alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                ----------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) MAY 27, 1999 (MAY 27, 1999)
                                                 -------------------------------

                              OUTDOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

          DELAWARE                    1-3275                86-0736400
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction       (Commission            (IRS Employer
     of Incorporation)             File Number)        Identification No.)


2502 NORTH BLACK CANYON HIGHWAY, PHOENIX, ARIZONA                     85009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                         (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code      (602) 246-9569
                                                  ------------------------------

                                 NOT APPLICABLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former Name of Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
<PAGE>   2
ITEM 5.   OTHER EVENTS.

     On May 27, 1999, the Registrant announced that it had entered into a
merger agreement with Infinity Broadcasting Corporation under which the
Registrant's stockholders will receive 1.25 shares of Infinity stock for each
share of Outdoor Systems stock they own. The transaction is valued at
approximately $8.3 billion in stock and debt.

     In light of these developments, the Board of Directors of Outdoor Systems,
Inc. has postponed indefinitely its 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which
had been scheduled for 4 p.m. (PDT) on Thursday, May 27.

     The transaction is subject to certain conditions, including regulatory
approvals and approval by the Registrant's stockholders.


                                      -2-
<PAGE>   3
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                   OUTDOOR SYSTEMS, INC.


Date: May 27, 1999                 By: /s/ BILL M. BEVERAGE
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Bill M. Beverage
                                       Chief Financial Officer,
                                       Treasurer and Secretary


                                      -3-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,122,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               77,702,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,900,195
<INVENTORY>                                 81,786,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           172,587,119
<PP&E>                                      61,278,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             385,638,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      168,191,967
<BONDS>                                     16,114,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,412
<OTHER-SE>                                 198,627,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               385,638,642
<SALES>                                     89,601,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            89,601,608
<CGS>                                       65,830,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,830,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,245,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                674,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                   341,634
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            333,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   333,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Suodor Al-Khair Co

- )

SAKCO for General Trading ) ) Under Contract No. W91GY0-08-C-0025 )
APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037

Mr. Ahmed S. Najm

Owner Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Erica S. Beardsley, Esq.

Trial Attorney
OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK DISMISSING THE APPEALS FORFAILURE TO PROSECUTE These appeals arise from the contract referred to above. As more fully described in the Board's priorruling partially granting the government's motion to dismiss ASBCA No. 59036, and denying its motion to dismiss ASBCA No. 59037, appellant appeals from the contracting officer's denial ofits claim for $72,077.33, and assertion ofa claim against appellant for $65,763.13. See SuodorAl-Khair Co -SAKCO for General Trading, ASBCA Nos. 59036, 59037, 15-1 BCA**~** 35,964. Afterthat ruling was issued, the Board ordered the parties on 28 April 2015 to confer andjointlypropose a schedule of proceedings. The governmentprovided correspondence in response to that order on 27 May 2015. The Board ordered appellant to respond to that letterby 18 June 2015. Nothing was received. On 4 September 2015, the Board again ordered the parties to propose a schedule. On 7 October 2015, the government reported it had been unable to communicate with appellant and proposed its own schedule. On 10 November 2015, noting the government's statements, the Board ordered appellant to communicate whether it intended to continue pursuing these appeals. Nothing was received. On 2 February 2016, the Board issued an orderto appellant to show cause by 12 February 2016 why these appeals should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Nothing has been received.Accordingly, under BoardRule 17 the appeals are dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. SeeAlNawars Co., ASBCANo. 59044, 16-1 BCA

### if 36,234.
Dated: 21 March 2016

I concur 

# ///? 

# 4i::I'**a~~--** / MARKN.

# s PLER Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

# ~~(_~~ MARK A. MELNICK Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCANos. 59036, 59037, Appeals of SuodorAl-Khair Co

- SAKCO for General Trading, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
1 The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Un ited States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2679

___________ Lamont Gentry Falls, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Dwight L. Fondren, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 2011 Filed: March 8, 2011

___________ Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Lamont Gentry Falls appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged disciplinary proceedings that ultimately resulted in, among other things , a loss of good conduct time. Upon careful de novo review, see Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam), we agree w ith the district court that Falls was adequately afforded due process in the disciplinary proceedings, and we agree with the conclusion that the2We decline to consider Falls’s newly raised claim regarding evidence allegedly withheld from him. See Stone v. Harry , 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (claims not presented in district court may not be advanced for first time on appeal). -2- disciplinary decision was supported by the evidence. See, e.g. , Superintendent v. Hill , 472 U.S. 445, 455-56 (1985) (requirements of due process are satisfied if “some evidence” supports disciplinary decision to revoke good time credits). 2
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 428 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 428

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 13 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for corrections in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 5164) 
 amending title 49, United States Code, to require reports concerning 
defects in motor vehicles or tires or other motor vehicle equipment in 
               foreign countries, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill, H.R. 5164, entitled ``An Act to 
amend title 49, United States Code, to require reports concerning 
defects in motor vehicles or tires or other motor vehicle equipment in 
foreign coun-

tries, and for other purposes'', the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections in section 6:
            (1) insert before ``Section 30120(c)'' the following: ``(a) 
        Remedy Program.--''; and
            (2) insert at the end of section 6 the following:
    ``(b) Reimbursement Prior to Recall.--Section 30120(d) of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end thereof the 
following: ``A manufacturer's remedy program shall include a plan for 
reimbursing an owner or purchaser who incurred the cost of the remedy 
within a reasonable time in advance of the manufacturer's notification 
under subsection (b) or (c) of section 30118. The Secretary may 
prescribe regulations establishing what constitutes a reasonable time 
for purposes of the preceding sentence and other reasonable conditions 
for the reimbursement plan.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 58804.

protests 230631-K and 230630-K (New York).

#### Industrial Raw Materials Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protests were overruled.
Before the Third Division,

March 16, 1961

No. 65303.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/9869 and 60/9868 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106) and that the items marked “B” consist of earthenware ashtrays with metal or wire holders and that the issue is the same as that in *James Betesh Import Co.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 186, C.D. 1981), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
No. 66161.

#### W. Sarasin, Swiss Ribbons, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/25046, etc. (New York).

*346Opinion by

Ford, J.

In ¡accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon pile ribbons similar in use to pile ribbons in chief value of silk and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 57513.

Suit 4738.

#### R. P. Oldham Company *v.*United States.

Abstract 56507 affirmed June 3, 1953. C. A. D. 528.
Exhibit 32.1

Residential Capital, LLC

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Residential Capital, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Thomas F. Marano

Thomas F. Marano

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

August 25, 2009

/s/ James N. Young

James N. Young

Chief Financial Officer

August 25, 2009
No. 55041.

#### Alliance Rubber Co. *v.*United States,

protest 136648-K (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 66646.

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc., by Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., of L.A. *v.*United States,

protest 61/6341 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed as untimely.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 440

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Government of Mexico should

adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the Colorado

and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande Treaty Between the United

States and Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 31, 2000

Mr. BONILLA (for himself and Mr. ORTIZ) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Government

of Mexico should adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and

of the Rio Grande Treaty Between the United States

and Mexico.

Whereas the United States and Mexico signed a treaty on

water utilization on February 3, 1944, to divide the waters of the Rio Grande and Colorado River systems;

Whereas the treaty required Mexico to deliver a minimum of

350,000 acre feet of water per year on a 5-year average

from 6 Mexican tributaries;
2

•HCON 440 IH

Whereas the treaty required the United States to deliver a

minimum of 1,500,000 acre feet of water per year from

the Colorado River;

Whereas the United States has never failed to meet its obligations under the treaty;

Whereas during the period of 1992–1997, Mexico failed to

meet its obligations under the treaty by 1,024,000 acre

feet;

Whereas a recent study conducted by the Texas A&M University Agriculture Program has determined the economic

impact to south Texas from this water loss due to noncompliance with the treaty at $441,000,000 per year; and

Whereas the Government of Mexico has not presented any

plan to repay its entire water debt as required by the

treaty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the President of the United States should

4 promptly utilize the full powers of his office to bring

5 about compliance with the 1944 treaty on water uti6 lization in order that the full requirement of water

7 be available for United States use during the next

8 full crop season; and

9 (2) the United States Section of the Inter10 national Boundary and Water Commission should

11 work to bring about full compliance with the 1944

12 treaty on water utilization and not accept any water
3

•HCON 440 IH

1 debt or deficit repayment plan that does not provide

2 for the full repayment of water owed.

Æ
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00391

- CR

Michael Wade Parrett

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 355th District Court

o f Hood C ounty (CR12628 )

November 20, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordere d that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

52–325 2009

[ERRATA] 

MARKUP OF SEVERAL BILLS 

MEETING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE 

ADMINISTRATION 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, JUNE 10, 2009 

Printed for the use of the Committee on House Administration 

( 

Available on the Internet: 

http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/senate05sh.html 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with HEARING
ERRATA 

The first page of the meeting transcript of the June 10, 2009, 

meeting of the Committee on House Administration contained errors in listing of items considered for markup that day. The bill 

and resolution numbers should have been listed in the following 

order: MARKUP OF H.R. 2510, H.R. 1752, H. CON. RES. 135, H. 

CON. RES. 131, H.R. 1196, H.R. 1604, H.R. 512, H.R. 2393, H.R. 

2728. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with HEARING
No. 66645.

#### George Cohen Textile Fibres, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/7858 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk noils, not over 2 inches in length, and that said merchandise is silk waste and not silk, partially manufactured, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT C

                               BROKERS AND FINDERS

         In accordance  with the Letter of Agreement  that follows,  Genesis has
agreed to pay a finders fee of $20,000 to North Pacific Ventures, LLC, and North
Pacific  Ventures has agreed to accept $20,000 for the finders fee. Genesis will
make the $20,000  payment to North Pacific  Ventures LLC within five days of the
Closing Date upon delivery by North Pacific Ventures LLC of a full, complete and
unconditional release.
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, David E. Roberts, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Penn West Petroleum Ltd.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 8, 2016



/s/ David E. RobertsDavid E. RobertsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                            STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

         THIS STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered as of the 4th
day of September, 2003 by and between Highland Hospitality Corporation, a
Maryland corporation (the "REIT") and Bruce D. Wardinski (the "Investor").

         THE PARTIES ENTER THIS AGREEMENT on the basis of the following facts,
understandings and intentions:

         WHEREAS, the REIT proposes to undertake an underwritten initial public
offering (the "Offering") of shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per
share ("Shares"); and

         WHEREAS, the Investor desires to purchase Shares as described herein;
and

         WHEREAS, the parties have determined that, in connection with the
Offering and the purchase of Shares by the Investor, it is desirable to set
forth in this Agreement certain covenants and agreements among the parties.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

         1. Investor hereby agrees to purchase 300,000 Shares directly from the
REIT. The purchase price per share for the Shares shall be the initial public
Offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions.

         2. Investor understands and agrees that the purchase of the Shares is
being made pursuant to a private placement exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and may not be
sold, transferred or conveyed by the Investor except in compliance with
applicable securities laws.

         3. The purchase of the Shares by Investor shall be by means of a cash
payment (wire transfer or other means acceptable to the REIT) and shall close at
the time of closing of the Offering.

         4. Investor hereby agrees that the purchase of the Shares may be
described in the REIT's registration statement and prospectus.

         5. Investor hereby represents and warrants to the REIT that:

                  a. Investor is an "accredited investor" as that term is
defined in Rule 501 of the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Act; and

                  b. Investor has received all information Investor deems
relevant or necessary with respect to the purchase of the Shares.

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into effective as
of the 4th day of September, 2003.

                               HIGHLAND HOSPITALITY CORPORATION


                                  By:  /s/ James L. Francis
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:   James L. Francis
                                  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

                               By:  /s/ Bruce D. Wardinski
                                    --------------------------------------------
                               Name: Bruce D. Wardinski