alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 85 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 85

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Appointing the day for the convening of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Sixth Congress.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 85

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Appointing the day for the convening of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF SECOND SESSION OF ONE HUNDRED SIXTH 
              CONGRESS.

    The second regular session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress shall 
begin at noon on Monday, January 24, 2000.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SESSION PRIOR TO CONVENING.

    If the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Majority 
Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the 
Minority Leader of the House of Representatives and the Minority Leader 
of the Senate, determine that it is in the public interest for the 
Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate to reassemble 
prior to the convening of the second regular session of the One Hundred 
Sixth Congress as provided in section 1--
            (1) the Speaker and Majority Leader shall so notify their 
        respective Members; and
            (2) Congress shall reassemble at noon on the second day 
        after the Members are so notified.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip M. Pead, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in
such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                             By: /s/ PHILIP M. PEAD
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Philip M. Pead
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 9, 2005















                                        2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PolyMedica
Corporation ("PolyMedica") for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Samuel L. Shanaman, Lead Director and Interim Chief Executive
Officer, and Stephen C. Farrell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of PolyMedica, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      PolyMedica.

                                       /s/ Samuel L. Shanaman
                                       ------------------------------------
Dated: August 18, 2003                 Samuel L. Shanaman
                                       Lead Director and Interim Chief
                                       Executive Officer

                                       /s/ Stephen C. Farrell
                                       ------------------------------------
Dated: August 18, 2003                 Stephen C. Farrell
                                       Senior Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer


                                     - 38 -
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 76

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 22, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and

Pensions

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the social problem of child abuse and neglect,

and supporting efforts to enhance public awareness of it.

Whereas more than 3,000,000 American children are reported as suspected victims of child abuse and neglect

annually;

Whereas more than 500,000 American children are unable to

live safely with their families and are placed in foster

homes and institutions;
2

HCON 76 RFS

Whereas it is estimated that more than 1,000 children, 78

percent under the age of 5 and 38 percent under the age

of 1, lose their lives as a direct result of abuse and neglect every year in America;

Whereas this tragic social problem results in human and economic costs due to its relationship to crime and delinquency, drug and alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and

welfare dependency; and

Whereas Childhelp USA has initiated a ‘‘Day of Hope’’ to be

observed on the first Wednesday in April, during Child

Abuse Prevention Month, to focus public awareness on

this social ill: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that—

4 (A) all Americans should keep these vic5 timized children in their thoughts and prayers;

6 (B) all Americans should seek to break

7 this cycle of abuse and neglect, and give our

8 children hope for the future; and

9 (C) the faith community, nonprofit organi10 zations, and volunteers across America should

11 recommit themselves and mobilize their re12 sources to assist these children; and

13 (2) the Congress—

14 (A) supports the goals and ideas of the

15 ‘‘Day of Hope’’; and
3

HCON 76 RFS

1 (B) commends Childhelp USA for its ef2 forts on behalf of abused and neglected children

3 everywhere.

Passed the House of Representatives February 14,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Motion Granted in Part and Denied as Moot in Part; Order filed October 29, 

2019. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00486-CV

____________

IN RE ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR., Relator

____________

NO. 14-18-00487-CV

____________

ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR., Appellant

V.

BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-39002

ORDER

On October 10, 2019, appellant filed a motion to recall the mandate in these 

consolidated proceedings on the ground that he did not receive notice of this court’s 
opinion and judgment issued July 23, 2019. Appellant’s motion is granted in cause 

number 14-18-00487-CV, the appeal in these proceedings. Because no mandate 

issued in cause number 14-18-00486-CV, appellant’s motion is denied as moot. 

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due in this court on or before November 

8, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot. (Chief Justice 

Frost would deny the motion).
**PricewaterhouseCoopers
              LLP**PricewaterhouseCoopers
              CenterCenter
              300 Madison AvenueNew
              York NY 10017Telephone
              (646) 471 3000Facsimile
              (813) 286 6000






**Report
      of Independent Accountants**




To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholder


of
      GMAC
      Mortgage Corporation:




We
      have
      examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its subsidiaries
      (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
      in the
      Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for* *Mortgage
      Bankers* ("USAP")
      as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying
      management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's
      compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express
      an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on
      our examination.




Our
      examination was performed in accordance with attestation standards established
      by the American
      Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
      on a test
      basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards and
      performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
      circumstances. We believe
      that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
      examination does
      not
      provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
      31, 2005 is fairly stated, in
      all
      material respects.




/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




March
      21,
      2006
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital, Inc.
      (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Christopher A.
      Milner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James J. Lillis, as
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
              Christopher A.
              MilnerName:
              Christopher A. MilnerTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 11, 2008/s/ James J. LillisName:
              James J. LillisTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 11, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 88

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to make 
  eligible for the Office of President a person who has been a United 
                    States citizen for twenty years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 29, 2000

 Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to make 
  eligible for the Office of President a person who has been a United 
                    States citizen for twenty years.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``A person who is a citizen of the United States, who has been for 
twenty years a citizen of the United States, and who is otherwise 
eligible to the Office of President, is not ineligible to that Office 
by reason of not being a native born citizen of the United States.''
                                 <all>
```
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51169

Summary Calendar

GEOFFREY E. ROHDE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

RIPPY SURVEYING CO.; CP RIPPY SURVEYING; CL RIPPY SURVEYING CO.

INC.; RIPPY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; RIPPY ENGINEERING CO.

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

A-98-CV-179-JN)

August 20, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant complains to this court of the district court’s

grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants dismissing

Appellant’s constructive discharge claim brought under Title VII.

He lists five issues for appeal but in the body of his somewhat

rambling brief he discusses others as well. We have given his

brief the widest possible reading and considered all arguments

advanced in light of the record and find no reversible error by the

district court.

First, the district court dismissed the action for failure to
2

abide by the time requirements of Title VII. The record clearly

demonstrates that this decision was correct. Additionally, the

district court found, as an alternative basis for its ruling, that

Defendants did not constitute an “employer” as that term is defined

in Title VII. That decision is also correct. Finally the district

court treated Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion as a Rule 59 motion

which it was completely free to do.

Nor do we find any error in the method of calculating or the

justification for awarding costs and attorney’s fees to Defendant.

AFFIRMED.
Before the Third Division,

March 9, 1960

No. 63940.

protest 59/19357 (New York).

#### Penson & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
{"agency":"FERC","generated":"2018-04-26 20:19:27","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FERC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["36"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["29"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["9"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q1"}
# Official Journal L 92/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.092.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 92 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 563 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.092.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 92

English edition

Legislation

Volume 563 April 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2013/150/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 9 January 2012 SA.30584 (C 38/10, ex NN 69/10) on the State aid implemented by Hungary in favour of Malév Hungarian Airlines Zrt.
  (notified under document C(2011) 9316)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2013/151/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 19 September 2012 on the State aid SA.30908 (11/C, ex N 176/10) implemented by the Czech Republic for České aerolinie, a.s. (ČSA — Czech Airlines — Restructuring plan)
  (notified under document C(2012) 6352)

   (1) | 16 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2013/150/EU

*

Commission Decision of 9 January 2012 SA.30584 (C 38/10, ex NN 69/10) on the State aid implemented by Hungary in favour of Malév Hungarian Airlines Zrt.
  (notified under document C(2011) 9316)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 9316)

1

2013/151/EU

*

Commission Decision of 19 September 2012 on the State aid SA.30908 (11/C, ex N 176/10) implemented by the Czech Republic for České aerolinie, a.s. (ČSA — Czech Airlines — Restructuring plan)
  (notified under document C(2012) 6352)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 6352)

16

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: REGINAL C. GILBERT

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00123-CR

Appeal from the

142nd Judicial District Court

of Midland County, Texas

(TC# CR-57,536)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed as moot. We therefore dismiss the appeal as moot. This decision shall be certified below 

for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2022.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
# PreFiledILP_4.9.2024

https://elibrary.ferc.gov/http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary/quick-tip.pdf
No. 53389.

protests 136684-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. v. United States,

*132Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to Registration
Statement No. 333-76419 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of
our report dated February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account Seven relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.5


                               HOLLY CORPORATION

         PROXY FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS ______________, 1998

                 SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

P         Lamar Norsworthy, Gerald L. Regard and Jack P. Reid, or any of them or
     their substitutes, are hereby appointed proxies to represent and to vote
R    the stock of Holly Corporation standing in the name(s) of the undersigned
     at Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held __________________ on
O    _____________, 1998 and at all adjournments thereof.

X         TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF
     DIRECTORS MARK THE BOX LABELED "FOR" ADOPTION OF THE MERGER, THE MERGER
Y    AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, DATE AND SIGN ON THE
     REVERSE SIDE.


                                                                     -----------
                                                                     SEE REVERSE
                                                                         SIDE
                                                                     -----------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NORTHERN CAMBRIA SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Petitioner

v.

NORTHERN CAMBRIA EDUCATION

SUPPORT PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, PSEA/NEA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 142 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Schuff Steel Company on Form S-8 of our report dated August 5,
1997, except for Note 10 as to which the date is March 18, 1998, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Addison Structural Services, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and for each of the years in the three year
period ended June 30, 1997, which was included in the Current Report on Form
8K/A dated June 18, 1998.


                                                  /s/ MAULDIN & JENKINS, LLC





Albany, Georgia
October 27, 1998


                                       10