alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Once issued, decisions from today’s meeting can be found at https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/commmeet/2020/ca02-20-20.asp

Presentations, Statements & News Releases can be found at: 

https://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventDetails.aspx?ID=13579&CalType=%20&CalendarID=101&Date=2

/1/2020&View=Listview

FERC Open Commission Meeting

February 20, 2020

Staff Presentation Items: E-19, E-22

Good morning Mr. Chairman and Commissioners,

Item E-19 is a draft Notice of Inquiry (NOI) seeking comments on the potential 

benefits and risks associated with the use of virtualization and cloud computing 

services in association with bulk electric system operations, as well as whether 

barriers exist in the Commission-approved Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) 

Reliability Standards that impede the voluntary adoption of virtualization or cloud 

computing services. The draft NOI seeks to build on the record concerning the 

potential benefits and risks associated with the adoption of virtualization and cloud 

computing services for bulk electric system operations that were raised in discussions

at the Commission’s June 27, 2019 Reliability Technical Conference and the March 28, 

2019 Commission/Department of Energy Security Investments for Energy 

Infrastructure Technical Conference.

The draft NOI seeks comments on four general topics: the scope of the potential use 

of virtualization and cloud computing services, the potential benefits and risks 

associated with virtualization and cloud computing services, the potential 

impediments to adopting virtualization and cloud computing services resulting from 

the CIP Reliability Standards, and potential new and emerging technologies beyond 

virtualization and cloud computing that responsible entities may be interested in 

adopting. 

Item E-22 is a draft Order directing the North American Electric Reliability 

Corporation (NERC) to submit an informational filing describing the activity of two 
2

NERC CIP standard drafting projects pertaining to virtualization and cloud computing 

services. Specifically, the draft Order directs NERC to submit a schedule for Project 

2016-02 (Modifications to CIP Standards) and Project 2019-02 (BES Cyber System 

Information Access Management). The draft Order further directs that each schedule 

should include the current status of the project, interim target dates, and the 

anticipated filing date for new or modified Reliability Standards. The draft Order 

requires NERC to submit the informational filing within 30 days of the date of issuance 

of this order, as well as quarterly status updates, on an informational basis, until such 

time as new or modified Reliability Standards are filed with the Commission.

That concludes our presentation. We would be happy to answer any questions.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**AMERICAN
      TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr.
      Gary
      Fromm, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




Date:
      6/19/07




/s/
                Dr. Gary FrommDr.
                Gary Fromm
              CHAIRMAN
                OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                OFFICER
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 5

Recognizing the severity of the issue of cervical health, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the severity of the issue of cervical health, and

for other purposes.

Whereas cervical cancer annually strikes an estimated 15,000

women in the United States;

Whereas during an average woman’s lifetime cervical cancer

strikes one out of every 50 American women;

Whereas it is estimated that during this decade more than

150,000 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in

the United States;

Whereas according to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and

End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute,

when cervical cancer is detected at an early stage, the

five-year survival rate is 91 percent;

Whereas cervical cancer is a preventable disease yet is one of

the leading causes of death among American women;
2

•HCON 5 IH

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention, the mortality rate among American women

with cervical cancer declined during the period 1960

through 1997, but now has begun to rise; and

Whereas cervical cancer survivors have shown tremendous

courage and determination in the face of adversity: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the severity of the issue of cer4 vical health;

5 (2) calls on the Unites States as a whole to

6 support both the individuals with cervical cancer as

7 well as the family and loved ones of individuals with

8 cervical cancer through public awareness and edu9 cation; and

10 (3) calls on the people of the United States to

11 take this opportunity to learn about cervical cancer

12 and how they can lower their likelihood for develop13 ing cervical cancer and ensure early detection.

Æ
ARTISOFT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             EXHIBIT 11. COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                                   March 31,               March  31,
                                             1999          1998        1999        1998
                                             ----          ----        ----        ----
<S>                                        <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>
Net income (loss)                          $   (580)     $   (162)   $ (1,142)    $ 1,374
                                           ========      ========    ========     =======

  Basic EPS-Weighted average common
    shares outstanding                       14,764        14,539      14,705      14,529
                                           ========      ========    ========     =======

  Basic net income (loss) per share        $   (.04)     $   (.01)      $(.08)       $.09
                                           ========      ========    ========     =======

  Effect of diluted securities:
      Stock options                              --(1)       --(1)         --(1)       47
                                           --------      --------    --------     -------

  Diluted EPS-Weighted average shares
    outstanding                              14,764        14,539      14,705      14,576
                                           ========      ========    ========     =======

  Stock options not included in diluted
    EPS since anti-dilutive                     318            68          85          --
                                           ========      ========    ========     =======

  Diluted net income (loss) per share      $   (.04)      $  (.01)   $   (.08)    $   .09
                                           ========      ========    ========     =======
</TABLE>

Notes:

(1)  Common share  equivalents  are  anti-dilutive  for the three month  periods
     ended  March 31, 1998 and 1999,  respectively,  and the  nine-month  period
     ended March 31,  1999,  therefore,  basic and diluted net loss per share is
     the same.

                                       25
## APR 2 9 2013 Before the U.S. Department of Transportation H



### ~~ Rf N 

### ~ ~~(~K~~ Federal Aviation Administration

) 

### In the matter of ) ) FDMS No. FAA-2012-1260 TRANS TIME EXPRESS ) FAA Case No. 2011SW700220 ) The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder

)



### JOINT MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIfE PROCEDURAI. SCHEDULE Pursuant to the Chief Judge's December 21, 2012, procedural order, the parties on January 22, 2013 proposed that Apri126, 2013 be the deadline for discovery completion and that May 31, 2013 be the deadline for the filing of stipulations, witness liats and the exchange of exhibits. At this time, discovery is ongoing and the parties are in settlement talks in an attempt to conclude this matter prior to hearing. Due to the fact that all requested discovery materials have not been received by Complainant, the parties request the deadlines be extended such that discovery concludes on May 31, 2013 and the exchange of hearing materials occurs by June 28, 2013.WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully requests that the Chief Administrative

Law Judge grant Complainant's motion for an extension of the procedural schedule. Respectfully submitted, Peter Lynch Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement

By:

~ . - 

# C;
Charles Raley, Attorney Enforcenent Division, AGC-300 Office of the Chief Counsel Eederal Aviatiion Administration 800Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Phone: (202)267-3357 Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 Email: charles.raley@faa.gov

Dated: Apri123, 2013Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on this date I have placed in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified return-receipt, and by electronic transmission, a copy of Complainant's Joint 

### Motion for and Extension of the Procedural Schedule In the Matter 

### of Trans Time Express, FDMS No. FAA-2012-1260, FAA Case no. 2011 S W700220, addressed to:

Cameron Niakan, Esq. 10101 Grosvenor Pl. #620 Rockville, MD 20852 In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified return-receipt and facsimile one copy of the foregoing document to:

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder Chief Administrative Law Judge U.S. Departrnent of Transportation Office of Hearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Facsimile: 202-366-7536 In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified return-receipt, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing document to:

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building — Suite 2 W 1000

Dated: AprIl 23, 2013
H. Con. Res. 394 Agreed to September 13, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1374) to authorize

the development and maintenance of a multiagency campus project

in the town of Jackson, Wyoming, the Secretary of the Senate

shall make the following corrections:

(1) In section 1, strike ‘‘1999’’ and insert ‘‘2000’’.

(2) In section 5(a), strike ‘‘section 3’’ and insert ‘‘section

4’’.

(3) In section 7(a)(1), strike ‘‘memorandum of agreement

referred to in section 4(a)(1)(A)’’ and insert ‘‘memorandum of

understanding referred to in section 4(a)(1)(B)’’.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 19167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07710]

[[Page 19167]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 371]

Delegation of Authority Under Section 13(r)(5) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and the Presidential Memorandum of October 
9, 2012, I hereby delegate to the Under Secretary for Political Affairs 
and the Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs, to the 
extent authorized by law, the functions set forth in section 13(r)(5) 
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (codified at 15 
U.S.C. 78m(r)(5)(A)).
    This delegation of authority does not include the authority to make 
determinations that an issuer is to be sanctioned, impose sanctions, or 
exercise any related waiver authorities with respect to any issuer (or 
any affiliate of the issuer).
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding any provision of this Delegation of Authority, the 
Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management 
and Resources, and the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and 
the Environment, may at any time exercise any function delegated by 
this delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: January 9, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-07710 Filed 4-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 2 5 , 2016

p0414 

# Order

Clerk April 2 5 , 2016

151601 & (23)(28)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151601

COA: 323688

Wayne CC: 11

- 003355

- FC

QUAN DORSEY, 11

- 003356

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant. 11

- 003357

- FC

11

- 003361

- FC

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motions to remand and for summary disposition are DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Li3 Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luis Saenz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Luis SaenzName:
Luis SaenzTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
October 6, 2011
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 45

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the crypt beneath the

rotunda of the Capitol in connection with memorial services to be conducted in the Supreme Court Building for the late honorable Harry

A. Blackmun, former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the

United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1999

Mr. THOMAS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

MARCH 9, 1999

The Committee on House Administration discharged; considered and

agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the crypt

beneath the rotunda of the Capitol in connection with

memorial services to be conducted in the Supreme Court

Building for the late honorable Harry A. Blackmun,

former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the

United States.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer to the custody of the Chief

4 Justice of the United States the catafalque which is situ-
2

•HCON 45 ATH

1 ated in the crypt beneath the rotunda of the Capitol so

2 that such catafalque may be used in the Supreme Court

3 Building in connection with services to be conducted there

4 for the late honorable Harry A. Blackmun, former Associ5 ate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Æ
**WQS Regulatory Clarifications --**  **D iscussion with AC**  **W A**  **Friday, October 14, 2011 ,**  **11 :00**  **am –**  **12 :30 pm**  **(ET) EPA Headquarters**  **(conference call) Attendees:** 
 **EPA OW -**  **OST :**  Grace Robiou, Manjali Vlcan, Christina Christensen, Sara Hisel
McCoy , Ephraim King  **States:** Vermont, Maine, NEWI PI C, New Hampshire, New Jersey , New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, South Carolina, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, L ou i siana, Iowa, Nebraska, Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Californ ia, Arizona, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Arkansas, Rhode Island. **Topics covered:**
 Summarized proposed regulatory revisions  Summarized input received from states  Summarized resulting changes made as a result of state input  Answered questions from states  Provided overview of next steps and timeline
LONG CHAIN CHLORINATED PARAFFIN PRODUCTS SOLD TO LUBRICANT INDUSTRY

 TRUCK UNLOADING TO STORAGE

 TOTE UNLOADING 

(150 kg/batch)

BASE OIL AND VARIETY OF OTHER ADDITIVES(850 kg/batch)

 CUSTOMER PERSONNEL EXPOSURE POINT

 NO RELEASE POINT OCCURS IN PROCESS

CPAR

STORAGE

(LUBRICANTS)

FORMULATION

MIXING

(1,000 kg/batch)

END PRODUCT 

PACKAGING

END PRODUCT 

LUBRICANT SALES

X

A

PRODUCT SOLD BY

TRUCK FOR LUBRICANT

FORMULATION

C

PRODUCT SOLD BY

TOTE FOR LUBRICANT

FORMULATION

B
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 19, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 11, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
72 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-6, CP2024-6.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-23022 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 47 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 47

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 47

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds 
on July 10, 1999, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, and 
solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be 
carried out under this resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```