alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.2
                    COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                                     June 30                June 30
                                              -------------------     -------------------
                                                1999        1998        1999        1998
                                              -------     -------     -------     -------
<S>                                           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding ...................      16,895      16,195      16,743      16,093
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
   Stock options and warrants ...........         327         496         347         534
   Convertible Subordinated Notes(1) ....       2,075       2,075       2,075        --
                                              -------     -------     -------     -------

Weighted average shares outstanding .....      19,297      18,766      19,165      16,627
                                              =======     =======     =======     =======

Net income ..............................     $11,570     $ 8,548     $22,998     $16,240
                                              =======     =======     =======     =======

Adjustment for interest expense assuming
Conversion of Subordinated Notes(1) .....         804         806       2,412        --

Adjusted Net Income .....................     $12,374     $ 9,354     $25,410     $16,240
                                              =======     =======     =======     =======

Diluted earnings per share ..............     $  0.64     $  0.50     $  1.33     $  0.98
                                              =======     =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>


     (1)The Company's Convertible Subordinated Notes were dilutive for the
        periods presented.
# L_2022029EN.01004601.xml

| 10.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 29/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 29/46

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2268 of 6 September 2021 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653 as regards the underpinning methodology and presentation of performance scenarios, the presentation of costs and the methodology for the calculation of summary cost indicators, the presentation and content of information on past performance and the presentation of costs by packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) offering a range of options for investment and alignment of the transitional arrangement for PRIIP manufacturers offering units of funds referred to in Article 32 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as underlying investment options with the prolonged transitional arrangement laid down in that Article

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 455 I of 20 December 2021
  )

On page 41, in Annex VI, in points (25) and (26) of the amendments to Annex VI to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653:

for:

| ‘(25) | after point 75, the following heading is inserted:

  “
  Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than one year
  ”; |
| --- | --- |

‘(25)

after point 75, the following heading is inserted:

“
  Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than one year
  ”;

Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than one year

| (26) | after point 76, heading ‘Calculation of ratios’ is deleted;’, |
| --- | --- |

(26)

after point 76, heading ‘Calculation of ratios’ is deleted;’,

Calculation of ratios

read:

| ‘(25) | after point 76, heading ‘Calculation of ratios’ is replaced by the following heading: “Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than 1 year”;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(25)

after point 76, heading ‘Calculation of ratios’ is replaced by the following heading: “Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than 1 year”;’.

Calculation of ratios

Specific requirements for PRIIPs with a recommended holding period of less than 1 year

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CADE
INDUSTRIES, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          91,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,246,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,608,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,653,064
<PP&E>                                      27,583,578
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,521,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,838,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,699,368
<BONDS>                                      4,872,230
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,978
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,611,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,838,601
<SALES>                                     25,308,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,308,442
<CGS>                                       19,202,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,202,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,253,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             376,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,476,386
<INCOME-TAX>                                   467,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,009,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,009,386
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Form S-8 pertaining to the P.F.
Chang's China Bistro, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1997 Restaurant
Management Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. of our report dated January 26,
1998, except for Note 11 as to which the date is August 27, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
included in the Company's Prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1997,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 4, 1998
(registration number 333-59749).

Phoenix, Arizona                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 25, 1999
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael J. Coles, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     March 30, 2007           /s/ Michael J. Coles  Michael J. Coles    *Chief Executive Officer*
No. P68/78.

protests 61/23255 and 64/23591 (New York).

#### W. Kay Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Air Tractor Inc. P.O. Box 485 Olney, Texas 76374 

940-564-5616 940-564-5612 (Fax) www.airtractor.com 

November 18,2016 

Neil Rose, Manager 

AFS-81 0 Airman Certification and Training Branch 

F AAI Flight Standards Service 

800 Independence Ave. SW 20591 

Dear Mr. Rose, 

Please reference Exemption No. 5651P, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11498, letter dated 

October 28, 2016. 

Air Tractor would like to request additional time to implement the required changes to the FAA 

approved AT-802/802A Pilot Training Program referenced in Condition and Limitation 2 ofthe 

letter. 

The required changes to the previously approved training program are significant enough that 

Air Tractor requests that the currently approved training program, which was approved on Nov. 

12, 2015 be allowed to remain in effect for an additional90 days while the new program is 

developed. Air Tractor will commit to having the revised training program submitted to the 

AFS-800 office by March 1, 2017 for review and approval. 

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments regarding this matter. 

Mike Rhodes 

Chief Test Pilot 

Air Tractor, Inc. 

P.O. Box 485 

Olney, TX 76374 

(940)564-5616 ext. 319 

mrhodes@airtractor. com
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Royce Hassell v. Hassell Construction Co., Inc., Phillip Hassell, Shawn 

Hassell Potts, and Jason Hassell

Appellate case number: 01-18-00709-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-87708

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

On August 23, 2018, this Court provided notice to all parties that this appeal was stayed 

pursuant to the “Amended Notice of Bankruptcy Pursuant to TRAP Rule 8,” submitted by 

appellant, Royce Hassell, on August 10, 2018. At that time, this Court notified the parties that no 

further action would be taken until any party successfully moved to reinstate the appeal or sever 

with respect to the bankrupt party. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

On January 28, 2020, appellant filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal” with this Court, seeking 

dismissal of this appeal pursuant to an order of the bankruptcy court. We strike appellant’s 

motion to dismiss. Appellant’s motion fails to comply with Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3(a). The Court will consider a motion to dismiss 

accompanied by a motion to reinstate that complies with Rule 8.3. Id.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___March 5, 2020___
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August 22, 2017

Kelton Johnson, Esq.

Higbee & Associates

1504 Brookhollow Drive, Suite 112
Santa Ana, California 92705

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This letter responds to your request dated March 23, 2017, on behalf of Mr. Derek
Jones. The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after consultation with
the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved the request pursuant to
section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! for Mr. Jones to remain an institution-affiliated
party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (‘State Farm”), Bloomington,
Illinois, a savings and loan holding company (“SLHC”). This approval is limited to Mr. Jones
being an institution-affiliated party of State Farm, including by working for State Farm or an
independently owned agency that sells State Farm insurance products and products for State
Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington,
Illinois. If Mr. Jones seeks to work for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), or an
independently owned agency that sells products for another SLHC or BHC, he must obtain the
Board’s prior approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you
and Mr. Jones to the Board in connection with this request. Any change in the facts presented
could result in a different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These
representations constitute conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and
decision herein and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. This action
is also conditioned specifically on the receipt by Mr. Jones of all necessary regulatory approvals
and on his compliance with any terms and conditions that may be imposed upon such approvals.
Additionally, if Mr. Jones is convicted of, or enters into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime
involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or money laundering in the future, he must again seek
approval to work for any SLHC, BHC, or independently owned agency that sells products for an
SLHC or BHC, including any agency that sells State Farm and State Farm Bank products.

Sincerely,
Wan 67

Ann E. Misback
Secretary of the Board

112 U.S.C. § 1829.
No. 59841.

#### Air Express International Agency *v.*United States,

protest 265266-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed.
No. 51495.

Suit 4546.

#### Rudolph *Schick*v. *United States.*

C. D. 995 affirmed November 4, 1946. C. A. D. 348.
No. 65293.

#### V. Christensen Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/664, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                  UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE

                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               December 23, 1998 (Date of earliest event reported)

                            UGLY DUCKLING CORPORATION
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

         DELAWARE                  000-20841                86-0721358
     (State or Other              (Commission              (IRS Employer
       Jurisdiction              File Number)           Identification No.)
    of Incorporation)

           2525 East Camelback Road, Suite 500, Phoenix, Arizona 85016
               (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (602) 852-6600

                                 Not Applicable

          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
<PAGE>   2
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

      Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 is a copy of Ugly Duckling Corporation's
press release dated December 23, 1998 titled "Ugly Duckling Corporation
Announces Completion of Supplemental Exchange Offer."

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

(c)  Exhibits

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER      DESCRIPTION
------      -----------
<S>         <C>
99.1        Ugly Duckling Corporation Press Release Dated December 23, 1998
            Titled "Ugly Duckling Corporation Announces Completion of
            Supplemental Exchange Offer"
</TABLE>


                                       2
<PAGE>   3
                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                                UGLY DUCKLING CORPORATION
                                                        (Registrant)



                                                By /s/ Ernest C. Garcia  II
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                                   (Signature)



                                                Ernest C. Garcia II
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Date   December 23, 1998


                                       3
<PAGE>   4
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER      DESCRIPTION
------      -----------
<S>         <C>
99.1        Ugly Duckling Corporation Press Release Dated December 23, 1998
            Titled "Ugly Duckling Corporation Announces Completion
            of Supplemental Exchange Offer"
</TABLE>
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-40271 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ANDRES GARCIA-VELA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1678-1
Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public D efender appointed to represent Andres Garcia-Vela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v . F lores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Vela has filed a response. The record i s insufficiently developed to allow consideration at t his t ime of Garcia-Vela’s claim of ineffective assistance of c ounsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when t he claim has n ot been r aised b efore the d istrict court since no opportunity U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D January 3, 2014 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-40271 Document: 00512488445 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2014No. 13-40271

existed to develop the record on the merits o f the allegations.” United States v. Cantwel l , 4 7 0 F .3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal q uotation marks and citation omitted). W e have reviewed c ounsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the r ecord reflected therein, a s well as Garcia-Vela’s response. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s sment that the appeal presents no n onfrivolous i ssue f or app e l l a t e review. A ccordingly, t he motion f or leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from f

urther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R . 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40271 Document: 00512488445 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/03/2014
Before the Third Division,

February 17, 1955

No. 58780.

protests 201992-K, etc. (New York).

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 12.2
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Jaguar Mining, Inc. (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 2014 (the “Report”).
 
 I, Derrick Weyrauch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Derrick Weyrauch
 Name: Derrick WeyrauchTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: April 30, 2015