alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GEORGE ANTHONY TOLIVER, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 84176 

### FEE: 4 202;
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL fri:P This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se notice of appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Christy L. Craig, Judge. On January 27, 2022, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in district court case number C-21-353123-1. The notice of appeal fails to cite any identifiable order in the notice of appeal. SeeNRAP 3(c)(1)(B) (requiring a notice of appeal to "designate the judgment, order or part thereof being appealed"). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Silver
J. 

# PìeÅ4up

, Cadish Pickering IA postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus was orally denied on November 30, 2021, in related district court case number A-21- 841549-W. However, that order was not designated in this appeal. Appellant may file an appeal from that order when the district court enters a written order. 

### 22-0607,Ccc: Hon. Christy L. Craig, District Judge George Anthony Toliver Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 1,17A -.ink:, 2
No. 52426.

protests 892090-G, etc. (New York).

#### Swiss Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cotton lace curtains similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Perseverance Import Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(72 Treas. Dec. 722, T. D. 49290). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 67268.

protest 61/13217 (Los Angeles).

#### Stor-All Corp. and Arthur J. Fritz & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of barbecue grills similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66689, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10680)

#### Charles A. Koon, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2956-H, etc.

(Decided December 10, 1963)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain seamless steel tubing and seamless steel casing forms the subject of the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of seamless steel tubing and seamless steel casing, exported from Italy, and that the facts and the law are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *United, States*v. *Dalminter, Inc., R. W. Smith,*47 Gust. Ot. 577, A.R.D. 135.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in A.R.D. 135 be incorporated with the record in this ease.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices at which such or similar imported merchandise was freely offered for sale for consumption in the United States, packed ready for delivery, in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers, at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, were the prices shown on Schedule A hereto attached less 2 per cent cash discount less 5.9414 per cent for general expenses and 0.8070 ■ per cent for profit less ocean freight of $13.50 per metric ton less inland freight of $6.00 per metric ton less duty of 7% per cent on casing Grade J-55 or 7% per cent plus 4 per cent on casing Grade N-80 or 12% per cent on tubing Grade J-55 or 12% per cent plus 4 per cent on tubing Grade N-80.

Upon tbe record before the court and following the cited authority, I find and hold that United States value, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(e)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis of value for the seamless steel tubing and seamless steel casing in issue and that said value is represented by the prices shown *472on schedule A, hereto attached, less 2 per centum cash discount, less 5.9414 per centum for general expenses and 0.8070 per centum for profit, less ocean freight of $13.50 per metric ton, less inland freight of $6 per metric ton, less duty of *7y2*per centum on casing grade J-55 or *7y2*per centum plus 4 per centum on casing grade N-80, or 1214 per centum on tubing grade J-55 or *12y2*per centum, plus 4 per centum on tubing grade N-80.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. R67/116.

#### Lollytogs, Ltd. *v.*United States, reappraisement R65/16184 (Portland, Oreg.).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those in Lollytogs, *Ltd. v. United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 608, Reap. Dec. 11073), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise (children’s clothing) and that such values are the invoice unit f.o.b. values, net packed, exclusive of any additional charges or commissions.
Case No. 13,623.

#### The SUNSHINE.

[1 Brown, Adm. 75.] *1*

District Court. N. D. Ohio.

June, 1859.

Tender — Pbactice in Admiralty.

A tender after suit brought must include costs, though the process has' not been served.

An attachment was issued against the Sunshine upon a libel hied by one Kimball. The marshal returned that the vessel could not be found in his district. Afterwards the owner came into court, tendered the amount of the debt claimed in the libel, but without costs.

Willey & Carey, for libellant.

Ranney. Backus & Noble, for respondent,

insisted that the claimant was not bound to include costs in the tender, as there had been no arrest of the vessel.

WILLSON, District Judge.

The tender should include not only the debt, but all costs incurred up to that time, notwithstanding the vessel has never been seized. The filing of the libel and the delivery of the writ to the officer is a commencement of suit which entitles the libellant tc costs. Decree for li-bellant.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Utilicraft  Aerospace  Industries,  Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Randy Moseley,  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss..906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: April 15, 2008

By: /s/ Randy Moseley
---------------------
 Randy Moseley,
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 54495.

#### Gallagher & Ascher Co. *v.*United States,

protests 121083-K/622 and 122032-K/708 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 2, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 20, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
81 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-21, CP2024-21.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24143 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
SR letter 17-5

Attachment C

Sample Acknowledgment Letter

Page 1 of 1

[NAME]

[TITLE]

[FIRM NAME]

[ADDRESS]

[CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE] 

Dear [NAME]:

This is to acknowledge receipt by the Federal Reserve Bank of [DISTRICT] (“Reserve 

Bank”), as of [RECEIPT DATE], of the request dated [APPLICATION DATE], by 

[APPLICANT], [CITY], [STATE] (the “Applicant”), for an extension of the one-year seeding 

period for a hedge fund or private equity fund pursuant to section 13 of the Bank Holding 

Company Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1851.

Consistent with the statute, an extension may be granted for a period of up to two years. 

The Reserve Bank expects to act on an extension request within 30 days of receiving all required 

information. If the request does not meet the requirements for delegated action by the Reserve 

Bank, the Reserve Bank will refer the matter to the Board. The Board may then approve or deny 

the request based on the relevant facts.

Please contact [RESERVE BANK PRIMARY CONTACT] at [PHONE NUMBER] or 

[ALTERNATE RESERVE BANK CONTACT], if you have any questions regarding this letter.

Sincerely,

Name of Reserve Bank Official 

Title
No. 51246.

#### Protests 116872-K, etc., of Anachemia, Ltd., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in-Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Order filed February 4, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00022

- CV

____________ CLAUDIA HARPER, INDI VIDUALLY AND AS INDE PENDENT CO

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ES TATE OF JAMES WESLEY CLERK, JR.,

AND ALICE CLARK , Appellant s

V.

KIR BY CORPORATION AND K IRBY INLAND MARINE, L.P., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 09913A



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a summary judgment signed October 28, 2013, and made appealable by o rder of severance signed December 6, 2013 . The notice of appeal was due January 6, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 Appellants’ notice of appeal was filed one day late on January 7, 2014 . A m otion fo r extension of time is “necessarily implied” when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of2

its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant s did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. Whi le an extension may be implied, appellant s are still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd.
, 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet. ). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant s to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will
dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1010 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1010

To improve participation in the 2000 decennial census by increasing the 
amounts available to the Bureau of the Census for marketing, promotion, 
                             and outreach.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1999

Mr. Miller of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve participation in the 2000 decennial census by increasing the 
amounts available to the Bureau of the Census for marketing, promotion, 
                             and outreach.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds as follows:
            (1) A national media campaign is essential to increase the 
        mail response for the 2000 decennial census.
            (2) Promotional events will emphasize the importance of 
        participating in the census, and will motivate people to 
        respond.
            (3) More resources are needed to ensure that the Bureau of 
        the Census is able to carry out an effective marketing, 
        promotion, and outreach campaign, especially in the hardest-to-
        count communities.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Bureau of the Census 
$300,000,000 for fiscal year 2000 to carry out promotional, outreach, 
and marketing activities in connection with the 2000 decennial census 
of population.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

March 6, 1968

No. P68/121.

protests 63/3462 and 63/3465 (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Norcrest China Company *v.*United States,

*1013Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. *Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484); that the items of merchandise marked *“S”*consist of cups and saucers which are not, in fact, chiefly used as tableware, but are chiefly used as souvenir articles; and that the items marked “D” consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 394

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in the

enrollment of S. 1374.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical

corrections in the enrollment of S. 1374.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1374)

3 to authorize the development and maintenance of a multi4 agency campus project in the town of Jackson, Wyoming,

5 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor6 rections:

7 (1) In section 1, strike ‘‘1999’’ and insert

8 ‘‘2000’’.

9 (2) In section 5(a), strike ‘‘section 3’’ and in10 sert ‘‘section 4’’.
2

•HCON 394 ATH

1 (3) In section 7(a)(1), strike ‘‘memorandum of

2 agreement referred to in section 4(a)(1)(A)’’ and in3 sert ‘‘memorandum of understanding referred to in

4 section 4(a)(1)(B)’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report),
I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



/S/    J. NICK
RIEHLEJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer


March 10, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 110 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275 is 
amended by striking ``October 6, 2000'' in section 106(c) and inserting 
in lieu thereof ``October 14, 2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
Before Judge DoNLON,

August 17, 1967

No. R67/97.

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisement R61/3252 (New York).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the mer.-chandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held (1) that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for determination of the value of the 12 ounce tins, corned beef, first grade, described on the invoice and entry covered by this appeal for reappraisement, and that such value is $2.7311 per dozen 12 ounce tins, net packed, and (2) that United States value, as defined in section 402a (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for determination of the value of the 6 pound tins, corned beef, first grade, described on the invoice and entry covered by this appeal for reappraisement, and that such value is $19.9724 per dozen 6 pound tins, net packed.
No. 57856.

protest 217858-K (New York).

#### Patel, Pein & Hudson, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hot plate mats the same in all materials respects as those the subject of Abstract 57261, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1017

To provide for budgetary reform by requiring a balanced Federal budget

and the repayment of the national debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1999

Mr. SCHAFFER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for budgetary reform by requiring a balanced

Federal budget and the repayment of the national debt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Debt Repay5 ment Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. BALANCED BUDGET REQUIREMENT.

7 Beginning with fiscal year 2000 and for every fiscal

8 year thereafter, budgeted outlays shall not exceed budg9 eted revenues.
2

•HR 1017 IH

1 SEC. 3. REDUCTION OF NATIONAL DEBT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning with fiscal year 2000

3 and for every fiscal year thereafter, actual revenues shall

4 exceed actual outlays in order to provide for the reduction.

5 (b) AMOUNT.—The amount of reduction required by

6 this subsection shall be equal to the amount required to

7 amortize the debt over the next 30 years in order to repay

8 the entire debt by the end of fiscal year 2029.

9 SEC. 4. WAIVER.

10 Congress may waive the provisions of this Act for any

11 fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect.

12 SEC. 5. MAJORITY REQUIREMENT FOR REVENUE IN13 CREASE.

14 No bill to increase revenues shall be deemed to have

15 passed the House of Representatives or the Senate unless

16 approved by a majority of the total membership of each

17 House of Congress by a rollcall vote.

18 SEC. 6. REVIEW OF REVENUES.

19 Congress shall review actual revenues on a quarterly

20 basis and adjust outlays to assure compliance with this

21 Act.

22 SEC. 7. DEFINITION.

23 In this Act—

24 (1) the term ‘‘revenues’’ shall include all reve25 nues of the United States excluding borrowing; and
3

•HR 1017 IH

1 (2) the term ‘‘outlays’’ shall include all outlays

2 of the United States excluding repayment of debt

3 principal.

Æ
Case No. 13,012.

#### SMITH v. BARKER.

[Brunner, Col. Cas. 52;1

3 Day, 280.]

Circuit Court, D. Connecticut.

Sept., 1808.

Affidavit foe Continuance — Extrinsic Evidence not Admissible to Explain.

An affidavit in support of a motion to put off a cause for the absence of a witness cannot be explained by matters extrinsic.

[For the hearing in this cause, see Case No. 13,013.]

[This was an action of assumpsit by Nathan Smith against Jacob Barker for breach of a contract. The cause is now heard on a motion fot a continuance.]

Mr. Goddard, in support of a motion for a continuance of this cause, read an affidavit of the absence of a witness.

Mr. Daggett, contra, contended that there had been negligence in procuring the attendance of the witness.

Mr. Goddard was about to make some remarks in explanation, when he was interrupted by—

LIVINGSTON, Circuit Justice.

When an affidavit is relied upon the court will not go out of it. I shall, therefore, decline hearing any ore tenus explanation. The name of the witness must always be disclosed in the affidavit unless there are circumstances to show that the party, without any fault of his, was unable to. learn his name. Hereafter when a cause is ready for trial no application for a continuance will be successful unless upon an affidavit conformable to the English practice.

His honor remarked upon the inconveniences of putting off a cause ready for trial in this court, and said the English courts, and the courts in those states which follow the English practice, were growing more strict upon this subject.