alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         113,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,283,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,577,340
<PP&E>                                      10,952,631
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,771,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,517,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,666,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,150
<COMMON>                                       104,565
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,121,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,517,345
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,502,654
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,420,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                834,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,486
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   815,132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        



</TABLE>
Case No. 10,343.

#### NORTHWESTERN UNION PACKET CO. v. HANNIBAL.

[4 Dill. 18. note.] 1

Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri.

1876.

Wharfage Dues.

[See Case No. 10,340.]

[This tvas an action against the city of Hannibal to recover back wharfage dues. See Gases Nos. 10.342, 10,344, and 10,345.]

Duncan *&*Davidson, for plaintiff.

Thomas H. Bacon, for defendant.

Before DILLON, Circuit. Judge, and TREAT, District Judge.

1

 [Reported by Hon. John F. Dillon. Circuit Judge, aud here reprinted by permission.]

TREAT. District Judge.

The ordinance of the city of Hannibal provides for wharfage, at rates to be determined by tonnage, for every landing of a steamboat, etc., and by the time the steamboat continues at the landing. The remarks made in the suit against the city of St. Louis cover this case. There is a doubtful provision in the ordinance, perhaps, concerning the anchoring at the landing for barges, etc., but no question in this case-arises under that provision.
A89A1818.

#### McMICHAEL v. THE STATE.

(390 SE2d 120)

Decided January 12, 1990.

*J. Tracy Ward,*for appellant.

*Jack O. Partain III, District Attorney, Todd L. Ray, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Pope, Judge.

We have examined the record in this case in light of defendant’s enumeration of error claiming that the trial court erred in denying his extraordinary motion for new trial on the ground that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at the trial of the case. Counsel may, as defendant contends, have inadequately prepared for trial by failing to consult with the defendant about the trial of the case until the evening before the trial commenced and by failing to call certain witnesses identified by the defendant.* However, under the facts of this case, the possible ineffectiveness of counsel does not provide a ground for retrial. Defendant’s sole defense to the charge was that he acted in self-defense. Defendant testified that he repeatedly cut the victim with a knife in response to her striking him twice with a stick which broke on the second blow. According to Georgia law, “[a] person is justified in . . . using force against another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes that such threat or force is necessary to defend himself . . . against such other’s imminent use of unlawful force. . . .” OCGA § 16-3-21 (a). Whether the circumstances are such to justify the defendant’s response is a question for the jury. *Anderson v. State,*245 Ga. 619 (1) (266 SE2d 221) (1980). However, under the facts of this case, regardless of what the testimony of other witnesses might have been, defendant’s own testimony showed his response was not justified under the self-defense rule and, thus, no ground for new trial exists. We hold the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for this and other reasons adequately and fully set forth in thé trial court’s order.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.*

*

 We note that defendant’s trial counsel was subsequently disbarred for wilful abandonment of a client’s legal interest. *In the Matter of Rodney H. Roberts,*258 Ga. 155 (366 SE2d 679) (1988).
{"agency":"FERC","generated":"2014-04-25 20:07:55","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FERC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["33"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["28"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["13"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q2"}
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **AMERICAN
        TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc.
        (the
        Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
        E.
        Durkin, III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
        Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
        staff
        upon request.
  Date:
        June 23, 2008
  /s/
                  Thomas E. Durkin, IIIPresident
                (Principal
                  Executive and Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.(a).1

                                     CONSENT
                                   BY AUDITOR



        The undersigned hereby consent to: (i) the inclusion and use of our
opinions with respect to Yarc Systems Corporation, Inc., in the Registration
Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Yarc Systems
Corporation, Inc., and (ii) the references to us in the Registration Statement.


                                            Barry Glasser & Company


Date: March 13, 2000                        By: /s/ BARRY GLASSER
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Barry Glasser
H. Con. Res. 405 Agreed to September 22, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representatives, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 4919) to amend the Foreign Assistance

Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act to make improvements

to certain defense and security assistance provisions under those

Acts, to authorize the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign

countries, and for other purposes, shall make the following corrections:

(1) On page 34, line 1, insert ‘‘on a grant basis’’ after

‘‘available’’.

(2) On page 34, line 11, strike ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and insert

‘‘subsection (b)(1) and paragraph (1) of this subsection’’.

(3) On page 36, line 19, insert ‘‘on a grant basis’’ after

‘‘available’’.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
No. 64706.

