alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF** 
AUSTIN **‘ ,**  **GlillA ‘** **D 0.**  **MANN**
l-î .RIUL ,:;r:16, 1939.Mr. Gilbert Smith, April 6, 1939, i'ace2

extended the rule that even where there ls a specific 

### exoeptlonto the rule of' sore than one office of emoluwnt as in tfila

0898, cr where an office does not 

### pay for its servlces to the holder thereof, that where a pereon seeks to hold more than one civil oftlae end the duties of tP,et.we afrlcef8

are inooapatlble, that suoh a parsor;

cannct hold both oitices, and the anoeptanae of the latter, or later In point of time, is considered 

### a raeano7 or re8Qnatlon of the oiiioe 

### rormerl7held.

4pl7l1g 

### theme rules, the ooart.8 hare hold Ln ewe of Lucre rsi State, 63 SW Znd 696 that the jwtloa oi the peaoa can also ba a reoorder ln the Oorpor~tlon 

### ,coertcir

the olty as Artlole 16, Seation 60 Of tile. State Qooetittttion **doe8** 

### not **apply** 

### to ju8tloe8of tka *a88 

## and

thebuttis er thetwo ~ffloes are not iaoom- .pat$ble

ona to tlm 

### other. Ercm thou&atheI~two ofi ln ..tha lnqdry at hand, m&yor OS the OltiJ .OS~ 4luon aR4 j*tloe **of** the pea00 **oil proshot**  **Eo. OnCr** **oft .,;Taikm** Caimtr,, 

### Texas,ma7 be both olril &Vi&s8 of. emolument 

### 7et thla.. ~XWiSiOll Of 

### the &U38tik~tiOIl d-8 

### Wt **wp17** 

### to jWtiW8 

### of.,:he peaoe,uhtire

ena psr8oa oOea@ 

### hOl&.both~ OfiiOW **$a, ‘** **ti;a** dutties **of tlae**  **6ame, uory**  **iaaom~atibla** 

### OM **+o**

***** 

### Though the'

llna wblolx

biatlngal8he8~~oompa~lble aria Iioorapatlbla

datfee Of 8OpcWet.e Offi 18 8aPlCttiu8 

### dir and dlffloultto dl8tlqumi yet w are Of the 

### oplnIon that 

### the two oftioe8 OS ra7Or and jU8tiOO 

### Of the peaoe l re,not 1naaPpatlbXe one **,to** 

### tha other and that the 

### aama person oan holU both effXoe8 at the lraae tf.ma. .;' Offloes are 

### lnaompetible ubem t~::.d?@iO8 

### 'are or ~a7 be lnaonslstent or ocmfllotlnng, **bat,net jhsra**  

### their duties ara wholly unrelated,Or %n no maiiaarIneon818t8nt 

### and are newr in oontliot,and whera neitherOffioer fe 

### aoooantableor.undarthe dqainlonOf; or m&ordinate to, the other, or ha8 am7 right or pow8r 

### to ~nterfexbrith the other in the perfomaaoe Of any d&7. Stat4VII**Xartln, 51**  

### SI 2nd 815, Kugle 

### ts. Cleurose IntIepJn4ent Sohool Dlstrlot,50 SW Find 3?6, Thomas vs. Abernath7County Line Independent School Nstrlat, P;90 SW 158, 

### Ter. **J ’** **tu.**0. Gilbert Smith, April 6, 1939, Page 3

Vol. 34, page 951.

In vler of the foregoing authorities, you are respectfully s&vised t&t it is the opinion of this Departsent t2at a citizen of Anson can hold both the offloee Of mayor findjUBtia0 Of the peace Of preOinCt one Of Jonee County 6t the aeme tlm.

Trusting that 

### the foregoinganawerayear lnrltllry, we remain Vary truly your8

ArdellVllllcuu ii88i8tlh
No. 53883.

#### Baxter Importers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 102105-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Eicwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 396 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 396

  Celebrating the birth of James Madison and his contributions to the 
                                Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2000

  Mr. Bliley submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Celebrating the birth of James Madison and his contributions to the 
                                Nation.

Whereas March 16, 2001, is the 250th anniversary of the birth of James Madison, 
        Father of the United States Constitution and fourth President of the 
        United States;
Whereas the ideals of James Madison, as expressed in the Constitution he 
        conceived for the American Nation and in the principles of freedom he 
        established in the Bill of Rights, are the foundations of American 
        Government and life;
Whereas James Madison's lifetime of public service, as a member of the Virginia 
        House of Delegates, as a delegate to the Continental Congress during the 
        American Revolution, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in 
        1787, as a leader in the House of Representatives, as Secretary of 
        State, and as the Nation's fourth President, are an inspiration to all 
        men, women, and children in the conduct of their personal and private 
        lives; and
Whereas the ideals and inspiring example of James Madison are of utmost 
        importance to the future of the American Nation as it enters a new 
        millennium: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the historical significance of James 
        Madison's birth, as well as his contributions to the Nation 
        during his lifetime;
            (2) urges all American patriotic and civil associations, 
        labor organizations, schools, universities, historical 
        societies, and communities of learning and worship, together 
        with citizens throughout the United States, to develop 
        appropriate programs and educational activities to recognize 
        and celebrate the life and achievements of James Madison; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        recognizing the 250th anniversary of the birth of James Madison 
        and calling upon the people of the United States to observe the 
        life and legacy of James Madison with appropriate ceremonies 
        and activities.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20032

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARNOLD WAYNE ROLLINGS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-252-ALL

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arnold Wayne Rollings

presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States

v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce

Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 9, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
P A

N J N Y

M E N H V T M A C T

R

INDSDNEKS

M N

I A
M O

I L W

I

I N

O

H M

ICensus Regions and Divisions of the United StatesPACIFICAK0 200 400 MilesTXOK

A R L A

M S

A L

G

A

F L S C T N

N

C K Y

W V

V A M D D C

D E E A S T N O R T H C E N T R A L

MI D D L E A T L A N T

I C S O U T H A T L A N T

I C E A S T S O U T H C E N T R A LWESTSOUTHCENTRALWESTNORTHCENTRAL0 200 400 MilesHIPACIFIC0 100 200 Miles

W A

M T W Y I D O R C A

N V

U T

C O N M A Z

M O U N T A

I N P A C

I FI C

W E S TMIDWEST

N O R T H E A S T S O U T HU.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census BureauPrepared by the Geography DivisionLEGEND



### N E W E N G L A N DREGIONDIVISIONSTATE

# U.S. Census Bureau Census Bureau Regions and Divisions with State FIPS Codes

Region I: Northeast

Region 2: Midwest*

Region 3: South

Region 4: West **Division I: New England**  **Division 2: Middle Atlantic** 

**Division 3: East North Central**  **Division 4: West North Central** 

**Division 5: South Atlantic**  **Division 6: East South Central**  **Division 7: West South Central** 

**Division 9: Pacific** 

*Prior to June 1984, the Midwest Region was designated as the North Central Region. 

# A r i z ona ( 04) Colo r ado	(08) Idaho	 (16) N e w M e xico	(35) Montana (30) Utah	 (49) N e v ada (32) Wy oming (56) **Division 8:**

**Mountain** Del a w are	(10) Dist r ict of Columbia	(11) Flo r ida 	(12) Georgia (13) Ma r yland 	(24) No r th Carolina (37) South Carolina (45) Virginia (51) W est Virginia	 (54)

Alaska 	(02) Cali f o r nia	(06) H a w aii	 (15) Oregon	 (41) W ashington	(53) Alabama	(01) K entu c ky	(21) Mississippi	(28) T

ennessee	(47) A r kansas	(05) Louisiana	(22) Oklahoma	(40) T

e xas	 (48) Indiana (18) Illinois (17) Michigan	(26) Ohio (	39) Wisconsin	(55) I ow a	 (19) Nebr aska	(31) Kansas 	(20) Nor th Da k ota	(38) Minnesota	(27) South Dak ota	(46) Missou r i (29) Connecticut	(09) Maine 	(23) Massachusetts (25) N e w Hampshire 	(33) Rhode Island 	(44) V e r mont (50) N e w Jers e y	(34) N e w Y o r k	(36) P ennsyl v ania	(42)
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Brent Suen, the Chief Executive Officer ofWEYLAND TECH, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:  1. The Companys amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 20th day of November, 2018.  /s/ Brent SuenBrent SuenChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WEYLAND TECH, INC. and will be retained byWEYLAND TECH, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**IN RE: ADOPTION OF S.R., A MINOR**

**CHILD**

**PETITION OF: A.R., NATURAL FATHER :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 205 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 5th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74225-74226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 2, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.

[[Page 74226]]

    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: October 26, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24019 Filed 10-26-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
    <MULTIPLIER>                1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1998
    <PERIOD-START>                             Jan-1-1999
    <PERIOD-END>                              Mar-31-1999
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
    <CASH>                                            576
    <SECURITIES>                                  537,516
    <RECEIVABLES>                                 131,220
    <ALLOWANCES>                                        0
    <INVENTORY>                                         0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
    <PP&E>                                              0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                      0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                699,312
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         488,498
    <BONDS>                                             0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
    <PREFERRED>                                         0
    <COMMON>                                      303,584
    <OTHER-SE>                                  (122,770)
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  669,312
    <SALES>                                             0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,208
    <CGS>                                               0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,350
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              7,123
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,735
    <INCOME-TAX>                                        0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             6,735
    <DISCONTINUED>                                      0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
    <CHANGES>                                           0
    <NET-INCOME>                                    6,735
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.33
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.33
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital  Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/S/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andPrincipal Executive Officer of InLand Capital  Fund, L.PDate:May 11, 2007
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 93

Providing for the appointment of Alan G. Spoon as a citizen regent of

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 2000

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself and Mr. REGULA) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House

Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Alan G. Spoon as a citizen

regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the resignation of Louis Gerstner of New York,

8 is filled by the appointment of Alan G. Spoon of Maryland.
2

•HJ 93 IH

1 The appointment is for a term of six years and shall take

2 effect on the date of enactment of this joint resolution.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  610,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (129,664)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               679,656
<PP&E>                                       1,302,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                (642,408)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,312,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,491,992
<BONDS>                                      3,193,615
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,068
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,254,185)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,312,875
<SALES>                                     14,194,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,194,877
<CGS>                                       12,924,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,956,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               543,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (129,664)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             261,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,337,451)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,337,451)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,337,451)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)



</TABLE>
No. 67251.

protests 60/19692 and 61/8802 (Galveston).

#### Falcon Sales Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 19, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00091

- CV

Matthew L. WEBB, Appellant

v.

HEB LP., Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI00522 Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Matthew L. Webb filed a n original petition in the trial court seeking authorization for a

pre

- suit deposition under Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure

. O n January 22, 2020

, the trial court signed an order denying the petition. On February 10, 2020, Webb filed a notice of appeal

. On February 18, 2020, a ppellant filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of this appeal, but he subsequently rescinded th is motion

. On February 20, 2020, the clerk ’s record was

filed. 1

We question our jurisdiction over this appeal. “ A ruling on a Rule 202 petition constitutes a final, appealable order only if the petition seeks discovery from a third party against whom a suit is not contemplated, but a Rule 202 ruling is interlocutory and does not constitute a final, appealable order if discovery is sought from a person against whom litigation is either pending or contemplated. ” Sossam o n v. Bardin , No. 11

- 12

- 00164

- CV, 2012 WL 3537817, at*1 (Tex. App.

— Eastland 201 2, no pet.) (citing Thomas v. Fitzgerald, 166 S.W.3d 746 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2005, no pet.) )

. Here, Webb’s Rule 202 petition sought to depose an HEB, LP pharmacy employee

, and it appears from the petition that Webb contemplated litigation against HEB, LP

. Therefore, the trial court’s January 22, 2020 order appears to be interlocutory in nature and we

appear to lack jurisdiction over this appeal.

1 Both parties have filed briefs in this appeal; however, this briefing is premature. In addition to the question of our jurisdiction , a ppellant has requested the preparation of the reporter’s record and it has not yet been filed.We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by April 3, 2020 why this

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend all appellate deadlines pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
No. 56209.

protest 171433-K (Los Angeles).

#### Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.