alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10807)

#### American Roland Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 818454.

(Decided August 25, 1964)

*Eugene R. Piehrell*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> *391IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe Plaintiff and tbe Assistant Attorney General for tbe United States, defendant, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court:

> 1. Tbe merchandise marked “A” and initialed EGA by Examiner E. Alfano on tbe invoice herein consists of Pyridoxine Hydrochloride exported from Denmark to the United States during tbe period October 19,1961 through December 31, 1961, which was appraised on the basis of foreign value, as that value is defined in Section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Section 8 of the Customs Simplification [sic] Act of 1938.

> 2. Pyridoxine Hydrochloride is on the final list promulgated by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, published as T.D. 54521, in the Eederal Register, issue of January 20,1958.

> 3. There is no foreign value as defined, supra, for such or similar merchandise, and that the merchandise should have been appraised on the basis of export value, as defined in Section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, supra.

> 4. No Pyridoxine Hydrochloride was sold or offered for sale for consumption in Denmark.

> 5. At the time of exportation of the merchandise marked “A” as aforesaid, the price at which such merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States, including the cost for all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was:

> Period Dutiable value Basis

> 10/19/61 to 12/31/61 U.S. $64.50 per kilo CIE Export value

> 6. This appeal may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value for the period indicated below was as follows:

> Period Dutiable value

> U.S. $64.50 per kilo CIE 10/19/61 to 12/31/61 L

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 59856.

#### Armand Schwab & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 243487-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 67672.

#### Schick X-Ray Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/4399 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of injectors and parts, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Schick X-Ray Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 38, C.D. 2358), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61630.

#### D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 298207-K (New York).

*475Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accord? anee with said decision, parts for enlargers are properly dutiable as parts of photographic cameras under paragraph 1551, the claim of the plaintiff at 20 percent was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Please read accompanying notes.)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000878071
<NAME>                        Olympus Ventures, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.000
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   20,892
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     103,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                104,334
<PP&E>                          1,315,324
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,439,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           442,060
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        966
<OTHER-SE>                      (19,284,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,439,466
<SALES>                         763,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                763,950
<CGS>                           181,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   181,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                467,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              3,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    111,286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .12
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [FR ID 178915]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# DATES:

The agency must receive comments on or before December 19, 2023.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rolanda F. Smith, 202-418-2054.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The following applicants filed AM or FM proposals to change the community of license: EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION, KAZK(FM), FAC. ID NO. 176305, FROM: WILLCOX, AZ, TO: CATALINA, AZ, FILE NO. 0000219614; MICHAEL RADIO COMPANY, LLC, KLLM(FM), FAC. ID NO. 762455, FROM: WHEATLAND, WY, TO: HORSE CREEK, WY, FILE NO. 0000205045; COCHISE BROADCASTING LLC, KXKR(FM), FAC. ID NO. 2185, FROM: CATALINA FOOTHILLS, AZ, TO: SOUTH TUCSON, AZ, FILE NO. 0000219669; FAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES, INC, WCOI(FM), FAC. ID NO. 768403, FROM: ELLICOTTVILLE, NY, FRANKLINVILLE, NY, FILE NO. 0000219900; AND AMERICAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC., WMNK(FM), FAC. ID NO. 177028, FROM: MINOOKA, IL, TO: SHERIDAN, IL, FILE NO. 0000219024. The full text of these applications is available electronically via Licensing and Management System (LMS),                     *https://apps2int.fcc.gov/​dataentry/​public/​tv/​publicAppSearch.html.*

Federal Communications Commission.

Nazifa Sawez,

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2023-23121 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0144

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT L. WITHEROW,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including July 17, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 15 2022

06/15/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0144
Before the Third Division,

February 28, 1958

No. 61607.

#### Louis Weinberg Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 304912-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S SECOND FISCAL QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                          10,327
<SECURITIES>                                    30,183
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                       789
<INVENTORY>                                     11,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,107
<PP&E>                                          40,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,895
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,553
<SALES>                                         52,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,812
<CGS>                                           22,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,624)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

November 27, 1967

No. P67/415.

No. P67/416.

No. P67/417.

No. P67/418.

No. P67/419.

#### Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/8337-13425, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/12262-13573, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/15476-13679, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/17404-13801, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff *&*Associates, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 64/1275-14098, etc. (Chicago). *910Dowst Manufacturing Company *v.*United States, protests 65/5752-14577 and 65/8656-14957 (Chicago).

No. P67/420.

Eichardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gamble Vargish & Co., dba Seabury & Co.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,262
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,063
<PP&E>                                         338,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,824
<BONDS>                                        150,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           921
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   352,150
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,574
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,917
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
        

</TABLE>
New Chemical Substance: TS- 10KK7G

Redacted
EXHIBIT
10.8




AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO


AMENDED AND RESTATED
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is
made this 3rd day of November, 2009 between DealerTrack Holdings, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
Richard McLeer, (“Executive”).




WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive entered into the Amended and Restated Senior Executive
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2007, as amended (the “Employment
Agreement”); and




WHEREAS,
the parties now desire to amend the Employment Agreement by modifying the terms
thereof to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.




NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:




1.           Amendments.




(a)           Effective
immediately, the following language from Section 5(c)(1) of the Employment
Agreement and shall have no further force or effect (herein referred to as the
“Pro Rata Bonus
Provision”):




“a pro
rata bonus calculated based on multiplying the percentage of the year Executive
worked for Employer during the year of his termination by Executive’s target
Bonus for such year and payable within thirty (30) days of the Severance
Commencement Date, and”




(b)           Effective
immediately, the following paragraph is inserted in place of and replaces the
Pro Rata Bonus Provision in its entirety:




“a pro
rata bonus for the Fiscal Year in which Executive’s employment by the Company
terminates (determined by multiplying (x) Executive’s Bonus for such Fiscal
Year, determined as though Executive’s employment had not terminated during such
Fiscal Year, by (y) a fraction (not greater than one), the numerator of which is
the number of days Executive is employed during such Fiscal Year up to and
including the date on which Executive’s employment by the Company terminates,
and the denominator of which is 365) payable at the time that the Company pays
bonuses for such Fiscal Year to its other similarly situated senior executive
officers, but in no event later than seventy-five days following the last day of
such Fiscal Year, and.”





2.           Other Terms
Unmodified. Except as expressly modified hereby, the Employment Agreement
remains unmodified.




3.           Counterparts. This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be
deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same
instrument. Facsimile copies shall have the same effect as
originals.




[Remainder
of page intentionally left blank]





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment
as of the date first written above.




EXECUTIVE:NameDate:COMPANY:By:Name:Title:Date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000876528
<NAME> CROWN ENERGY CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               344,096
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,647,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,553
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       230,029
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,647,789
<SALES>                                         77,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,496
<CGS>                                           54,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  242,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               734,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (917,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (373,833)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (543,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (543,698)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)
Before the Second Division,

December 6, 1967

No. P67/428.

#### American Rieter Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 64/2283, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of parts of draw-twister machines, dedicated to use on or with such machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline*Division, and *Alltransport, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
---

Exhibit 99.14


CONSENT OF TIMOTHY A. ROSS Reference is made to the technical report entitled Technical Report Updatedated March 2, 2010, which the undersigned has prepared for Baja Mining Corp. (the Technical Report). I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) of Baja Mining Corp. Dated this 30th day of March, 2012. /s/Timothy RossName: Timothy Ross


---
No. 56226.

protests 174729-K, etc. (New York).

#### Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested not found were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was hold that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 52415.

protests 25417-K, etc. (Boston, etc.).

#### Q. W. Lung Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>
                              Second Supplement to
                       Appendix A to Employment Agreement
                        Between Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
                                       and
                            G. Kenneth Stephens, Jr.



                  Base Salary, Bonus Compensation and Benefits
                  --------------------------------------------



1.       Effective February 1, 2003, Employee's Base Salary shall be $300,000.

2.       For Fiscal Year 2003 ("FY 2003"), the Employee shall be eligible to
         receive a Bonus of up to $293,750.

         (a) Maximum Bonus potential for FY 2003 will be determined based on the
         criteria approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
         Directors.


         No other items or portions of items in Appendix A as previously
         supplemented are affected by this Supplement.


                                      Agreed to and accepted:

                                      STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.


Date:   June 25, 2003                 By: /s/ JAMES W. MCFARLAND
                                          ----------------------
                                            James W. McFarland
                                     Compensation Committee Chairman


                                      EMPLOYEE


Date:   June 25, 2003                 /s/ G. KENNETH STEPHENS, JR.
                                      ----------------------------
                                        G. Kenneth Stephens, Jr.