alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.69
TO: Tim Busch

FR: Perry A. Sook

DA: August 14, 2002

RE: Addendum to Employment Agreement

Pursuant to our discussions regarding your increasing operational
responsibilities with the company, this memorandum will serve as an addendum to
your employment agreement with Nexstar Broadcasting, dated September 11, 2000.

Section 1. Position and Duties. Effective October 1, 2002 your position and
duties will be expanded to include operational oversight of the company's
television stations in the Erie, PA, Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, PA and Rochester, NY
markets, and other markets and duties as assigned by the Chief Executive
Officer. Your title will be changed to Senior Vice President and Regional
Manager.

Section 2. Term of Employment. The term of this agreement is hereby extended
through December 31, 2007.

Section 4. Compensation. Section 4(a), base salary is hereby amended as follows:
        Effective October 1, 2002                                     $195,000
        From October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004                    $205,000
        From October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2005                    $215,000
        From October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006                    $225,000
        Effective October 1, 2006 and thereafter                      $235,000

Section 4(b) is hereby amended to reflect annual bonus targets as follows:
        After the 2002 fiscal year:                                   $60,000.
        After the 2003 fiscal year:                                   $65,000.
        After the 2004 fiscal year:                                   $70,000.
        After the 2005 fiscal year                                    $75,000
        After the 2006 fiscal year and each subsequent year:          $80,000.

All other elements of your employment agreement with Nexstar Broadcasting will
remain in full force and effect.  Please indicate your agreement with and
acceptance of the terms of this addendum by signing below and sending one
original to my attention at the corporate office.

Sincerely,                                   Agreed and Accepted:

/s/ Perry A. Sook                            /s/ Tim Busch
-------------------------                    --------------------------
Perry A. Sook                                Tim Busch
President and Chief Executive Officer        Date:

                        Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc.

200 Abington Executive Park, Suite 201 Clarks Summit, PA 18411 (570)586-5400 fax
                                 (570) 586-8745
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        $386,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,932,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,542,240
<PP&E>                                      11,441,005
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,542,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,922,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,195,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,150
<COMMON>                                       103,865
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,611,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,922,894
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,198,641
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,746,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                315,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,986
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   305,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        




</TABLE>
No. 69385.

#### Morris Shoenthal, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 323556-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hats, bonnets, and hoods, in chief value of ramie, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Morris Shoenthal, Inc.*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2431), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNINGCORPORATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C §1350

 

I, Elizabeth A.Schroeder, the Chief Financial Officer of Tuesday Morning Corporation, herebycertify that:

 

1.                                     The quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofTuesday Morning Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                     The information contained in theabove-mentioned report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Tuesday Morning Corporation.

 
| Date:  November 1, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Elizabeth A.  Schroeder                      |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Elizabeth A.  Schroeder  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

----
No. 60318.

protest 171445-K (Los Angeles).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., and Peter Commercial Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated September 10,
2003 in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-108548)
and related Prospectus of Claymore Securities Defined Portfolios, Series 157.


                                        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                        ---------------------------
                                        GRANT THORNTON LLP


Chicago, Illinois
September 10, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Simon Pedder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation (the Evaluation Date); and

c. disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                   
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/    SIMON
PEDDER                               
|                    |  |     |  | Simon Pedder President and Chief Executive Officer
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 182

Outlining a vision to shape congressional information technology policy into

the next century to promote and preserve the successes, leadership,

and uniqueness of the United States information technology sector.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1999

Mr. DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. DREIER, Mr. GOODLATTE, Ms. DUNN,

Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. DOOLEY of California, Ms. ESHOO, and Mr.

SMITH of Washington) submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Outlining a vision to shape congressional information technology policy into the next century to promote and preserve the successes, leadership, and uniqueness of the

United States information technology sector.

Whereas continued growth in the information technology industry is the key to maintaining and strengthening the

competitiveness of the American economy and the technological advantage of the United States Armed Forces in

the 21st century;

Whereas private sector investment, initiative, and know-how

have been the driving forces in creating our Nation’s

leadership position in information technology;
2

•HCON 182 IH

Whereas industry has thrived because it has been free from

government interference and has been able to develop, innovate, and grow according to the demands of the free

market and consumers;

Whereas the Internet represents the next great mass communications technology, and government regulation of the

Internet and the high tech industry will harm their success and growth as the primary tools for communication

between people and businesses;

Whereas the Internet and other information technologies are

being used by United States businesses and consumers

for communications, entertainment, and information, and

for conducting commercial transactions;

Whereas electronic commerce is the new marketplace of the

21st century and is empowering consumers and having a

profound impact on the way business traditionally has

been conducted; and

Whereas development of a national information technology

policy must be based on free market principles that will

ensure that consumers and suppliers determine the most

desirable technologies: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in addressing issues of information

3 technology and electronic commerce policy, the Congress

4 must—

5 (1) focus on a broad spectrum of issues that

6 are essential to the evolution and strength of the

7 American information technology industry;
3

•HCON 182 IH

1 (2) ensure that it plays an enabling and not an

2 inhibiting role in supporting the movement of indus3 try and people into the Information Age;

4 (3) incorporate a principle of minimal and pre5 dictable government regulation; and

6 (4) refrain from acting in any capacity that

7 would enshrine or favor specific technologies or

8 standards.

Æ
No. 51231.

#### Protests 92977-K, etc., of Eugenio Lang, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Case No. 13,017.

#### SMITH v. BURLINGAME.

[4 Mason, 121.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Rhode Island.

Nov. Term, 1825.

Insanity — Guardian—Power to Appoint— Notice.

The courts of probate of Rhode Island cannot appoint a guardian of a person, as incapable of taking care of her estate, under the statute of 1798 (page 316), without notice to the party and an adjudication on the facts.

[Cited in North v. Joslin, 59 Mich. 647, 26 N. W. 810.]

Trespass and ejectment [by Mary Smith against Stephen Burlingame]. Plea, general issue. At the trial the defendant claimed title to the premises under a lease made by one Joseph Cady, as guardian of the plaintiff, appointed under the laws of Rhode Island, which authorize the courts of probate “to appoint guardians of all persons who are delirious, distracted, or non compos mentis, or who, for want of discretion in managing their estates, are likely to bring themselves and families to want and misery.” Dig. R. I. Laws 179S, p. 316, § 2. It was under this latter clause that Cady was appointed guardian by the court of probate; but no notice was given to the plaintiff previous to such appointment.

*460Steere & Searle, for plaintiff,

contended that, independent of all other objections to the appointment, — and they were prepared to make others, — the want of notice was a fatal objection, and had been so held in other states under statutes giving courts of probate a like authority.

Whipple & Tibbets, for defendant, argued e contra.

STORY, Circuit Justice.

My opinion is, that the objection is fatal. The courts of probate have no right to put a person under guardianship, as unfit to manage her affairs, without notice to the party, and an adjudication on the facts; and until such adjudication, no letters of guardianship can legally be issued. The case of Chase v. Hathaway, 14 Mass. 222, is directly in point, and with that case I entirely concur.

Verdict for the plaintiff.
No. P68/97.

protests 63/12677, etc. (San Francisco).

#### The Mundo Corporation and Arthur J. Fritz & Company *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cast-iron fittings, chiefly used for cast-iron pipe, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Mundo Corp.*and *Arthur J. Fritz & Company*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 303, C.D. 2640), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 266 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 266

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the benefits of music 
                               education.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 266

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas there is a growing body of scientific research demonstrating that 
        children who receive music instruction perform better on spatial-
        temporal reasoning tests and proportional math problems;
Whereas music education grounded in rigorous instruction is an important 
        component of a well-rounded academic program;
Whereas opportunities in music and the arts have enabled children with 
        disabilities to participate more fully in school and community 
        activities;
Whereas music and the arts can motivate at-risk students to stay in school and 
        become active participants in the educational process;
Whereas according to the College Board, college-bound high school seniors in 
        1998 who received music instruction scored 53 points higher on the 
        verbal portion of the Scholastic Aptitude Test and 39 points higher on 
        the math portion of the test than college-bound high school seniors with 
        no music or arts instruction;
Whereas a 1999 report by the Texas Commission on Drug and Alcohol Abuse states 
        that individuals who participated in band or orchestra reported the 
        lowest levels of current and lifelong use of alcohol, tobacco, and 
        illicit drugs; and
Whereas comprehensive, sequential music instruction enhances early brain 
        development and improves cognitive and communicative skills, self-
        discipline, and creativity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) music education enhances intellectual development and 
        enriches the academic environment for children of all ages; and
            (2) music educators greatly contribute to the artistic, 
        intellectual, and social development of American children, and 
        play a key role in helping children to succeed in school.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



ROCKFORD SINGAPORE CORPORATION
RUSS MOORE
SINGAPORE OPERATIONS MANAGER
102 East Pasir Panjang Road
Citilink Warehouse complex #07-06
Singapore  118529

Tele  011-65-278-8996
Fax   011-65-278-3116


ROCKFORD (EUROPE) ELEKTRONIK VERTRIEBS GMBH
JEAN-MICHEL BECK
EUROPEAN OPERATIONS MANAGER
Im Finigen 5
28832 Achim
Germany

Tele  011-49-4202-9450-0
Fax   011-49-4202-9750-50


ROCKFORD JAPAN CORPORATION
HARRY OMAE
PRESIDENT
514-1 Hita, Kannami-Cho
Tagata-Gun
Shizuoka-Ken, 419-01
Japan

Tele  011-81-559-791260
Fax   011-81-559-791265

ROCKFORD FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION
JEANNINE GIRAUDY-MCINTYRE
SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR, CORPORATE SERVICES
Ernst & Young Building
Bay Street
P.O. Box 261
Bridgetown,
Barbados

Tele  1-246-427-5260
Fax  1-246-426-9551
Case No. 10,283.

#### NOBLET et al. v. OHIO & M. R. CO.

[1 Cin. Law Bui. 346.]

Circuit Court, S. D. Ohio.

Oct. Term, 1876.

Service or Writ — Name of Corporation — Return — Amendment.

Where service is made upon the proper party, the writ, return and bill may be amended as to the name by which the defendant was sued. So *held*where the bill described the defendant as the “Ohio & Mississippi Railroad Co..” when it should have been the “Ohio & Mississippi Railway Company;”

[This was a motion by Samuel Noblet and others in a suit against the Ohio & Mississippi Railway Company.]

I. Moore, for plaintiff.

N. A. Jordan, for defendant.

SWING, District Judge.

The bill filed in this case describes the defendant as the Ohio & Mississippi Railroad Co., and the defendants answer in that name. The complainant has since discovered that the Ohio & Mississippi Railroad Company, prior to the bringing of this suit, had been reorganized and its name changed from that of the Ohio & Mississippi Railroad Co., to that of the Ohio & Mississippi Railway Company; that the ser*283vice was in fact made upon the proper officer of the Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.; and the complainant now moves the court for leave to amend the bill by inserting the true name of the corporation, and also to amend the writ and return of the marshal. The power of amendment by the federal courts is now very extensive, and looking at the statute and course of decisions, we think the amendments asked are within the power of the court. In Todd’s practice it is laid down that the declaration may be amended, even after the plea in abatement for misnomer. 1 Todd, Prac. 697. In the case of the corporation of Georgetown v. Beatty [Case No. 5,344], the plaintiff had leave to amend the writ and declaration by stating the plaintiffs to be “Mayor, recorder, alderman and common council of Georgetown,” instead of the “Corporation of Georgetown,” and there are numerous cases in which a corporation has been sued by a wrong name, that the plaintiff has been permitted to correct the mistake by an amendment of the writ. Burnham v. Savings Bank, 5 N. H. 573; Bullard v. Nantucket Bank, 5 Mass. 99; Sherman v. Connecticut River Bridge Co., 11 Mass. 338. The motion to amend is therefore granted, upon payment of costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 244 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 244

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2000

 Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Ney, Mr. Ehlers, 
Mr. Mica, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Frost, Mr. Cannon, and 
 Mr. LaTourette) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
         was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on May 4, 
2000, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of 
remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
No. 67677.

#### Le Trappeur, Inc., and Mattoon & Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/31259, 61/6737, and 61/12256.

Protests abandoned April

8,1963. (Not published.) (Initial No. 59/9999.) Plaintiffs’application for rehearing granted.
No. 60340.

protest 248691-K (New York).

#### H. S. Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opaque white glass stones of different sizes and shapes, faceted, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.