PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF FISH 

AT HYDROPOWER PROJECTS 

A Report on Studies and Protective Measures 

Volume 2: Appendices 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

Office of Hydropower Licensing 

Washington, DC 

Paper No. DPR-10 

December 1994 
CONTENTS 

• VOLUME 2 • 

APPENDICES 

Appendix 1 Listing of Sites Considered for Inclusion in the Database . . . . . . . . . . Al-l 

Appendix 2 Explanation of Data Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A2-1 

Appendix 3 Entrainment Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A3-1 

3.1 Numerical Portion of Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A3 .1-1 

3.2 Narrative Portion of Database .................... A3.2-1 

Appendix 4 Detailed Statistical Results and Plots of Exploratory Regression 

Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . A4-l 

Appendix 5 Detailed Statistical Results of Supplemental Statistical Analyses . . . . . . AS-1 

i 
APPENDIX 1 

LISTING OF SITES CONSIDERED 

FOR INCLUSION IN THE DATABASE 
APPENDIX 1- SITES IDENTIFIED AS POTENTIALLY HAVING ENTRAINMENT STUDIES AVAILABLE 

II I REPORT STATUS I I I 

i (ACQUIRED, PARTY SUITABLE FOR 

I PROJECT NAME/ REQUESTED FROM OR INCLUSION IN 1 PERC NO. (STATE) DUE DATE) DATABASE (Y/N) EXPLANATION IF NOT SUITABLE 

Station 26 acquired y 

2584 (NY) 

Little Falls N very limited netting to evaluate trash rack screen 

3509 (NY) 

Beaver Falls acquired y 

3451 (PA) 

Ithaca Falls N entrainment study not confirmed 

6744 (NY) 

Little Falls no entrainment studies; N no entrainment studies conducted 

9194 (NJ) screen being installed 

Y oughiogheny Lake acquired y 

3623 (PA) 

Dam No.4 acquired y 

(WV) . 

Luray/Newport acquired N no entrainment studies conducted 

2425 (VA) I 

Shenandoah acquired N no entrainment studies conducted 

2509 i (VA) ! 

Warren acquired N no entrainment studies conducted I 

2391 (VA) 

Al-l 
99 Islands acquired y 

2331 (SC) 

Gaston Shoals acquired y 

2322 (SC) 

Saluda acquired y 

2406 (SC) 

Hollidays Bridges acquired y 

2465 (SC) 

Buzzards Roost acquired y 

1267 (SC) 

Abbeville acquired y 

11286 (SC) 

Tower & Kleber acquired y 

10615 (MI) 

Moores Park acquired y 

10684 (MI) 

Prickett acquired y 

2402 (MI) 

Escanaba acquired y 

2506 (MI) 

French Landing acquired y 

9951 (MI) 

Alcona acquired y 

2447 (MI) 

Five Channels acquired y 

2453 (MI) 

Foote acquired y 

2436 (MI) 

Al-3 
Pine acquired N only 3 months sampled before barrier net installed; study 

2486-002 (WI) not designed to address entrainment abundance; agencies 

suggested not including this study in database 

Brule acquired y 

2431 (WI) 

Thornapple acquired y 

2475 (WI) 

Crowley acquired y 

2473-002 (WI) 

Rothschild acquired y 

2212 (WI) 

Wise. Riv. Div. acquired y 

2590 (WI) 

Centralia acquired y 

2255 (WI) 

Park Mill acquired y 

2744 (WI) 

White Rapids acquired y 

2357 (WI) 

Little Quinnsec only six months of data N data included in study report from August 1990 to Feb. 

2356 (WI) 1991 ; annual entrainment cannot be estimated because data 

from key months are missing, monthly data of limited 

usefulness 

Chalk Hill entrainment study not done N turbine mortality study only; entrainment abundance to be 

2394 (WI) extrapolated from White Rapids data 

St. qoud N entrainment of ichthyoplankton only; focus of this 

4108 (MN) entrainment review project is juvenile and older fish 

Al-5 
Tungstar discussed with federal officials; N entrainment study ·not confirmed 

7267 (CA) existence of study questionable 

Graeagle infiltration gallery intake N no entrainment studies conducted 

10505 (CA) 

Bishop Creek acquired N hydroacoustics not effective in penstock; partial flow 

1394 (CA) tailrace netting collected only 12 fish in 2000 hrs 

Haas/King River acquired N no entrainment studies done 

1988 (CA) 

Leaburg no entrainment studies N only turbine mortality studies in mid-l950s 

2496 (OR) 

Walterville no entrainment studies N only turbine mortality studies in mid-l950s 

2510 (OR) 

Blue River hydro plant not yet constructed N no entrainment studies done 

3109 (OR) 

Bull Run entrainment protection installed N no entrainment studies done 

0477 (OR) 

Condit entrainment protection installed N no entrainment studies done 

2342 (WA) 

Wynoochee Dam discussed with licensee's rep. N no hydro project, yet; studies have been done to evaluate 

6482 (WA) (Harza Northwest) mortality due to outlet structure 

Elwha acquired possibly studies pertain to anadromous salmon species only; site 

2683 (WA) geographically isolated from rest of sites in. database 

Snoqualmie Falls acquired possibly represents plants with difficult sampling config.; results not 

2494 (WA) likely to be comparable to other sites in database 

Yelm discussed with federal officials; N entrainment study not confirmed 

10703 (WA) existence of study is questionable 

Al-7 
APPENDIX2 

EXPLANATION OF DATA FIELDS 
APPENDIX 2- DATABASE FIELD EXPLANATIONS 

DATA FIELDS (COLUMN HEADINGS) 

A. GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION 

1. PLANT NAME 

2. FERC NO. 

3. RIVER NAME 

4. RIVER MILE 

5. A VG RIVER FLOW (CFS) 

6. WATERSHED 

7. COUNTY 

8. STATE 

B. RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS 

1. SURF ACE SIZE (ACRES) 

2. TOTAL STORAGE (AC-FT) 

3. USABLE STORAGE (AC-FT) 

4. THROUGH PLANT FLUSHING 

RATE (DAYS) 

5. LENGTH (MILES) 

6. MAX. WIDTH (FT) 

COMMENTS ON NOTATION 

Normally, the distance from the mouth of the river to the project, unless the local convention is 

to do otherwise 

When not indicated in the material provided, S & W has used the most recent in-house USGS water 

yearbook available; more recent average flow figures may be available from licensees 

Total storage/through-plant hydraulic capacity (this may relate more to entrainment rates than true 

flushing rate) 

A2·-l 
D. ENTRAINMENT DATA SOURCE/MONITORING METHODS 

1. DATA SOURCE Author and year. When a'firm was subcontracted to do netting or hydroacoustic sampling, that 

2. MONITORING METHOD 

3. NET TYPE 

4. UNITS SAMPLED 

5. NO. OF MONTHS SAMPLED BY NET 

6. NETTING HOURS PER MONTH 

7. NET SAMPUNG EFFICIENCY(%) 

firm is indicated parenthetically (abbreviations used are as follows: BWEC= Barnes-Williams 

Environmental Consultants, BS= Biosonics) 

Net, HA (Hydroacoustics), or both 

FFfR=Full Flow Tailrace Net, PFfR=Partial Flow Tailrace Net, PFTG=Partial Flow Turbine 

Gallery Net, PFFB=Partial Flow Forebay Net 

# Sampled of # of total 

Give range if applicable 

Give range of values if tested with fish releases unless only an average is presented; if efficiency 

determined by through-turbine releases (TTR), values should be placed in the column labeled TTR. 

If efficiency determined by direct net releases (NR), values should be placed in the column labeled 

NR 

8. ENTRAINMENT ESTIMATE ADJUSTED This is usually not done when net data is only designed to provide species composition and length 

FOR SAMPUNG EFFICIENCY (Y/N) frequency information 

9. ENTRAINMENT ESTIMATED SEPARATELY 

BY UNIT (Y /N) 

lO.TURBINE MORTAUTY STUDIED (Y/N) 

E. WATER QUAUTY DATA AVAILABLE 

1. MONTHLY TEMP. DATA AVAIL (Y/N) 

2. MONTHLY FOREBAY D.O. AVAIL (YIN) 

3. MONTHLY WATER CLARITY DATA 

AVAIL (Y/N) 

Indicates availability for future analysis 

Indicates availability for future analysis 

Indicates availability for future analysis; usually reported as Secchi disc readings. 

A2-3 
H. MONTHLY AND ANNUAL ENTRAINMENT RATE BY SPECIES 

1. BASIS (NET OR HYDROACOUSTIC) When net derived relative abundance values are applied to hydroacoustic estimates of total 

2. SPECIES NAME 

3. AVERAGE SIZE (IN) and 

4. MEDIAN SIZE (IN) 

5. % OF TOTAL PLANT CAPACITY 

REPRESENTED 

6. JAN (FISH PER HOUR) 

7. FEB II II II II II 

8. MAR II II II II II II 

9. APR II II II II II II 

IO.MAY If II H If If II 

ll.JUN n 11 11 11 11 11 

12.JUL 11 11 II II II II 

13.AUG II II II II II II 

14.SEP II II II II II II 

15.0CT II II II tl tl II 

16.NOV oi 11 11 11 11 11 

17.DEC II II II II II II 

18.TOTAL ANNUAL (fish/hr) and 

19.TOTAL ANNUAL (number) 

20.SPECIES PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL 

ENTRAINED 

abundance, "both 11 is indicated. 

Individual species followed by total for all species. Total number of fish collected by net is indicated 

next to total when available. 

Average (mean) size preferable but if not readily available, include the median or mode (mode 

is preferable to median, but must be specified in explanatory comments section). 

When possible, entrainment rates are presented for the entire plant using assumptions 

made by licensee. When this is not appropriate, the proportion of the total plant hydraulic capacity 

represented by the entrainment estimate is indicated. 

When monthly entrainment as total number of fish is presented by licensee, hourly rate usually 

calculated by dividing the total number of fish by the number of hours in the month. 

Unless provided by licensee, species specific annual rates derived by apportioning the total annual 

rate by the relative abundance presented in column H20. When the hydroacoustically derived values 

are considered the best estimate of total entrainment, the relative abundance was applied to the 

hydroacoustically derived total entrainment values. In such cases, monthly entrainment rates are 

still those derived from netting data unless otherwise noted. When total annual number provided 

by licensee, total annual rate derived by dividing the total number by the number of hours in a year. 

Relative abundance of entrained fish unless only data available is for collected fish (the two values 

are usually similar if collections taken during representative sampling periods); species comprising 

1.0% or more of the total catch are typically listed. 

A2-5 
APPENDIX3 

ENTRAINMENT DATABASE 

3.1 Numerical Portion of Database 

3.2 Narrative Portion of Database 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 Draft 

A. Geographical Information B. Reservoir Characteriatict 

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 AS A7 AS 81 82 83 B4 85 86 

-.; 

i 

J!! 

.. 

a:: 

:E ~ 

~ I :E u .. .!! i 

;r .. .!! t a: ;g .. .!! t i I J J a: ~ ~ :1 = I 1:15 .. l5: g l a .e .;; l !;E 1!2 f U> • J i ... = = ' ~ .. "! a:: i' t Iii l w l5: ... 1!2 1!2 < ... .;; ~ ::> .: :IE 

Alcon a 2447 Au Sable 38 1182 Au Sable Alcon a Ml 1075 25000 1470 3.9 3.7 

Foote 2436 Au Sable 12 1339 Au Sable lose a Ml 1800 30000 1824 3.7 5.7 

Cooke 2450 Au Sable 22 1320 Au Sable Iosee Ml 1800 30000 1743 4.2 7.6 j 

Loud 2449 Au Sable 33 1289 Au Sable lose a Ml 790 12600 1056 2.4 4.2 

Mio 2448 Au Sable 73 988 Au Sable Oscoda Ml 860 12000 389 2.2 5.5 

Five Channels 2453 Au Sable 29 1298 Au Sable Iosee Ml 250 4000 124 0.67 2.8 

Croton 2468 Muskegon 47 1872 Muskegon Newaygo Ml 1209 21932 1181 3 2.2/4.3 250013200 

Rogers 2451 Muskegon 89 1343 Muskegon Mecosta Ml 610 10000 300 2.1 2.5 2100 

Hardy 2452 Muskegon 58 1459 Muskegon Mec./Neweygo Ml 3902 134973 6007 15.1 17.6 6300 

Moores Park 10684 Grand 622 Grand Ingham Ml 240 2000 2000 0.84 8.2 

Tower 10615 Black 270 Black Cheboygan Ml 102 620 NA 0.87 0.9 

Kleber 10615 Black 270 Black Cheboygan Ml 270 3000 NA 3.8 0.9 

Buchanan 2551 St Joseph 33 3636 St. Joseph Berrien Ml 423 3895 NA 0.52 8 1300' 

Constantine 10661 St Joseph 103 1280 St Joseph St Joseph Ml 525 NA 5.8 1500 

Prickett 2402 Sturgeon 44 421 Portage Baraga Ml 773 13887 4500 10.8 3.5 2970 

Escanaba Dam 1 2506 Escanaba 1 968.8 Escanaba Marquette\Delta Ml 75 375 0.16 0.6 1000 

Escanaba Dam 3 2506 Escanaba 3 902.8 Escanaba Marquette\Della Ml 182 1100 0.44 1.3 1400 

French Landing 9951 Huron Wayne Ml 1270 

Lock &Dam #2 4306 Mississippi 26 9635 Upper Mississippi Dakota MN 11810 4700 

Park Mill 2744 Menominee 3.6 3400 Menominee Marinette WI 539 3788 NA 4 2600 

While Rapids 2357 Menominee 55 3080 Menominee Marinette WI . 435 5155 415 0.5 2.3 580 

Brule 2431 Brule 2 550 Menominee Florence WI 545 8880 530 3.2 5.2 340 

Thornappla 2475 Flambeau 8 1860 Flambeau Rusk WI 295 1000 295 0.36 4 600 

~-

Crowley 2473 North Fork Flambeau 82 795 Flalmbeau - J>rjce. 'lw'L 422 3539 0 1.21 

A3.1-1 OPC 1993 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 Draft 

A. Geographicllllnlormetion B. R11ervoir Characterittict 

AI A2 A3 A4 A5 AS A7 AS 81 82 83 B4 85 88 

I 

~ 

i 1 ~ ~ f .. .. s ! s t g; 

~ 

J J g; ! t i I ti ! i li J .. ,;; II: .. i :1 ;;; • I j !i 

i u ! ! li! !! ! ~ "! i ... ffi .. .. ~ ;;; .;J t!! .. II: ... I!! I!! c( ... ::I :15 

'--~ Station 28 ~ L_ ____ Genessee 7 2930 ~assee ~-- !IL 90 2000 NA 0.6 3 350 

A3.1-3 DPC 1993 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 Draft 

C. Plant Description D. Entrainment Data Source/Monitoring Mithoda I 

Cl C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 ca C9 ClO Cll C12 C13 Dl D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 DB 9 11!] 

I 

~ 

i i 1 

z 

I= ~ ~ ~ E 

I ~ 5 

~ ffi I l l ~ c ~ ·i ~ ~ 

~ I .~ I :z: ~ f ·b' " ~ 0 1 ~ IL 1 l:i' i 'D .; :: rr: i! e :::> I ~ ... ... l i I ~ i J .s 8 .I = .r I I :I! 'D 'D it <> ·~ rr: :I! IL lD ~ ~ ~ i b' i ~ b .; I 'i ! ~- IL ~ 

:.:1 ~ .! c :I! J I! f I!' : J ' ., i :I! .J ! s .s il b' il j ... il 'D I!' l ~ 

<> ~ .f . ., :3 :3 d! 0 .. ·c ! :z: 

Jl 5 .. :z: :z: J .I ... a: I I!' 

~ J i i ~ ~; I! j t t l > l ! ·i ~ 'f! It !i!" II: Q ~ ~ Q Q Q Q c Q I :::> ll!i :! I I .E 

Upper 11 720 0.9 2 ROR 0 PC Per 0 13.8 580 z 1.75 BWEC 93 HA NA 2of2 A NA NA NA N N 

Lower 30.7 930 1.2 3 ROR 0 FB Per 0 12.2 1104 1.7 3.5 BWEC 93 HA NA 3of3 A NA NA NA N N 

Pixley 13 875 0.98 2 ROR 0 FB Per 0 18 1397 1.5 1.75 BWEC 93 HA NA 2of 2 A NA NA NA N N 

Rothschild 29 3300 3.84 7 ROR 0 FB Per 0 15 1.512.8 1.375 D+M93 Net FFTR 2 of7 12 24-98 41·95 y y y 

Wisconsin R.D. 29 5120 1.8 10 ROR 0 FB Per 0 19 1.412.8 2.2514.125 Harza 93 Net FFTR of 10 9 24-48 27·81 y N Y·, 

Centralia 23 3840 3.2 8 ROR 0 PC Per 0 14.2 2.112.2 3.515.8 Harza 92 Net FFTR 1 of 8 11 24-48 27·82 y N y! 

Shawano 18.5 835 0.7 1 ROR 0 FB Per 3 18 803 5 BWEC 92 Both FFTR 1 of 1 11 48·98 88 y A y 

King Mill NA 2.05 2 ROR NA FB Par 1.48 2 NAI92 Net PFTR 2of2 8 72·120 y N y 

991slands 88 4498 18 8 PK 2 FB Ang 7.75 28.25 5.8 Duke Power 91 Both FFTR 1 of 8 9 48 NG y N Ni 

Gaston Shoals 73 2885 9.1 3 PK 2 FB Per 13.8 28.8 Duke Power 91 Both FFTR 1 of 3 8 48 NG y N N 

Saluda 55 800 2.4 4 PK 1 FB Per 13.2 23.2 7.2 Duke Power 91 Both FFTR 1 of 4 9 98 NG y N N 

Holliday's Bridge 35 1810 3.5 4 PK 1 PC Per 18.8 27.8 7.2 Duke Power 91 Both FFTR 1 of 4 5 98 NG y N N 

Buzzard's Roost 87 4000 15 3 PK 20 FB Per 3 38.8 Duke Power 92 Both FFTR 1 of 3 12 72-98 NG N N y 

Abbeville 80 390 2.8 2 PK 1.5-8 FB Per 49.2 1181 2.8 RWBack 92 Nat PFTR 1 of 2 7 98 NG N y N 

Hawks Nest 58 10000 102 4 ROR 0 FB Per 7 41 5810 1.8 3.2 KS90(BWECI Both PFTR 4of 4 12 48·98 NG N N N 

Dam# 4 (19881 18.5 1120 1.1 2 ROR 0 FB Per 3 12 588 0.95 1.25 EEM 88 Net FFTR 1 of 2 7 151·471 83·80 y y y 

Dam #4 (19921 18.5 1849 2.1 3 ROR 0 FB Per 3 12 588 1.24 1.25 EEM93 Net FFTR 1 of 3 11 72·528 92 y y y 

Millville 12 2220 2.84 3 ROR 0 PC Per 3 18 780 1.09 2.5 EEM,92,91,90 Net FFTR 1 of 3 12 24-589 79 y y y 

88 

Greenup L+D 30 35598 89 3 ROR 1 Per 32 72 8·10. 4 CH2MHILL88(BSI Both PFTG 1 of 3 3 14-25 NG N y N 

Beaver Falls 17.2 4400 5 2 ROR 0 FB 5.5 KS 92 Net FFTR 1 of 2 8 24-72 94-97 N N y 

Youghiogheny 177 1800 12.2 2 ROR 20 FB Ang 30·50 100·120 2295 0.7 10 RMC 92 Net FFTR 2of 2 12 30 48·100 y y 

A3.1-5 DPC 1993 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 Draft 

E. Water quality Data Available F. Average Monthly river Flow (cf•l During Study 

El E2 E3 Fl F2 F3 F4 FS FS F7 F8 F9 FtD Fll F12 F13 

~ 2 ~ 'i 

.:c E 'I 'i I ,. During > c Q 

c ci e S..,iing I ci 'I: 

Q .. c3 (DSI or 

I f I Total 

J .f Monthly .. .. .. i I I I Avo 

• I l ,. .. ITMAI i ;! .f !i ~ 1 'G ~ .. II: :IE :IE .., :IE .., .., 0 Q 

Alcona N N N 

Foote N N N 

Cook a N N N 

loud N N N 

Mio N N N 

Five Channels N N N 

Croton N N N 

Rogers N N N 

Hardy N N N 

Moores Park y y y TMA 526 646 1085 1098 736 457 312 220 219 280 380 498 

Tower y y y 

Kleber y y y 

Buchanan y y y TMA 8664 6342 6973 4568 3677 3263 3175 6049 5797 7366 

Constantina y y N 

Prickett y N N 

Escanaba Dam 1 y y y OS 885 2505 670 460 453 352 391 

Escanaba Dam 3 y y y OS 1176 892 1850 876 329 346 308 606 617 271 

French Landino N N N 

lock &Dam #2 y y N 

Park Mill y y y TMA 1883 2098 3840 1878 4889 3977 1748 1852 2558 2558 2104 2117 

White Rapids y y N TMA 1508 1821 3135 5574 4287 3244 . 2355 1421 1859 1697 2401 2411 

Brule y N N TMA 242 255 483 921 879 484 349 274 308 417 464 467 

Thornappla y y y OS 838 678 2249 4230 3064 1328 986 784 2936 2949 1659 1111 

Crowley y N y 

A3.1·7 DPC 1993 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July. 1993 Draft 

E. Watar ulllity Data Available F. Average Monthly river Flow lcle) During Study 

El E2 E3 Fl F2 F3 F4 F5 F& F7 F8 F9 FlO F11 F12 F13 

£ 

iE 

Z' 

Z' 1 iE E c 'i 'i ~ I During .. Q 

c .,; ·i .. SlnlJiing 

'iii .,; Q IDSior .... 0 

j i i Total 

J .f 31: Monthly .... .... .... 

i 1 1 1 Avg Iii r; l .. .. II: :IE :IE :IE ITMAI i ~ :IE ..t :IE !i '!I ! tl .., .., .., Q :f Q • 

Station 26 1990 N N N TMA 3152 7376 3981 5367 3645 1519 971 679 1052 4085 

Station 26 1989 N N N TMA 5844 2143 722 1037 1148 1855 741 

A3.1-9 OPC t993 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 Draft 

G. Average Plant Flow lclsl During Study 

Gl G2 G3 G4 G5 G8 G7 GB G9 GlO Gll G12 G13 

< 

~ 

E 

.... 

1 

:::& 

l! 

~ 

;; 

fij 

e 

.r 

J l 

i I!' li .i '0::: i ;! Iii i !i "!J 1 tl .! u 

ill: ~ .., :::& :::E .., .., . c:> Cl 

Upper 

Lower 

Pixley 

Rothschild 

Wisconsin River Division DS NS NS 2300 2129 2087 2350 2280 2287 3140 2138 NS 

Centralia DS 3602 3641 3605 3675 3650 3538 3338 3108 2823 3010 3474 3560 

Shawano 

Kina Mill TMA 811 882 848 688 887 852 872 836 

991slands 

Gaston Shoals 

Saluda 

Holliday's Bridge 

Buzzard's Roost 

Abbeville 

Hawk's Nest 8930 8685 8908 9034 8446 4906 3810 5251 5498 7723 7447 5511 

Dam #4 (1996) DS 1086 1095 1093 1047 969 916 

Dam#4(19921 DS 1171 1480 1445 1030 662 670 668 656 654 644 662 

Millville91 DS 627 646 233 1328 1168 525 675 570 471 243 238 436 

Millville 90 DS 1275 1394 1366 1346 1318 1092 900 432 BOO 

Millville 89 DS 1162 1569 1311 1115' 

Millville 86 DS 715 287 313 265 

Greenup L+D DS 35375 34175 35400 

Beaver Falls DS 1285 1517 1870 1273 793 2290 2574 I 

Youghiogheny DS 605 516 597 1430 429 396 370 491 559 410 420 4801 

A3.1-11 OPC 1993 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthfv and Annual Entrainment Rata b S11_ecles 

HI H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 HB HB HID HII Hl2 H13 H14 HIS HIS H17 HIS HIS H20 

l i! 

&i ·! 

] !! 

... .¥l 

! .. 

a: '! 0 a- .. 'D t! .. -: 

.; 1!. :::1 -: .. j! .. .. ~ .. >- u -: :a ... :z:: ;§ c c :::1 .. :::1 i Is I = .. j! = .s 

I l!! l!! zs::; i 'ii 'ii 1ii • i:lS '! :::1 :::1 .. .. ~ z i:lS ..c c: c: ... II .. t! c: .:i! z ... li 5 co: II 

c . I! 'I !il 'i - a '! '! • l .. _!_ il :i ,:. ~ -~ ... ti .. H ~ -= ~ .ll .z .. t! ,e. "" "' :I! ... ... :I! C> z c rn 

Alcona N Rock bass 5.1 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 1.90 2.64 7.00 1.28 2.59 0.94 0.00 0.00 2.72 23844 26.5 

Alcona N White sucker 14.9 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 19345 21.5 

Alcona N White sucker 11.1 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 1.01 0.00 

Alcona N Blue _gill 6.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 0.38 1.92 1.41 0.00 0.34 0.00 1.27 11157 12.4 

Alcona N Walleie 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.85 0.63 0.44 1.16 0.64 0.00 1.25 0.00 0.00 1.10 9628 10.7 

Alcona N Yellow parch 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.30 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.67 0.00 0.99 8638 9.6 

Alcona N Spottailahinar 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.78 0.00 1.36 0.38 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 5039 5.6 

Alcona N Smallmouth bass 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 3509 3.9 

Alcona N Black crappie 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.17 1530 1.7 

Alcona N Sandshinar 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 1530 1.7 

Alcona N Rainbow trout 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 1530 1.7 

Alcona N Log parch 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 990 1.1 

Alcona N Brook stickleback 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 990 1.1 

Alcona N 4 other app 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 2249 2.5 

Alcona N ln-1771 TOTAL 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.19 3.16 9.68 8.94 4.79 5.41 2.82 2.35 0.00 5.26 46074 100.0 

Alcona HA (bast estinata) TOTAL 100 10.27 89977 

Foote N White sucker 17.6 100 0.00 0.35 0.00 18.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.62 75532 48.8 

Foota N Wall~ 19.4 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.53 30956 20.0 

Foote N Smallmouth bass 10.8 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 5.76 0.00 0.00 1.96 17180 11.1 

Foote N Rock bass 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 2.44 0.77 0.00 0.00 1.18 10370 6.7 

Foota N Black crappie 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.27 0.48 4179 2.7 

Foote N Channel catfish 100 0.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 3405 2.2 

-- _ _}l)ote N ---~owpa~ - 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 .~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2631 1.7 

A3.1·13 OPC1113 
FERC entrainment raviaw database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Species 

Hl H2 H3 H4 H5 HS H7 HB H9 HlO Hll Hl2 H13 Hl4 H15 HIS Hl7 HIS Hl9 H20 

J .... 

.. ii c 

] 1 -~ 

.fi 

! .. 

a: li .. l: .. u 1 ""' .... .. .. '" 1i .. -e c3 _g 1! .. > ""' :a ... ::c :§ c: i '" 5 '" I ~ I!! .. _g .s 

~ ll ll li;: i "il "il 1i .. i'15 li '" '" ~ z i'15 ... c c "- z II .. " {!. 5 .:f .:f ·I ... .. .Iii l E .. i li "! = 

'il 0 ~ i! - !- ~ E 1i. t; .. .. il -~ .. li ~ 0 .. ... li;: CID en :1! ..,.. ... :1! "" z c en 

loud N Smalhnouth bass 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.25 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 7964 4.9 

loud N log parch 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.61 5363 3.3 

loud N Pirate parch 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2600 1.6 

loud N Carp tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2600 t.6 

loud N Creak chub tOO 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2600 t.6 

loud N Spollail shiner tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2600 1.6 

loud N Yellow parch tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2600 t.6 

loud N UID tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2600 t.6 

loud N (n-611 TOTAL tOO t.t7 0.00 0.00 0.55 1.93 3.88 5.t4 3.93 2.96 2.69 0.00 0.00 t.87 t638t tOO.O 

loud HA (bast estimate) TOTAL tOO t8.55 162526 

Mio N Smallmouth bass 7.4 tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.t2 1.20 0.00 6.27 3.29 0.60 0.00 0.00 3.83 33570 27.9 

Mio N Rock bass 5.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 l.Ot t.23 2.22 3.29 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.86 23343 19.4 

Mio N Walleye 100 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 3.13 1.81 2.tt 0.52 0.30 0.60 0.22 0.40 2.18 19132 15.9 

Mio N White sucker tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0t 0.20 0.17 0.13 O.t5 3.19 3.42 0.40 2.t8 t9132 15.9 

Mio N Bluegill tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 1.76 0.9t 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 9866 8.2 

Mio N Yellow parch 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.20 O.t7 0.39 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.37 3249 2.7 

Mio N G aldan radhorse tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.23 2045 1.7 

Mio N Lake whitefish 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 O.t9 1685 1.4 

Mio N 13 otharcpp 100 0.00 0.27 0.00 2.06 1.59 0.6t 0.36 0.66 2.24 O.t6 0.44 0.00 0.92 8062 6.7 

Mio N ' (n-2941 TOTAL tOO 0.00 0.53 0.00 8.32 8.29 5.63 5.80 tl.tO 8.38 5.98 4.06 1.19 4.34 38041 100.0 

Mio HA (bast estimate) TOTAL 100 t3.74 120323 

Five Channels N Rock bass 5.2 tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 0.00 3.00 0.00 5.80 0.40 0.00 0.00 16.23 142160 33.3 

Fiva Cha~nels L_~ Smalhnouth b!S! '---8.0 tOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t0.58 92839 21.7 

A3.1·15 OPC1H3 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Species 

HI H2 H3 H4 HS H6 H7 HB H9 HIO HII Hl2 Hl3 H14 HIS H16 H17 HIS HIS H20 

"! il 

ii •! ] !! 

... .D 

! .. 

a: '! .. it- .. Iii ·a -; .... .. It :::0 "ii .. -1:1 .. _g I .. >- ... -; :2 ... :a:: ;§ c i :::0 .. :::0 ll 

:; _g !E .s I! Ill ~ .... li: Ci Ci I • .. ll5 Ill '! l :::0 :::0 .. ~ z ll5 ..c: .. .. .... z -I t .. ~ 5 .:i .:i II 

i: .I! j I ~ 

~ il li a '! '! 1 J- i:' 11 ... tl .. .. Ill ~ ]i .= .X 0 0 0 II: al en ..,.. ... ::E ::E 0 z "' "' 

Croton N 15 other spp 100 1.21 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.52 0.33 1.26 0.90 0.55 0.91 1.69 0.35 1.00 8790 4.0 

Croton N ln-8511TOTAL 100 4.22 0.00 1.77 6.43 34.95 32.06 19.84 31.96 26.04 19.79 20.57 3.11 17.00 148969 100.0 

Croton HA (bast estimate) TOTAL 100 25.09 219761 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTR)All N Black crappie 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.71 1.12 0.29 0.21 1.27 2.11 0.98 0.02 0.00 0.69 6035 10.8 

Roaars IPFTR&FFTRIAll N Yellow parch 100 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.36 2.02 0.00 0.64 5843 10.1 

Roaers (PFTR&FFTR)All N Shorthaad redhorse 10.1 100 0.00 0.00 5.79 0.00 1.25 0.13 1.48 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 4838 8.3 

Rogers IPFTR&FFTRIALL N Fathead minnow 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 4135 7.4 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Smallrnouth bass 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.94 0.97 0.00 0.31 0.36 0.02 0.00 0.43 3800 6.8 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Walleye 100 0.00 0.00 0.83 1.53 0.73 0.77 0.71 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.49 0.42 3688 6.6 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Chinook samon 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.77 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 3464 8.2 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Bluegill 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.54 0.16 0.14 1.44 0.86 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.38 3353 8.0 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N White sucker 100 0.00 0.00 3.30 0.31 0.95 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.05 0.44 0.29 0.00 0.32 2794 5.0 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N lctalurus spp 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.31 2682 4.8 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Spottal shiner 100 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.31 1.75 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.30 2628 4.7 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Rock bass 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.53 0.73 0.28 0.07 0.17 0.26 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.28 2235 4.0 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Brown bullhead 100 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.31 1.02 0.10 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 1876 3.0 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N Moxostoma spp 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.85 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 1878 3.0 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTR)All N Chestnut lamprey 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 1173 2.1 

Rogers IPFTR&FFTR)All N P1111pkincaad 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 2.59 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 1081 1.9 

Rogers IPFTR&FFTRIALL N Brook stickleback 100 0.26 0.00 3.30 0.31 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 559 1.0 

Rogers (PFTR&FFTRIALL N 26 other spp 100 0.26 0.00 4.09 3.08 1.04 0.23 0.25 0.76 0.81 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.52 4528 8.1 

Rogers IPFTR&FFTRIALL N (n-10801 TOTAL 100 0.53 0.00 20.25 11.31 18.81 4.79 4.84 3.99 4.53 4.36 2.35 0.49 6.38 55875 100.0 

------~~~--

A3.1-17 OPC1813 
FERC entraimnent review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July , 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Speciet 

Hl H2 H3 H4 H5 HS H7 HB H9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H18 H17 H18 H19 H20 

1! 11 

~ .5 

ii I! 

... .E -~ .. 

a: ]! 

8 ~ {!. .. 'tl "$ 0 1!. "i -:; .a .. .8 1! .. ... u -e a ... :c "E" "E" i: :::1 .. :::1 i l; ll = = .. .8 !5. .s 

I! :a :a a: l a; .... '1ii :.! lZ ]! :::1 :::1 .. ~ .. lZ c: c: ... 

I t {!. .c c: z .a i .. <C II 

i .1!1 1i -:; !5. s. ]! ~ l • ~ i! lii !- i ~ ~ I ti .. ~ a: ... ~ :E .,. ... :E cZ 0 :i C> 0 Cl) 

Roll_ers IPFTR)unita 3 +4 N Rockban 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.20 1787 5.8 

Roaera IPFTR)unita 3 +4 N Yellow perch 50 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.22 0.00 0.13 1140 3.7 

Roaars (PFTR)units 3 +4 N Brook stickleback 50 0.00 0.00 1.99 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 1140 3.7 

Ro11_erc (PFTR)unita 3 +4 N UID sunfish 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 988 3.2 

Roaers (PFTR)units 3 +4 N White sucker 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.11 986 3.21 

Rogers (PFTR)units 3 +4 N Smallmouth bacs 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.09 801 2.6 

Rogers (PFTR)unita 3 +4 N Brown trout 50 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 801 2.6 

Rogers (PFTR)unita 3 +4 N UID 50 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.18 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.09 801 2.6 

Rogers (PFTR)units 3 +4 N Shorthead redhorse 50 0.00 0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 647 2.1 

Rogers (PFTR)unita 3 +4 N 16 otherspJl 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.80 8995 22.71 

Roaerc (PFTR)units 3 +4 N ln-1891 TOTAL 50 0.00 0.00 5.99 9.18 11.65 2.52 3.03 1.87 2.69 4.24 0.22 0.49 3.52 30816 100.01 

Hardy N Yellow perch 3-9. 100 0.76 0.52 5.70 4.68 3.59 17.15 11.96 43.20 0.25 1.10 6.23 1.63 1.10 9652 37.2! 

Hardy N Walleye 15.0 100 0.31 0.00 3.81 8.66 4.97 1.94 1.81 0.35 2.30 1.32 1.62 0.33 0.59 5138 19.8 

Hardy N White sucker 18.8 100 0.00 0.52 2.85 5.88 4.42 0.77 0.64 1.40 1.29 2.20 0.20 0.00 0.42 3710 14.31 

Hardy N Spottailshiner 100 0.61 0.52 6.88 0.47 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.22 4.83 0.97 0.28 9413 9.3 

Hardy N Black crappie 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.74 0.64 0.00 1.29 0.88 5.22 0.33 0.28 9413 9.3 

Hardy N UID 100 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.44 1.40 0.00 0.08 701 2.7 

Hardy N Bluaaill 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.32 1.74 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 493 1.9 

Hardy N Smallmouth bass 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.04 363 1i 

Hardy N Notropis spp 100 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.04 311 1.2 

Hardy N Rock bacs 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.20 0.00 0.03 259 1.0 

Hardy N 8 other IPP 100 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.23 0.28 0.77 0.00 0.35 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.05 467 1.8 

Hardy N (n-4841 TOTAL 100 1.82 1.56 22.78 20.62 13.83 23.40 16.78 8.04 6.66 _7.~ _19.70 L_5.21 12.40 108611 _1()_0,0 

A3.1-19 DtCIIt3 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Soecias 

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H8 H7 HB H9 HID HII H12 H13 H14 H15 H18 H17 HIS H19 H20 

J ... .. ii -~ ] !! 

.... .fi 

g .. IIC '! a a- .. .. ·a ..:- .... .. 

a 1!. "' -5 _g ..:-

.. -

0 

.. 1! .. ' > u ..:- 2 ii ::1: 'i! 'i! i "' .. "' l; 2! ... ... _g !S .s ii 

2! = l!l II: i. "'i "'i ~ l .. f)$ 

~ z '! "' "' f)$ .c c:: c:: .. II .. {! Ji c:: z ... J 5 ... ll' 

~ . II 'i s ~ '! '! • ~ j! • :=- 11 it 1i ~ 1 10. ti .. H .= .X 0 0 {! co "' ;ott ::E ::E C> z C> 

Moores Park Supplement N TOTAL 50 19.50 

Tower N Blacklide darter 3.0 50 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.69 6059 20.0 

Tower N Rock bass 4.2 50 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.97 0.66 0.24 0.54 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.66 5817 19.2 

Tower N Brown bullhead 7.5 50 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.04 1.67 1.18 0.52 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.59 5180 17.1 

Tower N Blueaill 4.4 50 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.93 0.65 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.25 2212 7.3 

Tower N Common shiner 3.4 50 0.10 <.1 1.39 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.23 0.00 0.25 2181 7.2 

Tower N White sucker 5.6 50 0.12 <.1 1.70 0.04 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.04 0.12 0.00 0.25 2181 7.2 

Tower N Pumpkins11d 3.8 50 0.13 1182 3.9 

Tower N Fathead minnow 50 0.09 788 2.6 

Tower N Loaoarch 3.4 50 0.08 666 2.2 

Tower N Rainbow darter 2.2 50 0.08 666 2.2 

Tower N Northern pika 20.5 50 0.00 0.00 <.1 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 <.1 0.00 0.06 485 1.6 

Tower N Central mucM!innow 3.4 50 0.05 454 1.5! 

Tower N Blacknosa daca 50 0.04 394 1.31 

Tower N Brook trout 8.0 50 <.1 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.04 394 1.3 

Tower N Northern redballv daca 50 0.04 394 1.3 

Tower N 12 other spp 50 0.13 1121 3.7 

Tower N ln-9051 TOTAL 2.8 50 0.45 0.17 11.35 1.35 7.36 2.49 0.89 0.67 1.76 1.08 0.17 3.08 99.61 

Tower HA (best estinata) TOTAL 2.7 50 3.40 30295 I 

Tower Supplement N Blackside darter 50 6.07 I 

Tower Supplement N Rock ban 50 1.00 I 

Tower Supplement N __ Comma"..!.!!!!!!! 50 0.31 

A3.1·21 ore 1983 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July , 1993 

H. Monthlv and Annual Entrainment Rate b Species 

HI H2 H3 H4 H5 HB H7 HB H9 HIO H11 Hl2 Hl3 Hl4 Hl5 HIS H17 HIS HIS H20 

l! II 

li c 

1i I. "! 

·~ .. Ji a: :e u 

0 

·a 

~ .., ~ .. 

~ a. ::0 .., ~ i! .. ~ 1! .. ,.. .., a ... X :§: ;g ~ ::0 !E. ::0 .\'! 

:s ~ .. i! .s ! I Ji =s II: i. .. .. 1D a ::0 ::0 z ti5 I! ~ .... ~ .. .<: z I ... Iii ~ .. coc II .It j i ~ I 1i ~ - .t i f 'S. .. il .. s 1 l. ;! .. ~ lj .,; u 0 co ::E ..,.. ::E 0 z 0 ~ ~ rn 

Buchanan N Rainbow trout 8.8 100 0.50 4811 6.9 

Buchanan N Spotfin shiner 100 0.50 4384 6.3 

Buchanan N Minic shinar 100 0.50 4242 6.1 

Buchanan N Loaparch 2.7 100 0.36 3188 4.6 

Buchanan N Unid Moxostorna 100 0.40 3197 4.6 

Buchanan N Stonecat 100 0.20 t954 2.8 

Buchanan N Sand shiner 100 0.20 1727 2.5 

Buchanan N 53 other app 100 2.50 21789 31.1 

Buchanan N (n-30991 TOTAL 100 8.00 70006 100.0 

Constantina N Mimic shiner 1.9 100 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.40 1.60 39.10 0.29 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.27 0.27 3.82 31711 67.1 

Constantine N Log parch 2.3 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 1.40 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 2836 6.0 

Constantine N Bluegill 3.4 100 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.61 0.10 0.28 0.15 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.18 0.19 1654 3.5 

Constantine N Sand shiner 1.9 100 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.18 1607 3.4 

Constantine N Bluntnose minnow 1.9 100 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.10 898 1.9 

Constantine N Largemouth bass 1.6 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 331 0.7 

Constantine N 17 otherspp 100 0.99 0.99 0.99 2.29 0.20 0.90 2.10 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.99 0.99 0.35 3025 6.4 

Constantine N (n-8301 TOTAL 100 1.64 1.84 1.64 5.60 3.30 42.80 4.20 0.00 0.68 0.68 1.64 1.64 5.39 47259 100.0 

Prickett N Bluegill 2.2 50 3.80 3.82 3.82 3.82 8.68 8.47 1.06 0.21 0.88 2.94 1.07 3.82 6.00 52538 45.3 

Prickett N Black crappie 2.7 50 <.1 <.1 <.1 35.71 0.73 0.74 1.22 1.24 0.40 0.58 1.29 <.1 5.28 46276 39.9 

Prickett N Common shinar 3.3 50 0.49 4291 3.7 

Prickett N Rock bass 5.3 50 0.24 2088 1.8 

Prickett N Log perch 3.3 50 0.21 1856 1.6 

A3.1·23 DPCI813 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b S~let 

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 HB H9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 HIS H20 

J ll 

ii 

j l I 

! .. 

a: a 0 ~ .. Ill l -: ..... .. " -: .. 1! .. -6 .. I .. >- u '$ 21 ... ::c g c: .. "' j 0: 1! !S .s a I ... .. ~ Jj = a: l iii iii 1ii .. .. "' "' .. z t7.i c: c: ... z .. ..c: z - II ~ ~ I ~ ~ .. II 

c: .II l ~ !S 

II > a a a 1 ~ ;!! ;;; J. ~ "' tl .. .. if ~ li "' .X ~ .. a: co iE :E :olt :E c C> C> ~ (I) 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Brown bullhead 100 0.13 1110 5.1 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Walleye 6.0 100 0.09 627 3.8 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Yellow perch 6.0 100 0.09 605 3.7 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Fathead minnow 4.0 100 0.09 762 3.5 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Golden shiner 4.0 100 0.08 740 3.4 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Creak chub 4.0 100 0.08 '675 3.1 

Escanaba Dam 3 N White sucker 100 0.08 675 3.1 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Rosyfaca shiner 4.0 100 0.06 522 2.4 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Bluntnose minnow 4.0 100 0.05 435 2.0 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Sand shiner 4.0 100 0.04 370 1.7 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Northern pika 100 0.03 305 1.4 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Longnosa sucker 100 0.03 261 1.2 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Smallmouth bass 100 0.02 218 1.0 

Escanaba Dam 3 N Blacknose shiner 4.0 100 0.02 218 1.0 

Escanaba Dam 3 N 15 otharspp 100 0.13 1175 5.4 

Escanaba Dam 3 N (n-16151 TOTAL 100 0.20 0.10 0.20 11.60 4.90 5.60 1.40 0.70 0.60 1.90 2.40 0.20 2.48 21762 100.0 

French Landing N Black crappie 6.1 100 138.10 1209346 75.9 

French Landing N Bluegill 5.3 100 32.20 282022 17.7 

French Landing N Pumpkincaad 5.4 100 2.90 25493 1.6 

French Landill[ N Gizzard shad 8.9 100 2.20 19120 1.2 

French Landing N TOTAL 100 20.00 282.50 75.00 774.40 425.60 610.20 264.20 61.40 181.90 1593342 

French Landing N TOTAL 100 121.40 

A3.1·25 ore 1111 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rata b Species 

Hl H2 H3 H4 H5 H& H7 HB HB HlO Hll H12 H13 H14 H15 H18 H17 H18 H19 H20 

1 11 

i .5 

j II I! 

a .fi 

i .. 

a: '! .. 

0 ~ ~ l .. 'C 

.; :::0 'C 1i 

~ .. lJ 1 .. >- -e ... ::J: ;: ;: ..., :::0 !E l! 

;; I ... ... .. _g .s ~ I 1!1 1!1 li: i ii ii T.i .. ~ '! :::0 :::0 .. z ~ c: c: .... :1 i!. II .. c: ~ ... .:i .:i 0> II ..., .II 5 l I! i 1i .... '! '! l • .. ~ il :i J i: ~ 0> u ~ .. ¥ ~ lj a cZ a a a lL co IE :1! lilt ... :1! C> z Cl (I) 

Park Mill both 26 other spp 100 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.10 0.61 2.00 0.13 0.30 0.14 0.77 0.35 0.00 31.9 

Park Mill both ln-19521 TOTAL 100 0.42 0.42 0.98 4.26 4.39 25.12 13.47 5.05 6.83 4.52 0.85 0.42 5.56 48735 

Park Mill HA (best estimate) TOTAL 100 0.00 0.01 0.04 14.40 6.80 17.60 4.60 7.30 11.40 0.19 1.19 0.58 5.31 46138 

White Rapids N Common shiner 3.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.43 0.01 36.98 4.12 0.48 4.67 0.11 0.00 4.23 37028 25.8 

White Rapids N Bluenill 2.8 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.14 0.09 0.38 8.37 8.51 10.19 1.04 0.00 2.26 111783 13.7 

White Rapids N Black crappie 3.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.30 0.02 0.03 0.69 10.50 3.86 4.88 1.90 0.00 1.87 16403 11.3 

White Rapids N Yellow parch 2.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.17 0.04 0.98 11.91 0.79 1.54 5.48 0.52 0.00 1.81 15885 11.0 

White Rapids N Walleye 2.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.10 17.23 2.33 0.29 0.19 1.37 0.00 0.00 1.78 15582 10.8 

White Rapids N Emerald chiner 2.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.11 0.08 14.27 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 11904 8.2 

White Rapids N Black bullhead 9.5 100 0.00 0.00 1.14 1.83 1.54 2.30 0.69 2.20 1.49 0.68 0.28 0.00 1.02 8904 6.2 

White Rapids N Log perch 4.3 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.22 0.64 2.91 0.73 0.72 1.19 0.01 0.00 0.55 4851 3.4 

White Rapids N Moxoctomacpp 7.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.17 1457 1.0 

White Rapids N Smallmouth ban 4.3 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.75 0.45 0.42 0.94 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.30 2626 1.8 

White Rapids N Shorthead redhorse 7.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.08 0.00 0.12 1092 0.8 

White Rapids N Rock bass 4.3 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.12 1089 0.8 

White Rapids N Silver redhorsa 6.7 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.13 1163 0.8 

White Rapids N Laraemouth bass 4.3 100 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.75 0.07 0.00 0.08 662 0.5 

White Rapids N 29 other cpp 100 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.77 2.98 1.83 0.75 0.36 0.85 0.29 0.70 0.00 0.70 6125 4.2 

White Rapids N (bast estimate! ln-48331 TOTAL 100 0.00 0.00 1.43 3.85 9.22 25.01 71.45 27.08 18.66 34.58 4.70 0.00 16.50 144554 

White Rapids HA TOTAL 100 8.52 0.00 0.29 0.92 1.44 1.17 0.37 5.73 1.19 18.50 2.87 1.88 5.92 51898 

Brule N Yellow parch 1.2 100 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.62 1.70 11.60 8.20 0.12 0.20 1.60 0.66 0.00 2.07 18161 43.3 

Brule N Walleye 3.5 100 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.19 1.10 0.25 _!.!J() 0.63 0.26 1.20 0.11 0.00 0.74 6476 15.5 

A3.1·27 DICIHJ 
FERC entrainment review database praparad by Stone and Wabstar Envirorvnantal Technology and Sarvicas, July , 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entralnmant Rate b Species 

HI H2 H3 H4 HS HB H7 HB H9 HIO HII Hl2 Hl3 H14 HIS HI& H17 HIS HIS H20 

I 11 

.5 

j ! ~ ... Jj 

! .. 

"" ]! 0 l: u {! l .. ~ 

~ " ~ 1; _g .. .. ~ .. >- <.> ~ 

~ ... :J: c: c: i " " I ~ l!l ... ... _g !E .5 0 I!! .. IE: i. 

