alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 21, 1962

No. 66603.

#### Hensel Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 324410-K, etc.

Protests abandoned February 19, 1962. (Not published.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           AMERICA SERVICE GROUP INC.

                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                QUARTER ENDED                SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   JUNE 30,                       JUNE 30,
                                                           -----------------------        -----------------------
                                                             2001            2000           2001           2000
                                                           --------        -------        --------        -------
<S>                                                        <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>
Net income (loss)                                          $(18,379)       $ 1,815        $(16,041)       $ 3,510

Preferred stock dividends                                        --           (161)           (163)          (324)
                                                           --------        -------        --------        -------

Numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share -
   income (loss) attributable to common stock
   holders                                                 $(18,379)       $ 1,654        $(16,204)       $ 3,186
                                                           ========        =======        ========        =======

Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share -
   weighted average shares                                    5,420          3,737           5,153          3,732

Effect of dilutive securities                                    --          1,773              --          1,696
                                                           --------        -------        --------        -------

Weighted average common shares outstanding -
diluted                                                       5,420          5,510           5,153          5,428
                                                           ========        =======        ========        =======

Basic earnings (loss) per share                            $  (3.39)       $  0.44        $  (3.14)       $  0.85
                                                           ========        =======        ========        =======
Diluted earnings (loss) per share                          $  (3.39)       $  0.33        $  (3.14)       $  0.65
                                                           ========        =======        ========        =======
</TABLE>


                                       14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE IS A RESTATEMENT OF A PREVIOUSLY FILED SCHEDULE TO DISCLOSE AND
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE AS NOW REQUIRED BY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS NO. 128. THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 1997 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS END MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,387
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    948,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          21,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,081,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        573,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                     287,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,081,705
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               838,294
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  679,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,367
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,285)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M Clinebell, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (the Act), that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                         
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|Dated: February 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Clinebell
|                         |  | Kenneth M. Clinebell    
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer 



46
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         475,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,405,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                   273,000
<INVENTORY>                                    220,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,200,956
<PP&E>                                         513,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                 878,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,220,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,932,951
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    250,000
<COMMON>                                     8,493,270
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,659,407)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,220,445
<SALES>                                     21,623,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,623,092
<CGS>                                       17,316,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,355,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               561,424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             477,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,049,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,610,938)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,623,595)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 9

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We hereby consent to the inclusion in an exhibit in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Baja Mining Corp. of our report dated March 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in this Annual Report. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under File No. 333-165352 of our report referred to above. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Chartered AccountantsVancouver, British Columbia 
March 29, 2010


---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M Clinebell, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (the Act), that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                         
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Clinebell
|                         |  | Kenneth M. Clinebell    
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer 



44
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

mnlteb ~tate~ (!Court of §ppeaI~ 

for tbe jf eberaI (!Circuit 

MICHAEL S. POWELL, 

Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, 

v. 

THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

2010-1409, -1416 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in case no. 07-CV-B0435, 

Judge Daniel T.K. Hurley. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Michael S. Powell moves without opposition to withdraw Alexander D. Brown as principal counsel and to 

substitute Donald R. Dunner. The Home Depot U.S.A., 

Inc. moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of 

time, until October 30, 2010, to file its principal brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 
POWELL v. HOME DEPOT 

The motions are granted. 

SEP 21 2010 

Date 

cc: Alexander D. Brown, Esq. 

s21 

Donald R. Dunner, Esq. 

George M. Sirilla, Esq. 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

2 

u.s. eouJ~~~PEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

SEP 21 2010 

JAN HORBALY 

ClERK
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

HEARING, ETC. 

Case No. 06-5379 1 

Karol A. Whealdon-Andrews 

Anderson, Burns & Hostnik 

6915 Lakewood Drive West, Suite A-1 

Tacoma, WA 98467 

253/475-4200 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

WILLIAM LIPE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RAY 

LORTON; and DOES 1 through 10, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C06-5379KLS 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING MOTION AND FILING 

OF ANSWER 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties by and through their attorneys of 

record that the motion of Defendant calendared for December 8, 2006 be continued to December 22, 

2006 and that the time for Defendant to answer is extended pending the motion hearing. 

Case 3:06-cv-05379-BHS Document 18 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

HEARING, ETC. 

Case No. 06-5379 2 

Karol A. Whealdon-Andrews 

Anderson, Burns & Hostnik 

6915 Lakewood Drive West, Suite A-1 

Tacoma, WA 98467 

253/475-4200 

\\\LA - 090334/009784 - 268352 v1 

ORDER 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

 That the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is continued to December 22, 2006 and 

that Defendants’ obligation to file an Answer is extended pending the hearing on Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss. 

 Done this 27th day of Novmeber, 2006 

 _/s/ Franklin D Burgess ________ 

 The Honorable Franklin D. Burgess 

 Presented by: 

 

 /s/ Karol A. Whealdon-Andrews

Karol A. Whealdon-Andrews, WSBA # 28976 

Anderson, Burns & Hostnik 

6915 Lakewood Drive West, Suite A-1 

Tacoma, WA 98467 

(253) 475-4200 

Karol@ABH-law.com

Counsel for William Lipe, Plaintiff 

/s/Patricia D. Gugin____________

PATRICIA D. GUGIN, PABA#54927 

Assistant United States Attorney 

1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 

Tacoma, WA 98402-4305 

Tel. (253)428-3832 

Fax (253)428-3826 

Pat.gugin@usdoj.gov 

Counsel for USA, Defendant 

Case 3:06-cv-05379-BHS Document 18 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

June 1, 1967

(Note: The following protest was decided by a special second division consisting of Kao, Ford, and Landis, Judges.)

No. P67/181.

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 65/9727 (Houston).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of disc tumbler padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1575

SAM WRIGHT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United

States, in her official capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-97-312-A)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 10, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sam Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

civil action in which he sought injunctive relief. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error in the district court's

conclusion that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Appellant's

suit against the Attorney General in her official capacity is, in

effect, a suit against the United States. See Hawaii v. Gordon, 373

U.S. 57, 58 (1963). The United States, however, is immune from

suit, unless there has been an express and unequivocal waiver of

sovereign immunity. See Army & Air Force Exch. Serv. v. Sheehan,

456 U.S. 728, 734 (1982). Because Appellant failed to establish

that the United States waived sovereign immunity, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WTC
INDUSTRIES, INC. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF
MARCH 31, 2000 AND 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  606,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,000
<INVENTORY>                                    270,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               910,634
<PP&E>                                       1,324,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                 725,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,514,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,214,032
<BONDS>                                      5,465,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,270
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,312,095)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,514,320
<SALES>                                      1,186,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,186,153
<CGS>                                          848,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  592,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (316,752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (316,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (316,752)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.25)



</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000402 01-SEP-2016 10:05 AM
SCWC-15-0000402 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. RACHEL VIAMOANA UI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000402; CASE NO. 3DTA-11-02996) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Rachel Viamoana Ui’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 20, 2016, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, September 1, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Before the Second Division,

November 28, 1962

No. 67220.

protests 60/22388, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Enlite Products Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle horns and sirens similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 270

Condemning the racist and anti-Semitic views of the Reverend Al Sharpton

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 2000

Mr. SCARBOROUGH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the racist and anti-Semitic views of the

Reverend Al Sharpton

Whereas the Congress strongly rejects the racist and incendiary actions of the Reverend Al Sharpton;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has referred to members

of the Jewish faith as ‘‘bloodsucking [J]ews’’, and ‘‘Jew

bastards’’;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has referred to members

of the Jewish faith as ‘‘white interlopers’’ and ‘‘diamond

merchants’’;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton was found guilty of defamation by a jury in a New York court arising from the

false accusation that former Assistant District Attorney

Steven Pagones, who is white, raped and assaulted a fifteen year-old black girl;
2

HCON 270 IH

Whereas, to this day, the Reverend Al Sharpton has refused

to accept responsibility and expresses no regret for defaming Mr. Pagones;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton’s vicious verbal anti-Semitic attacks directed at members of the Jewish faith,

and in particular, a Jewish landlord, arising from a simple landlord-tenant dispute with a black tenant, incited

widespread violence, riots, and the murder of five innocent people;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton’s fierce demagoguery incited violence, riots, and murder in the Crown Heights

section of Brooklyn, New York, following the accidental

death of a black pedestrian child hit by the motorcade of

Orthodox Rabbi Menachem Schneerson;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton led a protest in the

Crown Heights neighborhood and marched next to a protester with a sign that read, ‘‘The White Man is the

Devil’’;

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has insulted members of

the Jewish faith by challenging Jews to violence and stating to Jews to ‘‘pin down’’ their yarmulkes; and

Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has practiced the politics

of racial division and made inflammatory remarks against

whites by characterizing the death of Amadou Diallo as

a ‘‘racially motivated police ‘assassination’ ’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—
3

HCON 270 IH

1 (1) condemns the practices of the Reverend Al

2 Sharpton, which seek to divide Americans on the

3 basis of race, ethnicity, and religion;

4 (2) expresses its outrage over the violence that

5 has resulted due to the Reverend Al Sharpton’s in6 cendiary words and actions; and

7 (3) fervently urges elected officials and public

8 servants, who have condoned and legitimized the

9 Reverend Al Sharpton’s incendiary words and ac10 tions, to publicly denounce and condemn such racist

11 and anti-Semitic views.

Æ
# L_2008246EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---