alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         November 15, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F58, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                              ( print page 73604)    

*Contact Person:*                         Mario Cerritelli, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F58, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5199,                         *cerritem@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 20, 2023.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-23626 Filed 10-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 00-4459

LARRY THOMAS REMINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge.

(CR-00-25-BR)

Submitted: January 16, 2001

Decided: February 5, 2001

Before: WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee. 
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Larry Thomas Remington appeals his sentence of fifty-seven

months’ imprisonment pursuant to his guilty plea to four counts of

sexual abuse of a minor. Because he did not object to the challenged

upward departure at sentencing, we review the sentence for plain

error. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-32 (1993);

United States v. Rolle, 204 F.3d 133, 138 (4th Cir. 2000). Finding no

such error, we affirm. 

Remington admitted having repeated sexual contact with the same

victim approximately once per week for four years. The district court

found that "[t]he guidelines used in this case neither consider the

number of occasions in which the defendant had sexual conduct with

a minor, nor do they take into account the duration of these encounters." (J.A. 44). The court, therefore, applied a five-level upward

departure for engaging in a pattern of activity involving the sexual

abuse of a minor pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§§ 5K2.0 and 2G2.2(b)(4) (1998). On appeal, Remington argues that

because he received a four-level multi-count adjustment, that the

court’s upward departure results in unreasonable double-counting. 

We conclude that the district court imposed the upward departure

based upon sexual conduct with a minor that was not accounted for

by the four charges to which Remington pled guilty. See United States

v. Amirault, 224 F.3d 9, 11 (9th Cir. 2000) (affirming application of

five-level upward departure under USSG §§ 5K2.0 and 2G2.2(b)(4)).

Therefore, we conclude the sentence did not amount to "doublecounting" of the same conduct. We have thoroughly reviewed the

briefs and record on appeal and find no reversible error. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. REMINGTON
No. 57823.

protest 205898-K (New York).

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When the case was called for trial, counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed prior to liquidation, the protest was dismissed as premature. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)
H. J. Res. 124

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘November 4, 2000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDAPHIS CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,675
<PP&E>                                          58,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,366
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           787
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,241
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,410
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               802,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (492,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (554,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,687
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (5,557)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (556,527)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (7.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (7.28)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2022132EN.01011001.xml

| 6.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 132/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 132/110

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2022/625 of 13 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 116 of 13 April 2022
  )

On page 2, in Article 1, in the new Article 2a, paragraph 1:

for:

‘1.   Article 2(2) shall not apply to funds or economic resources made available by organisations and agencies which are pillar-assed by the Union and ...’,

read:

‘1.   Article 2(2) shall not apply to funds or economic resources made available by organisations and agencies which are pillar-assessed by the Union and ...’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 407 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 407

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 To direct the Secretary of the Senate to correct technical errors in 
                       the enrollment of S. 1455.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 407

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1455), to enhance protections 
against fraud in the offering of financial assistance for college 
education, and for other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall 
make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 1, strike ``of 1999'' and insert ``of 
        2000''.
            (2) In section 3, strike ``base offense level for'' and 
        insert ``enhanced penalty the guidelines establish for a''.
            (3) In section 522(c)(4) of title 11, United States Code, 
        as amended by section 4(3) of the bill--
                    (A) strike ``obtaining or''; and
                    (B) strike ``Higher Education Act of 1954'' and 
                insert ``Higher Education Act of 1965''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 

IN RE: ) 

) RESOLUTION NO. 2006-05 

RESOLUTION ADOPTING ) 

REGULATION III RULE 3.21- ) 

INDUSTRIAL, INSTITUTIONAL, AND ) 

COMMERCIAL BOILERS, STEAM ) 

GENERA TORS, AND PROCESS ) 

HEATERS ) 

___________________________ ) 

WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code sections 40000, 40001, 40702, 40716 

and 40910 authorize the Feather River Air Quality Management District to adopt this proposed 

rule and regulation; and 

WHEREAS, this Resolution, and the Regulation set forth herein, was adopted after 

proceedings held in accordance with provisions of chapters 6 and 6.5 of part 3 of division 26 of 

the California Health and Safety Code (commencing with section 40700), and a duly noticed 

public hearing was held on June 5, 2006 to consider adoption of Regulation III, Rule 3.21 -

Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters; and 

WHEREAS, District staff has prepared a written analysis of the proposed Regulation III, 

Rule 3.21 - Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators and Process 

Heaters, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 40727.2, and has maintained a record of the 

rulemaking proceeding pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 40728; and 

WHEREAS, there is no indication at this time that Regulation III, Rule 3.21 is written in 

such a manner that the persons affected by it could not easily understand it; and 

WHEREAS, the proposed Regulation III, Rule 3.21 is in harmony with, and not in 

conflict with or contradictory to, existing statutes, court decisions, or State or federal regulations 

and any duplication with existing state or federal regulations is necessary or proper to execute 

the powers and duties of the Feather River Air Quality Management District; and 

WHEREAS, the proposed adoption of Regulation III, Rule 3.21 is not a project under 

the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15378 

because the action will not cause a direct adverse physical change to the environment or cause a 

reasonable foreseeable adverse physical change in the environment and that no further action is 

required under CEQA; and 
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the FEATHER 

RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT that effective JUNE 5, 2006, the Board 

adopts Regulation III Rule 3.21 - Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam 

Generators and Process Heaters to read in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit A to this resolution, 

attached hereto and made part hereof. 

