alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2023039EN.01006601.xml

| 9.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/66

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1193 of 11 July 2022 establishing measures to eradicate and prevent the spread of Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) Yabuuchi et al. 1996 emend. Safni et al. 2014

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 185 of 12 July 2022
  )

On page 37, Annex II is replaced as follows:

‘ANNEX II

Survey template referred to in Article 3(3)

Template for presenting brown rot survey results for the potato and tomato harvests of the preceding calendar year.

This table shall only be used for the survey results for the potatoes and tomatoes harvested in your country.

| MS | Category | Cropping area (ha) | Laboratory testing | Visual inspection of tubers
   (1) | Visual inspections of the growing crop
   (1) | Other information |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Number of samples | Number of lots | Size of the lots (in t or ha) | Sampling period | No of positive | Number of samples inspected | Size of sample | No of posi-tive samples
   (2) | Number of visual inspections | No of ha (potatoes) or plants (tomatoes) | No of posi-tive results
   (2) |
| Samples | Lots |
| | Certified tubers for planting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other tubers for planting (specify) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ware and processing potatoes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other tubers (specify) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tomatoes intended for replanting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other hosts (specify species, river/area) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Water (specify river/area/location of premises) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

MS

Category

Cropping area (ha)

Laboratory testing

Visual inspection of tubers
   (1)

Visual inspections of the growing crop
   (1)

Other information

Number of samples

Number of lots

Size of the lots (in t or ha)

Sampling period

No of positive

Number of samples inspected

Size of sample

No of posi-tive samples
   (2)

Number of visual inspections

No of ha (potatoes) or plants (tomatoes)

No of posi-tive results
   (2)

Samples

Lots

Certified tubers for planting

Other tubers for planting (specify)

Ware and processing potatoes

Other tubers (specify)

Tomatoes intended for replanting

Other hosts (specify species, river/area)

Water (specify river/area/location of premises)

---

(1)  Shall be understood as macroscopic examination of tubers or crops.

1

(2)  Symptoms were found, a sample was taken and the laboratory testing confirmed the presence of the specified pest.’

2

---
Before the Second Division,

October 26, 1967

No. P67/361.

#### C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 63/22501, etc. (New York).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of waterproof cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Amity*Fabrics, *Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2416), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1047

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel NORFOLK.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1999

Mr. PICKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

NORFOLK.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and section 12106 of title

5 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation

6 may issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate

7 endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the
2

•HR 1047 IH

1 vessel NORFOLK (United States official number

2 1077852).

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

WILLIAM HENRY COSBY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 63 MM 2016 

 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Review is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2056

BRIAN CHARLES VAETH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, FIRE & POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 

SYSTEMS OF BALTIMORE CITY; WILLIAM J. GOODWIN, JR., Chief of 

Baltimore City Fire Department; MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF 

BALTIMORE CITY; FREDERICK MCGRATH, Hearing Examiner, Panel 

of Hearing Examiners for the Fire & Police Employees 

Retirement Systems of Baltimore City,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:08-cv-00708-RDB)

Submitted: November 9, 2010 Decided: November 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Charles Vaeth, Appellant Pro Se. William Rowe Phelan, 

Jr., Sabrina Willis, BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF LAW, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brian Charles Vaeth appeals the district court’s order 

granting judgment to Defendants in this action raising various 

federal and state claims in connection with his termination from 

employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Vaeth v. Bd. of Trustees, Fire & Police 

Employees Retirement Sys., No. 1:08-cv-00708-RDB (D. Md. 

Aug. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
Wu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Dragon
International Group Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Dragon
International Group Corp.





February
19, 2008




By:
 /s/ David Wu


David Wu,
CEO





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Dragon International Group Corp.;. and will be retained by Dragon International
Group Corp. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]









25
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 429 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 429

 Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the electricity crisis in 
              San Diego and Orange Counties in California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 2000

 Mr. Bilbray submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the electricity crisis in 
              San Diego and Orange Counties in California.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that (1) the President should 
declare an economic emergency for San Diego and Orange Counties because 
of the electricity crisis in those counties which began in the summer 
of 2000 and (2) to help alleviate that crisis, the President should 
authorize that, until December 31, 2002, Federal electric energy shall 
be available for purchase by investor owned electric utilities for 
resale to consumers in the State of California and that such energy be 
available to such utilities at the same wholesale rates as are 
applicable to wholesale Federal power sales to public power agencies.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Annette Eggert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|   |                    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | /s/ Annette Eggert      |
|   |                         |
|   | Annette Eggert          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date: December 1, 2010  |
|   |                    |

----
No. 58819.

protest 209408-K (New York).

#### National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the facts are similar to those involved in Abstracts 57104 and 47521, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66193.

#### Enlite Products Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/34561 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of noneellulosic plastic streamers used on the ends of handlebars of bicycles or velocipedes similar in use to streamers in chief value of steel, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00414-CR

Style: Stevie Wyre

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: September 4, 2013

Type of motion: Extension of time to file reporter’s record

Party filing motion: Court reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 9, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: July 9, 2013

Date Requested: October 4, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: October 4, 2013

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 12, 2013
Exhibit 31.1**Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Kenneth C. Budde, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f))and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 13, 2006/s/ KENNETH C. BUDDE
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 1257 Directorate Identifier: 2011
- NM - 124
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA**  **, etc)?** (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE ATA Jo e White 5/112011 No response Boeing B. Linder et al 4/29/2010 Ac knowledged

Other/Additional Information:
A90A0135.

#### McSMITH v. MARSHALL.

(390 SE2d 126)

Decided January 25, 1990.

Derek McSmith, *pro se.*

Carolyn Marshall, *pro se.*

Deen, Presiding Judge.

This case involves an appeal from the decision of the State Court of Fulton County reviewing the decision of that county’s magistrate court concerning an altercation between appellant and appellee.

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11) requires that such decisions of the State Court be brought to this court by application for a discretionary appeal rather than by direct appeal. Appellant has failed to follow these mandatory procedures. Therefore, this appeal must be dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*
##### 



Exhibit
10.1.2
 POLYMEDICA CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN
 
 THE POLYMEDICA CORPORATION EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN
 RECITALS :
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 ARTICLE I
 DEFINITIONS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



specified employees
 4




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
 ELIGIBILITY
 Determining Eligibility
       5




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 CONTRIBUTIONS
 General
 Tax-Deferred Contributions
 Tax-Deferred Contribution Elections
 Timing of Tax-Deferred Contribution Elections
 Special Rule for First Year of Participation
 Allocation to Retirement or In-Service Accounts
 6




---



##### 



Timing of Tax Deferred Contributions
  Amount of Matching Contributions
 Timing of Matching Contributions
  Amount of Employer Contributions
 Timing of Discretionary Employer Contributions
  Deferral Contribution Elections
 Deferral Contribution Agreement
 7




---



##### 



Special Rule for Directors First Year of Participation
 Timing of Deferral Contributions.
 ARTICLE IV
 VESTING
 All Accounts.
 ARTICLE V
 VALUATION OF PARTICIPANTS ACCOUNTS
 Account Value
 Contribution to Trust
 ARTICLE VI
 DISTRIBUTIONS
 Timing of Distributions
  8




---



##### 



Timing of Retirement Account Distribution
 Distributions to Specified Employees.
 Timing of Deferral Accounts Distribution
  Form of In-Service Account Distributions
 9




---



##### 



Form of Retirement Account Distributions
 Form of Deferral Account Distributions
 Changes to Forms of Distributions; Failure to Elect Form
 Payments to Beneficiaries
 Change in Control
 Method of Distribution
 10




---



##### 



Hardship Distributions
 No Acceleration of Benefits
 ARTICLE VII
 ADMINISTRATION
 Powers and Duties
        11




---



##### 



Agents
 Procedures
 Claims Procedure
      12




---



##### 



Indemnification
 Participants Bound
 Receipts and Release
 13




---



##### 



Withholding or Deduction for Taxes
 ARTICLE VIII
 MISCELLANEOUS
 Unfunded Plan
 Impact on Other Executive Benefits
 Governing Law
 No Assignment
 Severability
 14




---



##### 



Headings and Subheadings
 Gender
 Amendment and Termination
 No Employment Contract or Retention Right
 15




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF st
 PolyMedica CorporationBy:

/s/
Patrick T. RyanName:
    Patrick T. RyanTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 16
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20032 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARNOLD WAYNE ROLLINGS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-252-ALL Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arnold Wayne Rollings presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by U nited States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D July 9, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Order entered February 22, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00217-CV

IN RE: LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Relator

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-7655-S

ORDER

The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. On the Court’s own 

motion, we CONSOLIDATE this original proceeding, cause no. 05-13-00217-CV, with and 

under the original proceeding bearing cause no. 05-13-00123-CV, styled In re LaKeith AmirSharif. The Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to remove all documents from file number 

05-13-00217-CV and to refile them in cause no. 05-13-00123-CV and to treat 05-13-00217-CV 

as a closed case.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                             188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,151)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,911
<PP&E>                                          48,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,464)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,348
<BONDS>                                          1,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              296
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,414
<SALES>                                         18,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,228
<CGS>                                           14,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,096)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>