alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of Global Services Partners Acquisition Corp.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2006 (the
‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Avinash Vashistha, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
      President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      October 30, 2006






By:  /s/
      Avinash Vashistha 
 Avinash
        Vashistha Chief
        Financial Officer and Executive Vice President (Principal
        Accounting and Financial Officer)
No. 51243.

#### Protest 107379-K of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliveb, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of lighter parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 301, C. D. 70) and Abstract 41307. In accordance therewith it was held that the lighter parts (the lighters of which they are parts being valued above $5 per dozen pieces) are properly dutiable at *%*cent each and *%*cent per dozen for each 1 cent the value exceeds 20 cents per dozen and 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1527 (c) (2) as modified by T. D. 48316.
No. 51824.

#### Stern & Stern Textile Importers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 32102-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
DENY and Opinion Filed December 28, 2021 

# S

In the 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-01155-CV IN RE WWLC INVESTMENT, LP F/ K/A WLC INVESTMENT, LP, Relator Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416-04856-2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle Relator’s December 28, 2021 petition fo r writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief challenge th e portion of the trial court’s December 10, 2021 order requiring relator to pay $5, 000 in sanctions to a non-part y. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no ade quate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). As the party seeking relief, relator has the burden of providing the Court with a properly authenticated mandamus record es tablishing the right to mandamus relief.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a); In re Butler , 270 S.W.3d 757, 759 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding) (requiring rela tor to submit certified or sworn record).–2– Further, “[a] court cannot grant mandamus relief unless the error was raised in the trial court.” In re Rowes , No. 05-14-00606-CV, 2014 WL 2452723, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 30, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Based on the record before us, we conclude rela tor has not shown its entitlement to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny the petition for wr it of mandamus, and deny the motion for emergency relief as moot.

211155F.P05 /Co r y L. Carl y le/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**











Certification
      by the Co-Presidents


of


Boardwalk
      GP, LLC


pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as
      adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Co-Presidents of Boardwalk GP, LLC
      hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge, that the annual report on Form 10-K
      for the year ended December 31, 2005, (the "Report") of Boardwalk Pipeline
      Partners, LP (the “Partnership”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Income of the
      Partnership.











March
      16,
      2006




*/s/
      Rolf A. Gafvert*


Rolf
      A.
      Gafvert


Co-President
      and Director


(co-principal
      executive officer)







*/s/
      H. Dean Jones II*


H.
      Dean
      Jones II


Co-President
      and Director


(co-principal
      executive officer)
No. 50304.

#### Protests 798073-G, etc., of Bingham & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brandon Truaxe, of Euoko Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Euoko
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2008



/s/ Brandon Truaxe Brandon Truaxe President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

s1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147481

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147481

COA: 315981

Ottawa CC: 12

- 036817

- FH

JUSTIN MARK McKINZIE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Before the First Division,

November 16, 1959

No. 63519.

protests 325827-K, etc. (New York).

#### Walter Hatches, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co., of N.Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*408Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with" stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlestick holders, composed of iron, not plated with gold lacquer, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the merchandise was held dutiable, as claimed, at the applicable rates in effect on the respective dates of importation under the pertinent trade agreements.
No. 52143.

protests 546275-G, etc. (New York).

#### Arthur H. Lee & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. P68/51.

protests 61/23098, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Ohio Radio Mfg. Co. and Harper, Robinson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of meters or ammeters or multitesters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G.L.*Electronics, *Inc., Arrow*Sales, *Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Shaun
Passley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of EPAZZ,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of EPAZZ,
Inc.





Dated:
April 10, 2008





By:         /s/
Shaun Passley


Shaun
Passley


Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit  23.01


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Excalibur  Technologies  Corporation  and  Subsidiaries  on Form S-8  (File  No.
333-52794)  and Form S-4 (File No.  333-50172) of our report dated March 8, 2000
related  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  financial  statement
schedule which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                        /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


McLean, Virginia
May 1, 2001




<PAGE>



                                                                 Exhibit 23.02

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333- 52794) and Form S-4 (No.  333-50172)  pertaining to the 2000
Stock Option Plan, the Employee  Stock Purchase Plan and the related  Prospectus
of Convera  Corporation (a Delaware  corporation),  of our report dated March 2,
2001,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated   financial  statements  of  Convera
Corporation  included  in this  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K) for the year  ended
January 31, 2001.

                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


McLean, Virginia
May 1, 2001
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1059

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

to extend the pay-as-you-go requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1999

Mr. MINGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Budget

A BILL

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to extend the pay-as-you-go requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Downpayment on the

5 Debt Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO

7 REQUIREMENT.

8 (a) EXTENSION.—(1) Section 252 of the Balanced

9 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is
2

•HR 1059 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘enacted before October 1, 2002,’’

2 both places it appears.

3 (2) The last sentence of section 275(b) of the Bal4 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

5 is amended by striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2009’’.

6 (b) MODIFICATION.—(1) Section 250(c) of the Bal7 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

8 is amended by adding at the end the following new para9 graph:

10 ‘‘(20) The term ‘BUDGET INCREASE’ means, for

11 purposes of section 252, an increase in direct spend12 ing outlays or a decrease in receipts relative to the

13 baseline, and the term ‘BUDGET DECREASE’ means,

14 for purposes of section 252, a decrease in direct

15 spending outlays or an increase in receipts relative

16 to the baseline.’’.

17 (2) Section 252(a) of the Balanced Budget and

18 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by

19 striking ‘‘increases the deficit’’ and inserting ‘‘results in

20 a net budget increase’’.

21 (3) Section 252(b)(1) of the Balanced Budget and

22 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended—

23 (A) in its side heading by inserting ‘‘AND

24 AMOUNT’’ after ‘‘TIMING’’; and
3

•HR 1059 IH

1 (B) by striking ‘‘net deficit increase’’ and in2 serting ‘‘net budget increase’’.

3 (4) Section 252(b)(2) of the Balanced Budget and

4 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended—

5 (A) in its side heading by striking ‘‘DEFICIT IN6 CREASE’’ and inserting ‘‘NET BUDGET INCREASE’’;

7 and

8 (B) by striking ‘‘deficit increase or decrease’’

9 the first place it appears and inserting ‘‘any net

10 budget increase’’; and

11 (C) by striking ‘‘any net deficit increase or de12 crease in the current year resulting from’’.

13 (5) The side heading of section 252(c) of the Bal14 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

15 is amended by striking ‘‘DEFICIT INCREASE’’ and insert16 ing ‘‘NET BUDGET INCREASE’’.

Æ
QCB Change in Control Agreement Renewal and Extension - Hank H. Kadowaki



 Exhibit 10.15.6 
  
 Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Hank H. Kadowaki dated July 1, 2003.

  
 QUAKER CITY BANK 
 CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT 
 RENEWAL AND EXTENSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 
  
 Name of Participant:    Hank H.
Kadowaki 
  
 The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at
their regularly scheduled meeting on June 19, 2003, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement with the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until
June 30, 2005. 
  
 Dated this
            1st             day of
            July            , A.D.,
            2003            . 
  

	 	 	       QUAKER CITY BANK

			
	             /s/    HANK H.
KADOWAKI

	 	 By:
	 	             /s/    FREDERIC R. MCGILL


	Participant	 	 	 	President
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate: March 30, 2010
No. 61711.

#### Joseph C. Murray & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 307333-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Appendix B – Dimethyl Disulfide Known Major Transformation and Degradation

ProductsDimethyl Disulfide (PC Code 029088; CAS No. 624-92-0)

Major Degradation and Transformation Products

Methanesulfonic Acid (CAS No. 74-93-1)

Fate Pathways of Formation : Aerobic Soil Metabolism, Aq uatic Photolysis (possible)

Methanesulfinic Acid (CAS No. 17696-73-0)

Fate Pathways of Formation : Aerobic Soil Metabolism, Aq uatic Photolysis (possible)

Sulfuric Acid (CAS No. 7664-93-9)

Fate Pathways of Formation : Aquatic Photolysis (possible)

Carbon Dioxide (CAS No. 124-38-9)

Fate Pathways of Formation : Aerobic Soil Metabolism



# O=C=O
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

 

JOHN TRUJILLO, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

LOU ARCHULETA; THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF 

COLORADO, 

 Respondents - Appellees. 

No. 15-1326 

(D.C. No. 1:15-CV-01061-LTB) 

(D. Colo.)

 

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

 

Before LUCERO, O’BRIEN, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges. 

 

 John Trujillo, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a certificate of 

appealability (COA) to appeal from the district court’s determination that his most 

recent 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application is an unauthorized second or successive § 2254 

application that it lacked jurisdiction to consider. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). 

We deny a COA and dismiss this matter. 

 Mr. Trujillo was convicted of first degree murder in 1995. He filed his first 

§ 2254 habeas action in 2004, which was dismissed for lack of merit. Most recently, 

 

* This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the 

case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its 

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

December 3, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
- 2 - 

he filed another § 2254 action that was dismissed by the district court for lack of 

jurisdiction. Trujillo v. Archuleta, No. 15-CV-1061-LTB, slip op. at 4 (D. Colo. 

Aug. 14, 2015). The court recognized that Mr. Trujillo had not obtained 

authorization from this court to file a second or successive application and his 

application should either be dismissed for lack or jurisdiction or transferred to this 

court. The court examined Mr. Trujillo’s claim that a secret plea agreement between 

the prosecution and the key witnesses against him at trial allegedly tainted his 

conviction and concluded the claim lacked merit. See § 2244(b)(2)(A),(B) (requiring 

a second or successive applicant to demonstrate that his claim is based on either a 

new rule of constitutional law or newly discovered evidence that establishes by clear 

and convincing evidence that he is not guilty). It thus declined to transfer the 

application to this court. See In re Cline, 531 F.3d 1249, 1251 (10th Cir. 2008) 

(per curiam) (one factor to consider in deciding whether to transfer an action is 

whether the claim is likely to have merit). 

 To obtain a COA, Mr. Trujillo must show “that jurists of reason would find it 

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was 

correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 

Reasonable jurists could not debate the district court’s decision to dismiss. 
- 3 - 

 We deny a COA and dismiss this matter. We grant Mr. Trujillo’s motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of costs or fees and remind him that 

he is obligated to make monthly payments until the filing and docket fees are paid in 

full. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2009                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.