alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

                         CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY
                       NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC
                                 WITH FORM 10-K


      I, Kevin Cloyd, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of New Century Home
Equity Loan Trust 2005-4, Asset Backed Notes, Series 2005-4;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.


                                        NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Cloyd
                                        Title: President
                                        Date: 3/29/06
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARY ISABEL RUIZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 18 1

- C R

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 4

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 2 0160C07963 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’ s third m otion for extension of time within which to file the

brief until June 2, 2020

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE THE

STATE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza

, State ’s attorney, prepare the State ’s

brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 2 , 20 20

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4 th day of May , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph T. Crowley, the Chief Financial Officer of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that to my knowledge the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that as of the date of this statement, the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all in material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is to solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Date:  February 12, 2004                  /s/ Joseph T. Crowley
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Joseph T. Crowley
                                          Chief Financial Officer
VENDOR NAME: Imager Software, Inc. (ISC) 

SmartBUY Blanket Purchase Agreement (SmartBUY) Summary 

A Federal government-wide ordering agreement with ISC has been established for software, training and 

maintenance on behalf of General Services Administration (GSA) SmartBUY. This contract reduces 

contracting and open market costs, such as search for sources, the development of technical documents, 

solicitations and the evaluation of bids and offers. This SmartBUY will further decrease costs, reduce 

paperwork and save time by eliminating the need for repetitive, individual purchases from the schedule 

contract. The objective is to create a purchasing mechanism for the government that works better and costs 

less. 

This BPA has been designated as a co-branded GSA/Federal Acquisition Service (FAS)/SmartBUY Program 

Management Office (PMO) and Department of Defense (DoD)/Enterprise Software Initiative (ESI) 

Agreement, which is open to all U.S. Executive Agencies (as defined in 48 CFR 21), including the DoD, 

authorized state and local government entities and authorized contractors, except as restricted herein. 

Vendor Information 

ISC is a full service software development company that provides a variety of software development and 

consulting services. In its geospatial practice, ISC offers data visualization, analysis and integration solutions.. 

GSA Contract #: GSQ0009AE0020 

GSA Schedule 70

GSA Schedule #: GS-35F-0636P

DUNS Number: 805277969 

Federal Tax ID#: 593030550 

Product name: MapDotNet 

Brief description of product line(s) 

MapDotNet is a web-enabled GIS platform for enterprise applications and websites. MapDotNet offers a set 

of web services for rendering map images and tiles and for performing spatial analysis and editing. 

MapDotNet consumes spatial data from multiple sources, including Shapefiles, PostGIS, ArcSDE and SQL 

Server 2008. 

See Products and Prices of the agreement for a complete list of products and prices. 

Vendor information on terms and conditions

Vendor contact information

Imager Software, Inc. (ISC) 

2932 Wellington Circle 

Tallahassee, FL 32309-6891 

http://www.goisc.com/ 
Edwin Lott 

Phone: (850) 566-8421 

Email: edwin.lott@goisc.com 

Government Points of Contact 

U.S. General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service 

SmartBUY Program Management Office 

10304 Eaton Place 

Fairfax, VA 22030-2213 

Michael W. Hargrove 

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) 

Suite 3A-05 

Phone: (703) 306-7701 

Fax: (703) 306-6816 

Email: michael.hargrove@gsa.gov 

Stephen F. Bell 

Project Manager (PM) 

Suite 3A-15 

Phone: (703) 306-7595 

Fax: (703) 306-6816 

Email: stephen.bell@gsa.gov 

Cooperative Purchasing Certification (State and Local Agency Use) 

132-32 Term Software License No

132-33 Perpetual Software License Yes

132-34 Maintenance of Software Yes

132-50 Classroom Training Yes

132-51 IT Professional Services Yes

132-52 Electronic Commerce Services No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6650

REUBEN GARRISON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus F. W. GREENE, Warden; E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER; ALL AGENTS OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-98-399-3) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 16, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reuben Garrison, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Reuben Garrison appeals the district courts order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Garrison v. Greene , No. CA-98-399-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23092]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 
552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss 
the Commission's business for the month of October.

DATES: Friday, October 20, 2023, 10 a.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place virtually and is open to the public 
via livestream on the Commission's YouTube page: https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-8371; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e6e6b7c72777d7f78787f776c6d5e6b6d7d7d6c30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa8a8f989693999b9c9c9b938889ba8f89999988d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This business meeting is open to the public. 
Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The 
web link to access CART (in English) on October 20, 2023, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-
only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not 
an exact transcript.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
III. Discussion and Vote on 2024 USCCR Business Meeting Calendar
IV. Presentation by the Texas Advisory Committee Chair on interim 
report, Mental Healthcare in the Texas Juvenile Justice System
V. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Staff Director's Report
VI. Adjourn Meeting

    Dated: October 16, 2023.
Angelia Rorison,
USCCR Media and Communications Director.
[FR Doc. 2023-23092 Filed 10-16-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
OPINION

No. 04-10-00714-CV

IN RE Andrew CAMERON, Sylvia Maria CAMERON,

and Vanessa CAMERON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 20, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 5, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this 

court order the Honorable Gloria Saldaña to set aside the order granting the motion for new trial. 

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator 

is not entitled to relief sought against the Honorable Gloria Saldaña. Accordingly, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CI-01356, styled In the Interest of S.A.J., III, pending in the 

224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Gloria Saldaña presiding. However, the order 

granting the new trial was signed by the Honorable Renée F. McElhaney, presiding judge of the 73rd Judicial 

District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
Before the Second Division,

January 18, 1946

No. 50822.

#### Protests 933185-G, etc., of Accurate Millinery Co. et al. (New York).

*209Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats or hoods of ramie and cellophane similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291. Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 104

To disapprove a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating

to proposed revisions to the national pollutant discharge elimination

system program and Federal antidegradation policy and proposed revisions to the water quality planning and management regulations concerning total maximum daily load.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 2000

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

JOINT RESOLUTION

To disapprove a rule issued by the Environmental Protection

Agency relating to proposed revisions to the national

pollutant discharge elimination system program and Federal antidegradation policy and proposed revisions to the

water quality planning and management regulations concerning total maximum daily load.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency and published in the Fed5 eral Register on July 13, 2000, relating to proposed revi6 sions to the national pollutant discharge elimination sys-
2

•HJ 104 IH

1 tem program and Federal antidegradation policy and pro2 posed revisions to the water quality planning and manage3 ment regulations concerning total maximum daily load,

4 and such rule shall have no force or effect.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 25, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40706 c/w

03-40707

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO DAMIAN MARTINEZ-CARRILLO,

also known as Pedro Martinez-Carrillo,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-99-—4411

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Damian Martinez-Carrillo (Martinez), represented by the

Federal Public Defender (FPD), seeks to appeal two judgments

revoking probation imposed following two prior guilty-plea

convictions for illegally entering the United States. The FPD did

not file a timely notice of appeal, nor seek a timely extension of

the time for filing a notice of appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)

& (4). Instead, five months after the revocation, the FPD filed a
No. 03-40706 c/w

03-40707

-2-

motion for the “judicial remedy” of an out-of-time appeal. The

district court granted the motion.

“[A] district court does not have the authority to create

appellate jurisdiction simply by ordering an out-of-time direct

criminal appeal. Compliance with the Federal Rules of Appellate

Procedure is imperative.” United States v. West, 240 F.3d 456, 459

(5th Cir. 2001). West did not create a new remedy, but addressed

only the proper procedures for granting an out-of-time appeal

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Id. at 459-61 (“Since the 1960s, our

court, pursuant to a § 2255 motion, has permitted an out-of-time

appeal when a defendant was denied assistance of counsel on appeal,

through counsel’s failure to perfect an appeal.”) (citations

omitted). 

We VACATE the district court’s order granting the “judicial

remedy” of an out-of-time appeal, and we REMAND the case. The

district court should determine, in light of Castro v. United

States, __ U.S. __, 124 S. Ct. 786, 792 (2003), whether it will

construe the motion for “judicial remedy” as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion and, if so, whether Martinez received ineffective assistance

of appellate counsel. If the district court construes the motion

as a § 2255 motion and finds ineffective assistance, then the

constructive § 2255 motion should be dismissed without prejudice

and the judgment reentered. The district court may accept any

pleadings or conduct any hearings necessary for compliance with

this order. 
No. 03-40706 c/w

03-40707

-3-

ORDER VACATED; CASE REMANDED.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

ID Number: P-04-0153 

ENGINEER: Hall/WRL/CLH 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: 

General Eqp.: 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials): 

CRSS (12/11/2003): 

Chemical Category: 

Molecular Formula: 

VP: 

S-H2O: 

MW: 

Phys State: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (12/12/2003): 

Groundwater: 

Health: 

Eco: 

PBT Potential: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 

ASSUMPTIONS: 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW? 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

ID Number: P-04-0153 

PROC/USE: 

Site/Location: 

Days/yr: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.): 

WATER: 1) 10.4 kg/site-day over Days/year 

and 

2) Worst: 2.4 kg/site-day over Days/year 

 Typical: 0.24 kg/site-day over Days/year 

from: 

to: 

Basis: 

AIR: negligible 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

 Tot. # of workers: 

 Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

 mg/day over Days/yr 

 Number of workers with inhalation exposure: 

 Basis: 

Inhalation Monitoring Data Review 

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit, 

or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

OR 

b) Hazard rating for health of 2 or greater? 

Inhalation monitoring data desired? 

Dermal:
S02Y1153.

#### IN THE MATTER OF JIMMY KELLY REEVES.

(564 SE2d 187)

Per Curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Respondent Jimmy Kelly Reeves’s Petition for Voluntary Surrender of License, *240which is tantamount to disbarment pursuant to Bar Rule 4-110 (f). The State Bar has no objection to the acceptance of Reeves’s petition.

Decided May 28, 2002.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

In his petition, Reeves admits that in December 2000, he was retained to represent a church in Putnam County in a real estate matter; that he was paid a retainer of $3,500 for such representation; and that he failed to perform the agreed upon representation. He further admits that his conduct in this matter constituted a “violation of the Rules governing the practice of law sufficient for disbarment.”

We have reviewed the record and accept Reeves’s petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in this state. The name of Jimmy Kelly Reeves is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. Reeves is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23732]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: (23-108)]

Heliophysics Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a 
meeting of the Heliophysics Advisory Committee (HPAC). This Committee 
functions in an advisory capacity to the Director, Heliophysics 
Division, in the NASA Science Mission Directorate. The meeting will be 
held for the purpose of soliciting, from the science community and 
other persons, scientific and technical information relevant to program 
planning.

DATES: Tuesday, November 14, 2023, 10:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, 
November 15, 2023, 9:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; and Thursday, November 16, 
2023, 9:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. All times are Eastern Time.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be virtual. The meeting 
will take place telephonically and via WebEx. Any interested person 
must use a touch-tone phone to participate in this meeting. To join by 
telephone, the numbers are: 1-929-251-9612 or 1-415-527-5035, for each 
day.
    The WebEx link is https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/j.php?MTID=m2c166394b3bdd893949b1a410ce31f40 and the meeting number is 
2764 871 5032. The password is pA6QJxWv@83 (72675998 from phones and 
video systems) (case sensitive), for each day.
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

 Heliophysics Program Annual Performance Review According to 
the Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act
 Heliophysics Division Update

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. KarShelia Kinard, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-2355 or 
[email protected].
    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Patricia Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-23732 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
```
Before the Second Division,

June 29, 1950

No. 54506.

#### Thalson Co. *v.*United States,

protest 136939-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 129

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking

4 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘Decem5 ber 15, 2000’’.

Æ
Before the Third Division,

April 9, 1962

No. 66683.

#### Herbert B. Moller *v.*United States,

protests 61/17748, etc. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of wire cloth and seamed wire cloth, made in Canada from wire rod or wire cloth, respectively, exported from the United States and returned to the United States for further processing and that all of the applicable customs regulations have now been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58833.

protest 240063-K (New York).

#### Air-Freight Clearance Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It appearing from the papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)
<PAGE>   1
                              CERPROBE CORPORATION
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                   Exhibit 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF CERPROBE CORPORATION:
      Cerprobe Interconnect Solutions, Inc.
      SVTR, Inc.
      Cerprobe Europe Limited
      Cerprobe Asia Holdings Pte Ltd
      Cerprobe Europe S.A.S.

SUBSIDIARIES OF CERPROBE ASIA HOLDINGS PTE LTD:
      Cerprobe Asia Pte Ltd *

SUBSIDIARIES OF CERPROBE ASIA PTE LTD:
      Cerprobe Singapore Pte Ltd
      Cerprobe Taiwan Co., Ltd.

*     70% owned by Cerprobe Corporation until August 18, 1997, at which time
      Cerprobe's ownership was reduced to 60%.