74982 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 210 / Wednesday, November 1, 2023 / Notices 

security of the Limited Access DMF, as 

required by the final rule. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

ACAB Systems Safeguards Attestation 

Form: NTIS expects to receive 

approximately 240 ACAB Systems 

Safeguards Attestation Forms from 

Persons and Certified Persons annually. 

AG or IG Systems Safeguards 

Attestation Form: NTIS expects to 

receive approximately 20 AG or IG 

Systems Safeguards Attestation Forms 

from Persons and Certified Persons 

annually. 

Estimated Time per Response: ACAB 

Systems Safeguards Attestation Form: 3 

hours. AG or IG Systems Safeguards 

Attestation Form: 3 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: ACAB Systems Safeguards 

Attestation Form: 720 (240 × 3 hours = 

720 hours). AG or IG Systems 

Safeguards Attestation Form: 60 (20 × 3 

hours = 60 hours). 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: ACAB Systems Safeguards 

Attestation Form: NTIS expects to 

receive approximately 240 ACAB 

Systems Safeguards Attestation Forms 

annually at a fee of $247 per form, for 

a total cost of $59,280. This total annual 

cost reflects the cost to the Federal 

Government for the ACAB Systems 

Safeguards Attestation Forms, which 

consists of the expenses associated with 

NTIS personnel reviewing and 

processing these forms. NTIS estimates 

that it will take ACAB’s senior auditor 

three hours to complete the form at a 

rate of approximately $204 per hour, for 

a total additional cost to the public of 

$146,880 (720 burden hours × $204/ 

hour = $146,880). NTIS estimates the 

total annual cost to the public for the 

ACAB Systems Safeguards forms to be 

$206,160 ($59,280 in fees + $146,880 in 

staff time = $206,160). AG or IG Systems 

Safeguards Attestation Form: NTIS 

expects to receive approximately 20 AG 

or IG Systems Safeguards Attestation 

Forms annually at a fee of $247 per 

form, for a total cost of $4,940. This total 

annual cost reflects the cost to the 

Federal Government for the AG or IG 

Systems Safeguards Attestation Forms, 

which consists of the expenses 

associated with NTIS personnel 

reviewing and processing these forms. 

NTIS estimates that it will take an AG 

or IG senior auditor three hours to 

complete the form at a rate of 

approximately $204 per hour, for a total 

additional cost to the public of $12,240 

(60 burden hours × $204/hour = 

$12,240). NTIS estimates the total 

annual cost to the public for AG or IG 

Systems Safeguards Attestation Forms 

to be $17,180 ($4,940 in fees + $12,240 

in staff time = $17,180). 

NTIS estimates the total annual cost 

to the public for both the ACAB Systems 

Safeguards Attestation Forms and the 

AG or IG Systems Safeguards 

Attestation Forms to be $223,340 

($206,160 for ACAB Systems Safeguards 

Attestation Forms + $17,180 for AG or 

IG Systems Safeguards Attestation 

Forms). 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

Legal Authority: Section 203 of the 

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, Public 

Law 113–67; 15 CFR part 1110. 

IV. Request for Comments 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 

accuracy of our estimate of the time and 

cost burden for this proposed collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (d) Minimize the 

reporting burden on those who are to 

respond, including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. We will include or 

summarize each comment in our request 

to OMB to approve this Information 

Collection Review (ICR). Before 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you may ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Under Secretary of Economic Affairs, 

Commerce Department. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24127 Filed 10–31–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Air Force 

[Docket ID: USAF–2022–HQ–0010] 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, 

Department of Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: 30-Day information collection 

notice. 

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for clearance the following 

proposal for collection of information 

under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by December 1, 

2023. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Angela Duncan, 571–372–7574, whs.mcalex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-informationcollections@mail.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title; Associated Form; and OMB 

Number: Fire Emergency Services— 

Information Management System (FES– 

IMS) Personnel Information; OMB 

Control Number 0701–FESR. 

Type of Request: Existing collection in 

use without an OMB Control Number. 

Number of Respondents: 2,000. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Annual Responses: 2,000. 

Average Burden per Response: 15 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 500. 

Needs and Uses: Information 

collection is necessary to establish user 

accounts for Fire and Emergency 

Services—Information Management 

System (FES–IMS) users. Users are Fire 

Department support personnel 

including Air Force Active Duty, Air 

National Guard, Air Force Reserve 

personnel, Air Force Department of 

Defense Civilians, and Air Force Civil 

Engineering contractors. Air Force DoD 

Civilians and Contracted employees at 

OCONUS locations may include foreign 

nationals employed at U.S. Military 

facilities. Data collected supports the 

daily operations of Air Force Fire 

Departments and Emergency Dispatch 

Centers for personnel tracking, shift 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 210 / Wednesday, November 1, 2023 / Notices 74983 

scheduling, training requirements 

tracking, and documenting after-action 

reports of an incident. This information 

is critical to protect installation 

resources, equipment, and personnel 

that require emergency services. 

