alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1115780
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   118190
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1233970
<PP&E>                                        23357801
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                24999991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           115031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    24882155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  24999991
<SALES>                                        3707848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4031979
<CGS>                                          1793828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   100132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                119115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2018904
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2018904
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2018904
<EPS-BASIC>                                      62.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    62.37


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 76 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Recognizing the social problem of child abuse and neglect, and 
         supporting efforts to enhance public awareness of it.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas more than 3,000,000 American children are reported as suspected victims 
        of child abuse and neglect annually;
Whereas more than 500,000 American children are unable to live safely with their 
        families and are placed in foster homes and institutions;
Whereas it is estimated that more than 1,000 children, 78 percent under the age 
        of 5 and 38 percent under the age of 1, lose their lives as a direct 
        result of abuse and neglect every year in America;
Whereas this tragic social problem results in human and economic costs due to 
        its relationship to crime and delinquency, drug and alcohol abuse, 
        domestic violence, and welfare dependency; and
Whereas Childhelp USA has initiated a ``Day of Hope'' to be observed on the 
        first Wednesday in April, during Child Abuse Prevention Month, to focus 
        public awareness on this social ill: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) it is the sense of the Congress that--
                    (A) all Americans should keep these victimized 
                children in their thoughts and prayers;
                    (B) all Americans should seek to break this cycle 
                of abuse and neglect, and give our children hope for 
                the future; and
                    (C) the faith community, nonprofit organizations, 
                and volunteers across America should recommit 
                themselves and mobilize their resources to assist these 
                children; and
            (2) the Congress--
                    (A) supports the goals and ideas of the ``Day of 
                Hope''; and
                    (B) commends Childhelp USA for its efforts on 
                behalf of abused and neglected children everywhere.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 14, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Steven G. Manson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Date: May 17, 2004 |  | /s/ STEVEN G. MANSONSteven G. Manson
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, David M. Mulder, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Salton, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Salton, Inc.

                                              By: /s/ David M. Mulder
                                                 ----------------------------
                                              David M. Mulder
                                              Executive Vice President, Chief
                                              Administrative Officer and
                                              Senior Financial Officer

November 12, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Salton, Inc. and will be retained by Salton, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       28
No. 51836.

#### Merrill, Clark & Meinig, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 505961-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves' which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
No. 68586.

protests 62/14805(B), etc. (New York).

#### Auburn Importing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*361Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material .respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 10.3


AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





AMENDMENT NO. 1 dated as of March 7, 2011 (“Amendment”), to the AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT made as of July 6, 2007 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and betweenMDC PARTNERS INC., a Canadian corporation (the “Company”), and MITCHELL GENDEL (the “Executive”).




WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Employment Agreement to provide for the amended terms and conditions set forth herein;




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree as follows:




1.           Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Employment Agreement.




2.           Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended such that Executive’s “Base Salary” shall be increased to $375,000 (effective April 1, 2011).  In addition, the following sentence shall be added to the end of Section 4(a):  “Effective January 31, 2008, the Company will provide the Executive with an annual perquisite allowance in an aggregate amount equal to $20,000 per annum (the “Perquisite Allowance”), to be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices.  The Perquisite Allowance amount shall be increased to $25,000 per annum effective January 1, 2011.”




3.           Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by revising the reference to “75%” to “100%” in the first sentence of such section.




4.           Section 7(b)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by revising the definition of “Total Remuneration”, adding the following clause at the end of the second sentence of Section 7(b)(i) as follows:  “, plus an amount equal to the Perquisite Allowance.”




5.           Section 7(c)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following clause to the end of the first sentence therein: “, provided that such multiple shall be increased to 2.0, effective as of the Executive’s seven-year anniversary date of employment with the Company (November 9, 2011).”




6.           As used herein and in the Employment Agreement, the term “Agreement” shall mean the Employment Agreement, as from time to time amended (including, without limitation, this Amendment).  Except as set forth above, the Employment Agreement, as amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect without further modification.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and each such counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument, but all such counterparts taken together shall constitute but one agreement.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement, on the day and year first above written.





MDC PARTNERS INC.By:
/s/ Barbara CreaghName:  Barbara CreaghTitle:     Executive Vice President/s/ Mitchell GendelMitchell Gendel





2
(Reap. Dec. 11091)

#### Samuel Shapiro & Company, Inc., a/c Johaneson, Wales & Sparre *v.*United States

Entry No. 996.

(Decided October 19, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> *6342. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon tbe agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Case Mo. 9,600.

#### MILLETT v. SNOWDEN.

[1 West. Law J. 240.]

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

1844.

Copyright — Music—Statutory Penalty por Infringement — Intention.

[The publisher of a newspaper who printed therein a piece of music which had been copyrighted is liable for the statutory penalty for infringement of one dollar per sheet, although he knew nothing of the copyright, and copied the music from another newspaper.]

The plaintiff [William E. Millett] obtained a copyright for a piece of music called “The Cot Beneath the Hill, a Ballad. — Poetry by James F. Otis, Esq.,” and now seeks to recover the penalty, as provided by statute, of one dollar per sheet for violation thereof. He charges that [William E.] Snowden, in the June number of the Ladies’ Companion, published such piece of music, &c. The defendant proved that the music had been copied from a Boston paper by the young man having charge of that department in the Ladies’ Companion, and that neither said young man nor Mr. Snowden knew of its being copyrighted, and that the music was changed in a trifling degree from the original. He also offered to prove that the words to which the music was set never belonged to plaintiff, and that he (defendant) had no intention of infringing the copyright.

