alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101949 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate
Account Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of Hartford Life
and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory financial statements as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of our report dated February 21,
2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate Account Seven
relating to the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of
such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings
"Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to
Registration Statement No. 333-36138 of Hartford Life Insurance Company
Separate Account Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated February 19, 2003 of
Hartford Life Insurance Company relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and of our report dated
February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account Seven
relating to the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of
such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings
"Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
Filed by Automated Filing Serivces Inc. (604) 609-0244 - K-Tronik International Corp. - Exhibit 10.16






  	Person in Charge: 

        Reviewed by: 

        Approved by: 


  



	For Limit Trade Purpose


 Limit Increase Additional Agreement

  April 24, 2001

 To Hanvit Bank 

 656 Mynhyeong-ri, Opo-myeon, Gwanggu-si, Gyeonggi-do

  K-Tronik Asia Corp. 

  


  Contractor: Taewoong Chung 

    Address:

    Tel ( ) -

   Joint Surety: Taewoong Chung

    Address: 111-1601, Lotte APT, Guro5-dong, Guro, Seoul

    Tel ( ) 

   Joint Surety: 

    Address 

    Tel ( ) 



 I confirm as below with adding to the (Credit) Trade Agreement agreed on Feb
  28, 2001. 

 Amount increased       
  Two Hundred Fifty Million WON 

 Hanvit Bank
Exhibit 10.1


 


	
  

  	
  THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET

  9600 BLACKWELL ROAD, SUITE 300

  ROCKVILLE, MD 20850

  



 


By
Facsimile and First Class Mail


 


October 2, 2003


 


Mr. Ralph M. Norwood


Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

SatCon Technology Corporation


161 First Street


Cambridge, MA 02142


 


	
  Re:

  	
   

  	
  SatCon Technology
  Corporation (“Satcon” or the “Company”)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Nasdaq Symbol: SATC

  



 


Dear Mr. Norwood:


 


On August 14, 2003, Staff notified the
Company that it did not comply with the minimum $10,000,000 stockholders’
equity requirement under Maintenance Standard 1 for continued listing on The
Nasdaq National Market, as set forth in Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(3).  Based on Staff’s further review of the
Company and its plan of compliance dated September 10, 2003, Staff has
determined that SatCon currently meets all continued listing requirements under
Maintenance Standard 2, as set forth in Marketplace Rule 4450(b).  Accordingly, the Company complies with the
quantitative requirements for continued listing and this matter is now closed.


 


If you have any questions, please contact
Adam Foulke, Listing Analyst, at (301) 978-8029.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Cynthia T. Melo

  	
   

  
	
  Cynthia T. Melo

  
	
  Director

  
	
  Listing Qualifications
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1094 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1094

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to broaden the range of discount window 
    loans which may be used as collateral for Federal reserve notes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the third sentence 
of the second undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal 
Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 412) is amended by striking ``acceptances 
acquired under the provisions of section 13 of this Act'' and inserting 
``acceptances acquired under section 10A, 10B, 13, or 13A of this 
Act''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 76-5923.

#### Lane *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**AMERICAN
      TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 30, 2005 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
      N. Plamondon, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.


December
              20, 2005*/S/
              WILLIAM N. PLAMONDON, III**WILLIAM
              N. PLAMONDON, III**CHIEF
                EXECUTIVE
                OFFICER*
Case 2:06-cv-01100-JLR Document 41 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-01100-JLR Document 41 Filed 09/21/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

THERMION, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

THERMION METALIZING SYSTEMS,

LTD.,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5409FDB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

Plaintiff Thermion, Inc. moves to compel discovery and details the particular requests for

admission, production, and interrogatories at issue. TMS opposes the motion to compel and details

what it has produced as well as arguing that certain requests for admission involving the application

of law to fact are inappropriate. 

On the record shown, the Court concludes that Defendant Thermion Metalizing Systems,

Ltd. has properly responded and will supplement the record as necessary. ACCORDINGLY, 

IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff Thermion, Inc.’s Motion To Compel Discovery [Dkt. # 69] is

DENIED. 

DATED this 18th day of July, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05382-FDB Document 2 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 53888.

#### Ellis Silver Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64760-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 65342.

#### American Machine & Foundry Co., Hercules Division, et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/19753, etc. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT      32 **

|                                |                                                                                                     |                                   |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date:                March 23, 2007 | By:                                                                                            | /s/ Richard              S. Foote |
|                                | **Richard                S. Foote**                                                                      |
|                                | **President                and Chief Executive Officer****(Principal                Executive Officer)** |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                            |                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                                                                                                   | /s/ R.                Bradley Forth |
|   | **R.                  Bradley Forth**                                                                                                                                           |
|   | **Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary****(Principal                  Financial                  Officer)**  |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [CERCLA-04-2024-7001, FRL-11528-01-R4]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed settlement.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to enter into an Administrative Settlement Agreement for Remedial Design/Remedial Action by Prospective Purchaser with Cone Mills Acquisition Group, LLC, concerning the U.S. Finishing, LLC and Cone Mills Corporation Superfund Site. The settlement agreement addresses a Remedial Design/Remedial Action to be performed at the site by Cone Mills Acquisition Group, LLC, a Prospective Purchaser.

# DATES:

The Agency will consider public comments on the proposed settlement until December 4, 2023. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the proposed settlements if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the proposed settlements are available from the Agency by contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, using the contact information provided in this notice. Comments may also be submitted by referencing the Site's name through one of the following methods:

*Internet: https://www.epa.gov/​aboutepa/​about-epa-region-4-southeast#r4-public-notices.*

*Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

Maurice Horsey,

Branch Manager, Enforcement Branch, Superfund & Emergency Management Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-24204 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

s0324 

# Order

Clerk 

### March 28, 2014

148211

STEPHEN LYTTLE,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 148211

AGC: 2195

- 13

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and

relief is DENIED, because the Court is not per suaded that it should grant the requested

relief.
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to Registration
Statement No. 33-80738 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account Three
on Form N-4, of our report dated February 19, 2003 of Hartford Life Insurance
Company relating to the financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and of our report dated February 21, 2003 of
Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account Three relating to the financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the
Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
                    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT
                    ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                    REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

   <MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                               <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
   <PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
   <PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
   <CASH>                                                9,694
   <SECURITIES>                                        652,424
   <RECEIVABLES>                                         7,554
   <ALLOWANCES>                                              0
   <INVENTORY>                                               0
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
   <PP&E>                                                    0
   <DEPRECIATION>                                            0
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      669,672
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               493,458
   <BONDS>                                                   0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
   <PREFERRED>                                               0
   <COMMON>                                            303,584
   <OTHER-SE>                                        (127,370)
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        669,672
   <SALES>                                                   0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     43,842
   <CGS>                                                     0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4,714
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   18,661
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                      20,467
   <INCOME-TAX>                                              0
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  20,467
   <DISCONTINUED>                                            0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
   <CHANGES>                                                 0
   <NET-INCOME>                                         20,467
   <EPS-BASIC>                                          0.99
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.99


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 62 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 62

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change between Georgia 
                          and South Carolina.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 62

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change between Georgia 
                          and South Carolina.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSENT OF CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The consent of Congress is given to the 
establishment of the boundary between the States of Georgia and South 
Carolina.
    (b) New Boundary.--The boundary referred to in subsection (a) is 
the boundary--
            (1) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act Number 1044 
        (S.B. No. 572) approved by the Governor on April 5, 1994, and 
        agreed to by the State of South Carolina in Act Number 375 
        (S.B. No. 1315) approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996;
            (2) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act Number 1044 
        (S.B. No. 572) approved by the Governor on April 5, 1994, and 
        agreed to by the State of South Carolina in an Act approved by 
        its Governor not later than 5 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this joint resolution;
            (3) agreed to by the State of South Carolina in Act Number 
        375 (S.B. No. 1315) approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996, 
        and agreed to by the State of Georgia in an Act approved by its 
        Governor not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment 
        of this joint resolution; or
            (4) agreed to by the States of Georgia and South Carolina 
        in Acts approved by each of their Governors not later than 5 
        years after the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.
    (c) Compact.--The Acts referred to in subsection (b) are recognized 
by Congress as an interstate compact pursuant to section 10 of article 
I of the United States Constitution.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 49904.

#### Protest 109961-K of Lenart Import, Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the hearing a sample was introduced in evidence. This sample has been converted into an earring by the removal of the shank and the substitution of a sterling clip. A designer connected with the plaintiff company testified she was familiar with the importation in question and that the button introduced in evidence was one of the 141 pieces involved. It was conceded in open court that the buttons are embossed. On the record presented and following *United States*v. *Bailey*(30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237) the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08460

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3Description

x 08460\08460_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08460\08460_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 08460\08460_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08460\08460_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08460\08460_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08460\08460_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08460\08460_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08460\08460_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08460\08460_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08460\08460_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08460\Certification Statement Plant ID 08460.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08460\Supplemental Documents\08460_Cape Fear A5-2 Aerial Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08460\Supplemental Documents\08460_Cape Fear A5-2 Aerial Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08460\Supplemental Documents\08460_Cape Fear A5-2 Aerial Map 3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08460\Supplemental Documents\08460_Cape Fear A5-3 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08460\Supplemental Documents\08460_Cape Fear D3-1 Pond-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08460\Supplemental Documents\08460_Cape Fear D3-1 Pond-2 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08460\Supplemental Documents\08460_Cape Fear F5-6 GW Monitoring Wells Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 41 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 41

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1999

  Mrs. Maloney of New York introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the 
date of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```