alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1



                             AMERICA SERVICE GROUP


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,         QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
                                        ---------------------------     ----------------------------
                                            1996           1995           1996              1995
                                        -----------      ----------     ------------     -----------            
<S>                                     <C>              <C>            <C>              <C>       
Net income (loss) attributable to
   common shares                        $(4,879,000)     $  676,618     $(5,254,032)     $  368,467
                                        ===========      ==========     ===========      ==========


Weighted average shares outstanding       3,050,981       3,053,692       3,219,572       3,024,876

Common stock equivalents                         --         255,364              --         312,932
                                        -----------      ----------     -----------      ----------

Total weighted average common and
   common equivalent shares               3,050,981       3,309,056       3,219,572       3,337,808
                                        ===========      ==========     ===========      ==========

Net income (loss)  per common and
   common and equivalent share          $     (1.60)     $     0.20     $     (1.63)     $     0.11
                                        ===========      ==========     ===========      ==========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.2**

**STATEMENT      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF **

**THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (a) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LandAmerica                Financial Group, Inc. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                G. William Evans    |   |   | Date:  | May                1, 2007 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | G.                William Evans        |   |   |   |                       |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer |   |   |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

On March 31, 2003, the National Science Foundation (NSF) issued a final rule that authorized the collection of meteorites in Antarctica for scientific purposes only. In addition, the regulations provide requirements for appropriate collection, handling, documentation, and curation of Antarctic meteorites to preserve their scientific value. These regulations implement the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, and Article 7 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. The NSF is required to publish notice of the availability of Meteorite Collection, Documentation, and Curation Plans received under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# DATES:

Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, or views with respect to this plan by November 1, 2023. This plan may be inspected by interested parties at the Permit Office, address below.

      ( print page 71611)    

# ADDRESSES:

Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Andrew Titmus, ACA Permit Officer, at the above address, 703-292-4479, or                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An Antarctic meteorite collection, documentation, and curation plan has been received from James Karner of the University of Utah.

Kimiko S. Bowens-Knox,

Program Analyst, Office of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2023-22622 Filed 10-16-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Before the Second Division,

June 26, 1967

No. P67/214.

#### Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c World Sales, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/2939, etc. (Los Angeles).

Eao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist *903of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin International, Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
# C_2017366EN.01000101.xml

| 27.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2015-2016 SESSION

Sitting of 11 November 2015

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 435, 24.11.2016.

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 435, 24.11.2016.

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 23 to 26 November 2015

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 448, 1.12.2016.

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 448, 1.12.2016.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Before the Second Division,

October 22, 1959

No. 63450.

protests 175223-K, etc. (New York).

#### American Express Company and Hermes of Paris, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of diaries the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Hermes of Paris, Inc.,*and *American Express Co.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 333, C.D. 1623), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Official Journal L 234/2017

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 234 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6012 September 2017 |

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 234

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6012 September 2017

---

| Contents | | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | II	Non-legislative acts | |
| | | REGULATIONS | |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1536 of 11 September 2017 on an emergency measure in the form of aid to holdings
  with no more than 50 animals of the porcine species located in certain areas of Poland when ceasing pigmeat production due
  to new requirements in relation to African swine fever | 1 |
| | | |
| |
| | | | |
| | | DECISIONS | |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2017/1537 of 4 September 2017 adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 3 of the European
  Union for the financial year 2017 | 6 |
| | | |
| |
| | | I	Legislative acts | |
| | | REGULATIONS | |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1522 of 2 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of
  the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the specific compositional and information requirements for total diet
  replacement for weight control (OJ L 230, 6.9.2017) | 7 |
| | | |

Contents

page

II	Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1536 of 11 September 2017 on an emergency measure in the form of aid to holdings
  with no more than 50 animals of the porcine species located in certain areas of Poland when ceasing pigmeat production due
  to new requirements in relation to African swine fever

1

---

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2017/1537 of 4 September 2017 adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 3 of the European
  Union for the financial year 2017

6

---

I	Legislative acts

REGULATIONS

*

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1522 of 2 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of
  the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the specific compositional and information requirements for total diet
  replacement for weight control (OJ L 230, 6.9.2017)

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally
  valid for a limited period.



  The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally
  valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 290/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6228 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 290

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6228 August 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 290/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 290/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 290/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9443 — Cintra/Meridiam/AUSOL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2019/C 290/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9440 — PreZero Recycling Deutschland/Nehlsen/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 290/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9443 — Cintra/Meridiam/AUSOL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2019/C 290/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9440 — PreZero Recycling Deutschland/Nehlsen/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ERIC LA PRICE, in his official capacity as

District Ranger for the Western Divide

Ranger District of the Sequoia National

Forest; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

SIERRA FOREST PRODUCTS,

Intervenor

- Defendant

Appellee. No. 17

- 17011

D.C . No.

1:16

- cv

- 00759

- AWI

- JLT

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 15, 2018

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge, and ZILLY, **

District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

MAY 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Plaintiff

- Appellant Sierra ForestKeeper appeals the district court’s decision

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants

- Appellees Eric La Price

, et al.

,

and Interv enor

- Defendant

- Appellee Sierra Forest Products. Having carefully

considered the record, briefs, and oral argument s , we affirm for the reasons given

by the district court in its order dated September 15, 2017.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
   
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 5 of
Registration Statement No. 333-13499 of Simula, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report
dated March 20, 1997, appearing and incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K
of Simula, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, and to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of this
Registration Statement.
    
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
 
   
April 24, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 282 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 282

 Declaring the ``Person of the Century'' for the 20th century to have 
                         been the American G.I.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2000

  Mr. Hayes submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Declaring the ``Person of the Century'' for the 20th century to have 
                         been the American G.I.

Whereas the 20th century was a century of conflict between forces of 
        totalitarianism and dictatorship and forces of democracy and freedom;
Whereas American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines, (collectively referred 
        to as ``G.I.'s'') fought, bled, and died in a number of conflicts during 
        the 20th century, including two World Wars, to secure peace and freedom 
        around the world;
Whereas in large measure due to the heroic efforts of the American G.I. more 
        people around the world enjoy the benefits of freedom at the end of the 
        20th century than at any other time in history;
Whereas at the end of the 20th century numerous organizations and publications 
        sought to identify and designate a ``Person of the Century'' based upon 
        achievements and contributions during that century; and
Whereas in light of the accomplishments of the Armed Forces of the United States 
        during that century both in defeating the forces of tyranny and 
        dictatorship and in embodying a sense of honor, decency, and respect for 
        mankind, it is appropriate that the American G.I. be recognized as the 
        single most significant force affecting the course of the 20th century: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress hereby declares the ``Person of the Century'' for the 
20th century to have been the American G.I.
                                 <all>
```
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LAMBERTO PASTRANA-GODINEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-616M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: December 20, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

Case 2:05-mj-00616-JPD Document 8 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will 

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 20th day of December, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-mj-00616-JPD Document 8 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7144

JACKIE EDWARD MESSER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PHILLIP KELLY; RICHARD L. VOORHEES; JERRY W.

MILLER; BILL HOGAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-97-126-1-MU)

Submitted: October 21, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jackie Edward Messer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district

court. Messer v. Kelly, CA-97-126-1-MU (W.D.N.C. May 27, 1997). We

note that Appellant's complaint should have been construed as an

action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court's denial of

relief was nevertheless proper because the rationale in Heck v.

Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), applies in Bivens actions. See

Abella v. Rubino, 63 F.3d 1063, 1065 (11th Cir. 1995); Tavarez v.

Reno, 54 F.3d 109, 110 (2d Cir. 1995). We modify the dismissal to

be without prejudice to Appellant’s ability to refile his claims if

his conviction is overturned or called into question by the appropriate court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         334,816
<SECURITIES>                                   130,839
<RECEIVABLES>                                  264,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,030
<INVENTORY>                                    177,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,062,971
<PP&E>                                         492,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                 244,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,552,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          322,800
<BONDS>                                        110,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,973
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,117,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,552,562
<SALES>                                      1,037,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,037,191
<CGS>                                          534,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  534,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (143,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,524
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (167,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (167,259)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)
        

</TABLE>
No. 61620.

#### American Almond Products Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 302824-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Plaintiff having raised no objection and following *The Best Foods, Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1791), the motion was granted.
No. 55733.

protest 166781-K (New York).

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the 'inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as not landed not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.