alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3180

___________

Forrest G. Aubrey, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Department of Labor, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 5, 2001

 Filed: June 7, 2001 

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Forrest G. Aubrey, Jr. appeals the District Court’s1 order dismissing his action

under the Black Lung Benefits Act (Act). Aubrey initially applied for benefits under

the Act on January 20, 1976. He was subsequently awarded benefits, payable by the

Black Lung Disability Benefits Trust Fund (Fund), as of February 1995. Aubrey’s date

of entitlement was then modified three times, resulting in three separate additional

awards of back benefits. In the instant action Aubrey seeks interest on two of the
-2-

awards of back benefits, and claims additional damages based on the delay in awarding

benefits, alleging that the Department of Labor withheld and used his money while it

denied him benefits to which it knew he was entitled. 

Having conducted de novo review, we conclude that the District Court properly

dismissed Aubrey’s complaint. See 30 U.S.C. § 922 (1994) (describing benefits

payable under Act); 30 U.S.C. § 932(a) (1994) (incorporating 33 U.S.C. § 921 into

Act); 33 U.S.C. § 921(d) (1994) (district court’s jurisdiction is limited to enforcing

final awards to beneficiaries); Greene v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs,

U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 892 F.2d 1385, 1387 (8th Cir. 1990) (order amending judgment

and awarding attorneys fees) (deleting from prior court order award of interest for

period of time when benefits under Act were withheld, citing 20 C.F.R. § 725.608(d)

and "longstanding law" that interest against U.S. instrumentality is not permitted unless

specifically authorized by statute); 20 C.F.R. § 725.608(d) (2000) (Fund shall be liable

for payment of interest only on advances from United States Treasury).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 396 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 396

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Celebrating the birth of James Madison and his contributions to the 
                                Nation.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 396

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas March 16, 2001, is the 250th anniversary of the birth of James Madison, 
        Father of the United States Constitution and fourth President of the 
        United States;
Whereas the ideals of James Madison, as expressed in the Constitution he 
        conceived for the American Nation and in the principles of freedom he 
        established in the Bill of Rights, are the foundations of American 
        Government and life;
Whereas James Madison's lifetime of public service, as a member of the Virginia 
        House of Delegates, as a delegate to the Continental Congress during the 
        American Revolution, as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in 
        1787, as a leader in the House of Representatives, as Secretary of 
        State, and as the Nation's fourth President, are an inspiration to all 
        men, women, and children in the conduct of their personal and private 
        lives; and
Whereas the ideals and inspiring example of James Madison are of utmost 
        importance to the future of the American Nation as it enters a new 
        millennium: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the historical significance of James 
        Madison's birth, as well as his contributions to the Nation 
        during his lifetime;
            (2) urges all American patriotic and civil associations, 
        labor organizations, schools, universities, historical 
        societies, and communities of learning and worship, together 
        with citizens throughout the United States, to develop 
        appropriate programs and educational activities to recognize 
        and celebrate the life and achievements of James Madison; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        recognizing the 250th anniversary of the birth of James Madison 
        and calling upon the people of the United States to observe the 
        life and legacy of James Madison with appropriate ceremonies 
        and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.44



                                IRREVOCABLE PROXY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the  undersigned  does hereby make,
constitute and appoint Oded Bashan, its true and lawful attorney,  for it and in
its name, place and stead, to act as its proxy in respect of all of the ordinary
shares  of On  Track  Innovations  Ltd.,  an  Israeli  corporation  (hereinafter
referred to as the  "Corporation"),  which it now or hereafter  may own or hold,
including,  without limitation,  the right, on its behalf, to demand the call by
any proper officer of the Corporation pursuant to the provisions of its charter,
memorandum of association or other organizational  documents and as permitted by
law of a meeting of its shareholders and at any meeting of shareholders, annual,
general or special, to vote for the transaction of any and all business that may
come before such meeting,  or at any  adjournment  thereof,  including,  without
limitation,  the right to vote for the sale of all or any part of the  assets of
the  Corporation  and/or the  liquidation  and  dissolution of the  Corporation;
giving and granting to said  attorney full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing  whether  necessary  or desirable to be done in and
about the premises,  as fully as it might or could do if personally present with
full power of  substitution,  appointment and revocation,  hereby  ratifying and
confirming  all that  said  attorneys  shall  do or  cause to be done by  virtue
hereof.

         This Proxy is given to Oded Bashan in  consideration of the performance
of the Term  Sheet  dated  the  date  hereof  between  the  undersigned  and the
Corporation, and this Proxy shall not be revocable or revoked by the undersigned
and shall be binding upon his successors and assigns.

         The undersigned shall execute and deliver such additional documents and
instruments  as the  Corporation or Oded Bashan may require to confirm the grant
hereby, including,  without limitation,  such instruments as may be necessary or
appropriate under Israeli law.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Irrevocable Proxy
this 27th day of June, 2003.


                                      GOLDSTRAND INVESTMENT


                                      By: /s/ Seth Fireman
                                            Name:  Seth Fireman
                                            Title: Managing Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice

      ( print page 73416)    

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for effective date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action(s)

On July 31, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 73417)    
      ( print page 73418)    
Dated: October 20, 2023.

Bradley T. Smith,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2023-23566 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 37

Concerning anti-Semitic statements made by members of the Duma of the

Russian Federation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. WOLF, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. PORTER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. SALMON, AND Mr. MARKEY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning anti-Semitic statements made by members of the

Duma of the Russian Federation.

Whereas the world has seen in the 20th century the disastrous results of ethnic, religious, and racial intolerance;

Whereas the Government of the Russian Federation is on

record, through obligations freely accepted as a participating state of the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), as pledging to ‘‘clearly and

equivocally condemn totalitarianism, racial and ethnic hatred, anti-Semitism, xenophobia and discrimination

against anyone . . .’’;
2

•HCON 37 IH

Whereas at two public rallies in October 1998, Communist

Party member of the Duma, Albert Makashov, blamed

‘‘the Yids’’ for Russia’s current problems;

Whereas in November 1998, attempts by members of the

Russian Duma to formally censure Albert Makashov were

blocked by members of the Communist Party;

Whereas in December 1998, the chairman of the Duma Defense Committee and Communist Party member, Viktor

Ilyukhin, blamed President Yeltsin’s ‘‘Jewish entourage’’

for alleged ‘‘genocide against the Russian people’’;

Whereas in response to the public outcry over the abovenoted anti-Semitic statements, Communist Party chairman Gennadi Zyuganov claimed in December 1998 that

such statements were a result of ‘‘confusion’’ between Zionism and ‘‘the Jewish question’’; and

Whereas during the Soviet era, the Communist Party leadership regularly used ‘‘anti-Zionist campaigns’’ as an excuse to persecute and discriminate against Jews in the

Soviet Union: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) condemns anti-Semitic statements made by

4 members of the Russian Duma;

5 (2) commends actions taken by members of the

6 Russian Duma to condemn anti-Semitic statements

7 made by Duma members;

8 (3) commends President Yeltsin and other

9 members of the Russian Government for condemn-
3

•HCON 37 IH

1 ing anti-Semitic statements made by Duma mem2 bers; and

3 (4) reiterates its firm belief that peace and jus4 tice cannot be achieved as long as governments and

5 legislatures promote policies based upon anti-Semi6 tism, racism, and xenophobia.

Æ
% Worker exposure 2 weeks, 5 days/week exposure, 30 days no exposure
% From PBPK_SeedTreatmentScenarios_CPFOS.xlsx, Seed planting, mixer
% January 19, 2016
% Cecilia Tan


% Setting model parameters
use human_parameters_MRP
QPC = 62.38; 	% to get QALV = 16.7 L/min @BW = 69 kg
use preg_female_parameters
BWSW=1;	%Set BW to a fixed value
BWST=69;	%Set BW to 69 kg	
PREG=0;	%Not pregnant
DZONE = 1;	% Turn dermal exposure on
KDIS = 0.0;	%daily dissipation
TSTOP=1392;	%Simulation time in hours

% Dermal exposure
SAF=1;	 	% Fraction of skin in contact with chlorpyrifos.
FAD=1;     	% Fraction of dose available to be absorbed. Values of <1 could be used if pesticide is encapsulated. 
DERM =6.79;		% dose in ug/kg
D3=5;  %DAYS/WEEK
P2=8; %HRS/DAY
S2=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)
%W2=28; %28 day exposure
W2=14; %14 day exposure

% Inhalation exposure
CONCMGM=4.64E-6; % Inhalation concentration mg/m3. Value is largest value reported in monitoring data.
D3IN=5;  %DAYS/WEEK
P2IN=8; %HRS/DAY
S2IN=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)
%W2IN=28; %28 day exposure
W2IN=14; %14 day exposure

prepare @clear@all
start @NoCallback
simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6];	%conc unit = ug/L

%save simall @file='mixer_seed_planting_01192016' @format=ascii
save simall @file='mixer_seed_planting_01212016' @format=ascii
Biolase and NTL Agreement dated 8-5-03



 EXHIBIT 10.12 
  
 BIOLASE AND NTL AGREEMENT 
 August 5, 2003 
  
 These are the terms and
conditions by which National Technology Leasing Corporation, hereinafter NTL, and BIOLASE Technology, Inc., hereinafter BIOLASE, conduct any and all transactions between the Parties. This Agreement covers all transactions between NTL and BIOLASE.

  

	 	1.	 	BIOLASE will offer NTL first right of refusal as feasible when BIOLASE customers desire to use a finance or lease company. NTL understands BIOLASE customers are free to choose the
finance/lease company of their choice. 

  

	 	2.	 	NTL will give BIOLASE first priority on scheduling personnel to be at BIOLASE sales and marketing functions, and to process financing or leases for BIOLASE customers. NTL will train
its staff for, and ensure their ongoing prompt availability to BIOLASE. 

  

	 	3.	 	From time to time NTL will sponsor marketing programs for the benefit of BIOLASE and BIOLASE customers. 

  

	 	4.	 	All sales are FOB shipping point, shipping point being BIOLASE facility. All risks and rewards of ownership, and title, are transferred to NTL upon shipment.


  

	 	5.	 	NTL agrees that BIOLASE has satisfied all of its obligations to NTL upon shipment from BIOLASE facility or warehouse. 

  

	 	6.	 	NTL does not have the right to return products after they are shipped by BIOLASE. Furthermore, NTL does not have recourse against BIOLASE once product ships. Sales are final when
shipment occurs. 

  

	 	7.	 	BIOLASE terms and conditions supercede all other documents for all sales to BIOLASE customers including NTL. For any issue not addressed in this Agreement or in the case of a
conflict between the NTL Purchase Order and the BIOLASE Customer Order, the terms of the BIOLASE Customer Order will apply. 

  

	 	8.	 	The relationship between NTL and BIOLASE is that of independent contractors and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed or implied to create an agency, partnership,
joint venture, representative or employer and employee relationship. 

  

	 	9.	 	The term of this agreement is one year, 8/5/03 to 8/5/04, and can be renewed for one-year periods. If the parties continue doing business after the expiration date, then the terms
and conditions of this agreement apply. Either party may terminate this agreement with 45 days written notice. 

  

	 BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
	 	 	 	 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY LEASING CORP.

			
	/s/    JEFFREY W. JONES        	 	 	 	/s/    MICHAEL COFFELT        
	
	 	 	

	Jeffrey W. Jones	 	 	 	Michael Coffelt
	President & CEO	 	 	 	President & CEO
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 5, 2015 106486 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ADAM DAY,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 9, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Rose, JJ.

__________

John Ferrara, Monticello, for appellant.

James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Michael J.

Andreani of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan

County (LaBuda, J.), rendered December 19, 2013, convicting

defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale

of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts).

Faced with a five-count indictment and potential lengthy

consecutive sentences, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of

criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in

satisfaction of the indictment and waived his right to appeal in

exchange for a prison sentence of either 51⁄2 or 6 years. County

Court sentenced defendant, a second felony offender, to six years

in prison followed by a period of postrelease supervision. 

Defendant appeals arguing that his sentence is excessive.
-2- 106486 

We affirm. Assuming, without deciding, that defendant's

appeal waiver was invalid so as to permit consideration of the

sentence issue (see People v Rolley, 100 AD3d 1263, 1263-1264

[2012]; People v Caines, 268 AD2d 790, 791 [2000], lv denied 95

NY2d 833 [2000]; cf. People v Vellon, 128 AD3d 1274, 1275

[2015]), we nevertheless find neither an abuse of discretion nor

extraordinary circumstances meriting a reduction of defendant's

sentence in light of his criminal record and the imposition of a

sentence within the agreed range (see People v Rabideau, 130 AD3d

1094, 1095 [2015]).

Peters, P.J., Garry and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41590 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE RICARDO CORONA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-199-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Ricardo Corona appeals the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute in excess of 100 kilograms of marihuana. Corona argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred by denying him a downward adjustment under the safety-valve provision in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. The safety valve allows for sentencing below the statutory mandatory minimum sentence when certain conditions are met. Because the district court applied the safety valve and sentencedNo. 05-41590 -2- Corona below the five-year statutory mandatory minimum sentence in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B), we affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBIT 5


               Opinion of Surovell, Jackson, Colten & Dugan, P.C.

                                 April 30, 1998

SSE Telecom, Inc.
Suite 710
8230 Leesburg Pike
Vienna, Virginia  22182

Gentlemen:

         You have requested our opinion as counsel for SSE Telecom, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, for the public offering by the Company of up to 150,000
shares of common stock pursuant to its Employee Stock Purchase Plan for
employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.

         We have examined the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 in
the form to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
April 30, 1998 (the "Registration Statement"). We further have examined the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as certified by the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, the Bylaws and the minute books of the Company
as a basis for the opinion hereafter expressed.

         Based on the foregoing examination, we are of the opinion that, upon
issuance and sale in the manner described in the Registration Statement, the
shares of common stock covered by the Registration Statement will be legally
issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   SUROVELL, JACKSON, COLTEN & DUGAN, P.C.


                                   By:  /s/ G. Donald Markle
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                            G. Donald Markle

                                       10
----

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2183/2005 der Kommission vom 22. Dezember 2005 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1782/2003 des Rates mit gemeinsamen Regeln für Direktzahlungen im Rahmen der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik und mit bestimmten Stützungsregelungen für Inhaber landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 795/2004 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Betriebsprämienregelung gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1782/2003 des Rates

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 347 vom 30. Dezember 2005)

Seite 59, Artikel 48e Absatz 2 Buchstabe b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 795/2004:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

----