alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/Northern Trust Collective Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Randal Rein, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Randal ReinRandal ReinPrincipal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerAugust 14, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 210 (Wednesday, November 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Research Education Program 
Advancing the Careers of a Diverse Research Workforce (R25 Clinical 
Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: November 14, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Thomas F. Conway, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-507-9685, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f185999e9c9082df929e9f869088b19f9899df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3b7abacaea2b0eda0acadb4a2ba83adaaabeda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 26, 2023.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-24111 Filed 10-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AFS-12-021-E October 26, 2011

Exemption No. 10007A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0011

Mr. Chris Gularte Specialized Helicopters, LLC 150 Aviation Way, Suite 101 Watsonville, CA 95076

Dear Mr. Gularte:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10007. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By subm ission dated October 7, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Specialized Helicopters, LLC (Specialized Helicopters) for an extension of Exemption No. 10007. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Specialized Helic opters, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Specialized Helicopters.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10007 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Specialized Helicopters are s ubject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Specialized Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10007 to March 31, 2014 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon
Before the Third Division,

October 13, 1960

No. 64720.

#### All Boro Metal Products Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/32364 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Case No. 14,315a.

#### TYSON v. BELMONT.

[16 Betts, D. C. MS. 12.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb. 23, 1849.

Amendment of Pleadings.

[It is proper to allow plaintiffs, on motion, to amend by changing the form of action from debt to covenant, and by striking out the name of one of the -plaintiffs.]

[See Cases Kos. 14,316 and 1,281.]

BETTS, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on double motions; on the part of the defendant to set aside the proceedings for irregularity, and on the part of the. plaintiffs to amend the form of action stated in the writ, and to strike out the name of one of the plaintiffs from the pleadings. It is only necessary to notice the points raised on the latter motion.

First, it is objected that the court has no power to vary the nature of the action and the form of pleadings after issue joined between the parties; and, secondly, that the plaintiffs have been guilty of laches which exclude them from all appeal to the equity of the court. The act of congress of September 24, 1789 (1 Stat. 91, § 32), extends to United States courts the powers of amendment over process beyond that exercised under the English act of jeofails, or that of New York of similar effect Smith v. Jackson [Case No. 13,065). The judicial discretion of courts in respect to amendments is most ample, and in no way regulated by the consideration that they go to matters of form or substance, or the particular stage of the cause. Woodward v. Brown, 13 Pet. [38 U. S.] 1; Randolph v. Barrett, 16 Pet. [41 U. S.] 138; The Harmony [Case No. 6,081]; Calloway v. Dobson [Id. 2,325]. The stated rules of this court and the circuit court are framed upon this enlarged acceptation of their powers, and are designed to give suitors the advantage of amendments without any sjiecial appeal to the court in term. Dist. Ct. Rules 186, 241; Cir. Ct. Rules 40, 102. This being, however, an application in term time, the court can exercise inherently the powers given by statute or appertaining to its functions, without any specific direction by the rules.

The amendments sought for do not touch the merits in controversy, and no way prejudice the defence on those merits. It is of no importance to the right in controversy whether it be determined in an action of debt or covenant, or whether the suit be continued in the name of one or both plaintiffs. The plaintiff seeks a favor in ratification of his own errors, and it will be accorded him on the usual condition of paying the costs attending this motion. The plaintiff is accordingly allowed leave to amend his action by changing the form from debt to covenant, and to amend the declaration by striking out the name of Jans C. de Yries, as a plaintiff, on payment of the costs of this motion.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris E. Perkins, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Per-Se Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information
contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                        By: /s/ CHRIS E. PERKINS
                            -----------------------------------------------
                            Chris E. Perkins
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 9, 2005












                                        3
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata

VCU HEALTH SYSTEM AUTHORITY

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2073-11-2 PER CURIAM

FEBRUARY 7, 2012

SHERRY BROWN

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

(James G. Muncie, Jr.; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, 

P.C., on brief), for appellant.

No brief for appellee.

VCU Health System Authority appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission finding that Sherry Brown sustained a compensable injury by accident arising out 

of her employment when she repeatedly placed a morbidly obese patient’s foot onto the foot 

pedal of a wheelchair while in a squatting position for a couple of minutes, which established a 

work-related exertion that caused her injury. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s 

opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the commission in its final opinion. See Brown v. VCU Health Sys. Auth., VWC File No. 

VA000-0036-3696 (Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

 * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Mike Burns,
Chief Financial Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the
4thday of May, 2010.



| |  |     |  |                        
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Mike Burns         
| |  |     |  | Mike Burns             
| |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 64700.

#### Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 40953-K, etc. (San Francisco).

*319Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 608), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

December 3, 1962

No. 67235.

protests 59/6523, etc. (Charleston).

#### Charleston Overseas Forwarders, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:07 PM 

To: tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@LVMetals.com; Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; gbf1@pge.com; 

adelaski@standardsASAP.org; rroy@nrdc.org; snadel@aceee.org; eduardorobles@eaton.com; 

rgreeson@federalpacific.com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; chad.kennedy@us.schneiderelectric.com; john.caskey@nema.org; dave.millure@metglas.com; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; 

mark.e.stoering@xcelenergy.com; mwaltner@nrdc.org; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; 

thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com; paul.ryan@hitmet.com; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; Robert 

Berman; Phil Hopkinson; Caitlin Johnson; Freeman, Jeremiah (CONTR); Michael Rivest; Brian Coffey; 

Zhimei Luo; Chris Bolduc 

Subject: Roster of LV Committee Members 

Dear Colleagues, 

Attached is a list of selected members and alternates for the Low-Voltage Transformer 

Negotiating Work Group. Like its Medium Voltage counterpart, it's a distinguished and broadly 

representative group chosen from nominations received in response to last month's Federal 

Register call for nominations. Though only committee members sit at the table and vote, all 

representatives, advocates and members of the public are welcome to attend our meetings and to 

speak. 

The first meeting of the Low-Voltage (LV) Committee will be Sept. 28 in Washington, DC, from 

9 am - 5 pm. Details to follow. 

I look forward to working with you. 

All best, 

Richard Parker 

Convenor and Facilitator
<PAGE>

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                        RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT


         THIS Amendment (the "Amendment"), dated as of September 4, 2003, to the
Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated August 4, 2003, is entered into between
Jarden Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and James E. Lillie,
(the "Employee").

WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company are parties to that certain
Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated August 4, 2003, (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement on the
terms and conditions set forth more fully below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
set forth in this Amendment, the Company and the Employee hereby agree as
follows:

         1. Section 2.a.(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to
read as follows:

                  "(i)     the date that the per share stock price of the Common
                           Stock equals or exceeds forty-two dollars ($42.00),
                           subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 18.4 of the
                           Plan or as otherwise mutually agreed in writing
                           between the parties (for purposes of clarity, the
                           term "stock price" above means the closing stock
                           price of the Common Stock); or"

         2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect as the same was in effect immediately prior to
the effectiveness of this Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed this
Agreement as of the date set forth above.

                                      JARDEN CORPORATION


                                      By: /s/ Ian G.H. Ashken
                                         -----------------------------
                                         Name:  Ian G.H. Ashken
                                         Title: Vice Chairman, Chief Financial
                                                Officer and Secretary


                                       /s/ James E. Lillie
                                      --------------------------------
                                      James E. Lillie
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350

 

I, Kathleen Mason, the Chief Executive Officer of Tuesday MorningCorporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.                                       Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tuesday Morning Corporation for theperiod ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TuesdayMorning Corporation.

 

 
| Date: October 31, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Kathleen Mason                       |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | Kathleen Mason   Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata

VCU HEALTH SYSTEM AU THORITY MEMORANDUM OPINION *
v. Record No. 2073

- 11

- 2 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SHERRY BROWN

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS ’ COMPENSATION COM MISSION (James G . Muncie, Jr.; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief) , for appellant.
No brief for appellee.

VCU Health System Authority appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compe nsation Commission finding that Sherry Brown sustai ned a compensable injury by accident arising out of her employment when she repeatedly placed a morbidly obese patient’s foot onto the foot pedal of a wheelchair while in a squatting position for a couple of minutes, which established a
work

- related exerti on that caused her injury . We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Brown v. VCU Health Sys

. Auth

. , VWC File No.
VA000

- 0036

- 3696 ( Sept

. 26, 2011 ). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1

- 403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary C. Evans, chairman and chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 12, 2015/s/ Gary C. EvansGary C. Evans,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





In connection with the Annual Report of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph C. Daches, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 12, 2015/s/ Joseph C. DachesJoseph C. Daches,Chief Financial Officer
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101933 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of
our report dated February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account Seven relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003