alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 51265.

#### Protests 109219-K, etc., of Engis Equipment Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence established that the articles were similar in all material respects to the clinometers passed upon in *Engis Equipment Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(16 Cust. Ct. 86, C. D. 990). In accordance therewith the claim for classification as mathematical instruments at 40 percent' under paragraph 360 was sustained.
### Re: Revised SIP call draft Raj Rao to: Raj Rao 08/06/2010 05:51 PM Cc: Anna Wood, "Kymn, Christine J.", Howard Hoffman, Lisa Sutton, Paul Balserak Hi Christine, Sorry for the delay, but here are the FIP final draft (clean and Redline versions comparing to your RL draft).

Reg Polls_PSD FIP prop_8-6-2010.doc PSD FIP prop_redline_8-6_to_8-4-from-OMB.doc Thanks for letting me know that the IAG only had a few minor tweaks and that you were waiting to check in with the requesting agency and will send us the edits asap. We certainly hope these packages can be cleared early Monday morning. Thanks for all your help and patience, Raj

Raj Rao, P.E. Group Leader, NSRG OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709 919-541-5344 919-541-5509 fax Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative and Confidential. Raj Rao 08/06/2010 04:01:44 PM Hi Christine, Attached is our latest draft of the SI...
From: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_ J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lisa Sutton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/06/2010 04:01 PM Subject: Revised SIP call draft Hi Christine, Attached is our latest draft of the SIP call file incorporating many of OMB's edits. This also includes the agreed upon biogenic language and the additional SIP Fix write-up language that I also sent you separately. I am also attaching a Compare with your Redline document and hope it is easy to track the changes. Unfortunately we ran out of time, to do a crosswalk of changes but i hope the compare document will help speed up review.Please note that EPA is also doing a concurrent last -minute review of this final draft but we wanted to get this to you asap. The FIP rule will follow shortly .

GHG SIP Call Proposal_8-6-2010.doc SIP call_redline_8-6_to_8-5-fromOMB.doc Thanks so much for your patience and help. Please let me know if you want to have a call. raj Raj Rao, P.E. Group Leader, NSRG OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709 919-541-5344 919-541-5509 fax Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative and Confidential.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,378)
<INVENTORY>                                    155,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,113
<PP&E>                                         281,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,175,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          250,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,044
<OTHER-SE>                                     389,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,175,375
<SALES>                                      1,524,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,524,517
<CGS>                                          787,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,340,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                160,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57,961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 63994.

protests 59/15337, etc. (New York).

#### Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co., Inc. (S. Stern Henry *&*Co.) *v.*United States,

*400Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Pollak Industrial Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 251, C.D. 1991), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 128

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking

4 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘Decem5 ber 11, 2000’’.

Æ
No. 53879.

#### Koven Bros. *v.*United States,

protest 152169-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended January 31, 2005, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:  
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January
31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc. This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a part of the Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Dated: March 9, 2005 /s/ KENNETH C. BUDDEKenneth C. BuddePresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 68
EXHIBIT
23.3
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We have
issued our reports dated March 3, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, financial statement schedule, and internal control over
financial reporting of Cenveo, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the Annual
Report of Cenveo, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, which
are incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement.  We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of the
aforementioned reports and to the use of our name as it appears under the
caption “Experts.”
 
 /s/ Grant Thornton
LLP
 Melville,
New York
 March 3,
2010
77894.

#### HOWE v. ROBERTS et al.

(392 SE2d 577)

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellant-plaintiff filed a breach of warranty suit in magistrate court. The suit was filed against appellee-defendant William Douglas Roberts, who is the president of appellee-defendant William Douglas Roberts & Associates, Inc. (Corporation). After the statute of limitation had run, appellant amended his pleadings to add the Corporation as a party-defendant to the proceedings. The magistrate court ultimately found in favor of appellant as against the Corporation, but it dismissed the action as against Roberts. After a de novo appeal to the state court, appellees filed a *Yost*counterclaim for abusive litigation. The state court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees as to appellant’s breach of warranty claim and denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the Yosú counterclaim. In *Howe v. Roberts,*191 Ga. App. 143 (381 SE2d 117) (1989), we affirmed these rulings.

On certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Corporation and affirmed our affirmance of the denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss the *Yost*counterclaim. *Howe v. Roberts,*259 Ga. 617 (385 SE2d 276) (1989). Therefore, our judgment is vacated and the decision of the Supreme Court is adopted as the judgment of this court. The grant of summary judgment in favor of the Corporation is reversed. The grant of summary judgment in favor of Roberts is unaffected by the Supreme Court’s decision and we adhere to our original affirmance of that ruling. The denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss the *Yost*counter*528claim is affirmed.

Decided February 14, 1990.

*Lawson & Davis, Lela L. Smith,*for appellant.

*William R. L. Watson,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*Deen, P. J., McMurray, P. J., Banke, P. J., Birdsong, Sognier, Pope, Beasley and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
### NUMBER 13
- 15
- 00 562
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ABBASID, INC. D/B/A AZHAR ’ S ORIENTAL RUGS, PHOENICIAN IMPORTS, INC., AND AZHAR SAID, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A ABBASID, INC. AND PHOENICIAN IMPORTS, INC. , A ppellants ,

v. DALE & KLEIN, LLP , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 370 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez

Defendants and counter

- plaintiffs Abbasid, Inc. d/b/a Azhar ’ s Oriental Rugs,
Phoenician Imports, Inc., and Azhar Said, i ndividually and d/b/a Abbasid, Inc. and Phoenician Imports, Inc. , and plaintiff and counter

- defendant Dale & Klein LLP have each2

appealed a final judgment rendered on September 11, 2015. This Court previously abated the appeal to allow the parties to effectuate their settlement agreement. The parties have now filed an agreed, joint motion for disposition pursuant to settlement
agr eement. The parties assert that this case is now ripe for disposition pursuant to the agreement, and ask us to render judgment effectuating the ir settlement. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 42.1 (a) (2)(A). T
T he Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion for disposition pursuant to settlement agreement, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See id. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this appeal. We GRANT the joint motion for disposition pursuant to settlement agreement. In accordanc e with the settlement agreement, w e set aside and REVERSE the final judgment and RENDER judgment d ismissing the parties ’ claims against each other with prejudice. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See
id. R. 42.1(d) ( “ Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant. ” ). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties ’ reques t, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. We dismiss any other pending
motions as moot.

ROGELIO VALDEZ Chief Justice
Delivered and filed t h e 11 th day of January , 201 8

.
# L_2022301EN.01002101.xml

| 22.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 301/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 301/21

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/2281

of 15 November 2022

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Lumblija’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Lumblija’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Lumblija’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lumblija’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lumblija’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Lumblija’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.3. – Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 November 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 286, 27.7.2022, p. 57.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report of Li3 Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luis Saenz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Luis SaenzName:
Luis SaenzTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
January 6, 2012
H. R. 1094

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to broaden the range of discount window loans

which may be used as collateral for Federal reserve notes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the

third sentence of the second undesignated paragraph of section

16 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 412) is amended by

striking ‘‘acceptances acquired under the provisions of section 13

of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘acceptances acquired under section 10A,

10B, 13, or 13A of this Act’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Steven S. Myers, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SM&A;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.]c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Dated: October 22, 2004
    
    /s/ STEVEN S. MYERSSteven S. MyersChairman and Chief Executive Officer
 25
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ASHLEY BONAIR CHAMBERS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30116

D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00077-RMP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2016** 

Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Ashley Bonair Chambers appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 30-month sentence for bank fraud, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344; wire fraud affecting a financial institution, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; and conspiracy to commit bank fraud and wire fraud

FILED

JUN 02 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
affecting a financial institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Chambers contends that the district court erred by refusing to instruct the

jury to determine the amount of loss resulting from each of his convictions. We

review de novo. See United States v. Cortes, 757 F.3d 850, 857 (9th Cir. 2014). 

Because the loss amount calculations affected neither the statutory maximum nor

any mandatory minimum sentence applicable to Chambers’s convictions, the

district court was not required to submit them to the jury. See United States v.

Vallejos, 742 F.3d 902, 906-07 (9th Cir. 2014). The district court appropriately

exercised its discretion to determine the loss amount during sentencing, pursuant to

the advisory Guidelines. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 233 (2005). 

Chambers’s second motion for reconsideration of the court’s order declining

to entertain his pro se motion to intervene is denied. The arguments contained in

Chambers’s pro se motions filed on January 13, 2016, and February 4, 2016, have

been considered and do not change the result in this case. 

AFFIRMED.

2 15-30116
Presidential Documents

74327 

Federal Register 

Vol. 88, No. 209 

Tuesday, October 31, 2023 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 10658 of October 26, 2023 

Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy in Lewiston, Maine 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless acts of violence 

perpetrated on October 25, 2023, in Lewiston, Maine, by the authority vested 

in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws 

of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United 

States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public 

buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on 

all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia 

and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until 

sunset, October 30, 2023. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at halfstaff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, 

consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities 

and naval vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth 

day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-three, and 

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred 

and forty-eighth. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24104 

Filed 10–30–23; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC0BIDEN.EPS</GPH>