TITLE>f20f12

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC 20549



FORM 20-F



[ ]	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

OR

[ ]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS "13" OR "15(d)" OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended

OR

[x]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from November 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001

Commission file number:



STREAM COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, INC.

________________________________________________________________________

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Not Applicable

(Translation of registrant's name into English)



British Columbia, Canada

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)



Suite 1020 - 400 Burrard Street

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3A6

(Address of principal executive offices)

__________

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

Common Shares without par value.

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None.

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

27,666,379 common shares at December 31, 2001

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes: ___



Indicate by checkmark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

Item 17

FORM 20-F



INDEX

CONVERSION TABLE

GLOSSARY OF NAMES AND TERMS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

PART 1

Item 1 - Identity Of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

A. Directors and Senior Management5

B. Advisers6

C. Auditors6

Item 2 - Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable7

Item 3 - Key Information7

A. Selected Financial Data7

Financial Highlights7

Exchange Rates8

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness9

C. Risk Factors10

History of losses, likelihood of future losses and dependence on additional financing10

Further acquisitions of cable television businesses10

Competition11

Agreements with TPSA11

Loss of key personnel12

Regulation and permitting requirements12

Currency risk12

Dilution of share capital12

No dividends13

Conflicts between the interests of large shareholders and minority shareholders13

Shares not currently actively traded13

Shareholders' rights are different in Canadian corporations13

Holders of our shares may not be able to obtain enforcement of civil liabilities13

We are subject to Canadian taxation14

Risk of "Penny Stock"14

Risks relating to our investments in Poland14

General14

Economic conditions in Poland15

Our business is subject to an evolving Polish tax system15

Item 4 - Information on the Company15

General15

Office Space in Canada17

Stream Communications Sp. z o.o.18

Overview18

History of Stream Cable TV18

Stream Cable TV's ownership of Bielsat.com19

Stream Cable TV's acquisition of certain assets of Elektromontaz19

Stream Cable TV's ownership of MTK19

Stream Cable TV's ownership of Gim-Sat19

Stream Cable TV's Business Strategy20

Background to the Polish Telecommunications Market20

Marketing and Sales22

Customer Service22

Maintenance22

Billing and Credit Control23

Stream Cable TV's Technology23

Services and Fees23

Regulatory Environment24

Radio and Television Act24

Copyrights Act25

Telecommunications Act26

Competition and consumer protection26

Steam Cable TV's Organization, Management and Personnel28

Stream Cable TV Locations29

Competition to Stream Cable TV29

Office30

International Eco-Waste Systems S.A.30

Overview of Eco-Waste30

History30

Management and Employees31

Environmental Regulations32

Office32

Real Estate32

PolVoice.com Sp. z o.o.33

Telephony and Internet Provider in Poland33

History33

EES Waste Solutions Ltd.33

General and Economic Conditions in the Republic of Poland33

Item 5 - Operating and Financing Review and Prospects34

Overview34

Results of Operations35

Differences Between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements36

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Subsequent Events36

ITEM 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees37

Directors and Senior Management38

Executive Compensation41

ITEM 7 - Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions46

Major Shareholders46

Related Party Transactions47

ITEM 8 - Financial Information48

Legal Proceedings48

ITEM 9 - The Listing48

Item 10 - Additional Information50

Share Capital50

Memorandum and Articles of Association52

Exchange Control and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders55

Taxation - Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences to United States Investors55

Taxation in Poland57

Statement by Experts59

Documents on Display59

Item 11 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk59

Currency and Exchange Rate Risk59

Item 12 - Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities60

Warrants60

PART II

ITEM 13 - Defaults, Dividends, Arrearages and Delinquencies

ITEM 14 - Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

PART III

ITEM 17 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 18 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 19 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

Financial Statements62

Exhibits





CONVERSION TABLE

For ease of reference, the following conversion factors are provided:



|1 mile = 1.6093 kilometres | 1 metric ton (tonne) = 2,205 pounds    
|-------------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|1 foot - 0.305 metres      | 1 troy ounce = 31.103 grams            
|1 acre = 0.4047 hectare    | 1 imperial gallon = 4.546 litres       
|1 long ton = 2,240 pounds  | 1 imperial gallon = 1.2010 U.S. gallons





GLOSSARY OF NAMES AND TERMS

|                        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Broadband               | Broadband refers to telecommunication that provides multiple channels of data over a single communications medium, typically using some form of frequency or wave division                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|BSE ("Mad Cow Disease") | Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) is a fatal brain disease of cattle. BSE was first observed in Great Britain in April 1985, and was specifically diagnosed in 1986. By June 1990, there were some 14,000 confirmed cases out of an estimated population of 10 million cattle in Great Britain. Since 1986, more than 173,000 cases of BSE in cattle have been identified in Britain. The epidemic peaked in 1992-93 at almost 1,000 cases per week. Control measures have reduced incidence and currently, less than 100 cases are being reported per week. The disease has been reported in domestic cattle in Ireland (337 cases), France (51), Portugal (195), Switzerland (283), and in cattle exported from England to Oman (2), the Falkland Islands (1), Germany (6), Denmark (1), Canada (1), and Italy (2). (Nature) 1996 382:4)                                                                                             
|CATV                    | Community Antenna Television, the original name for Cable TV.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|Coaxial cable           | Coaxial cable is called "coaxial" because it includes one physical channel that carries the signal surrounded (after a layer of insulation) by another concentric physical channel, both running along the same axis. The outer channel serves as a ground. Many of these cables or pairs of coaxial tubes can be placed in a single outer sheathing and, with repeaters, can carry information for a great distance.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|Czestochowa             | A city of southern Poland north of Katowice. It is heavily industrialized. Population, 246,600                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|Digital                 | Describes any system based on discontinuous data or events. Computers are digital machines because at their most basic level they can distinguish between just two values, 0 and 1, or off and on. There is no simple way to represent all the values in between, such as 0.25. All data that a computer processes must be encoded digitally, as a series of zeroes and ones. The opposite of digital is analog. A typical analog device is a clock in which the hands move continuously around the face. Such a clock is capable of indicating every possible time of day. In contrast, a digital clock is capable of representing only a finite number of times (every tenth of a second, for example).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|EU (European Union)     | An economic association of European countries founded by the Treaty of Rome in 1957 as a common market for six nations. It was known as the European Community until January 1, 1994 and currently comprises 15 European countries. Its goals are a single market for goods and services without any economic barriers, and a common currency with one monetary authority. The 15 countries are, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|Euro                    | The basic unit of currency among participating European Union countries.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|GSM                     | Global System for Mobile communications. A world standard for digital cellular communications using narrowband TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access), which allows up to eight calls at a time on 800 MHz and 1800 MHz frequencies. Introduced in 1991, it is the standard most commonly used in Europe and Asia, but not in the United States.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|Headend                 | A headend is the originating point of a signal in a cable television system. Headend equipment receives satellite and local broadcast TV signals and converts them to a form that can travel down coaxial cable to subscribers.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|HFC                     | A hybrid fibre coaxial (HFC) network is a telecommunication technology in which optical fibre (glass or plastic wire) cable and coaxial cable are used in different portions of a network to carry broadband content (such as video, data, and voice). Using HFC, a local CATV company installs fibre optic cable from the cable head-end (distribution center) to serving nodes located close to business and residential users and from these nodes uses coaxial cable to individual businesses and homes. An advantage of HFC is that some of the characteristics of fibre optic cable can be brought close to the user without having to replace the existing coaxial cable that is installed all the way to the home and business.
Both cable TV and telephone companies are using HFC in new and upgraded networks and, in some cases, sharing the same infrastructure to carry both video and voice conversations in the same system.
|ISDN                    | Integrated Services Digital Network, a fast method of service access and transferring data world-wide and an international communications standard for sending voice, video, and data over digital telephone lines or normal telephone wires.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|ISO 9001                | ISO 9001 is one of a series of three international standards for quality systems that can be used for external quality assurance purposes. These standards specify quality system requirements for use where a contract between two parties requires the demonstration of a supplier's capability. ISO 9001 is a model for quality assurance systems in design, development, production, installation and servicing. It is appropriate when conformance to specified requirements is to be assured by the supplier during several phases of activity that may include design, development, production, installation and servicing.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|Katowice                | A city of southern Poland west-northwest of Krakow. Chartered in 1865, it is an important mining and industrial center. Population, 363,300.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|Krakow                  | A city of southern Poland on the Vistula River south-southeast of Warsaw. Founded in the eighth century A.D., it was the national capital from 1305 to 1595. Population, 740,300.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|Rawa Mazowiecka         | A municipality located in the central river basin of the Vistula River 70 km from Warsaw located along transportation lines running from Warsaw to Lodz and from Warsaw to Katowice and Prague.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|Rzeszów                 | A city, capital of Rzeszów Province in southeastern Poland.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|Siedlce                 | A city, the capital of Siedlce province, in east central Poland. It is an economic centre for the southeastern section of the province, with food processing, textile milling, and toy production. It lies on the Warsaw-Moscow road and rail line.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|Silesia                 | Region in Southwest Poland bordering on the Sudety Mountains                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|Szczecin                | A city of northwest Poland near the mouth of the Oder River. It was ruled by Sweden from 1648 to 1720, when it was ceded to Prussia. After World War II the city became part of Poland. Population, 390,800.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|Torun                   | a city, the capital of Torun province, in north-central Poland, on the Vistula River. A river port, rail and road junction, and cultural centre, it is the birthplace (1473) of the astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|Voice mail              | A computerized system for receiving, recording, and sometimes forwarding audio messages. A voice mail system plays a pre-recorded message to the caller when the line is not answered, and may provide choices such as paging, talking to an operator, or selecting a number by touchtone to choose between message boxes.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|VOIP                    | An acronym for Voice Over IP. An emerging technology, voice delivered using the Internet Protocol, is a term used in IP telephony for a set of facilities for managing the delivery of voice information using the Internet Protocol (IP). In general, this means sending voice information in digital form in discrete packets rather than in the traditional circuit committed protocols of the public switched telephone network. A major advantage of VOIP and Internet telephony is that it avoids the tolls charged by ordinary telephone service.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|Warsaw                  | The capital of Poland, in the east-central part of the country on the Vistula River. Founded in the 13th century, it replaced Kraków as Poland's capital in 1596. Warsaw was ruled by Russia as an independent kingdom (1815-1917) and became capital of Poland again in 1918. Warsaw was rebuilt after 1945 and is today a major cultural, commercial, and industrial center. Population: 1,654,491.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|Wroclaw                 | A city of southwest Poland on the Oder River, assigned to Poland by the Potsdam Conference (1945). Population, 636,000.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Stream Communications Network, Inc. ("we", "us" and "our", as the context requires) (the "Company") cautions you that certain important factors (including without limitation those set forth in our Form 20-F) may affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements that may be deemed to have been made in this Form 20-F annual statement, or that are otherwise made by us or on our behalf. For this purpose, any statements contained in this annual statement that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as "may," "except," believe," anticipate," "intend," "could," estimate," or "continue," or the negative or other variations of comparable terminology, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.



PART 1

Item 1- Identity Of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers



A. Directors and Senior Management

The following table sets forth the name, business address and position of each of our directors and executive officers:

| | Position                                           |  | Name and Business Address                                                                 
| | -------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Chairman of the Board                              |  | Edward MazurGlenview, Illinois
60025
United States                                        
| | President/CEO/Director                             |  | Stanislaw LisSuite 1020 - 400 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3A6
Canada     
| | Secretary/Director                                 |  | Iwona KozakSuite 1020 - 400 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3A6
Canada       
| | Director                                           |  | Glenn LittleSuite 1020 - 400 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3A6
Canada      
| | Chief Financial Officer                            |  | Casey Forward, CGASuite 1020 - 400 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3A6
Canada
| | Vice-President Business Development/ Director      |  | Grzegorz Namyslowski14 Obroncow Street
03-933 Warsaw Poland                               
| | Vice-President Strategic and Corporate Development |  | Chuck CorrellSuite 1020 - 400 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3A6
Canada     



B. Advisers

The following table sets forth the name, business address of our key advisers:

| | Position       |  | Name and Business Address                                                                                                                                 
| | -------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                |  |                                                                                                                                                           
| | Bankers        |  | Bank of MontrealFirst Bank Tower
595 Burrard Street
Vancouver, British Columbia, V7X 1L7
Canada                                                           
| |                |  | Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A.5th Branch
Ul. Jerozolimskie 65/79
00-950 Warsaw, Poland                                                                      
| |                |  | Citibank Poland S.A.Senatorska 16
00-923 Warsaw, Poland                                                                                                   
| |                |  | Bank PKO B.P.4th Branch
Kraków, Poland                                                                                                                    
| | Legal Advisers |  | Stikeman ElliottSuite 1700 - Park Place
666 Burrard Street
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2X8
Canada                                                    
| |                |  | Kancelaria Adowokacka, Marta Szymanek,
Ul. Jerozolimskie 30, 00-024
Warszawa, Poland.
Norton Rose
Piotr Strawa i Wspólnicy
Ul. Królewska 14, 00-065
Warsaw



C. Auditors

The following table sets forth the name, business address and position of our auditors:

| | Position |  | Name and Business Address                                                                     
| | -------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Canada   |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP601 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6B 5A5
Canada
| | Poland   |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o.Ul. Nowogrodzka 68
02-014 Warszaw
Poland                     



Item 2 - Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable





Not applicable





Item 3 - Key Information

A. Selected Financial Data

Financial Highlights



The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data for the two months ended December 31, 2001 and the four years ended October 31, 2001 prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("Canadian GAAP"). The table also summarizes certain corresponding information prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"). This selected consolidated financial data include the accounts of our parent and our subsidiaries.

|                                                     | Two months ended December 31, 2001 | Years ended October 31
|---------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------
|                                                     | 2001                               | 2000                  
|                                                     | $CDN                               | $CDN                  
|Revenues                                             | 639,871                            | 2,079,504             
|Net income (loss) from continuing operations         |                                    |                       
|Canadian GAAP                                        | (773,491)                          | (2,301,619)           
|US GAAP                                              | (773,491)                          | (2,301,619)           
|Net income (loss) from discontinued operations       |                                    |                       
|Canadian GAAP                                        | (267,198)                          | (2,231,941)           
|US GAAP                                              | (267,198)                          | (2,231,941)           
|Income (loss) per share                              |                                    |                       
|Canadian GAAP                                        | (0.05)                             | (0.21)                
|US GAAP                                              | (0.05)                             | (0.16)                
|Total assets                                         |                                    |                       
|Canadian GAAP                                        | 16,222,495                         | 15,055,326            
|US GAAP                                              | 16,222,495                         | 15,055,326            
|Net assets                                           |                                    |                       
|Canadian GAAP                                        | 13,375,490                         | 12,724,982            
|US GAAP                                              | 13,375,490                         | 12,724,982            
|Long-term debt                                       | -                                  | -                     
|Capital stock                                        | 26,110,367                         | 21,310,084            
|Cash dividends declared                              | -                                  | -                     
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 22,163,416                         | 21,837,002            



Exchange Rates

In this report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars ("CDN"). Equivalents will be given in U.S. dollars ("USD") or Polish zloty ("PLN"), or Canadian dollars where the first currency stated indicates that a contract, a fee or agreement was made pursuant to a currency other than the Canadian dollar.

Since June 1, 1970, the Government of Canada has permitted a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. The high and low exchange rates, the average rates (average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period) and the end of the period rates for Canadian dollars, expressed in U.S. dollars, from November 1, 1998 to December 31, 2001 were as follows:

U.S. DOLLARS PER $1.00 (CDN.)



|              | Two months ended December 31, 2001 | Years ended October 31
|------------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------
|2001          | 2000                               | 1999                  
|High          | .6418                              | .6714                 
|Low           | .6227                              | .6316                 
|Average       | .6306                              | .6498                 
|End of Period | .6287                              | .6340                 





The high and low exchange rates for Canadian dollars, expressed in U.S. dollars, for each month from January 1, 2002 to April 30, 2002 were as follows:

U.S. DOLLARS PER $1.00 (CDN.)

Monthly



|     | January
2002 | February
2002 | March
2002 | April
2002
|---- | ------------ | ------------- | ---------- | ----------
|High | .6316        | .6322         | .6355      | .6410     
|Low  | .6175        | .6200         | .6209      | .6239     







In this report, several references are made to business in Poland and the Polish currency, the zloty. The high and low exchange rates, the average rates (average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period) and the end of the period rates for Polish zloty (zloty), expressed in U.S. dollars, from November 1, 1998 to December 31, 2001 were as follows:

U.S. DOLLARS PER 1 POLISH ZLOTY (zloty)



|              | Two months ended December 31, 2001 | Years ended October 31
|------------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------
|2001          | 2000                               | 1999                  
|High          | .2538                              | .2549                 
|Low           | .2428                              | .2132                 
|Average       | .2468                              | .2410                 
|End of Period | .2518                              | .2450                 



The high and low exchange rates for Polish zloty, expressed in U.S. dollars, for each month from January 31, 2002 to April 30, 2002 were as follows:

U.S. DOLLARS PER 1 POLISH ZLOTY (zloty)

Monthly



|     | January
2002 | February
2002 | March
2002 | April
2002
|---- | ------------ | ------------- | ---------- | ----------
|High | .2546        | .2443         | .2445      | .2520     
|Low  | .2365        | .2325         | .2359      | .2425     



On May 7, 2002 the Canadian dollar and the Polish zloty closed at the following rates:



$1.00 USD		= 3.9519 Polish Zloty (zloty)



B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

The following table sets forth our consolidated capitalization and indebtedness as at March 31, 2002.



|                                                                             | As at March 31, 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------
|                                                                             | $CDN                
|                                                                             |                     
|Short term debt                                                              | $2,449,259          
|Long term debt                                                               | -                   
|Total debt                                                                   | $1,956,946          
|Shareholders' equity                                                         |                     
|Common shares - issued (including contributed surplus and value of warrants) | 32,365,076          
|Deficit                                                                      | (19,049,335)        
|Other comprehensive income                                                   | 853,146             
|Total shareholders' equity                                                   | 14,168,887          
|                                                                             |                     
|Total capitalization                                                         | $16,618,146         

C. Risk Factors

History of losses, likelihood of future losses and dependence on additional financing

We have not been profitable in the past. The aggregate of our net losses (accumulated deficit) of $17,781,190 CDN to December 31, 2001, has been financed by private placements and the exercise of stock options and warrants. We may not be profitable in the future.

Our strategy involves significant expansion of our existing operations through both acquisitions and organic growth. The continued development and improvement of our business will require substantial amounts of additional financing. If we are unable to secure such financing on acceptable terms and on a timely basis, our financial results may be adversely affected.

In addition, our future prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered in establishing new businesses, which can be characterised by intense competition and rapidly changing events. Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern in the auditors' report for the two months ended December 31, 2001 and the year ended October 31, 2001, and we have discussed this issue in footnote 1 to our financial statements. The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, however, indicating that the concern is not a probability, but a possibility.

There can be no assurance that our financial plans will be achieved.



Further acquisitions of cable television businesses

The completion of acquisitions and the integration of acquired cable television businesses constitutes a material part of our growth strategy. We continuously review potential acquisitions (although as of the date hereof we have no agreements to make any acquisitions). A detailed assessment of the financial position, profitability and return on investment of a potential target, of acquisition costs, and of the costs related to the integration of these businesses form an essential element of our due diligence. Nonetheless, these additional acquisitions and integration efforts could significantly divert the resources and attention of management from our ongoing operations. It may be necessary to invest additional capital to expand or upgrade the networks of the acquired operations. We cannot ensure that any further acquisitions will be completed in a timely manner or at all or on terms and conditions ultimately favourable or acceptable to us. Any unanticipated difficulties in acquiring potential targets and their networks or in integrating an acquired business in our operations may result in unanticipated expenditures and in the frustration of our development strategy and may adversely affect our financial results.



Competition

We operate in markets that are open to a variety of competitors, including large, well-established companies in the cable and satellite television and internet access businesses, among others. The current legal environment makes it possible for competitors to build parallel and competing networks in the same regions in which we operate. Currently, less than 10% of our aggregate networks are overbuilt by our competitors. Therefore, even where our competitors operate in the same markets as we do, these competitors are typically not wiring the same subscribers as we do. However, if competitors are willing to significantly overbuild our networks and are able to obtain programming that is appealing to subscribers at reasonable costs and we are unable to do so, our business may be materially adversely affected.

In addition, the cable television and internet access businesses are subject to rapid and significant changes in technology. Currently, no single method of television signal transmission dominates in Poland. Rapid technological changes and the profitability of transmission technology other than cable may adversely affect our business.

If competitors with a large market share, such as TPSA, offer comparable internet access services at a lower cost than we do, our business would be harmed.

Furthermore, some of our existing and potential competitors are significantly larger than us, and some have significantly more access to capital than we do. Our business may be adversely affected if such competitors are able to grow their networks more quickly than we can or are able to successfully compete with us for acquisition targets. In addition, cable television and internet access technology changes quickly, and our business may be harmed if our competitors with more access to capital are able to take advantage of such new technologies and we are not able to do so.

Agreements with TPSA

Approximately 25% of our network has been constructed using pre-existing conduits of TPSA. Our agreements with TPSA provide that we may use TPSA conduits to offer our services through our own network and to upgrade, repair and maintain our network.

TPSA also maintains a small cable TV business and is one of the top providers of internet access services in our market. TPSA is, therefore, one of our competitors. Our agreements with TPSA permit TPSA to terminate these agreements without penalty at any time either immediately (upon the occurrence of certain conditions) or upon three to six months' notice (without cause). If these agreements were terminated, we could be prevented, for a period of time, from accessing our network and would have to make significant expenditures to build or lease alternative conduits, adversely affecting our business and financial results.

Loss of key personnel

We compete with other cable television providers for qualified operating, sales, marketing, administrative and technical personnel. Our success will significantly depend upon our ability to hire and retain such personnel. We may not be able to attract, recruit and retain sufficient qualified personnel. Furthermore, we are currently managed by a small number of key management and operating personnel. Our business success depends significantly on the efforts and abilities of these individuals. If we were to lose the services of key management and operating personnel, our business would be negatively affected.

Regulation and permitting requirements

Cable television operators in Poland are regulated by various governmental bodies and are required to comply with intellectual property rights protections.

Our telecommunication approvals have been granted for the next 10 years (from 2002), and all of our existing channels and programs have been registered for the maximum allowable period of three years. The National Council for Radio and Television ("KRRiT") has the authority to reject applications to extend existing programming licenses or the registration future programming if the programming violates any provision of the Polish Television Act. If KRRiT were to refuse to extend our existing operating and programming licenses or reject any of our future programming applications, our business would be materially adversely affected.

Existing laws and regulations, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, affecting our business may change. Some changes, including changes in connection with Poland's accession to the European Union, may have an adverse effect on our business. New laws and regulations may regulate the prices we can charge for providing cable television or internet access services or the level of fees we are required to pay to organisations for the collective copyright administration and protection, among other changes.

Currency risk

We do not hedge currency risk. Our revenues are generated in zlotys, while our programming costs (constituting 18% compared to our revenues in 2001), our expenditures for technical equipment purchases and our expenditures for the construction and maintenance of cable networks, among certain other costs, are denominated in foreign currencies. Accordingly, significant fluctuations of the zloty in relation to those currencies may adversely affect our business and our financial results.

Dilution of share capital

As at April 18, 2002, there exist options to purchase a total of 4,370,000 of our shares and warrants to purchase an additional 5,447,351 shares (9,817,351 shares in total). If all of these options and warrants were exercised, shares issued as a result of such exercise would constitute 25.97% of all of our outstanding shares. The exercise of these options and warrants and the resale of the resulting shares on a public market may adversely affect the market price of our shares and our ability to raise future equity financing upon favourable terms.

As of April 18, 2002, our constituent documents authorise the issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock. Consistent with our strategy, we may issue some or all of such shares to acquire one or more businesses or other types of property or to provide additional financing. In addition, we may grant additional options and issue additional warrants in the future. The issuance of those shares may result in a reduction of the market price of our outstanding shares. The issuance of any additional shares will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other shareholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a change of our voting control.

No dividends

In the past, we have not paid any dividends to our shareholders in any form. We do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Conflicts between the interests of large shareholders and minority shareholders

It is possible that a holder of a large number of our shares will be able to control (individually or jointly with others) our activities or exert a significant influence on our governing bodies or our business, including the ability to effect changes to our constituent documents and other material issues.

There presently is no shareholder able to exercise such control. However, the concentration of share ownership in the hands of a few shareholders in the future may make it impossible, without the consent of such shareholders, to effect a change in control or to appoint or remove a director. Possible conflicts among shareholders holding large numbers of our shares and possible conflicts between such shareholders and minority shareholders may adversely affect us.

Shares not currently actively traded

Our common shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. The rules of this exchange require a trading halt when a company has a change of business. At the present time our stock is halted from trading on the TSX Venture Exchange resulting from a change of business.

The requirements of the exchange are varied and a change of business may take several months to complete. A company wishing to remain trading on the TSX Venture Exchange must comply with this policy. We are currently seeking alternative exchanges. We cannot be certain if or when this process may be completed and when our shares would be reinstated for trading on any exchange. This can cause shareholders liquidity problems without an exchange to trade their shares and uncertainty as to the share price.

Shareholders' rights are different in Canadian corporations

We are a corporation incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. The rights of holders of our shares are governed by the laws of the province of British Columbia and the federal laws of Canada and by our constituent documents. These rights may differ in certain respects from the rights of shareholders in the United States.

Holders of our shares may not be able to obtain enforcement of civil liabilities

While many of our assets are located in Poland, a majority of the members of our board of directors and officers are residents of countries other than Poland (primarily Canada). As a result, it may be more difficult for holders of our shares to effect service of process on us, our directors and our officers and to enforce against us, our assets or these persons any judgements in civil and commercial matters. In addition, a Canadian court may not permit holders of our shares to enforce in Canada a judgement by a non-Canadian court related to claims under securities or other laws or otherwise related to their ownership of our shares. Canada is not a signatory to the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgements in Civil and Commercial Matters.

We are subject to Canadian taxation

As a British Columbia corporation, we, our income, and our dividend payments to our shareholder are subject to Canadian tax laws and regulations. Depending on the jurisdiction of residence of our investors and on tax treaties, laws and regulations applicable to them, our investors may be subject, directly or indirectly, to various Canadian tax laws and regulations. We advise our investors to contact their tax advisors to determine how the tax laws and regulations of Canada and other jurisdictions applicable to them apply to them and their investments in us.

Risk of "Penny Stock"

The disclosure requirements often have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules, and accordingly, investors may find it difficult to sell their shares, if at all.

Our common stock may be deemed to be "penny stock" as that term is defined in Reg. Section 240.3a51-1 of the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Penny stocks are stocks (i) with a price of less than five dollars per share; (ii) that are not traded on a "recognised" national exchange; (iii) whose prices are not quoted on the NASDAQ automated quotation system (NASDAQ listed stocks must still meet requirement (i) above); or (iv) in issuers with net tangible assets less than $2,000,000 USD (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years) or $5,000,000 USD (if in continuous operation for less than three years), or with average revenues of less than $6,000,000 USD for the last three years.

Section 15(g) of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Reg. Section 240.15g(c) 2 of the US Securities and Exchange Commission require broker dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor's account. Potential investors in our shares are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares that are deemed to be penny stock.

Moreover, Reg. Section 240.15g-9 of the US Securities and Exchange Commission requires broker dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor's financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them.

Risks relating to our investments in Poland

General

Companies that operate principally in Poland are subject to greater risks, including in some cases significant legal, political and economic risks, than companies operating in the United States or Canada. In addition, there may be events that impact emerging markets or Central and Eastern European markets other than Poland which are perceived to also impact Poland when in fact they do not.

Accordingly, particular care should be exercised in evaluating the risks relating to our investment in Poland and in deciding whether, in the light of those risks, an investment in our securities is appropriate. Generally, investments in companies which operate principally in Poland are only suitable for sophisticated investors who appreciate the significance of the risks involved. Investors should also note that, in countries such as Poland, market and other conditions are subject to rapid change. Therefore, the information set out in this document may become outdated quickly.

Economic conditions in Poland

Following its transition to a market economy and pluralist political system, Poland has experienced and will continue to experience significant economic and political changes that could affect us and our shareholders. The Polish economy has benefited from policies implemented by the Polish government since 1990, and these policies are likely to continue as Poland moves towards joining the EU, which is targeted for 2004. Nevertheless, if Poland, by popular referendum, approves the joining of the EU, short- and medium-term legal and regulatory changes and uncertainty may result. In addition, the Polish government, prior to Poland's joining the EU, may impose regulations that will be contrary to the EU framework which, if adopted, could have an adverse effect on our business.

Our business is dependent to a large extent on economic conditions in Poland, including on such factors as the growth of the Polish gross domestic product, interest rates, inflation, fluctuations between the zloty and other currencies (in particular the US Dollar and the Euro) and levels of personal income and unemployment. Any deterioration in the global economy or in business activity in Poland, as a result of global, regional, national or other factors, may adversely affect our ability to sell our services.

Polish businesses still have limited experience of operating in competitive market conditions. Accordingly, when compared to US or Canadian businesses, many Polish businesses have organisational structures that do not reflect competitive operating conditions. Although many companies in Poland are undergoing or have undergone significant organisational restructuring in order to succeed in a competitive operating environment, some ultimately may not be successful. If the Polish economy suffers because many Polish businesses are unsuccessful, our business may also be adversely affected.

Our business is subject to an evolving Polish tax system

Polish tax regulations have changed in recent years and as a result many tax regulations are either not the subject of firmly established interpretations or are subject to frequently changing interpretations. All of the foregoing results in a greater risk of tax non-compliance for a company operating in Poland than for companies operating in countries with more established tax systems. In addition, there exists a greater risk that the enforcement of penalties and sanctions will not be consistent. If we become subject to disputes with Polish tax authorities, our business might be adversely affected.



Item 4 - Information on the Company

General

We have three business interests in the country of Poland. Our principal business is providing cable TV.

We were incorporated on March 28, 1979 under the name of "Clear Mines Ltd." by registration of its Memorandum and Articles under the Company Act of British Columbia, Canada (the "British Columbia Company Act"). We consolidated our shares on a one new for 3.9 old shares basis and changed our name to "Redwood Resources Inc." on August 16, 1985. We again consolidated our shares on a one new for three old shares basis and changed our name to "Trooper Explorations Ltd." on May 29, 1992.

On May 4, 1995 we changed our name to "Trooper Technologies Inc." and on October 19, 2001 we changed our name to "Stream Communications Network, Inc.". We changed our year end from October 31 to December 31 starting in 2001.

Our authorized capital is 100,000,000 common shares without par value.

Our registered office is Suite 1700 - Park Place, 666 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2X8, Canada. Our agent in Poland is Kancelaria Adowokacka, Marta Szymanek, Ul. Al. Jerozolimskie 30, 00-024 Warszawa, Poland. Our principal offices are located at 1020 - 400 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3A6, Canada, telephone (604) 669-2826.

We have the following four subsidiaries:

1.	Stream Communications Sp. z o.o. ("Stream Cable TV") was incorporated on October 26, 1999, under the laws of Poland. We own a 100% interest in Stream Cable TV which is in the business of operating a cable television business in Poland. Stream Cable TV's growth is being accomplished through acquisitions of small, independent cable TV providers and through its own marketing efforts. Stream Cable TV is located at al. 29 Listopada 130, 31-406 Krakow, Poland;

2.	PolVoice.com Sp. z o.o. ("PolVoice") was organized on August 11, 1999, under the laws of Poland. We own a 95.5% interest in PolVoice. PolVoice is in the business of Internet, data transmission and a VOIP provider in Poland. PolVoice has created its proprietary software and network for transmission of VOIP and data transmission (documents, electronic mail, Internet). Ultimately PolVoice had plans to create a network of inter-city connections, intended for medium to large corporations. The company has decided that the operations of PolVoice do not fit with the main business of cable TV. Accordingly, subsequent to December 31, 2001, the operations were terminated and the entity is being liquidated. PolVoice is located at Ul. Walecznych 42/7, Warsaw, Poland;

3.	International Eco-Waste Systems S.A. ("Eco-Waste") a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company was incorporated on September 24, 1996under the laws of Poland. Eco-Waste was in the business of constructing and operating waste rendering plants in Poland. At present we have no operating plants or revenue from operations in Eco-Waste. Eco-Waste had begun the construction of the first modern rendering plant in Zabokliki, Poland and had planned to build two additional rendering plants in Poland. Since our main focus is cable TV, it has been decided that the business of Eco-Waste does not fit and accordingly we have entered into agreements to sell Eco-waste subsequent to December 31, 2001. Eco-Waste is located at Ul. Zloczowska 12 lol.3, 03-972 Warsaw, Poland; and

4.	EES Waste Solutions Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company was incorporated on July 11, 1996, under the laws of Cyprus, located at 3 Themistocles Dervis Street, CY-1066 Nicosia, Cyprus. EES Waste Solutions Ltd. is presently inactive. We have entered into agreements to sell this entity along with Eco-Waste subsequent to December 31, 2001.

We are a reporting issuer in the Province of British Columbia, Canada and our common shares are listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the trading symbol "TPP". The rules of this exchange require a trading halt when a company has a change of business. At the present time our stock is halted from trading on the TSX Venture Exchange resulting from a change of business.

The following diagram sets out the intercorporate relationship between our Company and its subsidiaries:



|                                     |      |                          | Stream Communications Network, Inc. |     |                                  |                                     
|------------------------------------ | ---- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                                     |      |                          |                                     |     |                                 
|                                     |      |                          |                                     |     |                                  |                                     
|                                     | 100% |                          |                                     |     |                                  |                                     
|International Eco-Waste Systems S.A. |      |                          |                                     |     |                                  |                                     
|                                     |      |                          | 100%                                |     |                                  |                                     
|                                     |      | EES Waste Solutions Ltd. |                                     |     | Stream Communications
Sp. z o.o. |                                     
|                                     |      |                          |                                     |     |                                 
|                                     |      |                          |                                     |    
|                                     |      |                          |                                     |     |                                  |                                     
|                                     |      |                          |                                     | 51% |                                  | 100%                                
|                                     |      |                          | Bielsat.com Sp. z o.o.              |     |                                  | Miejska Telewizja Kablowa Sp. z o.o.



Office Space in Canada

We utilize about 2,500 square feet of office space in Vancouver, British Columbia. Our rent is $3,425 CDN per month increasing 6% per annum in October of each year until May 2009. In addition, we pay $2,580 CDN per month for maintenance and utilities and $7,820 CDN per month for office support that includes a photocopier, telephones, a fax machine, computers, printers, scanners, secretarial services, reception services and consumables.

Stream Communications Sp. z o.o.

Overview

Stream Cable TV provides cable television services and high-speed Internet access in the Southern Polish provinces of Śląskie, Małopolskie, Świętokrzyskie and

Stream Cable TV intends to continue developing its cable television business aggressively, principally through acquisitions and also by securing new subscribers from among the residences already passed by Stream Cable TV's networks and through build-out to nearby residences. Stream Cable TV has not incurred any debt while funding its growth and operations from equity issues. Management of Stream Cable TV possesses experience and cable-business expertise, and in particular knowledge of its local target markets.

History of Stream Cable TV

In October 1999, Stream Cable TV was established wherein we acquired a 49% interest for total consideration of $196,000 zloty ($46,629 USD, $68,561 CDN). On January 1, 2001, a change of the Polish telecommunication law allowed foreign ownership to be unlimited. On January 15, 2001, the Company purchased from the other shareholders the balance of issued shares (51%) in Stream Cable TV making Stream Cable TV wholly owned (100%) by the Company. The sum of $97,000 USD ($145,785 CDN, 397,603 zloty) was paid to Castle Holdings Ltd., Adam Wójcik and Dobroslaw Ploskonka, related parties to the Company, as a reimbursement of cost for their acquisition cost for their shares in Stream Cable TV.

