### 17140 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules

(2) If a federal credit union acquires premises for future expansion, it must partially occupy them within a reasonable period, but no later than three years after the date of acquisition. If the premises are unimproved land or unimproved real property, however, the three-year partial occupation requirement is extended to six years. NCUA may waive the partial occupation requirements. To seek a waiver, a
federal credit union must submit a written request to its regional office within 30 months after the property is acquired and fully explain why it needs the waiver. The regional director will provide the federal credit union a written response, either approving or disapproving the request. The regional
director’s decision will be based on safety and soundness considerations.

(3) A federal credit union must make diligent efforts to dispose of abandoned premises and any other real property it does not intend to use in transacting
business. The federal credit union must seek fair market value for the property, and record its efforts to dispose of abandoned premises. After premises have been abandoned for four years, the federal credit union must publicly advertise the property for sale. The federal credit union must complete the sale within five years of abandonment, unless NCUA waives this requirement. To seek a waiver, a federal credit union must submit a written request to its regional office and fully explain why it needs the waiver. The regional director will provide the federal credit union a written response, either approving or disapproving the request. The regional
director’s decision will be based on safety and soundness considerations.

(e) Prohibited Transactions. (1) A federal credit union must not acquire, or lease for one year or longer, premises from any of the following, unless NCUA waives this prohibition:

(i) A member of the federal credit union’s board of directors, credit committee, supervisory committee, or senior management, or an immediate family member of such individual;

(ii) A corporation in which a member
of the federal credit union’s board of directors, credit committee, supervisory committee, or senior management, or an immediate family member of such individual, is an officer or director, or has a stock interest of 10 percent or

more; or

(iii) A partnership, limited liability company, or other entity in which a
member of the federal credit union’s board of directors, credit committee, supervisory committee, or senior management, or an immediate family member of such individual, is a general partner, or a limited partner or entity member with an interest of 10 percent

or more.

(2) A federal credit union must not lease for one year or longer premises from any of its employees if the employee is directly involved in investments in fixed assets, unless the
federal credit union’s board of directors determines the employee’s involvement
is not a conflict of interest.

(3) All transactions with business associates or family members not specifically prohibited by this section must be conducted at arm’s length and
in the interest of the federal credit

union.

(4) To seek a waiver from any of the prohibitions in this section (e), a federal
credit union must submit a written request to its regional office and fully explain why it needs the waiver. Within 45 days of the receipt of the waiver request or all necessary documentation, whichever is later, the regional director will provide the federal credit union a written response, either approving or disapproving its request. The regional
director’s decision will be based on safety and soundness considerations
and a determination as to whether a
conflict of interest exists.

[FR Doc. 2013–06352 Filed 3–19–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7535–01–P**

**CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY**
**COMMISSION**

**[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2008–0005]**

**16 CFR Part 1634**

**Upholstered Furniture Fire Safety Technology; Meeting and Request for** 
**Comments**

**AGENCY :**  Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

**ACTION :**  Announcement of meeting and request for comments.

**SUMMARY :**  The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC, Commission, or we) is announcing its intent to hold a meeting on upholstered furniture fire safety technologies. The meeting will be held at the CPSC’s laboratory in Rockville, MD, on April 25, 2013. We invite interested parties to participate in or attend the meeting. We also invite interested parties to submit comments related to the meeting or the possible change in regulatory approach
discussed in this notice.

**DATES :**  The meeting will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on April 25, 2013. Individuals interested in serving on panels or presenting information at the meeting should register by March 25, 2013; all other individuals who wish to attend the meeting should register by April 18, 2013. Written comments must be received by July 1, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the CPSC’s National Product Testing and Evaluation Center, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850. Persons interested in serving on a panel, presenting information, or attending the meeting should register online at http://www.cpsc.gov/ meetingsignup.html and click on the link titled, ‘‘Upholstered Furniture Fire Safety Technology Meeting.’’

