alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

p0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146526

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146526

COA: 310860

Midland CC: 11

- 004759

- FH

STEPHEN PAUL VAUGHN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,343
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,318
<INVENTORY>                                     10,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,432
<PP&E>                                       1,488,508
<DEPRECIATION>                               (693,722)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,433,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,143
<BONDS>                                      1,864,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,040
<OTHER-SE>                                   (675,771)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,433,266
<SALES>                                         22,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254,565
<CGS>                                           10,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,063
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,624
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (95,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (95,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (95,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.92)


</TABLE>
Order entered May 28 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01146
- CR JOSEPH WAYNE HUNTER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F13
- 56295
- R



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On May 19 , 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s
brief ha d not been filed. On May 27, 2015, we received appellant’s brief, together with an
extension mo tion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the May 19, 2015 order requiring findings.
We GRANT the May 27, 2015 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as
of the date of this order.
We ORDER Mary Snider, former official court reporter of the 265th Judicial District Court, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 14.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Mary Snider, official court reporter

283rd Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Exhibit99(A)

KPMG LLP

Suite 2000355 South GrandAvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071-1568

IndependentAccountants’ Report

The Board ofDirectorsAmerican Honda Finance Corporation

Membersof the Board:

We have examined management’sassertion about American Honda Finance Corporation’s (theCompany) compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth inthe Mortgage Bankers Association of America Uniform SingleAttestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, as they relate to theservicing of retail automobile loan contracts, as of and for the yearended March  31,  2006 included in the accompanyingmanagement’s assertion. The minimum servicing standards notconsidered by the Company to be applicable to the servicing of retailautomobile loans include procedures 2, 3, and 4 of Section I– Custodial Bank Accounts, procedures 1, 2, 3, and 4of Section III – Disbursements, and procedures 2, 3, and 4 ofSection V – Mortgage Loan Accounting. Management is responsiblefor the Company’s compliance with the applicable minimumservicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion about the Company’s compliancebased on our examination.

Our examination was made inaccordance with standards established by the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants and, accordingly, including examining, ona test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theminimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards.

In our opinion, American Honda FinanceCorporation has complied, in all material respects, with theaforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year endedMarch  31,  2006.

This report is intendedsolely for the information and use of management and the board ofdirectors, the Trustee, and the related beneficiaries and holders (asdefined in the Agreement of Definitions Relating to the Trust andServicing Agreement dated April  1,1998).

/s/ KPMG LLP

June9,  2006

----

HONDA FINANCIALSERVICES

MANAGEMENT ASSERTION

As of and for theyear ended March  31,  2006, American Honda FinanceCorporation has complied in all material respects with the minimumservicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association ofAmerica’s Uniform Single Attestation Program for MortgageBankers.

The minimum servicing standards not consideredapplicable to the servicing of automobile loan contracts includeprocedures 2, 3 and 4 of section I – Custodial Bank Accounts,procedures 1, 2, 3 and 4 of section III – Disbursements, andprocedures 2, 3 and 4 of section V – Mortgage LoanAccounting.

As of and for the same period, American HondaFinance Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount of$20,000,000 and errors and omissions policy in the amount of$1,000,000.

/s/ Y. TakahashiY.TakahashiPresident

/s/ JonNomuraJon NomuraDirector ofSecuritization

June  9,2006

----
[4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O~'CURHE~CES OlJ1'lNGSVMIIOL Federal AviatioD Administration 

### 11[p-1. D. 14CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2009-0649j Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-218-AD; Amendme 

# 39~0*f.t-fD ~-**-**l
, 20/0-0fo-01 IUN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Admjnistration (FAA), Department ofTranspOl1atiotl NlTlAl.5'S<"

(DOT). I \'\ 10 mU'1 NGS MllOl ACTION: FinallUle. INI1'IAL.S,'S,c; SUMMARY: We are adopting anew aim'orthiness directive (AD) fortheproducts lis edC 

## r..t.r-- DATE

condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

This condition, ifnot corrected, could result in enoneous interpretation of TCAS Resolution Advisories, Jeading to an increased risk ofmid-air collision.


## * * * * * * above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) -z-.f) 

# If 0 •.•.• ROI)l1XG"'''"01_ originated by an aviation authority ofanother country la identify and C01Tect an unsafe 

## '",TlA~~)

Two incidents [ofnear mid-air collision] have occulTed on Airbus A320 Family aircraft during [a] Resolution Advisory [from the] Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TeAS). One ofthe Human-Machine Interface (H1v1I)

factors was the lackofvisibility ofrelevant information on the Primary Flight Display (PFD).

"OUTING SYMI101. We are issuing this AD to require actions to conect the unsafe condition onthese l~rTI>IlSISIG products.
No. 57138.

protests 945354-G, etc. (New York).

#### Orleans Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

*375Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Majestic Oil & Gas Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
Montalban, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Patrick Montalban
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

APRIL 1, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1210

RICHARD LEE BAGBY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior 

District Judge. (3:09-cv-00547-RLW)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lee Bagby, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Lee Bagby appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his complaint for failure to pay the statutory filing 

fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Bagby v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 3:09-cv-00547-RLW 

(E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30,
2008 of Provision Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curt Thornton, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      October 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Curt
      ThorntonChief
      Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board,
              President
      and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
H. J. Res. 72

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Granting the consent of the Congress to the Red River Boundary Compact.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL CONSENT.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The consent of Congress is given to the

Red River Compact entered into between the States of Texas and

Oklahoma and the new boundary established by the compact.

(b) NEW COMPACT.—The compact referred to in subsection (a)

sets the boundary between the States of Texas and Oklahoma

as the vegetation line on the south bank of the Red River (except

for the Texoma area where the boundary is established pursuant

to procedures provided for in the compact) and is the compact—

(1) agreed to by the State of Texas in House Bill 1355

approved by the Governor of Texas on May 24, 1999; and

(2) agreed to by the State of Oklahoma in Senate Bill

175 approved by the Governor of Oklahoma on June 4, 1999.

(c) COMPACT.—The Acts referred to in subsection (b) are recognized by Congress as an interstate compact pursuant to section

10 of Article I of the United States Constitution.

(d) CONSTRUCTION.—The compact shall not in any manner

alter—

(1) any present or future rights and interests of the Kiowa,

Comanche, and Apache Tribes, the Chickasaw Nation, and

the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and their members or Indian

successors-in interest;

(2) any tribal trust lands;

(3) allotted lands that may be held in trust or lands subject

to a Federal restriction against alienation;

(4) any boundaries of lands owned by the tribes and nations

referred to in paragraph (1), including lands referred to in

paragraphs (2) and (3), that exist now or that may be established in the future under Federal law; and

(5) the sovereign rights, jurisdiction, or other governmental

interests of the Kiowa, Comanche, and Apache Tribes, the

Chickasaw Nation, and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and

their members or Indian successors-in interest presently

existing or which may be acknowledged by Federal and tribal

law.
H. J. Res. 72—2

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This joint resolution shall take effect on August 31, 2000.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 227

Expressing the sense of the Congress that special recognition should be

given to the observance of Veterans Day on November 11, 1999, the

last Veterans Day of the 20th century, as an opportunity to promote

greater appreciation, especially among children, of the sacrifices made

by America’s veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

Mr. SWEENEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that special recognition

should be given to the observance of Veterans Day on

November 11, 1999, the last Veterans Day of the 20th

century, as an opportunity to promote greater appreciation, especially among children, of the sacrifices made

by America’s veterans.

Whereas Veterans Day, formerly known as Armistice Day,

was first proclaimed by President Woodrow Wilson in

1919 to commemorate the November 11, 1918, armistice

between the Allies and Central Powers that ended the

fighting of World War I;

Whereas each year, at 11:00 a.m. on November 11th, the Nation pays tribute to its war dead with a combined color
2

•HCON 227 IH

guard representing all military services that executes

‘‘Present Arms’’ at the Tomb of the Unknowns in Arlington National Cemetery;

Whereas more than 700,000 brave Americans have sacrificed

their lives while serving in the Nation’s Armed Forces so

that the Nation’s children may continue to live in a country founded on the principles of freedom, justice, and democracy;

Whereas there are more than 25,000,000 United States veterans living today;

Whereas November 11, 1999, will be the last Veterans Day

of the 20th century;

Whereas as America enters a new millennium, it is important

to preserve the memory of the Nation’s veterans and to

teach the next generations of the sacrifice of those veterans in securing and preserving the freedom that all

Americans enjoy today;

Whereas children throughout the Nation would benefit from

an education that places greater emphasis on the role of

members of the Armed Forces in shaping the history of

the United States; and

Whereas such an education would foster a patriotic appreciation of the sacrifices made by America’s veterans in defending freedom and democracy: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) there will be one final time this century on

4 which the Nation will give special recognition to the
3

•HCON 227 IH

1 contributions of its veterans in defending freedom

2 and democracy;

3 (2) the Nation should use that occasion, and

4 other appropriate occasions, to make a greater effort

5 to educate children on the contributions of veterans

6 in defending the freedoms the Nation enjoys so that

7 the memory of those contributions will be preserved

8 into the 21st century; and

9 (3) it is the hope of the Congress that the new

10 millennium will bring with it a diminished need to

11 sacrifice the lives of young Americans in the cause

12 of securing and preserving freedom.

Æ
### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Record of Meeting

DATE: March 10, 2016

EPA ATTENDEES: Guy Donaldson, Mark Hanse n, Dayana Medina, Ba rbara Nann, Adaobi

Nwanko

VISITORS: Stuart Spencer (ADEQ), Will Mont gomery (ADEQ), Mark McCorkle (ADEQ),

David Clark (ADEQ), T ony Davis (ADEQ), Jeremy Jewell (Trinity), Mark Thimke (Foley &

Lardner), Annabeth Reitter (Domtar), Kelley Crouch (Domtar)

This meeting was in response to a request from th e visitors for an opportunity to meet with EPA

to go over the written comments submitted by Do mtar during the public comment period on the

proposed Arkansas Regional Haze FIP, and to answer any questions from EPA regarding the

submitted comments (see attached Meeting Age nda). Domtar also informed EPA that Power

Boiler No. 1 was recently converted to burn only natural gas and that the company has submitted

to ADEQ a permit renewal application that will reflect the fuel conversion. Domtar’s written

comments are found in the docket for the Arkans as RH FIP rulemaking (Docket ID: EPA–R06–

OAR–2015–0189).

The topics discussed included the following:

 Status of EPA’s work on the Arkansas RH FIP, including timing of the final FIP.

 Domtar Ashdown Mill Power Boiler No. 1 has been converted to burn only natural gas

(see attached March 8, 2016 le tter provided by Domtar).

 FIP compliance schedule for Power Boiler No. 2 and the impact to the mill’s

competitiveness; overview/update on Do mtar’s fluff pulp conversion project.

 Consent order approach for ADEQ to s ubmit a SIP revision to address BART

requirements for the Domtar Ashdown Mill Power Boilers Nos. 1 and 2.

 EPA’s proposed SO2 BART limit for Power Boiler No. 2.MEETING AGENDA

DOMTAR ASHDOWN MILL BART DISCUSSION

EPA Region 6 and Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality, Dallas, TX

March 10, 2016

1:00 p.m.

 Introductions

 Status of the EPA Regional Haze FIP for Arkansas

o Timing for the final FIP

o Any updates on an Arkansas Regional Haze SIP approach

 FIP Compliance Schedule for Power Boiler #2 and impact to mill’s competitiveness

o Overview and update on fluff pulp conversion project

o Need a 5

‐ year compliance schedule versus proposed 3

‐ year compliance period

 3

‐ year timeline problematic with transformation project

 Extra time needed to assess mill steam demands in mill transformed state

 Consent order approach for addressing Ashdown Mill Regional Haze requirements

o Opportunity under existing State Regional Haze approved SIP?

o Other approaches

 Other concerns with the Proposed FIP

o Proposed SO2 BART Limit for Power Boiler #2

 Calculation methodology

 Baseline used for determining the limit

o Need for off

‐ ramps if BART requirements no longer apply

 Next Steps
----

| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),      and, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  March      31, 2009 | /s/ Robert DeMeulemeester    |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                  | Robert      DeMeulemeester   |   |
|                                  | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 2192

DAWN PERLMUTTER; THOMAS M. BOLICK , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. TRINA VARONE; JEFFREY VARONE; SCOTT PERLMUTTER; GARY ALTMAN; ALTMAN & ASSOCIATES; SUTTON INVESTMENTS LLC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paula Xinis , District Judge. ( 8:19

- cv - 03402

- PX )

Submitted : March 30, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dawn Perlmutter, Thomas M. Bolick, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order s granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss, denying Appellants’ motion for reconsideration, and denying Appellants’ motion for recusal . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perlmutter v. Varone , No.
8:19

- cv - 03402

- PX (D. Md. June 1, 2020; Oct. 13, 2020)

. We further reject Appellants’ contention that 4th Cir. R. 46(f) is unconstitutional and note that we have full y considered the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED