alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Jack Ferguson, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                   |  |  |  |                                                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Jack Ferguson                                            
|                   |  |  |  | Jack Ferguson                                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
No. 56880.

#### Charmeur Products, Inc., and Alltransport, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 185193-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ammonium ichthosulfonate the same in all material respects as the commodity passed upon in *United States*v. *Kachurin Drug Company*(39 C. C. P. A. 36, C. A. D. 459), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   268
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,695
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       268
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,470)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Form 20FR12G Registration Statement of Aquasol Envirotech Ltd. for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  Date: September 15, 2006   "Ken Z. Cai " Ken Z. Cai Chairman of The Board & Director
[ J

- 94

- 2019 ] [MO: Saylor, C.J. ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JASMINE WEEKS, VANESSA WILLIAMS, ARNELL HOWARD, PATRICIA SHALLICK,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Appellants

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OF

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 22 EAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court entered on August 1, 2019 at No. 409 MD 2019.

ARGUED: October 16, 2019

CONCURRING O PINION

JUSTICE TODD DECIDED: December 18, 2019

I join the Majority Opinion. In my view, whether the passage of Act 12 violated the

“original purpose” or “single subject” mandates in Article III, §§ 1 and 3 of the

Pennsylvania Constitution is a close question

. At the preliminary stage of this litigation,

however, this Court is not asked to decide this ultimate constitutional question, but only

to determine whether the Commonwealth Court had “any apparently reasonable grounds”

to support its denial of preliminary injunctive relief

. S ee S ummit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. Shoe

Show of Rocky Mount, Inc. , 828 A.2d 995, 1000 ( Pa. 2003)

. A s such , for the reasons

expressed by Chief Justice Saylor in his Majority Opinion , I agree that the Commonwealth

Court did not abuse its discretion in concluding Appellants did not carry their burden to

establish a likelihood of success on the merits. I n everthel ess withhold judg ment on the[ J

- 94

- 2019 ] [MO: Saylor, C.J. ]

- 2

underlying constitutional question. Cf. Washington v. Dep’t of Public Welfare , 188 A.3d

1135 (Pa. 2018 ) ( in process challenge to legislation allegedly enacted in violation of

Article III, § 4 of the Pennsylvania Consti tution , this Court, although initially affirming

denial of request for preliminary injunction, ultimately found legislation to be

unconstitutional ).

Justices Donohue and Dougherty join this opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                        25
<INVENTORY>                                      1,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,279
<PP&E>                                           1,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                     166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,852
<BONDS>                                            744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,979
<SALES>                                            765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   765
<CGS>                                              503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         643,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               692,603
<PP&E>                                         510,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,203,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,222
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,032,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,203,364
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               208,568
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (192,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (192,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (192,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 4, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00283

- CV

J. D. S., Appellant

v.

Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BE FORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE, AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS

THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. IT IS FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal

both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
July 17, 1946

No. 51253.

Suit 4530.

#### United *States*v. *Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.*

reversed May 7, 1946. C. A. D. 337.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 317 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.317
                                           Agreed to May 8, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas His Eminence John Cardinal O'Connor was born John Joseph 
  O'Connor on January 15, 1920, in southwest Philadelphia, the son of 
  Thomas and Mary O'Connor;

Whereas his duty to God and country led him to serve loyally as a 
  chaplain in the United States Navy, counseling thousands of brave 
  young men and women during his tenure, which included tours of duty 
  during the Vietnam War;

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor served the people of the Archdiocese of 
  New York with honor and distinction for over 15 years;

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor became an internationally recognized 
  leader in the field of human rights, working for peace and justice;

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor was a champion of Catholic schools, 
  particularly in inner-city communities;

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor has always spoken out and acted to aid 
  the elderly, homeless, working people, the mentally disabled, and the 
  poor;

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor has provided compassion through his 
  words and actions and made it known that everyone was a child of God 
  and was deserving of love, compassion, and respect;

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor led the Catholic Church in recognizing 
  the terrible toll of AIDS and opened New York State's first AIDS-only 
  unit, at St. Claire's Hospital;

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor worked tirelessly to strengthen 
  relations between Catholics and followers of the Jewish faith, 
  recognizing the power of the interfaith alliance and leading the 
  Vatican to recognize the State of Israel; and

Whereas John Cardinal O'Connor was guided in his actions by the Spirit 
  of the Lord: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
        (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the death of His 
    Eminence John Cardinal O'Connor on May 3, 2000, and extends 
    condolences to his family and to the Archdiocese of New York;
        (2) expresses its profound gratitude to John Cardinal O'Connor 
    and his family for the service that he rendered to his country and 
    his faith; and
        (3) recognizes with appreciation and respect John Cardinal 
    O'Connor's commitment to and example of faith, love, respect, and 
    dignity for all mankind.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1574

SONYA Y. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HIGH POINT REGIONAL HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-97-165-2)

Submitted: July 28, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sonya Y. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Jill

S. Stricklin, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing her action brought

under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to establish a prima

facie case of race discrimination due to her discharge from employment. See Karpel v. Inova Health Sys. Servs., 134 F.3d 1222, 1228

(4th Cir. 1998). She also failed to show the court abused its

discretion in denying her motion for an extension of discovery and

for appointment of counsel. See Strag v. Board of Trustees, Craven

Community College, 55 F.3d 943, 954 (4th Cir. 1995); Miller v.

Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 966 (4th Cir. 1987). Finally, the issues

raised for the first time on appeal regarding her claim under the

Freedom of Information Act and her injuries are not properly before

this court. See Karpel, 134 F.3d at 1227. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. High Point Reg’l

Hosp., No. CA-97-165-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 53393.

protest 143482-K (New York);

#### Ted Krause & Son *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record disclosed that the motion to dismiss was well-founded. The motion was therefore granted.
No. 61219.

protests 287920-K, etc. (New York).

#### Accurate Millinery Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         The Schedule  Contains  Summary  Financial  Information  Extracted From
         Balance Sheets and Statements of Income
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Mar-31-1999   
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-01-1999   
<PERIOD-END>                                       Mar-31-1999   
<CASH>                                                 110,927   
<SECURITIES>                                                 0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,101,146   
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (406,953)   
<INVENTORY>                                          2,853,180   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,850,832   
<PP&E>                                                 799,867   
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (753,536)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,897,163   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,531,710   
<BONDS>                                                      0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0  
<PREFERRED>                                          3,045,535   
<COMMON>                                            17,667,024   
<OTHER-SE>                                         (18,347,106)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,897,163   
<SALES>                                              2,239,093   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,239,093   
<CGS>                                                  778,821   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          778,821   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        84,032   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      22,457   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (307,130)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (307,130)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0   
<CHANGES>                                                    0   
<NET-INCOME>                                          (307,130)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (0.09)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.09)   
                                              


</TABLE>
Z.R., MOTHER OF S.W., P.L. 

AND S.P., MINOR CHILDREN,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-2386

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 25, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Michael G. Allen, Judge.

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee; Alexis Fields, and 

Thomasina Moore, Guardian Ad Litem Program, Sanford, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the Annual Report of Birch Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB-A2 for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Nelson L. Colvin, President, and Keith L. Walton, Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


 /s/ Nelson L. Colvin
-----------------------
Nelson L. Colvin
President
11/08/2005



  /s/ Keith L. Walton
--------------------
Keith L. Walton
Treasurer
11/08/2005