alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Officer's
        Certificate
 
 BSABS
        2005-HE4, BSABS 2005-HE5, BSABS 2005-HE6
 
 I,
        Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President of EMC Mortgage Corporation, do hereby
        certify to the designated Master Servicer that in respect to the period ending
        November 30, 2005, a review of the activities of EMC Mortgage Corporation
        ("EMC") during the preceding fiscal year or applicable portion thereof and
        it's
        performance under the above referenced Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
        been
        made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based
        on
        such review, EMC has fulfilled **** all
        of
        its obligations under this Agreement
        throughout such year, or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment
        of any
        such obligation, specifying each such default known to such Servicing Officer
        and the nature and status thereof except for such defaults as such officer
        in
        its good faith judgment believe to be immaterial.
 
 
 /s/
        Sue Stepanek
 Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President
 
 2/14 /06
 Date
 
 
 
 
 
 Two
                  MacArthur Ridge 909 Hidden Ridge Drive, Suite 200 Irving, Texas
                  75038Mailing
                  Address: P.O. Box 141358, Irving, Texas
                  75014-1358
No. 57790.

protests 184035-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Jas. B. Draper & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean

content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content *383under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
No. 57504.

#### Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 201575-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 65301.

#### Hap Alzina et al. *v.*United States,

protests 329516-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 19, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 11, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 72 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-6, CP2024-6.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-23022 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES



    -   Medicis, The Dermatology Company

    -   Medicis Dermatologics, Inc.

    -   Dermavest, Inc.

    -   Advanced Pharmaceutical Research

    -   Medicis Acquisition Corporation
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, )

)

v. ) ID#s 1705004684 & 1705004742

)

KORI A. THOMAS

, )

Defendant

. )

Submitted: March 3, 2023

Decided: March 21 , 2023

ORDER

Upon Defendant ’s Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief

- D ENIE D

.

This 21 st day of March , 20 2 3 , upon consideration of the Defendant ’s Pro

Se Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief

, 1 the Commissioner’s Report and

Recommendation that Defendant’s Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief

should be D ENIED

, 2 and the R ecord in this case, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The Court referred this motion to a Superior Court Commissioner

pursuant t o 10 Del

. C . § 512(b) and Super. Ct. Cr. R. 62 for proposed findings of

fact and conclusions of law.

(2) The Commissioner has filed a Report and Recommendation that the

Court deny the Defendant’s Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief.

1 1705004684, D.I. 65

- 69 ; 1705004742, D.I. 44

- 48

. 2 1705004684, D.I. 84; 1705004742, D.I. 61.- 2

-

(3) Neither party has filed an objection to the Commissioner’s Report and

Recommendation.

NOW THEREFORE , after careful and de novo review of the record in this

case , and for the reasons stated in the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation

dated March 3, 2023

, the Court ADOPTS the Commissioner’s Report in its entirety

and Defendant’s Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief is D ENIE D

.

/s/ Jan R. Jurden

Jan R. Jurden, President Judge

Original : Prothonotary

cc: Hon. Janine M. Salomone

Timothy G. Maguire

, Esq., DAG

Natalie S. Woloshin, Esq.

Kori A. Thomas

, pro se
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER - [C06-5147-FDB]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

DAVID LAIL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Civil No. C06-5317-FDB

ORDER FOR EXTENSION

Based upon Stipulation between the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant

shall have an extension to and including October 31, 2006, to file a response to Plaintiff’s opening

brief. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including November 14, 2006, to file

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief.

Case 3:06-cv-05317-FDB Document 14 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER - [C06-5147-FDB]

DATED this 13th day of October, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/ JEFFREY BAIRD

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 MS/901

Seattle, Washington 98104-7075

Telephone: (206) 615-2205

FAX: (206) 615-2531

jeffrey.h.baird@ssa.gov

Case 3:06-cv-05317-FDB Document 14 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Pixelplus Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Hoang Taig Choi as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 30, 2008



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Hoang Taig Choi    
|Name:  |  | Hoang Taig Choi        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



122
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Notice Regarding Board of Directors Meetings

AGENCY: Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace, United 
States Institute of Peace (USIP).

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: USIP announces the next meeting of the Board of Directors.

DATES: Friday, October 20, 2023 (9 a.m.-12:30 p.m.). The next meeting 
of the Board of Directors will be held January 19, 2024.

ADDRESSES: 2301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan O'Hare, 202-429-4144, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1acaea9a0b3a481b4b2a8b1efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f9fbfcf5e6f1d4e1e7fde4baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Open Session--Portions may be closed 
pursuant to subsection (c) of section 552b of title 5, United States 
Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States 
Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.

(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 4605(h)(3))

    Dated: October 11, 2023.
Rebecca Fernandes,
Director of Accounting.
[FR Doc. 2023-22737 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2810-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR INDICTMENT

(Sherry McCarthy, 06-378M)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

-1- (206) 553-1100

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARY ALICE THEILER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SHERRY DEBBIE McCARTHY,

Defendant.

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 06-378M

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR

INDICTMENT

The Court, having reviewed the stipulation by the parties, hereby finds that the

reasons set forth therein for the requested 45 day extension to file an indictment against

the defendant establish that the ends of justice served by granting the extension

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the date on or before which an indictment in this

case must be filed against the defendant shall be extended from August 15, 2006 to

September 29, 2006.

//

//

Case 2:06-mj-00378-JPD Document 13 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR INDICTMENT

(Sherry McCarthy, 06-378M)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

-2- (206) 553-1100

//

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of delay from August 15, 2006 to

September 29, 2006, is excludable time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 through 3164.

DONE this 4th day of August, 2006.

AJames P. Donohue

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/Jay W. Stansell, WSBA# 18752

Attorney for Sherry D. McCarthy

Federal Public Defender

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, WA 98101

(206) 553-1100 voice

(206) 553-0120 facsimile

Jay_Stansell@fd.org email

s/ Jill Otake

Assistant United States Attorney 

Per telephone authorization

Case 2:06-mj-00378-JPD Document 13 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 67656.

#### Gramercy Guild Group, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/3-1152 and 60/11492 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of triangles and curves, composed of acrylic plastic, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 64292, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(c)

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section
1350), the undersigned officers of Mairs and Power Growth Fund, Inc. (the
"Fund") do hereby certify, to the best of each such officer's knowledge, that:

1.   The N-CSR of Mairs and Power Growth Fund, Inc. (the "Report") fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
     Fund.


/s/ George A. Mairs
-----------------------------------------
George A. Mairs, III
President

Date: September 5, 2003


/s/ Lisa J. Hartzell
-----------------------------------------
Lisa J. Hartzell
Treasurer

Date: September 5, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER 1–

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CLIFFORD W. LATTISH,

Plaintiff,

v.

WATERMAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, a

Corporation of New York State,

Defendant.

C06-960Z

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas

S. Zilly, United States District Judge:

(1) The Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s

Negligence and Unseaworthiness Claims, docket no. 42. The Declarations of Drs. Oh and

Massey, Plaintiff’s March 14, 2006 Personal Injury Report, and Ms. Deatra Thompson’s

reports raise genuine issues of material fact on the issue of causation, precluding summary

judgment. See Ribitzki v. Canmar Reading & Bates, Ltd. P’ship, 111 F.3d 658, 664-665 (9th

Cir. 1997) (setting forth the causation standards for a Jones Act negligence claim and an

unseaworthiness claim). 

(2) The Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Strike, docket no. 53. As treating

doctors, Drs. Oh and Massey are not bound by the written expert report requirement. See

FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(2), Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 amends.; Shapardon v. West

Beach Estates, 172 F.R.D. 415, 416 (D. Haw. 1997). The Declarations of Drs. Oh and

Massey are not subject to being stricken as “sham declarations” because the opinions

contained therein are clarifications of, and not contradictory to, the doctors’ prior deposition

testimony. See Kennedy v. Allied Mut. Ins. Co., 952 F.2d 262, 266 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Notwithstanding the Court’s denial of Defendant’s Motion to Strike, the Court ORDERS that

at trial Drs. Oh and Massey shall be permitted to testify on the issue of causation, but only to

the extent that their medical opinions are based on their respective treatments of Mr. Lattish. 

See Arnett v. Ohio Nat’l Life Assurance Corp., Case No. C05-5639-FDB, Order, docket no.

27, at 5 (Oct. 23, 2006). The treating physicians will be prohibited from rendering medical

Case 2:06-cv-00960-TSZ Document 64 Filed 08/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER 2–

opinions based on factors that were not learned in the course of their respective treatment of

the Plaintiff. Id.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of

record.

Filed and entered this 3rd day of August, 2007.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/ Claudia Hawney

By Claudia Hawney

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00960-TSZ Document 64 Filed 08/03/07 Page 2 of 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133720 & (13) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133720 COA: 275600 Jackson CC: 05-001181-FH FRANKIE D. HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant's motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502 (G). The motion to remand
is DENIED.

d0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

                                                           CUSIP NO. 254567 10 0

                           DIRECT III MARKETING, INC.

                   AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 50,000,000 SHARES
                                PR VALUE: $.001


THIS CERTIFIES THAT



IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF


               Shares of Direct III Marketing, Inc. Common Stock

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate
is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the
Registrar.

         Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

Secretary:

President:
Kathleen A. Juhase, Esq. 

Senior Vice President and 

Associate General Counsel 

JPMorgan Chase & Co. 

270 Park Avenue, 40th Floor 

New York, New York 10017 

Dear Ms. Juhase: 

BOARD OF GOVERNORS 

OF'THE 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

WASHINGTON, O. c. 20S51 

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE 

TO THE BOARD 

March 18, 2010 

On August 20,2007, the Board approved a temporary exemption from section 23A of the 

Federal Reserve Actl to allow JPMorgan Chase, National Association, New York, New York, to 

engage in reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing transactions with its affiliated 

broker-dealer in conjunction with actions the Board took simultaneously to provide insured 

depository institutions with access to term loans at the discount window? These activities were 

intended to allow the bank to extend credit to market participants in need of short-term liquidity 

to finance the participants' holdings of certain mortgage loans and asset-backed securities. 

The Board's approval noted that the exemption was temporary and available only as long 

as the special accommodation at the discount window was available.3 On February 18,2010, the 

Board announced that, in light of the continued improvement in financial markets, the typical 

maximum maturity for primary credit loans at the discount window would be shortened to 

overnight, effective March 18,2010. In light of this normalization of the term for discount 

window loans, the Board has terminated the temporary section 23A exemption. 

Very truly yours, 

Robert deV. Frierson 

Deputy Secretary of the Board 

cc: Federal Reserve Bank of New York 

1 12 U.S.C. § 371c. 

2 Board letter to Kathleen A. Iuhase, Esq. (JPMorgan Chase & Co.), dated August 20,2007. 

3 Id.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

March 6, 2018

Mr. Jacob Denney
38944 Otis Allen Road
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540

Dear Mr. Denney:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after
consultation with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has
approved your request pursuant to section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to
become an institution-affiliated party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Company (“State Farm’), Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan holding company
(“SLHC”). This approval is limited to your being an institution-affiliated party of State
Farm, including by working for State Farm or an independently owned agency that sells
State Farm insurance products and products for State Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary,
State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington, Illinois. If you seek to work
for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), or for an independently owned
agency that sells products for another SLHC or BHC, you must obtain the Board’s
approval prior to working for such SLHC, BHC, or agency.

This action is based on all the facts of record and the representations made
by you to the Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented
could result in a different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff.
This action is also based on all commitments provided by you in support of your request.
These commitments are conditions imposed in writing in connection with the Board’s
decision and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. This action
is also conditioned specifically on your receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals
related to your proposal and compliance with any terms and conditions that may be
imposed in connection with such approvals. Additionally, if you are convicted of, or
enter into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust,

1 12 U.S.C. § 1829.


or money laundering in the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC,
BHC, or independently owned agency that sells products for an SLHC or a BHC,
including any agency that sells State Farm and State Farm Bank products.

Sincerely yours,
Vin 6t~_-

Ann E. Misback
Secretary of the Board