alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 376

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding

support for the recognition of a Liberty Day.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 376

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas our rights and liberties are rooted in the cherished

documents that gave birth to our nation, those being the

Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution with its Bill of Rights;

Whereas the patriot James Madison, fourth President of the

United States, was the major author of the Virginia

Plan, the model and the basis for that United States
2

•HCON 376 EH

Constitution that emerged from the Constitutional Convention in 1787;

Whereas James Madison kept detailed written records of the

debates and compromises that were in integral part of

that Convention of 1787, which records were published

only after the death of all delegates to the Convention;

Whereas James Madison wrote many of the newspaper articles now known as the Federalist Papers, outlining why

States should endorse the new Constitution and enduring

as some of the best arguments for our form of government;

Whereas James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights into

the 1st Congress of the United States, whereupon the

first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted;

and

Whereas it is altogether fitting that the 16th day of March,

the birthday of the distinguished founding father, James

Madison, would serve as a fitting reminder of Liberty

Day, a celebration of the Declaration of Independence

and the United States Constitution, where our

unalienable rights and liberties are enumerated: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a Liberty Day should be celebrated each

4 year in the United States as a remembrance of both

5 the freedom that Americans were given in the Dec6 laration of Independence and the extraordinary
3

•HCON 376 EH

1 rights and liberties that Americans were given in

2 their Constitution; and

3 (2) all elected and previously-elected representa4 tives of the people who voluntarily give of their time

5 to speak to Americans about those founding docu6 ments, in furtherance of that remembrance of our

7 freedom, our rights and our liberties, deserve our

8 thanks.

Passed the House of Representatives October 10,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Green

Bay West

New

Franken

Suamico

Abrams

Little

Tail

Point

Green

Bay East

Pensaukee Oconto

SE

Dyckesville

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

600

ROST RD

LOCUST RD

COTTAGE RD

LADE BEACH RD

GEANO BEACH RD

CO HWY-S

CO HWY-S

BROWN CO

OCONTO CO

OCONTO CO

BROWN CO

Tibbet Cr

Kirchner

Cr

Little Suamico

River

Tibbet Creek

Lake

Michigan

Little

Tail

Point

40'

30"

37'

42'

4

4 520

48

4

46

4

52

52'

4 30"

4 22 55'

28 000

47

53

21 45'

57'

88°

4

49

43

49

N

44°

49

26

49

300

49

49

49

49

49

49

49

52'

25

87°

57'

000m

46

53

49

49

49

49

55

49

000m

4

42'

4

40'

42

44° 4

4

45

30"

45

44

4

30"

30" 4

47

49

49

E

4

44

23

4

27

2

28

27

4

52

N

25

340

000

50

000m

88°

44°

45'

49

23 29

4 26

49

22

00'

30

29 30 490

55'

48

49

54

49

37'

44°

49

49

2

49

43

30"

FEET

87°

000

49

42

000

E 000m

FEET

FEET

00'

30"

49

FEET

50

30"

54

LITTLE TAIL POINT, WI

2013

Expressway Local Connector

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

Secondary Hwy Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

LITTLE TAIL POINT QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

Imagery..................................................NAIP, July 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2013

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 16T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983 (central

zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.12

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

DQ

16T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 40 ́

12 MILS

4° 0 ́

71 MILS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
             THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
             FROM THE THIRD QUARTER 10-QSB FOR INSCI'S 1997 FISCAL YEAR
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000878612
<NAME>     m7rpwrt@
       
<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                                    4776
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             3214
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               100
<INVENTORY>                                                                 93
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          8190
<PP&E>                                                                    1938
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            1206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           10600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     2942
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 39
<COMMON>                                                                    40
<OTHER-SE>                                                                7535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             10600
<SALES>                                                                   8380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          8380
<CGS>                                                                     3336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             3336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          5787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         (60)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           (683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       (683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              (683)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE CIVIL 

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

No. 692 CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES 

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13

th day of March, 2019, the following are reappointed as 

members of the Civil Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years, commencing 

June 30, 2019:

The Honorable Christine A. Ward

Allegheny County

The Honorable Daniel J. Anders

Philadelphia

Stanley M. Stein, Esquire

Allegheny County
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101943 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate
Account Seven on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of Hartford Life
and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory financial statements as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of our report dated February 21,
2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate Account Seven
relating to the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of
such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings
"Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 46 0 . I N RE W I LLI E A. W ALDEN.

