alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCMF-12-0000538

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

In the Matter of the

FEBRUARY 2021 EXAMINATION FOR ADMISSION 

TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

NOTICE OF PASSING THE HAWAI#I BAR EXAMINATION

The applicants listed below are hereby notified that each has passed the

February 2021 Hawai#i examination for admission to the Bar of the State of Hawai#i, as

required by Rule 1.3(g)(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i

(RSCH): 

Joseph Blaise Adams

Kenny Young Hyun Baik

Laura Stennis Bearden

Richard Charles Beckett

Aubrey Meredith Matsumi Bento

Georgia Garman Berrenberg

Jeremy David Blank

William Casey Bowen

William Joseph Blaisdell Brennan

Katherine Elinor Bruce

Maria Criselda Calderon

Nicole Chang

Hon-Lum Cheung-Cheng

Alexander Edrenkin

Ilayda Elmas Ossanna

Cleo Brandon Fields 

Cherima Christine Gamatero-Manayan

James Anthony Gosnell

Sierra Lynn Hagg

Roger de Beaumont Hargrave

Jessica Christine Hatcher

Alec Micah Jacobs

Melody Leilani Kaohu

Jason Shawn Kasamoto

Reiko Kato

Camille Tsurue Kiyota

Kelly Ann LaPrade

Gregory James Lau

Joshua Jungho Lee

Hsin-Ya Lin

Michael Chien-Kung Masato Louis

Ian Phillip Luthringer

Jeffrey Scott Lyons

Emil Anthony Macasinag

Janessa Ann Maddox

Tori Reiko-Keonaonaokalikolehua 

 Maeshiro

Patrick Michael McGuirk

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCMF-12-0000538

22-APR-2021

12:06 PM

Dkt. 162 NP
Hannah Ehrig McKee

Makoto Messersmith

JoAnna Marie Nepomuceno Nardulli

Eric M. Nixdorf

Christine Elizabeth Nowland

James Anthony O'Rourke

Melissa Deanna Owens

Marshall Keoni-Pierce Pautsch

Jaime Antonio Rincon

Fransina Tupemeleke Savusa

Joseph Kelly Seipel

Joseph Alan Seltzer

Shay Frances Shibata

Kaela Michiko Shiigi

Chaz Kenichi Shizumura

Aris Bourgeois Capule Springs

Cassandra Lea Stamm

Elise Mayumi Swain

Ian Falefuafua Tapu

Katherine Rae Anna Thomas

Olivia Perras Thompson

Andres E. Tobar

Jacob Troy Tokunaga

Rachel Ayame Uemoto

Jose Alfredo Vega

Craig Kent Vernon

Lauren Keiko Watanabe

Brianna Lee Weaver

Brian Philip Wild

Matthew Paul Woodward

Daniel Bryant Woolston

 

Each applicant is reminded that, until he or she has met all other requirements as

set forth in RSCH Rule 1.3, and has been admitted to practice law by the Supreme

Court of the State of Hawai#i, that applicant may not engage in the practice of law in this

jurisdiction. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 22, 2021. 

BOARD OF EXAMINERS

By: /s/ Evelyn M. Rimando

Its Acting Secretary

2
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip M. Pead, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended March 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in
such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            By: /s/ PHILIP M. PEAD
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Philip M. Pead Chairman,
                                                President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer

Date: March 4, 2005
Before the Third Division,

July 5, 1951

No. 55744.

protests 165209-K, etc. (New York).

#### Mon Fong Wo Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of vegetables, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, and not pickled or packed in salt or brine. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 55731, the claim at 17% percent under paragraph 775, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802) and T. D. 51909, was sustained.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 69

Disapproving the Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative

of 1998.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1999

Mr. BARR of Georgia introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the Legalization of Marijuana for Medical

Treatment Initiative of 1998.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress hereby disapproves of the action of the

4 District of Columbia Council described as follows: The Le5 galization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative

6 of 1998, approved by the electors of the District of Colum7 bia on November 3, 1998, and transmitted to Congress

8 by the Council pursuant to section 602(c) of the District

9 of Columbia Home Rule Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Human Pheromone  Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
William P.  Horgan,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and  Gregory S.
Fredrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William P. Horgan
---------------------
August 8, 2005


/s/ Gregory S. Fredrick
-----------------------
August 8, 2005
No. 51225.

#### Protests 893264-G, etc., of Exporters Service Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

An examination of the record in each instance failing to disclose any error in the action of the collector, the protests were overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 80 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 80

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 1999

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-62 is 
further amended by striking ``November 17, 1999'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting

``November 18, 1999''. Public Law 106-46 is amended by striking 
``November 17, 1999'' and inserting ``November 18, 1999''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101924 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate
Account One on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of Hartford Life and
Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory financial statements as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of our report dated February 21,
2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate Account One
relating to the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of
such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings
"Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
No. 59902.

#### Novelty Veiling Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 280255-K and 278358-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-102
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
(C. D. 881)

#### Shun Ying Chong & Co. *v.*United States

United States Customs Court, Second Division

(Motion granted October 11, 1944)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Before Tilson, Kincheloe, and Lawrence, Judges; Lawrence, J., not participating

Kincheloe, Judge:

Plaintiff having filed a motion for severance of causes of action, and having submitted to this court its reasons therefor, and no special objection to said severance of causes of action being made by attorney for defendant herein in his memorandum in reply to motion of severance, and careful consideration having been • given thereto, it is ordered that the motion be and is hereby granted, and it is further ordered:

(1) That the cause of action which relates to merchandise described in the protest as “oyster sauce” be and it is hereby severed from the remaining claims in the protest.

(2) That upon receipt of this order plaintiff shall immediately file with the clerk of this court two extracts from above-entitled protest, one containing all of that portion of the original protest which sets forth plaintiff’s cause of action in regard to “oyster sauce,” and the other all of that portion of the original protest which consists of the remaining causes of action.

(3) That upon receipt of these extracts the clerk of this court shall attach each one to a separate cover or jacket, shall assign to each the *123original identifying number, and shall add thereto the letter “S” to indicate severance. Also, he shall place with one of these extracts; all of the pertinent documents and shall make appropriate notation of this fact upon the remaining file.

(4) That thereafter plaintiff may proceed separately in regard to the claims contained in each extract and in the- same manner as it. would have been entitled to proceed, under the practice of this court,, had it originally filed separate protests as to each cause of action.

(5) That the granting of this motion for severance of causes of' action is not to be regarded as a precedent for future action of this; court in passing on such motions, but each future motion will be determined upon its merits. By reason of the exigencies of the World! War.and reasons assigned in support of the motion, the court is of the opinion that justice demands that this motion for severance of this protest be granted.
No. 55776.

protest 153511-K (Milwaukee).

#### The Carron Net Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 59893.

#### Nisonger Sales Co. and Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 253062-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that one case, No. 49574, reported by the inspector as not landed, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portion of the merchandise as was reported by the inspector as not landed, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<CIK> 0000878748
<NAME> PolyMedica Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH>                                                                    12768
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              5401
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                434
<INVENTORY>                                                                4409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          23309
<PP&E>                                                                     6171
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             4026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                            72144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                      4424
<BONDS>                                                                   25069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                     86
<OTHER-SE>                                                                42565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                              72144
<SALES>                                                                    7063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                           7103
<CGS>                                                                      2691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                              3319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             33
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                             632
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                         613
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0.07
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

April 4, 1962

No. 66665.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/8848, etc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandisé consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
August 28, 1957

No. 61190.

Suit 4881.

#### United States *v.*Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc.

C. D. 1773 reversed May 7, 1957. C. A. D. 657.
No. 60695.

#### Gatz American Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 278073-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# L_2022160EN.01002801.xml

| 15.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/28

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2022/923

of 11 March 2022

correcting the Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of particular genera or species

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Swedish language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 (2) contains an error in Article 6(3), point (b), as regards the applicable provisions for the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of cereal species. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Swedish language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 (2) contains an error in Article 6(3), point (b), as regards the applicable provisions for the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of cereal species.

| (2) | The Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Does not concern the English language.)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2022.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 150, 14.6.2018, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1189 of 7 May 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the production and marketing of plant reproductive material of organic heterogeneous material of particular genera or species (OJ L 258, 20.7.2021, p. 18).

2

---
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.51    
    


[AspenTechnology Letterhead/Logo]  


June 24,
2003 


Mr. Wayne
Sim

Senior VP Worldwide Sales 


Dear
Wayne: 


I
am pleased to confirm that the Compensation Committee of the AspenTech Board of Directors has approved the following FY04 Executive Compensation Plan for you. This Plan is contingent upon
shareholder approval of the Advent financing transaction, which is currently scheduled for August 2003. 



Your
total target compensation for FY04 will be $336,000, which is comprised of a base salary of $210,000 (this amount has been translated into US dollars based on an approximate exchange
rate—your actual salary is defined in Canadian dollars) and a bonus target of 60%. The actual bonus you earn will be determined by your achievement of FY04 goals. I will communicate the
details of the FY04 bonus program to you in early Q1 once the program has been finalized and approved by the Compensation Committee. 


In
addition, you will be granted options to purchase 681,000 shares of AspenTech common stock at the Fair Market Value on the day the Advent transaction is approved by shareholders. This grant,
together with your existing option holdings, would bring your total equity participation level to approximately 0.750%, based on options with grant prices of $10/share or lower on a
pre-reverse split
basis. In consideration for this substantial new grant, the following condition applies, contingent upon closing of the Advent transaction and issuance of the options: 


	•
	For
your existing stock options with pre-split grant prices of $10/share or lower, you agree to only exercise these options in accordance with their normal
vesting schedule. In the event of your involuntary termination, or a change of control event as redefined in the 2001/2003 stock option plan and described in the proxy statement for the Advent
transaction, this restriction will be lifted. 



Wayne,
I look forward to our continued work together as we drive shareholder value. 



	Best regards,	 	 	 	 
	

/s/ DAVID L. MCQUILLIN	
 	

/s/  WAYNE SIM      	
 	

 
	
	 	
	 	

	David L. McQuillin	 	Wayne Sim	 	Date
	President and CEO

Aspen Technology, Inc.	 	Senior VP Worldwide Sales	 	 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.51
Before the Third Division,

October 15, 1953

No. 57545.

#### Hawaii Liquor Co., Ltd., and Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 115495-K and 116452-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.