alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
/,---,'"',

# r;vcompa~s <**,~·-** 

### AIrimes

April 22, 2013 SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED U.S. Dept. ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Compass Airlines, LLC 11!11 !t**~** 

### ,LU J n. ; -'**~** :

Request for Extension of Exemption 94968

.Docket Number F AA-2007-28967

• • I , '."? ;,.-\ t ,.-..,\**~'** ! ·:**~** J To Whom It May Concern: James M. White Director, Operations Compass Airlines, Inc. 7500 Airline Dr., Ste 130 Minneapolis, MN 55450 Mike.White@compassairline.com 612.713.6891-0 314.497.9836- 

### c

Please acdept- this letter as a request for an extension of Exemption No: 94968 (as'amended) from 14 CFR Part 121.434(c), which is set to expire on September 30, 2013. This exemption allows Compass to substitute a qualified and authorized check airmari or· aircrew prbgram designee· fori an FAA in!Spebtor to

### observ~ _a qualifying pilot in command'(PIC)'who is conW:>·Ieting'ihitial6r upgtadetraining S:p·ecifi'ed.in;§'·121:424'' 1 ' 1 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing. Since the time of the exemption, Compass has abided by the conditions and limitations described therein and the exem'ption has 

## hot previously been' superseded 

# or 'rescinded! An ·extension oUhis ( exemption ls'·ilecessary toCo'mpas's'operatio'ri:!Any lapse ofthe exemption ·will result'irl sigriifica'nt delays'·Jn tompas;s,; piloHrairiing program,· which Will result in significant '
.. delays that Will affect the entirety of Compass' operations..
. · Further, Compass does not seek to change the conditions and limitations of the current exemption which was originally granted in September 2007. This exemption has be.en in use for over six years with no compromises of safety. The renewal of this exemption Is not'a' controversial) issue:'The existence of the exemption is well known and widely accepted. For this reason,' a'nd the· ri3asoris stated above, Com'pass requests that 

# afinding ofgood. cause-oe made waiving publication in the Federal Register (14 G.F.R. §1.1.87). !. ": !'.;·.·.. .l;•' ·, ,., .•. • •' "' ;.I , .<• ..,.,, •. ·.J'
.. I : '.( .J
...**~,..·** 'II-!. ' !.
.**,·~.** ';f;
.....**~.** •**~** •• j**.;~·; ~·**  .,: .. , '
.

### Th~nk you for your•c'o•nsideratiori of 6ur'reque·st for exfensioii·:of-'this exemption. Please feel

## Nee'· to contad ni'e ··at 612
..71316891 with any questions or conce11nsJ· ' 11 

### <· :l 1,
......**~--·** ·: •• • •**~-.''.··~~ t~·~;** ..**_i(.~C',.._-:.;q:·!;·:;.;:~·**

• j ; __ ,,

James M. White , _., .,**.··~.** i.l,**~** : .: I ;**~** .\ ' : : "'; ' I'(·.

. l. \.**·~** .. '
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6650

REUBEN GARRISON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

F. W. GREENE, Warden; E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER;

ALL AGENTS OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-98-399-3)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 16, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reuben Garrison, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Reuben Garrison appeals the district courts order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Garrison v.

Greene, No. CA-98-399-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03532

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 100 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 100

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 27, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To establish designations for United States Postal Service buildings in 
                      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROXANNE H. JONES POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Postal Service building located 
at 2601 North 16th Street, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Roxanne H. Jones Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roxanne H. 
Jones Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. FREEMAN HANKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Postal Service building located 
at 5300 West Jefferson Street, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Freeman Hankins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Freeman 
Hankins Post Office Building''.

SEC. 3. MAX WEINER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Postal Service building located 
at 2037 Chestnut Street, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Max Weiner Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Max Weiner 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.5

                       [MORTEN BEYER & AGNEW LETTERHEAD]

December 22, 1999

America West Airlines, Inc.
4000 E. Sky Harbor Boulevard
Phoenix, Arizona 85034-3899

Re:  America West Airlines, Inc.
     Pass Through Certificates, Series 1999-1

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We Consent to the reference to our name in the text under the headings
"Risk Factors - Risk Factors Relating to the Certificates and the Exchange Offer
- Possible Effects if Aircraft Appraisals do not Correspond to the Realizable
Value of Aircraft," "Description of the Aircraft and the Appraisals - The
Appraisals", "Experts" and "Appendix II - Appraisal Letters" in the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We also consent to the inclusion in the Registration Statement of the report
prepared by us with respect to the Aircraft referred to therein.

Sincerely,



/s/ Teo Ozdener

Teo Ozdener
Vice President - Technical


                                      S-4
Exhibit 23.3



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                       |  | 
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Fifth Avenue Place                                                                                   
|     |  |  |  |  |  | 600, 425  1 Street SW Calgary AB T2P 3L8 Canada
 Tel: 403-648-3200 Fax: 403-265-0862 www.deloitte.ca

February 28, 2012

Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation

777 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 650

Houston, Texas 77056

Dear Sirs/Mesdames:



|RE: | LETTER OF CONSENT
|--- | -----------------

As independent
petroleum consultants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-166756, 333-168161, 333-172979, 333-173757, 333-174879 and 333-177486), in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No.
333-173415) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-168802, 333-169814, 333-171168 and 333-177488) of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, and in each of the prospectuses, of information relating to our report setting forth the
estimates of the oil and gas reserves and revenues from the oil and gas reserves of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation as of December 31, 2011, and to the inclusion of our report, in the form and context in which it appears, in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K and to all references to our firm included in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/S/    BARRY R. ASHTON                
|Barry R. Ashton, P.Eng.
Senior Manager



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/S/    JEFF KEEBLE                                
|Jeff Keeble, CA, CBV
Partner Deloitte & Touche
LLP
|                                                  
|Calgary, Alberta, Canada
No. 61693.

#### Skins Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 310163-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to *490that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust, Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
A

ARTHUR GROSS AND GLORIA

GROSS

VERSUS

THE SPINE HOSPITAL OF

LOUISIANA, THE NEUROMEDICAL

CENTER, APMC AND SCOTT W. 

SOLEAU, M. D. 

CIRCUIT

NO. 2023 CW 0843

SEPTEMBER 41 2023

In Re: Scott W. Soleau, M. D. and The NeuroMedical Center, 

APMC, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial

District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

6S2, 311. 

IT GRANTED. The district court' s

ruling which denied

defendants' motion to qualify Dr. Nageeb Thomas and which

disqualified him from testifying in this matter is reversed. 

See Medine v. Roniger, 2003- 3436 ( La. 7/ 2/ 04), 879 So. 2d 706, 

712, holding that medical review panelists are allowed to

testify on behalf of a party as paid experts. Moreover, 

generally, bias does not preclude a party' s

qualification as an

expert, because the potential bias of the witness may be

explored on cross- examination. Pelts & Skins Export, Ltd. v. 

State of Louisiana through the Department of Wildlife & 

Fisheries, 97- 2300 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 4/ 1/ 99), 735 So. 2d 116, 

writs denied, 99- 2036, 99- 2042 ( La. 10/ 29/ 99), 748 So. 2d 1167, 

1168. 

9

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT_ 

FOR THE COURT
Before the Third Division,

June 8, 1964

No. 68615.

protests 323044-K, 323045-K, and 323046-K (New York).

#### National Lead Co. *v.*United States,

*370Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of antimony briquettes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *National Lead Co.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 13, C.D. 2407), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
+

1 ^,.

..•ad^id^m

Ji£ppU-^4pta^^^ciJ^^^

Fll/EDI 24£/_

^MA^-..

RECBVEDIN CSURTOF-eRIMINAUAP-PJAlA

^^Aco^ta,ClerK
•^

i\

TM0W W< FFstfER CAUSE to f37*fe,

TO TW£ How^Bta 3b(&£0F£AiD COUfo-;

Combs *»ow iTHorvy Fisher (t>Ef&>t>mi)pRD-SE m-nte a&me

ST/IJE NOMB£F( O&SE Mb SITES'.

fi£FENMJT 'S Rfi3U£3TltfS mRATlrtZOF BXTEtiSkM to && ABLE

TP Fim PdR B8r£p"ro cc>», court due to His Lfck of Knc^tem

Also $y m Bern pro-sb oub to the mr Ms i-Awm Pnowm By

THE STATE THAT FILED HlS DIRECT ytftBL dorr HIS 35$ M LEFT

Thw mfmmrr unpkeP/$b> n& Aty; FURwm lb&v- Pfl>m wo$c

A* aue to the fact im t>EFmt>Mr <s cu^E^Tty pl^qe/> wtm^9t=-

O^fRFLaW ON ^ <^7 tpc/( Mkf fir the OWS V'AV*& UWfT MTM^T

Hb h/&?t Be®* ablb Tt> &b PWim wrm awurn umvyvriB

id be /^e -jgf prnmi-y' mPMk to e^e#4Ai fb« t«cs6/^s<jk»sw^

I RECEIVED i

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON. TEXAS '

OCT 1 2 Z015

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK.

