alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 9. 1939

Hon. **Forrestar** Hancook DistrlatAttorney Wuahaahla, Texas Dear b. **Haaaook:** opinion NO. o-42 Re: Poll Tax Your telegramor Janwry 6, 1039 aa rollora,re+
'WAXAHACHIE

TRX JAN $ 1939 GERALD C. MANN ATTORNEYGRNERALOFTEXAS AUSTMTFXWHAT POLLTAX IS ??ECESSARYTG VGTE GA INDEPERDXHI SCROOL DISTRICTBOND I;;Sti TO BE HELD JANUARY 7 1939 ASSUMIH: ONE RAS PAID HIS 1933 POLL TAX'BUT FAILED TO PAY HIS 1937 POLL TAX IS SUCH A PERSON ELIGIBLE TO VGTE IN TIlE AFGRXSAIDELECTION?KCRX OPINION IF PossIBLEpa da or totlay:

In ruply thereto,the followingwire was sent to
"AUSTIN Tax JANUARY 7 1959 EONFORRESTERRANCOCK DISTRICTATTORNEYWAXAHACHIETEX QUALIFIEDVOTERS ELECTIONTODAY OUR OPINIOH PERSON WITH 1930 FOLL TAX RECEIPT ONLY NOT QUALIFIZDVOTER PXRSON '::'ITR 1937 ?OLL TAX RECEIFT IS QUALIFIED SEE ARTICLE 2955 REXISED STA'l'UTXS

AND NEIL VERSUS PILE 75 SOlJTRbXSTZRIi SECOND 899 -

ATTORNEYGENERAL c;F TEXAS ,' BY GXO S BEXRY ALSISTANT" IHon. ForresterEakoook, January 9, 1939

::. In conrinaation or your wire hereinabovequoted, thie ie to adivse yhat by an opinion of HonorableEarl Street,Assistant AttorneyGeneral, on December 20, 1935, in hi.8 letter opinion addressedto Hon. Don Parker, County Auditor,Eaatland,Texae, the followingwas his holding: "Article 2935, R.C.S. and court opinion or Neil v. Pile, 75 S. W. (Zd) 899, to **errect** that if a person offers to vote during tha month of January 1936, he **need not**  have paid the poll tax which ia now due, but whioh he has until January 31, 1936 to pay. If he paid his poll tax prior to Jammy 31, 1935, .that 18, if he holds what is cmtaonlykuowu ae a "1935 Poll Tax Reoeipt*he is eligible to vote during the month of January 1936. If he does not hold suah receipt than he is not eligible to vote during said month even though he may have paid the poll tax which ,is now due and payable, that is, what is commonlykuowu as the *1936 Poll Tax Reoeipt." Your attention ie espeolallpaalled to that part of Artiole 2955 Revised Civil Statutesof Texas of 1925, which in part reada as followa: I)... holds a reoeipt showing that said poll tax was paid before the first day of Februarynext preceding such eleotion;.
. .* We believe that the opinionheretoforegiven by Rr. Street, and stated above, is the law and the rule ia therain aorreatlg atated. Believelngthat we have made the situatiouolear to you, we are Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERRL **OF** TEXAS

BY (sign&d)Gee. S. Berry

Assistant GSB:RS APPRGVED: (signed) Gerald C. Eann ATTORREY'~GERERAL

GF TEXAS
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Aloha Mr. Scott Faulk 

Marryan Sproat < marryan_sproat@yahoo.com > 

Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:53 PM 

EAS (OST); Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Kalaupapa Submittion 

kala123.pdf 

My names is Marlene Sproat, co-owner alongside my husband Buzzy Sproat and 

partners with Roy and Faith Horner of Moloka'i Mule Ride (dba Kalaupapa Adventures 

and Essence of Aloha, dba Espresso Cafe at Coffees of Hawaii located in Kualapu'u 

Town. As business owners and residents of Moloka'i, we have found that Mokulele 

Airlines have been dedicated in servicing our island community with affordable fares, 

friendly service and positive public relations. 

Moloka'i Mule Ride has been a part of Kalaupapa alongside Damien Tours for 40 

years. Throughout these years we have seen different airline carriers come and go. 

We are aware of the situations that our community faces daily, not to mention the 

State Workers, National Park Service and the tourist that comes to visit this beautiful 

and prestine place. 

With Mokulele's vast booking ability, the experienced leadership and the valuable 

support they render to our islands, medical, educational and community needs is what 

makes up an exceptional airline. 

Therefore, I humbly ask that you would consider awarding Mokulele the 4 year EAS 

contract. 

Sincerely, 

Marlene Sproat 

1
No. 58813.

protest 226757-K (Boston).

#### International Packers Commercial Division of International Packers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, it appeared that the protest was untimely. The protest was, therefore, dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8195** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
WILLIE DAVID BROWN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 3:93

- cr - 00264

- MR

- 1 )

Submitted : October 2 9 , 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam o pinion

.
Willie David Brown, Appellant Pro Se. David Alan Brown, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Willie David Brown a ppeals t he district court ’ s order denying a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown , N o. 3:93

- cr 00264

- MR

- 1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EPA Reg. No. 69526-4 

Vol. 1 – part 2
Order filed, July 18, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00596

- CR

____________ WILLIE BROOKS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Crim Dist Ct 4 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 1215599D



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 10, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order
, the O fficial Court Reporter of Criminal District Court Number 4
, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73866-73867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23691]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2023-0292]


National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee 
Meeting; November 2023 Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The meeting of the National Chemical Transportation Safety 
Advisory Committee scheduled for November 28 through 30, 2023, from 9 
a.m. until 5 p.m. Central Standard Time (CST) is cancelled.

DATES: The cancelled meeting was announced in the Federal Register on 
Tuesday, October 10, 2023, at 88 FR 69936.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Ethan T. Beard, Alternate 
Designated Federal Officer of the National Chemical Transportation 
Safety Advisory Committee, telephone, (202) 372-1419, or email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7e2d3cfc6c989f389e5c2c6d5c3e7d2d4c4c089cacecb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90d5e4f8f1febec4bed2f5f1e2f4d0e5e3f3f7befdf9fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The Committee acts solely in an advisory 
capacity to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security 
through the Commandant of the Coast Guard and the Director of 
Commercial Regulations and Standards on matters related to the safe and 
secure marine transportation of hazardous materials.

[[Page 73867]]

    Notice of cancellation of this meeting is given under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., ch. 10).

    Dated: October 23, 2023.
Benjamin J. Hawkins,
Acting Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2023-23691 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 130

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Toro Ventures Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), eachof the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

| September 26, 2008 | By: /s/ "Frederick Graham"                                                    |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Frederick Graham, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief      Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2375
ALOK KUMAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT E. CAHILL, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 2435-L) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 1997 Before HALL and MI CHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alok Kumar appeals the district court's order denying reliefon his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kumar v. Cahill , No. CA-96-2435-L (D. Md. Aug. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 61157.

protest 310386-K (B) (New York).

#### Camera Specialty Co., Inc., and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the repairs to the lenses involved are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Camera Specialty Co., Inc.,*and *Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(34 Cust. Ct. 27, C. D. 1672), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
NO T R EC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 09a0260n.06 F iled: April 3, 2009 No. 07-6339 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
RI CH AR

DSO N M . R OBER TS, P laintif f-App ellant,
v. FINAN C I A L T E C H N O L OGY VENTURES, L.P., e t al

. , De fend ant s- App e lle e s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) O N A P P E A L F R O M T H E U N I T ED STA TES DI STRIC T C OU RT F OR THE M ID DL E D ISTRIC T OF TEN NE SSEE

Be for e : B OG G S, C hie f Judg e ; G IBBO NS a nd G RI F F IN , C ir c uitJudg e s. JULIA SMITH GIBBONS , Ci rcuit Judge. Pla int if f- a pp e lla nt R ic ha rd so n M . Ro be rt s appea ls the decision of the district c ourt g rantingsummary judgme nt for def

endants-a ppellees F ina nc ia l T e c h n o l o g y V e n tu r e s , L
. P
. , an d i t s a f f i l i a t e d e n t i t i e s ( “ F T V ” )
. R o b e rt s s u e d F T V t o
rec over a $10 milli on pay

ment for ag ree ing to sell Verus F inancial Ma nag ement, Inc., a c redit-c ard pa y me nt p ro c e ssi ngc omp any , to the de fe nd ants . A ft e r c are fu lly re vie wi ngthe re c or d, the a pp lic a ble law, the pa

rties’ brie fs, and having ha d the bene fit of ora l argument, we f ind that the district court’s op ini on c or re c tly se ts o ut t he fa c ts a nd the g ove rn inglaw. B e c a us e thi s c ourt ’s iss ua

nc e of a fu ll opinion would serve no jurisprude ntial purpose and w ould be duplicative, we aff irm on the basis of the district court’s w ell-re asoned or der of October 23, 2007, g ranting summary judgme nt to FTV a nd finding the ag ree ment in question invalid and unenfor cea ble.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129168) pertaining to the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan of NCI, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of NCI, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of NCI, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

|             
|-------------
|             
|McLean, VA   
|March 5, 2010
Before the Second Division,

July 7, 1949

No. 53356.

protests 103147-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fine Arts Bag Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of. counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 SECTION
        1350 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO\
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the annual report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"),
 I,
        Michael G. Wirtz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 Date:
        October 29, 2007
 
 
 /s/
                  Michael G. WirtzChief
                  Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.3

Change of Control Agreement between Premier Bancorp, Inc., Premier Bank and John
J. Ginley (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 13, 1998).

                                       35

<PAGE>
| (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Jammin Java  Corp. for the year ended January 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Jammin Java Corp. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Shane Whittle                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Shane Whittle                                                                                                                                         |
| President, Secretary and Treasurer Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|                                                                                                                                                  |   |

----
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN , JJ, 

no?zorabla P. a, bd.rath 

COMty AtiUitor 

Cooke cowkty 

caineov1lle, Texea 
.of th6 stetc or Tsntl:*, inalu5in& att010A3 

627 to t&l, lnclwivd, of cauq#Aw 2, Title 

18, i&aVlsed Statutes or xgll, QS aaraadad 

br Scratlou. 1 chapter 203, hota or 193. 

E@uler L;eOOlatr, and ursuaut to an 0 & 

P 

32 

psaed by ti cx-aairra oneM, Court of Cooke 

oounty Texftn, on the 13th day or 3q+abar#. 

A. C. i920, d.ll.oh order is of reoord Is 

nook 9, pages 33s to 3&b inoluuive, of 

the Mm&a Of Se$.O OQUi C.! 
tbsre8f. rata or interest b8rna by the bonda 

and pie0t1 or -3=nt of prin4iipi31 aa4 ir;torcret, 

OEQ rlxing rorm or bond nc4 cou on, en4 pro- 

~i~iae r0r the hvy 0r ~n 66 VII E 0fa3 -X up022 

thei tozable property in auS3 road dletrlot nufri0i6nt to pay th3 i.amfat 0% SUO~ b0m and 

u) pro&we e *W&ii fund for the rabony2tiw 

5r the rinoipal thur0or at itimrityr are hereby le@ E 6et?, approved and vol.lQeted.” 

m vbew or thy; vd.id0ti511 or *&5 bonds 3x1 the r0m 

in rhlah they were lecpued, aM lu aoeordrinoa with the order& 

under whloh they were lswsd the bonds may not be railecamsd 

bBr0ra saturity. i?osd ’31str i at Ho. 2, Colorado county v. 

chw$Oly (Telx. cit. Jtpg.) I.20 53. 15. (al) $59. Th6 QBBO olted 

ia t!!etararfiretlve OS tha point there, the bowla were issued 

with the provlulan thttt oarta la bon68 should be optional on 

63 002-t~in bate, 0uhf3~ th0 '0mt.r or d430tion ryld p0~idsd 

that the bfsnds ahonld be optional OA any intweet pying i%&+t~ 

TheI Bouaty BnnlsndQd in that MM that ingrovlslon in the bon& thst tha auae ahwld be . 

0 

6 E 

t&Ml eJ.lu an a dat6 amtaln l?ucs 4t varluau8 with the prueothi procte~u8 the pmvioicm wad invalid and i5opemtlva 

bo t&a sxEent’~to w&l&Wit aonrllataa with the pmelso~ion proCIbC?dwCi. The oeurt pakited out that thiv bon&a wra lruruelz 

prior to th6 d~i~ion or.3x8uni~ 0. aoogac 5iipm3, find the 

the lrunaanoa or th61 bonda hat been vsU4atab b,.: ~the flxct CallMl asalon or the 39th A.e&$uluturPr. It wao, ther8ror%, bald 

t&it the b&nAs were aot optianaX, eava and exocp& um th@ one 

data fl~~$dr~r tbu~-~dumption bof~~~~~~~ty. 

330 01s~ of Ooohl"M County v+ Una la &ot appUoab2o 

Eo the baads Bclra under eoneid~mtion. -3mt daoislon mlatee 

only tcr 8ounty bosda uraued undw chapter 2 or,Tltle 22, Bemea Clvll citntute#a, 1925, an& to bonda ieBu6c under the 

statutory provitians whloh were th% onceeCorll of ianptar 21 

namuly, Chat 2 of l’itlct i8 of the iZaviaad Civil Stotutea 
.-. . 

or19ll. Cur o&Lon ho. CXiI+93.oototruea the sppUosbillty 

3f th6 Cochrm COtUIfy 0~386) t0 COUnt$ baqdse h. oopy of It la 

anolosd hesmith ;‘x yclur informAlon.
Before ti-ie Second Division,

June 15, 1967

No. P67/198.

#### Arnhold Ceramics, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/23636, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of high pressure presses and parts which are dedicated for use therewith similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnhold*Ceramics, *Inc.*v. *899
      *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 416, C.D. 2668), the protests were dismissed and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the separate value of the high pressure presses and motors in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)).
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Erik Delgado Garcia v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00985

- CR

Trial court case number: 1253927

Trial court: 184th District Court of Harris Coun ty

In his brief, appellant complains that the district clerk failed to include a bill of costs in the

clerk’s record. A supplemental clerk’s record has been filed containing a bill of costs.

In light of the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record co ntaining a bill of costs, appellant may

file a supplement al brief to address his complaints, if any , with respect to the trial court’s

assessment of court costs . Appellant’s supplemental brief, if any, is due to be filed with the

Clerk of this Court by Ja nuary 11, 2013. Any response brief filed by the State must be filed by

January 25, 2013.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 17, 2012
```

[Federal Register: June 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 104)]
[Notices]               
[Page 30459-30460]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jn10-126]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7032]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Dynasty and Divinity: Ife Art in Ancient Nigeria''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et

[[Page 30460]]

seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation 
of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of 
Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine 
that the objects to be included in the exhibition ``Dynasty and 
Divinity: Ife Art in Ancient Nigeria,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX, 
from on or about September 19, 2010, until on or about January 9, 2011; 
at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Richmond, VA, from on or about 
February 19, 2011, until on or about May 22, 2011; at the Indianapolis 
Museum of Art, Indianapolis, IN, from on or about July 10, 2011, until 
on or about October 9, 2011; at the Museum for African Art, New York, 
NY, from on or about November 11, 2011, until on or about March 4, 
2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-13066 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```