alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Li3 Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luis Santillana, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|       | /s/ Luis Santillana     | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|Name:  | Luis Santillana         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date:  | October 15, 2012        |
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 374

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Harriet Tubman should have

been paid a pension for her service as a nurse and scout in the United

States Army during the Civil War.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 2000

Mr. TOWNS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Harriet Tubman

should have been paid a pension for her service as a

nurse and scout in the United States Army during the

Civil War.

Whereas during the Civil War Harriet Tubman reported to

General David Hunter at Hilton Head, South Carolina,

with a letter from Governor John Andrews of Massachusetts allowing her to serve in the Union Army;

Whereas Harriet Tubman served at Hilton Head as a nurse,

scout, spy, and cook;

Whereas in the spring of 1865, Harriet Tubman worked at

the freedman’s hospital in Fortress Monroe, Virginia;

Whereas Harriet Tubman’s last husband, Nelson Davis,

served in the United States Colored Infantry under Cap-
2

•HCON 374 IH

tain James S. Thompson, beginning on September 25,

1863, and was discharged on November 10, 1865;

Whereas Harriet Tubman received a pension as the spouse of

a deceased veteran;

Whereas Harriet Tubman requested a pension for her own

service in the Union Army during the Civil War, but

never received one;

Whereas a bill that passed the House of Representatives in

1897 during the 55th Congress (H.R. 4982) would have

required that Harriet Tubman be placed on the pension

roll of the United States for her service as a nurse in the

United States Army and paid a pension at the rate of

$25 each month instead of all other pensions;

Whereas some females who served in the military during the

Civil War received a pension for their service, including

Sarah Emma Edmonds Seelye and Albert Cashier, each

of whom posed as a male; and

Whereas Harriet Tubman died of pneumonia on March 10,

1913, and was buried at Fort Hill Cemetery in Auburn,

New York, with military honors: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress recognizes that Harriet Tub4 man served as a nurse and scout in the United

5 States Army during the Civil War; and

6 (2) it is the sense of the Congress that Harriet

7 Tubman should have been paid a pension at the rate
3

•HCON 374 IH

1 of $25 each month for her service in the United

2 States Army.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-K of NCI, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, to the best of her knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    JUDITH L. BJORNAAS                                                         
|                    |  |  |  | Judith L. Bjornaas                                                                
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|                    | 

A signed original of the written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Peter Toscano, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of International Power Group, Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date:  November 3, 2006 /s/ Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
No. 55057.

#### A. P. I., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 145057-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 1540^ the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

            Re:   Fremont Home Loan Trust, Series 2005-2
                  Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2
                  ----------------------------------------

            I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

            l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing Distribution Date reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Financial Asset
Securities Corp. (the "Registrant");

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be
provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement is included in these reports;

            4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and based upon the review
required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in
the report, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement; and

            5. I have disclosed to the Registrant's certified public accountants
all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards in accordance with a review conducted in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
standard as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

            Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated July 1, 2005 (the
"Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among the Registrant as Depositor, Litton
Loan Servicing L.P. as servicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as
trustee.

                                    FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                    By: /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Robert McGinnis
                                        Title: President
                                        Date: March 30, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 389 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 389

 Supporting the goals and ideas of National Take Your Kids To Vote Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

  Mrs. Morella (for herself, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Davis of 
  Virginia, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. 
   Blagojevich, Mr. Tauzin, Mr. Costello, Mr. Frost, Mr. Pastor, Mr. 
   Kleczka, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Carson, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Lantos, Mr. 
Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Cummings, Mrs. Jones 
 of Ohio, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Bonior, Ms. McKinney, Mrs. Maloney of New 
 York, Mrs. Capps, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Castle, Mr. Maloney of Connecticut, 
Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Engel, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Dicks, and Mr. 
   Gilman) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideas of National Take Your Kids To Vote Day.

Whereas voting is a civic duty and critical to democracy;
Whereas voting participation rates in the United States for all age groups have 
        fallen dramatically since 1972;
Whereas voting participation rates are lower among young voters;
Whereas only 32 percent of individuals in the range of 18 through 24 years of 
        age voted in the last Presidential election;
Whereas large numbers of young people feel disconnected from government;
Whereas many younger adults report that they do not know how to vote;
Whereas, according to a 1996 study by the Bureau of the Census, children are far 
        more likely to vote when they become adults if their parents voted;
Whereas parents should talk to their children about the importance of voting;
Whereas a number of businesses and organizations have designated November 7, 
        2000, as National Take Your Kids To Vote Day in order to encourage 
        people to vote; and
Whereas many Americans will go to the polls on November 7, 2000, to elect a new 
        President and a new Congress: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideas of National Take Your Kids 
        To Vote day;
            (2) encourages all voting eligible parents with children 
        who are younger than 18 years of age to talk to their children 
        about the importance of voting and, if possible, take their 
        children to the polls; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to promote 
        voting as a family tradition.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 10585)

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1019295, etc.

(Decided September 10, 1963)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John TV. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “B” and initialed WR (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner W. Rippner (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A” annexed.

> 2. That the merchandise was imported on or after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and is not identified on the Pinal List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) ; and accordingly, appraisement was made under the provisions of Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by said Customs Simplification Act.

> 3. That on or about the dates of exportation of the involved merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, were equal to the appraised values, less the item described on the invoices as “buying commissionthat said prices included the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States.

> *3744. That the appeals enumerated on said 'Schedule “A” may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less the item described on the invoices as buying commission.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before Judge Donlon,

May 10, 1967

No. R67/72.

#### International Packers, Limited *v.*United States,

reapraisements R60/13630, etc. (San Juan).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the *918Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for tbe determination of the value of the canned meat exported from Argentina, during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1959, and that such values are the respective appraised values less the amount in Argentine pesos for retention, as stated in the invoices, for the respective products described in the invoices and as stated in each entry covered by the appeals for reappraisement.
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBIT 5


                                                               November 14, 1997


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: HYPERCOM CORPORATION NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Hypercom Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with its Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") filed under the Securities Act of 1933,
relating to the registration of 93,750 shares of its Common Stock, $.001 par
value (the "Shares"), issuable pursuant to the Company's Nonemployee Directors'
Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").

         In that connection,  we are of the opinion that:

         1.       The Company has been duly organized and is validly existing as
                  a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware.

         2.       The Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms
                  of the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid, and
                  nonassessable.

        In rendering this opinion, we have reviewed and relied upon such
documents and records of the Company as we have deemed necessary and have
assumed the following:

                (i)     the genuineness of all signatures and the authenticity
of documents submitted to us as originals, and the conformity to originals of
all documents submitted to us as copies;

                (ii)    the accuracy, completeness, and genuineness of all
representations and certifications, with respect to factual matters, made to us
by officers of the Company and public officials; and

                (iii)   the accuracy and completeness of Company records.

        The opinions expressed herein are limited solely to the laws of the
State of Delaware. We express no opinion on the laws of any other jurisdiction
or principles of conflicts of law and assume no responsibility for the
applicability or effect of any such laws or principles.

        The opinions expressed herein are based upon the law and other matters
in effect on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to revise or
supplement this opinion should such law be changed by legislative action,
judicial decision, or otherwise, or should any facts or other matters upon
which we have relied be changed.

         We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.


                                        7
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE IN CASE NO. 

CR06-0191-RSL 

Page 1 of 2 

 

 

1 

3 

5 

7 

9 

11 

13 

15 

17 

19 

21 

23 

25 

27 

29 

31 

33 

35 

37 

39 

41 

43 

45 

47 

49 

 

CHIEF JUDGE LASNIK 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CHRISTOPHER ACOBA, and 

MARISSA GOODMAN, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CR06-0191-RSL 

ORDER CONTINUING 

TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS 

CUTOFF DATE 

ORDER

 The Court having considered the defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial Date 

and Pretrial Motions’ Deadline, hereby finds: 

 A continuance is necessary for effective trial preparation, taking into account the exercise 

of due diligence. See Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). Both defendants 

have filed speedy trial waivers through September 26, 2006. 

 The ends of justice served by continuing the trial date to September 12, 2006 outweigh 

the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. See Title 18, United States 

Code, Section 3161(h)(8)(A). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the time within which pretrial motions must be filed 

Case 2:06-cr-00191-BHS Document 42 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 2
 

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE IN CASE NO. 

CR06-0191-RSL 

Page 2 of 2 

 

 

1 

3 

5 

7 

9 

11 

13 

15 

17 

19 

21 

23 

25 

27 

29 

31 

33 

35 

37 

39 

41 

43 

45 

47 

49 

 

is extended to August 11, 2006 and the trial date is extended from August 14, 2006 to September 

12, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the time period between August 14, 2006 and 

September 12, 2006 is excludable time, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), for the purposes 

of computing the time limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161-3174. 

DONE this 25th day of July, 2006. 

A

Robert S. Lasnik 

United States District Judge

 

Presented by: 

Catherine Chaney, WSBA No. 21405 

Attorney for Christopher Acoba 

Robert Gombiner, WSBA No. 16059 

Attorney for Marissa Goodman 

 

Case 2:06-cr-00191-BHS Document 42 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 67674.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 321053-K/9203, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the cartage charges exacted were in excess of the reasonable rates and that the competitive rates were usual and reasonable, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained, and the collector was directed to refund the overcharges. *United States*v. *Davies Turner*& *Company*(48 CCPA 159, C.A.D. 784), followed.