alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Brian Fiddler, Chief Financial Officer of Hard
  Creek Nickel Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation
  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: June 30, 2008

| | /s/
      Brian Fiddler      
| | -----------------------------
| | Brian Fiddler                
| | Chief Financial Officer,     
| | Hard Creek Nickel Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
  the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
  written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hard Creek Nickel
  Corporation and will be retained by Hard Creek Nickel Corporation and furnished
  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Before the Second Division,

May 16, 1963

No. 67728.

#### L. H. Graves, a/c The Haymarket Realty Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/13853, 58/13854, and 58/13858 (Laredo).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of coils of steel cotton tie strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of *R. W. Smith and John D. Winchester a/c Doherty Petroleum Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(49 CCPA 120, C.A.D. 806), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR 

WASHINGTON 

Mr. David V. Modeer 

General Manager, Central Arizona Project 

P.O. Box 43020 

Phoenix, Arizona 85080 

Dear Mr. Modeer: 

APR 0 6 2012 

Thank you for your letter dated March 12, 2012, to Secretary Salazar, Environmental Protection 

Agency Administrator Jackson, and Department of Energy Secretary Chu concerning 

Administrator Jackson's letter regarding the future of Navajo Generating Station (NGS); and 

your letter dated February 24, 2012, to EPA Region 9 Administrator Jared Blumenfeld and me 

regarding the report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) on options for NGS 

compliance with Clean Air Act Regional Haze requirements. Secretary Salazar asked that I 

respond on behalf of the Department. 

In response to Administrator Jackson's meeting request, I anticipate that she, Secretary Salazar, 

and Secretary Chu will meet in the near future to discuss the long-term future of the NGS and the 

challenges of transitioning to a cleaner energy future while continuing to meet the many tribal 

and other needs currently served by NGS. I do not believe that this meeting will detract in any 

way from EPA's intensive focus on preparation of a proposed Best Available Retrofit 

Technology (BART) rule for NGS. We have discussed with EPA officials the importance of 

issuing the proposed rule at the earliest possible date now that the report by NREL addressing 

BART issues at NGS has been submitted. 

We understand Administrator Jackson's letter to be referring to long-term planning, not matters 

that would in any way affect the current BART proceeding. As we have discussed with EPA 

officials, the Interior Department believes that a critical first step in addressing the long-term 

future ofNGS is the preparation of what has been referred to as "Phase 2" of the NREL NGS 

study, addressing long-term energy generation options for NGS. 

We look forward to working with CAP on all matters relating to the Central Arizona Project and 

the Navajo Generating Station. 

Sincerely,
Exhibit 10.2

   Change of Control Agreement between Premier Bancorp, Inc., Premier Bank and
                               John C. Soffronoff

     Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 13, 1998.


<PAGE>
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 124

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking
2

•HJ 124 EH

1 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘Novem2 ber 4, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 3,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 124

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.
Order entered May 22, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00630-CV

No. 05-15-00631-CV

No. 05-15-00632-CV

IN RE AARON MICHAEL REEVES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 065573, No. 065574, No. 065572

ORDER

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
No. 53385.

protests 110958-K, etc. (Louisville).

#### Popper Morson Company *v.*United States,

*131Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols*& *Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51273.

#### Protests 104402-K, etc., of Caradine Hat Co. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of hats-of the same kind in all material respects as those the classification of which was involved in Abstract 49035. In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65354.

#### Rubin Wachman et al. *v.*United States,

protests 186446-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, the claim at 22% percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for other metal articles, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “E,” stipulated to be the same as the merchandise involved in said Abstract 62036, except that they are plated with gold, were held dutiable at 32% percent under the provision *394in said paragraph 397, as modified, *supra,*supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), for articles, not specially provided for, plated with gold, or colored with gold lacquer, as claimed.
# Official Journal C 33A/15 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 33A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5015 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 33A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5015 February 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 033A/01 | Notice to readers | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 033A/01

Notice to readers

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 033A/02 | Corrigendum to the reserve list of the open competition EPSO/AD/43/06 — Lawyer-Linguists (AD7) with main language Bulgarian (OJ C 22 A, 31.1.2007) | 3 |

Corrigenda

2007/C 033A/02

Corrigendum to the reserve list of the open competition EPSO/AD/43/06 — Lawyer-Linguists (AD7) with main language Bulgarian (OJ C 22 A, 31.1.2007)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 26, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 26, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0360. CITY OF DOUGLASVILLE, GEORGIA et al. v. BART BOYD.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18CV01095
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>  
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HOENIG
GROUP INC. JUNE 30, 1997 FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      20,569,111
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,416,602
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         16,993,961
<PP&E>                                       2,267,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,082,682
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                  11,542,764
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       108,007
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,397,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,082,682
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           919,247
<COMMISSIONS>                               34,272,946
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                3,021,707
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                               9,611,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,066,853
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,897,802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

       


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 23.1 FT


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report on the consolidated financial statements of Futech
Interactive Products, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1998 and for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 1998 dated March 5, 1999 except for
Note 17, as to which the date is June 7, 1999, in Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-80131) and related Prospectus of Futech
Interactive Products, Inc.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
August 4, 1999
395 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

Eon. Homrr D. lFOk 

County Auditor 

Fapetto County 

La Grange, Texas 

a in addition 

a*ed the shsritf 

ion .whloh 1s as follows t 

whether or not an 

saoh oi thr foregoi~ two questions $a 

The only aosts whioh imy be taxed in delinquent t*i: 

sulto ore those speolr1oall.y ~rotidsd POT by statute. There 

ia no statute whloh authorizer a dollnquclnt tax attorqey whoa& 

contraot has exglred to tax as aoits a See for prspariaga 

tQX deed for tho sheriff, 
399 

non. Ronor I?. Sok, paga 2 

Llkewlse them ir m rtatuto ln exfotenoe rhlsh 

authorlztm -the ehorlff to hire an attorney to prepare the 

tax deed iOr bin and @how thla 88 M sqpanae Or OrflQ@ in 

addition to the $2.00 allowed tho sharlti for his mm~otm. 

Your attention la oalled to Art1010 7328, Vernon’8 

Rwired Civil Statute8 of Taxa+ whioh provide8 that In aaao 

tDa QrDQeFty ia sold by the rhor~fr to the State the 8hirr 

e&all m&e a deed to the 3tateg wing iormr ta ?m preoorlbed 

and furnhlwd br the Oomptrolhs rhowlng in eaoh oare the 

amount of taxos, interest, pudy fmd aoats for whloh @old, 

and the olork*# oortm 1or reoord~n& tIm doe&. Ho 18 irrrthor 

required by raid rtatub to aausa swh do& to br reoorded 

in thm roaord of deed8 by the 0ou.M.~ olerk of the oounty and 

w&en 60 reoorded aha2.X iorrrard the aam to the Corpptreller. 

In lnatanoee where the land i8 rold by thr 8horirt to t&e 

State in8iXnlOh as a form for tha drrd $8 Mod whioh 1s 

propared by tho CoPsgtroller, it ir ‘mldent that there would 

be no mason why the sherUT would be rorood to amploy an 

attorney to fill in t&is blank fo?& In the event tba 

i3lsarifr 00tid not riil ia auoh rorm and hit iorood to 

employ an attorney to fill tkr ton in for him, the expense 

or same uould h&v. to oome out or hla pinto purlbe* m&hermre, the atatutoe or Texas oontwuplgto that the aounty and/or 

dlstrlot atbornep mhall be the legal adrla0.r ot the rhrrirr 

aa well aa the other ooun8y oiflcer8) and as al1 oftioero are 

prmwmed to perform their duty it woulb appear that in the 

l ~ont the sherifr had airrioulty in l xeoutfiag a tax dead he 

Oould go ror legal adrioo to the poblio orriow whom duty 

it is to adtlso him in reganl to Buoh matters. 

TxusQing that we hare answorsd your questioh8 

fully, and assuring you that any th wo ofm be 0r turther 

asalatanoe to you you hare bu6 to OR11 won UII~ we are
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 91

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United

States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 2000

Mr. JENKINS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution

of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 91 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total expenditures for any fiscal year

3 shall not exceed total revenues for that fiscal year, unless

4 three-fifths of the whole number of each House of Con5 gress shall provide by law for a specific excess of expendi6 tures over revenues by a rollcall vote.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress may waive the provisions

8 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

9 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be

10 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is

11 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and

12 serious military threat to national security and is so de13 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the

14 whole number of each House, which becomes law.

15 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress shall enforce and imple16 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely

17 on estimates of outlays and receipts.

18 ‘‘SECTION 4. Total revenues shall include all receipts

19 of the United States Government except those derived

20 from borrowing. Total expenditures shall include all out21 lays of the United States Government except for those for

22 repayment of debt principal.
3

•HJ 91 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall take effect beginning

2 with the second fiscal year beginning after its ratifica3 tion.’’.

Æ
PO
      Box
      84013


Columbus
      GA 31908-4013


Tel.
      800.784.5566







March
      22,
      2006




LaSalle
      Bank, N.A.


Global
      Securities and Trust Services


Attn:
      Myron Mix


135
      S.
      LaSalle Street, Suite 1625


Chicago,
      IL 60603




Re:
      Annual Statement of Compliance for the Servicing Agreements listed on Exhibit
      A
      hereto (each as "Agreement") by GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as
      Servicer




Ladies
      and Gentlemen:




Pursuant
      to
      the Servicing Agreement with respect to the above-referenced offering, the undersigned
      officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. (as "Servicer") hereby certifies
      as
      to the following (capitalized terms have the meanings used in the Servicing
      Agreement):




1.  A
      review
      of the activities of the Servicer and its performance under the Servicing
      Agreement during
      the preceding fiscal year since the inception of the trust has been made under
      the direct supervision
      of the undersigned officer; and




2.  To
      the
      best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such review, the Servicer
      has fulfilled
      all of its material obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout the
      applicable period,
      and there has been no known default in the fulfillment of the Servicer's
      material obligations throughout
      such period, except as follows:


During
      the year, certain custodial bank account reconciliations were not prepared
      and reviewed
      on a timely basis. In addition, there are certain custodial bank accounts that
      have reconciling
      items that have not been resolved with 90 calendar days of their original
      identification. For
      the
      month ended December 31, 2005, all custodial bank reconciliations had been
      completed and reviewed on a timely basis.






Very
              truly yours,GREENPOINT MORTGAGEFUNDING, INC., as ServicerBy: /s/ Michael De FrancescoName: Michael De FrancescoTitle: Senior Vice PresidentLoan
              Administration




Aviso
      Importante Para Las Personas Habla Espanol Si usted no entiendo el contenido
      de
      esta carta por favor obtenga una traduccion immediamente




2300
      Brookstone Centre PJswy Columbus GA 31904 www.greerapoiffltservice.com
December 10, 1962

No. 67269.

protests 62/5246, 62/5247, and 62/5248.

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc., and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          49,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,125
<PP&E>                                          32,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,767
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           299
<OTHER-SE>                                     (39,337)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,317
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,829
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,114)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,654
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (37,684)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (42,859)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.44)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98808; File No. SR-C2-2023-020]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule Related to 
Physical Port Fees

October 27, 2023.
    On September 1, 2023, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
amend certain connectivity and port fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on September 20, 2023.\4\ On September 29, 2023, pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\5\ the Commission: (1) temporarily suspended 
the proposed rule change; and (2) instituted proceedings under Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On October 25, 2023, the 
Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-C2-2023-020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98397 (September 14, 
2023), 88 FR 64939.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98649, 88 FR 68859 
(October 4, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24173 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P