alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 368

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Establishing a special task force to recommend an appropriate recognition for the slave laborers who worked on

the construction of the United States Capitol.

Whereas the United States Capitol stands as a symbol of democracy, equality, and freedom to the entire world;

Whereas the year 2000 marks the 200th anniversary of the

opening of this historic structure for the first session of

Congress to be held in the new Capital City;
2

HCON 368 RFS

Whereas slavery was not prohibited throughout the United

States until the ratification of the thirteenth amendment

to the Constitution in 1865;

Whereas previous to that date, African American slave labor

was both legal and common in the District of Columbia

and the adjoining States of Maryland and Virginia;

Whereas public records attest to the fact that African American slave labor was used in the construction of the

United States Capitol;

Whereas public records further attest to the fact that the

five-dollar-per-month payment for that African American

slave labor was made directly to slave owners and not to

the laborer; and

Whereas African Americans made significant contributions

and fought bravely for freedom during the American Revolutionary War: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Speaker of the House of Representa4 tives and the President pro tempore of the Senate

5 shall establish a special task force to study the his6 tory and contributions of these slave laborers in the

7 construction of the United States Capitol; and

8 (2) such special task force shall recommend to

9 the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the

10 President pro tempore of the Senate an appropriate

11 recognition for these slave laborers which could be
3

HCON 368 RFS

1 displayed in a prominent location in the United

2 States Capitol.

Passed the House of Representatives September 12,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
No. 55035.

#### E. C. Carter & Son et al. *v.*United States,

protests 157753-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case No. 8,900.

#### McMAHON v. The PRIMERA.

[N. Y. Times,

Jan. 24, 1855.]

District Court, D. Connecticut.

Jan. 23, 1855.

Maritime Liens — Repairs — Abandonment before Completion.

[Abandonment'of repairs by a contractor before the completion thereof bars recovery for more than a quantum meruit.]

[This was a libel by James McMahon against the brig Primera. A decree was rendered for libelant (unreported). Heard on claimants’ exceptions to the commissioner's report.]

Mr. Byrne, for libelant.

Lapaugh *&*Andrews, for claimants.

INGERSOLL, District Judge.

This case was tried in last October, and a decree rendered in favor of the libelant, with a reference to a commissioner to ascertain and report the amount of damages. The libel is filed to recover for repairs and supplies furnished to the brig. At the time of trial the cjuestion was raised upon what basis the damages should be calculated, it being elaim-ed by the libelant that not only should he be paid for the actual repairs put on the vessel, but also that the profits should be included which he would have made if he had concluded all the work which he had contracted to do. The commissioner was thereupon directed to report the actual value of the repairs, and also to report what would have' been his profits. The commissioner now reports the amount of the repairs at $414.10, and the profits which lie would have made at $1,800; and to this latter item in the report the claimants except. The libelant alleges that this ship, having sailed from this port for Glasgow, and having put back in need of repairs, was placed in his hands by the master to be repaired. He does not allege that any contract was made as to how the work was to be done, but only that he was to do the needful repairs. After he had begun the work some one, who claimed to be agent for the owners, told him not to go on in the work, and intimated that he might have difficulty in collecting his pay for what he had done, and upon this the libelant ceased his work. The claim in the libel is in the nature of a quantum meruit. The libel-ant could have gone on in his work, but he voluntarily discontinued it, and I cannot conceive how he can recover any more than he has actually expended upon the ship. He does not claim profits in his libel. That part of the report, therefore, which allows the profits must be stricken out.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AND

 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF

RAVEN GOLD CORP.

I, Mike Wood, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Raven Gold Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 (the “Report”):

|   | a. | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at April 30, 2009, and the results of the Company’s operations for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2009. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                   |   |   |   |                                     |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| Date:  August 11, 2009 |   |   |   | /s/ Mike Wood                            |
|                   |   |   |   | Mike Wood                                |
|                   |   |   |   | *President, Chief Executive Officer and* |
|                   |   |   |   | *Acting Chief Financial Officer*         |
# Official Journal C 291/1 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 291 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 601 September 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 291

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 601 September 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 291/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 291/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 291/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 291/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2022466EN.01002101.xml

| 7.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/21

---

Joint statement of the European Parliament and the Council in relation to Regulation (EU) 2022/2379, as regards the importance of establishing in all Member States a register held by national competent authorities on the use of plant protection products in agriculture

(2022/C 466/04)

As part of the European Green Deal, the Farm to Fork Strategy and the Biodiversity Strategy highlight the need for a transition to a sustainable food system, in particular by reducing the use and risk of pesticides by 50 % by 2030 and by increasing organic farming and biodiversity-rich landscape features on agricultural land.

Under Regulation (EU) 2022/2379 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), the full collection of data on the use of plant protection products by professional users in an agricultural activity, that is a coverage of 95 % of the use in each Member State, can only be achieved when a legal requirement for professional users of plant protection products to transmit their records in electronic format to national competent authorities is applicable under Union law.

The European Parliament and the Council recognise the importance of introducing such a requirement into Union legislation and commit to working together to that end.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2022/2379of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 on statistics on agricultural input and output, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 617/2008 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1165/2008, (EC) No 543/2009 and (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 96/16/EC (OJ L 315, 7.12.2022, p. 1).

