**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) U**  **nits (40 CFR**  **Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal)**  **1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the**  **Information Collection** NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CI SWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal) , EPA I CR Number 2384.0 3 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0662 **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Units were proposed on April 29, 2010, promulgated on March 21, 2011, and last

- amended on February 7, 2013

. The regulation at subpart CCCC amended the 2000 CI SWINSPS by

re - establishing emission limits and expanding the rule to cover additional four CI SWIsubcategories: energy recovery units ; waste burning kilns ; burn

- off ovens ; and small, remote incinerators. Subpart CCCC applies to new CI SWIunits that commenced con struction after June 4, 2010, or commenced reconstruction or modification after August 7, 2013. The subpart does not affect CI SWIunits that undergo phys ical or operational changes primarily to compl y with the Emission Guidelines at subpart DDDD. This in formation is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC

. In general, all NSPS standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NSPS

. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environm ental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. The population of CI SWIunits has been declining for several years. No new CI SWI units are being constructed, even in the absence of regulations, because other waste disposal alternatives, such as landfilling, are usually more economical. However, for the small remote incinerator subcategory , we realize that other waste disposal alternatives may be unavailable, and therefore some new units may be constructed or older units replaced as their useful life expires. For all other subcategories, the cost of compl ying with the NSPS makes it even more likel y that sources will select an alternative method of waste disposal and no new units in these subcategories will be constructed.2

Over the next three ye ars, we estimate an average of 4 respondents per year will be subject to the se standard s , and 1 additional respondent per ye ar will become subject to the se same standard s
. This is based on the assumption that one new small, remote incinerator is being constructed per year since the se regulation s w ere proposed. The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) approved the currentl y active I CR without any

“Terms of Clearance.” The “Affected Public ” are owners and operators of new CISWIunits. The “burden ” to the Affect ed Public may

be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CI SWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal)

. The Federal Government burden is attributed entirely to work p erformed b y either F ederal employees or government contractors and may be found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal)

. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection**  **2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection** The EPA is charged under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, to establish standards of performance for new stationary sources that reflect:

**. . .** application of the best technological sy stem of continuous emissions reduction which (taking into consideration the cost of achieving such emissions reduction, or any non - air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrat or determines has been adequatel y demonstrated. Section 111(a)(l). The Agency

refers to this charge as selecting the best demonstrated technology (BDT). Section 111 also requires that the Administrator review and, if appropriate, revise such standards every four years. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3);3 and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, particulate matter (PM), dioxins/furans, hydrogen chloride (HCl), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), carbon monoxide ( CO ) , nitrogen oxides (NO x) and sulfur dioxide (S O 2 ) emissions from CISWIunits cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NSPS were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission mo nitor. The notifications required in the se standard s are used to inform either the Agency or its delegated authority

when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the se regulations. The reviewing authority

may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated , leaks are being detected and repaired , and the se standard s are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of ex cess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 4 0 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exists.4

**3(b) Pu blic Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register ( 78 FR 35023 ) on June 11, 2013. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all complianc e data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard s as they were being developed and the standard s have been reviewed previously to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. Indeveloping this ICR, we contacted : 1) the Alaska Oil and Gas Association , at (907) 279

- 1481 ; and 2) the National Waste & Recycling Association , at (800) 424

- 2869

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. In this case, no comments were received. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control eq uipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines**
These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirem ent is consistent with Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is5

based. Th e retention of records for five ye ars allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, any pattern of non

- compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexisten ce of essential records. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions**
The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners and operators of CISWI units . The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SI C ) code s for the respondents affected by the standard and the corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAI CS ) are listed in the table below :6

**40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC**  **SIC Codes NAICS Codes**  Chemical Manufacturing 2865, 2869, 2813, 2879, 2851, 2899, 2891, 2844, 2893, 2892 325
Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods 5012, 5013, 5014, 5015, 5021, 5023, 5031, 5032, 5033, 5039, 5043, 5044, 5045, 5046, 5047, 5048, 5049, 5051, 5052, 5063, 5064, 5065, 5072, 5074, 5075, 5078, 5082, 5083, 5084, 5085, 5087, 5088, 7389, 5091, 5092, 5093, 5094, 5099, 7822 421

Wood Product Manufacturing 2429, 2441, 2448, 2449 321 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing 2432, 5712, 2515, 2591 337

**4(b) Information Requested**  **(i) Data Items**
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y the NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CI SWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC). A source must make the following reports:

**Notification s**  **/Reports** Preconstruction report

• Statement of intent to construct

• Anticipated date of commencement of construction

• Documentation for siting requirements

• Waste management plan

• Anticipated date of initial startup 60.2190 (a)

- (e)

Startup notification 60.2195 (a)

- (e) Initial test report 60.2200 Annual compliance report 60.2205 , 60.2210 Emission limitation or operating limit deviation report 60.2215 , 60.2220 Qualified operator deviation notification 60.2225(a)(1) Qualified operator deviation status report 60.2225(a)(2)7
**Notification s**  **/Reports** Qualified operator deviation notification of resumed operation 60.2225(b) A source must keep the following records:
**Recordkeeping** Records of operating parameters 60. 2175(b), (p) Records of malfunction of the unit 60. 2175(s), (u) Records of exceedances of the operating parameters 60. 2175(e) Records of stack tests 60. 2175(f) Records of siting anal ys is 60. 2175(g) Records of persons who have reviewed operating procedures 60. 2175(h) Records of persons who have completed operator training 60. 2175(i) Records of persons wh o meet operator qualification criteria 60. 2175(j) Records of monitoring device calibration and inspection 60. 2175(k), (o) Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordke eping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with th e respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated th at approximately 10 p ercent of the respon dents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for Hg, Pb, Cd, HCl, PM, CO, dioxins/furans, NOx, and SO 2 . Perform initial performance test, and repeat performance tests if necessary

.8 **Respondent Activities** Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way ( e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem) . Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this ty pe of monitoring equipm ent has significantl y reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information.
**Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated.9

Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to comp ly with the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data f or approximately

125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** There are no small entities (i.e., small businesses) affected b y this regulation

. We expect the NSPS will only

affect units in the small remote incinerator subcategory , which will consist primarily of large oil exploration and development entities. The NSPS does not contain any provisions reserved exclusively for the ben efit of small entities. However, the NSPS does contain provisions that reduce the impact on all regulated entities, which would include any small entities (in the unlikely event that any new CISWI units are built). The owner or operator is allowed to skip two annual performance tests for a pollutant if all performance tests over the previous three ye ars show compliance. Deviation reports are required onl y if there is a deviation, otherwise reporting is annual. The Agency

considers these to be the m inimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Sc hedule**  The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CC CC) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The10

individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Wherever appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information colle ction are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these record

keeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 1,03 6 hours ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1 below). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NSPS program, the previously

approved IC R, and any

comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $ 123.04 ($5 8

. 59 + 110%) Technical $ 10 1

. 2 2 ($4 8

. 2 0 + 110%) Clerical $ 51

. 18 ($2 4

. 37 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs**  The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. Th e capital/startup costs are one

- time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and other costs such as photocopying and posta ge.11 **(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F) Bag Leak Detectors $3,500 1 $3,500 $9,700 4 $38,800 CO CEMS $12,600 1 $12,600 $41,400 4 $165,600 ACI Monitors $0 1 $0 $4,200 4 $16,800 Stack Tests $55,000 1 $55,000 $14,533 4 $58,132 Postage for Performance Tests $ 7.5 1 $ 7.5 $ 7.5 0 4 $3 0 Postage for Semiannual reports $ 0 0 $0 $ 15 0.4 $ 6
**Total $71,108**  **$279,368** The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $ 71,108 . This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $ 279,368

. This is the total of column G. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 350,476

. These are recordkeeping costs. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reporte d information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 15, 817

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rat e as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% )12

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 3 General Schedule , which excludes locality , rates of pay

. The rates have been increased b y 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Co st

– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CI SWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal). **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 4 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that an additional 1 respondent per year will become subject. The overall average number of re spondents, as shown in the table below, is 5 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR : **Number of Respondents**

Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 1 3 0 0 4
2 1 4 0 0 5
3 1 5 0 0 6 **Average** 1 4 0 0 **5** 1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 5

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:13 **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D 1) Notification of initial performance test 1 2 0 2 2) Notification of initial CMS Demonstration 1 1 0 1 3) Report of initial performance test 1 2 0 2 4) Report of initial CMS demonstration NA 0 5) Report prior to construction (includes siting analysis) 1 1 0 1 6) Report prior to initial start

-up 0.33 1 0 0.33 7) Report of initial stack test NA 0 8) Report established values for site

- specific operating parameters 1 1 0 1 9) Waste management plan 1 1 0 1 10) Annual Report 4 1 0 4 11) Status report for operators that are off

site for more than 2 weeks 0.4 2 0 0.8 12) Corrective action summary for operators that are off

- site for more than 2 weeks 0.4 4 0 1.6 13) Semiannual report of emissions/parameter exceedances 0.4 2 0 0.8

**Total 15.5**  **3** NA

- Included in capital/startup costs The number of Total Annual Responses is 16 (rounded). The total annual labor costs are $ 101 , 383

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal)

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown below in Tables 1 and 2, respectively , an d summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 1,03 6 hours at a cost of $101,383

. Details regarding these estimates may

be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CI SWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal)

.14

Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of infor mation is estimated to average 6 5 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $350,476

