alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 54514.

#### E. B. Baehr *&*Sons *v.*United States,

protest 154809-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 76

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the social problem of child abuse and

neglect, and supporting efforts to enhance publicawareness of it.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 76

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas more than 3,000,000 American children are reported as suspected victims of child abuse and neglect

annually;

Whereas more than 500,000 American children are unable to

live safely with their families and are placed in foster

homes and institutions;
2

•HCON 76 EH

Whereas it is estimated that more than 1,000 children, 78

percent under the age of 5 and 38 percent under the age

of 1, lose their lives as a direct result of abuse and neglect every year in America;

Whereas this tragic social problem results in human and economic costs due to its relationship to crime and delinquency, drug and alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and

welfare dependency; and

Whereas Childhelp USA has initiated a ‘‘Day of Hope’’ to be

observed on the first Wednesday in April, during Child

Abuse Prevention Month, to focus public awareness on

this social ill: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that—

4 (A) all Americans should keep these vic5 timized children in their thoughts and prayers;

6 (B) all Americans should seek to break

7 this cycle of abuse and neglect, and give our

8 children hope for the future; and

9 (C) the faith community, nonprofit organi10 zations, and volunteers across America should

11 recommit themselves and mobilize their re12 sources to assist these children; and

13 (2) the Congress—

14 (A) supports the goals and ideas of the

15 ‘‘Day of Hope’’; and
3

•HCON 76 EH

1 (B) commends Childhelp USA for its ef2 forts on behalf of abused and neglected children

3 everywhere.

Passed the House of Representatives February 14,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 355 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 355

     Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding environmental 
   contamination and health effects emanating from the former United 
             States military facilities in the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2000

Mr. Underwood submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding environmental 
   contamination and health effects emanating from the former United 
             States military facilities in the Philippines.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
    That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the Secretary of State, in cooperation with the 
        Secretary of Defense, should work with the Government of the 
        Philippines and with appropriate nongovernmental organizations 
        in the United States and the Philippines to fully identify and 
        share all relevant information concerning environmental 
        contamination and health effects emanating from former United 
        States military facilities in the Philippines following the 
        departure of United States military forces from the Philippines 
        in 1992; and
            (2) the United States should work with the Government of 
        the Philippines to help ameliorate the environmental 
        contamination and health effects emanating from former United 
        States military facilities in the Philippines following the 
        departure of United States military forces from the Philippines 
        in 1992.
                                 <all>
```
## ALASK A JUNEA U AERONAUTICS , INC
. Ma y 21 , 201 0 VI A EMAIL Denni s DeVan y EA S Chie f .X5 3 roo m640 1 40 0 7* ^ St . S.W . Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr . DeVany : Pleas e accep t

thi s letter a s areques t

fo r servic e chang e fo

r El Dorad o an d Ho t

Springs , AR . We propos e eac h city hav e tw o roun d trip s t o Memphi s (MEM ) an d on e roun d tri p t o Dalla s (DAL ) si x day s per week . Thi s i s base d o n th e succes s Harriso n i s alread y showin g a s aresul t

of havin g additional choic e of destinations . We hav e receive dpositiv e feedbac k frombot h communitie s for

thi s change . W e reserv e th e right t o chang e th e servic e bac k t o th e original pattern i

f afte r si x month s enplanement s hav e no t

improved . A sampl e schedul e i s attache dfo r your review . Sincerely , Rob McKinne y Presiden t Alask aJunea

u Aeronautics , Inc . SeaPor t Airline s Wing s o f Alask a

750 5 N E Airpor

t Way • Portland , O R9721 8 • 888-573-276 7ELD-ME M 5:15-6:1 5

MEM-EL D 6:35-7:3 5 ELD-DAL 7:50-9:0 0 DAL-EL D 9:30-10:4 0 ELD-ME M 10:55-11:5 5 MEM-EL D 19:30-20:3 0 HOT-ME M 5:00-6:0 0 MEM-HO T 8:05-9:0 5 HOT-DA L 9:20-10:3 0 DAL-HO T 11:00-12:1 0 HOT-ME M 12:25-13:2 5 MEM-HO T 19:00-20:0 0
No. 52447.

protest 95506-K (New York).

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entry herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 982). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquidate the entry herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract .45642.
S02Y1359.

#### IN THE MATTER OF LARRY JAMES EATON.

(569 SE2d 522)

Per Curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Respondent Larry James Eaton’s Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License filed pursuant to Bar Rules 4-110 (f) and 4-227 (b) (2). Eaton, who has been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1985, admits that in 2001, he represented an individual and a corporate client in a dispossessory matter; that he abandoned the matter and failed to communicate with the individual client about the status of the case; *490and that by this conduct, he violated Rules 1.3 (a lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; reasonable diligence means that a lawyer shall not without just cause to the detriment of his client in effect wilfully abandon or wilfully disregard a legal matter entrusted to him) and 1.4 (a lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation, shall keep the client reasonably informed about the status of matters and shall promptly comply with reasonable requests for information) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, a part of Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Eaton also admits that he failed to timely answer the Notice of Investigation issued by the Investigative Panel and thereby violated Rule 9.3 (during the investigation of a Bar grievance, the lawyer complained against shall respond to disciplinary authorities in accordance with State Bar Rules). The maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.3 is disbarment while the maximum penalty for a violation of Rules 1.4 and 9.3 is a public reprimand.

Decided September 16, 2002.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W. Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

The State Bar recommends that the Court accept Eaton’s petition and we agree. We note, in mitigation of discipline, Eaton’s cooperative attitude toward these proceedings but also note that the mitigating factor is outweighed by the aggravating factors of Eaton’s substantial experience in the practice of law and his prior disciplinary offenses, including a suspension in 1996, a Review Panel reprimand in 1999, an Investigative Panel reprimand in 2001, and an interim suspension in March 2002. Accordingly, we hereby accept Eaton’s Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License, which is tantamount to disbarment. Eaton is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 61704.

#### The Danwill Company *v.*United States,

protest 308025-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Before the Second Division,

November 13, 1961

No. 66207.

#### Pivar Goodman Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 304477-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pile ribbons made of synthetic textile similar in use to pile ribbons, wholly or in chief value of silk, and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101954 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account
Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated February 19, 2003 of Hartford Life
Insurance Company relating to the financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and of our report dated February 21,
2003 of Hartford Life Insurance Company Separate Account Seven relating to the
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing
in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
Table of Contents 

**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Arcelor Brasil S.A. (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 2004 (the “Report”).

I, José Armando de Figueiredo Campos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ José Armando de Figueiredo Campos José Armando de Figueiredo Campos Chief Executive Officer June 29, 2006 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCMF-12-0000538

IN T HE SUPREME COURT OF T HE ST AT E OF HAW AI # I

In the Matter ofthe F EBRUARY

2021 EX AMINAT ION FOR ADMISSION T O T HE BAR OF T HE ST AT E OF HAW AI # I

NOT ICE OF PASSING T HE HAW AI # I BAR EXAMINAT ION

T he applicants listed below are hereby notif ied that each has passed the
February2021 Haw ai # i ex am ination f or adm ission to the Bar of the State of Haw ai # i, as

req uired by Rule 1.3(g ) (1) of the Rules ofthe Suprem e Court of the State of Haw ai # i
(RSCH):
Joseph Blaise Adam s Kenny Y oung Hy un Baik Laura Stennis Bearden Richard Charles Beckett AubreyMeredith Matsum i Bento Georg ia Garm an Berrenberg Jerem y Dav id Blank W illiam CaseyBow en W illiam Joseph Blaisdell Brennan Katherine Elinor Bruce Maria Criselda Calderon Nicole Chang Hon-Lum Cheung -Cheng Alex ander Edrenkin Ilay da Elm as Ossanna Cleo Brandon Fields Cherim a Christine Gam atero-Manay an Jam es Anthony Gosnell Sierra Ly nn Hag g Rog er de Beaum ont Harg rav e Jessica Christine Hatcher Alec Micah Jacobs MelodyLeilani Kaohu Jason Shaw n Kasam oto Reiko Kato Cam ille T surue Kiy ota KellyAnn LaPrade Greg oryJam es Lau Joshua Jung ho Lee Hsin-Y a Lin Michael Chien-Kung Masato Louis Ian Phillip Luthring er Jef f reyScott Ly ons Em il Anthony Macasinag Janessa Ann Maddox T ori Reiko-Keonaonaokalikolehua Maeshiro Patrick Michael McGuirk Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-12-0000538 22-APR-2021 12:06 PM Dkt. 162 NPHannah Ehrig McKee

Makoto Messersm i th JoAnna Marie Nepom uceno Nardulli Eric M. Nix dorf Christine Eliz abeth Now land Jam es Anthony O'Rourke Melissa Deanna Ow ens Marshall Keoni-Pierce Pautsch Jaim e Antonio Rincon Fransina T upem eleke Sav usa Joseph Kelly Seipel Joseph Alan Seltz er ShayFrances Shibata Kaela Michiko Shiig i Chaz Kenichi Shiz um ura Aris Bourg eois Capule Spring s Cassandra Lea Stam m Elise May um i Sw ain Ian Falef uaf ua T apu Katherine Rae Anna T hom as Oliv ia Perras T hom pson Andres E. T obar Jacob T royT okunag a Rachel Ay am e Uem oto Jose Alf redo Veg a Craig Kent Vernon Lauren Keiko W atanabe Brianna Lee W eav er Brian Philip W ild MatthewPaul W oodw ard Daniel Bry ant W oolston

Each applicant is rem inded that, until he or she has m et all other req uirem ents as

set f orth in RSCH Rule 1.3, and has been adm itted to practice law bythe Suprem e

Court of the State of Haw ai # i, that applicant m aynot eng ag e in the practice of lawin this
jurisdiction.

DAT ED: Honolulu, Haw ai # i, April 22, 2021.

BOARD OF EXAMINERS
By : /s/ Ev ely n M. Rim ando
Its Acting Secretary

2
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 336

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives

and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2000

Mr. LINDER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment

of the Senate.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, May 25, 2000, or Friday, May 26,

4 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res5 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

6 adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 6, 2000, for

7 morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second day

8 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec9 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

10 and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close
2

HCON 336 ATH

1 of business on Thursday, May 25, 2000, Friday, May 26,

2 2000, Saturday, May 27, 2000, or Sunday, May 28, 2000,

3 on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

4 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

5 or adjourned until noon on Monday, June 5, 2000, or

6 Tuesday, June 6, 2000, as may be specified by its Major7 ity Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or ad8 journ, or at such other time on that day as may be speci9 fied by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion,

10 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

11 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res12 olution, whichever occurs first.

13 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

14 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

15 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead16 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

17 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

18 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
Exhibit 12

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

The historical ratio of
earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends for the periods indicated is as follows:



|                                                                          |  |                             |  |                         |  |      |  |      |  |      |  |      |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ----
|                                                                          |  | Three monthsended March 31, |  | Year ended December 31,
|                                                                          |  | 2009                        |  | 2008                    |  | 2008 |  | 2007 |  | 2006 |  | 2005 |  | 2004
|Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |  | 1.21                        |  | 1.93                    |  |     |  | 1.20 |  | 1.26 |  | 1.34 |  | 1.16

For the purpose of calculating the above ratios, earnings represent:



| |  |  | income from continuing operations before adjustment for income or loss from equity investees; plus
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | fixed charges; plus
| | - |  | -------------------



| |  |  | amortization of capitalized expenses related to indebtedness; plus
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | distributed income of equity investees; minus
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | preferred stock dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends represent:



| |  |  | interest expensed; plus
| | - |  | -----------------------



| |  |  | amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness; plus
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | preferred stock dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

The ratios are based solely on historical financial information and no pro forma adjustments have been made thereto. For the year ended December 31, 2008, earning were insufficient to cover combined fixed charges
and preferred stock dividends by $10,382.
Exhibit 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


In connection with this Annual Report of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Rapino, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:June 28, 2019By:/s/ Michael RapinoMichael RapinoPresident and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDAPHIS CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          41,179
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,282
<PP&E>                                          43,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,165
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           789
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,727)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,369
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,374
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,564
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,094)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (524)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,570)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     774
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
No. 53400.

protests 123948-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### American Factors, Ltd. (transferee), et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

James Goldstene 

Executive Officer 

California Air Resource Board 

1001 I Street, P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 958 12 

RE: Completeness Finding for Western Mojave Desert 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan 

&* "5 

Dear Mr& 

On July 22,2008, you submitted a revision to the California State Implementation 

Plan for achieving and maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. 

This revision consists of the Western Mojave Desert 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan. 

We have reviewed this package for completeness and found that it conforms to 

the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 5 1, appendix V. The complete submittal 

includes, among other elements, a reasonable further progress demonstration for the 2008 

milestone year and thereby addresses the finding of failure to submit for this 8-hour 

ozone nonattainment area made by EPA on March 17,2008 (and announced on March 

24,2008 at 73 FR 15416-1 5421). Our completeness finding stops the related clock for 

mandatory sanctions under section 179(a) of the Clean Air Act. 

If you have any questions regarding our review, please call me or have your staff 

contact Lisa Hanf, Chief of the Planning Office, at (415) 972-3854, hanf.lisa@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Director, Air Division 

cc: Mr. Eldon Heaston 

Executive Director 

Mojave Desert AQMD 

14306 Park Avenue 

Victorville, CA 92392 

Mr. Eldon Heaston 

Executive Director 

Antelope Valley AQMD 

43301 Division Street, Suite 206 

Lancaster, CA 93535 

Printed on Recyded Paper