alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              189,737
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        21,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           3,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    129,501
<PP&E>                                              141,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,294,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                53,425
<BONDS>                                             901,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                           (3,995)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,294,804
<SALES>                                               9,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    144,113
<CGS>                                                17,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       113,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        (98)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (60,786)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (31,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         11,566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (20,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (19,148)
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (39,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        


</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

May 17, 1956

No. 59922.

#### Air Express International Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 222533-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that if the certificate of exportation had been filed prior to the liquidation of the entry or the expiration of the collector’s review period provided for in section 515, the merchandise would have been liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1615, as amended, *supra.*In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-13353, No. 333-35455, No. 333-45347, No. 333-39019, No.
333-34127, No. 333-23039, and No. 333-70675) and in the related Prospectuses and
in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-80343, No. 333-41491 and No.
333-68549) pertaining to the registration of the 1998 Employee Incentive Plan,
the 1997 Incentive Plan, the 1995 Incentive Plan, 1995 Nonemployee Director
Stock Plan, 1994 Stock Compensation Plan and Misc. Non-Qualified Stock Options
of WavePhore, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of WavePhore, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                            /s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
March 22, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                             16,963
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>             0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                   12,876
<TRADING-ASSETS>                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>        70,254
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>             0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>               0
<LOANS>                            522,360
<ALLOWANCE>                        3,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     651,857
<DEPOSITS>                         499,210
<SHORT-TERM>                       37,205
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                3,867
<LONG-TERM>                        60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           50
<OTHER-SE>                         51,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>     651,857
<INTEREST-LOAN>                    20,324
<INTEREST-INVEST>                  3,863
<INTEREST-OTHER>                   694
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                   24,881
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 10,097
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 14,191
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              10,690
<LOAN-LOSSES>                      340
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                 72
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    9,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    4,586
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>         2,962
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                     3.26
<LOANS-NON>                        612
<LOANS-PAST>                       136
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                   3,783
<CHARGE-OFFS>                      286
<RECOVERIES>                       70
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                  3,907
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>               3,907
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>            0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW A LLEN WOODS

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

STEPHANIE HERRICK, NP ; CORRECT

CARE SOLUTIONS

,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

.

and

SUMI ERNO,

Defendant. No. 20

- 15693

D.C. No. 3:1 8

- cv

- 0 8255

- DJH

- ESW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Diane H. Humetawa , District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 21 , 2021 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD , and BENNETT , Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Matthew A llen Woods appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 7 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

cou rt’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs

. We have j urisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo

. Toguchi v. Chung

, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

2004 ). W e affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Woods’s

deliberate indifference claim against defendant Herrick because Woods failed to

raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Herrick w as deliberately

indifferent to Woods’ s chronic psoriasis. See id. at 1057

- 60 (a prison official acts

with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive

risk to the prisoner’s health; negligence and a mere difference in medical opinion

are insufficient).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Woods’ s

deliberate indifference claim against defendant Correct Care Solutions because

Woods failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether any policy or

custom of Correct Care Solutions caused him to suffer a constitutional injury. See

Castro v. County of Los Angeles , 833 F.3d 1060, 1073

- 76 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc)

(discussing requirements to establish liability under Monell v. Department of

Social Services , 436 U.S. 658 (1978)); Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc. , 698 F.3d 1128,

1139 (9th Cir. 2012) (a private entity is liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 only if the

entity acted under color of state law and the constitutional violation was caused by3

the entity’s official policy or custom).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time o n

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Woods ’ s motion to compel production of medical records (Docket Entry No.

11) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20038

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL RATHBURN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-95-4578

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this appeal from the district court’s order denying his

motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Michael Rathburn

contends that his criminal conviction violated double jeopardy

because it was preceded by a civil forfeiture pursuant to 21

U.S.C. § 881 (a)(7). A recent opinion by the United States

Supreme Court has rendered this issue frivolous. United States

v. Ursery, 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2147-49 (1996). 
No. 96-20038

- 2 -

 Rathburn argues for the first time on appeal that the civil

forfeiture violated the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth

Amendment. Even assuming that this claim properly was raised in

the district court, it is not cognizable in this § 2255

proceeding. See United States v. Segler, 37 F.3d 1131, 1136-37

(5th Cir. 1994).

 Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2. To the extent that a certificate of appealability (COA)

is required, we construe Rathburn’s notice of appeal as an

application for COA and DENY the motion.

 APPEAL DISMISSED.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 418

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the current level of violence

between the Israelis and the Palestinians.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 2000

Mr. LAZIO (for himself, Mr. GILMAN, and Mr. REYNOLDS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the current

level of violence between the Israelis and the Palestinians.

Whereas the United States has consistently supported the

peaceful resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict;

Whereas the current level of violence between the Israelis and

the Palestinians is the worst in years;

Whereas the current round of violence comes at a time when

the Israeli Government is prepared to make historic compromises towards peace;

Whereas there is clear evidence that this violence was a premeditated and coordinated action by the Palestinian Authority;
2

•HCON 418 IH

Whereas the active participation of armed uniformed Palestinian police in attacks against Israelis is an indication

of the unwillingness of the Palestinian Authority to work

towards a halt to this violence;

Whereas the Palestinian Authority’s encouragement of violence is a violation of the underlying basis on which the

entire Oslo peace process has been built, particularly the

incitement by Palestinian television;

Whereas the Palestinians are mounting a concerted international campaign to justify the violence by blaming

Israel; and

Whereas the Palestinian renunciation of violence in the Oslo

peace process does not provide any basis for the justification of the resumption of violence: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) condemns, in the strongest possible terms,

4 statements and actions by Palestinians designed to

5 inflame and encourage violence;

6 (2) demands that Palestinian Authority Chair7 man Yasser Arafat make a public appeal on Pales8 tinian television for the public to cease further acts

9 of violence;

10 (3) urges the President to use all of the diplo11 matic means available to the United States Govern12 ment to seek an end to the violence and return the

13 Palestinians to the negotiating table;
3

•HCON 418 IH

1 (4) strongly supports actions by the Israeli Gov2 ernment designed to bring this current round of vio3 lence to a peaceful conclusion;

4 (5) urges the Administration to oppose—

5 (A) any United Nations effort to put for6 ward one-sided anti-Israel resolutions or state7 ments; and

8 (B) the establishment of any international

9 commissions of inquiry; and

10 (6) will consider the response of Palestinians to

11 the escalation of violence in their future relations

12 with the United States.

