alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 52094.

protests 707329-G, etc. (New York).

#### Van B. Moler Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Gregory T. Josefsberg

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00412

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 87179

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Relator Gregory T. Josefsber g f iled a petition for writ of mandamus and a correspond ing

m otion for t emporary re lief to s tay the trial court ’ s order issued on July 2 0, 2021

, pending

adjudication of his p etition for writ of mandamus. W e grant the m oti on for t empor ary r el ief and

s tay th e portion of the trial court ’ s July 20, 2021 order requiring R elator to “ provide answers to

Rachel Ann Roberts ’ [ Rule 202 ] deposition by written questions no later than July 30, 2021

. ”

This order will remain in effect until relato r ’ s pe tition for writ of mandamus is fin a lly decided or

until furt her order from this Co urt.

It is s o ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting individually

Date: July 30, 2021
```

[111th Congress Public Law 98]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3010]]

Public Law 111-98
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To authorize a major medical facility project at the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Walla Walla, Washington, and for other 
             purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 11, 2009 -  [S. 509]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY PROJECT DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
                              AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, WALLA WALLA, 
                              WASHINGTON.

    (a) Authorization for Major Medical Facility Project.--The Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs may carry out a major medical facility project for 
the construction of a new multiple specialty outpatient facility, campus 
renovation and upgrades, and additional parking at the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Walla Walla, Washington, with the 
project to be carried out in an amount not to exceed $71,400,000.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2009 
for the Construction, Major Projects account, $71,400,000 for the 
project authorized in subsection (a).

    Approved November 11, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 509:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            July 15, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 2, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  JIMMY S.H. LEEJimmy S.H. LeeChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6670
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY GERALD WHITE, SR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:03-cr-00375-WDQ) Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 6, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Gerald White, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Gerald White, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of grand jury transcripts pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. White , No. 1:03-cr00375-WDQ (D. Md. Mar. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,990
<PP&E>                                           6,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,131
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,843
<SALES>                                          6,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,989
<CGS>                                            1,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    111
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       111
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: September 9, 2014 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Ray

Saracino , EPA SUBJECT: September 8 , 2014 M eeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 8, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was prop osed on June 2 , 2014
. **ATTENDEES** Dave Emme, NDEP Jasmine Mehta, NDEP Rob Bamford, NDEP Sig Jaunarajs, NDEP Andrew Tucker, NDEP Alaina Burtenshaw, PUCN John Candelaria, PUCN Anne
- Marie Cuneo, PUCN Starla Lacy, NV Energy Dennis Lay

bourn, TS Power Gabrielle Stevens, EPA Amy Z impfer, EPA Ben Machol, EPA Anita Lee, EPA Brian Fisher, EPA Matt Clouse, EPA Chris Sherry , EPA Misha Adamantiades, EPA Jim Ketcham

- Colwill, EPA Jeremy Mark, EPA James Crichfield, EPA Nick Swanson, EPA Ray Saracino, EPA **Attachment**
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 063 4 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 1 6 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **:** 

### G. Keith Noles **Date**

**Branch Manager Date**
**Exhibit 99.9**

 
| **KPMG** LLP          |      |           |
|-----------------------|-----------|----------------|
| Chartered Accountants | Telephone | (403) 691-8000 |
| 2700-205 5 Avenue SW  | Telefax   | (403) 691-8008 |
| Calgary AB T2P 4B9    | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca    |

 

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Tothe board of directors of Penn West Petroleum Ltd., the administrator of PennWest Energy Trust

 

Weconsent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of:

 

·                  our auditors’ report dated March 6, 2008on the consolidated balance sheets of Penn West Energy Trust (the “Trust”) as atDecember 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated statements of income andretained earnings and cash flows for the years then ended;

 

·                  our audit report dated March 6, 2008 onthe supplemental note to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Reconciliationof Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”;

 

·                  our Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm dated March 6, 2008 on the Trust’s internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2007.

 

eachof which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Trust forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Wealso consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in theRegistration Statement (No. 333-145296) on Form F-3 of the Trust.

 

 

CharteredAccountants

 

Calgary,CanadaMarch 26, 2008

 

 

KPMGLLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMGnetwork of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swisscooperative. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.

 

----
Amendment to Executive Life Insurance Program.



 BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 
  
 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K 
  
 EXHIBIT 10.14(a) 
  
 AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE PLAN 
  
 RESOLVED, that the executive life insurance program be modified by removing the $500,000 cap on the amount of insurance
provided to all executives while they are employed so that the amount of insurance shall be two times their annual base salary, and by increasing the retirement coverage for Board-elected officers from $200,000 to $400,000, all subject to compliance
with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 302 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 302

Calling on the people of the United States to observe a National Moment 
of Remembrance to honor the men and women of the United States who died 
                  in the pursuit of freedom and peace.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2000

 Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself and Mr. Murtha) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Calling on the people of the United States to observe a National Moment 
of Remembrance to honor the men and women of the United States who died 
                  in the pursuit of freedom and peace.

Whereas the preservation of basic freedoms and world peace has always been a 
        valued objective of this nation;
Whereas thousands of American men and women have selflessly given their lives in 
        service as peacemakers and peacekeepers;
Whereas greater strides should be made to demonstrate appreciation for these 
        loyal Americans and the ultimate sacrifice they each made;
Whereas Memorial Day is an appropriate day to remember American heroes by 
        inviting the people of the United States to honor these heroes at a 
        designated time;
Whereas Memorial Day needs to be made relevant to both present and future 
        generations of Americans; and
Whereas a National Moment of Remembrance each Memorial Day at 3:00 p.m., local 
        time, would provide the people of the United States an opportunity to 
        participate in a symbolic act of American unity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) calls on the people of the United States to observe a 
        National Moment of Remembrance to honor the men and women of 
        the United States who died in the pursuit of freedom and peace; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to observe such a 
        National Moment of Remembrance.
                                 <all>
```
No. 61655.

#### Skins Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 307214-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Stephen B. Oresman, the Chief Executive Officer of Technology Solutions
Company, certify that:



| | (i) |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Technology Solutions
Company.
| | ---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
    
    November 12, 2003
    
    By:
    
    /s/ STEPHEN B. ORESMANStephen B. OresmanChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Technology Solutions Company and will
be retained by Technology Solutions Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4.11  


Confidential
Materials omitted and filed separately with the

Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions. 



	 
	 	 

	 	 	

 





10
January 2003 


Chris
Efstathiou

VP Global Procurement

Marconi Communications

1000 Fore Drive

Warrendale,

PA 15086-7502

United States of America 


Dear
Chris, 


Global Procurement Agreement of 1st February 2002 between Marconi Communications, Inc.

and Bookham Technology plc ("GPA")  


   



I
am writing to confirm our recent discussions regarding the Marconi minimum purchase commitment under the GPA for the calendar year 2003. We agreed as follows:\ 



	1.
	During
2003 Marconi will place purchase orders to a minimum value according to the following schedule:



	•
	Q1
03: £[**] ($[**])



	•
	Q2
03: £[**] ($[**])



	•
	Q3
03: £[**] ($[**])



	•
	Q4
03: £[**] ($[**])






	2.
	Q1's
minimum purchase commitment of: £[**] ($[**]) will comprise:



	•
	[**]
:                                        £
[**]



	•
	[**]
:                                        £
[**]



	•
	[**]
:                                        £
[**]



	•
	[**]
:                                        £
[**]






	3.
	Marconi
will pay the outstanding balance as shown below by Monday 3rd February 2003:



	•
	Abingdon:        £[**]



	•
	Abingdon:        $[**]



	•
	Paignton:          $[**]









The
payment will be made promptly on or before that day without any delay. 





For
complete clarity, compliance with the above will complete Marconi's minimum purchase obligations under the GPA in full. Also, this letter shall extend the initial term of the GPA to
31st December 2003 and clause 8.1 of the GPA shall be deemed amended accordingly. 






Please
sign below to confirm Marconi's agreement to these terms. 



	/s/  CHRISTOPHER EFSTATHIOU      
	 





Christopher
Efstathiou, VP Global Procurement 


   

    


Yours
sincerely, 



	/s/  STEVE TURLEY      
 Chief Commercial Officer
No. 63470.

protest 58/11062 (New York).

#### Traveler Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artificial flowers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61346, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
23.1









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to incorporate by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-156493) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration Nos. 333-148386, 333-148390, 333-149689, 333-159390 and
333-160249) of our report dated March 3, 2010 relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule and effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of AgFeed Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) which appear
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December, 31
2009.





/s/
Goldman Parks Kurland Mohidin LLP


Goldman
Parks Kurland Mohidin LLP


Encino,
California


April 30,
2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                           1,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (79)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,248
<PP&E>                                           2,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,066
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        120
<COMMON>                                           672
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,898
<SALES>                                         28,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,998
<CGS>                                           20,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       292
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (567)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     780
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

April 19, 1956

No. 59853.

#### Armand Schwab *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 189749-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.