alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 67247.

protests 59/9669, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Cade-Grayson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 376 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.376
                                      Agreed to October 19, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas our rights and liberties are rooted in the cherished documents 
  that gave birth to our nation, those being the Declaration of 
  Independence and the United States Constitution with its Bill of 
  Rights;

Whereas the patriot James Madison, fourth President of the United 
  States, was the major author of the Virginia Plan, the model and the 
  basis for that United States Constitution that emerged from the 
  Constitutional Convention in 1787;

Whereas James Madison kept detailed written records of the debates and 
  compromises that were in integral part of that Convention of 1787, 
  which records were published only after the death of all delegates to 
  the Convention;

Whereas James Madison wrote many of the newspaper articles now known as 
  the Federalist Papers, outlining why States should endorse the new 
  Constitution and enduring as some of the best arguments for our form 
  of government;

Whereas James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights into the 1st 
  Congress of the United States, whereupon the first ten amendments to 
  the Constitution were adopted; and

Whereas it is altogether fitting that the 16th day of March, the 
  birthday of the distinguished founding father, James Madison, would 
  serve as a fitting reminder of Liberty Day, a celebration of the 
  Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, where 
  our unalienable rights and liberties are enumerated: Now, therefore, 
  be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
        (1) a Liberty Day should be celebrated each year in the United 
    States as a remembrance of both the freedom that Americans were 
    given in the Declaration of Independence and the extraordinary 
    rights and liberties that Americans were given in their 
    Constitution; and
        (2) all elected and previously-elected representatives of the 
    people who voluntarily give of their time to speak to Americans 
    about those founding documents, in furtherance of that remembrance 
    of our freedom, our rights and our liberties, deserve our thanks.
  Attest:

                          Jeff Trandahl,

                                                                       
                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
              By

                                                                       
                                                          Deputy Clerk.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
-                      - 灾难与援助
                    -  灾难与援助 
                    -  目前面临的灾难                        -  California Severe Storms 
                      -  隐士峰(小牛峡谷火灾) 
                      -  Maine Severe Storms  
                      -  Michigan Severe Storms 
                      -  Rhode Island Severe Storms (December 2023) 
                      -  Rhode Island Severe Storms (January 2024) 
                      -  Washington Wildfires 
                      -  森林火灾防治行动 
                      -  Wrangell Cooperative Association Severe Storm 
                      -  所有灾难声明 
                    -  灾难后获得援助 
                    -  Tools to Recover 
                    -  灾难 

# 目前面临的灾难

                            - English 
                            - Español 
                            - Français 
                            - Kreyòl 
                            - 한국어 
                            - Tiếng Việt 
                            - 简体中文 

灾难可能以各种形式出现。FEMA会对所有宣布的国内灾害和紧急情况作出反应,无论是自然还是人为的。

****请登录** **Ready.gov****逐步为自己和家人做好面对危险天气的准备工作。****

## 对当前灾难的回应

FEMA有数以千计的工作人员被部署到全国各地和美国领土的灾害行动中,以回应联邦援助的请求。

FEMA保持着一支由4000多名预备役人员组成的骨干队伍,以部署到灾区,此外还有数千名突击能力强的部队成员 来自 其他联邦机构,在需要时可以被召唤去应对。

在这些正在进行的重大灾害声明中,寻找资源和当前信息,包括如何申请联邦援助。

伊利诺伊州强风暴

### 搜索你的所在地

通过 搜索你的所在地查找有关灾害和应急管理的最相关信息。

## 更多资源

访问我们的 灾难信息(Disaster Information) 页面,了解:
                        - 正式  宣布过程
                        - 对于  个人  以及  公共基建 的援助
                        -   志愿者和捐赠 的途径
                        - 查找  灾难报告和数据
                        - 向 FEMA 发送灾害相关文件的最佳方式

最近更新时间  三月 6, 2024

返回顶部
**Exhibit 32.2**

#### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SafetyProducts Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, David F.Myers, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.
| Dated: March 23, 2007 | By:    |                                               | /s/ David F. Myers, Jr. |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | David F. Myers, Jr.                                |
|                  |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                  |   | Secretary and Director                             |
|                  |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

 

**A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY ALEXANDER ROSE, a/k/a Michael

Colfield, a/k/a Anthony Brown,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-93-73-BO, CA-97-151-4-BO)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Alexander Rose, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Alexander Rose filed an untimely notice of appeal. We

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

sixty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The

only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court

extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on November 14, 1997;

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed at the earliest on January

31, 1998, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(c), which is beyond the sixty day

appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note a timely appeal or

obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without

jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We

therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                SUBSIDIARIES OF HEALTHCARE IMAGING SERVICES, INC.
                               as at June 30, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                         State of Incorporation           Names under which do business
------------------                         ----------------------           -----------------------------
<S>                                        <C>                              <C>
1.   HealthCare Imaging                    New Jersey                       N/A
     Services of Wayne, Inc.
2.   HealthCare Imaging                    Pennsylvania                     N/A
     Services of Rittenhouse
     Square, Inc.
3.   HealthCare Imaging                    Maryland                         N/A
     Services of Catonsville, Inc.
4.   HIS PPM Co.                           Delaware                         N/A
5.   HIS Imaging Co.(1)                    Delaware                         Monroe Diagnostic Imaging
                                                                            Mainland Diagnostic Imaging
                                                                            Echelon Diagnostic Imaging
                                                                            Bloomfield Diagnostic Imaging
6.   HIS Clinical Research Co.,            Delaware                         N/A
     LLC

</TABLE>

--------

(1)  HIS Imaging Co. was merged with and into HIS Imaging LLC, another
     wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary of the Company, effective July 1,
     1999, with HIS Imaging LLC being the surviving company.

