alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 281

To authorize testimony and representation of employees of the Senate in

United States v. Alphonso Michael Espy.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and representation of employees of

the Senate in United States v. Alphonso Michael Espy.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Alphonso Michael

Espy, Criminal Case No. 97–0335, pending in the United

States District Court for the District of Columbia, a trial

subpoena has been served upon Galen Fountain and Jo

Nobles, employees of the Senate, and Leslie Chalmers

Tagg, formerly an employee of the Senate;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their

official responsibilities;
2

SRES 281 ATS

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Galen Fountain, Jo Nobles, Leslie

2 Chalmers Tagg, and any other employee from whom testi3 mony may be required, are authorized to testify in the case

4 of United States v. Alphonso Michael Espy, except con5 cerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.

6 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

7 to represent Galen Fountain, Jo Nobles, Leslie Chalmers

8 Tagg, and any other employee of the Senate, in connection

9 with testimony in United States v. Alphonso Michael

10 Espy.

Æ
No. 51813.

#### Julius Kayser Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 891051-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
LLP


**Certified Public Accountants**




**REPORT
        OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
  Board
        of
        Directors
 Midwest
        Loan Services, Inc.
  We
        have
        examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report titled *Report
        of Management,* that
        Midwest Loan Services, Inc. complied with the servicing standards
        identified in exhibit A to the *Report
        of Management* as
        set
        forth in the Mortgage
        Bankers Association of America's *Uniform
        Single Attestation Program for* *Mortgage
        Bankers* (USAP)
        during the year ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible
        for the Company's compliance with those specified minimum servicing standards.
        Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about
        the
        Company's compliance based on our examination.
  Our
        examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American
        Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
        on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the specified
        minimum servicing standards
        and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
        We believe that our examination does not provide a legal determination on
        the
        Company's compliance with specified minimum servicing standards.
  In
        our
        opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned
        specified minimum standards during the year ended December 31, 2005 is
        fairly
        stated, in all material respects.
  /s/
        UHY
        LLP
  Southfield,
        Michigan
 January
        20, 2006
    An
        Independent Member of Urbach Hacker Young International Limited
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Plant Sciences 
-  Sustainable Perennial Crops 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**Biological Control of the Cocoa Pod Borer
**Location: Sustainable Perennial Crops**
												Project Number: 1275-22000-242-06Project Type:																				Nonfunded Cooperative Agreement

Start Date: Sep 15, 2005End Date: Oct 30, 2009

**Objective:**The objective of this cooperative research project is to gain a better understanding of the basic biology of the cocoa pod borer with the final objective of developing an effective integrated pest management program.  The research will focus on phylogenetics, pheromone research, and artificial rearing.
**Approach:**Expertise is available at USDA on insect biocontrol, insect pathology, insect systematics, chemical ecology (including pheromones), and development of artificial diets.  All these areas are important in the development of a comprehensive integrated pest management program against the cocoa pod borer.  Scientists at USDA will conduct research to (1) determine whether cryptic cocoa pod borer species occur throughout South East Asia; (2) elucidate the pheromone components in the cocoa pod borer; and (3) assist in the development of an artificial rearing medium for the insect.  Results from this research project will be eventually tied to the current initiatives in breeding, integrated pest management, and farmer training in South East Asia.
    Project TeamVega, Fernando  
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 
Related National Programs Crop Protection & Quarantine(304)  							Last Modified: 10/14/2009 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
No. 68556.

protest 63/6372 (New York).

#### Jednak Floral Co. and J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as special air-circulating fans, type PVK, 110 volts, and special air-conditioning fans, type PVK, 220 volts, consists of articles that are more than fans and that they are actually combination fans and heaters used for commercial purposes in hothouses to heat and circulate the air, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POWERTEL, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         375,463
<SECURITIES>                                    91,530
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               446,110
<PP&E>                                         432,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (35,647)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,338,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,778
<BONDS>                                        774,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           270
<OTHER-SE>                                     389,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,338,988
<SALES>                                         11,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,205
<CGS>                                           26,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (17,177)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (63,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (63,325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (63,325)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



VOCUS, INC.
2005 STOCK AWARD PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
  I. NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT
 Name:
    
    (Recipient)Address:
  Date of Grant:Vesting Commencement Date:Total Number of Shares Granted:Type of Grant:
    
    Restricted Stock AwardVesting Schedule: This Grant shall be vested according to the following vesting schedule:
 % of the shares subject to the Grant shall vest
[on each of the first, second, third and fourth
anniversaries] of the Vesting Commencement Date,
subject to Recipients Continuous Service on such
dates
 II. AGREEMENT
 Award of Restricted Stock
 Vesting of Restricted Stock
   - 1 -




---



##### 



Delivery of Restricted Stock
     - 2 -




---



##### 



Termination of Continuous Service
 Rights with Respect to Restricted Stock
   Transferability
 Tax Matters; Section 83(b) Election
  - 3 -




---



##### 



Amendment or Modification
 Complete Agreement
 Miscellaneous
 Entire Agreement; Governing Law
 No Guarantee of Continued Service Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the
vesting of shares pursuant to the vesting schedule hereof is earned only by continuing as an
Employee, Consultant or Director (not through the act of being hired, being granted this Restricted
Stock or acquiring shares hereunder). Recipient further acknowledges and agrees that this
Agreement, the transactions contemplated hereunder and the vesting schedule set forth herein do not
constitute an express or implied promise of continued engagement as an Employee, Consultant or
Director for the vesting period, for any period, or at all, and shall not interfere in any way with Recipients right or the
companys right to terminate Recipients relationship as an Employee, Consultant or Director, as
applicable, at any time, with or without cause.
 - 4 -




---



##### 



No Trust or Fund Created
 Interpretation
 Notices
 Recipient
    
    Vocus, Inc.Signature
    
    SignaturePrinted Name
    
    Stephen A. Vintz, CFOResidence Address
 - 5 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000876947
<NAME>                        FirstFed Bancorp, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         7,181
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         5,774
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               22,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    11,865
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         15,545
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           15,556
<LOANS>                                        111,277
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,901
<DEPOSITS>                                     162,903
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            240
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       31
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 181,901
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4,976
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              661
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               782
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,419
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,425
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,425
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,994
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  57
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,015
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,015
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   644
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.7
<LOANS-NON>                                    320
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,138
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,081
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  101
<RECOVERIES>                                   34
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,071
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,071


</TABLE>
No. P68/73.

protests 62/5807, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Kao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise covered by the foregoing protests are the same in all material respects as the battery-operated mixmasters the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: bc979@lafn.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:15:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doug Hardie

Newbury Park, CA 91320
Case 3:06-cr-05452-KLS Document 37 Filed 06/09/08 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 97 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-01801-JPD Document 97 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Adrian Adams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:



Date: August 5, 2009

/s/ ADRIAN ADAMS Adrian Adams Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will be retained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Execute Sports, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd M Pitcher,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 30, 2006               /s/ Todd M Pitcher
                                   -------------------------
                                   Todd M Pitcher
                                   President
Fw: Revised language on RIA for SO 2 preamble EO 12866

Lydia Wegman to: Laity, James A., Mancini, Dominic J. 06/02/2010 04:23 PM

Cc: Ron Evans, Tricia Crabtree, Charlotte Bertrand, Bridgid Curry, Amy 

Lamson, Steve Page, Janet McCabe, Gina McCarthy, Lydia Wegman

Jim and Dom, 

Please find attached our proposed language to address the RIA primary estimate and sensitivity analysis 

in the section 12866 section of the SO2 preamble. We hope this meets your needs. Please let us know if 

you have any questions or comments. Thanks. 

Lydia
Before the First Division,

November 16, 1966

No. P66/338.

#### Accurate Millinery Co. *v.*United States, protest 65/18316 (New York).

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hoods similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 CCPA 229, C.A.D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 355/3 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 355 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 643 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 355

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 643 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 355/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 355/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 355/02 | State aid – Romania – State aid SA.59344 (2021/C, ex 2021/N) – Romania – Restructuring aid to TAROM – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 355/02

State aid – Romania – State aid SA.59344 (2021/C, ex 2021/N) – Romania – Restructuring aid to TAROM – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN