alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State/Tribe

EPA 

Region Data Format Time Stamp

How Federally Regulated Was 

Determined Database URL

Region 1 Tribes 1 Access End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet Provided by OUST on CD

Region 4 Tribes 4 Access End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet Provided by OUST on CD

Region 5 Tribes 5 Excel End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Filtering process Provided by OUST on CD

Region 6 Tribes 6 Access End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet Provided by OUST on CD

Region 7 Tribes 7 Access End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet Provided by OUST on CD

Region 8 Tribes 8 Access End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet Provided by OUST on CD

Region 9 Tribes 9 Access End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet Provided by OUST on CD

Region 10 Tribes 10 Access End of FY08 (9/30/2008) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet Provided by OUST on CD

Alaska 10 Word Doc

Date of download

(6/29/2009) Fed Reg column in spreadsheet http://www.dec.state.ak.us/spar/ipp/ust/search/default.htm

Alabama 4 NA NA NA NA

Arkansas 6 Access

Date of download

(6/29/2009) All are regulated. http://www.adeq.state.ar.us/rst/tankstats/quick_stat.asp

Florida 4 Excel 7/7/2009 Filtering process http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/quick_topics/database_reports/pages/stcm/storagetank/stcm_allti.htm

Hawaii 9 Excel 6/23/2009 Filtering process http://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/waste/ust/data.html

Indiana 5 Excel 1/2009 Filtering process http://www.ai.org/idem/5081.htm

Maine 1 PDF 7/2009 Fed Reg column in spreadsheet http://www.maine.gov/dep/rwm/ust/formslists.htm 

Michigan 5 Excel

Does not specify

Last date in database is 5/20/2009 Filtering process http://www.deq.state.mi.us/sid-web/Download_Search.aspx

Missouri 7 Access 6/24/2009 Filtering process http://www.dnr.mo.gov/env/hwp/downloads/hwpet.htm

Mississippi 4 Dreamweaver

Does not specify

Last date in database is 6/3/2009 Filtering process http://muster.deq.state.ms.us/webreportapplication/USTSearchWF.aspx

Nevada 9 Excel 4/3/2009 Fed Reg column in spreadsheet http://ndep.nv.gov/BCA/data.htm 

Ohio 5 Excel

Does not specify

Last date in database in 6/3/2009 Filtering process https://www.com.state.oh.us/sfm/bustr/downloads.asp 

Pennsylvania 3 Excel 6/2009 Filtering process http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/landrecwaste/cwp/view.asp?a=1240&Q=453764&landrecwasteNav=|30725| 

South Dakota 8 Excel 4/7/2009 Filtering process http://denr.sd.gov/des/gw/tanks/Searchable_tank_database.aspx

Tennessee 4 Access 3/2005 NA http://www.state.tn.us/environment/ust/ustlist.shtml 

Washington 10 Excel

Does not specify

Last date in database is 5/5/2009 All are regulated. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/tcpwebreporting/reports.aspx 

TDD 18 Appendix: Data Sources and Time Stamps for State and Tribal UST Information

TO 3003 TDD 5, Online State UST Equipment Availability 1
---

Exhibit 99.9


CONSENT OF MICHAEL F. SHAW Reference is made to the technical report entitled Technical Report Updatedated March 2, 2010, which the undersigned has prepared for Baja Mining Corp. (the Technical Report). I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) of Baja Mining Corp. Dated this 31st day of March, 2011. /s/Michael ShawName: Michael F. Shaw


---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                               SHOPKO STORES, INC.


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ShopKo Stores,
Inc. (the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 30, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: September 8, 2005
                                        SHOPKO STORES, INC.



                                                /s/ Michael J. Hopkins
                                        ------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Hopkins
                                                President, Pamida Division
                                                Co-Chief Executive Officer*


         This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


* The office of Chief Executive Officer is comprised of three executive
officers, each serving as Co-Chief Executive Officer.


                                       33
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 12, 2015

No. 04-15-00005-CV

IN RE ESTATE OF JACK HIROMI IKENAGA, Sr., Deceased,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PC-4330

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was due to be filed with this court on February 3, 2015. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 35.1. On February 4, 2015, this court granted court reporter Cheryl Hester’s request 

for an extension of time to file the record until March 6, 2015, for an extension of thirty-one

days.

On the due date, court reporter Cheryl Hester filed a second request for an extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record until March 13, 2015. The request is GRANTED. The 

reporter’s record must be filed with this court by March 13, 2015. See id. R. 35.3(c). 

If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by March 13, 2015, any requests for additional 

time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. The report must 

describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. 

The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, proofread, 

and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). The report may describe 

any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter 

reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the requested date. A 

preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached to this order. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of March, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2011311EN.01004103.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Omnicare v OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE)

(Case T-290/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark OMNICARE - Earlier national figurative mark OMNICARE - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the services - Genuine use of the earlier mark)

2011/C 311/75

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Omnicare, Inc. (Covington, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Astellas Pharma GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Gutiérrez Martínez, H. Granado Carpenter and M. Polo Carreño, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2009 (Case R 402/2008-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Yamanouchi Pharma GmbH and Omnicare, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Omnicare, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Omnicare, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
Case No. 10,339.

#### NORTHWESTERN MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. PERRILL et al.

[I Civ. Law Bul. 196.]

Circuit Court, S. D. Ohio.

1879.

Interest — Pa table Semi Annually — Interest on Unpaid Installments

The complainant filed its bill in equity against Zebulon H. I’errill and others, to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of the amount stipulated in the fulfillment of the terms and conditions contained in a certain bond; The said bond, among other things, contained the following provisions, viz.: “That if said bounden, Zebulon H. PerriH, his heirs, executors, administrators, or any of them, shall well and triily pay, or cause to be paid, unto the above mentioned, the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, or to its certain attorneys, successors or assigns, the full and just sum of eight thousand dollars at the expiration of five years from date of these presents, with interest thereon until paid at the rale of eight per centum per annum, payable semiannually on the first day of January and of July in each and every year,” etc. It was conceded that the terms of the mortgage had been broken, and that the complainant was entitled to a decree of foreclosure for the amount stipulated for in the bond, with interest from January 1. 1S77, the manner of computing the interest being submitted to the court.

Sayler & Sayler, for complainant.

B. H. Bostwick, for respondents.

SWING, District Judge.

By the terms of the bond, the principal is to be paid at the expiration of five years, with interest thereon until paid at the rate of eight per centum. Following the case of Monnett v. Sturges, 25 Ohio St. 384, we hold that the contract is to pay interest at the rate of eight per cent, until the principal debt is paid, and not merely for the time the bond is to run. It is stipulated that this interest is payable semiannually. Where semi-annual installments of interest have become due, and are not paid, each such installment of interest will bear interest from the time it is due, at the rate of six per cent. Dunlap v. Wiseman, 2 Disn. 398; Monnett v. Sturges, 20 Ohio St. 381: Cramer v. Lepper, 26 Ohio St. 59. The complainant will therefore be entitled to interest on the principal debt at the rate of eight per centum from January 1st, 1877. until the time of taking the decree, and interest at six per cent, per annum upon each semi-annual installment of interest from the time when they respectively fell due. Decree accordingly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

JASON MICHAEL TABOR :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2542 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1

- 18

- 810

(Supreme Court of New Jersey, D

- 150 September Term 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 88859

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11 th day of January, 2019, having failed to respond to a Notice

and Order directing him to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal

discipline, Jason Michael Tabor is disbarred from the practice of law in the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E.

217.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,190
<INVENTORY>                                     34,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,110
<PP&E>                                          18,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,143
<BONDS>                                            889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,721
<SALES>                                        135,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,389
<CGS>                                           89,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 12.01

                                 CSK AUTO, INC.

        Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               --------------------------------------
                                                               January 28,   February 2,  February 1,
                                                                  1996          1997        1998
                                                               --------------------------------------
                                                                           (in thousands)
<S>                                                            <C>            <C>           <C>
Income (loss) before taxes and extraordinary items              $(14,541)     $(34,852)     $10,202
                                                               ======================================
Fixed Charges

Interest expense                                                  14,379        19,025       34,279
Interest portion of rentals                                       18,329        17,071       19,281
                                                               --------------------------------------
    Total fixed charges                                           32,708        36,096       53,560

Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges                    18,167         1,244       63,762
                                                               ======================================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)                                 --            --         1.19
                                                               ======================================
</TABLE>


(1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has not been computed for fiscal 1996
and 1995 since earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges. The coverage
deficiencies were $34,852 and $14,541, respectively.
Before the Second Division,

August 27, 1957

No. 61171.

#### Charles Garcia & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 293139-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 7,741a.

#### KETELTAS et al. v. RAFT OF TIMBER.

[Betts, Scr. Bk. 139.]

District Court S. D. New York.

1848.

Salvage — Right to Salvage Compensation.

[Towing a raft of timber to a place of safety, and securing it there, so preventing its drifting out to sea, is salvage service.]

[This was a libel for salvage by John S. Keteltas and four others against a raft of timber.]

BETTS, District Judge.

Suit for salvage, in recovering the raft worth $600 or $800 drifting out to sea, below the Narrows. Half or one-third the value of the timber was claimed as salvage compensation. Held, on the pleadings and proofs, that this was a case of salvage service, but of a very low order. Held, that the claimants did not proffer a reasonable reward to the libelants, if • they can be fairly regarded as having made any serious offer of compensation. The services rendered by the libelants were prompt and beneficial to the claimants, as without their interference there is reasonable ground to infer the raft would have floated out to sea and been lost; or, at least, the claimants would have been exposed to trouble and heavy expense in recovering it. But the services were but very slight in themselves, consisting of towing the raft half a mile, mostly by one person with a small boat, aided part of the way by two other small boats. The chief labor was in securing the logs on the beach and watching them there. Fifty dollars salvage and costs awarded.
Exhibit 99.4  Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders as of December 31, 2005
STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATIONMORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATESSERIES 2005-S4
Original
Beginning
Principal
Interest
Ending
Class
Balance
Balance
Distributed
Distributed
Loss
Balance
A
172,293,000.00
172,293,000.00
20,081,859.50
2,457,831.36
0.00
152,211,140.50
B
10,980,000.00
10,980,000.00
0.00
237,900.00
0.00
10,980,000.00
P
100.00
100.00
0.00
269,072.16
0.00
100.00
X
4,410,756.91
4,410,756.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,410,756.91
R
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

  CERTIFICATION OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 2005, PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:

-     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2005
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and

-     the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a part
of the Form 10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated: June 9, 2005

                                                   /s/ KENNETH C. BUDDE
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Kenneth C. Budde
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                                   /s/ THOMAS M. KITCHEN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Thomas M. Kitchen
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

                                       82
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

p0901 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138765 

CHRIS GOODRICH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138765 

 COA: 281652 

Genesee CC: 06-083994-CL 

HOME DEPOT, HOME DEPOT, INC., and/or 

HOME DEPOT USA, INC., RICHARD 

TINDALL, MIKE KINZELL, a/k/a MIKE 

KINSAL, JULIA PETERS, and LINDSEY 

MAGLEY, a/k/a LINDSAY MAGLEY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 234 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.234
                                     Agreed to December 21, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the enrolled copy of the bill (H.R. 2466) making appropriations 
for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes, shall not be 
presented to the President, to the end that the bill be, and is hereby, 
laid on the table.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
infraction, he failed to demonstrate that a deduction of 180 credits was

improper. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Hardesty
Douglas 

## tak J. 

# 0-\szt. J. Cherry
cc: Hon. Gary Fairman, District Judge Bruce Birch Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 0t199) ,
No. 68584.

protests 320819-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Globe Importing Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 65323.

#### Asbury Graphite Mills, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/19732 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of amorphous graphite the same in all material respects as that the subject of *The Asbury Graphite Mills, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 141, C.D. 2077), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.