alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                              BMC WEST CORPORATION
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share


COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

                             Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                           ----------------------    ----------------------
                           Sept. 30,     Sept. 30,     Sept. 30,      Sept. 30,
                             1996         1995           1996           1995
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
Net income                $4,560,000    $3,396,000    $8,840,000     $6,367,000
Class B preferred stock 
  accretion                   (8,500)       (8,500)      (25,500)       (25,500)
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
Adjusted net income       $4,551,500    $3,387,500    $8,814,500     $6,341,500
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------

Weighted average shares 
  outstanding             11,807,613     9,497,482    10,401,785      9,495,885

Net effect of dilutive 
  stock options based on
  the treasury stock 
  method using average 
  market price               236,521       262,117       247,912        256,742
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
Total common shares and
  equivalents             12,044,134     9,759,659    10,649,697      9,752,627
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------

PRIMARY INCOME PER SHARE  $      .38    $      .35     $     .83     $      .65
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------

COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Adjusted net income       $4,551,500    $3,387,500    $8,814,500     $6,341,500
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
Weighted average shares
  outstanding             11,807,613     9,497,482    10,401,785      9,495,885

Net effect of dilutive 
  stock options based on
  the treasury stock 
  method using the higher
  of quarter-end market
  price or average market
  price                      236,522       262,117       247,912        256,742
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
Total shares and 
  equivalents             12,044,135     9,759,659    10,649,697      9,752,627
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS 
  PER SHARE               $      .38    $      .35    $      .83     $      .65
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
                          ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 117

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking
2

•HJ 117 EH

1 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘October

2 28, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 27,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 117

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only
Real Fyre Gas Logs 

 Outdoor Campfyre 

 Fire Magic Grills 

 American Outdoor Grill 

 Find a Dealer 

RH Peterson sets the standard in quality for grills and gas logs. Find the perfect match for your magic hour. 

Home / Real Fyre / Vented Series / 

Vented Series 

Enjoy the splendor and warmth of a cozy fire with Real-Fyre Gas Logs. 

Charred Series

View Styles 

Designer Series

View Styles 

Vented Series Page 1 of 6

http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented-series/ 11/11/2011
Classic Series

View Styles

Vented Series Page 2 of 6

http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented-series/ 11/11/2011
Vented Series Page 3 of 6

http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented-series/ 11/11/2011
Contemporary Series

View Styles 

Burner Systems

View Styles 

Control Systems

View Styles 

Brands 

 Fire Magic 

 American Outdoor Grill 

 Real Fyre 

 Campfyre 

RHP 

 Register 

 Find a Dealer 

 News 

 About RH Peterson 

 Contact RHP 

Resources 

 Dealer Login 

 Catalogs 

 Find a Dealer 

News 

 KTLA – Grill Masters and Exotic Grilling 

 Saving the Planet- One Propane Flame-Grilled Burger at a Time 

 Whats the Best Grill on the Market? 

 Natural Gas Abundance 

 Natural Gas Prices Decline- Near 8 year lows!!! 

Search 

 

RH Peterson Co. 

 Fire Magic

 Real Fyre

 American Outdoor Grill

 Camp Fyre

Expand

next previous

Search.. Submit Query

Vented Series Page 4 of 6

http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented-series/ 11/11/2011
Close

Previous

0/0 

Next 

Vented Series Page 5 of 6

http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented-series/ 11/11/2011
Vented Series Page 6 of 6

http://www.rhpeterson.com/realfyre/vented-series/ 11/11/2011
DENIED and Opinion Filed December 14, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00467-CV IN RE LSP PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-02738-A MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek Before the Court is relator’s May 17, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus wherein relator challenges the trial court’s order denying relator’s motion to transfer

venue. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires re lator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that rela tor lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition, real parties in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and the reco rd before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion.–2– Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). We also lift the stay issued by this Court’s May 18, 2022 Order.

220467F.P05 / Amanda L. Reichek / AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
(Reap. Dec. 10860)

#### S. Jackson & Son, Inc. (Elof Hansson, Inc.) *v.*United States

Entry No. 1164, etc.

(Decided November 18, 1964)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject. to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published *486in 89 T.D. 197, T.D. 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 Ü.S.O., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.O. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Order entered March 8, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01057-CR

ROY OLIVER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-18595-V

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 5, 2019 second motion for extension of the time to 

file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before 

April 8, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by April 8, 2019, this appeal may be abated for the 

trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

The clerk’s record filed in this appeal does not contain copies of the jury instructions and 

verdicts on both the guilt/innocence and punishment phases of trial. Therefore, we ORDER the 

Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the guilt/innocence and punishment phase jury 

instructions and verdicts.
–2–

We DIRECT the Clerk to transmit a copy of this order to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County 

District Clerk; and to counsel for the parties.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7328** 

DAVID L. FOLTZ, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. John A. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv - 00627

- JAG )

Submitted : January 29, 2015 Decided: February 4, 2015

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. David L. Foltz, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David L. Foltz, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the pri soner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude th at Foltz has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 prese nted in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
No. 64683.

#### Wolf Greenspan & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33287 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D.N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States (48*Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 127 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 127

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2000

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``December 8, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62367.

#### Brenner Bros. Fur Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 104049-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold, & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF SALESLOGIX CORPORATION
 
Opis SupportExpress, Inc., an Arizona subsidiary
 
SalesLogix International, Inc., an Arizona subsidiary
 
SalesLogix Europe Ltd., United Kingdom subsidiary
No. 55749.

protest 169238-K (New York).

#### Bergdorf Goodman Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of 40 umbrellas from case number 22, was not in fact imported. In .accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 40 umbrellas missing from case number 22. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 58390.

protests 136033-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Fred Whitaker Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker*Company, *Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content (T. D. 53159)” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 195 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 195

          Supporting the transition to democracy in Indonesia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1999

  Mr. Gilman submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
          Supporting the transition to democracy in Indonesia.

Whereas the Republic of Indonesia is the world's fourth most populous country, 
        has the world's largest Muslim population, and is the second largest 
        country in East Asia;
Whereas a stable and democratic Indonesia is important to regional and American 
        interests;
Whereas on June 7, 1999, elections were held for the Indonesian People's 
        Representative Assembly (DPR), which, despite some irregularities, were 
        deemed to be free, fair, and transparent according to international and 
        domestic observers;
Whereas over 100 million people--more than 90 percent of Indonesia's registered 
        voters--participated in the election, demonstrating the Indonesian 
        people's interest in democratic processes and principles; and
Whereas Indonesia's People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) convened on October 1, 
        1999, to organize the new government, ratify the results of the August 
        30, 1999, popular consultation in East Timor, and select the next 
        President and Vice President of Indonesia: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of Indonesia on carrying out 
        the first free, fair, and transparent national elections in 44 
        years;
            (2) supports the aspirations of the Indonesian people in 
        pursuing democracy;
            (3) calls upon all Indonesian leaders, political party 
        members, military personnel, and the general public to respect 
        the outcome of the elections;
            (4) calls for the transparent selection of the next 
        President and Vice President as expeditiously as possible under 
        Indonesian law, in order to reduce the impact of continued 
        uncertainty about the country's political, economic, and social 
        stability and to enhance the prospects for the country's 
        economic recovery;
            (5) calls upon all parties to work together to assure a 
        smooth transition to a new government; and
            (6) calls for the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) to 
        ratify the results of the popular consultation in East Timor as 
        expeditiously as possible.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**DateI, E. Todd Whittemore, Executive Vice President of Aurora Loan Services LLC., certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofStructured Asset Investment Loan TrustMortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2005-HE2;Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a  whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and  based on upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; andThe reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:TitleU.S. Bank National Association, as TrusteeSignature1.2.3.4.5.   3/29/2006                                                                                                           /s/ E. Todd Whittemore                                                                                                         Executive Vice PresidentHomeq Servicing Corporation, as ServicerWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer