alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15
 CONSULTING AGREEMENT
 VICOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC T.J. BOHANNON, INC.
  Duties and Responsibilities
 Term
 Consulting Fee
    Termination
 Return of the Companys Property
 - 1 -




---



##### 



Confidentiality
 Notices
 If to the Consultant:
 
 If to the Company:
 
  Assignment
 Authority
 Indemnification
 Waiver, Governing Law, Venue
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Validity, Integration, Oral Termination, Modification
 Exhibits and Headings
 Attorneys Fees
 Continuing Obligations
  - 3 -




---



##### 



IN WITNESS HEREOF,
 VICOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:
    /s/ David H. FaterDavid H. FaterChief Executive OfficerT.J. BOHANNON, INC.By:
    /s/ T.J. BohannonT.J. Bohannon, President - 4 -
EXHIBIT 10.22
                                                                   -------------



                                    Agreement

     This Agreement is entered into as of August 4th , 2003, by and between
Extended Systems of Idaho, Inc., an Idaho corporation (the "Company"), and Ray
Smelek ("Smelek").

     Whereas, Smelek has served the Company for many years as an employee,
officer and director;

     Now, therefore, the Company and Smelek hereby agree as follows:

     1.   Benefits. Upon termination of Smelek's employment by the Company, the
Company will pay Smelek the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500)
in lieu of fringe benefits.

     2.   Exercise of Stock Options. Smelek will continue to have the right to
exercise each stock option granted to him by the Company until the earlier of:
(i) the date twelve (12) months after termination of his service as a director
or employee of the Company; or (ii) the date of expiration of such stock option
according to the option agreement pursuant to which it was granted.

     3.   General. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding between
the parties and supersedes any prior agreements or understandings, express or
implied, pertaining to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho
without reference to its choice of law principles. This Agreement shall be
binding on the parties and their successors and assigns. No modification or
waiver of this Agreement will be effective unless evidenced in a writing signed
by both parties.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

Extended Systems Incorporated

By    /s/ Karla K Rosa                               By /s/ Raymond A. Smelek
  -------------------------                             ---------------------

Title  VP of Finance and CFO                         Raymond A. Smelek
       ---------------------
No. 59389.

protest 236929-K (Philadelphia).

#### Durlacher & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves and squares similar in all material, respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated January 29, 1999 included in Sirrom Capital Corporation and
subsidiaries annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1998 incorporated by reference in or made part of this registration statement.
 
                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                          Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Nashville, Tennessee
March 1, 1999
# L_2022195EN.01009001.xml

| 22.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 195/90

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/1283

of 15 July 2022

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications

‘Μακαρόνια της Σμίλας/Makaronia tis Smilas/Μακαρόνια του Σκλινιτζιού/Makaronia tou Sklinitziou’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Cyprus’s application to register the name ‘Μακαρόνια της Σμίλας/Makaronia tis Smilas/Μακαρόνια του Σκλινιτζιού/Makaronia tou Sklinitziou’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Cyprus’s application to register the name ‘Μακαρόνια της Σμίλας/Makaronia tis Smilas/Μακαρόνια του Σκλινιτζιού/Makaronia tou Sklinitziou’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Μακαρόνια της Σμίλας/Makaronia tis Smilas/Μακαρόνια του Σκλινιτζιού/Makaronia tou Sklinitziou’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Μακαρόνια της Σμίλας/Makaronia tis Smilas/Μακαρόνια του Σκλινιτζιού/Makaronia tou Sklinitziou’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Μακαρόνια της Σμίλας/Makaronia tis Smilas/Μακαρόνια του Σκλινιτζιού/Makaronia tou Sklinitziou’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.5. – pasta, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 131, 24.3.2022, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 14

- 00146

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.A. , a Child From the 73rd Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000EM502104 Honorable Eric Rodrig uez , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 30, 2014 MOTION DENIED AS MOOT ; DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION On March 3, 2014, appellant Susan Idalia Anderson Costner filed a “Motion for Leave to File Late Notice of Appeal” in this court. However, no notice of appeal appears to have been filed in the trial court or in this court. This court’s jurisdiction is invoked by the timely filing of a notice of appeal. Molina v. Housing Authority of the City of San Antonio , No. 04

- 04

- 00774

- CV, 2004 WL 2715903, *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec. 1, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op.); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1(b). Because it appeared app ellant did not file a notice of appeal, we ordered her to file a written response in this court on or before April 11, 2014, establishing that she has timely filed a notice of appeal and thereby invoked this court’s jurisdiction. We advised that i f appell ant fail ed to satisfactorily04

- 14

- 00146

- CV respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response. Accordingly, we hold appellant has not invoked this court’s jurisdict ion , and we: (1) deny her motion for leave to file late notice of appeal as moot , and (2) dismiss the appeal. See Molina v. Housing Authority of the City of San Antonio , No. 04

- 04

- 00774

- CV, 2004 WL 2715903, *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec. 1, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op.); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1(b).

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
Presidential Determination No. 2023-13 of September 29, 2023

# Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2024

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, in accordance with section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the “Act”) (8 U.S.C. 1157), and after appropriate consultations with the Congress, I hereby make the following determinations and authorize the following actions:

The admission of up to 125,000 refugees to the United States during Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.

