alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.19


                          AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT

         Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated
as of December 22, 1996 (the "Option Agreement"), between IRA B. LAMPERT (the
"Optionee") and Concord Camera Corp. ("Concord"), as the same was amended and
restated as of December 22, 1996 in connection with that certain letter
agreement dated September 19, 2002, pursuant to which Option Agreement the
Optionee has an option (the "Option") to purchase 387,000 shares (adjusted to
reflect the two-for-one split of Concord's common stock effected April 14, 2000
and all exercises made before July 31, 2001 under the original option agreement
dated as of December 22, 1996) of Concord's no par common stock (the "Common
Stock").

         FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Option Agreement is hereby amended, effective
as of February 11, 2003 to permit the Optionee to elect to defer the delivery of
the Common Stock he would acquire pursuant to an exercise of the Option. Any
such deferral will be subject to the terms and conditions of Concord's Deferred
Delivery Plan (the "Plan"), a copy of which has been provided separately, and,
when purchasing Option Shares pursuant to the Plan, the payment provisions of
the Plan will apply instead of the provisions in Section 8 of the Option
Agreement regarding methods for payment of the Purchase Price.

         Unless otherwise provided herein, all capitalized terms shall have the
meaning assigned to such terms in the Option Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.

                                          Concord Camera Corp.


                                          By:    /s/ Brian F. King
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Brian F. King
                                               Senior Executive Vice President


                                          OPTIONEE:

                                            /s/ Ira B. Lampert
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Ira B. Lampert
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Jeffrey L. Wilner v. Andres Quijano & Osmaldo Marquez

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00322

- CV

Trial court case number: 200 9

- 40972

Trial cou rt: 11th District Court of Harris County , Texas

Date motion filed : March 19, 2013

Party filing motion : Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is (X ) DENIED ( ) GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting individually x Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown

Date: May 3, 2013
No. 50285.

#### Protests 64757-K, etc., of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Ir accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v.. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the-invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 53864.

#### The Babs Shop et al. *v.*United States,

protests 65347-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   796
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,167,426
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,543
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,964,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               404,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (422,944)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.030)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.030)


</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1023 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 Private Calendar No. 8
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1023

                          [Report No. 106-403]

                For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1999

 Mr. Metcalf introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 20, 1999

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
                For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The limitations set forth in sections 6511 and 
6514(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to period of 
limitation on filing claim and on allowance of credits or refunds for 
tax overpayment) shall not apply to a claim filed by Richard W. 
Schaffert of Lincoln, Nebraska, for credit or refund of an overpayment 
of the individual Federal income tax Richard W. Schaffert paid for the 
taxable year 1983.
    (b) Deadline.--Subsection (a) shall apply only if Richard W. 
Schaffert submits a claim pursuant to such subsection within the 1-year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                     





                                                 Private Calendar No. 8

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1023

                          [Report No. 106-403]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 20, 1999

       Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Goodman Networks Incorporated 

(as of March 28, 2014) 

 

| Subsidiary                             |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Minnesota Digital Universe, Inc.       |   | Minnesota                     |
| Multiband Corporation                  |   | Minnesota                     |
| Multiband EWM, Inc.                    |   | Texas                         |
| Multiband EWS, Inc.                    |   | Texas                         |
| Multiband Field Services, Incorporated |   | Delaware                      |
| Multiband MDU Incorporated             |   | Delaware                      |
| Multiband Special Purpose, LLC         |   | Minnesota                     |
| Multiband Subscriber Services, Inc.    |   | Minnesota                     |

The preceding list excludes all subsidiaries of Goodman Networks Incorporated, which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a “significant subsidiary” as defined under Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, and are therefore omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(21) of Regulation S-K.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H.

of the Smithsonian Institution.Gray as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H. Gray

as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat-
2

•HJ 27 EH

1 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

2 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

3 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

4 reason of the expiration of the term of Dr. Hanna H. Gray

5 of Illinois on April 11, 1999, is filled by the reappointment

6 of the incumbent for a term of six years, effective April

7 12, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 61708.

#### D. C. Andrews & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 306970-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 62956.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/10082 (Seattle).

*348Opinion by

Rao, J.

When this case was called for trial, it was stipulated that the only items repaired in Canada were the engines and that no portion of the power saws had been repaired. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *George S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*41 C.C.P.A. 33, C.A.O. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51258.

#### Protests 35743-K, etc., of Haddad & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
Exhibit 34.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Members of the Company

Goal Financial, LLC:

We have examined managements assessment,
included in the accompanying Managements Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Managements Assessment), that Goal Financial, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for asset-backed security transaction issued subsequent to January 1, 2006 (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vi), 1122(d)(3)(iii),
1122(d)(4)(i)-(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Managements assessment
identifies the individual asset-backed transaction and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected
the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements
assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP          
|Costa Mesa, California
|March 15, 2007
President Pete Derenale UFCW#5 Yice Presiden_ts Rita Magner SMW#104 G. Anthony Phillips IATSE #16 Brenda Mattson OPEIU #3 Jennifer LaRiviere SEIU #102 1 Stephen Lewis OE#3 Corey Penrose VTA Ken Miller Iron Workers #378 Renita Cogburn SEIU #1021 Treasurer Mahdis Fathi OPEIU #29 Trustees Dan Collins UFCW#5 Pam Budge CSEA#184 Brett Risley SMW#104 Sam Green NALC # 1111 Executive Director Jon Riley


### S10-150507-010 

# NAPA-SOLANO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL April30 ,2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation "Supporting Working Families"

US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary Foxx: As a longtime union member and passionate advocate for workers , I feel compelled to add my voice to the many calling for the United States Government to take action against unfair competitive and labor practice by like Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline. Many of my fellow union members face job losses ifAmerican carriers continue to lose market share to heavily subsidized airlines like Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline. With more than $42 billion subsidies and other unfair benefits fTom the governments of Qatar and the United Arab Em irates (UAE), these carriers can offer fares that are far below the market norms , thereby giving them an unfair advantage over other carriers that fly the same routes-and violating Open Skies policy. This has real ramifications for U.S. carriers and their employees: every international roundtrip flight lost by a U.S. airline results in a net loss of 821 U.S. jobs. The airlines that fly in and out of my local airport, San Franci sco International , provide thousands of well-paying , steady jobs for people in the Bay Area
- and many thousands more in communities across the country. We need the U.S. government to protect those jobs and to take a stand against the se governments' actions . I urge you to open consultations with the governments of Qatar and the UAE to voice your objections to these unfair practices and seek a freeze on new capacity from the Gulfcarriers to the U.S. while the consultations go forward. Sincerely ,

Jon Riley Executive Director 2540 N. Watney Way, Fairfield , CA 94533 707.373.5250 www .napaso l a nocl c .o rg

# (
I

# l NAPA
-SOLANO CENTRAl lABOR COUNCIL, Afl-CIO 2540 N
. WATNEY WAY FAIRFIELD , CA 94533**~**.... ··1



# s 10-150507-010**O.z~KtAND** CA 945 01 MAY 2015 PN 3 l

,, i·h 1 iii i

## i • i''

## ii , ,, i• 1 i ii iiii 

## uii 1 i•

i; 

## i• l; 

### i• iii Pi 

### i I' i''Iii 1 iii
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey Staszak, Chief Executive Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 31st day of July, 2007.         By: /s/ Jeffrey Staszak    Jeffrey Staszak         Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofVolterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



 As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion in this
Form 10-K of our report dated September 3, 1998, and to all references to our
Firm included in this Form 10-K



                                                   Arthur Andersen LLP


 Minneapolis, Minnesota
 September 28, 1999


                                       41
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: June 14, 2011
By:
/s/Liu ChuanjieName:
Liu ChuanjieTitle:
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

June 3, 1964

No. 68598.

protest 62/19807 (Los Angeles).

#### California Radio & Electricity Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel’ that the merchandise consists of meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. G. *L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, J. Brett Harvey, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of CNX Gas Corporation (the Registrant), certify that to my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, of the Registrant (the Report):

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

Date: February 17, 2009



/s/ J. BRETT HARVEYJ. Brett HarveyChief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 99.2







Independent Accountant’s Report








Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)
 One Wells Fargo Center
 301 South College Street
 Charlotte, NC 28288
 
 U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)
 Corporate Trust Department
 100 Wall Street
 New York, NY 10005
 
 
 Re:
STRATSTrust For JPMorgan Chase Capital XVII Securities, Series 2005-2 (the “Trust”)
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
 We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, (the “Trustee” and together with the Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of August 22, 2005 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), in respect of the STRATS Trust ForJPMorgan Chase Capital XVII Securities, Series 2005-2(the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based on our examination.
 
 Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2011.
 /s/ Aston Bell, CPA
 
 New York, New York
 March 16, 2012