alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 413 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 413

  Expressing the sense of Congress concerning cooperation between the 
  Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense in the 
                     procurement of medical items.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2000

  Mr. Everett (for himself, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Stump, and Mr. 
    Evans) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the 
Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress concerning cooperation between the 
  Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense in the 
                     procurement of medical items.

Whereas the procurement and distribution of medical items, including 
        prescription drugs, is a multibillion-dollar annual business for both 
        the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs;
Whereas those departments prescribe common high-use drugs to many of their 
        12,000,000 patients who have similar medical profiles;
Whereas the health care systems of those departments should have management 
        systems that can share and communicate clinical and management 
        information useful for both systems;
Whereas the institutional barriers separating the two departments have begun to 
        be overcome in the area of medical supplies, in part as a response to 
        recommendations by the General Accounting Office and the Commission on 
        Servicemembers and Veterans Transition Assistance; and
Whereas there is significant potential for improved savings and services by 
        improving cooperation between the two departments in the procurement and 
        management of prescription drugs, while remaining mindful that the two 
        departments have different missions: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Department of Defense and 
the Department of Veterans Affairs should increase, to the maximum 
extent consistent with their respective missions, their level of 
cooperation in the procurement and management of prescription drugs.
                                 <all>
```
A90A0347.

#### CLEVELAND v. WILLIAMSON et al.

(391 SE2d 22)

Birdsong, Judge.

Jesse Cleveland appeals from the grant of summary judgment to appellees on his complaint against them. The record shows that appellees filed pleadings in the probate court of Cleveland’s county of residence seeking to have a guardian appointed because Cleveland was an incapacitated adult. After an expert examined Cleveland and recommended that a guardian not be appointed, appellees dismissed the petition. Thereafter, Cleveland filed a complaint seeking to recover because of allegedly libelous statements contained in the petition for appointment of the guardian and because someone, not one of the appellees, smoked cigarettes and injured Cleveland’s health.

Appellees, relying on OCGA § 51-5-8, which makes privileged statements made in pleadings, moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The trial court treated the motion as one for summary judgment because it considered matters outside the record, and granted summary judgment to appellees.

Cleveland appeals contending the court erred because the complaint alleged that appellees maliciously filed the petition and because the complaint included a claim for personal injuries. Held:

1. OCGA § 51-5-8 is dispositive of Cleveland’s libel claim. Exami*477nation of Cleveland’s complaint shows that the statements he asserts were libelous were made in a pleading filed in the court of competent jurisdiction and that the statements were pertinent and material to the relief sought. By its terms, if the requirements of the code section are met, matters contained in such pleadings are privileged “[h] owe ver false and malicious [the allegedly libelous statements] may be. . . .” OCGA § 51-5-8; *Fedderwitz v. Lamb,*195 Ga. 691 (25 SE2d 414). The case of *Finish Allatoona’s Interstate Right v. Burruss,*131 Ga. App. 572 (206 SE2d 679), relied upon by appellant does not stand for the proposition he asserts. Therefore, the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment on these claims. *Garrett v. Deworken,*148 Ga. App. 656 (252 SE2d 81).

Decided February 12, 1990.

*Jesse Cleveland,*pro se.

*Robert E. Born,*for appellees.

Gaylord Cleveland, *pro se.*

2. Cleveland also alleges the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on his personal injury claim. The complaint alleges that Cleveland’s stepfather smoked cigarettes at home creating an unhealthy environment and Cleveland received injuries from inhaling the smoke. Based upon the allegations in the complaint, we cannot conclude that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to the appellees/defendants for failure to state a claim even though the trial court did not specifically address the claim in its order. Cleveland’s complaint clearly shows that Cleveland’s stepfather, the person alleged to have caused his injury, was not a party to the action. *“A*correct decision of the trial court will not be reversed, regardless of the reasons given therefor.” *National Consultants v. Burt,*186 Ga. App. 27, 33 (366 SE2d 344).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Cooper, J., concur.*
September 22, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

YUJIE REN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 16

- 00035

- CV V.

ANU RESOURCES, LLC , Appellee

_____ ___________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Anu Resources, LLC, signed January 4, 2016, was heard on the transcript of the rec ord. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Yujie Ren, to pay all costs incu rred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
600

700

42

M A R Q U E T T E D R

L A K E S H O R E D R

42

M A R Q U E T T E D R

L A K E S H O R E D R

L A K E M I C H I G A N

Kewaunee

North

Pierce

Light

Two

Creeks

Kewaunee

OE E Kewaunee

Casco Algoma

30'

44°

000

49

49

4 87° 4 000m

22'

27'

250

26

14

26

25'

49

49

4

FEET

30'

E

650

49 19

FEET 68

17

000m 4

49

49

4

30"

27'

44°

64

65

E

210

63

21

24

87°

49

49

4

25'

44°

87°

30'

22'

62

19

66

21

4 4

30"

49

49

4 4

49

49

49

49

000

22

N

16

22'

61

24

49

000m

4 30"

49

30"

22'

4 4

000mN

25

69

14

30"

000

30"

30"

49

49

4

15

25

61 62 67

16

27'

27' 2

18

49

4

20

18

FEET

2

000

4

49

4

17

66

27

69

65 70

20

63

30"

25'

FEET

44°

30'

630

25'

49

4

49

49

49

49

64

23

22

23

15

87°

49

49

4

27

67 68

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

KEWAUNEE OE E, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

KEWAUNEE OE E QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 16T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

Imagery....................................NAIP, June 2005 - July 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2005

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1998

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 18 ́

5 MILS

4° 11 ́

74 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

16T

DQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         577,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   159,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,519,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               979,000
<PP&E>                                      19,674,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,565,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,352,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,609,000
<BONDS>                                        629,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,460,000
<COMMON>                                        49,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,943,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,352,000
<SALES>                                     49,212,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       24,253,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,641,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,262,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (547,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,809,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1998             JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1997             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          75,282                  75,282
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,987,001               2,987,001
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             73,106                  73,106
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        2,209,416               2,209,416
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             34,136                  34,136
<PP&E>                                           9,514                   9,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,240,619               3,240,619
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                   3,043,843               3,043,843
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          2,204,388               2,204,388
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               2,632                   2,632
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,018                   1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,379                 115,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,240,619               3,240,619
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                3,174                   6,312
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            36,535                  70,913
<COMMISSIONS>                                   15,367                  29,254
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    6,552                  10,928
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    6,374                  13,081
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,679                  49,987
<COMPENSATION>                                  21,703                  42,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,405                  16,190
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,405                  16,190
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,390                  10,435
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53                    1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53                    1.03
        

</TABLE>
No. 54481.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. *v.*United States,

protest 147529-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Joint Proxy Statement that is made a part of the Registration Statement (Form
S-4) and related Prospectus of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. for the
registration of 47,963,682 shares of its common stock and to the incorporation
by reference therein of our report dated February 24, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of American Disposal Services, Inc. included
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
                                          Ernst & Young LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
August 27, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF  DECEMBER  31,  1998,  AND  STATEMENT  OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDING  DECEMBER 31, 1998, OF HEALTHSTAR  CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,535,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   103,580
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,557,374
<PP&E>                                       3,448,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                 827,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,229,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,032,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,385
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,594,020
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,426,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                167,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68,418
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
Before Judge Donlon,

April 26, 1967

No. R67/68.

No. R67/69.

#### Cap Sales Corporation *v.*United States,

reappraisements R61/7335 and R61/7337 (Baltimore).

#### Wilson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R62/3658, etc. (Philadelphia).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved respectively in *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147), as to merchandise appraised on the basis of export value, and *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), as to merchandise appraised on the basis of United States value, the court found and held those respective values, as defined in section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper bases for determining value of the entered canned meat products listed on schedule “B,” under the headings “Export Value” and “United States Value,” packed in container sizes identified on such schedule, and exported from' Argentina during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1959, described on the invoices of the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and stated in the entries and recited in schedule “B,” under the headings “Export Value” and “United States Value” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the schedule “B” canned meats described under the headings “Export Value” and “United States Value” and covered by these appeals for reappraisement, schedule “B” being attached to and made a part of the decisions.
# L_2022165EN.01002901.xml

| 21.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/29

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/958

of 14 June 2022

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Äkta Gränna Polkagrisar’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Äkta Gränna Polkagrisar’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Äkta Gränna Polkagrisar’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Äkta Gränna Polkagrisar’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Äkta Gränna Polkagrisar’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Äkta Gränna Polkagrisar’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.3. Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 87, 23.2.2022, p. 16.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---