You may submit written comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC–2008– 0005, by any of the following methods:

Submit electronic comments in the following way: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through www.regulations.gov.

Submit written submissions in the following way:

Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions), preferably in five copies, to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504–7923.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to http://www.regulations.gov. Do not
submit confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information electronically. Such information should be submitted in writing.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Rohit Khanna, Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850, telephone 301–987–2508, email furnituretechmeeting@cpsc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Background

On March 4, 2008, the Commission published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) proposing a standard for the flammability of residential upholstered furniture. 73 FR 11702. The NPR originated from a petition submitted by the National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM) in 1993, and subsequent work by CPSC staff. The


### 17141 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules

history of the upholstered furniture rulemaking is summarized in the preamble to the NPR. 73 FR 11702. Under the NPR, upholstered furniture could meet the proposed standard by having either: (1) Upholstery cover material that complies with the prescribed smoldering ignition resistance test (called ‘‘Type I furniture’’) or (2) an interior fire barrier that complies with specified smoldering and open-flame ignition resistance tests (called ‘‘Type II furniture’’). The proposed rule set forth performance
tests to be conducted with materials installed in mockups (using standardized test materials) to simulate the intersection of the seating area of an item of upholstered furniture. At the time the NPR was published, CPSC staff stated that real scale validation testing
was needed to demonstrate that the bench-scale test approach in the NPR was adequate to address the fire performance of full-scale furniture. This point was also raised later in public comments received in response to the

NPR.

Since the Commission published the NPR, CPSC staff has conducted testingof upholstered furniture, using both fullscale furniture and bench-scale models, as proposed in the NPR. For this test series, the bench-scale performance did not demonstrate an adequate prediction of real furniture flammability performance, especially in thesmoldering ignition tests. The openflame ignition bench-scale qualification tests for fire barriers, however, do appear to result in improvements in full-scale fire performance. At this point, CPSC’s testing indicates significant promise for barriers as a means to address the flammability risk posed by upholstered furniture.

The Commission staff believes that fire barrier technology likely has advanced since publication of the NPR. One purpose of the Fire Safety Technology meeting is to gather
additional information about the current and anticipated progress in fire barrier technologies and their application to upholstered furniture. Another purpose is to discuss other technologies and options to reduce the fire hazard posed by residential furniture.

II. Topics for the Meeting

In general, the meeting will focus on current and anticipated progress on fire barrier technologies and other options to reduce the fire hazard posed by
residential furniture. We have identified the topics for the meeting below. In Section IV of this notice, we are seeking written comments on these topics as well as additional topics that are beyond the scope of what will be discussed at the meeting. We have identified the following specific topics we would like panelists to address at the meeting:

1. Fire Barriers

• Types of products available

• Materials and technologies used in fire
barriers

• Capabilities and limitations of fire
barriers

• Mattress fire barriers

• Cost considerations 2. Commercial Furniture Fire Safety Technologies

• Fire reduction strategies

• Applicability to residential furniture 3. Application of Other Fire Safety Technologies to Residential Furniture

• Fire technologies used in marine and
aviation furniture

• Fire technologies used in other countries

• Cost considerations

We will determine the order of the panel sessions once we confirm the number of panelists available for each topic area. We may combine, expand, or eliminate panel sessions, depending upon the level of interest. The final
schedule will be announced on our Web site by April 11, 2013.

III. Details Regarding the Meeting

A. When and where will the meeting be
held?

The meeting will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on April 25, 2013, at the CPSC’s Laboratory, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850.

B. How do you register for the meeting?

If you would like to be a panelist for a specific session of the meeting, you should register by March 25, 2013. (See
the **ADDRESSES** portion of this document
for the Web site link and instructions on where to register.) We also ask that you submit a brief (less than 200 word) abstract of your topic and area of expertise. If we receive more requests for a particular session from potential panelists than time will allow, staff will select panelists based on a variety of considerations, including: Whether the information to be presented has been received in previous open comment periods; the individual’s familiarity or expertise with the topic to be discussed; the practical utility in the information to be presented; the topic’s relevance to the identified theme and topic area. Although an effort will be made to accommodate all persons who wish to be panelists, we expect to limit each panel session to no more than approximately five panelists. Therefore, the final number of panelists may be
limited. We recommend that individuals and organizations with
common interests consolidate or coordinate their panelist requests. To assist in making final panelist selections, staff may ask potential panelists to submit planned presentations in addition to the initial abstract. We plan to notify selected panelists by April 4, 2013.

If you wish to attend and participate in the meeting, but you do not wish to be a panelist, you should register by April 18, 2013, and identify your affiliation. Every effort will be made to accommodate each person’s request; however, we may need to limit registration to meet the occupant capacity of our meeting rooms. If you are unable to attend the meeting in person, the meeting will be available through a webcast, but you will not be able to interact with the panels and presenters. You do not need to register
for the webcast.

If you wish to submit written comments, you may do so before or after the meeting, by any of the methods
stated in the **ADDRESSES** portion of this
notice. These comments should be received by July 1, 2013. Comments
should focus on new information that was not submitted previously that is related to the topic areas listed above.

C. What will be the format of the meeting?

The meeting will open with a plenary
session that includes a brief overview of the Commission’s past activities on the furniture flammability rulemaking. Following that, there will be a series of panels covering the topics listed above. Each panel session will consist of stakeholders and members of the public and will be moderated by CPSC staff. We expect potential panelists to speak for approximately 10 minutes each about their topic area. At the conclusion of the panel’s presentations, there will be a question, answer, and discussion session among the panelists and the audience, limited to the topics discussed by the panelists. Each panel session is expected to last approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes.

D. What happens if few people register for the meeting?
If fewer than 6 panelists or 20 participants register for the meeting, we may cancel the meeting. If we decide to cancel the meeting for this or any other reason, we will post a cancellation notice on the registration Web page for the meeting and send an email to each registered participant who provides a valid email address when registering.

IV. Request for Comments

We request comments on the possibility of moving from a regulatory


### 17142 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules

approach that primarily addresses fire deaths caused by smoldering ignition sources using bench scale models to one
that relies on the use of fire barriers to address fires started by multiple types of ignition sources (including smoking materials) by limiting fire growth similar to the performance requirements
in 16 CFR 1633. Staff has encountered problems with controlling standard materials (foam, fabric, barriers) when
used in bench scale tests with a smoldering ignition source. Staff
became concerned with the NPR approach when correlation of fire performance between bench scale tests
and full scale chair tests—when tested for smoldering ignition—was not
validated. Chairs tested with fire barriers consistently performed better than non-barrier chairs in open flame testing. In assessing the potential new strategy, CPSC staff is seeking information on the following questions:

1. Can fire barriers used by the mattress industry be used in upholstered furniture applications?

2. What modifications to mattress fire barriers, if any, are necessary to make them effective in upholstered furniture?

3. What technologies (Fire retardant (FR) chemicals, specialty fibers/fabrics without FR chemicals, inherently fire resistant materials, etc.) do fire barrier manufacturers use to achieve improved fire performance?

4. Do fire barrier manufacturers use FR chemicals to achieve improved fire performance? If so, are the FR chemicals covalently bonded to the barrier? What is the risk of human exposure from the specific FR chemicals used? What exposure testing and data exists for the specific FR chemicals used? Is the product that uses an FR chemical based
fire barrier labeled to indicate use of
such FR chemicals within it?

5. What, if any, FR chemicals are used
in mattress or other fire barrier technologies?

6. What are the cost considerations for using fire barriers? How does furniture manufacturing and assembling change
with a fire barrier?

7. Given the variety of ignition sources involved in furniture fires, which ignition sources resulting in
fatalities would fire barriers be effective in addressing the fatalities?

8. What fire safety technologies from commercial furniture can be applied to
residential furniture?

9. What fire safety technologies from other industries ( e.g., marine, aviation) can be applied to residential furniture?

10. For fire barrier materials that do not use FR chemical treatments, what
materials are used and what human exposure data exist for those materials? Dated: March 15, 2013.

Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 2013–06372 Filed 3–19–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**
**HUMAN SERVICES**

**Food and Drug Administration**

**21 CFR Parts 1, 16, 106, 110, 114, 117, 120, 123, 129, 179, and 211** 

**[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0920]**

**RIN 0910–AG36**

**Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based**  **Preventive Controls for Human Food;**
**Correction**

**AGENCY :**  Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is correcting a proposed rule that published in the Federal Register of January 16, 2013. That proposed rule would amend our regulation for current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packing, or holding human food (CGMPs) to modernize it and to add requirements for domestic and foreign facilities that are required to register under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) to establish and implement hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for human food. That proposed
rule also would revise certain definitions in our current regulation for registration of food facilities to clarify the scope of the exemption from registration requirements provided by the FD&C Act for ‘‘farms.’’ We proposed these actions as part of our announced
initiative to revisit the CGMPs since they were last revised in 1986 and to implement new statutory provisions in the FD&C Act. The document published with several typographical errors, stylistic errors (such as incorrect indentation of bulleted paragraphs and a gap in the sequential numbering of tables), and a mistake in the date of a reference. The document also published with an Appendix in which all references are numbered incorrectly.
This document corrects those errors.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jenny Scott, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–300), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240–

402–2166.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  FDA is correcting the January 16, 2013 (78 FR 3646), proposed rule entitled ‘‘Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based
Preventive Controls for Human Food.’’ The document published with several typographical errors, stylistic errors (such as incorrect indentation of bulleted paragraphs and a gap in the sequential numbering of tables), and a
mistake in the date of a reference. We
note that there are a total of 10 numbered tables in the preamble. These
tables are numbered as follows: Table 1 (page 3675), table 2 (page 3679), table 3 (page 3680), table 4 (page 3682), table 5 (page 3687), table 6 (page 3692), table 8 (page 3714), table 9 (page 3717), table 10 (page 3718), and table 11 (page 3728).
There is no table numbered ‘‘Table 7’’. We are not changing the table numbers to adjust the gap between tables 6 and
8 because the cross-references within the document to tables 8, 9, 10, and 11 are all correct, and because the gap between tables 6 and 8 is a stylistic error
that does not affect the substantive content of the document. We apologize for any confusion. The document also published with an Appendix in which all references are numbered incorrectly.
This document corrects those errors.

In FR Doc. 2013–00125, beginning on page 3646, in the Federal Register of Wednesday, January 16, 2013, we are making the following corrections:

1. On page 3650, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, in the last sentence, ‘‘Pub. L. 111–533’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘Public Law 111–353’’.

2. On page 3717, in the second column of ‘‘Table 9—Proposed Revisions for Consistency of Terms,’’ inthe first entry, ‘‘the phrase ‘‘foodproduction purposes (i.e., manufacturing, processing, packing, and holding) to consistently use the same group of terms in proposed part 117’’ is corrected by closing the quotation after the parenthetical phrase to read ‘‘the phrase ‘‘food-production purposes (i.e., manufacturing, processing, packing, and holding)’’ to consistently use the same group of terms in proposed part 117’’.

3. On page 3728, in the first column
of ‘‘Table 11—Potential Revisions to Establish Requirements in Place of Current Guidance,’’ in the fifth entry, ‘‘§ 117.40(a)(1)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘§ 117.40(a)(3)’’.

4. On page 3728, in the second
column of ‘‘Table 11—Potential Revisions to Establish Requirements in Place of Current Guidance,’’ in the fifth entry, the word ‘‘must’’ in ‘‘All