Under the direction of Adam Wójcik, a team of marketing, technical and sales people was assembled to implement, market, sell and maintain cable television services in Southern Poland.

Stream Cable TV has been able to improve operational performance of the networks it has acquired primarily by closing local offices that provide duplicative functions and by moving all customer information onto its central subscriber, billing and service database. Additionally, most management functions are centralised while keeping customer care functions decentralised.

Since then, Stream Cable TV has made a number of acquisitions which have been successfully integrated into its core business. The most significant of these acquisitions were those of Bielsat.com Sp. z o.o. ("Bielsat.com"), a portion of the assets of Elektromontaz Rzeszów S.A. ("Elektromontaz"), Miejska Telewizja Kablowa Sp z o.o. ("MTK"), and GimSat Sp z o.o.("Gimsat"). These are discussed in turn.

These acquisitions include:

|Name of Target                                        | Regions where Target
has Operated   | Year          
|----------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | --------------
|51% shares in Bielsat.com                             | Bielsko-Biata, Czechowice-Dziedzice | June 2000     
|A portion of the assets of Marsat S.C.                | Czêstochowa                         | July 2000     
|A portion of the assets of Telemedia Sp. z o.o.       | Czêstochowa                         | July 2000     
|A portion of the assets of Bister Sp. z o.o.          | Jaworzno,
Czechowice-Dziedzice      | August 2000   
|A portion of the assets of Elektromontaz Rzeszów S.A. | Rzeszów, Bochnia,
Sandomierz        | September 2000
|100% shares in MTK                                    | Czêstochowa                         | July 2001     
|A portion of the assets of AZART S.C.                 | Kielce, Busko                       | July 2001     
|0.21% shares in Gimsat                                | Jaslo, Sanok, Brzozów               | June 2001     

Stream Cable TV's ownership of Bielsat.com

Stream Cable TV is one of the founders of Bielsat.com. Since its formation on March 8, 2000, Stream Cable TV has been holding 51% of the shares in Bielsat.com The remaining 49% of the shares are owned by PPUH Bielsat Sp z o.o.

Stream Cable TV's acquisition of certain assets of Elektromontaz

On February 24, 2000, Stream Cable TV acquired cable TV network assets from Elektromontaz. The acquired assets consisted of an existing cable network, with its related equipment to provide cable television services, together with over 5,000 television cable subscribers.

Stream Cable TV's ownership of MTK

Since July 2, 2001, Stream Cable TV has been the sole shareholder of MTK. On January 11, 2002, Stream Cable TV merged with MTK, Stream Cable TV being the survivor. The merger was effected without a capital increase being required under Polish law. The proceedings to register the merger with the Polish National Court Register are in progress but have not yet been concluded. The merger will be effective upon the National Court Register's final registration of the merger.

Stream Cable TV's ownership of Gimsat

On June 5, 2001, Stream Cable TV and Gimsat shareholders concluded a preliminary purchase and sale agreement by which Stream Cable TV would acquire the remaining 99.79% of Gimsat shares. This preliminary agreement contemplates the consummation of the purchase and sale to occur on or before June 30, 2003. Pursuant to the preliminary agreement an irrevocable power of attorney covering 99.79% of Gimsat's shares and a registered pledge agreement covering 99.79% of Gimsat's shares secures the repayment of Stream Cable TV's advance in the event the purchase of Gimsat does not close on or before June 30, 2003. As of December 31, 2001, however, no final purchase and sale agreement has been signed.

As at December 27, 2001, Stream Cable TV had advanced a total sum of 8,694,010 zloty (CDN $3.5 million; USD $2.2 million) to the Gimsat shareholders. With the increased amounts paid, the Gimsat owners agreed that the board of Gimsat could be changed and on January 1, 2002, the board of Gimsat was changed and composed entirely of Stream Cable TV members.

In connection with these transactions, Gimsat terminated its customer relationships with its subscribers and Stream Cable TV signed up 12,300 of Gimsat's subscribers, which number constitutes most of Gimsat's terminated subscribers. Stream Cable TV rents this cable network from Gimsat.

Stream Cable TV's Business Strategy

Stream Cable TV's goal is to become one of the leading cable television and internet service providers in Poland Its strategies to achieve this objective include:

Growth of subscriber base.

Stream Cable TV intends to increase its subscriber base principally through acquisitions of operators, and subsequently to increase the penetration of these networks by improved marketing. Stream Cable TV has already made eight successful acquisitions as part of this strategy.

Growth of revenues per user.

Stream Cable TV plans to grow the revenues it receives from its existing customers by: (i) encouraging them to subscribe for more expensive cable television packages (by seeking to continually improve the quality of its program offerings at higher tiers), (ii) offering high-speed Internet access; and (iii) offering other services.

Regional focus.

Stream Cable TV targets the southeast of Poland owing to the high density of population and a relatively low build-out of cable television services in that area. Stream Cable TV will also remain opportunistic with regard to acquisition opportunities in other regions of Poland.

Upgrading of infrastructure.

Stream Cable TV is upgrading the infrastructure of acquired systems using the two-way high capacity HFC technology and by preparing its networks to transmit new services, including Internet access, pay-per-view and video-on-demand.

Professional management structure.

Stream Cable TV has an experienced management team that provides both local market knowledge and cable-operator expertise. Furthermore, Stream Cable TV is implementing a uniform management structure that is designed to achieve a high level of customer care by centralising management functions such as billing, while also keeping teams of marketing, customer service and network maintenance service professionals dedicated to local service areas.

Creation of a brand.

Stream Cable TV is standardising its channel offerings and pricing structures across all acquired networks which will help build a brand that may be more effectively marketed.

Most of the above-described actions do not require substantial expenditure and will be financed by operating revenues. We anticipate that we will undertake additional issuances of shares if Stream Cable TV identifies other attractive cable television systems, the purchase of which would enhance our goodwill.

Background to the Polish Telecommunications Market

The Polish Cable Television Industry

Prior to 1989, during the Communist political regime, the Polish government controlled and regulated the television industry. All frequency usage and channel offerings were limited principally to government broadcast programs. In the early years of the post-Communist era, there was no effective regulatory authority. This led to a proliferation of small cable operators building low-cost, poorly constructed cable systems in densely populated urban areas of Poland.

In more recent years, due in part to the growth of the economy and to the promulgation of cable industry regulations that have helped attract quality programming to Poland, the cable industry has developed rapidly, including through the entry of large cable operators, such as @Entertainment and UPC (United Pan-Europe Communications), that have constructed high-quality cable systems with numerous channel offerings.

Nevertheless, the Polish cable market remains underdeveloped. As of 31 December 2001 there were approximately 4.35 million cable subscribers in Poland, out of 12.5 million television households. The Company believes that there are a considerable number of unserved locations in Poland, particularly in urban areas, that would be suitable for the construction of cable television networks and the provision of cable television services. Average monthly salaries as of December 31, 2001 are approximately PLN 2061 (approximately US$503), while the average monthly cable subscription rates of the five biggest Polish cable operators (including VAT) is PLN 39.00 (approximately US$9.51).

In addition, we believe that there is significant potential for further consolidation among Polish cable television providers. We believe that currently the top 12 operators (including Stream Cable TV) control approximately 60% of the built-out market, with the remaining 40% serviced by roughly 600 operators. We expect consolidation among these providers, particularly as smaller operators face the burden of compliance with regulations that set minimum technical standards for cable television networks and require payment for programming produced by others.

Polish Cable Television Characteristics

Poland is Europe's seventh largest cable television market. Poland is also the largest single-language market in Central Europe. We believe that there are several reasons why Poland represents a favourable market for the provision of multi-channel cable services. Several characteristics that distinguish the Polish cable market from other cable markets include:

(a) Viewer Demand

Poland has one of the highest television viewing rates in the world, despite generally poor-quality reception and limited programming choices. In 2001, each Polish family, taken together, watched an average of approximately 279 minutes (over four and a half hours) of television per day per household, as compared with averages of 263 minutes and 177 minutes per day per household in the United States and Germany, respectively.

(b) Network Density

Poland is one of the most densely populated countries in Central Europe. The housing market in Poland's urban areas is characterized by multiple dwelling units ("MDUs"). Many MDUs are owned or controlled by co-operatives, municipalities or private owners which frequently own a number of MDUs. So far the strategy of cable television operators in Poland has generally been to cover only MDUs with their networks. This strategy arises from a high level of network density (i.e. the number of homes passed per 1 kilometre of the network) which results in extremely low build costs per subscriber. Currently the average network density for Stream Cable TV is about 390 homes passed per kilometre of cable. By comparison, the average network density in the United States is 48 homes per kilometre of cable. Such high network density offers marketing and other cost benefits in terms of targeting, attracting and servicing customers and collecting subscription fees.

(c) Building Access

In Poland the right to build cable television networks is acquired by agreement with the owners of a building and does not require a permit from any regulatory telecommunications authority. Under such agreements , the operator is generally permitted to connect to its network all apartments located in a given building. Such agreements are concluded by Stream Cable TV for periods varying from 10 to 20 years, which are capable of being extended.

(d) Customer Base

Stream Cable TV's customer base consists of middle-income families living in MDU's. Middle-income families living in MDU's account for approximately 70% of residential housing in all Polish cities, resulting from the relatively low cost of building cable television networks in locations with a high housing density. As at the end of March 2002, the overall penetration rate, measured by the number of subscribers of Stream Cable TV divided by the number of homes that have been passed by its networks, is approximately 70%. This current penetration rate reflects improvement resulting from an efficient integration of the acquired systems with Stream Cable TV's networks. Prior to their integration, the target companies had penetration rates ranging from 35% to 65%. Stream Cable TV has experienced average annual churn rates of approximately 13% in 2000 and approximately 8% in 2001. Stream Cable TV has a total of approximately 41, 000 subscribers on a consolidated basis.

Marketing and Sales

Most networks that Stream Cable TV has conducted no advertising or marketing activities. As a result, Stream Cable TV expects that it can gain many new subscribers from these existing networks through marketing alone without having to extend any further.

Stream Cable TV's marketing and sales strategy is currently delivered through the use of professionally trained salespeople working at seven permanent customer care and marketing offices and seasonal promotions of its services when Stream Cable TV obtains most of the clients. Stream Cable TV also uses a preview channel, information channel, promotional material mailed with monthly invoices and its website to inform its customers of existing and new programs and services. Stream Cable TV undertakes a number of additional marketing initiatives that are unusual for a company of Stream Cable TV's size, including market research, radio advertising, and newspaper advertising. All these initiatives serve to limit customer churn, to move customers into more expensive tiers of service and to build a positive image of Stream Cable TV.

Customer Service

Stream Cable TV provides a high level of customer care and service. Stream Cable TV operates a call centre and seven customer care and marketing offices which are linked to a centralised customer care, service, maintenance and billing database that provides any program and rate information, billing, service and maintenance updates and through which Stream Cable TV lodges installation, service and maintenance requests.

Maintenance

Stream Cable TV employs approximately 20 technicians to handle installation, service requests and other network maintenance duties. Stream Cable TV commits to clear all service and maintenance requests and service interruptions within 48 hours, and most are resolved in a shorter time. Where service or maintenance work requires digging, Stream Cable TV uses outside contractors to perform that work.

Billing and Credit Control

Subscribers are billed one month in advance. It is Stream Cable's TV policy to disconnect subscribers whose bills are more than 60 days overdue. Customers seeking to be reconnected must pay their past-due amounts plus a reconnection fee.

Stream Cable TV's Technology

Its networks are, in general, modern two-way HFC cable networks.

Stream Cable TV owns approximately 80% of its networks and leases the remaining 20% from Gimsat. See the above discussion of the Gimsat acquisition at Item 4-History of Stream Cable TV. Because its networks are scalable, Stream Cable TV can add bandwidth as necessary by adding or replacing amplifiers.

The potential capacity of Stream Cable TV's networks is 68 radio channels at the bandwidth of 0,3 MHz and 94 television channels at the (European) bandwidth of 8,0 MHz. The capacity of its networks is smaller because some frequencies are used by state authorities, mobile telephony operators and terrestrial radio and television operators.

Currently, 75% of Stream's networks are engineered for a broad 862 MHz bandwidth and 17% of the networks operates at the 606 MHz bandwidth. The narrowest bandwidth of any portion of Stream's network is 550 MHz, which accounts for only about 8%. Stream Cable TV estimates that by the end of 2002 all its networks will be engineered for the broad bandwidth.

In the process of the unification of the channel offerings, all channels are put on the bandwidth of up to 720 MHz as in the future the higher band will be used for a digital signal transmission.

All of Stream Cable TV's equipment is obtained from multiple suppliers, both Polish and foreign. As it increases the size of its networks, Stream Cable TV expects that it may be able to negotiate better prices for its future equipment purchases.

As a result of Stream Cable TV having acquired multiple networks, its current overall system includes more cable head-ends than it needs. Stream Cable TV is carrying out works to eliminate about 50% of the existing head-ends.

Data transmission over HFC networks is much faster and more reliable than over telephone lines. Stream Cable TV has been converting its networks to make high-speed Internet access available to individual and business customers. The conversion involves, essentially, the upgrading of certain network amplifiers.

Services and Fees

Stream Cable TV offers its customers cable television services and is beginning to offer high-speed Internet access in certain areas as well. Stream Cable TV desires to unify the channel offerings and pricing structures of all of its networks. While it has not yet achieved this unity across all of the networks that it has acquired, almost all of its networks offer (with regional variation) the following three program packages:

- Broadcast Tier: encompasses 8 channels, including all four Polish national channels and Stream's own information channel;

- Intermediate Tier: encompasses 18 channels, including all the above Broadcast Tier programs and five Polish terrestrial programs, four German programs and three French programs; and

- Basic Tier: encompasses 45 channels, including all Intermediate Tier programs, Polish-language programs, German music programs, English-language information programs, other foreign language programs and certain pay channels.

The purpose of this tiered offering is to maximise penetration and also to encourage subscribers to move, over time, to higher priced tiers. In the future Stream Cable TV intends to offer premium packages of additional channels, including, for example, Canal+ or HBO.

At present, cable television fees in Poland are not regulated. Stream Cable TV is free to charge its customers fees that are acceptable to the market.

Because the regulatory authorities in Poland do not currently set or oversee retail prices for either cable television subscriptions or Internet access, Stream Cable TV is free to charge its customers the rates that its markets will bear. Because Stream Cable TV has acquired a number of networks with differing product offerings and pricing structures, it has been regularly raising its rates over the last year and has not experienced significant churn as a result. This increase in rates comes at the same time that Stream Cable TV is able to begin to control and reduce costs by operating its many networks on a centralised basis.

Across Stream Cable TV's networks its current subscription prices at each tier are low compared to those of larger Polish cable television providers. Stream Cable TV expects to continue to increase its subscription prices across its networks until they are both uniform and in line with the broader Polish market given the quality of Stream Cable TV's programming.

Stream Cable TV broadcasts certain channels for which it pays no fee other than royalties under Polish copyright law. These channels are available either terrestrially or by satellite. Polish cable operators have access to more than 200 television channels from many satellites, the most popular of which are Eutelsat and Astra. Satellite digital free-to-air programs require only digital receivers at headends, which Stream Cable TV already has in place.

Stream Cable TV broadcasts all "must-carry" channels. Stream Cable TV also purchases some of its programming from a number of established international sources, as well as some newer suppliers. Stream Cable TV receives three of its more popular channels from Canal+, three from Turner and five from Discovery. All of these suppliers supply their programming under three to five-year contracts. Stream Cable TV purchases additional paid-for channels, including, for example, one from National Geographic.

As it grows its subscriber base, Stream Cable TV expects that it may be able to negotiate better prices for its paid-for programming.

Regulatory Environment

Radio and Television Act

The Radio and Television Act regulates the broadcasting of radio and television programmes and of cable channels. The Radio and Television Act established the National Radio and Television Council ("KRRiT"). KRRiT is responsible to support the freedom of speech in radio and television, to support the independence of broadcasting organisations, to protect viewers' interests and to ensure the open and pluralistic nature of radio and television. KRRiT also seeks to prevent steps aimed at the establishment of a monopoly in radio and television, to eliminate censorship and to ensure, through its licensing policy, the pluralistic nature of the audio-visual mass media. KRRiT also functions as the oversight authority over all activities of broadcasting organisations.

The Radio and Television Act ensures the independence of broadcasting organisations as they transmit information, entertainment, cultural and artistic events, and other ideas by imposing on broadcasters norms and conditions for their programming structures and by allocating broadcasting time to specific programme items. Such norms also apply to advertising, teleshopping and sponsoring. In order to enforce such restrictions, KRRiT is entitled to verify the contents and reception of all radio and television programmes broadcast in Poland.

Cable operators who broadcast entire channels of a domestic or foreign broadcasting organisation must register such channels with KRRiT. This registration requirement applies to all channels, except for nation-wide public radio and television and other programmes of domestic broadcasting organisations which can be received within such cable operator's area with common aerial reception equipment. Cable operators should apply for registration of a channel no later than within two months prior to the start of broadcast. The cable operator may start to broadcast two months after the filing of the application for registration unless KRRiT has denied the registration within that time. After the registration of a channel, the cable operator is obliged to notify the KRRiT within 14 days if the contents of the channel has materially changed. Stream Cable TV's channels have been either registered or their registration is pending; normally the registration is valid for three years.

KRRiT may refuse the registration of a channel if a cable operator does not have a valid broadcasting license or otherwise is not in material compliance with applicable laws. KRRiT may also refuse the registration of a channel if the contents of the channel itself is in violation of applicable law, among other reasons.

KRRiT may prohibit the broadcasting of a channel if such broadcasting would violate any provisions of the Radio and Television Act or if the cable operator fails to broadcast the channels in the prescribed order, introduces changes to a channel, or fails to broadcast the channel in full, among other reasons.

At present, Poland's legislature is in the process of reviewing the Radio and Television Act to decide whether it conforms with European Union standards. At present, the legislature is contemplating modifications to the regulations applicable to cable network operators, specifically in the areas of channel broadcasting, the statutory channel sequence, the contents of applications for channel registrations, and the criteria allowing KRRiT to deny registration applications for channel broadcasts, among other provisions.

Copyrights Act

Copyrighted works, such as the type broadcast by cable operators, are protected by the Copyrights Act.

Under the Copyrights Act, radio and television organisations, including cable operations, may broadcast published works only pursuant to an agreement with an organisation responsible for the collective management of copyrights or pursuant to an agreement with the author of such work. This requirement applies to both small verbal and verbal-musical works and to all broadcast works.

To facilitate this effort, the Copyrights Act provides for a statutory licence for cable operators. However, the statutory license applies only if the cable operator broadcasts a work simultaneously and integrally with the original broadcast. Persons who hold rights to such works are eligible for remuneration; royalties typically are paid to organisations of collective management of copyrights, such as ZAIKS, one such organisation.

Telecommunications Act

All telecommunications activities are regulated by the Telecommunications Act which took effect on 1 January 2001, replacing the Communications Act of 23 November 1990.

The Telecommunications Act provides regulations on telecommunications activities and technical requirements for equipment to be used for telecommunications activities. A "telecommunications activity" means the providing or making available any type of telecommunications service and the use of telecommunications networks. Moreover, the Telecommunications Act contains detailed provisions concerning telecommunications permits, radio permits, frequency usage, telecommunications secrecy, connection of networks, co-operation of operators, telecommunications infrastructure and the functioning and organisation of the Telecommunications and Post Regulation Office (prior to April 1, 2002, the Telecommunications Regulation Office) ("URTiP"), among other provisions.

Under the Telecommunications Act, a permit is required to use the public telephone network and any public network intended to broadcast retransmit radio and television programmes. Following the request of the operator, URTIP grants such permits for ten to twenty-five year periods. A permit entitles its holder to provide telecommunications services through its own network within all of Poland, subject only to the cable operator's technical capabilities. The Telecommunications Act does not contain any detailed prohibitions, and a permit does not restrict the area of telecommunications activity or the kind of services a cable operator may provide. Stream Cable TV has obtained a number of such permits, each valid until either 2011 or 2012.

URTiP may refuse to issue a permit only under certain circumstances defined in the Telecommunications Act or if there exist justified circumstances posing a threat to national defence or to the operation of telecommunication networks. When the applicant fulfils all conditions for acquiring the permit, URTiP must not refuse it.

Once obtained, the permit may be withdrawn if a court prohibits the operator from carrying on the economic activity covered by the permit, if the operator fails to meet the conditions which were the basis for granting the permit, or if the operator fails to remedy, within a specific time after notice thereof, any non-compliance with the regulations governing the permit. Furthermore, URTiP may withdraw the permit if the operator violates provisions of the Telecommunications Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder or violates the terms and conditions of the permit. URTiP also may withdraw the permit if a decision is made to wind-up operator, bankruptcy of the operator is declared or the operator fails to make the payments provided for in the Telecommunications Act. URTiP may make such a decision at its discretion but is not obliged to withdraw the permit even if one of these factors is true.

The Telecommunications Act does not require a permit under some circumstances. The Minster responsible for telecommunications may define, by ordinance, activities that do not require a permit. In such cases, operators are obliged to notify URTiP of the proposed activity in writing at least 28 days before the planned date of commencement of such activity. Following the notification, URTiP issues a certificate of notification. Stream Cable TV holds such a certificate related to its internet access services in the Krakow area.

Competition and consumer protection

Two principal laws that are relevant to Stream Cable TV apply with respect to competition and consumer protection regulations. Those are the Act on Protection of Competition ("Competition Act") and the Telecommunications Act discussed above.

(a) Competition Act

The Competition Act regulates market competition and consumers' rights. Specifically, the Competition Act regulates conditions on the development of competition, rules and methods of counteracting monopolistic practices and businesses' violation of consumer interest. The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection ("UOKiK") administers the Competition Act. Detailed provisions applicable to entitles operating in the telecommunications industry, especially provisions on dominant or significant market positions, are also contained in the Telecommunications Law.

The threshold question of whether the Competition Act applies turns on whether the entity in question holds a dominant market position. A dominant market position typically exists if the entity is able to prevent efficient competition in a given market by being able to operate to a large extent independently of its competitors, business partners and consumers. The Competition Act assumes that an entity holds a dominant position when its market share exceeds 40%. The Competition Act prohibits any activities that are designed to restrict competition through acquiring or strengthening a dominant position in the relevant market. Therefore, the Competition Act prohibits specific activities aimed at the elimination or the restriction of competition; a list of such activities is contained in the Competition Act.

Activities related to the concentration of entities are also subject to regulation. The Competition Act imposes an obligation to notify UOKiK of specific transactions, including mergers, share exchanges, acquisitions, and other transactions having a consolidating effect. UOKiK may prohibit such business combinations if, following such a transaction, the entities involved would acquire or strengthen a dominant position in the affected market that would substantially restrict competition. UOKiK approval may occur on a conditional basis.

The above notification requirement applies to all entities whose total sales in the financial year preceding the year of notification exceed an equivalent of EUR 50 million. However, the notification requirement does not apply if the entity that is being acquired had sales of EUR 10 million or less in the two fiscal years preceding the notification. In addition, no notification is required if the combined market share of both entities does not exceed 20%. Transactions among foreign entities that have an impact on the Polish market may also require notification. We will not meet these threshold requirements in the foreseeable future.

If an entity fails to notify the UOKiK or takes other steps that violate the Competition Act, UOKiK may levy fines against all parties participating in the combination as well as on the members of their governing bodies personally.

(b)	Competition and the Telecommunications Act

The Telecommunications Act contains several provisions applicable to entities that hold a dominant or significant market position. Whether a public operator holds a dominant position in a given market is determined under the provisions of the Competition Act. In order to establish whether a cable operator holds a significant market position in a given market, a cable operator must have a market share of at least 25%. On the basis of certain criteria it is also possible to establish that a cable operator, whose market share is less than 25%, holds a significant market position. URTiP, acting jointly with UOKiK, must make the decision of whether the cable operator in a given area holds a dominant or significant market position.

The Telecommunications Law imposes several obligations on cable operators that hold dominant or significant market positions. Such obligations may include URTiP review of draft common services agreements and amendments thereto draft by-laws for the provision of common services or amendments to such by-laws, or may include observance of a certain procedure to set prices for common services, or the providing of services in accordance with certain rules , among other obligations. In connection with such obligations, URTiP may use several means of enforcing appropriate activities of operators holding a significant market position.

The list of operators that hold significant and dominant position is published by URTiP once a year.

Special obligations in exceptional situations

Under the Telecommunications Law Act, operators are required to take into consideration, while planning, constructing, developing, using or merging telecommunications networks, the possibility of force majuere events, such as the imposition of martial or emergency laws or natural calamities. Special obligations in such situations include, among other obligations, the co-operation of operators, securing networks and telecommunications equipment, maintaining continuity of operation and ensuring access of emergency services and governmental administration to telecommunications equipment.

Some special limitations are also imposed by the Act on Common Duty to Defend the Republic of Poland. In the event of operational reviews conducted by the armed forces, military drills, training in civil defence or common self-defence in peace time, as well as in the event of announcement of army mobilisation or at time of war, all businesses may be obliged to provide material services to the Armed Forces, for instance leasing real and other property to the armed forces.

Steam Cable TV's Organization, Management and Personnel

As a Polish limited liability company, Stream Cable TV has two levels of management:

Management Board; and

Supervisory Board.

The Management Board has the responsibility of making all executive management decisions, while the Supervisory Board has the responsibility of periodically monitoring and approving the activities of the Management Board.

The Supervisory Board directors of Stream Cable TV are elected by the shareholders (Parent Company) at each annual general meeting of Stream Cable TV, or, in the event of a vacancy, they are appointed by the Supervisory Board of Directors then in office, to serve until the next annual general meeting of Stream Cable TV or until their successors are elected and ratified.

Management Board:

Stream Cable TV's Management Board currently comprises:



Dobroslaw Ploskonka		- Vice President; and

Zbigniew Tragarz		- Vice President.

Supervisory Board:

Stream Cable TV's Supervisory Board currently comprises of the following members:



Stanislaw Lis

Andrzej Szweryn

Stream Cable TV Locations

Stream Cable TV currently rents 5,000 square feet in an office building, close to the center of Kraków and is considered adequate for the company's head office needs for the foreseeable future. The customer database and the call center (to manage customer calls) are also located here.

Stream Cable TV also maintains small separate offices in Rzeszów, Bielsko-Biala, Jaslo, Sanok and Czestochowa to act as a base for local customer service and sales representatives. These local offices will be connected with the head-office in Kraków and will be able to access its database on-line.

Competition to Stream Cable TV

The following large Polish cable television operators, who control in the aggregate approximately 50% of the existing Polish cable television market, have a limited presence in the markets that Stream Cable TV has targeted:

- UPC Telewizja Kablowa S.A., a subsidiary of the European cable operator United Pan-Europe Communications, or UPC. UPC's cable subscribers are located in regional clusters encompassing eight of the ten largest cities in Poland.

- Vectra,

- Elektrim S.A.

- Multimedia Polska S.A., which has approximately 360,000 subscribers in Poland, principally in Kalisz, Szczecin, Gorzow Wielkopolski, Lublin, Rzeszow, Gdynia, Torun and Plock.

Currently, less than 10% of Stream Cable TV's aggregate networks are overbuilt by any of these competitors. Therefore, even where they are operating in the same municipal markets as Stream Cable TV these competitors are typically not wiring the same subscribers.

Direct-to-home satellite television ("DTH"), which is widely available in Poland, is a television delivery system that competes with cable. There are currently two providers of high-quality DTH in Poland:

- New Cyfra+, with about 620,000 subscribers (monthly fees in the range US$12.90 to US$27.60); and

- Polsat Cyfrowy, with about 280,000 subscribers (approximate monthly fee US$ 7.00).

Eight terrestrial channels are potentially available in Poland. These represent another source of competition for cable television. Nevertheless, terrestrial signal reception in all but the largest cities is so poor that most people are able to receive only a few of these channels. Stream Cable TV believes that the extensive national marketing conducted by these channels actually helps Stream Cable TV and other cable companies to win subscribers, because most Poles need some form of cable television in order to receive these channels clearly.

In addition to competition for subscribers, Stream Cable TV also faces competition for acquisitions. Currently, both Multimedia Polska and Vectra are seeking to grow though acquisition, including in southern Poland. Stream Cable TV believes that its financial condition and the reputation that Stream Cable TV and its management have developed in the industry for fair dealing in past transactions assist it in competing for acquisition targets.

Office

Stream Cable TV utilizes about 5,000 square feet of office space in Krakow, Poland, an increase from 1,000 square feet previously held. Stream Cable TV's rent is currently 46,532 zloty ($11,023 USD, $17,512 CDN) per month.

International Eco-Waste Systems S.A.

Overview of Eco-Waste

Eco-Waste was in the business of constructing and operating rendering plants in Poland. Eco-Waste does not currently have any rendering plants in operation; however, it was planned to construct three animal-waste rendering plants in Zabokliki, Torun and Rawa Mazowiecka, Poland. With the Company's main business now focused on cable TV, a decision was made to sell off the business of Eco-Waste, considered not compatible with its business objectives. In April 2002 we signed agreements to sell Eco-Waste for an amount of $1.5 million USD ($2.35 million CDN, 5.93 million zloty) to an arm's length buyer.

History

On March 9, 2000, Eco-Waste entered into an agreement with the Danish company K.E.A. Andersen Montage A-S ("Andersen"), pursuant to which Andersen agreed to supply all equipment for the construction of the rendering plant in Zabokliki, Poland. Andersen was also responsible for the assembly and testing of the rendering plant. When the BSE scare hit Europe and subsequently Poland, it was decided to turn the meat rendering facility into a meat incineration facility. Andersen agreed to supply different equipment to meet the needs of incineration instead of the original contract.

Government officials in Poland to keep Poland free of so-called "mad cow" disease had implemented a total ban on the import of meat and bone meal (MBM) effective on February 6, 2001. The ban was implemented to prevent MBM used in the production of farm animal feed in the European Union from being re-exported to Poland via third countries. Poland already prohibits the import of beef and MBM from 11 EU countries where the disease, scientifically known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), has been discovered. As the BSE crisis in the EU deepens, Poland has moved to further clampdown on imports of products that heighten the risk of Polish herds becoming infected with the disease.

Animal feed made with MBM is widely considered by experts as the most likely cause of BSE in cattle. BSE has been linked to the human form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, which has led to the deaths of about 90 people in Britain, two in France and one in Ireland. Poland banned the use of MBM in feed for cattle two years ago. But the ban has not yet been extended to other farm animals, such as pigs and poultry, which are not considered at risk of contracting BSE.

On January 25, 2001, Prime Minister Jerzy Buzek announced a bipartite action plan worked out by an inter-ministerial government team formed last year following the spread of the disease to countries previously considered BSE-free. Under plan A, which will remain in effect as long as Poland remains BSE-free, veterinary inspectors will randomly test about 15,000 cattle sent to slaughter. In addition, since BSE is a neurological illness, all animals diagnosed with related disorders will be tested for the presence of the illness. Government officials estimate that the total number tested annually under this program will reach 18,000 and cost 10 million zloty ($2.43 million USD, $3.7 million CDN).

Plan B is a so-called "worst case scenario," drawn up in the event that BSE is discovered in Polish herds. Once put into motion, all cattle sent to slaughter will be tested for the presence of BSE that could cost as much as 100 million zloty ($24.3 million USD, $36.7 million CDN). The blueprint for Plan B calls for adding four more laboratories in Poland equipped to test for BSE. At present, Poland has only one lab in Pulawy.

In view of developments and uncertainty with BSE issues we took advantage of existing licenses and applied for and received an incinerator waste licence. Eco-Waste's incinerator license was formally receipted in February 2002, enabling Eco-Waste to operate a meat incineration facility in Zabokliki. As a result of our focus on cable TV and the operations of Stream Cable TV, we decided that the operations of Eco-Waste did not fit with our current objectives.

Management and Employees

Management Structure:

As a Polish limited liability company, Eco-Waste has two levels of management:

Management Board; and

Supervisory Board.

The Management Board has the responsibility of making all executive management decisions, while the Supervisory Board has the responsibility of periodically monitoring and approving the activities of the Management Board.

The Supervisory Board directors of Eco-waste are elected by the shareholders (Parent Company) at each annual general meeting of Eco-Waste, or, in the event of a vacancy, they are appointed by the Supervisory Board of Directors then in office, to serve until the next annual general meeting of Eco-Waste or until their successors are elected and ratified.

Management Board:

Eco-Waste's Management Board currently comprises:



Waldemar Dziak, PhD		- Vice President

Supervisory Board:

Eco-Waste's Supervisory Board currently comprises of the following members:



Grzegorz Namyslowski

Stanislaw Lis

Iwona Kozak

Zbigniew Tragarz - President:

Mr. Tragarz, a businessman, is a director of Castle Holding Limited (a Polish financial advisory services and trading company). Mr. Tragarz also acts as an advisor in Poland to INVESCO CEAM (a UK fund manager specializing in investments within Central and Eastern Europe).

Waldemar Dziak - Vice President:

Mr. Dziak has worked for 10 years in the Polish waste industry, including as the President of the Polish subsidiary of Lobbe GmbH (a leader in communal waste disposal in Germany).

Dariusz Sutarzewicz - Technical:

Mr. Sutarzewicz is a specialist sanitary engineer who has worked for 15 years in the Polish animal-waste processing industry. He has worked notably within the Polish Institute of Meat and Fat Research and is a recognized expert in animal by-product rendering.

Environmental Regulations

Currently, we hold a valid hazardous waste license to incinerate waste meat products.

Office

Eco-Waste utilizes about 2,500 square feet of office space in Warsaw, Poland. Eco-Waste's rent is $4,033 CDN per month. In addition, Eco-Waste pays $1,155 CDN per month for office support that includes secretarial services, faxes, photocopier, computers, printers and utilities.

Real Estate

Eco-Waste owns two pieces of real estate in Poland:

On May 9, 1997 Eco-Waste purchased 1,950 square meters (20,989.8 square feet) of land, which is located 18 kilometres away from downtown Warsaw. Eco-Waste paid 242,000 zloty ($69,000 USD, $99,600 CDN) for this land. This land is not currently being used and the intended purpose of this land has not been determined at this time.

On May 1, 1998 Eco-Waste purchased 3.3 ha of serviced land in Zabokliki, near Siedlce, Poland for 87,284 zloty ($26,000 USD, 41,000 CDN). This land is being used for the site of the first rendering plant. To December 31, 2000 we have spent $2,036,726 CDN on the construction of the plant.

PolVoice.com Sp. z o.o.

Telephony and Internet Provider in Poland

Since October of 1999, PolVoice has been working on the development of software to offer Internet services in Poland. In November of 1999, PolVoice applied to the Ministry for Telecommunication in Poland for a license that is essential for PolVoice to operate in that sector in Poland. PolVoice received its telecommunications license as of August 22, 2000.

PolVoice's business objective was to become an Internet, data transmission and VOIP provider in Poland. PolVoice services did include VOIP services, data transmission, teleconferencing, web site development and maintenance.

In view of our main business and objectives directed towards cable TV, it was decided to discontinue the operations of PolVoice. In this manner, we are focused on one business objective. Subsequent to December 31, 2001, the operations of PolVoice were discontinued. The PolVoice entity will be liquidated.

History

We and Messrs. Tadeusz Piwowar and Rafal Skrzeczkowski formed PolVoice on September 23, 1999. We paid 220,000 zloty ($76,956 CDN, $51,997 USD) for a 68.8% stake in PolVoice. During 2001, we converted loans of 1,888,500 zloty made by the parent into additional shares of PolVoice to increase our ownership to 95.5%.

We did not incur costs related to the development or purchase of internal use software. With our technical expertise we modified existing systems, hardware and software and assisted customers in interfacing with their equipment to other systems or equipment.

The only sources of revenue have been from Internet servicing and web site development.

EES Waste Solutions Ltd.

EES Waste Solutions Ltd. is currently an inactive entity. In April 2002, we signed agreements to sell it along with Eco-Waste, as described further in our discussion of Eco-Waste, above.

General and Economic Conditions in the Republic of Poland

Substantially all our business operations are conducted in the country of Poland. Poland aspires to join the EU, and therefore needs to harmonize its legislature and trading practices with those of the EU. There have been many reforms since 1989 in banking, taxation and commercial practices. As a result, in 1991 Poland signed an EU Association Agreement that initialised the free-trade system with EU member countries; in 1996 Poland became the 28th OECD member; by 1997 Poland was invited to join NATO, invited to begin negotiating EU membership. The tax system in Poland was modified and a new personal income tax was introduced in 1992. Aside from direct taxes such as personal income tax and corporate tax, there are indirect taxes: value added tax (VAT), various custom duties or employee security tax (ZUS). It is expected that Poland will join the EU within two years and adopt the Euro within four years.

There have been frequent changes in legislation concerning taxes and business practices as a result of adaptation to the needs of market economy. Generally, in Polish law the legal form takes precedence over the substance. Administrative rulings tend to follow the wording of the law and no attempt may be made to understand the underlying economic realities of transactions or the intentions of the legislation.

Standard & Poor's have given a "BBB+" rating to the country of Poland. A "BBB" rating indicates an adequate capacity to meet financial commitments.

The following table gives various key statistics on the country of Poland as compared to other European countries. Ranking is done on the basis of international reserves plus gold reserves less national debt per capita.

|Financial Statistics of Selected European Countries - 2001
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|Eastern Europe                                            
|Poland                                                    
|Russian Federation                                        
|Slovakia                                                  
|Romania                                                   
|Czech Republic                                            
|Bulgaria                                                  
|Hungary                                                   
|Ukraine                                                   
|Belarus                                                   
|Republic of Moldova                                       
|Western Europe                                            
|Netherlands                                               
|France                                                    
|Austria                                                   
|Belgium                                                   
|Germany                                                   
|United Kingdom                                            
|Italy                                                     



Item 5 - Operating and Financing Review and Prospects

Overview

We prepare our financial statements in Canadian dollars and in accordance with Canadian GAAP reconciled to US GAAP.

Our core business is considered to be our cable TV operations. At December 31, 2001 some $7 million CDN had been spent on the acquisition of cable television network equipment and $2.4 million CDN on the acquisition of licenses and subscribers. During the year ended October 31, 2001, we expended $2,725,120 CDN on cable TV acquisition as compared to total previous acquisitions of $4,031,346 CDN. Our future business growth is expected to consist of buying subscribers from independent operators, building networks in areas where existing operators are unwilling to sell us their subscribers, buying interests in existing cable operations and reconstructing old systems by preparing them for the transmission of new services, including pay-per-view, internet, and video-on-demand.

Our other endeavours involve PolVoice, that since October 1999 had been working on the development of software and hardware to offer internet services in Poland. The operations of PolVoice have been discontinued subsequent to December 31, 2001.

The operations of Eco-Waste are shown as discontinued operations pursuant to our decision to focus on our core cable TV operation. Eco-Waste had planned on building rendering and meat handling facilities. On December 4, 2000 the European Union's representatives announced that new regulations for rendering plants and meat handling changed as a result of beef contamination from bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). We applied and received a hazardous waste licence to operate an incinerator plant, thus providing a continuity of business into meat waste incineration. In April 2002 we signed agreements to sell Eco-Waste for an amount of $1.5 million USD ($2.35 million CDN, 5.93 million zloty) to an arm's length buyer. It is anticipated that these agreements will close by the end of August 2002.

Results of Operations

Two Months ended December 31, 2001 Compared to the Year ended October 31, 2001

Revenue from operations was an average of $319,936 CDN per month as compared to the year ended October 31, 2001 that averaged $173,292 CDN per month showing an increase of 85%. This increase was expected, in that the number of subscribers has increased month by month. It is expected and planned that the number of subscribers and the average monthly rate will continue to increase. The increase in subscribers can result from increase in market penetration from marketing efforts and from acquisitions of assets and/or existing networks. Rates can increase from new services being offered. At this time it is impossible to speculate on the size of increases in revenue.

The loss from continuing operations before future income taxes and non-controlling interest averaged $402,650 CDN per month as compared to $260,304 CDN per month for the year ended October 31, 2001, for an average increase of 55%. The percentage increase of 85% for sales and 46% for operating expenses shows a slight improvement in profitability. Within the category of general and administrative, we experienced increases of 104% in accounting and auditing, being $95,284 for the two months ended December as compared to $280,539 for the year ended in October. Similarly, rent increased 128%, being $152,952 for the two months ended December and $402,916 for the year ended in October. Other comparisons are difficult to make as a two-month period is a very short time to measure against any trends. This is especially true as the year ended October 31, 2001 continually changed from acquisitions.

In July 2001, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants approved the new handbook section 1581, "Business Combinations", replacing section 1580, that will require all business combinations to use the purchase method of accounting. It has also approved a new section 3062, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", that will require intangible assets with an indefinite life and goodwill to be tested for impairment on an annual basis. Goodwill and indefinite life intangibles will no longer be amortized. Intangible assets with a definite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The new sections are consistent with those recently approved by the FASB (SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No.142). The company determined that the cable TV licences have indefinite life. The company evaluated its existing intangible assets and goodwill and concluded that no provisions for impairment were required, except for goodwill from the acquisition of PolVoice, now part of discontinued operations (note 4). Subscriber base is amortized using the straight-line method at rate of 5%.

Generally there was a slight improvement in profitability, however, a period of two months is insufficient to give a good measurement.

Differences Between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Effects of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP and reconciled to US GAAP. Differences are shown in note 13.

Expenditures incurred during the start-up of a new facility prior to commencement of commercial operations may be capitalized under Canadian GAAP. Under US GAAP, these costs are expensed. For the year ended October 31, 1999, $1,443,550 CDN in start-up costs relating to Eco-Waste were capitalized under Canadian GAAP. These costs have been written off in total at October 31, 2001.

Recently the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants issued standards #3465 - Income Taxes, which requires the adoption of the liability rather than the deferral method of accounting for income taxes wherein accumulated tax balances are adjusted to reflect changes in tax rates. The new Canadian standard is consistent with the US rules.

Comprehensive income - US GAAP requires disclosure of comprehensive income which comprises income and other comprehensive income. Comprehensive loss for the company consists of net loss and other comprehensive income, being foreign exchange adjustment of $207,499 CDN (October 31, 2001: $655,703 CDN).

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations in June 2001. FAS No. 143 requires that asset retirement obligations be recognized as a liability, measured at fair value. The associated retirement costs are capitalized and amortized over the asset's useful life. FAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We are currently considering the impact of FAS No. 143.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. FAS No. 144 requires that an impairment loss should be recognized if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value for assets in use. The standard also changes the criteria for classification of operating results as discontinued operations. FAS No. 144 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 14, 2001. We are currently considering the impact of FAS No. 144.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Subsequent Events

For the two months ended December 31, 2001, we raised an additional $1,557,095 CDN from private placement of equity in the company's stock. During the year ended October 31, 2001, we raised $347,300 CDN from the exercise of stock options and $6,983,523 CDN from private placements. The following schedule gives a breakdown of our private placements at October 31, 2001 and December 31, 2001.

|                  | Number of Units | Price ($CDN) | Amount ($CDN) | Cash Commission ($CDN) | Net ($CDN)
|----------------- | --------------- | ------------ | ------------- | ---------------------- | ----------
|Private placement | 901,286         | 1.75         | 1,577,251     | 75,273                 | 1,501,978 
|Private placement | 300,000         | 1.60         | 480,000       | -                      | 480,000   
|Private placement | 2,259,295       | 1.60         | 3,614,872     | 8,000                  | 3,606,872 
|Private placement | 819,625         | 1.60         | 1,311,400     | -                      | 1,311,400 
|October 31, 2001  | 4,280,206       |              | 6,983,523     | 83,273                 | 6,900,250 
|Private placement | 1,240,705       | 1.60         | 1,985,128     | 35,770                 | 1,949,358 
|Private placement | 121,250         | 1.60         | 194,000       | -                      | 194,000   
|Private placement | 125,000         | 3.15         | 393,800       | 11,820                 | 381,980   
|December 31, 2001 | 5,767,161       |              | 9,556,451     | 130,863                | 9,425,588 

Subsequent to December 31, 2001, on March 11, 2002, we received $500,000 USD from the exercise of warrants.

Liquidity of our assets has improved since the previous period with an increase in cash flow, but our working capital is still insufficient. With continued equity investment from private placements we expect to acquire cash flow assets to further increase our cash flow. Our plans are to raise additional equity money and regularize cash flow before raising funds from debt issues. In addition the sale of Eco-Waste will contribute $1.5 million USD.

Our working capital at December 31, 2001 was a negative $1,380,251 CDN down from the previous period by $809,143 CDN. An additional $2,574,780 CDN was raised through the exercise of stock options and private placement of equity, where $1,191,940 CDN was invested into deposits on cable TV acquisitions, and plant and equipment. The balance was used in operations.

PolVoice has had marginal revenues of $10,347 CDN for the two months ended December 31, 2001 as compared to $14,614 CDN for the year ended October 31, 2001. The decision to discontinue the operations of PolVoice through Stream Cable TV was based on two items. The first item is our commitment to focus on our cable TV operations and the second is to reduce expense.

In April 2002, we signed agreements to sell our Eco-waste entities, as described further in our discussion of Eco-Waste earlier in this document.

Our senior management establishes our overall funding and capital policies, monitors the availability of sources of financing and reviews the foreign exchange risk. We will continue to raise funds by way of private placements in our capital stock, exercise of stock options and warrants, sale of equity in our subsidiaries, and mortgages and loans, although there can be no guarantee that such funds will be available in the future. We have received the majority of funding by way of private placement of our common shares.

ITEM 6 -Directors, Senior Management and Employees

Our board of directors is elected by our shareholders as indicated in our memorandum of association. Directors have not entered into any service agreements and do not receive any remuneration. Our executive officers are appointed by our board of directors and have service agreements with us. The normal notice period for executive officers is 12 months. In the case of Stream Cable TV, Eco-Waste and PolVoice, the Supervisory Board is elected by its shareholders (Parent Company) and the Supervisory Board appoints the management. The following sets out our directors and officers.

Directors and Senior Management

|                                     |  |                                                       
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|The Company                         
|Stanislaw L. Lis - 51 yrs            |  | President, CEO, Director                              
|Edward Mazur - 56 yrs                |  | Chairman of the Company, Chairman of Supervisory Board
|Iwona Kozak - 40 yrs                 |  | Corporate Secretary, Director                         
|Casey Forward, CGA - 48 yrs          |  | Chief Financial Officer                               
|Grzegorz Namyslowski - 56 yrs        |  | Vice President of Business Development, Director      
|Chuck Correll - 47 yrs               |  | Vice President of Strategic and Corporate Development 
|Glen Little - 48 yrs                 |  | Director                                              
|Stream Communications Sp. z o.o.    
|Adam Wójcik - 48 yrs                 |  | President and CEO                                     
|Dobroslaw Ploskonka	-34 yrs          |  | Vice-President                                        
|Zbigniew Tragarz - 50 yrs            |  | Vice-President                                        
|Andrzej Szweryn - 57 yrs             |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Stanislaw L. Lis                     |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Grzegorz Namyslowski                 |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|                                     |  |                                                       
|International Eco-Waste Systems S.A.
|Zbigniew Tragarz                     |  | President                                             
|Waldemar Dziak, PhD - 43 yrs         |  | Vice President                                        
|Edward Mazur                         |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Stanislaw L. Lis                     |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Grzegorz Namyslowski                 |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Iwona Kozak                          |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|PolVoice. Com Sp. z o.o.            
|Zbigniew Tragarz                     |  | President                                             
|Rafal Skrzeczkowski - 26 yrs         |  | Vice President                                        
|Michal Piwowar - 22 yrs              |  | Vice President                                        
|Edward Mazur                         |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Stanislaw L. Lis                     |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Grzegorz Namyslowski                 |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Tadeusz Piwowar                      |  | Supervisory Board                                     
|Izabela Palotynska - 33 yrs          |  | Supervisory Board                                     

Edward A. Mazur

Stanislaw Lis is 51 years old. He has been a Director and President of the Company since 25 February 1994. He is a Canadian national. Since 23 April 1999 he has also been performing the function of Chief Executive Officer. He commenced his education in Poland. In 1976 he had emigrated to Canada where he continued his studies at the management and administration department at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver. At the beginning of the 1980's he worked in the finance economy department of the company Allcorp in Vancouver controlling a number of public companies. In 1988 he founded International UNP Holdings, an investment company engaged in the business of buying and financing Polish State-owned companies. In the years 1989-1992 he was the president of that company. In 1992 he created a joint venture company with the participation of the American company Emergency One and WSK Mielec whose business activities included the production and sale of fire trucks. In the years 1992-1994 he was the vice-president of that company.

Iwona Kozak is 40 years old. She is a national of Canada. Since 1 March 1996 she has been a Director and Vice President for Corporate Affairs and since 23 April 1999 she has been its Secretary. Born in Poland, she has been living in British Columbia since 1984. She graduated from the British Columbia Institute of Technology with a diploma in marketing. She has a broad experience in the area of marketing and public relations. She perfected her managerial and business skills as the co-founder and president of a division of the Canadian Polish Chamber of Commerce in British Columbia. In the years 1993-1995 she published a magazine dedicated to economics called "Partners with Poland" ("Partnerstwo z Polska") and provided advisory services to Canadian companies in the area of investments in Polish markets.

Glenn Little is 48 years old. He is a Canadian national. Since 24 August 1993 he has been a Director responsible for contacts with investors and shareholders as well as for all issues falling within the competence of the secretariat and administration of our head office in Vancouver. He graduated from Pacific Marine Institute. In the years 1972-1980 he was the owner of a firm operating in the fishing industry and in the years 1980- 1993 he was the owner of Jackson Little Holdings Ltd., a company engaged in the business of automotive transportation services in British Columbia. His competencies also included the establishment and maintenance of contacts with the growing number of our shareholders in North America.

Grzegorz Namyslowski is 56 years old. He is a Polish national. He is one of our Directors since 10 March 2001 he has been serving as its Senior Vice President for Business Development. He graduated from the Warsaw Polytechnic with an M.Sc. in engineering. He held the position of the chief designer responsible for the design and construction of major power plants in Poland in the 1970s. He was a senior manager at Solco Basel, a Swiss pharmaceutical firm in Warsaw. Since 1991 he has been an active co-worker at INVESCO. In the years 1992-1999 he was the chairman of the supervisory board of the company ZP Zywiec S.A. and in the years 1993-2001 a member of the supervisory board of Zywiec Trade Sp. z o.o. At present he is a member of the supervisory board of Eco-Waste, a shareholder and Vice-president of Castle Holding Limited Sp. z o.o. in Warsaw, a consulting firm with experience and knowledge in the area of supporting the development of the privatisation of Polish enterprises. He is at present a member of the Supervisory Board of Stream Cable TV.

William Charles Correll III is 47 years old. He is a US national. He has been Senior Vice President for Finance and Acquisitions since 15 September 2001. He graduated from the University of Bridgeport, Department of Design, and from Rhode Island School of Design and completed a course in economics at Brown University. William Correll has a broad experience in the area of finance, management and investment. He worked for companies such as Integer Group, Inc, United Artists Entertainment Corporation, UnitedGlobalCom, Inc., americas.com, Inc., Vencomm.net, Nupremis, Inc.

Casey Forward is 48 years old. He is a national of Canada. On 18 January 2001 he became Chief Financial Officer of the Company. He completed a three year course at the University of Manitoba in the Department of Molecular Biology. As a Certified General Accountant he has been running an independent accountancy practice in Canada since 1990. He has worked for public companies in Canada, the United States and Great Britain. He has owned companies in Canada and, in particular, in the years 1980-1985 he was the owner and president of a company which was active in the sector of building investments in Edmonton, Canada, and in the years from 1977-1982 he was the owner and president of Gateway Cartage & Storage Ltd, with its seat in Edmonton, engaged in the business of storage and transport. He is a member of the United States Financial Accounting Foundation and a member of the Certified General Accountants of Canada.

Adam Wójcik is 48 years old. Since 2 November 1999 he has been President of the Management Board of Stream Cable TV. He is also our Chief Operating Officer. He graduated from the Jagiellonian University of Krakow, Department of Mathematics and Physics and holds a Ph.D. in mathematical sciences. In the years 1978-1995 he held a research and teaching position at the Mathematics Department of Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza. That time he also spoke many lectures at the universities in Sweden, France and USA. In 1993 he was one of the founders and the president of Housing Cooperative "Nowa" in which currently he holds a welfare position as president. In the years 1993-1995 he was Marketing Manager at Polska Telewizja Kablowa Krakow S.A and in the years 1995-1997 Vice-President of that company. In the years 1997-1999, Adam Wójcik was Vice-President and South Regional Director of Polska Telewizja Kablowa Operator Sp. z o.o.

Dobroslaw Ploskonka was appointed in October 1999. He has worked in the Polish Internet business for the last two years and has successfully established Kraknet S.A., an Internet services provider in Kraków. Mr. Ploskonka also has real estate business interests and is very conversant with the procedures to obtain building permits, etc. Mr. Ploskonka also has very good relationships with many housing co-operatives throughout Southern Poland.

Zbigniew Tragarz was appointed to Eco-Waste in 1997, to PolVoice in September 1999 and to Stream Cable TV in October 1999. Educated at Warsaw Technical College where he earned a degree in electronics, Zbigniew Tragarz continued postgraduate studies in foreign trade. Assigned to the Polish Commercial Counsellors Office in New Delhi for three years, Mr. Tragarz was the resident advisor for the electronics components trade. In 1986, Mr. Tragarz accepted a position as Projects Export Manager with Polkolor, a major electronics production plant where he supervised the company's interests in export and investment in Turkey, China, and the USA. In 1990, he became an associate of INVESCO in Poland and serves as Vice President of Castle Holding Ltd. of Warsaw.

Andrzej Szweryn was appointed to the supervisory board on February 4, 2002. He graduated from the College of Economics in Warzaw and previously worked for Elektrim trading Company specializing in the import of technology, know how and complete plant. For the past 11 years he has been the president of Color Trading Limited that specializes in the import and distribution of medical products in Poland.

Waldemar Dziak, was appointed to the Board of Directors and President on 1st January 1996 and is responsible for the development of the company in Poland. He graduated from the International Affairs Faculty of Warsaw University in 1976 obtaining a doctorate of this faculty in 1982. Dr. Dziak's industrial experience began in January 1990, when he became general manager of Long Frank, the first private waste management company to be formed in Poland. In May 1993, Long Frank was sold to the German waste management company, Lobbe, and Dr. Dziak remained as general manager and, later, as Vice-President and president of the Polish subsidiary of Lobbe in Warsaw until April 1995. In 1994, Dr. Dziak graduated from the "Managing Waste Management Companies" course held by Lobbe at its headquarters in Iscrlohn, Germany and he also graduated from the "Accounting for Managers" course while employed by Lobbe. During his period with Lobbe in Warsaw, he succeeded in quadrupling revenues and securing several profitable and prestigious waste management contracts with, inter alia, the Marriott Hotel, Holiday Inn, the Bristol Hotel, four banks, eight embassies and various other institutions. Following his employment with Lobbe, Dr. Dziak acted as a consultant to a Belgian/German company, preparing a study and marketing research on waste utilization in Beijing, China.

Rafal Skrzeczkowski was appointed in September 1999. Under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Science Mr. Skrzeczkowski has been enrolled since 1997 at the University of Management and Computing Science in Warsaw. He has an extensive expertise in fields of building computer networks, software programming, electronics and Internet services.  Mr. Skrzeczkowski has developed various proprietary software applications related to the telephony and other telecommunication services, presently being implemented by Polvoice.com Ltd. Mr. Skrzeczkowski established a musical portal, Navigator, and one of the top music search engines in Poland, www.mp3.nawigator.pl.

Michal Piwowar was appointed in September 1999. He is currently earning his Bachelor in Business Administration at the University of L. Kozminskiego in Warsaw. Additionally he is earning his degree in Foreign Affairs at University of Warsaw. Mr. Piwowar has extensive experience in implementation of Internet related projects in Poland for small to medium size business entities. Mr. Piwowar is an assistant to Senator Jerzy Pieniazek, member of the Parliament Club, member of Environmental Protection Committee and member of Immigration Committee.

Executive Compensation

For the purpose of this annual statement, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:

"Equity security" means securities of a company that carry a residual right to participate in earnings of that company and, upon liquidation or winding up of that company, its assets;

"Option" means all options, share purchase warrants and rights granted by a company or any of its subsidiaries (if any) as compensation for services rendered or otherwise in connection with office or employment;

"LTIP" means a long-term incentive plan, which is any plan providing compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance to occur over a period longer than one financial year, whether the performance is measured by reference to financial performance of the company or an affiliate of the company, the price for the company's securities, or any other measure, but does not include Option or SAR plans or plans for compensation through restricted shares or restricted share units.

The total compensation we paid during the last fiscal period to all of our directors and officers as a group for services in all capacities was $117,135 CDN.

The following table details the compensation paid to our executive officers for the two months ended December 31, 2001:

|Summary Compensation Table
|--------------------------
|Name                      
|Stanislaw Lis             
|Edward Mazur              
|Iwona Kozak               
|Grzegorz Namyslowski      
|Glenn Little              
|Adam Wójcik               
|Dobroslaw Ploskonka       
|Zbigniew Tragarz          
|Waldemar Dziak            
|Rafal Skrzeczkowski       
|Michal Piwowar            
|Casey Forward             
|Chuck Correll             

* Car allowance

Long-term Incentive Plans - Awards in most recently completed financial period

During its most recently completed financial year, and for the two previously completed financial years, we have not awarded or instituted any LTIP's in favour of its executive officers.

Defined Benefit Plans

We do not have, and at no time during its most recently completed financial year have had, any defined benefit or actuarial plans in respect of which any of its executive officers were eligible to participate.

Options to Purchase Securities From Our Company

In order to create a mechanism for the recruiting of and providing incentives to certain persons and to recognise and reward their contributions to our growth, the Board of Directors adopted the Stock Option Plan ("Plan"). The purpose of the Plan is to encourage such persons to acquire our shares and perceive such transaction as a long-term investment. Options to purchase shares under the Plan are granted to Directors, employees and affiliates of the foregoing.

The Board of Directors is entitled, at its own discretion, to determine which persons will be granted options under the Plan. If the Board of Directors grants any options, it will specify the number of shares that may be purchased pursuant to the option.

While the decision to grant options is in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors, they may base decisions to grant options on the following factors: the annual remuneration of the person in relation to the total of the remuneration paid by us, the duration of employment of such person and the quality of work done by such person, amongst other factors.

As a confirmation of the option grant, the option holder is issued a certificate specifying the date, number of the shares allocated, share purchase price, and the period of time during which the option may be exercised. The Plan and the granting of options constitutes neither a guarantee to potential option holders that they will continue to perform their functions nor a guarantee that we will continue to employ such persons.

Initially 4,375,755 shares have been earmarked for the Plan's implementation, with the following restrictions:

(a) One person may not receive more than 5% of the outstanding shares;

(b) Options granted to one person in a given year may not exceed 5% of the outstanding shares;

(c) Shares allocated to all persons employed in contacts with investors may not exceed 2% of the outstanding shares, unless the rules of the TSX allow for a different limit; and

(d) Shares earmarked for consultants may not exceed 2% of the outstanding shares.

In the event that an option has lapsed for any reason whatsoever without having been exercised in full, the shares with respect to which the option has lapsed may again be issued for the purposes of the Plan.

The expiration date of an option is the date determined by the Board of Directors with respect to individual options, which date, however, may not be later than ten years after the option was granted.

The Board of Directors is also exclusively entitled to determine the purchase price of shares by option holders. The share price may not be lower than the price attained at the closure of the TSX on the day preceding the date of granting the option and may not be lower than the market prices of the shares at the date of granting the option. The options are not negotiable.

For options granted on or before January 2, 2001, vesting occurred immediately. For options granted on November 15, 2001, vesting occurs as follows:

(a) 1/4 of shares on the date of their allocation;

(b) 1/4 of shares six months after their allocation;

(c) 1/4 of shares one year after their allocation;

(d) 1/4 of shares eighteen months after their allocation.

A certificate issued to an authorised person specifies the time limits for the purchase of shares. The Plan specifies the events following which all options become exercisable.

The exercise of an option takes place by way of delivery of a Notice of Exercise, Certificate of the Granting of an Option, and tendering payment for the purchase of the shares.

The Board of Directors may amend the provisions of the share options with the consent of the TSX. The Board may also terminate the Plan.

The conditions of the options require also the formal acceptance by a general meeting of our shareholders. Currently the exercise price of options under the Plan ranges from 1.41 CAD to 2.85 CAD.

The following tables provide the history of options granted and exercised to all directors, officers and employees during the period from November 1, 1998 to December 31, 2001.



|Option Holder        | Options Granted in 1999 | Date Granted | Options Granted in 2000 | Date Exercised | Number of Options Exercised | Balance of Stock Options October 31, 2000 | Exercise Price per Share ($CDN)
|-------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------ | ----------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | -------------------------------
|Glenn A. Little      | 200,000                 | 12-Apr-99    |                         | 28-Mar-00      | 100,000                     | 100,000                                   | 1.41                           
|Grzegorz Namyslowski | 325,000                 | 12-Apr-99    |                         | 4-Feb-00       | 325,000                     | -                                         | 1.41                           
|Grzegorz Namyslowski |                         | 4-Feb-00     | 357,500                 |                |                             | 357,500                                   | 2.62                           
|Iwona Kozak          | 300,000                 | 12-Apr-99    |                         | 15-Feb-00      | 5,000                       |                                           | 1.41                           
|Iwona Kozak          |                         |              |                         | 28-Mar-00      | 50,000                      |                                           | 1.41                           
|Iwona Kozak          |                         |              |                         | 11-May-00      | 25,000                      | 220,000                                   | 1.41                           
|Iwona Kozak          |                         | 26-Jul-00    | 60,000                  |                |                             | 60,000                                    | 2.65                           
|Jan Rynkiewicz       | 325,000                 | 12-Apr-99    |                         | 24-Jan-00      | 325,000                     | -                                         | 1.41                           
|Jan Rynkiewicz       |                         | 27-Jan-00    | 357,500                 | 26-Jul-00      | 357,500                     | -                                         | 1.59                           
|Jan Rynkiewicz       |                         | 26-Jul-00    | 355,000                 |                |                             | 355,000                                   | 2.65                           
|Stanislaw Lis        | 325,000                 | 12-Apr-99    |                         | 24-Jan-00      | 325,000                     | -                                         | 1.41                           
|Stanislaw Lis        |                         | 26-Jul-00    | 355,000                 |                |                             | 355,000                                   | 2.65                           
|Stanislaw Lis        |                         | 27-Jan-00    | 357,500                 | 2-Jun-00       | 12,000                      |                                           | 1.59                           
|Stanislaw Lis        |                         |              |                         | 26-Jul-00      | 345,500                     | -                                         | 1.59                           
|Zbigniew Tragarz     | 325,000                 | 12-Apr-99    |                         | 4-Feb-00       | 325,000                     | -                                         | 1.41                           
|Zbigniew Tragarz     |                         | 4-Feb-00     | 357,500                 |                |                             | 357,500                                   | 2.62                           
|Aziz Shariff         |                         | 26-Jul-00    | 250,000                 |                |                             | 250,000                                   | 2.65                           
|Philip Kaye          |                         | 26-Jul-00    | 40,000                  |                |                             | 40,000                                    | 2.65                           
|Adam Wójcik          |                         | 26-Jul-00    | 25,000                  |                |                             | 25,000                                    | 2.65                           
|Teresa Rzepczyk      | 14,062                  | 12-Apr-99    |                         |                |                             | 14,062                                    | 1.41                           
|Dobroslaw Ploskonka  |                         | 26-Jul-00    | 25,000                  |                |                             | 25,000                                    | 2.65                           
|Totals               | 1,814,062               |              | 2,540,000               |                | 2,195,000                   | 2,159,062                                 |                                



|Option Holder        | Balance of Stock Options at October 31, 2000 | Date Granted | Options Granted in 2001 | Date Exercised | Number of Options Exercised or Expired | Balance of Stock Options at October 31, 2001 | Exercise Price per Share ($CDN) | Expiry date of Options
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ----------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Glenn A. Little      | 100,000                                      | 12-Apr-99    |                         |                |                                        | 100,000                                      | 1.41                            | 12-Apr-04             
|Grzegorz Namyslowski | 357,500                                      | 4-Feb-00     |                         |                |                                        | 357,500                                      | 2.62                            | 4-Feb-05              
|Iwona Kozak          | 220,000                                      | 12-Apr-99    |                         | 5-Jan-01       | 220,000                                | -                                            | 1.41                            |                       
|Iwona Kozak          | 60,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                         |                |                                        | 60,000                                       | 2.65                            | 26-Jul-00             
|Iwona Kozak          |                                              | 2-Jan-01     | 242,000                 |                |                                        | 242,000                                      | 1.60                            | 2-Jan-06              
|Jan Rynkiewicz       | 355,000                                      | 26-Jul-00    |                         |                |                                        | 355,000                                      | 2.65                            | 26-Jul-05             
|Stanislaw Lis        | 355,000                                      | 27-Jan-00    |                         | 22-Dec-00      | 14,000                                 | 341,000                                      | 1.59                            | 27-Jan-05             
|Zbigniew Tragarz     | 357,500                                      | 4-Feb-00     |                         |                |                                        | 357,500                                      | 2.62                            | 4-Feb-05              
|Aziz Shariff         | 250,000                                      | 26-Jul-00    |                         | Forfeited      | 250,000                                |                                              | 2.65                            |                       
|Philip Kaye          | 40,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                         |                |                                        | 40,000                                       | 2.65                            | 26-Jul-05             
|Adam Wójcik          | 25,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                         |                |                                        | 25,000                                       | 2.65                            | 26-Jul-05             
|Teresa Rzepczyk      | 14,062                                       | 12-Apr-99    |                         |                |                                        | 14,062                                       | 2.65                            | 12-Apr-04             
|Dobroslaw Ploskonka  | 25,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                         |                |                                        | 25,000                                       | 2.65                            | 26-Jul-05             
|Totals               | 2,159,062                                    |              | 242,000                 |                | 484,000                                | 1,917,062                                    |                                 |                       





|Option Holder        | Balance of Stock Options at October 31, 2001 | Date Granted | Options Granted in November, December, 2001 | Date Exercised | Number of Options Exercised | Forfeited | Balance of Stock Options at December 31, 2001 | Price per Share | Expiry Date
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------- | --------- | --------------------------------------------- | --------------- | -----------
|Adam Wójcik          | 25,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                                             |                |                             |           | 25,000                                        | 2.65            | 26-Jul-05  
|Adam Wójcik          |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 435,000                                     |                |                             |           | 435,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Alexander Wurm       |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 25,000                                      |                |                             |           | 25,000                                        | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Casey Forward        |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 250,000                                     |                |                             |           | 250,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Dobroslaw Ploskonka  | 25,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                                             |                |                             |           | 25,000                                        | 2.65            | 26-Jul-05  
|Dobroslaw Ploskonka  |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 435,000                                     |                |                             |           | 435,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Ed Mazur             |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 470,000                                     |                |                             |           | 470,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Glenn A. Little      | 100,000                                      | 12-Apr-99    |                                             |                |                             |           | 100,000                                       | 1.41            | 12-Apr-04  
|Glenn A. Little      |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 100,000                                     |                |                             |           | 100,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Grzegorz Namyslowski | 357,500                                      | 4-Feb-00     |                                             |                |                             |           | 357,500                                       | 2.62            | 4-Feb-05   
|Grzegorz Namyslowski |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 257,500                                     |                |                             |           | 257,500                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Iwona Kozak          | 60,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                                             |                |                             |           | 60,000                                        | 2.65            | 26-Jul-05  
|Iwona Kozak          | 242,000                                      | 2-Jan-01     |                                             |                |                             |           | 242,000                                       | 1.60            | 2-Jan-06   
|Iwona Kozak          |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 138,000                                     |                |                             |           | 138,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Jan Rynkiewicz       | 355,000                                      | 26-Jul-00    |                                             |                |                             | 355,000   | -                                             | 2.65            | 26-Jul-05  
|Mike Young           |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 125,000                                     |                |                             |           | 125,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Philip Kaye          | 40,000                                       | 26-Jul-00    |                                             |                |                             |           | 40,000                                        | 2.65            | 26-Jul-05  
|Ping Shen            |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 10,000                                      |                |                             |           | 10,000                                        | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Stanislaw Lis        | 341,000                                      | 27-Jan-00    |                                             |                |                             |           | 341,000                                       | 2.65            | 27-Jan-05  
|Stanislaw Lis        |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 289,000                                     |                |                             |           | 289,000                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Teresa Rzepczyk      | 14,062                                       | 12-Apr-99    |                                             |                |                             |           | 14,062                                        | 1.41            | 12-Apr-04  
|Teresa Rzepczyk      |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 15,938                                      |                |                             |           | 15,938                                        | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Zbigniew Tragarz     | 357,500                                      | 1-Feb-00     |                                             |                |                             |           | 357,500                                       | 2.62            | 1-Feb-05   
|Zbigniew Tragarz     |                                              | 15-Nov-01    | 257,500                                     |                |                             |           | 257,500                                       | 1.60            | 15-Nov-06  
|Totals               | 1,917,062                                    |              | 2,807,938                                   |                | -                           | 355,000   | 4,370,000                                     |                 |            



As of December 31, 2001, our officers and directors as a group hold 4,115,000 options to purchase common stock.



Employees

The average number of employees was as follows:



|                                    | Two months ended December 31, 2001 | Years ended October 31
|----------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------
|2001                                | 2000                               | 1999                  
|Stream Communications Network, Inc. | 5                                  | 5                     
|Stream Cable TV                     | 64                                 | 64                    
|Eco-Waste                           | 2                                  | 2                     
|PolVoice                            | 3                                  | 6                     

ITEM 7 -Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

Major Shareholders

To the best of our knowledge, we are not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by another corporation or by any foreign government.

As at the date of this annual statement the following persons or groups are known to us to each own more than 10% of our issued and outstanding common shares, which as of May 15, 2002 was.

|Name and Address of Shareholder                                                                                                                                         | Number of Securities owned | Percentage of Securities owned
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------------------------
|Aronville Management Limited
Akara Building,
24 De Castro Street,
Wickams Cay 1,
Road Town, Tortola,
British Virgin Islands
(Managed by East European Development Fund) | 3,043,928 
Common shares   | 11.0%                         
|CDS & Co
NCI Account
25 The Esplanade
Toronto, Ontario, M5W 1G5
Canada
(Canadian depository for brokerage houses)                                                       | 10,235,365
Common shares   | 37.5%                         
|Cede & Co
PO Box 20
Bowling Green Station
New York, NY, 10274
( US depository for brokerage houses)                                                                     | 3,048,683
Common shares    | 11.0%                         
|Edward Mazur
Glenview, IL
60025                                                                                                                                         | 4,028,545
Common shares    | 14.6%                         

To the best of our knowledge, there are no arrangements, the operation of which at a subsequent date will result in a change in control of our company.

Related Party Transactions

There are no material transactions during the last three fiscal years or to the date of this information form to which we were or are to be a party, in which any director or officer or person related thereto had or will have a material interest, either directly or indirectly, except to an employment agreement dated May 1, 1998, we pay Castle Holdings Ltd. (beneficially owned by Grzegorz Namyslowski and Zbigniew Tragarz) $15,000 USD ($23,831 CDN, 63,323 zloty) monthly.

Current management feels that the terms of the agreement discussed above are as favourable as could have been obtained from an unaffiliated party based on the individual's expertise and invaluable contacts.

We lease the cable network from Gimsat in which we have a financial interest. The rate is 76,000 PLN per month until June 2003.

On January 15, 2001 pursuant to the change in Polish government policy regarding foreign ownership, we purchased from the other shareholders the balance of issued shares in Stream Cable TV making Stream Cable TV wholly owned. The sum of $97,000 USD ($147,671 CDN, 397,603 zloty) was paid to Castle Holdings Ltd., Adam Wójcik and Dobroslaw Ploskonka, related parties to the Company. The amounts paid to the other shareholders are reimbursements of amounts previously paid.

ITEM 8 -Financial Information

Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge there are no legal proceedings against the Company or any of our subsidiaries.

Pursuant to a legal dispute in which we sued and received judgment against Thermo Tech(TM) Technologies Inc., the parties have agreed to mutual releases in respect to the legal actions between them. Thermo Tech agreed to pay us $500,000 CDN. The release and settlement agreement specifically conclude all outstanding issues related to Supreme Court of British Columbia, New Vancouver Registry Action No. C976669 and SCBC Vancouver Registry No. C982650. Thermo Tech has paid the amount of $500,000 CDN on November 6, 2001.

ITEM 9 -The Listing

Nature of Trading Market

Our common shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange ("TSX"), the successor to the Canadian Venture Exchange , under the symbol "TPP". The rules of this exchange require a trading halt when a company has a change of business. At the present time our stock is halted from trading on the TSX Venture Exchange resulting from a change of business.

The reference to a trading halt are according to the TSX Venture Exchange (the "TSX") Policy 5.2, a "Change of Business" or "COB" means:

"A transaction or series of transactions which will redirect an Issuer's resource towards a business which is of a substantially different nature than its current business, so that over the next 12 months at least 25% of the assets, liabilities, planned expenditures or revenues, management time commitment or issued shares of the Issuer will be devoted to the new business."

Since a majority of our resources are directed towards the operations of Stream Cable TV that is different than our original business of constructing and operating rendering plants in Poland, we are required by Policy 5.2 to issue a news release and notify the TSX of the proposed Change of Business. As soon as we notified the TSX of the proposed Change of Business, the listed shares of the Company were subject to a trading halt. Our shares resumed trading in December 2000, but were halted in February 2001.

Our shares also trade on the over the counter portion of the Frankfurt Exchange in Germany under the symbol "tpj" and in the "Pink Sheets" in the United States under the symbol "TROXF".

Trading on the TSX Venture Exchange

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the TSX Venture Exchange ("TSX") for our common shares for the past five years ended October 31, 1998 to December 31, 2001.



|Year Ended   | High | Low  | Volume   
|------------ | ---- | ---- | ---------
|             | $CDN | $CDN |          
|Dec 31, 2001 | -    | -    | -        
|Oct 31, 2001 | 2.24 | 1.93 | 1,075,621
|Oct 31, 2000 | 4.70 | 1.18 | 9,853,601
|Oct 31, 1999 | 1.80 | 1.01 | 3,209,466
|Oct 31, 1998 | 2.10 | 1.00 | 3,896,896

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the TSX Venture Exchange for our common shares for each quarterly period in the two most recent fiscal periods.



|Quarter Ended  | High | Low  | Volume   
|-------------- | ---- | ---- | ---------
|               | $CDN | $CDN |          
|Dec 31, 2001   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil      
|Oct 31, 2001   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil      
|July 31, 2001  | Nil  | Nil  | Nil      
|April 30, 2001 | Nil  | Nil  | Nil      
|Jan 31, 2001   | 2.24 | 1.93 | 1,075,621

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the TSX Venture Exchange for our common shares for each monthly period in the past six months.



|Month Ended    | High | Low  | Volume
|-------------- | ---- | ---- | ------
|               | $CDN | $CDN |       
|April 30, 2002 | *    | *    | *     
|Mar 31, 2002   | *    | *    | *     
|Feb 28, 2002   | *    | *    | *     
|Jan 31, 2002   | *    | *    | *     
|Dec 31, 2001   | *    | *    | *     
|Nov 30, 2001   | *    | *    | *     

* Our shares halted trading on the TSX in connection with our change in business. Completion of the transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to discussed above, exchange acceptance.

Trading on the Frankfurt Exchange

We were listed for trading on the over the counter portion of the Frankfurt Exchange in Germany on January 2, 2001. The bid price was 1.30 Euro ($1.20 USD, $1.81 CDN) and the ask price was 1.60 Euro ($1.48 USD, $2.23 CDN). There have been no trades on this market.

Trading on the US Pink Sheets

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the US Pink Sheets since November 1998 to December 31, 2001.



|Year Ended   | High | Low  | Volume   
|------------ | ---- | ---- | ---------
|             | $USD | $USD |          
|Dec 31, 2001 | Nil  | Nil  | nil      
|Oct 31, 2001 | 1.53 | 1.26 | 85,500   
|Oct 31, 2000 | 3.30 | 0.07 | 1,942,900
|Oct 31, 1999 | 1.19 | 0.64 | 730,700  

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the US Pink Sheets for our common shares for each quarterly period in the two most recent fiscal periods.



|Quarter Ended  | High | Low  | Volume
|-------------- | ---- | ---- | ------
|               | $USD | $USD |       
|Dec 31, 2001   | Nil  | Nil  | nil   
|Oct 31, 2001   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|July 31, 2001  | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|April 30, 2001 | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|Jan 31, 2001   | 1.53 | 1.26 | 85,500

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the US Pink Sheets for our common shares for each monthly period in the past six months.



|Month Ended    | High | Low  | Volume
|-------------- | ---- | ---- | ------
|               | $USD | $USD |       
|April 30, 2002 | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|Mar 31, 2002   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|Feb 28, 2002   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|Jan 31, 2002   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|Dec 31, 2001   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   
|Nov 30, 2001   | Nil  | Nil  | Nil   

To the best of our knowledge, there are 359 U.S. shareholders on record as at May 15, 2002 holding 7,644,924 common shares or 27.6% of the total issued share capital.

The last trade of our shares on the TSX Venture Exchange was at $2.00 CDN ($1.33 USD, 5.45 zloty) on January 25, 2001. The last trade of our shares on the Pink Sheets was at $1.26 USD ($1.89 CDN, 5.16 zloty) on January 24, 2001.

Item 10 - Additional Information

Share Capital

Our authorized share capital as at December 31, 2001 was 100,000,000 common shares without par value. At October 31, 2001 the issued and outstanding share capital was 21,878,778 common shares and at December 31, 2001 was 27,666,379 common shares.

All our shares, both issued and unissued, are common shares of the same class and rank equally as to dividends, voting powers and participation in assets upon liquidation. At any general meeting, subject to the restrictions on joint registered owners of our common shares, on a show of hands every shareholder who is present in person and entitled to vote has one vote and on a poll every shareholder has one vote for each share of which he or she is the registered owner and may exercise such vote either in person or by proxy. Our directors may, from time to time, declare and authorize payment of dividends. No common shares have been issued subject to call or assessment. There are no pre-emptive or conversion rights. There are no provisions for surrender, sinking or purchase funds. There are no issued and outstanding escrow or performance shares. On April 23, 1997, 246,999 escrowed common shares were cancelled.

Options to acquire common shares granted to our directors and officers are described under "Item 6 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Executive Compensation.

History of Share Capital

The following table is a history of our share capital for the past three years.

|Date        | Details                  |                                                                    | Shares Issued | Price ($ CDN) | Amount ($ CDN)  
|----------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------- | ------------- | ----------------
|10/31/1998  |                          |                                                                    | 18,090,628    |               | $ 15,178,857.00 
|12/16/1998  | warrants                 |                                                                    | 50,000        | $ 1.38        | $ 69,000.00     
|10/31/1999  |                          |                                                                    | 18,140,628    |               | $ 15,247,857.00 
|1/24/2000   | options                  | Jan Rynkiewicz                                                     | 325,000       | $ 1.41        | $ 458,250.00    
|1/24/2000   | options                  | Stan Lis                                                           | 325,000       | $ 1.41        | $ 458,250.00    
|2/4/2000    | options                  | Grzegorz Namyslowski                                               | 325,000       | $ 1.41        | $ 458,250.00    
|2/4/2000    | options                  | Tragarz                                                            | 325,000       | $ 1.41        | $ 458,250.00    
|2/15/2000   | options                  | Iwona Kozak                                                        | 5,000         | $ 1.41        | $ 7,050.00      
|3/28/2000   | options                  | Iwona Kozak                                                        | 50,000        | $ 1.41        | $ 70,500.00     
|3/28/2000   | options                  | Glenn Little                                                       | 100,000       | $ 1.41        | $ 141,000.00    
|7/12/2000   | private placement        | Manulife Regent Global Fund - Eastern Europe Emerging Markets Fund | 120,000       | $ 2.50        | $ 300,000.00    
|7/12/2000   | private placement        | Regent CIS Fund                                                    | 300,000       | $ 2.50        | $ 750,000.00    
|7/12/2000   | private placement        | US Global accolade Regent Eastern Europe Fund                      | 60,000        | $ 2.50        | $ 150,000.00    
|7/12/2000   | private placement        | Victoria Ross                                                      | 100,000       | $ 2.50        | $ 250,000.00    
|7/12/2000   | private placement        | Arbora Portfolio Management                                        | 100,000       | $ 2.50        | $ 250,000.00    
|7/12/2000   | private placement        | Oak Valley Investment Ltd.                                         | 400,000       | $ 2.50        | $ 1,000,000.00  
|7/12/2000   | private placement        | Broadway International Ltd.                                        | 175,000       | $ 2.50        | $ 437,500.00    
|            | value of warrants        | deduct: for Canadian GAAP, fair value of warrant                   |               |               | $ (562,723.00)  
|7/12/2000   | private placement fee    |                                                                    | 24,150        | $ 2.50        | $ 60,375.00     
|5/11/2000   | options                  | Iwona Kozak                                                        | 25,000        | $ 1.41        | $ 35,250.00     
|6/2/2000    | options                  | Stan Lis                                                           | 12,000        | $ 1.59        | $ 19,080.00     
|7/26/2000   | options                  | Stan Lis                                                           | 345,500       | $ 1.59        | $ 549,345.00    
|7/26/2000   | options                  | Jan Rynkiewicz                                                     | 357,500       | $ 1.59        | $ 568,425.00    
|10/31/2000  | warrants                 |                                                                    | 30,000        | $ 2.85        | $ 85,500.00     
|7/12/2000   | issue costs              |                                                                    |               |               | $ (229,375.00)  
|12/22/2000  | options                  | Stan Lis                                                           | 14,000        | $ 2.65        | $ 37,100.00     
|1/5/2001    | options                  |                                                                    | 220,000       | $ 1.41        | $ 310,200.00    
|1/11/2001   | issue costs              | Jones Gable                                                        |               |               |                 
|3/13/2001   | issue costs              | Mike Young                                                         |               |               |                 
|10/31/2001  |                          |                                                                    | 21,878,778    |               | $ 21,310,084.00 
|1/11/2001   | issue costs              | Jones Gable                                                        |               |               | $ (14,000.00)   
|3/13/2001   | issue costs              | Mike Young                                                         |               |               | $ (17,762.50)   
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Victoria Ross                                                      | 100,000       | $ 1.75        | $ 175,000.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Oak Valley Investments                                             | 200,000       | $ 1.75        | $ 350,000.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Allfund Capital Corporation                                        | 55,429        | $ 1.75        | $ 97,001.00     
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Allfund Capital Corporation                                        | 27,714        | $ 1.75        | $ 48,500.00     
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Allfund Capital Corporation                                        | 2,286         | $ 1.75        | $ 4,001.00      
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Sykes Road Ltd.                                                    | 55,429        | $ 1.75        | $ 97,001.00     
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | James Rae                                                          | 55,500        | $ 1.75        | $ 97,125.00     
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Arbora Portfolio                                                   | 60,000        | $ 1.75        | $ 105,000.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Trans Atlantic Securities Ltd.                                     | 199,928       | $ 1.75        | $ 349,874.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | David P. Boehm                                                     | 145,000       | $ 1.75        | $ 253,750.00    
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              | Yorkton Securities                                                 |               |               | $ (27,990.00)   
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              | United Capital Securities                                          |               |               | $ (15,520.00)   
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              | Mike Young                                                         |               |               | $ (28,000.00)   
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              | Wolverton Securities Ltd.                                          |               |               | $ (7,770.00)    
|12/28/2001  | value of warrants        | deduct: for Canadian GAAP, fair value of warrant                   |               |               | $ (293,432.00)  
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              |                                                                    | 20,440        | $ 1.75        | $ 35,770.00     
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Edward A. Mazur                                                    | 300,000       | $ 1.60        | $ 480,000.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Edward A. Mazur                                                    | 2,000,000     | $ 1.60        | $ 3,200,000.00  
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Cordell Leo Couillard &                                            | 62,500        | $ 1.60        | $ 100,000.00    
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              | Roy Gould                                                          |               |               | $ (8,000.00)    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Edward A. Mazur                                                    | 196,795       | $ 1.60        | $ 314,872.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Edward A. Mazur                                                    | 819,625       | $ 1.60        | $ 1,311,400.00  
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              | Ansum                                                              |               |               | $ (5,820.00)    
|12/28/2001  | issue costs              | Rzepczyk                                                           |               |               | $ (6,000.00)    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | David Driedger                                                     | 60,625        | $ 1.60        | $ 97,000.00     
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Casey Forward                                                      | 60,625        | $ 1.60        | $ 97,000.00     
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Edward A. Mazur                                                    | 303,125       | $ 1.60        | $ 485,000.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Edward A. Mazur                                                    | 227,125       | $ 1.60        | $ 363,400.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Oak Valley Investments Ltd.                                        | 528,580       | $ 1.60        | $ 845,728.00    
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Edward A. Mazur                                                    | 181,875       | $ 1.60        | $ 291,000.00    
|12/28/2001  | value of warrants        | deduct: for Canadian GAAP, fair value of warrant                   |               |               | $ (3,181,834.00)
|12/28/2001  | private placement        | Tadeuxz Fox                                                        | 125,000       | $ 3.15        | $ 393,800.00    
|12/28/2001  | value of warrants        | deduct: for Canadian GAAP, fair value of warrant                   |               |               | $ (49,080.00)   
|12/31/2001  | Subscriptions receivable |                                                                    |               |               | (1,136,728.00)  
|12/31/2001  | Total                    |                                                                    | 27,666,379    |               | $ 26,110,369.50 
|1/15/2002   | Subscriptions received   |                                                                    |               |               | $291,000.00     
|2/3/2002    | Subscriptions received   |                                                                    |               |               | $845,728.00     
|3/4/2002    | Exercise warrants        | Oak Valley Investments                                             | 200,000       | $2.85         | $ 570,000.00    
|3/4/2002    | Exercise warrants        | Oak Valley Investments                                             | 100,000       | $2.00         | $ 200,000.00    
|3/4/2002    | Exercise warrants        | Oak Valley Investments                                             | 16,667        | $1.80         | $30,000.00      
|May 7, 2002 | Total                    |                                                                    | 27,983,046    |               | $28,190,672.50  

Memorandum and Articles of Association

We are registered in British Columbia, Canada, certificate of incorporation No. 188691. We do not have any stated "objects" or "purposes" as the Company Act of the Province of British Columbia does not require it. Our memorandum ("Memorandum") has authorized 100,000,000 common shares without par value. Our articles of association ("Articles of Association") contain the following provisions, which also relies on the Company Act of British Columbia (updated to November 2, 2000):

Voting Rights

(i)	Shareholders shall have the right to receive notice of, to attend and to vote at all general meetings. Except as otherwise provided in the Articles of Association, on a show of hands each holder of shares present in person and entitled to vote shall have one vote and upon a poll each such holder who is present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote shall have one vote in respect of every share held by him.

Variation of Class Rights and Alteration of Capital

(i)	We may by ordinary resolution increase the share capital, and cancel any shares which at the date of the passing of the resolution have not been taken or agreed to be taken by any person.

(ii)	By special resolution that requires a three-fourths majority, we may consolidate and divide all or any of the share capital into shares of larger amount, sub-divide the shares into shares of smaller amount.

Transfer of Shares

(i)	Any member can transfer shares by delivering an instrument of transfer to our transfer agent.

Directors

(i)	Our business is managed by the Directors who may exercise all powers subject to the provisions of the Articles of Association and the Company Act of British Columbia.

(ii)	The number of Directors shall be not less than three. At our last annual general meeting, the number of directors was five. A Director shall not be required to hold any shares in the capital of our Company. At each annual general meeting of our Company, all of the board of directors retire and our shareholders elect a new board.

(iii)	A Director shall not vote but can be counted in the quorum present on any motion in respect of any contract, arrangement, transaction or any other proposal in which he has an interest that is to his knowledge a material interest.

(iv)	The Directors shall be paid for their services as Directors such sums (if any) as the Directors may from time to time determine.

(v)	The Directors may be paid all reasonable travelling, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending and returning from meetings of the Directors or any committee of the Directors or general meetings or otherwise in connection with our business.

Borrowing Powers

(i)	The Directors may exercise all of the powers to borrow money and to mortgage or charge its undertakings, properties, assets and uncalled capital, or any part thereof, and, subject to the provisions of the Articles of Association, to issue debentures, debenture stock and other securities whether outright or as security for any debt, liability or obligation of us or of any third party.

Dividends and Distributions on Liquidation to Shareholders

(i)	The Directors may declare dividends, and need not give notice to any member. Subject to any priority, preference or special rights, all dividends shall be declared and paid according to the number of shares held on a specified date with respect of the period of which the dividend is paid.

(ii)	The Directors may pay such interim dividends as they may determine.

(iii)	No dividend shall bear interest.

General Meetings

(i)	Each year we hold a general meeting as the annual general meeting in addition to any other meetings in that year, and not more than 13 months shall elapse between the date of one annual general meeting and that of the next. The annual general meeting shall be held at such time and place as the Directors shall appoint.

(ii)	All general meetings other than annual general meetings are extraordinary general meetings. The Directors may, whenever they think fit, convene an extraordinary general meeting.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has established an audit committee. Our audit committee will recommend a firm to be appointed as independent auditors to audit financial statements and to perform services related to the audit, review the scope and results of the audit with the independent auditors, review with management and the independent auditors our annual operating results and consider the adequacy of the internal accounting procedures and the effect of the procedures relating to the auditors' independence. In addition, the audit committee will monitor the board's corporate governance practices, propose nominees annually for election to the board, make recommendations as to the composition of the committees of the board and review the functioning of the board and the powers, mandates and performance of the committees.

Audit Committee Members:

1.	Edward A. Mazur

2.	Stan L. Lis

3.	Glenn A. Little

Compensation Committee Members:

1.

2.	Stan L. Lis

3.	Iwona Kozak

Corporate Governance Committee

1.	Grzegorz Namyslowski

2.	Iwona Kozak

Exchange Control and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders

There is no law or government decree of regulation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital, or that affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to a non-resident holder of common shares, other than withholding tax requirements.

There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by the articles or other charter documents of a company on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote common shares of a company, other than as provided in the Investment Canada Act, as amended (the "Investment Act").

The Investment Act generally prohibits implementation of a reviewable investment by an individual, government, corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is non-Canadian unless the minister responsible for the Investment Act is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. If an investment by a non-Canadian is not a reviewable investment, it requires the filing of a short notice.

An investment in common shares of a company by a non-Canadian that is a "WTO investor" would be reviewable if the value of the assets of the Company equalled or exceeded $184 million, the threshold established for 1999. In subsequent years, the threshold amount may be increased or decreased in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Act. A WTO investor is a member of the World Trade Organization, current members of which include the European Community, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States, or a WTO investor-controlled entity, as defined in the Investment Act.

An investment in common shares of a company by a non-Canadian, other than a WTO investor, would be reviewable under the Investment Act if it were an investment to acquire control of a company and the value of the assets were $5.0 million.

The Investment Act would not apply to certain transactions in relation to our common shares, including:

An acquisition of common shares of a company by any person made in the ordinary course of that person's business as a trader or dealer in securities;

An acquisition of control of a company by an amalgamation, merger, consolidation or corporate reorganization following which the control of the Company, remains unchanged.

A company with foreign share holdings formed in Poland is under Polishlaw andtreated in the same manner as a company with Polish share holdings. Full repatriation of after-tax profits and capital is allowed, and companies with 100% foreign participation are permitted. Capital introduced into Poland by foreign investors may be freely withdrawn. Full repatriation of profits and divided payments is allowed without obtaining a permit. Companies must account for withholding tax to the Polish Tax authorities on any distributed dividends unless a treaty provided otherwise. To avoid double taxation, Poland has devised tax treaties with more than 60 countries.

Taxation - Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences to United States Investors

This section is to make United States persons aware and caution them as to some of the consequences of investing in the Company (a Canadian company). Taxation of our Company in Poland from a business perspective is discussed in the immediately following section.

A brief description of certain provisions of the tax treaty between Canada and the United States is included below. The consequences of state and local taxes are not considered. The following information is general and security holders should seek the advice of their own tax advisors.

TAXATION OF DIVIDENDS

A holder of a common share who is not resident in Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act will be subject to Canadian withholding tax on dividends paid or credited to the holder of the common share. The rate of withholding tax on dividends is 25% of the amount of the dividend. This rate may be reduced under the provisions of an international tax treaty to which Canada is a party. Under the tax treaty that Canada has entered into with the United States, the rate of Canadian withholding tax is generally reduced to 15%, or 5% in the case of a corporate holder which owns 10% or more of the voting shares. A foreign tax credit for the tax withheld may be available to a holder resident in the United States against U.S. federal income taxes.

DISPOSITION OF COMMON SHARES

A non-resident holder of a common share will not be subject to tax under the Income Tax Act in respect of a capital gain realized on the disposition of a common share unless the common share is a "taxable Canadian property" (as defined in the Income Tax Act). Shares of a corporation that are listed on a prescribed stock exchange are generally not considered to be taxable Canadian property. Taxable Canadian property includes any common share held by a non-resident if used in carrying on a business (other than an insurance business) in Canada. A non-resident whose common shares constitute taxable Canadian property will realize upon disposition, a capital gain (or a capital loss).

One-half of any capital gain realized by a holder (a taxable capital gain) will be included in computing the holder's income.

Non-residents are advised to consult their tax advisers with regard to the availability of a treaty exemption and their own particular circumstances.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

A foreign corporation with one or more U.S. shareholders is a PFIC if 75% or more of its income is passive income or if at least 50% of its assets would be invested in instruments which produce interest, dividends and/or capital gains. Unlike a controlled foreign corporation or a foreign personal holding company, there is no minimum percentage ownership by U.S. shareholder to trigger application of the PFIC rules. If a foreign corporation has a high enough percentage of passive income or assets, it is a PFIC as regards any U.S. shareholder no matter how small their ownership percentage of the foreign corporation and regardless of whether the U.S. shareholders, individually or in the aggregate, have the ability to control the business or investments of the foreign corporation.

If a person owns shares in a PFIC and sells them for a profit, that person must generally pro-rate its profit over all the years it held the shares in the PFIC, pay U.S. income tax on the profit allocated to each year at the highest U.S. rate in effect for that year, and pay interest on all the prior year's tax, computed from the tax return due date for the year to which the income is attributable.

The above rule may not apply if a person elects to treat its investment as a "Qualified Electing Fund" (QEF). This election is made by attaching Form 8621 to the annual tax return. This will permit the annual inclusion of the QEF in a person's pro-rata share of ordinary income and long-term capital gains.

We do not believe it was a passive foreign investment company during the fiscal period ended December 31, 2001 or any other year.

Future Developments

The foregoing discussion is based on existing provisions of the United States tax laws, existing and proposed regulations thereafter, and current administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which are subject to change. Any such changes could affect the validity of this discussion. In addition, the implementation of certain aspects of the PFIC rules requires the issuance of regulations which in many such instances have not yet been promulgated and which may have retroactive effect. Furthermore, legislation has been proposed which would replace the PFIC provisions with a consolidated anti-deferral regime. While this legislation was vetoed, it may be re-introduced in subsequent years.

ALL PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING THE COMMON SHARES.

Taxation in Poland

The Polish tax system has been modernized in recent years. In 1992, corporate profits tax and personal income tax were introduced, followed by value-added tax (VAT) in 1993. Poland also taxes real property, transport vehicles, inheritance and gifts.

Corporate Profits Tax

Polish resident companies are subject to corporate income tax on their worldwide income, while non-residents are subject to corporate income tax only on income derived in the territory of Poland. Worldwide income is a tax base for business entities with registered offices or seats or places of management in Poland. Other entities are taxed on profits earned in Poland only.

Corporations are subject to corporate profits tax at a rate of 30% in 2000. This tax will be reduced at the rate of 2 % per year till year 2004. Income derived by foreign entities from certain sources such as interest, dividends and income from royalties paid abroad, is subject to tax at a rate of 20%, and is frequently reduced by a tax treaty.

Key tax deductions for a SME (Small or medium size enterprise)

A SME is defined in the EU by having less than 250 employees, revenue of less than 40 million Euro (152 million zloty, $37.1 million USD, $55.7 CDN) and assets of less than 27 million Euro (103 million zloty, $25 million USD, $37.6 million CDN).

Depreciation and depletion

Tax depreciation is carried out in accordance with guidelines established by the Ministry of Finance for all SME's, both with and without corporate status. Tax depreciation generally follows the straight - line method, although accelerated depreciation may be available in some circumstances.

Net operating losses

An SME has the right to carry forward a loss incurred in an accounting period by deducting the loss from its taxable income over the next five years to a maximum of 50% in any one year. No loss carry backs are allowed.

Payments to foreign affiliates

SME's can deduct royalties, management services and interest charges paid to foreign affiliates, provided exchange control regulations and transfer-pricing restrictions are observed.

Deduction for taxes paid

Taxes on income and, in most cases, value - added tax (VAT) are not deductible. However, input VAT is deductible for corporate/personal income tax purposes if it cannot be offset against the company's output VAT. Other taxes that are part of expenses are deductible in full.

Non-deductible expenditures

SME's may not deduct certain expenditures, including the following:

Costs of assets subject to depreciation

Expenditure borne on abandoned investments

Unrealised foreign exchange losses

Non-public advertising costs in excess of 0.25 percent of turnover

Investment deductions

SME's (with corporate status) can deduct qualifying investment expenditures from pre-tax profits for corporate income tax purposes. The investment deduction is generally limited to 10 percent of the SME's taxable income in the year the investment was made. In the year following the deduction, SME's can deduct 50 percent of the prior year investment deduction limited to 10 percent of taxable income in that year. This percentage was 15 percent in 1998 and 10 percent in 1999.

Value-Added Tax

VAT applies to the goods sold and the services provided. The standard rate of 22% is reduced to rate of 7% for food products, children's clothing, and other goods and services. Exports are not taxed, however a number of conditions must be met for export of services to have zero tax rate. Exempt from VAT are agricultural products and finance and insurance services.

Individual Income Tax and Expatriate Taxation

Polish residents are subject to tax on worldwide income, while individuals with non-resident status are taxed on Polish income only. Non-residents often may avoid double taxation under protection of treaties about avoidance of double taxation signed by Poland with many countries. The basic rates of individual income tax are progressive and range from 19% to 40% and taxes are imposed on gross income. Personal deductions and allowances are allowed to a small extent. The marginal tax rate of a Polish resident, who earned income in another country, is calculated from aggregated income with the resident's domestic-earned income. Tax paid abroad on income earned abroad, may be deducted from the tax calculated for the aggregate income. Income tax is due within 20 days after the end of the month in which payment of income occurs. In some situations that tax is due in 7 days.

Act on the Polish Language

New regulations on the use of the Polish language, which were effective on May 9, 2000, require that Polish be used in all legal transactions if one or more parties to the transaction is a Polish person. For this purpose, a Polish person includes an individual resident in Poland and a legal entity carrying on business in Poland.

An agreement not written in Polish may not be legally valid. Breaches of the legislation will be subject to a fine and may result in the transaction being disallowed for tax purposes.

With respect to liability for non-compliance with the Act, the exclusive use of a language other than Polish in legal transactions subjects the parties to a fine of 20 to 5,000 zloty ($5 to 1,220 USD, $7 to 1,833 CDN) and for continued non-compliance, eventually a sanction imposing a payment of 100,000 zloty ($24,396 USD, $36,666 CDN).

Statement by Experts

Four valuation reports related to the acquisition of Elektromontaz's assets and of the shares of Bielsat.com, MTK and Gimsat were prepared by Evans & Evans, Inc. Michael A. Evans, MBA, CFA, CBV and Richard W, Evans, MBA, were the individuals principally responsible for these reports. Mr. Michael A. Evans holds: a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Simon Fraser University, British Columbia (1981); a Master's degree in Business Administration from the University of Portland, Oregon (1983) (honours); and the professional designations of Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA); and Chartered Business Valuator (CBV). Mr. Richard W. Evans holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Simon Fraser University, British Columbia (1981); and a Master's degree in Business Administration from the University of Portland, Oregon (1983) (honours).

The company has received authorization from Evans & Evans, Inc. to include its name in the form and context used in this Form 20-F report.

Documents on Display

The public way review a copy of our filings with the SEC, including exhibits and schedules filed with it, at the SEC's public reference facilities in Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms.

Item 11 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Currency and Exchange Rate Risk

We are exposed to changes in financial market conditions as a result of transacting in various foreign currencies and funding of foreign operations.

We determine our market risk utilizing sensitivity analysis, which measures the potential losses in fair value resulting from one or more selected hypothetical changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

We do not hedge currency risk. All of the business operations are in Poland that do not normally import or export products or supplies. The functional currency is the Polish zloty.

If there were a large fluctuation in the exchange rates between Poland and Canada this will impact on the operating results of the company. This could impact in a positive or negative manner. If the Canadian dollar increased against the zloty, then any Canadian funds invested in Poland would be exchanged for a larger number of zloty, thereby making more money available in Poland for the businesses. The converse would create a shortfall of funding. Advancing funds as required so that the time interval for currency fluctuations is as short as possible minimizes risk.

We do not presently believe we have material exposure to potential change in fair value of market sensitive instruments, near-term losses in future earnings and/or cash flows from reasonably possible near-term changes in market rates.

We did not have any foreign currency derivatives outstanding at December 31, 2001. Accordingly, no market risk existed for such instruments at this date.

Item 12 - Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

Warrants

In the past, we issued warrants as part of our private placements. The terms and conditions governing these warrants are provided for in applicable subscription agreements and warrant certificates. Shares that will be issued pursuant to these warrants contain certain restrictions, including resale restrictions. The following table shows the number of shares to which each warrant holder is entitled after exercise of the warrants:

|Warrants Holder                                | Balance of Shares to be Exercised from Warrants Jan 1, 2001 | Date Granted | Number of Shares Permitted to be Purchased from Warrants Granted | Date Exercised/Expired | Number of Shares Purchased/Expired | Balance of Shares to be Exercised from Warrants April 18, 2002 | Price per Share ($ CDN) | Expiry Date
|---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | -----------
|Broadway International Limited                 | 87,500                                                      | 12-Jul-00    |                                                                  |                        |                                    | 87,500                                                         | $ 2.85                  | 12-Jul-02  
|Jones, Gable & Company Limited                 | 20,000                                                      | 12-Jul-00    |                                                                  |                        |                                    | 20,000                                                         | $ 2.85                  | 12-Jul-02  
|Arbora Portfolio Management                    | 50,000                                                      | 12-Jul-00    |                                                                  |                        |                                    | 50,000                                                         | $ 2.85                  | 12-Jul-02  
|Jayvee & Co.                                   | 150,000                                                     | 12-Jul-00    |                                                                  |                        |                                    | 150,000                                                        | $ 2.85                  | 12-Jul-02  
|Roytor & Company                               | 30,000                                                      | 12-Jul-00    |                                                                  |                        |                                    | 30,000                                                         | $ 2.85                  | 12-Jul-02  
|Jayvee & Co.                                   | 60,000                                                      | 12-Jul-00    |                                                                  |                        |                                    | 60,000                                                         | $ 2.85                  | 12-Jul-02  
|Oak Valley Investments Limited                 | 200,000                                                     | 12-Jul-00    |                                                                  | 4-Mar-02               | 200,000                            | -                                                              | $ 2.85                  | 12-Jul-02  
|Victoria Ross                                  |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 50,000                                                           |                        |                                    | 50,000                                                         | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Oak Valley Investments                         |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 100,000                                                          | 4-Mar-02               | 100,000                            | -                                                              | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Allfund Capital Corporation                    |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 42,715                                                           |                        |                                    | 42,715                                                         | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Sykes Road Ltd.                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 27,715                                                           |                        |                                    | 27,715                                                         | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|James Rae                                      |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 27,750                                                           |                        |                                    | 27,750                                                         | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Arbora Portfolio                               |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 30,000                                                           |                        |                                    | 30,000                                                         | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Trans Atlantic Securities Ltd.                 |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 99,964                                                           |                        |                                    | 99,964                                                         | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|David P. Boehm                                 |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 72,500                                                           |                        |                                    | 72,500                                                         | $ 2.00                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Edward A. Mazur                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 150,000                                                          |                        |                                    | 150,000                                                        | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Edward A. Mazur                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 2,000,000                                                        |                        |                                    | 2,000,000                                                      | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Cordell Leo Couillard & Marsene Ross-Couillard |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 62,500                                                           |                        |                                    | 62,500                                                         | $1.80                   | 28-Dec-03  
|Edward A. Mazur                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 196,795                                                          |                        |                                    | 196,795                                                        | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Edward A. Mazur                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 819,625                                                          |                        |                                    | 819,625                                                        | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|David Driedger                                 |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 60,625                                                           |                        |                                    | 60,625                                                         | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Casey Forward                                  |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 60,625                                                           |                        |                                    | 60,625                                                         | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Tadeuxz Fox                                    |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 125,000                                                          |                        |                                    | 125,000                                                        | $ 2.25 USD              | 28-Dec-03  
|Edward A. Mazur                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 303,125                                                          |                        |                                    | 303,125                                                        | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Edward A. Mazur                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 227,125                                                          |                        |                                    | 227,125                                                        | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Oak Valley Investments Ltd.                    |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 528,580                                                          | 4-Mar-02               | 16,667                             | 511,913                                                        | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Edward A. Mazur                                |                                                             | 28-Dec-01    | 181,875                                                          |                        |                                    | 181,875                                                        | $ 1.80                  | 28-Dec-03  
|Totals                                         | 597,500                                                     |              | 5,166,518                                                        |                        | 316,667                            | 5,447,351                                                      |                         |            

Shares issued upon exercise of a warrant may not be resold until the hold period on the private placement has ended. The only hold period on warrants still in effect pertains to the above-mentioned private placements where these shares and/or warrants cannot be resold until December 30, 2002.

PART II

ITEM 13 -Defaults, Dividends, Arrearages and Delinquencies

Not applicable

ITEM 14 -Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds



Not applicable



PART III



ITEM 17 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



See Financial Statements attached hereto.



ITEM 18 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Not applicable.



ITEM 19 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS



Financial Statements

















Exhibits



SIGNATURE PAGE





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this annual statements to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Dated: 	June 4, 2002



ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY,

STREAM COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, INC.

Per:



/s/ Casey Forward

Casey Forward, Chief Financial Officer