alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 312

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the States should more closely

regulate title pawn transactions and outlaw the imposition of usurious

interest rates on title loans to consumers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 2000

Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr.

HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. DAVIS

of Florida, and Mr. STEARNS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial

Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the States should

more closely regulate title pawn transactions and outlaw

the imposition of usurious interest rates on title loans

to consumers.

Whereas title loan lenders make title loans and title pawns

to consumers by attaining the consumer’s automobile title

as collateral;

Whereas these loans and pawns are often offered at unscrupulously high rates of interest;

Whereas in many cases borrowers are forced to pay interest

rates of up to 300 percent per year;
2

•HCON 312 IH

Whereas many of these borrowers are unaware of applicable

rates and are forced into deeper and deeper debt to pay

the initial lien;

Whereas this industry takes advantage of uneducated and

poor consumers through usurious and exploitive lending

practices;

Whereas title loans and title pawns threaten the ability of

consumers to hold a job since default on the loan or

pawn will result in repossession and sale of their car,

which is often their only means of transportation to and

from work;

Whereas this industry is expanding rapidly throughout the

United States;

Whereas the States have traditionally protected their citizens

from usurious lending and abusive credit practices;

Whereas a number of States have already resolved this problem on their own without Federal intervention;

Whereas this problem is particularly acute in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico,

Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and

Utah; and

Whereas this problem has the potential to spread to other

States that currently do not closely regulate the title loan

and title pawn industry: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that States

3 should more closely regulate title pawn transactions and
3

•HCON 312 IH

1 outlaw the imposition of usurious interest rates on title

2 loans to consumers.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
 /s/ Patrick G. LePorePatrick G. LePorePresident and Chief Executive OfficerJuly 10, 2007
Before the Second Division,

April 20, 1956

No. 59865.

#### C. J. Van Houten & Zoon, Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 7205-R (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

At the trial, petitioner’s witness testified that, some time prior to the date of entry, petitioner was informed by the customs officials that the appraiser would not accept the prices shown on the invoices; that it was the appraiser’s intention to appraise the merchandise on the basis of foreign value; that the petitioner disagreed; and that one entry was selected as a test case and an appeal to reappraisement was filed, which resulted in a reduction of the value found by the appraiser, but which also left the appraised value higher than the entered value. Upon the record presented, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was, therefore, granted. *P. Pastene & Co. (Inc.)*v. *United States*(21 C. C. P A. 69, T. D. 46392) followed.
No. 57854.

protests 98737-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### S. H. Kress & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer and celluloid sleds similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57902, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before Judge Oliver,

June 13, 1967

No. R67/79.

#### Kay Pee Import Export Co. (Franklin. B. Howland) *v.*United States,

reappraisement R62/8453 (San Francisco).

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and facts are the same in all material respects as those in *Kay Pee Import Export Co.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 696, R.D. 11164), the court found and held that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402a (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that such statutory value is 39 cents per box of 60 pieces, net packed.
No. 55078.

#### Victor Shelton *v.*United States,

protests 165738-K and 165832-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those *324passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60524 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARRY RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:93-CR-3-WS

- - - - - - - - - - July 17, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Richardson, federal prisoner # 03436-043, appeals the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Richardson contends that his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) should be vacated. He argues that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because he did not comprehend the meaning of “use” and “carry” and that the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States , 116No. 96-60524 - 2 - S. Ct. 501 (1995), illustrates Congress’ intent that active employment of a gun be evident under both the “use” and “carry” prongs of § 924(c)(1). We have reviewed the record and the briefs and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Richardson , No. 4:96-cv-1WS (S.D. Mississippi July 16, 1996). Richardson’s motion to file an out-of-time reply brief is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
No. 57860.

protests 77148-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

*409Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753).
AirResources Board

Mary 0. Nichols, Chairman

1Q01 I Street• P.O. Box 2815

Matthew Rodriquez Sacramento, California 95812 www.arb.ca.gov Edmund G. Brown Jr.

Secretary for Governor

Environmental Protection

October 7, 2011

Mr. Andrew Steckel

Rules Office Chief

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region 9 (Air-4)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, California 94105-3901

Dear Mr. Steckel:

I am responding to your inquiry related to revisions to California’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) that were submitted to your office on January 28, 2011. The revision

consisted of various amendments to the Air Resources Board’s (ARB) Regulation for

Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products, title 17, California Code of Regulations, sections 94508-94517 (Consumer Products Regulation). You asked whether this

revision was to include ARB’s Method 310: “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Consumer Products and Reactive Organic Compounds in Aerosol

Coating Products” (Method 310). I understand that Ms. Judy Yee of my staff, and

Mr. Stanley Tong of your staff, have discussed this question.

The rulemaking action that was the subject of our January 28, 2011, SIP revision did

include amendments to Method 310. However, we did not intend for Method 310 to be

included as a SIP revision. I understand that you have previously approved an older

version of Method 310 for use in enforcing the Consumer Products Regulations. In light of this, I believe it would be appropriate to use the amended Method 310 to replace the

previously approved version.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 324-8028. Legal questions

should be directed to Mr. Robert Jenne, Assistant Chief Counsel, Office of Legal Affairs,

at (916) 322-3762.

Si

Carla .Thkemoto, Chief

Consumer Products and New Strategies Branch

Planning and Technical Support Division

cc: See next page.

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption.

For a list ofsimple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.gov.

California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on Recycled Paper
Mr. Andrew Steckel

October 7, 2011

Page 2

cc: Mr. Stanley Tong

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region 9 (Air-4)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, California 94105-3901

Mr. Robert Jenne

Assistant Chief Counsel

Office of Legal Affairs

Ms. Judy Yee, Manager

Implementation Section

Planning and Technical Support Division

C
EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-129168) pertaining to the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan of NCI, Inc. of our reports dated April 3, 2007, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Karta Technologies, Inc. and affiliate included in the
Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed September 10, 2007 (File No. 000-51579), which is incorporated in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Padgett, Stratemann & Co., L.L.P.
|                                     
|San Antonio, Texas                   
|                                     
|March 5, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 268 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 268

 Supporting a National Day of Honor for African American World War II 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2000

  Ms. Brown of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting a National Day of Honor for African American World War II 
                               veterans.

Whereas World War II was a determining event of the 20th century in securing 
        democracy over fascism in many parts of the world;
Whereas the United States called upon all its citizens to provide service and 
        sacrifice to achieve the Allied victory over fascism;
Whereas over 1,200,000 African Americans were among the 16,535,000 Americans who 
        served in the Armed Forces in World War II, including those who gave the 
        ultimate sacrifice, their lives;
Whereas many of the deeds of those African Americans were not fully reported and 
        honored until decades after the Allied victory; and
Whereas various organizations will recognize May 25, 2000, as a National Day of 
        Honor for African American World War II veterans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Congress supports the goals and ideas of a 
National Day of Honor for African American World War II veterans.
                                 <all>
```
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol

NATO.public of Hungary, and the Czech Republic, intobers of NATO, the Republic of Poland, the Re-(NATO) and welcoming the three newest memsary of the North Atlantic Treaty Organizationfor a ceremony in honor of the Fiftieth Anniver-
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the United States Cap3 itol is authorized to be used on April 23, 1999, for a cere4 mony in honor of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the North

5 Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and welcoming the
2

•HCON 81 EH

1 three newest members of NATO, the Republic of Poland,

2 the Republic of Hungary, and the Czech Republic, into

3 NATO. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be

4 carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Ar5 chitect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 53363.

protests 73147-K, etc. (New York).

#### Oldetyme Distillers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*126Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC ) Application of: ) ) 21 Air, LLC ) Docket DOT-OST-2015-0043 ) for a certificate ofpublic convenience and ) necessity pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §41102 ) (foreign charter cargo air transportation )



### MOTION OF 21 AIR, LLC FORRULE 12 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT Communications 

### with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: Michael Mendez President & CEO Centreport II 202 CentrePort Drive Suite 310 Greensboro, NC 27409

February 27, 2015 Pierre Murphy Law Offices ofPierre Murphy 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Suite 590 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 776-3980 Facsimile: (202) 776-3975 Email: pmurphy@lopmurphy.com Attorney for 21 Air, LLCBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC ) Application of: ) ) 21 Air, LLC ) Docket DOT-OST-2015-0043 ) for a certificate ofpublic convenience and ) necessity pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §41102 ) (foreign charter cargo air transportation )



### MOTION OF 21 AIR, LLC FORRULE 12 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT Pursuantto Rule 12 ofthe Department's Rules ofPractice, 14 C.F.R. §302.12, 21 Air, LLC ("21 Air" or "Applicant") hereby moves to withhold from public disclosure the contents of the following exhibit to its Application for interstate scheduled air transportation ofpersons, property and mail. 

### In accordance with Rule 12 ofthe Department's Rules ofPractice, eachpage ofthe following exhibits has been marked confidential and is being filed under seal.

Index ofDocuments to be Withheld

Exhibit 21Air-9: Projected Revenues & Profits

This information is protected from public disclosure underthe Freedom ofInformation Act exemption for privileged or confidential financial information. See: 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(4). To be eligible for an exemptionpursuant to Section 552(b)(4), information must fulfill three requirements: (1) the information mustbe commercial or financial innature; (2) the informationmust be obtained from a person outside ofthe U.S. government; and (3) the informationmust be confidential or privileged.

The financial information set forth in Exhibit 21Air-9 relating to projected revenues and expenses is confidential and not otherwise available to the public andthe disclosure ofthe details ofsuch information in 21 Air's application is not required in orderto further the public interest. 21 Airtherefore requests thatthe Department follow its usual policy for such financial information and grant confidentiality. This is the type ofinformation for which the Department routinely grants confidentiality.
WHEREFORE, 21 Air respectfully requests thatthe contents ofthese financial exhibits be accorded confidential treatmentunder Rule 12.

February 27, 2015

2 ' nferre y

### l~~ Offices ofPierre Murphy 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Suite 590 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 776-3980 Facsimile: (202) 776-3975 E-Mail: pmurphy@lopmurphy.com Attorney for 21 Air, LLC
# Official Journal C 457A/19 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 457A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5719 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 457A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5719 December 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 457A/01 | Vacancy notice for the position of Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) London (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 15) — COM/2014/10367 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2014/C 457A/01

Vacancy notice for the position of Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) London (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 15) — COM/2014/10367

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 457A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 7 |

2014/C 457A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# L_2022117EN.01011801.xml

| 19.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/118 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/118

---

to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/397 of 9 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 9 March 2022
  )

On page 47, in the Annex, in the table, in entry 776, in the ‘Name’ column

for:

‘Sergey Borisovich IVANOV

(Сергей Борисович ИВАНОВ)’

read:

‘Sergey Pavlovich IVANOV

(Сергей Павлович ИВАНОВ)’

---
----

----

|   | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:   George Bee               |   |
| Title:   Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Date: April 30, 2015                  |   |

----

----
No. 62931.

#### L. Batlin & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6894 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain switch plates similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 60629, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.7

                                    EXHIBIT A

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                              MFH FINANCIAL TRUST I

         THIS Certificate of Trust of MFH Financial Trust I (the "Trust") is
being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a
statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801
et seq.)(the "Act").

         1.       Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is MFH
Financial Trust I.

         2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the
trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company,
Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001,
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

         3.       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate in
accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

                                          WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY

                                          By: /s/ Joann A. Rozell
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Joann A. Rozell
                                              Title: Financial Services Officer

                                          /s/ Michael L. Falcone
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          MICHAEL L. FALCONE, as Trustee

                                          /s/ William S. Harrison
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          WILLIAM S. HARRISON, as Trustee

                                          /s/ Mark K. Joseph
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          MARK K. JOSEPH, as Trustee
No. 52436.

protests 684730-G, etc. (New York).

#### Frank Allaire Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.