alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-~ 

nRCIES 

ftonr concept to connpleNon 

U.S. Depat`tment of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

May 27, 2015 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11147A issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory DocketNo. FAA-2014- 10 10. 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

enrGies Inc. currently holds Exemptions ntunbered 11147 and 11147A (hereinafter the Exemption) issued for the 

purpose of performing Aerial Data Collection. enrGies Inc. herby requests an amendment to that Exemption to 

include additional small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the 

Exemption to support client requests (public interest). 

The requested systems (under the same terms and conditions contained in the original Exemption) are cited below. 

1. Parrot, sense Fly — eBee; 

2. Aeryon Labs — SkyRanger and Scout; 

3. AIBOTIX — X6; 

4. Physical Sciences Inc., Tactical Robotics — InstantEye; 

5. DJI—Phantom3, S800, S900 and S1000 

All of the requested sUAS have been previously approved tluough the 333 exemption process for other 

organizations and manuals are on file. enrGies Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) and other 

technical documentation was provided in our initial request. enrGies states that no conditions or limitations from 

our original request have changed and all operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms 

of the Exemption. 

As this is an amendment to our existing exemption, enrGies Inc. respectfally submits that good cause exists so that 

notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. 

Please contact Mr. Philip Owen, Director of UAS Operations @ 256-759-0181, philowen@enrgies.com or Jeff 

Lemasters, Director of Business Development @ 850-581-4422 jefflemasters@enrgies.com should you have any 

question concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption. 

~ 

~ 

L. terc 

President 

enrGies Inc. 

256-357-5519 

cc: 

Robert Pappas 

Thuy Cooper 

Dan Ngo 

Phil Owen 

Jeff Lemasters 

7220 Governors West, Huntsville, AL. 35806, www.enrgies.com
No. 52096.

protests 125673-K, etc.(Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of rhubarb similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(19 Cust. Ct. 12, C. D. 1060) the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 752 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the report on Form 10-K of NCI, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, to the
best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                    | 
|Date: March 7, 2008 |  | /s/ CHARLES K. NARANG                            
|                    |  | Charles K. Narang                                
|                    |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
|                    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                    

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

November 1, 1961

No. 66183.

#### Frank Kraus and F. C. Gerlach & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/24645, etc. (New York).

*353Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper needle holders the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 63099, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

   CERTIFICATION OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2004, PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:

-     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and

-     the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a part
of the Form 10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated: September 10, 2004

                                                   /s/ KENNETH C. BUDDE
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                     Kenneth C. Budde
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

                                       70
No. 63938.

protest 59/1320 (New York).

#### Seidler Cravats *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
                      JANUARY 31, 2004, PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:

-    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934, and

-    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.


This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a part
of the Form 10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  March 11, 2004





                                                     /s/ WILLIAM E. ROWE
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                       William E. Rowe
                                                    Chairman of the Board
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                        and President


                                                    /s/ KENNETH C. BUDDE
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Kenneth C. Budde
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


                                       52
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



/S/    J. NICK
RIEHLEJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer


March 3, 2009
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-38
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-38


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Before the Third Division,

March 14, 1960

No. 63949.

protests 59/102, etc. (New York).

#### Alexanders Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351), and that the case or cases, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the case or cases of merchandise, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          44,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,951
<INVENTORY>                                      6,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,056
<PP&E>                                       1,295,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,229,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,494
<BONDS>                                          6,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     453,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,229,882
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,459
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,084
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 59889.

#### James Barclay & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 276453-K (B), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.,*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Milton G. Silva-Craig., the Chief Executive Officer of Technology Solutions Company,certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technology Solutions Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: May 15, 2007  By: /s/ MILTON G. SILVA-CRAIG         Milton G. Silva-Craig        Chief Executive Officer
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SAUL VILLASENO NIETO,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 04-563M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Possession of Cocaine With Intent to Distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)

and 841(b)(1)(B).

Date of Detention Hearing: May 24, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The Court and defendant have been advised that a detainer will be placed on

defendant by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer to be

lodged against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change

in circumstances.

Case 2:06-cr-00190-MJP Document 6 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than

detention that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 24th day of May, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cr-00190-MJP Document 6 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Vincent Verdiramo, President of Serino 6, Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: September 20, 2006: /s/ Vincent Verdiramo ___________________________  President
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 106

To disapprove a final rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection

Agency concerning water pollution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 2000

Mr. DICKEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

JOINT RESOLUTION

To disapprove a final rule promulgated by the Environmental

Protection Agency concerning water pollution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to water pollution

5 under the total maximum daily load program (65 Fed.

6 Reg. 43586), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

Æ
No. 52437.

protests 819908-G, etc. (New York).

#### Heinsheimer Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*172Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# L_2022024DE.01013701.xml

| 3.2.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 24/137 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 24/137

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2022/112 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 25. Januar 2022 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) 2017/746 hinsichtlich der Übergangsbestimmungen für bestimmte In-vitro-Diagnostika und des späteren Geltungsbeginns der Bedingungen für hausinterne Produkte

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 19 vom 28. Januar 2022
  )

Auf Seite 6, Unterschrift:

Anstatt:

„Im Namen des Europäischen Parlaments

Der Präsident

R. METSOLA
  “

muss es heißen:

„Im Namen des Europäischen Parlaments

Die Präsidentin

R. METSOLA
  “.

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
2. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
3. The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.



|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation               
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                         
|       |                                                         
|       |                                                         
|By:    | /S/ Kelly Tucek                                         
|       |                                                         
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                             
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and               
|       | principal financial officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.
|Date:  | August 11, 2005
No. 63490.

protest 59/12 (New York).

#### Bryant & Heffernan, Inc. *v.*United States

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.