alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: NOVEl\1BER 7 2012 

### ,

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0485
IN THE MATTER OF 

### SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS

### No. FAA-2011-0486 2HfZ 

## ... 82

IN THE MATTER OF 

### SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKET No. CPllSWOOOO (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0680 and -0779
. 

### ORDER SETTING OUT BRIEFING SCHEDULE The parties have agreed on the following Post Hearing Briefing Schedule, which is hereby established: · 1. The Post-Hearing BriefofComplainant Federal Aviation Administration shall be filed on or before December 3, 2012; 2. The Post-Hearing BriefofRespondent SkyWest Airlinesshall be filed on or before January 3, 2013; and ·
' 3. The Rebuttal Briefofthe Federal Aviation Administration, ifany,**sh~ll** be filed on orbefore January 18, 2013.

# ~('~~!CJ< Richard C. Goodwin ' · · U.S. Administrative Law Judge

. Attachment- Service List3

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 ·wilburWright Building-. Suite 2Wl000 1 ONE COPY 

### Todd C. Emerson, 

### Respondent's Representative Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Michael L. 

### Dworkin, 

### Respondent's Counsel 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, ·CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-0250 FAX: 415-421-2560 Jeffrey M. Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office oftheRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227.-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 FDMS Nos. FAA-2011-0485 & 

### FAA-2011-0486, 0779, 0680
. (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. Forservice in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ·4


### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 

### New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

### Washington, DC 20590 

### TEL: 202-366-2139 

### Attorney-Advisor ·202-36q-5121 

### StaffAssistant FAJ(: 202-366-7536



# .......**----------------~,----~--~~-**
HOW THE THREE LITTLE PIGS 

COULD HAVE SAVED THEIR HOMES

On a windy day in Piggyville, word spread throughout the town that the Big Bad Wolf 

was visiting for his next meal. The Three Little Pigs each ran to their houses and were 

worried about the Big Bad Wolf coming to their doors. The wolf was very powerful, and 

with one strong blow he could knock down their homes and catch them!

The first little pig made his house out of sticks. He knew the Big Bad Wolf liked to visit 

Piggyville, but he used sticks anyway. He didn’t know what to use instead to protect himself. 

Sure enough, the Big Bad Wolf came knocking on his door. “Let me in!” said the wolf. When 

the first little pig said no, the wolf huffed, and he puffed and he blew the house of sticks 

down! The little pig scurried away to his sister’s house before the wolf could catch him.

The second little pig made her house of straw. While she knew straw was not 

the best material to protect herself against the Big Bad Wolf, she did not 

know what else to use. Sure enough, the Big Bad Wolf came knocking on her 

door. “Let me in!” said the wolf. When the two little pigs said no, the wolf 

huffed, and he puffed and he blew the house of straw down! The little pigs 

scurried away to their brother’s house before the wolf could catch them.

The third little pig made his house of bricks. He lived in the town next to Piggyville. The mayor of the town told the third little pig that 

everyone in this town makes their houses out of bricks to protect themselves from the Big Bad Wolf. The mayor said it was called a 

Building Code, and it was for everyone’s safety. Sure enough, the Big Bad Wolf came knocking on his door. “Let me in!” cried the 

wolf. When the three little pigs said no, the wolf huffed, and he puffed, but he could not blow the house of bricks down! They were 

safe! “Thank goodness your town had a Building Code,” said the two little pigs to their brother. “Or else we could’ve been lunch!”
How the Three Little Pigs Could Have Saved their Homes

ACTIVITY SHEET

Spot the Difference!

Spot six differences in the two images below!

Help the little pig escape the Big Bad Wolf to get 

building supplies to build a stronger home!

Word Scramble

Unscramble the letters to reveal the word!

ODWO

SATRW

BICRK

GPI

WLFO

BLUINDIG

HUSOE

CDOE
Officer's
        Certificate
 
 BSABS
        2005-HE7, BSABS 2005-HE8, BSABS 2005-HE9
 
 I,
        Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President of EMC Mortgage Corporation, do hereby
        certify to the designated Master Servicer that in respect to the period ending
        November 30, 2005, a review of the activities of EMC Mortgage Corporation
        ("EMC") during the preceding fiscal year or applicable portion thereof and
        it's
        performance under the above referenced Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
        been
        made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
        EMC has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement throughout
        such
        year, or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such obligation,
        specifying each such default known to such Servicing Officer and the nature
        and
        status thereof except for such defaults as such officer in
        its
        good faith judgment believe to be immaterial .
 
