alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey Staszak, Chief Executive
      Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
      that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, to
      which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic Report"),
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and




2. The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
      covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for
      the
      period covered by the Periodic Report.





In
      Witness Whereof ,
      the
      undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 4th day of August,
      2005.




**Volterra
                  Semiconductor
                  Corporation**Date:
                  August 4, 2005
              By:
              /s/
                  Jeffrey StaszakJeffrey
                  Staszak
                Chief
                  Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation under the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective
      of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**eTariff Filing Codes for Electric Market-Based Rate Filings**

Companies which include a tariff as part of their filing at the Commission are required to submit that filing through the eTariff system.  

This system requires that companies chose a program (M or E) under which they will be categorized and also allows for filings to be made under a number of different codes depending on the type of filing being made.

In the market-based rate program companies can choose program M or E based on the following criteria.  

· M: Companies that will only have an electric market-based rate tariff on file.

· E:  Companies that have at least one tariff on file that is ***not*** a market-based rate tariff. 

Companies must also file using the right type of filing code for their program.  

**MBR Filing CodesAmendment Codes**
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 108

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage

penalty in the standard deduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. KNOLLENBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the marriage penalty in the standard deduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marriage Penalty Re5 lief Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN STAND7 ARD DEDUCTION.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 63(c) of

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard

10 deduction) is amended—
2

•HR 108 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ in subparagraph (A)

2 and inserting ‘‘twice the dollar amount in effect

3 under subparagraph (C) for the taxable year’’;

4 (2) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

5 (B);

6 (3) by striking ‘‘in the case of’’ and all that fol7 lows in subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘in any

8 other case.’’; and

9 (4) by striking subparagraph (D).

10 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—

11 (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 1(f)(6) of such

12 Code is amended by striking ‘‘(other than with’’ and

13 all that follows through ‘‘shall be applied’’ and in14 serting ‘‘(other than with respect to sections

15 63(c)(4) and 151(d)(4)(A)) shall be applied’’.

16 (2) Paragraph (4) of section 63(c) of such Code

17 is amended by adding at the end the following flush

18 sentence:

19 ‘‘The preceding sentence shall not apply to the

20 amount referred to in paragraph (2)(A).’’.

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

22 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

23 December 31, 1998.

Æ
No. 52123.

protests 98854-K, etc. (New York).

#### Allied Purchasing Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 55779.

protest 161578-K (Los Angeles).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 51257.

#### Protests 959486-G, etc., of Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      June 27, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Xu KechengName:
              Xu
      KechengTitle:
              President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive
  Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be
retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  BigString  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2006 (the  "Report"),
I, Robert  DeMeulemeester,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  do hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

Dated:  March 29, 2007                        /s/ Robert DeMeulemeester
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert DeMeulemeester
                                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peoples Financial Corp. Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, R.B. Robertson, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.




                                             /s/R.B. Robertson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             R.B. Robertson
                                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 9, 2002
(Reap. Dec. 11087)

#### Albers Supply Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 739913.

(Decided October 19, 1965)

*Sharp, Solter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published m 89 T.D. 197, and TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

*630Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule, As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 65351.

#### The Brabant Needle Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/11574 (New York).

Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of needle wrappers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 63395, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. J. Res. 46

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Joint Resolution

Conferring status as an honorary veteran of the United States Armed Forces on

Zachary Fisher.

Whereas the United States has only once before conferred on an

individual status as an honorary veteran of the United States

Armed Forces, when in Public Law 105–67 Congress conferred

that status on Leslie Townes (Bob) Hope;

Whereas status as an honorary veteran of the United States Armed

Forces is and should remain an extraordinary honor not lightly

conferred nor frequently granted;

Whereas the lifetime of accomplishments and generosity of Zachary

Fisher on behalf of United States military servicemembers, veterans, and their families through a wide range of philanthropic

activities fully justifies the conferring of such status;

Whereas Zachary Fisher is himself not a veteran, having attempted

to enlist in the Armed Forces to serve his country during World

War II, but being informed that he was ineligible due to a

preexisting medical condition;

Whereas Zachary Fisher and his wife Elizabeth have as private

citizens enhanced the lives of thousands of servicemembers, veterans, and their families through a wide range of philanthropic

activities;

Whereas Zachary Fisher has been honored by each of the branches

of the Armed Forces, by the Departments of Defense and Veterans

Affairs, and by the major veterans service organizations for

projects such as the preservation of the USS INTREPID as a

sea-air-space museum in New York harbor, the establishment

of the Fisher House program for relatives of critically ill members

of the Armed Forces and their families, and the furnishing of

scholarships and other financial support to families who have

lost a loved one in service to their country; and

Whereas Zachary Fisher has been awarded the Presidential Medal

of Freedom in recognition of his extraordinary patriotism and

philanthropy: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress—

(1) extends its gratitude, on behalf of the American people,

to Zachary Fisher for his lifetime of accomplishments and

philanthropy on behalf of United States military

servicemembers; and
H. J. Res. 46—2

(2) confers upon Zachary Fisher the status of an honorary

veteran of the United States Armed Forces.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
HL
State Land No. <2006>0216




Land
      Use Right Holder:
              
              Heilongjiang
      Lanxi Sunrise Linen Textile IndustryCo.
      LtdLocation:
              
              Fourth
      Neighborhood, East Town Street, LanxiLand
      No.:
              
              East
      Town 256-3Map
      No.:
              
              L-52-61-(13)Land
      Type (Purpose of Use:
              
              Industrial
      landPrice
      Acquired:Land
      Use Right Type:
              
              TransferTermination
      Date:
              
              August
      15, 2056Area
      under the Use Right:
              
              44134m2Area
      of Sole Use:
              
              _____
      m2Area
      Shared:
              
              _____
      m2





Pursuant to the legal provisions of the
“People's Republic of China Constitution,” “People's Republic of China Land
Management Law” and “People's Republic of China Urban Real Estate Property
Management Law,” the land use right of which the holder is applying for
registration has been reviewed and verified and this certificate is hereby
issued in order to protect the legitimate interests of the land use right
holder.





Lanxi
County People’s Government (seal)


(imprint of Lanxi County People’s
Government Land Registration Special Seal)





September
5, 2006










(Copy of
the description of the land in question attached)





Agency of
Registration:            Lanxi
County State Land Resources Bureau


September
5, 2006





Certificate
Issuing Authority:   People's Republic of China Ministry of Land
and


Resources  (Land
Certificate Management Special Seal)


No.
00019990
March 24, 2015

Mr. Robert Biggs

601 East Pinto Court

Gilbert, AZ 85296

Dear Mr. Biggs:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 17, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0472), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 428 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 428

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Providing for corrections in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 5164) 
 amending title 49, United States Code, to require reports concerning 
defects in motor vehicles or tires or other motor vehicle equipment in 
               foreign countries, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 428

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill, H.R. 5164, entitled ``An Act to 
amend title 49, United States Code, to require reports concerning 
defects in motor vehicles or tires or other motor vehicle equipment in 
foreign countries, and for other purposes'', the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections in section 6:
            (1) insert before ``Section 30120(c)'' the following: ``(a) 
        Remedy Program.--''; and
            (2) insert at the end of section 6 the following:
    ``(b) Reimbursement Prior to Recall.--Section 30120(d) of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end thereof the 
following: ``A manufacturer's remedy program shall include a plan for 
reimbursing an owner or purchaser who incurred the cost of the remedy 
within a reasonable time in advance of the manufacturer's notification 
under subsection (b) or (c) of section 30118. The Secretary may 
prescribe regulations establishing what constitutes a reasonable time 
for purposes of the preceding sentence and other reasonable conditions 
for the reimbursement plan.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7580

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee.

v.

MARK EDWARD COULTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:12-cr-00603-JKB-1; 1:17-cv-01672-JKB)

Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Amended: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Edward Coulter, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark Edward Coulter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Coulter has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 28 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 28

Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Regula) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. of the 
District of Columbia on April 11, 1999, is filled by the reappointment 
of the incumbent for a term of six years, effective April 12, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
November 26 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

REGINALD KEITH BANK S , Appellant
NO. 14

- 13

- 00971

- CR NO. 14

- 13

- 00972

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The C ourt orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.