alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

ANNA M. MANGIALARDI,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5355JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND

OTHER EXPENSES UNDER

THE EQUAL ACCESS TO

JUSTICE ACT

This matter comes before the court on a stipulated motion for attorney’s fees and other expenses

under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's counsel Teal M. Parham should be awarded

attorney fees in the amount of $3,765.78.00, expenses totaling $53.96, and costs totaling $381.00 pursuant

to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

DATED this 19th day of March, 2007.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05355-JKA Document 22 Filed 03/19/07 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

January 4, 1949

No. 52779.

#### Minami & Posner Imp. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 994233-G and 26251-K (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consists of 8-bu hats known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Caradine Hat Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41529 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERTO EDUARDO AGUILAR-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-442-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roberto Eduardo Aguilar-Vasquez (Aguilar) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for attempted illegal reentry of a deported alien. Aguilar argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional. Aguilar’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Aguilar contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectlyNo. 05-41529 -2- decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Aguilar properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              228839
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        85808
<ALLOWANCES>                                         75000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2723598
<PP&E>                                               32395
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     6939540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               212527
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                           2500
<COMMON>                                            234444
<OTHER-SE>                                         6490069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       6939540
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       141289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    6523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (100585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (100585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (100585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
Form of Lock-Up Agreement

Gentlemen:


     As part of the  sale of the  shares  of  Common  Stock  of XYZ  Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") to the undersigned (the "Holder"), the Holder hereby
represents,  warrants,  covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the Company and
the  holders  of record  (the  "third  party  beneficiaries")  of the  Company's
outstanding  securities,  including the Company's Common Stock,  $.001 par value
(the  "Stock")  at the date  hereof  and  during  the  pendency  of this  letter
agreement  that the Holder will not transfer,  sell,  contract to sell,  devise,
gift, assign, pledge, hypothecate, distribute or grant any option to purchase or
otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, its shares of Stock of the Company
owned  beneficially  or otherwise  by the Holder  except in  connection  with or
following  completion of a merger or  acquisition by the Company and the Company
is no longer  classified as a blank check company as defined in Section  7(b)(3)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

     Any  attempted  sale,  transfer or other  disposition  in violation of this
letter agreement shall be null and void.

     The Holder  further  agrees that the Company (i) will instruct its transfer
agent not to  transfer  such  securities  (ii) may provide a copy of this letter
agreement to the Company's  transfer  agent for the purpose of  instructing  the
Company's transfer agent to place a legend on the certificate(s)  evidencing the
securities subject hereto and disclosing that any transfer,  sale,  contract for
sale, devise,  gift,  assignment,  pledge or hypothecation of such securities is
subject to the terms of this letter agreement and (iii) will issue stop-transfer
instructions  to its transfer agent for the period  contemplated  by this letter
agreement for such securities.

     This letter agreement shall be binding upon the Holder, its agents,  heirs,
successors, assigns and beneficiaries.

     Any waiver by the Company of any of the terms and conditions of this letter
agreement  in any instance  must be in writing and must be duly  executed by the
Company  and the Holder and shall not be deemed or  construed  to be a waiver of
such term or condition for the future, or of any subsequent breach thereof.


<PAGE>


    The Holder  agrees that any breach of this letter  agreement  will cause the
Company and the third party beneficiaries  irreparable damage for which there is
no  adequate  remedy at law. If there is a breach or  threatened  breach of this
letter  agreement by the Holder,  the Holder  hereby agrees that the Company and
the third party  beneficiaries shall be entitled to the issuance of an immediate
injunction  without  notice to restrain  the breach or  threatened  breach.  The
Holder also agrees that the Company and all third party  beneficiaries  shall be
entitled to pursue any other  remedies for such a breach or  threatened  breach,
including a claim for money damages.

THE HOLDER

/s/ Signature of Holder
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 277 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.277
                                          Agreed to May 15, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on 
June 24, 2000, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be 
carried out under this resolution.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ,!



### - i OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D. C.
Locair, Inc., and Brian L. Hall, Rory C. Crews, and Pedro E. Baez, Individually, Violations of49 U.S.C. §41712 and 14 CFRPart 374 Enforcement Proceeding .**~ ~**  .) ,_;.

Served July 1, 2013

Docket OST 2013-0065
JOINT MOTIONFORPOSTPONINGRULE22 PREHEARINGCONFERENCE,LITIGATIONPLANNING MEETING,AND SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED LITIGATIONPLAN
Pursuant to 14 CFR 302.11, the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (Enforcement Office) and Respondents Locair, Inc., (Locair) Brian L. Hall, Rory C. Crews, and Pedro E. Baez hereby submit for approval byYour Honor this motion to postpone the dates for the parties to conduct a Rule 22 Prehearing Conference and a Litigation Planning Meeting and to submitto Your Honor aproposed Litigation Plan. In the Order issued by the U.S. Department ofTransportation, Office of Hearings and signed by Your Honor on June 21, 2013, the parties are required to conduct a Rule 22 Prehearing Conference on August 7, 2013, and to complete a Litigation Planning Meeting and file with Your Honor a proposed Litigation Plan on or before July 31, 2013. Pursuant to 14 CFR 302.417, the Enforcement Office and Respondents have continued their efforts to settle this matter and report that those efforts have almost reached fruition. Respondents have agreed&ppro\al joint m<ltkm proposing to senle this matter

For

JL

# ~ Brian L. UaU 1740 HUIJSllll RrL<it*****Suit~** UH2peJtn 2J10c) SW 164 Htlm(:S\ear:l FLCertificate ofService I certify that on July 1, 2013, I served the Joint Motion for Postponing Rule 22 Prehearing Conference, Litigation Planning Meeting, and Submission ofProposed Litigation Plan by first class mailto: Judge J. E. Sullivan US. AdministrativeLawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Ave., S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Locair, Inc., 1100 Lee Wagner Blvd., Suite 307 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33315 Brian L. Hall: 1740 HudsonBridge Road, Suite 1012 Stockbridge, GA 30281
and by electronic mail to : Brian L. Hall brian@bulldogmarine.biz Rory C. Crew: rorycrewsl @gmail.com Pedro E. Baez pedro@bulldogmarine.biz Samuel Podberesky Assistant General Counsel for

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

# ~~~~ Clereece Kroha Trial Attorney Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings (202) 366-9041
CAUSE NO. 13-14-00402-CV

____________________________________________ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________ RALPH WADE KOOPMANN, ET AL., Cross-Appellants/Plaintiffs, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS, ET AL., Cross-Appellees/Defendants,

____________________________________________ On Appeal from the 24th Judicial District Court of Dewitt County, Texas Trial Cause No. 12-07-22, 354, Hon. Kemper Stephen Williams Presiding

____________________________________________ CROSS-APPELLANTS’ JOINT AMENDED BRIEF

PART 3

____________________________________________ Mike Johanson,#10670400 Ronald B. Walker, #20728300 Todd Taylor, #00785087 W ALKER K EELING , L.L.P. Chris M. Volf, #24033299 120 S. Main, Suite 500 J OHANSON & F AIRLESS , L.L.P. P.O. Box 108 1456 First Colony Boulevard Victoria, Texas 77902 Sugar Land, Texas 77479 (361) 576-6800/(361) 576-6196 Fax (281) 313-5000/(281) 340-5100 Fax Counsel for Cross-Appellants Ralph Wade Koopmann, Karen Marie Koenig, and Lorene H. Koopmann ACCEPTED 13-14-00402-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 12/24/2014 11:57:28 AM DORIAN RAMIREZ

CLERK
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 114

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

as a testimonial to the Nation’s tireless commitment to reuniting America’s missing children with their families, and to honor the memories

of those children who were victims of abduction and murder.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1999

Mr. BOEHLERT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued as a testimonial to the Nation’s tireless

commitment to reuniting America’s missing children with

their families, and to honor the memories of those children who were victims of abduction and murder.

Whereas every 40 seconds a child is reported missing, and

each year in the United States, up to 1,000,000 children

are reported missing;

Whereas the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, was established 15 years ago as the Nation’s resource center and clearinghouse for information on America’s missing children, and issued a national call to action

requesting the participation of every citizen to assist in

the search for the country’s missing youth;
2

•HCON 114 IH

Whereas it is the collective responsibility of all Americans to

better protect the Nation’s children, as well as to assist

in the search for those who are missing; and

Whereas the issuance of a stamp bearing the image of a

missing child, sends a powerful message, at its unveiling

and on each letter with which it is sent; Americans will

not tolerate the victimization of their children, and not

rest until each missing child is reunited with his or her

family: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the

4 United States Postal Service to honor all missing

5 children; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Commission of the

7 United States Postal Service should recommend to

8 the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Star Resource Corp., a Yukon Territory, Canada corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nevada Star Resource Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Star Resource Corp.



Date:  April 13, 2004



/s/ Robert Angrisano

_____________________________________________

Robert Angrisano, Principal Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6514

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JACKIE MCGEORGE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-97-109, CA-99-1578-AM) Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 23, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie McGeorge, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jackie McGeorge seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McGeorge , Nos. CR-97-109; CA-99- 1578-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2000; entered Mar. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
BOARD OF GOVERNORS 

OF'THE 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Patrick S. Antrim, Esq. 

Assistant General Counsel 

Bank of America Corporation 

Legal Department 

101 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, North Carolina 28255 

Dear Mr. Antrim: 

WASHINGTON, O. I:. 20551 

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE 

TO THE BOARD 

March 18, 2010 

On August 20,2007, the Board approved a temporary exemption from section 23A of the 

Federal Reserve Actl to allow Bank of America, N.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, to engage in 

reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing transactions with its affiliated brokerdealer in conjunction with actions the Board took simultaneously to provide insured depository 

institutions with access to term loans at the discount window.2 These activities were intended to 

allow the bank to extend credit to market participants in need of short-term liquidity to finance 

the participants' holdings of certain mortgage loans and asset-backed securities. 

The Board's approval noted that the exemption was temporary and available only as long 

as the special accommodation at the discount window was available. 3 On February 18,2010, the 

Board announced that, in light of the continued improvement in financial markets, the typical 

maximum maturity for primary credit loans at the discount window would be shortened to 

overnight, effective March 18, 2010. In light of this normalization of the term for discount 

window loans, the Board has terminated the temporary section 23A exemption. 

Very truly yours, 

Robert deV. Frierson 

Deputy Secretary of the Board 

cc: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 

I 12 U.S.C. § 371c. 

2 Board letter to Patrick S. Antrim, Esq. (Bank of America Corporation), dated August 20,2007. 

3 Id.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
David P. Southwell, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Sepracor Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
May 7, 2008

| | /s/DAVID P. SOUTHWELLDavid P. Southwell Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks