alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2120

RICHARD L. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-99-272-2-19-AJ)

Submitted: December 29, 1999 Decided: February 4, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mortimer M. Weinberg, III, WEINBERG, BROWN & CURTIS, Sumter, South

Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney,

John B. Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Arthur J.

Fried, General Counsel, Charlotte J. Hardnett, Principal Deputy

General Counsel, John M. Sacchetti, Associate General Counsel,

Sharon M. Saffron, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 9, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on July 12, 1999. It is the date the order was

entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of

the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a);

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Williams appeals the order of the district court

granting the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Apfel, No. CA-99-

275-2-19-AJ (D.S.C. July 12, 1999).* There is no merit to

Williams’ arguments that the Administrative Law Judge lacked

jurisdiction to issue his July 1995 amended decision or that the

doctrine of “manifest injustice” applies to Williams’ case. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Before the Second Division,

July 8, 1946

No. 51240.

#### Protests 867044-G, etc., of Judkins & McCormick Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of racello hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291. Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Ronald D. Ormand

Ronald D. Ormand,Chief Financial Officer
Before the Third Division,

June 19, 1946

No. 51197.

#### Protests 114455-K, etc., of W. F. Mackay (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-31158

Summary Calendar

 

LARRY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-1611

--------------------

July 29, 2002

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Williams, Louisiana prisoner # 86172, seeks a

certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the denial of his

“motion for default judgment,” filed after the district court

conditionally granted his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and after the

state court resentenced him. To the extent that Williams argues

that the State failed to comply with the district court’s

judgment by returning him to the Tenth instead of the Eleventh

Judicial District Court of Louisiana for resentencing, COA is
No. 01-31158

-2-

DENIED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000).

To the extent that Williams’ postjudgment motion sought

review of the newly imposed state court sentence on the merits,

the motion was unauthorized and should have been denied for lack

of jurisdiction. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42

(5th Cir. 1994). Under this second argument, because Williams

has “appealed from the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized

motion” (id. at 142), COA is not necessary. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B). Under this ground, the appeal is without

arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, it is DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. Rule. 42.2. 

COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

Jeff Hale
312 E. Southfork Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85048

June 7, 2002

Jeff:

The purpose of this letter is to outline the commitments that were made to you
upon joining the Central Freight Lines Team.

A Central Freight Lines, Texas Corporation (Texas Corporation) and a Central
Freight Lines, a Nevada Corporation (Nevada Corporation) exist. The Texas
Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Nevada Corporation. You are
being hired to be the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of both these entities.

Your starting date will be June 10, 2002 and your starting base annual salary
will be $150,000.00. Upon board of director approval, you will be granted
100,000 stock options in the Nevada Corporation, which will vest 20% per year
over 5 years. The grant date will be your date of hire (June 10, 2002).

If your employment is involuntarily terminated for anything other than gross
misconduct or you voluntarily terminate your employment because 1) your duties
as CFO of either or both of the corporations listed above are materially
reduced, 2) your base salary is lowered below its then current level, 3) other
benefits are materially reduced, or 4) you are required to involuntarily
relocate from the Phoenix, Arizona area, you will be paid a lump sum payment
equal to your then current annual salary. The lump sum payment will be paid
within 10 days of your termination date.

Any reasonable legal expense on behalf of either party in connection with this
agreement will be paid by the Texas Corporation.

We are enthusiastic about our future together and look forward to your written
acceptance by signing below.

/s/ Robert V. Fasso
Bob Fasso
CEO
Central Freight Lines, Inc. (Nevada)
Central Freight Lines, Inc. (Texas)


Agreed:

/s/ Jeffrey A. Hale                          Date: June 7, 2002
-------------------------
Jeffrey A. Hale
No. 60347.

protests 275425-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros. (A Div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc.) et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Human Pheromone Sciences, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William P. Horgan and Gregory S. Fredrick certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ William P. Horgan

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

November 12, 2007



/s/ Gregory S. Fredrick

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

November 12, 2007







23
***IL.-i9~Za/~**

' 

### /dp)Cfc; -a)

### -u~ 

### r 

## <**·~.~~~~~.=.::...;:___~~~~~¥e_~et__LL\s~C~ecl-!<** -**~d**I

### ~I I
No. 59905.

#### A. L. Erlanger Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 209174—K (New York).

*428Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste of rayon or other synthetic textile similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *A. L. Erlanger Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 189, C. D. 1742), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65317.

#### American Express Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 262407-K/7159, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by T.D. 51802, for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C.A.D. 669, *supra,*were held dutiable at 12% percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, *supra,*for other furniture.
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
    
 
   
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
    
 
   
The Board of Directors
    
   
Cygnet Financial Corporation:
    
 
   
     We consent to the use of our report included herein and to the reference to
our firm under the headings "Experts" and "Selected Combined Financial Data" in
the prospectus.
    
 
   
                                               /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
    
 
   
Phoenix, Arizona
    
   
July 21, 1998
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-17-00667- CV

In re State of T exas ex rel. David Escam illa, T ravis County Attor ney

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY

O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

We grant Carissa Be ene’ s motion to resc hedule the show-ca use hearing curr ently set for Nove mber 29, 2017. There fore , it is here by order ed that Carissa Bee ne shall appea r in person befor e this Court on Monday , Dec ember 4, 2017, at 1: 3 0 p.m., in the Third Court of Appea ls courtroom, located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Bu i l d i ng , 209 West 14th Street, in Austin, Travis County , T ex as, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions imposed for he r fa ilure to obey our Oc tober 12, 2017 orde r. It is so ordered N ovember 27, 2017.

Be fore J ustices Puryear , Field, a nd Bour land
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00024

- CV

P AUL B AILEY

, Appellant

V

.

D ANA C HERISSE M ICHAELIS , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law

No. 2

of Denton County ( CV

- 2021

- 04381

- JP )

March 2, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment

. It is ordered that the trial c ourt ’ s judgment

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

_________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6
 
                       [SWEENEY CONRAD, P.C. LETTERHEAD]
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this joint proxy statement and prospectus of our reports dated
March 21, 1997 on the Rabanco Companies and Regional Disposal Company 1996
financial statements included in Allied Waste Industries, Inc.'s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed August 27, 1998.
 
                                          SWEENEY CONRAD, P.C.
 
Bellevue, Washington
  August 26, 1998.
EXHIBIT 31.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert W. Pittman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.; and

2.
Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: May 11, 2018



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Pittman  
|Robert W. Pittman      
|Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.62



                                                  July 1, 1998



Arthur A. Siciliano, Ph.D.
3 Pavia Place
Framingham, MA   01701



                    Re:  Amendment of Employment Agreement
                         ---------------------------------

Dear Art,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the employment agreement dated as
of May 16, 1990, by and between you and PolyMedica Industries, Inc. (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of June 1, 1991;
December 5, 1991; March 18, 1993; March 31, 1994; April 11, 1995; April 3, 1996;
and July 1, 1997 (together, the "Employment Agreement").

         TERM OF EMPLOYMENT. The Employment Period, as defined in Section 2 of
         the Employment Agreement, is extended to May 31, 2000.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.




                                           Very truly yours,


                                           /s/ Steven J. Lee
                                           ------------------------------------ 
                                           Steven J. Lee
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:



/s/ Arthur A. Siciliano
------------------------------
Arthur A. Siciliano
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the OPM Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Sylke, OPM Human Resources, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-1048.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) (1) through (5) of title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES performance review boards. The board reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and considers recommendations to the appointing authority regarding the performance of the senior executive.

The following have been designated as members of the Fiscal Year 2023 Performance Review Board of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management:

Robert Shriver, Deputy Director, Chair

Laurie Bodenheimer, Associate Director, Healthcare and Insurance

Carmen Garcia, Chief Human Capital Officer

Veronica Hinton, Associate Director, Workforce Policy and Innovation

Jane Lee, Senior Advisor to the Director

Lisa Loss, Director, Suitability Executive Agent Programs

Webb Lyons, General Counsel

Kathryn Malague, Chief Management Officer

Margaret Pearson, Associate Director, Retirement Services

Alethea Predeoux, Chief of Staff

Office of Personnel Management.

Kayyonne Marston,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2023-23441 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-45-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                       345
<INVENTORY>                                        605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,252
<PP&E>                                         356,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 291,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,971
<BONDS>                                        166,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   291,126
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,399
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,399
<EPS-BASIC>                                      54.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    54.56


</TABLE>