Æ
# L_2022173DE.01013401.xml

| 30.6.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 173/134 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 173/134

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses (EU) 2022/706 der Kommission vom 5. Mai 2022 zur Festlegung von Vorschriften für die Anwendung des Beschlusses Nr. 1313/2013/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die Kriterien und Verfahren für die Anerkennung langjährigen Engagements und außerordentlicher Beiträge zum Katastrophenschutzverfahren der Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 132 vom 6. Mai 2022
  )

Seite 103, Artikel 2 Nummer 3:

Anstatt:

| „3. | ‚außergewöhnliche verdienstliche Leistungen‘ ein sehr hohes Leistungsniveau, das über das Gewöhnliche oder Übliche hinausgeht.“ |
| --- | --- |

„3.

‚außergewöhnliche verdienstliche Leistungen‘ ein sehr hohes Leistungsniveau, das über das Gewöhnliche oder Übliche hinausgeht.“

muss es heißen:

| „3. | ‚außergewöhnliche verdienstvolle Leistungen‘ ein sehr hohes Leistungsniveau, das über das Gewöhnliche oder Übliche hinausgeht.“. |
| --- | --- |

„3.

‚außergewöhnliche verdienstvolle Leistungen‘ ein sehr hohes Leistungsniveau, das über das Gewöhnliche oder Übliche hinausgeht.“.

---
No. 62911.

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 238337-K, etc. (New York).

*335Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(89 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### SERVED JANUARY 2, 2013.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF GRANT AVIATION, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO; FAA-2012-1261
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011AL030075) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C.**Goodwin~** All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel LawOffice ofBrent R. Cole, P.C. 821 N Street, Suite 208 Anchorage, AK '99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002 ONE COPY

GlennH. Brown, Complainant's Counsel Senior Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Alaskan Region Federal Aviation Administration 222 W. 7th Avenue #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: ·202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-1261 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 I 0 0 88

. KENNETH TAYLOR v

. J ACQUELI NE TAYLOR.

Ken n et h Ta yl o r f

i l ed an ap p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal i n t h i s Co u rt

s eek i n g i n t erl o cu t o ry rev i ew o f, i n t er al i a, t he t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d en y i n g hi s m o t i o n

t o s et as i d e a fi n al d i v o rce d e c r e e

. H o wev er, t he Geo rg i a Su p rem e Co u rt h as ju ri s d i ct i o n ov er al l d i v o rce an d al i m o n y cas es , i n cl ud i n g t ho s e cas es an ci l l ary t o t h e
d i v o rc e p r o c e e d i n g s

. See Ga. Co n s t

. 1 9 8 3, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6 ); Mo r r is v.

S u r g es , 2 8 4 Ga. 7 4 8

, 7 50 (2 ) (6 7 0 SE2 d 8 4 ) (2 00 8 ); s ee al s o To d d v. To d d

, 2 8 7 Ga.

2 5 0 (7 0 3 SE2 d 5 9 7 ) (2 01 0 ). Becau se t h e u n d erl y i n g s u bject m at t er o f t h i s ap p eal i s
d i v o rce, i t i s h ereb y

TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p os i t i o n.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/31/2015 December 31, 2015
No. 57867.

protests 177137-K, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52104.

protest 133717-K (New York).

#### R. Maes Export & Import Corp. *v.*United States,

• Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal L 229/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 229 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 605 September 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 229

English edition

Legislation

Volume 605 September 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1521 of 1 September 2017 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2017) 5903)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1521 of 1 September 2017 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2017) 5903)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2017) 5903)

1

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to information on the date of entry into force of the Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros ( OJ L 125, 9.5.2008 ) | 14 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to information on the date of entry into force of the Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros ( OJ L 125, 9.5.2008 )

( OJ L 125, 9.5.2008 )

14

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 35.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

Goal Financial, LLC (the Administrator) hereby certifies
as of December 31, 2006 as follows:



| | 1. | The undersigned has reviewed, for the period beginning January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2006: (a) the activities of the Administrator as they related to the
Administration Agreement dated as of May 25, 2006 (the Administration Agreement) between the Administrator, Goal Capital Funding Trust 2006-1 (the Issuer), Wilmington Trust Company (the Delaware Trustee), The
Bank of New York (the Indenture Trustee) and The Bank of New York (the Eligible Lender Trustee) and (b) the Administrators performance under the Administration Agreement. The performance by the Administrator of its
obligations under the Administration Agreement has been made by persons under the direct supervision of the undersigned.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on my review of the Administrators performance under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Administration Agreement in all material respects for the period beginning January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2006.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This report is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.



GOAL FINANCIAL, LLCBy:

/s/ Seamus GarlandName:

Seamus GarlandTitle:

Secretary
Before the Second Division,

January 11, 1946

No. 50811.

#### Protest 104200-K of Meadows Wye & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items of the merchandise consist of scarves the same in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 50303. Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.