alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Boone County Regional Airport PO Box 1114 Harrison, AR 72602

(870) 741

- 6954

Sept. 16, 2011
Dennis DeVany EAS & Domestic Analysis Division Office of Aviation Analysis, X

- 53 U.S. Dept. of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Docket DOT

- OST

- 1997

- 2935

Dear Mr. DeVany,
The Boone County Airport Administrative Board is unanimous in their decision to select SeaPort Air to remain as our Essential Air Service carrier . This decision is supported by the City of Harrison and Harrison Chamber of Commerce.

SeaPort Air has proven over the past two years that they care about our communities travel needs and perform on

- time operations with minimum cancellations. Our boarding’s have increased by 77% in one year as we continue to work together in order establish air service in our community after a n 18 month period with no service. In providing Harrison with flights to Memphis and Kansas City we accommodate both our business travel to Memphis and leisure travelers with low cost connections in Kansas City.
Air Choice One is not a good fit for us as service to St. Louis does not meet our needs. The only use we can see for STL is for St. Louis and the surrounding area flying Air Choice One to Harrison in order to spend a weekend in Branson, MO. That is not serving our community and does not fit the model of what EAS is all about. We have surveyed our community and not one of our local businesses have any business connections in St. Louis, with that we feel it would be a blow to our economic development.

We feel strongly that SeaPort gives us the best opportunity to continue air service without EAS in the future and sincerely hope you will select SeaPort Air to continue serving Harrison

. In the two years they have provided service we have not had one complaint about the service.
Sincerely, Judy McCutcheon, Airport Manager
No. R67/36.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/7448, R60/7449, and R61/1341 (New York).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f.o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,926                  92,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,940                  18,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,280                   2,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,352                 127,512
<PP&E>                                         151,141                 145,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,144,479               1,201,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,272                  44,139
<BONDS>                                        690,300                 785,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,163                  16,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,144,479               1,201,054
<SALES>                                          2,625                   3,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,545                  48,918
<CGS>                                            5,250                   6,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,523                  37,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    91                     (6)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,241)                (18,082)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,421                 (7,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,898)                   2,687
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,523                 (4,908)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 (5,902)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,523                (10,810)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 405 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.405
                                    Agreed to September 22, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Clerk of the House of Representatives, in the enrollment of 
the bill (H.R. 4919) to amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and 
the Arms Export Control Act to make improvements to certain defense and 
security assistance provisions under those Acts, to authorize the 
transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign countries, and for other 
purposes, shall make the following corrections:
        (1) On page 34, line 1, insert ``on a grant basis'' after 
    ``available''.
        (2) On page 34, line 11, strike ``paragraph (1)'' and insert 
    ``subsection (b)(1) and paragraph (1) of this subsection''.
        (3) On page 36, line 19, insert ``on a grant basis'' after 
    ``available''.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 99.1


Press Release

WAYPOINT FINANCIAL CORP. COMPLETES SECOND STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM AND ANNOUNCES
NEW REPURCHASE PROGRAM


Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (August 22, 2002) - Waypoint Financial Corp. (Nasdaq:
WYPT) today announced that it has completed the repurchase of 1,896,000 shares
authorized by its Board of Directors on February 22, 2002 and has been
authorized by the Board to repurchase up to an additional 1,800,000 shares or
approximately 5% of its outstanding shares.

The current share repurchase authorization is the company's third since the
October 17, 1000 completion of the Company's stock offering and merger with York
Financial Corp. Shares will be repurchased through open market or negotiated
transactions and will be held by the company as treasury stock. The number of
shares repurchased and the timing of such transactions will depend upon market
conditions and the implementation of other corporate strategies.

Waypoint Financial Corp. is the bank holding company for Waypoint Bank, a $5.3
billion bank headquartered in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania with a network of 58
branches. Waypoint Bank operates 50 branches in Dauphin, York, Lancaster,
Cumberland and Lebanon countries in southcentral Pennsylvania and 8 branches in
Baltimore, Harford and Washington counties in northern Maryland. Waypoint
Financial Corp. was created in October 2000 by the merger of Harris Financial,
Inc. and York Financial Corp.

Contact:

         Waypoint Financial Corp.
         James H. Moss
         (717) 909-2247
No. 54478.

#### International Fisheries Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 152312-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn WestEnergy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Todd Takeyasu, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Penn West Petroleum Ltd., who performs the same function for theTrust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Todd Takeyasu                                                                 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Todd Takeyasu                                                                     |   |
|   | Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer  of Penn West Petroleum Ltd. |   |

 

March 27, 2009

 

----
4k. wv>^K/?Ato. o^-vs'-ObCbW-cv; xu filedin ".i>A . ;nr? Appeals Thec°urt of Appeals Sixth Disrnct Civfh n;~f,.;_+ App€-tloA <> NOV 2 42015 'isxarkana. Texas?? « 

### yj BasraA^Cter^ Co^V Ot J$$%(?'Texas , , > Uedrfe^^Aatrey, Clerk


### -Vo pcou^e \nior, sow. Vfp«_ oQ c^nW^ hM Co^ u (^ cee^pV oQ Wi €/\tef£ op^imj oo*U iVvo^ \Vx Su^orV-As £o|/t>^ . YV^so/*^. Ap(i«Ala/A-nj&^i oorv^r/^^on 4W*V-Vk. Uw^ <U^\h 4ic\ c-ecaWc-fkjL



### imW &nsU^ pcocwAl^ fn^«* cou/4 £leA<n V»o-o7.j^c*|- -AffeA\a\\& (V^on ?V^VjlCouu-H*to co^rw- Q_£aup\o^e^Wf.Me-f pye, |of3

## (f3 ticA. V-VA of C£i_£^£_ AW*A /w^ "A op4tes eaVi-ie pU«^ •v>Qr°^ occasions b'-f A^UoaV -Vo -e/uare €^c^i <^6 e^-e^y psj£-



### CcVWa^ . AQ<^\\flnSr m>~> ce^e^\UcJ^ -ttvfc Coua\ ^q^ ensure4<a*\ t^Kax4t-^ Sov>^. f^ £c<*oneA ^co^e^ Q^(c?r cecor^-e^ by vJ^q^qkAT


### Afjfc\WJU (vv^fw WIWC^oH^Coo&fr'v (^uu)p\o^-^aVre <U&t ppe^-ofja,\ot>\& &>C £c\oV>V o^ Col (?&$&$ ' AaV^kA 4te Cou/V To vW /n^/Vtflrt/rt.f 64 *Ve io^ •essore. 4WiV aft p4^S ore C€/Cac&«&«l"W*V ^>^ uJv&aAhe

C<*AWa p^\^ \v^_ Lo^\ oa. acMoB--H\<A- <* cjoaW^ui uoas a^ ^^ a>t\*/\



### eAvdo^ ^^^ vo ^ SikHi CviWcV u^ <**«** i*> ^^ju& UnL 

### l^ ^ **V. ;AmAj.a -rnc.-n^ a* fHvir ~ Af^tAWVi ^oV\0A ^or^>e CowrV^D C^f/vv (bo/pV £>£-£4ye fitv^p^^o-^J
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Fuego Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Hugo M.
        Cancio, in my capacity as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  **COMPANY
                NAME CORPORATION**Date:
                September 15, 2006
              By:
              /s/
                Hugo
                M. CancioHugo
                  M. Cancio
                Principal
                  Accounting
                  Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, J. Nick Riehle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation (the Evaluation Date); and

c. disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annaul report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                          
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/    J. NICK
RIEHLE                                                    
|                    |  |     |  | J. Nick Riehle Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE FIRST FISCAL QUARTER 10-QSB FOR INSCI'S 2000 FISCAL YEAR
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000878612
<NAME>     m7rpwrt@

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            797
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3339
<ALLOWANCES>                                      100
<INVENTORY>                                        83
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4398
<PP&E>                                           1806
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3510
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        16
<COMMON>                                           88
<OTHER-SE>                                       4533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8147
<SALES>                                          2420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2420
<CGS>                                            1070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (767)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (767)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (767)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
Case No. 14,331.

#### The UNA.

[5 Ben. 198; 1 14 Int. Rev. Rec. 6.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

June, 1871.

Collision— Master— Presumption op Absence.

1. The master of a vessel has authority, as such, to maintain an action in his own name for damages to such vessel by collision.

2. The owner of a foreign vessel, in such a case, is presumed to be absent till the contrary is shown.

[Cited in The Tillie, Case No. 14.049.)

In admiralty.

Stevens & Reymert, for. libellant.

Beebe, Donohue & Cooke, for claimants.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

This is a cause of collision, to recover for the damages caused to the Norwegian bark Elizabeth by a collision which took place between her and the lighter Una in the harbor of New York, on the 16th of July, 1868. The fault of the Una is admitted. In the libel, the li-bellant, Edward M. Jensen, describes himself as having been the master, the managing owner, and the ship’s husband, of the bark, at the time of the collision. The answer admits that he was the master of the bark, but denies that he held any other relation to her, and takes the objection that he has no right to maintain this action in his own name. There is no proof that he sustained any other relation to the vessel than that of her master. But, his authority as master was sufficient to authorize him to bring this suit in his own name. Ben. Adm. (2d Ed.) § 384; Houseman v. The North Carolina. 15 Pet. [40 U. S.] 40, 49; McKinlay v. Morrish, 21 How. [62 U. S.] 343, 355; The Commander in Chief, 1 Wall. [68 U. S.] 43, 51. His position as master constituted him so far agent for the owners of the vessel, who, as the vessel is shown to be a Norwegian vessel, must be presumed to be absent until the contrary is shown, that he could bring this suit in his own name, and receive on behalf of such owners the damages awarded.

On the merits, I award to the libellant $108 43, with interest from July 30th. 1868, rejecting the item of $20 for superintendence. I also reject the claim for demurrage and for permanent deterioration, and award no costs to either party as against the other.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000876645
<NAME> PHARMCHEM, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                       374
<INVENTORY>                                      1,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,577
<PP&E>                                          21,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,185
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,144
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (200)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,612
<INCOME-TAX>                                       553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,059
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.70

SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THAT 2012 HOME SERVICES

PROVIDER AGREEMENT

This Sixth Amendment (the “Sixth Amendment”) to that certain DIRECTV, Inc. 2012 Home Services Provider Agreement dated October 15, 2012 (the “Agreement”) by and Multiband Field Services, Inc. (“Contractor”), and DIRECTV, LLC (“DIRECTV”), is hereby made and entered into this first (1) day of January, 2014 (the “Sixth Amendment Effective Date”), as follows:

1.       Amendment. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto amend the Agreement, pursuant to paragraph 16 and paragraph 25.d. thereof, as follows:

A.   Section 15. Section 7 (“Term”) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

7.       Term. The term (the “Term”) of this Agreement shall be effective as of the date written above (the “Effective Date”) and shall continue until December 31, 2017. The Term will automatically renew thereafter for additional, individual one-year periods (each such year a “Renewal Term”), unless either Contractor or DIRECTV gives written notice of termination at least ninety (90) days in advance of expiration of the then-current Term. The Agreement shall also be terminable for “cause” as set forth herein.

2.       Counterparts. This Sixth Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

Except as expressly provided in this Sixth Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Sixth Amendment through their duly authorized representatives as of January 1, 2014.

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

 

| Multiband Field Services, Inc. |                    | DIRECTV, LLC |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------|
| By:                            | /s/ Steve Bell          |         | By: | /s/ Michael J. Wittrock |
| Name:                          | Steve Bell              |         | Name: | Michael J. Wittrock |
| Title:                         | Chief Financial Officer |         | Title: | Senior Vice President |