---
---

Exhibit 99.6


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Baja Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Greenslade, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. March 31, 2011
     /s/ John W. GreensladeJohn W. GreensladePresident and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Baja Mining Corp. and will be retained by Baja Mining Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
<PAGE>   1
                     U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                Date of Report (date of earliest event reported)
                                  May 13, 1998




                        PROLOGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


        Arizona                     1-13704                    86-0498857
(State or other jurisdiction      (Commission                (IRS Employer
    of incorporation)             File Number)             Identification No.)



                            2030 East Speedway Blvd.
                              Tucson, Arizona 85719
               (Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


                                 (520) 320-1000
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
<PAGE>   2
Item 4. Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant

On April 29, 1998, the Registrant engaged Arthur Andersen LLP as its principal
accountant to audit the Registrant's financing statements, commencing with its
fiscal year ended March 31, 1998.




SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

PROLOGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.


Dated: May 13, 1998                  By:  /s/James M. Heim
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          James M. Heim
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
ACCEPTED 03-14-00407-CR 6229771 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/27/2015 10:55:02 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
#### Sarah F. Usen *vs.*Charles W. Usen.

York.

Decided February 28, 1940.

*John P. Deering, Maurice Caro,*for plaintiff.

*Jacob H. Berman, Edward J. Berman, John W. Hill,*for defendant.

Appeal and exceptions from rulings and decree of sitting Justice in Equity. The record being insufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this Court to determine the issues raised, the mandate is Appeal sustained without prejudice. Exceptions dismissed without prejudice. Case remanded for further proceedings.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, A. Brian Davis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Neose Technologies, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934(“***Exchange Act***”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant is made known to us by others within the registrant, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared; and          b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      11/9/07  Date /s/ A. Brian Davis  A.Brian Davis
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 351

Recognizing Heroes Plaza in the City of Pueblo, Colorado, as honoring

recipients of the Medal of Honor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 2000

Mr. MCINNIS (for himself and Mr. STUMP) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing Heroes Plaza in the City of Pueblo, Colorado,

as honoring recipients of the Medal of Honor.

Whereas the Medal of Honor was established by Congress in

1862 and is the highest military declaration bestowed by

the Nation;

Whereas the criteria for receiving the Medal of Honor are extraordinarily stringent, requiring that an individual, while

a member of the Armed Forces, have ‘‘distinguish[ed]

himself conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the

risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty’’ while

engaged in combat and that there have been at least two

eyewitnesses to the act;

Whereas fewer than 155 of the approximately 3,500 Americans who have been awarded the Medal of Honor are
2

•HCON 351 IH

alive, including two who are natives of the City of Pueblo,

Colorado;

Whereas the City of Pueblo, Colorado, will be the site for the

September 2000 reunion of living recipients of the Medal

of Honor; and

Whereas during that reunion, a Medal of Honor memorial, to

be known as ‘‘Heroes Plaza’’, will be dedicated: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Heroes Plaza in the City of Pueblo, Col3 orado, is recognized, effective as of the September 2000

4 reunion of living Medal of Honor recipients in that city,

5 as honoring the recipients of the Medal of Honor and hon6 oring their commitment to the United States and to serv7 ing in the Armed Forces with courage, valor, and patriot8 ism.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") of FirstFed Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby each certify that to the best of our knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


\s\ B. K. Goodwin, III                            May 14, 2004
---------------------------------------------     Date
B. K. Goodwin, III, Chief Executive Officer


\s\ Lynn J. Joyce                                 May 14, 2004
---------------------------------------------     Date
Lynn J. Joyce, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information
furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
EXHIBIT23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-143483 and No. 333-147735) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements
(No. 333-147734, No. 333-156341 and No. 333-156338) on Form S-8 of Smart
Balance, Inc and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated March 10, 2010,
with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the periods in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2009 which report appears in the December 31, 2009
annual report on Form 10-K of Smart Balance, Inc. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in these registration
statements.




/s/
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC




March 10,
2010


Denver,
Colorado
(Reap. Dec. 11098)

#### H S Originals, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 75250.

(Decided November 4, 1965)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn for*the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Judge:

The following appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> 1. That the involved merchandise, consisting of costume jewelry from Japan, was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and is not identified on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54165).

> 2. That on or about the date of exportation, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to *666placing tlie merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were as follows:

> Item No. Unit value — Japanese yen

> 31141/1 56.10 each

> 31141/2 80.30 each

> 31141/3 107. 50 each

> 31141/4 133. 50 each

> 31141/5 45.00 each

> 31141/6 56.10 each

> 31141/7 45. 00 each

> 31141/9 45. 50 each

> 31141/10 31. 00 pair

> 31141/11 33.40 pair

> 31141/12 29. 30 pair

> 31141/13 12. 00 pair

> 31141/14 14. 00 pair

> 31141/15 21.00 pair

> 31141/16 47.50 each

> • — plus, with regard to Items 31141/6, 31141/7, 31141/10, 31141/11 and 31141/12, the pro rata portion of the cost of material supplied to the seller, as appraised ($773.90).

> 3. That this appeal may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and that such statutory value therefor is as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.