alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10225 Summary Calendar

W. FOSTER SELLERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

D.D. SANDERS, Warden, Clements Unit; R.L. BRIGGS, Captain, Clements Unit; UNKNOWN PARTIES, working for Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional
Division, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas
(2:97-CV-354)

September 21, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

W. Foster Sellers, a Texas inmate proceeding pro se

, appeals the dismissal

of his civil rights action for failure to prosecute. Our close review of the appellate

record and Sellers’ multiple submissions and contentions inexorably lead us to the

conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Sellers’1 McNeal v. Papasan , 842 F.2d 787 (5 th Cir. 1988).

2 complaint for want of prosecution. 1 No more need be said.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit32**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

 In connection with the Annual Report of ArgyleSecurity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company forthe period certified.

 

 Signed on this 31st day of March, 2008

 
| /s/  Bob Marbut                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Bob  Marbut                                           |   |
| Co-Chief  Executive Officer                           |   |
|                                                  |   |
| /s/  Donald Neville                                   |   |
| Donald  Neville                                       |   |
| Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 23

                       INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-32805, 33-32970, and 333-42769 of Zila, Inc. on Form S-8 and in Registration
Statement Nos. 33-46239, 333-06019, 333-00645 and 333-31651 of Zila, Inc. on
Form S-3 of our report dated December 19, 1997 relating to the Statements of
North American Direct Revenues and Direct Expenses of The Peridex Brand of The
Procter & Gamble Company, appearing in this Form 8-K/A of Zila, Inc.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
----------------------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio

January 14, 1998
Before the Second Division,

May 6, 1963

No. 67681.

#### Wm. Kenyon & Sons (Amer.), Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 283228-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon and cotton transmission rope similar in use to cotton rope and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 32 8- CV K E I T H D AVI S AP P E L L ANT V . FI A CA RD SERV I C ES N . A . A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M CO UN TY CO URT AT LAW NO . 3 OF T ARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- -- O n S e p t e m b e r2 2 , 2 0 0 9 a n d O c t o b e r7 , 2 0 0 9 , w e n o t if ie d a p p e lla n t , in a c c o r d a n c e w it h ru le o f a p p e lla t e p r o c e d u r e 4 2 .3 (c ), t h a t w e w o u ld d is m is s t h is a p p e a l u n l e s s th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e w a s p a i d . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .3 (c ). A p p e l l a n t h a s n o t p a i d th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 5 , 1 2 .1 (b ).2 ... S eeS u p re m e C o u rt o f T e x ., O rde r R eg a rd in gFe e sCh a r

g e d in Civil Cases i n the S uprem e C our tan d the C our ts of A ppeal s and B ef ore the Judi

ci al Panel on M ulti

di str i ct Liti gati on , M i s c . Doc k e t No. 07- 9138 ( Aug. 2 8, 2007 ) (l i s ti n g fe e s i n c o u rts o f a p p e a l s ). 2 Beca us e appe l l anthas f ai l ed t o com pl y w i t h a r equ i r em entof t he r ul es of a pp e l l a t e p r oc e du r e a nd t he Te xa s Su pr e m e Cou r t ’ s or de ro f Aug us t 28, 2007 , 2 w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .3 (c ), 4 3 .2 (f). A ppel l ant shal l pay al l cost s of t hi s appeal , f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. S eeTe x. R. App . P. 43. 4.

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: M EI ER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d L I V I N G STO N , J. DEL I VERE D: Oct ob e r29, 2009
ClassIIDisposalInventoryinEPADirectImplementationProgramsExtractedfromEPAdatabaseon7/29/2014.DateofLastUpdate:3/31/2014AC TA UCTotalAZ0AC=Active Currentlyoperational.AS0TA=TemporarilyAbandonedInactivebutnotplugged.CouldbeintendedtobereopenedorcouldbeawaitingpluggingDC0UC=UnderConstruction Permithasbeenapprovedbutwellhasnotstartedinjection.DrillingcouldbeonholdoruFL 10 4 418HI0IA 33KY 49 30 988MI75926 13798MN0NY 6 1 411PA 8 19TN 11VA 11 112VI0Region5‐tribal 77Region6‐tribal 787 2511038Region8‐tribal 81 3 1498Total 1721 316 46 2083g.underway.
Before the First Division,

November 13, 1967

No. P67/394.

No. P67/395.

No. P67/396.

No. P67/397.

#### Radio Wire Television, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 58/1036, etc. (New York). Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 61/4570 (Cleveland). Nakashima Overseas Corp. et al. *v.*United States, protests 63/1175,, etc. (Los Angeles). Eldon Industries, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/6069, etc. (Los Angeles).

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric*Tools, *Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal L 17/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 17 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5823 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 17

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5823 January 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/68 of 15 October 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle braking requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/68 of 15 October 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle braking requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 370

Calling upon the Government of Turkey to withdraw its armed forces from

the island of Cyprus and to negotiate for the reunification of the Republic

of Cyprus.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 2000

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling upon the Government of Turkey to withdraw its

armed forces from the island of Cyprus and to negotiate

for the reunification of the Republic of Cyprus.

Whereas in 1974, Turkey sent armed forces to Cyprus and

occupied over 36 percent of the island, creating the widespread displacement of Greek Cypriots from the northern

part of the island;

Whereas since 1974, efforts by the United States and the

United Nations to resolve this dispute remain unsuccessful;

Whereas the European Union has commenced accession negotiations with the Government of Cyprus and concluded,

at its December 1999 Helsinki European Council meeting, that, while a political settlement of this dispute
2

•HCON 370 IH

would facilitate the accession of Cyprus to the European

Union, it would not be a precondition for accession;

Whereas accession to the European Union would allow a

united Cyprus to take full advantage of European Union

membership; and

Whereas more than 30,000 Turkish armed forces remain stationed on the island of Cyprus: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that Tur3 key should—

4 (1) withdraw all its armed forces from the is5 land of Cyprus; and

6 (2) negotiate for the reunification of the Repub7 lic of Cyprus on the basis of existing United Nations

8 Security Council resolutions.

Æ
No. P68/45.

protests 286071-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Charles A. Koons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consist of seamless steel tubes with plain square-cut ends made to American Petroleum Institute specifications for grade J-55 steel to be made into couplings for oil well casing the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John A. Steer*Co., *a/c Charles A.*Koons, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 CCPA 81, C.A.D. 911), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of
our report on the financial statements of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. dated
June 30, 1998 in this Current Report on Form 8-K and the incorporation by
reference of our report dated June 30, 1998 into Allied Waste Industries, Inc.'s
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-73618, No.
333-30559 and No. 333-57507), Form S-4 (File No. 333-22575, No. 333-31231, No.
333-35639, 333-52501 and No. 333-60727) and Form S-8 (File No. 33-42354, No.
33-63510, No. 33-79654, No. 33-79756, No. 33-79664 and No. 333-48357). It should
be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of Allied Waste
Industries, Inc. subsequent to December 31, 1997 or performed any audit
procedures subsequent to the date of our report.
 
                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Phoenix, Arizona,
August 26, 1998.
Exhibit 11

                       Statement Regarding Computation of
                               Net Loss per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                                                                    December 31,               December 31,
                                                                ---------------------     ---------------------
                                                                  2000         1999         2000         1999
                                                                --------     --------     --------     --------
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Net loss from continuing operations                             $ (3,773)    $   (669)    $ (6,821)    $ (2,139)
                                                                ========     ========     ========     ========

Net income (loss)                                               $ (3,773)    $    111     $ (6,821)    $   (371)
                                                                ========     ========     ========     ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding-Basic                  15,674       14,933       15,513       14,956
                                                                ========     ========     ========     ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding-Fully diluted          15,674       16,228       15,513       14,956
                                                                ========     ========     ========     ========

Basic net loss per common share from continuing operations(1)   $   (.24)    $   (.04)    $   (.44)    $   (.14)
                                                                ========     ========     ========     ========

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share            $   (.24)    $    .01     $   (.44)    $   (.02)
                                                                ========     ========     ========     ========
</TABLE>

(1) Basic and diluted net loss per common share are the same.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 109

Commending the people of Israel for reaffirming, in its elections, its dedication

to democratic ideals, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1999

Mrs. CAPPS (for herself, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. BERMAN, Mr.

SAXTON, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. OSE, Mr.

FROST, Mr. PORTER, Mr. BONIOR, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. BROWN of California, Mr. MATSUI, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. DIXON, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs.

MEEK of Florida, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. BERRY, Mr. HOLT, Mr. FARR of

California, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. FILNER, Mr.

PAYNE, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH,

Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. MINGE, Mr.

CAPUANO, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HORN, Ms. LEE, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr.

REYES, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. ENGEL,

Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. BENTSEN, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. PHELPS,

Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. KING, Mr. NADLER, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. HALL of

Ohio, Mr. FORBES, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr.

ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr.

LEWIS of Georgia, and Mr. ROTHMAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the people of Israel for reaffirming, in its elections, its dedication to democratic ideals, and for other

purposes.

Whereas since its creation in 1948, Israel has fulfilled the

dreams of its founders who envisioned a vigorous, open,

and stable democracy;
2

•HCON 109 IH

Whereas the centerpiece of Israeli democracy is its system of

competitive and free elections;

Whereas on May 17, 1999, the Israeli people—Israeli Jews

and Israeli Arabs—went to the polls in large numbers in

a remarkably peaceful election; and

Whereas this election is only the latest example of Israel’s

commitment to the democratic ideals of freedom and pluralism, values that it shares with the United States: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress of the United States—

3 (1) commends the people of Israel for reaffirm4 ing, in the May 17 election, its dedication to demo5 cratic ideals;

6 (2) congratulates Ehud Barak on his election as

7 Prime Minister of Israel; and

8 (3) pledges to work with the President of the

9 United States and the new Government of Israel to

10 strengthen the bonds between the United States and

11 Israel and to advance the cause of peace in the Mid12 dle East.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Chief Judge Marsha J. Pechman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CR06-157 MJP

)

v. )

) [PROPOSED]

HENRY C. ROSENAU, ) ORDER EXTENDING TIME

) FOR MOTION RESPONSES

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

This matter having come on before the undersigned Court on motion of the

Government for an extension of time to respond to four defense motions,

Having considered the files and records herein, and the basis set out in the

government’s motion, and considering the fact that the one week extension shall not affect the

current trial date, the Court hereby

GRANTS the motion. The government’s responses are due on September 20, 2011.

So ordered this _____ day of September, 2011.

MARSHA J. PECHMAN

United States Chief Judge

ORDER EXTENDING TIME 

FOR MOTION RESPONSES

ROSENAU/CR06-157 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1291

(206) 553-7970

Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 35-1 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 1
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 280

Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement

Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 2000

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics

Law Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the

Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL

4 OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

5 THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

6 On June 2, 2000, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des9 ignate, the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics

10 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred
2

•HCON 280 IH

1 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

2 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

3 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum4 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co5 lumbia.

6 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

7 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

8 may be necessary to carry out the event.

9 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA10 TIONS.

11 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

12 for physical preparations for the event.

13 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

14 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce15 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

16 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con17 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

18 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli19 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

Æ
Case No. 8,882.

#### McLEAN v. IHMSEN.

[The ease reported under above title in 1 West Law J. 189, is the same as Case No. 8,883.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,658
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,615
<INVENTORY>                                     13,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,354
<PP&E>                                         156,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 553,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,464
<BONDS>                                        260,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   553,905
<SALES>                                        138,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,795
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,897
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Youku Tudou Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Ge Xu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | April 26, 2013    |                    |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------------|
|   |              |                    |
| By:    | /s/ Michael Ge Xu |                    |
|   | Name:             | Michael Ge Xu           |   |
|   | Title:            | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----