alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022148EN.01002201.xml

| 31.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 148/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 148/22

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/842

of 24 May 2022

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Abadía Retuerta’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Abadía Retuerta’ forwarded by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Abadía Retuerta’ forwarded by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Abadía Retuerta’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Abadía Retuerta’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Abadía Retuerta’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 May 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 505, 15.12.2021, p. 8.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDAPHIS CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               455,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               493,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (45,909)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (11,039)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (34,870)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Democratic governance and therule of law: lessons from Colombia**
 
PDFMobiePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146/17-2:D 39
Item Number:0307-A-66 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000656290
 
January 8, 2020
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFTHE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. §1350

I, Elizabeth Schroeder,the Chief Financial Officer of Tuesday Morning Corporation, hereby certifythat:

1.                                            Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tuesday Morning Corporation for theperiod ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TuesdayMorning Corporation.
| Date: November 2, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Elizabeth Schroeder                      |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Elizabeth Schroeder  Chief Financial Officer |

 

23

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Li3 Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luis Saenz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Luis SaenzName:
Luis SaenzTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
December 1, 2011
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-505

_____________________________

BRANDON ARNOLD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

September 17, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2014

s1217 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2014

150206

JENNY N. GLAUBIUS, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150206 COA: 318750 Macomb CC Family Division: 2012

- 004307

- DM JOHN A. GLAUBIUS, Defendant

- Appellant. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and i t is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the defendant was merely the “presumed father” of the minor child, see MCL 722.1433(4), or whether he was the “affiliated father,” see MCL 722.1433(2), due to certain asp ects of the parties’ divorce judgment

– provisions that “t[ook] as confessed” the complaint allegation that the parties had had one child, that referred to the parties as mother and father, and that provided for child custody and visitation; (2) whether th e plaintiff lacked a remedy under the Revocation of Paternity Act, MCL 722.1431 et seq ., for the reason that the divorce judgment precluded her effort to obtain a determination under MCL 722.1441(1)(a) that the minor child was born out of wedlock; and (3) whether the alleged paternity determination in the judgment of divorce was res judicata as to the question of the identity of the child’s legal father.

The Children’s Law and Family Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan and the University of Michigan Law School Child Welfare Appellate Clinic are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus

curiae.

V IVIANO

, J

., not participating due to a familial relationship with the presiding circuit court judge in this case.
Before the Second Division,

June 27, 1950

No. 54485.

#### Alltransport, Incorporated *v.*United States,

protest 154074-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133555 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 133555 COA: 263169 Kent CC: 04-000258-FH, GORDON MICHAEL ZIEGLER, 04-000605-FH, 04-000606-FH, Defendant-Appellant. 04-000764-FH

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
(function ($, once) {
  Drupal.behaviors.backtotop = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {

      /**
       * Hide show back to top links.
       */
      function backToTop() {
        if ($(window).scrollTop() > settings.back_to_top.back_to_top_button_trigger) {
          $('#backtotop').fadeIn();
        } else {
          $('#backtotop').fadeOut();
        }
      }

      var exist = $('#backtotop').length;
      if (exist == 0) {
        once('backtotops', "body", context).forEach(function(thing){
          $(thing).append("<button id='backtotop'>" + settings.back_to_top.back_to_top_button_text + "</button>");
        })
      }

      backToTop();
      $(window).scroll(function () {
        backToTop();
      });

      once('backtotop', '#backtotop', context).forEach(function(thing){
        $(thing).click(function () {
          $("html, body").bind("scroll mousedown DOMMouseScroll mousewheel keyup", function () {
            $('html, body').stop();
          });
          $('html,body').animate({scrollTop: 0}, 0, function () {
            $("html, body").unbind("scroll mousedown DOMMouseScroll mousewheel keyup");
          });
          return false;
        });
      })
    }
  };
})(jQuery, once);
ICYMI -- FEMA Administrator Calls for

Collaboration in Building a Resilient

Nation at National Emergency

Management Association Conference

Release Date: March 18, 2024

WASHINGTON – Yesterday, FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell addressed the

nation’s emergency managers at the National Emergency Management

Association (NEMA)’s 2024 Mid-Year Forum in Washington, D.C. In her speech,

she celebrated NEMA’s 50th anniversary and the long-standing partnership

between the emergency management organizations. As the role of emergency

managers continues to shift to meet changing needs of the nation, Administrator

Criswell called for resilience-focused collaboration to find ways to “equitably

deliver our resources to communities before they need them.”

From the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979 to the COVID-19 pandemic, the

field of emergency management has evolved through the decades. Emergency

managers are called upon to respond to more and more incidents and a variety of

natural and man-made hazards. The profession is no longer expected to just pick

up the pieces; emergency mangers are expected to be there before, during and

after disaster strikes. 

