alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 68553.

protests 61/20615, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Victor England Agencies, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*351Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hanging- paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Victor England Agencies, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2394), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                          41,132
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,861,965
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             78,458
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        2,100,498
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             35,201
<PP&E>                                           9,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,132,949
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<PAYABLES>                                   2,950,698
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          2,075,249
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               4,243
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,132,949
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                3,138
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            34,378
<COMMISSIONS>                                   13,887
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    4,376
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    6,707
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,308
<COMPENSATION>                                  20,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,785
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,785
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

May 3, 1956

No. 59883.

#### Decorative Crafts, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 282851-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-23-050]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

October 26, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         none.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 731-TA-921 (Fourth Review) (Folding Gift Boxes from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on November 3, 2023.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         none.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 19, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-23419 Filed 10-19-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Donald W. Hultgren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 7, 2007 |  | /S/ Donald W. Hultgren 
|                       |  | Donald W. Hultgren     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
1st Am to Standard Form of Agmt



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR 
  
 This First Amendment to Standard Form of Agreement between Owner and Contractor is dated as of September 18, 2003, and is by and between PNK (Lake Charles), L.L.C. as “Owner,” and Manhattan Construction
Company as “Contractor,” with regard to the following: 
  
 A. Owner and Contractor have previously entered into that certain Standard Form of Agreement between Owner and Contractor, with addenda, relating to the construction of a casino resort in Lake Charles, LA (the “Construction
Agreement”). 
  
 B. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Construction Contract. 
  
 For good and valuable consideration, Owner and Contractor hereby amend the Construction Agreement as follows: 
  
 1. Section 4.3 of the Construction Agreement is hereby amended to provide that Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work within
eighteen (18) months from the date of commencement of the Work, which date of commencement was September 12, 2003. 
  
 2. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall
become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the other party, it being understood that both parties need not sign the same counterpart. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission,
such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile signature page were an original thereof. 
  
 3. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Construction Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor to be 







 executed as of the date first set forth above. 
  

	 OWNER
	 	 	 	 
			
	 PNK (LAKE CHARLES), L.L.C
 A Louisiana limited liability company
	 	 	 	 
					
	By:	 	 Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
 Its Sole Member
and Manager
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
					
	By:	 	 /s/    CLIFFORD D. KORTMAN

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	Clifford D. Kortman	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 Senior Vice President
 Construction/Development
	 	 	 	 	 	 
				
	CONTRACTOR	 	 	 	 	 	 
				
	 Manhattan Construction Company
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 /s/    LEONARD REJCEK

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	Leonard Rejcek	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	President Southwest Region	 	 	 	 	 	 

  
 . 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

 -2-
From: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US 

To: "Achanta, Chandana L." <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: Robin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Maureen Delaney/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathryn 

Sargeant/AA/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 03/26/2010 01:21 PM 

Subject

: 

OMB request on preamble and RIA table formats and word changes regarding fuel savings 

Chandana - 

I just want to clarify our phone discussion. 

Regarding the reformatting of tables with respect to the programs costs and benefits, OMB is 

requesting that only one table in the entire EPA package be altered - Table 7 of the Executive 

Summary of the RIA. No changes in the preamble and no changes in the rest of the RIA need to 

be made. 

For Table 7 - which I show below, you would like the two rows I highlighted in red to be moved to 

be directly beneath the row labled "Fuel Savingss" 

With respect to word edits, for both the EPA sections of the preamble and in the EPA RIA, OMB 

would like EPA not to refer to fuel savings as a "negative cost", but simply as a "fuel savings". 

For example, in the following sentences from the RIA, OMB's request could be met by deleting 

the middle sentence: 

"Note that the quantified annual costs shown in Table 1 are negative because fuel savings 

are included. Fuel savings are considered as negative costs (i.e., positive benefits) of the 

vehicle program. The fuel savings outweigh the costs associated with the addition of new 

technology and, therefore, the vehicle program costs are negative." 

Can you please respond to this email ASAP and let me know if I have captured the request 

correctly. 

Thanks 

Bill 
2020 2030 2040 2050 NPV, 3%a 

Vehicle Costsb $15,600 $15,800 $17,400 $19,000 $345,900 

Fuel Savings -$35,700 -$79,800 -$119,300 -$171,200 -$1,545,600 

Benefits from Reduced CO2 Emissions at each assumed SCC valuec,d,e 

Avg SCC at 5% $900 $2,700 $4,600 $7,200 $34,500 

Avg SCC at 3% $3,700 $8,900 $14,000 $21,000 $176,700 

Avg SCC at 2.5% $5,800 $14,000 $21,000 $30,000 $299,600 

95th percentile SCC at 3% $11,000 $27,000 $43,000 $62,000 $538,500 

Other Impacts 

Criteria Pollutant 

Benefitsf,g,h,i B $1,200-$1,300 

$1,200-

$1,300 

$1,200-

$1,300 $21,000 

Energy Security Impacts 

(price shock) $2,200 $4,500 $6,000 $7,600 $81,900 

Reduced Refueling $2,400 $4,800 $6,300 $8,000 $87,900 

Value of Increased Drivingj $4,200 $8,800 $13,000 $18,400 $171,500 

Accidents, Noise, 

Congestion -$2,300 -$4,600 -$6,100 -$7,800 -$84,800 

Quantified Net Benefits at each assumed SCC valuec,d,e 

Avg SCC at 5% $27,500 $81,500 $127,000 $186,900 $1,511,700 

Avg SCC at 3% $30,300 $87,700 $136,400 $200,700 $1,653,900 

Avg SCC at 2.5% $32,400 $92,800 $143,400 $209,700 $1,776,800 

95th percentile SCC at 3% $37,600 $105,800 $165,400 $241,700 $2,015,700 a
No. 54461.

#### Nicholas Pollak *v.*United States,

protest 156796-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the Second Division,

November 1, 1956

No. 60317.

protests 591898-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise at bar is of the same class or kind as that involved in the cases of *Brin Bros. & Senegram,*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 11701 and Abstract 58204. *405The witness for the plaintiff testified that the rags were of a kind chiefly used for papermaking. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62897.

#### Indussa Corp. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 305310-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grinding wheels the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Swiss Manufactures Association, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 227, C.D. 1933), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10.4
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
RETENTION PLAN AND SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION
  ARTICLE 1  DEFINITIONS
 Affiliate.
 Board.
 Cause.
       1




---



##### 



Company.
 Change of Control.
         2




---



##### 



Disability.
 Good Reason.
 Participant. Schedule 1 Schedule 1
 3




---



##### 



ARTICLE 2
CHANGE OF CONTROL BENEFIT
 Employment Term and Capacity after Change of Control.
  Compensation and Benefits.
 Base Salary.
 Annual Bonus.
 4




---



##### 



1 2
 Fringe Benefits.
 Expenses.
 Incentive, Savings and Retirement Plans.
 Welfare Benefit Plans.
 5




---



##### 



Vacation.
 Obligations upon Termination after a Change of Control
 Termination by Company for Reasons other than Death, Disability or Cause or by
Participant for Good Reason.
    6




---



##### 



Death.
 Disability.
 Cause.
 Voluntary Termination.
 Accrued Obligations and Other Benefits.
 Stock Options and Restricted Stock.
 Legal Fees.
 Set-Off; Mitigation.
 7




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3
MISCELLANEOUS
 Successors.
  Funding.
 Plan Amendment or Termination.
 Applicable Laws.
 Administration of the Plan.
 Companys Reservation of Rights.
 8




---



##### 



Schedule 1 Schedule 1
 Type of Plan.
 Section 409A
 ARTICLE 4
CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS
 Claims Procedure.
 Claim Denial and Appeal.
 ARTICLE 5
ERISA RIGHTS
  Receive information about Plan and benefits.
 9




---



##### 



Obtain copies of all Plan documents and other plan information upon written request to the
Plan Administrator.
 Prudent actions by Plan fiduciaries.
 Enforce rights.
  Assistance with questions.
 10




---



##### 



WITNESSES:
    
    
    
    STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.By:Name:
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:Title:Name:
 11
No. 57518.

#### Hugo Neu Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 175688-K and 175689-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of lead scrap of which metal is the component material of chief value and that it is secondhand and fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
# Official Journal L 186/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.186.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 186 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5415 July 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.186.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 186

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5415 July 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/406/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 1 July 2011 amending the SIRENE Manual
  (notified under document C(2011) 4574) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2011/406/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 1 July 2011 amending the SIRENE Manual
  (notified under document C(2011) 4574)

(notified under document C(2011) 4574)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William M. Lutz, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Salton, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Salton, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ William M. Lutz
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            William M. Lutz
                                            Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Salton, Inc. and will be retained by Salton, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-                      -                        -                          -  Tools 
                        - Benefit-Cost Analysis
                        -  Benefit-Cost Analysis 
                        -  Resources 
                        -  How to Complete a Streamlined BCA 
                        -  How to Perform a Full BCA 
                        -  News & Notes 
                        -  Training Materials 
                        -  Authorized Equipment List 
                        -  Environmental & Historic Preservation Guidance 
                        -  FEMA Grants Outcomes (FEMA GO) 
                        -  Grants Management Technical Assistance 
                        -  Non-Disaster Grants Management System 

# Resources to Support Benefit-Cost Analysis

                            - English 

FEMA has developed resources for applicants and subapplicants to use while navigating the cost-effectiveness requirement for hazard mitigation projects.

## Search for Documents and Downloads

Search by title or use the filters below to find BCA Toolkit resources, existing Pre-Calculated Benefits, ecosystem services and general reference guides, as well as training materials for instructors and students.

                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 1 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 2 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 3 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 4 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 5 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 6 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 7 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 8 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

Basic Concepts in Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Unit 9 - Instructor Guide
                              -  Oct 15, 2021 
                              - Download File

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

Last updated June 3, 2022

Return to top
No. 53358.

protests 913986-G, etc. (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
No. 58801.

protests 231325-K, etc. (New York).

#### Chinese Arts & Products, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of *300brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

June 14, 1965

No. 69370.

#### Polks Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 64/2353(D), 64/2358(B), and 64/2342(B) (New York).

Opinon by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.