alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 12



               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         13 WEEKS
                                           ENDED                                 YEAR ENDED
                                         9/30/00
(THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)              (UNAUDITED)        2000          1999            1998           1997          1996
                                        -----------        ----          ----            ----           ----          ----
<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Fixed Charges
     Interest and amortization
      of debt issuance costs on
      all indebtedness                   $  9,887       $ 31,102       $ 15,864       $  7,336       $  4,967       $  3,934


     Add interest element
      implicit in rentals                     885          1,923          1,158            521            394            222
                                         --------       --------       --------       --------       --------       --------



     Total fixed charges                 $ 10,772       $ 33,025       $ 17,022       $  7,857       $  5,361       $  4,156
                                         ========       ========       ========       ========       ========       ========

Income
     Income before income
      taxes                              $ 34,404       $146,903       $ 53,863       $ 32,186       $  6,400       $  1,146
     Add fixed charges                     10,772         33,025         17,022          7,857          5,361          4,156
                                         --------       --------       --------       --------       --------       --------

     Income before fixed
      charges and income taxes           $ 45,176       $179,928       $ 70,885       $ 40,043       $ 11,761       $  5,302
                                         ========       ========       ========       ========       ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges                               4.19           5.45           4.16           5.10           2.19          1.28
</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

February 26, 1953

No. 57089.

protest 195162-K (New York).

#### Paramount Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pear-shaped glass articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Brier Manufacturing Co.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 68, C. A. D. 465), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Trung Tri Doan, certify that:

 

1.                          I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SemiLEDs Corporation (the “Registrant”);

 

2.                          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
| Dated:   December 30, 2013 | /s/ Trung Tri   Doan                        |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                            | Name: Trung Tri   Doan                      |
|                            | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 57814.

protest 150243-K (Portland, Me.).

#### Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

*389Opinion by

La whence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Burnoil heaters and draft controls similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Davies Turner & Company*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 294, C. D. 1425), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2019338EN.01000101.xml

| 8.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 October 2019

(2019/C 338/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0993 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4679 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8910 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0924 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0388 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,781 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 333,64 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3317 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7475 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6316 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4633 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6237 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7452 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5175 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 315,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6332 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8582 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4235 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 579,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6094 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,024 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,3155 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,476 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4709 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5000 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,0435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0993

JPY

Japanese yen

117,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4679

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89155

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8910

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0924

ISK

Iceland króna

136,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0388

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,781

HUF

Hungarian forint

333,64

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3317

RON

Romanian leu

4,7475

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6316

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4633

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6237

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7452

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5175

KRW

South Korean won

1 315,20

ZAR

South African rand

16,6332

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8582

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4235

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 579,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6094

PHP

Philippine peso

57,024

RUB

Russian rouble

71,3155

THB

Thai baht

33,476

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4709

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5000

INR

Indian rupee

78,0435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 2003 V

UNPUBLISHED

DIANE D ’ AMICO

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: June 8, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA , for petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On December 30, 2019

, Diane D ’ Amico filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRV A ” ) as a result of a flu vaccine administ ered on September 28, 2018

. Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 8, 2021

, a ruling on entitlement was issued , finding P etitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On June 8, 2021

, R espondent filed a p roffer on a ward of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating P etitioner should be awarded $ 77,756.70

. Proffer at

4

. In the Proffer, R espondent represented that P etitioner agrees with the proffered award.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2

Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that P etitioner is entitled to an award as stated

in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, I award P etitioner a lump sum payment of $ 77,756.7 0 (representing $ 75,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,756.70 for unreimbursed vaccin e

- injury

- related expenses ) in the form of a check
payable to P etitioner

. This amount represents compensation for all damages that w ould be available under § 15 (a)

.

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint fil ing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
EXHIBIT 4.3

                   Amendment No. 2 to W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd.
                       2001 Employee Equity Incentive Plan

      WHEREAS, on July 24, 2001, the Board of Directors of W.P. Stewart & Co.,
Ltd., a Bermuda company (the "Company"), adopted the Company's 2001 Employee
Equity Incentive Plan, and on January 25, 2002, the Board of Directors of the
Company adopted Amendment No. 1 thereto (as so amended, the "Plan");

      WHEREAS, the Company considers it desirable and in its best interests to
make additional shares available for awards under the Plan; and

      WHEREAS, the Company considers it desirable to provide for longer periods
during which vested options may be exercised;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

      1. Section 4(a) is amended by substituting "3,000,000" for "2,500,000" in
the first sentence thereof and in the fifth sentence thereof.

      2. Section 6(a)(iii) is amended by substituting the first sentence thereof
in its entirety with "In the case of Options granted prior to May 12, 2003, the
vested portion of each Option shall be exercisable only during the 365-day
period commencing on and including the vesting date, and, in the case of Options
granted on or after May 12, 2003, the vested portion of each Option shall be
exercisable only during the period commencing on and including the vesting date
and ending on the day immediately prior to the second anniversary of such
vesting date (in each case, such period being hereinafter referred to as the
'Exercise Period')."

      3. Section 2(b) of Exhibit B is amended by deleting "of 365 days" and by
adding "and ending on the day immediately prior to the [first][second]
anniversary of such Vesting Date" before "(the 'Exercise Period')" in the first
sentence thereof.

      The date of this Amendment is May 12, 2003.
June 28, 1951

No. 55741.

Suit 4662.

#### United States *v.*Magnus, Mabee & Reynard, Inc.

C. D. 1260 affirmed May 8, 1951. C. A. D. 455.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald W. Hultgren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 9, 2005 |  | /S/ Donald W. Hultgren 
|                       |  | Donald W. Hultgren     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
89–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–23

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO

SUSPEND THE RULES

MARCH 20, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 92]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 92, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that the following measures may be considered under suspension of the rules at any time on the legislative

day of Wednesday, March 21, 2001, or Thursday, March 22, 2001:

(1) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 43) authorizing

the printing of a revised and updated version of the House document entitled ‘‘Black Americans in Congress, 1870–1989’’;

(2) The bill (H.R. 1042) to prevent the elimination of certain

reports;

(3) The bill (H.R. 1098) to improve the recording and discharging of maritime liens and expand the American Merchant

Marine Memorial Wall of Honor, and for other purposes;

(4) The bill (H.R. 1099) to make changes in laws governing

Coast Guard personnel, increase marine safety, renew certain

groups that advise the Coast Guard on safety issues, make

miscellaneous improvements to Coast Guard operations and

policies, and for other purposes;

(5) The bill (H.R. 496) to amend the Communications Act of

1934 to promote deployment of advanced services and foster

the development of competition for the benefit of consumers in

all regions of the Nation by relieving unnecessary burdens on

the Nation’s two percent local exchange telecommunications

carriers, and for other purposes;

2

(6) The bill (H.R. 802) to authorize the Public Safety Officer

Medal of Valor, and for other purposes.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Theodore R. Schroeder, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. [Intentionally omitted];     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.             /s/ Theodore R. Schroeder   Theodore R. Schroeder   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
No. 67234.

protests 60/7297, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Morris Friedman et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fiber tree corsages similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63552, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
GARDERE 

attorneys and counselors • www.gardere.com 

Anacarolina Estaba 

Dire(...'t Dial: 713-276-5398 

Direct Fax: 713-276-6398 

Email: aestaba@gardere. com 

VIA REGULAR MAIL and EMAIL 

james.archier@faa.gov 

James Archier, Agency Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Southwest Region 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Fort Worth, Texas 76137 

April29, 2013 

RECE\\IED ""~ '{ ~ \ ltl\3 

HEARING DOCK'SI 

Re: FAA Case No. 2011-EA-700202; Radio Holland USA, Inc. 

Dear Mr. Archier: 

This letter is in response to FAA correspondence dated April 15, 20 13. 

Accordingly, Radio Holland requests a hearing in this matter pursuant to 14 CFR § 13.16h 

of the Federal Aviation Regulations. 

In addition, Radio Holland requests to take the deposition of Special Agent Louis 

Fernandez. 

Anacarolina Estaba 

AE/pprn 

cc: Federal Aviation Administration VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

GardereOl- 6313261v.l 

GARDERE WYNNE SEWEll UP 

1000 Louisiana, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002·5011 • 713.276.5500 Phone • 713.276.5555 Fax 

Austin • Dallas • Houston • Mexico City
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


18
U.S. C. Section 1350


as
adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Cogdell Spencer Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”), filed concurrently herewith by the
Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:   March
      16, 2010
            By:
            /s/Frank C.
      SpencerName:  Frank
      C. SpencerTitle:   
      Chief Executive Officer





The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Cogdell Spencer Inc (the “Company”),
hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the “Form 10-K”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:   March
      16, 2010
            By:
            /s/Charles M.
      Handy            _Name: 
      Charles M. HandyTitle:   
      Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-47551, dated March 21,
2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the
Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.