alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 67707.

#### Grayblock Ribbon & Co. and Wood Niebuhr & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/5265, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of nylon ribbons similar in use to pile ribbons, wholly or in chief value of silk, the claim at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1206, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or at 23%, 22%, or 21 percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of nylon ribbons similar in use to silk fabrics with fast edges, not over 12 inches wide, were held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 1207, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), or at 21, 20, or 19 percent, depending upon the date of entry, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), as claimed. *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended April 30, 2008, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/ THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 61
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION

I, Kelly Tucek, Assistant Vice President, certify that:

-  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.;Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:- designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
- all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation    General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and         Principal Financial Officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.

Date: August 11, 2003
No. 57879.

protests 211864-K and 213914-K (New York).

#### General Motors Overseas Operations and Baker Irons & Dockstader, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of 2-watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
        connection with the Annual Report of Fuego Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugo M. Cancio,
        in
        my capacity as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of
        2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




**Fuego
                  Entertainment, Inc.**Date:
                  July 31, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  Hugo M. CancioHugo
                  M. Cancio
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Philip M. Pead, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Per-Se Technologies, Inc., Inc. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:
(i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                      By: /s/ PHILIP M. PEAD
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Philip M. Pead
                                         Chairman, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Date: May 9, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Per-Se Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
All final decisions from FERC can be appealed to federal courts.

STAY

INVOLVED www.ferc.gov customer@ferc.gov 1 (866) 208-3676 @FERC fb.com/ferc.gov 

1 Companies wanting to build a new or modify an existing interstate natural gas pipeline 

must submit an application to FERC.

2

FERC issues its analysis for further public comment. 3

4

All parties to an application can ask FERC for rehearing, or a new decision, if they are 

unsatisfied. 5

FERC considers this request before making a final decision. 6

7

FERC does not regulate the 

production or delivery of natural 

gas directly to consumers.

States regulate these areas.

To ensure safe construction and operation, all 

pipelines must comply with the requirements set 

forth by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials 

Safety Administration (PHMSA).

FERC’s scientific, legal, and economic experts evaluate the environmental, cultural, 

geological, land use, and socioeconomic aspects of the project. As part of this review, 

FERC seeks written comments from the public and holds public scoping meetings.

After consideration of the environmental analysis; engineering, economic, legal, and 

policy reviews; and all public comments; FERC decides whether to approve or deny an 

application and, if approved, what conditions to apply to it.

NATURAL GAS

AT FERC
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THECHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C §1350

 

I, Kathleen Mason, the Chief Executive Officer ofTuesday Morning Corporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.             The quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofTuesday Morning Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2009 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in theabove-mentioned report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Tuesday Morning Corporation.

 
| Date: October 30, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Kathleen Mason                       |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Kathleen Mason   Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4658

_____________________________

TONY MOBLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

James Daniel, Judge.

August 2, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Tony Mobley, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 59916.

#### The Oval Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 199728-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chalk-white stones, faceted, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Anthracite Capital, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Christopher A. Milner, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James J.
Lillis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Christopher A. Milner
|Name:                     |  | Christopher A. Milner  
|Title:                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                     |  | August 10, 2009        
|                         
|/s/ James J. Lillis      
|Name:                     |  | James J. Lillis        
|Title:                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                     |  | August 10, 2009
No. 51546.

#### Protests 127257-K, etc., of Phil Kronfeld, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4611-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4611-DR), dated August 29, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on August 19, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Benjamin Abbott, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Sandra L. Eslinger as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-23227 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
No. 68567.

protest 59/23816 (Savannah).

#### Joseph Craig & Co., CHB, and E. R. B. Haldan, Sports Internanational *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of golf caddy carts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64052, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00291

- CR Zoila FREIRE , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR2613 Honorable Frank J. Castro , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 29, 2019
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellant Zoila Freire pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, penalty group 1, less than one gram. On September 28, 2018, Appellant’s adjudication of guilt was deferred, and Appellant was placed on community supervision. On April 3, 2019, the trial court amended Appellant’s community supervision conditions. Appellant now seeks to appeal from the trial court’s April 3, 2019 order, which Appellant signed on March 29, 2019, modifying the conditions of Appellant’s deferred adjudication.04

- 19

- 00291

- CR

- 2

- On May 9, 2019, we advised Appellant that “ a n order modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication is not i n itself appealable .” See Davis v. State , 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ; Basaldua v. State , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by May 24, 2019, why this appeal should not be dismissed for

wa nt of jurisdiction. See Davis , 195 S.W.3d at 711. Appellant ’s court

- appointed appellate counsel timely filed a response. Counsel advised the court that “Appellant is requesting that the trial court amend the conditions of probation ” based

on Appellant’s claims that the conditions violate her constitutional rights, and counsel asks this court not to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s response does not cure the jurisdictional defect: “ a n order modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication is not i n itself appealable .” See Davis , 195 S.W.3d at 711 ; Basaldua , 558 S.W.2d at 5. Appellant’s response fails to show how this court has jurisdiction in this appeal. W e dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Davis , 195 S.W.3d at 711.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30144 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JAMES ASHFORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CR-189-N)

December 18, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant James Ashford (“Ashford”) pleaded guilty to

conspiracy to commit armed robbery of a mail carrier and to armed

robbery of a mail carrier. In the plea agreement, Ashford waived

his right to appeal his sentence or to seek post-conviction relief

challenging his sentence unless the punishment imposed was inexcess of the statutory maximum or it was a departure above the

guideline range. Ashford was sentenced to concurrent terms of

imprisonment of 90 months on each count to be followed by a fiveyear term of supervised release.

Ashford argues that the 90-month sent ence imposed for the

conspiracy offense exceeded t he statutory maximum term of

imprisonment of 60 months and the sentence should be vacated and

the conspiracy count remanded for resentencing. The government

concedes tha t the sentence imposed for the conspiracy count

exceeded the five-year maximum statutory pe nalty and should be

vacated and remanded for resentencing.

We agre e. A district court may not impose a sentence that

exceeds the maximum sentence specified in the statute under which

a defendant is convicted. U nited States v. Carrion-Caliz

, 944 F.2d

220, 227 (5th Cir. 1 991), cert. denied , 503 U.S. 965 (1992); s ee

U .S.S.G. § 5G1.1(a)(if the guideline range exceeds the statutory

maximum, the latter shall be the guideline sentence). The maximum

statutory penalty for conspiracy to commit armed robbery under 18

U.S.C. § 371 is a fine or imprisonment of “not more than five

years, or both.” The 90-month sentence imposed by the district

court for the consp iracy offense exceeded the statutory maximum,

and, thus, under the terms of the plea agreement, Ashford did not

waive his right to appeal that portion of his sentence.

Although Ashford’s concurrent 90-month sentence for the armed

robbery offense appears to be valid, see 18 U.S.C. § 2114(a),Ashford’s sentence for the conspiracy count must be vacated and the

case remanded for resentencing. S ee United States v. Lewis

, 92

F.3d 1371, 1379 (5th Cir. 1996).

VACATE sentence in part; REMAND for resentencing.
No. 53380.

protest 124720-K (Bridgeport).

#### International Traders *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66202.

#### M. Pressner *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/14277 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fishing poles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59620, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 127

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking
2

•HJ 127 EH

1 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘Decem2 ber 8, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 7,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 127

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.
No. 50814.

#### Protests 54301-K, etc., of Porter (Phila.), Inc. (New York).

*207Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 57880.

protests 214091-K, etc. (New York).

#### Distilled Brands, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, or not landed, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, or not landed, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.