# Official Journal L 109/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.109.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 109 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5521 April 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.109.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 109

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5521 April 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 347/2012 of 16 April 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to type-approval requirements for certain categories of motor vehicles with regard to advanced emergency braking systems | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 348/2012 of 20 April 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 18 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/201/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 26 March 2012 amending Decision 98/213/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards internal partition kits
  (notified under document C(2012) 1866)

   (
  1
  ) | 20 |
| | | 2012/202/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 29 March 2012 amending Decision 1999/94/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards precast normal/lightweight/autoclaved aerated concrete products
  (notified under document C(2012) 1977)

   (
  1
  ) | 22 |
| | | 2012/203/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 19 April 2012 amending Annex I to Decision 2006/766/EC as regards the entry for Chile in the list of third countries from which imports of live, chilled, frozen or processed bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods for human consumption are permitted
  (notified under document C(2012) 2446)

   (
  1
  ) | 24 |
| | | 2012/204/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 19 April 2012 amending the Annexes to Decision 2003/467/EC as regards the declaration of Latvia as officially brucellosis-free Member State and of certain regions of Italy, Poland and Portugal as officially tuberculosis-free, brucellosis-free and enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions
  (notified under document C(2012) 2451)

   (
  1
  ) | 26 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 347/2012 of 16 April 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to type-approval requirements for certain categories of motor vehicles with regard to advanced emergency braking systems

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 348/2012 of 20 April 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

18

DECISIONS

2012/201/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 26 March 2012 amending Decision 98/213/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards internal partition kits
  (notified under document C(2012) 1866)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2012) 1866)

1

20

2012/202/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 29 March 2012 amending Decision 1999/94/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards precast normal/lightweight/autoclaved aerated concrete products
  (notified under document C(2012) 1977)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2012) 1977)

1

22

2012/203/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 19 April 2012 amending Annex I to Decision 2006/766/EC as regards the entry for Chile in the list of third countries from which imports of live, chilled, frozen or processed bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods for human consumption are permitted
  (notified under document C(2012) 2446)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2012) 2446)

1

24

2012/204/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 19 April 2012 amending the Annexes to Decision 2003/467/EC as regards the declaration of Latvia as officially brucellosis-free Member State and of certain regions of Italy, Poland and Portugal as officially tuberculosis-free, brucellosis-free and enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions
  (notified under document C(2012) 2451)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2012) 2451)

1

26

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 347/2012

of 16 April 2012

implementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with respect to type-approval requirements for certain categories of motor vehicles with regard to advanced emergency braking systems

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor (1), and in particular Article 14(1)(a) and Article 14(3)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 is a separate Regulation for the purposes of the type-approval procedure provided for by Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 is a separate Regulation for the purposes of the type-approval procedure provided for by Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) (2).

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 lays down basic requirements for the type-approval of motor vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 with regard to the installation of advanced emergency braking systems (AEBS). It is necessary to set out the specific procedures, tests and requirements for such type-approval. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 lays down basic requirements for the type-approval of motor vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 with regard to the installation of advanced emergency braking systems (AEBS). It is necessary to set out the specific procedures, tests and requirements for such type-approval.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 lays down a general obligation for vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 to be equipped with an AEBS. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 lays down a general obligation for vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 to be equipped with an AEBS.

| (4) | Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 provides that the Commission may adopt measures exempting certain vehicles or classes of vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 from the obligation to install AEBS under certain conditions. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 provides that the Commission may adopt measures exempting certain vehicles or classes of vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 from the obligation to install AEBS under certain conditions.

| (5) | An analysis of cost/benefits and of technical and safety aspects has demonstrated that more lead time will be necessary before wide ranging requirements for AEBS can be applied to all types of vehicle of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3. In particular attention has to be given to the braking technology and rear axle suspension system used on those vehicles when specifying detailed rules concerning the specific test and technical requirements for the type-approval of those vehicles with regard to their AEBS. It is therefore appropriate to implement those requirements in two stages, starting with an approval level 1, which contains appropriate collision warning and emergency braking requirements for types of vehicle of categories M3 and N3 as well as types of vehicle of category N2 with a maximum mass exceeding 8 tonnes, provided that these types of vehicle are equipped with pneumatic or air-over-hydraulic braking systems and with pneumatic rear axle suspension systems. Those requirements should be further extended and complemented in a second stage, through an approval level 2, to also apply to types of vehicle with hydraulic braking systems and non-pneumatic rear axle suspension systems and to include types of vehicle of category M2 and of category N2 with a maximum mass not exceeding 8 tonnes. The timing for implementing the approval level 2 should provide sufficient lead time for gaining further experience with those systems and enable further technical developments in this field, as well as for the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) to adopt international harmonised performance and test requirements for the types of vehicle of the categories concerned. Therefore, no later than two years before the implementation date for the approval level 2, the Commission shall adopt the warning and braking activation test criteria for types of vehicle of category M2 and of category N2 with a maximum mass not exceeding 8 tonnes, taking into consideration the further developments at UNECE level on this issue. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

An analysis of cost/benefits and of technical and safety aspects has demonstrated that more lead time will be necessary before wide ranging requirements for AEBS can be applied to all types of vehicle of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3. In particular attention has to be given to the braking technology and rear axle suspension system used on those vehicles when specifying detailed rules concerning the specific test and technical requirements for the type-approval of those vehicles with regard to their AEBS. It is therefore appropriate to implement those requirements in two stages, starting with an approval level 1, which contains appropriate collision warning and emergency braking requirements for types of vehicle of categories M3 and N3 as well as types of vehicle of category N2 with a maximum mass exceeding 8 tonnes, provided that these types of vehicle are equipped with pneumatic or air-over-hydraulic braking systems and with pneumatic rear axle suspension systems. Those requirements should be further extended and complemented in a second stage, through an approval level 2, to also apply to types of vehicle with hydraulic braking systems and non-pneumatic rear axle suspension systems and to include types of vehicle of category M2 and of category N2 with a maximum mass not exceeding 8 tonnes. The timing for implementing the approval level 2 should provide sufficient lead time for gaining further experience with those systems and enable further technical developments in this field, as well as for the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) to adopt international harmonised performance and test requirements for the types of vehicle of the categories concerned. Therefore, no later than two years before the implementation date for the approval level 2, the Commission shall adopt the warning and braking activation test criteria for types of vehicle of category M2 and of category N2 with a maximum mass not exceeding 8 tonnes, taking into consideration the further developments at UNECE level on this issue.

| (6) | The cost/benefit analysis has also demonstrated that the mandatory application of AEBS would generate more costs than benefits and proves therefore not to be appropriate for the following classes of vehicles: category N2 semi-trailer towing vehicles with a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes but not exceeding 8 tonnes, categories M2 and M3 vehicles of Class A, Class I and Class II, and articulated buses of category M3 of Class A, Class I and Class II. In addition, technical and physical constraints make it impossible to install the collision detection equipment in a way that would ensure their reliable functioning on certain special purpose vehicles, off-road vehicles and vehicles with more than three axles. Vehicles of those categories should therefore be exempted from the obligation to install AEBS. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The cost/benefit analysis has also demonstrated that the mandatory application of AEBS would generate more costs than benefits and proves therefore not to be appropriate for the following classes of vehicles: category N2 semi-trailer towing vehicles with a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes but not exceeding 8 tonnes, categories M2 and M3 vehicles of Class A, Class I and Class II, and articulated buses of category M3 of Class A, Class I and Class II. In addition, technical and physical constraints make it impossible to install the collision detection equipment in a way that would ensure their reliable functioning on certain special purpose vehicles, off-road vehicles and vehicles with more than three axles. Vehicles of those categories should therefore be exempted from the obligation to install AEBS.

| (7) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Technical Committee — Motor Vehicles, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Technical Committee — Motor Vehicles,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Scope

This Regulation applies to motor vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3, as defined in Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC, with the exception of the following:

2

3

2

3

| (1) | semi-trailer towing vehicles of category N2 with a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 but not exceeding 8 tonnes; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

semi-trailer towing vehicles of category N2 with a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 but not exceeding 8 tonnes;

2

| (2) | categories M2 and M3 vehicles of Class A, Class I and Class II; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

categories M2 and M3 vehicles of Class A, Class I and Class II;

2

3

| (3) | category M3 articulated buses of Class A, Class I and Class II; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

category M3 articulated buses of Class A, Class I and Class II;

3

| (4) | off-road vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 as referred to in points 4.2 and 4.3 of Part A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(4)

off-road vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 as referred to in points 4.2 and 4.3 of Part A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC;

2

3

2

3

| (5) | special purpose vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 as referred to in point 5 of Part A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(5)

special purpose vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 as referred to in point 5 of Part A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC;

2

3

2

3

| (6) | vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 with more than three axles. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 with more than three axles.

2

3

2

3

Article 2

Definitions

For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions laid down in Directive 2007/46/EC and in Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 shall apply.

In addition, the following definitions shall apply:

| (1) | ‘type of vehicle with regard to its advanced emergency braking system’ (AEBS) means a category of vehicles which do not differ in essential respects, including as to:






  (a) | the manufacturer’s trade name or trade mark; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(1)

‘type of vehicle with regard to its advanced emergency braking system’ (AEBS) means a category of vehicles which do not differ in essential respects, including as to:

(a)

the manufacturer’s trade name or trade mark;

| (b) | vehicle features which significantly influence the performances of the AEBS; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

vehicle features which significantly influence the performances of the AEBS;

| (c) | the type and design of the AEBS; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the type and design of the AEBS;

| (2) | ‘subject vehicle’ means the vehicle being tested; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

‘subject vehicle’ means the vehicle being tested;

| (3) | ‘target’ means a high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon as defined in point 1 of Section C of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC or, in the case of a soft target, an object representative of such a vehicle in terms of its detection characteristics applicable to the sensor system of the AEBS under test; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

‘target’ means a high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon as defined in point 1 of Section C of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC or, in the case of a soft target, an object representative of such a vehicle in terms of its detection characteristics applicable to the sensor system of the AEBS under test;

1

| (4) | ‘soft target’ means a target that will suffer minimum damage and cause minimum damage to the subject vehicle in the event of a collision; |
| --- | --- |

(4)

‘soft target’ means a target that will suffer minimum damage and cause minimum damage to the subject vehicle in the event of a collision;

| (5) | ‘moving target’ means a target travelling at a constant speed in the same direction and in the centre of the same lane of travel as the subject vehicle; |
| --- | --- |

(5)

‘moving target’ means a target travelling at a constant speed in the same direction and in the centre of the same lane of travel as the subject vehicle;

| (6) | ‘stationary target’ means a target at standstill facing the same direction and positioned on the centre of the same test lane of travel as the subject vehicle; |
| --- | --- |

(6)

‘stationary target’ means a target at standstill facing the same direction and positioned on the centre of the same test lane of travel as the subject vehicle;

| (7) | ‘collision warning phase’ means the phase directly preceding the emergency braking phase, during which the AEBS warns the driver of a potential forward collision; |
| --- | --- |

(7)

‘collision warning phase’ means the phase directly preceding the emergency braking phase, during which the AEBS warns the driver of a potential forward collision;

| (8) | ‘emergency braking phase’ means the phase starting when the AEBS emits a braking demand for at least 4 m/s2 deceleration to the service braking system of the vehicle; |
| --- | --- |

(8)

‘emergency braking phase’ means the phase starting when the AEBS emits a braking demand for at least 4 m/s2 deceleration to the service braking system of the vehicle;

2

| (9) | ‘common space’ means an area on which two or more information functions may be displayed, but not simultaneously; |
| --- | --- |

(9)

‘common space’ means an area on which two or more information functions may be displayed, but not simultaneously;

| (10) | ‘self-check’ means an integrated function that checks for a system failure on a semi-continuous basis at least while the system is active; |
| --- | --- |

(10)

‘self-check’ means an integrated function that checks for a system failure on a semi-continuous basis at least while the system is active;

| (11) | ‘time to collision (TTC)’ means the value of time obtained by dividing the distance between the subject vehicle and the target by the relative speed of the subject vehicle and the target, at an instant in time. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

‘time to collision (TTC)’ means the value of time obtained by dividing the distance between the subject vehicle and the target by the relative speed of the subject vehicle and the target, at an instant in time.

Article 3

Obligations of the Member States

1.   With effect from 1 November 2013, national authorities shall refuse, on grounds relating to the AEBS, to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval in respect of new types of vehicle which do not comply with the requirements set out in Annexes II and III, with the exception of the approval level 2 requirements in Annex II and the pass/fail criteria set out in Appendix 2 to that Annex and with the exception of vehicles not equipped with pneumatic rear axle suspension.

2.   With effect from 1 November 2015, national authorities shall, on grounds relating to the AEBS, consider certificates of conformity in respect of new vehicles to be no longer valid for the purposes of Article 26 of Directive 2007/46/EC, and prohibit the registration, sale and entry into service of such vehicles, where such vehicles do not comply with the requirements set out in Annexes II and III, with the exception of the approval level 2 requirements in Annex II and the pass/fail criteria set out in Appendix 2 to that Annex and with the exception of vehicles not equipped with pneumatic rear axle suspension.

3.   With effect from 1 November 2016 national authorities shall refuse, on grounds relating to the AEBS, to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval in respect of new types of vehicle which do not comply with the requirements set out in Annexes II and III, including the approval level 2 requirements in Annex II and the pass/fail criteria set out Appendix 2 to that Annex.

4.   With effect from 1 November 2018, national authorities shall, on grounds relating to the AEBS, consider certificates of conformity in respect of new vehicles to be no longer valid for the purposes of Article 26 of Directive 2007/46/EC, and prohibit the registration, sale and entry into service of such vehicles, where such vehicles do not comply with the requirements set out in Annexes II and III, including the approval level 2 requirements in Annex II and the pass/fail criteria set out in Appendix 2 to that Annex.

5.   Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 to 4, national authorities may not, on grounds relating to the AEBS:

| (a) | refuse to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval for a new type of vehicle where that vehicle complies with Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 and this Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

refuse to grant EC type-approval or national type-approval for a new type of vehicle where that vehicle complies with Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 and this Regulation;

| (b) | prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of a new vehicle where that vehicle complies with Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 and this Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of a new vehicle where that vehicle complies with Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 and this Regulation;

| (c) | grant EC type-approval or national type-approval according to approval level 2 for a new type of vehicle of category M2 and of category N2 with a maximum mass not exceeding 8 tonnes, until the pass/fail values for the warning and activation test requirements have been specified in accordance with Article 5. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

grant EC type-approval or national type-approval according to approval level 2 for a new type of vehicle of category M2 and of category N2 with a maximum mass not exceeding 8 tonnes, until the pass/fail values for the warning and activation test requirements have been specified in accordance with Article 5.

Article 4

EC type-approval of a type of vehicle with regard to AEBS

1.   The manufacturer or the manufacturer’s representative shall submit to the approval authority the application for EC type-approval of a type of vehicle with regard to AEBS.

2.   The application shall be drawn up in accordance with the model of the information document set out in Part 1 of Annex I.

3.   If the relevant requirements set out in Annex II to this Regulation are met, the approval authority shall grant an EC type-approval and issue a type-approval number in accordance with the numbering system set out in Annex VII to Directive 2007/46/EC.

An approval authority may not assign the same number to another type of vehicle.

4.   For the purposes of paragraph 3, the approval authority shall deliver an EC type-approval certificate established in accordance with the model set out in Part 2 of Annex I.

Article 5

Amendment to Appendix 2 of Annex II

By 31 December 2014 the Commission shall amend Appendix 2 of Annex II in order to include the pass/fail values for the warning and activation test requirements which types of vehicles of category M2 and of category N2 with a maximum mass not exceeding 8 tonnes will have to comply with for approval level 2.

2

2

Article 6

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 April 2012.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 200, 31.7.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 263, 9.10.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX I

Standard information document and EC type-approval certificate for the type-approval of motor vehicles with regard to AEBS

PART 1

Information document

MODEL

Information document No ... relating to the EC type-approval of a type of vehicle with regard to advanced emergency braking systems (AEBS).

The following information shall be supplied in triplicate and include a list of contents. Any drawings shall be supplied in appropriate scale and in sufficient detail on size A4 or on a folder of A4 format. Photographs, if any, shall show sufficient detail.

If the systems, components or separate technical units referred to in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 347/2012 have electronic controls, information concerning their performance shall be supplied.

0.   GENERAL

0.1.   Make (trade name of manufacturer): ...

0.2.   Type: ...

0.2.0.1.   Chassis: ...

0.2.0.2.   Bodywork/complete vehicle: ...

0.2.1.   Commercial name(s) (if available): ...

0.3.   Means of identification of type, if marked on the vehicle (b): ...

0.3.0.1.   Chassis: ...

0.3.0.2.   Bodywork/complete vehicle: ...

0.3.1.   Location of that marking: ...

0.3.1.1.   Chassis: ...

0.3.1.2.   Bodywork/complete vehicle: ...

0.4.   Category of vehicle (c): ...

0.5.   Name and address of manufacturer: ...

0.6.   Location and method of attachment of statutory plates and location of vehicle identification number: ...

0.6.1.   On the chassis: ...

0.6.2.   On the bodywork: ...

0.8.   Name(s) and address(es) of assembly plant(s)

0.9.   Name and address of the manufacturer’s representative (if any): ...

1.   GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VEHICLE

1.1.   Photographs and/or drawings of a representative vehicle: ...

1.2.   Dimensional drawing of the whole vehicle: ...

1.3.   Number of axles and wheels: ...

1.3.1.   Number and position of axles with twin wheels: ...

1.3.2.   Number and position of steered axles: ...

1.3.3.   Powered axles (number, position, interconnection): ...

2.   MASSES AND DIMENSIONS (f) (g)

(in kg and mm) (Refer to drawing where applicable)

2.1.   Wheelbase(s) (fully loaded) (1)

2.1.1.   Two axle vehicles: ...

2.1.1.1.   Vehicles with three or more axles

2.3.   Axle track(s) and width(s)

2.3.1.   Track of each steered axle (2): ...

2.3.2.   Track of all other axles (2): ...

2.3.4.   Width of the foremost axle (measured at the outermost part of the tyres excluding the bulging of the tyres close to the ground): ...

2.4.   Range of vehicle dimensions (overall)

2.4.1.   For chassis without bodywork

2.4.1.1.   Length (3): ...

2.4.1.1.1.   Maximum permissible length: ...

2.4.1.1.2.   Minimum permissible length: ...

2.4.1.2.   Width (4): ...

2.4.1.2.1.   Maximum permissible width: ...

2.4.1.2.2.   Minimum permissible width: ...

2.4.2.   For chassis with bodywork

2.4.2.1.   Length (3): ...

2.4.2.1.1.   Length of the loading area: ...

2.4.2.2.   Width (4): ...

2.4.3.   For bodywork approved without chassis (vehicles M2 and M3)

2.4.3.1.   Length (3): ...

2.4.3.2.   Width (4): ...

2.6.   Mass in running order

Mass of the vehicle with bodywork and, in the case of a towing vehicle of category other than M1, with coupling device, if fitted by the manufacturer, in running order, or mass of the chassis or chassis with cab, without bodywork and/or coupling device if the manufacturer does not fit the bodywork and/or coupling device (including liquids, tools, spare wheel, if fitted, and driver and, for buses and coaches, a crew member if there is a crew seat in the vehicle) (h) (maximum and minimum for each variant): ...

4.7.   Maximum vehicle design speed (in km/h) (q): ...

8.   BRAKES

(The following particulars, including means of identification, where applicable, are to be given)

8.1.   Type and characteristics of the brakes as defined in point 1.6 of Annex I to Council Directive 71/320/EEC (1) including details and drawings of the drums, discs, hoses make and type of shoe/pad assemblies and/or linings, effective braking areas, radius of drums, shoes or discs, mass of drums, adjustment devices, relevant parts of the axle(s) and suspension: ...

8.2.   Operating diagram, description and/or drawing of the braking system described in point 1.2 of Annex I to Directive 71/320/EEC including details and drawings of the transmission and controls: ...

8.2.1.   Service braking system: ...

8.2.2.   Secondary braking system: ...

8.2.4.   Any additional braking system: ...

8.3.   Control and transmission of trailer braking systems in vehicles designed to tow a trailer: ......

8.4.   Vehicle is equipped to tow a trailer with electric/pneumatic/hydraulic (*1) service brakes: yes/no (*1)

8.5.   Anti-lock braking system

8.5.1.   description of system operation (including any electronic parts), electric block diagram, hydraulic or pneumatic circuit plan: ...

8.6.   Calculation and curves according to the Appendix to point 1.1.4.2 of the Appendix to Annex II to Directive 71/320/EEC or to the Appendix to Annex XI thereto, if applicable: ...

8.7.   Description and/or drawing of the energy supply, also to be specified for power-assisted braking systems: ...

8.7.1.   In the case of compressed-air braking systems, working pressure p2 in the pressure reservoir(s): ......

8.7.2.   In the case of vacuum braking systems, the initial energy level in the reservoir(s): ...

13.   SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR BUSES AND COACHES

13.1.   Class of vehicle: Class III/Class B (*1)

Explanatory notes

PART 2

MODEL

(maximum format: A4 (210 × 297 mm))

EC TYPE-APPROVAL CERTIFICATE

Communication concerning:

| — | EC type-approval (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

EC type-approval (2)

2

| — | Extension of EC type-approval (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

Extension of EC type-approval (2)

2

| — | Refusal of EC type-approval (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

Refusal of EC type-approval (2)

2

| — | Withdrawal of EC type-approval (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

Withdrawal of EC type-approval (2)

2

of a type of vehicle with regard to advanced emergency braking systems (AEBS)

with regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 347/2012 as amended and complying with approval level 1 (2)/approval level 2 (2)

2

2

EC type-approval Number: _

Reason for extension:

SECTION I

SECTION I

0.1.   Make (trade name of manufacturer):

0.2.   Type:

0.2.1.   Commercial name(s) (if available)

0.3.   Means of identification of type if marked on the vehicle (3)

3

0.3.1.   Location of that marking:

0.4.   Category of vehicle (4):

4

0.5.   Name and address of manufacturer:

0.8.   Names and address(es) of assembly plant(s):

0.9.   Representative of the manufacturer

SECTION II

SECTION II

1.   Additional information (where applicable): See Addendum

2.   Technical service responsible for carrying out the tests:

3.   Date of test report:

4.   Number of test report:

5.   Remarks (if any): See Addendum

6.   Place:

7.   Date:

8.   Signature:

| Attachments | : | Information package.
  Test report. |
| --- | --- | --- |

Attachments

:

Information package.

Test report.

---

(b)  If the means of identification of type contains characters not relevant to describe the vehicle, component or separate technical unit types covered by this information document, such characters shall be represented in the documentation by the symbol ‘?’ (e.g. ABC??123??).

b

(c)  Classified according to the definitions set out in Part A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 263, 9.10.2007, p. 1).

c

(f)  Where there is one version with a normal cab and another with a sleeper cab, both sets of masses and dimensions are to be stated.

f

(g)  Standard ISO 612: 1978 — Road vehicles — Dimensions of motor vehicles and towed vehicles — terms and definitions.

g

(1)

1

| (g1) | Motor vehicle and drawbar trailer: term No 6.4.1.
  Semi-trailer and centre-axle trailer: term No 6.4.2.

  Note

  In the case of a centre-axle trailer, the axis of the coupling shall be considered as the foremost axle. |
| --- | --- |

(g1)

g1

Motor vehicle and drawbar trailer: term No 6.4.1.

Semi-trailer and centre-axle trailer: term No 6.4.2.

Note

Note

In the case of a centre-axle trailer, the axis of the coupling shall be considered as the foremost axle.

(2)

2

| (g4) | Term No 6.5. |
| --- | --- |

(g4)

g4

Term No 6.5.

(3)

3

| (g5) | Term No 6.1 and for vehicles other than those of category M1: point 2.4.1 of Annex I to Directive 97/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 233, 25.8.1997, p. 1).
  In the case of trailers, the lengths shall be specified as mentioned in term No 6.1.2 of Standard ISO 612: 1978. |
| --- | --- |

(g5)

g5

Term No 6.1 and for vehicles other than those of category M1

In the case of trailers, the lengths shall be specified as mentioned in term No 6.1.2 of Standard ISO 612: 1978.

(4)

4

| (g7) | Term No 6.2 and for vehicles other than those of category M1: point 2.4.2 of Annex I to Directive 97/27/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(g7)

g7

Term No 6.2 and for vehicles other than those of category M1

(h)  The mass of the driver and, if applicable, of the crew member is assessed at 75 kg (subdivided into 68 kg occupant mass and 7 kg luggage mass according to ISO Standard 2416: 1992), the fuel tank is filled to 90 % and the other liquid containing systems (except those for used water) to 100 % of the capacity specified by the manufacturer.

h

(q)  With respect to trailers, maximum speed permitted by the manufacturer.

q

(1)  
  OJ L 202, 6.9.1971, p. 37.

1

(*1)  Delete where not applicable (there are cases where nothing needs to be deleted when more than one entry is applicable).

*1

(2)  Delete where not applicable.

2

(3)  If the means of identification of type contains characters not relevant to describe the vehicle, component or separate technical unit types covered by this information, such characters shall be represented in the documentation by the symbol ‘?’ (e.g. ABC??123??).

3

(4)  As defined in Section A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC.

4

Addendum

to EC type-approval certificate No ...

1.   Additional information

1.1.   Brief description of the advanced emergency braking system (AEBS) fitted to the vehicle:

4.   Test results according to Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 347/2012

4.1.   Details that enable to identify and reproduce the targets used for the testing

4.2.   List of positive actions resulting in the interruption of the collision warning phase

4.3.   List of positive actions resulting in the interruption of the emergency braking phase

4.4.   Description of the warning indication and the sequence in which the collision warning signals are presented to the driver

4.5.   Mass and condition of load of the vehicle when tested

4.6.   Details which enable the test targets to be specifically identified

4.7.   Result of the warning and activation test with a stationary target

4.8.   Results of the warning and activation test with a moving target

4.9.   Results of the failure detection test

4.10.   Results of the deactivation test (only if the vehicle is equipped with means to deactivate the emergency braking system)

4.11.   Results of the false reaction test

4.12.   The type of vehicle with its advanced emergency braking system (AEBS) complies with the approval level 1 requirements set out in Appendix 1 to Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 347/2012: yes/no (1)

4.13.   The type of vehicle with its advanced emergency braking system (AEBS) complies with the approval level 2 requirements in Appendix 2 to Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 347/2012: yes/no (1)

5.   Remarks (if any):

---

(1)  Delete where not applicable.

---

ANNEX II

Requirements and tests for the type-approval of motor vehicles with regard to AEBS

1.   Requirements

1.1.   General requirements

1.1.1.   Any vehicle covered by the scope of this Regulation shall, with regard to the AEBS fitted, meet the performance requirements set out in points 1.1 to 1.6.2 of this Annex and shall be equipped with an anti-lock braking function in accordance with the performance requirements of Annex 13 of UNECE Regulation No 13 (1).

1.1.2.   The effectiveness of the AEBS shall not be adversely affected by magnetic or electrical fields. This shall be demonstrated by compliance with UNECE Regulation No 10, 03 series of amendments.

1.1.3.   Conformity with the safety aspects of complex electronic control systems shall be demonstrated by meeting the requirements of Annex III.

1.2.   Performance requirements

1.2.1.   The system shall provide the driver with appropriate warnings as described in points 1.2.1.1 to 1.2.1.3:

| 1.2.1.1. | A collision warning when the AEBS has detected the possibility of a collision with a preceding vehicle of category M, N or O in the same lane which is travelling at a slower speed, has slowed to a halt or is stationary having not being identified as moving. The warning shall be as specified in point 1.5.1. |
| --- | --- |

1.2.1.1.

A collision warning when the AEBS has detected the possibility of a collision with a preceding vehicle of category M, N or O in the same lane which is travelling at a slower speed, has slowed to a halt or is stationary having not being identified as moving. The warning shall be as specified in point 1.5.1.

| 1.2.1.2. | A failure warning when there is a failure in the AEBS that prevents the requirements of this Annex being met. The warning shall be as specified in point 1.5.4.






  1.2.1.2.1. | There shall not be an appreciable time interval between each self-check by the AEBS, and subsequently there shall not be an appreciable delay in illuminating the warning signal, in the case of an electrically detectable failure. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.2.1.2.

A failure warning when there is a failure in the AEBS that prevents the requirements of this Annex being met. The warning shall be as specified in point 1.5.4.

1.2.1.2.1.

There shall not be an appreciable time interval between each self-check by the AEBS, and subsequently there shall not be an appreciable delay in illuminating the warning signal, in the case of an electrically detectable failure.

| 1.2.1.3. | A deactivation warning, if the vehicle is equipped with a means to manually deactivate the AEBS, shall be given when the system is deactivated. This shall be as specified in point 1.4.2. |
| --- | --- |

1.2.1.3.

A deactivation warning, if the vehicle is equipped with a means to manually deactivate the AEBS, shall be given when the system is deactivated. This shall be as specified in point 1.4.2.

1.2.2.   Subsequent to the warning(s) referred to in point 1.2.1.1, and subject to the provisions of points 1.3.1, 1.3.2 and 1.3.3, there shall be an emergency braking phase having the purpose of significantly decreasing the speed of the subject vehicle. This shall be tested in accordance with points 2.4 and 2.5.

1.2.3.   The AEBS shall be active at least within the vehicle speed range of 15 km/h up to the maximum design speed of the vehicle, and at all vehicle load, unless manually deactivated in accordance with point 1.4.

1.2.4.   The AEBS shall be designed to minimise the generation of collision warning signals and to avoid autonomous braking in situations where the driver would not recognise an impending forward collision. This shall be demonstrated in accordance with point 2.8.

1.3.   Interruption by the driver

1.3.1.   The AEBS may provide the means for the driver to interrupt the collision warning phase. However, when a vehicle braking system is used to provide a haptic warning, the system shall provide the driver with a means to interrupt the warning braking.

1.3.2.   The AEBS shall provide the means for the driver to interrupt the emergency braking phase.

1.3.3.   In the cases referred to in points 1.3.1 and 1.3.2, the interruption may be initiated by any positive action (e.g. kick-down, operating the direction indicator control) that indicates that the driver is aware of the emergency situation. The vehicle manufacturer shall provide a list of these positive actions to the technical service at the time of type-approval and it shall be annexed to the test report referred to in Section II of Part 2 of Annex I.

1.4.   When a vehicle is equipped with a means to deactivate the AEBS function, the following conditions shall apply as appropriate:

| 1.4.1. | The AEBS function shall be automatically reinstated at the initiation of each new ignition cycle. |
| --- | --- |

1.4.1.

The AEBS function shall be automatically reinstated at the initiation of each new ignition cycle.

| 1.4.2. | A constant optical warning signal shall inform the driver that the AEBS function has been deactivated. The yellow warning signal specified in point 1.5.4 may be used for this purpose. |
| --- | --- |

1.4.2.

A constant optical warning signal shall inform the driver that the AEBS function has been deactivated. The yellow warning signal specified in point 1.5.4 may be used for this purpose.

1.5.   Warning indication

1.5.1.   The collision warning referred to in point 1.2.1.1 shall be provided by at least two modes selected from acoustic, haptic or optical.

The timing of the warning signals shall be such that they provide the possibility for the driver to react to the risk of collision and take control of the situation, and shall also avoid nuisance for the driver by too early or too frequent warnings. This shall be tested in accordance with points 2.4.2 and 2.5.2.

1.5.2.   A description of the warning indication and the sequence in which the collision warning signals are presented to the driver shall be provided by the vehicle manufacturer at the time of type-approval and recorded in the test report.

1.5.3.   Where an optical means is used as part of the collision warning, the optical signal may be the flashing of the failure warning signal specified in point 1.2.1.2.

1.5.4.   The failure warning referred to in point 1.2.1.2 shall be a constant yellow optical warning signal.

1.5.5.   Each AEBS optical warning signal shall be activated either when the ignition (start) switch is turned to the ‘on’ (run) position or when the ignition (start) switch is in a position between the ‘on’ (run) and ‘start’ that is designated by the manufacturer as a check position (initial system (power-on)). This requirement does not apply to warning signals shown in a common space.

1.5.6.   The optical warning signals shall be visible even by daylight; the satisfactory condition of the signals must be easily verifiable by the driver from the driver’s seat.

1.5.7.   When the driver is provided with an optical warning signal to indicate that the AEBS is temporarily not available, for example due to inclement weather conditions, the signal shall be constant and yellow in colour. The failure warning signal specified in point 1.5.4 may be used for this purpose.

1.6.   Provisions for the periodic technical inspection

1.6.1.   At a periodic technical inspection it shall be possible to confirm the correct operational status of the AEBS by a visible observation of the failure warning signal status, following a ‘power-ON’ and any bulb check.

In the case of the failure warning signal being in a common space, the common space must be observed to be functional prior to the failure warning signal status check.

1.6.2.   At the time of type-approval, the means to protect against simple unauthorised modification of the operation of the failure warning signal chosen by the manufacturer shall be confidentially outlined.

Alternatively, this protection requirement is fulfilled when a secondary means of checking the correct operational status of the AEBS is available.

2.   Test procedures

2.1.   Test conditions

2.1.1.   The test shall be performed on a flat, dry concrete or asphalt surface affording good adhesion.

2.1.2.   The ambient temperature shall be between 0 °C and 45 °C.

2.1.3.   The horizontal visibility range shall allow the target to be observed throughout the test.

2.1.4.   The tests shall be performed when there is no wind liable to affect the results.

2.2.   Vehicle conditions

2.2.1.   Test weight

The vehicle shall be tested in a condition of load to be agreed between the manufacturer and the Technical Service. No alteration shall be made once the test procedure has begun.

2.3.   Test targets

2.3.1.   The target used for the tests shall be a regular high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon, or alternatively a ‘soft target’ representative of such a vehicle in terms of its identification characteristics applicable to the sensor system of the AEBS under test (2).

2.3.2.   Details that enable the target(s) to be specifically identified and reproduced shall be recorded in the vehicle type-approval documentation, as referred to in point 4.6 of the Addendum to Section II of Part 2 of Annex I.

2.4.   Warning and activation test with a stationary target

2.4.1.   The subject vehicle shall approach the stationary target in a straight line for at least two seconds prior to the functional part of the test with a subject vehicle to target centreline offset of not more than 0,5 m.

The functional part of the test shall start when the subject vehicle is travelling at a speed of 80 ± 2 km/h and is at a distance of at least 120 m from the target.

From the start of the functional part until the point of collision there shall be no adjustment to any control of the subject vehicle by the driver other than slight adjustments to the steering control to counteract any drifting.

2.4.2.   The timing for the collision warning modes referred to in point 1.5.1 shall comply with the following:

| 2.4.2.1. | At least one haptic or acoustic warning mode shall be provided no later than the values specified in: | For approval level 1: Column B of the table in Appendix 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2.1.

At least one haptic or acoustic warning mode shall be provided no later than the values specified in:

For approval level 1: Column B of the table in Appendix 1

| | For approval level 2: Column B of the table in Appendix 2 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 2: Column B of the table in Appendix 2

These values are to be achieved before the start of the emergency braking phase.

| 2.4.2.2. | At least two warning modes shall be provided no later than the values specified in: | For approval level 1: Column C of the table in Appendix 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2.2.

At least two warning modes shall be provided no later than the values specified in:

For approval level 1: Column C of the table in Appendix 1

| | For approval level 2: Column C of the table in Appendix 2 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 2: Column C of the table in Appendix 2

These values are to be achieved before the start of the emergency braking phase.

| 2.4.2.3. | Any speed reduction during the warning phase shall not exceed either 15 km/h or 30 % of the total subject vehicle speed reduction, whichever is higher. |
| --- | --- |

2.4.2.3.

Any speed reduction during the warning phase shall not exceed either 15 km/h or 30 % of the total subject vehicle speed reduction, whichever is higher.

2.4.3.   The collision warning phase shall be followed by the emergency braking phase.

2.4.4.   The emergency braking phase shall not start before a TTC equal to or less than 3,0 seconds.

Compliance shall be verified by either actual measurement during the test or using documentation provided by the vehicle manufacturer, as agreed between the Technical Service and the vehicle manufacturer.

2.4.5.   The total speed reduction of the subject vehicle at the time of the impact with the stationary target shall be not less than the value specified in:

| | For approval level 1: Column D of the table in Appendix 1 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 1: Column D of the table in Appendix 1

| | For approval level 2: Column D of the table in Appendix 2 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 2: Column D of the table in Appendix 2

2.5.   Warning and activation test with a moving target

2.5.1.   The subject vehicle and the moving target shall travel in a straight line, in the same direction, for at least two seconds prior to the functional part of the test, with a subject vehicle to target centreline offset of not more than 0,5 m.

The functional part of the test shall start with the subject vehicle travelling at a speed of 80 ± 2 km/h, and the moving target at a speed of the value specified in:

| | For approval level 1: Column H of the table in Appendix 1 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 1: Column H of the table in Appendix 1

| | For approval level 2: Column H of the table in Appendix 2 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 2: Column H of the table in Appendix 2

The separation distance between the subject vehicle and the moving target shall be at least 120 m.

From the start of the functional part of the test until the subject vehicle comes to a speed equal to that of the target there shall be no adjustment to any subject vehicle control by the driver other than slight steering adjustments to counteract any drifting.

2.5.2.   The timing for the collision warning modes referred to in point 1.5.1 shall comply with the following:

| 2.5.2.1. | At least one haptic or acoustic warning mode shall be provided no later than the value specified in: | For approval level 1: Column E of the table in Appendix 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2.1.

At least one haptic or acoustic warning mode shall be provided no later than the value specified in:

For approval level 1: Column E of the table in Appendix 1

| | For approval level 2: Column E of the table in Appendix 2 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 2: Column E of the table in Appendix 2

These values are to be achieved before the start of the emergency braking phase.

| 2.5.2.2. | At least two warning modes shall be provided no later than the value specified in: | For approval level 1: Column F of the table in Appendix 1 |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2.2.

At least two warning modes shall be provided no later than the value specified in:

For approval level 1: Column F of the table in Appendix 1

| | For approval level 2: Column F of the table in Appendix 2 |
| --- | --- |

For approval level 2: Column F of the table in Appendix 2

These values are to be achieved before the start of the emergency braking phase.

| 2.5.2.3. | Any speed reduction during the warning phase shall not exceed either 15 km/h or 30 % of the total subject vehicle speed reduction, whichever is higher. |
| --- | --- |

2.5.2.3.

Any speed reduction during the warning phase shall not exceed either 15 km/h or 30 % of the total subject vehicle speed reduction, whichever is higher.

2.5.3.   The collision warning phase shall be followed by the emergency braking phase, which shall result in the subject vehicle not impacting the moving target.

2.5.4.   The emergency braking phase shall not start before a TTC equal to or less than 3,0 seconds.

Compliance shall be verified by either actual measurement during the test or using documentation provided by the vehicle manufacturer, as agreed between the Technical Service and the vehicle manufacturer.

2.6.   Failure detection test

2.6.1.   Simulate an electrical failure, for example by disconnecting the power source to any AEBS component or disconnecting any electrical connection between AEBS components. When simulating an AEBS failure, neither the electrical connections for the driver warning signal referred to in point 1.5.4 nor the optional manual AEBS deactivation control referred to in point 1.4 shall be disconnected.

2.6.2.   The failure warning signal referred to in point 1.5.4 shall be activated and remain activated not later than 10 seconds after the vehicle has been driven at a speed greater than 15 km/h and be reactivated immediately after a subsequent ignition ‘off’ ignition ‘on’ cycle with the vehicle stationary as long as the simulated failure exists.

2.7.   Deactivation test

2.7.1.   For vehicles equipped with means to deactivate the AEBS, turn the ignition (start) switch to the ‘on’ (run) position and deactivate the AEBS. The warning signal referred to in point 1.4.2 shall be activated. Turn the ignition (start) switch to the ‘off’ position. Again, turn the ignition (start) switch to the ‘on’ (run) position and verify that the previously activated warning signal is not reactivated, thereby indicating that the AEBS has been reinstated as specified in point 1.4.1. If the ignition system is activated by means of a ‘key’, that requirement shall be fulfilled without removing the key.

2.8.   False reaction test

2.8.1.   Two stationary vehicles, of category M1 AA saloon, shall be positioned:

| (a) | so as to face in the same direction of travel as the subject vehicle; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

so as to face in the same direction of travel as the subject vehicle;

| (b) | with a distance of 4,5 m between them (3); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

with a distance of 4,5 m between them (3);

| (c) | with the rear of each vehicle aligned with the other. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

with the rear of each vehicle aligned with the other.

2.8.2.   The subject vehicle shall travel for a distance of at least 60 m, at a constant speed of 50 ± 2 km/h to pass centrally between the two stationary vehicles.

During the test there shall be no adjustment of any subject vehicle control other than slight steering adjustments to counteract any drifting.

2.8.3.   The AEBS shall not provide a collision warning and shall not initiate the emergency braking phase.

---

(1)  The Union acceded to that UNECE Regulation by Council Decision 97/836/EC (OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78).

(2)  The identification characteristics of the soft target shall be agreed upon between the Technical Service and the vehicle manufacturer as being equivalent to a passenger car of category M1 AA saloon.

(3)  The point of reference of each stationary vehicle for establishing the distance between the two stationary vehicles, shall be determined in accordance with ISO 612: 1978.

Appendix 1

Approval level 1: warning and activation test requirements — pass/fail values

| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vehicle category | Stationary target | Moving target |
| Timing of warning modes | Speed reduction of subject vehicle | Timing of warning modes | Speed reduction of subject vehicle | Target speed |
| At least 1 haptic or acoustic | At least 2 | At least 1 haptic or acoustic | At least 2 |
| (ref. point 2.4.2.1) | (ref. point 2.4.2.2) | (ref. point 2.4.5) | (ref. point 2.5.2.1) | (ref. point 2.5.2.2) | (ref. point 2.5.3) | (ref. point 2.5.1) |
| M3, N3 and N2 > 8 t (equipped with pneumatic or air over hydraulic braking systems and with pneumatic rear axle suspension systems) | Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase | Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase | Not less than 10 km/h | Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase | Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase | Subject vehicle shall not impact with the moving target | 32 ± 2 km/h |

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Vehicle category

Stationary target

Moving target

Timing of warning modes

Speed reduction of subject vehicle

Timing of warning modes

Speed reduction of subject vehicle

Target speed

At least 1 haptic or acoustic

At least 2

At least 1 haptic or acoustic

At least 2

(ref. point 2.4.2.1)

(ref. point 2.4.2.2)

(ref. point 2.4.5)

(ref. point 2.5.2.1)

(ref. point 2.5.2.2)

(ref. point 2.5.3)

(ref. point 2.5.1)

M3, N3 and N2 > 8 t (equipped with pneumatic or air over hydraulic braking systems and with pneumatic rear axle suspension systems)

Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase

Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase

Not less than 10 km/h

Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase

Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase

Subject vehicle shall not impact with the moving target

32 ± 2 km/h

Appendix 2

Approval level 2: warning and activation test requirements — pass/fail values

| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vehicle category | Stationary target | Moving target |
| Timing of warning modes | Speed reduction of subject vehicle | Timing of warning modes | Speed reduction of subject vehicle | Target speed |
| At least 1 haptic or acoustic | At least 2 | At least 1 haptic or acoustic | At least 2 |
| (ref. point 2.4.2.1) | (ref. point 2.4.2.2) | (ref. point 2.4.5) | (ref. point 2.5.2.1) | (ref. point 2.5.2.2) | (ref. point 2.5.3) | (ref. point 2.5.1) |
| M3, N3 and N2 > 8 t (1) | Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase | Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase | Not less than 20 km/h | Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase | Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase | Subject vehicle shall not impact with the moving target | 12 ± 2 km/h |
| N2 ≤ 8 t and M2
   (2) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) |

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Vehicle category

Stationary target

Moving target

Timing of warning modes

Speed reduction of subject vehicle

Timing of warning modes

Speed reduction of subject vehicle

Target speed

At least 1 haptic or acoustic

At least 2

At least 1 haptic or acoustic

At least 2

(ref. point 2.4.2.1)

(ref. point 2.4.2.2)

(ref. point 2.4.5)

(ref. point 2.5.2.1)

(ref. point 2.5.2.2)

(ref. point 2.5.3)

(ref. point 2.5.1)

M3, N3 and N2 > 8 t (1)

Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase

Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase

Not less than 20 km/h

Not later than 1,4 s before start of emergency braking phase

Not later than 0,8 s before start of emergency braking phase

Subject vehicle shall not impact with the moving target

12 ± 2 km/h

N2 ≤ 8 t and M2
   (2)

(3)

(3)

(3)

(3)

(3)

(3)

(3)

---

(1)  Vehicles of category M3 with hydraulic braking system are subject to the requirements of the second row.

(2)  Vehicles with pneumatic braking system are subject to the requirements of the first row.

(3)  Values to be specified in accordance with Article 5.

---

ANNEX III

Special requirements to be applied to the safety aspects of complex electronic vehicle control systems

1.   General

This Annex defines the special requirements for documentation, fault strategy and verification with respect to the safety aspects of complex electronic vehicle control systems for the purposes of this Regulation.

This Annex may also be applied for safety related functions which are controlled by electronic system(s).

This Annex does not specify the performance criteria for complex electronic vehicles control systems but covers the methodology applied to the design process and the information which must be disclosed to the technical service for type-approval purposes.

That information shall show that a complex electronic vehicle control system respects, under normal and fault conditions, all the appropriate performance requirements set out in this Regulation.

2.   Definitions

For the purposes of this Annex, the following definitions shall apply:

| 2.1. | ‘Safety concept’ means a description of the measures designed into the system, for example within the electronic units, so as to address system integrity and thereby ensure safe operation even in the event of an electrical failure.
  The possibility of a fall-back to partial operation or even to a back-up system for vital vehicle functions may be a part of the safety concept. |
| --- | --- |

2.1.

‘Safety concept’ means a description of the measures designed into the system, for example within the electronic units, so as to address system integrity and thereby ensure safe operation even in the event of an electrical failure.

The possibility of a fall-back to partial operation or even to a back-up system for vital vehicle functions may be a part of the safety concept.

| 2.2. | ‘Electronic control system’ means a combination of units, designed to co-operate in the production of the stated vehicle control function by electronic data processing.
  Such systems, often controlled by software, are built from discrete functional components such as sensors, electronic control units and actuators and connected by transmission links. They may include mechanical, electro-pneumatic or electro-hydraulic elements. |
| --- | --- |

2.2.

‘Electronic control system’ means a combination of units, designed to co-operate in the production of the stated vehicle control function by electronic data processing.

Such systems, often controlled by software, are built from discrete functional components such as sensors, electronic control units and actuators and connected by transmission links. They may include mechanical, electro-pneumatic or electro-hydraulic elements.

| 2.3. | ‘Complex electronic vehicle control systems’ mean those electronic control systems which are subject to a hierarchy of control in which a controlled function may be over-ridden by a higher level electronic control system/function. |
| --- | --- |

2.3.

‘Complex electronic vehicle control systems’ mean those electronic control systems which are subject to a hierarchy of control in which a controlled function may be over-ridden by a higher level electronic control system/function.

| 2.4. | ‘Higher-level control systems/functions’ mean those systems/functions which employ additional processing and/or sensing provisions to modify vehicle behaviour by commanding variations in the normal function(s) of the vehicle control system.
  This allows complex systems to automatically change their objectives with a priority which depends on the sensed circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

2.4.

‘Higher-level control systems/functions’ mean those systems/functions which employ additional processing and/or sensing provisions to modify vehicle behaviour by commanding variations in the normal function(s) of the vehicle control system.

This allows complex systems to automatically change their objectives with a priority which depends on the sensed circumstances.

| 2.5. | ‘Units’ mean the smallest divisions of system components covered by this Annex: those combinations of components will be treated as single entities for purposes of identification, analysis or replacement. |
| --- | --- |

2.5.

‘Units’ mean the smallest divisions of system components covered by this Annex: those combinations of components will be treated as single entities for purposes of identification, analysis or replacement.

| 2.6. | ‘Transmission links’ mean the means used for inter-connecting distributed units for the purpose of conveying signals, operating data or an energy supply.
  This equipment is generally electrical but may, in some part, be mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic or optical. |
| --- | --- |

2.6.

‘Transmission links’ mean the means used for inter-connecting distributed units for the purpose of conveying signals, operating data or an energy supply.

This equipment is generally electrical but may, in some part, be mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic or optical.

| 2.7. | ‘Range of control’ means an output variable corresponding to the range over which the system is likely to exercise control. |
| --- | --- |

2.7.

‘Range of control’ means an output variable corresponding to the range over which the system is likely to exercise control.

| 2.8. | ‘Boundary of functional operation’ means the boundaries of the external physical limits within which the system is able to maintain control. |
| --- | --- |

2.8.

‘Boundary of functional operation’ means the boundaries of the external physical limits within which the system is able to maintain control.

3.   Documentation

3.1.   Requirements

The manufacturer shall provide a documentation package which gives access to the basic design of the complex electronic vehicle control system for which type-approval is applied (hereinafter referred to as ‘the System’) and the means by which it is linked to other vehicle systems or by which it directly controls output variables.

The function(s) of ‘the System’ and the safety concept, as laid down by the manufacturer, shall be explained.

Documentation shall be brief, yet provide evidence that the design and development has had the benefit of expertise from all the system fields which are involved.

For periodic technical inspections, the documentation shall describe how the current operational status of ‘the System’ can be checked.

3.1.1.   Documentation shall be made available in the following two parts:

| (a) | the formal documentation package for the approval, containing the material listed in Section 3 (with the exception of that of point 3.4.4) which shall be supplied to the technical service at the time of submission of the type-approval application. This will be taken as the basic reference for the verification process set out in point 4; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the formal documentation package for the approval, containing the material listed in Section 3 (with the exception of that of point 3.4.4) which shall be supplied to the technical service at the time of submission of the type-approval application. This will be taken as the basic reference for the verification process set out in point 4;

| (b) | additional material and analysis data referred to in point 3.4.4, which shall be retained by the manufacturer, but made open for inspection at the time of type-approval. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

additional material and analysis data referred to in point 3.4.4, which shall be retained by the manufacturer, but made open for inspection at the time of type-approval.

3.2.   Description of the functions of ‘the System’

A description shall be provided which gives a simple explanation of all the control functions of ‘the System’ and the methods employed to achieve the objectives, including a statement of the mechanism(s) by which control is exercised.

3.2.1.   A list of all input and sensed variables shall be provided and the working range of these defined.

3.2.2.   A list of all output variables which are controlled by ‘the System’ shall be provided and an indication given, in each case, of whether the control is direct or via another vehicle system. The range of control exercised on each such variable shall be defined.

3.2.3.   Limits defining the boundaries of functional operation shall be stated where appropriate to system performance.

3.3.   System layout and schematics

3.3.1.   Inventory of components

A list shall be provided, collating all the units of ‘the System’ and mentioning the other vehicle systems which are needed to achieve the control function in question.

An outline schematic showing those units in combination shall be provided with both the equipment distribution and the interconnections made clear.

3.3.2.   Functions of the units

The function of each unit of ‘the System’ shall be outlined and the signals linking it with other units or with other vehicle systems shall be shown. This may be provided by a labelled block diagram or other schematic, or by a description aided by such a diagram.

3.3.3.   Interconnections

Interconnections within ‘the System’ shall be shown by a circuit diagram for the electric transmission links, by an optical-fibre diagram for optical links, by a piping diagram for pneumatic or hydraulic transmission equipment and by a simplified diagrammatic layout for mechanical linkages.

3.3.4.   Signal flow and priorities

There shall be a clear correspondence between these transmission links and the signals carried between units.

Priorities of signals on multiplexed data paths shall be stated wherever priority may be an issue affecting performance or safety for the purpose of this Regulation.

3.3.5.   Identification of units

Each unit shall be clearly and unambiguously identifiable (e.g. by marking for hardware and marking or software output for software content) to provide corresponding hardware and documentation association.

Where functions are combined within a single unit or within a single computer, but shown in multiple blocks in the block diagram for clarity and ease of explanation, only a single hardware identification marking shall be used.

The manufacturer shall, by the use of this identification, affirm that the equipment supplied conforms to the corresponding document.

| 3.3.5.1. | The identification defines the hardware and software version and, where the latter changes such as to alter the function of the unit for the purpose of this Regulation, this identification shall also be changed. |
| --- | --- |

3.3.5.1.

3.4.   Safety concept of the manufacturer

3.4.1.   The manufacturer shall provide a statement which affirms that the strategy chosen to achieve ‘the System’ objectives will not, under non-fault conditions, prejudice the safe operation of systems which are subject to the provisions of this Regulation.

3.4.2.   In respect of software used in ‘the System’, the outline architecture shall be explained and the design methods and tools used shall be identified. The manufacturer shall be prepared, if required, to show evidence of the means by which the realisation of the system logic has been determined during the design and development process.

3.4.3.   The manufacturer shall provide the technical authorities with an explanation of the design provisions built into ‘the System’ so as to generate safe operation under fault conditions. Possible design provisions for failure in ‘the System’ are for example:

| (a) | fall-back to operation using a partial system; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

fall-back to operation using a partial system;

| (b) | change-over to a separate back-up system; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

change-over to a separate back-up system;

| (c) | removal of the high level function. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

removal of the high level function.

In case of a failure, the driver shall be warned for example by warning signal or message display. When the system is not deactivated by the driver, e.g. by turning the ignition (run) switch to ‘off’, or by switching off that particular function if a special switch is provided for that purpose, the warning shall be present as long as the fault condition persists.

| 3.4.3.1. | If the chosen provision selects a partial performance mode of operation under certain fault conditions, then those conditions shall be stated and the resulting limits of effectiveness defined. |
| --- | --- |

3.4.3.1.

| 3.4.3.2. | If the chosen provision selects a second (back-up) means to realise the vehicle control system objective, the principles of the change-over mechanism, the logic and level of redundancy and any built in back-up checking features shall be explained and the resulting limits of back-up effectiveness defined. |
| --- | --- |

3.4.3.2.

| 3.4.3.3. | If the chosen provision selects the removal of the higher level function, all the corresponding output control signals associated with this function shall be inhibited, and in such a manner as to limit the transition disturbance. |
| --- | --- |

3.4.3.3.

3.4.4.   The documentation shall be supported, by an analysis which shows, in overall terms, how the system will behave on the occurrence of any one of those specified faults which will have a bearing on vehicle control performance or safety.

This may be based on a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), a Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) or any similar process appropriate to system safety considerations.

The chosen analytical approach(es) shall be established and maintained by the manufacturer and shall be made open for inspection by the technical service at the time of the type-approval.

| 3.4.4.1. | This documentation shall itemise the parameters being monitored and shall set out, for each fault condition of the type referred to in point 3.4.4, the warning signal to be given to the driver and/or to service/technical inspection personnel. |
| --- | --- |

3.4.4.1.

4.   Verification and Test

4.1.   The functional operation of ‘the System’, as laid out in the documents required in point 3, shall be tested as follows:

4.1.1.   Verification of the function of ‘the System’

As the means of establishing the normal operational levels, verification of the performance of the vehicle system under non-fault conditions shall be conducted against the manufacturer’s basic benchmark specification unless this is subject to a specified performance test as part of the approval procedure set out in this Regulation.

4.1.2.   Verification of the safety concept referred to in point 3.4

The reaction of ‘the System’ shall, at the discretion of the approval authority, be checked under the influence of a failure in any individual unit by applying corresponding output signals to electrical units or mechanical elements in order to simulate the effects of internal faults within the unit.

The verification results shall correspond with the documented summary of the failure analysis, to a level of overall effect such that the safety concept and execution are confirmed as being adequate.

---

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 348/2012

of 20 April 2012

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

| (2) | The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 April 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 47,3 |
| TN | 124,7 |
| TR | 108,1 |
| ZZ | 93,4 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 139,2 |
| ZZ | 139,2 |
| 0709 93 10 | MA | 91,2 |
| TR | 108,3 |
| ZZ | 99,8 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 47,8 |
| IL | 72,9 |
| MA | 41,2 |
| TN | 54,8 |
| TR | 50,5 |
| ZZ | 53,4 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 58,3 |
| ZZ | 58,3 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 88,4 |
| BR | 83,6 |
| CA | 152,1 |
| CL | 99,1 |
| CN | 117,9 |
| MK | 29,3 |
| NZ | 122,4 |
| US | 164,3 |
| UY | 72,9 |
| ZA | 85,3 |
| ZZ | 101,5 |
| 0808 30 90 | AR | 109,5 |
| CL | 133,3 |
| CN | 65,6 |
| US | 107,0 |
| ZA | 125,0 |
| ZZ | 108,1 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

47,3

TN

124,7

TR

108,1

ZZ

93,4

0707 00 05

TR

139,2

ZZ

139,2

0709 93 10

MA

91,2

TR

108,3

ZZ

99,8

0805 10 20

EG

47,8

IL

72,9

MA

41,2

TN

54,8

TR

50,5

ZZ

53,4

0805 50 10

TR

58,3

ZZ

58,3

0808 10 80

AR

88,4

BR

83,6

CA

152,1

CL

99,1

CN

117,9

MK

29,3

NZ

122,4

US

164,3

UY

72,9

ZA

85,3

ZZ

101,5

0808 30 90

AR

109,5

CL

133,3

CN

65,6

US

107,0

ZA

125,0

ZZ

108,1

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---

DECISIONS

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/20

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 26 March 2012

amending Decision 98/213/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards internal partition kits

(notified under document C(2012) 1866)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2012/201/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (1), and in particular Article 13(4) thereof,

After consulting the Standing Committee on Construction,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 98/213/EC (2) only refers to products as defined in European technical approvals, while some of those products may also be covered by harmonised European standards. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 98/213/EC (2) only refers to products as defined in European technical approvals, while some of those products may also be covered by harmonised European standards.

| (2) | The European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) is currently preparing harmonised European standards for certain products referred to in Decision 98/213/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) is currently preparing harmonised European standards for certain products referred to in Decision 98/213/EC.

| (3) | Decision 98/213/EC should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 98/213/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 98/213/EC is amended as follows:

| (1) | the following Article 3a is inserted:

  ‘Article 3a
  The procedure for attesting conformity as set out in Annex IV shall be indicated in mandates for harmonised European standards.’; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

the following Article 3a is inserted:

‘Article 3a

The procedure for attesting conformity as set out in Annex IV shall be indicated in mandates for harmonised European standards.’;

| (2) | Annex IV is added, the text of which is set out in the Annex to this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IV is added, the text of which is set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2012.

For the Commission

Antonio TAJANI

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 80, 18.3.1998, p. 41.

2

---

ANNEX

‘ANNEX IV

PRODUCT FAMILY

GYPSUM BOARD PARTITION KITS (1/2)

Systems of attestation of conformity

For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) is requested to specify the following system of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised European standards:

| Product(s) | Intended use(s) | Level(s) or class(es) | Attestation of conformity system(s) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Internal partition kits/systems | For all uses not subject to reaction to fire requirements | any | 3 |
| System 3: | See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility. |

Product(s)

Intended use(s)

Level(s) or class(es)

Attestation of conformity system(s)

Internal partition kits/systems

For all uses not subject to reaction to fire requirements

any

3

System 3:

See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility.

The specification for the system must be such that it may be implemented even where it is not necessary to determine the performance for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement for that characteristic (see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, point 1.2.3 of the interpretative documents). In those cases, the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if it does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.

PRODUCT FAMILY

GYPSUM BOARD PARTITION KITS (2/2)

Systems of attestation of conformity

For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN is requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised European standard:

| Product(s) | Intended use(s) | Level(s) or class(es)
  (reaction to fire) | Attestation of conformity system(s) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Internal partition kits/systems | Uses subject to reaction to fire requirements | A1 (*1), A2 (*1), B (*1), C (*1) | 1 |
| A1 (*2), A2 (*2), B (*2), C (*2), D, E | 3 |
| (A1 to E) (*3), F | 4 |
| System 1: | See Annex III(2)(i) to Directive 89/106/EEC, without audit-testing of samples. |

Product(s)

Intended use(s)

Level(s) or class(es)

(reaction to fire)

Attestation of conformity system(s)

Internal partition kits/systems

Uses subject to reaction to fire requirements

A1 (*1), A2 (*1), B (*1), C (*1)

1

A1 (*2), A2 (*2), B (*2), C (*2), D, E

3

(A1 to E) (*3), F

4

System 1:

See Annex III(2)(i) to Directive 89/106/EEC, without audit-testing of samples.

| System 3: | See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility. |
| --- | --- |

System 3:

See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility.

| System 4: | See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility. |
| --- | --- |

System 4:

See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility.

The specification for the system must be such that it may be implemented even where it is not necessary to determine the performance for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement for that characteristic (see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, point 1.2.3 of the interpretative documents). In those cases, the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if it does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.’

---

(*1)  Products or materials for which a clearly identifiable stage in the production process results in an improvement of the reaction to fire classification (for example, the addition of fire retardants or the limitation of organic material).

*1

(*2)  Products or materials not covered by footnote (*1).

*2

*1

(*3)  Products or materials that are not required to be tested for reaction to fire (for example, products or materials of Class A1 in accordance with Commission Decision 96/603/EC (OJ L 267, 19.10.1996, p. 23)).

*3

---

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/22

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 29 March 2012

amending Decision 1999/94/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards precast normal/lightweight/autoclaved aerated concrete products

(notified under document C(2012) 1977)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2012/202/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (1), and in particular Article 13(4)(a) thereof,

After consulting the Standing Committee on Construction,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 January 1999, the Commission adopted Decision 1999/94/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards precast normal/lightweight/autoclaved aerated concrete products (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 January 1999, the Commission adopted Decision 1999/94/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards precast normal/lightweight/autoclaved aerated concrete products (2).

| (2) | Annex III to Decision 1999/94/EC should be amended in order to adapt the systems of attestation of conformity for beam/block floor units and elements incorporating organic material to technical progress in order to take into account uses subject to regulations on reaction to fire, as a different level of third party intervention should be ensured depending on the processes and materials used in production. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex III to Decision 1999/94/EC should be amended in order to adapt the systems of attestation of conformity for beam/block floor units and elements incorporating organic material to technical progress in order to take into account uses subject to regulations on reaction to fire, as a different level of third party intervention should be ensured depending on the processes and materials used in production.

| (3) | Decision 1999/94/EC should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 1999/94/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex III to Decision 1999/94/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2012.

For the Commission

Antonio TAJANI

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 29, 3.2.1999, p. 55.

2

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Decision 1999/94/EC, the following text is added:

‘PRODUCT FAMILY

BEAM/BLOCK FLOOR UNITS AND ELEMENTS INCORPORATING ORGANIC MATERIALS

Systems of attestation of conformity

For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) is requested to specify the following system of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised European standards:

| Product(s) | Intended use(s) | Level(s) or class(es)
  (Reaction to fire) | Attestation of conformity system(s) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Beam/block floor units and elements incorporating organic materials | For uses subject to regulations on reaction to fire | (A1, A2, B, C) (*1) | 1 |
| (A1, A2, B, C) (*2), D, E | 3 |
| (A1 to E) (*3), F | 4 |
| System 1: | See Annex III(2)(i) to Directive 89/106/EEC, without audit-testing of samples. |

Product(s)

Intended use(s)

Level(s) or class(es)

(Reaction to fire)

Attestation of conformity system(s)

Beam/block floor units and elements incorporating organic materials

For uses subject to regulations on reaction to fire

(A1, A2, B, C) (*1)

1

(A1, A2, B, C) (*2), D, E

3

(A1 to E) (*3), F

4

System 1:

See Annex III(2)(i) to Directive 89/106/EEC, without audit-testing of samples.

| System 3: | See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility. |
| --- | --- |

System 3:

See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility.

| System 4: | See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility. |
| --- | --- |

System 4:

See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility.

The specification for the system must be such that it may be implemented even where it is not necessary to determine the performance for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement for that characteristic (see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, point 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases, the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if it does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.’

---

(*1)  Products or materials for which a clearly identifiable stage in the production process results in an improvement of the reaction to fire classification (for example, the addition of fire retardants or the limitation of organic material).

*1

(*2)  Products or materials not covered by footnote (*1)

*2

*1

(*3)  Products or materials that are not required to be tested for reaction to fire (for example, products or materials of Class A1 in accordance with Commission Decision 96/603/EC (OJ L 267, 19.10.1996, p. 23)).

*3

---

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/24

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 19 April 2012

amending Annex I to Decision 2006/766/EC as regards the entry for Chile in the list of third countries from which imports of live, chilled, frozen or processed bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods for human consumption are permitted

(notified under document C(2012) 2446)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2012/203/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (1), and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 provides that products of animal origin are only to be imported from a third country or part of a third country that appears on a list drawn up in accordance with that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 provides that products of animal origin are only to be imported from a third country or part of a third country that appears on a list drawn up in accordance with that Regulation.

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 also provides that when drawing up and updating such lists, account is to be taken of Union controls in third countries and guarantees provided by the competent authorities of third countries, as regards compliance or equivalence with the Union feed and food law and animal health rules as specified in Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 also provides that when drawing up and updating such lists, account is to be taken of Union controls in third countries and guarantees provided by the competent authorities of third countries, as regards compliance or equivalence with the Union feed and food law and animal health rules as specified in Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (2).

| (3) | Commission Decision 2006/766/EC of 6 November 2006 establishing the lists of third countries and territories from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates, marine gastropods and fishery products are permitted (3) lists those third countries which satisfy the criteria referred to in Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 and are therefore able to guarantee that exports of those products to the Union meet the sanitary conditions laid down in Union legislation to protect the health of consumers. In particular, Annex I to that Decision sets out a list of third countries from which imports of live, chilled, frozen or processed bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods for human consumption are permitted. That list also indicates restrictions concerning such imports from certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Decision 2006/766/EC of 6 November 2006 establishing the lists of third countries and territories from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates, marine gastropods and fishery products are permitted (3) lists those third countries which satisfy the criteria referred to in Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 and are therefore able to guarantee that exports of those products to the Union meet the sanitary conditions laid down in Union legislation to protect the health of consumers. In particular, Annex I to that Decision sets out a list of third countries from which imports of live, chilled, frozen or processed bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods for human consumption are permitted. That list also indicates restrictions concerning such imports from certain third countries.

| (4) | Chile is currently included in the list in Annex I to Decision 2006/766/EC as a third country from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods intended for human consumption are permitted, but such imports are restricted to frozen or processed bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods and to certain chilled and eviscerated Pectinidae. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Chile is currently included in the list in Annex I to Decision 2006/766/EC as a third country from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods intended for human consumption are permitted, but such imports are restricted to frozen or processed bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods and to certain chilled and eviscerated Pectinidae.

| (5) | A Commission inspection was carried out in Chile from 26 April to 6 May 2010, to evaluate the control system in place governing the production of bivalve molluscs intended for export to the Union. The outcome of that inspection, together with the guarantees provided by the competent authority of Chile, indicate that the conditions applicable in that third country to live bivalve molluscs echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods intended for export to the Union are equivalent to those laid down in the relevant Union legislation. The restrictions to imports into the Union of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods from Chile should therefore no longer apply. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

A Commission inspection was carried out in Chile from 26 April to 6 May 2010, to evaluate the control system in place governing the production of bivalve molluscs intended for export to the Union. The outcome of that inspection, together with the guarantees provided by the competent authority of Chile, indicate that the conditions applicable in that third country to live bivalve molluscs echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods intended for export to the Union are equivalent to those laid down in the relevant Union legislation. The restrictions to imports into the Union of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods from Chile should therefore no longer apply.

| (6) | Decision 2006/766/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Decision 2006/766/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (7) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Annex I to Decision 2006/766/EC, the entry for Chile is replaced by the following:

| ‘CL | CHILE’ | |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘CL

CHILE’

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 2012.

For the Commission

John DALLI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 206.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 320, 18.11.2006, p. 53.

3

---

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/26

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 19 April 2012

amending the Annexes to Decision 2003/467/EC as regards the declaration of Latvia as officially brucellosis-free Member State and of certain regions of Italy, Poland and Portugal as officially tuberculosis-free, brucellosis-free and enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions

(notified under document C(2012) 2451)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2012/204/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (1), and in particular Annex A(I)(4), Annex A(II)(7) and Annex D(I)(E) thereto,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 64/432/EEC applies to trade within the Union in bovine animals and swine. It lays down the conditions whereby a Member State or region of a Member State may be declared officially tuberculosis-free, officially brucellosis-free and officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free as regards bovine herds. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 64/432/EEC applies to trade within the Union in bovine animals and swine. It lays down the conditions whereby a Member State or region of a Member State may be declared officially tuberculosis-free, officially brucellosis-free and officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free as regards bovine herds.

| (2) | The Annexes to Commission Decision 2003/467/EC of 23 June 2003 establishing the official tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status of certain Member States and regions of Member States as regards bovine herds (2) list the Member States and regions thereof which are declared respectively officially tuberculosis-free, officially brucellosis-free and officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Annexes to Commission Decision 2003/467/EC of 23 June 2003 establishing the official tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status of certain Member States and regions of Member States as regards bovine herds (2) list the Member States and regions thereof which are declared respectively officially tuberculosis-free, officially brucellosis-free and officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free.

| (3) | Italy has submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially tuberculosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for the provinces of Asti and Biella in the region of Piemonte in Italy. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Italy has submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially tuberculosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for the provinces of Asti and Biella in the region of Piemonte in Italy.

| (4) | In addition, the province of Ascoli Piceno is already listed in Chapter 2 of Annex I to Decision 2003/467/EC as an officially tuberculosis-free region of Italy. However, the administrative division of Italy splits the province of Ascoli Piceno in the region of Marche into two distinct provinces: the province of Ascoli Piceno and the province of Fermo. The entries for Italy in the list set out in Chapter 2 of Annex I to Decision 2003/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In addition, the province of Ascoli Piceno is already listed in Chapter 2 of Annex I to Decision 2003/467/EC as an officially tuberculosis-free region of Italy. However, the administrative division of Italy splits the province of Ascoli Piceno in the region of Marche into two distinct provinces: the province of Ascoli Piceno and the province of Fermo. The entries for Italy in the list set out in Chapter 2 of Annex I to Decision 2003/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (5) | Portugal has submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially tuberculosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve in Portugal. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Portugal has submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially tuberculosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve in Portugal.

| (6) | Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Italy and Portugal, the provinces of Asti and Biella in the region of Piemonte in Italy and all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve in Portugal should be declared as officially tuberculosis-free regions of Italy and Portugal respectively. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Italy and Portugal, the provinces of Asti and Biella in the region of Piemonte in Italy and all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve in Portugal should be declared as officially tuberculosis-free regions of Italy and Portugal respectively.

| (7) | Italy has also submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially brucellosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for all the provinces in the region of Valle d’Aosta in Italy. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Italy has also submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially brucellosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for all the provinces in the region of Valle d’Aosta in Italy.

| (8) | Latvia has also submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially brucellosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for its whole territory. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Latvia has also submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially brucellosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for its whole territory.

| (9) | Portugal has also submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially brucellosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve in Portugal. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Portugal has also submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially brucellosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve in Portugal.

| (10) | Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Italy, Latvia and Portugal, Latvia should be declared as officially brucellosis-free Member State, all the provinces in the Region of Valle d’Aosta in Italy and all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve should be declared as officially brucellosis-free regions of Italy and Portugal respectively. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Italy, Latvia and Portugal, Latvia should be declared as officially brucellosis-free Member State, all the provinces in the Region of Valle d’Aosta in Italy and all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Algarve should be declared as officially brucellosis-free regions of Italy and Portugal respectively.

| (11) | Italy, Poland and Portugal have submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status laid down for in Directive 64/432/EEC for the provinces of Catania, Enna, Palermo and Ragusa in the region of Sicily in Italy, for 19 administrative regions (powiaty) within the superior administrative units (voivodships) of Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Pomorskie, Warmińsko-Mazurskie and Wielkopolskie in Poland and for all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative units (regiões) of Centro and Lisboa e Vale do Tejo and four administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Norte in Portugal. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Italy, Poland and Portugal have submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status laid down for in Directive 64/432/EEC for the provinces of Catania, Enna, Palermo and Ragusa in the region of Sicily in Italy, for 19 administrative regions (powiaty) within the superior administrative units (voivodships) of Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Pomorskie, Warmińsko-Mazurskie and Wielkopolskie in Poland and for all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative units (regiões) of Centro and Lisboa e Vale do Tejo and four administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Norte in Portugal.

| (12) | Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Italy, Poland and Portugal, the provinces of Catania, Enna, Palermo and Ragusa in the region of Sicily in Italy, the 19 administrative regions (powiaty) within the superior administrative units (voivodships) of Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Pomorskie, Warmińsko-Mazurskie and Wielkopolskie and all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative units (regiões) of Centro and Lisboa e Vale do Tejo and four administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Norte should be declared as officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions of Italy, Poland and Portugal respectively. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Italy, Poland and Portugal, the provinces of Catania, Enna, Palermo and Ragusa in the region of Sicily in Italy, the 19 administrative regions (powiaty) within the superior administrative units (voivodships) of Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Pomorskie, Warmińsko-Mazurskie and Wielkopolskie and all administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative units (regiões) of Centro and Lisboa e Vale do Tejo and four administrative regions (distritos) within the superior administrative unit (região) of Norte should be declared as officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions of Italy, Poland and Portugal respectively.

| (13) | The Annexes to Decision 2003/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Annexes to Decision 2003/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (14) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annexes to Decision 2003/467/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 2012.

For the Commission

John DALLI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p. 74.

2

---

ANNEX

The Annexes to Decision 2003/467/EC are amended as follows:

| (1) | in Annex I, Chapter 2 is replaced by the following:

  ‘
  CHAPTER 2


  Officially tuberculosis-free regions of Member States | In Italy:






  — | Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(1)

in Annex I, Chapter 2 is replaced by the following:

‘
  CHAPTER 2

Officially tuberculosis-free regions of Member States

In Italy:

—

Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara,

| — | Province of Bolzano, |
| --- | --- |

—

Province of Bolzano,

| — | Region Emilia-Romagna, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Emilia-Romagna,

| — | Region Friuli-Venezia Giulia, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Friuli-Venezia Giulia,

| — | Region Lazio: Provinces of Rieti, Viterbo, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Lazio: Provinces of Rieti, Viterbo,

| — | Region Lombardia, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Lombardia,

| — | Region Marche: Province of Ascoli Piceno, Fermo, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Marche: Province of Ascoli Piceno, Fermo,

| — | Region Piemonte: Provinces of Asti, Biella, Novara, Verbania, Vercelli, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Piemonte: Provinces of Asti, Biella, Novara, Verbania, Vercelli,

| — | Region Sardegna: Provinces of Cagliari, Medio-Campidano, Ogliastra, Olbia-Tempio, Oristano, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Sardegna: Provinces of Cagliari, Medio-Campidano, Ogliastra, Olbia-Tempio, Oristano,

| — | Region Toscana, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Toscana,

| — | Province of Trento, |
| --- | --- |

—

Province of Trento,

| — | Region Veneto. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Veneto.

| | In Portugal:






  — | Região Algarve: all distritos. |
| --- | --- | --- |

In Portugal:

—

Região Algarve: all distritos.

| | In the United Kingdom:






  — | Great Britain: Scotland’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

In the United Kingdom:

—

Great Britain: Scotland’;

| (2) | Annex II is replaced by the following:



  ‘ANNEX II

  CHAPTER 1


  Officially brucellosis-free Member States







  ISO code | Member State |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BE | Belgium |
| CZ | Czech Republic |
| DK | Denmark |
| DE | Germany |
| EE | Estonia |
| IE | Ireland |
| FR | France |
| LV | Latvia |
| LU | Luxembourg |
| NL | Netherlands |
| AT | Austria |
| PL | Poland |
| SI | Slovenia |
| SK | Slovakia |
| FI | Finland |
| SE | Sweden |

(2)

Annex II is replaced by the following:

‘ANNEX II

CHAPTER 1

Officially brucellosis-free Member States

ISO code

Member State

BE

Belgium

CZ

Czech Republic

DK

Denmark

DE

Germany

EE

Estonia

IE

Ireland

FR

France

LV

Latvia

LU

Luxembourg

NL

Netherlands

AT

Austria

PL

Poland

SI

Slovenia

SK

Slovakia

FI

Finland

SE

Sweden

CHAPTER 2

Officially brucellosis-free regions of Member States

| In Italy:





  Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara, |
| --- |

In Italy:

Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara,

| Province of Bolzano, |
| --- |

Province of Bolzano,

| Region Emilia-Romagna, |
| --- |

Region Emilia-Romagna,

| Region Friuli-Venezia Giulia, |
| --- |

Region Friuli-Venezia Giulia,

| Region Lazio: Province of Frosinone, Latina, Rieti, Viterbo, |
| --- |

Region Lazio: Province of Frosinone, Latina, Rieti, Viterbo,

| Region Liguria: Provinces of Imperia, Savona, |
| --- |

Region Liguria: Provinces of Imperia, Savona,

| Region Lombardia, |
| --- |

Region Lombardia,

| Region Marche, |
| --- |

Region Marche,

| Region Molise: Province of Campobasso, |
| --- |

Region Molise: Province of Campobasso,

| Region Piemonte, |
| --- |

Region Piemonte,

| Region Puglia: Province of Brindisi, |
| --- |

Region Puglia: Province of Brindisi,

| Region Sardegna, |
| --- |

Region Sardegna,

| Region Toscana, |
| --- |

Region Toscana,

| Province of Trento, |
| --- |

Province of Trento,

| Region Umbria, |
| --- |

Region Umbria,

| Region Valle d’Aosta, |
| --- |

Region Valle d’Aosta,

| Region Veneto. |
| --- |

Region Veneto.

| In Portugal:





  Região Algarve: all distritos, |
| --- |

In Portugal:

Região Algarve: all distritos,

| Região Autónoma dos Açores: Ilhas de Corvo, Faial, Flores, Graciosa, Pico, Santa Maria. |
| --- |

Região Autónoma dos Açores: Ilhas de Corvo, Faial, Flores, Graciosa, Pico, Santa Maria.

| In Spain:





  Province of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, |
| --- |

In Spain:

Province of Santa Cruz de Tenerife,

| Province of Las Palmas. |
| --- |

Province of Las Palmas.

| In the United Kingdom:





  Great Britain: England, Scotland, Wales, |
| --- |

In the United Kingdom:

Great Britain: England, Scotland, Wales,

| Isle of Man.’ |
| --- |

Isle of Man.’

| (3) | in Annex III, Chapter 2 is replaced by the following:

  ‘
  CHAPTER 2


  Officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions of Member States | In Italy:






  — | Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(3)

in Annex III, Chapter 2 is replaced by the following:

‘
  CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 2

Officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions of Member States

Officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free regions of Member States

In Italy:

—

Region Abruzzo: Province of Pescara,

| — | Province of Bolzano, |
| --- | --- |

—

Province of Bolzano,

| — | Region Campania: Province of Napoli, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Campania: Province of Napoli,

| — | Region Emilia-Romagna, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Emilia-Romagna,

| — | Region Friuli-Venezia Giulia, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Friuli-Venezia Giulia,

| — | Region Lazio: Provinces of Frosinone, Rieti, Viterbo, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Lazio: Provinces of Frosinone, Rieti, Viterbo,

| — | Region Liguria: Provinces of Imperia, Savona, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Liguria: Provinces of Imperia, Savona,

| — | Region Lombardia, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Lombardia,

| — | Region Marche, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Marche,

| — | Region Molise, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Molise,

| — | Region Piemonte, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Piemonte,

| — | Region of Puglia: Province of Brindisi, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region of Puglia: Province of Brindisi,

| — | Region Sardegna, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Sardegna,

| — | Region Sicilia: Provinces of Agrigento, Caltanissetta, Catania, Enna, Palermo, Ragusa, Siracusa, Trapani, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Sicilia: Provinces of Agrigento, Caltanissetta, Catania, Enna, Palermo, Ragusa, Siracusa, Trapani,

| — | Region Toscana, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Toscana,

| — | Province of Trento, |
| --- | --- |

—

Province of Trento,

| — | Region Umbria, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Umbria,

| — | Region Valle d’Aosta, |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Valle d’Aosta,

| — | Region Veneto. |
| --- | --- |

—

Region Veneto.

| | In Poland:






  — | Voivodship dolnośląskie






  Powiaty: | bolesławiecki, dzierżoniowski, głogowski, górowski, jaworski, jeleniogórski, Jelenia Góra, kamiennogórski, kłodzki, legnicki, Legnica, lubański, lubiński, lwówecki, milicki, oleśnicki, oławski, polkowicki, strzeliński, średzki, świdnicki, trzebnicki, wałbrzyski, Wałbrzych, wołowski, wrocławski, Wrocław, ząbkowicki, zgorzelecki, złotoryjski. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

In Poland:

—

Voivodship dolnośląskie

Powiaty:

bolesławiecki, dzierżoniowski, głogowski, górowski, jaworski, jeleniogórski, Jelenia Góra, kamiennogórski, kłodzki, legnicki, Legnica, lubański, lubiński, lwówecki, milicki, oleśnicki, oławski, polkowicki, strzeliński, średzki, świdnicki, trzebnicki, wałbrzyski, Wałbrzych, wołowski, wrocławski, Wrocław, ząbkowicki, zgorzelecki, złotoryjski.

| — | Voivodship lubelskie






  Powiaty: | bialski, Biała Podlaska, biłgorajski, chełmski, Chełm, hrubieszowski, janowski, krasnostawski, kraśnicki, lubartowski, lubelski, Lublin, łęczyński, łukowski, opolski, parczewski, puławski, radzyński, rycki, świdnicki, tomaszowski, włodawski, zamojski, Zamość. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship lubelskie

Powiaty:

bialski, Biała Podlaska, biłgorajski, chełmski, Chełm, hrubieszowski, janowski, krasnostawski, kraśnicki, lubartowski, lubelski, Lublin, łęczyński, łukowski, opolski, parczewski, puławski, radzyński, rycki, świdnicki, tomaszowski, włodawski, zamojski, Zamość.

| — | Voivodship lubuskie






  Powiaty: | gorzowski, Gorzów Wielkopolski, krośnieńsko-odrzański, międzyrzecki, nowosolski, słubicki, strzelecko–drezdenecki, sulęciński, świebodziński, Zielona Góra, zielonogórski, żagański, żarski, wschowski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship lubuskie

Powiaty:

gorzowski, Gorzów Wielkopolski, krośnieńsko-odrzański, międzyrzecki, nowosolski, słubicki, strzelecko–drezdenecki, sulęciński, świebodziński, Zielona Góra, zielonogórski, żagański, żarski, wschowski.

| — | Voivodship kujawsko-pomorskie






  Powiaty: | aleksandrowski, brodnicki, bydgoski, Bydgoszcz, chełmiński, golubsko-dobrzyński, grudziądzki, inowrocławski, lipnowski, Grudziądz, mogileński, nakielski, radziejowski, rypiński, sępoleński, świecki, toruński, Toruń, tucholski, wąbrzeski, Włocławek, włocławski, żniński. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship kujawsko-pomorskie

Powiaty:

aleksandrowski, brodnicki, bydgoski, Bydgoszcz, chełmiński, golubsko-dobrzyński, grudziądzki, inowrocławski, lipnowski, Grudziądz, mogileński, nakielski, radziejowski, rypiński, sępoleński, świecki, toruński, Toruń, tucholski, wąbrzeski, Włocławek, włocławski, żniński.

| — | Voivodship łódzkie






  Powiaty: | bełchatowski, brzeziński, kutnowski, łaski, łęczycki, łowicki, łódzki, Łódź, opoczyński, pabianicki, pajęczański, piotrkowski, Piotrków Trybunalski, poddębicki, radomszczański, rawski, sieradzki, skierniewicki, Skierniewice, tomaszowski, wieluński, wieruszowski, zduńskowolski, zgierski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship łódzkie

Powiaty:

bełchatowski, brzeziński, kutnowski, łaski, łęczycki, łowicki, łódzki, Łódź, opoczyński, pabianicki, pajęczański, piotrkowski, Piotrków Trybunalski, poddębicki, radomszczański, rawski, sieradzki, skierniewicki, Skierniewice, tomaszowski, wieluński, wieruszowski, zduńskowolski, zgierski.

| — | Voivodship małopolskie






  Powiaty: | brzeski, bocheński, chrzanowski, dąbrowski, gorlicki, krakowski, Kraków, limanowski, miechowski, myślenicki, nowosądecki, nowotarski, Nowy Sącz, oświęcimski, olkuski, proszowicki, suski, tarnowski, Tarnów, tatrzański, wadowicki, wielicki. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship małopolskie

Powiaty:

brzeski, bocheński, chrzanowski, dąbrowski, gorlicki, krakowski, Kraków, limanowski, miechowski, myślenicki, nowosądecki, nowotarski, Nowy Sącz, oświęcimski, olkuski, proszowicki, suski, tarnowski, Tarnów, tatrzański, wadowicki, wielicki.

| — | Voivodship mazowieckie






  Powiaty: | białobrzeski, ciechanowski, garwoliński, grójecki, gostyniński, grodziski, kozienicki, legionowski, lipski, łosicki, makowski, miński, mławski, nowodworski, ostrołęcki, Ostrołęka, ostrowski, otwocki, piaseczyński, Płock, płocki, płoński, pruszkowski, przasnyski, przysuski, pułtuski, Radom, radomski, Siedlce, siedlecki, sierpecki, sochaczewski, sokołowski, szydłowiecki, Warszawa, warszawski zachodni, węgrowski, wołomiński, wyszkowski, zwoleński, żuromiński, żyrardowski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship mazowieckie

Powiaty:

białobrzeski, ciechanowski, garwoliński, grójecki, gostyniński, grodziski, kozienicki, legionowski, lipski, łosicki, makowski, miński, mławski, nowodworski, ostrołęcki, Ostrołęka, ostrowski, otwocki, piaseczyński, Płock, płocki, płoński, pruszkowski, przasnyski, przysuski, pułtuski, Radom, radomski, Siedlce, siedlecki, sierpecki, sochaczewski, sokołowski, szydłowiecki, Warszawa, warszawski zachodni, węgrowski, wołomiński, wyszkowski, zwoleński, żuromiński, żyrardowski.

| — | Voivodship opolskie






  Powiaty: | brzeski, głubczycki, kędzierzyńsko-kozielski, kluczborski, krapkowicki, namysłowski, nyski, oleski, opolski, Opole, prudnicki, strzelecki. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship opolskie

Powiaty:

brzeski, głubczycki, kędzierzyńsko-kozielski, kluczborski, krapkowicki, namysłowski, nyski, oleski, opolski, Opole, prudnicki, strzelecki.

| — | Voivodship podkarpackie






  Powiaty: | bieszczadzki, brzozowski, dębicki, jarosławski, jasielski, kolbuszowski, krośnieński, Krosno, leski, leżajski, lubaczowski, łańcucki, mielecki, niżański, przemyski, Przemyśl, przeworski, ropczycko-sędziszowski, rzeszowski, Rzeszów, sanocki, stalowowolski, strzyżowski, Tarnobrzeg, tarnobrzeski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship podkarpackie

Powiaty:

bieszczadzki, brzozowski, dębicki, jarosławski, jasielski, kolbuszowski, krośnieński, Krosno, leski, leżajski, lubaczowski, łańcucki, mielecki, niżański, przemyski, Przemyśl, przeworski, ropczycko-sędziszowski, rzeszowski, Rzeszów, sanocki, stalowowolski, strzyżowski, Tarnobrzeg, tarnobrzeski.

| — | Voivodship podlaskie






  Powiaty: | augustowski, białostocki, Białystok, bielski, grajewski, hajnowski, kolneński, łomżyński, Łomża, moniecki, sejneński, siemiatycki, sokólski, suwalski, Suwałki, wysokomazowiecki, zambrowski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship podlaskie

Powiaty:

augustowski, białostocki, Białystok, bielski, grajewski, hajnowski, kolneński, łomżyński, Łomża, moniecki, sejneński, siemiatycki, sokólski, suwalski, Suwałki, wysokomazowiecki, zambrowski.

| — | Voivodship pomorskie






  Powiaty: | Gdańsk, gdański, Gdynia, lęborski, pucki, nowodworski, Sopot, wejherowski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship pomorskie

Powiaty:

Gdańsk, gdański, Gdynia, lęborski, pucki, nowodworski, Sopot, wejherowski.

| — | Voivodship śląskie






  Powiaty: | będziński, bielski, Bielsko-Biała, bieruńsko-lędziński, Bytom, Chorzów, cieszyński, częstochowski, Częstochowa, Dąbrowa Górnicza, gliwicki, Gliwice, Jastrzębie Zdrój, Jaworzno, Katowice, kłobucki, lubliniecki, mikołowski, Mysłowice, myszkowski, Piekary Śląskie, pszczyński, raciborski, Ruda Śląska, rybnicki, Rybnik, Siemianowice Śląskie, Sosnowiec, Świętochłowice, tarnogórski, Tychy, wodzisławski, Zabrze, zawierciański, Żory, żywiecki. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship śląskie

Powiaty:

będziński, bielski, Bielsko-Biała, bieruńsko-lędziński, Bytom, Chorzów, cieszyński, częstochowski, Częstochowa, Dąbrowa Górnicza, gliwicki, Gliwice, Jastrzębie Zdrój, Jaworzno, Katowice, kłobucki, lubliniecki, mikołowski, Mysłowice, myszkowski, Piekary Śląskie, pszczyński, raciborski, Ruda Śląska, rybnicki, Rybnik, Siemianowice Śląskie, Sosnowiec, Świętochłowice, tarnogórski, Tychy, wodzisławski, Zabrze, zawierciański, Żory, żywiecki.

| — | Voivodship świętokrzyskie






  Powiaty: | buski, jędrzejowski, kazimierski, kielecki, Kielce, konecki, opatowski, ostrowiecki, pińczowski, sandomierski, skarżyski, starachowicki, staszowski, włoszczowski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship świętokrzyskie

Powiaty:

buski, jędrzejowski, kazimierski, kielecki, Kielce, konecki, opatowski, ostrowiecki, pińczowski, sandomierski, skarżyski, starachowicki, staszowski, włoszczowski.

| — | Voivodship warmińsko-mazurskie






  Powiaty: | bartoszycki, braniewski, działdowski Elbląg, elbląski, ełcki, giżycki, gołdapski, iławski, kętrzyński, lidzbarski, mrągowski, nidzicki, nowomiejski, olecki, olsztyński, ostródzki, Olsztyn, piski, szczycieński, węgorzewski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship warmińsko-mazurskie

Powiaty:

bartoszycki, braniewski, działdowski Elbląg, elbląski, ełcki, giżycki, gołdapski, iławski, kętrzyński, lidzbarski, mrągowski, nidzicki, nowomiejski, olecki, olsztyński, ostródzki, Olsztyn, piski, szczycieński, węgorzewski.

| — | Voivodship wielkopolskie






  Powiaty: | gostyński, jarociński, kaliski, Kalisz, kępiński, kolski, koniński, Konin, krotoszyński, międzychodzki, nowotomyski, ostrowski, ostrzeszowski, pleszewski, rawicki, słupecki, szamotulski, średzki, śremski, turecki, wolsztyński, wrzesiński, złotowski. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Voivodship wielkopolskie

Powiaty:

gostyński, jarociński, kaliski, Kalisz, kępiński, kolski, koniński, Konin, krotoszyński, międzychodzki, nowotomyski, ostrowski, ostrzeszowski, pleszewski, rawicki, słupecki, szamotulski, średzki, śremski, turecki, wolsztyński, wrzesiński, złotowski.

| | In Portugal:






  — | Região Algarve: all distritos, |
| --- | --- | --- |

In Portugal:

—

Região Algarve: all distritos,

| — | Região Alentejo: all distritos, |
| --- | --- |

—

Região Alentejo: all distritos,

| — | Região Centro: all distritos, |
| --- | --- |

—

Região Centro: all distritos,

| — | Região Lisboa e Vale do Tejo: all distritos, |
| --- | --- |

—

Região Lisboa e Vale do Tejo: all distritos,

| — | Região Norte: districtos: Braga, Bragança, Viana do Castelo, Vila Real, |
| --- | --- |

—

Região Norte: districtos: Braga, Bragança, Viana do Castelo, Vila Real,

| — | Região Autónoma dos Açores. |
| --- | --- |

—

Região Autónoma dos Açores.

| | In the United Kingdom:






  — | The Isle of Man.’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

In the United Kingdom:

—

The Isle of Man.’

---