alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 53852.

#### W. Fein & Sons *v.*United States,

protest 139525-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of rabbit hair similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of Abstract 53024. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of America Service GroupInc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter and nine month period ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.Dated:November 8, 2006       Name: /s/ Michael Catalano Title: Chairman, President &    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT B

                       MATERIAL CONTRACTS AND OBLIGATIONS

As of the Closing  Date,  Genesis is a newly formed  Company and has no material
contracts or obligations. Michael A. Kirk, as a Founding Shareholder and Officer
of the newly formed  corporation,  has entered into certain agreements on behalf
of the Company.  Such  agreements  are for the purpose of opening the  corporate
offices  in a timely  fashion,  have been or will be  assumed  and  ratified  by
Genesis. Such agreements include a lease agreement,  agreements for the purchase
of office furniture and equipment,  and agreements for phone service and similar
items.
No. 66619.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/19466, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10, 1955, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor more than 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) *389all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).
Exhibit 99.1   Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
               Compliance of Washington Mutual Bank

                             WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The  undersigned  officer of  Washington  Mutual  Bank (the  "Servicer")  hereby
certifies  on behalf of the  Servicer  and on his own behalf for purposes of the
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR9, as follows:

1. I am the duly appointed and qualified Senior Vice President of the Servicer.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Servicer.

4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 1, 2006.




                     WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK


                     By: /s/ Henry J. Berens
                         -------------------------------------
                         Henry J. Berens
                         Senior Vice President
No. 66166.

#### Gonzales & Blanco *v.*United States,

protests 265765-K, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61637.

#### Colgate Palmolive Peet Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 179656-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

No effort having been made to present evidence on the issues involved herein, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
**1995-  vegetables_01.18.95vegetables_04.13.95vegetables_07.14.95vegetables_09.15.95vegetables_10.13.95

**
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 6, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00413-CR

NO. 14-22-00414-CR

NO. 14-22-00415-CR

____________

JACOB DAVIDSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1731987, 1731986, & 1731988

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jacob Davidson appeals three judgments of conviction, each on a 

charge of burglary of a habitation. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in 

which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief 

meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting 

a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no
2

arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 

60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Wilson.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000874534
<NAME> OUTDOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,804
<PP&E>                                       1,876,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,756,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,006
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,844
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,756,826
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               705,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               491,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,179
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,142
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
 

PAYMENT INFORMATION FORM
 

 

Community Name: 

Project Identifier:

MT-1 application 

T-2 application 

 

Type of Request: 

 

 

THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED, ALONG WITH THE APPROPRIATE FEE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW OR E-MAILED TO THE E-MAIL 

ADDRESS BELOW.

Please make check or money order payable to the National Flood Insurance Program. 

 

E

): _______________ Check No.: ____ _________ __ Amou nt: 

INITIAL FEE FINAL FEE FEE BALANCE** MASTER CARD VISA MONEY ORDER 

 

— — —

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Month 

 _________________________________________________________________ 

: 

 

 

 


 


 

M

Request No. (if known

* CHECK 

*Note: Check only for EDR and/or Alluvial Fan requests (as appropriate).

**Note: Check only if submitting a corrected fee for an ongoing request. 

DR application 

LOMC Clearinghouse 

3601 Eisenhower Ave. Suite 500 Alexandria, VA 

22304-6426

Attn.: LOMC Manager 

FEMA Project Library 

3601 Eisenhower Ave. Suite 500 Alexandria, VA 

22304-6426

E-mail: FEMA-EngineeringLibrary@fema.dhs.gov

COMPLETE THIS SECTION ONLY IF PAYING BY CREDIT CARD 

CARD NUMBER EXP. DATE 

—

Year 

Date Signature 

NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON CARD)

(please print or type) 

ADDRESS: 

(for your 

credit card 

receipt-please 

print or type) 

DAYTIME PHONE:

FEMA Form 81-107 Payment Information Form
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,670
<SECURITIES>                                    15,649
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,102
<PP&E>                                          17,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,208
<BONDS>                                          8,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,357
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   265
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,592)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.90)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code
  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Technology Solutions Company.
 Date: May 15, 2008
    By:
    /s/ MILTON G. SILVA-CRAIGMilton G. Silva-Craig.
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 11.1

                         RAILTEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

                                                            FOR THE THREE MONTHS
                                                               ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                              ----------------
                                                               1997      1996
                                                              ------    ------

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION:

Net income ...............................................    $1,575    $2,183
                                                              ======    ======

Weighted average number of common stock and
 common stock equivalents outstanding:
    Weighted average number of shares of common stock
      outstanding.........................................     9,132     9,111
    Weighted average number of common stock equivalents                     
      applicable to stock options.........................        77       114
                                                              ------    ------
    Common stock and common stock equivalents ............     9,209     9,225 
                                                              ======    ====== 
    Earnings per share - primary .........................    $ 0.17    $ 0.24 
                                                              ======    ====== 
                                                              
                                                             

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION (1):

Net income ...............................................    $1,575    $2,183
                                                              ======    ======

Weighted average number of common stock and
 common stock equivalents outstanding:
    Weighted average number of shares of common stock
      outstanding.........................................    9,132     9,111
    Weighted average number of common stock equivalents                       
      applicable to stock options.........................       77       129
                                                             ------    ------
    Common stock assuming full dilution ..................    9,209     9,240
                                                             ======    ======
    Earnings per share - fully diluted ...................   $ 0.17    $ 0.24
                                                             ======    ======
                                                             
                                                              

(1)      This calculation is submitted in accordance with item 601(b)11 of
         regulation S-K although it is not required by APB Opinion No. 15
         because it results in dilution of less than 3.0%.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### CORRECTED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30146 Summary Calendar JULES DUPERON Plaintiff-Appellant v. DARRYL MIZELL, Lieutenant; DAVID EDWARDS, Sergeant; JOSHUA MILEY, Sergeant; SERGEANT RONNIE SPEARS Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CV-3325 Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jules Duperon appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit alleging that several correctional officers at Washington Correctional Institute violated his civil rights by beating him. Specifically, he argues that the magistrate judge erred in dismissing his suit for failure to prosecute. The Government counters United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 14, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-30146

2 that we need not consider whether the dismissal for failure to prosecute was proper because Duperon hasfailed tochallenge the dismissal on the independent ground that he failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because Duperon has failed to make an argument pursuant to F ED. R. A PP. P. 28(a)(9)(A) challenging the dismissal ofhis suit for failure tostate a claim, he is deemed to have abandoned the issue. See Royal Ins. Co. of Amer. v. Caliber One Indem. Co., 465 F.3d 614, 621 n.34 (5th Cir. 2006); G eiger v. Jowers, 404 F.3d 371, 373 n.6 (5th Cir. 2005). AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23491]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 23-11]


Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment; Bal Container Line 
Co., Limited, Complainant v. SSA Marine Terminal and SSA Terminals 
(Pier A), LLC, Respondents

Served: October 19, 2023.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (the ``Commission'') by Bal Container Line Co., 
Limited (the ``Complainant'') against SSA Marine Terminal and SSA 
Terminals (Pier A), LLC (the ``Respondents''). Complainant states that 
the Commission has jurisdiction over the complaint under the Shipping 
Act of 1984, as amended, 46 U.S.C. 40101 et seq., and jurisdiction over 
the Respondents as a marine terminal operator.
    Complainant is an entity with a principal place of business in Hong 
Kong and a vessel operating common carrier.
    Complainant identifies Respondent SSA Marine Terminal as a Delaware 
limited liability company with a principal place of business in 
Seattle, Washington.
    Complainant identifies Respondent SSA Terminals (Pier A), LLC as a 
limited liability company with a principal place of business in 
Seattle, Washington.
    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) 
and 46 CFR part 545 regarding a failure to establish, observe, and 
enforce just and reasonable regulations and practices relating to or 
connected with receiving, handling, storing, or delivering property. 
Complainant alleges these violations arose from an assessment of a flat 
rate congestion surcharge without a stated relationship to actual 
terminal congestion and continued assessment of congestion surcharges 
while containers were placed in inaccessible terminal areas.
    An answer to the complaint must be filed with the Commission within 
25 days after the date of service.
    The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's 
electronic Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/23-11/. This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of 
Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding judge 
shall be issued by October 21, 2024, and the final decision of the 
Commission shall be issued by May 5, 2025.

Carl Savoy,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-23491 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 31

To designate a flagpole upon which the flag of the United States is to

be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the

line of duty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. TIERNEY (for himself, Mr. LARSON, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. SAXTON, Mr.

MEEHAN, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. TAYLOR

of Mississippi, Mr. FROST, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr.

HOLDEN, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BORSKI, and

Mr. RAMSTAD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To designate a flagpole upon which the flag of the United

States is to be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the line of duty.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. INSTRUCTION.

4 (a) SLAIN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.—The

5 Capitol Police Board shall designate or establish a flagpole

6 upon which the flag of the United States shall be flown

7 at half-staff for one day whenever a Federal, State, local,
2

HCON 31 IH

1 or territorial law enforcement officer is slain in the line

2 of duty.

3 (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROCEDURES.—The Capitol

4 Police Board shall establish efficient and effective proce5 dures to execute subsection (a), and to—

6 (1) ensure that the official responsible for set7 ting the flag of the United States is informed or

8 learns promptly of the slaying of any law enforce9 ment officer;

10 (2) post public notice in close proximity to the

11 flag being flown at half-staff of the name, tenure of

12 service, and jurisdiction of a slain law enforcement

13 officer being honored; and

14 (3) present the flag of the United States which

15 is flown at half-staff in honor of a slain law enforce16 ment officer to the family of the slain law enforce17 ment officer.

Æ
No. 64664.

#### Chester K. Stoner *v.*United States,

protest 308935-K (Philadelphia).

*308Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of carrizo baskets tbe same in all material respects as those tbe subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.