alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 246

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding elimination of the portion

of the national debt held by the public by 2015 or earlier.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 2000

Mr. KUYKENDALL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding elimination

of the portion of the national debt held by the public

by 2015 or earlier.

Whereas by the end of fiscal year 1999, the national debt had

reached $5.66 trillion;

Whereas almost $3.6 trillion of the national debt is held by

the public;

Whereas the large amount of such publicly held debt and the

interest that must be paid on such debt impairs the Federal Government’s handling of economic or military crises

and diverts critical resources away from Federal programs;

Whereas financial pressure on the social security and medicare trust funds will increase as a growing number of
2

•HCON 246 IH

Americans reach retirement age, thus increasing the need

to reallocate Federal resources to support programs that

depend on such trust funds and other Federal programs;

Whereas the resources currently dedicated to paying the interest on such publicly held debt could be reallocated to

support the Nation’s retiring population, but such reallocation would require a committed effort to reducing

such debt;

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office projects growing

budget surpluses for the next ten years and such surpluses could be used to reduce such publicly held debt;

Whereas based on the anticipated surpluses, the Congressional Budget Office projects that such publicly held debt

could be reduced to $865 billion by 2009; and

Whereas by continuing to follow a policy of fiscal restraint

and controlled spending, it would be possible to eliminate

such publicly held debt by 2015 or earlier: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Congress and the President should work together to elimi4 nate the portion of the national debt held by the public

5 by 2015 or earlier.

Æ
No. 66663.

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Shield’s, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/17775 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vacuum brush cleaners similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10621)

#### Hurricane Import Co. (Perryman, Mojonier) et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 36806, etc.

(Decided November 13, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*John W.*Douglas, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof cover merchandise entered or withdrawn from Customs warehouse for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and was therefore appraised under Section 402(b) of the Simplification Act of 1936, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session; said merchandise not being identified in the Pinal List published in T.D. 54521.

> 2. That as to the merchandise shipped by the following from Japan:

> Hasegawa Shoten

> Inoue Seiren

> Yamagutíhi-ken Sudare Kumiai

> at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the entered unit values, net packed, or plus packing where packing is listed separately on the invoices as not being included in the entered unit values.

> 4. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A”, are submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise shipped by Hasegawa Shoten, Inoue Seiren, and Yamaguchi-ken Sudare Kumiai and that such values were the entered unit values, net, packed, or plus packing where packing is listed separately on the invoices as not being included in the entered unit values, -

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofGlobal Imaging Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

|   | (a)    |   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | (b)    |   | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           |

|                   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|-------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| November 12, 2002 |   |   | /s/ THOMAS S. JOHNSONDate  **Thomas S. Johnson,****President and Chief Executive Officer**   November 12, 2002  /s/ RAYMOND SCHILLINGDate  **Raymond Schilling,****Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer**  |
EXHIBIT 10.5



 EXHIBIT 10.5 
  

	 ASHE FEDERAL BANK
 EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
	 	 	 	AMENDMENT NO. 1
	 	 	 	 DOCUMENT:
 DRAFT DATE:
	 	 (TPW) NY02/1206618.1
 11/11/97

				
	(Effective July 1, 1996)	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	BOARD OF DIRECTORS	 	 
	AMENDMENT	 	 	 	APPROVAL DATE:	 	_______

  
 1. Article II – Effective
as of July 1, 1996, the last sentence of section 2.4(b) of the Plan shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 If a non-vested Employee returns to the service of the Employer or any Affiliated Employer following a Period of Severance of greater than five
consecutive years, then such Employee shall forfeit any Period of Service prior to such separation. 
  
