alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      8.1**

**List        of Significant Subsidiaries**

| **Subsidiary**                                          | **State                          of Jurisdiction or Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Ann                          Tanker Corporation         | Marshall                          Islands                           |
| Chris                          Tanker Corporation       | Marshall                          Islands                           |
| Regal                          Unity Tanker Corporation | Marshall                          Islands                           |
| Cathy                          Tanker Corporation       | Marshall                          Islands                           |
| Sophie                          Corporation             | Marshall                          Islands                           |
| Rebecca                          Corporation            | Marshall                          Islands                           |
| Ania                          Aframax Corporation       | Marshall                          Islands                           |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF WITHDRAWAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

ALFRED NEWBERRY, )

) Case No. C06-0742RSL

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER

FIBERGLASS STRUCTURAL )

ENGINEERING, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. ) 

_______________________________________)

Two of plaintiff’s counsel of record, Geoffrey C. Cross and Eric B. Maughan,

have filed a “Notice of Intent to Withdraw.” Dkt. # 89. Although the notice is not in the form

prescribed by rule (see Local General Rule 2(g)(4)), the Court will consider counsels’ notice as a

request for permission to withdraw. Because plaintiff continues to be represented in this matter,

notice was sent to plaintiff’s remaining counsel, and no objection was filed, the request to

withdraw is hereby GRANTED. 

Dated this 26th date of October, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00742-RSL Document 92 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Duncan G. Perry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 3, 2005 |  | /s/ DUNCAN G. PERRY                              
|                   |  | Duncan G. Perry                                  
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer (Chief Financial Officer)
Comments in Response to NPRM

Docket No.: FAA-2012-0299 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-029-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM),” Airworthiness 

Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review these comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you 

have made your determination, please check the appropriate response, below. Include additional 

information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then include in your name and date in the 

spaces provided, and this return it to the AD directorate focal.)

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the FAA AD Docket that we received from: UPS.

(Please check one.)

X These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or revision 

of this AD.

___ These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional 

regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual FAA-AIR-M-8040.1, page 19, 

paragraph 21.d., FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

_____Bill Ashforth__________________ ____02/28/13____________

Name: Date:
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of China Clean Energy (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-KSB”), I,
      Tai-ming Ou, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              March 12, 2007
            
            /s/
              Tai-ming OuTai-ming OuPresident and Chief Executive
              Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Clean Energy Inc. and will be retained by China Clean Energy Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB
      pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
      of
      the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
      Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
      incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 31

                             DEPOSITOR CERTIFICATION

      Re:   FFMLT Trust 2005-FFA (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through
            Certificates, Series 2005-FFA, issued pursuant to the Pooling and
            Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2005 (the "Pooling and
            Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as
            depositor (the "Depositor"), National City Home Loan Services, Inc.,
            as Servicer (the "Servicer"), Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
            as trustee (the "Trustee"), and Wachovia Bank, National Association,
            as co-trustee (the "Co-Trustee")

I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual
Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement for inclusion in the Reports is included in the Reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in
accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as
disclosed in the Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

            5. The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is
included in the Reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee
and the Servicer.

Date: Date: March 30, 2006

     ------------------------------------------------


By:  /s/ Michelle Gill
     ------------------------------------------------
Name:  Michelle Gill
Title:  Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 191 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 191

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Brooklyn Museum of Art 
should not receive Federal funds unless it closes its exhibit featuring 
                    works of a sacrilegious nature.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 191

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on October 2, 1999, the Brooklyn Museum of Art opened an exhibit 
        entitled ``Sensation: Young British Artists from the Saatchi 
        Collection'';
Whereas this art exhibit features a desecrated image of the Virgin Mary;
Whereas the venerable John Cardinal O'Connor considers the exhibit an attack on 
        the Catholic faith, and is an affront to more than a billion Catholics 
        worldwide;
Whereas the exhibit includes works which are grotesque, immoral, and 
        sacrilegious, such as one that glorifies criminal behavior with a 
        portrait of a convicted child murderer fashioned from small hand prints;
Whereas the Brooklyn Museum of Art's advertisement acknowledges that the exhibit 
        ``may cause shock, vomiting, confusion, panic, euphoria, and anxiety'';
Whereas the Brooklyn Museum of Art refuses to close the exhibit, despite strong 
        public opposition to the show from religious leaders, government 
        officials, and the general population;
Whereas the American taxpayer, through the National Endowment for the Arts and 
        the National Endowment for the Humanities, provides funding to the 
        Brooklyn Museum of Art; and
Whereas the American taxpayer should not be required to subsidize art that 
        desecrates religion and religious beliefs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Brooklyn Museum of Art 
should not receive Federal funds unless it closes its exhibit featuring 
works of a sacrilegious nature.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 4, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
----

