alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

June 29, 1951

No. 55731.

protest 166673-K (New York).

#### Wing Fat Co. *v.*United States,

Cline, Judge:

This is a protest, arising at the port of New York, against the collector’s assessment of duty on certain vegetables imported from China on or about August 21, 1948, at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as vegetables, prepared or preserved, salted. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable at *17%*per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775, as modified by T. D. 51909.

Counsel have submitted this case on a stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked A and cheeked FHL (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner F. H. *274Lewis (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by- the above-entitled protest, assessed with duty at 35% ad valorem under Paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, consist of vegetables prepared or preserved and not specially provided for and not pickled or packed in salt or brine.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the above-entitled protest be submitted on this stipulation, protest being limited to the items marked A as aforesaid.

Plaintiff waives the right to first docket call and further amendment of this’ protest.

Paragraph-775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D.-51802, contains the following: •

> Vegetables (including horseradish), if cut,, sliced,, or otherwise reduced in size, or if reduced to flour, or if parched or roasted, or packed in oil, or prepared or preserved in any other way (except if pickled or packed in salt or brine) and not specially provided for_1_17)4% ad val.

, • Said provision went into effect on May 22, 1948, pursuant to the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T. D. 51909.

Since the merchandise herein was imported during the effective period of T. D. 51909, and in view of the above stipulation, we hold that the merchandise represented by the items marked with the letter “A” on the invoice and with the initials Of the examiner is dutiable at 17J4 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802 and T. D. 51909.

The protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Page 1 of 2

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

DIVISION OF SUPERVISION

AND REGULATION

SR 19-13

November 15, 2019

Revised December 12, 2019

Note: On December 12, 2019, the HTML version of this letter was revised to reflect a corrected 

applicability amount. The correct applicability amount is $10 billion and not $1 billion.

TO: THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE 

BANK AND TO INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE

SUBJECT: FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook

Applicability: This letter applies to all institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, including 

those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) has revised the 

February 2015 version of the “Business Continuity Management” (BCM) booklet of the 

FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook (IT Handbook). The BCM booklet 

is one of 11 booklets that make up the IT Handbook. 

This booklet discusses BCM governance and its related components, including 

resilience; strategies, and plan development; training and awareness; exercises and tests; 

maintenance and improvement; and reporting for the board of directors. Additionally, this 

booklet outlines the principles of BCM to help examiners determine whether management 

adequately manages risk related to the availability of critical financial products and services.

The booklet includes examination procedures, addressing:

• BCM concepts as part of information security.

• Various management-related concepts from other booklets of the IT Handbook.

• Elements related to BCM such as the identification of critical business 

functions, interdependency issues, and training programs.

The BCM booklet and the other booklets in the IT Handbook are available

on the FFIEC website at: http://ithandbook.ffiec.gov/it-booklets.aspx.
 

Page 2 of 2

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this SR letter to the Federal Reservesupervised institutions in their districts, as well as to their supervisory and 

examination staff. Questions regarding the revised guidance should be addressed 

to the staff in the Board’s Systems and Operational Resiliency Policy section. In 

addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s public website.1

Michael S. Gibson

Director

Supersedes:

• SR letter 16-14, “FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook – Information 

Security Booklet”

 1 http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx
No. 60653.

#### Walco Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 280964-K, 281860-K, and 283008-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chalkwhite stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59105, except that said stones are not faceted, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, William Y. Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                      
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 13, 2005 |  | /s/ WILLIAM Y. TAUSCHER                              
|                       |  | William Y. Tauscher                                  
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 336 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 336

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 336

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 
25, 2000, or Friday, May 26, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 6, 2000, for morning-hour 
debate, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Thursday, May 25, 2000, Friday, May 26, 
2000, Saturday, May 27, 2000, or Sunday, May 28, 2000, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 
June 5, 2000, or Tuesday, June 6, 2000, as may be specified by its 
Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
at such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority 
Leader or his designee in the motion, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Louis J. Brothers, Chief Executive Officer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: April 15, 2011

By:  /s/ Louis J. Brothers

Louis J. Brothers

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief 

Financial  Officer, and Chairman of the Board

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The information contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 14, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 14, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0082. P&J BEVERAGE CORPORATION d/b/a FORREST ROAD PACKAGE STORE v. THE BOTTLE SHOP, LLC. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SC19CV39
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
PeopleSoft, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based
on his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.                                  

Dated: May 14, 2003

/s/ CRAIG A. CONWAY

Craig A. Conway
President and Chief Executive Officer
PeopleSoft, Inc.

/s/ KEVIN T. PARKER

Kevin T. Parker
Executive Vice President,
Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer
PeopleSoft, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bradley W. Evans,
Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 12, 2008                         /s/ Bradley W. Evans
                                           --------------------
                                            Bradley W. Evans
                                            Interim Chief Executive Officer
                                            Interim Principal Executive Officer
No. 61639.

#### Air Clearance Assn., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 301958-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J'.

The protests were dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8)
pertaining to the 2005 Management Omnibus Incentive Plan of TAL International
Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 1, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of TAL International Group, Inc.
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of TAL
International Group, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.  /s/  Ernst &Young
  LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 1, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DARREN OLIVER ROBINSON, a/k/a Stretch, a/k/a

Desaun Talib Bethel,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CR-04-52)

Submitted: July 13, 2005 Decided: July 28, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacqueline Ann Hallinan, HALLINAN LAW OFFICES, PLLC, Charleston,

West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Edward Johnston, United

States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Thomas Oliver Mucklow,

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(2) (providing that intermediate

Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays are excluded when period is

less than eleven days). 

2

The notice of appeal was date stamped and entered by the

district court on April 6, 2005, but the notice also contained a

second date stamp reflecting a date of April 4, 2005, thereby

suggesting Robinson had delivered it to prison officials for

mailing prior to the expiration of the thirty-day excusable neglect

period.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Darren Oliver Robinson seeks to appeal his conviction for

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and his 202-

month sentence of imprisonment. In criminal cases, the defendant

must file an appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment or the

notice of appeal by the government. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A).

When a notice of appeal is filed within thirty days of the

expiration of the appeal period, the district court may grant an

extension, with or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable

neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v.

Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 352-53 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered its judgment on February 16,

2005. Under Rule 4(b)(1)(A), Robinson had ten days, or until

March 3, 2005, to file a notice of appeal.1 Under Houston v. Lack,

487 U.S. 266 (1988), the notice of appeal was filed on April 4,

2005, which was after the ten-day period expired but within the

thirty-day excusable neglect period.2 Because the notice of appeal

was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case
- 3 -

to the district court for the court to determine whether Robinson

has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension

of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will

then be returned to this court for further consideration. We also

defer ruling on the United States’ motion to dismiss the appeal

pending the district court’s determination. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

REMANDED
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Jonathan Kalman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Jonathan Kalman
            
            Dated:
                June 27, 2008Jonathan
                Kalman
              Chief
                Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.3.1

AMENDMENT TO THE  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH RANDEL G. OWEN

WHEREAS, Emergency Medical Services L.P. ("Company") and Randel G. Owen ("Executive") entered into an Employment Agreement
("Agreement") on February 10, 2005, as amended; and

WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect compliance with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended effective January 1, 2009 as follows:

1.     The
third sentence of Section 7.B is deleted and replaced with the following:



2.     Section 8.B.2
is deleted and replaced with the following:



3.     The
following language is added to the end of Section 8.B.3:



---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Executive have executed this Agreement, in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, this 30th day of December, 2008 and effective
January 1, 2009.

COMPANY

ATTEST:By:

/s/ William A. Sanger

By:Its:

Chairman and CEO

Its:




EXECUTIVE/s/ Randel G. OwenPrint:

Randel G. Owen


---



QuickLinks
No. 53846.

#### Wm. M. Allison & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 119885-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc.*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 391), the protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73415-73418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 73416]]

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable 
legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property 
subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. 
persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with 
them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, 
tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-
622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; 
Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the 
Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-
622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    On July 31, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN25OC23.001


[[Page 73417]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN25OC23.002




[[Page 73418]]


    Dated: October 20, 2023.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-23566 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
No. 55062.

#### Chase National Bank *v.*United States,

protest 677940-G (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consist's of dogskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *S. M. Brachman & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 29, 2007

Mr. Armando Ramos Sr.

Coffield Unit #544522

Route #1, PO Box 150

Tennessee Colony, TX 75884

Mr. Roger A. Berger

Uzick Oncken Scheuerman & Berger

238 Westcott

Houston, TX 77007

Mr. Mark Ralls

Gonzales Hoblit Ferguson, L.L.P.

700 N. Saint Mary's St., Ste 1800

San Antonio, TX 78205

RE:Case Number:  06-0336

Court of Appeals Number:  13-05-00204-CV&13-05-00205-CV

Trial Court Number:  2005-02-1104-G

Style:ARMANDO RAMOS, SR., ET AL.

v.

DR. IAN RICHARDSON & VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals’ judgment and renders judgment.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0336Page 2**