alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

October 13, 1960

No. 64707.

#### Witkowski NY Agency Inc., and J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/11438 and 266767-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of flashgun socket adapters the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Witkowski New York Agency, Inc., et al.*v. *United States (42*Cust. Ct. *84,*C.D. 2069), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended July 31, 2006, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
    /s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenActing Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

January 12, 1950

No. 53893.

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6658-R (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Upon the entire record presented the court was satisfied that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that returned *330upon final appraisement was without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
b 

. 

. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

1 AUSTIN 

BNNM.N 0.MANN 

-- 

Honorable Clyde Barton 

oounty Auditor 

L-f.7 pg' 

, 

mar Sir: 

roqua8tlng the 

ted quutlon ha8 

to ~oney8 a 

aoeouut under Tit1 

artiolea a8 amend0 

8iOn. ht8 1941. 

auume that you 

the lateral road 

Annotated Civil Statuter, 

hlah raid fund &say be exring the fund. Said rtatute 

iOlWl’8 aourt of any aounty to 

hereof in War Saving8 Bond8. 

(0) proYlde8r 

official aapacity or othmtlre, to we any laoneg 

out of the lateral road account for any pUrpO8e 

exoept the purpo8es enumerated in this Aot. If 

Sny COUnty jUdgS Ol’ alQf COUnty UOE4Uli58io~r 8ha11 

Imovingly expend or &se, or vote for the u8e or 

agree t0 expend or ~861 any rum Of money a@OrUiXig 

to any COUnty in thl8 8tate frollr the titel'al 
iionorable Clyde Barton, page 2 

road aoaount8, for any purpo80 not authorized 

by thin Aat, Or 8ha11 knovlngly make 8ny faire 

8t8te5ellt concerning the expenditure of any 

8uch money, he 8h811 be deemed guilty Of a 

felony and upon Conviction rhall be puni8hed 

by aonflnement in the State Penitentiary for 

not 1088 than tvo (2) year8 nor nor0 than five 

(5) T-8.” 

In view of the foregoing rtatute8 Ye relrpeotftily 

anuer the above rtated quertlon in the negative. 

Truatlng that the foregoing fully an8ver8 your lnuulry, ve are 

very truly yOUIAli:db
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 62 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res. 62

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                            Joint Resolution

 
To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change between Georgia 
                           and South Carolina.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSENT OF THE CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The consent of the Congress is given to the 
establishment of the boundary between the States of Georgia and South 
Carolina.
    (b) New Boundary.--The boundary referred to in subsection (a) is 
the boundary--
        (1) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act Number 1044 (S.B. 
    No. 572) approved by the Governor on April 5, 1994, and agreed to 
    by the State of South Carolina in Act Number 375 (S.B. No. 1315) 
    approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996;
        (2) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act Number 1044 (S.B. 
    No. 572) approved by the Governor on April 5, 1994, and agreed to 
    by the State of South Carolina in an Act approved by its Governor 
    not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this 
    joint resolution;
        (3) agreed to by the State of South Carolina in Act Number 375 
    (S.B. No. 1315) approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996, and 
    agreed to by the State of Georgia in an Act approved by its 
    Governor not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of 
    this joint resolution; or
        (4) agreed to by the States of Georgia and South Carolina in 
    Acts approved by each of their Governors not later than 5 years 
    after the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.
    (c) Compact.--The Acts referred to in subsection (b) are recognized 
by the Congress as an interstate compact pursuant to section 10 of 
article I of the United States Constitution.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                       895
<INVENTORY>                                     20,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,281
<PP&E>                                          25,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,838
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,854
<SALES>                                         58,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,202
<CGS>                                           37,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,889
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (684)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 24, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1804

Lower Tribunal No. 18-33486

________________

Maritza Padron, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer Eig, 

Judge.

The Ticktin Law Group, and Kendrick Almaguer (Deerfield Beach), for 

appellants.

Burr & Forman LLP, and Nicholas S. Agnello (Fort Lauderdale), for 

appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
April 19, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DOMINIC SRESHTA, M.D., Appellant

NO. 14-12-00187-CV V.

JACQUELINE JURASEK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF BERNICE TWARDOWSKI, JANICE BURNSIDE, AND JAMES 

TWARDOWSKI, Appellees

____________________

Today the Court heard appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal from the order 

signed by the court below on February 3, 2012. Having considered the motion and found 

it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

DOMINIC SRESHTA, M.D.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF HENDERSON CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC.

