alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10892)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 2465; 6195.

(Decided February 2, 1965)

*Tomplcins & Tomplcins*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above have been submitted for decision upon the following’ stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the automobiles' specified on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by the above reappraisement appeals, that were appraised at $1,469.00 each, net, packed (Canadian dollars) consist of automobiles manufactured in England, and imported into the United States from Ganada.

> That there was no “foreign value,” or “export value,” or “United States value,” as defined in Sections 402(c), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the automobiles under appeal at the time of exportation thereof.

> That in determining the “cost of production” value as defined in Section 402 (f) of said Act, the Appraiser included in his above value of $1,469 each, net, a cost of $93.18 or $93.82 or $90.73 Canadian dollars (as shown on the invoices) representing a Canadian excise tax, as well as a cost of $139.77, or $140.72, or $136.02 (as shown on the invoices) representing a Canadian sales tax. That said Canadian excise taxes and sales taxes were paid to the Canadian government prior to exportation to the United States, but they were refunded after exportation, under the same circumstances and conditions involved in the cases of *John V. Carr & Son, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 10442, and *Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 10666, and that the record in said *John V. Carr & Son, Inc.*case and in said *Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc.*case may be incorporated as a part of the record in these cases.

> Plaintiff limits its appeals to the claim that said excise taxes of $93.18, or $93.82, or $90.73, and the said sales taxes of $139.77, or $140.72, or $136.02 should not be included as a part of the cost of production dutiable value.

> The appeals set forth above are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts and the records in the cited cases, which are incorporated herein, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the automobiles covered by these appeals for reappraisement and appraised at a value of $1,469 each, net, packed (Canadian dollars), and that such value is the appraised value of $1,469 each, net, packed (Canadian dollars), less $93.18, or $98.82, or $90.73 (Canadian), as shown on the invoices, representing *497a Canadian excise tax, less $139.77, or $140.72, or $136.02 (Canadian), as shown on the invoices, representing a Canadian sales tax.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

         We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
the Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related prospectus of Wavo Corporation
for the registration of 1,007,500 shares of its common stock and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated January 25, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Wavo Corporation included
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
October 18, 1999
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 396

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Celebrating the birth of James Madison and his

contributions to the Nation.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 396

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas March 16, 2001, is the 250th anniversary of the

birth of James Madison, Father of the United States

Constitution and fourth President of the United States;

Whereas the ideals of James Madison, as expressed in the

Constitution he conceived for the American Nation and

in the principles of freedom he established in the Bill of
2

•HCON 396 EH

Rights, are the foundations of American Government and

life;

Whereas James Madison’s lifetime of public service, as a

member of the Virginia House of Delegates, as a delegate

to the Continental Congress during the American Revolution, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in

1787, as a leader in the House of Representatives, as

Secretary of State, and as the Nation’s fourth President,

are an inspiration to all men, women, and children in the

conduct of their personal and private lives; and

Whereas the ideals and inspiring example of James Madison

are of utmost importance to the future of the American

Nation as it enters a new millennium: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the historical significance of

4 James Madison’s birth, as well as his contributions

5 to the Nation during his lifetime;

6 (2) urges all American patriotic and civil asso7 ciations, labor organizations, schools, universities,

8 historical societies, and communities of learning and

9 worship, together with citizens throughout the

10 United States, to develop appropriate programs and

11 educational activities to recognize and celebrate the

12 life and achievements of James Madison; and

13 (3) requests that the President issue a procla14 mation recognizing the 250th anniversary of the
3

•HCON 396 EH

1 birth of James Madison and calling upon the people

2 of the United States to observe the life and legacy

3 of James Madison with appropriate ceremonies and

4 activities.

Passed the House of Representatives October 2,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit
23.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Cyalume Technologies Holdings, Inc. (formerly Vector Intersect Security Corp.)
(a corporation in the development stage) in the Post-Effective Amendment No.1 of
Form S3 (No. 333-127644), of our report dated April 10, 2008, on our audit of
the financial statements of Cyalume Technologies Holdings, Inc. (formerly Vector
Intersect Security Corp.) (a corporation in the development stage) as of
December 31, 2007, for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the period from
July 19, 2005 (inception) through December 31, 2007 appearing in the Annual
Report on Form l0-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31,
2008.




We also
consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.





/s/
Miller, Ellin & Company, LLP


CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




New York,
New York


April 17,
2009





S -
6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [BLM_ES_FRN_MO4500174413]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces changes to the mailing and street address for the Northeastern States District Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

# DATES:

The date for the changes will be on or about November 1, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Richard Navarro, Assistant District Manager for Support Services, BLM Northeastern States District; (414) 297-4419;                         *rdnavarro@blm.gov.*                         Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 7-1-1 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the United States.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The mailing and street address for the BLM Northeastern States District Office will be changed from 626 E Wisconsin Ave., Suite 200, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 to 250 E Wisconsin Ave., Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.

*Authority:*                     Departmental Manual 382, Chapter 2.1.                

Mitchell Leverette,

BLM Eastern States State Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-23170 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4331-18-P
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.17


                         AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT

         Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated
as of December 22, 1996 (the "Option Agreement"), between BRIAN F. KING (the
"Optionee") and CONCORD CAMERA CORP. ("Concord"), as the same was amended and
restated as of December 22, 1996 in connection with that certain letter
agreement dated September 19, 2002, pursuant to which Option Agreement the
Optionee has an option (the "Option") to purchase 45,000 shares (adjusted to
reflect the two-for-one split of Concord's common stock effected April 14, 2000
and all exercises made before July 31, 2002 under the original option agreement
dated as of December 22, 1996) of Concord's no par common stock (the "Common
Stock").

         FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Option Agreement is hereby amended, effective
as of February 11, 2003, to permit the Optionee to elect to defer the delivery
of the Common Stock he would acquire pursuant to an exercise of the Option. Any
such deferral will be subject to the terms and conditions of Concord's Deferred
Delivery Plan (the "Plan"), a copy of which has been provided separately, and,
when purchasing Option Shares pursuant to the Plan, the payment provisions of
the Plan will apply instead of the provisions in Section 8 of the Option
Agreement regarding methods for payment of the Purchase Price.

         Unless otherwise provided herein, all capitalized terms shall have the
meaning assigned to such terms in the Option Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.

                                          CONCORD CAMERA CORP.


                                          By:    /s/  Richard M. Finkbeiner
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Richard M. Finkbeiner
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer



                                          OPTIONEE:


                                          /s/  Brian F. King
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Brian F. King
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 24

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal

the twenty-second amendment relating to Presidential term limitations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1999

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to repeal the twenty-second amendment relating

to Presidential term limitations.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 24 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘The twenty-second article of amendment to the Con3 stitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 124 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 124

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2000

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``November 4, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION OF 10-KSB REPORTOFCHINA ENERGY CORPORATIONFOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2007
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of China Energy Corporation. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-KSB Report of China Energy Corporation for the year ended November 30, 2007.

2. We certify that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-KSB report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Energy Corporation.

This Certification is executed as of March 13, 2008.



| | /s/ WenXiang Ding WenXiang DingPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Fu XuFu XuSecretary and Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------

---
No. 54488.

#### American Express Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 144550-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
## LONG CHAIN CHLORINATED PARAFFIN PRODUCTS SOLD TO LUBRICANT INDUSTRY
TRUCK UNLOADING TO STORAGE

TOTE UNLOADING (150 kg/batch) BASE OIL AND VARIETY OF OTHER ADDITIVES (850 kg/batch)

CUSTOMER PERSONNEL EXPOSURE POINT NO RELEASE POINT OCCURS IN PROCESS CPAR STORAGE (LUBRICANTS) FORMULATION MIXING (1,000 kg /batch) END PRODUCT PACKAGING END PRODUCT LUBRICANT SALES X A PRODUCT SOLD BY TRUCK FOR LUBRICANT FORMULATION

C PRODUCT SOLD BY TOTE FOR LUBRICANT FORMULATION

B
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 17
- 00156
- CR

Veronica Trevino, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF TRAVIS COUN TY

NO. C
- 1
- CR
- 15
- 206668 THE HONORABLE NANCY WRIGHT HOHENGARTEN, JUDGE PR ESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due April 20, 2017. On counsel’s motions, the time for filing was extended to July 21, 2017. Appellant’s counsel has now filed a fourth motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than August 21, 2017

. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the
refe rral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered o n July 28, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland
Do Not Publish
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 82

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 82

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting
2

•HJ 82 EH

1 ‘‘November 23, 1999’’. Public Law 106–46 is amended by

2 striking ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘November

3 23, 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
{"agency":"FERC","generated":"2019-04-26 16:00:45","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2019"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FERC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["40"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["34"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["13"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2019","quarter":"Q2"}
# L_2022156EN.01016001.xml

| 9.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/160 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/160

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/397 of 9 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022
  )

On page 51, in the Annex, in the table headed ‘Persons’, in entry 806 relating to Igor Nikolayevich MOROZOV, in the column headed ‘Identifying information’:

for:

‘DOB: 13.10.1956
  ’,

read:

‘DOB: 10.12.1956
  ’;

on page 59, in the Annex, in the table headed ‘Persons’, in entry 872 relating to Alexandra Gennadyevna ZHUKOVA, in the column headed ‘Name’:

for:

‘Alexandra Gennadyevna ZHUKOVA’,

read:

‘Anastasia Gennadyevna ZHUKOVA’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 59 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 59

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
          prohibiting courts from levying or increasing taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1999

   Mr. Manzullo introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
          prohibiting courts from levying or increasing taxes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Neither the Supreme Court, nor any inferior court of the United 
States, nor the court of any State in its application of laws under 
this Constitution or any Federal law, shall have the power to instruct 
or order a State or political subdivision thereof, or an official of 
such State or political subdivision, to levy or increase taxes.''.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2022108EN.01006901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/69 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/505 of 23 March 2022 concerning exemptions from the extended anti-dumping duty on certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 102 of 30 March 2022](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2022_102_R_TOC)
)

On page 22, Article 3, in the table, the line for entry 8085 is replaced with the following:

| | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘8085 | | | | --- | | Oxyprod S.r.l. | | Via G. Morone 4 | | 20121 Milano (MI), Italy | | | | | --- | | Decathlon Produzione Italia S.r.l. | | Via Buonarroti 39 | | 20145 Milano (MI), Italy | | 3.6.2015 for change of name; 20.4.2021 for change of address’ |

---