alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 61

Expressing the sense of the Congress that all Chinese people, including

the people of Taiwan, deserve to be represented in international institutions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that all Chinese people,

including the people of Taiwan, deserve to be represented

in international institutions.

Whereas the people of Taiwan enjoy a free economy with the

19th largest gross domestic product in the world yet that

economy, due to political difficulties, is not represented in

world economic fora;

Whereas the people of Taiwan have the 14th largest trade

economy in the world and the 7th largest amount of foreign investment in the world and hold one of the largest

amounts of foreign exchange reserves in the world;

Whereas the people of Taiwan are committed to the economic

and political norms of the international community;
2

•HCON 61 IH

Whereas the denial of representation to the people of Taiwan

from international institutions weakens the ability of

those institutions to speak for all the people of our world

and is unfair to the people of Taiwan; and

Whereas such representation would not affect the international legal status of the people of Taiwan or of China:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that it

3 should be United States policy to support the representa4 tion of all Chinese people, including the people of Taiwan,

5 in international institutions.

Æ
A89A1791.

#### BOATWRIGHT v. CZEREPINSKI.

(391 SE2d 685)

Beasley, Judge.

Plaintiff Geneva Boatwright appeals from the denial of her motion for new trial after a judgment was entered on a jury verdict in her favor for $7,944.52. She had sued Bret Czerepinski for injuries she sustained when her automobile collided with his at an intersection in May 1987. Despite the jury verdict in her favor she now contends that the damages awarded were inadequate as a matter of law. She also asserts that the trial court erred in failing to grant her motion in limine as to a seat-belt defense and in charging on such subject, and that instructions on comparative negligence were error.

1. First, the last. Although the evidence regarding plaintiffs negligence was slight, it was sufficient to justify a charge on the issue. *Smith v. Lott,*246 Ga. 366, 367 (271 SE2d 463) (1980); *Cale v. Jones,*176 Ga. App. 865, 868 (4) (338 SE2d 68) (1985).

2. Plaintiffs evidence of medical expenses incurred as a result of her injuries was twice what the jury awarded. In addition her proof as to loss of wages was over $600. Whether the damages she recovered *698were inadequate as a matter of law depends upon whether there was negligence on her part to justify a reduction in recovery based upon comparative negligence principles or upon her failure to utilize a seat belt.

Decided March 5, 1990.

C. *Darrell Gossett,*for appellant.

*Dickey, Whelchel, Brown & Readdick, David C. Will, Terry L. Readdick,*for appellee.

The principles applied in *Katz v. White,*190 Ga. App. 458, 459 (379 SE2d 186) (1989), control. It emphasized the necessity of a showing that the injuries received could have been reduced by the use of a seat belt. In this case, a seat belt was available and not used, and plaintiff received injuries to her head and chest from impacting the windshield and steering wheel. As in *Katz,*there was no evidence that using the seat belt would have reduced plaintiff’s injuries. The jury could not infer an element of causation from the fact of nonuse and/ or from the nature of the injuries. Cf. *Cannon v. Lardner,*185 Ga. App. 194 (1) (363 SE2d 574) (1987), writ vacated as to this issue, 258 Ga. 332 (1) (368 SE2d 730) (1988). The requisite evidence being absent, the issue should not have been submitted to the jury. *Katz,*supra;*Sapp v. Johnson,*184 Ga. App. 603, 606 (3) (362 SE2d 82) (1987); *Wendlandt v. Shepherd Constr. Co.,*178 Ga. App. 153, 155 (1) (342 SE2d 352) (1986). See also *F. A. F. Motor Cars v. Childers,*181 Ga. App. 821, 822 (3) (354 SE2d 6) (1987). A new trial is required, even though the jury might have reduced the recovery upon a finding of comparative negligence attributable to plaintiff’s driving.

3. For the reasons set forth in Division 2 a new trial must be had.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 118

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2000

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by strik-
ing the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting
``October 29, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                            CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, President of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR11;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual  compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 30, 2006

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     President
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION





I, Gregory S. Fredrick, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Human Pheromone Sciences, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: November 12, 2007





/s/ Gregory S. Fredrick

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)



22
# ~ CITYOF 

# PRESCOTT City of Prescott Prescott Municipal Airport

a•IZONA

December 11, 2015 6546 Crystal Lane P h one: 928 777-1114

Mr. Byron Huffinan, Acting Director Prescott, AZ 86301 Fax: 928 771-5861

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Mr. Huffman, The City ofPrescott is in receipt of your letter dated November 30, 2015 regarding the policy for use of aviation fuel tax. The City is aware ofthis requirement and the C ity Finance Director notes the funds are already being distributed to the airport. As a result, the City would seem to be in compliance with the current amendment and, therefore , no need for an action plan. If you have any further questions regarding thi s matter, please contact me at (928) 777

- 1204. If you have any questions ofour Finance Department, please contact Mr. Mark Woodfill (928) 777-1222. Sincerely,

City ofPrescott Director of Economic Initiatives
Cc: Craig McConnell, Prescott City Manager Mark Woodfill, City Finance Director John Cox, Airport Manager
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 5 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 5

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of 
   desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
                        penalties for that act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

   Mrs. Emerson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of 
   desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
                        penalties for that act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress and the States shall have power to prohibit the act 
of desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
penalties for that act.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11037 Summary Calendar

TIMOTHY WAYNE CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus POTTER COUNTY SHERIFF, ET AL., Defendants, POTTER COUNTY SHERIFF; JIMMY DON BOYDSTON; SGT. LANCASTER, Defendants-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:93-CV-339

- - - - - - - - - - August 30, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Timothy Wayne Carter, #563581, was given a bench trial in his action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of attack byother inmates. See Farmer v. Brennan , 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1981-82

(1994). The district court found that defendants Boydston and Lancaster were not deliberately indifferent to Carter’s safety needs because he had been placed in a separate cell to protect him from other inmates and because neither Boydston nor Lancaster were responsible for allowing Carter to leave his cell. Rule 52(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides in part: “Findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.” See Anderson v. City of Bessemer City , 470 U.S. 564, 575 (1985). Carter has not shown that the district court was clearly erroneous in its findings.
AFFIRMED.
(Reap. Dec. 10631)

#### Dalminter, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4705, etc.

(Decided December 10, 1963)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement, enumerated in the schedule attached to and made part of the decision herein, involve the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain seamless steel tubing and seamless steel casing.

By stipulation of the parties hereto, it has been agreed as follows:

> ■IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of seamless steel tubing and seamless steel casing, exported from Italy, and that the facts and the law are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *United, States*v. *Dalminter, Inó.,*R. W. Smith, 47 Oust. Ct. 577, A.R.D. 135.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in A.R.D. 135 be incorporated with the record in this case.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices at which such or similar imported merchandise was freely offered for sale for consumption in the United States, packed ready for delivery, in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers, at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, were the prices shown on Schedule A hereto attached less 2 per cent cash discount less 5.9414 per cent for general expenses and 0.8070 per cent for profit less ocean freight and inland freight as invoiced less duty of 7% per cent on casing Grade J-55 or 7% per cent plus 4 per cent on casing Grade N-80 or 12% per cent on tubing Grade J-55 or 12% per cent plus 4 per cent on tubing Grade N-80.

Upon the record before the court and following the cited authority, I find and hold that United States value, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(e)), as *473amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis of value for the seamless steel tubing and seamless steel casing in issue and that said value is represented by the prices shown on schedule A, hereto attached, less 2 per centum cash discount, less 5.9414 per centum for general expenses and 0.8070 per centum for profit, less ocean freight and inland freight, as invoiced, less duty of 7% per centum on casing grade J-55 or 7% per centum, plus 4 per centum on casing grade N-80, or *12y2*per centum on tubing grade J-55 or *12y2*per centum, plus 4 per centum on tubing grade N-80.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00044

- CV
MICHAEL MCKINLEY , Appellant

V.
VICTORIA ESCOCHEA , Appellee Appeal from the 312th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1999

- 51797 ).
This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on September 20, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.
The Court orders that the appellant, Michael McKinley, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below fo r observance.
Judgment rendered March 10 , 2015

. Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3017110-JUL-201202:44 PM
## Department of Environmental Quality
To protect, conserve and enhance the quality of Wyoming's environment for the benefit ofcurrent and future generations. Matthew H. Mead. Governor February 6, 2014

Mr. Shaun McGrath Regional Administrator USEPA Region 8 Mail Code: 8P-AR 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Todd Parfitt, Director

RE: 110 Infrastructure SIP for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Dear Mr. McGrath: Section 110(a)(1) ofthe Clean AirAct (CAA) requires that each state, after a newor revisedNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) is promulgated, reviewtheir State ImplementationPlans (SIPs) to ensure that they meetthe requirements ofthe "infrastructure elements" ofSection 110(a)(2). In response to the new 8-hour ozoneNAAQS that was promulgated onMarch 12, 2008, the State ofWyoming updated the list ofdocumentation required to demonstrate that the SIP meets the requirements ofSections 110(a)(1) and (2) ofthe CAA. The State ofWyoming has made a determination thatthe 8-hour ozoneInfrastructure SIP contains all the necessary provisions to address the requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The 2008 8-hour ozone Infrastructure SIP was taken out for public notice beginning December 16,2013. Apublichearing was held in Cheyenne, Wyoming on January 15,2014, and no comments were received. Ifyou have any questions regarding this submittal or ifyou need further information, please feel free to contract Steven A. Dietrich, Air Quality Administrator, at 307-777-7391. Sincerely,



# \e-v+~- Todd Parfitt Director Department ofEnvironmental Quality Enclosure: 110 Infrastructure SIP Elements for the 2008 8-I-Iour OzoneNAAQS

cc: Steven

### A. Dietrich, AQD Administrator Jeni Cederle, AQD

Herschler Building · 122 West 25th Street · Cheyenne, WY 82002 · http://deq.state.wy.us

**1\DMIN/OUlT~EACH** /\13ANDONED MINES (30'7} 777-7758 (307) 777-6l45 FAX 777-7682 FAX 777-6t162 AIR QUALITY (307) 777-7::!91 FAX 777-5616 INDUSTI-<IAL SITING (;10/) '!T!-7369 FAX 777-5973 LAND QUALITY (307) 777-7156 F /\X 777-5864 SOLID & HAZ. WASTE (]07)

**777-77~12** FAX 777-59'13 WATER QUALITY (307) T77- 778-1 FAX 777-5971
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.07

ENDORSED
STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FILED 08:10 PM 12/20/2000
001642538 - 3333898


                            CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

                                       OF

                          SALEM MEDIA OF NEW YORK, LLC


        I. The name of the limited liability company ("Company") is Salem Media
of New York, LLC.

        II. The address of the Company's registered office in the State of
Delaware is 9 East Loockerman Street, in the City of Dover, County of Kent. The
name of its registered agent at such address is National Registered Agents, Inc.

        III. This Certificate of Formation shall be effective immediately upon
filing.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Formation of Salem Media of New York, LLC this 19th day of December, 2000.

                                       SALEM MEDIA CORPORATION,
                                       a New York corporation

                                       By: /s/ Jonathan L. Block
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jonathan L. Block, Vice President
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the SalesLogix Corporation 1996 Equity
Incentive Plan, SalesLogix Corporation 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan and SalesLogix Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report
dated January 22, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of Opis
Corporation included in Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement (Form S-1)
and in the related Prospectus of SalesLogix Corporation filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Phoenix, Arizona
June 18, 1999