7054 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

required under § 245.11 of this chapter, 

the number of free and reduced price 

applications subject to a second review, 

the number and percentage of reviewed 

applications for which the eligibility 

determination was changed, and a 

summary of the types of changes made. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. Amend § 210.20: 

■ a. In paragraph (a)(8), by removing the 

word ‘‘and’’; 

■ b. In paragraph (a)(9), by removing the 

period and adding ‘‘; and’’ in its place; 

■ c. By adding a new paragraph (a)(10). 

The addition reads as follows: 

§ 210.20 Reporting and recordkeeping. 

(a) * * * 

(10) For each local educational agency 

required to conduct a second review of 

applications under § 245.11 of this 

chapter, the number of free and reduced 

price applications subject to a second 

review, the results of the reviews 

including the number and percentage of 

reviewed applications for which the 

eligibility determination was changed, 

and a summary of the types of changes 

made. 

* * * * * 

PART 245—DETERMINING 

ELIGIBILITY FOR FREE AND 

REDUCED PRICE MEALS AND FREE 

MILK IN SCHOOLS 

■ 4. The authority citation for part 245 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1752, 1758, 1759a, 

1772, 1773, and 1779. 

■ 5. Revise § 245.6(c)(6)(i) as follows: 

§ 245.6 Application, eligibility and 

certification of children for free and reduced 

price meals and free milk. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(6) * * * 

(i) Income applications. The local 

educational agency must notify the 

household of the children’s eligibility 

and provide the eligible children the 

benefits to which they are entitled 

within 10 operating days of receiving 

the application from the household. 

* * * * * 

§§ 245.11 through 245.14 

[Redesignated] 

■ 6. Redesignate §§ 245.11 through 

245.14 as §§ 245.12 through 245.15, 

respectively; 

■ 7. Add a new § 245.11 to read as 

follows: 

§ 245.11 Second review of applications. 

(a) General. On an annual basis not 

later than the end of each school year, 

State agencies must identify local 

educational agencies demonstrating a 

high level of, or risk for, administrative 

error associated with certification 

processes and notify the affected local 

educational agencies that they must 

conduct a second review of applications 

beginning in the following school year. 

The second review of applications must 

be completed prior to notifying the 

household of the eligibility or 

ineligibility of the household for free or 

reduced price meals. 

(b) State agency requirements—(1) 

Selection criteria. Local educational 

agencies subject to a second review 

must include: 

(i) Administrative review certification 

errors. All local educational agencies 

with 10 percent or more of the 

certification/benefit issuances in error, 

as determined by the State agency 

during an administrative review; and 

(ii) State agency discretion. Local 

educational agencies not selected under 

paragraph (b)(1)(i) that are at risk for 

certification error, as determined by the 

State agency. 

(2) Reporting requirement. Beginning 

March 15, 2015, and every March 15 

thereafter, each State agency must 

submit a report, as specified by FNS, 

describing the results of the second 

reviews conducted by each local 

educational agency in their State. The 

report must provide information about 

applications reviewed in each local 

educational agency and include: 

(i) The number of free and reduced 

price applications subject to a second 

review; 

(ii) The number of reviewed 

applications for which the eligibility 

determination was changed; 

(iii) The percentage of reviewed 

applications for which the eligibility 

determination was changed; and 

(iv) A summary of the types of 

changes that were made. 

(3) State agencies must provide 

technical assistance to ameliorate 

certification related problems at local 

educational agencies determined to be 

at risk for certification. 

(c) Local educational agency 

requirements. Beginning July 1, 2014, 

and each July 1 thereafter, local 

educational agencies selected by the 

State agency to conduct a second review 

of applications must ensure that the 

initial eligibility determination for each 

application is reviewed for accuracy 

prior to notifying the household of the 

eligibility or ineligibility of the 

household for free and reduced price 

meals. The second review must be 

conducted by an individual or entity 

who did not make the initial 

determination. This individual or entity 

is not required to be an employee of the 

local educational agency but must be 

trained on how to make application 

determinations. All individuals or 

entities who conduct a second review of 

applications are subject to the 

disclosure requirements set forth in 

§ 245.6(f) through (k). 

(1) Timeframes. The second review of 

initial determinations must be 

completed by the local educational 

agency in a timely manner and must not 

result in a delay in notifying the 

household, as set forth in 

§ 245.6(c)(6)(i). 

(2) Duration of requirement to 

conduct a second review of 

applications. Selected local educational 

agencies must conduct a second review 

of applications annually until the State 

agency determines that local 

educational agency-provided 

documentation provided in accordance 

with paragraph (c)(3) of this section or 

data obtained by the State agency during 

an administrative review, demonstrates 

that no more than 5 percent of reviewed 

applications required a change in 

eligibility determination. 

(3) Reporting requirement. Each local 

educational agency required to conduct 

a second review of applications must 

annually submit to the State agency, on 

a date established by the State agency, 

the following information as of October 

31st: 

(i) The number of free and reduced 

price applications subject to a second 

review; 

(ii) The number of reviewed 

applications for which the eligibility 

determination was changed; 

(iii) The percentage of reviewed 

applications for which the eligibility 

determination was changed; and 

(iv) A summary of the types of 

changes that were made. 

Dated: January 31, 2014. 

Audrey Rowe, 

Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–02556 Filed 2–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0601; Special 

Conditions No. 25–527–SC] 

Special Conditions: Learjet Inc. Model 

LJ–200–1A10; Airplane Fuselage PostCrash Fire Survivability 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 7055 

SUMMARY: These special conditions are 

issued for the Learjet Inc. Model LJ– 

200–1A10 airplane. This airplane will 

have a novel or unusual design feature 

associated with advanced composite 

materials in the construction of its 

fuselage and wings. The applicable 

airworthiness regulations do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards 

for this design feature. These special 

conditions contain the additional safety 

standards that the Administrator 

considers necessary to establish a level 

of safety equivalent to that established 

by the existing airworthiness standards. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alan Sinclair, Airframe/Cabin Safety 

Branch, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2195; 

facsimile 425–227–1320; email 

alan.sinclair@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 9, 2009, Learjet Inc. 

applied for a type certificate for their 

new Model LJ–200–1A10. The Model 

LJ–200–1A10 is a business-class 

airplane with two high-bypass turbine 

engines and interior seating 

configuration for up to 10 passengers. 

The Model LJ–200–1A10 is the first 

airplane manufactured by Learjet Inc. to 

utilize advanced composite materials in 

the construction of its fuselage and 

wings. 

Type Certification Basis 

Under the provisions of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, 

Learjet Inc. must show that the Model 

LJ–200–1A10 meets the applicable 

provisions of part 25, as amended by 

Amendments 25–1 through 25–127. 

If the Administrator finds that the 

applicable airworthiness regulations 

(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards 

for the Model LJ–200–1A10 because of 

a novel or unusual design feature, 

special conditions are prescribed under 

the provisions of § 21.16. 

Special conditions are initially 

applicable to the model for which they 

are issued. Should the type certificate 

for that model be amended later to 

include any other model that 

incorporates the same or similar novel 

or unusual design feature, the special 

conditions would also apply to the other 

model under § 21.101. 

In addition to the applicable 

airworthiness regulations and special 

conditions, the Model LJ–200–1A10 

must comply with the fuel-vent and 

exhaust-emission requirements of 14 

CFR part 34 and the noise certification 

requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the 

FAA must issue a finding of regulatory 

adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92– 

574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’ 

The FAA issues special conditions, as 

defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance 

with § 11.38, and they become part of 

the type-certification basis under 

§ 21.17(a)(2). 

Novel or Unusual Design Features 

The Model LJ–200–1A10 will 

incorporate the following novel or 

unusual design features: 

The Model LJ–200–1A10 is the first 

airplane manufactured by Learjet Inc. to 

utilize advanced composite materials in 

the construction of its fuselage and 

wings. In accordance with § 21.16, 

fuselage structure fabricated from 

monolithic carbon-fiber reinforced 

plastic (CFRP) prepreg material 

(reinforcement fiber pre-impregnated 

with a thermoplastic or thermoset resin 

matrix) constitutes a novel and unusual 

design feature for a large transportcategory airplane certificated under 14 

CFR part 25. 

Discussion 

Existing regulations do not adequately 

ensure that composite structure offers 

passengers the same protection from an 

on-ground, post-crash fire condition as 

would a conventional aluminum 

structure. Learjet is introducing a new 

material that may have different toxicity 

characteristics than those of traditional 

materials. Service experience has shown 

that, in post-crash fires, traditional 

aluminum structural materials emit 

acceptable toxicity levels. Therefore, it 

is necessary to ensure that the material 

being utilized does not reduce the 

survivability of the passengers during a 

post-crash fire, or provide levels of toxic 

fumes that would be lethal or 

incapacitating, preventing evacuation of 

the aircraft following a crash scenario. 

These special conditions are 

necessary to ensure a level of safety 

equivalent to that provided by 14 CFR 

part 25. Regulations applicable to burn 

requirements, including §§ 25.853 and 

25.856(a), remain valid for this airplane 

but do not reflect the threat generated 

from toxic levels of gases produced from 

carbon-fiber/resin system materials 

following a post-crash fire. 

Discussion of Comments 

Notice of proposed special conditions 

no. 25–13–13–SC, for Learjet Inc. Model 

LJ–200–1A10 airplanes, was published 

in the Federal Register on November 5, 

2013 (78 FR 66317). No comments were 

received, and the special conditions are 

adopted as proposed. 

Applicability 

As discussed above, these special 

conditions are applicable to the Model 

LJ–200–1A10. Should Learjet Inc. apply 

at a later date for a change to the type 

certificate to include another airplane 

model incorporating the same novel or 

unusual design feature, the special 

conditions would apply to that model as 

well. 

Conclusion 

This action affects only certain novel 

or unusual design features on one model 

of airplanes. It is not a rule of general 

applicability. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the following special 

conditions are issued as part of the type 

certification basis for Learjet Inc. Model 

LJ–200–1A10 airplanes. 

The Learjet Model LJ–200–1A10 must 

show that toxic levels of gases produced 

from the composite-material system are 

in no way an additional threat to the 

passengers and their ability to evacuate 

when compared to an aluminumconstructed aircraft. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

31, 2014. 

John P. Piccola, Jr., 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–02495 Filed 2–5–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0950; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AGL–34] 

Amendment of Class D and Class E 

Airspace; Grand Forks, ND 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment, correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects the 

geographic coordinates and adds the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES