alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 57 4 . ALI SAI D MOHAMED v . THE STATE.

In Sep t em

b er 2 0 1 7

, Al i Sai d M o h am ed p l ead ed gu i lt y t o a r m e d ro b b ery an d

o t h er cri m es

. He was rep res en t ed b y co u ns el at h i s p l ea h eari n g. W it h in t h e s am e t erm

o f co u rt

, M o h am ed fi led a p ro s e m o t i o n t o w i t hd raw h i s g u i l t y p l ea. On Feb ru ary 1 3,

2 0 1 8

, th e co u rt d i sm i s s ed M o h am ed ’ s m ot i o n

. Th ereaft er, M oh am ed ’ s p lea co u n s el

p as s ed away

, an d M o h am ed fi l ed a “ m o t i o n fo r o ut -o f-t i m e ri g h t to wi t h d raw g ui l t y

p l ea.” On M ay 3 1

, 2 0 1 9, t he co u rt d i s m i s s ed t h e ren ewed m o t i o n

. On A u g u s t 2 9,

2 0 1 9

, Mo h am ed fi led a n o ti ce o f ap p eal

, ch al l en g i ng t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s de n i a l o f h i s

m o ti o n s. W e l ack ju ri s d ict i o n

.

A n o t ice o f ap p eal m

u s t b e fi l ed wi th i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t h e t ri al co u rt o rd er

s o u g ht t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5-6 -3 8 (a). T he p ro p er an d ti m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal i s an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i ct i o n o n th i s Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v.

S t a t e

, 2 6 4 Ga. 8 7 2

, 8 7 2 ( 1 ) ( 4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). M o ham ed ’ s n o t i ce o f ap p eal

, October 25, 2019fi led 5 6 2 d ay s fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s d i s m i s s al o f h i s m o ti o n t o wi t h d raw hi s g ui l t y

p l ea an d 9 0 d ay s fro m t h e d i sm i s s al o f hi s ren ew e d m ot i o n, i s u nt i m el y

. 1

Acco rd in g ly , t h i s ap p eal m us t b e DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 In h i s n o ti ce o f ap p e a l

, M o h am ed in d i cat es th at d i d n o t l earn o f t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s M ay

2 0 1 9 o rd er fo r s ev eral m o n t h s . If, as h e ap p ears t o s u g g es t

, hi s ri g h t to

t i m el y seek ap pel l at e rev i ew was fru s t rat ed d u e t o a t ri al co u rt erro r, h i s rem ed y i s to

p et i t i o n t he t ri al co u rt t o v acat e an d re-en t er t h e o rd er at i s s u e in t h e m an n er d es cri b ed

i n Ca mb ro n v. Ca n a l In s. Co

. , 2 4 6 Ga. 1 4 7 , 1 4 8 -1 4 9 (1 ) (2 6 9 SE2 d 4 2 6) (1 9 8 0 ). 10/25/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
C0NSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,074
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,202
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,447
<PP&E>                                         349,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,106
<BONDS>                                        127,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           929
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,325
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,861
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

June 21, 1946

No. 51203.

#### Protests 89195-K, etc., of Selsi Co., Inc. (New York).

*156Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence conclusively established that the aneroid barometers are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Selsi Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 150, C. D. 962). In accordance therewith the claim at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372 was sustained.
Order entered June 5, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00539-CR

No. 05-19-00540-CR

CURTIS WAYNE GRIGGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 296-80961-2018 & 296-80962-2018

ORDER

Before the Court are the June 3, 2019 “Notice[s] of Nonsuit of Appeal” filed in each of 

the above appeals which we shall treat as motions to dismiss the appeals. We DENY the 

motions without prejudice to filing motions to dismiss that comply with rule 42.2(a) of the rules 

of appellate procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a) (appellant and his attorney must sign written 

motion to dismiss).

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof DynCorp International LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael J. Thorne, Chief Financial Officer,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: June 29, 2006 | /s/ MICHAEL  J. THORNE                                        |   |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     | Michael J. Thorne                                             |   |   |
|                     | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |   |
|                     | (principal financial and principal accounting  officer)       |   |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 5.1


Company Filings Search                                               Page 1 of 1

                  [GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP LETTERHEAD]

November 12, 1998

Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  P.F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. Form S-1
     File No. 333-59749

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   
     As counsel to P.F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. (the "Company"), we are 
rendering this opinion in connection with a proposed sale of 3,967,500 shares 
of the Company's newly-issued Common Stock and shares of its Common Stock held 
by the Selling Stockholder as set forth in the Registration Statement on Form 
S-1 to which this opinion is being filed as Exhibit 5.1 (the "Shares"). We have
examined all instruments, documents and records which we deemed relevant and 
necessary for the basis of our opinion hereinafter expressed. In such 
examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures and the 
authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity 
to the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies. 
    

     Based on such examination, we are of the opinion that the Shares 
identified in the above referenced Registration Statement will be, upon 
effectiveness of the Registration Statement and receipt by the Company or the 
Selling Stockholder, as the case may be, of payment therefor, validly 
authorized, legally issued, fully paid, and nonassessable.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the 
above-referenced Registration Statement and to the use of our name wherever it 
appears in said Registration Statement, including the Prospectus constituting a 
part thereof, as originally filed or as subsequently amended.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP
Before the Second Division,

February 3, 1954

No. 57837.

protests 177124-K, etc. (New York).

#### Atlantic Steel & Iron Co. and H. A. Gogarty, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum rods similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mohawk Iron & Steel Co.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 274, C. D. 1533), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,988
<PP&E>                                          24,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,095)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,276
<BONDS>                                          3,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,472
<SALES>                                         18,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,377
<CGS>                                            8,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                       164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,218
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,218
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.15
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,458
<SECURITIES>                                    17,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,699
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,685
<PP&E>                                          18,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           446
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,767
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,604)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,893
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (530)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,167)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CARLOS SERGIO SAMANIEGO-OCHOA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 05-588M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Conspiracy to Distribute Methamphetamine

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance December 8, 2005

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required and the safety of other persons and the community.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is charged by Complaint with a co-defendant with the offense of

Case 2:05-mj-00588-MJB Document 9 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 

PAGE -2

conspiracy to distribute in excess of 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing

methamphetamine.

(2) Defendant was not interviewed by Pretrial Services. He is a native and citizen of

Mexico, believed to be in the United States illegally. An immigration detainer has been filed.

(3) Defendant does not contest detention.

(4) Defendant poses a risk of nonappearance due to lack of verified background

information, illegal status in the United States, and immigration detainer. He poses a risk of

danger due to the nature of the instant offense.

(5) There does not appear to be any condition or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings while addressing the danger

to other persons or the community.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

Case 2:05-mj-00588-MJB Document 9 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 

PAGE -3

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 8th day of December , 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-mj-00588-MJB Document 9 Filed 12/08/05 Page 3 of 3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2018

No. 04-18-00868-CV

Clifford Reed LEONARD,

Appellant

v.

Prunella LEONARD,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI16519

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record for this appeal has filed 

a notification of late record, stating that the reporter’s record has not been filed because: (1) 

appellant has failed to request the record in writing, and (2) appellant has failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to 

appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the 

reporter’s record, which request must designate the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits 

to be included. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1). 

It is further ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) 

days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have 

been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fee. 

The reporter’s record must be filed no later than ten (10) days after the date appellant’s 

written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, 

appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date the clerk’s record is filed, and 

the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a 

reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 266

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the benefits of music

education.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2000

Mr. MCINTOSH (for himself, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. KUCINICH,

and Mrs. ROUKEMA) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the benefits

of music education.

Whereas there is a growing body of scientific research demonstrating that children who receive music instruction

perform better on spatial-temporal reasoning tests and

proportional math problems;

Whereas music education grounded in rigorous instruction is

an important component of a well-rounded academic program;

Whereas opportunities in music and the arts have enabled

children with disabilities to participate more fully in

school and community activities;
2

•HCON 266 IH

Whereas music and the arts can motivate at-risk students to

stay in school and become active participants in the educational process;

Whereas according to the College Board, college-bound high

school seniors in 1998 who received music instruction

scored 53 points higher on the verbal portion of the

Scholastic Aptitude Test and 39 points higher on the

math portion of the test than college-bound high school

seniors with no music or arts instruction;

Whereas a 1999 report by the Texas Commission on Drug

and Alcohol Abuse states that individuals who participated in band or orchestra reported the lowest levels of

current and lifelong use of alcohol, tobacco, and illicit

drugs; and

Whereas comprehensive, sequential music instruction enhances early brain development and improves cognitive

and communicative skills, self-discipline, and creativity:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) music education enhances intellectual devel4 opment and enriches the academic environment for

5 children of all ages; and

6 (2) music educators greatly contribute to the

7 artistic, intellectual, and social development of

8 American children, and play a key role in helping

9 children to succeed in school.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 321 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 321

    Urging increased Federal funding for juvenile (Type 1) diabetes 
                               research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2000

Mr. Green of Texas (for himself, Mr. Archer, and Mr. Bentsen) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Urging increased Federal funding for juvenile (Type 1) diabetes 
                               research.

Whereas over one million Americans suffer from juvenile (Type 1) diabetes, a 
        chronic, genetically determined, debilitating disease affecting every 
        organ system;
Whereas 13,000 children a year--35 each day--are diagnosed with juvenile 
        diabetes;
Whereas 17,000 adults a year--46 each day--are diagnosed with juvenile diabetes;
Whereas juvenile diabetes is one of the most costly chronic diseases of 
        childhood;
Whereas insulin treats but does not cure this potentially deadly disease and 
        does not prevent the complications of diabetes, which include blindness, 
        heart attack, kidney failure, stroke, nerve damage, and amputations;
Whereas the Diabetes Research Working Group, a nonpartisan advisory board 
        established to advise Congress, has called for an accelerated and 
        expanded diabetes research program at the National Institutes of Health 
        and has recommended a $4.1 billion increase in Federal funding for 
        diabetes research at the National Institutes of Health over the next 
        five years; and
Whereas a strong public-private partnership to fund juvenile diabetes exists 
        between the Federal Government and the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, a 
        foundation which has awarded more than $326 million for diabetes 
        research since 1970 and will give $100 million in fiscal year 2001: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Federal funding for diabetes research should be increased in 
accordance with the recommendations of the Diabetes Research Working 
Group so that a cure for juvenile diabetes can be found.
                                 <all>
```