 /s/
        Sue Stepanek
 Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President
 
 2/14 /06
 Date
 
 
 
 
 
 Two
                  MacArthur Ridge 909 Hidden Ridge Drive, Suite 200 Irving, Texas
                  75038Mailing
                  Address: P.O. Box 141358, Irving, Texas
                  75014-1358
Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Dyck, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By:                |  | /s/ David A. Dyck                                
|                   |  | David A. Dyck                                    
|                   |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                  
|September 18, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23601]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-891 (Fourth Review)]


Foundry Coke From China; Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on foundry coke 
from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Randolph J. Stayin not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on April 3, 2023 (88 FR 
19674) and determined on July 7, 2023 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (88 FR 58617, August 28, 2023).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on October 20, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5468 (October 2023), 
entitled Foundry Coke from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-891 (Fourth 
Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 20, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-23601 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>   1
                                  [Letterhead of AVITAS]

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

December 16, 1998


America West Airlines, Inc.
51 West Third Street
Tempe, AZ  85281


Re:      America West Airlines, Inc.
         Pass Through Certificates, Series 1998-1


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We consent to the reference to our name in the text under the headings
"Risk Factors - Risk Factors Relating to the Certificates and the Exchange Offer
- Possible Effects if Aircraft Appraisals do not Correspond to the Realizable
Value of Aircraft," "Description of the Aircraft and the Appraisals - The
Appraisals", "Experts" and "Appendix II - Appraisal Letters" in the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We also consent to the inclusion in the Registration Statement of the report
prepared by us with respect to the Aircraft referred to therein.


Sincerely,

/s/ Noel Petrie
--------------------------
Noel Petrie
Manager -- Asset Valuation
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated July 28



 Exhibit 4.5 
  

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 
 OF

 RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 OF 
 V.I. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
  
 It is hereby certified that: 
  
 1. The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) is V.I. Technologies, Inc. 
  
 2. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended to date, is hereby further amended by striking out the first
paragraph of Article FOURTH in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 
  
 “FOURTH. The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is seventy-six million (76,000,000) shares, of which seventy-five million (75,000,000) shares will be shares of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), and one million (1,000,000) shares shall be shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per shares (the “Preferred Stock”).” 
  
 3. The foregoing amendment was adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 
  
 4. This Certificate of Amendment
shall become effective at 5:00 p.m., local time, on July 28, 2003. 
  
 Signed this
25th day of July 2003. 
  

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    THOMAS T.
HIGGINS    


	 Name:
	 	Thomas T. Higgins
	 Title:
	 	 Executive Vice President, Operations, Chief
 Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(function ($, Drupal) {

  Drupal.behaviors.dynamic_home = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {

    var langCode = drupalSettings.path.currentLanguage;

    //override of core/misc/autocomplete.js to allow commas
    Drupal.autocomplete.splitValues = function autocompleteSplitValues(value) {
      var result = [];
      var quote = false;
      var current = '';
      var valueLength = value.length;
      var character = void 0;

      for (var i = 0; i < valueLength; i++) {
        character = value.charAt(i);
        if (character === '"') {
          current += character;
          quote = !quote;
        } else {
          current += character;
        }
      }

      if (value.length > 0) {
        result.push($.trim(current));
      }

      return result;
    }

      jQuery( "#edit-dhlocation" ).focus(function() {
        if (jQuery('#edit-dhlocation').val() == 'Enter your city and state, or ZIP code') {
          jQuery( "#edit-dhlocation" ).val("");
        }
        if (jQuery('#edit-dhlocation').val() == 'Ingrese su ciudad y estado, o código postal') {
          jQuery( "#edit-dhlocation" ).val("");
        }
      });

      jQuery( "#edit-dhlocation" ).focusout(function() {
        if (jQuery('#edit-dhlocation').val() == '') {
          if (langCode == 'es') {
            jQuery( "#edit-dhlocation" ).val("Ingrese su ciudad y estado, o código postal");
          } else {
            jQuery( "#edit-dhlocation" ).val("Enter your city and state, or ZIP code");
          }
        }
      });
    }
  }
})(jQuery, Drupal);
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                              THE FINOVA GROUP INC.
            COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                          AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                             (Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    1998        1997        1996        1995        1994
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>     
Income from continuing operations before
  income taxes                                    $282,009    $226,178    $185,822    $150,834    $122,863

Add fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                 479,360     416,093     366,543     337,814     210,001

  One-third of rent expense                          3,854       2,789       2,368       2,084       2,053
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges                                483,214     418,882     368,911     339,898     212,054
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Income as adjusted                                $765,223    $645,060    $554,733    $490,732    $334,917
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ratio of income to fixed charges                      1.58        1.54        1.50        1.44        1.58
==========================================================================================================

Preferred stock dividends on a pre-tax basis      $  6,325    $  6,676

Total combined fixed charges and
    preferred stock dividends                     $489,539    $425,558    $368,911    $339,898    $212,054
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ratio of income to combined fixed charges
    and preferred stock dividends                     1.56        1.52        1.50        1.44        1.58
==========================================================================================================
</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

November 1, 1956

No. 60324.

protests 191249-K, etc. (New York).

#### Morganite, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carbon powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Morganite, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 C. C. P. A. 207, C. A. D. 595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# L_2022328EN.01017001.xml

| 22.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/170 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/170

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2022/2353 of 1 December 2022 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to strengthen the capacities of the Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 311 of 2 December 2022
  )

The title on the contents page and the title on page 149:

for:

‘Council Decision (EU) 2022/2353 ...’,

read:

‘Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2353 ...’.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Wallowa-Whitman National Forestinvasive plants treatment project [electronic resource] : draft environmentalimpact statement : Wallowa, Union, Baker, Malheur, Umatilla, and Grant countiesin Oregon, Adams and Nez Perce counties in Idaho.**
 
Volumes: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.92/2:W 15/6
Item Number:0080-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000655403
 
January 8, 2020
Before the Second Division,

November 8, 1967

No. P67/393.

#### Mego Corp. *v.*United States, protest 66/72707 (New York).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), except that the component material of chief value of the merchandise herein is steel, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
BepoRe Chief Judge Bao,

September 19, 1966

No. R66/32.

#### Shalom Baby Wear, Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R62/2526, etc. (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the facts and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Shalom Baby-Wear, Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 526, Reap. Dec. 10905), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the cotton T shirts, cotton parkas, and other cotton wearing apparel in issue and that such value was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report),
I, Simon Pedder, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



/S/    SIMON
PEDDERSimon PedderPresident and Chief Executive Officer


March 10, 2010
No. 62909.

#### Wall Trends, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/8341 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-98026, 33-98566, 33-98568 and 333-16891) on Forms S-8 of SpeedFam
International, Inc. of our reports dated June 26, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of SpeedFam International, Inc. and consolidated
subsidiaries as of May 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended May 31, 1998, and related schedule, and the
consolidated balance sheets of SpeedFam Co., Ltd. and subsidiaries as of April
30, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended April 30, 1998, which reports appear in the 1998 annual report on
Form 10-K of SpeedFam International, Inc.
 
                                          KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
August 24, 1998
Chicago, Illinois
(Reap. Dec. 10584)

#### Dalminter, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5523 H.

(Decided September 10, 1963)

*Shan-etts, Foley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*John*IF. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain seamless steel casing or seamless steel tubing, exported from Italy and entered at the port of Houston, Tex.

In a stipulation of submission, the parties have agreed that the facts and the law controlling appraisement of the present merchandise are the same in all material respects as the factual and legal condition that applied in *United States*v. *Dalminter, Inc., et al.,*47 Cust. Ct. 577, A.R.D. 135, the record in which case was incorporated herein by consent.

Consistent with the cited case, I find that the proper basis for ap-praisement of the present merchandise is United States value, as de*373fined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and hold that such statutory value for the items in question is the prices set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, less 2 per centum cash discount, less 6.604 per centum for general expenses and 5.895 per centum for profit, less ocean freight of $15 per metric ton, less inland freight of $6 per metric ton, less $2.50 per metric ton for stowage, less duty 7% per centum, plus 4 per centum on casing grade N-80 or 12% per centum on tubing grade J-55.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53365.

protests 100039-K, etc. (New York).

#### Munson G. Shaw Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.