alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 49 Agreed to April 30, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF BIKE RODEO ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

The Earth Force Youth Bike Summit (in this resolution referred

to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a bike rodeo

(in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) on the Capitol Grounds

on May 5, 1999, or on such other date as the Speaker of the

House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized by section 1 shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall assume full

responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities

associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

(a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the approval of

the Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor may erect upon the Capitol

Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related

structures and equipment as may be required for the event authorized by section 1.

(b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of the Capitol

and the Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such

additional arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, and

solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions

applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event authorized by section 1.

SEC. 5. LIMITATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—No person may represent, either directly

or indirectly, that this resolution or any activity carried out under

this resolution in any way constitutes approval or endorsement

by the Federal Government of any person or any product or service.
H. Con. Res. 49—2

(b) ENFORCEMENT.—The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board shall enter into an agreement with the sponsor,

and such other persons participating in the event authorized by

section 1 as the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

Board considers appropriate, under which such persons shall agree

to comply with the requirements of subsection (a). The agreement

shall specifically prohibit the use of any photograph taken at the

event for a commercial purpose and shall provide for the imposition

of financial penalties if any violations of the agreement occur.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1125

To amend the Trademark Act of 1946 to increase the penalties for infringing

the rights pertaining to famous performing groups and to clarify the

law pertaining to the rights of individuals who perform services as a

group.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1999

Mr. KUCINICH (for himself and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Trademark Act of 1946 to increase the penalties for infringing the rights pertaining to famous performing groups and to clarify the law pertaining to the

rights of individuals who perform services as a group.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FALSE DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN, FALSE DE4 SCRIPTIONS, AND DILUTION.

5 Section 43(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide

6 for the registration and protection of trade-marks used in

7 commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain inter8 national conventions, and for other purposes.’’, approved
2

•HR 1125 IH

1 July 5, 1946 (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Trademark

2 Act of 1946) (15 U.S.C. 1125(a)), is amended by adding

3 at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(3) It shall not be a violation of this Act or the stat5 utes or common law of any State for an individual who

6 had been a member of a group under a common famous

7 name in commerce and subsequently terminated any rela8 tionship with such group to be able to represent, in any

9 promotions, advertisements, or performing of the same

10 services as those performed by such group during the time

11 such individual was a member of such group, or other

12 services, that such individual had formerly been a member

13 of such group performing under such famous name, if

14 such representations do not tend to deceive or confuse as

15 to the nature, characteristics, qualities, geographic origin,

16 sponsorship, or approval of his or her services with such

17 group.’’.

18 SEC. 2. TREBLE DAMAGES.

19 Section 35(b) of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15

20 U.S.C. 1117(b)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘(15

21 U.S.C. 1116(d)),’’ the following: ‘‘or that consists of the

22 use of a famous name designating a performing group or

23 individual well known to the public of the United States,

24 whether or not such name is registered under this Act,’’.

Æ
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 118

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking
2

•HJ 118 EH

1 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘October

2 29, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 28,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 118

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.
No. 52849.

#### Charles W. Baum Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 132682-K, etc. (New York),

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
S02A1020.

#### ARNOLD v. ARNOLD.

(566 SE2d 679)

Decided July 15, 2002.

*Smith, White, Sharma & Halpern, Tina G. Stanford, David A. Webster,*for appellant.

Julian T. Arnold, *pro se.*

*Stephen R. Scarborough,*amicus curiae.

Carley, Justice.

Julian Arnold (Husband) filed for divorce from Kimberly Arnold (Wife) and sought custody of their minor children. A bench trial was held. In the final decree, the trial court awarded primary physical custody to Wife, but also prohibited the children from any contact with a certain named friend of Wife and imposed on her the responsibility of being sure that there was no such exposure. In the motion for new trial, Wife urged the trial court to delete this provision from the decree. The trial court denied the motion, and Wife applied for a discretionary appeal. We granted the application to determine whether imposition of the restriction complies with the standard established by *Brandenburg v. Brandenburg,*274 Ga. 183, 184 (1) (551 SE2d 721) (2001).

In the absence of any evidence that exposure to a third party will have an adverse effect on the best interests of the children, a trial court abuses its discretion by prohibiting a parent from exercising his or her custodial rights in that person’s presence. *Brandenburg v. Brandenburg,*supra at 184 (1). Here, there is no evidence that the relationship between Wife and her friend was or will be harmful to the children, or that they ever engaged in any inappropriate conduct in the presence of the children. Thus, the trial court abused its discretion by placing an unauthorized restriction on Wife’s exercise of her rights as a custodial parent. *Brandenburg v. Brandenburg,*supra at 184 (1).

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Nicholas J. DeIuliis, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of CNX Gas Corporation (the Registrant), certify
that to my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, of the Registrant (the Report):



(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: February 21, 2006



/s/    NICHOLAS J.
DEIULIISNicholas J. DeIuliis President and Chief Executive Officer
February 15, 1965

Reap. Dec. 10907.

#### Tiya Caviar Co. *v.*United States,

Reappraisements dismissed December 1, 1964.

REHEARING MOTION DENIED

Motion by plaintiff.
# L_2023084EN.01002601.xml

| 23.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/26

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2022/2434 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 319 of 13 December 2022
  )

On page 3, recital 12:

for:

| ‘(12) | In the interest of legal certainty and clarity in respect of already granted financial assistance and in respect of financial assistance under Regulation (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (macro-financial assistance +) (7), this Regulation should only apply to programmes of financial assistance the basic acts of which enter into force on or after 9 November 2022. |
| --- | --- |

‘(12)

read:

| ‘(12) | In the interest of legal certainty and clarity in respect of already granted financial assistance and in respect of financial assistance under Regulation (EU) 2022/2463 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7), this Regulation should only apply to programmes of financial assistance the basic acts of which enter into force on or after 9 November 2022. |
| --- | --- |

‘(12)

---

(7)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.’,

7

(7)  Regulation (EU) 2022/2463 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing an instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (macro-financial assistance +) (OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 1).’.

7

---
Before Judge Richardson,

December 12, 1967

No. R67/127.

#### Karl Schroff & Assocs., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisement R61/20496 (Chicago).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and facts are the same in all material respects as those in *Kay Pee Import Export Co.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 696, R.D. 11164), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402a (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for determination of the value of the candy in plastic containers and that such export value is 39 cents per box of 60 pieces, net packed.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 28

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Wilgents of the Smithsonian Institution. liams, Jr. as a citizen regent of the Board of Re-
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 28

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr.

as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat-
2

•HJ 28 EH

1 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

2 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

3 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

4 reason of the expiration of the term of Wesley S. Williams,

5 Jr. of the District of Columbia on April 11, 1999, is filled

6 by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term of six

7 years, effective April 12, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Case No. 6,611.

#### HOLLINGSWORTH v. ADAMS.

[2 Dall. 396.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

1798.

Jurisdiction or Federal Courts — Foreign' Attachments.

No civil suit can be brought before a United States circuit or district court in any other district than that whereof defendant is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found.

[Cited in Picquet v. Swan, Case No. 11.134; Atkins v. Fibre Disintegrating Co., Id. 602.]

Foreign attachment returnable to the present term. The defendant was stated to be a citizen of Delaware, in the process which had issued; and M. Levy, having produced an affidavit in proof of that fact, moved to quash the writ, on the ground, that the federal courts had no jurisdiction, in cases of foreign attachment. By the 11th section of the judicial act, — 1 Swift, Laws, 55 [1 Stat. 78], — it is expressly provided, that “no person shall be arrested in one district for trial in another, in any civil action before a circuit, or district, court: And no civil suit shall be brought before eitHer of the said courts against an inhabitant of the United States, by any original process, in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found at the time of serving the writ.” Now, this is a civil suit, brought here by original process against the defendant, who is an inhabitant of another district, and was not found in Pennsylvania at the time of serving the writ.

Thomas & Hallowell, on behalf of plaintiff,

wished for time to enquire into the practice; but not being able on the next day to assign any satisfactory reason in maintenance of the action,

THE COURT

directed the writ to be quashed with costs.
Before the First Division,

December 23, 1944

No. 49903.

#### Protests 55166-K, etc., of Du Barry Novelty Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the beads in question composed wholly or in chief value of glass are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867). In accordance therewith this claim was sustained.
March 4, 1953

No. 57132.

Suit 4710.

#### Robinson-Wagner Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1363 affirmed November 4, 1952. C. A. D. 501.
WMD-HW-11 2014

Identification of Hazardous Waste

As provided in the New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules, Env-Hw 100-1100

The New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules, Env-Hw 103.62, define hazardous waste as any solid, semisolid, liquid or contained gaseous waste, or any combination of these wastes, which:

a. May cause or contribute to an increase in irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness.

b. Poses a present or potential threat to human health or the environment if improperly

managed.

c. Has been identified as a hazardous waste by the Waste Management Division.

Characteristics of a Hazardous Waste

1. Is it ignitable? (flash point <60° Celsius or <140° F as per Env-Hw 403.03)

2. Is it corrosive? (pH < 2.0 or > 12.5 as per Env-Hw 403.04)

3. Is it reactive? (reacts violently with water or air; is explosive, or cyanide or sulfide-bearing – see 

Env-Hw 403.05)

4. Does it fail the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)? (contains heavy metals,

pesticides, herbicides or organics listed in Env-Hw 403.06)

(If you answered “yes” to any of the above, the waste is considered hazardous.)

Lists of Hazardous Wastes

1. Is it listed in Env-Hw 402.04? (acutely hazardous wastes, P-listed)

2. Is it listed in Env-Hw 402.05? (toxic hazardous wastes, U-listed)

3. Is it listed in Env-Hw 402.06? (generic industrial process wastes, F-listed)

4. Is it listed in Env-Hw 402.07? (specific industrial process wastes, K-listed)

5. Is it a hazardous waste mixture pursuant to Env- Hw 404.01?

6. See Chapter Env-Hw 400 of the Hazardous Waste Rules for additional information.

(If you answered “yes” to any of the above, the waste is considered hazardous.)

For more information:

Questions regarding this fact sheet should be directed to the NHDES, Waste Management 

Division at (603) 271-2942 or toll free within New Hampshire at 866-HAZWAST. For a 

complete description of the requirements, refer to the New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules, 

Env-Hw 100-1100, available from NHDES’ website at www.des.nh.gov.
 HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION

 Is it a waste? Yes

* New Hampshire’s mixture rule remains slightly more stringent than EPA’s since New Hampshire regulates the mixture of any 

listed hazardous waste with any waste or material. Revised 7/2014

START

Is the waste exempt from NH 

Hazardous Waste Rules?

(Env-Hw 401.03)

Is the waste a listed hazardous 

waste?

(Env-Hw 402)

Does the waste exhibit a 

hazardous characteristic?

(Env-Hw 403)

Is the waste a regulated 

hazardous waste mixture?

(Env-Hw 404.01 is NH’s 

equivalent to 40 CFR 261.3*)

Is the source of the 

contamination known to 

contain or be derived from a 

listed hazardous waste?

(Env-Hw 404.02, Env-Hw 

404.03, Type P, U, F, or K)

MANAGE AS

HAZARDOUS

WASTE

MANAGE AS

SOLID

WASTE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-78;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006By:      /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-05679 of Outdoor Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 21,
1997, except for Note 10 as to which the date is May 1, 1997, on our audits of
the financial statements of National Advertising Company as of December 31, 1996
and 1995 and for the three years ended December 31, 1996, which report is
included in this Current Report on Form 8-K of Outdoor Systems, Inc.








COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Chicago, Illinois
August 28, 1997
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**AMERICAN      TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                               |                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                    | /s/                Thomas E. Durkin, III |
|   |                                                                                    |
|   | President(Principal                Executive and Financial                Officer) |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,018,043
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,199,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,600
<INVENTORY>                                    718,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,993,401
<PP&E>                                      12,998,829
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,849,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,260,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,079,591
<BONDS>                                        738,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        166
<COMMON>                                           588
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,942,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,260,907
<SALES>                                      5,464,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,464,834
<CGS>                                        4,450,544
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,450,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,004,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             591,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,546,752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,546,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (345,247)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                293,663
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,598,336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.31)
        

</TABLE>