alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7543
MICHAEL G. KESELICA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.
No. 04-6005
MICHAEL G. KESELICA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.
No. 04-6215
MICHAEL G. KESELICA, Petitioner - Appellant,- 2 - versus J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-575) Submitted: April 14, 2004 Decided: June 3, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Nos. 03-7543, 04-6005, dismissed; No. 04-6215, affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael G. Keselica, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Michael G. Keselica seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s orders denying relief on his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and denying his motions for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(a). * An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). In No. 03-7543 and No. 04-6005, we have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Keselica has not satisfied either- 4 - standard. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Keselica’s motions to supplement the record and for a certificate of appealability and dismiss Keselica’s appeals. In No. 04-6215, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Keselica v. Stouffer , No. CA-02-575 (E.D. Va. Dec. 4, 2003). We deny as moot Keselica’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 03-7543 & No. 04-6005 - DISMISSED No. 04-6215 - AFFIRMED
- Home
- Who We Are    - Organization
  - History
  - Policies & Planning
  - FGDC Secretariat
- What We Do  - ADVANCEMENT OF THE NSDI
- Geospatial Data Act
- Collaboration & Partnerships
- Develop Geospatial Shared Services    - Geospatial Platform
  - Cloud Computing
  - Geospatial Interoperability
- Manage Federal Geospatial Resources    - A-16 NGDA Portfolio Management
  - Geospatial Platform Marketplace
- Standards Development
- Geospatial Metadata
 
- Initiatives  - Current    - NSDI Strategic Plan 2021-2024
  - Geospatial Platform Shared Services
  - NGDA Management Plan
  - Open Water Data Initiative
  - National Address Database
  - GeoPathways
  - Disaster Risk Resilience
- Emerging Topics    - Geolocation Privacy
  - Crowdsourcing
  - Education & Workforce Development
  - New Geodetic Datums
- Past Activities    - Cooperative Agreements Program
  - Fifty States Initiative
  - Geospatial Line of Business
  - SmartBUY
 
- Organization    - Overview
  - Steering Committee
  - Executive Committee
  - National Geospatial Advisory Committee
  - Coordination Group
  - Working Groups
  - Subcommittees
  - FGDC Secretariat
  - Collaborating Partners
  - Membership Directory
- Resources    - Key Publications
  - Download Geospatial Standards
  - Policies & Planning
  - Lexicon of Geospatial Terminology
  - FGDC Geospatial Services Status Checker
  - News
  - Calendar
  - Media Resources

****

#                     FGDC Announces Establishment of New Address Theme                

        -  Home 
        -  News 
        -  FGDC Announces Establishment of New Address Theme 

The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) has announced the establishment of New National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) Address Theme. The FGDC Steering Committee, in concurrence with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approved the creation of a NGDA Address Theme on August 8, 2016.  The addition of the new theme represents an official change to the list of NGDA Data Themes established as part of previous updates to OMB Circular A-16, Appendix E.

The Lead Agencies of the newly created Address Theme are the Department of Transportation and the Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau.  The new Address Theme will be supported by a subcommittee and will support the ongoing work to develop a National Address Database.

The NGDA Theme list and associated documents and web pages are being updated to reflect this change. The current list of NGDA Themes is available from the FGDC website at: http://www.fgdc.gov/policyandplanning/a-16/index_html

#### Contact Us

**Office:**
**Fax:**
**Email:**

##### **Subscribe** to Our Mailing List                            for Important News & Updates

**Subscribe

******Like                                    us**

******Follow                                    us**

******RSS**

Policies & NoticesUSA.gov Download Adobe Reader  Download Office Viewers
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Nutraceutical International Corporation (the “Company”) for the period endedJune 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank W. Gay II, Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Frank  W. Gay II                                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Frank W. Gay II                                      |
| *Chairman of the Board  and Chief Executive Officer* |
| Date: July 29, 2004                             |

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Nutraceutical International Corporation (the “Company”) for the period endedJune 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Leslie M. Brown, Jr., Senior VicePresident, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Leslie  M. Brown, Jr.                                                     |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Leslie M. Brown, Jr.                                                          |
| *Senior Vice President, Finance,  Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary* |
| Date: July 29, 2004                                                           |

 

Signed originals of these written statements requiredby Section 906 have been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
#### Boyer *et al. vs.*Floury.

Where the land had formerly been owned by one Bruce, who made a deed to one Bonner to secure an indebtedness; and the ancestor of the plaintiffs negotiated with Bonner for the purchase of the *313land, paid an amount of money agreed on, and directed the deed to be made to the defendant, which was done, and the fee simple title was conveyed to her for her own proper use, benefit and be-hoof; and Bruce, the owner of the equity'of redemption, also made a deed to the defendant, and it does not appear who paid him therefor, no resulting trust arose in favor of the plaintiffs’ ancestor or in their favor against the defendant.

January 30, 1888.

Title. Trusts. Before Judge Jenkins. Baldwin superior court. July term, 1887.

Reported in the decision.

C. P. Crawford, for plaintiffs.

Whitfield & Allen, by J. H. Lumpkin, for defendant.

