alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 67263.

protests 59/23551, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Irving Blitz *&*Associates et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo

                        On October 27, 2006, by Executive Order 13413, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has been marked by widespread violence and atrocities that continue to threaten regional stability. The President took additional steps to address this national emergency in Executive Order 13671 of July 8, 2014.                    

The situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13413 of October 27, 2006, as amended by Executive Order 13671 of July 8, 2014, must continue in effect beyond October 27, 2023. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared in Executive Order 13413, as amended by Executive Order 13671.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2023-23843

Billing code 3395-F4-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS OF
                              JUNE 30,  1997,  AND  STATEMENT  OF INCOME FOR THE
                              THREE  MONTHS  ENDING JUNE 30,  1997,  OF CHAMPION
                              FINANCIAL  CORPORATION  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
                              ENTIRETY   BY   REFERENCE   TO   SUCH    FINANCIAL
                              STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         406,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  280,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               706,863
<PP&E>                                         210,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (52,796)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,270,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          270,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,473
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               723,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               681,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 111 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 111

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2000

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking ``October 14, 2000'' in section 106(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``October 20, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7685

GEORGE W. GANTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ERNEST R. SUTTON; COLBERT L. RESPASS; OFFICER HERRING, Assistant Unit Manager; MAIL CLERK HARRIS; MA ILROOM OFFICER LIVERMAN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARNES; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHARP; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BANKS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WALKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03039-D) Submitted: April 25, 2007 Decided: May 8, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. George W. Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: George W. Gantt appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his amended complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure to comply with the court’s prior order directing him to file a complaint setting forth his claims in a short and plain statement, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), and warning him of the consequences of failing to comply. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Gantt failed to comply with Rule 8. SeeCiralsky v. CIA , 355 F.3d 661, 668-69 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review). We find, however, that the district court’s dismissal of Gantt’s complaint with prejudice was a harsh remedy. Such dismissals undermine “the sound public policy of deciding cases on their merits.” Davis v. Williams , 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978). Thus, we modify the district court’s dismissal to be without prejudice to Gantt’s right to refile a complaint that satisfies Rule 8 and affirm the district court’s order as modified. Gantt v. Sutton , No. 5:06-ct-03039-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SRKP 6, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard A.
              RappaportRichard A. RappaportPrincipal Executive OfficerMarch 19, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 115 Received in Senate (RDS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 115

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 25 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking
the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ``October 26, 
2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 25, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 66658.

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/12137 (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, covered by entry 0-1202, consists of a diaphragm aperture block for a Cobalt therapy unit and the merchandise, covered by entry 0-1884, consists of a treatment head for a Cobalt therapy unit, imported for the use of nonprofit organizations, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/lifestagesandpopulations/baby-steps-autism.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/lifestagesandpopulations/baby-steps-autism.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
No. 66648.

#### J. L. Wood et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/2542, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel -that the merchandise consists of decharacterized horsemeat, fresh, chilled, or frozen, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66254, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices 

# Order

October 5, 2018

157215

RODNEY HARRISON,

Plaintiff,

and

MICHIGAN HEAD & SPINE

INSTITUTE, PC,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157215

COA: 334083

Wayne CC: 14

- 013225

- NF

ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

THURMAN CLIFFORD RIDENOUR,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 28, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , C.J. ( dissenting ).

I respectfully dissent from this Court’s order denying leave to appeal. After

plaintiff was injured in a September 2014 accident, he sued his no

- fault insurer,

defendant Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company, for unpaid personal

prote ction insurance (PIP) benefits including work

- loss benefits. Plaintiff made various

and contradictory assertions throughout discovery to sustain his claim for work

- loss

benefits. In particular, he stated in his interrogatory answers that he was employed by

TPH Transportation Services at the time of his accident, but later acknowledged at his

deposition that this was an “[i]naccurate statement” and that he had last been employed

by TPH Transportation Services in 2012. Furthermore, none of his assertions c oncerning

his income before and after the accident was corroborated; of the multiple companies that

he identified as current or former employers, not one was able to provide any sort ofI, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 5, 2018

a1002 2

Clerk proof to support his obviously exaggerated income assertions. Given these facts, the trial

court, in my judgment, correctly granted summary disposition in favor of defendant on

the ground that plaintiff committed fraud in seeking work

- loss benefits, and the Court of

Appeals erred by ruling to the contrary. I would therefore reverse the judgment of the

Court of Appeals and reinstate the trial court’s ruling in favor of defendant Allstate.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - K-Tronik International Corp. - Exhibit 10.18


Exhibit 10.18

 


  	The bank must inform the contractor
          of the important agreement provisions under this agreement, and issue
          to the contractor the copy of the bank credit transaction basic agreement
          and this agreement.



  

   


  	Section	Reviewed by	Approved by
	 	 	 	 




 

Additional Transaction Agreement for
  (________)

  (To increase the credit line / renew the credit transaction term)

	Fiscal Stamp

      

          




  To Woori Bank


  May 29, 2003
  	Contractor	Kaeseong Shin / K-Tronics     (Seal)	Seal

        Comparison 
	Address	250-2 Yatao-Dong, Bundang-Gu,

        Sungnam, Kyungki	 
	Comaker	Taewoong Jung     (Seal)	Seal

        Comparison 
	Address	111-1601, Lotte APT, 1263, Gooro-5-Dong,
        

        Gooro Gu, Seoul	 
	Comaker	Taewoong Jung / Daekyung Enterprise Co.,
        Ltd     (Seal) 	Seal

        Comparison 
	Address	442, Kwangmyung Model Industrial Complex,
        201, Hasan-Dong, Kwangmyung, Kyungki	 


  

   

This agreement is made as followed, adding to the
  Credit Agreement for Company Buying Fund (Agreed Credit Line:   KRW)
  dated June 4 of 2001.

	Credit Line increment

        


	 

      A. Amount Inemapood:       KRW

      B. Interest Rate: (            )

        


 

	Renewal of Credit Transaction Term

        


	 

      A. Credit Line Amount before Renewal; Four Hundreds Twenty Eight Million
      KRW 

      B. Credit Line Amount Decreased                KRW

      C. Credit Line Amount applied for Renewal; Four Hundreds Twenty Eight Million
      KRW 

      D. Transaction Term after Renewal: until May 29, 2004

      E. Interest Rate: (Benchmark Interest Rate + 3.01%)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                        AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Gary
Fromm, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American
Technologies Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

December 20, 2004

/s/ Dr. Gary Fromm
------------------
Dr. Gary Fromm
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

January 8, 1952

No. 56231.

protests 129404-K, etc. (New York).

#### James F. Farrell et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
A90A0078.

#### SIKES & SWANSON PONTIAC-GMC TRUCK, INC. v. CANTRELL.

(392 SE2d 36)

Decided March 12, 1990.

*Macklyn A. Smith, Sr.,*for appellant.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Sikes & Swanson Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., sold a vehicle to the appellee in January 1987. The sale was financed by the First National Bank of Atlanta, and the appellant signed a recourse guaranty with that bank. In January 1988 the appellee left the car with the appellant for repair work and later decided to leave it there and allow repossession by the bank. The appellee notified the bank of her intentions; on January 20, 1988, the bank acknowledged that notification and informed the appellee that the bank was giving her the opportunity to reconsider by not placing the account into “repo status” until January 30, 1988.

The bank did not actually retrieve the car until March 17, 1988, and made its first attempt to satisfy the notice requirements of OCGA § 10-1-36 on the following day. (A second notice of repossession, right to redeem, and intention to pursue deficiency was sent on September 16, 1988.) There was a deficiency when the bank resold the car, and the appellant paid the deficiency pursuant to the recourse guaranty.

The appellant then commenced this action against the appellee to recover the amount of the deficiency. This appeal follows the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the appellee. *Held:*

OCGA § 10-1-36 provides that when a motor vehicle has been repossessed, the seller or holder cannot recover a deficiency against the buyer unless within 10 days of the repossession he notifies the buyer by registered or certified mail of the intent to pursue a deficiency. Compliance with this Code section is a condition precedent to recovery of any deficiency. *Doughty v. Assoc. Commercial Corp.,*152 Ga. App. 575 (263 SE2d 493) (1979).

In the instant case, the trial court concluded that the repossession occurred in January 1988, not when the bank physically removed the car from the appellant’s premises, and that the bank therefore had not complied with the 10-day notice requirements of OCGA § 10-1-36. We agree. Accordingly, since the bank could not have pursued a deficiency against the appellee, neither could the appellant, whose rights were derivative of the bank’s.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.*

*819*John E. Stell, Jr.,*for appellee.
Before the Second Division,

July 11, 1947

No. 51842.

#### Yamanaka & Co., Inc.. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 93462-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of August 22, 2003 by
and between Omnicomm Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, and
Cornelis Wit (the "Executive").

         1. Reference is hereby made to that certain Employment Agreement (the
"Employment Agreement") dated June 1, 2002 by and between the Company and
Executive. All terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
same meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement.

         2. Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

                  "Term and Termination. This Agreement shall commence on June
                  1, 2002 and shall terminate as of the earlier of:

                  (a)      December 31, 2004, unless extended by the Company;

                  (b)      the death or disability of the Executive. Disability
                           shall mean the Executive's inability, due to sickness
                           or injury, to perform effectively his duties
                           hereunder for a period of at least 90 consecutive
                           days;

                  (c)      thirty (30) days after notice is given by the Company
                           to the Executive after a material breach hereof by
                           the Executive; or,

                  (d)      thirty (30) days after notice is given by the
                           Executive to the Company after a material breach
                           hereof by the Company.

         The exercise of the Company's or the Executive's right to terminate
this Agreement pursuant to clause (c) or (d) hereof, as the case may be, shall
not abrogate the rights and remedies of the terminating party in respect of the
breach giving rise to such termination.

         3. Except as otherwise amended hereby the terms and conditions of the
Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the day and year first hereinabove written.

OMNICOMM SYSTEMS, INC.

BY: /s/ RANDALL SMITH
   -------------------------------
    Name: Randall Smith
    Title: Chairman of the Board

EXECUTIVE:

/s/ CORNELIS WIT
--------------------
Cornelis Wit
**EXHIBIT 32.2(d)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the annual report of The GreenbrierCompanies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annualperiod ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (theReport), I, William A. Furman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.Date: November 1, 2005/s/ Larry G. Brady Larry G. BradySenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer