alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to the legal effect of certain treaties and other international agreements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 22, 1999

Mr. CHENOWETH introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to the legal effect of certain treaties and

other international agreements.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 63 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. A provision of a treaty which denies or

3 abridges any right enumerated in this Constitution shall

4 not be of any force or effect.

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. A provision of a treaty which denies or

6 abridges legislative authority of the several States shall

7 not be of any force or effect unless ratified by three8 fourths of the State legislatures within five years of the

9 date of the ratification of the treaty by the Senate.

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. No treaty shall authorize or permit any

11 foreign power or any international organization to super12 vise, control, or adjudicate rights of citizens of the United

13 States enumerated in this Constitution or any other mat14 ter essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of the

15 United States or the several States. No decision of any

16 international body purporting to interpret treaties to

17 which the United States is a party shall be given any prec18 edential effect by the courts of the United States or the

19 several States in any proceeding concerning any matter

20 essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of the United

21 States or the several States.

22 ‘‘SECTION 4. A treaty shall become effective as inter23 nal law in the United States only through the enactment

24 of appropriate legislation by the Congress. This section

25 shall not be construed to grant Congress any authority
3

•HJ 63 IH

1 to enact legislation that is not otherwise authorized by a

2 specific grant of legislative authority in this Constitution.

3 ‘‘SECTION 5. All agreements between the United

4 States and other nations which have any binding effect

5 of law upon this Nation or its citizens are treaties and

6 shall be subject to the procedures and limitations for trea7 ties set forth in this article and other provisions of this

8 Constitution.

9 ‘‘SECTION 6. Not later than 21 days after a treaty

10 is signed on behalf of the United States, the President

11 shall transmit the text of that treaty to the Senate for

12 ratification.’’.

Æ
No. 50284.

#### Protests 61151-K, etc., of M. Abouhamad et al. (New York).

*212Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were^uch as to bring the case within the-holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the-invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3





                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         AGREEMENT made and entered into this 1st day of February, 1998, but as
of the Effective Date hereinafter defined, by and between the proposed CAMELBACK
COMMUNITY BANK ("CCB") and JOSEPH D. REID ("Employee");


         WHEREAS, CCB has retained the services of the Employee as chairman of
the board and chief executive officer, and the Employee has accepted such
employment; and

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Agreement, which is
intended to set forth in its entirety the terms and conditions of the employment
relationship between CCB and the Employee;

         WHEREAS, the board of directors of CCB has approved this Agreement as
evidenced by the signature of the chairman of the board, who is authorized to
enter into this Agreement with the Employee;

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED as follows:

         1. Employment. The Employee is employed to render services to CCB as
are customarily performed by the chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer. It is recognized that this position is part-time.

         2. Compensation. There shall be no cash compensation.

         3. Term. The initial term of employment under this Agreement shall be
for a period of three (3) years, commencing on the Effective Date hereof.
Beginning on the anniversary date of the commencement of the second year of this
Agreement, its term shall be extended automatically for a period of one (1) year
in addition to the then remaining years of this Agreement unless either CCB or
the Employee gives contrary written notice to the other not less than 45 days in
advance of the anniversary date of the Agreement. Each year thereafter this
Agreement shall be extended automatically for a period of one (1) year.
Reference in this Agreement or in any notice given hereunder to the term of this
Agreement shall refer both to such initial term and to such extended terms.

         4. Effective Date. For the purpose of this Agreement, the "Effective
Date" is the date upon which the Employee shall enter upon the performance of
his duties, which is agreed to be no sooner than commencement of business by
CCB.
Exhibit 10.6

                              Jorge Alberto Almarez
                             157 Calle Federico #157
                                   B.C. Mexico

September 30th, 2012

Humberto Bravo
Placer Del Mar, Ltd.
302 Washington Street #351
San Diego, CA  92103

Dear Humberto:

Per our conversation please accept this letter to formalize our agreement. As
per section 4.1 of the Mineral Rights Revenue Sharing Agreement between me and
Placer Del Mar, Placer Del Mar was to begin making payments of $6,666 per month
on April 1, 2012.

As we discussed I understand your situation with collecting outstanding
receivables and agree to extend the payment due date from April 1, 2012 to
December 31, 2012. The monthly amount of $6,666 will continue to accrue as of
April 1, 2012 and if you are able to make payments before December 31, 2012 the
amount due on that date will be $133,320.00.

Respectfully yours,


/s/ Jorge Alberto Almarez
-------------------------------------
Jorge Alberto Almarez
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 71

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 18, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 106–62 is amended by

4 striking ‘‘October 21, 1999’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

5 ‘‘October 29, 1999’’. Notwithstanding section 106 of Pub6 lic Law 106–62, funds shall be available and obligations

7 for mandatory payments due on or about November 1,

8 1999, may continue to be made.

Æ
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-105255 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account One on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of
our report dated February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account One relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
No. 59406.

protests 218433-K (A), etc. (New York).

#### Novelty Veiling Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*290Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### [Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company Letterhead]

## Exhibit 99(c)

#### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen W.
Ritchie, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/Allen W. Ritchie
Allen W. Ritchie
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  the Report  pursuant to §906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent
required by the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the Company for  purposes of §18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

p0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

147014

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147014

COA: 312150

Kalamazoo CC: 1991

- 001491

- FC

JOSE ALEJANDRO VELASQUEZ

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
{"agency":"FERC","generated":"2019-04-09 12:42:57","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2019"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FERC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["20"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["33"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["2"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2019","quarter":"Q1"}
Before the Third Division,

July 12, 1948

No. 52456.

protests 803483-G, etc. (New York).

#### S. A. Haram et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 131

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

a new procedure for appointment of Electors for the election of the

President and Vice President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. ENGEL introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide a new procedure for appointment of

Electors for the election of the President and Vice President.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 131 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of final passage

2 of this joint resolution:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. In an election for President or Vice

5 President, each State shall appoint a number of Electors

6 to vote for each candidate for President or Vice President

7 that bears the same ratio to the total number of Electors

8 of that State as the number of votes received by that can9 didate bears to the total number of votes cast in that

10 State. Each State shall make computations for purposes

11 of carrying out this section in accordance with such laws

12 as it may adopt, including laws providing for the allocation

13 of Electors among more than two candidates receiving 5

14 percent or more of the total number of votes cast in the

15 State under such criteria as the State may by law estab16 lish, except that fractional numbers less than one one17 thousandth shall be disregarded. The person having the

18 greatest number of Electors appointed after Electors are

19 appointed from all States shall be the President.

20 ‘‘SECTION 2. For purposes of this article, the District

21 constituting the seat of Government of the United States

22 shall be treated as if it were a State, except that the Dis23 trict may not appoint a number of Electors greater than

24 the number of Electors appointed by the least populous

25 State.
3

•HJ 131 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress shall have the power to

2 enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

3 ‘‘SECTION 4. This article shall apply with regard to

4 any election for President or Vice President that is held

5 more than one year after the date of the ratification of

6 this article.’’.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 02, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 02, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0177. TYRESE GIBSON v. SAMANTHA GIBSON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2020CV340644
**Exhibit 10.1**

**VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION**

**Equity Award Acceleration Policy for Non-Employee Directors**

Effective July 30, 2010 (the “***Effective Date***”), if a non-employee member of the Board of Directors (the“***Board***”) of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (“***Volterra***”) is required to resign his or her position as a non-employee director of Volterra as a condition of a “***Change inControl***” and he or she will not otherwise serve as a member of the board of directors of the acquiring or surviving corporation immediately following the closing of the Change in Control such that there is no break in his or hercontinuous service to Volterra and/or a related service recipient company, then, contingent upon the effectiveness of the Change in Control, such individual’s then-outstanding compensatory equity awards that were granted in consideration forsuch individual’s service as a non-employee director, including but not limited to any stock options and restricted stock units (any such award, an “***Award***”) will become fully vested (and, as applicable, exercisable)immediately prior to the effectiveness of the earlier of such resignation and the Change in Control. 

For purposes of this Policy, a“***Change in Control***” will have the same meaning as such term (or comparable term) has under the applicable compensatory stock plan under which the Award was granted. 

For the avoidance of doubt, this Policy is intended to be consistent with the terms of Section 11(d) of Volterra’s 2004 Non-EmployeeDirectors’ Stock Option Plan, and will be construed in respect of Awards granted thereunder as so consistent. This Policy will apply to Awards that have been granted prior to the Effective Date as well as to any Awards granted after theEffective Date.
# L_2022285EN.01000301.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/2126

of 31 October 2022

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Castagna di Roccamonfina’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Castagna di Roccamonfina’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Castagna di Roccamonfina’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Castagna di Roccamonfina’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Castagna di Roccamonfina’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Castagna di Roccamonfina’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 October 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 252, 1.7.2022, p. 26.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Before the Third Division,

September 11, 1952

No. 56856.

#### Hahn *&*Wessel et al. *v.*United States,

protests 258372-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grenadine the same in all material respects as that the subject of *La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 44, C. A. D. 461), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 42

Regarding the use of United States Armed Forces as part of a NATO

peacekeeping operation implementing a Kosovo peace agreement.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 1999

Mr. GILMAN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding the use of United States Armed Forces as part

of a NATO peacekeeping operation implementing a

Kosovo peace agreement.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Peacekeeping

5 Operations in Kosovo Resolution’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress makes the following findings:

8 (1) The conflict in Kosovo has caused great

9 human suffering and, if permitted to continue, could

10 threaten the peace of Europe.
2

•HCON 42 IH

1 (2) The Government of Serbia and representa2 tives of the people of Kosovo may agree in Ram3 bouillet, France, to end the conflict in Kosovo.

4 (3) President Clinton has promised to deploy

5 approximately 4,000 United States Armed Forces

6 personnel to Kosovo as part of a North Atlantic

7 Treaty Organization (NATO) peacekeeping oper8 ation implementing a Kosovo peace agreement.

9 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR DEPLOYMENT OF UNITED

10 STATES ARMED FORCES TO KOSOVO.

11 The President is authorized to deploy United States

12 Armed Forces personnel to Kosovo as part of a NATO

13 peacekeeping operation implementing a Kosovo peace

14 agreement.

Æ