alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code

I, Jack N. Hayden, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Technology
Solutions Company, certify that:



| | (i)  |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and                                                
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Technology Solutions
Company.

|                  |  |     |  |                                                      | 
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: May 5, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ JACK N. HAYDEN                                   | 
|                  |  |     |  |                                                      | 
|                  |  |     |  | Jack N. Hayden
President and Chief Executive Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Technology Solutions Company and will
be retained by Technology Solutions Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Page 28
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000878071
<NAME>                        Olympus Ventures, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   15,820
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                15,820
<PP&E>                          1,315,324
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,350,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           443,367
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,426
<OTHER-SE>                      19,084,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,350,952
<SALES>                         344,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                344,049
<CGS>                           8,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   8,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                317,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              5,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 13,525
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    13,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .005
        


</TABLE>
No. 60642.

#### Senter Brass Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 192422-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10665 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DERREK WYNE HORTON

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 262

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Derrek Wyne Horton has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Horton h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 3, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10665 Document: 00515021054 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2019No. 18

- 10665

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is G RANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-10665 Document: 00515021054 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2019
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors
Paracel Online Systems, Inc.:

   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-3 and related Prospectus of WavePhore, Inc. for the registration of
5,727,277 shares of its common stock of our report dated July 3, 1997, with
respect to the balance sheets of Paracel Online Systems, Inc. (formerly
Carthage International, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of Paracel, Inc., as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the period from January 1,
1995 to December 4, 1995 (Predecessor), the period from December 5, 1995
(acquisition) to December 31, 1995 and the year ended December 31, 1996
(Successor), which report appears in Form 8-K/A of WavePhore, Inc. dated August
12, 1997.
    

   
We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
Prospectus. 
    


                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

   
Los Angeles, California
September 26, 1997
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gustavo Dominguez, * From the 39th District

 Court of Haskell County,

 Trial Court No. 6433.

Vs. No. 11-11-00152-CR * April 18, 2013

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in 

the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the 

trial court is in all things affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS COMPANY
1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 
 Award Subject to Acceptance of Agreement
 Rights as a Stockholder
 Vesting of Shares Subject to Award
 Vesting of Award




---



##### 



Change in Control
 Termination of Award
 Additional Terms and Conditions of Award
 Nontransferability of Award
 Investment Representation
 Withholding Taxes 2
        Adjustment
 Compliance with Applicable Law
 Delivery of Certificates
 Award Confers No Rights to Continued Employment
 Decisions of Board or Committee
 Company to Reserve Shares
 3




---



##### 



Agreement Subject to the Plan
 Miscellaneous Provisions
 Meaning of Certain Terms
 Successors
 Notices
 Governing Law
 Counterparts
 TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS COMPANYBy:Name:Title:Accepted this  day of , 2006.Holder
 4
<PAGE>
                              Second Supplement to
                       Appendix A to Employment Agreement
                        Between Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
                                       and
                                Michael K. Crane



                  Base Salary, Bonus Compensation and Benefits
                  --------------------------------------------



1.       Effective February 1, 2003, Employee's Base Salary shall be $275,000.

2.       For Fiscal Year 2003 ("FY 2003"), the Employee shall be eligible to
         receive a Bonus of up to $268,750.

         (a) Maximum Bonus potential for FY 2003 will be determined based on the
         criteria approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
         Directors.


         No other items or portions of items in Appendix A as previously
         supplemented are affected by this Supplement.


                                     Agreed to and accepted:

                                     STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.


Date:   June 25, 2003                By: /s/ JAMES W. MCFARLAND
                                         ----------------------
                                           James W. McFarland
                                    Compensation Committee Chairman


                                     EMPLOYEE


Date:   June 25, 2003                /s/ MICHAEL K. CRANE
                                     --------------------
                                       Michael K. Crane
No. 54464.

#### Amtorg Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 146127-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 61161.

protests 131247-K, etc. (New York).

#### F. Ducharne Silk Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of woven silk fabrics, valued at more than $5.50 per pound, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *C. M. Gourdon, Inc.*(43 C. C. P. A. 4, C. A. D. 601), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         870,311
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      10,544,731
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,728,205
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,308,330
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,333,000
<LOANS>                                     81,942,023
<ALLOWANCE>                                    880,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,363,777
<DEPOSITS>                                  89,024,834
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,929,789
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            657,080
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,722,251
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,029,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             100,363,771
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,800,939
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              193,020
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,993,939
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,036,089
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,078,471
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          915,488
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   60,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                646,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                312,849
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     207,994
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   207,994
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.82
<LOANS-NON>                                    220,205
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                404,410
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               848,085
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   29,831
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              880,254
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           880,254
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,927
<PP&E>                                           6,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,430)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,558
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,683
<SALES>                                          7,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,920
<CGS>                                            6,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   656
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    447
<INCOME-TAX>                                       170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .044
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 59879.

#### Boroff-Norman Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 205764-K (A) and 247776-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the items in question are neither appropriate nor suitable for the purpose of ornamentation to which artificial fruits may be temporarily devoted; that said items have been produced by subjecting fibers of straw to various processing steps which result in a completed article of commerce in chief value of straw in its natural state; and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that involved in *Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 182, C. D. 1465). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authority, the items marked *“A”*were held dutiable at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1558, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52827), for nonenumerated manufactured articles and the items marked “B” at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (a) as manufactures of straw, not specially provided for.
Case No. 14,310.

#### TYLER et al. v. HYDE et al.

[2 Blatchf. 399.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

July 1, 1852.

Pleading at Law — Motion to Strike Out Plea.

The sufficiency, in point of substance, of a plea which is regular in form, cannot be inquired into on motion.

■ After the decision in this case [see Case No. 14,309], on the demurrer to the plea puis darrein continuance, the defendants, under the leave then given them to plead over, put in a special plea, which the plaintiffs now moved to strike out, on the ground that it was,,, in effect, a repetition of the plea puis darrein continuance which was adjudged bad.- The defendants opposed the motion, and insisted that the plea was regular and valid because it pleaded the judgment and decision of the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Louisiana., as it now stands upon the records of that court.

Edwin W. Stoughton, for plaintiffs.

George .R. J. Bowdoin, for defendants.

BETTS, District Judge.

The court will not, on this motion, enter into a consideration of the sufficiency of the plea in point of substance, or inquire whether it is founded upon the rightful decree of the circuit court in Louisiana. It may,' possibly, become necessary for this court to determine, when the proofs -are presented, which decree of that court is the valid one governing the case, should two be certified from it which are in conflict in particulars affecting the merits. The privilege accorded to the defendants to plead over, was subject to no restrictions, and they are entitled under it to interpose any plea which would have been good if put in independently of that leave. The defendants plead at their peril, and their plea, being regular in form, cannot be displaced by motion. The plaintiffs must demur to it or take issue on the facts it sets up.

Motion denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 20283 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAFAEL MAJANO MALDONADO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 590

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rafael Majano Maldonado appeals his conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for illegal presence in the United States. Citing Pereira v. Sessions , 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), he contends that his prior removals do not satisfy the removal element of § 1326 because the notice to appear in his original removal

proc eeding did not state the date, time, and place of the removal hearing. In United States v. Pedroza

- Rocha , 933 F.3d 490, 497

- 98 (5th Cir. 2019 ), petition

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 23, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20283 Document: 00515355536 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2020No. 19

- 20283

2 for cert. filed ( U.S. Nov. 6, 2019) (No. 19

- 6588) , we relied on Pierre

- Paul v. Barr , 930 F.3d 684, 688

- 89 (5th Cir. 2019 ), petition for cert. filed ( U.S. Dec. 16, 2019) (No. 19

- 779), to conclude that (1) a notice to appear that lacked the date and time of the removal hearing was not defective, (2) in the alternative, any defect was cured by the subsequent mailing of a notice of hearing, and (3) the purported defect was not jurisdictional. Additionally, we held that the defendant could not collaterally attack the notice to appear without first exhausting administrative remedies

. Pedroza

- Rocha , 933 F.3d at 498. Conceding that Pedroza

- Rocha and Pierre

- Paul foreclose his claim, Majano Maldonado raises it to preserve it for further review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance , which is proper if “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Because Majano Maldonado correctly concedes that his claim is foreclosed by Pierre

- Paul and Pedroza

- Rocha , t he motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-20283 Document: 00515355536 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2020
THE STATE OF SOUTH C AROLINA

In The Supreme Court

The State, Respondent,

v.

Demario Monte Thompson, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2017

- 001992

O N WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

A ppeal From L ancaster County

Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge

Op inion No. 27878

Heard March 28, 2019

– Filed April 3, 2019

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY

GRANTED

A ppellate Defender Joanna K. Delany, of Columbia, for

Petitioner.

Attorn ey General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,

both of Columbia , and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr

. , of Kershaw, all for Respondent.

PE R CURIAM: We granted Demario Thompson 's petition for a writ of certiorari

to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in State v. Thompson , 420 S.C. 386,

803 S.E.2d 44 (Ct. App. 2017). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
# C_2022487EN.01001401.xml

| 22.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 487/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 487/14

---

Corrigendum to Joint statement of the European Parliament and the Council in relation to Regulation (EU) 2022/2379, as regards the importance of establishing in all Member States a register held by national competent authorities on the use of plant protection products in agriculture

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 466 of 7 December 2022
  )

(2022/C 487/09)

On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 21, in the heading:

for:

‘Council’,

read:

‘European Parliament

Council’.

---