W i l l i e A. W al d en d i ed i n 1 9 7 1

, an d t h e t ri al co u rt d i s ch arg ed h i s d au g h t er as

t h e ad m i n i s t rat ri x o f t h e es t at e i n 2 0 0 5

. I n 2 0 19

, th e d eced en t ’ s g ran ds o n , Om ar

W al d en , fi l ed a m o t i o n u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0 s eek i n g t o s et as i d e t h e 2 0 0 5 o rd er

d i s ch arg i n g t h e d au g h t er an d t o reo p en th e es t at e. In J an u ary 2 0 2 0, t h e t ri al co u rt

en t ered i t s o rd er den y i n g t h e g ran d s o n ’ s m o t i o n , a n d t h e g ran d s o n fi l ed t h i s d i rect

ap p eal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

“ [T] h e d en i al o f a m o t i o n t o set as i de a fi n al ju dg m en t un d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0

i s n o t di rect l y ap p eal ab l e an d i n s t ead req u i res t h e fi l in g o f an ap p l i c a t i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal u n d er OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (b ).” Ji m E ll i s At l a n ta

, In c. v. Ad a ms o n , 2 8 3 G a. A p p

. 11 6

, 1 1 6 ( 6 4 0 SE2 d 6 8 8 ) (2 0 0 6); s ee OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (8 ), (b ).

“ Co m p l i an ce wi t h t h e d is cret i on ary ap p eal s p ro ced ure i s j u ri s d i ct i o n a l .” S mo a k v. Dep t. o f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 2 2 1 Ga. A p p

. 2 5 7

, 2 57 (4 7 1 SE2 d 60 ) (1 99 6 ). Th e

g ran d s o n’ s fai l u re t o fo l l ow t h e req u i red ap p el lat e p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f
ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is d i rect ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 25, 2020

11/25/2020
No. 59913.

#### Leonard Levin Co. and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 192187-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]                        Exhibit 99.2d




                         Independent Accountants' Report


The Board of Directors
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Assertion of Management of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells
 Fargo Bank, N.A. (the Company), that the Company complied with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for
 the year ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's
 compliance with those minimum  servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
Established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures, as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
 believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
 examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
 with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
 aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                               /s/ KPMG LLP

February 21, 2006






[Letterhead of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage]



Assertion of Management of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A.


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage,
a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the Company) has complied in all
material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers.

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond
along with an errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $100 million
and $20 million, respectively.




/s/ Michael J. Heid                             February 21, 2006
---------------------------
Division President, Capital Markets, Finance, & Administration
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


/s/ Franklin R. Codel                           February 21, 2006
---------------------------
Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Real Estate
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


/s/ Mary Coffin                                 February 21, 2006
---------------------------
Executive Vice President, Servicing & Post Closing
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


/s/ Cara K. Heiden
---------------------------
Division President, Nat'l Consumer & Institutional Lending
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# 4 3 APPENDIX – C

m o n t h :
__ ___

__

__ (

y e a r :
__ ___

__

_ U A S $ # : $

_ ____ ___

___ D a t e ( I s s u e ( D i s c o v e r e d D a t e ( I s s u e ( A d d r e s s e d S o f

t w a r e ( U p d a t e s A i r f r a m e ( E n g i n e s P r o p e l l e r s C a m e r a ( G i m b a l L a n d i n g (G e a r V i b r a t i o n ( D a m p e n i n g O t h e r : 

## M O N T H L Y M A I N T E N A N C E L O G I s s u e ( D e s c r i pt i o n (& (M a i n t e n a n c e (Co n d u ct e d M a i n t e n a n c e ( P e r fo r m e d ( B y : ( ( ( P r i n t ( & (S i g n
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1061 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1061

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that ministers 
may elect at any time not to be covered by Social Security with respect 
                   to future services as a minister.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1999

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that ministers 
may elect at any time not to be covered by Social Security with respect 
                   to future services as a minister.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clergy Freedom of Choice Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. MINISTERS MAY ELECT AT ANY TIME NOT TO BE COVERED BY SOCIAL 
              SECURITY WITH RESPECT TO FUTURE SERVICES AS A MINISTER.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 1402 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to ministers, members of religious 
orders, and Christian Science practitioners) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Time for filing application, and effective date of 
        exemption, for ministers.--In the case of an individual who is 
        a duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed minister of a 
        church--
                    ``(A) an application pursuant to paragraph (1) with 
                respect to services performed by such individual as a 
                minister may be filed at any time, and
                    ``(B) an exemption received by such an individual 
                pursuant to this subsection with respect to such 
                services shall be effective for the taxable year during 
                which such application is filed and for all succeeding 
                taxable years.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (3) of section 1402(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``An individual'' and inserting ``Except as 
        provided in paragraph (5), an individual''.
            (2) Paragraph (4) of section 1402(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``An exemption'' and inserting ``Except as 
        provided in paragraph (5), an exemption''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
No. 66644.

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/12139 (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, covered by entries 0-616 and 0-1132, consists of model-B Cobalt therapy units; the merchandise, covered by entry 0-1133, of one model-B Cobalt therapy *396unit with accessories and parts; and the merchandise, covered by entry 0-2451, of a model-A Cobalt therapy unit, all imported for the use of nonprofit organizations, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10615)

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co., a/c Descowake Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 16419, etc.

(Decided October 30, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the -defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part hereof, have been submitted-for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise appraised in unit values expressed in Belgian francs less 20%, plus export packing. .

> 2. That the said merchandise consists of enamelware exported from Belgium and entered or withdrawn from Customs warehouse for consumption before the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 3. That at the time of exportation of the said merchandise to the United States, the prices at which -such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Belgium in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for consumption in,Belgium were the appraised unit values, plus 10% sales tax, less 40% discount, plus packing as invoiced.

> *4404. That at the time of exportation of the said merchandise to the United States, there did not exist a higher export value as defined in Sec. 402a (d) of the Tariff Act as amended for such or similar merchandise.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in the attached Schedule “A” are submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values for the importations covered by the appeals herein were the appraised unit values, plus 10 per centum sales tax, less 40 per centum discount, plus packing as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[No. 14565.

Department Two.

March 2, 1918.]

#### Coats-Fordney Logging Company, *Respondent,*v. Grays Harbor Logging Company *et al.,*Appellants.1

Eminent Domain—Damages—Award—Appeal—Review. An appeal from the award of damages in eminent domain proceedings presents only the propriety and justness of the award.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Reynolds, J., entered July 17, 1917, upon the verdict of a jury awarding damages in a condemnation proceeding.

Affirmed.

*W. H. Abel, A. M. Abel,*and *Domvorth & Todd,*for appellants.

*Bridges & Bruener,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 171 Pac. 241.

Mount, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of $2,500 damages for the taking of an alleged private way of necessity through the lands of the appellants.

The only error assigned is that the statute upon which the proceeding is based is in violation of the f our*492teenth amendment to the Federal constitution. That question was determined adversely to the contention of the appellants in *State ex rel. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Superior Court,*82 Wash. 503, 144 Pac. 722. No new argument is presented upon this appeal. This court has uniformly held that an appeal from an award of damages in a condemnation case presents to this court for consideration only the propriety and justice of the award. *State ex rel. McCormick v. Superior Court,*43 Wash. 91, 86 Pac. 205; *State ex rel. Pagett v. Superior Court,*46 Wash. 35, 89 Pac. 178; *Whatcom County v. Yellowkanim,*48 Wash. 90, 92 Pac. 892; *Calispel Hiking District v. McLeish,*63 Wash. 331, 115 Pac. 508.

No claim is made upon this appeal that the damages awarded were not sufficient, or that the trial court committed error upon the trial of that question. There is, therefore, nothing for us to consider, unless we review our decision in *State ex rel. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Superior Court, supra.*Since the question there considered cannot he. raised upon this appeal, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

We are asked by the appellants to consolidate this appeal with the application for a writ of review in *State ex rel. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Superior Court, ante*p. 485, 171 Pac. 238. These cases present entirely different questions. For that reason, the motion is denied.

Ellis, C. J., Holcomb, and Chadwick, JJ., concur.