alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Guidance Principles on 

Clean Power Plan Modeling

Docket No. AD16-14-000

ERRATA NOTICE

(January 20, 2016)

On January 19, 2016, the Commission issued a staff white paper on Guidance 

Principles for Clean Power Plan Modeling. This errata notice serves to correct the 

omission of certain text in the paper as issued, and to make other corrections, as follows:

1. The third paragraph should be revised to include new text after the first sentence, 

so that the paragraph states as follows:

This white paper identifies four guiding principles that may assist 

transmission planning entities, which may include regional 

transmission organizations (RTOs), independent system operators 

(ISOs), electric utilities, or other interested stakeholders, in 

conducting effective analysis of the CPP and associated state plans, 

federal plans or multi-state plans (compliance plans). The North 

American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) and the regional 

electric reliability organizations may also benefit from following 

these guiding principles as they perform CPP-related analyses. 

These guiding principles address four areas: (1) transparency and 

stakeholder engagement; (2) study methodology and interactions 

between studies; (3) study inputs, sensitivities and probabilistic 

analysis; and (4) tools and techniques.

2. The citation in footnote 1 should be revised as follows:

1 See Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, 80 Fed. Reg. 64,662 Docket No. 

EPA HQ OAR 2013-0602, at 1104(2015) (CPP).

3. The citation in footnote 3 should read “Id. at 64,671.”

4. The citation in footnote 6 should read “CPP at 64,671.”

5. A new footnote 10 should be added to the end of the second sentence under 

heading III. Purpose of White Paper, with the following text: “We note, however, 
that the EPA has determined that Vermont is not required to submit a compliance 

plan.” 

For ease of reference, a clean, revised copy of the white paper is also being filed in 

the above-captioned docket.
No. 62404.

#### Glensder Textile Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 288444-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

August 12, 1946

No. 51266.

#### Protests 97663-K, etc., of F. W. Myers & Co. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue in this case is the same as that in the case of *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 C. C. P. A. 81, C. A. D. 319). The claim of the plaintiff to the effect that no duty should have been assessed was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 23(b)

                           [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LOGO]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
included in this registration statement and to the incorporation by reference
in this registration statement of our report dated January 22, 1999 included in
Three-Five Systems, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.

                                                  /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Phoenix, Arizona,
   August 25, 1999.
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belair Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
     30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Date:  August 14, 2003

                                /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                -----------------------
                                Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 72929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28934]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

[MMAA 104000]

Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale (NOS) for 
Eastern Gulf of Mexico Planning Area (EPA) Outer Continental Shelf 
(OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 225 (EPA Sale 225)

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of EPA Sale 225.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BOEM announces the availability of the Proposed NOS for 
proposed EPA Sale 225. This Notice is published pursuant to 30 CFR 
556.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. With regard to oil 
and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to 
section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides affected States the 
opportunity to review the Proposed NOS. The Proposed NOS sets forth the 
proposed terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, 
royalty rates, and rental rates.

DATES: Affected States may comment on the size, timing, and location of 
proposed EPA Sale 225 within 60 days following their receipt of the 
Proposed NOS. The Final NOS will be published in the Federal Register 
at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening 
currently is scheduled for March 19, 2014.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed NOS for EPA Sale 225 and a 
``Proposed Notice of Sale Package'' containing information essential to 
potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, 
Gulf of Mexico Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1201 Elmwood 
Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 
736-2519.
    Agency Contact: Julie Conklin, Sale Coordination Branch Chief, 
Julie.Conklin@boem.gov.

    Dated: November 15, 2013.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2013-28934 Filed 12-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
[No. 14252.

Department Two.

February 18, 1918.]

#### Henry Nelson, *Respondent,*v. Washington Water Power Company, Appellant.1

Appeal—Review—New Trial—Discretion. Tbe discretion of tbe trial court in granting a new trial for insufficiency of tbe evidence will not be disturbed on appeal except for abuse of discretion.

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered March 5, 1917, granting a new trial, after sustaining a motion for nonsuit, in an action for personal injuries sustained through collision with a street car.

Affirmed.

*Post, Russell, Carey & Higgins,*for appellant.

*Losey & Newton,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 169 Pac. 896.

Chadwick, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision between one of defendant’s street cars and a wagon driven by plaintiff. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial judge sustained a motion for a nonsuit. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, and the trial judge, being of the opinion that the motion for a nonsuit should have been denied, entered an order granting a new trial. Prom this order, defendant has appealed.

We cannot say, as a matter of law, that there is no evidence, or presumption, or inference arising out of the evidence, tending to show that the negligence of the defendant was not the proximate cause of the accident. In matters of this kind, it is the duty of the trial judge to pass upon the weight and sufficiency of the evidence. It is the settled rule of this court, established by an unbroken line of decisions, that we will not interfere unless there -appears to have been a plain abuse of discre*340tion. See *Funk v. Horrocks,*99 Wash. 397, 169 Pac. 805, and cases therein cited.

From a careful reading of the record, we are satisfied that there was no such abuse. As no evidence was introduced by the defendant, we cannot tell what the issues may be on a new trial, and therefore refrain from a discussion of the facts. As the case now stands, such discussion would be of no benefit and might confuse the issues.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., Mount, and Holcomb, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORAMTION
EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL SATEMENTS FOR THE 
FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,503
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,510)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,510)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
No. 54507.

#### Rev. Father Joseph Kelly, B. A., Pastor of the Holy Saviour Catholic Church *v.*United States,

protest 148379-K (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# [PROTECTIVE LIFE AND
ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

# EXHIBIT 32(a)

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne E. Stuenkel, President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Wayne E. Stuenkel President(Principal Executive
Officer) August 16, 2004

This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SM&A (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Cathy McCarthy, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steve D. Handy, Senior VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 7, 2007 |   | /s/ CATHY McCARTHY                                            |   |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Cathy McCarthy                                                |
|                    |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer                        |
|                    |   |                                                          |
|                    |   |                                                          |
| Dated: November 7, 2007 |   | /s/ STEVE D. HANDY                                            |   |
|                    |   | Steve D. Handy                                                |
|                    |   | Senior Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

----
No. 57149.

protest 187379-K (New York).

#### Air Clearance Ass’n, Inc. *v.*United States,

*378Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 61692.

#### Richter Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 310348-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fried herring similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Richter Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 128, C. A. D. 649), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65367.

#### Kane Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 287096-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit: 10.3T


SECURITY INTEREST AGREEMENT (#3)                                  August 5, 1991

WHEREAS the Trudy Corp of 165 Water Street in Norwalk, Ct. (hereafter "Trudy")
is seeking to open additional letters of credit in the Orient to import new
merchandise for confirmed and pending orders, and

WHEREAS the Trudy Corp needs additional cash collateral to provide to Union
Trust as a condition for opening the Letters of Credit, and has to date been
unable to secure financing from other sources, and

WHEREAS William W. Burnham (hereafter "Burnham") of White Oak Shade Road in New
Canaan, Ct. is willing to assist Trudy Corp by hypothecating and assigning his
personal Investment Savings Account at Union Trust (A/C #350328639 for
$24,140.00 as of 8/5/91) as the necessary collateral for Trudy Corp to effect
the opening of the Letters of Credit (L/C #1001437 with separate drawings of
$12,960.00 for T.E. Squirrels, and for $11,180.00 for Wolves),

NOW THEREFORE, Trudy Corp agrees to provide a security interest to Burnham in
recognition of the value he is providing the Company and the risks inherent
therein. Given that this collateral is necessary for the Company to obtain
needed product to survive, that collateral has great value to Trudy, in excess
of the stated value of the merchandise imported.

Trudy agrees to give Burnham a collateral interest in all Cash or Securities,
all Accounts Receivable both of Trudy and its subsidiary, Soundprints, all
inventory of whatever kind, and all furniture and fixtures. This security
interest shall be limited to the amount of the Letter of Credit referred to
above, plus imputed interest of 12% per annum.

Burnham shall be entitled to perfect his security interest, if and when, Trudy
is unable to pay Union Trust on maturity of the Letter of Credit and the Bank
takes possession of the collateral. In such circumstances, Burnham shall have a
collateral interest second only to that of Union Trust (if any), but in any
event senior to all trade creditors and to all other liabilities of the Company
unless otherwise stated or stipulated by legislation.

Both parties agree that there may be partial reductions under this agreement as
goods are imported and paid for by Trudy; the collateral interest shall be
reduced pro rata.

AGREED:  /s/ Peter P. Ogilvie                  ACCEPTED:  /s/ William W. Burnham
         ----------------------                           ----------------------
         Peter P. Ogilvie                                 William W. Burnham
         for Trudy Corp 9/8/91
Case No. 8,322.

#### LEWIS v. ESTHER.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 423.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term, 1823.

Contracts — Failure to Complete — Riqht to Recover por Work Done.

If a man contract to do certain work at a certain price, and quits it before it is finished, he cannot recover, upon a quantum meruit, the value of his labor.

The plaintiff [Samuel Lewis] agreed to do certain work for the defendant [Robert Esther] for the sum of $125. He began, but abandoned it before it was finished, and now sued for quantum meruit, and offered to prove the value of his work.

Mr. Jones, for defendant,

objected that there was an express, specific agreement at a certain price, and therefore the plaintiff could not recover upon an implied assumpsit.

Mr. Ashton, contra,

contended that, by usage, money is due as the work progresses, otherwise a poor mechanic cannot go on.

But

THE COURT

(nem. con.) rejected the evidence, and instructed the jury that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in this action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         46,249
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,301
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65,872
<PP&E>                                         176,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          79,652
<BONDS>                                        281,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,280
<OTHER-SE>                                     (132,298)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,364
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,179
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  77,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               48,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,451)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (20,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.20)


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 101

To amend the Sherman Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act with

respect to commerce with foreign nations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. CONYERS (for himself and Mr. DINGELL) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition

to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Sherman Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act with respect to commerce with foreign nations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect American Jobs

5 Through the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements

6 Amendments Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 101 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

2 (a) AMENDMENT TO THE SHERMAN ACT.—Section 7

3 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 6a) is amended by striking

4 the period at the end and inserting the following:

5 ‘‘and without regard to effect of such conduct on consum6 ers in the United States. A determination of whether the

7 effect of such conduct is substantial may be made solely

8 with reference to the product or type of product affected

9 by the conduct and the geographical area in which the con10 duct occurs.’’.

11 (b) AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMIS12 SION ACT.—Section 5(a)(3) of the Federal Trade Com13 mission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(3)) is amended by striking

14 the period at the end and inserting the following:

15 ‘‘and without regard to effect of such methods of competi16 tion on consumers in the United States. A determination

17 of whether the effect of methods of competition are sub18 stantial may be made solely with reference to the product

19 or type of product affected by such methods of competition

20 and the geographical area in which such methods of com21 petition occurs.’’.

Æ