alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

89–011 2009

111th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 111–77 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO IRAN 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT 

TO IRAN ORIGINALLY DECLARED ON NOVEMBER 14, 1979, BY 

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12170, IS TO CONTINUE IN EFFECT BEYOND 

NOVEMBER 14, 2009, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d) 

NOVEMBER 19, 2009.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 12, 2009. 

Hon. NANCY PELOSI, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MADAM SPEAKER: Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary 

date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for 

publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency 

with respect to Iran that was declared in Executive Order 12170 

of November 14, 1979, is to continue in effect beyond November 14, 

2009. 

Our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the 

process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements with 

Iran is still underway. For these reasons, I have determined that 

it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, with respect to Iran, beyond November 14, 2009. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTS

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTS
(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

IRAN

On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President 

declared a national emergency with respect to Iran, pursuant to 

the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 

1701–1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to 

the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 

States constituted by the situation in Iran. Because our relations 

with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements with Iran is still underway, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, 

must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2009. Therefore, consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year this national emergency 

with respect to Iran. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 12, 2009. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTS
Before the First Division,

July 17, 1947

No. 51846.

#### E. H. Corrigan *v.*United States,

protests 110830-K, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial it was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Corrigan*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 952). Upon the record made and following the cited decision, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1803 was sustained.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 78

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 10, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting
2

HJ 78 RDS

1 ‘‘November 17, 1999’’, and by striking ‘‘$288,903,248’’

2 in section 119 and inserting ‘‘$346,483,754’’. Public Law

3 106–46 is amended by striking ‘‘November 10, 1999’’ and

4 inserting ‘‘November 17, 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Order issued September 20, 2012 

In The 

Tourt of Apprais 

Niftll Bistrirt of . .exas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-00695-CV 

MARK MCGOWAN AlND BEVERLY KIRKPATRICK MCGOWAN, Appellants 

V. 

MEADOWWOOD PARK RANCH ESTATES 

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee 

ORDER 

Appellants' September 18, 2012 motion to extend the time for filing a motion for rehearing 

is GRANTED. Appellants' motion for rehearing, received on September 18, 2012 is ORDERED 

filed as of the date of this order. 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16


                      AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 12, 2000
                     TO THE 1989 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN OF
                             U.S. TRUST CORPORATION

     The 1989 Stock Compensation Plan of U.S. Trust Corporation (the "1989
Plan") is amended effective January 12, 2000 as follows:

     1.   Section 3.6 is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the
          end of the Section to read as follows:

          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the effective time of the merger of
          Patriot Merger Corporation ("Merger Sub") with and into the
          Corporation (the "Merger") pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger
          dated as of January 12, 2000, by and among The Charles Schwab
          Corporation ("Schwab"), Merger Sub and the Corporation (the "Merger
          Agreement"), payment with respect to Restricted Common Shares shall be
          made to participants in the form of a single payment of Schwab's
          common stock equivalent in value to the single lump sum cash payment
          that would otherwise be required to be made hereunder upon a Change in
          Control, as determined in accordance with the procedures set forth in
          Section 1.7 of the Merger Agreement."

     2.   Section 4.7 of the 1989 Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
          paragraph at the end thereof:

          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the effective time of the Merger,
          payment with respect to each Participant's Account and each
          participant's Award for any Open Cycle shall be made to such
          Participant in the form of a single payment of Schwab's common stock
          equivalent in value to the single lump sum cash payment that would
          otherwise be required to be made hereunder upon a Change in Control,
          as determined in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section
          1.7 of the Merger Agreement."

     3.   Section 5.4 of the 1989 Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
          sentence at the end thereof:

          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the effective time of the Merger,
          payment with respect to each Participant's Benefit Equalization Units
          shall be made to such participant in the form of a single payment of
          Schwab's common stock equivalent in value to the single lump sum cash
          payment that would otherwise be required to be made hereunder upon a
          Change in Control, as determined in accordance with the procedures set
          forth in Section 1.7 of the Merger Agreement."
Before Judge Beckworth,

July 3, 1967

No. R67/84.

No. R67/85.

#### Dana Parfumes Corp. *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/12405, etc. (New York). Dana Parfumes Corp. et al. *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/14208, etc. (New York).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Gehrig Hoban & C*o., *Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 727, A.R.D. 210), the court found and held that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the respective values of the “Canoe” and/or “Bon Voyage” perfume involved herein and that such values are the respective values listed in schedule “B,” said schedule “B” being attached to and made a part of the decisions.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 21.01

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              JURISDICTION OF
NAME                           INCORPORATION       ALSO DOES BUSINESS AS
----                           -------------       ---------------------
<S>                           <C>                 <C>
Subsidiaries of Registrant:

CSK Auto, Inc..............      Arizona          Checker Auto Parts,
                                                  Kragen Auto Parts,
                                                  Schuck's Auto Supply
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                       INTEGRATED PROCESS EQUIPMENT CORP.
               COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                   --------------------------------------------
                                                       1996            1997            1998
                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
Net loss.........................................  $(10,657,000)   $(33,746,000)   $(42,259,000)
Cumulative dividend on preferred stock...........      (579,000)       (284,000)       (244,000)
                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS.....  $(11,236,000)   $(34,030,000)   $(42,503,000)
                                                   ============    ============    ============
Shares:
Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding (including options and warrants
  exercised from beginning of the year)..........    14,434,000      15,623,000      17,603,000
Number of shares obtainable from exercise of
  outstanding options and warrants...............            --              --              --
Number of shares assumed to be purchased with the
  proceeds from exercise of options and warrants
  (using the average market price during the
  year)..........................................            --              --              --
                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
Shares used in per share calculation.............    14,434,000      15,623,000      17,603,000
                                                   ============    ============    ============
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE........................  $      (0.78)   $      (2.18)   $      (2.41)
                                                   ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 26

Providing for the reappointment of Barber B. Conable, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Regula) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Barber B. Conable, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Barber B. Conable, Jr. of New 
York on April 11, 1999, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent 
for a term of six years, effective April 12, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 343

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of families

eating together.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2000

Mr. RANGEL (for himself and Mr. MCCOLLUM) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education

and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

importance of families eating together.

Whereas the use and abuse of illegal drugs, nicotine, and alcohol are the greatest threat to the health and well-being

of American children;

Whereas parental influence is one of the most crucial factors

in determining the likelihood of teenage substance abuse;

Whereas family dinners have long been a pillar of American

family life;

Whereas the correlation between the frequency of family dinners and the risk of substance abuse is well documented;

Whereas surveys conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University have
2

•HCON 343 IH

found, for each of the past 4 years, that children and

teenagers who routinely eat dinner with their families are

far less likely to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;

Whereas, according to these surveys, teenagers from families

that seldom eat dinner together are 72 percent more likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol, and teenagers from families that eat

dinner together are 31 percent less likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;

Whereas one method for families to eat dinner together more

often would be for them to select a recurring occasion for

doing so, such as the third Monday of each month; and

Whereas a National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-Children Day on

Monday, June 19, 2000, would encourage families to eat

together: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) eating dinner together is a critical step for

4 a family in raising healthy, drug-free children; and

5 (2) a National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-Children

6 Day should be established in order to encourage

7 families to eat together as often as possible.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8453

EDDIE MOORE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RUDOLPH TILLMAN, in his individual capacity; JANICE MONTGOMERY, in her individual capacity; WILLIAM WHITE, in his individual capacity; DONALD DRISKILL, in his individual capacity; DENISE HINSON, in her individual capacity; GLENN S. SHERMAN, in his individual capacity; CHARLES YATES, in his individual capacity; GLENDA ROBINSON, in her individual capacity; MARSHALL CLEMENT SANFORD, JR., in his individual capacity; ROBERT M. STEVENSON, in his individual and official capacity; JON OZMINT, in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(3:07-cv-03209-RBH)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Barnwell McMaster, John Gregg McMaster, Jr., TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, SouthCarolina; David Michael Tatarsky, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

Eddie Moore appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore

v. Tillman , No. 3:07-cv-03209-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2008;

Sept. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 51232.

#### Protests 86836-K, etc., of Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) *2}i*percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli v. United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



/s/    J. NICK
RIEHLEJ. Nick Riehle Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer


March 8, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 74227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23822]



[[Page 74227]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18075 and #18076; Illinois Disaster Number IL-
00086]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Illinois

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of ILLINOIS (FEMA-4728-DR), dated 08/15/
2023.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/29/2023 through 07/02/2023.

DATES: Issued on 10/13/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/30/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/15/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Illinois, dated 08/15/2023, is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 10/30/2023.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-23822 Filed 10-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-31187

Summary Calendar

LEROY HUBERT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF BATON ROUGE / PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

No. 3:08-CV-515

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Leroy Hubert sued his employer, the City of Baton Rouge, under title VII

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 28, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-31187 Document: 00511187613 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/2010
No. 09-31187

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming employment discrimination and retaliation on account of his failure to get a promotion. The district court granted summary judgment for the city.

The district court pointed out that the person who got the promotion was

black, as is Hubert. The successful candidate was ranked first by the staff, was

more experienced, and was the only candidate who met the educational requirements for the job.

On appeal, Hubert tenders only a five-page brief. The first issue he raises

is that there are genuine fact issues that should preclude summary judgment.

Hubert does not state what the contested facts are.

The second issue is that the district court abused its discretion in denying

Hubert’s motion to alter or amend the judgment. That motion, however, was accompanied by an affidavit that did not raise a fact issue with regard to the relative qualifications of Hubert and the successful candidate. Moreover, Hubert

filed no opposition to the motion for summary judgment, waiting until it had

been granted before filing his affidavit along with the motion to alter or amend.

This appeal is without merit, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 09-31187 Document: 00511187613 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/28/2010
Before the Third Division,

July 13, 1949

No. 53390.

protests 29782-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### John Wagner & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 73

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 28, 1999

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘October 29, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘No-
2

HJ 73 RDS

1 vember 5, 1999’’, and by striking ‘‘$189,524,382’’ in sec2 tion 119 and inserting ‘‘$288,903,248’’. Public Law 106–

3 46 is amended by striking ‘‘November 1, 1999’’ and in4 serting ‘‘November 5, 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 28,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.