alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40306 Summary Calendar

EDUARDO M. BENAVIDES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RUDY SANEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-G-90-B

- - - - - - - - - - November 19, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eduardo M. Benavides, Texas prisoner # 378878, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of the denial of his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) following the dismissal of his civil rights action. By moving for IFP, Benavides is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.No.95-40306 -2- 1997). Because Benavides has not demonstrated that he will raise

a nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Benavides is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals or pleadings filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Benavides should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134201 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134201 

 COA: 274637 

Genesee CC: 99-005195-FC 

KEITH CORNELL STINSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
PUBLIC LAW 111–89—OCT. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 2975 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1929: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Oct. 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Oct. 28, considered and passed House, amended. 

Oct. 29, Senate concurred in House amendment. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–89 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as most recently amended by section 1 of Public 

Law 111–66, is amended by striking ‘‘October 31, 2009’’ each place 

it appears and inserting ‘‘January 31, 2010’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on October 30, 2009. 

Approved October 30, 2009. 

Oct. 30, 2009 

[S. 1929] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
No. 57835.

protest 216594-K (New York).

#### China Korean Export Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*403Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
No. 59858.

#### Atlas Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 23461-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) and that the items marked “B” consist of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 65262.

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/17441 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT 10.3


Change of Control Agreement between Premier Bancorp, Inc., Premier Bank and John
J. Ginley (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 13, 1998).

                                       34

<PAGE>
Before the First Division,

October 15, 1953

No. 57531.

#### Walco Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 155004-K, etc. (New York).

*260Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Christmas tree ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>			5

<MULTIPLIER>		1

       

<S>					<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>			6-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			MAR-31-1997

<PERIOD -END>				SEP-30-1996

<CASH>						        17

<SECURITIES>					          0

<RECEIVABLES>					          0

<ALLOWANCES>					          0

<INVENTORY>					          0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>				 81,350

<PP&E>						           0 

<DEPRECIATION>					          0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>					 81,350

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>				 97,016

<BONDS>						          0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>			          0

<PREFERRED>					          0

<COMMON>						    1,000

<OTHER-SE>					 (16,666)

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		  81,350

<SALES>						          0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>				          0

<CGS>						          0

<TOTAL-COSTS>					          0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>				      250

<LOSS-PROVISION>				          0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>				          0

<INCOME-PRETAX>				     (250)

<INCOME-TAX>					          0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>				     (250)

<DISCONTINUED>					          0

<EXTRAORDINARY>				          0

<CHANGES>					          0

<NET-INCOME>					     (250)

<EPS-PRIMARY>					        .00

<EPS-DILUTED>					        .00

        


</TABLE>
**1996-  potato_stocks_12.16.96potato_stocks_05.14.96potato_stocks_04.12.96potato_stocks_03.14.96potato_stocks_02.14.96potato_stocks_01.16.96

**
Case No. 13,000.

#### SMITH v. ALLYN.

[See Case No. 13,064.]
Before the Second Division,

March 9, 1960

No. 63932.

protests 59/4982, etc. (New York).

#### Wilkinson Publishing Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of gift tags, composed wholly or in chief value of paper, lithographically printed, not over twelve one-thousandths of an inch in thickness, which are not gift or social cards, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SemiLEDs Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)the Amendment No. 1 to the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

| Dated: December 27, 2016 | /s/ Christopher Lee            |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                     | Name: Christopher Lee          |
|                     | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
- Submit Content
        - |
        - Contact Us
        - |
        -   Help

HomeSearch ERIC
Basic SearchAdvanced SearchSearch the Thesaurus
Our Collection
About the ERIC CollectionJournals Indexed in ERICNon-Journal Source ListFeatured PublicationsCollection Statistics
Thesaurus
About the ERIC ThesaurusSearch & Browse the ThesaurusMaintaining the ERIC Thesaurus
About Us
About the ERIC ProgramNewsSteering CommitteeContent ExpertsLibrary CommitteeERIC Collection Development ProcessPolicy StatementsContact Us
My ERIC
LoginRegister to Use My ERIC
No. 53835.

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 147105-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When this case was called for trial there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. An examination of the collector’s letter *315disclosed that the regulations were not complied with. In view of the noncompliance with the mandatory regulations, the protest was overruled, following *Maple Leaf Petroleum, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 5, T. D. 48976).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      $1,391,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,695,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,022,297
<PP&E>                                      16,092,985
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,013,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,917,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,486,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         87
<COMMON>                                       113,570
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,081,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,917,245
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,022,502
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,565,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                373,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (300,818)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   445,755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
 
        

</TABLE>
PRESERVATION PRINCIPLES

Ebey's Prairie

Location and Access

Ebey's Prairie is located in the central portion of the reserve, surrounded by the Coastal Strip on the southwest, the West

Woodlands, Coupeville and Highway 20 along the north, and the East Woodlands.

The large natural prairie is characterized by a gentle sweep of agricultural land and a patchwork of farms, fields, fences and

hedgerows.

Primary access is along Highway 20, Ebey's Landing Road, Engle Road, and Hill Road.

Significance and Integrity

From the very earliest use by the Skagit Indians and subsequent settlement by white pioneers, the prairie land has been used for

agriculture. Taking advantage of the open fields and fertile soils, early donation land claims by the Ebeys, Engles, Hills and

others solidified settlement patterns on the prairie. Many of these claims remain remarkably intact today.

Early homes from this initial period of settlement are still standing in their original location (including the Jacob Ebey Saltbox,

1855), and are historically significant structures on the reserve. Other structures, including the cemetery, several barns and

outbuildings, roads, and fencelines have remained the same for over a hundred years and reflect this same period of early

settlement. Taken altogether, the stability and continuity of these broad patterns of settlement and land use, circulation, and

structures, reflect a high degree of both natural landscape integrity and the history of a still-vital community.

The sheep barn on the bluff overlooking the prairie was probably part of Jacob Ebey's homestead (top, right).

The Gould house built in 1896 (bottom, right).

Preservation Principles

Preservation principles for Ebey's Prairie focus on protection of significant historic landscape patterns and features.

1. Protect both natural soils, historic landscape patterns and structures by maintaining an exclusive agricultural land use

designation for the entire prairie.

2. New development or structures not associated with existing complexes should be carefully sited along the edges of the

prairie (see #3 below).

3. In order to preserve the high degree of visual quality on the prairie, no structures, other than interpretive devices of smallscale, should be allowed on the bottom lands. Structures on the slopes should not intrude into the prairie or into the

skyline when seen from local roads or viewpoints.

4. Maintenance and incorporation of existing fence lines and hedgerows into current land practices is strongly encouraged.

NEXT>>> Crockett Prairie

http://www.nps.gov/ebla/rcl/rcl6g.htm

Last Updated: 07-Jun-2000

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve

Reading the Cultural Landscape

Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve: Reading the Cultural Landscape Page 1 of 1

http://web.archive.org/web/20080531043844/http://www.nps.gov/archive/ebla/rcl/rcl6g.htm 11/29/2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald W. Hultgren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 35

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 14, 1999

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the State of Qatar and its citizens for their

commitment to democratic ideals and women’s suffrage

on the occasion of Qatar’s historic elections of a central

municipal council on March 8, 1999.

Whereas His Highness, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani,

the Emir of Qatar, issued a decree creating a central municipal council, the first of its kind in Qatar;

Whereas on March 8, 1999, the people of the State of Qatar

held direct elections for a central municipal council;
2

HCON 35 RFS

Whereas the central municipal council has been structured to

have members from 29 election districts serving 4-year

terms;

Whereas Qatari women were granted the right to participate

in this historic first municipal election, both as candidates and voters;

Whereas this election demonstrates the strength and diversity

of the State of Qatar’s commitment to democratic expression;

Whereas the United States highly values democracy and

women’s rights;

Whereas March 8 is recognized as International Women’s

Day, and is an occasion to assess the progress of the advancement of women and girls throughout the world; and

Whereas this historic event of democratic elections and women’s suffrage in the State of Qatar should be honored:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends His Highness, Sheikh Hamad

4 bin Khalifa al-Thani, the Emir of Qatar, for his

5 leadership and commitment to suffrage and the prin6 ciples of democracy;

7 (2) congratulates the citizens of the State of

8 Qatar as they celebrate the historic election for a

9 central municipal council; and

10 (3) reaffirms that the United States is strongly

11 committed to encouraging the suffrage of women,
3

HCON 35 RFS

1 democratic ideals, and peaceful development

2 throughout the Middle East.

Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 343

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

importance of families eating together.

Whereas the use and abuse of illegal drugs, nicotine, and alcohol are the greatest threat to the health and well-being

of American children;

Whereas parental influence is one of the most crucial factors

in determining the likelihood of teenage substance abuse;

Whereas family dinners have long been a pillar of American

family life;
2

HCON 343 RFS

Whereas the correlation between the frequency of family dinners and the risk of substance abuse is well documented;

Whereas surveys conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University have

found, for each of the past 4 years, that children and

teenagers who routinely eat dinner with their families are

far less likely to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;

Whereas, according to these surveys, teenagers from families

that seldom eat dinner together are 72 percent more likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol, and teenagers from families that eat

dinner together are 31 percent less likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;

Whereas one method for families to eat dinner together more

often would be for them to select a recurring occasion for

doing so, such as the third Monday of each month; and

Whereas a National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-Children Day on

Monday, June 19, 2000, would encourage families to eat

together: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) eating dinner together is a critical step for

4 a family in raising healthy, drug-free children; and
3

HCON 343 RFS

1 (2) a National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-Children

2 Day should be established in order to encourage

3 families to eat together as often as possible.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
August 20, 1957

No. 61168.

Suit 4902.

#### B. K. Elliott Company *v.*United States.

Abstract 60241 reversed June 10, 1957. C. A. D. 659.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         $   369,738
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,821,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,336,865
<PP&E>                                          10,976,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,969,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,283,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,082,475
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         33,050
<COMMON>                                            72,685
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,933,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,283,502
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,672,300
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,644,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (303,739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        32,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (336,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0

        

</TABLE>
No. 67228.

protests 69/27113-15785, etc. (New Orleans).

#### Transamerican Match Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.