alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

March 29, 1962

No. 66630.

#### Casavan Carrara Marble Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 221780-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise, manufactured by S.A.R.I.M., consist of opal glass tile or tiling, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 13,001.

#### SMITH v. ALLYN.

[See Case No. 13.005.]
No. 58319.

protests 207863-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Getz Bros. & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Seaspan Corporation:

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-151329) on Form F-3D and registration statement (No. 333-168938) on Form F-3 of Seaspan Corporation of our reports (1) dated March 30, 2011, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Seaspan Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and (2) dated March 30, 2011, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010
annual report on Form 20-F of Seaspan Corporation.



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP     
|                 
|Vancouver, Canada
|March 30, 2011
**Exhibit 23.2**

** **

**FORREST A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC.**

 

INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

5310 HARVEST HILL ROAD, SUITE 275

DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 - 5805

(972) 788-1110  Telefax 991-3160

E-Mail:  forgarb@forgarb.com

 

March 31, 2011

 

Reef Global Energy VI, L.P.

1901 N. Central Expy Suite 300

Richardson TX 75080

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

 

Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to the use of our name, to references to our name, and to the inclusion of information taken from our “Estimated Reserves and Future Net Revenue as of January 1, 2011 Attributable to Interests Owned By Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. In Certain Properties Located in Louisiana, New Mexico, and Texas”, under the section “Item 2 Properties — Proved Crude Oil and Natural Gas Reserves”. We also consent to the inclusion of our letter report dated February 15, 2011 and summary reserve information in the Annual report on Form 10-K of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. as Exhibit 99.1.

 

 
|   | Yours   truly,                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                   |
|   | /s/   Forrest A. Garb & Associates, Inc. |
|   | Forrest   A. Garb & Associates, Inc.     |
|   | Texas   Registered Engineering Firm F-629              |
|   |                                                   |
|   | /s/   W. D. Harris III                                 |
|   | W.   D. Harris III                                     |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer                              |
|   | Forrest   A. Garb & Associates, Inc.     |

 

----
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to incorporate by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-156493) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration Nos. 333-148386, 333-148390, 333-149689, 333-159390 and
333-160249) of our report dated March 3, 2010 relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule and effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of AgFeed Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) which appear
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December, 31
2009.




Goldman
Parks Kurland Mohidin LLP


Encino,
California


March 5,
2010
Advisory Committee on Aviation

Consumer Protection Russell Hubbard, American Airlines Aileen Cronin, Alaska Airlines Kali Wilson - Beyah , Delta Airlines Date: May 21, 2013

# Regulatory Landscape

# Airline Industry Regulation

• DOT

– Advertising and Marketing rules


### • FAA

– Flight operations, safety, maintenance


### • TSA

– Secure Flight


### • CBP

– Advance Passenger Information System (APIS)

# Legal Privacy Framework

• Financial

– Fair Credit Reporting Act, GLBA, SOX, etc.
• Medical

– HIPAA, HITECH, etc. • Telecommunications & Marketing

– TCPA, TSR • Online Activities

– CAN SPAM, COPPA, FRCA, etc. • International

– EU Privacy Directive, PIPEDA, etc. • Other

– PCI, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, etc.

# What Information is 

# Collected and by Whom?

# Data Collected by Airlines

• Full Name
• Date of Birth
• Redress Number
• Gender
• County of Citizenship
• Passport Number • Address/email
• Payment card
• Phone
• Loyalty Program Number
• Known Traveler ID
• IP Address
• Flight Information
• Meal preference

# Others Who Collect Data

• Air Carrier Web Sites and Call Centers

• Brick and Mortar Travel Agencies

• Online Travel Agencies

– e.g. Expedia, Orbitz , etc.


### • Metasearch Engines

– e.g. Kayak.com, Fly.com


### • General Search Engines

– e.g. Google, Bing

# Data Shared with Third Parties

• TSA

• CBP

• DHS

• Business Partners/Vendors

– Credit card processors, partner airline, wheelchair vendors, etc.


### • GDS

# Emerging Travel Data Uses

• Google

– Targeted ads based on Gmail scanning

– Cross
- platform sharing
• “Google Now” automatic digital boarding passes 

### • Mileage Account Aggregators

– AwardWallet , MilePort, MileWise and Superfly


### • “Big Data” entrants in travel

– Hopper and Boxever


### • The Data Exchange

– “currently we are actively trading data in the Corporate Travel sector” email 4/22/13

# Privacy & Security

# Privacy

• Generally Accepted Privacy Principles:

– Management

– Notice

– Choice & Consent

– Collection

– Use, Retention, and Disposal

– Access

– Disclosure to Third Parties

– Security for Privacy

– Quality

– Monitoring and Enforcement

# Technical Standards & Frameworks

• NIST

• COBIT

• PCI
- DSS

• ISO 27001 and 27002

• SSAE 16, SOC Type 1 & 2

# Security

• Encryption
• Vulnerability Management
• Patch Management
• PEN testing
• User provisioning
• Audits
• System Harding
• Monitoring & Logging
• Etc.
**1997-  milk_production_12.15.97milk_production_11.14.97milk_production_10.15.97milk_production_09.15.97milk_production_08.14.97milk_production_07.15.97milk_production_06.13.97milk_production_05.15.97milk_production_04.15.97milk_production_03.14.97milk_production_02.14.97milk_production_01.15.97

**
Opinion issued March 8, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00018
- CR

——————————— IN RE ALBERT VINCENT THOMAS , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Albert Vincent Thomas, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court compel the trial court to “Grant Writ of Habeas Corpus action and to make a fair ruling on the Designation of Issues motion filed on Oct 19,
2015 as in rea sonable amount of time.” * We deny the petition.

* The underlying case is State of Texas v. Albert Vincent Thomas , cause number 1145134

- B, in the 263rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Wallace presiding.2 PER CURIUM
Panel consists of Justice s Jennings, Massengale and Huddle

. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
2'- g** J-

-fS !■--.

.^2^

r.

'*fs-~

?s

As i' ,£. ,Jf
/7-

/WZ^e£r/&k

'/y 7) /*+*, c- <■ 3*~ S--J

336o /73
/•

J. //i

t*

7>

f. f*i«,r

/J. &>,„,- */ J*

24 St* 3s r* &■
*./

jr

/- f~ -J

,/

,M

IS*

t, ••

*■>

rw

fir**

//r

■.

:■ j-

"3

r>. ■*,

.■

.■•?

/• '-» -Y

,-/

r:

«. a.

fy r,

//

?.

■-

-.

,1,4*,

,~>

*~& s'

r.r /•<

-. t i* -/

/-• ^"//.

/-" ,->•

f.

J>j* tr

<■

'j- i>i s-

'- ■' '-. //--

x/ '. . ,

<~
AS

Z~r'

<:<■/

7-0
2> '-~

^&

-X

(O
/■/*>*,£„ r*cr' fttjcr,Pe. y-o

6/

(3)
.€ ■'C. r<.-

lT* "f s*

(I

/x

(VJ
•■".; -*■

..."

3000
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 205

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring the heroic efforts of the Air National Guard’s 109th Airlift Wing and its rescue of Dr.

Jerri Nielsen from the South Pole.

Whereas the 109th Airlift Wing of the Air National Guard

is based at Stratton Air National Guard Base in Glenville, New York;

Whereas the 109th was called upon by the United States

Antarctic Program to undertake a medical evacuation

mission to the South Pole to rescue Dr. Jerri Nielsen, a

physician who diagnosed herself with breast cancer;
2

HCON 205 RFS

Whereas the 109th is the only unit in the world trained and

equipped to attempt such a mission;

Whereas the 10 crew members were pilot Maj. George R.

McAllister Jr., senior mission commander Col. Marion G.

Pritchard, co-pilot Maj. David Koltermann, navigator Lt.

Col. Bryan M. Fennessy, engineer Ch. M. Sgt. Michael

T. Cristiano, loadmasters Sr. M. Sgt. Kurt A. Garrison

and T. Sgt. David M. Vesper, flight nurse Maj. Kimberly

Terpening, and medical technicians Ch. M. Sgt. Michael

Casatelli and M. Sgt. Kelly McDowell;

Whereas the crew departed Stratton Air Base for McMurdo

Station in Antarctica via Christchurch, New Zealand, on

October 6, 1999;

Whereas on October 15, 1999, Aircraft No. 096 departed

McMurdo for the South Pole, where the temperature was

approximately –53 degrees Celsius;

Whereas Major McAllister piloted a 130,000 pound LC–130

Hercules cargo plane equipped with Teflon-coated skis to

a safe landing on an icy runway with visibility barely

above minimums established for safe operations;

Whereas less than 25 minutes later, following an emotional

goodbye and brief medical evaluation, Dr. Nielsen and

the crew headed back to McMurdo Station;

Whereas the mission lasted 9 days and covered 11,410 nautical miles; and

Whereas Major McAllister became the first person ever to

land on a polar ice cap at this time of year: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes and honors the
3

HCON 205 RFS

1 crew of the Air National Guard’s 109th Airlift Wing for

2 its heroic efforts in rescuing Dr. Jerri Nielsen from the

3 South Pole.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Washington, DC 20551

August 9, 2018

Ms. Linda Andrews

Senior Vice President & Controller

CB Financial Services, Inc.

100 North Market Street

Carmichaels, Pennsylvania 15320

Dear Ms. Andrews:

This letter responds to the request from CB Financial Services, Inc. (“CBFS”),

Carmichaels, Pennsylvania, for an extension oftime to file the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP financial

reports until December 31, 2018. CBFS recently crossed the threshold of $1 billion in total

consolidated assets and, without an extension, would be required to file the FR Y-9C and

FR Y-9LP financial reports on August 9 and August 14, respectively.

CBFS requested additional time to file the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP reports due to

the burden associated with filing these reports. CBFS has represented that, if an extension is

granted, it will continue to file the FR Y-9SP financial report during the extension period.

Acting pursuant to authority delegated by the Board and having considered all

relevant facts, I have approved CBFS’s request for an extension oftime. Accordingly, CBFS is

granted an extension oftime, until December 31,2018, to file the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP

financial reports. This action is based on all the facts ofrecord, including the information

discussed above, and the representations in your submissions. Any material change in those

facts or representations could affect this approval and should be communicated promptly to

Board staff.
Please contact Kevin Tran, Division of Supervision and Regulation, at (202) 452-

2309, if you have any questions.

Very truly yours,

Ann Misback

Secretary ofthe Board

cc: Ronald Staley, Senior Financial Analyst

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Exhibit 31  Certification  I, Vincent Verdiramo , certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Serino 4, Ltd. (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) (Not required) (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: September 13, 2006   /s/ Vincent Verdiramo _______________________ Principal Executive Officer
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 211

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the strong support of the Congress for

the recently concluded elections in the Republicof India and urging the President to travel toIndia.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 211

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Republic of India is a longstanding parliamentary democracy where citizens may freely change their

government;

Whereas India has a thriving multiparty system where a

broad spectrum of political views are represented;

Whereas India recently conducted a successful round of elections, involving over 650,000,000 registered voters and
2

•HCON 211 EH

resulting in a 60 percent voter turnout and re-election of

Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee;

Whereas India and the United States share a special relationship as the world’s most populous democracy and the

world’s oldest democracy, respectively, and have a shared

commitment to upholding the will of the people and the

rule of law;

Whereas the President has expressed his continued desire to

travel to South Asia; and

Whereas India continues to be a shining example of democracy for all of Asia to follow: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of

4 India on the successful conclusion of their recent na5 tional elections;

6 (2) congratulates Prime Minister Atal Bihari

7 Vajpayee on his re-election;

8 (3) calls on the President to travel to India as

9 part of any trip to South Asia; and
3

•HCON 211 EH

1 (4) urges the President to broaden our special

2 relationship with India into a strategic partnership.

Passed the House of Representatives November 16,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 66132.

#### Dr. Hannelore Lehnhoff *v.*United States,

protest 60/20930 (New York).

*335Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 12 pairs of ear clips, item 6121 on the invoice, were duly abandoned under section 506 and destroyed under customs supervision, the collector was directed to make allowance therefor on reliquidation.
(Reap. Dec. 10591)

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 7107.

(Decided October 7, 1963)

*Bur ties, Richardson & Colburn*for tbe plaintiff.

*J ohm, W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to those items on the invoice marked “A” or “B” and initialed JTC (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner John T. Clifford *399(Examiner’s Name) on the invoice covered by the above-entitled appeal for re-appraisement.

> 2. That as so limited, the merchandise and the issues here involved are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United, States*v. *GitTcm Go.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 3. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse prior to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

> 4. At the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for exportation to the United States to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, such prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were as follows:

> (a) With regard to those items marked “A”, the appraised values less the proportionate part of the items marked “AA” in green ink by the Examiner.

> (b) With regard to the items marked “B”,'the appraised values less the proportionate part of the items marked “AA” and “BB” in green ink by the Examiner.

> 5. That on or about the said time of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers for home consumption in the country of exportation.

> 6. That the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement may he submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and consistent with the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the invoice items marked “A” and initialed “JTC” is the appraised value, less the proportionate part of the items marked “AA” in green ink, and for the invoice items marked “B” and initialed “JTC” is the appraised value, less the proportionate part of the items marked “AA” and “BB” in green ink.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for appraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the High Court of Justice, The Person Appointed by the Lord Chancellor under Section 76 of the Trade Marks Act 1994, on Appeal from the Registrar of Trade Marks, by order of that court dated 26 May 2004, in the case of Elizabeth Emanuel and Continental Shelf 128 Ltd

(Case C-259/04)

(2004/C 217/26)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by an order of the High Court of Justice, The Person Appointed by the Lord Chancellor under Section 76 of the Trade Marks Act 1994, on Appeal from the Registrar of Trade Marks, dated 26 May 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 16 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Elizabeth Emanuel and Continental Shelf 128 Limited on the following questions:

ARTICLE 3.1 (g) OF COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 89/104 (1)

ARTICLE 12.2 (b) OF COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 89/104

----

(1)  First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks. OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 1-7.

----
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

79–011 2009

111th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 111–57 

CONTINUATION OF A WAIVER AUTHORITY WITH 

RESPECT TO THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR 

LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS 

THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

TRANSMITTING

A COPY OF PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION NO. 2009–22, WAIVING 

THE APPLICATION OF SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 402 

OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 WITH RESPECT TO THE REPUBLIC 

OF BELARUS WILL SUBSTANTIALLY PROMOTE THE OBJECTIVES 

OF SECTION 402 

JULY 14, 2009.—Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and 

ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with REPORTS
(3) 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 

Washington, DC, July 2, 2009. 

The Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

DEAR MADAM SPEAKER: On behalf of the Secretary, we are hereby transmitting ‘‘Presidential Determination under Section 

402(c)(2)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974—Republic of Belarus.’’ 

We hope that this information will be helpful to you and other 

Members of Congress. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can 

be of further assistance. 

Sincerely, 

MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ

(for Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs). 

Enclosure: As stated. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with REPORTS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with REPORTS
(5) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, July 1, 2009. 

[Presidential Determination No. 2009–22] 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State. 

Subject: Presidential Determination under Section 402(c)(2)(A) of 

the Trade Act of 1974—Republic of Belarus. 

Pursuant to section 402(c)(2)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (Public 

Law 93–618), as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), I determine that a waiver by 

Executive Order of the application of subsections (a) and (b) of section 402 of the Act with respect to Belarus will substantially promote the objectives of section 402. 

You are authorized and directed to transmit this determination 

to the Congress and to publish it in the Federal Register. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with REPORTS