74536 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2023 / Notices 

any persons (petitioner) whose interest 

may be affected by this action may file 

a request for a hearing and petition for 

leave to intervene (petition) with respect 

to the action. Petitions shall be filed in 

accordance with the guidance 

concerning the Commission’s ‘‘Agency 

Rules of Practice and Procedure’’ in 10 

CFR part 2 as discussed in section II.A 

of this document. 

Unless otherwise indicated, the 

Commission has determined that the 

amendments satisfy the criteria for 

categorical exclusion in accordance 

with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant 

to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental 

impact statement or environmental 

assessment need be prepared for these 

amendments. If the Commission has 

prepared an environmental assessment 

under the special circumstances 

provision in 10 CFR 51.12(b) and has 

made a determination based on that 

assessment, it is so indicated in the 

safety evaluation for the amendment. 

For further details with respect to 

these actions, see the amendment and 

associated documents such as the 

Commission’s letter and safety 

evaluation, which may be obtained 

using the ADAMS accession numbers 

indicated in the following table. The 

safety evaluation will provide the 

ADAMS accession numbers for the 

application for amendment and the 

Federal Register citation for any 

environmental assessment. All of these 

items can be accessed as described in 

the ‘‘Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments’’ section of this 

document. 

LICENSE AMENDMENT ISSUANCE(S)—EXIGENT/EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES

DTE Electric Company; Fermi, Unit 2; Monroe County, MI 

Docket No .......................................................................... 50–341. 

Amendment Date ............................................................... September 18, 2023. 

ADAMS Accession No ....................................................... ML23243A885. 

Amendment No .................................................................. 225. 

Brief Description of Amendment(s) .................................... This exigent amendment allowed a one-time extension of the Condition A, completion time, in Fermi 2 Technical Specifications 3.7.2, ‘‘Emergency Equipment Cooling Water (EECW)/Emergency Equipment Service Water (EESW) System and Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS),’’ from 72 hours to 7 days to allow online repairs to the Division I Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower A and C fan pedestals. The one-time extension would be used twice, once for each fan, and will expire at 11:59 p.m. on November 19, 2023. 

Local Media Notice (Yes/No) ............................................. No. 

Public Comments Requested as to Proposed NSHC 

(Yes/No).

No. 

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.; Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Houston County, AL 

Docket No(s) ...................................................................... 50–348, 50–364. 

Amendment Date ............................................................... August 24, 2023. 

ADAMS Accession No ....................................................... ML23235A296. 

Amendment No(s) .............................................................. 247 (Unit 1) and 244 (Unit 2). 

Brief Description of Amendment(s) .................................... The amendments revised Technical Specification (TS) 3.6.5, ‘‘Containment Air Temperature.’’ Specifically, the amendments revised the operating license and approved a one-time NOTE to Appendix A TS 3.6.5, ‘‘Limiting Condition for Operation,’’ to revise the limit on containment average air temperature from ≤120°F to 

≤122°F (Fahrenheit) effective until 0600 hours central time on September 9, 2023. 

The license amendments were issued under emergency circumstances as described in the provisions of 10 CFR 50.91(a)(5), due to the time critical nature of 

the amendment. 

Local Media Notice (Yes/No) ............................................. Yes. 

Public Comments Requested as to Proposed NSHC 

(Yes/No).

No. 

Dated: October 18, 2023. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Victor G. Cusumano, 

Acting Deputy Director, Division of Operating 

Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2023–23382 Filed 10–30–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 50–003, 50–247, and 50–286; 

NRC–2022–0223] 

Holtec Decommissioning International, 

LLC, Holtec Indian Point 2, LLC, and 

Holtec Indian Point 3, LLC, Indian Point 

Nuclear Energy Center 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Environmental assessment and 

finding of no significant impact; 

issuance. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is considering 

issuance of exemptions that would 

permit the licensee to reduce its 

emergency planning (EP) activities at 

the Indian Point Nuclear Generating 

Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, collectively 

referred to as the Indian Point Energy 

Center (IPEC). Specifically, Holtec 

Decommissioning International, LLC 

(HDI), an indirect wholly owned 

subsidiary of Holtec International 

(Holtec) is seeking exemptions on behalf 

of Holtec Indian Point 2, LLC (‘‘Holtec 

IP2’’) and Holtec Indian Point 3, LLC 

(‘‘Holtec IP3’’), the licensees, that would 

eliminate the requirements to maintain 

formal offsite radiological emergency 

plans, as well as reduce the scope of 

some of the onsite EP activities based on 

the reduced risks at IPEC, which is 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2023 / Notices 74537 

permanently shut down and defueled. 

However, requirements for an onsite 

radiological emergency plan and for 

certain onsite capabilities to 

communicate and coordinate with 

offsite response authorities would be 

retained. In addition, offsite EP 

provisions would still exist through 

State and local government use of a 

comprehensive emergency management 

plan process, in accordance with the 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency’s (FEMA’s) Comprehensive 

Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101, 

‘‘Developing and Maintaining 

Emergency Operations Plans.’’ The NRC 

staff is issuing an Environmental 

Assessment (EA) and Finding of No 

Significant Impact (FONSI) associated 

with the proposed exemptions. 

DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in 

this document are available on October 

31, 2023. 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2022–0223 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly available 

information related to this document 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to 

https://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2022–0223. Address 

questions about Docket IDs in 

Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; 

telephone: 301–415–0624; email: 

Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical 

questions, contact the individual listed 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this document. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly 

available documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For 

problems with ADAMS, please contact 

the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) 

reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at 

301–415–4737, or by email to 

PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. For the 

convenience of the reader, instructions 

about obtaining materials referenced in 

this document are provided in the 

‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section of 

this document. 

• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you 

may examine and order copies of 

publicly available documents, is open 

by appointment. To make an 

appointment to visit the PDR, please 

send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov 

or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415– 

4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern 

time (ET), Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl 

Sturzebecher, Office of Nuclear Material 

Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–415– 

8534, email: Karl.Sturzebecher@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

By letter dated February 8, 2017, in 

accordance with sections 50.4(b)(8) and 

50.82(a)(1)(i) to title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 50, 

‘‘Domestic Licensing of Production and 

Utilization Facilities,’’ Entergy Nuclear 

Operations, Inc., Entergy Nuclear Indian 

Point 2, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear 

Indian Point 3, LLC (the IPEC licensees 

at that time, collectively, Entergy) 

notified the NRC that they had decided 

to permanently cease power operations 

at the Indian Point Nuclear Generating 

Unit No. 2 (IP2) by April 30, 2020, and 

at the Indian Point Nuclear Generating 

Unit No. 3 (IP3) by April 30, 2021. 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(ii), by 

letters dated May 12, 2020, and May 11, 

2021, Entergy certified to the NRC that 

the fuel had been permanently removed 

from the IP2 and IP3 reactor vessels and 

placed in the IP2 and IP3 spent fuel 

pools (SFPs). Upon the docketing of 

these certifications, under 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(2), the IP2 and IP3 licenses no 

longer authorize operation of the 

reactors or emplacement or retention of 

fuel into the reactor vessels. The spent 

fuel from IP2 and IP3 is stored in the 

SFPs and in dry cask storage at the 

onsite independent spent fuel storage 

installation (ISFSI) until it is shipped 

offsite. 

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 

No. 1 (IP1) permanently ceased 

operations on October 31, 1974, and all 

fuel was removed from the IP1 reactor 

vessel by January 1976. In 1996, the 

NRC issued an Order approving the 

safe-storage condition of IP1. In 2003, 

the NRC issued Amendment No. 52 to 

IP1’s provisional operating license that 

changed the license’s expiration date to 

be consistent with that of the IP2 license 

at that time. Pursuant to 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(2), the IP1 license no longer 

authorizes operation of the reactor or 

emplacement or retention of fuel into 

the reactor vessel. There is no IP1 spent 

fuel in wet storage at the IPEC site; IP1 

spent fuel is stored onsite in dry cask 

storage in an ISFSI. 

By Order dated November 23, 2020, 

the NRC approved a transfer of the IP 

licenses from Entergy to Holtec 

Decommissioning International, LLC, 

Holtec IP2, LLC (which became the 

licensee of IP1 and IP2), and Holtec IP3, 

LLC (which became the licensee of IP3). 

By letter dated December 22, 2021, as 

supplemented by letters dated February 

1, 2022, February 2, 2022, and May 12, 

2022, HDI, who conducts the 

decommissioning operating services on 

behalf of Holtec IP2 and Holtec IP3, 

requested exemptions from specific 

portions of 10 CFR 50.47, ‘‘Emergency 

plans,’’ and appendix E, ‘‘Emergency 

Planning and Preparedness for 

Production and Utilization Facilities,’’ 

to 10 CFR part 50 for the IPEC licenses. 

More specifically, HDI requested 

exemptions from certain planning 

standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) regarding 

onsite and offsite radiological 

emergency preparedness (REP) plans for 

nuclear power reactors; from certain 

requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) for 

establishment of plume exposure 

pathway and ingestion pathway 

emergency planning zones (EPZs) for 

nuclear power reactors; and from certain 

requirements in 10 CFR part 50, 

appendix E, section IV, ‘‘Content of 

Emergency Plans.’’ 

HDI’s requested exemptions would 

eliminate the NRC requirements to 

maintain formal offsite REP plans in 

accordance with 44 CFR, ‘‘Emergency 

Management and Assistance,’’ part 350, 

‘‘Review and Approval of State and 

Local Radiological Emergency Plans and 

Preparedness,’’ and would reduce the 

scope of the onsite EP activities at IPEC. 

HDI based its request on the reduced 

risks of an offsite radiological release at 

IPEC after permanent cessation of power 

operations and all spent fuel has 

decayed for at least 15 months. The 

exemptions would maintain the 

requirements for an onsite radiological 

emergency plan and would continue to 

ensure the capability to communicate 

and coordinate with offsite response 

authorities. 

The EP requirements of 10 CFR 50.47 

and appendix E to 10 CFR part 50 do 

not distinguish between operating 

reactors and those that have ceased 

operations and defueled. As such, a 

permanently shut down and defueled 

reactor must continue to maintain the 

same EP requirements as an operating 

power reactor under the existing 

regulatory requirements. To establish a 

level of EP commensurate with the 

reduced risks of a permanently shut 

down and defueled reactor, the licensee 

must seek exemptions from certain EP 

regulatory requirements before it can 

change its emergency plans. 

The NRC is therefore considering 

issuing to the licensee the proposed 

exemptions from portions of 10 CFR 

50.47 and appendix E to 10 CFR part 50, 

which would eliminate the 

requirements for the licensee to 

maintain offsite radiological emergency 

plans and reduce some of the onsite EP 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
74538 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2023 / Notices 

activities based on the reduced 

radiological risks as IPEC has 

permanently ceased power operations 

and all spent fuel has decayed for more 

than 15 months. 

Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, 

‘‘Criteria for and identification of 

licensing and regulatory actions 

requiring environmental assessments,’’ 

the NRC has determined that an EA is 

the appropriate form of environmental 

review for the requested action. Based 

on the results of the EA, which is 

provided in Section II of this document, 

the NRC has determined not to prepare 

an environmental impact statement for 

the proposed action and is issuing a 

FONSI. 

II. Environmental Assessment 

Description of the Proposed Action 

The proposed action would exempt 

the licensee from: (1) certain standards 

as set forth in 10 CFR 50.47(b) regarding 

onsite and offsite emergency response 

plans for nuclear power reactors; (2) 

requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) to 

establish plume exposure and ingestion 

pathway EPZs for nuclear power 

reactors; and (3) certain requirements in 

10 CFR part 50, appendix E, section IV, 

which establishes the elements that 

make up the content of emergency 

plans. The proposed action of granting 

these exemptions would eliminate the 

NRC requirements for the licensee to 

maintain offsite radiological emergency 

plans in accordance with 44 CFR part 

350 and reduce some of the onsite EP 

activities at IPEC. However, 

requirements for certain onsite 

capabilities to communicate and 

coordinate with offsite response 

authorities would be retained. 

Additionally, if necessary, offsite 

protective actions could still be 

implemented using a comprehensive 

emergency management plan (CEMP) 

process. A CEMP in this context, also 

referred to as an emergency operations 

plan, is addressed in FEMA’s CPG 101. 

The CPG 101 is the foundation for State, 

territorial, Tribal, and local EP in the 

United States under the National 

Preparedness System. It promotes a 

common understanding of the 

fundamentals of risk-informed planning 

and decision making and assists 

planners at all levels of government in 

their efforts to develop and maintain 

viable, all-hazards, all-threats 

emergency plans. A CEMP is flexible 

enough for use in all emergencies. It 

describes how people and property will 

be protected; details who is responsible 

for carrying out specific actions; 

identifies the personnel, equipment, 

facilities, supplies, and other resources 

available; and outlines how all actions 

will be coordinated. A CEMP is often 

referred to as a synonym for ‘‘allhazards’’ planning. The proposed action 

is in accordance with the licensee’s 

exemption request dated December 22, 

2021, as supplemented by letters dated 

February 1, 2022, February 2, 2022, and 

May 12, 2022. 

Need for the Proposed Action 

The proposed action is needed for the 

licensee to revise the IPEC Emergency 

Plan. Since the certifications for 

permanent cessation of operations and 

permanent removal of fuel from the 

reactor vessels have been docketed, 

pursuant to 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2), the IPEC 

licenses no longer authorize use of the 

facility for power operation or 

emplacement or retention of fuel into 

the reactor vessels and, therefore, the 

occurrence of postulated accidents 

associated with IPEC reactor operation 

is no longer credible. As the EP 

requirements do not distinguish 

between operating reactors and a power 

reactor that has been permanently shut 

down and defueled, the licensee 

requests an exemption from certain EP 

requirements commensurate with the 

radiological risks at the site. 

In its exemption request, the licensee 

identified three possible design-basis 

accidents (DBAs) at IPEC in its 

permanently shut down and defueled 

condition. These are: (1) a fuel handling 

accident in the fuel storage buildings; 

(2) an accidental release of waste gas; 

and (3) an accidental release of waste 

liquid. The licensee also considered the 

consequences of a beyond DBA 

involving a complete loss of SFP water 

inventory and no accompanying heat 

loss (i.e., adiabatic heat up). The NRC 

staff evaluated these possible 

radiological accidents, as well as the 

associated analyses provided by the 

licensee, in the Commission Paper 

(SECY) 22–0102, ‘‘Request by Holtec 

Decommissioning International, LLC for 

Exemptions from Certain EP 

Requirements for the Indian Point 

Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 

3,’’ dated November 18, 2022. 

In SECY–22–0102, the NRC staff 

verified that the licensee’s analyses and 

calculations provided reasonable 

assurance that if the requested 

exemptions were granted, then: (1) for a 

DBA, an offsite radiological release will 

not exceed the early phase protective 

action guides (PAGs) at the exclusion 

area boundary, as detailed in Table 1– 

1, ‘‘Summary Table for PAGs, 

Guidelines, and Planning Guidance for 

Radiological Incidents,’’ to the EPA’s 

‘‘PAG Manual: Protective Action Guides 

and Planning Guidance for Radiological 

Incidents,’’ EPA–400/R–17/001, dated 

January 2017; (2) in the highly unlikely 

event of a beyond DBA resulting in a 

loss of all SFP cooling, there is 

sufficient time to initiate appropriate 

mitigating actions; and (3) in the event 

a radiological release has or is projected 

to occur, there would be sufficient time 

for offsite agencies to take protective 

actions using a CEMP to protect the 

health and safety of the public if offsite 

governmental officials determine that 

such action is warranted. The 

Commission approved the NRC staff’s 

recommendation to grant the 

exemptions based on this evaluation in 

its Staff Requirements Memorandum to 

SECY–22–0102, dated October 24, 2023. 

