alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.2
                    COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended           Six Months Ended
                                                            March 31                   March 31          
                                                     ---------------------       ---------------------
                                                      1999          1998          1999          1998   
                                                     -------       -------       -------       -------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Shares

Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding ........................        16,820        16,086        16,668        16,039
Additional shares assuming
   conversion of stock options and warrants(1)           359           580           357           552
                                                     -------       -------       -------       -------

Weighted average shares outstanding ..........        17,179        16,666        17,025        16,591
                                                     =======       =======       =======       =======

Net income ...................................       $ 6,504       $ 4,036       $11,427       $ 7,691
                                                     =======       =======       =======       =======

Diluted earnings per share ...................       $  0.38       $  0.24       $  0.67       $  0.46
                                                     =======       =======       =======       =======
</TABLE>

(1)      The Company's Convertible Subordinated Notes were anti-dilutive for the
         periods presented.


                                       16
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                       The Schedule Contains Summary Financial
                                       Information Extracted From Balance Sheets
                                       and Statements of Income
                                            
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS                    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1997              
<PERIOD-START>                    Jan-1-1997               
<PERIOD-END>                      Mar-31-1997              
<CASH>                                        0         
<SECURITIES>                                  0         
<RECEIVABLES>                         4,798,678            
<ALLOWANCES>                           (307,730)          
<INVENTORY>                           4,509,274            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      9,459,698            
<PP&E>                                  785,792           
<DEPRECIATION>                         (642,318)          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        9,590,796            
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 3,887,469            
<BONDS>                                       0         
<COMMON>                             17,558,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0         
<PREFERRED>                                   0            
<OTHER-SE>                          (11,855,446)           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          9,590,796            
<SALES>                               5,096,289            
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      5,096,289            
<CGS>                                   907,686           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           907,686           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         91,770          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (2,543)         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         200,465           
<INCOME-TAX>                             10,783          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     189,682           
<DISCONTINUED>                                0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0         
<CHANGES>                                     0         
<NET-INCOME>                            189,682           
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.02         
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.02         
                                  


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of Global Services Partners Acquisition Corp.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2006 (the
‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Rahul Prakash, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
      of
      the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      October 30, 2006






By:  /s/
      Rahul
      Prakash 
 Rahul
        Prakash Chairman
        of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
        Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofAtlantic Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), each certify that, to his orher knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

1.               The annual report of the Company for theperiod ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:    March 30,  2009 | By:                      | /s/  Robert P. Trask     |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                              | Robert  P. Trask         |
|                                              | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                              |                     |                     |
| Date:    March 30,  2009 | By:                      | /s/  Michelle M. Pennell |
|                                              | Michelle  M. Pennell     |
|                                              | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
February 15, 1954

No. 57873.

protest 209545-K.

#### Friedman Mirror & Glass Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Abstract 57752. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GARY L. SELLERS
, Appellant,

v.

THE BEAR'S CLUB PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., JOHN BITOVE, WILLIAM TERLATA, SHERRIE ABBRUZZESE, GARY NICKLAUS, ROBERT WESSELMAN, and THE BEARS CLUB FOUNDING PARTNER, LLC, f/k/a THE BEAR'S CLUB FOUNDING PARTNERS,

LTD.
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 22

- 2160

[ May 4, 2023 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; James Nutt , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502022CA000474

.

Jeremy Dicker of Sachs Sax Caplan, Boca Raton, for Appellant.

Mark M. Heinish o f Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees The Bear's Club Property Owners' Association Inc., John Bitove, William Terlato, Sherrie Abbruzzese, Gary Nicklaus and Robert

Wesselman.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered May 28, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01146-CR

JOSEPH WAYNE HUNTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-56295-R

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On May 19, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief had not been filed. On May 27, 2015, we received appellant’s brief, together with an 

extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the May 19, 

2015 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the May 27, 2015 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as 

of the date of this order.

We ORDER Mary Snider, former official court reporter of the 265th Judicial District 

Court, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record 

containing State’s Exhibit no. 14.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Mary Snider, official court reporter 

283rd Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical Services Corporation, as general
partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

/s/ WILLIAM A. SANGERWilliam A. Sanger Chief Executive Officer
Emergency Medical Services Corporation, as
    general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P.February 19, 2010/s/ RANDEL G. OWENRandel G. Owen Chief Financial Officer
Emergency Medical Services Corporation, as
    general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P.February 19, 2010


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 96 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 96

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
regarding the right of citizens of the United States to health care of 
                          equal high quality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2000

  Mr. Jackson of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
regarding the right of citizens of the United States to health care of 
                          equal high quality.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. All citizens of the United States shall enjoy the 
right to health care of equal high quality.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to implement this 
article by appropriate legislation.''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned,Christopher Menard, Chief Financial Officer of Phase Forward Incorporated (the “Company”),in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to therequirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

 

·                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

·                   theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This certification isbeing provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of theReport, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ CHRISTOPHER MENARD                                                                    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Christopher Menard  Chief Financial Officer  Phase Forward Incorporated  May 8, 2009 |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7325
COURTNEY D. HAMMOND, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PAUL LANTEIGNE, Sheriff, VA Beach Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00266-RLW) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 4, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Courtney D. Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Courtney D. Hammond seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his action for failure to comply with a court order. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 30, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on July 18, 2006. * Because Hammond failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions3 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2022164EN.01000601.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2022/943

of 17 June 2022

correcting certain language versions of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 on the Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) (1), and in particular Article 2 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Croatian and Estonian language versions of Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 contain an error in Annex I, in the table ‘Main Vocabulary’, second column as regards the Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) code 79530000-8. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Croatian and Estonian language versions of Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 contain an error in Annex I, in the table ‘Main Vocabulary’, second column as regards the Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) code 79530000-8.

| (2) | The Croatian and Estonian language versions of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Croatian and Estonian language versions of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2022.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 340, 16.12.2002, p. 1.

1

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. DAVID JIM ENEZ-PEDR OZA, a .k.a . Osc a r M anue l Gue rre ro, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-50483

D.C . No. 2:10-c r-00370-DM G M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Dolly M . Ge e , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT, a nd THOM AS, C irc uit Judge s. David Jim e ne z -Pe droz a

a ppe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s his guilty-ple a c onvic tion a

nd 235-m onth se nt e nc e for c onspira c y to posse s s with intent to distribute m e tha m phe tam ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED D EC 06 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A); and 846. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jim e ne z -Pe droz a ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c o unse l of re c ord. Jim e ne z Pe droz a ha s file d

a pro se supple m e nta l brie f and the gove rnm e nt ha s file d a m otion to dism

iss thea ppe a l. Jim e ne z -Pe droz a

wa ive d the right to a

ppe a l his c onvic tion, with the e xc e ption of a

n a ppe a l ba se d on a

c la im tha t his ple a wa s involunta

ry . He a lso wa ive d the right to a

ppe a l m ost a spe c ts of his sente nc e , a s long a s his se nte nc e did not e xc e e d 25 y e ars. Our indepe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f a s to the volunta rine ss of Jim e ne z -Pe droz a ’ s ple a or a ny a s pe c ts of these nte nc e not c ove re d by the a ppe a l wa ive r. W e the re fore a ffirm a s to thoseissue s. W e grant the gove rnm e nt’ s m o tion in pa rt a nd dismi ss there m a inde r of the a ppe a l in light of the va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th C ir. 2009). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 2 - 5 0 4 8 3 2
No. 57563.

#### A. L. Bazzini Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 204035-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
IIA

Calendar No. 785

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 72

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2000

Received

JULY 27, 2000

Read the first time

SEPTEMBER 5, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

JOINT RESOLUTION

Granting the consent of the Congress to the Red River

Boundary Compact.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HJ 72 PCS

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL CONSENT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The consent of Congress is given

3 to the Red River Compact entered into between the States

4 of Texas and Oklahoma and the new boundary established

5 by the compact.

6 (b) NEW COMPACT.—The compact referred to in sub7 section (a) sets the boundary between the States of Texas

8 and Oklahoma as the vegetation line on the south bank

9 of the Red River (except for the Texoma area where the

10 boundary is established pursuant to procedures provided

11 for in the compact) and is the compact—

12 (1) agreed to by the State of Texas in House

13 Bill 1355 approved by the Governor of Texas on

14 May 24, 1999; and

15 (2) agreed to by the State of Oklahoma in Sen16 ate Bill 175 approved by the Governor of Oklahoma

17 on June 4, 1999.

18 (c) COMPACT.—The Acts referred to in subsection (b)

19 are recognized by Congress as an interstate compact pur20 suant to section 10 of Article I of the United States Con21 stitution.

22 (d) CONSTRUCTION.—The compact shall not in any

23 manner alter—

24 (1) any present or future rights and interests of

25 the Kiowa, Comanche, and Apache Tribes, the

26 Chickasaw Nation, and the Choctaw Nation of Okla-
3

HJ 72 PCS

1 homa and their members or Indian successors-in in2 terest;

3 (2) any tribal trust lands;

4 (3) allotted lands that may be held in trust or

5 lands subject to a Federal restriction against alien6 ation;

7 (4) any boundaries of lands owned by the tribes

8 and nations referred to in paragraph (1), including

9 lands referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3), that

10 exist now or that may be established in the future

11 under Federal law; and

12 (5) the sovereign rights, jurisdiction, or other

13 governmental interests of the Kiowa, Comanche, and

14 Apache Tribes, the Chickasaw Nation, and the Choc15 taw Nation of Oklahoma and their members or In16 dian successors-in interest presently existing or

17 which may be acknowledged by Federal and tribal

18 law.
4

HJ 72 PCS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This joint resolution shall take effect on August 31,

3 2000.

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 785

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 72

JOINT RESOLUTION

Granting the consent of the Congress to the Red

River Boundary Compact.

SEPTEMBER 5, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar