alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Robert D. Parks, the Chief Executive Officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/____________________________________

Name: Robert D. Parks

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 2, 2002
DPN



Exhibit 4.2



DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

US$5,709.00



In consideration of receiving a loan of US$5,709.00, the undersigned Manu Forti Group Inc., of 3990 Warren Way, Reno, Nevada, USA, 89509, does hereby PROMISE TO PAY to Steve McMannaman of Maison Houcarde, Gouze, Orthez, France, 64300, the sum of US$5,709.00, without interest, payable on demand. 

The undersigned and each endorser hereof waives demand and presentment for payment, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, protest and notice of this Promissory Note.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 22nd day of July, 2003.


	
/s/ "Tina Miller"
	
/s/ "Gordon Samson"

	
Tina Miller
	
Gordon Samson

	
Signature of Witness
	
Manu Forti Group Inc.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William A. Sanger, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of Emergency Medical Services L.P.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: May 2, 2011

 
| /s/   William A. Sanger |                                                      |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                   | William   A. Sanger                                       |   |
| Title:                  | Chief   Executive Officer                                 |   |
|                    | Emergency   Medical Services Corporation, as              |   |
|                    | general   partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P. |   |

 

----
Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Hotel Encanto de Las Cruces

705 South Telshor Blvd

Las Cruces, New Mexico 88011

575-522-4300

AGENDA

Thursday, September 8th

8:00 a.m. Registration

8:30-9:00 Welcome and Introductions

 Mark Joyce

Associate Director and Acting Designated Federal Officer

Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

US Environmental Protection Agency

 Cynthia Jones-Jackson

Acting Director

Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

US Environmental Protection Agency

 Diane Austin

Acting Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

 Sharon Thomas

Mayor Pro-Tem

Las Cruces, New Mexico

9:00-10:30 Economic Opportunities in the US-Mexico Border Region

 Pricilla C. Lucero

Executive Director

Southwest New Mexico Council of Governments
 Jo Anne Shelby

Plant Manager

Compass Manufacturing Services

 Linda Smrkovsky

Executive Director

Deming Luna County Economic Development, Inc.

10:30-10:45 Break

10:45-12:15 Community Impacts in the US-Mexico Border Region

 Jeremy Turner

Executive Director

New Mexico Renewable Energy Transmission Authority

 Karyn Stockdale

Vice President and Executive Director

New Mexico Audubon Society

 Clay Doyle

Vice President of Transmission and Distribution

El Paso Electric Company

12:15-12:45 Public Comments

12:45-2:00 Lunch

2:00-3:30 Discussion of 14th Report

3:30-3:45 Break

3:45-6:00 Discussion of 14th Report

6:00 p.m. Adjourn
Meeting Day 2

Friday, September 9th

8:30-9:00 Duncan Wood

Professor, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México

Senior Advisor for the Renewable Energy Initiative

Mexico Institute of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

9:00-9:30 Discussion of Next Meeting and Other Business

 Washington, DC – December 14-15

9:30-11:00 Discussion of 14th Report

11:00-11:15 Break

11:15-1:30 Discussion of 14th Report

1:30-2:00 Public Comments

2:00 p.m. Adjourn
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2023077EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 77/18 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2268 of 6 September 2021 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653 as regards the underpinning methodology and presentation of performance scenarios, the presentation of costs and the methodology for the calculation of summary cost indicators, the presentation and content of information on past performance and the presentation of costs by packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) offering a range of options for investment and alignment of the transitional arrangement for PRIIP manufacturers offering units of funds referred to in Article 32 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as underlying investment options with the prolonged transitional arrangement laid down in that Article

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 455 I of 20 December 2021](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2021_455_I_TOC)
)

On page 13, In Annex II, point (1):

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | point 13 is replaced by the following: | | | | --- | --- | | “13. | The VEV is given by: | Formula Where T is the length of the recommended holding period in years.”;’, |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | point 13 is replaced by the following: | | | | --- | --- | | “13. | The VEV is given by: | Formula Where T is the length of the recommended holding period in years.”;’; |

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(c) | point 17 is replaced by the following: | | | | --- | --- | | “17. | The VEV is given by: | Formula where T is the length of the recommended holding period in years. Only in cases where the product is called or cancelled before the end of the recommended holding period according to the simulation, the period in years until the call or cancellation is used in the calculation.”;’, |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(c) | point 17 is replaced by the following: | | | | --- | --- | | “17. | The VEV is given by: | Formula where T is the length of the recommended holding period in years. Only in cases where the product is called or cancelled before the end of the recommended holding period according to the simulation, the period in years until the call or cancellation is used in the calculation.”;’. |

---
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Grade 8Grade 12Grade 10Educational AttainmentDrug UseHispanic AmericansAdolescentsMarijuanaCocaineAcademic AchievementAcculturationParent RoleFamily RoleDecision Making

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

              CROSS-DEFAULT AND CROSS-COLLATERALIZATION AGREEMENT

August 1, 1997

Names and Addresses of the Parties:

                    KeyBank, National Association ("Lender")
                    SEATTLE METROPOLITAN COMMERCIAL BANKING CENTER
                    700 5th Avenue, 48th Floor
                    Seattle, WA 98104

                    NEW WEST EYEWORKS, INC.
                    2104 WEST SOUTHERN AVE.
                    TEMPE, AZ 85282

     Reference is hereby made to the following described credit arrangements
between Lender and the Borrowers (inclusive of all future amendments,
modifications, renewals or extensions thereof):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOAN NUMBER         NOTE DATE      NOTE FACE AMOUNT         MATURITY DATE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                 <C>            <C>                      <C>
387236-2009701        080197       $2,000,000.00               080102

387236-1009501        080197       $3,000,000.00               080199
</TABLE>

     It is agreed between Lender and the Borrower(s) that a default under one
of such credit arrangements is and shall be a default under all of such credit
arrangements. If any of such credit arrangements is payable on demand, without
regard to the occurrence of a specified event of default, then, (i) the
occurrence of a demand for payment under a credit arrangement payable on demand
is and shall be an event of default under a credit arrangement not payable on
demand and (ii) the occurrence of an event of default under any of such credit
arrangements shall be a basis for demanding payment of any of such credit
arrangements as are payable on demand.


     It is further agreed that all collateral which secures any of such credit
arrangements shall secure all of such credit arrangements.

KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION            NEW WEST EYEWORKS, INC.
                                        BY:
----------------------------            /s/ Barry Feld, CEO & President
          Authorized Officer            ---------------------------------

                                        /s/ Darius DiTallo, CFO
                                        ---------------------------------
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
WIRELESS INK CORPORA TION, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUB E, LLC, AND FACEBOOK, INC., Defendants

- Appellees,

AND

YOUTUBE, INC., AND MYSPACE, INC., Defendants.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WIRELESS INK CORPORA TION, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
FACEBOOK, INC. AND GOOGLE, INC., D efendants

- Appellees.

______________________
2013

- 1683,

- 1684

______________________Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District o f New York in No s . 11

- cv

- 01751 and 10

- cv

- 01841 , Judge P. Kevin Castel.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
J EREMY S. P ITCOCK , The Pitcock Law Group, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Of cou nsel on the brief w as P APOOL S. C HAU DH ARI , Chaudhari Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas.

J OHN C HRISTOPHER R OZENDAAL , Kellogg , Huber, Ha nsen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C.
, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant s- appellee s . With him on the bri ef for Facebook, Inc., were M ICHAEL E. J OFFRE and M ELANIE L. B OSTWICK

. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc.,

were H EIDI L. K EEFE , M ARK R. W EINSTEIN , and E LIZABETH L. S TAMESHKIN , Coole y LLP, of Palo Alto, California

. On the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were K EVIN X. M C G ANN , A ARON C HASE , and A DAM G AHTAN , White & Case LLP, of New York, New York

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :
P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
-                      -                        -  Về 
                      - Tin Tức & Đa Phương Tiện
                      -  Tin Tức & Đa Phương Tiện 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Blog 
                      -  Events 
                      -  Fact Sheets 
                      -  FEMA Live 
                      -  Mobile Products 
                      -  Thông Cáo Báo Chí 
                      -  Podcast 
                      -  Truyền Thông Xã Hội 
                      -  Về Chúng Tôi 
                      -  Báo Cáo & Dữ Liệu 
                      -  FEMA in Action 

          This page has not been translated into Tiếng Việt. Visit the Tiếng Việt page for resources in that language.        

# Newsletters

                            - English 

FEMA has several publicly available newsletters that we email to subscribers. The newsletters range from information for emergency managers to location or region specific material for the general public in that area.

## Subscribe

When you subscribe to a newsletter, we ask for your email address and then you select all the newsletters you would like to subscribe to from a list. Your email address will only be used to deliver the information you've requested and allows you to access your GovDelivery account. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.

You can change or cancel your subscriptions at any time.

## FEMA Bulletin

The FEMA Bulletin highlights the agency's recent and upcoming program and policy activities and announcements. You can subscribe to receive the FEMA Bulletin directly on Tuesday afternoons.

Return to top
A89A1914.

#### HOWARD v. THE STATE.

(390 SE2d 415)

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Howard was indicted, tried and convicted of the offenses of child molestation, aggravated child molestation, and statutory rape. On September 28, 1988, defendant was sentenced. His motion for new trial was timely filed, and on April 20, 1989, the trial court’s order granting his motion for new trial was entered. On May 1, 1989, the first day of the May term of the Superior Court of DeKalb County (OCGA § 15-6-3 (37)), the State filed its motion for reconsideration requesting an order setting aside the grant of defendant’s motion for new trial. After a lengthy hearing, the State’s motion for reconsideration was granted on June 9, 1989, and defendant’s motion for new trial was denied. Defendant’s notice of appeal was filed on June 22, 1989. Subsequently, on August 14, 1989, the trial court entered an order which granted defendant’s motion for new trial as to the offense of statutory rape only, and ordered “that the Defendant be granted an order of nolle prosequi” on the statutory rape charge. *Held:*

1. Defendant, acting pro se in the case sub judice, contends that the trial court erred in vacating its grant of his motion for new trial. Indeed, it is clear under this Court’s recent decision in *Pledger v. State,*193 Ga. App. 588 (388 SE2d 425) (1989), that the trial court’s power to reinstate the original judgment had expired at the end of the March term during which defendant’s motion for new trial had been granted. In the case sub judice, proceedings to revive the convictions *332were *not*begun during the term in which the order granting the new trial was entered. Compare *Bowen v. State,*239 Ga. 517, 518 (2) (238 SE2d 62). Defendant is entitled to a new trial.

Decided January 9, 1990

Rehearing denied January 26, 1990

*W. Edward Nethery,*for appellant.

Edgar W. Howard, *pro se.*

*Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Desiree L. Sutton, J. Thomas Morgan, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

2. Review of the transcript in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict reveals evidence sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of the offenses charged. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); *Daniels v. State,*192 Ga. App. 446 (1), 447 (385 SE2d 107).

3. Defendant’s remaining enumerations of error are either rendered moot by Division 1 of this opinion, deemed abandoned due to lack of argument or citation of authority in support thereof, or present nothing for appellate review since they attempt to raise issues which were not submitted to the trial court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carley, C. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, I, Michael R.
Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(a) This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 12, 2005

                                             /s/ Michael R. Cunningham
                                             Michael R. Cunningham
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randy  Moseley,  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of Utilicraft
Industries, Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the registrant;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information  relating  to  the  registrant  is  made  known  to  us  by  others,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 15, 2008

By: /s/ Randy Moseley
---------------------
 Randy Moseley,
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James B. Hawkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. HawkinsPrint Name:

James B. HawkinsTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

May 7, 2010


In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Murphy, Vice President
Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Steven J. MurphyPrint Name:

Steven J. MurphyTitle:

Vice President Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 7, 2010
No. 68575.

protests 63/11984, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### International Rectifier Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of multimeters, milliammeters, or volt-ohm-milliampere meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. G. *L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




**AND
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:




(i)  The
      Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
      31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and




(ii)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April
                16, 2007
              By:
              /s/ John
                S.
                KovachJohn
                S. KovachChief
                Executive Officer and Chief
                Financial Officer