alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of America Service GroupInc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.Dated:May 8, 2007              Name: /s/ Michael W. Taylor   Title:   Senior Vice President &   Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
A90A0246.

#### CAIL v. THE STATE.

(391 SE2d 444)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his convictions of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. *Held:*

1. The victim of the assault was only three years of age at the time of its commission. The defendant complains that, in view of the child’s tender age and the lack of any actual dispute over the nature of his injuries, the state should not have been allowed to exhibit him to the jury for the purpose of displaying the scar from his wound. The victim’s tender age was not, of course, a circumstance for which the state was responsible. “The injuries sustained in an aggravated assault are relevant to that assault and therefore admissible. . . . ‘The Georgia courts have said many times that relevant evidence is not *585subject to an objection that it might inflame the minds of the jury or prejudice the jury and this is true even where the offered evidence is only cumulative.’ ” *Sprouse v. State,*242 Ga. 831, 833 (252 SE2d 173) (1979), quoting from Agnor’s Georgia Evidence, § 10-2, p. 165. This enumeration of error is accordingly without merit.

Decided February 20, 1990.

*William R. Folsom,*for appellant.

*H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Bradfield M. Shealy, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

2. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in charging the jury on the elements of murder. The court gave those instructions in connection with a charge that aggravated assault may be committed by assaulting with intent to murder, rape or rob or by assaulting with a deadly weapon. See OCGA § 16-5-21. The defendant argues that the interjection of the issue of murder into the trial was prejudicial to him because the indictment did not allege an assault with intent to murder but only an assault with a deadly weapon.

This enumeration of error establishes no ground for reversal for two reasons. First, the trial court corrected the asserted error by recalling the jury after they had begun their deliberations and instructing them to confine their considerations “to the indictment as it’s charged here, that is, assault with a deadly weapon. ...” Second, because there was no dispute over the fact that the victim had been shot with a firearm, to the extent the jury may have been misled by the instructions in question they could only have been misled into believing a more stringent standard of proof was required on the issue of criminal intent than was actually the case. “ ‘Appellant cannot complain of a charge which is beneficial to him.’ *Hance v. State,*245 Ga. 856 (4) (268 SE2d 339) (1980).” *Hood v. State,*187 Ga. App. 88 (369 SE2d 348) (1988).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, I, Evan J.
Griffith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(a) This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 12, 2005

                                             /s/ Evan J. Griffith
                                             Evan J. Griffith
                                             Chief Executive Officer
jQuery(document).ready(function() {

    // Jquery is being used to insert some divs and text since the appauth module is in sites/all/modules
    // Wraps AppAuth button in div to add styling
    jQuery( "#user-login-form ul" ).wrap( "<div class='appauth-area'></div>" );
    jQuery( "#user-login-form ul" ).append( "<div class='clear'></div>" );
    jQuery( "#user-login-form ul" ).prepend( "<p class='appauth_subtext'></p>" );
    jQuery( "#user-login-form ul" ).prepend( "<p>Insert your PIV card into your smart card reader.</p><img class='piv' src='/profiles/femad8_gov/themes/fema_uswds/images/icon_piv.jpg' alt='PIV card image' />" );
    jQuery( "div.appauth-area" ).prependTo( "body.page-user div.region-content" );
    jQuery('div.appauth-area').before('<h2 class="h2break piv-login"></h2>');
    // injects variable for text located in html.tpl.php
    // jQuery("p.appauth_subtext").text(AppAuthSubText);
    // jQuery("h2.piv-login").text(PivH2);

    // function to parse the url and if /user?option=legacy the old form is shown
    function getQuery(url){
        var q = (url.split('?')[1]||'').split('&'), o = {};
        for(var i=0;i<q.length;i++){ var p = q[i].split('=');
            if(!!p[0]) o[unescape(p[0])] = unescape(p[1]||'');
        }
        return o;
    }


    // hides legacy login unless path is /user?option=legacy
    if( getQuery(window.location.href).option == "legacy" ){
        jQuery( "form.user-login-form" ).show();
        jQuery( "h2.piv-login, div.appauth-area" ).remove();
    }

    else {
        jQuery( "form.user-login-form .form-item, form.user-login-form #edit-submit" ).remove();
    }

    // hiding dropdown menu until page is loaded
    jQuery('ul.hide-on-load').removeClass('hide-on-load');

});
January 5, 1949

No. 52803.

Suit 4590.

#### United States *v.*H. S. Dorf & Co. of Pa., Inc.

Abstract 52079 reversed November 2, 1948. C. A. D. 392.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 52

Relating to maintaining the current standard behind the ‘‘Made in USA’’

label, in order to protect consumers and jobs in the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 11, 1997

Mr. HOLLINGS (for himself and Mr. ABRAHAM) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Relating to maintaining the current standard behind the

‘‘Made in USA’’ label, in order to protect consumers

and jobs in the United States.

Whereas for the past several decades the ‘‘Made in USA’’

label has defined a product as having all or virtually all

of its parts and labor originating in the United States;

Whereas the people of the United States depend upon the integrity of this label when purchasing products;

Whereas the label projects a sense of pride for American

workmanship and value;

Whereas the Federal Trade Commission has proposed regulations to lower this standard to allow substantial amounts

of a product to be of foreign origin;
2

SCON 52 IS

Whereas lowering this standard will be a misrepresentation to

consumers in the United States who presently believe

products bearing the ‘‘Made in USA’’ label were all or

virtually all made in the United States;

Whereas consumers in the United States are entitled to purchase products with the understanding that the labels on

these products reflect consistent definitions; and

Whereas the Federal Trade Commission is responsible for

safeguarding the consumer from unfair, deceptive, and

fraudulent practices: Now, therefore be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) maintains that the standard for the ‘‘Made

4 in USA’’ label should continue to be that a product

5 was all or virtually all made in the United States;

6 and

7 (2) urges the Federal Trade Commission to re8 frain from lowering this standard at the expense of

9 consumers and jobs in the United States.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7117

ARTHUR MCDORN WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JENNINGS MCABEE; HERBERT B. LONG; JULIUS H.

BAGGETT; FRANK HARRISON; MCABEE BUILDING

SUPPLY, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-95-3555-0-19BD)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur McDorn Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. McAbee, No.

CA-95-3555-0-19BD (D.S.C. June 14, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022345EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 6 September 2022

adopting the Council's position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023

(2022/C 345/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314(3) thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Whereas:

| 1. | On 4 July 2022, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023 (1), |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 4 July 2022, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023 (1),

| 2. | The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the system of own resources of the European Union and repealing Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom (2), and, on the expenditure side, with Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 of 17 December 2020 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 (3). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the system of own resources of the European Union and repealing Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom (2), and, on the expenditure side, with Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 of 17 December 2020 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 (3).

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023 was adopted by the Council on 6 September 2022.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s Internet: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 6 September 2022.

For the Council

The President

M. BEK

---

(1)  COM(2022) 400 final.

1

(2)  OJ L 424, 15.12.2020, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 433 I, 22.12.2020, p. 11.

3

---
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TIMOTHY E. SCOTT,

Petitioner,

v.

NORMAN MALENG, et al.,

Respondents.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-839-JCC-JPD

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE § 2254 PETITION

The Court, having reviewed Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to File and the

balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to File his § 2254 petition (Dkt. No.

31) is GRANTED.

(2) Petitioner’s § 2254 petition is due on or before November 16, 2006.

(3) The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send copies of this Order to the

Petitioner and counsel for the Respondent.

DATED this 31st day of October, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE § 2254 PETITION

Case 2:06-cv-00839-JCC-JPD Document 34 Filed 10/31/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & Commercial ePacket 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & Commercial ePacket 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the 
Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: October 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 16, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & Commercial ePacket Contract 2 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-13 and 
CP2024-13.

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,
Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-23438 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 57

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
      issued honoring the 100th anniversary of the Junior League.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1999

  Mr. Barr of Georgia submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
      issued honoring the 100th anniversary of the Junior League.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a postage 
        stamp honoring the 100th anniversary of the Junior League; and
            (2) the Citizen's Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
-                      -                        -  About 
                      - Newsroom
                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Events 
                      -  Blog 
                      -  Fact Sheets 
                      -  FEMA Live 
                      -  Mobile Products 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Podcast 
                      -  Social Media 
                      -  About Us 
                      -  Reports & Data 
                      -  FEMA in Action 

# 2023 SAFER Application Development Workshop - Recruitment and Retention Activity #2

                            - English 

This FY23 SAFER Recruitment and Retention (R&R) Activity webinar includes a program overview, understanding the application process and tips for preparing to apply. These workshops also provide an opportunity for applicants to ask questions and network with FEMA Preparedness Officers as well as other SAFER R&R applicants and recipients.

**Date:**2024-04-03T18:00:002024-04-03T19:30:00April 3, 2024April 3, 2024

**Time:**6:00 pm - 7:30 pm

**Location:**Virtual

Register

Last updated March 12, 2024

Return to top
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying report on Form 20-F of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 Date: April 6, 2011
    /s/ Angeliki FrangouAngeliki FrangouChief Executive OfficerDate: April 6, 2011
    /s/ George AchniotisGeorge AchniotisChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2005-18 (the "Trust")

I, Joseph A. Lloret, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 31, 2006, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/JOSEPH A. LLORET
      Name:  Joseph A. Lloret
      Title:    Assistant Vice President |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 31, 2006
No. 58349.

protests 185490-K, etc. (New York).

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of toy pianos similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 281, C. D. 1614), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 59359.

protests 246265-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62885.

#### Leslie B. Canion *v.*United States,

protest 58/702 (Galveston).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 440 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 440

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Government of Mexico 
  should adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the 
 Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande Treaty Between the 
                       United States and Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 2000

    Mr. Bonilla (for himself and Mr. Ortiz) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Government of Mexico 
  should adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the 
 Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande Treaty Between the 
                       United States and Mexico.

Whereas the United States and Mexico signed a treaty on water utilization on 
        February 3, 1944, to divide the waters of the Rio Grande and Colorado 
        River systems;
Whereas the treaty required Mexico to deliver a minimum of 350,000 acre feet of 
        water per year on a 5-year average from 6 Mexican tributaries;
Whereas the treaty required the United States to deliver a minimum of 1,500,000 
        acre feet of water per year from the Colorado River;
Whereas the United States has never failed to meet its obligations under the 
        treaty;
Whereas during the period of 1992-1997, Mexico failed to meet its obligations 
        under the treaty by 1,024,000 acre feet;
Whereas a recent study conducted by the Texas A&M University Agriculture Program 
        has determined the economic impact to south Texas from this water loss 
        due to noncompliance with the treaty at $441,000,000 per year; and
Whereas the Government of Mexico has not presented any plan to repay its entire 
        water debt as required by the treaty: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the President of the United States should promptly 
        utilize the full powers of his office to bring about compliance 
        with the 1944 treaty on water utilization in order that the 
        full requirement of water be available for United States use 
        during the next full crop season; and
            (2) the United States Section of the International Boundary 
        and Water Commission should work to bring about full compliance 
        with the 1944 treaty on water utilization and not accept any 
        water debt or deficit repayment plan that does not provide for 
        the full repayment of water owed.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53853.

#### Carl Antholz *v.*United States,

protest 138923-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When this case was called for trial the protest was submitted without the introduction of any evidence in support of the claim made. An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.