alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 415

Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be established a

National Children’s Memorial Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Mr. KNOLLENBERG (for himself and Mr. OSE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be

established a National Children’s Memorial Day.

Whereas approximately 80,000 infants, children, teenagers,

and young adults of families living throughout the United

States die each year from myriad causes;

Whereas the death of an infant child, teenager, or young

adult of a family is considered to be one of the greatest

tragedies that a parent or family will ever endure during

a lifetime; and

Whereas a supportive environment and empathy and understanding are considered critical factors in the healing

process of a family that is coping with and recovering

from the loss of a loved one: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 415 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that there

4 should be established a National Children’s Memo5 rial Day; and

6 (2) the Congress requests that the President

7 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the

8 United States to observe such a day with appro9 priate ceremonies and activities in remembrance of

10 the many infants, children, teenagers, and young

11 adults in the United States who have died.

Æ
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, I, William R.
Stewart, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(a) This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 4, 2006

                                        /s/ William R. Stewart
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        William R. Stewart
                                        Chief Executive Officer
# L_2022335EN.01011301.xml

| 29.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/113 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/113

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2022/2417 of 26 July 2022 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 318 of 12 December 2022
  )

| 1. | The title on the contents page and the title on page 1: |
| --- | --- |

1.

The title on the contents page and the title on page 1:

for:

‘... of 26 July 2022 ...’,

read:

‘... of 5 December 2022 ...’.

| 2. | On page 3, where the place and date of adoption are cited: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 3, where the place and date of adoption are cited:

for:

‘Done at Brussels, 26 July 2022.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 5 December 2022.’.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated February 5, 1999, except for Note 12 as to which the
date is July  , 1999, with respect to the financial statements of Rockford
Corporation included in the Registration Statement (Form S-1) and in the related
Prospectus of Rockford Corporation for the registration of shares of its common
stock.

     Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Rockford
Corporation listed in Item 16. This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
May 24, 1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The foregoing consent is in the form that will be signed upon the
completion of the restatement of the capital accounts described in Note 12 to
the financial statements.

                                          /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
May 24, 1999
**Exhibit 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

**Subsidiaries of ICx Technologies, Inc.**

Agentase, LLC (PA) 

Amphitech HoldingsCorp. (DE) 

Amphitech Systems, Inc. (Canada) 

a/k/a ICx Radars 

DAQ Electronics, Inc. (NJ) 

Security 2000, Inc. (NJ) 

GHC Technologies, Inc. (CA) 

Griffin Analytical Technologies, Inc. (IN) 

ICx Cryogenics, Inc. (DE) 

ICx ImagingSystems f/k/a Digital Imaging Infrared (DE) 

ICx Photonics f/k/a Ion Optics, Inc. (DE) 

ICx Radiation, Inc. (TN) 

ICx RadiationGmbh (Germany) 

ICx Surveillance Canada, Inc. (DE) 

360 Surveillance Inc. (Canada) 

Chilkoot Design Ltd. (Canada) 

Davidson Technologies Ltd. (Canada) 

PBA Engineering Ltd. (Canada) 

Peter Boudreau & Associates Ltd. (Canada) 

ICx Tactical Platforms f/k/a New Heights ManufacturingInc. (GA) 

ICx Transportation Group, Inc. (DE) 

MesoSystems Technology, Inc. (WA) 

Nomadics, Inc. (OK) 

Engius, LLC (OK) 

Strala Materials, Inc. (OK) 

Nanomadics, Inc. (OK) 

VigiLink Corporation (OK) 

PureTech Systems Inc. (AZ) 

S3I Acquisition Corporation (DE) 

Sensor Technologies and Systems, Inc. (AZ) 

a/k/a ICx Radars
Before the First Division,

January 22, 1947

No. 51532.

#### Protests 24741-K, etc., of Brazilian Minerals & Timbers Co. et al. (Philadelphia and St. Louis).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 59368.

protests 909740-G, 94297-K, and 21626-K (New York).

#### Kung Chen Fur Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1043, *supra. .*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







**AMERICAN
      TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
      E.
      Durkin, III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




August
              10,
              2007*/s/
THOMAS
                E. DURKIN, III***
            *THOMAS
                E. DURKIN, III*
              *PRESIDENT*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the use of our report dated May 5, 1999, except for Note 6,
as to which the date is July 7, 1999, in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement (Form S-1) and related Prospectus of Takes.com,Inc. for the
registration of 3,248,750 shares of its common stock and 300,000,000 warrants
to purchase 10,000,000 additional shares of its common stock.


                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
July 7, 1999
No. 58783.

protest 236466-K (New York).

#### H. Teason Wool Waste Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
No. P67/423.

#### National Aniline Div., Allied Chemical Corp., and D.C. Andrews *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 66/36223, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of drawtwister machines and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline Division, and Alltransport, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Toyota Motor Manufacturing



# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

May 28, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00276

- CV

Martin M. PARRA

, Appellant

v.

TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING TEXAS, INC., Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 20505 Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on May 22, 2014. The clerk’s record contains appellant’s notice of appeal in which he states his intention to appeal the trial court’s March 24, 2014 judgment compelling arbitration. The clerk’s record also con tains a document entitled “Judge’s Notes” which are the trial court’s handwritten notations regarding a ruling made at a hearing. A judge’s handwritten notes are for his or her own convenience and form no part of the record. In re A.W. , 384 S.W.3d 872, 8 73 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2012, no pet.). Accordingly, the “Judge’s Notes” contained in the clerk’s record is not a final , appealable order. In re L.H.
, No. 04

- 13

- 00174

- CV, 2013 WL 3804585, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio July 17, 2013, no pet.). In respon se to an inquiry by the clerk’s office of this court, the trial court clerk stated that no order was signed in reference to the trial judge’s notes. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

MARTHA'S VINEYARDIDUKES 

COUNTY FISHERMEN'S 

ASSOCIATION 

and 

MICHAEL S. FLAHERTY, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GARY LOCKE, in his official capacity 

as Secretary of the Department of 

Commerce, et al. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 10-1580 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

rl of September, 2011, hereby 

ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#25] is GRANTED; it is 

further 

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

1
PUBLIC LAW 111–78—OCT. 19, 2009 123 STAT. 2085 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2913: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–240 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

July 31, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–78 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street in Key 

West, Florida, as the ‘‘Sidney M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street 

in Key West, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sidney 

M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse 

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

‘‘Sidney M. Aronovitz United States Courthouse’’. 

Approved October 19, 2009. 

Oct. 19, 2009 

[H.R. 2913] 

jbender on DSKFWWRZC1 with PUBLIC LAWS
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Form 10Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, Evan J. Griffith,
General Manager of Chugach Electric Association, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)  such Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with
         the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934; and

     2)  the information contained in such Form 10Q for the quarter
         ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of Chugach
         Electric Association, Inc.


         August 13, 2002                     /s/ Evan J. Griffith
         ---------------
                                             Evan J. Griffith
                                             General Manager
No. 60334.

protests 253852-K, etc. (New York).

#### Edward Hornstein, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
mgcns8ex103


    
      


      
        Exhibit 10.3


        EMPLOYMENT AND FEE AGREEMENT


        THIS AGREEMENT made this 4th day of September, 2003, by and between Magic Media Networks, Inc. (hereinafter “CLIENT”) with a mailing address of 530 N Federal Highway, Ft. Lauderdale, FL  33301 and RICHARD P. GREENE, P.A., (hereinafter “ATTORNEY”).


        1.  CLIENT retains ATTORNEY to represent CLIENT as Attorney at Law regarding Corporate/Securities related matters and authorizes and empowers ATTORNEY to do all things reasonably necessary to complete corporate and securities transactions with CLIENT'S consent (other than in connection with capital raising transactions) and agrees to retain attorney for the services rendered on the following terms and conditions:

      

    


    
      
        a.       On the basis of the time expended by ATTORNEY, a retainer shall consist of 100,000 shares of common stock of Magic Media Networks, Inc.  All referenced shares shall be registered pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-8.

      


      
        
          b.      CLIENT shall also be responsible for costs incurred including, but not limited to, long distance phone calls, transcripts, photocopies, postage, filing fees, and costs of newspaper publications.  Advanced costs that are not expended during the course of the representation are to be returned to the client at the conclusion of the representation, unless ATTORNEY and CLIENT agree otherwise in writing.
        

      

    


    
      
        2.      ATTORNEY will render a final statement for services rendered and costs incurred. If CLIENT disagrees with any charge for fees or costs, CLIENT must notify ATTORNEY in writing within 10 days after the date of mailing.  Otherwise, all charges are agreed by CLIENT to be approved and accepted.  All bills are due when rendered.


        3.      CLIENT understands and agrees that ATTORNEY has made no guarantee regarding the successful outcome or termination of the engagement and all expressions pertaining thereto are matters of opinion. Should it be necessary to institute legal proceedings for the collection of any part of the ATTORNEY'S compensation or costs as set forth above, then CLIENT agrees to pay all court costs and reasonable attorneys fees with regard to the collection of same.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the date first mentioned above.


        ACCEPTED:

      


      	 	Richard P. Greene, P.A.	 	 	
            Magic Media Networks, Inc.

          
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	
            /s/ Richard P. Greene

          	 	
            By: 

          	
            /s/ Gordon Scott Venters

          
	 	
            

          	 	 	
            
              

            

          
	 	Richard P. Greene	 	 	
            Gordon Scott Venters, CEO & President
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 5, 2015 1 06486

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADAM DAY, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 9, 2015 Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Rose, JJ.

__________ John Ferrara, Monticello, for appellant. James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Michael J. Andreani of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Lahtinen, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered December 19, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts). Faced with a five-count indictment and potential lengthy consecutive sentences, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in satisfaction of the indictment and waived his right to appeal in exchange for a prison sentence of either 51⁄2 or 6 years. County Court sentenced defendant, a second felony offender, to six years in prison followed by a period of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals arguing that his sentence is excessive.-2- 106486

We affirm. Assuming, without deciding, that defendant's appeal waiver was invalid so as to permit consideration of the sentence issue (see People v Rolley, 100 AD3d 1263, 1263-1264 [2012]; People v Caines, 268 AD2d 790, 791 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 833 [2000]; cf. People v Vellon, 128 AD3d 1274, 1275 [2015]), we nevertheless find neither an abuse of discretion nor extraordinary circumstances meriting a reduction of defendant's sentence in light of his criminal record and the imposition of a sentence within the agreed range (see People v Rabideau, 130 AD3d 1094, 1095 [2015]). Peters, P.J., Garry and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.2


                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY


      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned constitutes and
appoints Scott A. Schuff and Kenneth F. Zylstra, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place, and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Schuff Steel Company, a Delaware corporation, together with any and all
amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto,
and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting to such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      DATED: January 31, 1998


                                    /s/ Dennis DeConcini
                                    Dennis DeConcini
<PAGE>   2
STATE OF Arizona        )
                        )
County of Maricopa      )



      On this 31st day of January, 1998, before me, the undersigned Notary
Public, personally appeared David A. Schuff, known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed
the same for the purposes therein contained.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.


                                    /s/ Evelin R. Lackey
                                    Notary Public

My commission expires:

   July 14, 2000
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-090
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor