alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25587]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science 
Advisory Committee (NSAC). Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Monday, November 17, 2014, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting 
Center, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, (301) 468-1100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda L. May, U.S. Department of 
Energy; SC-26/Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585-1290 Telephone: (301) 903-0536.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and guidance on a continuing 
basis to the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation 
on scientific priorities within the field of basic nuclear science 
research.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

Monday, November 17, 2014

 Perspectives from Department of Energy and National Science 
Foundation
 Update from the Department of Energy and National Science 
Foundation's Nuclear Physics Office's
 Status of the Long Range Plan Activities
 Status of Isotope Subcommittee Activities
 Presentations from DOE/NSF National Users Facilities

    Note:  The NSAC Meeting will be broadcast live on the Internet. 
You may find out how to access this broadcast by going to the 
following site prior to the start of the meeting. A video record of 
the meeting including the presentations that are made will be 
archived at this site after the meeting ends: http://www.tvworldwide.com/events/DOE/141117/.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of these items on the agenda, you should 
contact Brenda L. May, (301) 903-0536 or Brenda.May@science.doe.gov 
(email). You must make your request for an oral statement at least five 
business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to 
include the scheduled oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of 
the Committee will conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly 
conduct of business. Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available on the U.S. 
Department of Energy's http://science.energy.gov/np/nsac/ Web site for 
viewing.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 22, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-25587 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
| | KPMGllp                    |                         
| | -------------------------- | ------------------------
| | Chartered Accountants      | Telephone (416) 777-8500
| | Bay Adelaide Centre        | Telefax (416) 777-8818  
| | 333 Bay Street, Suite 4600 | www.kpmg.ca             
| | Toronto, ON M5H 2S5        |                         





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors Jaguar Mining Inc.



We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F
of:



| | • | our Independent Auditors' Report dated March 23, 2012 on the consolidated financial statements of Jaguar Mining Inc. comprising
the consolidated balance sheets of Jaguar Mining Inc. as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | • | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 23, 2012 on the consolidated balance sheets of Jaguar
Mining Inc. as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations
and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010;
and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | • | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 23, 2012 on Jaguar Mining Inc's internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2011
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



each of which is contained in or incorporated by reference in
this annual report on Form 40-F of Jaguar Mining Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. We also hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of the above mentioned reports into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-144969)
of the Company.







Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public
Accountants



Toronto, Canada

March 23, 2012
Order entered June 5 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 005 39 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 00540 - CR CURTIS WAYNE GRIGGS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appea l from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 296 - 80961 - 2018 & 296 - 80962 - 2018



### O RDER Before the Court are the June 3, 2019 “Notice [s] of Nonsuit of Appeal” filed in each of the above appeals which we shall treat as m otions to dismiss the appeals. We DENY the motions without prejudice to filing motions to dismiss that comply with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a) (appellant and his attorney must sign written motion to dismi ss).

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No.1
to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of American Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Joseph Kliminski, Chief Executive
Officer, and Eric B. Heyer, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in the
Report.













/s/Joseph
      Kliminski
                        
                        /s/Eric B.
      HeyerJoseph
      Kliminski
                        
                        Eric
      B. HeyerChief
      Executive Officer
                        
                        Senior
      Vice President, Treasurer and(Principal
      Executive Officer)
                        
                        Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal Financial
      and Accounting Officer)Date:
      January 28, 2009
                        
                        Date:
      January 28,
2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs June 25, 2012

STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. PATRICIA KIMBROUGH v. 

BRIAN HALES

Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Carter County

No. 19859 G. Richard Johnson, Chancellor

No. E2011-02539-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 25, 2012

PARTIAL SEPARATE CONCURRENCE

_____________________________________

I agree fully with the majority’s conclusions in this case. I write separately only because I

would use different reasoning for holding that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine

of unclean hands.

I would hold the doctrine of unclean hands inapplicable because there is no authority for

applying an equitable doctrine such as unclean hands to affect Mr. Hales’ child support

obligation. First, Mr. Hales has a specific statutory duty to pay child support, and he cites

no authority for applying an equitable doctrine to obviate this statutory duty. Second, the

doctrine of unclean hands operates between Ms. Kimbrough and Mr. Hales, and the

biological father’s duty to provide support is to the child, not to the mother. So I would find

the doctrine of unclean hands wholly inapplicable.

For this reason, I concur separately as to this issue. Otherwise, I concur in the majority

opinion.

______________________________________

HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE 6
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    196,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           522
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,288)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,085
<SALES>                                        147,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,008
<CGS>                                          129,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (522)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James B. Hawkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/    JAMES B. HAWKINSPrint Name: James B. Hawkins Title: President and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 9, 2005




In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Natus Medical Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J.
Murphy, Vice President Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/    STEVEN J. MURPHYPrint Name: Steven J. Murphy Title: Vice President Finance Date: August 9, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code

I, Timothy P. Dimond, the Chief Financial Officer of Technology Solutions
Company, certify that:



| | (i)  |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and                                                
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Technology Solutions Company.

|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 12, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ TIMOTHY P. DIMOND  
|                      |  |     |  |                        
|                      |  |     |  | Timothy P. Dimond      
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Technology Solutions Company and will
be retained by Technology Solutions Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 59345.

protests 198779-K, etc. (New York).

#### W. J. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 99.4**

** **

# **Report of Management on Compliance**

 

We, as members of management of OnyxAcceptance Corporation (“Onyx”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital One Auto Finance,Inc. (“COAF”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary ofCapital One Financial Corporation, are responsible for complying with therequirements of Sections 2.04(a),2.04(b), 3.07, 3.08(a), 3.09(a), 4.02(a), 4.02(e) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July21, 2005 between Onyx Acceptance Owner Trust 2005-B, Onyx Acceptance Financial Corporation, Onyx AcceptanceCorporation, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. which wasfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K on July 26, 2005(the “Agreement”) regarding the Onyx Acceptance Owner Trust 2005-B Class ANotes.  We are also responsible forestablishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance withthe requirements referred to in the preceding sentence.

 

An evaluation of Onyx’s compliance with therequirements of Sections 2.04(a),2.04(b), 3.07, 3.08(a), 3.09(a), 4.02(a), 4.02(e) of the Agreement as ofDecember 31, 2005 and for the year then ended has been performed under oursupervision.  Based on this evaluation,we assert that as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Onyx complied inall material respects with the requirements of these sections of the Agreement.

 

 
| Onyx Acceptance Corporation | Onyx Acceptance Corporation |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                        |                        |
|                        |                        |   |
| By:                         | /s/ David R. Lawson         |   | By: | /s/ Patrick C. Gray |   |
| Name:                       | David R. Lawson             | Name: | Patrick C. Gray |
| Title:                      | Chairman                    | Title: | Assistant Vice President |
|                             |                             |  |  |  |  |

 

 

March 30, 2006

 

----
(Reap. Dec. 10597)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3119.

(Decided October 9, 1963)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for tbe plaintiff.

*Jolm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto that the merchandise involved in the appeal for reappraisement *416enumerated on tbe schedule attached hereto and made a part thereof, consists of birch plywood exported from Finland in the year 1955 and that the merchandise described in the schedule attached hereto is properly valued on the basis of Export Value, as defined in Section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise and the issues involved in the above designated appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation*A.R.D. No. 133 (decided on remand in R.D. 10151) and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the value or the price of the merchandise described in the schedule hereto annexed, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States, was the values set forth in Column “4” of the schedule attached hereto, packed, less the pro-rated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in said reappraisement set forth in the schedule attached.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this stipulation applies only to birch plywood. The price of all merchandise other than birch plywood appearing on any of the entries herein, such as *doors, MocJoboard, hardboard, etc.,*is to remain as appraised.

On tbe agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the birch plywood in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the values set forth in column “4” of the schedule, hereto attached and made a part hereof, “packed, less the pro-rated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise.”

As to all other merchandise, such as doors, blockboard, hardboard, etc., included in the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, the appraised values thereof are sustained.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00537-CR

Donald Martin MOORE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5878

Honorable Mark Luitjen, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 25, 2019

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, 

and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and 

agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). This court 

must dismiss this appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not 

been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 

675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 
04-19-00537-CR

- 2 -

On August 14, 2019, we notified Appellant that this appeal would be dismissed under Rule 

25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the right of appeal 

was made part of the appellate record by September 3, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; 

see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 

174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). To date, no response has been filed. 

Absent an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the right of appeal, 

Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613; Daniels, 

110 S.W.3d at 176. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 56851.

#### Air Express International Agency, Inc., and International Standard Electric Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 176613-K and 178223-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of J^-watt or 1-watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.