alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 7

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax

deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home

should not be further restricted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mrs. ROUKEMA submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home should not be further

restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal,

which promotes social and economic benefits beyond the

benefits that accrue to the occupant of the home;

Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting

economic security and stability for American families;

Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should continue to be to encourage homeownership;
2

•HCON 7 IH

Whereas the increase in the cost of housing over the last 10

years has been greater than the increase in family income;

Whereas, for the first time in 50 years, the percentage of

people in the United States owning their own homes has

declined;

Whereas the percentage of people in the United States between the ages of 25 and 29 who own their own home

has declined from 43 percent in 1976 to 38 percent

today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation’s housing policy for most

of this century and may well be the most important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by second homes is of crucial

importance to the economies of many communities;

Whereas the continued deductibility of interest paid on debt

secured by a first or second home has particular importance in promoting other desirable social goals, such as

education of young people; and

Whereas the Federal income tax deduction for interest paid

on debt secured by a first or second home has been limited twice in the last 6 years, and was further eroded as

a result of the 1990 Budget Act: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on
3

•HCON 7 IH

1 debt secured by a first or second home should not be fur2 ther restricted.

Æ
FEMA Fact Sheet

January 2021 1

Natural Floodplain Function Activities and 

Species Conservation through the CRS

Purpose

As part of its efforts to implement Section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA), together with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service 

(known as “the Services”), conducted a pilot study to determine how to increase community participation in the 

National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS)1 activities that protect threatened and 

endangered species. Implemented in 1990, the CRS is a voluntary program for recognizing and encouraging 

floodplain management activities exceeding the minimum NFIP standards. Over 3.6 million policyholders (70% of 

flood insurance policies) are written for the 1,500+ CRS participating communitties. As a community implements 

local mitigation, floodplain management, and outreach, their residents become eligible for discounted insurance 

premium rates.

Existing CRS activities focus on preserving open space, water quality improvement, or habitat improvement. These 

activities address species protection from a holistic perspective (i.e., activities undertaken with beneficial results for 

all species or habitats). To promote existing CRS incentives and recommend new ones, FEMA and the Services 

worked to:

 Identify current CRS activities that communities might engage in to conserve threatened and endangered 

species and their habitats and mitigate flood risk, 

 Identify barriers and opportunities to those CRS activities,

 Develop guidance that would help communities conserve species and their habitats, 

 Provide technical assistance to help communities carry out these CRS conservation activities, and

 Identify ways the CRS can be modified to better motivate communities to undertake activities to protect 

threatened and endangered species and their habitats and/or help their recovery.

1 CRS Website: https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-rating-system
Incentivizing Natural Floodplain Function Activities and Threatened and Endangered Species Conservation through the 

Community Rating System

Learn more at fema.gov January 2021 2

Figure 1. Promote Existing Incentives and Create New Incentives

Recommendations Accepted by the CRS Task Force

Based on the pilot study, FEMA and the Services provided recommendations to the CRS Task Force for the interim 

2021 Addendum to the 2017 CRS Coordinator’s Manual. Two new CRS credits will be introduced, a Floodplain 

Species Assessment (FSA) and Floodplain Species Plan (FSP), designed to encourage local officials to assess the 

threatened and endangered species that have range in their communities, research conservation and recovery 

activities for those species where community actions will have the greatest impact, and adopt a plan to implement 

those actions. In addition, CRS guidance and overview webinars for the new FSA and FSP CRS credits will be 

provided in early 2021.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2022078DE.01004501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.3.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 78/45 |

---

Berichtigung der der Verordnung (EU) 2022/334 des Rates vom 28. Februar 2022 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 883/2014 des Rates über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 57 vom 28. Februar 2022](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2022_057_R_TOC)
)

Seite „Inhalt“ und Seite 1, Titel:

Anstatt:

„Verordnung (EU) 2022/334 des Rates vom 28. Februar 2022 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 883/2014 des Rates über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren“

muss es heißen:

„Verordnung (EU) 2022/334 des Rates vom 28. Februar 2022 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 833/2014 des Rates über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren“.

Seite 1, Erwägungsgründe 1 und 2:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(1) | Der Rat hat am 31. Juli 2014 die Verordnung (EU) Nr. 883/2014 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren, angenommen. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Mit der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 883/2014 werden bestimmte im Beschluss 2014/512/GASP des Rates vorgesehene Maßnahmen umgesetzt.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(1) | Der Rat hat am 31. Juli 2014 die Verordnung (EU) Nr. 833/2014 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren, angenommen. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| (2) | Mit der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 833/2014 werden bestimmte im Beschluss 2014/512/GASP des Rates vorgesehene Maßnahmen umgesetzt.“ |

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

          - [Docket No. FRA-2000-7257, Notice No. 95]

# AGENCY:

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Announcement of charter renewal of the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC).

# SUMMARY:

FRA announces the charter renewal of the RSAC, a Federal Advisory Committee established by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act to provide information, advice, and recommendations to the FRA Administrator on matters relating to railroad safety. This charter renewal will be effective for two years from the date it is filed with Congress.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenton Kilgore, RSAC Designated Federal Officer/RSAC Coordinator, FRA Office of Railroad Safety, 202-365-3724.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This notice is provided in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. app. 2). RSAC comprises 51 representatives from 26 organizations, representing various rail industry perspectives. The diversity of the committee ensures the requisite range of views and expertise necessary to discharge its responsibilities. Please see the RSAC website for additional information at                     *https://rsac.fra.dot.gov/​.*

Issued in Washington, DC.

Amitabha Bose,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2023-23574 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
# Maryland

                  -                      -                        -                          -                            -  Regions, States & Territories 
                          - Region 3
                          -  Region 3 
                          -  Maryland 
                          -  Delaware 
                          -  District of Columbia 
                          -  Pennsylvania 
                          -  Virginia 
                          -  West Virginia 
                          -  Region 1 
                          -  Region 2 
                          -  Region 4 
                          -  Region 5 
                          -  Region 6 
                          -  Region 7 
                          -  Region 8 
                          -  Region 9 
                          -  Region 10 
                          -  Tribes 
                  -  Regions, States and Territories 
                  -  Tribes 
                  -  Region 1 
                  -  Region 2 
                  -  Region 3 
                  -  Delaware 
                  -  District of Columbia (DC) 
                  -  Maryland 
                  -  News, Media & Events 
                  -  Risk Reduction 
                  -  Contact & About 
                  -  Pennsylvania 
                  -  Virginia 
                  -  West Virginia 
                  -  Region 4 
                  -  Region 5 
                  -  Region 6 
                  -  Region 7 
                  -  Region 8 
                  -  Region 9 
                  -  Region 10 

                            - English
                            - Español

On This Page

Declared DisastersActive - Apply for Assistance

Emergency Response Resources

Disaster Recovery Centers

More About This Location

News, Media & EventsEvents | Preparedness Tips | Press Releases & Fact Sheets | PDFs & Multimedia

Risk ReductionFind Your Flood Map | Minimize Local Risk | Environmental Requirements

Contact & AboutContacts | Federal Funding Data | Employment Opportunities

## Declared Disasters

Maryland Tropical Storm Isaias (4583-DR-MD)

Incident Period: August 3, 2020 - August 4, 2020

Major Disaster Declaration declared on February 4, 2021

Maryland Covid-19 Pandemic (DR-4491-MD)

Incident Period: January 20, 2020 - May 11, 2023

Major Disaster Declaration declared on March 26, 2020
Active - Apply for Assistance

Maryland Covid-19  (EM-3430-MD)

Incident Period: January 20, 2020 - May 11, 2023

Emergency Declaration declared on March 13, 2020

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast » 

## Emergency Response Resources

Inciweb – Incident Information System

Maryland Emergency Management Agency

Maryland Office of the Governor

Maryland State and Local Level Referrals

## Disaster Recovery Centers

There are no active Disaster Recovery Centers for this location at this time.

Return to top
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Ernst & Young LLP**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 

1. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130229) pertaining to the ClearChannel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan 

2. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-132950) pertaining to the Clear ChannelCommunications, Inc. 2005 401(k) Savings Plan 

of our reports dated March 2, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleof Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Antonio, Texas

March 2, 2009
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MAURICIO SALAZARCARRANZA, AKA Joe Salazar, Jr.,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71274

Agency No. A023-075-675

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2010 ** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Mauricio Salazar-Carranza, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying,

as untimely filed, his motion to reopen removal proceedings.

