### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2 

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

40428 Cabras Power Plant 1Control Device ConfiguratonEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 40428 Cabras Power Plant 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Time Test End Date Methane Emission Test ResultsTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Me asurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Fuel #4 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 40428 Cabras Power Plant 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test End Time Formaldehyde Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission RateFuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow

Rate (dscfm)Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Fuel #2 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 40428 Cabras Power Plant 1

M30B-3A/B 1/20/2011 8:30 M30B-4A/B 1/21/2011 9:16 M30B-5A/B 1/21/2011 13:11

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Me asured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

1/20/2011 11:00 0.0287 Dry 1/21/2011 12:16 0.0297 Dry 1/21/2011 15:11 0.0233 Dry

Test End Time Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results
Test End DatePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B DLL Standard deviation of 8 replicates times student's T value. 9.77E-08 389 U.S. EPA Method 30B DLL Standard deviation of 8 replicates times student's T value. 1.07E-07 385 U.S. EPA Method 30B DLL Standard deviation of 8 replicates times student's T value. 4.54E-08 390 Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate

509 12.4 11.8 6.3 53.21319444 441 12.1 11.7 6.2 40.77986111 441 12.1 11.7 6.2 40.77986111 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C)

gallon/m inute

Other No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C)

gallon/m inute

Other No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C)

gallon/m inute

Other Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Ma ss (ng) Section 2

Ma ss (ng) Total

Ma ss (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng)
85093 18 0.26 18.26 0 18.26 85105 22 0.26 22.26 0 22.26 85081 10 0.26 10.26 0 10.26 Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

0.1764 1.1 1.4 0.1035 70153 0.1629 2.9 1.2 0.1367 70173 0.1701 1.7 2.6 0.0603 70183 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤ 20% of field recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

ma ss for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1

Ma ss Section 2

Ma ss Total

Ma ss Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit
43 0.26 43.26 20 23.26 0.1745 1.1 39 0.26 39.26 20 19.26 0.1583 2.9 28 0.26 28.26 20 8.26 0.1673 1.7 ≤ 20% of field recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Ab s. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

0.60 0.1333 0.0298 12.6 144.44 0.67 0.1217 0.0150 5.80 111.35 0.93 0.0494 0.0109 9.98 108.6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Me asured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)

≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or
≤ 20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

126.0 88.1 90.8 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

101.6EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 40428 Cabras Power Plant 1

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as

needed) Run Number Test Start DateMe asured Value (μg)

Test Start Time Test End Date Test End TimeFootnotes:

* Front half fraction contains filter, cyclone, and cartridge ** Back half fraction contains condensate, solvent, impingers

Basis Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL)Front Half Mass (ng) Back Half Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Test Method Commentslb/mmBtu ug/dscm @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr)Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Flue Gas Temperature

(F) Fuel #1Me asurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #2Me asurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #3Me asurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #4Me asurement Method Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name 40428 Cabras Power Plant

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as

needed) Run NumberBoiler ID 1

Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateFootnotes: * Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Me asured Value (μg) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Time* Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test ResultsFront Half mass* (ng) Back Half mass* (ng) Condensate Mass*** (ng) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test ResultsTotal Composite (ng) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu Calculated Emission Rateμg/dscm @ 7% O2 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr)Flue Gas O 2(%)

Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate

Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement Method Fuel #1Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #2Me asurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Fuel #3Units of Measure Me asurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement Method Fuel #4Other Supporting

InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

40428 Cabras Power Plant 1

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting Information