alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 103 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 103

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the People's Republic 
                               of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2000

Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Hunter, and Mr. Burton of 
Indiana) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the People's Republic 
                               of China.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress does not approve 
the extension of the authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade 
Act of 1974 recommended by the President to Congress on June 2, 2000, 
with respect to the People's Republic of China.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 126 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 126

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``December 7, 2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 126

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of Giant Industries, Inc. on Form S-4 of our reports dated March 2, 1998,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Giant Industries, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1997, and to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which is part of this
Registration Statement.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
--------------------------------------
Phoenix, Arizona
May 1, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Corporate
Express Consolidated Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  508,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,244
<INVENTORY>                                    191,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               821,122
<PP&E>                                         391,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,840,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          435,177
<BONDS>                                        617,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                     703,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,840,090
<SALES>                                        913,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               913,342
<CGS>                                          699,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,787
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,710
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAQUAN HAMILTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 695 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3
 
             [LETTERHEAD OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION]
 
Board of Directors
Allied Waste Industries, Inc.
15880 North Greenway -- Hayden Loop
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
 
Members of the Board:
 
     We hereby consent to the inclusion of our opinion letter to the Board of
Directors of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. ("Allied Waste") as Appendix C to the
Joint Proxy Statement and Prospectus of Allied Waste and American Disposal
Services, Inc. ("American Disposal") relating to the proposed merger transaction
involving Allied Waste and American Disposal. In giving such consent, we do not
admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required
under, and we do not admit that we are "experts" for purposes of, the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
 
                                       By:
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION
 
New York, New York
August 28, 1998
EXHIBIT 4.3


 


CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST


OF


SVB CAPITAL II


 


 


THIS Certificate of Trust of
SVB CAPITAL II (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware
Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. §3801 et seq.)
(the “Act”).


 


1.             Name.  The
name of the statutory trust formed hereby is SVB CAPITAL II.


 


2.             Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the
State of Delaware is 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890.


 


3.             Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon filing.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with
Section 3811(a) of the Act.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Wilmington Trust Company,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Kathleen A. Pendelini

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Kathleen A.
  Pendelini

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Financial Services
  Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Lauren Friedman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Lauren Friedman,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Administrative Trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Paulette Mehas

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Paulette Mehas,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Administrative Trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Donal D. Delaney

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Donal D. Delaney,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  as Administrative Trustee
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 38

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 repealing the twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

   Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
 Berman, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Sabo, and Mr. Pallone) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 repealing the twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the 
United States is hereby repealed.''.
                                 <all>
```
# EPA-Approved State ofTennessee Safe DrinkingWaterAct §1422 Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Statutes andRegulations for Well Classes I,II,III,IV, andV

Volume 1 September2013

## Table ofContents

I. Tennessee CodeAnnotated, Title 4, Chapter 5, Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (August 5, 2011) II. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 221, Part4, Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems (August 5, 2011) III. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 221, Part7, Tennessee Safe DrinkingWaterAct of 1983 (July 9, 2012) IV. Tennessee CodeAnnota ted, Title 68, Chapter 212, Section 101 

### etseq., HazardousWaste ManagementAct of 1977 (July 9, 2012) V. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 212, Section 201 

### etseq., Hazardous Waste ManagementActof1983 (July 9, 2012) VI. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 203, Tennessee Environmental ProtectionFund (May 10, 2012) VII. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter211, Part 1, Tennessee Solid Waste DisposalAct (June 25, 2009) VIII. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 215, Part 1, Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Act (June 29, 2009)IX. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 69, Chapter 3, Part 1, Water Quality Con trol Act (October 1, 2012) X. Official Compilation Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee, Chapter 0400-45-06, Underground Injection Control (December 1 1, 2012) XI. Official Compilation Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee, Chapter 0400 - 45 - 01, Public Water Systems (December 11, 2012) XII. Officia l Compilation Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee, Chapter 1200-1 -6, Regulati ons to Govern Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems (November 24, 2009) XIII. Official Compilation Rul es & Regulations of th e Sta te of Tennessee, Chapter 0400-12 - .02(1 )(c), Hazardous Waste Management (September 20, 2012) XIV . Official Compilation Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee, Chapter 0400-20-05-.161, Standards for Protec t ion Against Radiation (May 22, 20 12)
No. 67256.

protests 62/1111, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Kanematsu New York, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, G.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wide-angle and telephoto lenses similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Unimark Photo, Inc.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 75, C.D. 2283), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
In The.Matter Of: 

## SERVED OCTOBER 31, 2012
U.S.DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2012-0779**DANI~L** JOHNATHAN STERLING ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2011-EA-030050 Respondent



### ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING ZuiZ 

## -2 p 

## 2:**1.~0.**

On October 12, 2012, the Respondent, Daniel Johnathan Sterling, by and through his representative, Janet Marks Long, submitted a one-page letter to the Federal Aviation Administration Regional Counsel ("FAA") and the Hearing Docket Clerk stating that he was withdrawing his Request for Hearing to the Complaint issued herein by the FAA. The Respondent's Letter ofWithdrawal stated that the parties had reacheda settlement. On October 26,2012, the FAA submitted to the Office ofHearings a copy ofthe Respondent's Letter ofWithdrawal accompanied by a one-page letter confirming settlement of the matter and requesting the matterbe removed from the Docket. There is a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference setin thismatter, but a**Hearin~** has not been scheduled. It

### Is Hereby Ordered: 1) The November 

### 1, 2012, deadline for the parties to file theirjoint scheduling/discovery plan is cancelled. 2) The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, setfor November 8, 2012 (I

### O:OOam EST), is cancelled

.. 3) Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. §13.215, the Respondent, Daniel Johnathan Sterling, has withdrawn hisRequest for Hearing because the parties have settled the dispute, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: ServiceList '

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591
· Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### Daniel Johnathan Sterling, Respondent 

### 140 Jamison Lane Monroeville, PA 15146 TEL: 909-732-1332 

### ONE COPY

Leonid Talisman, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3403 FAX: 718-995-5699 The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536- FDMS No. FAA-20\2-0779 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following. address: F.ederal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
No. 61684.

#### Railway Express Agency, Inc., a/c A. J. Gavrin Press, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 307919-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. P68/89.

protest 62/16073 (New York).

#### Bar Zel Expediters *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of shoivcase locks in chief value of brass, steel, or iron; that following the principle of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), said locks are not locks of cylinder or pin tumbler construction; and that said locks are not cabinet locks or padlocks, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James B. Hawkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. HawkinsPrint Name: James B. HawkinsTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2007


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven J. Murphy, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Steven J. MurphyPrint Name: Steven J. MurphyTitle: Vice President Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 9, 2007
No. 66173.

#### Jack Kemp et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/25253, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

IN RE URVE MAGGITTI, : No. 22 MM 2024 

Petitioner 

V. 

DEBRA TODD, CHRISTINE DONOHUE, 

KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, DAVID N. 

WECHT, SALLIE UPDYKE MUNDY, P. 

KEVIN BROBSON, AMY DREIBELBIS, 

Respondents 

ORDER

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the " Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus" is DENIED. 

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 85

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
  should be reformed by April 15, 2002, in a manner that protects the 
Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, that is revenue neutral, and 
         that results in a fair and less complicated tax code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1999

  Mr. Boyd (for himself, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Etheridge, Mr. Tanner, Mr. 
Minge, and Mrs. Thurman) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
  should be reformed by April 15, 2002, in a manner that protects the 
Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, that is revenue neutral, and 
         that results in a fair and less complicated tax code.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is too complicated 
        for the average citizen to understand;
            (2) honest taxpayers spend millions of dollars and 
        countless hours completing tax forms; and
            (3) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is riddled with 
        loopholes that benefit special interests at the expense of 
        other taxpayers.

SEC. 2. REFORM OF TAX CODE.

    (a) Deadline.--It is the sense of the Congress that the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 should be reformed not later than April 15, 2002.
    (b) Guidelines.--In developing a new tax code, the following 
guidelines should be used:
            (1) Reform of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 must ensure 
        adequate funding of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance 
        Trust Fund, the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and 
        the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund for current 
        recipients and future retirees.
            (2) Such reform must result in a tax code that is revenue 
        neutral. No changes should be made that would result in deficit 
        spending.
            (3) Such reform must result in a tax code that is fair. All 
        Americans should be treated fairly under a new tax code.
            (4) Such reform should promote economic growth by 
        encouraging savings and investment.
            (5) Such reform must result in a tax code that is less 
        complicated. It should take less time for the average American 
        to complete his tax return under a new tax code than is 
        required under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ALBERT E. CUNEO,

Petitioner

v.

FINANCIAL DIMENSIONS, INC.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 42 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 67693.

#### Moscahlades Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/9388 and 62/15913 (Los Angeles).

*292Opinion by

Johnson-, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe proper basis for converting tbe weight in pounds to gallons is 6.5 pounds per gallon, tbe collector was directed to reliquidate tbe entries accordingly.
Before the Third Division,

July 13, 1951

No. 55762.

protest 42176-K/12215 (New Orleans).

#### Olavarria & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Eicwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 60693.

#### Asche Bandor Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 263209-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that an allowance was made for gelatinous substance on certain canned hams and similar pork products equal to 10 percent of the contents of the tins, whereas there should have been an allowance of 20 percent, and that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 60346. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the merchandise was held dutiable at 3)4 cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the tins, less an allowance for gelatinous substance equal to 20 percent of the contents of each tin.