“You, the state emergency managers are on the frontline!” said Administrator

Criswell. “If we’re going to prepare our communities for a future driven by climate

change, then we need to invest in hazard mitigation before a disaster even strikes.

This is our “Year of Resilience.” And we want to be your partners in this critical

work, because you are the backbone of emergency management. As state

directors, you know your communities best -- you’re ready to do what it takes to

keep people safe.” 

Communities across the nation have been, and continue to be, tested by natural

hazards and adversaries looking to do harm. Amidst these challenges, there are

stories of how thoughtful planning helped a family, a neighborhood or a

Page 1 of 2

Page printed at fema.gov/press-release/20240318/icymi-fema-administrator-callscollaboration-building-resilient-nation04/15/2024
community. Administrator Criswell underscored the critical importance of fostering

robust partnerships to leverage resources, share best practices and break down

barriers in order to enhance resilience and safeguard communities nationwide. 

Read Administrator Criswell’s full speech at Administrator Criswell's Remarks at

the National Emergency Management Association 2024 Mid-Year Forum.

Page 2 of 2

Page printed at fema.gov/press-release/20240318/icymi-fema-administrator-callscollaboration-building-resilient-nation04/15/2024
Case No. 7,742.

#### KETLAND v. BISSETT.

[1 Wash. C. C. 144.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. Term, 1804.

Practice at Law — Depositions—Incomplete Ans w bus — Gen eral Interrogatory.

1. The character of the defendant not being impeached, evidence to support it cannot be admitted.

[Cited in Fahey v. Crotty, 03 Mich. 388, 29 N. W. 878.]

2. It seems that depositions sworn to, but not signed by the -witness, may be read in evidence.

3. Each interrogatory in a commission should be answered separately, at least in substance; and the omission of such answers is fatal to the whole commission; although the witness in answering the general interrogatory, says that he knows nothing further material to either party.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS of Hon. Bushrod Washington. Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters. Jr., Esq.]

The plaintiff directed defendant to ship for him good Madeira wine, for the Bombay market; he shipped the wine, and the only question was, whether he had shipped such wine as was directed; the plaintiff alleging that it was unsound, would not sell at Bombay, and was necessarily carried to Calcutta, whore it was sold for one hundred rupees less, than a cargo of indifferent wine, carried to Bombay, at the same time, was sold for.

'•On the trial, tthe following points of evidence were decided: (1) That the defendant’s character not being impeached, evidence by the defendant to support his character was improper. (2) Depositions were offered, and objected to, because not signed by the witnesses. Evidence being given that the opposite counsel had waived the objection, WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice, admitted the depositions, and observed, that he was inclined to think, that without the waiver, the objection was not good, but gave no opinion. (3) The depositions are in answer to interrogatories, but many of them are not answered or noticed. The answer to the general interrogatory, is in the usual way, that the witness knows nothing farther, &c. The whole commission was objected to, for this reason. THE COURT thought the objection good; each *interrogatory*should be answered, at least in substance, and not to have examined the witnesses to each, is fatal to the whole commission.
Before the Third Division,

January 20, 1949

No. 52834.

#### Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58624-K, etc. (New York).

*228Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         170,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,332
<PP&E>                                          36,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 343,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     289,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   343,120
<SALES>                                        105,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,375
<CGS>                                           62,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,269)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,177
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# -~ 

# nRCIES ftonr concept to connpleNon
U.S. Depat`tment of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
May 27, 2015
Re: Amendment to Exemption 11147A issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory DocketNo. FAA-2014- 10 10.

Dear Sir or Madam; enrGies Inc. currently holds Exemptions ntunbered 11147 and 11147A (hereinafter the Exemption) issued for the purpose of performing Aerial Data Collection. enrGies Inc. herby requests an amendment to that Exemption to include additional small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the Exemption to support client requests (public interest). The requested systems (under the same terms and conditions contained in the original Exemption) are cited below. 1. Parrot, sense Fly — eBee; 2. Aeryon Labs — SkyRanger and Scout; 3. AIBOTIX — X6; 4. Physical Sciences Inc., Tactical Robotics — InstantEye; 5. DJI—Phantom3, S800, S900 and S1000 All of the requested sUAS have been previously approved tluough the 333 exemption process for other organizations and manuals are on file. enrGies Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) and other technical documentation was provided in our initial request. enrGies states that no conditions or limitations from our original request have changed and all operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. As this is an amendment to our existing exemption, enrGies Inc. respectfally submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. Please contact Mr. Philip Owen, Director of UAS Operations @ 256-759-0181, philowen@enrgies.com or Jeff Lemasters, Director of Business Development @ 850-581-4422 jefflemasters@enrgies.com should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption.



# ~ ~
L. terc President enrGies Inc. 256-357-5519

cc: Robert Pappas Thuy Cooper Dan Ngo Phil Owen Jeff Lemasters

7220 Governors West, Huntsville, AL. 35806, www.enrgies.com