alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 34

      Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1999

Mr. Stump (for himself, Mr. Evans, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Smith of New 
Jersey, Mr. Filner, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Spence, Ms. Brown 
    of Florida, Mr. Everett, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Peterson of 
 Minnesota, Mr. Quinn, Ms. Carson, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Stearns, 
   Mr. Snyder, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. 
Shows, Mrs. Chenoweth, Ms. Berkley, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Hansen, Mr. McKeon, 
  Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Coble, Mr. Hunter, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. 
 Franks of New Jersey, Mr. Saxton, and Mr. Cunningham) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Whereas the organization now known as the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United 
        States was founded in Columbus, Ohio, on September 29, 1899;
Whereas the VFW represents approximately 2,000,000 veterans of the Armed Forces 
        who served overseas in World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the 
        Persian Gulf War, and Bosnia; and
Whereas the VFW has, for the past 100 years, provided voluntary and unselfish 
        service to the Armed Forces and to veterans, communities, States, and 
        the Nation and has worked toward the betterment of veterans in general 
        and society as a whole: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 100th 
        anniversary of the founding of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of 
        the United States (the VFW);
            (2) congratulates the VFW on achieving that milestone;
            (3) commends the approximately 2,000,000 veterans who 
        belong to the VFW and thanks them for their service to their 
        fellow veterans and the Nation; and
            (4) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation 
        recognizing the anniversary of the VFW and the contributions 
        made by the VFW to veterans and the Nation and calling upon the 
        people of the United States to observe such anniversary with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                         ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (in thousands except for ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months
                                                  March 31,
                                                  ---------
                                             1998           1999
                                             ----           ----
                                               (unaudited)
<S>                                         <C>            <C>
Fixed Charges:
 Interest expensed ....................       $ 21,336       $ 26,219
 Interest capitalized .................         16,325         16,029
                                              --------       --------
   Total interest expense .............         37,661         42,248
 Interest component of rent expense....          1,322          2,147
 Amortization of debt issuance costs...            982          1,626
                                              --------       --------
   Total fixed charges ................       $ 39,965       $ 46,021
                                              ========       ========

Earnings:
 Income before income taxes ..........        $ 46,291       $ 67,992
 Plus fixed charges ..................          39,965         46,021
 Less interest capitalized ...........         (16,325)       (16,029)
                                              --------       --------
   Total earnings ....................        $ 69,931       $ 97,984
                                              ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               1.75x          2.13x
                                              ========       ========
</TABLE>
No. R67/100.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Incorporated *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/2418, etc. (Baltimore).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that such value is the invoice unit value, net packed.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.4(j)


                    THIRD AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE


         THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE (the "Amendment") is made
as of the ______ day of September, 2003, by and between SUNTRUST BANK (the
"Lender"), and CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., a Texas corporation (the
"Borrower").


                                    RECITALS:

         A. Borrower issued to the order of Lender a Revolving Credit Note dated
April 30, 2002, as most recently amended by a Second Amendment to Revolving
Credit Loan Agreement and Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Note dated
February 5, 2003 (the "Revolving Credit Note").

         B. The Borrower and Lender desire to amend the Note as provided herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
and obligations herein, the parties hereto agree that the Loan Agreement and the
Revolving Credit Note are hereby amended and modified as follows:

         1. The fourth paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated as
follows:

                  This Note shall be payable as follows: (a) commencing on the
         30th day of September, 2003 and on the last Business Day of each
         consecutive month thereafter through and including September 30, 2004,
         the Borrower shall pay to the Lender an amount equal to all then
         accrued interest; and (b) this Note shall mature on October 31, 2004,
         at which time the Borrower shall pay to the Lender an amount equal to
         all outstanding principal, plus all accrued and unpaid interest.

         2. The Note is not amended in any other respect.

         3. The Borrower reaffirms its obligations under the Note, as amended,
and the Borrower agrees that its obligations thereunder are valid and binding,
enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to no defense, counterclaim,
or objection.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned by and through their duly
authorized officers hereby execute this Amendment as of the day and date first
set forth above.

                                    CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC.,
                                    a Texas corporation


                                    By:      /s/ Jeff Hale
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                    Title:   CFO
                                          --------------------------------------

                                    SUNTRUST BANK


                                    By:      /s/ William H. Crawford
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                    Title:   Director, SunTrust Bank
                                          --------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | ________________________________                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                  M. Kotek                                        |
| Title: | Chief                  Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | September                  5, 2007                                       |
Case No. 13,641.

#### SUTHERLAND v. KELLOGG.

[The case reported under above title in 3 Chi. Leg. News, 73, and 12 Int. Rev. Rec. 211, is the same as Case No. 13,636.]
No. P67/422.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 65/9276 (New York).

Eao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of brewmasters with cords the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Silvine Importers, Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 362, C.D. 2821), the protest was dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge to determine the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law. (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d).)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris E. Perkins, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Per-Se Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information
contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                        By: /s/ CHRIS E. PERKINS
                            -----------------------------------------------
                            Chris E. Perkins
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 4, 2005












                                        3
Exhibit 10.1.1

AMENDMENT TO THE  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM A. SANGER

WHEREAS, EMSC, Inc. ("Purchaser") and William A. Sanger ("Executive") entered into an Employment Agreement ("Agreement") on
December 6, 2004, as amended; and

WHEREAS,
the Purchaser and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect compliance with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended effective January 1, 2009 as follows:

1.     The
third sentence of Section 6(a)(i) is deleted and replaced with the following:



2.     Section 6(a)(iii)
is deleted and replaced with the following:



3.     The
following language is added to the end of Section 6(a):



---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Purchaser and Executive have executed this Agreement, in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, this 30th day of December, 2008 and effective
January 1, 2009.

PURCHASER

ATTEST:By:

/s/ Todd G. Zimmerman

By:Its:

Executive Vice President

Its:




EXECUTIVE/s/ William A. SangerPrint:

William A. Sanger


---



QuickLinks
No. 57825.

protest 211992-K (New York).

#### Aero Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Prom an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything- to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 10.25
 FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
REVOLVING PROMISSORY NOTE
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING PROMISSORY NOTE, Amendment Original
Note Maker CCU
 Recitals
 SECTION 1. Definitions Note
 SECTION 2. Amendments
 2.1.
 2.2. Contract Rate
 Contract Rate
 2.3. Refinancing Notes
 Refinancing Notes CCWH Series A Notes CCWH Series B Notes CCWH Notes CCWH




---



##### 



SECTION 3. Representations and Warranties
 SECTION 4. Continuing Effect of Original Note
 SECTION 5. Governing Law
 SECTION 6. Successors and Assigns
 SECTION 7. Counterparts
 [Remainder of Page Left Intentionally Blank]
 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 MAKER:Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc./s/ Randall T. MaysName: Randall T. MaysTitle: Chief Financial OfficerPAYEE:Clear Channel Communications, Inc./s/ Brian ColemanName: Brian ColemanTitle: Senior Vice President and
Treasurer
 First Amendment to Due To CCU Revolving Promissory Note
No. 62910.

#### Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 329672-K (Galveston).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon envelopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62051, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
April 18, 1957

No. 60672.

#### United Sales Company *v.*United States,

protests 270905-K/7328, etc.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**











**AMERICAN
      TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Durkin, III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:








(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





Date:
            *August 10, 2007*By:
            /s/ *Thomas E. Durkin, III**Thomas E. Durkin, III**PRESIDENT*
(Reap. Dec. 10857)

#### Sibley Lindsay & Curr Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 685, etc.

(Decided November 18, 1964)

*Jerry JGambino*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise, consisting of cashmere outerwear, manufactured by firms shown in Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, involved in the reappraisement appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is such or similar, and the issues are in all material respects the same as the merchandise and issues in Charles Stockheimer, et al. v. United States, etc., 44 C.C.P.A. *483(Customs) 92, C.A.D. 642, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

> That there was no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as defined in Section 402 (c), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the involved merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> That the cost of production, as defined in Section 402(f) of said Act, is the proper basis for appraisement of the involved merchandise, and that such cost of production for each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is as stated in said Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part of this stipulation, for the merchandise exported during the specified periods.

> That the appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise on the invoices involved in said Schedule “A” for which no value is shown in Schedule “A”.

> That the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value for each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals, listed in said schedule “A,” during the periods specified therein, is as stated in said schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part of this decision.

As to all other merchandise, for which no values are shown in said schedule “A,” the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          52,585
<SECURITIES>                                    26,973
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,284
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,539
<PP&E>                                          22,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,835
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,935
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (852)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,990)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,320)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,670)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,670)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        


</TABLE>
No. 57553.

#### Pacific Mills, Worsted Division *v.*United States,

protests 203682-K, etc. (Boston).

*270Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content T. D. 53159” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30,
2009 of Provision Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curt Thornton, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      November 12, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Curt
      ThorntonChief
      Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board,
              President
      and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
# L_2023128DE.01008901.xml

| 15.5.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 128/89 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 128/89

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie (EU) 2022/2561 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. Dezember 2022 über die Grundqualifikation und Weiterbildung der Fahrer bestimmter Kraftfahrzeuge für den Güter oder Personenkraftverkehr (kodifizierter Text)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 330 vom 23. Dezember 2022
  )

Seite 66, Anhang II Absatz 6 Schaubild „Seite 2“

Anstatt:

„

  Image 1

  “

muss es heißen:

„

  Image 2

  “

---