alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 4 

# JACK BROOKS REGIONALAIRPORT**00111~1\0llli!U\1** UJ.llnGP.U UlrlliQ 

## INTRODUCTORYLETTER**_4~** JACK BROOi<S

### ~ REGIONALAIRPORT



### ,.

Honorable Raymond H. LaHood Secre;aryof Trar.sp()r.ai:on 

### lJ S Oepa·tment ofTransponation 

### 1200 Naw JerseyAvenue SE Wasl'.ington. 

### CC 20590 4875 PARKFR CIW" 8EI<U.,10NT, 

### IX TII05 rH: (.tC9j 

### 719-4000**F~x·** 

### {409! n2-2830

Rt: SeaumontfPort

### Arthur Jack. Orooks Reglor31 Airc·:lrt 

### Small Community

### Air Service De'lelopment Gra1t Proposal Oaar Secretary 

### LaHoo:l: Bea•.lrront.'f"ort Artrmr Jack Hrnoks Regi.Jnal Airport s submitting. :1e at:ached pro:::osal fer 

### lund1ng under the Small Community Air Ser.ice Ce•1elopment Program. and ll'e 

### p-oposal for 

### OeaumontlPort Arthur Jack Brooks 

### Reg:onal Ai-port rreets the eligibility requirements 

### of :he program. We are 

### proposing a orojectthat would e1able the Airport tc de•Jelop Md i"'llpleme!'lt a Marketing

. and advertising program to promote use of the 

### eorrmunit'j's oxistirg air service ara ret;un 

### a r



### . servace over the long-term. Currentl!', 

### t11c community's air 

### service is operated b;·**llni:e~** 

### Express ta United's hJb at Houston lntei-continental Airport. The s-ervice is CJtmntly oper:ite<l by Colgan Air using Saao 3-«1 turboprop a·r::raft, and Colaan 

### is 

### ::;Ianning to 

### retire it9 .f'eet of Saab aircraft in the near future. Forh

..**natt~ly.** Un ted prars to replace the Saab se!"o'::;e with 

### service operated 

### by re-alona. 

### jets. Successful implerrentation 

## o' the**p~oposed** 

### anar1<eting and advertising program 

### st.ould**~educe** t·1e number of passengats leaking :o tho airports in Houston. Althcugh 

### demand has beer, estimated at more than 1,6-:iO passengers per day each way, less than 40 passengers per

## day each wa'/ are using the air service avai**~tble** ttl our 

### local airport. Urited Is taking a Sl>bstantial hnancral nsk 10 

### upgra::a the turboprop sarvice to regional jet service, and mo·e traffic; must be 

### generated toensJre the regional jet service is a financial success. Tr;e level 

### or :raffic currently using**13eaumor.t/Po~** Arthur's existing air service will sirr.pl'; 11at be**su~:ci~r)l** lc SJp::.ort**~eglonill** jetservice ever the tong-terrr. Stnlil·l CommJnity Air**Ser~i::e** 

### Development F:.mding is es.sentral to the 

### r;crnn·ur.itys goal of er.sur.ng :tiecommunir; wi I retain 

### its air service. 

### the cl'>mrnunity is appreciative ofthe**oppo1.unit~·** to submt this proposal. a11d 

### we look 

### ror.vard to 

### the oossibilito{ of a grant awar.::. Sih:erel;•, • 

# ,-y < /1 _./ 

# •11.. I 

# ".;Ji'·Jvrf;t·JJ) 

# ·rr..x[lil{'tl·Y.b.r

Jer.nifer

# l. Hoga:1cam::, C.M.

. 

### 1\ rport Director 

### 3eaunontiPort 

### Arthur Jack 

### Brooks Regional 

### Airport



### Jack Brooks Regional Airport; Beaumont, Texas Proposal Underthe Small Community Air Service Development Program; Docket DOT -OST-2012-0069 

# s10-120622-006 4
# Official Journal C 137A/19 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 137A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5919 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 137A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5919 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 137A/1 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/301/15 — Administrators (AD 5) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2016/C 137A/1

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/301/15 — Administrators (AD 5)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report Fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results      of operations of the Company. |

| Dated: | July 14, 2008 | By:*/s/ Scott D. Allen*            |
|--------|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |          | Scott D. Allen                                                                            |
|   |          | Chief Financial Officer                                                                   |
Before the Third Division,

March 27, 1961

No. 65336.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. and H. W. Ebert Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/4117 and 59/22935 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those *389the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 63973.

protest 59/19173 (New York).

#### Vandegrift Forwarding Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00361

- CV

Accident Fund General Insurance Company v. Rodrigo Mendiola

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018CCV

- 62211

- 3

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decisio n certified below for observance. October 12, 2023
Greg: 

Our intent in OTM-28 and the proposed revision to Method 202 was that emissions sources that were essentially 

identical in design and operational characteristics and were tested during the same sampling campaign needed 

only one field blank and the hardware preparation indicated in the method did not have to be repeated for each 

stack/source. Should you need to use reagents from multiple lots, you should get residues for each of the lots 

rather than trust that the supplier is providing you a consistent product. 

_________________________________

Ron Myers 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policy and Programs Division 

Monitoring Policy Group, D243-05 

RTP NC 27711 

Tel. 919.541.5407 

Fax 919.541.1039 

E-mail myers.ron@epa.gov 

Mr. Myers: 

If a site contains four flues in a common stack, is each flue required 

to be treated as a new source category? If the boilers operate with the 

same coal, can one field blank be used for all four flues? One more 

question. For a project that will be running nine tests on four flues, 

is it required to have a rinse blank for every test? The amount being 

brought back will be substantial. The rinse bottles will be the same for 

the entire project, and the reagents will be coming from the same lots. 

Thanks for your time in reading this. I apologize in advance if the 

answers to these should be obvious. 

Field Engineer 6 

GE Energy 

Performance Services 

T +1 630-530-6654 

C +1 262-960-3379 

F +1 630-530-6630 

E gregory.rock@ge.com 

888 Industrial Drive 

Elmhurst, Illinois, 60126, USA 

This communication is intended only for the individual or entity to whom 

it is directed. It may contain information that is privileged, 

confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. 

Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication by anyone 

other than the intended recipient, or a duly designated employee or 

From: "Rock, Gregory J (GE Infra, Energy)" <gregory.rock@ge.com>

To: Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 08/26/2009 11:22 AM

Subject: OTM-28

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C7653F5Do... 8/26/2010
agent of such recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this 

communication in error, please notify GE Energy immediately by telephone 

at (630) 530-6600 or via e-mail, and delete this message and all 

attachments thereto. Thank you. 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C7653F5Do... 8/26/2010
Case No. 9,616.

#### MILLS v. WILSON

[2 Cranch, C. C. 216.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1820.

Attachment — Affidavit—Note Indobsed — Production of Note.

Upon an attachment, issued by a justice of the peace, under the Virginia act of 26th De-. cember, 1792 (section 6), if the plaintiff’s claim arise, in part, upon a note of the defendant, taken up by the plaintiff, who was the indorser, the plaintiff’s own affidavit is not sufficient evidence of the debt, without producing the note.

This was an attachment issued by a justice •of the peace, under the act of Virginia of the 26th of December, 1792 (section 6). The plaintiff [W. N. Mills] offered his own oath as to the debt, stating that it arose, in part, upon the defendant’s note, which had been indorsed by the plaintiff, and by him taken up; but did not produce the note. His affidavit stated that the defendant [William Wilson] was indebted to him in, at least, the sum of $1,000.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Craneh, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(nem. con.) required the plaintiff to produce further evidence of his claim, .not being satisfied with the affidavit
No. 52815.

#### Max Seidman et al. *v.*United States,

protests 143124-K, etc. (New York).

*225Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
Before the Third Division,

January 8, 1952

No. 56250.

protest 174088-K (New York).

#### R. Dixon & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of cheese similar in all material respects to the Romano, Sardo, and Sbrinz cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706); that the items marked “B” consist of cheese the same as the Reggiano cheese involved in *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra•*that the items marked “C” consists of cheese the same as the Pepato cheese passed upon in Abstract 42146; and that the cheese described as “Sardo Cheese,” assessed at 35 percent under paragraph 710, consists of Romano cheese which was entered for consumption subsequent to the effective date of the trade agreement with Argentina, *supra.*In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the *365■cited decisions the court held as follows: (1) The items of merchandise marked with the letters “A” and “C” are subject to an allowance for tare of inedible ■coverings of *2%*percent from the net weight reported by the United States weigher; the items marked with the letter “B” are subject to an allowance for "tare of inedible coverings of 1 percent from the net weight reported by the United States weigher; and the items invoiced as Sardo cheese consist of Romano cheese •and, as such, are dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 710, as modified, *supra,*less such allowance for tare as is applicable to the items marked “A” on the invoice.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.

 

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation       General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and         principal financial officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.Date: November 12, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 42

   Regarding the use of United States Armed Forces as part of a NATO 
     peacekeeping operation implementing a Kosovo peace agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1999

  Mr. Gilman submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Regarding the use of United States Armed Forces as part of a NATO 
     peacekeeping operation implementing a Kosovo peace agreement.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Peacekeeping Operations in 
Kosovo Resolution''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The conflict in Kosovo has caused great human suffering 
        and, if permitted to continue, could threaten the peace of 
        Europe.
            (2) The Government of Serbia and representatives of the 
        people of Kosovo may agree in Rambouillet, France, to end the 
        conflict in Kosovo.
            (3) President Clinton has promised to deploy approximately 
        4,000 United States Armed Forces personnel to Kosovo as part of 
        a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) peacekeeping 
        operation implementing a Kosovo peace agreement.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR DEPLOYMENT OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES TO 
              KOSOVO.

    The President is authorized to deploy United States Armed Forces 
personnel to Kosovo as part of a NATO peacekeeping operation 
implementing a Kosovo peace agreement.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1



                          
                   EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND
                                 COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Year to Date as of           Fiscal Years Ended
                                 ------------------------------------------------------
                                    October 31,   November 1,   January 31,  February 1,
                                      1998          1997          1998          1997
                                   (39 Weeks)    (39 Weeks)    (52 Weeks)    (52 Weeks)
                                 ------------------------------------------------------
<S>                              <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>         
BASIC:
Net earnings                     $     15,015  $     14,979  $     49,382  $     45,669
                                 ============  ============  ============  ============
Weighted average number of
  outstanding common shares            26,010        29,283        28,398        32,090
                                 ============  ============  ============  ============


Net earnings per common
  share - basic (1)              $       0.58  $       0.51  $       1.74  $       1.42
                                 ============  ============  ============  ============

DILUTED:
Net earnings                     $     15,015  $     14,979  $     49,382  $     45,669
                                 ============  ============  ============  ============


Weighted average number of
  outstanding common shares            26,010        29,283        28,398        32,090

Number of common shares
  issuable assuming exercise
  of stock options                        483           630           377           473
                                 ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------                                          

Weighted average number of
  outstanding common and
  common equivalent shares -
  assuming full dilution               26,493        29,913        28,775        32,563
                                 ============  ============  ============  ============

Net earnings per common
  share - diluted (1)            $       0.57  $       0.50  $       1.72  $       1.40
                                 ============  ============  ============  ============
</TABLE>


(1)   Earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted
      average number of outstanding common and common equivalent shares.




                                       23
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20127 Summary Calendar

__________________ HENRY LEWIS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus TIMOTHY CARTER; A.L. LOSACK, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-94-3952
- - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Henry Lewis, Jr., argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint as frivolous because the notice he received advising him that he was to appear at a disciplinary hearing contained an ambiguous charge. Lewis also argues that he was erroneously found guilty of the disciplinary charge. Lewis further argues that he was not tried before an impartial disciplinary tribunal.No. 96-20127 -2- We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district court, and the brief, and find that the dismissal of the complaint as frivolous was not reversible error. See Stewart v. Thigpen , 730 F.2d 1002, 1005 (5th Cir. 1984). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005

AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company


Via UPS

February 23, 2006


Diana Kenneally
U.S. Bank National Association
1 Federal Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110

RE:	SARM 2005-16XS
	Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Kenneally:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending
on December 31, 2005:

1.	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master
Servicer during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the
Trust Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the
Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities
or obligations under the Agreements;

2.	Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
the Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the terms
of the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if there is a default
in the fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default or
failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

3.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead
this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement during
the preceding calendar year;

4.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement in any
material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment of its
obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature and
status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

5.	The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual audit
report, in each case to the extent required under the applicable Servicing
Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been received by
the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best reasonable efforts
to obtain such certificate or report.


Certified By:


/s/ R. Peter Karr
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 18, 2009

s0311 

# Order

March 18, 2009

136239 & (26)(27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136239 COA: 279507 Wayne CC: 97-006731 MARCEL RIDDLE-BEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r remand is DENIED. The motion to add grounds for appeal is GRANTED. The appli cation for leave to appeal the April 4, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








To the
Board of Directors


Highbury
Financial, Inc.








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 4, 2009
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, on the consolidated financial statements of Highbury Financial,
Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then
ended, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3
(No. 333-127272).








/s/
J.H.Cohn LLP








J.H.
Cohn LLP


New York,
New York


March 4,
2009
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William M. Lutz, hereby certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Quarterly Report of Salton, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Salton, Inc.         By:                                                       /s/ William M. Lutz    William M. Lutz    Chief Financial Officer   May 15, 2007This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.(the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference intoany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Salton,Inc. and will be retained by Salton, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.