alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022277EN.01031501.xml

| 27.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/315 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/315

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1299 of 24 March 2022 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the content of position management controls by trading venues

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 197 of 26 July 2022
  )

On page 2, in Article 2(1):

for:

‘1.   As part of their position management controls, trading venues offering trading in commodity derivatives shall set accountability levels in the spot month as defined in Article 2(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation 2022/1301 (4) and in the other months as defined in Article 2(4) of Delegated Regulation 2022/1301 for commodity derivatives made available for trading that are physically settled or can be physically settled.’,

read:

‘1.   As part of their position management controls, trading venues offering trading in commodity derivatives shall set accountability levels in the spot month as defined in Article 2, point (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1302 (4) and in the other months as defined in Article 2, point (4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1302 for commodity derivatives made available for trading that are physically settled or can be physically settled.’.

On page 2, footnote 4:

for:

‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1301 of 31 March 2022 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1226 as regards the information to be provided in accordance with the STS notification requirements for on-balance-sheet synthetic securitisations (OJ L 197, xx.xx.2022, p. 10).’,

read:

‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1302 of 20 April 2022 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the application of position limits to commodity derivatives and procedures for applying for exemption from position limits (OJ L 197, 26.7.2022, p. 52).’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1

       

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         372,898
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,161,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,519,440
<PP&E>                                         3,032,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,202,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,350,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,165,482
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       66,933
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,117,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,350,321
<SALES>                                        48,285,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               48,285,615
<CGS>                                          39,257,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  39,257,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,038,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             97,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,013,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                   132,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            880,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   880,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.13
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1056403
<SECURITIES>                                    174800
<RECEIVABLES>                                    72699
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1308076
<PP&E>                                        28080988
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                29519920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           116169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    29403751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  29519920
<SALES>                                         779900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1077869
<CGS>                                           125537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   112617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                218700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 621015
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             621015
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    621015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    19.19
        

</TABLE>
No. 62922.

#### Joseph H. Brown *&*Son *v.*United States,

protests 58/11903, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. H. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2018, following consideration of the

responses to this Court’s Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed 

on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute. It is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action 

by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; and

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County shall 

enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s clients or 

fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g).

In the event that Respondent fully complies with the ODC’s records requests, he 

can seek dissolution or amendment of this order, or request accelerated disposition of 

the charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6).

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to 

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

Petitioner

v.

DORY L. SATER,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2530 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 157 DB 2018

Attorney Reg. No. 83783

(Delaware County)
A89A2333.

#### FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK v. CUMBERLAND CREEK COUNTRY CLUB.

(390 SE2d 422)

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

First Union National Bank (“First Union”) filed an action against Cumberland Creek Country Club (“Cumberland Creek”) and alleged that Cumberland Creek is in default in the repayment of a secured debt. First Union sought to recover on the debt and to foreclose Cumberland Creek’s right to redeem its interest in the collateral. Cumberland Creek answered and admitted that the debt was past due, but defended on the ground that it had cured the default by tendering “partial payment” to First Union. Cumberland Creek counterclaimed and alleged that it had suffered damages as the result of First Union’s failure to promptly surrender the title to collateral which had been pledged (hypothecated) in an unrelated loan transaction. The case was tried before the court without a jury and the trial court denied First Union’s “request for a writ of possession . . .” and entered judgment for Cumberland Creek on its “counterclaim in the *333amount of $1,460.00.” The trial court did not rule on First Union’s claim to recover on the debt. This appeal followed. *Held:*

Decided January 12, 1990

Rehearing denied January 26, 1990.

*Jones, Morrison & Womack, Lewis N. Jones,*for appellant.

*Hoitink, Whitfield & Halpin, James R. Whitfield,*for appellee.

“Where there is a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment. OCGA § 9-11-54 (Code Ann. § 81A-154). In such circumstances, there must be an express determination under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) (Code Ann. § 81A-154) or there must be compliance with the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) (Code Ann. § 6-701). Where neither of these code sections are followed . . . , the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. *Myers v. Mobil America Corp.,*132 Ga. App. 331 (208 SE2d 169); *Johnson v. Martin,*132 Ga. App. 813 (209 SE2d 256); *Hancock v. Oates,*244 Ga. 175, 177 (259 SE2d 437).” *Spivey v. Rogers,*167 Ga. App. 729 (307 SE2d 677). In the case sub judice, the trial court did not adjudicate First Union’s claim on the debt. It therefore follows that no final judgment was entered. Consequently, since there was no express determination under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) and since there was no compliance with OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), this appeal must be dismissed. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Carley, C. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*
<PAGE>   1
                              THE DIAL CORPORATION
             EXHIBIT 12.1 -- COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF FIXED CHARGES
                       (000s OMITTED, EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   1997       1996      1995      1994       1993
<S>                                               <C>       <C>       <C>         <C>        <C> 
Income (loss) before income taxes..............   $133,935  $42,423   $(47,016)   $147,540   $133,304

FIXED CHARGES:

   
Interest expense...............................     20,435   19,973     25,683      16,409      9,250
Amortization of debt expense...................         --       --         --          --         --
Interest portion of rent expense...............      1,960    1,139        970         996        975
Preferred stock dividend requirements..........         --       --         --          --         --
                                                   -------  -------    -------    --------    -------      
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES............................     22,395   21,112     26,653      17,405     10,225
                                                  --------  -------   --------    --------   --------      
ADJUSTED EARNINGS (LOSS).......................   $156,330  $63,535   $(20,363)   $164,945   $143,529
                                                  ========  =======   ========    ========   ========     
RATIO OF ADJUSTED EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES....       6.98     3.01        (1)        9.48      14.04
</TABLE>
    

(1) In the fiscal year 1995, fixed charges exceeded adjusted earnings by
approximately $47.0 million.
##### 



Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended January 31, 2008, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/ THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 48
Before the Second Division,

May 23, 1966

No. P66/64.

protest 65/3047 (New York).

#### Medisco, Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of parts of stethoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Findings Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 262, Abstract 68126), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF KERR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 10, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

The State of Texas, Appellant(s)

V.

Christopher Glen Adams, Appellee(s)

No. 04-13-00048-CR and Tr. Ct. No. CR120324

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order 

granting Appellee Christopher Glen Adams is REVERSED and this matter is 

REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this 

opinion.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, 

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on February 9, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 439

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Correcting the enrollment of H.R. 2614.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 439

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2614)

3 to amend the Small Business Investment Act to make im4 provements to the certified development company pro-
2

•HCON 439 EH

1 gram, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of

2 Representatives shall make the following corrections:

3 (1) In section 1, insert before ‘‘are hereby en4 acted into law’’ the following: ‘‘, as modified in ac5 cordance with section 3,’’.

6 (2) In section 2, insert before the period at the

7 end the following: ‘‘, modified in accordance with

8 section 3’’.

9 (3) Add at the end the following new section:

10 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION TO TEXT OF BILL ENACTED BY REF11 ERENCE.

12 The modification referred to in sections 1 and 2 is

13 to the text of the bill H.R. 5538, as referred to in section

14 1(1), and is as follows: the quoted matter in the amend15 ment proposed to be made by section 2 of such bill is

16 modified by striking ‘‘June 30, 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘De17 cember 31, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 30,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors
Paracel Online Systems, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-3 and related Prospectus of WavePhore, Inc. for the registration of
454,654 shares of its common stock of our report dated July 3, 1997, with
respect to the balance sheets of Paracel Online Systems, Inc. (formerly Carthage
International, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of Paracel, Inc., as of December
31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the period from January 1, 1995 to
December 4, 1995 (Predecessor), the period from December 5, 1995 (Acquisition)
to December 31, 1995 and the year ended December 31, 1996 (Successor), which
report appears in Form 8-K/A of WavePhore, Inc. dated August 12, 1997.

We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
Prospectus. 


                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
January 28, 1998
Case No. 13,015.

#### SMITH v. BOHN.

[4 Wash. C. C. 127.] 1

Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

April, 1821.

Writs — Limit op Time op Service — Common Appearance.

To entitle the plaintiff to file a common appearance for the defendant, under the act of the assembly of Pennsylvania of the 20th of March, 1724, the summons must have been served ten days before the return day. But if it was not served that length of time, the writ is not to be dismissed, but the plaintiff must proceed regularly to enforce an appearance.

Buie obtained by the defendant on the plaintiff, to show cause why the writ of summons should not be set aside for irregularity, the service not being ten days before the couid: to which it was returnable.

Mr. Sergeant, in support of the rule,

contended. that under the act of assembly of the •20th of March, 1724 (1 Smith’s Laws), 105, the practice in the state courts has been to set aside the writ of summons, where it appears not to have been served ten days before the return day. The first section of the act provides. that (with certain exceptions) the process against a freeholder inhabiting the province. shall be by summons; and that if the defendant shall not appear at the day of the return thereof, but makes default, and if the officer who served the writ, shall certify on oath or affirmation that on or before the return day, he summoned the defendant in the way prescribed by the act; “upon the return, If the defendant has been so served ten days, and the plaintiff had filed his declaration within five days, before the court to which such writ is returnable, it shall be lawful to and for the plaintiff in such action, to file a common appearance for the defendant so making default, and proceed to judgment and execution by nihil dicit.”

Mr. Wallace, for plaintiff,

admitted, that unless the writ be served ten days before the reTurn day, the plaintiff cannot proceed under the act to obtain judgment by nihil dicit; but the service is good, and the plaintiff may proceed in a regular way to obtain judgment.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington. Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard I’etors, Jr., Esq.]

WASHINGTON. Circuit Justice.

The reasonable construction of this act seems to be, that, to entitle the plaintiff to file a common appearance for the defendant, and to enter up judgment against him by nihil dicit, the writ must have been served ten days, and the declaration filed five days before the return day. But if the plaintiff does not seek to avail himself of this privilege, but is content to proceed in like manner as if the defendant had not made default, there can be no reason for setting aside the writ, or why the plaintiff may not file liis declaration at any time after the five days, and proceed as if the defendant had entered an appearance.

Let the rule be discharged.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-190459), and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-175139, 333-164507, 333-164494, 333-164302, 333-157664, 333-149901, 333-132949, and 333-206294) of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., of our report dated June 28 , 2018 relating to the financial statements of Venta de Boletos por Computadora, S.A. de C.V., which appears in this Form 10-K.








PricewaterhouseCoopers S.C.





/s/ José Carlos del Castillo Díaz





José Carlos del Castillo Díaz


Mexico City, Mexico


June 28, 2019
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-190459), and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-175139, 333-164507, 333-164494, 333-164302, 333-157664, 333-149901, 333-132949, and 333-206294) of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., of our report dated June 28, 2018 relating to the financial statements of Venta de Boletos por Computadora, S.A. de C.V., which appears in this Form 10-K.








PricewaterhouseCoopers S.C.





/s/ José Carlos del Castillo Díaz


José Carlos del Castillo Díaz


Mexico City, Mexico


June 28, 2018
October 23, 1961

No. 66180.

#### The Spiegel Brothers Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 59/25951.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,823,717
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,018,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    190,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,033,183
<PP&E>                                       7,270,918<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 265,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,039,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,436,569
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        378
<COMMON>                                        19,641
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,582,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,039,098
<SALES>                                      1,533,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,533,316
<CGS>                                                0<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,439,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,899,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,338,941)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,338,941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,338,941)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES GOODWILL 922,724 NET
<F2>NOT CALCULATED
<F3>NOT CALCULATED
</FN>
        

</TABLE>