# Official Journal L 102/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.102.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 102 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5416 April 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.102.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 102

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5416 April 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 370/2011 of 11 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund, as regards the European External Action Service | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 of 15 April 2011 concerning the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt as feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation Taminco N.V.) (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2011 of 15 April 2011 fixing the quantitative limit for exports of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose until the end of the 2011/2012 marketing year | 8 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 373/2011 of 15 April 2011 concerning the authorisation of the preparation of Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789 as a feed additive for minor avian species except laying birds, weaned piglets and minor porcine species (weaned) and amending Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 (holder of authorisation Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, represented by Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U.) (
  1
  ) | 10 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 374/2011 of 11 April 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farina di castagne della Lunigiana (PDO)) | 13 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 375/2011 of 11 April 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Formaggella del Luinese (PDO)) | 15 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 376/2011 of 15 April 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 17 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 377/2011 of 15 April 2011 on selling prices for cereals in response to the 10th individual invitations to tender within the tendering procedures opened by Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010 | 19 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 378/2011 of 15 April 2011 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 April 2011 | 21 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Implementing Directive 2011/47/EU of 15 April 2011 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include aluminium sulphate as active substance and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC (
  1
  ) | 24 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Directive 2011/48/EU of 15 April 2011 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include bromadiolone as active substance and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC (
  1
  ) | 28 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/243/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 11 April 2011 appointing one Italian member of the Committee of the Regions | 32 |
| | | 2011/244/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 15 April 2011 of excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2011) 2517) | 33 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 370/2011 of 11 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund, as regards the European External Action Service

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 of 15 April 2011 concerning the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt as feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation Taminco N.V.) (
  1
  )

1

6

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2011 of 15 April 2011 fixing the quantitative limit for exports of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose until the end of the 2011/2012 marketing year

8

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 373/2011 of 15 April 2011 concerning the authorisation of the preparation of Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789 as a feed additive for minor avian species except laying birds, weaned piglets and minor porcine species (weaned) and amending Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 (holder of authorisation Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, represented by Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U.) (
  1
  )

Clostridium butyricum

1

10

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 374/2011 of 11 April 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farina di castagne della Lunigiana (PDO))

13

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 375/2011 of 11 April 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Formaggella del Luinese (PDO))

15

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 376/2011 of 15 April 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

17

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 377/2011 of 15 April 2011 on selling prices for cereals in response to the 10th individual invitations to tender within the tendering procedures opened by Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010

19

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 378/2011 of 15 April 2011 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 April 2011

21

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Implementing Directive 2011/47/EU of 15 April 2011 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include aluminium sulphate as active substance and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC (
  1
  )

1

24

*

Commission Implementing Directive 2011/48/EU of 15 April 2011 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include bromadiolone as active substance and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC (
  1
  )

1

28

DECISIONS

2011/243/EU

*

Council Decision of 11 April 2011 appointing one Italian member of the Committee of the Regions

32

2011/244/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 15 April 2011 of excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2011) 2517)

(notified under document C(2011) 2517)

33

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus ( OJ L 28, 2.2.2011 ) | 44 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector ( OJ L 254, 26.9.2009 ) | 44 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus ( OJ L 28, 2.2.2011 )

( OJ L 28, 2.2.2011 )

44

*

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector ( OJ L 254, 26.9.2009 )

( OJ L 254, 26.9.2009 )

44

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/1

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No 370/2011

of 11 April 2011

amending Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund, as regards the European External Action Service

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 217 thereof,

Having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (1) as last amended in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, on 22 June 2010 (2),

Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the financing of Community aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2008 to 2013 in accordance with the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the EC Treaty applies (3) (‘the Internal Agreement’) and in particular Article 10(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the Court of Auditors (4),

Having consulted the European Investment Bank,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 (5), lays down the rules for the establishment and financial implementation of the resources of the 10th European Development Fund (hereinafter ‘EDF’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 (5), lays down the rules for the establishment and financial implementation of the resources of the 10th European Development Fund (hereinafter ‘EDF’).

| (2) | The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter ‘EEAS’). In order to take into account the establishment of the EEAS, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (6) (hereinafter the ‘Financial Regulation’) has been amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7). In order to provide for a stable legal framework for the implementation of the EDF and to take into account the establishment of the EEAS and amendments to the Financial Regulation, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EC) No 215/2008. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter ‘EEAS’). In order to take into account the establishment of the EEAS, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (6) (hereinafter the ‘Financial Regulation’) has been amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7). In order to provide for a stable legal framework for the implementation of the EDF and to take into account the establishment of the EEAS and amendments to the Financial Regulation, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EC) No 215/2008.

| (3) | According to Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (8), the EEAS is a service of a sui generis nature and should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

According to Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (8), the EEAS is a service of a sui generis nature and should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation.

| (4) | The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that Commission Delegations will become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. It is necessary to ensure the continuity of the functioning of Union Delegations and in particular the continuity and efficiency in the management of EDF resources by the Delegations. Therefore the Commission should be authorised to sub-delegate its powers of implementation of EDF resources to Heads of Union Delegations belonging to EEAS as a separate institution. The authorising officers by delegation should continue to be responsible for the definition of internal management and control systems, while the Heads of Union Delegations should be responsible for the adequate setting up and functioning of internal management and control systems and for the management of the funds and the operations carried out within their Delegations. They should report twice a year to that effect. It is appropriate to provide for withdrawal of such delegation in accordance with the rules applicable to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that Commission Delegations will become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. It is necessary to ensure the continuity of the functioning of Union Delegations and in particular the continuity and efficiency in the management of EDF resources by the Delegations. Therefore the Commission should be authorised to sub-delegate its powers of implementation of EDF resources to Heads of Union Delegations belonging to EEAS as a separate institution. The authorising officers by delegation should continue to be responsible for the definition of internal management and control systems, while the Heads of Union Delegations should be responsible for the adequate setting up and functioning of internal management and control systems and for the management of the funds and the operations carried out within their Delegations. They should report twice a year to that effect. It is appropriate to provide for withdrawal of such delegation in accordance with the rules applicable to the Commission.

| (5) | In order to comply with the principle of sound financial management, Heads of Union Delegations, when acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation, should apply the Commission rules and should be subject to the same duties, obligations and accountability as any other authorising officers by sub-delegation. For those purposes, they should also refer to the Commission as their institution. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In order to comply with the principle of sound financial management, Heads of Union Delegations, when acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation, should apply the Commission rules and should be subject to the same duties, obligations and accountability as any other authorising officers by sub-delegation. For those purposes, they should also refer to the Commission as their institution.

| (6) | In the context of discharge, given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the EEAS should be fully subject to the procedures provided for in Articles 142, 143 and 144 of Regulation (EC) No 215/2008. The EEAS should fully cooperate with institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, any additional necessary information, including through attendance at meetings of the relevant bodies. The Commission should remain responsible, in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 215/2008, for the implementation of EDF resources, including for EDF resources implemented by Heads of Union Delegations who are authorising officers by sub-delegation. In order to allow the Commission to fulfil its responsibilities, the Heads of Union Delegations should provide the necessary information. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (hereinafter the ‘High Representative’) should be informed at the same time and should facilitate the cooperation between Union Delegations and Commission departments. Given the novelty of this structure, high standard provisions on transparency and financial accountability need to be applied. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

In the context of discharge, given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the EEAS should be fully subject to the procedures provided for in Articles 142, 143 and 144 of Regulation (EC) No 215/2008. The EEAS should fully cooperate with institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, any additional necessary information, including through attendance at meetings of the relevant bodies. The Commission should remain responsible, in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 215/2008, for the implementation of EDF resources, including for EDF resources implemented by Heads of Union Delegations who are authorising officers by sub-delegation. In order to allow the Commission to fulfil its responsibilities, the Heads of Union Delegations should provide the necessary information. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (hereinafter the ‘High Representative’) should be informed at the same time and should facilitate the cooperation between Union Delegations and Commission departments. Given the novelty of this structure, high standard provisions on transparency and financial accountability need to be applied.

| (7) | The accounting officer of the Commission should remain responsible for the entire implementation of EDF resources, including accounting operations relating to EDF resources sub-delegated to Heads of Union Delegations. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The accounting officer of the Commission should remain responsible for the entire implementation of EDF resources, including accounting operations relating to EDF resources sub-delegated to Heads of Union Delegations.

| (8) | In order to ensure coherence and equality of treatment between authorising officers by sub-delegation who are EEAS staff and those who are Commission staff, and to ensure that the Commission is properly informed, the special financial irregularities panel of the Commission should also be responsible for handling irregularities within the EEAS where the Commission has sub-delegated implementation powers to Heads of Union Delegations. Nevertheless, in order to maintain the link between financial management responsibility and disciplinary action, the Commission should be entitled to request the High Representative to initiate proceedings if the panel finds irregularities concerning those competencies of the Commission sub-delegated to the Heads of Union Delegations. In such a case the High Representative should take the appropriate action in accordance with the Staff Regulations. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In order to ensure coherence and equality of treatment between authorising officers by sub-delegation who are EEAS staff and those who are Commission staff, and to ensure that the Commission is properly informed, the special financial irregularities panel of the Commission should also be responsible for handling irregularities within the EEAS where the Commission has sub-delegated implementation powers to Heads of Union Delegations. Nevertheless, in order to maintain the link between financial management responsibility and disciplinary action, the Commission should be entitled to request the High Representative to initiate proceedings if the panel finds irregularities concerning those competencies of the Commission sub-delegated to the Heads of Union Delegations. In such a case the High Representative should take the appropriate action in accordance with the Staff Regulations.

| (9) | In order to ensure effective and efficient internal control Heads of Union Delegations should be subject to the verifying powers of the internal auditor of the Commission for the financial management sub-delegated to them. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

In order to ensure effective and efficient internal control Heads of Union Delegations should be subject to the verifying powers of the internal auditor of the Commission for the financial management sub-delegated to them.

| (10) | In order to ensure democratic scrutiny of the implementation of the EDF resources, Heads of Union Delegations should provide an assurance, together with a report including information on the efficiency and effectiveness of internal management and control systems in their delegation, as well as on the management of operations sub-delegated to them. The Heads of Union Delegations’ reports should be annexed to the annual activity report of the responsible authorising officer by delegation and made available to the European Parliament and the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

In order to ensure democratic scrutiny of the implementation of the EDF resources, Heads of Union Delegations should provide an assurance, together with a report including information on the efficiency and effectiveness of internal management and control systems in their delegation, as well as on the management of operations sub-delegated to them. The Heads of Union Delegations’ reports should be annexed to the annual activity report of the responsible authorising officer by delegation and made available to the European Parliament and the Council.

| (11) | Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 is amended as follows:

| (1) | in Article 14(3), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

  ‘3.   The Commission shall make available, in an appropriate manner, information on the beneficiaries of funds deriving from the EDF held by it when EDF resources are implemented on a centralised basis and directly by its departments or by Union Delegations in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, and information on the beneficiaries of funds as provided by the entities to which financial implementation tasks are delegated under other modes of management.’; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in Article 14(3), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘3.   The Commission shall make available, in an appropriate manner, information on the beneficiaries of funds deriving from the EDF held by it when EDF resources are implemented on a centralised basis and directly by its departments or by Union Delegations in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, and information on the beneficiaries of funds as provided by the entities to which financial implementation tasks are delegated under other modes of management.’;

| (2) | in Article 17, the following paragraphs are added:
  ‘However, the Commission may delegate its powers to implement EDF resources to the Heads of Union Delegations. It shall, at the same time, inform the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (High Representative) thereof. When Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation, they shall apply the Commission rules for the implementation of EDF resources and shall be submitted to the same duties, obligations and accountability as any other authorising officer by sub-delegation.
  The Commission may withdraw that delegation in accordance with its own rules.
  For the purposes of the second paragraph, the High Representative shall take the measures necessary to facilitate the cooperation between Union Delegations and Commission departments.
  Detailed arrangements may be agreed between the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) in order to facilitate the implementation by Union Delegations of the resources foreseen for support expenditure linked to the EDF under Article 6 of the Internal Agreement. Those arrangements shall not contain any derogation from the provisions of this Regulation.’; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

in Article 17, the following paragraphs are added:

‘However, the Commission may delegate its powers to implement EDF resources to the Heads of Union Delegations. It shall, at the same time, inform the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (High Representative) thereof. When Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation, they shall apply the Commission rules for the implementation of EDF resources and shall be submitted to the same duties, obligations and accountability as any other authorising officer by sub-delegation.

The Commission may withdraw that delegation in accordance with its own rules.

For the purposes of the second paragraph, the High Representative shall take the measures necessary to facilitate the cooperation between Union Delegations and Commission departments.

Detailed arrangements may be agreed between the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) in order to facilitate the implementation by Union Delegations of the resources foreseen for support expenditure linked to the EDF under Article 6 of the Internal Agreement. Those arrangements shall not contain any derogation from the provisions of this Regulation.’;

| (3) | in Article 25(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   Where the Commission implements EDF resources on a centralised basis, implementation tasks shall be performed either directly, by its departments or by Union Delegations in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, or indirectly, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this Article and with Articles 26 to 29.’; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

in Article 25(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘1.   Where the Commission implements EDF resources on a centralised basis, implementation tasks shall be performed either directly, by its departments or by Union Delegations in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, or indirectly, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this Article and with Articles 26 to 29.’;

| (4) | in Article 32, the following paragraph is added:

  ‘5.   Where Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, they shall be subject to the Commission as the institution responsible for the definition, exercise, control and appraisal of their duties and responsibilities as authorising officers by sub-delegation. The Commission shall, at the same time, inform the High Representative thereof.’; |
| --- | --- |

(4)

in Article 32, the following paragraph is added:

‘5.   Where Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, they shall be subject to the Commission as the institution responsible for the definition, exercise, control and appraisal of their duties and responsibilities as authorising officers by sub-delegation. The Commission shall, at the same time, inform the High Representative thereof.’;

| (5) | in Article 38, second paragraph, the following sentence is added:

  ‘The annual activity reports of the authorising officers by delegation shall also be made available to the European Parliament and the Council.’; |
| --- | --- |

(5)

in Article 38, second paragraph, the following sentence is added:

‘The annual activity reports of the authorising officers by delegation shall also be made available to the European Parliament and the Council.’;

| (6) | the following Article is inserted:

  ‘Article 38a

  1.   Where Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, they shall cooperate closely with the Commission for the proper implementation of the funds, in order to ensure, in particular, the legality and regularity of financial transactions, the respect of the principle of sound financial management in the management of the funds and the effective protection of the financial interests of the Union.
  To this effect, they shall take the measures necessary to prevent any situation susceptible to put at stake the responsibility of the Commission for the implementation of EDF resources sub-delegated to them as well as any conflict of priorities which is likely to have an impact on the implementation of the financial management tasks sub-delegated to them.
  Where a situation or conflict of the type referred to in the second subparagraph arises, the Heads of Union Delegations shall inform the responsible Directors-General of the Commission and of the EEAS thereof without delay. Those Directors-General shall take appropriate steps to remedy the situation.


  2.   If Heads of Union Delegations find themselves in a situation referred to in Article 37(4), they shall refer the matter to the specialised financial irregularities panel set up pursuant to Article 54(3). In the event of any illegal activity, fraud or corruption which may harm the interests of the Union, they shall inform the authorities and bodies designated by the applicable legislation.


  3.   Heads of Union Delegations acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17 shall report to their authorising officer by delegation so that the latter can integrate their reports in his annual activity report referred to in Article 38. The reports of the Heads of Union Delegations shall include information on the efficiency and effectiveness of internal management and control systems put in place in their Delegation, as well as on the management of operations sub-delegated to them, and provide the assurance pursuant to Article 54(2a). These reports shall be annexed to the annual activity report of the authorising officer by delegation, and shall be made available to the European Parliament and the Council taking into account, where appropriate, their confidentiality.
  The Heads of Union Delegations shall fully cooperate with institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, any additional necessary information. In this context, they may be requested to attend meetings of the relevant bodies and assist the responsible authorising officer by delegation.


  4.   Heads of Union Delegations acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17 shall reply to any request by the authorising officer by delegation at its own request or, in the context of discharge, at the request of the European Parliament.


  5.   The Commission shall ensure that sub-delegating powers are not detrimental to the discharge procedure, in accordance with Articles 142, 143 and 144.’; |
| --- | --- |

(6)

the following Article is inserted:

‘Article 38a

1.   Where Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, they shall cooperate closely with the Commission for the proper implementation of the funds, in order to ensure, in particular, the legality and regularity of financial transactions, the respect of the principle of sound financial management in the management of the funds and the effective protection of the financial interests of the Union.

To this effect, they shall take the measures necessary to prevent any situation susceptible to put at stake the responsibility of the Commission for the implementation of EDF resources sub-delegated to them as well as any conflict of priorities which is likely to have an impact on the implementation of the financial management tasks sub-delegated to them.

Where a situation or conflict of the type referred to in the second subparagraph arises, the Heads of Union Delegations shall inform the responsible Directors-General of the Commission and of the EEAS thereof without delay. Those Directors-General shall take appropriate steps to remedy the situation.

2.   If Heads of Union Delegations find themselves in a situation referred to in Article 37(4), they shall refer the matter to the specialised financial irregularities panel set up pursuant to Article 54(3). In the event of any illegal activity, fraud or corruption which may harm the interests of the Union, they shall inform the authorities and bodies designated by the applicable legislation.

3.   Heads of Union Delegations acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17 shall report to their authorising officer by delegation so that the latter can integrate their reports in his annual activity report referred to in Article 38. The reports of the Heads of Union Delegations shall include information on the efficiency and effectiveness of internal management and control systems put in place in their Delegation, as well as on the management of operations sub-delegated to them, and provide the assurance pursuant to Article 54(2a). These reports shall be annexed to the annual activity report of the authorising officer by delegation, and shall be made available to the European Parliament and the Council taking into account, where appropriate, their confidentiality.

The Heads of Union Delegations shall fully cooperate with institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, any additional necessary information. In this context, they may be requested to attend meetings of the relevant bodies and assist the responsible authorising officer by delegation.

4.   Heads of Union Delegations acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17 shall reply to any request by the authorising officer by delegation at its own request or, in the context of discharge, at the request of the European Parliament.

5.   The Commission shall ensure that sub-delegating powers are not detrimental to the discharge procedure, in accordance with Articles 142, 143 and 144.’;

| (7) | in Article 39(1) the following subparagraph is added:
  ‘The accounting officer of the Commission shall remain responsible for the entire implementation of EDF resources, including accounting operations relating to EDF resources sub-delegated to Heads of Union Delegations.’; |
| --- | --- |

(7)

in Article 39(1) the following subparagraph is added:

‘The accounting officer of the Commission shall remain responsible for the entire implementation of EDF resources, including accounting operations relating to EDF resources sub-delegated to Heads of Union Delegations.’;

| (8) | Article 54 is amended as follows:






  (a) | the following paragraph is inserted:

  ‘2a.   In the event of sub-delegation to the Heads of Union Delegations, the authorising officer by delegation shall be responsible for the definition of the internal management and control systems put in place, their efficiency and effectiveness. The Heads of Union Delegations shall be responsible for the adequate setting up and functioning of those systems, in accordance with the instructions of the authorising officer by delegation, and for the management of the funds and the operations they carry out within the Union Delegation under their responsibility. Before taking up their duties, they must complete specific training courses on the tasks and responsibilities of authorising officers and the implementation of EDF resources, in accordance with Article 37(3).
  Heads of Union Delegations shall report on their responsibilities pursuant to the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Article 38a(3).
  Each year, Heads of Union Delegations provide to the authorising officer by delegation the assurance on the internal management and control systems put in place in their Delegation, as well as on the management of operations sub-delegated to them and the results thereof, in order to allow the authorising officer to establish his statement of assurance, as provided for in Article 38.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(8)

Article 54 is amended as follows:

(a)

the following paragraph is inserted:

‘2a.   In the event of sub-delegation to the Heads of Union Delegations, the authorising officer by delegation shall be responsible for the definition of the internal management and control systems put in place, their efficiency and effectiveness. The Heads of Union Delegations shall be responsible for the adequate setting up and functioning of those systems, in accordance with the instructions of the authorising officer by delegation, and for the management of the funds and the operations they carry out within the Union Delegation under their responsibility. Before taking up their duties, they must complete specific training courses on the tasks and responsibilities of authorising officers and the implementation of EDF resources, in accordance with Article 37(3).

Heads of Union Delegations shall report on their responsibilities pursuant to the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Article 38a(3).

Each year, Heads of Union Delegations provide to the authorising officer by delegation the assurance on the internal management and control systems put in place in their Delegation, as well as on the management of operations sub-delegated to them and the results thereof, in order to allow the authorising officer to establish his statement of assurance, as provided for in Article 38.’;

| (b) | the following paragraph is added:

  ‘4.   Where Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, the specialised financial irregularities panel set up by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article shall be competent for cases referred to in that paragraph 3.
  If the panel detects systemic problems, it shall send a report with recommendations to the authorising officer, the High Representative and to the authorising officer by delegation, provided the latter is not the person involved, as well as to the internal auditor.
  On the basis of the opinion of the panel, the Commission may request the High Representative to initiate, in the High Representative’s capacity as appointing authority, proceedings entailing liability to disciplinary action or to payment of compensation against authorising officers by sub-delegation if irregularities concern the competencies of the Commission sub-delegated to them. In such a case the High Representative will take appropriate action in accordance with the Staff Regulations in order to enforce decisions on disciplinary action and/or the payment of compensation, as recommended by the Commission.
  The Member States shall fully support the Union in the enforcement of any liability under Article 22 of the Staff Regulations of temporary staff to whom Article 2, point (e), of the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the Communities applies.’; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the following paragraph is added:

‘4.   Where Heads of Union Delegations act as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17, the specialised financial irregularities panel set up by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article shall be competent for cases referred to in that paragraph 3.

If the panel detects systemic problems, it shall send a report with recommendations to the authorising officer, the High Representative and to the authorising officer by delegation, provided the latter is not the person involved, as well as to the internal auditor.

On the basis of the opinion of the panel, the Commission may request the High Representative to initiate, in the High Representative’s capacity as appointing authority, proceedings entailing liability to disciplinary action or to payment of compensation against authorising officers by sub-delegation if irregularities concern the competencies of the Commission sub-delegated to them. In such a case the High Representative will take appropriate action in accordance with the Staff Regulations in order to enforce decisions on disciplinary action and/or the payment of compensation, as recommended by the Commission.

The Member States shall fully support the Union in the enforcement of any liability under Article 22 of the Staff Regulations of temporary staff to whom Article 2, point (e), of the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the Communities applies.’;

| (9) | in Article 89, the following paragraph is added:
  ‘For the purposes of the internal auditing of the EEAS, Heads of Union Delegations, acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17 shall be subject to the verifying powers of the internal auditor of the Commission for the financial management sub-delegated to them.’; |
| --- | --- |

(9)

in Article 89, the following paragraph is added:

‘For the purposes of the internal auditing of the EEAS, Heads of Union Delegations, acting as authorising officers by sub-delegation in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 17 shall be subject to the verifying powers of the internal auditor of the Commission for the financial management sub-delegated to them.’;

| (10) | the following Article is inserted:

  ‘Article 144a
  The EEAS shall be fully subject to the procedures provided for in Articles 142, 143 and 144. The EEAS shall fully cooperate with the institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, any additional necessary information, including through attendance at meetings of the relevant bodies.’. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

the following Article is inserted:

‘Article 144a

The EEAS shall be fully subject to the procedures provided for in Articles 142, 143 and 144. The EEAS shall fully cooperate with the institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, any additional necessary information, including through attendance at meetings of the relevant bodies.’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 11 April 2011.

For the Council

The President

PINTÉR S.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 287, 4.11.2010, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 247, 9.9.2006, p. 32.

3

(4)  
  OJ C 66, 1.3.2011, p. 1.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 78, 19.3.2008, p. 1.

5

(6)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

6

(7)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service, (OJ L 311, 26.11.2010, p. 9).

7

(8)  
  OJ L 201, 3.8.2010, p. 30.

8

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 371/2011

of 15 April 2011

concerning the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt as feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation Taminco N.V.)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (1), and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and for the grounds and procedures for granting such authorisation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and for the grounds and procedures for granting such authorisation.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, an application was submitted for the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt. That application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, an application was submitted for the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt. That application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (3) | The application concerns the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, to be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The application concerns the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, to be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’.

| (4) | The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 7 December 2010 (2) that dimethylglycine sodium salt, under the proposed conditions of use, does not have an adverse effect on animal health, consumer health or the environment, and that this additive has the potential to significantly improve body weight gain and feed to gain ratio in chickens for fattening. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 7 December 2010 (2) that dimethylglycine sodium salt, under the proposed conditions of use, does not have an adverse effect on animal health, consumer health or the environment, and that this additive has the potential to significantly improve body weight gain and feed to gain ratio in chickens for fattening. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (5) | The assessment of dimethylglycine sodium salt shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the use of this preparation should be authorised as specified in the Annex to this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The assessment of dimethylglycine sodium salt shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the use of this preparation should be authorised as specified in the Annex to this Regulation.

| (6) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The preparation specified in the Annex, belonging to the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’ and to the functional group ‘other zootechnical additives’, is authorised as an additive in animal nutrition subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  EFSA Journal (2011); 9(1):1950.

2

EFSA Journal (2011); 9(1):1950

---

ANNEX

| Identification number of the additive | Name of the holder of authorisation | Additive | Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method | Species or category of animal | Maximum age | Minimum content | Maximum content | Other provisions | End of period of authorisation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| mg/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 % |
| Category of zootechnical additives. Functional group: other zootechnical additives (improvement of zootechnical parameters) |
| 4d4 | Taminco N.V. | Dimethylglycine sodium salt | | Additive composition

  Dimethylglycine sodium salt with a purity of at least 97 % |

Identification number of the additive

Name of the holder of authorisation

Additive

Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method

Species or category of animal

Maximum age

Minimum content

Maximum content

Other provisions

End of period of authorisation

mg/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 %

Category of zootechnical additives. Functional group: other zootechnical additives (improvement of zootechnical parameters)

4d4

Taminco N.V.

Dimethylglycine sodium salt

Additive composition

Dimethylglycine sodium salt with a purity of at least 97 %

| | Active substance

  Sodium N,N-dimethylglycine
  C4H8NO2Na, produced by chemical synthesis. |
| --- | --- |

Active substance

Sodium N,N-dimethylglycine

C4H8NO2Na, produced by chemical synthesis.

| | Analytical methods
   (1)

  For the determination of the active substance in the additive and premixtures: liquid chromatography (HPLC) with diode array detection (DAD), detection at 193 nm.
  For the determination of the active substance in feedingstuffs: gas chromatography (GC) using pre-column derivatisation and flame ionisation detection (FID). |
| --- | --- |

Analytical methods
   (1)

For the determination of the active substance in the additive and premixtures: liquid chromatography (HPLC) with diode array detection (DAD), detection at 193 nm.

For the determination of the active substance in feedingstuffs: gas chromatography (GC) using pre-column derivatisation and flame ionisation detection (FID).

Chickens for fattening

—

1 000

| 1. | For safety: glasses and gloves shall be used during handling. |
| --- | --- |

1.

For safety: glasses and gloves shall be used during handling.

| 2. | Minimum recommended dose: 1 000  mg/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 %. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Minimum recommended dose: 1 000  mg/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 %.

6 May 2021

---

(1)  Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives: www.irmm.jrc.be/eurl-feed-additives

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/8

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 372/2011

of 15 April 2011

fixing the quantitative limit for exports of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose until the end of the 2011/2012 marketing year

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 61, first paragraph, point (d), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | According to Article 61, first paragraph, point (d) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, the sugar or isoglucose produced in excess of the quota referred to in Article 56 of that Regulation may be exported only within the quantitative limit to be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

According to Article 61, first paragraph, point (d) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, the sugar or isoglucose produced in excess of the quota referred to in Article 56 of that Regulation may be exported only within the quantitative limit to be fixed.

| (2) | Detailed implementing rules for out-of-quota exports, in particular concerning the issue of export licences are laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 (2). However, the quantitative limit should be fixed per marketing year in view of the possible opportunities on the export markets. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Detailed implementing rules for out-of-quota exports, in particular concerning the issue of export licences are laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 (2). However, the quantitative limit should be fixed per marketing year in view of the possible opportunities on the export markets.

| (3) | For certain Union producers of sugar and isoglucose, exports from the Union represent an important part of their economic activities and they have established traditional markets outside the Union. Exports of sugar and isoglucose to those markets could be economically viable also without granting export refunds. To that end it is necessary to fix a quantitative limit for out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose exports so that the EU producers concerned may continue to supply their traditional markets. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

For certain Union producers of sugar and isoglucose, exports from the Union represent an important part of their economic activities and they have established traditional markets outside the Union. Exports of sugar and isoglucose to those markets could be economically viable also without granting export refunds. To that end it is necessary to fix a quantitative limit for out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose exports so that the EU producers concerned may continue to supply their traditional markets.

| (4) | For the 2011/2012 marketing year it is estimated that fixing the quantitative limit initially at 650 000 tonnes, in white sugar equivalent, for out-of-quota sugar exports and 50 000 tonnes, in dry matter, for out-of-quota isoglucose would correspond to the market demand. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

For the 2011/2012 marketing year it is estimated that fixing the quantitative limit initially at 650 000 tonnes, in white sugar equivalent, for out-of-quota sugar exports and 50 000 tonnes, in dry matter, for out-of-quota isoglucose would correspond to the market demand.

| (5) | World market prices for sugar have been at a constant high level since October 2010 and forecasts of world market prices based on the London and New York sugar futures exchange markets indicate that world market price will remain high throughout 2011 and beyond. Therefore it is difficult to have robust estimates of the quantities that would be eventually imported into the Union. The experience gained in marketing year 2010/2011 shows that certain quantities of out-of-quota sugar had to be released on the internal market in order to ensure the appropriate supply of the Union market. Consequently, it is appropriate that out-of-quota exports are made possible as from 1 January 2012 by when more clear information would be available on the actual Union supply situation. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

World market prices for sugar have been at a constant high level since October 2010 and forecasts of world market prices based on the London and New York sugar futures exchange markets indicate that world market price will remain high throughout 2011 and beyond. Therefore it is difficult to have robust estimates of the quantities that would be eventually imported into the Union. The experience gained in marketing year 2010/2011 shows that certain quantities of out-of-quota sugar had to be released on the internal market in order to ensure the appropriate supply of the Union market. Consequently, it is appropriate that out-of-quota exports are made possible as from 1 January 2012 by when more clear information would be available on the actual Union supply situation.

| (6) | Exports of sugar from the Union to certain close destinations and to third countries granting Union products a preferential import treatment are currently in a particular favourable competitive position. In view of the absence of appropriate instruments of mutual assistance to fight against irregularities and in order to minimise the risk of fraud and to prevent any abuse associated with the re-import or reintroduction into the Union of out-of-quota sugar certain close destinations should be excluded from the eligible destinations. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Exports of sugar from the Union to certain close destinations and to third countries granting Union products a preferential import treatment are currently in a particular favourable competitive position. In view of the absence of appropriate instruments of mutual assistance to fight against irregularities and in order to minimise the risk of fraud and to prevent any abuse associated with the re-import or reintroduction into the Union of out-of-quota sugar certain close destinations should be excluded from the eligible destinations.

| (7) | In view of the estimated lower risks for eventual frauds regarding isoglucose due to the nature of the product it is not necessary to restrict the eligible destinations for the export of out-of-quota isoglucose. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In view of the estimated lower risks for eventual frauds regarding isoglucose due to the nature of the product it is not necessary to restrict the eligible destinations for the export of out-of-quota isoglucose.

| (8) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Fixing the quantitative limit for out-of-quota sugar exports

1.   For the 2011/2012 marketing year, running from 1 October 2011 to 30 September 2012, the quantitative limit referred to in Article 61, first paragraph, point (d) of Regulation (EC) 1234/2007 shall be 650 000 tonnes for exports without refund of out-of-quota white sugar falling within CN code 1701 99.

2.   Exports within the quantitative limit fixed in paragraph 1 shall be allowed for all destinations excluding:

| (a) | third countries: Andorra, Liechtenstein, the Holy See (Vatican City State), San Marino, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia (3), Montenegro, Albania and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

third countries: Andorra, Liechtenstein, the Holy See (Vatican City State), San Marino, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia (3), Montenegro, Albania and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;

| (b) | territories of Member States not forming part of the customs territory of the Union: the Faeroe Islands, Greenland, Heligoland, Ceuta, Melilla, the communes of Livigno and Campione d'Italia, and the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

territories of Member States not forming part of the customs territory of the Union: the Faeroe Islands, Greenland, Heligoland, Ceuta, Melilla, the communes of Livigno and Campione d'Italia, and the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control;

| (c) | European territories for whose external relations a Member State is responsible, not forming part of the customs territory of the Union: Gibraltar. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

European territories for whose external relations a Member State is responsible, not forming part of the customs territory of the Union: Gibraltar.

Article 2

Fixing the quantitative limit for out-of-quota isoglucose exports

1.   For the 2011/2012 marketing year, running from 1 October 2011 to 30 September 2012, the quantitative limit referred to in Article 61, first paragraph, point (d) of Regulation (EC) 1234/2007 shall be 50 000 tonnes, in dry matter, for exports without refund of out-of-quota isoglucose falling within CN codes 1702 40 10, 1702 60 10. and 1702 90 30.

2.   Exports of the products referred to in paragraph 1 shall only be allowed where they comply with the conditions laid down in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

It shall apply from 1 January 2012.

It shall expire on 30 September 2012.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 24.

2

(3)  As well as Kosovo under UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.

3

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/10

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 373/2011

of 15 April 2011

concerning the authorisation of the preparation of Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789 as a feed additive for minor avian species except laying birds, weaned piglets and minor porcine species (weaned) and amending Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 (holder of authorisation Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, represented by Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U.)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (1), and in particular Article 9(2) and Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition, for the grounds and procedures for granting such authorisation, and for the possibility to modify the authorisation of a feed additive further to a request from the holder of the authorisation and an opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (the Authority). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition, for the grounds and procedures for granting such authorisation, and for the possibility to modify the authorisation of a feed additive further to a request from the holder of the authorisation and an opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (the Authority).

| (2) | The preparation of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (FERM-P 1467) has been authorised as a feed additive for 10 years for use in chickens for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The preparation of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (FERM-P 1467) has been authorised as a feed additive for 10 years for use in chickens for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 (2).

| (3) | The applicant requested a modification of the strain designation from Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (FERM-P 1467) to Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789, and of the name of the representative of the holder of the authorisation from Mitsui & Co. Deutschland GmbH to Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U. and, in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, for a new use of this additive for minor avian species (except laying hens), weaned piglets and minor weaned porcine species, requesting that the additive be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The applicant requested a modification of the strain designation from Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (FERM-P 1467) to Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789, and of the name of the representative of the holder of the authorisation from Mitsui & Co. Deutschland GmbH to Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U. and, in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, for a new use of this additive for minor avian species (except laying hens), weaned piglets and minor weaned porcine species, requesting that the additive be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’.

| (4) | The application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, and by the relevant data to support its request. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, and by the relevant data to support its request.

| (5) | The Authority concluded in its opinion of 8 December 2010 (3) that the preparation of Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789 set out in the Annex, under the proposed conditions of use, does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment, and that this additive has the potential to improve weight gain and the efficiency of feed conversion in the target species. The Authority also concluded that the previous strain designation was not suitable for an unambiguous identification of the production strain and consequently supports the applicant’s wish to change it to Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789. The Authority concluded that the compatibility has been demonstrated for two additional coccidiostats. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Authority concluded in its opinion of 8 December 2010 (3) that the preparation of Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789 set out in the Annex, under the proposed conditions of use, does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment, and that this additive has the potential to improve weight gain and the efficiency of feed conversion in the target species. The Authority also concluded that the previous strain designation was not suitable for an unambiguous identification of the production strain and consequently supports the applicant’s wish to change it to Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789. The Authority concluded that the compatibility has been demonstrated for two additional coccidiostats. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (6) | The proposed change of the terms of the authorisation related to the name of the representative of the holder of the authorisation is purely administrative in nature and does not entail a fresh assessment of the additives concerned. The Authority was informed of the application. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The proposed change of the terms of the authorisation related to the name of the representative of the holder of the authorisation is purely administrative in nature and does not entail a fresh assessment of the additives concerned. The Authority was informed of the application.

| (7) | The assessment of the preparation shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the use of that preparation should be authorised as specified in the Annex to this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The assessment of the preparation shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the use of that preparation should be authorised as specified in the Annex to this Regulation.

| (8) | Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (9) | Since the modifications on the conditions of the authorisation are not related to safety reasons, it is appropriate to allow a transitional period for the disposal of existing stocks of the premixtures and compound feed. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Since the modifications on the conditions of the authorisation are not related to safety reasons, it is appropriate to allow a transitional period for the disposal of existing stocks of the premixtures and compound feed.

| (10) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The preparation specified in the Annex, belonging to the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’ and to the functional group ‘gut flora stabilisers’, is authorised as an additive in animal nutrition subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

In Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 the words ‘Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (FERM-P 1467)’ and the words ‘Mitsui & Co. Deutschland GmbH’ are replaced respectively by the words ‘Clostridium butyricum FERM-BP 2789’ and by the words ‘Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U’.

In point 2 of the ‘Other provisions’ column of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 the words ‘monensin sodium or lasalocid’ are added.

