alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*1650
                Tyson Blvd. Suite 1600**McLean,
                VA 22102*February
                28, 2006*Tel
                703.714.8000**Fax
                703.714.8100*LaSalle
                Bank National AssociationATTN:
                Corporate Trust Services, JPMCC 2005-CIBC12135South
                LaSalle Street, Suite 1625Chicago,
                IL 60603


RE: J.P.
      Morgan
      Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
      Certificates Series
      2005-CIBC12 (the " Certificates ")




This
      Officer's Certificate and Annual Statement as to Compliance is furnished to
      you
      pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
      "Agreement"), dated as of July 1, 2005, among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
      Securities Corp., as Depositor, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as
      Servicer, J.E. Robert Company,
      Inc., as Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee.
      All terms used herein shall have
      the
      meaning set forth tor such terms in the Agreement.




The
      undersigned Special Servicer Officer, on behalf of J.E. Robert Company, Inc.,
      hereby certifies:




(i)
      a
      review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the calendar year 2005
      (or, if applicable, the portion of such
      year
      during which the Certificates were outstanding) and of its performance under
      this Agreement has been made
      under such officer's supervision;




(ii)
      to
      the best of such officer's knowledge, based on said review, the Special Servicer
      has fulfilled all of its obligations
      under this Agreement in all material respects throughout said year (or, if
      applicable, the portion of such year during which the Certificates were
      outstanding): and,




(iii)  the
      Special Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging
      the status, of the Lower-Tier REMIC
      or
      the Upper-Tier REMIC as a REMIC under the REMIC Provisions from ihe Internal
      Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.




J.E.
      ROBERT COMPANY, INC.







By: /s/ Debra H. Morgan
              By:
                /s/ Michael F. CocanougherDebra H. Morgan
              Michael
                F. CocanougherVice President
              Director
                of Special ServicingSpecial Servicer Officer
              Special
                Servicing Officer
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memor andum Opinion filed

September 22 , 2015.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00760

- CR , 14

- 15

- 00761

- CR , and 14

- 15

- 00762

- CR

IN RE JEFFERY ALAN H ARBERSON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 15CR0015 , 15CR0526, and 15CR0527



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 8, 2015, relator Jeffery Alan Harberson filed a pro se petition
for writ of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable John Ellisor, presiding judge of the 122nd District Court of Galveston County , to proceed to trial in Trial Court Cause Nos. 15CR0015 , 15CR0526, and 15CR0527

.2

The Galveston County records show that the trial court has appointed
counsel to represent relator in these matters. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation and a trial court’ s decision not to rule on a pro s e motion in
this situation is not subject to review. Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).
Relator asserts in his petition that the trial court has not ruled on his p ro se motion for a speedy trial. This issue relate s directly to criminal proceeding s in
which relator is represented by counsel. Therefore, relator has not shown that the trial court has a legal duty to rule on his pro se motion and the trial court’s fai lure to rule is not subject to review by this court

. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus

.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Boyce , Busby, and Brown

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         3511313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    64722
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3576035
<PP&E>                                        23483019
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                27484384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           106256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    27375323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  27484384
<SALES>                                        3119357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3318504
<CGS>                                          1600379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    58505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                114051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1545569
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1545569
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1545569
<EPS-BASIC>                                      47.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    47.77


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10886)

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 13204, etc.

(Decided January 27, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

Tbe appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (See. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase *490prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In. all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Volume 1 | January 2020

January 2020 Highlights

The FERC insight gives you a monthly snapshot of FERC news – you get the latest news from the monthly Commission meeting and

schedules for upcoming conferences and Commissioners’ speeches/presentations, as well as links to Commission orders, notices

and new reports.

Notice of Commission Meeting

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission announces a Commission meeting for 10 a.m.

January 30, 2020.

Sunshine Notice

McNamee will not seek another term at FERC

At the January Commission meeting, Commissioner McNamee announced he will not seek another

term at FERC though Commissioner McNamee has said he will remain at the Commission until a

successor is sworn in.

Statement

FERC Announces Workshop

FERC To Convene a Workshop on Data Collection for Analytics and Surveillance and MarketBased Rate Purposes on February 27, 2020.

Notice | Event Details

Technical Conference Rescheduled

FERC will Convene a Technical Conference regarding Revisions to the Filing Process for

Commission Forms on March 24-26, 2020 (Originally scheduled February 4-6,2020) 

Notice  | Notice of Rescheduling  | Event Details

Staff Issues Infrastructure Report

FERC Staff Issues Energy Infrastructure Update for November 2019. 

Report | FERC Staff Reports

A Look Ahead January 28, 2020 – Annual State of the Industry, Commodity Markets Council, Chairman

Neil Chatterjee will be speaking, Washington, DC

January 30, 2020 – Commission Meeting

February 9 – 12, 2020 – NARUC, Chairman Neil Chatterjee and Commissioner Bernard

McNamee will be speaking, Washington, DC

February 12, 2020 – Energy Storage Association Energy Policy Forum, Commissioner

Richard Glick will be speaking, Washington, DC

February 19, 2020 – American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) Webinar,

Chairman Neil Chatterjee will be speaking, Webcast
February 19, 2020 – Cloud for Utilities Summit, Chairman Neil Chatterjee will be 

speaking, Washington, DC

February 20, 2020 – Commission Meeting

February 21, 2020 – Western Power Trading Forum, Commissioner McNamee will be

speaking, Carlsbad, CA

FERC is Best Place to Work

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was presented the award for the “Best Place

to Work” among mid-sized federal agencies for 2019.

Instagram | Twitter

Decisions & Notices Delegated Orders & Notices | Notational Orders

Chairman and Commissioners at the January 2020 meeting.

Highlights & Happenings
Befoee Judge Donlon,

January 16, 1967

No. R67/10.

No. R67/11.

No. R67/12.

#### Cap Sales Corporation *v.*United States,

reappraisement R61/5771 (Los Angeles).

#### Wilson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R61/7100 (New York).

#### Wilson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R61/9909 (New Orleans).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the canned meat exported from Argentina, during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1959, and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and as stated in each entry and recited in said schedule “B,” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the canned meat covered by the appeals for reappraisement, said schedule “B,” being attached to and made a part of the decisions.
Exhibit 99.9



LOGO



| |  |                                 |  |             |  |                |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | -------------- |  | 
| |  | KPMG LLP                        |  | Telephone   |  | (403) 691-8000 |  | 
| |  | 205 - 5th Avenue SW             |  | Fax         |  | (403) 691-8008 |  | 
| |  | Suite 3100, Bow Valley Square 2 |  | www.kpmg.ca |  |               
| |  | Calgary AB                      |  |             |  |                |  | 
| |  | T2P 4B9                         |  |             |  |                |  | 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Penn West Petroleum Ltd.

We
consent to the use of our reports, each dated September 17, 2014, with respect to the restated consolidated financial statements and the restated effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in this amended annual report
on Form 40-F.

Our report dated September 17, 2014, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,
expresses our opinion that Penn West Petroleum Ltd. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 because of the effect of material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control
criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Companys former senior accounting management did not maintain an effective control environment; the Company did not maintain effective controls to prevent or detect the
circumvention or override of controls; and the Company did not maintain appropriate controls over the recording of journal entries.

We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of such reports in the registration statement (No. 333-171675) on Form F-3 of Penn West Petroleum Ltd.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP         
|                     
|Chartered Accountants
|                     
|Calgary, Canada      
|September 17, 2014   



| |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |  | 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG
International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. 
KPMG Confidential |  |
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended July 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/ THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
ICYMI -- FEMA ADMINISTRATOR CALLS FOR COLLABORATION IN BUILDING A
RESILIENT NATION AT NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
CONFERENCE
[https://www.fema.gov/press-release/20240318/icymi-fema-administrator-calls-collaboration-building-resilient-nation]


Release Date: 
March 18, 2024 

WASHINGTON – Yesterday, FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell addressed
the nation’s emergency managers at the National Emergency Management
Association (NEMA)’s 2024 Mid-Year Forum in Washington, D.C. In her
speech, she celebrated NEMA’s 50th anniversary and the long-standing
partnership between the emergency management organizations. As the
role of emergency managers continues to shift to meet changing needs
of the nation, Administrator Criswell called for resilience-focused
collaboration to find ways to “equitably deliver our resources to
communities before they need them.”

