alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50591

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jairin Antonio Rodezno-Guevara, also known as Jairin 

Guevara, also known as Jarin Guevara, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:20-CR-43-1

Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jairin Antonio Rodezno-Guevara appeals the 21-month sentence 

imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being found unlawfully in the 

United States following a previous removal. He argues that the recidivism 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 29, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50591 Document: 00515687797 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/29/2020
No. 20-50591

2

enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it allows 

a sentence above the otherwise applicable statutory maximum based on facts 

that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a 

reasonable doubt. Rodezno-Guevara correctly concedes that his argument is 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he 

raises the issue to preserve it for further possible review. See United States v. 

Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 

492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). 

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance and, alternatively, seeks an extension of time to file its brief. 

Because the issue is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See 

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time 

to file a brief is DENIED as moot, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-50591 Document: 00515687797 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/29/2020
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 85

JOINT RESOLUTION

Appointing the day for the convening of the second

session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 85

JOINT RESOLUTION

Appointing the day for the convening of the second session

of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HJ 85 EH

1 SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF SECOND SESSION OF

2 ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS.

3 The second regular session of the One Hundred Sixth

4 Congress shall begin at noon on Monday, January 24,

5 2000.

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SESSION PRIOR TO CONVENING.

7 If the Speaker of the House of Representatives and

8 the Majority Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after con9 sultation with the Minority Leader of the House of Rep10 resentatives and the Minority Leader of the Senate, deter11 mine that it is in the public interest for the Members of

12 the House of Representatives and the Senate to reassem13 ble prior to the convening of the second regular session

14 of the One Hundred Sixth Congress as provided in section

15 1—

16 (1) the Speaker and Majority Leader shall so

17 notify their respective Members; and

18 (2) Congress shall reassemble at noon on the

19 second day after the Members are so notified.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Before the Third Division,

March 5, 1968

No. P68/110.

protests 66/11994, etc. (New York).

#### Miya Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of stone lanterns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Otagiri Mercantile Co., Inc.,*and *Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 184, C.D. 2173), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-80;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006By:       /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
H. J. Res. 117

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘October 28, 2000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 56247.

protests 958206-G and 975694-G (Los Angeles).

#### The Attorney General as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Steven S. Myers, as Chief Executive Officer of
SM&A (the Company) hereby certify that, based on my knowledge: 1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 12, 2005
    
    /s/ STEVEN S. MYERSSteven S. MyersChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2013

No. 04-12-00816-CV

Daniel A. BASS,

Appellant

v.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-19911

The Honorable Mollee Bennett Westfall, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's second request for reporter's record is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of August, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies, in all      material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of thecompany. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 | /s/      Gao Ren                          |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:                | Gao      Ren                              |   |
| Title:               | Chief      Executive Officer and Chairman |   |
|                 |                                      |   |
| August      17, 2010 |                                      |
|                 |                                      |
|                 | /s/      Qi Shaofeng                      |   |
| Name:                | Qi      Shaofeng                          |   |
| Title:               | Chief      Financial Officer              |   |
|                 |                                      |   |
| August      17, 2010 |                                      |

----
No. P66/374.

No. P66/375.

#### ACEC Electric Corp. et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/21717, etc. (New York). ACEC Electric Corp. et al. *v.*United States, protests 64/9194, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered -by the foregoing protests consists of sewing machine motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *ACEC Electric Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 138, C.D. 2563), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
!

!

!

!

! ! !!

! !

!

! !

!

2008 NSDI CAP Awards

Base data courtesy of the National Atlas of the United States®

Fairfax

Alexandria

June 17, 2008

Project Categories

3: Fifty States Initiative (8)

6: Standards Implementation Assistance and Outreach (4)

5: Building data stewardship for The National Map and the NSDI (4)

2: Best Practices in Geospatial Service Oriented Architecture (3)

1: Metadata Trainer and Outreach Assistance (4)

Flagstaff

Sonoma

Oklahoma City

Ames

St. Paul

Cleveland

Raleigh

Mogantown

Indianapolis

Towson

Leesburg

Missoula

IDAHO

COLORADO

NEBRASKA

GEORGIA

SOUTH

CAROLINA

PENNSYLVANIA

HAWAII

US VIRGIN

ISLANDS

!

!

!

!

!(!(

Burlington

! 4: Canadian and United States Spatial Data Infrastructure Project (1)
Before the First Division,

January 28, 1948

No. 52138.

protest 981405-G (New York).

#### Herman Weber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hard-rubber dust the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Herman Weber*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 190) the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b) was sustained.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit: 10.4T

SECURITY INTEREST AGREEMENT (#4)                                 August 20, 1991

WHEREAS the Trudy Corp of 165 Water Street in Norwalk, Ct. (hereafter "Trudy")
is seeking to pay various operating expenses including payment of property and
income taxes, and

WHEREAS the Trudy Corp needs additional cash, and has to date been unable to
secure financing from other sources, and

WHEREAS William W. Burnham (hereafter "Burnham") of White Oak Shade Road in New
Canaan, Ct. is willing to assist Trudy Corp by lending Trudy Corp $30,000
(thirty thousand dollars) via his check # 855 for deposit into the Company's
account 820-817-414,

NOW THEREFORE, Trudy Corp agrees to provide a security interest to Burnham in
recognition of the value he is providing the Company and the risks inherent
therein. Given that this cash is necessary for the company to survive, that cash
has great value to Trudy.

Trudy agrees to give Burnham a collateral interest in all Cash or Securities,
all Accounts Receivable both of Trudy and its subsidiary, Soundprints, all
inventory of whatever kind, and all furniture and fixtures. This security
interest shall be limited to the amount referred to above, plus imputed interest
of 12% per annum.

Burnham shall be entitled to perfect his security interest, if and when, Trudy
is unable to repay this debt on its maturity on November 1, 1991. In such
circumstances, Burnham shall have a collateral interest second only to that of
Union Trust (if any), but in any event senior to all trade creditors and to all
other liabilities of the Company unless otherwise stated or stipulated by
legislation.

Both parties agree that there may be partial reductions under this agreement as
goods are imported and paid for by Trudy; the collateral interest shall be
reduced pro rata

AGREED:  /s/ Peter P. Ogilvie              ACCEPTED:  /s/ William W. Burnham
         ----------------------                       ----------------------
         Peter P. Ogilvie                             William W. Burnham 9/16/91
         for Trudy Corp
No. 62938.

#### Empacadora Trevino, S.A. *v.*United States,

protests 241294-K, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. S. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 23

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Cape Fear Bank Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-133533 on Form S-8 of Cape Fear Bank Corporation of our report dated
March 20, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cape Fear Bank Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Cape Fear Bank Corporation.

LOGO

Greenville, North Carolina

March 29, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 376 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 376

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding support for the 
                     recognition of a Liberty Day.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 376

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas our rights and liberties are rooted in the cherished documents that gave 
        birth to our nation, those being the Declaration of Independence and the 
        United States Constitution with its Bill of Rights;
Whereas the patriot James Madison, fourth President of the United States, was 
        the major author of the Virginia Plan, the model and the basis for that 
        United States Constitution that emerged from the Constitutional 
        Convention in 1787;
Whereas James Madison kept detailed written records of the debates and 
        compromises that were in integral part of that Convention of 1787, which 
        records were published only after the death of all delegates to the 
        Convention;
Whereas James Madison wrote many of the newspaper articles now known as the 
        Federalist Papers, outlining why States should endorse the new 
        Constitution and enduring as some of the best arguments for our form of 
        government;
Whereas James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights into the 1st Congress of the 
        United States, whereupon the first ten amendments to the Constitution 
        were adopted; and
Whereas it is altogether fitting that the 16th day of March, the birthday of the 
        distinguished founding father, James Madison, would serve as a fitting 
        reminder of Liberty Day, a celebration of the Declaration of 
        Independence and the United States Constitution, where our unalienable 
        rights and liberties are enumerated: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a Liberty Day should be celebrated each year in the 
        United States as a remembrance of both the freedom that 
        Americans were given in the Declaration of Independence and the 
        extraordinary rights and liberties that Americans were given in 
        their Constitution; and
            (2) all elected and previously-elected representatives of 
        the people who voluntarily give of their time to speak to 
        Americans about those founding documents, in furtherance of 
        that remembrance of our freedom, our rights and our liberties, 
        deserve our thanks.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. P68/118.

protests 58/17849, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Gross Plumbing & Rubber Company et al. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of flat sink strainers and replacement cup sink strainers in chief value of brass the same in all material respects as those the subject of Davies, *Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 53392.

protests 77002-K, etc. (New York)

#### 21 Brands, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1094 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1094

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Federal Reserve Act to broaden the range of discount 
window loans which may be used as collateral for Federal reserve notes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1094

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Federal Reserve Act to broaden the range of discount 
window loans which may be used as collateral for Federal reserve notes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the third sentence 
of the second undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal 
Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 412) is amended by striking ``acceptances 
acquired under the provisions of section 13 of this Act'' and inserting 
``acceptances acquired under section 10A, 10B, 13, or 13A of this 
Act''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2021288EN.01000301.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 July 2021

(2021/C 288/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1802 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4381 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85298 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2428 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0853 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3878 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,538 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5867 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9285 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,0521 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5907 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4856 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1684 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6836 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5993 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 347,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9840 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6373 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4968 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 083,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9681 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,364 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,5186 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,669 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0146 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4589 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,0310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1802

JPY

Japanese yen

130,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4381

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85298

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2428

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0853

ISK

Iceland króna

145,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3878

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,538

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5867

RON

Romanian leu

4,9285

TRY

Turkish lira

10,0521

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5907

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4856

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1684

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6836

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5993

KRW

South Korean won

1 347,94

ZAR

South African rand

16,9840

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6373

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4968

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 083,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9681

PHP

Philippine peso

59,364

RUB

Russian rouble

87,5186

THB

Thai baht

38,669

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0146

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4589

INR

Indian rupee

88,0310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---