Article 3

Feed containing Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (FERM-P 1467) labelled in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 903/2009 may continue to be placed on the market and used until stocks are exhausted.

Article 4

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 256, 29.9.2009, p. 26.

2

(3)  
  EFSA Journal (2011); 9(1):1951.

3

EFSA Journal (2011); 9(1):1951.

---

ANNEX

| Identification number of the additive | Name of the holder of authorisation | Additive | Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method | Species or category of animal | Maximum age | Minimum content | Maximum content | Other provisions | End of period of authorisation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CFU/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 % |
| Category of zootechnical additives. Functional group: gut flora stabilisers |
| 4b1830 | Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd represented by Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U. | Clostridium butyricum

  FERM BP-2789 | | Additive composition

  Preparation of Clostridium butyricum FERM BP-2789 containing a minimum of solid form 5 × 108 CFU/g additive. |

Identification number of the additive

Name of the holder of authorisation

Additive

Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method

Species or category of animal

Maximum age

Minimum content

Maximum content

Other provisions

End of period of authorisation

CFU/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 %

Category of zootechnical additives. Functional group: gut flora stabilisers

4b1830

Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd represented by Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Europe S.L.U.

Clostridium butyricum

FERM BP-2789

Additive composition

Preparation of Clostridium butyricum FERM BP-2789 containing a minimum of solid form 5 × 108 CFU/g additive.

| | Characterisation of the active substance


  Clostridium butyricum FERM BP-2789. |
| --- | --- |

Characterisation of the active substance

Clostridium butyricum FERM BP-2789.

| | Analytical method
   (1) | Quantification: pour plate method based on ISO 15213 standard. |
| --- | --- | --- |

Analytical method
   (1)

Quantification: pour plate method based on ISO 15213 standard.

| | Identification: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) method. |
| --- | --- |

Identification: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) method.

Minor avian species (excluding laying birds).

—

5 × 108 CFU

—

| 1. | In the directions for use of the additive and premixture, indicate the storage temperature, storage life and stability to pelleting. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the directions for use of the additive and premixture, indicate the storage temperature, storage life and stability to pelleting.

| 2. | The use is allowed in feed containing the authorised coccidiostats: monensin sodium, diclazuril, maduramycin ammonium, robenidine, narasin, narasin/nicarbazin, semduramicin, decoquinate, salinomycin sodium or lasalocid sodium. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The use is allowed in feed containing the authorised coccidiostats: monensin sodium, diclazuril, maduramycin ammonium, robenidine, narasin, narasin/nicarbazin, semduramicin, decoquinate, salinomycin sodium or lasalocid sodium.

| 3. | For safety: breathing protection shall be used during the handling. |
| --- | --- |

3.

For safety: breathing protection shall be used during the handling.

6 May 2021

Piglets (weaned) and minor porcine species (weaned).

2,5 × 108 CFU

---

(1)  Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives: www.irmm.jrc.be/crl-feed-additives

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/13

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 374/2011

of 11 April 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farina di castagne della Lunigiana (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Farina di castagne della Lunigiana’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Farina di castagne della Lunigiana’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 April 2011.

For the Commission On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 220, 14.8.2010, p. 14.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Farina di castagne della Lunigiana (PDO)

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/15

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 375/2011

of 11 April 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Formaggella del Luinese (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Formaggella del Luinese’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Formaggella del Luinese’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 April 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 220, 14.8.2010, p. 18.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

ITALY

Formaggella del Luinese (PDO)

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/17

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 376/2011

of 15 April 2011

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 April 2011.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | EG | 74,4 |
| JO | 78,3 |
| MA | 54,5 |
| TN | 64,0 |
| TR | 92,2 |
| ZZ | 72,7 |
| 0707 00 05 | EG | 152,2 |
| TR | 141,9 |
| ZZ | 147,1 |
| 0709 90 70 | MA | 82,8 |
| TR | 111,5 |
| ZA | 13,0 |
| ZZ | 69,1 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 57,8 |
| IL | 74,3 |
| MA | 48,4 |
| TN | 53,5 |
| TR | 72,7 |
| ZZ | 61,3 |
| 0805 50 10 | EG | 53,5 |
| TR | 52,8 |
| ZZ | 53,2 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 80,2 |
| BR | 81,6 |
| CA | 114,9 |
| CL | 86,9 |
| CN | 113,5 |
| MK | 47,7 |
| NZ | 110,1 |
| US | 120,5 |
| UY | 57,7 |
| ZA | 81,5 |
| ZZ | 89,5 |
| 0808 20 50 | AR | 89,6 |
| CL | 108,4 |
| CN | 70,7 |
| ZA | 85,8 |
| ZZ | 88,6 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

EG

74,4

JO

78,3

MA

54,5

TN

64,0

TR

92,2

ZZ

72,7

0707 00 05

EG

152,2

TR

141,9

ZZ

147,1

0709 90 70

MA

82,8

TR

111,5

ZA

13,0

ZZ

69,1

0805 10 20

EG

57,8

IL

74,3

MA

48,4

TN

53,5

TR

72,7

ZZ

61,3

0805 50 10

EG

53,5

TR

52,8

ZZ

53,2

0808 10 80

AR

80,2

BR

81,6

CA

114,9

CL

86,9

CN

113,5

MK

47,7

NZ

110,1

US

120,5

UY

57,7

ZA

81,5

ZZ

89,5

0808 20 50

AR

89,6

CL

108,4

CN

70,7

ZA

85,8

ZZ

88,6

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/19

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 377/2011

of 15 April 2011

on selling prices for cereals in response to the 10th individual invitations to tender within the tendering procedures opened by Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 43(f), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010 (2) has opened the sales of cereals by tendering procedures, in accordance with the conditions provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 of 11 December 2009 laying down common detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards buying-in and selling of agricultural products under public intervention (3). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010 (2) has opened the sales of cereals by tendering procedures, in accordance with the conditions provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 of 11 December 2009 laying down common detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards buying-in and selling of agricultural products under public intervention (3).

| (2) | In accordance with Article 46(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 and Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010, in the light of the tenders received in response to individual invitations to tender, the Commission has to fix for each cereal and per Member State a minimum selling price or to decide not to fix a minimum selling price. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 46(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 and Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010, in the light of the tenders received in response to individual invitations to tender, the Commission has to fix for each cereal and per Member State a minimum selling price or to decide not to fix a minimum selling price.

| (3) | On the basis of the tenders received for the 10th individual invitations to tender, it has been decided that a minimum selling price should be fixed for certain cereals and for certain Member States and no minimum selling price should be fixed for other cereals and other Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the tenders received for the 10th individual invitations to tender, it has been decided that a minimum selling price should be fixed for certain cereals and for certain Member States and no minimum selling price should be fixed for other cereals and other Member States.

| (4) | In order to give a rapid signal to the market and to ensure efficient management of the measure, this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In order to give a rapid signal to the market and to ensure efficient management of the measure, this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

| (5) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 10th individual invitations to tender for selling of cereals within the tendering procedures opened by Regulation (EU) No 1017/2010, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 13 April 2011, the decisions on the selling price per cereal and Member State are set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 293, 11.11.2010, p. 41.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 349, 29.12.2009, p. 1.

3

---

ANNEX

Decisions on sales

| (EUR/tonne) |
| --- |
| Member State | The minimum selling price |
| Common wheat | Barley | Maize |
| CN code 1001 90 | CN code 1003 00 | CN code 1005 90 00 |
| Belgique/België | X | X | X |
| Bulgaria | X | X | X |
| Česká republika | X | — | X |
| Danmark | X | X | X |
| Deutschland | X | ° | X |
| Eesti | X | X | X |
| Éire/Ireland | X | X | X |
| Elláda | X | X | X |
| España | X | X | X |
| France | X | ° | X |
| Italia | X | X | X |
| Kýpros | X | X | X |
| Latvija | X | X | X |
| Lietuva | X | X | X |
| Luxembourg | X | X | X |
| Magyarország | X | X | X |
| Malta | X | X | X |
| Nederland | X | X | X |
| Österreich | X | X | X |
| Polska | X | X | X |
| Portugal | X | X | X |
| România | X | X | X |
| Slovenija | X | X | X |
| Slovensko | X | X | X |
| Suomi/Finland | X | 154,00 | X |
| Sverige | X | 173,60 | X |
| United Kingdom | X | 170,25 | X |
| — | no minimum selling price fixed (all offers rejected) |

(EUR/tonne)

Member State

The minimum selling price

Common wheat

Barley

Maize

CN code 1001 90

CN code 1003 00

CN code 1005 90 00

Belgique/België

X

X

X

Bulgaria

X

X

X

Česká republika

X

—

X

Danmark

X

X

X

Deutschland

X

°

X

Eesti

X

X

X

Éire/Ireland

X

X

X

Elláda

X

X

X

España

X

X

X

France

X

°

X

Italia

X

X

X

Kýpros

X

X

X

Latvija

X

X

X

Lietuva

X

X

X

Luxembourg

X

X

X

Magyarország

X

X

X

Malta

X

X

X

Nederland

X

X

X

Österreich

X

X

X

Polska

X

X

X

Portugal

X

X

X

România

X

X

X

Slovenija

X

X

X

Slovensko

X

X

X

Suomi/Finland

X

154,00

X

Sverige

X

173,60

X

United Kingdom

X

170,25

X

—

no minimum selling price fixed (all offers rejected)

| ° | no offers |
| --- | --- |

°

no offers

| X | no cereals available for sales |
| --- | --- |

X

no cereals available for sales

| # | not applicable |
| --- | --- |

#

not applicable

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/21

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 378/2011

of 15 April 2011

fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 April 2011

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 642/2010 of 20 July 2010 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 states that the import duty on products falling within CN codes 1001 10 00, 1001 90 91, ex 1001 90 99 (high quality common wheat), 1002, ex 1005 other than hybrid seed, and ex 1007 other than hybrids for sowing, is to be equal to the intervention price valid for such products on importation increased by 55 %, minus the cif import price applicable to the consignment in question. However, that duty may not exceed the rate of duty in the Common Customs Tariff. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 states that the import duty on products falling within CN codes 1001 10 00, 1001 90 91, ex 1001 90 99 (high quality common wheat), 1002, ex 1005 other than hybrid seed, and ex 1007 other than hybrids for sowing, is to be equal to the intervention price valid for such products on importation increased by 55 %, minus the cif import price applicable to the consignment in question. However, that duty may not exceed the rate of duty in the Common Customs Tariff.

| (2) | Article 136(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 lays down that, for the purposes of calculating the import duty referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article, representative cif import prices are to be established on a regular basis for the products in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 136(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 lays down that, for the purposes of calculating the import duty referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article, representative cif import prices are to be established on a regular basis for the products in question.

| (3) | Pursuant to Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010, the price to be used for the calculation of the import duty on products of CN codes 1001 10 00, 1001 90 91, ex 1001 90 99 (high quality common wheat), 1002 00, 1005 10 90, 1005 90 00 and 1007 00 90 is the daily cif representative import price determined as specified in Article 5 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Pursuant to Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010, the price to be used for the calculation of the import duty on products of CN codes 1001 10 00, 1001 90 91, ex 1001 90 99 (high quality common wheat), 1002 00, 1005 10 90, 1005 90 00 and 1007 00 90 is the daily cif representative import price determined as specified in Article 5 of that Regulation.

| (4) | Import duties should be fixed for the period from 16 April 2011 and should apply until new import duties are fixed and enter into force, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Import duties should be fixed for the period from 16 April 2011 and should apply until new import duties are fixed and enter into force,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

From 16 April 2011, the import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information contained in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 April 2011.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 187, 21.7.2010, p. 5.

2

---

ANNEX I

Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 16 April 2011

| CN code | Description | Import duties (1)

  (EUR/t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1001 10 00 | Durum wheat, high quality | 0,00 |
| medium quality | 0,00 |
| low quality | 0,00 |
| 1001 90 91 | Common wheat seed | 0,00 |
| ex 1001 90 99 | High quality common wheat, other than for sowing | 0,00 |
| 1002 00 00 | Rye | 0,00 |
| 1005 10 90 | Maize seed, other than hybrid | 0,00 |
| 1005 90 00 | Maize, other than seed (2) | 0,00 |
| 1007 00 90 | Grain sorghum, other than hybrids for sowing | 0,00 |

CN code

Description

Import duties (1)

(EUR/t)

1001 10 00

Durum wheat, high quality

0,00

medium quality

0,00

low quality

0,00

1001 90 91

Common wheat seed

0,00

ex 1001 90 99

High quality common wheat, other than for sowing

0,00

1002 00 00

Rye

0,00

1005 10 90

Maize seed, other than hybrid

0,00

1005 90 00

Maize, other than seed (2)

0,00

1007 00 90

Grain sorghum, other than hybrids for sowing

0,00

---

(1)  For goods arriving in the Union via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal the importer may benefit, persuant to Article 2(4) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010, from a reduction in the duty of:

| — | 3 EUR/t, where the port of unloading is on the Mediterranean Sea, or on the Black Sea, |
| --- | --- |

—

3 EUR/t, where the port of unloading is on the Mediterranean Sea, or on the Black Sea,

| — | 2 EUR/t, where the port of unloading is in Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, or on the Atlantic coast of the Iberian peninsula. |
| --- | --- |

—

2 EUR/t, where the port of unloading is in Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, or on the Atlantic coast of the Iberian peninsula.

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flatrate reduction of EUR 24 per tonne where the conditions laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010 are met.

---

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating the duties laid down in Annex I

1.4.2011-14.4.2011

| 1. | Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010:











  (EUR/t) |
| --- | --- |
| | Common wheat (1) | Maize | Durum wheat, high quality | Durum wheat, medium quality (2) | Durum wheat, low quality (3) | Barley |
| Exchange | Minnéapolis | Chicago | — | — | — | — |
| Quotation | 253,38 | 208,52 | — | — | — | — |
| Fob price USA | — | — | 238,83 | 228,83 | 208,83 | 162,14 |
| Gulf of Mexico premium | — | 14,64 | — | — | — | — |
| Great Lakes premium | 74,16 | — | — | — | — | — |

1.

(EUR/t)

Common wheat (1)

Maize

Durum wheat, high quality

Durum wheat, medium quality (2)

Durum wheat, low quality (3)

Barley

Exchange

Minnéapolis

Chicago

—

—

—

—

Quotation

253,38

208,52

—

—

—

—

Fob price USA

—

—

238,83

228,83

208,83

162,14

Gulf of Mexico premium

—

14,64

—

—

—

—

Great Lakes premium

74,16

—

—

—

—

—

| 2. | Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010:






  Freight costs: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: | 17,88  EUR/t |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Freight costs: Great Lakes–Rotterdam: | 49,29 EUR/t |

2.

Freight costs: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam:

17,88  EUR/t

Freight costs: Great Lakes–Rotterdam:

49,29 EUR/t

---

(1)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010).

(2)  Discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010).

(3)  Discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 642/2010).

---

DIRECTIVES

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/24

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DIRECTIVE 2011/47/EU

of 15 April 2011

amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include aluminium sulphate as active substance and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulations (EC) No 1112/2002 (2) and (EC) No 2229/2004 (3) lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That list included aluminium sulphate. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulations (EC) No 1112/2002 (2) and (EC) No 2229/2004 (3) lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That list included aluminium sulphate.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 24e of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 the notifier withdrew its support of the inclusion of that active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC within two months from receipt of the draft assessment report. Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/941/EC of 8 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances (4) was adopted on the non-inclusion of aluminium sulphate. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 24e of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 the notifier withdrew its support of the inclusion of that active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC within two months from receipt of the draft assessment report. Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/941/EC of 8 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances (4) was adopted on the non-inclusion of aluminium sulphate.

| (3) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the original notifier (hereinafter the ‘applicant’) submitted a new application requesting the application of the accelerated procedure provided for in Articles 14 to 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I (5). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the original notifier (hereinafter the ‘applicant’) submitted a new application requesting the application of the accelerated procedure provided for in Articles 14 to 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I (5).

| (4) | The application was submitted to the Netherlands, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004. The time period for the accelerated procedure was respected. The specification of the active substance and the supported uses are the same as were the subject of Decision 2008/941/EC. That application also complies with the remaining substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The application was submitted to the Netherlands, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004. The time period for the accelerated procedure was respected. The specification of the active substance and the supported uses are the same as were the subject of Decision 2008/941/EC. That application also complies with the remaining substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.

| (5) | The Netherlands evaluated the additional data submitted by the applicant and prepared an additional report. It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 9 March 2010. The Authority communicated the additional report to the other Member States and the applicant for comments and forwarded the comments it had received to the Commission. In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on aluminium sulphate to the Commission on 28 October 2010 (6). The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 March 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for aluminium sulphate. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Netherlands evaluated the additional data submitted by the applicant and prepared an additional report. It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 9 March 2010. The Authority communicated the additional report to the other Member States and the applicant for comments and forwarded the comments it had received to the Commission. In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on aluminium sulphate to the Commission on 28 October 2010 (6). The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 March 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for aluminium sulphate.

| (6) | It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing aluminium sulphate may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which have been examined and detailed in the Commission review report. It is therefore appropriate to include aluminium sulphate in Annex I, in order to ensure that in all Member States the authorisations of plant protection products containing this active substance can be granted in accordance with the provisions of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing aluminium sulphate may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which have been examined and detailed in the Commission review report. It is therefore appropriate to include aluminium sulphate in Annex I, in order to ensure that in all Member States the authorisations of plant protection products containing this active substance can be granted in accordance with the provisions of that Directive.

| (7) | Without prejudice to that conclusion, it is appropriate to obtain further information on certain specific points. Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414/EC provides that inclusion of a substance in Annex I may be subject to conditions. Therefore, it is appropriate to require that the applicant submit confirmatory information as regards the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Without prejudice to that conclusion, it is appropriate to obtain further information on certain specific points. Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414/EC provides that inclusion of a substance in Annex I may be subject to conditions. Therefore, it is appropriate to require that the applicant submit confirmatory information as regards the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data.

| (8) | A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before an active substance is included in Annex I in order to permit Member States and the interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements which will result from the inclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before an active substance is included in Annex I in order to permit Member States and the interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements which will result from the inclusion.

| (9) | Without prejudice to the obligations defined by Directive 91/414/EEC as a consequence of including an active substance in Annex I, Member States should be allowed a period of six months after inclusion to review existing authorisations of plant protection products containing aluminium sulphate to ensure that the requirements laid down by Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular in its Article 13 and the relevant conditions set out in Annex I, are satisfied. Member States should vary, replace or withdraw, as appropriate, existing authorisations, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 91/414/EEC. By derogation from the above deadline, a longer period should be provided for the submission and assessment of the complete Annex III dossier of each plant protection product for each intended use in accordance with the uniform principles laid down in Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Without prejudice to the obligations defined by Directive 91/414/EEC as a consequence of including an active substance in Annex I, Member States should be allowed a period of six months after inclusion to review existing authorisations of plant protection products containing aluminium sulphate to ensure that the requirements laid down by Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular in its Article 13 and the relevant conditions set out in Annex I, are satisfied. Member States should vary, replace or withdraw, as appropriate, existing authorisations, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 91/414/EEC. By derogation from the above deadline, a longer period should be provided for the submission and assessment of the complete Annex III dossier of each plant protection product for each intended use in accordance with the uniform principles laid down in Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (10) | The experience gained from previous inclusions in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of active substances assessed in the framework of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (7) has shown that difficulties can arise in interpreting the duties of holders of existing authorisations in relation to access to data. In order to avoid further difficulties it therefore appears necessary to clarify the duties of the Member States, especially the duty to verify that the holder of an authorisation demonstrates access to a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive. However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The experience gained from previous inclusions in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of active substances assessed in the framework of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (7) has shown that difficulties can arise in interpreting the duties of holders of existing authorisations in relation to access to data. In order to avoid further difficulties it therefore appears necessary to clarify the duties of the Member States, especially the duty to verify that the holder of an authorisation demonstrates access to a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive. However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I.

| (11) | It is therefore appropriate to amend Directive 91/414/EEC accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

It is therefore appropriate to amend Directive 91/414/EEC accordingly.

| (12) | Decision 2008/941/EC provides for the non-inclusion of aluminium sulphate and the withdrawal of authorisation of plant protection products containing that substance by 31 December 2011. It is necessary to delete the line concerning aluminium sulphate in the Annex to that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Decision 2008/941/EC provides for the non-inclusion of aluminium sulphate and the withdrawal of authorisation of plant protection products containing that substance by 31 December 2011. It is necessary to delete the line concerning aluminium sulphate in the Annex to that Decision.

| (13) | It is therefore appropriate to amend Decision 2008/941/EC accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

It is therefore appropriate to amend Decision 2008/941/EC accordingly.

| (14) | The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC is amended as set out in the Annex to this Directive.

Article 2

The line concerning aluminium sulphate in the Annex to Decision 2008/941/EC is deleted.

Article 3

Member States shall adopt and publish by 30 November 2011 at the latest the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.

They shall apply those provisions from 1 December 2011.

When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.

Article 4

1.   Member States shall in accordance with Directive 91/414/EEC, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing aluminium sulphate as an active substance by 30 November 2011.

By that date they shall in particular verify that the conditions in Annex I to that Directive relating to aluminium sulphate are met, with the exception of those identified in part B of the entry concerning that active substance, and that the holder of the authorisation has, or has access to, a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive in accordance with the conditions of Article 13 of that Directive.

2.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing aluminium sulphate as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances all of which were listed in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC by 31 May 2011 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles provided for in Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to that Directive and taking into account part B of the entry in Annex I to that Directive concerning aluminium sulphate. On the basis of that evaluation, they shall determine whether the product satisfies the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b), (c), (d) and (e) of Directive 91/414/EEC.

Following that determination Member States shall:

| (a) | in the case of a product containing aluminium sulphate as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 at the latest; or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

in the case of a product containing aluminium sulphate as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 at the latest; or

| (b) | in the case of a product containing aluminium sulphate as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective Directive or Directives which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, whichever is the latest. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in the case of a product containing aluminium sulphate as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective Directive or Directives which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, whichever is the latest.

Article 5

This Directive shall enter into force on 1 June 2011.

Article 6

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 27.6.2002, p. 14.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 13.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 335, 13.12.2008, p. 91.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 15, 18.1.2008, p. 5.

5

(6)  European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance aluminium sulfate. EFSA Journal 2010;8(11):1889. [32 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1889. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.htm

6

EFSA Journal

(7)  
  OJ L 366, 15.12.1992, p. 10.

7

---

ANNEX

The following entry shall be added at the end of the table in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC:

| No | Common name, identification numbers | IUPAC name | Purity (1) | Entry into force | Expiration of inclusion | Specific provisions |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘351 | Aluminium sulphate
  CAS No: 10043-01-3
  CIPAC not available | Aluminium sulphate | 970  g/kg | 1 June 2011 | 31 May 2021 | PART A
  Only indoor uses as post-harvest bactericide for ornamental plants may be authorised.
  PART B
  For the implementation of the uniform principles of Annex VI, the conclusions of the review report on aluminium sulphate, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 11 March 2011 shall be taken into account.
  The Member States concerned shall request the submission of confirmatory information as regards the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data.
  The Member States concerned shall ensure that the applicant submits such information to the Commission by 1 December 2011.’ |

No

Common name, identification numbers

IUPAC name

Purity (1)

Entry into force

Expiration of inclusion

Specific provisions

‘351

Aluminium sulphate

CAS No: 10043-01-3

CIPAC not available

Aluminium sulphate

970  g/kg

1 June 2011

31 May 2021

PART A

Only indoor uses as post-harvest bactericide for ornamental plants may be authorised.

PART B

For the implementation of the uniform principles of Annex VI, the conclusions of the review report on aluminium sulphate, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 11 March 2011 shall be taken into account.

The Member States concerned shall request the submission of confirmatory information as regards the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data.

The Member States concerned shall ensure that the applicant submits such information to the Commission by 1 December 2011.’

---

(1)  Further details on identity and specification of active substance are provided in the review report.

1

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/28

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DIRECTIVE 2011/48/EU

of 15 April 2011

amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include bromadiolone as active substance and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulations (EC) No 1112/2002 (2) and (EC) No 2229/2004 (3) lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That list included bromadiolone. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulations (EC) No 1112/2002 (2) and (EC) No 2229/2004 (3) lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That list included bromadiolone.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 24e of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 the notifier withdrew its support of the inclusion of that active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC within 2 months from receipt of the draft assessment report. Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/941/EC of 8 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances (4) was adopted on the non-inclusion of bromadiolone. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 24e of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 the notifier withdrew its support of the inclusion of that active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC within 2 months from receipt of the draft assessment report. Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/941/EC of 8 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances (4) was adopted on the non-inclusion of bromadiolone.

| (3) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the original notifier (hereinafter ‘the applicant’) submitted a new application requesting the application of the accelerated procedure provided for in Articles 14 to 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I (5). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the original notifier (hereinafter ‘the applicant’) submitted a new application requesting the application of the accelerated procedure provided for in Articles 14 to 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I (5).

| (4) | The application was submitted to Sweden, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004. The time period for the accelerated procedure was respected. The specification of the active substance and the supported uses are the same as were the subject of Decision 2008/941/EC. That application also complies with the remaining substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The application was submitted to Sweden, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004. The time period for the accelerated procedure was respected. The specification of the active substance and the supported uses are the same as were the subject of Decision 2008/941/EC. That application also complies with the remaining substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.

| (5) | Sweden evaluated the additional data submitted by the applicant and prepared an additional report. It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 4 December 2009. The Authority communicated the additional report to the other Member States and the applicant for comments and forwarded the comments it had received to the Commission. In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on bromadiolone to the Commission on 15 September 2010 (6). The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 March 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for bromadiolone. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Sweden evaluated the additional data submitted by the applicant and prepared an additional report. It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 4 December 2009. The Authority communicated the additional report to the other Member States and the applicant for comments and forwarded the comments it had received to the Commission. In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on bromadiolone to the Commission on 15 September 2010 (6). The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 March 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for bromadiolone.

| (6) | It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing bromadiolone may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which have been examined and detailed in the Commission review report. It is therefore appropriate to include bromadiolone in Annex I, in order to ensure that in all Member States the authorisations of plant protection products containing this active substance can be granted in accordance with the provisions of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing bromadiolone may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which have been examined and detailed in the Commission review report. It is therefore appropriate to include bromadiolone in Annex I, in order to ensure that in all Member States the authorisations of plant protection products containing this active substance can be granted in accordance with the provisions of that Directive.

| (7) | Without prejudice to that conclusion, it is appropriate to obtain further information on certain specific points. Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414/EC provides that inclusion of a substance in Annex I may be subject to conditions. Therefore, it is appropriate to require that the applicant submit confirmatory information as regards: the specification of the technical material as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data, the relevance of the impurities, the determination of bromadiolone in water, the effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures to reduce the risk to birds and non-target mammals and the groundwater exposure assessment in respect of metabolites. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Without prejudice to that conclusion, it is appropriate to obtain further information on certain specific points. Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414/EC provides that inclusion of a substance in Annex I may be subject to conditions. Therefore, it is appropriate to require that the applicant submit confirmatory information as regards: the specification of the technical material as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data, the relevance of the impurities, the determination of bromadiolone in water, the effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures to reduce the risk to birds and non-target mammals and the groundwater exposure assessment in respect of metabolites.

| (8) | A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before an active substance is included in Annex I in order to permit Member States and the interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements which will result from the inclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before an active substance is included in Annex I in order to permit Member States and the interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements which will result from the inclusion.

| (9) | Without prejudice to the obligations defined by Directive 91/414/EEC as a consequence of including an active substance in Annex I, Member States should be allowed a period of 6 months after inclusion to review existing authorisations of plant protection products containing bromadiolone to ensure that the requirements laid down by Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular in its Article 13 and the relevant conditions set out in Annex I, are satisfied. Member States should vary, replace or withdraw, as appropriate, existing authorisations, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 91/414/EEC. By derogation from the above deadline, a longer period should be provided for the submission and assessment of the complete Annex III dossier of each plant protection product for each intended use in accordance with the uniform principles laid down in Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Without prejudice to the obligations defined by Directive 91/414/EEC as a consequence of including an active substance in Annex I, Member States should be allowed a period of 6 months after inclusion to review existing authorisations of plant protection products containing bromadiolone to ensure that the requirements laid down by Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular in its Article 13 and the relevant conditions set out in Annex I, are satisfied. Member States should vary, replace or withdraw, as appropriate, existing authorisations, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 91/414/EEC. By derogation from the above deadline, a longer period should be provided for the submission and assessment of the complete Annex III dossier of each plant protection product for each intended use in accordance with the uniform principles laid down in Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (10) | The experience gained from previous inclusions in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of active substances assessed in the framework of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (7) has shown that difficulties can arise in interpreting the duties of holders of existing authorisations in relation to access to data. In order to avoid further difficulties it therefore appears necessary to clarify the duties of the Member States, especially the duty to verify that the holder of an authorisation demonstrates access to a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive. However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The experience gained from previous inclusions in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of active substances assessed in the framework of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (7) has shown that difficulties can arise in interpreting the duties of holders of existing authorisations in relation to access to data. In order to avoid further difficulties it therefore appears necessary to clarify the duties of the Member States, especially the duty to verify that the holder of an authorisation demonstrates access to a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive. However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I.

| (11) | It is therefore appropriate to amend Directive 91/414/EEC accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

It is therefore appropriate to amend Directive 91/414/EEC accordingly.

| (12) | Decision 2008/941/EC provides for the non-inclusion of bromadiolone and the withdrawal of authorisation of plant protection products containing that substance by 31 December 2011. It is necessary to delete the line concerning bromadiolone in the Annex to that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Decision 2008/941/EC provides for the non-inclusion of bromadiolone and the withdrawal of authorisation of plant protection products containing that substance by 31 December 2011. It is necessary to delete the line concerning bromadiolone in the Annex to that Decision.

| (13) | It is therefore appropriate to amend Decision 2008/941/EC accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

It is therefore appropriate to amend Decision 2008/941/EC accordingly.

| (14) | The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC is amended as set out in the Annex to this Directive.

Article 2

The line concerning bromadiolone in the Annex to Decision 2008/941/EC is deleted.

Article 3

Member States shall adopt and publish by 30 November 2011 at the latest the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.

They shall apply those provisions from 1 December 2011.

When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.

Article 4

1.   Member States shall in accordance with Directive 91/414/EEC, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing bromadiolone as an active substance by 30 November 2011.

By that date they shall in particular verify that the conditions in Annex I to that Directive relating to bromadiolone are met, with the exception of those identified in Part B of the entry concerning that active substance, and that the holder of the authorisation has, or has access to, a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive in accordance with the conditions of Article 13 of that Directive.

2.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing bromadiolone as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances all of which were listed in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC by 31 May 2011 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles provided for in Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to that Directive and taking into account Part B of the entry in Annex I to that Directive concerning bromadiolone. On the basis of that evaluation, they shall determine whether the product satisfies the conditions set out in Article 4(1)(b), (c), (d) and (e) of Directive 91/414/EEC.

Following that determination Member States shall:

| (a) | in the case of a product containing bromadiolone as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 at the latest; or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

in the case of a product containing bromadiolone as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 at the latest; or

| (b) | in the case of a product containing bromadiolone as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective Directive or Directives which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, whichever is the latest. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in the case of a product containing bromadiolone as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective Directive or Directives which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, whichever is the latest.

Article 5

This Directive shall enter into force on 1 June 2011.

Article 6

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 27.6.2002, p. 14.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 13.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 335, 13.12.2008, p. 91.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 15, 18.1.2008, p. 5.

5

(6)  European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance bromadiolone. EFSA Journal 2010;8(10):1783. [44 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1783. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.htm

6

(7)  
  OJ L 366, 15.12.1992, p. 10.

7

---

ANNEX

The following entry shall be added at the end of the table in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC:

| No | Common Name, Identification Numbers | IUPAC Name | Purity (1) | Entry into force | Expiration of inclusion | Specific provisions |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘352 | bromadiolone
  CAS No: 28772-56-7
  CIPAC No: 371 | 3-[(1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-3-(4′-bromobiphenyl-4-yl)-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpropyl]-4-hydroxycoumarin | ≥ 970 g/kg | 1 June 2011 | 31 May 2021 | PART A
  Only uses as rodenticide in the form of pre-prepared baits placed into the rodent tunnels may be authorised.
  The nominal concentration of the active substance in the plant protection products shall not exceed 50 mg/kg.
  Authorisations shall be granted for uses by professional users only.
  PART B
  For the implementation of the uniform principles of Annex VI, the conclusions of the review report on bromadiolone, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 11 March 2011 shall be taken into account.
  In this overall assessment Member States shall:






  — | pay particular attention to the risk to professional operators and ensure that conditions of use include the application of adequate personal protective equipment where appropriate, |

No

Common Name, Identification Numbers

IUPAC Name

Purity (1)

Entry into force

Expiration of inclusion

Specific provisions

‘352

bromadiolone

CAS No: 28772-56-7

CIPAC No: 371

3-[(1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-3-(4′-bromobiphenyl-4-yl)-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpropyl]-4-hydroxycoumarin

≥ 970 g/kg

1 June 2011

31 May 2021

PART A

Only uses as rodenticide in the form of pre-prepared baits placed into the rodent tunnels may be authorised.

The nominal concentration of the active substance in the plant protection products shall not exceed 50 mg/kg.

Authorisations shall be granted for uses by professional users only.

PART B

For the implementation of the uniform principles of Annex VI, the conclusions of the review report on bromadiolone, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 11 March 2011 shall be taken into account.

In this overall assessment Member States shall:

—

pay particular attention to the risk to professional operators and ensure that conditions of use include the application of adequate personal protective equipment where appropriate,

| — | pay particular attention to the risk to birds and non-target mammals from primary and secondary poisoning. |
| --- | --- |

—

pay particular attention to the risk to birds and non-target mammals from primary and secondary poisoning.

Conditions of authorisation shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.

The Member States concerned shall request the submission of confirmatory information as regards:

| (a) | the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, in the form of appropriate analytical data;

| (b) | the relevance of the impurities; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the relevance of the impurities;

| (c) | the determination of bromadiolone in water with a limit of quantification of 0,01 μg/l; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the determination of bromadiolone in water with a limit of quantification of 0,01 μg/l;

| (d) | the effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures to reduce risk to birds and non-target mammals; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures to reduce risk to birds and non-target mammals;

| (e) | the groundwater exposure assessment in respect of metabolites. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the groundwater exposure assessment in respect of metabolites.

The Member States concerned shall ensure that the applicant submits to the Commission the information set out in points (a), (b) and (c) by 30 November 2011 and the information set out in points (d) and (e) by 31 May 2013.’

---

(1)  Further details on identity and specification of active substance are provided in the review report.

1

---

DECISIONS

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/32

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 April 2011

appointing one Italian member of the Committee of the Regions

(2011/243/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | One member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Riccardo VENTRE, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

One member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Riccardo VENTRE,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby reappointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Riccardo VENTRE, Assessore del Comune di Piana di Monte Verna (change of mandate). |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Riccardo VENTRE, Assessore del Comune di Piana di Monte Verna (change of mandate).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 11 April 2011.

For the Council

The President

PINTÉR S.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/33

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 15 April 2011

of excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)

(notified under document C(2011) 2517)

(only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, and Spanish texts are authentic)

(2011/244/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (2), and in particular Article 31 thereof,

Having consulted the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.

| (2) | The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission.

| (3) | Under Regulations (EC) No 1258/1999 and (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Under Regulations (EC) No 1258/1999 and (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed.

| (4) | In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD.

| (5) | The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States.

| (6) | As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with European Union rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with European Union rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.

| (7) | This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 31 December 2010 and relating to its content, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 31 December 2010 and relating to its content,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, under the EAGF or under the EAFRD shall be excluded from European Union financing because it does not comply with European Union rules.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Portuguese Republic, Romania and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2011.

For the Commission

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p.103.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

| MS | Measure | Financial Year | Reason | Type | % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BUDGET ITEM 6701 |
| BG | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Weaknesses in the functioning of LPIS-GIS | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | –20 848 236,79 | 0,00 | –20 848 236,79 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (BG) | EUR | –20 848 236,79 | 0,00 | –20 848 236,79 |
| DK | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2007 | Deficient performance of the on-the-spot control | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | DKK | –36 186,06 | 0,00 | –36 186,06 |
| DK | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2008 | Deficient performance of the on-the-spot control | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | –58 609,25 | 0,00 | –58 609,25 |
| DK | Dried Fodder | 2005 | Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | DKK | –81 519,23 | 0,00 | –81 519,23 |
| DK | Dried Fodder | 2006 | Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | DKK | – 384 358,59 | 0,00 | – 384 358,59 |
| DK | Dried Fodder (2007+) | 2007 | Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | DKK | – 376 720,62 | 0,00 | – 376 720,62 |
| DK | Dried Fodder (2007+) | 2008 | Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | DKK | –54 280,43 | 0,00 | –54 280,43 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (DK) | EUR | –58 609,25 | 0,00 | –58 609,25 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (DK) | DKK | – 933 064,93 | 0,00 | – 933 064,93 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Ewe and Goats | 2004 | Late start of on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | –1 559 059,12 | 0,00 | –1 559 059,12 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Bovines | 2004 | On-the-spot control weakness | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –13 753,33 | 0,00 | –13 753,33 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Bovines | 2004 | On-the-spot control weaknesses - insufficent or inadequate quality of control - inadequate control | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –1 401 451,46 | 0,00 | –1 401 451,46 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Ewe and Goats | 2005 | Late start of on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | –1 652 652,30 | 0,00 | –1 652 652,30 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Bovines | 2005 | On-the-spot control weakness | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –14 080,18 | 0,00 | –14 080,18 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Bovines | 2005 | On-the-spot control weaknesses - insufficent or inadequate quality of control - inadequate control | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –1 421 329,38 | 0,00 | –1 421 329,38 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Bovines | 2006 | On-the-spot control weaknesses - insufficent or inadequate quality of control - inadequate control | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –1 379 600,32 | –4 082,25 | –1 375 518,07 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2006 | Deficiencies in the environmental management of packaging | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –2 672 816,95 | 0,00 | –2 672 816,95 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2007 | Deficiencies in the environmental management of packaging | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –16 985 313,14 | 0,00 | –16 985 313,14 |
| ES | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2008 | Deficiencies in the environmental management of packaging | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –17 594 421,01 | 0,00 | –17 594 421,01 |
| ES | Meat Premiums - Bovines | 2006 | On-the-spot control weaknesses | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | – 187 589,74 | 0,00 | – 187 589,74 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2003 | Deficiencies in the controls of yields | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | –21 570,64 | 0,00 | –21 570,64 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2003 | Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –4 462,77 | 0,00 | –4 462,77 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2004 | Correction of effect of flat rate correction on one-off correction | ONE-OFF | | EUR | 166 246,08 | 0,00 | 166 246,08 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2004 | Deficiencies in the controls of yields | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | –16 844 579,61 | 0,00 | –16 844 579,61 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2004 | Incorrect calculation of sanctions | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –5 230 671,00 | 0,00 | –5 230 671,00 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2004 | Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –5 678 034,36 | 0,00 | –5 678 034,36 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2005 | Correction of effect of flat rate correction on one-off correction | ONE-OFF | | EUR | 78 467,60 | 0,00 | 78 467,60 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2005 | Deficiencies in the controls of yields | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | –19 830 448,92 | 0,00 | –19 830 448,92 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2005 | Incorrect calculation of sanctions | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –3 923 380,00 | 0,00 | –3 923 380,00 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2005 | Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –89 880,78 | 0,00 | –89 880,78 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2006 | Correction of effect of flat rate correction on one-off correction | ONE-OFF | | EUR | 11 060,06 | 0,00 | 11 060,06 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2006 | Deficiencies in the controls of yields | FLAT RATE | 2,00 | EUR | –19 030 403,00 | 0,00 | –19 030 403,00 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2006 | Incorrect calculation of sanctions | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 553 003,00 | 0,00 | – 553 003,00 |
| ES | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2006 | Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –10 623,55 | 0,00 | –10 623,55 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (ES) | EUR | – 115 843 350,82 | –4 082,25 | – 115 839 268,57 |
| FR | Direct Payments | 2007 | Weaknesses in the administrative procedure | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 724 823,68 | 0,00 | – 724 823,68 |
| FR | Direct Decoupled Aid (single payment scheme - SPS) | 2008 | Weaknesses in the administrative procedure | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 872 782,68 | 0,00 | – 872 782,68 |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Weaknesses in the administrative procedure | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 727 988,33 | 0,00 | – 727 988,33 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (FR) | EUR | –2 325 594,69 | 0,00 | –2 325 594,69 |
| GB | Export refunds - Other | 2006 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 339,41 | 0,00 | – 339,41 |
| GB | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2006 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –1 551,62 | 0,00 | –1 551,62 |
| GB | Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose | 2006 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –2 957,78 | 0,00 | –2 957,78 |
| GB | Export refunds - Other | 2007 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 224,14 | 0,00 | – 224,14 |
| GB | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2007 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –1 024,64 | 0,00 | –1 024,64 |
| GB | Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose | 2007 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –1 953,22 | 0,00 | –1 953,22 |
| GB | Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose | 2008 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 153,04 | 0,00 | – 153,04 |
| GB | Export refunds - Other | 2008 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –17,57 | 0,00 | –17,57 |
| GB | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2008 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –80,28 | 0,00 | –80,28 |
| GB | Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose | 2009 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –7,57 | 0,00 | –7,57 |
| GB | Export refunds - Other | 2009 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –0,87 | 0,00 | –0,87 |
| GB | Export refunds - Non-Annex I | 2009 | Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –3,97 | 0,00 | –3,97 |
| GB | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2006 | Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 508 223,82 | 0,00 | – 508 223,82 |
| GB | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2006 | Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –6 171 594,78 | 0,00 | –6 171 594,78 |
| GB | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2007 | Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 999 359,83 | 0,00 | – 999 359,83 |
| GB | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2007 | Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –12 135 684,18 | 0,00 | –12 135 684,18 |
| GB | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2008 | Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –6 589 732,17 | 0,00 | –6 589 732,17 |
| GB | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2008 | Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 542 656,97 | 0,00 | – 542 656,97 |
| GB | Exceptional support measures | 2009 | Rendering and transport costs unduly charged to the EU budget; dead animals claimed for EU financing | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 284 317,36 | 0,00 | – 284 317,36 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (GB) | EUR | –27 239 883,22 | 0,00 | –27 239 883,22 |
| GR | Additional Amounts of Aid | 2008 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –3 685 863,71 | 0,00 | –3 685 863,71 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Sugar - other than Export refunds | 2008 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 130 504,79 | 0,00 | – 130 504,79 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Direct Payments | 2008 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –1 497 576,86 | 0,00 | –1 497 576,86 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Cotton | 2008 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –9 155 093,09 | 0,00 | –9 155 093,09 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines | 2008 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –3 310 395,31 | 0,00 | –3 310 395,31 |
| GR | Direct Decoupled Aid (single payment scheme - SPS) | 2008 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –91 632 386,41 | 0,00 | –91 632 386,41 |
| GR | Other Direct Aids | 2009 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | 5 928,18 | 0,00 | 5 928,18 |
| GR | Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines | 2009 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | 1 407,54 | 0,00 | 1 407,54 |
| GR | Additional Amounts of Aid | 2009 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | 2 668,68 | 0,00 | 2 668,68 |
| GR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 810 049,67 | 0,00 | – 810 049,67 |
| GR | Olive Oil - Production Aid | 2004 | Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | – 193 490,20 | 0,00 | – 193 490,20 |
| GR | Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+) | 2005 | Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS | FLAT RATE | 15,00 | EUR | – 283 443,46 | 0,00 | – 283 443,46 |
| GR | Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+) | 2005 | Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | –43 471 909,07 | 0,00 | –43 471 909,07 |
| GR | Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+) | 2006 | Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | – 447 353,51 | 0,00 | – 447 353,51 |
| GR | Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+) | 2006 | Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS | FLAT RATE | 15,00 | EUR | –89 134 155,41 | – 215 120,80 | –88 919 034,62 |
| GR | Olive Oil - Financement GIS | 2004 | Ineligible expenditures concerning activities carried out after 31 October 2003 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –3 437 468,51 | 0,00 | –3 437 468,51 |
| GR | Olive Oil - Financement GIS | 2006 | Ineligible expenditures concerning activities carried out after 31 October 2003 | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 263 620,00 | 0,00 | – 263 620,00 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (GR) | EUR | – 247 443 305,60 | – 215 120,80 | – 247 228 184,80 |
| IT | Public Storage - Sugar | 2005 | Booking the sugar intake in 2005 not subject to physical movement | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 797 560,00 | 0,00 | – 797 560,00 |
| IT | Public Storage - Sugar | 2006 | 35 % increase in storage costs | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | – 171 418,00 | 0,00 | – 171 418,00 |
| IT | Public Storage - Sugar | 2006 | Late inventory controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 781 044,00 | 0,00 | – 781 044,00 |
| IT | Public Storage - Sugar | 2007 | 35 % increase in storage costs | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | – 182 006,00 | 0,00 | – 182 006,00 |
| IT | Public Storage - Sugar | 2008 | 35 % increase in storage costs | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | – 111 062,00 | 0,00 | – 111 062,00 |
| IT | Public Storage - Sugar | 2009 | 35 % increase in storage costs | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | –34 547,00 | 0,00 | –34 547,00 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (IT) | EUR | –2 077 637,00 | 0,00 | –2 077 637,00 |
| NL | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2006 | Ineligible costs for printing on packages and expenditures of a producer organisation with decentralised marketing | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –5 166 882,80 | 0,00 | –5 166 882,80 |
| NL | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2007 | Ineligible costs for printing on packages and expenditures of a producer organisation with decentralised marketing | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –10 543 404,52 | 0,00 | –10 543 404,52 |
| NL | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes | 2008 | Ineligible costs for printing on packages and expenditures of a producer organisation with decentralised marketing | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –6 981 120,47 | 0,00 | –6 981 120,47 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (NL) | EUR | –22 691 407,79 | 0,00 | –22 691 407,79 |
| PT | Other Direct Aid - Bovines | 2007 | Weeknesses established in the functioning of IT system | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 415 669,10 | 0,00 | – 415 669,10 |
| PT | Other Direct Aid - Bovines | 2008 | Weeknesses established in the functioning of IT system | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 304 813,73 | 0,00 | – 304 813,73 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (PT) | EUR | – 720 482,83 | 0,00 | – 720 482,83 |
| RO | Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | –6 694,99 | 0,00 | –6 694,99 |
| RO | Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 108 740,61 | 0,00 | – 108 740,61 |
| RO | Other Direct Aids | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –52 831,05 | 0,00 | –52 831,05 |
| RO | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | – 489 527,30 | 0,00 | – 489 527,30 |
| RO | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –38 620 445,36 | 0,00 | –38 620 445,36 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (RO) | EUR | –39 278 239,32 | 0,00 | –39 278 239,32 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (6701) | EUR | – 478 526 747,31 | – 219 203,05 | – 478 307 544,26 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (6701) | DKK | – 933 064,93 | 0,00 | – 933 064,93 |
| BUDGET ITEM 6711 |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Weaknesses in the functioning of LPIS-GIS | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | –1 204 509,85 | 0,00 | –1 204 509,85 |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2009 | Weaknesses in the functioning of LPIS-GIS and on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –2 490 360,23 | 0,00 | –2 490 360,23 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (BG) | EUR | –3 694 870,08 | 0,00 | –3 694 870,08 |
| GR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2007 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –3 154 596,63 | 0,00 | –3 154 596,63 |
| GR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2008 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | –8 414 084,26 | 0,00 | –8 414 084,26 |
| GR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 | EUR | – 597 155,10 | 0,00 | – 597 155,10 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (GR) | EUR | –12 165 835,99 | 0,00 | –12 165 835,99 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | –7 246 383,51 | 0,00 | –7 246 383,51 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –10 512 529,35 | 0,00 | –10 512 529,35 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | ONE-OFF | | EUR | – 877 717,21 | 0,00 | – 877 717,21 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 | EUR | –10 975 412,09 | 0,00 | –10 975 412,09 |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks | ONE-OFF | | EUR | –6 008 420,75 | 0,00 | –6 008 420,75 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (RO) | EUR | –35 620 462,91 | 0,00 | –35 620 462,91 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (6711) | EUR | –51 481 168,98 | 0,00 | –51 481 168,98 |
| BUDGET ITEM 05070107 |
| DE | Irregularities | 2009 | Reimbursement concerning irregularity cases | ONE-OFF | | EUR | 508 165,76 | 0,00 | 508 165,76 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (DE) | EUR | 508 165,76 | 0,00 | 508 165,76 |
| | | | | | TOTAL (05070107) | EUR | 508 165,76 | 0,00 | 508 165,76 |

MS

Measure

Financial Year

Reason

Type

%

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial impact

BUDGET ITEM 6701

BG

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Weaknesses in the functioning of LPIS-GIS

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

–20 848 236,79

0,00

–20 848 236,79

TOTAL (BG)

EUR

–20 848 236,79

0,00

–20 848 236,79

DK

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2007

Deficient performance of the on-the-spot control

FLAT RATE

2,00

DKK

–36 186,06

0,00

–36 186,06

DK

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2008

Deficient performance of the on-the-spot control

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

–58 609,25

0,00

–58 609,25

DK

Dried Fodder

2005

Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics

FLAT RATE

2,00

DKK

–81 519,23

0,00

–81 519,23

DK

Dried Fodder

2006

Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics

FLAT RATE

2,00

DKK

– 384 358,59

0,00

– 384 358,59

DK

Dried Fodder (2007+)

2007

Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics

FLAT RATE

2,00

DKK

– 376 720,62

0,00

– 376 720,62

DK

Dried Fodder (2007+)

2008

Non-compliance with the minimum percentage of additional checks of operators who dried fodder has been supplied to and the late submission of the annual statistics

