alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 327

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the service and sacrifice during periods of

war by members of the United States merchantmarine.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 327

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas throughout the history of the United States, the

United States merchant marine has served the Nation

during periods of war;

Whereas vessels of the United States merchant marine fleet,

such as the S.S. LANE VICTORY, provided critical

logistical support to the Armed Forces by carrying equip-
2

•HCON 327 EH

ment, supplies, and personnel necessary to maintain war

efforts;

Whereas numerous members of the United States merchant

marine have died to secure peace and freedom; and

Whereas at a time when the people of the United States are

recognizing the contributions of the Armed Forces and

civilian personnel to the national security, it is appropriate to recognize the service of the United States merchant marine: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) honors the service and sacrifice during peri4 ods of war by members of the United States mer5 chant marine;

6 (2) recognizes the critical role played by vessels

7 of the United States merchant marine fleet, such as

8 the S.S. LANE VICTORY, in transporting equip9 ment, supplies, and personnel necessary to support

10 war efforts; and

11 (3) encourages—

12 (A) the American people, through appro13 priate ceremonies and activities, to recognize

14 and commemorate the service and sacrifices of

15 the United States merchant marine; and
3

•HCON 327 EH

1 (B) all government agencies to take appro2 priate steps to commemorate the United States

3 merchant marine.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 61652.

#### Nixon Nitration Works *v.*United States,

protest 230144-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “BB” camphor powder the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 61198, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10


                         AGREEMENT
     
     
     Technology Solutions Company, a Delaware corporation
doing business as TSC, and Jack N. Hayden ("Hayden") enter
into this agreement ("Agreement") as of   February 26, 1999.

     WHEREAS, Hayden has been employed by TSC since 1992 in
various positions and pursuant to several employment
agreements.
     WHEREAS, on January 19, 1996, Hayden executed his
current employment agreement ("Employment Agreement") in
which TSC agreed to employ him as an Executive Vice
President.
     WHEREAS, Hayden resigned his position as Executive Vice
President effective August 5, 1998, and entered into a
letter of understanding ("Letter") pursuant to which he
agreed, among other things, to continue to provide advisory
services to TSC as a part-time employee. The Letter provided
further that Hayden would terminate his employment with TSC
on February 28, 1999.
     WHEREAS, Hayden and TSC have now agreed that he shall
not terminate his employment with TSC.
     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements and
covenants contained in this Agreement, TSC and Hayden agree
as follows:

1.   Hayden will not terminate his employment with TSC
     effective February 28, 1999.

2.   Hayden will continue his part time employment pursuant
     to the Letter until April 1, 1999 and on that date commence
     his full-time employment pursuant to the Employment
     Agreement subject to the following amendments:

    (a)  Hayden's position shall be changed to Group President.

    (b)  Hayden's new base salary shall be $480 thousand per
         annum.


Technology Solutions Company             Jack N. Hayden
                                    

By: John T. Kohler                       JACK N. HAYDEN
                                         
Position: President & CEO_
# L_2022100EN.01005401.xml

| 28.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 100/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 100/54

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/492

of 24 March 2022

electing the President of the European Council

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 2 July 2019, by European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 (1), Mr Charles MICHEL was elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2019 until 31 May 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 2 July 2019, by European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 (1), Mr Charles MICHEL was elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2019 until 31 May 2022.

| (2) | In accordance with the Treaty on European Union, the holder of the office of President of the European Council may be re-elected once, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with the Treaty on European Union, the holder of the office of President of the European Council may be re-elected once,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Charles MICHEL is hereby re-elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 June 2022 until 30 November 2024.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Mr Charles MICHEL by the Secretary-General of the Council.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2022.

For the Council

The President

C. MICHEL

---

(1)  European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 of 2 July 2019 electing the President of the European Council (OJ L 179 I, 3.7.2019, p. 1).

1

---
No. 66160.

#### Florea *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/4437, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Con. Res. 27 Agreed to February 12, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Friday, February 12, 1999, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m.

on Tuesday, February 23, 1999, or until noon on the second day

after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2

of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when

the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, February 11, 1999, Friday, February 12, 1999, Saturday, February 13, 1999, or Sunday, February 14, 1999, pursuant to a motion

made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, pursuant to this

concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

on Monday, February 22, 1999, or such time on that day as may

be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion

to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 27—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Before the First Division,

March 21, 1961

No. 65311.

#### North Eastern Fisheries Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 60/13360, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended
October 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Annmarie
Gayle, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Michael Midgley, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1)
This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    Annmarie Gayle       |  | /s/
    Michael Midgley    
|---------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Chief
    Executive Officer  |  | Chief
    Financial Officer
|                             |  |                            
|Date:
    April     23, 2019 |  | Date:
    April 23, 2019
This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not *

materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral

argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and

10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

September 25, 2007

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JAMES A. MCKEIGHAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-3192

(D.C. No. 06-CR-20066-JWL)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

*

Before HENRY, O’BRIEN, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Defendant James McKeighan seeks to appeal adverse rulings of the

magistrate judge on his motions to reconsider the imposition of pretrial detention

or, alternatively, to modify the conditions of his pretrial detention. By order

entered August 28, 2007, we directed defendant to show cause why this appeal

should not be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction because the rulings he
-2-

seeks to appeal are not final and appealable orders. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c)

(providing that appeal from decision denying revocation or amendment of

detention order is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1291); United States v. Harrison,

396 F.3d 1280, 1281 (2d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal from

magistrate judge’s detention order for lack of jurisdiction). Neither defendant nor

his counsel has responded to the order to show cause.

We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and it must be

dismissed. Defendant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. As a preliminary

matter, we appoint him for these proceedings under the Criminal Justice Act,

18 U.S.C. § 3006A, and direct the Clerk to forward to him the necessary voucher

materials. Because we are dismissing this appeal, however, counsel’s pending

motion to withdraw is DENIED as moot. The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Entered for the Court

PER CURIAM
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On October 10, 2023, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States of America*
                     v. 
                    *Dravo Corp., et al.,*
                     Civ. No. 8:01-cv-00500-JFB-TBT (D. Neb.). The proposed consent decree resolves claims against Desco Corporation pursuant to section 107(a) CERCLA for response costs incurred and to be incurred by EPA for Operable Unit 01 of the Hastings Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site and requires the Defendant to make a payment of $131,067 to EPA. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States of America*
                     v. 
                    *Dravo Corp., et al.,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-2-1260/10. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $3.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Patricia McKenna, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2023-22775 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. ( the ‘Company’) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (i)  | the accompanying report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December  31,  2006 (the ‘Report’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

|  |            |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii)  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                            |                                                                                     |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 27, 2007  | /s/ Angeliki Frangou    Angeliki FrangouChief Executive Officer |

----
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, I, Michael R.
Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(a) This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 4, 2006

                                        /s/ Michael R. Cunningham
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Michael R. Cunningham
                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. 62864.

#### P. John Hanrahan, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6578 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 57833.

protests 161602-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### S. H. Kress & Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer and celluloid sleds similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 374 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 374

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that Harriet Tubman should have 
been paid a pension for her service as a nurse and scout in the United 
                   States Army during the Civil War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2000

  Mr. Towns submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that Harriet Tubman should have 
been paid a pension for her service as a nurse and scout in the United 
                   States Army during the Civil War.

Whereas during the Civil War Harriet Tubman reported to General David Hunter at 
        Hilton Head, South Carolina, with a letter from Governor John Andrews of 
        Massachusetts allowing her to serve in the Union Army;
Whereas Harriet Tubman served at Hilton Head as a nurse, scout, spy, and cook;
Whereas in the spring of 1865, Harriet Tubman worked at the freedman's hospital 
        in Fortress Monroe, Virginia;
Whereas Harriet Tubman's last husband, Nelson Davis, served in the United States 
        Colored Infantry under Captain James S. Thompson, beginning on September 
        25, 1863, and was discharged on November 10, 1865;
Whereas Harriet Tubman received a pension as the spouse of a deceased veteran;
Whereas Harriet Tubman requested a pension for her own service in the Union Army 
        during the Civil War, but never received one;
Whereas a bill that passed the House of Representatives in 1897 during the 55th 
        Congress (H.R. 4982) would have required that Harriet Tubman be placed 
        on the pension roll of the United States for her service as a nurse in 
        the United States Army and paid a pension at the rate of $25 each month 
        instead of all other pensions;
Whereas some females who served in the military during the Civil War received a 
        pension for their service, including Sarah Emma Edmonds Seelye and 
        Albert Cashier, each of whom posed as a male; and
Whereas Harriet Tubman died of pneumonia on March 10, 1913, and was buried at 
        Fort Hill Cemetery in Auburn, New York, with military honors: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) the Congress recognizes that Harriet Tubman served as a 
        nurse and scout in the United States Army during the Civil War; 
        and
            (2) it is the sense of the Congress that Harriet Tubman 
        should have been paid a pension at the rate of $25 each month 
        for her service in the United States Army.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 105/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.105.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 105 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 545 April 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.105.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 105

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 545 April 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 105/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2011/C 105/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 105/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2011/C 105/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 105/03 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 105/03

Euro exchange rates

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 105/04 | Communication | 7 |
| 2011/C 105/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6178 — Arkema/Total's resin division) (1) | 8 |
| 2011/C 105/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6122 — Orizonia/BCD Travel/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |
| 2011/C 105/07 | Communication | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2011/C 105/04

Communication

7

2011/C 105/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6178 — Arkema/Total's resin division) (1)

8

2011/C 105/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6122 — Orizonia/BCD Travel/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

2011/C 105/07

Communication

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN