alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                             TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS COMPANY

                              STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION
                                OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In thousands, except earnings per share)


                                                                For the
                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                             August 31,   (A)
                                                           -------------------
                                                            1997         1996
                                                            ----         ----
                                                              (unaudited)

Net income per statements of income. . . . . . .        $  3,959     $  2,125

Earnings resulting from modified treasury
  stock method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           --              35
                                                        --------     --------
    Net earnings per modified treasury
       stock method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $  3,959     $  2,160
                                                        --------     --------
                                                        --------     --------

Shares:

    Weighted average shares outstanding. . . . .          25,181       22,572
    Common stock equivalents . . . . . . . . . .           2,795        3,228
                                                        --------     --------

    Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          27,976       25,800
                                                        --------     --------
                                                        --------     --------
  Earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $   0.14     $   0.09
                                                        --------     --------
                                                        --------     --------


(A) Share data and per share data have been restated to reflect the
    three-for-two stock splits that were effective on August 1, 1997 and July
    30, 1996, respectively.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       PAGE 17
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders

and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions

of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 2/20/96TENTH CIRCUIT

 

BRADEN SPILMAN, )

)

 Plaintiff-Appellant, )

)

 v. ) No. 95-1398

) (D.C. No. 95-S-1513)

WARDEN DIESSLIN, and JOHN and JANE DOES, ) (Dist. Colo.)

)

 Defendants-Appellees. )

)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff, Braden Spilman, a federal prisoner, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

against the warden and correctional officers of Buena Vista Correctional Facility for

money damages, alleging violation of his constitutional rights under the Fourth, Eighth,

and Fourteenth Amendments. Spilman was moved to a different correctional facility with

a higher security level and the officers packed his belongings for shipment to Spilman's

family. Spilman alleged his family did not receive certain of his belongings, and sought
2

actual damages, punitive damages, and the costs of the action. The district court

dismissed the action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), finding no basis for the legal

claims made, and further finding the named defendants were not proper defendants to

respond to the claims asserted by Spilman under § 1983.

Spilman contends his property was improperly seized, destroyed, or lost, and he

has no adequate means of redress. We have reviewed Spilman's brief, the pleadings, and

the district court's order, and have carefully examined the entire record on appeal. Based

upon our review of the record, we find no reversible error, and affirm the dismissal of the

action for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court's order.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge
Douglas 

4•S 

Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Petitioners bear the burden of 

demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth 

Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). 

Having considered the parties' arguments and the documents 

before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ 

relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith, 107 Nev. at 

677, 818 P.2d at 851; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. In particular, 

NRS 432B.330(2)(c) provides that a child may be in need of protection if 

the person responsible for the child's welfare caused the abuse or neglect 

of another child who resided with that person. Here, the district court 

concluded that petitioners failed to establish that B.L. was a child in need 

of protection from real parties in interest, and petitioners have not met 

their burden of showing that the district court's decision constituted an 

arbitrary or capricious abuse of discretion or was in excess of the court's 

jurisdiction. Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

, J• 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Special Public Defender 

Stephanie M. Keels 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 0
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 198

EX PA R TE JO H N W ESL EY W A LSH , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 1 4 , 9 7 1 - A I N T HE 1 1 5 TH DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM UPS HU R CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Young , 4 1 8 S
. W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of burg lary of a habitationand sente nced to imprisonment for life. Ap pli c ant c on te nd s th a t his c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e becau se he fa ile d to tim e ly fi le a no tic e of a

pp e a l. Spe c if

ic a lly , he c la ims tha

t hi s atto rn e y

fa ile d to pr e se rv e his a

pp e llate deadlines by

filing his motion for new trial afte r the time for

said filing ha d expired.2

Ba sed on an aff

idavit f rom Applicant’s trial counsel that he miscalc ulated the da y s for filing
a mot ion fo r n e w tri a l and

ba se d o n th e State ’s re sp on se ind ic a tin g its be lie f that App lic ant w a s, in fa c t, de nie d h is r ig ht t o f

ile an a pp e a l ba se d o n c ouns e l’ s mi sc a lc ulatio n, We f ind that App lic a nt i s entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the j udg ment of convic tion in C ause N o. 14,971-A from the 115th J udicial District Court of Upshur County
. Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of a ppeal so th at h e m ay t h en, with t he aid of counsel, obtain a

meaning ful appe al. All time limi ts shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had be en imposed on the date on w hich the mandate of this Court issues. W e hold that, should Applicant desire to pr osecute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the tr ia l c ourt wi thi n 3 0 d ay s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: Aug ust 19, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
No. 55739.

protests 149129-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### H. R. Lockwood *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before Chief Judge Rao,

March 29, 1967

No. R67/67.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R61/10070 (Tampa).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the galvanized wire and round steel wire in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f.o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.
No. P67/404.

No. P67/405.

#### Charles A. Koons, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 58/15892-15338 (New Orleans). Dalminter, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 59/32157 and 61/22928 (Los Angeles).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consist of seamless steel tubes with plain square-cut ends made to American Petroleum Institute specifications for grade J-55 steel to be made into couplings for oil well casing the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John A. Steer*Co., *a/c Charles A.*Koons, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 CCPA 81, C.A.D. 911), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIGITRAN
SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED JULY 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          66,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  447,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,000
<INVENTORY>                                    279,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               897,000
<PP&E>                                       1,377,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 561,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,863,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,171,000
<BONDS>                                        749,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                       106,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (109,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,170,000
<SALES>                                        818,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               829,000
<CGS>                                          475,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  900,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (294,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (294,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (294,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Steve Altomare Quality Aerial Photography LLC

38317 Welsh Drive Prairieville, Louisiana 70769

July 10, 2015

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Quality Aerial Photography LLC requesting exemptions and relief from the requirements 

of sections 14CFR: 61.113(a) &(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1)

&(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). The exemptions pertain to commercial use and operation 

of two DJI Inspire I Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in accordance with the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 / FAA Section 333 Exemption.

Reason for seeking exemption:

- Use of UAS for commercial applications.

- Conduct business legally.

- Be in compliance with all FAA regulations and stipulations when flying our UAS.

Request for exemption(s) relating to the public benefit as a whole:

UAS video/photography of real estate (commercial, residential and industrial), land 

surveys, land surveillance, industrial and commercial inspections, sporting events and 

special events over certain areas of these United States would be performed safely, 

legally and economically. Accordingly, minimal impacts on the environment and a safer 

more economical avenue for businesses and individuals in need of these services can be 

achieved.

Summary

Quality Aerial Photography LLC, pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012:

- Petitioning for exemption of sections 14CFR: 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2) and 91.417(a) & (b).

- Seek exemption(s) for commercial use of our two DJI Inspire UAS.

Respectively submitted,

Steve Altomare

Quality Aerial Photography LLC
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 300

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and commending our Nation’s Federal

workforce for successfully preparing our Nationto withstand any catastrophic Year 2000 computer problem disruptions.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 300

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Year 2000 computer problem (Y2K) created the

potential of a catastrophic international problem, causing

some computer systems and other electronic devices to

erroneously misinterpret the ‘‘00’’ in the year as 1900,

rather than 2000;

Whereas the American people expected and deserved reliable

service from their Federal Government to ensure that
2

•HCON 300 EH

critical Federal functions dependent on electronic systems

would be performed accurately and in a timely manner;

Whereas, after the initial series of congressional Y2K hearings in the spring of 1996, it became clear that unless

appropriate action was taken, the Y2K problem could

cause severe consequences on the successful operation of

Federal systems;

Whereas Federal agencies and their employees subsequently

made significant progress in meeting the challenges posed

by the Y2K computer problem;

Whereas minimizing the Y2K problem required a major technological and managerial effort and it was critical that

the Federal workforce rise to address this challenge;

Whereas the continued uninterrupted operation of our Nation’s Federal systems was due to the comprehensive efforts made by those dedicated, talented, and committed

Federal workers who served ably in the front lines of this

epic battle in vanquishing the millennium bug;

Whereas the Federal workforce identified and worked to resolve the Y2K problem, giving countless hours and their

holidays to assure the American people that major Y2K

breakdowns in key infrastructures were unlikely;

Whereas the level of Y2K effort was justified and the threat

was very real, and the risks and consequences of inaction

were too dire to justify a lesser Federal effort;

Whereas preparation for Y2K led to an unprecedented level

of effort that not only improved system inventories and

network reliability, but has also accelerated electronic

business and international cooperation;

Whereas the efforts of the Federal workforce to solve the

Y2K problem provided an important example of the Gov-
3

•HCON 300 EH

ernment’s ability to respond to future difficult technological and management challenges; and

Whereas the level of Y2K success in the United States, which

has over one-fourth of the world’s computer assets and

is the most technologically dependent nation in the world,

was quite remarkable, and was led by our Federal efforts:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes and commends the

3 meritorious service of our Nation’s Federal workforce, and

4 all those who assisted in the efforts to successfully address

5 the Year 2000 computer challenge.

Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
February 18, 2021

Ross Oklewicz, Esq.

Associate Counsel

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Boulevard 

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

Dear Mr. Oklewicz:

Acting under authority delegated by the Board,1 I have determined not to 

disapprove the notice filed under the Change in Bank Control Act (“CIBC Act”) 

(12 U.S.C. § 1817(j)) by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“VGI”), Malvern, 

Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and the investment 

companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other pooled 

investment vehicles, and institutional accounts that are sponsored, managed, or 

advised by VGI (collectively, “Notificants”), to acquire aggregate control of 

15 percent or more of Northern Trust Corporation, parent of The Northern Trust 

Company, both of Chicago, Illinois. In taking this action, I have considered the 

notice in light of the relevant statutory factors under the CIBC Act.

This determination is based on the specific facts and representations 

provided to the Board by Notificants. Any material change in those facts and 

representations could result in a different conclusion and should be immediately 

reported to staff at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (“Reserve Bank”). This 

action is specifically conditioned on compliance with all the commitments made to 

the Board related to this notice.

2

 For purposes of this action, the commitments are 

deemed to be conditions imposed in writing by the Board in connection with the 

 1

 12 CFR 265.5(c)(2).

2

 See Letter from Mark Van Der Weide to Anne Robinson (November 26, 2019), 

available at 

https://www.federalreserve.gov/supervisionreg/legalinterpretations/bhcchangeinco

ntrol20191126a.pdf.
2

findings and decision herein and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under 

applicable law. 

The CIBC Act requires that each insured bank or bank holding company 

promptly report to the appropriate federal banking agency any change or 

replacement of its chief executive officer or any of its directors that occurs within 

the 12 months following any change in control and that it provide a statement of 

the past and current business and professional affiliations of the new chief 

executive officer or directors. We would appreciate Notificants’ cooperation in 

ensuring that, if any such changes occur, the required information be submitted to 

the Reserve Bank.

Very truly yours,

 

Margaret McCloskey Shanks

Deputy Secretary of the Board

cc: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James B. Hawkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. HawkinsPrint Name: James B. Hawkins Title: President and
Chief Executive Officer Date: May 7, 2009


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Murphy, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Steven J. MurphyPrint Name: Steven J. Murphy Title: Vice President
Finance and Chief Financial Officer Date: May 7, 2009
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1439

VIVEK PISAL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. K12, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Rossie David Alston , Jr., District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00506

- RDA

- JFA )

Submitted : August 18, 2022 Decided: August 22, 2022

Before WYNN , THACKER , and HEYTENS , Circuit Judge s
.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Vivek Pisal, Appellant Pro Se. Crystal L. Tyler, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1439 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CUR IAM:
Vivek Pisal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 , 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 , as untimely

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affi rm the district court’s judgment. Pisal v. K12, Inc. , No. 1:21

- cv - 00506

- RDA

- JFA (E.D. Va.
Mar. 23, 2022) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1439 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2