alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. J. Res. 133

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘December 21, 2000’’ and by adding the following before the period in section 113: ‘‘, and in addition, from

within the amount provided by section 101, $217,000,000: Provided,

That of these funds, $100,000,000 may be made available only

pursuant to a certification by the Secretary of State that the United

Nations has taken no action in calendar year 2000 prior to the

date of enactment of this Act to increase funding for any United

Nations program without identifying an offsetting decrease elsewhere in the United Nations budget and cause the United Nations

to exceed the budget for the biennium 2000–2001 of $2,535,700,000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6794

JACKIE LOGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; GOVERNOR’S OFFICE; SENATE AND HOUSE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-03-143-6-24AK) Submitted: August 5, 2003 Decided: August 25, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie Logan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jackie Logan appeals the district court’s order dismissing without his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Logan that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Logan failed to present sufficiently specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Logan has waived appellate review by failing to file sufficiently specific objections after receiving proper notice. Logan’s objections were wholly conclusory in nature. Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 343 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 343

   Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of 
                       families eating together.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2000

   Mr. Rangel (for himself and Mr. McCollum) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of 
                       families eating together.

Whereas the use and abuse of illegal drugs, nicotine, and alcohol are the 
        greatest threat to the health and well-being of American children;
Whereas parental influence is one of the most crucial factors in determining the 
        likelihood of teenage substance abuse;
Whereas family dinners have long been a pillar of American family life;
Whereas the correlation between the frequency of family dinners and the risk of 
        substance abuse is well documented;
Whereas surveys conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance 
        Abuse at Columbia University have found, for each of the past 4 years, 
        that children and teenagers who routinely eat dinner with their families 
        are far less likely to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;
Whereas, according to these surveys, teenagers from families that seldom eat 
        dinner together are 72 percent more likely than the average teenager to 
        use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol, and teenagers from families 
        that eat dinner together are 31 percent less likely than the average 
        teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;
Whereas one method for families to eat dinner together more often would be for 
        them to select a recurring occasion for doing so, such as the third 
        Monday of each month; and
Whereas a National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-Children Day on Monday, June 19, 2000, 
        would encourage families to eat together: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) eating dinner together is a critical step for a family 
        in raising healthy, drug-free children; and
            (2) a National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-Children Day should be 
        established in order to encourage families to eat together as 
        often as possible.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23486]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-585-586 and 731-TA-1383-1384 (Review)]


Stainless Steel Flanges From China and India; Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty 
orders on stainless steel flanges from China and India would be likely 
to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry 
in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Randolph J. Stayin not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on May 1, 2023 (88 FR 
26592) and determined on August 4, 2023 that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (88 FR 63124, September 14, 2023).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on October 19, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5467 (October 2023), 
entitled Stainless Steel Flanges from China and India: Investigation 
Nos. 701-TA-585-586 and 731-TA-1383-1384 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 19, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-23486 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and, |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |   |                                  |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  April 15, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Darin M. Myman               |   |
|                            |   | Darin M. Myman                        |   |
|                            |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                            |   |                                  |   |
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 24, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Stephanie Weber, Assistant 
Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#490408092439253a672f3b2b67263b2e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="430e02032e332f306d2531216d2c3124">[email protected]</span></a>.
    1. Glacier Bancorp, Inc., Kalispell, Montana; to merge with 
Community Financial Group, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
Wheatland Bank, both of Spokane, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-23513 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**KPMG
                    LLP**
                Telephone
                314-444-1400Suite
                    900
                Fax
                312-444-147010
                    South Broadway
                Internet
                www.us.kpmg.comSt.
                    Louis, MO 63102-1761
    Independent
        Accountants' Report
  The
        Boards of Driectors
 CitiMortgage,
        Inc. and CitiMortgage Asset Management, Inc.:
  We
        have
        examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management
        assertion, that CitiMortgage,
        Inc. and subsidiaries and CitiMortgage Asset Management, Inc. (collectively
        referred to as the
        Company), complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
        Mortgage Bankers Association
        of America's *Uniform
        Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* as
        of and
        for the year ended
        December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
        with
        those minimum
        servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
        assertion about the
        Company's compliance based on our examination.
  Our
        examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
        by the American Institute
        of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on
        a test
        basis, evidence about
        the
        Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above
        and
        performing such
        other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
        that our examination provides
        a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
        determination on the Company's
        compliance with the minimum servicing standards.
  In
        our
        opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
        aforementioned minimum servicing
        standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated,
        in
        all material respects.
  
  St.
        Louis, Missouri
 March
        3,
        2006
  KPMG
        LLP,
        a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
 member
        firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SONDRA KRAUSE,

Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a for

profit Georgia corporation, and ERIC KING,

JANE DOE KING, and the marital

community comprised thereof,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5809JKA

ORDER

This case has been reassigned to the undersigned magistrate judge for the conduct of all

proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) on the consent of the

parties. The Court, after reviewing the record, does hereby order:

Defendants have filed a surreply, pursuant to Local Rule CR(7)(g) asking the court to strike

Plaintiff’s untimely responses/filings to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which was properly

noted for March 30, 2007. Considering the chronology of the filings it would be well within the court’s

power and discretion to simply strike the untimely material and deem Plaintiff’s failure to file a brief in

opposition to the motion an admission that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment has merit. 

However, the court feels it would be more appropriate to set Defendants’ motion for summary judgment

over to a subsequent date, to allow defendants a fair opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s arguments raised

in her opposition brief and materials submitted within the last few days. To ensure that Defendant’s time

was not wasted in filing their timely pleadings and to afford full credit to our local rules which require

Case 3:05-cv-05809-JKA Document 42 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

parties to adhere to the court deadlines in the administration of justice, the court is imposing costs against

Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel for the time it takes Defendants to review the untimely filed materials,

redraft, and refile their reply brief as well as the time it took to draft and file their surreply. The court has

previously imposed costs against Plaintiff due to Plaintiff’s failure to respond to discovery requests and a

motion to compel in a timely manner (Doc. 17). The court will impose the same hourly rate of

$171.00/hour, and Defendants shall provide the court an accounting of the extra time along with their

amended reply.

Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is renoted for April 6, 2007. Oral

argument will be held Thursday, April 5, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. Defendants’ reply brief should be filed by

Wednesday, April 4, 2007.

DATED this 30th day of March, 2007.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05809-JKA Document 42 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 2
# L_2022295EN.01004701.xml

| 16.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/47

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/2248

of 14 November 2022

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal by the Republic of Lithuania,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of Mr Rimantas ŠADŽIUS expired on 15 June 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of Mr Rimantas ŠADŽIUS expired on 15 June 2022.

| (2) | A member should therefore be appointed to the Court of Auditors, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member should therefore be appointed to the Court of Auditors,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 16 November 2022 to 15 November 2028.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 November 2022.

For the Council

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  Opinion of 18 October 2022 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
No. 66657.

#### Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/1490, etc. (New York).

*403Opinion by

Ford, J.

in accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon traveling bags similar in use to leather traveling bags and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00156-CR

Veronica Trevino, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. C-1-CR-15-206668

THE HONORABLE NANCY WRIGHT HOHENGARTEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due April 20, 2017. On counsel’s 

motions, the time for filing was extended to July 21, 2017. Appellant’s counsel has now filed a 

fourth motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the 

motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than August 21, 2017. No 

further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the 

referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on July 28, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 99.10



|     |  |                                 |  |                         
|---- |  | ------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|LOGO |  |                                 |  |                         
|     |  | KPMG LLP                        |  | Telephone (403) 691-8000
|     |  | 205 - 5th Avenue SW             |  | Fax (403) 691-8008      
|     |  | Suite 3100, Bow Valley Square 2 |  | www.kpmg.ca             
|     |  | Calgary AB                      |  |                         
|     |  | T2P 4B9                         |  |                         

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Penn West Petroleum Ltd.

We
consent to the use of our report, dated March 11, 2015, with respect to the 2014 consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such report in the registration statements (No. 33-171675) on Form F-3 of Penn West Petroleum Ltd.



LOGO

Chartered Professional Accountants

September 8, 2016

Calgary, Canada



| |  |                                                                                    |  | 
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
| |  | network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
| |  | (KPMG International), a Swiss entity.                                            |  | 
| |  | KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.                                         |  | 
| |  |                                                                                   
| |  | KPMG Confidential                                                                  |  |
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
registration statement.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
April 27, 1998
Before the First Division,

March 11, 1968

No. P68/122.

protest 64/23968 (New York).

#### Rolcor Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of certain varnish or ink pastes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Marset, Inc.,*and *W. J. Byrnes*& *Co. of N.Y., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 2400), wherein the merchandise was held to be an entirety, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Use/Volume Information

US Production of F1

108,500 kg/yr

31,500 kg/yr

29% of US Production Export (US + Import) 

87,000 kg/yr

AFFF

84,500 kg/yr

97% of US

Oilfield

(US Formulators)

840 kg/yr

1% of US

Fluorosurfactants

1660 kg/yr

2% of US

40 kg/yr Distributors

1620 kg/yr Formulators

25 % Industrial Us

380 kg/yr

70% Commercial U

1060 kg/yr 

5% Consumer Us

80 kg/yr Export

140 kg/yr

10,000 kg/yr

Import

US Production of F1

108,500 kg/yr

31,500 kg/yr

29% of US Production Export (US + Import) 

87,000 kg/yr

AFFF

84,500 kg/yr

97% of US

Oilfield

(US Formulators)

840 kg/yr

1% of US

Fluorosurfactants

1660 kg/yr

2% of US

40 kg/yr Distributors

1620 kg/yr Formulators

25 % Industrial Us

380 kg/yr

70% Commercial U

1060 kg/yr 

5% Consumer Us

80 kg/yr Export

140 kg/yr

10,000 kg/yr

Import