alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00338-CR

Joseph Weber, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-13-904090, HONORABLE DAVID CRAIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

It has come to the Court’s attention that the transcript from the suppression hearing

in this case was not made a part of the reporter’s record filed in this Court and sent to appellant

Joseph Weber. It appears that there are several trial court cause numbers assigned to Weber, that in

some of those cause numbers the cases were dismissed, that Weber was reindicted on the same

charge in at least one instance, and that the transcription of the suppression hearing pertinent

tothis appeal was actually recorded in cause numbers D-1-DC-11-300825 and D-1-DC-11-300826

on July 10, 2013. Accordingly, we order court reporter Raquel Kocher to file a supplemental

reporter’s record from that suppression hearing with the district clerk and with the Clerk of this

Court no later than May 26, 2017. We further order the district clerk to provide a copy of the

supplemental reporter’s record to Weber and to provide written verification to this Court of the date
and manner in which the supplemental reporter’s record was provided no later than May 31, 2017.

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

It is ordered April 26, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin

Do Not Publish

2
<PAGE>   1
 
                       CONSENT OF CIBC OPPENHEIMER CORP.
 
     We hereby consent to the inclusion of our opinion letter dated August 8,
1998 to the Board of Directors of American Disposal Services, Inc. ("American")
as Appendix D to American's proxy statement for its special meeting of
stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") being called to vote upon the proposed
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among American, Allied Waste Industries,
Inc. and AWIN II Acquisition Corporation and the transactions contemplated
thereby. We also consent to the references to our firm and such opinion in such
Proxy Statement. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we come within the
category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), or the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder (the "Regulations"), nor do we
admit that we are experts with respect to any part of such Proxy Statement
within the meaning of the term "experts" as used in the Act or the Regulations.
 
                                          CIBC OPPENHEIMER CORP.
 
                                          By:
 
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Marshall Heinberg
                                            Title: Managing Director
 
August 28, 1998
### Page 1 of 3 Disposition Comments

Docket No: 

### FAA

- 20 1 5

- 1 130 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 

### 20 1 5

- CE

- 0 08

- AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.:

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM



### N o C omments/Only Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are

required.

No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

lis t latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues

from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA

- IR

- M

- 8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one o

f the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO

, we don’t agree because

ISSUE 2 : Select one of the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree w ith because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If NO

, we don’t agree because

For additional issues, do uble

- click here

### Page 3 of 3 S ignature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.:

ASE Printed Name : Date

Branch M anager Date
Daniel Ruthenberg-Marshall 

druthmar@gmail.com 

My name is Daniel Marshall, and I'm a freelance videographer based in the DC area. 

A cousin of mine recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy also named Daniel. He's not named 

after me, but he's still a bundle of joy and the best behaved baby you'II ever meet. 

While my cousin was pregnant, I remember her talking about some of the things she wasn't 

supposed to be doing. Among them was eating seafood, and I thought about our coal-fired power 

plants emitting tens of thousands of pounds of inercury into the atmosphere each year, and how 

that mercury rains down and contaminates our waterways and poisons our fish. Not enough that 

the average person would notice, but definitely enough for baby Daniel to notice. 

We welcomed Daniel into this world in June, and I'm happy to say that my cousin is fortunate 

enough to live in a neighborhood far away from any coal-fired power plant, and Daniel's risk of 

getting Asthma isn't significanby increased. But what about all the children who are being bom 

every day and growing up in neighborhoods where asthma and cancer rates are going through 

the roof? Those children aren't afForded the same opportunities as Daniel, because we as a 

society can't get our act together. 

I sometimes wonder what would happen to Daniel if he had been bom in Beijing, where some 

days the air quality is so poor you can't see across the street. Hundreds of babies are being 

bom every day in that city and breathing that toxic air as their first breath on this beautiful planet 

we call earth, breathing deep and taking in some of the worst air on the planet. Those babies got 

truly unlucky being bom into that situation, into a country that isn't free and to a people who 

cannot advocate for themselves without fear of persecution. 

Here, we have that unalienable right to speak up and be heard, but what good is it if you, our 

government, does not listen? What happens if you ignore the will of the people, if you ignore 

common sense, if you ignore the in-efutable science that illustrates the necessity of these 

regulations? Will our air continue to worsen? Will it eventually sink to such levels that everyone 

can physically SEE the danger they face with every breath? 

Sometimes I like to believe that we live in a functional Republic, where the govemment answers 

to the people, instead of this quagmire we currenby find ourselves surrounded by in this great 

city. Thankfully, in this case, it's a small, easy step to take. You have the power to finalize this 

rule, and you have the moral obligation to do so. 

For my sake. For baby Daniel's sake. For the sake of every single person in this beautiful 

country, I hope you finalize this rule and help us guarantee a clean and safe atmosphere for 

generations to come. Thank you.
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00048-CV

In the Matter of R.A.J., a Child

(No. 10,253-J#1 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 1 OF POTTER COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Motion fee

Reporter's record

Motion fee

Statewide efiling fee

Filing

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee $15.00

$10.00

$1,050.00

$10.00

$20.00

$100.00

$25.00

$50.00 INDIGENT

INDIGENT

UNKNOWN

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT John C Bennett

John C Bennett

Potter County

John C Bennett

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on March 24, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101930 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account Ten on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of
our report dated February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account Ten relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1077 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1077

 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to allow consumers 
 greater access to information regarding the health benefits of foods 
                        and dietary supplements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

  Mr. Paul (for himself, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
  Hostettler, and Mr. Stump) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to allow consumers 
 greater access to information regarding the health benefits of foods 
                        and dietary supplements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Health Free Speech Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    Section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 321(g)(1)) is amended in clause (B) by inserting ``(other than 
food, including dietary supplements)'' after ``articles''.

SEC. 3. ADULTERATED FOOD.

    Section 402(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 342(f)(1)) is amended in subparagraphs (A) and (B) by striking 
``significant or unreasonable'' and inserting ``significant and 
unreasonable''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard M. Shea, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986]; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2003

                                             /s/ Richard M. Shea
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Richard M. Shea
                                             Title: Chief Operating Officer
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer
### NUMBER 13

- 1 1

- 00074

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS,

EX REL. ARMANDO R. VILLALOBOS,

COUNTY (DISTRICT) ATTORNEY,

CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 1

Relator, the State of Texas, ex rel. Armando R. Villalobos, County (District)

Attorney, Cameron County, Texas

, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above

cause on February 14 , 2011, seeking to compel the trial court to vacate its January 19,

2011 order rescinding its previously entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and

granting a de novo hearing on a motion to suppress. On February 16, 2011, the State

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is

not required to do so.”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. The Court, having

examined and fully considered the motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that th e motion

should be granted. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 17th

day of February , 201 1

.
**Certification**

I, Yan Liu, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board of Toro Ventures Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB/A of the Company.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and have:

    a.    designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byother within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

    b.    (paragraph omitted pursuantto SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;)

    c.    evaluated the effectivenessof the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

    d.    disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the Company's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting ; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of theCompany's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a.    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

    b.    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/ "Yan Liu"

Yan Liu

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial OFfficer andChairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer)

June 18, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  224,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                    69,552
<INVENTORY>                                     13,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,644
<PP&E>                                         152,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 535,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,406
<BONDS>                                        252,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           144
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   535,452
<SALES>                                        475,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               475,558
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  367,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                81,178
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,977
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,505
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 4.19.01

                                 SUPPLEMENT TO
                SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY


          SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY AND SECURITY
AGREEMENT, dated as of August 24, 2000, by and among the Guarantors party
thereto, Salem Communications Holding Corporation and The Bank of New York, as
Administrative Agent (as the same may be amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the "Agreement").

                                                      November 7, 2000

          Capitalized terms used herein which are not otherwise defined herein
shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement. Pursuant
to Section 15 of the Agreement, by execution and delivery of this Supplement
and, upon acceptance hereof by the Administrative Agent, the undersigned (i)
shall be, and shall be deemed to be, a "Guarantor" under, and as such term is
defined in, the Agreement, (ii) shall have made, and shall be deemed to have
made, the representations and warranties contained in Section 5 of the Agreement
on and as of the date hereof, (iii) as security for the payment and performance
in full of its Guarantor Obligations, does hereby create and grant to the
Administrative Agent, its successors and permitted assigns, for its benefit and
the ratable benefit of the Secured Parties, their respective successors and
permitted assigns, a security interest in the Collateral (as defined in the
Agreement) of the Additional Guarantor and (iv) shall have made, and shall be
deemed to have made, all of the covenants and agreements of a Guarantor set
forth in the Agreement.

                           SALEM COMMUNICATIONS ACQUISITION
                           CORPORATION

                           By: /s/ Jonathan L. Block
                               -------------------------------

                           Name: Jonathan L. Block
                                 -----------------------------

                           Title: Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
                                  ---------------------------------------------


                           Address for Notices:
                           --------------------

                           Attention: Jonathan L. Block
                                      ------------------------

                                      ------------------------

                           Telephone: (805) 987-0400
                                      ------------------------

                           Telecopy: (805) 384-4505
                                     -------------------------


<PAGE>   2
Ex 4.19.01 cont'd

Accepted and agreed to as
of the date first above written:

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Administrative Agent


By: /s/ Stephen M. Nettler
    ----------------------
Name:   Stephen M. Nettler
      --------------------
Title:  Vice President
       -------------------

                   [SCHEDULES CORRESPONDING TO THE SCHEDULES
                      IN THE AGREEMENT ARE TO BE ATTACHED]