|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Exchange Act; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:                                                                                                                            | /s/ H. Kerr Taylor |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Name:      H. Kerr Taylor                                                                                                      |
|   | Title:      Chief Executive Officer of AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth III      Corporation, General Partner of the Company |
|   |                                                                                                                           |
|   | Date:      March 31, 2008                                                                                                      |

----
05/31/2011 17:23 8163293771 FAA ACE 7 PAGE 02/03 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATON 

WASHINGTON D.C. 

10PtR/^T10:\5 

i -0 ^ h 28 

EV THE MATTER OF 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC 

(VD GEAR PINS) 

FAA Docket No. CP10CE009 

DSMNo. FAA-2010-0025 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

COMES now the Federal Aviation AdministratioiL, by and through the Regional Comisel, 

for the Central Region, and hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Initial Decision rendered 

by Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin served May 20, 2011. 

Dated this 31"* day of May, 2011. 

Respectfiilly Submitted, 

A, Lester Haizlip 

Regional Co 

avid Kessler 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106 

ATTORNEY FOR COMPLAINANT 
05/31/2011 17:23 8163293771 FAA ACE 7 PAGE 03/03 

In the Matter of GoJet Airlines, LLC. FAA Docket No. CP10CE0003; DMS FAA-2010-0025 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date sent the Agency's Notice of Appeal, via methods 

listed, to below named addressees: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk AGO 430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

(Original and 1 copy via regular mail and Fax to^^A^' ^ ^ S'l'^'X 

David J. A. Hayes, III, Esq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Trans States Airlines Inc 

11495 Natural Bridge Rd., Suite 303 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

(1 copy via regular mail) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

(1 copy via regular mail) 

Dated this 31" day of May 2011 

David Kessler 

Attorney
**Exhibit
      32**





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Argyle Security Acquisition Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.





Signed
      on
      this 19th day of March, 2007




/s/
      Bob Marbut


Bob
      Marbut


Co-Chief
      Executive Officer





/s/
      Ron Chaimovski


Ron
      Chaimovski


Co-Chief
      Executive Officer
April 16, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF T .M., A CHILD
NO. 14

- 14

- 00948

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights , signed November 26, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified b elow for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
BbfoRE Chief Judge Bao,

June 28, 1966

No. R66/12.

No. R66/13.

No. R66/14.

No. R66/15.

No. R66/16.

#### Lolly Togs, Ltd. *v.*United States, reappraisement R60/22267 (New York). Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Lollytogs, Ltd. *v.*United States, reappraisements R64/21559 and R65/10981 (Los Angeles). Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Lollytogs, Ltd. *v.*United States, reappraisement R65/493 (San Francisco). Lollytogs, Ltd. *v.*United States, reappraisement R65/782 (Portland, Oreg.). Lollytogs, Ltd. *v.*United States, reappraisement R65/9103 (Seattle).

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those in Lollytogs, *Ltd.*v. *United*States, 55 Cust. Ct. 608, Reap. Dec. 11073, the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise (children’s clothing) and that such values are the invoice unit f.o.b. values, net packed, exclusive of any additional charges or commissions.
No. 57081.

protest 137110-K (New York).

#### Ta-Pon Import & Export Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the items in question are the same in all material respects as the buckles which were passed *347upon in *Weyenberg Shoe Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(38 C. C. P. A. 122, C. A. D. 448). On the agreed facts and following the cited ease, the articles in question were held dutiable as follows: (1) The buckles represented on the invoice items “avec barettes á ressorts, chrome” at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as articles, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, and not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer; and (2) the buckles represented by the invoice items “avec barettes á ressorts doré fort,” at 65 percent under said paragraph 397 as gold-plated articles, not specially provided for.
#### Clifford C. Richardson *vs.*Maine Loan and Building Association.

Cumberland.

Decided April 2, 1940.

*Clifford E. McGlauflin,*for plaintiff.

*Leo G. Shesong,*for defendant.

Suit to recover commission for procuring purchaser of real estate. For the same, defendant was also sued by one Sawyer. Both actions, jury waived, were tried together before a Justice of the Superior Court, who found for the defendant in the instant and for Sawyer in his case. Richardson comes up on exceptions to the decision, but they are not properly before us inasmuch as the evidence is not made a part of the bill. *Jones*v. *Jones,*101 Me., 447, 64 A., 815; *Leathers*v. *Stewart,*108 Me., 96, 79 A., 16; *Doylestown Agr. Co.*v. *Brackett, Shaw*& *Lunt Co.,*109 Me., 301, 84 A., 146.

The situation here is to be distinguished from one in which exceptions are taken to a directed verdict. There a question of law is raised *(Rhoda*v. *Drake, Jr.,*125 Me., 509, 131 A., 573), and all of the evidence by necessity becomes a part of the case, even though not mentioned in the bill. *People’s National Bank*v. *Nickerson,*108 Me., 341, 80 A., 849; *Williams*v. *Sweet,*121 Me., 118, 115 A., 895; *Brown*v. *Sanborn,*131 Me., 53, 158 A., 855; *Bryne*v. *Bryne et al.,*135 Me., 330, 196 A., 402.

It may be said, however, that the record (evidence is printed therein although not made a part of the bill) discloses ample, credible evidence to support the finding of the justice below. Exceptions overruled.
I/M PROGRAM        : 1 2000 2002 2 TRC IM240
I/M CUTPOINTS      : 1 RICUTP.D
I/M EFFECTIVENESS  : 0.75 0.75 0.75
I/M MODEL YEARS    : 1 1975 2050
I/M VEHICLES       : 1 22222 11111111 1
I/M STRINGENCY     : 1 20.0
I/M COMPLIANCE     : 1 96.0
I/M WAIVER RATES   : 1 3.0 3.0
I/M EXEMPTION AGE  : 1 25
I/M GRACE PERIOD   : 1 2

I/M PROGRAM        : 2 2003 2050 2 TRC IM240
I/M CUTPOINTS      : 2 RICUTP.D
I/M MODEL YEARS    : 2 1975 1995
I/M VEHICLES       : 2 22222 11111111 1
I/M STRINGENCY     : 2 20.0
I/M COMPLIANCE     : 2 96.0
I/M WAIVER RATES   : 2 3.0 3.0
I/M EXEMPTION AGE  : 2 25
I/M GRACE PERIOD   : 2 2

I/M PROGRAM        : 3 2003 2050 2 TRC EVAP OBD
I/M MODEL YEARS    : 3 1996 2050
I/M VEHICLES       : 3 22222 11111111 1
I/M STRINGENCY     : 3 20.0
I/M COMPLIANCE     : 3 96.0
I/M WAIVER RATES   : 3 3.0 3.0
I/M EXEMPTION AGE  : 3 25
I/M GRACE PERIOD   : 3 2

I/M PROGRAM        : 4 2003 2050 2 TRC OBD I/M 
I/M MODEL YEARS    : 4 1996 2050
I/M VEHICLES       : 4 22222 11111111 1
I/M STRINGENCY     : 4 20.0
I/M COMPLIANCE     : 4 96.0
I/M WAIVER RATES   : 4 3.0 3.0
I/M EXEMPTION AGE  : 4 25
I/M GRACE PERIOD   : 4 2
Exhibi
32.1






CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the annual report of China Clean Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
“Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant
to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to her knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March
31, 2010




By:
            /s/
      Tai-ming OuName:
            Tai-ming
      OuTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
  Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

LARRY LLOYD,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O PAYNE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5365 RJB/KLS

ORDER TO ANSWER

COMPLAINT

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 1, 3 and 4. On October 31, 2006, a Notice of

Appearance was entered in this case on behalf of Defendants Payne, Watkins, Fitzwater, Atkins, and Ione

George. (Dkt. # 13). To date, however, Defendants have not filed an answer to the Complaint.

Accordingly, Defendants are ORDERED to file an Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint within ten (10)

days of the date of this Order.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for Defendants.

DATED this 23rd day of February, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05365-RJB Document 19 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 1