alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 442 Agreed to House (ATH)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 442

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2000

  Mr. Armey submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Tuesday, 
November 14, 2000, or Wednesday, November 15, 2000, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, December 4, 2000, 
or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Tuesday, November 14, 2000, or Wednesday, 
November 15, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, December 5, 2000, or until such time 
on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; Opinion Filed September 18, 2012.

In The 

### i!ILnIrt 

## uf\pptaIs iftI! Jistrirt uf rxn tt 

### Jattwi No. 05-12-01221-CR
GERRY W. MOONEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F02-35420-MJ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers Opinion ByJustice Myers Gerry W. Mooney appeals the trial court’s orderdenying his “motion to unseal documents previously seaIed.t Appellate courts havejurisdiction over appeals by criminal defendants only after conviction or from certain statutorily designated appealable orders. See Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d588, 589—90(Tex. App.—Dallas 1998,110pet.). TheCourthasfoundno authorityproviding the rightto appeal an orderdenying a motion to unseal documents.

Appellant was convicted ofaggravated assault on a public seant with a deadlyweapon and sentenced to fonv-flve years’ imprisonment. His convicflon was affinned on direct appeal. i’. Stare, No. 05-05-01395-CR (Tex. App—Dallas Dec. 13, 2006. o refd).We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

LANA MYERS JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEx. R. App. P. 47 12122IF.U05

### nnrt nf Apirztti 

## iftI! litrirt uf (!Ixa 

## at Datku JUDGMENT GERRY W. MOONEY. Appellant Appeal from the Criminal [)istrict Court No. 3 

### of I)allas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F02- 

### No. 05-12-01221 -CR V. 35420-MJ). Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices THE STATE OF TEXAS. Appellee Moseley and Fillmore participating. Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, we DISMISS the appeal forwant ofjurisdiction. Judgment entered September 18, 2012.

LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 1037** 

BETTY JANE AYERS ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

SHEETZ, INC. ,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv
- 00434 )

Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges , HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Betty Jane Ayers , Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Todd Hughes , PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC , Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM :

Betty Jane Ayers appeals the district court ’ s order
entering judment in favor of the Defendant/Appellee in
accordance with the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed the
record, including the transcript of the trial and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Ayers’
motion to vacate judgment and grant the Appellee’s motion to

submit on briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument wou ld not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered November 24, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00831
- CV RENATA BLACK A/K/A RENATA MUTIS, Appellant
V. LAKELAND WEST CAPITAL XXIII, LLC, Appell ee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 15609

ORDER Before the Court are appellant’s motion for extension of time to file her opening brief and appellee’s response in opposition

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the opening brief received November 20, 2020 filed as of the date of this
order. Appellee’s responsive brief shall be filed no later than December 28, 2020.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
No. 59855.

#### Halper Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 215981-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C, C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ICx Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 31, 2009



By:

/s/    HANS C.
KOBLERHans C. Kobler Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/    DEBORAH D.
MOSIERDeborah D. Mosier Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to ICx Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by ICx Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Standard Pacific Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 7, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth L. Campbell              
|Kenneth L. Campbell                  
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                     
|/s/ John M. Stephens                 
|John M. Stephens                     
|Senior Vice President and            
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION





I, William P. Horgan, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Human Pheromone Sciences, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: August 9, 2006



/s/ William P. Horgan

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Before the Second Division,

January 31, 1947

No. 51544.

#### Protests 964697-G, etc., of Julius Kayser & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United. States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 34 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.34

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                            Joint Resolution

 
       Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Whereas the organization now known as the Veterans of Foreign Wars of 
  the United States was founded in Columbus, Ohio, on September 29, 
  1899;

Whereas the VFW represents approximately 2,000,000 veterans of the 
  Armed Forces who served overseas in World War I, World War II, Korea, 
  Vietnam, the Persian Gulf War, and Bosnia; and

Whereas the VFW has, for the past 100 years, provided voluntary and 
  unselfish service to the Armed Forces and to veterans, communities, 
  States, and the Nation and has worked toward the betterment of 
  veterans in general and society as a whole: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress--
        (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 100th 
    anniversary of the founding of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 
    United States (the VFW);
        (2) congratulates the VFW on achieving that milestone;
        (3) commends the approximately 2,000,000 veterans who belong to 
    the VFW and thanks them for their service to their fellow veterans 
    and the Nation; and
        (4) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation 
    recognizing the anniversary of the VFW and the contributions made 
    by the VFW to veterans and the Nation and calling upon the people 
    of the United States to observe such anniversary with appropriate 
    ceremonies and activities.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# L_2022316EN.01010001.xml

| 8.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/100

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2292 of 6 September 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to requirements for the entry into the Union of consignments of food-producing animals and certain goods intended for human consumption

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 304 of 24 November 2022
  )

On page 20, Article 21, point 1(c):

for:

| ‘(c) | sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts and referred to by the following HS subheadings: 0704 90, 0706 90, 0708 10, 0708 20, 0708 90, 0712 34, 0712 35, 0712 50, 0712 60, 0713 10, 0713 33, 0712 34, 0713 39, 0713 40, 0713 90, 0910 99, 1201 10, 1201 90, 1207 50, 1207 99, 1209 10, 1209 21, 1209 91 or 1214 90 of Part Two of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts and referred to by the following HS subheadings: 0704 90, 0706 90, 0708 10, 0708 20, 0708 90, 0712 34, 0712 35, 0712 50, 0712 60, 0713 10, 0713 33, 0712 34, 0713 39, 0713 40, 0713 90, 0910 99, 1201 10, 1201 90, 1207 50, 1207 99, 1209 10, 1209 21, 1209 91 or 1214 90 of Part Two of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87;’,

read:

| ‘(c) | sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts and referred to by the following HS subheadings: 0704 90, 0706 90, 0708 10, 0708 20, 0708 90, 0712 34, 0712 35, 0712 50, 0712 60, 0713 10, 0713 33, 0713 39, 0713 40, 0713 90, 0910 99, 1201 10, 1201 90, 1207 50, 1207 99, 1209 10, 1209 21, 1209 91 or 1214 90 of Part Two of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(c)

sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts and referred to by the following HS subheadings: 0704 90, 0706 90, 0708 10, 0708 20, 0708 90, 0712 34, 0712 35, 0712 50, 0712 60, 0713 10, 0713 33, 0713 39, 0713 40, 0713 90, 0910 99, 1201 10, 1201 90, 1207 50, 1207 99, 1209 10, 1209 21, 1209 91 or 1214 90 of Part Two of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87;’.

---
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 1795 Lower Tribunal No. 20CF 000491O S

_____________________________
J AMELL T YRONE C OLEMAN , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County

. Mikaela Nix

- Walker, Judge.

November 14, 2023

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

TRAVER
, C

. J. , and WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Brett S. Chase
, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam
, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Case No. 9,660.

#### The MISSISSIPPI.

District Court, S. D. Florida.

1871.

Salvage.

[Libel in rem by Grayham I. Lester and others against the cargo and materials of the American steamship Mississippi.]

L. W. Bethel, for libelants.

S. B. Mallory, for respondent.

McKINNEY, District Judge.

The allegation and proofs in this case having been fully heard and understood, and deliberation had, and the value of that portion of the cargo saved by the first .set of -salvors having been fixed at the sum of $175,000 by agreement of the parties, including the portion sold by the marshal for the sum of $27,662.28, for the purpose of determining the salvage thereon; and that a portion of said cargo saved by the second set of salvors has been sold by the marshal for the sum of $1,521.35, and the remainder thereof appraised under an order of court at the sum of $2.820.30, mailing in the aggregate the sum of $4,341.85,—

It is therefore ordered, ■ adjudged, and decreed, that the libelants have and recover in full compensation for their salvage services, rendered to the cargo of the steamship Mississippi twenty per cent, of the net value of that portion’ saved by them, as set forth in their libel, to be ascertained, by deducting from the sum of one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars, the agreed value thereof, the proper proportion of the costs and expenses, of this suit, and other expenses properly chargeable thereon, to be taxed and allowed by the court; and that the petitioners John Lowe and others have and recover for their services fifty per cent of the net value of that portion of the cargo saved by them, as set forth in their petition, to be ascertained in the same manner: the shares of the master and crew of the schooner Isabel to be forfeited for the use and benefit of the owners and insurers of the property.

[See Case No. 9,651.]
No. 62919.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 283497-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. E. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended July 31, 2008, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/  THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/  THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00361-CV

Accident Fund General Insurance Company

v.

Rodrigo Mendiola

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018CCV-62211-3

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 12, 2023
(Reap. Dec. 10862)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 706191-1/3, etc.

(Decided November 18, 1964)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*488Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have 'been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Count:

> 1. That 'the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 T.D. 197, T.D. 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seep).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reapraisement as to the values referred -to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. §162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.