alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 236

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Correcting the Enrollment of H.R. 1180.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 1180), to amend the Social Security Act to expand the

4 availability of health care coverage for working individuals

5 with disabilities, to establish a Ticket to Work and Self-
2

HCON 236 RDS

1 Sufficiency Program in the Social Security Administration

2 to provide such individuals with meaningful opportunities

3 to work, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House

4 of Representative shall make the following correction:

5 Strike section 408 and insert the following:

6 ‘‘SEC. 408. CLIMATE DATABASE MODERNIZATION.

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Na8 tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall ini9 tiate a new competitive contract procurement for its multi10 year program for key entry of valuable climate records,

11 archive services, and database development in accordance

12 with existing Federal procurement laws and regulations.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
# Official Journal C 287A/28 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 287A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6528 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 287A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6528 July 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 287 A/01 | Vacancy notice CONS/AD/180/22 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2022/C 287 A/01

Vacancy notice CONS/AD/180/22

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Before the Second Division,

March 16, 1961

No. 65299.

#### The Emporium Capwell Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 301603-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

Centigram Communications Corporation
Statement of Computation of Net Income Per Share
(In thousands, except per share data--unaudited)

                                                       Quarter Ended
                                                 February  1,  January 27,
                                                    1997           1996
                                                  -------------------------
Net income                                       $      680     $      507
                                                 ----------     ----------
Computation of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding:
    Common stock                                      6,959          6,727
    Stock options                                        27            253
                                                 ----------     ----------
Common and common equivalent shares
used in computing per share amounts                   6,986          6,980

                                                 ----------     ----------

Net income per share                              $      .10     $      .07
                                                 ----------     ----------



-------------------
Fully diluted computation not presented since such amount differs by less than
3% of the net income per share amounts shown above.


                                          13
Case No. 7,693.

#### KENDEPT v. The THEODORE KORNER.

[3 Am. Law Reg. 47.)

District Court, D. Maryland.

1854.

Seamen’s Wages — Jurisdiction under Treaty.

Libel in rem for seaman’s wages.

The libellant [Henry Kendept) was a citizen of Bremen, to which place the barque belonged. The libellant came to this port in another vessel belonging to Bremen, and was transferred from said vessel in this port,'to the barque Theodore Korner, to go a voyage to the Chincha Islands and elsewhere. On the return of the barque to this port, the libellant left her, and filed this libel to recover his wages. The district court (GILES, District Judge) decided that by the terms of the treaty between our government and the Free Hanseatic Towns, this court had no jurisdiction of the case; that the libellant must apply to the consul for Bremen at this port, who is clothed with jurisdiction in all cases of dispute between masters of vessels and seamen, where the parties are citizens of Bremen.

TANEY, Circuit Justice,

affirmed this decree.
Before the Second Division,

September 30, 1960

No. 64604.

#### W. C. Sullivan & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/8830-10345 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Bao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-079
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
# C_2014151EN.01003301.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/33

---

Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)

(Case T-194/14)

2014/C 151/42

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bristol Global Co. Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Bozhinova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bridgestone Corp. (Tokyo, Japan)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 December 2013 given in Case R 916/2013-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 December 2013 given in Case R 916/2013-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative trade mark containing the verbal element ‘AEROSTONE’ for goods in Class 12 — Community trade mark application No 10 066 736

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trademarks registrations of the word marks ‘STONE’ for goods in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37 and ‘BRIDGESTONE’ for goods in Class 12; well-known trade mark and non-registered sign containing verbal element ‘BRIDGESTONE’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) and 8(5) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-51121

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

William Oliver Towery, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:20-CR-342-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent William Oliver Towery has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Towery has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 12, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-51121 Document: 00516892747 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2023
No. 22-51121

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-51121 Document: 00516892747 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/12/2023
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ROBERT ADAM MCGUFFEY, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

JAMES GREGORY COX, DIRECTOR 

OF N.D.O.C., 

Respondent. 

No. 70428 

FILED 

JUN 2 7 2016 

This appeal was docketed in this court on May 20. 2016, 

without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was 

issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice 

further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would 

result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause 

appearing, this appeal is dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

TRACE K LINDEMAN 

BY (StaiL Vb‘n.ou 

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge 

Robert Adam McGuffey 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Elko County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

(0)-1947 Zcor2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        10,567,244
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      35,462
<MORTGAGE>                                      11,432
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  12,063
<CASH>                                       1,456,196
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         681,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,306,960
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                              12,071,378
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,015
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,045,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,306,960
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            204,724
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (7,708)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  33,145
<BENEFITS>                                       1,239
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     27,074
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            16,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,149
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
From: dlaviolette@dynamicsupplysolutions.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Daniel LaViolette

Livonia, MI 48150
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 10.5.2

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                             SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC.
                 1996 NON-QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


A. The Summit Properties Inc. 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

         1. Section 2.7 is hereby amended by deleting said Section in its
entirety and substituting therefor the following:

                  "2.7 Election Period shall mean a period which (a) shall come
         before a related Purchase Period and (b) shall continue until the last
         business day of the Purchase Period."

B. The effective date of this First Amendment shall be January 1, 1997.

C. Except as amended herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     179,999,000
<SECURITIES>                               282,488,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,057,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,208,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           478,126,000
<PP&E>                                      29,567,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,134,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             522,269,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       46,660,000
<BONDS>                                    489,475,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,279,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (27,088,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               522,269,000
<SALES>                                        280,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,724,000
<CGS>                                          146,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,848,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,290,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (30,324,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (30,045,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (279,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (30,324,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Richard F. Welch,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard F. Welch                                                                                                                                        
|Richard F. Welch Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership April 2, 2007