alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------




                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-32T1
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-32T1


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                   Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                   Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 247

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the importance of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and

blood donation and supporting National DonorDay.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 247

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas more than 70,000 individuals await organ transplants at any given moment;

Whereas another man, woman, or child is added to the national organ transplant waiting list every 16 minutes;

Whereas, despite the progress in the last 15 years, more than

10 people per day die because of a shortage of donor organs;
2

•HCON 247 EH

Whereas almost everyone is a potential organ, tissue, and

blood donor;

Whereas transplantation has become an element of mainstream medicine that prolongs and enhances life;

Whereas, for the third consecutive year, a coalition of health

organizations is joining forces for National Donor Day;

Whereas the first two National Donor Days raised a total of

nearly 17,000 units of blood, added over 2,400 potential

donors to the National Marrow Donor Program Registry,

and distributed tens of thousands of organ and tissue

pledge cards;

Whereas National Donor Day is America’s largest one-day

organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation event;

and

Whereas a number of businesses, foundations, health organizations, and the Department of Health and Human Services have designated February 12, 2000, as National

Donor Day: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) supports the goals and ideas of National

4 Donor Day;

5 (2) encourages all Americans to learn about the

6 importance of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood

7 donation and to discuss such donation with their

8 families and friends; and

9 (3) requests that the President issue a procla10 mation calling on the people of the United States to
3

•HCON 247 EH

1 conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, and pro2 grams to demonstrate support for organ, tissue,

3 bone marrow, and blood donation.

Passed the House of Representatives February 14,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2201

MICHAEL D. HARWLEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Lynchburg

. Robert Stewart Ballou, Magistrate Judge. ( 6:16

- cv - 00032

- RSB )

Submitted : February 28, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael D. Harwley, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Bender son, Evelyn Rose Marie Protano, Theresa Ann Casey, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublishe d opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael D. Harwley appeals the magistrate judge’s order upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Harwley’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income and the magistrate judge’s order denying Harwley’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion

. 1 “ In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold t he determination when an ALJ has applied correct legal standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.”
Brown v. Comm’ r Soc. Sec. Admin. , 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “ Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Pearson v. Colvin , 810 F.3d 204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (cita tion and internal quotation marks omitted). “In reviewing for substantial evidence, we do not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. Where conflicting evidence allows re asonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is disabled, the responsibility for that decision falls on the ALJ.” Hancock v. Astrue , 667 F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted).

1 The parties consented to a final disposition by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).3 We have reviewed the r ecord and perceive no reversible error. The ALJ applied the correct legal standards in evaluating Harwley’s claims for benefits, and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperi s and affirm the orders upholding the denial of benefits and denying Rule 59(e) relief

. See Harwley v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin. , No. 6:16

- cv - 00032

- RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2017 ; Oct. 5, 2017 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 2

AFFIRMED

2 For this reason, we deny Harwley’s motion to participate in oral argument.
No. 61117.

protest 293988-K (New York).

#### Surface Freight Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
Case 3:06-mc-05016-FDB-JKA Document 4 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-mc-05016-FDB-JKA Document 4 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-mc-05016-FDB-JKA Document 4 Filed 07/18/06 Page 3 of 3
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 174

Supporting religious tolerance toward Muslims.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1999

Mr. BONIOR (for himself and Mr. DAVIS of Virginia) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting religious tolerance toward Muslims.

Whereas the American Muslim community, comprised of approximately 5,000,000 people, is a vital part of our Nation, with more than 1,500 mosques, Islamic schools, and

Islamic centers in neighborhoods across the United

States;

Whereas Islam is one of the great Abrahamic faiths, whose

significant contributions throughout history have advanced the fields of math, science, medicine, law, philosophy, art, and literature;

Whereas the United States is a secular nation, with an unprecedented commitment to religious tolerance and pluralism, where the rights, liberties, and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution are guaranteed to all citizens regardless of religious affiliation;
2

•HCON 174 IH

Whereas Muslims have been subjected, simply because of

their faith, to acts of discrimination and harassment that

all too often have led to hate-inspired violence, as was the

case during the rush to judgment in the aftermath of the

tragic Oklahoma City bombing;

Whereas discrimination against Muslims intimidates American Muslims and may prevent Muslims from freely expressing their opinions and exercising their religious beliefs as guaranteed by the first amendment to the Constitution;

Whereas American Muslims have regrettably been portrayed

in a negative light in some discussions of policy issues

such as issues relating to religious persecution abroad or

fighting terrorism in the United States;

Whereas stereotypes and anti-Muslim rhetoric have also contributed to a backlash against Muslims in some neighborhoods across the United States; and

Whereas all persons in the United States who espouse and

adhere to the values of the founders of our Nation should

help in the fight against bias, bigotry, and intolerance in

all their forms and from all their sources: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress condemns anti-Muslim intolerance

4 and discrimination as wholly inconsistent with the

5 American values of religious tolerance and pluralism;

6 (2) while Congress respects and upholds the

7 right of individuals to free speech, Congress ac-
3

•HCON 174 IH

1 knowledges that individuals and organizations that

2 foster such intolerance create an atmosphere of ha3 tred and fear that divides the Nation;

4 (3) Congress resolves to uphold a level of polit5 ical discourse that does not involve making a scape6 goat of an entire religion or drawing political conclu7 sions on the basis of religious doctrine; and

8 (4) Congress recognizes the contributions of

9 American Muslims, who are followers of one of the

10 three major monotheistic religions of the world and

11 one of the fastest growing faiths in the United

12 States.

Æ
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 240

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to democracy and human

rights in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 2, 1998

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. GRAMS, and Mr. SMITH of Oregon) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to democracy

and human rights in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic.

Whereas in 1975, the Pathet Lao party supplanted the existing Lao government and the Lao Royal Family, and established a ‘‘people’s democratic republic’’, in violation of

the 1962 Declaration on the Neutrality of Laos and its

Protocol, as well as the 1973 Vientiane Agreement on

Laos;

Whereas since the 1975 overthrow of the existing Lao government, Laos has been under the sole control of the Lao

People’s Democratic Party;

Whereas the present Lao Constitution provides for human

rights protection for the Lao people, and Laos is a signa-
2

SRES 240 IS

tory to international agreements on civil and political

rights;

Whereas Laos has become a member of the Association of

Southeast Asian Nations, which calls for the creation of

open societies in each of its member states by the year

2020;

Whereas despite that, the State Department’s ‘‘Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1997’’ notes that

the government has only slowly eased restrictions on

basic freedoms and begun codification of implementing

legislation for rights stipulated in the Lao Constitution,

and continues to significantly restrict the freedoms of

speech, assembly, and religion; and

Whereas on January 30, 1998, the Lao government arrested

and detained forty-four individuals at a Bible study meeting in Vientiane and on March 25 sentenced thirteen

Christians from the group to prison terms of three to five

years for ‘‘creating divisions among the people, undermining the government, and accepting foreign funds to

promote religion’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 present government of Laos should—

3 (1) respect international norms of human rights

4 and democratic freedoms for the Lao people, and

5 fully honor its commitments to those norms and

6 freedoms as embodied in its constitution and inter7 national agreements, and in the 1962 Declaration on

8 the Neutrality of Laos and its Protocol and the

9 1973 Vientiane Agreement on Laos;
3

SRES 240 IS

1 (2) issue a public statement specifically re2 affirming its commitment to protecting religious

3 freedom; and

4 (3) fully institute a process of democracy,

5 human rights, and openly-contested free and fair

6 elections in Laos, and ensure specifically that the

7 National Assembly elections—currently scheduled

8 for 2002—are openly contested.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors
Paracel Online Systems, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-3 and related Prospectus of WavePhore, Inc. for the registration of
5,727,277 shares of its common stock of our report dated July 3, 1997, with
respect to the balance sheets of Paracel Online Systems, Inc. (formally
Carthage International, Inc.) (a wholly owned subsidiary of Paracel, Inc.) as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the period from January 1,
1995 to December 4, 1995 (Predecessor), the period from December 5, 1995
(acquisition) to December 31, 1995 and the year ended December 31, 1996
(Successor), which report appears in Form 8-K/A of WavePhore, Inc. dated August
12, 1997.

                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
August 20, 1997
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



                          ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                           Nine Months
                                                                       Ended September 30,
                                                                  ---------------------------
                                                                      1996            1997
                                                                  ------------   ------------
                                                                          (unaudited)
<S>                                                               <C>              <C>       
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expensed .......................................      $  6,996          $  70,860
   Interest capitalized ....................................        10,013             24,868
                                                                  --------          ---------
       Total interest expense ..............................        17,009             95,728
Interest component of rent expense .........................         1,255              2,725
Amortization of debt issuance costs ........................           438              2,978
                                                                  --------          ---------
       Total Fixed Charges .................................      $ 18,702          $ 101,431
                                                                  ========          =========
                                                                                    
Earnings:                                                                           
   Income from continuing operations                                         
       before income taxes .................................      $ 19,747          $  58,408
   Plus fixed charges ......................................        18,702            101,431
   Less interest capitalized ...............................       (10,013)           (24,868)
                                                                  --------          ---------
       Total Earnings ......................................      $ 28,436          $ 134,971
                                                                  ========          =========
                                                                                    
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .........................         1.52X              1.33X
                                                                  ========          =========
</TABLE>
. . . . 

: : 

i 

*..,:*.. 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

1 ^_-.,......._._.__.,_ _^ __._ ...~,._ -- 
Honorable George. W. 00x, Pago 2 

or allotments or funda ircm the UnItod Statra 

Oorornmont to be used on Stats oooparatlte and 

other Podoral pro aota 

olu&Ing oonstruot J 

and programs In Texas, Inon 

and inpraremonta . 

ot publio buildInga, rrpafro, 

Any of auoh Fedora1 iundo OS 

may be deposited In the State ‘l’roaaur~ l m honbr 

approprlatod to the l pooltlo purpose authorltad 

br the Fadoral Gotetrmnt, and aubjeot to tha 

lIm$tatIon plaoed on this Aot.’ 

**has rules and n@ulatIons of the lrodiral 

Works AdminIstratIon require Fadaral funds to ba 

kept In a a@parato aooount marked *ConatruotIon 

Fuad ior Dookrt !&x08 W-257*. Wo hero alrrady 

contarred rith the oitioIal8 of the Austin Sotional Bank, Austin, TIxaa, and hate oeourod a 

atatonmat rror the Vlor-Prealdant that h) till 

reoairr and dlaburao thoso Federal iundo in aooordanoe rlth the requirements. 

*A:portIon 0r the rui0 for the abotr dw4 

bored dooket wer’o approprlatrd by tha 47th Lm&ii 

laturo, and of oourae, thsao iundo an la thr 

Stats Trmaury, and we would prefer to deposit 

‘the Fedora1 funds In the Mate !Preaaur~ ia order 

to ham all funda In one plaoo. ‘. 

V?b ihall Oak you to ad~Iar us whather PO&- 

oral fundr plaoed In the State Traaaury oan ba 

draIgnatod la l oook da nouiith a tho’rulra and rrgulatlona of %he ?e&rral Works A&ainIatfat~on, and 

whothor th6y oan bo drawn out on .ohaokr or. *orrants rignod by’s nproaentatlro of the Ownor 

(the Stat@ of Texas) on proper preamtatIon o? 

aatimatrs, vouohara and requIaItfona. 

*. . . .* 

It la our opinion that tha Stat0 Traasurrr is authorized to aoorpt and you to deposit the funds graatod by 

the Fodrral Works AdmlnlatratIon and that thr Same may bo 

oarrlrd by the ‘Troaaursr undrr the dooket number aaai8nod 
by”the Fedarol Works AdmInlstratIon and that tIm earns oan 

bete;un out from tlma to tlm by warrant upon proper requl- 

. 

Yours Yarr truly 

K&R 28, 1942 

n 

ATTORNEY (3ltNERAL OS TEXAS 

BY 

Aallatant
Date,Household Net Worth,Total,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt; Households,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt; Businesses,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt; State and local govts.,Growth of domestic nonfinancial debt; Federal government
2006,66073,8.4,10.5,9.8,3.9,3.9
2007,66536,8.1,7.2,12.4,5.5,4.7
2008,56159,5.8,-0.1,6.0,0.6,21.4
2009,58066,3.5,0.3,-4.1,4.0,20.4
2010,62275,4.4,-0.5,-0.7,2.3,18.5
2011,63423,3.5,-0.5,2.8,-1.7,10.8
2012,69579,5.0,1.9,4.7,-0.2,10.1
2013,79390,4.0,1.7,4.9,-1.3,6.7
2014,84189,4.5,3.1,6.3,-0.5,5.4
2015,86797,4.5,2.8,6.6,1.8,5.0
2013:Q4,79390,6.0,1.5,3.9,-2.8,14.4
2014:Q1,80626,4.1,1.9,6.3,-1.7,5.7
2014:Q2,82242,4.3,5.2,5.2,0.1,3.5
2014:Q3,82520,4.5,3.0,5.9,-1.7,6.0
2014:Q4,84189,4.7,2.2,7.0,1.5,5.9
2015:Q1,85996,2.6,1.8,7.5,4.3,-1.1
2015:Q2,86481,4.6,4.3,8.4,1.0,2.4
2015:Q3,85160,2.1,1.6,4.9,1.7,0.2
2015:Q4,86797,8.6,3.4,5.0,0.0,18.5
Before the Second Division,

March 21, 1962

No. 66600.

#### Ronco Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 316131-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal magnetos and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ronco Corporation*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 253, C.D. 2184), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 13, 2023.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *KCApplicationComments@kc.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *State Holding, Inc., Richmond, Missouri;*                     to become a bank holding company by acquiring The State Bank, Richmond, Missouri.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-22590 Filed 10-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P