alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 14178.

Department Two.

February 8, 1918.]

#### Seattle Merchants Association, *Respondent,*v. Langley State Bank, *Appellant,*W. J. Hunziker *et al., Defendants,*W. J. Wood *et al., Garnishee Defendants.*
      *1*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Island county, Ralston, J., entered January 9, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in garnishment proceedings, tried to the court.

Affirmed.

*Floyd Hatfield,*for appellant.

*Nelson R. Anderson,*for respondent.

Reported in 170 Pac. 560.

Mount, J.

The Langley State Bank appeals from a judgment against it as a garnishee defendant, amounting to $202.73. The statement of facts was heretofore stricken *(Langley State Bank v. Seattle Merchants Ass’n,*98 Wash. 696, 167 Pac. 349), so that the only question left for our consideration is whether the findings support the judgment. *Burleigh v. Consumers Publishing Co.,*95 Wash. 49, 163 Pac. 5.

Upon the issue whether the appellant had in its possession or under its control any property of the principal defendants or was indebted to them, the trial court found, that a judgment had been rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the principal casé, and against the defendants therein, amounting to $2,175.48; that a writ of garnishment was served upon the Langley State Bank upon January 8, 1916; that, on that day, “and on the 27th day of January, 1916, the time .of answer, garnishee defendant Bangley State Bank had and ever since has had and now has in its possession and under its control and was indebted to defendants herein in the sum of $147.43.” From these findings the trial court concluded that the respondent was entitled to a judgment against the appellant in the sum of $147.43, together with interest, and for its costs and disbursements. The judgment was thereupon entered for $202.73, the amount found due, together with costs and interest.

It is too plain for argument that these findings clearly support the judgment, which must therefore be, and the same is, affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., Holcomb, Chadwick, and Morris, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 317

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 8, 2000

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress on the death of John

Cardinal O’Connor, Archbishop of New York.

Whereas His Eminence John Cardinal O’Connor was born

John Joseph O’Connor on January 15, 1920, in southwest Philadelphia, the son of Thomas and Mary O’Connor;

Whereas his duty to God and country led him to serve loyally

as a chaplain in the United States Navy, counseling thou-
2

HCON 317 RDS

sands of brave young men and women during his tenure,

which included tours of duty during the Vietnam War;

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor served the people of the

Archdiocese of New York with honor and distinction for

over 15 years;

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor became an internationally

recognized leader in the field of human rights, working

for peace and justice;

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor was a champion of Catholic schools, particularly in inner-city communities;

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor has always spoken out and

acted to aid the elderly, homeless, working people, the

mentally disabled, and the poor;

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor has provided compassion

through his words and actions and made it known that

everyone was a child of God and was deserving of love,

compassion, and respect;

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor led the Catholic Church in

recognizing the terrible toll of AIDS and opened New

York State’s first AIDS-only unit, at St. Claire’s Hospital;

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor worked tirelessly to

strengthen relations between Catholics and followers of

the Jewish faith, recognizing the power of the interfaith

alliance and leading the Vatican to recognize the State of

Israel; and

Whereas John Cardinal O’Connor was guided in his actions

by the Spirit of the Lord: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—
3

HCON 317 RDS

1 (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the

2 death of His Eminence John Cardinal O’Connor on

3 May 3, 2000, and extends condolences to his family

4 and to the Archdiocese of New York;

5 (2) expresses its profound gratitude to John

6 Cardinal O’Connor and his family for the service

7 that he rendered to his country and his faith; and

8 (3) recognizes with appreciation and respect

9 John Cardinal O’Connor’s commitment to and exam10 ple of faith, love, respect, and dignity for all man11 kind.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 9, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128778 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128778 COA: 254640 Wayne CC: 03-009003-01 RONALD DAVI D JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ap ril 21, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY
, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

s1102 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 9, 2005

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Casa Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry Guo, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, hereby certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

|                |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |   |   |
| Date: March 6, 2018 | By:    | /s/ Jerry Guo |
|                |   | Jerry Guo |
|                |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,852,115
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,140,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                   756,445
<INVENTORY>                                    17,247,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,382,950
<PP&E>                                         672,184,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (241,128,337)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 501,264,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,321,191
<BONDS>                                        307,150,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,766,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   501,264,784
<SALES>                                        103,807,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,807,293
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  79,819,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,986,407
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,526,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,526,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,526,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael R. Cunningham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
                  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
                  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  May 13, 2005

                              /s/ Michael R. Cunningham
                              Michael R. Cunningham
                              Chief Financial Officer
No. 52398.

petition 6213-R (Galveston).

#### Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes and W. R. Zanes & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The petition was dismissed.
No. 57532.

#### Samco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 185931-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hot plate mats of wood the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57261, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

November 2, 1959

No. 63475.

protests 58/8641, etc. (New York).

#### Cresca Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of soup mixes similar in all.material respects to those the subject of *Cresca Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 211, C.D. 1864), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                   HOLOPAK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  THREE MONTHS                     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                               ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,                   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                              1997             1996              1997             1996
                                              ----             ----              ----             ----
<S>                                        <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>
Weighted Average Number of
     Common Shares Outstanding              3,347,689        3,347,689         3,347,689        3,347,689

Common Share Equivalents Based
     Upon the Treasury Stock Method                --           13,307                --           24,372


Total Common Shares and
     Common Share Equivalents
     Outstanding                            3,347,689        3,360,996         3,347,689        3,372,061
                                           ----------       ----------        ----------       ----------

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share and
     Common Share Equivalents:

Continuing Operations                      $     0.02       $    (0.02)       $     0.03       $     0.05
Discontinued Operations                            --            (0.05)               --            (0.05)
                                           ----------       ----------        ----------       ----------
Net Income (Loss)                          $     0.02       $    (0.07)       $     0.03       $     0.00
                                           ==========       ==========        ==========       ==========
</TABLE>




                                       11
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |             |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|----- |  | ----------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: |  | May 5, 2004 |  |  |  | /S/  Kenneth R. Hanks   |  | 
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Kenneth R. Hanks        |  | 
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |
Case Mo. 6,671a.

#### HODSON v. LAKE SHORE & M. R. CO. SAME v. PORTER.

[12 Reporter, *41.]**1*

Circuit Court, N. D. Ohio.

June 13, 1881.

Removal op Causes to Federal Courts — Before Issue Joined — Sulmission op Parties Dependant.

A cause may be removed to the federal court before an answer is made, in an action in which bailees have moved for a substitution of the real parties in interest, and the order of substitution has been entered.

The plaintiffs in these two cases brought suit in replevin for wheat in the common pleas court of Fulton county, Ohio, against the defendant railway company; the railway company disclaimed any ownership in the wheat except as bailees for carriage, but alleged that the other defendants, citizens of New York, claimed the wheat, and prayed that they be substituted as parties defendant in its place, which was done by order of the court under section 5016 of the Code of Ohio (Rev. St. 1880), and the defendants appeared voluntarily and before any answer or other pleading filed petitions and bonds for removal to the circuit court of the United States, under the act of congress of March 3, 1S75 [18 Stat. 470]. Plaintiffs filed motions to remand the same in the circuit court, on the ground that no “controversy” existed at ■the time of removal, there being no answer or other pleading contesting the right of the plaintiffs to the wheat; that the statement that a controversy existed in the petition for removal was r.-t sufficient, that it must appear from the pleadings that there was a controversy. ,

Gilbert Harmon, for plaintiffs.

George Haynes and Smith & Geddes, for defendants.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

WELKER, District Judge.

Though there are no decisions in the federal courts directly upon this point, yet many cases are to be found in the reports where the removals were had before any answer on the part of the defendants had been made; and the failure of the several judges to notice such a defect is equivalent to an opinion that it is not fatal to the removal and subsequent jurisdiction of the court. Motion overruled.
No. 64661.

#### J. J. Boll et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/33854, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of recording tapes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, David M. Mulder, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Salton, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Salton, Inc.

                                        By: /s/ David M. Mulder
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            David M. Mulder
                                            Executive Vice President, Chief
                                            Administrative Officer and
                                            Senior Financial Officer

May 11, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Salton, Inc. and will be retained by Salton, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23574]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2000-7257, Notice No. 95]

Railroad Safety Advisory Committee; Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Announcement of charter renewal of the Railroad Safety Advisory 
Committee (RSAC).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA announces the charter renewal of the RSAC, a Federal 
Advisory Committee established by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation 
in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act to provide 
information, advice, and recommendations to the FRA Administrator on 
matters relating to railroad safety. This charter renewal will be 
effective for two years from the date it is filed with Congress.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenton Kilgore, RSAC Designated 
Federal Officer/RSAC Coordinator, FRA Office of Railroad Safety, 202-
365-3724.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided in accordance with 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. app. 2). 
RSAC comprises 51 representatives from 26 organizations, representing 
various rail industry perspectives. The diversity of the committee 
ensures the requisite range of views and expertise necessary to 
discharge its responsibilities. Please see the RSAC website for 
additional information at https://rsac.fra.dot.gov/.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Amitabha Bose,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-23574 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P