alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,596
<PP&E>                                             775
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (99,075)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,501
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,812)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

January 23, 1946

No. 50834.

#### Protests 110648-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons et al. (Buffalo, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,387,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  238,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (34,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     193,384,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,506,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             261,296,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     90,986,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    213,000
<COMMON>                                       335,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,092,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               261,296,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,010,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,754,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,645,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,256,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   535,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            721,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   721,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Peskin, 127 Ohio St.3d 1251, 2010-Ohio-6087.]

OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. PESKIN. 

[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Peskin, 127 Ohio St.3d 1251, 2010-Ohio6087.] 

(No. 2009-2009 — Submitted November 17, 2010 — Decided 

November 24, 2010.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Lawrence Frederick Peskin, Attorney 

Registration No. 0059391, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 29, 2010, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 

period of two years with 18 months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent 

has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 

V(10)(A). Therefore, 

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the 

practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent submit, 

within one year of the release of the April 29, 2010 Supreme Court opinion in this 

matter, a qualified health-care professional’s certification that he has successfully 

completed a substance abuse treatment program and is, in that professional’s 

opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, able to practice law in a 

competent, ethical, and professional manner. It is further ordered that if 

respondent fails to do this, the stay will be lifted, and he will serve the full twoyear suspension. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 

copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 

costs of publication. 

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Peskin, 125 Ohio 

St.3d 244, 2010-Ohio-1811, 927 N.E.2d 598. 

 BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

______________________
No. 52150.

protests 6933-K, etc. (New York).

#### Sambrooks, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks, Inc.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441), the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41253 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAMON HERNANDEZ

- RAMIREZ , also known as Ramon Hernandez,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the South ern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 492

- 1

_______________________ ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM: On July 19, 2017, we issued an opinion in this case denying Ramon Hernandez

- Ramirez’s challenge to his sentence and affirming the court’s entry of judgment under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)

. United States v. Hernandez

- Ramirez , 693 F. App’x 371 (5th Cir. 2017). Hernandez

- Ramirez petitioned the Supreme

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. Judge Edward Prado, a member of the original panel in this case, retired from the court on April 2, 2018, and therefore did not participate in the opinion on remand . The opinion on remand is issued by a quorum. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d)

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 17, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41253 Document: 00514605675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2018No. 16

- 41253

2 Court for certiorari. Following its decision in Sessions v. Dimaya , 584 U.S. ___, 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018), the Court remanded this case to our court “for further consideration” in light of Dimaya

. Hernandez

- Ramire z v. United States , 138 S. Ct. 1982 (2018). We requested supplemental briefing from the parties and now modify our judgment in part. The parties agree, and we conclude, that the holding in Dimaya does not impact our affirmance of the sentence. They disa gree, however, about whether we should reconsider the holding regarding § 1326(b)(2) . Hernandez

- Ramirez argues we should modify the judgment of conviction to reflect conviction under § 1326(b)(1 )

. See United States v. Ovalle

- Garcia , 868 F.3d 313, 314 (5t h Cir. 2017) (conviction under § 1326(b)(2) has significant immigration consequences). The Government agrees that Dimaya supercedes our prior holding resting on the definition of “aggravated felony” in 8 U.S.C. §
1 101(a)(43)(F) that incorporated the defi nition contained in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) but argues that Dimaya leaves 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) undisturbed. In the interim period, the law in this area has continued to develop. We conclude that the case should be reinstated on the docket and that the parties should file full briefing in accordance with the usual schedule. Accordingly, we VACATE our prior affirmance and REINSTATE the appeal on our docket for new briefing and consideration. Case: 16-41253 Document: 00514605675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2018
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Salem Communications Corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge: · the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  · the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: May 7, 2010By: /s/ EDWARD G. ATSINGER IIIEdward G. Atsinger IIIChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 441 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 441

Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the investigation into the 
        terrorist attack on the U.S.S. COLE on October 12, 2000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2000

  Mr. Riley submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the investigation into the 
        terrorist attack on the U.S.S. COLE on October 12, 2000.

Whereas on October 12, 2000, 17 United States Navy sailors aboard the guided 
        missile destroyer U.S.S. COLE (DDG-67) were killed by terrorists while 
        their ship was being refueled in the Aden harbor in Yemen;
Whereas United States and Yemeni security forces and intelligence and law 
        enforcement officials have been working together since the attack to 
        investigate and apprehend those responsible;
Whereas numerous United States officials have joined President Clinton in 
        condemning this attack and have committed their total support to 
        bringing all of those involved to justice;
Whereas both the House of Representatives and the Senate have voted unanimously 
        to condemn the attack; and
Whereas recent news accounts and official statements have brought into serious 
        question the level of cooperation being afforded to United States 
        investigators by the Yemeni Government: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Government of Yemen should give United States 
        investigators complete and unfettered access to fully 
        investigate and question any and all suspects in the October 
        12, 2000, terrorist attack on the guided missile destroyer 
        U.S.S. COLE (DDG-67) while that ship was being refueled in the 
        Aden harbor in Yemen, including access to any Yemeni Government 
        officials suspected of having played a role in that attack; and
            (2) the President and senior administration officials 
        leading the United States investigation of that attack should 
        use whatever means are necessary to guarantee that 
        investigators of the Federal Bureau of Investigation have 
        access to the information and people they need to bring to 
        justice everyone involved in the attack on the U.S.S. COLE.
                                 <all>
```
No. 55759.

protest 160279-K (New York).

#### Lowengart & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the' protest.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


       I, Philip Pilevsky, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial
officer of Philips International Realty Corp. (the "Registrant"), do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon
a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2005 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"):

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
              except that the Consolidated Statement of Net Assests in
              Liquidation as of December 31, 2004, is unaudited;

              and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Registrant.


DATE: May 16, 2005                By: /s/ PHILIP PILEVSKY
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Philip Pilevsky
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  and Principal Financial Officer



            This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Philips International Realty Corp. and will be retained by
Philips International Realty Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98811; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2023-057]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule Related 
to Physical Port Fees

October 27, 2023.
    On September 1, 2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
amend certain connectivity and port fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on September 20, 2023.\4\ On September 29, 2023, pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\5\ the Commission: (1) temporarily suspended 
the proposed rule change; and (2) instituted proceedings under Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On October 25, 2023, the 
Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CboeEDGX-2023-057).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98396 (September 14, 
2023), 88 FR 64960.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98653, 88 FR 68774 
(October 4, 2023).
    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24176 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# LE_Less2Years_4.10.2024

https://www.ferc.gov/elibrary-quick-helphttps://elibrary.ferc.gov/
dfin-ex108_115.htm



 

Exhibit 10.8

Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan

Each director shall receive (A) an annual cash retainer (a “Cash Retainer”) and (B) an annual equity retainer (an “Equity Retainer”) to be paid in the form of a grant of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) each on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as described further below and pursuant to the Company’s Performance Incentive Plan in effect on such date (the “Plan”).   


	
1)
	
Cash Retainer.  
	
 





	
 
	
a)
	
Each director shall be entitled to a Cash Retainer equal to $80,000.
	
 





	
 
	
b)
	
Any director in a leadership role shall be entitled to an additional Cash Retainer in the applicable amount described in the table below:  
	
 




 


		
	
Chairman of the Board
	
$50,000

	
Chairman of the Audit Committee
	
$20,000

	
Chairman of the Compensation Committee
	
$20,000

	
Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee
	

$15,000





	
 
	
c)
	
Any director serving on more than one committee shall be entitled to an additional Cash Retainer of $5,000 for each additional committee.
	
 




 


	
2)
	
Equity Retainer.
	
 





	
 
	
a)
	
Each director shall be entitled to an Equity Retainer equal to $150,000.
	
 





	
 
	
b)
	
The Chairman of the Board shall be entitled to an additional Equity Retainer equal to $50,000.    
	
 





	
 
	
c)
	
The number of shares granted shall be calculated pursuant to the terms of the Plan and shall be rounded down to the nearest share.
	
 





	
 
	
d)
	
RSUs will vest and be payable on the first anniversary of the grant date, but will be payable in full on the earlier of (i) the date the director ceases to be a Director of the Company and (ii) a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan). 
	
 





	
 
	
e)
	
Dividend equivalents on the RSUs issued hereunder are deferred, credited with interest quarterly at the same rate as five-year U.S. government bonds and paid out in cash at the same time the corresponding portion of the award becomes payable. 
	
 





	
 
	
f)
	
The Company shall make payment of the RSUs in Company common stock. 
	
 




 


	
3)
	
General.
	
 





	
 
	
a)
	
If any director joins the Board on a date other than the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting, then a pro-rata portion of each of the applicable Cash Retainer and Equity Retainer from the date joined to the next Annual Meeting date shall be granted; provided, however, that any director of R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (“RRD”) who joins the Board in connection with the spin-off of the Company from RRD shall not be entitled to such pro-rata portion of the Cash Retainer or Equity Retainer. 
	
 




Each director is expected to comply with the terms of any stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors that are established by the Company, as in effect from time to time.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,175,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  273,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (104,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     194,951,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,503,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             270,138,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    102,476,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        213
<COMMON>                                           335
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,266,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               270,138,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,217,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,904,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                72,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,025,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                313,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   139,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            174,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   174,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.00
        

</TABLE>