### Name:

Title: Company: Sign Date: Name: Title: Company: Sign Date: Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 1 of 13

### Facility Information:

AES Petersburg 6925 N. State Road 57

Petersburg IN47567 Contact:Angelique Oliger Phone:(317) 261-5852 ext ____ Fax: Email: angelique.oliger@aes.com Testing Company: URS Corporation 1600 Perimeter Park Dr.

Morrisville NC27560 Contact:Brad Justus Phone:919-461-1100 Fax: 919-461-1415 Email:Brad_Justus@URScorp.com

Air Permit Number: 994 Permitted Source ID/Name: 1 1 Permitted Maximum Process Rate: N/A Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: N/A Target Process Test Rate N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: 2200 MMBtu/hr, Low NOx Burner, Neural Net Controls, Overfire Air, ESP, FGD. Industry/SCC/NAIS221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #:1812500002 FRS #:330015653241

SCC / Description10100211 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Wet Bottom (Tangential) (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width Stack Exit 258 516 2064 4 0 3 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test RunsTest Run

DurationSample

Points Comments Location% H2O Method 1 - 4 3 180 0 Stack Exit Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0 Stack Exit Formaldehyde Method 0011 3 120 0 Stack Exit 2,3,7,8-TCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 2 of 131,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Method 23 3 480 0

Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit OCDD Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,7,8-TCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit OCDF Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Other TCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other PeCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HxCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HpCDD Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other TCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other PeCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HxCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Other HpCDF Method 23 0 Stack Exit Total Dioxins Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Total Furans Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,3',4,4'-TCB (PCB77) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,4,4',5-TCB (PCB81) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,3',4,4'-PeCB (PCB105) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB114) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB118) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2',3,4,4',5-PeCB (PCB123) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,3',4,4',5-PeCB (PCB126) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,3',4,4',5/2,3,3',4,4',5'-

HxCB (PCBs156/157) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB167)Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 3,3',4,4',5,5'-HxCB (PCB169)Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit 2,3,3',4,4',5,5'-HpCB

(PCB189) Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit

Total PCBs Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Total TEQ Method 23 3 480 0 Stack Exit Total organic compounds

(TOC) as Propane Method 25A 3 120 0 Stack Exit Hydrogen Chloride Method 26 3 180 0 Stack Exit Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26 3 180 0 Stack Exit Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 180 0 Stack Exit Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 180 0 Stack Exit Inorganic (Aqueous)

Condensible Part. OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Filterable PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Organic Condensible

Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 3 of 13

### The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates.

Total PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Total Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Filterable Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Use only for dry stacks. Delete Method 5/OTM28 tests. Stack Exit

Filterable Particulate Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Lead Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Magnesium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Mercury Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 240 0 Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0 Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 240 0 Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0 Stack Exit O2 Method 3A O2 3 480 0 Stack Exit Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 480 0 Stack Exit Inorganic (Aqueous)

Condensible Part. Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Organic Condensible

Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Total Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Filterable Particulate Method 5 3 240 0 Stack Exit Filterable Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Use only for wet stacks. Delete OTM27/OTM28 test. Stack Exit

Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 180 0 Stack Exit Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 180 0 Stack Exit



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 4 of 13

### Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### LocationStack Exit - Method 26A Average Run Number 1 1 2 Test Date 3/23/2010 1/1/2010 3/31/2010 Run Start Time 9:01:00 AM 9:01:00 AM12:15:00 PM

Run Finish Time 12:28:00 PM 12:28:00 PM3:40:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 101.453 101.453 84.232 95.713 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 13.97 13.97 11.57 13.170 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 13.39 13.39 11.34 12.707 Carbon Dioxide, % 10.2 10.2 7.7 9.367 Oxygen, % 9 9 11.9 9.967 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 124.42 124.42 117.92 122.253 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 719,232.7 719,232.7 624,364.6687,610.000 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 947,342.7 947,342.7 805,535.3900,073.567 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 104.0 104.0 99.4 102.467 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 5 of 13

### LocationStack Exit - Method 26A 3 Average

Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Fw Fc



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 6 of 13

### Emissions Summary

Process Run Data 

### Location: Stack Exit - Method 26A Compound:Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber 1 1 2 Mass_mg 0.369 0.369 0.336 0.358 Elb/hr 3.46E-01 3.46E-01 3.29E-01 0.340 lb/mmBtuO2 1.38E-04 1.38E-04 2.00E-04 0.000 mg/dscm 1.28E-01 1.28E-01 1.41E-01 0.132 mg/dscm@7%O2 1.50E-01 1.50E-01 2.18E-01 0.173 

### Compound:Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber 1 1 2 Mass_mg 0.299 0.299 0.339 0.312 Elb/hr 2.80E-01 2.80E-01 3.32E-01 0.297 lb/mmBtuO2 1.12E-04 1.12E-04 2.02E-04 0.000 mg/dscm 1.04E-01 1.04E-01 1.42E-01 0.117 mg/dscm@7%O2 1.21E-01 1.21E-01 2.19E-01 0.154



### Location: Stack Exit - Method 26A 3 

### Compound:Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber 3 1 1 Mass_mg 0.301 0.369 0.369 0.346 Elb/hr 2.89E-01 3.46E-01 3.46E-01 0.327 lb/mmBtuO2 1.90E-04 1.38E-04 1.38E-04 0.000 mg/dscm 1.34E-01 1.28E-01 1.28E-01 0.130 mg/dscm@7%O2 2.07E-01 1.50E-01 1.50E-01 0.169 

### Compound:Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber 3 1 1 Mass_mg 0.308 0.299 0.299 0.302 Elb/hr 2.96E-01 2.80E-01 2.80E-01 0.285 lb/mmBtuO2 1.94E-04 1.12E-04 1.12E-04 0.000 mg/dscm 1.37E-01 1.04E-01 1.04E-01 0.115 mg/dscm@7%O2 2.12E-01 1.21E-01 1.21E-01 0.151



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 7 of 13

### Process Run Data



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Bituminous Coal Burned 2351 Tons/hr 0 

### 1 Average Heat Input 2219 MMBtu/hr 0 1 Steam Output 15601000 lb steam/hr 0 1 Synfuel Firing Rate 0 0 

### 1 Petroleum Coke Firing Rate 0 0 1 Coal Gas Firing Rate 0 0 1 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 0 

### 1 Flue Gas Flow Rate 721260 dscfm 0 1 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 0 in H20 0 1 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.7 pH 0 

### 1 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 0 gal/min 0 1 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if applicable) 0 lb/hr 0



### 1 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.75 % 0 1 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 8.3 % 0 1 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 % 0 

### 1 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 0 Deg F 0 1 Flue Gas Pressure 0 atm 0 1 Standard Pressure 1 atm 0 

### 1 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F 0 1 Unit Gross Electrical Output 231.72 MW 0 1 Unit Net Electric Generation 209.95 MWh 0 

### 2 Bituminous Coal Burned 1755 Tons/hr 0 2 Average Heat Input 1657 MMBtu/hr 0 2 Steam Output 11521000 lb steam/hr 0 

### 2 Synfuel Firing Rate 0 0 2Petroleum Coke Firing Rate 0 0 2 Coal Gas Firing Rate 0 0 

### 2Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 0 2 Flue Gas Flow Rate 626116 dscfm 0 2 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 0 in H20 0 

### 2FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.6 pH 0 2 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 0 gal/min 0



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 8 of 13

### APCD Run Data

2 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if applicable) 0 lb/hr 0



### 2Flue Gas Oxygen Content 4.02 % 0 2 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 7.9 % 0 

### 2Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 % 0 2Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 0 Deg F 0 2 Flue Gas Pressure 0 atm 0 

### 2 Standard Pressure 1 atm 0 2 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F 0 2 Unit Gross Electrical Output 177.04 MW 0 

### 2 Unit Net Electric Generation 158.3 MWh 0 3 Bituminous Coal Burned 1541 Tons/hr 0 3 Average Heat Input 1455 MMBtu/hr 0 

### 3 Steam Output 10141000 lb steam/hr 0 3 Synfuel Firing Rate 0 0 3 Petroleum Coke Firing Rate 0 0 

### 3 Coal Gas Firing Rate 0 0 3 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 0 3 Flue Gas Flow Rate 578395 dscfm 0 

### 3 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 0 in H20 0 3 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.8 pH 0 3 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 0 gal/min 0 

### 3 Sorbent Type and Sorbent Injection Rate (if applicable) 0 lb/hr 0

3 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 4.16 % 0 

### 3 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 7.4 % 0 3 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 % 0 3 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 0 Deg F 0 

### 3 Flue Gas Pressure 0 atm 0 3 Standard Pressure 1 atm 0 3 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F 0 

### 3 Unit Gross Electrical Output 159.89 MW 0 3 Unit Net Electric Generation 142.24 MWh 0



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 LOW NOX BURNERS 0 0



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 9 of 13

### Process Lab Run Data

2 LOW NOX BURNERS 0 0 

### 3 LOW NOX BURNERS 0 0 1 OVERFIRE AIR 0 0 2 OVERFIRE AIR 0 0 

### 3 OVERFIRE AIR 0 0 1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR 0 kvolts 0 2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR 0 kvolts 0 

### 3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR 0 kvolts 0 1 CAUSTIC SCRUBBER 0 0 2 CAUSTIC SCRUBBER 0 0 

### 3 CAUSTIC SCRUBBER 0 0

Run Name ValueUOM Comments 1 Fuel Higher Heating Value 10749Btu/lb 1 Fuel Moisture 17 % 

### 1 Fuel Mercury Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Cadmium Content 0 ppm 1 Ultimate/Proximate Analysis 0 

### 1 Fuel Nickel Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Arsenic Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Chromium Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Beryllium Content 0 ppm 

### 1 Fuel Lead Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Manganese Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Chlorine Content 410 ppm 

### 1 Fuel Fluorine Content 45 ppm 2Fuel Higher Heating Value 11506Btu/lb 2 Fuel Moisture 11 % 2 Fuel Mercury Content 0 ppm 

### 2Fuel Cadmium Content 0 ppm 2 Ultimate/Proximate Analysis 0 2 Fuel Nickel Content 0 ppm 

### 2Fuel Arsenic Content 0 ppm 2Fuel Chromium Content 0 ppm 2 Fuel Beryllium Content 0 ppm 2 Fuel Lead Content 0 ppm 

### 2Fuel Manganese Content 0 ppm 2 Fuel Chlorine Content 160 ppm 2 Fuel Fluorine Content 39 ppm



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 10 of 13

### 3 Fuel Higher Heating Value 10684Btu/lb



### 3 Fuel Moisture 15 % 3 Fuel Mercury Content 0 ppm 3 Fuel Cadmium Content 0 ppm 3 Ultimate/Proximate Analysis 0 

### 3 Fuel Nickel Content 0 ppm 3 Fuel Arsenic Content 0 ppm 3 Fuel Chromium Content 0 ppm 

### 3 Fuel Beryllium Content 0 ppm 3 Fuel Lead Content 0 ppm 3 Fuel Manganese Content 0 ppm 3 Fuel Chlorine Content 160 ppm 

### 3 Fuel Fluorine Content 43 ppm

Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 11 of 13

### Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### LocationStack Exit - Method 26A Average Run Number 1 1 2 Test Date 3/23/2010 1/1/2010 3/31/2010 Run Start Time 9:01:00 AM9:01:00 AM12:15:00 PM Run Finish Time 12:28:00 PM12:28:00 PM3:40:00 PM Net Traversing Points 13 13 13 Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.224 0.224 0.224 0.224 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.017 1.017 0.9946 1.010 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.18 29.18 28.78 29.047 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.12 1.12 0.82 1.020 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 106.104 106.104 93.572 101.927 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 89.25 89.25 102.33 93.610 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 101.453 101.453 84.232 95.713 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 349.8 349.8 234.2 311.267 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 16.47 16.47 11.02 14.653 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 13.97 13.97 11.57 13.170 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 13.39 13.39 11.34 12.707 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8661 0.8661 0.8866 0.873 Carbon Dioxide, % 10.2 10.2 7.7 9.367 Oxygen, % 9 9 11.9 9.967 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.8 80.8 80.4 80.667 Fuel Factor 1.17 1.17 1.17 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.99 29.99 29.71 29.897 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.49 28.49 28.42 28.467 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -2 -2 -2 -2.000 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.03 29.03 28.63 28.897 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 124.42 124.42 117.92 122.253 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.5189320006 598230.518932000

6598230.373326858

909137 0.470 Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 43.49 43.49 36.98 41.320 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 363.050 363.050 363.050 363.050 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 719,232.7 719,232.7 624,364.6687,610.000 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 947,342.7 947,342.7 805,535.3900,073.567 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 104.0 104.0 99.4 102.467 Percent Excess Air, % 73.0 73.0 127.6 91.200 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 97809,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 258 258 258 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0 Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 18001,800.000



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 12 of 13

### LocationStack Exit - Method 26A 3 Average

Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Page 13 of 13