alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A89A2067.

#### GAITHER v. BARCLAYSAMERICAN/FINANCIAL OF GEORGIA, INC.

(390 SE2d 97)

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellee-defendant held a purchase money security interest in appellant-plaintiff’s mobile home. After appellant defaulted and allegedly abandoned the mobile home, appellee repossessed it. Appellant subsequently initiated this action, alleging that appellee’s repossession was “wrongful” and seeking both compensatory and punitive damages under a variety of tort theories. After extensive discovery, appellee moved for summary judgment. This motion was denied except as to the issue of appellant’s recovery of punitive damages under OCGA § 51-12-5. Appellant appeals from this grant of partial summary judgment in favor of appellee.

“ ‘Something more than the mere commission of a tort is always *189required for punitive damages. There must be circumstances of aggravation or outrage, such as spite or “malice,” or a fraudulent or evil motive on the part of the defendant, or such a conscious and deliberate disregard of the interests of others that the conduct may be called wilful or wanton. There is general agreement that, because it lacks this element, mere negligence is not enough, even though it is so extreme in degree as to be characterized as “gross,” a term of ill-defined content, which occasionally, in a few jurisdictions, has been stretched to include the element of conscious indifference to consequences, and so to justify punitive damages. Still less, of course, can such damages be charged against one who acts under an innocent mistake in engaging in conduct that nevertheless constitutes a tort. . . .’ [Cit.]” *Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown,*258 Ga. 115, 121-122 (4) (365 SE2d 827) (1988). In support of its motion for summary judgment, appellee produced evidence which was sufficient to pierce the allegations that it or its agents had engaged in such egregious behavior as would authorize a recovery for punitive damages. In opposition, appellant made no showing that appellee or its agents had “heedlessly and unnecessarily committed acts which resulted in damage to [appellant’s] property [or] indiscriminately seized items as to which payments were not then overdue [such as] would be some evidence of conscious indifference to consequences [or] wanton disregard of [appellant’s] rights. . . . [Cit.]” *Whisenhunt v. Allen Parker Co.,*119 Ga. App. 813, 819 (4) (168 SE2d 827) (1969). The evidence, construed most favorably for appellant, shows, at most, the mere commission of a tort. The trial court correctly granted partial summary judgment in favor of appellee as to punitive damages. Compare *Associated Health Systems v. Jones,*185 Ga. App. 798, 802 (2) (366 SE2d 147) (1988).

Decided January 8, 1990.

*Blount, Garcia & Singh, Udai V. Singh,*for appellant.

*Douglas N. Campbell, Laura E. Stevenson,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.*
Before the First Division,

March 26, 1959

No. 62886.

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/8467 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise represented by item 3-7720-9 consists of celluloid reindeer the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 55793, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 232

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2000

Received; referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the safety

and well-being of United States citizens injured while

traveling in Mexico.

Whereas hundreds of United States citizens travel by automobile to Mexico every day;

Whereas United States automobile insurance in not valid in

Mexico and travellers may purchase additional insurance

to cover potential liability or injury while in Mexico;

Whereas in cases where additional insurance is not purchased

and a United States citizen is involved in an automobile

accident, the American will be subject to a bond requirement before being permitted to return to the United

States; and

Whereas in a recent incident, a United States citizen injured

in an automobile accident in Mexico was not transferred

to a United States hospital for 18 hours, even after medical personnel in Mexico recommended his immediate

transfer to the United States for emergency treatment,
2

HCON 232 RFS

until the family posted the bond set by Mexican authorities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that, in

3 order to protect the safety and well-being of United States

4 citizens travelling in Mexico, the President should con5 tinue to negotiate with the Government of Mexico to estab6 lish procedures, including a humanitarian exemption to

7 Mexican bond requirements, to ensure the expedited re8 turn of United States citizens injured in Mexico to the

9 United States for medical treatment, if necessary.

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.224 Mutual Fund Shares (1)  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2016
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
2016   Q4
LineMutual funds; mutual fund shares; liability
	FA653164205
	309.7
	95.7
	24.9
	-35.4
	-59.9
	-24.1
	78.6
	201.6
	-156.6
	1Mutual funds; mutual fund shares; liability
	FA653164205
	309.7
	95.7
	24.9
	-35.4
	-59.9
	-24.1
	78.6
	201.6
	-156.6
	2Households and nonprofit organizations; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA153064205
	241.7
	58.3
	27.2
	102.1
	18.4
	-198.8
	125.4
	214.9
	-32.5
	3Nonfinancial corporate business; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA103064203
	15.2
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	7.4
	4State and local governments, excluding employee retirement funds; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA213064203
	1.0
	2.7
	1.6
	3.5
	3.4
	1.1
	1.2
	3.1
	1.2
	5U.S.-chartered depository institutions; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA763064203
	-0.7
	-0.9
	-1.8
	-3.3
	-1.6
	4.1
	-0.5
	-8.2
	-2.8
	6Credit unions; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA473064205
	-0.2
	-0.1
	-0.1
	0.5
	-1.0
	0.1
	0.1
	-0.4
	-0.1
	7Property-casualty insurance companies; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA513064203
	1.2
	0.7
	-1.2
	0.7
	0.7
	-3.0
	-0.7
	-0.8
	-0.5
	8Life insurance companies; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA543064205
	-33.0
	-29.4
	-54.9
	-38.0
	-19.5
	-57.1
	-60.6
	-39.2
	-62.6
	9Private pension funds; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA573064205
	40.6
	34.2
	22.2
	-49.7
	39.9
	149.8
	14.1
	-32.5
	-42.5
	10State and local government employee retirement funds; mutual fund shares; asset
	FA223064205
	11.3
	15.7
	-7.0
	-20.6
	3.7
	10.5
	-13.6
	-32.0
	7.1
	11Rest of the world; U.S. mutual fund shares; asset
	FA263064203
	32.7
	7.1
	31.4
	-38.0
	-111.4
	62.0
	5.6
	89.4
	-31.3
	12 Back to top
  **NOTES** Shares of open-end investment companies; excludes shares of money market mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
February
7, 2018


 


Todd
Caven, CFO


Regen
BioPharma Inc.


4700
Spring Street, Suite 304


La
Mesa, CA 91942


 


Dear
Todd:


 


The
purpose of this letter is to confirm the following details of our recent phone conversation. This is to confirm our conversation
this morning that Zander is willing and able to pre-pay our June 2018 anniversary license fee early in exchange for a reduced
cost of $90,000 (a $10,000 savings to Zander).


 


The
terms discussed were as follows:


 


		(1)	Pursuant
                                         to Section 3.1.2 of that License Agreement by and between Zander Therapeutics, Inc. and
                                         Regen Biopharma, Inc.(“Agreement”) , Zander is obligated to pay to Regen
                                         an annual non-refundable payment of $100,000 on each anniversary date of the Agreement
                                         (“Annual Anniversary Fee”)



		(2)	Zander,
                                         by making payment of $90,000 on or before February 10, 2018, shall have fully satisfied
                                         its June 2018 Annual Anniversary Fee obligation.



 


Zander
is happy to move forward on this transaction immediately. Please sign below in agreement to these terms and return to me. I will
consummate this transaction as soon as I receive your executed agreement.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/David
Koos


David
Koos


Chairman
& CEO


 


Agreed
to by:


 


/s/Todd
S. Caven


Todd
S. Caven


Chief
Financial Officer


Regen
Biopharma, Inc.
# L_2013210EN.01S00301.xml

| 6.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of J.A.M., a child

, * From the 318 th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM57813

.

No. 11

- 15

- 00096

- CV * June 18, 2015

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has considered the unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal as

moot, which was filed by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas, and

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with

this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismiss ed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,389,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,428,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                   217,387
<INVENTORY>                                  7,278,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,011,233
<PP&E>                                       8,094,030
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,866,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,800,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,608,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,964
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,182,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,800,261
<SALES>                                      8,760,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,760,306
<CGS>                                        7,044,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,044,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,897,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (177,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (55,223)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (122,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (122,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 303

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 12, 2000

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives and a conditional adjournment or recess

of the Senate.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, April 13, 2000, or Friday, April 14,

4 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res5 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

6 adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 2, 2000, for

7 morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second day

8 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec9 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

10 and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

11 of business on Thursday, April 13, 2000, or Friday, April

12 14, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent
2

HCON 303 RDS

1 resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

2 recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, April 25,

3 2000, or such time on that day as may be specified by

4 its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

5 or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

6 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

7 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

8 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

9 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

10 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead11 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

12 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

13 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives April 12, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert F. Scumaci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:



Date: May 8, 2009

/s/ ROBERT F. SCUMACI Robert F. Scumaci Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will be retained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
OFFICE OF THE A-I-TORN- GENERAL 6f TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

ATmRNE* oENlm*l. 

. 

: 

: 

prlvllag6d to tixmsP4r liquor fxan ~ttuo2-i &or 0 to ais 

oth6r lloeutmd pxwmltteta uxier 8uobxul~e a8 &be 

: 
: 

. 

. 

i . 

: 

, 

- 
‘. 

*. ” 

IionoraULsEsrtFord~lkvp3 

.: ,., 

: 

8~ 

:: 

:_ .,’ 

. :_ 

.. . 

\,, 

~pixi-c~~& Peb. P x946 . . 

St Carl08 Cb A&y. ' -. 

First Am5l&aut 

-AttoPney Qtmt$'al . 

1 

; .” / .,. . 

. 

.: 

. . 

i 

. 

.:
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 JACQUELINE MARUSIC

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

CASE NUMBER: C05-5787RJB/KLS

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and

the jury has rendered its verdict.

 XX Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

That counsel for the plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in

the gross amount of $13,987.75 less the prior EAJA award $4,439.33, less the Title II Attorney’s Fees

in the amount of $6,000.00, for a net award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $3,548.72

 October 20, 2009 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 s/CM Gonzalez 

By, Deputy Clerk
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 130

Expressing congratulations and thanks to United States and NATO troops

for successfully bringing peace to Kosovo and halting the brutal ethnic

cleansing of Kosovar Albanians.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing congratulations and thanks to United States and

NATO troops for successfully bringing peace to Kosovo

and halting the brutal ethnic cleansing of Kosovar Albanians.

Whereas the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) air

strikes on Kosovo have successfully halted the brutal ethnic cleansing of Kosovar Albanians in only eleven weeks;

Whereas on June 10, 1999, Yugoslav President Slobodan

Milosevic agreed to comply with international demands

and has begun to withdraw Yugoslav troops from Kosovo;

Whereas on June 10, 1999, NATO suspended air strikes on

Yugoslavia and announced a withdrawal of combat troops

from Kosovo and the entry of peacekeeping forces;
2

•HCON 130 IH

Whereas NATO troops were successful in bringing peace to

Kosovo with an air campaign and did not require the mobilization of ground troops;

Whereas NATO suffered only 2 noncombat casualties; and

Whereas NATO, President Clinton, Vice President Gore, and

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, successfully

reached a peace agreement with Yugoslavia that ends all

Yugoslav military action over Kosovo and the brutal ethnic cleansing of Kosovar Albanians: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress expresses congratulations

3 and thanks to United States and North Atlantic Treaty

4 Organization (NATO) troops for swiftly and successfully

5 bringing peace to Kosovo and ensuring the safety of

6 Kosovar Albanians.

Æ
EXHIBIT 11

    Statement re: Computation of per share earnings.  (Included at Note 5
of this Form 10-QSB).


                                    49
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135662 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135662 COA: 271965 Washtenaw CC: 05-001533-FH LEWIS DESHAWN FAIRLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1
 
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
 DATE:  June 6, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Byron L. BergrenByron L. BergrenPresident and Chief
Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Keith E. PlowmanKeith E. PlowmanExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KRISTINE WILMER,

Petitioner

v.

ALEXANDRA S. BETHMAN AND ANDREW 

BETHMAN AND ARTHUR W. WATKINS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 59 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
 Andrew Schenker, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Boveran Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Boveran Diagnostics,
Inc.





Date:
 February 13, 2009





By:/s/ Andrew SchenkerAndrew
      SchenkerChief
      Executive Officer