alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 107-23]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-23

======================================================================

 
      PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

   March 20, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 92]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 92, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides that the following measures may be 
considered under suspension of the rules at any time on the 
legislative day of Wednesday, March 21, 2001, or Thursday, 
March 22, 2001:
          (1) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 43) 
        authorizing the printing of a revised and updated 
        version of the House document entitled ``Black 
        Americans in Congress, 1870-1989'';
          (2) The bill (H.R. 1042) to prevent the elimination 
        of certain reports;
          (3) The bill (H.R. 1098) to improve the recording and 
        discharging of maritime liens and expand the American 
        Merchant Marine Memorial Wall of Honor, and for other 
        purposes;
          (4) The bill (H.R. 1099) to make changes in laws 
        governing Coast Guard personnel, increase marine 
        safety, renew certain groups that advise the Coast 
        Guard on safety issues, make miscellaneous improvements 
        to Coast Guard operations and policies, and for other 
        purposes;
          (5) The bill (H.R. 496) to amend the Communications 
        Act of 1934 to promote deployment of advanced services 
        and foster the development of competition for the 
        benefit of consumers in all regions of the Nation by 
        relieving unnecessary burdens on the Nation's two 
        percent local exchange telecommunications carriers, and 
        for other purposes;
          (6) The bill (H.R. 802) to authorize the Public 
        Safety Officer Medal of Valor, and for other purposes.

                                  

```
# L_2022326EN.01005701.xml

| 21.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/57

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2022/2521

of 20 December 2022

correcting the Romanian language version of Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (1), and in particular Article 2(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | As a result of the amendment to Directive 2003/96/EC by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/552 (2) the Romanian language version of Directive 2003/96/EC contains errors in Article 2(1)(h), in the second indent of Article 16(1) and in Article 20(1)(h) as regards the exclusion of anti-rust preparations containing amines as active constituents and inorganic composite solvents and thinners for varnishes and similar products, if these products are intended for use as heating fuel or motor fuel and their components produced from biomass. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

As a result of the amendment to Directive 2003/96/EC by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/552 (2) the Romanian language version of Directive 2003/96/EC contains errors in Article 2(1)(h), in the second indent of Article 16(1) and in Article 20(1)(h) as regards the exclusion of anti-rust preparations containing amines as active constituents and inorganic composite solvents and thinners for varnishes and similar products, if these products are intended for use as heating fuel or motor fuel and their components produced from biomass.

| (2) | The Romanian language version of Directive 2003/96/EC should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Romanian language version of Directive 2003/96/EC should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Excise Duty, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Excise Duty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2022.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 51.

1

(2)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/552 of 6 April 2018 updating the references in Council Directive 2003/96/EC to the codes of the Combined Nomenclature for certain products (OJ L 91, 9.4.2018, p. 27).

2

---
October 19, 1955

No. 59375.

Suit 4818.

#### Murray Block, Temporary Administrator for Estate of Louis S. Fryer *v.*United States.

C. D. 1594 affirmed July 1, 1955. C. A. D. 596.
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, David ONeill, President, Chief Executive
  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Marley Coffee Inc., hereby certifies,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Marley Coffee
        Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of Marley Coffee Inc.                                                                  

Dated: May 15, 2008

|/s/ David ONeill                          | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|David ONeill                              | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer         | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) Chief        | 
|Financial Officer                          | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal | 
|Accounting Officer)                        | 

---
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William R. Stewart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric
Association, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2006

                                        /s/ William R. Stewart
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        William R. Stewart
                                        Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                             PORTER & HEDGES, L.L.P.
                            700 Louisiana, 35th Floor
                            Houston, Texas 77002-2764
                            Telecopier (713) 228-1331
                            Telephone (713) 226-0600


                                  November 7, 1997


First Bank National Association, Trustee
180 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota  55101

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   
     We have acted as counsel to Allied Waste Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Allied"), in connection with the registration under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, of the issuance by Allied of $418 million aggregate
principal amount of 11.30% Senior Discount Notes due 2007 (the "Notes") pursuant
to the Indenture dated May 15, 1997 (the "Indenture") between Allied and you, in
your capacity as trustee under the Indenture (the "Trustee").
    

     In connection with the opinions expressed below, we have examined (i) the
certificates of incorporation, bylaws and corporate proceedings of Allied and
(ii) the Indenture.

     Based upon such examinations, we are of the opinion that the Notes, when
issued, will be: (i) legally issued, fully paid and nonassessable; and (ii)
binding obligations of Allied, except as may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency and other law relating to the rights of creditors and law relating to
specific performance and other forms of equitable relief that are subject to
equitable defenses and judicial authority.

     We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement on Form S-4, No. 333-31231, and to the reference to our firm under the
captioned "Legal Matters" in the prospectus included therein.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ PORTER & HEDGES, L.L.P.

                                        PORTER & HEDGES, L.L.P.
No. 63941.

protest 59/19885 (New York).

#### Petrocelli & Segre, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11.1

Corporate Express, Inc.
Statement Regarding Computation of Net Income Per Share

Primary Earnings Per Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                     Three Months Ended                        Nine Months Ended
                                            -------------------------------------    --------------------------------------
                                              November 29,        November 30,         November 29,         November 30,
                                                  1997                1996                 1997                 1996
                                            -----------------    ----------------    -----------------    -----------------
<S>                                         <C>                  <C>                 <C>                  <C> 
Pro forma net income                          $       14,523       $       8,918       $       39,106       $       33,760
                                            =================    ================    =================    =================
                                            
Pro forma net income per share                $         0.10       $        0.07       $         0.29       $         0.26
                                            =================    ================    =================    =================
                                            
Weighted average shares outstanding                  130,675             123,530              129,122              120,791
                                            
Common Stock Equivalents:                   
       Stock options and warrants                      9,324               7,753                6,810                8,596
                                            -----------------    ----------------    -----------------    -----------------
                                            
Total weighted average shares outstanding            139,999             131,283              135,932              129,387
                                            =================    ================    =================    =================
</TABLE> 

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share

Fully diluted earnings per share differs from primary earnings per share by less
than 3%.
```

                        Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors Navistar
Financial Corporation:

We  have examined  Navistar  Financial  Corporation's (the Company)  compliance
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth  in the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP)as of and for the year ended October 31, 2005, except for items I.2, I.4,
III.1,  III.2,  III.3,  III.4,  III.6,  V.2,  V.3,  V.4, and VII.1,  for  the
servicing  of  receivables  for  the  Navistar  Financial  2005-A  Owner  Trust.
Management  is  responsible  for  the  Company's  compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion  about  the  Company's  compliance  based  on  our  examination.  Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards  established
by the American  Institute of Certified  Public  Accountants,  and accordingly,
included  examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing  standards specified above and performing such other
procedures as we  considered  necessary in the  circumstances.  We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination
does not  provide a  legal  determination  on the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards.

Our  examination  disclosed  the  following  material  noncompliance  with  the
minimum servicing  standards of USAP during the year ended  October 31, 2005.
The Company did not comply with the  requirements  that  custodial  bank account
and related bank clearing  account  reconciliations  be reviewed and approved by
someone other than the person who prepared the  reconciliation, and that they be
prepared  within 45 days after the cutoff date as  specified  in items I.1.b and
I.1.c in USAP's minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the preceding
paragraph,  the Company complied with the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing
standards  as of and for the year ended  October  31,  2005,  in all  material
respects.

                                               \s\ KPMG, LLP

January 31, 2008
```
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 245

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the

bill H.R. 764.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 245

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 764)

3 to amend the Victims of Crime Act of 1984, with respect

4 to certain increases in funds, the Clerk of the House shall

5 make the following corrections:
2

•HCON 245 EH

1 In section 104(a)(1), in the matter amending section

2 1402(d)(2) of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984—

3 (1) strike ‘‘the next’’ the first place it appears

4 and insert ‘‘The first’’; and

5 (2) strike ‘‘the next’’ the second place it ap6 pears and insert ‘‘the first’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 1,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 336 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.336
                                          Agreed to May 25, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 
25, 2000, or Friday, May 26, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 6, 2000, for morning-hour 
debate, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Thursday, May 25, 2000, Friday, May 26, 
2000, Saturday, May 27, 2000, or Sunday, May 28, 2000, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 
June 5, 2000, or Tuesday, June 6, 2000, as may be specified by its 
Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
at such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority 
Leader or his designee in the motion, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 25, 2016

p0414

Order 

Clerk

April 25, 2016

151601 & (23)(28)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151601

COA: 323688

Wayne CC: 11-003355-FC

QUAN DORSEY, 11-003356-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 11-003357-FC 11-003361-FC

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motions to remand and for summary disposition are DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 28, 2013

No. 04

- 13

- 00545

- CV

IN RE RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC.

and Ryder Integrated Logistics of Texas, LLC

Original Mandamus Pro ceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On August 27, 2013 real parties in interest Denise Molina and George Duzane, co

conservators of Rafael “Ralph” Molina, and Rafael “Ralph” Moli na, filed an unopposed motion

for extension of time to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. The motion is

GRANTED. A response on behalf of the real parties in interest is due to this court on or before

September 27, 2013.

It is so OR DERED on August 28, 2013

. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- CI

- 03779, styled Denise Molina and George Duzane, Co

conservators of Rafael “Ralph” Molina and Rafael “Ralph” Molina v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al.

, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.