alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              SCHUFF STEEL COMPANY
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


         NAME OF ENTITY                        JURISDICTION OR ORGANIZATION

1.       B&K Fabrications, Inc.                         Arizona

2.       Addison Structural Services, Inc.              Florida

3.       Addison Steel, Inc.                            Florida

4.       Quincy Joist Company                           Florida
jQuery(document).ready(function(){

    //for state filters - bigpipe causing interference
    setTimeout(
      function() {
        if (typeof jQuery('#search_filter').val() != 'undefined') {
          var ovalue = jQuery('#search_filter').val();
          var value = jQuery('#search_filter').val().toLowerCase();
          jQuery("#searchable li").filter(function() {
              jQuery(this).toggle(jQuery(this).text().toLowerCase().indexOf(value) > -1)
          });
          if(jQuery('#searchable').children(':visible').length == 0) {
            var job_replace = Drupal.t('There are no job listings to show for @location.', {'@location': ovalue});
            jQuery('.job_status').html("<p>" + job_replace + "</p>");
          }
          //jQuery(".location-set").toggle();
        }
      }, 20);

    jQuery("#search_filter").on("keyup", function() {
        var value = jQuery(this).val().toLowerCase();
        jQuery("#searchable li").filter(function() {
            jQuery(this).toggle(jQuery(this).text().toLowerCase().indexOf(value) > -1)
        });
        if(jQuery('#searchable').children(':visible').length == 0) {
          var job_replace = Drupal.t('There are no job listings to show.');
          jQuery('.job_status').html("<p>" + job_replace + "</p>");
        } else {
          jQuery('.job_status').html("");
        }
    });
    jQuery("#views_search_filter").on("keyup", function() {
        var value = jQuery(this).val().toLowerCase();
        jQuery(".views-row").filter(function() {
            jQuery(this).toggle(jQuery(this).text().toLowerCase().indexOf(value) > -1)
        });
    });


});
# L_2022107DE.01009301.xml

| 6.4.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 107/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 107/93

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2022/328 des Rates vom 25. Februar 2022 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 833/2014 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 49 vom 25. Februar 2022
  )

Seite 98, Anhang VI (neuer Anhang VII, Kategorie III. Teil 2 – Informationssicherheit) unter X.A.III.201, Buchstabe c

Anstatt:

| „c) | als Verschlüsselungs-Software für den Massenmarkt gemäß der Kryptotechnik-Anmerkung (Anmerkung 3 in Kategorie 5, Teil 21) klassifizierte Güter.“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

als Verschlüsselungs-Software für den Massenmarkt gemäß der Kryptotechnik-Anmerkung (Anmerkung 3 in Kategorie 5, Teil 21) klassifizierte Güter.“

1

muss es heißen:

| „c) | als Verschlüsselungs-Hardware für den Massenmarkt gemäß der Kryptotechnik-Anmerkung (Anmerkung 3 in Kategorie 5, Teil 21) klassifizierte Güter.“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

als Verschlüsselungs-Hardware für den Massenmarkt gemäß der Kryptotechnik-Anmerkung (Anmerkung 3 in Kategorie 5, Teil 21) klassifizierte Güter.“.

1

---
H. J. Res. 111

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275 is further amended by striking ‘‘October 14, 2000’’ in

section 106(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October 20, 2000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Clearwire Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: April 13, 2009

/s/ David J. SachDavid J. SachChief Financial Officer
No. 59362.

protests 236194-K, etc. (New York).

#### Kassin Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32% percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18185 and #18186; OKLAHOMA Disaster Number OK-
00172]


Administrative Disaster Declaration of a Rural Area Amendment for 
the State of Oklahoma

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Administrative disaster 
declaration of a rural area for the State of Oklahoma dated 09/20/2023.
    Incident: Rural Area--Severe Storms, Straight-Line Winds and 
Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/14/2023 through 06/18/2023.

DATES: Issued on 10/20/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:11/20/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/20/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an Administrative disaster 
declaration of a rural area for the State of Oklahoma, dated 09/20/2023 
is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected 
by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Pushmataha.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-23745 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 49

  To designate the Village of Sunbury, Ohio, as ``Flagville, U.S.A.''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1999

    Mr. Kasich introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate the Village of Sunbury, Ohio, as ``Flagville, U.S.A.''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Village of Sunbury, 
Ohio, is designated as ``Flagville, U.S.A.'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the Village of Sunbury, Ohio, to display the United States flag on 
National holidays and regularly during the year.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7650

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. GABRIEL DANIEL MORRISON MITCHELL, a/k/a G , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 4:12

- cr - 00010

- MSD

- LRL

- 2 ; 4:16

- cv 00004

- MSD )

Submitted : August 6, 2018 Decided: October 24, 2018

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Gabriel Daniel Morrison Mitchell , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gabriel Daniel Mor rison Mitchell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A
cert ificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that r easonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies reli ef on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently revi ewed the record and conclude that Mitchell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, while we grant Mitchell’s motion to supplement his memorandum in support of a certificate of appealability, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to p roceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                   3,406
<SECURITIES>                                                            25,217
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        31,206
<PP&E>                                                                  18,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           4,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          47,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    2,242
<BONDS>                                                                  8,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                    99
<OTHER-SE>                                                              37,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            47,782
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                           125
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         3,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        (3,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (3,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           (3,072)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (.31)
        


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kennedy Kerster, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Icon Development Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the fiscal Year  ended June 30, 2006, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                      



| | By:    | /s/Kennedy Kerster               
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | Kennedy Kerster                  
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | September 22, 2006               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-KB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7351

LARRY D. MOSLEY,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PHILLIP A. WHITE, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:21-cv-00435-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: September 20, 2023 Decided: October 12, 2023

Before WYNN, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry D. Mosley, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7351 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/12/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry D. Mosley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 

100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mosley has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We grant Mosley’s motion to exceed length limitations on his informal brief. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7351 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/12/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1267

_____________________________

PRESTON ENNIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

July 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Case No. 14,301.

#### TWO STEAM BOILERS.

[Cited in The Marquette, Oase No. 9.101. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
No. 57125.

protest 171435-K (Los Angeles).

#### Frederick F. Straus *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the collector assessed the merchandise as dishes rather than as plates. However, after investigation, the Bureau of Customs changed its ruling and stated that articles such as those in question should have been classified as plates. In view of the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.