alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS REPORT

NBS PROJECT NBS REPORT

1002-12-10421 February 20, 1963 7802

Fourteenth Progress

Report

on the

Mechanisms of Fire Ignition and Extinguishment

by

E. C. Creitz

Covering the period 1 November 1962 to 31 January 1963

for

Bureau of Ships

Department of the Navy

Code 638

NATIONAL BUREAU OF

for use within the Governmei and review. For this reason, whole or in part, is not au Bureau of Standards, Washi

the Report has been specific

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Approved for public release by the

Director of the National Institute of

Standards and Technology (NIST)

on October 9, 2015.

ogress accounting documents intended

it is subjected to additional evaluation

iture listing of this Report, either in

1 the Office of the Director, National

r, by the Government agency for which

nal copies for its own use.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
-
Fourteenth Progress Report

Mechanisms of Fire Ignition and Extinguishment

by

E. C. Creitz

Covering the period 1 November 1962 to 31 January 1963

1 . Summary

A new ion source, particularly adapted to the production

of ions from low energy electrons has been designed and

partially constructed- New calculations have been made on a

scheme in which velocity modulation can be used to improve

resolution and duty cycle. Velocity modulation was the

limiting factor in the previous design.

2. The Mass Spectrometer

Mr. Mills has designed a new electron bombardment ion

source. It has essentially cylindrical symmetry with the

electron source at the center. This design should result in

improved ion production efficiency since electrons can travel

away from their source in many directions instead of along a

single straight line as in most conventional designs as is

required in instruments using a collimated beam and narrow

slits. The new source should be especially useful in the

study of the appearance potentials of ions formed by the

attachment of low energy electrons. The inner parts of the

new source were built during the quarter and drawings prepared

for the outer vacuum shell.

In earlier calculations on the theory of operation of the

mass spectrometer, velocity modulation was neglected. Calculations made during the quarter indicated it to be a limiting

factor on resolution and on duty cycle, which is related to

sensitivity. New calculations on line shapes and duty cycles

have been made in which the effects of velocity modulation

can be utilized to improve resolution.

USCOMM*NBS-DC
** *
Opinion issued July 22 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 20
- 005 52
- CV

——————————— IN RE TRI POINTE HOMES TEXAS, INC . F/K/A TRENDMAKER HOMES, INC. , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION Relator, Tri Pointe Homes Texas, Inc. f/k/a Trendmaker Homes, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order by the trial court appointing an arbitrator. 1 Relator asserts that the parties’ agreements require arbitration of the

1 The underlying case is Randall B. Lee and Amy Jo Wagner v. Trendmaker Homes, Inc., cause number 19

- DCV

- 26 8791 , pending in the 400th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Tameika Carter presiding.2

dispute to be conducted by a specific arbitration administrator rather than the arbitrator selected by the court. Because the challenged order was issued by the former trial court judg e, this original proceeding was abated for the successor trial court judge to reconsider the order. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 7.2(b). The successor judge subsequently issued an order denying reconsideration of the challenged order. Accordingly, we reinstate the original proceeding on the Court’s active docket. Upon consideration of the challenged order and the successor judge’s order denying reconsideration, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Countiss

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                         221,536
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,128
<PP&E>                                       1,091,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                 116,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,367,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,764
<BONDS>                                        566,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           420
<OTHER-SE>                                     522,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,367,824
<SALES>                                        166,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,920
<CGS>                                           56,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,746
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CHESTER VALLEY BANCORP INC
                            ANNOUNCES 5% INCREASE IN
                             QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2003

CONTACT:   JOSEPH T. CROWLEY
           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           (610) 269-9700


Downingtown - Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. announced the declaration of a $.105
quarterly cash dividend, an increase of 5%. The dividend will be paid on
December 15, 2003 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on
December 8, 2003. The cash dividend is based on record earnings of $1.5 million
or $.30 per diluted share for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. At September
30, 2003, the Company had assets of $598.3 million and stockholders' equity of
$49.9 million.

Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. is the parent company of both First Financial Bank
and Philadelphia Corporation for Investment Services. First Financial Bank's
executive offices are located in Downingtown, Pennsylvania with additional
branch locations in Exton, Frazer, Thorndale, Westtown, Airport Village,
Brandywine Square, Devon, Kennett Square and Eagle. Philadelphia Corporation has
offices in Wayne and Philadelphia.

