alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 

Backlog Requests

Fiscal 

Year 

Number of 

Pending Requests 

at Beginning of 

FY 

Estimated 

Number of 

Requests 

Incoming 

During FY 

Agency's Goal 

for Number of 

Requests to be 

Processed 

During FY 

Agency's Goal for 

Number of Requests 

Pending Beyond 

Statutory Time 

Period (i.e., Backlog) 

at End of FY 

2008 5 100 95 5 

Fiscal 

Year 

Projected Number 

of Requests 

Pending Beyond 

Statutory Time 

Period (Backlog) 

at Beginning of 

FY 

Estimated 

Number of 

Requests 

Incoming 

During FY 

Agency's Goal 

for Number of 

Requests to be 

Processed 

During FY 

Agency's Goal for 

Number of Requests 

Pending Beyond 

Statutory Time 

Period (Backlog) at 

End of FY 

2009 5 98 94 4 

2010 4 95 92 3
Exhibit 32.1











SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS






This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.




The undersigned, who are (i) the President and Chief Executive Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of United Development Funding III, L.P. (the “Partnership”), and President and Chief Executive Officer of UMT Services, Inc., sole general partner of UMTH Land Development, L.P., and (ii) the Chief Financial Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of the Partnership, each hereby certify as follows:




The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.









Dated this March 31, 2011











/s/ Hollis M. Greenlaw


Hollis M. Greenlaw


President and Chief Executive Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of the Registrant, and President and Chief Executive Officer of UMT Services, Inc., sole general partner of UMTH Land Development, L.P.








/s/ Cara D. Obert


Cara D. Obert


Chief Financial Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of the Registrant
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                                AMENDMENT TO THE

                            FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.

             EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


         WHEREAS, Finlay Enterprises, Inc. (the "Corporation") maintains the
Finlay Enterprises, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Plan");

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the Article 12 of the Plan, the Corporation may
amend the Plan at any time; and

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to correct a
scrivener's error in Section 6.4 of the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of May 1,
2003, as follows:


         1. The first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 6.4 of the
Plan is amended by substituting "April 1" in lieu of "March 1" therein.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed this 19th day of
June, 2003.

                           FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.

                           By: /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                               -------------------------------------------
                               Arthur E. Reiner
                               Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 57 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 157
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 57

                          [Report No. 106-262]

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
relations treatment) to the products of the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 1999

 Mr. Rohrabacher introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

                             July 26, 1999

 Additional sponsors: Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
Wolf, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Barton of 
    Texas, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Bonior, Mr. Stark, Mr. 
  Scarborough, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Hunter, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. 
Cook, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr. Stearns, 
                            and Ms. McKinney

                             July 26, 1999

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to 
the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered 
                             to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
relations treatment) to the products of the People's Republic of China.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
approve the extension of the authority contained in section 402(c) of 
the Trade Act of 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on 
June 3, 1999, with respect to the People's Republic of China.
                                     

                                                 Union Calendar No. 157

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 57

                          [Report No. 106-262]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
relations treatment) to the products of the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 26, 1999

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to 
the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered 
                             to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Li3 Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luis Saenz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Luis SaenzName:
Luis SaenzTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
December 1, 2011
No. 52419.

protests 79887-K, etc. (Boston, etc.).

#### Browne Vintners Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS EXHIBIT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS
EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE
SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY
OTHER FILING WHICH INCORPORATES THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE, UNLESS SUCH OTHER
FILING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,721
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  230,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,794
<INVENTORY>                                     17,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,052
<PP&E>                                         178,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,199
<BONDS>                                        281,936
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           149
<OTHER-SE>                                     198,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,873
<SALES>                                        141,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,410
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,165
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          541
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,884
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                              125,169
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     3,099,028
<ALLOWANCES>                        (17,000)
<INVENTORY>                       2,377,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,976,680
<PP&E>                            2,660,071
<DEPRECIATION>                     (409,254)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    9,930,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             4,372,366
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                              3,257
<OTHER-SE>                        2,249,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      9,930,558
<SALES>                          19,711,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 19,711,749
<CGS>                            18,710,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    18,710,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,007,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  231,364
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (277,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (277,226)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.09)


</TABLE>
No. 53886.

#### Borgen & Langsan *v.*United States,

protest 146398-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,455,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,024,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                   353,819
<INVENTORY>                                 31,127,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,459,128
<PP&E>                                      30,431,834
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,187,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,865,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,089,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,750,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,674
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,854,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,956,538
<SALES>                                     65,954,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,954,399
<CGS>                                       48,575,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,575,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,793,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               177,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,408,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,999,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                   800,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,199,998
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,199,998
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50428

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SALOMON ESCOBAR-GALDAMEZ, also

known as Jose Saloman Escobar-Galdamez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-725-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Salomon

Escobar-Galdamez raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov

Pittsburgh

Calgary

Chicago

Oklahoma

City

Dallas

Los

Angeles

Sacramento

Denver

Salem

Houston

New 

Orleans

M

Last 30DLst yr 30D5 Yr 30 D Avg

Cumulative HDDs by City 

30 Day Intervals

Source: Bloomberg Weather Data

Atlanta

Updated

Natural Gas Trading: HDD Weather Map

29

144

21

‐‐‐

‐

5

‐

49

311

29

‐

68

0

‐

19

‐

‐‐‐

120442

48

‐

115

5

34

111

31

83

228

86

215591184
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov

Pittsburgh

Calgary

Chicago 

Oklahoma

City

Dallas Los Angeles

Sacramento

Denver

Salem

Houston New 

Orleans 

Last 30DLst yr 30D5 Yr 30 D Avg

Cumulative CDDs by City 

30 Day Intervals

Source: Bloomberg Weather Data

Atla

Updated

Natural Gas Trading: CDD Weather Map

323

9547

172

557394508

7618

163

258

99

358

511363497

33

4

134

267

8

256

14

‐

31

51

8

71

408258498

5

‐

19
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov

Columbia

TCO Pool

AECO

Pricing PointBOLD –30 Day Avg PriceGreen – % increase from previous yearRed – % decrease from previous year

ChicagoCitygate

NGPL

Midcont

El Paso

Permian

SoCal 

Border

PG&E

Citygate

CIG

HSC Henry 

Hub

FGT-Z3

Day Ahead Natural Gas Pric

30 Day Average ($/MMBtu

Source: Bloomberg Platts Data Updated

Natural Gas Trading: Price Map

NW

Stanfield

$2.56

‐6%

$2.35

‐5%

$2.59

‐6%

$2.45

‐11%

$1.88

‐15%

$0.22

‐87%

$2.55

‐10%

$0.83

‐37%

$1.78

‐8%

$3.20

19%

$1.72

‐18%

$1.97

1%
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov

Source: Derived from Bloomberg data 

Natural Gas, Coal and Oil Prices (Converted)

Natural Gas Trading: Gas, Oil and Coal

$0$2$4$6$8

$10$12$14

Fuel Price ($/MMBtu)

Nymex Henry HubBig Sandy Barge (Low Sulfur Coal)WTI Crude Oil
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov/oversig

Source: Derived from Bloomberg data 

Nymex Futures Curves

Natural Gas Trading: Nymex Futures Curves

$2.10$2.30$2.50$2.70$2.90$3.10$3.30

Aug‐19 Feb‐20 Aug‐20 Feb‐21

Nymex Futures Curves ($/MMBtu)

6/27/2018 5‐30‐2019 1‐27‐2019 6‐27‐2019
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov/oversig

Natural Gas Trading : Oil Curves

Source: Derived from Bloomberg data 

Brent vs WTI

$0

$10$20$30$40$50$60$70$80$90

$100

Oil Prices ($/Barrel)

WTI Oil Price Brent Crude Oil Price
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov/oversig

Natural Gas Trading: Nymex Futures Curve Settlement

Source: Derived from Bloomberg data 

Nymex Settlement

$2.24$2.25$2.26$2.27$2.28$2.29$2.30$2.31$2.32$2.33

Price ($/MMBtu)

July 2019 Nymex Contract Price July 2019 ICE Contract PrSettlement Period Platts July Bidweek PriceNymex Settled Price

Trade Time for June 26 2019
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • Market Oversight • www.ferc.gov/oversig

Natural Gas Liquids (NGLs) Prices

U

Natural Gas Trading: NGLs

$0$2$4$6$8

$10$12$14$16$18

$/MMBtu

Henry Hub Natural Gas EthanePropane Butane/Iso-ButaneNatural Gasoline
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 10, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 10, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0465. HOPE OF COLUMBUS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY

HEALTH.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2014CV251347
obtained commensurate with the granting of this request for exemption. Flight data 

including UA flight time, Control Unit operation time, incident, accident, and details 

concerning any deviations from normal operations will be available to FAA for use in 

collecting data regarding the use of UAS as part of this application. This data may be 

submitted to FAA via traditional means, e.g. COA Monthly Reports, or other means as 

required. 

Conclusion 

The petitioner is requesting this exemption for the purposes of "aerial 

photography, cinematography, videography, mapping, crop surveying, inspections and 

other flight operations". The reason for such a general and broad based request is that 

the petitioner wishes to utilize a business strategy of horizontal integration and 

maximize economies of scope in order to capitalize on opportunities as they may arise 

in the future without the long turnaround time associated with additional exemptions. 

The petitioner's business model is based on the idea of offering ad hoc small UAS 

services to individuals or companies who wish to employ these services as a safe, 

effective, and legal option to enhance their business or hobby. The petitioner's own 

market research shows pent up demand for these services currently exists in the real 

estate market and other markets are just beginning to emerge. Although videography 

and photography are included in the request, the primary objective will be aerial survey 

of farm crops for precision agriculture. The petitioner has identified universities and 

other agencies that could benefit from the operation requested in this application. 

A quick internet search will show that many are currently operating similar UAS 

in exactly this fashion without, it is assumed, FAA authorization. The petitioner has 

refrained from engaging in commercial use of the UAS. The primary purpose of seeking 

this exemption is to obtain the capability to offer those services while remaining in 

compliance. The petitioner has 27 years of experience in the radio control model aircraft 

hobby, 20 years experience in general, military, and commercial aviation and holds an 

airman certificate, AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOT, as well as a current second class 

medical certificate .. 

Respectfully submitted,
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 15, 2023

No. 04-22-00768-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.S.R., J.A.L., AND P.L., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-02034

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a final order terminating appellant’s parental rights 

which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was 

filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. The appellees’ brief was due on February 6, 2023. However, 

the appellees have filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the appellees’ brief. The 

motion is GRANTED. The appellees’ brief is due on or before February 27, 2023.

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests 

for extensions of time will be disfavored.

It is so ORDERED on February 15, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY