alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.10

                  AMENDMENT, dated as of February 10, 2003, to Long Term
Incentive Plan (1993), as heretofore amended through January 20, 2003 (the
"Plan"), of Concord Camera Corp., a New Jersey corporation (the "Corporation").

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following subparagraph (i) to Article VIII:

                  (i) Deferred Delivery of Common Stock. The Committee may in
         its discretion permit a Participant to defer delivery of Common Stock
         acquired pursuant to a Participant's exercise of an option in
         accordance with the terms and conditions of a deferred compensation
         plan established by the Corporation. Such deferral shall be deemed to
         be invested in Common Stock, shall not exceed two years and shall be
         payable only in Common Stock.



<PAGE>




                  AMENDMENT, dated as of June 2, 2003, to Long Term Incentive
Plan (1993), as heretofore amended through February 10, 2003 (the "Plan"), of
Concord Camera Corp., a New Jersey corporation (the "Corporation").

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by replacing
subparagraph (i) to Article VIII with the following:

                  (i) Deferred Delivery of Common Stock. The Committee may in
         its discretion permit a Participant to defer delivery of Common Stock
         acquired pursuant to a Participant's exercise of an option in
         accordance with the terms and conditions of a deferred delivery plan
         established by the Corporation. Such deferral shall be deemed to be
         invested in Common Stock, shall not exceed two years unless the
         Committee or the Board extends the length of the deferral period as to
         one or more Participants to beyond two years, and shall be payable only
         in Common Stock in accordance with the payment provisions of such
         deferred delivery plan.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-41
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-41


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer). The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2009
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ MARK P. MAYS       
|Name:                    |  | Mark P. Mays           
|Title:                   |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will
be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
A90A0176.

#### PINSON v. THE STATE.

(391 SE2d 28)

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Pinson was found guilty of the offense of abandonment and non-support of his minor child, OCGA § 19-10-1. In appealing from this judgment he enumerates two errors: (1) the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the report on the blood test performed to determine the likelihood *vel non*of paternity, in that the chain of custody of the blood samples was allegedly not sufficiently established; and (2) that the trial court violated defendant/appellant’s constitutional right against self-incrimination by ordering him to undergo a blood test pursuant to OCGA § 19-7-5. *Held:*

1. OCGA §§ 19-7-46 and 19-10-1 expressly permit the admission into evidence of blood tests such as that at issue here “when offered by a duly qualified geneticist, or other duly qualified person.” Our examination of the trial transcript reveals that appellant stipulated to *507the qualification of the laboratory official as an expert witness. The transcript further reveals that this witness testified that the blood samples involved in the test were handled according to the laboratory’s normal procedures, and that the laboratory’s “internal chain of custody” of the samples was maintained at all times. We find no error in the admission of this evidence, and appellant’s first enumeration is devoid of merit.

Decided February 13, 1990.

*Charles E. Muskett,*for appellant.

*John H. Cranford, Solicitor,*for appellee.

2. OCGA § 19-7-45 expressly authorizes the trial court to order blood tests when, as in the instant case, properly requested. As to violation of the constitutional guarantees against self-incrimination, the Supreme Court held in *Raines v. White,*248 Ga. 406, 407 (284 SE2d 7) (1981), that requiring a blood test for the purpose of proving or disproving paternity “would not compel appellant to be a witness against himself within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution [cit.] nor would such procedure compel him ‘to give testimony tending in any manner to incriminate himself’ within the meaning of the Georgia Constitution.” See also *Smith v. City of East Point,*189 Ga. App. 454 (376 SE2d 215) (1988). Georgia’s highest court having expressly held the challenged requirement to be constitutional, appellant’s second enumeration is also without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur. Beasley, J., also concurs specially.*

Beasley, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur fully but wish to point out that the wording in the Georgia Constitution quoted in *Raines v. White,*248 Ga. 406, 407 (284 SE2d 7) (1981), has changed somewhat. It now is “to be self-incriminating” instead of “to incriminate himself.” Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XVI. Although it is the latter which applies to this case, the result is the same.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 118 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 118

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 28 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking

the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ``October 29, 
2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
888 First Street, NE #11-A | Washington, DC 20426 | 202.502.8000

March 27, 2020

The President

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20500

Mr. President:

Pursuant to Section 10 of Executive Order No. 13892 on Promoting the Rule of Law 

Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication issued 

on October 9, 2019, I am pleased to submit the enclosed report demonstrating that the civil 

administrative enforcement activities, investigations, and other actions of the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission comply with section 223 of Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act.

A copy of this report will be posted on the Commission’s website.

Sincerely,

Neil Chatterjee Chairman

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 52 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 52

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                       relating to school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1999

    Mr. Murtha introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                       relating to school prayer.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to prohibit 
individual prayer in public schools or to prohibit public school 
officials from including voluntary prayer in official school ceremonies 
and meetings. Neither the United States nor any State shall prescribe 
the content of any such prayer.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50273

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIK OMAR ESTRADA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-628-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Erik Omar Estrada

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 99.10**

 
|               | Principal Officers:

 

Harry Jung, P. Eng.

  President,  C.E.O.

Dana B. Laustsen, P. Eng.

  Executive V.P.,  C.O.O.

Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.    Executive V.P.                                                                  |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|          | Officers / Vice Presidents:

Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng.  Jodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.  Neil I. Dell, P. Eng.  David G. Harris, P. Geol. Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.  Bryan M. Joe, P. Eng.  John H. Stilling, P. Eng.  Douglas R. Sutton, P. Eng.  James H. Willmon, P. Eng. |
| March 5, 2008 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

 
| Penn West  Petroleum Ltd.  2200, 425 First Street SW  Calgary AB T2P 3L8 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| **Re:      ** | **Consent  of Independent Petroleum Consultants** |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|

 

To Whom it May Concern:

 

GLJ Petroleum Consultantsconsents to the use of its reports with respect to the reserves data of PennWest Energy Trust’s: (i) Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December31, 2007; (ii) Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No.333-145296), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; (iii) FourthQuarter 2007 Press Release; (iv) Annual Information Form; and (v) BusinessAcquisition Report.

 
|   | Sincerely,                          |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |                                |
|   | **GLJ  PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.** |
|   |                                |
|   |                                     |
|   | Dana B.  Laustsen, P. Eng.          |
|   | Executive  Vice-President           |

 

----
No. 64690.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/14975 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65341.

#### Metasco, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/7484-11286, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The undersigned, Brent Suen, the Chief Financial Officer of WEYLAND TECH, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:  1. The Companys amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 20th day of November, 2018.  /s/ Brent SuenBrent SuenChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WEYLAND TECH, INC. and will be retained by WEYLAND TECH, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00024-CV

PAUL BAILEY, Appellant

V.

DANA CHERISSE MICHAELIS, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law 

No. 2

of Denton County (CV-2021-04381-JP)

March 2, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment 

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Elizabeth Kerr_________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3596-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-3596-EM), dated August 28, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued August 30, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those                           ( print page 72503)                        areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of August 28, 2023.                

Brevard, Orange, and Osceola Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-23206 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Order filed, August 21, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00574-CV

____________

CHRISTINE REULE, Appellant

V.

JOHN R. BELUS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-37325

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 25, 2014. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order My-Thuy Cieslar, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Carl F. Dill, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Technology Solutions Company, certifythat:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technology Solutions Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2006 By:  /s/ CARL F. DILL, JR.    Carl F. Dill, Jr.Chief Executive Officer