alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 332

Expressing the sense of the Congress with regard to providing humanitarian

aid to cyclone victims in the Indian State of Orissa.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2000

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with regard to providing humanitarian aid to cyclone victims in the Indian

State of Orissa.

Whereas on October 17 and 29, 1999, cyclones struck the Indian State of Orissa, killing more than 10,000 people and

destroying more than 7 million houses, leaving uncounted

millions homeless;

Whereas Orissa is the second poorest State in India;

Whereas more than 80 percent of the rural population of

Orissa are subsistence farmers and fishermen with fewer

than two acres of land;

Whereas in the immediate aftermath of the storm, the United

States Agency for International Development (USAID) of

the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance provided $3.3
2

•HCON 332 IH

million in relief aid and $4.1 million in emergency food

aid through the American private volunteer organizations

Cooperative Assistance for Relief Everywhere (CARE)

and Catholic Relief Services;

Whereas the government of Orissa did not declare an emergency and refused offerings from the United States Embassy in New Delhi to provide air lifts and emergency humanitarian rations;

Whereas assistance from United Nations agencies has been

restricted to rehabilitation, which is largely unfounded;

Whereas additional assistance has been provided by the

United Kingdom, European Union, the Canadian Government, and others and this combined assistance has not

been adequate to meet the needs of the people of Orissa;

Whereas a recent nutritional survey conducted in Orissa by

CARE found that 60 to 70 percent of children under five

years old in several of the cyclone-affected areas are moderately to severely malnourished;

Whereas the CARE survey teams were unable to find people

over 60 years old because nearly all people in this age

range in the surveyed villages were killed in the storm or

its aftermath;

Whereas there is no comprehensive plan or funding for meeting the needs of the cyclone survivors with respect to

housing reconstruction, agricultural support, medical

care, education, and nutrition supplementation; and

Whereas these factors make it likely that the rural poor of

Orissa will migrate to cities and overwhelm the already

limited social services available in this region: Now,

therefore, be it
3

•HCON 332 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Administration, through the United States Agency for

4 International Development, make available to American

5 private volunteer organizations and United Nations agen6 cies an additional $50 million a year for the next two

7 years, to mitigate the effects of the cyclones that have dev8 astated the poorest people in the second poorest State in

9 India.

Æ
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald W.
Hultgren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /S/    DONALD W. HULTGREN                 
|                        |  |  |  |                                           
|                        |  |  |  | Donald W. Hultgren Chief Executive Officer
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 377

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted

the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 2000

Ms. KAPTUR submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court

misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution

in the case of Buckley v. Valeo.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Su3 preme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the

4 Constitution in its decision in the 1976 case of Buckley

5 v. Valeo because—

6 (1) the decision failed to recognize that the un7 limited spending of large amounts of money on elec8 tions has a corrosive effect on the electoral process

9 not simply because of direct transactions between

10 those who give large amounts of money and can-
2

•HCON 377 IH

1 didates and elected officials but because the presence

2 of unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process

3 on a more fundamental level; and

4 (2) the decision failed to recognize other legiti5 mate state interests which justify limiting money in

6 campaigns, including the need to preserve the integ7 rity of our republican form of government, restore

8 public confidence in government, and ensure all citi9 zens a more equal opportunity to participate in the

10 political process.

Æ
No. 55704.

protests 156491-K, etc. (New York).

#### Devoe-Raynolds Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 53362.

protests 92455-K, etc. (New York).

#### Barrie Morell & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.
No. 56190.

protests 801042-G, etc. (New York).

#### The Attorney General as Successor to The Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 58365.

protest 148834-K (Buffalo).

#### National Lead Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of zinc the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *M. W. Zack Metal Company*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 91, C. D. 1306), which the court held to be classifiable under paragraph 397 as articles in chief value of zinc, not specially provided for. However, inasmuch as the plaintiff in the cited case did not claim classification under paragraph 397, the protest therein was overruled without affirming the collector’s classification. On the record presented herein, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 9,569.

#### MILLER v. EVANS.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 72.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1813.

Payment — Bonds—Lapse of Time — Presumption.

In an action upon a bond, payable by instal-ments, the jury may, and ought to, presume payment of any instalment payable more than twenty years before the commencement of the suit, and may presume payment of an instalment payable nineteen years and ten months before suit brought.

Debt upon a bond payable by instalments. Nineteen years and ten months elapsed since the last instalment became payable, and another instalment had-become payable more than twenty years before the suit was brought.

N. Herbert, for plaintiff.

Mr. Taylor, for defendant.

1

.[Reported by Hon. William Crunch, Chief Judge.)

THE COURT

(nem. con.) instructed the jury that as to the instalment due more than twenty years they ought to presume, and as to the other they might presume, payment.
No. 63939.

protest 59/19172 (New York).

#### Trans-World Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after

liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 9, 2005 |  | /S/ Kenneth R. Hanks   
|                       |  | Kenneth R. Hanks       
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer

|
|

|
|
No. P68/85.

protest 65/5770 (Detroit).

#### Fischer Bearings Mfg. Co. and J. D. Richardson Co. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of water pump spindle bearings, used as parts of internal-combustion engines of the carburetor type, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Ford Motor Company*(51 CCPA 22, C.A.D. 831), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66653.

#### Louis Goldey *v.*United States,

protests 288141-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise, manufactured by P.E.L.V., consist of opal glass tile or tiling, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55049.

protest 133118-K/1258 (Chicago).

#### Gallagher & Ascher Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of sawed dagame lumber similar in all material respects to that the subject of *John A. Hunter Hardwood Corp.*v. *United States (21*Cust. Ct. 139, C. D. 1143), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350

 

I, Stephanie Bowman, the Chief Financial Officer of Tuesday Morning Corporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tuesday Morning Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tuesday Morning Corporation.

 

 
| Date:   January 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/   Stephanie Bowman                       |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Stephanie   Bowman   Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      51,378,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,951,742
<PP&E>                                      11,911,273
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,723,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,143,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,495,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,953
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,715,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,143,115
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,682,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,828,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,828,475)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,828,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                            INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

                                  June 26, 1997


Starwood Lodging Corporation
2231 East Camelback Road, Suite 400
Phoenix, Arizona 85016

                  Re:      Indemnification Agreement

Gentlemen:

                  Please refer to the Indemnification Agreement (the
"Agreement") dated as of March 1, 1996, and Amendment No. 1 to
Indemnification Agreement ("Amendment No. 1"), each between Starwood Lodging
Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the "Corporation") and the undersigned.

                  Defined terms used herein have the same meaning as in the
Agreement.

                  The Agreement as previously amended and clarified is hereby
further amended and clarified as follows (paragraph numbers below correspond to
the Article or Section numbers of the Agreement affected by that paragraph):

                  2. The obligation to indemnify set forth in Article 2 of the
Agreement is intended to include the obligation to advance expenses to
Indemnitee.

                  4. The first paragraph of Article 4 of the Agreement is
without limitation on the provisions of Article 2 of the Agreement.

                  5. The exceptions to the indemnification obligations under
Article 3 and the expense advance obligations under Article 4, as set forth in
subparagraphs (a) through (f) of Article 5, are subject to any contrary
determination by a court of competent jurisdiction.

                  11. The reference to Article 4 in Section 11 (a)(i) and the
reference to Article 3 in Section 11(b) shall be deemed to include in each case
a reference to Article 2 as well.

                                Yours very truly,



AGREED TO:

Starwood Lodging Corporation.
a Maryland corporation


By:______________________________

Its:_____________________________
Exhibit 10.39

            CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
                   WITH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        ASTERISKS DENOTE SUCH OMISSION









           AMENDMENT 1 TO THE PATENT AND KNOW HOW LICENSE AGREMENT


This Amendment Number 1 to the Patent and Know How Agreement (the "Amendment")
is entered into the 24th day of May, 2002 among Nortec Development Associates
Inc. and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Nortec and Par agreed to develop,
supply, and distribute ********** ** (******** **(R)).

Whereby, Nortec and Par wish to amend Section 1.5 of the agreement "Net Sales"
to include the following deductions: charge-back rebates and state or federal
Medicare or Medicaid rebates.


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

 /s/ Oliver W. Mueller
---------------------------------------

NORTEC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.

               05/31/02
DATE:
      -------------------------------



AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

 /s/ Paul Campanelli
-------------------------------------

PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.

               05/29/02
DATE:
      -------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 24 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.24
                                        Agreed to April 12, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

Whereas at the heart of the Oslo peace process lies the basic, 
  irrevocable commitment made by Palestinian Chairman Yasir Arafat 
  that, in his words, ``all outstanding issues relating to permanent 
  status will be resolved through negotiations'';

Whereas resolving the political status of the territory controlled by 
  the Palestinian Authority while ensuring Israel's security is one of 
  the central issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict;

Whereas a declaration of statehood by the Palestinians outside the 
  framework of negotiations would, therefore, constitute a most 
  fundamental violation of the Oslo process;

Whereas Yasir Arafat and other Palestinian leaders have repeatedly 
  threatened to declare unilaterally the establishment of a Palestinian 
  state;

Whereas the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state would 
  introduce a dramatically destabilizing element into the Middle East, 
  risking Israeli countermeasures, a quick descent into violence, and 
  an end to the entire peace process; and

Whereas, in light of continuing statements by Palestinian leaders, 
  United States opposition to any unilateral Palestinian declaration of 
  statehood should be made clear and unambiguous: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
        (1) the final political status of the territory controlled by 
    the Palestinian Authority can only be determined through 
    negotiations and agreement between Israel and the Palestinian 
    Authority;
        (2) any attempt to establish Palestinian statehood outside the 
    negotiating process will invoke the strongest congressional 
    opposition; and
        (3) the President should unequivocally assert United States 
    opposition to the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state, 
    making clear that such a declaration would be a grievous violation 
    of the Oslo accords and that a declared state would not be 
    recognized by the United States.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Case No. 8,284.

#### Ex parte LETTY.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 328.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1806.

Slavery — Petition- for Freedom — Habeas Corpus-Security.

A petitioner for freedom, in custody, will not be discharged upon the request of the master, unless ' upon security given by him to have the petitioner forthcoming, &c., to prosecute a claim for freedom.

Habeas corpus upon the petition of a man claiming to be the master of the negro Letty, committed to jail by a magistrate, upon a complaint made that she was entitled to her freedom under the law of Virginia, December 25, 1795 (Rev. Code 1803, p. 346).

Mr. Youngs, for her master,

contended that the justice had not stated that the master failed or refused to give bond. That her title to freedom must be proved, by legal evidence, before she can be detained against the will of the master. The negro had been confined in jail in Washington, and, while in jail there, was sold by B. G. Orr to Henry Dawes, of Georgetown, by him brought to Alexandria, and sold to Dozier, of South Carolina. She had petitioned for her freedom in Washington county, where the petition was still pending.

Mr. Hiort, for prisoner,

filed a petition praying that she may be protected from being removed out of the district, until her petition for freedom can be heard in Washington.

THE COURT,

after consideration, refused to suffer the master to take the negro away, unless upon giving security not to take her out of the District of Columbia, &c., according to the Maryland practice, and remanded her.