alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Seaspan Corporation (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I Sai W. Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 31, 2009



|    |  |                                                                      |  | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Sai W. Chu                                                      
|    |  | Sai W. Chu                                                          
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed August 23, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00818
- CV
DAVID WORK , Appellant

V. PAMELA WORK , Appellee On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 19
- 04741 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Molberg Appellant appeals from the trial court’s order granting a motion for partial summary judgment. The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as there does not appear to be a final judgment. At the Court’s request, the parties filed letter briefs addressing the jurisdictional
issue. Generally, appellate courts have jurisd iction only over appeals from final judgments. See
Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that disposes of all parties and claims. See id

. In appellee’s original petition for post

- divorce division of property, she sought division of $67,295.64 and attorney’s fees. Appellant filed a counter

- petition requesting his attorney’s fees as sanctions. Appellee filed a motion for partial summary judgment requesting that the trial– 2

–

court find that the $67,295.64 is an undivided community asset. The trial court granted the
motion. T he order does not state how the $67,295.64 will be divided and does not dispose of the parties’ claims for attorney’s fees. N othing in appellant’s letter brief establishes this Court’s jurisdiction

. Because the division of the monetary asset and claims for attorney’s fees remain pending, the order is not final. Accordingly , we dis miss this appeal for want of jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

190818F.P05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLB ERG JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID WORK, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 00818

- CV V. PAMELA WORK, Appellee On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 19

- 04741. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Myers and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee PAMELA WORK recover her costs of this appeal from appellant DAVID WORK.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of August, 2019.
Exhibit 10.1.2

Schedule  of Stock  Option  Agreements  in the Form of Exhibit  10.1,  Including
Material Detail in Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.1

     1.   Stock  Option  Agreement,  dated  as of June  13,  2003,  between  the
          Registrant  and  Frederick A.  Huttner for options to purchase  50,000
          shares of Registrant's common stock

     2.   Stock  Option  Agreement,  dated  as of June  13,  2003,  between  the
          Registrant  and Robert H.  Donehew  for  options to  purchase  100,000
          shares of Registrant's common stock

     3.   Stock  Option  Agreement,  dated  as of June  13,  2003,  between  the
          Registrant and Anthony  Charos for options to purchase  100,000 shares
          of Registrant's common stock

     4.   Stock  Option  Agreement,  dated  as of  June  13,  2003  between  the
          Registrant and John F. McCarthy for options to purchase 100,000 shares
          of Registrant's common stock

The form of the documents  listed above does not differ in material  detail from
the form of Exhibit 10.1 except with respect to the identity of the director and
the number of options granted to such director.
EXHIBIT 99


JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP. ANNOUNCES SPECIAL DIVIDEND

Mifflintown, PA - The Board of Directors of the Juniata Valley Financial Corp.
(OTC-BB: JUVF.OB), recently declared a $1.00 per share Special Cash Dividend
which cannot be used for the Dividend Reinvestment Program. This dividend is
above the normal dividend declared by the Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and is
payable on February 27, 2004, to shareholders of record as of February 1, 2004.

The Juniata Valley Bank was chartered in 1867 and has 12 offices serving
Juniata, Mifflin, Perry and Huntingdon counties. More information regarding The
Juniata Valley Bank can be found online at www.jvbonline.com.
                                           -----------------
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 133

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>    BD
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
HOENIG  GROUP INC.  SEPTEMBER  30, 1996 FORM 10Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      16,674,678
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,530,875
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         19,276,175
<PP&E>                                       2,061,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,383,662
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     206,000
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,149
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,741,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,383,662
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         1,098,107
<COMMISSIONS>                               45,572,004
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                4,084,931
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                              12,273,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,407,466
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,019,802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS23-16]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

      ( print page 71551)    

# ACTION:

Notice of special closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on these dates.

*Location:*                         Virtual meeting via Webex.                    

*Date:*                         August 31, 2023 and September 7, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. ET.                    

*Location:*                         Virtual meeting via Webex.                    

*Date:*                         September 22, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         2:01 p.m. ET.                    

## Action and Discussion Item

### Personnel Matter

The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss a personnel matter. No action was taken by the ASC.

James R. Park,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-22890 Filed 10-16-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
# L_2023010EN.01011201.xml

| 12.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/112 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/112

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2580 of 17 June 2022 supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information to be provided in the application for the authorisation as a credit institution, and specifying the obstacles which may prevent the effective exercise of supervisory functions of competent authorities

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 335 of 29 December 2022
  )

On page 66, in recital 14:

for:

‘This Regulation should apply from XX.XX.XXXX in order to grant the competent authorities and applicant credit institutions sufficient time to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.’,

read:

‘This Regulation should apply from 18 July 2023 in order to grant the competent authorities and applicant credit institutions sufficient time to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.’.

On page 75, in Article 13:

for:

‘This Regulation shall apply from XX.XX.XXXX.’,

read:

‘This Regulation shall apply from 18 July 2023.’.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

I, Monty Moore, Chairman of Nevada Star Resource Corp. certify that:

 
| 1. | This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nevada Star Resource Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Star Resource Corp. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  July 10, 2006

 
|   | /s/ Monty Moore |    |
|--------|-----------------|--------------|

Monty Moore, Chairman
No. 65334.

#### Chain Bike Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/34506, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: May 19, 2016 518815

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YGORD BELIARD, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: April 26, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr., Devine and Mulvey, JJ.

__________ Eric K. Schillinger, East Greenbush, for appellant. Joel E. Abelove, District Attorney, Troy (Vincent J. O'Neill of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Devine, J. Appeal from an order of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Ceresia, J.), entered February 20, 2014, which classified defendant as a risk level II sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of rape in the second degree, attempted sodomy in the second degree and endangering the welfare of a child. In anticipation of his release from prison, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders prepared a risk assessment instrument presumptively classifying defendant as a risk level II sex offender (105 points) and recommended against a departure. Following hearings, County Court adopted the Board's risk level scoring and classified him as a risk level II sex offender. Defendant now appeals.-2- 518815

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that County Court should have ordered a hearing as to defendant's competence to participate in the risk assessment hearing pursuant to CPL 730.30. Assuming without deciding that a court's duty to order a competency hearing is applicable to risk level determinations pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (but see CPL 730.30 [1]), we find no abuse of discretion in County Court's failure to order such a hearing here. No hearing was requested and, although defendant was uncooperative, argumentative and evasive in his responses to County Court's questions during the hearings, he denied ever being treated for any mental illness or condition and his behavior did not raise a reasonable belief that he was unable to understand the proceedings or assist in the determination of his risk assessment level as to require a competency hearing (see People v Yu-Jen Chang, 92 AD3d 1132, 1134-1135 [2012]; People v Hood, 35 AD3d 1138, 1138 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 808 [2007]; see also United States v Neal, 776 F3d 645, 658-659 [9th Cir 2015]). Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr. and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Marine Growth  Ventures,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  each
of the  undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Action of 2002, that to the best
of his knowledge:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: March 22, 2007                   By: /s/  Craig Hodgkins
                                            ---------------------
                                            Craig Hodgkins
                                            President and Director
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 210 (Wednesday, November 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75004-75005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 75005]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; R25 Review.
    Date: November 6, 2023.
    Time: 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: William C. Benzing, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS, NIH, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3204, MSC 
9529 Rockville, MD 20852, 301-496-0660, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#167473786c7f787161567b777f7a38787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7a5a2a9bdaea9a0b087aaa6aeabe9a9aeafe9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: October 26, 2023.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-24117 Filed 10-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the Second Division,

June 4, 1964

No. 68604.

protests 61/9982-S and 61/9286-S (New York).

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. *Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Y OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. OF TEXAS ” 

AUSTIN / 

Hon. v. c. *s~r~bail, ab 

Texea SO11 aanrervation 

2. a. Box 191 

Temple, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

upon re-5xaRin5tfo 

addressed to you under d 

to the request oontaiasd 

we find that the languag 

. page 4 thereaf is too b 

grfipIls 60 that a4 

.to wead woh pareruwlaretobe 

ture nde a0 epeaifia 

in this pmtlaular bill .a0 oridsnae th5t the LegistatU~ 

faten&ed the term *aonttatgent ~xp5aseu* in any otbsr then 

Its Qrdiaery and uaucll s~nft%iwmOo~. 
a97 

Hon. V. Q. lkrsball, Page 8. 

ror apeoirla purposee~ em exhwmted, the State Soil Conservetion Board Is rithoutp6wer or authority to apead aoatlngent 

funds to supplement bad .lteas, tho oontingent moneyr, going 

not,to l upplaaent manaerated ltuas or purposes for rhiah 

speoiflo prorlsloa har bean aado by the Laglrlature, but to 

take oars or itom of oxpemm.for whlah pro~ialon baa not 

been nmde by the Leglslature.a _ 

uith the wbstitabioa of the above far the two 

'mragraphr mentioned, the orlglnnl opiaion rtandr ar'wrlttan. 

BY 

R. Iv. relrehild 

Assl8tent
VENDOR NAME: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) 

SmartBUY Blanket Purchase Agreement (SmartBUY) Summary 

A Federal government wide ordering agreement with ESRI has been established for software, training, and 

maintenance on behalf of GSA SmartBUY. This contract reduces contracting and open market costs such as: 

search for sources, the development of technical documents, solicitations, and the evaluation of bids and 

offers. This BPA will further decrease costs, reduce paperwork, and save time by eliminating the need for 

repetitive, individual purchases from the schedule contract. The objective is to create a purchasing mechanism 

for the Government that works better and costs less. 

This BPA has been designated as a GSA/FAS/SmartBUY PMO Agreement, which is open to all U.S. 

Executive Agencies (as defined in 48 CFR 21), including the DoD, except as restricted herein. 

Vendor Information 

Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) develops geographic information systems (GIS) 

solutions for a variety of organizations. 

GSA Contract #: GS-35F-5086H, Federal Supply Schedule 2003-4204 

GSA Schedule 70

GSA Schedule #: GS-35F-05086H

DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 

Federal Tax ID#: 95-2775-732 

Product name: ArcGIS collection of GIS software products 

Brief description of product line(s) 

ArcGIS is an integrated family of GIS software products, which operate on desktop, server and mobile 

platforms. It provides a standards-based platform for spatial analysis, planning, data management and 

production and mapping. ArcGIS can be integrated with a variety of business intelligence tools an enterprise 

may already have. Additionally, it provides developers with tools to build and design own applications. 

The existing SmartBUY continues to offer the ESRI product line and is also available on the GSA SmartBUY 

website. Information on pricing and terms and conditions is available on the GSA SmartBUY website. 

Vendor Contact Information 

Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) 

380 New York Street 

Redlands, CA 92373-8100 

http://www.esri.com/ 

Jody Ferrao 

Phone: (909)793-2853, ext 2286 

Email: jferrao@esri.com 

Government Points of Contact 

U.S. General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service 
SmartBUY Program Management Office 

10304 Eaton Place 

Fairfax, VA 22030-2213 

Michael W. Hargrove 

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) 

Suite 3A-05 

Phone: (703) 306-7701 

Fax: (703) 306-6816 

Email: michael.hargrove@gsa.gov 

Stephen F. Bell 

Project Manager (PM) 

Suite 3A-15 

Phone: (703) 306-7595 

Fax: (703) 306-6816 

Email: stephen.bell@gsa.gov