alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Hughes, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Boulder Specialty Brands,
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Boulder Specialty Brands, Inc.

Dated: March 31, 2006



/s/ Stephen B. HughesStephen B. HughesChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
No. 58790.

protest 242586-K (New York).

#### Kittay & Blitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

The motion to dismiss was granted.
BOARD ClF GOVERNORS 

OF" THE 

FEOERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

WASHINGTON, O. Co 20S51 

Ms. Shaheen F. Dil 

Chief Performance Officer 

249 5th Ave 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707 

Dear Ms. Dil: 

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE 

TO THE BOARD 

November 18, 2009 

This is in response to your letter dated June 24,2009, requesting on behalf 

of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. ("PNC"), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to 

extend by one year, until January 1,2013, its first floor period start date under the 

implementation requirements of the Board's advanced approaches capital 

adequacy framework for bank holding companies ("advanced approaches,,).l 

The advanced approaches are mandatory for any bank holding company 

with consolidated total assets equal to or more than $250 billion? The advanced 

approaches generally provide that a bank holding company must adopt a written 

implementation plan no later than six months after the date that the bank holding 

company became subject to the advanced approaches, and the implementation plan 

must incorporate a first floor period start date no later than thirty-six months after 

this date.3 A bank holding company must begin its parallel run period at least one 

year before its first floor period start date.4 The Federal Reserve may extend the 

first floor period start date. 5 

1 See 12 CFRpart 225, Appendix G, section 21(a)(1). 

2 12 CFRpart 225, Appendix G, section l(b)(1)(i). 

3 Id. 

4 See 12 CFR part 225, Appendix G, section 21(c). 

5 12 CFRpart 225, Appendix G, section l(b)(1)(i). 
- 2-

PNC's consolidated assets exceeded the $250 billion threshold for 

mandatory adoption of the advanced approaches as of December 31, 2008, when it 

acquired National City Corporation ("NCC") (assets of$143.7 billion as of 

September 30,2008), Cleveland, Ohio. Consequently, PNC's implementation plan 

is required to incorporate a parallel run start date of no later than January 1,2011, 

and a first floor period start date of no later than January 1,2012. In your letter, 

you described key challenges that could hinder the successful completion ofPNC's 

implementation plan within the time frame required by the advanced approaches, 

including resource constraints related to the acquisition ofNCC. 

Based on all the facts of record, including the information provided in your 

request and other supervisory information, the Board grants PNC's request to 

extend its first floor period start date by one year, until J 1,2013. The 

Board believes this extension is based 

focus resources on the NCC integration before completing its advanced approaches 

implementation plan. This action does not relieve PNC of any of its other 

regulatory capital requirements. 

Please contact Andrew Willis, Financial Analyst, Division of Banking 

Supervision and Regulation, at (202) 736-5635 if you have any questions. 

Sincerely yours, 

Robert deY. Frierson 

Deputy Secretary of the Board 

cc: Michael D. Coldwell, Supervisory Examiner 

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                           DATAWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                       One Canal Park, Cambridge, MA 02141


Jeffrey O. Nyweide
112 Pinckney Street #16
Boston, MA  02114

Dear Jeff:

This is an amendment to the Agreement between you and Dataware Technologies,
Inc. dated February 24, 2000 (the "Agreement").

Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, you agree that you
will not have the right to exercise your outstanding stock options under the
Dataware Technologies, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan on a "net exercise" basis as
described in the Agreement. However, instead of that, you shall have the right
to pay the exercise price for your options by tendering shares of common stock
that have been owned by you for at least six months, in lieu of paying the
exercise price in cash. The shares you tender shall be valued for this purpose
at their fair market value (defined as the closing price per share on the last
trading day prior to the date of exercise). For this purpose, the options will
be deemed to be exercised on the date you tender both the shares and a notice of
exercise to Dataware.

Except as amended hereby, the Agreement will continue in force. Please sign the
enclosed copy of this letter and return it to me to indicate your agreement with
the terms of this amendment.

Sincerely,

/s/ David Mahoney

David Mahoney
President and Chief Executive Officer

Agreed and accepted.



/s/ Jeffrey O. Nyweide                                  April 18, 2000
-------------------------------------                   --------------
Jeffrey O. Nyweide                                      Date
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23385]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-091]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed October 6, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through October 16, 2023 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230138, Final, USACE, CO, Halligan Water Supply Project, 
Review Period Ends: 11/22/2023, Contact: Cody S. Wheeler 720-922-3846.
EIS No. 20230139, Draft, BLM, OR, Hult Reservoir and Dam Safety, 
Comment Period Ends: 12/7/2023, Contact: Dianne Olson 971-213-4970.
EIS No. 20230140, Final, USACE, MS, Memphis Metropolitan Stormwater 
North DeSoto County Feasibility Study, DeSoto County, Mississippi, 
Review Period Ends: 11/22/2023, Contact: Joshua Koontz 901-544-3975.
EIS No. 20230141, Draft, USACE, FL, North of Lake Okeechobee Storage 
Reservoir Section 203 Study, Comment Period Ends: 12/7/2023, Contact: 
Dr. Gretchen Ehlinger 904-232-1665.
EIS No. 20230142, Draft Supplement, BLM, AK, Ambler Road Draft 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 12/
22/2023, Contact: Stacie McIntosh 907-378-3815.

    Dated: October 16, 2023.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-23385 Filed 10-19-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATIONS(cont’d)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS****ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the annual report of The GreenbrierCompanies, Inc. (the Company) onForm 10-K for theannual period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified(the Report), I, Joseph K. Wilsted, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.Date: October 31, 2006/s/ Joseph K. Wilsted Joseph K. WilstedSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerThe Greenbrier Companies 2006AnnualReport                                         71
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TAEVON MAURICE CARR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 417 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GORACING.COM, INC. FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED FILED FOR THE
PURPOSE OF SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 18 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH
SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING WHICH INCORPORATES
THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT BY REFERENCE, UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY
INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      287
<ALLOWANCES>                                        75
<INVENTORY>                                      6,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,296
<PP&E>                                           1,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                     418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           3
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,386
<SALES>                                         20,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,199
<CGS>                                            9,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,289
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ABDELMONIEM ABDALLA,

Respondent

v.

EMADADDIN ALGARF,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 423 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

 

SUBJECT: October 14, 2009 Meeting with Denso 

FROM: Brian Nelson 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472 

DATE: March 15, 2010 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

On October 14, 2009, we met with Denso to discuss air conditioning-related topics in the 

September 28, 2009 Proposed Rulemaking To Establish Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Emission 

Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy. Topics included a general discussion of credits 

for reducing refrigerant leakage, credits for improving air conditioning system efficiency, and the 

A/C CO2 Idle Test. 

Denso also provided an electronic copy of the slides they presented at this meeting. This 

document is titled “EPA_Oct_14_2009_ver_3.pdf” and is an attachment to this docket entry. 

Attendees from Denso were: 

Brad Brody 

Jonathan Goodfellow 

Kwangtaek Hong 

Bryan Styles 

Attendees from EPA were: 

Tony Fernandez 

Brian Nelson
EPA Reg. No. 69526-4

Vol. 1 – part 2
No. 56221.

protests 173363-K, etc. (New York).

#### Raymond Abrahams et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as watch movements more than -Ho of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23
-0 575

_________________ R. Held, et al., Plaintiff s and Appellees , O R D E R
v. State, et al. , Defendants and Appellants .

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing Montana Interfaith Power and Light ’ s amicus brief filed electronically on April 3 , 2024, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below
-referenced Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 11 (4)(a) requires that an amicus brief shall not exceed 5,000 words. Montana Interfaith Power and Light ’ s certificate of compliance states that the amicus brief word count does not exceed 10,000 words. The amicus brief ’ s actual total word count is 7,956, not including the table of contents, table of citations, certificate of service, certificate of compliance, or any appendix
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order Montana Interfaith Power and Light shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a 04/04/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0575revised brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule and that

they shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to Montana Interfaith Power and Light and to all parties of record.

Electronically signed by: Ingrid Gustafson Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 4 2024
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Honorable Fiobert P. ratlen. Jr., Fag0 4 
841 

IIonorabls Eobert F. lidden, Jr., -age S 

Article 654 or the.Penal Code of Texas read8 a8 

follows: 

"If any parson ehall establlrh a lottoay 

or dlspoee or any estate, real or pms~nal, by 

lottery, he 8hall b4 riasa not 144s.than on* 

hundmi; DDr more than onb thousand dollam; or 

ii any pbr8on 8ha11 ~11, Oifbr ror .8mXb, or kbop 

ror 84&i any ticket or part tlak8t in.any lottery, h4 ehall be iinsd not 10~s than t&n nor 

sore than f1ft.y d6llara.” 

The ca% of F4atheratqrg v. Itidaymd4nt ,Servi4q 

Station A8SOCtiS&.iOn, 10 5. ~W. t&s) 184, ~SlteQ by ytaa ln 

your bar, dbrinb.6 a lottery .a6 rollw6: 

*A lottbry for all praotioai 'purposes may 

hb definctU.ae any UOhbmb far $hb dlcitributlon 

of prOma, by Lot ~41 QhanQs, whw8 4heoff paying #iOnby Ol' giViryJ othor 'thlngS Of~ral.VB ka 

anethe obtains a tbkbn whioh bntftles ,hia to 

raaeivb a larger or sma1Lor value or ,mthlng, 

am mom rormula or 0haneb map detbrinLns.* 
Rankable Robert r. Peden, Jr., page 4 

You are respeatful.ly adrlaed that It 15 the 

opinion of this Department that under the authorltles 

cited above, the *Aae8 Quiz NlghW~ rokyune or plan, ia a 

mI.otterya and in violation of Artiols 654, Pendl Code OS 

Texan. 

Trusting that this satl8faotorily answer8 your 

inqulq, we are 

Very truly yours 

ATTORNZY GENERAL OF'TEXAS 

APPROVEDA% 12, 1939 

ATTORI?EY GENERALOF TEXAS
Exhibit 21.1
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC
 Subsidiary Name
    
    State/Country of OrganizationAirport & MRO Facilities Nigeria Ltd.
    
    NigeriaDCH Limited
    
    United KingdomDI Aerospace Integrated Solutions Ltda
    
    ColombiaDI
Air Colombia SAS
    
    ColombiaDIV Capital Corporation
    
    DelawareDTS Aviation Services LLC
    
    NevadaDynCorp Aerospace Operations LLC
    
    DelawareDynCorp Aerospace Operations (UK) Ltd.
    
    United KingdomDynCorp (Aust.) Pty. Limited
    
    AustraliaDynCorp International Private Limited
    
    SingaporeDynCorp International Services LLC
    
    VirginiaDynCorp International Services GmbH
    
    GermanyDyn Marine Services LLC
    
    CaliforniaDyn Marine Services of Virginia LLC
    
    VirginiaGlobal Linguist Solutions LLC
    
    DelawareServices International LLC
    
    DelawareWorldwide Humanitarian Services LLC
    
    DelawareWorldwide Recruiting and Staffing Services LLC
    
    Delaware
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Randel G. Owen, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of Emergency Medical Services L.P.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: May 2, 2011

 
| /s/ Randel G. Owen |                                                      |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:              | Randel   G. Owen                                          |   |
| Title:             | Chief   Financial Officer                                 |   |
|               | Emergency   Medical Services Corporation, as              |   |
|               | general   partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P. |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 27 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.27
                                     Agreed to February 12, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, February 
12, 1999, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 23, 
1999, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Thursday, February 11, 1999, Friday, 
February 12, 1999, Saturday, February 13, 1999, or Sunday, February 14, 
1999, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, pursuant to this concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Monday, February 22, 1999, or such time on that 
day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the 
motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```