alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                  EXHIBIT 12(A)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 13 Weeks
                                                  Ended
                                                October 1,
                                                   2005
                                                (UNAUDITED)     2005        2004       2003      2002
                                                -----------   --------   ---------   -------   -------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
<S>                                             <C>           <C>        <C>         <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges
   Interest and amortization of debt issuance
   costs on all indebtedness                      $11,049     $ 51,703   $  39,783   $40,109   $43,357
   Add interest element implicit in rentals           855        3,296       3,443     3,500     3,040
                                                  -------     --------   ---------   -------   -------
      Total fixed charges                         $11,904     $ 54,999   $  43,226   $43,609   $46,397
(Loss) Income
   (Loss) Income from continuing operations
      before income taxes                         $  (432)    $(76,265)  $(131,194)  $10,071   $44,541
   Add fixed charges                               11,904       54,999      43,226    43,609    46,397
                                                  -------     --------   ---------   -------   -------
   (Loss) Income from continuing operations
      before fixed charges and income taxes       $11,472     $(21,266)  $ (87,968)  $53,680   $90,938
                                                  =======     ========   =========   =======   =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   0.96        (0.39)      (2.04)     1.23      1.96
</TABLE>


                                       43
MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO

SECRETARIA DE PRODUÇÃO E AGROENERGIA

Departamento da Cana-de-Açúcar e Agroenergia 

 m3

Safras 

Crop-years

Hidratado 

Hydrated

Anidro 

Anhydrous

Total 

Total

Var. % 

Variation %

97/98 9.722.534 5.699.719 15.422.253 6,87%

98/99 8.246.821 5.679.998 13.926.819 -9,70%

99/00 6.936.996 6.140.769 13.077.765 -6,10%

00/01 4.932.805 5.584.730 10.517.535 -19,58%

01/02 4.988.608 6.479.187 11.467.795 9,04%

02/03 5.476.363 7.009.063 12.485.426 8,87%

03/04 5.872.025 8.767.898 14.639.923 17,26%

04/05 7.035.421 8.172.488 15.207.909 3,88%

05/06 8.144.308 7.662.622 15.806.930 3,94%

06/07 9.853.835 8.077.816 17.931.651 13,44%

07/08 13.981.459 8.464.520 22.445.979 25,18%

08/09 18.050.758 9.630.481 27.681.239 23,32%

09/10(*) 16.607.017 6.086.801 22.693.818 -18,02%

Fonte: DCAA/SPAE/MAPA

(*) Posição em 01/12/2009 / Posicion of 12/01/2009

Produção Brasileira de Álcool 

Brazilian Ethanol Production 

3.000.000

8.000.000

13.000.000

18.000.000

23.000.000

28.000.000

03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09

Produção Brasileira de Álcool (m3) - Safras

Brazilian Ethanol Production (m3) - Crop-years 

Hidratado Hydrated

Anidro Anhydrous

Total Total

Setor Sucroalcooleiro -09-12-2009.xls 1 15/12/200909:31
<PAGE>   1
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Experts" and
"Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and to the use of our report dated
January 29, 1999, except Note 15, as to which the date is March 24, 1999, with
respect to the financial statements of SalesLogix Corporation included in the
Registration Statement (Form S-1) and in the related Prospectus of SalesLogix
Corporation for the registration of shares of its common stock.
 
     Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of SalesLogix
Corporation listed in Item 16(b). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
March 25, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:



| | (a) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                                       
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 28, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    CHARLES R. EYLER
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Charles R. Eyler Treasurer and Vice President, Finance
Before the First Division,

May 2, 1963

No. 67670.

#### Eugenio Mireles *v.*United States,

protest 329377-K (Laredo).

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to a certain commodity which was classified under the provision for “Barytes ore, crude or unmanufactured,” in paragraph 67 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by T.D. 54108, carrying a duty assessment of $2.85 per ton. Plaintiff claims that the goods are free of duty under the provision in paragraph 1719 of the Tariff Act of 1930, for crude minerals, not specially provided for.

*286Stipulated facts, upon which, the case has been submitted, show that the present merchandise is crude minerals, that it contains “less than 40 percent barium sulphate, more than 40 percent ferric oxide, with the remainder consisting of silica and calcium salts,” that the “said merchandise was not sought for its barium sulphate or for its ferric oxide content, but was sought for the specific gravity of the imported material in toto,” that “said merchandise was imported solely to be used as a weighting for coating pipe,” and that it “was not used for its barium sulphate or ferric oxide content. ” (R. 7.)

The agreed facts are sufficient to establish the correctness of plaintiff’s claim. Accordingly, we hold the merchandise in question to be free of duty under paragraph 1719, *supra,*as crude minerals, not specially provided for, as claimed.

The protest is sustained, and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 64676.

#### Mitteldorfer Straus, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/11480 (New York).

*311Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 85

Appointing the day for the convening of the second session of the One

Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Mr. ARMEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

JOINT RESOLUTION

Appointing the day for the convening of the second session

of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF SECOND SESSION OF

4 ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS.

5 The second regular session of the One Hundred Sixth

6 Congress shall begin at noon on Monday, January 24,

7 2000.

8 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SESSION PRIOR TO CONVENING.

9 If the Speaker of the House of Representatives and

10 the Majority Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after con-
2

HJ 85 ATH

1 sultation with the Minority Leader of the House of Rep2 resentatives and the Minority Leader of the Senate, deter3 mine that it is in the public interest for the Members of

4 the House of Representatives and the Senate to reassem5 ble prior to the convening of the second regular session

6 of the One Hundred Sixth Congress as provided in section

7 1—

8 (1) the Speaker and Majority Leader shall so

9 notify their respective Members; and

10 (2) Congress shall reassemble at noon on the

11 second day after the Members are so notified.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18,

1999.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18118 and #18119; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-00192]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4734-DR), dated 08/31/2023.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Idalia.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/27/2023 through 09/04/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/16/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/29/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/31/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated 08/31/2023, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 11/29/2023.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-23747 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
No. 52439.

protests 134288-K, etc.(New York).

#### T. A. Desmond & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



            CONSENT OF MAULDIN & JENKINS, LLC, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our
report dated August 5, 1997, except for Note 10 as to which the date is March
18, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Addison
Structural Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and for each of
the years in the three year period ended June 30, 1997. We also consent to the
reference of our Firm under the caption "Experts" in the Prospectus.


                                             /s/ MAULDIN & JENKINS, LLC


Albany, Georgia
June 29, 1998
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /S/ Kenneth R. Hanks   
|                       |  | Kenneth R. Hanks       
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
A90A0053.

#### DRAKE v. CLUTTER.

(391 SE2d 473)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Paul Drake, filed suit against the appellee, Tracy Clutter, seeking to recover possession of a Ford Mustang automobile. At the conclusion of a non-jury trial, the trial court found that Glut*645ter was entitled to possession of the vehicle but ordered her to make regular lease payments to the appellant. The court entered its judgment on July 13, 1989, and on July 20, 1989, entered findings of fact and conclusions of law as an addendum to the judgment. The appellant filed a motion for new trial on July 27, 1989, and a hearing was scheduled on the motion for September 11, 1989. However, on September 7, 1989, prior to the scheduled hearing date, the appellant filed a notice of appeal. On September 11, 1989, the trial court dismissed the motion for new trial on the ground that it had lost jurisdiction of the case because of the filing of the notice of appeal. No appeal was taken from the latter order. *Held:*

Decided February 23, 1990.

*Oxendine & Associates, John W. Oxendine,*for appellant.

Tracy Clutter, *pro se.*

*Richardson, Chenggis & Constantinides, George G. Chenggis,*for appellee.

In *Dept. of Transp. v. Rudeseal,*148 Ga. App. 179, 180 (251 SE2d 11) (1978), we held that “ ‘[a] notice of appeal from the judgment, filed while a motion for new trial is pending, and unaccompanied by a proper certificate for immediate review, confers no jurisdiction in the appellate court and results in a dismissal of the appeal.’ ” While it follows that the trial court was mistaken in its conclusion that it had lost jurisdiction to rule on the motion for new trial in the present case, it also follows that we are without jurisdiction to consider the present appeal.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                             496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8320
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (184)
<INVENTORY>                                       9951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 20735
<PP&E>                                            7241
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        120
<COMMON>                                          1585
<OTHER-SE>                                       17372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33659
<SALES>                                          12960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12960
<CGS>                                             9978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (451)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (676)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (342)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1018)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 313

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the brutal killing of

Mr. Matthew Shepard.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 2), 1998

Mr. THOMAS (for himself and Mr. ENZI) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the brutal

killing of Mr. Matthew Shepard.

Whereas Mr. Matthew Shepard, a 21-year-old student at the

University of Wyoming in Laramie, Wyoming, was physically beaten and tortured, tied to a wooden fence and

left for dead; and

Whereas Mr. Matthew Shepard died as a result of his injuries

on October 12, 1998, in a Colorado hospital, surrounded

by his loving family and friends: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate, That it is the sense of the

2 Senate that it—

3 (1) condemns the actions which occurred in

4 Laramie, Wyoming, as unacceptable and outrageous;
2

SRES 313 ATS

1 (2) urges each member of Congress and every

2 citizen of the United States, in his or her own way,

3 through his or her church, synagogue, mosque,

4 workplace, or social organization, to join in denounc5 ing and encouraging others to denounce this out6 rageous murder of another human being;

7 (3) pledges to join in efforts to bring an end to

8 such crimes, and to encourage all Americans to dedi9 cate themselves to ending violence in the United

10 States; and

11 (4) pledges to do everything in its power to

12 fight prejudice and intolerance that leads to the

13 murder of innocent people.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, PAR 20-103: Collaborative Program Grant for Multidisciplinary Teams (RM1), November 03, 2023, 10:00 a.m. to November 03, 2023, 06:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 05, 2023, 88 FR 69211, Doc 2023-22116.                 

This meeting is being amended to change the meeting panel name to PAR 23-077: Collaborative Program Grant for Multidisciplinary Teams (RM1). The old name contains an old PAR number: PAR 20-103. The meeting is closed to the public.

      ( print page 74199)    
 Dated: October 24, 2023. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-23811 Filed 10-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 115

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by striking
2

•HJ 115 EH

1 the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ‘‘October

2 26, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 25,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 115

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.
Exhibit 99.4  -  Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders as of December 31, 2005
STRUCTURED ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUSTMORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATESSERIES 2005-16XS
Beginning
Principal
Interest
Ending
Class
Balance
Distributed
Distributed
Balance
A1
471,836,000.00
78,236,080.80
7,852,643.58
393,599,919.20
A2A
200,000,000.00
33,162,404.22
3,805,674.85
166,837,595.78
A2B
64,077,000.00
10,624,736.88
1,079,217.71
53,452,263.12
A3
88,256,000.00
14,633,905.74
1,504,084.06
73,622,094.26
M1
45,736,000.00
0.00
884,092.76
45,736,000.00
M2
18,113,000.00
0.00
369,472.37
18,113,000.00
M3
14,943,000.00
0.00
324,657.10
14,943,000.00
X
905,680,994.42
0.00
0.00
771,540,657.08
R
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
No. 57539.

#### John S. Connor *v.*United States,

protest 194530-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.