alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12(A)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             26 WEEKS
                                               ENDED
                                             12/28/2002                                   YEAR ENDED
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)                (UNAUDITED)         2002          2001         2000         1999          1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>               <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>            <C>
Fixed Charges

 Interest and amortization of debt issuance
   costs on all indebtedness                  $ 20,410         $ 43,357      $  39,043    $ 31,102      $ 15,864     $  7,336

 Add interest element implicit in rentals        1,831            3,040          3,724       1,923         1,158          521
                                              -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total fixed charges                       $ 22,241         $ 46,397      $  42,767    $ 33,025      $ 17,022     $  7,857

Income
 Income before income taxes                   $ 42,707         $ 44,541      $  73,846    $146,903      $ 53,863     $ 32,186
 Add fixed charges                              22,241           46,367         42,767      33,025        17,022        7,857
                                              -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Income before fixed charges and income
   taxes                                      $ 64,948         $ 90,908      $ 116,613    $179,928      $ 70,885     $ 40,043
                                              ===============================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                2.92             1.96           2.73        5.45          4.16         5.10
</TABLE>

                                       31
No. 62912.

#### Franken Trimming Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 261549-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58343.

protests 129428-K, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the Western white spruce lumber the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1538), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.
# L_2022275EN.01007201.xml

| 25.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 275/72

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2022/2051

of 24 October 2022

amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi.

| (2) | On the basis of a review by the Council of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 October 2023 and three persons should be removed from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures, as set out in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review by the Council of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 October 2023 and three persons should be removed from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures, as set out in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 is amended as follows:

| (1) | the second paragraph of Article 6 is replaced by the following:

  ‘This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2023.’; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

the second paragraph of Article 6 is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2023.’;

| (2) | the Annex is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

the Annex is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 24 October 2022.

For the Council

The President

A. HUBÁČKOVÁ

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 of 1 October 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi (OJ L 257, 2.10.2015, p. 37).

1

---

ANNEX

In the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 (List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Articles 1 and 2), the following entries are deleted:

| — | entry 1 (Godefroid BIZIMANA), |
| --- | --- |

—

entry 1 (Godefroid BIZIMANA),

| — | entry 2 (Gervais NDIRAKOBUCA alias NDAKUGARIKA), |
| --- | --- |

—

entry 2 (Gervais NDIRAKOBUCA alias NDAKUGARIKA),

| — | entry 4 (Léonard NGENDAKUMANA). |
| --- | --- |

—

entry 4 (Léonard NGENDAKUMANA).

---
No. 62884.

#### Clarence S. Holmes *v.*United States,

protests 233271-K and 237028-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh or frozen boneless pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, C. Boyd Clarke,certify that:

    1.   Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Neose Technologies, Inc.

          2.          Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3.          Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

          4.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                       a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

                       b)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

                       c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

                       a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to

----
Mineral Resources On-Line Spatial Data

Mineral Resources > Online Spatial Data > Geology > by state > Texas

Woodbine Formation

Woodbine Formation

State Texas

Name Woodbine Formation

Geologic age Phanerozoic | Mesozoic | Cretaceous-Late [Gulfian]

Original map label Kwb

Comments NE Texas. Texarkana Sheet (1966) Woodbine 

Formation--various interlensing sequence of nonmarine, 

brackish-water, and marine beds of sand, clay, 

sandstone, and shale 350-600 ft thick. Woodbine fossils 

include ammonites, gastropods, pelecypods, 

brachiopods, and foraminifers. Contains volcanic sand 

and tuff, coarse grained, crossbedded, dk green and

olive green; fossil plants and a few marine megafossils; 

thickness 500 ft, thins eastward.

Primary rock type shale

Secondary rock type sand

Other rock types clay or mud; limestone; coal; tuff

Lithologic constituents Major 

Sedimentary > Clastic > Mixed-clastic > SandstoneMudstone (Tuffaceous)

Map references Bureau of Economic Geology, 1992, Geologic Map of Texas: 

University of Texas at Austin, Virgil E. Barnes, project supervisor, 

Hartmann, B.M. and Scranton, D.F., cartography, scale 1:500,000 

Unit references Bureau of Economic Geology, 1966, Texarkana Sheet, Geologic 

Atlas of Texas, University of Texas, Bureau of Economic Geology, 

scale 1:250,000. 

Geographic coverage Cooke - Denton - Fannin - Grayson - Hill - Johnson - Lamar - 

McLennan - Tarrant

Show this information as [XML] - [JSON]

Woodbine Formation (TXKwb;0) Page 1 of 2

http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/sgmc-unit.php?unit=TXKwb%3B0 10/21/2014
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey

URL: http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/sgmc-unit.php?unit=TXKwb;0

Page Contact Information: Peter Schweitzer

Woodbine Formation (TXKwb;0) Page 2 of 2

http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/sgmc-unit.php?unit=TXKwb%3B0 10/21/2014
No. 66167.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 267859-K (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55063.

#### New York Auction Co. *v.*United States,

protest 935587-G (New York).

*319Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
No. 62917.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 277710-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In .accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. E. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Con. Res. 47 Agreed to April 14, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL

GROUNDS.

The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereafter

in this concurrent resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’) shall

be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races,

on the Capitol Grounds on July 10, 1999, or on such other date

as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee

on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

The event to be carried out under this concurrent resolution

shall be free of admission charge to the public and arranged not

to interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be

prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

Board; except that the Association shall assume full responsibility

for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated

with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

For the purposes of this concurrent resolution, the Association

is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the

approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment as may

be required for the event to be carried out under this concurrent

resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board

are authorized to make any such additional arrangements that

may be required to carry out the event under this concurrent

resolution.
H. Con. Res. 47—2

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, and

solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions

applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to

be carried out under this concurrent resolution.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45504

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

MORGAN LAU ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: October 5, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Elmore County. Hon. Jonathan Medema , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen
years, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly A. Coster

, Deput y Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Morgan Lau pled guilty to sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years . Idaho
Code § 18

- 1506(1)(b) and/or (d) . The district court sentenced Lau to a unified term of ten years
with three years dete rminate

. Lau appeals contending that the district court abused its discretion
by declining to grant probat ion or consider retaining jurisdiction

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
The primary purpose of the retained jurisdiction program is to enable the trial court to
obtain additional information regarding the defendant’s rehabilitative potential and suitability for
probation, and probation is the ultimate objective of a defendant who is on retained jurisdi ction.
State v. Chapel , 107 Idaho 193, 687 P.2d 583 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565,
567, 650 P.2d 707, 709 (Ct. App. 1982). There can be no abuse of discretion in a trial court’s
refusal to retain jurisdiction if the court already has s ufficient information upon which to
conclude that the defendant is not a suitable candidate for probation. State v. Beebe , 113 Idaho
977, 979, 751 P.2d 673, 675 (Ct. App. 1988); Toohill , 103 Idaho at 567, 650 P.2d at 709. Based
upon the information that was before the district court at the time of sentencing, we hold that the
district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to retain jurisdiction.
Therefore, Lau ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
September 22, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

YUJIE REN, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00035-CV V.

ANU RESOURCES, LLC, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Anu 

Resources, LLC, signed January 4, 2016, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Yujie Ren, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Roberts, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David E. Roberts                 
|    |  | David E. Roberts                     
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

March 10, 2016
1 Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:32 PM To: Ogulei, David Subject: FW: Xact questions

From: Bivins, Dan
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:15 PM
To: John Cooper
Cc: Garnett, Kim Subject: Xact questions

John,

We are answering some comments from a facility on a permit submittal. Could you comment on the follow ing? Thanks!
Dan p.s. – there may be more questions if that’s ok?

Comment : EPA’s statement that “Multi-metals CEMS are comme rcially available and have been demonstrated to be reliable for measuring mercury and other meta l emissions from hazardous waste combustors” (State ment of Basis at 22) is incorrect or misleading. When th e Statement of Basis was written, the Xact was offe red by Pall Corporation. This is no longer correct. Pall n o longer manufactures and sells the Xact unit. The marketing rights to the Xact have reverted to Cooper Environm ental Services. It should also be noted that this i nstrument is not an instrument that is carried in inventory. If a facility wanted to purchase an Xact unit, Coop er Environmental Services has indicated that it would take them at least six months to build it. This is the time to build the instrument itself and does not include ti me to develop the site-specific sampling train or t he time to develop the software interface between the instrume nt and the facility’s control systems. The software development process (custom software for that site) would take several months after the instrument was installed. Only one Xact unit has been installed an d operated for an extended period of time at only o ne hazardous waste combustor, the combustor at Evoniks Tippecanoe Laboratories. Due to frequent maintenan ce issues and equipment failure, that Xact unit is no longer operating. (CRWI 6-7)

Dan Bivins U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Measurement Technology Group 919-541-5244
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Catalyze 
Enabling Technologies, December 4, 2023, 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., National 
Institutes of Health, Rockledge I, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 
20892, which was published in the Federal Register on September 28, 
2023, FR Doc 2023-21890, 88 FR 68127.
    The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Catalyze Enabling Technologies meeting is being amended due to a 
change of the meeting date and time formats. The meeting will be held 
on December 5, 2023, from 12 p.m. to 2 p.m. This meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: October 18, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-23383 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 61163.

protest 311866-K (A) (New York).

#### Georgia Peanut Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the quantities of merchandise, *408which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.