UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 

18 CFR Part 385 

(Docket No. RM05-33-001) 

Revision of Rules of Practice and Procedure Regarding Issue Identification 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Final Rule. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is revising 

its regulations regarding pleadings. The regulations are revised to eliminate, in all 

pleadings except requests for rehearing, a recent formatting requirement that the 

pleadings contain a section entitled “Statement of Issues.” 

 

EFFECTIVE DATE: The rule will become effective [upon publication in the 

FEDERAL REGISTER].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carol C. Johnson 

Office of the General Counsel, GC-10 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

888 First Street, NE 

Washington, DC 20426 

202-502-8521 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 

Before Commissioners: Joseph T. Kelliher, Chairman; 

 Nora Mead Brownell, and Suedeen G. Kelly. 

Revision of Rules of Practice and Procedure Docket No. RM05-33-001 

 Regarding Issue Identification 

ORDER NO. 663-A 

 FINAL RULE 

( Issued March 17, 2006) 

1. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is revising its rules 

of practice and procedure to eliminate for all pleadings, except requests for rehearing, 

a recent change in Order No. 663 requiring that any issues a filer wishes the 

Commission to address be clearly set forth in a section of the pleading entitled 

“Statement of Issues” and that “any issue not so listed will be deemed waived.”1

 

Several months of experience under the new rule has indicated that it is not necessary 

in the context of all pleadings; however the Commission is retaining the requirement 

as it applies to Rule 713, request for rehearing. 

2. In Order No. 663, the Commission stated that it believed the changes to 

18 CFR 385.203(a)(7) and 385.713 would benefit both the Commission and 

 

1 Revision of Rules of Practice and Procedure Regarding Issue Identification, 

Order No. 663, 70 FR 55723 at P 5 (Sept. 23, 2005), III FERC Stats. & Regs. 

¶ 31,193 (Sept. 16, 2005). 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 2 -

participants by providing certainty with respect to issues being raised. In the 

meantime, the requirement for a “Statement of Issues” section has not proven 

particularly helpful for a number of common pleadings, and has led to confusion on 

the part of filers. For instance, many motions to intervene do not contest specific 

issues in the pleadings. Filers in those types of situations have puzzled over what 

information, if any, belongs in a Statement of Issues for their motion to intervene. To 

eliminate this confusion and simplify the pleadings format, the requirement for a 

separate Statement of Issues section is being eliminated from Rule 203. Parties will 

not be prejudiced by this formatting change, given that § 385.203(a)(7) will maintain 

its original requirement that pleadings include, as appropriate, “[t]he position taken by 

the participant filing any pleading, to the extent known when the pleading is filed, and 

the basis in fact and law for such position . . . .” This will provide adequate notice for 

the issues raised in the pleadings. This rule deletes the following language from § 

385.203(a)(7): “including a separate section entitled ‘Statement of Issues,’ listing 

each issue presented to the Commission in a separately enumerated paragraph that 

includes representative Commission and court precedent on which the participant is 

relying; any issue not so listed will be deemed waived.” 

3. However, the Commission finds that a “Statement of Issues” requirement is 

necessary in the context of requests for rehearing. Requiring the party seeking 

rehearing to specify each issue being raised in a separate paragraph benefits the 

Commission by clarifying the issues it needs to address on rehearing. More 

importantly, it benefits parties seeking rehearing. As noted in Order No. 663, both the 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 3 -

Natural Gas Act and Federal Power Act mandate that issues be raised on rehearing as 

a jurisdictional prerequisite to obtaining judicial review of a Commission order.2

 

Order No. 663 at P 4. Courts have found no jurisdiction to address issues that were 

not raised on rehearing.3

 Therefore, the requirement for a separate section 

specifically enumerating issues raised on rehearing benefits parties seeking rehearing 

because it prevents them from having cases denied on appeal for failure to clearly 

raise the issue at the administrative level. 

4. Moreover, requiring all issues to be set forth with specificity in separately 

enumerated paragraphs helps to ensure that the Commission will adequately address 

the issues raised in the rehearing request for purposes of judicial review. As noted in 

Order No. 663, there are numerous instances where appeals were denied because the 

 2

 Section 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717r(b), states that “No 

objection to the order of the Commission shall be considered by the court unless such 

objection shall have been urged before the Commission in the application for 

rehearing unless there is reasonable ground for failure to do so.” Section 313(a) of the 

Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825l(a) states that “The application for rehearing shall 

set forth specifically the ground or grounds upon which such application is based. . . . 

No proceeding to review any orders of the Commission shall be brought by any 

person unless such person shall have made application to the Commission for a 

rehearing thereon.” 

3 See DTE Energy Co. v. FERC, 394 F.3d 954, 960 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (finding 

petitioner’s failure to seek rehearing “fatal” to its court challenge, noting that “[t]he 

mandatory requirement of filing a petition for rehearing is designed to afford the 

Commission an opportunity to invoke its expertise or to correct any errors prior to 

judicial review”); Fuel Safe Washington v. FERC, 389 F.3d 1313 (10th Cir. 2004) 

(“‘the presentation of a ground of objection in an application for rehearing by the 

Commission is an indispensable prerequisite to the exercise of power of judicial 

review of the order on such ground,’” quoting Pan Am Petroleum Corp. v. FPC, 

268 F.2d 827, 830 (10th Cir. 1959)). 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 4 -

court found that a petitioner’s position was not clearly articulated before the 

Commission.4

 

5. This final rule also amends the language in Rule 713 to account for the 

now-eliminated requirement in Rule 203(a) to include a “Statement of Issues” section. 

Current Rule 713 states that requests for rehearing must “[c]onform to the 

requirements in Rule 203(a), which are applicable to pleadings, including, but not 

limited to, the requirement for a separate section entitled ‘Statement of Issues,’ listing 

each issue in a separately enumerated paragraph that includes representative 

Commission and court precedent on which the party is relying; and . . . .”5

 This 

section is being revised to state that requests for rehearing must “[c]onform to the 

requirements in Rule 203(a), which are applicable to pleadings, and, in addition, 

include a separate section entitled ‘Statement of Issues,’ listing each issue in a 

 4 See, e.g., Intermountain Municipal Gas v. FERC, 326 F.3d 1282 at 1285 

(D.C. Cir. 2003) (finding no jurisdiction because “so general and vague a statement” 

in a petition for rehearing fails to meet the requirement in section 19(b) of the Natural 

Gas Act, which requires that objections be “‘specifically urged,’” quoting Louisiana 

Interstate Gas Corp. v. FERC, 962 F.2d 37, 41 (D. C. Cir. 1992)); California Dep’t of 

Water Resources v. FERC, 341 F.3d 906, 911(9th Cir. 2003) (issue not preserved for 

review where petitioner “raised the issue in a single sentence at the end of an 

unrelated section of its request for rehearing, without citing the statutory language it 

now urges [the court] to consider”), reh’g en banc denied, 361 F.3d 517 (2004); 

California Dep’t of Water v. FERC, 306 F.3d 1121, 1126 (D. C. Cir. 2002) (court 

dismisses petition for judicial review because issue raised in a footnote “does not 

properly present, and thus does not preserve, the issue the intervenors wish to argue”); 

and Coalition for the Fair and Equitable Regulation of Docks on the Lake of the 

Ozarks v. FERC, 297 F.3d 771, 777 (8th Cir. 2002) (declining to find jurisdiction 

where petitioner’s “brief does not show that it raised the . . . arguments in any 

recognizable form”), reh’g en banc denied, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21769 (8th Cir. 

Oct. 17, 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 960 (2003). 

5

 18 CFR 385.713(c)(2), as modified by Order No. 663, P 6. 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 5 -

separately enumerated paragraph that includes representative Commission and court 

precedent on which the party is relying; any issue not so listed will be deemed 

waived; and . . . .” 

6. The rehearing rule at § 385.713(c)(2) continues to specify that issues not so 

raised will be deemed to have been waived. As noted in Order No. 663 at P 7, this is 

consistent with existing Rule 2001, which states that filings that fail to meet 

applicable statutes, rules or orders may be rejected in full or all or part of the filing 

may be stricken.6

7. The revisions adopted in this rule are more appropriately characterized as a 

clarification of the Commission’s rules rather than a change in Commission policy or 

a significant revision of the existing rules of practice and procedure. Rule 713, prior 

to the enactment of Order No. 663, required parties filing for rehearing to “state 

concisely the alleged error in the final decision or final order.” However, Rule 713 

was neither adhered to uniformly nor applied in pleadings consistently. Therefore, we 

are requiring that all rehearing requests include a separately designated section and an 

itemized and enumerated Statement of Issues, which will help eliminate ambiguities 

among parties, the Commission, and the reviewing courts, as discussed above. 

8. The changes that are made in this rule eliminate one requirement in Rule 

203(a)(7) and make necessary amendments to Rule 713(c)(2) to reflect the change in 

Rule 203(a)(7). 

 6

 18 CFR 385.2001(b)(2005). 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 6 -

Information Collection Statement

9. The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB’s) regulations require that 

OMB approve certain information collection requirements imposed by agency rule. 

5 CFR 1320.12 (2005). This Final Rule contains no additional information reporting 

requirements, and is not subject to OMB approval. 

Environmental Analysis

10. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an 

Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant adverse 

effect on the human environment.7

 The Commission has categorically excluded 

certain actions from this requirement as not having a significant effect on the human 

environment. Included in the exclusion are rules that are clarifying, corrective, or 

procedural that do not substantially change the effect of the regulations being 

amended. This rule is procedural in nature and, therefore, falls under this exception; 

consequently, no environmental consideration is necessary. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

11. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)8

 generally requires a description 

and analysis of final rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. The Commission is not required to make such analysis if a 

rule would not have such an effect. The Commission certifies that this rule will not 

 7 Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, Order No. 

486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs. Preambles 1986-1990 

¶ 30,783 (1987). 

8

 5 U.S.C. 601-612 (1994). 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 7 -

have such an impact on small entities as it merely clarifies existing requirements. An 

analysis under the RFA, therefore, is not required. 

Document Availability

12. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, 

the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print 

the contents of this document via the Internet through FERC's Home Page 

(http://www.ferc.gov) under “What’s New” and in FERC's Public Reference Room 

during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street, 

N.E., Room 2A, Washington, D.C. 20426. 

13. From FERC's Home Page on the Internet, this information is available in the 

Commission’s document management system, eLibrary. The full text of this 

document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, 

printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket 

number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket number field. 

14. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the FERC's website during normal 

business hours. For assistance, please contact the Commission’s Online Support at 1-

866-208-3673 (toll free) or 202-502-6652 (e-mail at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov) 

or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-8371, TTY (202)502-8659. E-Mail the 

Public Reference Room at public.referenceroom@ferc.gov. 

Effective Date

15. These regulations are effective immediately upon publication in the Federal 

Register. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 553(d)(3), the Commission finds that good 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 8 -

cause exists to make this Final Rule effective immediately upon publication. It 

concerns only a matter of procedure eliminating a requirement affecting formatting of 

filings. 

16. The provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 801 regarding Congressional review of Final 

Rules does not apply to this Final Rule, because the rule concerns agency procedure 

and practice and will not substantially affect the rights of non-agency parties. 

17. The Commission is issuing this as a final rule without a period for public 

comment. Under 5 U.S.C. § 553(b), notice and comment procedures are unnecessary 

where a rulemaking concerns only agency procedure and practice, or where the 

agency finds that notice and comment is unnecessary. This rule concerns only a 

clarification of a matter of agency procedure and will not significantly affect regulated 

entities or the general public. 

List of subjects in 18 CFR Part 385

 Administrative practice and procedure, Electric utilities, Penalties, Pipelines, 

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 

By the Commission. 

( S E A L ) 

 Magalie R. Salas, 

 Secretary. 
Docket No. RM05-33-001 - 9 -

 In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission amends Part 385, Chapter I, 

Title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows. 

PART 385 – RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 

1. The authority citation for part 385 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 551-557; 15 U.S.C. 717-717z; 3301-3432; 16 U.S.C. 

791a-825r; 2601-2645; 28 U.S.C. 2461; 31 U.S.C. 3701, 9701; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352; 

49 U.S.C. 60502; 49 App. U.S.C. 1085 (1988). 

2. Section 385.203 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(7) to read as follows: 

§ 385.203 Content of pleadings and tariff or rate filings (Rule 203). 

 (a) * * * 

 (7) The position taken by the participant filing any pleading, to the extent 

known when the pleading is filed, and the basis in fact and law for such position; 

* * * * * 

3. Section 385.713 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows: 

§ 385.713 Request for rehearing (Rule 713). 

* * * * * 

 (c) * * * 

 (2) Conform to the requirements in Rule 203(a), which are applicable to 

pleadings, and, in addition, include a separate section entitled “Statement of Issues,” 

listing each issue in a separately enumerated paragraph that includes representative 

Commission and court precedent on which the party is relying; any issue not so listed 

will be deemed waived; and 

* * * * *