alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00236

- CV

PHYLLIS NICHOLAS APPELLANT

V.

FANNIE MAE A/K/A FED ERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------


### ME MORANDUM OPINION 1

----------

On March 27, 2012 , we notified Appellant Phyllis Nicholas that h er brief did

not comply with appellate rule of procedure 38.1(d), (g), and (i)

. 2 We allowed

Appellant until April 9 , 2012 to file an amended brief that complied w ith the above

rule. We stated in our letter to Appellant that h er failure to timely file an amended

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(d), (g ), ( i)

.2

brief in compliance with the above rule could result in the waiver of noncom pliant

points, our striking h er brief, or the dismissal of h er appeal. 3 We gra nted Appellant

an extension of more than six weeks to file her compliant amended brief, ordering

the amended brief to be filed by May 22, 2012 and stating that no further extensions

would be granted. We received Appellant’s amended brief on May 22, 2012

, but it

too was noncompliant 4 and therefore not filed by this court

. Accordingly, we strike Appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution. 5

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 14, 2012

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), (c).

4 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(d), (g), (i).

5 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), (c).
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
    
 
   
                        INDEPENDENT APPRAISER'S CONSENT
    
 
   
The Boards of Directors of
    
   
Ugly Duckling Corporation and
    
   
  Cygnet Financial Corporation:
    
 
   
     We have reviewed and approved the summary of our appraisal report referred
to in the Cygnet Financial Corporation prospectus and to the reference to our
firm under the headings "Experts," "Prospectus Summary -- The Rights Offering,"
"The Rights Offering -- Opinion of Appraiser," "Federal Income Tax
Consequences," and elsewhere therein.
    
 
   
                                                /s/ WILLAMETTE MANAGEMENT
                                                      ASSOCIATES
    
 
   
San Francisco, California
    
   
July 21, 1998
Case No. 10,344.

#### NORTHWESTERN UNION PACKET CO. v. LOUISIANA.

[4 Dill. 17, note.] 1

Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.

1S7C.

Wharfage Ufes — RateDependent os — Tonnage.

[See Cases Nos. 10.342. 10,343, and 10.34G.]

By ns charter the city of Louisiana has power to erect public wharves, and fix' the rates of wharfage thereat. The rates of wharfage for steamboats and boats in tow are fixed by section 3 of an ordinance of said city of Louisiana, in relation to the wharf, etc., entitled, “An ordinance in relation to the wharf; regulating the duties of city marshal, ex-officio wharf master, and prescribing and fixing the rates of wharf-age.” approved February 10, 1S67, as follows: “Section 3. There shall be charged and collected from each and every steamboat, water-craft. raft, or float, landing at or touching the landing, and delivering or receiving any freight or passengers, within the corporate limbs of the city, the following sums as wharfage, to wit: First. All steamboats landing and delivering or receiving freight or passengers, shall be charged and pay as wharfage three dollars for each and every landing, whether ascending or descending.” The action is to recover back wharfage tax paid in 1870. 1871, and 1S72, under written protest. Tlie plaintiff’s boats used the improved wharf made by the city. If the tax is legal, it is admitted that the amount is reasonable. [See Case No. 10,345.]

Duncan & Davidson, for plaintiff.

Dyer & Emmons, for defendant.

Before DILLON, Circuit Judge, and TREAT. District Judge.

TREAT, District Judge.

The ordinance of the city of Louisiana covers the entire corporate limits of that city; and, if the plaintiff had paid the so-called wharfage for landing where there was no artificial or improved wharf, there might be ground of complaint. But the fact is that the plaintiff’s boats chose to take the benefit of tlie improved wharf, built at the expense of tlie city, when it was well known what compensation was required for such use. The rates were not made dependent on tonnage. Judgment for defendant.
Before the First Division,

May 14, 1964

No. 68548.

protests 63/14549 and 63/15722 (Boston).

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00437-CV

__________________

ALEXANDRIA MONIC GREEN, Appellant

V.

CHANNING THOMAS GREEN AND OFFICE OF THE TEXAS 

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 317th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-238,683

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 29, 2022, Alexandria Monic Green, Appellant, appealed from 

a final decree of divorce in Trial Cause Number C-238,683. After perfecting her 

appeal, however, Appellant failed to file a brief.

On May 23, 2023, we notified the parties that Appellant had not filed a brief 

and that her appeal would be submitted without briefs unless, by June 2, 2023, we 

received a brief in her appeal together with a motion to extend the time to file her
2

brief. We also warned Appellant that her appeal could be dismissed for want of 

prosecution if the appeal was submitted without briefs. On June 15, 2023, we 

notified the parties that the appeal would be submitted on July 6, 2023, without briefs 

and without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. 

In the absence of a brief assigning error for our review, we dismiss the appeal 

for want of prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 6, 2023

Opinion Delivered July 20, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
# Official Journal L 217/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 217 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 664 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 217

English edition

Legislation

Volume 664 September 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1682 of 29 June 2023 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt as a feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation: Taminco BV) and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1683 of 26 July 2022 on the measure SA.26494 2012/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of the operator of La Rochelle airport and certain airlines operating at that airport
  (notified under document C(2022) 5145)

   (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1684 of 31 August 2023 concerning certain interim emergency measures relating to African swine fever in Italy
  (notified under document C(2023) 5984)

   (
  1
  ) | 123 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1682 of 29 June 2023 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt as a feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation: Taminco BV) and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 (
  1
  )

1

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1683 of 26 July 2022 on the measure SA.26494 2012/C (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of the operator of La Rochelle airport and certain airlines operating at that airport
  (notified under document C(2022) 5145)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 5145)

1

5

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1684 of 31 August 2023 concerning certain interim emergency measures relating to African swine fever in Italy
  (notified under document C(2023) 5984)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2023) 5984)

1

123

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1999

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H. Gray

as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Dr. Hanna H. Gray

8 of Illinois on April 11, 1999, is filled by the reappointment
2

HJ 27 RDS

1 of the incumbent for a term of six years, effective April

2 12, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 34 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

      Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Whereas the organization now known as the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United 
        States was founded in Columbus, Ohio, on September 29, 1899;
Whereas the VFW represents approximately 2,000,000 veterans of the Armed Forces 
        who served overseas in World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the 
        Persian Gulf War, and Bosnia; and
Whereas the VFW has, for the past 100 years, provided voluntary and unselfish 
        service to the Armed Forces and to veterans, communities, States, and 
        the Nation and has worked toward the betterment of veterans in general 
        and society as a whole: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 100th 
        anniversary of the founding of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of 
        the United States (the VFW);
            (2) congratulates the VFW on achieving that milestone;
            (3) commends the approximately 2,000,000 veterans who 
        belong to the VFW and thanks them for their service to their 
        fellow veterans and the Nation; and
            (4) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation 
        recognizing the anniversary of the VFW and the contributions 
        made by the VFW to veterans and the Nation and calling upon the 
        people of the United States to observe such anniversary with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SafetyProducts Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: | March 13, 2008 | By:                                             | /s/ Robert A. Peterson |
|--------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|   |                | Robert A. Peterson                              |
|   |                | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|   |                | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 71 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.71

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 106-62 is amended by striking ``October 21, 1999'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``October 29, 1999''. Notwithstanding section 106 of 
Public Law 106-62, funds shall be available and obligations for 
mandatory payments due on or about November 1, 1999, may continue to be 
made.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case No. 10,330.

#### NORTH SHORE STATEN ISLAND FERRY CO. v. The HUGUENOTS.1

District Court, D. New York.

April 1, 1863.

Damaqes roit Collision — Detention for Repairs — Interest—Commissioner’s Report.

1. The owner of a vessel damaged by collision may recover for the necessary detention to make repairs when it is made to appear that she could have been profitably chartered or employed during the period of detention. Following Williamson v. Barrett, 13 How. [54 U. S.] 101.

2. He is also entitled to recover interest on the actual cost of the necessary repairs from the time payment therefor was actually made.

3. The report of a commissioner to assess damages in admiralty must be sustained unless it is quite apparent that he has erred.

This was a libel by the North Shore Staten Island Ferry Company against the steamboat Huguenots to recover damages for collision. A decree was heretofore rendered in favor of libelants. Case No. 10,323. The case now comes up on exceptions to the commissioner’s report. The exceptions raised the question whether the libelants could *381recover for the detention of their vessel while being repaired; whether they could recover interest on the amount of repairs; and what amount they should recover.

Clark & Hale, for libelants.

Mr. Williams, for claimants.

1

 [Not previously reported.]

HELD

BY THE COURT (HALL, District Judge):

That the right of a libelant in a cause of damage to recover for the necessary detention of his vessel, if it shall appear that his vessel could have been profitably chartered or employed during such detention, is firmly established. [Williamson v. Barrett] 13 How. [54 U. S.] 101; 2 W. Rob. Adm. 279; 3 W. Rob. Adm. 232. That interest should be allowed on the actual cost of the necessary repairs from the time the payment therefor was actually made. The libelant is entitled to full indemnification for the injury sustained, and interest must be allowed, or he will not receive such indemnification. 2 W. Rob. Adm. 130; [St. John v. Paine] 10 How. [51 U. S.] 573, 574. That as to the sum allowed for repairs, although the evidence for the libelant is not as precise and definite and reliable as it might have been made by keeping a proper and separate account of the particular repairs rendered necessary by the collision, yet that of the claimants is still more unreliable. That as to all questions of fact the report of the commissioner must be sustained, unless it is quite apparent that he has erred. That as to the rate of demurrage, although the libelants’ evidence is not of the most satisfactory character, yet the claimants offered no evidence in contradiction; and, in the absence of ' such evidence, the report should not be disturbed. Exceptions overruled and report confirmed.
No. 56246.

protests 810249-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### The Attorney General as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF HENDERSON CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC.


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) by Henderson Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (Registrant), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





By:

/s/   MILTON S. MCGEE, JR.Milton S. McGee, Jr., CPA President (Chief executive officer)





Date: August 12, 2002





By:

/s/   REBECCA G. TANNERRebecca G. Tanner, CPA Vice
President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer andChief Accounting Officer (Chief financial officer)





Date: August 12, 2002
No. 52121.

protests 904717-G (B), etc. (New York).

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
Before the Third Division,

June 28, 1946

No. 51226.

#### Protests 26288-K, etc., of S. A. Haram et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Little

Tail

Point

Peshtigo

Harbor

Oconto

West

Pensaukee Oconto

SE

Oconto

East

Dyckesville Namur

Little

Sturgeon SW

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

590

PECOR POINT LN

FROG POND RD

CO

H

WY-S

COHWY-S

O

C

O

N

T

O

C

O

MARINETTE

CO

M

A

RIN

E

T

T

E

C

O

O

C

O

N

T

O

C

O

O

C

O

N

T

O

C

O

D

O

O

R

C

O

DOOR

CO

M

A

RIN

E

T

T

E

C

O

Lake

Michigan

Pensaukee Shoal

Oconto

Shoal

000

E

37

58

62

30"

65

66

33 000

63

N

000m

68

31

33

49

38

64

32

66

49

49

000m

000m

4 45'

49

52'

30"

FEET

52'

49

47'

49

49

87°

49

4

N

49

49

30"

49

52'

49

37

40

350

65

2 550 000

69

380

56

000

64

68

35 000m

35

59

59

32 39

61

4

56

67

49

30"

49

44°

47'

45'

62

49

45'

49

4

44° 4

50'

49

4

49

57

50' 47'30" 45'

49

87°

4 4

69

30"

4

4

63

52' E 487°

49

4

38

47'

4

44°

49

FEET

36

30"

57

44°

50'

87°

4

FEET

49

50'

61

4 FEET

49

530

49

2

49

30" 39

4

60

36

OCONTO SE, WI

2013

Expressway Local Connector

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

Secondary Hwy Local Road

WXInterstate Route /. US Route H State Route

OCONTO SE QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

Imagery...............................................NAIP, August 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2013

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1999

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 16T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983 (central

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.12

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

DQ

16T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 34 ́

10 MILS

4° 8 ́

74 MILS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embrex, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Marcuson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 3, 2004



/s/ Randall L. MarcusonRandall L. MarcusonPresident and Chief Executive Officer