alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,646
<PP&E>                                          39,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,563)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,198
<SALES>                                          9,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,674
<CGS>                                          (4,160)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (4,160)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,408)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (16)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                       220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,917
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
**Exhibit99.8**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of Penn West Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for theyear ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd Takeyasu, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Penn West Petroleum Ltd., who performsthe same function for the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| By: /s/ Todd Takeyasu                                                          |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Todd Takeyasu                                                                  |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of  Penn West Petroleum Ltd. |
|                                                                           |
| March 26, 2007                                                                 |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-135200 and
333-148955) and Form S-3 (No. 333-148954) of Emergency Medical Services Corporation of our reports dated February 15, 2008, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Emergency Medical Services Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Emergency Medical Services Corporation as of December 31, 2007, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | ---------------------

Denver,
Colorado
February 25, 2008

---



QuickLinks
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6830

TODD E. COLLINS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:21:cv

- 00210

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : December 20, 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Todd E. Collins , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6830 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM:
Todd Collins , a state prison er, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely
filed.
In civil cases, p arties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its order on May 11, 2021 but did not set forth its judgment
in a separate document, and so the court’s order was deemed entered 150 days later , on
October 8, 2021. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(c)(2)(B); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii). Collins filed the notice of appeal on July 13, 2022. * Because Collins failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the postmark date appearing on the envelope containing the notice of appeal is the earliest date Collins could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). USCA4 Appeal: 22-6830 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre sented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6830 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
No. 63956.

protests 59/10069 and 59/6403 (San Francisco).

#### International Packers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 252

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding ensuring a competitive North

American market for softwood lumber.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 2000

Mr. KOLBE (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs.

KELLY, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. FOLEY, Mr.

NUSSLE, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. LEACH,

Mr. QUINN, Mr. COOK, Mr. KLECZKA, Mrs. THURMAN, Ms. PRYCE of

Ohio, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. CLAY, Mr. GREEN

of Texas, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mrs. CLAYTON,

Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. LATHAM, Mr.

HOUGHTON, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, and Mr. BOSWELL) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding ensuring

a competitive North American market for softwood lumber.

Whereas the United States and Canada have, since 1989,

worked to reduce tariff and nontariff barriers to trade;

Whereas free trade has greatly benefited the United States

and Canadian economies;

Whereas the United States and Canada have been engaged

in an ongoing dispute over trade in softwood lumber for

18 years;
2

•HCON 252 IH

Whereas on May 29, 1996, the United States and Canada entered into an agreement to temporarily resolve the dispute;

Whereas the United States-Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement of 1996 does not promote open trade;

Whereas the scope of the United States-Canada Softwood

Lumber Agreement of 1996 has been expanded, leading

to uncertainty for importers, distributors, retailers, and

purchasers of softwood lumber products;

Whereas the availability of affordable housing is important to

the American homebuyer;

Whereas lumber price volatility jeopardizes housing affordability; and

Whereas the United States-Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement of 1996 will expire on April 1, 2001: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States-Canada Softwood Lumber

4 Agreement of 1996 should terminate on April 1,

5 2001, with no extension or further quota agreement;

6 (2) the President should continue discussions

7 with the Government of Canada to promote open

8 and competitive trade between the United States

9 and Canada of softwood lumber; and

10 (3) the President should consult with all stake11 holders, including consumers of softwood lumber

12 products, in future discussions regarding the open
3

•HCON 252 IH

1 trade of softwood lumber between the United States

2 and Canada.

Æ
No. 66169.

#### Derby Foods, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 288004-K and 304940-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# L_2022105EN.01006701.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 105/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 105/67

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429 of 15 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 87 I of 15 March 2022
  )

On page 47, in the Annex, in entry 881, under the column ‘Identifying information’:

for:

‘DOB: 3.10.1948
  ’,

read:

‘DOB: 13.10.1948
  ’.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2099

HENRICO COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KANDISE N. LUCAS,

Movant - Appellant,

and

GREGORY MATTHEWS, as parent and next friend of G.M.; TONIE 

MATTHEWS, as parent and next friend of G.M.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00110-REP)

Submitted: October 19, 2020 Decided: October 28, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Kandise Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Miles Dumville, Kathleen Shepherd Mehfoud, 

Alison Ross Wickizer Toepp, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Kandise Lucas appeals the district court’s order granting in part the Henrico County 

School Board’s motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henrico Cnty.

