alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August 3, 2017

Mr. Kyle Tyson Gonzalez
1826 Hoover Drive
Normal, Illinois 61761

Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after
consultation with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved your
request pursuant to section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to become an institution-
affiliated party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”),
Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan holding company (“SLHC”). This approval is limited
to your being an institution-affiliated party of State Farm, including by working for an
independently owned agency that sells State Farm insurance products and products for State
Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington,
Illinois. Ifyou seek to work for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), or an
independently owned agency that sells products for another SLHC or BHC, you must obtain the
Board’s approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you to
the Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented could result in a
different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These representations
constitute conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and decision herein and,
as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. This action is also conditioned
specifically on your receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals and compliance with any terms
and conditions that may be imposed upon such approvals. Additionally, if you are convicted of,
or enter into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or
money laundering in the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC, BHC, or
independently owned agency that sells products for an SLHC or BHC, including any agency that
sells States Farm and State Farm Bank products.

.

Sincerely,

Mrruade MWY

Margaret M¢Closkey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board

112 U.S.C. § 1829.
No. 60656.

#### Herz Specialty Products Co. and Rietmann Pilcer Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 262666-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



Amendment No. 1 to
Appendix A to Employment Agreement
Between Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
and
G. Kenneth Stephens, Jr.
 Base Salary, Bonus Compensation and Benefits
 1.
    
    Effective July 14, 2005, Employees title(s) shall be Executive Vice President and President
  Western Division. Effective August 1, 2005, Employees Base Salary shall be $325,000.
Effective August 1, 2006, Employee shall be eligible for a Base Salary increase of $25,000 per
year, based upon the achievement of performance criteria to be established by the Compensation
Committee. Employees principal work location shall be the Dallas, Texas metropolitan area.2.
    
    Paragraph 2 of Appendix A is unaffected by this amendment and remains in full force and
effect.3.
    
    For Fiscal Year 2006, the Employee shall be eligible to receive a maximum Bonus of up to 130%
of his Base Salary (or up to $422,500) based on such performance criteria as the Compensation
Committee shall deem appropriate in its discretion.
 Agreed to and accepted:
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.Date: October 11, 2005
    By:
    /s/JAMES W. MCFARLANDJames W. McFarlandCompensation Committee Chairman EMPLOYEEDate: October 11, 2005
    /s/G. KENNETH STEPHENS, JR.G. Kenneth Stephens, Jr.
(Reap. Dec. 11116)

#### Lolly Togs, Ltd. *v.*United States

Entry No. 999558, etc.

(Decided December 21, 1965)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:

> That the items marked “A” and checked ROB (Examiner’s initials) by Examiner Robert C. Brucato (Examiner’s name) on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement set forth in the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof, consist of defective footwear imported from Japan during the calendar year 1959.

> That said merchandise was appraised on the basis of export value as that value is defined in Section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, which basis of appraisement is not in dispute.

> That export value, defined as aforesaid, is equal to the invoice unit values for such footwear plus the proportionate share of the charges marked “X” on the invoices contained in the entries herein, less 25%.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals are abandoned as to any other merchandise listed an the invoices, and may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and bold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise, represented by the items marked with the letter “A” and the initials of the examiner on the invoices covered by these appeals, and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, plus the proportionate share of the charges marked “X” on the invoices contained in the entries herein, less 25 percent.

As to all other merchandise, the appeals, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                     U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                Date of Report (date of earliest event reported)
                                 March 15, 1999




                        PROLOGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




<TABLE>
<S>                                               <C>                           <C>       
            Arizona                                 1-13704                        86-0498857
(State or other jurisdiction                      (Commission                     (IRS Employer
        of incorporation)                         File Number)                  Identification No.)
</TABLE>



                            2030 East Speedway Blvd.
                              Tucson, Arizona 85719
               (Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


                                 (520) 320-1000
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)




<PAGE>   2


Item 4. Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant



         On March 15, 1999, the Company's client-auditor relationship with
auditors Arthur Andersen LLP ceased. On April 2, 1999, the Company engaged BDO
Seidman LLP as its principal accountant to audit the Registrant's financing
statements, commencing with its fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.




SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

PROLOGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.


Dated: April 12, 1999                 By:     /s/James M. Heim               
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James M. Heim
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
FILED

April 11, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

AMANDA LINN CASHION, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

)

)

VS. )

) Davidson Chancery

) No. 94-3739-II

EVELYN C. ROBERTSON, JR., in )

his capacity as Commissioner, ) Appeal No.

Tennessee Dept. of Mental Health ) 01A01-9506-CH-00257

and Mental Retardation, and )

DON G. HOLT, in his capacity as )

Commissioner, Tennessee Dept. of )

Personnel, )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

ORDER

DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

Amanda Linn Cashion has filed a petition for rehearing pursuant to Tenn.

R. App. P. 39 asserting that this court misapprehended the facts and controlling

issues of law in this case. The petition is respectfully denied.

ENTER, this ______ day of April, 1997.

____________________________

HENRY F. TODD, P.J., M.S. 

____________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE 

____________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Ex 32-1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Legal
Access Technologies, Inc., for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, I, Herbert C.
Leeming, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Legal Access Technologies, Inc. for
the quarter ended July 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended July 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects, financial
condition and results of operations of Legal Access Technologies, Inc.


                                        By:    /s/ Herbert C. Leeming

                                        Name:  Herbert C. Leeming

                                        Title: Principal Executive Officer

                                        Date:  October 17, 2005
Exhibit 23.1
   CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  
 We have
issued our reports dated March 16, 2009 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, schedules and internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Resource Capital Corp. and subsidiaries on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
Resource Capital Corp. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-151621, effective on June 12,
2008; File No. 333-146626, effective on May 29, 2008; and File No. 333-144519,
effective on July 12, 2007) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-151622, effective on June
12, 2008).
  
 /s/ Grant
Thornton LLP
 
 Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
 March 16,
2009
Opinion issued May 9 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00252
- CR

——————————— CHARLES ALLEN STEWART, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1375967

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Charles Allen Stewart , pleaded guilty to the state

- jail felony
offense of theft 1 and pleaded true to the allegations in two state

- jail felony

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2012 ).2

enhancement paragraphs. 2 The trial court found appellant guilty, found the enhancements true, and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for two years. Appellant has filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea

- bargained case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after obtainin g the trial court’s permission to appeal. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN . art. 44.02 (West 2006); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2); s ee Woods v. State , 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) . An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the
defen dant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 25.2(d). Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id

. The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea

- bargained case and t he defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appe al. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must

2 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 12.425(a ) (West Supp. 2012).3

dismiss a prohibited appeal without fu rther action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss thi s appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

**Description of the Cash Bonus Program of SWS Group, Inc.**

 

A component of the executive officer compensation program of SWS Group, Inc. (the “Company”) consists of cashbonuses based on the Company’s fiscal year operating results and the individual executive officer’s contribution for the year. The incentive compensation program provides for an aggregate bonus pool based on the Company’s annualreturn on equity. Allocation of the bonus pool to individual executive officers is determined using objective measures of business unit performance as well as subjective measures of the executive officer’s contribution to the Company’sfinancial and strategic objectives. If awarded, bonuses are paid early in the following fiscal year. The Company’s Compensation Committee believes that basing a portion of an executive officer’s compensation on performance motivates theexecutive to perform at the highest possible level.
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended July 31, 2010, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/   THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/   THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chelsea
Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President,
Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    J. Nick RiehleJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer


April 7, 2011
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



                            RURAL/METRO CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                           Six months ended
                                                  Year ended June 30,                        December 31,
                                   --------------------------------------------------     -----------------
                                     1993      1994      1995      1996      1997           1996     1997
                                   --------------------------------------------------     -----------------
<S>                                 <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>            <C>      <C>       
Income from continuing operations
 before Income taxes and
 extraordinary item                 $4,156    $ 7,610   $12,881    $19,556   $22,084       $11,984   $17,006

ADD
 Portion of rents representative
  of the interest factor               818        841     1,334      1,782     2,208         1,120     1,627
 Interest on indebtedness            2,896      1,780     3,059      5,108     5,720         2,430     5,409
 Amortization of debt expenses
  and premium                                      55       141        259       332           162       188

    Income as adjusted               7,870     10,286    17,415     26,705    30,344        15,696     24,230

FIXED CHARGES

 Interest on indebtedness            2,896      1,780     3,059      5,108     6,097         2,489      5,849
 Amortization of debt expense
   and premium                                     55       141        259       332           162        188
 Portion of rents representative
   of the interest factor              818        841     1,334      1,782     2,208         1,120      1,627

    Fixed charges                    3,714      2,676     4,534      7,149     8,637         3,771      7,664

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges     2.1        3.8       3.8        3.7       3.5           4.2        3.2

</TABLE>
WestCoastAerialsLLC

Additionalrequestedinformationfordocket#FAA-2014-0937

DescriptionofAircraft.

Aircraft#1:

Manufacturer:Foxtech

Model:KrakenK130

Type:Octocopter

FlightController:DJIA2

RadioControlSystem Transmitter:FutabaT14SG2.4Ghz

VideoTransmission:5.8ghz

Maximum TakeoffWeight:20Kg

Aircraft#2:

Manufacturer:DJI

Model:S1000

Type:Octocopter

FlightController:DJIA2

RadioControlSystem Transmitter:FutabaT14SG2.4Ghz

VideoTransmission:5.8ghz

Maximum TakeoffWeight:11Kg

Aircraft#3:

Manufacturer:DJI

Model:S900

Type:Hexacopter

FlightController:DJIA2

RadioControlSystem Transmitter:FutabaT14SG2.4Ghz

VideoTransmission:5.8ghz

Maximum TakeoffWeight:8.2Kg

Aircraft#4:

Manufacturer:DJI

Model:FlamewheelF550

Type:Hexacopter

FlightController:DJIA2

RadioControlSystem Transmitter:FutabaT14SG2.4Ghz

VideoTransmission:5.8ghz

Maximum TakeoffWeight:2.4Kg

Aircraft#5:

Manufacturer:DJI

Model:Phantom 2

Type:Quadcopter

FlightController:NAZA

RadioControlSystem Transmitter:FutabaT14SG2.4Ghz

VideoTransmission:5.8ghz

Maximum TakeoffWeight:1.3Kg
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           90384
<SECURITIES>                                     50835
<RECEIVABLES>                                    45197
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2737
<INVENTORY>                                      55532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                250143
<PP&E>                                           52253
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  329765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            39893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      288851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    329765
<SALES>                                         176247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                185256
<CGS>                                           109751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   179312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (5957)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1752
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11901
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3456
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
        

</TABLE>