Based on the licensee’s analyses and 

reduced radiological risks, the licensee 

states that complete application of the 

EP regulations to IPEC 15 months after 

its permanent cessation of power 

operations would not serve the 

underlying purpose of the regulations or 

is not necessary to achieve the 

underlying purpose of the regulations. 

The licensee also states that it would 

incur undue costs in the application of 

operating plant EP requirements for the 

maintenance of an emergency response 

organization in excess of that actually 

needed to respond to the diminished 

scope of credible accidents for IPEC 15 

months after its permanent cessation of 

power operations. 

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed 

Action 

The NRC staff has completed its 

evaluation of the environmental impacts 

of the proposed action. 

The proposed action consists mainly 

of changes related to the elimination of 

NRC requirements for the licensee to 

maintain offsite radiological emergency 

plans in accordance with 44 CFR part 

350 and reduce some of the onsite EP 

activities at IPEC, based on the reduced 

risks once the reactor has been 

permanently shut down for a period of 

15 months. However, requirements for 

certain onsite capabilities to 

communicate and coordinate with 

offsite response authorities will be 

retained and offsite EP provisions to 

protect public health and safety will 

still exist through State and local 

government use of a CEMP. 

With regard to potential 

nonradiological environmental impacts, 

the proposed action would have no 

direct impacts on land use or water 

resources, including terrestrial and 

aquatic biota, as it involves no new 

construction, land disturbance, or 

modification of plant operational 

systems. There would be no changes to 

the quality or quantity of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2023 / Notices 74539 

nonradiological effluents and no 

changes to the plants’ National Pollutant 

Discharge Elimination System permits 

would be needed. In addition, there 

would be no noticeable effect on 

socioeconomic conditions in the region, 

no environmental justice impacts, no air 

quality impacts, and no impacts to 

historic and cultural resources from the 

proposed action. Therefore, there are no 

significant nonradiological 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed action. 

With regard to potential radiological 

environmental impacts, the proposed 

action would not significantly increase 

the probability or consequences of 

radiological accidents. Additionally, the 

NRC staff has concluded that the 

proposed action would have no direct 

radiological environmental impacts. 

There would be no change to the types 

or amounts of radioactive effluents that 

may be released and, therefore, no 

change in occupational or public 

radiation exposure from the proposed 

action. Moreover, no changes would be 

made to plant buildings or to the site 

property from the proposed action. For 

these reasons, there are no significant 

radiological environmental impacts 

associated with the proposed action. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to the proposed 

action, the NRC staff considered the 

denial of the proposed action (i.e., the 

‘‘no-action’’ alternative). The denial of 

the application would result in no 

change in current environmental 

impacts. Therefore, the environmental 

impacts of the proposed action and the 

alternative action are similar. 

Alternative Use of Resources 

The proposed action does not involve 

the use of any different resources than 

those previously considered in the 

‘‘Generic Environmental Impact 

Statement for License Renewal of 

Nuclear Plants: Regarding Indian Point 

Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, 

Final Report,’’ NUREG–1437, 

Supplement 38, dated December 2010, 

as supplemented in June 2013 and April 

2018. 

Agencies or Persons Consulted 

No additional agencies or persons 

were consulted regarding the 

environmental impact of the proposed 

action. On October 25, 2023, the State 

of New York representative was notified 

of this EA and FONSI. 

State of New York Comments 

By letters dated November 22, 2022, 

and January 6, 2023, the New York State 

Energy Research Development 

Authority, and the New York 

Department of Public Service along with 

the Indian Point Decommissioning 

Oversight Board, respectively submitted 

comments regarding the proposed 

exemptions. Although the comments 

were not specific to this EA, the NRC 

staff reviewed the comments and did 

not identify any information that was 

not previously considered in the 

preparation of this EA. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The licensee has proposed 

exemptions from: (1) certain standards 

in 10 CFR 50.47(b) regarding onsite and 

offsite emergency response plans for 

nuclear power reactors; (2) the 

requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) to 

establish plume exposure and ingestion 

pathway EPZs for nuclear power 

reactors; and (3) certain requirements in 

10 CFR part 50, appendix E, section IV, 

which establishes the elements that 

make up the content of emergency 

plans. The proposed action of granting 

these exemptions would eliminate the 

NRC requirements for the licensee to 

maintain offsite radiological emergency 

plans in accordance with 44 CFR part 

350 and reduce some of the onsite EP 

activities at IPEC, based on the reduced 

risks once the reactor has been 

permanently shut down for a period of 

15 months. However, requirements for 

certain onsite capabilities to 

communicate and coordinate with 

offsite response authorities will be 

retained and offsite EP provisions to 

protect public health and safety will 

still exist through State and local 

government use of a CEMP. 

The NRC is considering issuing the 

exemptions. The proposed action would 

not significantly affect plant safety, 

would not have a significant adverse 

effect on the probability of an accident 

occurring, and would not have any 

significant radiological or 

nonradiological impacts. This FONSI is 

a final finding and incorporates by 

reference the EA in Section II of this 

document. Therefore, the NRC 

concludes that the proposed action will 

not have a significant effect on the 

quality of the human environment. 

Accordingly, the NRC has determined 

not to prepare an environmental impact 

statement for the proposed action. 

IV. Availability of Documents 

The documents identified in the 

following table are available to 

interested persons through one or more 

of the following methods, as indicated. 

Document description ADAMS Accession No./weblink 

Federal Emergency Management Agency, ‘‘Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans,’’ 

Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101, Version 2.0, November 2010.

https://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/20130726-1828-25045- 

0014/cpg_101_comprehensive_

preparedness_guide_developing_

and_maintaining_emergency_operations_plans_2010.pdf. 

Fleming, Jean A., Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, letter to NRC, ‘‘Request for Exemptions 

from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR part 50, appendix E,’’ 

dated December 22, 2021.

ML21356B693. 

Fleming, Jean A., Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, letter to NRC, ‘‘Supplement to Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (HDI) Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR part 50, appendix E for Indian Point Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Including Site-Specific Calculations,’’ dated February 1, 2022.ML22032A017. 

NRC Order on Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Order Approving Transfer of Facility 

Operating Licenses to Holtec International, Owner, and Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Operator, dated November 23, 2020.

ML20297A325. 

Fleming, Jean A., Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, letter to NRC, ‘‘Revision to Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (HDI) Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix E for Indian Point Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3,’’ dated 

February 2, 2022.

ML22033A348. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
74540 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 31, 2023 / Notices 

Document description ADAMS Accession No./weblink 

Fleming, Jean A., Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, letter to NRC, ‘‘Response to Requests for 

Additional Information Related to Exemption Request and License Amendment Request to Revise the 

Facility’s Emergency Plan,’’ dated May 12, 2022.

ML22132A169. 

Vitale, Anthony J., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., letter to NRC, ‘‘Notification of Permanent Cessation of 

Power Operations Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Docket Nos. 50–247 and 50–286, 

License Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64,’’ dated February 8, 2017.

ML17044A004. 

Vitale, Anthony J., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., letter to NRC, ‘‘Certifications of Permanent Cessation 

of Power Operations and Permanent Removal of Fuel from the Reactor Vessel Indian Point Nuclear 

Generating Unit No. 2 NRC, Docket No. 50–247, Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR–26,’’ 

dated May 12, 2020.

ML20133J902. 

Vitale, Anthony J., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., letter to NRC, ‘‘Certifications of Permanent Cessation 

of Power Operations and Permanent Removal of Fuel from the Reactor Vessel Indian Point Nuclear 

Generating Unit No. 3, NRC Docket No. 50–286, Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR–64,’’ 

dated May 11, 2021.

ML21131A157. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), EPA–400/R–17/001, ‘‘PAG Manual: Protective Action Guides 

and Planning Guidance for Radiological Incidents,’’ January 2017.

ML17044A073. 

New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, ‘‘Emergency Planning Exemption Request 

and License Amendment Request for the Indian Point Site,’’ dated November 22, 2022.

ML22332A048. 

New York State Department of Public Service, ‘‘Public Statement Hearing regarding the Exemption Requests and License Amendment Requests for the Indian Point Site,’’ dated January 6, 2023.ML23009B687. 

SECY–22–0102, ‘‘Request by Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC for Exemptions from Certain 

Emergency Planning Requirements for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3,’’ dated 

November 18, 2022.

ML22231A155 (Package). 

Staff Requirements Memorandum to SECY–22–0102, ‘‘Request by Holtec Decommissioning International, 

LLC for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3,’’ dated October 24, 2023.

ML23297A027. 

NUREG–1437, Supplement 38, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear 

Plants: Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Final Report,’’ December 2010.

https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/ 

supplement38/index.html. 

Dated: October 26, 2023. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Shaun M. Anderson, 

Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch, 

Division of Decommissioning, Uranium 

Recovery and Waste Programs, Office of 

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2023–23971 Filed 10–30–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Submission for Review: Renewal of an 

Existing Information Collection, 

(Generic Clearance for Improving 

Customer Experience), OMB Control 

No. 3206–0276. 

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM) offers the general 

public and other Federal agencies the 

opportunity to comment on a previously 

approved information collection request 

(ICR) 3206–0276, (Generic Clearance for 

Improving Customer Experience). 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until January 2, 2024. 

This process is conducted in accordance 

with 5 CFR 1320.1. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments on 

the proposed information collection by 

one of the following means: 

Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://

www.regulations.gov All submissions 

received must include the agency name 

and docket number for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the internet at https://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

• Email michelle.earley@opm.gov. 

Please put ‘‘OPM Customer Experience’’ 

in the subject line of the email. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A 

copy of this information collection 

request, with applicable supporting 

documentation, may be obtained by 

contacting the Human Resources 

Solution, Office of Personnel 

Management, 1900 E Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20415, Attention: 

Michelle Earley, 202–936–2034, or via 

electronic mail to michelle.earley@

opm.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

PRA, (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) Federal 

Agencies must obtain approval from the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for each collection of 

information they conduct or sponsor. 

‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined 

in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 

1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests 

or requirements that members of the 

public submit reports, keep records, or 

provide information to a third party. 

Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA 

requires Federal Agencies to provide a 

60-day notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, including each proposed 

extension of an existing collection of 

information, before submitting the 

collection to OMB for approval. 

A modern, streamlined and 

responsive customer experience means: 

Raising government-wide customer 

experience to the average of the private 

sector service industry; developing 

indicators for high-impact Federal 

programs to monitor progress towards 

excellent customer experience and 

mature digital services; and providing 

the structure (including increasing 

transparency) and resources to ensure 

customer experience is a focal point for 

agency leadership. To support this, 

OMB Circular A–11 Section 280 

established government-wide standards 

for mature customer experience 

organizations in government and 

measurement. To enable Federal 

programs to deliver the experience 

taxpayers deserve, they must undertake 

three general categories of activities: 

Conduct ongoing customer research, 

gather and share customer feedback, and 

test services and digital products. 

These data collection efforts may be 

either qualitative or quantitative in 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1