alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 11118)

#### Maher-App & Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 1349; 2957; 3768.

*722(Decided December 21, 1965)

*Stone, Pigman & Benjamin*for tbe plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

Tbe appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in tbe schedule of cases, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe respective parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe merchandise covered 'by tbe appeals for reappraisement enumerated on tbe Schedule of Oases attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of Carnival throw-away necklets, Assortment No. 200, exported from Czeeboslovokia between August 1,1954, and November 30,1954.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that tbe merchandise, tbe facts, and tbe issues in tbe appeals for reappraisement enumerated in tbe Schedule of Gases attached hereto and made a part hereof are tbe same in all material respects as tbe merchandise, tbe facts, and the issues in tbe case of *Superior Merchandise Co.*v. *United States,*54 Cust. Ct. 781, A.R.D. 185, 100 Advance Treasury Decisions, No. 14, p. 55, and that tbe record in said case may be incorporated and made a part of tbe record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER 'STIPULATED AND AGREED that at tbe time of exportation of the instant merchandise to tbe United States, tbe market value or tbe price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in tbe principal market of tbe country from which exported, in tbe usual wholesale quantities and in tbe ordinary course of trade, for export to tbe United States, including tbe cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to tbe United States, was tbe invoiced unit value of 18% cents per dozen, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered prior to February 28, 1958, and that these appeals for reappraisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

In view of this stipulation and on the authority of the decision cited, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is the invoice unit value of 1814 cents per dozen, plus packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

April 9, 1962

No. 66676.

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. and Daniel Bennett et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/4480, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of temporarily strung imitation pearls similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66102, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 55087.

#### Julius Garfinckel *&*Company and Woodward & Lothrop *v.*United States,

protests 153217-K and 153218-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 218 (Friday, November 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 67344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27486]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, November 14, 2012, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
Briefing Matters:
    1. Bedside Sleepers--Notice of Proposed Rulemaking;
    2. Handheld Carriers--Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 6, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27486 Filed 11-7-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
No. P68/126.

protests 60/23451, etc. (New York).

No. P68/127.

protests 63/20846 (New York).

No. P68/128.

protests 65/4909, etc. (New York).

#### The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States, The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States, The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of trays (boats) similar in all materal respects to those the subject of *The Rembar Co. Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 239, C.D. 2774), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-16-00471-CV 

Chapparal Operating Company 

v. 

EnergyPro, Inc. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 43rd District Court 

of Parker County (CV16-0081) 

October 26, 2017 

Opinion by Justice Kerr 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

 It is further ordered that Appellant Chapparal Operating Company shall pay 

all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Elizabeth Kerr_________________ 

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 84 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 84

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1999

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

                           November 18, 1999

   The Committee on Appropriations discharged; considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-62 is 
further amended by striking ``November 18, 1999'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``December 3, 1999'', and by striking 
``$346,483,754'' in section 119 and inserting in lieu thereof 
``$755,719,054''. Public Law 106-46 is amended by striking ``November 
18, 1999'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``December 3, 1999''.
                                 <all>
```
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

C:\Users\Robert.Finamore\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\JL0K7VWC\131209reciprocity letter.doc

9 December 2013

Mr Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington DC 20590

Dear Paul, 

CHARTER OPERATIONS BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA

This letter is to confirm that the UK Government, on the basis of reciprocity, 

will approve requests from US-designated airlines to perform fifth, sixth and 

seventh freedom charter operations on the understanding that the US Government 

will approve similar requests from UK-designated airlines. 

The UK Government also confirms that approval for similar charter operations by US 

airlines to the UK's Overseas Territories will also be granted, where reciprocity 

applies.

Yours sincerely,

Judith

Judith Ritchie

First Secretary (Transport Policy)

cc: Robert Finemore, DoT

 James Gilderoy, DfT London 

Tel: (202) 588-6696

Fax: (202) 588-7901

E-mail: Judith.Ritchie@fco.gov.uk
TABLE 2. Percentage increase (mean and 95% CI) of COPD mortality associated with a 10 μg/m3 increase of 2-day moving average 

concentrations - effect estimates of individual cities and combined effects

City

PM10 SO2 NO2

SinglepollutantAdjusted 

for SO2

Adjusted

for NO2

SinglepollutantAdjusted for 

PM10

Adjusted for 

NO2

SinglepollutantAdjusted for 

PM10

Adjusted for 

SO2

Beijing 0.28(-0.10,0.67) 0.28(-0.20,0.75) 0.32(-0.23,0.87) 0.48(-0.47,1.43) 0.04(-1.13,1.21) 0.31(-0.94,1.56) 0.74(-0.83,2.31) -0.22(-2.45,2.00) 0.37(-1.71,2.44)

Shanghai 0.42(0.16,0.68) 0.04(-0.29,0.37) -0.07(-0.46,0.32) 1.81(1.06,2.57) 1.73(0.76,2.70) 0.63(-0.55,1.80) 1.79(1.11,2.48) 1.93(0.92,2.95) 1.31(0.25,2.37)

Guangzhou 2.10(1.41,2.79) 2.17(1.12,3.21) 1.34(-0.17,2.84) 1.74(0.88,2.61) -0.10(-1.42,1.20) -0.82(-2.38,0.74) 2.63(1.78,3.48) 1.18(-0.67,3.04) 3.34(1.80,4.88)

Hong Kong 0.47(-0.34,1.29) 0.37(-0.52,1.26) -0.47(-1.67,0.73) 0.74(-0.90,2.39) 0.43(-1.36,2.21) -1.20(-3.18,0.79) 1.36(0.40,2.33) 1.74(0.33,3.16) 1.90(0.73,3.07)

Pooled estimates 0.78(0.13,1.42)* 0.57(-0.09,1.23)* 0.08(-0.22,0.38) 1.38(0.92,1.85) 0.72(0.11,1.33) 0.01(-0.70,0.71) 1.85(1.40,2.29) 1.55(0.84,2.27) 1.78(1.11,2.44)

* Estimates of random-effect model
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), I, C. Boyd Clarke, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ C. Boyd Clarke
--------------------------------------------
C. Boyd Clarke
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman


Date:    November 2, 2005
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 386

Supporting the use of child safety seat occupancy identification programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. CROWLEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the use of child safety seat occupancy

identification programs.

Whereas 8,870 children under age four are injured and 670

children under age four are killed in auto accidents every

year;

Whereas emergency medical personnel at the scene of an accident often have no source of information to identify a

child or any special medical needs of the child, especially

when the child is not riding with parents or when the

parents or other adult passengers in an automobile have

been incapacitated in the accident;

Whereas rescue efforts proceed more smoothly if emergency

personnel can identify the child or children at the scene

of an accident;
2

•HCON 386 IH

Whereas the child safety seat occupancy identification program known as the ‘‘We Have A Little Emergency’’

(WHALE) program is an identification and information

package for child car safety seats that uses self-adhesive

information labels to provide the child’s name, date of

birth, essential medical history, and an emergency contact, as well as the child’s photo, which parents can update as their child grows;

Whereas because the informational label is attached to the

rear of the child safety seat, the privacy of the child’s

personal information is ensured;

Whereas the WHALE program is in use in counties and municipalities in 32 States; and

Whereas counties and municipalities distribute the identification stickers to schools, hospitals, and organizations involved in providing child care, which in turn distribute

the stickers to parents to place on child safety seats:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress urges State and local gov3 ernments, as well as parents, schools, institutions involved

4 in providing child care, to use the ‘‘We Have A Little

5 Emergency’’ (WHALE) child safety seat occupancy identi6 fication program to provide identification and essential

7 medical information for children in the event of an auto8 mobile accident.

Æ
No. P68/102.

protests 64/16823, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Famous Jobbing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*1009Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rainwear similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Evan J. Griffith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
                  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
                  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  November 14, 2003

                                                     /s/Evan J. Griffith
                                                     Evan J. Griffith
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-19;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee.


          Date: March 24, 2006


                                           /s/ Steve Bailey
                                           ----------------
                                           Steve Bailey
                                           Senior Managing Director
# Official Journal C 305A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.305.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 305A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5510 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.305.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 305A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5510 October 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2012/C 305A/01 | Call for expression of interest for contract agents for temporary assignments (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2012/C 305A/01

Call for expression of interest for contract agents for temporary assignments (London)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (CS/DA) |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 169 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 187 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | (DA/DE/EN/SK) |
| 198 | (EN/FR) |
| 199 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 204 | (ET/GA/LV/PT) |
| 206 | (CS) |
| 210 | (LT) |
| 211 | (MT) |
| 212 | (PL) |
| 214 | (SK) |
| 215 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 228 | (SL) |
| 266 | |
| 270 | |
| 274 | (CS) |
| 275 | (LV) |
| 276 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 278 | |
| 281 | (MT) |
| 283 | (SV) |
| 285 | (ES) |
| 288 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 290 | |
| 291 | |
| 292 | (HU) |
| 294 | (BG) |
| 296 | (BG) |
| 300 | |
| 302 | |
| 304 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 305 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(CS/DA)

160

161

169

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(DE/EN/FR)

187

189

197

(DA/DE/EN/SK)

198

(EN/FR)

199

(DE/EN/FR)

204

(ET/GA/LV/PT)

206

(CS)

210

(LT)

211

(MT)

212

(PL)

214

(SK)

215

(DE/EN/FR)

228

(SL)

266

270

274

(CS)

275

(LV)

276

(DE/EN/FR)

278

281

(MT)

283

(SV)

285

(ES)

288

(DE/EN/FR)

290

291

292

(HU)

294

(BG)

296

(BG)

300

302

304

(DE/EN/FR)

305

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 82

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from their positions in

connection with the present operations against the Federal Republic

of Yugoslavia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War

Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed

Forces from their positions in connection with the

present operations against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES

4 FROM THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGO5 SLAVIA.

6 Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolu7 tion (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)), the Congress hereby directs the
2

•HCON 82 IH

1 President to remove United States Armed Forces from

2 their positions in connection with the present operations

3 against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia within 30 days

4 after the passage of this resolution or within such longer

5 period as may be necessary to effectuate their safe with6 drawal.

Æ