alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Lock-Up Agreement

Gentlemen:

     As part of the  sale of the  shares  of  Common  Stock  of XYZ  Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") to the undersigned (the "Holder"), the Holder hereby
represents,  warrants,  covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the Company and
the  holders  of record  (the  "third  party  beneficiaries")  of the  Company's
outstanding  securities,  including the Company's Common Stock,  $.001 par value
(the  "Stock")  at the date  hereof  and  during  the  pendency  of this  letter
agreement  that the Holder will not transfer,  sell,  contract to sell,  devise,
gift, assign, pledge, hypothecate, distribute or grant any option to purchase or
otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, its shares of Stock of the Company
owned  beneficially  or otherwise  by the Holder  except in  connection  with or
following  completion of a merger or  acquisition by the Company and the Company
is no longer  classified as a blank check company as defined in Section  7(b)(3)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

     Any  attempted  sale,  transfer or other  disposition  in violation of this
letter agreement shall be null and void.

     The Holder  further  agrees that the Company (i) will instruct its transfer
agent not to  transfer  such  securities  (ii) may provide a copy of this letter
agreement to the Company's  transfer  agent for the purpose of  instructing  the
Company's transfer agent to place a legend on the certificate(s)  evidencing the
securities subject hereto and disclosing that any transfer,  sale,  contract for
sale, devise,  gift,  assignment,  pledge or hypothecation of such securities is
subject to the terms of this letter agreement and (iii) will issue stop-transfer
instructions  to its transfer agent for the period  contemplated  by this letter
agreement for such securities.

     This letter agreement shall be binding upon the Holder, its agents,  heirs,
successors, assigns and beneficiaries.

     Any waiver by the Company of any of the terms and conditions of this letter
agreement  in any instance  must be in writing and must be duly  executed by the
Company  and the Holder and shall not be deemed or  construed  to be a waiver of
such term or condition for the future, or of any subsequent breach thereof.


<PAGE>


     The Holder agrees that any breach of this letter  agreement  will cause the
Company and the third party beneficiaries  irreparable damage for which there is
no  adequate  remedy at law. If there is a breach or  threatened  breach of this
letter  agreement by the Holder,  the Holder  hereby agrees that the Company and
the third party  beneficiaries shall be entitled to the issuance of an immediate
injunction  without  notice to restrain  the breach or  threatened  breach.  The
Holder also agrees that the Company and all third party  beneficiaries  shall be
entitled to pursue any other  remedies for such a breach or  threatened  breach,
including a claim for money damages.

THE HOLDER

/s/ Signature of Holder
-----------------------
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12(A)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        26 WEEKS
                                         ENDED
                                        12/29/01                              YEAR ENDED
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)             (UNAUDITED)      2001         2000         1999         1998         1997
-------------------------------------  -----------    --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
<S>                                    <C>            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Fixed Charges
  Interest and amortization of debt
  issuance costs on all indebtedness     $ 23,061     $ 39,043     $ 31,102     $ 15,864     $  7,336     $  4,967

  Add interest element implicit in
  rentals                                   2,011        3,724        1,923        1,158          521          394
                                         --------     --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
    Total fixed charges                  $ 25,072     $ 42,767     $ 33,025     $ 17,022     $  7,857     $  5,361

Income
  Income before income taxes             $ 45,319     $ 73,846     $146,903     $ 53,863     $ 32,186     $  6,400
  Add fixed charges                        25,072       42,767       33,025       17,022        7,857        5,361
                                         --------     --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
  Income before fixed charges and
  income taxes                           $ 70,391     $116,613     $179,928     $ 70,885     $ 40,043     $ 11,761
                                         ========     ========     ========     ========     ========     ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges           2.81         2.73         5.45         4.16         5.10         2.19
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                           3,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                       781
<INVENTORY>                                      8,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,883
<PP&E>                                          11,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,490
<BONDS>                                          1,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,049
<SALES>                                         36,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,739
<CGS>                                           34,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (14,981)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                       484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                668
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

April 17, 1957

No. 60666.

#### Arista Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 298084-K (New York).

*476Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53874.

Suit 4615.

#### United States *v.*Fries Bros., Inc.

C. D. 1135 affirmed November 7, 1949. C. A. D. 416.
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0144 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT L. WITHEROW ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 7 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 15 2022

06/15/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0144
A89A1998.

#### KALUSTIAN v. McDONALD.

(390 SE2d 657)

Decided February 7, 1990.

Ralph Kalustian, *pro se.*

*E. Crawford McDonald, Robert B. Wedge,*for appellee.

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant, acting *pro se,*filed a legal malpractice suit against appellee/attorney arising from appellee’s representation of appellant in a criminal matter. With his answer, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for appellant’s failure to file with his complaint the statutorily-required supporting affidavit of an expert. See OCGA § 9-11-9.1. The trial court granted appellee’s motion, and this appeal followed.

The trial court did not err in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss. *Frazier v. Merritt,*190 Ga. App. 832 (2) (380 SE2d 495) (1989), Contrary to appellant’s assertions, OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (b), the statutory exception to the requirement that the affidavit accompany the complaint, is inapplicable since appellant’s case was not filed within ten days of the expiration of the statute of limitation. Furthermore, neither appellant’s indigency nor the pendency of discovery matters was a barrier to the trial court’s dismissal of the malpractice action for failure to comply with OCGA § 9-11-9.1.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 441

Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the investigation into the

terrorist attack on the U.S.S. COLE on October 12, 2000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 13, 2000

Mr. RILEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the investigation into the terrorist attack on the U.S.S. COLE on

October 12, 2000.

Whereas on October 12, 2000, 17 United States Navy sailors

aboard the guided missile destroyer U.S.S. COLE

(DDG–67) were killed by terrorists while their ship was

being refueled in the Aden harbor in Yemen;

Whereas United States and Yemeni security forces and intelligence and law enforcement officials have been working

together since the attack to investigate and apprehend

those responsible;

Whereas numerous United States officials have joined President Clinton in condemning this attack and have committed their total support to bringing all of those involved

to justice;
2

•HCON 441 IH

Whereas both the House of Representatives and the Senate

have voted unanimously to condemn the attack; and

Whereas recent news accounts and official statements have

brought into serious question the level of cooperation

being afforded to United States investigators by the Yemeni Government: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the Government of Yemen should give

4 United States investigators complete and unfettered

5 access to fully investigate and question any and all

6 suspects in the October 12, 2000, terrorist attack on

7 the guided missile destroyer U.S.S. COLE (DDG–

8 67) while that ship was being refueled in the Aden

9 harbor in Yemen, including access to any Yemeni

10 Government officials suspected of having played a

11 role in that attack; and

12 (2) the President and senior administration of13 ficials leading the United States investigation of that

14 attack should use whatever means are necessary to

15 guarantee that investigators of the Federal Bureau

16 of Investigation have access to the information and

17 people they need to bring to justice everyone in18 volved in the attack on the U.S.S. COLE.

Æ
Exhibit
23.1




GRAPHIC
              KPMG
      LLP
              Telephone
              (416)
      777-8500Chartered
      Accountants
              Fax
              (416)
      777-8818Suite
      3300 Commerce Court West
              Internet
              www.kpmg.caPO
      Box 31 Stn Commerce CourtToronto
      ON M5L 1B2Canada
 
   CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   To
the Board of Directors of Jaguar Mining Inc.
  We
consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of:
  - our Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 23, 2009 on the
consolidated balance sheets of Jaguar Mining Inc. ("the Company") as at December
31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss, cash flows and shareholders  equity  for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008
  - our auditors'
report on reconciliation to United States GAAP dated March 23, 2009
  - our Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 23, 2009 on the
Company s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008
   each
of which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
     KPMG LOGO
  Chartered
Accountants Licensed Public Accountants
  Toronto,
Canada
 March
23, 2009
   KPMG
LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian
 member
firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
<PAGE>

                          WAXTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                           ---------------------------
                                403 Briarpark Dr.
                              Houston, Texas 77042
                          713 339 1122 Fax 713 339 1133


March 26, 2003

Mr. Tomohito Hanada
Mitsubishi International Corporation
1 Houston Center, Suite 3500
Houston, TX 77010

Dear Tomohito:

In accordance with Article 15 of our "Distribution Agreement" between Waxtech
and MIC, WaxTech has assigned the Agreement directly to EnerTeck. Acceptance on
the part of EnerTeck is acknowledged by EnerTeck's duly appointed representative
and indicates EnerTeck's agreement to assume the terms and conditions therein to
MIC, the distributor.


Regards,

/s/
V. Patrick Keating
President and CEO
WaxTech International, Inc.


Agreed and accepted for EnerTeck Chemical Corporation:

/s/

Dwaine D. Reese                             date: 3/26/03
Chairman and COO
From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org> 

 

 

 To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 09/12/2011 04:13 PM 

 Subject: Corrections and Supplemental Comments of Vinyl Institute on PVC MACT 

Proposed Rule 

 

Dear Ms. Howard,

During our post comment review, the VI uncovered some database anomalies

that should be called to your attention as they need to be corrected.

Some analyte names at one PVC producer were incorrectly identified in

VI’s 30 day concentration database. The error has been corrected in the

attached version of the database and the resultant recalculations

explained in the attached supplemental comments. Further corrections

to information in our comments originally submitted on August 2, 2011

are explained and a copy of the corrected comments is also attached.

Finally, the VI is offering clarification of the proposed

subcategorization definitions and the trigger date for new sources.

A disk is being sent by Keller and Heckman via FedEx Overnight to your

attention that contains these files, and the disk will have 4 additional

large Excel files that detail the calculations for TOHAP for both

existing and new sources using the corrected 30 day concentration

database.

Should any questions arise after reviewing this information, please do

not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.

Richard Krock

Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute

1737 King Street Suite 390

Alexandria, VA 22314

Direct: 571.970.3392

Mobile: 571.216.4474

Fax: 571.970.3271

Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylindesign.com(See attached file: VI PVC Industry Resin 30

day Conc Data Agg for EPA 8-26-11rev5.xls)(See attached file: VI PVC

MACT Supplemental Comments 09-12-11.pdf)(See attached file: Corrected VI

PVC MACT Working Group Comments 09-12-11.pdf)
W e s t C o a s t A e r i a l s L L C

A d d i t i o n a l r e q u e s t e d i n f o r m a t i o n f o r d o c k e t # F A A

- 2 0 1 4

- 0 9 3 7

D e s c r i p t i o n o f A i r c r a f t

.

A i r c r a f t # 1 : M a n u f a c t u r e r : F o x t e c h
M o d e l : K r a k e n K 1 3 0
T y p e : O c t o c o p t e r F l i g h t C o n t r o l l e r : D J I A 2
R a d i o C o n t r o l S y s t e m T r a n s m i t t e r : F u t a b a T 1 4 S G 2

. 4 G h z V i d e o T r a n s m i s s i o n : 5

. 8 g h z M a x i m u m T a k e o f f W e i g h t : 2 0 K g

A i r c r a f t # 2 : M a n u f a c t u r e r : D J I
M o d e l : S 1 0 0 0
T y p e : O c t o c o p t e r F l i g h t C o n t r o l l e r : D J I A 2
R a d i o C o n t r o l S y s t e m T r a n s m i t t e r : F u t a b a T 1 4 S G 2

. 4 G h z V i d e o T r a n s m i s s i o n : 5

. 8 g h z M a x i m u m T a k e o f f W e i g h t : 1 1 K g

A i r c r a f t # 3 : M a n u f a c t u r e r : D J I
M o d e l : S 9 0 0
T y p e : H e x a c o p t e r F l i g h t C o n t r o l l e r : D J I A 2
R a d i o C o n t r o l S y s t e m T r a n s m i t t e r : F u t a b a T 1 4 S G 2

. 4 G h z V i d e o T r a n s m i s s i o n : 5

. 8 g h z M a x i m u m T a k e o f f W e i g h t : 8

. 2 K g

A i r c r a f t # 4 : M a n u f a c t u r e r : D J I
M o d e l : F l a m e w h e e l F 5 5 0
T y p e : H e x a c o p t e r F l i g h t C o n t r o l l e r : D J I A 2
R a d i o C o n t r o l S y s t e m T r a n s m i t t e r : F u t a b a T 1 4 S G 2

. 4 G h z V i d e o T r a n s m i s s i o n : 5

. 8 g h z M a x i m u m T a k e o f f W e i g h t : 2

. 4 K g

A i r c r a f t # 5 : M a n u f a c t u r e r : D J I
M o d e l : P h a n t o m 2
T y p e : Q u a d c o p t e r F l i g h t C o n t r o l l e r : N A Z A
R a d i o C o n t r o l S y s t e m T r a n s m i t t e r : F u t a b a T 1 4 S G 2

. 4 G h z V i d e o T r a n s m i s s i o n : 5

. 8 g h z M a x i m u m T a k e o f f W e i g h t : 1

. 3 K g
| -   | Sophlex Ship Management, Inc. |
|---------------|-------------------------------|

| -   | Commercial Management, Inc. |
|---------------|-----------------------------|

| -   | Marine Growth Finance & Charter, Inc. |
|---------------|-------------------------------------------|

| -   | Marine Growth Aggregates, Inc. |
|---------------|--------------------------------|

| -   | Marine Growth Freight, Inc. |
|---------------|-----------------------------|

| -   | Ship Timeshare Management, Inc. |
|---------------|---------------------------------|

| -   | Marine Growth Canada, Ltd. |
|---------------|----------------------------|
March 2, 1955

No. 58806.

protests 557109-G, etc.

#### Brin Bros. & Senegram *v.*United States,

Abstract 58204. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
H. Con. Res. 336 Agreed to May 25, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Thursday, May 25, 2000, or Friday, May 26, 2000, on a motion

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

or his designee, it stand adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday,

June 6, 2000, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second

day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that

when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business

on Thursday, May 25, 2000, Friday, May 26, 2000, Saturday, May

27, 2000, or Sunday, May 28, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant

to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee,

it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, June 5,

2000, or Tuesday, June 6, 2000, as may be specified by its Majority

Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or

at such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority

Leader or his designee in the motion, or until noon on the second

day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 336—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 115 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 115

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2000

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by strik-
ing the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting
``October 26, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

August 19, 1958

No. 62316.

#### International Packers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 289802-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Con. Res. 89 Agreed to October 5, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas there are currently more than 57,900,000 individuals of

German heritage residing in the United States, who comprise

nearly 25 percent of the population of the United States and

are therefore the largest ethnic group in the United States;

Whereas those of German heritage are not merely descendants

of one political entity, but of all German speaking areas;

Whereas numerous Americans of German heritage have made

countless contributions to American culture, arts, and industry,

the American military, and American government;

Whereas there is no recognized tangible, national symbol dedicated

to German Americans and their positive contributions to the

United States;

Whereas the story of Hermann the Cheruscan parallels that of

the American Founding Fathers, because he was a freedom fighter

who united ancient German tribes in order to shed the yoke

of Roman tyranny and preserve freedom for the territory of

present-day Germany;

Whereas the Hermann Monument located in Hermann Heights

Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, was dedicated in 1897 in honor

of the spirit of freedom and later dedicated to all German

immigrants who settled in New Ulm and elsewhere in the United

States; and

Whereas the Hermann Monument has been recognized as a site

of special historical significance by the United States Government,

by placement on the National Register of Historic Places: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Hermann Monument and Hermann Heights Park

in New Ulm, Minnesota, are recognized by the Congress to be
H. Con. Res. 89—2

a national symbol for the contributions of Americans of German

heritage.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Case 2:06-cv-00954-JLR Document 24 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 1