alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert C. Salipante, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keyport Life Insurance Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2003
 
/s/ Robert C. Salipante 
Robert C. Salipante  
President
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10.13

                              CADE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                 INCENTIVE PLAN
                                      1997

                                   J. SANDFORD
                                     R. LUND
                                   E. STEPHENS

The 1997 incentive program will be based on the following performance factors:  
1.  Cade Industries After Tax Earnings, and 2.  Cash Flow From Operations.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Factor                               Weighting Factor                           Incentive %
------                               ----------------                           -----------

<S>                                  <C>                                        <C>
Cade Industries Earnings                   70                                      35%
Cash Flow From Operations                  30                                      15%
</TABLE>

The maximum incentive is fifty percent (50%) of your 1997 total base 
compensation.  The incentive award will be paid both in cash (75%) and Cade 
Industries Stock (25%).  The stock price award level is determined as the price 
on 12/31/96 ($1.31).



    ------------------                      ------------------ 
    T. L. Ruhlman                           J. W. Sandford   
                                                           
                                                           
                                                           
    ------------------                      ------------------ 
    R. A. Lund                              E. B. Stephens   
                                        


Approved By:   _______________________
               Conrad Goodkind, Chairman
               Compensation Committee
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharmChem, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph W. Halligan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002


                                                   /s/ Joseph W. Halligan
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Joseph W. Halligan
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 10, 2014

No. 04-12-00522-CV

Dionisio G. TORRES d/b/a Torres Design & Construction, Torres Design & Construction, Inc., 

and Torres Construction,

Appellants

v.

Leticia HAYNES,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVF001094-D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The appellant’s “Motion for Leave to File Motion for Sanctions and A Reply to 

Appellee’s Response” is GRANTED. The appellant’s motion for sanctions is DENIED.

__________________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## ...

March 5, 2015

Mr. Abel Acosta, Clerk Court ofCriminal Appeals PostOfficeBox 12308 Austin, Texas 78711-2308

Dear**~1r.** Acosta; Re: ?ending Habeas Corpus**A~plication** Trial No. Wll-52654-Y(A)

Enclosed for timely and proper fileind isAP?LICANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIAL COURT'S JANUARY 22, 2015FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BASED ON NEW CASE**L~W** DECIDED BYTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED s·rATES. \ Thank you for presenting this to the Court.

## MOTIO~.M~SSE[D) 

## DATE: 

# -/;5 laY:

# J?

# ·u· Yours Sincerely,

£..t2fll?rA

## b a 

### fl E

### rflAh(iY IJ

### E-=z~·;-;:::-;-"""" Gonzalo Hernandez, #1801383 Polunsky Unit 3872 Fm 350 South Livingston, Texas 77351EX PARTE IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

TRIAL NO. Wll-52654-Y(A)
GONZALO HERNANDEZ § § § § § § §

APPLICANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIAL COURT'S JANUARY 22, 2015 FINDING OF FACT AND-CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BASED ON NEW CASE LAW DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.

COMES NOW, Gonzalo Hernandez, the Ap.p-licant·herein, and timely requests an Extension of Time in which to prepare and file objections to the trial court's finding of fact and conclusions of law. In support thereof, Applicant would show:

I Upon a plea of not guilty, a Dallas Countyj Texasjury found Applicant guilty to theoffenseof Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child. The offensewas.alleged to have occurredon or about**Aug~** ust7, 2010. The samejury sentenced Applicant to 40 years imprisonment. The DallasCourt ofAppeals affirmed the judgement of the trial court on March 21, 2014 in an unpublished opinion. No .Petition for Discretionary Review was prosecuted.
II Applicanthas never beenpreviously convictedof a felonyand is proceeding pro se in the above styled habeas corpus application.
III At the time of Applicant's appeal**he·w~s** unaware of the Supreme Court decision announced inMartinez v Ryan, 

## u.s. 132 s.ct. 1309, 162 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), providing for the assistance of counsel in collateral ineffective assistance of counsel claims that are no longer available on direct appeal.
IV The follow-up case, announced one year later in Trevino v Thaler, 

## u.s. 133 s.ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013), determined thatMartinez applied to Texas cases.



## v Accordingly, Applicant would like the**opport~1ity** to reguest the appointment of counsel in the trial**cou~t** so that counsel
canreview the entire trial proceedings (Applicant had to file his habeas corpus without benefit of reviewing the record) in**su~port** of Applicant's ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims. Wherefor, for these reasons Applicant prays the Honorable Court of Criminal•Appeals will grant Applicant 30 days in which to submit his objections. Respectfully Submitted.**~N?.I}tc** 