FILED

MAR 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71274

Salazar-Carranza alleges that the untimeliness of his motion to reopen was

excused by equitable tolling, and that he was improperly placed in removal

proceedings. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Salazar-Carranza’s motion

to reopen as untimely filed, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioner failed to

establish that he acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003) (deadline for filing a motion

to reopen can be equitably tolled “when a petitioner is prevented from filing

because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due

diligence”). In any event, we lack jurisdiction to review Salazar-Carranza’s

equitable tolling claim because he did not raise this claim before the BIA. See

Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004). To the extent that

petitioner challenges the BIA’s refusal to reopen sua sponte, we lack jurisdiction to

review that decision. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 21153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1796 Prepped by Keeia Richards
Document

Number: 

# 53 ) VI-B- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/20084:20:37

PM Sheet 53 of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B- 4 Thi s documen t

ha s bee nmove dt o IV-E-2 4 a t th e reques t

o f th e projec t

officer . I

t wa s incorrectl y categorize doriginally .
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- Vigil Contracting, Inc. Under Contract No. W912L5-11-C-0002 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58391

Charles M. Asmar, Esq. David A. Edelstein, Esq.

Asmar, Schor & McKenna PLLC Washington, DC Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Ildiko Szentkiralyi, JA Brian E. Bentley, Esq. CPT Anthony F. Schiavetti, JA

Trial Attorneys ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties having advised the Board that they have settled this appeal, and having furnished the Board with a copy oftheir settlement agreement, this appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to reinstatement only in the event that the agreed settlement is not consummated. Dated: 5 September 2014
ALEXANDER YO Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 58391, Appeal ofVigil Contracting, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals 

# I t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1470 

KA 11-00927 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ENNIS E. RUFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

ROBERT M. PUSATERI, CONFLICT DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (EDWARD P. PERLMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

ENNIS E. RUFFIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S.

Sperrazza, J.), rendered October 7, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled

substance in or near school grounds. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near

school grounds (Penal Law § 220.44 [2]), defendant contends in his

main brief that his plea allocution was not factually sufficient. 

Defendant, on appeal, does not challenge the validity of his waiver of

the right to appeal, however, and thus his contention is encompassed

by that waiver (see People v Lewandowski, 82 AD3d 1602, 1602). We

further conclude that “the challenge by defendant [in his main brief]

to the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury is forfeited

by his guilty plea” (People v Dickerson, 66 AD3d 1371, 1372, lv denied

13 NY3d 859; see People v Dunbar, 53 NY2d 868, 871). 

In addition, by pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his

contention in his pro se supplemental brief with respect to

preindictment prosecutorial misconduct (see People v Di Raffaele, 55

NY2d 234, 240; People v Oliveri, 49 AD3d 1208, 1209). Finally,

defendant contends in his pro se supplemental brief that he was denied

effective assistance of counsel. That contention does not survive his

guilty plea or his waiver of the right to appeal because “[t]here is

no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by [the]

allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea

because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance” (People v
-2- 1470 

KA 11-00927 

Robinson, 39 AD3d 1266, 1267, lv denied 9 NY3d 869 [internal quotation

marks omitted]).

Entered: December 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 52807.

#### Eugene Gray et al. *v.*United States,

protests 121852-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
No. 67675.

#### Capitol Distributors Corp. (Trans.) et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/12105, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 CCPA 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

December 13, 1962

No. 67267.

protest 60/31333 (San Francisco).

#### Joseph A. Paredes & Co. and Thomas E. Cara, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of coffee machines the same in all material respects as those the .subject of Abstract 64580, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                    CONSENT OF THE COIN LAUNDRY ASSOCIATION
 
   
     The Coin Laundry Association hereby consents to all references made to it
and to all facts and figures in the 1997 survey conducted on behalf of and
published by the Coin Laundry Association in Amendment No. 5 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of SpinCycle, Inc. (Registration No. 333-57989), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 1998.
    
 
                                          Coin Laundry Association
 
                                          By /s/ GEORGE PISTONA
 
                                            ------------------------------------
                                          Name George Pistona
                                          Title   Deputy Executive Director
 
Coin Laundry Association
Downers Grove, Illinois
   
November 23, 1998
(function ($,once) {
  'use strict';

  const applyTableSaw = (context) => {
    if (window.Tablesaw) {
      once("femaTableSaw", "table:not(.datatable)", context).forEach(function(element){
        $(element).addClass("tablesaw tablesaw-stack").attr("data-tablesaw-mode","stack");
      });
      window.Tablesaw.init();
    }
  }

  Drupal.behaviors.femaTableSaw = {
    attach: function (context) {
      applyTableSaw(context);
    }
  };
})(jQuery, once);
Before the Second Division,

May 26, 1964

No. 68583.

protest 60/13518 (Boston).

#### Williams & Rosenbaum, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. *Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-02132-JLR Document 12 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 1