alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10614)

#### Authentic Furniture Products *v.*United States

Entry No. 40574, etc.

(Decided October 30, 1963)

*Stein & ShostaJc*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed in the schedule attached to and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS I-IEREBT STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, manufactured by Otsubo ICogyo, consists of wall shelves and other wood furniture, and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, net packed.

> That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> *439IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement enumerated in the- attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for a decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values were the invoice unit values, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 266

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and

Pensions

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the benefits

of music education.

Whereas there is a growing body of scientific research demonstrating that children who receive music instruction

perform better on spatial-temporal reasoning tests and

proportional math problems;

Whereas music education grounded in rigorous instruction is

an important component of a well-rounded academic program;
2

HCON 266 RFS

Whereas opportunities in music and the arts have enabled

children with disabilities to participate more fully in

school and community activities;

Whereas music and the arts can motivate at-risk students to

stay in school and become active participants in the educational process;

Whereas according to the College Board, college-bound high

school seniors in 1998 who received music instruction

scored 53 points higher on the verbal portion of the

Scholastic Aptitude Test and 39 points higher on the

math portion of the test than college-bound high school

seniors with no music or arts instruction;

Whereas a 1999 report by the Texas Commission on Drug

and Alcohol Abuse states that individuals who participated in band or orchestra reported the lowest levels of

current and lifelong use of alcohol, tobacco, and illicit

drugs; and

Whereas comprehensive, sequential music instruction enhances early brain development and improves cognitive

and communicative skills, self-discipline, and creativity:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) music education enhances intellectual devel4 opment and enriches the academic environment for

5 children of all ages; and

6 (2) music educators greatly contribute to the

7 artistic, intellectual, and social development of
3

HCON 266 RFS

1 American children, and play a key role in helping

2 children to succeed in school.

Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
No. 58372.

protest 228712-K (New York).

#### Norman Thomas *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of live birds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Mazer*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1265), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald
W. Hultgren, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2008 |  | /S/ Donald W. Hultgren               
|                       |  | Donald W. Hultgren                   
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                  EXHIBIT 12(A)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       26 WEEKS
                                                         ENDED
                                                      12/30/2006                   YEAR ENDED
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)                         (UNAUDITED)     2006       2005       2004       2003
                                                      -----------   --------  ----------  ---------   -------
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>       <C>         <C>         <C>
Fixed Charges
   Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs
   on all indebtedness                                $    19,891   $ 36,968   $ 51,703   $  39,783   $40,109
   Add interest element implicit in rentals                 1,459      2,959      3,296       3,443     3,500
                                                      -----------   --------   --------   ---------   -------
      Total fixed charges                             $    21,350   $ 39,927   $ 54,999   $  43,226   $43,609

(Loss) Income

   (Loss) Income from continuing operations
      before income taxes                             $   (16,359)  $(65,805)  $(76,265)   (131,194)  $10,071
   Add fixed charges                                       21,350     39,927     54,999      43,226    43,609
                                                      -----------   --------   --------   ---------   -------
   (Loss) Income from continuing operations
       before fixed charges and income taxes          $     4,991   $(25,878)  $(21,266)  $ (87,968)  $53,680
                                                      ===========   ========   ========   =========   =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           0.23      (0.65)     (0.39)      (2.04)     1.23
</TABLE>

                                       46
No. 59324.

protests 256292-K and 258023-K (New York).

#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hot plate mats the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57261, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58356.

protests 196208-K, etc. (Galveston).

#### Lucey Products Corp. and R. W. Smith et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel A. P. I. casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C. D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# L_2022104EN.01016401.xml

| 1.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/164 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/164

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/472 of 23 March 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2022/339 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Ukrainian Armed Forces

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 96 of 24 March 2022
  )

On page 46, in Article 1, in point (5):

for:

| ‘(5) | in Article 4, paragraph 4, point (k) is replaced by the following:






  “(k) | the Ministry of Defence, the Federal Foreign Office and other governmental agencies of Germany;”.’, |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘(5)

in Article 4, paragraph 4, point (k) is replaced by the following:

“(k)

the Ministry of Defence, the Federal Foreign Office and other governmental agencies of Germany;”.’,

read:

| ‘(5) | in Article 4, paragraph 4, point (k) is replaced by the following:






  “(k) | the Ministry of Defence and the Federal Foreign Office of Germany;”.’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘(5)

in Article 4, paragraph 4, point (k) is replaced by the following:

“(k)

the Ministry of Defence and the Federal Foreign Office of Germany;”.’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          11,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,102 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,248 
<INVENTORY>                                      2,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,849
<PP&E>                                         565,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 598,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,870
<BONDS>                                        245,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                         5,793
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   598,643
<SALES>                                        461,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               461,841
<CGS>                                          293,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,994
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
US-EPA Office ofPesticide Programs Document Processing Desk Office ofPesticide Programs (7504P) Pesticide Reevaluation Division Risk Management and Implementation Branch IV Attention: Ms. Wilhelmena Livingston Chemical Review Manager - Dodine Subject: Dodine, EPA Reg. No . 55260-4, PC Code: 044301 Request to terminate the Use on Strawberries Dear Ms . Livingston: Via Courier Delivery June 22, 2015

Pursuant to om recent conversation, herewith on behalf of Agriphar S.A. , I am voluntarily requesting to terminate the use ofDodine on strawberries. It seems that the Agency's database is still listing Dodine as a registered use on strawberries including the established tolerance for residues ofdodine inion strawberries according to the Dodine tolerance list under § 180.172. The product (Technical - EPA Reg. #55260-4; and its end-use products - EPA Reg. #55260-6 and #55260-11) has not been labeled for the use on strawberries for many years . Agriphar also would like to waive the usual 180 day comment period in the Federal Register. If you have any questions or need further information concerning this submission, please do not hesitate to contact me (61 0-793-3222). Sincerely,



# ~J-frF;~ Bert Volger, Ph.D . Consultant for Agriphar S.A. Cc: C. Corman - Agriphar 1087 Heartsease Drive • West Chester, PA 19382 • 610-793-3222
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 26

To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive order that infringes

on the powers and duties of the Congress under article I, section 8

of the Constitution, or that would require the expenditure of Federal

funds not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the Executive

order, is advisory only and has no force or effect unless enacted as

law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mr. METCALF submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive

order that infringes on the powers and duties of the

Congress under article I, section 8 of the Constitution,

or that would require the expenditure of Federal funds

not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the Executive order, is advisory only and has no force or effect

unless enacted as law.

Whereas some Executive orders have infringed on the prerogatives of the Congress and resulted in the expenditure of

Federal funds not appropriated for the specific purposes

of those Executive orders: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 26 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that any

3 Executive order issued by the President before, on, or

4 after the date of the approval of this resolution that in5 fringes on the powers and duties of the Congress under

6 article I, section 8 of the Constitution, or that would re7 quire the expenditure of Federal funds not specifically ap8 propriated for the purpose of the Executive order, is advi9 sory only and has no force or effect unless enacted as law.

Æ
### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ROBERT ADAM MCGUFFEY, Appellant, vs. JAMES GREGORY COX, DIRECTOR OF N.D.O.C., Respondent. No. 70428 

# FILED JUN 2 7 2016

This appeal was docketed in this court on May 20. 2016, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K LINDEMAN BY 

# (StaiL 

# Vb‘n.ou

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge Robert Adam McGuffey Attorney General/Carson City Elko County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (0)-1947 

# Zcor2-
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22504]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98690; File No. SR-MIAX-2023-30]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities 
Exchange, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
the Fee Schedule To Modify Certain Connectivity Fees and Ports Fees

October 5, 2023.
    On August 8, 2023, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC 
(``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend certain connectivity and 
port fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on August 25, 2023.\4\ On September 29, 2023, pursuant to section 
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\5\ the Commission: (1) temporarily suspended 
the proposed rule change; and (2) instituted proceedings under section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On October 2, 2023, the 
Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-MIAX-2023-30).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98173 (August 21, 
2023), 88 FR 58378.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98657, 88 FR 68827 
(October 4, 2023).
    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22504 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 81

  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony in 
    honor of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization (NATO) and welcoming the three newest members of NATO, the 
 Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary, and the Czech Republic, 
                               into NATO.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 1999

  Mr. Gilman (for himself and Mr. Gejdenson) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony in 
    honor of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization (NATO) and welcoming the three newest members of NATO, the 
 Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary, and the Czech Republic, 
                               into NATO.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on April 23, 1999, for a ceremony in honor of the Fiftieth Anniversary 
of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and welcoming the 
three newest members of NATO, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of 
Hungary, and the Czech Republic, into NATO. Physical preparations for 
the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 
the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 12(A)

                 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            YEAR ENDED
                                                      13 Weeks Ended
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)                                9/25/99     1999     1998     1997       1996      1995
                                                          -------     ----     ----     ----       ----      ----
                                                       (unaudited)
<S>                                                         <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges
     Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs on
      all indebtedness                                     $ 5,368   $15,864   $ 7,336   $ 4,967   $ 3,934   $ 3,057


     Add interest element implicit in rentals                  470     1,158       521       394       222       211
                                                           -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------


     Total fixed charges                                   $ 5,838   $17,022   $ 7,857   $ 5,361   $ 4,156   $ 3,268
                                                           =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Income
     Income before income taxes                            $22,852   $53,863   $32,186   $ 6,400   $ 1,146       671


     Add fixed charges                                       5,838    17,022     7,857     5,361     4,156     3,295
                                                           -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   --------

     Income before fixed charges and income taxes          $28,690   $70,885   $40,043   $11,761   $ 5,302   $ 3,939
                                                           =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                            4.91      4.16      5.10      2.19      1.28      1.21
</TABLE>