alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 96

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

the right of citizens of the United States to health care of equal high

quality.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 10, 2000

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding the right of citizens of the United

States to health care of equal high quality.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States:
2

•HJ 96 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. All citizens of the United States shall

3 enjoy the right to health care of equal high quality.

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to imple5 ment this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
No. 63492.

protest 59/535 (New York).

#### Colonia, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance witb rule 5(b) of tbe rules of tbis court, as amended, tbe protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### GENERAL COMPONENTS, INC., dba Hy-Tech Fitting & Components, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. H.T. COMPONENTS U.S.A., INC., Defendant—Appellee.

No. 03-17070.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 13, 2005.

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Mia S. Bladder, Esq., Buchalter Nemer Fields *&*Younger, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Scott Zarin, Esq., San Francisco, CA, Michael Zupan, Esq., Alexander Y. Thomas, Esq., Reed Smith, LLP, Falls Church, VA, David A. Temeles, Jr., Temeles & *617Temeles, PC, McLean, VA, H. Sinclair Kerr, Jr., Esq., Ivo Labar, Kerr & Wagstaffe, San Francisco, CA, for DefendantAppellee.

Before: GOODWIN, REAVLEY,* and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff General Components, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) here appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of H.T. Components, U.S.A., Inc. (“Defendant”) on its breach of contract claim. We review summary judgment de novo, see *Buono v. Norton,*371 F.3d 543, 545 (9th Cir.2004), and affirm.

Because the facts are well known to the parties, it is unnecessary to recite them in detail here. In sum, Plaintiff contends that Defendant breached the parties’ proprietary products agreement by producing and selling a shipping cap and plug virtually identical to a product designed by Plaintiff and disclosed to Defendant pursuant to the proprietary products agreement.

Under California law, “[n]o damages can be recovered for a breach of contract which are not clearly ascertainable in both their nature and origin.” Cal. Civ.Code § 3301; *see generally Grupe v. Glick,*26 Cal.2d 680, 160 P.2d 832, 840 (1945) (discussing recoverability of lost profits as damages for breach of contract). In addition, to be recoverable, damages must be the direct result of the defendant’s breach of contract. *See Automatic Poultry Feeder Co. v. Wedel,*213 Cal.App.2d 509, 28 Cal.Rptr. 795, 799 (1963).

As to its damages, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant stole away sales it would have made but for the Defendant’s entry into the specific shipping cap and plug market. However, on its motion for summary judgment, Defendant produced admissible evidence tending to show that Plaintiff would not have made the disputed sales. Plaintiff offered no evidence sufficient to create a material issue of fact concerning lost sales or any other recoverable damages. Accordingly, the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Defendant was proper.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *618courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT JERRY L. GENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 99-1431 RADFORD UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (MISC-99-1) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 16, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Jerry L. Gent appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and noting that the case would be dismissed with no further action of the court if Gent failed to pay the filing fee within fourteen days. The magistrate judge may only enter dispositive orders if the parties consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 1999). B ecause the parties did not consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction, proper review of the magistrate judge's order is in the district court. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b). This court has no jurisdiction over the appeal. See Tripati v. Rison , 847 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. 1988); see also Mendes Junior Int'l Co. v. M/V Sokai Maru , 978 F.2d 920, 924 (5th Cir. 1992); Silberstein v. Silberstein , 859 F.2d 40, 41-42 (7th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We grant Gent's motion to pro ceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. REMANDED 2
July 24, 1946

No. 51255.

Suit 4536.

#### *Sandeman & Sons*v. *United States.*

C. D. 957. Appeal dismissed by stipulation on May 29, 1946.
Case No. 14,935a.

#### UNITED STATES v. DE GRIEFF.

[10 Reporter, 258.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

July 29, 1880.

Criminad Procedure—Recognizance—Reciting Offence.

Where defendants are arrested and held to bail before a commissioner to appear in a federal court, it is not necessary that the recognizance shall show upon its face that the offence is one embraced within a statute of the United States.

Defendants [Anthony De Grieff and others] were indicted for unlawfully conspiring together to commit an offence against the United States, which is specified in section 5443 of the Revised Statutes. [A motion made to quash the indictment was denied. Case No. 14,936.] They did not appear, and their bail was forfeited.

C. P. L. Butler, Jr., Asst. U. S. Dist. Atty.

Robert S. Green and Benjamin B. Foster, for defendants.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

SHIPMAN, District Judge.

This is an action at law upon a recognizance. The defendants having been arrested, the recognizance was taken before a United States commissioner for their appearance in court. The defendants insist that the recognizance is invalid; their position is that the commissioner has no power to commit or hold to bail except for offences against the United States; that the recognizance must show upon its face that the. officer had jurisdiction; that the act *799which is stated in the recognizance is not an offence by any act of congress, and therefore the recognizance is void. The defendants contend that the recognizance must necessarily describe the particular offence which is charged in the indictment. I do not decide this part of the proposition, but I do not by any means concede its truth. U. S. v. George, [Case No. 15,199]; People v. Kane, 4 Denio, 530. The proposition also asserts that the particular offence must be so described that it shall appear upon the face of the recognizance to be an offence which is embraced within a statute of the United States, and that a partial or imperfect description cannot be supplemented by reference in the recognizance to the indictment where the offence is correctly described. In this part of the proposition I do not concur. The general principle in respect to the manner in which offences should be described in recognizances is laid down by Chief Justice Nelson, in People v. Blankman, 17 Wend. 252, as follows: “It is not necessary to set forth the offence in the warrant, mittimus, or recognizance with all the particularity'or detail required in an indictment.” 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 33. The decision in U. S. v. Hand [Case No. 15,296], which is relied upon by the defendants, is not in point. Judgment for the plaintiff.
No. 67272.

protests 324298-K, 58/6938, and 58/10871 (New York).

#### F. W. Woolworth Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures in chief value of lead similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61156, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Stephanie Dobitsch

**Resilience**
Assistant Administrator for National Preparedness

Stephanie Dobitsch serves as FEMA’s Assistant Administrator for the National Preparedness Directorate. In this capacity, she leads FEMA’s effort to provide doctrine, training, education, exercise, and community preparedness support to enhance the capabilities of our partners and communities across the United States and internationally.

Prior to her appointment, Ms. Dobitsch served as the Deputy Under Secretary for the Office of Intelligence and Analysis in the Department of Homeland Security, overseeing the development and delivery of high-quality intelligence tailored to meet the needs of homeland security stakeholders. She has decades of experience working national security issues, serving in a variety of intelligence roles in support of multiple departments and agencies. 

Ms. Dobitsch received her Bachelor of Science in International Studies from the University of Scranton. She currently attends Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business as part of the Executive Master of Business Administration program. 

Last updated November 22, 2023

Return to top
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

GEORGE ANTHONY TOLIVER, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 84176 

FEE: 4 202; 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL fri:P 

This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se notice of 

appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Christy L. Craig, 

Judge. 

On January 27, 2022, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal 

in district court case number C-21-353123-1. The notice of appeal fails to 

cite any identifiable order in the notice of appeal. See NRAP 3(c)(1)(B) 

(requiring a notice of appeal to "designate the judgment, order or part 

thereof being appealed"). Accordingly, this court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

J. 

Silver 

J. PìeÅ4up , 

Cadish Pickering 

IA postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus was orally 

denied on November 30, 2021, in related district court case number A-21-

841549-W. However, that order was not designated in this appeal. 

Appellant may file an appeal from that order when the district court enters 

a written order. 

22-0607,C 
cc: Hon. Christy L. Craig, District Judge 

George Anthony Toliver 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

1,17A -.ink:, 

2
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      annual report of Affinity Media International Corp. fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Affinity Media International
      Corp.




Date:
                April 12, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Howard
              CohlHoward
                Cohl
              President






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Media International Corp. and
      will
      be retained by Affinity Media International Corp. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 243

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the importance of mental health

awareness, mental disorders, and early detection of mental illnesses to

facilitate entry into treatment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Mrs. JONES of Ohio (for herself, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr. OWENS,

and Mr. MEEKS of New York) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the importance

of mental health awareness, mental disorders, and early

detection of mental illnesses to facilitate entry into treatment.

Whereas an estimated 28 percent of the population of the

United States has a diagnosable mental or substance

abuse condition;

Whereas only 8 percent of adults with a diagnosable mental

disorder use mental health services;

Whereas a remaining 20 percent of those adults with a

diagnosable mental disorder never receive timely treatment;
2

•HCON 243 IH

Whereas nearly 11 percent of children and adolescents receive

mental health services from school systems;

Whereas the Surgeon General’s Report, ‘‘Mental Health: A

Report of the Surgeon General’’, emphasizes the fact that

mental health is fundamental to overall health, that

Americans need to better understand the importance of

mental health, and that Americans should know mental

health services are available and should seek mental

health services when necessary;

Whereas the Surgeon General reported that mental disorders

and illnesses are critical health concerns facing all segments of society;

Whereas education and information about mental health and

mental health services are important to detection and

treatment; and

Whereas Congress as an institution and Members of Congress individually are in unique positions to help raise

public awareness about mental health: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) all Americans should find out more about

4 mental health services in their communities and seek

5 mental health treatment when necessary;

6 (2) the Secretary of Education should encour7 age, establish, and promote a mental health cam8 paign in elementary and secondary schools across

9 the Nation; and
3

•HCON 243 IH

1 (3) the Federal Government has a responsibility

2 to—

3 (A) endeavor to raise awareness about

4 mental health; and

5 (B) continue to consider ways to improve

6 access to, and the quality of, mental health

7 services.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated February 14, 2000, which appears in
Vertica Software, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10 SB12G/A for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


                                              /s/ Randolph Scott & Company
                                              Certified Public Accountants, Inc.


San Anselmo, California
February 21, 2001
No. 52840.

#### York Street Flax Spinning Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6649-R (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When the case was called for hearing there was no appearance on the part of petitioner. An examination of the record disclosing nothing that would warrant the court in granting the petition, the petition was denied.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09446

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 09446\09446_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09446\09446_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09446\09446_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09446\09446_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09446\09446_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09446\09446_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09446\09446_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09446\09446_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09446\Certification Statement Plant ID 09446.pdf Plant certification statement

09446\Supplemental Documents\09446_New Ulm Public Utilities, Plant ID 9446, Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09446\Supplemental Documents\09446_New Ulm Public Utilities, Plant ID 9446, Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09446\Supplemental Documents\09446_New Ulm Public Utilities, Plant ID 9446, Map 3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip M. Pead, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: (i) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                           By: /s/ PHILIP M. PEAD
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Philip M. Pead Chairman,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 6, 2005
October 24, 1956

No. 60308.

Suit 4892.

#### United States *v.*M. Pressner & Co.

C. D. 1784. (Appeal dismissed September 28, 1956.)
##### 

\

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Steven
S. Myers, as Chief Executive Officer of SM&A (the Company) hereby certify
that, based on my knowledge:

1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                        |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated:
October 30, 2003 |  | /s/ STEVEN S. MYERS                 
|                        |  |                                     
|                        |  | Steven S. Myers                     
|                        |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Steven
S. Myers, as Chief Executive Officer of SM&A (the Company) hereby certify
that, based on my knowledge:

1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated:
October 30, 2003 |  | /s/ CATHY L. WOOD                    
|                        |  |                                      
|                        |  | Cathy L. Wood                        
|                        |  | Executive Vice President,            
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary