alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ Gui Hua LanGui Hua LanChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
April 28, 2008/s/ Qiong Hua GaoQiong Hua GaoChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
April 28, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF JUMPIN' JAX CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                        13,000
<SECURITIES>                  50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                 188,000
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   221,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              572,000
<PP&E>                        3,542,000
<DEPRECIATION>                (553,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,927,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         8,354,000
<BONDS>                       859,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      15,000
<OTHER-SE>                    (5,301,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,927,000
<SALES>                       3,480,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3,480,000
<CGS>                         3,355,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,355,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,307,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            167,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,349,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,349,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,349,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.10)
        


</TABLE>
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 364

Calling for the immediate release of Mr. Edmond Pope from prison in Russia

for humanitarian reasons, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 2000

Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in

addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Banking and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for the immediate release of Mr. Edmond Pope from

prison in Russia for humanitarian reasons, and for other

purposes.

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope is a husband, father, grandfather, and businessman;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope traveled to Russia on a visa

which explicitly stated that his business purpose was to

purchase underwater propulsion technology;

Whereas this technology was advertised as available by commercial sale;

Whereas there are instances where this or similar technology

has been sold on the open market;
2

•HCON 364 IH

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope was arrested on April 3, 2000,

in Moscow, Russia, and was subsequently imprisoned in

Lefortovo;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope has been falsely charged with espionage but no specific charges of wrongdoing have been

presented over these past 12 weeks;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope has been treated for bone cancer

that is currently in remission, but requires constant medical monitoring;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope has been diagnosed with Graves

disease;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope has been advised that he may

also have melanoma;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope’s prison conditions have caused

a dramatic loss in weight and produced a rash associated

with his untreated Graves disease;

Whereas these conditions could lead to a recurrence of his

bone cancer;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope’s father is dying of the very same

cancer and deserves the opportunity to see his son;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope’s 30th wedding anniversary occurred while imprisoned;

Whereas Mr. Edmond Pope has been unjustly arrested and

detained for nearly 3 months; and

Whereas United States business ventures within Russia will

be detrimentally impacted by this event unless it is resolved quickly: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—
3

•HCON 364 IH

1 (1) the Congress calls for the immediate release

2 of Mr. Edmond Pope on humanitarian reasons;

3 (2) no funds should be provided for the pur4 poses of assisting the Russian Federation to prepare

5 for or adjoin or accede to the World Trade Organi6 zation (WTO);

7 (3) no funds should be provided for programs

8 under the authority of the Overseas Private Invest9 ment Corporation for activities within the Russian

10 Federation; and

11 (4) the President should use the voice and vote

12 of the United States to oppose further loans to the

13 Government of the Russian Federation by any inter14 national funding institution of which the United

15 States is a member.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAIME VILLA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 047

- C R

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 1 0D0 5357 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until September 9 , 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE STATE’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza

, the State ’s attorney, prepare the

State ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 9

, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 3 th day of August , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.
Exhibit 10.69
  AGREEMENT FOR INTERRUPTIBLE TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS
  Kenai Nikiski Pipeline
  Interruptible Transportation Agreement No. _________________
   This TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT FOR INTERRUPTIBLE TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS (“Interruptible Transportation Agreement” or “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of September 16, 2010 and shall be effective as of October 1, 2010 (“Effective Date”) between:
   Marathon Oil Company, dba Kenai Nikiski Pipeline (“Transporter”) and
  Chugach Electric Association, Inc., (“Shipper”).
  Witnesseth:  That in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties agree as follows:
  SECTION 1
SERVICE TO BE RENDERED
  Transporter shall perform and Shipper shall receive Interruptible Transportation Service from any Receipt Point and to any Delivery Point as available in accordance with the provisions of Transporter’s effective Rate Schedule IT-1 and/or Rate Schedule IT-2 and the applicable Rules and Regulations of Transporter’s Gas Tariff on file with the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (“Commission”) as the same may be amended or superseded in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Commission.  The provisions of Transporter’s Gas Tariff are incorporated by reference in this Agreement.
 
 SECTION 2
TERM
  This Agreement shall be for a primary term of One (1) Month, commencing on the Effective Date.
 
 After expiration of the primary term, this Agreement shall remain in effect on a month-to-month basis unless otherwise terminated by Transporter or Shipper (“Terminating Party”).  To terminate the Agreement, the Terminating Party must provide the other party at least thirty (30) days notice before the date of termination at the address provided in Section 4 of this Agreement.
 
 SECTION 3.
RATES
  Shipper shall pay the currently effective Rate Schedule IT-1 or IT-2 Rates, as applicable, set forth in Transporter’s Tariff as may be revised and superseded subject to Commission approval, from time to time.
 
 SECTION 4.
NOTICES
  Notices to Transporter under this Agreement shall be addressed to:
 Kenai Nikiski Pipeline
 43280 Kenai Spur Highway
 P.O. Box 2399
 Kenai, Alaska 99611
 Attention:  Area Manager
 Fax:  907-283-6198
  
  Notices to Shipper under this Agreement shall be addressed to:
 Chugach Electric Association, Inc.
 5601 Electron Drive
 P.O. Box 196300
 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6300
 Attention:  Manager, Fuel Supply
 Phone:  907-762-4577
 Fax:  907-762-4191
  SECTION 5.
SUPERSEDED AGREEMENTS [NONE]
   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed Interruptible Transportation Agreement in several counterparts by their duly authorized officers with effect as of the day first above written.
 
 Shipper: Chugach Electric Association, Inc.