From the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979 to the COVID-19
pandemic, the field of emergency management has evolved through the
decades. Emergency managers are called upon to respond to more and
more incidents and a variety of natural and man-made hazards. The
profession is no longer expected to just pick up the pieces; emergency
mangers are expected to be there before, during and after disaster
strikes. 

“You, the state emergency managers are on the frontline!” said
Administrator Criswell. “If we’re going to prepare our communities
for a future driven by climate change, then we need to invest in
hazard mitigation before a disaster even strikes. This is our “Year
of Resilience.” And we want to be your partners in this critical
work, because you are the backbone of emergency management. As state
directors, you know your communities best -- you’re ready to do what
it takes to keep people safe.” 

Communities across the nation have been, and continue to be, tested by
natural hazards and adversaries looking to do harm. Amidst these
challenges, there are stories of how thoughtful planning helped a
family, a neighborhood or a community. Administrator Criswell
underscored the critical importance of fostering robust partnerships
to leverage resources, share best practices and break down barriers in
order to enhance resilience and safeguard communities nationwide. 

Read Administrator Criswell’s full speech at Administrator
Criswell's Remarks at the National Emergency Management Association
2024 Mid-Year Forum
[https://www.fema.gov/fact-sheet/administrator-criswells-remarks-national-emergency-management-association-2024-mid-year].
No. 68596.

protests 60/27658, etc. (New York).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lawn sprinklers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 7,748.

#### In re KEYSER.

[9 Ben. 224.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct., 1877.

Bankruptcy— Pb'Oof op Debt — Attorney por Bankrupt.

A proof of debt taken before a notary public who is the attorney and solicitor of record for the bankrupt will not be allowed to be filed.

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict, Esq., arid Benj. Lincoln Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

This was a certificate from- the register, raising the question whether a proof of debt taken before a notary public who was the attorney and solicitor of record for the bankrupt [John H. Keyser] in this matter ought to be received. The register certified that, in his opinion, it was against the principles of the bankrupt law and against good custom to allow an attorney for the bankrupt to appear in any other capacity and that the proof in question should not be filed.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

I concur in the conclusion of the register, that the proof ought not to be filed.
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 AMENDMENT NO. 10
TO THE
STEWART ENTERPRISES EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT TRUST
(A PROFIT SHARING PLAN) TRUST AGREEMENT
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE,
  Benefits for 2005 Hurricane Victims
  (i)
    
    A 2005 Hurricane Victim is a Participant who suffered
an economic loss as a result of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita or Wilma, who
remains employed by the Employer, and who was residing: (1) in the
Hurricane Katrina Disaster Area as of August 28, 2005; (2) in the
Hurricane Rita Disaster Area as of September 23, 2005; or (3) in the
Hurricane Wilma Disaster Area as of October 23, 2005.(ii)
    
    Hurricane Katrina Disaster Area means an area with
respect to which a major disaster has been declared by the President
before September 14, 2005, under Section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), by
reason of Hurricane Katrina.(iii)
    
    Hurricane Rita Disaster Area means an area with
respect to which a major disaster has been declared by the President
before October 6, 2005, under section 401 of the Stafford Act, by
reason of Hurricane Rita.(iv)
    
    Hurricane Wilma Disaster Area means an area with
respect to which a major disaster has been declared by the President
before




---



##### 



November 14, 2005, under section 401 of the Stafford Act, by
reason of Hurricane Wilma.
      IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 WITNESSES:
    
    
    
    STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC./s/ KATHY RICHESON
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ GERARD M. BELLOCQGerard M. BellocqStewart Enterprises EmployeesRetirement TrustAdministrative and Investment Committee/s/ TERRY DELANCY
No. 62380.

#### Wool Distributing Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 329908-K (Boston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that one bale of greasy wool, No. 38, weighing 255 pounds gross, was not landed in the United States, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and refund all duty assessed upon said merchandise.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C §1350

 

I, Kathleen Mason, the Chief Executive Officer of Tuesday MorningCorporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.             Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tuesday Morning Corporation for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TuesdayMorning Corporation.

 
| Date: May 2, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Kathleen Mason                      |   |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Kathleen Mason  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----