alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 114

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
    issued as a testimonial to the Nation's tireless commitment to 
reuniting America's missing children with their families, and to honor 
   the memories of those children who were victims of abduction and 
                                murder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1999

 Mr. Boehlert submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
    issued as a testimonial to the Nation's tireless commitment to 
reuniting America's missing children with their families, and to honor 
   the memories of those children who were victims of abduction and 
                                murder.

Whereas every 40 seconds a child is reported missing, and each year in the 
        United States, up to 1,000,000 children are reported missing;
Whereas the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, was established 
        15 years ago as the Nation's resource center and clearinghouse for 
        information on America's missing children, and issued a national call to 
        action requesting the participation of every citizen to assist in the 
        search for the country's missing youth;
Whereas it is the collective responsibility of all Americans to better protect 
        the Nation's children, as well as to assist in the search for those who 
        are missing; and
Whereas the issuance of a stamp bearing the image of a missing child, sends a 
        powerful message, at its unveiling and on each letter with which it is 
        sent; Americans will not tolerate the victimization of their children, 
        and not rest until each missing child is reunited with his or her 
        family: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the United States 
        Postal Service to honor all missing children; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Commission of the United States 
        Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster General that 
        such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
. The Effect &Jeanne t he Lamest Check 

Tlrid b@m I real statement Ofa Nor-west customer. These were the only hansactions during this 

p-id. Zt llre liwen organized here according to date and N &t’s policy of clearing the largest check 

first. A cwtatn&s statements are usually not smasy to u stand . T 

On April 3O,+r checks come in. By clearing the largest f&t fthe $20.721, the three smaller chekcs 

bounce and the customer is charged $63 @ three ooerdrafts. Note that the three smaller check ( $7.23, 

$6.15, and $635, total = $19.73) could have been paidfrom the $24.68 balance and left only the largest 

($20.72) to bounce. Note also that the wne’day the customer is charged the $63, she has two SSZdirect 

deposit checks entered, as she had regularly done. 

DATE 

4/25/97 

4/26/97 

4/29/97 

4/29/97 

4mVW 

4/29/97 

4/29/97 

4/29/97 

l &W/97 

* 4/30/97 

* 4130197 

* 4130197 

5/l/97 

5/l/97 

5/l/97 

5/l/97 

TRANSACTION 

Beginning balance 

Check 

Card Purchase 

Check 

Check 

Check i 

Check 

Check 

Check 

Check 

Check 

AMOUNT 

$12.31 

$13.41 

$47.11 

$20.74 

$19.08 

$12.52 

$8.57 

$20.72 

$7.23 

$6.35 

Check $6.15 

Overdraft Charge $63.00 

Direct Deposit -SSI $470.00 

Direct Deposit - SSI $470.00 

ATM w/draw $ 20.00 

BALANCE 

$158.42 

$146.11 

$132.70 

$85.59 

$64.85 

$45.77 

$33.25 

$24.68 

$ 3.96 

- $ 3.27 

- $ 9.62 

- $15.77 

- $78.77 

$391.23 

$861.23 

$841.23
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Triple Crown Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

Lawrenceville, Georgia 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (No.333-131075) of Triple Crown Media, Inc. of our report dated October 10, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Triple Crown Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries appearing in the Company’s AnnualReport on this Form 10-K. Our report relating to the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

October 10, 2008
No. 68562.

protests 61/6699, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Joseph A. Paredes & Co. and Slater Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the articles in question, identified on the invoices as items 121, 135, 151, 153, 400, and 404, are utensils chiefly used in the home for the convenience and comfort of the household, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 33.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, C. E. Andrews, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution orservicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered bythis annual report, of SLM Student Loan Trust 2005-6

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, theinformation in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thedistribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee bythe servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and upon theannual compliance statement included in the report and required to be deliveredto the trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer hasfulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.             The reports disclose allsignificant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimumservicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent publicaccountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform SingleAttestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in thesereports.

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 

/s/ C.E. ANDREWSC.E. AndrewsPresident and Chief Financial OfficerSLM Funding LLC,as the Depositor for SLM Student Loan Trust 2005-6

 

----
No. 59292.

protests 256591-K, etc. (New York).

#### Herzman Scarfs, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*244Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,918,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,917,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                   224,256
<INVENTORY>                                  7,464,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,048,183
<PP&E>                                       8,463,863
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,934,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,302,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,624,965
<BONDS>                                        675,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,964
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,919,459
<SALES>                                     29,383,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,383,889
<CGS>                                       23,020,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,020,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,075,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                276,587
<INCOME-TAX>                                   120,677
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            155,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   155,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 81 [Docket: EPA-R10-0AR-2010-0294] Determination ofAttainment for PM10 for the SandpointPMlO Nonattainment Area, Idaho AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The EPAproposes to determine that the Sandpoint nonattainment area in Idaho attains the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ofless than or equal to a nominal ten micrometers (PMlO). DATES: Comments must be received on or before [insert date 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register]. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-0AR-201O-0294, by any ofthe following methods: • www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Email: body.steve@epa.gov • Mail: Steve Body, U.S. EPA Region 10, Office ofAir, Waste and Toxics (AWT-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle WA, 98101 • Hand Delivery/ Courier: U.S. EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle WA,98101. Attention: Steve Body, Office ofAir, Waste and Toxies, AWT - 107. Sueh2 deliveries are only accepted during normal hours ofoperation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries ofboxed information. Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section ofthis Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to submit comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Body at telephone number: (206) 553­ 0782, e-mail address: body.steve@epa.gov,or the above EPA, Region 10 address. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the direct final action, ofthe same title, which is located in the Rules section ofthis Federal Register. EPA is approving the attainment detennination as a direct final rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the preamble to the direct final rule. IfEPAreceives no adverse comments, EPA will not take further action on this proposed rule. IfEPA receives adverse comments, EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that ifwe receive

### 3 adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section ofthis rule and ifthat provision may be severed from the remainder ofthe rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions ofthe rule that are not the subject ofan adverse comment. 

## <""(

## t.~l t,o DATED:

___--'--__

# ~~=71{j.-**~** -oE"t-..l**\-:,~.** 

# # ..**~\!'"Q.R..~oN ~~~** **\~~f\""L.** pM. \N,**~'t'''--I\'t"()**

## It

Region 10
(Reap. Dec. 10605)

#### Castelazo & Associates, a/c General Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6278.

(Decided October 15, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> *4251. That the above entitled appeal for reappraisement covers Klink; plywood exported from New Guinea.

> 2. That the said merchandise was entered or withdrawn from Customs warehouse for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and was therefore appraised under Section 402(b) of the Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session; said merchandise not being identified in the Pinal List published in T.D. 54521.

> 3. That at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of New Guinea, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the unit invoice values, net packed.

> 4. That the above appeal for reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export ■value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in issue and that such value was the invoice unit value, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** **

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

** **

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Steven G. Manson, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

 

(1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
| *Date: *November  14, 2003 | *By /s/ STEVEN G. MANSON* |   |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                            | *Steven G. Manson*        |
|                            | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"), I, A. Brian Davis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ A. Brian Davis
----------------------------------------------------
A. Brian Davis
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 2, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of America Service GroupInc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.Dated: August 9, 2006       Name: /s/ Michael W. Taylor     Title: Senior Vice President &    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period
ended  September  30,  2005  (the  "Report")  of  FirstFed  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof, the undersigned,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


\s\ B. K. Goodwin, III                                  November 14, 2005
---------------------------------------------           ------------------------
B. K. Goodwin, III, Chief Executive Officer             Date


\s\ Lynn J. Joyce                                       November 14, 2005
---------------------------------------------           ------------------------
Lynn J. Joyce, Chief Financial Officer                  Date

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.  The  information
furnished  herein  shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  nor shall it be deemed  incorporated  by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           AMERICA SERVICE GROUP INC.

                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              QUARTER ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30,            SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              -------------            -------------
                                                           2001         2000          2001         2000
                                                           ----         ----          ----         ----
<S>                                                      <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                                        $  (996)     $ 2,102      $(17,037)     $ 5,611

Preferred stock dividends                                     --         (165)         (163)        (489)
                                                        -------------------------------------------------
Numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share -
   income (loss) attributable to common stockholders     $  (996)     $ 1,937      $(17,200)     $ 5,122
                                                        =================================================
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share -
   weighted average shares                                 5,428        3,925         5,245        3,796

Effect of dilutive securities                                 --        1,725            --        1,706
                                                        -------------------------------------------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted       5,428        5,650         5,245        5,502
                                                        =================================================
Basic earnings (loss) per share                          $ (0.18)     $  0.49      $  (3.28)     $  1.35
                                                        =================================================
Diluted earnings (loss) per share                        $ (0.18)     $  0.37      $  (3.28)     $  1.02
                                                        =================================================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.23


         January 8, 2003
ION Network's Logo

ION Networks, Inc.
1551 S. Washington Ave.
Piscataway, NJ 088854
         TO:      Cameron Saifi

         RE:      Salary Holdback

         Dear Cameron,

         In order to maintain your continued loyalty,  focus and cooperation the
         Compensation  Committee of the Board of Directors  has agreed to change
         the salary  reduction  you  received on January 1, 2003 to a "temporary
         salary holdback".

         Annualized Salary:  $186,000
         Percent Holdback:   20%
         Reduced Payout:     $148,800

         This  holdback  will  remain in  effect  until  the  company  reaches a
         recovery event such as  profitability,  a financing  event, a merger or
         acquisition,  or upon your  involuntarily  termination  for other  than
         cause or performance. Following such an event, you would be entitled to
         recoup all salary that had been  held-back  including  the two weeks of
         foregone  pay withheld  during the  shutdown  periods less any taxes or
         deductions required by law.

         This  action is  justified  in terms of the  dedication  level you have
         demonstrated  to date and will  certainly be  underscored by the "above
         and beyond"  efforts  that will be  required  of you over the  upcoming
         quarter.

         Please  note  that  this  letter  does not  constitute  a  contract  of
         employment nor is it intended to void the terms of any valid  contracts
         that may be in existence.

         Please let me know if you have any questions.

         Sincerely,

         /s/ Terri Rogers

         Terri Rogers, PHR
         Human Resources Manager