alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-                      -                        -  关于我们 
                      - 新闻与多媒体
                      -  新闻与多媒体 
                      -  活动 
                      -  博客 
                      -  事实简介 
                      -  FEMA直播 
                      -  移动端产品 
                      -  新闻通讯 
                      -  新闻发布 
                      -  播客 
                      -  社交媒体 
                      -  关于我们 
                      -  报告与数据 
                      -  FEMA在行动 

          This page has not been translated into 简体中文. Visit the 简体中文 page for resources in that language.        

# 2024 Resilient Nation Partnership Network Forum

                            - English 

Join us online every Thursday from 1-3 p.m. Eastern Time in April for the Resilient Nation Partnership Network (RNPN) 2024 Partnership Forum co-hosted with the Sundance Institute. This year’s theme is “Stories of Resilience: Voices that Inspire.” 

**日期:**2024-02-26T14:00:002024-04-25T19:00:00四月 25, 2024二月 26, 2024 - 四月 25, 2024

**时间:**2:00 pm - 7:00 pm

**位置:**虚拟

Register

## 活动详情

During the Partnership Forum, we discuss topics across resilience and mitigation. By convening experts who represent all facets of the Whole Community, the Forum is a chance to discuss complex challenges facing our nation; share lessons learned, best practices, and personal stories; and work together on innovative ideas to advance natural hazard resilience.

The RNPN and Sundance Institute will explore how stories can build community resilience during this year’s forum on “Stories of Resilience: Voices that Inspire.” The Forum will bring filmmakers, artists, and community leaders together to show how stories inspire behavioral change, boost empathy, and imagine different futures.

**Topics each Thursday in April**

**Times: 1-3 p.m. Eastern Time**

Attendees will hear from diverse speakers about community-led resilience. The series will cover these topics:

**April 4 –** Rising Tides, Rising Divides: Climate and Equity in the Built Environment 

**April 11 –** Building Resilient Agriculture: Lessons from Island Communities

**April 18 –** Extreme Heat: Reflecting on the Hottest Summer to Date

**April 25 –** Tribal Migration: Adapting to Climate Hazards

## 活动联系人

FEMA-ResilientNation@fema.dhs.gov

返回顶部
Before the Second Division,

December 28, 1950

No. 55053.

#### Walter Kocher et al. *v.*United States,

protests 111516-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as watch movements more than *%0*of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
A90A0069.

#### WAITS v. THE STATE.

(390 SE2d 296)

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Charles Waits, was convicted of driving a car on August 17, 1988, after having been declared a habitual violator. The only issue on appeal concerns the validity of the notice and service of the notice of declaration of habitual violator and revocation.

The Department of Public Safety had issued official notices of revocation on February 7, 1986, and on August 9, 1985, but was unsuccessful in its attempted service by certified mail. On May 15, 1987, Waits was arrested in Gwinnett County and charged with DUI. A Gwinnett County police officer, after discovering that Waits had previously been declared a habitual violator but had not been served, completed a Department of Public Safety official notice of revocation, purporting to provide the same notice as that attempted on February 7, 1986. (The officer apparently erred in indicating a revocation date of February 4, 1986.) The officer read the notice to Waits, who in turn refused to sign it, and this service and refusal was witnessed by another Gwinnett County police officer. There was no evidence that Waits did not understand this notice. The form was then returned to the Department of Public Safety. Waits denied this occurrence.

We find this personal service sufficient to satisfy the intent and notice requirements‘of OCGA § 40-5-58 (b). Cf. *Cooper v. State,*156 Ga. App. 108 (274 SE2d 112) (1980); *Wellons v. State,*152 Ga. App. 523 (263 SE2d 212) (1979); see also *Stowe v. State,*176 Ga. App. 169, 171 (335 SE2d 431) (1985). Waits’ testimony that the Gwinnett officers never read or otherwise gave him the habitual violator notice *285merely presented a factual question for jury resolution.

Decided January 22, 1990.

*John D. McCord III,*for appellant.

*Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Robert E. Statham III, Desiree L. Sutton, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. Pintsopoulos
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                February
      22, 2011
Before the Second Division,

July 20, 1951

No. 55773.

protest 988478-G (San Francisco).

#### How Kee & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF SALESLOGIX CORPORATION
 
Opis SupportExpress, Inc., an Arizona subsidiary
 
SalesLogix International, Inc., an Arizona subsidiary
 
SalesLogix Europe Ltd., United Kingdom subsidiary
 
   
Enact Incorporated, formerly known as SLX Meger Company, an Arizona subsidiary
No. 54467.

#### Wing Chong Lung Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 987580-G, etc. (Los Angeles and Seattle).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 85

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

should be reformed by April 15, 2002, in a manner that protects the

Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, that is revenue neutral,

and that results in a fair and less complicated tax code.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1999

Mr. BOYD (for himself, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. TANNER, Mr.

MINGE, and Mrs. THURMAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Internal Revenue

Code of 1986 should be reformed by April 15, 2002,

in a manner that protects the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, that is revenue neutral, and that

results in a fair and less complicated tax code.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is too

6 complicated for the average citizen to understand;
2

HCON 85 IH

1 (2) honest taxpayers spend millions of dollars

2 and countless hours completing tax forms; and

3 (3) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is rid4 dled with loopholes that benefit special interests at

5 the expense of other taxpayers.

6 SEC. 2. REFORM OF TAX CODE.

7 (a) DEADLINE.—It is the sense of the Congress that

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 should be reformed

9 not later than April 15, 2002.

10 (b) GUIDELINES.—In developing a new tax code, the

11 following guidelines should be used:

12 (1) Reform of the Internal Revenue Code of

13 1986 must ensure adequate funding of the Federal

14 Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, the

15 Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and the

16 Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund for current

17 recipients and future retirees.

18 (2) Such reform must result in a tax code that

19 is revenue neutral. No changes should be made that

20 would result in deficit spending.

21 (3) Such reform must result in a tax code that

22 is fair. All Americans should be treated fairly under

23 a new tax code.

24 (4) Such reform should promote economic

25 growth by encouraging savings and investment.
3

HCON 85 IH

1 (5) Such reform must result in a tax code that

2 is less complicated. It should take less time for the

3 average American to complete his tax return under

4 a new tax code than is required under the Internal

5 Revenue Code of 1986.

Æ
Before the Second Division,

March 17, 1960

No. 63972.

protests 315877-K, etc. (New York).

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of key-driven calculating machines and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C.C.P.A. 160, C.A.D. 655), the claim at 11% percent under the provision in paragraph 372, as modified by T.D. 54108, for calculating machines specially constructed for multiplying and dividing and parts thereof was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of C.A.D. 655, *supra,*except for having, in addition, an electric motor as an essential feature, were held dutiable at 11% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 54108, for calculating machines specially constructed for multiplying and dividing, having an electric motor as an essential feature and parts thereof.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 118 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.118

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``October 29, 2000''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 69372.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/1083 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass balls with chenille or foil stems similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Joseph Markovits, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 151, C.D. 2216), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### EO 12866 Review: Response to Interagency Comments on 2012 MeBr NPRM (2060-AQ83) Jeremy Arling to: Frey, Nathan J. 08/18/2011 04:59 PM Cc: David Donaldson, Cindy Newberg, JohnB Chamberlin

Nathan

Here is our response to the comments raised on today's call. In addition, please note some non-substantive edits made on page 30 intended to clarify that discussion.

EO12866MethylBromideCUE2060-AQ83NPRM20110818v2.docx Jeremy Arling U.S. EPA Stratospheric Protection Division Office of Atmospheric Programs Mail Code: 6205J 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460-0001 202-343-9055 202-343-2338 (f) arling. jeremy @epa.gov
No. 68568.

protests 60/24036, 60/31256, and 60/31262 (San Francisco).

#### James S. Baker (Imports) Co., Inc., and Ted L. Rausch *v.*United States,

*356Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of jacks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63676, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 59383.

protest 171694-K (Ogdensburg).

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper stock similar in all material respects to that the subject of *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1470), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## NO. 12

- 1 3

- 00 141

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD JAMES JOHNSO N , § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
ALBERT J. CHARANZA, JR. , APPELLE

ES § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The order of dismissal in this case was signed on April 12, 2013. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment

. On April 29, 2013, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of app eal on or before May 29, 2013, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not corrected his defective notice of appeal. Accordin gly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg , No. 12

- 04

- 00004

- CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.

- Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied) (mem. op.) ; Feist v. Hubert
, No. 12

- 03

- 00442

- CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.

- Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied) (mem. op.)

. Opinion delivered June 19 , 2013. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 19 , 2013

NO. 12

- 13

- 00141

- CV

RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
,

Appellant V. ALBERT J. CHARANZA, JR.
,

Appellee

Appeal from the 159 th Judicial Di strict Court of Angelina County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 43285

- 10

- 07

- A )

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDG ED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court
below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. , and Hoyle , J.
No. 63955.

protests 58/7617, etc. (St. Albans).

#### W. A. Gleeson et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add service(s) to the 
Procurement List that will be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: November 19, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit 
comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785-6404, or 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#185b554c5d5e7d7c4a7d7f58597a7174716c6157767d367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8ebe5fcedeecdccfacdcfe8e9cac1c4c1dcd1e7c6cd86cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the service(s) listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following service(s) are proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Service(s)

Service Type: Contractor Operated Parts Store
Mandatory for: Offsite Contractor Operated Parts Store (COPARS), 
Best Work Industries for the Blind, Cherry Hill, NJ
Designated Source of Supply: BESTWORK INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC, 
Cherry Hill, NJ
Contracting Activity: DEPT OF THE NAVY, NAVAIR WARFARE CTR AIRCRAFT 
DIV LKE

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023-23245 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of Highbury
Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned hereby certify that, to the best
of the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant for the period certified.





Date:
March 4, 2009


By:
              /s/ Richard S. FooteRichard
      S. FootePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)By:
              /s/ R. Bradley ForthR.
      Bradley ForthExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand
      Secretary(Principal
      Financial Officer)





The
foregoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-K. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to Highbury Financial Inc. and will be retained
by Highbury Financial Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
eXHIBIT 10.18


third amendment to the

harman international industries, incorporated

retirement savings plan


WHEREAS, Harman International Industries, Incorporated (the "Employer") maintains the Harman International Industries, Incorporated Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective as of June 27, 2000
(the "Plan"), and may amend the Plan pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan;


WHEREAS, the Plan desires to amend the Plan in certain respects as requested by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") in connection with the pending application for a favorable determination letter filed with the
IRS on May 15, 2002;


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Employer has resolved that the Plan shall be amended to reflect these intentions.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective June 27, 1997, to read as follows:


1.         Section 1.1(n) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the second sentence thereof and inserting in lieu thereof the following:


"Employee" shall include leased employees.  For purposes of this Section 1.1(n), a “leased employee” means any person who, pursuant to an agreement between an Affiliated Employer and any other person
(“leasing organization”), has performed services for the Affiliated Employer on a substantially full‐time basis for a period of at least one year and such services are performed under the primary direction or control of the Affiliated
Employer.  Contributions or benefits provided a leased employee by the leasing organization which are attributable to services performed for an Affiliated Employer will be treated as provided by the Affiliated Employer.


2.         Section 5.5(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


     (a)  The amounts credited to a Participant under the Plan shall not exceed the limitations of Code Section 415(c) and the regulations thereunder, the provisions of which are incorporated by
reference.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has executed this Amendment on the 12th day of September, 2003.


HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED


By: /s/ Frank
Meredith                                           

       Name:  Frank Meredith

      Title:    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 111 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 111

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275 is 
further amended by striking ``October 14, 2000'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``October 20, 2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 111

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.
```