alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 4.3

DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES 
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 


As of February 24, 2021, Zovio Inc has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our Common Stock.
Description of Common Stock
The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) and our Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each of which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.3 is a part. We encourage you to read our Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, for additional information.
Authorized Capital Shares
Our authorized capital stock will consist of 300,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), and 20,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. The outstanding shares of our Common Stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
Voting Rights
The holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by stockholders. All shares of Common Stock rank equally as to voting and all other matters. The shares of Common Stock have no preemptive or conversion rights, no redemption or sinking fund provisions, are not liable for further call or assessment and are not entitled to cumulative voting rights.
Dividend Rights
The holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably any dividends when and as declared from time to time by the board of directors out of funds legally available for dividends. We have never declared or paid cash dividends. We currently intend to retain all future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future.
Liquidation Rights
Upon a liquidation or dissolution of our company, whether voluntary or involuntary, creditors with preferential liquidation rights will be paid before any distribution to holders of our Common Stock. After such distribution, holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive a pro rata distribution per share of any excess amount.
Undesignated Preferred Stock
The board of directors has the authority to issue undesignated preferred stock without stockholder approval, subject to applicable law and listing exchange standards. The board of directors may also determine or alter for each class of preferred stock the voting powers, designations, preferences and special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions as permitted by law. The board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of the Common Stock.
Listing
Our Common Stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the trading symbol “ZVO.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
September 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 38,603
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           8,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                242,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                         30,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        270,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   4,469
<BONDS>                                               147,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   73
<OTHER-SE>                                             87,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          270,316
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       10,304
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        5,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      2,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         2,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     2,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            2,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.37


</TABLE>
# Julia Moline

**Office of Response and Recovery**
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Logistics

Julia Moline is the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Logistics Operations, for FEMA’s Logistics Management Directorate, Office of Response and Recovery. The Logistics Management Directorate provides a comprehensive, coordinated logistics capability to respond to the needs of state governments and citizens during major disasters and emergencies. Her office oversees the execution and management of FEMA’s comprehensive supply chain operations including FEMA’s distribution centers and transportation functions. Additionally, Julia’s office is the primary lead for the acquisition and deployment of FEMA’s temporary housing mission.

Previously, Julia served with FEMA’s Public Assistance (PA) Division, most recently as Program Design Branch Chief and Program Delivery Branch Chief. In that capacity, she was instrumental in implementing the national PA Delivery Model, including establishing the four Consolidated Resource Centers, designing innovative processes and technology solutions, and establishing a mentorship function for field PA leadership. Those capabilities enabled FEMA to deliver record levels of financial assistance to communities in need, including $46B for COVID-19 and $30B for Puerto Rico’s recovery. Moline has also served as the Analytics Lead in the Field Operations Directorate and in Recovery Analytics, where she designed and developed workforce planning models to support field operations.

Prior to joining FEMA, Moline was a civil engineer with Dewberry, focused on hazard mitigation grants and guidance. Moline holds a Master’s in Technology and Policy from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from Columbia University, and a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Columbia University.

Last updated April 11, 2023

Return to top
# PLRE_4.9.2024

https://elibrary.ferc.gov/http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary/quick-tip.pdf
No. 58852.

protest 240226-K (New York).

#### Roberts, Reilly & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose proof sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s assessment, the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belair Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report  of the  Fund on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended
     September 30, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Date:  November 10, 2003


                                /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                -------------------------
                                Michelle A. Alexander
                                Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,822
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,824
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,846
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,832
<LOANS>                                        233,721
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,437
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,075
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 286,437
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,822
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,073
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,970
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,187
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,187
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,783
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (20)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,657
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,657
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.52
<LOANS-NON>                                        925
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   390
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,134
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   760
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,218
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,218
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 49897.

#### Protests 650662-G, etc., of & Co.York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cotton rags the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Schapiro*(24 C. C. P. A. 343, T. D. 48771) and that the percentages of rags in the shipment used chiefly for paper making were the same as those involved in the cited case. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1750 was sustained to that extent.
No. 60662.

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. *v.*United States,

protests 240410-K, 241081-K, and 242324-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
No. 62411.

#### Lionel B. Alberto et al. *v.*United States,

protests 159248-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 9,649.

#### The MISSISQUOI.

[8 Ben. 6.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

Jan., 1875.

Collision — Steamboat and Small Boat — Right of Wat — Pleading.

1. A man in a small boat saw a steamboat approaching him, two or three hundred feet away. He alleged that the steamboat came on without slacking speed and struck his boat before he had time to get out of the «way; and he filed a libel to recover for the damage to the boat. *Held,*that, on this libel, which conceded the obligation of the small boat to get out of the way of the steamboat, if she had time, the question was whether she did have time.

2. As the libel stated that the steamboat'was two or three hundred feet away when she was seen, the small boat did have time to get out of the way, and the libel must be dismissed.

[Cited in The Bay Queen, 42 Fed. 272.]

In admiralty;

Beebe, Wilcox & Hobbs, for libellant.

Charles E. Crowell, for claimant

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict, Esq., and Benj. Lincoln Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover for the destruction of a small boat which was crushed between a canal-boat, lying alongside the Columbia dock, and the propeller Missisquoi. The statement of the libel is, that the propeller was seen approaching when 200 or 300 feet distant, and then was hailed, but that she came on without slacking her speed and struck the small boat before the man in the boat had time to get the boat out of thj way.

Upon this libel, which concedes the obligation of the small boat to get out of the way of the approaching tug, if given time to do so, the question is whether the libellant did have time to pull his boat out of the way of the propeller, after the propeller was seen by him to be approaching. The weight of the evidence is that ho had such time. Indeed, this may be said to appear on the face of the libel, as it is quite manifest that a small boat with a man in it could be pulled the few feet necessary to take her out of the danger of being crushed between the boats, sooner than the propeller would move the 200 or 800 feet she is stated in the libel to have been distant, when seen and hailed by the libellant. The libel' is dismissed with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 126 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H.J. RES. 126

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                           for other purposes

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 4, 2000

Mr. Young  of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                           for other purposes

    Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the dated specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``December 7, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

June 27, 1945

No. 50306.

#### Protest 104728-K/12594 of Balsa Ecuador Lumber Corp. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the case was submitted upon the record *219without the introduction of any evidence. From an examination of the entry papers it was found that the shortage reported in the affidavit was disallowed because it had not been verified by the inspector or measurer. Upon the filing of protest, a report was requested from the discharging inspector as to the correctness of the importer’s claim of shortage. This report established there was no shortage and since there was no evidence to support the importer’s claim, the protest was overruled. ‘ •
AMERICAN AIRLINES 

April 9, 2010 

Dorothy Beard 

Docket Branch 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: 	 oneworld Application for Antitrust Immunity, 

DOT-OST-2008-0252 

Dear 	Ms. Beard: 

In their comments on show-cause Order 2010-2-8 on March 30, 

2010, the joint applicants stated that the European Commission 

is in the process of formally market testing a set of commitments for the JBA. The Commission's document is available at 

itrust isions 39596 

con:unitments.pdf 

On behalf of the Joint Applicants, 

jtf:<:7o~; 0p--CbN 


Senior Attorney 

American Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5675 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

(817) 967 3478 

jeff.ogar@aa.com 

cc: 	 Service list 
------------

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing 

document by email on the following persons: 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com 

scott.mcclain@delta.com bill@mietuslaw.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com 

kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

mrosia@crowell.com mcmillin@woa.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com eskraft@jamhoff.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com 

robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com 

msinick@ssd.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

gbleopard@fedex.com jim.ballough@faa.gov 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com byerlyjr@state.gov 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hhlaw.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net 

mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com rpommer@atlasair.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com 

sophy.chen@hklaw.com russell.bailey@alpa.org 

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com 

CA<d.'1~--- April 9, 2010 

--.-­
No. 57555.

#### Baylor Watch Co. and S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 193125-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the watch movements in question measure more than 1 inch but not less than 1.77 inches wide. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40193 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. HEON JONG YOO, also known as Hank Yoo , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:18

- CR

- 16

- 1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Heon Jong “Hank” Yoo appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for release on bail pending his sentencing for making false statements to federal firearms dealers and being a prohibited person in possession of several firearms . The district court deemed Yoo a flight risk and a potential danger to others. Unless there is clear and convincing evidence that Yoo present s no risk of danger or flight, presentence detention i s mandated

. See 18 U.S.C.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 25, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40193 Document: 00514931062 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2019No. 19

- 40193

2 § 3143(a). We review the district court’s ruling for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Olis , 450 F.3d 583, 585 (5th Cir. 2006)

. Yoo fails to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk. Moreover, the evidence strongly supports the finding that he presents a risk of danger. Trial evidence established that Yoo was twice involuntarily committed to mental hospitals because he presented a risk of danger to others. In addition, the presentence report noted that Yoo was involuntarily admitted to a mental institution after a Texas Ranger expressed concerns that Yoo intended to act violently. Further, Yoo was arrested, though not prosecuted, after police responded to reports of an aggravated assault and found that Yoo and three others men had “traveled to a residence while ‘armed to the teeth’ seeking a confrontation” with someone who had allegedly assaulted two of the other men. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying release on bail pending sentencing. That ruling is AFFIRMED. To the extent Yoo moves this court to grant bail under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 9(b), the motion
is DENIED. Case: 19-40193 Document: 00514931062 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2019
Before the Second Division,

October 29, 1953

No. 57575.

#### The Danwill Company *v.*United States,

protest 174057-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of lead scrap of which metal is the component material of chief value and that it is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
No. 57876.

protests 196390-K, etc. (New York).

#### Barth Feinburg, Inc., and Lansen-Naeve Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, G. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pieces of vellum the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57385, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1736 was sustained.
No. 61204.

protests 226869-K and 231683-K (Baltimore).

#### William H. Masson *v.*United States,

*433Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Sehippach Pencil Olay,” not a ball clay, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Joseph Dixon Crucible Company*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 157, C. D. 1816), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.