alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| RCC      Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Resource      Real Estate Funding 2007-1 CDO Investor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2007-1 Ltd.                                                     |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2007-1, LLC                                                     |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding 2006-1 CDO Investor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2006-1 Ltd.                                                     |
| Resource      Real Estate Funding CDO 2006-1, LLC                                                     |
| RCC      Real Estate SPE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability  company                                  |
| RCC      Real Estate SPE 2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability    company                              |
| RCC      Real Estate SPE 3, LLC, a Delaware limited liability    company                              |
| RCC      Real Estate Trophy Properties XV, LLC                                                        |
| Resource      TRS, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                       |
| RCC      Commercial, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                                     |
| Resource      Capital Funding LLC, a Delaware limited liability  company                              |
| Ischus      II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company                                             |
| Ischus      CDO II, Ltd., a Cayman Islands company                                                    |
| Apidos      Cinco CDO, Ltd (“TRS”), a Cayman Islands company                              |
| Apidos      CDO I, Ltd. (“TRS”)                                                           |
| Apidos      CDO III, Ltd., (“TRS”) a Delawarecompany                                      |

----

----
YOLO-SOLANO AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

PUBLIC WORKSHOP NOTICE

Proposed Adoption Of 

Rule 2.41, Expandable Polystyrene Manufacturing

Operations 

The Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (District) staff will hold a public workshop to

discuss the proposed adoption of District Rule 2.41, EXPANDABLE POLYSTYRENE

MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS. The proposed rule will limit the emissions of volatile

organic compounds from the manufacturing of expandable polystyrene products. The draft rule

and draft staff report will be available on the District’s website (www.ysaqmd.org) under the

Rules and Regulations link or may be obtained by contacting Courtney Graham at (530) 757-

3655.

The public workshop will be held at the following time and location:

Friday, July 18, 2008 at 1:00 p.m.

Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District

1947 Galileo Court, Suite 103

Davis, California 95618

 The District invites written public comments to be submitted to Susan K. McLaughlin at 1947

Galileo Court, Suite 103, Davis, CA 95618. Comments are to be received by the District by

July 24, 2008.
No. 60323.

protest 291212-K (Seattle).

#### The Specialty House, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the record showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-30-1997

<CASH>                                        9,195,503
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                17,821,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (454,552)
<INVENTORY>                                  15,598,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             44,182,177
<PP&E>                                      633,171,289
<DEPRECIATION>                             (218,693,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              481,341,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        30,780,641
<BONDS>                                     306,060,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                  114,855,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                481,341,781
<SALES>                                     $39,024,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $39,024,214
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                27,521,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            6,225,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               5,761,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           5,761,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  5,761,469
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        



</TABLE>
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 40

Honoring Morris King Udall, former United States Representative from

Arizona, and extending the condolences of the Congress on his death.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1999

Mr. KOLBE (for himself, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. STUMP, Mr. SALMON, Mr.

HAYWORTH, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. UDALL of

New Mexico) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring Morris King Udall, former United States Representative from Arizona, and extending the condolences

of the Congress on his death.

Whereas Morris King Udall served his Nation and his State

of Arizona with honor and distinction in his 30 years as

a Member of the United States House of Representatives;

Whereas Morris King Udall became an internationally recognized leader in the field of conservation, personally sponsoring legislation that more than doubled the National

Park and National Wildlife Refuge systems, and added

thousands of acres to America’s National Wilderness

Preservation System;
2

•HCON 40 IH

Whereas Morris King Udall was also instrumental in reorganizing the United States Postal Service, in helping

enact legislation to restore lands left in the wake of surface mining, enhancing and protecting the civil service,

and fighting long and consistently to safeguard the rights

and legacies of Native Americans;

Whereas in his lifetime, Morris King Udall became known as

a model Member of Congress and was among the most

effective and admired legislators of his generation;

Whereas this very decent and good man from Arizona also

left us with one of the most precious gifts of all—a special brand of wonderful and endearing humor that was

distinctly his;

Whereas Morris King Udall set a standard for all facing adversity as he struggled against the onslaught of Parkinson’s disease with the same optimism and humor that

were the hallmarks of his life; and

Whereas Morris King Udall in so many ways will continue to

stand as a symbol of all that is best about public service,

for all that is civil in political discourse, for all that is

kind and gentle, and will remain an inspiration to others:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the

4 death of the Honorable Morris King Udall on

5 December 12, 1998, and extends condolences to the

6 Udall family, and especially to his wife Norma;
3

•HCON 40 IH

1 (2) expresses its profound gratitude to the Hon2 orable Morris King Udall and his family for the

3 service that he rendered to his country; and

4 (3) recognizes with appreciation and respect the

5 Honorable Morris K. Udall’s commitment to and ex6 ample of bipartisanship and collegial interaction in

7 the legislative process.

8 SECTION. 2. TRANSMISSION OF ENROLLED RESOLUTION.

9 The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall

10 transmit an enrolled copy of this Concurrent Resolution

11 to the family of the Honorable Morris King Udall.

Æ
Before the Second Division,

October 9, 1958

No. 62359.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 180703-K, etc (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum alloys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 670), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  228,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,392
<INVENTORY>                                     16,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,635
<PP&E>                                         174,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 579,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,706
<BONDS>                                        274,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   579,907
<SALES>                                        561,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  431,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                81,227
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,464
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

Independent Auditors’Report on Compliance

 

Onyx AcceptanceCorporation

27051 Towne CentreDrive

Foothill Ranch, CA92610

 

And

 

JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Structured Finance

4 New York Plaza

6th Street

New York, NY 10001

 

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying *Report ofManagement on Compliance*, that Onyx Acceptance Corporation (“Onyx”),a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (“COAF”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital OneFinancial Corporation, complied in all material respects for the year ended December 31, 2005with the requirements of Sections 2.04(a),2.04(b), 3.07, 3.08(a), 3.09(a), 4.02(a), and 4.02(e) of the Sales and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 21, 2005 regarding theOnyx Acceptance Owner Trust 2005-B Class A Notes (the “Agreement”), whichwas filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K on July 26,2005. Management is responsible for Onyx’s compliance with thoserequirements.  Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about Onyx’s compliance based onour examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith attestation standards established by the U.S. Public Company AccountingOversight Board and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout Onyx’s compliance with those requirements and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion.  Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on Onyx’s compliance withspecified requirements.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that Onyxcomplied with the aforementioned Sections of the Agreement as of and for theyear ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 
| /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
|                      |
| March 30, 2006            |

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 3(I)


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                 THE THIRD RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                 POWERTEL, INC.

                                      ****

         Powertel, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify as follows:

         FIRST:   That in accordance with the requirements of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "General Corporation
Law"), the Board of Directors of the Corporation, in a unanimous written consent
pursuant to Section 141(f) of the General Corporation Law, duly adopted
resolutions: (i) proposing and declaring advisable an increase in the
Corporation's authorized capital stock; (ii) proposing and declaring advisable
the amendment of the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation to reflect such change; and (iii) recommending that such amendment
be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for consideration, action
and approval.

         SECOND:  That Section 5.1 of the Third Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

         "5.1     Authorized Shares

                  The aggregate number of shares of stock which the Corporation
         shall have the authority to issue is 401,000,000. 1,000,000 of such
         shares shall be Preferred Stock, having a par value of $.01 per share
         ("Preferred Stock"). 400,000,000 of such shares shall be Common Stock,
         all of one class, having a par value of $.01 per share ("Common
         Stock")."

         THIRD:  That, pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law,
the aforesaid amendment to the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation was
duly adopted by the stockholders of the Corporation at the annual meeting of
stockholders held on May 25, 2000.

         FOURTH:  That this Certificate of Amendment of the Third Restated
Certificate of Incorporation shall become effective upon filing with the
Delaware Secretary of State pursuant to Section 103(d) of the General
Corporation Law.


                                       21
<PAGE>   2

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Powertel, Inc. has caused this Certificate of
Amendment of the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by
Allen E. Smith, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and attested by
Lorena G. Turner, its Assistant Secretary, on June 15, 2000.

                                   POWERTEL, INC.



                                   By:   /s/ Allen E. Smith
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Allen E. Smith
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Attest:


  /s/ Lorena G. Turner
-------------------------------
Lorena G. Turner
Assistant Secretary
EX-99.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmaceutical  Resources,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Dennis
J. O'Connor,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

       (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/S/ Dennis J. O'Connor
---------------------------------
Dennis J. O'Connor
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
Before the First Division,

October 31, 1967

No. P67/370.

No. P67/371.

No. P67/372.

No. P67/373.

No. P67/374.

#### Carson M. Simon & Company *v.*United States, protests 320842-K, etc. (Philadelphia). Morris Friedman *v.*United States, protests 321749-K, etc. (Philadelphia). Morris Friedman et al. *v.*United States, protests 59/29762,etc. (Philadelphia). Morris Friedman v. United States, protests 59/29788, etc. (Philadelphia). Rice Bayersdorfer Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/19191, etc. (Philadelphia).

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bags or baskets in chief value of rush similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 354

Commending Ambassador Stephen S.F. Chen for his many years of distinguished service to the Republic of China on Taiwan and for his friendship

with the people of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 2000

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr.

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. SALMON, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr. ARMEY, and Mr. DELAY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending Ambassador Stephen S.F. Chen for his many

years of distinguished service to the Republic of China

on Taiwan and for his friendship with the people of

the United States.

Whereas Ambassador Stephen S.F. Chen of Taiwan has been

a member of the diplomatic service of the Republic of

China on Taiwan over a period of 47 years;

Whereas Ambassador Chen has represented Taiwan in such

countries as the Philippines, Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia,

and the United States;

Whereas Ambassador Chen has held a number of important

positions in Taiwan, including the positions of Vice For-
2

•HCON 354 IH

eign Minister and Deputy Secretary-General to President

Lee Teng-hui;

Whereas Ambassador Chen’s many years of service in the

United States include appointments as Taiwan’s ConsulGeneral in Atlanta (1973 to 1979) and as Director of the

Coordination Council for North American Affairs in Chicago (1980 to 1982) and Los Angeles (1988 to 1989);

Whereas Ambassador Chen has served with distinction as the

senior diplomat of Taiwan in the United States since

1997, when he became the Representative of the Taipei

Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the District of Columbia; and

Whereas Ambassador Chen has been a staunch friend of the

people of the United States and a determined advocate

of closer ties between Taiwan and the United States, and

has earned the respect and genuine affection of many

Members of Congress: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends Ambassador Stephen S.F. Chen

4 for his many years of distinguished service to the

5 Republic of China on Taiwan;

6 (2) expresses appreciation to Ambassador Ste7 phen S.F. Chen for his friendship with the people of

8 the United States; and
3

•HCON 354 IH

1 (3) extends the best wishes of the Congress to

2 Ambassador Chen and his family on the occasion of

3 his retirement.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DARRELL D. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5342RBL

ORDER TO PROVIDE A

SIGNED CONSENT FOR

RECOVERY OF COSTS 

The Court, has reviewed plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. # 1). Plaintiff

meets the criteria for proceeding in forma pauperis. However, plaintiff returned the consent for recovery

of costs form without filling out the form. (Dkt. # 3). The court directs the clerk of court to re-send

the consent form to plaintiff with a copy of this order.

Plaintiff will have until August 11th, 2006 to fill out the form and return it to court. Failure to

return the form, or failure to complete the form will result in a Report and Recommendation that the

application to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. The clerk is directed to calendar the August 11th

2006, date on the court’s calendar.

DATED this 17th, day of July, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05342-RBL Document 4 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 56227.

protest 173783-K (Cleveland).

#### The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the Court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.