alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

February 17, 2009

Mr. Jon Macey

Acting Corporate Controller
CIT

One CIT Drive, 2145-1
Livingston, New Jersey 07039

Dear Mr. Macey:

This letter is in response to the request by CIT Group Inc. (“CIT”),
New York, New York, for relief from the Board’s regulatory reporting
requirements for bank holding companies (“BHCs”) for year-end 2008.

You have requested that the Board grant CIT temporary relief from the
regulatory reporting requirements for BHCs to allow CIT time to develop a
compliant regulatory reporting system. Specifically, you have requested relief
from filing a number of regulatory reports for the December 31, 2008, reporting
date, except that you have committed to file the December 31, 2008, FR Y-9C and
FR Y-9LP reports by the filing deadline of February 17, 2009, and have requested
confidential treatment of those reports. You also have requested until
March 1, 2009, to file CIT’s initial FR Y-10 reports.

Based on all the facts of record, including the information provided in your
request and other supervisory information, the Director of the Division of Banking
Supervision and Regulation, with the concurrence of the General Counsel, acting
under delegated authority, has granted CIT’s request for certain relief from the
Board’s regulatory reporting requirements for year-end 2008. CIT is exempt from
filing all BHC regulatory reports for the December 31, 2008, reporting date, with
the exception of CIT’s FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP reports, which CIT must file on a
best efforts basis by the filing deadline of February 17, 2009. In addition, the
filing deadline for its initial FR Y-10 reports is extended to March 1, 2009.
Although the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP reports are required to be submitted
electronically, CIT may manually (not electronically) submit these reports for the
December 31, 2008, reporting date to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York by
the filing deadline. Robust footnote disclosures should be used to identify


significant issues or deviations from the reporting requirements in both the
FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP reports. The December 31, 2008, FR Y-9C and
FR Y-9LP reports will be granted confidential treatment.

The Federal Reserve is aware of the magnitude and complexity of the work
that CIT must perform to develop the reporting systems that comply with the
regulatory reporting requirements for BHCs. In this light, CIT has been granted a
substantial exemption from the Board’s year-end 2008 reporting requirements to
ensure that your organization will continue to devote the necessary resources to
become fully compliant with these requirements as soon as possible.

Please contact William Kelly of the New York Reserve Bank at
(212) 720-2165 if you have any questions.

Sincerely yours,

fUetdev. Tue

Robert deV. Frierson
Deputy Secretary of the Board

cc: William Kelly, Supervising Examiner
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
AO 247 (Rev. 11/11) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the 

Western District of Washington 

United States of America 

)

)

)

)

)

)

v. 

Carlos Romallis Daniels 

Case No: CR06-5350RBL 

USM No: 36526-086 

Date of Original Judgment: 10/19/07 

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: Richard Troberman 

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

 Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has 

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 

and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: 

DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in

the last judgment issued) of 168 months is reduced to 135 months .

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 10/19/2007 shall remain in effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: 12/05/2014 

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: 11/01/2015 The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton, U.S. District Judge 

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

A

Case 3:06-cr-05350-RBL Document 151 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Patrick G. LePore, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





*This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
      Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
      such
      filing.*





/s/
      Patrick G. LePore


Patrick
      G. LePore


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


December
      20, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 427 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 427

  Directing the Clerk of the House to correct the enrollment of H.R. 
                                 2415.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 2000

 Mr. Mr. Sessions submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the Clerk of the House to correct the enrollment of H.R. 
                                 2415.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2415) entitled ``An Act to 
enhance security of United States missions and personnel overseas, to 
authorize appropriations for the Department of State for fiscal year 
2000, and for other purposes'', the Clerk of the House shall make the 
following corrections:
            (1) Amend section 1(a) of the bill to read as follows:
    ``(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the `The Gekas-
Grassley Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2000.' ''.
            (2) Strike ``Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2000'' each place it 
        appears throughout the bill and insert ``Gekas-Grassley 
        Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
August 8, 2016

Mr. Erick Larsen

Helicinecam, Inc.

262 W Linden Avenue #C

Burbank, CA 91502-2557

Re: FAA–2016–0394

Dear Mr. Larsen:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
Opinion issued January 10, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 5
- 01113
- CV

——————————— JUAN LORENZO GONZALE Z AND MALISSA MOORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND O F J.G., J.G., J.G. A ND A.G., MINORS , Appellant s V
. R EGULATORY CONSULTANTS, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 28 1 s t District Court

Harri s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20 1 3
- 724 1 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION A ppellant s , Juan Lorenzo Gonzalez and Malissa Moore, Individually and as Next Friend of J.G., J.G., J.G. and A.G., Minors, h a ve filed a n unopposed motion
to dismiss this appeal . Appellants state that they no longer wish to pursue this appeal and further request that all costs be assessed against the party incurring the2

same. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1), (d). N o other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued

. See id. 42.1 (a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal , with costs to be taxed against the party who incurred the same

. See id. 42.1(a)(1) , (d), 43.2(f)

. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Higley, and Lloyd

.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Milton G. Silva-Craig., the Chief Executive Officer of Technology Solutions Company,certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Technology Solutions Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 14, 2007 By: /s/ MILTON G. SILVA-CRAIG Milton G. Silva-Craig      Chief Executive Officer  
* *
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.51

                        [FORRESTER RESEARCH LETTERHEAD]

                               February 15, 2000

Telocity, Inc.
10355 North De Anza Boulevard
Cupertino, California 95014

     RE:  Use of Corporate Name in Prospectus
          -----------------------------------

To whom it may concern:

     We make reference to your request for permission to include our corporate
name in Telocity's prospectus. Telocity has filed a Registration Statement with
the Securities Exchange Commission (the "SEC") to register its shares for an
initial public offering. You have sought our consent to include statistics
obtained from our company as part of your prospectus.

     We hereby consent to the use of our corporate name in Telocity's
prospectus.


                                        /s/ BETH ANN GAVIN
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Name: Beth Ann Gavin
                                        Title: PR Specialist
# L_2022190EN.01013901.xml

| 19.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/139 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/139

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2022/1243

of 18 July 2022

implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (1), and in particular Article 6(1) and (3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP.

| (2) | Further to an evaluation of the relevant circumstances, one entry should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Decision 2012/642/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Further to an evaluation of the relevant circumstances, one entry should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Decision 2012/642/CFSP.

| (3) | Decision 2012/642/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2012/642/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex I to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 18 July 2022.

For the Council

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The following entry is deleted from the list set out in Section B (‘Legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 4(1)’) of Annex I to Decision 2012/642/CFSP:

| ‘23. | Cham Wings Airlines’. |
| --- | --- |

‘23.

Cham Wings Airlines’.

---
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 50 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 28
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 50

                          [Report No. 106-62]

    Authorizing the 1999 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
      Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1999

Mr. Franks of New Jersey submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

                             March 16, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
    Authorizing the 1999 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
      Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On June 11, 1999, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 1999 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District 
of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, and 
solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.




                                                  House Calendar No. 28

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 50

                          [Report No. 106-62]

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Authorizing the 1999 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
      Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 16, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
# L_2022177EN.01007501.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/75

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2022/1105

of 15 June 2022

on the acceptance of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam’s contribution to the European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (EUTM RCA/2/2022)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38, third paragraph, thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/610 of 19 April 2016 on a European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2016/610, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of proposed contributions by third States to EUTM RCA. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2016/610, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of proposed contributions by third States to EUTM RCA.

| (2) | Following the recommendations of the EU Mission Commander and of the European Union Military Committee regarding a contribution from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the contribution from that third State should be accepted and considered to be significant. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the recommendations of the EU Mission Commander and of the European Union Military Committee regarding a contribution from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the contribution from that third State should be accepted and considered to be significant.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The contribution from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to the European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   The Socialist Republic of Vietnam is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUTM RCA.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2022.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

D. PRONK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 104, 20.4.2016, p. 21.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 2, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128224 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128224 

 COA: 250509 

Baraga CC: 03-000818-FH

LANGSTON LONNELL ROGERS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in 

light of People v Russell, 471 Mich 182 (2004). 

s1026 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 2, 2005 

Clerk