alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 27 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H. Gray as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H. Gray as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Dr. Hanna H. Gray of Illinois 
on April 11, 1999, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for 
a term of six years, effective April 12, 1999.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 52

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the East Front of the CapArts. John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing itol Grounds for performances sponsored by the
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 52

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 52 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING USE OF EAST FRONT OF CAP2 ITOL GROUNDS FOR PERFORMANCES SPON3 SORED BY KENNEDY CENTER.

4 In carrying out its duties under section 4 of the John

5 F. Kennedy Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76j), the John F. Ken6 nedy Center for the Performing Arts, in cooperation with

7 the National Park Service (in this resolution jointly re8 ferred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’), may sponsor public perform9 ances on the East Front of the Capitol Grounds at such

10 dates and times as the Speaker of the House of Represent11 atives and Committee on Rules and Administration of the

12 Senate may approve jointly.

13 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any performance authorized

15 under section 1 shall be free of admission charge to the

16 public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of

17 Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Archi18 tect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

19 (b) ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall

20 assume full responsibility for all liabilities incident to all

21 activities associated with the performance.

22 SEC. 3. PREPARATIONS.

23 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—In consultation

24 with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the

25 Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the

26 Architect of the Capitol shall provide upon the Capitol
3

•HCON 52 EH

1 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and

2 other related structures and equipment as may be required

3 for a performance authorized under section 1.

4 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

5 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board may make such

6 additional arrangements as may be required to carry out

7 the performance.

8 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

9 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce10 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

11 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con12 cerning sales, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol

13 Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the

14 Capitol Grounds, with respect to a performance authorized

15 by section 1.

16 SEC. 5. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

17 A performance may not be conducted under this reso18 lution after September 30, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12233]

                    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 620(q) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), Executive Order 12163, and Department of State Delegation of Authority 513, I hereby determine that assistance for Uzbekistan and Romania is in the national interest of the United States and thereby waive                           ( print page 73930)                        the application of section 620(q) of the FAA with respect to such assistance.                

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and, with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be transmitted to Congress.                

Dated: June 30, 2023.

Wendy R. Sherman,

Deputy Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-23719 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 22

- 00437

- CV

__________________ ALEXANDRIA MONIC GREEN , Appellant
V.
CHANNING THOMAS GREEN AND OFFICE OF THE TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 238 , 683

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 29, 2022, Alexandria Monic Green , Appellant , appealed from
a final decree of divorce in Trial Cause Number C

- 238 , 683 . After perfecting her appeal, however , Appellant failed to file a brief. On May 23, 2023, we notified the parties that A ppellant had not filed a brief
and that h er appeal would be submitted without briefs unless, by June 2 , 2023, we
received a brief in h er appeal together with a motion to exte nd the time to file h er2 brief. We also warned A ppellant that h er appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the appeal was submitted without briefs. On June 15 , 2023, we notified the parties that the appeal would be submitted on July 6, 2023, wit hout briefs and without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. In the absence of a brief assigning error for our review, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 6, 2023 Opinion Delivered July 20, 2023 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Before the Third Division,

July 23, 1947

No. 51851.

#### Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York *v.*United States,

petition 6358-R (Providence).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the petitioner herein, who acted as surety upon the importer’s bond, had paid the additional duties required by the collector. A test case was decided in Reap. Dec. 5002 and the court held that the dutiable export value consisted of the appraised unit values, less 3 percent, less % percent as swell allowance, less nondutiable charges. Pending said decision, an investigation was made in New York, but since no information could be obtained from customs officials, the entries in question were made on the basis of the invoiced prices actually paid by the importer. The record in Abstract 50301 was incorporated herein and it appeared from the testimony that H. Victor Crawford had acted as liquidator for the importer until June 8, 1942, when his license expired; that prior to that date he signed amended entries in New York on behalf of the importer in question; that the amended entries were filed on August 13, 1942, but they were not accepted by the collector because they were unsigned, inasmuch as Mr. Crawford had ceased to act as liquidator and no one in this country had a power of attorney to sign on behalf of the corporation. Upon the entire record it was held that there was no attempt made to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the goods. The petition was therefore granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

John S. Ostaszewski                                          Applera Corporation
Treasurer                                                          301 Merritt 7
                                                              Norwalk, CT  06851





February 5, 2003


Hugo Arias
Vice President
Citibank, N.A.
388 Greenwich St., 23rd Flr
NY, NY  10013

Dear Hugo,

Pursuant to Section 2.05 of the Credit Agreement dated as of April 20, 2000, and
as Administrative Agent for the Lenders, we hereby request that the Commitments
of the Lenders be ratably reduced by a total of $50,000,000 effective
immediately. This request will reduce the total committed facilities from
$100,000,000 to $50,000,000. Please note that there are currently no Competitive
Bid Advances outstanding.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter of instruction,
please do not hesitate to call either Eric Vatne, Director - Corporate Finance
and Cash Management at 203-840-2614, or me.

Sincerely,


/s/John S. Ostaszewski


JSO/gmg







                                                                T (203) 840-2610
                                                                F (203) 840-2636
                                                            ostaszjs@applera.com
Customer Procedure - TS-MF06Y4 

CONFIDENTIAL

{ 

The notified substance will form a polymer capsule. This activity will take place at 

facility in . 

The polymer will not be sold as a discrete substance; it is part of the capsule formulation 

and is built in situ when producing the capsules. It will be prepared only in combination 

with water, perfume oil and other excipients. The described production process in this 

paper is more a description of polymer formation and not actual manufacturing process. 

The polymer could be produced this way, but since it serves as a capsule shell material, it 

must be synthesized in situ during the encapsulation process, at the interface between 

water and perfume oil droplets. 

The polymer capsules containing perfume oil and/or other components will be 

incorporated in slurry. 

The concentration of the notified substance in the slurry will be 5-7%. The slurry

containing the notified substance will be shipped to a customer in 200 kg drums. The 

notified substance will be incorporated in the final product at 0.07%. 

The slurry will be transferred from a shipping container into a storage container 

(Exposure A). Empty drums will be landfilled (Release 1). The slurry will be added to the 

product base (detergent, cleaning formulation, etc.). The finished product will then be 

piped in the conveyor lines for filling, dispensed in the end-use containers, and 

distributed to the point of sales. The equipment will be washed in the end of the 

manufacturing campaign (Release 2). Several samples may be taken for quality control.

A. The PMN substance will be transferred from a shipping container into a storage 

container (Exposure 1); the emptied drums will be sent to a landfill (Release 1).

B. The slurry will be pumped in the production batch.

C. The ingredients will be mixed until blend is uniform and passes QA. 

D. A sample will be taken after all ingredients are charged into the mixing vessel to 

ensure all ingredients were added, and the % of each ingredient is correct. The QC 

samples will be discarded into a holding container, and landfilled (Release 2). 

E. Finished product is dispensed in the containers, and shipped to the point-of-sale.

F. The mixing vessel will not be rinsed between the batches of the same formula. 

Rinsing will typically take place at the end of each manufacturing campaign. The 

rinsate containing trace amounts of the PMN substance will be released into 

POTW (Release 3). 
}

B

Mixing 

Vessel

PMN Substance is added 

to the mixing vessel 

- Stabilizer

- Carrier 

- Auxiliary components

Conveyor line

Mixing vessel is 

rinsed between 

campaigns

Release 3

Empty drums are sent 

to a landfill

D

QC 

o To ensure all ingredients were 

added, and

o % ingredients are correct

o Samples will be discarded into 

a drum and land filled

Release 1

Exposure 1

C

Exposure 2

Release 2

E

F

A

The finished product is 

dispensed, packaged, and 

sent to the point of sales
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7096

LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD, a/k/a Jonah The Tishbite, a/k/a Gabriel Jahjah T. Tishbite, a/k/a, John Gabriel Jahjah Tishbite , Movant

- Appellant , and
RON SANTA MCCRAY , Petitioner ,

v.
WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge; Shiva Vafai Hodges , Magistrate Judge. ( 1:22

- cv 01204

- TLW

- SVH )

Submitted : April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7096 Doc: 23 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Lawrence Crawford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7096 Doc: 23 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Lawrence L. Crawford seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his
motion to intervene in the underlying habeas action and he has filed a motion to supplement the appeal . The magistrate judge entered the dismissal order on May 6, 2022 . Affording
Crawford the benefit of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c) and Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988) , the earliest date his notice of appeal may be deemed filed is September 14, 2022 , beyond
both the 30

- day appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) , and the 30

- day excusable neglect period allowed under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). See Shah v. Hutto , 72 2 F.2d 1167,
1168

- 69 (4th Cir. 1983). However, because Crawford’s notice of appeal suggests that Crawford did not timely receive notice of the denial of his motion to intervene , we construe the notice of appeal as a motion to reopen the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) , c ompare
United States v. Feuver , 236 F.3d 725, 729 & n.7 (D.C. Cir. 2001) , and remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Crawford can satisfy the requirements for reopening set fort h in Rule 4(a)(6). ∗ The record, as supplemented,
will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We defer action on Crawford’s motion to supplement.
REMANDED

∗ We express no opinion as to whether Crawford is entitled to a reopening of the appeal period and leave that determination to the district court in the first instance. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7096 Doc: 23 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
Opinion issued August 8, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00159-CV

———————————

STEVEN CHANG, Appellant

V.

SHU ZHU CHEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 328th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 16-DCV-236653

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Steven Chang, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file 

brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did 

not adequately respond. See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal 
2

of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. 

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower.
No. 65290.

#### Joseph S. Rosenberg, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/12091 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3


                           RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT FROM
                            REGISTRANT TO S. JOHNSON


During June 1998, Cygnet agreed to grant Steven P. Johnson 15,000 shares of
restricted common stock of Cygnet on or about the effective date of the split-up
transaction, subject to certain conditions.
No, 57862.

protests 215268-K, etc. (New York).

#### Dodge & Olcott, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Orbis Products Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 1527), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION





I, Gregory S. Fredrick, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Human Pheromone Sciences, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: August 13, 2007







/s/ Gregory S. Fredrick

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 11

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that Federal judges be reconfirmed by the Senate every 10 years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that Federal judges be reconfirmed

by the Senate every 10 years.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 11 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 1 of article III of this Con3 stitution, a judge of an inferior court created under that

4 article may not, except with the consent of the Senate,

5 hold office for more than 10 years after—

6 ‘‘(1) the judge took office,

7 ‘‘(2) the Senate last consented to the continu8 ance in office of the judge, or

9 ‘‘(3) the ratification of this article,

10 whichever last occurs.’’.

Æ
May 9, 1956

No. 59908.—Suit 4843.

#### U. S. Vitamin Corporation *v.*United States

C. D. 1664 affirmed January 20, 1956. C. A. D. 607.