alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James B. Hawkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ JAMES B. HAWKINSPrint Name: James B. HawkinsTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 9, 2008


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Murphy, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ STEVEN J. MURPHYPrint Name: Steven J. MurphyTitle: Vice President Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 9, 2008
No. 58358.

protest 178892-K (New York).

#### Acrow, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of building shores, jacks, or struts the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to entry 826013.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-2003V

UNPUBLISHED

DIANE D’AMICO,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: June 8, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Damages Decision Based on Proffer; 

Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder 

Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On December 30, 2019, Diane D’Amico filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a flu vaccine administered on September 28, 2018. 

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of 

Special Masters.

On June 8, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to 

compensation for SIRVA. On June 8, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of 

compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $77,756.70. Proffer at 

4. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated 

in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum 

payment of $77,756.70 (representing $75,000.00 for pain and suffering and 

$2,756.70 for unreimbursed vaccine-injury-related expenses) in the form of a check 

payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would 

be available under § 15(a). 

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bradley W.
Evans, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:
 
 (1)
                the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and
 
 (2)
                the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 
 Date:
      November 13, 2009
              /s/ Bradley W. EvansBradley
      W. EvansChief
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATIONS


I, Troy L. Carson, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Hercules Offshore, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.





Date: April 29, 2016





By:/s/ Troy L. CarsonTroy L. CarsonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Before the Third Division,

August 14, 1957

No. 61142.

protest 292760-K (New York).

#### Haruta & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
March 24, 1959

No. 62901.

#### Bel-Art Products *v.*United States,

protest 58/1746.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Docket No. FAA-2011-1230
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 222

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the assassination of Armenian Prime

Minister Vazgen Sargsian and other officials ofthe Armenian Government and expressing thesense of the Congress in mourning this tragicloss of the duly elected leadership of Armenia.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 222

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on October 27, 1999, several armed individuals

broke into Armenia’s Parliament and assassinated the

Prime Minister of Armenia, Vazgen Sargsian, the Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Karen Demirchian, the

Deputy Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Yuri

Bakhshian, the Minister of Operative Issues, Leonard
2

•HCON 222 EH

Petrossian, and other members of the Armenian Government;

Whereas Armenia is working toward democracy, the rule of

law, and a viable free market economy since obtaining its

freedom from Soviet rule in 1991; and

Whereas all nations of the world mourn the loss suffered by

Armenia on October 27, 1999: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) deplores the slaying of the Prime Minister

4 of Armenia, Vazgen Sargsian, the Chairman of the

5 Armenian Parliament, Karen Demirchian, the Dep6 uty Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Yuri

7 Bakhshian, the Minister of Operative Issues, Leon8 ard Petrossian, and other members of the Armenian

9 Government struck down in this violent attack;

10 (2) strongly shares the determination of the Ar11 menian people that the perpetrators of these vile

12 acts will be swiftly brought to justice so that Arme13 nia may demonstrate its resolute opposition to acts

14 of terror;

15 (3) commends the efforts of the late Prime

16 Minister and the Armenian Government for their

17 commitment to democracy, the rule of law, and for

18 supporting free market movements internationally;

19 and
3

•HCON 222 EH

1 (4) continues to cherish the strong friendship

2 between Armenia and the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives November 16,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
A89A2301.

#### MAZ MEDICS, INC. v. SATELLITE ADVERTISING SYSTEMS, INC.

(391 SE2d 446)

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellee-plaintiff contracted to produce and have aired certain television commercials for appellant-defendant’s business. The contract contained a liquidated damages provision and, after appellant breached the contract, appellee brought suit. The trial court, sitting as the trior of fact, found that the liquidated damages provision of *584the contract was enforceable. Judgment was entered for appellee and appellant appeals from that judgment.

Decided February 20, 1990.

*Charles L. Day,*for appellant.

*Steven M. Youngelson, Leslie J. Cardin,*for appellee.

1. Appellant enumerates the general grounds, urging that the contractual provision for liquidated damages is an unenforceable penalty.

“[A]t trial, the burden is on the defaulting party to show that the provision is a penalty. [Cit.] . . . [T]he enforceability of a liquidated-damages provision in a contract is a question of law for the court. . . which necessarily requires the resolution of questions of fact.” *Liberty Life Ins. Co. v. Thomas B. Hartley Constr. Co.,*258 Ga. 808, 809 (375 SE2d 222) (1989). The evidence authorized the trial court to find that appellee’s damages would be difficult to assess with accuracy, that the parties’ intent was to provide for damages rather than a penalty, and that the amount specified was a reasonable pre-estimation of appellee’s probable loss. *Southeastern Land Fund v. Real Estate World,*237 Ga. 227, 230 (227 SE2d 340) (1976). See also *Daniels v. Johnson,*191 Ga. App. 70, 71 (1) (381 SE2d 87) (1989).

2. Appellant’s second enumeration of error regarding the trial court’s award of prejudgment interest is without merit. OCGA § 7-4-15; *Considine Co. of Ga. v. Turner Communications Corp.,*155 Ga. App. 911, 915 (6) (273 SE2d 652) (1980).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*
Exhibit
10-c


 


THIRD AMENDMENT

OF

ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

401(k) EXCESS PLAN

(2002 Restatement)


 


WHEREAS, ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Minnesota
corporation (the “Principal Sponsor”), by resolution of its Board of Directors,
has heretofore established and maintained a nonqualified, unfunded, deferred
compensation and supplemental retirement plan for the benefit of a select group
of management or highly compensated eligible employees (the “Plan”), which in
its most restated form, is embodied in a document entitled “ADC
TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 401(k) EXCESS PLAN (2002 Restatement),” as amended by
two amendments (hereinafter collectively referred to the “Plan
Statement”),  and


 


WHEREAS, The Retirement Committee of ADC
Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Committee”) has been delegated the power to make
further amendments of the Plan Statement which do not materially increase the
cost of the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, On September 4, 2002 but effective January 1,
2003, the Committee adopted a resolution removing the Plan’s eligibility
grandfathering provision applicable to certain employees who were eligible to
participate in the Plan before November 1, 2000 (as embodied in Section 2.2 of
the Plan Statement).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, The Plan Statement is hereby amended
consistent with the Committee’s resolution:


 


1.                 REMOVAL OF GRANDFATHERING PROVISION FOR
ELIGIBILITY.  Effective for Plan Years
beginning on or after January 1, 2003, Section 2.2 of the Plan Statement shall
be deleted in its entirety without replacement.  Employees who are eligible to participate in this Plan pursuant
to Section 2.2 shall become subject to the automatic cancellation rules in
Section 2.4 for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2003.


 


2.                 SAVINGS CLAUSE. 
Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan Statement
shall continue in full force and effect.
UNITED  STATES

                      SECURITIES  AND  EXCHANGE  COMMISSION
                          Washington,  D.C.  20549


                                FORM  10-QSB


[  X  ]  QUARTERLY  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13  OR  15(D)  OF  THE
         SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934

         For  the  quarterly  period  ended  May 31, 2001

OR

[    ]  TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13  OR  15(D)  OF  THE
     SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934

For  the  transition  period  from  to

Commission  file  number             0-25489

                          NEVADA  STAR  RESOURCE  CORP.
                          -----------------------------
Yukon  Territory  Canada                              91-0239195
---------------------------------------------      ---------------------
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation      (I.R.S. Employer
or  organization)                                  Identification  No.)

10735  Stone  Avenue  North
Seattle,  WA                                                    98133
----------------------------------------------            --------------
(Address  of  principal  executive  offices)                (Zip  Code)

                                 (206)  367-2525
                ---------------------------------------------------
                (Issuer's  telephone  number,  including  area  code)

Check  whether  the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13  or  15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period  that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.  Yes  No    X

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity,  as  of  the  latest  practicable  date. 30,508,470

Transitional  Small  Business  Disclosure  Format  (check  one);
Yes      No  X











<PAGE>
                         NEVADA  STAR  RESOURCE  CORP.
                                 FORM 10-QSB
           FOR  THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED  May 31, 2001


                         PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The  Registrant  falls  within  the  provisions  of  Rule  13a-13(c)(2)  of  the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934, as amended, and claims exemption thereunder
from  the  requirement  to  file  Part  I.

                            PART II OTHER INFORMATION

All  Items  Omitted  As  Not  Applicable.


                                    SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, the
registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed on its behalf by the
undersigned  thereunto  duly  authorized.


     NEVADA  STAR  RESOURCE  CORP.


BY:  /s/ Monty D. Moore                            Date:  07-30-2001
       Monty  D.  Moore,
       President  and  Principal
       Financial  Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

The Greenbrier Companies
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Year ended August 31,
                                                            ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                              2002        2003        2004         2005        2006
                                                            ---------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Earnings (loss) before income tax, minority interest and
  equity in unconsolidated subsidiaries                     $(47,230)   $ 10,758    $ 31,194     $ 50,000    $ 61,065

Interest expense                                              19,055      14,489      11,553       14,000      26,985
Estimated interest portion of rent expense                     6,287       6,136       5,388        5,591       6,465
                                                            ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                            $(21,888)   $ 31,383    $ 48,135     $ 69,591    $ 94,515
                                                            =========================================================

Fixed charges                                               $ 25,342    $ 20,625    $ 16,941     $ 19,591    $ 33,450

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             (0.86)       1.52        2.84         3.55        2.83
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# AGENCY:

United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

# ACTION:

Notice of public availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        Acting in compliance with section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, requiring civilian agencies to prepare and analyze inventories of their service contracts, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2022 Service Contract Inventory found at                         *https://www.acquisition.gov/​content/​service-contract-inventory,*                         and the posting of the Analysis of Service Contract Inventory for FY 2021 and the Planned Analysis of the FY 2022 Inventory found at:                         *https://www.usaid.gov/​results-and-data/​budget-spending/​official-service-contract-inventory.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding the service contract inventory should be directed to Eileen Simoes, Chief, Policy Division, Bureau for Management Policy, Budget and Performance, U.S. Agency for International Development, (202) 921-5090,                         *esimoes@usaid.gov*.                    

Susan C. Radford,

Management and Program Analyst, Bureau for Management Policy, Budget and Performance, U.S. Agency for International Development.

[FR Doc. 2023-23336 Filed 10-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
IV

House Calendar No. 191

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 280

[Report No. 106–543]

Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement

Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 2000

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

MARCH 23, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics

Law Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the

Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 280 RH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL

2 OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

3 THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

4 On June 2, 2000, or on such other date as the Speak5 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

6 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des7 ignate, the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics

8 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred

9 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

10 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

11 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum12 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co13 lumbia.

14 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

15 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

16 may be necessary to carry out the event.

17 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA18 TIONS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

20 for physical preparations for the event.

21 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

22 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce23 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

24 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con25 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations
3

•HCON 280 RH

1 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli2 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

House Calendar No. 191

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 280

[Report No. 106–543]

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special

Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run to be runthrough the Capitol Grounds.

MARCH 23, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed