alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               271,003
<PP&E>                                          92,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 810,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          241,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           724
<OTHER-SE>                                     393,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   810,673
<SALES>                                        147,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,546
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               145,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,225)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,839)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
The Dial Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated January 29, 1999,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Dial Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 1998, and to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
December 17, 1999
No. 50824.

#### Protests 70025-K, etc., of Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 59900.

#### Ch. Chraime *v.*United States,

protest 276703-K (New York).

Opinion by

Foed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32% percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.
EXHIBIT 4.2

                   Amendment No. 1 to W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd.
                       2001 Employee Equity Incentive Plan

      WHEREAS, on July 24, 2001, the Board of Directors of W.P. Stewart & Co.,
Ltd., a Bermuda company (the "Company") adopted the Company's 2001 Employee
Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan");

      WHEREAS, all Company shares heretofore made available for awards under the
Plan are currently subject to outstanding awards and the Company considers it
desirable and in its best interests to make additional shares available for
awards under the Plan;

      WHEREAS, the Company considers it desirable and in its best interests that
the Plan be amended to make non-employee directors eligible to receive awards
under the Plan;

      WHEREAS, the Company considers it desirable to provide for more
flexibility in the determination of the payment terms of promissory notes that
may be executed by participants under the Plan; and

      WHEREAS, the Company considers it desirable to eliminate the requirement
that awards under the Plan contain options and restricted shares in certain
proportions and to make certain technical corrections to the text of the Plan;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

      1. Section 1 is amended by adding "and non-employee directors" after
"employees".

      2. Section 2(i) is amended by adding "and any Director, in each case"
after "Affiliates".

      3. Section 4(a) is amended by substituting "2,500,000" for "1,500,000" in
the first sentence thereof and in the fifth sentence thereof, by substituting
"calendar year 2001" for "each respective calendar year" in clause (i) of the
first sentence thereof, and by adding "except in the event of a change of
control (as defined in any option agreement or purchase agreement executed
pursuant to an Award)," at the beginning of clause (ii) of the first sentence
thereof.

      4. Section 6(a)(iv) is amended by deleting ", which promissory note shall
provide for interest on the unpaid balance thereof equal to the greatest of (A)
10%, (B) the applicable U.S. federal short-term rate under Section 1274(d) of
the Code or any counterpart to such rate as may be prescribed under the tax laws
of the Participant's country of residence or employment, as appropriate, as of
the date of exercise, or (C) a market rate, as determined by the Company as of
the date of exercise" and by adding "or service as a Director" after
"employment" in the last sentence thereof.

      5. Section 6(b) is amended by adding "or service as a Director" after
"employment" in clauses (ii) and (vi) thereof.

      6. Exhibit A is amended by deleting the lines for the years 2002 and 2003.

<PAGE>

      7. Section 4(b) of Exhibit B is amended by substituting "__%" for "10%" in
clause (A) thereof.

      8. The first paragraph of Exhibit C is amended by substituting "___
percent (__%)" for "[ten percent (10%]".

      9. Section 7 of Exhibit D is amended by substituting "Change of Control"
for "Change in Control."

      The date of this Amendment is January 25, 2002.
No. 65362.

#### Atkins, Kroll & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 274765-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the . merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62925.

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 234122-K (Detroit).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
## S I0-100304-05 1

/ 

## OF";~''iS"OR D COMTROLNO . 

## ITHAC A TOMPKIN S REGIONA L 

## AIRPOR T Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretary Unite d State s Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 2 5 February201 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : I suppor tth e Continenta l Airline s applicatio n t o provid e dail ynonsto p servic e betwee n Ne w York/Newar k

an d Toky o Haned a airpor tan d connectin g servic e betwee n Ithaca , Ne wYor k an d Toky o Haned a vi a a n easyconnectio n throug h Continental' s Newar k Libert yhub . Ne wai rservic e t o Haneda , whic h i s schedule d t o begi n late rthi s year , i s mad e possibl e byth e wid e rangin g ope n skie s agreemen t wit h Japa n achieve d byyou rDepartment , i applau d you reffort s o n th e histori cope n skie s agreemen t an d no wurg e yo u t o selec tContinenta l t o provid e thi s nonsto p dail yservic e linkin g th e U.S.' s financia l an d commercia l cente ra tNe wYork/Newar k wit h Tokyo' s central/downtow n airport . Continental' s Liberty - Haned a servic e woul d provid e a critica l lin k betwee n tw o o fth e world' s larges t economies , an d hel p boos ttrad e an d commerc e betwee n Toky o an d point s al l alon g th e eas tcoas to f th e U.S . Additionally , Continental' s servic e a tLibert yi s th e closest , mos tconvenien tairpor tt o downtow n Ne wYor k

City , an d a

s th e onl ytru e hu b i n th e NY C metropolita n area , i s th e onl ygatewa y acces s fro m thi s regio n tha tals o provide s Ithac a wit h a n easy , same-airlin e connectio n t o Haneda , benefitin g ou rloca l econom ya s regiona l income s ar e enhance d an d trad e expands . Continenta l Airline s i s committe d t o th e Asia n regio n an d t o nonsto p Toky o Haned a service . Th e Ne w York/Newar k

economy , th e U.S . consumer s i n upstat e Ne wYor k an d alon g th e U.S . eas tcoast , an d th e airline' s thousand s o femployee s wil l benefi tfro m Continental' s propose d servic e an d wil l wor k togethe r t o mak e Libert yInternationa l Airport - Haned a servic e a rea l success . Fo rth e benefit s above , includin g thos e her e i n Ithaca , Ne wYork , I urg e yo u t o awar d Toky o Haned a riaht s t o Continenta l Airline s an d m yregio n o fth e U.S . Sitiqerely , Robfer tA . Nic h r , Ithac a Tompkin s Regiona l Airpor t
No. 55803.

protests 166540-K, etc. (New York).

