alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

# DATES:

Date of notice: October 24, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 16, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 29 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-12 and CP2024-12.                

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,

Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2023-23440 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 99.2

            JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP. ANNOUNCES SPECIAL DIVIDEND

Mifflintown, PA - The Board of Directors of the Juniata Valley Financial Corp.
(OTC-BB: JUVF.OB), recently declared a $1.00 per share Special Cash Dividend
which cannot be used for the Dividend Reinvestment Program. This dividend is
above the normal dividend declared by the Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and is
payable on April 1, 2005, to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2005.


The Juniata Valley Bank was chartered in 1867 and has 11 offices serving
Juniata, Mifflin, Perry and Huntingdon counties. More information regarding The
Juniata Valley Bank can be found online at www.jvbonline.com.
Before Judge Donlon,

January 25,1967

No. R67/13.

No. R67/14.

No. R67/15.

No. R67/16.

No. R67/17.

No. R67/18.

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/15674, etc. (New York).

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/17599, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/18673, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### International Packers, Limited *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/19589, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/19614, etc. (Norfolk).

#### International Packers, Limited *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/20904, etc. (Philadelphia).

*907No. R67/19.

No. R67/20.

No. R67/21.

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/21790, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisements R60/21843, etc. (Jacksonville).

#### International Packers, Limited *v.*United States,

reappraisements R61/1407, etc. (New Orleans).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved respectively in *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), as to merchandise appraised on the basis of United States value; *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 518, Reap. Dec. 10724), as to merchandise appraised on the basis of constructed value; and *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147), as to merchandise appraised on the basis of export value, the court found and held those respective values, as defined in section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper bases for determining value of the entered canned meat products listed on schedule “B” under the headings “Export Value,” “United States Value,” and “Constructed Value,” packed in the container sizes identified on such schedule, and exported from Argentina during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31, 1959, described on the invoices of the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and stated in the entries and recited in schedule “B” under the headings “Export Value,” “United States Value,” and “Constructed Value,” during those periods which correspond to the times of exportation of the schedule “B” canned meats described under the headings “Export Value,” “United States Value,” and “Constructed Value” and covered by the appeals for reappraisement, recited in schedule “A,” which with schedule “B,” was attached to and made a part of the decisions.
No. 57099.

protests 164456-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fiorelli Food Products et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of peppers, pickled with vinegar, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *E. J. Petrosemolo Co., Inc.*and *Barian Shipping Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 159, C. D. 1461), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,136
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             305
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   366
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    108,189
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,985
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,913
<LOANS>                                        183,677
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 311,801
<DEPOSITS>                                     219,255
<SHORT-TERM>                                    51,917
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,277
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,012
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 301,801
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,377
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,382
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    71
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,830
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,361
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,154
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,676
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      551
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (100)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,473
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,473
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,876
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.72
<LOANS-NON>                                        141
<LOANS-PAST>                                         3
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,452
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,805
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,343
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,742
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            601


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.
 ShareholdingJurisdiction
    
    at Year EndName of Subsidiary(1)
    
    of Incorporation
    
    Direct
    
    IndirectZellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH & Co. KG
    
    Germany
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100
    %Zellstoff Stendal GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    
    
    
    
    
    70.6
    %Zellstoff Celgar Limited
    
    Canada
    
    
    100
    %
    
    
    Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership
    
    Canada
    
    
    100
    %
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    All the subsidiaries are conducting business under their own names.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,288,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,321,295
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,421,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          857,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,627,262
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,421,295
<SALES>                                         10,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (356,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (356,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        



</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 99.8


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered AccountantsPricewaterhouseCoopers Place250 Howe Street, Suite 700Vancouver, British ColumbiaCanada V6C 3S7Telephone +1 604 806 7000Facsimile +1 604 806 7806
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We hereby consent to the inclusion in Baja Mining Corp.s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 of our audit report dated March 31, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2010 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Baja Mining Corp. as of December 31, 2010. (signed) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered AccountantsVancouver, British Columbia 
March 31, 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.


---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00330-CR

GERRICK OLIVER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-00795-CRF-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Gerrick Oliver’s notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time to 

file the notice of appeal were filed in this Court on October 10, 2022. The district clerk’s 

record, filed on October 19, 2022, reflects that judgments were signed on July 22, 2022. 

No motion for new trial was filed. Oliver’s appeal is, therefore, untimely, and we lack 

jurisdiction to consider his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a).

The appellate court may extend the time to file an appeal if, within fifteen days 

after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party: (a) files in the trial court the 
Oliver v. State Page 2

notice of appeal, and (b) files in the appellate court a motion for extension of time to file 

a notice of appeal. Id. 26.3. Oliver’s motion to extend the time for filing the notice of 

appeal was filed beyond that fifteen-day period. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and Oliver’s Motion 

for Extension of Time to File is denied.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Opinion delivered and filed October 26, 2022

Appeal dismissed; motion denied

Do not publish

[CR25]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 427 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 427

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Directing the Clerk of the House to correct the enrollment of H.R. 
                                 2415.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 427

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2415) entitled ``An Act to 
enhance security of United States missions and personnel overseas, to 
authorize appropriations for the Department of State for fiscal year 
2000, and for other purposes'', the Clerk of the House shall make the 
following corrections:
            (1) Amend section 1(a) of the bill to read as follows:
    ``(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the `The Gekas-
Grassley Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2000.' ''.
            (2) Strike ``Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2000'' each place it 
        appears throughout the bill and insert ``Gekas-Grassley 
        Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 447

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the States should adopt uniform

voting procedures to carry out the election of the President and Vice

President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 15, 2000

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the States should

adopt uniform voting procedures to carry out the election

of the President and Vice President.

Whereas despite Federal efforts to increase uniformity in voting procedures for elections for Federal office, there remains much variation in such procedures among the

States;

Whereas a major goal of the National Voter Registration Act

of 1993 (commonly known as the ‘‘Motor-Voter Act’’)

was the standardization of voter registration procedures

for elections for Federal office to prevent voter fraud and

provide an accurate list of eligible voters;

Whereas under the provisions of the Uniformed and Overseas

Citizens Absentee Voting Act, absent uniformed services
2

•HCON 447 IH

voters and overseas voters can vote by absentee ballot in

elections for Federal office and, if a State does not provide an official State absentee ballot in response to a

timely request, can write in the names of candidates on

a Federal write-in absentee ballot;

Whereas in North Dakota and in some counties in Wisconsin,

individuals may vote without registering;

Whereas individuals in Idaho, New Hampshire, Maine, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming may register to vote on

the day of the election;

Whereas the duration of the residency requirement for voter

registration varies from State to State from 1 to 30 days;

Whereas in 7 States disability or illness does not provide sufficient grounds for registering as an absentee voter, and

in 4 States disability or illness does not provide sufficient

grounds for voting as an absentee;

Whereas a few States allow any citizen who is out of the

United States or the State to register as an absentee

voter;

Whereas at least 7 different types of voting equipment are

used to carry out Presidential elections throughout the

United States, and the type of equipment used is determined on the county level; and

Whereas the opening time for polling places in Federal elections varies from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., and the closing

time for such polling places varies from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00

p.m.: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 States should adopt uniform procedures to carry out the
3

•HCON 447 IH

1 election of the President and Vice President, including

2 uniform procedures for voter registration, absentee voting,

3 early voting, and voting hours on the day of the election.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 439 Agreed to House (ATH)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 439

                Correcting the enrollment of H.R. 2614.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2000

                   Agreed to pursuant to H. Res. 663

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                Correcting the enrollment of H.R. 2614.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2614) to amend the Small 
Business Investment Act to make improvements to the certified 
development company program, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 1, insert before ``are hereby enacted into 
        law'' the following: ``, as modified in accordance with section 
        3,''.
            (2) In section 2, insert before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, modified in accordance with section 3''.
            (3) Add at the end the following new section:

SEC. 3. MODIFICATION TO TEXT OF BILL ENACTED BY REFERENCE.

    The modification referred to in sections 1 and 2 is to the text of 
the bill H.R. 5538, as referred to in section 1(1), and is as follows: 
the quoted matter in the amendment proposed to be made by section 2 of 
such bill is modified by striking ``June 30, 2000'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2000''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OFTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO

 18 U.S.C.§1350

 

I, Kathleen Mason, theChief Executive Officer of Tuesday Morning Corporation, hereby certify that:

 

1.      Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tuesday Morning Corporation for theperiod ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The information contained inthe above-mentioned report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Tuesday Morning Corporation.

 

 
| Date: January 30,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Kathleen Mason                      |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Kathleen Mason  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
March 2 4 , 2015

Mr. Robert Biggs

601 East Pinto Court

Gilbert, AZ 85296

Dear Mr. Biggs :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your February 17 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

0472 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any addi tional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George
Achniotis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Navios Maritime
Holdings Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: September 11, 2013



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ George Achniotis         
|George Achniotis             
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 58770.

protest 239493-K (New York).

#### Arco Crown Cork & Cap Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.