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Feather River Air Quality Management District at a 

meeting on June 5, 2006, by the following vote: 

AYES: Directors Griego, Montna, Silva, Munger, Epp. Kitchen, Pendergraph 

and Nicoletti 

NOES: None 

ABSENT: Directors Schrader and Ramirez ABSTAIN: None lk2L 

Chairman 

ATTEST: 

CLERK OF THE DISTRICT BOARD 

APPROVED FOR LEGAL FORM 

Gcx1L 

J. L . D. . L 1 1 Ad . !ill eWIS, !Strtct ega VISOr
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN TRUJILLO, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. LOU ARCHULETA; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents - Appellees. No. 15-1326 (D.C. No. 1:15-CV-01061-LTB) (D. Colo.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Before LUCERO , O’BRIEN , and GORSUCH , Circuit Judges.
John Trujillo, a state prisoner proceed ing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the district court’s determination that his most recent 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application is an unauthorized second or successive § 2254 application that it lacked jurisdiction to consider. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). We deny a COA and di smiss this matter. Mr. Trujillo was convicted of first degree murder in 1995. He filed his first § 2254 habeas action in 2004, which was dismissed for lack of merit. Most recently,

* This order is not binding precedent excep t under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and colla teral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### December 3, 2015
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - he filed another § 2254 action that was dismissed by the di strict court for lack of jurisdiction. Trujillo v. Archuleta , No. 15-CV-1061-LTB, slip op. at 4 (D. Colo. Aug. 14, 2015). The court recognized that Mr. Trujillo had not obtained authorization from this cour t to file a second or succes sive application and his application should either be di smissed for lack or jurisdic tion or transferred to this court. The court examined Mr. Trujillo’s claim that a s ecret plea agreement between the prosecution and the key witnesses agai nst him at trial al legedly tainted his conviction and concluded th e claim lacked merit. See § 2244(b)(2)(A),(B) (requiring a second or successive applicant to demons trate that his claim is based on either a new rule of constitutional law or newly di scovered evidence that establishes by clear and convincing evidence that he is not guilty). It thus declined to transfer the application to this court. See In re Cline , 531 F.3d 1249, 1251 (10th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (one factor to consider in deciding whethe r to transfer an action is whether the claim is like ly to have merit). To obtain a COA, Mr. Tr ujillo must show “that juri sts of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of re ason would find it debatable wh ether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Reasonable jurists could not debate the district court’ s decision to dismiss.- 3 - We deny a COA and dismiss this matter. We grant Mr. Trujillo’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of costs or fees and remind him that he is obligated to make m onthly payments until the filing and docket fees are paid in full.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
```
SPEAKERSCONTENTSINSERTS
```

```
Page 1TOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 2PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 3PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 4PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 5PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 6PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 7PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 8PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 9PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 10PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 11PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 12PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 13PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 14PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 15PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 16PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 17PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 18PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 19PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 20PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 21PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 22PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 23PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 24PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 25PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 26PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 27PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 28PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 29PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 30PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 31PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 32PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 33PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 34PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 35PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 36PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 37PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 38PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 39PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 40PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 41PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 42PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 43PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 44PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 45PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 46PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 47PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 48PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 49PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 50PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 51PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 52PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 53PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 54PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 55PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 56PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 57PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 58PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 59PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 60PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 61PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 62PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 63PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 64PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 65PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 66PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 67PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 68PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 69PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 70PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 60

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a series of commemorative postage

stamps should be issued honoring veterans service organizations across

the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. DINGELL (for himself, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. DELAY, Mr. BONIOR, Mr.

HYDE, Mr. FROST, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. EVANS, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. MOORE,

Mr. HILL of Indiana, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. JENKINS, Mr.

ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr.

BERMAN, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. TALENT, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr.

FILNER, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr.

TRAFICANT, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JOHN, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. FARR of California,

Mr. CROWLEY, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. DICKEY, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. BUYER, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. COYNE, Mr. BALDACCI, Mr. GREEN

of Texas, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. NEY, Mr. CLYBURN, and Mr. LUTHER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a series of commemorative postage stamps should be issued honoring

veterans service organizations across the United States.

Whereas the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States,

which was formed by veterans of the Spanish-American

War and the Philippine Insurrection to help secure rights
2

•HCON 60 IH

and benefits for their service, celebrates its 100th anniversary in 1999;

Whereas American service personnel have fought, bled, and

died in every war, conflict, police action, and military

intervention in which the United States has engaged during this century;

Whereas over history, veterans service organizations have

ably represented the interests of veterans in Congress

and State legislatures across the Nation, and established

networks of trained service officers who, at no charge,

have helped millions of veterans and their families secure

the education, disability compensation, and health care

benefits they are rightfully entitled to receive as a result

of the military service performed by those veterans; and

Whereas veterans service organizations have been deeply involved in countless local community service projects and

have been constant reminders of the American ideals of

duty, honor, and national service: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a series of commemorative postage stamps in

5 1999 honoring the legacy and the continuing con6 tributions of veterans service organizations to Amer7 ica; and

8 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

9 should recommend to the Postmaster General that
3

•HCON 60 IH

1 such a series of commemorative postage stamps be

2 issued.

Æ