alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Christopher A. Milner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard M.
Shea, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christopher A. Milner
--------------------------------
Name: Christopher A. Milner
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:   May 10, 2004

/s/ Richard M. Shea
--------------------------------
Name: Richard M. Shea
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   May 10, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this certification required by ss. 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) (2)

(2005/C 262/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

GREECE

Operating licences granted

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

Operating licences revoked

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

Change of name of license holder

Category A:   Operating licences without the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

----

(1)OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

----
In-Person Attendees: Test Procedures for Microwave Ovens (Active Mode)

Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Armstrong, Ashley General Engineer U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585-0121 202-586-6590 202-586-4617 Ash

Battaglia, James Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street

Suite 400

Burlington MA 01803-5154 781-270-8321 781-270-0418 jame

Brookman, Douglas Facilitator Public Solutions, Inc. 108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228 410-719-0580 410-719-0581 publCase, David Trial Attorney General Counsel 1000 Independence 

Avenue, S.W.

Washington DC 20585 202-287-6998 N/A davi

Cleary, Jennifer Director, Regulatory Affairs Association of Home Appliance 

Manufacturers (AHAM)

1111 19th Street, NW,Suite 402

Washington DC 20036 202-872-5955 

x314

202-872-9354 jclea

Cymbalsky, John Supervisory Operations 

Research Analyst

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-1692 202-586-4617 john

Edwards, Brenda J. Program Support 

Specialist

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-596-2945 202-586-4617 bren

Leybourn, Stephen B. Regulatory/Product 

Engineer

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM)

1111 19th Street NW, Suite 402

Washington DC 20036 202-872-5955 

x 331

202-872-9354 sleyb

Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW,Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4034 N/A jmau

Reich, Judith Project Employee / 

Consultant

Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street

Suite 400

Burlington MA 01803 781-270-8313 781-270-0418 jreic

Reis, Callie Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street, Suite 

400

Burlington MA 01803 781-270-8326 N/A callie

Sharp, Mark J. Group Manager

Corporate Environmental Department

Panasonic Corporation of North America

1130 Connecticut Avenue, NW,Suite 1100

Washington DC 20036 202-912-3800 

x 116

202-912-3810 mark

Stas, Eric A. Attorney-Advisor

(General)

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, S.W.

Washington DC 20585 202-586-5827 202-586-4116 eric.

Yamauchi, Masa (Masato)

Manager of Microwave Technical Lab.

Panasonic Corporation 5201 Tollview Dr, E2J-16 Rolling 

Meadows

IL 60008 847-637-4672 847-637-4677 mas
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 76

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first session of the One Hundred

Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or jointresolution making general appropriations or continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2000.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 76

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder

of the first session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress

with respect to any bill or joint resolution making general

appropriations or continuing appropriations for fiscal

year 2000.
2

•HJ 76 EH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the provisions of sections 106 and 107 of title 1,

4 United States Code, are waived for the remainder of the

5 first session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with re6 spect to the printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the

7 enrollment of any bill or joint resolution making general

8 appropriations or continuing appropriations for the fiscal

9 year ending September 30, 2000. The enrollment of any

10 such bill or joint resolution shall be in such form as the

11 Committee on House Administration of the House of Rep12 resentatives certifies to be a true enrollment.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. J. Res. 116

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘October 27, 2000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 56900.

#### D. Stanley Corcoran, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 173714-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of china figures similar in all material respects to the figures passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68589.

protest 63/2741 (New York).

#### Shriro Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of various types of meters similar in all material respects *362to those the subject of *United States*v. G. *L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with this Annual Report of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kathy Willard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 28, 2011



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Kathy Willard      
|    |  | Kathy Willard          
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 56248.

protests 69097-K and 72712-K (San Francisco).

#### The Attorney General as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98805; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-067]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule Related to 
Physical Port Fees

October 27, 2023.
    On September 1, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
amend certain connectivity and port fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on September 20, 2023.\4\ On September 29, 2023, pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\5\ the Commission: (1) temporarily suspended 
the proposed rule change; and (2) instituted proceedings under Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On October 25, 2023, the 
Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CboeBZX-2023-067).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98395 (September 14, 
2023), 88 FR 64950.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98646, 88 FR 68830 
(October 4, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24170 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
No. 60366.

protests 282784-K, etc. (New York).

#### Intercontinental Trading Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of typewriter cases the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59651, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 54500.

#### Kenneth Kittleson *v.*United States,

protest 139051-K (Tampa).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
----

|   | /s/ Hollis M. Greenlaw                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Hollis M. Greenlaw                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of the Registrant, and President and Chief Executive Officer of UMT Services, Inc., sole general partner of UMTH Land Development, L.P. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | /s/ Cara D. Obert                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | Cara D. Obert                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of the Registrant                                                                                                                                     |

----
No. 52830.

#### R. P. Oldham Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 135126-K, etc. (San Diego, etc.).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 134

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 14, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275 is further amended by striking

4 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘Decem5 ber 16, 2000’’.

Æ
H. R. 1104

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative jurisdiction

over land within the boundaries of the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National

Historic Site to the Archivist of the United States for the construction of a

visitor center.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VISITOR CENTER FOR HOME OF FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT

NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, HYDE PARK, NEW YORK.

(a) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION.—The Secretary of the Interior may transfer to the Archivist of the United

States administrative jurisdiction over land located in the Home

of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site, for use by the

Archivist for the construction of a visitor center facility to jointly

serve the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site

and the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library, located in Hyde

Park, New York.

(b) CONDITIONS OF TRANSFER.—

(1) PROTECTION OF HISTORIC SITE.—The transfer authorized

in subsection (a) shall be subject to an agreement between

the Secretary and the Archivist that shall include such provisions for the protection of the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt

National Historic Site and the joint use of the facility to be

constructed as the Secretary and the Archivist may consider

necessary.

(2) CONSIDERATION.—A transfer made pursuant to subsection (a) shall be made without consideration or reimbursement.

(3) TERMINATION.—If use by the Archivist of the land

referred to in subsection (a) is terminated by the Archivist

at any time, administrative jurisdiction over the land shall

automatically revert to the Department of the Interior.

(c) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in subsection

(a) shall consist of not more than 1 acre of land as may be mutually
H. R. 1104—2

agreed to by the Secretary and the Archivist and more particularly

described in the agreement required under subsection (b)(1).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Before the Second Division,

May 27, 1964

No. 68588.

protest 63/947 (Boston).

#### American Pecco Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of form supports similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Universal Builders Supply Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2319), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51879.

#### American Express Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 128333-K/947, etc. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
138 FERC ¶ 61,122 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 

Locational Exchanges of Wholesale Electric Power Docket No. RM11-9-000 

NOTICE TERMINATING PROCEEDING 

(February 16, 2012) 

1. On February 17, 2011, the Commission issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) 

concerning the regulatory treatment of locational exchanges of wholesale electric power. 

The Commission sought guidance as to the circumstances under which locational 

exchanges of wholesale electric power should be permitted generically and circumstances 

under which the Commission should consider locational exchanges of wholesale electric 

power on a case-by-case basis. The Commission received 17 comments from interested 

parties addressing various issues presented in the NOI. The Commission has determined 

that there is no basis for continuing this proceeding through the initiation of a rulemaking 

process and, instead, addresses related issues in an order issued contemporaneously with 

this order.1

 Therefore, the Commission is terminating this proceeding. 

The Commission orders: 

 The Notice of Inquiry issued by the Commission in this proceeding is hereby 

terminated. 

By direction of the Commission. 

( S E A L ) 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

 1

 138 FERC ¶ 61,121 (2012).
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-094
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Case No. 8,928.

#### MACUBBIN v. LOVELL.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 184.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1804.

Evidence — Comparison op Handwriting.

Comparison of handwriting is not evidence.

Mr. Peacock, for plaintiff,

having proved that on a note filed in another case the plaintiff had confessed judgment, prayed the court to suffer the jury to compare a receipt purporting to be signed by the plaintiff with the said note and from thence to infer that the signature was in his handwriting.

Refused.

KILTY, Chief Judge, absent.

See Peake, Ev. 68-70, s. p. Watterstone v. Cook [unreported], at the same term.