### /IE/l!V/[JYIJEZ Gonzalo Hernandez, #1801383 PolunskyUnit 3872 Fm 350 South Livingston, Texas 77351 -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1997 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         256,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,460,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,053
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          82,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,439,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          133,363
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       189,397
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,439,526
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,468
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,338
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,506
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Roderick de Greef, Chief Financial Officer of Cardiac Science, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2003



/s/ RODERICK DE
GREEFRoderick de Greef Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINE

U.S. v. Picazo-Sanchez/CR05-5895FDB - 1

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 428-3800

Judge Franklin D. Burgess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-5895FDB

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER 

v. ) GRANTING STIPULATED 

) MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

PEDRO PICAZO-SANCHEZ, ) FOR FILING OF

) GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION 

Defendant. ) TO MOTIONS TO SEVER )

After consideration of the stipulation by the Government and Defendant Pedro

Picazo-Sanchez’s requesting an extension of the deadline for the Government’s filing of

an opposition to Defendant’s motion to sever defendant (docket number 23). 

//

//

//

Case 3:05-cr-05895-FDB Document 24 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINE

U.S. v. Picazo-Sanchez/CR05-5895FDB - 2

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 428-3800

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulated motion is GRANTED, and the

Government’s deadline for filing the opposition is extended until March 9, 2006.

DATED this 24th day of February, 2006. 

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

JOHN McKAY

United States Attorney

s/ Michael Dion 

MICHAEL DION 

Assistant United States Attorney

s/ Jesse Cantor (per telephonic auth.)

JESSE CANTOR

Attorney for Defendant

Pedro Picazo-Sanchez

Case 3:05-cr-05895-FDB Document 24 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2
III

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 222

To commend Stuart Franklin Balderson.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 30, 1998

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. STEVENS, Mr.

BYRD, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. FORD) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commend Stuart Franklin Balderson.

Whereas Stuart F. Balderson became an employee of the

United States Senate on May 23, 1960, and since that

date has ably and faithfully upheld the high standards

and traditions of the staff of the United States Senate

for a period that included 19 Congresses;

Whereas Stuart F. Balderson has served as Financial Clerk

of the United States Senate from August 1, 1980 to

April 30, 1998;

Whereas Stuart F. Balderson has faithfully discharged the

difficult duties and responsibilities of his position as Financial Clerk of the United States Senate with great

pride, energy, efficiency, dedication, integrity, and professionalism;
2

•SRES 222 ATS

Whereas he has earned the respect, affection, and esteem of

the United States Senate; and

Whereas Stuart F. Balderson will retire from the United

States Senate on April 30, 1998, with 40 years of Government service—38 years with the United States Senate

and 2 years with the United States Navy: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the United States Senate commends

2 Stuart F. Balderson for his exemplary service to the

3 United States Senate and the Nation, and wishes to ex4 press its deep appreciation and gratitude for his long,

5 faithful, and outstanding service.

6 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

7 a copy of this resolution to Stuart F. Balderson.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

GARY FRANK ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON 

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5217FDB

 ORDER TO AMEND

This habeas corpus petition has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 3 and MJR

4. Petitioner seeks federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. # 4). 

Petitioner names only the State of Washington as a respondent. 28 U.S.C. § 2243 indicates that

writs are to be directed “to the person having custody of the person detained”. This person typically

is the superintendent of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated. Failure to name the

petitioner's custodian deprives federal courts of personal jurisdiction. Stanley v. California Supreme

Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994). 

Case 3:06-cv-05217-RBL Document 5 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 2

Robinson v. Quinn Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

Petitioner is ordered to file an amended petition or a motion to change the case caption and

petitioner must name the superintendent of the facility where he is incarcerated. The new petition or

motion must be filed on of before June 2, 2006, or the court will recommend dismissal of this

petition on jurisdictional grounds.

The clerk is ordered to send copies of this order to the petitioner and to note this matter for

the courts June 2, 2006 calendar.

DATED this 4th day of May, 2006. 

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05217-RBL Document 5 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000, AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDING
JUNE 30, 2000 OF HEALTHSTAR CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000877050
<NAME> HEALTHSTAR CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,962,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,025,218
<PP&E>                                           2,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                     128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,047,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          840,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,346
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,203,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,047,659
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               943,650
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,583,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (688,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (688,688)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (688,688)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 11071)

#### Intra-Mar Shipping Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1026877.

(Decided September 27, 1965)

*Brooks*& *Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above has been *606submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tlie respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that tbe merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement 'herein, consists of nylon yam exported from Italy; and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $1.95 per pound net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs 'Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal for reap-praisement herein may be deemed submitted for a decision on the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find and bold that he involved merchandise was entered on or after February 27, 1958; that the involved merchandise was not listed on the final list of articles published in T.D. 51521, effective February 27, 1958, and that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, and T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and I find and hold that such statutory value is $1.95 per pound, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.