alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64672.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protests 295399-K, etc., (Seattle).

*310Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of liquefied petroleum gas similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Arthur J. Humphreys*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2112), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7553

OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CASSANDRA GORTON , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 6:17

- cv
- 02190

- RBH )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Olandio Ray Workman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have re viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Gorton , No. 6:17

- cv
- 02190

- RBH (D.S.C. Nov. 1, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions a re adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case No. 8,278.

#### In re LESZYNSKY.

[3 Ben. 487.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Nov., 1869.

Stay op Proceedings — Judgment Appealed From.

1. A judgment rendered against a bankrupt in a state court, from which he has appealed before the filing of his petition, is conclusive, as against him, to enable the judgment creditors to prove it as a debt in the bankruptcy proceedings.

2. Proceedings by the creditors, on such appeal from the judgment, will be stayed, on motion of the bankrupt, pending the bankruptcy proceedings.

The petition in these proceedings was filed cn the 4th of May, 1869. Before that time judgment had been recovered against the bankrupt [Henry S. Leszynsky] in the supreme court of the state of New York, and he had appealed from such judgment, giving security on such appeal. On the filing of his petition he obtained an injunction restraining the creditors from proceeding in the matter of the appeal. This injunction they moved to have modified, in order to enable them to determine the amount of their claim against the bankrupt, and to enforce their rights against the sureties. The bankrupt’s petition did not admit the claim of the judgment creditors against him, but stated the fact of the recovery of the judgment against him, the appeal and the giving of security on such appeal.

John A. Mapes for the motion.

P. J. Joachimssen in opposition.

BLATCHPORD, District Judge.

This motion must be denied. See Metcalf’s Case [Case No. 9,494], in which decision I concur. The judgment already recovered is conclusive, as against the bankrupt, to enable the creditors to prove it as a debt.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of SemiLEDs Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Trung Tri Doan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: February 7, 2013 |                                                |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                |
|                         | /s/ TRUNG TRI DOAN                                  |
|                         | Trung Tri Doan                                      |
|                         | *Chairman, President and   Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 202

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Capitol Police Board should exercise the authority granted to it under law to exempt members of the

United States Capitol Police with good service records from mandatory

separation from employment at 57 years of age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 20, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT (for himself and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Capitol Police

Board should exercise the authority granted to it under

law to exempt members of the United States Capitol

Police with good service records from mandatory separation from employment at 57 years of age.

Whereas the United States Capitol Police is facing a severe

manpower shortage;

Whereas taxpayers are forced to pay millions of dollars each

year in overtime for members of the United States Capitol Police;

Whereas having the United States Capitol Police retain experienced officers with good service records is a viable option to enhance the security of the Capitol complex and
2

•HCON 202 IH

reduce the costs associated with recruiting, hiring, and

training new officers; and

Whereas Congress should do everything in its power to ensure that the United States Capitol Police retains as

many experienced officers with good service records as

possible: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that in the

3 case of members of the United States Capitol Police with

4 good service records, the Capitol Police Board should exer5 cise the authority granted to it under sections 8335(d) and

6 8425(c) of title 5, United States Code, to exempt those

7 members from mandatory separation from employment at

8 57 years of age.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             364
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,295
<INVENTORY>                                     11,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,990
<PP&E>                                          17,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,400
<BONDS>                                         14,654
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,686
<SALES>                                         32,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,026
<CGS>                                           19,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,091
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,802
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
No. 69349.

#### The Rike Kumler Company *v.*United States,

protests 61/4561 and 61/4566 (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights or snow scenes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,703)
<INVENTORY>                                    414,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               504,092
<PP&E>                                         198,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                (93,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 636,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,213
<BONDS>                                         81,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   636,676
<SALES>                                      1,004,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,004,385
<CGS>                                          531,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  930,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,746
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,485
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,767)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
No. 53315.

protests 146075-K, etc. (New York).

#### Winthrop-Stearns, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ox gall the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
 BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING GROUP INC.
 FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Parsh Patel, am the Chief Executive Officer of Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Annual Report").
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


July 31, 2014
By:
/s/ Parsh PatelParsh PatelPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 99.2

COLLEGIATE FUNDING MASTER SERVICING, L.L.C.

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

The Bank of New York

10161 Centurion Parkway

Jacksonville, FL 32256

Collegiate Funding Services Education Loan Trust 2005-B

10304 Spotsylvania Avenue, Suite 100

Fredericksburg, VA 22408

Pursuant to Section 4.04(g) of the Indenture, dated July 1, 2005 (as amended, the
Indenture), between Collegiate Funding Services Education Loan Trust 2005-B, a statutory trust duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and The Bank of New York, a New York banking corporation, the undersigned
hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Collegiate Funding Master Servicing, L.L.C. (the Master Servicer) from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 has been made under my supervision, and
(ii) to the best of the knowledge of the undersigned, based on the review, the Master Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its material obligations under the Indenture throughout such period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that the Master Servicer has disclosed all significant deficiencies relating to the Master Servicers compliance with the
Indenture.

Collegiate Funding Master Servicing, L.L.C.



|    |  |                   
|--- |  | ------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Daniel A. Long
|    |  | Daniel A. Long    
|    |  | Vice President    
|    |  | February 27, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period
ended  September  30,  2004  (the  "Report")  of  FirstFed  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof, the undersigned,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


\s\ B. K. Goodwin, III                             November 15, 2004
-------------------------------------------        -----------------------------
B. K. Goodwin, III, Chief Executive Officer        Date


\s\ Lynn J. Joyce                                  November 15, 2004
-------------------------------------------        -----------------------------
Lynn J. Joyce, Chief Financial Officer             Date

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.  The  information
furnished  herein  shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  nor shall it be deemed  incorporated  by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
**EXHIBIT 4.7**

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO**

**SEASPAN CORPORATION**

**STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

**THIS FIRST AMENDMENT**(the “First Amendment”) to the Seaspan Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is effective as of October 23, 2010 (the “EffectiveDate”) and is made by Seaspan Corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan. 

**WHEREAS**, the Company previously adopted the Plan, under which the Company is authorized to grant equity-based incentive awards to certain Employees, Consultants and Directors of the Company;

**WHEREAS**, Section 7 of the Plan provides that the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) hasthe right to amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan without the consent of any stockholder, Participant, other holder or beneficiary of an Award, or other Person; and ****

**WHEREAS**, the Board has determined that it is desirable to amend the Plan to increase the maximum aggregate number of sharesthereunder and to amend the “Consultant” definition in the manner contemplated hereby. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**thePlan shall be amended as follows: 

I. Effective as of the Effective Date, Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted andreplaced in its entirety with the following: 

“(a) Shares Available. Subject to adjustment asprovided in paragraph (c) below, the number of Shares that may be issued with respect to Awards granted under the Plan shall be 2,000,000. If an Award is forfeited or otherwise lapses, expires, terminates or is canceled without the actualdelivery of Shares or is settled in cash, then the Shares covered by such Award, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration, lapse, termination, cancellation or cash settlement, shall again be Shares that may be issued with respect to Awardsgranted under the Plan. Shares tendered to or withheld by the Company to satisfy its tax withholding obligations or the exercise price shall be available for issuance under future Awards, subject to the overall limitation provided in the firstsentence above.” 

II. Effective as of the Effective Date, the definition of “Consultant” appearing inSection 2 of the Plan, is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

“‘Consultant’means any individual who is not an Employee or a Director and who provides consulting, advisory or other similar services to the Company or a subsidiary of the Company.” 

III. As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned officer of the Company acting pursuant to authority granted to him by the Board of Directors of the Company has executed this instrument on this 23rd day ofOctober**,** 2010.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jan Rogers Freeman, Individually and as 

Representative of the Estate of Michael 

Neal Freeman; Jennifer Paige Scoggins; 

Laurie Lynn Caves; and Ashley Michelle 

Kirkland, Appellants

No. 06-15-00106-CV v.

JI Specialty Services, Inc., York Risk 

Services Group, Inc., and Diana 

Maldonado, Appellees

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 15-

626). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellants pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 3, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Duncan G. Perry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 13, 2005 |  | /s/ DUNCAN G. PERRY    
|                       |  | Duncan G. Perry        
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.123 Closed-End Funds  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2016
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
2016   Q4
LineClosed-end funds; total financial assets
	FA554090005
	4.9
	1.7
	0.9
	2.0
	-2.3
	0.7
	-1.2
	2.7
	1.5
	1Closed-end funds; debt securities; asset
	FA554022005
	-2.7
	1.4
	1.0
	1.7
	-1.4
	1.4
	-1.4
	2.4
	1.5
	2Closed-end funds; Treasury securities; asset
	FA553061103
	-0.2
	-0.5
	-2.2
	-0.7
	-0.7
	-0.6
	-6.9
	0.3
	-1.7
	3Closed-end funds; municipal securities; asset
	FA553062003
	0.6
	-0.1
	0.4
	0.8
	-0.7
	1.2
	0.7
	-0.1
	0.0
	4Closed-end funds; corporate and foreign bonds; asset
	FA553063003
	-3.1
	1.9
	2.8
	1.7
	0.0
	0.8
	4.8
	2.3
	3.2
	5Closed-end funds; corporate equities; asset
	FA553064103
	7.6
	0.3
	-0.1
	0.3
	-0.9
	-0.8
	0.2
	0.3
	0.0
	6Closed-end funds; total financial assets
	FA554090005
	4.9
	1.7
	0.9
	2.0
	-2.3
	0.7
	-1.2
	2.7
	1.5
	7Closed-end funds; total financial assets in domestic equity funds
	FA554091603
	3.8
	0.1
	-0.0
	0.1
	-0.4
	-0.4
	0.1
	0.1
	0.0
	8Closed-end funds; total financial assets in world equity funds
	FA554092603
	0.5
	1.0
	-0.2
	1.2
	-0.3
	-0.1
	-1.0
	0.3
	-0.1
	9Closed-end funds; total financial assets in domestic taxable bond funds
	FA554091303
	0.3
	0.7
	1.2
	0.4
	-0.8
	-0.1
	0.9
	2.5
	1.6
	10Closed-end funds; total financial assets in municipal bond funds
	FA554091203
	0.6
	-0.1
	0.4
	0.8
	-0.7
	1.2
	0.7
	-0.1
	0.0
	11Closed-end funds; total financial assets in world bond funds
	FA554092303
	-0.2
	-0.1
	-0.5
	-0.5
	-0.0
	0.0
	-1.9
	-0.1
	-0.0
	12 Back to top
   Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
No. 53339.

petition 6572-R (Laredo).

#### J. C. Chambers *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Petitioner’s customhouse broker testified that prior to making entry, he had requested information from the Government appraiser as to whether there was a higher value, but the appraiser accepted his entered value. 'Subsequently, the collector filed appeal from the appraiser’s finding and the broker entered into a stipulation agreeing to the advance. He then attempted to .amend his entry but the amendment was too late. From the evidence it was held that the petitioner complied with the terms of section 489 in that he produced satisfactory evidence that the undervaluation of the merchandise was made without intent to defraud the Government or its officials and that he did not intend to withhold any information from the customs officials. The petition was therefore granted.