alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001012704
<NAME> UGLY DUCKLING CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          41,149
<SECURITIES>                                     5,208
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,842
<INVENTORY>                                     15,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          33,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,317
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,475
<SALES>                                         46,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,443
<CGS>                                           25,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,668
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<FN>
<F1>UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

| 1.   | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March 26, 2007 |                   /s/              Ban-Jun              Yang                |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Ban-Jun                Yang, President, CEO and Director                (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                            |

----
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bradley W. Evans,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: August 12, 2008                            /s/ Bradley W. Evans
                                                 Bradley W. Evans
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Principal Executive Officer
# L_2022241EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/1609

of 12 September 2022

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Marmelada Branca de Odivelas’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Marmelada Branca de Odivelas’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Marmelada Branca de Odivelas’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Marmelada Branca de Odivelas’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Marmelada Branca de Odivelas’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Marmelada Branca de Odivelas’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 219, 3.6.2022, p. 20.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 327

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the service and sacrifice during periods of war

by members of the United States merchant marine.

Whereas throughout the history of the United States, the

United States merchant marine has served the Nation

during periods of war;

Whereas vessels of the United States merchant marine fleet,

such as the S.S. LANE VICTORY, provided critical

logistical support to the Armed Forces by carrying equipment, supplies, and personnel necessary to maintain war

efforts;

Whereas numerous members of the United States merchant

marine have died to secure peace and freedom; and

Whereas at a time when the people of the United States are

recognizing the contributions of the Armed Forces and

civilian personnel to the national security, it is appropriate to recognize the service of the United States merchant marine: Now, therefore, be it
2

HCON 327 RFS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) honors the service and sacrifice during peri4 ods of war by members of the United States mer5 chant marine;

6 (2) recognizes the critical role played by vessels

7 of the United States merchant marine fleet, such as

8 the S.S. LANE VICTORY, in transporting equip9 ment, supplies, and personnel necessary to support

10 war efforts; and

11 (3) encourages—

12 (A) the American people, through appro13 priate ceremonies and activities, to recognize

14 and commemorate the service and sacrifices of

15 the United States merchant marine; and

16 (B) all government agencies to take appro17 priate steps to commemorate the United States

18 merchant marine.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1189

MICHAEL T. MASUOKA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus G. W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED; 1-5 JOHN DOES, Entities; JANE DOES, 1-5 Entities; DOES CORPORATION, 1-5 entities; DOES PARTNERSHIP, 1-5 Entities; JOHN DOES, 1-5 Governmental Entities; JANE DOES, 1- 5 Governmental Entities, Defendants - Appellees, versus ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.; KENNETH T. GOYA, Insurance Agent, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-829-AM) Submitted: April 11, 2002 Decided: July 8, 2002 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael T. Masuoka, Appellant Pro Se. Mark David Crawford, FRIEDLANDER, MISLER, FRIEDLANDER, SLOAN & HERZ, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for independent action to vacate and set aside the judgments filed on February 14th and 21st.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co. , No. CA-00-829-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL ALLEN BLUNT,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES A. YATES, Warden;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF CALIFORNIA,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 09-15628

D.C. No. 1:06-cv-00463-IEG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Daniel Allen Blunt appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 07 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-15628

Blunt contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s

verdicts convicting him of burglary and murder. The California court’s conclusion

that there was sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable trier of fact to find Blunt

guilty beyond a reasonable doubt was not contrary to, or an unreasonable

application of, clearly established Supreme Court law, and was not an

unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(d); see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). 

Blunt also contends that he received ineffective assistance because his

counsel failed to object to the admission of a witness’ pretrial statement on the

basis that it was involuntarily coerced. The California court’s conclusion that

Blunt did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel because such a challenge to

the witness’ statement would have been fruitless was not contrary to, or an

unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law, and was not

an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(d); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88 (1984).

Blunt further contends that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by

introducing false evidence. However, it was not misconduct for the prosecutor to

introduce the witness’ prior inconsistent statement because it was unclear which of

the witness’ versions of the events was true and therefore the prosecutor did not
3 09-15628

knowingly use false evidence. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 678

(1985).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Blunt’s request for

an evidentiary hearing. See Perez v. Rosario, 459 F.3d 943, 953 (9th Cir. 2006). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, C. Boyd Clarke, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Neose Technologies, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                    |  |  |  | /s/    C. BOYD CLARKE                               
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|August 7,
2003 Date |  |  |  | C. Boyd Clarke President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of NCI, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /s/    CHARLES K.
NARANG                                                                         
|                     |  | Charles K. Narang Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI,
Inc. and will be retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2 

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551 

DIVISION OF SUPERVISION 

AND REGULATION

DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND 

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

SR 22-3 

CA 22-1 

January 21, 2022 

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION AND APPROPRIATE 

SUPERVISORY AND EXAMINATION STAFF AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE 

BANK AND INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE

SUBJECT: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Issues Statement of 

Principles on Examination Information Requests

Applicability: This letter applies to all institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, including 

those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets. 

On January 21, 2022, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) 

issued a statement (statement) outlining the principles for examination information requests that 

the members of the FFIEC developed and committed to implement based on results of the final 

phase of the Examination Modernization Project (Project).1 The Project was initiated in 

response to a review of regulations under the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The statement also discusses the development of a common authentication 

mechanism for external access to FFIEC members’ respective supervision systems. 

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter to the supervised organizations in their 

districts and to appropriate supervisory staff. Questions may be sent via the Board’s public 

website.2

1 The FFIEC Statement of Principles on Examination Information Requests supplements the guidance in SR letter 

19-5, “Communication Expectations for Community Bank Examinations and Inspections.”

2 See https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx. 
Page 2 of 2 

Michael S. Gibson Eric S. Belsky

Director Director

Division of Supervision Division of Consumer and

and Regulation Community Affairs

Attachments:

• FFIEC Statement of Principles on Examination Information Requests

Cross References:

• SR letter 19-5, “Communication Expectations for Community Bank Examinations and 

Inspections”
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade

relations treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 1999

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of

the People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 3, 1999, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 95

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   relative to taxing the people of the United States progressively.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2000

  Mr. Jackson of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   relative to taxing the people of the United States progressively.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Congress of the United States shall tax all 
persons progressively in proportion to the income which they 
respectively enjoy under the protection of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.

                                 <all>
```