alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I , William Y. Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Act), that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 19, 2008 |  | /s/ William Y. Tauscher
|                         |  | William Y. Tauscher    
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
No. 59354.

protest 249459-K (New York).

#### United States Raw Skins Tanners, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)
(Reap. Dec. 10876)

#### British Cars & Parts, Inc. Robert L. Landweer & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 295, etc.

*480(Decided January 6, 1965)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for tire plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for tbe plaintiffs herein and subject to approval of the Court as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed JDM (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner J.D. MacFarlane (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> 2. That the merchandise herein consists of automobiles exported from Canada similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *John V. Carr & Sons*v. *United States,*R.D. 10442, wherein the Court held that the cost of production under Section 402(f), Tariff Act 1930, of automobiles manufactured in England, sold and shipped to a Canadian distributor, and then resold to a Canadian retailer who subsequently shipped the automobiles to an importer in the United States, excluded Canadian sales tax, Canadian excise tax, and the Canadian distributors mark-up.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation from Canada of the automobiles involved herein such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the ordinary course of trade in the principal markets of the country of exportation either for *home*consumption or for exportation to the United States.

> 4. That on or about such date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the ordinary course of trade for domestic consumption in the principal markets of the United States.

> 5. That the invoice unit values of the automobiles herein represent the Canadian sales price including a six percent markup of the Canadian distributor and that no Canadian excise tax or sales tax is included in the invoice unit prices.

> 6. That the cost of production of the automobiles herein as defined in Section 402(f) Tariff Act 1930, is equal to the invoice unit values marked in green ink less 5.661 percent.

> 7. That the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, may be submitted on this stipulation; same being limited to the merchandise and issues described herein and above and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find and bold cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoiced unit values marked in green ink, less 5.661 per centum.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 52425.

protests 983866-G, etc. (New York).

#### H. H. Schmidt Glove Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*170Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
Before the Third Division,

June 14, 1965

No. 69374.

#### Shirokiya, Incorporated, and American Customs Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protest 63/17443 (Honolulu).

Donlon, Judge:

We have today filed our decision in *Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States,*54 Cust. Ct. 277, C.D. 2544 (protests 63-17439 and 63/19357) in which the tariff classification of a Japanese food product, called Ramen, was at issue. This case likewise involves Ramen that was imported from Japan, but under a different brand name.

The material difference in the products appears to be that the Ramen of this suit does not contain eggs or egg products, as did the Ramen of the *Fujii Junichi Shoten*case. Claim, therefore, is under a different provision of paragraph 725, likewise as modified by the Annecy Protocol (T.D. 52373) to the Terms of Accession of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade:

> Macaroni, vermicelli, noodles, and similar alimentary pastes:

> Containing no eggs or egg *products_l<“e*per lb.

As in *Fujii Junichi Shoten, supra,*defendant concedes that the Ramen here, known by the trade name Toyoko Ramen (exhibit 1), is an alimentary paste. Defendant has stipulated that Toyoko Ramen does not contain eggs or egg products.

*464It is not necessary for us to discuss in detail the record now before us, or to repeat here our discussion of the law. Slight differences in the ingredients in the two products do not affect decision as to the basic issue of tariff similarity to the *eo nomine*alimentary pastes of paragraph 725. If anything, on the record here, there are shown to be *even*fewer ingredients in Toyoko Ramen which are unlike the usual ingredients of macaroni, vermicelli, and noodles. Exclusion of eggs and egg products is provided for in the tariff schedule. Such exclusion affects rate which is 1 cent per pound for the eggless alimentary pastes that are otherwise *similar*to macaroni, vermicelli, and noodles.

On the record before us, and for reasons more fully set forth in *Fujii Junichi Shoten, supra,*the protest claim is sustained as to duty at 1 cent per pound on the merchandise described in the entry as Toyoko Ramen.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of
Majestic Oil & Gas Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Patrick
Montalban





Patrick
Montalban


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer




March 30,
2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Majestic Oil & Gas,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>   1



                                  EXHIBIT 12(A)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                26 WEEKS
                                                  ENDED                                 YEAR ENDED
                                                 12/25/99
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)                     (UNAUDITED)         1999          1998       1997       1996        1995
                                               -----------         ----          ----       ----       ----        ----
<S>                                            <C>             <C>            <C>         <C>          <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges
     Interest and amortization
      of debt issuance costs on
      all indebtedness                         $14,874         $15,864        $7,336      $4,967       $3,934     $3,057


     Add interest element
      implicit in rentals                          989           1,158           521         394          222        211
                                               -------          ------         -----       -----         ----       ----


     Total fixed charges                       $15,863         $17,022        $7,857      $5,361       $4,156     $3,268
                                               =======          ======         =====       =====        =====      =====

Income
     Income before income
      taxes                                    $98,935         $53,863       $32,168       $6,400      $1,146       $671


     Add fixed charges                          15,863          17,022         7,857        5,361       4,156      3,268
                                                ------          ------         -----        -----       -----      -----

     Income before fixed
      charges and income taxes                 $114,798        $70,885       $40,043      $11,761      $5,302     $3,939
                                               ========        =======       =======      =======      ======     ======

Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges                                    7.24            4.16          5.10         2.19        1.28       1.21

</TABLE>
No. 62913.

#### Beer Stern Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 276212-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Get the Facts 

[Man #1] Right here in the United States . . . 

[Woman #1] . . . every nine-and-a-half minutes . . . 

[Man #2] . . . someone's father . . . 

[Woman #2] . . . someone's mother . . . 

[Man #3] . . . someone's brother . . . 

[Woman #3] . . . someone's sister . . . 

[Man #4] . . . someone's friend . . . 

[Woman #4] . . . someone's co-worker . . . 

[Man #5] . . . someone's neighbor . . . 

[Woman #5] . . . is infected with HIV. 

[Man #6] Get the facts. 

[Announcer] Get the facts. Visit nineandahalfminutes dot org. Act Against AIDS.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Donald W. Hultgren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /S/ Donald W. Hultgren 
|                       |  | Donald W. Hultgren     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Maria Teresa NEVAREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74120.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*613Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Maria Teresa Nevarez, Garden Grove, CA, pro se.

District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stephen R. Campbell, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

*The*panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Teresa Nevarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen removal proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *see INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992), and we review due process claims de novo, *see Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

To the extent Nevarez challenges the BIA’s decision dismissing her appeal from the IJ’s denial of cancellation of removal and the BIA’s decision denying her motion to reconsider the dismissal, we lack jurisdiction because Nevarez did not file petitions for review within thirty days of those decisions. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied as untimely Nevarez’s motion to reopen. The BIA affirmed the IJ’s order of removal on November 10, 2003, and did not receive Nevarez’s motion to reopen until more than ninety days later on April 30, 2004. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Accordingly, the BIA’s denial of Nevarez’ motion to reopen was not arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law. *See Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Before the Second Division,

November 28, 1967

No. P67/421.

#### World Wide Automobiles Corp. *v.*United States, protest 61/4139 (New York).

Eao, C:J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of spark plugs in chief value of metal, not dedicated to use in any vehicle, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lodge Spark Plug Co.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 158, C.D. 2379), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
··1-f/11'···

In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: April25,2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASIDNGTON, DC

Docket No. FAA-2016-4261 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2013S0700189 Respondent


### ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING On April22, 2016 (11 :48 a.m.), an OrderDeeming the FAA's Response to the Respondent's Motion for Extension Untimely and Moot and ReservingOtherReliefwas filed. A courtesy copy was also faxed to the parties. Laterthat same day, on April22, 2016 (2:17p.m.), the FAA filed a Notice ofWithdrawal ofComplaint. 1 Afterhaving reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. All pending motions and other requests for reliefare deemed moot. 2
..Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List Judge J U.S. Ad

1The FAA's Complaint identifies the Respondent as "United Parcel Service Co." In its Notice ofWithdrawal of Complaint, the FAA erroneously identifies the Respondent as "UnitedParcel Service, Inc." Althoughthe FAA made an inferred request for a change ofparty identity in its April 8, 2016 Response to Respondent's Motion for Extension ofTime, such request has been reserved. (April22, 2016 Order, 4**~** 2.) Thus, the identity ofthe Respondent in this proceeding continues to be the respondent identity originally plead: "United Parcel Service Co."

### DocketNo. FAA-2016-4261 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 · Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 · Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10002



### Mr. James H. Dunfee Jr. Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Enforcement Division, SouthernTeam 1701 ColumbiaAve College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAJ(: 404-305-5223 

### Mr. Paul Alp Respondent's Counsel CROWELL & 

### MORING LLP 1001 PennsylvaniaAvenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 TEL: 202-624-2500 FAJ(: 202-628-5116

· Judge J.E. Sullivan

U.S. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAJ(: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY 

### Mr. Winston E. Miller Respondent's Counsel Frost, Brown, Todd, LLC 400 Market Street, 32nd Floor Louisville, KY 40202-3363 TEL: 502-589-0296 FAJ(: 502-581-1087
Ms. Meaghan G. Byrd Respondent's Counsel Alston & 

### Byrd LLP One Atlantic Center 1201 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309-3424 TEL: 404-881-7245 FPC(: 404-253-8510

2 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

               Consent of Surovell, Jackson, Colten & Dugan, P.C.
                             (included in Exhibit 5)

                                       12
No. 59876.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 280232-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmaceutical  Resources,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Dennis J. O'Connor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
           the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations
           of the Company.



/s/ DENNIS J. O'CONNOR
----------------------
Dennis J. O'Connor
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003

                                      -35-
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22609]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12218]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Bellini and Giorgione: In 
the House of Taddeo Contarini'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Bellini and Giorgione: In the 
House of Taddeo Contarini'' at The Frick Collection, New York, New 
York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-22609 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
December 28, 1950

No. 55054.

Suit 4641.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States.

C. D. 1205. (Appeal dismissed September 29, 1950.)