alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Certification**

I, Jordan Welsh, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board of Razor Resources (the "Company"), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB/A of the Company.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and have:

    a.    designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byother within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

    b.    (paragraph omitted pursuantto SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;)

    c.    evaluated the effectivenessof the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

    d.    disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the Company's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting ; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of theCompany's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a.    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

    b.    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/ "Jordan Welsh"

Jordan Welsh

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer)

March 14, 2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00146-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.A., a Child

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2000EM502104

Honorable Eric Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 30, 2014

MOTION DENIED AS MOOT; DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On March 3, 2014, appellant Susan Idalia Anderson Costner filed a “Motion for Leave to 

File Late Notice of Appeal” in this court. However, no notice of appeal appears to have been filed 

in the trial court or in this court. 

This court’s jurisdiction is invoked by the timely filing of a notice of appeal. Molina v. 

Housing Authority of the City of San Antonio, No. 04-04-00774-CV, 2004 WL 2715903, *1 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio Dec. 1, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op.); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). Because it 

appeared appellant did not file a notice of appeal, we ordered her to file a written response in this 

court on or before April 11, 2014, establishing that she has timely filed a notice of appeal and 

thereby invoked this court’s jurisdiction. We advised that if appellant failed to satisfactorily 
04-14-00146-CV

respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response. 

Accordingly, we hold appellant has not invoked this court’s jurisdiction, and we: (1) deny 

her motion for leave to file late notice of appeal as moot, and (2) dismiss the appeal. See Molina 

v. Housing Authority of the City of San Antonio, No. 04-04-00774-CV, 2004 WL 2715903, *1 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 1, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op.); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). 

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 405

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representa3 tives, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 4919) to amend

4 the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export

5 Control Act to make improvements to certain defense and
2

•HCON 405 EH

1 security assistance provisions under those Acts, to author2 ize the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign coun3 tries, and for other purposes, shall make the following cor4 rections:

5 (1) On page 34, line 1, insert ‘‘on a grant

6 basis’’ after ‘‘available’’.

7 (2) On page 34, line 11, strike ‘‘paragraph (1)’’

8 and insert ‘‘subsection (b)(1) and paragraph (1) of

9 this subsection’’.

10 (3) On page 36, line 19, insert ‘‘on a grant

11 basis’’ after ‘‘available’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 405

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of H.R. 4919.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                        15
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,320)
<INVENTORY>                                     16,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,261
<PP&E>                                          45,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,486)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,603
<BONDS>                                          1,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              187
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,120
<SALES>                                         36,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,001
<CGS>                                           34,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    28
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (18)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.73)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


AULTRA
GOLD INC.


FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Rauno
Perttu, Chief Financial Officer of Aultra Gold Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Annual Report on Form 10 -K/A the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which this certification accompanies (the "Annual
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




DATE:
      October 29, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Rauno PerttuName:
      Rauno PerttuTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THECHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C §1350

 

I, Kathleen Mason, the Chief Executive Officer ofTuesday Morning Corporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.              The quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Tuesday Morning Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2009fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              The information contained in theabove-mentioned report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Tuesday Morning Corporation.

 
| Date: January 28, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Kathleen Mason      |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                        |   | Kathleen Mason          |
|                        |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11501

Conference Calendar

 

BILLY FRANK DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DIXIE BURKS, Nurse; 

JOHN GAGE, Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CV-1838-H

---------------------

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Billy Frank Davis, Texas prisoner # 529030, has failed to

comply with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of

1995 (PLRA), Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, within the time

specified by the Clerk of this court. Davis’ notice of appeal

was filed after April 26, 1996, the date the President signed the

PLRA; thus, the PLRA applies to this appeal. See Jackson v.

Stinnett, 102 F.3d 132, 136-37 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the

appeal is DISMISSED. Fifth Cir. Loc. R. 42.3.

In Carter v. Gonzales, No. 96-50248 (5th Cir. Aug. 29, 1996)

(unpublished), we warned Davis that any additional frivolous
O R D E R

No. 

- 2 -

appeals would invite the imposition of sanctions. We now repeat

that warning.

APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING REPEATED.
FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule Higgins, Cortney to: RobertJ Wayland 03/15/2011 08:55 PM Cc: Karen Thundiyil, Bill Maxwell

Mar7_2011_Earthjustice_Handout.pdf

Hi Bob, Consistent with our Executive Order, attached is the handout from this meeting.

Regards, Cortney

When: Monday, March 07, 2011 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
Where: 10103 NEOB

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Stephanie Maddin, Earthjustice has requested this meeting.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Robert I. Kriebel, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Neose Technologies, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|November 5, 2003 Date |  | /s/ Robert I. Kriebel                            
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | Robert I. Kriebel                                
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



2
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/10/2010 02:34 PM
-----
|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US                                                                                                                 
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov                                                                                                               
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred 
Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA                                          |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |08/09/2010 04:19 PM                                                                                                                       
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|
  |guidance memo on residential/institutional/commercial emergency engine 
definition                                                         |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------|




Cortney,
Attached is the draft memo per your request.
(See attached file: Guidance on RICE NESHAP residential-institutional-
commercial emergency engine definition.doc)

Melanie King
Energy Strategies Group
Sector Policies and Programs Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency

Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC  27711

Phone:  (919) 541-2469
Fax:       (919) 541-5450
king.melanie@epa.gov
# L_2013231EN.01002501.xml

| 29.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 231/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 231/25

---

NOTICE TO READERS

| Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 36/2013 was withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank. |
| --- |

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 36/2013 was withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank.

---
No. 53344.

protests 147014-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bridgetts & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 58751.

protests 215068-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of china figures similar in all material respects to the figures passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the qlaim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                           CONTINENTAL CIRCUITS CORP.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
                                                                 --------------------------
                                                                  1997      1996      1995
                                                                 ------    ------    ------
                                                             (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                                              <C>       <C>       <C>  
Primary:
Average shares outstanding                                        7,237     7,152     6,504
Net effect of dilutive stock options--based on the treasury
  stock method using average market price                           195       278       243
                                                                 ------    ------    ------
Totals                                                            7,432     7,430     6,747
                                                                 ======    ======    ======
Net income                                                       $8,022    $6,283    $6,654
                                                                 ======    ======    ======
Per share amount                                                 $ 1.08    $ 0.85    $ 0.99
                                                                 ======    ======    ======
Fully diluted:
Average shares outstanding                                        7,237     7,152     6,504
Net effect of dilutive stock options--based on the treasury
  stock method using the year-end market price if higher than
  the average market price                                          295       278       292
                                                                 ------    ------    ------
Totals                                                            7,532     7,430     6,796
                                                                 ======    ======    ======
Net income                                                       $8,022    $6,283    $6,654
                                                                 ======    ======    ======
Per share amount                                                 $ 1.07    $ 0.85    $ 0.98
                                                                 ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 303 Agreed to April 13, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Thursday, April 13, 2000, or Friday, April 14, 2000, on a motion

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

or his designee, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday,

May 2, 2000, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second

day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that

when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business

on Thursday, April 13, 2000, or Friday, April 14, 2000, on a motion

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, April 25, 2000, or such time on that day as may be specified

by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are

notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 303—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

By

Deputy Clerk.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Before the Second Division,

September 9, 1954

No. 58369.

protests 219972-K and 217668-K (New York).

#### Indian Sales Corporation and Industrial Operations, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of speedometers or parts thereof, in chief value of metal, designed and intended for use only on motorcycles, similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Industrial Operations, Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 82, C. D. 1500), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.