alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

                               SHOPKO STORES, INC.

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ShopKo Stores, Inc.
(the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 1, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 15, 2003
                                        SHOPKO STORES, INC.


                                            /s/ Sam K. Duncan
                                        ---------------------
                                            Sam K. Duncan
                                            Chief Executive Officer,
                                            President



      This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                       29
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00331

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.J. AND A.R.,

M INOR C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Wichita County (12928

- JR

- A)

February 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
No. 61167.

protest 309090-K (Boston).

#### Stone & Downer Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),      and, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      31, 2010    |   |                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                                   |   |                            |   |
|                                                   | By:    | /s/ Robert DeMeulemeester  |   |
|                                                   |   | Robert      DeMeulemeeste       |   |
|                                                   |   | Chief      Financial Officer    |   |
|                                                   |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 11, 2014

No. 04-14-00155-CV

EX PARTE Wiley SMITH

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On March 6, 2014, this court received relator’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

The court has considered relator’s petition, and record materials received from the trial court, and 

has determined that relator’s petition is now moot. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at 

a later date.

It is so ORDERED on March 11, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1991-EM5-01082, styled In the Interest of A.S.G., Child, pending in the 

150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nick Catoe Jr. presiding.
No. 63988.

protest 58/7630 (Pembina).

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of ithe plaintiff was sustained.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 82

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–62 is further amended by striking

4 ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ in section 106(c) and inserting
2

HJ 82 RDS

1 ‘‘November 23, 1999’’. Public Law 106–46 is amended by

2 striking ‘‘November 18, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘November

3 23, 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 23.4

                            CONSENT OF MERCER CAPITAL


     As independent  advisors to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors
of Tengasco,  Inc.,  we hereby  consent to the  inclusion  in this  Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed by Tengasco,  Inc. of the  information  contained in
our written preliminary report to the Special Committee,  our oral report to the
Special  Committee and our engagement letter with the Special Committee for such
purposes.

     We  further  consent  to the  reference  to this  firm  under  the  heading
"EXPERTS".



/s/ Andrew K. Gibbs                       February 12, 2004
---------------------------------         --------------------------------------
Andrew K. Gibbs                           Date
President of Mercer Capital
No. 66196.

#### T. D. Downing Company *v.*United States,

protest 61/4427 (Boston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 51543.

#### Protests 120616-K, etc., of Edward Prill et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 27 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 1999

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H. Gray as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Dr. Hanna H. Gray of Illinois 
on April 11, 1999, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for 
a term of six years, effective April 12, 1999.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00325-CR

Omar Fahmawi

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1421857D)

July 20, 2017

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          49,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    179,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,097
<PP&E>                                       4,548,251<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                               (539,184)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,198,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,371,649
<BONDS>                                      1,273,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        378
<COMMON>                                        27,409
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,473,708)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,198,916
<SALES>                                        204,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,746
<CGS>                                                0<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,790,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             845,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,248,872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,248,872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  28,257
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,220,615)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
<FN>
<F1>Includes assets held for sale
<F2>Not calculated
<F3>Includes discontinued operations
</FN>


</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3289

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Thein Maung, also known as Joseph Ramarn lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

____________ Submitted: May 17, 2024 Filed: May 22, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Thein Maung appeals after he pleaded guilty to multiple counts relating to a scheme to defraud the government and other individuals. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable.Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court 1 did not err in

imposing the below-Guidelines sentence that Maung received, as the record reflects that the court properly calculated the Guidelines range and considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and there is no indication the court overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. Meza-Lopez, 808 F.3d 743, 745-46 (8th Cir. 2015); United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); United States v. Moore, 581 F.3d 681, 684 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
----

| Name of Subsidiary                      |   | Organized Under Laws of |   | Business Names     |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                                    |   |                    |   |               |
| Boardwalk      Operating GP, LLC        |   | Delaware                |   |               |
| Boardwalk      Pipelines, LP            |   | Delaware                |   |               |
| Texas      Gas Transmission, LLC        |   | Delaware                |   | Texas      Gas     |
| Gulf      South Pipeline Company, LP    |   | Delaware                |   | Gulf      South    |
| GS      Pipeline Company, LLC           |   | Delaware                |   |               |
| Gulf      Crossing Pipeline Company LLC |   | Delaware                |   | Gulf      Crossing |

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

p0901 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138765

CHRIS GOODRICH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138765 COA: 281652 Genesee CC: 06-083994-CL HOME DEPOT, HOME DEPOT, INC., and/or HOME DEPOT USA, INC., RICHARD TINDALL, MIKE KINZELL, a/k/a MIKE KINSAL, JULIA PETERS, and LINDSEY MAGLEY, a/k/a LINDSAY MAGLEY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY

, J., would grant leave to appeal.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Name of Applicant]Docket No. CP  -

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF

PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY

(or) APPLICATION FOR ABANDONMENT

(                        )

Take notice that on [date filed], [Name and Address of Applicant] filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act to [briefly summarize the facts contained in the application in such a way as to acquaint the public with its scope and purpose. The form of notice shall also include the name, address, and telephone number of an authorized contact person].

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).  Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding.  Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate.  Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.  Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant.  On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.  

The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at http://www.ferc.gov.  Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.    There is an “eSubscription” link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).  For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free).  For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on (insert date).

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.
# L_2022323EN.01003201.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/32

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/2485

of 12 December 2022

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Rosalia’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Rosalia’ forwarded by Austria and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Rosalia’ forwarded by Austria and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Rosalia" should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Rosalia" should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Rosalia’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 305, 10.8.2022, p. 18.

2

---
Chattanooga

Eagle

Ford

Western

Gulf

TX-LA-MS

Salt Basin

Uinta Basin

Devonian (Ohio)

Marcellus

Utica

Bakken***

AvalonBone Spring

San Joaquin

Basin

Monterey

Santa Maria,

Ventura, Los

Angeles

Basins

MontereyTemblor

Pearsall

Tuscaloosa

Big Horn

Basin

Denver

Basin

Powder River

Basin

Park

Basin

Niobrara*

Mowry

Niobrara*

Heath**

Manning

Canyon

Appalachian

Basin

Antrim

Barnett

Bend

New

Albany

Woodford

BarnettWoodford

Lewis

HilliardBaxterMancos

ExcelloMulky

Fayetteville

FloydNeal

Gammon

Cody

HaynesvilleBossier

Hermosa

Mancos

Pierre

Conasauga

Michigan

Basin

Ft. Worth

Basin

Palo Duro

Basin

Permian

Basin

Illinois

Basin

Anadarko

Basin

Greater

Green

River

Basin

Cherokee Platform

San Juan

Basin

Williston

Basin

Black Warrior

Basin

Ardmore Basin

Paradox Basin

Raton

Basin

Montana

Thrust

Belt

Marfa

Basin

Valley & Ridge

Province

Arkoma Basin

Forest

City Basin

Piceance

Basin

Lower 48 states shale plays

0 100 200 300 400

Miles

±

Source: Energy Information Administration based on data from various published studies.

Updated: May 9, 2011

Shale plays Basins

Stacked plays

Basins

Current plays

Prospective plays

* Mixed shale &

chalk play

** Mixed shale &

limestone play

***Mixed shale &

tight dolostonesiltstone-sandstone

Intermediate depth/ age

Shallowest/ youngest

Deepest/ oldest
**PROMISSORY
      NOTE**





**THIS
      NOTE MUST BE SURRENDERED UPON PAYMENT IN FULL**








**$
      239,092.60                                           Miami,
      FL                                           Date:
      05/31/2007**








Upon
      twelve (12) months after date, or earlier at Borrower discretion, for value
      received, Fuego Entertainment, Inc., Borrower, promises to pay to the order
      of
      Hugo M. Cancio, Lender, the sum of Two Hundred Thirty Nine Thousand, ninety
      two
      dollars and sixty cents. ($239,092,60). This amount will carry a 15% interest
      to
      be paid in full interest and principal by no later than June 1, 2008 period,
      unless the parties mutually agree to restructure the note at the time of its
      maturity.





There
      is
      no collateral for this Note nor a prepayment penalty. Borrower agrees to pay
      lender 18% interest for late payments and also agrees to pay for any collection
      cost or legal cost incurred in the event borrower defaults on this
      Note.





All
      payments prior to the expiration of the Note will be applied to principal
      first.





This
      Note
      supersedes any previous Notes between the parties.





The
      content and existence of this Note shall be kept confidential among the parties,
      unless is obligated to be disclosed pursuant to applicable law, regulation
      or
      legal process.





This
      Note
      contains the entire agreement and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous
      communications, understandings and agreements, if any, between the parties
      regarding the Note.  No modifications of this Note or waiver of the
      terms and conditions hereof shall be binding, unless approved by both parties
      in
      writing.





This
      Note
      shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state of
      Florida, except to the extent superseded by federal law.  Any action
      or proceeding brought or arising out of or related to this Note shall be brought
      in the Florida. Recipient consents to personal and subject matter jurisdiction
      of Florida for purposes of any action or proceeding.





All
      sums
      due shall be payable in lawful money of the United States.











___________________________________                                                                          _________________________________


By:
      Fuego
      Entertainment, Inc.,
      Borrower                                                                                    
By: Hugo M. Cancio, Lender


Its:
      CEO,
      Hugo M.
      Cancio                                                                                                              Individually