alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,836
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,087
<INVENTORY>                                      6,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,679
<PP&E>                                       1,660,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,591,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,490
<BONDS>                                      1,400,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,236
<OTHER-SE>                                     643,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,591,539
<SALES>                                      1,098,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,098,529
<CGS>                                          630,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  630,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               264,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,228
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 53,205
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 30, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00551-CV 

THOMAS G. BROWN D/B/A B & B CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant 

V. 

RICHARD CROW AND FIRST STATE BANK OF TEXAS, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court 

Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 56,631 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek 

Opinion by Justice Reichek 

By this appeal, Thomas G. Brown d/b/a B & B Construction Company challenges the trial 

court’s April 22, 2019 order granting in part and denying in part First State Bank of Texas’s motion 

for summary judgment. Because the order did not dispose of all of Brown’s claims against the 

Bank and did not address Brown’s claims against Richard Crow, we questioned our jurisdiction 

over the appeal. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (subject to 

mostly statutory exceptions, appeals may only be taken from final judgments that dispose of all 

parties and claims). Both Brown and the Bank filed jurisdictional letter briefs, and neither disputes 

claims remain pending. Accordingly, because claims remain pending, we lack jurisdiction and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. 

 

190551F.P05 

 

/Amanda L. Reichek/ 

AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

THOMAS G. BROWN D/B/A B & B 

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant 

No. 05-19-00551-CV V. 

RICHARD CROW AND FIRST STATE 

BANK OF TEXAS, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District 

Court, Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 56,631. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek, 

Justices Schenck and Osborne participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellees Richard Crow and First State Bank of Texas recover their costs, 

if any, of this appeal from appellant Thomas G. Brown d/b/a B & B Construction Company. 

Judgment entered August 30, 2019.
No. 60316.

protest 267131-K (New York).

#### Gematex Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
**Management's
        Assertion Concerning Compliance**
 **with
        USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**
   March
        13,
        2006
  As
        of and
        for the year ended December 31, 2005, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assocation
        (the "Company") has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
        standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
        Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP")
        solely as they relate to standard VII, Insurance Policies (the "Applicable
        Standard"). The Company uses subservicing organizations to perform the servicing
        obligations subject to minimum servicing
        standards I-VI of USAP.
  As
        of and
        for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and errors
        and
        omissions policies in the amounts of $250,000,000 and $25,000,000
        respectively.
  Attached
        to this Management Assertion are the independent auditors' reports on the subservicing
        organizations' compliance with the minimum servicing standards related to
        the
        servicing obligations performed.
  /s/
                  Kim Greaves
              /s/
                Jim MillerKim
                Greaves
              Jim
                MillerVice
                President
              Vice
                PresidentJPMorgan
                Chase Bank, N.A.
              JPMorgan
                Chase Bank, N.A./s/
                Scott PowellScott
                PowellSenior
                Vic ePresidentJPMorgan
                Chase Bank, N.A.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Leonhard Dreimann, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Salton, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended October 1, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Salton, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Leonhard Dreimann
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Leonhard Dreimann
                                            Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2005

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Salton, Inc. and will be retained by Salton, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       46
Before the Second Division,

March 3, 1955

No. 58794.

protest 212086-K (New York).

#### Gen. Mtrs. Overseas Operations and Baker, Irons & Dockstader, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of 2-watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57879, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 67684.

#### D. C. Andrews & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/12056-12284 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of flashbulbs the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 64250, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

PARTNER JET INC. ) DOCKET OST-2014- 

 ) 

for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit pursuant ) 

to 49 U.S.C. § 41301 and exemption ) 

authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 ) 

(Canada-U.S. charter service) ) 

_________________________________________ )

MOTION OF PARTNER JET INC.

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr.

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500

(202) 747-5212

john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for PARTNER JET INC.

March 28, 2014
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

PARTNER JET INC. ) DOCKET OST-2014- 

 ) 

for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit pursuant ) 

to 49 U.S.C. § 41301 and exemption ) 

authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 ) 

(Canada-U.S. charter service) ) 

_________________________________________ )

MOTION OF PARTNER JET INC.

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. 

§ 302.12, Partner Jet Inc. respectfully moves to withhold from public 

disclosure the contents of Confidential Exhibit A filed simultaneously with 

the above-captioned application. In accordance with Rule 12, the exhibit has 

been marked “Confidential” and is being filed under seal.

Confidential Exhibit A contains financial and operational information 

relating to the applicant’s projections for U.S. service. It incorporates 

private, financial and commercial information of a type that is not usually 

disclosed to the public, and it is being provided to the Department solely in 

support of the carrier's application. Disclosure of this information would 

cause material harm to the applicant’s competitive position.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                   VANS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended
February 28, 2004 of Vans, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary H.
Schoenfeld, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Gary H. Schoenfeld*
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gary H. Schoenfeld
                                            President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            April 5, 2004

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Vans, Inc. and will be retained by Vans, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before Chief Judge Rao,

May 15, 1967

No. R67/75.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., of L. A. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R63/15540 (Los Angeles).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *919Lollytogs, *Ltd.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 608, Reap. Dec. 11073), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise (children’s clothing) and that said value is represented by the invoice unit f.o.b. values, net packed, exclusive of any additional charges or commissions.
Before the Third Division,

January 5, 1948

No. 52095.

protests 970851-G, etc. (New York).

#### Kwong Mee Yuen et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Certain items of the merchandise stipulated to consist of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) were held dutiable at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges. Other items of the merchandise stipulated to consist of drugs the same as those involved in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 208

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 27, 1999

Received and referred to the Committee on Finance

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be

no increase in Federal taxes in order to fund additional

Government spending.

Whereas Federal taxes are at their highest peacetime level in

history, taking 20.6 percent of the gross domestic product;

Whereas the typical American family pays 36 percent of its

income in Federal, State, and local taxes—more than it

spends on food, housing, and clothing combined;
2

HCON 208 RFS

Whereas in 1999 governments at all levels will collect

$10,298 for every man, woman, and child in the United

States;

Whereas since 1989 the Federal per capita tax burden has

increased 27 percent;

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office forecasts that the

productivity of American workers—and controlled Federal spending—will create a non-Social Security surplus

of $996,000,000,000 over the next 10 years;

Whereas the House of Representatives voted on May 26,

1999, to protect Social Security and Medicare by passing

the Social Security lock box by a vote of 416 to 12; and

Whereas Congress must protect Social Security and Medicare

by controlling Federal spending, rather than by increasing taxes on any Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that there

3 should be no increase in Federal taxes in order to fund

4 additional Government spending.

Passed the House of Representatives October 26,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A 17A 0952. W A Y N E A N D R EW FAMI LY HARRI GAN J R. et a l. v. A M E R IC A N
HOMES 4 RENT PROPERTI ES EI GHT, LLC.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a di s p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad v ers e ru l i n g, W ay ne An d rew Fam i ly Harri g an , J r., as b en efi ci ary , an d Ro n al d

Eu g en e Fam il y Po u , J r., as t ru s t ee o f J M H Freed o m Tru s t

, ap p eal ed t o t h e s t at e co u rt

, wh i ch en t ered a wri t o f po s s es s i o n i n fav o r o f p l ai n t i ff A m eri can Ho m es 4 Ren t

Pro p ert i es Ei g ht

, LLC, o n No v em b er 1 4, 20 1 6

. Harri g an an d Po u t h en fi l ed a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal o n Decem

b er 1

, 2 0 16 . W e l ack ju ri s di ct io n fo r t wo reas o n s

. Fi rs t

, b ecau se th e o rd er at i s su e d i s p os es of a d e no v o ap peal fro m a m ag i s t rat e

c o u r t d eci s i o n , Harri gan an d Po u were req u ired t o fo l lo w t h e d i s cret io n ary a p p e a l

p ro ced ures t o o b t ai n rev i ew b efo re t h i s Co u rt

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 1 ); S t r a ch a n

v. M e r i t o r M o r t g a g e Co r p

. E a s t

, 2 16 Ga. Ap p

. 8 2 (4 5 3 SE2 d 1 1 9 ) (1 99 5 ). Th ei r

fai l u re t o d o s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s ap peal

. Seco n d

, t h is ap p eal i s u n t i m el y

. Al t h o u gh a no t ice o f ap p eal g en eral l y m ay b e

fi led wi t h i n t h i r t y d a y s o f en t ry o f t h e ord er s o u gh t t o b e ap p eal ed

, ap p eal s fro m ju d g m en t s i n d i s p o s s es so ry a c t i o n s m u s t be fi led wi t h in s ev en d ay s o f t h e d at e t h e ju d g m en t was en t ered

. See O CGA § 44 -7 -5 6 ; Ra y M. W r i g h t, In c. v. Jo n es , 2 3 9 Ga.
Ap p . 5 2 1

, 52 2 -5 2 3 (5 2 1 SE2 d 4 5 6 ) (1 99 9 ). H arri g an an d Po u ’ s ap p eal i s u n t i m el y ,

as i t was fi l ed 1 7 d ay s aft er t h e s t at e co u rt ’ s o rd er was en t ered

. January 20, 2017Fo r t h es e reas on s , t h i s ap p eal i s DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct io n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/20/2017
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 5, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.111 Foreign Banking Offices in U.S. 1** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. P68/100.

protests 62/6236, etc. (New York).

#### Parkell Co. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of copper bands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Parkell Co.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 285, C.D. 2790), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### Marinshaw, Richard From: Dejanovic, Zorica [ZDejanovic@city.cleveland.oh.us] 

### Sent: Thursday, August02, 2007 1:50 PM To: Marinshaw, Richard 

### Subject: 13-18-00-0838 P005 dimensions: 3 X 8 Zonca Dejanovic Environmental Specialist aeveland Deparbnent of Public Health Division ofAirQuality 1925 St. ClairAvenue, Cleveland, OH 44114 Office: 216.664.2184 - Fax: 216.420.80<17**~~j!jilllQvi@~ity~cle.'Le!~!1d.o1!,us. 'fl'Io!W.cl!l.lI~ela!1d_IlQ!l!t!:l** . .P!9 Serving as Ohio EPAAgency 13 for Cuyahoga COunty



### 8/2/2007 Page 1of1

### Marinshaw, Richard From; Marinshaw, Richard Sent: Wednesday, July25,20077:08AM To; 'dhearne@city.cleveland.oh.us' Cc: mulrine.phil@epa.gov Subject: Additional Information on Chromium Plating Operations David Hearne Chief of Engineering Cleveland Department of Public Health Division of Air Quality 1925 St. ClairAvenue Cleveland, OH 44114 David, 

### Page 1of 1

Nowthat we have started digging into the information we have on each plant, I realize that we do not have what we need for another electroplating plant in Cleveland -- Manufacturers Plating Company, Inc. We have a copy of the permit, but still need afew otherthings. Anychance you could send that to us? I have listed below the information needed. We do not necessarily need all of the documentation (e.g., permitapplication), but if it would be easierto send that than to extract the specific things we need, that is fine. Anyway, I have listed below the specifics. Manufacturers Plating Company, Inc. 1859 East 63rd Street Cleveland, OH 44103 Facility 

### 10: 13-18-00-0838 Data needed for:

- UndyliteAutomatic Chrome Plating line (P002), and

- Plastic Plating Line (Z002) Specific data neededfor each chromium electroplating tank:

- Recitifiercapacity (Amps)

- Annual operating hours -- actual/typical and maximum allowable Thanks again foryour help and let me know if you have any questions about this. Rick Marinshaw Richard J. Marinshaw, P.E. RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road PO Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 (919) 316-3735



### 712512007
No. 60310.

protests 263028-K, etc. (New York).

#### Zanadu Mfg. Corp. and Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*403Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**1998-  potato_stocks_12.15.98potato_stocks_05.14.98potato_stocks_04.14.98potato_stocks_03.13.98potato_stocks_02.13.98potato_stocks_01.13.98

**
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 160 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 160

   Providing a sense of the Congress regarding the reduction of the 
         national debt of the United States held by the public.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 1999

  Mr. Ehlers (for himself, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Camp, and Mr. 
  LoBiondo) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing a sense of the Congress regarding the reduction of the 
         national debt of the United States held by the public.

Whereas the national debt of the United States held by the public is $3.619 
        trillion as of fiscal year 1999,
Whereas the Federal budget is projected to produce a surplus each year in the 
        next 10 fiscal years, and
Whereas refunding taxes and reducing the national debt held by the public will 
        assure continued economic growth and financial freedom for future 
        generations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the national debt held by the 
public should be reduced from $3.619 trillion to a level below $1.61 
trillion by fiscal year 2009.
                                 <all>
```