= 1& l!l • .. 

z l:l5 a '! " .. c: c: ... !!!;. I .. 0 z ""' Ji Ji i! li .... .. &l 

l: .I! 'I 'i 1; !E ... a ]! ]! • 'I .. ~ il i la. ~ I tl .. .. .. .. H :ii eX 0 IE: .{!. {!. "" .,. c :I! #. ... c :::E 0 z 0 Cl) 

Crowley Both Yellow parch 5.5 100 <.1 0.00 0.10 10.30 0.50 0.90 1.30 0.20 0.70 0.30 0.10 0.00 1.19 10417 15.6 

Crowlay Both Black crappie 100 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.50 <.1 <.1 0.20 0.70 1.80 1.80 0.10 0.10 0.43 3801 5.7 

Crowley Both Blacksida darter 3.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 3238 4.8 

Crowley Both Black bullhead 2.5 100 <.1 0.10 0.20 0.80 0.30 0.10 1.80 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.10 0.36 3158 4.7 

Crowley Both White sucker 7.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.20 1.00 0.30 0.00 0.80 0.00 <.1 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.21 1844 2.8 

Crowley Both Yellow bullhead 4.5 100 0.10 <.1 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.30 0.10 0.30 0.80 0.10 0.18 1556 2.3 

Crowley Both Largemouth bass 1.5/8.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 <.1 0.40 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 1318 2.0 

Crowley Both Johnny darter 2.5 100 0.00 0.00 <.1 0.10 1.40 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 1139 1.7 

Crowley Both Smallmouth bass 2.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.20 0.50 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 1088 1.61 

Crowley Both Brook stickleback 1.5/5.5 100 0.00 0.00 <.1 0.80 0.40 0.00 <.1 0.00 0.10 <.1 0.10 0.00 0.11 923 1.41 

Crowley Both Brassy minnow 2.5 100 0.00 0.00 <.1 0.00 0.70 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 603 0.9 

Crowley Both 25 other spp 100 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.50 0.90 0.40 1.20 0.50 .. 4 0.30 0.40 0.10 3914 

(estimate used) Crowley Both (n-5920) TOTAL 100 0.50 0.50 0.90 14.80 9.40 18.30 34.50 2.60 4.80 4.90 1.70 0.50 7.60 66920 

Crowley HA TOTAL 100 0.50 0.60 2.80 15.50 13.20 4.50 7.70 4.00 6.10 27.20 7.70 8.70 7.90 69239 

I 

Upper HA TOTAL 100 8.70 1.80 9.10 20.90 14.70 7.10 10.10 6.10 5.80 4.90 3.80 3.10 6.40 55779 

Lower HA TOTAL 100 13.60 3.00 7.80 7.60 2.60 2.00 11.60 7.50 26.20 23.70 22.80 11.50 11.80 104046 

Pixley HA TOTAL 100 2.80 1.70 2.20 0.60 2.20 1.70 5.80 8.70 3.90 40.50 2.90 3.10 5.60 48870 ! 

! 

Rothschild N Black crappie 3.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 7.10 33.40 14.00 7.70 0.50 0.50 0.20 11.80 103013 48.4 

Rothschild N Bluegill 2.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 <.01 1.00 2.10 10.70 7.70 2.60 9.60 0.30 0.40 4.30 37504 17.6 

Rothschild N Northern logparch 3.0 100 1.70 14912 7.0 - --

A3.1·29 ore 1113 
FERC entrainment review database prepered by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Species 

HI H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 HB H9 HlO Hit Ht2 H13 Ht4 H15 Ht6 Ht7 HIS Hl9 H20 

'! l! 

ii c: 

j u 'i! 

a .jj 

! .. 

ac: 

0 ~ u ~ {! .. 'D "<= 

.; I. " "ii 0 .. ..!! ! .. ... u 'C :i! ... ::c i: i i j .. " i I; I = !5 .s 

~ l!l l!l a: i ;;; ;;; ,. ;,s l " " .. ~ z tiS c: c: .. .. .c: "- z .:i! .:i! l I c: .. u . II .. !5 i II ~ 0 ~ il - .t i;' ~ i 'S. t; ... H ~ ~ .. l ]j .z 0 0 0 a: Ill fl) aft ... ::IE ::IE 0 z c fl) 

Centralia N Black crappie 2.1 100 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.00 0.00 1.10 8.80 5.30 1.60 1.20 1.20 1.80 15480 1.9 

Centralia N White crappie <1.5 100 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 5.20 7.10 0.80 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.20 1.20 10472 1.3 

Centralia N Black bullhead >8 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 2.30 1.10 3.70 0.90 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.70 6398 0.8 

Centralia N 24 other spp 100 0.70 0.70 0.70 4.00 1.80 8.30 3.70 1.20 0.60 2.00 0.20 0.20 2.00 17669 4.1 

Centralia N (n- 25101 TOTAL 100 8.80 8.80 8.80 38.70 14.90 37.60 672.20 154.40 66.80 33.60 41.9 41.90 95.20 834377 

Shawano N Black Crappie 4.9 100 0.20 NS 3.10 4.30 0.10 1.30 0.20 0.00 0.10 <.1 0.40 0.20 0.79 6922 17.0 

Shawano N Bluegill 4.9 100 0.10 NS 0.1 0.30 0.00 6.00 0.20 0.30 1.10 <.1 0.10 0.10 0.67 5864 14.4 

Shawano N P1111pkins11d 5.9 100 <.1 NS <.1 1.50 0.40 1.30 0.20 0.30 0.50 <.1 <.1 0.10 0.35 3054 7.5 

Shawano N Rock bass 5.9 100 0 NS <.1 0.3 0.5 1.3 0.6 0.6 1.5 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.34 3013 7.4 

Shawano N Largemouth bass 2.0 100 0.00 NS 0.00 0.10 0.20 1.80 1.50 <.1 0.60 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.34 2972 7.3 

Shawano N White sucker 7.9 100 0.00 NS 0.00 0.20 0.30 1.80 0.40 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.10 0.10 0.24 2077 5.1 

Shawano N Brassy minnow 3.0 100 0.00 NS 0.00 0.30 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 <.1 <.1 0.10 0.10 0.22 1955 4.8 

Shawano N Black bullhead 7.9 100 0.10 NS 0.00 0.20 0.20 1.20 0.10 <.1 0.10 <.1 0.00 <.1 0.15 1344 3.3 

Shawano N Shorthaad redhorse 11.8 100 0.00 NS 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 <.1 <.1 0.10 0.00 0.10 855 2.1 

Shawano N Golden shiner 100 0.00 NS 0.00 0.70 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 <.1 0.10 0.10 855 2.1 

Shawano N Logparch 100 0.00 NS 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.20 0.00 <.1 <.1 0.10 <.1 0.00 0.10 855 2.1 

Shawano N Fathead minnow 3.0 100 0.00 NS 0.00 <.1 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.30 0.10 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.08 733 1.8 

Shawano N Common shiner 100 0.20 NS 0.00 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.50 0.10 <.1 0.08 692 1.7 

Shawano N Rosyfaca shiner 3.0 100 0.00 NS <.1 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.50 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 611 1.5 

Shawano N Smallmouth ban 8.9 100 <.1 NS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 <.1 <.1 0.30 <.1 0.10 <.1 0.07 611 1.5 

Shawano N Tadpole madtom 100 <.1 NS 0.10 0.10 <.1 0.30 0.20 0.00 0.00 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.07 611 1.5 

Shawano N Brown trout 100 0.00 NS 0.00 <.1 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.07 570 1.4 

Shawano N Y allow bullhead 100 <.1 NS 0.00 0.10 <.1 0.10 <.1 0.10 <.1 <.1 0.10 0.00 0.05 448 1.1_ 

A3.1·31 DPC lit! 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Envirorvnental Tachnology and Services, July , 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Speciet I 

HI H2 H3 H4 HS HB H7 HB H9 HIO HII Hl2 Hl3 Hl4 HIS HIS Hl7 HIB Hl9 H20 I 

I 

I 

1 111 

i 

j I !! 

~ ! a: '! 0 l: 0' .. ·a 'C ..... .. I. "' .; .8 'C 

.. -

0 

~ ~ .. > 'C ::2: ... :c ... ;§ i "' 5 "' ls jl ~ ... .8 .s :e II; i "ii "ii 

~ -.; .. i:'l :e '! "' "' .. z i:'l c: c: ... z .. ... z - .:i! .:i! 'I f i {!! .. - ll .I! !S c: II 'il ~ 

~ il ;; li. > 

~ li ! a 1:: .. if '! .. ! -~ :I ~ 0 0 tl) I II; "" tl) :& .... ... :& c 0 z c 

991slands N Bluegill 100 0.42 1.10 0.00 3.70 7.70 10.20 9.80 8.80 4.00 23.80 1.10 0.00 4.03 35342 21.7: 

991slands N Gizzard shad 100 0.84 1.80 4.80 1.90 8.90 5.70 5.30 4.80 0.56 1.00 10.00 0.00 2.47 21661 13.3] 

991slands N Thraadfin shad 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 13.50 3.30 3.10 2.80 3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 13518 8.3, 

991slands N Whita catfish 100 5.90 15.20 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 10261 6.31 

991slands N Stripad jumprock 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.10 0.00 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.19 6.30 3.40 0.00 0.93 8143 5.01 

991slands N Snail bullhaad 100 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.80 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.75 1.80 0.57 0.00 0.76 6'678 4.11 

991slands N Radbraast sunfish 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 1.70 1.60 1.40 0.19 2.80 3.20 0.00 0.69 6026 3.7] 

991slands N Smallfin radhorsa 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 4397 2.7 

991slands N Whitefin shiner 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 3094 1.9] 

991slands N Spottailshiner 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 1.50 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 2606 1.61 

991slends N Black crappie 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 1.10 0.00 0.26 2280 1.41 

991slands N Shorthead redhorse 100 0.42 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 1629 tol 

991slands N Blueback harring 100 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 1629 1.0 

991slands N 16 othar spp 100 1.72 4.40 0.00 3.32 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 3.20 2.46 0.00 5.2 

991slands N TOTAL 100 28.70 73.40 10.00 23.80 41.50 25.94 24.20 21.80 12.20 46.20 22.40 0.00 27.20 238447 100.0! 

991slands HA (bast estimata) TOTAL 100 1.70 2.20 18.80 14.70 39.20 21.80 11.10 24.80 13.80 35.50 37.20 1.10 18.60 162868 

Gaston Shoals N Snail bullhaad 100 0.54 0.30 0.00 2.60 0.30 17.00 14.50 13.20 1.40 0.91 0.00 0.48 4.30 37601 24.0 

Gaston Shoals N Bluagill 100 1.60 3.60 0.90 2.70 1.00 3.90 3.30 3.00 4.60 2.90 0.00 0.00 2.30 20411 13.01 

Gaston Shoals N Channa! cat 100 0.81 0.90 0.00 0.30 0.88 5.40 4.60 4.20 5.10 3.30 0.35 0.48 2.20 19209 12.31 

Gaston Shoals N Radbraast sunfish 100 0.27 0.30 1.50 2.70 1.20 7.00 5.90 5.40 0.75 0.54 0.00 0.00 2.10 18743 12.0' 

Gaston Shoals N Stripad jumprock 100 0.27 0.30 0.00 8.70 1.20 0.87 0.74 0.68 0.15 0.36 0.35 0.00 1.10 9830 6.3 

Gaston Shoals N White catfish 100 0.54 0.90 0.00 1.20 0.88 3.50 3.00 2.70 0.15 0.18 0.00 0.00 1.10 9503 6.1 

Gaston Shoals N Brown bullhead 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.90 0.00 1.30 1.10 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 5324 3.4 

A3.1·33 DPCIH3 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July , 1993 

H. Monthlv and Annual Entrainment Rate b Species 

HI H2 H3 H4 H5 HB H7 HB H9 HID HII Hl2 Hl3 Hl4 HIS HIS Hl7 HIB HIS H20 

ll 11 

I .5 

j j .. !!! a: '! 0 ~ .. .. ·a ..:: ... .. 

0 It .. -6 .2 "ii -.. .. 1l u >- u ..:: :a ... :z: -a -a l: "' .. "' Is I! - - • i .2 !E .5 

i .. ll: i "1i "1i I! ~ .. c55 '! "' "' z 1: 1: ,f .. .. z "" .:i .:i ll f 1: ~ .. ll . II .. i II l 'B ~ "1; il ~ !- it ~ l s. t; » i! '! '! l .: .. :ii .X 0 

~ .. ll: ... "' ::E ~ ... ::E ::E C> z Cl "' Saluda N Channel catfish 100 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.46 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 801 1.1 

Saluda N 6 other spp 100 0.09 0.00 0.69 0.24 0.00 2.40 3.62 0.20 0.03 0.23 2038 2.8: 

Saluda N (n-2441 TOTAL 100 16.00 20.70 17.70 10.70 7.00 6.30 26.30 7.10 8.50 87274 100.0 

Saluda HA (best estinatel TOTAL 100 3.30 0.00 2.30 2.70 0.98 1.40 17.80 31.60 9.60 18.30 8.50 2.00 8.31 72798 I 

Holliday's Bridae 1990 N Gizzard shad 100 5.40 3.10 0.00 0.00 1.40 5.00 38.01 

Holliday's Bridaa 1990 N Blueaill 100 0.94 0.00 1.10 4.20 0.71 1.10 20.9. 

Holliday's Bridge 1990 N Whitefin shiner 100 0.00 0.00 0.65 1.90 0.00 0.00 6.7 

Holliday's Bridge 1990 N Channel catfish 100 0.00 0.00 1.80 0.35 0.36 0.00 6.5 

Holliday' Bridae 1990 N Black craooie 100 0.70 0.00 0.22 0.35 0.36 0.69 6.0i 

Holliday' Bridge 1990 N White catfish 100 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.35 0.00 0.00 3.7 

Holliday' Bridge 1990 N Yellow perch 100 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.41 2.91 

Holliday' Bridae 1990 N Redear sunfish 100 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.70 0.00 0.00 2.4 

Holliday' Bridge 1990 N Piedmont darter 100 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.28 1.9 

Holliday' Bridae 1990 N Fiervblack shiner 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 1.8 

Holliday' Bridge 1990 N Redbreast sunfish 100 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.35 0.00 0.00 1.5 

Holliday' Bridge 1990 N Golden shiner 100 0.24 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.4 

Holliday's Bridge 1990 N Sandbar shiner 100 0.24 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.4! 

Holliday's Bridge 1990 N Northern hoasucker 100 0.24 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.4 

Holfiday's Bridae 1990 N Saagreen darter 100 0.24 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.41 

Holliday's Bridae 1990 N Snail bullhead 100 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 1.3 

Holliday's Bridae 1990 N Flat bullhead 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.9' 

Holliday's Bridge 1990 N IN-1111 TOTAL 100 8.90 4.40 5.30 9.30 3.30 7.70 100.0 

Holfiday's Bridge 1990 HA TOTAL 100- 4:1Q~L.... 0.48 - 0.83 ___!.!Q 2.10 5.70 ~ ~~-

A3.1·35 ore 1m 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July , 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Species 

HI H2 H3 H4 H5 HS H7 HB H9 HIO HII Hl2 Hl3 Hl4 H15 HIS H17 Hl9 H19 H20 

'! 1l 

i .e 

1 I !! 

:5 a: li 0 a- .. u 'D -; ..... 

~ "' 1!. "' 'ii 0 .. .2 ~ .. > <.> 'C ! ... ::1: ;g ;: .., "' "' ~ I!! = i .. .2 !E .s 

~ i i iL i "iii "iii .. .. '! "' "' .. z "' "' ... 2; t .£ 

z ~ ~ l .!i {!. .. II .., .I! 0 !E 

I a li li II l I .; ;! ;; ~ it ~ ~ b > .. Ill ~ eX .. {!. {!. IE: co "' ~ ::1! ::1! 0 z 0 "' 

Abbeville N Yellow peJch 4.3 100 3.28 3.28 28.63 7.73 5.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 4.80 22006 44.4 

Abbeville N Blueaill 3.7 100 0.00 0.00 1.15 7.56 23.61 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.21 3.80 14501 29.2 

Abbeville N Threadfin chad 3.4 100 0.32 0.32 1.49 5.78 4.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 2.12 5601 11.3 

Abbeville N Brown bullhead 10.8 100 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.36 5.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.65 0.00 0.89 3757 7.8 

Abbeville N White catfish 4.6 100 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.36 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.54 0.00 0.25 1011 2.0 

Abbeville N All other IPP 100 0.00 0.00 1.18 2.15 1.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.11 2.17 0.00 

Abbeville N (n-6381 TOTAL 100 3.60 3.60 33.80 23.92 42.08 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.16 1.78 1.41 4.90 12.40 49577 100.0 

Hawks Nest both Gizzard shad 2.0 100 0.00 0.75 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.26 3.30 17.90 0.06 1.90 16698 34.6 

Hawks Nest both Gizzard shad >4 100 0.32 0.94 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.17 3.30 7.90 0.30 1.10 9810 20.3 

Hawks Nest both Channel catfish 2.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.90 4.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 8264 17.1 

Hawke Nasi both Channel catfish 6.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.40 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.10 1181 2.4 

Hawks Nasi both Channel catfish 10.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.00 0.25 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 1370 2.8 

Hawks Nasi both Channel catfish >12 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 207 0.4 

Hawks Nasi both Blueaill 3.5 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.30 2937 6.1 

Hawke Nasi both Bluegill >4 100 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.01 0.14 0.13 0.00 0.44 0.46 0.20 1.40 0.00 0.20 2177 4.5 

Hawke Nasi both Hybrid striped bass 6.0 100 0.00 0.56 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.06 0.10 618 1.3 

Hawks Nest both Hybrid striped base 10.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.30 2331 4.8 

Hawks Nest both Smallmouth bm 6.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 1139 2.4 

Hawke Nasi both Rock base 8.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.08 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.10 854 1.8 

Hawke Nasi both 5 other cpp 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.05 0.17 0.00 0.23 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 683 1.5 

Hawks Nest both TOTAL 100 0.32 2.25 1.32 0.14 0.28 2.52 2.07 10.00 6.30 13.00 27.50 0.44 5.50 48269 100.0 

Dam # 4 (19861 N Bluegill 5.7 6.0 50 NS NS NS 0.32 0.42 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.26 0.08 NS NS 22.8 

A3.1·37 DPCII13 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July, 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainment Rate b Spades 

Hl H2 H3 H4 H5 H& H7 HB H9 HlO Hll H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19 H20 

ll i! 

i ·i 

] ! ::: it' .fi ! a: '! 0 ~ .. 

.. 'D ... ~ 0 !. ,. ... 0 -a l! .. .. 

j .. > ... ... 2 ... ::c c c i ,. .. ,. J! 

:s I! ... ... l! !E .5 I .. .. a: i "iii "iii 

~ 1ii .. ~ ~ 11 ,. ,. ~ z .Ill: c c a.. 

II .. z ~ .ll .ll i! Iii .. II 

1: .II l 'il 0 !E > l '! '! ll l .. ~ 11 Iii .f 1i ~ ... 8 ... .. if ~ .. a: .i ~ " ~ "" (I) 2 lilt ... 2 2 Q (I) 

Monthly entrainment N Pumkinseed 5.8 6.0 100 NS 0.00 <.1 <.1 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 137 2.5 

rates represent 30% of N Golden shiner 4.0 4.0 100 NS 0.00 <.1 <.1 0.00 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 61 1.1 

plant capacity but total N Green sunfish 4.6 5.0 100 NS 0.00 <.1 <.1 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 61 1.1 

annual entrainment est. N Spottailshinar 4.1 4.0 100 NS 0.00 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 56 1.0 

is representative N 18 other IJIII 100 NS 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 <.1 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 207 

of100% of flow N TOTAL 100 NS 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.80 0.30 0.60 0.40 0.60 <.1 0.62 5433 

Dam 114 (1992) Monthly entrainment rates represent 30% of plant ca~ acity but totalentrainmant estimate is repr11entativa of 100% of plant flow 

Millville 91 N Redbreast sunfish 7.0 7.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 1.00 3.10 2.90 0.10 1.00 0.70 0.20 <.1 1.35 10776 38.5 

Monthly entrainment N Bluegill 6.7 7.0 100 0.10 <.1 <.1 1.70 1.00 1.60 0.70 0.10 0.90 0.70 <.1 0.00 0.93 7444 26.6 

rates represent 30% of N American eel 31.6 31.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.60 1.40 1.00 0.41 3311 11.8 

Jllant capacity but total N Smallmouth baac 7.6 8.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.60 0.30 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.10 0.00 0.27 2180 7.8 

annual entrainment eat. N Rock bass 6.8 7.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.50 0.20 0.10 <.1 0.20 0.10 <.1 0.00 0.18 1428 5.1 

is representative N Channel catfish 11.4 11.0 100 <.1 <.1 0.00 1.40 0.10 <.1 0.10 <.1 0.10 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.10 779 2.8 

of100% of flow N Pumpkinseed 6.2 8.0 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.20 0.20 <.1 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.08 665 2.4 

Millville 91 N All other spp 100 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.30 2.80 <.1 <.1 1.10 <.1 0.20 <.1 0.18 1383 8.0 

Millville 91 N (n-5321) TOTAL 100 0.24 0.08 <.1 5.10 3.80 8.20 4.10 0.30 3.50 2.40 1.90 1.10 3.50 27986 100.0 

Millville (1991) Monthly entrainment rates represent 29% of plant capacity but totalantrainment estimate is representative of 100% of plant flow 

Millville 90 N Redbreast 8.9 7.0 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.40 <.1 0.00 <.1 NS NS NS 0.00 27.5 

Millvilla 90 N Shorthead radhorse 15.8 16.0 29 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.40 0.70 1.50 0.40 0.40 NS NS NS 0.10 27.5 

Millville 90 N Bluegill 6.5 7.0 29 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.20 0.10 1.00 0.30 0.20 NS NS NS 0.10 16.4 

Millville 90 N Channel catfish 10.6 10.0 29 0.00 <.1 <.1 0.20 0.60 0.70 0.20 0.10 NS NS NS 0.20 13.1 

Millville 90 N Rockbass 8.4 6.0 29 <.1 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.10 <.1 NS NS NS 0.10 3.4 

A3.J.39 ore lltl 
FERC entrairvnent review database prepared by Stone and Webster Envirorvnental Technology and Services, July , 1993 

H. Monthly and Annual Entrainmant Rate b Species 

HI H2 H3 H4 H5 HB H7 HB H9 HIO HII Hl2 Hl3 Hl4 HIS H16 H17 HIB Hl9 H20 

"! il 

I .5 

1i !! 

"1 .. .fi a: li ;!:- .. {!. l .. -; 

~ :::t -; ~ 

~ .. • j .. >- (.) -; ... :z: "E "E i :::t .. :::t 

15 = j J! !S .s. I! 1!1 "" II: 01 01 ! • • l:liJ tl "! l ill :::t .. ~ z .... ~ ... z I & i {!. 5 .1i I ~ .I! I !! ,. a "! ~ l • .. ~ i! ;;; .. :f ~ ll ... t> .. • ~ ~ a ~ .. .. II: co :IE ;It ... :IE C> z c "' 

Millville 88 N Redbreast sunfish 8.0 5.9 29 NS NS NS NS NS 1.50 0.10 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 20.1 

Millville 88 N Channel catfish 9.1 10.2 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.90 0.10 0.10 <.1 0.00 NS NS 17.1 

Millville 88 N Smallmouth bass 8.1 8.3 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.70 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 9.1 

Millville 88 N Common carp 22.2 22.0 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.80 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 NS NS 7.9 

Millville 88 N Yellow bullhead 5.3 4.8 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.20 <.1 0.10 0.00 0.00 NS NS 5.8 

Millville 88 N P1111pkinaeed 5.7 5.7 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.30 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 5.0 

Millville 88 N largemouth bass 10.2 10.6 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.10 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 2.5 

Millville 88 N Shorthead radhorce 13.3 13.0 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.10 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 1.9 

Millville 86 N Rock baas 5.8 5.8 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.10 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 1.8 

Millville 88 N Golden redhorce 14.3 13.7 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.10 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 1.7 

Millville 86 N Margined madtom 3.7 3.7 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.10 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 1.3 

Millville 86 N Green sunfish 8.2 8.1 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.00 <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 NS NS 1.1 

Millville 86 N White crappie 8.3 8.3 29 NS NS NS NS NS <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 0.00 NS NS 1.0 

Millville 86 N 11 other IPP 29 NS NS NS NS NS 0.20 <.1 <.1 <.1 0.00 NS NS 2.8 

Millville 86 N TOTAL 29 NS NS NS NS NS 8.0 0.8 0.4 <.1 <.1 NS NS 

Greenup L+D N Gizzard shad 4.0 33 68.19 0.00 5930.00 94.0 

Greenup L+D N Gizzard shad 11.0 33 18.13 0.00 0.00 

Greenup L+D N Gizzard shad 3.0 33 0.00 1.63 0.00 

Greenup L+D N Gizzard chad 7.0 33 0.00 7.36 0.00 

Greenup L+D N Freshwater dr1111 4.0 33 11.08 0.00 253.10 5.0: 

Greenup L+D N Freshwater dr1111 8.0 33 1.16 0.40 0.00 i 

Greenup L+D N Freshwater drum 11.0 33 3.14 0.00 0.00 : 

Greenup L+D N Freshwater drum 13.0 33 1.16 8.10 -- •--- 0.00 ! 

A3.J.41 ore 1111 
FERC entrainment review database prepared by Stone and Webster Environmental Technology and Services, July , 1993 

H. Monthly_ end Annual Entrainment Rate b S~ciet 

HI H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 HIO Hll Hl2 Hl3 Hl4 H15 Hl6 Hl7 HIS HIS H20 

1 11 

Iii c::: 

j I "i!! 

.. :5 

i "' "!! a- 0 

Ill '!S '$ .... 0 I. "; 0 .1! .. ~ .. -e .. >- u "; J! ... :::c ;: ;g ~ ::t .. ::t a 

!; I - .1! 5 .s ~ I ri a l 1i 1i 

~ l! ::0 ::0 z c::: c::: &! 

t z "" .:1! .:1! II li {!. .. II 

c: .Ill l J j; 5 . a l! l! I l ~ il . .t i:" ~ i tl .. Ill l. .:c .. ~ eX 0 .., (I) '1/t. ... :::E {!! {!! :::E C> z .. (I) 

Station 26 (1989) HA TOTAL 100 8.80 24.60 115.40 55.90 128.70 13.80 0.80 30.79 269727 100.0 

Station 26 (1990) HA TOTAL 100 0.40 3.80 1.50 2.80 9.00 6.80 23.20 38.50 37.30 61.50 

A3.1·43 DI'C 1113 
Appendix 3.2- Narrative Portion of Database. 

Explanatory Comments, Principal Study Conclusions and Agency/ Applicant Comments. 

Project Name: Alcona FERC #: 2447: Au Sable River, MI (8 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Percent composition was based on a total net catch of 177 fish. Fish length data 

are available but not easily summarized for this database. Entrainment numbers were estimated by 

extrapolating the number of fish in the volume of water sampled to the total amount of water that passed 

monthly through the plant. Net catch was adjusted to exclude those fish too wide to fit through the trash 

racks. Entrainment rates derived from partial flow tailrace netting should be used with caution; their 

primaJy intent was to provided species composition and length frequency data for hydroacoustically 

estimated entrainment rates. Monthly hydroacoustic estimates of entrainment not yet presented due to 

sampling periods overlapping months; applicant may be able to provide monthly data. The white suckers 

collected in the spring probably represented downstream-entrained individuals moving into the tailrace to 

spawn. 

The minimum detectable hydroacoustic target size was estimated to be two to three inches long under 

optimal conditions. 

Two partial flow tailrace nets were deployed in each tailrace bay. The mouth of each partial flow tailrace 

net was 1 meter square and 18ft. long with 1 inch square mesh nylon netting. Estimated discharge areal 

coverage of the partial flow nets was 5.0 percent. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Hydroacoustic data indicated that peak entrainment occurred from May to 

August and November-December. (What species were entrained during December is unknown since no fish 

were collected in the net samples. S&W). Forty-one percent of the fish passed through the left-hand side of 

the intakes, 40 percent passed through the right-hand side and 19 percent passed through the center of the 

intakes. 

The relative abundance of fish in Alcona Pond (Table 3-72, Binder 4) was as follows: 

Yellow perch: 28.45% 

Rock bass: 28.17% 

White sucker: 15.12% 

Brown bullhead: 3.88% 

Smallmouth bass: 3.88% 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: Michigan DNR indicated that they have problems with both the 

hydroacoustic and netting sections of this study. Netting probably had significant problems with infiltration, 

net avoidance, and low net efficiency. They believed the netting effort was insufficient to provide reliable 

entrainment estimates. They recommended not using this study in the analysis (letter to D. Hjorth from G. 

Whelan, MDNR, dated April 28, 1993). 

A3.2-1 
Project Name: Cooke FERC #: 2450: Au Sable River, :MI (9 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Percent composition was bas~ on a total net catch of 138 fish .. Fish length data 

was available but not easily summarized for this database. Entrainment numbers were estimated by 

extrapolating the number of fish in the volume of water sampled to the total amount of water that passed 

monthly through the plant. Net catch was adjusted to exclude those fish too wide to fit through the trash 

racks. Entrainment rates derived from partial flow tailrace netting should be used with caution; their 

primary intent was to provide species composition and length frequency data for hydroacoustically estimated 

entrainment rates~ Monthly hydroacoustic estimates of entrainment were not presented in the database due 

to sampling periods overlapping months; Applicant may be able to provide monthly data. 

The minimum detectable hydroacoustic target size was estimated to be 1. 75 inches under optimal 

conditions. 

"Two nets were deployed in the tailrace of each unit. Each net had a 1 meter by 1 meter square mouth and 

was 18 ft. long with 1 inch square mesh nylon netting. Estimated discharge areal coverage of the partial 

flow nets was 6.0 percent. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Hydroacoustic data indicated that peak entrainment occurred in October and 

November. Young-of-the-year yellow perch were most abundant during the fall; yearlings were most 

abundant during the spring. Black crappie that were 3 and 4 year olds were most common in the summer; 

young-of-the-year black crappies were common in the fall. 

The relative abundance of fish in Cooke Pond (Table 3-109, Binder 4) was as follows: 

Emerald Shiner: 31.39% 

Yellow perch: 18.94% 

Pumpkinseed: 8.54% 

Black crappie: 8.29% 

Rock bass: 6.31% 

Spottail shiner: 5. 84% 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: Michigan DNR indicated that they have problems with both the 

hydroacoustic and netting sections of this study. Netting probably had significant problems with infiltration, 

net avoidance, and low net efficiency. They believed the netting effort was insufficient to provide reliable 

entrainment estimates. They recommended not using this study in the analysis (letter to D. Hjorth from G. 

Whelan, MDNR, dated April 28, 1993). 

A3.2-3 
Project Name: Mio FERC #: 2448: Au Sable River, MI (5 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Percent composition was base:d on a total net catch of 294 fish. Fish length data 

was available but not easily summarized for this database. Entrainment numbers were estimated by 

extrapolating the number of fish in the volume of water sampled to the total amount of water that passed 

monthly through the plant. The net catch was adjusted to exclude those fish too wide to fit through the 

trash racks. Entrainment rates derived from partial flow tailrace netting should be used with caution; their 

primary intent was to provide species composition and length frequency data for hydroacoustically estimated 

entrainment rates. Monthly hydroacoustic estimates of entrainment were not presented in the database due 

to sampling periods overlapping months; applicant may be able to provide monthly data. 

The minimum detectable hydroacoustic target size was estimated to be 1. 75 inches under optimal conditions 

and 3-4 inches under less favorable conditions such as periods of high discharge. 

Two nets were deployed in the tailrace of each unit. Each net had a 1 meter by 1 meter square mouth and 

was 18 ft. long with 1 inch square mesh nylon netting. Estimated discharge areal coverage of the partial 

flow nets was 5.0 percent. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Hydroacoustic data showed even distribution of fish across the Unit 1 intake 

but not Unit 2. Only 19 percent of the fish detected entering Unit 2 passed through the center of the intake 

forebay (i.e., most passed through along the sides). Peak entrainment was noted during May and October. 

Smallmouth bass were entrained mostly during the warmer months, ranging in size from 5.1 to 15.9 inches 

(Age 3 to 8). Rock bass peak entrainment was noted in September, whereas young-of-the-year recruitment 

was noted in July. Most rock bass were age 3 to 5. White sucker (age 3 to 5) were mostly collected in the 

fall, and walleye (age 2 to 5) were collected in the spring. 

The relative abundance of fish in Mio Pond (Table 3-57, Binder 4) was as follows: 

White sucker: 20.86% 

Spottail shiner: 16.39% 

Brown bullhead: 12.85% 

Rock bass: 10.06% 

Yellow perch: 6.89% 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: . Michigan DNR indicated that they have problems with both the 

hydroacoustic and netting sections of this study. Netting probably had significant problems with infiltration, 

net avoidance, and low net efficiency. They believed the netting effort was insufficient to provide reliable 

entrainment estimates. They recommended not using this study in the analysis (letter to D. Hjorth from G. 

Whelan, MDNR, dated April 28, 1993). 

A3.2-5 
~~Name: Croton FERC #: 2468: Muskegon River, MI (8.8 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Percent composition was based on a total net catch of 851 fish. Fish length data 

was available but not easily summarized for this database. Entrainment numbers were estimated by 

extrapolating the number of fish in the volume of water sampled to the total amount of water that passed 

monthly through the plant. The net catch was adjusted to exclude those fish too wide to fit through the 

trash racks. The spatial distribution of fish within each turbine bay could not be adequately evaluated by 

using hydroacoustics because of high-turbulence interference. Entrainment rates derived from partial flow 

tailrace netting should be used with caution; their primacy intent was to provide species composition and 

length frequency data for hydroacoustically estimated entrainment rates. Monthly hydroacoustic estimates 

of entrainment were not presented in the database due to sampling periods overlapping months; applicant 

may be able to provide monthly data. 

The minimum detectable hydroacoustic target size was estimated to be 1.75 inches under optimal conditions 

and 3 inches under less favorable conditions such as during periods of high discharge. 

Two nets were deployed in the tailrace of each unit. Each net had a 1 meter by 1 meter square mouth and 

was 18 ft. long with 1 inch square mesh nylon netting. Estimated discharge areal coverage of the partial 

flow nets was 4.5 percent of the two horizontal turbine unit bays and 9.0 percent in the two vertical unit 

bays. 

Entrainment was estimated separately for two horizontal and two vertical turbine units. Units 3 and 4 were 

only sampled in the summer and fall seasonal periods. The Croton impoundment backs up both the 

Muskegon and Little Muskegon rivers. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Hydroacoustic data indicated that 68 percent of entrainment occurred from 

May 20 to August 11. It also indicate little difference in fish densities between the two turbine bays and 

between the upper and lower water column transducers in each bay. Young-of-the-year bluegill recruitment 

was noted in July along with limited yellow perch recruitment. Black crappie peak entrainment was in 

November, mostly young-of-the-year, whereas adults were dominant in the earlier months. 

The relative abundance of fish in Croton Pond (Table 3-23, Binder 6) was as follows: 

Spottail shiner: 71.5 % 

Bluegill: 22.6% 

Yellow perch: 2.8% 

Logperch: 2.6% 

Smallmouth bass: 0.2% 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: Michigan DNR indicated that they have problems with both the 

hydroacoustic and netting sections of this study. Netting probably had significant problems with infiltration, 

net avoidance, and low net efficiency. They believed the netting effort was insufficient to provide reliable 

entrainment estimates. They recommended not using this study in the analysis (letter to D. Hjorth from G. 

Whelan, MDNR, dated April 28, 1993). 

A3.2-7 
Agency/ Applicant Comments: Michigan DNR indicated that they have problems with both the netting 

section of this study. Netting probably had significant problems with infiltration, net avoidance, and low 

net efficiency. They believed the netting effort was insufficient to provide reliable entrainment estimates. 

They believed the netting effort was insufficient to provide reliable entrainment estimates. They 

recommended not using this study in the analysis (letter to D. Hjorth from G. Whelan, MDNR, dated April 

28, 1993). 

A3.2-9 
Project Name: Moores Park FERC #: 10684: Grand River, MI (1.08 MW) 

Explanatozy Comments: Annual hydroacoustic entra.i.n,ment estimates were calculated by Stone & Webster 

and are very conservative. Applicant should confirm the assumptions made in this calculation. 

Hydroacoustic samples were collected bi-weekly, from noon Tuesday until noon Friday. A total of 104 

days were sampled by hydroacoustics. Netting generally encompassed 24 hours. A total of 18 samples 

were collected for a total of 444.1 hours. Monthly entrainment rates were not readily apparent due to 

sampling periods overlapping months; applicant may be able to provide monthly netting and hydroacoustic 

data. Total netting catch was 4731 fish. 

The minimum hydroacoustic target size was estimated to be 2 inches. 

"Controlled fish release studies" were conducted and 68% of the fish released were recovered. This was 

. not indicative of the net efficiency due to retention of fish in the turbine pit. The average recapture rate for 

live fish was 47%. Netting numbers were not adjusted for collection efficiency since the hydroacoustic 

counts were considered most representative of actual entrainment. The nets (one on each tailrace bay) were 

13 ft. deep and 16 ft long with 0.25 inch bar knotless nylon mesh netting. 

Forebay temperature, dissolved oxygen and Secchi disc data are available in Appendix A of the study 

report. 

Principal Study Conclusions: The average hourly entrainment rate based on hydroacoustics was listed as 4.9 

fish/hour (this is different from the total estimated annual entrainment divided by the num~ of hours in the 

year, which is 1.63/hour. S&W). Most (70%) entrainment occurred between noon and midnight. Most 

fish were detected at midwater. When both units were operating simultaneously, the south unit entrained 

twice as many fish as the north unit, due probably to north unit wicket gate problems. Most (91 %) of 

hydroacoustically detected fish were 8 inches or less in length (16% were 4 inches or less in length). In the 

net sampling, 94% of the fish collected were less than 8 inches in length. There was no statistical 

difference between the numbers of fish collected in the tailrace nets and concurrent hydroacoustic estimates. 

Entrainment rates peaked in October/November with lesser peaks in March/ April and late August. The 

lowest rates were in early January and mid-May. Mean daily entrainment rate was 117 fish/day, ranging 

from 17 to 640 fish/day. 

No endangered fish were collected in the net samples. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Michigan DNR had significant problems with the hydroacoustic portion 

of this study (no correlation between netting and hydroacoustics). Net efficiency studies were also consider 

problematical because of fish hanging up in the large forebay and discharge areas. They considered the 

results of this study fair (letter to D. Hjorth from G. Whelan, MDNR, dated April 28, 1993). 

A3.2-11 
Project Name: Kleber FERC #: 10615: Black River, MI (1.2 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Hydroacoustic and tailrace n~tting were only used at one unit. The relative 

abundance was based on a total collection of 5171 fish. Total netting effort was 298.2 hours. The net 

mouth was 16.5 ft by 17ft with a length of 20ft and 0.25 inch bar knotless nylon mesh. The entrainment 

numbers were not adjusted for net efficiency (it was listed as 97%) since the hydroacoustically derived 

entrainment estimates were considered to be the most representative of actual conditions. Net efficiency 

was determined by releasing fish in front of the turbines. 

The minimum estimated hydroacoustic target size was estimated to be 2 inches. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Entrainment peaked in mid-June based on hydroacoustic data, with a lesser 

peak in the fall. Lowest entrainment rates were observed from November to early April. Diel catch was 

variable, with peak rates near midnight. The vertical distribution was uniform. Most (93 %) entrained fish 

were 100 mm or less in length. When hydroacoustics sampled concurrently with nets, hydroacoustics 

predicted the net catch well. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Michigan DNR considered this study to be among the best 

hydroacoustic studies conducted (high correlation between net and hydroacoustic catch). They recommended 

including this study in the database (letter to D. Hjorth from G. Whelan, Michigan DNR, dated April28, 

1993). 

A3.2-13 
Project Name: Constantine FERC #: 10661: St. Joseph River, MI (1.2 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: The entrainment estimate was. based on the collection of 830 fish during 480 hours 

of net sampling. The geometric mean of fish collected during each sampling date was used for 

extrapolation purposes. The consultant justified this methodology because of the non-normal distribution of 

the catch data. The average collection efficiency of mostly small bluegills was 21.7%. The reason for this 

low collection efficiency was believed to be related the fact that the full flow net was only attached at each 

of the four comers. This allowed escapement as the net billowed out. The entrainment catch does reflect 

an adjustment for· collection efficiency. Collection efficiency was determined by through-turbine releases. 

The net mouth was 10ft by 17ft with a 0.25 in mesh inner liner throughout the entire net. (This 

comparatively small mesh would exacerbate the billowing problem previously mentioned. S&W). The 

period from November to March was represented by a collection in mid-December and another in early 

January. 

Plant capacity (1720 cfs) is exceeded 38 % of an average year. The temperature during the entrainment 

study ranged from 0-27.2 C. 

Principal Study Conclusions: In general, more fish were collected at night. The catch was dominated by 

young-of-the-year fish except for mimic shiners. No state or federally listed species of fish occur in the 

project impoundment although river redhorse, which is listed by the State of Michigan as threatened, was 

collected downstream of the project. 

Dominant species in the river near the project were as follows: 

Bluntnose minnow: 21.6% 

Bluegill: 15.5% 

Sand shiner: 14.2% 

Logperch: 10.2% 

Spotfin shiner: 7.4% 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Michigan DNR suggested including this study in the database although 

they had some problems with the amount of sampling effort both temporally and spatially (letter to D. 

Hjorth from G. Whelan, MDNR, dated 4/28/93). 

A3.2-15 
Project Name: Escanaba FERC #: 2506: Escanaba River, :MI (1.95 MW Dam 1 and 

2.5MW Dam 3) 

Explanatory Comments: Fish known to occur only downstream of Dam 1 were assumed to have intruded in 

the net sample and were excluded from the analysis (e.g., splake). The total number of fish collected at 

Dam 1 during 14, forty-eight hour sampling periods was 3445 including all species. However, when 

downstream intruders were eliminated, the total catch of entrained fish was 2312. At Dam 3, a total of 

1615 fish were collected during 14, seventy-two hour sampling periods. No fish were excluded from 

analysis at Dam 3. The entrainment estimates were derived by extrapolating the number of fish per volume 

sampled to the total volume passing through the plant during a given interval. (The annual entrainment was 

adjusted to reflect dates when the plant records showed the plant as not operating, e.g. Table 4. 7, but 

Appendix 1 shows flow through the plant on all dates. If the plant was actually not operating, than the 

annual rate of 5.2 fish /hour should be adjusted to reflect 39 days less of plant operation. This will 

effectively increase the estimated annual entrainment rate to 5.8 fish/hr. S&W). 

Only Unit 2 was sampled by net at Dam 1; only Unit 1 was sampled at Dam 3. The mouth of the Dam 1 

net was 15 ft by 14 ft and 25 ft long with 1.5 inch bar mesh netting. The back half of the net was lined 

with 0.5 inch netting. The Dam 3 net was similar except the mouth of the net was 18 ft by 12 ft. · Net 

efficiency was determined by releasing marked fish directly into the mouth of the net. 

Principal Study Conclusions: At both dams there were no large fluxes of fish passing through the turbines. 

Dam 1: The highest entrainment rate was in June, after the spring runoff (39 % of the total catch and an 

estimated entrainment rate of 1200 fish /day). Most of these fish were sunfish which may have been 

moving towards spawning or summer residence areas. The intake to the project is on the right side of the 

dam, near a shallow portion of the pond. Another peak in October consisted primarily of young-of-the-year 

fish. The smallest fish (e.g., less that 2.5 inches in length) were the most susceptible to entrainment. 

There was no consistent diurnal trend evident for all species except black crappies were more frequently 

entrained at night. Most black crappies were juveniles. 

Dam 3: The highest entrainment rate occurred in April, prior to the spring runoff (38 % of the annual 

catch). Consistently more fish of all size classes and species groupings were entrained at night. Peak 

species entrained at this plant were minnows. A secondary peak in June was primarily attributable to 

sunfish. The powerhouse at Dam 3 is near the center of the dam and away from shallow water. This may 

explain why fewer sunfish were entrained at this site compared to Dam 1. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: According to the Michigan DNR net efficiency tests were not conducted at 

these sites, thus the data should not be used or should be used with great caution (letter to D. Hjorth from 

G. Whelan, MDNR, dated 4/28/93). (Net efficiency was derived in this study by direct releases into the 

net. Refer to page 4-9 of the study report for net efficiency values. S& W) 

A3.2-17 
Project Name: Lock & Dam #2 FERC #: 4306: Mississippi River, :MN (4 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Relative abundance and length frequency distribution were based on the collection 

of 422 fish during 186.4 hours of sampling. The net was suspended 25 feet upstream of the trashracks. 

(The water velocity in the mouth of the net was not provided. If velocity was low, fish may have been able 

to swim out of the net thus biasing the net catch results. S&W> ). A mid-water trawl with a mouth that 

measured 10ft by 9ft and a length of 25 feet was used (one inch stretch mesh). The monthly size range 

by species was presented (Table 8 of the study report) but not readily summarized. 

Hydroacoustics sampled 12825 unit hours from 7 June to 18 April. Net sampling was normally conducted 

4 hours around dusk and 4 hours around dawn every two weeks. Two additional, 24 hour net samples were 

taken with hydroacoustic techniques. An annual entrainment estimate was not presented in the report. This 

is because the plant was not operated during May, usually a relatively high entrainment month. A total 

annual entrainment estimate that did not include May entrainment would not be comparable to entrainment 

·estimates at other sites. 

The minimum hydroacoustic target size was estimated to be 2.5 inches. 

The plant was shut down from June 21, 1990, to July 3, 1990, and November 2-6, 1990, due to high 

tailwater elevations. After April 18, both units were shut down for repairs. Fish passage options at this 

site include spillage, lockage, and through turbines. Daily plant flow data was provided but not readily 

summarized. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Entrainment was highest in June and October, 1990, and lowest in August, 

1990 and December, 1990, to February, 1991. Average entrainment was estimated to be 389 fish/day. 

The highest entrainment was between 0700 and 0900 hours. The least number of fish were entrained 

during the hours represented by 0500 and 1800. There were more fish in the upper portion of the water 

column. Mostly gizzard shad, primarily young-of-the-year, were collected in the fall. Rosyface shiners 

were the most abundant species for the remainder of the year. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: 

A3.2-19 
Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the Michigan Department 

of Natural Resources and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regional office provided numerous comments 

on the entrainment studies conducted at Park Mill. The Agencies provided consolidated comments to the 

applicant. The major points are summarized below: · 

• The netting studies were conducted well and met the study plan objectives. However, the use of 

hydroacoustics to determine net efficiencies was considered inappropriate. 

• The methodology and procedures used in hydroacoustic analysis of entrainment concerned the 

agencies. Specifically, the validity of extrapolating counts to areas not ensonified, the 

appropriateness of the filters used to screen the data (were fish counts omitted?), the questionable 

nature of insect larvae being counted as fish, variability among trained scientists reading the same 

echograms and how these counts related to the computer generated counts and the questionable 

assumption of laminar flow at the intake. 

• There was little correlation between the netting data and the hydroacoustic data. 

· • The actual study deviated from the original approved plan. 

• The agencies mutually decided to recommend use of the hydroacoustic estimates from an earlier 

(1987) study and rely upon 1991 netting data for species and size information. 

Sources: letter toR. Walk from G. Whelan, MDNR, dated 1128/92; memo to J. Dawson and J. 

Meldrim from T. Thuemler, WDNR, dated 1128/92; letter toR. Walk from J. Smith, USFWS, dated 

4/1/92; letter toR. Walk from G. Whelan dated 6/15/92; letter toR. Walk from J. Smith dated 6/17/92; 

letter toR. Walk from N. Kutchery, WDNR, dated 6/17/92; all provided to D. Hjorth from K. 

Scheidegger, WDNR, by letter dated 2/19/93. 

The licensee responded to questions of the methodology and procedures of hydroacoustic technique for 

entrainment estimates. 

The Wisconsin DNR reiterated that problems still remain in resolving discrepancies between the agency and 

licensees entrainment estimate. They pointed out that the net efficiency information included in the database 

were taken from other studies and not applicable to the study conducted at Park Mill. They recommended 

not including this study in the database or only using the netting portion of the data (letter to D. Hjorth 

from T. Thuemler, WDNR, dated 4/9/93). 

A3.2-21 
Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Michigan DNR had numerous concerns with entrainment estimates 

derived from fixed-location, unattended hydroacoustic systems. They were also concerned that Unit 2 was 

down for most of the study and that there was extremely high variability between bays and units. Resource 

agencies originally recommended dual beam transducers at all units, whereas they were actually only used 

at Unit 2. Target strength estimated length from hydroacoustics was very different from fish measured 

from net collections (0.63% of the net catch was over 400 mm in length whereas the hydroacoustic estimate 

indicated that 42.6% of the entrained fish were over 400 mm). (Letter toR. Hayen from W. Houghton, 

MDNR, dated 8/17/92 provided to D. Hjorth from K. Scheidegger, WDNR, by letter dated 2/19/93). 

Wisconsin DNR concurred with Michigan DNR comments. Both believed that entrainment was 

underestimated by the licensee due to inappropriate net efficiency adjustments. WDNR revised the 

entrainment estimates using different (shape and length dependent) adjustment criteria (letter toR. Hayen 

from N. Kutchery, WDNR, dated 8/21192, provided to D. Hjorth by K. Scheidegger, WDNR, by letter 

dated 2/19/93). 

Wisconsin DNR indicated that the entrainment data presented in the draft database was not from the final 

report (letter to D. Hjorth from T. Tbuemler, WDNR, dated 4/9/93). A review of the data indicated that 

the entrainment data included in the draft database was extracted form the final report. 

A3.2-23 
Project Name: Thornapple FERC #: 2475: Flambeau River, WI (1.4 MW) 

Explanatorv Comments: Net efficiency was determined by releasing fish directly into the net- 80% were 

recaptured. Those fish not recaptured were assumed to be fish left in the pit or net. Fish released ahead of 

the turbines resulted iD a capture rate of 68.2%. This number was adjusted upward to reflect the proportion 

"left in the pit or net" to arrive at an overall efficiency of 85.3%. 

Net sampling for 864 hours resulted in the collection of 3378 fish. Monthly and annual entrainment was 

estimated by extrapolating the collection rate to the time that the units were operating and also by flow 

volume sampled relative to the flow volume that passed through the plant. The latter was viewed as the 

most appropriate estimate (64,000 vs. 61,000 fish annually, respectively) because it was based on smaller 

and more precise units of measurement (cfs). Collected fish with body widths greater than the trash rack 

bar spacing were subtracted from their database (67 fish). The average entrainment rate of November and 

"March was used to account for those months not sampled (December, Januazy and February). 

The net mouth was 14ft by 13ft. It was 50ft long with 0.75 inch mesh (0.25 inch for the last 15ft.). 

Principal Study Conclusions: Approximately 80% of the fish collected were less than 6.0 inches in length59% were between 2.0 and 3.9 inches long. Of this 59%,28% were panfish, 24% minnows, and 15% 

bass. Entrainment numbers were positively correlated with the abundance of young-of-the-year fish. 

Weather, including wind, seemed to have no effect on entrainment numbers. There was no .positive 

correlation observed between total river flow or total flow through the plant and the number of fish 

entrained. Time specific entrainment patterns were generally not observed. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Wisconsin DNR indicated that the results of this study should be 

included in the database (letter to D. Hjorth from T. Thuemler, WDNR, dated 4/9/93). 

The applicant indicated that the entrainment results are considered preliminary. Resource agencies have 

asked the applicant to recompute the entrainment numbers based on size and species-specific categories of 

fish used for net efficiency estimates (letter to F. Winchell from L. Everhart, Northern States Power Co., 

dated 6/2/93). 

A3.2-25 
Project Name: Upper FERC #: 2640: North Fork Flambeau River, WI (0.9 MW) 

Ex:elanato!Y Comments: This site was sampled by hydroacoustics only. An indication of the species 

composition can be obtained from the Crowley net data and the Upper Flowage fish sampling program 

conducted by the Wisconsin DNR in 1990. The hydroacoustic entrainment estimate is for fish greater than 

1. 75-2.0 inches in length. 

Hourly turbine flow data is presented for the entire year but not readily summarized for inclusion in the 

database. 

Principal Study Conclusions: The highest estimated daily entrainment rate was on April 8, 1992 ( 1874 

fish). There was no defined diel trend in entrainment. 

The Upper impoundment is very similar to Crowley. It has an average depth of 9.1 ft. The population of 

walleye was larger in the Crowley Flowage (19/acre) than in the Upper flowage (6/acre). Other gamefish 

were more abundant in the Upper Flowage compared to Crowley. The estimated populations of gamefish 

were as follows: walleye- 2681; northern pike- 1613; lake sturgeon- 879; and muskellunge- 346. These 

gamefish comprised 27.9% of all fish collected in the impoundment. Panfish comprised 24.1% of all 

collected in the impoundment (49. 7% of those were pumpkinseeds) and rough fish comprised 72.8% of the 

fish collected (72.8% of these were silver redhorse, which comprised 35% of all fish collected in the 

impoundment). Fishing pressure was highest (28 hrs/acre during the summer) in the Upper Flowage 

compared to Crowley, Lower, and Pixley. The state listed (threatened) greater redhorse is confirmed to be 

present in the Upper Flowage. This species is not federally listed. 

Agency/ A:eplicant Comments: 

A3.2-27 
Project Name: Pixley FERC #: 2395: North Fork Flambeau River, WI (0.96 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: This site was sampled by hy4roacoustics only. An indication of the species 

composition can be obtained from the Crowley net data and the Pixley Flowage fish sampling program 

conducted by the Wisconsin DNR in 1990. The hydroacoustic entrainment estimate is for fish greater than 

2.5 inches in length. 

Hourly turbine flow data for the entire year is presented in the study report but not readily summarized for 

this database. 

Principal Study Conclusions: The highest estimated daily entrainment occurred on October 9, 1991 (4230 

fish). 

·The impoundment is best characterized as having a cool to moderately warmwater fishery. Aquatic 

vegetation is abundant throughout the reservoir. WDNR fishery investigations show that the Pixley and 

Crowley impoundments have similar fishery resources. They found similar population estimates for top 

predators in both impoundments: walleye- 19/acre in Crowley impoundment and 16/acre in Pixley. 

impoundment; northern pike- 0.36/acre in Crowley impoundment and 1.55/acre in Pixley impoundment; 

and muskellunge- 0.03/acre in Crowley impoundment and 0.09/acre in Pixley impoundment. Catch per unit 

effort of white suckers was also similar in both impoundments (23.3/hour of electrofishing at Pixley and 

22.9/hour at Crowley). 

Agency/ A:~mlicant Comments: 

A3.2-29 
Project Name: Wisconsin River Division FERC #: 2590: Wisconsin River, WI (1.8 

MW) 

Explanatozy Comments: Net sampling was conducted in the tailrace of Unit 1, a mid-channel unit. Net 

efficiency was determined by releasing dyed fish into the mouth of the net during June, August and 

November. Test fish ranged in length from 29 to 179 mm. The mouth of the net was 18 ft by 17 ft. It 

was 40 ft long with 0. 75 inch bar mesh and the rear half lined with 0.25 inch bar mesh netting. 

Entrainment was estimated by expanding the number of fish collected in the volume of water that passed 

through the net tO the total volume passing through the plant. Fish that were obviously dead prior to 

passage were not included in the entrainment estimate. A total of 1200 fish were collected. The only 

option to turbine passage is spillage over the dam. Hydroacoustic sampling was conducted but the results 

were rejected because of excessive noise and the prevalence of small fish. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Significant regional sportfish present in this flowage include walleye, 

-smallmouth bass, bluegill, and white and black crappie. No state or federally listed species were collected. 

Population estimates based on electrofishing data obtained in September, 1991, (generally Age I fish and 

older) were as follows: 

Bluegills ( > 2 ")- 10,571 (44.0/acre) 

Smallmouth bass ( > 4 ")- 13,553 (56.5/acre) 

Black crappie ( > 2 ")- 12,701 (~2.9/acre) 

Walleye (>8 in.)- 3,685 (15.3/acre) 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Wisconsin DNR indicated that the results of this study should be 

included in the database (letter to D. Hjorth from T. Thuemler, WDNR, dated 4/9/93). 

A3.2-31 
Project Name: Shawano (Balsam Row) FERC #: 710: Wolf River, WI (0.7 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Two nets were used to sample the two discharge bays of this single unit plant. 

The full flow tailrace nets had 0. 75 inch bar knotted nylon netting with a full 0.25 inch bar knotless nylon 

liner. A total of 3650 fish were collected during approximately 840 hours of net sampling. Net efficiency 

was determined by releasing fish into the net during each 24 hour sampling period. Through turbine 

releases were made to assess turbine mortality and to serve as a check of net efficiency. 

Hydroacoustic data was supplemented with netting data for June and 15 days of July to derive the estimated 

total entrainment for this technique. Netting data was supplemented by hydroacoustic data during February 

to derive the total annual entrainment estimate by netting. 

Hourly turbine flow data is presented in the study report but not readily summarized to fit this database. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Hydroacoustic sampling indicated that the riverside intake had 12% of the 

detected targets, the center opening had 33 % of the detected targets and the shoreside intake had 55% of the 

detected targets. Hydroacoustics were considered to be the primary method of entrainment estimation. 

Hydroacoustic and netting results during coincident sampling days showed that similar entrainment estimates 

could be made by using either technique. Fish 6 inches in length or shorter predominated the total 

entrainment numbers. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: The Wisconsin DNR, in a letter to Dennis Geary from Thomas Tbuemler 

dated August 28, 1992, (provided to D. Hjorth by K. Scheidegger, WDNR, by letter dated 2/19/93) 

expressed concern that rips in the netting may have biased the data that was collected prior to June 28, 

1991. They did not agree that similar entrainment estimates could be derived from netting and 

hydroacoustic data. WDNR provided additional comments in a letter dated January 15, 1993. They 

indicated that the net efficiency determinations should have been derived by through turbine releases rather 

than releases directly into the net. They also did not agree with the use of a single net efficiency value. 

They prefer developing separate size and shape dependent net efficiencies. They did not accept the net 

efficiency studies and recommended conducting new efficiency studies using guidelines developed by the 

WDNR and the regional office of the USFWS. 

A3.2-33 
Project Name: 99 Islands FERC #: 2331: Broad River, SC (18 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Entrainment estimates were derived from net data based on 68 hours of daytime 

netting (0800 hrs - 1700 hrs). Two recovery nets attached to one frame sampled the entire Unit 4 

discharge. Each net was 4.1 m by 3.2 m by 10.1 m. Netting was 0. 75 inch bar mesh knotted nylon. The 

first two hour sample of the four samples collected during each month sampled represented unit start-up 

conditions. The three remaining two hour samples represented steady state operating conditions. There 

were no trends evident between these two types of samples and they were combined for analytical purposes. 

Total plant entrainment was estimated by expanding the hourly rate derived from sampling to allow for all 

unit operation time during each month. Entrainment at all units was assumed to be similar to the unit 

sampled. Net efficiency was determined by through-turbine releases of fish. 

Hydroacoustics sampled 2042 hours of plant operation from February to November, 1990 (except October). 

Data was collected for 50% of each month sampled. Target strengths greater than 100 mm (4 inches) were 

·counted. Because the entrainment estimates derived by netting and hydroacoustics were statistically similar, 

the hydroacoustic numbers were "calibrated" based on netting catch adjusted for netting efficiency. This 

process also included adjusting the hydroacoustic counts to account for the proportion of fish collected in 

~-~~~than~mm~ · 

Length data for individual specimens provided but not summarized. Hourly rates for Unit 4 by species and 

month are provided in the report. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Based on netting data, 43% of the entrained fish were non-game species. 

Tailrace intrusion was believed to occur, resulting in high net-estimated entrainment rates. No adjustments 

were made for intrusion even though size and habitat preference indicated that some fish were not reservoir 

dwelling. Adjustments were made to account for netting efficiency. 

Hydroacoustic data showed that entrainment rates were higher at night during February, March and 

November but higher in daylight for the other months sampled. Most fish were near the top of the intake 

and 69% were less than 150 mm in length based on target strength. Only 3% of the fish were detected 

within the 5 meter depth interval where the water velocity (0.55 m/sec) was considerably lower than the 

1.03-1.78 m/sec water velocity measured at the 1-4 meter depth intervals. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: 

A3.2-35 
Project Name: Saluda FERC #: 2406: Saluda River, SC (2.4 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Entrainment estimates were qerived from net data based on 48 hours of daytime 

netting (0800 hrs- 1700 hrs). One recovery net attached to a frame sampled the entire Unit 1 discharge, 

although isolating the entire Unit 1 discharge from the other three units was virtually impossible and some 

sampled flow may have been from adjacent units. The net was 2.6 m by 2.6 m by 6.1 m. Netting was 

0. 75 inch bar mesh knotted nylon. The first two hour sample of the four samples collected during each 

month sampled represented unit start-up conditions and the remaining three two hour samples represented 

steady state operating conditions. There were no trends evident between these two types of samples and 

they were combined for analytical purposes. Total plant entrainment was estimated by expanding the hourly 

rate derived from sampling to allow for all unit operation time during each month. Entrainment at all units 

was assumed to be similar to the unit sampled. Six months of the year were actually sampled and rates for 

three months were extrapolated. March, April and May were not evaluated. The projected entrainment 

based on netting of 8727 4 fish is only for a nine month period. 

Hydroacoustics sampled 1587 hours of plant operation from January 1990 to January, 1991. Unit 1 

operated very little in May, September and November and not at all in July due to mechanical problems. 

Hydroacoustics sampled Unit 2 in December 1990 and January 1991. Data was collected for 50% ·of each 

month sampled. Target strengths greater than 100 mm (4 inches) were counted. Because the entrainment 

estimates derived by netting and hydroacoustics were statistically similar, the hydroacoustic numbers were 

"calibrated" based on netting catch adjusted for netting efficiency. This process also included adjusting the 

hydroacoustic counts by the proportion of fish collected by netting that were less than 100 mm long. Net 

efficiency was determined by through-turbine releases of fish. 

Length data for individual specimens was provided but not summarized. Hourly rates for Unit 4 by species 

and month are provided in the report. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Net estimated entrainment was highest in October and lowest in September. 

Of those fish collected, 48% were non-game species. Tailrace intrusion into the collection net was believed 

to occur. Hydroacoustic data showed higher catches at night in March, April, May and October, but 

entrainment during daylight in January (both 1990 and 1991), June, November and December. Depth 

distribution was skewed toward the top of the intake from November to January (1991), but no vertical 

trend was evident for the _rest of the year. Target strength analysis indicated that 56% of the entrained fish 

were less than 150 mm in length and that the length frequency distribution changed little over the course of 

the year. Although the net and hydroacoustically derived entrainment rates were statistically similar, the net 

derived rates were often higher than the acoustically derived rates. The spring hydroacoustic rates were 

accepted by the agencies even though there was no netting during the comparable period. They agreed to 

assume that length distribution and species composition for this period was the same as for the pooled nine 

months of netting data. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: 

A3.2-37 
Project Name: Buzzards Roost FERC #: 1267: Saluda River, SC (15 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Tailrace netting was conducted for a total of 128 hours. High initial threadfin shad 

catches in December caused net failure, which reduced the sampling effort until the nets could be repaired. 

Two identical nets were used to sample the flow from the two Unit 2 draft tubes. The nets had a mouth 

that measured 3.05 m by 3.05 meters. They were 10.67 meters long with 0.75 inch bar nylon netting. 

Longnose gar, American eel and blackbanded darters in the net collections were believed to be tailwater 

intruders and not included in the entrainment estimate. Entrainment was estimated by expanding the 

empirically derived hourly rate by the number of hours each unit operates in a typical year. Entrainment at 

unsampled units 1 and 3 was assumed to be similar to that at Unit 2. (There were apparently no net 

efficiency studies conducted. Net data was only intended to provide species composition and length 

frequency data. S & W.) 

· Hydroacoustics sampled all 3964 hours of plant operation during the one year study. From November to 

February and June to October, the detectable target strength was set at 100 mm (4 inches) or greater. From 

February to mid June, the target strength minimum detection limit was set at 150 mm (6 inches) or greater. 

The percentage of fish in the net collections below the hydroacoustic detection limit was used to adjust the 

hydroacoustic estimates. 

Individual specimen length was provided but not summarized. A conceptual cost estimate for one inch trash 

racks is also provided. 

Principal Study Conclusions: The daytime entrainment rate (6.88 fish/ hour) was significantly lower than 

the nighttime rate (11.41 fish/ hour). Daytime abundance of threadfin shad was nearly four times higher 

than at night. Highest threadfin shad entrainment (January and February) may have been due to low water 

temperature (7-10 C). This is the critical temperature range at which winter kills may occur. Simultaneous 

net and hydroacoustic estimates had high statistical correlation. 

Hydroacoustics estimated that the population of forage fish (less than 15 mm in length) in Lake Greenwood 

was comprised of approximately 153.6 million individuals. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: 

A3.2-39 
Project Name: Dam #4 FERC #: 2516: Potomac River, WV (1.1MW,1986; 

2.1, 1992) 

Explanatory Comments: The entrainment rates were not provided in the summary report; only the number 

collected by species and sampling effort. Sampling for 1870.2 hours in 1986 resulted in the collection of 

1065 fish. The species specific monthly and total entrainment rates for 1986 were calculated by S&W 

assuming an average collection efficiency of 74% as presented by the licensee. The licensee provided 1992 

with the monthly and total entrainment rates calculated by the same method used by Stone & Webster. The 

mouth of the collection net was 22 ft by 14 ft and 52ft long with a mesh of 0.5 inches. Net efficiency was 

established by through-turbine releases of dead channel catfish, bluegill, and largemouth bass at half and 

full power settings. 

Principal Study Conclusions: 

Agency/ APPlicant Comments: The State of West Virginia Department of Natural Resources was satisfied 

with the entrainment study performed at Dam #4 (letter to F. Winchell from J. Rawson, WVDNR, dated 

2/19/93). 

A3.2-41 
Project Name: Hawks Nest FERC #: 2512: New River, WV (102 MW) 

Explanatory Comments: Net samples were collected qn 32 days and hydroacoustics sampled on 332 days 

(each sample lasted at least 24 hours). Entrainment was extrapolated by taking fish/volume sampled and 

applying to the estimated volume passing through the project. Species composition information derived 

from netting data was applied to hydroacoustically derived counts. The minimum hydroacoustic target was 

3 inch fish. The partial flow nets were frame mounted fyke nets with 0.75 inch mesh nets. The operating 

discharge port to be sampled was chosen at random. 

Conceptual screen costs are provided. 

Principal Study Conclusions:The hydroacoustic estimates of entrainment were considered the most accurate. 

Hydroacoustics may have overestimated entrainment during October and November due to leaf litter and 

debris. An estimated 21119 sportfish were entrained. Most (52%) were juvenile catfish 4 inches or less in 

length. Bluegills 8 inches or smaller comprised 23.6% of the sportfish catch and hybrid striped bass 8-12 

inches long comprised 14.6% of the sportfish catch. During every month but December, 70-95% of all 

entrained fish were in the upper third of the water column. 

Agency/ A~mlicant Comments: The West Virginia DNR was troubled with the difficulty in distinguishing 

between trash, debris and fish in the hydroacoustically derived entrainment estimates (letter to F. Winchell 

from J. Rawson, WVDNR, dated 2/19/93). 

The U.S. FWS, West Virginia Field Office, indicated that data provided and methods used appeared to be 

satisfactory. U.S. FWS believed intake screening may not be a cost-effective mitigative measure (letter to 

A. Sims from C. Kulp, U.S. FWS, dated 11/29/90). 

A3.2-43 
Project Name: Greenup L&D (Vanceburg) 

(69MW) 

FERC #: 2614: Ohio River, OH/KT 

Explanatory Comments: The Unit 1 turbine gallery net mouth was 9 ft by 6. 7 ft and 13 ft long with 5/8 

inch square mesh. There were 20.5 hours sampled by net during the spring, 26.25 during the summer and 

14.17 hours during the fall. Spring forebay hydroacoustic hours sampled were 73; summer- 70.5; and fall53. Day/night data is available. Bypass options for fish are spillage and lockage. The distribution of fish 

in the impoundment was investigated with hydroacoustics and several other fish sampling methods. No 

population estimates are provided. (Annual entrainment rates were not calculated due to large portion of 

the year not sampled. S&W). 

The minimum detectable hydroacoustic target strength was -61 dB. The estimated length of this decibel 

value was not provided. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Fish abundance in the impoundment as measured by hydroacoustics doubled 

from spring to summer and again from summer to fall. This reflects recruitment of gizzard shad. For all 

three seasons, more fish were entrained at Unit 1 than units 2 and 3, probably because fish were following 

the Ohio shoreline. Gamefish that were entrained include channel catfish, sauger, white bass and sunfish. 

These accounted for only 0.3 % of the net catch. Most of these were small channel catfish. "Entrainment" 

was also measured at Gate 9 to indicate fish passage by spillage. The autumn rates were higher than that at 

the plant. The species composition of entrained fish was quite different than that in the study area. The 

relative abundance of fish in the impoundment as determined by electroshocking (N=2117 fish) was as 

follows: 

Gizzard shad: 58% 

Bluegill: 10% 

Emerald shiner: 6% 

Freshwater drum: 3% 

Largemouth bass: 3% 

Common carp: 3% 

Sauger: 3% 

River carpsucker: 3% 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: 

A3.2-44 
Project Name: Beaver Falls (Townsend Dam) 

PA (SMW) 

FERC #: 3451: Beaver River, 

Explanatory Comments: Nets were sampled for nineteen, 24-hour samples, resulting in the collection of 853 

fish. Unit 2 was sampled with a net that was 18ft by 18ft at the mouth and 55ft long with one inch 

stretch mesh in the first 10 ft of the net and 0. 75 inch stretch mesh netting in the remainder of the net. 

Unit 1 was inoperative during much of the study period, which extended from January 1992 to August 

1992. The entire station did not operate from October to December, 1991, due to low river flows. 

Extrapolation to unsam.pled time periods was as follows; April was assumed to the mean percent 

composition and entrainment rate of March and May. July data was bolstered by including August 3 data 

with the limited data collected during July. September to December entrainment used the pooled data 

collected during the 19 sampling efforts. (Hourly rates presented in fields H14 to H17 reflect this 

assumption and were calculated by S & W). Entrainment was projected by using the fish/volume of water 

sampled vs the total flow through the project. Netting efficiency was evaluated by releasing 551 4-6 inch 

·dead bluegills and green sunfish through the turbines. 

Principal Study Conclusions: The entrainment estimates presented are for Unit 2 only. Applicant indicates 

that it is not valid to assume the same density at Unit 1 because the entrainment rate significantly decreased 

when both units were operated, compared to when only one unit was operated. The density of fish 

entrained during two unit operation was approximately 88% less than one unit operation based on a limited 

study to address this issue. Entrainment was episodic and not uniformly density dependent. There was no 

significant relationship observed between entrainment rate and river discharge, plant discharge, temperature 

or day vs night. 

The tailrace fishery was considered to be the most significant fishery on the Beaver River. Above the 

hydroelectric plant, there is little fishing pressure. Sport fish sought include sauger, "saugeye", channel 

catfish and tiger muskies. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: 

A3.2-45 
Project Name: Youghiogheny 

MW) 

FERC #: 3623: Youghiogheny River, PA (U.2 

Explanatory Comments: Raw catch/hour data was presented; monthly data with net efficiency adjustment 

were not presented; applicant may be able to provide summarized data. There was no flow through the 

turbines from November 11 to December 18, 1991. When no flow is passing through the hydroelectric 

plant, fish are still entrained through the discharge tunnel because the turbine penstocks tap into discharge 

tunnel. The discharge tunnel flow is under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 

The net mouth was 7ft by 19.75 ft, and 70ft long with 0.75 inch square mesh netting. The last 25ft was 

lined with 0.25 inch mesh. Net efficiency was determined by releasing rainbow trout and golden shiners 

into the mouth of the net. 

Principal Study Conclusions: Most (73.3%) of the fish were collected at Unit 1. This unit operated during 

a one week period (January 5-12, 1992) when an estimated 45.3 % of the total alewife entrainment 

occurred. Other differences between units were considered to be random. Most fish (six times more) were 

collected at night. Most fish were entrained from October to March. Few specimens, except yellow perch 

were collected from April to July. 

Most alewife were 41-61 mm TL (young-of-year). The highest catch corresponds to the lowest temperature 

and the highest discharge. The intake is a deepwater intake. It is believed that approach velocities 

exceeded the maximum swimming speed of alewife (which is reduced during cold whether) to account for 

episodic high entrainment rates. Entrained walleye ranged from 221-531 mm TL (age 3 dominated). Most 

(60 %) were entrained between December and March. The catch of walleye per hour never exceeded 0.6/ 

hour and was usually less than 0.1/hour. Higher walleye entrainment occurred when there was high alewife 

entrainment and when there were low temperatures, high discharge and night conditions. Most crappies 

were entrained from late October to early March. Entrainment was limited to periods of low water 

temperature and perhaps related to general downstream movement by this species. Yellow perch 

entrainment was variable throughout the year. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: 

A3.2-46 
Project Name: Station 26 FERC #: 2584: Genesee River, NY (3 MW) 

Explanatoty Comments: Relative abundance of entraiJ;ted fish was based on the collection of 341 fish. 

Partial flow turbine gallery nets sampled intake bays 2 and 8 in front of the trash racks (no approach 

velocity information was included in the report. S & W). The netting consisted of trammel nets with a 

mouth that was 18.7 ft by 12.5 ft and 4ft deep. The outer walls were 14 inches and the inner wall 1 inch 

stretch monofilament. The trammel nets were sampled on 25 days from November 1989 to October 1990. 

The minimum detectable hydroacoustic target strength was estimated to be -53 dB. An estimate of the size 

that this decibel value equates to was not provided. 

Over the course of the study, flow averaged 1055 cfs at the turbine intake, 1594 at the spillway and 53 cfs 

at the "race" (see below). 

Principal Study Conclusions: Daily entrainment rates ranged from 0 to 1014 fish/hr. Generally, 1-30 fish 

per hour were entrained, with peaks occurring in August, September and October. There was a shift in 

passage from the upstream end of the intake structure (which is oriented parallel to the flow of the.water) in 

June to the downstream in September. Overall, the lowest entrainment rates occurred in the middle intakes. 

Diel passage trends were variable, possibly due to variations in river flow and plant operations. There was 

no vertical stratification of entrained fish indicated by the hydroacoustic data. The highest mean fish 

passage over the entire sampling period was at the spillway, followed by the Johnson-Seymour Race and the 

turbine intake which each had comparable mean rates. Passage rates were dependent on which conduits 

were open and when they were open. The "race" is a canal on the opposite side of the river from the 

power plant, which provides flow for a waterfall and air conditioning for the City library. From May to 

November, there is approximately 75 cfs flowing in the race. During the rest of the year it is closed. 

(Contrast this to the 1594 cfs that passed through the turbine during the study period.). The higher 

downstream passage rates in the fall were attributed to young-of-the-year gizzard shad. Smaller fish, such 

as shiners, dominated the collections in May. 

Agency/ Applicant Comments: The USFWS commented that although the amount of netting conducted was 

not rigorous, the species composition and abundance as sampled probably represented a cross-section of the 

river's fishery in proportion with their relative abundances (letter to F. Winchell from D. Bryson, USFWS 

Cortland NY office, dated 517 /93). 

A3.2-47 

APPENDIX4 

DETAILED STATISTICAL RESULTS AND PLOTS OF 

EXPLORATORY REGRESSION ANALYSES 

APPENDIX 4 

ORDER OF CONTENTS 

Reservoir Size 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size - All Data 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size- w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size - w /o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size- Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size- Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size - All Data 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size- w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size- Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size- Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

Reservoir Length 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Length - All Data 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Length- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Length- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Length - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Length - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Length - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Length - All Data 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Length- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Length- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Length - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Length - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Length - Broad River Sites 

A4-i 
Total Reservoir Storage 

Fish/hr by Total Storage - All Data 

Fish/hr by Total Storage- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr by Total Storage- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

Fish/hr by Total Storage- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Total Storage- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Total Storage - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Total Storage - Au Sable River Sites w I o Five Channels 

Fish/hr by Total Storage - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Total Storage - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr by Total Storage- Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage - All Data 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage- All Data w/o Buzzards· Roost and Youghiogheny 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage- Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage- Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

Hydraulic Capacity 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity - All Data 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Hawks Nest 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity - w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only w/o Wisconsin River 

Division 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity- Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity- Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr by Hydraulic Capacity- Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity - All Data 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Hawks Nest 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity- w/o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity - w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only w/o Prickett 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity- Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity- Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-ii 
Reservoir Throu~h-Plant Flush Rate 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate - All Data 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate- All Data wlo Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate- All Data wlo Buzzards Roost, Abbeville and Youghiogheny 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate - w I o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate- wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate - Au Sable River Sites w lo Five Channels 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate - Broad River Sites w lo Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate - All Data 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate - All Data w /o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Flush Rate - w I o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate- w/o Clupeid Sites wlo Abbeville 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Flush Rate- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate- wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only w/o Prickett 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Flush Rate - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate- Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Flush Rate - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Flush Rate - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate- Broad River Sites wlo Buzzards Roost 

Dta>th to Top of Intake 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth - All Data 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth - All Data wlo Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth- All Data wlo Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth - w I o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth - Broad River Sites wlo Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Intake Depth - All Data 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Depth- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Intake Depth- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Depth- wlo Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Depth- wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Depth - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Depth - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Depth - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Intake Depth- Broad River Sites wlo Buzzards Roost 

A4-iii 
Trash Rack Spacing 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing - All Data 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing- All Data wlo Youghiogheny 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing- wlo Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing- wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing- wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only wlo Centralia 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing- Flambeau River Sites wlo Lower 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Trash Rack Spacing - All Data 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Trash Rack Spacing- All Data wlo Youghiogheny 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Trash Rack Spacing - w lo Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Trash Rack Spacing- wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Trash Rack Spacing - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Trash Rack Spacing - Flambeau River Sites 

Average Velocity at Trash Racks 

Fish/hr by Intake Velocity - All Data 

Fish/hr by Intake Velocity - w I o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by Intake Velocity - wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hr by Intake Velocity - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hr by Intake Velocity - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hr by Intake Velocity - Broad River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Velocity - All Data 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Velocity - w I o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Velocity- wlo Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Velocity - Au Sable River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Velocity - Flambeau River Sites 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Velocity - Broad River Sites 

A4-iv 
Usable Storage 

Fish/hr by Usable Storage- All Data 

Fish/hr by Usable Storage - All Data w /o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr by Usable Storage - w I o Clupeid Sites. 

Fish/hr by Usable Storage- w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

Average River Flow 

Fish/hr by River Flow - All Data 

Fish/hr by River Flow- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

Fish/hr by River Flow - All Data w /o Buzzards Roost and Dam #4 

Fish/hr by River Flow - All Data w /o Clupeid Sites 

Fish/hr by River Flow- All Data w/o Buzzards Roost, Dam #4, Wisconsin River Division and 

Centralia 

Fish/hr by River Flow - All Data w/o Buzzards Roost, Dam #4, Wisconsin River Division, 

Centralia, and Five Channels 

A4-v 

2000 

"C" 1500 

:::J 

0 

.s:::. 

-.s:::. 

UJ 

s 

E 

~ 1000 

c 

]! 

c: 

w 

.! 

0 500 I-

.Hardy 

-5004-------~------~------~--------~------~------~ 

05749A.B02 

0 2000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

4000 6000 8000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

- Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size - All Data 

A4-1 

10000 1200 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.841343 

Root Mean Square Error 156.446 

Mean of Response 85.07098 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 5061831.2 5061831 206.8133 

Error 39 954539.2 24475 Prob>F 

C Total 40 6016370.3 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -100.5707 27.6333 -3.64 0.0008 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.192872 0.01341 14.38 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree::2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.983476 

Root Mean Square Error 51.14814 

Mean of Response 85.07098 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 5916957.3 2958479 1130.86 

Error 38 99413.0 2616 Prob>F 

C Total 40 6016370.3 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 34.578112 11.726 2.95 0.0054 

Reservoir Size On acres) -0.049735 0.01412 -3.52 0.0011 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 0.0000232 0 18.08 0.0000 

05749A.B02 A4-2 
Total Entrainment fish/hour B Reservoir Size in acres 

200 

..:::- 150 :::J 

0 

.t: 

._ 

.s::; 

en 

:s. 

-

c:: 

11) 

E 

c:: 1 00 e 

c: 

w 

'ii 

0 

1-

50 

• Youghiogheny 

• French Landing 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Five Channels 

.cooke 

0~~--~----~------~----~----~-----r----~----~ 

0 500 1 000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Size- w/o Buzzards Roost 

05749A.B02 A4-3 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.123738 

Root Mean Square Error 42.20424 

Mean of Response 24.89275 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 9557.926 9557.93 5.3660 

Error 38 67685.526 1781.20 Prob>F 

C Total 39 77243.452 0.0260 

· (Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 10.986954 8.97587 1.22 0.2285. 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0198237 0.00856 2.32 0.0260 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.146241 

Root Mean Square Error 42.218 

Mean of Response 24.89275 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF. Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 11296.154 5648.08 3.1689 

Error 37 65947.298 1782.36 Prob>F 

C Total 39 77243.452 0.0537 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 2.9421 12.1236 0.24 0.8096 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0421787 0.0242 1.74 0.0897 

Reservoir Size (in acres)-"2 -0.000007 0 -0.99 0.3298 

05749A.B02 A4-4 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour]_ B_y Reservoir Size (in acres) 

~ 

:::l 

0 

.c 

....... 

.c 

UJ 

;;::: 

--

c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

~ 

-c: 

w 

Cii 

{!. -

200~--------------------------------------------------~ 

• French Landing 

150-

100- .centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

so- • Five Channels 

. ~=----=:::=::..---:=:::::::::-~::.:::::::::::--­ ?·. :. . .. ·:=- ' ~. . '1- o~~---r-,----~.------r-,----~.------~,----,,------~.----~ 

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 

Fitting 

--Linear Fit 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size 

w/o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

4000 

05749A.B02 A4-5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00622 

Root Mean Square Error 33.26164 

Mean of Response 20.08538 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 39 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 256.211 256.21 0.2316 

Error 37 40934.452 1106.34 Prob>F 

C Total 38 41190.663 0.6332 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.749304 7.20642 2.46 0.0186 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0036126 0.00751 0.48 0.6332 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.053453 

Root Mean Square Error 32.90934 

Mean of Response 20.08538 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 39 

(Analysis of Variance J 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2. 2201.785 1100.89 1.0165 

Error 36 38988.879 1083.02 Prob>F 

C Total 38 41190.663 0.3720 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.2641162 9.53503 0.97 0.3377 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0272015 0.0191 1.42 0.1631 

Reservoir Size (in acres)l\2 -0.000007 0 -1.34 0.1885 

05749A.B02 A4-6 
;:::-

:::1 

0 

.r: 

....... 

.r: 

rn 

;;:: 

--c:: 

CD 

E 

c:: ·m 

.... 

-

c:: 

w 

'iii -0 

1-

• French landing 

150 

100 .Centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

50 • Five Channels 

.Foote 

·.·: o~~---T------~----~----~------~----~----~------4 

0 500 

Fitting 

-linear Fit 

1000 1500 2000 2500 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

3000 3500 4000 

05749A.B02 A4-7 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.006192 

Root Mean Square Error 34.08022 

Mean of Response 20.24946 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 253.289 253.29 0.2181 

Error 35 40651.147 1161.46 Prob>F 

C Total 36. 40904.435 0.6434 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.802296 7.67149 2.32 0.0263 

Reservoir Size (in acres} 0.0036384 0.00779 0.47 0.6434 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.056423 

Root Mean Square Error 33.69258 I Mean of Response 20.24946 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 2307.970 1153.98 1.0166 

Error 34 38596.465 1135.19 Prob>F 

C Total 36 40904.435 0.3726 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.4978778 10.2641 0.83 0.4135 

Reservoir Size (in acres} 0.0285099 0.02003 1.42 0.1637 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 -0.000008 0 -1.35 0.1874 

05749A.B02 A4-8 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Reservoir Size (in acres) 

'C' 

::::J 

0 

~ Cl) 

:;:: 

-

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

1~ 

E 

w 

a:s 

~ 

100.-----------------------------------------------------~ 

.centralia 

90-

ao- ·Wisconsin River Division 

70-

60-

so40-

30-

20-

~ .Roths 

·~. hite Rap• s--:~~--~----:::::::::--~::::::::::_ __ _------.:_____ • ..;.P~ri;.,;.ck;.;.;e:..:.;tt=---~ 

10-

.. 0~------~------~~------~------~~------~------~~------~ 

0 500 1000 1500 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

05749A.B02 A4-9 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.002599 

Root Mean Square Error 28.70989 

Mean of Response 18.96937 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

Analysis of Variance J 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 30.064 30.064 0.0365 

Error 14 11539.610 824.258 Prob>F 

C Total 15 11569.674 0.8513 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 20.698075 11.552 1.79 0.0948. 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.0039 0.02042 -0.19 0.8513 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of_ Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.023683 

Root Mean Square Error 29.47706 

Mean of Response 18.96937 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 274.009 137.005 0.1577 

Error 13 11295.665 868.897 Prob>F 

C Total 15 11569.674 0.8557 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 29.299882 20.1052 1.46 0.1688 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.038736 0.06901 -0.56 0.5841 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 0.0000214 0.00004 0.53 0.6051 

05749A.B02 A4-10 
Total Entrainment fish/hour Reservoir Size in acres 

45 

40 

-;::::-

:::::J 

0 

.c 35 ....... 

.c 

(I) 

e 

-c 

CD 30 E 

c: ·e 

-

c: 

w .cooke 25 

n; 

-0 

1-

20 

.Foote 

15 

10~----~-----r----~----~~~~~~~----~----~ 

05749A.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

500 1000 

Reservoir Size (in acres} 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-ll 

1500 2000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.22458 

Root Mean Square Error 13.65279 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 215.94140 215.941 1.1585 

Error 4 745.59509 186.399 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.3424 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 34.209535 12.3135 2.78 0.0499· 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.010784 0.01002 -1.08 0.3424 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of. Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.965875 

Root Mean Square Error 3.30719 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 928.72396 464.362 42.4559 

Error 3 32.81253 10.938 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.0063 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 71.333504 5.48132 13.01 0.0010 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.10017 0.01134 -8.84 0.0031 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 0.0000403 0 8.07 0.0040 

05749A.B02 A4-12 
Total Entrainment fish/hour B Reservoir Size in acres 

45 

40 

-.... 

:J 

0 

.c: 35 

.c: 

-

Cl) 

s 

-

c 

CD 30 E 

c 

-~ 

-

c 

w .cooke 25 

"' ... 

0 

~ 

20 

.Foote 

15 

10~----~----~----~----~~~~~~~----~~--~ 

05749A.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

500 1000 1500 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size 

Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

A4-13 

2000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.349402 

Root Mean Square Error 5.290994. 

Mean of Response 17.124 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 45.10327 45.1033 1.6111 

Error 3 83.98385 27.9946 Prob>F 

C Total 4 129.08712 0.2939 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.6207339 7.10474 1.21 0.3118 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0067219 0.0053 1.27 0.2939 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.747485 

Root Mean Square Error 4.037107 

Mean of Response 17.124 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 96.49065 48.2453 2.9602 

Error 2" 32.59647 16.2982 Prob>F 

C Total 4 129.08712 0.2525 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>Jtl 

Intercept 75.656731 38.1401 1.98 0.1857 

Reservoir Size (in acres} -0.107412 0.0644 -1.67 0.2373 

Reservoir Size (in acres}"2 0.000043 0.00002 1.78 0.2178 

05749A.B02 A4-14 
Total Entrainment 

·Lower 

11 

10 

-.... 

:J 

0 

.c: 

:c 

9 II) 

:::.. 

-c: 

Q) 

E 

c: ·e 8 -

c: 

w .cro (ij 

0 

1-

7 

6 

·Pixley 

54-----~------r-----~----~----~r-----~----~----~ 

05749A.B02 

50 100 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

150 200 250 300 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

-- Polynomial Rt, degree=2 

F"IShlhr by Reservoir Size 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-15 

350 400 450 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.362426 

Root Mean Square Error 2.230421 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 8.483669 8.48367 1.7053 

Error 3 14.924331 4.97478 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.2827 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 10.356978 2.27973 4.54 0.0200 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.009479 0.00726 -1.31 0.2827 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.789935 

Root Mean Square Error 1.567993 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Va_riance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 18.490793 9.24540 3.7604 

Error 2 4.917207 2.45860 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.2101 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 15.294742 2.92553 5.23 0.0347 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.062574 0.02681 -2.33 0.1447 

Reservoir Size (in acres)A2 0.000102 0.00005 2.02 0.1811 

05749A.B02 A4-16 
Total Entrainment 

'i:" 

:::J 

2000 

~ 1500 

rn 

E 

'E 

Q) 

E 

c 

e 

'E 

UJ 1000 

'iii 

~ 

500 

0~~----~------~--------r-------~------~------~ 

05749A.B02 

0 2000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

4000 6000 8000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size 

Broad River Sites 

A4-17 

10000 1200 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999518 

Root Mean Square Error 28.08383 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 4909287.8 4909288 6224.519 

Error 3 2366.1 789 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -84.49763 14.6463 -5.77 0.0104 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.2258757 0.00286 78.90 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999995 

Root Mean Square Error 3.522926 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 4911629.1 2455815 197873.9 

Error 2 24.8 12 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 34.878227 8.88353 3.93 0.0592 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.057637 0.02064 -2.79 0.1079 

Reservoir Size (in acres)l\2 0.0000239 0 13.73 0.0053 

05749A.B02 A4-18 
Total Entrainment 

.99 Islands 

18 

'C' 16 ;::, 

0 

.£: 

.£: 

-t/) 

:;:: 

--c 14 Q) 

E 

c 

~ 

-c 

w 

1iS 12 ;§ 

10 

.Saluda 8~------~------~------.-------,------.-------.+-----~ 

05749A.B02 

250 300 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

350 400 450 500 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Size 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-19 

550 600 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.683961 

Root Mean Square Error 3.31487 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 47.561343 47.5613 4.3283 

Error 2 21.976732 10.9884 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.1730 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 30.866984 8.08555 3.82 0.0623-

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.037526 0.01804 -2.08 0.1730 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.872687 

Root Mean Square Error 2.975412 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 60.685000 30.3425 3.4273 

Error 1 8.853075 8.8531 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.3568 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>Jtl 

Intercept -8.768652 33.3533 -0.26 0.8363 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.1592442 0.16242 0.98 0.5063 

Reservoir Size (in acres)l\2 -0.000232 0.00019 -1.22 0.4377 

05749A.B02 A4-20 
Entrainment Rate Reservoir Size 

Bu 

600 

500 

.!!l 

0 

~ 400 .... 

'C' 

.c 

.... 

.c 

rn 

;;:: 

-Q) 300 7ii 

a: 

-c: 

Q) • French Landing E 

c: 200 ·~ 

-

c: 

w 

100 

0 .Hardy 

-100~------~--------r-------~------~--------~------~ 

05749A.B02 

0 2000 

Fitting 

-Linear Rt 

4000 6000 8000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size 

All Data 

A4-21 

10000 1200 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.77985 

Root Mean Square Error 48.74145. 

Mean of Response 32.56477 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 328211.50 328211 138.1519 

Error 39 92653.43 2376 Prob>F 

C Total 40 420864.92 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -14.70664 8.60927 -1.71 0.0955 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0491125 0.00418 11.75 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

Summary of Fit 1 

Rsquare 0.853407 

Root Mean Square Error 40.2936 

Mean of Response 32.56477 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2. 359169.10 179585 110.6106 

Error 38 61695.82 1624 Prob>F 

C Total 40 420864.92 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.008025 9.23755 1.19 0.2408 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0029519 0.01112 0.27 0.7921 

Reservoir Size (in acres)A2 0.0000044 0 4.37 0.0001 

05749A.B02 A4-22 
Entrainment Rate 

200 

.!1 

~ 150 

'C 

..c: 

..c: 

-(/) 

1;:: 

-.!! 

cu 

a: 100 -c:: 

(I) 

E 

c:: 

-~ 

-c:: 

w 

50 

0 

05749A.B02 

0 500 1000 

Fitting 

- Linear Frt. 

• French Landing 

1500 2000 2500 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

• Youghiogheny 

3000 3500 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size 

w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-23 

4000 
(Linear Fit ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.085429 

Root Mean Square Error 39.08584' 

Mean of Response 17.80264 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 5422.601 5422.60 3.5495 

Error 38 58052.695 1527.70 Prob>F 

C Total 39 63475.296 0.0672 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.3285136 8.31266 0.88 0.3835 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0149316 0.00793 1.88 0.0672 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.129358 

Root Mean Square Error 38.64749 

Mean of Response 17.80264 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2· 8211.037 4105.52 2.7487 

Error 37 55264.258 1493.63 Prob>F 

C Total 39 63475.296 0.0771 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -2.860804 11.0983 -0.26 0.7980 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0432456 0.02215 1.95 0.0585 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 -0.000009 0 -1.37 0.1801 

05749A.B02 A4-24 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs By Reservoir Size (in acres) 

J!1 

~ -.::::-

.&: 

~ UJ 

;;::: 

-Cl) 

a; 

·a: 

E 

Q) 

E 

c: 

~ 

-c: 

w 

250~--------------------------------------------------~ 

• French Landing 

200-

150-

100-

so-

.Prickett 

. :' ~:bb:e:o:ill~e~===::.::==--~::::::::::::----:---

0- ?.(;·;. ·. . . . : =- ~f 

I 

0 500 

Fitting 

-- Unear Fit . 

I 

1000 

I I I 

1500 2000 2500 

Reservoir Size (in acres} 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Size 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

I I 

3000 3500 4000 

05749A.B02 A4-25 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.011707 

Root Mean Square Error 37.46773 

Mean of Response 15.2143 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 582.003 582.00 0.4146 

Error 35 49134.074 1403.83 Prob>F 

C Total 36 49716.077 0.5239 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.504783 8.43402 1.36 0.1812· 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0055152 0.00857 0.64 0.5239 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.071781 

Root Mean Square Error 36.84123 

Mean of Response 15.2143 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 3568.688 1784.34 1.3147 

Error 34 46147.389 1357.28 Prob>F 

C Total 36 49716.077 0.2819 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 0.2868792 11.2233 0.03 0.9798 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0355016 0.0219 1.62 0.1142 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 -0.000009 0 ·1.48 0.1472 

05749B.B02 A4-26 
Entrainment Rate 

40 

35 

~ 

~ 30 ....... 

'C' 

.r:. 

-.r:. 

en 

I;: 25 -

CD 

as 

a: 

- 20 c: 

CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 15 -c: 

w 

10 

5 

0 

05749B.B02 

.Prickett 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

0 

Fitting 

-linear Fit 

•• .Rogers 

500 1000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Size 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-27 

.Roths 

1500 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.032053 

Root Mean Square Error 11.01528 

Mean of Response 8.502351 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 16 

(A~alysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 56.2509 56.251 0.4636 

Error 14 1698.7081 121.336 Prob>F 

C Total 15 1754.9590 0.5071 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.1377442 4.4322 1.38 0.1878 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0053347 0.00784 0.68 0.5071 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.088767 

Root Mean Square Error 11.09115 I 

Mean of Response 8.502351 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 155.7821 n.891 0.6332 

Error 13 1599.1769 123.014 Prob>F 

C Total 15 1754.9590 0.5465 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 0.6433028 7.56487 0.09 0.9335 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0275866 0.02597 1.06 0.3074 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 -0.000014 0.00002 -0.90 0.3847 

05749B.B02 A4-28 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

.; 10.0 

.a: 

c 

CD 

E 

c: ·e E 7.5 

w 

5.0 

Reservoir Size 

.cooke 

.Foote 

2.5~----~----~----~------r-----T-----~-----r----~ 

05749B.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

500 1000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

1500 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhrlkcfs by Reservoir Size 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-29 

2000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.409005 

Root Mean Square Error 4.035754 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 45.08729 45.0873 2.7682 

Error 4 65.14925 16.2873 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.1715 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.582048 3.63985 3.46 0.0259. 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.004928 0.00296 -1.66 0.1715 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.956927 

Root Mean Square Error 1.258073 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model '2 105.48829 52.7441 33.3244 

Error 3 4.74824 1.5827 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.0089 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.388869 2.08512 11.22 0.0015 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.030948 0.00431 -7.18 0.0056 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 0.0000117 0 6.18 0.0085 

05749B.B02 A4-30 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

~ 12.5 

..c: 

~ ...... 

..c: 

Cl) 

!E. 

Q) 

(ij 10.0 

a: 

'E 

Q) 

E 

c: 

-~ 

"E 7.5 

w 

5.0 

in acres 

.cooke 

.Foote 

2.5;------r----~-----,------r-~--~----~----~----~ 

05749B.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

500 1000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

1500 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Size 

Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

A4-31 

2000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.000195 

Root Mean Square Error 1.975245. 

Mean of Response 5.369724 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.002279 0.00228 0.0006 

Error 3 11.704776 3.90159 Prob>F 

C Total 4 11.707056 0.9822 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.3092776 2.65236 2.00 0.1391 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0000478 0.00198 0.02 0.9822 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.654529 

Root Mean Square Error 1.422049 

Mean of Response 5.369724 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 7.662610 3.83130 1.8946 

Error 2 4.044446 2.02222 Prob>F 

C Total 4 11.707056 0.3455 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 31.191621 13.4346 2.32 0.1460 

Reservoir Size {in acres) -0.044019 0.02269 -1.94 0.1919 

Reservoir Size {in acres)"2 0.0000166 0 1.95 0.1910 

05749B.B02 A4-32 
Entrainment Rate 

12 

11 

~ u 10 ..ll:: 

-c. 

.c 

...... 

.c 

C/) 9 s 

CD 

Cii 

a: 

-

c: 8 

CD 

E 

c: 

·a 

... 7 -

c: 

w 

6 

5 

4 

05749B.B02 

50 100 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

150 

• Thornapple 

200 250 300 350 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Size 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-33 

.up 

.cro 

400 450 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.462892 

Root Mean Square Error 2.678238 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 18.545439 18.5454 2.5855 

Error 3 21.518869 7.1730 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.2062 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.959659 2.73745 4.37 0.0222. 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.014015 0.00872 -1.61 0.2062 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.816399 

Root Mean Square Error 1.917792 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 32.708457 16.3542 4.4466 

Error 2 7.355852 3.6779 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.1836 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.833926 3.57817 4.98 0.0380 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.07718 0.03279 -2.35 0.1428 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 0.0001213 0.00006 1.96 0.1887 

05749B.B02 A4-34 
Entrainment Rate 

700 

600 

500 

-

-~ 300 

E 

c:: 

l~ 

'E 

w 

200 

100 

Bu: 

04-~----~--------,-------~--------,-------~--------~ 

05749B.B02 

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 

Fitting 

--Linear Frt 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Reservoir Size 

Broad River Sites 

A4-35 

10000 1200 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999762 

Root Mean Square Error 4.90912 

Mean of Response 130.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 303281.39 303281 12584.57 

Error 3 72.30 24 Prob>F 

C Total 4 303353.69 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -17.31496 2.5602 -6.76 0.0066 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0561414 0.0005 112.18 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.999957 

Root Mean Square Error 2.553146 

Mean of Response 130.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 303340.65 151670 23267.47 

Error 2 13.04 7 Prob>F 

C Total 4 303353.69 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 1.6772239 6.4381 0.26 0.8188 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0110358 0.01496 0.74 0.5376 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 0.0000038 0 3.02 0.0946 

05749B.B02 A4-36 
Entrainment Rate 

11 

.saluda 

10 

9 

~ u 

~ 

-.:::-

:E 

.J:::. 

en 8 

:::.. 

~ c: 

-

c:::: 

Q) 7 

E 

c:::: 

·e 

-

c:::: 

w 

6 

5 

4,_------~------~------~----~~~~--~------~------~ 

05749B.B02 

250 300 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

350 400 450 500 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 

-Polynomial. Fit. degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Size 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-37 

550 600 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.343002 

Root Mean Square Error 2.586919 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations ·(or Sum Wgts} 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source · DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 6.987606 6.98761 1.0442 

Error 2 13.384296 6.69215 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.4143 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 0.9740997 6.30994 0.15 0.8915 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0143836 0.01408 1.02 0.4143 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.772067 

Root Mean Square Error 2.154861 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 15.728478 7.86424 1.6936 

Error . 1 4.643424 4.64342 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.4774 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 33.321231 24.1552 1.38 0.3993 

Reservoir Size (in acres) -0.146203 0.11763 -1.24 0.4313 

Reservoir Size (in acres)"2 0.0001897 0.00014 1.37 0.4010 

05749B.B02 A4-38 
Total Entrainment fish/hour 

90 

80 

70 

..::-

::I 

0 

.c: 

....... 

.c: 60 (/) 

;;::: 

--

c: 

CD 50 E 

c: ·e 

c 40 w 

(ij 

-0 

1- 30 

20 

10 

0 

05749B.B02 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

• Five Channels 

. . . 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Rt 

• 

. . 

. . . . . 

5 

.cooke 

10 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Length 

All Data 

A4-39 

.Hardy 

15 20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.04687 

Root Mean Square Error 20.6616 

Mean of Response 17.06735 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 671.767 671.767 1.5736 

Error 32 13660.860 426.902 Prob>F 

C Total 33 14332.627 0.2188 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.202086 6.03926 3.84 0.0005 

Reservoir Length On miles) -1.401753 1.11745 -1.25 0.2188 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of _Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.047717 

Root Mean Square Error 20.98288 

Mean of Response 17.06735 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model _2 683.909 341.955 0.7767 

Error 31 13648.718 440.281 Prob>F 

C Total 33 14332.627 0.4687 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 24.290946 8.97803 2.71 0.0110 

Reservoir Length On miles) -1.844294 2.89636 -0.64 0.5290 

Reservoir Length (in miles)"2 0.029029 0.1748 0.17 0.8692 

05749B.B02 A4-40 
100 

90 

80 

70 

'i:" 

:::a 

0 

.r:: 

.r:: 

- 60 

(/) 

!5. 

-

c 

CD 50 E 

c ·e 

c: 40 w 

a; 

-

{:!. 30 

20 

10 

0 

05749B.B02 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

• Five Channels 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

·. 

5 

.cooke 

10 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Length 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-41 

.Hardy 

15 20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.03569 

Root Mean Square Error 21.38261 

Mean of Response 16.50419 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 31 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 490.733 490.733 1.0733 

Error 29 13259.264 457.216 Prob>F 

C Total 30 13749.997 0.3088 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 22.05938 6.59555 3.34 0.0023 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -1.224828 1.18226 -1.04 0.3088 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.035695 

Root Mean Square Error 21.76103 

Mean of Response 16.50419 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 31 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 490.808 245.404 0.5182 

Error 28 13259.189 473.542 Prob>F 

C Total 30 13749.997 0.6012 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 21.967226 9.91799 2.21 0.0351 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -1.188396 3.12726 -0.38 0.7068 

Reservoir Length (in miles)"2 -0.002348 0.18605 -0.01 0.9900 

05749B.B02 A4-42 
Total Entrainment Reservoir Len 

100 

.centralia 

90 

80 • Wisconsin River Division 

70 

-.:::-

:I 

0 

..c: 60 ....... 

..c: 

1/) 

:E. 

-c:: 

CD 50 E 

c:: 

·~ 

-c:: 

w 40 

tU 

-0 

1--

30 

20 

• White Rapids 

.Prickett 

10 

• Escanaba Dam 1 .Rogers .c 

04-------~~------~------~~--~--~------~-----+--~ 

05749B.B02 

0 1 

Fitting 

--Linear Fit 

2 3 4 

Reservoir Length {in miles) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Length 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-43 

5 6 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.026548 

Root Mean Square Error 31.553 

Mean of Response 20.84692 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 298.664 298.664 0.3000 

Error 11 10951.510 995.592 Prob>F 

C Total 12 11250.174 0.5948 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 30.119958 19.0585 1.58 0.1423 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -3.013736 5.50243 -0.55 0.5948 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.140976 

Root Mean Square Error 31.08724 

Mean of Response 20.84692 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

Analysis of Variance J 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1586.008 793.004 0.8206 

Error 10 9664.166 966.417 Prob>F 

C Total 12 11250.174 0.4678 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -5.353086 36.017 -0.15 0.8848 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 25.796005 25.5436 1.01 0.3364 

Reservoir Length (in miles)"2 -4.432163 3.84017 -1.15 0.2753 

05749B.B02 A4-44 
Total Entrainment fish/hour 

45 

40 

-... 

:::J 

0 35 .s::: 

....... 

.s::: 

C/) 

;;: 

--

s:: 

Cl) 30 E 

s:: 

e! 

..... 

s:: 

w 25 tu 

-

~ 

20 

15 

05749B.B02 

• Five Channels 

3 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

4 5 6 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Reservoir Length 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-45 

7 8 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.136617 

Root Mean Square Error 13.10494 

Mean of Response 23.27857 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 7 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 135.87582 135.876 0.7912 

Error 5 858.69787 171.740 Prob>F 

C Total 6 994.57369 0.4145 

(Parameter Estimates ) l 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl I 

Intercept 36.114445 15.2572 2.37 0.06421 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -2.76465 3.10817 -0.89 0.4145' 

j 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.636144 

Root Mean Square Error 9.511593 

Mean of Response 23.27857 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 7 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 632.69206 316.346 3.4967 

Error 4 361.88163 90.470 Prob>F 

C Total 6 994.57369 0.1324 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 119.74532 37.3665 3.20 0.0328 

Reservoir Length ~n miles} -39.47841 15.8285 -2.49 0.0672 

Reservoir Length (in miles)"2 3.6033744 1.53768 2.34 0.0791 

057498.802 A4-46 
·Lower 

11 

10 

'C" 

::I 

0 

.s:: 

..... 

J:: 

Ul 9 =.. 

-t:: 

Q) 

E 

t:: ··e 8 'E 

w 

(ij 

-0 

1-

7 

6 

·Pixley 

51--------.-------r------~------~--------~------.------

05749B.B02 

1 2 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

3 4 5 

Reservoir Length Qn miles) 

Fisblhr by Reservoir Length 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-47 

6 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 

Root Mean Square Error 

Mean of Response 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

0.63215~ 

2.892609 

7.933333 

3 

Source 

Model 

Error 

D F Sum of Squares 

1 14.379478 

1 8.367188 

Mean Square 

14.3795 

8.3672 

C Total 2 22.746667 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term 

Intercept 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

057498.802 

Estimate 

11.962311 

-0.851192 

A4-48 

Std Error 

3.4978 

0.6493 

F Ratio 

1.7186 

Prob>F 

0.4149 

t Ratio 

3.42 

-1.31 

Prob>ltl 

0.1811 

0.4149 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Reservoir Length (in miles) 

-;:::-

::J 

0 

.r. 

-.r. 

Ul 

e.. 

-c 

Q) 

E 

c 

-~ 

-c 

w 

(ij 

-0 

r13,-----------------------------------------------------~ 

.Holliday's Bridge 

12-

11-

10-

g-

.Saluda 

8~----.-,--~~---.-,--~~--~.----~----~,-----r----~,~--~ 

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 

Fitting 1 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

Fishlhr by Reservoir Length 

Broad River Sites 

05749B.B02 A4-49 
05749B.B02 A4-50 
Entrainment Rate 

45 

40 

35 

.!!! 

0 30 

..:.:: 

:c. 

.c: 

...... 

.c: 

en 25 E 

Q) 

as 

.a: 

-

c:: 20 

Q) 

E 

c:: "ii! 

-

c:: 15 

w 

10 

5 

.Prickett 

.Kleber 

.centralia 

. . . 

. 

. 

· .. 

.Abbeville 

.Saluda 

.Buchanan 

,_----~--~--.-----~----~~----~----~-=~--T·~H=ar=d~~ 

05749C.B02 

0 5 10 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

Fitting 

--linear Fit · 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Length 

All Data 

A4-51 

15 20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.071233 

Root Mean Square Error 10.09667. 

Mean of Response 10.03695 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 250.1971 250.197 2.4543 

Error 32 3262.1663 101.943 Prob>F 

C Total 33 3512.3634 0.1270 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 13.780877 2.95119 4.67 0.0001 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -0.855467 0.54606 -1.57 0.1270 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.075665 

Root Mean Square Error 10.23372 

Mean of Response 10.03695 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2· 265.7625 132.881 1.2688 

Error 31 3246.6009 104.729 Prob>F 

C Total 33 3512.3634 0.2954 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ftl 

Intercept 15.013688 4.37875 3.43 0.0017 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -1.356513 1.4126 -0.96 0.3443 

Reservoir Length (in miles)l\2 0.0328668 0.08525 0.39 0.7025 

05749C.B02 A4-52 
Entrainment Rate 

45 

40 

35 

J!! 30 .i! 

-;:::-

..&:: -..&:: 

(I) 25 !5. 

Q) 

a; 

cr:: 

- 20 c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·~ 15 'E 

w 

10 

5 

0 

05749C.B02 

.Prickett 

.Kleber 

.centralia 

.Tower 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

• .. 

.Abbeville 

.Saluda 

.Buchanan 

5 10 

Reservoir Length {in miles) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Length 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-53 

15 20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.06402 

Root Mean Square Error 10.40718 

Mean of Response 9.971235 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 31 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 214.8376 214.838 1.9836 

Error 29 3140.9713 108.309 Prob>F 

C Total 30 3355.8089 0.1696 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 13.64686 3.21013 4.25 0.0002 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -0.810415 0.57542 -1.41 0.1696 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.066106 

Root Mean Square Error 10.57958 

Mean of Response 9.971235 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 31 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 221.8384 110.919 0.9910 

Error 28 3133.9705 111.928 Prob>F 

C Total 30 3355.8089 0.3839 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 14.534641 4.82184 3.01 0.0054 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -1.161386 1.52038 -0.76 0.4513 

Reservoir Length (in miles)A2 0.0226215 0.09045 0.25 0.8043 

05749C.B02 A4-54 
Entrainment Rate 

40 

35 

.:a 30 

~ 'C' 

.c. .._ 

.c. 

fiJ 25 s 

CD 

·ca 

a: 

-c 

CD 

E 

c 

-~ 

-

c 

w 

20 

15 

10 

5 

. . 

.Prickett 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

• .Rogers 

olliday's 8 

0,_----~----------~------------~--~-------,------~ 

05749C.B02 

0 1 2 3 4 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Reservoir Length 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-55 

5 6 
(linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00001 

Root Mean Square Error 12.51231. 

Mean of Response 9.171986 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.0173 0.017 0.0001 

Error 11 1722.1381 156.558 Prob>F 

C Total 12 1722.1553 0.9918 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.1014884 7.55764 1.20 0.2538 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 0.0229118 2.18198 0.01 0.9918. 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.160033 

Root Mean Square Error 12.02728 

Mean of Response 9.171986 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 275.6011 137.801 0.9526 

Error 10 1446.5543 144.655 Prob>F 

C Total 12 1722.1553 0.4181 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept .. 

-7.311135 13.9345 -0.52 0.6112 

Reservoir Length Qn miles) 13.352567 9.88252 1.35 0.2064 

Reservoir Length (in miles)"2 -2.050667 1.48572 -1.38 0.1976 

05749C.B02 A4-56 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

~ 12.5 

.s:; 

~ ..... 

.s:; 

(/) 

!!:.. 

-m 10.0 

a: 

E 

.CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 

E 7.5 

w 

5.0 

.Five Channels 

.station 26 

-Alcon a 

.cook 

2.5+----r--..----,----.---,-----.---..----.-----.----.-----1 

05749C.B02 

3 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

4 5 6 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Length 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-57 

7 8 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.336865 

Root Mean Square Error 4.820627 

Mean of Response 8.425835 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 7 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 59.02437 59.0244 2.5399 

Error 5 116.19221 23.2384 Prob>F 

C Total 6 175.21658 0.1719 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 16.885828 5.61232 3.01 0.0298 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -1.822152 1.14333 -1.59 0.1719 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.74101 

Root Mean Square Error 3.368209 

Mean of Response 8.425835 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 7 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 129.83726 64.9186 5.7223 

Error 4 45.37932 11.3448 Prob>F 

C Total 6 175.21658 0.0671 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 48.459488 13.2321 3.66 0.0215 

Reservoir Length ~n miles) -15.68292 5.60514 -2.80 0.0489 

Reservoir Length (in miles)"2 1.3604032 0.54452 2.50 0.0669 

05749C.B02 A4-58 
13 

.Lower 

12 

11 

IIJ 

- 10 

.s= 

~ ...... 

.s= 

IIJ 9 s 

CD 

ai .Pixley a: 

·C: 

- 8 

CD 

E 

c: 

"i~ 

c 7 

w 

6 

5 

4 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Fish/hr!kcfs by Reservoir Length 

Flambeau River Sites 

05749C.B02 A4-59 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 

Root Mean Square Error 

Mean of Response 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

0.626586 

2.059434 

9.957786 

3 

Source 

Model 

Error 

D F Sum of Squares 

1 7.116828 

1 4.241269 

Mean Square 

7.11683 

4.24127 

C Total 2 11.358097 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term 

Intercept 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

05749C.B02 

Estimate 

12.792221 

-0.598824 

A4-60 

Std Error 

2.49031 

0.46228 

F Ratio 

1.6780 

Prob>F 

0.4185 

t Ratio 

5.14 

-1.30 

Prob>ltl 

0.1224 

0.4185 
Entrainment Rate {fish/hr)/kcfs By Reservoir Length {in miles) 

JQ 

0 

.l!E 

-... 

.t::. 

....... 

.t::. 

(J) 

E. 

Q) 

ca 

a: 

-c 

Q) 

E 

c 

e 

-

c 

w 

10.5~------------------------------------------------~ 

10.0-

9.5-

9.0-

8.5-

8.0- • Holliday's Bridge 

I 

5.0 

Fitting 1 

I I I 

5.5 6.0 6.5 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Reservoir Length 

Broad River Sites 

.saluda 

I 

7.0 

05749C.B02 A4-61 
05749C.B02 A4-62 
Total Entrainment 

2500 

2000 

~ 1500 ::I 

0 

.c: 

:c 

f/) 

;;:: 

-

i 1000 c: 

~ 

'E 

w 

'iii 

~ 500 

0 

• Youghiogheny 

-Hardy 

-500~------,-------,-------~------~-------r-------r-------

-50000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

0 50000 100000 150000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

- Polynomial Fit. degree=2 

05749C.B02 

Fishlhr by Total Storage 

All Data 

A4-63 

200000 250000 30( 
(Linear Fit ) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.680559 

Root Mean Square Error 230.7482 

Mean of Response 84.35316 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 4083712.5 4083712 76.6970 

Error 36 1916810.8 53245 Prob>F 

C Total 37 6000523.3 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -54.1136 40.6345 -1.33 0.1913 

Total Storage -(in ac-ft) 0.006383 0.00073 8.76 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

A square 0.977954 

Root Mean Square Error 61.47817 

Mean of Response 84.35316 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 5868238.5 2934119 776.3114 

Error 35 132284.8 3780 Prob>F 

C Total 37 6000523.3 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 58.549445 12.0038 4.88 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.007428 0.00066 -11.18 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 6e-8 0 21.73 0.0000 

05749C.B02 A4-64 
• Yol!ghiogheny 

200 

150 

-;:::-

::I 

0 

.z= 

....... 

.z= 

~ 

-

E 

Q) 

E 

c:: 

-~ 100 

-

c:: 

w 

1U 

-

0 • Wisconsin River Division 

1-

50 .Five Channels 

.Hard 0~----~------,-----~-----.------~~~~----~----~ 

0 50000 100000 150000 20000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Total Storage 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

05749C.B02 A4-65 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.389211 

Root Mean Square Error 28.36411 

Mean of Response 19.27622 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 17943.238 17943.2 22.3030 

Error 35 28158.289 804.5 Prob>F 

C Total 36 46101.527 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.8300715 5.16106 1.71 0.0960 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0006972 0.00015 4.72 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.462196 

Root Mean Square Error 27.00414 

Mean of Response 19.27622 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 21307.924 10654.0 14.6100 

Error 34 24793.604 729.2 Prob>F 

C Total 36 46101.527 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.217459 6.27615 2.74 0.0096 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000626 0.00063 -0.99 0.3289 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 9.4e-9 0 2.15 0.0389 

05749C.B02 A4-66 
Total Entrainment 

...:::-

:::J 

0 

.c 

::c 

U) 

==.. 

-c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

~ 

-c: 

w 

tii 

~ 

ao • Wisconsin River Division 

70 

60 

50 

40 

30 

20 

• Five Channels 

·'. . . ... . . 

. . 

0~----~------r-----~----------~--~~.------r----~ 

0 50000 100000 150000 20000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft} 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Total Storage 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

05749C.B02 A4-67 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.005969 

Root Mean Square Error 15.07845 

Mean of Response 13.91222 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 46.4168 46.417 0.2042 

Error 34 n30.2315 227.360 Prob>F 

C Total 35 7n6.6482 0.6543 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 14.477831 2.80759 5.16 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac·ft) ·0.00005 0.00011 .0.45 0.6543 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.025519 

Root Mean Square Error 15.15395 

Mean of Response 13.91222 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 198.4548 99.227 0.4321 

Error 33 7578.1934 229.642 Prob>F 

C Total 35 7776.6482 0.6528 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.711276 3.56024 3.57 0.0011 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0002352 0.00037 0.64 0.5274 

Total Storage (in ac·ft)"2 ·2.3e-9 0 -0.81 0.4217 

05749C.B02 A4-68 
Total Entrainment 

"i:" 

::s 

0 

~ ...... 

~ 

II) 

e 

-c: 

Q) 

E 

c: "ii! 

c 

w 

ai -0 

1-

80 • Wisconsin River Division 

70 

60 

50 

40 

30 

20 

.Five Channels 

. . ·'! 

:. 

.cooke 

.Hardy 

0~--------.---------,--------.---------.---------r------~ 

05749C.B02 

0 25000 50000 75000 1 00000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Total Storage 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-69 

125000 1500C 
(Linear Fit ) 

..... (Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.004894 

Root Mean Square Error 15.2606 

Mean of Response 13.72765 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 36.6480 36.648 0.1574 

Error 32 7452.3456 232.886 Prob>F 

C Total 33 7488.9936 0.6942 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 14.249049 2.92868 4.87 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000045 0.00011 -0.40 0.6942 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.030877 

Root Mean Square Error 15.30102 

Mean of Response 13.72765 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of· Variance J 

Source D.F Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 231.2388 115.619 0.4938 

Error 31 7257.7548 234.121 Prob>F 

C Total 33 7488.9936 0.6150 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.199078 3.69848 3.30 0.0024 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0002804 0.00037 0.75 0.4593 

Total Storage (in ac-ft).l\2 -2.6e-9 0 -0.91 0.3690 

05749C.B02 A4-70 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Bv Total Storaae (in ac-ft) 

90~----------------------------------------------------

80-

70-

'C' 60- :::l 

0 

.r: 

::c 

(/) 

s 50-

-c:: 

Cl) 

E 

c:: ·e 4oc: 

w 

Cii 

~ 30-

20-

10-

.wisconsin River Division 

.Roth 

~ 

~ 

• .White 

.Holliday's 

Rapids 

Bndg~ 

~ 

~ricke 

.Rogers 

04-------~,--------~,--------~,-------~,------~,~----~ 

0 2500 5000 7500 1 0000 12500 15001 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Frt 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Total Storage 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

05749C.B02 A4-71 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.001629 

Root Mean Square Error 20.98645 

Mean of Response 14.49429 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 8.6252 8.625 0.0196 

Error 12 5285.1712 440.431 Prob>F 

C Total 13 5293.7963 0.8910 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 15.343499 8.26344 1.86 0.0880 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.00017 0.00121 -0.14 0.8910 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.026176 

Root Mean Square Error 21.64848 

Mean of Response 14.49429 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model .2 138.5716 69.286 0.1478 

Error 11 5155.2248 468.657 Prob>F 

C Total 13 5293.7963 0.8643 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 19.53899 11.6681 1.67 0.1222 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.002729 0.00502 -0.54 0.5975 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 0.0000002 0 0.53 0.6089 

05749C.B02 A4-72 
Total Entrainment fish/hour 

Five Channels 

45 

40 

'C" 

:::s 

0 35 .c 

....... 

.c 

(I) 

:;::::: 

--

c: 30 Q) 

E 

c: 

·a; 

.... 

-c: 

w .cooke 25 

as 

-0 

t20 

.Loud 

.Foote 

15 

104-----~----~~----~----~----~~~~~----~ 

05749C.B02 

0 5000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 3500 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Total Storage 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-73 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.282908 

Root Mean Square Error 13.12927 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 272.02598 272.026 1.5781 

Error 4 689.51051 172.378 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.2774 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 35.215839 11.5301 3.05 0.0379 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000677 0.00054 -1.26 0.2774 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.947861 

Root Mean Square Error 4.087915 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 911.40334 455.702 27.2695 

Error 3 50.13314 16.711 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.0119 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 71.880649 6.92991 10.37 0.0019 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.006494 0.00096 -6.80 0.0065 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 0.0000002 0 6.19 0.0085 

05749C.B02 A4-74 
Total Entrainment 

-.... 

::J 

0 

.c ..._ 

.c 

en 

~ --c: 

Q) 

E 

c: ·e 

-c: 

w 

a; 

-

0 

1-

05749C.B02 

45 

40 

35 

30 

25 .cooke 

20 

.Loud 

.Foote 

15 

10,_----~------.-----~~--~----~~~~------~ 

0 5000 

Fitting 

-- Unear Fit 

10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 3500 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Total Storage 

Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

A4-75 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.117914 

Root Mean Square Error 6.160788 

Mean of Response 17.124 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) .. 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 15.22119 . 15.2212 0.4010 

Error 3 113.86593 37.9553 Prob>F 

C Total 4 129.08712 0.5715 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.382626 7.9n99 1.55 0.2184 

Total Storage (in ac-ft} 0.0002163 0.00034 0.63 0.5715 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.620205 

Root Mean Square Error 4.951091 

Mean of Response 17.124 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 80.06052 40.0303 1.6330 

Error 2 49.02660 24.5133 Prob>F 

C Total 4 129.08712 0.3798 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 65.091758 33.0372 1.97 0.1876 

Total Storage {in ac-ft) -0.005752 0.00368 -1.56 0.2585 

Total Storage {in ac-ft}"2 0.0000001 0 1.63 0.2454 

05749D.B02 A4-76 
Total Entrainment 

.Lower 

11 

10 

9 

8 

.Crowley 

7 

r 

6 

.Pixley 

5~------~-----T--~--~------~---+~------~----~ 

05749D.B02 

500 1000 

Fitting 

-UnearFit 

1500 2000 2500 3000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Total Storage 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-77 

3500 4000 
(Linear Fit ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.251461 

Root Mean Square Error 2.416734 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis ·of Variance ) .. 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 5.886197 . 5.88620 1.0078 

Error 3 17.521803 5.84060 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.3894 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.5267627 2.1336 4.47 0.0209 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.00091 0.00091 -1.00 0.3894 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.905892 

Root Mean Square Error 1.049497 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 21.205111 10.6026 9.6260 

Error 2 2.202889 1.1014 Prob>F 

CTotal 4 23.408000 0.0941 

a Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 16.372681 2.05627 7.96 0.0154 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.010444 0.00259 -4.04 0.0562 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 0.0000023 0 3.73 0.0650 

05749D.B02 A4-78 
Total Entrainment 

-;:::-

:::1 

0 

2000 

~ 1500 

en 

s 

'E 

CD 

E 

c 

e 

an - 1ooo 

a; 

~ 

500 

0~----~~----~------~----~------~----~ 

0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 30000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

-Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

~------~--~~==~----

057490.802 

Fishlhr by Total Storage 

Broad River Sites 

A4-79 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999523 

Root Mean Square Error 27.93413 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis. of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 4909313.0 4909313 6291.447 

Error 3 2340.9 780 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -27.44788 14.2115 -1.93 0.1490 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0093291 0.00012 79.32 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999999 

Root Mean Square Error 1.21401 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 4911651.0 2455825 1666299 

Error 2 2.9 1 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.682897 1.4246 16.62 0.0036 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.002294 0.00029 -7.86 0.0158 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)A2 4.2e-8 0 39.83 0.0006 

05749D.B02 A4-80 
Total Entrainment 

18 

'C' 16 :::2 

0 

€ 

.c 

(/) 

;;::: 

-..... 

c:: 14 Q) 

E 

c:: 

·a 

..... 

-

c:: 

w 

1ij 

12 ~ 

10 

Sal 

81---~~--------~--~----~--~----~----r---~----~--~ 

2000 3000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

4000 5000 6000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlbr by Total Storage 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

05749D.B02 A4-81 

7000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

A square 0.964421 

Root Mean Square Error 1.112225 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 67.063988 67.0640 54.2131 

Error 2 2.474087 1.2370 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.0180 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 22.976305 1.29043 17.81 0.0031 

Total Storage (in ac-ft} -0.001902 0.00026 -7.36 0.0180 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.99643 

Root Mean Square Error 0.49822 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 69.289851 34.6449 139.5715 

Error 1 0.248224 0.2482 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.0597 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 15.944354 2.41837 6.59 0.0958 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0019735 0.0013 1.52 0.3707 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)/\2 -4.2e-7 0 -2.99 0.2052 

05749D.B02 A4-82 
$ 

~ "i:' 

.c: 

....... 

.c: 

en 

:=.. 

Q) 

·-cu 

a: 

c 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·a; 

.... 

'E 

w 

.Buzzar 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

0 .Hardy 

-100~------.-------~------~------.-------.-------------~ 

-50000 0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

50000 100000 150000 

Total Storage {in ac-ft) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/brlk.cfs by Total Storage 

All Data 

200000 250000 300( 

05749D.B02 A4-83 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.734185 

Root Mean Square Error 53.06343 

Mean of Response 28.3814 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 279975.39 279975 99.4327 

Error 36 101366.20 2816 Prob>F 

C Total 37 381341.59 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -7.874435 9.34441 -o.84 0.4050 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0016713 0.00017 9.97 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.967168 

Root Mean Square Error 18.91354 

Mean of Response 28.3814 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 368821.31 184411 515.5136 

Error 35 12520.28 358 Prob>F 

C Total 37 381341.59 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.264032 3.69292 4.67 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.00141 0.0002 -6.90 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft}"'2 1.3e-8 0 15.76 0.0000 

05749D.B02 A4-84 
--

Entrainment Rate 

• Youghiogheny 

125 

J!l 

(.) 100 ~ -;::::-

.c 

.c 

-(/) 

s 

* 75 

a: 

-

c: 

(l) 

E 

c: 

·e 

50 'E 

w 

.Prickett 

25 

o~----~------.-----~----~------~-4~~----~----~ 

05749D.B02 

0 50000 100000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-85 

150000 20000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.375759 

Root Mean Square Error 17.99366 

Mean of Response 12.30927 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 6821.241 6821.24 21.0681 

Error 35 11332.009 323.77 Prob>F 

C Total 36 18153.250 0.0001 

(Parameter Estimates ) ! 

I 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.8685088 3.27408 1.79 0.0817 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0004299 0.00009 4.59 0.0001 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.445586 

Root Mean Square Error 17.205 

Mean of Response 12.30927 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model "2 8088.840 4044.42 13.6630 

Error 34 10064.409 296.01 Prob>F 

C Total 36 18153.250 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.01659 3.99869 2.76 0.0094 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000382 0.0004 -0.95 0.3491 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)A2 5.7e-9 0 2.07 0.0462 

05749D.B02 A4-86 
Entrainment Rate 

45 

40 

35 

~ ,:,(. 30 

:c. 

..c: 

:c 

s 25 

CD 

(ij 

a: 

E 20 

CD .E 

c ·e 

c 15 

w 

10 

5 

0 

.Prickett 

.Abbeville 

.. .. 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

50000 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

100000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fishlhrlkcfs by Total Storage 

150000 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

05749D.B02 A4-87 

20000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

A square 0.009632 

Root Mean Square Error 9.72588.1 

Mean of Response 8.964044 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 31.2780 31.2780 0.3307 

Error 34 3216.1536 94.5928 Prob>F 

C Total 35 3247.4316 0.5691 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.4283433 1.81095 5.21 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000041 0.00007 -o.58 0.5691 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.033833 

Root Mean Square Error 9.750773 

Mean of Response 8.964044 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 109.8717 54.9358 0.5778 

Error 33 3137.5599 95.0776 Prob>F 

C Total 35 3247.4316 0.5667 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.1582233 2.29083 3.56 0.0011 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.000164 0.00024 0.69 0.4937 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 -1.6e-9 0 -0.91 0.3698 

05749D.B02 A4-88 
Entrainment Rate 

• Prickett 

40 

35 

.Abbeville 

30 

0 "' .::t:. 

'C' 

--.r:. 

.r:. 

-- 25 

:e "' 

"Q) 

a; 

a: 

-

c: 20 Q) 

E 

c: 

"ffi 

~ 

E 

w 15 

10 

5 .Foote 

.. 

~--------~--------r-------~--------~---------r--__ H_a_rd~y~ 

05749D.B02 

0 25000 . 50000 75000 1 00000 125000 150 

Fitting 

--Linear Fit 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Total Storage 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-89 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.009264 

Root Mean Square Error 9.841927 

Mean of Response 9.007843 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 28.9840 28.9840 0.2992 

Error 32 3099.6327 96.8635 Prob>F 

C Total 33 3128.6168 0.5882 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.4715325 1.88878 5.01 0.0000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.00004 0.00007 -0.55 0.5882 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.039278 

Root Mean Square Error 9.846777 

Mean of Response 9.007843 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 122.8872 61.4436 0.6337 

Error 31 3005.7296 96.9590 Prob>F 

C Total 33 3128.6168 0.5374 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.0474781 2.38011 3.38 0.0020 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0001861 0.00024 o.n 0.4456 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 -1.8e-9 0 -0.98 0.3327 

05749D.B02 A4-90 
Entrainment Rate 

CD 

as 

cr: 

40 

35 

'E 20 

CJ) 

E 

c: ·e 

- 15 c:: 

w 

10 

5 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Pricke 

.Roth 

.Rogers 

0,_------~------~r-------~-------r-------.------~ 

0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 1500 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fitting 

-- Linea,r .Fit 

-- Polynomial Rt, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

05749D.B02 A4-91 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.239968 

Root Mean Square Error 9.42922 

Mean of Response 7.625004 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 336.8629 336.863 3.7888 

Error 12 1066.9224 88.910 Prob>F 

C Total 13 1403.7852 0.0754 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 2.3178763 3.71277 0.62 0.5441 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.001061 0.00055 1.95 0.0754 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.380777 

Root Mean Square Error 8.889501 

Mean of Response 7.625004 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 534.5297 267.265 3.3821 

Error 11 869.2555 79.023 Prob>F 

C Total 13 1403.7852 0.0716 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.4923668 4.79124 1.56 0.1462 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.002096 0.00206 -1.02 0.3311 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)l\2 0.0000002 0 1.58 0.1421 

05749D.B02 A4-92 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

en 0 12.5 

~ .s:: 

:c 

en 

~ 

. .; 10.0 

a: 

E 

(I) 

E 

c 

·~ 

E 7.5 

w 

5.0 

.Five Channels 

.cooke 

.Foote 

2.5,_----~------,-----,----~~~~------------~ 

05749D.B02 

0 5000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 3500 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-93 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.480563 

Root Mean Square Error 3.783546 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 52.97565 52.9756 3.7007 

Error 4 57.26089 14.3152 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.1267 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.841287 3.32272 3.86 0.0181 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) ·0.000299 0.00016 ·1.92 0.1267 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.937307 

Root Mean Square Error 1.517796 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 103.32543 51.6627 22.4259 

Error 3 6.91111 2.3037 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.0157 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.130202 2.573 8.99 0.0029 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.001931 0.00035 -5.45 0.0122 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)i'2 4.5e-8 0 4.68 0.0185 

057490.802 A4-94 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

•Q) 

as 1o.o 

a: 

c 

Q) 

E 

c:: 

"i~ 7 5 c . w 

5.0 

.Loud .cooke 

.Foote 

2.5~----~------r-----~----~------~----~----~ 

05749D.B02 

0 5000 

Fitting 

-- Unear Fit 

10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 3500 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr /k:cfs by Total Storage 

Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

A4-95 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.057919 

Root Mean Square Error 1.917376 

Mean of Response 5.369724 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.678060 0.67806 0.1844 

Error 3 11.028996 3.67633 Prob>F 

C Total 4 11.707056 0.6966 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.3704468 2.48293 2.57 0.0828 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000046 0.00011 -0.43 0.6966 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.429469 

Root Mean Square Error 1.827463 

Mean of Response 5.369724 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 5.027813 2.51391 0.7528 

Error 2 6.679242 3.33962 Prob>F 

C Total 4 11.707056 0.5705 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 20.02253 12.1941 1.64 0.2423 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.001591 0.00136 -1.17 0.3620 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 3.7e-8 0 1.14 0.3720 

057490.802 A4-96 
Entrainment Rate 

.Lower 

12 

11 

en 10 ~ -;:::::-

.s:; 

....... 

.s:; 

en 9 ;;::: .Upper -Q) 

1U 

a: 

.... 

c 8 

Q) 

E 

c 

·e 

7 .... 

r::: 

w 

6 

5 • Thornapple .crowley 

4~------~----~------~----~~----~------~----~ 

057490.002 

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-97 

3500 4000 
(Linear Fit ) 

..... Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.174446 

Root Mean Square Error 3.320405 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 6.989050 6.9890 0.6339 

Error 3 33.075258 11.0251 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.4841 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 10.014045 2.9314 3.42 0.0420 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000992 0.00125 -0.80 0.4841 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.241655 

Root Mean Square Error 3.897599 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 9.681760 4.8409 0.3187 

Error 2 30.382548 15.1913 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.7583 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.884247 7.63651 1.69 0.2336 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.004989 0.00961 -0.52 0.6553 

Total Storage (in ac-ft}.l\2 0.0000009 0 0.42 0.7147 

05749D.B02 A4-98 
Entrainment Rate 

600 

500 

t .s:::. 

-

~ 400 

E 

CD 

as 

.a: 

1: 300 CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 

-c: 

w 200 

100 

Buzzar 

0~-------.--------r-------~------~--------r-------~ 

057490.802 

0 50000 100000 150000 200000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft} 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Total Storage 

Broad River Sites 

A4-99 

250000 30000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999353 

Root Mean Square Error 7.130597 

Mean of Response 111.3464 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 314084.87 314085 6177.25 

Error 4 203.38 51 Prob>F 

C Total 5 314288.26 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Sid Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -0.196897 3.23858 -0.06 0.9544. 

Total Storage {in ac-ft) 0.0023076 0.00003 78.60 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999748 

Root Mean Square Error 5.140645 

Mean of Response 111.3464 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 314208.98 157104 5945.021 

Error 3 79.28 26 Prob>F 

C Total 5 314288.26 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Sid Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.0888613 4.87974 1.86 0.1594 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000066 0.0011 -0.06 0.9560 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)"2 8.7e-9 0 2.17 0.1188 

057490.802 A4-100 
Entrainment Rate 

·CD 

1U 

a: 

-c: 

CD 

E 

c: 

e 

-c: 

w 

10 

9 

7 

• G.aston Shoals 

6 

5 

.99 Islands 

.sa 1 

• Holliday's Bridge 

4~--------.----.----~--~---.----.---~----r----r--~ 

05749E.B02 

2000 3000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

4000 5000 6000 

Total Storage (in ac·ft) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Total Storage 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-101 

7000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.823097 

Root Mean Square Error 1.342357 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 16.768058 16.7681 9.3057 

Error 2 3.603844 1.8019 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.0928 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 2.9977463 1.55743 1.92 0.1941 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0009512 0.00031 3.05 0.0928 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.841928 

Root Mean Square Error 1.794499 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 17.151677 8.57584 2.6631 

Error 1 3.220225 3.22023 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.3976 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.9170318 8.71052 0.68 0.6201 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) -0.000658 0.00468 -0.14 0.9111 

Total Storage (in ac-ft)A2 0.0000002 0 0.35 0.7884 

05749E.B02 A4-102 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By_ Plant Flow (in cfsl 

2500,------------------rt~~~~~~~~~~uu~~·------------------~ 

2000-

'C' 1500- ::::s 

0 

~ 1/) 

;;:: 

-

1: 

Q) 1 ooo- .e 

c: 

·e 

c 

w 

~ 500-

o- ~··' ---~==---- ............. . , 

-5004----~,---,~--~,----~,--~,----~,--~,----~,----r-,--~,--~ 

05749E.B02 

0 1 000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 1 0000 11 001 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Frtting 

--Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fisblhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

All Data 

A4-103 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.016843 

Root Mean Square Error 384.6259 

Mean of Response 83.86833 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 101377.8 101378 0.6853 

Error 40 5917483.1 147937 Prob>F 

C Total 41 6018861.0 0.4127 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.11948 100.12 0.17 0.8651 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0269273 0.03253 0.83 0.4127 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.038454 

Root Mean Square Error 385.2209 

Mean of Response 83.86833 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 231449.3 115725 0.7798 

Error 39 5787411.7 148395 Prob>F 

C Total 41 6018861.0 0.4655 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -73.2061 139.151 -0.53 0.6018 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0965419 0.08118 1.19 0.2415 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 -0.000009 0 -0.94 0.3549 

05749E.B02 A4-104 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Bv Plant Flow (in cfs) 

• Youghiogheny 

200-

• French Landing 

...::- 150- ::::1 

0 

=E 

.c: 

Ul 

:e. 

-c 

Q) 

E 

.c 

a! 100- ..... .centralia 

'E 

w 

a! ·Wise 

-0 

..... 

so- • Five Channels 

.Be~ . . . . .. . . aWhi• . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . 0 . I I I I I 

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fisblhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Hawks Nest 

05749E.B02 A4-105 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00444 

Root Mean Square Error 44.89698 

Mean of Response 25.61925 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis. of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 341.649 341.65 0.1695 

Error 38 76598.068 2015.74 Prob>F 

C Total 39 76939.717 0.6829 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 20.931123 13.4189 1.56 0.1271 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.002081 0.00505 0.41 0.6829 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.005112 

Root Mean Square Error 45.48431 

Mean of Response 25.61925 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 393.296 196.65 0.0951 

Error 37 76546.421 2068.82 Prob>F 

C Total 39 76939.717 0.9095 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.849703 22.9352 1.04 0.3051 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.001192 0.02134 -0.06 0.9558 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 0.0000006 0 0.16 0.8753 

05749E.B02 A4-106 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Plant Flow (in cfs) 

..:::-

::l 

0 

~ 

.r:: 

-(I) 

;;::: 

--

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

-~ 

-

c 

w 

ca 

~ -

200,----------------------------------------------------. 

• French Landing 

150-

100- .Centralia 

.Wise 

50- • Five Channels 

0,_--~------,~------.--~~---.-,--~--------~------~ 

0 1 000 2000 3000 4000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynom•at Frt, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

5000 

05749E.B02 A4-107 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.022908 

Root Mean Square Error 33.79239 

Mean of Response 20.24946 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 937.043 . 937.04 0.8206 

Error 35 39967.392 1141.93 Prob>F 

C Total 36 40904.435 0.3712 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.312695 10.3744 1.19 0.2433 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0035676 0.00394 0.91 0.3712 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.04103 

Root Mean Square Error 33.9663 

Mean of Response 20.24946 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1678.311 839.16 0.7274 

Error 34 39226.124 1153.71 Prob>F 

C Total 36 40904.435 0.4906 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.212785 17.1364 1.35 0.1845 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.00895 0.01611 -0.56 0.5822 

Plant Flow (in cfs)A2 0.0000024 0 0.80 0.4284 

OS749E.B02 A4-108 
Total Entrainment 

100 

90 

80 

70 

-;::-

::I 

0 

.z:: 

........ 

.z:: 60 

(f) 

:::.. 

-

c 50 Q) 

E 

c ·e 

-c 40 w 

1U 

-0 

1- 30 

20 

10 

0 

05749E.B02 

• Prickett 

1000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

.centralia 

• Rothschild 

• Gaston Shoals 

.Rogers 

2000 3000 4000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fisblhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-109 

.Wise 

.Whi I 

5000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.425995 

Root Mean Square Error 21.77983 

Mean of Response 18.96937 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 4928.620 4928.62 10.3900 

Error 14 6641.054 474.36 Prob>F 

C Total 15 11569.674 0.0061 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -11.91458 11.0204 -1.08 0.2979 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.013335 0.00414 3.22 0.0061 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.426197 

Root Mean Square Error 22.59802 

Mean of Response 18.96937 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 4930.958 2465.48 4.8279 

Error 13 6638.715 510.67 Prob>F 

C Total 15 11569.674 0.0270 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -13.48692 25.8975 -0.52 0.6113 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0147146 0.02083 0.71 0.4925 

Plant Flow (in cfs)l\2 -2.3e-7 0 -0.07 0.9471 

05749E.B02 A4-110 
90 

80 

70 

"C' 

:::J 

0 

..c: 

..._ 

..c: 60 

(/) 

s 

-c 

CD 50 E 

·c 

e 

..... 

c 40 w 

as 

-0 

.... 30 

20 

10 

0 

05749E.B02 

• Prickett 

1000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

• 

.centralia 

.Rogers 

2000 3000 4000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

w/o Wisconsin River Division 

A4-lll 

.Whi I 

5000 
(Linear Fit ) 

....... (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.236_187 

Root Mean Square Error 21.01728 

Mean of Response 14.86067 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis. of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 1775.6782 . 1775.68 4.0199 

Error 13 5742.4395 441.73 Prob>F 

C Total 14 7518.1177 0.0662 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltr 

Intercept -5.545318 11.5341 -0.48 0.6387 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0095845 0.00478 2.00 0.0662 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.266287 

Root Mean Square Error 21.44011 

Mean of Response 14.86067 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 2001.9758 1000.99 2.1n6 

Error 12 5516.1419 459.68 Prob>F 

C Total 14 7518.1177 0.1560 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -21.05662 25.0434 -0.84 0.4169 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0236053 0.02057 1.15 0.2735 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 -0.000002 0 -0.70 0.4963 

05749E.B02 A4-112 
Total Entrainment 

50 

• Rve Channels 

45 

40 

'C' 

::I 

0 35 .c 

-.c 

II) 

s 

-

c 

CD 30 E 

c 

-~ 

-c 

w 25 a; 

-0 

1-

20 

15 

.Mio 

10~------~------~----~~~--~------~-------r------~ 

2500 3000 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

05749E.B02 

3500 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Fishlhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-113 

4000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.001429 

Root Mean Square Error 15.49324 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 1.37405 . 1.374 0.0057 

Error 4 960.16243 240.041 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.9433 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 25.414245 40.4478 0.63 0.5639 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.000947 0.01252 -0.08 0.9433 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.100314 

Root Mean Square Error 16.98117 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 96.45565 48.228 0.1672 

Error 3 865.08083 288.360 Prob>f 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.8534 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -174.0009 350.097 -0.50 0.6533 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.1225249 0.21546 0.57 0.6094 

Plant Flow (in cfs)l\2 -0.000019 0.00003 -0.57 0.6060 

OS749E.B02 A4-114 
Total Entrainment fish/hour 

-;::-

~ 

0 

.r:. 

:t= 

IJ) 

;:::: 

--

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

~ 

-

c 

w 

a; 

;§ 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

s~----~----~----~----~----~----~--~~--~-----4 

600 700 

Fitting 

--Linear Fit 

800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

Flambeau River Sites 

05749E.B02 A4-115 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.014198 

Root Mean Square Error 2.773424 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.332354 0.33235 0.0432 

Error 3 23.075646 7.69188 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.8486 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.8857388 4.01728 1.71 0.1850 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.000763 0.00367 0.21 0.8486 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.811564 

Root Mean Square Error 1.485077 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 18.997093 9.49855 4.3068 

Error 2 4.410907 2.20545 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.1884 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -32.61194 13.7465 -2.37 0.1410 

Plant Flow (in cfs} 0.0817473 0.02791 2.93 0.0995 

Plant Flow (in cfs)A2 -0.000037 0.00001 -2.91 0.1006 

05749E.B02 A4-116 
Total Entrainment 

'C" 

:::1 

0 

.c 

..... 

.c 

en 

!!:.. 

-

c 

CD 

E 

c 

·~ 

-c 

w 

1U 

0 

1-

2500 

2000 

1500 

1000 

500 

0~--~~~--~~wu~~~~~~~~~-----.----~~~~ 

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Fitting 

-UnearFit 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

Broad River Sites 

05749E.B02 A4-117 
- . .. 

(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.213949 

Root Mean Square Error 1134.432 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 1050843.2 1050843 0.8165 

Error 3 3860810.7 1286937 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.4328 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -383.9496 1111.75 -0.35 0.7526 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.3288132 0.36388 0.90 0.4328 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.220499 

Root Mean Square Error 1383.589 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1083016.3 541508 0.2829 

Error 2 3828637.6 1914319 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.7795 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -700.9644 2796.12 -0.25 0.8255 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.6525692 2.53647 0.26 0.8210 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 -0.00006 0.00047 -0.13 0.9087 

05749E.B02 A4-118 
Total Entrainment 

.99 Isla · 

18 

'1:" 16 ::J 

0 

.s:; 

-.s:; 

1/J 

:;;:: 

--c: 

Q) 14 E 

c: ·e 

c 

w 

a; 

- 12 ~ 

10 

a~~~~--~-----r----~--~----~----~--~~--~ 

500 1 000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Fitting 

- Linear F.it - Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Hydraulic Capacity 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

05749E.B02 A4-119 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare o.812e26 

Root Mean Square Error 2.551048 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 56.522380 56.5224 8.6853 

Error 2 13.015695 6.5078 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.0984 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.8908013 2.55128 3.09 0.0906 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0027152 0.00092 2.95 0.0984 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.995349 

Root Mean Square Error 0.568684 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 69.214673 34.6073 107.0103 

Error 1 0.323402 0.3234 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.0682 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 1.5050512 1.16726 1.29 0.4200 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0092247 0.00106 8.71 0.0728 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"'2 -0.000001 0 -6.26 0.1008 

05749E.B02 A4-120 
.. Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs By Plant Flow (in cfs) 

~ 

~ ..:::::-

.c: 

.c: 

-(/) 

;;::: 

-Q) 

ai 

a: 

-c: 

Q) 

E 

c: ·e 

-c: 

w 

700.----------------------------------------------------. 

• Buzzard's Roost 

600-

500-

400-

300-

• French Landing 

200-

• Youghiogheny 

100-

:=" . o- ., ....... ·. . .... .. . ... I -----.Hawks 

-100~--~~----~~---r-l--~l.---,l----~l----~l---.-l---.-l--,l----~ 

0 1 000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 1 0000 11 001 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

All Data 

05749E.B02 A4-121 
(Linear Fit ) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.000916 

Root Mean Square Error 102.5617 

Mean of Response 32.16345 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 385.86 385.9 0.0367 

Error 40 420756.41 10518.9 Prob>F 

C Total 41 421142.27 0.8491 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 28.045458 26.6972 1.05 0.2998 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0016612 0.00867 0.19 0.8491 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.006414 

Root Mean Square Error 103.5821 

Mean of Response 32.16345 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 2701.14 1350.6 0.1259 

Error 39 418441.13 10729.3 Prob>F 

C Total 41 421142.27 0.8821 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 15.994489 37.4164 0.43 0.6714 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.010949 0.02183 0.50 0.6188 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 -0.000001 0 -0.46 0.6448 

05749E.B02 A4-122 
Entrainment Rate 

.French Landing 

200 

~ 

~ -.... 150 

..c: 

-..c: 

(/) • Youghiogheny 

:0:: 

-Q) 

a; 

a: 100 -c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

l~ 

-

c: 

w 50 

.centralia 

• Five Channels .wis ... . ., • • • rl • .wh· 0 • . . . 

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 

Plant Flow ~n cfs) 

Fitting 

- Unear.Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Hawks Nest 

05749E.B02 A4-123 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.06185 

Root Mean Square Error 39.49312 

Mean of Response 18.18162 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 3907.424 3907.42 2.5052 

Error 38 59268.856 1559.71 Prob>F 

C Total 39 63176.280 0.1218 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 34.036185 11.8038 2.88 0.0064 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.007038 0.00445 -1.58 0.1218 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.080196 

Root Mean Square Error 39.62997 

Mean of Response 18.18162 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 40 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 5066.507 2533.25 1.6130 

Error 37 58109.n4 1570.53 Prob>F 

C Total 39 63176.280 0.2130 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 47.862596 19.9832 2.40 0.0218 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.022541 0.01859 -1.21 0.2330 

Plant Flow On cfs)l\2 0.000003 0 0.86 0.3958 

OS749E.B02 A4-124 
Entrainment Rate 

250 

200 

~ C!!: 150 

'C' 

J: 

:£: 

~ CD 

a; 

a: 100 -

c 

CD 

E 

c 

Cii 

... 

c 

w 

50 

0 

05749E.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

.French Landing 

1000 

.centralia 

2000 3000 4000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

- Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-125 

iscc 

5000 
(Linear Fit ) 

-- (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.062753 

Root Mean Square Error 36.48728 

Mean of Response 15.2143 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 3119.811 3119.81 2.3434 

Error 35 46596.266 1331.32 Prob>F 

C Total 36 49716.077 0.1348 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 29.696277 11.2017 2.65 0.0120 

Plant Flow (in cfs} -0.00651 0.00425 -1.53 0.1348 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.101966 

Root Mean Square Error 36.23725 

Mean of Response 15.2143 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 5069.366 2534.68 1.9302 

Error 34 44646.711 1313.14 Prob>F 

C Total 36 49716.077 0.1607 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 47.373348 18.2822 2.59 0.0140 

Plant Flow (in cfs} -0.02681 0.01719 -1.56 0.1281 

Plant Flow On cfs)"2 0.000004 0 1.22 0.2314 

I. 

05749F.B02 A4-126 
Entrainment Rate 

40 

35 

Ul 30 ~ 'C" 

-.s:::: 

.r; 

-

Ul 25 ~ 

-Q) 

a; 

a: 

-c: 20 

Q) 

E 

c: 

"i!! 

- 15 c: 

w 

10 

5 

05749F.B02 

.Prickett 

1000 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

.centralia 

2000 3000 4000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

- Polynomial Rt, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-127 

.Whi 

5000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.000059 

Root Mean Square Error 11.19584 

Mean of Response 8.502351 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.1027 0.103 0.0008 

Error 14 1754.8564 125.347 Prob>F 

C Total 15 1754.9590 o.sn6 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.3613958 5.66499 1.48 0.1621 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0000609 0.00213 0.03 0.9776 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.141925 

Root Mean Square Error 10.76278 

Mean of Response 8.502351 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 249.0720 124.536 1.0751 

Error 13 1505.8871 115.837 Prob>F 

C Total 15 1754.9590 0.3698 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 24.585958 12.3342 1.99 0.0676 

Plant Flow {in cfs) -0.014174 0.00992 -1.43 0.1767 

Plant Flow (in cfs).l\2 0.0000024 0 1.47 0.1664 

05749F.B02 A4-l28 
Entrainment Rate 

40 

35 

C/) 

-0 30 

.:.:: 

....... 

-;:::-

.c. .centralia ....... 

..c 

C/) 25 e. 

Q) 

a; 

a: 

-c: 20 

Q) 

E 

c: 

f!! 15 .Wis 

-c: 

w 

10 

5 

04---~----~--~~--~----~----~--~----~--~----~ 

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 

Plant Flow (in cfs} 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only w/o Prickett 

05749F.B02 A4-129 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.239375 

Root Mean Square Error 5.980685 

Mean of Response 6.319434 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis . of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 146.33696 146.337 4.0912 

Error 13 464.99172 35.769 Prob>F 

C Total 14 611.32868 0.0642 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 0.4138102 3.30292 0.13 0.9022 

Plant Aow (in cfs) 0.0024327 0.0012 2.02 0.0642 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.282843 

Root Mean Square Error 6.044411 

Mean of Response 6.319434 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 172.90984 86.4549 2.3664 

Error 12 438.41884 36.5349 Prob>F 

C Total 14 611.32868 0.1360 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -6.743579 9.03196 -0.75 0.4697 

Plant Flow (in cfs} 0.008268 0.00695 1.19 0.2572 

Plant Flow (in cfs)A2 -9.3e-7 0 -0.85 0.4104 

05749F.B02 A4-130 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

!/) :g 12.5 

"\:' 

:E 

.s:: 

!/) 

=.. 

CD 

a; 10.0 

cc 

-

c 

CD 

E 

c 

·e 

- 75 c . w 

5.0 .Mio 

• Five Channels 

.Foote 

.Alcon a 

2.5,_----~r------.------~-----.------.------.------~ 

05749F.B02 

2500 

Fitting 

-Linear F~ 

3000 3500 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-l31 

4000 
(Linear Fit ) 

- (Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.060069 

Root Mean Square Error 5.089566 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis. of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 6.62182 6.6218 0.2556 

Error 4 103.61471 25.9037 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.6397 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl · 

Intercept 13.817363 13.2872 1.04 0.3571 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.002079 0.00411 -0.51 0.6397 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.137132 

Root Mean Square Error 5.630855 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of v-ariance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 15.11697 7.5585 0.2384 

Error 3 95.11957 31.7065 Prob>F 

rC Total 5 110.23654 0.8015 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -45.78938 116.09 -0.39 0.7196 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0348278 0.07145 0.49 0.6593 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 -0.000006 0.00001 -0.52 0.6405 

05749F.B02 A4-132 
Entrainment Rate 

.Lower 

12 

11 

t 

10 

.c 

..... 

.c 

Cl) 9 

!E. 

~ a: 

-

c: 8 Q) 

E 

c: 

l~ 

-

c: 

w 7 

6 

5 

4~----~-----T----~------~----~----~----~----~----~ 

600 700 BOO 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

05749F.B02 

Plant Flow (in cfs} 

Fishlhrlkcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-133 

• 

1400 1501 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.461449 

Root Mean Square Error 2.681832 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 18.487643 18.4876 2.5705 

Error 3 21.576666 7.1922 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.2072 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 13.925546 3.88461 3.58 0.0372 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.005691 0.00355 -1.60 0.2072 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.894256 

Root Mean Square Error 1.455433 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 35.827738 17.9139 8.4568 

Error 2 4.236571 2.1183 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.1057 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -24.14476 13.4721 -1.79 0.2150 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0723671 0.02735 2.65 0.1181 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 -0.000036 0.00001 -2.86 0.1035 

05749F.B02 A4-134 
Entrainment Rate 

600 

500 

t 

:E 

~ 400 

;: 

·CD -

as 

a: 

E 300 Q) 

E 

c: ·e 

E 

w 200 

100 

• Buzzard's Roo 

o4-~~~~~~~~~~mu~~--~--~~ 

05749F.B02 

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishfhrlk:cfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

Broad River Sites 

A4-135 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.204641 

Root Mean Square Error 283.593 

Mean of Response 130.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 62078.66 62078.7 0.7719 

Error 3 241275.02 80425.0 Prob>F 

C Total 4 303353.69 0.4443 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -86.83058 277.923 -0.31 0.7752 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.0799193 0.09097 0.88 0.4443 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.210822 

Root Mean Square Error 345.9769 

Mean of Response 130.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 63953.59 31977 0.2671 

Error 2 239400.10 119700 Prob>F 

C Total 4 303353.69 0.7892 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -163.3595 699.19 -0.23 0.8370 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 0.1580755 0.63426 0.25 0.8264 

Plant Flow (in cfs)A2 -0.000015 0.00012 -0.13 0.9118 

05749F.B02 A4-136 
Entrainment Rate 

.Saluda 

10 

.!!2 

~ -. 

"C' 

.l:: 

-. 

.l:: 

(/) 

:=.. 

Q) 

Cii 

a: 

-c: 

Q) 

E 

c: ·e 

-c: 

w 

05749F.B02 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

44---~~--~----~--~----~----~--~--~~--~ 

500 1000 . 1500 

Fitting 

--Linear Fit· 

2000 2500 3000 3500 

Plant Flow On cfs} 

4000 4500 5000 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Hydraulic Capacity 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-l37 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.964565 

Root Mean Square Error 0.600785 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 19.650017 19.6500 54.4409 

Error 2 0.721885 0.3609 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.0179 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.124331 0.60084 18.51 0.0029 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.001601 0.00022 -7.38 0.0179 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.985621 

Root Mean Square Error 0.541236 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 4 

Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF ·Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 20.078965 10.0395 34.2718 

Error 1 0.292937 0.2929 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.1199 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.298267 1.11092 11.07 0.0574 

Plant Flow (in cfs) -0.002798 0.00101 -2.78 0.2202 

Plant Flow (in cfs)"2 0.0000002 0 1.21 0.4397 

05749F.B02 A4-138 
.... 

Total Entrainment 

2500 • Buzzard's Roost 

2000 

-;:::-

::l 

0 

s::. 

....... 

s::. 

(/) 1500 :;::: 

--c: 

Cl) 

E 

c: 

~ 1000 -

c: 

w 

a; 

{!. - 500 

• Youghiogheny 

0 .Hardy .Abbeville 

-500~----,-----,-----.------.-----.----~-----r----~ 

05749F.B02 

-10 0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

10 20 30 40 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Flush Rate 

All Data 

A4-139 

50 60 70 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.264938 

Root Mean Square Error 359.7827 

Mean of Response 88.73917 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 1586283.0 1586283 12.2546 

Error 34 4401082.0 129444 Prob>F 

C Total 35 5987365.1 0.0013 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -16.70332 67.1038 -Q.25 0.8049 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 20.035519 5.72335 3.50 0.0013 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.28977 

Root Mean Square Error 358.9718 

Mean of Response 88.73917 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1734959.8 867480 6.7319 

Error 33 4252405.3 128861 Prob>F 

C Total 35 5987365.1 0.0035 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -60.10756 78.2015 -0.77 0.4476 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 43.587193 22.6575 1.92 0.0630 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 ·-0.585916 0.54547 -1.07 0.2906 

05749F.B02 A4-140 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

3000~--------------------------------------------------. 

2500-

2000-

"C' 

:::J 

0 

.s:; 

..._ 

.s:; 

UJ 1500- ;;: 

--c 

CD 

·E 

c 

"e! 1000- -c 

w 

'"iii 

{!. - 500-

~ny ._.· •• ~ .. ~~c==-~a~a"m~y=====~--.--b~b~e-v-ille~-- o-

-5004------r-,----~.------~.----~.-------.~----~.----~.~--~ 

-10 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Frtting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fisblhr by Flush Rate 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

05749F.B02 A4-141 
(Linear Fit ) 

..... (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.466429 

Root Mean Square Error 27.18141 . 

Mean of Response 20.06886 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance ) . 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 21313.343 21313.3 28.8475 

Error 33 24381.355 738.8 Prob>F 

C Total 34 45694.698 0.0000 

. (Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.4265519 5.08016 1.66 0.1066 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 2.6211288 0.48802 5.37 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.754568 

Root Mean Square Error 18.72075 

Mean of Response 20.06886 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 34479.776 17239.9 49.1913 

Error 32. 11214.922 350.5 Prob>F 

C Total 34 45694.698 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 22.060922 4.14612 5.32 0.0000 

Reservoir Flush Rate {in days) -4.82774 1.26091 -3.83 0.0006 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 0.1795001 0.02929 6.13 0.0000 

05749F.B02 A4-142 
Total Entrainment 

80 Wisconsin River Division 

70 

-;:::- 60 

::I 

0 

..c 

]: 

Ul 

S 50 • Five Channels -c 

Q) 

E 

·c 

·~ 40 

-c 

w 

~ 30 

I20 

. . . 

. . 

.Hardy 

0~------.-----~,------.-------r------.-------~----~ 

05749F.B02 

0 5 

Fitting 

--Linear Fit 

10 15 20 25 30 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Flush Rate 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost, Abbeville and 

Youghiogheny 

A4-143 

35 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.009147 

Root Mean Square Error 15.36396 

Mean of Response 14.41265 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 69.7334 69.733 0.2954 

Error 32 7553.6367 236.051 Prob>F 

C Total 33 7623.3701 0.5905 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 15.169817 2.9805 5.09 0.0000 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -0.237357 0.4367 -0.54 0.5905 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.023648 

Root Mean Square Error 15.49515 

Mean of Response 14.41265 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 180.2n1 90.139 0.3754 

Error 31 7443.0929 240.100 Prob>F 

C Total 33 7623.3701 0.6901 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 16.628253 3.69535 4.50 0.0001 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -1.138009 1.39851 -0.81 0.4220 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 0.0303697 0.04476 0.68 0.5025 

05749F.B02 A4-144 
Total Entrainment 

90,---------------------------------------------------~ 

eo- Wisconsin River Division 

70-

- 50- • Five Channels 

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

··~ 40-

E 

w 

~ 30-

•• cooke 

20-

•• • .Foote 

i:::h,. 

• • ~Prickett Abl 

10- • • . . . . .. . . . 

• • .Hardy 

o~--------~----~,-------r-,----~,-------,r-----~,------~ 

05749F.B02 

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Flush Rate 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-145 

35 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.007176 

Root Mean Square Error 15.41132 

Mean of Response 13.98273 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 53.2164 53.216 0.2241 

Error 31 7362.7732 237.509 Prob>F 

C Total 32 7415.9897 0.6393 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 14.662349 3.04281 4.82 0.0000 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days} -0.207932 0.43928 -0.47 0.6393 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.018862 

Root Mean Square Error 15.5736 

Mean of Response 13.98273 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 139.8n6 69.939 0.2884 

Error 30 7276.1121 242.537 Prob>F 

C Total 32 7415.9897 0.7515 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 15.989798 3.79293 4.22 0.0002 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -1.010414 1.41398 -0.71 0.4804 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)l\2 ·0.0269991 0.04517 0.60 0.5545 

05749F.B02 A4-146 
Total Entrainment 

80 • Wisconsin River Division 

70 

'C' 60 ::l 

0 

€ 

.r::. 

C/) 

!5. 50 

t: 

Q) 

E . r:: · ·e 4o 

t: 

w 

~ 30 

20 

10 

• 

. 

.Rothschild 

o~~----~--------~--------r-------~--------~------~ 

05749F.B02 

0 2 

Frtting 

-Linear Fit 

4 6 8 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Flush Rate 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-147 

10 12 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.007176 

Root Mean Square Error 20.92807. 

Mean of Response 14.49429 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 37.9869 37.987 0.0867 

Error 12 5255.8094 437.984 Prob>F 

C Total 13 5293.7963 0.7734 

. (Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>Jtl 

Intercept 15.550793 6.64487 2.34 0.0374 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -0.614503 2.08659 -0.29 0.7734 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of ·Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.04442 

Root Mean Square Error 21.44474 

Mean of Response 14.49429 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 235.1517 117.576 0.2557 

Error 11 5058.6446 459.877 Prob>F 

C Total 13 5293.7963 0.7789 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 19.614157 9.21261 2.13 0.0567 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -5.883099 8.32561 -0.71 0.4945 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)A2 0.492519 0.75219 0.65 0.5261 

05749F.B02 A4-148 
Total Entrainment fish/hour 

45 

40 

'C' 

;:::, 

0 

..r:: 35 ..... 

..r:: 

en 

;;::: 

--c 30 Q) 

E 

c 

m 

.... 

- .coo c 

w 25 

1a -

0 

~ 

20 

.Loud 

15 

10;------r-----r-----.-----r-----.----~----~~~~ 

05749F.B02 

0.5 1.0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Flush Rate 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-149 

4.0 4.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.453885 

Root Mean Square Error 11.45763 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 436.42740 436.427 3.3245 

Error 4 525.10909 131.277 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.1423 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 42.175966 11.816 3.57 0.0234 

Reservoir Flush Rate {in days) -6.95406 3.81397 -1.82 0.1423 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.901932 

Root Mean Square Error 5.606411 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 867.24097 433.620 13.7956 

Error 3. 94.29552 31.432 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.0307 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 72.76485 10.0844 7.22 0.0055 

Reservoir Flush Rate {in days) -40.2114 9.17494 -4.38 0.0220 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"'2 . 6.6708946 1.80187 3.70 0.0342 

05749F.B02 A4-150 
Total Entrainment 

45 

40 

-

._ 

::l 

0 

.c 35 ..... 

.c 

UJ 

'!= 

--

c::: 

CD 30 E 

c::: 

·a 

.... 

-

c::: 

w .coo 25 

as 

-0 

1-

20 

.Loud 

15 

10~----,-----,-----,-----,-----~----~--~~~~~ 

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Fitting 

- Unear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate 

Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

05749G.B02 A4-151 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.082865 

Root Mean Square Error 6.281992 

Mean of Response 17.124 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 10.69685 10.6968 0.2711 

Error 3 118.39027 39.4634 Prob>F 

CTotal 4 129.08712 0.6386 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.261147 11.6062 0.97 0.4035 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 1.7874552 3.43324 0.52 0.6386 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.274219 

Root Mean Square Error 6.844304 

Mean of Response 17.124 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 35.39814 17.6991 o.3n8 

Error 2 93.68898 46.8445 Prob>F 

C Total 4 129.08712 0.7258 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 84.198914 101.236 0.83 0.4931 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -47.90497 68.5342 -0.70 0.5569 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 . 7.8800649 10.8517 0.73 0.5432 

05749G.B02 A4-152 
Total Entrainment 

..:::-

:;, 

0 

~ 

11 

10 

:E. 9 ... 

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

~ 8 

w 

1ii 

~ 7 

6 

•Lower 

.Thomapple 

Upper 

·Pixley 

54-----~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~--~ 

05749G.B02 

0.5 1.0 1.5 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-153 

2.0 2.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.362857 

Root Mean Square Error 2.229666. 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 8.493768 8.49377 1.7085 

Error 3 14.914232 4.97141 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.2823 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ftl 

Intercept 9.6298094 1.79428 5.37 0.0127 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -1.779023 1.36104 -1.31 0.2823 

Polynomial Fit, degree:2 J 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.491498 

Root Mean Square Error 2.439571 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 11.504990 5.75249 0.9666 

Error 2 11.903010 5.95151 Prob>F 

CTotal 4 23.408000 0.5085 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.316253 3.0782 3.68 0.0667 

Reservoir Rush Rate (in days) -5.957514 6.06019 -0.98 0.4292 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)l\2 . 1.6647005 2.34034 0.71 0.5507 

05749G.B02 A4-154 
Total Entrainment 

2500 

'§" 2000 

0 

€ 

.s::. 

UJ 

!£:, 

E 

~ 1500 c: ·e 

E 

w 

cu 

~ 1000 

500 

0~~~--.-------~------r------,------~------~------~ 

05749G.B02 

0 10 20 30 40 50 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Flush Rate 

Broad River Sites 

A4-155 

60 70 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.985132 

Root Mean Square Error 156.0219 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 4838625.4 4838625 198.7700 

Error 3 73028.5 24343 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.0008 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -114.764 82.6563 -1.39 0.2591 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 75.834666 5.37889 14.10 0.0008 ; . j 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 1 

(summary of Fit ) I 

Rsquare 0.999988 

Root Mean Square Error 5.426225 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 4911595.0 2455798 83405.94 

Error 2 58.9 29 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.0000 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 25.239809 4.02156 6.28 0.0245 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -14.85436 1.8313 -8.11 0.0149 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 . 2.5709175 0.05164 49.78 0.0004 

05749G.B02 A4-156 
Total Entrainment 

18 

..::- 16 ::J 

0 

E 

.c:: 

Cl) 

~ 

-c: 

CD 14 E 

c: 

! 

-c: 

w 

co 12 -0 

1-

10 

Salud 8~--~~---r----~--~----~----~--~--------~~--~ 

0 1 2 3 4 5 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Flush Rate 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

05749G.B02 A4-157 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.964313 

Root Mean Square Error 1.113917 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 67.056451 67.0565 54.0424 

Error 2 2.481624 1.2408 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.0180 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 18.693282 0.80677 23.17 0.0019 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days} -2.387083 0.32471 -7.35 0.0180 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999754 

Root Mean Square Error 0.130708 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations {or Sum Wgts} 4 

Analysis of Variance J . Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 69.520991 34.7605 2034.623 

Error 1 0.017084 0.0171 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.0157 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 19.827791 0.13373 148.27 0.0043 

Reservoir Flush Rate {in days) -4.518623 0.18151 -24.89 0.0256 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days}"2 . 0.4368901 0.03638 12.01 0.0529 

05749G.B02 A4-158 
Entrainment Rate 

• Buzzard's Roost 

600 

500 

~ 

~ 

=c. 400 

.c 

....... 

.c 

1/) 

;c 

-Q) 

a; 300 

a: 

-c:: 

Q) 

E 

200 c 

"! 

-

c:: 

w • Youghiogheny 

100 

·Abbeville 

0 .Hardy 

-100~----.------r----~----~----~------------.---~ 

05749G.B02 

-10 0 10 20 30 40 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Frtting 

- Linear f=it 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Flush Rate 

All Data 

A4-159 

50 60 70 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.374603 

Root Mean Square Error 83.58222 

Mean of Response 29.88386 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 142272.72 142273 20.3654 

Error 34 237523.56 6986 Prob>F 

C Total 35 379796.28 0.0001 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -1.694246 15.5891 -Q.11 0.9141 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 6.0002741 1.32961 4.51 0.0001 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.38758 

Root Mean Square Error 83.95432 

Mean of Response 29.88386 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 147201.44 73600.7 10.4423 

Error 33 232594.84 7048.3 Prob>F 

C Total 35 379796.28 0.0003 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -9.596982 18.2893 -0.52 0.6033 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 10.288396 5.29901 1.94 0.0608 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)A2 . -0.106679 0.12757 -0.84 0.4090 

05749G.B02 A4-160 
Entrainment Rate 

600 

500 

C/) 

~ ..._ 

-.... 400 

.r:. 

:c 

C/) 

;;:: 

-CD 

as 300 

a: 

... 

c:: 

Q) 

E 200 c:: 

"i~ 

-c: 

w 

100 

0 

-100~-----.----~----~------r-----~-----r----~----~ 

05749G.B02 

-10 0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

10 20 30 40 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Flush Rate 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-161 

50 60 70 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.687445 

Root Mean Square Error 13.01972 

Mean of Response 12.93626 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 12303.535 12303.5 72.5816 

Error 33 5593.936 169.5 Prob>F 

C Total 34 17897.470 0.0000 I 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 4.0906418 2.43336 1.68 0.1022 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 1.9914872 0.23376 8.52 0.000.0 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.803211 

Root Mean Square Error 10.4911 

Mean of Response 12.93626 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 14375.451 7187.73 65.3055 

Error 32 3522.019 110.06 Prob>F 

C Total 34 17897.470 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.4992702 2.32349 4.09 0.0003 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -0.96341 0.70661 -1.36 0.1823 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 0.071206 0.01641 4.34 0.0001 

05749G.B02 A4-162 
Entrainment Rate 

125 

.1'l 

0 

.::t:. .._ 100 

"C'" 

.r; 

.._ 

.r; 

f/) 

s 

Q) 75 1\1 

a: 

-t: 

Q) 

E 

t: 

e 50 

-t: 

w .Prickett 

.Kleber 

25 

0~----~----r---~~~~----~----~----~----~----~--~ 

05749G.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

10 20 30 40 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Flush Rate 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

A4-l63 

50 
(Linear Fit ) 

.... (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.069845 

Root Mean Square Error 8.844146 

Mean of Response 8.734445 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 182.0765 182.077 2.3278 

Error 31 2424.7864 78.219 Prob>F 

C Total 32 2606.8630 0.1372 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.9862502 1.91916 3.64 0.0010 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 0.7665485 0.50242 1.53 0.1372 

Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.131002 

Root Mean Square Error 8.689762 

Mean of Response 8.734445 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

Analysis of Variance J 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model ·2 341.5043 170.752 2.2613 

Error 30 2265.3587 75.512 Prob>F 

C Total 32 2606.8630 0.1217 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 4.652716 2.47687 1.88 0.0701 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 2.762924 1.45993 1.89 0.0681 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) ... 2 -0.152108 0.10468 -1.45 0.1566 

05749G.B02 A4-164 
Entrainment Rate 

45 

40 

35 

.sa 30 ~ 

:;=. 

.c 

...... 

.c 

(/) 25 ~ 

Q) 

-as 

a: 

... 

c: 20 

CD 

E 

c: 

e 

-

c: 15 

w 

10 

5 

0 

05749G.B02 

-Prickett 

.Kleber 

.Tower 

.cooke 

.Foote 

. . • 

. 

0 5 10 15 20 

Reservoir Aush Rate (in days} 

Fitting 

- Unear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhrlkcfs by Flush Rate 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-165 

.Ab 

25 30 35 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

A square 0.236505 

Root Mean Square Error 8.709298 

Mean of Response 9.216445 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 728.3852 728.385 9.6027 

Error 31 2351.4083 75.852 Prob>F 

C Total 32 3079.7935 0.0041 

Parameter Estimates l 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.7020982 1.71956 3.90 0.0005 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 0.7692698 0.24825 3.10 0.0041 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.242021 

Root Mean Square Error 8.821223 

Mean of Response 9.216445 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 745.3745 372.687 4.7895 

Error 30 2334.4190 77.814 Prob>F 

C Total 32" 3079.7935 0.0157 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.1143486 2.1484 2.85 0.0079 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 1.1245819 0.80091 1.40 0.1705 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 -0.011954 0.02558 -0.47 0.6437 

05749G.B02 A4-166 
Entrainment Rate 

40 

35 

(/) 30 -0 

~ 

--;:::-

.r:. 

-.r:. 25 (/) 

;;:: 

-

CD 

a; 

a: 

c 20 Q) 

E 

c 

~ 

-c 

w 15 

10 

0 

05749G.B02 

~Kleber 

.Tower 

.Cooke 

.Foote 

, 

0 5. 

Rtting 

-Linear Fit 

.Prickett 

10 15 20 25 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

- Polynomial Rt, degree=2 

Fisblhrlkcfs by Flush Rate 

w/o Clppeid Sites w/o Abbeville 

A4-167 

30 35 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.079675 

Root Mean Square Error 8.851708 

Mean of Response 8.510869 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 203.4953 203.495 2.5972 

Error 30 2350.5821 78.353 Prob>F 

c Total 31 2554.on3 0.1175 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.6111971 1.95909 3.37 0.0021 

Reservoir Flush Rate {in days) 0.8142178 0.50523 1.61 0.1175 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.15122 

Root Mean Square Error 8.646008 

Mean of Response 8.510869 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 386.2271 193.114 2.5833 

Error ·29 2167.8502 74.753 Prob>F 

C Total 31 2554.0n3 0.0928 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 4.0444047 2.5213 1.60 0.1195 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 2.9687159 1.46372 2.03 0.0518 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 -0.163604 0.10464 -1.56 0.1288 

05749G.B02 A4-168 
Entrainment Rate 

45 

40 

35 

!I) 

- 30 ~ 'C" 

..c 

..c 

-(/) 25 s 

Q) 

1ii 

0: 

- 20 c 

Q) 

E 

c ·e 15 -

c 

w 

10 

5 

0 

05749G.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

2 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Prickett 

4 6 8 10 12 

Reservoir Flush Rate Qn days) 

Fisblhr/kcfs by Flush Rate 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-169 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.751054 

Root Mean Square Error 5.396503 

Mean of Response 7.625004 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 1054.3183 1054.32 36.2032 

Error 12 349.4669 29.12 Prob>F 

C Total 13 1403.7852 0.0001 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 2.0590294 1.71344 1.20 0.2527 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 3.2373761 0.53805 6.02 0.000-1 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.867448 

Root Mean Square Error 4.112885 

Mean of Response 7.625004 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1217.7112 608.856 35.9933 

Error 11- 186.0741 16.916 Prob>F 

C Total 13 1403.7852 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.7580573 1.76689 3.26 0.0076 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -1.558817 1.59677 -0.98 0.3499 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 . 0.4483578 0.14426 3.11 0.0100 

05749G.B02 A4-170 
Entrainment Rate Cfish/hrl/kcfs By Reservoir Flush Rate _{_in daysl 

45 

40-

35-

~ 30-

-;::-

.c: 

.c: 

-f/) 25- s 

Q) 

as 

a: 

- 20- c 

Q) 

E 

c 

~ • Wisconsin River Division 15- -

c 

w 

10-

• t:tolliday's Bridge . 5- . . . .Brule . . . 0 I I I I I 

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhrlkcfs by Flush Rate 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only w/o Prickett 

05749G.B02 A4-l71 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00442 

Root Mean Square Error 4.107978 

Mean of Response 5.038765 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.82420 0.8242 0.0488 

Error 11 185.63035 16.8755 Prob>F 

C Total 12 186.45455 0.8291 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.3086021 1.67001 3.18 0.0088 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -0.264347 1.19615 -0.22 0.8291 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.005591 

Root Mean Square Error 4.30595 

Mean of Response 5.038765 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1.04249 0.5212 0.0281 

Error 10 185.41206 18.5412 Prob>F 

C Total 12" 186.45455 0.9724 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.4806196 2.3617 2.32 0.0427 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -0.746163 4.61419 ·0.16 0.8748 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)A2 . 0.1640659 1.51209 0.11 0.9157 

05749G.B02 A4-l72 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

(/) 

0 

.:I! 12.5 .... 

-;::-

.c 

.... 

.c 

(/) 

!E. 

Gl 10.0 1U 

CI: 

c: 

Gl 

E 

c: 

e 7.5 -

c: 

w .cook 

5.0 

2.5;-----~-------r------r------r------~----~------,-----~ 

05749G.B02 

0.5 1.0 

Fitting 

--Linear At 

1.5 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

2.0 2.5 3.0 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Flush Rate 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-173 

3.5 4.0 4.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.633961 

Root Mean Square Error 3.176118 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 69.88564 69.8856 6.9278 

Error 4 40.35090 10.0877 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.0581 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 15.098956 3.27546 4.61 0.0100 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -2.782764 1.05725 -2.63 0.0581 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.923287 

Root Mean Square Error 1.678949 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1o1.n993 50.8900 18.0533 

Error 3 8.45661 2.8189 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.0212 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.42187 3.01997 7.76 0.0045 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -11.83174 2.74761 -4.31 0.0231 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)l\2 . 1.8150805 0.53961 3.36 0.0436 

05749G.B02 A4-174 
-

Entrainment Rate 

17.5 

15.0 

~ 12.5 

~ (/) 

s 

~ 10.0 

a: 

-

c: 

Cll 

E 

c: 

e 75 c . w 

5.0 

.Loud .cook 

.Aicona 

2.5~-----,------.-----~------.------r------r-----~----~ 

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Frt 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlbrlkcfs by Flush Rate 

Au Sable River Sites w/o Five Channels 

05749G.B02 A4-175 
(Linear Fit ) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.054656 

Root Mean Square Error 1.920693 

Mean of Response 5.369724 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.639865 0.63987 0.1734 

Error 3 11.067190 3.68906 Prob>F 

C Total 4 11.707056 0.7051 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.8036454 3.54855 1.92 0.1510 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -0.437171 1.0497 -0.42 0.7051 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.306995 

Root Mean Square Error 2.014081 

Mean of Response 5.369724 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 3.594008 1.79700 0.4430 

Error 2 8.113047 4.05652 Prob>F 

C Total 4 11,707056 0.6930 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 32.027323 29.7909 1.08 0.3948 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -17.62204 20.1676 -0.87 0.4744 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)112 . 2.7251206 3.19335 0.85 0.4833 

05749H.B02 A4-176 
Entrainment Rate 

.Lower 

12 

11 

~ 0 10 ~ 

-... 

.J:: 

:;: 

(I) 9 .Uppe :e.. 

Cl) 

'iii .Pixley a: 

- 8 c:: 

Cl) 

E 

c:: 

e 

- 7 c:: 

w 

6 

5 • Thornapple .crowley 

4~----r---~-----.----~---,.---~----------~--~ 

05749H.B02 

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 

Reservoir Flush Rate {in days) 

Fitting 

-- Unear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Flush Rate 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-177 

2.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.004778 

Root Mean Square Error 3.645677 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.191425 0.1914 0.0144 

Error 3 39.872884 13.2910 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.9121 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.2944108 2.93379 2.83 0.0663 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -0.267073 2.22541 -0.12 0.9121 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.189229 

Root Mean Square Error 4.030073 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 7.581334 3.7907 0.2334 

Error ~ 32.482974 16.2415 Prob>F 

C Total 4 40.064308 0.8108 

(Parameter Estimates ) ! 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 10.936333 5.08507 2.15 0.1645 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) -6.812948 10.0112 -0.68 0.5664 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)'l\2 . 2.6078602 3.86614 0.67 0.5695 

05749H.B02 A4-178 
Entrainment Rate 

~ ........ 

-.:::' 

..1:: 

........ 

600 

500 

"Zi 400 

-

= 

CD . -

as 

a: 

-i 300 

E 

c: 

·e 

c 

w 200 

100 

0~~~~----~--~----~----~----~--~ 

05749H.B02 

0 5 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

10 15 20 25 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hrlk:cfs by Flush Rate 

Broad River Sites 

A4-179 

30 35 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.987726 

Root Mean Square Error 35.23006. 

Mean of Response ~30.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model ~ 299630.22 299630 24~.4120 

Error 3 3723.47 ~24~ Prob>F 

C Total 4 303353.69 0.0006 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -25.02304 18.6639 -1.34 0.2725 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 18.871203 1.21456 15.54 0.0006 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999964 

Root Mean Square Error 2.352539 

Mean of Response 130.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 303342.62 15~67~ 27405 

Error 2 ~ 1.07 6 Prob>F 

c Total 4 303353.69 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 6.5558026 1.74355 3.76 0.0640 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) . -1.584346 0.79396 -2.00 0.1841 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)"2 0.5798886 0.02239 25.90 0.0015 

05749H.B02 A4-l80 
Entrainment Rate 

Salud 

10 

9 ~ 0 

~ 

'C 

--.c 

.c 

--(/) 8 

:=.. 

CD 

-CIJ 

·0: 

-

c 7 CD 

E 

c ·e 

-

c 

w 6 

5 

.99 Islands 4,_----r----.----~---.,----r----~--~-----.----~--~ 

05749H.B02 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear FJt 

1 2 3 4 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 

- Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Flush Rate 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-181 

5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.853277 

Root Mean Square Error 1.222504 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 17.382871 17.3829 11.6311 

Error 2 2.989031 1.4945 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.0763 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.1002869 0.88541 5.76 0.0288 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 1.2153687 0.35637 3.41 0.0763 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.892548 

Root Mean Square Error 1.479526 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 18.182904 9.09145 4.1532 

Error 1 . 2.188998 2.18900 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.3278 

(Parameter E-stimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 4.453898 1.51376 2.94 0.2086 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 2.4298179 2.05463 1.18 0.4469 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days)112 -0.248919 0.41174 -0.60 0.6538 

05749H.B02 A4-182 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Intake Submergence (in feet) 

-;:::::-

::I 

0 

.c 

-.c 

U) 

;;::: 

-

-1:: 

CD 

E 

1:: 

~ 

-1:: 

w 

1ij 

-

0 

1-

2500 • IY~,.wu~• 

2000-

1500-

1000-

500-

.voughi 

o- I .. .. ·Brule 

-500~--~,----~--~.----~--~.~--~--~,r---~----~,--_, 

0 10 20 30 40 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth 

All Data 

OS749H.B02 A4-183 
(Linear Fit ) 

... (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.001253 

Root Mean Square Error 407.8409 

Mean of Response 86.48974 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 7510.7 7511 0.0452 

Error 36 5988031.1 166334 Prob>F 

C Total 37 5995541.8 0.8329 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 79.661645 73.5509 1.08 0.2860 

Intake Submergence (in feet} 1.7549373 8.2587 0.21 0.8329. 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.001373 

Root Mean Square Error 413.6012 

Mean of Response 86.48974 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 8233.0 4116 0.0241 

Error 35 5987308.9 171066 Prob>F 

C Total 37 5995541.8 0.9762 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 77.907664 79.324 0.98 0.3328 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 3.0689217 21.8881 0.14 0.8893 

Intake Submergence (in feet}l\2 --0.042344 0.65167 -0.06 0.9486 

05749H.B02 A4-184 
'C' 

::J 

0 

..c: 

::c 

(/) 

::.. 

c 

Q) 

-E 

c: 

200 

150 

·e 1oo -c: 

w 

-a 

~ 

50 

05749H.B02 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

• Five Channels 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Frt 

10 20 30 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth 

An Dat.a w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-l85 

• Youghi 

40 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.333335 

Root Mean Square Error 31.3756 

Mean of Response 21.47054 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 17227.646 17227.6 17.5002 

Error 35 34454.984 984.4 Prob>F 

C Total 36 51682.630 0.0002 

. (Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 11.063597 5.72669 1.93 0.0615 

Intake Submergence {in feet) 2.6583149 0.63546 4.18 0.0002 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.711115 

Root Mean Square Error 20.95538 ! 

Mean of Response 21.47054 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 36752.277 18376.1 41.8469 

Error 34. 14930.353 439.1 Prob>F 

C Total 36 51682.630 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 19.936096 4.04963 4.92 0.0000 

Intake Submergence (in feet) .-4.185953 1.11072 -3.77 0.0006 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"2 0.2206723 0.03309 6.67 0.0000 

05749H.B02 A4-186 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Intake Submergence (in feet) 100~--------------------------------------------------------~ 

.centralia 

90 

80 • Wisconsin River Division 

70 

'C' 

::I 

0 

.s::. 

~ 60 UJ 

:::., 

-

c: 

Q) 50 E • Five Channels c: 

·~ 

-

c: 

w 40 

1i:i 

~ 30 

20 

10 

...._ .gg Islands 

;~ • Gaston Shoals 

• Holliday's Bri 

SahJea - -=====: 

0 

0 5 10 15 20 

Intake Submergence On feet) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Intake Depth 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Youghiogheny 

05749H.B02 A4-l87 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.022994 

Root Mean Square Error 20.21702 

Mean of Response 16.1675 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 36 

Analysis of Variance J 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 327.061 327.061 0.8002 

Error 34 13896.747 408.728 Prob>F 

C Total 35 14223.808 o.3n3 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.755928 3.80876 4.66 0.0000 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.545383 0.60968 -0.89 0.3773 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.03051 

Root Mean Square Error 20.44196 

Mean of Response 16.1675 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 433.975 216.987 0.5193 

Error 33. 13789.833 417.874 Prob>F 

C Total 35 14223.808 0.5997 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 18.402857 4.05796 4.53 0.0001 

Intake Submergence (in feet} -1.486723 1.96047 -0.76 0.4536 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"2 ·o.os36744 0.10611 0.51 0.6163 

05749H.B02 A4-188 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Intake Submer:gence lin feet} 

100~--------------------------------------------~ 

90-

80-

- 70- .... 

::s 

0 

.c: 

........ 

.c: 60- 0 

;o::: 

--

c 

Q) so- E 

c 

·as .... 

-c 40-

w 

C\f 

-

0 30- .... 

20-

10-

0 

05749H.B02 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Five Channels 

.... _ . 

: ~------- • Gaston Shoals 

: .Saluda 

; 

I 

I 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

I I I 

5 10 15 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Intake Depth 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-189 

• Holliday's 

-=== .E 

I 

20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.018031 

Root Mean Square Error 20.69399 

Mean of Response 16.11559 . 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 251.628 251.628 0.5876 

Error 32 13703.725 428.241 Prob>F 

C Total 33 13955.353 0.4490 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.508391 3.98708 4.39 0.0001 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.483958 0.63135 -o.n 0.4490 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.021849 

Root Mean Square Error 20.9842 

Mean of Response 16.11559 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 304.915 152.458 0.3462 

Error 31 13650.438 440.337 Prob>F 

C Total 33 13955.353 0.7101 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio PrOb>ltl 

Intercept 17.9651 4.25082 4.23 0.0002 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -1.199443 2.15409 -0.56 0.5816 

Intake Su~mergence (in feet)"2 0.0401799 0.1155 0.35 0.7303 

05749H.B02 A4-190 
90 

80 

70 

-;:::-

::l 

0 

..c: 

:c 60 (/) 

I;: 

--

c: 

Q) 50 

E 

c ·e 

-

w 

c 40 

1U -

0 

1- 30 

20 

10 

0 

05749H.B02 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

0 

Fitting 

-linear Fit 

.Gaston Shoals 

5 10 15 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fisblhr by Intake Depth 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-191 

20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.052757 

Root Mean Square Error 28.84246 

Mean of Response 19.76733 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 602.322 602.322 0.7240 

Error 13 10814.535 831.887 Prob>F 

C Total 14 11416.857 0.4102 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 24.186614 9.07925 2.66 0.0195 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.897012 1.05418 -0.85 0.4102 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

Summary of Fit 

Rsquare 0.081177 

Root Mean Square Error 29.56641 

Mean of Response 19.76733 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 926.789 463.394 0.5301 

Error 12 10490.068 874.172 Prob>F 

C Total 14 11416.857 0.6017 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 27.098765 10.4628 2.59 0.0237 

Intake Submergence (in feet} -3.397787 4.24463 -0.80 0.4390 

Intake Submergence (in feet).-.2 . 0.1268368 0.20819 0.61 0.5537 

05749H.B02 A4-192 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Intake Submeraence (in feet) 

'C' 

::J 

0 

.s:::. 

-.s:::. 

(JJ 

e. 

-

c: 

CD 

E 

c: 

~ 

'E 

w 

~ t50~------------------------------------------------~ 

45-

40-

35-

30-

25-

20-

15-

• Rve Channels 

.cooke 

.Loud 

.Foote 

.Mio 

Al ........ ft .... 

104---~,----~----r---~----~,~0W~--~,----~----~,--~ 

-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 

Rtting I 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

Fishlhr by Intake Depth 

Au Sable River Sites 

05749H.B02 A4-l93 
... 

05749H.B02 A4-194 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Intake Submergence (in feet) 

"i:' 

::J 

0 

=E 

..c:: 

12,------------------------------------------------------, .Lower 

11-

10-

s gc 

CD 

E 

c:: 

-~ 8-

·c: 

w ---------------------~Crowley g 

{:. 

7-

.upper 

6-

.Pixley 

5;------~,-----r-,-----.-,----.,------~,------.,------.-,----~ 

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.51 

Intake Submergence (in teet) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Intake Depth 

Flambeau River Sites 

05749H.B02 A4-l95 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00365 

Root Mean Square Error 3.372437 

Mean of Response 7.85 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.083333 0.0833 0.0073 

Error 2 22.746667 11.3733 Prob>F 

C Total 3 22.830000 0.9396 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.9333333 1.94708 4.07 0.0553 

Intake Submergence {in feet) -0.111111 1.29805 -0.09 0.9396 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00365 

Root Mean Square Error 3.372437 

Mean of Response 7.85 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.083333 0.0833 0.0073 

Error 2 22.746667 11.3733 Prob>F 

C Total 3 22.830000 0.9396 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.9333333 1.94708 4.07 0.0553 

Intake Submergence (in feet} Biased -0.111111 1.29605 -o.09 0.9396 

Intake Submergence (in feet)A2 Zeroed 0 0 . . 

05749H.B02 A4-196 
..:::-

:I 

0 

..c: 

~ (/) 

=.. 

-

c 

CD 

E 

c: ·e 

'E 

w 

Cii 

0 

1-

1500 

1000 

Fitting 

-Linear Frt 

5 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

05749H.B02 

10 15 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

Fishlhr by Intake Depth 

Broad River Sites 

A4-197 

2( 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.59276 

Root Mean Square Error 816.5416 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 2911433.5 2911433 4.3667 

Error 3 2000220.4 666740 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.1278 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 2108.9167 847.845 2.49 0.0887 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -141.8771 67.8949 -2.09 0.1278 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.89639 

Root Mean Square Error 504.4279 

Mean of Response 509.962 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 4402758.8 2201379 8.6516 

Error 2 508895.1 254448 Prob>F 

C Total 4 4911653.9 0.1036 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 3867.0128 895.375 4.32 0.0497 

Intake Submergence On feet) ·-590.5255 190.006 -3.11 0.0898 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"2 21.150195 8.7363 2.42 0.1365 

05749H.B02 A4-198 
Total Entrainment 

.gg Islands 

18 .Gaston Shoals 

"C" 16 

:::1 

0 

.s::; 

-.s::; 

fiJ 

s 

-c: 14 ·~ 

c: .! 

- • Hollida c: 

w 

ta 

-0 12 I10 

.Saluda 

8~------~-----,------~------,-------.-------------~ 

6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Intake Depth 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

05749H.B02 A4-199 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.210604 

Root Mean Square Error 5.238944 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 14.644997 14.6450 0.5336 

Error 2 54.893078 27.4465 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.5411 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>Jtl 

Intercept 21.039215 9.45565 2.23 0.1560 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.497598 0.68121 -0.73 0.5411 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.300577 

Root Mean Square Error 6.97399 

Mean of Response 14.4025 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 20.901532 10.4508 0.2149 

Error 1 48.636543 48.6365 Prob>F 

C Total 3 69.538075 0.8363 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>Jtl 

Intercept 34.453181 39.4613 0.87 0.5431 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -2.740348 6.31851 -0.43 0.7395 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"'2 .0.0856294 0.23875 0.36 0.7808 

05749H.B02 A4-200 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr}/kcfs By Intake Submergence (in feet) 

UJ 

(j 

~ ....... 

-;::-

.s:::. 

....... 

.s:::. 

UJ 

:::.. 

(I) 

a; 

a: 

-c: 

Cl) 

E 

c: ·e 

-c: 

w 

057491.B02 

700~------------------------------------------------. 

• Buzzard's Roost 

600-

500-

400-

300-

200-

.vough• 

100-

~~============~--~~-----~­ ~ 

o- .. .Brule 

-100~--~-.----~---..----~---..----~---..----~--~,--~ 

0 10 20 30 40 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

- Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fisblhr/kcfs by Intake Depth 

All Data 

A4-201 
Linear Fit ] 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.01461 

Root Mean Square Error 102.1779 

Mean of Response 28.18384 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 5572.78 5572.8 0.5338 

Error 36 375851.39 10440.3 Prob>F 

C Total 37 381424.17 0.4698 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 22.30225 18.427 1.21 0.2340 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 1.511669 2.06908 0.73 0.4698 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.01939 

Root Mean Square Error 103.3756 

Mean of Response 28.18384 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 7396.00 3698.0 0.3460 

Error 35 374028.17 10686.5 Prob>F 

C Total 37 381424.17 0.7099 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 25.089036 19.8263 1.27 0.2141 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.576036 5.47071 -0.11 0.9167 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"2 0.0672769 0.16288 0.41 0.6821 

057491.802 A4-202 
Ja 100 ~ -.::-

.r:. 

.._ 

.r:. 

.!!! 

:::.. 

Q) 75 tii 

a: 

-

c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

e 

- 50 c: 

w 

25 

057491.002 

.Prickett 

-Kleber 

.centralia 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

10 20 30 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Intake Depth 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-203 

• Youghi 

40 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.408017 

Root Mean Square Error 17.44578 

Mean of Response 12.10637 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 7342.047 7342.05 24.1233 

Error 35 10652.428 304.36 Prob>F 

C Total 36 17994.475 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 5.3124772 3.18421 1.67 0.1042 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 1.7354098 0.35333 4.91 0.0000 

Polynomial Fit, degree:2 1 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.800862 

Root Mean Square Error 10.26615 

Mean of Response 12.10637 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 14411.083 7205.54 68.3677 

Error 34 3583.392 105.39 PrOb>F 

C Total 36 17994.475 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 10.651166 1.98393 5.37 0.0000 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -2.382869 0.54415 -4.38 0.0001 

Intake Submergence (in feet}"2 0.1327812 0.01621 8.19 0.0000 

05749I.B02 A4-204 
40 

35 

~ 30 

'i:" 

-'= :c 

II) 25 !E. 

Q) 

1a 

a: 

-c 20 

Q) 

E 

c 

·a 

... 

-c 15 w 

10 

5 

05749l.B02 

.Prickett 

.Kleber 

.centralia 

.Tower 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Frt 

.Saluda 

.gg Islands 

5 10 15 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

-Polynomial Frt, clegree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Intake Depth 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Y oughiogheny 

A4-205 

20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare o.o1n 

Root Mean Square Error 9.369235. 

Mean of Response 8.755507 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 53.7806 53.7806 0.6127 

Error 34 2984.6071 87.7826 Prob>F 

C Total 35 3038.3877 0.4392 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.3996258 1.76511 5.33 0.0000 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.221157 0.28255 -0.78 0.4392 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.01926 

Root Mean Square Error 9.50258 

Mean of Response 8.755507 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 58.5197 29.2599 0.3240 

Error 33 2979.8679 90.2990 Prob>F 

C Total 35 3038.3877 0.7255 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratto Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.5358302 1.88637 5.06 0.0000 

Intake Submergence (in feet} -0.419346 0.91134 -0.46 0.6484 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"2 0.0113006 0.04933 0.23 0.8202 

05749I.B02 A4-206 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs By Intake Submergence (in feet) 

45 

40-

35-

~ 30-

..lll:: 

;:. 

J: 

J: 

-(/) 

~ 25-

-Q) 

as 

a: 

- 20- c 

Q) 

E 

c 

·e 15- -

c 

w 

10-

5-

0 

05749I.Bo2 

.Prickett 

.Kleber 

.centralia 

.Tower 

:Five Channels 

. .saluda I 

. 

-I 

I .Holliday's j .Sailor Sbpals =. 0 : I • . 

I . I 0 

0 

I I I 

0 5 10 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Poly,nomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlbr/kcfs by Intake Depth 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-207 

i I I 

15 20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.011365 

Root Mean Square Error 9.498274 

Mean of Response 8.78704 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 33.18n 33.1877 0.3679 

Error 32 2886.9507 90.2172 Prob>F 

C Total 33 2920.1384 0.5484 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.2928635 1.83002 5.08 0.0000 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.175759 0.28978 -0.61 0.5484 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.011524 

Root Mean Square Error 9.649481 

Mean of Response 8.78704 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 33.6517 16.8258 0.1807 

Error 31 2886.4867 93.1125 Prob>F 

C Total 33 2920.1384 0.8356 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.2502483 1.95472 4.73 0.0000 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.108997 0.99055 -0.11 0.9131 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"2 -0.003749 0.05311 -0.07 0.9442 

05749I.B02 A4-208 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs Bv Intake Submeraence (in feet) 

45 

• .Prickett 

40-

35-

~ 30- .:.:: 

-... 

"C' 

-E .centralia .c: 

1/) 

~ 25-

-Cl) 

as 

a: 

E 20- Q) 

E 

c: ·e 15- • Wisconsin River Division 

-

c: 

w 

10- =-

• Rothschild -~o.als .Holliday's B 

5- . . 

. . • White Rapids ~E . . 0 I I I I T 

0 5 10 15 20 

Intake Submergence {in feet) 

Fitting 

- Unear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Intake Depth 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

05749I.B02 A4-209 
(Linear Fit ) 

• (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.019702 

Root Mean Square Error 11.46082 

Mean of Response 8.735842 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 34.3192 34.319 0.2613 

Error 13 1707.5556 131.350 Prob>F 

C Total 14 1741.8748 0.6178 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.790728 3.60772 2.71 0.0177 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -0.214118 0.41889 -0.51 0.6178 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.021328 

Root Mean Square Error 11.91891 

Mean of Response 8.735842 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 37.1506 18.575 0.1308 

Error 12 1704.7242 142.060 Prob>F 

C Total 14 1741.8748 0.8787 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.5186909 4.21782 2.26 0.0435 

Intake Submergence {in feet) 0.0194908 1. 71111 0.01 0.9911 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 112 -0.011848 0.08393 -0.14 0.8901 

05749I.B02 A4-210 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hrl/kcfs Bv Intake Submeraence (in feet) 

J!l 

-;:::-

~ 

€ 

.r:; 

U> 

;;::: 

-Q) 

-m 

cr 

-

c 

Q) 

E 

c ·e 

... 

c 

w 

17.5~----------------------------------------------~ 

15.0-

12.5-

10.0-

7.5-

5.0-

.Five Channels 

• 

.Mio 

.Foote 

.Alcon a 

2.54---~,----~---r-~--~----~T--------~---T~--~----T~--~ 

-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 

Fitting I 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Intake Depth 

Au Sable River Sites 

05749I.B02 A4-211 
OS749I.B02 A4-212 
.:.:. 

~ -.... 

"i:" 

E 

.c 

(/) 

;; 

-Q) 

ca 

a: 

-

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

e 

-c 

w 

057491.B02 

.Lower 

12 

11 

10 

9 .upper 

.Pixley 

8 

7 

6 

5 Crowley 

4~----~-----r----~----~-----,.-----r-----~--~ 

-0.5 0.0 

Fitting 

-- Unear Fit 

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

Fishlhrlk:cfs by Intake Depth 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-213 

3.0 3.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.605643 

Root Mean Square Error 2.383075· 

Mean of Response 8.752123 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 17.443469 17.4435 3.0715 

Error 2 11.358097 5.6790 Prob>F 

C Total 3 28.801566 0.2218 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.9577857 1.37587 7.24 0.0186 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -1.60755 0.91725 -1.75 0.2218 

05749I.B02 A4-214 
Entrainment Rate 

Cll 

1ii 

a: 

600 

500 

c 300 Cll 

E 

r= ·e 

c 

w 200 

100 

057491.002 

• Buzzard's Roost 

5 

Fitting 

-Linear Frt 

10 15 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Intake Depth 

Broad River Sites 

A4-215 

20 
(Linear Fit ) 

...., (summary of Fit ) 

A square 0.586307 

Root Mean Square Error 204.5282 

Mean of Response 130.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

Analysis of Variance 1 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 177858.32 177858 4.2518 

Error 3 125495.36 41832 Prob>F 

C Total 4 303353.69 0.1312 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 525.64054 212.369 2.48 0.0897 

Intake Submergence {in feet) -35.06678 17.0064 -2.06 0.1312 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.891644 

Root Mean Square Error 128.1997 

Mean of Response 130.4379 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 270483.36 135242 8.2288 

Error "2 32870.33 16435 Prob>F 

C Total 4 303353.69 0.1084 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 963.78832 227.558 4.24 0.0515 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -146.8777 48.2897 -3.04 0.0932 

Intake Submergence (in feet)"2 5.2709922 2.22032 2.37 0.1409 

05749I.B02 A4-216 
Entrainment Rate 

1/) 

0 

~ "C" 

&:. 

&:. 

-

1/) 

s 

CD 

iU 

a: 

c 

CD 

E 

c: 

~ 

-

c: 

w 

057491.802 

.Saluda 

10 

9 

8 .Hollida 

7 

• Gaston Shoals 

6 

5 

.gg Islands 4~------.-----~------~------~----~~----~------~ 

6 8 10 12 14 16 

Fitting 

-Unear Fit 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 

- Polynomial Rt, degree=2 

Fisblhrlkcfs by Intake Depth 

Broad River Sites w/o Buzzards Roost 

A4-217 

18 20 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.344983 

Root Mean Square Error 2.583015 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

Analysis of Variance J 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 7.027970 7.02797 1.0534 

Error 2 13.343932 6.67197 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.4126 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 2.6873936 4.66202 0.58 0.6225 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 0.3447062 0.33586 1.03 0.4126 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.627843 

Root Mean Square Error 2.753462 

Mean of Response 7.284912 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 12.790350 6.39517 0.8435 

Error 1 7.581552 7.58155 Prob>F 

C Total 3 20.371902 0.6100 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -10.18595 15.5801 -0.65 0.6314 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 2.4970656 2.49466 1.00 0.4997 

Intake Submergence (in feet)i'2 -0.082178 0.09426 -0.87 0.5435 

05749I.B02 A4-218 
..... 

200 

150 'i::' 

::I 

0 

.e 

.s:: 

UJ 

:;:: 

--c:: 

CD 

E 

c:: 

·~ 100 

'E 

w 

~ 

50 

in inches 

.Yough 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Beaver Falls 

0;----.~~r----r--~r---~--~----.---~--~----,---~ 

05749I.B02 

0 1 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Trash Rack Spacing 

All Data 

A4-219 

9 10 11 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.506738 

Root Mean Square Error 27.04625 

Mean of Response 21.79892 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 26301.947 26301.9 35.9562 

Error 35 25602.486 731.5 Prob>F 

C Total 36 51904.434 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -23.84583 8.81556 -2.70 0.0105 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 17.011035 2.8369 6.00 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.704672 

Root Mean Square Error 21.23318 

Mean of Response 21.79892 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 36575.611 18287.8 40.5632 

Error 34 15328.823 450.8 Prob>F 

C Total 36. 51904.434 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 31.nao41 13.5527 2.34 0.0250 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) -15.64664 7.19468 -2.17 0.0367 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 3.3143641 0.69431 4.n 0.0000 

05749I.B02 A4-220 
200 

150 'C' 

::J 

0 

~ (/) 

:0: 

-

E 

·Q) 

E 

c: ·e 1oo -c: 

w 

.! 

~ 

50 

in inches 

.centralia 

.Wisconsin River Division 

• Five Channels 

. . . 

: . .Shawano 0~--~--~T---~----~--~--~----~--~----~--~--~ 

057491.802 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Trash Rack Spacing {in inches) 

Fitting 

-- Unear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing 

All DB:ta w/o Youghiogheny 

A4-221 

9 10 11 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.024425 

Root Mean Square Error 20.44964 

Mean of Response 16.505 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 355.978 355.978 0.8512 

Error 34 14218.386 418.188 Prob>F 

C Total 35 14574.364 0.3627 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.6923759 9.12798 0.95 0.3477 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 3.1502517 3.41444 0.92 0.3627 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.026245 

Root Mean Square Error 20.7378 

Mean of Response 16.505 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 382.498 191.249 0.4447 

Error 33 14191.866 430.057 Prob>F 

C Total 35. 14574.364 0.6448 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 3.8185207 21.7002 0.18 0.8614 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 6.9158273 15.5541 0.44 0.6595 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)112 . -0.624724 2.51574 -0.25 0.8054 

05749I.B02 A4-222 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Trash Rack Spacina (in inches) 

100~----------------------------------------------~ 

90-

80-

70-

-.... 

::s 

0 

.c 60- ........ 

.c 

t/) 

;;: 

-

c 

CD so- E 

c:: 

! 

-c:: 40- w 

as 

-0 

~ 30-

20-

10-

0 

057491.802 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Five Channels 

.croton 

· ~-:-:=:;:. F§~iQo;tEtet===----::::--~:::::::::::=---- 7.. ~: : .Lower 

• • .Shawc: 

I 

1 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

I -, T 

2 3 4 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-223 
(Linear Fit ) 

--, (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.006971 

Root Mean Square Error 21.50386 

Mean of Response 15.92875 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 97.380 97.380 0.2106 

Error 30 13872.479 462.416 Prob>F 

C Total ~1 13969.859 0.6496 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ftl 

Intercept 11.193333 10.997 1.02 0.3169 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 2.0250347 4.4128 0.46 0.6496 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.032571 

Root Mean Square Error 21.58771 

Mean of Response 15.92875 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 455.013 227.507 0.4882 

Error 29 13514.846 466.029 Prob>F 

C Total 31 13969.859 0.6187 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltf 

Intercept -10.1032 26.6999 -0.38 0.7079 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 19.754849 20.7183 0.95 0.3482 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 -3.246748 3.70626 -0.88 0.3882 

05749I.B02 A4-224 
, 

90 

80 

70 -;::-

:;, 

0 

..c 

1:: 60 

C/) 

!E, 

c: 

Q) 50 E 

c 

£!! 

c 40 

w 

s 

{:. 30 

20 

10 

in inches 

.centr 

• Wisconsin River Division 

• Rothschild 

• White Rapids 

.constantine 

0~--~~--.---~--~r---~--~----~~~----~---r--~ 

05749I.B02 

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fisblhr by Trash Rack Spacing 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-225 

3.5 
Linear Fit J 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.298578 

Root Mean Square Error 25.95686 

Mean of Response 19.48643 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 3441.623 3441.62 5.1081 

Error 12 8085.103 673.76 Prob>F 

C Total 13 11526.726 0.0432 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -32.80472 24.1542 -1.36 0.1994 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 25.200552 11.1501 2.26 0.0432 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.388493 

Root Mean Square Error 25.3138 

Mean of Response 19.48643 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 4478.056 2239.03 3.4942 

Error 11 7048.670 640.79 Prob>F 

C Total 13 ' 11526.726 0.0669 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 68.052775 82.7284 0.82 0.4282 

Trash Rack Spacing Qn inches) -69.85098 75.5256 -0.92 0.3749 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)A2 20.53702 16.1482 1.27 0.2297 

05749J.B02 A4-226 
90 

80 

- 70 ... 

:::::1 

0 

.c. 

....... 

.c. 60 t/) 

c:: 

--c: 

CD 50 E 

c: "! 

--c:: 40 

w 

1ii 

-

0 

1- 30 

20 

10 

0 

05749J.B02 

• Rothschild 

1.0 1.5 

Fitting 

-linear Fit 

• Wisconsin River Division 

2.0 2.5 3.0 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Trash Rack Spacing 

in inches 

3.5 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only w/o Centralia 

A4-227 
(Linear Fit ) 

Summary of Fit 

Rsquare 0.023998 

Root Mean Square Error 21.79397 

Mean of Response 13.66231 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 128.4677 128.468 0.2705 

Error 11 5224.7487 474.977 Prob>F I 

c Total 12 5353.2164 0.6133 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 1.2721411 24.5789 0.05 0.9596 

Trash Rack Spacing On inches) 6.3041943 12.1218 0.52 0.6133 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.106705 

Root Mean Square Error 21.86779 

Mean of Response 13.66231 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 571.2129 285.606 0.5973 

Error 10 4782.0036 478.200 Prob>F 

CTotal 12 5353.2164 0.5688 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -95.69835 103.752 -0.92 0.3781 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 105.27164 103.57 1.02 0.3334 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 -23.72401 24.6556 -0.96 0.3586 

05749J.B02 A4-228 
Total Entrainment fish/hour in inches 

-;:::-

;:, 

0 

.s:::. 

::c 

(j) 

;;:: 

--

c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

1~ 

-c: 

w 

a; 

{?. -

05749J.B02 

• Five Channels 

45 

40 

35 

30 

25 .cooke 

20 

.Loud 

15 

10~------~----~-------r------~------.-------~~~~ 

1.5 

Fitting 

--Linear F=it 

2.0 2.5 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish!hr by Trash Rack Spacing 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-229 

3.0 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.448807 

Root Mean Square Error 11.51078 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 431.54462 431.545 3.2570 

Error 4 529.99187 132.498 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.1454 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 54.167964 18.2237 2.97 0.0410 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) -13.50268 7.48189 -1.80 0.1454 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.492722 

Root Mean Square Error 12.75103 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 473.77005 236.885 1.4570 

Error 3 487.76643 162.589 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.3613 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -85.48924 274.787 -0.31 0.7761 

Trash Rack Spacing Qn inches) 113.51248 249.376 0.46 0.6799 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 -26.84321 52.6736 -0.51 0.6454 

05749J.B02 A4-230 
Total Entrainment in inches 

Lower 

10 

-.:::-

:::J 

0 

.c: 

:c 9 (I) 

;o: 

--

c:: 

CD 

E 

c:: 

£!! 8 -

c:: 

w 

"iii 

0 

~ 

7 

6 

.Pixley 

54-----~----r---~----~----~----~----~----~--~ 

057491.802 

1.5 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

2.0 2.5 3.0 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Trash Rack Spacing 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-231 

3.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.928818 

Root Mean Square Error 0.745258 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 21.741773 21.7418 39.1455 

Error 3 1.666227 0.5554 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.0082 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 0.9981668 1.11876 0.89 0.4380 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 3.0193553 0.48258 6.26 0.0082 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.953831 

Root Mean Square Error 0.735095 

Mean of Response 7.68 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 22.327272 11.1636 20.6595 

Error 2 1.080728 0.5404 Prob>F 

C Total 4 23.408000 0.0462 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.1555076 6.96392 1.17 0.3622 

Trash Rack Spacing On inches) ·3.07114 5.87037 ·0.52 0.6530 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)11.2 1.1761296 1.12989 1.04 0.4072 

057491.802 A4-232 
"C'" 

::J 

0 

.s::: 

....... 

.s::: 

UJ 

:s 

-c:: 

Q) 

E 

c:: ·e 

-

c:: 

w 

10 

0 

~ 

057491.802 

in inches 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5~----~~~~--~----------~--~~--~----------~ 

1.5 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

2.0 2.5 3.0 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fisb/hr by Trash .Rack Spacing 

Flambeau River Sites w/o Lower 

A4-233 

3.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.476406 

Root Mean Square Error 0.757189 . 

Mean of Response 6.65 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 1.0433302 1.04333 1.8198 

Error 2 1.1466698 0.57333 Prob>F 

C Total 3 2.1900000 0.3098 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 3.2048701 2.58178 1.24 0.3403 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 1.8216153 1.35036 1.35 0.3098 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.853881 

Root Mean Square Error 0.565685 

Mean of Response 6.65 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 4 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1.8700000 0.935000 2.9219 

Error 1 0.3200000 0.320000 Prob>F 

CTotal 3 2.1900000 0.3823 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 118.17815 71.5589 1.65 0.3466 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) -113.221 71.5832 -1.58 0.3589 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 28.068127 17.4631 1.61 0.3543 

05749J.B02 A4-234 
Entrainment Rate 

150 

125 

G) Cii 75 

a: 

-c:: 

G) 

E 

c:: 

"ii! 

c 50 

w 

25 

.Prickett 

.Kleber 

• Beaver Falls 

in inches 

.vough 

0~--~~~~~~--~----~--~--~----~--~----~--~ 

057491.B02 

0 1 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fisblhr/kcfs by Trash Rack Spacing 

All Data 

A4-235 

9 10 11 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.518665 

Root Mean Square Error 16.0945 

Mean of Response 13.09167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 9490.162 9490.16 36.6369 

Error 34 8807.123 259.03 Prob>F 

C Total 35 18297.286 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -14.59329 5.30243 -2.75 0.0094 

Trash Rack Spacing On inches) 10.245258 1.69264 6.05 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.783767 

Root Mean Square Error 10.94956 

Mean of Response 13.09167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 36 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 14340.817 7170.41 59.8067 

Error 33 3956.468 119.89 Prob>F 

C Total 35 18297.286 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 23.n1443 7.02801 3.38 0.0019 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches} -12.22815 3.7161 -3.29 0.0024 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 2.2788495 0.35827 6.36 0.0000 

05749J.B02 A4-236 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs By Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

.!!1 

.s:::. 

~ ..... 

.s:::. 

(/) 

!E. 

Q) 

1ii 

a: 

-c 

Q) 

E 

c 

l~ 

-

c 

w 

150~--------------------------------------------------~ 

125-

100-

75-

so25-

• •J 

.Prickett 

.Kleber 

.centralia 

·Station 26 .Beaver Falls 

.Shawano r. . .. =· 0~--~.~~~.~~.~--~.----~,----,~--~,----~,---~,--~,~--~ 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhrlk:cfs by Trash Rack Spacing 

All Data w/o Youghiogheny 

11 

05749J.B02 A4-237 
(Linear Fit ) 

..., (summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.006247 

Root Mean Square Error 10.37309 . 

Mean of Response 9.673216 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 22.3210 22.321 0.2074 

Error 33 3550.8360 107.601 Prob>F 

C Total 34 3573.1570 0.6518 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.6995398 4.67468 1.65 0.1090 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 0.7914606 1.73n3 0.46 0.6518 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.006357 

Root Mean Square Error 10.53334 

Mean of Response 9.673216 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 22.7156 11.358 0.1024 

Error 32 3550.4414 110.951 Prob>F 

C Total 34 3573.1570 0.9030 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.1059089 11.0275 0.64 0.5239 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 1.2507791 7.90101 0.16 0.8752 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)A2 -0.076247 1.27845 -0.06 0.9528 

05749J.B02 A4-238 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs By Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

45.----------------------------------------------. 

40-

35-

~ 30-

"C' 

=E 

..c 

~ 25- -Q) 

ta 

a: 

c: 20-

~ c: 

"i~ c: 15-

w 

10-

5-

.Tower 

• Prickett 

.Kleber 

.Abbeville 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Lower 

-~Shawl •• 

04---~,~~~---T-.--~----~.--~~~.----~--~.--~ 

05749J.B02 

1 2 3 4 5 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Trash Rack Spacing 

w /o Clupeid Sites 

A4-239 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00083 

Root Mean Square Error 10.66414 

Mean of Response 9.575456 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 2.8356 2.836 0.0249 

Error 30 3411.7161 113.724 Prob>F 

C Total 31 3414.5517 0.8756 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.7673925 5.45359 1.61 0.1184 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 0.3455571 2.18838 0.16 0.8756 

Polynomial Fit, degree=2 J 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.0128 

Root Mean Square Error 10.78128 

Mean of Response 9.575456 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratto 

Model 2 43.7068 21.853 0.1880 

Error 29 3370.8449 116.236 Prob>F 

C Total 31 3414.5517 0.8296 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 1.5679543 13.3344 0.12 0.9072 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 6.3392413 10.3471 0.61 0.5449 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 -1.097585 1.85097 -0.59 0.5578 

05749J.B02 A4-240 
Trash RackS in inches 

45 

.Prickett 

40 

35 

~ 30 

-.1!: 

'i::" 

.c: -.c: .centr rn 25 ::.. 

Q) 

Cii 

a: 

c 20 

Q) 

E 

c 

~ 

c 15 

UJ 

10 

5 .crowley 

• • White Rapids .constantine 

0 

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

Fitting 

- Unear Fit 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

05749I.B02 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Trash Rack Spacing 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-241 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.099129 

Root Mean Square Error 11.46485 

Mean of Response 8.672903 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 173.5634 173.563 1.3204 

Error 12 1577.3139 131.443 Prob>F 

C Total 13 1750.8773 0.2729 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -3.070003 10.6686 -0.29 0.7784 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 5.6592321 4.92489 1.15 0.2729 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.101309 

Root Mean Square Error 11.96015 

Mean of Response 8.672903 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 14 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 177.3794 88.690 0.6200 

Error 11 1573.4979 143.045 Prob>F 

C Total 13 1750.8773 0.5557 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 3.0498225 39.0872 0.08 0.9392 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) -0.1083 35.684 -0.00 0.9976 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)"2 1.2461443 7.62963 0.16 0.8732 

057491.802 A4-242 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

Ul 12.5 

~ 

~ UJ 

:::.. '* 10.0 a: 

E 

~ c: 

! 

E 

w 7.5 

5.0 

• Five Channels 

• .cooke 

in inches 

.Aico • 

2.5,_------~-----.-------r------~----~~----~------~ 

05749J.B02 

1.5 2.0 2.5 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr/kcfs by Trash Rack Spacing 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-243 

3.0 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.471167 

Root Mean Square Error 3.817613 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 51.93985 51.9399 3.5638 

Error 4 58.29668 14.5742 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.1321 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 18.206033 6.04399 3.01 0.0395 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) -4.684436 2.48141 -1.89 0.1321 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.485039 

Root Mean Square Error 4.350001 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 6 

(Analysis of V~riance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 53.46902 26.7345 1.4128 

Error 3 56.76752 18.9225 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.3695 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -8.370853 93.7434 -0.09 0.9345 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 19.486655 85.0742 0.23 0.8336 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches}"2 -5.108285 17.9695 -0.28 0.7947 

05749J.B02 A4-244 
-

Entrainment Rate in inches 

Lower 

12 

11 

t 10 

.s::. 

.s::. 

-

Ul 9 II= .Upper -

CD 

ca .Pixley a: 

- 8 c: 

CD 

E 

c: ·e 

- 7 c: 

w 

6 

5 • Thornapple .crowley 

4~----~----~----~--~----~----~----~----~--~ 

05749J.B02 

1.5 

Fitting 

--Unear Fit 

2.0 2.5 3.0 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Trash Rack Spacing 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-245 

3.5 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.45449 

Root Mean Square Error 2.699104 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 18.208816 18.2088 2.4994 

Error 3 21.855493 7.2852 Prob>F 

c Total 4 40.064308 0.2120 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 1.8868035 4.05181 0.47 0.6732 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 2.7631699 1.74778 1.58 0.2120 

Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ] 

(Summary of Fit ) 

As quare 0.729936 

Root Mean Square Error 2.325931 

Mean of Response 8.001698 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 29.244399 14.6222 2.7028 

Error 2 10.819909 5.4100 Prob>F 

C Total 4. 40.064308 0.2701 

Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 32.960033 22.0347 1.50 0.2733 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) -23.67841 18.5746 -1.27 0.3305 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches)l\2 5.1061065 3.57511 1.43 0.2894 

05749J.B02 A4-246 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Average Velocity (in fps) 

200-

..:::- 150-

:::J 

0 

~ (/) 

:=. 

-

c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

e 1oo-

~ 

1ii 

0 

1-

so-

• Youghiogheny 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

~ .99 Islands ... ~. . . :----- . . ------_: -- . . -----------::=: ~g~~~ 

05749J.B02 

. . . . : 04-----~,------~.-----.~----~.------~.------r-,----~----~ 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Fitting 

-Linear F~ 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

-- Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Intake Velocity 

All Data 

A4-247 

7 8 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.021104 

Root Mean Square Error 41.82572 

Mean of Response 24.296 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 30 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 1056.015 1056.01 0.6036 

Error 28 48982.935 1749.39 Prob>F 

C Total 29 50038.950 0.4437 

(Parameter E$timates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 32.408908 12.9363 2.51 0.0183 

Average Velocity (in fps) -3.575018 4.60136 -0.78 0.4437 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.033126 

Root Mean Square Error 42.33086 

Mean of Response 24.296 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 30 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1657.593 828.80 0.4625 

Error 27 48381.356 1791.90 Prob>F 

C Total 29 50038.950 0.6346 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 46.485611 27.598 1.68 0.1036 

Average Velocity (in fps) -14.83213 19.9788 -o.74 0.4643 

Average Velocity (in fps)"2 1.4510841 2.5044 0.58 0.5671 

05749J.B02 A4-248 
Total Entrainment 

100 

90 

80 

70 

-a:-

:::J 

0 

.r. 

1: 60 

(I) 

I;:: 

-... 

c 

Q) 50 E 

c 

1~ 

'E 

w 40 

as 

... 

0 

t- 30 

20 

10 

0 

05749J.B02 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

• Five Channels 

. . . . . 

0 1 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

• Moores Park 

2 3 4 5 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Intake Velocity 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-249 

6 

.Hollid 

Salud 

7 8 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.000156 

Root Mean Square Error 23.4245· 

Mean of Response 17.94615 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 26 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 2.054 2.054 0.0037 

Error 24 13168.974 548.707 Prob>F 

C Total 25 13171.028 0.9517 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.553605 7.89065 2.22 0.0358 

Average Velocity (in fps) 0.1624942 2.65566 0.06 0.9517 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.085718 

Root Mean Square Error 22.88158 

Mean of Response 17.94615 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 26 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1128.997 564.498 1.0782 

Error 23 12042.031 523.567 Prob>F 

C Total 25 13171.028 0.3568 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -3.790357 16.4639 -0.23 0.8200 

Average Velocity (in fps) 16.640451 11.5272 1.44 0.1623 

Average Velocity (in fps)"2 -2.091328 1.42547 -1.47 0.1559 

05749J.B02 A4-250 
Total Entrainment 

'C' 

;::, 

0 

90 

80 

70 

~ 60 (I) 

~ 

E 

CD 50 E 

c 

~ 

E 40 w 

a; 

~ 30 

20 

10 

. .. 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Hollid 

• Escanaba Dam 1 

• Escanaba Dam 3 0~----~~--~----r-----r-----r---~~--~r---~ 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Average Velocity (in fps} 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Intake Velocity 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

OS749K.B02 A4-251 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.00679 

Root Mean Square Error 31.84668' 

Mean of Response 20.89462 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 76.267 76.27 0.0752 

Error 11 11156.323 1014.21 Prob>F 

C Total 12 11232.590 0.7890 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.337944 15.6919 1.10 0.2928 

Average Velocity (in fps) 1.5335563 5.59236 0.27 0.7890 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.16552 

Root Mean Square Error 30.61597 

Mean of Response 20.89462 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2. 1859.216 929.608 0.9918 

Error 10 9373.374 937.337 Prob>F 

C Total 12 11232.590 0.4047 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -21.91053 32.209 -Q.68 0.5118 

Average Velocity (in fps) 30.950624 21.9965 1.41 0.1897 

Average Velocity (in fps)"'2 -3.680306 2.66847 -1.38 0.1979 

05749K.B02 A4-252 
Total Entrainment fish/hour 

• Five Channels 

45 

40 

"C' 

::l 

0 35 

.c 

.c 

-

Cl) 

~ 

... 

c 30 (I) 

E 

c 

1a 

.... 

-c 

w 

25 16 -0 

..... 

20 

.Loud 

15 

Mio 

10~---r---,----~--~---.--~r---T---~---4~~~~ 

05749K.B02 

1.3 1.4 .1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 

Fitting 

-UnearFit 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

--Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Intake Velocity 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-253 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.577082 

Root Mean Square Error 10.08279· 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 554.88583 554.886 5.4581 

Error 4 406.65065 101.663 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.0797 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 75.02104 22.9002 3.28 0.0306 

Average Velocity (in fps) -28.70693 12.2876 -2.34 0.0797 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.681162 

Root Mean Square Error 10.10898 

Mean of Response 22.39167 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 654.96211 327.481 3.2046 

Error 3 306.57437 102.191 Prob>F 

C Total 5 961.53648 0.1800 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 249.46916 177.771 1.40 0.2551 

Average Velocity (in fps) -223.0566 196.779 -1.13 0.3394 

Average Velocity {in fps)i'·2 52.358801 52.9092 0.99 0.3953 

05749K.B02 A4-254 
Total Entrainment (fish/hour) By Average Velocity {in fps) 12,---------------------~ 

'C' 11-

::l 

0 

..c: 

::2: 

f/) 

s 

-

c: 

CD 

E 

c: ·e 

-

c: 

w 

(ij 

10-

9-

8-

7- • Thorn apple 

{:!. - 6-

05749K.B02 

5 I I I I 

1.1 0 1 .15 1.20 1 .25 1.30 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

Fitting 1 

Fish/hr by Intake Velocity 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-255 
05749K.B02 A4-256 
Total Entrainment 

15 

'C' 

::s 

0 

€ 

.r: 

rn 

:;::: 10 --

c 

CD 

E 

c 

e 

c 

w 

-a - 5 {:. 

0 

05749K.B02 

6.0 

Fitting 

-Linear Frt 

• Holliday's Bridge 

6.5 7.0 7.5 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

Fishlhr by Intake Velocity 

Broad River Sites 

A4-257 

8.0 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.8106~5 

Root Mean Square Error 3.174909 

Mean of Response 13.23667 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 3 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 43.148017 43.1480 4.2805 

Error 1 10.080050 10.0800 Prob>F 

C Total 2 53.228067 0.2866 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 51.929286 18.7912 2.76 0.2210 

Average Velocity (in fps) -5.746429 2.7n47 -2.07 0.2866 

05749K.B02 A4-258 
.)/! 

~ ....... 

-;::::;-

:E 

.c 

~ 

-Q) 

ai 

a: 

... 

r::: 

Q) 

E 

r::: 

l~ ... 

r::: 

w 

125 

100 

75 

50 

25 

• Youghiogheny 

.Prickett 

.Kleber 

.centralia 

.saj!Jd .Ho hd; 

0;------r----~------~~--~--------~~--~=-~--~ 

05749K.B02 

0 1 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

2 3 4 5 6 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

-Polynomial Fit, degree=2 • 

Fisb/hr/kcfs by Intake Velocity 

All Data 

A4-259 

A4-259 

7 8 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.039142 

Root Mean Square Error 25.01312 

Mean of Response 13.64326 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 29 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 688.151 688.151 1.0999 

Error 27 16892.711 625.656 Prob>F 

C Total 28 17580.862 0.3036 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 20.296935 7.8629 2.58 0.0156 

Average Velocity (in fps) -2.897247 2.76256 -1.05 0.3036 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.119785 

Root Mean Square Error 24.39651 

Mean of Response 13.64326 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 29 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model "2 2105.929 1052.96 1.7691 

Error 26 15474.932 595.19 Prob>F 

C Total 28 17580.862 0.1904 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 41.966145 15.998 2.62 0.0144 

Average Velocity (in fps) -20.19329 11.5259 -1.75 0.0916 

Average Velocity (in fps)"2 2.2283518 1.4438 1.54 0.1348 

05749K.B02 A4-260 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs By Average Velocity (in fps) 

45~--------------------------------------------------• 

40-

35-

t 30-

~ en 

s 25-

~ a: 

E 20-

Q) 

E 

c 

~ E 15-

w 

10-

5-

• Prickett 

.Kleber 

. . 

.Centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

.Saluda 

~~====~~~BM~=====----===~ • .Moores PariE .Hollida 

.99 Islands 

o~-----~~~---~------.-~----·~------.-~----·~------.-.--~ 

05749K.B02 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 

Fitting 

-linear Fjt 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Intake Velocity 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-261 

8 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary o~ Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.006954 

Root Mean Square Error 10.70634 

Mean of Response 9.479925 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 26 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 19.2647 19.265 0.1681 

Error 24 2751.0151 114.626 Prob>F 

C Total 25 2770.2798 0.6855 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 10.682022 3.60648 2.96 0.0068 

Average Velocity (in fps) -0.497605 1.21379 -0.41 0.6855 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.008543 

Root Mean Square Error 10.92785 

Mean of Response 9.479925 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 26 

[Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 23.6670 11.833 0.0991 

Error 23 2746.6128 119.418 Prob>F 

C Total 25 2770.2798 0.9060 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Sid Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 12.016042 7.86289 1.53 0.1401 

Average Velocity (in fps) -1.527494 5.5052 -0.28 0.7839 

Average Velocity (in fps)l\2 0.1307102 0.68078 0.19 0.8494 

05749K.B02 A4-262 
Entrainment Rate 1fish/hr}lkcfs By_ Average Velocity (in fpsJ 

45~------------------------------------------------, 

40-

35-

J!! 30-

~ ~ ~ 25- -Q) 

as 

a: 

E 20-

~ c "! t: 15-

w 

.Prickett 

.centralia 

• Wisconsin River Division 

10- ~-

• Rothschild ~-Hollida 

05749K.B02 

5- • Escanaba Dam 1 

• White Rapids -Escanaba Dam 3 

o~----~~·----r-----T-----~----~----~----~----~ I I I I I I I 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr/kcfs by Intake Velocity 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

A4-263 

8 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.000037 

Root Mean Square Error 12.41937 

Mean of Response 9.352114 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 0.0623 0.062 0.0004 

Error 11 1696.6490 154.241 Prob>F 

C Total 12 1696.7113 0.9843 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.2504601 6.11944 1.51 0.1588 

Average Velocity (in fps) 0.0438311 2.18088 0.02 0.9843 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.023468 

Root Mean Square Error 12.87203 

Mean of Response 9.352114 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 13 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 39.8192 19.910 0.1202 

Error 10 1656.8921 165.689 Prob>F 

C Total 12 1696.7113 0.8880 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 3.3896207 13.5418 0.25 0.8074 

Average Velocity (in fps) 4.43658 9.2481 0.48 0.6417 

Average Velocity (in fps)"2 -0.549567 1.12192 -0.49 0.6348 

05749K.B02 A4-264 
Entrainment Rate 

15.0 

12.5 

~ 10.0 

a: 

E 

CD 

E 

c: ·e 

c 

w 

7.5 

5.0 

• Five Channels 

.Loud 

.Mio 

.Foote 

2.5~---r--~---.r---~--~---r---.---.----.---,---~ 

05749K.B02 

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1. 7 1.8 1 .9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

Fitting 

-Linear Frt 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhrlk:cfs by Intake Velocity 

Au Sable River Sites 

A4-265 
(Linear Fit ) 

Summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.571821 

Root Mean Square Error 3.435147 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 63.03559 63.0356 5.3419 

Error 4 47.20094 11.8002 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.0819 

Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 24.920591 7.80196 3.19 0.0331 

Average Velocity (in fps) ·9.675599 4.1863 -2.31 0.0819 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.813444 

Root Mean Square Error 2.618227 

Mean of Response 7.181992 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 6 

Analysis of Variance J 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 89.67120 44.8356 6.5405 

Error 3 20.56533 6.8551 Prob>F 

C Total 5 110.23654 0.0806 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 114.91842 46.0427 2.50 0.0880 

Average Velocity (in fps) -109.9406 50.9657 -2.16 0.1199 

Average Velocity (in fps)l\2 27.011919 13.7035 1.97 0.1433 

05749K.B02 A4-266 
Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs By Average Velocity (in fps) 

~ ~ 

-._ 

.:::: 

..... 

.:::: 

(/) 

:0:: -

CD 

CiS 

a: 

.... 

c: 

CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 

c 

w 

OS749K.B02 

13~--------------------~ 

12-

11-

10-

gB7-

6-

5- . • Thornapple 

4 I I I I 

1 . 1 0 1 . 15 1.20 1 .25 1 .30 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

Fitting 1 

Fish/hrlkcfs by Intake Velocity 

Flambeau River Sites 

A4-267 
05749K.B02 A4-268 
Entrainment Rate 

rn 

-() 

~ -.::::-

.c 

....... 

.c 

rn 

; 

-

a> 

a; 

a: 

... 

c::: 

Cl> 

E 

c::: 

1~ ... 

c::: 

w 

05749K.B02 

10 

8 • Holliday's Bridge· 

6 

4 

2 

0 

-24---~----~--~----~--~----~--~----~--~--~ 

6.0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

6.5 7.0 7.5 

Average Velocity (in fps) 

-- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhrlk:cfs by Intake Velocity 

Broad River Sites 

A4-269 

8.0 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.850473 

Root Mean Square Error 1.723353 

Mean of Response 7.490994 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 3 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratto 

Model 1 16.892319 16.8923 5.6878 

Error 1 2.969946 2.9699 Prob>F 

C Total 2 19.862265 0.2528 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -16.71887 10.2 -1.64 0.3487 

Average Velocity (in fps) 3.5955244 1.50762 2.38 0.2528 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.850473 

Root Mean Square Error 1.723353 

Mean of Response 7.490994 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 3 

Analysis of Variance J 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 16.892319 16.8923 5.6878 

Error 1 2.969946 2.9699 Prob>F 

C Total 2 19.862265 0.2528 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept Biased -16.71887 ~0.2 -1.64 0.3487 

Average Velocity (in fps) Biased 3.5955244 ~.50762 2.38 0.2528 

Average Velocity (in fps)"2 Zeroed 0 0 • • 

05749K.B02 A4-270 
Total Entrainment 

~ 

:::J 

0 

..c: 

:c 

Cl) 

o;::: 

--

c:: 

CD 

E 

c:: 

-~ 

-

c:: 

w 

as 

{:!. -

2000 

1500 

1000 

500 

0 

0 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

50000 100000 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

05749K.B02 

Fish/hr by Usable Storage 

All Data 

A4-271 

150000 
... 

(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.998185 

Root Mean Square Error 26.4581"1 

Mean of Response 159.3347 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 17 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 5n3805.9 5n3806 8247.924 

Error 15 10500.5 700 Prob>F 

C Total 16 5784306.4 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>Jtl 

Intercept -6.177851 6.67081 -Q.93 0.3691. 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0143409 0.00016 90.82 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.999699 

Root Mean Square Error 11.15607 

Mean of Response 159.3347 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 17 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 5782564.0 2891282 23231.02 

Error 14 1742.4 124 Prob>F 

C Total 16 5784306.4 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>Jtl 

Intercept 16.876799 3.93253 4.29 0.0007 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) -0.002686 0.00203 -1.32 0.2071 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft)"'2 9.7e-B 0 8.39 0.0000 

05749K.B02 A4-272 
Total Entrainment fish/hour 

-

~ 

::J 

0 

.c: 

-.c: 

fl) 

c;:::: 

-

-

c: 

CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 

'E 

w 

ttS 

-0 

1-

so~----------------------------------------------~ • Five Channels 

40 

30 

.croton 

20 

.Foote 

• .Prickett 

10 

.Hardy 

04-----~------~----~------~----~------~----~ 

-1000 0 

Fitting 

-linear Fit 

1000 2000 3000 4000 

Usable Storage (in ac·ft) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Usable Storage 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 

5000 6000 

05749K.B02 A4-273 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.081286 

Root Mean Square Error 11.17969 

Mean of Response 13.53063 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 154.8180 154.818 1.2387 

Error 14 1749.7971 124.986 Prob>F 

C Total 15 1904.6151 0.2845 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 16.585619 3.91742 4.23 0.0008 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) -0.002202 0.00198 -1.11 0.2845 . 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.094825 

Root Mean Square Error 11.51591 

Mean of Response 13.53063 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 16 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 180.6054 90.303 0.6809 

Error 13 1724.0097 132.616 Prob>F 

C Total 15 1904.6151 0.5233 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 18.403602 5.76888 3.19 0.0071 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) -0.00528 0.00727 -0.73 0.4807 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft)l\2 0.0000006 0 0.44 0.6665 

05749K.B02 A4-274 
Total Entrainment fish/hour B 

40 

'C" 

:J 

0 

s::. 

..c:. 

- 30 f/) 

:0::: 

--

c 

CD .croton 

E 

c ·e 

w 

'E 20 

"iii .Foote 

-0 

..... 

.Prickett 

10 

.Hardy 

o~------~----~------~------~----~------~----~ 

05749K.B02 

-1000 0 

Fitting 

--Linear Fit 

1000 2000 3000 4000 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by Usable Storage 

w/o Clupeid Sites 

A4-275 

5000 6000 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.087959 

Root Mean Square Error 11.34883 

Mean of Response 14.066 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 161.4775 161.477 1.2537 

Error 13 1674.3473 128.796 Prob>F 

C Total 14 1835.8248 0.2831 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 17.213114 4.06032 4.24 0.0010 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft} -0.00225 0.00201 -1.12 0.2831 

(Polynomial Fit, degree:2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.094175 

Root Mean Square Error 11.77191 

Mean of Response 14.066 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) - 15 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 172.8891 86.445 0.6238 

Error 12 1662.9356 138.578 Prob>F 

C Total 14 1835.8248 0.5524 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 18.397613 5.89713 3.12 0.0089 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) -0.004338 0.00757 -0.57 0.5772 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft)11.2 0.0000004 0 0.29 0.7790 

05749L.B02 A4-276 
Total Entrainment 

'C' 

:::J 

0 

~ 

16 

14 

II) 12 s 

c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

"! 10 -c:: 

w 

"iii 

0 

t- 8 

6 

• White Rapids 

• ~olliday's Bridge 

·Rogers 

.Brule 

Prickett 

4~----r----.----~---,----~----.---~----~----r---_, 

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 

Fitting 

-- Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Frt, degree=2 

Fishlhr by Usable Storage 

w/o Clupeids, Full-flow data only 

05749L.B02 A4-277 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.078622 

Root Mean Square Error 5.485196 . 

Mean of Response 10.744 

Observations (or Sum Wgts} 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 7.702199 7.7022 0.2560 

Error 3 90.262121 30.0874 Prob>F 

C Total 4 97.964320 0.6477 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 9.798514 3.08375 3.18 0.0502 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft} 0.0007611 0.0015 0.51 0.6477 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2 ) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.079172 

Root Mean Square Error 6.715963 

Mean of Response 10.744 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 5 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 7.755992 3.8780 0.0860 

Error 2 90.208328 45.1042 Prob>F 

C Total 4 97.964320 0.9208 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 10.438253 18.9055 0.55 0.6363 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft} -0.000889 0.04782 -0.02 0.9869 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft)"2 0.0000003 0 0.03 0.9756 

05749L.B02 A4-278 
H19 ANN ENT RATE FISH/HR ~y AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

a: 

:I: 

..... 

:I: 

en 

ii 

w 

~ a: 

...... 

z 

w 

z 

z 

< 

m 

?"" 

:I: 

2500 -

2ooo15oo1ooo5oo-

• 

= I 

o- -A, ••••• A ~ 

-500~~,--~,~,~~,--T-.-.~~.--~,--~,~ 

0 1000 3000 5000 7000 9000 

· AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fish/hr by River Flow 

All Data 

05749L.B02 A4-279 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.001313 

Root Mean Square Error 387.6012 

Mean of Response 79.18905 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 7900.5 7901 0.0526 

Error 40 6009387.9 150235 Prob>F 

C Total 41 6017288.4 0.8198 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 93.98642 87.9815 1.07 0.2918 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS -0.007758 0.03383 -0.23 0.8198 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.003158 

Root Mean Square Error 392.1762 

Mean of Response 79.18905 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 19002.7 9501 0.0618 

Error 39 5998285.7 153802 Prob>F 

C Total 41 6017288.4 0.9402 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 70.049137 125.946 0.56 0.5813 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0159459 0.09463 0.17 0.8671 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS"2 -0.000003 0.00001 -0.27 0.7896 

05749L.B02 A4-280 
H19 ANN ENT RATE FISH/HR By AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

a: 

::r: 

J: 

200-

(/) 150- u: 

w 

i !z 1 oow 

z 

~ 

• 

CJ) 

i so- • 

• 

• 

;:::::;"" .. ' ~~·==~~~~--- .. . ·-~':e. • • •• • 

05749L.B02 

0 I I I I I I I I I 

0 1000 3000 5000 7000 9000 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

A4-281 

Fish/hr by River Flow 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.008924. 

Root Mean Square Error 36.57852 

Mean of Response 20.33512 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 469.865 469.87 0.3512 

Error 39 52181.535 1337.99 Prob>F 

C Total 40 52651.401 0.5569 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 16.699117 8.38335 1.99 0.0534 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0018939 0.0032 0.59 0.5569 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.031895 

Root Mean Square Error 36.62473 

Mean of Response 20.33512 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Analysis of. Variance) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 1679.301 839.65 0.6260 

Error 38 50972.100 1341.37 Prob>F 

C Total 40 52651.401 0.5402 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 8.8270302 11.7978 0.75 0.4589 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0097168 0.00884 1.10 0.2785 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS"2 -0.000001 0 -0.95 0.3483 

05749L.B02 A4-282 
H19 ANN ENT RATE FISH/HR B AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

100 

90 

a: 80 

:I: 

..... 

:I: 70 en 

u:: 

w 60 

~ a: 50 

1-

z 

w 40 

z 

z 30 < 

01 

- 20 :t: 

1 0 

0 

05749L.B02 

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree-2 

5000 

Fish/hr by River Flow 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost and Dam #4 

A4-283 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.424392 

Root Mean Square Error 15.62161 

Mean of Response 15.32229 

Observations {or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 5937.532 5937.53 24.3307 

Error 33 8053.145 244.03 Prob>F 

C Total 34 1399o.6n 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -1.743694 4.35233 -0.40 0.8913 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0108512 0.0022 4.93 0.0000 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.62871 

Root Mean Square Error 12.74093 

Mean of Response 15.32229 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 8796.075 4398.04 27.0930 

Error 32 5194.603 162.33 Prob>F 

c Total 34 1399o.sn 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 18.071188 5.9074 3.06 0.0045 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS -0.016517 0.00678 -2.44 0.0203 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFSA2 0.0000059 0 4.20 0.0002 

05749L.B02 A4-284 
H19 ANN ENT RATE FISH/HR B AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

100,-------------------------~ 

a: 

:I: 

:I: 

f/) 

u:: 

w 

!;( 

a: 

~ 

z 

w 

z 

z 

< 

01 

i 

05749L.B02 

90 

80 

70 

60 

50 

40 

30 

20 

10 

o~--~~~--~~~~--~--~ 

0 1 000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

A4-285 

Fish/hr by River Flow 

All Data w/o Clupeid Sites 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.230978 

Root Mean Square Error 17.92201 

Mean of Response 14.91389 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 3280.078 3280.08 10.2120 

Error 34 10920.752 321.20 Prob>F 

C Total 35 14200.830 0.0030 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 3.3416197 4.69424 0.71 0.4814 

A5 AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.006808 0.00213 3.20 0.0030 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.233766 

Root Mean Square Error 18.15852 

Mean of Response 14.91389 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 3319.675 1659.84 5.0339 

Error 33 10881.155 329.73 Prob>F 

C Total 35 14200.830 0.0124 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 1.3780799 7.39775 0.19 0.8534 

A5 AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0092528 0.00738 1.25 0.2186 

A5 AVG RIVER FLOW CFSI\2 -4.5e-7 0 -0.35 0.7311 

05749L.B02 A4-286 
H19 ANN ENT RATE FISH/HR B AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

50 

a: 

:I: 

:I: 

Ul 

ii 

~ a: 

1-

z 

w 

z 

~ 01 

i: 

05749L.B02 

40 

30 

20 

10 

.. 

0 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

Fitting 

- Linear Fit -

- Polynomial Fit, degree=2 

Fishlhr by River Flow 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost, Dam #4, 

Wisconsin River Division and Centralia 

A4-287 
(Linear Fit ) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.052119 

Root Mean Square Error 9.103859 

Mean of Response 10.92364 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 141.2728 141.273 1.7045 

Error 31 2569.2876 82.880 Prob>F 

C Total 32 2710.5604 0.2013 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.9093423 2.80035 2.82 0.0082 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0021772 0.00167 1.31 0.2013 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.096932 

Root Mean Square Error 9.032939 

Mean of Response 10.92364 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 262.7407 131.370 1.6100 

Error 30 2447.8196 81.594 Prob>F 

C Total 32 2710.5604 0.2167 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 2.8070631 5.02072 0.56 0.5802 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0102128 0.00679 1.50 0.1430 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFSI\2 -0.000002 0 -1.22 0.2319 

05749L.B02 A4-288 
H19 ANN ENT RATE FJSH/HR B AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

a: 

~ UJ 

u: 

~ a: 

~ w 

z 

~ Ol 

i 

25 

20 

15 

10 

5 

.. o~~~-r--~~--~~~~~ 

05749L.B02 

0 500 1 000 2000 3000 4000 

AS AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 

Fitting 

-Linear Fit 

- Polynomial Fit, degree-2 

Fishlhr by River Flow 

All Data w/o Buzzards Roost, Dam #4, 

Wisconsin River Division, CentraJia and Five Channels 

A4-289 
(Linear Fit) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.126458· 

Root Mean Square Error 6.00055 

Mean of Response 9:742187 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 1 156.3750 156.375 4.3430 

Error 30 1080.1979 36.007 Prob>F 

C Total 31 1236.5729 0.0458 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl · 

Intercept 6.5642659 1.85759 3.53 0.0014 

A5 AVG RIVER FLOW CFS 0.0022909 0.0011 2.08 0.0458 

(Polynomial Fit, degree=2) 

(summary of Fit) 

Rsquare 0.146147 

Root Mean Square Error 6.03396 

Mean of Response 9.742187 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 32 

(Analysis of Variance) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 2 180.7216 90.3608 2.4818 

Error 29 1055.8514 36.4087 Prob>F 

C Total 31 1236.5729 0.1012 

(Parameter Estimates) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 4.2781638 3.36225 1.27 0.2133 

ASAVG RIVER FLOWCFS 0.0059327 0.00459 1.29 0.2062 

A5 AVG RIVER FLOW CFS"2 -9.7e-7 0 -0.82 0.4202 

05749L.B02 A4-290 
APPENDIXS 

DETAILED STATISTICAL RESULTS OF 

SUPPLEMENTAL STATISTICAL ANALYSES 

... 

A ...... 

Adtu\l~tl - -- - T'""' Enlr.lift ........ Ennial· 

ltiWCJ Raonoir TObl Us.blc Fluh - """"'"'* ...... , Submer· A ...... Rack 

- ftlCOI 

Flow Size s....,. St ... JQic Lcn&lll Widlh Flow ·- --· Vdocily Sfi"Cinl Flow lti11C 

Ave.RM<Fiowfc(J) 1.0000 -&.fim -0.6939 -0.!1824 -0.7ll2 -11.7342 ~ 0.~2 -0.3162 0.~953 o.68l!~ 0.91117 0.!1245 --41.1(;77 

R......,its;.cfin..,...) -0.6772 1.0000 0.9941 0.8848 0.9461 0.05SO 0.8162 -0.3941 0.1,78 0.163, 0,0669 -0.4435 0.:!511 11.114:1(, 

TOIII-.,fil"'c:.fl) . .0.6939 0.9941 1.0000 0.8301 0.9126 0.1145 0.7491 -0.3798 U.:!Co41 0.1114 0.0397 -0.42,3 O.liiOS U.7'121 

U-Slllr.llefin »ftl -O..Slt!4 0.884K 6.8301 1.0000 0.9737 -0.1200 0.9901 -41.4891 -0.3069 0.2734 0.0762 -O.S4SO 0.3434 11.\l'}(.l 

11-...irFiusiiRoretindoys) .o.7l12 0.9461 6.9126 0.9737 1.0000 0.0739 0.9319 -0.!1806 -0.0990 0.1055 -0.0631 -0.6'!111 O,IK57 0.¥51!4 

11-...irl..eaJlhtinmilu) -0.7342 o.osso 0.1145 -0.1200 0.0739 1.0000 -0.2109 -0.7207 0_1770 ·0.9723 -41.9374 .IJ.Iill:!2 -11.94110 -11.1279 

-..;,W'odlhffCCI) .0.4945 0.8162 0.7491 0.9903 0.9339 ·0.2109 1.0000 -41.4507 -0.4349 0.3407 0.1265 -4l.SC17'1 11 .• 023 0.9<)62 

--filler.) 0.11942 -0.3941 .0.3798 -41.4891 -0.51106 -0.7207 .{),4S07 1.0000 0.0199 0.6747 0.1!2114 0.!/'nY 0.6322 ~n.snr • 

...... s......,-. .. ,mrcct) .0.3162 0.15711 0.2641 -0.3069 -O.OWO O.S771l -0.4349 0.0199 1.0000 .0.-IMJ .{).2617 0.04SS -0.4316 -IU7l~l 

A-Vcb:ily(in fP') O.S953 0.16!5 0.1114 0.2734 0.10'5 -41.97:!3 0.3407 0.6747 -0.4643 1.0000 0.!1654 0.6271 0.99~9 O.:?(t~'J 

T-Rack Spxiolalin inches) D.611118 0.11669 0.0397 0.07~2 .0.0631 .0.9374 0.126, 0.11284 -0.2617 0.9654 1.0000 0.7902 0.955~ u.ri~47 

&..-Flow (in cl•) 0.9017 .0.4435 -41.4253 .O.s.ISO .0.630) .0.6822 .0..5019 0.9979 O.D4SS 0.6.."71 0.7902 1.00110 0.5812 ·0.:1(177 

..........._ ~tw.: trooMwur> 0.5245 0.2.511 O.lOOS 0.3434 0.1857 .0.94111'1 O.ol073 0.6322 .0.4316 0.99S9 0.9SS9 0.5812 1.0000 ""-Ad.,_..,_..._ -4!.!16n 0.11436 0.7821 0.9964 0-9.514 -0.12?9 0.9962 -&.!1126 -0.31f11J 0.2M9 D.USI7 .O.S6n 1.111111 ltao:(fiJiootorl/Jicfs 

Note: Ent~l flow is the hydraulic capacity of the units represented by the eatrainment estimate. This differs 

from the plant hydraulic capacity for several sites w~ eatraimncut estimates were not extrapolated to the 

entire plant flow. 

05748.802 AS-1 
, ... , ... .. :.:.,,:,.:, ••. ,,.,.;: •• ,.-,,,,,,.,.·· ... · ..... ,:-:-,;:.:-.··· •. w •• ~·.:-.: .• :.: .. ;,,;·;;;;;;, •••.• :;·:.:.;·,·~=.:;;,:;;,. 

· ·:- .. ~:= : ·: .. ;;: .. :.-..::~ ~;.-:.: :.~·=:: ·: :.. . .. - · ····· · · · · · · · =···=: :··. ~!i(i:·n ·; ::;~·l:i.> :::r···:~ ;.=-:·.-:: · ···.· ... ·-:::.·.· .. ·:;:·:: ' 

r;;••:.•.:.:/Iil:;l·=-~~=r•t~·· 

....... ·. 

~--

·• 

EigeftVIIuo: 1.4857 5.01:18 1.4«15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .0.0000 .0- .0.0000 -o.oooo .0.0000 ·0.0000 Percent: ... .- 3U210 11.0110 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .0.0000 .0.0000 .0.0000 .0.0000 .0.0000 .0.0000 

c ... P-: 41.1900 11.1110 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 Eige.wectcws: 

Avo.Rr..rflow(eto) 0.31165 0.01707 .0.09781 0.13359 0.04854 0.51&11 0.14045 0.17141 .0.44534 0.36101 0.33099 .0.01851 ·D.Ms:M Aenrvair Size (in acn&) .0.26111 0.21212 0.21184 0.01514 O.W-103 0.176110 .0.32203 0.32813 .0.16651 0.11748 .0.40711 .0.07121 0.011111 

r .. o~Siatooel"'oc-ftl .0.26331 0.21801 0.36U7 0.03373 .0.41241 .0.2•711 .0.03731 .0.03102 .0.1295$ 0.11227 0.05754 .0.00929 -D.25!535 

Uulllo 51-(In oc-ft) .0.24770 0.34034 .0.09911 .0.00391 .O.M31S O.IICXII 0.7431~ 0..00713 o.23»• .0.01370 -o.o53.2• .0.017., ·0.05479 

-Flvo11Ro1o(ln""r'l -o.am 0.21904 0.02626 0.03110 .0.0&515 0.1&667 ·0.31736 0.153<1 0.1157:1 .0.37378 0.67400 -o 05931 -o.OI712 

-l.a .... (itl-) .0.27238 -D.31176 0.13350 0.~1 0.1 .. 15 ..0.05442 0.10825 0.10228 0.- O.ln37 0.32996 0.11725 0.58025 

--WodiiiP•l o0.211H 0.35311 .0.111454 0.02353 0.-12 0.021N 0.19&19 -o.73490 .().115219 0.1~7 0.13112 ..Q.OHI1 •0.01333 

PIM!Fiow(lflda) 0.36513 O.D7t10 0.21310 ..0.13220 0.06144 0.21309 .0.10071 .0.11510 0.74519 0.22404 .0.01393 -o. 12293 ·0.18548 lntaloo SUIIm_. (i<llott) .0.07757 ·0.11113 0.'73605 .0.1417& ·0.05119 0.21310 0.21100 .0.25998 -().~19 .0.33914 0.03223 O.o70ff 0.05533 ,.,_ Vobcily (on lp&) 0.22289 U6541 -D.OCQII -o.~ ..0.20782 ·0.05550 .0.- .0.01131 .O.DIM3 0.01015 0.01111 .0.20<016 O.I&~.AS 

Trull Aocl< 6t1o<int (In-~ G.2701S 0.30962 0.11126 0.77510 .0.1521~ ·0.07 .. 7 0.02300 ..0.07311 O.Oo4712 .0.21726 .0,13051 .O.IM77 0.25116 

..... --( .. do) .... 71 0.05037 0.2t3l2 .0- 0.42104 .0- 0.11111 0.1M09 .0.00751 .0.113767 0.3420:1 ..0.11155 •0,18800 

TOIII&*-(lis_, 0.11621 0.31415 .__ 0.- .0.00000 0.- -41.- 0.- o.- 0.- -o.- o.tl01511 0.-

7.0171 4.5131 1.48'3 0.0000 0.0000 O.OIIOD 0.0000 0.0000 .0.0000 ... 0000 -o.oooo .0.0000 

53.1114 34.7111Z 11.3024 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .0.0000 .0.0000 -o.oooo -o.oooo 

53.1114 11.8976 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 

-().33709 0~ -41.10477 0.18073 0.06011 o.t7586 0.10272 -41.03761 0.13052 .0.04110 -o.ont7 0.17 .. 0 

0.32521 0.15<17 ·-- 0.10191 .0.10807 -o.42852 0.46510 ·0.30123 0.15175 .0.33775 -41.23710 ·0.22763 

0.31151 0.12551 0.31204 -G.NUO .0.01197 0.27005 -().10571 0.07518 0.10000 .0.34521 .0.21601 0.07 .. 0 

0.33407 0.21150 .0.00001 .0.05896 ·0.18001 .0.11'61 0.17033 0.75575 0.14779 ... -07 0.34811 0.11471 

0.35936 0.13915 0.01017 .0.00059 .0.15415 -41.01334 -D.21221 .0.4V7D2 0.17146 0.3555< 0&762• 0.1~ 

0.13441 -o.43546 0.10810 0.23317 0.06173 -41.0471& -o.-92 ..0.00231 0.00067 .0.2:!180 0.01957 0.571&7 

0.31421 0.2456t .0.15310 0.13971 -41.11371 0.37031 0.350tl .0.05357 .0.~1221 0.31412 .0.3979< 0 .• 2110 

-o.30040 0.24364 OJ!St37 -().11591 0.0<8901 0.21640 02!1128 ..0.14665 -o.21513 .0.45144 UOII70 0.21287 

-o.004N .0.23802 0.71116 .0.11424 0.15174 0.2521' 0.25075 0.18&'3 0.131« 0.44789 O.CNDU .0.12014 

·0.07451 U6111 0.02731 -().57751 -41.07719 0.05701 -().07031 -o.Ml!tl 0.05717 0.04156 .0.07571 ·0.02111 

·0.13102 ··- 0.11231 0.71452 -41.02372 0.07139 -o.113D1 0.11056 .0.110111 0.01751 0.12.3911 -().24051 

.0.31350 0.21754 0.25154 -o.ozns 0.01950 -o.l14n .0.11051 0.075<1 .0.11718 0.25121 -D-22Mf 0.4521<7 

0.33111 0.21351 .0.12925 0.- OJIO!IK -o.- 0.- ~ ~ -o.- -o.- ··-

Note: Entrainment flow is the hydraulic capacity of the units represented by the entrainment estimate. This differs 

from the plant hydraulic capacity for several sites where entrainment estimates were not extrapolated to tbe 

entire plant flow. 

05748.B02 AS-2 
~ 

~ 

~ 

> Ul 

I 

UJ 

: Ave. River F~ . . . . . . : 

·'-·· ... 

- . ' ·!to- . . ...... . 1--. . ·~· ~· ,... ... ....... .~· 4, • . 

110000 

crs 110000 

30COO 

0 

10000 

~CIC$ lllOO 

2000 

300000 

ac -f1 200000 

100000 

0 

.. A .. ot~~olrSi . . . , ' . , . 

150000 

8C·fl100000 

50000 

Sl 

day• 3) 

10 

2l 

15 

miles 10 

5 

l1 

. 

-' 

.. 

. 

... 

. 

. 

~ . 

li 

. 

.: . ll 

10000 

7llOO feet .eooo 

1000 

15000 

:15000 

cr. 15000 

5000 

C) 

feel 2l 

1· 

_k_ 

~ ·: . fps 

!~ : 1- f 

. 

:~ , :~ l' 

inches 

': 15000 

:15000 

cfs 15000 

5000 1-_i.. 

liOO 

Cli•Mrrl/L<f• ~ 

. 200 

1- ~ 

.. .-

-·. . 

. 

~· . 

:tp . 

. 

·If 

. 

lb· 

'l. 

. . 

. 

. 

~~. 

. 

. it. 

. 

llrt. 

. . .... '!!. 40000 boG 2000 8tXIO 

tfs acn:s 

. . . . . .ii._ ~· . ·;£ . . _I ~ aa.· l-f4 ~:& :U. _j_ •• _,_ . • ; T alai Slor•ll" . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . • f- . -" I-- . ... ~ ....... -· . IM-· • ' Usablo Sloro . . . . 

.. . 1-- -· • t--- • :-• t--=- -· . -· ~- .. . R. .. IVOir~ . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . L • t ~ ·~a . ~ r:::~ I~ ~ ~ l . . . Roaarvolrlo . . . . . . 

• ' b· liW . . ~ ~ ~· : 

. . ~ I· ~ . Re&ai'VOitWi • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I l ~- 1~. i. -~· ~~~ . !f-e. r-A. . l . Planl Flow(~ . . . . 

~ ir • . ' ·~ . liiL . b.. . ~. ~· _44~· ...,· Ji . 

.t .· . 

. ~- . ~ka~!Q. . . ~· . ~ . . l u {l . ~. . . . . i ... ~~;. . . . .. .. . . . . .. . :A\Oiflll" Vok . . . . . . . . . . j. . t:> . ~; ~ .,. . • l:b. ~ -~· ri . . . . . . Trasll Rack! • . . ~ . ·b· . f_· 'Fib' , I 

" . ' :J?,, . f• . ~- . t ' . . . . . . Enlrainmonl 

• L . . ' •lit',• . Lair... . . • ~"n • . ~· 

. ~ . 

. . • • .. 1-" • .a:.. -~··· -~· I 

~· -' lllOOO 2:50000 50000 150000 10 , so 5 10 15 20000 «lee 110!1000 2SOoO 10 , ac·fl ac-ft d:tys miles feel cr~ fed 

Scatter Plot Matrix of Correlation for Flow-Adjusted 

Entrainment Rate 

I'--- Flow -

L~ . "" ' - L . 

. . 

..... . p. . II -·· _II I 

1 3 5 7 D 1 3 5 7 D ISlOII 2SOoO 

Ips iochc< cf• 

Ll\ • . Enrrainmenl 

IIIII II 

0 200 500 

tr~>hlhrl/1..-fs 
-..) 

~ 

"" i 

~ 

J:. 

toOOO 3l Avo. RIWf F', 

ds amo_ 

xmo: 0"' ...... .,~- ... IOXQ • •' Ro.....,.So 

acres (OXJ 

1--- ·1-- ·I- . . j.o· ""'-·I-- .. 1.-... J...• I. 

, , 

:moi: xmoo _L .. ·. I~ 

•••To&a1Sbr"'91' 

~,..: . .. ...: -~· .~ ~~~~ii. li I 

oc-rt cooooo .. .u. .. 

' I • I'• 

~sxw- ...... .... 

).... 

.. IOIXDO~I & 0 t. .1' 

IC·h=- -;.-t ·1 -l~-J·- : I~ ~).... soooo 

.. ... .. -· r.· ,. Sl • • • • • • 

Cl 

days 3D • • • • 

:: ~ I' I 15 

miles. •: 

1

, 

I!D.lO • 1 

-lr I it 117 . ~~- ~. 

lOOO 

Planl FloW 

.tD.IrJ

j;l - 4 .-IQ,l~ 

I eel 

rrs • • • 

Inches 

3!alO 

25IXIO 

t· l . "- . • . ~ J'. r. 1 Jlls> .~: • • .? . . . . . 

. ie . t . ' b; . ~! • ~ • • • ;b ~~· . 

L,. •• " ·- . " ds I=~ 

~ ~= 

~-H~~ · ... _, TolaiEnv.W :mo 

fish/huur 11100 

o::l .. ..:..•. .. I I • I I I I I ...... . ··--- 'I:;;; ' +•' ~~ •Ia-• ' • 1-• ., .. • 

1111111111( I I I I I I 111111r '1'1'1''1'1'1'1..,-/ '1'1'1'~1111111 illillii'i'l'l'l

7 1illlliilliillilill IICIOOO 80000 2000 alO 

'ds aaa fi)OOO ~ SIODO 150000 10 31 !II 5 10 15 31000 1000 110SICII 251X10 10 30 I 3 5 1 I I 3 5 7 I 1 t,OO) 2!DOO 

IC•fl IC·fl days miles feet tfs feet fps incfiCS ds 

Scatter Plot Matrix of Correlation for Average Entrainment 

Rate 

O!Q) 1500 

lisiVhoor 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

A square 

Root Mean Square Error 

Mean of Response 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 

(Lack of Fit ) 

0.208632 

363.5665 

79.96571 

42 

Source DF 

Lack of F"rt 35 

Pure Error 1 

Sum of Squares 

4758487.0 

14.6 

4758501.6 

Mean Square 

135957 

15 

F Ratio 

9324.881 

Prob>F 

0.0082 Total Error 36 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term 

Intercept 

Assembla[B·R] 

Assembla(C..R] 

Assembla(N·R] 

Assembla(O.R) 

Ave. River Flow (cfs) 

(Effect Test ) 

Source 

Assemblage Code 

Ava. River Flow (cfs) 

05748.B02 

Estimate 

205.6413 

·29.9493 

404.25887 

·124.3948 

·147.2458 

-D.045896 

Nparm OF 

4 4 

1 1 

Std Error t Ratio 

98.7448 2.08 

127.933 -o.23 

135.622 2.98 

104.13 ·1.19 

106.959 ·1.38 

0.03619 ·1.27 

Sum of Squares 

1246250.7 

212531.3 

A5-5 

Prob>ltl 

0.0445 

0.8162 

0.0051 

0.2401 

o.1n1 

0.2129 

F Ratio 

2.3571 

1.6079 

Prob>F 

0.0719 

0.2129 
·500 -r---r----r---,--r---..,.---t 

·500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 1254505.5 

Error 36 4758501.6 

C Total 41 6013007.1 

05748.B02 AS-6 

Mean Square 

250901 

132181 

F Ratio 

1.8982 

Prob>F 

0.1189 
Assemblage Code ) 

3000~-----------------. 

2500-

"C' 5 2000-

-€ 

.s:::. 

en 

==- 1500-

-c: 

CD 

E 

c:: 1000- ·e 

'E 

w 

(ij 

~ 

-500 

-100 

I 

0 

I I I I 

100 200 300 400 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

• 

I 

500 600 

Sum o~ Squares F Ratio DF Prob>F 

1246250.7 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 88.1521447 

c 522.3603106 

N -6.2933326 

0 -29.1443653 

R 15.4324660 

05748.B02 A5-7 

2.3571 4 

Std Error 

144.0330824 

155.1186394 

1 05.71 02026 

1 05.5219876 

181.8309797 

0.0719 

Mean 

33.427 

465.205 

9.726 

10.290 

20.715 
Ave. River Flow (cfs) J 

'C' 

:::J 

0 

2500~--------------------------~ 

• 2000-

-E 1500-

.s:::. 

II) 

:::., 

-; 1000-

E 

c: 

·~ 

'E 

w 

(ij 

0 

t500- ........ .... .... i-----__ ................ ________________________________ _ 

~------~ ---~,-~·---------------------- 0.- --- =----~--.::::----~ .... ...... . '~, .... .... . . . ............. . .... -500 --t-----,.,----r-,----,..--,----.,......a.,.,.---r-1-----l 

-2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 

Ave. River Flow (cfs) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

212531.33 1.6079 1 0.2129 

05748.B02 A5-8 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.858641 

Root Mean Square Error 155.8785 

Mean of Response 85.12439 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error 

Intercept -n.46497 33.782 

Assembla[B-R] 20.132484 54.7121 

Assembla[C-R] 81.724996 76.1202 

Assembla[N-R) 3.8209661 46.2622 

Assembla[O-R] -79.87809 42.836 

Reservoir Size (In acres) 0.1868581 0.01542 

(Effect Test ) 

t Ratio 

-2.29 

0.37 

1.07 

0.08 

-1.86 

12.12 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 104600.0 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 1 1 3566903.9 

05748.B02 A5-9 

Prob>ltl 

0.0280 

0.7151 

0.2903 

0.9346 

0.0706 

0.0000 

F Ratio Prob>F 

1.0762 0.3831 

146.7976 0.0000 
Whole-Model Test 

-... 

:::1 

0 

2000 

€ 1500 ..r:: 

~ 

'E 

Gl 1000 

E 

c "! 

'E 

w 

"jij 

~ 

500 

-500 --f------r--r---..,.---r----.----1 

·500 0 500 1 000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance J 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 5165694.2 

Error 35 850433.5 

C Total 40 6016127.7 

05748.B02 AS-10 

Mean Square 

1033139 

24298 

F Ratio 

42.5193 

Prob>F 

0.0000 
Assemblage Code J 

2500-,----------------, 

2000-

-::- 5 1500-

.e 

.L:. 

en 

!E. 1000-

-c:: 

Q) 

E 

c:: 

"i! 

'E 

w 

i\i 

0 

.... 

5oo- • _______ .. 

------------- ---- ...... ____________ , ____ .. ~· .. . ____ .,___________ - --------------~-

0 ___ .,.--- ----------:------~---------------------~ . . -5oo-. 

·1 000 -t---r---,---r,---r--..,..., --r---,r-----r--1 

0 50 100 150 200 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

104600.01 1.0762 4 0.3831 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 122.5206737 

c 184.1131849 

N 1 06.2091554 

0 22.51 00949 

R 76.5878377 

05748.B02 AS-11 

Std Error 

59.37364190 

88.2331 0515 

45.697 43722 

41.66027645 

78.07554686 

Mean 

33.427 

685.217 

9.726 

22.548 

20.715 
..., Reservoir Size (in acres) 

-... 

::l 

0 

-€ 

.r:. 

.!!! 

--

-c: 

CD 

E 

c 

-~ 

-c 

w 

'iS 

-0 

..... 

2500~---------------------------,~ J 

2000 

1500 

1000 

500 

0 

-500 

-1000 

-5000 0 

., , 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, , 

, , 

, , , ,' , , ,' ,' , , , , 

J ,' 

~" ,' , ,' , , , , , , , ,' , " , " , , , , , , , , ,' ,' , ,' , , , , , , , , ,' ,,' ,•:,-· 

... ----.-----------------------

5000 10000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

3566903.9 146.7976 1 0.0000 

05748.802 AS-12 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.692734 

Root Mean Square Error 240.0315 

Mean of Response 84.41079 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept -35.60232 51.9917 ..0.68 

Assembla(B-R] 18.756248 90.3587 0.21 

Assembla{C-R) 57.446344 125.466 0.46 

Assembla{N-R] 9.8981935 74.6566 0.13 

Assembla[Q-R] -72.17177 68.4501 -1.05 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0061907 0.00093 6.64 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 73438.3 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 1 1 2541835.0 

05748.B02 AS-13 

Prob>ltl 

0.4984 

0.8369 

0.6501 

0.8954 

0.2996 

0.0000 

F Ratio Prob>F 

0.3187 0.8634 

44.1175 0.0000 
• 

Whole-Model Test 

2000 

-;:-

:I 

0 

..e: 1500 .1: 

~ 

c 

Cll 1000 

E 

c "! 

c 

w 500 

iii 

~ 0 

·500 -f-...,._-.,.--.----,---.,.--.----1 

·500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares 

4156600.2 

1843683.5 

6000283.7 

Mean Square . F Ratio 

Model 

Error 

CTotal 

05748.B02 

5 

32 

37 

AS-14 

831320 14.4289 

57sts Prob>F 

0.0000 
Assemblage Code J 2500~----------------, 

-.... 

2000-

5 1500-

.e: 

J::. 

Cl) 

::::.. 1000-

c 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·as 5oo- .... 

c 

• 

------ --- w 

(ij 

0 

1-

~-----~-----------------.---------;----- -------~---------- ... ~- ---------~---

0 • ----------~-----~----------------- __ ... ---- -----

-5oo-

• 

• 

-1 000 -+--...,.---r,--r---r-,---r---.,....-,--1 

0 50 100 150 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

73438.254 0.3187 4 0.8634 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 117.4498299 

c 156.1399261 

N 1 08.5917751 

0 26.5218092 

A 84.7645677 

05748.802 A5-15 

Std Error 

99.0159574 

144.0441631 

73.8750951 

66.6175925 

120.4025102 

Mean 

23.132 

685.217 

10.120 

10.290 

20.715 
Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

2500~--------------------------~ 

2000 

-.... 

;:, 1500 0 

~ .r::. 

(I) 

;: 

- 1000 -c: 

CD 

E 

c: 500 ·a 

.... 

-c: 

w 

(ij 0 

~ 

-500 

-1000 

-100000 0 50000 150000 250000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum ·Of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

2541835.0 44.1175 1 0.0000 

05748.802 A5-16 
• 

Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.99842 

Root Mean Square Error 27.63588 

Mean of Response 152.1233 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 18 

(Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error 

Intercept -4.085363 9.15961 

Assembla[B-R] -4.434451 23.213 

Assembla[C-R] -4.986985 23.2009 

Assembla[N-R] -3.038437 12.553 

Assembla(O-R] -4.792191 12.5636 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0143585 0.00023 

(Effect Test ) 

t Ratio 

-o.4S 

-0.19 

-0.21 

-0.24 

-0.38 

63.55 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 1127.9 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 1 1 3084037.1 

05748.B02 AS-17 

Prob>ltl 

0.6635 

0.8517 

0.8334 

0.8128 

0.7095 

0.0000 

F Ratio Prob>F 

0.3692 0.8261 

4038.063 0.0000 
Whole-Model Test 

'C' 

::3 

0 

2000 

..e 

.s= 1500 

~ 

c 

CD 

~ 1000 -~ 

c 

w 

iii 500 

-~ 

0 

-500 0 500 1 000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance J 

Source 

Model 

Error 

C Total 

05748.B02 

OF 

5 

12 

17 

Sum of Squares 

5790865.1 

9164.9 

5800030.0 

AS-18 

Mean Square 

1158173 

764 

F Ratio 

1516.446 

Prob>F 

0.0000 
Assemblage Code ) 

2500~---------------. 

-... 

::;, 

0 

-E 

.r::. 

2000-

Jg 1500- --; - E 

c:: ·e 1oooc: 

w 

CiS 

0 

1- soo-

- ••• &~ ·- ---------------------------------~ --- • _1f ____ --------------------------------~~ 

0 I I I I ~.- I I I I 

145 150 155 160 165 170 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio DF Prob>F 

1127.8574 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 148.2242151 

c 147.6716813 

N 149.6202296 

0 147.8664752 

R 169.9107313 

05748.B02 A5-19 

0.3692 4 

Std Error 

27.71213947 

26.11822759 

11.48217514 

11.48857670 

16.11583220 

0.8261 

Mean 

17.67 

1248.85 

14.07 

10.15 

25.85 
Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 

2000 

- 1500 ... 

::) 

0 

€ 

.r:. 

Cl) 1000 

:;: 

--

c 

CD 500 

E 

c 

·a; 

0 ,._ 

-c 

w 

"iii 

0 ·500 

t-

-1000 

-1500 

·100000 0 50000 1 00000 150000 20000 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of ·Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

3084037.1 4038.063 1 0.0000 

05748.B02 AS-20 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.400804 

Root Mean Square Error 345.8058 

Mean of Response 88.8 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Lac:k of F'rt 29 3587289.9 123700 770.4110 

Pure Error 1 160.6 161 Prob>F 

Total Error 30 3587450.5 0.0285 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 127.90114 88.6656 1.44 0.1595 

Assembla[B-R] -113.7394 138.08 .0.82 0.4166 

Assembla[C-R) 540.31387 221.161 2.44 0.0207 

Assembla[N-R) -137.075 113.552 -1.21 0.2368 

Assembla{O-R) -166.643 102.729 -1.62 0.1152 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 8.9549628 7.26411 1.23 0.2272 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 813781.98 1.7013 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 1 1 181730.52 1.5197 

05748.B02 A5-21 

Prob>F 

0.1758 

0.2272 
Whole-Model Test 

-.... 

:l 

0 

2000 

-oE 1500 J:. 

Ill 

s 

c 

Ql 

E 

c: 

"f! 

c 

w 

iii 

~ 

1000 

500 ---------------------- __ ...... ---.-

-500 -l'-----r----.,..---,--r---.----1 

-500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 2399655.9 

Error 30 3587 450.5 

C Total 35 5987106.3 

05748.B02 A5-22 

Mean Square 

479931 

119582 

F Ratio 

4.0134 

Prob>F 

0.0066 
Assemblage Code J 

2500--r-----------------, 

2000- a 

, .. ' , ,,' 

,' ,' 

,.,"' 500-

--·---- _.,.,,' ----------- . 

, , , , , 

, 

~~~~' 

,' 

,,~" , 

o- ----------------- --------------------------· . .,.,-----·------------- . ,,' --------- . ,' 

-5oo- • ,,, ,,'' 

,' 

·1000 ,' 1 

-400 -200 

" ,,'' 

I 

0 

I 

200 

• 

I 

400 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

I 

600 800 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

813781.98 1.7013 4 0.1758 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 61.2897581 

c 715.3429915 

N 37.9541 048 

0 8.3861137 

A 52.1726156 

05748.B02 AS-23 

Std Error 

144.5281244 

255.4493243 

1 06.6810763 

95.9217187 

200.7896595 

Mean 

23.132 

911.790 

10.120 

10.290 

25.850 
Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) J 

2500--r----------------, 

2000-

~ • 5 1500-

-€ 

.r:. 

CIJ 

s 1000-

• 

• 

-1000 I I I I I I I 

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of. Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

181730.52 1.5197 1 0.2272 

05748.B02 AS-24 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment {fish/hour) 

(Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.264456 

Root Mean Square Error 19.16913 

Mean of Response 16.84229 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 35 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source ·oF Sum of Squares Mean Square 

Lack of Fit 28 10655.688 380.560 

Pure Error 1 0.520 0.520 

Total Error 29 10656.209 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 23.108747 5.644 4.09 

Assembla(B-R) 18.052935 7.69615 2.35 

Assembla(C-R] 2.0652478 9.43867 0.22 

Assembla(N-R] ·10.29088 5.89733 ·1.75 

Assembla(O-R) -9.527403 5.93259 ·1.61 

Reservoir Length (in miles) .0.569754 1.09122 -0.52 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 3161.7445 

Reservoir length (in miles) 1 1 100.1738 

05748.802 AS-25 

F Ratio 

731.5654 

Prob>F 

0.0292 

Prob>ltl 

0.0003 

0.0260 

0.8283 

0.0916 

0.1191 

0.6055 

F Ratio Prob>F 

2.1511 0.0998 

0.2726 0.6055 
Whole-Model Test 

100 

90 

80 

'§" 

0 70 .e 

.c 

:S 60 

'E 

Gl 50 E 

c 

! 40 

-

c 

w 30 iii 

0 

1- 20 

10 ---------------------

0~~~~-r~~~-r--~~~--; 

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares 

Model 5 3831.306 

Error 29 10656.209 

C Total 34 14487.515 

05748.B02 AS-26 

Mean Square 

766.261 

367.455 

F Ratio 

2.0853 

Prob>F 

0.0960 
Assemblage Code J 100~------------------------~ 

90-

80-

70-

60-

so40;.. 

30- • 

• 

.. ,,' , .. ' .... !#I. 

, .. ' , .. , .. ' .... 

, , , , 

• 

..- .. ·--.. ---- 20- ·------- • -·-----·----- --~----------------------------- ... ~ --------------------------------- 10- • _ .... - • . .:. ,,' . ,"' 

o- ;,./ 

, .. .. 

• • 

• • 

-10 .... I I I I I I I 

5 1 0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of _Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

3161.7445 2.1511 4 0.0998 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 38.67429798 

c 22.68661 050 

N 1 0.33048307 

0 11.09395956 

A 20.32146252 

05748.B02 A5-27 

Std Error 

8.71664492 

11.20973453 

5.78580802 

5.643968n 

9.61415442 

Mean 

39.4980 

23.6167 

10.1918 

10.5142 

20.7150 
Reservoir Length (in miles) j 

-.... 

:::l 

0 

..e: 

.s::. 

(/) 

;;:: 

-

-

c: 

CD 

E 

c: ·e 

-c: 

w 

(ij 

~ 

100~--------------------------~ 

so-

• 

60- • 

• 40- ------ '~ -~# ,,__ _.~---

-- • I • -- ·---.. . .----· . ·--..... -------·" 

20 -------- • ... ____ --.:--------------------------

- . . ' . ';, 

_ .. --~--·----- ·--~-, . -......... -, o- . . .... .......... -, 

-------........... 

. 

• 

• ----... ......... -20- • 

40~----~~~----~~--~~--~~~--~~ 

0 5 10 15 20 

Reservoir Length (in miles) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

1 00.17382 0.2726 1 0.6055 

05748.B02 AS-28 
...., 

Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 

Root Mean Square Error 

Mean of Response 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 

0.528578 

17.92101 

17.0568 

25 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 

Assembla{B-R) 

Assembla[C-R] 

Assembla[N-R) 

Assembla{O-R] 

Reservoir Width (teet) 

18.053026 

38.604422 

4.5796608 

-10.30589 

-15.08579 

0.0019421 

5.88485 3.07 

9.47837 4.07 

9.67871 0.47 

6.78797 -1.52 

7.18644 -2.10 

0.00186 1.04 

Prob>ltl 

0.0063 

0.0006 

0.6415 

0.1454 

0.0494 

0.3102 

[Effect Test ) 

Source 

Assemblage Code 

Reservoir Width (teet) 

Nparm 

4 

1 

D F Sum of Squares F Ratio Prob>F 

4 6841.2266 5.3254 0.0048 

1 349.1on 1.o81o 0.3102 

05748.B02 A5-29 
Whole-Model Test 

100 , 

" . 90 / 

. I 

. 80 , 

, 

. • - . :; . 

, 

, 0 70 . 

, € 

.s::. 

.!ll 60 -=-

c 

c» 50 E 

c: 

I~ 40 

-c: 

w 30 __ ... -·- (ij ..... -------- 0 --- ___ ....... ~ 20 ---

10 

0~~~~-r--~~~--~~~~ 

0 1 0 20 30 40 so 60 70 80 90 , 00 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 6841.903 

Error 19 6102.088 

C Total 24 12943.992 

05748.002 A5-30 

Mean Square 

1368.38 

321.16 

F Ratio 

4.2607 

Prob>F 

0.0091 
Assemblage Code J 

-... 

::l 

0 

~ .c 

Cl) 

s 

-

c:::: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

"(ij 

.. 

-

c: 

w 

a; 

~ -

100~----------------------~.~ 

90-

so70-

60-

so40-

30-

20-

10-

o-

-10 

0 

, 

, • , 

, 

, , , , 

, , 

, 

, , , 

•' , 

, 

, • 

" 

, 

, 

, , 

, , 

, 

, 

, 

, , 

, , 

., , 

, 

, 

, , . 

. ,"' , ,'• _________ .. -------- ~~ -·· __ ,~ ------- --

--.-~.----- ------~~~-------------------------- __ , . . .,,. ,'' .. ,' . " . , , 

, 

, , , ~·· . • 

I I I I I I 

1 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of. Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

684·1.2266 5.3254 4 0.0048 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 6~~1~~7 

c 26.30707 408 

N 11.42151894 

0 6.64162046 

A 3.93501796 

05748.B02 AS-31 

Std Error 

10.44959898 

10.66363293 

6.04673321 

6.344Sn45 

17.96946811 

Mean 

58.8067 

23.6167 

10.4444 

8.8711 

5.3100 
Reservoir Width (feet) J 

'i::" 

::l 

0 

.e: 

.t:: 

(/J 

s 

-

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

·~ 

-c 

w 

"iii 

0 

t100~--------------------------~ 

75-

so- • ~, 

..... 

~,,~~ .. ,,~ 

~' 

~ ~ 

~~ 

.. ' 

25- ------------.. -~----~ ~ 

----~-----~-- ~~- .. ~------------------------------ ~ .. ~-~------------! __ ~, ----- 0- , ...... -~ .. ' ------------ ....... . 

-25-

• -50~---~.-------~,---~,~----~,----~,-----~ 

-2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 

Reservoir Width (feet) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

349.1 0770 1.0870 1 0.31 02 

05748.802 A5-32 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.212639 

Root Mean Square Error 362.8143 

Mean of Response 83.92048 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 163.90314 116.803 1.40 

Assembla[B·R] ·90.5268 123·.952 ..().73 

Assembla[C·R] 446.09906 150296 2.97 

Assembla[N-R] ·128.6054 106248 ·121 

Assembla[Q-R] ·119.3609 104.862 ·1.14 

· Plant Aow (in cfs) ..(),012595 0.03485 ..().36 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 1178494.1 

Plant Aow (in cfs) 1 1 17189.8 

05748.802 AS-33 

Prob>ltl 

0.1691 

0.4699 

0.0053 

0.2340 

0.2625 

0.7199 

F Ratio Prob>F 

2.2382 0.0842 

0.1306 0.7199 
Whole-Model Test 

2500 ""T"""----...-----1------~ 

-.:::-

:::::1 

0 

.s::. 

..t:. 

--.!!:! 

::.. 

E 

(I) 

E 

c: 

·a 

.... 

-

c: 

w 

a; 

0 

.... 

2000 

1500 

1000 

500 

0 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

• 

I 

I 

I 

I 

,' 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

, 

, 

, 

I 

: 

I 

I 

-500 -f'----i.~----,r--..,.----y----,-----1 

-500 0 500 1 000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source 

Model 

Error 

C Total 

05748.B02 

DF 

5 

36 

41 

Sum of Squares 

1279791.9 

4738831.7 

6018623.6 

A5-34 

Mean Square 

255958 

131634 

F Ratio 

1.9445 

Prob>F 

0.1110 
Assemblage Code J 

-a:::-

:::3 

0 

2500--,-------------.---. 

2000-

~ 1500-

..c:: 

rD 

s 

- ,, ....... '" 

.... ,,"" c: 

CD 1000-

E .. ' , .. ' ..... .. c: 

-~ 

- 500- .. c: 

w 

"ii , . 

~ --···--·-·--

.. . ,' 

.. ' ,, 

-500 , I I I I I t I I 

-200 -1 00 0 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

1178494.1 2.2382 4 0.0842 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 42.1539958 

c 578.n98555 

N 4.0754210 

0 13.3198849 

R 25.07 48278 

05748.B02 AS-35 

Std Error 

139.2410897 

175.0024445 

1 05.8962031 

100.2723156 

181.8078970 

Mean 

33.427 

555.086 

9.726 

22.548 

20.715 
Plant Flow (in cfs) l 

"C' 

:::l 

0 

2500~--------------------------~ 

2000- I 

-E 1500-

..r::. 

Cl) 

s 

... 

c: 

CD 1000-

E 

c: 

-~ 

-c: 

w 

(ij 

0 

1-

o- • ---~~-~:: .---- -,-, 

. .- ---- ----.. ------------ ·500 --4----~ ·-----=-· -------..----IL-.. _ .. ;::.a--..-1 I I I I 1 

• 

-2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

17189.828 0.1306 1 0.7199 

05748.B02 AS-36 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

Summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 

Root Mean Square Error 

Mean of Response 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 

(Lack of Fit J 

0.29696 

357.5702 

84.50769 

39 

Source D F Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Lack of Fit ·11 4210981.8 

Pure Error 22 8280.7 

Total Error 33 4219262.4 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate 

Intercept 192.14164 

Assambla[B-R] -126.7586 

Assembla(C-R) 606.97153 

Assembla(N·R] -145.7414 

Assembla(Q.R) -163.0449 

Intake Submergence (in feet) -9.111653 

Std Error 

73.1882 

123.091 

165.453 

102.678 

104.275 

7.88518 

382817 1017.06 

376 Prob>F 

0.0000 

t Ratio Prob>ltl 

2.63 0.0130 

·1.03 0.3106 

3.67 0.0009 

·1.42 0.1652 

·1.56 0.1275 

·1.16 0.2562 

(Effect Test ) 

Source 

Assemblage Code 

Nparm 

4 

1 

D F Sum of Squares F Ratio 

3.4681 

1.3353 

4 1773673.1 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 1 170723.7 

05748.B02 AS-37 

Prob>F 

0.0180 

0.2562 
Whole-Model Test 

-:::-

::1 

0 

2000 

..e: 1500 .s::. 

Ill 

~ 

c: e 1ooo c: ·e 

c: 

w 

Iii 

0 

1-

500 

0 

·500 -f'-------r-----..----...----.--.......,...---1 

·500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares 

Model 5 1782196.0 

Error · 33 4219262.4 

C Total 38 6001458.5 

05748.B02 AS-38 

Mean Square 

356439 

127856 

F ·Ratio 

2.7878 

Prob>F 

0.0330 
Assemblage Code J 

3000~--------------------------~ 

2500-

-::-- 5 2000-

€ 

.r::. 

Cl) 

;;:: 

-

c: 

CD 

E 

1500-

c 1000- ·e 

-c: 

w 

n; 500- .. .... .. .... , .. 

,' 

,,'' 

,' 

,,'' 

, .. ,,'" 

• 

.... .. .. .. ...... .. , 

.... ' 

-~~~~~ r:::· -·:::••·•-·••=:::::::::::::::: o- •• ~ .. ....... • • ~ 

............... 

, , ... -500 -+----;.l::...-----,,------,,------.,------r,------r,------1 

-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1 000 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

1773673.1 3.4681 4 0.0180 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 30.8405014 

c 764.5706548 

N 11.8577266 

0 -5.4457336 

A -13.8275112 

05748.B02 A5-39 

Std Error 

135.1673634 . 

191.5200491 

103.2381078 

104.0962140 

181.2669191 

Mean 

33.427 

685.217 

9.726 

10.114 

20.715 
Intake Submergence (in feet) ) 

2~0~--------------------------~ 

2000-

• 

-.:::- 5 1500-

-E 

.s:; 

(/) 

;: 

-'E 

Cl) 

E 

c:: 

"iij 

... 

-c:: 

w 

n; 

;§ 

1000-

500-,_ ~ 

--...... ----, _______________________________ .-~-

---

--------~ --.----~----.----~--------------- 0- _________ ;::_._"!!' 

-sao- • • 

................. -------------- - ----------

• 

------- -1000 -+-~-~l....,,r---""TI--..,...'-Ir---~--rl-,----t 

-10 0 10 20 30 40 

Intake Submergence (in feet) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

170723.69 1.3353 1 0.2562 

05748.B02 AS-40 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.234366 

Root Mean Square Error 37.36135 

Mean of Response 22.42559 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 34 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square 

Lack of Fit 26 38981.958 1499.31 

Pure Error 2 102.424 51.21 

Total Error 28 39084.382 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 30.48438 11.3189 2.69 

Assembla(B-R] 7.808018 13.8019 O.fi7 

Assembla(C.R] 36.869578 16.375 2.25 

Assembla(N-R] -19.07203 12.0414 -1.58 

Assembla(Q-R] -17.51608 11.5216 -1.52 

Average Velocity (in fps) -0.938488 4.33315 -o.22 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 11152.771 

Average Velocity (in fps) 1 1 65.478 

05748A.B02 AS-41 

F Ratio 

29.2764 

Prob>F 

0.0335 

Prob>ltl 

0.0118 

0.5761 

0.0324 

0.1245 

0.1397 

0.8301 

F Ratio Prob>F 

1.9975 0.1223 

0.0469 0.8301 
Whole-Model Test 

I 

I 

• I 

I 

200 I 

I 

I 

I 

,' ' 

-.::- ' ' ::I ,' 

0 ,' 

€ 150 I 

I 

.r. I 

~ I 

I 

- I 

- I 

I c: I 

CD , 

E 

c: 100 

"iii • ... 

-

c: 

w 

iii 

0 50 1--

0 50 100 150 200 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source 

Model 

Error 

CTotal 

05748A.B02 

OF 

5 

28 

33 

Sum of Squares 

11963.981 

39084.382 

51048.364 

A5-42 

Mean Square 

2392.80 

1395.87 

F Ratio 

1.7142 

Prob>F 

0.1641 
{Assemblage Code J 

-,._ 

~ 

0 

-€ 

.c. 

.!!2 

--

c: 

Q) 

E 

c 

-~ 

'E 

w 

iii 

15 

..... 

200-

-

150-

-

100-

-

, .. ,.-"'"" 

so- • 

• 

. ,,,"' 

......... --·' , .. 

.... 

• 

.... ,,,"' 

, .. ... -

--------------: - ------·JL·--- -------------~-------------~---

o0 

. · ... --------·-------------------·--- ., .. ._ ........ -. .. . ,.,'' 

_ .. _ .. 

I 

10 

I I 

20 30 

Assemblage Code 

I I I 

40 50 60 70 

Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio DF Prob>F 

111s2.n1 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 36.231 03633 

c 65.29259639 

N 9.35099226 

0 10.90693454 

R 20.33353211 

05748A.B02 A5-43 

1.9975 4 

Std Error 

15.28528990 

19.06499338 

12.18876901 

11.89351575 

18.76352496 

0.1223 

Mean 

36.0150 

66.1175 

8.7020 

11.2030 

20.7150 
Average Velocity (in fps) J 

-.... 

::J 

0 

~ .r:. 

Cl) 

~ 

c 

Q) 

E 

c 

'i~ 

-c: 

w 

"iij 

0 

I250~--------------------------~ 

200-

• 

150-:-

100-

• 

---- ~ •Ill • ~ I • 

-----------·-- 0 - -------- • - ---- - -........ __ 

• • • 

• 

• 

--------!-------

• ... ____ _ 

~­

--...... _ 

·-- -50 -+----1...---...---,-~ ~-~ 1--rl---rl--...,.1----.,1~--t 

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Average Velocity (in fps) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

65.478061 0.0469 1 0.8301 

05748A.B02 A5-44 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.596054 

Root Mean Square Error 26.01521 

Mean of Response 21.85811 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 37 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

lack of Fit 24 20587.025 857.793 15.2593 

Pure Error 7 393.501 56.214 Prob>F 

Total Error 31 20980.525 0.0006 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -21.54372 10.4872 -2.05 0.0485 

Assembla[B·R) 23.158161 10.4133 2.22 0.0336 

Assembla[C-R) -3.862152 12.2113 .0.32 0.7539 

Assembla{N-R) -11.90301 8.03169 -1.48 0.1484 

Assembla[O-R) ·8.004203 7.54784 ·1.06 0.2971 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 17.425741 3.2936 5.29 0.0000 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 4576.874 1.6907 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 1 1 18944.986 27.9924 

05748A.B02 AS-45 

Prob>F 

0.1773 

0.0000 
Whole-Model Test 

0 50 

. I 

. I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

10 

I 

I 

_ _.....--················ 

100 150 

,.-------·· 

200 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source 

Model 

Error 

CTotal 

05748A.B02 

DF 

5 

31 

36 

Sum of Squares 

30958.363 

20980.525 

51938.889 

AS-46 

Mean Square 

6191.67 

676.79 

F Ratio 

9.1486 

Prob>F 

0.0000 
Assemblage Code J 

-.... 

:;, 

0 

-E 

.s:::. 

Cl) 

:;:: 

--c 

CD 

E 

c "! 

-c 

w 

(ij 

;?. 

200-

-

150-

100-

so-

• ... .. !; _ ... -- ---- ---- -- ---- • 

. . . ----··· - ---·--------------~ . ~ --11---~-- ------------------------------·- .........-; -------------------------------------... o- ___ ... . ----·-\ • , 

• • - • 

-50 I I I I I I I 

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio OF Prob>F 

4576.8738 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 48.37194099 

c 21.35162777 

N 13.31 onao6 

o 11.2o9snos 

R 25.82498088 

05748A.B02 AS-47 

1.6907 4 

Std Error 

11.75463233 

13.71804382 

8.25722048 

7.33289456 

13.04341239 

0.1773 

Mean 

39.4980 

59.8060 

9.5600 

10.2900 

20.7150 
Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

200 

• 

-:; 150 

0 

-E 

.s::; 

.sa 

--'E 

Q) 

E 

c:: 

·~ 

-

c: 

w 

i.ij 

0 

1-

100 

• 

50 

0 

-50 -t-7"----:-"T--.,----y------,--,-----i 

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum· of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

18944.986 27.9924 1 0.0000 

05748A.B02 AS-48 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment (fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

A square 0.209848 

Root Mean Square Error 363.4567 

Mean of Response 83.92048 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error 

Intercept 133.34585 111.839 

Assembla[B-R) ·94.09433 124.408 

Assembla[C-R) 428.99748 146.448 

Assembla[N·R) ·119.9108 105.621 

Assembla[O-R] ·107.5916 103.en 

Entrainment Flow (in cfs) ·0.001851 0.03394 

(Effect Test ) 

t Ratio 

1.19 

.0.76 

2.93 

·1.14 

·1.04 

.0.05 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 1152152.7 

Entrainment Flow (in cfs) 1 1 393.0 

05748A.B02 AS-49 

Prob>ltl 

0.2409 

0.4544 

0.0059 

0.2638 

0.3063 

0.9568 

F Ratio Prob.>F 

2.1804 0.0908 

0.0030 0.9568 
Whole-Model Test J 

2500 -r-----.----~r-------~ 

2000-

'§" 

0 .e 1500- .s::. 

.!!! 

:::. 

'E 

Q) 1000-

E 

c: 

"i! 

'E 

w 

"i 

~ 

5oo- I 

I 

I 

,' 

I ' 

' ' 

I 

I ' 

/ 

I 

,' 

I 

' . 

I 

, 

I 

,' 

,' 

I 

, 

I 

,' 

/ 

, 

,' 

I 

, 

I 

I 

0- ,.--------.... ____________ _ 

------------------------

-500 -+---..-..,...-- ,-r---.,r--r--..,...- ,-,---.,-...,...---1 

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source 

Model 

Error 

CTotal 

05748A.B02 

DF 

5 

36 

41 

Sum of Squares 

1262995.0 

4755628.6 

6018623.6 

AS-50 

Mean Square 

252599 

132101 

F Ratio 

1.9122 

Prob>F 

0.1165 
Assemblage Code J 

2500--r--------------.----. 

-.... 

:;:, 

0 

2000-

-<E 1500 ~ .c 

(IJ 

00::::: 

--

c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

1000- .,,"' 

,_.,.'' 

.. -

_ .... .. -

·c;; 

... 

-c: 

w 

(ij 

~ 

_ .. 

500- ~ .... ---" - .. - - • ...... ------· ---------- 0- . -. ,_ -----------------------------------.& .. --- __ .. -- . --- -500 I I I I I I 

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio DF Prob>F 

1152152.7 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 34.7901414 

c 557.8819521 

N 8.9736517 

0 21.2928987 

A 21.4837116 

05748A.B02 A5-51 

2.1804 4 

Std Error 

139.6282462 

170.4348379 

1 05.8233942 

99.8258251 

182.27 40816 

0.0908 

Mean 

33.427 

555.086 

9.726 

22.548 

20.715 
Entrainment Flow (in cfs) ) 

...::-

:3 

0 

2500~--------------------------~ 

2000- . • 

.e 1500-

.c: 

(I) 

s 

-

~ 1000-

E 

c: ·e 

'E 

w 

i.U 

~ • • ··-~ ... -- - . o- • --------------... ~··"· -·---.. ~----· ...... , ...... . -----~ .. • I • ............... -500 --+-----rl.:....;;;..---r-1---.,--1--......,1---""T'I-~ 

-2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 

Entrainment Flow (in cfs) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

392.97066 0.0030 1 0.9568 

05748A.B02 AS-52 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Total Entrainment {fish/hour) 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare o.3n2a9 

Root Mean Square Error 20.64274 

Mean of Response 17.39214 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 28 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept ·13.87952 19.6157 -o.71 0.4874 

Assembla(B-R) 22.31279 8.n862 2.54 0.0194 

Assembla[C·R) ·8.05055 13.3971 -o.6o 0.5546 

Assembla(N·R] -9.549192 7.40812 -1.29 0.2121 

Assembla(O-R) -s.36n92 7.32307 -o.B7 0.3949 

Average Velocity (in fps) 7.8745218 5.64123 1.40 0.1781 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 8.3474907 5.60034 1.49 0.1517 

Reservoir length (In mUes) -o.300984 1.82798 -o.16 0.8709 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares F Ratio Prob>F 

Assemblage Code 4 4 3466.6223 2.0338 0.1282 

Average Velocity (in fps) 1 1 830.3005 1.9485 0.1781 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 1 1 946.7114 2.2217 0.1517 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 1 1 11.5526 0.0271 0.8709 

05748A.B02 AS-53 
Whole-Model Test 

100~--------------~~----------~ 

c 

CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 

c 

w 

iii 

~ 

90 

80 

70 

60 

50 

40 

30 

20 

10 

I 

a I 

_____ . . .,..-,' 

' ,' 

I 

., I 

,' 

I 

I 

, 

, 

I I. I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

' , •• , 

, 

I 

I 

I 

I ' I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

01--+~F-~~-r~--r-~-r~~ 

·10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 

Total Entrainment (fish/hour) Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) _ 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 7 5163.599 

Error 20 8522.457 

C Total '0 13686.056 

05748A.B02 AS-54 

Mean Square 

737.657 

426.123 

F Ratio 

1.7311 

Prob>F 

0.1584 
Assemblage Code J 

-:::-

::J 

0 

.e 

.t::. 

(/) 

s 

c: 

(I) 

E 

c 

-~ 

... 

c: 

w 

(ij 

0 

..... 

100~------------------------~ 

so60-

• 

40-

• ,•" ..... •" .20- , _____ ..., ___ 

. _ ,.......... . 

, .. ......... ·" 

,.,'" , .. ........... 

• 

. ," 

,,"' 

" " , 

--------r-••• 11 • -------·------------------------ • •. 

. . _, .---··------------------------- .......... -- • . .. o- .... •'• 

, ... • • . , " 

,' 

-20 I I I I 

5 10 15 20 25 

Assemblage Code 

I I I 

30 35 40 45 

Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio OF Prob>F 

3466.6223 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 40.83428459 

c 1 0.47094378 

N 8.97230205 

0 12.15370234 

R 20.17623799 

05748A.B02 AS-55 

2.0338 4 

Std Error 

9.45303534 

16.02869100 

7.34081641 

6.99434500 

10.340397 41 

0.1282 

Mean 

39.4980 

18.1450 

8.2387 

11.6033 

20.7150 
Average Velocity (in fps) J 

'E 

CD 

E 

c::: 

-~ 

'E 

w 

<G 

~ 

100-r----------------------------------~ 

so-

-20-r----~.---..----~~----~.----,,-----.-1--_, 

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 

Average Velocity (in fps) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares 

S30.30046 

F Ratio 

1.9485 

OF 

1 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) J 

.... 

:;:, 

0 

.e: 

.c: 

II) 

~ 

'E 

CD 

E 

c::: 

-~ 

'E 

w 

co 

~ 

100-r--------------------------------------~ 

so-

• 

60-

_ ... --... __ ,..,. ~~ 

~~~ 

......... -

20-~ 

0- ~~~~~·---- - • . 

40-

~ 

~ 

. ~~ 

~~' 

. -20 • 

I I I I I 

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches} Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

05748A.B02 

Sum of Squares 

946.71135 

F Ratio 

2.2217 

AS-56 

OF 

1 

Prob>F 

0.17S1 

Prob>F 

0.1517 
Reservoir Length (in miles) J 

-._ 

:::3 

0 

100~--------------------------~ 

so-

-E so- . • .s::. 

(/) 

!E.. • • 

40- ~ ,,,____ ------p . ---· 

-------.. . . ----------- ·--·------- • • • 20- ------- • ------------- • • • . -----------------· • .• ___ !--- • .. ..... __ _ --· --.. __ o- • . ---,_ -~ .. _ 

• 

• 

• • 

-20 -+--......-,-.,--1---r-1--rl--rl-....,lr----lr--......-l--t 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

Reservoir Length (in miles) Lever:age 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of _Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

11.552580 0.0271 1 0.8709 

05748A.B02 AS-57 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 

Root Mean Square Error 

Mean of Response 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 

0.347585 

84.39258 

27.43186 

41 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source DF 

Lack of Fit 34 

Pure Error 1 

Total Error 35 

Sum of Squares 

249266.53 

722. 

249273.75 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Mean Square 

7331.37 

7.22 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 81.849035 24.1078 3.40 

Assembla[B-R] -10.80629 29.721 -0.36 

Assembla[C-R] 145.46872 34.7617 4.18 

Assembla[N-R] -43.5273 24.5549 -1.n 

Assembla[O-R] -51.23961 25.3986 -2.02 

Ave. River Flow (cfs) -0.019403 0.00864 -2.25 

(Effect Test ) 

F Ratio 

1015.808 

Prob>F 

0.0248 

Prob>ltl 

0.0017 

0.7184 

0.0002 

0.0850 

0.0514 

0.0312 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares F Ratio Prob>F 

Assemblage Code 4 4 129901.11 4.5598 0.0045 

Ave. River Flow (cfs) 1 , 35911.97 5.0423 0.0312 

05748A.B02 AS-58 
Whole-Model Test 

700 

600 

II) 500 ~ ... 

.e 400 .&. 

s 

CD 300 1ii 

~ 

... 

c 

CD 200 

E 

c • --~----- 'iii 100 _ ..... ~ 

= ___ .. c 

w 

0 

-100 

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)Jkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 132804.94 

Error 35 249273.75 

c Total 40 382078.70 

05748A.B02 AS-59 

700 

Mean Square 

26561.0 

7122.1 

F Ratio 

3.7294 

Prob>F 

0.0082 
Assemblage Code J 

-

c: 

Cl) 

E 

c: 

·a; 

... 

c: 

w 

6oo500-

400-

300-. 

200-

-100 1 l T 1 I T I 

-50 0 50 100 150 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

• 

• 

T 

200 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

129901.11 4.5598 4 0.0045 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 33.6091156 

c 189.8841249 

N 0.8880973 

0 -6.8242093 

A 4.5198ns 

05748A.B02 AS-60 

Std Error 

33.46248941 

40.35076868 

24.57196522 

24.61340881 

42.21288755 

Mean 

10.898 

157.830 

8.085 

10.272 

7.178 
Ave. River Flow (cfs) 

U) 

~ -... 

-E 

.s:.: 

U) 

;;::: 

-(I) 

1i 

a: 

-c: 

(I) 

E 

c: .(ij 

... 

-c: 

w 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

0 

-100 

-200 

-2000 0 2000 4000 

Ave. River Flow (cfs) 

6000 8000 1 0000 

Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

3591 1.966 5.0423 1 0.0312 

05748A.B02 AS-61 
.. 

Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.792717 

Root Mean Square Error 49.92275 

M aan of Response 32.59445 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 41 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept ·8.042385 10.8193 -0.74 0.4622 

Assembla[B-R) -3.418664 17.5225 -0.20 0.8464 

Assembla[C-R] 33.64719 24.3788 1.38 0.1763 

Assembla[N-R] -4.410885 14.8163 -0.30 o.76n 

Assembla[O-R] -10.49493 13.719 -0.76 0.4494 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 0.0460331 0.00494 9.32 0.0000 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 5488.71 0.5506 

Reservoir Size (in acres) 1 1 216474.79 86.8581 

05748A.B02 AS-62 

Prob>F 

0.6998 

0.0000 
Whole-Model Test 

Cll 

iii 

a: 

c 

Cll 

E 

c:: 

~~ 

c 

w 

600 

300 

200 

100 

0 

-100 -f----~__,.---,--~---,r---..--.....----1 

-1 00 0 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source 

Model 

Error 

CTotal 

05748A.B02 

DF 

5 

35 

40 

Sum of Squares 

333595.94 

87229.84 

420825.79 

AS-63 

Mean Square 

66719.2 

2492.3 

F. Ratio 

2s.n03 

Prob>F 

0.0000 
...., 

Assemblage Code J 

(/) 

-

~ -... 

..c. 

..t:: 

-(/) 

:0:: 

-CD 

n; 

a: 

-

c: 

CD 

E 

s::: 

·a; 

.... 

-

s::: 

w 

700~--------------------------~ 

600-

5oo400-

300-

200-

100-

o-

-100-

• 

. __ ....... _, -- __ , ,,~ 

~~~ 

-~-

~-

-----------':.--· -="-- ___ ,__ • 

----------- - ----------------·-----·---- -~ .~---·'----------- ~--·--· . ----~------- ~--- rl' • ---------

• 

-200 -+---r,---r,---r-1---r-1---r--,-r-1-----i 

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

5488.7114 0.5506 4 0.6998 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 3'84632704 

c 69.91218099 

N 31.85410625 

o 2s.noo6494 

R 20.94227565 

05748A.B02 AS-64 

Std Error 

19.01542551 

28.25816280 

14.63538678 

13.34241691 

25.00503082 

Mean 

10.898 

193.361 

8.085 

25.779 

7.178 
Reservoir Size (in acres) 

~ -.... 

€ 

.J::. 

en 

:0:: -Q) 

-as 

a: 

-

c 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·a 

.... 

-

c: 

w 

700~--------------------------~ 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

0 

-100 

-200 

-5000 0 

• 

, , 

/• 

, , 

, 

, • 

, , 

, 

, 

, • 

, 

, 

, , 

~~' ,'' , ,'' ,~ ,' , , , ,' ~' ,' ~' ,'' ,' _, , , ,' ,,' , , , , , , ,' ,' , # ,' 

, , , ,' ,t~' , , , 

5----------------------------- -· • 

5000 10000 

Reservoir Size (in acres) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

21647 4.79 86.8581 1 0.0000 

05748A.B02 A5-65 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.74923 

Root Mean Square Error 54.66423 

Mean of Response 28.41341 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 38 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept ·1.580173 11.8405 ..0.13 0.8947 

Assembla[B-R) -D21986 20.5781 ..0.01 0.9915 

Assembla(C-R) 26.42937 28.5734 0.92 0.3619 

Assembla(N-R] 1.0153242 17.0021 0.06 0.9528 

Assembla[O-R] -18.13871 15.5887 -1.16 0.2532 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 0.0015726 0.00021 7.41 0.0000 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares F Ratio Prob>F 

Assemblage Code 4 4 5795.63 0.4849 0.7467 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) 1 1 164017.65 54.8889 0.0000 

05748A.B02 AS-66 
Whole-Model 

700 

600 

..!!! 500 

~ .... 

~ 400 ..._ 

~ 

(/) 

s 

CD 300 iU 

a: 

-

c: 200 CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 100 

c: 

w 

Test 

/ 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

/ 

/ 

~ 

/ 

,,'' 

, 

-100 -fC-,,1---r----.,r--~--r---r--r--~---l 

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 285690.94 

Error 32 95621.69 

C Total 37 381312.63 

05748A.B02 AS-67 

Mean Square 

57138.2 

2988.2 

F Ratio 

19.1214 

Prob>F 

0.0000 
Assemblage Code J 700~--------------------------~ 

600-

~ 5oo-

~ -::::- 400- ~ .s:::. 

(I) 

~ 300-

Q) 

c; 

c: 200-

'E 

• 

--· ---- --- __ . 100- .-·---·· -·------- . - ......... ~-

Q) 

E 

c:::: 

·~ 

'E 

w 

~-·-----·---- ~ . . -----~----~----- ~ ---------------------- 0 :.----- ~-- --------- ---! ... ~---· • --------- ----~. 

----~· 

-100- • 

-200 - I I I I I I 

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of .Squares F Ratio DF Prob>F 

5795.6341 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 32.31410291 

c 58.96333332 

N 33.54928719 

0 14.39525077 

A 23.44784075 

05748A.B02 A5-68 

0.4849 4 

Std Error 

22.54967111 

32.80429322 

16.82414774 

15.17134045 

27.42019647 

0.7467 

Mean 

8.355 

193.361 

8.535 

10.272 

7.178 
Total Storage (in ac-ft) 

0 

-

~ -... 

..c. 

.!a 

.c: 

-

--

Q) 

ca 

a: 

-c:: 

Q) 

E 

c:: 

·m ... 

-c:: 

w 

700~--------------------------~ 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

0 

·100 

-200 

. , , , 

, , , , 

, , , 

, 

, , 

,' 

, 

, , , , 

, ," ,~~ .,., , ,, ,,' ~,'~ 

,' #),' 

,"' .,..,,'' 

,' ,' ,' ,,' ,' ,"'"" ,,' , ... '' ,, ,'' . , ,, -------- ---,~ .,:&.--------------·---------------. .,.,' ," , " , , ,,' ,' ,,.' ,' , , , . , 

, , ~ 

, , 

• 

-100000 0 50000 150000 250000 

Total Storage (in ac-ft) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

164017.65 54.8889 1 0.0000 

05748A.B02 AS-69 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.997405 

Root Mean Square Error 8.814261 

Mean of Response 41.71965 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 18 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 1.1560372 2.92139 0.40 0.6993 

Assembla(B·R) -3.361273 7.40363 .0.45 0.6579 

Assembla(C·R] -4.833045 7.399n .0.65 0.5260 

Assembla(N·R] 5.5824037 4.00367 1.39 0.1885 

Assembla[Q.R) ·1.913619 4.00705 ·0.48 0.6415 

Usable Storage (in ac.ft) 0.003601 0.00007 49.97 0.0000 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 260.80 0.8392 

Usable Storage (in ac.ft) 1 1 193975.71 2496.753 

05748A.B02 AS-70 

Prob>F 

0.5262 

0.0000 
Whole-Model Test 

700 

600 

(I) 

- 500 ! .... 

, 

, 

, 

,' ,' , ,' , ~' , , , , , , , , ,,'· ,'" , , , , , , , , , , ' , , ., ,' . , , , -E 400 .c 

(I) 

=.. ,,'::,,' 

41 300 iii 

a: 

-c:: 200 41 

E 

c:: 

'iii 

.... 100 -

c:: 

w 

0 

, , , . , , , , , . , , . , .,-

, . . , , , .,':,' 

-100 -¥'---r----.--.......--.--..-----.---.---i 

-1 00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 

Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 358307.78 

Error 12 932.29 

C Total 17 359240.07 

05748A.B02 A5-71 

Mean Square 

71661.6 

n.7 

F Ratio 

922.3896 

Prob>F 

0.0000 
Assemblage Code l 700~------------------------~ 

600-

Cl) 

-

~ 5oo-

--~ 

-cE 

.s:::. 

-~ 400- :::::, 

(I) 

1U 

a: 300- -

c 

(I) 

E 

c 

·a; 200- ,._ 

-

c 

w 

100-

:::::::::··--~------- ----------·----~------ ---:----------~------ .....-=----====== :: 

o~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~---~~~ 

34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

260.79627 0.8392 4 0.5262 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 37.1 0493082 

c 35.63315933 

N 46.04860768 

0 38.55258546 

R 44.99173687 

05748A.B02 AS-72 

Std Error 

8.838584101 

8.330217570 

3.662155741 

3.664197472 

5.140026752 

Mean 

4.363 

311.800 

12.054 

4.013 

8.862 
Usable Storage (in ac-ft) 

600 

500 

0 -

~ 400 -... 

tE 

.s::. 300 0 

s 

CD 200 1a 

a: 

-c: 100 

CD 

E 

c: 0 ·as ... 

-

c: 

w -100 

-200 

-300 .. 

-100000 0 50000 1 00000 150000 20000 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

193975.71 2496.753 1 0.0000 

05748A.B02 AS-73 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)'/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.508939 

Root Mean Square Error 78.84314 

Mean of Response 29.91766 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Lack of Fit .29 186476.15 6430.21 580.8715 

Pure Error 1 11.07 11.07 Prob>F 

Total Error 30 186487.22 0.0328 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 34.131664 20.2156 1.69 0.1017 

Assembla(B·R) ·29.00547 31.4819 .0.92 0.3642 

Assembla[C·R] 135.81644 50.4243 2.69 0.0115 

Assembla(N·R] ·32.54186 25.8896 ·1.26 0.2185 

Assembla(O..R] -41.5103 23.422 -1.77 0.0865 

Reservoir Aush Rate (in days) 3.2236364 1.6562 1.95 0.0610 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 51071.795 2.0540 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) 1 1 23550.081 3.7885 

05748A.B02 AS-74 

Prob>F 

0.1119 

0.0610 
Whole-Model Test 

700 ' ' ' , ' 

• 600 , 

, 

/ , 

I , 

, (/) 500 , 

I , 

/ , ... , ' 

-E 400 ' ' ~ 

(/) ' / s ' ' Q) 300 ' ' iii 

a: ................. 

- -· c: 

Q) 200 

E 

c: 

·a; 

... 100 -

c: 

w 

·1 00 4'-..,.<-..---.---.--~-..----T--,---1 

·1 00 0 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)Jkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance J 

Source DF Sum of Squares 

Model 5 193276.45 

Error 30 186487.22 

C Total 35 379763.67 

05748A.B02 AS-75 

Mean Square 

38655.3 

6216.2 

F Ratio 

6.2184 

Prob>F 

0.0005 
Assemblage Code J 

(I) 

~ -.... 

.e 

.c 

(I) 

:0::: -

CD 

-as 

c: 

-c: 

CD 

E 

c: 

·a 

.... 

-

c: 

w 

700~------------------------~ 

600-

500-

400-

300-

200-

100-

o-

-1oo-

,,~' 

, , 

, 

/ 

, , , 

. ,,' 

, , ,' , ,' , ,' , , , , , , ,' ,' 

, 

,' 

:::~::::::~~~~~~--' ----------------------•------

. ,' , ,' 

, , , , 

, .,, 

, 

, .. , .. --------------------~--------­

• 

-200 -+-...,4--,.,-~,-----,-,----,-,--r, --~ 1---1 

-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

51071.795 2.0540 4 0.1119 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 22.0914720 

c 186.9133897 

N 18.5550847 

0 9.5866443 

A 18.3381414 

05748A.B02 AS-76 

Std Error 

32.95216438 

58.24200763 

24.32310235 

21.86998729 

45.n9697as 

Mean 

8.355 

257.631 

8.535 

10.272 

8.862 
Reservoir Flush Rate {in days) J 700~--------------------------~ 

soosoo-

-300 -+----,-, ----,,.-----.-,--,.-----.-,--,.------r-,----t 

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

23550.081 3.7885 1 0.0610 

05748A.B02 A5-77 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 

Root Mean Square Error 

Mean of Response 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 

(Lack of Fit ) 

0.103479 

10.48048 

9.92n98 

35 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Lack of F~ 28 3185.2912 

Pure Error 1 0.0830 

Total Error 29 3185.3742 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Mean Square 

113.760 

0.083 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 13.542404 3.08579 4.39 

Assembla[B·R) 2.168316 4.20778 0.52 

Assambla[C.R) 0.0261143 5.16047 0.01 

Assambla[N-R) ·1.096854 3.22429 -0.34 

Assembla[O-R] 1.9no167 3.24357 0.61 

Reservoir Length (in miles) -0.895233 0.59661 ·1.50 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Coda 4 4 117.87522 

Reservoir Length (in miles) 1 1 247.31520 

05748A.B02 A5-78 

F Ratio 

1370.658 

Prob>F 

0.0214 

Prob>ltl 

0.0001 

0.6102 

0.9960 

0.7362 

0.5469 

0.1443 

F Ratio 

0.2683 

2.2516 

Prob>F 

0.8960 

0.1443 
Whole-Model Test 

45,--------------7----------~ , 

, 

, 

, 40 , 

' , 

, 

, 

35 • , 

, J2 , 

~ 

, 

. • ;::... ' 30 . ... , € , 

. .c . UJ 25 ·: :::.. ' ' , CD ' ' . iU ' . ' , a: 20 ' ' ' ' . ' . • 'E ' , ' ' •• CD ' • ' E 15 ' ' . ' , - c: • .. ' 

"ii 

... - 10 c: 

w 

5 

0 

0 10 20 30 40 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)Jkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance J 

Source OF Sum of Squares 

Model 5 367.6630 

Error 29 3185.3742 

C Total 34 3553.0373 

05748A.B02 A5-79 

Mean Square 

73.533 

109.840 

F Ratio 

0.6694 

Prob>F 

0.6497 
Assemblage Code ) 

CD 

ta 

a: 

c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·m 

.... 

-c: 

w 

40-

6 

I 

7 

I 

8 

• 

I 

9 

1 

10 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

I 

11 

• • 

• 

12 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

117.87522 0.2683 4 0.8960 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 11.80238965 

c 9.66018799 

N 8.53721961 

0 11.611 09035 

R 6.55948090 

05748A.B02 AS-80 

Std Error 

4.765716772 

6.128782388 

3.163318294 

3.085769455 

5.256418886 

Mean 

13.0966 

11.1215 

8.3193 

10.7001 

7.1778 
Reservoir Length (in miles) 

(I) 

-

~ 

--..... 

,e 

..r: 

(I) 

;: 

-

CD 

a; 

c: 

-

c 

CD 

E 

c 

·n; 

..... 

-c 

w 

40 

30 

20 

10 

0 

' ' 

• 

• 

',, . ' · .. ... . .... .. 

.... . 

• 

. ' ..... 

.-------------------- • 

-·-------.. __ , . ..,....... . • •• It, 

. . . "",, . . .. ..... .. . " " ... . ... ... 

' 

0 5 10 

-------·--·-

15 20 

Reservoir Length (in miles) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F . 247.31520 2.2516 1 0.1443 

05748B.B02 AS-81 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit J 

Rsquare 0.078447 

Root Mean Square Error 11.2m5 

Mean of Response 9.237517 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 25 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 7.4574895 3.70336 2.01 0.0584 

Assembla[B-R] 5.7156422 5.96477 0.96 0.3500 

Assembla(C-R) 3.2501867 6.09085 0.53 0.5998 

Assembla[N·R] -0.485499 4.27169 -0.11 0.9107 

Assembla[O-R) -1.02302 4.52245 -0.23 0.8235 

Reservoir Width (feet) 0.0008169 0.00117 0.70 0.4943 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 181.09855 0.3560 

Reservoir Width (feat) 1 1 61.76189 0.4856 

05748B.B02 A5-82 

Prob>F 

0.8367 

0.4943 
Whole-Model Test 

45 . 

, 

. 

, 

40 , 

, 

, 

. 

, 

. 35 , II) , 

I , 

, 

. 30 , ... , 

€ , 

, ~ 

, 

. ~ 25 , . , 

, Cll , 

, c;; , 20 , a: , 

, 

-

c: 

Cll 

E 15 c: 

·a 

... 

-

c: 10 

w 

5 

0 

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 

Entrainment Rata (fish/hr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 205.7110 

Error 19 2416.5670 

C Total 24 2622.2780 

05748B.B02 A5-83 

45 

Mean Square 

41.142 

127.188 

F Ratio 

0.3235 

Prob>F 

0.8926 
Assemblage Code ) 

Cl) 

~ -... 

.e:: 

.s::. 

Cl) 

s 

CD 

1U 

a: 

-c 

CD 

E 

c '!! 

'E 

w 

40-

-

30-

20-

-

• 

• 

, 

, , 

, 

, 

, 

, 

.. , . ············ ..... __ //,/ 

• ---. ...... __ ,' ~' . . - ,,.-~ .. _______ . 

• 

10- ----------------------------- -----------------

.. . . ~·--- ... ... -,~~· ...... ~ 

,, ,' . .............. . ,' ...... ,' . ... ... 

-

o- , , , 

I I I I I 

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

181.09855 0.3560 4 0.8367 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 14.71861922 

c 12.25316366 

N 8.51747748 

0 7.97995704 

A 1.54566749 

057488.802 A5-84 

Std Error 

6.57596963 

6.71066196 

3.80523062 

3.99285385 

11.30824991 

Mean 

14.0771 

11.1215 

8.1065 

8.9177 

2.1240 
Reservoir Width (feet) 

CD 

n; 

a: 

-

c 

CD 

E 

c 

"iij 

... 

-c 

w 

• 

40 

30 

20 

10 

0 

-2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 

Reservoir Width (feet) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

61.761893 0.4856 1 0.4943 

05748B.B02 AS-85 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.241097 

Root Mean Square Error 94.21858 

Mean of Response 32.19241 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept sa.24no1 30.3325 2.25 

Assembla(B-R] -27.84632 32.1889 -o.B7 

Assembla(C-R] 130.139n 39.0302 3.33 

Assembla[N-R] -41.2no2 27.5914 -1.50 

Assembla[O-R] -26.22492 27.2315 -o.96 

Plant Flow Qn cfs) -0.009302 0.00905 -1.03 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 101143.95 

Plant Flow (in cfs) 1 1 9375.69 

05748B.B02 AS-86 

Prob>ltl 

0.0307 

0.3927 

0.0020 

0.1434 

0.3420 

0.3109 

F Ratio Prob>F 

2.8484 0.0378 

1.0562 0.3109 
Whole-Model Test 

600 

II) 500 

~ ... 

.e: 400 ..r::. 

.Ia 

:::::.. 

Gl 300 iij 

a: 

c 

Gl 200 

E 

c ·e 100 

c 

w 

0 

-100 -t'-__,.;..-r---..,.---r---r--..---r--...,----i 

-1 00 0 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares 

Model 5 101527.07 

Error 36 319577.04 

C Total 41 421104.11 

05748B.B02 AS-87 

Mean Square 

20305.4 

asn.1 

F Ratio 

2.2874 

Prob>F 

0.0664 
Assemblage Code ] 

700~------------------------~ 

Q) 

m 

a: 

c 

Q) 

E 

c:: 

·~ 

c 

w 

600-

sao400-

300-

• 200-

100-

-50 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

• 

• 

200 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

1 01143.95 2.8484 4 0.0378 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 17.3428711 

c 175.3289589 

N 3.9121676 

0 18.9642699 

A 1 0.3976773 

05748B.B02 AS-88 

Std Error 

36.15926199 

45.44606230 

27.49998982 

26.03953285 

47.21335773 

Mean 

10.898 

157.830 

8.085 

25.779 

7.178 
Plant Flow (in cfs) J 

700~--------------------------~ 

~ 

~ -

600-

500-

-.:::- 400- ~ .s::. 

en 

s 300-

CD 

1U 

a: 200-

-c: 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·c;s 

'-c 

w 

-100- • 

• 

• 

--- • --... ....... ----- I I I I I -200 -+------,.---..,..-----r------,---.,.-----i 

-2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 

Plant Flow (in cfs) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

9375.6883 1.0562 1 0.31 09 

05748B.B02 A5-89 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate {fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.329884 

Root Mean Square Error 88.06525 

Mean of Response 27.62058 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 39 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Lack of Fit 11 253678.14 23061.6 225.1952 

Pure Error 22 2252.96 102.4 Prob>F 

Total Error 33 255931.10 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

, Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 51.374334 18.0254 2.85 0.0075 

Assembla{B·R] -35.89792 30.3158 ·1.18 0.2448 

Assembla{C·R] 158.30511 40.7491 3.88 0.0005 

Assembla(N-R] -38.03458 25.2884 ·1.50 0.1421 

Assembla{O·R] -40.17611 25.6817 ·1.56 0.1273 

Intake Submergence (in feat) -1.305494 1.94203 -o.67 0.5061 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 120197.38 3.8746 

Intake Submergence (in feet) 1 1 3504.69 0.4519 

05748B.B02 A5-90 

Prob>F 

0.0109 

0.5061 
Whole-Model Test 

600 

.!!! 500 ! ... 

-E 400 .c 

Ill 

:5 

Cll 300 iii 

a: 

-

c: 

Cll 200 

E 

c 

"iii 

... 100 -

c: 

w 

0 

-100 -f<--l--r-----r---,--..,.---,,-----r--r---1 

·1 00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 

Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 125989.75 

Error 33 255931.10 

C Total 38 381920.85 

05748B.B02 AS-91 

Mean Square 

25197.9 

nss.s 

F Ratio 

3.2490 

Prob>F 

0.0171 
Assemblage Code ) 

Q) 

1\i 

a: 

'E 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·c;; 

... 

-c: 

w 

• 600-

500-

400- , .. /' 

300- , ..... 

200- ....... ' 

100- ,,·"'' 

,.,""' , ... 

,... . 

,' ,' 

,' , .. 

, ........... ' 

, 

~·--·c=::•;-' ----~·-·•======:::::::::::::::::::: _, . o-. . .,,' -·-' . , ............. ' 

-100 , I I I I I 

·50 0 50 100 150 200 250 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

120197.38 3.8746 4 0.0109 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 1 0.5272555 

c 204.7302800 

N 8.3905965 

0 6.2490572 

A 2.2286687 

05748B.B02 AS-92 

Std Error 

33.2901 0026 

47.16909081 

25.42630761 

25.63764887 

44.64386788 

Mean 

10.898 

193.361 

8.085 

8.478 

7.178 
Intake Submergence (in feet) J 

soocn soo--

~ • 

~ 400-

..c 

-

E. 300-

-c 

CD 

E 

c 

·a 

... 

-c 

w 

200-

100- ----- --------------- ~~ -~---

----~·---------------- ----- . ...... -------,..---·--------------------- 0 - ------~---~- • --- -·---~- ---------------------- ------~ 

-100-

• 

• • -200 -+-~.--r-,-,.--,-r---,-..-----r,--r----r--1--.-~ 

-10 0 10 20 30 40 

Intake Submergence (in feet) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

3504.6880 0.4519 1 0.5061 

05748B.B02 AS-93 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.268117 

Root Mean Square Error 21.90541 

Mean of Response 13.08726 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 33 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square 

Lack of Fit 25 12937.018 517.481 

Pure Error 2 18.849 9.424 

Total Error 27 12955.867 

. (Parameter Estimates J 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 20.438544 6.7355 3.03 

Assembla(B-R) -5.292173 8.19366 -0.65 

Assembla(C-R) 31.537137 10.8719 2.90 

Assembla(N-R) -7.74845 7.18067 -1.08 

Assembla(O-R) -7.8494n 6.87088 -1.14 

Average Velocity (in fps) -1.460155 2.54118 -0.57 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 4 4 4134.0145 

Average Velocity (in fps) 1 1 158.4273 

05748B.B02 AS-94 

F Ratio 

54.9087 

Prob>F 

0.0180 

Prob>ltl 

0.0053 

0.5238 

0.0073 

0.2901 

0.2633 

0.5703 

F Ratio Prob>F 

2.1538 0.1015 

0.3302 0.5703 
Whole-Model Test 

150 , 

, ' 

' , • , 

, 

125 , 

, 

, 

, 

J2 , 

, 

, 

4 , 

. 100 . .... . € , 

, .s:::: , 

, II) , s , 

. CD 75 , 

, iii , 

. a: , 

, 

'E , 

, 

, CD , 

, E 50 c: 

'iii 

.... 

'E 

w 25 

0 

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance J 

Source D F Sum of Squares 

Model 5 47 46.232 

Error '0 12955.867 

c Total 32 1 no2.099 

05748B.B02 A5-95 

Mean Square 

949.246 

479.847 

F Ratio 

1.9782 

Prob>F 

0.1142 
Assemblage Code J 

... 

c: 

Cll 

E 

c: 

"iij 

... ... 

c: 

w 

150~------------------------~ 

• -

100-

, .......... .. 

- , .... ...... ,""*'' , .. 

so- , ................... .. 

• -~""'' .... .. .. • , .. . ..., .. ..... -----.. --; --- • .&.-- .. --::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :_ 

... ------ ·-

o- • .J·~· ..... . • 

I I I I I I I I 

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio DF Prob>F 

4134.0145 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 11.90748231 

c 48.73679203 

N 9.45120504 

0 9.35017900 

R 6.55261924 

05748B.B02 AS-96 

2.1538 4 

Std Error 

8.95852517 

12.s7n5562 

7.13315717 

6.97989014 

11.00661912 

0.1015 

Mean 

11.6031 

50.1310 

8.4732 

9.8425 

1.1na 
Average Velocity (in fps) J 

150.-------------------------~ 

• 

so-

• 

• ~-.. ----- - ------........ . _ ... -------------- . ·-~----------- ------------- . . -----------------•-------· _. __ .. ~ __ ... _, -""'• __ •!'!.. . . • • . o- ---- . ·---. -...... _ 

------.. --- . ---.. -- - -- • 

·50 -+---..,,----,,----,,---,,---.l---.l----.l---.l----1 

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Average Velocity (in fps) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

158.42733 0.3302 1 0.5703 

05748B.B02 AS-97 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.536647 

Root Mean Square Error 16.8146 

Mean of Response 13.12547 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 36 

(Lack of Fit ) 

Source OF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Lack of Fit 23 8436.7593 366.816 56.8522 

Pure Error 7 45.1647 6.452 Prob>F 

Total Error 30 8481.9240 0.0000 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept -16.30004 7.64508 -2.13 0.0413 

Asaembla[B-R} 5.8898801 6.88728 0.86 0.3992 

Asaembla[C-RJ -2.860674 9.47986 -o.30 0.7649 

Assembla[N-RJ -2.5173 5.32374 -o.47 0.6397 

Assembla(O-RJ 1.8525659 5.06291 037 0.7170 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 10.812695 2.3329 4.63 0.0001 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 307.3060 0.2717 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 1 1 6073.6327 21.4820 

05748B.B02 AS-98 

Prob>F 

0.8939 

0.0001 
Whole-Model Test 

J!! 

~ 100 ... 

oE 

..c:: 

s 

(I) 75 n; 

a: 

-

c: 

CD 

E 50 c: 

"iij • 

~ w 25 

0 

0 50 100 

Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares 

Model 5 9823.607 

Error 30 8481.924 

C Total . 35 18305.531 

05748B.B02 AS-99 

150 

Mean Square 

1964.72 

282.73 

F Ratio 

6.9491 

Prob>F 

0.0002 
Assemblage Code J 

(I) 

~ -.... 

~ ..c 

(I) 

;: 

-

CD 

1ii 

a: 

-c: 

CD 

E 

c: 

-~ 

-

c: 

w 

150~------------------------~ 

100-

• 

so- • 

.. , .... ..... - -~ 

-~ ~- -- . ~-~----

--------------------·-·j·-- . --~------------ .. --------------~----=-- I • -------·---··-·--•~-.---- ...... ____ _ 

0- ~--~-.. -----·---- -- . • • 

• 

I I I I I I I I I I 

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio DF Prob>F 

307.30599 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean 

8 18.80814600 

c 10.05759150 

N 1 0.40096551 

o 14.noa3179 

R 1 0.55379450 

0.2717 4 

Std Error 

7.62001959 

10.80641019 

5.34524571 

4.76347322 

8.43879390 

05748B.B02 AS-100 

0.8939 

Mean 

13.096G 

41.5255 

7.8684 

10.2720 

1.1ns 
Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) 

CD 

iii 

a: 

c 

CD 

E 

c: 

"I! 

c: 

w 

150~--------------------------~ 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 

Trash Rack Spacing (in inches) Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

6073.6327 21.4820 1 0.0001 

05748B.B02 AS-101 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.229256 

Root Mean Square Error 94.95081 

Mean of Response 32.19241 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 42 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio Prob>ltl 

Intercept 58.816143 29.2173 2.01 0.0516 

Assembla(B-R) -28.4532 32.5008 -0.88 0.3871 

Assembla[G-R) 123.26829 38.2587 3.22 0.0027 

Assembla[N-R) -38.33485 27.5928 -1.39 0.1733 

Assembla(Q-R] -22.32091 27.0849 -0.82 0.4153 

Entrainment Flow (in cfs) -0.006187 0.00887 -0.70 0.4898 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm DF Sum of Squares F Ratio 

Assemblage Code 4 4 96029.582 2.6629 

Entrainment Flow (in cfs) 1 1 4389.072 0.4868 

05748B.B02 AS-102 

Prob>F 

0.0481 

0.4898 
Whole-Model Test 

700 ' ' ' ' • ' ' 600 ' ' ' ' ' (/) ' 500 ' ' ! ' ' ' ... ' ' -€ 400 ' ..c: ' ' .~ : 

:::.. ' ' CD 300 ' ' iii ' a: ' ' ' c: • ' 200 ' CD ' 

E ' c .!! 

c: 

100 

w 

0 

-100 

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source 

Model 

Error 

CTotal 

05748B.B02 

DF 

s 

36 

41 

Sum of Squares 

96540.46 

324563.66 

421104.11 

AS-103 

700 

Mean Square 

19308.1 

9015.7 

F Ratio 

2.1416 

Prob>F 

0.0826 
Assemblage Code J 

~ -.... 

€ 

.c: 

Cl) 

;;:: 

-

-c 

Q) 

E 

c: 

• Ci 

.... 

-c 

w 

700~--------------------------~ 

600- • 

5oo400-

300- ,.·" 

• .,.,,*"' 

200- , .. _,,' ,, 

,'' ,' 

,,· . ,' ,, 

~'' . 100- ,.--- _,. ,• 

~~~~~~:::~- --------------------z••••••••••--- 0-,~ ... ,, :J.----·----------.------ .. 

r -· ,,"' 

-1 00 -1~--··-' -,r-----,-.--r---,__,...-.,.., -..,...---,.,---r-----1 

0 50 100 150 200 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

96029.582 2.6629 4 0.0481 

(Least Squares Means ) 

Level Least Sq Mean 

B 15.4530025 

c 167.1744981 

N 5.5713542 

0 21.5852982 

R 9.7468643 

057488.802 AS-104 

Std Error 

36.477o12n 

44.52504367 

27.64570499 

26.07887728 

47.61797260 

Mean 

10.898 

157.830 

8.085 

2s.n9 

7.178 
Entrainment Flow (in cfs) ) 

700~--------------------------~ 

600-

Cl) 500- • 

~ ~ 400-

-E 

.J: 

II) 

s 300-

Q) 

iii • 

a: 200-

c 

CD 

E 

c 

·a; 

... 

-

c 

w 

,_ -~ 100- -~, .. -~ -------------

-- ·;-~'----------~---------- 0- -----·----- _____ .. ___ .!.'.~-:-'!_.. ·-----·---------------------- • -- --,_ ,_ 

---------- ~-~ 

'I--....... -100- • • 

-200 -t-----..,..,---,.--,---,,r---rl---,.--,---1 

-2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 

Entrainment Flow {in cfs) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

4389.0722 0.4868 1 0.4898 

05748B.B02 AS-105 
Regression Analysis 

Response: Entrainment Rate (fish/hr)/kcfs 

(summary of Fit ) 

Rsquare 0.791199 

Root Mean Square Error 9.274219 

Mean of Response 8.869983 

Observations (or Sum Wgts) 8 

(Parameter Estimates ) 

Term Estimate Std Error t Ratio 

Intercept 11.685179 7.41443 1.58 

Assembla(N-0] -4.350896 7.87421 ..0.55 

Usable Storage (in ac..ft) 0.0297343 0.01814 1.64 

Reservoir Width (feet) ..0.00489 0.0033 -1.48 

Reservoir Aush Rate (in days) -8.437519 7.0878 -1.19 

(Effect Test ) 

Source Nparm OF Sum of Squares 

Assemblage Code 1 1 26.26022 

Usable Storage (in ac·lt) 1 1 231.06711 

Reservoir Width (feet) 1 1 189.38281 

Reservoir Aush Rate (in days) 1 1 121.88802 

05748B.B02 AS-106 

Prob>ltl 

0.2131 

0.6191 

0.1997 

0.2345 

0.3195 

F Ratio Prob>F 

0.3053 0.6191 

2.6865 0.1997 

2.2018 0.2345-

1.4171 0.3195 
Whole-Model Test J 

45 

' ' 

I ' • 40- ' ' ' ' ' ' Cl) 35- ' ' ! ' ' ' 

30- ' ~ ' ' ' .... 

.s= ' ' ~ 25- ' ' ' Cll ' ' 

1ii ' ' ' .......... a: 20- . ' ' 

c ' ....... _,.,, 

Cll 

E 15- c:: 

·a; 

... 

c 10-

w ------------ ---------------------------------- . • 

5- . • • 

0 1 .. I I I 

0 10 20 30 40 

Entrainment Rate (fishlhr)lkcfs Predicted 

(Analysis of Variance ) 

Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Ratio 

Model 4 9n.7511 244.438 2.8419 

Error 3 258.0334 86.011 Prob>F 

C Total 7 1235.7845 0.2086 

05748B.B02 A5-107 
Assemblage Code J 

UJ 

-

~ -,._ 

€ 

.r::. 

UJ 

;:: 

-C1) 

(ii 

a: 

40-

30-' ,' ' , ",, ,,' 

'-., ,' ', II ' , '~,, ~'' 

- , 20- ..... ____ ... -

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

. 

, 

, 

, . 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

, 

-c 

(J) 

E 

c 

"iij 

,._ 

'E 

w 

• • 

10-~ • 

• 

o- • ---.. .,., .. - .......... , ... , , ... 

I I . I I I r I I I 

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 

Assemblage Code Leverage 

(Effect Test J 

Sum of Squares F Ratio D F Prob>F 

26.260223 0.3053 1 0.6191 

(Least Squares Means J 

Level Least Sq Mean Std Error Mean 

N 5.60681 083 6.75486198 12.8316 

0 14.30860321 1 0.37 455080 2.2673 

05748B.B02 AS-108 
Usable Storage (in ac-ft) ) 

CD 

ca 

a: 

-

c:: 

CD 

E 

c: 

·c;; 

~ w 

40-

30-

20-

. . . . . 

' . . . . . . 

' . . 

\ 

\ 

. 

. . . I 

I 

. 

' 

. ' 

. • 

I 

. I 

. . . 

: 

. 

. ' 

' ' ' ' \ : . ' ~ .. ,~ . . 

. 10-- ------------- ----------------------------------

-

o- • 

• 

,. 

. . ' ' ' . ' . ' 

I l I I -. l 

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 

Usable Storage (in ac-ft) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares 

231.06711 

F Ratio D F Prob>F 

2.6865 1 0.1997 

Reservoir Width (feet) ) 

~ a: 

'E 

Q) 

E 

c: 

·c;; 

.... 

c: 

w 

10-

o0 

• 

• 

• 

,..,------.... ........... 

. . _ ...... """ .... 

I I I I -1 I 

1 000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 

Reservoir Width (feet) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

05748B.B02 

Sum of Squares 

189.38281 

F Ratio 

2.2018 

AS-109 

DF Prob>F 

1 0.2345 
Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) J . 

I I 

l I 

I , 

I 40- ' I II • I • I I I 

- ' I I' $ I , ' I JZ ' 30- ' ' , 

- I II ' ~ 

.r; ' I 

- I 

.r; ' - I , rJ) I ' ' , 00::: 

- ' ' ' , Q) 20- ' ' Cii . ' I ' 

a: 

-c: 

Q) • 

E 

c: 10-

·n; 

~ ------------------------------------------------ • -

c: 

w - • • 

• 

o- I 

" I . , , ' • "I I I I I 

0 5 10 15 

Reservoir Flush Rate (in days) Leverage 

(Effect Test ) 

Sum of Squares F Ratio OF Prob>F 

121.88802 1.4171 1 0.3195 

05748B.B02 A5-110