alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 59870.

#### F. W. Myers *&*Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 153528-K, etc. (Detroit).

*411Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66649.

#### Schmidt, Pritchard *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/28876 (New York).

*397Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as 1,033 cartons frozen boneless mutton, is similar in all material respects to the beef the subject of *United States*v. *J. H. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), except that the merchandise here involved is mutton, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Erick Larsen Helicinecam, Inc.
262 W Linden Avenue #C
Burbank

, CA 91502

- 2557

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 0394

Dear Mr. Larsen :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
No. 58768.

protest 238281-K (New York).

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Par  Pharmaceutical  Companies,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Scott Tarriff,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




/s/ Scott Tarriff
-----------------
Scott Tarriff
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004
Re:Atrazine MCL Atrazine MCL Atrazine MCL ? 

Melanie Biscoe Melanie Biscoe to: Karl Tupper 01/12/2011 04:39 PM

Hi Karl,

Excellent questions. For these, though, I'll have to refer you to the Office of Water. 

I recommend you call Wynne Miller and or Pamela Barr in the Office of Water 's Office of Groundwater and 

Drinking Water at 202-564-3750.

Melanie Biscoe

Chemical Review Manager

Risk Management and Implementation Branch IV (RMIB IV)

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (PRD)

Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP)

biscoe.melanie@epa.gov

703-305-7106

Karl Tupper Melanie, I've been scouring the Office of Water's... 01/11/2011 06:47:12 PM

From: Karl Tupper <karl@panna.org>

To: Melanie Biscoe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/11/2011 06:47 PM

Subject: Atrazine MCL?

Melanie,

I've been scouring the Office of Water's webpages (water.epa.gov) trying to figure out how they 

came up with 3 ppb as the MCL for atrazine in drinking water. Specific, what study or studies 

form the basis of it, what uncertainty factors were applied, etc. I can't seem to find anything on 

their webpages, but maybe that's becuase the rule predates the internet (it came into effect in 

1992, as best I can tell). Can you point me in the right direction? Are there documents you send 

me or link to or is there someone within OW that you could suggest I contact?

Please let me know! Thanks,

Karl

-- 

Karl A. Tupper, Staff Scientist

Pesticide Action Network North America

49 Powell St., Suite 500, 

San Francisco, CA 94102

office: 415.981.1771 x 314

fax: 415.981.1991

web: http://www.panna.org

blog: http://panna.org/blogs/karl-tupper
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4650-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Washington (FEMA-4650-DR), dated March 29, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on September 29, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Toney L. Raines, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Andrew P. Meyer as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-23174 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001012704
<NAME> UGLY DUCKLING CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              1,652
<SECURITIES>                                       17,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                      61,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                        5,950
<INVENTORY>                                        34,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0<F1>
<PP&E>                                             33,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                      5,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    278,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0<F1>
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          173,562
<OTHER-SE>                                         10,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      278,845
<SALES>                                           142,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  166,357
<CGS>                                              81,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   44,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   29,308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  1,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    10,610
<INCOME-TAX>                                        4,274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 6,336
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (5,254)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        1,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .06
<FN>
<F1>UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET  
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Outdoor Systems, Inc.
Phoenix, Arizona
 
   
     We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
of Outdoor Systems, Inc. on Form S-4 of our report dated February 14, 1997,
except for paragraph f of Note 1 and Note 16 as to which the dates are July 3,
1997 and March 26, 1997, respectively, appearing in the Prospectus, which is
part of this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement, and to the
references to us under the headings "Selected Consolidated Financial and Other
Data" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.
    
 
     Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned
report also included the financial statement schedule of Outdoor Systems, Inc.,
listed in Item 21. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
   
     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement of Outdoor Systems, Inc. on Form S-4 of our report
dated July 25, 1996 relating to the financial statements of Gannett Outdoor
appearing in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-9713).
    
 
   
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    
Phoenix, Arizona
 
   
July 23, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 25, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 18, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 78 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov*, Docket Nos. MC2024-18, CP2024-18.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-23510 Filed 10-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Before the Second Division,

August 26, 1954

No. 58345.

protest 187850-K (Galveston).

#### R. W. Smith *v.*United States,

*346Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel oil-well casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.*(41 C. C. P. A. 121, C. A. D. 540), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 57116.

protest 187419-K (New York).

#### Universal Importing Corp. *v.*United States,

Ekwall, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on decorated chinaware, imported from Germany on July 24, 1951, at 70 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It is claimed that an error was made in the calculation of the foreign inland freight charges, a correction of which would change the valuation of the merchandise so that it would be dutiable at 45 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of April 22, 1948, T. D. 51898.

An examination of the official papers and of the statements made by counsel for the Government and by Irving Goldstein, a witness appearing on behalf of the plaintiff corporation, reveals the following situation: The imported mer--chandise, consisting of 250 dozen fruit plates, 7J4 inches in diameter, was invoiced at a total value of $900, including charges for cartage, inland freight, and insurance in the sum of $40.50. On entry, the latter amount was deducted as non-dutiable, making the total entered value $860 or $3.44 per dozen. The merchandise was appraised as entered, and no appeal for reappraisement was filed. Plaintiff now claims that the correct nondutiable charges are $25.60, which would make the total value of the merchandise $874.40 or $3.49 per dozen.

Paragraph 212, as modified, provides that the reduced rate shall apply to plates “over 6% but not over 7% inches in diameter and valued at more than $3.45 but not more than $5.40 per dozen.” The classification of the instant merchandise under said provision requires that its value be more than $3.45 per dozen. Thus, the issue attempted to be made concerns the value of the merchandise. It is well settled that that issue must be raised by an appeal for reappraisement and not by way of protest. *T. S. Kennedy Co.*v. *United States,*2 Cust. Ct. 404, C. D. 165; *365
      *Phil B. Bekeart Co.*v. *United States,*13 Cust. Ct. 18, C. D. 861; *Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co.*v. *United States,*22 Cust. Ct. 17, C. D. 1150. In the case first cited, the court said (p. 405):

> On consideration it is held that questions of the amounts of values on appraisement must be litigated on reappraisement appeal. Also that that principle applies to the amounts of values which indirectly affect the classification by shifting the merchandise, as here, from one classification bracket to another.

> While an appraisement may be attacked on protest because those making it “proceeded on a wrong principle contrary to law or transcended the powers granted by statute,” *United States*v. *Passavant,*169 U. S. 16, it is limited to that and an attack upon the amount of the appraised value, no question of-law being involved, can only be had on reappraisement appeal.

Since the protest herein attacks the amount of the appraised value, not the validity of the appraisement, it must be dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 57824.

protest 211478-K (New York).

#### Penson & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Prom an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
A89A1898.

#### CLAY v. THE STATE.

(391 SE2d 143)

Decided January 30, 1990.

*Short & Fowler, Thomas S. Bishop,*for appellant.

*H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Charles M. Stines, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Beasley, Judge.

Defendant, convicted of violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-30 (b), appeals from a judgment entered May 9, 1989. His notice of appeal was filed on the 31st day thereafter, June 9, 1989. No motion for an out-of-time appeal was filed.

The out-of-time appeal must be dismissed for failure to follow OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). *Paytee v. State,*190 Ga. App. 291 (380 SE2d 92) (1989); see *Jones v. Perkins,*192 Ga. App. 343 (384 SE2d 927) (1989).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.*
Case No. 14,314.

#### In re TYRREL.

[2 N. B. R. 200 (Quarto, 73).] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 17, 1868.

Bankruptcy — Discharge—Specifications in Opposition.

Vague and general specifications filed in opposition to discharge are insufficient, and a discharge will be granted when the register will have certified conformity to the requirements of the law.

[Cited in Re Carrier. 47 Fed. 440.]

And now comes the creditor, John Williamson, and for grounds of his opposition to the discharge of said bankrupt alleges, upon the examination had, and upon all papers and proceedings herein, and upon his information and belief: First. That said bankrupt has concealed his estate and effects, in wilful •violation and fraud of the bankrupt law. Second. That said bankrupt has per sequence of foregoing, sworn false in his affidavit annexed to his Schedule B, in wilful violation and fraud of the bankrupt law. Third. That said bankrupt has per sequence of specification one, and also concerning the indebtedness of, and the dealings with Wetmore. or Wetmore & Gamble and others, and the disposition of the payments for said indebtedness, and in other particulars, sworn falsely in relation to material facts concerning his estate, in wilful violation and fraud of the bankrupt law. Fourth. That said bankrupt has neglected to deliver to the assignee the property that in fact belonged to him at the time of filing his petition, and has not mentioned the same in his schedules annexed thereto, in wilful violation and fraud of the bankrupt act Fifth. That said bankrupt has neglected to produce before the register, or deliver to the assignee, his books, papers and writings relating to his estate, in wilful violation and fraud of the bankrupt law. Sixth. That said bankrupt has in all his business transactions in effect changed his name from Daniel Tyrrel to J. Tyrrel; that he deals under that name in his business of carpenter, builder and contractor, and is known by that name and not otherwise by most of those with whom he deals; that he has received and earned moneys under such name within four months and for a long period prior thereto, not mentioned and accounted for in his schedules, all in wilful violation -and fraud of the bankrupt law. Seventh. That in contemplation of being and continuing Insolvent and bankrupt, and for the purpose of keeping and concealing his property and the proceeds of said business from his creditors, and preventing the same coming to his assignee, the bankrupt makes claim that his wife is the said carpénter, builder and contractor, and not he; and his said wife, at the instigation and with the connivance of. said bankrupt, falsely and wrongfully makes claim to the property acquired and held by said bankrup't under said name of J. Tyrrel, all in wilful violation and fraud of the bankrupt law. John Williamson, by G. & P. Stillman, his attorneys herein.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The specifications filed in opposition to the discharge are all of them too vague and general, and are insufficient. A discharge will be granted when the register shall have certified eon-' formity.
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/environmentalhealth/quiet-killer-carbon-monoxide.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/environmentalhealth/quiet-killer-carbon-monoxide.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
No. 57838.

protest 155346-K (New York).

#### J. F. Whitney & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.