alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Jason
Reid, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jody Frank, Chief Financial
Officer, certify. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Jason Reid
                
                /s/
      Jody E. FrankJason
      Reid
                
                Jody
      E. FrankPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                
                Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      March 18, 2009
                
                Date:
      March 18, 2009
A90A0026.

#### DELJOU v. SHARP BOYLSTON MANAGEMENT COMPANY.

(391 SE2d 27)

Birdsong, Judge.

This appeal concerns an order denying attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 (a) to the prevailing party on an abusive litigation claim on which the judgment was $750.

Sharp Boylston Management Company (Sharp Boylston) filed a dispossessory action against Mehrdad Deljou (Deljou). Deljou answered denying the allegations of the dispossessory and counterclaimed against Sharp Boylston for abusive litigation.

Sharp Boylston dismissed the dispossessory, and subsequently a jury awarded Deljou $750. Although Deljou’s motion for attorney fees was pending, the trial court entered judgment for Deljou, but did not make the findings necessary under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) for a final judgment. Later, the trial court denied the motion for attorney fees because it found subsection (a) of OCGA § 9-15-14 inapplicable since it decided the dispossessory action was justified when filed and subsection (b) inapplicable since it determined attorney fees were not appropriate under the facts.

We granted Deljou’s application for authority to appeal the denial of his motion for attorney fees under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10) and he contends that his motion for attorney fees was erroneously denied because award of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 (a) is *506mandatory when one prevails on an abusive litigation claim. *Held:*

Decided February 13, 1990.

*Calabro, Vogel & Jennette, Michael M. Calabro,*for appellant.

*Germano, Kimmey & Cheatwood, J. Steven Cheatwood,*for appellee.

Deljou’s contention that jury verdicts awarding damages on abuse litigation claims under *Yost v. Torok,*256 Ga. 92 (344 SE2d 414), require trial courts to award attorney fees and expenses of litigation under OCGA § 9-15-14 (a) is without merit. Although this section requires the award of attorney fees and litigation expenses *(Haggard v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. System,*257 Ga. 524, 526 (360 SE2d 566)) upon a proper determination (OCGA § 9-15-14), the section does not mandate an award whenever a party prevails on an abusive litigation claim. OCGA § 9-15-14 (f) vests the trial court, without jury, with responsibility for determining whether an award should be made. *Ferguson v. City of Doraville,*186 Ga. App. 430, 433 (367 SE2d 551), overruled on other grounds, *Vogtle v. Coleman,*259 Ga. 115, 119, fn. 8 (376 SE2d 861). Thus, the jury verdict awarding damages on Deljou’s abusive litigation claim, even reduced to judgment, did not mandate the award of attorney fees. *Bouchard v. Fowler,*193 Ga. App. 697 (388 SE2d 874) (1989). Accordingly, the trial court did not err by refusing to award attorney fees merely because Deljou prevailed on the abusive litigation claim.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Cooper, J., concur.*
May 19, 2015

James Rogalski

105 Parkview Crescent Chapel Hill, NY 27516

Dear Mr. James Rogalski:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 24 th , 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0728), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# C_2022027EN.01001401.xml

| 19.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 December 2021

appointing the President of the Community Plant Variety Office

(2022/C 27/05)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights (1), and in particular Article 43(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision of 16 June 2016 (2), the Council renewed the term of office of Mr Martin EKVAD as President of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ’Office’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision of 16 June 2016 (2), the Council renewed the term of office of Mr Martin EKVAD as President of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ’Office’).

| (2) | The renewed term of office of Mr Martin EKVAD expired on 31 August 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The renewed term of office of Mr Martin EKVAD expired on 31 August 2021.

| (3) | On 22 September 2021, after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office, the Commission proposed to the Council a list of candidates for the President of the Office, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 22 September 2021, after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office, the Commission proposed to the Council a list of candidates for the President of the Office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   Mr Francesco MATTINA is hereby appointed as President of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ’Office’) for a period of five years.

2.   The term of office of Mr Francesco MATTINA shall run from the date on which he takes up his duties. That date shall be agreed between him and the Administrative Council of the Office.

Article 2

The Chairperson of the Administrative Council of the Office shall be empowered to provide for all the arrangements necessary to implement Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. VIZJAK

---

(1)  OJ L 227, 1.9.1994, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 16 June 2016 renewing the term of office of the President of the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ C 223, 21.6.2016, p. 6).

2

---
No. P67/411.

#### The Nissho American Corp. *v.*United States, protest 66/29179 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise covered by tbe foregoing protest consists of pistol grips solely or chiefly used with specific model motion picture cameras and following tbe principles in *J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 143, C.D. 2744), tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Kyleen E. Cane, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Legal Access Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that:
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Legal Access Technologies, Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
 within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
 issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: March 15, 2004   /s/ Kyleen Cane
 Kyleen E. Cane
 President, Chief Executive and
 Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
  1
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 9, 2012

h0502 

# Order

May 9, 2012

144165

RANDY H. BERNSTEIN, D.P.M., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144165 COA: 299184 Oakland CC: 2008-096538-NM SEYBURN, KAHN, GINN, BESS & SERLIN, P.C. and BARRY R. BESS, Defendant-Appellees,

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
No. 62891.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 289568-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of enlargers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52089.

protests 94469-K, etc. (Los Angeles, etc.).

#### Eastern Grocery Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

   CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   REQUIRED BY SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of SWMX, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Date: March 29, 2007

                                         /s/ James Caci
                                         --------------------------------
                                         James Caci
                                         Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to SWMX, Inc. and will be retained by SWMX, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Before the Second Division,

February 28, 1968

No. P68/90.

protests 65/4023, etc. (New York).

#### The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of trays (boats) similar in all material respect to those the subject of *The Rembar Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 239, C.D. 2774), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 288

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the importance of families and children

in the United States and expressing support forthe goals and ideas of National FamilyDay.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 288

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the importance of families and children in the

United States and expressing support for the goals and

ideas of National FamilyDay.

Whereas national evidence indicates that America’s kids are

faced with oppressive issues such as violence, drugs,

abuse, and even family stress, causing the future of the
2

•HCON 288 EH

children of the United States, and therefore the future of

the Nation, to be at risk;

Whereas families in the United States, regardless of their

economic status, ethnic or cultural heritage, or geographic location, are experiencing the pressures caused by

contemporary society while trying to raise and nurture

emotionally healthy and physically safe children;

Whereas Americans realize the challenges of spending quality

family time together amidst today’s busy lifestyles and

balancing work schedules and kids’ activities to regularly

share a family meal;

Whereas it is imperative that the people of the United States

act willfully and purposely to secure a positive future for

the Nation by devoting time to family bonding, sharing

traditions, and communicating values to children in an

effort to sustain the importance of family;

Whereas KidsPeace, one of the Nation’s oldest, most comprehensive not-for-profit organizations dedicated to helping children attain the confidence and courage needed to

face and overcome crises, has established National

FamilyDay to focus unified attention on nurturing family

relationships and improving family communications

thereby helping to build strong families which give kids

peace;

Whereas National FamilyDay will be celebrated annually on

a Sunday in March; and

Whereas National FamilyDay will provide opportunities for

families to reclaim the family mealtime which fosters

trust and builds better communication, and will encourage parents, grandparents, and caregivers to recognize
3

•HCON 288 EH

the importance of being involved in the physical and emotional lives of their children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the importance of children and

4 families to the future of the United States;

5 (2) expresses support for the goals and ideas of

6 National FamilyDay as established by KidsPeace;

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States

8 to participate in local and national activities hon9 oring National FamilyDay; and

10 (4) believes that families who communicate and

11 spend time together create stronger families which

12 give kids peace.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
CA 21- 9

 May 27, 2021

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all 

institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, including those with total consolidated 

assets of $10 billion or less.

SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF CRA CONSIDERATION FOR COMMUNITY 

DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN 

ISLANDS IN RESPONSE TO HURRICANE MARIA 

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 

(OCC) are issuing the attached statement to extend the period for Community 

Reinvestment Act (CRA) consideration of community development activities that help to 

revitalize or stabilize Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands related to Hurricane Maria. 

These islands were originally designated as major disaster areas due to Hurricane Maria 

on September 20, 2017,1 and the agencies are granting a 36-month extension to the 

original period provided in the January 2018 Interagency Statement on CRA 

Consideration for Community Development Activities in the U.S. Virgin Islands and 

Puerto Rico Following Hurricane Maria.

2

The statement also explains that a financial institution with assessment area(s)

located outside of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands will continue to receive 

consideration for community development activities that revitalize or stabilize the areas

affected, as long as the institution has been responsive to the community development 

needs and opportunities of its assessment area(s). 

1 Puerto Rico Hurricane Maria (DR 4339) and U.S. Virgin Islands Hurricane Maria (DR 4340), 

respectively.

2 Board CA 18-1; FDIC FIL-7-2018; OCC News Release 2018-6.
2

If supervised financial institutions have questions about the guidance set forth in this 

letter, they are encouraged to contact the responsible Federal Reserve Bank. In addition, 

questions may be sent via the Board’s public website.3

Sincerely, 

Attachment: 

• Interagency Statement: Agencies Extend Period for Favorable CRA Consideration 

Given to Community Development Activities Responding to Hurricane Maria 

Disaster in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands

Cross Reference:

• CA 18-1 CRA Consideration for Community Development Activities in the U.S. 

Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico Following Hurricane Maria

• CA 16-5 Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Community 

Reinvestment

3 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,647-02

EX PARTE NASARIO VASQUEZ, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1464140-B IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 208 District Court of Harris County, and that the habeas application was forwarded to this TH

Court without Relator ever receiving a copy of any filed answers, motions, and findings of fact and

conclusions of law.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response as to whether copies of all pleadings, affidavits, and orders filed

relating to Relator's habeas applications were mailed or delivered to Relator, and if not, why not. 
2

If such documents have not been mailed or delivered to Relator, the clerk shall forward any

documents described in Rule 73.4(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to Relator

immediately. If such documents have been mailed or delivered to Relator, the clerk shall submit

proof of the date upon which such documents were mailed or delivered. This application for leave

to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: March 11, 2020

Do not publish