alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 449/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 449 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 645 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 449

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 645 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2021/C 449/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 1 | 1 |
| 2021/C 449/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 1 | 6 |
| 2021/C 449/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2 | 11 |
| 2021/C 449/04 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2 | 17 |
| 2021/C 449/05 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2 | 25 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2021/C 449/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 1

1

2021/C 449/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 1

6

2021/C 449/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2

11

2021/C 449/04

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2

17

2021/C 449/05

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) for the financial year 2021 – amending budget No 2

25

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofAtlantic Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), each certify that, to his orher knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

1.               The annual report of the Company for theperiod ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 27,  2008 | By:                      | /s/  Robert P. Trask     |
|--------|----------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------|
|   |                 | Robert  P. Trask         |
|   |                 | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                 |                     |
| Date:  | March 27,  2008 | By:                      | /s/  Michelle M. Pennell |
|   |                 | Michelle  M. Pennell     |
|   |                 | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 56244.

protests 141297-K, etc. (New York).

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 57056.

protests 167838-K (B), etc. (New York).

#### V. Sabella & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of peppers, pickled with vinegar, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *E. J. Petrosemolo Co., Inc.,*and *Barian Shipping Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1461), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 303 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 303

 Authorizing the President of the Senate, the President of the Senate 
  pro tempore, and the Majority and Minority Leaders to make certain 
 appointments during the recess or adjournment of the present session.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 15 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the President of the Senate, the President of the Senate 
  pro tempore, and the Majority and Minority Leaders to make certain 
 appointments during the recess or adjournment of the present session.

    Resolved, That during the recess or adjournment of the present 
session of the Senate, the President of the Senate, the President of 
the Senate pro tempore, the Majority Leader of the Senate, and the 
Minority Leader of the Senate be, and they are hereby authorized to 
make appointments to commissions, committees, boards, conferences, or 
interparliamentary conferences authorized by law, by concurrent action 
of the two Houses, or by order of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                              67
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,190)
<INVENTORY>                                     16,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,682
<PP&E>                                          46,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,205)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,036
<BONDS>                                          2,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              189
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,198
<SALES>                                         25,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,854
<CGS>                                           23,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL A. BURNHART,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMANDER REED HOLTGEERTS,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0816-RSL-MAT

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Amended Report and Recommendation of the Honorable

Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the balance of

the record, does hereby ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Amended Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend his complaint a second time, and the

second amended complaint that he has submitted (Dkt. #17) shall be filed;

(3) The constitutional claims and state law claims presented in the second amended

complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. The sole remaining claim which

may proceed is plaintiff’s claim under the federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510

Case 2:06-cv-00816-RSL Document 22 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -2

et seq;

(4) The Clerk shall STRIKE plaintiff’s pending motion for an extension of time (Dkt.

#15) and the previous Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #14) as moot; and

(5) Pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. § 636, and

Local Rule MJR 9, this matter is referred to Judge Theiler for pretrial matters,

including service of the second amended complaint. The Clerk shall forward

copies of this Order to plaintiff and to Judge Theiler. 

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00816-RSL Document 22 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 368 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 368

     Establishing a special task force to recommend an appropriate 
 recognition for the slave laborers who worked on the construction of 
                       the United States Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2000

Mr. Watts of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Establishing a special task force to recommend an appropriate 
 recognition for the slave laborers who worked on the construction of 
                       the United States Capitol.

Whereas the United States Capitol stands as a symbol of democracy, equality, and 
        freedom to the entire world;
Whereas the year 2000 marks the 200th anniversary of the opening of this 
        historic structure for the first session of Congress to be held in the 
        new Capital City;
Whereas slavery was not prohibited throughout the United States until the 
        ratification of the 13th amendment to the Constitution in 1865;
Whereas previous to that date, African American slave labor was both legal and 
        common in the District of Columbia and the adjoining States of Maryland 
        and Virginia;
Whereas public records attest to the fact that African American slave labor was 
        used in the construction of the United States Capitol;
Whereas public records further attest to the fact that the five-dollar-per-month 
        payment for that African American slave labor was made directly to slave 
        owners and not to the laborer; and
Whereas African Americans made significant contributions and fought bravely for 
        freedom during the American Revolutionary War: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
        President pro tempore of the Senate shall establish a special 
        task force to study the history and contributions of these 
        slave laborers in the construction of the United States 
        Capitol; and
            (2) such special task force shall recommend to the Speaker 
        of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore 
        of the Senate an appropriate recognition for these slave 
        laborers which could be displayed in a prominent location in 
        the United States Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS HEALTH & HUMAN

SERVICES AND EL PASO STATE

SUPPORTED LIVING CENTER

,

Appellant s

,

v.

DAVID SEPULVEDA

,

Appellee. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 0 43

- CV

Appeal from the

120 th D istrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018

- DCV

- 0349 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’s third m otion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until July 19 , 2022

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE APPELL EE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon

. Connie J. Flores , the Appell ee ’s attorney, prepare the

Appell ee ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or b efore July 1 9 , 2022

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 1 6 th day of June , 2022

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
The Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature provides detailed information      about planetary names approved by the      International Astronomical Union. Find out more about the history of      planetary nomenclature, how names are approved, how to propose      a name, and more by exploring the pages from the navigation menu. Explore      approved planetary names on each planet by clicking on the icons above.    

## Nomenclature News      

-  Name Approved for Mars: Barlow-  27/2024>09/27/2024 

The IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature has approved the name Barlow for a feature on Mars. For more information, please see the MC-18 nomenclature map in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature.
- New
- Mars
 
-  Four Names Approved for Pluto-  11/2024>09/11/2024 

The IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature has approved the names Harrington Regio, Sharaf Regio, Bower, and Farinella for four features on Pluto. For more information, please see the Pluto nomenclature map in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature.
- Pluto
 
-  Name Approved for Mercury: Stoddart-  26/2024>08/26/2024 

The IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature has approved the name Stoddart for a feature on Mercury. For more information, please see the H-07 nomenclature map in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature.
- Mercury
 
-  Name Approved for the Moon: Mons Malapert-  26/2024>08/26/2024 

The IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature has approved the name Mons Malapert for a feature on the Moon. For more information, please see the LAC-144 nomenclature map in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature.
- Moon
 
-  Name Approved for the Moon: Nam Byeong-Cheol-  14/2024>08/14/2024 

The IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature has approved the name Nam Byeong-Cheol for a feature on the Moon. For more information, please see the LAC-89 nomenclature map in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature.
- Moon
 
-  Names Approved for Mercury: 8 Craters-  13/2024>08/13/2024 

The IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature has approved the names Sontag,Piazzolla,Truffaut,Nasir,Masuka,Carvalho,Makeba,Motonobu for eight craters on Mercury. For more information, please see the H-2, H-4, H-6, and H-10 nomenclature maps in the Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature.
- Mercury
 
        Read More...
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OCEAN OPTIQUE DISTRIBUTORS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         408
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                   182
<INVENTORY>                                    4,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,495
<PP&E>                                         896
<DEPRECIATION>                                 664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,332
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,624
<COMMON>                                       7,230
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,569)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,879
<SALES>                                        3,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,874
<CGS>                                          2,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                114
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 297 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 297

To authorize testimony and representation of former and current Senate 
 employees and representation of Senator Craig in Student Loan Fund of 
                      Idaho, Inc. v. Riley, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              October 9 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony and representation of former and current Senate 
 employees and representation of Senator Craig in Student Loan Fund of 
                      Idaho, Inc. v. Riley, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Student Loan Fund of Idaho, Inc. v. Riley, et al., Case 
        No. CV 94-0413-S-LMB, pending in the United States District Court for 
        the District of Idaho, testimony has been requested from Elizabeth 
        Criner, a former employee of Senator Larry Craig;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent Senators and employees of the Senate 
        with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating 
        to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, be the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Elizabeth Criner, and any other former or current 
Senate employee from whom testimony may be required, are authorized to 
testify in the case of Student Loan Fund of Idaho, Inc. v. Riley, et 
al., except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Senator 
Larry Craig, Elizabeth Criner, and any other Member or employee of the 
Senate in connection with the testimony authorized in section one of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JUDGE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PEDRO PICAZO-SANCHEZ, 

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5895FDB

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE,

AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE

This matter having come before the Court on the stipulated motion to continue the trial

and the pretrial motions deadline and the Court having considered the pleadings of the parties,

the records and files herein, the Court makes the following findings: 

The defendant has been indicted on one count of Conspiracy to Manufacture

Marijuana; one count of Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Distribute; and one count of

Alien in Possession of a Firearm. He faces a mandatory minimum of 10 years in prison with

a maximum of life in prison.

The discovery provided to the defense thus far is significantly voluminous and it is

necessary for the defense to thoroughly review the discovery with the defendant in order to

prepare an effective defense. 

The Court finds that failure to grant a continuance in this matter would deny the

defense the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

Case 3:05-cr-05895-FDB Document 16 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance in

this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial preparation and that these

factors outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a more speedy trial,

within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date be continued from February 27,

2006 to April 24, 2006, at 9:00 am. The period of delay resulting from this continuance from

February 27, 2006, up to and including the new trial date of April 24, 2006, is hereby

excluded for speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pretrial motions due date be extended to

February 16, 2006.

DONE this 18th January, 2006.

A

FRANKLIN D BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cr-05895-FDB Document 16 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 64680.

#### Pressure Castings, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 148038-K and 148039-K (Cleveland).

*312Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of zinc alloy ingots similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58106, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.