alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1002

To amend the Act popularly known as the Declaration of Taking Act to

require that all condemnations of property by the Government proceed

under that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1999

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mrs.

BONO, Mr. METCALF, Mr. POMBO, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. CALVERT, Mr.

GARY MILLER of California, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. ISTOOK, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Act popularly known as the Declaration of

Taking Act to require that all condemnations of property

by the Government proceed under that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prompt Compensation

5 Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1002 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONDEMNATIONS REQUIRED TO PROCEED UNDER

2 THE DECLARATION OF TAKING ACT.

3 The first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to expe4 dite the construction of public buildings and works outside

5 the District of Columbia by enabling possession and title

6 of sites to be taken in advance of final judgment in pro7 ceedings for the acquisition thereof under the power of

8 eminent domain’’, approved February 26, 1931 (Chapter

9 307; 40 U.S.C. 258a), popularly known as the Declaration

10 of Taking Act, is amended—

11 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘the peti12 tioner may file in the cause, with the petition or at

13 any time before judgment,’’ and inserting ‘‘the peti14 tioner shall file in the cause, by not later than 90

15 days after the filing of the petition,’’;

16 (2) in the second full paragraph, by striking

17 ‘‘Upon the filing of said declaration’’ and all that

18 follows through ‘‘shall vest in the United States of

19 America’’ and inserting ‘‘Upon filing the declaration

20 of taking, the petitioner shall deposit with the court

21 the amount of the estimated compensation stated in

22 the declaration. Upon such filing and deposit, title

23 to the lands in fee simple absolute, or such less es24 tate or interest therein as specified in the declara25 tion, shall vest in the United States’’; and
3

•HR 1002 IH

1 (3) in the third full paragraph, by striking ‘‘the

2 court may order that the money deposited’’ and

3 inserting ‘‘the court shall order that the money

4 deposited’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1052 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1052

To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to civil penalties for 
                   unruly passengers of air carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1999

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to civil penalties for 
                   unruly passengers of air carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PENALTIES FOR UNRULY PASSENGERS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 463 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 46317. Interference with cabin or flight crew
    ``(a) General Rule.--An individual who interferes with the duties 
or responsibilities of the flight crew or cabin crew of a civil 
aircraft or takes any action that poses an imminent threat to the 
safety of the aircraft or other individuals on the aircraft is liable 
to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than 
$25,000. In addition or as an alternative, the Secretary of 
Transportation may prohibit for not more than 1 year the individual 
from flying as a passenger on an aircraft used to provide air 
transportation.
    ``(b) Notification of Air Carriers.--Not later than 10 days after 
issuing an order prohibiting an individual from flying under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall notify all air carriers of the prohibition and 
the term of such prohibition.
    ``(c) Responsibility of Air Carriers.--After a notification of an 
order issued under subsection (a), an air carrier who provides air 
transportation for the individual prohibited from flying during the 
term of such prohibition is liable to the United States Government for 
a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.
    ``(d) Compromise and Setoff.--
            ``(1) Compromise.--The Secretary may compromise the amount 
        of a civil penalty imposed under this section.
            ``(2) Setoff.--The Government may deduct the amount of a 
        civil penalty imposed or compromised under this section from 
        amounts it owes the person liable for the penalty.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 463 of such 
title is amended by adding at the end the following:

``46317. Interference with cabin or flight crew.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 51554.

#### Protests 922206-G, etc., of Julius Kayser & Co. (New York).

*158Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

January 15, 1952

No. 56267.

protests 173975-K and 173719-K (New York).

#### Arrow Sales, Inc., and William L. Buck *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 64006.

protests 183965-K, etc. (Detroit).

#### Gooderham & Worts, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
March 15, 1960

No. 63978.

Suit 4977.

#### B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc., and W. J. Byrnes and Company, a/c M. S. Cowen Co. v. United States.

C.D. 2019 affirmed December 7, 1959. C.A.D. 726.
H. J. Res. 83

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–62 is further amended by striking ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ in

section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘December 2, 1999’’, and by striking

‘‘$346,483,754’’ in section 119 and inserting ‘‘$755,719,054’’. Public

Law 106–46 is amended by striking ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ and

inserting ‘‘December 2, 1999’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 68600.

protests 304608-K, etc. (New York).

#### Lafayette Brass Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Docket ID: EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0117

Technical Support Document

Addressing

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: Texas; Houston-GalvestonBrazoria 1997 Ozone Nonattainment Area; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 Ozone 

Standard

July 2015

The EPA reviewed the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) area ozone monitoring data from 

ambient ozone monitoring stations for the ozone seasons 2012 through 2014. The 2012-2014 

ozone season data for all the ozone monitors in the HGB area have been quality assured and 

certified by the EPA. The Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) website 

includes monitoring data for the Texas Avenue site, but Table 1 in our proposed rule for this 

docket does not.1 Data from the Texas Avenue site is excluded because the site does not meet 

siting criteria required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix E. The TCEQ has requested National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards exclusion for the pollutants monitored at this site since January 

2002. 

 

1 The TCEQ ozone monitors and data are posted at https://www.tceq.texas.gov/cgibin/compliance/monops/8hr_attainment.pl.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2453

NORTH CAROLINA COALITION FOR ISRAEL; KATHRYN WOLF; RABBI 

JEROME FOX; PERRI SHALOM-LIBERTY,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA; DURHAM CITY COUNCIL; 

STEVE SCHEWEL, Mayor; JILLIAN JOHNSON, Mayor Pro Tem; VERNETTA 

ALSTON; JAVIERA CABALLERO; DEDREANA FREEMAN; 

MARK-ANTHONY MIDDLETON; CHARLIE REECE; DURHAM HUMAN 

RELATIONS COMMISSION; ANDREA M. HUDSON, HRC Commissioner; 

DIANE STANDAERT, HRC Commission Chair; JOHN ROOKS, HRC 

Commissioner; MIKEL BARTON, HRC Commissioner,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00309-LCB-JLW)

Submitted: January 26, 2021 Decided: February 19, 2021

Before KING, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifford A. Rieders, RIEDERS, TRAVIS, HUMPHREY, WATERS & DOHRMANN, 

Williamsport, Pennsylvania; D.J. O’Brien III, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellants. 
2

Henry W. Sappenfield, Michele L. Livingstone, KENNON CRAVER, PLLC, Durham, 

North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, North Carolina Coalition for Israel, Kathryn Wolf, Rabbi Jerome Fox, 

and Perri Shalom-Liberty, appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and dismissing their complaint for lack of subject-matter 

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. N.C. Coal. for Isr. v. City of Durham, 

No. 1:19-cv-00309-LCB-JLW (M.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 2019). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00014

- CV

EVERHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

CAROLINE KING A/K/A CAROLINE WILSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 62nd District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 80296

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

EverBank , as successor by merger of EverHome Mortgage Company, appellant, and

Caroline King, aka Caroline Wilson, appellee, have filed with this Court a joint motion to

dismiss the pending appeal in this matter. The parties represent to this Court that they have

reached a full and final settlement. In such a case, no real controversy exists, and, in the absence

of a controversy, the appeal is moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1( a )(2).

We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Jus tice

Date Submitted: June 25, 2013

Date Decided: June 26, 2013
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00014-CV

EVERHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

CAROLINE KING A/K/A CAROLINE WILSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 62nd District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 80296

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EverBank, as successor by merger of EverHome Mortgage Company, appellant, and 

Caroline King, aka Caroline Wilson, appellee, have filed with this Court a joint motion to 

dismiss the pending appeal in this matter. The parties represent to this Court that they have 

reached a full and final settlement. In such a case, no real controversy exists, and, in the absence 

of a controversy, the appeal is moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: June 25, 2013

Date Decided: June 26, 2013
No. 55061.

#### Cleveland Worsted Mills *v.*United States,

protest 149661-K (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Travel Group (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jing Xie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jing XieJing XieChief Financial Officer





June 7, 2011
No. 63503.

protests 58/1840, etc. (New York).

#### H. C. Redemann, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*398Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(30 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable as follows: (a) As to the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547(a) ; and (b) as to items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after May 28, 1950, at 10 percent under said paragraph 1547(a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).
CHARLES C. SANMANN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FI LED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2716

Opinion filed July 24, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Charles C. Sanmann, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

VA N NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ.

, CONCUR.
Before the First Division,

May 17, 1956

No. 59909.

#### Camilli Albert *&*Laloue, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 272752-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1128 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1128

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to facilitate the 
    immigration to the United States of certain aliens born in the 
   Philippines or Japan who were fathered by United States citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1999

   Ms. Millender-McDonald (for herself, Ms. Lee, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. 
 Frost, Mr. Filner, Mrs. Mink of Hawaii, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Meeks of New 
    York, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Clay, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. 
  Christensen, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Jefferson, Mrs. Meek of 
  Florida, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Rush, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. 
Olver, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. LaFalce, 
and Mr. Wynn) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to facilitate the 
    immigration to the United States of certain aliens born in the 
   Philippines or Japan who were fathered by United States citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Asian Justice Act''.

SEC. 2. IMMIGRATION OF CERTAIN ALIENS BORN IN THE PHILIPPINES OR JAPAN 
              AND FATHERED BY U.S. CITIZENS.

    Section 204(f)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1154(f)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(I)'' after ``born''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``subsection,'' the following: 
        ``(II) in the Philippines after 1950 and before November 24, 
        1992, or (III) in Japan after 1950 and before the date of the 
        enactment of this subclause,''.
                                 <all>
```
S02Y1547.

#### IN THE MATTER OF J. CALEB CLARKE III.

(573 SE2d 81)

Per Curiam.

This matter is before the Court on Respondent J. Caleb Clarke’s petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law filed pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227. In his petition, Clarke admits that while serving as the administrator of an estate, he withdrew funds from *815the estate account for his own personal use (later paying it back), appropriated for his own personal use an automobile that was property of the estate even though he told the heirs he had sold the vehicle and deposited the proceeds into the estate account, and failed to file proper income tax returns on behalf of the estate between 1996 and 1999. Clarke admits that his conduct violated Standards 44 (lawyer shall not wilfully abandon or disregard a legal matter entrusted to him to the client’s detriment); 65 (A) (lawyer shall not fail to account for trust property held in a fiduciary capacity); and 65 (D) (lawyer shall not withdraw trust account funds for his own personal use) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and asks this Court to accept his petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law. The State Bar does not oppose the petition and asks this Court to enter an order accepting it.

Decided November 25, 2002.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paula J. Frederick, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

We have reviewed the record and agree to accept Clarke’s petition for the voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment. Bar Rule 4-110 (f). Accordingly, the name of J. Caleb Clarke III hereby is removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Clarke is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
19.

EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned herby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on form 10-Q, that:

o    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

o    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the company's financial condition and results of operation.



/s/ Francis J. Evanitsky
-------------------------------------
Francis J. Evanitsky, President & CEO


Dated: May 10, 2005
       ------------------------------
Before The Second Division,

July 16, 1948

No. 52461.

protests 947770-G and 954679-G (New York).

#### Jordan Marsh Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Robert C. Hamilton, the President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Robert C. Hamilton
-----------------------------
Robert C. Hamilton, President

Date: February 13, 2004

                                                                             29.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 84 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-62 is 
further amended by striking ``November 18, 1999'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``December 3, 1999'', and by striking ``$346,483,754'' in 
section 119 and inserting ``$755,719,054''. Public Law 106-46 is 
amended by striking ``November 18, 1999'' and inserting ``December 3, 
1999''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```