alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                              PAGING NETWORK, INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                        June 30,                June 30,
                                                  --------------------    --------------------
                                                    1997        1996        1997        1996
                                                  --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                               <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>      
Earnings:
  Loss before extraordinary item ..............   $(34,919)   $(18,532)   $(74,833)   $(30,638)
  Fixed charges ...............................     44,031      34,785      87,244      69,248
                                                  --------    --------    --------    --------
     Earnings .................................   $  9,112    $ 16,253    $ 12,411    $ 38,610
                                                  ========    ========    ========    ========


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense ............................   $ 36,422    $ 28,623    $ 71,530    $ 57,075
  Amortization of deferred financing costs ....      1,859       1,284       4,330       2,567
  Interest portion of rental expense ..........      5,750       4,878      11,384       9,606
                                                  --------    --------    --------    --------
     Fixed charges ............................   $ 44,031    $ 34,785    $ 87,244    $ 69,248
                                                  ========    ========    ========    ========


  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ..........          -           -           -           -
                                                  ========    ========    ========    ========

  Deficiency of earnings available to cover
    fixed charges .............................   $(34,919)   $(18,532)   $(74,833)   $(30,638)
                                                  ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
Amendment to Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
    Years of Service
    
    % of Final Average Pay1
    
    
    4
    %2
    
    
    8
    %3
    
    
    12
    %4
    
    
    16
    %5
    
    
    20
    %6
    
    
    24
    %7
    
    
    28
    %8
    
    
    32
    %9
    
    
    36
    %10 or more
    
    
    40
    %
   Date: September 8, 2008Stewart Enterprises, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Thomas M. KitchenThomas M. Kitchen,Senior Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
No. 63980.

protest 59/26054 (New York).

#### Venetianaire Corp. of America *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D.N. *& E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10.4

Change of Control Agreement between Premier Bancorp, Inc., Premier Bank and
Bruce E. Sickel (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 13, 1998).

                                       36

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,051
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,520
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,040
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    142,731
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          69,735
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            68,911
<LOANS>                                        139,466
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,628
<DEPOSITS>                                     347,860
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,822
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 384,628
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,389
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,202
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,228
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,713
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,724
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,867
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 187
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,398
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,398
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,011
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        32
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    99
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,701
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      254
<RECOVERIES>                                       169
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,916
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,916
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 62

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 22, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change

between Georgia and South Carolina.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HJ 62 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CONSENT OF CONGRESS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The consent of Congress is given

3 to the establishment of the boundary between the States

4 of Georgia and South Carolina.

5 (b) NEW BOUNDARY.—The boundary referred to in

6 subsection (a) is the boundary—

7 (1) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act

8 Number 1044 (S.B. No. 572) approved by the Gov9 ernor on April 5, 1994, and agreed to by the State

10 of South Carolina in Act Number 375 (S.B. No.

11 1315) approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996;

12 (2) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act

13 Number 1044 (S.B. No. 572) approved by the Gov14 ernor on April 5, 1994, and agreed to by the State

15 of South Carolina in an Act approved by its Gov16 ernor not later than 5 years after the date of the en17 actment of this joint resolution;

18 (3) agreed to by the State of South Carolina in

19 Act Number 375 (S.B. No. 1315) approved by the

20 Governor on May 29, 1996, and agreed to by the

21 State of Georgia in an Act approved by its Governor

22 not later than 5 years after the date of the enact23 ment of this joint resolution; or

24 (4) agreed to by the States of Georgia and

25 South Carolina in Acts approved by each of their
3

HJ 62 RFS

1 Governors not later than 5 years after the date of

2 the enactment of this joint resolution.

3 (c) COMPACT.—The Acts referred to in subsection (b)

4 are recognized by Congress as an interstate compact pur5 suant to section 10 of article I of the United States Con6 stitution.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

July 9, 2003

Mr. Doak Slay
1006 Wildwood Crossing
Georgetown, TX 78628

Re: Equity Advancement

Dear Doak:

By copy of this letter and upon valid signature by all parties, Central Freight
Lines, Inc. hereby conveys a check in the amount of $120,000.00. This amount
should be considered as an advance to you of the equity of your home located at
155 Northwind Trail, Fayetteville, GA 30214.

By you and your wife signing below, you hereby agree to waive any rights that
you may have in the equity of your home up to the amount of $120,000. Central
Freight Lines, Inc. will reimburse you for all reasonable closing costs
associated with the sale of your home in Fayetteville. At the time of closing,
the total reimbursable closing costs will be applied the to the $120,000 Equity
Advance. At that time, the net proceeds from the sale of the home will be
applied to the net balance of the Equity Advance. Any amounts exceeding the
$120,000 amount will be rightfully yours. Should the closing take place and any
shortfall occur, the shortfall will be considered as an expense to Central and
income to you for which you will receive a 1099 from Central. At that time, you
will have no further obligation to Central concerning this agreement.

In order for this agreement to become effective, both you and Denise will need
to sign below in the presence of a witness.

Should there be any dispute or legal action concerning this agreement, any and
all actions or suits will be filed in State District Court in Waco, McLennan
County, Texas and Texas law will apply.

Agreed:

/s/ Pat Curry                 Date:  _________
Patrick J. Curry
Executive Vice President

/s/ Doak Slay                 Date:  _________     ____________   Date:  _______
Doak D. Slay                                       Witness Name:  ______________

/s/ Denise Slay               Date:  _________     ____________   Date: ________
Denise D. Slay                                     Witness Name:  ______________
Exhibit 10.13

Essential Innovations Technology Corp.



Jason McDiarmid


Position -        President, CEO & Director

                  Essential Innovations Technology Corp. & Essential Innovations
                  Asia Limited

Term -            August 1, 2003 to July 31, 2005; automatic 1 year renewal at
                  July 31, 2004 (extending contract to July 31, 2006) and every
                  year thereafter unless Company advises that contract will not
                  be renewed; at time of automatic 1 year renewal July 31, 2004,
                  if appropriate funding is available, the salary may be
                  re-negotiated for the third year extension,

Basic Salary:     First year                US $165,000
                  Second year               US $181,500

Salary to accrue until such time as the Company has the cash reserves to begin
to make payment in a timely manner each month; additionally, the option will be
given to the executive to convert a portion or all of the accrued wages to
shares of stock at his/her desire at a pre-determined conversion price.

                  Bonus plan to be agreed upon

Options -         additional 250,000 to be issued upon entering into new
                  agreement

         - Participation in any further option plan instigated by EITC

Benefits:

         -        vehicle + operating costs
         -        group health / dental (for self and family in future if
                  applicable)
         -        assistance with relocation costs (if necessary)
         -        pay for immigration or visa requirements (if necessary)
         -        any other benefits that the Company may implement for similar
                  position
         -        reimbursement of business expenses
         -        pay for professional association dues
         -        pay for required continuing professional education
         -        paid vacation of 4 weeks per year
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                              MEDAPHIS CORPORATION
            COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY  AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
            THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND 1996
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED                 NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,                      SEPTEMBER 30,
       DESCRIPTION                                            1997           1996                1997          1996
-----------------------------                              ---------      ---------           ---------      ---------
                                                           (As Restated, See Note 6)          (As Restated, See Note 6)
<S>                                                        <C>            <C>                 <C>            <C>
PRIMARY AND FULLY
Weighted average shares outstanding
  during the period                                           72,942         71,665              72,542         71,123

Shares issuable upon assumed exercise 
  of stock options, less amounts assumed 
  repurchased under the treasury stock 
  method                                                           -              -                   -              -
                                                           ---------      ---------           ---------      --------- 
Total weighted average common stock
  and common stock equivalent outstanding
  during the period                                           72,942         71,665              72,542         71,123
                                                           =========      =========           =========      =========

Pro forma net income (loss) before extraordinary item      $ (81,209)     $ (34,384)          $ (85,533)     $ (33,891)
Extraordinary income on sale of HRI                                -              -              76,391              -
                                                           ---------      ---------           ---------      ---------              
Pro forma net income (loss)                                $ (81,209)     $ (34,384)          $  (9,142)     $ (33,891)
                                                           =========      =========           =========      =========

Pro forma net income (loss) per common share:
Pro forma net income (loss) before extraordinary item      $   (1.11)     $   (0.47)          $   (1.18)     $   (0.48)
Extraordinary income on sale of HRI                                -              -                1.05              -
                                                           ---------      ---------           ---------      ---------
Pro forma net income (loss)                                $   (1.11)     $   (0.47)          $   (0.13)     $   (0.48) 
                                                           =========      =========           =========      =========
</TABLE>
January 4, 1950

No. 53875.

Suit 4618.

#### Will & Baumer Candle Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1146 reversed November 7, 1949. C. A. D. 414.
No. 68594.

protest 62/11103 (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co. Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embrex, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don T. Seaquist, Vice President, Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 5, 2003



/s/    DON T.
SEAQUISTDon T. Seaquist Vice President, Finance and Administration
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 10, 2015 

# Order

March 10, 2015

150997 ( 22 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

LINDA KAY STERMER

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 150997

COA: 323443

Van Buren CC: 09

- 016654

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to hold the

application for leave to appeal in abeyance until April 6, 2015, to allow new counsel to

file a supplemental or substitute application is GRANTED. The time period for plaintiff

appellee to file its answer begins running on the date it is served with defendant

appellant’s supplemental/substitute application or April 6, 2015, whichever is earl ier.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1620

In re: PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:18

- hc

- 02078

- FL)

Submitted : July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Paul Bernard Coleman, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Paul Bernard Coleman petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition . He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record doe s not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo re this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Exhibit  32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick G. LePore, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  This certification accompanies the Report and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.    /s/ Patrick G. LePore Patrick G. LePore Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer May 4, 2010
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 110

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275 is amended by striking ‘‘Octo4 ber 6, 2000’’ in section 106(c) and inserting in lieu thereof

5 ‘‘October 14, 2000’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0629

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JOSHUA AARON BROWN,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Ashley Harada, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 20 2022

07/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0629
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

261) ll-K-(I)-74 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:57 AM Sheet 261 of 325 
P.2 

'A\ Pl 

II-K-(I)-74 

COST OF CAPITAL FOR FIRMS AND UTILITIES AFFECTED 

BY THE FUEL USE ACT (FUA) 

Letter from Ernst & Ernst, Inc. to S. Stern, D0E:DCR 

May 7, 1979 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-74
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 10.35.1


SCHEDULE OF PARTIES TO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT WITH ROCKFORD CORPORATION:



W. Gary Suttle
Jerry E. Goldress
Nicholas G. Bartol
Timothy C. Bartol
Ralph B. Godfrey
John P. Lloyd
No. 60657.

#### Edwin Jay, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 276198-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.