FLAT RATE

2,00

DKK

–54 280,43

0,00

–54 280,43

TOTAL (DK)

EUR

–58 609,25

0,00

–58 609,25

TOTAL (DK)

DKK

– 933 064,93

0,00

– 933 064,93

ES

Meat Premiums - Ewe and Goats

2004

Late start of on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

–1 559 059,12

0,00

–1 559 059,12

ES

Meat Premiums - Bovines

2004

On-the-spot control weakness

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–13 753,33

0,00

–13 753,33

ES

Meat Premiums - Bovines

2004

On-the-spot control weaknesses - insufficent or inadequate quality of control - inadequate control

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–1 401 451,46

0,00

–1 401 451,46

ES

Meat Premiums - Ewe and Goats

2005

Late start of on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

–1 652 652,30

0,00

–1 652 652,30

ES

Meat Premiums - Bovines

2005

On-the-spot control weakness

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–14 080,18

0,00

–14 080,18

ES

Meat Premiums - Bovines

2005

On-the-spot control weaknesses - insufficent or inadequate quality of control - inadequate control

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–1 421 329,38

0,00

–1 421 329,38

ES

Meat Premiums - Bovines

2006

On-the-spot control weaknesses - insufficent or inadequate quality of control - inadequate control

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–1 379 600,32

–4 082,25

–1 375 518,07

ES

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2006

Deficiencies in the environmental management of packaging

ONE-OFF

EUR

–2 672 816,95

0,00

–2 672 816,95

ES

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2007

Deficiencies in the environmental management of packaging

ONE-OFF

EUR

–16 985 313,14

0,00

–16 985 313,14

ES

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2008

Deficiencies in the environmental management of packaging

ONE-OFF

EUR

–17 594 421,01

0,00

–17 594 421,01

ES

Meat Premiums - Bovines

2006

On-the-spot control weaknesses

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

– 187 589,74

0,00

– 187 589,74

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2003

Deficiencies in the controls of yields

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

–21 570,64

0,00

–21 570,64

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2003

Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–4 462,77

0,00

–4 462,77

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2004

Correction of effect of flat rate correction on one-off correction

ONE-OFF

EUR

166 246,08

0,00

166 246,08

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2004

Deficiencies in the controls of yields

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

–16 844 579,61

0,00

–16 844 579,61

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2004

Incorrect calculation of sanctions

ONE-OFF

EUR

–5 230 671,00

0,00

–5 230 671,00

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2004

Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–5 678 034,36

0,00

–5 678 034,36

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2005

Correction of effect of flat rate correction on one-off correction

ONE-OFF

EUR

78 467,60

0,00

78 467,60

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2005

Deficiencies in the controls of yields

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

–19 830 448,92

0,00

–19 830 448,92

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2005

Incorrect calculation of sanctions

ONE-OFF

EUR

–3 923 380,00

0,00

–3 923 380,00

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2005

Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–89 880,78

0,00

–89 880,78

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2006

Correction of effect of flat rate correction on one-off correction

ONE-OFF

EUR

11 060,06

0,00

11 060,06

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2006

Deficiencies in the controls of yields

FLAT RATE

2,00

EUR

–19 030 403,00

0,00

–19 030 403,00

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2006

Incorrect calculation of sanctions

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 553 003,00

0,00

– 553 003,00

ES

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2006

Incorrect technical tolerances leading to non respect of Olive GIS requirements the first year of application

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–10 623,55

0,00

–10 623,55

TOTAL (ES)

EUR

– 115 843 350,82

–4 082,25

– 115 839 268,57

FR

Direct Payments

2007

Weaknesses in the administrative procedure

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 724 823,68

0,00

– 724 823,68

FR

Direct Decoupled Aid (single payment scheme - SPS)

2008

Weaknesses in the administrative procedure

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 872 782,68

0,00

– 872 782,68

FR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Weaknesses in the administrative procedure

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 727 988,33

0,00

– 727 988,33

TOTAL (FR)

EUR

–2 325 594,69

0,00

–2 325 594,69

GB

Export refunds - Other

2006

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 339,41

0,00

– 339,41

GB

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2006

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–1 551,62

0,00

–1 551,62

GB

Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose

2006

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–2 957,78

0,00

–2 957,78

GB

Export refunds - Other

2007

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 224,14

0,00

– 224,14

GB

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2007

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–1 024,64

0,00

–1 024,64

GB

Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose

2007

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–1 953,22

0,00

–1 953,22

GB

Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose

2008

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 153,04

0,00

– 153,04

GB

Export refunds - Other

2008

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–17,57

0,00

–17,57

GB

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2008

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–80,28

0,00

–80,28

GB

Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose

2009

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–7,57

0,00

–7,57

GB

Export refunds - Other

2009

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–0,87

0,00

–0,87

GB

Export refunds - Non-Annex I

2009

Weaknesses in the procedure for certification of exit

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–3,97

0,00

–3,97

GB

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2006

Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 508 223,82

0,00

– 508 223,82

GB

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2006

Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes

ONE-OFF

EUR

–6 171 594,78

0,00

–6 171 594,78

GB

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2007

Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 999 359,83

0,00

– 999 359,83

GB

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2007

Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes

ONE-OFF

EUR

–12 135 684,18

0,00

–12 135 684,18

GB

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2008

Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes

ONE-OFF

EUR

–6 589 732,17

0,00

–6 589 732,17

GB

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2008

Deficiencies in key controls on recognition and operational programmes

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 542 656,97

0,00

– 542 656,97

GB

Exceptional support measures

2009

Rendering and transport costs unduly charged to the EU budget; dead animals claimed for EU financing

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 284 317,36

0,00

– 284 317,36

TOTAL (GB)

EUR

–27 239 883,22

0,00

–27 239 883,22

GR

Additional Amounts of Aid

2008

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–3 685 863,71

0,00

–3 685 863,71

GR

Other Direct Aid - Sugar - other than Export refunds

2008

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 130 504,79

0,00

– 130 504,79

GR

Other Direct Aid - Direct Payments

2008

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–1 497 576,86

0,00

–1 497 576,86

GR

Other Direct Aid - Cotton

2008

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–9 155 093,09

0,00

–9 155 093,09

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines

2008

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–3 310 395,31

0,00

–3 310 395,31

GR

Direct Decoupled Aid (single payment scheme - SPS)

2008

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–91 632 386,41

0,00

–91 632 386,41

GR

Other Direct Aids

2009

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

5 928,18

0,00

5 928,18

GR

Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines

2009

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

1 407,54

0,00

1 407,54

GR

Additional Amounts of Aid

2009

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

2 668,68

0,00

2 668,68

GR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 810 049,67

0,00

– 810 049,67

GR

Olive Oil - Production Aid

2004

Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

– 193 490,20

0,00

– 193 490,20

GR

Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+)

2005

Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS

FLAT RATE

15,00

EUR

– 283 443,46

0,00

– 283 443,46

GR

Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+)

2005

Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

–43 471 909,07

0,00

–43 471 909,07

GR

Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+)

2006

Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

– 447 353,51

0,00

– 447 353,51

GR

Olive Oil - Production Aid (2007+)

2006

Weaknesses in the controls of mills and in the olive cultivation GIS

FLAT RATE

15,00

EUR

–89 134 155,41

– 215 120,80

–88 919 034,62

GR

Olive Oil - Financement GIS

2004

Ineligible expenditures concerning activities carried out after 31 October 2003

ONE-OFF

EUR

–3 437 468,51

0,00

–3 437 468,51

GR

Olive Oil - Financement GIS

2006

Ineligible expenditures concerning activities carried out after 31 October 2003

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 263 620,00

0,00

– 263 620,00

TOTAL (GR)

EUR

– 247 443 305,60

– 215 120,80

– 247 228 184,80

IT

Public Storage - Sugar

2005

Booking the sugar intake in 2005 not subject to physical movement

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 797 560,00

0,00

– 797 560,00

IT

Public Storage - Sugar

2006

35 % increase in storage costs

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

– 171 418,00

0,00

– 171 418,00

IT

Public Storage - Sugar

2006

Late inventory controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 781 044,00

0,00

– 781 044,00

IT

Public Storage - Sugar

2007

35 % increase in storage costs

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

– 182 006,00

0,00

– 182 006,00

IT

Public Storage - Sugar

2008

35 % increase in storage costs

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

– 111 062,00

0,00

– 111 062,00

IT

Public Storage - Sugar

2009

35 % increase in storage costs

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

–34 547,00

0,00

–34 547,00

TOTAL (IT)

EUR

–2 077 637,00

0,00

–2 077 637,00

NL

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2006

Ineligible costs for printing on packages and expenditures of a producer organisation with decentralised marketing

ONE-OFF

EUR

–5 166 882,80

0,00

–5 166 882,80

NL

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2007

Ineligible costs for printing on packages and expenditures of a producer organisation with decentralised marketing

ONE-OFF

EUR

–10 543 404,52

0,00

–10 543 404,52

NL

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational Programmes

2008

Ineligible costs for printing on packages and expenditures of a producer organisation with decentralised marketing

ONE-OFF

EUR

–6 981 120,47

0,00

–6 981 120,47

TOTAL (NL)

EUR

–22 691 407,79

0,00

–22 691 407,79

PT

Other Direct Aid - Bovines

2007

Weeknesses established in the functioning of IT system

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 415 669,10

0,00

– 415 669,10

PT

Other Direct Aid - Bovines

2008

Weeknesses established in the functioning of IT system

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 304 813,73

0,00

– 304 813,73

TOTAL (PT)

EUR

– 720 482,83

0,00

– 720 482,83

RO

Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

–6 694,99

0,00

–6 694,99

RO

Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 108 740,61

0,00

– 108 740,61

RO

Other Direct Aids

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

ONE-OFF

EUR

–52 831,05

0,00

–52 831,05

RO

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

– 489 527,30

0,00

– 489 527,30

RO

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

ONE-OFF

EUR

–38 620 445,36

0,00

–38 620 445,36

TOTAL (RO)

EUR

–39 278 239,32

0,00

–39 278 239,32

TOTAL (6701)

EUR

– 478 526 747,31

– 219 203,05

– 478 307 544,26

TOTAL (6701)

DKK

– 933 064,93

0,00

– 933 064,93

BUDGET ITEM 6711

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Weaknesses in the functioning of LPIS-GIS

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

–1 204 509,85

0,00

–1 204 509,85

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2009

Weaknesses in the functioning of LPIS-GIS and on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–2 490 360,23

0,00

–2 490 360,23

TOTAL (BG)

EUR

–3 694 870,08

0,00

–3 694 870,08

GR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2007

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–3 154 596,63

0,00

–3 154 596,63

GR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2008

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

–8 414 084,26

0,00

–8 414 084,26

GR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Incorrect information in the LPIS/GIS and weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00

EUR

– 597 155,10

0,00

– 597 155,10

TOTAL (GR)

EUR

–12 165 835,99

0,00

–12 165 835,99

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

–7 246 383,51

0,00

–7 246 383,51

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

ONE-OFF

EUR

–10 512 529,35

0,00

–10 512 529,35

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

ONE-OFF

EUR

– 877 717,21

0,00

– 877 717,21

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

FLAT RATE

10,00

EUR

–10 975 412,09

0,00

–10 975 412,09

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of LPIS-GIS, in the performance of the on-the-spot/field visits following administrative cross-checks

ONE-OFF

EUR

–6 008 420,75

0,00

–6 008 420,75

TOTAL (RO)

EUR

–35 620 462,91

0,00

–35 620 462,91

TOTAL (6711)

EUR

–51 481 168,98

0,00

–51 481 168,98

BUDGET ITEM 05070107

DE

Irregularities

2009

Reimbursement concerning irregularity cases

ONE-OFF

EUR

508 165,76

0,00

508 165,76

TOTAL (DE)

EUR

508 165,76

0,00

508 165,76

TOTAL (05070107)

EUR

508 165,76

0,00

508 165,76

---

Corrigenda

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/44

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 28 of 2 February 2011
  )

In the table of contents and on page 17, the title:

for:

‘Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus’,

read:

‘Council Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 of 31 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus’.

---

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/44

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 254 of 26 September 2009
  )

On page 92, Annex III, Part C:

for:

| ‘— | in German | : | Anwendung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 891/2009, Zucker zur industriellen Einfuhr. Laufende Nummer 09.4380’, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘—

in German

:

Anwendung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 891/2009, Zucker zur industriellen Einfuhr. Laufende Nummer 09.4380’,

read:

| ‘— | in German | : | Anwendung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 891/2009, Zucker zur außerordentlichen Einfuhr. Laufende Nummer 09.4380’. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘—

in German

:

Anwendung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 891/2009, Zucker zur außerordentlichen Einfuhr. Laufende Nummer 09.4380’.

---