alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THECHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

 

I, Kathleen Mason, the Chief Executive Officer ofTuesday Morning Corporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.             The quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofTuesday Morning Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2010 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in theabove-mentioned report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Tuesday Morning Corporation.

 

 
| Date: April 30, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Kathleen Mason                      |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Kathleen Mason  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-100
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 89

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 9, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Hermann Monument and Hermann Heights

Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, as a national symbol of

the contributions of Americans of German heritage.

Whereas there are currently more than 57,900,000 individuals of German heritage residing in the United States,

who comprise nearly 25 percent of the population of the

United States and are therefore the largest ethnic group

in the United States;
2

HCON 89 RFS

Whereas those of German heritage are not merely descendants of one political entity, but of all German speaking

areas;

Whereas numerous Americans of German heritage have made

countless contributions to American culture, arts, and industry, the American military, and American government;

Whereas there is no recognized tangible, national symbol

dedicated to German Americans and their positive contributions to the United States;

Whereas the story of Hermann the Cheruscan parallels that

of the American Founding Fathers, because he was a

freedom fighter who united ancient German tribes in

order to shed the yoke of Roman tyranny and preserve

freedom for the territory of present-day Germany;

Whereas the Hermann Monument located in Hermann

Heights Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, was dedicated in

1897 in honor of the spirit of freedom and later dedicated to all German immigrants who settled in New Ulm

and elsewhere in the United States; and

Whereas the Hermann Monument has been recognized as a

site of special historical significance by the United States

Government, by placement on the National Register of

Historic Places: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Hermann Monument and Hermann

3 Heights Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, are recognized by
3

HCON 89 RFS

1 the Congress to be a national symbol for the contributions

2 of Americans of German heritage.

Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
No. 64712.

#### Bar-Zel Expediters *v.*United States,

protest 59/31241 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to- overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 80

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 1999

    Mr. Dreier introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-62 is 
further amended by striking ``November 17, 1999'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 18, 1999''. Public Law 106-46 is 
amended by striking ``November 17, 1999'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``November 18, 1999''.
                                 <all>
```
**ANNUAL
      PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**LNR
      PARTNERS, INC.**





**Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 11, 2005**


**(the
      “Agreement”), by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation, as
      Depositor, Wachovia Bank, N. A.,**


**as
      Master Servicer, LaSalle Bank, N.A., as Trustee, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as Fiscal
      Agent,**


**and
      LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer**


**(LBUBS
      2005-C5)**








The
      undersigned, Susan K. Chapman, as Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc., a
      Florida Corporation (the “Company”), in accordance with Section 3.13 of the
      Agreement, hereby certifies on behalf of the Company that (i) a review of the
      activities of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2005 and of its
      performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, (ii) to
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has performed and
      fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Agreement in all material
      respects throughout such period ended December 31, 2005, (iii) the Company
      has
      received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any
      REMIC Pool as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust, from the IRS
      or
      any other governmental agency or body.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate
      as
      of the 1 st day of
      March, 2006.














/s/
      Susan K.
      Chapman


Susan
      K.
      Chapman


Vice
      President


LNR
      Partners,
      Inc.
**EXHIBIT      21.1**

**BOARDWALK      PIPELINE PARTNERS, LP**

**Subsidiaries      of the Registrant**

**December      31, 2005**

| **Name                of Subsidiary**          |   | **Organized                Under Laws of** | **Business                Names** |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                           |   |                                       |                              |
| Boardwalk                Operating GP, LLC     |   | Delaware                                   |                              |
| Boardwalk                Pipelines, LP         |   | Delaware                                   |                              |
| Texas                Gas Transmission, LLC     |   | Delaware                                   | Texas                Gas          |
| Gulf                South Pipeline Company, LP |   | Delaware                                   | Gulf                South         |
| GS                Pipeline Company, LLC        |   | Delaware                                   |                              |

----
Before the Third Division,

December 19, 1949

No. 53834.

#### Brauner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 145830-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When this case was called for trial there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. An examination of -the collector’s letter disclosed that the regulations were not complied with. In view of the noncompliance with the mandatory regulations, the protest was overruled, following *Maple Leaf Petroleum, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 5, T. D. 48976).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald W.
Hultgren, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/ Donald W. Hultgren               
|                  |  |  |  | Donald W. Hultgren                   
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**Certification
      by the Chief Financial Officer**


**of**


**Boardwalk
      GP, LLC**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(as
      adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief financial officer of Boardwalk
      GP, LLC hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the annual report
      on
      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, (the "Report") of Boardwalk
      Pipeline Partners, LP (the "Partnership") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Income of the
      Partnership.





February
      23, 2007


/ *s/
      Jamie L. Buskill*


Jamie
      L.
      Buskill


Chief
      Financial Officer


(principal
      financial officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, Rodger Weismann, Chief Financial Officer of Phase ForwardIncorporated (the “Company”), in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, herebycertifies pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

 

•  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

•  the information in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Thiscertification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to bedeemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.

 

 
| /s/ Rodger Weismann         |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Rodger  Weismann            |
| *Chief Financial Officer*   |
| Phase  Forward Incorporated |

 

November 14,2005

 

1

----
No. 59369.

protests 233652-K, etc. (New York).

#### Baeff & Vesely, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 58381.

protests 225338-K, etc. (New York).

#### Copeland & Thompson, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Abstract 57915, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51533.

#### Protests 87637-K, etc., of Louis M. Vordemberge et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case No. 8,941.

#### In re MAGEE.

[1 Wkly. Notes Cas. 21.]

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 7; 1874.

Bankruptcy — Practice—Application to Annul AnJUDICATJOX.

Application [by George R. Magee] to annul adjudication, all known creditors having assented thereto in writing, and no warrant haying issued.

THE COURT

ordered the vacation of the order of adjudication, upon proof of assent of all known creditors, and publication of the notice of the application for annulment.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

BRANDY GREENOUGH, Appellant, v. EBAY, INC., Appellee. No. 2D23-1180 February 23, 2024 Appeal from the County Court for Manatee County; Renee L. Inman, Judge. Brandy Greenough, pro se. Lauren R. Robertson of Holland & Knight, LLP, Tampa; and Jamie Billotte Moses of Holland & Knight, LLP, Orlando, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. VILLANTI, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
October 27, 1955

No. 59396.

Suit 4713.

#### Wilbur-Ellis Company *v.*United States.

Abstract 55884. (Appeal dismissed on motion September 15, 1955.)
FORREST A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC.INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSULTANS
  5310 HARVEST HILL ROAD, SUITE 275, LB 152
  DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 - 5805
  (972)788-1110 Telefax (972)991-3160 (E MAIL) forgarb@forgarb.comCONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM EXPERT


| |                                                                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Forrest A. Garb & Associates, Inc.                                              
| |                                                                                 
| | W.D. Harriss III
      Chief Executive OfficerForrest A. Garb & Associates, Inc.
| |                                                                                 
| |                                                                                 
| |                                                                                 
| |
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. NO. 33,884 4 OMAR ENRIQUE GONZALEZ, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 7 Darren M. Kugler, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 12 Santa Fe, NM 13 Sergio J. Viscoli, Assi stant Appellate Defender 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 VANZI, Judge. 182 {1} Defendant appeals from a district c ourt order revoking his probation and re1 sentencing him. We issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm. Defendant has 2 responded with a memorandum in opposition. We affirm. 3
{2} Defendant continues to challenge the district court sentence, which was 4 imposed after Defendant did not contest that he violated probation. Sentences are 5 reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and there is no abuse of discretion where the 6 sentence imposed is one that is authorized by law. See State v. Cumpton , 2000- 7 NMCA-033, ¶ 10, 129 N.M. 47, 1 P.3d 429. 8
{3} Defendant has abandoned issue B. [MIO 3] See State v. Johnson , 1988-NMCA9 029, ¶ 8, 107 N.M. 356, 758 P.2d 306. We do not address this argument further, 10 except to note that we remain persuaded th at summary affirmance is appropriate based 11 on the analysis in our notice. 12
{4} Defendant has continued to argue that the district court relied on 13 misinformation and denied him the opportunity to correct the error. Specifically, 14 Defendant claims that the judge stated, “He has already killed one person” as the 15 judge walked away from the bench. [MIO 3] It does not appear that this comment is 16 part of the record and therefore isnot subject to review on appeal. See In re Aaron L ., 17 2000-NMCA-024, ¶ 27, 128 N.M. 641, 996 P.2d 431. In addition, Defendant did not 18 include any alleged correction in his motion for reconsideration, which was denied by 193 the district court. [RP 129, 131] Accordingly, we affirm the district court judgment 1 and sentence. 2

{5} IT IS SO ORDERED. 3

__________________________________ 4 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 5

WE CONCUR: 6

_________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 8

_________________________________ 9 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 10
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 14

Designating Monday, January 3, 2000, as the day for the observance of

the New Year’s Day holiday in that year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. LINDER (for himself and Mr. DREIER) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating Monday, January 3, 2000, as the day for the

observance of the New Year’s Day holiday in that year.

Whereas the problem commonly referred to as the ‘‘Year

2000 computer problem’’ may undermine the ability of

computers to function correctly, and cause a disruption

in business, government, and other important services;

and

Whereas January 1, 2000, occurs on a Saturday, and hence,

in accordance with applicable provisions of law, the New

Year’s Day holiday would, but for this resolution, be observed on Friday, December 31, 1999: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HJ 14 IH

1 That, in order to provide the public and technology profes2 sionals with an additional day, prior to the start of the

3 workweek, to begin repairs on failed computer systems

4 caused by the Year 2000 computer problem, the New

5 Year’s Day holiday in the year 2000 shall be deemed to

6 occur on January 3, 2000 (rather than the date that

7 would otherwise apply under section 6103(a) of title 5,

8 United States Code).

Æ
May 20, 2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable John F. Kerry

Secretary of State

US Department of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, DC 20520

Dear Secretary Foxx and Secretary Kerry:

Visit Baltimore believes strongly that Open Skies agreements should be preserved. By providing more 

competition and increased capacity and choices in the air travel market, these agreements benefit

individual consumers, the entire travel industry and America's economy through visitor spending, tax 

generation and job creation. They are essential to ensure continued growth in international travel to and 

from the U.S. including destinations like Baltimore.

International leisure visitors already account for 9% of Baltimore’s $5.15 billion visitor economy. Thanks 

to local infrastructure investments and the addition of new routes and new carriers at regional airports, 

Baltimore is poised to share its East Coast accessibility, history, culture and charm with even more 

international visitors. We need your support to continue this positive momentum.

An important factor driving recent increases in overall inbound international travel has been the increased 

competition from new service and new entrants into the American market from places like India, the 

Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia. Targeting these centers of global aviation and airlines like 

Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways puts the entire Open Skies framework at risk. We need these carriers 

to help bring travelers to Baltimore and destinations throughout the country for business and leisure 

purposes.

I urge you not to limit the Gulf carriers' access to the U.S. Preserve Open Skies.

Submitted respectfully,

Tom Noonan

President & CEO