alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 24, 2011
By:
/s/Alan S. GeverAlan S. GeverExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

May 29, 1967

No. P67/175.

#### Kelvin and Hughes America Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 62/5264 (Baltimore).

Kao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of echo-sounding equipment or essential parts thereof dedicated to use therewith, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kelvin & Hughes America Corp.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 21, C.D. 2468), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
77849.

#### In the Interest of M. M., a child.

(392 SE2d 577)

Decided February 20, 1990.

*Elliott A. Shoenthal, Brian W. Wertheim,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, R. Andrew Weathers, George J. Robinson, Jr., Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

Pope, Judge.

This court having entered a judgment in the above-styled case at 190 Ga. App. 795 (380 SE2d 75) (1989) vacating the judgment of the trial court, and remanding the case with direction, and the judgment of this court having been reversed on certiorari by the Supreme Court in *State v. M. M.,*259 Ga. 637 (386 SE2d 35) (1989), judgment heretofore rendered by this court is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.*
December 1, 2020

Ross Oklewicz, Esq.

Associate Counsel

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Boulevard 

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

Dear Mr. Oklewicz:

Acting under authority delegated by the Board,1 I have determined not to 

disapprove the notice filed under the Change in Bank Control Act (“CIBC Act”) 

(12 U.S.C. § 1817(j)) by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“VGI”), Malvern, 

Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and the investment 

companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other pooled 

investment vehicles, and institutional accounts that are sponsored, managed, or 

advised by VGI (collectively, “Notificants”), to acquire aggregate control of 

15 percent or more of KeyCorp, parent of KeyBank, National Association, both of 

Cleveland, Ohio. In taking this action, I have considered the notice in light of the 

relevant statutory factors under the CIBC Act.

This determination is based on the specific facts and representations 

provided to the Board by Notificants. Any material change in those facts and 

representations could result in a different conclusion and should be immediately 

reported to staff at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (“Reserve Bank”). This 

action is specifically conditioned on compliance with all the commitments made to 

the Board related to this notice.

2

 For purposes of this action, the commitments are 

deemed to be conditions imposed in writing by the Board in connection with the 

 1

 12 CFR 265.5(c)(2).

2

 See Letter from Mark Van Der Weide to Anne Robinson (November 26, 2019), 

available at 

https://www.federalreserve.gov/supervisionreg/legalinterpretations/bhcchangeinco

ntrol20191126a.pdf.
2

findings and decision herein and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under 

applicable law. 

The CIBC Act requires that each insured bank or bank holding company 

promptly report to the appropriate federal banking agency any change or 

replacement of its chief executive officer or any of its directors that occurs within 

the 12 months following any change in control and that it provide a statement of 

the past and current business and professional affiliations of the new chief 

executive officer or directors. We would appreciate Notificants’ cooperation in 

ensuring that, if any such changes occur, the required information be submitted to 

the Reserve Bank.

Very truly yours,

(Signed) Ann E. Misback

Ann E. Misback

Secretary of the Board

cc: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of Harry &
David Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 26, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 16, 2010



By:

/s/ Steven J. HeyerSteven J. HeyerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Edward F. DunlapEdward F. DunlapChief Financial Officer
No. 67221.

protests 60/25791, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk wearing apparel similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 CCPA 136, C.A.D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.11.1    
    


 
 

CORPORATE TRADENAME AND TRADEMARK AGREEMENT—AMENDMENT    
    


        DuPont and DPI hereby agree to amend the Corporate Tradename and Trademark Agreement made and entered into by them May 7, 1998, as follows: 


        Section 5.1(c)
is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language: 



        "5.1(c)
If the Licensor ceases to be the largest shareholder of common stock of the Licensee, and the new largest shareholder is, in the Licensor's reasonable judgment, someone other
than a passive shareholder." 



	        E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.	 	DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.
	

        By: /s/ SUSAN M. STALNECKER	
 	

By: /s/ JOHN M. LYNN
	

        Name: Susan M. Stalnecker	
 	

Name: John M. Lynn
	

        Title: Vice President and Treasurer	
 	

Title: Executive Vice President and General Counsel











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.11.1


CORPORATE TRADENAME AND TRADEMARK AGREEMENT—AMENDMENT
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 1, 2005 |  |  |  | /S/    KENNETH R. HANKS
|                       |  |  |  | Kenneth R. Hanks       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 27374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11548]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7455]

Determination and Certification Under Section 490(b)(1)(A) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act Relating to the Largest Exporting and Importing 
Countries of Certain Precursor Chemicals

    Pursuant to Section 490(b)(1)(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961, as amended, I hereby determine and certify that the top five 
exporting and importing countries and territories of pseudoephedrine 
and ephedrine (Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Thailand, 
Taiwan, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom) have cooperated 
fully with the United States, or have taken adequate steps on their 
own, to achieve full compliance with the goals and objectives 
established by the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in 
Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
    This Determination and Certification shall be published in the 
Federal Register, and copies shall be provided to the Congress together 
with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification.

    Dated: March 11, 2011.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-11548 Filed 5-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-17-P
```
Before the First Division,

December 13, 1967

No. P67/433.

No. P67/434.

#### Kwan Yuen Co. *v.*United States, protests 63/6711, etc. (Los Angeles). Moskatel’s, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 63/9699, etc. (Los Angeles).

Beckworti-i, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rattan-core coolie hat planters, sleighs, trays, and hanging planters, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Royal Cathay Trading Co.*and *W. J. Byrnes & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 371, C.D. 2662), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 289

Condemning the racist and anti-Semitic views of the Reverend Al Sharpton.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2000

Mr. SCARBOROUGH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the racist and anti-Semitic views of the

Reverend Al Sharpton.

Whereas the Congress strongly rejects the racist and incendiary actions of the Reverend Al Sharpton;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has condoned anti-Semitic views in that protesters from the Reverend

Sharpton’s National Action Network have referred to

members of the Jewish faith as ‘‘bloodsucking [J]ews’’,

and ‘‘Jew bastards’’;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has referred to members

of the Jewish faith as ‘‘white interlopers’’ and ‘‘diamond

merchants’’;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton was found guilty of defamation by a jury in a New York court arising from the

false accusation that former Assistant District Attorney
2

HCON 289 IH

Steven Pagones, who is white, raped and assaulted a fifteen year-old black girl;

Whereas, to this day, the Reverend Al Sharpton has refused

to accept responsibility and expresses no regret for defaming Mr. Pagones;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton’s vicious verbal anti-Semitic attacks directed at members of the Jewish faith,

and in particular, a Jewish landlord, arising from a simple landlord-tenant dispute with a black tenant, incited

widespread violence, riots, and the murder of five innocent people;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton’s fierce demagoguery incited violence, riots, and murder in the Crown Heights

section of Brooklyn, New York, following the accidental

death of a black pedestrian child hit by the motorcade of

Orthodox Rabbi Menachem Schneerson;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton led a protest in the

Crown Heights neighborhood and marched next to a protester with a sign that read, ‘‘The White Man is the

Devil’’;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has insulted members of

the Jewish faith by challenging Jews to violence and stating to Jews to ‘‘pin down’’ their yarmulkes; and

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has practiced the politics

of racial division and made inflammatory remarks against

whites by characterizing the death of Amadou Diallo as

a ‘‘racially motivated police ‘assassination’ ’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—
3

HCON 289 IH

1 (1) condemns the practices of the Reverend Al

2 Sharpton, which seek to divide Americans on the

3 basis of race, ethnicity, and religion;

4 (2) expresses its outrage over the violence that

5 has resulted due to the Reverend Al Sharpton’s in6 cendiary words and actions; and

7 (3) fervently urges elected officials and public

8 servants, who have condoned and legitimized the

9 Reverend Al Sharpton’s incendiary words and ac10 tions, to publicly denounce and condemn such racist

11 and anti-Semitic views.

Æ
No. 67667.

#### Albert Godde Bedin, Inc., and Alltransport, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 289396-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon yarn similar in all material respects to- that the subject of Abstract 65138 and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Sternberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 60329.

protests 211682-K and 211683-K (New York).

#### Lilly Dache, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fur hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained as follows: (1) The items marked “A,” consisting of hoods, valued at more than $12 and not more than $15 per dozen, were held dutiable at 47)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1526 (a), as modified, *supra,*and (2) the items marked “B,” *408consisting of hoods, valued at more than $18 and not more than $24 per dozen, were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1526 (a), as modified, *supra.*
Before the Second Division,

December 14, 1966

No. P66/368.

#### Terra International Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States, protests 62/7582, etc. (Los Angeles).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles *837similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman’s*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
 or
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission File Number 001-33103
 CADENCE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
  Delaware
    
    41-2142317(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (I.R.S. Employerof incorporation or organization)
    
    Identification No.)
 12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92130
(858) 436- 1400
  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share
    
    NASDAQ Global Market(Title of class)
    
    (Name of exchange on which registered)
 None
 o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 o þ




---



##### 



Explanatory Note
   Item 15.
    
    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  CADENCE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    /s/ Theodore R. SchroederTheodore R. SchroederPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 52091.

protests 76607-K/90707, etc. (Chicago).

#### International Forwarding Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of record changer and units similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Garrard Sales Corp.*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 369). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

June 25, 1948

No. 52418.

protests 56342-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### James G. Biddle Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          TAL INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
                           2004 MANAGEMENT STOCK PLAN

                                 October 5, 2005

      A.    Background. TAL International Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
(the "Company") has adopted the TAL International Group, Inc. 2004 Management
Stock Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of November 3, 2004. The board of
directors of the Company has approved this First Amendment to the Plan (this
"Amendment"), and the Company's stockholders have approved this Amendment.

      B.    Amendment. Paragraphs (b) and (e) of Section 4.2 of the Plan are
hereby amended and restated in their entirety as follows:

            "(b)  Subject to the following provisions of this subsection 4.2,
                  the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be delivered to
                  Participants and their beneficiaries under the Plan shall
                  equal to 454,612 shares, which amount takes into account any
                  adjustment for the 101.5052-for-1 stock split that will occur
                  immediately prior to the consummation of the Company's initial
                  public offering of Stock."

            "(e)  Subject to paragraph 4.2(f), the maximum number of shares of
                  Stock that may be issued pursuant to Options intended to be
                  ISOs shall equal to 454,612 shares, which amount takes into
                  account any adjustment for the 101.5052-for-1 stock split that
                  will occur immediately prior to the consummation of the
                  Company's initial public offering of Stock."

      C.    Capitalized Terms. All capitalized terms used but not defined in
this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

      D.    Execution. To record the adoption of this Amendment, the Company
has caused its duly authorized officer to affix his name as of the date first
above written.

                            [Signature Page Follows]

                                        TAL INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

                                        By: ____________________________________

                                        Name: __________________________________

                                        Title: _________________________________
```
Case 3:06-cv-05351-RJB Document 8 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-05351-RJB Document 8 Filed 08/23/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-05351-RJB Document 8 Filed 08/23/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-05351-RJB Document 8 Filed 08/23/06 Page 4 of 4
No. 64651.

#### The Coldwater Seafood Corp. and Osan Supply Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/5598 and 59/27961 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62377.

#### Gulf Oil Corp. and J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

protest 318501-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that if the certificate of exportation had been filed prior to the liquidation of the entry or the expiration of the collector’s review period provided for in section 515, the merchandise would have been liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1615, as amended, *supra.*In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 53865, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.