alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), Christopher A. Milner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James J. Lillis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Christopher A. Milner
Name:   Christopher A. Milner
Title:    Chief Executive Officer
Date:    November 9, 2007

/s/ James J. Lillis
Name:   James J. Lillis
Title:    Chief Financial Officer
Date:    November 9, 2007

---
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company      as of and for the period covered by thisReport. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       June 16, 2008 | /s/ Herbert A. Granath      |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                           | Name:                       | Herbert      A. Granath |
|                           | Title:                      | Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                           |                        |
| Date:       June 16, 2008 | /s/ Robert C. Clauser,  Jr. |
|                           | Name:                       | Robert      C. Clauser, Jr. |
|                           | Title:                      | Executive      Vice President, Chief |
|                           |                        | Financial      Officer and Assistant Secretary(Principal      Financial Officer) |
Before the Second Division,

September 4, 1947

No. 51885.

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 687322-G, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 3, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128089 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan SCOTT J. GRADY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128089 COA: 256920 WCAC: 03-000305 CARAMAGNO FOODS COMPANY and AMERICAN COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, and

ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and KELLY
, JJ., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

t1031 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 3, 2005

Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the SalesLogix Corporation 1996 Equity
Incentive Plan, SalesLogix Corporation 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan and SalesLogix Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report
dated January 29, 1999, except for Notes 2 and 8, as to which the date is April
30, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of SalesLogix Corporation
included in Amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement (Form S-1) and in the
related Prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

         Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of SalesLogix
Corporation listed in Item 16(b). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Phoenix, Arizona
June 18, 1999
No. 56262.

protest 16791A-K (New York).

#### Mayhew Copley, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation' of counsel that the merchandise consists of'music boxes the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 55455, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chad M. Cohen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of Zillow, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                     |  |  |  |              |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | ZILLOW, INC.
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 16, 2015 |  |  |  | By:          |  | /s/ CHAD M. COHEN                    
|                     |  |  |  | Name:        |  | Chad M. Cohen                        
|                     |  |  |  | Title:       |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), the undersigned officer of Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.), a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: October 14, 2014
/s/ Frank TerzoFrank TerzoChief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and for no other purpose.
June 26, 1946

No. 51238.

Suit 4523.

#### United *States*v. *Wm. A. Foster & Co., Inc. (Standard Rolling Mills, Inc.).*

Reap. Dec. 6175 ¿ffirmed May 7, 1946. C. A. D. 336.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the FTC Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane Campbell, Chief Human Capital Officer, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 436-0152.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Publication of the Performance Review Board (PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314 (c) (4). The PRB reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings, performance awards, and pay-for-performance pay adjustments to the Chair.

The following individuals have been designated to serve on the Commission's Performance Review Board:

Dianne Campbell, Chief Human Capital Officer

Anisha Dasgupta, General Counsel

Monique Fortenberry, Director, Office of Workplace Inclusivity & Opportunity

Tara Koslov, Deputy Director, Bureau of Competition

Alison Oldale, Deputy Director, Bureau of Economics

David Robbins, Executive Director, PRB Chair

Monica Vaca, Deputy Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection

By direction of the Commission.

April J. Tabor,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-23993 Filed 10-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2150]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 281 (Expansion of Service 
Area) Under Alternative Site Framework; Miami, Florida

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Board to grant to qualified 
corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or 
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
zones;
    Whereas, Miami-Dade County, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 281, 
submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-22-2023, docketed 
March 22, 2023) for authority to expand the service area of the zone to 
include all of Miami-Dade County, Florida, as described in the 
application, within the Miami Customs and Border Protection port of 
entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (88 FR 18295-18296, March 28, 2023) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiners' report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 281 to expand the service area 
under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including section 400.13, and to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the zone.

    Dated: October 30, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-24357 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
1

Muldoon, Albert (OST)

From: Steve.watershed <steve.watershed@gmail.com>

Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:46 PM

To: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

Subject: Funter bay air service

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Dear Sir

We live in Funter bay and depend on Ward air for most of our transportation and supply needs.

We encourage you to continue to contract with Ward air.

It takes years of experience to provide safe air service in this area due to the extreme weather and tide factors in the

area.

A change in carriers would likely make our transportation more difficult.

Thank you for your consideration.

Steve Buckley

Elizabeth Arnold

Sent from my iPhone
No. 58840.

protest 226075-K (New York).

#### Melchers, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Apparel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 31, 2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1 as filed with the SEC on May 2, 2011, Amendment No. 2 as filed with the SEC on May 3, 2011, and this Amendment No.
3 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (together, the Report), I, Dov Charney, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Apparel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2011                                                            
|                                                                              
|/s/ Dov Charney                                                               
|Dov Charney Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
No. 58393.

protest 188741-K (New York).

#### Acrow, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of building shores, struts, or props, and parts thereof, the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60697.

#### Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 278301-K (New York).

*483Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 6 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# L_2022245EN.01007001.xml

| 22.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/70

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2022/1032 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2022 amending Regulations (EU) 2017/1938 and (EC) No 715/2009 with regard to gas storage

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 173 of 30 June 2022
  )

On page 27, Article 1, point (2), in new Article 6d(1)(b):

for:

| ‘(b) | from 2023: as set pursuant to Article 6a(4).’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

from 2023: as set pursuant to Article 6a(4).’,

read:

| ‘(b) | from 2023: as set pursuant to Article 6a(7).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

from 2023: as set pursuant to Article 6a(7).’.

---
P.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

127) ll-K- (B) -117 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 127 of 325 
P.2 

IFCAM MODIFICATIONS SUMMARY (See related letter June 15, 1983) 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Short, EPA:EAB. 

June 22, 1983. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-113
March 27, 1961

No. 65370.

#### Aut Customs Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/14609.

Protest abandoned February 6, 1961. (Not published.) Plaintiff’s application for rebearing denied.
(Reap. Dec. 10898)

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. A-7457.

(Decided February 16, 1965)

*Barnes, Richardson é Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to approval by the Court, as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed D.R. (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner David O. Ramsey (Examiner’s Name) on the invoice covered by the above-entitled appeal.

> 2. That the involved merchandise consists of a pipe organ exported from Canada.

> 3. That the involved merchandise was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165) and is not identified on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) ; that appraisement was accordingly made under section 402, Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by said Customs Simplification Act.

> 4. That on or about the dates of exportation of the involved merchandise, such or similar merchandise was not freely sold or offered for exportation to the United States; that on or about said dates of exportation and for a period of at least 90 days thereafter, such or similar imported merchandise was not freely sold or offered for domestic consumption in the United States; that appraisement was accordingly made under constructed value as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> 5. That the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as that involved in *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 10750, wherein installation expenses in the United States were held to form no part of statutory constructed value; that the record in said case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 6. That the constructed value of the involved merchandise as defined in said section 402 (d) is $42,659, net packed.

> 7. That this appeal may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the incorporated record, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision, I find the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as here-*506inabove identified, is constructed value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and bold that such statutory value is $42,659, net, packed.

In all other respects, this appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
From: cdenning56@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:23:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christine Denning

Tulare, CA 93274
No. 59930.

#### Crown Abrasive Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 247185-K and 247488-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollis on, J.

The protests were dismissed.