alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2021457EN.01000401.xml

| 21.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 457/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 457/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/2270

of 14 December 2021

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Lički škripavac’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Lički škripavac’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Lički škripavac’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lički škripavac’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lički škripavac’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Lički škripavac’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3 – Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 December 2021.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 325, 13.8.2021, p. 22.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    236,816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           4,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         30,379
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           522
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,236
<SALES>                                         97,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,566
<CGS>                                           88,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (75,454)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

March 23, 1961

No. 65318.

#### Hercules Division, American Machine & Foundry Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/26761 (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Arnoldo Vara Torres v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00300-CR

Trial court case number: 1317308

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Arnolda Vara Torres, has filed a “Motion for Extension of Time Within 

Which to file the Appellant’s Brief.” We deny the motion.

Torres’s brief was originally due on July 12, 2013. On July 25, 2013, the Clerk of 

this Court notified Torres that his brief was late and required a response within 10 days. 

Torres responded on August 8, 2013, by filing a motion for extension of time to file his 

brief. We granted the motion and required Torres to file his brief by September 6, 2013. 

On September 25, 2013, Torres filed another motion for extension of time to file his 

brief, arguing that more time was necessary “[d]ue to [his counsel’s] work load.” We 

granted the motion, required Torres to file his brief by October 25, 2013, and informed 

him that no additional motions to extend time would be granted. Nevertheless, Torres 

filed a third motion for extension of time to file his brief on December 12, 2013, once 

again contending that an extension is necessary “[d]ue to [his counsel’s] work load.”

Given the procedural history of this case and in light of our previous order stating 

that no further extensions would be granted, we DENY Torres’s motion for extension of 

time. See Sandoval v. State, No. 07-11-0136-CR, 2011 WL 6059804, at *1 n.2 (Tex. 

App.—Amarillo Dec. 6, 2011, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (“This Court does 

not consider a busy work schedule as good cause for granting a subsequent motion to 

extend the time to file a brief.”); Newfield v. State, 766 S.W.2d 408, 407–09 (Tex. 

App.—Dallas 1989), pet. dism’d, improvidently granted, 817 S.W.2d 63 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991) (denying motion for extension of time to file brief when party requested 

extension based on counsel’s workload); Hubbard v. State, 649 S.W.2d 167, 169 (Tex. 

App.—Dallas 1983, no writ) (same).

Unless this Court receives Torres’s brief within ten (10) days of the date of this 

order, we will abate the case and order the trial court to conduct a hearing pursuant to 
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). We suspend the 

application of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.2—the mailbox rule—to this deadline 

to file Torres’s brief, and no extensions of time will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 

9.2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting individually 

Date: January 23, 2014
December 26, 1946

No. 51496.

Suit 4526.

#### Washington *Handle Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 936 affirmed November 4, 1946. C. A. D. 346.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMarching iterative methods for the parabolized and thin layer Navier-Stokes equationsDownstream marching iterative schemes for the solution of the Parabolized or Thin Layer (PNS or TL) Navier-Stokes equations are described. Modifications of the primitive equation global relaxation sweep procedure result in efficient second-order marching schemes. These schemes take full account of the reduced order of the approximate equations as they behave like the SLOR for a single elliptic equation. The improved smoothing properties permit the introduction of Multi-Grid acceleration. The proposed algorithm is essentially Reynolds number independent and therefore can be applied to the solution of the subsonic Euler equations. The convergence rates are similar to those obtained by the Multi-Grid solution of a single elliptic equation; the storage is also comparable as only the pressure has to be stored on all levels. Extensions to three-dimensional and compressible subsonic flows are discussed. Numerical results are presented.Document ID19860009180Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsIsraeli, M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1985Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:178028NASA-CR-178028ICASE-85-60Accession Number86N18650Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-83-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17070Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860009180.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------




                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-28CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-28CB


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
```

                                                                 Exhibit 31

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Derfelt, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-K,  and all reports on
       Form 8-K  containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in
       respect  of periods  included  in the year  covered  by this  annual
       report of Navistar Financial 2005-A Owner Trust;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  the information in these reports,  taken as a
       whole,  does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or
       omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements
       made,  in light of the  circumstances  under  which such  statements
       were made,  not  misleading as of the last day of the period covered
       by this annual report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or servicing  information
       required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  Servicer  under the
       pooling and servicing agreement,  for inclusion in these reports, is
       included in these reports;

4.    Based  on my  knowledge  and  upon the  annual  compliance  statement
       included in the report and  required to be  delivered to the trustee
       in   accordance   with  the  terms  of  the  pooling  and  servicing
       agreement,  and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has
       fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.    The reports disclose all instances of material non-compliance relating
       to the Servicer's  compliance with  the  minimum  servicing standards
       based upon  the report provided by an  independent public accountant,
       after conducting  a  review in  compliance  with the  Uniform  Single
       Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
       forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is included in these
       reports.

6.    In giving  the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on
       information  provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:
       Owner Trustee.

 Date: January 26, 2009        By:/s/DAVID L. DERFELT
                                     David L. Derfelt
                                     V.P., and Controller
                                    (Principal Accounting Officer)
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tarique Simmons, Also Known as Tarique Washington, Also Known as Joseph Thomas, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 49]

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered March 29, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, under Indictment No. 12322/92, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) two amended judgments of the same court, both also rendered March 29, 1993, revoking sentences of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated conditions thereof, after a hearing, and imposing sentences of imprisonment upon his previous convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. *63010397/92, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 10779/92.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer did not oppose the People’s motion to close the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover police officer is without merit. The defendant himself agreed not to oppose closure because he had no one to attend the trial with him. The trial court asked the defendant if he understood the right he was waiving; the defendant said he did. Furthermore, the trial court conducted a brief hearing pursuant to *People v Hinton*(31 NY2d 71) and the elements necessary to support closure were established at the hearing *(see, People v Martinez,*82 NY2d 436). Accordingly, the trial counsel’s failure to oppose closure did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Garcia,*75 NY2d 973).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
No. 66628.

#### Alltransport, Inc., and Chuna Banner et al. *v.*United States,

protests 208678-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) As to the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under said paragraph 1547 (a) ; and (b) as to items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after May 28, 1950, at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).
No. 59862.

#### Paul A. Straub & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 186075-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66618.

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/9566 and 61/12564 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vitrified decorated bowls similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 50327, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gustavo Dominguez

, * From the 39th District

Court of Haskell County,

Trial Court No. 6433

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00 152

- CR * April 18, 2013

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Willson, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in

the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the

trial court is in all thin gs affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AgFeed Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John A. Stadler, Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  March 16, 2011
By:
/s/ John A. StadlerJohn A. StadlerInterim Chief Executive Officer and President
  This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered January 1 3 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00361 - CR MONTEZ ANTONIO ASHBY , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 292 nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 20 - 75720 - V

O RDER We REINSTATE this appeal
. By order issued November 30, 2022, the Court abated th e appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing and making findings and
reco mmendati ons regarding why appellant ’ s overdu e brief had not been filed. On Dec ember 12, 2022 2 , appellant tendered a brief for filing and later filed a December 13, 2022 motion to extend the time to file his brief.– 2

–

On January 10, 202 3, a supplemental c ler k ’ s record was filed containing the trial court ’ s December 13, 2022 findings and recommendation s . The Court ADOPTS the trial court ’ s findings that : (1) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel ; (2) appellant desires to prosecu t e the a ppeal and has not aban doned the ap peal; and (3) appointed co unsel ’ s explanation for the delay in filing appellant ’ s brief is that he mis

- calendared the deadline
. The trial court recommended that the Court accept and file appellant ’ s brief. W e agree with th e trial court ’ s recommendation . We GRANT appellant ’ s motion to extend the time to file his brief and ORDER appellant’s tendered brief filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
No. 60621.

#### General Materials Co. and Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 256320-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum rods similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mohawk Iron & Steel Co.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 274, C. D. 1533), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Seaspan
Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I, Gerry Wang, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Dated: March 23, 2012
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Gerry Wang                    
|                      |  | Gerry Wang Chief Executive
Officer