Michael Sundblom Air Quality Director


### April21, 2014 Office ofthe Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld 75 Hawthorn Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 PINAL•COUNTY widt open opportunity



### Sent via Email blumenfeld.jared@epa.gov RE: AQS Data Certification Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, Greg Stanley County Manager



### This letter constitutes certification ofPinal County's SLAMS and SPM monitoring data pursuant to 40CFR 58.15. Our Annual Network Plan identifies those monitors that should be appropriately characterized as SLAMS and SPM monitors. We have entered into AQS 2013 data for all our FRM and FEM monitors. The accompanying AMP600 report summarizes the data entered for calendar year 2013. Additionally, all the available quality assurance data associated with FRM and FEM monitors has been entered into AQS. Should you have any questions please call me at (520) 866-6960. Sincerely, Michael Sundblom Air Quality Director Cc: via email: Eric Massey, ADEQ Theresa Rigney, ADEQ

AIR QUALITY CONTROL DISTRICT 31 North Pinal Street, Building F, PO Box 987 Florence, AZ 85232 T 520-866-6929 FREE 888-431-1311 F 520-866-6967 www.pinalcountyaz.govUser ID: AKY Report Request ID: 1201916 Tribal

Code PROTOCOL SELECTIONS UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CERTIFICATION EVALUATION AND CONCURRENCE Report Code: AMP600 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA

04 AGENCY SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration Pinal County APCD CRITERIA CRITERIA CRITERIA 81102 44201 88101 SELECTED OPTIONS Option Type MERGE PDF FILES

AGENCY ROLE DATE CRITERIA Start Date End Date 2013 2013 Option Value YES CERTIFYING

Selection Criteria Page 1 CSA EPA Region Apr. 21, 2014

## Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report Summary Apr. 21, 2014 

### Certification Year: 2013 

### Certifying Agency (CA): Pinal County APCD (0865) 

### Pollutants in Report: Parameter Name Ozone PM10 Total 0-10um STP PM2.5 - Local Conditions 

### PQAOs in Report: PQAO Name Pinal County APCD 

### Summary of 'N' flags for all pollutants: Parameter Monitors Monitors Recommended for Monitors NOT Recommended Code Evaluated Concurrence 

## by AQS for Concurrence 

## by AQS 44201 3 3 0 81102 15 12 3 88101 5 3 2 

### PQAO Code TSA Date 0865 04/11/12 

### AQS Cert. Agency Recommended Recommended PQAO Code AQS Site-ID POC Flag Flag Reason for AQS Recommendation 0865 81102 04-021 -3002 0865 81102 04-021-3002 0865 81102 04-021-3002 0865 81102 04-021-3011 0865 88101 04-021-3013 0865 81102 04-021-3011 0865 81102 04-021-3011 0865 88101 04-021-3002 0865 81102 04-021-3011 

### 3 3 3 

### 2 2 2 N N N N N N N N N 

### y y y y y 

### y y y Annual Summary completeness < 70% . Flow Rate Audit completeness < 65% . Flow Rate Verification completeness < 65% . Annual Summary completeness < 70% . Annual Summary completeness < 70% . Annual Summary completeness< 70%. Flow Rate Audit completeness < 65% . PQAO-Level Collocation criteria not met. Y Flow Rate Audit completeness < 65% .



# SignatureofMonitoringOrganizationRepresentat~e:

**~~ ~~~~~~~~==**  **~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~-**  (:tiPf,C/h_(te(

**~cJv'dblo'1**

**)**

Page 1 of 1

# Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants Certifying Year 2013 Certifying Agency Code Pinal County APCD (0865) Parameter Ozone (44201) (ppm) PQAO Name Pinal County APCD (0865)

**~APP** 

### Approval Date 01/03/2013

NPAP Audit Summary: Number of Valid Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 0 y Routine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag AQS POC Monitor Mean Min Max Exceed . Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa Site ID Type Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag EvaI. 04-021-3001 1 SLAMS 0.049 0.019 0.091 0 0 99 1 .52 +/-1.31 96 - 5. 15 100 y y y y 

## s 04-021-3003 1 SLAMS 0 .050 0.02 1 0.082 0 0 97 1.98 +/-1.64 96 - 3.79 100 y y y y 

## s 04-021-3007 1 SPECIAL 0 .054 0.030 0.085 0 0 90 1 .67 +/-1.51 100 - 4.56 100 y y y y 

## s PURPOSE

**~**

**~** 

# - j

# Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter Certifying Year:2013 Certifying Agency: Pinal County APCD (0865) Parameter: PM10 Total 0-10um STP (81102) CONTINUOUS PQAO Name: Pinal County APCD (0865) Quality Assurance Project Plan Approval Date: 01/03/2013 Monitors Summaries Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Verification Flow Rate Audit Concurrence Flag 

### Monitor Exceed. Outlier 

### % % % QAPP AQS RecCA Rec EPA AQS Site ID POC

**~Mean** 

### Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete Bias Complete

**~** 

### Flag Flag EvaI. 04-021-0001 3 SLAMS 37 . 16 -9.0 ******** 

### 0 99 +/-2.47 100 -0.90 100 y y y 

# s 04-021-3007 3 SPECIAL 32.63 -9.0 ******** 

### 0 97 +/-1 . 16 100 -0.42 100 y y y 

# s PURPOSE 04-021 -3008 3 SLAMS 67 .53 -9.0 

### ******* 0 98 +/-0.77 100 +0.33 100 y y y 

# s 04-021 -3009 3 SPECIAL 43.08 -9.0 ******** 

### 0 99 +/-1.83 100 +0.03 100 y y y 

# s PURPOSE 04-021 -301 0 3 SPECIAL 45 .72 -9 .0 ******** 

### 0 98 -0 .85 100 -0.30 100 y y y 

# s PURPOSE 04-021-3011 3 SPECIAL 47.45 -9.0 ******** 

### 0 97 +/-0.71 100 +0.48 100 y y y 

# s PURPOSE 04-021-3013 3 SPECIAL 95.89 -9.0 ******* 

### 0 97 +/-1.20 100 +0.06 100 y y y 

# s PURPOSE 04-021-3002 3 SPECIAL 25.50 -9.0 865 .0 0 

# r 49 

## 1 +/-1.45 50 

## 1 +1.62 50 

## 1 y 

### N 

## 1 y 

# s Submitter Comment:



## Thi~~~rft{f?&oEus monitor was shut down with EPA?s EPA Comment: I 

### concurrence on 07/01/2013. The monitor was set as a SPM in response to a filter-based exceedence on July 8, 2011. During the time of its operation only one exceedence was recorded that was not an EPA appr

# Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter Certifying Year:2013 Certifying Agency: Pinal County APCD (0865) Parameter: PM10 Total 0-10um STP (81102) INTERMITTENT PQAO Name: Pinal County APCD (0865) Quality Assurance Project Plan Approval Date: 01/03/2013 Collocation Summary # Sites 

### # Sites 

### # Sites Reg Collocated 5 1 2 

### Monitors Summaries Monitor 

### % 

## cv Collocated Est CV UB 100 8.46 9.89 Routine Data (ug/m3) 

### Exceed. Outlier Criteria Met? 

### y

% AQS Site ID POC 04-021-3002 04-021-3004 **~Mean** 

### Min Max Count Count

**Com~lete**
04-021 -3004 2 04-021-3007 04-021 -3014 04-021-3011 SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS 20.46 2.0 35.90 2 .0 42 .08 2 .0 25.18 4 .0 37 .50 5.0 33 .77 5.0 115.0 139.0 137.0 61 .0 107.0 97 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 98 86 100 Flow Rate Audit 

### % Bias

**Com~lete** -0.73 100 +1.04 100 +0.36 100 +0 .76 100 +1 .74 100 +3.28 50 ubmitter Comment: This filter-based monitor was shut down on 07/01/2013 . EPA Comment:

04-021 -3011 2

ubmitter Comment: I The continuous monitor was converted from SPM to SLAMS and all the method 062 and 063 monitors in the network were replaced with method 098 monitors . The collocation site for the method 098 monitors SLAMS 37 .30 5.0 104.0 0 0 This filter-based monitor was shut down on 07/01/2013. The continuous monitor was converted from SPM to SLAMS and all the method 062 and 063 monitors in the network were replaced with method 098 monitors. The collocation site for the method 098 monitors +4.40 50 EPA Comment: Collocation 

### % PQAO 

## cv

**Com~lete** 

### Crit. Me 13.27 83

3.50 86 

### y y y y y y

y Concurrence Flag 

### QAPP AQS Rec CA Rec EPA

**~** 

### Flag 

### y y y y y y y y y y 

## v _ .... N ........



### y N



# _ _ __, Flag 

### y y 

### y y y y

y EvaI. 

# s s s 

# s s 

# s

s

# Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter Certifying Year:2013 Certifying Agency: Pinal County APCD (0865) Parameter: PM2.5- Local Conditions (881 01) PQAO Name: Pinal County APCD (0865) Quality Assurance Project Plan Approval Date: 01/03/2013 Collocation Summary # Sites 

### # Sites Method 

### # Sites Reg Collocated

143 2 1 1 145 

### 0 

### Monitors Summaries 

# I % 

## cv Collocated Est CV UB Criteria Met? 100 6.93 7.92 

### y



### 0 J 

# I N 

### J Routine Data (ug/m3) 

### PEP Summary # # Audited 

### # PEP 

### # PEP % Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete 2 0 

### 5 0 0

Flow Rate Audit Collocation 

### PEP Bias Criteria Met?

y

Concurrence Flag 

### Monitor Exceed.Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPPAQS RecCA Rec EPA AQS Site ID POC Method

**~** 

### Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit. MetCrit. Met 

## Aim.!::. E.!l!.g E.!l!.g Eval. 04-021-0001 1 143 SLAMS 8.07 2.7 17.6 0 100 -1.16 100 7.92 100 

### y y y y y 

# s 04-021-0001 2 143 SLAMS 7.94 2 .7 18.0 0 100 -1 .83 100 

### y y y y y 

# s 04-021-3013 1 143 SLAMS 15.76 3.0 43 .6 0 98 +0.42 100 

# I y 

### J y y y y 

# s 04-021-3002 1 145 SLAMS 5 .51 .8 14 . 1 0 93 -0.89 100 

## I N 

### y y N 

## I y 

# s

**ubmitter** Comment: Pinal County currently does not have a collocated site for EPA Comment: I method 145. 103 grant money was requested to correct this deficiency and was granted. The new equipment was ordered in February, 2014 and will be deployed as soon as it arrives . 04-021-3013 2 143 SLAMS 13.91 2.7 41.8 0 

# r 47 

## 1 +0.06 100 

### y y y N 

## l y 

# s

**~ubmitter** Comment: This site has two method 098 filter-based monitors each EPA Comment: I runn ing on a 1 -in-6 schedule . The monitors are staggered to collect 1-in3 data as required by the CFR. As requested by EPA, one monitor is POC 1 and the other is POC 2 . This configuration caused t '-.

## Data Concurrence and Evaluation Report for Lead