Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2023 / Notices 73887 

May 8, 2020, November 9, 2020, April 

19, 2022, and May 19, 2022, the licensee 

proposed the unrestricted release and 

removal from License 24–00513–32 of 

the South Farm site. The site is 

approximately 60 m by 23 m (200 ft by 

75 ft) and was operated as a chemical 

waste disposal facility between 1969 

and 1972. The chemical waste disposed 

of at the South Farm site also included 

a radiological component. 

Need for the Proposed Action 

Approval of the proposed action 

would permit additional remediation of 

the site (soil) for non-radiological 

constituents at a later time and allow 

the NRC to fulfill its responsibilities 

under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 

as amended (AEA), to ensure protection 

of the public health and safety and the 

environment by verifying that the site 

meets the requirements for unrestricted 

release in 10 CFR 20.1402, 

‘‘Radiological criteria for unrestricted 

use.’’ 

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed 

Action 

The NRC’s evaluation of the proposed 

action is that the South Farm site will 

have minimal impacts on the 

environment to include future land use, 

geology and soils, water resources, 

ecology, air quality, and noise and will 

comply with NRC’s unrestricted release 

criteria pursuant to 10 CFR part 20, 

‘‘Standards for Protection Against 

Radiation.’’ 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to the proposed 

action, the staff considered denial of the 

proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ 

alternative). An alternate approach is 

not to release the area for unrestricted 

use. The consequences could 

significantly limit the ability of the 

Curators of the University of Missouri to 

remediate the site for non-radiological 

constituents at a later time and allow 

the NRC to fulfill its responsibilities 

under the AEA to ensure protection of 

the public health and safety and the 

environment. 

Alternative Use of Resources 

The proposed action does not involve 

any different environmental resources 

beyond those considered in the final 

environmental statement. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

Between May 9, 2020, and May 19, 

2022, the NRC staff consulted with the 

State of Missouri’s Radiological Control 

Department regarding the 

environmental impact of the proposed 

action. The State of Missouri’s 

Radiological Control Department made 

comments which were addressed by 

NRC staff. On May 19, 2022, the State 

indicated that they did not have 

additional comments for consideration. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The NRC staff has concluded that the 

proposed licensing action, to release the 

South Farm disposal area as designated 

by the Curators of the University of 

Missouri for unrestricted use, would not 

significantly affect the quality of the 

human environment. The NRC staff 

considered the impacts on land use, 

transportation, geology and soils, water 

resources, ecology, air quality, noise, 

historical and cultural resources, visual 

and scenic resources, socioeconomic 

resources, public and occupational 

health, and waste management and 

concluded that radiological doses to 

members of the public would be below 

applicable limits in 10 CFR part 20. On 

the basis of the EA, the NRC finds that 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts from the action, and that 

preparation of an environmental impact 

statement is not warranted. 

Accordingly, the NRC has determined 

that a FONSI is appropriate. In 

accordance with 10 CFR 51.32(a)(4), this 

FONSI incorporates the EA set forth in 

this notice by reference. 

IV. Availability of Documents 

The documents identified in the 

following table are available to 

interested persons through one or more 

of the following methods, as indicated. 

Document description ADAMS accession No. 

Curators of the University of Missouri—Columbia—Decommissioning Amendment Request—Partial Site Release of South Farm, dated November 9, 2018.ML18318A032. 

Request for Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Safety Evaluation Report for Proposed Decommissioning Project at South Farm site, Curators of the University of Missouri—Columbia of Missouri, 

dated May 8, 2020.

ML20127H882 (non-public, withheld pursuant to 10 

CFR 2.390). 

Request for Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Safety Evaluation Report for Proposed Decommissioning Project at South Farm Site, Curators of the University of Missouri—Columbia, Columbia, 

Missouri, and the Dose Assessment for the South Farm—License No. 24–00513–32, dated November 9, 

2020.

ML20329A267 (non-public, withheld pursuant to 10 

CFR 2.390). 

Comment Resolution on Draft Environmental Assessment and Safety Evaluation Report for the Proposed Decommissioning Project at South Farm Site, Curators of the University of Missouri—Columbia; Columbia, 

Missouri, and the Dose Assessment for South Farm—License Number 24–00513–32, dated April 19, 2022.

ML21299A026 (non-public, withheld pursuant to 10 

CFR 2.390). 

Response to Comment Resolution on Draft Environmental Assessment and Safety Evaluation Report for the 

Proposed Decommissioning Project at South Farm Site, Curators of the University of Missouri—Columbia; 

Columbia, Missouri, and the Dose Assessment for South Farm—License Number 24–00513–32, dated 

May 19, 2022.

ML22146A346. 

Environmental Assessment for Release of South Farm Site at Curators of the University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; Materials License 24-0051332, Docket 030–02278.ML23279A056. 

Safety Evaluation Report for Release of South Farm Site at the Curators of the University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; Materials License 24–00513–32, Docket 030–02278.ML23278A150. 

Dated: October 23, 2023. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michael M. LaFranzo, 

Senior Health Physicist, Decommissioning, 

Reactors, ISFSI and Health Physics Branch, 

Division of Radiological Safety and Security, 

Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2023–23695 Filed 10–26–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY 

CORPORATION 

Proposed Submission of Information 

Collection for OMB Review; Comment 

Request; Disclosure of Termination 

Information 

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to request 

extension of OMB approval of an 

information collection. 

SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation (PBGC) intends to request 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) extend approval, under 

the Paperwork Reduction Act, of a 

collection of information on the 

disclosure of termination information 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
73888 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2023 / Notices 

under its regulations for distress 

terminations and for PBGC–initiated 

terminations (OMB control number 

1212–0065; expires April 30, 2024). 

This notice informs the public of 

PBGC’s intent and solicits public 

comment on the collection of 

information. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 26, 2023 to be 

assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: paperwork.comments@

pbgc.gov. Refer to Disclosure of 

Termination Information in the subject 

line. 

• Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory 

Affairs Division, Office of the General 

Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation, 445 12th Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20024–2101. 

Commenters are strongly encouraged 

to submit comments electronically. 

Commenters who submit comments on 

paper by mail should allow sufficient 

time for mailed comments to be 

received before the close of the 

comment period. 

All submissions received must 

include the agency’s name (Pension 

Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or PBGC) 

and refer to Disclosure of Termination 

Information. All comments received 

will be posted without change to 

PBGC’s website, http://www.pbgc.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided. Do not submit comments that 

include any personally identifiable 

information or confidential business 

information. 

Copies of the collection of 

information may be obtained without 

charge by writing to the Disclosure 

Division, (disclosure@pbgc.gov), Office 

of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit 

Guaranty Corporation, 445 12th Street 

SW, Washington, DC 20024–2101; or, 

calling 202–229–4040 during normal 

business hours. If you are deaf or hard 

of hearing, or have a speech disability, 

please dial 7–1–1 to access 

telecommunications relay services. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Monica O’Donnell (o’donnell.monica@

pbgc.gov), Law Clerk, Regulatory Affairs 

Division, Office of the General Counsel, 

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 

445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 

20024–2101; 202–229–8706. If you are 

deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech 

disability, please dial 7–1–1 to access 

telecommunications relay services. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sections 

4041 and 4042 of the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 

as amended (‘‘ERISA’’), 29 U.S.C 1301– 

1461, govern the termination of singleemployer defined benefit pension plans 

that are subject to title IV of ERISA. A 

plan administrator may initiate a 

distress termination pursuant to section 

4041(c), and PBGC may itself initiate 

proceedings to terminate a pension plan 

under section 4042 if PBGC determines 

that certain conditions are present. 

Under sections 4041 and 4042 of ERISA, 

upon a request by an affected party, a 

plan administrator must disclose 

information it has submitted to PBGC in 

connection with a distress termination 

filing, and a plan administrator or plan 

sponsor must disclose information it has 

submitted to PBGC in connection with 

a PBGC-initiated termination. The 

provisions also require PBGC to disclose 

the administrative record relating to a 

PBGC-initiated termination upon 

request by an affected party. 

The existing collection of information 

was approved through April 30, 2024, 

under OMB control number 1212–0065. 

PBGC intends to request that OMB 

extend its approval of this collection of 

information for 3 years. An agency may 

not conduct or sponsor, and a person is 

not required to respond to, a collection 

of information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

PBGC estimates that approximately 30 

plans will terminate as distress or 

PBGC-initiated terminations each year 

and that two participants or other 

affected parties of every nine distress 

terminations or PBGC-initiated 

terminations filed will annually make 

requests for termination information, or 

2⁄9 of 30 (approximately 7 per year). 

PBGC estimates that the hour burden for 

each request will be about 20 hours. 

PBGC expects that the staff of plan 

administrators and sponsors will 

perform the work in-house and that no 

work will be contracted to third parties. 

The total annual hour burden is 

estimated to be 140 hours (7 plans × 20 

hours), and the total annual cost burden 

is estimated to be $0. 

PBGC is soliciting public comments 

to— 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodologies and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Issued in Washington, DC. 

Hilary Duke, 

Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory 

Affairs, Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 2023–23722 Filed 10–26–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7709–02–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. MC2024–21 and CP2024–21; 

MC2024–22 and CP2024–22; MC2024–23 

and CP2024–23; MC2024–24 and CP2024– 

24] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

a negotiated service agreement. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: October 30, 

2023. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

I. Introduction 

The Commission gives notice that the 

Postal Service filed request(s) for the 

Commission to consider matters related 

to negotiated service agreement(s). The 

request(s) may propose the addition or 

removal of a negotiated service 

agreement from the Market Dominant or 

the Competitive product list, or the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1