Marathon Oil Company, dba Kenai Nikiski Pipeline/s/ Lee Thibert

/s/ Craig ChambersLee Thibert,

Craig Chambers,Sr. VP Strategic Planning and Corporate Affairs

Commercial Manager
A90A0172.

#### In re PARROTT.

(392 SE2d 48)

Sognier, Judge.

Lorenzo Parrott appeals from the denial of his petition to change his name. Although appellant contends his First Amendment rights were violated by the trial court’s holding, in effect challenging the constitutionality of OCGA §§ 19-12-1 and 19-12-4, the record does not reflect that this issue was raised below or that the trial court made any ruling regarding the issue. “Our appellate courts have no original jurisdiction and will decide no question on appeal not clearly presented to and passed upon by the trial court. [Cit.] Consequently no constitutional issue is involved, and this court has jurisdiction of the appeal.” *Security Mgmt. Co. v. King,*132 Ga. App. 618, 619 (1) (a) (208 SE2d 576) (1974).

“The action of the superior court in granting or refusing a proper application to change the name of a person is based solely on a sound legal discretion. . . .” *Binford v. Reid,*83 Ga. App. 280 (63 SE2d 345) (1951). Based on the fact that appellant’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, attached to his petition to change his name, reflected that appellant was in jail, the trial court stated in its order that it inquired into the reason for appellant’s incarceration and was informed appel*857lant was convicted of first degree forgery. The trial court concluded that “[s]ince a legal change in [appellant’s] name at this time might result in confusion, allow him to conceal his true identity and disassociate himself from his past criminal record, the petition to change name is hereby denied.” We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in so holding.

Decided March 13, 1990.

Lorenzo Parrott, *pro se.*

*Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.*
EXHIBIT
32.1




AMERICAN
TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E.
Durkin, III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





Date:
December 22, 2008




/s/
      Thomas E. Durkin, IIIPresident
No. 54470.

#### Park Benziger & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 89074-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 15, 2023 No. 04-22-00768-CV IN THE INTEREST OF L.S.R., J.A.L., AND P.L. , Children From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-02034 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal from a final order terminating appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. See T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. The appellees’ brief was due on February 6, 2023. However, the appellees have filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the appellees’ brief. The motion is GRANTED. The appellees’ brief is due on or before February 27, 2023
. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
It is so ORDERED on February 15, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             431                     431
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1245                    1245
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (27)                    (27)
<INVENTORY>                                        486                     486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2173                    2173
<PP&E>                                           12700                   12700
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3353)                  (3353)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12339                   12339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2610                    2610
<BONDS>                                           2526                    2526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         11321                   11321
<OTHER-SE>                                       (419)                   (419)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12339                   12339
<SALES>                                           2288                    6277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2288                    6277
<CGS>                                             1038                    2911
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2120                    6078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3                       9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151                     481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     17                   (282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17                   (282)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17                   (282)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                  (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1
 
                  [LETTERHEAD OF MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP]
 
                                 March 1, 1999
 
The FINOVA Group Inc.
1850 N. Central Avenue, No. 1159
P.O. Box 2209
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
 
Re: The FINOVA Group Inc.: Registration Statement on Form S-4
 
Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
     We have acted as counsel to The FINOVA Group Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with the preparation of a Registration Statement
on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement") filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"),
relating to the registration of up to 6,083,251 shares of Common Stock, par
value $.01 per share (the "Shares"), of the Company to be issued in connection
with the transactions contemplated by that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of January 6, 1999, among the Company, FINOVA Newco Inc. and Sirrom
Capital Corporation, attached as Annex A to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus
included in the Registration Statement (the "Merger Agreement"). In rendering
the opinion set forth below, we have reviewed (a) the Registration Statement;
(b) the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws; (c) certain records
of the Company's corporate proceedings as reflected in its minute books; (d) the
Merger Agreement; and (e) such records, documents, statutes and decisions as we
have deemed relevant. In our examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all
signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and
the conformity with the original of all documents submitted to us as copies
thereof.
 
     Our opinions set forth below is limited to the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware (the "DGCL").
 
     Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Shares will, when
issued in the manner and on the terms described in the Registration Statement
and the Merger Agreement, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid
and non-assessable.
 
     We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as Exhibit 5 to the
Registration Statement and further consent to the reference to us under the
caption "Legal Matters" in the proxy statement included in the Registration
Statement. In giving such opinion, we do not thereby admit that we are acting
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Act or the rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
thereunder.
 
     The opinion expressed herein is solely for your benefit, and may be relied
upon only by you.
 
                                          Very truly yours,
 
                                          /s/  Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
                                          Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-J3;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee, Provident Funding Associates, LP,
          HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA), GMAC Mortgage Corporation, Third
          Federal Savings & Loan Association and IndyMac Bank, FSB.


          Date: March 24, 2006


                                          /s/ Steve Bailey
                                          ----------------
                                          Steve Bailey
                                          Senior Managing Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7430

GRADY EDWARD LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MR. ADAM, Mail Service Room, Perry Correctional Institution,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-99-3592-4-18BF)

Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 14, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Grady Edward Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr.,

Samuel Carl Weldon, CLARKSON, WALSH, RHENEY & TURNER, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Grady Edward Lloyd appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Lloyd v. Adam, No. CA-99-3592-4-18BF (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 57843.

protest 185564-K (New York).

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc., and Caspe Knitwear Co. *v.*United States,

*405Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of spun nylon or synthetic textile fiber, plied, the same in all material respects (except that it is plied) as that the subject of *Holeproof Hosiery Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 1366), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.