alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. J. Res. 75

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–62 is further amended by striking ‘‘November 5, 1999’’ in

section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘November 10, 1999’’. Public Law 106–

46 is amended by striking ‘‘November 5, 1999’’ and inserting

‘‘November 10, 1999’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 8.1

                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

List of  subsidiaries  in which we have a direct  interest,  as of December  31,
2002:

1. Telegoias Celular S.A. - Goiania - GO - Brazil

2. Telemat Celular S.A. - Cuiaba - MT - Brazil

3. Telems Celular S.A. - Campo Grande - MS - Brazil

4. Teleron Celular S.A. - Porto Velho - RO - Brazil

5. Teleacre Celular S.A. - Rio Branco - AC - Brazil

6. Norte Brasil Telecom S.A. - Belem - PA - Brazil

7. TCO IP S.A. - Brasilia - DF - Brazil
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 2 51 V

UNPUBLISHED

RHONDA G. SHEPHERD

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: May 28, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; Shoulder Injury

Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

William E. Cochran, Jr., Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, P.C., Memphis, TN , for

petitioner.

Daniel Anthony Principato , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On March 5, 2020

, Rhonda Shepherd filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of a pneumococcal con jugate vaccine administered on January 18, 2019 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 On May 27, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent has concluded that, based on the records filed in this case,

Petitioner suffered a Table SIRVA

. Id. at 3 . Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the V a ccine Act

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Before the First Division,

July 20, 1951

No. 55765.

protests 78034-K, etc. (New York).

#### Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items consist of alabaster beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead,*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and other items consist of white beads the same as those involved in *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10



EXHIBIT 10.3

British Columbia

Ministry of Employment and Investment

Energy and Minerals Division

Mineral Titles Branch



Mineral Tenure Act

Section 57 and 58



	
BILL OF SALE ABSOLUTE
	 
	
INDICATE TYPE OF TITLE:
	
Mineral

	
MINING DIVISION
	
Vernon




SELLER:

I, Stephen Kenwood, of 133629 Marine Drive, White Rock, BC, (604) 535-8146, Client Number 134185.

PURCHASER:

Manu Forti Group Inc., 225 - 425 Carrall Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6B 6E3, (604) 762-7002.

For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) paid to me, do hereby sell the interest as specified below in the following mineral titles:

	
Claim Name or Lease Type
	
Units (Hectares)
	
Tag Number
	
Record Number
	
Percentage of Title Being Sold

	
CRUZ
	
20 (500 ha)
	
244433
	
404255
	
100%




I declare that I have good title to these tenures and every right to sell the same, in witness whereof, I have today signed my legal name.

August 11, 2003


	
/s/ "Stephen Kenwood"
	
/s/"Rod Husband"

	
Stephen Kenwood
	
Rod Husband, Witness
No. 67237.

protests 59/16970, etc. (New York).

#### E. W. Bruno Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Olivee, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005


AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company


Via UPS

February 23, 2006


Diana Kenneally
U.S. Bank National Association
1 Federal Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110

RE:	SAIL 2005-HE1
	Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Kenneally:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending
on December 31, 2005:

1.	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master
Servicer during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the
Trust Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the
Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities
or obligations under the Agreements;

2.	Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
the Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the terms
of the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if there is a default
in the fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default or
failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

3.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead
this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement during
the preceding calendar year;

4.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement in any
material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment of its
obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature and
status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

5.	The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual audit
report, in each case to the extent required under the applicable Servicing
Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been received by
the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best reasonable efforts
to obtain such certificate or report.


Certified By:


/s/ R. Peter Karr
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division
<PAGE>

           Amendment to the Basic Agreement of June 17/th//18/th/ 1999

                                     between

                               LION bioscience AG
                                Waldhoferstr. 98,
                            69123 Heidelberg, Germany
                        represented by its managing board
                           -called "LION" hereinafter-

                                       and

                                    Bayer AG
                                51368 Leverkusen
                          -called "BAYER" hereinafter-


<PAGE>

Due to the successful co-operation of LION and BAYER during the first 2 years of
the contractual period the parties agree to amend the Basic Agreement of June
17/th//18/th/ 1999 as follows:

As the delivery of human or rat genes encoding for druggable or therapeutic
proteins was realized in a much faster sequence than originally provided in
Annex 1.9, in addition to the term 8 of the Basic Agreement BAYER agrees to pay
to LION a one time success premium of US $2.310.000.

All other provisions of the Basic Agreement remain in force without
modification.

In Witness thereof, the parties hereof, intending to be bound hereby, have
signed this Amendment as of the dates indicated here:

Executed by and on behalf of LION bioscience AG

Heidelberg, 15.2.2002

   /s/ Friedrich von Bohlen und Halbach
---------------------------------------
Dr. Friedrich von Bohlen und Halbach

Executed by and on behalf of Bayer AG
Leverkusen,

   /s/ Wolfgang Hartwig
---------------------------------------
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hartwig
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 75

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 5, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting in

5 lieu thereof ‘‘November 10, 1999’’. Public Law 106–46

6 is amended by striking ‘‘November 5, 1999’’ and inserting

7 in lieu thereof ‘‘November 10, 1999’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 62 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 62

To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change between Georgia 
                          and South Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 1999

 Mr. Linder (for himself, Mr. Kingston, and Mr. Spence) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change between Georgia 
                          and South Carolina.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSENT OF CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The consent of Congress is given to the 
establishment of the boundary between the States of Georgia and South 
Carolina.
    (b) New Boundary.--The boundary referred to in subsection (a) is 
the boundary--
            (1) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act Number 1044 
        (S.B. No. 572) approved by the Governor on April 5, 1994, and 
        agreed to by the State of South Carolina in Act Number 375 
        (S.B. No. 1315) approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996;
            (2) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act Number 1044 
        (S.B. No. 572) approved by the Governor on April 5, 1994, and 
        agreed to by the State of South Carolina in an Act approved by 
        its Governor not later than 5 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this joint resolution;
            (3) agreed to by the State of South Carolina in Act Number 
        375 (S.B. No. 1315) approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996, 
        and agreed to by the State of Georgia in an Act approved by its 
        Governor not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment 
        of this joint resolution; or
            (4) agreed to by the States of Georgia and South Carolina 
        in Acts approved by each of their Governors not later than 5 
        years after the date of enactment of this joint resolution.
    (c) Compact.--The Acts referred to in subsection (b) are recognized 
by Congress as an interstate compact pursuant to section 10 of article 
I of the United States Constitution.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2201

MICHAEL D. HARWLEY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Lynchburg. Robert Stewart Ballou, Magistrate Judge. (6:16-cv-00032-RSB)

Submitted: February 28, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Harwley, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Benderson, Evelyn Rose Marie Protano, 

Theresa Ann Casey, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Harwley appeals the magistrate judge’s order upholding the 

Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Harwley’s applications for disability 

insurance benefits and supplemental security income and the magistrate judge’s order 

denying Harwley’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.

1

 “In social security proceedings, a court 

of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a 

reviewing court must uphold the determination when an ALJ has applied correct legal 

standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” 

Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and 

internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind 

might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It consists of more than a mere 

scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Pearson v. Colvin, 810 F.3d 

204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “In reviewing 

for substantial evidence, we do not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make 

credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. Where 

conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is 

disabled, the responsibility for that decision falls on the ALJ.” Hancock v. Astrue, 667 

F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted).

 1 The parties consented to a final disposition by the magistrate judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
3

We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. The ALJ applied 

the correct legal standards in evaluating Harwley’s claims for benefits, and the ALJ’s 

factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the orders upholding the denial of benefits and 

denying Rule 59(e) relief. See Harwley v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 

6:16-cv-00032-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2017; Oct. 5, 2017). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.2

AFFIRMED

 2 For this reason, we deny Harwley’s motion to participate in oral argument.
[LETTERHEAD
OF WIENER, GOODMAN & COMPANY, P.C.]
   EXHIBIT
23.1
  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
  To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
 of
BigString Corporation
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-127923 on Form SB-2, as amended and supplemented, Registration Statement No.
333-135837 on Form SB-2, as amended and supplemented, and the Registration
Statement No. 333-135180 on Form S-8 of
BigString Corporation of our report dated March 28, 2008 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of BigString Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2007 and 2006, and for the period October 8, 2003 (Date of Formation)
through December 31, 2007, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of BigString Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2007.
  /s/
Wiener, Goodman & Company, P.C.
 
 Wiener,
Goodman & Company, P.C.
 Certified
Public Accountants
 
 March 28,
2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 73 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 73

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 1999

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-62 is 
further amended by striking ``October 29, 1999'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``No-
vember 5, 1999'', and by striking ``$189,524,382'' in section 119 and 
inserting ``$288,903,248''. Public Law 106-46 is amended by striking 
``November 1, 1999'' and inserting ``November 5, 1999''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 68566.

protests 62/13418, etc. (New York).

#### S. Hiller & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. *Joannou Cycle*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
BepoRE Judge Landis,

July 11, 1966

No. R66/23.

#### The Alvin Naiman Corporation et al. *v.*United States, reappraisements R62/3475, etc. (Cleveland).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those in *Alvin Naimam, Corporation*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 705, Reap. Dec. 11008), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise in question, described as Dolomite or screenings or stone, and that such value is the appraised value, less the following charges: Trucking at Port Colbome from quarry to dock, $0.15 (Canadian currency) per net ton, and stacking at Port Colbome, $0.05 per net ton (Canadian currency).
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Rapino, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the  Annual Report on Form 10-K of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.








Date: June 30, 2015By:/s/ Michael RapinoMichael RapinoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**DateI, E. Todd Whittemore, Executive Vice President of Aurora Loan Services LLC., certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofStructured Asset Investment Loan TrustMortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2005-HE1;Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a  whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and  based on upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; andThe reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:TitleU.S. Bank National Association, as TrusteeSignature1.2.3.4.5.     3/29/2006                                                                                                          /s/ E. Todd Whittemore                                                                                                        Executive Vice PresidentHomeq Servicing Corporation, as Servicer