alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2120

RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-99-272-2-19-AJ) Submitted: December 29, 1999 Decided: February 4, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mortimer M. Weinberg, III, WEINBERG, BROWN & CURTIS, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, John B. Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Arthur J. Fried, General Counsel, Charlotte J. Hardnett, Principal Deputy General Counsel, John M. Sacchetti, Associate General Counsel, Sharon M. Saffron, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on July 9, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on July 12, 1999. It is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Richard Williams appeals the order of the district court granting the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Apfel , No. CA-99- 275-2-19-AJ (D.S.C. July 12, 1999). * There is no merit to Williams’ arguments that the Administrative Law Judge lacked jurisdiction to issue his July 1995 amended decision or that the doctrine of “manifest injustice” applies to Williams’ case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Jaguar Mining, Inc. (the “Company”) is filing with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 2013 (the
“Report”).

I, George Bee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/George Bee                    | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|Name:   George Bee               | 
|Title:   Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date: May 13, 2014               |
[Reference]Ref1=http://flyingcolors.streamsvr.com/flyingcolors-od/headstart-11-22-08-f.wmv?MSWMExt=.asfRef2=http://64.5.32.114:80/flyingcolors-od/headstart-11-22-08-f.wmv?MSWMExt=.asf
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40942 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESSIE A. ALMEIDA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-93-CR-73-3

- - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jessie A. Almeida pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute approximately 490 pounds of marijuana. In this appeal, Almeida argues primarily that the district court erred in denying him a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility. This court accords "great deference" to the sentencing court's "refusal to credit a defendant's acceptance of responsibility." United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 121 (5th Cir. 1995) (internal quotation omitted).No. 97-40942 -2- At sentencing, the district court clearly did not believe Almeida’s assertion that he was simply attempting to help a friend with a broken vehicle. The district court carefully examined the circumstances surrounding the presentence interview and found that Almeida falsely denied his criminal involvement to the probation officer and in the sentencing proceeding. The district court did not clearly err in refusing to adjust Almeida's offense level for acceptance of responsibility. See Vital , 68 F.3d at 121. Almeida also complains that his counsel was not present at the interview with the probation officer referred to by the district court. Almeida does not have a constitutional right to counsel during the presentence interview. United States v. Bounds , 985 F.2d 188, 194 (5th Cir. 1993). Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(b)(2), "[o]n request, the defendant’s counsel is entitled to notice and a reasonable opportunity to attend any interview of the defendant by a probation officer in the course of a presentence investigation." In this case, the probation officer attempted to notify counsel of the interview on the day it was to occur, but was unsuccessful. It is not necessary to determine if this was sufficient under rule 32 because at sentencing the district court disregarded all of Almeida’s prior statements, written and oral, and gave Almeida the opportunity to accept responsibility with counsel present. This Almeida did not do.
AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 25, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 25, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0243. LAUREN SPRAYBERRY et al. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF 

PUTNAM COUNTY, GEORGIA et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2021SUCV0138
---

Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010 and Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary C. Evans, chairman of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April 30,
2010


/s/
      Gary C. Evans
              Gary
      C. Evans,Chairman




In
connection with the Annual Report of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010 and Form10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald D. Ormand, chief
financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April 30,
2010


/s/
      Ronald D. Ormand
              Ronald
      D. Ormand,Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of the iShares® S&P GSCICommodity-Indexed Trust (the Trust) and iShares®
S&P GSCICommodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC
(the Investing Pool) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Executive Officer of BlackRock
Asset Management International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust and Manager of the Investing Pool, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
and Investing Pool.

Date: February 26, 2010

|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|/s/ Michael A. Latham                                                   
|Michael A. Latham* Chief
Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)





|* | The Registrant is a trust and the Co-Registrant is a limited liability company and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of BlackRock Asset
Management International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant and Manager of the Co-Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.1 RULE 13A - 14(A)/15D - 14(A) CERTIFICATION

     I, Francis J. Evanitsky, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Juniata Valley
Financial Corp.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and porcedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) [OMITTED PURSANT TO THE GUIDANCE OF RELEASE NO. 8238, SECTION
III(E)];

         c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



     Date                                  /s/ Francis J. Evanitsky
         -----------------------------     -------------------------------------
                                           Francis J. Evanitsky, President & CEO
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




                                January 28, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)



                           Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


 Pennsylvania                           000-18833                 23-2598554
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (State or other jurisdiction         (Commission               (IRS Employer
  of incorporation)                   File Number)           Identification No.)


100 E. Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pennsylvania                   19335
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                           (Zip Code)


                                 (610) 269-9700
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


                                 Not Applicable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>


ITEM 7.      FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND EXHIBITS

(c) Exhibits

The following exhibit is filed herewith.

             Exhibit                           Description
             -------           --------------------------------------------
             99.1              Press Release dated January 28, 2004


ITEM 12.     RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

On January 28, 2004, Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. (the "Company") reported its
results of operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

For additional information, reference is made to the Company's press release
dated January 28, 2004 which is included as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated
herein by reference thereto.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                           Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.


Date         01/28/04                      By: /s/ Joseph T. Crowley
    ----------------------------               --------------------------------
                                               Joseph T. Crowley
                                               Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.57

July 15, 2002

Stephen C. Farrell
8 Minute Man Lane
Lexington, MA 02421

                      Re: Amendment of Employment Agreement
Dear Steve,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the Employment Agreement dated as
of September 1, 2000, by and between you and PolyMedica Corporation (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of April 16, 2001;
September 24, 2001; October 12, 2001 and May 31, 2002 (together, the "Employment
Agreement").

      Term of Employment. The Employment Period, as defined in Section 2 of the
      Amended Executive Employment Agreement, is extended to August 31, 2003.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.

                                   Very truly yours,


                                   /s/ Steven J. Lee
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Steven J. Lee
                                   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


/s/ Stephen C. Farrell
----------------------------
Stephen C. Farrell
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          42,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,759,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   139,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,074,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,356,000
<PP&E>                                      22,482,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,300,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,923,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,711,000
<BONDS>                                        339,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,460,000
<COMMON>                                        49,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,364,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,923,000
<SALES>                                     27,317,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       13,474,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,021,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                744,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   277,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   467,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

CA 19-8

 

April 09, 2019 

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to institutions 

supervised by the Federal Reserve with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or less. 

SUBJECT: Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation X

 This CA Letter republishes interagency examination procedures for Regulation X – Real 

Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) for procedural reasons, without any change. 

Specifically: 

• Contemporaneously with this CA Letter, the Board is publishing interagency examination 

procedures for Regulation E – Electronic Fund Transfers and Regulation Z – Truth in 

Lending (TILA) to reflect amendments to those regulations published by the Consumer 

Financial Protection Bureau regarding prepaid card accounts. 

• CA Letter 19-7, which transmits the Regulation Z examination procedures, supersedes 

CA Letter 18-3. CA Letter 18-3 also transmitted interagency examination procedures for 

Regulation X. 

• Because CA Letter 18-3 has been superseded, this CA Letter separately republishes the 

interagency examination procedures for Regulation X to confirm that they remain valid. 

The Regulation X examination procedures remain unchanged. 

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Dana Miller, Senior 

Counsel, Supervisory Policy and Outreach at (202) 452-2751. In addition, questions may be sent 

via the Board’s public website.1

 

1 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx. 
Page 2 of 2

Sincerely, 

Carol Evans 

Associate Director

Attachments: 

• Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation X 

Cross-References: 

• CA 19-7 “Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation Z” (Apr. 09, 

2019) 

• CA 18-3, “Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for Regulation Z” (Apr. 09, 

2019)
A89A2010.

#### HUMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

(390 SE2d 446)

Decided January 30, 1990.

*Weaver & Weaver, George W. Weaver, Brenda S. Weaver,*for appellant.

*Darrell E. Wilson, District Attorney, Lisa*VF. *Pettit, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

The State of Georgia brought this action to condemn property used in violation of OCGA § 16-12-22. On February 14, 1989, the trial court entered a “final order” forfeiting the property pursuant to OCGA § 16-12-32. On February 27, 1989, appellant filed a motion to set aside the judgment attacking the “final order.” Following a hearing, the motion to set aside the judgment was denied on April 6, 1989. This is a direct appeal from the order denying the motion to set aside judgment. *Held:*

Appeals from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment must be taken by application in the nature of a petition. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). Accordingly, this direct appeal must be dismissed. See *State Farm &c. Ins. Co. v. Yancey,*258 Ga. 802 (375 SE2d 39).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Carley, C. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*