Sch. Bd. v. Lucas, No. 3:18-cv-00110-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2019). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 56240.

protest 175949-K (New York).

#### Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 68570.

protest 62/15711 (San Francisco).

#### Indian Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1998             JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1998             MAR-27-1998
<CASH>                                           7,017                   7,017
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,599,580               2,599,580
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            129,036                 129,036
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        2,456,644               2,456,644
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             44,414                  44,414
<PP&E>                                           9,123                   9,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,556,402               3,556,402
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                   3,435,712               3,435,712
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          2,431,672               2,431,672
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               2,830                   2,830
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,018                   1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,672                 119,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,556,402               3,556,402
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                2,313                   8,625
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            33,825                 104,738
<COMMISSIONS>                                   14,791                  44,045
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    8,143                  19,071
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    6,243                  19,324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,612                  73,599
<COMPENSATION>                                  22,849                  64,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,369                  23,559
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,369                  23,559
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,863                  15,298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48                    1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48                    1.50
        

</TABLE>
No. 55758.

protests 156947-K, etc. (New York).

#### Accurate Millinery Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 394 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.394
                                    Agreed to September 13, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1374) to authorize the 
development and maintenance of a multiagency campus project in the town 
of Jackson, Wyoming, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the 
following corrections:
        (1) In section 1, strike ``1999'' and insert ``2000''.
        (2) In section 5(a), strike ``section 3'' and insert ``section 
    4''.
        (3) In section 7(a)(1), strike ``memorandum of agreement 
    referred to in section 4(a)(1)(A)'' and insert ``memorandum of 
    understanding referred to in section 4(a)(1)(B)''.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-091]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed October 6, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through October 16, 2023 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxapps.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-II/​public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20230138, Final, USACE, CO,*                     Halligan Water Supply Project,  Review Period Ends: 11/22/2023, Contact: Cody S. Wheeler 720-922-3846.                

*EIS No. 20230139, Draft, BLM, OR,*                     Hult Reservoir and Dam Safety,  Comment Period Ends: 12/7/2023, Contact: Dianne Olson 971-213-4970.                

*EIS No. 20230140, Final, USACE, MS,*                     Memphis Metropolitan Stormwater North DeSoto County Feasibility Study, DeSoto County, Mississippi,  Review Period Ends: 11/22/2023, Contact: Joshua Koontz 901-544-3975.                

*EIS No. 20230141, Draft, USACE, FL,*                     North of Lake Okeechobee Storage Reservoir Section 203 Study,  Comment Period Ends: 12/7/2023, Contact: Dr. Gretchen Ehlinger 904-232-1665.                

*EIS No. 20230142, Draft Supplement, BLM, AK,*                     Ambler Road Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement,  Comment Period Ends: 12/22/2023, Contact: Stacie McIntosh 907-378-3815.                

Dated: October 16, 2023.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2023-23385 Filed 10-19-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DECLINING TO RULE ON PETITIONER’S EX PARTE

MOTION TO DISMISS COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY

PAGE – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TERRY RICHARD MARTIN,

Petitioner, 

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-891-RSL-JPD

 CR03-370-RSL

ORDER DECLINING TO RULE 

ON PETITIONER’S EX PARTE

MOTION TO DISMISS COURTAPPOINTED ATTORNEY

The present matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s “Ex Parte Motion to

Dismiss Court Appointed Attorney,” filed November 16, 2007. Dkt. No. 34. The Court

declines to rule on this motion at this time, and notifies petitioner that this issue may be

considered only after the competency evaluation in this case has been completed. 

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to the Honorable

Robert S. Lasnik. 

DATED this 20th day of November, 2007.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00891-RAJ-JPD Document 36 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 1
No. P68/105.

protest 317106-K (Los Angeles).

No. P68/106.

protest 58/4607 (New York).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States, C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc. *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of miniature motors the same in all material respects as those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961); *H. H. Elder & Co. and T.V. Promotions Import Co. et al.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 397, Abstract 66651); and *Polks Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., and Meadows Wye & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 422, Abstract 60545), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-589
In Re: PHILLIP M. PROPST, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-151-MU) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip M. Propst, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Phillip M. Propst has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus from this court seeking to have this court order the North Carolina Superior Court Department of Justice to release discovery materials related to his criminal trial on state charges. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818,826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba Indian Tribe , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burdenof showing that he has “no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his entitlement to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S.33, 35 (1980). Propst has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant Propst leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED