alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Par  Pharmaceutical  Companies,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Dennis J. O'Connor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Dennis J. O'Connor
----------------------
Dennis J. O'Connor
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
No. 53322.

protests 138467-K, etc. (New York).

#### Miller Harness Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The pretests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72744-72745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas and Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR24-4-000.
    Applicants: The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company.
    Description: Sec.  284.123(g) Rate Filing: Petition for Rate 
Approval to be effective 11/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 10/16/23.
    Accession Number: 20231016-5092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/6/23.
    Protest Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/15/23.
    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission

[[Page 72745]]

processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such 
as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cd829d9d8daba8bfaee3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f504f4f5f797a6d7c31787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 16, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-23294 Filed 10-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

I, Robert Angrisano, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nevada Star Resource Corp. certify that:

 
| 1. | This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nevada Star Resource Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Star Resource Corp. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  July 10, 2006

 
|   | /s/ Robert Angrisano |        |
|--------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|

Robert Angrisano, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Randall D. Stilley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hercules Offshore, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 8, 2006                  
|                                     
|/s/ RANDALL D. STILLEY               
|Randall D. Stilley                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 62366.

#### A. M. Ross-Smith et al. *v.*United States,

protests 159838-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of petroleum distillate in gelatin containers and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *A. M. Ross-Smith*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 354, C. D. 2005), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             540
<SECURITIES>                                     4,603
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,216
<PP&E>                                           7,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,646
<BONDS>                                            653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,705
<OTHER-SE>                                    (53,438)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,566
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
### AD Economic Evaluation



### Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 0861 Directorate ID: 2010
- SW
- 092
- AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model A109A and A109AII Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 63 Helicopters in the US Regi stry. Reason : This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive for the specified Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) helicopters with a certain tail rotor special hub plug installed. This action requires a one -time inspection and depending on the inspection results , replacing certain parts or disassembling the tail rotor hub and blades assembly and inspecting for damage. 

### Costs : Action Number of Work Hours X Labor Rate Labor

Cost Parts Cost Cost per

Aircraft Affected

fleet size Fleet Cost Determine the tightening torque value of the hub plug (one
time inspection) 0.25 hrs X labor rate of $85 $21 0 $21 63 $1,323 Replace lock washer and O
-ring 2.0 hrs X labor rate of $85 $170 $287 $457 56 (assume 89% of fleet) $25,592 Replace hub plug 2.0 hrs X labor rate of $ 85 $170 $850 $1020 1 (assume 1% of the fleet $1020 Replace Trunnion, Hub Plug, Spacers, Static Stop 5.0 hrs. X labor rate of $85 $425 $8,884 $9,309 7 (assume 10% of fleet) $65,163 Total cost impact for this AD $93,098


### Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
Before the Second Division,

February 21, 1968

No. P68/84.

protest 65/2513 (Boston).

#### Raymond H. Hamson *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles, with *1004or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: October 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 16, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 29 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-12 and CP2024-12.

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,
Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-23440 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case No. 10,317.

#### The NORTH CAROLINA.

[Blatchf. Pr. Cas. 645.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

July 17, 1863.2

Phizb — Enemy Property.

Decree of the district court, condemning vessel and cargo as enemy property, affirmed.

[Cited in The Amy Warwick, Case No. 341.]

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Southern district of New York.

[The ship North Carolina was captured by the libelants, and was adjudged by the district court to be lawful prize of war, and was ■ordered to be condemned, with costs of the suit. Case No. 10,316a. From that decree the owners of the North Carolina appeal.]

1

 [Reported by Samuel Blatchford, Esq.] a [Affirming Case No. 10,316a.]

2

 [Affirming Case No. 10,316a.]

NELSON. Circuit Justice.

This vessel was captured off Cape Henry, on the 14th of May, 1861. by the steamer Quaker City. Her owners were citizens and residents of the state of Virginia at the time. She has been condemned as enemy property. Decree below affirmed. [Case No. 10,31Ga.]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11.1


             Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

Income per share calculation:

($000 omitted, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                               September 30,                   September 30,                       
                                          1996             1995             1996          1995
                                          ----             ----             ----          ---- 
<S>                                   <C>             <C>             <C>             <C> 
Net (loss)                            $       (527)   $       (563)   $     (1,807)   $     (1,257)
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Weighted average number of
  common shares and common
  share equivalents are as follows:

Weighted average common
   shares outstanding                   10,313,529       8,960,942      10,313,529       8,329,155
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------ 

Shares held in escrow                     (150,000)       (150,000)       (150,000)       (150,000)

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding as adjusted        10,463,529       8,810,942      10,463,529       8,179,155
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------ 

Net (loss) per common and
  common equivalent share             $      (0.05)   $      (0.06)   $      (0.17)   $      (0.15)
                                      ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------ 
</TABLE>

Note: Shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the
number of incremental shares which result from applying the "treasury stock
method" for options and warrants, APB 15, paragraph 38.

                                      12
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40331 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL ANTHONY MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JANIE COCKRELL; STANLEY MELVIN, Ad-Seg Major; KELLEE LANGLEY; KEVIN LANGLEY; RODNEY COOPER; BRIAN RODEEN; ROD WILSON; JOE SKIPPER; ALLEN POLUNSKY; JIM SHAW; JOHN CARRUTHERS; JOE EASLEY; NORRIS JORDAN; WILLIAM GADDIS; JEFFREY CABE; ROBERT BROCK; REGINAL STANLEY; CHRIS BEARD; JEFFREY LANN; JAMES BURGESS; WILLIAM JONES; MICHAEL HORN; JUDY MCCOLLUM; TIM RANGE; JAMES POOLE; JOAN RAYBURN; LOAN HOPKINS; JAMES BURNS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CV-50

-------------------- August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Michael Anthony Moore, Texas prisoner number 487939, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous. Moore argues that the district court erred inNo. 01-40331 -2- dismissing his § 1983 suit, and he contends that the district court should have granted him leave to amend his complaint. However, Moore does not explain how the district court erred in dismissing his complaint without first granting him leave to amend it. Moore thus has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his suit and declining to grant him leave to amend his complaint. See Pittman v. Moore , 980 F.2d 994, 994 (5th Cir. 1993); Ashe v. Corley , 992 F.2d 540, 542 (5th Cir. 1993). Moore’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because this appeal lacks merit, it is DISMISSED, and Moore’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2. The dismissal of Moore’s complaint as frivolous and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a “strike” for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We note that Moore has one other strike against him. See Moore v. Collins , No. 94-20490 (5th Cir., Jan. 26, 1995). By accumulating three strikes, Moore is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis in any subsequent civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR INVOKED.
March 27, 1959

No. 62903.

#### Esso Standard Oil Co. *v.*United States,

protest 194881-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 280

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special

Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run to be runthrough the Capitol Grounds.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 280

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 280 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL

2 OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

3 THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

4 On June 2, 2000, or on such other date as the Speak5 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

6 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des7 ignate, the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics

8 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred

9 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

10 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

11 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum12 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co13 lumbia.

14 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

15 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

16 may be necessary to carry out the event.

17 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA18 TIONS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

20 for physical preparations for the event.

21 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

22 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce23 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

24 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con25 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations
3

•HCON 280 EH

1 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli2 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2000.

Attest:

Clerk.