The data collected consists of 26 

questions used to develop the personnel 

profile for the individual within the 

system. Information is collected from 

respondents via a face-to-face interview 

conducted at the respective duty 

location. The interview will be hosted 

and carried out by a uniformed military 

member or government civilian, 

assigned the FES–IMS ‘‘Core Data’’ 

collection role. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet 

Seehra. 

You may also submit comments and 

recommendations, identified by Docket 

ID number and title, by the following 

method: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, Docket 

ID number, and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the internet at http://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Angela 

Duncan. 

Requests for copies of the information 

collection proposal should be sent to 

Ms. Duncan at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dddod-information-collections@mail.mil. 

Dated: October 24, 2023. 

Aaron T. Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24062 Filed 10–31–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Air Force 

[Docket ID: USAF–2023–HQ–0007] 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, 

Department of Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: 30-Day information collection 

notice. 

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for clearance the following 

proposal for collection of information 

under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by December 1, 

2023. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Angela Duncan, 571–372–7574 whs.mcalex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-informationcollections@mail.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title; Associated Form; and OMB 

Number: Qualitative Study of Factors 

that Influence Healthcare Seeking in 

Pilots; OMB Control Number 0701– 

TPHB. 

Type of Request: New. 

Number of Respondents: 100. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Annual Responses: 100. 

Average Burden per Response: 48 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 80. 

Needs and Uses: Information 

collection via semi-structured 

interviews is necessary to conduct a 

qualitative study of US Air Force active 

duty pilots, US Air Force trainee pilots, 

civilian collegiate aviation students, and 

commercial airline pilots. Data 

collection will focus on the following: 

(1) factors that negatively influence 

healthcare utilization and aeromedical 

disclosure during screening, (2) factors 

that support healthcare utilization and 

aeromedical disclosure during 

screening, and (3) factors that can be 

modified to address pilot healthcare 

avoidance from a pilot’s perspective to 

inform future prospective research. This 

study has been approved as part of the 

FY22 Studies and Analysis (S&A) 

Portfolio by the Commander of the 

United States School of Aerospace 

Medicine (USAFSAM). The Air Force 

Aerospace and Operational Medicine 

(AO) Panel (lead by the AFMRA/SG3P) 

provides baseline S&A funds to 

USAFSAM to address urgent and nearterm needs, issues, and consultative 

questions that arise from installations, 

the Aerospace Medicine Community 

(Team-SGP) and Line of the Air Force 

senior leadership and commanders that 

are appropriate for one-year, short term 

investigative work. 

Aircraft pilots are required to meet 

certain medical standards in order to 

function as a required aircrew member. 

If a pilot develops a new symptom or 

condition and discloses it during 

aeromedical screening, the pilot runs 

the risk of temporary or permanent loss 

of their flying status. This can result in 

negative occupational, social, and 

financial repercussions for the pilot. For 

this reason, it has been hypothesized 

that a subset of pilots participates in 

healthcare avoidance or does not fully 

disclose during aeromedical screening 

due to fear for aeromedical certificate 

loss. Evolving data is beginning to 

clarify the vast scope of this issue. A 

recent publication of over 3,500 US 

pilots showed that 56.1% of pilots 

reported a history of healthcare 

avoidance behavior due to fear for loss 

of aeromedical certification (1). More 

concerning, 60.1% of another sample of 

US pilots reported delaying or forgoing 

medical care due to fear for loss of 

flying status (2). Healthcare avoidance 

in aircraft pilots due to fear for loss of 

flying status may be prevalent, but many 

unanswered questions remain about 

factors that influence healthcare 

utilization and medical disclosure 

during aeromedical screening. 

Research on pilot healthcare 

avoidance is critical to maintain 

military readiness for the following 

reasons: (1) optimizing existing medical 

assets increases the efficiency and 

effectiveness of warfighting capability 

without increased investment; (2) early 

presentation to medical care can 

increase the operational career and 

medical readiness of pilots, resulting in 

increased readiness efficacy and cost 

savings; and (3) research on pilots can 

inform how the aeromedical system 

supports this generation of pilots in the 

future (this population of pilots is 

hypothesized to have different 

healthcare preferences and behaviors 

from previous generations of pilots). 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Frequency: Once. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet 

Seehra. 

You may also submit comments and 

recommendations, identified by Docket 

ID number and title, by the following 

method: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, Docket 

ID number, and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1