#### Sidney Bertner Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Before the First Division,

March 18, 1958

No. 61688.

#### Max Eckardt & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 298681-K and 302426-K (New York).

*489Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are, in fact, crib or nativity sets, and “that the enumerated articles chargeable with duty which they most resemble are crib sets made of papier máché,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51875.

#### Van Raalte Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 963406-G, etc. (New York).

*128Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.'
No. 51249.

#### Protests 89852-K, etc., of Raphael H. Elmaleh Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**          I, James L. Box, certify that:          1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of ebank Financial Services, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;          4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;          5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:May 31, 2006         By:  /s/ James L. Box    James L. Box, President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 67691.

#### The Beton Co. and Castelazo & Associates *v.*United States,

protest 300335-K(A) (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon yarn similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 64033, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
CHEMICAL STRUCTURE DIAGRAM

CPAR 70

CH3(CH2CHCl)8CH2CHClCH2CHClCH2CH3 (representative)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of INSCI Corp. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), Henry F.
Nelson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ HENRY F. NELSON
--------------------------------------------
Henry F. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer and President
December 3, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to INSCI Corp. and will be retained
by INSCI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request


<PAGE>
# L_2022328EN.01006401.xml

| 22.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/64

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/2525

of 21 December 2022

implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 of 18 January 2016 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya and repealing Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (1), and in particular Article 21(6) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

| (2) | Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-627/20 (2), the entry for one listed entity should be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-627/20 (2), the entry for one listed entity should be deleted.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2022.

For the Council

The President

M. BEK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

1

(2)  Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022, Libyan African Investment Company (Laico) v Council, T-627/20.

2

Libyan African Investment Company (Laico)

Council

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (List of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 6(2)), Part B (Entities), the following entry is deleted:

| ‘1. | Libyan Arab African Investment Company – LAAICO (a.k.a. LAICO)’. |
| --- | --- |

‘1.

Libyan Arab African Investment Company – LAAICO (a.k.a. LAICO)’.

---
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 82

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 17, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting in

5 lieu thereof ‘‘November 23, 1999’’. Public Law 106–46

6 is amended by striking ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ and insert7 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘November 23, 1999’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 15**

May 12, 2008 

PC Connection, Inc. 

730 MilfordRoad 

Merrimack, NH 

We have reviewed, in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of PC Connection, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, as indicated in our report datedMay 12, 2008; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, whichis included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-40172, 333-50845, 333-50847, 333-66450, 333-69981, 333-83943, 333-91584, 333-106652,333-130389, and 333-144065 on Form S-8. 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is notconsidered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

Deloitte & Touché LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts
No. 55796.

protest 160023-K (New York).

#### C. H. Crowley *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 10.11
 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 
 RECITALS
 
  AGREEMENT
  Grant of Option    [is][is not]
 Option Term [five][ten]
 Vesting [Choose one of the following provisions.]
 [Option 1]
  Vesting Event 1 [Determined by Committee  these can be performance criteria or a
combination of time-based restrictions and performance criteria.]
 [Option 2]




---



##### 



Percentage of Original
    
    
    
    CumulativeGrant Vesting on
    
    Number of Shares
    
    Percentage of OriginalVesting Date
    
    Vesting Date
    
    Vesting
    
    Grant Vested25%
    
    
    
    25%25%
    
    
    
    50%25%
    
    
    
    75%25%
    
    
    
    100%
 
 Method of Exercise
 Effect of Termination of Employment or Other Service
 Restrictions on Transfer of Option
 Rights as a Stockholder
 No Right to Employment
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Binding Effect, Successors
 Further Acts
 Amendment
 Choice of Law and Severability
 Notices
 If to Optionee:Fax:Electronic Mail:If to Company:
    
    Magnum Hunter Resources CorporationAttention: Paul Johnston777 Post Oak Blvd.Suite 650Houston, Texas 77056Fax: 832-369-6992Electronic Mail:pjohnston@magnumhunterresources.com
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Entire Agreement
 Grant Subject to Terms of Plan and this Agreement.
  - 4 -




---



##### 



COMPANYMAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporationBy:Gary C. Evans, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOPTIONEE
 
 - 5 -
No. 57576.

#### Davies Turner & Co. and Niro Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 183786-K (New York).

*276Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of a Niro spray drying unit the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*and *Niro Corp.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 248, C. D. 1477), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-47355 on Form S-3 and Registration Nos. 333-10149, 333-10153, 333-10157,
333-11037, 333-11037, 333-13187, 333-56607, 333-67619, and 333-71113 on Form S-8
of the Dial Corporation of our report dated January 29, 1999, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Dial Corporation for the year ended December
31, 1998.
 
                                          DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
March 25, 1999