Reservation plus all property owned by the 
Lummi Nation outside the exterior boundaries of the Lummi Indian 
Reservation, in and adjacent to the Bellingham Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, and FTZ 128's existing Site 1 would be 
categorized as a magnet site;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (88 FR 30718, May 9, 2023) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiners' report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 128 under the ASF is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including section 
400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone.

    Dated: October 30, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-24358 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
No. 52813.

#### Eugene Gray *v.*United States,

protest 141057-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.4


                                    GUARANTEE


                  The undersigned, Target Directories of Michigan, Inc. (the
"Guarantor") hereby unconditionally guarantees, on a senior subordinated basis,
jointly and severally with all other guarantors under the Indenture dated as of
May 23, 2001 by and among TransWestern Publishing Company LLC, a Delaware
limited partnership (the "Company"), TWP Capital Corp. II, a Delaware
corporation ("Capital" and, together with the Company, the "Issuers"), the
Guarantor named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (as amended,
restated or supplemented from time to time, the "Indenture"), to the extent set
forth in the Indenture and subject to the provisions of the Indenture, (a) the
due and punctual payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest
on the Notes, whether at maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, the due and
punctual payment of interest on overdue principal of, and premium, if any, and
interest on the Notes, to the extent lawful, and the due and punctual
performance of all other obligations of the Issuers to the Noteholders or the
Trustee, all in accordance with the terms set forth in Article 10 of the
Indenture, and (b) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any
Notes or any of such other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in
full when due or performed in accordance with the terms of the extension or
renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise.

                  The obligations of the Guarantor to the Noteholders and to the
Trustee pursuant to this Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth in
Article 10 of the Indenture and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for
the precise terms and limitations of this Guarantee.

                                        Target Directories of Michigan, Inc.,
                                            as Guarantor

                                        By:         /s/ Joan M. Fiorito
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:   Joan M. Fiorito
                                            Title:  Vice President - Chief
                                                    Financial Officer