alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven J. Murphy, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Natus Medical Incorporated; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.9

                                    EXHIBIT A

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                             MFH FINANCIAL TRUST III

         THIS Certificate of Trust of MFH Financial Trust III (the "Trust") is
being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a
statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801
et seq.)(the "Act").

         1.       Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is MFH
Financial Trust III.

         2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention:
Corporate Trust Administration.

         3.       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate in
accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

                                          WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY

                                          By: /s/ Joann A. Rozell
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Joann A. Rozell
                                              Title: Financial Services Officer

                                          /s/ Michael L. Falcone
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          MICHAEL L. FALCONE, as Trustee

                                          /s/ William S. Harrison
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          WILLIAM S. HARRISON, as Trustee

                                          /s/ Mark K. Joseph
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          MARK K. JOSEPH, as Trustee
Remote Aerial Camera Systems Remote Aerial Camera Systems www.vortexaerial.com www.vortexaerial.com (714) 916

- 3614



## RC Pro Production Consultng LLC vortex.aerial@live.com 1/19/2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Petitioner : Vortex Aerial LLC 1930 Oakridge Drive Corona Ca 92882 vortex.aerial@live.com

Request to extend Exemption #11064 under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act and Part

11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.P.R. 61.23(a) and (c); 61.101(e)(4) and (5); 61.113(a);

61.315(a); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(a)(1); 91.4 05(a); 91.407(a)(l); 91.409(a)(1) and (2); 91.417(a) & (b).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernizat ion and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.P.R. Part 11, the

petitioner, RC Pro Production Consulting LLC dba Vortex Aerial

, (Vortex Aerial ) a California Limited L iability

Company, files thi s petition for extension of the attached, currently active 333 exemption #11064 issued April

29 2015 and set to expire September 30 2016. Vortex Aerial was a member of the first group of seven 333

exemp tions g ranted September 25 2014 the original pe tition of which is attached

.

Procedures and Documentation: As per the attached original petition and exemption #11064, no material facts

in regards to aircraft, pilot qualifications, or operational procedure and documentation have chan ged since the

original petition. Petitioner requests to proceed as business as usual.

Public Interest: Extension for petitioner will allow commercial operation of the VA01 co axial quad multirotor,

VA02 coaxial quad multirotor, VA03 hexacopter multirotor, and VA04

- v1 quadcopter

, for scripted closed set

filming for the motion picture and television and data collection industries in Class G airspace nationwide, or as

otherwise prescribed in a n Air Traffic Organization issued COA. The s UAS operations listed in this petition are

in the public interest because they provide an equivalent or greater level of safety than alternative manned

aircraft operations that carry a pilot and passenger(s) weigh thousands of pounds as well as carry highly

flammable liquid fuels . The s U AS covered by exemption #11064 are small battery

- powered air craft, weighing

no more than 55lbs including battery and payload. They carry no flammable or explosive liquid fuels or any

pilot or passengers, fly below 40 0 feet AGL, and at speeds below 100MPH. Op eration of these sUAS under the

strict conditions proposed in the original attached petition and subsequent exemption #11064 will provide an

equivalent or greater level of safety to the public while still allowing effective commercia l operations thus

enhancing commerce

.

1Remote Aerial Camera Systems Remote Aerial Camera Systems www.vortexaerial.com www.vortexaerial.com (714) 916

- 3614



## RC Pro Production Consultng LLC vortex.aerial@live.com
DENY and Opinion Filed June 16, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00542-CV

IN RE CHRISTOPHER PITTS AND CHRISTINA PITTS, Relators

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-02155-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

In their June 3, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relators seek a writ of 

mandamus compelling the trial court to withdraw its version of the proposed special 

needs trust and enter settlement based on the parties’ papers. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief generally requires: a legal duty to perform a 

non-discretionary act; a demand for performance; and a refusal. In re Cullar, 320 

S.W.3d 560, 564 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, orig. proceeding). Here, the record does 

not show that a demand was made to the trial court to withdraw its version of the 

trust—the act relators request this Court to compel. The record also does not show 

that relators raised their argument that the trial court abused its discretion by 

preparing its own version of the trust. See In re Rowes, No. 05-14-00606-CV, 2014 
–2–

WL 2452723, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 30, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) 

(noting that “[a] court cannot grant mandamus relief unless the error was raised in 

the trial court,” and that a party seeking mandamus “must direct the Court to where 

the argument was presented to the trial court”). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus based on relators’ 

failure to satisfy the demand requirement for mandamus relief. Having denied the 

petition, we also deny relators’ June 8, 2022 motion to expedite as moot.

220542f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III/ 

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
No. 59363.

protests 240582-K, etc. (New York).

#### C. J. Scarf & Novelty Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*276Opinion by

Foed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles of wearing apparel similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Staten*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32% percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0929 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-CE-31-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6109

JAMES L. JACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER FLOURNOY, Guard; OFFICER BROWN, Guard; OFFICER LEVESQUE, Guard; LIEUTENANT WERLIN, Shift Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-98-624) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaintfor his failure to either pay the filing fee or consent to collections being made from his prison trust fund. Appellant’s informal brief discusses only the substance of his complaint. We therefore dismiss his appeal as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2022288EN.01008101.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 288/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 288/81

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2022/2186

of 8 November 2022

amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 11 November 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 11 November 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean.

| (2) | The Council has reviewed the restrictive measures set out in Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894. Based on that review, those measures should be extended until 12 November 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council has reviewed the restrictive measures set out in Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894. Based on that review, those measures should be extended until 12 November 2023.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 8 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 8

This Decision shall apply until 12 November 2023 and shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2022.

For the Council

The President

Z. STANJURA

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 of 11 November 2019 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean (OJ L 291, 12.11.2019, p. 47).

1

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Force Minerals Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending November 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tim DeHerrera, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/Tim DeHerrera By: Tim DeHerrera Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Dated: March 9, 2015  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000877908
<NAME>                          Centigram Communications Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                         24,249
<SECURITIES>                                   31,033
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               70,420
<PP&E>                                         3,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,601
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       90,102
<OTHER-SE>                                     (24,624)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   83,079
<SALES>                                        19,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,014
<CGS>                                          5,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                   302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,192
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.18



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Steven G. Manson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Steven G. Manson
                                        ----------------------------------------
Dated: May 15, 2003                     Steven G. Manson
                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Artisoft, Inc. and will be retained by Artisoft, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 263/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 263 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5920 July 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 263

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5920 July 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 263/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8080 — Maxburg II/VREP/Norafin) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 263/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8094 — BNP Paribas Fortis Private Equity Belgium/Sofindev IV/DHAM/Novy International) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 263/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8080 — Maxburg II/VREP/Norafin) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 263/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8094 — BNP Paribas Fortis Private Equity Belgium/Sofindev IV/DHAM/Novy International) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 263/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems |
| 2016/C 263/04 | Decision No H8 of 17 December 2015 (updated with minor technical clarifications on 9 March 2016) concerning the methods of operation and the composition of the Technical Commission for Data Processing of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 263/03

Euro exchange rates

2

Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems

2016/C 263/04

Decision No H8 of 17 December 2015 (updated with minor technical clarifications on 9 March 2016) concerning the methods of operation and the composition of the Technical Commission for Data Processing of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 263/05 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2016/C 263/05

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN