alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LEON POWELL, a.k.a. RASHID ALI,

Defendant Below, Appellant,

v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. §

§ No. 48, 2020 § § § § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 82007195DI (N) § § § §

Submitted: March 17, 2020 Decided: March 19, 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA , and MONTGOMERY-REEVES , Justices.

ORDER Upon consideration of the notice to show cause and the parties’ responses, it appears to the Court that: (1) On February 7, 2020, the appellant, Leon Powell, a.k.a. Rashid Ali, filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court order, dated January 13, 2020, denying his motion for transcripts. The Clerk issued a notice directing Powell to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed based upon this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal in a criminal matter. In his response to the notice to show cause, Powell asserts that he has a right to review the penalty phase of his trial.2

(2) In this case, the Court asked the State to clarify the nature of the proceedings currently pending before the Superior Court in Powell’s case. The State has responded and notes that Powell’s request for transcripts appears to have been made because Powell was contemplating filing a Rule 35(a) motion for correction of an illegal sentence. Although a Rule 35(a) motion is not currently pending before the Superior Court, the docket reflects that Powell has filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for postconviction relief in the Superior Court, both of which remain pending. (3) Under the Delaware Constitution only a final judgment may be reviewed by the Court in a criminal case. 1 “An order constitutes a final judgment where it leaves nothing for future determination or consideration.” 2 The Superior Court’s January 13, 2020 order denying Powell’s motion for transcripts is an interlocutory order. 3 To the extent that Powell seeks transcripts in connection with his pending motion for postconviction relief, his pending motion to dismiss, or a future filing of a Rule 35(a) motion, if Powell is unsuccessful on the merits of any such motion, he may then appeal to this Court for a review of that final judgment as well as any interlocutory ruling relating to the denial of a request for transcript at

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b). 2 Robinson v. State , 704 A.2d 269, 271 (Del. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 3 Hall v. State , 2018 WL 3993440, at *1 (Del. Aug. 17, 2018).3 State expense. 4 At this point in time, however, the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider Powell’s interlocutory appeal. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice

4 Christopher v. State , 2009 WL 2841191, at *1 (Del. Sept. 4, 2009).
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos.
033-71376, 333-42099, 333-50032 and 333-54020 on Form S-8 and No. 33-72210 on
Form S-3 of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. of our report dated July 20, 2001,
relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Chester Valley
Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period end4ed June 30, 2001, which report appears in the June 30, 2001 Form 10-K
of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc.



/s/KPMG LLP
----------------------------
KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 17, 2001
No. 53364.

protests 97748-K, etc. (New York).

#### Popper Morson Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal C 207/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 207 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6218 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 207

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6218 June 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 207/01 | Council Conclusions — ‘Synergies between Eurojust and the networks established by the Council in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters’ | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 207/02 | Euro exchange rates | 8 |
| 2019/C 207/03 | Interim update of the weightings applicable to the remuneration of officials, temporary staff and contract staff of the European Union serving in third countries | 9 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2019/C 207/04 | Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (
  1
  ) | 12 |
| 2019/C 207/05 | Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations | 12 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2019/C 207/01

Council Conclusions — ‘Synergies between Eurojust and the networks established by the Council in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters’

1

European Commission

2019/C 207/02

Euro exchange rates

8

2019/C 207/03

Interim update of the weightings applicable to the remuneration of officials, temporary staff and contract staff of the European Union serving in third countries

9

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2019/C 207/04

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (
  1
  )

1

12

2019/C 207/05

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
(Reap. Dec. 11109)

#### Saft Corp. of America *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 701170; 703146; 701171.

(Decided December 7, 1965)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement, enumerated in schedule A, attached to and made a part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain storage batteries, imported from France.

The following stipulation of fact has been entered into by the parties—

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto:

> 1. that the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after the effective date of .the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165) and is not identified on the Ein'al List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) ; that appraisement was accordingly made under Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act;

> 2. that on or about the dates of exportation, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation and in the usual wholesale quantities, and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice unit value, less ocean freight and marine insurance as invoiced, plus 10%, net packed;

> 3. that the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A” annexed may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described herein'above and abandoned in all other respects.

Upon the agreed facts of record, the court finds and holds that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of *7061930, as amended by tlie Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the storage batteries in issue and that said value is the invoice unit value, less ocean freight and marine insurance, as invoiced, plus 10 percent, net packed. Insofar as said appeals for a reappraisement pertain to other merchandise and issues, said appeals, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 223

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding

Freedom Day.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 223

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall was torn

down by those whom it had imprisoned;

Whereas the fall of the Berlin Wall has become the preeminent symbol of the end of the Cold War;

Whereas the Cold War, at its essence, was a struggle for

human freedom;
2

•HCON 223 EH

Whereas the end of the Cold War was brought about in large

measure by the dedication, sacrifice, and discipline of

Americans and many other peoples around the world

united in their opposition to Soviet Communism;

Whereas freedom’s victory in the Cold War against Soviet

Communism is the crowning achievement of the free

world’s long 20th century struggle against totalitarianism; and

Whereas it is highly appropriate to remind Americans, particularly those in their formal educational years, that

America paid the price and bore the burden to ensure the

survival of liberty on this planet: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a Freedom Day should be celebrated each

4 year in the United States; and

5 (2) the United States should join with other na6 tions, specifically including those which liberated

7 themselves to help end the Cold War, to establish a

8 global holiday called Freedom Day.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
# L_2013211EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
# Official Journal C 325A/14 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 325A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6114 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 325A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6114 September 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2018/C 325 A/01 | Corrigendum to notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/361/18 — Irish-language (GA) translators (AD 5) ( OJ C 244 A, 12.7.2018 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2018/C 325 A/01

Corrigendum to notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/361/18 — Irish-language (GA) translators (AD 5) ( OJ C 244 A, 12.7.2018 )

( OJ C 244 A, 12.7.2018 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 53349.

protests 143090-K, etc. (New York).

#### Schenley Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim Of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of SWS Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 24, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James H. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 3, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/ James H. Ross                    
|                       |  |  |  | James H. Ross Chief
Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.



62
ARTISOFT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             EXHIBIT 11. COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                             September  30,
                                                        -----------------------
                                                           1998          1997
                                                           ----          ----

Net income (loss)                                       $    (332)      $   238
                                                        =========       =======

 Basic EPS-Weighted average common shares outstanding      14,660        14,555
                                                        =========       =======

 Basic net income (loss) per share                      $    (.02)      $   .02
                                                        =========       =======

 Basic EPS-Weighted average shares outstanding             14,660        14,555

 Effect of diluted securities:
    Stock options                                              --(1)         26
                                                        =========       =======

 Diluted EPS-Weighted average shares outstanding           14,660        14,581
                                                        =========       =======

 Stock options not included in diluted EPS since
 anti-dilutive                                                  4            --
                                                        =========       =======

 Diluted net income (loss) per share                    $    (.02)      $   .02
                                                        =========       =======

----------
Notes:

(1)  Common  share  equivalents  are  anti-dilutive  for the three  months ended
September 30, 1998, therefore,  basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is
the same.
No. 66643.

#### Balfour Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/16615, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2023045EN.01003701.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/37

---

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — KPMG Advisory v Commission

(Case T-614/21) (1)

(2023/C 45/62)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 481, 29.11.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Corporate
Express Inc. consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          33,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  528,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,169
<INVENTORY>                                    158,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               764,715
<PP&E>                                         319,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,689,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          441,142
<BONDS>                                        545,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     644,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,689,045
<SALES>                                      2,106,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,106,429
<CGS>                                        1,582,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  451,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,666
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,107
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of America Service Group
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 14, 2003


                                        Name:   /s/ Michael Catalano
                                                -----------------------------
                                        Title:  Chairman, President &
                                                Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to America Service Group
Inc. and will be retained by America Service Group Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                                         8,908,100
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,985,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                   791,300
<INVENTORY>                                    17,585,354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               38,826,057
<PP&E>                                         651,995,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (238,541,532)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 491,309,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          39,257,058
<BONDS>                                        307,306,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,577,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   491,309,033
<SALES>                                        71,732,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               71,732,217
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  53,655,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,080,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,321,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,321,696
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,321,696
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
No. 52406.

protests 116485-K, etc. (El Paso, etc.).

#### Cooper’s Indian & Mexican Store et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.