# L_2022152EN.01010901.xml

| 3.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 152/109 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 152/109

---

DECISION (EU) 2022/871 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 30 May 2022

amending Council Decision 2003/17/EC as regards its period of application and as regards the equivalence of field inspections carried out in Bolivia on cereal seed-producing crops and oil and fibre plant seed-producing crops and the equivalence of cereal seed and oil and fibre plant seed produced in Bolivia

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Decision 2003/17/EC (3) provides that, under certain conditions, field inspections carried out on certain seed-producing crops in the third countries listed in Annex I to that Decision are to be considered equivalent to field inspections carried out in accordance with Union law. It also provides that, under certain conditions, seed of certain species produced in those third countries is to be considered equivalent to seed produced in accordance with Union law. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Decision 2003/17/EC (3) provides that, under certain conditions, field inspections carried out on certain seed-producing crops in the third countries listed in Annex I to that Decision are to be considered equivalent to field inspections carried out in accordance with Union law. It also provides that, under certain conditions, seed of certain species produced in those third countries is to be considered equivalent to seed produced in accordance with Union law.

| (2) | Equivalence has been granted to those third countries by relying on the multilateral framework for international trade of seeds, namely the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Seed Schemes for the Varietal Certification of Seed moving in International Trade and the methods of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) or, where appropriate, the rules of the Association of Official Seed Analysts that are equivalent to the ISTA methods. The Commission has also carried out legislative assessments and audits in some of those third countries in order to verify whether they meet the requirements under Union law before granting equivalence for the first time. Annual testing and reporting within the OECD framework, periodical re-auditing of laboratories for ISTA accreditation, as well as official inspections in the context of Union law, indicate that field inspections carried out in those third countries continue to afford the same guarantees as field inspections carried out by Member States and that seed produced and certified in those third countries continues to afford the same guarantees as seed produced and certified in Member States. Those field inspections and seed should therefore continue to be considered equivalent to Union field inspections and seed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Equivalence has been granted to those third countries by relying on the multilateral framework for international trade of seeds, namely the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Seed Schemes for the Varietal Certification of Seed moving in International Trade and the methods of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) or, where appropriate, the rules of the Association of Official Seed Analysts that are equivalent to the ISTA methods. The Commission has also carried out legislative assessments and audits in some of those third countries in order to verify whether they meet the requirements under Union law before granting equivalence for the first time. Annual testing and reporting within the OECD framework, periodical re-auditing of laboratories for ISTA accreditation, as well as official inspections in the context of Union law, indicate that field inspections carried out in those third countries continue to afford the same guarantees as field inspections carried out by Member States and that seed produced and certified in those third countries continues to afford the same guarantees as seed produced and certified in Member States. Those field inspections and seed should therefore continue to be considered equivalent to Union field inspections and seed.

| (3) | In 2016 Bolivia submitted a request to the Commission for the granting of equivalence to its system of field inspections of seed-producing crops and to seed of Sorghum spp. (sorghum), Zea mays (maize) and Helianthus annuus (sunflower) produced and certified in Bolivia. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In 2016 Bolivia submitted a request to the Commission for the granting of equivalence to its system of field inspections of seed-producing crops and to seed of Sorghum spp. (sorghum), Zea mays (maize) and Helianthus annuus (sunflower) produced and certified in Bolivia.

| (4) | The Commission assessed the relevant legislation of Bolivia, carried out an audit in 2018 concerning the system of official controls of seed production and seed certification of sorghum, maize and sunflower in Bolivia, and their equivalence with Union requirements, and published the audit’s findings in a report entitled ‘Final report of an audit carried out in the Plurinational State of Bolivia from 14 March 2018 to 22 March 2018 in order to evaluate the system of official controls and certification of seed and their equivalence with European Union requirements’. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Commission assessed the relevant legislation of Bolivia, carried out an audit in 2018 concerning the system of official controls of seed production and seed certification of sorghum, maize and sunflower in Bolivia, and their equivalence with Union requirements, and published the audit’s findings in a report entitled ‘Final report of an audit carried out in the Plurinational State of Bolivia from 14 March 2018 to 22 March 2018 in order to evaluate the system of official controls and certification of seed and their equivalence with European Union requirements’.

| (5) | That audit showed that there is a well-organised system for seed production and certification in Bolivia. The Commission identified some shortcomings and provided recommendations to Bolivia. Since Bolivia addressed those shortcomings by 30 November 2018, it satisfies the conditions set out in Annex II to Decision 2003/17/EC and the respective requirements set out in Council Directives 66/402/EEC (4) and 2002/57/EC (5). |
| --- | --- |

(5)

That audit showed that there is a well-organised system for seed production and certification in Bolivia. The Commission identified some shortcomings and provided recommendations to Bolivia. Since Bolivia addressed those shortcomings by 30 November 2018, it satisfies the conditions set out in Annex II to Decision 2003/17/EC and the respective requirements set out in Council Directives 66/402/EEC (4) and 2002/57/EC (5).

| (6) | Therefore, it is appropriate to grant equivalence as regards field inspections carried out in respect of seed-producing crops of sorghum, maize and sunflower in Bolivia and as regards seed of sorghum, maize and sunflower produced in Bolivia and officially certified by its authorities. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Therefore, it is appropriate to grant equivalence as regards field inspections carried out in respect of seed-producing crops of sorghum, maize and sunflower in Bolivia and as regards seed of sorghum, maize and sunflower produced in Bolivia and officially certified by its authorities.

| (7) | As Decision 2003/17/EC will expire on 31 December 2022, the period for which equivalence is recognised under that Decision should be extended, in order to avoid any risk of disruption of imports of seed into the Union. Taking into consideration the investment and the time needed for the production of seed certified in accordance with Union law, it is appropriate to extend that period by seven years. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

As Decision 2003/17/EC will expire on 31 December 2022, the period for which equivalence is recognised under that Decision should be extended, in order to avoid any risk of disruption of imports of seed into the Union. Taking into consideration the investment and the time needed for the production of seed certified in accordance with Union law, it is appropriate to extend that period by seven years.

| (8) | Decision 2003/17/EC should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Decision 2003/17/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Amendments to Decision 2003/17/EC

Decision 2003/17/EC is amended as follows:

| (1) | in Article 6, the date ‘31 December 2022’ is replaced by the date ‘31 December 2029’; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in Article 6, the date ‘31 December 2022’ is replaced by the date ‘31 December 2029’;

| (2) | the table in Annex I is amended as follows:






  (a) | the following row is inserted between the rows ‘AU’ and ‘BR’:







  ‘BO | Ministry of Rural Development and Land |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bolivia |
| Av. Camacho entre calles Loaya y Bueno No 1471, LA PAZ |

(2)

the table in Annex I is amended as follows:

(a)

the following row is inserted between the rows ‘AU’ and ‘BR’:

‘BO

Ministry of Rural Development and Land

Bolivia

Av. Camacho entre calles Loaya y Bueno No 1471, LA PAZ

66/402/EEC – only in respect of Zea mays and Sorghum spp.;

Zea mays

Sorghum

2002/57/EC – only in respect of Helianthus annuus’;

Helianthus annuus

| (b) | in footnote (1), the following terms are inserted between ‘AU – Australia,’ and ‘BR – Brazil,’: | ‘BO – Bolivia,’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

in footnote (1), the following terms are inserted between ‘AU – Australia,’ and ‘BR – Brazil,’:

(1

‘BO – Bolivia,’;

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Article 3

Addressees

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 May 2022.

For the European Parliament

The President

R. METSOLA

For the Council

The President

B. LE MAIRE

---

(1)  Opinion of 23 March 2022 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  Position of the European Parliament of 5 April 2022 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 16 May 2022.

2

(3)  Council Decision 2003/17/EC of 16 December 2002 on the equivalence of field inspections carried out in third countries on seed-producing crops and on the equivalence of seed produced in third countries (OJ L 8, 14.1.2003, p. 10).

3

(4)  Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (OJ P 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2309).

4

(5)  Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 74).

5

---