October 1, 2020

Mr. Gabriel Rosenberg

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

450 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017

Dear Mr. Rosenberg:

This responds to your letters submitted on behalf of JPMorgan Chase & Co. 

(JPMC), New York, New York, and addressed to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 

(OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), and the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (collectively, the “agencies”) dated April 1, 2019, and November 

26, 2019. Your letters request, among other things, an exemption from the requirements of 

section 252.83 of the Board’s QFC Stay Rule1 for covered QFCs that are “non-U.S., non-linked 

contracts” and for which the counterparty is not a covered entity or an excluded bank.2 

Pursuant to section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), the Board has established restrictions on the QFCs of U.S. 

global systemically important bank holding companies (U.S. GSIBs) and the U.S. operations of 

foreign global systemically important banking organizations (foreign GSIBs). In general, the 

Board’s QFC Stay Rule requires U.S. GSIBs, companies controlled by a U.S. GSIB 

(subsidiaries), and the U.S. operations of foreign GSIBs (together, “covered entities”) to amend 

their derivatives, securities financing transactions, and certain other QFCs (together, “covered 

QFCs”) in two respects. First, the QFC Stay Rule requires that covered QFCs opt the 

counterparty into the stay-and-transfer treatment of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and 

Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act (U.S. special resolution regimes) to reduce the risk that a 

 1

 12 CFR 252.83. The agencies’ respective qualified financial contract stay rules (collectively, 

the “QFC Stay Rule”) can be found at 12 CFR part 47 (OCC); 12 CFR part 252, subpart I 

(Board); and 12 CFR part 382 (FDIC).

2

 The terms “covered entity” and “excluded bank” have the same meaning as in 12 CFR 

252.82(b) and 252.81, respectively. The Secretary of the Board, acting under delegated 

authority, had granted the firm’s request for temporary extensions of time until October 1, 2020, 

with respect to the contracts that are the subject of this request.
- 2 -

counterparty to a QFC governed by non-U.S. law would challenge the applicability of the U.S. 

special resolution regimes to the QFC.3

 Second, the QFC Stay Rule requires a QFC to prohibit 

the counterparty from exercising any cross-default rights (i.e., default rights based on the entry 

into resolution of an affiliate of the covered entity) unless a creditor protection condition 

permitted under the QFC Stay Rule (e.g., failure to perform under the contract) is met. Among 

other things, this requirement is intended to facilitate a single-point-of-entry resolution.4

As a U.S. GSIB, JPMC and its subsidiaries are subject to the QFC Stay Rule. 

Pursuant to section 252.88(d) of the Board’s QFC Stay Rule, the Board may exempt by order a

covered entity from conforming one or more contracts or types of contract to one or more of the 

requirements of the rule after considering (1) the potential impact of the exemption on the ability 

of the covered entity, or affiliates of the covered entity, to be resolved in a rapid and orderly 

manner in the event of the financial distress or failure of the entity; (2) the burden the exemption 

would relieve; and (3) any other factor the Board deems relevant.5 

In considering this exemption request, a “non-U.S., non-linked contract” is 

defined as a QFC that meets all of the following criteria: (i) no party to the QFC (other than a 

foreign subsidiary6 of JPMC) is a covered entity or excluded bank; (ii) the QFC is not guaranteed 

or otherwise supported7 by an affiliate8 of that foreign subsidiary that could itself be placed into 

one of the U.S. special resolution regimes;

9 (iii) the QFC is not linked10 to an affiliate of that 

foreign subsidiary; and (iv) the QFC contains no default rights that could be exercised against 

any other covered entity or excluded bank that itself could be placed into one of the U.S. special 

 3

 12 CFR 252.83(b). A covered QFC that meets both of the following requirements is not 

required to be conformed to the provisions of section 252.83(b) of the QFC Stay Rule: (1) the 

covered QFC states that it is governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United 

States; and (2) the QFC counterparty to the covered entity is an individual domiciled in the 

United States or a company that is incorporated in or organized under the laws of the United 

States or any state, has its principal place of business located in the United States or any state, or 

is a U.S. branch or agency. 12 CFR 252.83(a).

4

 12 CFR 252.84(b), (f), and (h); see also 12 CFR 252.85(a)–(b). 

5

 12 CFR 252.88(d).

6

 For purposes of this definition, “foreign subsidiary” means a company subject to the Board’s 

QFC Stay Rule that (i) is not incorporated in or organized under the laws of the United States or 

any state; (ii) does not have its principal place of business located in the United States, including 

any state; and (iii) is not a U.S. branch or U.S. agency. The terms “state,” “U.S. branch,” and 

“U.S. agency” have the same meanings as in 12 CFR 252.2.

7

 “Support” has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 380.12(b)(3).

8

 “Affiliate” has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 252.2.

9

 “U.S. special resolution regimes” has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 252.81.

10 “Linked” has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 380.12(b)(1). The term “specified financial 

condition clause” referenced in this definition has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 380.12(b)(2).
- 3 -

resolution regimes. The Board has considered the exemption request for non-U.S., non-linked 

contracts under the framework set out in section 252.88(d) of the QFC Stay Rule.

First, the requested exemption is unlikely to affect the ability of the firm to be 

resolved in a rapid and orderly manner in the event of the financial distress or failure of the firm. 

The QFC Stay Rule generally requires that QFCs governed by foreign law or entered into with a 

foreign counterparty include the counterparty’s agreement to be subject to the applicable stay-andtransfer provisions of the U.S. special resolution regimes, in an effort to reduce the risk that such 

counterparty would challenge those provisions. However, a foreign subsidiary of a U.S. GSIB 

could not be placed directly into a proceeding under one of the U.S. special resolution regimes, 

and U.S. law would not prevent the exercise of default rights in non-U.S., non-linked contracts 

against the foreign subsidiary of a U.S. GSIB. Therefore, exempting QFCs that would not be 

subject to the stay-and-transfer treatment of the U.S. special resolution regimes would not appear 

to impact the ability of a U.S. GSIB to be resolved in an orderly manner. Further, the vast 

majority of QFCs entered into between material entities of the U.S. GSIBs (including foreign 

subsidiaries) already have been conformed to the rule’s requirements through adherence to the 

universal protocol and will continue to be subject to the rule’s requirements.

11 

Second, the requested exemption would relieve significant burden. You have 

represented that there are a significant number of unconformed non-U.S., non-linked contracts 

and that conforming these contracts to the requirements of the Board’s QFC Stay Rule would 

entail significant time and expense. Specifically, you have represented that the firm would 

experience considerable burden in educating counterparties regarding the requirements of the 

rule, negotiating amendments to the relevant contracts, and executing and reviewing such 

amendments. 

For these reasons, the requested exemption would not appear to have a significant 

impact on the ability of the firm to be resolved in an orderly manner and would relieve 

significant burden. Accordingly, the Board has granted JPMC an exemption for non-U.S., nonlinked contracts that meet the criteria described on pages two and three of this letter from the 

requirements of 12 CFR 252.83.

12

This action may be revised or revoked, based on changes to applicable regulations 

or other relevant factors. This action is based on all the facts of record, including the information 

discussed above, and the representations in your submissions and supplemental information. 

Any material change in those facts or representations could affect this approval and should be 

communicated promptly to Board staff.

 11 12 CFR 252.85(a). “Universal protocol” is defined at 12 CFR 252.85(a)(3)(i). The 

conformed QFCs between U.S. GSIB entities represent over 95 percent of the notional value of 

derivatives of the firms and a significant portion of other QFCs, including those most concerning 

from an interconnectedness perspective.

12 In considering this request, Board staff consulted with staff of the OCC and FDIC in an effort 

to maintain consistent interpretations under the QFC Stay Rule. 
- 4 -

Please contact Lucy Chang at (202) 475-6331 or Evan Hechtman at (202) 263-

4810, both of the Board’s Legal Division, or Lesley Chao at (202) 974-7063 or Rebecca Alper at 

(202) 475-6321, both of the Board’s Division of Supervision and Regulation, if you have any 

questions.

Very truly yours,

Margaret McCloskey Shanks

Deputy Secretary of the Board

cc: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation