alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fleetwood *vs.*Dees *et al.*

Where a bill was filed in the superior court of Pulaski county against Lizzie Dees of that county, and certain other defendants of Wilkinson county, and it appeared by the bill that, before its filing, Lizzie Dees had sold her interest in the homestead property, the subject-matter of the proceeding, to her co-defendants, the bill was properly dismissed, on demurrer, for want of jurisdiction.

July 11, 1888.

Equity. Jurisdiction. Parties. Before Judge Fort. Pulaski superior court. November term, 1887.

Reported in the decision.

*730Hardeman & Davis, by brief, for plaintiff.

Hill & Harris and J. H. Martin, for defendants.

Blandford, Justice.

This was a bill filed in the superior court of Pulaski county, by Mrs. Fleetwood- against Miss Dees of that county, and against James Lord and H. A. Hall of Wilkinson county. It appears that Miss Dees had, before the filing of this bill, sold her interest in the homestead property, the subject-matter of the proceeding, to the co-defendants. Upon demurrer, the bill was dismissed by the court for want of jurisdiction.

We think the court was right in dismissing this bill. Miss Dees having parted with her interest in the property, and not being a party at interest under the bill, no re¿ief could be prayed as against her; and she being the only defendant residing in the county of Pulaski, the superior court of that county had no jurisdiction.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
2. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
3. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.



|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation
    General Partner
|------ | -------------------------------------------------------------
|       | /S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                         
|       |                                                              
|       |                                                              
|Name:  | Brenda G. Gujral                                             
|       |                                                              
|Title: | President of the General Partner and principal               
|       | executive officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.               
|       |                                                              
|Date:  | May 10, 2005
(C. D. 1112)

#### E. L. Cuendet *v.*United States

United States Customs Court, Third Division

(Decided May 28, 1948)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Dorothy C. Bennett,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Before Cline, Ekwall, and Johnson, Judges

Johnson, Judge:

This action arises by reason of the shortage in a case of music box instruments which the importer discovered in a shipment from Switzerland. The discharging inspector made no report of shortage. Nor was any shortage discovered by the appraiser when the contents were examined at the appraiser’s stores for copper content.

*224' At the trial the importer testified that there was no indication of the case having been previously opened. But when it was examined in his place of business the music box works packed in one of the several boxes making up the contents of the case showed signs of having been riñed. When checking with the invoice, 'he discovered that seven of the musical works were missing.

The examiner’s aid who initialed the verifier’s ticket testified that he had nothing to do with verifying the contents of the case but the opener and packer had verified one of the inner containers which held six types of music works in order to obtain the weight of the copper therein and at the time of such examination no shortage was noticeable.

From the evidence it seems that the music box works were packed in smaller boxes in the case and the articles in question were taken from one of these inner boxes leaving an empty space therein. Such shortages would not have been discovered ordinarily unless all of the boxes in the case were examined. As there was no indication of the case having been pilfered at the time of unlading from the discharging vessel when examined by the discharging inspector, a detailed examination was not ordered to be made by the appraiser. The entire contents of the case thus not having been examined there was nothing to establish whether or not the pilferage took place before the case was landed in this country.

There is not the remotest doubt from the testimony given by the plaintiff that there was in fact a shortage of the invoiced quantity of music works. Nor is there any question as to the veracity, integrity, and high standing of the importer, as well as his good intentions, but inasmuch as proof is required to establish that the articles, which were not found, never were landed in the United States, and the plaintiff was unable to present such proof to the court, we are constrained to enter judgment in favor of the Government.
(Reap. Dec. 11051)

#### Wood Mosaic Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 1405; 2297.

(Decided August 4, 1965)

*Sharp, 8otter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, counsel for the United States:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the present appeals for reappraisement consisted of Lauan plywood manufactured in Taiwan, Republic of China, and is described in the invoices as *Vs",*rotary cut, Type III, TCC grade Lauan plywood ;

> 2. That the correct basis of appraisement of the subject merchandise is export value within the meaning of Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956;

> 3. That at the time of exportation of the subject merchandise to the United States, such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered in the principal markets of Taiwan, for export to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, at the price of $36.00 per thousand square feet, net packed, EOB port of shipment;

> 4. That as to all other merchandise covered by the invoices pertaining to these appeals for reappraisement, Plaintiff herewith abandons its appeal; and that these appeals for reappraisement are deemed submitted upon the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 'amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise, described *568on tbe invoices as rotary cut, Type III, TCC grade Lauan plywood,” and that said value is $36 per thousand square feet, net packed, f.o.b. port of shipment.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
590

590

P E C O R P O IN T L N

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D S

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D N

F R O G P O N D R D

P E C O R P O IN T L N

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D S

C O U N T Y H W Y-R D N

F R O G P O N D R D

L A K E M I C H I G A N

G R E E N B A Y

Oconto

Shoal

Pensaukee

Shoal

Oconto

Shoal

Peshtigo

Harbor

Little

Tail

Point

Namur

Oconto

East

Little

Sturgeon SW

Oconto

West

Pensaukee Oconto SE

Dyckesville

65

68

N

58

68

45'

69

33 37

4 2

49

49

49

49

4

52' 47'

52'

45'

000

57

62

63

64

32 36

35

40

550

47'

49

49

49

49

30"

87°

61

62

65

66

31 38 000m FEET

50' 50'

49

4 4

52'30" 50'

52'30"

FEET

61

69

59

87°

N

000m FEET

30" 47'

49

49

49

4

4

44°

87°

44° 44°

000

33 35

38

000 E

49

49

49

49

49

000m

4

4 4

30"

30" 44°

45'

380

58

60

63

56

37

E 34 36 000

350

4 4

4 4 47'

50'

45'

66

56

39

32 40

49

49

49

000m

49

4

FEET

59

64

67

57

39 2

530

30"

49

49

49

49

49

4 4

4 4

30"

87°

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

OCONTO SE, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

OCONTO SE QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 16T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1999

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 34 ́

10 MILS

3° 57 ́

70 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

16T

DQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMAITON EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDAPHIS CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,409
<PP&E>                                          80,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 880,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           740
<OTHER-SE>                                     494,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   880,309
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,340
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,405)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (5,557)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,707)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
March 4, 1958

No. 61644.

Suit 4905.

#### Davies Turner & Co. *v.*United States.

Abstract 60191 reversed December 13, 1957. C. A. D. 669.
Wizards of the Coast Inc v. Rutter et al Doc. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
##### 



The Greenbrier Companies
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(in thousands)
    
    Exhibit 12.1
 Year ended August 31,2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005Earnings (loss) before income tax, minority
interest and equity in unconsolidated
subsidiaries
    
    $
    8,523
    
    
    $
    (47,230
    )
    
    $
    10,758
    
    
    $
    31,194
    
    
    $
    50,000Interest expense
    
    
    22,264
    
    
    
    19,055
    
    
    
    14,489
    
    
    
    11,553
    
    
    
    14,000Estimated interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    7,181
    
    
    
    6,287
    
    
    
    6,136
    
    
    
    5,388
    
    
    
    5,591$
    37,968
    
    
    $
    (21,888
    )
    
    $
    31,383
    
    
    $
    48,135
    
    
    $
    69,591Fixed charges
    
    $
    29,445
    
    
    $
    25,342
    
    
    $
    20,625
    
    
    $
    16,941
    
    
    $
    19,591Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.29
    
    
    
    (0.86
    )
    
    
    1.52
    
    
    
    2.84
    
    
    
    3.55
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Cdoor Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lavi Krasney of the
Company, CEO certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
13650, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Lavi Krasney
--------------------
Lavi Krasney
CEO
March 30, 2006
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 309

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with regard

to in-school personal safety education programsfor children.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 309

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas there were more than 84,000 confirmed cases of

sexual abuse in the United States in 1997 and 90 percent of the victims under 12 years old knew their offender;

Whereas 867,129 individuals were reported missing in 1999

and 85 to 90 percent of these missing persons were children;
2

•HCON 309 EH

Whereas according to Department of Justice research, there

are approximately 114,000 nonfamily abductions in any

one-year period;

Whereas a central element of the National Center for Missing

and Exploited Children’s (NCMEC) congressionally mandated mission is to prevent the victimization of children;

Whereas NCMEC examined the state of child safety education in the United States, focusing on what works and

what does not;

Whereas nearly every primary and secondary school in the

Nation conducts some sort of child safety education program, but NCMEC concluded that most such child safety

programs were inadequate to promote personal safety for

children;

Whereas guidelines, such as those developed by NCMEC, will

help ensure that educators and child-serving organizations have the best possible tools and information to

make decisions regarding child safety curriculum selection and development; and

Whereas child safety guidelines should be developed in collaboration with leading educational, public policy, and

child-serving organizations and the NCMEC’s guidelines

have been endorsed and are supported by many such organizations: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that States

4 should encourage their primary and secondary

5 schools to implement quality child safety curricula so
3

•HCON 309 EH

1 that each child receives instruction that is positive,

2 comprehensive, and effective; and

3 (2) the Congress recognizes the National Center

4 for Missing and Exploited Children’s ‘‘Guidelines for

5 Programs to Reduce Child Victimization’’ as one of

6 the tools to guide the selection of quality child safety

7 programs when local schools develop such programs.

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 56884.

#### Coro, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 143501-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of jewelry in chief value of artificial flowers the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Coro, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C.P. A. 154, C. A. D. 478), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 119

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 24, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by strik4 ing the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting

5 ‘‘October 30, 2000’’.

Æ
Applicant submits 

SF-424 in Grants.gov

Process Flow for Grant Recipients with Approved Awards

Applicant receives 

email that Grants.gov 

has validated the 

application

Applicant receives 

email that an Agency 

Tracking Number has 

been assigned to the 

application

Applicant receives 

email to create an 

Organization in ND 

Grants

Applicant completes 

and submits 

application in ND 

Grants

FEMA Application 

Review

Grantee Award Offer 

Review

Grantee 

declines 

award

Grantee 

accepts 

award

Award 

Declined

Award 

Accepted

Updates 

Required

Applicant receives 

email that 

application has been 

released for 

completion in ND 

Grants

Applicant receives 

email that application 

has been released 

for updates

Key

Task/Notification 

for Award

Task/Notification 

that is not always 

applicable

Action attached to 

a task

End result
Revised December 2014 

Contains Critical Energy Infrastructure Information 

- Do Not Release - 

ANNUAL SPILLWAY GATE OPERATION CERTIFICATE 

 FERC Project No. Project Name 

 Dam Name 

 Licensee or Exemptee 

1/ Category 1 – Failure has significant dam safety or operational consequences. 

 Category 2 – Failure has minimal or no consequences. 

2/ A close-up detailed inspection is required for all Category 1 Tainter gates every ten years. 

3/ A full open gate test must be performed at least once every five years for Category 1 gates and at least once 

every ten years for Category 2 gates. If the current opening was a full opening, this column should include the 

date of the current opening rather than the date of the previous full opening. 

4/ Examples are annual tests, full open tests, flood passage, and maintenance. 

5/ The item is required for Tainter gates only. 

6/ The voltage and current must be the values measured while the gate motors are under load and operating the 

gates rather than the rated values. 

Problems noted or maintenance required: 

 

The above gate(s) was (were) operated as indicated by: 

(Signature of operator)

 (Printed name of operator) 

Gate 

Category(1 

or 2)1/

Date of 

Most Recent 

Detailed 

Inspection 2/

Gate 

No. 

Motor 

No. 

Date of Opening Purpose of 

Gate 

Discharge 4/

Height of 

Opening 

(ft) 

Line-toLine 

Voltage 

5/, 6/

Phase Current 5/, 6/

Rated 

Horsepower 5/

Current Year’s 

Annual Test 

Last Full 

Opening3/ Startup Running 

 
Revised December 2014 

Contains Critical Energy Infrastructure Information 

- Do Not Release - 

ANNUAL SPILLWAY GATE OPERATION CERTIFICATE, Page 2 

LOAD TESTING OF STANDBY POWER 

Type of Emergency Operations 

 Manual 

 Standby power source – Describe 

 

Date of last test: 

Gate operated: 

Problems noted/ Maintenance required: 

 

The standby power source was load-tested as indicated by: 

 (Signature of operator)

 (Printed name of operator)

*********************************************************************************** 

Verification 

State of _______________________, 

County of _____________________, ss: 

The undersigned, being first duly sworn, states that he/she has read the above document and knows the 

contents of it, and that all of the statements contained in that document are true and correct, to the best 

of his/her knowledge and belief. 

 

 (Signature of appropriate company official) 

 

 (Printed name of appropriate company official) 

Sworn to me and subscribed before me this _____of ____________, 20___ 

Day Month 

 [SEAL] 

 

(Signature of Notary Public or other state or local 

official authorized by law to notarize documents)
No. 60667.

#### H. R. Benedict & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 195188-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic rutile, an earthy or mineral substance, not decorated in any manner, the same in all material respects as that the subject of *International Lapidaries Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 230, C. D. 1780), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

October 24, 1958

No. 62399.

#### G. A. Westphal Co., Inc., and Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310615-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of gift tags, composed wholly or in chief value of paper, lithographically printed, not over twelve one-thousandths of an inch in thickness, which are not gift or social cards, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:



| | (a) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |  |  |                                                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |     | 
|Date: March 16, 2009 |  | By: |  |  |  | /s/    CHARLES R. EYLER                                      
|                     |  |     |  |  |  | Charles R. Eyler Treasurer and Senior Vice President, Finance