alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael R. Cunningham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
                  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
                  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  November 14, 2003

                                                     /s/Michael R. Cunningham
                                                     Michael R. Cunningham
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.14

ENDORSED
STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FILED 04:30 PM 03/14/2001
010128038 - 2988989

                            CERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION

                                       OF

                                 ONEPLACE, LTD.
                                  -------------


        OnePlace, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify the following in accordance with Section 266 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware:

        1. The name of the Corporation is "OnePlace, Ltd." The name of the
Corporation has not changed since it was originally incorporated in the State of
Delaware.

        2. The original Certificate of Incorporation for the Corporation was
filed on January 5, 1999, with the Delaware Secretary of State.

        3. The name of the Delaware limited liability company into which the
Corporation is being converted is "OnePlace, LLC".

        4. The conversion of the Corporation into a Delaware limited liability
company has been approved by the unanimous vote of all of the directors and all
of the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with the provisions of
Section 266 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

        5. This Certificate of Conversion shall become effective on March 9,
2001.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Conversion of OnePlace, Ltd. effective as of March 9, 2001.


                                            OnePlace, Ltd.,
                                            a Delaware corporation


                                            By: /s/ Jonathan L. Block
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Jonathan L. Block,
                                               Vice President
Before the Third Division,

January 8, 1951

No. 55083.

#### Wing Chong Lung et al. *v.*United States,

protests 818361-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 87

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

regulations on the amounts of expenditures of personal funds made

by candidates for election for public office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 2000

Mr. LEACH introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding regulations on the amounts of expenditures of personal funds made by candidates for election

for public office.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 87 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress and the several States may

5 enact laws regulating the amounts of expenditures a can6 didate for elective public office may make from personal

7 funds of the candidate or members of the candidate’s im8 mediate family, including personal loans.’’.

Æ
No. 50293.

#### Protests 70125-K, etc., of Kleinco Importing Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the *215entries. The protests were sustained to this extent. Protest 57853-K, having been abandoned as to entry 66042, was overruled as to that merchandise.
Before Judge Donlon,

July 11, 1966

No. R66/21.

No. R66/22.

#### CAP Sales Corporation *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/18132, etc. (Houston). Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/20642, etc. (Baltimore).

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those in*844volved in *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the canned meat exported from Argentina, during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1959, described on the invoices of the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and as stated in each entry and recited in said schedule “B,” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the' canned meat covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” which with schedule “B,” was attached to and made a part of the decisions.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                         FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Name of Petitioner]Docket No. SA

NOTICE OF PETITION FOR ADJUSTMENT

(                 )

Take notice that on [date filed], [Name of Petitioner] filed pursuant to [applicable section and statute and section of Commission regulations under which the petition is filed and a description of the adjustment requested].

[Include any other information in support of the petition].

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).  Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding.  Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate.  Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.  Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Petitioner.  On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Petitioner.  

The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at http://www.ferc.gov.  Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.    There is an “eSubscription” link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).  For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free).  For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on (insert date).

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.
No. 60369.

protest 271610-K (New York).

#### Artmart Linen Co., Inc., *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of doilies similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58520, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
MDI SUPERFUND SITE 

Houston, Texas

PRE-CERTIFICATION/

FINAL CERTIFICATION 

INSPECTION REPORT

DATE 06/25/08 

SITE CONDITIONS / WEATHER: 

Scattered Clouds, 85degF 

Dry conditions 

PERSONNEL ONSITE: 

Hector De La O 

Rafael Casanova 

Carlos Sanchez 

ACTIVITIES: 

EPA and ENTACT met onsite to perform a pre-final site inspection of 

the MDI Superfund Site. A visual inspection was conducted at each of 

the remedial action locations to verify proper execution, which 

included inspection of each monitoring well, lead and source removal 

excavation areas, foundry sand locations, water impoundments, concrete 

removal areas, and final site topography. It was determined that 

monitoring wells MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 need immediate repairs and all 

monitoring wells are to be re-inspected to ensure proper functionality 

and foundation stability. 

Conclusion: It was determined that all of the soil remediation areas 

were properly executed and have no outstanding problems; therefore 

this inspection can serve as the final site inspection. Specifically, 

those items requiring inspection and repairs are listed below as punch 

list items. 

