alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. R67/52.

No. R67/53.

No. R67/54.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R60/13815 (Houston).

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R62/14019 (Miami).

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R64/18552 and R64/18553 (Port Everglades).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Oom-*
      *913pany, *Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f.o.b. charges of $11 per metric ton.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10426

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GENESIS JARAMILLO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-196-2

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Genesis Jaramillo

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jaramillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10426 Document: 00514865715 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2019
No. 18-10426

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-10426 Document: 00514865715 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2019
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 44

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24, 1999

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 18th

annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 44 RDS

1 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL

2 PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

3 The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxil4 iary shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the eight5 eenth annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service,

6 on the Capitol Grounds on May 15, 1999, or on such other

7 date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and

8 the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate

9 may jointly designate, in order to honor the more than

10 160 law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty

11 during 1998.

12 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized by section

14 1 shall be free of admission charge to the public and ar15 ranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under

16 conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol

17 and the Capitol Police Board.

18 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The National

19 Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall assume

20 full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident

21 to all activities associated with the event.

22 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

23 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the

24 approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the National Fra25 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary are authorized to

26 erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplifi-
3

HCON 44 RDS

1 cation devices, and other related structures and equip2 ment, as may be required for the event authorized by sec3 tion 1.

4 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

5 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce6 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

7 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con8 cerning sales, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol

9 Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the

10 Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event authorized by

11 section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives March 23,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         $   449,015
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,654,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,297,820
<PP&E>                                          10,951,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,587,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,621,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,818,290
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         44,800
<COMMON>                                            64,460
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,128,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,621,288
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,105,631
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,966,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (24,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23,931
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (48,342)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0

        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Wilderness and Wild and ScenicRivers Program ... in review**
 
2006-07 | 2008
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.170:
Item Number:0084-S (online)
CGP systemNumber:000649624
 
December 30, 2019
Before The Second Division,

October 20, 1955

No. 59360.

protests 175625-K, etc. (New York).

#### Adorence Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

October 11, 1960

No. 64684.

#### Amity Fabrics, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/31303, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. D. *H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS 

OF" THE 

FECERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551 

December 23,2013 

SANDRA F. BRAUNSTEIN 

DIRECTOR 

DIVISION OF CONSUMER 

AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 

CA 13-24 

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS: 

SUBJECT: Revised RESP A Interagency Examination Procedures 

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all state 

member banks, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets. 

The Task Force on Consumer Compliance of the Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council recently approved the attached interagency examination procedures for 

The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESP A). These revised examination procedures 

supersede the RESPA interagency examination procedures transmitted with CA Letter 13-13. 

The attached procedures reflect recent amendments to Regulation X, issued by the 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB has published a series of 

rulemakings to implement the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

that will generally go into effect on January 10, 2014, including rules regarding mortgage 

servicing and homeownership counseling requirements. The attached procedures incorporate 

amendments to Regulation X finalized through October 1, 2013 and an interim final rule issued 

on October 15, 2013. The attached procedures also incorporate an advisory opinion contained in 

guidance issued by the CFPB on October 15, 2013, clarifying how certain provisions of the 

servicing rules interact with the "cease communications" requirement of the Fair Debt Collection 

Practices Act. 

If you have any questions, please contact Dana Miller, Senior Supervisory Consumer 

Financial Services Analyst, at (202) 452-2751, or Amy Henderson, Managing Counsel, at (202) 

452-3140. 

Attachment: Revised RESP A Interagency Examination Procedures 

Supersedes: CA 13-13 "Revised RESP A Interagency Examination Procedures" (August 21, 

2013)
Before the Third Division,

October 13, 1955

No. 59351.

protest 238449-K (New York).

#### Traders Service Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record disclosing nothing that would warrant disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 56236.

protest 169486-K (New York).

#### Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Nilo P, a combination of castor oil, oleic acid, and caustic potash, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 55174, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 11111)

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1037643, etc.

(Decided December 7, 1965)

*Lane, Young & Foco*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, fox the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, listed in schedule “A,” annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> That the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement consists of radios or radio sets exported from Japan subsequent to February 27, 1968.

> That the radios or radio sets are not identified in the Pinal List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27,1958; and that the said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,1958.

> That the merchandise, facts, and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Manhattan Novelty Corp.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 10888, wherein it was held that a buying commission paid to Hiraoka & Co., Ltd. by the plaintiff is a nondutiable item; and that the record in said case may he incorporated in and made a part of the record herein.

> That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, *708including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.

> That Reappraisement 63/14755 is abandoned as to merchandise invoiced as loud speakers.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeals for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts and upon the authority cited therein, I find and hold that the merchandise involved herein was exported from Japan on or after February 27, 1958; that said merchandise does not appear on the final list of articles published in T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and I find and hold that such statutory value is the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices; and that the claim in reappraisement R63/14755 as to the merchandise invoiced as loud speakers, having been abandoned, is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION

1350 OF CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cadence Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (Cadence) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Cadence, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadence.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of March 15, 2010.

/S/    THEODORE R.
SCHROEDERTheodore R. Schroeder President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)/S/    WILLIAM R.
LARUEWilliam R. LaRue Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cadence, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence and will be retained by Cadence and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                          11,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                     81,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,069
<PP&E>                                          23,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,135
<SALES>                                        247,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,072
<CGS>                                          139,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.24
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                  HOLOPAK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED                     SIX MONTHS ENDED 
                                                SEPTEMBER 30,                          SEPTEMBER 30,
                                           1996               1995                1996              1995
                                        ----------         ----------        ----------         ----------

<S>                                     <C>                <C>               <C>                <C>       
Weighted Average Number of
     Common  Shares Outstanding          3,347,689          3,517,989         3,347,689          3,517,989

Common Share Equivalents Based
     Upon the Treasury Stock Method         13,307                 --            24,372                 --

Common Share Equivalents Based
     Upon the Modified Treasury
     Stock Method                               --                 --                --                 --
                                        ----------         ----------        ----------         ----------

Total Common Shares and
     Common  Share Equivalents
     Outstanding                         3,360,996          3,517,989         3,372,061          3,517,989
                                        ----------         ----------        ----------         ----------

Earnings Per Common Share and
      Common Share Equivalents:

Continuing Operations                        (0.02)              0.06              0.05               0.16
Discontinued Operations                      (0.05)                --             (0.05)                --
                                        ----------         ----------        ----------         ----------

Net Income                              $    (0.07)        $     0.06        $     0.00         $     0.16
                                        ==========         ==========        ==========         ==========
</TABLE>
No. R67/70.

#### The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R61/12512, etc. (San Francisco).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 518, Reap. Dec. 10724), the court found and held that constructed value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for determining value of the canned meat exported from Argentina during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31,1959, and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices, and as stated in the entries and recited in said schedule “B,” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the canned meat covered by these appeals for reappraisement, said schedule “B,” being attached to and made a part of the decision.