Blandford, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error, as heirs at law of one Boyer, brought an action of ejectment against Milly A. Floury to recover a certain tract of land in the county of Baldwin. On the trial of the case, they showed that they were the heirs at law of Boyer, who had bought the land in question from Bonner and had paid Bonner certain money and directed Bonner to make a deed to Milly A. Floury for the land; in which deed he conveyed the fee simple title to her, to her own proper use, benefit and behoof. Bonner did not own the title to the land, but held what is called an equitable mortgage, — a deed with bond for title back, certain money having been paid thereon. The title, it ap - pears, was in one Bruce; and there was also a deed from Bruce to Milly A. Floury. Who paid Bruce any money, the record does not disclose. The court below was asked to instruct the j ury that the payment of the money by Boyer, and the making of the deed by Bonner to Millv A Floury at his instance, raised a trust in Boyer by implication, which trust resulted to Boyer and his heirs at law. The court refused to charge as requested, but instructed *314the jury that if Boyer procured the deed made to Milly A. Floury, intending thereby to make a gift of the land to her, the plaintiffs could not recover; and this is excepted to.

The doctrine of implied and resulting trusts is a very difficult one. Indeed it should be swept away by legislation, and should have no resting place in this State. It served its purpose long ago. Where a man makes a deed to another, no trust being reserved in the deed, but the whole title being conveyed with warranty, etc., no trust should result. But whatever the law is on that subject, this case is taken out of the doctrine of resulting trusts by the fact that Boyer did not pay the purchase money. The money he paid was to remove Bonner’s incumbrance on the land. We hold, therefore, that the court did right to instruct the jury that the heirs at law of Boyer could not recover; and the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 63852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22137]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Land Use Change From 
Aeronautical to Non-Aeronautical Use at Hanscom Field in Bedford, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(d), notice is 
being given that the FAA is considering a request from the 
Massachusetts Port Authority (MPA) in East Boston, MA, to waive the 
surplus property requirements for approximately 7.1 acres of airport 
property located at Hanscom Field in Bedford, MA.
    The subject parcel has been identified for commercial development 
and MPA will negotiate a long term lease to generate non-aviation 
revenue for the airport. As such, MPA is requesting a release to change 
the property from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use. It has been 
determined through study and master planning that the subject parcel 
will not be needed for future aeronautical purposes. Further, the 
parcel of land is separated by a road and not contiguous to the airport 
proper. Full and permanent relief of the surplus property requirements 
on this parcel will allow the airport to generate long term revenue 
through lease of the land. All lease revenue will continue to be 
subject to the FAAs revenue-use policy and dedicated to the maintenance 
and operation of Hanscom Field.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 17, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents 
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and 
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region 
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts, 
Telephone 781-238-7618.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 6, 2016.
Mary T. Walsh,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-22137 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
No. 66181.

#### Radio Wire Television, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/9839.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2279
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           76453
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 12275
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       8737
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           24294
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             23216
<LOANS>                                         196001
<ALLOWANCE>                                        750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  328319
<DEPOSITS>                                      294025
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3350
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       30944
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  328319
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   7810
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1496
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9306
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                6296
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6296
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3010
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (90)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1865
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1865
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.41
<LOANS-NON>                                        901
<LOANS-PAST>                                       402
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  1140
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    873
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     8
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                       750
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  750
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 28 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. of the 
District of Columbia on April 11, 1999, is filled by the reappointment 
of the incumbent for a term of six years, effective April 12, 1999.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 64734.

#### Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 300744-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C.D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of San Telmo Energy Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.







Dated:   October 29, 2003                                      Signed:  ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­/s/ Brian J. Bass



Name:  Brian J. Bass

Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 59937.

#### Packer Scott & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 835671-G and 796960-G (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
Before the First Division,

January 21, 1946

No. 50831.

#### Petitions 6490-R, etc., of F. W. Woolworth Co. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Petitioner’s witness testified that the shipments under consideration were the last, before the outbreak of the war, from the German manufacturers. The invoice prices used on entry had been in effect for 2 years, during which time they had been consistently used by petitioner in entering such and similar merchandise. After these entries were submitted to the customs authorities and before appraisement of the merchandise, petitioner conferred with the customs examiner who advised that special agents were conducting an investigation in Germany to determine market conditions and prices with respect to merchandise like that involved herein. Petitioner wrote to the foreign manufacturers urging that the information sought by customs authorities be furnished as soon as possible but because of the war, petitioner was never advised. Before the appraiser advanced the entered values, petitioner was offered the opportunity to amend these entries, but declined to do so, preferring to file appeals for reap-praisement. The reappraisement appeals were subsequently abandoned since it was impossible to secure the necessary evidence. From an examination of the record and a consideration of all the facts, the court was satisfied that there was no attempt to withhold any facts or to deceive the customs officials in making the entries in question. The petitions were therefore granted.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of CSK Auto Corporation of our reports dated
December 23, 1997 and April 10, 1998 relating to the financial statements of CSK
Auto Corporation, which appear in such Prospectus. We also consent to the use in
the Prospectus constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
CSK Auto Corporation of our reports dated December 23, 1997 and April 10, 1998
related to the financial statement schedule of CSK Auto Corporation, which
appear in such Prospectus. We also consent to the references to us under the
headings "Experts" and "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" in such
Prospectus. However, it should be noted that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has not
prepared or certified such "Selected Consolidated Financial Data."
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
November 12, 1998