alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.1
 
         (a)
    
    10,000,000 preferred shares, par value $.01 per share (the Preferred
Stock), to be issued in series.




---



##### 



(b)
    
    100,000,000 common shares, par value $.01 per share (the
Common Stock).
   (i)
    
    The voting powers, if any, of the holders of stock of such
series;(ii)
    
    The rate per annum and the times and conditions at which the
holders of stock of such series shall be entitled to receive dividends, and
whether such dividends shall be cumulative or non-cumulative and if cumulative
the terms upon which such dividends shall be cumulative;(iii)
    
    The price or prices and the time or times at and the manner
in which the stock of such series shall be redeemable;(iv)
    
    The right to which the holders of the shares of stock of such
series shall be entitled upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Corporation;(v)
    
    The terms, if any, upon which shares of stock of such series
shall be convertible into, or exchangeable for, shares of stock of any other
class or classes or of any other series of the same or any other class or
classes, including the price or prices or the rate or rates of conversion or
exchange and the terms of adjustment, if any; and(vi)
    
    Any other designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof so far as they are not inconsistent with
the provisions of this Restated Certificate of Incorporation and to the full
extent now or hereafter permitted by the laws of Delaware.
   Designation and Amount
 2




---



##### 



Dividends and Distributions
    3




---



##### 



Voting Rights
      4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



Certain Restrictions
      6




---



##### 



Reacquired Shares
  Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up
   7




---



##### 



Consolidation, Merger, etc
  No Redemption
  Ranking
  Amendment
  8




---



##### 



Fractional Shares
          9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ John T. KohlerJohn T. KohlerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
   /s/ Paul R. PetersonPaul R. PetersonSecretary and General Counsel
 12




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS COMPANY




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



TECHNOL
    
    OGY SOLUTIONS COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ Philip J. DowneyPhilip J. DowneyVice President  General Counsel &Corporate Secretary
  3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERRENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                       123
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,474)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,341
<PP&E>                                          46,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,294)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,512
<BONDS>                                          1,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              187
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,472
<SALES>                                         12,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,579
<CGS>                                           11,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  82
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,979)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1  SUBSIDIARIES
OF TAL INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009  Name
  
  JurisdictionTAL International
  Container Corporation
  
  DelawareTrans Ocean Ltd.
  
  DelawareTrans Ocean Container
  Corporation
  
  DelawareSpacewise Inc.
  
  DelawareTAL Advantage I LLC
  
  DelawareTAL Advantage II
  LLC
  
  DelawareTAL Advantage III
  LLC
  
  DelawareTAL International
  Container Pty. Limited
  
  AustraliaTAL do Brasil Investimento de Capital Propio Ltda.
  
  BrazilTAL Sales &
  Marketing Planning (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
  
  ChinaTAL International
  Container (HK) Limited
  
  Hong KongBox Rent, Inc.
  
  DelawareIntermodal Equipment
  Inc.
  
  DelawareTAL International
  Container NV
  
  BelgiumTAL International
  Container SRL
  
  ItalyGreybox Services Ltd.
  
  United KingdomICS Terminals (UK)
  Limited
  
  United KingdomTAL International
  Structured Inc.
  
  Delaware
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 194

Recognizing the contributions of 4–H Clubs and their members to voluntary

community service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1999

Mr. DEAL of Georgia submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of 4–H Clubs and their

members to voluntary community service.

Whereas the American people have a tradition of philanthropy and volunteerism;

Whereas 4–H Clubs, an organization originally established by

the Extension Service of the Department of Agriculture

and land-grant colleges, provide young people in the

United States with the opportunity to actively participate

in volunteer services in their communities that can bridge

the differences that separate people and help solve social

problems;

Whereas there are more than 6,500,000 youth members of 4–

H Clubs in the United States;
2

•HCON 194 IH

Whereas 4–H members touch and enhance the lives of others

during the annual National 4–H Week and throughout

the year by doing good, by giving where there is a need,

by rebuilding what has been torn down, by teaching

where there is a desire to learn, and by inspiring those

who have lost hope;

Whereas 4–H Clubs and their members, as well as other volunteers and Cooperative Extension staff, have joined to

promote the week of October 3 through 9, 1999, as a opportunity for national, collaborated voluntary community

service; and

Whereas voluntary community service is an investment in the

future all Americans must share: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress commends and recognizes

3 4–H Clubs and their members in the United States for

4 their contributions to voluntary community service.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          145652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26937
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                170589
<PP&E>                                          490704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  464869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  203698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           662449
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       3152
<COMMON>                                         20393
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    203698
<SALES>                                          68703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                759421
<CGS>                                            22752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   224707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                585855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (51141)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (51141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   5789
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (48777)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42583

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

SAMUEL CLEVIS EICHLER ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 625

Filed: September 11, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, Latah County. Hon. John R. Stegner , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of fifteen years, for battery with the intent to commit a serious felony and a concurrent unified life sentence, with a minimum period of confinement of fifteen years, for first degree kidnapping, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Samuel Clevis Eichler entered an Alford 1 plea to battery with the intent to commit a

serious felony, I.C. § 18

- 911, and first degree kidnapping, I.C. §§ 18

- 4501(1) and 18

- 4502

. In
exchange for his guilty plea s , additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenc ed

Eichler to a unified term of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of fifteen years,

1 See North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 (1970).2

for battery with the intent to commit a serious felony and a concurrent unified life term, with a

minimum period of confinement of fifteen years, for kid napping

. Eichler appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See St ate v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the lengt h of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretio n.
Therefore, Eichler ’s judgment of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.
Case No. 13,618.

#### SUN. MUT. INS. CO. et al. v. McDOUGAL.

[N. Y. Times,

Feb. 11, 1864.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Arrest in Civil Suit — Second Arrest in Different State.

[One arrested in a civil suit, and going to another state in virtual custody of his bail, may there be arrested in another civil suit, if his bail voluntarily relinquish all claim to his detention.]

[This was a libel by the Sun Mutual Insurance Company and others against Mc-Dougal.]

This was a motion to discharge the defendant from arrest. The libel alleged that the libellants were insurers on the cargo of the schooner Jessie, of which vessel the defendant was master; that the vessel was wrecked in August last on one of the Bahamas; and that the property saved was sold by the defendant, and the proceeds amounted to $5,154 59; and that he refused to pay it over to the libellants, who were entitled to it, but had fraudulently appropriated it. On this libel the defendant was arrested and held to bail in $8,000. The defendant, on an affidavit denying any misappropriation of the funds, and alleging that there were claims for salvage and expenses on the proceeds of the property, and that he had left them in the hands of an agent in the Bahamas to await the settlement of the claims, and that he had been arrested in Boston by a detective and brought here against his will, moved to be discharged from arrest. The libellants read affidavits to show that he was arrested in Boston in another suit brought by one of the owners of the cargo' against him, and that he voluntarily came on here in custody of his bail in that suit, to arrange the matter.

Mr. Fessenden, for libelants.

Mr. Averill, for respondent.

HELD BY THE COURT:

That nothing is shown in the ease preventing the libellants from arresting the defendant in this suit, if he was virtually at the same time in custody of his bail on another civil action, such bail having voluntarily relinquished all claim to his detention. Motion therefore denied, without costs.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William R. Stewart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
                  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
                  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  November 14, 2005

                                                /s/ William R. Stewart
                                                William R. Stewart
                                                Interim Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10593)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4200.

(Decided October 7, 1963)

*Broolcs é Broolcs*for the plaintiff.

*John*IV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the *401merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement herein consists of tires, tubes and rimtapes exported from Holland.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit prices as entered.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to reap-praisement herein may be submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of of the merchandise in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the invoiced unit prices, as entered.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Boyd Clarke, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    C. BOYD CLARKE                               
|                                                    
|C. Boyd Clarke President and Chief Executive Officer



August 7, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                       405
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,816
<PP&E>                                          29,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,777
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,537
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,848
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (653)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
No. 63946.

protests 126219-K, etc. (New York).

#### Wine Shippers Import Corp. *v.*United States,

, Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that .the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
fuel

Formulation ID fuel

Subtype ID RVP sulfur

Level ETOH VolumeMTBE VolumeETBE

VolumeTAME Volumearomatic

Content olefin

Contentbenzene Content e200 3850 12 1023.329 10 0 0 0 19.4554 11.12 0.6605 58.2972 3869 12 1622.448 10 0 0 0 19.6138 11.12 0.5705 61.0491 3870 12 11.2522.951 10 0 0 0 19.5233 11.12 0.62193 59.4766 3871 12 8.823.329 10 0 0 0 19.4554 11.12 0.6605 58.2972 3872 12 14.522.951 10 0 0 0 19.5233 11.12 0.62193 59.4766 3899 12 10.6522.951 10 0 0 0 19.5233 11.12 0.62193 59.4766 20011 20 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0e300 BioDiesel Ester Volume Cetane

Index PAH ContentT50 T90 89.3116 0 0 0 182.883 300.72 92.2464 0 0 0 177.267 287.38 90.5694 0 0 0 180.476 295.003 89.3116 0 0 0 182.883 300.72 90.5694 0 0 0 180.476 295.003 90.5694 0 0 0 180.476 295.003 0 0 0 0 0 0