# Official Journal C 65/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.065.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 65 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 566 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.065.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 65

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 566 March 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 065/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6803 — Avolon/Wells Fargo/ACP JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 065/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6803 — Avolon/Wells Fargo/ACP JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 065/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2013/C 065/03 | Special Report No 25/2012 Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers? | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2013/C 065/04 | Decision of the Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 establishing the Framework for capacity allocation on the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 | 4 |
| 2013/C 065/05 | Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  ) | 13 |
| 2013/C 065/06 | Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations | 14 |
| 2013/C 065/07 | Updated list of customs offices in which products listed in Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1635/2006 may be declared for free circulation in the European Community | 15 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 065/02

Euro exchange rates

2

Court of Auditors

2013/C 065/03

Special Report No 25/2012 Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers?

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2013/C 065/04

Decision of the Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 establishing the Framework for capacity allocation on the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2

4

2013/C 065/05

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  )

1

13

2013/C 065/06

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

14

2013/C 065/07

Updated list of customs offices in which products listed in Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1635/2006 may be declared for free circulation in the European Community

15

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6803 — Avolon/Wells Fargo/ACP JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 65/01

On 28 February 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6803. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6803. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 March 2013

2013/C 65/02

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3034 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4557 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85980 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3384 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2277 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4400 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,629 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,87 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7010 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1310 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3635 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3391 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2735 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3379 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1096 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5763 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6244 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 418,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8214 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1065 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5930 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 642,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0440 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,115 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,841 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5680 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6001 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,5110 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3034

JPY

Japanese yen

121,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4557

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85980

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3384

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2277

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4400

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,629

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,87

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7010

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1310

RON

Romanian leu

4,3635

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3391

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2735

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3379

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1096

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5763

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6244

KRW

South Korean won

1 418,70

ZAR

South African rand

11,8214

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1065

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5930

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 642,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0440

PHP

Philippine peso

53,115

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0300

THB

Thai baht

38,841

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5680

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6001

INR

Indian rupee

71,5110

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

Court of Auditors

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/3

---

Special Report No 25/2012 ‘Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers?’

2013/C 65/03

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 25/2012 ‘Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/4

---

Decision of the Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 establishing the Framework for capacity allocation on the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2

2013/C 65/04

THE MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT OF THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS,

IN PRESENCE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to:

| — | The Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (1) and in particular Articles 39, 43, 45, 46, 48, 56.1 and Annex VII of the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (1) and in particular Articles 39, 43, 45, 46, 48, 56.1 and Annex VII of the Directive;

| — | The Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (2); and in particular Articles 8, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19 and 20 of the Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (2); and in particular Articles 8, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19 and 20 of the Regulation;

Whereas:

| — | The Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2, as referred to in Article 8 of the Regulation (EU) No 913/2010, have been established and their mission statements have been adopted at the occasion of the Antwerp Conference, the 27th of June 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2, as referred to in Article 8 of the Regulation (EU) No 913/2010, have been established and their mission statements have been adopted at the occasion of the Antwerp Conference, the 27th of June 2011;

| — | The Chairpersons of the Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 have informed the European Commission of the establishment of their Boards by letters dated respectively the 29th of June 2011 and the 11th of July 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Chairpersons of the Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 have informed the European Commission of the establishment of their Boards by letters dated respectively the 29th of June 2011 and the 11th of July 2011;

| — | The European Commission has answered to these Chairpersons, by letters dated 19th of October 2011, welcoming the establishment of the Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2; |
| --- | --- |

—

The European Commission has answered to these Chairpersons, by letters dated 19th of October 2011, welcoming the establishment of the Executive Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2;

| — | The Executive Boards must define the framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity on the freight corridor in accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EU) No 913/2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Executive Boards must define the framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity on the freight corridor in accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EU) No 913/2010;

| — | Switzerland is negotiating the transposition of the Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 with the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

Switzerland is negotiating the transposition of the Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 with the European Commission;

| — | The Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 are interconnected in Rotterdam, Antwerp, Basle; the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 8 are interconnected in Rotterdam, Antwerp, Duisburg; the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 6 are interconnected in Milan; the Rail Freight Corridors No 2 and No 6 are interconnected in Lyon; and the Rail Freight Corridors No 2 and No 4 are interconnected in Metz; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 are interconnected in Rotterdam, Antwerp, Basle; the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 8 are interconnected in Rotterdam, Antwerp, Duisburg; the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 6 are interconnected in Milan; the Rail Freight Corridors No 2 and No 6 are interconnected in Lyon; and the Rail Freight Corridors No 2 and No 4 are interconnected in Metz;

| — | Common binding rules are needed at the corridors’ level allowing the Corridor One-stop-Shops (C-OSS) to allocate fairly including in the event of conflicting applications; |
| --- | --- |

—

Common binding rules are needed at the corridors’ level allowing the Corridor One-stop-Shops (C-OSS) to allocate fairly including in the event of conflicting applications;

| — | A harmonised framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity on all the Rail Freight Corridors is desirable; |
| --- | --- |

—

A harmonised framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity on all the Rail Freight Corridors is desirable;

| — | The Management Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 have agreed on this framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Management Boards of Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 have agreed on this framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity;

| — | The Infrastructure Managers/Allocation Bodies will refer to it in their respective national network statement in view of its implementation; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Infrastructure Managers/Allocation Bodies will refer to it in their respective national network statement in view of its implementation;

| — | The Regulatory Bodies expressed their position on this framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Regulatory Bodies expressed their position on this framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity;

| — | The Ministers signing this document will aim at applying this document and consider to extend its application to other corridors in which they are involved; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Ministers signing this document will aim at applying this document and consider to extend its application to other corridors in which they are involved;

| — | An English version of this framework is available, |
| --- | --- |

—

An English version of this framework is available,

DECIDE to adopt the framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity of the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2, in Annex;

DECIDE that this framework must be implemented;

EXPRESS the consent of their States to be bound by this decision;

ASK the European Commission to publish the present decision and the framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity of the Rail Freight Corridors No 1 and No 2 in Annex, in the Official Journal of the European Union,

CORRIDOR-FRAMEWORK

for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity on freight corridors according to Regulation (EU) No 913/2010

I.   PURPOSE, SCOPE AND CHARACTER OF THE FRAMEWORK

| 1. | Article 14.1 of Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 (‘the Regulation’) requires the Executive Board to establish a corridor framework for capacity allocation. The framework for capacity allocation on the corridor concerns the mandatory aspects of the Regulation regarding the capacity allocation.
  This framework for capacity allocation on the corridor (‘Corridor-Framework’) concerns only the allocation linked to the pre-arranged train paths and to the reserve capacity given to the Corridor One-Stop-Shop (‘C-OSS’) for freight trains, crossing at least one border on a corridor as foreseen by Article 14.4 of the Regulation, namely where the allocation of capacity by the C-OSS is mandatory, according to Article 13 of the Regulation.
  The Executive Board will evaluate the functioning of the Corridor Framework, taking into account the monitoring established in Annex 1. The regulatory bodies will inform the Executive Board of their own observations. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 14.1 of Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 (‘the Regulation’) requires the Executive Board to establish a corridor framework for capacity allocation. The framework for capacity allocation on the corridor concerns the mandatory aspects of the Regulation regarding the capacity allocation.

This framework for capacity allocation on the corridor (‘Corridor-Framework’) concerns only the allocation linked to the pre-arranged train paths and to the reserve capacity given to the Corridor One-Stop-Shop (‘C-OSS’) for freight trains, crossing at least one border on a corridor as foreseen by Article 14.4 of the Regulation, namely where the allocation of capacity by the C-OSS is mandatory, according to Article 13 of the Regulation.

The Executive Board will evaluate the functioning of the Corridor Framework, taking into account the monitoring established in Annex 1. The regulatory bodies will inform the Executive Board of their own observations.

| 2. | The framework shall apply to Infrastructure Managers and Allocation Bodies (IMs/ABs) in order to install clear and transparent principles for the allocation process of pre-arranged train paths and reserve capacity by the C-OSS. IMs and ABs will enforce the implementation of the framework by including the relevant provisions in their network statements.
  The scope of the application of the framework will be defined in the corridor implementation plan where routes and connecting lines will be defined. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The framework shall apply to Infrastructure Managers and Allocation Bodies (IMs/ABs) in order to install clear and transparent principles for the allocation process of pre-arranged train paths and reserve capacity by the C-OSS. IMs and ABs will enforce the implementation of the framework by including the relevant provisions in their network statements.

The scope of the application of the framework will be defined in the corridor implementation plan where routes and connecting lines will be defined.

II.   PRINCIPLES OF SUPPLY OF PRE-ARRANGED PATHS

The capacity provided by the national Infrastructure Managers and Allocation Bodies (‘IMs/Abs’) for the pre-arranged train paths and the reserve capacity to the C-OSS, is taken from the national capacity dedicated to freight traffic. The construction of pre-arranged paths and the definition of reserve capacity, is realised by the IMs/ABs in accordance with Article 14 of the Regulation, by taking into account i.a.:

| — | the Transport Market Study, analysing the demand for international freight traffic on the corridor and covering the different types of traffic, in particular passenger traffic, |
| --- | --- |

—

the Transport Market Study, analysing the demand for international freight traffic on the corridor and covering the different types of traffic, in particular passenger traffic,

| — | the request for infrastructure capacity relating to the past and present working timetables, |
| --- | --- |

—

the request for infrastructure capacity relating to the past and present working timetables,

| — | the national framework agreements. |
| --- | --- |

—

the national framework agreements.

Details of supply of the pre-arranged paths are explained in the Corridor Information Document.

These pre-arranged paths are handed over to the C-OSS for exclusive management at the latest X-11 and for reserve capacity at least 60 days before the train running (X-2).

The IMs/ABs will aim to include in the supply of pre-arranged train paths, the access and the paths connecting terminals where feasible.

The pre-arranged paths managed by the C-OSS for the allocation in the yearly timetable and the reserve capacity are dedicated to the corridor. Therefore it is essential that the displayed dedicated capacity is protected against subsequent adaptations by the IMs/ABs critical for the applicants.

The Management Board shall decide whether and if so to what extent the unused capacity shall be returned by the C-OSS to the relevant IMs/ABs at X-7,5, according to a principle published in the Corridor Information Document and taking into account the need for sufficient reserve capacity of good quality.

III.   PRINCIPLES OF ALLOCATION OF THE PRE-ARRANGED TRAIN PATHS AND RESERVE CAPACITY BY THE C-OSS

The decision on the allocation of pre-arranged train paths and reserve capacity on the freight corridor is taken by the C-OSS, in accordance with Article 13 of the Regulation.

Like the IMs/ABs, the C-OSS has to respect the rules of Directive 2012/34/EU, especially Article 29.

The activities within the timetabling processes concerning pre-arranged train paths and reserve capacity are described in Annex 2.

1.   General principles related to the establishment of the C-OSS

The C-OSS has to be established under and is governed by the principles of transparency, non-discrimination, independence, balance and fairness.

The Management Board is responsible for designating or for setting-up the C-OSS including its operating modalities. The implementation plan, which will be part of the Corridor Information Document to be published by the Management Board according to Article 18 of the Regulation, will describe the competences, the form of organisation, the access rights, the liability vis-à-vis applicants and the mode of functioning of the C-OSS and its conditions of use.

2.   Principles of transparency and non-discrimination

In addition to the Corridor Information Document, once adopted, the IMs/ABs will publish the functioning and set-up of the C-OSS in their network statements. They will also mention the Corridor Information Document in their own network statements.

In accordance with Articles 13 of the Regulation, any application of pre-arranged paths and reserve capacity for corridor infrastructure capacity, crossing at least one border on a corridor, from a railway undertaking or authorised applicant will be conducted (requests handling, coordinating with IMs/ABs, monitoring, deciding and answering) by the C-OSS. Each application should be registered by the C-OSS and be subject to an appropriate response.

After receipt of all path requests for pre-arranged paths at X-8 (regular deadline for submitting path requests for the annual timetable) the C-OSS will decide on the allocation of pre-arranged paths without delay until X-7,5 and mark the allocation in the path register accordingly.

According to Articles 13.3 and 13.4 of the Regulation, in the same way it is requested that the C-OSS inform the competent IMs/ABs on its received applications and the decisions taken on them without delay. It is also requested that for any application which cannot be met, the C-OSS shall forward the application for infrastructure capacity without any delay to the competent IMs/ABs, which shall take a decision on that application and communicate this decision to the C-OSS for further processing. This procedure allows a follow-up on applications for international rail freight paths on the corridor that the C-OSS could receive.

3.   Principles of fairness and independence

The C-OSS respects the duties of confidentiality regarding the applications received.

In the context of the corridor, and consequently from a view point of international cooperation, the experts of the C-OSS staff are, within their mandate, to work independently from their IMs’/ABs’ tasks and they are ensuring allocation decisions for pre-arranged paths and reserve capacity on a corridor level. However, the C-OSS experts may work with the IMs/ABs for the purpose of coordinating the allocation of corridor paths with the allocation of feeder/outflow national paths.

4.   Principles of cooperation and balance

The IMs/ABs will coordinate and pool their pre-arranged corridor train paths into the pre-arranged path catalogue of the C-OSS in order to take into account the needs of the market, expressed through i.a. the Transport Market Study. The Management Board will inform the Executive Board on an annual basis on the quantitative and qualitative development of corridor train paths, according to Article 19.2 of the Regulation (see Annex 1 for a minimum set of indicators).

5.   Priorities to be applied by the C-OSS in case of conflicting applications

After receipt of all requests for pre-arranged train paths at X-8, the C-OSS will decide on the allocation of the pre-arranged paths.

In the event of conflicting applications, the C-OSS will apply the common priority rule for coordination which focuses on rewarding applicants with higher commercial value from IMs/ABs point of view and to maximise the use of capacity (longer pre-arranged path sections and more often). The formula is described in Annex 3.

Changes to this Annex can be done under the condition of a common agreement of both Executive and Management Boards.

This priority rule for coordination concerns only the pre-arranged train paths of the corridor and are applied only between X-8 and X-7,5 in case of conflicting applications.

Once the allocation decision is made following requests until X-8, the C-OSS will propose alternative pre-arranged train paths to the dissatisfied applicants. If these alternative solutions are not sufficiently adequate for the applicant, the C-OSS will forward the requests to the competent IMs/ABs according to Article 13.4 of the Regulation. Those path requests should be considered by IMs/ABs as having been submitted before the X-8 deadline.

Regarding the requests placed after X-8, the priority rule for coordination ‘first in, first served’ will be applied.

These rules will be inserted in the national network statements of each member of the Management Board of the corridor, describing the corridor aspects, and will afterwards be published in the Corridor Information Document.

IV.   REGULATORY CONTROL

The impact of the framework on capacity allocation on the annual allocation is, in the case of complaints, subject to (ex post) control by the regulatory bodies. Regulatory bodies may also start own-initiative investigations.

According to Article 20 of the Regulation, the regulatory bodies of each corridor shall collaborate. Ministers invite the Regulatory Bodies to describe their way of cooperation on regulatory control of C-OSS, and in particular by reaching a cooperation agreement defining how complaints regarding the allocation process of the C-OSS shall be filed and how a decision following a complaint shall be taken. This agreement should be published.

According to national provisions in some countries the regulatory bodies have to be involved in the allocation process (e.g. if a request cannot be met). In this case the regulatory body will be competent to monitor the IMs/ABs on its own territory according to Article 56.1 of the Directive 2012/34/EU.

V.   AUTHORISED APPLICANTS

According to Article 15 of the Regulation an authorised applicant may directly apply to the C-OSS for the allocation of pre-arranged train paths/reserve capacity. If the pre-arranged train path/reserve capacity was allocated by the C-OSS accordingly, the authorised applicant should appoint to the C-OSS within the time, as decided by the Management Board, the designated railway undertaking(s) which will use the train path/reserve capacity on behalf of the authorised applicant. The designated railway undertaking has therefore to conclude the necessary individual contracts with the IMs or ABs concerned relying on the respective national network access conditions.

The Corridor Information Document will describe the rights and obligations of applicants vis-à-vis C-OSS, in particular where no Railway Undertaking has been assigned yet. Network Statements should contain reservation fees in order to provide an incentive for efficient use of the allocated train path.

IMPLEMENTATION

This Corridor Framework shall come into force with the signing of the present framework. A first evaluation of the Corridor framework by the Executive Boards will take place two months after receiving the monitoring report for the year 2014 foreseen by Article 19.2. This version of this framework has to be published in the Corridor Information Document.

ANNEXES

| 1. | Monitoring of the allocation process. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Monitoring of the allocation process.

| 2. | Activities within the timetabling processes concerning pre-arranged train paths and reserve capacity. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Activities within the timetabling processes concerning pre-arranged train paths and reserve capacity.

| 3. | Description of the priority rule for coordination at X-8 in the event of conflicting requests for pre-arranged paths. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Description of the priority rule for coordination at X-8 in the event of conflicting requests for pre-arranged paths.

Signed at Brussels, on 20 December 2012 established in a single original in the French, German, Italian and Dutch languages, each text being equally authentic.

Melchior WATHELET

Staatssecretaris voor Mobiliteit

Secrétaire d’Etat à la mobilité

Staatssekretär für Mobilität

Voor het Federal Overheid Dienst Mobiliteit and Vervoer van Belgïe

Pour le service publique fédéral mobilité et transports de Belgique

Für den Föderaler Öffentlicher Dienst Mobilität und Transportwesen

Peter RAMSAUER

Bundesminister für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung von Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Für das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung

Frédéric CUVILLIER

Ministre délégué auprès de la ministre de l'écologie, du développement durable et de l'énergie, en charge des transports, de la mer et de la pêche de la République française

Pour le ministre de l'écologie, du développement durable et de l'énergie

Mario CIACCIA

Vice Ministro delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti de la Repubblica italiana

Per il Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti

Claude WISELER

Ministre du développement durable et des infrastructures du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Pour le Département des Transports du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Wilma J. MANSVELD

De Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden

Voor het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu

In Anwesenheit von Siim KALLAS, Vizepräsident der Europäischen Kommission

En présence de M. Siim KALLAS, vice-président de la Commission européenne

In presenza di Siim KALLAS, vicepresidente della Commissione europea

In aanwezigheid van Siim KALLAS, vicevoorzitter van de Europese Commissie

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 32.

1

(2)  OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 22.

2

---

ANNEX 1

Monitoring of the allocation process

On an annual basis the process of capacity allocation will be evaluated on the corridor with a view to a continuous improvement of the process. The evaluation will be done after the allocation of the annual timetable, i.e. in period mid-August-October each year.

The evaluation will be done by the Management Board, and the Railway Undertaking Advisory Group and Terminal Advisory Group will be consulted.

A draft evaluation report with recommendations will be discussed in the Executive Board in the 4th quarter of each year.

The results of the monitoring will be published by the Management Board, according to Article 19 of the Regulation.

The first evaluation report will be done for the year 2014.

Indicators to be monitored on a bi-annual basis (period 1: mid-December till mid-June, period 2: mid-June to mid-December (change of timetable)):

| — | pre-arranged train path:






  — | number of offered pre-arranged train paths X-11 per section, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

pre-arranged train path:

—

number of offered pre-arranged train paths X-11 per section,

| — | the number of requests period X-11 till X-8 and X-8 (– 1 day) till X-2 (without feeder/outflow sections), |
| --- | --- |

—

the number of requests period X-11 till X-8 and X-8 (– 1 day) till X-2 (without feeder/outflow sections),

| — | number of train paths which are allocated by C-OSS, |
| --- | --- |

—

number of train paths which are allocated by C-OSS,

| — | number of train paths which reached active timetable phase, |
| --- | --- |

—

number of train paths which reached active timetable phase,

| — | number of conflicting applications (double booking at X-8), |
| --- | --- |

—

number of conflicting applications (double booking at X-8),

| — | indicator for reserve capacity to be allocated by C-OSS at X-2:






  — | train paths offered, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

indicator for reserve capacity to be allocated by C-OSS at X-2:

—

train paths offered,

| — | train paths allocated, |
| --- | --- |

—

train paths allocated,

| — | train paths reaching the status of active timetable. |
| --- | --- |

—

train paths reaching the status of active timetable.

---

ANNEX 2

Activities within the timetabling processes concerning prearranged train paths and reserve capacity

| Date/period | Activity |
| --- | --- |
| X-11 | Publication of pre-arranged paths provided by the IMs/ABs |
| X-8 | Deadline for submitting path requests |
| X-7,5 | Forwarding requests with ‘flexible approaches’ (e.g. first/last mile) or ‘special treatments’ to IMs/ABs |
| X-7,5 | Possible returning of some remaining (unused) pre-arranged paths to the competent IMs/ABs — based on the decision of the Corridor MB — for use during the elaboration of the annual timetable by the IMs/ABs |
| X-5,5 | Finalisation of path construction for requested ‘flexible approaches’ by the IMs/ABs and delivering of the results to Corridor OSS for information and development of the draft timetable |
| X-5 | Publication of the draft timetable for pre-arranged paths — including sections provided by the IMs/ABs for requested ‘flexible approaches’ by the C-OSS |
| X-5 — X-4 | Observations from applicants |
| X-4 — X-3,5 | Post-processing and final allocation |
| X-4 — X-2 | Planning (production) reserve capacity for ad-hoc traffic |
| X-2 | Publication reserve capacity for ad-hoc traffic |

Date/period

Activity

X-11

Publication of pre-arranged paths provided by the IMs/ABs

X-8

Deadline for submitting path requests

X-7,5

Forwarding requests with ‘flexible approaches’ (e.g. first/last mile) or ‘special treatments’ to IMs/ABs

X-7,5

Possible returning of some remaining (unused) pre-arranged paths to the competent IMs/ABs — based on the decision of the Corridor MB — for use during the elaboration of the annual timetable by the IMs/ABs

X-5,5

Finalisation of path construction for requested ‘flexible approaches’ by the IMs/ABs and delivering of the results to Corridor OSS for information and development of the draft timetable

X-5

Publication of the draft timetable for pre-arranged paths — including sections provided by the IMs/ABs for requested ‘flexible approaches’ by the C-OSS

X-5 — X-4

Observations from applicants

X-4 — X-3,5

Post-processing and final allocation

X-4 — X-2

Planning (production) reserve capacity for ad-hoc traffic

X-2

Publication reserve capacity for ad-hoc traffic

---

ANNEX 3

Description of the priority rule for coordination at X-8 in the event of conflicting requests for pre-arranged paths

| LPAP | = | total requested length of pre-arranged path |
| --- | --- | --- |
| LTP | = | total requested length of complete path |
| YRD | = | number of requested running days for the timetable period |
| K | = | the rate for priority |

LPAP

=

total requested length of pre-arranged path

LTP

=

total requested length of complete path

YRD

=

number of requested running days for the timetable period

K

=

the rate for priority

All lengths are counted in kilometres.

The priority is calculated according to this formula:

Formula

This formula can be used so that in a first step the priority value (K) is calculated using only total requested length of pre-arranged path (LPAP) multiplied by the number of requested running days (YRD).

If the requests cannot be separated in this way, the total requested length of complete path (LTP) will also be added in the calculation in order to separate the requests.

---

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/13

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 65/05

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Glasgow to Campbeltown
  Glasgow to Tiree
  Glasgow to Barra |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 21 December 1996 |
| Date of entry into force of modifications | 1 April 2013 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  Transport Scotland |
| Area 2G (N) |
| Victoria Quay |
| Edinburgh |
| EH6 6QQ |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| Tel. +44 1312440854 |
| Fax +44 1312440463 |

Member State

United Kingdom

Route concerned

Glasgow to Campbeltown

Glasgow to Tiree

Glasgow to Barra

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

21 December 1996

Date of entry into force of modifications

1 April 2013

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

Transport Scotland

Area 2G (N)

Victoria Quay

Edinburgh

EH6 6QQ

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel. +44 1312440854

Fax +44 1312440463

Contact: Michael Bratcher, Policy Officer, Aviation Team

E-mail: Michael.Bratcher@transportscotland.gsi.gov.uk

---

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/14

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

2013/C 65/06

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Glasgow–Campbeltown
  Glasgow–Tiree
  Glasgow–Barra |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2015 |
| Deadline for submission of applications and tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Transport Scotland |
| Area 2G (N) |
| Victoria Quay |
| Edinburgh |
| EH6 6QQ |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| Tel. +44 1312440854 |
| Fax +44 1312440463 |

Member State

United Kingdom

Concerned routes

Glasgow–Campbeltown

Glasgow–Tiree

Glasgow–Barra

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2015

Deadline for submission of applications and tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Transport Scotland

Area 2G (N)

Victoria Quay

Edinburgh

EH6 6QQ

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel. +44 1312440854

Fax +44 1312440463

Contact: Michael Bratcher, Policy Officer, Aviation Team

E-mail: Michael.Bratcher@transportscotland.gsi.gov.uk

---

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/15

---

Updated list of customs offices (1) in which products listed in Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1635/2006 (2) may be declared for free circulation in the European Community

2013/C 65/07

| Member State | Customs offices |
| --- | --- |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË | Anvers DE — voie maritime
  Bierset — (Grâce-Hollogne) DE — voies aérienne et/ou terrestre
  Bruxelles DE — voie aérienne
  Zaventem D — voie aérienne |
| БЪЛГАРИЯ | Varna and Bourgas ports
  Sofia, Varna and Bourgas airports |
| ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA | All customs offices |
| DANMARK | Every port and airport in Denmark |
| DEUTSCHLAND | Baden-Württemberg | HZA Lörrach — ZA Weil-am-Rhein-Autobahn
  HZA Stuttgart — ZA Flughafen
  HZA Ulm — ZA Aalen |
| Bayern | HZA München — ZA Flughafen
  HZA Regensburg — ZA Furth-im-Wald-Schafberg
  HZA Schweinfurt — ZA Bayreuth
  HZA Nürnberg — ZA Erlangen-Tennenlohe |
| Berlin | HZA Berlin — ZA Marzahn
  HZA Potsdam — ZA Berlin-Flughafen-Tegel |
| Brandenburg | Bereich HZA Frankfurt (Oder)
  HZA Frankfurt (Oder) — ZA Frankfurt (Oder) Autobahn
  HZA Frankfurt (Oder) — ZA Forst-Autobahn
  Bereich HZA Potsdam
  HZA Potsdam — ZA Berlin-Flughafen Schönefeld |
| Bremen | HZA Bremen — ZA Neustädter Hafen
  HZA Bremerhaven — ZA Bremerhaven |
| Hamburg | HZA Hamburg-Stadt — ZA Oberelbe
  HZA Hamburg-Hafen — ZA Waltershof
  HZA Itzehoe — Hamburg-Flughafen |
| Hessen | HZA Frankfurt-am-Main-Flughafen |
| Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | HZA Stralsund — ZA Rostock-Grenzkontrollstelle Rostock |
| Niedersachsen | HZA Hannover — ZA Hannover-Nord
  HZA Braunschweig — ZA Braunschweig-Broitzem |
| Nordrhein-Westfalen | HZA Dortmund — ZA Ost
  HZA Düsseldorf — ZA Flughafen |
| Rheinland-Pfalz | HZA Koblenz — ZA Hahn-Flughafen |
| Schleswig-Holstein | HZA Kiel — ZA Lübeck Abfertigungsstelle Hafen |
| EESTI | Narva, Koidula, Luhamaa Frontier Posts, Tallinn Airport, Tallinn, Paljassaare and Muuga Ports |
| ΕΛΛΑΔΑ | Αθηνών, Πειραιά, Κρατικού Αερολιμένα Αθηνών, Θεσσαλονίκης, Αερολιμένα Μίκρας, Βόλου, Πατρών, Ηρακλείου, Αερολιμένα Ηρακλείου Κρήτης, Καβάλας, Ιωαννίνων, Ναυπλίου |
| ESPAÑA | Barcelona (Aeropuerto), Barcelona (Puerto), Irún (Carretera), La Junquera (Carretera), Madrid (Aeropuerto) |
| FRANCE | All customs offices |
| IRELAND | All customs offices |
| ITALIA | Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Trieste
  Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Torino — Caselle
  Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Roma — Fiumicino
  Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Venezia
  Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Genova
  Ufficio di Sanità marittima di Livorno
  Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Ancona
  Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Brindisi
  Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Varese — Malpensa
  Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Bologna — Panicale
  Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Bari
  Posto d'Ispezione frontaliera di Chiasso |
| ΚΥΠΡΟΣ | All customs offices |
| LATVIJA | Roads: Grebņeva, Pāternieki, Terehova; Railways: Daugavpils, Rēzekne-2; Seaports: Liepāja, Rīga, Ventspils; Airport: Rīga; Post: Rīga International branch of the Latvian Post Office |
| LIETUVA | All customs offices |
| LUXEMBOURG | Bureau des douanes et accises Centre douanier — Luxembourg
  Bureau des douanes et accises Luxembourg-aéroport — Niederanven |
| MAGYARORSZÁG | All customs offices |
| MALTA | The Air Freight Section at Malta International Airport, Luqa
  The Sea Freight Entry Processing Unit at Customs House, Valletta
  The Parcel Post Office at Customs Office, Qormi |
| NEDERLAND | All customs offices |
| ÖSTERREICH | Nickelsdorf
  Heiligenkreuz
  Spielfeld
  Tissis
  Wien Flughafen Schwechat |
| POLSKA | All customs offices |
| PORTUGAL | Aeroportos de Lisboa, Porto e Faro
  Portos de Lisboa e Leixões |
| ROMÂNIA | All customs offices |
| SLOVENIJA | Obrežje (road border crossing), Koper (port border crossing), Dobova (railway border crossing), Gruškovje (road border crossing), Jelšane (road border crossing), Brnik (air border crossing), Ljubljana (road and railway) |
| SLOVENSKO | All customs offices |
| SUOMI — FINLAND | Helsinki, Vaalimaa, Niirala, Vartius, Raja-Jooseppi, Utsjoki, Kilpisjärvi, Helsinki-Vantaan lentoasema |
| SVERIGE | Arlanda, Göteborg, Landvetter, Helsingborg, Karlskrona, Stockholm, Ystad, Karlshamn |
| UNITED KINGDOM | Belfast International Airport, Port of Belfast, Port of Dover, Port of Falmouth, Port of Felixstowe, Gatwick Airport, Glasgow Prestwick Airport, Manchester Airport, Port of Hull and Goole, Port of London, Port of Southampton |

Member State

Customs offices

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Anvers DE — voie maritime

Bierset — (Grâce-Hollogne) DE — voies aérienne et/ou terrestre

Bruxelles DE — voie aérienne

Zaventem D — voie aérienne

БЪЛГАРИЯ

Varna and Bourgas ports

Sofia, Varna and Bourgas airports

ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA

All customs offices

DANMARK

Every port and airport in Denmark

DEUTSCHLAND

Baden-Württemberg

HZA Lörrach — ZA Weil-am-Rhein-Autobahn

HZA Stuttgart — ZA Flughafen

HZA Ulm — ZA Aalen

Bayern

HZA München — ZA Flughafen

HZA Regensburg — ZA Furth-im-Wald-Schafberg

HZA Schweinfurt — ZA Bayreuth

HZA Nürnberg — ZA Erlangen-Tennenlohe

Berlin

HZA Berlin — ZA Marzahn

HZA Potsdam — ZA Berlin-Flughafen-Tegel

Brandenburg

Bereich HZA Frankfurt (Oder)

HZA Frankfurt (Oder) — ZA Frankfurt (Oder) Autobahn

HZA Frankfurt (Oder) — ZA Forst-Autobahn

Bereich HZA Potsdam

HZA Potsdam — ZA Berlin-Flughafen Schönefeld

Bremen

HZA Bremen — ZA Neustädter Hafen

HZA Bremerhaven — ZA Bremerhaven

Hamburg

HZA Hamburg-Stadt — ZA Oberelbe

HZA Hamburg-Hafen — ZA Waltershof

HZA Itzehoe — Hamburg-Flughafen

Hessen

HZA Frankfurt-am-Main-Flughafen

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

HZA Stralsund — ZA Rostock-Grenzkontrollstelle Rostock

Niedersachsen

HZA Hannover — ZA Hannover-Nord

HZA Braunschweig — ZA Braunschweig-Broitzem

Nordrhein-Westfalen

HZA Dortmund — ZA Ost

HZA Düsseldorf — ZA Flughafen

Rheinland-Pfalz

HZA Koblenz — ZA Hahn-Flughafen

Schleswig-Holstein

HZA Kiel — ZA Lübeck Abfertigungsstelle Hafen

EESTI

Narva, Koidula, Luhamaa Frontier Posts, Tallinn Airport, Tallinn, Paljassaare and Muuga Ports

ΕΛΛΑΔΑ

Αθηνών, Πειραιά, Κρατικού Αερολιμένα Αθηνών, Θεσσαλονίκης, Αερολιμένα Μίκρας, Βόλου, Πατρών, Ηρακλείου, Αερολιμένα Ηρακλείου Κρήτης, Καβάλας, Ιωαννίνων, Ναυπλίου

ESPAÑA

Barcelona (Aeropuerto), Barcelona (Puerto), Irún (Carretera), La Junquera (Carretera), Madrid (Aeropuerto)

FRANCE

All customs offices

IRELAND

All customs offices

ITALIA

Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Trieste

Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Torino — Caselle

Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Roma — Fiumicino

Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Venezia

Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Genova

Ufficio di Sanità marittima di Livorno

Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Ancona

Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Brindisi

Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Varese — Malpensa

Ufficio di Sanità aerea di Bologna — Panicale

Ufficio di Sanità marittima ed aerea di Bari

Posto d'Ispezione frontaliera di Chiasso

ΚΥΠΡΟΣ

All customs offices

LATVIJA

Roads: Grebņeva, Pāternieki, Terehova; Railways: Daugavpils, Rēzekne-2; Seaports: Liepāja, Rīga, Ventspils; Airport: Rīga; Post: Rīga International branch of the Latvian Post Office

LIETUVA

All customs offices

LUXEMBOURG

Bureau des douanes et accises Centre douanier — Luxembourg

Bureau des douanes et accises Luxembourg-aéroport — Niederanven

MAGYARORSZÁG

All customs offices

MALTA

The Air Freight Section at Malta International Airport, Luqa

The Sea Freight Entry Processing Unit at Customs House, Valletta

The Parcel Post Office at Customs Office, Qormi

NEDERLAND

All customs offices

ÖSTERREICH

Nickelsdorf

Heiligenkreuz

Spielfeld

Tissis

Wien Flughafen Schwechat

POLSKA

All customs offices

PORTUGAL

Aeroportos de Lisboa, Porto e Faro

Portos de Lisboa e Leixões

ROMÂNIA

All customs offices

SLOVENIJA

Obrežje (road border crossing), Koper (port border crossing), Dobova (railway border crossing), Gruškovje (road border crossing), Jelšane (road border crossing), Brnik (air border crossing), Ljubljana (road and railway)

SLOVENSKO

All customs offices

SUOMI — FINLAND

Helsinki, Vaalimaa, Niirala, Vartius, Raja-Jooseppi, Utsjoki, Kilpisjärvi, Helsinki-Vantaan lentoasema

SVERIGE

Arlanda, Göteborg, Landvetter, Helsingborg, Karlskrona, Stockholm, Ystad, Karlshamn

UNITED KINGDOM

Belfast International Airport, Port of Belfast, Port of Dover, Port of Falmouth, Port of Felixstowe, Gatwick Airport, Glasgow Prestwick Airport, Manchester Airport, Port of Hull and Goole, Port of London, Port of Southampton

---

(1)  The updates are in italics.

(2)  OJ L 306, 7.11.2006, p. 3.

---