alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

            ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.19

                      Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc.
             Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R6

            I, John P. Grazer, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed
Executive Vice President of Ameriquest Mortgage Company (the "Master Servicer"),
and further certify as follows:

            1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2005 (the "Agreement"),
among Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, the Master Servicer and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

            2. I have reviewed the activities of the Master Servicer during the
preceding year and the Master Servicer's performance under the Agreement and to
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the year.

            Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set
forth in the Agreement.

Dated: 3/14/06
<PAGE>

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of 3/14/06.

                                                By: /s/ John P. Grazer
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                Name: John P. Grazer
                                                Title: Executive Vice President


            I, Denise Apicella, an Assistant Secretary of the Master Servicer,
hereby certify that John P. Grazer is a duly elected, qualified, and acting
Executive Vice President of the Master Servicer and that the signature appearing
above is his genuine signature.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of 3/14/06.

                                                By: /s/ Denise Apicella
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                Name: Denise Apicella
                                                Title: Assistant Secretary
#### Grace Morrison *vs.*Barron Furniture Company.

Penobscot County.

Decided August 12, 1938.

The action is in trover, for the value of certain articles of household furniture: plea the general issue, and averment of absence of title in plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s husband, on cross-examination by defendant’s counsel,' was asked, “You understood perfectly that this was not Mrs. Morrison’s first marriage?” Subsequent to objection the court excluded the question, and granted an exception.

The case shows that plaintiff was formerly the wife of a brother of her present husband, and Exhibit C., printed therewith may *510somewhere be offered in evidence as tending to prove untrue statements on the part of someone. There is no evidence that the exhibit was offered, identified or used in the case.

*B. W. Blanchard,*for plaintiff.

*Harvey D. Eaton,*for defendant.

The matter inquired into, and bringing up the exception, is evidence incapable of affording any reasonable presumption or inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute, title to the property. It is wholly collateral. Exception overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDAPHIS CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,983<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,742
<PP&E>                                         114,443<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 773,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           559
<OTHER-SE>                                     449,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   773,703
<SALES>                                        136,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,582
<CGS>                                                0<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,711<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<FN>
<F1>Receivables and PP&E are shown net of allowances for doubtful accounts and
accumulated depreciation, respectively.
<F2>The Company presents a one-step income statement and cost of revenues is not
separately determinable from the historical financial statements.
<F3>Includes salaries and wages, other operating expenses, depreciation and
amortization and restructing and other charges.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip M. Pead, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in
such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                             By: /s/ PHILIP M. PEAD
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Philip M. Pead
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 4, 2005















                                        2
No. 66159.

#### Florea *& Co.,*Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/3720, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 915, as modified, *supra,*as knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves, and the items marked “B’’ at 30 percent under paragraph 1208, as modified, *supra,*as knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves.
No. 61668.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 311078-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lenses for photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, the merchandise in question is dutiable as photographic lenses, the claim of the plaintiff at 25 percent was sustained.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 
 
 Docket Nos.PGR 2022 Lessee 8, LLC
EG23-220-000Porter Solar, LLC
EG23-221-000Orlando CoGen Limited, L.P
EG23-222-000Vineyard Wind 1 LLC
EG23-223-000Derby Fuel Cell, LLC
EG23-224-000Chevelon Butte RE II LLC
EG23-225-000Strauss Wind, LLC
EG23-226-000Arica Solar, LLC
EG23-227-000Redonda PV LLC
EG23-228-000Victory Pass I, LLC
EG23-229-000Misenheimer Solar LLC
EG23-230-000Downeast Wind, LLC
EG23-231-000Great Cove Solar LLC
EG23-232-000Great Cove Solar II LLC
EG23-233-000Tunica Windpower LLC
EG23-234-000Platteview Solar, LLC
EG23-235-000Cavalier Solar A2, LLC
EG23-236-000McFarland Solar B, LLC
EG23-237-000Copperhead Solar, LLC
EG23-238-0007V Solar Ranch, LLC
EG23-239-000Crystal Hill Solar, LLC
EG23-240-000EnerSmart Los Coches BESS LLC
EG23-241-000Eleven Mile Solar Center, LLC
EG23-242-000
 Take notice that during the month of September 2023, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2022). Dated: October 10, 2023. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2023-22768 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
-                      -                        -  소개 
                      - 뉴스 & 멀티미디어
                      -  뉴스 & 멀티미디어 
                      -  소셜 미디어                          -  Social Media Policies 
                      -  블로그 
                      -  이벤트 
                      -  Fact Sheets 
                      -  FEMA Live 
                      -  Mobile Products 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  보도자료 
                      -  Podcast 
                      -  당사 소개 
                      -  보고서 & 데이터 
                      -  FEMA in Action 

          This page has not been translated into 한국어. Visit the 한국어 page for resources in that language.        

# Social Media

                            - English 

We use social media to engage the public around the FEMA mission of helping people before, during and after disasters. You can also find interesting topics of discussion related to FEMA and emergency management by following our PrepTalks video and FEMA Podcast series.

**Disaster Support Social Graphics**Find graphics optimized for Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to communicate important information after a disaster, like deadlines to apply for assistance and how to send documents to FEMA. **View all.**

## Official FEMA Social Media Accounts

### Facebook

FEMA's Facebook page  |   FEMA en Español  |   Ready

#### Other FEMA Facebook Pages

                            - FEMA Puerto Rico  
                            - FEMA U.S. Virgin Islands 
                            - FEMA Harvey 

                            - U.S. Fire Administration 
                            - Center for Domestic Preparedness 
                            - Emergency Management Institute 

### Twitter

FEMA on Twitter  |  FEMA Español  |  Ready

#### Other FEMA Twitter Pages

                                - Region 1
                                - Region 2
                                - Region 3
                                - Region 4
                                - Region 5

                                - Region 6
                                - Region 7
                                - Region 8
                                - Region 9
                                - Region 10 

                            - FEMA Administrator
                            - FEMAspox  /   FEMAportavoz  (español)
                            - U.S. Fire Administration 
                            - Center for Domestic Preparedness
                            - Emergency Management Institute 
                            - FEMAGrants

### YouTube

FEMA's YouTube Channel

### Instagram

FEMA on Instagram  | Ready on Instagram

### LinkedIn

FEMA on LinkedIn  |  FEMA Training

## Policies

To understand how we review and interact with comments on our social media accounts, view our Social Media Comment Policy. 

To understand what information we collect and how we use it, view our Privacy Policy. 

위로 돌아가십시오
Case No. 14,919a.

#### UNITED STATES v. DASHIELL.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
# L_2022109EN.01007301.xml

| 8.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/73

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2021/2278 of 20 December 2021 suspending the Common Customs Tariff duties referred to in Article 56(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 on certain agricultural and industrial products, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1387/2013

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 466 of 29 December 2021
  )

On page 159, in the Annex, in the entry for serial number 0.8148, in the column ‘Date envisaged for mandatory review’:

for:

‘
  01.12.2022
  ’,

read:

‘
  31.12.2022
  ’;

on page 215, in the Annex, in the entry for serial number 0.7103, in the column ‘Description’:

for:

‘... of a kind used for thermal cameras or IP network cameras (1)’,

read:

‘... of a kind used for thermal cameras or IP network cameras’.

---
August 31, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

West Building Ground Floor,

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington ,DC 20590

Attention: John S. Duncan 

 Director, Flight Standards Service

RE: Petition to Amend FAA Exemption No. 11695 (“the Exemption “) Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-0756

Dear Mr. Duncan,

Helicam Helicopters Inc. hereby requests approval to amend the Exemption to permit 

Helicam Helicopters Inc. to operate an additional model of UAS; the DJI Inspire 1. the FAA has 

previously authorized use of the DJI Inspire 1 for commercial purposes on multiple occasions ( e.g., Exemptions 

# 11318,11447,11458,11461 and 114630).

All UAS operation will comply with the existing Flight Operations Procedures Manual (FOPM) granted 

the existing UAS and fully adhere to the conditions of the Exemption and will be in full compliance with the terms 

of the Exemption.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Please contact me at 425 450-4045 for any concerns or questions.

Regards,

John Michael Higgins

President 

Helicam Helicopters Inc.

	 	

P.O.Box 482

Medina, Washington 98039

Phone 425 450-4045

Choppershots@hotmail.com
# L_2022204EN.01001601.xml

| 4.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/16

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1313 of 25 July 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 198 of 27 July 2022
  )

In the title on the Contents Page, and on page 17 in the title and in the signature:

for:

’
  25 July 2022
  ’,

read:

’
  26 July 2022
  ’.

---
(Reap. Dec. 11102)

#### Equipment Importers, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1854.

(Decided November 15, 1965)

*Glad & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Glenn E. Harris,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of certain “ ‘Jet Puller’ brand Eatchet Lever Hoists,” exported from Japan on or about July 30,1961.

The record indicates that notice of advance of value was served on the importer on December 18,1962. A purported appeal to reappraisement was filed on December 13, 1962, 5 days before the notice of appraisal was given. Section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, reads:

> SEO. 501. NOTICE OF APPRAISEMENT — REAPPRAISEMENT.

> The collector shall give written notice of appraisement to the consignee, his agent, or his attorney, if (1) the appraised value is higher than the entered value, or (2) a change in the classification of the merchandise results from the appraiser’s determination of value, or (3) in any case, if the consignee, his agent, or his attorney requests such notice in writing before appraisement, setting forth a substantial reason for requesting the notice. The decision of the appraiser, including all determinations entering into the same, shall be final and conclusive upon all parties unless a written appeal for a reappraisement is filed with or mailed to the United States Customs Court by the collector within sixty days after the date of the appraiser’s report, or filed by the consignee or his agent *676with the collector within thirty days after the date of personal delivery, or if mailed the date of mailing of written notice of appraisement to the consignee, his agent, or his attorney. * * *

Counsel for the plaintiff conceded that what was relied upon as an appeal was filed prior to the date the notice of appraisement was sent out (B. 9). The appeal in this case was untimely and the same was ordered dismissed. Accordingly, this appeal to reappraisement is dismissed for untimeliness.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 47

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1999

   Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Wynn, and Mr. Moran of 
  Virginia) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds 
on July 10, 1999, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in this resolution may be construed to waive the 
applicability of the prohibitions established by section 4 of the Act 
of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, 
displays, and solicitations on the Capitol grounds.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C §1350

 

I, Stephanie Bowman, the Chief Financial Officer of Tuesday MorningCorporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.               Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tuesday Morning Corporation for theperiod ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TuesdayMorning Corporation.

 
| Date: November 1, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Stephanie Bowman                      |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Stephanie Bowman  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2019

No. 04-19-00589-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.T., A CHILD,

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-09-34741-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporter responsible for filing the reporter’s record in this appeal has filed a 

notification of late record informing the court that the reporter’s record has not been filed

because (1) appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee for the reporter’s record and 

the appellant has failed to pay the fee or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the 

reporter’s record and (2) appellant has failed to provide a designation of record notifying her of 

the portions of the reporter’s record that need to be prepared for this appeal.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before 

September 26, 2019, that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s 

fee. We FURTHER ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before 

September 26, 2019, that he has requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6 and has filed a copy of his request with 

the trial court clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b). 

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the court will only consider those 

issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
No. 57110.

protests 146916-K, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

.In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of abrasive sludge similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *C. J. Tower & Sons*(40 C. C. P. A. 14, C. A. D. 491), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1664 was sustained.