# Official Journal C 200/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.200.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 200 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 557 July 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.200.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 200

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 557 July 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2012/C 200/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 194, 30.6.2012 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2012/C 200/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 194, 30.6.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2012/C 200/02 | Case C-348/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 May 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — P. I. v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Freedom of movement for persons — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 28(3)(a) — Expulsion decision — Criminal conviction — Imperative grounds of public security) | 2 |
| 2012/C 200/03 | Case C-97/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Palermo — Italy) — Amia SpA, in liquidation v Provincia Regionale di Palermo (Environment — Landfill of waste — Directive 1999/31/EC — Special levy on the disposal of solid waste in landfills — Landfill operator subject to that levy — Operating costs of a landfill — Directive 2000/35/EC — Default interest — Obligations of the national court) | 2 |
| 2012/C 200/04 | Case C-98/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon) | 3 |
| 2012/C 200/05 | Case C-188/11: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 May 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien — Austria) — Peter Hehenberger v Republik Österreich (Agriculture — European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund — Regulations (EC) No 1257/1999 and No 817/2004 — Financial support for agri-environmental production methods — Checks — Beneficiary of agricultural aid — Fact of having prevented an on-the-spot check from being carried out — National legislation requiring the repayment of all aid paid over several years — Whether compatible) | 3 |
| 2012/C 200/06 | Case C-196/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Formula One Licensing BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Global Sports Media Ltd (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative mark ‘F1-Live’ — Opposition by the proprietor of international and national word marks F1 and Community figurative mark F1 Formula 1 — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive element — Removal of the protection provided to an earlier national trade mark — Likelihood of confusion) | 4 |
| 2012/C 200/07 | Case C-352/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/1/EC — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Requirements for the granting of permits for existing installations — Obligation to ensure the operation of such installations in accordance with the requirements of that directive) | 4 |
| 2012/C 200/08 | Case C-366/11: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — European Union action in the field of water policy — River basin management plans — Publication and notification to the Commission — Lack — Public information and consultation concerning the draft management plans — Lack) | 5 |
| 2012/C 200/09 | Case C-166/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Praze (Czech Republic) lodged on 3 April 2012 — Radek Časta v Česká správa sociálního zabezpečení | 5 |
| 2012/C 200/10 | Case C-177/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg lodged on 17 April 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Salim Lachheb, Nadia Lachheb | 6 |
| 2012/C 200/11 | Case C-184/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 20 April 2012 — United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (UNAMAR) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare | 6 |
| 2012/C 200/12 | Case C-195/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour Constitutionnelle, Belgium lodged on 26 April 2012 — I.B.V & Cie SA (Industrie du bois de Vielsalm & Cie SA) v Walloon Region | 7 |
| 2012/C 200/13 | Case C-209/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 3 May 2012 — Walter Endress v Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG | 7 |
| 2012/C 200/14 | Case C-239/12 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2012 by Abdulbasit Abdulrahim against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2012 in Case T-127/09: Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union, European Commission | 8 |
| 2012/C 200/15 | Case C-245/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 8 |
| 2012/C 200/16 | Case C-246/12 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2012 by Ellinika Nafpigia AE against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2012 in Case T-391/08 Ellinika Nafpigia v European Commission | 9 |
| 2012/C 200/17 | Case C-248/12 P: Appeal brought on 22 May 2012 by Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 6 March 2012 in Case T-453/10: Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v European Commission | 9 |
| 2012/C 200/18 | Case C-251/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles (Belgium), lodged on 22 May 2012 — Christian van Buggenhout and Ilse van de Mierop (lawyers acting as administrators in the insolvency of Grontimmo SA) v Banque Internationale à Luxembourg | 10 |
| 2012/C 200/19 | Case C-494/10: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 7 May 2012 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen — Germany) — Dr Biner Bähr in his capacity as liquidator in respect of the assets of Hertie GmbH v HIDD Hamburg-Bramfeld B.V.1 | 10 |
| | General Court |
| 2012/C 200/20 | Case T-111/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — MasterCard and Others v Commission (Competition — Decision by an association of undertakings — Market for the provision of debit, charge and credit card transaction acquiring services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Multilateral fallback interchange fees — Article 81(1) and (3) EC — Concept of ancillary restriction — No objective necessity — Restriction of competition by effect — Conditions for the grant of an individual exemption — Rights of the defence — Remedy — Periodic penalty payment — Statement of reasons — Proportionality) | 11 |
| 2012/C 200/21 | Case T-371/09: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Retractable Technologies v OHIM — Abbott Laboratories (RT) (Community trade mark — Opposition Procedure — Application for figurative Community mark FT — Earlier national word mark RTH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 11 |
| 2012/C 200/22 | Case T-169/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Industria Licorera Quezalteca (TORO XL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark TORO XL — Early Community figurative mark XL — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No likelihood of confusion) | 12 |
| 2012/C 200/23 | Case T-233/10: Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2012 — Nike International v OHIM — Intermar Simanto Nahmias (JUMPMAN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark JUMPMAN — Earlier national word mark JUMP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 12 |
| 2012/C 200/24 | Case T-273/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Olive Line International v OHIM — Umbria Olii International (O·LIVE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark O·LIVE — Earlier Community and Spanish figurative and word marks Olive line — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 13 |
| 2012/C 200/25 | Case T-546/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Nordmilch v OHIM — Lactimilk (MILRAM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MILRAM — Earlier national word and figurative marks RAM — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of goods and signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 13 |
| 2012/C 200/26 | Case T-555/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — JBF RAK v Council (Subsidies — Imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates — Definitive countervailing duty and definite collection of provisional duty — Articles 11(8), 15(1) and 30(5) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 — Principle of sound administration) | 13 |
| 2012/C 200/27 | Case T-570/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Environmental Manufacturing v OHIM — Wolf (Representation of the head of a wolf) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wolf’s head — Earlier national and international figurative marks WOLF Jardin and Outils WOLF — Relative grounds for refusal — Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 14 |
| 2012/C 200/28 | Case T-585/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Aitic Penteo v OHIM — Atos Worldline (PENTEO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PENTEO — Earlier Benelux and international word marks XENTEO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 14 |
| 2012/C 200/29 | Case T-60/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Kraft Foods Global Brands v OHIM — fenaco (SUISSE PREMIUM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark SUISSE PREMIUM — Earlier Community figurative mark Premium — Absolute ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Opposition rejected — Article8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 15 |
| 2012/C 200/30 | Case T-110/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Asa v OHIM — Merck (FEMIFERAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark FEMIFERAL — Earlier national word mark Feminatal and earlier national figurative mark feminatal — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 15 |
| 2012/C 200/31 | Case T-152/11: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — TMS Trademark-Schutzrechtsverwertungsgesellschaft v OHIM — Comercial Jacinto Parera (MAD) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community figurative mark MAD — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 15 |
| 2012/C 200/32 | Case T-179/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Sport Eybl & Sports Experts v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN SUMMITS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark SEVEN SUMMITS — Earlier Community figurative mark Seven — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 16 |
| 2012/C 200/33 | Case T-317/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Vakalis v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Calculation of years of pensionable service — General implementing provisions — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of the right to be heard — Equal treatment) | 16 |
| 2012/C 200/34 | Case T-314/11: Order of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Fortress Participations v OHIM — FIG and Fortress Investment Group (FORTRESS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate) | 16 |
| 2012/C 200/35 | Case T-315/11: Order of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Fortress Participations v OHIM — FIG and Fortress Investment Group (FORTRESS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate) | 17 |
| 2012/C 200/36 | Case T-183/12: Action brought on 25 April 2012 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaiki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis v European Police Office (Europol) | 17 |
| 2012/C 200/37 | Case T-184/12: Action brought on 26 April 2012 — Moonich Produktkonzepte & Realisierung v OHIM — Thermofilm Australia (HEATSTRIP) | 18 |
| 2012/C 200/38 | Case T-186/12: Action brought on 26 April 2012 — Verus v OHIM — Maquet (LUCEA LED) | 18 |
| 2012/C 200/39 | Case T-198/12: Action brought on 14 May 2012 — Germany v Commission | 19 |
| 2012/C 200/40 | Case T-213/12: Action brought on 23 May 2012 — Elitaliana v Eulex Kosovo and Starlite Aviation Operations | 20 |
| 2012/C 200/41 | Case T-571/08 RENV: Order of the General Court of 10 May 2012 — Germany v Commission | 20 |
| 2012/C 200/42 | Case T-211/11: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission | 20 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2012/C 200/43 | Case F-43/12: Action brought on 30 March 2012 — ZZ v EIGE | 21 |
| 2012/C 200/44 | Case F-45/12: Action brought on 10th April 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 21 |
| 2012/C 200/45 | Case F-52/12: Action brought on 7 May 2012 — ZZ v European Parliament | 22 |
| 2012/C 200/46 | Case F-53/12: Action brought on 7 May 2012 — ZZ and Others v European Economic and Social Committee | 22 |
| 2012/C 200/47 | Case F-55/12: Action brought on 22 May 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v European Commission | 23 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2012/C 200/02

Case C-348/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 May 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — P. I. v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Freedom of movement for persons — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 28(3)(a) — Expulsion decision — Criminal conviction — Imperative grounds of public security)

2

2012/C 200/03

Case C-97/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Palermo — Italy) — Amia SpA, in liquidation v Provincia Regionale di Palermo (Environment — Landfill of waste — Directive 1999/31/EC — Special levy on the disposal of solid waste in landfills — Landfill operator subject to that levy — Operating costs of a landfill — Directive 2000/35/EC — Default interest — Obligations of the national court)

2

2012/C 200/04

Case C-98/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon)

3

2012/C 200/05

Case C-188/11: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 May 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien — Austria) — Peter Hehenberger v Republik Österreich (Agriculture — European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund — Regulations (EC) No 1257/1999 and No 817/2004 — Financial support for agri-environmental production methods — Checks — Beneficiary of agricultural aid — Fact of having prevented an on-the-spot check from being carried out — National legislation requiring the repayment of all aid paid over several years — Whether compatible)

3

2012/C 200/06

Case C-196/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Formula One Licensing BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Global Sports Media Ltd (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative mark ‘F1-Live’ — Opposition by the proprietor of international and national word marks F1 and Community figurative mark F1 Formula 1 — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive element — Removal of the protection provided to an earlier national trade mark — Likelihood of confusion)

4

2012/C 200/07

Case C-352/11: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/1/EC — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Requirements for the granting of permits for existing installations — Obligation to ensure the operation of such installations in accordance with the requirements of that directive)

4

2012/C 200/08

Case C-366/11: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — European Union action in the field of water policy — River basin management plans — Publication and notification to the Commission — Lack — Public information and consultation concerning the draft management plans — Lack)

5

2012/C 200/09

Case C-166/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Praze (Czech Republic) lodged on 3 April 2012 — Radek Časta v Česká správa sociálního zabezpečení

5

2012/C 200/10

Case C-177/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg lodged on 17 April 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Salim Lachheb, Nadia Lachheb

6

2012/C 200/11

Case C-184/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 20 April 2012 — United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (UNAMAR) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare

6

2012/C 200/12

Case C-195/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour Constitutionnelle, Belgium lodged on 26 April 2012 — I.B.V & Cie SA (Industrie du bois de Vielsalm & Cie SA) v Walloon Region

7

2012/C 200/13

Case C-209/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 3 May 2012 — Walter Endress v Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG

7

2012/C 200/14

Case C-239/12 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2012 by Abdulbasit Abdulrahim against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2012 in Case T-127/09: Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union, European Commission

8

2012/C 200/15

Case C-245/12: Action brought on 16 May 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

8

2012/C 200/16

Case C-246/12 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2012 by Ellinika Nafpigia AE against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2012 in Case T-391/08 Ellinika Nafpigia v European Commission

9

2012/C 200/17

Case C-248/12 P: Appeal brought on 22 May 2012 by Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 6 March 2012 in Case T-453/10: Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v European Commission

9

2012/C 200/18

Case C-251/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles (Belgium), lodged on 22 May 2012 — Christian van Buggenhout and Ilse van de Mierop (lawyers acting as administrators in the insolvency of Grontimmo SA) v Banque Internationale à Luxembourg

10

2012/C 200/19

Case C-494/10: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 7 May 2012 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen — Germany) — Dr Biner Bähr in his capacity as liquidator in respect of the assets of Hertie GmbH v HIDD Hamburg-Bramfeld B.V.1

10

General Court

2012/C 200/20

Case T-111/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — MasterCard and Others v Commission (Competition — Decision by an association of undertakings — Market for the provision of debit, charge and credit card transaction acquiring services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Multilateral fallback interchange fees — Article 81(1) and (3) EC — Concept of ancillary restriction — No objective necessity — Restriction of competition by effect — Conditions for the grant of an individual exemption — Rights of the defence — Remedy — Periodic penalty payment — Statement of reasons — Proportionality)

11

2012/C 200/21

Case T-371/09: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Retractable Technologies v OHIM — Abbott Laboratories (RT) (Community trade mark — Opposition Procedure — Application for figurative Community mark FT — Earlier national word mark RTH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

11

2012/C 200/22

Case T-169/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Industria Licorera Quezalteca (TORO XL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark TORO XL — Early Community figurative mark XL — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No likelihood of confusion)

12

2012/C 200/23

Case T-233/10: Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2012 — Nike International v OHIM — Intermar Simanto Nahmias (JUMPMAN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark JUMPMAN — Earlier national word mark JUMP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

12

2012/C 200/24

Case T-273/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Olive Line International v OHIM — Umbria Olii International (O·LIVE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark O·LIVE — Earlier Community and Spanish figurative and word marks Olive line — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

13

2012/C 200/25

Case T-546/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Nordmilch v OHIM — Lactimilk (MILRAM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MILRAM — Earlier national word and figurative marks RAM — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of goods and signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

13

2012/C 200/26

Case T-555/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — JBF RAK v Council (Subsidies — Imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates — Definitive countervailing duty and definite collection of provisional duty — Articles 11(8), 15(1) and 30(5) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 — Principle of sound administration)

13

2012/C 200/27

Case T-570/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Environmental Manufacturing v OHIM — Wolf (Representation of the head of a wolf) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wolf’s head — Earlier national and international figurative marks WOLF Jardin and Outils WOLF — Relative grounds for refusal — Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

14

2012/C 200/28

Case T-585/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Aitic Penteo v OHIM — Atos Worldline (PENTEO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PENTEO — Earlier Benelux and international word marks XENTEO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009)

14

2012/C 200/29

Case T-60/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Kraft Foods Global Brands v OHIM — fenaco (SUISSE PREMIUM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark SUISSE PREMIUM — Earlier Community figurative mark Premium — Absolute ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Opposition rejected — Article8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

15

2012/C 200/30

Case T-110/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Asa v OHIM — Merck (FEMIFERAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark FEMIFERAL — Earlier national word mark Feminatal and earlier national figurative mark feminatal — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

15

2012/C 200/31

Case T-152/11: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — TMS Trademark-Schutzrechtsverwertungsgesellschaft v OHIM — Comercial Jacinto Parera (MAD) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community figurative mark MAD — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009)

15

2012/C 200/32

Case T-179/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Sport Eybl & Sports Experts v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN SUMMITS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark SEVEN SUMMITS — Earlier Community figurative mark Seven — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

16

2012/C 200/33

Case T-317/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Vakalis v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Calculation of years of pensionable service — General implementing provisions — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of the right to be heard — Equal treatment)

16

2012/C 200/34

Case T-314/11: Order of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Fortress Participations v OHIM — FIG and Fortress Investment Group (FORTRESS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)

16

2012/C 200/35

Case T-315/11: Order of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Fortress Participations v OHIM — FIG and Fortress Investment Group (FORTRESS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)

17

2012/C 200/36

Case T-183/12: Action brought on 25 April 2012 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaiki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis v European Police Office (Europol)

17

2012/C 200/37

Case T-184/12: Action brought on 26 April 2012 — Moonich Produktkonzepte & Realisierung v OHIM — Thermofilm Australia (HEATSTRIP)

18

2012/C 200/38

Case T-186/12: Action brought on 26 April 2012 — Verus v OHIM — Maquet (LUCEA LED)

18

2012/C 200/39

Case T-198/12: Action brought on 14 May 2012 — Germany v Commission

19

2012/C 200/40

Case T-213/12: Action brought on 23 May 2012 — Elitaliana v Eulex Kosovo and Starlite Aviation Operations

20

2012/C 200/41

Case T-571/08 RENV: Order of the General Court of 10 May 2012 — Germany v Commission

20

2012/C 200/42

Case T-211/11: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission

20

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2012/C 200/43

Case F-43/12: Action brought on 30 March 2012 — ZZ v EIGE

21

2012/C 200/44

Case F-45/12: Action brought on 10th April 2012 — ZZ v Commission

21

2012/C 200/45

Case F-52/12: Action brought on 7 May 2012 — ZZ v European Parliament

22

2012/C 200/46

Case F-53/12: Action brought on 7 May 2012 — ZZ and Others v European Economic and Social Committee

22

2012/C 200/47

Case F-55/12: Action brought on 22 May 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v European Commission

23

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN