alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# -i~~2=:'~~1ll> ERICKSON AIR-CRANE INCORPORATED January 28,2014 Nichole Tennyson Legal Counsel Phone: 503-505-5883 E-mail: ntennyson@ericksonaircrane.com

= Department ofTransportation Essential Air Service Program 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Room W86-308 Washington, DC 20590 Attention: Kevin Adams, Greg Frazier Re: !lJlcoming Name Change, Contract Order 2013-6-11 Dear Mr. Adams, Mr. Frazier, 

## lJ

As part ofour continued integration effOJ1srelated to our acquisition ofEvergreen Helicopters, Inc., we would liketo share with you exciting news that you mayor may not already be aware of. We will be legally changing the name ofEvergreen Helicopters, Inc. to Erickson Helicopters, Inc. inthe coming weeks. The company will remain a separate legal entity and awholly owned subsidiary ofErickson Air-Crane Incorporated. You will receive formal notification once the name change becomes effective but we wanted to give you aheads upthat this change is coming inthe near future. Once the change is effective we will work through any required notification and! ormodification processes that are required in our agreement. Feel free to contact me should you have any questions or concerns.

# /jiJl)

Nichole Tennyson

5550 SWMacadam Avenue, Suite 200 •Portland, OR 97239' Phone (503) 505-5800 •Fax (503) 473-8540 www.ericksonaircrane.com
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 11.1


                            SPECTRUM HOLOBYTE, INC.
            STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                               December 31,            December 31,
                                           --------------------    --------------------
                                             1996        1995        1996        1995
                                           --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                       <C>         <C>         <C>         <C> 
Net income (loss) before extraordinary
  item                                     $  5,658    $ (9,947)   $  3,306    $ (30,936)
Cumulative dividends on Series A
  preferred stock                               (70)        (70)       (210)        (210)
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
Net income (loss) for the purposes
  of calculating the earnings per 
  share before extraordinary item             5,588     (10,017)      3,096      (31,146)
Extraordinary item, net of tax effect            --          --       3,547           --
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
Net income (loss) for the purposes
  of calculating the earnings per
  share                                    $  5,588    $(10,017)   $  6,643    $ (31,146)
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
    Shares used in per share
      computations                           28,470      24,228      27,281       23,448
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------

Net income (loss) per share:
    Net income (loss) before 
      extraordinary item                   $   0.20    $  (0.41)   $   0.11    $   (1.33)
    Extraordinary item, net of
      tax effect                                 --          --        0.13           --
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
    Net income (loss)                      $   0.20    $  (0.41)    $  0.24    $   (1.33)
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
                                          ---------    --------    --------    ---------
</TABLE>


THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES AND COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS ARE
       THE SAME FOR PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE.
DVI Business Credit

Asset Based HealthCare Financing

4041 Macarthur Blvd., Suite 401

Newport Beach, CA 92660

Telephone 949-474-6100

Facsimile 949-474-6199

 

October 30, 2001

 

HealthCare Integrated Services, Inc.

Shrewsbury Executive Center II

1040 Broad Street

Shrewsbury, NJ 07702

Att:  Elliott H. Vernon, Esq.

 

RE:          LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATEDDecember 26, 1996 BY AND BETWEEN HealthCare Integrated Services, Inc.("Borrower") AND DVI BUSINESS CREDIT CORPORATION ("Lender")(as amended from time to time, the "Loan Agreement")

 

Dear Mr. Vernon:

 

In my letter dated September 6, 2001, I advised youthat DVI Business Credit would extend the expiration date of the Loan Agreementfrom September 24, 2001 to October 31, 2001 to provide us with additional timeto review your credit line facility.

 

DVIBC desires to again further extend the expirationdate of the Loan Agreement from October 31, 2001 to December 15, 2001.

 

By your signature below, you hereby agree to theextension described above.  However, ifthis Extension Letter is not fully executed by the parties noted herein andreceived back within three (3) business days from the date of this letter,Lender herewith gives Borrower the requisite Notices of its Intent to Terminatethe Loan Agreement effective with the close of business October 31, 2001.

 

Lender reserves all of its rights and remedies provided under the LoanAgreement and at law until all amounts owed by Borrower to Lender, includingall assessed interest, fees, and charges due to Lender, are paid in full.

 

Should you have any questions with regard to thisnotice, please contact me at 949-474-5833 at your earliest convenience.

 

Sincerely,

 

DVI BUSINESS CREDIT CORPORATION

 

/s/ Vim Veerachaylukana

Vim Veerachaylukana

Account Executive
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4


            FIRST AMENDMENT TO NOTE AND WARRANT PURCHASE AGREEMENT


This Amendment ("Amendment") amends that certain Note and Warrant Purchase 
Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of August 25, 1998, and executed by Eco 
Soil Systems, Inc., in favor of the purchasers listed in the Schedule A 
attached thereto as follows:

1.    The phrases "or the IB Credit Agreement" is hereby inserted immediately 
after the phrase "the Credit Agreement" in each of the places it appears in 
Section 13.2.

2.    The following new definition is hereby added, alphabetically, to 
Section 14 to read in its entirety as follows:

          "IB CREDIT AGREEMENT" that certain agreement entitled "Credit 
Agreement," dated as of December 7, 1998, by and between the Company and 
Imperial Bank, as amended from time to time."


3.   Except as provided above, the Agreement remains unchanged.

4.   This Amendment is effective as of December 7, 1998, and the parties 
hereby confirm that the Agreement as amended is in full force and effect.


ECO SOIL SYSTEMS, INC.


By:   /s/
    ----------------------------

Title:
       -------------------------


ALBION ALLIANCE MEZZANINE FUND, L.P.

By    Albion Alliance L.L.C.
      Its General Partner


      By:     /s/
          ------------------------

      Title:
             ---------------------


PARIABAS CAPITAL FUNDING LLC

By:    /s/  [ILLEGIBLE]
    ------------------------------

Title:
        --------------------------
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


                                AMENDMENT TO THE

                            FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.

             EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


         WHEREAS, Finlay Enterprises, Inc. (the "Corporation") maintains the
Finlay Enterprises, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Plan");

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the Article 12 of the Plan, the Corporation may
amend the Plan at any time; and

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to correct a
scrivener's error in Section 6.4 of the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of May 1,
2003, as follows:

         1. The first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 6.4 of the
Plan is amended by substituting "April 1" in lieu of "March 1" therein.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed this 19th day of
June, 2003.


                                              FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.


                                              By: /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Arthur E. Reiner
                                                  Chairman, President and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 221

Authorizing printing of the brochures entitled ‘‘How Our Laws Are Made’’

and ‘‘Our American Government’’, the pocket version of the United

States Constitution, and the document-sized, annotated version of the

United States Constitution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1999

Mr. THOMAS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

NOVEMBER 9, 1999

The Committee on House Administration discharged; considered under

suspension of the rules and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing printing of the brochures entitled ‘‘How Our

Laws Are Made’’ and ‘‘Our American Government’’, the

pocket version of the United States Constitution, and

the document-sized, annotated version of the United

States Constitution.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF DOCUMENTS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the documents referred

5 to in section 2 shall be printed as a House document, in
2

•HCON 221 ATH

1 a style and manner determined by the Joint Committee

2 on Printing.

3 (b) ADDITIONAL COPIES FOR HOUSE AND SEN4 ATE.—There shall be printed for the use of the House of

5 Representatives and the Senate an aggregate number of

6 copies of the documents printed under subsection (a) not

7 to exceed the lesser of—

8 (1) 2,200,000; or

9 (2) the maximum number of copies for which

10 the aggregate printing cost does not exceed an

11 amount established by the Joint Committee on

12 Printing.

13 SEC. 2. DOCUMENTS DESCRIBED.

14 The documents referred to in this section are as fol15 lows:

16 (1) The 1999 revised edition of the brochure

17 entitled ‘‘How Our Laws Are Made’’.

18 (2) The 1999 revised edition of the brochure

19 entitled ‘‘Our American Government’’.

20 (3) The 20th edition of the pocket version of

21 the United States Constitution.

22 (4) The 1999 edition of the document-sized, an23 notated version of the United States Constitution.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          17,593
<SECURITIES>                                    14,697
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,667
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,023
<PP&E>                                          12,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           179
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,444
<SALES>                                         39,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (539)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,418
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        $427,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,696,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,360,624
<PP&E>                                       9,375,006
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,234,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,593,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,558,272
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     66,000
<COMMON>                                        49,620
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,083,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,593,359
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,680,450
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,567,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, George
J. Vergis, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley ACT of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ George J. Vergis
-------------------------------------
George J. Vergis
Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: May 4, 2006
      ---------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL RIDEAUX, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C05-2100-RSL

)

v. )

)

REED HOLTGEERTS, et al., ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

) MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

Defendants. ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

____________________________________)

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s civil rights complaint, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary

injunctive relief, the Report and Recommendation of Judge James P. Donohue, United States

Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for defendants,

and to the Honorable James P. Donohue.

DATED this 12th day of October, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-02100-RSL Document 37 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 1
# C_2022478EN.01002201.xml

| 16.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 478/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 478/22

---

DECISION

(2022/C 478/09)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended, in particular, by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (2) and, in particular, Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

Having regard to the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE),

Having regard to the expiry, on 31 December 2022, of the following European Parliament reserve lists and lists of suitable candidates: PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/186/S, PE/219/S, PE/226/S – 1, PE/226/S – 2, PE/226/S – 3, PE/226/S – 4, PE/227/S, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AD/2/18, AST/1/13, AST/2/16 (P), AST/1/17,

Having regard to the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meetings of 19 October and 16 November 2022,

HAS DECIDED

Article 1

The period of validity of the following reserve lists and lists of suitable candidates:

PE/168/S, PE/186/S, PE/226/S – 1, PE/226/S – 2, PE/226/S – 3, PE/226/S – 4, PE/227/S, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AST/1/13 and AST/1/17, shall be extended until 31 December 2023.

Article 2

The period of validity of the following reserve lists and lists of suitable candidates:

PE/171/S, PE/219/S, AD/2/18 and AST/2/16 (P), shall not be extended.

Luxembourg, 6 December 2022.

Klaus WELLE

The Secretary-General

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Conditions of Employment of Other Servants) (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.

2

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### SEP 19 2000 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT L. JAMISON,

Petitioner-Appellant,
v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE CLEMENCY & PAROLE BOARD; MARVIN L. NICKELS, Commandant,

Respondents-Appellees. No. 00-3021 (D.C. No. 97-CV-3493) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY, PORFILIO, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Petitioner Robert L. Jamison, a military prisoner appearing pro se, appeals from the denial of his petition for habeas relief f iled under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He argues that the 1988 Department of Defense Directiv e 1325.4, as applied to him, violates the Ex Post Facto and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. He maintains that the 1968 version o f the same directive should apply to him. The district court determined that t he 1988 directive was no more onerous than the 1968 version and that its retrospe ctive application was not an ex post facto violation. See R. doc. 23; see also Jefferson v. Hart , No. 91-3232- RDR, 1993 WL 302137, at *4 (D. Kan. July 29, 1993), aff’d , 84 F.3d 1314 (10th Cir. 1996). We review de novo the district court’s denial of ha beas relief under § 2241. See Patterson v. Knowles , 162 F.3d 574, 575 (10th Cir. 1998). We have revi ewed petitioner’s brief, the district court’s order, andthe record on appeal. We find no error and AFFIRM for substantially the same reasons as those set forth in the district court’s November 30, 1999 order.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
SECTION F

TOLERANCE PROPOSAL

Tolerances are proposed for combined residues of spiromesifen: 2-oxo-3-(2,4,6-

trimethylphenyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-en-4-yl 3,3-dimethylbutanoate, its enol metabolite 

(4-hydroxy- 3-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-1-oxaspiro [4.4 ] non-3-en-2-one) and its 

metabolites containing the 4-hydroxymethyl moiety (4-hydroxy-3-[4-(hydroxymethyl)-

2,6-dimethyl phenyl]-1-oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-en-2-one), calculated as parent compound 

equivalents, on the following commodities from crops grown as rotational crops:

Rotational Crop

Commodity

Plant-Back

Interval

Proposed 

Tolerance (Ppm)

vegetable , bulb, (Crop Group 3-07) 30 0.07
Case No. 13,020.

#### SMITH v. CAROLIN.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 99.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1802.

Notes — Subscribing Witness — Obligation to Produce.

If there he a subscribing witness to an instrument, evidence of the confession of the defendant will not dispense with the testimony of the subscribing witness.

Debt on a promissory note.

Mr. Jones, for plaintiff,

produced a note having a subscribing witness who was not present in court, and offered to prove that the defendant acknowledged the note to be his.

Mr. Toungs, for defendant,

objected, and cited Esp. N. P. 256, 781.

KILTY, Chief Judge, contra,.

The plaintiff became nonsuit.

THE COURT

refused to admit the testimony, on the general ground that the non-production of the subscribing witness induces a suspicion that if produced, he would testify something to the defendant’s advantage. Peake, Ev. 7, 64r-66.
No. 57535.

#### J. Weinig & Son *v.*United States,

protests 150409-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. O. *Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.