alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO****RULES 13A-15(E) AND 15D-15(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**I, Robert E. Farr, the Chief Executive Officer of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b. [Reserved];  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuers’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: March 27, 2006/s/ Robert E. Farr Robert E. Farr
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 8, 2018 No. 04
- 18
- 00561
- CV IN RE L.E.A. AND A.G.A., CHILDREN , From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court N o. 2017
- PA
- 02472 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s court
- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant with a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319
- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also In re R.R., No. 04
- 03
- 00096
- CV, 20 03 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). If the appellant desires to request the appellate record, he must file the motion requesting the r ecord within ten days from the date of this order. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within twenty days from the date of this order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a r esponsive brief no later than twenty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of November, 2018 .

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
No. 57561.

#### W. R. Keating & Co., Inc., and Antique Market, Inc., et al. *v*United States,

protests 197767-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, not landed, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, not landed, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
March 31, 1959

No. 62942.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/2817 (B).

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 10, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 1623 Lower Tribunal No. 14

- 31340

________________ 

### Evelyn Martinez, et al. , Appellant s ,
vs. 

### Selene Finance LP , Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez , Judge. Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale) , for appellant s

. Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC and David Rosenberg (Boca Raton) , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J. , and LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 673.3081(1), Fla. Stat. (2022); Bennett v. Deutsche2

Bank Nat. Tr. Co. , 124 So. 3d 320, 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013 ) ( holding that plaintiff bank was entitled to rely on presumption that signature on indorsements was authentic as provided in section 673.3081(1) in absence of evidentiary showing by defendants to support their claim that signature was unauthorized ); accord Selim v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , 2023 WL 5731201, *1, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D1790 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 6, 2023) ; Barsan v. Trinity Fin. Servs

. , LLC , 258 So. 3d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) ; see also G & G In

- Between Bridge Club Corp. v. Palm Plaza Assoc

. , 356 So. 3d 292, 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023) (explaining that under Florida’s “new” summary judgment standard, when plaintiff moves for summary judgment on its

c laims, defendant bears initial burden of showing affirmative defense applies because defendant bears burden of proof on affirmative defense at trial); Chowdhury v. BankUnited, N.A. , 366 So. 3d 1130, 1133 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) ( holding that under “new” summary judgment standard defendant bore burden of showing affirmative defense applied and precluded summary judgment (citing id

. at 299

– 300) ).
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XD477]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The MAFMC will hold a public meeting (webinar) of its 
Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish (MSB) Monitoring Committee. See 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda details.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, November 6, 2023, from 10 
a.m. to 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Webinar connection information will be posted to the MAFMC's 
website calendar prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The main purpose of the meeting is for the 
MSB Monitoring Committee to develop recommendations for future Atlantic 
mackerel specifications. Public comments will also be taken.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 18, 2023.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-23359 Filed 10-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
(Reap. Dec. 10878)

#### California Company et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 7834, etc.

(Decided January 6, 1965)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value of certain seamless steel casing and seamless steel tubing, exported from France, forms tlie subject of the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached to and made part of this decision.

The parties hereto have submitted said appeals for decision upon the following stipulation of fact:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of seamless steel casing and seamless steel tubing, exported from Prance after February 27,1958 and that said merchandise is not on the list of articles from which the action of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 is withheld (T.D. 54521).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing appraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached, for such casing and tubing, less $3.70 per metric ton.

Upon, the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the seamless steel casing and tubing in issue and that said value is as shown on schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & Commercial ePacket contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

# DATES:

Date of notice: October 24, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 16, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & Commercial ePacket Contract 2 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-13 and CP2024-13.                

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,

Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2023-23438 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION


I, William P. Horgan, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of Human
Pheromone Sciences, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's  other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: August 11, 2003

/s/ William P. Horgan
---------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.37

                FIRST AMENDMENT OF GUARANTEED PURCHASE AGREEMENT

         This First Amendment of Guaranteed Purchase Agreement (the "Amendment")
is entered as of the 1st day of February, 2002, by and between NELnet, Inc., a
Nevada Corporation ("NELnet") and Union Bank & Trust Company, in its own right
and as Trustee under any trust established to own or invest in guaranteed
student loans ("Union Bank & Trust").

         WHEREAS, Union Bank & Trust and NELnet entered into that certain
Guaranteed Purchase Agreement dated as of March 19, 2001 ("Agreement"), and the
parties wish to amend that Agreement under the terms specified herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the
mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

         1.       Amendment. "$750,000,000.00" in the second sentence of Section
1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and the following inserted in lieu thereof:
"$1,000,000,000.00".

         2.       Effect of Amendment. This Amendment shall be effective as of
February 1, 2002. Except as expressly amended and modified as set forth above,
all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect,
without modification.

UNION BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, in its own         NELnet, Inc.
right and as Trustee under any trust
established to own or invest in guaranteed
student loans

By:    /s/ Kenneth Backemeyer                    By:    /s/ Terry Heimes
       -----------------------                          -----------------------
Title: Senior Vice President                     Title: CFO
       -----------------------                          -----------------------
No. 65329.

#### B. Altman & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/13404, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 414

Relating to the reestablishment of representative government in Afghanistan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 2000

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. PITTS, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. ROHRABACHER,

Mr. ROYCE, and Mr. BEREUTER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Relating to the reestablishment of representative government

in Afghanistan.

Whereas Afghanistan has existed as a sovereign nation since

1747, maintaining its independence, neutrality, and dignity;

Whereas Afghanistan had maintained its own decisionmaking

through a traditional process called a ‘‘Loya Jirgah’’, or

Grand Assembly, by selecting, respecting, and following

the decisions of their leaders;

Whereas recently warlords, factional leaders, and foreign regimes have laid siege to Afghanistan, leaving the landscape littered with landmines, making the most fundamental activities dangerous;
2

•HCON 414 IH

Whereas in recent years, and especially since the Taliban

came to power in 1996, Afghanistan has become a haven

for terrorist activity, has produced most of the world’s

opium supply, and has become infamous for its human

rights abuses, particularly abuses against women and

children;

Whereas the former King of Afghanistan, Mohammed Zahir

Shah, ruled the country peacefully for 40 years, and after

years in exile retains his popularity and support; and

Whereas former King Mohammed Zahir Shah plans to convene an emergency ‘‘Loya Jirgah’’ to reestablish a stable

government, with no desire to regain power or reestablish

a monarchy, and the Department of State supports such

ongoing efforts: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the United States—

3 (1) supports the right of the people of Afghani4 stan to determine their own destiny through the tra5 ditional Afghan ‘‘Loya Jirgah’’ process; and

6 (2) supports the continuing efforts of former

7 King Mohammed Zahir Shah and other responsible

8 parties searching for peace to convene a Loya

9 Jirgah—

10 (A) to reestablish a representative govern11 ment in Afghanistan through institution build12 ing, increasing the capacity of the people of Af13 ghanistan to govern themselves;

14 (B) to bring stability to Afghanistan; and
3

•HCON 414 IH

1 (C) to end terrorist activities and human

2 rights abuses in Afghanistan.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Greenville Federal
Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 59




---



##### 



Date: September 26, 2007
    /s/ David M. KeplerDavid M. KeplerPresident and Chief Executive Officer 60