Chester Valley Bancorp stock is traded on the NASDAQ market under the symbol
"CVAL".
No. 57124.

protest 188790-K (Philadelphia).

#### John Wanamaker, Phila. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of china figures or figurines similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended January 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/  THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident and

Chief Executive Officer/s/  THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer 52
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ClearStory Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Report"), Stephen A. Read, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 12, 2005


/S/ STEPHEN A. READ
----------------------------------------
Stephen A. Read
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Sergio Assenco  Tavares dos Santos,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

         (i) the annual report of Tele Centro Oeste Celular  Participacoes  S.A.
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (ii) the  information  contained  in such  annual  report  on Form 20-F
fairly presents in all material respects the financial  condition and results of
operations of Tele Centro Oeste Celular Participacoes S.A.

Date: June 30, 2003

                                          /S/ SERGIO ASSENCO TAVARES DOS SANTOS
                                          -------------------------------------
                                           Sergio Assenco Tavares dos Santos
                                                       President
-                      -                        -  Gestion des urgences 
                      - Gestion des risques
                      -  Gestion des risques 
                      -  Hurricane, Wind & Water Surge Hazards                          -  Planification et intervention en cas d'ouragan 
                        -  Réduction de l'impact des tempêtes de vent 
                      -  Planification de l'atténuation des risques 
                      -  Climate Resilience 
                      -  Sciences du bâtiment 
                      -  Risque de tremblement de terre 
                      -  Sécurité des barrages 
                      -  Capacités d'intervention en cas de danger 
                      -  Préparation nationale 
                      -  Outils pour les praticiens 
                      -  Individus et communautés 

          This page has not been translated into Français. Visit the Français page for resources in that language.        

# Hurricane, Wind & Water Surge Hazards

                            - English 

High winds and water surges often are associated with:
                            - Hurricanes
                            - Storms
                            - Straight-line Winds
                            - Tornadoes
                            - Tsunamis

FEMA helps communities prepare for, respond to and recover from  the risks that come from hurricanes, high winds and storm surges. 

Our agency also collaborates with partners and organizations at the state, local and federal levels to develop the tools, data and outreach our nation needs and deserves.

## Programs

### Hurricane Planning and Response

The National Hurricane Program provides data, resources and technical assistance for hurricane evacuation planning and response for state, local, tribal, territorial and federal government partners. Hurricane evacuation and response planning efforts span from steady-state deliberate planning to operational decision support and crisis planning when hurricanes threaten the United States.

### National Windstorm Impact Reduction Program

The National Windstorm Impact Reduction Program works to reduce losses from windstorms through a coordinated federal effort. FEMA supports the program by assisting with the development of risk assessment tools and mitigation techniques, data collection and analysis, and public outreach and information dissemination.

## Resources

### Building Science Publications

Visit the Building Science resource library for FEMA’s collection of hazard-specific guidance that focuses on creating disaster-resistance communities.

### Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to Frequently Asked Questions about high winds.

### FloodSmart.gov

Rebuilding after a hurricane can be difficult enough without the added financial hardships that can come with flood damage. Speak to an insurance agent about a flood insurance policy to make sure you are protected from costly damages.

Retour en haut
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00325

- CR

Omar Fahmawi

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 3

o f Tarrant County (1421857D )

July 20, 2017

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
An equal opportunity employer 1220 L Street, Northwest Russell White

Washington, DC 20005

- 4070 Health Sciences Manager

Tel 202

- 682

- 8344

Fax 202

- 682

- 8270

whiter@api.org

August 31 , 2012

Byron J. Bunker,

Acting Division Director

Compliance Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality US Environmental Protection Agency 2000 Traverwood

Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation:

Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics of Tertiary Butyl Alcohol in Male Rats : Pilot Study.

RTI/0209408.004 August 20, 2012

Dear Mr. Bunker :

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG),

is submitting the following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b)

Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

 Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics of Tertiary Butyl Alcohol in Male Rats : Pilot

Study. RTI/0209408.004 August 20, 2012

EPA ’ s comments on the draft report for this pilot study (F. S. Hau c hman to M. T. Oge, March

31, 2009) were inc or porated into this final report.

The RG wants to inform EPA that t he definitive pharmacokinetic studies planned for Tertiary

Butyl Alcohol will not be conducted as the potential sponsor of this study, Lyondell Chemical

Company, a LyondellBasell co mpany, ha s declined to support additional research

.

If you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please

contact me.

Regards,

Russell D. White

Enclosures on CD : Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics of Tertiary Butyl Alcohol in Male Rats : Pilot Study. RTI/0209408.004 August 20, 2012

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 7139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3065]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Public Availability of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board; 
FY 2010 Service Contract Inventory Analysis/FY 2011 Service Contract 
Inventory

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB).

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2010 Service Contract 
Inventory Analysis and FY 2011 Service Contract Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), DNFSB is 
publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of (1) 
its analysis of the FY 2010 Service Contract inventory and (2) the FY 
2011 Service Contract inventory.
    Both the FY 2010 analysis and the FY 2011 inventory have been 
developed in accordance with guidance issued on December 19, 2011, by 
the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement 
Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventory-guidance.pdf.
    The FY 2011 inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2011. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency.
    DNFSB has posted its FY 2010 analysis and FY 2011 inventory and a 
summary of the inventory on the DNFSB homepage at the following link: 
http://www.dnfsb.gov/open.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Mark Welch at 202-694-7043 or 
Mailbox@dnfsb.gov.

    Dated: February 6, 2012.
Debra H. Richardson,
Deputy General Manager.
[FR Doc. 2012-3065 Filed 2-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & 
Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 2, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 25, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & Parcel 
Select Contract 1 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available 
at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-25, CP2024-25.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24148 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case No. 8,907.

#### In re McNAIR.

[2 N. B. R. 219 (Quarto, 77).]1

District Court, D. North Carolina.

1868.

Bankruptcy — Witness Fees.

A bankrupt summoned by creditor to appear as witness is not entitled to witness’s fees.

[Cited in Re Paddock, Case No. 10,058.]

[See Case No. 8,908.]

The following question arose, and was stated and agreed to by John D. Shaw, for bankrupt, and John W. Hinsdale, for J. J. Gilchrist, creditor, viz.: “Is a bankrupt attending before the court of bankruptcy for examination, entitled to the fees of a witness?”

The facts are: On the 6th day of May, 1868, Neill A. McNair, the above bankrupt, was ordered to appear before me at Fayette-ville, N. C., on the 22d day of May, 1868, to be examined touching his said bankruptcy. In obedience to said order, on the said 22d day of May, the said bankrupt appeared before me, and was on examination two days. At the close of his examination the said bankrupt demanded of J. J. Gilchrist, the creditor, upon whose application the order for examination was issued, the usual fees allowed to witnesses attending the federal courts, which demand the said creditor declined to recognize, raising the question through his attorney, John W. Hinsdale, whether a bankrupt attending before courts of bankruptcy for examination, is entitled to the fees of a witness, when he is ordered to appear to be examined relative to any matter concerning his bankruptcy.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

BROOKS, District Judge.

At Elizabeth City, in the district of North Carolina, on the 5th day of October, 1S68, this question is considered, presented by the certificate of Mr. Register Guthrie, of the 23d May, 1868: Is a bankrupt, when ordered to appear for examination in regard to his bankruptcy, at the instance of a creditor, entitled from such creditor to fees, as any other witness would be entitled to recover, for such attendance? I do not doubt as to the proper answer to be given to this question. The bankrupt summoned, or ordered, at the instance of a creditor, to be examined in reference to his bankruptcy, is not entitled to any compensation or fees for complying with such order from such creditor. Such a party does not stand as any other witness would, but he is expressly made subject to the order of the court, to be examined, when and where the court may direct, not as an ordinary witness, but it is one of the conditions that he shall do this if required; which entitles him to his discharge in the end, if no fraud is found against him.
No. 60330.

protests 214130-K, etc. (New York).

#### Armand Schwab & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly*& *Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 99.2  -  Report of Management as to compliance with minimum
		 servicing standards for the year ended December 31, 2005


[HOMEQ SERVICING logo]




				MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, HomEq Servicing Corporation
(the "Company") complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period,	the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policy both in the amount of $20 million.

HomeEq Servicing Corporation				February 24, 2006
/s/ Arthur Q. Lyon					Date
Arthur Q. Lyon
President


/s/ Keith G. Becher					February 24, 2006
Keith G. Becher						Date
Chief Operating Officer