alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 50297.

#### Protest 107412-K of Mrs. Helen H. Rasmussen (Laredo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Government counsel moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. An examination of the record showed that the protest was filed prior to liquidation. The motion to dismiss under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, was therefore granted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey
Staszak, Chief Executive Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2. The information contained in the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the
3rdday of November, 2010.



| |  |     |  |                                        
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey Staszak                    
| |  |     |  | Jeffrey Staszak Chief Executive Officer

This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Human Pheromone Sciences, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William P. Horgan and Gregory S. Fredrick certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ William P. Horgan

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 13, 2009



/s/ Gregory S. Fredrick

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

August 13, 2009





This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Human Pheromone Sciences, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.











25
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark Jarvis, of Hard Creek Nickel Corporation,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 20-F of Hard Creek Nickel
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hard
Creek Nickel Corporation.

Dated: April 30, 2015



Mark
JarvisMark Jarvis Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

---
No. 57887.

protests 186962-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Danwill Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content Under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
No. 53394.

protests 108746-K, etc. (Boston).

#### M. S. Walker, Inc. *v.*United States,

*133Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## EPA ICR No. 2488.01; Attachment J April 3, 2013

Attachment J : Page 1 

## EDSP Mock

- up Screenshots

The Agency will require Order Recipients to submit completed study profiles, supporting data, and all related correspondence electronically using the EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX), the point of entry on the Environmental Information Exchange Network (Exchange Network) for environmental submissions to the Agency.

This attachment provides screenshots of the front

- end industry user interface for the following work flows:

• Individual 90

- Day Response

• Individual Post

- 90

- Day Response

• Consortium Initial Response

• Consortium Post

- Initial Response

• Voluntary Submission

EPA is in the process of finalizing the electronic system design and intends to pilot test it before issuing any new EDSP Tier 1 Orders.

# TDD 9.21 OPPT MTS EDSP Mock

- up Screenshots

April 03, 2013

# Screenshots Included

• 

# Individual 90

- Day Response

• 

# Individual Post

- 90

- Day Response

• 

# Consortium Initial Response

• 

# Consortium Post

- Initial Response

• 

# Voluntary Submission

2

# Frontend Industry User Interface

– Individual 90

- Day Response

34567891011121314151617181920

# Frontend Industry User Interface

– Individual Post

- 90

- Day Response

21222324252627282930313233343536

# Frontend Industry User Interface

– Consortium Initial Response

373839404142434445464748

# Frontend Industry User Interface

- Consortium Post

Initial Response

49505152535455565758596061626364

# Frontend Industry User Interface

– Voluntary Submission

6566676869707172737475
Order entered January 11 , 2023

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 01045

- CR

DERRICK WALTON

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17

- 41375

O RDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief is

GRANTED , and we ORDER the brief filed on or before JANUARY 17, 2023.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUST ICE
No. 53900.

#### M. B. Daniels & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 151732-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 68621.

protests 60/27312, 60/26082, and 61/7634 (New York).

#### The Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In -accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Salem Communications Corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge: · the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  · the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: November 9, 2009By: /s/ EDWARD G. ATSINGER IIIEdward G. Atsinger IIIChief Executive Officer
# L_2022275EN.01005001.xml

| 25.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 275/50

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/2043

of 24 October 2022

implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 of 1 October 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi (1), and in particular Article 13(4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2015/1755. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2015/1755.

| (2) | On the basis of a review by the Council, three persons should be removed from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/1755. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review by the Council, three persons should be removed from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures, as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/1755.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 24 October 2022.

For the Council

The President

A. HUBÁČKOVÁ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 257, 2.10.2015, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 (List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 2), the following entries are deleted:

| — | entry 1 (Godefroid BIZIMANA); |
| --- | --- |

—

entry 1 (Godefroid BIZIMANA);

| — | entry 2 (Gervais NDIRAKOBUCA alias NDAKUGARIKA); |
| --- | --- |

—

entry 2 (Gervais NDIRAKOBUCA alias NDAKUGARIKA);

| — | entry 4 (Léonard NGENDAKUMANA). |
| --- | --- |

—

entry 4 (Léonard NGENDAKUMANA).

