alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         723,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,584,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (109,206)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,416,156
<PP&E>                                       4,174,357
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,730,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,575,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,223,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,068
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,515,076)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,575,510
<SALES>                                     47,658,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,658,983
<CGS>                                       40,718,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,718,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,218,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (109,206)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             313,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,543,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,553,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,553,468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.89)


</TABLE>
May 1, 1956

No. 59896.—Suit 4853.

#### Concord Watch Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1700 affirmed January 20,1956. C. A. D. 606.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 278 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 278

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 19th annual National 
                   Peace Officers' Memorial Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2000

Mr. Traficant submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 19th annual National 
                   Peace Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall be 
permitted to sponsor a public event, the 19th annual National Peace 
Officers' Memorial Service, on the Capitol Grounds on May 15, 2000, or 
on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly 
designate, in order to honor the more than 130 law enforcement officers 
who died in the line of duty during 1999.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event authorized by section 1 shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The National Fraternal Order of 
Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all 
expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the 
event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the National Fraternal Order of Police and 
its auxiliary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such 
stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event authorized by section 1.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event authorized 
by section 1.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.

 

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation       General Partner

 

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and         Principal Financial Officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.

Date: August 11, 2003
Case No. 10,323.

#### NORTHERN SHORE STATEN ISLAND FERRY CO. v. The HUGUENOTS. 1

District Court. D. New York.

June 19, 1862.

Collision — Steamehs Approaching Wharf. ‘In admiralty.

[For hearing on exceptions to commissioner’s report, see Case No. 10,330.]

Clark & Hale, for libelants.

Mr. AYilliams, for claimants.

1

 [Not previously reported.]

SHIPMAN, District Judge.

The libelants are owners of the steamboat Thomas Hunt, running form New York to Staten Island. The Huguenots is owned by a rival company, and runs on the same route. The suit is brought to recover damages for a collision which occurred at the landing in the village of Factoryville, where both boats touch, and took place June 10, 1801. The boats approached the dock from opposite courses. The wharf was long enough for both boats to have landed at the same time with ease and safety. They reached the dock both at about the same time, the Hunt perhaps a little the first. The Huguenots approached under too great headway, which ought to have been sooner checked, as it might have been without any difficulty whatever. The consequence was she passed the point of the dock where it was her duty to have stopped, and struck the Hunt on her bow, doing the latter some damage. There was no excuse for this, and she is therefore adjudged in fault, and must be held responsible.

Decree for libelants, with an order of reference.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49555-49556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19900]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8837]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Hidden Treasures of Rome in the United States''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Hidden Treasures of Rome in the United 
States,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Museum of Art and Archaeology, University of Missouri, Columbia, 
Missouri, from on or about January 1, 2015, until on or about August 1, 
2016, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

[[Page 49556]]

    Dated: August 14, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-19900 Filed 8-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 302

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 23, 2000

Received; and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling on the people of the United States to observe a

National Moment of Remembrance to honor the men

and women of the United States who died in the pursuit

of freedom and peace.

Whereas the preservation of basic freedoms and world peace

has always been a valued objective of this nation;

Whereas thousands of American men and women have selflessly given their lives in service as peacemakers and

peacekeepers;
2

HCON 302 RFS

Whereas greater strides should be made to demonstrate appreciation for these loyal Americans and the ultimate sacrifice they each made;

Whereas Memorial Day is an appropriate day to remember

American heroes by inviting the people of the United

States to honor these heroes at a designated time;

Whereas Memorial Day needs to be made relevant to both

present and future generations of Americans; and

Whereas a National Moment of Remembrance each Memorial

Day at 3:00 p.m., local time, would provide the people of

the United States an opportunity to participate in a symbolic act of American unity: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) calls on the people of the United States to

4 observe a National Moment of Remembrance to

5 honor the men and women of the United States who

6 died in the pursuit of freedom and peace; and

7 (2) requests that the President issue a procla8 mation calling on the people of the United States to

9 observe such a National Moment of Remembrance.

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 28, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/ Kenneth R. Hanks   
|                     |  |  |  | Kenneth R. Hanks       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is
being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after
the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



76
Order entered January 11, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01045-CR

DERRICK WALTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-41375

ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief is 

GRANTED, and we ORDER the brief filed on or before JANUARY 17, 2023.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 10G


                Amendment to Outside Directors Stock Bonus Plan

                Excerpt from Minutes of Board of Directors Meeting
                             held November 8, 2002


     RESOLVED, that 50,000 shares be reserved for issuance pursuant to the
Outside Directors Stock Bonus Plan and that the officers of the Corporation be
and hereby are authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary to
effectuate the intent of this resolution.
No. 57114.

petition 6869-R (New York).

#### Charles B. Chrystal Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It appeared from the record that the petitioner had been importing talc and entered it at the same price for some time prior to the importation here involved and that this was the first time that the value had been questioned by the customs officials. When petitioner was advised that the customs officials were questioning the value at which entry had been made, it and other importers of the same merchandise arranged a conference with the customs officials. Not being able to agree upon a value at this conference, the customs officials requested a foreign investigation. At a later date, it was agreed that the entry herein would be selected for the purpose of a test case. However, when the war ended, it was discovered that all records of the exporting company had been destroyed, and the appeal for reappraisement was abandoned. From an examination of the record it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted. *Glendenning, McLeish & Co.*v. *United States,*13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 387, T. D. 41320; *Syndicate Trading Co.*v. *United States,*id. 409, T. D. 41339; and *United States*v. *Bracher & Co.,*id. 432, T. D. 41344, cited.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bradley W. Evans, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.











Date: August 13, 2009                                                                     For
/s/ Lee D. Thibert


Bradley W. Evans


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

December 26, 1947

No. 52080.

protests 494578-G, etc. (New York).

#### Van Raalte Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser*& *Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7428

PATRICK ELLIS COCHRAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:20-cv-00315-RGD-LRL)

Submitted: September 28, 2022 Decided: November 3, 2022

Before HARRIS and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Ellis Cochran, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7428 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Ellis Cochran seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cochran’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cochran has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7428 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 11110)

#### Triumph of Europe, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 525001, etc.

(Decided December 7, 1965)

*Barnes, Riehardson & Golburn*for the plaintiff.

*John*W. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, listed in schedule “A,” annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> (1) That the involved merchandise consists of undergarments exported from Bermuda and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165) ; that said merchandise is not identified on the Pinal List published by the Secretary of Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521), and that appraisement was accordingly made under section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by said Customs Simplification Act.

> (2) That on or about the dates of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely sold or offered for sale in the country of exportation for export to the United States; that on or about said dates of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely sold or offered for sale in the principal market of the United States for domestic consumption; that the merchandise was accordingly appraised under constructed value as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act.

> (3) That the constructed value as defined in section 402(d) of the involved merchandise is equal to the *per se*appraised unit values plus 5%, net packed.

> (4) That the appeals enumerated in Schedule “A” annexed may be submitted upon this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find and hold that the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from ware*707house for consumption on or after February 27, 1958; that the involved merchandise was not listed on the final list of articles published in T.D. 54521, effective February 27,1958; and that constructed value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas, Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and I find and hold that such statutory value is the *per se*appraised unit values, plus 5 percent, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.