alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION  I, Peter Toscano, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A2 of International Power Group, Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 23, 2007 /s/ Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            8028
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            6000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     144467
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           75802
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             75748
<LOANS>                                         104339
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  349180
<DEPOSITS>                                      313023
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3570
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10800
<OTHER-SE>                                       21787
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  349180
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   4224
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 6999
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11223
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                5821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5847
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5376
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      170
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (64)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2033
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2033
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                         92
<LOANS-PAST>                                        18
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1146
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      176
<RECOVERIES>                                        56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1196
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1196
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
             THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
             FROM THE SECOND QUARTER 10-QSB FOR INSCI'S 1999 FISCAL YEAR
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000878612
<NAME>              m7rpwrt@
       
<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                      SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                    1593
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             2626
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               100
<INVENTORY>                                                                 50
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          4303
<PP&E>                                                                    2683
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            1947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                            7388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     2950
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 21
<COMMON>                                                                    71
<OTHER-SE>                                                                4346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                              7388
<SALES>                                                                   5509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          5509
<CGS>                                                                     2266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             2266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          3952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         (45)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           (664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       (664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              (664)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (0.14)
        


</TABLE>
5596 Haven Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Telephone 702-736-0606 

 www.sundancehelicopters.com 

Sundance Helicopters, Inc. requests exemption from that part of 14 CFR Part 93.323 which 

requires the filing of daily flight plans prior to conducting operations in the vicinity of Grand 

Canyon National Park (GCNP), AZ. The pertinent parts of the “Las Vegas Flight Standards 

District Office Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area Procedures Manual” will 

continue to be adhered to regarding reporting on a quarterly basis until the referenced document 

is revised or rescinded. 

The following is submitted as justification for issuance of the requested exemption: 

1. The filing of flight plans prior to operation within the GCNP area is required for allocation use 

monitoring and not for safety of flight. No flight locating or following is afforded by the current 

daily flight plan submission requirement. 

2. The filing of referenced flight plans is an exact duplication of the information contained in 

quarterly GCNP operations reporting required by the “Las Vegas Flight Standards District Office 

Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area Procedures Manual”. 

3. Our demonstrated method of quarterly allocation use reporting, verification, and possible audit 

options provides for more than adequate oversight by the responsible agency. 

4. Although, to the untrained eye, there is no apparent benefit to the flying public, Sundance 

flight locating/following is conducted in-house using the satellite based tracking system 

“Spidertracks”. This method of flight locating provides superior safety when compared to the 

FAA Flight Plan method of flight following using a VFR flight plan affording a greater level of 

safety to the flying public. 

5. A summary of this request is: 

1. Sundance Helicopters, Inc. requests exemption from a part of 14 CFR Part 93.323. 

2. Sundance Helicopters, Inc. seeks relief from the requirement to file VFR flight plans 

prior to conducting operations in the Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP), AZ. 

3. The requirement to file flight plans is not intended for safety of flight, but is used as a 

reporting vehicle for allocation use in the GCNP. 

4. The allocation information provided by the flight plan filing is duplicated in a quarterly 

report that is required to be filed by operators in the area of the GCNP. 

5. Company methods of data collection for allocation use reporting on a quarterly basis 

are transparent and allow for easy audit and validation of reported data at any time. 

6. The satellite based tracking system used by Sundance Helicopters, Inc. for flight 

locating affords the flying public greater safety of flight than using the flight plan 

filing/flight following method used by the FAA. Constant reporting of aircraft locations 

by the tracking system allows Sundance Helicopters to know exactly where all company 

aircraft are located at any given time. 

Kurt Barton, Director of Operations, Sundance Helicopters, Inc., 5596 Haven St., Las Vegas, NV 

89119, (702) 736-0606 ext. 260, Fax (702) 736-4107
Case No. 18,651.

#### SUTTON v. MANDEVILLE.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 187.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1804.

Trial — Right to Open and Close — Bankruptcy —Bond—Malice.

1. The defendant has not a right to open the cause in all cases where he holds the affirmative of the issue.

2. Malice may be given in evidence in aggravation of damages in an action upon a bond conditioned co prove the plaintiff a bankrupt.

3. Evidence cannot be given to show that the commissioners of bankruptcy erred in their judgment. *472[See Cases Nos. 13,048-13,650.]

*471Debt on bond conditioned to prove plaintiff a bankrupt. Plea, conditions performed. Replication. Breach, that defendant [Joseph Mandeville] did not prove plaintiff to be a bankrupt. Rejoinder, that he did prove him to be a bankrupt. Surrejoinder, that he did not; and tenders issue Rebutter, joins the issue.

Mr. Swann, for defendant,

contended that he had a right to open the cause, because he held the affirmative, to wit: that he did prove plaintiff a bankrupt.

THE COURT, however, refused to permit him, because the replication is in nature of a new declaration; and the rejoinder is only a denial of the fact charged in the replication.

CRANCH. Circuit Judge, contra, because the defendant is entitled to show that he did prove the plaintiff to be a bankrupt and it is only upon the supposition that he has failed to support the issue on his part, that the plaintiff can consistently introduce evidence of the damages sustained by him.

C. Lee, for defendant,

as this was not an action for a malicious prosecution, prayed the opinion of the court whether the plaintiff had a right to give evidence of malice in aggravation of damages.

THE COURT

said that the question was premature, until evidence of malice should be offered, when it might come properly before the court on an objection to the evidence. But THE COURT permitted the plaintiff to give evidence of fatigue, trouble, vexation and expenses occasioned by the attempt to prove him a bankrupt. And afterwards permitted the plaintiff to go into evidence of malice in aggravation of damages.

THE COURT also permitted the defendant to give evidence of the circumstances and conduct of John Sutton, which would have *472amounted to acts of bankruptcy, if he had been a proper subject of the bankrupt law, in mitigation of damages and to repel the suggestion of malice. But refused to admit evidence that the commissioners of bankruptcy had erred in their judgment.
Before the Second Division, December 20, 1944

December 20, 1944

No. 49882.

#### Protest 109328-K of L. E. McCullough *&*Co. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Counsel agreed that the hats in question are the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 49035. In accordance therewith the claim at *12%*percent was sustained.
Order filed April 17, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01010-CV

___________

RON VILOTTI, Appellant

V.

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND CHICAGO 

TITLE COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 320790240

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the 240th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made 

arrangement’s for payment for the reporter’s record. On March 26, 2014, the clerk 

of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that 

do not require a reporter=s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, 

provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty 
days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,798
<INVENTORY>                                      7,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,515
<PP&E>                                          11,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,748
<BONDS>                                         22,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,107
<SALES>                                         31,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,580
<CGS>                                           13,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,454
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
#### Jones *vs.*The State of Georgia.

The engagement of counsel in other courts does not dispens.e with their attendance in this court. Those who are interested in its proceedings must give their attendance when their cases are called in their order. A case may be reinstated for providential cause, hut other grounds are not recognized. (Rep.)

April 27, 1888.

Practice in Supreme Court.

Reported in the decision.

F. R. Walker, for plaintiff in error.

O. D. Hill, solicitor-general, for the State.

*641Bleckley, Chief Justice.

On the call of this case, it was dismissed for want of • prosecution, on the 20th of April. Upon the 25th of April, counsel for the plaintiff in error appeared and moved to reinstate the case upon his affidavit, alleging, among other things, as follows:

> “ When said case was reached and called for trial in said Supreme Court, he was busily engaged preparing a case for James G, Leslie, who had just been convicted in the United States circuit court for uttering and passing counterfeit coin; said preparation having been ordered by the Honorable W. T. Newman, judge of the said court, presiding, on a motion in arrest of judgment upon certain grounds therein stated* and which motion was afterwards sustained by said court,”

To grant this motion would be to recognize the position that the engagement of counsel in other courts dispenses with their attendance in this court. This we cannot do. The court sits here for the transaction of the public business, and those who are interested in its proceedings must give their attendance when their cases are called in their order.

Providential cause has been recognized as a ground for reinstating a case after it was dismissed, but we are not aware that any other has been so recognized. *Ex parte Bradley*63 *Ga*566; *Osborn vs. Hale, 10 Ga.*731; *Brooks vs. The*State, 72 *Ga.*899. In fact, the point is absolutely controlled by an express rule of the court. Rule of February 7,1882, code, page 1361.

Motion denied.
No. 51527.

#### Protests 722223-G, etc., of Tacoma Oriental Steamship Co. et al. (San Francisco and Seattle.)

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 59915.

#### Hoffer & Slone and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 196438-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chalk-white stones, faceted, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

January 11, 1951

No. 55092.

#### William V. Schmidt Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 165713-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the.subject of S. *Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
No. 54502.

#### Henry K. Wampole *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 146562-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
**UNITED
        STATES**
 **SECURITIES
        AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**
 **Washington,
        D.C. 20549**
 
 **FORM
        8-K**
 
 **CURRENT
        REPORT**
 **Pursuant
        to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934**
 
 **Date
        of Report (Date of earliest event reported):**June 14,
        2007
 
  CHINDEX
        INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 (Exact
        Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
 DELAWARE
              
              0-24624
              
              13-3097642(State
                  of Incorporation)
              
              (Commission
                  File Number)
              
              (IRS
                  Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 7201
                  WISCONSIN AVENUEBETHESDA,
                  MARYLAND
              
              
              20814(Address
                  of Principal Executive Offices)
              
              
              (Zip
                  Code)
  
 Registrant's
        telephone number, including area code:  (301) 215−7777
  Check
        the
        appropriate box below if the Form 8−K filing is intended to simultaneously
        satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
        provisions:
 
 [
        ]
        Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17
        CFR
        230.425)
 
 [
        ]
        Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a−12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
        240.14a−12)
 
 [
        ]
        Pre−commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d−2(b) under the Exchange Act
        (17 CFR 240.14d−2(b))
 
 [
        ]
        Pre−commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e−4(c) under the Exchange Act
        (17 CFR 240.13e−4(c))
  
  **Item
        8.01.****Other
        Events.**
  The
        Board
        of Directors of Chindex International, Inc. (the “Company”) has changed the date
        for the special meeting of the Company’s stockholders originally scheduled for
        Friday, June 29, 2007, to Monday, July 9, 2007.  The time, place and
        record date of June 7, 2007 remain the same.
  
  SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant
        to the requirements of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report
        to
        be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
        authorized.
 
   CHINDEX
                INTERNATIONAL,
                INC.Date:  June
                  14,
                  2007
              By:
              /s/ Lawrence
                PembleLawrence
                PembleChief
                Financial Officer