Before BETTS, District Judge.

THE COURT,

in its charge, stated that intention could not be taken into view. If a *375copyright has been invaded, whether the party knew it was copyrighted or not, he is liable to the penalty. As to its being different from the original, in music, as in writing, the omission of a word or line or paragraph could not change it so as to avoid the statute. The poetry, in this instance, could not affect the result, as the copyright was for the music. A defendant is at liberty to show that the work copyrighted was iiot original with plaintiff, or that it was an abbreviation or alteration, and the jury could determine whether it was calculated to infringe the copyright or not. In cases of patents, the jury is at liberty to assess damages, but not in violation of copyright. The penalty in the latter is fixed by law. The jury, if they consider that defendant has republished without leave obtained in writing from plaintiff, must proceed to ascertain the number of sheets proved to have been sold, or offered for sale (not the number printed), and return a verdict of one dollar for each sheet so sold or offered to be sold.

Verdict for plaintiff, $625.
# Advanced Flight Maneuvers ( 

# * * * ) D

; 

# , Fly a circle and keep the aircraft nose pointed towards you. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.



# ------------ 

# --- --



# EJ Fly a 4 point square box clockwise while keeping the aircraft nose facing in your direction. 

# 11 11

,-----**---- -~,**  

# , \

# :**~** 

# t1

, 

# . , \ 

# , \ 

# , \ 

# ,. \ 

# ·- ------**~** 

# ----------- 

# El Fly a 4 point square box counter-clockwise while keeping the aircraft nose facing in your direction.

# Advanced Flight Maneuvers

# <* **)**~~** Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the phantom in the direction of travel.



# ®s s@ '**,~** 

## '
I ' 

## '**------ -----------**  

# &®$**~~** Fly a circle counter-clockwise and keep the aircraft nose pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.

# ---**-- ---------.** 
"**~~---- ,.._**  

## ___________ 

# .... .. ' I 

## , 

# m Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the aircraft nose pointed at the center of the circle. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

### <ID

# Advanced Flight Maneuvers<***) 

# D Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.

# ~**~ --------** **~** 

# ,'

... '+-
-· ' ,

.............J/J!IItl--

___**c."!.----- ~** **----~--** 

## ............**~** 

# ',,



# .. ,'

# --------**-----------**
Fly a Figure 8 with the aircraft nose of the Phantom pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.

Fly Figure 8 patterns while experimenting with different orientations. For example, aircraft nose always pointed in a given direction or opposite/left/right the direction of travel, etc. Be sure to keep the altitude thesame and the circle as uniform as possible.

# Emergency Situations 

# D

EJ Return Home 

### & Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom at least 50ft away from your take off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. The Phantom will enter it's failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. Let the Phantom finish it's routine and land itself within 2 meters of the take off point.



# • 15 meters



### Intercepting Return Home 

### & Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 50ft away from your take off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. The Phantom will enter it's failsafe Return- To-Home Mode. When the Phantom is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower position, then continue flying the Phantom. 

# ltr

-**----** - ' 

# ' • 15 meters

## www.dji.com

Copyright:2014 DJIInnovations. All Rights Reserved

.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 394

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make

technical corrections in the enrollment of S. 1374.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 394

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1374)

3 to authorize the development and maintenance of a multi4 agency campus project in the town of Jackson, Wyoming,
2

•HCON 394 EH

1 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor2 rections:

3 (1) In section 1, strike ‘‘1999’’ and insert

4 ‘‘2000’’.

5 (2) In section 5(a), strike ‘‘section 3’’ and in6 sert ‘‘section 4’’.

7 (3) In section 7(a)(1), strike ‘‘memorandum of

8 agreement referred to in section 4(a)(1)(A)’’ and in9 sert ‘‘memorandum of understanding referred to in

10 section 4(a)(1)(B)’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 12,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-35CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-35CB


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                     Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                     Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InLand Capital Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InLand Capital  Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/S/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andprincipal executive officer of InLand Capital  Fund, L.PDate:November 6, 2006
# L_2022181EN.01003601.xml

| 7.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 181/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 181/36

---

to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/716 of 6 May 2022 on the approval of a Smart Diesel Fuel Heater for use in conventional combustion engine and certain hybrid electric passenger cars and light commercial vehicles as an innovative technology pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 133 of 10 May 2022
  )

On page 35, in Article 4:

for:

‘eco-innovation code 37’

read:

‘eco-innovation code 38’.

On page 39, in the Annex in point 3 in Formula 5:

for:

‘

  Image 1

  ’

Read

‘

  Image 2

  ’

On page 40, in the Annex in point 4 in Formula 6:

For

‘

  Image 3

  ’

read:

‘

  Image 4

  ’

On page 40, in the Annex in point 4 in Formula 7:

For

‘

  Image 5

  ’

read:

‘

  Image 6

  ’

---
# L_2022109EN.01007501.xml

| 8.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/75

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/339 of 28 February 2022 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Ukrainian Armed Forces

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 61 of 28 February 2022
  )

On page 3, in Article 4(4), point (p):

for:

| ‘(p) | the State Defence Logistics and Procurement Centre of Latvia;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(p)

the State Defence Logistics and Procurement Centre of Latvia;’,

read:

| ‘(p) | the Ministry of Defence of Latvia and the State Defence Logistics and Procurement Centre of Latvia;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(p)

the Ministry of Defence of Latvia and the State Defence Logistics and Procurement Centre of Latvia;’.

---