alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                           1,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,000
<INVENTORY>                                     93,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,757
<PP&E>                                          23,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,180)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,528
<SALES>                                        104,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,388
<CGS>                                           55,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,777
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
        

</TABLE>
# Andrew D’Amora

**Regional Administrators**
Region 2 Deputy Administrator 

Andrew D’Amora currently serves as the Deputy Regional Administrator of FEMA Region 2.

Selected September 2022, D’Amora is responsible for the administration and oversight of all emergency management programs, including response, recovery and preparedness in the states of New Jersey and New York, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Territory of the United States Virgin Islands and the Native American Tribal Nations in the Region.

D’Amora has been a dedicated public servant for more than three decades serving in critical leadership roles in the New York City Police Department (NYPD) and New York City Emergency Management (NYCEM).

Prior to joining FEMA, D’Amora served as the Commissioner of NYCEM, where he led the agency through a mayoral transition and advanced key initiatives including updating several plans, such as the Citywide Incident Management System and Strategic Plan, to ensure they were comprehensive and understandable.

In his role as NYCEM’s Chief of Staff, D’Amora managed the deployment of New York City staff to support Hurricane Maria response operations in San Juan, Puerto Rico. He also coordinated NYCEM’s response to events ranging from extreme heat to building collapses. As First Deputy Commissioner, D’Amora led NYCEM through disasters that varied in scope, including Tropical Storm Isaias, remnants of Hurricane Ida and COVID-19 response.

Earlier in his distinguished career D’Amora served as NYPD’s Commanding Officer of the Operations Division where he responded to the September 11th terrorist attacks, large-scale planned and unplanned events like the iconic New Year's Eve celebration in Times Square, the New York City Marathon and hurricanes Irene and Sandy. In this critical role he also oversaw interagency coordination through the Joint Operations Center.

After serving in several commands throughout New York City’s  five boroughs, he completed his 32-year career in the rank of Deputy Chief.

D'Amora holds a Master of Science in Protection Management with a concentration in Emergency Management from John Jay College and a Bachelor of Science degree in Organizational Management from St. Joseph's College. He is also a graduate of the Homeland Security Executive Leaders Program at the Naval Postgraduate School’s Center for Homeland Defense and Security and is a graduate of the Police Management Institute at Columbia University.

Last updated November 22, 2023

Return to top
Case No. 14,318.

#### TYSON v. The PANAMA.

[See Case No. 11,697-]
No. 54466.

#### R. W. Smith *v.*United States,

protest 151077-K (Galveston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

An examination of the collector’s report on protest, received in evidence, indicates that an allowance of refund of $35 in duty would have been granted if at the time of liquidation the orders of the Department of Agriculture refusing admission of the seed and the export entry had been attached to the entry. Counsel for the defendant stated that the Government recommended that allowances be made in accordance with the collector’s report. The protest was therefore sustained and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff directing that a refund of $35 in duty be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          80,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,692)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           619
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,152)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,337
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.079)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.079)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,309
<SECURITIES>                                     4,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,827
<PP&E>                                           6,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,147)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,779
<BONDS>                                            830
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,586
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,485)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,710
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,463
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,096
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William M. Lutz, hereby certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Quarterly Report of Salton, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 29, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofSalton, Inc.         By:                                                          /s/ William M. Lutz    William M. Lutz    Chief Executive Officer   November 13, 2007This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.(the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference intoany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Salton,Inc. and will be retained by Salton, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
No. 59353.

protest 248965-K (New York).

#### Air Express Int’l Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0411

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

TERRENCE JAMES THIBEAULT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 21, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 29 2020

06/29/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0411
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AS OF AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED ON FORM
S-3 BY THE COMPANY.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                       218
<INVENTORY>                                      6,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,379
<PP&E>                                          19,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,374
<BONDS>                                          5,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           318
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,433
<SALES>                                         34,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,583
<CGS>                                           20,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (114)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,305)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,305)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.****2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Xurui Guangdian Co., Ltd.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-171107) on Form S-8 of SemiLEDs Corporation of our report dated November 20, 2012, with respect to the balance sheet of Xurui Guangdian Co., Ltd. as of August 31, 2012, and the related statements of operations, equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year ended August 31, 2012, which report appears in Amendment No. 1 to the August 31, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K/A of SemiLEDs Corporation. Our report dated November 20, 2012 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that Xurui Guangdian Co., Ltd. has incurred net losses since its inception, has an accumulated deficit, and has defaulted on certain bank loans. These conditions along with other matters raise substantial doubt about Xurui Guangdian Co., Ltd.’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

 

 

/s/ ShineWing Certified Public Accountants

ShineWing Certified Public Accountants

Beijing, People’s Republic of China

February 6, 2013

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Timothy P. Dimond, the Chief Financial Officer of Technology Solutions
Company, certify that:



| | (i) |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Technology Solutions
Company.
| | ---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
    
    November 12, 2003
    
    By:
    
    /s/ TIMOTHY P. DIMONDTimothy P. DimondChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Technology Solutions Company and will
be retained by Technology Solutions Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended October 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence A. Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  This certification accompanies the Report and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.    /s/ Lawrence A. KenyonLawrence A. Kenyon
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 6, 2009
No. 65313.

#### Hercules Div. of the Cleveland Welding Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/14034, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

February 26, 1953

No. 57093.

protests 133849-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain ' items of the merchandise consist of china figures similar in all material respects to the figures passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
A89A2258.

#### BARBER v. COLLINS.

(390 SE2d 633)

Sognier, Judge.

Eugene Barber submitted to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Fulton County an affidavit of indigency and a claim to be asserted against Marcus E. Collins in his capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Revenue. Pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-2 (d), the clerk presented the pleading to a judge of that court, who ordered that the claim be filed. The claim subsequently was presented to another judge of the superior court, who entered an order finding that the claim showed a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact. Barber appeals from the order denying filing of his claim.

1. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is wholly without merit because OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) expressly provides that “[a]n order denying filing shall be appealable in the same manner as an order dismissing an action,” and here the order appealed from was final within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) in that the case was no *386longer pending in the court below.

Decided February 2, 1990.

Eugene Barber, *pro se.*

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, H. Perry Michael, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Harrison W. Kohler, Deputy Attorney General, David I. Adelman,*for appellee.

2. Appellant contends the order appealed from was invalid because of the issuance of the first order directing the filing of his complaint. We agree and reverse. OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) provides that when a *pro se*civil action and affidavit of indigency are presented to the court, the clerk “shall present the complaint or other initial pleading to *a*judge of the court” for review. (Emphasis supplied.) Here, that procedure was followed, and the judge to whom appellant’s claim was presented found that the complaint set forth a justiciable issue, and directed the clerk to file the pleadings. This order was not vacated or withdrawn, nor was it revised or revoked during the same term of court by the judge who issued it. Compare *LeCraw v. Atlanta Arts Alliance,*126 Ga. App. 656, 663 (191 SE2d 572) (1972). Accordingly, the second order denying filing was a nullity.

3. In his notice of appeal appellant petitions for recusal of the judge who entered the second order. There is nothing in the record to indicate that appellant filed a motion for recusal in the superior court or obtained a ruling from the lower court on this issue. Accordingly, this court has nothing to review. *Savage v. Savage,*234 Ga. 853, 856 (218 SE2d 568) (1975).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.*
No. 63950.

protests 59/4567, etc. (New York).

#### Baltic Trading Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that an allowance was made for gelatinous substance on certain canned hams and similar pork products equal to 8 percent of the contents of the tins, whereas there should have been an allowance of 12 percent. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Axel Stokby et al.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C.D. 358), the merchandise was held dutiable at 3% cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the tins, less an allowance for gelatinous substance equal to 12 percent of the contents of each tin.
No. 50791.

#### Protests 97124-K, etc., of D. Costalos (New York).

*198Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of *21/2*percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.