alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall L. Marcuson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| May 8, 2006 |                                    |
|-------------|-----------------------------------------|
|        |                                    |
|        | /s/ Randall L. Marcuson                 |
|        |                                         |
|        | Randall L. Marcuson                     |
|        | President and Chief Executive   Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 69980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22391]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18147 and #18148; GEORGIA Disaster Number GA-
00161]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Georgia 
(FEMA-4738-DR), dated 09/09/2023.
    Incident: Hurricane Idalia.
    Incident Period: 08/30/2023.

DATES: Issued on 10/02/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/08/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Georgia, dated 09/09/2023, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

    Primary Counties: Burke, Montgomery, Toombs, Treutlen.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-22391 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
No. 57533.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 184741-K/3714 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are “in fact mathematical instruments,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0131

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOHNATHAN JAMES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 7 2022

09/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0131
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 27

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. LAZIO submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, February 12, 1999, it stand adjourned

4 until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 23, 1999, or until

5 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas6 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, Feb9 ruary 11, 1999, Friday, February 12, 1999, Saturday,

10 February 13, 1999, or Sunday, February 14, 1999, pursu11 ant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his des12 ignee, pursuant to this concurrent resolution, it stand re-
2

•HCON 27 ATH

1 cessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, February 22,

2 1999, or such time on that day as may be specified by

3 the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

4 or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

5 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

6 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

7 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

8 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

9 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead10 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

11 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

12 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
AMENDMENT


TO


EMBREX, INC.


AMENDED AND RESTATED
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AND


NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN





THIS AMENDMENT to the Embrex, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Stock Option and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the Plan) is made effective as of the 18  th day of July 2002.





WHEREAS, the Plan was previously amended on May 16, 2002, in order to increase the number of shares of the Companys Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan from 2,600,000 to 3,400,000;





WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it would be in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders to further amend the Plan; and





WHEREAS, on July 18, 2002, the Board of Directors
approved an amendment to the Plan as set forth below;





NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 19 of the Plan, the
Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of Section 4 of the Plan in its entirety, which reads: No option or stock award shall be granted under the Plan after December 31, 2002, but options theretofore granted may extend beyond
that date.





This Amendment is limited as specified and shall not constitute a modification or amendment of
any other provision of the Plan or any option agreement issued pursuant to the Plan.





Approved by the Board of
Directors on July 18, 2002.





ATTESTED BY:/s/    DON T. SEAQUISTDon T. Seaquist Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(A)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  SALTON, INC.


<Table>
<Caption>

                                                       39 WEEKS
                                                        ENDED
                                                       3/27/2004                      YEAR ENDED
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)                         (UNAUDITED)      2003         2002       2001         2000
------------------------------------------------      -----------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Fixed Charges
  Interest and amortization of debt issuance costs
     on all indebtedness                              $    29,794    $  41,008   $  43,357   $  39,043   $  31,102
  Add interest element implicit in rentals                  2,812        3,807       3,040       3,724       1,923
                                                      -----------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------

     Total fixed charges                              $    32,606    $  44,815   $  46,397   $  42,767   $  33,025
(Loss) Income
  (Loss) Income before income taxes                   $   (48,572)   $  10,916   $  44,541   $  73,846   $ 146,903
  Add fixed charges                                        32,606       44,815      46,397      42,767      33,025
                                                      -----------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
  (Loss) Income before fixed charges and income taxes $   (15,966)   $  55,731   $  90,938   $ 116,613   $ 179,928
                                                      ===========    =========   =========   =========   =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                          (0.49)        1.24        1.96        2.73        5.45
</Table>
No. 56854.

#### W. A. Cleary Corp. and W. R. Keating & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 180198-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lecithin (soybean residual sludge) similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *C. J. Tower & Sons*(38 C. C. P. A. 131, C. A. D. 450), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 
**, JJ,** 

**no?zorabla P.**  **a,** 

### bd.rath COMty **AtiUitor Cooke**  **cowkty caineov1lle,**  **Texea**

### .of th6 stetc or Tsntl:*, inalu5in& att010A3 627 to t&l, lnclwivd, of cauq#Aw2, Title 18, i&aVlsed Statutes or 

### xgll, QSaaraadad br Scratlou. 1 chapter 203,hota or 193. E@uler L;eOOlatr,

and ursuaut to an 0 & P 32 psaed by ti cx-aairraoneM, Court of Cooke oounty Texftn, on the 13thday or 3q+abar#. A. C. i920, d.ll.oh order is of reoord Is nook 9, pages33sto 3&b inoluuive, of
the Mm&a Of Se$.O **OQUi C.!** 

### tbsre8f. rata or interest b8rna by the bonda

and pie0t1or 

### -3=nt of prin4iipi31 aa4 ir;torcret, OEQ rlxing rorm or bond nc4 cou on, en4 pro- 

### ~i~iae r0r 

### the **hvy** 

### 0r ~n 66 VII **E**

### 0fa3 -X **up022** thei tozable property in auS3 road 

### dletrlot nufri0i6nt **to pay**  **th3** 

### i.amfat **0% SUO~**  **b0m and**  **u) pro&we**  **e** ***W&ii** 

### fund **for the**  **rabony2tiw** 5r 

### the **rinoipal** 

### thur0or at **itimrityr** 

### are hereby le@ E 6et?, approved and vol.lQeted.”



### m vbew **or** 

### thy; vd.id0ti511 **or** 

### *&5bonds 3x1the r0m 

### in rhlah they were lecpued, aM lu aoeordrinoa with the order& under whloh they were 

### lswsd the bonds maynot be railecamsd bBr0ra saturity. **i?osd ’** **31str** 

### i **at Ho.**  **2,** 

### Colorado county v. chw$Oly (Telx. cit. Jtpg.) I.20 53. 15. (al) $59. Th6 QBBO olted **ia t!!etararfiretlve**  **OS tha**  point **there, the**  **bowla were**  **issued with**  **the provlulan**  

### thttt **oarta la**  **bon68** should be optional on 63002-t~in bate, 0uhf3~ th0 '0mt.r or d430tion ryld**p0~idsd** that the bfsnds

ahonld be 

### optionalOA any 

### intweet pying i%&+t~ TheIBouaty BnnlsndQd in that MM that ingrovlslon in the bon& 

## thst tha auae ahwld be . 0 6Et&Ml eJ.lu

an a dat6 amtaln l?ucs 4t varluau8 with the prueothi procte~u8 the pmvioicm wad invalid and i5opemtlva 

### bo t&a sxEent’~to w&l&Wit 

### aonrllataa 

## withthe pmelso~ionproCIbC?dwCi. 

### The oeurt pakited 

## out that 

### thiv bon&awra 

### lruruelz **prior to**  **th6 d~i~ion**  **or.3x8uni~ 0.**  **aoogac 5iipm3,**  

### find the the lrunaanoaor th61bonda hat been vsU4atab b,.:~the flxct CallMl asalon or the **39th** A.e&$uluturPr. It wao, ther8ror%, bald t&it the b&nAs were aot optianaX, eava and exocp& um th@ one data fl~~$dr~r tbu~-~dumption bof~~~~~~~ty.

330 01s~ of Ooohl"M County v+ Una la &ot appUoab2o Eo the baads Bclraunder eoneid~mtion. -3mt daoislon 

### mlatee only tcr8ounty bosda uraued 

### undwchapter 2 or,Tltle 22, Bemea 

### Clvllcitntute#a, **1925,** 

### an&to bonda ieBu6c under the statutory provitians whloh were th% onceeCorll of ianptar 21 

### namuly, Chat 2 of l’itlct i8 of the iZaviaad Civil Stotutea.-..

or19ll. 

### Cur o&Lon ho. CXiI+93.oototruea the sppUosbillty

3f th6 

### Cochrm COtUIfy 0~386)t0 COUnt$ baqdse h.oopy of It la 

### anolosd hesmith ;‘x yclur informAlon.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Chugach Electric  Association,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September  30,  2007,  I,
William R. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(a) This quarterly  report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information  contained in this quarterly report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 19, 2007


                                                     /s/ William R. Stewart
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     William R. Stewart
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
### Appendix **E**

**. State Program Status** 

**State Ap**  **proved State NPDES**  **Permit Program**  **Ap proved to** 

**Regulate Federal**  **Facilities Ap**  **proved**

**State Pretreatment**  **Program Ap**  **proved**

**General Permits**  **Program Ap**  **proved**

**Biosolids (Sludge)**  **Program** Alabama Alaska * Am erican Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Ida ho Illinois Indiana Iowa Johnston Atoll Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Midway Island Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Northern Mariana Islands Ohio Ok lahom a Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina**State Ap**  **proved State NPDES**  **Permit Program**  **Ap proved to** 

**Regulate Federal**  **Facilities Ap**  **proved**

**State Pretreatment**  **Program Ap**  **proved**

**General Permits**  **Program Ap**  **proved**

**Biosolids (Sludge)**  **Program** South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermo nt Virgin Islands Virginia Wa ke Island Washington West Virginia Wi sconsin Wyom ing

* Phased program over three (3) years. At time of program approval, Alaska will administer the NPDES program for domestic discharges (individual and general permits), log storage and transfer facilities, s eafood processing facilities (individual and general permits), and hatcheries. Alaska will assume authority for federal facilities, pretreatment, and stormwater on 10/31/09.

.



### Source: URL :http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/statestats.cfm Last updated on April 14 , 2003 1:58 PM

Accessed on November 08 , 20 11
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3957 — PAI Partners/Crown Holdings GPC)

(2005/C 247/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, DavidP. Southwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 9,2006

|        |     | /s/ DAVID P.  SOUTHWELL   |
|--------|----------|---------------------------|
|   |     | David P. Southwell        |
|   | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will beretained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
H. Con. Res. 408 Agreed to October 27, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas on November 26, 1943, a German bomber off the coast

of North Africa sunk the British transport HMT ROHNA with

a radio-controlled, rocket-boosted bomb;

Whereas 1,015 United States service members and more than 100

British and Allied officers and crewmen perished as a result

of the attack;

Whereas hundreds died immediately when the bomb struck and

hundreds more died when darkness and rough seas limited rescue

efforts;

Whereas many families still do not know the circumstances of

the deaths of loved ones who died as a result of the attack;

Whereas more than 900 United States service members survived

the attack under extremely adverse circumstances;

Whereas United States, British, and French rescuers worked valiantly to save the passengers and crew who made it off the

HMT ROHNA into the sea;

Whereas one United States ship, the USS PIONEER, picked up

many of those who were saved;

Whereas because of inadequate record keeping, some survivors of

the attack struggled for years to verify the details of the sinking

of the HMT ROHNA;

Whereas the men who died as a result of the attack on the HMT

ROHNA have been largely forgotten by the Nation; and

Whereas the Congress and the people of the United States have

never recognized the bravery and sacrifice of the United States

service members who died as a result of the sinking of the

HMT ROHNA or the United States service members who survived

the sinking and continued to serve the Nation valiantly abroad

during the war: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress expresses appreciation for—

(1) the United States service members who died in the

sinking of the HMT ROHNA, for the heroic sacrifice they made

for freedom and the defense of the Nation;

(2) the United States service members who survived the

sinking of the HMT ROHNA, for their bravery in the face

of disaster and their subsequent service during the war on

behalf of the Nation;

(3) the families of all of these service members; and
H. Con. Res. 408—2

(4) the United States, British, and French rescuers, especially the crew of the USS PIONEER, who endangered their

lives to save the passengers and crew of the HMT ROHNA.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
**Exhibit
      32.1**







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick
      G. LePore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





*This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
      Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
      such
      filing.*





/s/
      Patrick G. LePore


Patrick
      G. LePore


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


November
      21, 2007
No. 58341.

protests 120487-K, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the Western white spruce lumber the subject of C. *J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1538), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.
No. 51832.

#### Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 47229-K (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In *112accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice ■ should be coa-verted at the buying rate in' the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the'entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.