alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                          19,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,643
<INVENTORY>                                    120,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,620
<PP&E>                                          40,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,775
<SALES>                                        371,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,412
<CGS>                                          214,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.79
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 93/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.093.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 93 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 563 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.093.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 93

English edition

Legislation

Volume 563 April 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 283/2013 of 1 March 2013 setting out the data requirements for active substances, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2013 of 1 March 2013 setting out the data requirements for plant protection products, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1) | 85 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 283/2013 of 1 March 2013 setting out the data requirements for active substances, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1)

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2013 of 1 March 2013 setting out the data requirements for plant protection products, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1)

85

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Order entered December 31 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 01556

- CV

IN RE ANTONIO CHAVEZ, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 86th Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 23284

- 84



### O RDER

Justices Lang, Fillmore and Brown

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
No. 63380.

protests 59/4185, 59/4187, and 59/4188 (Boston).

#### Selig Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by T.D. 51802, or at 19 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108, was sustained.
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended April 30, 2009, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/ THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
No. 58367.

protest 223992-K (New York).

#### Overseas Commerce Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Randel G. Owen, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of Emergency Medical Services Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: May 2, 2011

 
| /s/   Randel G. Owen |                      |
|----------------------|---------------------------|
| Name:                | Randel   G. Owen          |   |
| Title:               | Chief   Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit
23.2


SCOTT
      WILSON RPA
              www.scottwilson.com
 
 
 Suite
      50155
      University AvenueP.O.
      Box 55Toronto,
      Ontario M5J 2H7Tel:
      (416) 947-0907
                Fax:
      (416) 947-0395
                Email: graham.clow@scottwilson.com
 March 24,
2008
   Via
SEC
  CONSENT
  
 
 Dear
Sirs/Mesdames:
  Reference
is made to the technical reports dated February 17, 2006, March 14, 2006 and
July 31, 2006, entitled respectively, "Technical Report on the Sabara Project,
Minas Gerais, Brazil," "Technical Report on the Turmalina Gold Project,
Pitangui, Minas Gerais, Brazil" and "Technical Report on the Turmalina Gold
Project, Pitangui, Minas Gerais, Brazil," in each case prepared for Jaguar
Mining Inc. by Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. or, in the case of the July 31,
2006 report, its successor Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates
Inc.
  The
undersigned hereby consents to the inclusion of the above reports, our name and
references to and excerpts from these reports in the Form 40-F to be filed with
the SEC.
   Yours
very truly,
   /s/
Graham G. Clow
  Graham G.
Clow, P.Eng..
 Managing
Director
 Scott
Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc
Before the First Division,

October 6, 1958

No. 62350.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 330631-K, 58/778, and 58/4488 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55064.

#### Emil Buschoff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 149463-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Louis J. Brothers, Chief Executive Officer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: April 13, 2010

By:   */s/ Louis J. Brothers*

Louis J. Brothers

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial 

Officer, and Chairman of the Board

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The information contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES


-        Medicis, The Dermatology Company

-        Medicis Dermatologics, Inc.

-        Dermavest, Inc.

-        Advanced Pharmaceutical Research

-        Medicis Acquisition Corporation

-        Medicis Manufacturing Corporation

-        Medicis Partners, Inc.

-        Medicis Consumer Products Company, LLC

-        GenDerm, Inc.

-        Medicis Canada, Ltd.
Acetone Fire Risk Video

Submitted by W. M. Barr & Company on August 15, 2011

Unfortunately, we are not able to upload videos in this sytem. If you would like to see this

video, please contact Andy Steckel at steckel.andrew@epa.gov or Lisa Tharp at

tharp.lisa@epa.gov

.

Thank you.
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 16 2- CR Antonio OLVEDA , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 226th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CR8045 Honora ble Sid L . Har le, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice

Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: March 10, 2010 DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON Th e tr ia l c ou rt

imp os e d s e nte nc e in t

he un de rl y ingc a

us e on Se pte mbe r 28 , 20 09
. No tim e ly motion for new tria l having been f iled, appellant’ s notice of a ppeal wa s due to be filed no la ter than October 28, 2009. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2. Appellant’s notice of appea l w as not f iled with the trial court c lerk until Fe bruar

y 16, 2010. This court lac ks jurisdiction over an a p p ea l o f a cr iminal conviction in the abse nce of a timely , written notice of appea l. Se e Ol iv o v . S

tat e , 918 S.W .2d 519, 52 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 96 ); se e als o A te r v . E igh th C ou rt o f A pp e als , 8 02 S.W. 2d

24 1 ( Te x. Cr im.04 -10 -00 16 2-CR

- 2- App. 1991) (out- of-time appe al from f inal felony

conviction may

be soug ht by filing a

writ of habe as
c or pu s p ur su a nt t o a

rt ic le 11 .0 7 o f t

he Te xas Cod e of

Cr imi na l Pr oc e dure ); Ap t v . S tat e , No. 04-03- 00 88 5- CR, 20 04 WL 73 08 32 , a t *1 (T e x. Ap p. —Sa n An ton io Ap r. 7, 20 04 , no pe t.) (u nli ke ru le in
c ivi l c a se s, no tic e of

a pp e a l f ile d w itha

pp e llate c ourt

in c ri min a l c a se is not de e me d f ile d th e same day with the trial court clerk) (not desig nated for publ ication). Acc ording ly , this appeal is dismissed for lac k of jurisdiction. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
No. 59898.

#### Photo-It Company *v.*United States,

protest 266339-K (New York).

*426Opinion by

La whence, J.

When this case was called for hearing, Government counsel conceded that the developing machine for photostat papers should have been classified and assessed, as claimed in the protest. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 28, 2013

NO. 03-13-00035-CV

Westside Community Development Corporation, Appellant

v.

Fayette County Appraisal District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 155TH DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal 

in the above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion 

that same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said 

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that each party 

shall pay the costs of the appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the court below; 

and that this decision be certified below for observance.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEROME ERIC BIVENS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3963

[June 21, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-010590-

CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. 

Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
(Reap. Dec. 10881)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 108, etc.

(Decided January 20, 1965)

*Stem & Shostah*for the plaintiff.

*Jolm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court as to the merchandise covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases which is incorporated herein that on the date of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever *484nature and all others costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values plus the f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress which is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the footwear, etc., covered by the entries, the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, is unlike any articles manufactured or produced in the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper value for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise and that such values were the invoice unit values, plus the f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, Jon Suk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Mystica Candle Corporation, for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Mystica Candle Corporation.


Date: September 26, 2007            By:  /s/ Jon Suk
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Jon Suk, Principal Executive Officer
                                         and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 359 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 359

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the carrying of firearms into 
  places of worship or educational and scholastic settings should be 
                              prohibited.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2000

     Mr. Holt (for himself and Mr. Wexler) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the carrying of firearms into 
  places of worship or educational and scholastic settings should be 
                              prohibited.

Whereas repeated incidents of senseless and horrific gun violence have led many 
        Americans to conclude that neither they nor their children can feel 
        completely secure anywhere at anytime anymore;
Whereas the epidemic of gun violence in the Nation has invaded schools, youth 
        sporting events, places of worship, and other spaces that the American 
        people once thought of as sanctuaries of safety;
Whereas these shootings have shattered the confidence of parents, educators, and 
        clergy in their ability to protect their children from the increasingly 
        dangerous world around them;
Whereas, in response to this trend, Congress has previously acted to protect 
        America's children by prohibiting the possession of firearms in school 
        zones;
Whereas neither American adults nor children should have to fear for their 
        safety when studying, praying in places of worship, or participating in 
        any other activities at or related to their schools or places of 
        worship;
Whereas it is the obligation of America's elected leaders to do all they can to 
        protect children from harm and ensure that adults and children alike can 
        learn, play, or pray in safety; and
Whereas there is no rational reason for anyone other than a law enforcement 
        officer to carry a gun into a place of worship, a school, or a school-
        related event: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the carrying of firearms into 
places of worship or educational and scholastic settings should be 
prohibited.
                                 <all>
```
No. 61164.

protest 292649-K (New York).

#### American Sponge & Chamois Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, counsel for the Government stated that he would not object to the incorporation of the collector’s memorandum and recommended that allowances be made in accordance therewith. Said memorandum (exhibit 1) states that the merchandise was inadvertently assessed with duty on the basis of the original appraised value, although, in view of a reappraisement decision, it was properly dutiable on the basis of the unit entered values. It appears from the official papers that the merchandise consisted of sponges, appraised at the invoice unit values, less discounts, plus certain percentages to make up for shrinkages in weight. An appeal for reappraisement was filed, subsequent to which it was held in a test case that the moisture content of sponges did not affect their price and that the entered values represented the correct dutiable values of the merchandise. *(United States*v. *Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc., James H. Rhodes,*41 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 558). In accordance with this decision and a stipulation of counsel, it was held that the entered values of the instant merchandise represented the correct dutiable values *(American Sponge & Chamois Co., Inc. (Atlas Shipping Co.*—Broker), *et al.*v. *United States,*33 Cust. Ct. 522, Reap. Dec. 8335). On the record presented, it was held that duty should have been assessed on the basis of the unit entered values of the merchandise. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entry accordingly.
Before the First Division,

January 19, 1949

No. 52823.

#### B. L. Lemke and Herman Meyer *v.*United States,

protests 103726-K and 45457-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon v. United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.