alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case Mo. 6,671.

#### HODGSON v. WOODHOUSE.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 549.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1809.

Tp.ovee against Master op Vessel — When it Lies.

Trover will not lie against the master of a vessel for the cargo, unless the freight is paid, or tendered, or the payment waived; nor if the goods were lost so that they did not come to the use of .the defendant.

Trover against the master of a vessel for cheese and porter.

Mr. Taylor, for defendant,

prayed the court to instruct the jury, that the plaintiff could not recover, unless he had paid or tendered the freight; — which instruction THE COURT gave with a proviso that the jury should not be satisfied by the evidence that the defend’ant had waived the precedent condition of payment. Ross v. Johnson, 5 Burrows, 2825.

THE COURT,

also, at the prayer of the defendant, instructed the jury, that if they should be of opinion that the cheese was eaten by the rats, or otherwise lost, so that it did not come to the use of the defendant, the plaintiff cannot recover in this form.
A90A0214.

#### REED v. THE STATE.

(390 SE2d 436)

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Dwight Reed appeals from his conviction of aggravated child molestation. The victim was his brother’s nine-year-old stepson.

1. Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the guilty verdict.

The child reported the molestation to his school counselor after viewing the film “Good Touch, Bad Touch.” The proper authorities were notified by the principal and the child was interviewed by law enforcement officers and social workers. A physician who examined the child testified that his examination revealed a sphincter muscle tone change consistent with anal intercourse. After he was arrested, appellant waived his right to counsel and consented to a polygraph test. When the results revealed that he was being deceptive, he made a partial oral admission of guilt. He was again advised of his *Miranda*rights and waived them. His statement was reduced to writing, read aloud to him, and he signed it.

The credibility of witnesses is a matter for jury resolution. *Redd v. State,*154 Ga. App. 373 (268 SE2d 423) (1980). The evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. The trial court held a *Jackson v. Denno*hearing prior to trial and admitted appellant’s confession into evidence after finding that it was freely and voluntarily given. The officers who took the statement testified as to the conditions under which it was taken. Reed admitted signing the waiver certificate and consent to the polygraph examination, but denied signing the confession. He claims that his signature was a forgery because three letters in his first name were written in cursive and he normally prints his signature. By comparing his acknowledged signatures with the contested one, the evidence was sufficient for the trial court to find enough similarity to conclude that the signature was valid. This issue was resolved against Reed by the trial judge at the *Jackson v. Denno*hearing and later by the jury. We find no error in the trial court’s finding that the statement was freely and voluntarily given. See *Mungin v. State,*183 Ga. App. 290, 291 (358 *318SE2d 673) (1987).

Decided January 24, 1990.

*Bates, Kelehear & Starr, Harlan M. Starr,*for appellant.

*Jack O. Partain III, District Attorney, David T. Blackburn, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1











Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,


18 U.S.C. § 1350





I, Louis J. Brothers, Chief Executive Officer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:





1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 as amended by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 thereto on Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date: April 16, 2012


By:  /s/ Louis J. Brothers


Louis J. Brothers


President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Chairman of the Board








The information contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
Exhibit 99.4  -  Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders as of December 31, 2005
Structured Asset Investment Loan TrustMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE2
Beginning
Principal
Interest
Ending
Class
Balance
Distributed
Distributed
Balance
A1
346,051,972.78
15,696,966.55
6,470,911.69
330,355,006.23
A2
190,263,000.00
0.00
3,353,451.43
190,263,000.00
A3
73,719,000.00
0.00
1,337,411.12
73,719,000.00
M1
30,735,000.00
0.00
570,827.92
30,735,000.00
M2
24,420,000.00
0.00
455,644.98
24,420,000.00
M3
15,157,000.00
0.00
284,114.81
15,157,000.00
M4
13,894,000.00
0.00
268,216.91
13,894,000.00
M5
11,789,000.00
0.00
229,103.67
11,789,000.00
M6
10,105,000.00
0.00
198,552.72
10,105,000.00
M7
7,578,000.00
0.00
167,497.49
7,578,000.00
M8
7,578,000.00
0.00
172,391.61
7,578,000.00
M9
9,263,000.00
0.00
230,664.78
9,263,000.00
M10
8,842,000.00
0.00
241,119.50
8,842,000.00
B1
6,315,000.00
0.00
172,208.73
6,315,000.00
B2
5,894,000.00
0.00
160,728.15
5,894,000.00
B3
5,473,000.00
0.00
149,247.57
5,473,000.00
X
4,210,905.68
0.00
6,265,886.81
4,210,905.68
P
100.00
0.00
1,377,573.99
100.00
R
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 384

Recognizing the Boy Scouts of America for the public service it performs

through its contributions to the lives of the Nation’s boys and young men.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. BUYER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Boy Scouts of America for the public service

it performs through its contributions to the lives of the

Nation’s boys and young men.

Whereas scouting is the largest voluntary youth movement in

the world, with a membership totaling more than 25 million;

Whereas the Boy Scouts of America is an organization that

was incorporated on February 8, 1910, and recognized by

Federal charter on June 15, 1916, to provide an educational program for boys and young men to build character, train in the responsibilities of participatory citizenship, and develop personal fitness;

Whereas the Boy Scouts of America teaches the core values

of duty to God and country, personal honor, respect for

the beliefs of others, volunteerism, and interdependence
2

•HCON 384 IH

with the environment, principles which are conducive to

good character, citizenship, and health;

Whereas the Boy Scouts of America is a model for inclusiveness, with 6 million boys and young men from every ethnic, religious, and economic background, including those

with disabilities and special needs, participating in scouting programs across the United States;

Whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that the Boy Scouts

of America, as a private, voluntary, nonbusiness organization, has the right to set its own standards for membership and leadership; and

Whereas by promoting and fostering those qualities in America’s youth which form the strong foundation of this Nation, the Boy Scouts of America has made a contribution

of immeasurable value to the welfare of the entire Nation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes the Boy Scouts of

3 America and expresses appreciation for the public service

4 it performs through its contributions to the lives of the

5 Nation’s boys and young men.

Æ
### -- Doug -* 1



### - - 

# 1 Fw:Follow

### upinformation 

### Karrna <>Connor Frances W~cher, W~enke Tax 081101201106 17AM Douglas Ito, Chlef

, .. 

### .... : Air Quality and Transportation Planning Branch KarinaOConnorlR9IUSEPNUS Air Resources Board jc;. FrancesWicher/R9/USEPA/US@EPA,WienkeTaxlR9/USEPNUS@EPA 

### -. (916) 322-0285 $..!I <>,. .

: ,.,; This message hasbeenforwarded- 

### dito@arb.ca.gov<mailto:dito@arb.ca.gov> 2 attachments

SJVSIPUpdateChart080911.docxSCSIP UpdateChart080911.docx

Fyi Karina O'Connor (775) 434-8176 oconnor.karina@epa.gov

-----Forwarded by Karina OConnor/R9/USEPA/US on 08/10/2011 06:17AM -----

----------------------- --------

~ To: Karina OConnor/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Elizabeth Adams/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Rudolph Kapichak/PA/USEPAIUS@EPA

From: "Ito, Doug@ARBm <dito@arb.ca.gov> Date: 08/09/2011 05:16PM Cc: "Llndberg, Jeff@ARBn <jllndber@arb.ca.gov>, "Murchison, Linda@ARBU <lmurchis@arb.ca.gov>, "Karperos, Kurt@ARBW <kkarpero@arb.ca.gov>, "Terry, Lynn@ARBP <lterry@arb.ca.gov,, "Crow, Jason@ARBU <]crow@arb.ca.gov>, "Taylor, Jon@ARBU <jtaylor@arb.ca.gov>, "Magliano, Karen@ARBn <kmaglian@arb.ca.gov>

Subject: Follow up information

....................... .......................

