alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7428

PATRICK ELLIS COCHRAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2:20

- cv - 00315

- RGD

- LRL )

Submitted : September 28, 2022 Decided: November 3, 2022

Before HARRIS and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Patrick Ellis Cochran, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7428 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Patrick Ellis Cochran seeks to appeal the district c ourt’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cochran ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cochran has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7428 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/03/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TAL International Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Burns, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 22, 2016/s/ JOHN BURNS John BurnsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000876716
<NAME>                    Smith Barney International Advisors Currency Fund L.P.

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                   2,392,776
<SECURITIES>                                               (40,425)
<RECEIVABLES>                                                9,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,362,253
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           2,362,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      213,522
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               2,148,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2,362,253
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          (214,747)
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            13,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (228,312)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (228,312)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jay Lutsky, Principal Financial Officer, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-K of IBI Acquisitions, Inc.;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.         I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally  accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.         I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code I, Timothy P. Dimond, the Chief Financial Officer of Technology Solutions
Company, certify that:  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Technology Solutions Company. Date: August 12, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ TIMOTHY P. DIMONDTimothy P. DimondChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Technology Solutions Company and will
be retained by Technology Solutions Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
   
     Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. hereby consents to all references made to it in
Amendment No. 1 to this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of SpinCycle, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 1998.
    
 
                                          /s/ PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Pedersen & Houpt, P.C.
 
Chicago, Illinois
   
September 25, 1998
**Exhibit
        32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
      (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
      undersigned officer of Smart Balance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Form
      10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in
      the
      Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.


Date:
              March 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Alan
              S. GeverAlan
                S. Gever
              Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                financial officer)
No. 57094.

protests 137984-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Worcester Royal Porcelain Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of china figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) As to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (b) as to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption subsequent to May 28,1950, at 10 percent under said paragraph 1547 (a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52373, and the President’s proclamation, T. D. 52476.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72477-72478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-11454-01-OMS]


Good Neighbor Environmental Board

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a public meeting of the Good 
Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB). The purpose of this meeting is for 
the board to discuss and approve the final integrated draft of its 20th 
comprehensive report on water and wastewater infrastructure issues and

[[Page 72478]]

challenges along the U.S.-Mexico border region.

DATES: November 6, 2023, from 1 p.m.-5 p.m. (EDT). A copy of the agenda 
will be posted at www.epa.gov/faca/gneb.
    The meeting will be held virtually and in-person at the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters located at 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460. The meeting is open to 
the public with limited access available on a first-come, first-served 
basis. Members of the public wishing to participate should contact 
Eugene Green at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8cfdacdcdc686cdddcfcdc6cde8cdd8c986cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6b7e6969622269796b6962694c697c6d226b637a">[email protected]</span></a> by October 30th.
    Requests to make oral comments or submit written public comments to 
the board, should also be directed to Eugene Green at least five 
business days prior to the meeting. Requests for accessibility and/or 
accommodations for individuals with disabilities should be directed to 
Eugene Green at the phone number or email address listed below. To 
ensure adequate time for processing, please make requests for 
accommodations at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding the GNEB meeting, please 
contact Eugene Green at (202) 564-2432 or via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99feebfcfcf7b7fcecfefcf7fcd9fce9f8b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87e0f5e2e2e9a9e2f2e0e2e9e2c7e2f7e6a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The GNEB is an independent federal advisory 
committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463. Its mission is to advise the President and Congress of the 
United States on good neighbor practices along the U.S. border with 
Mexico. Its recommendations are focused on environmental infrastructure 
needs within the U.S. states contiguous to Mexico.

Eugene Green,
Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2023-23125 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1
 
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
 DATE:  June 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Byron L. BergrenByron L. BergrenPresident and Chief
Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Keith E. PlowmanKeith E. PlowmanExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 8.1**

List of Subsidiaries

Contax S.A., commonly referred to as Contax, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil.

TODO Soluções em Tecnologia S.A., commonly referred to as Todo, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil. 

BRC – XVI EMPRRENDIMENTOS IMOBILIÁRIO LTDA, commonly referred to as BRC, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil.

Ability Comunicação Integrada LTDA, commonly referred to as Ability, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil.

Contax Colombia S.A.S, commonly referred to as Contax Colombia, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Colombia.

Stratton Spain S.L. commonly referred to as Stratton Spain, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of Spain.

Allus Spain S.L. commonly referred to as Allus Spain, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of Spain.

Stratton Argentina S.A., commonly referred to as Stratton Argentina, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Argentina.

Stratton Peru S.A. commonly referred to as Stratton Peru, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Peru.

Multienlace S.A. commonly referred to as Multienlace, a company organized and incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Colombia.

 

----
Exhibit 10.10
 
 th
   Employment
 Duties and Responsibilities
 Extent of Service
 Base Salary
 1




---



##### 



Incentive Compensation
 Stock Compensation
 Retirement and Welfare Plans
 Reimbursement of Expenses; Vacation provided that
 2




---



##### 



Termination
 Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason Before A Change of
Control
     Stock Options
 3




---



##### 



Termination Without Cause; Resignation for Good Reason After or in Connection With A
Change of Control.
 
  4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



Voluntary Termination
 Disability
 6




---



##### 



Death
 Cause
 Notice of Termination
 Definitions
      7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



Non-Exclusivity of Rights
 Employee Proprietary Information, Inventions and Noncompete Provisions
 Acknowledgment
 Survivorship
 Mitigation
 Notices
  9




---



##### 



th
  
  Contents of Agreement; Amendment and Assignment
   Severability
 Remedies Cumulative; No Waiver
 10




---



##### 



Withholding
 Miscellaneous
 Governing Law
 11




---



##### 



NxStage Medical, Inc.By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey H. Burbank

Jeffrey H. BurbankTitle:
    
    President & CEOEXECUTIVE/s/ Michael J. WebbMichael J. Webb
 12
Before the Third Division,

September 11, 1958

No. 62336.

#### James E. Fox & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 7228-R (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The petition was dismissed.
Exhibit 99.10




COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR UNITED STATES READERS ON CANADA – UNITED STATES REPORTING DIFFERENCES




To the Board of Directors of Penn West Petroleum Ltd., the administrator of Penn West Energy Trust




In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory statement with respect to revised financial statements.  As discussed in note (a) to the supplemental note entitled "Reconciliation of Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles", the December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements have been restated to correct misstatements.  Our report to the unitholders dated March 18, 2010 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not require this reference in the auditors’ report when the revision is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.






Signed “KPMG LLP”







Chartered Accountants


Calgary, Canada


March 18, 2010
No. 62330.

#### Herz Specialty Products, Inc., and D. J. Ambrosio *v.*United States,

protests 310921-K and 310025-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2013

NO. 03-12-00108-CV

Charles Norris, Appellant

v.

Melissa M. Norris, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the district court’s 

order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the order of the district court 

is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT EDWARD PHILLIP RUTHERFORD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-546 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 28, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Mark C. Katzef, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.