alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                  EXHIBIT 12(A)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        13 WEEKS
                                                         ENDED
                                                       10/2/2004                                      YEAR ENDED
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)                         (UNAUDITED)       2004         2003          2002        2001
                                                      ------------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
Fixed Charges
   Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs
    on all indebtedness                               $     13,038    $  40,192    $  41,008    $  43,357    $  39,043
   Add interest element implicit in rentals                    894        3,557        3,807        3,040        3,724
                                                      ------------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
        Total fixed charges                           $     13,932    $  43,749    $  44,815    $  46,397    $  42,767
(Loss) Income
   (Loss) Income before income taxes                  $     (3,280)   $(100,387)   $  10,916    $  44,541    $  73,846
    Add fixed charges                                       13,932       43,749       44,815       46,397       42,767
                                                      ------------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
   (Loss) Income before fixed charges and income
    taxes                                             $     10,652    $ (56,638)   $  55,731    $  90,938    $ 116,613
                                                      ============    =========    =========    =========    =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                            0.76        (1.29)        1.24         1.96         2.73
</TABLE>
No. 58406.

protests 179728-K, etc. (New York).

#### Harold A. Sothern et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Harold A. Sothern*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 216, C. D. 1605), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Order entered December 28, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01347-CR

JUAN MANUEL PALLARES-RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA13-22517-G

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On November 10, 2015, we denied court reporter Trisha Phillips’s request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record and ordered the trial court to make findings. We 

ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant is indigent; (2) there was some confusion in forwarding 

appellant’s notice of appeal to the appellate court; and (3) appellant is entitled to proceed without 

payment for the reporter’s record.

We ORDER court reporter Trisha Phillips to file the complete reporter’s record, 

including all exhibits admitted into evidence, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Trisha Phillips, official court 

reporter, County Criminal Court No. 6, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      40,018,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,281,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     130,463,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (252,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             215,010,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     36,283,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          213,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       326,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 160,455,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               215,010,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,343,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  739,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             311,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                604,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   241,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            363,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   363,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
| Name of Subsidiary                      |   | Organized Under Laws of |   | Business Names     |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                                    |   |                    |   |               |
| Boardwalk      Operating GP, LLC        |   | Delaware                |   |               |
| Boardwalk      Pipelines, LP            |   | Delaware                |   |               |
| Texas      Gas Transmission, LLC        |   | Delaware                |   | Texas      Gas     |
| Gulf      South Pipeline Company, LP    |   | Delaware                |   | Gulf      South    |
| GS      Pipeline Company, LLC           |   | Delaware                |   |               |
| Gulf      Crossing Pipeline Company LLC |   | Delaware                |   | Gulf      Crossing |
Before the Third Division,

July 17, 1947

No. 51847.

#### Hammer Co. *v.*United States,

protest 122764-K (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrels numbered 9, 16, and, 39, was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit
32.1






Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350
  In connection with the filing of
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Report”) by Fund.com Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:
  1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and
  2.       The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.
     /s/ Gregory Webster
      /s/ Michael Hlavsa
     A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 has been provided to Fund.com , Inc. and will be retained by Fund.com,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Before the Second Division,

March 5, 1968

No. P68/107.

protest 58/15061 (New York).

#### Freedman & Slater, Inc., a/c Robert Bosch Corp. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of spark plugs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lodge Spark Plug Co.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 158, C.D. 2379), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0478

Docket Number

2012-SW-092-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Agusta Bollettino Tecnico (BT) No. 109-134, BT No. 109EP-121, BT No. 109S48, BT No. 109K-54, and BT No. 109SP-051, all dated September 21, 2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAMONT STERLING JOHNSON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-16197

D.C. No. 4:07-cv-04483-PJH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: REINHARDT, NOONAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

1. Petitioner Lamont Johnson seeks habeas relief on the ground that the

government destroyed material exculpatory evidence in violation of his due

process rights. See Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 57–58 (1988); California

v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 488–89 (1984). To prevail on this claim, Johnson

FILED

NOV 26 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
must show that the government failed to preserve constitutionally material

evidence. See Youngblood, 488 U.S. at 56–57; Trombetta, 467 U.S. at 489. 

Constitutionally material means that the exculpatory value of the evidence was

apparent before it was destroyed, and that the evidence was “of such a nature that

the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonably

available means.” Trombetta, 467 U.S. at 489.

The California Court of Appeal found, as a factual matter, that Johnson had

received “everything of an exculpatory nature.” We cannot say this finding was

based on “an unreasonable determination of the facts” in light of the record before

the state court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2). By the time of his second trial, Johnson

had access to the press releases that the State withheld and the witnesses who

appear to have been the source of the information contained in the press releases. 

Johnson has not identified any other evidence that might have existed suggesting

that a third person was in fact present at the murder scene. In light of the state

court’s factual determination, we cannot say that it unreasonably applied

Trombetta and Youngblood when it denied Johnson relief. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(d)(1); Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770, 786 (2011).

2. We also reject Johnson’s claim regarding the prosecution’s use of

inconsistent factual theories in the trials of Johnson and his co-defendant. No

Page 2 of 3
Supreme Court precedent clearly establishes that the Due Process Clause bars the

government from prosecuting co-defendants under inconsistent factual theories

absent evidence that the prosecutor knowingly used false evidence or acted in bad

faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). There is no evidence of either here.

AFFIRMED.

Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


In connection with this Annual Report of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)  for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathy Willard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 30, 2015By:/s/ Kathy WillardKathy WillardChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Todd Myers, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2006   /s/ Todd Myers    Chief Financial Officer
PA

NJ

NY

ME

NH VT

MA

CT RI

ND

SD

NE

KS

MN

IA

MO

IL

WI

IN

OH

MI

Census Regions and Divisions of the United States

TX

OK

AR

LA

MS AL

GA

FL

SC

TN

NC

KY

WV

VA

MD

DC

DE

EAST

NORTH

CENTRAL

MIDDLE

ATLANTIC

SOUTH

ATLANTIC EAST

SOUTH

CENTRAL

WEST

SOUTH

CENTRAL

WEST

NORTH

CENTRAL

200 400 Miles

MT

WY

ID

UT

CO

NM

AZ

MOUNTAIN

WEST MIDWEST NORTHEAST

SOUTH

ommerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau Prepared by the Geography Division

LEGEND

NEW

ENGLAND

REGIONDIVISION

STATE
U.S. Census Bureau

Census Bureau Regions and Divisions with State FIPS Codes

Region I: Northeast

Region 2: Midwest*

Region 3: South

Region 4: West

Division I: 

New England Division 2: 

Middle Atlantic

Division 3: 

East North Central	

Division 4: 

West North Central

Division 5: 

South Atlantic

Division 6: 

East South Central

Division 7: 

West South Central

Division 9: 

Pacific

*Prior to June 1984, the Midwest Region was designated as the North Central Region.

Arizona	 ( 04)

Colorado	(08)

Idaho	 (16)

New Mexico	(35)

Montana	(30)

Utah	 (49)

Nevada (32)

Wyoming (56)

Division 8: 

Mountain

Delaware	(10)

District of Columbia	(11)

Florida 	(12)

Georgia	(13)

Maryland 	(24)

North Carolina (37)

South Carolina (45)

Virginia (51)

West Virginia	 (54)

Alaska 	(02)

California	(06)

Hawaii	 (15)

Oregon	 (41)

Washington	(53)

Alabama	(01)

Kentucky	(21)

Mississippi	(28)

Tennessee	(47)

Arkansas	(05)

Louisiana	(22)

Oklahoma	(40)

Texas	 (48)

Indiana (18)

Illinois (17)

Michigan	(26)

Ohio (	39)

Wisconsin	(55)

Iowa	 (19) 	 Nebr aska	(31)

Kansas 	(20) 	Nor th Dakota	(38)

Minnesota	(27) South Dak ota	(46)

Missouri	(29)

Connecticut	(09)

Maine 	(23)

Massachusetts (25)

New Hampshire 	(33)

Rhode Island 	(44)

Vermont 	(50) 	 

New Jersey	(34)

New York	(36)

Pennsylvania	(42)
Exhibit 13.1

 

Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of QI Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven R. Garman, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)         The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: December 30, 2005 

 
|   |   | “Steven R. Garman”                                              Name: Steven R. Garman Title: President and Principal Executive Officer |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

----
No. 54520.

#### The Otto Gerdau Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 52583-K, etc. (San Francisco, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for each of the following insured depository institutions, was charged with the duty of winding up the affairs of the former institutions and liquidating all related assets. The Receiver has fulfilled its obligations and made all dividend distributions required by law. Notice of Termination of Receiverships
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Termination
                             date10047
FirstCity Bank
Stockbridge
GA
11/01/202310055
First Bank of Idaho, FSB
Ketchum
ID
11/01/202310058
Citizens Community Bank
Ridgewood
NJ
11/01/202310064
Bank of Lincolnwood
Lincolnwood
IL
11/01/202310100
Community Bank of Nevada
Las Vegas
NV
11/01/202310217
Tamalpais Bank
San Rafael
CA
11/01/202310224
Wheatland Bank
Naperville
IL
11/01/202310333
First Community Bank
Taos
NM
11/01/202310363
The Park Avenue Bank
Valdosta
GA
11/01/202310396
Bank of The Commonwealth
Norfolk
VA
11/01/202310434
Bank of The Eastern Shore
Cambridge
MD
11/01/2023
 The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary, including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments, and deeds. Effective on the termination dates listed above, the Receiverships have been terminated, the Receiver has been discharged, and the Receiverships have ceased to exist as legal entities. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819.) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on November 1, 2023. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2023-24453 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00325-CV

J. G., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY 

NO. C2021-0046C, THE HONORABLE DEBORAH WIGINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant J. G. filed his notice of appeal on June 1, 2022. The appellate record was 

complete on June 22, 2022, making appellant’s brief due on July 12, 2022. On July 8, 2022, 

counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from 

suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days for 

court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order James B. Peplinski to file 

appellant’s brief no later than August 1, 2022. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be 

required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on July 15, 2022.
2

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly