alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Gina Screen – Acting Director 

Office of Congressional Affairs and Communication (OCAC)

As the Acting Director of OCAC, Screen oversees contact and coordination with 

all external parties – including members of the public, the media, Congress, 

stakeholders, and other government agencies – and with the FHFA workforce.

Before joining FHFA, Screen served as the Deputy Executive Director of the 

Office of Communications at the Veterans Health Administration in the U.S. 

Department of Veterans Affairs. There she managed the planning and execution 

of strategic communications initiatives for VHA, the nation’s largest integrated 

health care system. 

She has also served as a Senior Communications Advisor for the Government National Mortgage Association 

(Ginnie Mae), where she managed strategic communications efforts to enhance visibility of Ginnie Mae in the 

mortgage finance industry. 

Screen was a producer at WTTG-TV in Washington, DC, the Fox News Channel and America’s Black 

Forum, a nationally syndicated public affairs program. She has received three National Capital Region Emmy 

Award nominations and two NAACP Image Award nominations. Screen earned her Bachelor of Science 

degree from Syracuse University.
No. 57151.

protest 187745-K (New York).

#### U. S. A. International Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the ease the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|   |                    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Jonathan Snyder     |   |
|   | Jonathan Snyder         |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | Date: March 30, 2011    |   |

 

----
No. 50797.

#### Petition 6470-R of Norman G. Jensen (Pembina).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the broker making the entry testified that -the goods came in by train, and entry was made at once so as to allow the shipment to proceed to its destination; that the value as entered was on the basis of -the invoice value which was substantiated by the shipper; and that immediately after entry an inquiry was forwarded to the shipper as to the value, an amended •entry being filed upon reply. However, the appraiser advanced the values over the entered value. An appeal for a reappraisement was taken and the court found .a value higher than the amended entered value but lower than the value returned by the appraiser. From all the circumstances appearing herein the court Was of the opinion that the petitioner used due diligence in determining the value at which •entry should be made and was without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or to misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore .granted.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                              MEDAPHIS CORPORATION

                    COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED
                          PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
                     (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   THREE MONTHS                                
                                                                       ENDED            NINE MONTHS ENDED      
                                                                   SEPTEMBER 30,          SEPTEMBER 30,        
                                                                   -------------          -------------        
 DESCRIPTION                                                     1996        1995       1996        1995       
 -----------                                                     ----        ----       ----        ----       
 <S>                                                           <C>          <C>      <C>           <C>         
 PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED                                                                                     
 Weighted average shares outstanding during the period            71,665      57,696     71,123      55,962     
 .....................................................                                                 
 Shares issuable upon assumed exercise of stock options,                                                
   less amounts assumed repurchased under the treasury        
   stock method.......................................                --          --         --          --    
                                                               ---------     -------   --------     -------
Total weighted average common stock and common                                                                
  stock equivalents outstanding during the period.....            71,665      57,696     71,123      55,962    
                                                               =========     =======   ========     =======
 Pro forma net income (loss)..........................         $ (36,370)    $(2,723)  $(19,954)    $(7,354)   
                                                               =========     =======   ========     =======
 Pro forma net income (loss) per common share.........         $   (0.51)     $(0.05)    $(0.28)     $(0.13)   
                                                               =========     =======   ========     =======
</TABLE>
No. P68/123.

protest 66/78021 (New York).

#### William Adams, Inc. *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of various decorated glassware items similar in all material respects to those the subject of *William Adams, Inc.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 429, C.D. 2670), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68622.

protests 61/14397, etc. (New York).

#### All-World Trading & Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

April 19, 1962

No. 66701.

#### Century Lighting, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/10137 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

| (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                         |                                         |                               |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                         |                                         |
|                                    |                                    |                          |
| Date: September                28, 2006 | By:                                | /s/ Bruce                Hahn |
|                                         | Bruce                Hahn                    |
|                                         | Chief                Executive Officer  |

|         |                                                          |                                     |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                          |
|    |                                                     |                                |
|         | By:                                                 | /s/ Bruce                    Layman |
|         | Bruce                    Layman                               |
|         | Chief                    Financial                    Officer |
S03Y0027.

#### IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW W. WALLACE.

(571 SE2d 388)

Per Curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Respondent Matthew W. Wallace’s Petition for Voluntary Discipline filed pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2) prior to the issuance of a Formal Complaint. In his petition, Wallace admits violating Standards 4 (a lawyer shall not engage in professional conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or wilful misrepresentation) and 44 (a lawyer shall not without just cause to the detriment of his client in effect wilfully abandon or wilfully disregard a legal matter entrusted to him) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) and seeks the imposition of a two-year suspension. The maximum penalty for a violation of either Standard 4 or 44 is disbarment. The State Bar recommends that the Court accept Wallace’s petition.

Wallace, who has been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1991, admits that he represented a corporation in two separate suits pending in the Superior Court of Chatham County, Georgia; that in each case, the other parties in the litigation served written discovery on him as counsel of record for the corporation; that he in effect wilfully disregarded the discovery requests and failed to file or serve answers or responses to the discovery; and that, as a consequence, the corporation’s pleadings were struck and a default judgment entered in each case. Wallace also admits that he wilfully misrepresented to the corporation’s owner the status of the litigation, the necessity of responding to the discovery, and the prior orders compelling answers or responses to the discovery requests. Wallace states that the corporation subsequently initiated a malpractice action against him which he settled by payment of monetary damages.

We conclude that by his conduct in this matter, Wallace violated Standards 4 and 44 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) and that a two-year suspension is the appropriate sanction. In mitigation of discipline, we note that Wallace cooperated with disciplinary authorities, has no disciplinary record, and is extremely remorseful for having violated the disciplinary rules. Accordingly, we accept Wallace’s petition and he is *630hereby suspended from the practice of law in Georgia for two years. Wallace is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Decided October 15, 2002.

*Beltran & Associates, Douglas V. Chandler,*for Wallace.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W. Hewett, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Geor-

*Two-year suspension.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 13, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-13-1999
<CASH>                                           2,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,365
<PP&E>                                         120,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,756
<BONDS>                                        118,348
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                     50,846
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                    (51,028)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,686
<SALES>                                         11,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,963
<CGS>                                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,588)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,588)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (237.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Balance Sheet
or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>


</TABLE>
H. Res. 600 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 2, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 849) to 

repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory 

Board. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided among and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce and the chair and ranking minority member of the 
2 

•HRES 600 EH 

Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
(Reap. Dec. 10629)

#### New Yokr Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 18624, etc.

(Decided November 27, 1963)

*Stein & Shostalc*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed on tbe schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases which is incorporated herein that on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values plus the f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Gases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54621 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress which is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the footwear covered by the entries, the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, is unlike any articles manufactured or produced in the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reap-praisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and bold export value, as tliat value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein *471involved and that such, values were the invoice unit values, plus the f .o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the Third Division,

November 15, 1956

No. 60356.

protests 242152-K, etc. (New York).

#### Canada Packers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that an allowance was made for gelatinous substance on certain canned hams and similar pork products equal to 10 percent of the contents of the tins, whereas there should have been an allowance of 20 percent, and that, following a Bureau of Customs ruling, had the review period not expired, the collector would have made an allowance equal to 20 percent. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Axel Stokby et al.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358), the merchandise was held dutiable at *Syi*cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the tins, less an allowance for gelatinous substance equal to 20 percent of the contents of each tin.
No. 64732.

#### Tip Top Brush Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33557 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64724.

#### Air Clearance Association, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33800 (New York).

*324Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 60357.

protests 263451-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros., a Div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*420Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 63513.

protest 268083-K (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Travel Group (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yizhao Zhang,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Yizhao ZhangYizhao
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer