alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SHOPKO STORES INC. AT AND FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AS RESTATED FOR DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                          26,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  185,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,826
<INVENTORY>                                    663,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               885,262
<PP&E>                                       1,497,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 587,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,083,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          814,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           304
<OTHER-SE>                                     694,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,083,289
<SALES>                                      3,048,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,061,662
<CGS>                                        2,257,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,909,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                160,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                   8,799
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,776)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,180
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.57


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

March 20, 1958

No. 61706.

#### Criterion Bead & Novelty Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 310314-K and 310338-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing that the protests were filed prior to liquidation, they were dismissed as having been prematurely filed.
No. 52444.

protest 132231-K (New York).

#### Electrolux Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony produced at the trial, together with an examination of the official papers in evidence, it was apparent that the disputed items were never received and apparently were not shipped. The plaintiff having sustained its burden of proof on the issue of nonimportation, the protest was sustained as to the items in question. *(United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.,*34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351, and *United States*v. *Washington State Liquor Control Board,*id. 118, C. A. D. 352, followed.)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00454-CV

R. D. and S. C., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 2015-0550, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellants R.D. and S.C. filed their notices of appeal on July 5, 2016 and July 13, 

2016 respectively. The appellate record was complete August 10, 2016, making appellants’

briefs due August 30, 2016. On August 25, 2016, counsel for S.C. filed a motion for extension 

of time to file appellant’s brief. 

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition 

of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) 

(providing 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this 

Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion in part and 

order counsel for R.D. and S.C. to file appellants’ briefs no later than September 14, 2016. If the 

briefs are not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why they should not be 

held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on August 26, 2016.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland
Exhibit 31.2

**Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to        Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Annette Eggert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 13, 2010

|                    |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Annette Eggert      |
|                    |
|                         |
| Annette Eggert          |
| Chief Financial Officer |

----
141111111111111111 PUBLIC 

PUBLIC

Prepared by 

Office of the Executive Director 

Director, Division of Security and Systems Assurance 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

888 First Street, N.E., 

Washington, D.C. 

February 2008

Policy for Auditing FERC’s Compliance with its Public Website’s 

Posted Privacy Policy 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Website Privacy Policy 

1.0 BACKGROUND 

The Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA) (Title III, Pub. L. No. 107-

347) requires federal agencies to annually report their security and privacy programs. The Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) provides instructions on complying with the requirements of 

FISMA. On July 17, 2006, OMB issued a memorandum for heads of executive departments and 

agencies, M-06-20, “FY 2006 Reporting Instructions for the Federal Information Security 

Management Act and Agency Privacy Management” requiring each agency to determine 

continued compliance with its public website’s posted privacy policy. 

To that end, FERC will compare its information collection practices on its website with its 

posted FERC website privacy policy annually to ensure compliance with its stated website 

privacy policy. 

2.0 PURPOSE 

The purpose of this document is to establish FERC policy and procedures on auditing its 

compliance with its posted website privacy policy. 

3.0 SCOPE 

This policy applies to FERC staff, consultants and contractors. 

4.0 POLICY 

It is FERC policy that: 

FERC will audit all FERC sponsored websites annually to ensure that its information collection 

practices are in compliance with the posted website privacy policy. 

5.0 PROCESS 

To comply with this policy FERC will identify all information collection points on all FERC 

sponsored websites. FERC will identify what information is collected, and then will compare 

these information collection practices with the FERC website privacy policy to ensure that the 

information collection practices comply with the policy. 

6.0 SECURITY CONTROLS 

Not applicable. 

7.0 COMPLIANCE 

FERC will manually audit actual www.ferc.gov information collections to ensure the website’s 

compliance with the posted website privacy policy. However, in the future FERC may use 

automated techniques. 

1
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Website Privacy Policy 

8.0 AUTHORITY 

This policy is authorized by the Senior Agency Official for Privacy. 

9.0 CONTACT 

Questions concerning this policy should be addressed to the Privacy Officer, John White, 202-

502-8341 or emailed to john.white@ferc.gov. 

10.0 EFFECTIVE DATE 

This policy is effective upon issuance. 

REFERENCES 

1) Office of Management and Budget (OMB) M-06-20, “FY 2006 Reporting Instructions 

for the Federal Information Security Management Act and Agency Privacy Management” 

2) Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA) (Title III, Pub. L. 

No. 107-347) 

2
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Website Privacy Policy 

3
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10255

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Steven Flores Silva, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:21-CR-138-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Steven Flores 

Silva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Silva has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10255 Document: 00516367617 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2022
No. 22-10255

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10255 Document: 00516367617 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2022
Before the Second Division,

January 28, 1948

No. 52139.

protests 670163-G, etc. (New York).

#### Louis Meyers & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of North American Insurance Leaders, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WILLIAM R. DE
JONGEWilliam R. de Jonge Principal Executive Officer


September 28, 2006
IIA

Calendar No. 428

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 84

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 24, 2000

Received and read the first time

JANUARY 25, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting
2

HJ 84 PCS

1 ‘‘December 3, 1999’’, and by striking ‘‘$346,483,754’’ in

2 section 119 and inserting ‘‘$755,719,054’’. Public Law

3 106–46 is amended by striking ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ and

4 inserting ‘‘December 3, 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 428

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 84

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.

JANUARY 24, 2000

Received and read the first time

JANUARY 25, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
No. 49896.

#### Protest 816436-G of American Overocean Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cotton rags the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Schapiro*(24 C. C. P. A. 343, T. D. 48771) and that the percentages of rags in the shipment used chiefly for paper making were the same as those involved in the cited case. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1750 was sustained to that extent.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
OF
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of SouthPeak Interactive
Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Melanie
Mroz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Melanie Mroz,
interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies: pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
October 13, 2009
 
 
 /s/
      Melanie MrozMelanie
      MrozPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial
      Officer
<PAGE>

     AMENDMENT TO THE OCTOBER 19, 2002 CONSULTING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
       ENERTECK CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND ALLAN F. DOW & ASSOCIATES, INC.

         THIS AMENDMENT TO the October 10, 2002 Consulting Agreement by and
between EnerTeck Chemical Corporation and Allan F. Dow & Associates, Inc. (this
"Amendment") is made and entered into as of March 18, 2003, by and among
EnerTeck Chemical Corporation, a Texas corporation (the "Company"), Gold Bond
Resources, Inc., a Washington State corporation) (the "Public Company") and
Allan F. Dow & Associates, Inc., also a Texas corporation (the "Consultant") on
the other hand the "Parties").

         Paragraph numbered 5 of the October 10, 2002 Consulting Agreement is
hereby amended to include the following;

"The five year warrants to be issued to the Consultant by the Public Company
pursuant to this Paragraph 5 will be for 4,981,500 shares of the Public
Company's Common Stock with an exercise price of $.12 per share."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


THE COMPANY                                  THE CONSULTANT

EnerTeck Chemical Corporation                Allan F. Dow & Associates, Inc.
a Texas  corporation                         a Texas corporation


By:  /s/ Dwaine Reese                        By: /s/ Kenneth O'Neill Sr.
 Dwaine Reese                                    Kenneth O'Neill Sr.
Chief Operating Officer and Chairman         Vice President


THE PUBLIC COMPANY

Gold Bond Resources, Inc.
a Washington State  corporation


By:  ---------------------------------------
Dwaine Reese
Chief Operating Officer and Chairman

GOBM.AFDcnsltAMEND
Before the Second Division,

November 8, 1961

No. 66204.

#### Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/30774-11541, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Advancing Statewide Spatial Data Infrastructures in Support of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI)

__________________________________________________________________________________

***Success Factors and Pitfalls of Strategic Planning Efforts***

***The intended purpose of this table was to compile a set of success factors and pitfalls in one place, as a handy reference for discussion and consensus-building as part of the planning process.***

PAGE  

Page 1 of 4March 2006Version 1.2

©2006 Applied Geographics, Inc Produced by NSGIC for the FGDC
No. P68/124.

protests 64/13409, etc. (New York).

#### Gitkin Co. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors *1014similar ill all material respects to those the subject of *Gitkin Co.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997) or louvered, folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)-CE22-003, Rigorously Evaluating 
Programs and Policies to Prevent Child Sexual Abuse (CSA).
    Date: April 11, 2024.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Videoconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Mikel L. Walters, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and 
Control, Centers for Disease and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, 
Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30341. Telephone: (404) 639-0913; 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f22380e031b0a1d1c2f0c0b0c41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="521f05333e26372021123136317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-24239 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 61215.

protests 310897-K, etc. (New York).

#### H. S. Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*436Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
Before the First Division,

November 3, 1958

No. 62420.

#### James G. Wiley and Arrow Sales, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 317112-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric motors similar to those the subject of Abstract 61383, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 52135.

protest 132485-K (New York).

#### Barr Shipping Co. *v.*United States,

*255Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.