alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 371 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 371

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2000

 Received; referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideas of National Alcohol and Drug Recovery 
                                 Month.

Whereas 26 million Americans currently suffer the ravages of drug or alcohol 
        addiction;
Whereas 85 percent of all crimes are tied to drug or alcohol addiction;
Whereas American taxpayers incurred more than $150 billion in drug-related 
        criminal and medical costs in 1997 alone--more than they spent on 
        education, transpor-

tation, agriculture, energy, space, and foreign aid combined;

Whereas every dollar invested in drug and alcohol treatment yields seven dollars 
        in savings in health care costs, criminal justice costs, and lost 
        productivity costs from job absenteeism, injuries, and subpar work 
        performance;
Whereas treatment for addiction is as effective as treatments for other chronic 
        medical conditions, such as diabetes and high blood pressure;
Whereas adolescents who undergo addiction treatment report less use of 
        marijuana, less heavy drinking, and less criminal involvement;
Whereas other benefits of adolescent addiction treatment include better 
        psychological adjustment and improved school performance after 
        treatment;
Whereas a number of organizations and individuals dedicated to fighting 
        addiction and promoting treatment and recovery will recognize September 
        2000 as National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month;
Whereas National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month celebrates the 
        tremendous strides taken by individuals who have undergone successful 
        treatment and recognizes those in the treatment field who have dedicated 
        their lives to helping people recover from addiction; and
Whereas the 2000 national campaign focuses on supporting adolescents in 
        addiction treatment and recovery, embraces the theme of ``Recovering Our 
        Future: One Youth at a Time'', and seeks to increase awareness about 
        alcohol and drug addiction and to promote treatment and recovery for 
        adolescents and adults: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress supports the goals and ideas of National Alcohol and 
Drug Recovery Month.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
January 13, 1949

No. 52822.

#### European Type Founders, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 51635-K, etc.

Abstract 52745. (Initial No. 95216-K.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
No. 63965.

protests 323304-K and 325362-K (New York).

#### J. J. Sales Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 57866.

protest 175784-K (Ogdensburg).

#### John N. Chilton *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report Fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results      of operations of the Company. |

| Dated: | July 29, 2008 | By:*/s/ Scott D. Allen*            |
|--------|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |          | Scott D. Allen                                                                            |
|   |          | Chief Financial Officer                                                                   |
NO. 12-15-00037-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A. B.,

A CHILD 

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 402ND 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). 

Appellant perfected her appeal on February 12, 2015. Because this is a parental rights 

termination case, we notified Appellant on February 13, 2015, that her brief would be due on 

March 16, 2015. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a) (requiring disposition of appeal in termination 

case within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed). 

When Appellant failed to file her brief by the due date, this court notified Appellant on 

March 23, 2015, that the brief was past due. The notice warned that if no motion for extension of 

time to file the brief was received by April 2, 2015, the appeal could be dismissed for want of 

prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1). Further, the notice informed 

Appellant that the motion for extension of time must contain a reasonable explanation for her 

failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury thereby. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On April 2, 2015, Appellant filed a motion requesting that the time for filing her brief be 

extended to April 23, 2015. The court granted the motion on April 8, 2015. The court’s order 

included a notice to Appellant that no further requests for extension would be entertained by the 

court. Appellant was further warned that failure to file the brief by the extended deadline could 

result in this case being referred to the court for dismissal. The deadline for filing the brief has 

passed, and Appellant has not filed her brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of 
2

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Opinion delivered April 30, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 30, 2015

NO. 12-15-00037-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A. B., A CHILD

Appeal from the 402nd District Court 

of Wood County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2014-096)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Before the First Division,

October 9, 1958

No. 62358.

#### E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 287546-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS EXHIBIT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS
EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE
SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY
OTHER FILING WHICH INCORPORATES THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE, UNLESS SUCH OTHER
FILING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          45,760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,245
<INVENTORY>                                     34,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,146
<PP&E>                                          70,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,442
<BONDS>                                        110,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,598
<SALES>                                        150,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,493
<CGS>                                           94,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,045
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
        

</TABLE>
No. 65314.

#### The May Dept. Stores Co., Inc. (Kaufmann Div.), et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/22391, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

March 12, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00005

- CV

IN RE ESTATE OF JACK HIROMI IKENAGA , Sr., Deceased,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011

- PC

- 4330 Honora ble Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

T he reporter’s r ecord was due to be filed with this court on February 3 , 201 5

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1. On February 4 , 201 5 , this court granted court reporter Cheryl Hester ’s request for an extension of time to file the record until March 6, 2015 , f or a n extension of thirty

- one days.

On the due date, court reporter Cheryl Hester filed a second request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record until March 1 3 , 201 5

. The request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record m ust be filed with this cou rt by March 1 3 , 201 5

. See id. R. 35.3(c).
If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by March 1 3 , 201 5

, any requests for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, proofread, and formatte d into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the requested date. A preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached to this order.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 367/27 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 367 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6027 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 367

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6027 October 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 367/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2017(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2017/C 367/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2017(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 367/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2017(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2017/C 367/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2017(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

11

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Before the Second Division,

September 24, 1958

No. 62346.

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 309376-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of key-driven calculating machines the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 160, C. A. D. 655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Stacy M. Hodges, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date:September 2, 2011 |  |  |  | /S/ Stacy M. Hodges                    
|                       |  |  |  | Stacy M. Hodges Chief
Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q/A pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q/A for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
A89A0767.

#### THORNE v. PADGETT.

(392 SE2d 576)

Decided February 5, 1990.

*Lillian Moy, Vicky O. Kimbrell,*for appellant.

*Bips & Bips, R. Andrew Bips,*for appellee.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case having béen reversed by the Supreme Court, *Thorne v. Padgett,*259 Ga. 650 (386 SE2d 155) (1989), our decision in *Thorne v. Padgett,*191 Ga. App. 814 (383 SE2d 160) (1989), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
720 S. Colorado Blvd

Penthouse North

Denver, CO 80246

Tel: +1 (334) 578 2900

Fax: +1 (334) 460 8111

www.unmannedexperts.com

E-Mail: operations@unmannedexperts.com

September 24, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. 12075

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1370

Petitioner:

Unmanned Experts, Inc.

Drew A. Jurkofsky, CKO

720 S. Colorado Blvd, PH North

Denver, CO 80246

Cell: 970-237-1902

Email: drew.j@unmannedexperts.com

Website: www.unmannedexperts.com

Dear Sir or Madam,

By letter from the FAA dated July 17, 2015, an exemption was granted to Unmanned Experts for relief under 

Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 12075 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1370.

This application is substantially based on the FAA’s findings in Exemption No. 11194 (FAA-2014-0910), 

Exemption No. 11287 (FAA-2014-0950), Exemption No. 11306A (FAA-2014-1023), Exemption No. 12284 (FAA2015-2127) and Exemption No. 12407 (FAA-2015-0994), and in reliance on the analysis provided therein.

Unmanned Experts hereby requests that the exemption so granted, be now amended to include:

1. ING Responder

2. ING Serenity

3. Mikado Logo 800

4. MULTIROTOR G4 Blackbird

5. MULTIROTOR G4 Eagle

6. MULTIROTOR G4 Recon One

7. MULTIROTOR G4 Skycrane
Exemptions / Rule Making

Unmanned Experts PROPRIETARY Page 2 of 2

8. MULTIROTOR G4 Surveying-Robot

9. senseFly eBee

10. senseFly eXom

11. Yuneec Typhoon Q500+

Attached are the Aircraft Flight Manuals and specifications for these aircraft. They contain the following:

• General Information

• Operating Limitations

• Normal Procedures

• Emergency Procedures

• Aircraft and Systems Description

• Handling, Service and Maintenance Procedures

The findings, rationale, conclusions and conditions contained in the FAA’s Exemption No. 12075 apply to this 

application to include the ING Responder, ING Serenity, Mikado Logo 800, MULTIROTOR G4 Blackbird, 

MULTIROTOR G4 Eagle, MULTIROTOR G4 Recon One, MULTIROTOR G4 Skycrane, MULTIROTOR G4 SurveyingRobot, senseFly eBee, senseFly eXom and Yuneec Typhoon Q500+ in Exemption No. 12075.

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information 

that is required.

Very Respectfully,

Drew A. Jurkofsky

Chief Knowledge Officer

Unmanned Experts, Inc.
-                      -                        -  关于我们 
                      - 新闻与多媒体
                      -  新闻与多媒体 
                      -  博客 
                      -  活动 
                      -  事实简介 
                      -  FEMA直播 
                      -  移动端产品 
                      -  新闻通讯 
                      -  新闻发布 
                      -  播客 
                      -  社交媒体 
                      -  关于我们 
                      -  报告与数据 
                      -  FEMA在行动 

          This page has not been translated into 简体中文. Visit the 简体中文 page for resources in that language.        

# Blog

                            - English 
                            - Español 

FEMA.gov 网站新面貌
我们很高兴与大家分享 FEMA.gov 主页的新面貌,新网站突出了全国社区每天所做的重要工作,提高灾后恢复力并帮助受灾害影响的人们。
一月 18, 2024

在灾难恢复过程中需要帮助?请访问 Disaster Recovery Center (灾难恢复中心)
灾难过后,您可能会感到不知所措,不知道如何继续工作和生活。恢复之路可能令人生畏,但您并非孤身作战。在恢复过程中,请务必寻求帮助。灾难恢复中心(DRC)是您获得直接帮助的最佳选择。
十月 8, 2022

FEMA 继续在全国各地开展救援工作
从 Alaska 到 Puerto Rico,从 Florida 到 South Carolina,全国数以百万计的美国人受到灾难的影响。FEMA 的工作没有放缓,继续开展救援工作并为灾难幸存者提供帮助。
十月 3, 2022

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

In an effort to keep FEMA.gov current, please see the content archive for information prior to January 20, 2021.

返回顶部
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMultigrid method for nearly singular and slightly indefinite problemsThis paper deals with nearly singular, possibly indefinite problems for which the usual multigrid solvers converge very slowly or even diverge. The main difficulty is related to some badly approximated smooth functions which correspond to eigenfunctions with nearly zero eigenvalues. A correction to the usual coarse-grid equations is derived, both in the correction scheme and in the full approximation scheme. The performance of the new algorithm using this correction is essentially as that of usual multigrid for definite problems.Document ID19860009521Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsBrandt, A.*(Weizmann Inst. of Science Rehovot, Israel)*Taasan, S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1985Subject CategoryMathematical And Computer Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberICASE-85-57NASA-CR-178026NAS 1.26:178026Accession Number86N18991Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17070CONTRACT_GRANT: AF-AFOSR-84-0070CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18107PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-83-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860009521.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024