alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 74248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Enhanced-Use Lease (EUL) of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
Real Property for the Development of Permanent Supportive Housing at 
the Doris Miller VA Medical Center (VAMC), Waco, Texas Campus

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of intent to enter into an EUL.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this Federal Register notice is to provide the 
public with notice that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs intends to 
enter into an EUL of Buildings 19, 20 and 21 on approximately 3.4 acres 
of underutilized land on the campus of the Doris Miller VAMC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Brett Simms, Executive Director, 
Office of Asset Enterprise Management, Office of Management, 810 
Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, 202-632-7092. This is not a 
toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8161, et seq. as 
amended by Public Law 117-168, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs is 
authorized to enter into an EUL, for a term of up to 99 years, that (a) 
provides supportive housing for Veterans and their families, or (b) 
enhances the use of the leased property by directly or indirectly 
benefitting Veterans. Additionally, the EUL must not be inconsistent 
with and not adversely affect VA's mission or the operation of VA's 
facilities, programs and services in the area of the leased property. 
Consistent with this authority, the Secretary intends to enter into an 
EUL for the purpose of outleasing Buildings 19, 20 and 21 on 
approximately 3.4 acres of underutilized land on the campus of the 
Doris Miller VAMC, to develop approximately 34 units of permanent 
supportive housing for Veterans and their families. The competitively 
selected EUL lessee/developer, Wellington Waco USA, LP, will finance, 
design, develop, renovate, construct, manage, maintain and operate 
housing for eligible homeless Veterans or Veterans at risk of 
homelessness on a priority placement basis. Additionally, the lessee/
developer will be required to provide supportive services that guide 
Veteran residents towards long-term independence and self-sufficiency.

Signing Authority

    Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved and signed 
this document on October 19, 2023, and authorized the undersigned to 
sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for 
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of 
General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-23818 Filed 10-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
# L_2022102EN.01003301.xml

| 30.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/33

---

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/507

of 29 March 2022

confirming the participation of Ireland in Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to the notification by Ireland of its wish to accept and be bound by Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | By letter of 7 February 2022, Ireland formally notified its wish, in accordance with Article 4 of Protocol No 21, to accept and be bound by Regulation (EU) 2021/1147. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By letter of 7 February 2022, Ireland formally notified its wish, in accordance with Article 4 of Protocol No 21, to accept and be bound by Regulation (EU) 2021/1147.

| (2) | There are no conditions attached to the participation of Ireland in Regulation (EU) 2021/1147. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

There are no conditions attached to the participation of Ireland in Regulation (EU) 2021/1147.

| (3) | In accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 331(1) of the Treaty, the Commission should therefore confirm the participation of Ireland in Regulation (EU) 2021/1147, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 331(1) of the Treaty, the Commission should therefore confirm the participation of Ireland in Regulation (EU) 2021/1147,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The participation of Ireland in Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 is confirmed.

2.   Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 shall apply to Ireland, in accordance with this Decision, from 7 February 2022.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2022.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 15.7.2021, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 128 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 128

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2000

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``December 11, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
Casco Algoma

Kewaunee

OE E

Two

Creeks

Kewaunee

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

.

.

...

. . . . .

.

650

600

650

600

700

¬«42

LAKESHORE DR

MARQUETTE DR

KILBOURN ST

WI-42 N MAIN ST

Lake

Michigan

44°

30"

87°

30'

49

49

44°

87°

25'

65

49

49

4

E

49

49

49

49

000

61 68 650

15

30"

49

4

4 63 4 4 4

21

4

19

30"

49

E

000m 67

27'

68

44°

30"

25

63 4

49

FEET

49

30" FEET 66

22'

N

4

49

49

49

49

49

49

30'

000

4

87°

4

000m

49

4 22' 22'

30' 64

27'

4

250

19

49

210

49

69

49

66 4

17

25'

2 4

27'

22

22'

18

25'

2

49

24

17

16

24

000m

26

N

4

25

20

14

23

18

49

61 000

15

49

26

49

64

4

67

30"

87°

14

25'

22

FEET

44°

16

21

49

27'

000

000m

30"

20

27

30"

27

630

FEET 4

30'

62 65 69

62

KEWAUNEE OE E, WI

2013

Expressway Local Connector

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

Secondary Hwy Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

KEWAUNEE OE E QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN-KEWAUNEE CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

Imagery..................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2013

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1998

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 16T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983 (central

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.12

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

DQ

16T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 18 ́

5 MILS

4° 23 ́

78 MILS
Before the First Division,

November 8, 1956

No. 60328.

protests 183248-K, etc. (New York).

#### S. Stern, Henry & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 55082.

#### Monarch Watch Co. *v.*United States,

protests 113146-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked *“A”*or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the *325base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements"more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as watch movements more than *%<>*of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
No. 51252.

#### Protest 112089-K of Loucraft Corp. (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328); that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrel No. 2364 was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination, due to breakage, leakage, or damage; and that said loss appears from the gauger’s return verified by a timely affidavit of the importer. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

EAST HILL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND WILLIAM C. HUYLER, III,

Respondents

v.

STEVEN AND ALINA VOLKOVA

- BURDA,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 70 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of September, 2019

, the Application for Nunc Pro Tunc

Reconsideration is DENIED

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10370

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AUSENCIO ESTRADA-MONTALVO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:08-CR-9-ALL

Before SMITH, STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ausencio Estrada-Montalvo appeals the 90-month sentence imposed

following his conviction by guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation. See

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). Estrada-Montalvo argues that the district court

erroneously believed that it lacked the authority to vary from the advisory

guidelines range based on the Government’s refusal to move for an additional

level decrease under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b). The district court’s decision not to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 14, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10370

2

grant a variance does not indicate that it believed that it lacked the authority to

impose a non-guidelines sentence. The totality of the circumstances reveals that

the district court denied the requested variance because it believed that a within

guidelines sentence was appropriate. See UnitedStates v. Newson, 515 F.3d 374,

379 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 2522 (2008). 

Estrada-Montalvo argues that the case should be remanded for

resentencing because the Government declined to file a motion for an additional

level decrease under § 3E1.1(b), amounting to an “incorrect application of the

Guidelines.” We review the Government’s refusal to move for the additional

level decrease to determine whether that refusal was based on an

unconstitutional motive or was not rationally related to a legitimate end. See

Newson, 515 F.3d at 378-79. Estrada-Montalvo does not argue that the

Government’s refusalto file the motion was based on an unconstitutional motive;

a defendant’s refusal to waive his right to appeal is a basis rationally related to

the purposes of § 3E1.1(b). See id. Estrada-Montalvo argues that the district

court erred in refusing to award him the additional level decrease for acceptance

of responsibility under § 3E1.1(b), but, as he concedes, the argument is

foreclosed by Newson. See Newson, 515 F.3d at 378. 

Estrada-Montalvo argues that the district court erred in assessing the 16-

level crime of violence increase based on his prior conviction for burglary of a

habitation in reliance on his Texas judicial confession, but, as he concedes, his

argument challenging the district court’s reliance on his judicial confession is

foreclosed by United States v. Garcia-Arellano, 522 F.3d 477, 481 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 129 S. Ct. 353 (2008).

AFFIRMED.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Suodor Al-Khair Co - ) 

SAKCO for General Trading ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91GY0-08-C-0025 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037 

Mr. Ahmed S. Najm 

Owner 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

Erica S. Beardsley, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK DISMISSING THE 

APPEALS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 

These appeals arise from the contract referred to above. As more fully described in 

the Board's prior ruling partially granting the government's motion to dismiss ASBCA 

No. 59036, and denying its motion to dismiss ASBCA No. 59037, appellant appeals from 

the contracting officer's denial of its claim for $72,077.33, and assertion of a claim against 

appellant for $65,763.13. See Suodor Al-Khair Co -SAKCO for General Trading, 

ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037, 15-1 BCA ~ 35,964. After that ruling was issued, the Board 

ordered the parties on 28 April 2015 to confer and jointly propose a schedule of 

proceedings. The government provided correspondence in response to that order on 

27 May 2015. The Board ordered appellant to respond to that letter by 18 June 2015. 

Nothing was received. On 4 September 2015, the Board again ordered the parties to 

propose a schedule. On 7 October 2015, the government reported it had been unable to 

communicate with appellant and proposed its own schedule. On 10 November 2015, 

noting the government's statements, the Board ordered appellant to communicate whether 

it intended to continue pursuing these appeals. Nothing was received. On 2 February 

2016, the Board issued an order to appellant to show cause by 12 February 2016 why 

these appeals should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Nothing has been received. 
Accordingly, under Board Rule 17 the appeals are dismissed with prejudice for failure to 

prosecute. See Al Nawars Co., ASBCA No. 59044, 16-1 BCA if 36,234. 

Dated: 21 March 2016 

I concur 

///? 4i::I' 

/ 

a~~-- MARKN. s PLER 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

~~(_~~ MARK A. MELNICK 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037, Appeals of 

Suodor Al-Khair Co - SAKCO for General Trading, rendered in conformance with the 

Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, William P. Horgan, certify that:

         1.I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of Human
Pheromone Sciences, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: November 11, 2003

/s/ William P. Horgan
---------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No. 67261.

protests 273985-K(A) and 273985-K(B) (New York).

#### Catz American Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Plaintiff having raised no objection and following *The Best Foods, Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 1791), the motion was granted.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO  RULES 13A-15(E) AND 15D-15(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date:
March 29, 2007/s/ Robert E. FarrRobert E. Farr
Chief Executive Officer