alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

January 3, 2018
Mr. Rickey Washington
861 Nancy Lynn Lane
Arnold, Maryland 21012

Dear Mr. Washington:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after
consultation with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has
approved your request pursuant to section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to
become an institution-affiliated party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Company (‘State Farm”), Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan holding company
(“SLHC”). This approval is limited to your being an institution-affiliated party of State
Farm, including by working for State Farm or an independently owned agency that sells
State Farm insurance products and products for State Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary,
State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington, Illinois. If you seek to work
for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), or for an independently owned
agency that sells products for another SLHC or BHC, you must obtain the Board’s
approval prior to working for such SLHC, BHC, or agency.

This action is based on all the facts of record and the representations made
by you to the Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented
could result in a different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff.
This action is also based on the commitments provided by you in support of your request.
The commitments are conditions imposed in writing in connection with the Board’s
decision and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. This action
is also conditioned specifically on your receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals
related to your proposal and compliance with any terms and conditions that may be
imposed in connection with such approvals. Additionally, if you are convicted of, or
enter into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust,

' 12ULS.C. § 1829.


or money laundering in the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC,
BHC, or independently owned agency that sells products for an SLHC or a BHC,
including any agency that sells State Farm and State Farm Bank products

Sincerely yours,

win l fi—

Ann E. Misback
Secretary of the Board
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PFS PROPERTIES, LLC, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1509 ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 20, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack Day, Judge. Michael P. Fuino of Weidner Law, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Benjamin B. Brown of Quarles & Brady, LLP, Naples, Co-Counsel for Appellee, and Jacqueline F. Kuyk and Michael A.Cohn of Awerbach Cohn, Clearwater, CoCounsel for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


### KELLY, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants as of February 2, 1996, and during the
period covered by the financial statements on which we reported, we hereby
consent to the use of our report dated February 2, 1996, on the financial
statements as of September 30, 1995, and for the year then ended of SuperShuttle
International, Inc. appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of the attached
Registration Statement of SuperShuttle International, Inc. on Form S-1.
 
     We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the headings "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.
 
                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
   June 3, 1998.
No. 52412.

protests 131226-K, etc. (Baltimore, etc.).

#### Men’s Hats, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# L_2023195EN.01005801.xml

| 3.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 195/58

---

Corrigendum to Guideline (EU) 2022/971 of the European Central Bank of 19 May 2022 on the Centralised Securities Database and the production of securities issues statistics and repealing Guideline 2012/689/EU (ECB/2012/21) and Guideline (EU) 2021/834 (ECB/2021/15) (ECB/2022/25)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 166, 22 June 2022
  )

On the second cover page, in the title:

for:

‘
  Guideline (EU) 2022/971 of the European Central Bank of 19 May 2022 on the Centralised Securities Database and the production of securities issues statistics and repealing Guideline 2012/689/EU (ECB/2012/21) and Guideline (EU) 2021/834 (ECB/2021/15) (ECB/2022/25)

  ’,

read:

‘
  Guideline (EU) 2022/971 of the European Central Bank of 19 May 2022 on the Centralised Securities Database and the production of securities issues statistics and repealing Guideline ECB/2012/21 and Guideline (EU) 2021/834 (ECB/2022/25)

  ’.

On page 147, in the title:

for:

‘
  GUIDELINE (EU) 2022/971 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 19 May 2022

on the Centralised Securities Database and the production of securities issues statistics and repealing Guideline 2012/689/EU (ECB/2012/21) and Guideline (EU) 2021/834 (ECB/2021/15) (ECB/2022/25)

  ’,

read:

‘
  GUIDELINE (EU) 2022/971 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 19 May 2022

on the Centralised Securities Database and the production of securities issues statistics and repealing Guideline ECB/2012/21 and Guideline (EU) 2021/834 (ECB/2022/25)

  ’.

---
# ActivePrelimPermits_4.10.2024

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary/quick-tip.pdfhttps://elibrary.ferc.gov/https://www.ferc.gov/elibrary-quick-help
Exhibit 23.3



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS



LOGO



CONSENT OF RALPH E. DAVIS
ASSOCIATES, INC.



As independent petroleum engineers, we
hereby consent to (a) the use of our reserve reports relating to the proved reserves of gas and oil (including coalbed methane) of CNX Gas Corporation (and/or its predecessor(s) in interest) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and (b) the references
to us as experts, in each case, in (x) CNX Gas Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and (y) all of CNX Gas Corporations current and future registration statements filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, including all pre-effective and post-effective amendments thereto including by incorporation by reference, including without limitation, CNX Gas Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file no. 333-131497) and
CNX Gas Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-127483).



We further wish to advise that we are not employed on a contingent basis and that at the time of the preparation of our report, as well as at present, neither Ralph E. Davis associates, Inc. nor any of its employees
had, or now has, a substantial interest in CNX Gas Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, as a holder of its securities, promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer or employee.



RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC./s/ Allen C. BarronAllen C. Barron, P.E.




Date: February 20, 2006



1717 St. James Place, Suite 460    Houston,
Texas 77056    Office 713-622-8955    Fax 713-626-3664    www.ralphedavis.com



Worldwide Energy Consultants Since 1924
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRANDY GREENOUGH,

Appellant,

v.

EBAY, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-1180

February 23, 2024

Appeal from the County Court for Manatee County; Renee L. Inman, 

Judge.

Brandy Greenough, pro se.

Lauren R. Robertson of Holland & Knight, LLP, Tampa; and Jamie 

Billotte Moses of Holland & Knight, LLP, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
No. 53378.

protests 110771-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fine Arts Bag Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*129Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 28, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00018

- CV

THE MAYAN AT SAN MARCOS RIVER, LLC and City of Martindale, Texas

, Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN MARCOS , Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 18

- 0958

- CV

- A Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Pres iding



### ORDER

The panel assigned to hear oral argument in this appeal is familiar with the facts and requests that the parties be prepared to address the application of sections 43.901 and 43.054 and former section 43.028(b) of the Texas Local Government Code to these c ircumstances. In addition to the arguments in the briefs, t he panel is interested in the distinction, if any, between the terms “consent” and “petition” as they are used in those statutes

. The panel further requests that the parties be prepared to discuss these statutes in light of the analysis in C ity of Murphy v. City of Parker

, 932 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 1996) and City of Celina v. City of Pilot Point , No. 02

- 08

- 00230

- CV, 2009 WL 2750978 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Aug. 31, 2009, pet. denied).

Entered on this 28 th day of February , 2020.

PER CU RIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7035

MICHAEL WAYNE CAMDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus A. D. ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-517-7) Submitted: October 7, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Wayne Camden, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Michael Wayne Camden appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Camden v. Robinson , No. CA-99-517-7 (W.D. Va. July 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code I, Michael R. Gorsage, the Chief Executive Officer of Technology Solutions
Company, certify that:  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Technology Solutions
Company. Date: November 12, 2004
    By:
    /s/ MICHAEL R. GORSAGEMichael R. GorsageChief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Technology Solutions Company and will
be retained by Technology Solutions Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 118

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking
2

HJ 118 RDS

1 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘October

2 29, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 28,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 35.1 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE OF**

**ACS EDUCATION SERVICES, INC.**

**GOAL CAPITAL FUNDING TRUST**

The undersigned officerof ACS Education Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) hereby certifies as of December 31, 2005 as follows: 

1. I have reviewed, for the periodbeginning January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2005: (a) the activities of the Servicer as they relate to the Federal FFEL Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005 (the “Issuer Servicing Agreement”) betweenGoal Capital Funding Trust (the “Issuer”) and the Servicer, the Federal FFEL Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005 (the “Depositor Servicing Agreement”) between Goal Capital Funding, LLC (the “Depositor”)and the Servicer and the Custodian Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2005 (the “Custodian Agreement,” and together with the Issuer Servicing Agreement and the Depositor Servicing Agreement, the “Agreements”) among theIssuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, and the Servicer, as custodian, and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the Agreements. The performance by the Servicer of itsobligations under the Agreements has been made by persons under my direct supervision. 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on my review of theServicer’s performance under the Agreements, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements for the period beginning January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2005. 

3. The Servicer has disclosed to the Issuer and the Depositor all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon a report provided by an independent public accountant after conducting a review in compliance with the procedures contemplated by that certain Certificate of ACS Education Services, Inc. dated October 13, 2005.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date: August 13, 2009                                                                               For/s/
Sherri L. McKay-Highers
 Michael R. Cunningham
 Chief Financial Officer
 Principal Financial Officer
Abatement Order f iled January 15, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 18
- 00950
- CV

IN RE SOMAIAH KHOLAIF , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 449677
A B A T E M E N T O R D E R On October 30, 2018, relator, Somaiah Kholaif, filed a petition for w rit of mandamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52 . Relator asked this c ourt to order The Honorable Rory R. Olsen, Judge of Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas, to vacate and set aside his order2

dated October 17, 2018, entered in trial court cause number 449677, styled In re Wajih Arif Safi

. Because the respondent ceased to hold the office of Judge of Probate Court No. 3 of H arris County, Texas, after the institution of this action, we are required to abate this mandamus proceeding to permit the respondent’s successor, the Honorable Jason Cox , to reconsider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b).
T his mandamus proceeding is abated until February 14, 2019 , by which time Judge Cox shall advise this c our t of the action taken on r elator’ s request. This

c ourt will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss this proceeding, as appropriate

. It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 18.1


February
24, 2009


Boardwalk
Pipeline Partners, LP


9
Greenway Plaza, Suite 2800


Houston,
Texas





Dear
Sirs:





We have
audited the consolidated financial statements of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2008, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the
Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated
February 24, 2009, which expresses an unqualified opinion. Note 2 to such
consolidated financial statements contains a description of your change during
the year ended December 31, 2008 in accounting for customer owned gas in
storage. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle
that is preferable under the circumstances.








Yours
truly,





DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP


Houston,
Texas
S02A0673.

#### THE STATE v. BECK.

(572 SE2d 626)

Hines, Justice.

The State appeals from the grant of Beck’s general demurrer challenging the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2). See OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (1). We reverse.

Beck was arrested for driving under the influence of drugs and possession of marijuana. OCGA §§ 40-6-391 (a) (2) and 16-13-2. He filed a general demurrer challenging the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2), arguing that in light of this Court’s decision in *Love v. State,*271 Ga. 398 (3) (517 SE2d 53) (1999), OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2) must be considered unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection. The trial court accepted that argument and granted the demurrer.

The gravamen of Beck’s general demurrer is that the statutory scheme produces disparate treatment between those who are charged with driving under the influence of a drug in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2), whom the State must prove to be “less safe to drive,” and those charged with driving under the influence of a legally-possessed drug in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (b), whom the State must prove have been “rendered incapable of driving safely.” However, in the recent case of *State v. Kachwalla,*274 Ga. 886 (561 SE2d 403) (2002), this Court addressed the same argument grounded in *Love,*supra, and found that “ ‘less safe to drive’ and ‘rendered incapable of driving safely5 set the same standard of impairment necessary to establish that a driver is driving under the influence of alcohol or other intoxicating substance. . . .” *Kachwalla,*supra at 890. Thus, there is no disparity in the treatment of those charged under the two different Code subsections, and here, as in *Kachwalla,*“the trial court erred when it concluded that OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2) violates the equal protection clauses of the U. S. and Georgia constitutions.” Id. See also *State v. Pittmon,*275 Ga. 139 (562 SE2d 185) (2002).

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*689Decided November 12, 2002.

*Gerald N Blaney, Jr, Solicitor-General, Gary S. Vey, Assistant Solicitor-General,*for appellant.

*Clark & Tovone, Wystan B. Getz,*for appellee.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Robert K. Weiler, Chief Executive Officer of Phase
Forward Incorporated (the Company), in connection with the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that  
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and  
    
    the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to
be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be filed for any
purpose whatsoever. By: /s/ Robert K. WeilerRobert K. WeilerChief Executive OfficerPhase Forward IncorporatedDate: August 13, 2004
No. 59398.

protest 248883-K (New York).

#### Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1795

Lower Tribunal No. 20CF000491OS

_____________________________

JAMELL TYRONE COLEMAN,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County.

Mikaela Nix-Walker, Judge.

November 14, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Brett S. Chase, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
EXHIBIT
23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 333-130310,
No. 333-144491,  No.333-152941, and No. 333-161145) of
DealerTrack Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2010 relating
to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Consolidated
Financial Data” in this Form 10-K.





/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




New York,
New York


February 24,
2010
Schedule AProject No. 

**APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION OF SMALL CONDUIT HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES**

**(Filed under 18 CFR §4.92)**

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

�

Conduit Exemption Checklist

Page 1