Karina, Elizabeth, and Rudy, Thanks for the call this afternoon. Here are the updated tables providing the additional clarifications we discussed. In addition, as mentioned on the call, the quantified changes to SJV Rule 9310 (school buses) and SJV Rule 9410 (Employer based trip reduction) can be found individually in the line item adjustments included in the 2011 SIP Revision. The budget calculation in the 2007 SIP included two District rules, 9510 (Indirect Source Review) and 9310 (School Buses!, in the "Existing Local Measure Reduction'' line item. Since we removed the benefits from ISR, the ~updaredbudgets in the 2011 Revision (documented on pages C-6 through C-8) now only include District rule 9310 which was updated to reflect changes in the new truck model. The 2007 SIP budget calculation also identifled a "New/Proposed Measures - Local Reductions" line item which included the emission reductions from an employed-based trip redliction lomitment. That rule (Dlstrlct rule 9410 - Employer Baaed Trip Reduction) has now been adopted locally, so the updated budgets in the 2011 SIP Revision include the estimated emission reductions from the adopted rule (see tables on pages C-6 through C-8 "New/Proposed Measures - Local Reductions" line item). Regards,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-60223

Summary Calendar

_____________________

RICHARD BARRETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Department of Justice,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-264-BrN)

_________________________________________________________________

November 20, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Barrett, pro se, appeals the summary judgment denying

his request for attorney’s fees in his pro se Freedom of

Information Act action, 5 U.S.C. § 552, contending that the

district court concluded erroneously that there was no genuine

issue of material fact concerning entitlement to them. Pursuant to

our de novo review we AFFIRM the summary judgment for essentially

the reasons stated by the district court in its detailed and well-
- 2 -

reasoned opinion. Barrett v. United States, No. 3:95-CV-264-BrN

(S.D. Miss. March 17, 1997).

AFFIRMED
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 23, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00818-CV

DAVID WORK, Appellant

V.

PAMELA WORK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-04741

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Molberg

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s order granting a motion for partial summary 

judgment. The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as there does not appear to be a 

final judgment. At the Court’s request, the parties filed letter briefs addressing the jurisdictional 

issue.

Generally, appellate courts have jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that 

disposes of all parties and claims. See id. 

In appellee’s original petition for post-divorce division of property, she sought division of 

$67,295.64 and attorney’s fees. Appellant filed a counter-petition requesting his attorney’s fees 

as sanctions. Appellee filed a motion for partial summary judgment requesting that the trial 
–2–

court find that the $67,295.64 is an undivided community asset. The trial court granted the 

motion. The order does not state how the $67,295.64 will be divided and does not dispose of the 

parties’ claims for attorney’s fees. Nothing in appellant’s letter brief establishes this Court’s 

jurisdiction.

Because the division of the monetary asset and claims for attorney’s fees remain pending, 

the order is not final. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a).

190818F.P05

/Ken Molberg/

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID WORK, Appellant

No. 05-19-00818-CV V.

PAMELA WORK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-04741.

Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. 

Justices Myers and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee PAMELA WORK recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellant DAVID WORK.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of August, 2019.
Before the Third Division,

December 20, 1966

No. P66/380.

#### S *&*F Trading, Inc., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/13203, etc. (Honolulu).

Bichardson, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the f oregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-10149, 333-10153, 333-10157, 333-11037 and 333-13187 of The Dial Corporation
on Form S-8 of our report dated January 22, 1998, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Dial Corporation for the year ended January 3, 1998.
 
                                          /s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
 
                                       45
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 30,284

10 DANA EICHER,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY

13 Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellee

17 Dana Eicher

18 Grants, NM

19 Pro se Appellant

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION

21 CASTILLO, Judge.
2

1 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed,

3 and the time for doing so has expired.

4 Dismissed.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 ___________________________________

7 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 __________________________________

10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

11 __________________________________

12 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge
APPENDIX D

Element (D)(i)(I) Support Documents
(This page left intentionally blank.)
D - 1

APPENDIX D

Element (D)(i)(I) Support Documents

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency map of nonattainment areas as of July 2012:

Source: http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/map/map8hr_2008.pdf
D - 2

Map of airport locations where wind rose plots were created:
D - 3

Reno, Nevada wind rose plot, 2003-2011:
D - 4

Las Vegas, Nevada wind rose plot, 2003-2011:
D - 5

Phoenix, Arizona wind rose plot, 2003-2011:
D - 6

Sacramento, California wind rose plot, 2003-2011:
D - 7

Edwards Air Force Base, California wind rose plot, 2005-2011:
From: Krichevsky, Alex@ARB

To: Sutkus, Carol@ARB

Cc: Vanderspek, Sylvia@ARB; Guzzetta, Michael@ARB

Subject: FW: Feather River AQMD - SIP Submittal - Rule 3.8 - Final

Date: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:45:06 AM

Attachments: SIP checklist_3.8.docx

SIP eval form_3.8.doc

Rule 3.8 (Final).pdf

Rule 3.8 Resolution.pdf

Rule 3.8 Public Notice.pdf

Rule 3.8 Comments.pdf

Rule 3.8 Staff Report (Final).pdf

Rule 3.8 LO-SO.docx

From: Tim Mitro [mailto:tmitro@fraqmd.org] 

Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:44 AM

To: Krichevsky, Alex@ARB

Cc: Christopher D. Brown AICP; Sondra Spaethe

Subject: Feather River AQMD - SIP Submittal - Rule 3.8 - Final

Alex,

On June 2, 2014, the Feather River AQMD’s Board of Directors approved the amendments

to District Rule 3.8. The District is requesting to submit this rule revision into the SIP. Please

find attached the necessary documents for Feather River AQMD’s inclusion of Regulation III,

Rule 3.8 – Gasoline Dispensing Facilities into the SIP.

This e-mail contains the following documents:

- SIP Checklist 3.8

- SIP eval form 3.8

- Rule 3.8 (Final)

- Rule 3.8 Resolution

- Rule 3.8 Public Notice

- Rule 3.8 Comments

- Rule 3.8 Staff Report (Final)

- Rule 3.8 Lineout-Strikeout

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Timothy Mitro

Feather River AQMD - Air Quality Engineer

(530) 634-7659 ext. 208

1007 Live Oak Blvd, Suite B-3

Yuba City, CA 95991

www.fraqmd.org
Exhibit 10.10


                                 October 1, 1999





Mr. Clarke H. Bailey
Hudson River Capital, LLC
667 Madison Avenue, 25th Floor
New York, NY 10021

Dear Clarke:

         At the request of the Board of Directors of Glenayre Technologies, Inc.
("Glenayre"), you have agreed to become Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Glenayre for a one-year period from October 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000
(the "Term"), on the following terms and conditions:

                  1. Beginning October 1, 1999 and for the remainder of the Term
         you will be paid a salary at the annual rate of $200,000, payable in
         accordance with Glenayre's normal payroll practices. This salary will
         be in lieu of any and all other fees paid to members of the Board of
         Directors.

                  2. A recommendation will be made to the Plan Administration
         Committee of the Board of Directors of Glenayre that you be awarded
         fully vested options on October 1, 1999 to purchase 100,000 shares of
         Glenayre common stock at an exercise price equal to the closing sale
         price as of such date and on such other terms and conditions as the
         Plan Administration Committee shall approve.

                  3. The letter agreement between Glenayre and you dated April
         18, 1999 shall terminate effective as of September 30, 1999, except
         that you will continue to be eligible through October 18, 1999 for the
         bonus described in Paragraph 2 of such letter agreement.

                  4. As Chairman of the Board, you will act in the capacity of
         an employee of Glenayre and will be entitled to participate in all
         employee benefits to the extent you qualify under the eligibility
         requirements of the particular benefit plan or program. You will not,


<PAGE>

Mr. Clarke H. Bailey
October 1, 1999
Page 2


         however, be eligible to participate in Glenayre's MBO bonus program.

                  5. Glenayre will reimburse you for all reasonable expenses
         incurred personally by you in connection with your duties as Chairman
         of the Board.

         If the foregoing terms are acceptable to you, please sign in the space
provided below.

                                                     GLENAYRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                                     By: /s/ Eric Doggett
                                                        -----------------
                                                     Name: Eric Doggett
                                                          -------------
                                                     Title: President and CEO
                                                           ------------------





Accepted and Agreed to:

 /s/ C. H. Bailey
-----------------
Clarke H. Bailey
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          92,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,806
<PP&E>                                       1,162,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,292,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,409
<BONDS>                                        566,481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           423
<OTHER-SE>                                     541,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,292,655
<SALES>                                        328,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               355,008
<CGS>                                          113,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,313
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,560)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>