#### Cavalier Shipping Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/9078 and 59/21346 (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the collector converted the currency of the invoices into United States dollars at the official rate of exchange, as certified by the Federal Reserve bank, rather than the free rate of exchange certified for the dates of exportation, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                            CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, President of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR10;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual  compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 30, 2006

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     President
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.81
                                        Agreed to April 19, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on April 23, 1999, for a ceremony in honor of the 50th Anniversary of 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and welcoming the three 
newest members of NATO, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of 
Hungary, and the Czech Republic, into NATO. Physical preparations for 
the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 
the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Before the Third Division,

September 5, 1952

No. 56848.

#### Fishery Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 182953-K (New York).

*368Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar to that involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of 190 cartons of frozen fish, was missing and was not in fact landed, imported, nor received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon said 190 cartons of frozen fish reported by the inspector as not found at the time of landing. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 50812.

#### Protests 91552-K, etc., of Cisco, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# L_2022184EN.01000501.xml

| 11.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 184/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 184/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/1182

of 4 July 2022

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Derecske alma’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Derecske alma’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Derecske alma’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Derecske alma’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Derecske alma’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Derecske alma’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 July 2022.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 115, 11.3.2022, p. 18.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
No. 55070.

#### Jos. Tulchinsky *v.*United States,

protests 133669-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Slide 1

Winter 2013-14 

Energy Market Assessment

Item No. A-5

October 17, 2013
Slide 2

Seasonal Outlook

 Conditions look positive going into the 

winter season

• Moderate natural gas and power prices 

• Natural gas storage inventories are adequate, 

although lower than last year’s record

• Growing natural gas production 

 Regional Assessment

• New England continues to be an area of focus

Good morning. Today, I will highlight key findings from the Winter 2013-2014 Energy Market 

Assessment. The full presentation is posted on the Commission’s website. 

The outlook is generally positive. Nationally, natural gas prices are up 40-50% from last year, 

but remain below historic highs. Natural gas and power futures prices for the winter are 

comparable to last year, except in New England. 

Natural gas storage is more than adequate for a normal winter, and gas production continues to 

grow, particularly in the Northeast. We anticipate localized price spikes in New England during 

periods of high demand, due to ongoing constraints. 
Slide 3

ISO-NE Winter Electricity 

Prices Correlate Strongly 

with Gas Prices

0

50

100

150

0 10 20

Monthly Average 

DA Electricity 

Price ($/MWh)

Monthly Average DA Gas Index 

($/MMBtu) Source: ICE and ISO-NE 

prices via Energy Velocity

Feb 

2013

Last winter, restrictions at key compressor stations on Algonquin pipeline increased, limiting the 

interruptible transportation capacity available. On high demand days, curtailments to 

interruptible customers were especially likely. 

Such constraints result in natural gas price spikes in New England, and because natural gas is the 

marginal price-setting fuel during most hours for generating electricity, this led to power price 

spikes. Last winter, New England’s average power prices for February were higher than any 

prior month in ISO-NE history. The graph shows the strong correlation between monthly 

average electricity and natural gas prices during the last 5 winters. 

Looking forward to this winter, a customer in New England can purchase natural gas for delivery 

in January and February at almost $12/MMBtu, almost double the price at this time last year. 

Winter electricity peak futures prices are $100/MWh, 52% higher than last winter.

This concludes the Winter Assessment highlights.
#### Hayk AVAKIMYAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73308.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*594Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Hayk Avakimyan, Law Offices of Asbet A. Issakhanian, Glendale, CA, pro se.

District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ann Carroll Varnon, Esq., Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hayk Avakimyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen proceedings based on new evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Konstantinova v. INS,*195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999). We review due process claims de novo. *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

*595The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Avakimyan’s motion to reopen because Avakimyan failed to show that his passport was unavailable at the time of his merits hearing. *See INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992) (holding that a motion to reopen may be denied for failure to introduce previously unavailable evidence). The IJ granted Avakimyan two continuances totaling over one year so that Avakimyan could obtain identity documents and Avakimyan could not provide a consistent explanation for his inability to produce any identity documents within that period of time.

Avakimyan cannot show that he was prejudiced by the agency’s failure to provide a transcript of his removal proceedings because he requested the transcript in order to challenge the IJ’s underlying decision, but his appeal was only timely as to the IJ’s denial of the motion to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b) (providing that a notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 calendar days after the mailing of an IJ’s written decision); *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (holding that to prevail on a due process challenge an alien must show error and substantial prejudice).

Avakimyan’s due process challenge to streamlining is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849-51 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.