alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23348]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 05/05-0313]

Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company; Monroe 
Capital Partners Fund II, L.P.

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under section 309 of the Act and Code of Federal 
Regulations under 13 CFR 107.1900 to function as a small business 
investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License 
No. 05/05-0313 issued to Monroe Capital Partners Fund II, L.P., said 
license is hereby declared null and void.

Bailey Devries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, United 
States Small Business Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-23348 Filed 10-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Before the First Division,

June 12, 1967

No. P67/187.

#### Toyomenka, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 63/5510 and 64/17306(B) (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Go., aje üngar Electric Tools, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Oust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09534

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

09534\09534_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09534\09534_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09534\09534_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09534\09534_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09534\09534_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09534\09534_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09534\09534_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

09534\Supporting Documents\09534_BGS-MS-GPLT-0248.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09534\Supporting Documents\09534_BGS-MS-GPLT-0249.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09534\Supporting Documents\09534_BGS-MS-GPLT-0250.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09534\Supporting Documents\09534_BGS-MS-GPLT-0251.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09534\Supporting Documents\09534_Blount Arial Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09534\Supporting Documents\09534_Blount Arial Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09534\Supporting Documents\09534_Blount Steet Water Balance (Plant ID 09534).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09534\09534_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09534\09534_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 158

Designating the Document Door of the United States Capitol as the

‘‘Memorial Door’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 16, 1999

Mr. DELAY (for himself, Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr.

ARMEY, Ms. DUNN, Mr. WYNN, Mr. DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. GEJDENSON,

and Mr. BONIOR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Designating the Document Door of the United States Capitol

as the ‘‘Memorial Door’’.

Whereas on July 24, 1998, a lone gunman entered the

United States Capitol through the door known as the

Document Door, located on the first floor of the East

Front;

Whereas Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut was the first United

States Capitol Police officer to confront the gunman just

inside the Document Door and lost his life as a result;

Whereas Detective John Michael Gibson was the next officer

to confront the gunman and also lost his life in the ensuing shootout;
2

•HCON 158 IH

Whereas the last shot fired by Detective John Gibson—his

final act as an officer of the law—finally brought down

the gunman and ended his deadly rampage;

Whereas while the gunman’s intentions are not fully known,

nor may ever be known, it is clear that he would have

killed more innocent people if United States Capitol Police Officer Jacob Chestnut and Detective John Gibson

had not ended the violent rampage;

Whereas the United States Capitol Police represent true dedication and professionalism in their duties to keep the

United States Capitol, the Library of Congress, and the

Senate and House of Representatives office buildings safe

for all who enter them;

Whereas the United States Capitol shines as a beacon of freedom and democracy all around the world;

Whereas keeping the sacred halls of the United States Capitol, known as the People’s House, accessible for all the

people of the United States and the world is a true testament of Congress and of our Nation’s dedication to upholding the virtues of freedom;

Whereas the door near where this tragic incident took place

has been known as the Document Door; and

Whereas it is fitting and appropriate that the Document

Door henceforth be known as the Memorial Door in

honor of Officer Jacob Chestnut and Detective John Gibson: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the door known as the Document Door

3 and located on the first floor of the East Front of the

4 United States Capitol is designated as the ‘‘Memorial
3

•HCON 158 IH

1 Door’’ in honor of Officer Jacob Joseph Chestnut and De2 tective John Michael Gibson of the United States Capitol

3 Police, who gave their lives in the line of duty on July

4 24, 1998, near that door.

Æ
No. 53844.

#### American Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 935625-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

By virtue of the decision in *T. M. Duche & Sons., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 391), the protests were dismissed.
# Official Journal C 17/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 17 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5919 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 17

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5919 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 017/1 | Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7477 — Halliburton/Baker Hughes) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 017/2 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7819 — Freudenberg/Toray Industries/Japan Vilene Company JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 017/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7884 — Atos/Unify) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2016/C 017/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7823 — Acciona/Nordex) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 017/1

Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7477 — Halliburton/Baker Hughes) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 017/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7819 — Freudenberg/Toray Industries/Japan Vilene Company JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 017/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7884 — Atos/Unify) (
  1
  )

1

2

2016/C 017/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7823 — Acciona/Nordex) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 017/5 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 017/5

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 017/6 | Call for proposals and related activities under the 2016 work plan of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking | 4 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2016/C 017/6

Call for proposals and related activities under the 2016 work plan of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

BRYAN DONEY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5357FDB

ORDER GRANTING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 1) is GRANTED. Petitioner

does not appear to have funds available to afford the $5.00 filing fee.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 31st, day of July, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05357-FDB Document 4 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 1
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 288

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 22, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the importance of families and children in the

United States and expressing support for the goals and

ideas of National FamilyDay.

Whereas national evidence indicates that America’s kids are

faced with oppressive issues such as violence, drugs,

abuse, and even family stress, causing the future of the
2

HCON 288 RFS

children of the United States, and therefore the future of

the Nation, to be at risk;

Whereas families in the United States, regardless of their

economic status, ethnic or cultural heritage, or geographic location, are experiencing the pressures caused by

contemporary society while trying to raise and nurture

emotionally healthy and physically safe children;

Whereas Americans realize the challenges of spending quality

family time together amidst today’s busy lifestyles and

balancing work schedules and kids’ activities to regularly

share a family meal;

Whereas it is imperative that the people of the United States

act willfully and purposely to secure a positive future for

the Nation by devoting time to family bonding, sharing

traditions, and communicating values to children in an

effort to sustain the importance of family;

Whereas KidsPeace, one of the Nation’s oldest, most comprehensive not-for-profit organizations dedicated to helping children attain the confidence and courage needed to

face and overcome crises, has established National

FamilyDay to focus unified attention on nurturing family

relationships and improving family communications

thereby helping to build strong families which give kids

peace;

Whereas National FamilyDay will be celebrated annually on

a Sunday in March; and

Whereas National FamilyDay will provide opportunities for

families to reclaim the family mealtime which fosters

trust and builds better communication, and will encourage parents, grandparents, and caregivers to recognize
3

HCON 288 RFS

the importance of being involved in the physical and emotional lives of their children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the importance of children and

4 families to the future of the United States;

5 (2) expresses support for the goals and ideas of

6 National FamilyDay as established by KidsPeace;

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States

8 to participate in local and national activities hon9 oring National FamilyDay; and

10 (4) believes that families who communicate and

11 spend time together create stronger families which

12 give kids peace.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Before the Second Division,

April 26, 1956

No. 59868.

#### Rivoli Scarf & Novelty Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 258642-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Hefernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
March 3, 1960

No. 63923.

Suit 4968.

#### United States *v.*Dessy Enterprises, Inc.

C.D. 1993 reversed November 16, 1959. C.A.D. 722.
Before the Third Division,

December 18, 1946

No. 51481.

#### Protests 65765-K, etc., of Wm. Zakon & Sons, Inc., et al. (Boston and Buffalo).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0124
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Ugly Duckling Corporation:
 
     We consent to the use of our report dated February 10, 1997 on the combined
financial statements of Seminole Finance Corporation and Related Companies as of
December 31, 1995 included in the Form S-1 Registration Statement of Ugly
Duckling Corporation and the related Prospectus and to the reference to our firm
under the heading "Experts" therein.
 
                                          /s/ Barton & Company, P.A.
 
St. Petersburg, Florida
December 17, 1997
EXHIBIT  32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Par  Pharmaceutical  Companies,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Scott
Tarriff, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




/s/ Scott Tarriff
-----------------
Scott Tarriff
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004
Exhibit 4.10


 


IRREVOCABLE
PROXY


 


WHEREAS,  the
undersigned is executing this Irrevocable Proxy in connection with the private
placement by Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) of it securities
pursuant to a Confidential Private Placement Memorandum dated August 4, 2003
(the “Memorandum”).


 


The undersigned hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints Kenneth W.
Brimmer or Greg H. Guettler, or either of them, with full power of substitution
and revocation, the undersigned’s true and lawful agent, attorney and proxy,
for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name, place and stead, giving and
granting to each of said attorney all the powers the undersigned would possess
if personally present, to vote all securities of the Company entitling the
holder thereof to vote all voting securities held by the undersigned for: (a)
the approval an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, $.01 par value, to at
least 150,000,000 shares (or such other number as may be sufficient to allow
for the reservation for issuance of all shares of common stock underlying each
outstanding security convertible or exercisable for, or exchangeable into,
common stock) (the “Proposal”); (b) to cause and maintain a board of directors
(the “Board”) composed of seven (7) members; and (c) at the meeting at which
the Proposal is voted upon, approval of the election to the Board of Directors
of the four (4) persons nominated by Mark N. Schwartz and, once elected, the presence
on the Board of Directors of such nominee during such nominee’s respective
initial full term as a director, presented at any and all meetings, regular or
special, of holders of voting securities of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc., or
any adjournments thereof.


 


Notwithstanding the foregoing, the obligation
of the undersigned to vote the undersigned’s voting securities as aforesaid
shall terminate with respect to any nominee of Mark N. Schwartz, if such
nominee is convicted of any felony, any violation of any federal or state
securities law, engages in intentional or grossly negligent conduct in the
performance of his duties, or breaches his fiduciary duty to the Company as
determined by seventy-five percent (75%) of the Board.


 


By executing
this proxy, the undersigned hereby revoke all proxies heretofore made by the
undersigned.  The undersigned
acknowledge that this proxy is coupled with an interest in the common stock of
Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. and is irrevocable by the undersigned until the
earlier of: (a) approval of the Proposal; (b) the date of a meeting at which
four (4) persons are nominated by Mark N. Schwartz for election to the Board of
Directors; or (c) termination of the Offering without obtaining the Minimum, as
such terms are defined in, and as described in, the Memorandum.


 


Dated:  August 4, 2003.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Signature

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Print Name
##### 



Exhibit 12.1


Residential Capital Corporation


Exhibit 12.1  Computation of the Ratio of
Earnings to Fixed Charges




|                                          |                                    |           |           |   |           |           |   |           |           | 
|----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | - | --------- | --------- | - | --------- | --------- | 
|                                          | Twelve Months                     
|                                          | Ended December 31,                
|                                          |                                   
|(Dollars in thousands)                    | 2005                               |           | 2004      |   | 2003     
|                                          |                                    |           |           |   |          
|                                          |                                   
|Net income                                | $                                  | 1,020,626 |           | $ | 968,212   |           | $ | 856,815  
|Income tax expense                        |                                    | 606,300   |           |   | 642,140   |           |   | 509,121  
|Interest expense                          |                                    | 3,872,102 |           |   | 2,404,982 |           |   | 1,402,709
|Interest portion of rental expense        |                                    | 38,165    |           |   | 30,631    |           |   | 29,814   
|                                          |                                    |           |           |   |          
|Earnings available to cover fixed charges | $                                  | 5,537,193 |           | $ | 4,045,965 |           | $ | 2,798,459
|                                          |                                    |           |           |   |          
|Fixed Charges:                            |                                    |           |           |   |           |           |   |          
|                                          | Interest expense                   | $         | 3,872,102 |   | $         | 2,404,982 |   | $         | 1,402,709
|                                          | Interest portion of rental expense |           | 38,165    |   |           | 30,631    |   |           | 29,814   
|                                          |                                    |           |           |   |          
|Total fixed charges                       | $                                  | 3,910,267 |           | $ | 2,435,613 |           | $ | 1,432,523
|                                          |                                    |           |           |   |          
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        |                                    | 1.42      |           |   | 1.66      |           |   | 1.95     
|                                          |                                    |           |           |   |
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Advisory on Voluntary Private Education Loan Rehabilitation Programs

February 4, 2019

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation are providing this advisory to make financial institutions aware of the 

provisions for voluntary loan rehabilitation programs under section 602 of the Economic 

Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA). [Fotne1

- Pub. L. No. 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296 was enacted on May 24, 2018. EndofFte 1.]

Section 602 of the EGRRCPA (section 602) amended section 623(a)(1) of the Fair Credit

Reporting Act (FCRA). [Fotne2

- 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2(a)(1)(E). EndofFte 2.]

Under section 602, a financial institution may, but is not required to,

offer a loan rehabilitation program (hereinafter, referred to as a Section 602 Program) to private 

education loan consumers who have a reported default on a private education loan on their credit 

report.

If a borrower meets the requirements of a financial institution’s Section 602 Program, the 

financial institution may remove a reported default from the borrower’s credit report and the 

removal of a reported default shall not be considered inaccurate under the FCRA for a Section 

602 Program that satisfies the statutory requirements.

Section 602 Requirements

In order to satisfy the requirements of section 602, a loan rehabilitation program must, 

without limitation, include a requirement that the consumer make consecutive on-time monthly 

payments in a number that demonstrates, in the assessment of the financial institution offering 

the Section 602 Program, a renewed ability and willingness to repay the loan. A consumer that 

successfully meets the program requirements may obtain the benefits available under a Section 

602 Program only once per loan.

Financial institutions intending to offer a Section 602 Program should submit a written 

request for approval of their program to their appropriate federal banking agency. A financial 

institution’s request for approval of a Section 602 Program must address the statutory 

requirements of section 602. The appropriate federal banking agency will provide a decision or 

feedback to a supervised financial institution within 120 days of receiving a written request for 

approval of a Section 602 Program.