alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 35 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 1999

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the State of Qatar and its citizens for their commitment 
 to democratic ideals and women's suffrage on the occasion of Qatar's 
  historic elections of a central municipal council on March 8, 1999.

Whereas His Highness, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, the Emir of Qatar, 
        issued a decree creating a central municipal council, the first of its 
        kind in Qatar;
Whereas on March 8, 1999, the people of the State of Qatar held direct elections 
        for a central municipal council;
Whereas the central municipal council has been structured to have members from 
        29 election districts serving 4-year terms;
Whereas Qatari women were granted the right to participate in this historic 
        first municipal election, both as candidates and voters;
Whereas this election demonstrates the strength and diversity of the State of 
        Qatar's commitment to democratic expression;
Whereas the United States highly values democracy and women's rights;
Whereas March 8 is recognized as International Women's Day, and is an occasion 
        to assess the progress of the advancement of women and girls throughout 
        the world; and
Whereas this historic event of democratic elections and women's suffrage in the 
        State of Qatar should be honored: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) commends His Highness, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-
        Thani, the Emir of Qatar, for his leadership and commitment to 
        suffrage and the principles of democracy;
            (2) congratulates the citizens of the State of Qatar as 
        they celebrate the historic election for a central municipal 
        council; and
            (3) reaffirms that the United States is strongly committed 
        to encouraging the suffrage of women, democratic ideals, and 
        peaceful development throughout the Middle East.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
(the “Report”) of Green Stream Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2022, the undersigned
James C. DiPrima, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: October 31, 2022 | /s/ __James C. DiPrima_________________________                                         
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Name: James C. DiPrima
Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director
|                        | (Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)
Before The Second Division,

January 28, 1954

No. 57813.

protests 177564-K, etc. (New York).

#### Mohawk Iron & Steel Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum rods similar in all material respects to those the subject *of Mohawk Iron & Steel Co.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 274, C. D. 1533), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62368.

#### C. S. Emery & Company *v.*United States,

protests 316340-K, etc. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

On December 19, 1957, there was issued T. D. 54506, effective March 20, 1958, wherein the Bureau of Customs held that such merchandise as is now before the court, which had been previously classified as waste, not specially provided for, should be classified under paragraph 1105, by similitude to card waste, not carbonized, at 9 cents per pound. At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of T. D. 54506, and that it was properly dutiable, as claimed. Since the entries herein covered the period from January 3, 1957, through and including June 17, 1957. and upon the agreed facts of record, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### Geologic map of the Proterozoic rocks of the central Front Range, Colorado

By: Dolores J. Gable

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/i2605

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area
Docket No: FAA-2015-1275 Dir ID: 2014-NM-070-AD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TREADCO,
INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000876948
<NAME> TREADCO, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,224,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,330,951
<INVENTORY>                                 29,077,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,187,069
<PP&E>                                      43,890,979
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,122,056
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,293,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,671,004
<BONDS>                                     15,977,964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,723
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,525,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               108,293,690
<SALES>                                    108,369,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       78,717,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              111,992,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,048,041
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             613,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,108,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,182,122)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,925,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,925,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        








<PAGE>

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

March 6, 1958

No. 61640.

#### Frank M. Modica, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 160017-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of condimento similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Paolo Alonge, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 cust. Ct. 351, C. D. 1886), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Technology Solutions Company.
 Date: November 14, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ SANDOR GROSZSandor GroszChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73020-73021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 5 U.S.C. Section1009(d), notice is hereby given 
of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

[[Page 73021]]

    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--CE24-011, Grants to Support New 
Investigators in Conducting Research Related to Understanding Drug Use 
and Overdose Risk and Protective Factors (K01).
    Date: March 5, 2024.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., EST.
    Place: Web Conference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Aisha L. Wilkes, M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and 
Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford 
Highway NE, Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (404) 
639-6473; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e8a9bf8184838d9ba88b8c8bc68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d79680bebbbcb2a497b4b3b4f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-23457 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 50784.

#### Protests 56706-K, etc., of A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon Were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                  HOLOPAK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED               NINE MONTHS ENDED 
                                                  DECEMBER 31,                    DECEMBER 31,
                                             1996             1995             1996          1995
                                           ---------       ---------       ---------       ---------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>      
Weighted Average Number of       
     Common  Shares Outstanding            3,347,689       3,424,771       3,347,689       3,486,803

Common Share Equivalents Based          
     Upon the Treasury Stock Method              ---             ---          14,201          73,167

Common Share Equivalents Based        
     Upon the Modified Treasury      
     Stock Method                                ---             ---             ---             ---
                                           ---------       ---------       ---------       ---------
Total Common Shares and       
     Common  Share Equivalents       
     Outstanding                           3,347,689       3,424,771       3,361,890       3,559,970
                                           ---------       ---------       ---------       ---------

Earnings Per Common Share and      
     Common Share Equivalents:

Continuing Operations                          (0.03)           0.01             0.03           0.16
Discontinued Operations                          ---           (0.06)           (0.05)         (0.05)

Net Income                                    ($0.03)         ($0.05)          ($0.02)    $     0.11
                                           =========       =========       =========       =========

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10853)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 892453-1/2.

(Decided November 17, 1964)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by *the*undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. (That the subject merchandise consists of bardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 T.D. 197, T.D. 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.O., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> *4798. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
## ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 05-13-01661-CR OFFENSE: 19.02 Julio CesarVillalba v. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Dallas

# 535-/5

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 204th Judicial District Court 

### DATE:03/31/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-1258991-Q



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Julio CesarVillalba v. The State of STYLE: Texas 

# CCA#: S30*/d APP£LLANT>S Petition CCA Disposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: 

# f~tfus&c/ JUDGE: 

## DATE: 3Vw Z1. <2£/£~ JUDGE: r^ SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD
SCPW-20-0000699

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, J., and

Circuit Judge Ashford, assigned by reason of vacancy,

with Wilson, J., dissenting, with whom McKenna, J., joins)

Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Slavick’s

petition for writ of mandamus, filed on November 6, 2020, the

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and

the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that

he has a clear and indisputable right to relief and that he lacks

alternative means to seek relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not

entitled to the requested extraordinary writ. See Kema v.

Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of

mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless

the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000699

04-DEC-2020

03:22 PM

Dkt. 8 ODDP
relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the

alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus

without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 4, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ James H. Ashford

DISSENT

I dissent in that I would require an answer pursuant to

Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 21(c). 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Case No. 9,612.

#### In re MILLS.

[17 N. B. R. 472.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

April 6, 1878.

Bankruptcy — Receiver op Creditor — Right to Prove Debt — Deposition.

A receiver of the property of a creditor of the bankrupt is an assignee of the debt due to such creditor and may prove it in the bankruptcy proceedings; but the proof must be supported by the deposition required by general order No. 34. The deposition may. in the first instance, bo ox liarte, as in form No. 22.

Hearing upon petition for re-examination of proof of B. Reilly, receiver. The assignee claims the examination of the original creditor. The receiver declares himself ready to submit to an examination. The assignee contends that the original creditor is the person to whom the bankrupt [William Mills] owed the debt at the time of the adjudication. The assignee claims, secondly, that the proof should be supported by the deposition of the original creditor under rule 34. The receiver holds that the claim, having been transferred to him by operation of law, is not within rule 34. The assignee also contends that Reilly, receiver, is not entitled by law to prove the debt in this bankruptcy. It is admitted that the original claimant resides in England. The assignee moves to expunge the claim. The register asks if there is any objection to his making such order as he may see fit in the mnt.er. Mr. Whitney declines to answer, upon the ground that the register has no authority to require an issue till he decides the claim should be expunged, and that the question of the register is not pertinent until his ruling is made. The assignee objects to the register making any order except to expunge or diminish the claim. The register says he will reserve his decision.

By J. W. LITTLE, Register:

I think, in the re-examination of the claim filed by Reilly, receiver, in the above matter, that the motion that I should require the original claimant to present himself for examination or cross-examination by the assignee should be denied. And, further, I do not think this is a case where a deposition should be required by owner of claim at time of commencement of proceedings, according to G. O. No. 34.

W. F. Scott, for assignee.

Mr. Whitney, for receiver.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

BLATCHFORD, Circuit Judge.

I think that Reilly, as receiver, is an assignee of the debt, and as such assignee may prove it. But, as it was assigned before proof, the proof must, and to make it receivable at all, be supported by the deposition required in general order No. 34. The deposition may in the first instance be ex parte, as in form No. 22. The proof was irregular because not supported by such deposition, and should on that ground be expunged.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
 DATE:  December 12, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Byron L. BergrenByron L. BergrenPresident and Chief
Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Keith E. PlowmanKeith E. PlowmanExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
No. R66/54.

#### William R. Neal *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/16448, etc. (Port Huron).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those in *United States*v. *Acme Steel Company*(51 CCPA 81, C.A.D. 841), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper statutory basis for the determination of the value of the steel strap in issue and that such value is the invoiced unit price.