alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6170
JACOB MUHAMMAD FARRAKHAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD MOATS, Warden; MUHAMMAD SALAAM, Islamic Chaplain; RICHARD LANHAM, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 1081-AMD) Submitted: June 11, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996 Before HALL, LUTTIG, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacob Muhammad Farrakhan, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order disposing of only one of his claims raised in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-8004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DIA APRIL MONTAGUE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(CR-98-205; CA-04-3511-DKC)

Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dia April Montague, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dia April Montague, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find both that the district court’s assessment of her

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Montague has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 55 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 55

  Congratulating His Excellency, General Vasco Joaquim Rocha Vieira, 
Governor of Macao, and the Macao government on the Third Meeting of the 
              Macanese people, the ``Terceiro Encontro''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 1999

  Mr. Pombo submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating His Excellency, General Vasco Joaquim Rocha Vieira, 
Governor of Macao, and the Macao government on the Third Meeting of the 
              Macanese people, the ``Terceiro Encontro''.

Whereas the Third Meeting of the Macanese people from throughout the world, the 
        ``Terceiro Encontro'', will take place in Macao the week of March 21, 
        1999;
Whereas the reunion symbolizes the importance of cultural diversity, social 
        cohesion, and international ties in the historical development of Macao;
Whereas the people of Macao reflect a unique and positive blending of the 
        European and Asian cultures;
Whereas United States citizens of Macanese ancestry have made significant 
        contributions to the social, political, and economic welfare in the 
        communities in which they reside; and
Whereas these citizens have encouraged and fostered trade between the United 
        States and Nations in the Pacific Rim: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress of the United States extends its congratulations to 
His Excellency, General Vasco Joaquim Rocha Vieira, Governor of Macao, 
and the Macao government on the Third Meeting of the Macanese people, 
the ``Terceiro Encontro.''
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 251 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                         June 23, 2000.
      Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives 
(H. Con. Res. 251) entitled ``Concurrent resolution commending the 
Republic of Croatia for the conduct of its parliamentary and 
presidential elections.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

            Strike out all after the resolving clause and insert:

That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the people of the Republic of Croatia are to be 
        congratulated on the successful elections and the outgoing 
        Government of Croatia is to be commended for the democratic 
        standards with which it managed the elections;
            (2) the United States should support the efforts of the new 
        Government of Croatia to increase its work on refugee return, 
        privatization reform, media reform, and further cooperation 
        with the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia 
        (ICTY) to set an example to other countries in the region;
            (3) Congress strongly supports Croatia's commitment to 
        western democratic standards and will give its full support to 
        the new Government of Croatia to fully implement democratic 
        reforms; and
            (4) the United States continues to promote Croatian-
        American economic, political, and military relations and 
        recognizes Croatia as a loyal partner in south central Europe.

    Amend the preamble as follows:
    Page 2, first unnumbered line, strike out [landslide]

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 251

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                           728,413
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                    5,901,439
<ALLOWANCES>                     (23,284)
<INVENTORY>                     3,897,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               10,919,943
<PP&E>                          2,922,617
<DEPRECIATION>                   (615,162)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 14,874,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,968,582
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            5,270
<OTHER-SE>                      6,758,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   14,874,087
<SALES>                        26,972,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               26,972,181
<CGS>                          25,674,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  25,674,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,436,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                338,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (464,930)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (464,930)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.09)



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2021

No. 04-21-00088-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ELAINE EISELE ADAMS

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14997

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late clerk’s record, stating that the 

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record 

and that the appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s fee has been paid or 

arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without 

paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal for 

want of prosecution if clerk’s record is not filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
No. 55768.

protest 170949-K (New York).

#### Hugo Hreglich *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 115

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 24, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 106–275, is further amended by strik4 ing the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting

5 ‘‘October 26, 2000’’.

Æ
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ MASS ENGINEERED DESIGN, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2019

- 1365

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in No. 3:16

- cv

- 01510

- SI, Judge Michael H. Simon.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
J OHN J. E DMONDS , Edmonds & Schlather, PLLC, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff

- appellee. Also represented by S TEPHEN F. S CHLATHER

.

D AVID W. L ONG , Essential Patent LLC, Oak Hill, VA, argued for defendant

- appellant. Also represented by A NDREW T IM OTHY O LIVER , Amin Turocy & Watson LLP, San Jose, CA; J ENNY C HEN , Chen IP Law, Taipei

, Taiwan.

______________________ Case: 19-1365 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 03/22/20212 MASS ENGINEERED DESIGN , INC

. v. PLANAR SYS ., INC

.

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , D YK , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 22, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 19-1365 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 03/22/2021
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended April 30, 2006, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
    /s/ KENNETH C. BUDDEKenneth C. BuddePresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of Satellite Drag and Spin Decay DataWork was begun as an effort to obtain satellite drag and upper atmospheric wind data from a spinning spherical satellite to be launched from the space shuttle scheduled for the STS-11 flight. The satellite was an inflated sphere having high area-to-mass ratio which would result in measurable orbital decay due to aerodynamic drag forces experienced by the satellite in the Earth's upper atmosphere. The satellite would also experience a spin decay due to the aerodynamic torque acting to slow the satellite spinning. The original proposal was to develop data analysis procedures to be employed to extract the desired information. Work was performed concerning the data analysis procedure prior to the STS-11 launch; however, the major effort was to begin after the data had been obtained. Unfortunately, the launch of the inflatable sphere on STS-11 was a failure in that the sphere did not inflate properly and no data was obtained. The emphasis of the work planned under this effort was then changed to develop a proposal for a series of experiments similar to the one originally planned for STS-11.Document ID19860006782Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKarr, G. R.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1985Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:178609NASA-CR-178609UAH-456Accession Number86N16252Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-35663Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860006782.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 446

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One

Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 15, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session

of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, December 15, 2000, Saturday, Decem4 ber 16, 2000, or Sunday, December 17, 2000, on a motion

5 offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Ma6 jority Leader or his designee, it shall stand adjourned sine

7 die, or until noon on the second day after Members are

8 notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concur9 rent resolution; and that when the Senate adjourns on Fri10 day, December 15, 2000, Saturday, December 16, 2000,
2

HCON 446 ATH

1 or Sunday, December 17, 2000, on a motion offered pur2 suant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

3 or his designee, it shall stand adjourned sine die, or until

4 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas5 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution.

6 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

7 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

8 the Majority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader

9 of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and

10 Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opin11 ion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
No. 07-14-00345-CR

Marc Allen Mason

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 251st District Court

 of Randall County

December 9, 2015

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 9, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
No. 63964.

protests 59/24439, 59/8174, and 59/8173 (New York).

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 73

Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools should consider

starting school after 9:00 in the morning.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Ms. LOFGREN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools

should consider starting school after 9:00 in the morning.

Whereas scientific studies indicate that adolescents experience

hormonal changes that keep them awake at night;

Whereas most secondary schools begin classes at 7:30 or earlier in the morning;

Whereas most teen crime occurs between 3:00 and 6:00 in

the afternoon and a later start would result in a later

school day; and

Whereas many adolescents do not get enough sleep to realize

their full academic potential: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that sec-
2

•HCON 73 IH

1 ondary schools should begin classes after 9:00 in the

2 morning.

Æ
Before the Third Division,

December 27, 1967

No. P67/438.

#### National Silver Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 64/20430, etc. (San Diego).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 68587.

protest 63/8468 (Philadelphia).

#### Lanston Monotype Div. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monophoto machines or parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lanston Industries, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 CCPA 123, C.A.D. 807), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 345

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas there are many thousands of public memorials scattered throughout the United States and abroad that commemorate military conflicts of the United States and the

service of individuals in the Armed Forces;

Whereas these memorials have never been comprehensively

cataloged;
2

HCON 345 RFS

Whereas many of these memorials suffer from neglect and

disrepair, and many have been relocated or stored in facilities where they are unavailable to the public and subject to further neglect and damage;

Whereas there exists a need to collect and centralize information regarding the location, status, and description of

these memorials;

Whereas the Federal Government maintains information on

memorials only if they are Federally funded; and

Whereas Remembering Veterans Who Earned Their Stripes

(a nonprofit corporation established as RVETS, Inc.

under the laws of the State of Nevada) has undertaken

a self-funded program to catalogue the memorials located

in the United States that commemorate military conflicts

of the United States and the service of individuals in the

Armed Forces, and has already obtained information on

more than 7000 memorials in 50 States: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the people of the United States owe a debt

4 of gratitude to veterans for their sacrifices in de5 fending the Nation during times of war and peace;

6 (2) public memorials that commemorate mili7 tary conflicts of the United States and the service of

8 individuals in the Armed Forces should be main9 tained in good condition, so that future generations

10 may know of the burdens borne by these individuals;
3

HCON 345 RFS

1 (3) Federal, State, and local agencies respon2 sible for the construction and maintenance of these

3 memorials should cooperate in cataloging these me4 morials and providing the resulting information to

5 the Department of the Interior; and

6 (4) the Secretary of the Interior, acting through

7 the Director of the National Park Service, should—

8 (A) collect and maintain information on

9 public memorials that commemorate military

10 conflicts of the United States and the service of

11 individuals in the Armed Forces;

12 (B) coordinate efforts at collecting and

13 maintaining this information with similar ef14 forts by other entities, such as Remembering

15 Veterans Who Earned Their Stripes (a non16 profit corporation established as RVETS, Inc.

17 under the laws of the State of Nevada); and

18 (C) make this information available to the

19 public.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.