alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.



|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation               
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                         
|       |                                                         
|       | /S/ Kelly Tucek                                         
|       |                                                         
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                             
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and               
|       | principal financial officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.
|Date:  | August 4, 2004
# L_2023039EN.01006501.xml

| 9.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/65

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 110 of 8 April 2022
  )

| 1. | On page 68, in the Annex, in entry 922 (Ekaterina IGNATOVA), in the ‘Identifying information’ column: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 68, in the Annex, in entry 922 (Ekaterina IGNATOVA), in the ‘Identifying information’ column:

for:

‘Lyudmila Rukavishikova (mother)’,

read:

‘Lyudmila Rukavishnikova (mother)’.

| 2. | On page 69, in the Annex, in entry 923 (Anastasia IGNATOVA), in the ‘Identifying information’ column: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 69, in the Annex, in entry 923 (Anastasia IGNATOVA), in the ‘Identifying information’ column:

for:

‘Lyudmila Rukavishikova (grandmother)’,

read:

‘Lyudmila Rukavishnikova (grandmother)’.

| 3. | On page 69, in the Annex, in entry 924 (Lyudmila RUKAVISHIKOVA), in the ‘Name’ column: |
| --- | --- |

3.

On page 69, in the Annex, in entry 924 (Lyudmila RUKAVISHIKOVA), in the ‘Name’ column:

for:

‘Lyudmila RUKAVISHIKOVA’,

read:

‘Lyudmila RUKAVISHNIKOVA’.

| 4. | On page 69, in the Annex, in entry 924 (Lyudmila RUKAVISHIKOVA), in the ‘Reasons’ column appearing twice: |
| --- | --- |

4.

On page 69, in the Annex, in entry 924 (Lyudmila RUKAVISHIKOVA), in the ‘Reasons’ column appearing twice:

for:

‘Lyudmila Rukavishikova’,

read:

‘Lyudmila Rukavishnikova’.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7320

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONELL JONES, a/k/a Tater,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:09-cr-00203-HEH-RCY-1; 3:16-cv-00632-HEH)

Submitted: February 16, 2017 Decided: February 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronell Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronell Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
January 5, 1950

No. 53871.

#### Florida Fishermens Supply Co. *v.*United States,

protest 144602-K.

Abstract 53713. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Leonhard Dreimann, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Salton, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Salton, Inc.

                                      By: /s/ Leonhard Dreimann
                                          ----------------------
                                          Leonhard Dreimann
                                          Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Salton, Inc. and will be retained by Salton, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       49
Before the First Division,

October 17, 1966

No. P66/269. —

#### S. S. Kresge Co. *v.*United States, protest 63/20418 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of glass paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ace Importing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 468, Abstract 64185), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

 ) Master File No. C06-794RSL

In re F5 NETWORKS, INC. DERIVATIVE )

LITIGATION. ) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

) PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO FILE

) SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

)

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ “Motion for Leave to File Material for

Consideration with Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss” (Dkt. #64). In their motion,

plaintiffs request leave to submit the In re Zoran Corp. Derivative Litig., 2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis

43402 (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2007) decision to support their opposition to defendant F5’s motion to

dismiss. The Court considered the In re Zoran Corp. decision in its August 6, 2007 Order

Granting F5’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Make Demand. See Dkt. #69 at 17 (citing In re

Zoran Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis 43402, at *35-36). Therefore, plaintiffs’ motion (Dkt. #64)

is DENIED AS MOOT. 

DATED this 6th day of November, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00794-RSL Document 79 Filed 11/06/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Renaissance Bioenergy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Samuel Gulko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 13th day of September, 2010.





SAMUEL GULKOSamuel GulkoChief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

March 17, 1960

No. 63957.

protests 223333-K and 325915-K (Honolulu).

#### S. H. Kress & Co. *v.*United States,

*388Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
                                                    
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                                      11,308,199
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               14,680,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  (542,689)
<INVENTORY>                                                 16,034,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            42,991,112
<PP&E>                                                     636,789,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (223,976,595)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             480,702,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       29,746,738
<BONDS>                                                    306,060,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 115,619,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               480,702,212
<SALES>                                                    $72,605,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           $72,605,502
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               54,327,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          12,396,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              6,600,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          6,600,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 6,600,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
        
 


</TABLE>
No. 50280.

#### Protest 977654-G of Butler Bros. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of- counsel that the Rockingham earthenware is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Butler Bros.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303), the protest was sustained as claimed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                          12,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,773
<INVENTORY>                                    728,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               929,165
<PP&E>                                       1,514,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                 597,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,066,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          843,204
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           304
<OTHER-SE>                                     696,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,066,807
<SALES>                                        749,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               752,676
<CGS>                                          557,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  736,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                562
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,234
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,796
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


State of Delaware

Secretary of State

Division of Corporations

Delivered 12:49 PM 08/29/2003

FILED 12:49 PM 08/29/2003

SRV 030563161


 


STATE of
DELAWARE

CERTIFICATE of AMENDMENT of

CERTIFICATE of INCORPORATION


 


•                                          First:  This at a meeting of the Board of Directors
of PUTNAM MANAGEMENT INC. resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a
proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation,
declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the
stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof.


 


The resolution
setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:


 


Resolved, that
the Certificate of incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing the
Article thereof numbered “One” so that, as amended, said Article shall
be and read as follows:


 


The name of
the Corporation shall be PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.”


 


•                                          Second:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of
the Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation was duly called and held, upon notice to accordance with Section
222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting
the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of
the amendment.


 


•                                          Third:  That said amendment was duly adopted to
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.


 


•                                          Fourth:  That the capital of said corporation shall
not be reduced under or by reason of said amendment.


 


 


	
   

  	
  BY:

  	
  /s/ Rick Plotnikoff

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  (Authorized Officer)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  NAME:

  	
  Rick Plotnikoff, President and Sole Shareholder

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  (Type or Print)
<PAGE>   1




                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                       ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (000 OMITTED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,             
                                                   ----------------------------------------------------------             
                                                   1994          1995        1996         1997          1998
                                                   ----          ----        ----         ----          ----
<S>                                               <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes.....................   $ 409        $ 4,154     $  9,870     $ 16,910     $ 41,167
Fixed charges:
     Actual interest expense...................     215            184           80        2,021        5,228
     Interest portion of operating leases......     127            117          146          312          967
     Amortization of debt issuance costs.......       0              0            0          150          305
                                                  -----        -------     --------     --------     --------
       Total fixed charges.....................     342            301          226        2,483        6,500
                                                  -----        -------     --------     --------     --------
Net income as adjusted.........................   $ 751        $ 4,455      $10,096      $19,393      $47,677
                                                  -----        -------     --------     --------     --------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.............    2.2x          14.8x        44.7x         7.8x         7.3x
                                                  =====        =======     ========     ========     ========
</TABLE>
No. 58378

protests 185617-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alfred Orlik, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel -that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 19 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 19

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 19

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used from 8 o'clock 
ante meridian until 3 o'clock post meridian on April 13, 1999, for a 
ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of 
victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 
be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of 
the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Headquarters

Return to top
# C_2022211EN.01000201.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 May 2022

appointing a member of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board

(2022/C 211/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Decision No 235/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (1), and in particular Article 3(5) thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 18 December 2020 (2), the Council appointed two members of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (the ’Board’) for a term of office of three years from 1 February 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 18 December 2020 (2), the Council appointed two members of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (the ’Board’) for a term of office of three years from 1 February 2021.

| (2) | One of the three members of the Board appointed by the Council, Mr Jørgen ELMESKOV, resigned before the expiry of his term of office. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

One of the three members of the Board appointed by the Council, Mr Jørgen ELMESKOV, resigned before the expiry of his term of office.

| (3) | It is therefore necessary to appoint a new member of the Board. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It is therefore necessary to appoint a new member of the Board.

| (4) | Article 3(2) of Decision No 235/2008/EC states that the members of the Board are to be selected from among experts possessing outstanding competence in the field of statistics, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Article 3(2) of Decision No 235/2008/EC states that the members of the Board are to be selected from among experts possessing outstanding competence in the field of statistics,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Martine DURAND is hereby appointed member of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board for a term of office of three years.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 May 2022.

For the Council

The President

B. LE MAIRE

---

(1)  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 17.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 18 December 2020 appointing two members of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (OJ C 445, 22.12.2020, p. 3).

2

---