alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WQS Regulatory Clarifications -- Discussion with ACWA

Friday, October 14, 2011, 11:00 am – 12:30 pm (ET)

EPA Headquarters (conference call)

Attendees:

 EPA OW-OST: Grace Robiou, Manjali Vlcan, Christina Christensen, Sara HiselMcCoy, Ephraim King

 States: Vermont, Maine, NEWIPIC, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, 

Pennsylvania, West Virginia, South Carolina, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota, 

Wisconsin, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Louisiana, Iowa, Nebraska, Colorado, 

Wyoming, Utah, California, Arizona, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Arkansas, Rhode 

Island.

Topics covered:

 Summarized proposed regulatory revisions

 Summarized input received from states

 Summarized resulting changes made as a result of state input

 Answered questions from states

 Provided overview of next steps and timeline
No. 64692.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., and Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/22794 and 59/24400 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1014 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1014

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
        exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1999

 Mr. Pickett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
        exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Employee Educational Assistance Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to educational assistance programs) is amended by striking 
subsection (d) and by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after May 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
No. P68/130.

protests 63/20984, etc. (New York).

#### Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” or “C” covered by the foregoing protests consist of hose nozzles in chief value of brass or zinc and that said items consist either of hose nozzles that are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859) or they consist of sprays, connections, couplings, adaptors, or shutoffs, each item being screwed on to the end of a garden hose in the same manner that the aforementioned nozzles are attached to a garden hose, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE









RE:
      Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Series FB 2005-1





In
      accordance with Section 3.16 of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
      dated August 25, 2005 ("Agreement"), executed by and between Morgan Stanley
      Capital I Inc. ("Depositor"), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Servicer"
      and "Special Servicer"), LaSalle Bank National Association ("Trustee"), and
      ABN
      Amro Bank N.V. (Fiscal Agent"), as authorized officer of Servicer, I certify
      that (I) a review of the activities and performance of the Servicer during
      the
      preceding calendar year has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
      of
      my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has in all material aspects
      fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement throughout such calendar
      year, and (iii) the Servicer has received no notice asserting a tax on the
      income or assets of any portion of the Trust Fund from the Internal Revenue
      Service or from any other governmental agency or body.





Wells
      Fargo Bank, National Association


“Servicer”








/s/
      Margaret Gremore


Margaret
      Gremore


Vice
      President


Wells Fargo
      Bank National Association


Commercial
      Mortgage
No. 59381.

protests 166279-K, etc. (New York).

#### Atlantic Supply Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grating machines the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Atlantic Supply Co.*v. *United States*(34 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1675), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 55774.

protest 120018-K (Los Angeles).

#### Thalson Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<CIK> 0000878748
<NAME> PolyMedica Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH>                                                                     8155
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             11246
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                756
<INVENTORY>                                                                5262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          27332
<PP&E>                                                                     6586
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             4762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                            78757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     11540
<BONDS>                                                                   22840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                     86
<OTHER-SE>                                                                44291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                              78757
<SALES>                                                                   13958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          13958
<CGS>                                                                      6728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           5411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                            1260 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                429
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                         831
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0.09
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Cathy L. Wood, hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SM&A.



|                     |  | 
|-------------------- |  | 
|Dated: July 30, 2003 |  | 
|                     |  | 



28
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A2314. ALVIN CROSS JR. v. AUTOVEST, LLC.

This appeal was docketed on August 11, 2015. To date, the appellant has not

filed a brief as required by Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). Accordingly, appellant’s

appeal is hereby dismissed pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 7 and 23 (a).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/13/2015

October 13, 2015
February 18, 2021

Ross Oklewicz, Esq.

Associate Counsel

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Boulevard 

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

Dear Mr. Oklewicz:

Acting under authority delegated by the Board,1 I have determined not to 

disapprove the notice filed under the Change in Bank Control Act (“CIBC Act”) 

(12 U.S.C. § 1817(j)) by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“VGI”), Malvern, 

Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and the investment 

companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other pooled 

investment vehicles, and institutional accounts that are sponsored, managed, or 

advised by VGI (collectively, “Notificants”), to acquire aggregate control of 

15 percent or more of SVB Financial Group, parent of Silicon Valley Bank, both 

of Santa Clara, California. In taking this action, I have considered the notice in 

light of the relevant statutory factors under the CIBC Act.

This determination is based on the specific facts and representations 

provided to the Board by Notificants. Any material change in those facts and 

representations could result in a different conclusion and should be immediately 

reported to staff at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“Reserve Bank”). 

This action is specifically conditioned on compliance with all the commitments 

made to the Board related to this notice.

2

 For purposes of this action, the 

commitments are deemed to be conditions imposed in writing by the Board in 

 1

 12 CFR 265.5(c)(2).

2

 See Letter from Mark Van Der Weide to Anne Robinson (November 26, 2019), 

available at 

https://www.federalreserve.gov/supervisionreg/legalinterpretations/bhcchangeinco

ntrol20191126a.pdf.
2

connection with the findings and decision herein and, as such, may be enforced in 

proceedings under applicable law. 

The CIBC Act requires that each insured bank or bank holding company 

promptly report to the appropriate federal banking agency any change or 

replacement of its chief executive officer or any of its directors that occurs within 

the 12 months following any change in control and that it provide a statement of 

the past and current business and professional affiliations of the new chief 

executive officer or directors. We would appreciate Notificants’ cooperation in 

ensuring that, if any such changes occur, the required information be submitted to 

the Reserve Bank.

Very truly yours,

 

Margaret McCloskey Shanks

Deputy Secretary of the Board

cc: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
No. 61697.

#### Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 278215-K (New York).

*491Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1. Information on audit contacts

2. Information on company locations

3. Organizational charts and changes during the audit period

4. Employee position listings

5. Board of directors meeting minutes

6. External audit and consultant information and reports

7. Internal audit information and reports

8. Accounting policies and procedures

9. FERC account details

10. Operations manuals

11. FERC Form No. 1/2/6/60 reporting policies and procedures

12. Financial statement data

13. Financial and/or operational transaction data

14. Compliance program materials and information

15. Information on effective jurisdictional rates on file with the Commission and

relevant docket numbers

16. Information on waivers of Commission requirements and relevant docket

numbers

17. Company chart of accounts with a reconciliation to the Uniform System of

Accounts, if necessary

18. Information on accounting, reporting and operating systems, as relevant to

the audit scope

19. Information on owners, subsidiaries, variable interest entities, and affiliates

20. Information on service agreements with owners, variable interest entities,

affiliates, and other entities

21. General ledger, sub-ledgers, trial balances, and standard and non-standard

journal entries

22. Cost allocation methodologies and studies

23. Record retention policies and procedures

24. Information on retail rate cases over the audit period (if applicable)

25. Tax returns, tax allocation worksheets, and tax sharing agreement over the

audit period (if taxes positions are certain and settled)

26. Information on all active dockets before the Commission

Office of Enforcement

Division of Audits and Accounting

Summary of Initial Data Request Topics
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutraceutical InternationalCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Frank W. Gay II, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ FRANK  W. GAY II                                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Frank W. Gay II                                        |
| *Chairman  of the Board   and Chief Executive Officer* |
| Date:   January 27,  2005               |

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutraceutical InternationalCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Leslie M. Brown, Jr., Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief FinancialOfficer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ LESLIE  M. BROWN, JR.                                                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Leslie M. Brown, Jr.                                                           |
| *Senior  Vice President, Finance,  Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary* |
| Date:   January 27,  2005                                            |

 

Signed originals of these written statements requiredby Section 906 have been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
No. 56254.

protests 175171-K (C), etc. (New York).

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
A89A2254.

#### TAYLOR v. SPENCE.

(390 SE2d 309)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant in a legal malpractice action. The plaintiff retained the defendant to handle the closing of a loan which she had agreed to make to a friend, Coleene Anne Nagem. The loan was to be secured by Ms. Nagem’s residence. The defendant testified in his deposition that the plaintiff wanted Ms. Nagem to execute a quitclaim deed to her home in addition to a promissory note and security deed so that she (the plaintiff) could avoid the “hassle” of instituting a foreclosure proceeding in the event the loan went into default. The defendant stated that the plaintiff insisted upon receiving the quitclaim deed notwithstanding his advice that it “would not be effective to circumvent a foreclosure” and his recommendation that it not “be a part of th[e] transaction.” Ms. Nagem corroborated the defendant’s testimony in this regard, and the plaintiff has not disputed it. After obtaining the quitclaim deed, the plaintiff filed it for recording before the first monthly payment was due on the loan and thereafter sought to dispossess Ms. *356Nagem from the property. Ms. Nagem then filed a successful lawsuit to have the deed set aside.

Decided January 30, 1990.

Charlotte F. Taylor, *pro se.*

*John W. Denney,*for appellee.

The defendant testified that he had exercised that degree of care and skill exercised by lawyers generally under similar conditions and like circumstances and denied having made any misrepresentations to the plaintiff. Although the plaintiff, acting pro se, deposed the attorney who had represented her in Ms. Nagem’s action to set aside the quitclaim deed, she elicited no contrary expert testimony from him or from any other attorney to the effect that the defendant had failed to exercise due care. *Held:*

The sworn testimony of the defendant in a legal malpractice action to the effect that his representation of the plaintiff complied with the applicable standards of professional conduct, if not controverted by expert testimony to the contrary, will authorize the grant of summary judgment in his favor. See *Thomas v. Carlisle,*179 Ga. App. 315, 316 (346 SE2d 79) (1986); *Yates*v. *Carlisle,*171 Ga. App. 206 (319 SE2d 71) (1984); *Graves v. Jones,*184 Ga. App. 128, 129 (361 SE2d 19) (1987). It follows that the trial court did not err in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Sognier, and Pope, JJ., concur.*
GRRALD C. MANN Aus? IX, m 

Hon. Tom L. Beauchamp opinion NO. o-1032 

Secretary of State Re: Is proposed charter of the 

Austin, Texas Motor Club of. Rast Texas an educational undertaking within the 

purview of subdivision 2, Article 

1302, Revised Civil Statutes of 

Dear Sir: 1925. 

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 

23 3939, with which you submit the proposed charter of the 

MoJor Club of East Texas, with a request that we advise you 

whether or’ not the purpose therein expressed is for en educational undertaking.,within the purvbw of subdivision 2 of &- 

title 1302, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925. 

The purpose clause of such proposed corporation is: 

“The purpos,e of this Motor Club shall be an 

educational enterprise, to-wit: This Motor Club 

shall be formed for the purpose of establishing, 

supporting and maintaining an automobile association with power to acquire and own all. property 

incidental to such business, to furnish road information to the general public, to aid. in general 

safety work for school children, to guard against 

automobile accidents, to distribute safety literature in order to reduce-automobile accidents and 

to work for b’etter laws regarding highway legislation and to give free information in regard to 

state highway laws and regulations.” 

We have, this day, written you our opinion No. O1028 on a similar question presented in the proposed charters 

of the Taxpayers Association on Nacogdoches County, Texas. We 

think that the law was fully considered and discussed in such 

opinion and that it is determinative of the question here present ed. 

We, therefore, necessarily conclude, and, you are so 

advised, that the purpose, above set out, is not for an educational undertaking within the purview of subdivision 2, Article 
Hon. Tom L. Beauchamp, page 2 (O-1032) 

1302, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925. 

The proposed charter is, herewith, 

Very truly yours 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

returned. 

OF TEXAS 

By /s/ Lloyd Armstrong 

Lloyd Armstrong, Assistant 

APPROVED JUL 22, 1939 

s/ W. F. Moore 

FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEZY GBNERAL 

LA:omb:wb 

ENCL. 

APPROVED: OPINION COMKITl'86 

BY: T.D.B., Chairman
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.65




                                             September 22, 1998



Mr. Steven J. Lee
112 Farm Road
Sherborn, MA 01770

                  Re: Amendment of Employment Agreement
                      ---------------------------------

Dear Steve,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the employment agreement dated as
of May 16, 1990, by and between you and PolyMedica Industries, Inc. (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of June 1, 1991;
December 5, 1991; March 18, 1993; March 31, 1994; April 11, 1995; April 3, 1996;
July 1, 1997; and July 1, 1998 (together, the "Employment Agreement").

         SALARY. The Base Salary, as defined in Section 3.1. of the Employment
         Agreement, shall be increased to $303,600 effective August 1, 1998.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.

                                             Very truly yours,



                                             /s/ Arthur A. Siciliano
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Arthur A. Siciliano
                                             President

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:



/s/ Steven J. Lee
-------------------------
Steven J. Lee