alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 302 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 302

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling on the people of the United States to observe a National Moment 
of Remembrance to honor the men and women of the United States who died 
                  in the pursuit of freedom and peace.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 302

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the preservation of basic freedoms and world peace has always been a 
        valued objective of this nation;
Whereas thousands of American men and women have selflessly given their lives in 
        service as peacemakers and peacekeepers;
Whereas greater strides should be made to demonstrate appreciation for these 
        loyal Americans and the ultimate sacrifice they each made;
Whereas Memorial Day is an appropriate day to remember American heroes by 
        inviting the people of the United States to honor these heroes at a 
        designated time;
Whereas Memorial Day needs to be made relevant to both present and future 
        generations of Americans; and
Whereas a National Moment of Remembrance each Memorial Day at 3:00 p.m., local 
        time, would provide the people of the United States an opportunity to 
        participate in a symbolic act of American unity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) calls on the people of the United States to observe a 
        National Moment of Remembrance to honor the men and women of 
        the United States who died in the pursuit of freedom and peace; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to observe such a 
        National Moment of Remembrance.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Official Journal C 44/6 Fe

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 44 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 616 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 44

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 616 February 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 44/01 | Common Catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — first supplement to the 36th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 44/01

Common Catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — first supplement to the 36th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# L_2021462DE.01001901.xml

| 28.12.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 462/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 462/19

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2021/2178 der Kommission vom 6. Juli 2021 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) 2020/852 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates durch Festlegung des Inhalts und der Darstellung der Informationen, die von Unternehmen, die unter Artikel 19a oder Artikel 29a der Richtlinie 2013/34/EU fallen, in Bezug auf ökologisch nachhaltige Wirtschaftstätigkeiten offenzulegen sind, und durch Festlegung der Methode, anhand deren die Einhaltung dieser Offenlegungspflicht zu gewährleisten ist

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 443 vom 10. Dezember 2021
  )

Auf Seite 51, Anhang VI Nummer 4, erhält die Tabelle folgende Fassung:

„

  Image 1

  “

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of our report dated
February 2, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1998 and our report dated March 24, 1999 on the
financial statement schedule included therein, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Tucson, Arizona
December 7, 1999

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Michael J. O'Donnell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        /s/ Michael J. O'Donnell
                                        ----------------------------------------
Dated: February 14, 2003                Michael J. O'Donnell
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Before Judge Watson,

October 24, 1966

No. R66/57.

#### Continental Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R64/10521 and R64/10522 (New York).

*851In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Panation Trade Co.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 758, A.R.D. 181), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the cigarette lighters here in question and that such value is equal to the appraised values, less inspection fees in the sum of $0.05 per dozen.
No. P68/63.

protests 65/25579, 66/2710, and 66/6964 (New York).

#### Miya Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*999Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of stone lanterns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Otagiri Mercantile Co., Inc.,*and *Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 184, C.D. 2173), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 130

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Toro Ventures Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), eachof the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

| October 13, 2006 | By: /s/ "Yan Liu"                                                    |
|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|             | Yan Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief      Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case No. 6,584a.

#### HOGAN v. TAYLOR.

[Hempst. 20.] 1

Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.

Aug., 1822.

Judgment — Amount Claimed.

The judgment cannot exceed the amount claimed in the declaration.

[This was a suit by Edmund P. Hogan against Creed Taylor.]

PEE CUKIAM.

■ The judgment in this case being, rendered for fifty dollars more than the amount claimed in the declaration, is manifestly erroneous, and must be reversed; it being well established, that a greater amount cannot be given than claimed in the declaration. 1 Chit. Pl. 372; Yel. 45; 10 Coke, 117; 3 Com. Dig. tit. “Damages,” E. 3. Eeversed.
# Official Journal C 75/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.075.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 75 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5714 March 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.075.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 75

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5714 March 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 075/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2014/C 075/02 | New national sides of euro circulation coins | 2 |
| 2014/C 075/03 | Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 075/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2014/C 075/02

New national sides of euro circulation coins

2

2014/C 075/03

Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 075/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7151 — BNP Paribas/Certain Assets of Royal Bank of Scotland) (1) | 8 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 075/05 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 9 |
| 2014/C 075/06 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 16 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 075/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7151 — BNP Paribas/Certain Assets of Royal Bank of Scotland) (1)

8

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 075/05

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

9

2014/C 075/06

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

16

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 167

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to permit

Louisiana Avenue Northwest.Northwest, between 2nd Street Northwest andstruction of a building on Constitution AvenueCapitol Grounds that may be necessary for contemporary construction and other work on the
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 167

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS.

4 The Architect of the Capitol may permit temporary

5 construction and other work on the Capitol Grounds that
2

•HCON 167 EH

1 may be necessary for construction of a building on Con2 stitution Avenue Northwest, between 2nd Street North3 west and Louisiana Avenue Northwest. Such work may

4 include activities resulting in temporary obstruction of a

5 curbside parking lane on Louisiana Avenue Northwest and

6 on Constitution Avenue Northwest, between 2nd Street

7 Northwest and Louisiana Avenue Northwest.

8 SEC. 2. PERIOD OF USE.

9 Work on the Capitol Grounds under section 1 is au10 thorized during the period beginning August 6, 1999, and

11 ending October 31, 2001, or such longer period as the Ar12 chitect of the Capitol determines necessary.

13 SEC. 3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Work on the Capitol Grounds

15 under section 1 may not begin until the Architect of the

16 Capitol receives such assurances as the Architect may re17 quire to ensure that—

18 (1) all areas of the Capitol Grounds that are

19 disturbed by reason of such work will be restored to

20 their original condition without expense to the

21 United States; and

22 (2) such work will be carried out so as not to

23 interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi24 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Cap25 itol.
3

•HCON 167 EH

1 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The United

2 States shall not incur any expense or liability incident to

3 any activity associated with work on the Capitol Grounds

4 under section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives August 3,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
exercise_name,dt_exercise_quarter,id_rssd,disclosure_legal_name,scenario_id,scenario_name,loss_trading_counterparty_amt2023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,1039502,JPMorgan Chase & Co.,3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,15.72023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,1073757,Bank of America Corporation,3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,8.52023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,1111435,State Street Corporation,3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,0.72023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,1120754,Wells Fargo & Company,3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,12.42023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,1951350,Citigroup Inc.,3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,11.32023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,2162966,Morgan Stanley,3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,10.72023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,2380443,"The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.",3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,18.12023 Exploratory Market Shock,12/31/2022,3587146,The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation,3,Supervisory Severely Adverse,0.8,,,,,,
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL GREEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3953

[March 1, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-017459 CF10A.

Michael Green, Defuniak Springs, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
October 16, 1959

No. 63458.

protest 58/16944.

#### W. A. Lee Co. *v.*United States,

Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, November 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 9, 2023, at 
2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information, please contact 
Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda 
includes a committee discussion that may involve On-line Chat feature, 
On-hold Music, Identity Theft Prevention and Victim Assistance 
Measures, Dashboard Data for Where's My Refund, and The Right to 
Quality Service on the Phone Line.

    Dated: October 10, 2023.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2023-22729 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 51505.

#### Protest 121346-K of Dixie Bottle & Beverage Co. (Savannah).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The report of the discharging inspector showed that the shipment of brandy was received in good order, except that 539 bottles were broken, and 2 cases and 13 bottles were short. The collector’s answer to protest disclosed that an allowance in duties was made for the 2 cases and 13 bottles re*140ported short by the discharging inspector, but that the collector disallowed the claim for the 539 broken bottles. Inasmuch as the evidence established that the importer did not file an affidavit under the provisions of paragraph 813, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, verifying the report of breakage reported by the customs officials, it was held that the importer was not entitled to any allowance as to losses through breakage of the bottles. *(Park & Tilford Import Corp.*v. *United States,*26 C. C. P. A. 342, C. A. D. 38, cited.) The collector also refused to make an allowance in duties for the 185.1 gallons of brandy claimed to have been lost in the filtering and rebottling process in warehouse. In view of the mandatory provisions of the statute as to the manner in which refund of duties for loss of liquors through breakage may be obtained, and the construction of section 562 relating to manipulation of liquors in warehouse by the appellate court in *United States*v. *Siegfried Lowenthal Co.*(31 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 244), it was held that the importer is not entitled to any refund of duties either upon the losses discovered at the time of rebottling or the losses due to, breakage. The protest was therefore overruled.
---

Exhibit 99.13


CONSENT OF DAVID DREISINGER Reference is made to the technical report entitled Technical Report Updatedated March 2, 2010, which the undersigned has prepared for Baja Mining Corp. (the Technical Report). I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp., and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (333-165352) of Baja Mining Corp. Dated this 30th day of March, 2012. /s/David DreisingerName: David Dreisinger


---
No. 67233.

protests 62/3328, etc. (Savannah).

#### Ernest Greenwood Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
- 257 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski 

Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff, 

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland & 

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, 

appellee and cross-appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., 

for appellant.

Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. 

Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., 

L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick.

Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law 

Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.

Heavican, C.J., Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and 

Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed 

by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/09/2021 08:09 AM CDT
- 258 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group, 307 Neb. 

599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020).

We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule 

it, but modify the opinion as follows:

(1) In the background section, under the subheading 

“Peremptory Challenges,” we withdraw the last sentence of 

the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a 

marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental transcript, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in 

the appellate record.”

(2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “Peremptory 

Challenges (Assignment of Error No. 1),” we withdraw the 

seventh paragraph and substitute the following:

We do not decide that question here. While KPG has 

offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental 

transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the 

roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that 

it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the 

record is insufficient to support its assignment of error 

even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

Miller-Lerman, J., not participating.