alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       

<ARTICLE>                                                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Rosecap,
Inc. financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety be reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        1,026
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              1,026
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                1,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         930
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      88
<OTHER-SE>                                                    8
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  1,026
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              5,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (5,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (5,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (5,468)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.06)
        


</TABLE>
No. 66174.

#### The Brabant Needle Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/302 and 61/307 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of needle wrappers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 63395, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Utah

                  -                      -                        -                          -                            -  Regions, States & Territories 
                          - Region 8
                          -  Region 8 
                          -  Utah 
                          -  Colorado 
                          -  Montana 
                          -  North Dakota 
                          -  Play the Disaster Game 
                          -  South Dakota 
                          -  Wyoming 
                          -  Region 1 
                          -  Region 2 
                          -  Region 3 
                          -  Region 4 
                          -  Region 5 
                          -  Region 6 
                          -  Region 7 
                          -  Region 9 
                          -  Region 10 
                          -  Tribes 
                  -  Regions, States and Territories 
                  -  Tribes 
                  -  Region 1 
                  -  Region 2 
                  -  Region 3 
                  -  Region 4 
                  -  Region 5 
                  -  Region 6 
                  -  Region 7 
                  -  Region 8 
                  -  Colorado 
                  -  Montana 
                  -  North Dakota 
                  -  South Dakota 
                  -  Utah 
                  -  News, Media & Events 
                  -  Risk Reduction 
                  -  Contact & About 
                  -  Wyoming 
                  -  Region 9 
                  -  Region 10 

                            - English
                            - Español

On This Page

Declared DisastersActive - Apply for Assistance

Emergency Response Resources

Disaster Recovery Centers

More About This Location

News, Media & EventsEvents | Preparedness Tips | Press Releases & Fact Sheets | PDFs & Multimedia

Risk ReductionFind Your Flood Map | Minimize Local Risk | Environmental Requirements

Contact & AboutContacts | Federal Funding Data | Employment Opportunities

## Declared Disasters

Utah Flooding (DR-4752-UT)

Incident Period: May 1, 2023 - May 27, 2023

Major Disaster Declaration declared on December 23, 2023

Utah Parleys Canyon Fire (FM-5408-UT)

Incident Period: August 14, 2021 - August 18, 2021

Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on August 14, 2021

Utah Pack Creek Fire (FM-5391-UT)

Incident Period: June 9, 2021 - June 26, 2021

Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on June 10, 2021

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast » 

## Emergency Response Resources

Be Ready Utah

Inciweb – Incident Information System

Utah Department of Public Safety

Utah Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency Management

Utah Office of the Governor

Utah State and Local Referrals

Utah Wildfire Info

## Disaster Recovery Centers

There are no active Disaster Recovery Centers for this location at this time.

Return to top
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7705

MICHAEL RAY HARVEY, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden; CAPTAIN DAVIS, C.C.A.; D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, ROSP; PAUL WILLIAMS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; R. FLEMING, Major; J. K. VAUGHN; R. T. COKER; V. SMITH, Doctor; RUFUS FLEMING; DOCTOR KING; DAVID A. SMITH, Assistant Warden, H.C.C.; J. REDD, Segregation Counselor, H.C.C., Defendants - Appellees, and
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUTLER; V. L. EVANS; WILLIAM RODGERS, Regional Administrator, Central Region, VDOC; L. DOTSON, Warden, L.C.C.; S. FLEENOR, Grievance Coordinator at ROSP, VDOC; JOHN DOE, I, person named unknown at C.C.A., VDOC, employee at C.C.A. charges with duty of disciplinary hearings; JOHN DOE, II, person named unknown at C.C.A., VDOC, employee at C.C.A. charges with duty of Ombudsman for D.O.C.; JOHN DOE, III, person named unknown at C.C.A., employee head of medical staff; JOHN DOE, IV, person unknown at VDOC, Director of Medical Services and Medical Policy of D.O.C., Defendants.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-829-7) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: April 4, 2003 Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Ray Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Michael Ray Harvey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harvey v. Mahon , No. CA02-829-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2004118EN.01003601.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/36

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(First Chamber)

of 21 April 2004

in Case T-172/01 M v Court of Justice of the European Communities (1)

1

(Spouse divorced from a former member of a Community institution, since deceased - Maintenance - Verbal agreement between the former spouses - Law applicable to the formal requirements for the agreement and the admissibility of the means of proving its existence (Article 27 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of the European Communities))

(2004/C 118/75)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-172/01, M, resident in Athens (Greece), represented by G. Vandersanden and H. Tagaras, lawyers, against the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Agent: M. Schauss, assisted by T Papazissi) – application for annulment of the refusal to grant a survivor's pension based on the service of her ex-husband – the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of: A.W.H. Meij, President, and N.J. Forwood and H. Legal, Judges; Registrar: I Natsinas, gave a judgment on 21 April 2004, in which it:

| 1. | rejected the application; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

rejected the application; and

| 2. | ordered each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

ordered each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 10.11.2001

1

---
Before the Second Division,

October 17, 1958

No. 62369.

#### Henry Pollak, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 170008-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Pollak Industrial Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 251, C. D. 1991), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. R66/19.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisement R61/7084 (Houston).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban*Company, *Inc.*v. *United*States, 52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851, the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f.o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 365 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 365

 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding liability of Japanese 
 companies to former prisoners of war used by such companies as slave 
                       labor during World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2000

Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
     Cunningham, and Mr. Wolf) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding liability of Japanese 
 companies to former prisoners of war used by such companies as slave 
                       labor during World War II.

Whereas Japan captured and interned 36,260 American prisoners of war during 
        World War II;
Whereas 37.3 percent of those Americans who were placed in Japanese prisoner-of-
        war camps died during their imprisonment;
Whereas Americans captured and interned by the Japanese were forced to work for 
        privately held Japanese companies in severe slave-like conditions, with 
        very little food, dangerous work environments, and no medical care;
Whereas survivors of Japanese prisoner-of-war camps continue to suffer long-term 
        health consequences due to their imprisonment;
Whereas the companies that benefitted from the forced labor of American and 
        other nations' prisoners of war continued to earn a profit during 
        wartime and beyond; and
Whereas, in contrast to other countries that participated in horrific war crimes 
        during World War II, the Government of Japan has refused to fully 
        acknowledge the crimes it committed, as well as those committed by 
        privately held Japanese companies during World War II, and to provide 
        full reparations to the victims of these actions: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that privately owned Japanese 
companies that used prisoners of war as slave labor during World War 
II, or the successors of such companies, should--
            (1) reimburse those former prisoners, or their survivors, 
        for the labor performed for the commercial interests of such 
        companies; and
            (2) compensate those former prisoners, or their survivors, 
        for whatever brutality the companies inflicted on the prisoners 
        during the period of forced labor.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                         | By      Design, Inc.         |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Date:      March 8,      2010 | By:                          | /s/ Deanie      J. Underwood |
|                          | Deanie      J. Underwood     |
|                          | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                          | Chief      Financial Officer |
No. P68/69.

protest 67/15439 (New York).

#### L. Thaler & Co. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of certain padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 244

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol

for a ceremony as part of the commemoration ofthe days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 244

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on May 4, 2000, for a ceremony as part of

4 the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims

5 of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony
2

•HCON 244 EH

1 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as

2 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives January 31,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 62384.

#### Carson M. Simon & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 225002-K (Philadelphia).

*383*Opinion by*

Mollison, J.

*In*accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of marble slabs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *General Shipping & Trading Co. et. al.*(44 C. C. P. A. 168, C. A. D. 656), the claim of plaintiff was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 379

Reaffirming the first amendment right to freely exercise religious beliefs

without the fear of governmental condemnation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 2000

Mr. GRAHAM submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Reaffirming the first amendment right to freely exercise religious beliefs without the fear of governmental condemnation.

Whereas the first amendment states that ‘‘Congress shall

make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or

prohibiting the free exercise thereof ’’;

Whereas the practice and expression of religious beliefs without congressional interference are a cherished freedom in

our constitutional democracy;

Whereas it is imperative in our constitutional democracy that

all major political parties unite in defending and protecting the first amendment religious rights of all Americans;
2

HCON 379 IH

Whereas action taken by Congress to condemn any constitutionally protected religious practice or belief will have a

chilling effect and stifle the religious freedoms that

Americans enjoy;

Whereas the political act of congressional condemnation of religious beliefs or practices would seriously undermine the

spirit of the first amendment;

Whereas hundreds of thousands of Americans have fought

and died around the world under the banner of the

United States to defend the right of all Americans to

practice their religious beliefs free from governmental

condemnation; and

Whereas the first amendment’s function is to protect the religious freedoms of those Americans who may find themselves in the minority regarding religious practices and

beliefs: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) as an institution, reaffirms the rights of

4 United States citizens to hold religious beliefs and

5 engage in constitutionally protected religious prac6 tices free from congressional condemnation;

7 (2) affirms that the right to religious diversity

8 in our country is one of the fundamental precepts of

9 the Constitution;

10 (3) should pass no resolution condemning the

11 right of any group or individual to express his or her

12 religious beliefs, popular or unpopular, as protected
3

HCON 379 IH

1 by the first amendment, even when those practices

2 and beliefs are deemed to be offensive to individual

3 Members of Congress;

4 (4) recognizes the constitutionally protected

5 right of religious groups to practice their religion

6 without fear of reprisal from Congress, even when

7 individual Members of Congress may be offended by

8 such beliefs or practices;

9 (5) recognizes that, more than 200 years after

10 adoption of the Constitution, Congress reaffirms

11 that the wisdom of the first amendment’s protection

12 of religious freedom rings as true today as when the

13 words were first penned; and

14 (6) should never be tempted as a body politic

15 to condemn religious views, because to do so would

16 lead to serious erosion of religious freedom.

Æ
(Reap. Dec. 10847)

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3683, etc.

(Decided November 10, 1964)

*Sharp é Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> • 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. §162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC.
                        INCENTIVE PLAN FOR KEY EXECUTIVES


         In accordance with paragraph 10 of the First Hawaiian, Inc. Incentive
Plan for Key Executives (hereinafter the "Plan"), Section 3.b of the Plan is
hereby amended by adding a new sentence at the end thereof to read in its
entirety as follows:

         In calculating the Consolidated Income Before Income Taxes and
         Securities Gains of the Group, the Committee, in consultation with the
         Chief Executive Officer and/or the Chief Financial Officer, may make
         such adjustments to the reported amount as the Committee may deem
         appropriate in the circumstances.

The amendments set forth herein shall be effective as of the date BancWest
Corporation, a California corporation, is merged with and into First Hawaiian,
Inc., a Delaware corporation.

         TO RECORD the adoption of these amendments, First Hawaiian, Inc. has
executed this document this 15th day of October, 1998.

                                         FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC.



                                         By  /s/  Herbert E. Wolff
                                           -----------------------------
                                         Its  Senior Vice President
                                                  and Secretary