alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(a)/RULE 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, Kenneth M. Clinebell,
certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. [Not applicable]

c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                    |  |                                
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2006 |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Clinebell       
|                    |  | Kenneth M. Clinebell           
|                    |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer
---

|Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  2667 CAMINO DEL RIO S. PLAZA B 
      SAN DIEGO   CALIFORNIA 92108    
|  TELEPHONE (858)722-5953   FAX
      (858) 761-0341   FAX (858) 764-5480
|
      E-MAILchanggpark@gmail.com                                         

October 13, 2010

To Whom It May Concern:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements on Form 10-K of Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. of our
report dated on October 13, 2010, with respect to the audited consolidated
financial statements of Sky Harvest Windpower Corp., included in Form 10-K for
the year ended May 31, 2010.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Chang G. Park___________________Chang G.
Park, CPA

Member of the California Society of Certified Public
Accountants Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 439 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 439

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                Correcting the enrollment of H.R. 2614.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 439

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2614) to amend the Small 
Business Investment Act to make improvements to the certified 
development company program, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 1, insert before ``are hereby enacted into 
        law'' the following: ``, as modified in accordance with section 
        3,''.
            (2) In section 2, insert before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, modified in accordance with section 3''.
            (3) Add at the end the following new section:

SEC. 3. MODIFICATION TO TEXT OF BILL ENACTED BY REFERENCE.

    The modification referred to in sections 1 and 2 is to the text of 
the bill H.R. 5538, as referred to in section 1(1), and is as follows: 
the quoted matter in the amendment proposed to be made by section 2 of 
such bill is modified by striking ``June 30, 2000'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
                      SHOPKO STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                EXHIBIT 12 - STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                           
                                                              FIRST HALF AS OF                   FISCAL YEARS ENDED
                                                       ======================================================================
                                                          AUGUST 1,        AUGUST 2,          JANUARY 31,        FEBRUARY 1,
                                                           1998              1997               1998                1997
                                                        (26 WEEKS)         (26 WEEKS)        (52 WEEKS)          (52 WEEKS)
                                                       ======================================================================
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>               <C>                  <C>

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                
==================================
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS

1    Pretax Income                                    $    13,259      $  13,292           $    81,326         $    75,215
2    Add previously capitalized interest
       amortized during the period                            278            277                   550                 548
3    Less interest capitalized during
       the period                                              17              0                     0                 128
                                                      -----------      ---------           -----------         -----------
4    Total earnings (sum of lines 1 to 3)                  13,520         13,569                81,876              75,635

     COMPUTATION OF FIXED CHARGES

5    Interest (1)                                          18,312         15,172                32,239              32,128
6    Interest factor in rental expense                      2,175          1,369                 2,691               2,657
                                                      -----------      ---------           -----------         -----------
7    Total fixed charges (sum of lines
       5 and 6)                                            20,487         16,541                34,930              34,785

8    TOTAL EARNINGS AND
       FIXED CHARGES (LINE 4
       PLUS LINE 7)                                   $    34,007      $  30,110           $   116,806         $   110,420
                                                      ===========      =========           ===========         ===========
9    Ratio (line 8 divided by line 7)                         1.7            1.8                   3.3                 3.2
</TABLE>

    (1) Includes capitalized interest



                                       31
(Reap. Dec. 11107)

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1970, etc.

*703(Decided November 24, 1965)

*Sharretts, Paley <£ Carter*for tbe plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement, enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision herein, present the question ,of the proper dutiable value of certain galvanized wire and galvanized cable twist, imported from Belgium into the port of New Orleans.

The parties hereto have submitted said appeals for decision upon the following stipulation of fact:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe' parties hereto that tbe merchandise consists of galvanized wire and galvanized cable twist exported from Belgium during the year 1959; that said merchandise is not on the list of products published in T.D. 54521 from which the application of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 97 — 84th Congress, Second Session) is withheld; that the issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban*v. *United States,*52 CCPA (Cust.), C.A.D. 851 and that the record in said case be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing appraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or in the absence of sales offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice unit values net packed exclusive of inland freight and f.o.b. charges.

Upon the agreed facts of record and following the cited authority, the court finds and holds that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and galvanized cable twist in issue and that said value is the invoice unit values, net packed, exclusive of inland freight and f.o.b. charges.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# Official Journal L 132/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.132.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 132 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5329 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.132.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 132

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5329 May 2010

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 437/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of housing interventions in favour of marginalised communities | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 438/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals | 3 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 439/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 establishing a European Asylum Support Office | 11 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 437/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of housing interventions in favour of marginalised communities

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 438/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals

3

*

Regulation (EU) No 439/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 establishing a European Asylum Support Office

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
BefoRe Judge Donlon,

December 28, 1966

No. R66/61.

No. R66/62.

No. R66/63.

No. R66/64.

No. R66/65.

No. R66/66.

No. R66/67.

No. R66/68.

No. R66/69.

#### International Packers, Limited *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/19967, etc. (New Orleans). Cap Sales Corporation *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/20060, etc. (Seattle). Wilson *&*Co. et al. *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/20871, etc. (Philadelphia). Cap Sales Corporation *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/22829, etc. (Boston). Humphrey & Macgregor, Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/1535, etc. (Tampa). International Packers, Limited *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/2785, etc. (San Francisco). Cap Sales Corporation *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/3970, etc. (Charleston). Cap Sales Corporation *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/6185, etc. (New Orleans). Cap Sales Corporation *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/9022, etc. (New Orleans).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the canned meat exported from Argentina, during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1959, described on the invoices of the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and as stated in each entry and recited in said schedule “B,” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the canned meat covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” which with schedule “B,” was attached to and made a part of the decisions.
No. 59382.

protest 248594-K (New York).

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items in question are, in fact, parts of machines, not specially provided for, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2015

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2015

151006

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 151006

COA: 324622

Oakland CC: 2014

- 141232

- AR

JAMES ARTHUR LAICH,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted.
<PAGE>   1
                              THE DIAL CORPORATION
                EXHIBIT 11 -- COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (000 omitted, except for per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  1997             1996
                                               ----------       ----------
<S>                                             <C>              <C>
BASIC:

Net income                                       $83,710           $29,912
                                                 =======           =======
Weighted average shares outstanding               91,918            89,705
                                                 =======           =======
Net income per share -- basic                    $  0.91           $  0.33
                                                 =======           =======
DILUTED:

Net income                                       $83,710           $29,912
                                                 =======           =======
Weighted average shares outstanding               91,918            89,705
  Equivalent shares from stock options             2,231             1,269
                                                 -------           -------
Weighted average common and equivalent
  shares outstanding                              94,149            90,974
                                                 =======           =======
Net income per share -- diluted                  $  0.89           $  0.33
                                                 =======           =======
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 370 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 370

Calling upon the Government of Turkey to withdraw its armed forces from 
  the island of Cyprus and to negotiate for the reunification of the 
                          Republic of Cyprus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2000

 Mr. Campbell submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Calling upon the Government of Turkey to withdraw its armed forces from 
  the island of Cyprus and to negotiate for the reunification of the 
                          Republic of Cyprus.

Whereas in 1974, Turkey sent armed forces to Cyprus and occupied over 36 percent 
        of the island, creating the widespread displacement of Greek Cypriots 
        from the northern part of the island;
Whereas since 1974, efforts by the United States and the United Nations to 
        resolve this dispute remain unsuccessful;
Whereas the European Union has commenced accession negotiations with the 
        Government of Cyprus and concluded, at its December 1999 Helsinki 
        European Council meeting, that, while a political settlement of this 
        dispute would facilitate the accession of Cyprus to the European Union, 
        it would not be a precondition for accession;
Whereas accession to the European Union would allow a united Cyprus to take full 
        advantage of European Union membership; and
Whereas more than 30,000 Turkish armed forces remain stationed on the island of 
        Cyprus: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that Turkey should--
            (1) withdraw all its armed forces from the island of 
        Cyprus; and
            (2) negotiate for the reunification of the Republic of 
        Cyprus on the basis of existing United Nations Security Council 
        resolutions.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Evan J. Griffith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
                  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
                  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  May 14, 2004

                                                     /s/ Evan J. Griffith
                                                     Evan J. Griffith
                                                     Chief Executive Officer