alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 23, 2003
                            WAYPOINT FINANCIAL CORP.
                            ------------------------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


Pennsylvania                            0-22399                25-1872581
------------                            -------                ----------
(State or Other Jurisdiction      (Commission File No.)      (I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation)                                           Identification No.)


235 N. Second Street, Harrisburg, PA                                    17101
---------------------------------------                                 -----
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                              (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (717) 236-4041



                                 Not Applicable
                                 --------------
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





<page>


ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4,  AND 6:     Not Applicable


ITEM 5.   Other Events
          ------------

          A. Waypoint Financial Announces Fourth Quarter Results and
             Increases Regular Quarterly Dividend


ITEM 7.   Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information, and Exhibits
          -------------------------------------------------------------------

          A.  Exhibit 99.1  - Press Release
                              -------------


<page>


                                   SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.



                                          WAYPOINT FINANCIAL CORP.



DATE:  January 23, 2003                         By: S//  James H. Moss
                                                    ------------------
                                                James H. Moss
                                                Executive Vice President
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### Henry *et al. vs.*McDaniel, governor.

Where a person enters into two recognizances for his appearance, one to answer an indictment for false swearing by affidavit, the other to answer an indictment for forging an affidavit, both recognizances may be enforced by judgment of forfeiture, whether the indictments relate to one and the same affidavit or not. Appearance of the accused is preliminary to the question of his actual guilt or innocence of either charge.

December 5, 1887.

Bonds. Forgery. False swearing. Practice in superior court. Before Judge Brown. Milton superior court. February term, 1887.

Reported in tbe decision.

W. M. Sessions and Hulsey & Bateman, for plaintiffs in error.

Geo. F. Gober, solicitor-general, *contra.*

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

There were two indictments against the same man, one for false swearing and the other for forgery. On each of these a recognizance was given by tbe same obligors, in the same sum, on the same day. Default of appearance occurred, and proceedings were taken for forfeiture. On return of the writs of *scire*facias, defence was made in one of the cases, the one relating to false swearing; which defence was put upon the grohnd that the same affidavit involved in that indictment was the subject-matter of the indictment for forgery. The substance of the objection was, that one and the same affidavit could not be a forgery and also embody a false oath actually taken. The court went into evidence upon the question as to whether there was one affidavit only, or two ; and after hearing the evidence, overruled the defence and rendered a judgment of *175forfeiture in each case ; and one of these judgments is the subject-matter of the present writ of error.

We hold that, where two indictments are pending against the same individual, one for false swearing and the other for forgery, whether predicated on the same affidavit or not, the party must comply with the terms of both recognizances ; and the question as to his guilt or innocence in either case is not involved upon the hearing of a *scire facias*to forfeit his recognizance. Whether a man be innocent or guilty, if he stands indicted and enters into a recognizance for his appearance, he must appear; it would be altogether premature and irrelevant to enter into the question of his guilt or innocence upon the preliminary matter of his appearance. No question was raised on the legal sufficiency of either indictment. The judge decided correctly; and that, too, altogether irrespective of the extrinsic evidence that was heard and considered. Upon the fqce of the proceedings, no other judgment than one of forfeiture could have been rendered in either case.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit
23.01





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-3 Nos. 333-111276 , 333-127222, 333-133344, and Form S-8 No. 333-139973), of
Convera Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March
27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Convera
Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
January 31, 2009.





/s/ ERNST & YOUNG
LLP








McLean,
Virginia


March 27,
2009
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-105258 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account Ten on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of
our report dated February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account Ten relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
Before the Third Division,

October 6, 1954

No. 58419.

protests 188528-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alfred Orlik, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*375Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Wm. 8. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. O. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
Document

Exhibit 10.47


Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC


February 23, 2021


Cheniere Marketing International LLP
3rd Floor, The Zig Zag Building
70 Victoria Street
London SW1E 6SQ, United Kingdom
Attn: Commercial Operations


Re:       Letter Agreement regarding the Base SPA (“Letter Agreement”)


Dear Sir or Madam:


The Parties have entered into that certain Amended and Restated LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement (FOB) dated August 5, 2014 between Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC and Cheniere Marketing International LLP (as assignee of Cheniere Marketing, LLC) (as amended and assigned, the “Base SPA”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Base SPA.  This Letter Agreement sets forth the terms of certain sales and purchases of LNG under the Base SPA.


The Parties hereby agree that, notwithstanding Section 9.2 and subject to Section 14 of the Base SPA, the FPC (expressed in USD per MMBtu) applicable to the following number of cargoes shall equal USD one decimal seventy-two per MMBtu (US$1.72/MMBtu):


(a)up to three (3) cargoes scheduled for delivery in the 2021 Contract Year;


(b)up to five (5) or six (6) cargoes scheduled for delivery in each of the 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 Contract Years, such number to be nominated by Buyer for each such Contract Year during the ADP process for the relevant Contract Year; and


(c)up to three (3) or four (4) cargoes scheduled for delivery in the 2026 Contract Year, such number to be nominated by Buyer during the ADP process for the 2026 Contract Year.


Please indicate Buyer’s agreement with the terms of this Letter Agreement by executing a copy of this Letter Agreement where indicated below and returning it to Seller. 


Sincerely,


Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC


						
	By:	/s/ Zach Davis
		Zach Davis
		Chief Financial Officer




700 Milam Street, Suite 1900, Houston, Texas 77002
+1 713-375-5000






Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC








Accepted and Agreed:
												
	Cheniere Marketing International LLP	
	acting by its managing member, Cheniere Marketing, LLC
				
	By:	/s/ Anatol Feygin	
		Anatol Feygin		
		Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer


700 Milam Street, Suite 1900, Houston, Texas 77002
+1 713-375-5000
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ALEXSAM, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
WILDCARD SYSTEMS, INC., EFUNDS CORPORATION, FIDELIT Y NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES , INC., Defendants

- Appellees

______________________
2017

- 1682

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:15

- cv

- 61736

- BB
, Judge Beth Bloom.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
W. L EE G RESHAM , III , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Birmingham, AL, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by J ACQUELINE K NAPP B URT , Atlanta, GA; S TEVEN W HITEFIELD R ITCHESON , Insight, Chatsworth, CA.

J AMES R. B ARNEY , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington
, DC argued for defendants

- appellees. Also represented by R OBERT B.C ASSADY ; J EFFREY A. B ERKOWITZ , Reston, VA ; R OBERT E RIC B ILIK , D ANIEL M. M AHFOOD , McGuireWoods LLP, Jacksonville, FL; D EBORAH S EGERS , Fidelity National Information Systems, Inc., Jacksonville, FL.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , B R YSON , and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
No. 52469.

protests 136193-K, etc. (New York).

#### Kaufman Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
S02A0641.

#### GRADY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. HICKERSON.

(571 SE2d 391)

Sears, Presiding Justice.

The appellant, the Grady County Board of Education (the Board), terminated the employment of the appellee, Michael Hickerson, as superintendent of the Grady County school system, and on review, an independent tribunal found that the termination was without cause. The Board failed to affirm or reverse the tribunal’s *581decision, and Hickerson filed this mandamus action seeking a ruling that the Board was required to make such a decision. The trial court agreed with Hickerson, and the Board has now filed this appeal.

Decided October 15, 2002.

*Lehman & Cauley, Thomas L. Lehman,*for appellant.

*Adams, Hemingway & Wilson, F. Bradford Wilson, Jr.,*for appellee.

Contrary to the Board’s contention, Hickerson had the right to file a mandamus action to seek to enforce the Board’s alleged obligations in this case.1 Moreover, having reviewed the record, we conclude that it supports the trial court’s ruling that the parties agreed to incorporate and use the procedures of OCGA § 20-2-940 for the purposes of Hickerson’s termination.2 In this regard, because the trial court interpreted the parties’ agreement to include those procedures, and because the trial court did not rule that they apply as a matter of law to disputes between superintendents and school systems, the trial court did not violate the directive of OCGA § 20-2-101 (f) that the terms and conditions of a superintendent’s employment by a school system are governed by the parties’ contract. Finally, because Hickerson must exhaust the administrative remedies made available to him under the contract before pursuing a claim in superior court,3 the trial court did not err in ordering the Board to issue a decision affirming or reversing the tribunal’s decision.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

*CCC Builders v. City Council of Augusta,*237 Ga. 589, 591 (229 SE2d 349) (1976).

2

 Those procedures include a requirement that, after an employment decision by a tribunal, a local board of education must issue a ruling on the tribunal’s decision within ten days of the board’s receipt of the transcript of the hearing before the tribunal. OCGA § 20-2-940 (f).

3

 See *Arp v. Bremen Bd. of Ed.,*171 Ga. App. 560 (320 SE2d 397) (1984).
No. 56919.

#### W. F. Mackay *v.*United States,

protest 116442-K (Pembina).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
No. 68636.

protest 63/7716 (New York).

#### The Electro Motive Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ceramic tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John H. Faunce, Philadelphia, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60358.

protests 264442-K, etc. (New York).

#### Associated Dry Goods Corp. (Lord & Taylor Div.) et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 55085.

#### McCabe Bros. Grain Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 117820-K (A), etc. (Duluth).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 57140.

protests 196546-K and 196547-K (New York).

#### Gaillet & Hartig Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to> those the subject of *Coughlin Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and *Gillette Safety Razor Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346). the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | _______________________________                                          |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Matthew                  A. Jones                                        |
| Title: | Chief                  Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | September                  5, 2007                                       |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                      1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN OF
                          SPEEDFAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.


         Pursuant to Section 15 of the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
SpeedFam International, Inc. (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended, effective
as of October 8, 1998, as follows:

         1.       Paragraph 10.(a) shall be amended by substituting "1,000,000"
                  for "500,000."

         2.       Section 11 shall be amended to read as follows:

                  Section 11. Administration. The Plan shall be administered by
         the Board of the Company or a committee of members of the Board
         appointed by the Board. The administration, interpretation or
         application of the Plan by the Board or its committee shall be final,
         conclusive and binding upon all participants. If a Committee is
         established to administer the Plan, the Committee shall consist solely
         of two or more members of the Board, each of whom shall qualify as a
         "non-employee director" to administer the Plan as contemplated by Rule
         16b-3, as amended, or other applicable rules under Section 16(b) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed by SpeedFam
International, Inc. on this 8th day of October, 1998.


                                             SPEEDFAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                             By /s/ James N. Farley         
                                                -------------------------
                                                Its: Chairman

Attest

  /s/ Charles A. Kelly      
         Secretary
Fw: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

RobertJ Wayland to

:

Mary Johnson 12/19/2012 05:32 PM 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/19/2012 05:32 PM -----

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/19/2012 05:29 PM

Subject: RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

Hi Jim,

Below are a couple of interagency comments that have come in today on this afternoon’s drafts:

Major Source Rule.

Page 198. For consistency with equation 10, we believe the symbols X1 and Y1 in equation 11 should be 

small x prime (small x with a bar over the top) and small y prime (small y with a bar over the top). 

(Rephrased version of comment that was submitted by the SSC on 18 December 2012.) As an aside, in 

equation 10, perhaps X1 and Y1 should be Xi and Yi since it is a summation equation from i to n.

Area Source Rule. 

Consider revising the definitions of 10-day rolling average and 30-day rolling average in the area source 

rule to be consistent with the major source rule to incorporate the 240 hour and 720 hour of valid 

operating data criteria, respectively. Both rules should probably exclude hours during startup and 

shutdown as well as unit down time, from the rolling average calculations. 

Regards,

Cortney

From: Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:50 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

Cortney,

Please replace the redline version I sent you earlier this afternoon with this version. A few edits were 

made to the fourth year language on pages 26 -28.

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP for Major Sources Industrial, Commercial, and 

Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters 2060 121912 redline w 121312v2.docx)
Jim

_______________

James A. Eddinger

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

919-541-5426
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutraceutical International Corporation (the "Company") for
the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank W. Gay II, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



/s/ FRANK W. GAY II Frank W. Gay II Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer


Date:
July 29, 2010

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutraceutical International Corporation (the "Company") for
the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cory J. McQueen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



/s/ CORY J. MCQUEEN Cory J. McQueen Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Date:
July 29, 2010

Signed
originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 73 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.73

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-62 is 
further amended by striking ``October 29, 1999'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``November 5, 1999'', and by striking ``$189,524,382'' in 
section 119 and inserting ``$288,903,248''. Public Law 106-46 is 
amended by striking ``November 1, 1999'' and inserting ``November 5, 
1999''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```