alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

 

Section 906 Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital Fund, L.P.

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral_________________________________

Name: Brenda G. Gujral

Title: President of the General Partner and

          Principal Executive Officer of InLand Capital Fund, L.P

Date: May 12, 2003
<PAGE>   1
SHOPKO STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 12 - STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       First Quarter Ended
                                                  ---------------------------------
                                                     May 5,          April 29,
                                                      2001             2000
                                                  (13 Weeks)        (13 Weeks)
                                                  ---------------------------------
<S>    <C>                                      <C>              <C>
       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
       --------------------------------------
       COMPUTATION OF (LOSS) EARNINGS

   1   Pretax (loss) earnings from continuing
       operations                               $      (6,742)   $         1,785
   2   Add previously capitalized interest
         amortized during the period                       154               145
   3   Less interest capitalized during
         the period                                        142               412
                                                  -------------    --------------
   4  Total (loss) earnings (sum of lines 1 to         (6,730)             1,518
      3)

       COMPUTATION OF FIXED CHARGES

   5   Interest (1)                                     18,102            14,995
   6   Interest factor in rental expense                 1,712             2,085
                                                  -------------    --------------
   7   Total fixed charges (sum of lines
         5 and 6)                                       19,814            17,080

   8   TOTAL (LOSS) EARNINGS AND
         FIXED CHARGES (LINE 4
         PLUS LINE 7)                           $       13,084   $        18,598
                                                  =============    ==============

   9   Ratio (line 8 divided by line 7)                   0.66              1.09

       (1) Includes capitalized interest
</TABLE>





















                                       28
# Official Journal C 201/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.201.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 201 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 557 July 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.201.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 201

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 557 July 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2012/C 201/01 | Opinion No 3/2012 (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union’s financial interests | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2012/C 201/01

Opinion No 3/2012 (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union’s financial interests

(pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 53366.

protests 111440-K, etc. (New York).

#### Julius Wile Sons & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
32.1



Section
1350 Certification



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OSL Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended August
31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Rothenberg, Chief Executive
Officer and I, Thomas D’Orazio, Vice President and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our my knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|Date: December
    16, 2014 |  | /s/
    Robert H. Rothenberg                      
|--------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                            |  | Robert H. Rothenberg,
    Chief Executive Officer 
|                            |  |                                                   
|Date:
December 16, 2014     |  | /s/
    Thomas D’Orazio                           
|                            |  | Thomas D’Orazio,
    Vice President and Controller



This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank Crivello, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








Date:  March 28, 2012
By:
/s/   Frank CrivelloFrank Crivello

President

(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Doolittle *vs.*The East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railway Company *et al.*

On the hearing of an application for injunction to prevent the erection, by railroad companies, of a bridge on a street in a city across their tracks, the affidavits' being conflicting, especially upon the question whether or not damage would accrue to the complainant by such erection, the chancellor did right t'o refuse the injunction, and there was no abuse of discretion in so refusing.

July 12, 1888.

Injunction. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Ful-' ton superior court. March term, 1888.

Report unnecessary.

J. H. Lumpkin, for plaintiff.

Bacon & Ruthereord, Mynatt & Carter, Calhoun, King & Spalding, J. B Goodwin and J. T. Pendleton, for defendants.

Blandford, Justice.

This was a bill to enjoin the defendants from erecting a 'bridge across the railroad upon a certain street in the city of Atlanta. At the hearing before the chancellor, many •affidavits were submitted. These affidavits were conflicting, especially upon the question of whether or not damage would accrue to the complainant from the erection of the bridge. The chancellor, under the circumstances, refused to grant an injunction. We think the chancellor did right, and that there was no abuse of his discretion in refusing the injunction. ^

Judgment affirmed.
# L_2022096EN.01004701.xml

| 24.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 96/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 96/47

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2106 of 28 September 2021 on supplementing Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility by setting out the common indicators and the detailed elements of the recovery and resilience scoreboard

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 429 of 1 December 2021
  )

In the Annex, on page 90, in the description of indicator 10 ‘Number of participants in education or training’:

for:

‘The indicator shall take into account the number of participants to education (ISCED 0-6, adult learning) and training (off-the-job/in-the-job training, continuous vocational education and training, etc.) activities supported by measures under the Facility, including participants to digital skills trainings’,

read:

‘The indicator shall take into account the number of participants to education (ISCED 0-8, adult learning) and training (off-the-job/in-the-job training, continuous vocational education and training, etc.) activities supported by measures under the Facility, including participants to digital skills trainings’;

on page 91, in the description of indicator 13 ‘Classroom capacity of new or modernised childcare and education facilities’:

for:

‘Classroom capacity in terms of the maximum number of places in the new or modernised early childhood education and care and education facilities (ISCED 0-6) due to support by measures under the Facility.’,

read:

‘Classroom capacity in terms of the maximum number of places in the new or modernised early childhood education and care and education facilities (ISCED 0-8) due to support by measures under the Facility.’;

for:

‘Education facilities shall include schools (ISCED 1-3, ISCED 4) and higher education (ISCED 5-6).’,

read:

‘Education facilities shall include schools (ISCED 1-3, ISCED 4) and higher education (ISCED 5-8).’.

---
No. 68582.

protests 62/17103 (A) and 63/5140(D) (New York).

#### Aragon Woven Label Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*360Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncatn Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4734-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Florida; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4734-DR), dated August 31, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 5, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective September 4, 2023.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-23211 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SWS
Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Hanks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date: November 12, 2002



/S/ Kenneth R. HanksKenneth R. Hanks Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 12,980.

#### In re SMITH.

[11 Int. Rev. Rec. 78.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1870.

Forfeiture — Brewery—Fraudulent Manufacture.

In the case of the brewery of Mrs. Clarissa Si i th, at Kingston, a verdict was given on the 28” i of February against the claimants, the jury refusing to believe the assertion of the defendant's witnesses, that the “blotter,” extracts from which were introduced by the prosecution, was merely a memorandum book kept by the foreman in the absence of the superintendent, and that the entries in it were faithfully transferred to the book required to be kept by law. On the contrary, they held that the amounts of ale entered in the “blotter” were fraudulently manufactured, and consequently the brewery and contents, appraised at $1,700, were declared forfeited.
Before the First Division,

October 5, 1960

No. 64638.

#### Otto Kadmon *v.*United States,

protest 59/8061 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. S. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiff was Sustained.
Toyota Motor Manufacturing 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 28, 2014

No. 04-14-00276-CV

Martin M. PARRA,

Appellant

v.

TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING TEXAS, INC.,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-20505

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on May 22, 2014. The clerk’s record contains 

appellant’s notice of appeal in which he states his intention to appeal the trial court’s March 24, 

2014 judgment compelling arbitration. The clerk’s record also contains a document entitled 

“Judge’s Notes” which are the trial court’s handwritten notations regarding a ruling made at a 

hearing. A judge’s handwritten notes are for his or her own convenience and form no part of the 

record. In re A.W., 384 S.W.3d 872, 873 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, no pet.). Accordingly, 

the “Judge’s Notes” contained in the clerk’s record is not a final, appealable order. In re L.H., 

No. 04-13-00174-CV, 2013 WL 3804585, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 17, 2013, no 

pet.). In response to an inquiry by the clerk’s office of this court, the trial court clerk stated that 

no order was signed in reference to the trial judge’s notes. It is therefore ORDERED that 

appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days of the date of this order why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 55059.

#### The Dayton Company *v.*United States,

protests 957570-G and 969215-G (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheet and statement of operations.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                           4,780
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  223,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,500
<INVENTORY>                                    149,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               372,989
<PP&E>                                          48,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,373)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 562,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,056
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   562,752
<SALES>                                        489,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               489,107
<CGS>                                          277,246
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  294,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 98,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,479
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,456
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.00


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

April 19, 1956

No. 59859.

#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 229937-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51220.

#### Protests 74194-K, etc., of International Trading Corp. et al. (New York)

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-22-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-25-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-07-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          52,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,870
<INVENTORY>                                    374,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               514,994
<PP&E>                                         968,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                 367,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,172,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          310,061
<BONDS>                                        414,849
<COMMON>                                           321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     424,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,172,429
<SALES>                                      1,109,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,116,183
<CGS>                                          850,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,083,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,263
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,681
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>