alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          38,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,699
<PP&E>                                          37,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,560
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           909
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,276)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,772
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,001
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               292,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (59,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (502)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (59,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     544
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (58,694)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.71)


</TABLE>
steam_record - Re: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION - PLANT ID 09166 - MILTON R. YOUNG 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date. 

Sincerely, 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: Craig Bleth <cbleth@minnkota.com>

Date: 7/9/2010 12:14 PM

Subject: Re: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION - PLANT ID 09166 - MILTON R. YOUNG

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3712B5DO... 8/24/2011
No. 59926.

#### Samuel Barotz & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petitions 7179-R and 7181-R (New York).

Ekwall, Judge:

These cases, which were consolidated for trial, consist of petitions for remission of additional duties assessed by reason of the fact that the final appraised values of certain Japanese merchandise, entered at the port of New York, exceeded the values declared on entry. (Section 489, Tariff Act of 1930.) The merchandise consists of imitation pearls and beads. It appears that appeals for reappraisement were filed which, insofar as they pertained to the *per se*value of the merchandise, were abandoned, due to the fact that after the war it was impossible to obtain evidence.

Petitioner, in support of its claim for remission herein, introduced the testimony of the president of the importing corporation. His testimony may be summarized as follows: He had been an importer of beads and novelties from various countries, including Japan, for about 25 years. His corporation employed the services of four commissionaires in checking prices. Price lists were received from these commissionaires about every week, and he was in constant touch with the market. In the case of the instant importations, he was convinced that the invoice prices were correct and instructed his customhouse broker to enter at those prices. He also conferred with the customs officials as to the prices. However, the appraiser did not agree with him, and he decided to litigate the matter. The market in Japan was fluctuating at that time, but the trend was downward, due to the fact that the Japanese were trying to obtain all the United States dollars possible. He also discussed the prices with other importers of similar goods, and they agreed with him as to the prices. Appeals for reappraisement were filed and were partially won, insofar as the item of commission was concerned. As to the *per se*value, no evidence could be obtained, due to the war conditions. Subsequent to the war, nothing could be done, due to the death of the particular commissionaire involved and to the fact that some of the others were out of business and, as to the one who remained in business, his office had been destroyed. Therefore, petitioner instructed his attorneys to abandon the reappraisement appeals as to the *per se*value.

The witness further testified that he at no time concealed any of the facts from the appraiser or any Government officer, nor did he misrepresent any of the facts bearing on the case nor intend to defraud the revenue of the United States.

Government counsel stated at the conclusion of this witness’ testimony that “all information and advice which has come to the office of the Assistant Attorney General with respect to these matters is highly favorable to the importer.”

*436Upon this record, we find that petitioner has produced satisfactory evidence that the entry of the merchandise at values lower than the appraised values was without intention to defraud the Government or deceive its officials. The petitions are, therefore, granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33






                             Harris Interactive Inc.
                               130 Corporate Woods
                            Rochester, New York 14624


Albert Angrisani
5 Independence Way
Princeton, New Jersey  08543


Dear Mr. Angrisani:

     Please reference the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of
August 5, 2001 between you and Harris Interactive Inc. (the "Company"). Section
3.1 of the Agreement provides for payment to you of Base Compensation, the
amount of which is to be reviewed periodically by the Compensation Committee of
the Company's Board of Directors.

     We hereby advise you that the Compensation Committee has reviewed your Base
Compensation, and has approved an increase in such Base Compensation to $375,000
per annum, effective July 1, 2003.




     /s/ James A. Riedman
     ----------------------------
James A. Riedman
Chairman
Compensation Committee


















                                       1
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belair Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

     (a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
          September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  the  results  of
          operations of the Fund for such period.


Dated:  November 14, 2002


                                                    /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Michelle A. Alexander
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Gary J. Bench, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of CNX Gas Corporation. (the “Registrant”), certify that to myknowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, of the Registrant (the “Report”): 

 

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

Date: February 21, 2006
**Exhibit 99.1**

----

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Genesys S.A., a French *société**anonyme* (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s  knowledge that:
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated May 15, 2003
   By:    /s/      FRANÇOIS LEGROS                François      Legros     Chairman and Chief Executive      Officer 
Dated May 15, 2003
   By:   /s/      MICHAEL SAVAGE                 Michael Savage    Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genesys S.A. and will be retained by Genesys S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 61174.

protests 272864-K, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk wearing apparel similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification
Re:  Asset Backed Securities Corporation
Home Equity Loan Trust Series 2005-HE7 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE7

I, Gregory P. Richter, certify that:
1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form  10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust Series 2005-HE7 (the "Trust");
2.

Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
3.

Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be prepared by the Trustee based upon the servicing information required to be provided by the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement is included in these reports;
4.

Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statements included in the report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and based upon the review required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in the report, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and
5.

The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based, in each case, upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar standard as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: the Servicer and the Trustee.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, dated July 1, 2005 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among Asset Backed Securities Corporation, as depositor (the "Depositor"), DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., as seller (the "Seller"),  Centex Home Equity Company, LLC, as servicer (the "Servicer"), MortgageRamp, Inc., as loan performance advisor (the "Loan Performance Advisor") and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee").
/s/ Gregory P. Richter

Gregory P. Richter
Vice President March 7, 2006
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Brian Fiddler, of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: May 24, 2012

|BrianFiddler                                                       | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Brian Fiddler                                                        | 
|Chief Financial Officer                                              | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer) | 

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRETT HARDING, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No.08-22-00117-CR

Appeal from the

42nd District Court

of Taylor County, Texas 

(TC# 28762A)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s second motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until January 30, 2023. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James Hicks, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 30, 2023

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17

th day of January, 2023.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
No. 68626.

protest 63/12743 (New York).

#### I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
JOHN B. CROUSE v. TAMARA S. COX

(AC 38462)

Sheldon, Beach and Harper, Js.

Submitted on briefs May 23—officially released July 4, 2017

Procedural History

Action to recover damages for fraud, and for other

relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk, where the court, Hon. Taggart D. Adams, judge trial referee, granted the

defendant’s motion to dismiss and rendered judgment

thereon; subsequently, the court denied the plaintiff’s

motion to reargue, and the plaintiff appealed to this

court. Vacated; further proceedings.

John B. Crouse, self-represented, the appellant

(plaintiff) filed a brief.
Opinion

PER CURIAM. The judgment of dismissal is vacated.

The case is remanded for further proceedings, without

prejudice to the filing of a motion for summary

judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAIME VILLA, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00047-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20110D05357)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until September 9, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 9, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13

th day of August, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
National Advisory Council for 

Environmental Policy and Technology 

Meeting Agenda 

May 25-26, 2010 

Sheraton Crystal City Hotel 

1800 Jefferson Davis Highway 

Arlington, VA 22202 

(703) 486-1111 

Ballroom B 

Tuesday, May 25, 2010 

8:00	 Registration 

8:30	 Welcoming Remarks and Introductions 

• Sonia Altieri 

NACEPT Designated Federal Officer 

• Rafael DeLeon 

Director, EPA Office of Cooperative Environmental Management 

• Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.


NACEPT Chair


9:00	 Opening Remarks from EPA’s General Counsel 

• Scott Fulton 

9:30	 EPA’s 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Approach 

• Barbara J. Bennett


EPA’s Chief Financial Officer


10:00	 BREAK 

10:15	 Overview of NACEPT Subcommittee on Promoting Environmental 

Stewardship (SPES) Recommendations 

• Lee Paddock and David Paylor


Subcommittee Co-Chairs


• Jennifer Nash


NACEPT Subcommittee Liaison


11:15	 Public Comments 
11:45	 Discussion and Approval of NACEPT Subcommittee on Promoting 

Environmental Stewardship (SPES) Recommendations 

• Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.


NACEPT Chair


12:15	 LUNCH 

1:30	 Integrating Environmental Justice into Rulemaking 

• Lisa Heinzerling 

Associate Administrator 

EPA’s Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation (OPEI) 

2:00	 Environmental Justice and Vulnerable Populations 

• Lisa F. Garcia


Senior Advisor to the Administrator


for Environmental Justice


2:30	 Overview of EPA’s Symposium on the Science of Disproportionate 

Environmental Health Impacts 

• Onyemaechi Nweke 

Physical Scientist, Office of Environmental Justice 

EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) 

3:30	 BREAK 

3:45	 Overview of Emerging Technologies and Vulnerable Populations Charge 

• Fred Hauchman 

Director, Office of Science Policy 

EPA’s Office of Research and Development (ORD) 

4:45	 Discussion on Vulnerable Populations 

• Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.


NACEPT Chair


5:30	 Public Comments 

6:00	 ADJOURN 
Wednesday, May 26, 2010 

8:30 Overview of EPA’s Workforce Issues 

• Bob Perciasepe


EPA Deputy Administrator


9:15 Overview of Workforce Issues Charge 

• Susan B. Hazen 

Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator 

Office of Administration & Resources Management (OARM) 

• Raul Soto 

Associate Assistant Administrator 

Outreach, Diversity & Collaboration 

Office of Administration & Resources Management (OARM) 

10:45 BREAK 

11:00 Discussion on Workforce Issues 

• Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.


NACEPT Chair


1:00 Wrap Up and Next Steps 

1:30 Public Comments 

2:00 ADJOURN
Before the Second Division,

January 14, 1948

No. 52110.

petition 6205-R (San Juan).

#### Fajardo Sugar Co. of Porto Rico *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From an examination of the record the court was satisfied that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that returned upon final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 62948.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/8818, 58/9203, and 58/9633 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

April 6, 1959

No. 62945.

#### Arnold Hoffman & Co., Incorporated *v.*United States,

protests 289646-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of acrylic resin, made into partly finished articles, similar *342in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *J. B. Henriques, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 C.C.P.A. 54, C.A.D. 695), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                          18,634
<SECURITIES>                                     5,008
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (977)
<INVENTORY>                                     24,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,367
<PP&E>                                          80,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,467
<BONDS>                                         36,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,235
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,817
<SALES>                                        152,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,621
<CGS>                                          137,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (6)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (379)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (884)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.23)



</TABLE>