alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 of Provision Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curt Thornton, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Date: November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Curt ThorntonChief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board,

President and Director(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               7,823
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (1,222)
<INVENTORY>                                          2,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    34,960
<PP&E>                                             155,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (8,892)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,112,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               39,827
<BONDS>                                            681,624
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                              29
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,112,785
<SALES>                                              2,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    43,275
<CGS>                                                5,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       35,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (37)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (10,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (3,828)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (6,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (6,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                                   


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of
2002, I, Cathy L. Wood, as Chief Financial Officer of SM&A (the Company) hereby certify
that, based on my knowledge: 1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: April 16, 2004
    /s/  CATHY L. WOODCathy L. WoodExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      335289
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            338193
<PP&E>                                        3088
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2328308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       122988
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      1676
<OTHER-SE>                                 2203644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2328308
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1077
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            254949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (253872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (253872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (253872)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.03)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

JERRY L. GENT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 99-1431

RADFORD UNIVERSITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.

B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge.

(MISC-99-1)

Submitted: July 8, 1999

Decided: July 16, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Jerry L. Gent appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his

motion to proceed in forma pauperis and noting that the case would

be dismissed with no further action of the court if Gent failed to pay

the filing fee within fourteen days. The magistrate judge may only

enter dispositive orders if the parties consent to the magistrate judge's

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp.

1999). Because the parties did not consent to the magistrate judge's

jurisdiction, proper review of the magistrate judge's order is in the

district court. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b). This court has no jurisdiction

over the appeal. See Tripati v. Rison, 847 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. 1988);

see also Mendes Junior Int'l Co. v. M/V Sokai Maru , 978 F.2d 920,

924 (5th Cir. 1992); Silberstein v. Silberstein , 859 F.2d 40, 41-42 (7th

Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for

further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106

(1994). We grant Gent's motion to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED

 2
# L_2013192EN.01S00301.xml

| 13.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11009

Summary Calendar

 

ERIC ADAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOE DONALDSON; SHIRLEY HAINES; DARWIN SANDERS;

RUDY SANCHEZ; ROBERT WHITE; KEITH REAGANS; JAMES

FRAWNER; ROBERT CHANCE; STEPHEN THOMPSON; MICHAEL

SAVERS; ROCHELLE McKINNEY; MARIANNE MUNSELLE; JOE

NUNN; DARRELL SHAPLEY; ALFRED WILSON; TERRY

DITTBERNER,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-121

- - - - - - - - - -

May 21, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric Adams, a Texas prisoner (# 626162), requests permission

to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the appeal of the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. On January 9, 1997,

Chief Judge Politz ordered Adams either to pay the $105 filing

fee or to file financial documents required by the Prison
No. 96-11009

- 2 -

Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”). Among the required

financial documents was a certified statement of his trust-fund

account “for the six-month period immediately preceding the date

of the filing of [his] notice of appeal, August 15, 1996.” 

Although Adams timely responded, the “In-Forma-Pauperis Data”

form submitted by Adams does not comply with the PLRA

requirements because it contains information regarding his prison

trust account for the incorrect six-month period. See § 1915(a),

(b). Accordingly, Adams’ motion for leave to proceed IFP on

appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See 5th Cir. R. 42.3. Should Adams wish to

reinstate his appeal, he is instructed to pay the $105 filing fee

to the clerk of the district court within 30 days from the date

of this order.

Adams’ “Motion for Judicial Notice” is DENIED.

 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO BE RECONSIDERED GRANTED; MOTION TO

PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
No. 68602.

protests 58/19161, etc. (New York).

#### Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Carmel Vernia
Carmel VerniaChief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           2,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,288
<PP&E>                                          18,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,532
<BONDS>                                          3,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,971
<SALES>                                         27,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,426
<CGS>                                           22,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  98
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,741
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,146
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,595
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,595
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (140)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,804
<PP&E>                                           7,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        120
<COMMON>                                         1,585
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,422
<SALES>                                         15,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,172
<CGS>                                           10,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    828
<INCOME-TAX>                                       335
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       493
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

October 2, 1952

No. 56882.

#### International Expediters, Inc. v. United States,

protests 187348-K, etc. (New York).

*380Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of slippers for housewear in chief value of leather similar in all material respects to exhibit 1 in *Weigert-Dagen et al.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 105, C. D. 1272), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended April 30, 2010, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/ THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 105

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals a deduction

for Social Security taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. KNOLLENBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow

individuals a deduction for Social Security taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Fairness

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 164 of

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to deduction

9 of one-half of self-employment taxes) is amended to read

10 as follows:
2

•HR 105 IH

1 ‘‘(f) DEDUCTION FOR EMPLOYEE PORTION OF SO2 CIAL SECURITY TAXES.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individ4 ual, in addition to the taxes described in subsection

5 (a), there shall be allowed as a deduction for the

6 taxable year an amount equal to the social security

7 taxes for such taxable year.

8 ‘‘(2) SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES.—For purposes

9 of paragraph (1)—

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘social secu11 rity taxes’ means, with respect to any taxpayer

12 for any taxable year—

13 ‘‘(i) the amount of the taxes imposed

14 by sections 3101 and 3201(a) on amounts

15 received by the taxpayer during the cal16 endar year in which the taxable year be17 gins,

18 ‘‘(ii) 50 percent of the taxes imposed

19 by section 1401 on the self-employment in20 come of the taxpayer for the taxable year,

21 and

22 ‘‘(iii) 50 percent of the taxes imposed

23 by section 3211(a)(1) on amounts received

24 by the taxpayer during the calendar year

25 in which the taxable year begins.
3

•HR 105 IH

1 ‘‘(B) COORDINATION WITH SPECIAL RE2 FUND OF SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES.—The term

3 ‘social security taxes’ shall not include any

4 taxes to the extent the taxpayer is entitled to

5 a special refund of such taxes under section

6 6413(c).

7 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE.—Any amounts paid

8 pursuant to an agreement under section 3121(l)

9 (relating to agreements entered into by Amer10 ican employers with respect to foreign affiliates)

11 which are equivalent to the taxes referred to in

12 subparagraph (A)(i) shall be treated as taxes

13 referred to in such subparagraph.

14 ‘‘(3) DEDUCTION TREATED AS ATTRIBUTABLE

15 TO TRADE OR BUSINESS.—For purposes of this

16 chapter, the deduction allowed by paragraph (1)

17 shall be treated as attributable to a trade or busi18 ness carried on by the taxpayer which does not con19 sist of the performance of services by the taxpayer

20 as an employee.’’

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of

22 section 275(a) of such Code is amended by inserting ‘‘Ex23 cept as provided in section 164(f),’’ before ‘‘Federal in24 come’’.
4

•HR 105 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

3 December 31, 1998.

Æ
From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org>

To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/12/2011 04:13 PM

Subject: Corrections and Supplemental Comments of Vinyl Institute on PVC MACT Proposed Rule

Dear Ms. Howard,

During our post comment review, the VI uncovered some database anomalies that should be called to your attention as they need to be corrected. Some analyte names at one PVC producer were incorrectly identified in VI’s 30 day concentration database. The error has been corrected in the attached version of the database and the resultant recalculations explained in the attached supplemental comments. Further corrections to information in our comments originally submitted on August 2, 2011 are explained and a copy of the corrected comments is also attached. Finally, the VI is offering clarification of the proposed subcategorization definitions and the trigger date for new sources.

A disk is being sent by Keller and Heckman via FedEx Overnight to your attention that contains these files, and the disk will have 4 additional large Excel files that detail the calculations for TOHAP for both existing and new sources using the corrected 30 day concentration database.

Should any questions arise after reviewing this information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.

Richard Krock Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute 1737 King Street Suite 390 Alexandria, VA 22314 Direct: 571.970.3392 Mobile: 571.216.4474 Fax: 571.970.3271 Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylindesign.com(See attached file: VI PVC Industry Resin 30 day Conc Data Agg for EPA 8-26-11rev5.xls)(See attached file: VI PVC MACT Supplemental Comments 09-12-11.pdf)(See attached file: Corrected VI PVC MACT Working Group Comments 09-12-11.pdf)