Punch List Items Requiring Inspection and Repairs

• Inspect all monitoring wells for erosion of soils around 

foundation pads preventing stability and to ensure that proper 

drainage slopes are established to prevent surface run-off from 

entering the wells through the well casings. 

• Inspect all monitoring well locking devices and all other well 

components to ensure proper functionality. 

Name Title Signature Date 

Hector De La O Project Engineer 06/25/07
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      annual report of Affinity Media International Corp. fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Affinity Media International
      Corp.


Date: April 12, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Peter
              H.
              EngelPeter
                H. EngelChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Media International Corp. and
      will
      be retained by Affinity Media International Corp. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 59903.

#### Bemo Shipping Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 281568-K (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A, D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32% percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.
No. 66672.

#### Union Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/26771, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of deeharaeterized horsemeat, fresh, chilled, or frozen, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66254, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
20.

EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned herby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on form 10-Q, that:

o    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

o    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the company's financial condition and results of operation.



/s/ Linda L. Engle
------------------------------------
Linda L. Engle, Executive VP & CFO


Dated: May 10, 2005
       -----------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM (Identify specific financial statements) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    116,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,857
<PP&E>                                          10,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           167
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,353
<SALES>                                         66,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,720
<CGS>                                           45,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (7)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,545
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,631
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 95

  Expressing the sense of Congress that State earnings limitations on 
  retired law enforcement officers be lifted to enhance school safety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 1999

 Mr. Sweeney submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that State earnings limitations on 
  retired law enforcement officers be lifted to enhance school safety.

Whereas school violence in the United States is a growing concern of all 
        Americans;
Whereas our schools should be a safe haven for the pursuit of the education our 
        children will need to succeed in life, rather than places of fear and 
        violence;
Whereas Government has an obligation to provide parents, children, and 
        communities with the resources necessary to prevent school violence;
Whereas a comprehensive program to prevent school violence should include an 
        increase in the day-to-day presence of security officers in schools;
Whereas police officers who have daily risked their lives to provide for the 
        safety of the general public are willing to continue to serve even after 
        retirement; and
Whereas several States have placed earnings limits on retired police officers 
        which needlessly restrict those retired officers' involvement in 
        providing for safer schools: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that States should be encouraged to 
lift earnings limitations on retired State law enforcement officers in 
order to enhance public safety and increase the day-to-day security in 
our schools.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
                                 Statement Re:
                    Computation of Per share Earnings (Loss)




<CAPTION>
                                              Three months ended September 30,     Nine months ended September 30,
                                              --------------------------------     -------------------------------
                                                   1996             1995                   1996             1995
                                                -----------      ----------          -----------       ----------- 
<S>                                             <C>              <C>                  <C>               <C>      
Primary
  Average shares outstanding                     10,007,454       9,853,439            9,947,653         9,852,467
  Net effect of dilutive stock options-based
    on the treasury stock method using  
    average market price                            616,642             --               512,251               --
                                                -----------      ----------          -----------       ----------- 
  Total                                          10,624,096       9,853,439           10,459,904         9,852,467
                                                                                                        
  Net income (loss)                             $   234,308      $ (341,715)         $   393,922       $(1,234,217)
                                                ===========      ==========          ===========       ===========

  Per share amount                              $      0.02      $    (0.03)         $      0.04       $     (0.13)
                                                ===========      ==========          ===========       ===========
Fully Diluted                                                                                           
  Average shares outstanding                     10,007,454       9,853,439            9,947,653         9,852,467
  Net effect of dilutive stock options-based
    on the treasury stock method using the
    period-end market price if higher than
    average market price                            616,642             --               553,377               --
                                                -----------      ----------          -----------       ----------- 
 Total                                           10,624,096       9,853,439           10,501,030         9,852,467

  Net income (loss)                             $   234,308      $ (341,715)         $   393,922       $(1,234,217)
                                                ===========      ==========          ===========       ===========

  Per share amount                              $      0.02      $    (0.03)         $      0.04       $     (0.13)
                                                ===========      ==========          ===========       ===========
</TABLE>