alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Business Emergency Operations Center (NBEOC) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

June 2023 1

National Business Emergency Operations 

Center (NBEOC)

FEMA’s National Business Emergency Operations Center (NBEOC) coordinates and

enhances information-sharing among government partners and business, industry, and 

infrastructure organizations — before, during, and after disasters.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can my business contract with FEMA to support recovery after a disaster? 

Please visit sam.gov/content/home or www.fema.gov/doing-business to learn how your company can bid on a 

contract with FEMA. The NBEOC cannot answer specific procurement questions.

Where can I find information on federal disaster funding or grants for my business? 

Businesses may be eligible for funding from the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and can apply for 

assistance at Disaster Assistance (sba.gov). Private non-profit organizations may also be eligible for funding through 

the FEMA Public Assistance Program (www.fema.gov/assistance/public). FEMA’s Recovery and Resilience Resource 

Library (fema.gov/emergency-managers/practitioners/recovery-resilience-resource-library) includes information on 

numerous additional funding programs available through other federal agency partners. The NBEOC does not 

provide financial assistance, and being a member of the NBEOC does not increase the chance of receiving funds.

How can I or my employees receive disaster assistance for damages to personal property? 

FEMA provides disaster assistance to eligible individuals or households through the FEMA Individual Assistance 

program. Individuals may apply for assistance on the program webpage (fema.gov/assistance/individual). 

How can I offer donations or volunteer during a disaster? 

Businesses and individuals can find information about donating and volunteering with FEMA on the Volunteer and 

Donate webpage (fema.gov/disaster/recover/volunteer-donate). 

 
National Business Emergency Operations Center (NBEOC) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

June 2023 2

How does the NBEOC coordinate with public-private partnerships and Business Emergency Operations 

Centers (BEOCs) at the federal, state, and local levels? 

The NBEOC works in tandem with existing emergency management structures or mechanisms. The NBEOC

enhances other plans and programs by facilitating effective communications to support rapid response and 

coordinated action. Existing BEOCs may also serve as virtual NBEOC members, sharing their situational awareness 

and information when activated.

How can I contact the NBEOC if I have other questions? 

The NBEOC can be reached by emailing NBEOC@connect.gov.
exv10w01



 




Exhibit 10.01




June 9, 2003




Mr. Jim Bazlen




4421 East Horseshoe Drive





Phoenix, Arizona 85028





Dear Jim:



     
This letter shall serve to amend, effective as of
June 11, 2003 (“Effective Date”), the
terms and conditions of your employment relationship pursuant to
that certain letter agreement dated March 30, 2000 between
you and CSK Auto, Inc. (the “Agreement”):



     
1.     As of the
Effective Date, your annual base salary shall be modified to
fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), to be paid on a bi-weekly
basis.



     
2.     In addition, you
shall receive in connection with your membership on the Board of
Directors a fee of $1,500.00 plus reasonable expenses for
physical attendance at each Board meeting (regular or special)
and each committee meeting that requires a separate trip (i.e.,
if the committee meeting does not occur in connection with a
Board of Directors meeting). For each Board of Directors or
committee meeting (regular or special) attended telephonically,
you shall be paid a fee of $500.00. Such meeting fees and
expenses shall be reimbursed at the end of each fiscal quarter.



     
3.     Except as
expressly modified and amended herein, the terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect;
provided, however, that in the event of any conflict in the
provisions of the Agreement and the provisions of this letter,
the provisions of this letter shall govern and control.



     
If the foregoing is acceptable, please
acknowledge your agreement to the terms and conditions set forth
above by signing and dating below.




		
	 	
    Very truly yours,
    
	 
	 	
    Maynard L. Jenkins
    
	 	
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	
    Acknowledged and Accepted
    
	 	
    this                     day
    of June, 2003
    







		
	 	
    

	 	
    Jim Bazlen
Before the Second Division,

September 22, 1952

No. 56871.

#### J. H. Kimball, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 141753-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the involved

merchandise consist of woven silk fabrics, valued at more than $5.50 per pound, the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Walter Strassburger & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 210, C. D. 1326). Accepting the stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse prior to January 1, 1948, is dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1205, as modified by T. D. 48316, and that which was entered for consumption or withdrawn from *374warehouse subsequent to said date is dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802.
Exhibit 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

                                  Certification

            I, Susan Mills, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Citigroup
Mortgage Loan Trust Inc., Series 2005-OPT3, Asset Backed Pass-Through
Certificates;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company and Option One Mortgage Corporation.

                                        CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC.


                                        By:    /s/ Susan Mills
                                               --------------------------------
                                        Name:  Susan Mills
                                        Title: Vice President
                                        Date:  3/27/06
September 4, 1952

No. 56849.

Suit 4742.

#### United States *v.*National Tube Company.

Reap. Dec. 8107. (Appeal dismissed July 10, 1952.)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 7 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 7

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
 tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
                 home should not be further restricted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mrs. Roukema submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
 tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
                 home should not be further restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal, which promotes social and 
        economic benefits beyond the benefits that accrue to the occupant of the 
        home;
Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting economic security and 
        stability for American families;
Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should 
        continue to be to encourage homeownership;
Whereas the increase in the cost of housing over the last 10 years has been 
        greater than the increase in family income;
Whereas, for the first time in 50 years, the percentage of people in the United 
        States owning their own homes has declined;
Whereas the percentage of people in the United States between the ages of 25 and 
        29 who own their own home has declined from 43 percent in 1976 to 38 
        percent today;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation's 
        housing policy for most of this century and may well be the most 
        important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by second homes is of crucial importance to the economies of 
        many communities;
Whereas the continued deductibility of interest paid on debt secured by a first 
        or second home has particular importance in promoting other desirable 
        social goals, such as education of young people; and
Whereas the Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a 
        first or second home has been limited twice in the last 6 years, and was 
        further eroded as a result of the 1990 Budget Act: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
home should not be further restricted.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350

 

I, Loren K. Jensen, the Chief Financial Officer of Tuesday MorningCorporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.                                       Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tuesday Morning Corporation for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TuesdayMorning Corporation.

 

 
| Date: August 1, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Loren K. Jensen                      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Loren K. Jensen  Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-60223 Summary Calendar

_____________________

RICHARD BARRETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Justice,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-264-BrN)

_________________________________________________________________ November 20, 1997 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Richard Barrett, pro se , appeals the summary judgment denying

his request for attorney’s fees in his pro se Freedom of

Information Act action, 5 U.S.C. § 552, contending that the

district court concluded erroneou sly that there was no genuine

issue of material fact concerning entitlement to them. Pursuant to

our de novo review we AFFIRM the summary judgment for essentially

the reasons stated by the district court in its detailed and well-- 2 -

re asoned opinion. B arrett v. United States
, No. 3:95-CV-264-BrN

(S.D. Miss. March 17, 1997).

AFFIRMED
Before the Third Division,

January 13, 1949

No. 52817.

#### Consumers Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 780884-G, etc. (Philadelphia, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 389

Supporting the goals and ideas of National Take Your Kids To Vote Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mrs. MORELLA (for herself, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr.

BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. FROST, Mr. PASTOR,

Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. CARSON, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr.

CUMMINGS, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. BONIOR, Ms.

MCKINNEY, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. MCKEON,

Mr. CASTLE, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr.

ENGEL, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. DICKS, and Mr. GILMAN)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideas of National Take Your Kids

To Vote Day.

Whereas voting is a civic duty and critical to democracy;

Whereas voting participation rates in the United States for

all age groups have fallen dramatically since 1972;

Whereas voting participation rates are lower among young

voters;
2

HCON 389 IH

Whereas only 32 percent of individuals in the range of 18

through 24 years of age voted in the last Presidential

election;

Whereas large numbers of young people feel disconnected

from government;

Whereas many younger adults report that they do not know

how to vote;

Whereas, according to a 1996 study by the Bureau of the

Census, children are far more likely to vote when they become adults if their parents voted;

Whereas parents should talk to their children about the importance of voting;

Whereas a number of businesses and organizations have designated November 7, 2000, as National Take Your Kids

To Vote Day in order to encourage people to vote; and

Whereas many Americans will go to the polls on November

7, 2000, to elect a new President and a new Congress:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports the goals and ideas of National

4 Take Your Kids To Vote day;

5 (2) encourages all voting eligible parents with

6 children who are younger than 18 years of age to

7 talk to their children about the importance of voting

8 and, if possible, take their children to the polls; and

9 (3) requests that the President issue a procla10 mation calling on the people of the United States to
3

HCON 389 IH

1 conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, and pro2 grams to promote voting as a family tradition.

Æ
# L_2022140DE.01006301.xml

| 19.5.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 140/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 140/63

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2022/263 des Rates vom 23. Februar 2022 über restriktive Maßnahmen als Reaktion auf die Anerkennung der nicht von der Regierung kontrollierten Gebiete der ukrainischen Regionen Donezk und Luhansk und die Entsendung russischer Streitkräfte in diese Gebiete

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 42I vom 23. Februar 2022
  )

Seite 79, Artikel 2 Absatz 2 Buchstabe a

Anstatt:

„die Erfüllung von Handelsverträgen, die vor dem 24. Mai 2022 abgeschlossen wurden, oder von akzessorischen Verträgen, die für die Erfüllung dieser Verträge erforderlich sind, bis zum 23 Februar 2022, vorausgesetzt, die natürliche oder juristische Person, Einrichtung oder Organisation, die den Vertrag erfüllen will, hat die Tätigkeit oder Transaktion mindestens 10 Arbeitstage im Voraus bei der zuständigen Behörde des Mitgliedstaats, in dem sie niedergelassen ist, gemeldet;“

muss es heißen:

„die Erfüllung — bis zum 24. Mai 2022 — von Handelsverträgen, die vor dem 23. Februar 2022 abgeschlossen wurden, oder von akzessorischen Verträgen, die für die Erfüllung dieser Verträge erforderlich sind, vorausgesetzt, die natürliche oder juristische Person, Einrichtung oder Organisation, die den Vertrag erfüllen will, hat die Tätigkeit oder Transaktion mindestens 10 Arbeitstage im Voraus bei der zuständigen Behörde des Mitgliedstaats, in dem sie niedergelassen ist, gemeldet;“

---
No. 58781.

protests 230249-K, etc. (New York).

#### Chelsea Lamp & Shade Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise*eonsists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter *“A”*were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
No. 51821.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 126084-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







**AMERICAN
      TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
      N. Plamondon, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




June
              19,
              2006*/s/
WILLIAM
                N. PLAMONDON, III***
            *WILLIAM
                N. PLAMONDON, III*
              *CHIEF
                EXECUTIVE OFFICER*
No. 63962.

protests 59/23630, 59/26480, and 59/24087 (New York).

#### Vanguard Recording Society, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of recording tapes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.64
                                AMENDMENT NO. 10
                                     TO THE
                     POSTSCRIPT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LICENSE
                            AND SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN
                           ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
                          PEERLESS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                          EFFECTIVE AS OF JULY 31, 2003

      This Amendment No. 10 (the "Amendment") to the PostScript Software
Development License and Sublicense Agreement dated July 23, 1999, as previously
amended (the "Agreement") is between Adobe Systems Incorporated, a Delaware
corporation having a place of business at 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA 95110
("Adobe") and Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation having a
place of business at 2381 Rosecrans Avenue, El Segundo, California 90245
("Peerless").

      WHEREAS, the purpose of this Amendment to the Agreement is to remove the
requirement of including the *.

      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1.    Paragraph 9.1.1 (" Minimum Bundling Requirements For Japanese Typefaces")
      of EXHIBIT O ("Royalty Payments And Other Fees") of the Agreement is
      hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

      9.1.1 Minimum Bundling Requirements for Japanese Typefaces.

                                        *


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of Adobe and Peerless has executed this Amendment No.
10 to the PostScript Software Development License and Sublicense Agreement by
its duly authorized officer.

Adobe                                   Peerless

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED              PEERLESS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jim Stephens                    By: /s/ William R. Neil
   ------------------------                ----------------------------------
Print                                   Print
Name:  Jim Stephens                     Name:   William R. Neil

Title:   SVP Worldwide Sales and        Title:  Vice President of Finance and
         Field Operations                       Chief Financial Officer

Date:    7/28/03                        Date:   July 14, 2003


Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this document. This
copy of the document filed as an Exhibit omits the information subject to the
confidentiality request. Omissions are designated by an asterisk (*). A complete
version of this document has been filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.