alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 97

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should designate

the month of June 1997, the fiftieth anniversary of the Marshall Plan,

as George C. Marshall month, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 5, 1997

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. ROBB) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should

designate the month of June 1997, the fiftieth anniversary of the Marshall Plan, as George C. Marshall month,

and for other purposes.

Whereas 1997 marks the fiftieth year since the European Recovery Program, or what came to be called the Marshall

Plan, was first conceived and proclaimed by General

George Catlett Marshall while he was serving as Secretary of State of the United States;

Whereas the Marshall Plan has been hailed by leaders of

World War II allied and enemy countries alike as the

most magnanimous act by Americans in history;
2

•SRES 97 ATS

Whereas the Marshall Plan made possible new measures of

trans-Atlantic cooperation through the North Atlantic

Treaty Organization and other institutions;

Whereas these institutional developments have profoundly enhanced the security, freedom, and prosperity of the

United States and the Atlantic Community generally;

Whereas new challenges have arisen which call for recommitment to and reinvigoration of these institutions and for

their continued viability;

Whereas creative thought and rededication to the ideals and

principles undergirding the Marshall Plan are now necessary in order to assure the preservation and perfection

of these institutions; and

Whereas the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the Marshall Plan provides a fitting opportunity for rededication

of commitments to these institutions: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate—

2 (1) that magnanimity underlies the Marshall

3 Plan, the dedication to public service and integrity

4 of its author, and the efforts by the Marshall Foun5 dation in Lexington, Virginia, the Marshall Inter6 national Center in Leesburg, Virginia, and the

7 Friends of Marshall, Uniontown, Pennsylvania, to

8 continue in American life the values for which Gen9 eral George Catlett Marshall stood;

10 (2) that all Americans should rededicate them11 selves to the ideals of public service, hard work, in-
3

•SRES 97 ATS

1 tegrity, and compassion which General Marshall rep2 resents to this day in American society; and

3 (3) that the values that inspired the initiation

4 of the Marshall Plan should continue to be cherished

5 by the people of the United States.

6 SEC. 2. It is, further, the sense of the Senate that

7 the President should issue a proclamation designating the

8 month of June 1997 as ‘‘George C. Marshall Month’’ and

9 calling upon the people of the United States to observe

10 George C. Marshall Month with appropriate programs,

11 ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .
Agreement s Adopte d byth e Traffi c Conference s o f th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n 

## OST-2010-028 9

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEI\/IENT S

BYTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N



# - - -.. - 

# 0 / /AT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D DOCKET OST Thi s approval andgran t

o f antitrus t immi jject , wher e applicable , to condition s previousl y imposed . Thi s actio n i s elTcctiv e after 7 day s unles s apetitio n i s filedunde r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s own motion . I n vie w o f th e agreement' s noiicontroversia l natur e an dth e availability o f th e above-Brocedure , theil-jla y DgHoj l i n 1 4 CF R303.4 2 i s waived . abQve-Broce ( 

# p u RV - ^-~rA-njl~>IA . /f { - f\/4>\r ^

Director , Offic e o f

Intertfational Aviatio n 

### 1 6 Decembe r201 0 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St . N.W . #12 * Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER REMANDING CASE

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BRENT WILKS,

Plaintiff, 

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, 

Social Security Administration,

Defendant. _____________________________________

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

Case No. C06-948-RSM-JPD

ORDER REMANDING CASE

The Court, after careful consideration of the plaintiff's complaint, the parties’ briefs, all

papers and exhibits filed in support and opposition thereto, the Report and Recommendation of

the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, and the balance of the

record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is

REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings not inconsistent

with the Report and Recommendation.

Case 2:06-cv-00948-RSM Document 17 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER REMANDING CASE

PAGE - 2

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge

Donohue.

DATED this 9th day of March, 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00948-RSM Document 17 Filed 03/09/07 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Notice of Adjustment of Minimum Project Worksheet Amount

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the minimum Project Worksheet Amount 
under the Public Assistance program for disasters and emergencies 
declared on or after October 1, 2023, will be increased.

DATES: This adjustment applies to major disasters and emergencies 
declared on or after October 1, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod Wells, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 44 CFR 206.202(d)(2) provides that FEMA will 
annually adjust the minimum Project Worksheet amount under the Public 
Assistance program to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for 
All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice of an increase to $3,900 for the minimum amount 
that will be approved for any Project Worksheet under the Public 
Assistance program for all major disasters and emergencies declared on 
or after October 1, 2023.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 3.7 percent for the 12-month period 
that ended in August 2023. This is based on information released by the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of Labor on September 
13, 2023.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-23163 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT
      99.1













**Report
      of Independent Accountants**









To
      the
      Board of Directors and


Shareholder
      of Equity One, Inc.:









We
      have
      examined management’s assertion about Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries’
(the “Company”) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
      the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s Uniform Single Attestation Program
      for Mortgage Bankers (“USAP”) as of and for the year ended November 30, 2005
      included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management
      is
      responsible for the Company’s compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
      Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the
      Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
      the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
      examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the
      minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
      considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
      provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
      a
      legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended November
      30, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





February
      27, 2006
















**Management’s
        Assertion Concerning Compliance**
 **with
        USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**
   February
        22, 2006
   As
        of and
        for the year ended November 30, 2005, Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries
        (the “Company”),
        a wholly-owned subsidiary of Popular Financial Holdings, Inc., have complied
        in all
        material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage
        Bankers Association
        of America’s *Uniform
        Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (“USAP”) solely
        for purpose of servicing the residential mortgage loans underlying the Loan
        Asset Backed Certificate
        Series 1997-1, 1998-1, 1999-1, 2000-1, 2001-1, 2001-2, 2001-3, 2002-1, 2002-2, 2002-3,
        2002-4, 2002-5, 2003-1, 2003-2, 2003-3, 2003-4, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2004-3, 2004-4,
        2004-- 5,
        2005-1, 2005-2, 2005-A, 2005-3, 2005-B, 2005-4, 2005-C, 2005-5, 2005-D (the “Agreement”)
        except as noted as
        follows:
  As
        of and
        for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and errors
        and
        omissions policies
        in the amounts of $65,000,000 and $25,000,000, respectively.


/s/ John
                N.
                MartellaJohn
                N. MartellaGroup
                  Executive Vice President of Loan Servicing
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,931
<SECURITIES>                                    19,036
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,164
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,596
<PP&E>                                          14,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           269
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,762
<SALES>                                             49
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,407
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (383)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   910
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
No. 59873.

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 265333-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the record showing no evidence to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 282

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Declaring the ‘‘Person of the Century’’ for the 20th

century to have been the American G.I.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 282

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the 20th century was a century of conflict between

forces of totalitarianism and dictatorship and forces of

democracy and freedom;

Whereas American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines (collectively referred to as ‘‘G.I.’s’’) fought, bled, and died in

a number of conflicts during the 20th century, including
2

•HCON 282 EH

two World Wars, to secure peace and freedom around the

world;

Whereas in large measure due to the heroic efforts of the

American G.I., more people around the world enjoy the

benefits of freedom at the end of the 20th century than

at any other time in history;

Whereas the American G.I., in fighting the forces of totalitarianism and dictatorship, had a strong personal sense

of right and wrong and did not want to live in a world

where wrong prevailed;

Whereas it may truly be said that during the 20th century

the American G.I. accomplished great things while doing

good things, becoming recognized throughout the world

as a representative of freedom and democracy and, fundamentally, as a force for good in the face of evil;

Whereas at the end of the 20th century numerous organizations and publications sought to identify and designate a

‘‘Person of the Century’’ based upon achievements and

contributions during that century; and

Whereas in light of the accomplishments of the Armed Forces

of the United States during that century both in defeating the forces of tyranny and dictatorship and in embodying a sense of honor, decency, and respect for mankind,

it is appropriate that the American G.I. be recognized as

the single most significant force affecting the course of

the 20th century: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress hereby declares the ‘‘Person
3

•HCON 282 EH

1 of the Century’’ for the 20th century to have been the

2 American G.I.

Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Elliott Davis, LLC**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Board of Directors

Atlantic Bancshares, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-137630) filed by Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. in connection with registration of shares of its common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of options pursuant to the Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of our Report dated March 19, 2008, which is included in the Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 
| /s/ Elliott Davis, LLC   |
|--------------------------|
| Columbia, South Carolina |
| March 27, 2008      |

 

----
Before the First Division,

November 29, 1962

No. 67225.

protests 59/18893, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Cajo Trading Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 53342.

protests 140407-K, etc. (New York).

#### Charles Hall, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities ■ cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 60630.

#### Wallner & Mayer, Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 254656-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that one case, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the one case of merchandise, which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
##### 



Exhibit 10.13
  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE OF
RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC
  1. Unconditional Guarantee.
 2. DEFINITIONS.
  3. Nature of Guarantee.




---



##### 



4. Changes in Obligations, Collateral therefor and Agreements Relating Thereto; Waiver of Certain
Notices.
 5. Expenses.
 6. Subrogation.
 2




---



##### 



7. Taxes.
 8. No Waiver; Cumulative Rights.
 9. Representations, Warranties and Covenants.
 A.
  3




---



##### 



B.
  4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



C.
 10. Credit Agreement Trigger Event.
 11. Guarantee Events of Default.
 A.
      6




---



##### 



B.
 12. Assignment. provided however
 7




---



##### 



13. Notices.
  
   14. Continuing Guarantee.
 15. Indemnification.
 16. Governing Law.
 8




---



##### 



17. Severability.
 18. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL.
 19. JURISDICTION.
 20. Miscellaneous.
 9




---



##### 



RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC,as GuarantorBy: /s/ William F. Casey IIIName: William F. Casey IIITitle: Sr. Managing Director & Treasurer
 Guarantee
No. 61126.

protest 294822-K (New York).

#### David Traum Co., Inc., and Cohen & Mann *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of marking wheels, wholly or in chief value of steel, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and chiefly used in the household to transfer *394pattern markings to fabrics prior to sewing the fabrics, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2023120EN.01001001.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/10

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision of 25 October 2022 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Denmark, Germany, Greece, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Malta and Portugal

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 481 of 19 December 2022
  )

(2023/C 120/09)

On page 2, Article 1, heading ‘I. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES’, column ‘Members’, entry relating to Cyprus:

for:

‘Mr Prodromos PRODROMOU’,

read:

‘Mr Prodromos CHRYSANTHOU’.

---
No. R66/11.

#### Panation Trade Co. *v.*United States, reappraisement R65/5465 (New York).

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Panation Trade Co.*v. *United States,*54 Cust. Ct. 758, A.R.D. 181, the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in *842section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T. D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the cigarette lighters here in question and that such value is the total appraised value, less the item of inspection fee or design adjustment fee as invoiced.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
EPS PRIMARY REPRESENTS BASIC NET INCOME PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         130,462
<SECURITIES>                                    52,104
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,132)
<INVENTORY>                                     27,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,721
<PP&E>                                       1,105,436
<DEPRECIATION>                               (374,156)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,578,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          606,679
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           463
<OTHER-SE>                                     660,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,578,520
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,516,179
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,344,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88
        

</TABLE>