                                       23
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7725

HARVEY EUGENE PRITCHETT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES S. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv00213-AMD)

Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey Eugene Pritchett, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Harvey Eugene Pritchett seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pritchett has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# Rumor: FEMA will only give assistance to one person per household. 

## Fact

Generally, FEMA provides all eligible assistance to one application to assist all members of the pre-disaster household. However, FEMA will evaluate the unique needs of eligible survivors to include households that may be separated due to the disaster, households made up of roommates, or when there is a financial relationship between an owner living in a home with boarders or renters.

## Related Links

                                - Return to the Common Disaster-Related Rumors page

Last updated August 18, 2023

Return to top
PROJECT FUNDED BY

Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law

FUNDING AVAILABLE THROUGH FEMA’S
BUILDING RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND
COMMUNITIES PROGRAM

INVESTING IN
AMERICA
No. 51807.

#### Julius Kayser & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 25250-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 78]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ078.111]

[[Page 123 STAT. 2085]]

Public Law 111-78
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street 
    in Key West, Florida, as the ``Sidney M. Aronovitz United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2009 -  [H.R. 2913]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 301 Simonton Street in Key 
West, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Sidney M. 
Aronovitz United States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sidney M. 
Aronovitz United States Courthouse''.

    Approved October 19, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2913:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-240 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            July 31, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS MANUEL MORAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

THOMAS E. HIGGINS, Attorney, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-17503 

D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00613-JGZ 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 2, 2020**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Manuel Moran appeals pro se from the district court’s summary 

judgment in his diversity action alleging state law claims against his former 

attorney. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the 

district court’s decision on cross-motions for summary judgment. JL Beverage 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-17503 

Co., LLC v. Jim Beam Brands Co., 828 F.3d 1098, 1104 (9th Cir. 2016). We 

affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant because 

Moran failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant’s 

conduct was the proximate cause of any injury. See Glaze v. Larsen, 83 P.3d 26, 

29 (Ariz. 2004) (en banc) (elements of a legal malpractice claim); KB Home 

Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co., 340 P.3d 405, 412 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014)

(elements of a fraud claim); Trustmark Ins. Co. v. Bank One, Ariz., NA, 48 P.3d 

485, 491 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002) (elements of an unjust enrichment claim); Baines v. 

Superior Court, 688 P.2d 1037, 1041 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984) (elements of a claim 

under Arizona’s racketeering statute); see also Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2314.04(A) 

(permitting private cause of action for racketeering claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to deny defendant’s 

cross motion for summary judgment on the basis of defendant’s failure to adhere to 

the local rules. See Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1223 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(standard of review for district court’s compliance with its local rules).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 4(e)
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

          The undersigned, the trustees of TARGETS TRUST X, desiring to form a
business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. Section 3810,
hereby certify as follows:

          (a) The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the "Trust")
     is "TARGETS TRUST X".

          (b) The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which
     has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows:

          Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware
          1201 Market Street
          Wilmington, Delaware  19801

          (c) This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of
     filing.

Dated:  March 10, 2000
                                        /s/ MICHAEL J. DAY
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Michael J. Day, Regular Trustee

                                        /s/ CHARLES W. SCHARF
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Charles W. Scharf, Regular Trustee

                                         /s/ MARK I. KLEINMAN
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Mark I. Kleinman, Regular Trustee

                                     CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE,
                                     as Delaware Trustee


                                     By:  /s/ DENIS KELLY
                                        -----------------------------------
                                     Name:   Denis Kelly
                                     Title:  Assistant Vice President

                                     SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HOLDINGS
                                     INC., as Sponsor

                                     By:  /s/ MICHAEL J. DAY
                                        -----------------------------------
                                     Name:  Michael J. Day
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |                         |                              |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Date:      May 13, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Deanie      J. Underwood |
|                    | Deanie      J. Underwood     |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer |

----

----
<PAGE>   1

                              CAMBREX CORPORATION
                           ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                          REVISED SCHEDULE OF PARTIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                                       TITLE                       DATE OF AGREEMENT
----                                     ------------------------------------------    -----------------
<S>                                      <C>                                           <C>
James A. Mack..........................  President and Chief Executive Officer             02/01/90
Claes Glassell.........................  Vice President, Cambrex and                       10/12/94
                                           President, Pharmaceutical Group
Steven M. Klosk........................  Executive Vice President, Administration          10/21/92
Peter E. Thauer........................  Vice President, Law and Environment,              08/28/89
                                           General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Salvatore J. Guccione..................  Vice President, Corporate Development             12/14/95
Douglas H. MacMillan...................  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer        04/14/97
Thomas N. Bird.........................  Vice President, Cambrex                           07/23/99
                                           President, Biosciences Group
John VanHulle..........................  Vice President, Cambrex                           07/23/99
                                           President, Specialty and
                                           Fine Chemicals Group
</TABLE>

                                       65