alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated October 13, 1995
with respect to the financial statements of Bloomfield Refining Company included
in Giant Industries, Inc.'s current report on Form 8-K, dated October 19, 1995,
and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Denver, Colorado
   November 5, 1997
No. 52794.

#### Chemical Specialties Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 143457-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBIT 5


                                                               November 14, 1997


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: HYPERCOM CORPORATION LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Hypercom Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with its Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") filed under the Securities Act of 1933,
relating to the registration of 5,000,000 shares of its Common Stock, $.001 par
value (the "Shares"), issuable pursuant to the Company's Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the "Plan").

         In that connection,  we are of the opinion that:

         1.       The Company has been duly organized and is validly existing as
                  a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware.

         2.       The Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms
                  of the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid, and
                  nonassessable.

        In rendering this opinion, we have reviewed and relied upon such
documents and records of the Company as we have deemed necessary and have
assumed the following:

                (i)     the genuineness of all signatures and the authenticity
of documents submitted to us as originals, and the conformity to originals of
all documents submitted to us as copies;

                (ii)    the accuracy, completeness, and genuineness of all
representations and certifications, with respect to factual matters, made to us
by officers of the Company and public officials; and

                (iii)   the accuracy and completeness of Company records.

        The opinions expressed herein are limited solely to the laws of the
State of Delaware. We express no opinion on the laws of any other jurisdiction
or principles of conflicts of law and assume no responsibility for the
applicability or effect of any such laws or principles.

        The opinions expressed herein are based upon the law and other matters
in effect on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to revise or
supplement this opinion should such law be changed by legislative action,
judicial decision, or otherwise, or should any facts or other matters upon
which we have relied be changed.

         We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.


                                        7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICA SERVICE GROUP FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             944
<SECURITIES>                                     3,385
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (133)
<INVENTORY>                                        260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,296
<PP&E>                                           3,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,651)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,479
<SALES>                                         83,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,678
<CGS>                                           75,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3,515)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (503)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                       118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,045
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.10

<FN>
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 HAVE BEEN
RESTATED TO REFLECT THE MEDPARTNERS SETTLEMENT. THE RESTATEMENT WAS A
RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN ITEMS REIMBURSED AND DID NOT IMPACT NET INCOME OR
EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Rinde v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 11 Filed 06/02/2006 Page 1 of 4 Doc. 11

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 11 Filed 06/02/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 11 Filed 06/02/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00556-TSZ Document 11 Filed 06/02/2006 Page 4 of 4
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 8, 2021

NO. 03-19-00507-CR

Juan Deltoro, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
 /s/ Veronica A. Lubatkin
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Petitioner,

v.

CAROL PORTER,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5793RJB

ORDER

This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) and local Rules MJR 3 and 4. Petitioner in this

action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Beginning February 22nd, 2006 petitioner began filing letters with this court. (Dkt. # 16, 23,

24, 25, 20) There are several issues raised by his practices.

The court does not conduct business by letter. A request for court action requires a properly

noted motion and proof the motion has been served on opposing counsel. Plaintiff’s letters will

remain in the file but will not be considered by the court.

Petitioner is also filing documents in pencil and the originals of the documents are so light

they will not copy or scan into the system. The clerks office will send petitioner copies of documents

Case 3:05-cv-05793-RJB Document 26 Filed 03/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 2

16 to 24 to give petitioner an idea how difficult it is to decipher lightly written documents when they

are scanned. 

One such document is petitioner’s motion for subpoena. (Dkt. # 17). Not only can the court

not decipher the pleading, counsel has written a letter indicating he cannot respond to the motion

because he can not read it. (Dkt. # 21). The court will not consider the motion as it is not legible. 

Petitioner may re-file the motion in a legible form and serve and note it properly if he wishes the

court to consider his pleading.

In light of this order respondent’s request for additional time to respond to the motion for

subpoena is DENIED AS MOOT. (Dkt. # 21).

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order and the copies of petitioners filings to

petitioner.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05793-RJB Document 26 Filed 03/17/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                             CONSENT OF ACCOUNTANT


        We hereby consent to the use of our report dated August 20, 1999, on the
financial statements of Capri Corp. and Subsidiary for the years ended June 30,
1999 and 1998. Such report is being included in the Registration Statement
(Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-SB) of Capri Corp.



                                                 /s/ Klesman, Halper & Co., P.C.




Palos Heights, Illinois
March 15, 2000
No. 54420.

#### Aladdin Dry Stencil Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 435021-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Scott J. Blechman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Vans, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting.

Date: October 8, 2003

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Scott J. Blechman                     
| |                                           
| | Scott J. Blechman                         
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| | (Principal Financial Officer)             

24
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
J. Coles, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

March 30, 2006

                                           /s/ Michael J. Coles
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Michael J. Coles
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          42,315
<SECURITIES>                                    50,097
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                      1,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,099
<PP&E>                                          14,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,077)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,377
<BONDS>                                         69,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,358
<SALES>                                         77,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,966
<CGS>                                           43,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,632)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,677
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,705)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 280 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 280

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
      Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 280

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On June 2, 2000, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 2000 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District 
of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Connecticut Department of 

79 Elm Street• Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer 

Attachment C 

Public Hearing Attendees 

Robert Silvestri 

PSEG Power Connecticut LLC 

1 Atlantic Street 

Bridgeport, CT 06604 

Steve Guveyan 

Executive Director 

Connecticut Petroleum Council 

44 Capitol Ave., Suite 103-B 

Hartford, CT 06106 

Shawn Konary 

Director, Environmental-East 

NRG Energy 

211 Carnegie Center 

Princeton, NJ 08540 

Department of Energy & Environmental Protection 

Wendy Jacobs 

Merrily Gere 

Dan Vesa 

Connecticut Department of 

ENERGY & !TL, ENVIRONMENTAL 

_.PROTECTION 

79 Elm Street• Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affinnative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer 

Attachment D 

HEARING CERTIFICATION 

This certifies in accordance with the provisions of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 

51.102 that the following actions were taken regarding the proposed amendment or adoption of 

various sections of the air quality regulations: 

1) The public hearing was held on October 9, 2013 as announced in the notice of 

hearing (Attachment A); 

2) In accordance with the notice, materials were available for review at the 

Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and posted on the 

Department's website; 

3) Copies of the notice were mailed electronically to the directors of the air pollution 

control agencies in New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts 

along with a copy to the Director of the Air Management Division of Region I of 

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and 

4) The notice of hearing was published the Connecticut Secretary of the State's 

website on August 21 , 2013 and on the Department of Energy and Environmental 

Protection's website. 

Wendy Jacobs 

Bureau of Air Management 
- -

1, 'f -" :•r " ,, ~""""'~--- ...