The admissions numbers shall be allocated among refugees of special humanitarian concern to the United States in accordance with the following regional allocations:

Africa
30,000-50,000East Asia
10,000-20,000Europe and Central Asia
2,000-3,000Latin America/Caribbean
35,000-50,000Near East/South Asia
30,000-45,000


The above allocation ranges are intended to provide flexibility as needs arise, but the total admissions among all of the regions may not exceed 125,000. Upon providing notification to the Judiciary Committees of the Congress, you are hereby authorized to transfer unused admissions allocated to a particular region to one or more other regions, if there is a need for greater admissions for the region or regions to which the admissions are being transferred.

Consistent with section 2(b)(2) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (22 U.S.C. 260l(b)(2)), I hereby determine that assistance to or on behalf of persons applying for admission to the United States as part of the overseas refugee admissions program will contribute to the foreign policy interests of the United States and designate such persons for this purpose.

Consistent with section 10l(a)(42) of the Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(42)), and after appropriate consultation with the Congress, I also specify that, for FY 2024, the following persons may, if otherwise qualified, be considered refugees for the purpose of admission to the United States within their countries of nationality or habitual residence:

1. Persons in Cuba;

2. Persons in Eurasia and the Baltics;

3. Persons in Iraq;

4. Persons in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras; and

5. In certain circumstances, persons identified by a United States Embassy in any location.

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the 
                        *Federal Register*.



[FR Doc. 2023-23733 Billing code 4710-10-P
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-092
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
No. 67695.

#### National Silver Company *v.*United States,

protests 61/4830 and 61/4831 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers .the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R.*Co. *a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

June 30, 2017

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2017

155428-9(71)

KATIE BARKER, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of PERRY PACE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155428

v COA: 328584

Genesee CC: 13-100524-NH

HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER, DR. JOHN DOE,

DENIKA LLOYD, NURSE 1 JANE DOE,

NURSE 2 JANE DOE, and NURSE 3 JANE DOE,

Defendants,

and

DR. PATRICK HAWLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________

KATIE BARKER, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of PERRY PACE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155429

v COA: 328997

Ct of Claims: 13-000072-MH

THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, d/b/a

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH

CENTER, d/b/a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 

HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

submitted on June 27, 2017, is accepted for filing.
Ms. Aloha Ley 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New .Jersey Ave., SE, W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Docket DOT -OST -2012-0069 

Sarasota Bradenton International Airport (SRQ) 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

I am writing as Director of Sales ~t Jhe Hyatt Place Sarasot<:t/Sradenton Airport Hctei to express 

our strong support for the above referenced grant application to the Small Community Air 

Service Development Program. The recent decision by Southwest Airlines to puli AirTran 

service from SRQ is a major blow to the air service and economic competitiveness .:>f the entire 

region served by Sarasota Bradenton International Airport. AirTran accounted for over 360,000 

passengers or nearly 30% of all passenger traffic at SRQ in 2011. It was -especially a blow to 

our own hotel~ for we have housed their crew since May 1, 2009 aftt;,r opening our doors 

in December: 2008 whicb,,certainly helped us as a new hotal during a time in which travel 

was at a low•;· .. · .. · ;.;;:· . ... .. 

, .:::,' "··~ ... ~-;· ·;·· .... -··(··;·:~. .· ··:,~.~ .. 'f'\:.~-0 ... t·r·r\··.; 

Sarasota.: Bradenton: alsq:>.sutfers, from a lack of e1ccess to a westbound airline gateway. This 

forces !oc~kCQJJst.llllef~~ t01 driye . .tQ.,other airports, thereby ir.f!icting economic damage on the 

local· economy. . . . .. 

A 1997 Economic,• lmpachStudy· completed ~s part of the SHQ Master Plan Update revealed 

that 57% of all enplanements at SRQ were out of area visitorg spending 11n average of $665.00· 

oer visit. Using the CY 2011 AirTran passeng~r traffic, this equates to ·J02,600 visitors to the 

SRQ area. When combined with the ·1 001000 passengers loet due to no wastbound service, this 

equates to a !oss of over $1CC,OOO,OOO of ~Jl@.21 visitor .:.•xpenditures. ·annually. When the 

multiplier effect is factorf-Jd in, it equates to a loss of nearly $285,000,000 of economic impact 

and 2,600 jobs to the area. 

The community is partnering with the airport to match ti1e grant funds .dollar for doliar ·on this 

critical matter. . We ask the Department considar the serious negative effects the recent 

approval providF.!d to Southwest Airlines to acquire AirTran /\.irways has had on our community 

and approve the application for assistance. Thank you for your: consideration. 

Sincai\~JL'tf JJ:<_c_,~;t_Q 

Ashley GifiSone, Director of Sc.;/es . 

f-ly edt fJh1ce Sarasota!Bmdenton Airport 

Cc:" The Honor.al:";ie Hay H. L&l-kJ•::;d:l ,. 

Secretary, of Tran!-'.t->Oftation• .·, . . 

j', ; 

United States· Department of Transportation 

·1200 New .Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Wast1ing',on, DC 2059C 

Hyatt Place Sarasota/Bradenton Airport ·
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          18,106
<SECURITIES>                                    47,148
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,189
<PP&E>                                          25,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,136
<SALES>                                          3,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,935
<CGS>                                            2,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,719)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
        

</TABLE>
No. 59918.

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

protests 235674-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Angora rabbit hair similar in all material respects to that the subject of *W. N. Proctor Company*v. *United States*(35 cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63491.

protest 59/409 (New York).

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

*395Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance witb rule 6(b) of tbe rules of tbis court, as amended, tbe protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert K. Weiler, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Phase Forward
Incorporated;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition
instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986.](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 13, 2004 By: /s/ Robert K. WeilerRobert K. WeilerChief Executive Officer