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. **(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 351 labor hours at a cost of $15, 817 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CI SWI) Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal). **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is an increase in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the I CR currentl y approved b y OMB. This increase is due to a multitude of factors including an increase in the respondent universe since the last ICR period , an update to the labor rates, as well as corrections to errors in the burden e stimates . The primary correction included revising the number of existing respondents subject to annual reporting and recordkeeping requirements

. There is also an increase in the total capital and O&M costs due to an increase in the number of respondents . In addition, this I CR corrects the number of respondents that have to maintain monitors, which also contributes to the increase in O&M costs. There is a decreas e in the Agency burden and cost due to several corrections, primarily associated with the frequency of observing initial stack tests and reviewing excess emission reports.**6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information i s estimated to average 6 5 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing w ay s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control15

Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for t his I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0315

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ , which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:3 0 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 17 52

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 20 13

- 0315 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0662 in any correspondence.
**Pa rt B of the Supporting Statement**  This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.16

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI)**  **U nits**  **(40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal)**

**Burden Item (A)**  **Respondent Hours per**  **Occurrence (B)** 

**Number of Occurrences**  **Per Respondent P**  **er Year (C)** 

**Hours Per Respondent**  **Per Year (A x B)**  **(D)**

**Number of Respondents**  **Per Year (E)** 

**Technical Hours Per**  **Year (C x D)**  **(F)**

**Management Hours Per**  **Year (E x 0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical Hours**  **Per Year (E x 0.1)**  **H**

**Total Labor**  **Costs Per Year**  **a** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements b 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 $112.49 B. Required Activities 1) Initial stack test and report (PM, dioxins/furans, opacity, HCl, Cd, Pb, Hg, CO, NOx, and SO2) Incl

. in Capital/Startup 2) Annual stack test and test report (PM, HCl, Opacity, and Fugitive Ash) c Incl

. in O&M 3) Operator training and qualification a) Establish and teach operator qualification course b 64 1 64 1 64 3.2 6.4 $7,199.36 b) Obtain operator qualification b 72 1 72 1 72 3.6 7.2 $8,099.28 c) Annual refresher course c 12 1 12 4 48 2.4 4.8 $5,399.52 d) Initial review of site

- specific information Incl. in 3A e) Annual review of site

- specific information c 8 1 8 4 32 1.6 3.2 $3,599.68 4) Establish operating parameters (maximum and minimum) b 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,499.60 5 ) Continuous parameter monitoring (including CEMS) a) Initial monitoring 17 1 17 1 17 0.85 1.7 $ 1,912.33 b) Annual monitoring 17 1 17 4 68 3.4 6.8 $ 7,649.32 C. Create Information Incl . in 3 B D. Gather Information Incl . in 3 E E. Report Preparation 1) Notification of initial performance test c17

**Burden Item (A)**  **Respondent Hours per**  **Occurrence (B)** 

**Number of Occurrences**  **Per Respondent P**  **er Year (C)** 

**Hours Per Respondent**  **Per Year (A x B)**  **(D)**

**Number of Respondents**  **Per Year (E)** 

**Technical Hours Per**  **Year (C x D)**  **(F)**

**Management Hours Per**  **Year (E x 0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical Hours**  **Per Year (E x 0.1)**  **H**

**Total Labor**  **Costs Per Year**  **a** a) Pollutants, fugitive ash emissions 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $224.98 b) Fugitive Ash Emissions 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 $112.49 2) Notification of initial CMS Demonstration b 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $224.98 3) Report of initial performance test c a) Pollutants, fugitive ash emissions 8 1 8 1 8 0.4 0.8 $899.92 b) Fugitive Ash Emissions 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $224.98 4) Report of initial CMS demonstration Incl

. in Capital/Startup 5) Report prior to construction (includes siting analysis) b 160 1 160 1 160 8 16 $17,998.40 6) Report prior to initial start

-up a) Without site specific parameter petition 6 1 6 0 0 0 0 $0 b) With site specific parameter petition f 14 1 14 0.33 4.67 0.23 0.47 $524.95 7) Report of initial stack test Incl . in 3 B ( 1 ) 8) Report established values for site

- specific operating parameters Incl

. in 3B 9) Waste management plan b 160 1 160 1 160 8 16 $17,998.40 10) Annual Report: a) Results of performance tests conducted during the year c 40 1 40 4 160 8 16 $17,998.40 11) Status report for operators that are off

- site for more than 2 weeks d 8 2 16 0.4 6.4 0.32 0.64 $719.94 12) Corrective action summary for operators that are off

- site for more than 2 weeks d 8 4 32 0.4 12.8 0.64 1.28 $1,439.87 13) Semiannual report of emissions/parameter exceedances e 24 2 48 0.4 19.2 0.96 1.92 $2,159.81 **Subtotal for Reporting**  **Requirements 1,012.**  **08 $**  **98,998.70** 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions Inc l

. in 3A B. Plan Activities N/A18

**Burden Item (A)**  **Respondent Hours per**  **Occurrence (B)** 

**Number of Occurrences**  **Per Respondent P**  **er Year (C)** 

**Hours Per Respondent**  **Per Year (A x B)**  **(D)**

**Number of Respondents**  **Per Year (E)** 

**Technical Hours Per**  **Year (C x D)**  **(F)**

**Management Hours Per**  **Year (E x 0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical Hours**  **Per Year (E x 0.1)**  **H**

**Total Labor**  **Costs Per Year**  **a** C. Implement Activities N/A D. Develop Record System N/A E. Record Information 1) Records of operating parameters Incl . in 3 B (5 b ) 2) Records of periods for which minimum amount of data on operating parameters were not obtained 0.5 52 26 0 0 0 0 $0 3) Records of malfunction of the unit 1.5 1 1.5 0 0 0 0 $0 4) Records of exceedances of the operating parameters e 1.5 2 3 0.4 1.2 0.06 0.12 $134.99 5) Records of stack tests Included in 3 E 6) Records of siting analysis Included in 3 E 7) Records of persons who have reviewed operating procedures b, c 1 1 1 4 4 0.2 0.4 $449.96 8) Records of persons who have completed operator training b, c 1 1 1 4 4 0.2 0.4 $449.96 9) Records of persons wh o meet operator qualification criteria b, c 1 1 1 4 4 0.2 0.4 $449.96 10) Records of monitoring device calibration Included in 3 B 11) Records of site

- specific documentation f 24 1 24 0.33 8 0.4 0.8 $899.92 F. Personnel Training Included in 3 B G. Time for Audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping**  **Requirements 24.**  **38 $2,384.79**  **TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  **1,036 $**  **101,383**
**Assu mptions:**  (a) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packa ges available to those employed by private industry. (b)One

- time only costs (1 new respondent per year). (c) T his ICR assumes the ave r age number of respondents incurring costs during the 3 year period is 4.19

(d) Assumed that 10 percent of the facilities wo uld not have a qualified operator available for more than two weeks at least once a year. Assumed that this required only two corrective action summaries. (e) Assumed that 10 percent of the facilities would have an exceedance during the year. (f)As sumed that one

- third of the facilities will petition for site

- specific parameters.20

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost**

**– NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI)**  **U nits**  **(40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC) (Renewal)**

**Burden Item (A)**  **EPA Hours per**  **Occurren ce**  **(B)**

**Number of Occurrences**  **Per Respondent**  **Per Year (C)** 

**EPA Hours Per**  **Respondent Per Year**  **(C=A x B) (D)** 

**Number of Respondents**  **Per Year (E)** 

**Technical Hours Per**  **Year (CXD)**  **(F)**

**Management Hours Per**  **Year (E x**  **0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical Hours Per**  **Year (E x 0.1)**  **(H)**

**Total Costs, $** 

1. Applications N/A 2. Read and Understand Rule Requirements b 16 1 16 0 0 0 0 $0 3. Required Activities A. Observe initial stack tests (PM, dioxins/furans, opacity, HCl, Cd, Pb, Hg, CO, NOx, and SO2) a 48 1 48 0.2 9.6 0.48 0.96 $497.52 B. Excess emissions

-- Enforcement Activities c 24 1 24 0.1 2.4 0.12 0.24 $124.38 C. Create Information N/A D. Gather Information N/A E. Report Reviews 1) Review waste management plan and siting analysis b 8 1 8 1 8 0.4 0.8 $414.60 2) Review report submitted prior to initial startup b 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 3) Review initial stack test report b 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $2,072.98 4) Review annual compliance report d 8 1 8 4 32 1.6 3.2 $1,658.38 5) Review semi

- annual excess emission and parameter exceedance report c, d 16 1 16 0.4 6.4 0.32 0.64 $331.68 6) Review status reports and corrective action summary for operators off

- site e 4 3 12 0.4 4.8 0.24 0.48 $248.76 F. Prepare annual summary report 200 1 200 1 200 10 20 $10,364.90 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  **351 $15,**  **81 7** 

**Assu mptions**  **:** a. Assumes EPA personnel attend 20 percent of the stack tests b. One

- time only costs. c. Assume that 10 percent of the facilities have an exceedance during the year. d. Assumes annual costs are not incurred until the second year of operation. For this ICR, assumes the ave rage number of respondents incurring costs during the 3 year period is 4 (see "Miscellaneous").21

e. Assumed that 10 percent of the facilities would not have a qualified operator for more than two weeks at least once a year. Assumed that 1 status report and 2 corrective action summaries are submitted.