alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 280 Agreed to May 25, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS

LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL

GROUNDS.

On June 2, 2000, or on such other date as the Speaker of

the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and

Administration of the Senate may jointly designate, the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run

(in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through

the Capitol Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer games

at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be

necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements,

displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other
H. Con. Res. 280—2

restrictions applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the

event.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
March 7, 1960

No. 63948.

protests 321098-K/9267, 321109-K/9283, and 322735-K/9246.

#### J. E. Bernard *&*Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rebearing denied.
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# Wintteb**~tate5** 

# (!Courtof**~eaI5** 

# for !bejf 

# eberaI ([trentt

FURNITUREBRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,



### v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, AND 

### UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee,
AND 

### AMERICANFURNITURE MANUFACTURERS COMMITTEE FORLEGAL TRADE AND 

### VAUGHANBASSETTFURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1059
Appeal from the United States Court ofInternational Trade incase no. 07-CV-0026, Judge Timothy C. Stanceu.



### ONMOTION

Before REYNA, 

### Circuit Judge.FURNITURE BRANDS INTL v. US 2 

### ORDER Defendants-Appellees American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. (collectively, "the Committee for Legal Trade") and Defendant-Appellee United States move for summary affirmance ofthe United States Court of International Trade's judgment dismissing Furniture Brands International, Inc.'s ("Furniture Brands") complaint for failure to state a claim upon which reliefcan be granted. The United States InternationalTrade Commission responds in favor ofsummary affirmance. Furniture Brands opposes. The United States and the Committee for Legal Trade reply. At issue is whether this court's determination in 

### SKF USA, Incorporated v. United Sates Customs and Border Protection, 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009) 

### ("SKF'), forecloses Furniture Brand's appeal.1 Summary disposition of a case "is appropriate, 

### inter alia, when the position ofone party is so clearly correct as a matteroflaw that no substantial questionregardingthe outcome of the appeal exists." 

### Joshua V. 

### United States 17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

1 In 

### SKF, this court concluded that the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (also known as the Byrd Amendment) neither violated the Constitution's equal protection guarantee nor the First Amendment. The Byrd Amendment provides for the distribution of antidumping duties collected by the United States to eligible "affected domestic producers" of the dumped goods. 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a) (2000). An "affected domestic producer" must be "a petitioner or interested party in support of the petition with respect to which an antidumping duty order

. . . has been entered." 

### Id. at § 1675c(b)(1)(A).3 FURNITURE BRANDS INTL v. US Because Furniture Brands raises issues that may not have been determined in 

### SKF, we cannot say that a substantial question regarding the outcome of this case does not exist. Upon considerationthereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are denied.



## FEB 292012 Date

cc: David W. DeBruin, Esq.

s25JosephW. Dorn, Esq. Jessica R. Toplin, Esq. Patrick Gallagher, Esq. FOR THE COURT

lsIJan Horbaly JanHorbaly Clerk
FILED U.S. COURTOFAPPEALS FOR**TH~**FEDERALCIRCUIT 

## FEB 292012

JANHORBALY 

### CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            1284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1986
<ALLOWANCES>                                       391
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          398091
<DEPRECIATION>                                   38853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  397818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         153949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      238322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    397818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 39676
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   228
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12296
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    I, Jack Wagenti, Chief Financial Officer of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  6. This Annual Report on 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 7. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  September 15, 2006.  /s/Jack WagentiJack Wagenti(Secretary, Treasurer)
No. 55036.

#### Intercontinental Coordinated Sales Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 161379-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1208 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 124 ) ll-E-1 0 Docket Number: 

# A-89-1 0

Printed 5/9/2008 10:08:24

AM Sheet 124 of 127P. 2

• ^ s i » [^H^H^^-_-_--r^^____Rc____^^____ ^ BH^^^^oR S 

### c_ n C__-l„ , 5Bgfj|— | 

### II-E-1 0 

# 'C O <__®__(_^©____ <



### _ 3 

### D _ EP AAI R DOC . ' " ' Dat e 

# c-±-ii CONTAC TREPOR T Originato r 

# AAor.^ , CONTACTBY : TELEPHON E £ ( MEETIN G D Othe r NAME , TITL E & ORGANIZATIO N 

### fc _c . \A/_i:k.A. s ADDRES S & TELEPHON E NUMBE R 

### 7 I .-"IH^-Ull PURPOS E O R SUBJEC

T(Giv e project numbe ri f appropriate ) 

# Cos £o-

fV^ M SUMMAR Y Tf^c k S"*Vi t f^ - cOtU^o i V5^i__ £s 

### /^/ / ^lv/t , /,sk_

_AftVt . j"/a vl 

### c..c ( Vi/^ . <-*/..._<<• . -^-y^ - \fcjL\Ji. C0j^ _ 

# h 

# u HJ

ACTIO N IO 

# i Distribution :P. 3

TOTH L P. O
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

       CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of America
Service Group Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 14, 2002



                                         Name: /s/ Michael W. Taylor
                                               ---------------------------------
                                         Title:   Senior Vice President &
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
No. 52795.

#### Kasenit Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 140352-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22699]



[[Page 71347]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2514-029]


Notice of Waiver Period for Water Quality Certification 
Application; Appalachian Power Company

    On September 29, 2023, Appalachian Power Company submitted to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its request 
for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification 
filed with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (Virginia 
DEQ), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 
CFR 121.6 and section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,\1\ we 
hereby notify Virginia DEQ of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 5.23(b).

Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: August 1, 2023.
Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year, August 1, 2024.

    If Virginia DEQ fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the agency 
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: October 3, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22699 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Case 2:06-cv-00869-JLR Document 28 Filed 09/14/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 60313.

protests 278512-K and 278513-K (New York).

#### Indestructible Pearl Bead Makers, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chalk-white stones, not faceted, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CAL-ORE Life Flight, LLC. JXKA142B d/b/a DKAir, LLC. 1 OMJW27 202 Dale Rupert Rd. Crescent City, CA 95531 April25, 2012 Docket Management Facility US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W120140 Washington, DC 20590 Docket (No. FAA-2012-0362) Dear. ms. Klepper: 

### "' 'O· , ,_ t-\ ,,. I:J

CAL-ORE would like to add this information to ourpetition ofthe Federal Administration for exemptionfrom 14 CFRPart 120. CAL-ORE requests an exemption from having to maintain two separate Anti-Drug and Alcohol programs. Currently CAL-ORE maintains Anti-Drug and alcohol programs Part 135 On-Demand Air Charter. Cert. JXKA142B Part91.147 Passenger Carrying-Scenic Flight Tour Operations. Cert. IOMJW27 We were advised thatto operate DKAir, LLC. As a d/b/a (opspec A049) we would need a separate program orbe added to the CA-OREprogram. CAL-OREhas full operational control ofDK, 

### Air, all personnel to maintain and operate the DK. Air aircraft are enrolled in the CAL-OREprograms, all aircraft operated are listed inouropspec A003. The redundancy oftesting would be costlyto us as a small business, both testing fees and monthlymaintenance costs through our consortium. We believe that having one program for all pilots and our maintenance personnel will streamline operations for ourAnti-drug and alcohol program managers making the management and implementation more efficient. The benefit to ourcompany will come in the form ofdecreased cost and more efficient use of employee time. Public safety shall notbe compromised; the program will not change as all safety sensitive employees will continue tobe enrolled and subject to the sameprogramrules as they currently are.Benefits to the public will be to eliminateredundancy, therefore decreasing costs to the American taxpayer, by utilizing the same FAA Anti-Drug and Alcohol Abatement on a single visit annually. Ifadditional information is required, please contact me, cell 707-218-7867

# t2u/v~ Robert Walker ChiefPilot Anti-Drug Program Manager
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 221

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing printing of the brochures entitled

‘‘How Our Laws Are Made’’ and ‘‘Our AmericanGovernment’’, the pocket version of the UnitedStates Constitution, and the document-sized, annotated version of the United States Constitution.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 221

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF DOCUMENTS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the documents referred

5 to in section 2 shall be printed as a House document, in
2

•HCON 221 EH

1 a style and manner determined by the Chair of the Joint

2 Committee on Printing.

3 (b) ADDITIONAL COPIES FOR HOUSE AND SEN4 ATE.—There shall be printed for the use of the House of

5 Representatives and the Senate an aggregate number of

6 copies of the documents printed under subsection (a) not

7 to exceed the lesser of—

8 (1) 2,200,000; or

9 (2) the maximum number of copies for which

10 the aggregate printing cost does not exceed an

11 amount established by the Joint Committee on

12 Printing.

13 SEC. 2. DOCUMENTS DESCRIBED.

14 The documents referred to in this section are as fol15 lows:

16 (1) The 1999 revised edition of the brochure

17 entitled ‘‘How Our Laws Are Made’’.

18 (2) The 1999 revised edition of the brochure

19 entitled ‘‘Our American Government’’.

20 (3) The 20th edition of the pocket version of

21 the United States Constitution.
3

•HCON 221 EH

1 (4) The 1999 edition of the document-sized, an2 notated version of the United States Constitution.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.22

                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                   AMENDMENT 1


This will amend the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated the 17th day of October 2001, by
and between ION Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principle place
of business at 1551 South Washington Avenue, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, (the
"Company") and Cameron Saifi residing at 1407 Deer Path, Mountainside, NJ 07092
(the "Employee").

Effective the 30th day of September 2002, Section 7, paragraph (b) of the
Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:

         (b)      Employee's   employment   may  be   terminated   at  any  time
                  immediately  upon  written  notice  by  the  Company,  without
                  "Cause".  If Employee  is  terminated  by the Company  without
                  "Cause,"  Employee  shall be entitled  to a severance  payment
                  equal to (i) a payment of salary for the next twelve months as
                  if the Agreement had not been terminated. Employee and Company
                  agree  that  such  severance  payment  shall  also  constitute
                  liquidated  damages  and  is  a  reasonable  approximation  of
                  Employee's damages as a result of such termination.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have duly executed and
delivered this Agreement as of the day and year shown above.

                                  ION NETWORKS, INC.



                                  By:               /s/ Stephen M. Deixler
                                           -----------------------------------
                                                    Stephen M. Deixler
                                                    Chairman of the Board


                                                    /s/ Cameron Saifi
                                                    Cameron Saifi
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kelly Fielder, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Razor Resources Inc..
      for the year ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Razor Resources Inc.                                                             

Dated: August 13, 2009



| | /s/
      Kelly Fielder                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Kelly Fielder                                                                                    
| | President, Secretary and Director                                                                
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
| | Razor Resources Inc.                                                                             



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Razor Resources
Inc. and will be retained by Razor Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE

TO THE BOARD

August 7, 2018

Mr. Ronald A. DeMyers

Eight Saint Andrews Court

Flanders, New Jersey 07836

Dear Mr. DeMyers:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after

consultation with the Director ofthe Division of Supervision and Regulation, has

approved your request pursuant to section 19 ofthe Federal Deposit Insurance Act1 to

become an institution-affiliated party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Company (“State Farm”), Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan holding company

(“SLHC”). This approval is limited to your being an institution-affiliated party of State

Farm, including by working for State Farm or working for or owning an independently

owned agency that sells State Farm insurance products and products for State Farm’s

wholly owned subsidiary, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington,

Illinois. If you seek to work for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), or to

work for or own an independently owned agency that sells products for another SLHC or

BHC, you must obtain the Board’s approval prior to working for such SLHC, BHC, or

agency.

This action is based on all the facts ofrecord and the representations made

by you to the Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented

could result in a different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff.

This action is also based on all commitments provided by you in support of your request.

These commitments are conditions imposed in writing in connection with the Board’s

decision and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. This action

is also conditioned specifically on your receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals

related to your proposal and compliance with any terms and conditions that may be

imposed in connection with such approvals. Additionally, if you are convicted of, or

enter into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach oftrust,

1 12 U.S.C. § 1829.
or money laundering in the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC

or BHC, or to work for or own any independently owned agency that sells products for an

SLHC or a BHC, including any agency that sells State Farm and State Farm Bank

products.

Sincerely yours,

Ann E. Misback

Secretary ofthe Board