---
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group Corp.
on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending  December  31,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Xiali Gan,  Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report  complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


February 12, 2008

                                            By: /s/ Xiali Gan
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Xiali Gan,CFO and Chief
                                               Accounting Officer
No. 49892.

#### Protests 935784-G, etc., of Royal Bead Novelty Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that certain items consist of beads wholly or in chief value of glass similar to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867) the court held certain of the items as set out in schedule attached to decision to be dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 as claimed.
Exhibit 31

           CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE SERVICER WITH FORM 10-K

                                  Certification

            I, Kevin Cloyd, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Carrington
Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-NC4, Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.


                                        NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Cloyd
                                        Title: Executive Vice President
                                        Date: 3/29/06
 Includes batch loaded cold cleaning, repair 

and maintenance cleaning, flushing, 

handwipe operations

 Water-based cleaners are best alternatives for 

batch loaded cold cleaning and repair and 

maintenance cleaning

› Range of different types of equipment

› Heat water cleaner to 105 degrees F

› Use neutral cleaner which will be safe for hands

 Can use water followed by hot air, nitrogen or 

acetone or other VOC solvent for flushing 

 Can use acetone or other VOC solvent for 

handwipe

 IRTA project involved working on four 

different applications

› Brake cleaning

› General purpose degreasing

› Carburetor and fuel injection system cleaning

› Engine degreasing

 Water-based cleaners difficult to use in 

aerosol form

› Tend to foam

› IRTA worked with one supplier who was able to 

develop a few formulations that did not foam
 Best alternatives for brake cleaning and 

general purpose degreasing are waterbased brake cleaning systems or waterbased cleaners in spray bottles

› IRTA also developed two different solvent 

blends and packaged them in aerosol cans

 Carburetor and fuel injection system 

cleaning

› IRTA developed blend of acetone and soy 

and packaged it in aerosol cans
 Engine degreasing

› Detailers routinely use water-based cleaning 

systems

› Can use high pressure water systems or 

water-based cleaners in spray bottles

 IRTA tested alternative propellants

› Nitrogen oxide did not work

› Carbon dioxide very good high pressure 

propellant and lower in cost than 

hydrocarbon propellants

 Film cleaning

› Can use ethyl alcohol or IPA

 Other degreasing formulations

› Can reformulate to remove TCE

 Others?
Dr. Katy Wolf

Institute for Research and 

Technical Assistance (IRTA)

8579 Skyline Drive

Los Angeles, CA 90046

Phone (323)656-1121

Cell (818) 371-9260 

Fax (818) 656-1122

kwolf.irta@earthlink.net

www.irta.us
Before the First Division,

October 29, 1953

No. 57565.

#### S. H. Kress & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 983337-G, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Patricia Gallup, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                      |  |  |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Patricia Gallup              
|                      |  |  |  | Patricia Gallup                     
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00331-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J. AND A.R.,

MINOR CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Wichita County (12928-JR-A)

February 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 22-40190

Randall T. Greenough,

Plaintiff—Appellant ,

versus

Sharilla Gray,

Defendant—Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:21-CV-75

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *
Randall T. Greenough, an inmate conf ined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for default judgment.
We previously remanded this case to the distri ct court for the limited purpose of clarifying whether a final judgment had issued. On August 29, 2023, the district court clarified that al though it had previo usly entered final

* This order is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 7, 2023
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40190 Document: 00516886598 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2023No. 22-40190

2 judgment in Greenough’s case, it had since granted Greenough’s motion to alter or amend judgment, which reinstat ed the case on the court’s active docket. Accordingly, this court lack s jurisdiction over this appeal. See Adult Film Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Thetford , 776 F.2d 113, 115 (5th Cir. 1985) (holding that orders denying default judgment ar e not subject to interlocutory appeal).

This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Further, Greenough’s outstanding motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot, as the opinion on which Greenough seeks rehearing has already been
withdrawn. Case: 22-40190 Document: 00516886598 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/07/2023
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 1319 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 143

-AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet


### Replace IP8 Bleed System 16.0 $1,360.0 0 $75,000 $76,360.00 55 $4,199,800.0 0 

### Upgrade AEDB 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 55 $ 4,675.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 4,204,475 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs tab le that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : AEDB software

### cost has not been provided. Cost of upgrade to AIMS to v14 is not included and may have been done

previously. **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska wh ere aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO

* 

### Explanation :