alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of America Service Group
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 3, 2006
                                                  Name: /s/ Michael W. Taylor
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Title: Senior Vice President &
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael R. Gorsage, the Chief Executive Officer of Technology Solutions Company, certifythat:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technology Solutions Company;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures, andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c.  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 11, 2005 By:  /s/ MICHAEL R. GORSAGE    Michael R. Gorsage    Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

PAUL C. CULLOM, JR. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN DOES 1-20, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C06-0957C

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE by Friday, August 4, 2006, at 4:30 p.m.

why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) or under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Pursuant to Rule 8(a),

the complaint must include a plain statement of the claim showing that the pleaders are entitled to relief

against each defendant. The Court directs that Plaintiffs respond to this Show Cause Order by

submitting an amended complaint. While Plaintiffs need not set forth a complete and convincing picture

of the alleged wrongdoing in this amended complaint, they must at least set forth enough details so as to

provide Defendants and the Court with a fair idea of the basis of the complaint. In particular, the Court

directs Plaintiffs to clarify the legal and factual bases for jurisdiction and the relief claimed. Failure to

comply with this Order by Friday, August 4, 2006, at 4:30 p.m. will result in dismissal of this action

Case 2:06-cv-00957-JCC Document 2 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

without prejudice.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2006.AUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00957-JCC Document 2 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

                         SLT REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                       2231 East Camelback Road Suite 410
                             Phoenix, Arizona 85016

                             STARWOOD LODGING TRUST
                      2231 East Camelback Road Suite 410
                             Phoenix, Arizona 85016

                                  April 9,1997


VIA FACSIMILE

Prudential Property Investment Separate Account II 
c/o Prudential Real Estate Investors 
8 Campus Drive
Parsippany, NJ 07054 
Attn: Gary L. Kauffman 
(Fax 201 683-1790)
Attn: James P. Walker, Esq. 
(Fax 201 683-1788)


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the terms of that certain Purchase Money Promissory Note, in the
original amount of $97,500,000.00, by and between the undersigned and Prudential
Property Investment Separate Account II, dated February 14, 1997, notice is
hereby given under section 1. (c). that the undersigned hereby exercise their
option to extend the maturity date of said note from April 15, 1997 to May 14,
1997.

                                  Very truly yours,

                                  SLT REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware 
                                  limited partnership

                                  By: STARWOOD LODGING TRUST, a Maryland real 
                                      estate investment trust, its general 
                                      partner


                                  By: /s/ Ronald Brown
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Ronald Brown, Senior Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer


cc: Robert S. Insolia, Esq. 
    (Fax 212 326-2061)
Exhibit
 32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick G. LePore, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which
it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before
or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.    /s/ Patrick G. LePore Patrick G. LePore Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer August 7, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6217

ADALBERTO FIANDOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; MANAGER

BERNARDO, Inmate Systems,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:04-hc-00511-FL)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adalberto Fiandor, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Adalberto Fiandor, a state prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Fiandor v. Stansberry, No. 5:04-hc-00511-FL

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Cavalier Group (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report),
I, Gerald W. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|3. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|4. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: February 15, 2007

/s/ Gerald W. Williams

Gerald W. Williams Chief Financial
Officer

---
Exhibit 32.2       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence A. Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.  /s/ Lawrence A. KenyonLawrence A. Kenyon
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 6, 2009
BefoRE Chiee Judge Bao,

September 29, 1966

No. R66/52.

#### F. B. Vandegrift *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisement 255956-A (Philadelphia).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *United States*v. *The Reyman Company, Inc.*(50 Cust. Ct. 564, A.R.D. 157), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for determining the value for the sisal pads in issue and that such value is $0.075 per pound, net packed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DARREL WAYNE VANDERGRIFF,

Plaintiff,

v.

TONY GAMBONE et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5381RBL

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed the file, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J.

Kelley Arnold, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. An answer has

been filed and plaintiff can show no injury as a result of the two-month

delay in this case.

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants, and

to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold .

DATED this 1st day of May, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05381-RBL Document 54 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 1
H. Con. Res. 24 Agreed to April 12, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas at the heart of the Oslo peace process lies the basic,

irrevocable commitment made by Palestinian Chairman Yasir

Arafat that, in his words, ‘‘all outstanding issues relating to

permanent status will be resolved through negotiations’’;

Whereas resolving the political status of the territory controlled

by the Palestinian Authority while ensuring Israel’s security is

one of the central issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict;

Whereas a declaration of statehood by the Palestinians outside

the framework of negotiations would, therefore, constitute a most

fundamental violation of the Oslo process;

Whereas Yasir Arafat and other Palestinian leaders have repeatedly

threatened to declare unilaterally the establishment of a Palestinian state;

Whereas the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state would

introduce a dramatically destabilizing element into the Middle

East, risking Israeli countermeasures, a quick descent into

violence, and an end to the entire peace process; and

Whereas, in light of continuing statements by Palestinian leaders,

United States opposition to any unilateral Palestinian declaration

of statehood should be made clear and unambiguous: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That—

(1) the final political status of the territory controlled by

the Palestinian Authority can only be determined through negotiations and agreement between Israel and the Palestinian

Authority;

(2) any attempt to establish Palestinian statehood outside

the negotiating process will invoke the strongest congressional

opposition; and

(3) the President should unequivocally assert United States

opposition to the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state,

making clear that such a declaration would be a grievous
H. Con. Res. 24—2

violation of the Oslo accords and that a declared state would

not be recognized by the United States.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
(Reap. Dec. 11101)

#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 15312.

(Decided November 12, 1965)

*Schwartz & Lidstrom*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise of the instant appeal consists of printing equipment which was imported at Chicago, Ill., from Sweden and advanced in value upon reappraisement. The appeal was submitted to the court upon a stipulation which reads as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff, and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise involved consists of printing equipment described on the invoice as one “Super Como 46” Automatic Spacing Cutter with accessories, which was exported from Sweden on November 4, 1963.

> 2. That the merchandise in question was entered into the United States after February 28, 1958 and that the merchandise does not appear on the Secretary’s Final List T.D. 54521.

> 3. That at the time of exportation to the United States of said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold in the principal markets of Sweden, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to *675placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $7,600 net, packed, less ocean freight and insurance in the amount of $391.10.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Appeal for Re-appraisement may be submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find:

1. That export value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1401a(b) (section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956), is the proper basis for determination of the value of the involved merchandise; and

2. That such value is $7,600 net, packed, less ocean freight and insurance in the amount of $391.10.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, O. C, 2085)

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD.

August 3, 2017

Ms. Jessica Ann West-Salazar
7135 Elusive Pass
San Antonio, Texas 78233

Dear Ms. West-Salazar:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after
consultation with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved your
request pursuant to section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to become an institution-
affiliated party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”),
Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan holding company (“SLHC”). This approval is limited
to your being an institution-affiliated party of State Farm, including by working for an
independently owned agency that sells State Farm insurance products and products for State
Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington,
Illinois. If you seek to work for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), or an
independently owned agency that sells products for another SLHC or BHC, you must obtain the
Board's approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you to
the Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented could result in a
different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These representations
constitute conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and decision herein and,
as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. This action is also conditioned
specifically on your receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals and compliance with any terms
and conditions that may be imposed upon such approvals. Additionally, if you are convicted of,
or enter into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or
money laundering in the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC, BHC, or
independently owned agency that sells products for an SLHC or BHC, including any agency that
sells States Farm and State Farm Bank products.

Sincerely,

A aee uu (Y) Sar nbleg,

Margaret McCloskey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board

112 U.S.C. § 1829,