 2. Article VIII – Effective as of July 1, 1996, section 8.2(d) of the Plan shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 (d) When a Participant’s Annual Addition to this Plan must be reduced to satisfy the limitations of
section 8.2(a) or (b), such reduction shall be effected (i) by reducing the amount of future ESOP Contributions and Loan Repayment Contributions, in that order of priority, to be made to the Plan and attributable to the Participant for the
Limitation Year, to the extent that such reduction may be made without violating the terms of the Plan; and (ii) to the extent that actions taken under section 8.2(d)(i) do not produce compliance with the limitations, by reducing the
Participant’s Annual Additions to this Plan attributable to ESOP Contributions and Loan Repayment Contributions, in that order of priority, and reallocating such amounts to other Participants in the current Limitation Year; and (iii) if an
excess Annual Addition occurs due to a reasonable error in estimating compensation pursuant to section 8.2(e), the allocation of Forfeitures, or other circumstances permitted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and the excess Annual Addition is
not eliminated in the current Limitation Year, then amount of the Participant’s excess Annual Addition to this Plan shall be allocated in accordance with Articles V and VII as a contribution by the Employer in the next succeeding Limitation
Year. 
  
 3. Article IX – section 9.1 shall be amended to change the
cross-reference from section 9.6(a) to section 18.2. 
  

 Page 1 of 1
1

Resolve sound issues in Skype for Business when connected to a 

second monitor

Some users have experienced issues with sound when attempting to use 

Skype for Business remotely. If you are working remotely and you are 

connected to an external monitor your laptop’s audio controls may default to 

the monitor’s audio rather than from your laptop.

1. Click your speaker icon located on the lower right corner of your 

laptop screen. 

2. Click the arrow key to view the audio inputs from your computer. 

3. Select the dropdown arrow titled “Select playback device” and select 

“Speakers/Headphones (Realtek(R) Audio)”

4. You should now have audio capabilities defaulted back to your laptop 

rather than your external monitor. 

Note: This will resolve audio capabilities to your laptop, but an additional 

set of steps is needed to fix the issue on the Skype for Business app.
2

Checking the Audio on the Skype for Business Application

1. Click on the gear on the Skype Screen. 

2. Select Audio Device from the list of items on the left side of the screen. 

3. Select the “Speakers/Headphones (Realtek(R) Audio)” at the drop-down 

for “Speaker”.
3

4. If you cannot be heard on the Skype call, make sure that your 

Microphone setting is set to “Microphone Array (Realtek(R) Audio)”

5. Click the Ok button. The audio is now set properly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HOENIG
GROUP INC. SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      29,083,643
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,213,851
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         22,107,614
<PP&E>                                       2,333,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              80,773,202
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                   7,172,232
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             125,637
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,065
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,506,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,773,202
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         2,093,455
<COMMISSIONS>                               63,810,115
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                9,338,435
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                              19,013,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,313,941
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,471,296
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, John J. Schickling, Chief Financial Officer of Phase Forward Incorporated (the "Company"), in connection with the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

| |  | By: |  | /s/JOHN J. SCHICKLINGJohn J. Schickling
Chief Financial Officer
Phase Forward Incorporated
November 9, 2004
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Before the Third Division,

February 24, 1954

No. 57878.

#### Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 194667-K, etc. (New York).

*415Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of china figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

April 5, 1962

No. 66670.

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/19773, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decharacterized horsemeat, fresh, chilled, or frozen, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66254, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IB

Union Calendar No. 80

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1104

[Report No. 106–141]

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative jurisdiction over land within the boundaries of the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site to the Archivist of the United States for

the construction of a visitor center.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

MAY 13, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative jurisdiction over land within the boundaries of

the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic

Site to the Archivist of the United States for the construction of a visitor center.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1104 RH

1 SECTION 1. VISITOR CENTER FOR HOME OF FRANKLIN D.

2 ROOSEVELT NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, HYDE

3 PARK, NEW YORK.

4 (a) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDIC5 TION.—The Secretary of the Interior may transfer to the

6 Archivist of the United States administrative jurisdiction

7 over land located in the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt

8 National Historic Site, for use by the Archivist for the

9 construction of a visitor center facility to jointly serve the

10 Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site and

11 the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library, located in

12 Hyde Park, New York.

13 (b) CONDITIONS OF TRANSFER.—

14 (1) PROTECTION OF HISTORIC SITE.—The

15 transfer authorized in subsection (a) shall be subject

16 to an agreement between the Secretary and the Ar17 chivist that shall include such provisions for the pro18 tection of the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt Na19 tional Historic Site and the joint use of the facility

20 to be constructed as the Secretary and the Archivist

21 may consider necessary.

22 (2) CONSIDERATION.—A transfer made pursu23 ant to subsection (a) shall be made without consider24 ation or reimbursement.

25 (3) TERMINATION.—If use by the Archivist of

26 the land referred to in subsection (a) is terminated
3

•HR 1104 RH

1 by the Archivist at any time, administrative jurisdic2 tion over the land shall automatically revert to the

3 Department of the Interior.

4 (c) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in

5 subsection (a) shall consist of not more than 1 acre of

6 land as may be mutually agreed to by the Secretary and

7 the Archivist and more particularly described in the agree8 ment required under subsection (b)(1).
Union Calendar No. 80

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1104

[Report No. 106–141]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transcenter. the United States for the construction of a visitor sevelt National Historic Site to the Archivist of the boundaries of the Home of Franklin D. Roo- fer administrative jurisdiction over land within

MAY 13, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Case No. 14,914.

#### UNITED STATES v. DAMIANI et al.

[See Case No. 14,915.]
No. 52130.

protests 108067-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Pasto Miel the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co.*v. *United States*(18 Cust. Ct, 128, C. D. 1056). In view of the stipulation and on authority of the decision cited the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10.2

MEMORANDUM                                                   PANAMERICAN BANCORP

TO:     Compensation Meeting

CC:

FROM:   M. Golden

DATE:   12/9/2002

RE:     executive pay package for 2003, for Castro, Modder

Salary & Bonus arrangement

This arrangement starts with the salary for the executives as described below
and then pays a bonus or reduces the salary. It depends on whether the preset
goal is obtained or not.

Described as follows:

1. If the minimum goals are not reached then a predetermined amount under the
schedule will be deducted in the following Q from the base salary.

2. If in any future Q, after a reduction, the goal is obtained then the salary
will then be reset to the previous level.

SEE: SALARY BONUS REDUCTION COMPENSATION SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER DETAILS

THE BASE SALARIES ARE AS FOLLOWS:

PHIL MODDER.  .................  $125,000
HUGO CASTRO   .................  $130,000.             [ILLEGIBLE]

Benefits to executives:

     1)   $900.00 car allowance, all inclusive of all auto expenses

     2)   Health Benefits

     3)   Vacation pay, 4 weeks

     4)   T&E with a max of $500.00 in any month.

     5)   Life insurance (to be reviewed and determined at a later date)

                                                                               1
May 20, 2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washingt on, DC 20590

The Honorable John F. Kerry

Secretary of State

US Department of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, DC 20520

Dear Secretar y Foxx and Secretary Kerry :

Visit Baltimore believes strongly that Open Skies agreements should be preserved

. By providing more

competition and increased capacity and cho ices in the air travel market, these agreements benefit

individual consumers

, the entire travel industry and America's economy through visitor spending, tax

generation and job creation

. They are e ssential to ensure continued growth in international travel to and

from the U.S. including destinations like Baltimore.

International leisure vi sitors already account for 9% of Baltimore ’ s $5.15 bill i on visitor economy . T hanks

to local infrastructure investments and the addition of new routes and new carriers a t regional airports

, Baltimore is poised to share its East C oast accessibility, history, c ulture an d charm with even more

international visitors

. W e need your support to continue this positive momentum

.

An i mportant factor driving recent increases in overall inbound international travel has been the increased

competition from new service and new ent rants into the American market from places like India, the

Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia

. T argeting t he se centers of global aviation and airlines like

Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways put s the entire Open Skies framework at risk . We need these carr iers

to help bring traveler s to B altimore and destinations throughout the country for business and leisure

purposes

.

I urge you not to limit the Gulf carriers' access to the U.S. P reserve Op en Skies

.

Submitted respectfully,

Tom Noonan

President & CEO
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. of our report dated January 26, 2001,
included in the 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders of Penn Engineering &
Manufacturing Corp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
26, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Penn
Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000, in the following
registration statements:

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan Form S-8
     Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-20101);

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
     Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-13073);

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan for
     Non-Employee Directors Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No.
     333-92907); and

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan Form
     S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92903).



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2001