08/09/201 1 15:i g 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 02/0 7

1 1 3

5 6 7 8

1 0 i l 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 3. 6 1 7 I B 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 € 2 7 2 B 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 £ 3 7 3 3 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 KYL E E
. LOMAZO W FAA OFFIC E O FREGIONA L COUNSE L 160 1 LIN D AVE. , S W RE>rro>/ , WASHINGTO N9S0 5 7 TELEPHONE : 425-227-184 7 FACSIMILE: 425-227-100 7 

## m\ ^ \^ ^ \^ > \ ^ 

## v^\

.

UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D. C I n th e Matte r

of : FEDERA L EXPRES S CORPORATIO N

I n th e Matte r

of : EMPIRE AIRLINES , INC

. FA A Docke t No

. CP l 0NM0fiIl 6 FA A cas e No

. 2009NM70O55 6 ' DMSNo.FAA-2010-079 0

FA A Docke t

No

. CP10NMq007_

_ F A \cas e No

. 2OO9NM7OO055 ^ DMSNo

. FAA-20IO-079 I Judge : RichardC

. Goodwi n

MOTIO N I N LIMIN E AND REQUES T FO REXPEDITE D RULIN G JUDG E G0OD>^TN : Complainant , througl i he

r undersigne dcounsel , hereb y move s pursuan t to 1 4 C.F.R

. § 13.218 , fo r aMotio n I

n Limin e concernin g Respondent' s Notice dWitnesse s fo r the followin g reasons : 1

. O n Axigust

8,2011 , Responden t

notifie dComplainan t

tha t i t hadfive witnesse s tha

t h e intende dt o call

. Fro mth e summary ' o f tliei r expecte dtestimony , i t

appear s tha

t tw o o f thes e \\1messe s are bein g offere dfor reason s that

ar e irrelevan t

an dimmateria l to thes e proceedings

. 2

. Responden t

ha s indicate dthat

Jay Johnston , Regulatory Complianc e Manager , wil l b e calle dt o testif

y concernin g th e rulemakin g an ddiscussion s surroundin g th e regulation s a t Issu e i n thi s case
. H e wil l testif

y a s to th e suppose deffect o n th e healthcar e industr> * an d UN337 3 shipper s i f

th e Federal Aviatio n Administration' s (FAA ) interpretatio n o f th e rul e require s carrier s t o perfor ma n inspectio n a

t acceptanc e o f

UN337 3 shipments

. H e wil l furthe r testif y a s t o th e Unite dKingdo m(UK ) recommendation s for UN337 3 shipment s an dho w th e allege dinterpretatio n wil l arguabl y affec t internationa l shipments

. Non e o f this i s relevant

t o th e fact s a

t issu e i n thi s case
. Discussion s surroundin g th e deliberativ e proces s leadin g X o th e adoptio n o f

th e rule s a

t issu e her e ar e completel y irrelevant

. Any hazardou s material rul e entail s many discussion s leadin g up t o it s adoption , bu t

non e o f tha t i s relevan t

a s th e final rul e i s th e rule

. Th e rul e itsel f andany
Agency' s Motio n i n Limin e DMSNo

. FAA-20IO-07pO*FAA-20IO-a79 I FA A Docket

No

. CP10NM000 6 & CP10NM000 7 FAA Cas e - 2009NM70005 6 an d2009NM70006 5 Pag e 1 o f

3 KI-LE E

- LOMAZOW , F.^ A ATTORNE Y TEL : A^^.ni

. IS47 ; FAX ; •125.227.100 708/09/201 1 15:1 9 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E
. 03/0 7

1 2 3 4 5 e 7 e 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1- 1 1 5 1 6 1 7 I B 1 3 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 24 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 9 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 B 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 44 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 publishe dcomment s fromth e publi c woul db e relevant , but backdoo r discussion s leadin g up t o afinalizedrul e ar e no t relevan t t o th e fact s surroundin g thi s case
. Furthermore , th e U K recommendation s fo

r UN337 3 shipment s i s als o completel y irrelevant

. Recommendation s o f

an y kin dar e jus t recommendations

. All liiat i s relevan t

here ar e th e actual publishe dhazardou s material s rule s tha t al l carrier s andsliipper s mus t adhere to

. 3

. Responden t

ha s indicate dtha t

To mFerguson , Technical Consultan t an dInstructor , i s bein g offered , bu t

doe s no t indicat e what

h e i s bein g offere dfor

a s ther e i s n o descriptio n o f what h e wil l actuall y testif

y to

. Instea dv^a t

i s bein g offere di s essentiall y hi s resume , bu t ther e i s nothin g indicatin g that h e ha s any knowledg e o f th e fact s o f

tlii s particular cas e or ho w hi s testimon y woul dbenefi t th e court

. THERBFpRE , tli e Complaint move s tha

t th e Administistiv e La

w Judg e (ALT) :

a
. Preclud e the testimony o f Ja y Jolinsto n an

dTomFerguson , a s their

testimon y i s totall y irrelevant

.

. b

. In th e alternative , limi t th e testimon y o f

Jay Johnsto n an dTo mFerguso n t o th e fact s

. surroundin g thi s cas e an dprohibi t themfromtestifyin g abou t th e deliberativ e proces s behin dth e hazardou s material s rule s a t issu e i n thi s cas e o r

any reconunendation s to change s regardin g th e regulations

.
c
. A s th e hearin g i

n thi s matter

i s se t fo r Augus t 25 , 2011 , require aRespons e firomth e Responden t

b y Augus t

16 , 2011 , s o th e AL

f ma y rul e o n this matte r

prio r t o th e hearing

. DATE D thi s 9"*

" da y o f Augus t 2011

. Respectfully submitted

.

^'^^ ^ Kyl e E

. Loraazo w FA A Attorne y

Agency' s Morio n i

n Limin e DM S No

. FAA-20](>O79 0 &

. FAA-2010-079 1 FAA Docke t

No

. CP10NM000 6 & CP l 0NMO0O 7 FAA Case

- 20O9N'M70005 6 an dZ009NM70006 5 Pag e 2 o f 3 fcV-LB E

. LOMAZOW , FA A ATTO^tNT V TEL : 425.227.1847 ; FAX : 425.227.100 708/09/201 1 15:1 9 •425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 04/0 7

3 4 5 € 7 B 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 l a 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 24 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 S 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4- 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 •5 1 5 2 5 3 CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoin g Agency' s Motio n i n Limin e ha s bee n serve dvi afacsimil e an dovernigh t

thi s date , t o th e following :

Th e Honorabl e RichardC

. Goodwi n Offic e o f bearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E

. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , R mE12-32 0 Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 FAX : 202-366-753 6 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , D. C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suite 2W100 0 FAX : 202-493-514 2 Cynthi aChandler-Snel l Staf f Attorney , Federal Express , Inc

. 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , S" " Floo r Memphis, TM 38125-S80 0 TEL : 901-434-S36 I ¥AX \901-434-828 3

Date dthis 9t

h da y of August , 2011

.

^^./ < ^-

- ^ 

## !:1^M£AU ^

ian aStephenso n Offic e o f Regional Counse l (ANM-7 ) Federa l Agnatio n Administratio n 160 J LindAve

. S W Renton , WA 9805 7 425-227-216 4

Agency' s Motio n i

n Limin e DM S No

. F.-VA-Z

O 10-079 0 & FA.V2010-079 1 FA A Docke t

No

. CP10NM000 6 & CF10NM000 7 FA A Case

- 2009NM70005 6 an d2009NM70006 5 Pag e 3 of 3 KYL E E ! LOMAZOW

. FAA ATTORNE Y TEI. : 425.227.1S47 ; FAX ; 425.227.100 708/09/201 1 15:1 9 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 05/0 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 6 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 € 4 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 KYL E E
. LOMAZO W FAA OFFIC E O FREGIONA L COUMSE L 160 1 LTND AVE. , SW RENTON , WASHfNGTO

N 9805 7 TELEPHONE: 425/227-1S4 7 ' FACSIMILE : 425/227-100 7 

### UNITED STATE S O FAMERIC A

DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C

. In th e Matter

o f FEDERA L EXPRES S CORPORATIO N

I n th e Matte r

of : CORPORAT E AIR FA A Docke t No

. CPlONMOOl l FA A cas e No

. 2008NM70012 7 DM S No

. FAA-2010-097 7

FA A Docke t

No

. CPIONMOOI

O FA.A

. cas e No

. 2008NM70012 6 DM S No

. FAA-2010-097 5 Judge : RichardC , Goodw n

MOTIO N I N LIMIN E AND REQUES T FO REXPEDITE D RULIN G JUDG E GOODWIN : Complainant , througli hi s undersigne dcounsel , hereb y move s pursuan t t o 14C.F.R

. § 13.218 , fo r aMotio n In Limin e concernin g Respondent' s Notice dWitnesse s fo r tli e followin g reasons : 1

. On Augus t

8 , 2011 , Responden t

notifie dComplainan t

tha t i t ha dfive witnesse s tha

t he intende dt o call

. Fro mth e summar y o f thei r expecte dtestimony , i t

appear s tha

t tw o o f thes e witnesse s ar

e bein g offere dfo

r reason s tha t

ar e irrelevan t

an dimmaterial to thes e proceedings

. 2

. Responden t

ha s indicate dtha

t Ja y Johnston , Regulatory Complianc e Manager , will b e calle dto testif

y concernin g th e rulemakin g an ddiscussion s surroundin g th e regulation s a t issu e i n thi s case
. H e wil l testif

y a s t o th e suppose deffect o n th e healthcar e industr y and UN337 3 shipper s i f

th e Federal Aviatio n Administration' s (FAA ) interpretatio n o f th e rul e require s carrier s to perfor ma n inspectio n a

t acceptanc e o f

UN337 3 shipments

. H e wil l furtlier

testif y a s t o th e Unite dKingdo m(UK ) recommendation s fo r UN337 3 shipment s andho w th e allege dinterpretatio n wil l arguabl y affec t internationa l sliipments

. Non e o f this i s relevan t

t o th e fact s a

t issu e i n thi s case
. Discussion s surroundin g th e deliberativ e proces s leadin g t o th e adoptio n o f th e rule s a

t issu e her e are completel y irrelevant

. Any hazardou s material rul e entail s many discussion s leadin g up t o it s adoption , bu t

non e o f tha t i s relevan t

a s th e final rul e i s the rule

. Th e rul e itsel f an dan y
Agency' s Motio n i

n Limin e DM S No

. FAA-20 ] 0-097 7 A FAA.2010^097 5 FA A Docket No

. CPION'MOO

I I & CPION^-fOOl

O FAA Cas e - 200SNM7012 6 an d2009NN'T70 [2 7 Pog e I o f 3 KYL E E

. LOMAJJOW

, FAA ATTORKE

Y TEL ; 42?-227-1847 ; FAX

- 425-227-100 7Q8/0g/201 l 15:1 9 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 06/0 7

1 2 3 ' d

• 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 I S 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 :3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 34 3 5 3 5 3 7 3 6 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 6 4 9 S O 5 1 5 2 5 3 publishe dcomment s firomth e publi c woul db e relevant , but backdoo r discussion s leadm g u p t o afinalizedrul e ar

e no t relevan t t o tli e fact s surroundin g this case
. Furthermore , th e U K recommendation s for

UN337 3 shipment s i s als o completel y irrelevant

. Recommendation s o f

any kin dar e jus t

recommendations

. Al l that i s relevan t

here are th e actual pubUshe dhazardou s material s rule s tliat al l carrier s an dshipper s mus t adliere to

. 3

. Responden t

ha s indicate dthat

To mFerguson , Technical Consultan t an dInstructor , i s bein g offered , but

doe s no t indicat e what

h e i s bein g oflfere

dfo r a s ther e i s n o descriptio n o f what h e wil l actuaJly testif

y to

. Instea dwhat

i s bein g offere di s essentiall y hi s resimie , bu t ther e i s nothin g indicatin g that h e ha s any knowledg e o f th e fact s o f

this particula

r cas e o r ho w hi s testimon y woul dbenefi t th e court

. THEREFORE , the Complaint move s tha

t th e Administrativ e Law Judg e (ALJ) :

aPreclud e the testimony o f Ja y Johnsto n an

dTomFerguson , a s their

testimon y i s totall y irrele\'ant

. b

. I n th e alternative , limi t

th e testimon y o f

Ja y Johnsto n an dTo mFerguso n t o th e fact s surroundin g thi s cas e andprohibi t the mfi-omtestifyin g about th e deliberativ e proces s behin dth e hazardou s material s rule s a t issu e i n thi s cas e o r

an y recommendation s t o change s regardin g th e regulations

.
c
. A s th e hearin g i n thi s matter i s set fo r Augus t 25

. 2011 , require aRespons e fromth e Respondent

b y Augus t

16 , 2011 , s o th e AL

J ma y rul e o n this matter

prio r t o th e hearing

. DATED thi s 9^

^ da y o f Augus t 2011

. Respectfully submitted

.

Kyl e E

. Lomazo w FA A Attorne y

Agency' s Motio n i n Limin e DM S No

. FAA-20IO-097 7 & F.AA-2 a10-097 5 FA A Docke t

No

. C P ] OKMOO1 1 & CP1ONMOO1 0 FA A Case-2OOSNM7012 6 an d20.09NM70I2 7 Pag e 2 o f 3 KYL E E

. LOMAZOW

. FAA ATTORNE

Y TEL : 425-227-IS47;F.'VX : 425-227-100 708/09/201 1 15:1 9 ^125227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 07/0 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 I S 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 24 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1

' J 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 5 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 B O 5 1 5 2 5 3 CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y that th e foregoin g Agency' s Motio n i n Limin e ha s bee n serve dvi afacsimil e an dovernigh t

thi s date , t o th e following :

Th e Honorabl e RichardC

. Goodwi n Offic e o f hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E

. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , RmEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 FAX : 202-366-753 6 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , D.C

. 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wri^ t Buildin g - Suit e 2Wil0O

O FAX : 202-493-514 2 Cynthi aChandler-Snel l Staf f Attorney , Federal Express , Inc

. 362 0 Hack s Cros s Road Buildin g B , 3'' ' Floo r Memphis , T

N 38125-880 0 TEL : 901-434-836 1 FAX : 901-434-828 3

Date dthi s 9t

h da y of August , 2011

. 

# [2Z^IZ22: ^

Dan aStephenso n Offic e o f Regional Counse l (ANM-7 ) Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 LindAve

. S W Renton , W

A 9805 7 425-227-216 4

Agency' s Motio n i

n Limin e DM S KD

. FA.A-2 0 10-O97 7 &

. F..\A-2010-097 5 FAA Doclfc l \o

. CPI0N\rOO l I A CPION'MOOI O FA A Case

- 2008NM7012 6 an d2009NM7012 7 Pag e 3 o f 3 KYL E E

. LONV^OW , FA A ATTORNE Y TEL ; 425-227-1847 ; F.AX ; 425-227-100 7