alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         119,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,298,913<F4>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    178,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379,716
<PP&E>                                       4,480,436<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 500,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,702,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,551,925
<BONDS>                                      1,833,615
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        378
<COMMON>                                        26,825
<OTHER-SE>                                     289,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,702,726
<SALES>                                         96,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,511
<CGS>                                                0<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,417,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             737,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,908,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,908,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (177,575)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,086,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
<FN>
<F1>Include Assets held for sale
<F2>Not calculated
<F3>Include discontinued operations
<F4>Include noncurrent notes receivable
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule Contain Summary Financial Information Extracted From 
     Balance Sheets and Statements of Income
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000878616
<NAME>                        Erox Corporation
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              7,886
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,921,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (541,383)
<INVENTORY>                                     4,806,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                6,288,257
<PP&E>                                            790,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (658,717)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,420,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,546,346
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       17,667,023
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,793,363)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,420,006
<SALES>                                         8,913,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                8,913,831
<CGS>                                           1,889,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,889,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,749,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 36,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,747,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,747,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,747,434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.37)
        


</TABLE>
No. 60674.

#### S. S. Kresge Co. *v.*United States,

protests 227174-K, etc. (New York).

*478Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aquarium sea moss similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Westchester Aquarium Supply Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 146, C. D. 1767), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0952.WAYNEANDREWFAMILY HARRIGAN JR. et al. v.AMERICAN

HOMES 4 RENT PROPERTIES EIGHT, LLC.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, Wayne Andrew Family Harrigan, Jr., as beneficiary, and Ronald

Eugene Family Pou, Jr., astrustee of JMH Freedom Trust, appealed to the state court,

which entered a writ of possession in favor of plaintiff American Homes 4 Rent

Properties Eight, LLC, on November 14, 2016. Harrigan and Pou then filed a notice

of appeal on December 1, 2016. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate

court decision, Harrigan and Pou were required to follow the discretionary appeal

proceduresto obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan

v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Their

failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Second, this appeal is untimely. Although a notice of appeal generally may be

filed within thirty days of entry of the order sought to be appealed, appeals from

judgments in dispossessory actions must be filed within seven days of the date the

judgment was entered. See OCGA § 44-7-56; Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga.

App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Harrigan and Pou’s appeal is untimely,

as it was filed 17 days after the state court’s order was entered. 

January 20, 2017
For these reasons, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/20/2017
# L_2022114EN.01021201.xml

| 12.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 114/212 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 114/212

---

to Council Regulation (EU) 2022/328 of 25 February 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 49 of 25 February 2022
  )

On page 47, in Annex I,

for:

‘ITALY

https://www.esteri.it/mae/it/politica_estera/politica_europea/misure_deroghe’,

read:

‘ITALY

https://www.esteri.it/it/politica-estera-e-cooperazione-allo-sviluppo/politica_europea/misure_deroghe/’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 409 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 409

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make corrections 
                in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1654.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the following 
corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1654:
            (1) In section 1(b), in the item relating to section 205 in 
        the table of contents, insert ``research utilization and 
        commercialization'' after ``Space station''.
            (2) In section 2(4)--
                    (A) insert ``the'' after ``commercial providers 
                of''; and
                    (B) strike the comma after ``reusable space 
                vehicles''.
            (3) In section 201(b)--
                    (A) strike ``the Russian Service Module, other'' 
                and insert ``any'';
                    (B) strike ``, or Russian'' and insert ``or any 
                Russian'';
                    (C) strike ``the Russian Service Module, or any 
                other Russian element in the critical path or Russian 
                launch service'' and insert ``any Russian element in 
                the critical path or any Russian launch services''; and
                    (D) strike the comma after ``with the permanent 
                replacement''.
            (4) In section 203(a)(2), strike the comma after ``Sciences 
        and Applications''.
            (5) In the section heading of section 205, insert 
        ``research utilization and commercialization'' after ``space 
        station''.
            (6) In section 303, strike the comma after ``fullest extent 
        feasible''.
            (7) In section 317(b), strike ``October'' and insert 
        ``December''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 130

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Razor Resources Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended April 30, 2007 filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), eachof the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

| March 14, 2008 | By: /s/ "Jordan Welsh"                                                    |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           | Jordan Welsh, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief      Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 127 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``December 8, 2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
(Reap. Dec. 10607)

#### Unitron Import Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 32158, etc.

(Decided October 29, 1963)

*Lawrence*<£ *Tuttle*and *Glad. & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*John TV. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, are limited to the merchandise shipped by Kajishin Shoten and Shimamura Shoten and said merchandise was entered or withdrawn from customs warehouse for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and was therefore appraised under Section 402(b) as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, said merchandise not on the final list published in T.D. 54521.

> 2. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal market of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoice values, net packed, or plus packing where packing is listed separately on the invoice as not being included in the invoice values.

> *4273. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A,” are submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise shipped by Kajishin Shoten and Shimamura Shoten, described in the invoices covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values were the invoice unit values, net, packed, or plus packing where packing is listed separately on the invoices as not being included in the invoice values.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 58

Recognizing the importance of veterans to the United States and expressing

support for the goals of Veterans Educate Today’s Students (VETS) Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. JOHN, Mr. ROMEROBARCELO ́, Mr. RUSH, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BALDACCI, Mr. ABERCROMBIE,

Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. FILNER, Mr.

PASCRELL, Mr. LUTHER, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. HOLT, Mr. RANGEL, Mr.

MCGOVERN, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. SHOWS, Ms.

KILPATRICK, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BORSKI, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. ROTHMAN,

Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. FOSSELLA, and Mr. FROST) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the importance of veterans to the United States

and expressing support for the goals of Veterans Educate

Today’s Students (VETS) Day.

Whereas the United States has, in the course of its history,

fought in many wars and conflicts to defend freedom and

to protect the interests of the Nation;

Whereas millions of men and women have served the Nation

in time of need as members of the United States Armed

Forces;
2

•HCON 58 IH

Whereas the service of veterans has been vital to the history

of the Nation, and the sacrifices made by veterans and

their families should not be forgotten with the passage of

time;

Whereas children throughout the Nation would benefit from

programs that provide education about veterans and that

instill a patriotic appreciation of the sacrifices made by

veterans to defend freedom and to protect the interests

of the Nation;

Whereas efforts are being made throughout the Nation to devote November 10 to an event known as Veterans Educate Today’s Students Day; and

Whereas schools that participate in Veterans Educate Today’s Students Day set aside a portion of the school day

for the study, recognition, and appreciation of veterans:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the importance of veterans to the

4 United States;

5 (2) expresses support for the goals of Veterans

6 Educate Today’s Students Day;

7 (3) urges teachers, civic leaders, and veterans

8 to carry out programs that educate children about

9 the service of veterans and the sacrifices made by

10 veterans and their families; and

11 (4) encourages the people of the United States

12 to participate in local and national activities recog-
3

•HCON 58 IH

1 nizing Veterans Educate Today’s Students Day and

2 other events that foster education about the impor3 tance of veterans to the Nation.

Æ
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 20, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-754

Lower Tribunal No. 13-19277

________________



### Eda A. Perez-Rios

, Appellant,

vs.



### The Graham Companies

,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Marin

, Judge.

Lindsey M. Tenberg (Lighthouse Point)

, for appellant.

The Chartwell Law Offices, LLP, and Mitchell L. Lundeen

, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.In this slip-and-fall case, Eda A. Perez-Rios, the plaintiff below, appeals a

final summary judgment entered in favor of The Graham Companies. At her

deposition, Ms. Perez-Rios indicated that, on the morning of a clear day, she

tripped on a four-inch high step leading from the pavement to a building owned by

The Graham Companies. The step was plainly visible. The pavement above and

below the step was constructed of red brick. In contrast, the step was constructed

of white stone. Photographs of the area where she fell, which she authenticated,

indicated no particular defect. There was no evidence of a foreign object on the

step, uneven wear and tear, inadequate lighting, or wet or slippery conditions.

When directly asked, Ms. Perez-Rios could not identify any defects in the step. No

contradictory evidence, such as an expert’s report, was submitted into the record

which might have created a disputed issue of fact regarding any defect in the step

which could be resolved only by a jury or judge sitting as a fact-finder.

Under these circumstances, the trial court properly entered summary

judgment against Ms. Perez-Rios. “Summary judgment is designed to test the

sufficiency of the evidence to determine if there is sufficient evidence at issue to

justify a trial or formal hearing on the issues raised in the pleadings.” Fla. Bar v.

Greene

, 926 So. 2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006). “A party should not be put to the

expense of going through a trial, where the only possible result will be a directed

verdict.” Martin Petroleum Corp. v. Amerada Hess Corp.

, 769 So. 2d 1105, 1108

2(Fla. 4th DCA 2000). See also Aventura Mall Venture v. Olson

, 561 So. 2d 319,

320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (“An owner is entitled to assume that the invitee will

perceive that which would be obvious to him [or her] upon the ordinary use of his

own sense[s], and is not required to give the invitee notice or warning of an

obvious danger.”) (citation omitted); Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. v.

Ferguson

, 556 So. 2d 1207, 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (“Some conditions are

simply so open and obvious, so common and so ordinarily innocuous, that they can

be held as a matter of law to not constitute a hidden dangerous condition.”).

Affirmed.

3
No. 50788.

Suit 4510.

#### United *States*v. *N. Wagman & Co.*

C. D. 913 reversed. C. A. D. 320.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Respondent

v.

FRANCIS X. MURRAY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 429 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justices Wecht and Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of 

this matter.
# Inputs 1

# Example 1

# Inputs 2

# Example 2

# Inputs 3

# Example 3

# Inputs 4

# Example 4
-                      -                        -  About 
                      - Newsroom
                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Events 
                      -  Blog 
                      -  Fact Sheets 
                      -  FEMA Live 
                      -  Mobile Products 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Podcast 
                      -  Social Media 
                      -  About Us 
                      -  Reports & Data 
                      -  FEMA in Action 

# Prepare Before a Disaster

                            - English 

Focuses on contracting actions recipients and subrecipients can take to prepare before a disaster strikes and addressing the procurement rules applicable during these times. 

**Date:**2024-04-09T17:00:002024-04-09T18:00:00April 9, 2024April 9, 2024

**Time:**5:00 pm - 6:00 pm

**Location:**Virtual

Register 

## Event Details

FEMA’s Grant Programs Directorate (GPD) is offering a series of one-hour trainings on the federal procurement rules applicable to recipients and subrecipients purchasing under a FEMA grant award. 

Click the blue "Register" button at the top of this page to sign up for the training.

### Topic

Prepare Before a Disaster – Focuses on contracting actions recipients and subrecipients can take to prepare before a disaster strikes and addressing the procurement rules applicable during these times.

### Target Audience

This training is appropriate for FEMA award recipients and subrecipients, including state, local, tribal and territorial government personnel; nonprofit organization staff; eligible private entities; and other non-federal entities. This training is also appropriate for FEMA staff.

### Delivery Format

These virtual trainings will be delivered using Adobe Connect. In advance of a training, please test your connection here.

##  Additional Resources

View the full training schedule to see all the upcoming Procurement Under Grant learning opportunities.
                  - PDAT Resource Library
                  - PDAT Field Manual
                  - PDAT Contract Provisions Guide  
                  - Roadmap to Procurement Compliance
                  -   State Entity Fact Sheet  
                  - Emergency and Exigency Fact Sheet
                  - Common Mistakes to Avoid for Non-State Entities Fact Sheet
                  - Prepare Before a Disaster Fact Sheet

Last updated January 8, 2024

Return to top