alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 122 Agreed to November 19, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the Mounted Guard was assigned to the Immigration

Service under the Department of Commerce and Labor from

1904 to 1924;

Whereas the founding members of this Mounted Guard included

Texas Rangers, sheriffs, and deputized cowboys who patrolled

the Texas frontier looking for smugglers, rustlers, and people

illegally entering the United States;

Whereas following the Department of Labor Appropriation Act of

May 28, 1924, the Border Patrol was established within the

Bureau of Immigration, with an initial force of 450 Patrol Inspectors, a yearly budget of $1 million, and $1,300 yearly pay for

each Patrol Inspector, with each patrolman furnishing his own

horse;

Whereas changes regarding illegal immigration and increases of

contraband alcohol traffic brought about the need for this young

patrol force to have formal training in border enforcement;

Whereas during the Border Patrol’s 75-year history, Border Patrol

Agents have been deputized as United States Marshals on

numerous occasions;

Whereas the Border Patrol’s highly trained and motivated personnel

have also assisted in controlling civil disturbances, performing

National security details, aided in foreign training and assessments, and responded with security and humanitarian assistance

in the aftermath of numerous natural disasters;

Whereas the present force of over 8,000 agents, located in 146

stations under 21 sectors, is responsible for protecting more than

8,000 miles of international land and water boundaries;

Whereas, with the increase in drug-smuggling operations, the

Border Patrol has also been assigned additional interdiction

duties, and is the primary agency responsible for drug interdiction

between ports-of-entry;

Whereas Border Patrol agents have a dual role of protecting the

borders and enforcing immigration laws in a fair and humane

manner; and

Whereas the Border Patrol has a historic mission of firm commitment to the enforcement of immigration laws, but also one fraught

with danger, as illustrated by the fact that 86 agents and pilots

have lost their lives in the line of duty—6 in 1998 alone: Now,

therefore, be it
H. Con. Res. 122—2

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress recognizes the historical significance of the

United States Border Patrol’s founding and its 75 years of service

to our great Nation.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
### SERVED : FEBRUAR Y 24 , 201 2 

### m i rtD2 M P3^0^ ^

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T OFTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARrNG S WASHINGTON , D C
I NTHEMATTERO F 

## SK Y KING , INC
. F A A DOCKE T No
. CP I i SOOOO U (Civi l Penalt

y Case ) DMSFAA-20 1 1-067

0
ORDE R SANCTIONIN G RESPONDEN T Th e Orde rt o Sho wCaus e ("OSC") , serve d Januar y24 , 2012 , directe d Responden t Sk yKing , Inc
. ("Respondent" ) 1 ) t o answe rb yFebruar y10 , 201 2 th e Firs t Request s fo rDiscover y("Discovery" ) proffere d b y Complainan t Federa l Avjatio n Administration.("Complainant" ) an d 2 ) t o sho w caus e b yFebruar y10 , 201 2 wh yth e relie f requeste d i n Complainant' s Motio n t o Compe l - whic h prompte d th e OS C - shoul d no t b e granted
. Complainant' s Discovery , Complainan t ha d averred , ha d bee n sen t o n Novembe r1 , 2011 ; Respondent' s answer s initiall yha d bee n du e o n Decembe r1 , bu t Complainan t extende d th e deadlin e t o Januar y5 , 2012
. Complainan t file d th e Motio n t o Compe l becaus e Responden t ha d faile d t o respon d t o th e Discovery
. Th e OSC , orderin g paragrap h 3 , als o warne d Responden t tha t sanction s coul d Issu e shoul d i t fil e anythin g les s tha n "ful l an d complete " response s t o Complainant' s Discover yi n a timel ymanner , e.g , b yFebruar y 10
. Responden t ha s faile d t o respon d a t all
.Sanction s agains t Responden t wil l no wissue
. Responden t Sk yKing ,

Inc
. wil l b e foreclose d a t th e hearin g fro m offerin g o rrelyin g upo n an y documents , o ran yinformatio n containe d i n them , o ran ywitnesses , regardin g whic h i t faile d t o notic e i n respons e t o Complainant' s Firs t Request s fo rDiscovery
. S O ORDERED
.

:c1iarti-crGoodwi n Administrativ e I^a

w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

### FDMSNo
. FAA-20 ] 1-067 0 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y StephenA
. Badger , V PFligh t Operation s an

dDirecto r o f Safet y andSecurity Sk y King , Inc
. 360 0 Power

In nRoad , Suite H Sacramento , C A 9582 6 TEL : 916-454-240 0 FAX : 916-737-896 0 Geral dA
. Ellis , Complainan t \ s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regional Counse l Souther nRegion , ASO- 7 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n P.O
. Box 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e RichardC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La

w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega

l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6 Fa

x

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i nperso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e tli e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdnunislration

, 80 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigli l Building—Suit

e 2WIO00 , Washington
. D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Decke l Clerk , AGC-430
.
<PAGE>

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Michael  A.  Cane,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Legal  Access Technologies, Inc. for the quarterly
period  ended  October 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects  the  financial  condition  and  results  of operations of Legal Access
Technologies,  Inc.


                                       By:     /s/ Michael A. Cane
                                               ---------------------------------
                                       Name:   Michael A. Cane
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer
                                       Date:   December 13, 2002



I,  Steven  D.  Fellows, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Legal  Access Technologies, Inc. for the quarterly
period  ended  October 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects  the  financial  condition  and  results  of operations of Legal Access
Technologies,  Inc.


                                       By:     /s/ Steven D. Fellows
                                               ---------------------------------
                                       Name:   Steven D. Fellows
                                       Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                       Date:   December 13, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2019 s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2019

158380(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158380

COA: 343584

Wayne CC: 88-002156-FC

CHARLES CAUSEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 4, 

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
EXHIBIT 99.2

Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Timothy P. Dimond, the Chief Financial Officer of Technology Solutions Company, certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Technology Solutions Company.

|Date: August 9, 2002 | By: |  | /s/TIMOTHY P. DIMONDTimothy P. Dimond
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

27

---

QuickLinks
Before the Second Division,

December 28, 1945

No. 50780.

#### Protests 995183-G, etc., of H. A. Stern Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The Government conceded in its brief that the hemmed cotton squares are chiefly used as head coverings and not as mufflers, but contended that the evidence failed to prove that the unhemmed cotton squares are chiefly used as head coverings and not as muffler's. The exhibits introduced in evidence measure about 29 by 29 inches square, are all of very bright colors with a complete design printed on each of them, some being hemmed on two sides, or edges, and some unhemmed. They all have a selvage on two sides, showing that the articles were originally woven in the piece and then cut into, separate squares between the designs. The court was of the opinion that the testimony clearly showed that the hemmed and unhemmed squares were used chiefly, if not exclusively, by women as head pieces or coverings, and were so used since they became in vogue in this country in 1936. The claim under paragraph 919 was therefore sustained.
MARTIN SCHMOLDT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5610

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 24, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

Martin Schmoldt, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brittany Rhodaback, Assistant Attorney 

General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
-                      -                        -                          -  Risk Management 
                        - Hazard Mitigation Planning
                        -  Hazard Mitigation Planning 
                        -  Mitigation Best Practices 
                        -  Create a Hazard Mitigation Plan 
                        -  Hazard Mitigation Plan Status 
                        -  Mitigation Planning and Grants 
                        -  Regulations and Guidance 
                        -  Implement Mitigation Planning Activities 
                        -  Tribal Mitigation Planning Policy Updates 
                        -  Climate Resilience 
                        -  Building Science 
                        -  Earthquake Risk 
                        -  Dam Safety 
                        -  Hurricane, Wind & Water Surge Hazards 
                        -  Hazardous Response Capabilities 

# Mitigation Best Practices

                            - English 

Mitigation Best Practices are stories, articles or case studies about individuals, businesses or communities that undertook successful efforts to reduce or eliminate disaster risks.

They demonstrate that disaster preparedness decreases repetitive losses, financial hardship and loss of life.

FEMA seeks to inspire and educate citizens to consider mitigation options by highlighting proven practices implemented by others in their homes and communities. It is our hope that visitors to this library find relatable and informative techniques to reduce their risk and eliminate hazards.

Explore mitigation planning examples on the Mitigation Planning Success Stories story map. It highlights success stories on plan implementation, plan integration, outreach, engagement and equity. If you have a success story worth sharing, please email us.

## Search for Mitigation Best Practices

Iberia Parish Communications Center: Maximizing Mitigation through Collaboration

Voluntary Regional Planning Approach Builds Stronger Partnerships

FEMA Mitigation Grant Helps Fortify Critical Facility in Lee County, Florida

Environmentalist Takes Steps Towards Actualizing a More Resilient, Sustainable Community in Punta Gorda, Florida

Cape Coral, Florida Wind Retrofit Provides Security for Facility Over 30-Years Old

Fort Myers Hospital Restoration Project Performs Well During Storm

Elevating Higher to Alleviate Flood Woes in Louisiana Parish

Mitigation Methods Reduce Risks for Mexico Beach, Florida Residents

Montgomery County, Texas Post-Storm Home Replacements Stand the Tests of Time and Weather Hazards

The Fight to Keep His Home – Mitigation Action in the Real World – Lafitte, Louisiana

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast » 

Last updated February 13, 2024

Return to top
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22002]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Designation of performance review board standing register.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the Performance Review Board Standing 
Register for the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all 
previously published lists of PRB members.

DATES: This appointment is effective as of September 29, 2023.

Bell, Melody C.
Bishop, Tracey A.
Budney, Michael D.
deBeauclair, Geoffrey G.
Dehaven, Darrel S.
Hine, Scott E.
Hoffman, Patricia A.
Kremer, Kevin P.
Lally, Brian J.
Lee, Terri T.
Miller, Michael P.
Montoya, Michael M.
Mullis, John A.
Nelson-Jean, Nicole
Passarelli, Derek G.
Richards, Jocelyn E.
Schultz, Douglas W.
Susut, Ceren
Turnure, James T.

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on September 
29, 2023, by Henry Greene, Director of the Executive Programs Division, 
Office of Corporate Executive Management, Office of the Chief Human 
Capital Officer, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of 
Energy. That document with the original signature and date is 
maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance 
with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the 
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to 
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication as an 
official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative 
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on September 29, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2023-22002 Filed 10-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 60611.

#### Louis Greenberg & Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 289127-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60247, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1991-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,214
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,226
<PP&E>                                         1,596,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,321,439)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,193
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,648
<SALES>                                        26,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,988
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  39,296<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Opinion filed December 31 , 2015



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ _ ___ _ ____ 

### No s . 11

- 1 5

- 00 3 0 3

- C R & 11

- 15

- 00304

- CR

____ __ ______ 

### AMBER DAWN RUSSELL , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 118 th District Court Howard County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 14568 & 14569

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant, Amber Dawn Russell , entered into a plea agreement with the
State and pleaded guilty to two offense s of delivery of a controlled substance

. In each case, t he trial court assessed Appellant’s punishment in accordance with the
terms of her plea agreement at confinement for two years in a state jail facility, to run concurrently

. Appellant filed a pro se not ice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal s

.2

T his court notified A ppellant by letter s dated November 24, 2015 , that we
had received information from the t rial c ourt that Appellant waived h er right of appeal in each case and that th ese are plea

- bargain case s in which Appellant has no right of appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d)

. We requested that A ppellant respond and show grounds to continue the appeal s

. Appellant has not filed a

response

. Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that, in a plea bargain case in which the punishment does not exceed the punishment agreed to in the plea bargain, “a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appe al.” The
documents on file in e ach of these appeals reflect that Appellant entered into a plea bargain , that h er punishment wa s assessed in accordance with the plea bargain , that Appellant waive d her right to appeal , and that the trial court denied Appell ant’s request for permission to appeal

. T he trial court’s certification s w ere signed by Appellant, Appellant ’s counsel , and the judge of the trial court. The trial court
certified in each case that A ppellant has no right of appeal

. T he documents on file
in this court sup port the trial court’s certification s and show that Appellant waived
h er right of appeal in both cases

. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. Accordingly , we must dismiss t h ese appeal s without furt her action.
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 6 75, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, t h e s e appeal s are di smissed

. PER CURIAM December 31, 2015 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J.
No. 60293.

protests 187798-K, etc. (New York).

#### Paul A. Straub & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

, Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A 15, C. A. D. 458), *398the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).