alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.66


FIRST AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT BETWEEN FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY AND TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT, dated July 15, 2020, by and between Fidelity Management Trust Company (the “Trustee”) and Truist Financial Corporation (the “Sponsor”);


WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor heretofore entered into a Qualified Trust Agreement (“Trust Agreement”) dated July 15, 2020, with regard to the Truist Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor now desire to amend said Trust Agreement as provided for in Section 14 of the Master Services Agreement dated May 1, 2020;


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Trustee and the Sponsor hereby amend the Trust Agreement by:


1. Removing the last sentence of the second paragraph of the “Voting” subsection within I. Sponsor Stock of “Schedule A to the Qualified Trust Agreement”, which currently states:


Fidelity shall not vote shares of Sponsor Stock that reflect a Participant's interest in the Stock Fund for which Fidelity has received no direction from the Participant.


and replacing with:


Client and Administrator direct Fidelity to vote shares of Sponsor Stock that reflect a Participant’s interest in the Stock Fund for which Fidelity has received no directions from the Participant in the same proportion on each issue as it votes those shares that reflect all Participants’ interests in the Stock Fund (in the aggregate) for which it received voting instructions from Participants.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee and the Sponsor have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers effective as of the day and year first above written. By signing below, the undersigned represent that they are authorized to execute this document on behalf of the respective parties. Notwithstanding any contradictory provision of the agreement that this document amends, each party may rely without duty of inquiry on the foregoing representation. This Amendment may contain service and/or compensation information intended by Trustee to satisfy the requirements of Department of Labor regulation Section 2550.408b-2(c)(1) and which require review by the responsible plan fiduciary.


						
	TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION	FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY
	By:   Ellen Fitzsimmons                          9/11/2020                                             
	By:   /s/ Jennifer Bennet   9/18/2020 | 1:28 PM EDT                        

	
	Authorized signatory                     Date:	FMTC Authorized Signatory                      Date
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 8, 2018

No. 04-18-00561-CV

IN RE L.E.A. AND A.G.A., CHILDREN,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-02472

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 

368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. 

Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant with 

a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no 

pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also 

In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 

2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental 

rights). 

If the appellant desires to request the appellate record, he must file the motion requesting 

the record within ten days from the date of this order. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, 

he must do so within twenty days from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. 

If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days 

after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the 

motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further 

order of the court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 23
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-05679, Registration Statement No. 333-38589 and Registration Statement No.
333-38591 of Outdoor Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated June 24, 
1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Outdoor Systems, Inc.
401(k) Plan for the year ended December 31, 1997.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

June 30, 1998
WAYPOINT BANK                                             235 N. Second Street
                                                          Harrisburg, Pa 17101
                                                          Phone 717-909-2329
                                                          Fax 717-231-6186

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


Press Release



NEWS RELEASE



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
DECEMBER 20, 2002

Contact:  Steve Gardner
          Public Relations Manager
          (717) 909-2603


                       RANDALL L. HORST NAMED TO WAYPOINT
                       FINANCIAL CORP. BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     Harrisburg, PA--Waypoint Financial Corp.(Nasdaq:WYPT), the parent holding
company of Waypoint Bank, today announced the appointment of Randall L. Horst to
the company's Board of Directors to serve until the company's 2004 annual
meeting.

     Horst is the President and CEO of The Horst Group, a series of successful
construction, property management and insurance companies based in Lancaster,
Pennsylvania. He is the fifth generation to lead his family's business since its
formation in 1880.

     Horst currently serves on the Board of Cornerstone Design Ltd., architects,
and on the Board of Associates for Messiah College. He also is active in the
Central Pennsylvania real estate and homebuilders trade associations.

     "We are very fortunate to have someone with Randall's extensive real estate
and development background join our board of directors," said Waypoint Chairman
and CEO Charles C. Pearson, Jr. "He is a recognized leader in the real estate
and construction market in our service area."

     Waypoint Financial Corp., the holding company for Waypoint Bank, is a $5.8
billion financial services organization with 59 branch offices located
throughout South Central Pennsylvania and northern Maryland. Waypoint provides a
full range of financial services including banking for retail, commercial, and
small business customers, mortgages, trust and investment, brokerage, and
insurance to over 120,000 households and businesses.
No. 58803.

protest 216743-K (New York).

#### China Artware Co. and National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# L_2022089DE.01001001.xml

| 17.3.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 89/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 89/10

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie (EU) 2022/431 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 9. März 2022 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2004/37/EG über den Schutz der Arbeitnehmer gegen Gefährdung durch Karzinogene oder Mutagene bei der Arbeit

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 88 vom 16. März 2022
  )

Seite 10, Schlussformel:

Anstatt:

„Im Namen des Europäischen Parlaments

Der Präsident

R. METSOLA
  “

muss es heißen:

„Im Namen des Europäischen Parlaments

Die Präsidentin

R. METSOLA
  “.

---
May 13, 1963

No. 67729.

Appeal 5099.

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States.

C.D. 2308 affirmed January 16,1963. C.A.D. 813.
EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Aquasol EnviroTech Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken Z. Cai, Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Ken Z. CaiKen Z. Cai, Chairman August 31, 2007
No. 52124.

protests 101927-K, etc. (New York).

#### Artmart Linen Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-60880

Summary Calendar

JUAN HERNAN CONTRERAS,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A028 021 832

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Juan Hernan Contreras, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (the Board’s) decision denying his

motion to reconsider. Contreras’s motion to reconsider was filed after the

Board’s August 10, 2009 dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s

(IJ’s) denial of his motion to reopen his 1995 deportation proceedings. Contreras

did not file a petition for review of the Board’s August 10, 2009 dismissal of his

appeal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Guevara v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 173, 176 (5th

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 16, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-60880 Document: 00511323762 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2010
No. 09-60880

Cir. 2006). Therefore, that decision became final. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S.

386, 388-90, 394-95 (1995). Nevertheless, the arguments in Contreras’s brief are

all aimed at challenging the August 10, 2009 dismissal and the IJ’s denial of his

motion to reopen. Absent a timely petition for review of the August 10, 2009

order, this court lacks jurisdiction to review Contreras’s claims. See Stone,

514 U.S. at 394-95.

Although Contreras raised the issue of venue in his motion to reconsider,

he does not make any arguments relating to venue. He has therefore abandoned

the only issue before this court. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th

Cir. 2003). Contreras’s petition for review is therefore DENIED.

2

Case: 09-60880 Document: 00511323762 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2010
No. 63425.

Suit 4982.

#### United Metal Goods Mfg. Co. *v.*United States.

C.D. 2026 affirmed June 30, 1959. C.A.D. 712.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waste Industries USA, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ D. Stephen GrissomChief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2007
Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.



 BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 
  
 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K 
  
 EXHIBIT 10.1 (a) 
  
 AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
  
 RESOLVED, that the Briggs & Stratton Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following new Section 3.8 to read as follows effective as of July 1, 2003: 
  
 3.8 Special Enhancement. The amount payable hereunder to the individual who is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2003 (the “CEO”) shall be calculated on the assumption that he has
more years of Service and Credited Service than he actually has. The number of such additional years of Service and Credited Service shall be based on his date of termination of employment as CEO as set forth in the following schedule: 

 

	 Employment Termination Date

	  	Additional Years of Service
and Credited Service


	 On or after July 1, 2007, but before July 1, 2008
	  	1
		
	 On or after July 1, 2008, but before July 1, 2009
	  	2
		
	 On or after July 1, 2009, but before July 1, 2010
	  	3
		
	 On or after July 1, 2010, but before July 1, 2011
	  	4
		
	 On or after July 1, 2011
	  	5

  
 The previous sentence shall not be
applicable and, instead, the amounts payable to the CEO hereunder shall be calculated on the assumption that he has five additional years of Service and Credited Service should the CEO prior to July 1, 2011 while in the employ of the Company as CEO
die, incur a disability or incur a degenerative illness which causes the CEO to terminate employment.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 95

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative

to taxing the people of the United States progressively.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 10, 2000

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relative to taxing the people of the United States

progressively.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States:
2

•HJ 95 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Congress of the United States shall

3 tax all persons progressively in proportion to the income

4 which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the

5 United States.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en7 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Annette Eggert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

|   |                                            |                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|   |                                            | /s/ Annette Eggert   |
|   |  

Annette Eggert

Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date: April 15, 2009                       |

 

 

----
Before the Third Division,

December 3, 1962

No. 67239.

protest 60/28434 (New York).

#### Arnart Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

*317Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 O.O.P.A. 15, O.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10895)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1449, etc.

(Decided February 9, 1965)

*Stein & Shostalc*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*500Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of 'the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, consists of Christmas tree light sets, exported from Japan; and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values net packed, less the buying commission, shipping charges, and insurance premiums as set forth on the invoices.

> 2. That the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 3. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values for the involved merchandise were the invoice unit values, net, packed, less the buying commission, shipping charges, and insurance premiums as set forth on the invoices.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of US BioEnergy Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ Richard K. AtkinsonRichard K. AtkinsonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
National Geospatial Advisory Committee

NGAC Resolution

National Address Database

DECISION: The National Geospatial Advisory Committee adopted the 

following resolution on September 5, 2013:

“The NGAC reiterates its strong support for the development of a 

National Address Database in partnership with State, local, regional 

and Tribal governments; commends the Department of Commerce for 

its efforts to further this initiative; and encourages the FGDC Steering 

Committee to coordinate the development of a sustainable funding 

strategy.”