alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 398

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

to honor the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2000

Mr. FORBES (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. LANTOS,

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BONIOR,

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. FROST, and Mr.

MCNULTY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued to honor the Jewish War Veterans

of the United States of America.

Whereas the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of

America is an organization of patriotic Americans dedicated to highlighting the role of Jews in the United

States Armed Forces;

Whereas thousands of Jews have proudly served the Nation

in times of war;

Whereas thousands of Jews have died in combat while serving

in the United States Armed Forces;
2

•HCON 398 IH

Whereas, in World War II alone, Jews received more than

52,000 awards for outstanding service in the United

States Armed Forces, including the Medal of Honor, the

Air Medal, the Silver Star, and the Purple Heart;

Whereas, in World War II alone, over 11,000 Jews died in

combat while serving in the United States Armed Forces;

Whereas members of the Jewish War Veterans of the United

States of America have volunteered over 10,000,000

hours at veterans’ hospitals; and

Whereas honoring the sacrifices of Jewish veterans is an important component of recognizing the strong and patriotic role Jews have played in the United States Armed

Forces: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued to honor

4 the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of

5 America; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee of

7 the United States Postal Service should recommend

8 to the Postmaster General that such a postage

9 stamp be issued.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(a)/RULE 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, William Y. Tauscher,
certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ William Y. Tauscher
|                    |  |  |  | William Y. Tauscher    
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective July 28, 2003



 Exhibit 10.35 
  
 2nd Amendment to
Employment Agreement Dated December 17th, 
 1999 
 (1st Amendment to Employment Agreement was on August 5th, 2002) 
  
 Amendment is effective as of Monday July
28th, 2003, between Proflowers (Company) and Abe Wynperle (Executive). 
  
 The company and Executive desire to amend certain terms and conditions set forth in the
original agreement dated December 17, 1999 and the amended agreement dated August 5, 2002. 
  
 The following are the amendments to the original and amended agreement. Outside of the listed changes below, all other aspects contained within each section of the original and 1st amended agreement will remain the same. 
  
 Amendments: 
  

	1)	 	Section 1.4.1. Base Salary. 

 Effective July 28,
2003, the annual Base Salary will be adjusted to Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000). 
  

	2)	 	Section 1.4.2. Variable Compensation. 

 Eligible to
receive an annual performance bonus having a target percentage up to fifty percent (50%) of base salary as approved by the Board. Executive must be employed by Proflowers on the last day of any applicable fiscal year in order to be eligible to
receive a bonus. 
  
 I have read this amendment and agree to the terms and
conditions described above in addition to the original and 1st amended employment agreement. 
  

	DATED:	 	 8/28/2003

	  	Employee’s Signature
			
	 	 	 	  	 /s/ Abraham J. Wynperle

  
 Abraham J. Wynperle

 Employee’s Name (Print)

			
	DATED:	 	 9/3/03

	  	Proflowers.com
			
	 	 	 	  	 /s/ Bill Strauss

 By: Bill Strauss
   CEO
No. 52413.

protests 136575-K, etc. (New York).

#### S. W. Heim & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 19, 2020

No. 04-20-00091-CV

Matthew L. WEBB,

Appellant

v.

HEB LP.,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI00522

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Matthew L. Webb filed an original petition in the trial court seeking authorization for a 

pre-suit deposition under Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. On January 22, 2020, 

the trial court signed an order denying the petition. On February 10, 2020, Webb filed a notice of 

appeal. On February 18, 2020, appellant filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of this 

appeal, but he subsequently rescinded this motion. On February 20, 2020, the clerk’s record was 

filed.1

We question our jurisdiction over this appeal. “A ruling on a Rule 202 petition constitutes 

a final, appealable order only if the petition seeks discovery from a third party against whom a

suit is not contemplated, but a Rule 202 ruling is interlocutory and does not constitute a final, 

appealable order if discovery is sought from a person against whom litigation is either pending or 

contemplated.” Sossamon v. Bardin, No. 11-12-00164-CV, 2012 WL 3537817, at*1 (Tex. 

App.—Eastland 2012, no pet.) (citing Thomas v. Fitzgerald, 166 S.W.3d 746 (Tex. App.—Waco 

2005, no pet.)). Here, Webb’s Rule 202 petition sought to depose an HEB, LP pharmacy 

employee, and it appears from the petition that Webb contemplated litigation against HEB, LP.

Therefore, the trial court’s January 22, 2020 order appears to be interlocutory in nature and we 

appear to lack jurisdiction over this appeal.

1Both parties have filed briefs in this appeal; however, this briefing is premature. In addition to the question of our 

jurisdiction, appellant has requested the preparation of the reporter’s record and it has not yet been filed.
We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by April 3, 2020 why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend all appellate deadlines 

pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
October 19, 1959

No. 63460.

Suit 4954.

#### United States *v.*Electrolux Corporation.

C.D. 1955 affirmed July 16, 1959. C.A.D. 718.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129028 Marilyn Kelly 129029 Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129028, 129029 COA: 254888, 254889 Wayne CC: 03-013048 CHARLES EDWARD TAYLOR, 03-013047 Defendant-Appellant. 03-011413

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 124 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.124

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 106(c) and 
inserting ``November 4, 2000''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 220

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

recognizing the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Mr. DAVIS of Virginia (for himself and Mr. ROHRABACHER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued recognizing the Islamic holy month of

Ramadan.

Whereas there are more than five million practicing Muslims

in the United States, who represent one of the fastest

growing segments of American society;

Whereas those who follow the Islamic faith are a diverse community comprised of all races, colors, and political opinions, who make important and valuable contributions to

American society and culture;

Whereas Ramadan is an Islamic holy month which follows

the lunar cycle and is observed by Muslims around the

world;
2

•HCON 220 IH

Whereas Muslims in the United States fast during the month

of Ramadan, from sunrise until sunset, abstaining from

food, drink, and sexual contact;

Whereas Ramadan lasts for 29 or 30 days, depending on the

cycle of the new Moon;

Whereas Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are the three

monotheistic religions of the world; and

Whereas Jewish and Christian holidays have been recognized

on United States postage stamps, but no Islamic observance is similarly commemorated: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a postage stamp recognizing the Islamic holy

5 month of Ramadan; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
Exhibit 99.2  -  Report of Management as to compliance with minimum
		 servicing standards for the year ended December 31, 2005


		[Countrywide HOME LOANS logo]

				2900 MADERA ROAD
				SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 93065-6298
				(805) 955-1000

		   Management Assertion




March 3, 2005

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Countrywide Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL, (collectively,
the "Company") have complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation for Mortgage
Bankers. As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect
a mortgage bankers' (fidelity) bond in the amount of $200 million
and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $100 million
and $130 million for the period January 1, 2005 to August 1, 2005
and for the period from August 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005,
respectively.





/s/ Steve Bailey
Steve Bailey
Senior Managing Director and
Chief Executive Officer, Loan Administration




/s/ Kevin Meyers
Kevin Meyers
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer,
Loan Administration
<PAGE>


                                       Smith  &  Company
                     A  Professional Corporation of Certified Public Accountants

March  26,  2002

Office  of  the  Chief  Accountant
SECPS  Letter  File
Mail  Stop  9-5
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
450  Fifth  Street,  NW  Washington,  D.C.,  20549

RE:  Legal  Access  Technologies,  Inc.
     SEC  File  No.  000-19457

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

We were previously the principal accountants for Legal Access Technologies, Inc.
and  on  April  7,  2001 we reported on the financial statements of Legal Access
Technologies, Inc. as of December 2000, and for the two years ended December 31,
2000  and 1999. On December 7, 2001, we were dismissed as principal accountants.
We  have  read Item 5 of the Form 10-QSB/A - Amendment No.1 for the period ended
October  31,  2001,  for  Legal  Access  Technologies,  Inc.  and agree with the
statements  contained  therein  regarding  Smith  &  Company.

Very  truly  yours,
Smith  &  Company

/s/  Roger  B.  Kennard
----------------------------
By:  Roger  B.  Kennard













         10 West 100 South, Suite 700 - Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1554

              Telephone: (801) 575-8297 - Facsimile: (801) 575-8306
                          E-mail: smithco@dotplanet.com

<PAGE>

  Members: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants - Utah Association
                         of Certified Public Accountants
No. 56857.

#### J. J. Boll and Newark Electric Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 178282-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ]4-watt or watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Con. Res. 44 Agreed to April 14, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE

OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall

be permitted to sponsor a public event, the eighteenth annual

National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service, on the Capitol Grounds

on May 15, 1999, or on such other date as the Speaker of the

House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate, in order to honor

the more than 160 law enforcement officers who died in the line

of duty during 1998.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized by section 1 shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The National Fraternal Order

of Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all

expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with

the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the

National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary are authorized

to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplification

devices, and other related structures and equipment, as may be

required for the event authorized by section 1.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, and

solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions
H. Con. Res. 44—2

applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event authorized by section 1.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 73810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23673]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 2, 25, 74, 78, 90, 97, and 101

[ET Docket No. 23-120; FCC 23-26; FR ID 181076]


Implementation of the Final Acts of the 2015 World Radio 
Communication Conference; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the preamble to a proposed rule 
published in the Federal Register of September 29, 2023, concerning 
implementation of certain allocation decisions from the Final Acts of 
the World Radiocommunication Conference 2015. The document provided an 
incorrect comment date and reply comment date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information, contact 
Jamie Coleman of the Office of Engineering and Technology, Policy and 
Rules Division, Spectrum Policy Branch, at (202) 418-2705 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3f9d2dedad69df0dcdfd6ded2ddf3d5d0d09dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f250e02060a412c00030a020e012f090c0c41080019">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 29, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-
19383, on page 67160, in the third column, correct the DATES caption to 
read:

DATES: Interested parties may file comments on or before November 28, 
2023; and reply comments on or before December 28, 2023. All filings 
must refer to ET Docket No. 23-120.

    This is a summary of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
(NPRM) in ET Docket No. 23-120; FCC 23-26, adopted on April 18, 2023, 
and released on April 21, 2023. The full text of this document is 
available for public inspection online at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-26A1.pdf.

Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-23673 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 60337.

protests 280919-K, etc. (New York).

#### Pollak Industrial Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

        CERTIFICATION OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 2003,
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:

-     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2003
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and

-     the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a part
of the Form 10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Stewart
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  June 13, 2003





                                                       /s/ WILLIAM E. ROWE
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                        William E. Rowe
                                                         President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                       /s/ KENNETH C. BUDDE
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                         Kenneth C. Budde
                                                   Executive Vice President and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
No. 67698.

#### Western European Import Co. and Heemsoth-Kerner Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 61/7030 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.