W TH6 W— OF- J2£L Mm -W8EHBM& BYWf "WE

0EF^Ni>/»ms warm m Extensa &TmG:M tr Appfflfts w 1H£Wmr

THE MOTotf SfewU> BW 6Wte ,. p^Ntefe—^—^ Att>lTt$S0 ORDERED

uubmFRBsmm
No. 61696.

#### Colin Douglas *v.*United States,

protests 5476-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 13

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative

to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections for Federal

and State office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relative to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections for Federal and State office.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

HJ 13 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress shall have power to set reason3 able limits on expenditures made in support of or in oppo4 sition to the nomination or election of any person to Fed5 eral office.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. Each State shall have power to set rea7 sonable limits on expenditures made in support of or in

8 opposition to the nomination or election of any person to

9 State office.

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to enforce

11 this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1




[LETTERHEAD OF MADSEN & ASSOCIATES CPA’S, INC.]
    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
 of BigString Corporation
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-135180 on Form S-8 of BigString Corporation of our report dated April 13, 2011 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BigString Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the period October 8, 2003 (Date of Formation) through December 31, 2010, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BigString Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.
   /s/ Madsen & Associates CPA’s, Inc.
 
 Madsen & Associates CPA’s, Inc.
 Certified Public Accountants
 
 April 13, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL CROSSEY, DWAYNE THOMAS, 

IRVIN WEINREICH, BRENDA WEINREICH, 

AND THE PENNSYLVANIA ALLIANCE FOR 

RETIRED AMERICANS,

Petitioners

v.

KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH, AND JESSICA 

MATHIS, DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF 

ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 108 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2020, the petitions of Proposed Intervenors 

President Pro Tempore Joseph B. Scarnati, III, and Majority Leader of the State Senate 

Jake Corman; Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Turzai and Majority Leader 

of the House Bryan Cutler (subsequently substituted by Speaker of the House of 

Representatives Bryan Cutler and Majority Leader of the House Kerry Benninghoff) to 

intervene in this matter are GRANTED; the petitions of Proposed Intervenors Republican 

Party of Pennsylvania, the Republican National Committee, and the National Republican 

Congressional Committee are DENIED, without prejudice to their ability to file briefs as 

amicus curiae pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 531.

Chief Justice Saylor files a concurring and dissenting statement in which Justice 

Mundy joins.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Fuego Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugo M. Cancio,
      in
      my capacity as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




**Fuego
                Entertainment, Inc.**Date:
                April 18, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Hugo M. CancioHugo
                M. Cancio
              Principal
                Executive Officer
No. 52455.

protests 734699-G, etc. (New York).

#### American Straw Goods Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tílson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 51531.

#### Protests 125446-K, etc., of S. Toepfer, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 66118.

#### Arthur Salm, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/25143-11061 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion hammers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arthur Salm, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 2235), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Opinion issued August 13, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 9
- 00 454
- CV

——————————— IN RE BESTEX MANAGEMENT CO MPANY, LLC , Relator

O rigi n al Proceeding on Petition f o r Writ o f Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Bestex Management Company, LLC , has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order granting a motion to compel third

- party discovery from relator. 1 Relator, representing that the real parties in inte rest, Raju

1 The underlying case is Raju Patel and Arun Parikh v. Vishu T. Bhambhani, Individually and as President and M anaging Partner of Corsicana Hospitality, Inc., et al. , Cause No. 201 6

- 2 71 9 3 , in the 11 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Kris ten Brauchle Hawkins presiding.2

Patel and Aru n Parikh , ha ve “nonsuited all causes of action to which the relief sought in [relator’s] petition for mandamus might apply , ” has filed a motion requesting that we dismiss the petition without prejudice

. W e grant the motion and dismiss the petition without prejudice. And we dismiss relator’s request for emergency relief as moot

. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Landau, and Countiss

.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 116

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 24, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by strik4 ing the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting

5 ‘‘October 27, 2000’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50627

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS CASTILLO, also known as Jorge

Adolfo DeLeon, also known as Jesus Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-415-1-DB

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Castillo appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Castillo argues that his sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a). Castillo acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 
No. 00-50627

- 2 -

Castillo’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523

U.S. at 235. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.