alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.2    
    


 
 

PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST    
    
    AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT
  AS AMENDED AND RESTATED DECEMBER 16, 1997    
    


        The undersigned trustees of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust on this            day
of                        ,            , hereby amend the Trust
Agreement as amended and restated December 16, 1997 (the "Agreement") as follows: 


        1.    Rights of Series or Class of Preferred Shares to Elect
Trustees.    Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following new Paragraph 2.L.: 



        "L.
The provisions of this Paragraph 2 are subject to the rights of the holders of any series or class of Preferred Shares to elect or appoint or to cause the election or
appointment of one or more Trustees upon the terms and conditions set forth in the designating Amendment to this Agreement effected by the Trustees with respect to the applicable series or class of
Preferred Shares." 




        2.    Allocations.    Paragraph 8 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the
following sentence immediately following the last sentence of the second paragraph thereof: 


        "The
Shares shall be subject to all of the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the Preferred Shares as set forth in the designating Amendment
to this Agreement effected by the Trustees with respect to the applicable series or class of Preferred Shares." 



        3.     All
capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, which terms and conditions the undersigned trustees hereby ratify and confirm. This Amendment may be executed and delivered in one or more
counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement. 







        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned trustees have executed and delivered this Amendment, or caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered as of the date first set forth above. 


TRUSTEES:




	
 Rosemarie B. Greco	 	
 Lee H. Javitch
	

 Leonard I. Korman	
 	

 Ira M. Lubert
	

 Jeffrey P. Orleans	
 	

 George F. Rubin
	

 Ronald Rubin	
 	

 Jonathan B. Weller
	

 John J. Roberts	
 	

 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.2


PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT AS AMENDED AND RESTATED DECEMBER 16, 1997
##### 



Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended January 31, 2007, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January
31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
    /s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenActing Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
 44
Before the Third Division,

October 22, 1953

No. 57556.

#### Hugh C. Edmiston *v.*United States,

protests 135763-K, etc. (New York).

*271Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of china figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

Kordzi, Joe

From: Carl Weilert <cweilert@aol.com>

Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 2:04 PM

To: Kordzi, Joe

Subject: Power Engineering Article about Utility FGD Design Trends

Attachments: Utility_FGD_Design_Trends_Article.pdf

Joe: 

 

I think this one should go through OK. 

Let me know if it does not. 

 

Carl Weilert
Before the First Division,

January 10, 1946

No. 50809.

#### Petition 6506-R of P. J. McEvoy, Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Two witnesses testified for the petitioner that the fabrics in question are used in the manufacture of religious habits, a class of material never carried in stock and which always requires from 4 to 7 months to be made ready for shipment; that the shipments under consideration were purchased when the market was steadily advancing, so admittedly prices for the instant merchandise had materially increased between the date of purchase and the time of shipment; that before making any of the entries involved herein, petitioner and the customs broker discussed the matter of values' with customs officials, petitioner contending that the purchase price should be the proper basis for appraisement, and the appraiser insisting upon the values prevailing at the time of exportation of the merchandise. Appeals for reappraisement were filed which were suspended pending decision in a test case, ultimately decided in favor of the Government’s contention *(White Lamb Finlay, Inc.*v. *United States,*29 C. C. P. A. 199, C. A. D. 192). It was held that the record is convincing that there was an honest difference of opinion between the parties, and that there was no attempt to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the true value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 103

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 402(c)

of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 2000

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. HUNTER, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained

in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect

to the People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress does not approve the extension of the au4 thority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to Congress on June

6 2, 2000, with respect to the People’s Republic of China.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 50 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.50
                                        Agreed to April 14, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On June 11, 1999, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 1999 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this concurrent resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as 
part of the journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of 
Columbia Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the 
District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for 
physical preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, and 
solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
No. 56891.

#### Freund-Mayer & Co., Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 159069-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

Paper napkins stipulated to be similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474) were held dutiable at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 1413, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for paper, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into shapes. Other items of the merchandise stipulated to consist of manufactures of paper wadding or manufactures of pulp wadding the same as importations which are currently being classified as manufactures of paper wadding or pulp wadding, pursuant to the provision therefor in paragraph 1404, as modified by T. D. 51802, were held dutiable under said paragraph at 6 cents per pound and 7H percent ad valorem.
# CHAPTER 2 Issue Category: Under What Conditions Will Federal Standards be Either Not Finalized or Withdrawn Page 4446 Response to Public Comments Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Lakes and Flowing Waters November 14, 2010 40 CFR Part 131 Docket #: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596 This document is part of a larger documentChapter 2 - Comment Documents Under What Conditions Will Federal Standards Be Either Not Finalized or Withdrawn? IV - UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS WILL FEDERAL STANDARDS BE EITHER NOT FINALIZED OR WITHDRAWN? No Comments are Applicable to this Issue Category, and Thus No Response is Necessary.

11/19/2010 02:48 PM EST 2-4446
January 3, 1949

No. 52802.

Suit 4606.

#### Olavarria & Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1110. (Appeal dismissed November 12, 1948.)
H. J. Res. 34

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Joint Resolution

Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Whereas the organization now known as the Veterans of Foreign

Wars of the United States was founded in Columbus, Ohio, on

September 29, 1899;

Whereas the VFW represents approximately 2,000,000 veterans

of the Armed Forces who served overseas in World War I, World

War II, Korea, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf War, and Bosnia;

and

Whereas the VFW has, for the past 100 years, provided voluntary

and unselfish service to the Armed Forces and to veterans,

communities, States, and the Nation and has worked toward

the betterment of veterans in general and society as a whole:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the

Congress—

(1) recognizes the historic significance of the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the

United States (the VFW);

(2) congratulates the VFW on achieving that milestone;

(3) commends the approximately 2,000,000 veterans who

belong to the VFW and thanks them for their service to their

fellow veterans and the Nation; and

(4) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation recognizing the anniversary of the VFW and the contributions made

by the VFW to veterans and the Nation and calling upon

the people of the United States to observe such anniversary

with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
H. J. Res. 126

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘December 7, 2000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>   1
                        AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                         (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE
                                    AMOUNTS)                        EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                                MARCH 31,
                                                                                          1998             1997
                                                                                          ---------------------

Basic Earnings Per Share:
<S>                                                                                  <C>               <C>
   Net income applicable to common stock .....................................       $    25,138       $    13,954
                                                                                     ===========       ===========

   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ......................        44,001,533        44,440,133
                                                                                     ===========       ===========

   Basic earnings per share ..................................................       $      0.57       $      0.31
                                                                                     ===========       ===========

   Diluted Earnings Per Share:

   Net income applicable to common stock .....................................       $    25,138       $    13,954
                                                                                     ===========       ===========

Share Computation:
   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ......................        44,001,533        44,440,133
   Assumed exercise of stock options and warrants (a) ........................         3,854,767         1,886,556
                                                                                     -----------       -----------

   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding as adjusted ..........        47,856,300        46,326,689
                                                                                     ===========       ===========

   Diluted earnings per share ................................................       $      0.53       $      0.30
                                                                                     ===========       ===========
</TABLE>

(a)        The stock options and warrants are included only in the periods in
           which they are dilutive.




                                       19
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PETER KOSTYSHYN,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF WILMINGTON, a 

Municipal Corporation of the State 

of Delaware,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 309, 2022

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N18J-02078

§ 

§

§

§

§

Submitted: November 4, 2022

Decided: November 15, 2022

ORDER

The appellant filed a notice of appeal in this matter on August 30, 2022, and 

an amended notice of appeal on September 23, 2022. On September 23, 2022, the 

Senior Court Clerk sent the appellant a letter directing him to pay the filing fee or to 

file a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis by October 11, 2022, or a 

notice to show cause would issue. The Senior Court Clerk sent another letter to the 

appellant on October 11, 2022, notifying him of the requirement that he pay the filing 

fee or file a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. The appellant 

submitted various filings and correspondence to the Court between September 23 

and October 12, but did not pay the filing fee or file a motion and affidavit to proceed 

in forma pauperis. On October 18, 2022, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, 
2

sent by certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should 

not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or to file a motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis. Correspondence from the Senior Court Clerk to the appellant on 

October 21, 2022, also notified the appellant that the notice to show cause had been 

issued on October 18, 2022, and that no action would be taken on any further filings 

by the appellant until the notice to show cause was resolved. On October 27, 2022, 

the Court received the certified-mail receipt indicating that the notice to show caused 

was delivered on October 24, 2022. The appellant having failed to respond to the 

notice to show cause within the required ten-day period, dismissal of this action is 

deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24145]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 2, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 20, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
83 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-23, CP2024-23.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24145 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Before the Third Division,

March 31, 1959

No. 62928.

#### Park & Tilford Distillers Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 307984-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 69380.

#### Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Markand Thakar et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/12982, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66656, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 59400.

protests 208460-K and 209831-K (New York).

#### Getz Bros. *&*Co., Inc., and G. J. Kluyskens *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57889, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Frank W. Gay II, certify that:



|Date: April 29, 2004 |  | /s/FRANK W. GAY IIFrank W. Gay II
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Leslie M. Brown, Jr., certify that:



|Date: April 29, 2004 |  | /s/LESLIE M. BROWN, JR.Leslie M. Brown, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 303 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 303

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2000

  Mr. Armey submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, April 
13, 2000, or Friday, April 14, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 2, 2000, for morning-
hour debate, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified 
to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Thursday, April 13, 2000, or Friday, April 
14, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by 
its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned 
until noon on Tuesday, April 25, 2000, or such time on that day as may 
be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```