alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory S. Fredrick, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of Human
Pheromone Sciences, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: May 11, 2004

/s/ GREGORY S. FREDRICK
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer


                                       15
EXHIBIT
      99.1

















**Report
      of Independent Accountants**









To
      the
      Board of Directors and


Shareholder
      of Equity One, Inc.:









We
      have
      examined management’s assertion about Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries’
(the “Company”) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
      the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s Uniform Single Attestation Program
      for Mortgage Bankers (“USAP”) as of and for the year ended November 30, 2005
      included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management
      is
      responsible for the Company’s compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
      Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the
      Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
      the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
      examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the
      minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
      considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
      provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
      a
      legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended November
      30, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





February
      27, 2006






















**Management’s
      Assertion Concerning Compliance**


**with
      USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**









February
      22, 2006









As
      of and
      for the year ended November 30, 2005, Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries
      (the “Company”),
      a wholly-owned subsidiary of Popular Financial Holdings, Inc., have complied
      in all
      material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage
      Bankers Association
      of America’s *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (“USAP”) solely
      for purpose of servicing the residential mortgage loans underlying the Loan
      Asset Backed Certificate
      Series 1997-1, 1998-1, 1999-1, 2000-1, 2001-1, 2001-2, 2001-3, 2002-1, 2002-2, 2002-3,
      2002-4, 2002-5, 2003-1, 2003-2, 2003-3, 2003-4, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2004-3, 2004-4,
      2004-- 5,
      2005-1, 2005-2, 2005-A, 2005-3, 2005-B, 2005-4, 2005-C, 2005-5, 2005-D (the “Agreement”)
      except as noted as
      follows:




As
      of and
      for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and errors and
      omissions policies
      in the amounts of $65,000,000 and $25,000,000, respectively.




/s/ John
                N.
                MartellaJohn
                  N. Martella
                Group
                  Executive Vice President of Loan Servicing
Document

Exhibit 10.37

David M. Cordani
President and CEO

Routing  W2SLT


900 Cottage Grove Road
Hartford, CT 06152
Telephone  860.226.7482
Facsimile  860.226.3099


December 6, 2020




Brian Evanko    


Dear Brian:


I am pleased to offer the following compensation package in connection with your assumption of the role of EVP & Chief Financial Officer, reporting to me, effective January 1, 2021, subject to your written acceptance below: 


•Base Salary – will increase to a pre-tax annualized rate of $800,000.  


•Annual Incentive – your annual target will increase to $900,000 for the 2021 performance year.  


•Long-Term Incentive – your annual long-term incentive target will increase to $2,800,000 for the 2021 annual grant.




NEW TOTAL ANNUAL COMPENSATION OPPORTUNITY:            $4,500,000
    
 The changes above have no impact on previously awarded bonuses, stock options, or SPS grants.  As an executive of the company, your compensation will be subject to any future program changes.


Brian, I look forward to continuing to partner with you.


Sincerely,




/s/ David M. Cordani


David M. Cordani


cc:    K. Gorodetzer
       J. Murabito


Please indicate your acceptance of our offer by signing below and returning a copy to me no later than Tuesday, December 8, 2020.


Acceptance:    /s/ Brian Evanko


Date:        December 8, 2020
No. 51490.

#### Protests 27515-K/89141, etc., of Joseph Antognoli & Co., et al. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramellt*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2022027EN.01001601.xml

| 19.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 December 2021

appointing the alternate to the Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office

(2022/C 27/06)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights (1), and in particular Article 47(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision of 16 June 2016 (2), the Council renewed the term of office of Ms Sari Kaarina HAUKKA as alternate to the Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ’Office’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision of 16 June 2016 (2), the Council renewed the term of office of Ms Sari Kaarina HAUKKA as alternate to the Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ’Office’).

| (2) | The renewed term of office of Ms Sari Kaarina HAUKKA expired on 14 October 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The renewed term of office of Ms Sari Kaarina HAUKKA expired on 14 October 2021.

| (3) | On 13 October 2021, after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office, the Commission proposed to the Council a list of candidates for the alternates to the Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Office, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 13 October 2021, after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office, the Commission proposed to the Council a list of candidates for the alternates to the Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   Mr Marcus NAVIN-JONES is hereby appointed as alternate to the Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ’Office’) for a period of five years.

2.   The term of office of Mr Marcus NAVIN-JONES shall run from the date on which he takes up his duties. That date shall be agreed between the President and the Administrative Council of the Office.

Article 2

The Chairperson of the Administrative Council of the Office shall be empowered to provide for all the arrangements necessary to implement Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. VIZJAK

---

(1)  OJ L 227, 1.9.1994, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 16 June 2016 renewing the term of office of the alternate to the Chairperson of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ C 223, 21.6.2016, p. 5).

2

---
Exhibit 99.1


                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Hugh R.
Frater, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard M. Shea, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Hugh R. Frater
_________________________________
Name:  Hugh R. Frater
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 15, 2003

/s/ Richard M. Shea
________________________________
Name:  Richard M. Shea
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 15, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this certification required by ss. 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.2 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE OF**

**GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.**

**GOAL CAPITAL FUNDING TRUST**

The undersigned officerof Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) hereby certifies as of December 31, 2005 as follows: 

1. I have reviewed,for the period beginning January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2005: (a) the activities of the Servicer as they relate to the Student Loan Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005 (the “Issuer ServicingAgreement”) between the Servicer and Goal Capital Funding Trust (the “Issuer”), the Student Loan Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005 (the “Depositor Servicing Agreement”) between the Servicer and GoalCapital Funding, LLC (the “Depositor”) and the Custodian Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005 (the “Custodian Agreement” and together with the Servicing Agreement and the Origination and Servicing Agreement, the“Agreements “) among the Issuer, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, and the Servicer, as custodian, and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the Agreements. Theperformance by the Servicer of its obligations under the Agreements has been made by persons under my direct supervision. 

2. To the best of my knowledge,based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the Agreements, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements for the period beginning January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2005. 

3. The Servicer has disclosed to the Issuer and the Depositor all significant deficiencies known to it relating to the Servicer’s compliance with the minimumservicing standards required by the Servicing Agreements as reported in accordance with the procedures contemplated by that certain General Certificate of Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. dated October 13, 2005.
Health: 1

- 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, XB Testing (Testing desired)

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 2 ppb), XB Testing ( Testing desired)EXPOSURE

- BASED REVIEW: Yes (0 criteria met)

1) # of workers exposed: 7 >1000? No

2) >100 workers with >10 mg/ day inhalation exposure: No

3) (a) >100 workers w/1

- 10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: No

(b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr: No
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Endeavor Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                                                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ Jonathan J. Ledecky                                                         
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Jonathan J. Ledecky                                                             
|                     |  | Title: |  | President and Secretary (Principal Executive
Officer)                           
|                     |  |       
|Date: March 15, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ Eric J. Watson                                                              
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Eric J. Watson                                                                  
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chairman of the Board and Treasurer (Principal
Accounting and Financial Officer)
No. 58403.

protest 200122-K (New York).

#### Omni Products Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinylon fiber and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that in Abstract 57886, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 54512.

#### Saji Trading Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 120216-K and 124931-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 56912.

#### F. Strauss & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 179441-K/14049 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the customs inspector testified that the case he reported as short was not received with the shipment. Plaintiff’s second witness also testified that a case was short when the shipment was received, but that one case was shipped later and that duty and internal revenue taxes were again paid thereon. In view of the evidence presented and following *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon the case shown to have been short-landed. The protest was sustained to this extent.
June 2, 2011

Mr. Boris Popov

Director Ballistic Recovery Systems 380 Airport Road South Saint Paul, MN 55075-3551

Dear Mr. Popov:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from §§ 43.13(a) and 43.16 of Title 14, Code of Federal Re gulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request:

We entered your April 29, 2011, exemption request on behalf of Ballistic Recovery Systems into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0492), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do:

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Don’t Hear From You:

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
<PAGE>   1
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.3
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated March 15, 1999, except for Note 10, as to which the
date is March 24, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of Enact
Incorporated included in the Registration Statement (Form S-1) and in the
related Prospectus of SalesLogix Corporation for the registration of shares of
its common stock.
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Columbus, Ohio
March 25, 1999
# Official Journal L 94/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 94 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 623 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 94

English edition

Legislation

Volume 623 April 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/542 of 2 April 2019 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘ស្ករត្នោតកំពង់ស្ពឺ’ (Skor Thnot Kampong Speu) (PGI)) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/542 of 2 April 2019 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘ស្ករត្នោតកំពង់ស្ពឺ’ (Skor Thnot Kampong Speu) (PGI))

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1922 of 10 October 2018 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items ( OJ L 319, 14.12.2018 ) | 3 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1922 of 10 October 2018 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items ( OJ L 319, 14.12.2018 )

( OJ L 319, 14.12.2018 )

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 58420.

protests 210753-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Keepnews Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures or figurines similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); (2) the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on and after May 28, 1950, at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. *D.*52476), except such items as were imported from the Soviet Zone of Germany and entered, of withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after the close of business on August 31, 1951; and (3) the items imported from the Soviet Zone of Germany and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after the close of business on August 31, 1951, at 20 percent under said paragraph, in view of Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52788).