alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[106th Congress Public Law 573]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ573.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 3061]]

Public Law 106-573
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To repeal the modification of the installment method. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 
                         2000 -  [H.R. 3594]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Installment Tax 
Correction Act of 2000.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 26 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Installment Tax Correction Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 26 USC 453 note.>> REPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF INSTALLMENT 
            METHOD.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 536 of the Ticket to Work 
and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 <<NOTE: 26 USC 
453.>> (relating to modification of installment method and repeal of 
installment method for accrual method taxpayers) is repealed effective 
with respect to sales and other dispositions occurring on or after the 
date of the enactment of such Act.

    (b) Applicability.--The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 
applied and administered as if that subsection (and the amendments made 
by that subsection) had not been enacted.

    Approved December 28, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3594:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Dec. 15, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 55068.

#### A. Schulman, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 132151-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 239

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives

to make a technical correction in the enrollmentof the bill H.R. 3194.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 239

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 3194), making appropriations for the government of the

4 District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in

5 whole or in part against revenues of said District for the
2

•HCON 239 EH

1 fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other pur2 poses, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall in3 sert before the comma at the end of section 1000(a)(7)

4 of division B the following: ‘‘, except that subsection (c)

5 of section 912 of H.R. 3427 shall be deemed to read as

6 follows:

7 ‘(c) ADVANCE CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—

8 ‘(1) FISCAL YEAR 1998.—Funds made available

9 pursuant to section 911(a)(1) may be obligated and

10 expended beginning on or after December 15, 1999,

11 provided that the appropriate certification has been

12 submitted to the appropriate congressional commit13 tees.

14 ‘(2) FISCAL YEARS 1999 AND 2000.—Funds

15 made available pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of

16 section 911(a) may be obligated and expended only

17 if the appropriate certification has been submitted to

18 the appropriate congressional committees 30 days

19 prior to the payment of the funds’ ’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 19,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 7/11/2012

Form REP-703

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Sample Number: 122484-001 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:45 Date Received: 6/6/2012

 Trip Blank

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg < 0.2 ng/L U 0.5 0.2 ALS* 07/10/2012 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 122484-002 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:45 Date Received: 6/6/2012

 Field Blank

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 1.2 ng/L 0.5 0.2 ALS* 07/10/2012 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 122484-003 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:45 Date Received: 6/6/2012

Plant Outfall #001 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 2 ng/L J 2 1 ALS* 06/27/2012 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 122484-004 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:35 Date Received: 6/6/2012

CPS Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 280 ng/L 5 2 ALS* 07/10/2012 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 122484-005 Date Collected: 06/06/2012 08:40 Date Received: 6/6/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 3.7 ng/L 0.5 0.2 ALS* 07/10/2012 EPA 1631E

Mountaineer Plant, 122484 Page 1 of 2
THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

*Mercury was analyzed by ALS Environmental Lab

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 122484 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.2







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 on
Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report of BigString Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Robert
DeMeulemeester, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),
      and,




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  April
      30, 2009
            /s/
      Robert DeMeulemeesterRobert
      DeMeulemeesterChief
      Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO\


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),


I,
      Michael G. Wirtz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
      November 2, 2006








/s/
      Michael G. Wirtz


------------------------------


Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James B. Hawkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    James B. HawkinsPrint Name: James B. HawkinsTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 7, 2009


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Murphy, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    Steven J. MurphyPrint Name: Steven J. MurphyTitle: Vice President Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 7, 2009
A89A1833, A89A1834.

#### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. SHUGART et al.; and vice versa.

(392 SE2d 576)

Decided February 6, 1990.

*Weiner, Dwyer & Yancey, James S. S. Howell, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General,*for appellant.

*Peek & Whaley, J. Corbett Peek, Jr., James Garland Peek,*for appellees.

Birdsong, Judge.

The Department of Transportation appeals from the denial of its motion for new trial in this condemnation suit. Appellees have cross-appealed from the order of the trial court vacating and setting aside the judgment of the trial court. *Held:*

The parties agree these appeals are governed by our decision in *Department of Transp. v. Petkas,*189 Ga. App. 633 (377 SE2d 166) (whole court), cert. den. Accordingly, the main appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed and remanded to the trial court with direction to reinstate the original judgment as of May 20, 1988, the date entered, and to take such other corrective action as thereafter may be required.

*Appeals dismissed and cases remanded with direction.*

*Deen, P. J., and Cooper, J., concur.*
Exhibit 10(a)




	INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT




	We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement No. 333-56205 of
Merrill Lynch Pan-European Growth Fund of Mercury Funds, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form N-1A of our reports dated July 8, 2003 for the
Fund and July 8, 2003 for Mercury Master Pan-European Growth Portfolio of Mercury Master Trust, both appearing in the May 31, 2003
Annual Report of the Fund, in the Statement of Additional Information which is part of this Registration Statement.  We also consent
to the reference to us under the caption “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectus, which is also part of this Registration Statement. 





	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 
    
	Princeton, New Jersey 

      September 12, 2003
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00162-CR

Antonio OLVEDA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CR8045

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 10, 2010

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on September 28, 2009. No timely

motion for new trial having been filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than

October 28, 2009. See TEX.R.APP. P. 26.2. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed with the trial

court clerk until February 16, 2010. This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal

conviction in the absence of a timely, written notice of appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519,

522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996);see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim.
04-10-00162-CR

-2-

App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought byfiling a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure); Apt v. State, No. 04-03-

00885-CR, 2004 WL 730832, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Apr. 7, 2004, no pet.) (unlike rule in

civil cases, notice of appeal filed with appellate court in criminal case is not deemed filed the same

day with the trial court clerk) (not designated for publication). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed

for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Order entered September 30, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00415-CV

JUST ENERGY TEXAS I CORP., Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND CEDRIC THOMAS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07637-I

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 26, 2014 unopposed motion to extend time to file 

reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 6, 2014. We caution appellant 

that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
PUBLIC LAW 111–70—OCT. 9, 2009 123 STAT. 2057 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2131: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Sept. 23, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–70 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to reauthorize 

the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY 

COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY. 

Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 

Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ‘‘October 

1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2010’’. 

Approved October 9, 2009. 

Oct. 9, 2009 

[H.R. 2131] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
Applicant’s 

Optional 

Request for 

Pre-filing 

Process

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Natural Gas Act Review Process

OEMR

Provides 

Rate and 

Tariff 

Guidance

Applicant Files 

Formal Application

Interventions, 

Protests, and 

Comments

Reviews Comments and Issues 

Data Requests

Commissioner 

Consideration 

Before Order 

Issued

Order on 

Application 

Issued

Non-Environmental Review 

and Analysis

Environmental Review Scoping 

(if no 

prefiling)

EA

Draft EIS

Stakeholder 

Comment 

Period

Final EIS

Notice Issued and 

Published In 

Federal Register

OEP Assists Applicant in 

Identifying Necessary 

Information for 

Application, Works with 

Other Agencies and 

Stakeholders, and 

Conducts Scoping

OGC Drafts 

Final Order

Staff Review

Review 

Requests for 

Rehearing

Order on 

Rehearing 

Issued

OEP OEMR

Staff Pre-Filing Involvement

OGC

OEP, OE and 

OEMR 

Review

Draft Order

Provides Policy And Legal Advice 

Determines whether 

Application Includes Rate and 

Tariff Issues Reviews Comments and Issues 

Data Requests

Legal/Policy Issue Review

OGC 

Provides 

Legal 

Guidance

OGC Drafts 

Order with 

input from 

OEP, OE, and 

OEMR

Comments on 

EA Reviewed

Comments on 

DEIS Reviewed

Rate Insert Drafted 

and Sent to OGC 

and OEP

Public Convenience 

and Necessity 

Analysis Drafted and 

Sent to OGC

Environmental 

Insert Drafted and 

Sent to OGC

OEP

OE

OEMR

Determines whether 

Application Includes 

Accounting Issues Reviews Comments and Issues 

Data Requests Accounting Insert 

Drafted and Sent to 

OGC and OEP

OE

OE Provides 

Accounting 

Guidance

Stakeholder 

Comment 

Period

Updated 9/28/18

Abbreviation Key on page 2
Abbreviation Key

EIS environmental impact statement

DEIS draft environmental impact statement

FEIS final environmental impact statement

EA environmental assessment

NGA Natural Gas Act

OE Office of Enforcement

OEMR Office of Energy Market Regulation

OEP Office of Energy Projects

OGC Office of the General Counsel
Mr, Dennis DcV any £AS & Domestic adn"" 11 ~-., 

of Aviasion 

DepeJtnjent ofT ranaponation 

l 200 New Avtaue. 

WMhin~ DC .:.'UJ,.'U 

RIJ: Tupelo Rt~~iontll AJrport (TUP) 

Detke~ DOT'..OST·Z6fi9..11SfJS 

Dear Mr" DeVany: 

IZ 

April 30~ 2012 

1 am wtitittg in support otSilver AirwaY$ i prop01al to provide commercial air . 

li:""l"i.Jti"Jil to Tupelo Regional Airport from depend on K~:.onlll Airpn.n for ~heir ~e:rvice. U is very imporlant to our 1ocal eco~t~a~ny 

il:! ..... """a to continPe in and out of Tupelo, We believe Silver Ah"W:tll)'S1 interline tJCt:;IUrli:l 

baggap q;roement1 witb Delta Airline~ mae to 

ln addition to ~e~t are more deiirabte than tho 8 sat 

ai.rcra.ftoffered by Air Choice One. Wttt are excited about this cbance to rerum to 

profitability, Thank fur considtrin.g our in
-                      -                        -  关于我们 
                      - 新闻与多媒体
                      -  新闻与多媒体 
                      -  事实简介 
                      -  博客 
                      -  活动 
                      -  FEMA直播 
                      -  移动端产品 
                      -  新闻通讯 
                      -  新闻发布 
                      -  播客 
                      -  社交媒体 
                      -  关于我们 
                      -  报告与数据 
                      -  FEMA在行动 

          This page has not been translated into 简体中文. Visit the 简体中文 page for resources in that language.        

# Fact Sheets

                            - English 

FEMA 更新个人援助计划 
FEMA 在过去 20 年期间实施了灾后援助最重要的政策更新。
 Release Date: 三月 22, 2024

请正确使用联邦紧急事务管理局的拨款
联邦紧急事务管理局(以下简称为“FEMA”)的救灾援助旨在帮助您在灾后有一个安全、卫生且能正常使用的住房。在有些情况下,此类援助不能包括或不能用于支付您所有的费用。在收到 FEMA 付款后的一两天之内,您将收到一封信函,解释应如何使用您的补助金。
 Release Date: 一月 23, 2024

公民身份和联邦紧急事务管理局援助资格
联邦紧急事务管理局(以下简称为“FEMA”)致力于帮助库克县 (Cook County) 的房主和租房者从 2023 年 9 月 17日至18 日的严重风暴和洪灾中恢复过来,包括美国公民、非公民国民和合格外籍人士。
 Release Date: 一月 18, 2024

直接住房援助计划重新认证
重新认证是联邦紧急事务管理局(以下简称为“FEMA”)重新评估直接住房居住者资格的一个流程。这一流程通过每月访问进行,有助于促使居住者完成自己的永久性住房计划
 Release Date: 一月 12, 2024

直接住房计划接受者必须遵守许可协议
那些已获准居住“临时住房单元”的飓风伊达利亚 (Hurricane Idalia) 受灾民众,可自灾难公告之日起在联邦紧急事务管理局(以下简称为“FEMA”)提供的单元中居住最多 18 个月,并在这一期间找到永久性的住房解决方案。但是,他们必须遵守与 FEMA 签订的“可撤销许可协议”或“临时住房协议”中的条款和条件。
 Release Date: 一月 11, 2024

影响联邦紧急事务管理局做出资格决定的常见原因以及如何对其提出上诉
在9月17日至18日暴风雨和洪水之后申请联邦紧急事务管理局(以下简称为“FEMA”)援助的库克县 (Cook) 居民将收到FEMA的一封来函。请仔细阅读这封信函,其中可能提到您目前没有资格获得援助,但这并不是拒绝。您可以通过提交上诉来改变这个决定。
 Release Date: 十二月 21, 2023

提交小企业管理局申请的五个理由
申请联邦紧急事务管理局的援助之后,您可能会被转介到美国小企业管理局(以下简称为“SBA”)。如果要求您提交 SBA 救灾贷款申请的话,请立即填写并提交申请,这样做会有很多好处。
 Release Date: 十二月 14, 2023

联邦紧急事务管理局个人援助计划问题解答
联邦紧急事务管理局(简称为“FEMA”)的“个人援助计划”旨在通过为基本和关键需求提供补助金来帮助受灾民众开始救灾恢复过程。以下是有关联邦政府援助流程的问题解答。
 Release Date: 十二月 6, 2023

向 FEMA 提交申请后须知
有关联邦紧急事务管理局(简称为“FEMA”)的援助流程,请记住以下重要步骤
 Release Date: 十二月 5, 2023

FEMA 和佛罗里达州通过临时庇护所和住房解决方案为伊达利亚飓风受灾民众提供支持
联邦紧急事务管理局(简称为“FEMA”)和佛罗里达州政府目前在加紧工作,以确保那些因伊达利亚飓风 (Hurricane Idalia) 而遭受房屋和财产损失的佛罗里达居民在开展恢复工作时有一个安全的临时住所可以居住
 Release Date: 十一月 17, 2023

-                当前页            1 
-                页面            2 
-                页面            3 
- …
-  下一页Next › 
-  末页Last » 

Displaying 1 - 10 of 189

In an effort to keep FEMA.gov current, please see the content archive for information prior to January 20, 2021.

返回顶部
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No.
1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “Amendment”) of China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Amendment fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and               
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|By: /s/ Feng Lan                                                                                    |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Feng Lan                                                                                            |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer and President
        (Principal Executive Officer)
        April 30, 2012  |  | 
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                    |  | 
|By: /s/ Raymond Wang                                                                                |  | 
|Raymond Wang                                                                                        |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
        April 30, 2012
|                                                                                                    |  | 



The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Amendment or as a separate disclosure document of the Company
or of the certifying officers.
No. 57551.

#### Walter Hoffman et al. *v.*United States,

protests 74857-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Fobd, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*