alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Anthony Welch, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report of Boveran Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The  small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)) for the small business  issuer  and  have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed  in this  report any  change in  the small business issuer's  internal control over  financial reporting that occurred during the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





---

5.

The  small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,  process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  February 13, 2009



By:

/s/ Anthony Welch

Anthony Welch

Chief Executive Officer
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Margaret Mazur, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 291 C.D. 2018

:

Unemployment Compensation :

Board of Review, :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, October 15, 2018

, upon consideration of petitioner’s

application for re argument , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
Form of Lien Release Letter, dated July 7, 2003



 Exhibit 10.58 
  
 FORM OF LIEN RELEASE AUTHORIZATION LETTER 
  
 September 12, 2003 
  

Antares Pharma, Inc. 
 707 Eagleview Boulevard 
 Exton, PA 19341 
  
 Pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated as of
January 31, 2003, by and among Xmark Fund, L.P., Xmark Fund, Ltd., SDS Merchant Fund, L.P. (collectively, the “Investors”) and Antares Pharma, Inc. (“the Company”), the Company granted to the Investors a security interest in
certain of the assets of the Company. In connection with that certain Securities Exchange Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2004, by and among the Investors and the Company, this letter will confirm that you are authorized to file a UCC-3
terminating the aforesaid security interest. 
  
 Very truly yours, 
  

		
	 By:
	 	

	 	 	 Name:
 Title:
# Official Journal C 121/6 Ap

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 121 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 616 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 121

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 616 April 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 121/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 121/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 14 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 121/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 121/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

14

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 121/03 | State aid — Slovenia — State aid SA.33229 2018/C (ex 2017/N-3) — Amendments of the restructuring commitments of Nova Ljubljanska Banka d.d. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 15 |
| 2018/C 121/04 | State aid — The Netherlands — State Aid SA.46470 (2017/C) (ex 2017/NN) — Possible State aid in favour of Inter IKEA — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 30 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 121/03

State aid — Slovenia — State aid SA.33229 2018/C (ex 2017/N-3) — Amendments of the restructuring commitments of Nova Ljubljanska Banka d.d. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

15

2018/C 121/04

State aid — The Netherlands — State Aid SA.46470 (2017/C) (ex 2017/NN) — Possible State aid in favour of Inter IKEA — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

30

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Attachment3_ Phantom pilot training guide V1.1 

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/phantom-2-vision/en/Phantom_2_Vision_Pilot_

Training_Guide_en.pdf (exceeds file upload size)
No. 59347.

protests 809886-G, etc. (New York).

#### Brenner Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

*272Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Technology Solutions Company.
 Date: August 14, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ SANDOR GROSZSandor GroszChief Financial Officer
October 13, 1959

No. 63446.

Suit 4975.

#### Keer, Maurer Company *v.*United States.

C.D. 2018 affirmed June 30, 1959. C.A.D. 710.
No. 63945.

protests 998347-G, etc. (New York).

#### Julius Wile Sons & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that ¡the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         8,920,126
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,365,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                   481,661
<INVENTORY>                                    14,107,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               43,479,708
<PP&E>                                         693,764,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (249,850,311)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 519,283,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44,496,734
<BONDS>                                        322,390,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,846,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   519,283,217
<SALES>                                        40,871,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               40,871,074
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29,703,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,140,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,376,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,376,093
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,376,093
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         484,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,719,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,427,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,721,240
<PP&E>                                         514,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,475,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,423,820
<BONDS>                                      6,330,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    866,449
<COMMON>                                         7,364
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,475,612
<SALES>                                      5,638,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,638,628
<CGS>                                        5,346,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,346,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,268,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             216,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,213,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,213,051)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,240,289)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

February 18, 1953

No. 57082.

protests 148254-K, 151347-K, and 160394-K (New York).

#### Hughes Fawcett, Inc. *v.*United States,

Lawrence, Judge:

The protests enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and forming part of our decision herein, relate to the proper dutiable classification of certain imported heel serts, together with nails and templates, packed in printed paper envelopes. The collector of customs classified the articles in issue as entireties, and duty was assessed thereon at 22J4 per centum ad valorem within the provisions in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dee. 305, T. D. 51802, as articles not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of metal.

. The plaintiff in its protests, or by amendments thereto, sets forth various claims for the assessment of a lower rate of duty, but in view of the conclusion we have reached herein, it is unnecessary to set them forth.

The parties have submitted these cases for decision upon a written stipulation of counsel to the effect that the items of merchandise marked “A” and initialed “DJK” on the invoices accompanying the entries, consist of metal heel serts and accessories similar in all material respects to the merchandise which was the subject of *Hughes Fawcett, Inc.*v. *United States,*29 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1434, the record in which ease has been incorporated herein. In the cited case, it was held that the serts, nails, and templates do not constitute entireties in contemplation of law; that in treating them as such the' appraisement was void; that,' consequently, the liquidation of the entry was premature and void; that, therefore, the protest was premature and, accordingly, was dismissed and the matter referred to a single judge to determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise pursuant to the terms of section 16 (c) of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).

Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, we hold that the items of merchandise marked “A,” as aforesaid, on the invoices do not constitute entireties and that the appraisement of them as such was null and void. Consequently, the liquidation of the entries was premature and a nullity in view of the absence of a legal appraisement. Hdnce, the protests filed herein are likewise premature and do not invoke our jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of these cases. We therefore dismiss the protests as premature and, in accordance with the statutory instructions contained in 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d), we remand the cases to a single judge to determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise in the manner prescribed by law.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 60619.

#### Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 247671-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of metal-spray gun machines the same in all material respects as those the 'subject of *Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 205, C. D. 1775), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
*** EO 12866 Review Draft – Do Not Quote,Cite, or Release During the Review ***EO12866_RIN2070-AJ92_Formaldehyde-Imp_NPRM_EA-A4-table_2012-02-27.docxReg Plan Costs and Benefits Table forFormaldehyde Emissions Standards for Composite Wood Products; Proposed RuleSAN 5287; RIN 2070-AJ92Source citation:Economic Analysis of the Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products Act Implementing Regulations ProposedRule.Category Primary Estimate Low Estimate High EstimateUnitsNotes/Source CitationYearDollarsDisc Period CoveredBenefitsAnnualized Monetized$millions/yearNot estimated $91 $137 2010 7% 2014 to 2044 Source: EA, ExecutiveSummaryNot estimated $184 $278 2010 3% 2014 to 2044Annualized QuantifiedNot estimated Not estimated Not estimated 7%Not estimated Not estimated Not estimated 3%Qualitative:Unquantified benefits due to avoided casesof upper respiratory tract pathology, pulmonary function, allergic sensitization,immune function effects,neurological and behavioral toxicity, and developmental toxicity.CostsAnnualized Monetized$millions/yearNot estimated $72 $81 2010 7% 2014 to 2044Source: EA, ExecutiveSummaryNot estimated $81 $89 2010 3% 2014 to 2044Annualized QuantifiedNot estimated Not estimated Not estimated 7%Not estimated Not estimated Not estimated 3%QualitativeTransfersFederal Annualized Monetized$millions/yearNot applicable Not applicable Not applicableNot applicable Not applicable Not applicableFrom: To:Other Annualized Monetized$millions/yearNot applicable Not applicable Not applicable 7%Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 3%From: To:EffectsState, Local, and/or Tribal GovernmentGovernment entities are not expected to be subject to the rule’srequirements, which apply to entities that manufacture, fabricate, distribute, or sell composite woodproducts. The rule does not have a significant intergovernmental mandate, significant or unique effect on small governments, or have Federalism implications.Small BusinessApproximately 879,000 small firms impacted:~851,000 have costs impacts < 1% of revenues, ~23,000 firms have impacts between 1% and 3%, and ~4,000 firmshave impacts > 3% of revenues. Most firms with impacts > 1% have annualized costs < $250.WagesNot estimatedGrowthNot estimated. Unlikely – rule costs are less than $1 billion per year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                       123
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,300)
<INVENTORY>                                     16,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,232
<PP&E>                                          46,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,122)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,635
<BONDS>                                          1,239
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,236
<SALES>                                         24,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,501
<CGS>                                           23,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (28)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,744)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
R. Jackson, III, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods stated therein.


By: /s/ Albert R. Jackson, III
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
    May 15, 2003
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD

SUBJECT: Meeting with State-EPA Roundtable

DATE: Tuesday, May 27, 2014

TIME: Noon – 1:30 PM

Participants:

EPA – Sara Hisel-McCoy, Grace Robiou, Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, Janita Aguirre, Christina

Christensen, Heather Goss, Gary Russo, Rosaura Conde, Ruth Chemerys, Ellen Weitzler, Wayne

Jackson, Cheryl Atkinson, Lisa Perras-Gordon, David Pfeifer, Russell Nelson, Ann Lavaty,

Phillip Woods, William Beckwith

ACWA/States – Gerry Szal (Massachusetts), Scott Stoner (New York), Jason Childress

(Oklahoma), Mike Tate (Kansas), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay

Patterson (Wyoming), Deb Smith (California), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska), Cheryl Niemi

(Washington), Susan Braley (Washington)

Summary of Meeting: Participants discussed options derived from public comments received.

Agenda

TOPIC TIME LEAD__________

1. Workgroup Roll Call 10 min Aguirre

2. Roundtable Input on Options 60 min Roundtable

3. Questions & Answers 15 min Roundtable

4. Reminders for next Roundtable meeting 5 min Aguirre