alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 131 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 131

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
provide a new procedure for appointment of Electors for the election of 
                   the President and Vice President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2000

Mr. Engel introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
provide a new procedure for appointment of Electors for the election of 
                   the President and Vice President.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of final passage of this joint 
resolution:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. In an election for President or Vice President, each 
State shall appoint a number of Electors to vote for each candidate for 
President or Vice President that bears the same ratio to the total 
number of Electors of that State as the number of votes received by 
that candidate bears to the total number of votes cast in that State. 
Each State shall make computations for purposes of carrying out this 
section in accordance with such laws as it may adopt, including laws 
providing for the allocation of Electors among more than two candidates 
receiving 5 percent or more of the total number of votes cast in the 
State under such criteria as the State may by law establish, except 
that fractional numbers less than one one-thousandth shall be 
disregarded. The person having the greatest number of Electors 
appointed after Electors are appointed from all States shall be the 
President.
    ``Section 2. For purposes of this article, the District 
constituting the seat of Government of the United States shall be 
treated as if it were a State, except that the District may not appoint 
a number of Electors greater than the number of Electors appointed by 
the least populous State.
    ``Section 3. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article by appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 4. This article shall apply with regard to any election 
for President or Vice President that is held more than one year after 
the date of the ratification of this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

September 15, 1952

No. 56863.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 176891-K, 176892-K, and 175979-K (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Coughlin Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and *Gillette Safety Razor Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - XXXX - XXXX Directorate ID: 2010 - SW - 109 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. Model 204B, 205A, 205A - 1, 205B, 210, 212, 412, 412CF, 412EP Helicopters . Number of He licopters (U.S. Operators): 265 Reason : This AD was prompted by another incident in which the blade tip weight separated from a blade during flight, causing vibration. This incident led to the determination that additional blades could be affected and sho uld be added to the applicability. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of the blade tip weight, loss of a blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 38,000 to remove and replace blade Labor per Helicopter ( XX x $8 5 /work - hour) 2.0 hrs x $85 hr = $170 per inspection for blades with certain serial numbers . 6.0 hrs x $85 hr = $510 to remove and replace blades. Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter Inspections alone: $170; Repair costs: $38, 51 0 Total US Fleet Cost Inspections: $45,050; Repair costs : $1,347,850, assuming 35 helicopters will need blades replaced. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Martin Crane
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-79255 of Starmedia Network, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated April 7,
2000 appearing in this Current Report on Form 8-K/A of Starmedia Network,
Inc. under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE
Mexico, D.F., Mexico
June 19, 2000
No. 50803.

#### Protest 108103-K of Ignaz Strauss & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of jars the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 50327. In accordance therewith and following the decision cited, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at 70 percent ad valorem under paragraph 212 without the additional assessment of 10 cents per dozen pieces.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 158 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.158
                                         Agreed to July 21, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas on July 24, 1998, a lone gunman entered the United States 
  Capitol through the door known as the Document Door, located on the 
  first floor of the East Front;

Whereas Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut was the first United States 
  Capitol Police officer to confront the gunman just inside the 
  Document Door and lost his life as a result;

Whereas Detective John Michael Gibson also confronted the gunman and 
  lost his life in the ensuing shootout;

Whereas the last shot fired by Detective John Gibson--his final act as 
  an officer of the law--finally brought down the gunman and ended his 
  deadly rampage;

Whereas while the gunman's intentions are not fully known, nor may ever 
  be known, it is clear that he would have killed more innocent people 
  if United States Capitol Police Officer Jacob Chestnut and Detective 
  John Gibson had not ended the violent rampage;

Whereas the United States Capitol Police represent true dedication and 
  professionalism in their duties to keep the United States Capitol and 
  the Senate and House of Representatives office buildings safe for all 
  who enter them;

Whereas the United States Capitol shines as a beacon of freedom and 
  democracy all around the world;

Whereas keeping the sacred halls of the United States Capitol, known as 
  the People's House, accessible for all the people of the United 
  States and the world is a true testament of Congress and of our 
  Nation's dedication to upholding the virtues of freedom;

Whereas the door near where this tragic incident took place has been 
  known as the Document Door; and

Whereas it is fitting and appropriate that the Document Door henceforth 
  be known as the Memorial Door in honor of Officer Jacob Chestnut and 
  Detective John Gibson: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the door known as the Document Door and located on the first floor 
of the East Front of the United States Capitol is designated as the 
``Memorial Door'' in honor of Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut and 
Detective John Michael Gibson of the United States Capitol Police, who 
gave their lives in the line of duty on July 24, 1998, near that door.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Exhibit
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO\


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard J. Kampa,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of  1934;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
December 1, 2009








/s/
      Richard J. KampaRichard
      J. Kampa,
              Chief
      Executive Officer
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 77

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued by the United States Postal Service honoring the members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mr. SHOWS (for himself, Mr. LAMPSON, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. SISISKY, Mr.

ETHERIDGE, Mr. MOORE, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. GOODE, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr.

HOLDEN, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Ms. DANNER, Mr. TAYLOR of

Mississippi, Mr. BALDACCI, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. OLVER, Mr. PICKERING, Mr.

DINGELL, Mr. FROST, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr.

CLEMENT, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. FILNER, Ms.

LOFGREN, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. BUYER, Mr. STENHOLM,

Mr. QUINN, Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. BERMAN,

Mr. SNYDER, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. GREEN

of Wisconsin, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. HILL of

Indiana, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. KILPATRICK, and Ms. MCKINNEY) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued by the United States

Postal Service honoring the members of the Armed

Forces who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

Whereas the Order of the Purple Heart for Military Merit,

commonly known as the Purple Heart, is the oldest military decoration in the world in present use;
2

•HCON 77 IH

Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the

President of the United States to members of the Armed

Forces who are wounded in conflict with an enemy force

or while held by an enemy force as a prisoner of war, and

posthumously to the next of kin of members of the

Armed Forces who are killed in conflict with an enemy

force or who die of a wound received in conflict with an

enemy force;

Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7,

1782, during the Revolutionary War, when General

George Washington issued an order establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the

Badge of Military Merit or the Decoration of the Purple

Heart;

Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end

of the War of the Revolution, but was revived out of respect for the memory and military achievements of

George Washington in 1932, the year marking the 200th

anniversary of his birth; and

Whereas 1999 is the year marking the 200th anniversary of

the death of George Washington: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 the members of the Armed Forces who have been

6 awarded the Purple Heart; and

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

8 should recommend to the Postmaster General that
3

•HCON 77 IH

1 such a stamp be issued in 1999, the year marking

2 the 200th anniversary of the death of George Wash3 ington.

Æ
No. 58822.

protest 229072-K (New York).

#### James E. Ring *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It appearing from the papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)
No. P67/378.

#### S. S. Sarna, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 65/23722 (New York).

Rao, O. J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of brass bell incense burners and similar brass articles or brass brackets the same in all material repects as the merchandise the subject of *S. S.*Sarna, *Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 444, Abstract 64135), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                          26,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,503
<INVENTORY>                                    926,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,029,231
<PP&E>                                       1,650,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                 641,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,272,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,037,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           306
<OTHER-SE>                                     705,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,272,399
<SALES>                                      2,383,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,393,119
<CGS>                                        1,783,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,347,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       789
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,707)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  30,974
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,267
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Schuff Steel Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
our report dated February 8, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Schuff Steel Company included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
June 30, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-23-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-06-1997
<CASH>                                           9,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,086
<INVENTORY>                                    368,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               483,719
<PP&E>                                       1,008,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                 423,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,145,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          346,881
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           339
<OTHER-SE>                                     356,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,145,153
<SALES>                                      1,266,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,272,817
<CGS>                                          982,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,237,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,793
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 376 Agreed to October 19, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas our rights and liberties are rooted in the cherished documents that gave birth to our nation, those being the Declaration

of Independence and the United States Constitution with its

Bill of Rights;

Whereas the patriot James Madison, fourth President of the United

States, was the major author of the Virginia Plan, the model

and the basis for that United States Constitution that emerged

from the Constitutional Convention in 1787;

Whereas James Madison kept detailed written records of the

debates and compromises that were in integral part of that

Convention of 1787, which records were published only after

the death of all delegates to the Convention;

Whereas James Madison wrote many of the newspaper articles

now known as the Federalist Papers, outlining why States should

endorse the new Constitution and enduring as some of the best

arguments for our form of government;

Whereas James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights into the

1st Congress of the United States, whereupon the first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted; and

Whereas it is altogether fitting that the 16th day of March, the

birthday of the distinguished founding father, James Madison,

would serve as a fitting reminder of Liberty Day, a celebration

of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, where our unalienable rights and liberties are enumerated: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

(1) a Liberty Day should be celebrated each year in the

United States as a remembrance of both the freedom that

Americans were given in the Declaration of Independence and

the extraordinary rights and liberties that Americans were

given in their Constitution; and

(2) all elected and previously-elected representatives of the

people who voluntarily give of their time to speak to Americans
H. Con. Res. 376—2

about those founding documents, in furtherance of that remembrance of our freedom, our rights and our liberties, deserve

our thanks.

Attest:

JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

By

Deputy Clerk.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
No. 58796.

protest 230126-K (New York).

#### H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

*295Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steely spikes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc.,*and *Daniel F. Young, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 124, C. D. 1593), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 31

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the right to life.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. SMITH of New

Jersey, Mr. BARCIA, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr.

HAYES, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky, and Mr.

PHELPS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the right to life.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the

4 following article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 31 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of final passage

2 of this joint resolution:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. With respect to the right to life, the

5 word ‘person’ as used in this article and in the fifth and

6 fourteenth articles of amendment to the Constitution of

7 the United States applies to all human beings irrespective

8 of age, health, function, or condition of dependency, in9 cluding their unborn offspring at every stage of their bio10 logical development.

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. No unborn person shall be deprived of

12 life by any person: Provided, however, That nothing in this

13 article shall prohibit a law permitting only those medical

14 procedures required to prevent the death of the mother.

15 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress and the several States

16 shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate leg17 islation.’’

Æ
From: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov, eddinger.jim@epa.gov, jones.toni@epa.gov Cc: David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US Date: 10/17/2011 12:57 PM Subject: Boiler/CISWI Briefing. Call - in number (919) 541 -4486 (See attached file: Agenda for October 17 OMB Briefing V2.docx)
Before The Second Division,

October 28, 1958

No. 62403.

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 314342-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hand-embroidered articles, not wearing apparel, in part of machine-made lace, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59733, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.