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) by Henderson Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (Registrant), the
undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|Date: May 12, 2003
|                  
|
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SERGIO MARTIN CARDENAS, 

 Appellant,

v.

DORA LUZ CARDENAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-11-00070-CV

Appeal from the

383rd Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2008CM210) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to non-suit notice of appeal, which we

construe as a motion to dismiss. The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of appeal are assessed against Appellant. See TEX.R.APP.P.

42.1(d).

June 29, 2011

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
JOHNNY TYSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1272

Opinion filed November 4, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Johnny Tyson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated 

appeal from the September 30, 2015 order denying relief under rule 3.850 in Leon 

County Circuit Court case number 2010-CF-224. Upon issuance of mandate in this 

cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for 

treatment as the notice of appeal. 

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

AMY SUZANNE MULLER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM INACTIVE STATUS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 114 DB 2017 (No. 76 RST 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 210216

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2017, the Report and Recommendation 

of Disciplinary Board Member dated September 13, 2017, is approved and it is 

ORDERED that Amy Suzanne Muller, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE UNAUDITED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED
IN FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                       208
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,958
<PP&E>                                           5,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,449
<SALES>                                         25,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,858
<CGS>                                           21,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  92
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1061

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that ministers

may elect at any time not to be covered by Social Security with respect

to future services as a minister.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1999

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that ministers may elect at any time not to be covered

by Social Security with respect to future services as

a minister.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clergy Freedom of

5 Choice Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1061 IH

1 SEC. 2. MINISTERS MAY ELECT AT ANY TIME NOT TO BE

2 COVERED BY SOCIAL SECURITY WITH RE3 SPECT TO FUTURE SERVICES AS A MINISTER.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 1402 of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to ministers,

6 members of religious orders, and Christian Science practi7 tioners) is amended by adding at the end the following

8 new paragraph:

9 ‘‘(5) TIME FOR FILING APPLICATION, AND EF10 FECTIVE DATE OF EXEMPTION, FOR MINISTERS.—In

11 the case of an individual who is a duly ordained,

12 commissioned, or licensed minister of a church—

13 ‘‘(A) an application pursuant to paragraph

14 (1) with respect to services performed by such

15 individual as a minister may be filed at any

16 time, and

17 ‘‘(B) an exemption received by such an in18 dividual pursuant to this subsection with re19 spect to such services shall be effective for the

20 taxable year during which such application is

21 filed and for all succeeding taxable years.’’

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

23 (1) Paragraph (3) of section 1402(e) of such

24 Code is amended by striking ‘‘An individual’’ and in25 serting ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph (5), an in26 dividual’’.
3

•HR 1061 IH

1 (2) Paragraph (4) of section 1402(e) of such

2 Code is amended by striking ‘‘An exemption’’ and

3 inserting ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph (5), an

4 exemption’’.

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

7 December 31, 1999.

Æ
No. 50288.

#### Protest 56041-K of Childrens Hose, Inc. (New York).

Opinion

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. Si 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protest was sustained to this extent.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Cathy L. Wood, as Chief Financial Officer of
SM&A (the Company) hereby certify that, based on my knowledge: 1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 12, 2005
    
    /s/ CATHY L. WOODCathy L. WoodExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark Jarvis, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: June 30, 2010

| | /s/
      MarkJarvis                  
| | --------------------------------------
| | Mark Jarvis                           
| | President and Chief Executive Officer,
| | Hard Creek Nickel Corporation         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hard Creek
Nickel Corporation and will be retained by Hard Creek Nickel Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          49,518
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     10,011,536
<ALLOWANCE>                                    207,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,450,314
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            766,841
<LONG-TERM>                                  8,394,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          111,550
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           585
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,176,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,450,314
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,021,977
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             479,360
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          472,536
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   82,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                241,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                282,009
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   169,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.4
<LOANS-NON>                                    205,233
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               177,088
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   59,037
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,279
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              207,618
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the  reference  to our firm under the  caption  "Experts"  in
Amendment  No. 1 to the  Registration  Statement  Form S-3, No.  333-105011  and
related Prospectus of Factory 2-U Stores, Inc. for the registration of 2,590,379
shares of its common stock and to the  incorporation by reference therein of our
report dated  February 24, 2003,  with respect to the financial  statements  and
schedule of Factory 2-U Stores,  Inc.  included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended  February 1, 2003,  filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
July 3, 2003