alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
jQuery(document).ready(function() {

    function createDataTables() {
        //targeting table with class datatable
        // add "aaSorting" to disable default sort
        jQuery('table.datatable, div.field-name-field-data-table-csv table, div.datatable table.views-table').DataTable({
            aaSorting: [],
            retrieve:true
        });
        //508 compliance calls and set title attributes
        jQuery('th').attr('scope', 'col');
        jQuery('td').removeAttr('tabindex');
        jQuery('tfoot').remove();
        jQuery('.sorting_asc').attr('title','This is a sortable column in a HTML data table that is sorted ascending.');
        jQuery('.sorting').attr('title','No sort applied to this column.');
        jQuery('.dataTables_filter').find('label').attr('for','datatables_search');
        jQuery('.dataTables_filter').find('input').attr('id','datatables_search');

        //this applies the default sort arrows to our datatable
        jQuery('.datatable th:nth-child(n+1)').append("<img class='sort_arrow' src='/profiles/femad8_gov/themes/fema_uswds/images/icon_table_nosort.png' align='right' alt='No sort applied to this column.'>");

        //the binding event that fires when we sort on a column - 508 compliant version on img
        jQuery('.sorting, .sorting_asc').bind('click keypress', function(e) {
            var this_index = jQuery(this).index();
            jQuery('thead').each(function () {
                jQuery('th', this).each(function () {
                    var td_index = jQuery(this).index();
                    if (td_index != this_index) {
                        jQuery(this).find('.sort_arrow').remove();
                        jQuery(this).append("<img class='sort_arrow' src='/profiles/femad8_gov/themes/fema_uswds/images/icon_table_nosort.png' align='right' alt='No sort applied to this column.'>");
                    }
                })
            })
            //we use aria-label to determine the state, ascending or descending
            var aria_t = jQuery(this).attr('aria-label');
            aria_value = aria_t.split(':')[1];
            if (aria_value.toLowerCase().indexOf("ascending") >= 0) {
                //we are switching state so provide the opposite
                jQuery(this).attr('title', 'This is a sortable column in a HTML data table that is sorted descending.');
                jQuery(this).find('img').attr('src','/profiles/femad8_gov/themes/fema_uswds/images/icon_table_descending.png');
                jQuery(this).find('img').attr('alt','This column is sorted descending. Click to sort ascending.');
            } else {
                jQuery(this).attr('title', 'This is a sortable column in a HTML data table that is sorted ascending.');
                jQuery(this).find('img').attr('src','/profiles/femad8_gov/themes/fema_uswds/images/icon_table_ascending.png');
                jQuery(this).find('img').attr('alt','This column is sorted ascending. Click to sort descending.');
            }
            jQuery('td').removeAttr('tabindex');
            e.preventDefault();
        })

    }
});
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert I. Kriebel, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/    ROBERT I.
KRIEBEL                     
|---------------------------------------------
|Robert I. Kriebel Principal Financial Officer



August 7, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Candace Sikorski, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mystica Candle Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of September, 2006.


/s/ Candace Sikorski
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8
v. NO. 30,284 9 DANA EICHER, 10 Defendant-Appellant. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 12 Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge 13 Gary K. King, Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellee 16 Dana Eicher 17 Grants, NM 18 Pro se Appellant 19
MEMORANDUM OPINION 20 CASTILLO, Judge. 212 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, 2 and the time for doing so has expired. 3 Dismissed. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

___________________________________ 6 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

__________________________________ 9 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 10

__________________________________ 11 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge 12
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Siew Man Pang, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of China Health Care
      Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2008(the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of China Health Care Corporation.                                                          

Dated: October 24, 2008



| | /s/
      Siew Man Pang      
| | -----------------------------
| | Siew Man Pang                
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | China Health Care Corporation



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to China Health
Care Corporation and will be retained by China Health Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “***Report***”), I, A. Brian Davis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ A. Brian Davis     A. Brian Davis  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: 5/4/07
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode**I, Carl F. Dill, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Technology Solutions Company, certify that: (i) The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofTechnology Solutions Company.        Date:  May 15, 2006 By:  /s/ CARL F. DILL, JR.    Carl F. Dill, Jr.Chief Executive Officer      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act hasbeen provided to Technology Solutions Company and will be retained by Technology Solutions Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
A89A2115.

#### ROYAL v. HARRINGTON.

(390 SE2d 668)

Cooper, Judge.

On August 30, 1988, appellee/client Harrington filed suit against appellant/attorney Royal, alleging legal malpractice. We granted appellant’s application for interlocutory review of the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss, which was based on the expiration of the period of limitation. In his complaint, appellee averred that he had hired appellant to represent him in the sale of his business and *458that, on September 14, 1984, appellant had filed in the wrong county the financing statement executed by the purchaser. The financing statement assigned property valued at $92,138.60 to appellee to secure payment of the note. The purchaser subsequently defaulted on its note to appellee and, because appellant had allegedly filed the financing statement in the wrong county, appellee’s lien was inferior to another properly filed lien. Appellee alleged that appellant’s failure to exercise a reasonable degree of skill and care had damaged appellee in the amount of $92,138.60.

Decided February 9, 1990.

*Richard D. Phillips, J. Kenneth Royal,*for appellant.

*Boatright & Futch, Jimmy J. Boatright,*for appellee.

“It has long been the law in this state that a cause of action for legal malpractice, alleging *negligence or unskillfullness,*sounds in *contract*(agency) and, in the case of an oral agreement, is subject to the four-year statute of limitation in OCGA § 9-3-25. (Cits.)” *Ballard v. Frey,*179 Ga. App. 455 (3) (346 SE2d 893) (1986). See also *Ekern v. Westmoreland,*181 Ga. App. 741 (353 SE2d 571) (1987). “ ‘In Georgia legal malpractice is based upon the breach of a duty imposed by the attorney-client contract of employment, and as such, the applicable statute of limitation is four years.’ ” *Loftin v. Brown,*179 Ga. App. 337 (1) (346 SE2d 114) (1986). As was the case in *Ballard v. Frey,*supra, “[appellee] in the instant case does not seek tort damages for any ‘injuries to the person’ within the ambit of OCGA § 9-3-33. He seeks only those damages alleged to be the result of [appellant’s] negligent breach of his contract of employment. [Cits.]” Id. at 459. Thus, the two-year period of limitation for injury to the person is not applicable. Id. See also *Loftin v. Brown,*supra. Despite dicta to the contrary in *Loftin,*this is a suit on a contract, albeit for negligent breach of the contract.

“ ‘(A)n action for attorney malpractice accrues and the period of limitations begins to run, from the date of the attorney’s breach of duty, that is, from the date of the alleged negligent or unskillful act.’ [Cit.]” *Loftin v. Brown,*supra, Div. 1. Inasmuch as appellee alleged that appellant was negligent on September 14, 1984, the date the financing statement was allegedly misfiled, and the lawsuit was filed on August 30, 1988, within four years of the date of the alleged negligent or unskillful act, the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*
No. 66155.

#### I. D. L. Mfg. & Sales Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 260181-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hand-operated, 2-hole paper punches similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. I. *D. L. Mfg. & Sales Corp.*(48 C.C.P.A. 17, C.A.D. 756), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

July	31,	2015

Docket	Operations,	M-30

U.S. Department	of	Transportation (DOT)

1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE

Room	W12-140,	West	Building	Ground	Floor

Washington,	D.C.	20590-0001

RE:	Amendment	to	StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC	Exemption	No.	12205.

Dear	Sir or	Madam:

StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC	was	issued	an	exemption	under	Section	333	of	the	“FAA	

Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012”	numbered	12205 for	the	purposes	to	

conduct	aerial	photography	and	videography. StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC,	hereby	

requests	an	amendment	to	our	FAA	Exemption	No. 12205,	Docket	No.	FAA-2015-

1873 to	allow	additional	UAS	to	be	operated	in	full	compliance	with	the	conditions	

set	forth	within	Exemption	No.	12205.

StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC	requests	permission	to	operate	the	following	UAS	based	on	

their	type,	size,	weight	and	speed	under the	same	terms	and	conditions	contained	

within	Exemption	No.	12205 and	provided	by	the	parameters	set	forth	in	regards	to	

capabilities	and	limitations	identified	within	the	attached	manuals.

1. DJI	Phantom	3

2. DJI	S1000+

3. 3DR	Solo

Thank	you	for	your	time	and	consideration	with	our	request.	Feel	free	to	contact	us	

with	any	additional	questions.

Sincerely,	

/s/	Nicholas	Flom

____________________________________

Nicholas	Flom Managing	Partner,	StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC
WMD

- HW

- 11 20 14



## Identification of Hazardous Waste As provided in the New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules, E nv

- Hw 100

- 1100

The New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules , Env

- Hw 103.62 , define hazardous waste as any solid, semi

solid, liquid or containe d gaseous waste, or any combination of these wastes, which:

a. May cause or contribute to an increase in irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness. b. Poses a present or potential threat to human health or the environment if improperly managed.

c. Has been identified as a hazardous waste by the Waste Management Division.

Characteristics of a Hazardous Waste

1. Is it ignitable? (flash point <60° Celsius or <140° F as per Env

- Hw 403.03) 2. Is it corrosive? ( pH < 2.0 or > 12.5 as per Env

- Hw 403.04 ) 3. Is it reactive? (reacts violently with water or air; is explosive, or cyanide or sulfide

- bearing

– see Env

- Hw 403.05) 4. Does it fail the Toxicity Characteri stic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)? (contains heavy metals, pesticides, herbicides or organics l isted in Env

- Hw 403.06)

(If you answered “yes” to any of the above, the waste is considered hazardous.)

Lists of Hazardous Wastes

1. Is it listed in E nv

- Hw 402.04? (acutely hazardous wastes, P

- listed) 2. Is it listed in E nv

- Hw 402.05? (toxic hazardou s wastes, U

- listed) 3. Is it listed in E nv

- Hw 402.06? (generic industrial process wastes, F

- listed) 4. Is it listed in E nv

- Hw 402.07? (specific industrial process wastes, K

- listed) 5. Is it a hazardous waste mixture pursuant to Env

- Hw 404.01? 6. See C hapter Env

- Hw 400 of the Hazardous Waste Rules for additional information.

(If you answered “yes” to any of the above, the waste is considered hazardous.)

For more information: Questions regarding this fact sheet should be directed to the NH DES, Waste Ma nagement Division at (603) 271

- 2942 or toll free withi n New Hampshire at 866

- HAZWAST. For a complete description of the requirements, refer to the New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules, Env

- Hw 100

- 1100, available from NH DES ’ website at www.des.nh.gov

.

## HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION Is it a waste?
Yes

* New Hampshire’s mixture rule rem ains slightly more stringent tha n EPA ’ s since New Hampshire regulates the mixture of any list ed hazardous waste with any waste or material. Revised 7/2014 START

Is the waste exempt from NH

Hazardous Waste Rules? (Env

- Hw 401.03)

Is the waste a listed hazardous waste? (Env

- Hw 402)

Does the waste exhibit a hazardous characteri stic? (Env

- Hw 403)

Is the waste a regulated hazardous waste mixture?

(Env

- Hw 404.01 is NH’s equivalent to 40 CFR 261.3 * )

Is the source of the contamination known to contain or be derived from a

listed hazardous waste? (Env

- Hw 404.02, Env

- Hw 404.03, Type P, U, F, or K) MANAGE AS HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGE AS SOLID WASTE Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes

No

No

No

No

No
Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd H. Takeyasu,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Todd H. Takeyasu                                
|    |  | Todd H. Takeyasu                                    
|    |  | Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

March 16, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            26,990,232
<SECURITIES>                                      18,802,820
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  46,790,361
<PP&E>                                            16,016,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2,098,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    60,711,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,887,932
<BONDS>                                           10,082,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              95,139
<OTHER-SE>                                        49,692,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      60,711,246
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     708,667
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   8,391,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   388,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (6,051,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (6,051,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (6,051,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.65)
         

</TABLE>
No. 57101.

protests 190368-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### F. Lagomarsino & Sons and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed *(Lotus corniculatus)*similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated)*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.