alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Portfolios of Hypothetical Corporate Loans Data Definitions

Variable Mnemonic Description 

Committed exposure committed_exposure_amt Committed exposure in dollars

Utilized exposure utilized_exposure_amt Utilized exposure in dollars

Interest rate interest_rate Interest rate on credit facility

Remaining maturity term Remaining term of the loan in 

months

Origination year orig_year Year loan was originated

Facility type facility_type_cat The type of credit facility:

1 is revolving

7 is term loan

0 is other

Lien position lien_position_cat The type of lien:

1 is first-lien senior

2 is second-lien 

3 is senior unsecured

4 is contractually subordinated

Credit rating rating Credit rating of obligor. 

Categories include AAA, AA, A, 

BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C, and D

Domestic obligor domestic_flag Equal to 1 if obligor is domiciled 

in the United States

Industry naics_two_digit_cat Two-digit industry code based 

on 2007 NAICS definitions

Interest rate variability interest_rate_variability Interest rate type:

0 is fully undrawn (interest rate 

not provided)

1 is fixed

2 is floating

3 is mixed

Guarantor flag guarantor_flag Indicates the type of guarantee 

of the guarantor:

1 is full guarantee

2 is partial guarantee

3 is U.S. government agency 

guarantee

4 is no guarantee
No. 61667.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 271640-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lenses for photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, the merchandise in question is dutiable as photographic lenses, the claim of the plaintiff at 25 percent was sustained.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND COMMERCE

LESTER SPELL, JR., D.V.M. COMMISSIONER September 14, 201 I Mr. Mathy Stanislaus Assistant Administrator Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) USEPA Headquarters, Arid Rios Building 1 200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW Mail Code: 5101T Washington. DC 20460

Dear Mr. Stanislaus: The Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce respectfully requests an extension of the November 10. 2011, deadline fbr on-farm implementation of the Oil Spill Prevention. Control, and Countermeasures Program (SPCC). Historic flooding in Mississippi earlier this spring has prevented producers from implementing SPCC requirements as intended. Mississippi farmlands and communities were inundated with record rainfall and flood waters after the Mississippi River rose to historic levels during the spring of 201 1. The disaster conditions interrupted planting schedules and put great strains on farm budgets. As a result, farmers simply did not have the time or funds needed to adequately implement SPCC plans. When EPA updated the SPCC Farmers Fact Sheet in March and issued the SPCC Plan Template in April, weather conditions prevented farmers from conducting any SPCC site preparation or equipment installation. Once weather conditions improved sufficiently and tlood waters receded, there was not enough time left in the planting season for farmers to get crops planted and implement SPCC requirements. Professional engineers in Mississippi will also need additional time and education to adequately meet SPCC program requirements. Historically, engineers have done little work on farms and very few are familiar with the SPCC prograni. Currently. the vast majority of the State of Mississippi has received either a Presidential or Secretarial Disaster Declaration due to some form of natural disaster (flooding. tornados, or drought). United States Department of' Agriculture (USDA) officials indicate that it is highly likely that every county will receive some form of disaster declaration before year-end, especially due to the continuing drought conditions. If so, 201 I will be the second y ear in a row that Mississippi counties have received disaster declarations due to extreme weather conditions across the state. Mississippi producers are full y ' committed to correctly complying with SPCC regulations but need adequate time to do so. An additional 24 months to implement SPCC plans would provide producers sufficient time to recover financially from the impacts of the extreme weather conditions, find qualified engineers, and install the proper equipment. I would greatly appreciate your consideration of this request.

Lester Spell. Jr., D.V.M. Commissioner of' Agriculture and Commerce

P.O. BOX 1609 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39215-1609 • TELEPHONE (601) 359-1100 • FAX (601) 354-7710
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

IN RE: ADOPTION OF S.R., A MINOR 

CHILD 

PETITION OF: A.R., NATURAL FATHER 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 205 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 5th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-22-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-25-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          44,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,460
<INVENTORY>                                    434,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               588,592
<PP&E>                                         975,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                 379,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,240,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          369,052
<BONDS>                                        414,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           321
<OTHER-SE>                                     435,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,240,976
<SALES>                                      1,700,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,710,559
<CGS>                                        1,310,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,651,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

December 19, 1967

No. P67/435.

#### Border Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/4947, etc. (Seattle).

Watson, *J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of dado saws similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Border Brokerage Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 510, C.D. 2689), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. P68/86.

protest 64/20332 (San Francisco).

#### Mitsui & Co., Ltd. *v. United*States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of cotton velveteens similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Amity*Fabrics, *Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2416), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert I. Kriebel, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ ROBERT I. KRIEBEL                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 |   |
| Robert I. Kriebel   Principal Financial Officer |   |

August 5, 2004