alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 390 Agreed to October 19, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas Taiwan has dramatically improved its record on human

rights and routinely holds free and fair elections in a multiparty

system, as evidenced most recently by Taiwan’s second democratic

presidential election of March 18, 2000, in which Mr. Chen Shuibian was elected as president;

Whereas the 23,000,000 people on Taiwan are not represented

in the United Nations and many other international organizations, and their human rights as citizens of the world are therefore severely abridged;

Whereas Taiwan has in recent years repeatedly expressed its strong

desire to participate in the United Nations and other international

organizations;

Whereas Taiwan has much to contribute to the work and funding

of the United Nations and other international organizations;

Whereas the world community has reacted positively to Taiwan’s

desire for international participation, as shown by Taiwan’s membership in the Asian Development Bank and Taiwan’s admission

to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation group as a full member

and to the World Trade Organization as an observer;

Whereas the United States has supported Taiwan’s participation

in these bodies and, in the Taiwan Policy Review of September

1994, declared an intention of a stronger and more active policy

of support for Taiwan’s participation in appropriate international

organizations;

Whereas Public Law 106–137 required the Secretary of State to

submit a report to the Congress on administration efforts to

support Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, in

particular the World Health Organization; and

Whereas in such report the Secretary of State failed to endorse

Taiwan’s participation in international organizations and thereby

did not follow the spirit of the 1994 Taiwan Policy Review: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

(1) Taiwan and its 23,000,000 people deserve appropriate

meaningful participation in the United Nations and other international organizations such as the World Health Organization;

and

(2) the United States should fulfill the commitment it made

in the 1994 Taiwan Policy Review to more actively support
H. Con. Res. 390—2

Taiwan’s participation in appropriate international organizations.

Attest:

JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

By

Deputy Clerk.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Filed 12/18/14 P. v. Aguilar CA2/5 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION FIVE 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

HECTOR MANUEL AGUILAR, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 B254829 

 (Los Angeles County 

 Super. Ct. No. VA130811) 

 

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert J. 

Higa, Judge. Affirmed. 

 Steven A. Brody, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant. 

 Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney 

General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Scott A. Taryle and Paul M. 

Roadarmel, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. 
2

 A jury convicted defendant, Hector Manuel Aguilar, also known as Tomas 

Melendez Sanchez, of carrying concealed upon his person a dirk or dagger in violation of 

Penal Code section 21310. Defendant was sentenced to 365 days in the county jail. 

 Defendant has requested that we independently review the record of the trial 

court’s in camera hearing for review of peace officer personnel records. (People v. Mooc 

(2001) 26 Cal.4th 1216, 1228-1232; Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531, 

535.) On November 8, 2013, defendant filed a peace officer personnel record disclosure 

motion. The motion sought all misconduct complaints against the arresting officer. On 

December 17, 2013, the trial court conducted an in camera hearing and found there were 

no discloseable materials. We have reviewed the transcript of the in camera hearing. No 

abuse of discretion occurred. (People v. Myles (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1181, 1209; People v. 

Hughes (2002) 27 Cal.4th 287, 330.) 

The judgment is affirmed. 

 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

 TURNER, P.J. 

 We concur: 

 MOSK, J. 

 GOODMAN, J.

 

 Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant 

to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

September 9, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Green Drone Inspections, LLC Exemption Request 

Under Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Green Drone Inspections, LLC., an aerial video 

and photography service company and operator of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

(sUAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 

to allow commercial operation of the DJI Phantom Series, Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, 

and the Sensefly eBee within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, 

aerial photography and survey, data collection for industrial inspections including pipe 

line, power lines, wind turbines, solar farms, flare stack, and offshore platforms, and first 

responder/emergency management.

Green Drone Inspections, in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b),14 C.F.R. 61.23, 14 C.F.R. 61.101 

(e)(4) &(5),14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b), 14 C.F.R. 61.315(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a), 14 

C.F.R. 91.105, 14 C.F.R. 91.119(c), 14 C.F.R. 91.121, 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) (b), 14 

C.F.R. 91.405(a), 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1), 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 14 C.F.R. 

91.417(a) and (b). 

Green Drone Inspections has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its

petition because it would not set any precedent and because the relief requested is 

identical to numerous exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, Green Drone Inspections will be utilizing the same DJI Phantom Series, 

Leptron RDASS, Yuneec Q500, and the Sensefly eBee proven technologies the FAA has 

already accepted and approved for numerous other exemptions. Combined, the

comprehensive Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

Green Drone Inspection’s chosen products and the technology, should provide the 

support necessary to the FAA for a Summary Grant of Green Drone Inspection’s Section 

333 Petition and expedite the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #15-2005 (A) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                            |
| Sean P. McGrath                                |
| Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                             |
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 30453 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Dasmon Deshawn Franklin,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:19

- CR

- 123

- 1

Before **Jones, Clement,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dasmon
Deshawn Franklin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Franklin has not filed a response. We

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 3, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-30453 Document: 00515886379 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2021No. 20

- 30453

2 have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appel late review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See
**5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 20-30453 Document: 00515886379 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2021
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 371 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.371
                                    Agreed to September 15, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas 26 million Americans currently suffer the ravages of drug or 
  alcohol addiction;

Whereas 85 percent of all crimes are tied to drug or alcohol addiction;

Whereas American taxpayers incurred more than $150 billion in drug-
  related criminal and medical costs in 1997 alone--more than they 
  spent on education, transportation, agriculture, energy, space, and 
  foreign aid combined;

Whereas every dollar invested in drug and alcohol treatment yields 
  seven dollars in savings in health care costs, criminal justice 
  costs, and lost productivity costs from job absenteeism, injuries, 
  and subpar work performance;

Whereas treatment for addiction is as effective as treatments for other 
  chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes and high blood pressure;

Whereas adolescents who undergo addiction treatment report less use of 
  marijuana, less heavy drinking, and less criminal involvement;

Whereas other benefits of adolescent addiction treatment include better 
  psychological adjustment and improved school performance after 
  treatment;

Whereas a number of organizations and individuals dedicated to fighting 
  addiction and promoting treatment and recovery will recognize 
  September 2000 as National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month;

Whereas National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month celebrates 
  the tremendous strides taken by individuals who have undergone 
  successful treatment and recognizes those in the treatment field who 
  have dedicated their lives to helping people recover from addiction; 
  and

Whereas the 2000 national campaign focuses on supporting adolescents in 
  addiction treatment and recovery, embraces the theme of ``Recovering 
  Our Future: One Youth at a Time'', and seeks to increase awareness 
  about alcohol and drug addiction and to promote treatment and 
  recovery for adolescents and adults: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress supports the goals and ideas of National Alcohol and 
Drug Recovery Month.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.1.1
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                              OF CHEMED CORPORATION

         Chemed Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of March 7, 2003
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:

                  RESOLVED,That the Certificate of Incorporation of this
                           corporation be amended by changing Article I thereof
                           so that, as amended said Article shall be and read as
                           follows:

                           "The name of the corporation is Roto-Rooter, Inc."

         SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, an annual meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly
called and held on May 19, 2003 upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the
necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the
amendment.

         THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Chemed Corporation has caused this certificate
to be signed by its President and Chief Executive Officer and attested by its
Vice President and Secretary, this 19th day of May, 2003.


(Corporate Seal)

Attest:
<TABLE>
<S>                                        <C>

By: /s/ Naomi C. Dallob                    By:    /s/ Kevin J. McNamara
    -----------------------------------           -----------------------------------
    Naomi C. Dallob, Secretary                    Kevin J. McNamara
                                                  President & Chief Executive Officer
</TABLE>

                                       E-1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ 

)

LUIS IVAN POBLETE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 17-cv-02527 (APM)

)

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT )

OPPORTUNITIES TRUST, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of Plaintiff Luis Ivan Poblete’s Complaint 

and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, titled “Petition in Equity for Emergency Injunctive 

Relief” (“Complaint and TRO”). Plaintiff proceeds pro se. For the reasons set forth below, the 

court denies Plaintiff’s Complaint and TRO and sua sponte dismisses this action without prejudice 

for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. 

Plaintiff invokes diversity jurisdiction as the basis for subject-matter jurisdiction in this 

case. Compl. & TRO, ECF No. 1, ¶ 4. The federal diversity statute provides that “district courts 

shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum 

or value of $75,000 . . . and is between . . . citizens of different states.” 28 U.S.C. §1332 (emphasis 

added). For jurisdiction to exist under section 1332, there must be complete diversity between the 

parties, meaning “each defendant [must be] a citizen of a different state [than] each plaintiff.” 

Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365, 373 (1978). “The party seeking the 

exercise of diversity jurisdiction bears the burden of pleading the citizenship of each and every 
2

party to the action.” Loughlin v. United States, 393 F.3d 155, 171 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (quoting 

Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 792 (D.C. Cir. 1983)). 

Plaintiff has failed to meet this burden here. It is apparent from the face of the Complaint 

that complete diversity does not exist. The caption of Plaintiff’s pleading shows that Plaintiff and 

one of the Defendants, Stephen Hassler, are both residents of Washington, D.C. To be sure, a 

person is a “citizen of the State” in which he is domiciled, and physical presence is only one of the 

two factors courts use to determine domicile. See Prakash v. Am. Univ., 727 F.2d 1174, 1180 

(D.C. Cir. 1984). Plaintiff, however, bears the burden of pleading citizenship and has not pled 

facts establishing that either he or Mr. Hassler is a citizen of any state other than Washington, D.C.

The court therefore finds it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this matter. Accordingly, the 

court dismisses Plaintiff’s Complaint and TRO sua sponte. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); Evans v. 

Suter, No. 09-5242, 2010 WL 1632902, at *1 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (“[A] district court 

may dismiss a complaint sua sponte prior to service on the defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(h)(3) when, as here, it is evident that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.”). 

Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the court denies Plaintiff’s Complaint and TRO and 

dismisses this action without prejudice. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is 

issued separately.

_____________________________

Date: November 22, 2017 Amit P. Mehta

United States District Judge
H. J. Res. 28

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Joint Resolution

Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. as a citizen regent

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance

with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress,

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Wesley S.

Williams, Jr. of the District of Columbia on April 11, 1999, is

filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 6 years,

effective April 12, 1999.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 292 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 292

 Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding tactile currency for the 
                      blind and visually impaired.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              October 8 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

    Ms. Moseley-Braun submitted the following resolution; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding tactile currency for the 
                      blind and visually impaired.

Whereas currency is used by virtually everyone in everyday life, including blind 
        and visually impaired persons;
Whereas the Federal reserve notes of the United States are inaccessible to 
        individuals with visual disabilities;
Whereas the Americans with Disabilities Act enhances the economic independence 
        and equal opportunity for full participation in society for individuals 
        with disabilities;
Whereas most blind and visually impaired persons are therefore required to rely 
        upon others to determine denominations of such currency;
Whereas this constitutes a serious impediment to independence in everyday 
        living;
Whereas electronic means of bill identification will always be more fallible 
        than purely tactile means;
Whereas tactile currency already exists in 23 countries worldwide; and
Whereas the currency of the United States is presently undergoing significant 
        changes for security purposes: Now, therefore, be it
            Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) endorses the efforts recently begun by the Bureau of Engraving 
        and Printing to upgrade the currency for security reasons; and
            (2) strongly encourages the Secretary of the Treasury and the Bureau 
        of Engraving and Printing to incorporate cost-effective, tactile 
        features into the design changes, thereby including the blind and 
        visually impaired community in independent currency usage.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
 
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
 DATE:  December 10, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Byron L. BergrenByron L. BergrenPresident and Chief
Executive Officer By:
    /s/ Keith E. PlowmanKeith E. PlowmanExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended January 31, 2011, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stewart Enterprises,
Inc.
    /s/   THOMAS J. CRAWFORDThomas J. CrawfordPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/    THOMAS M. KITCHENThomas M. KitchenSenior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer -57-