alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                       Exhibit 5


                        SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.
                               Counsellors at Law
                             Two Renaissance Square
                       40 North Central Avenue, Suite 2700
                             Phoenix, Arizona 85004

                                                      Telephone:  (602) 528-4000
                                                      Telecopier: (602) 253-8129

July 26, 1999


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         RE:      MESA AIR GROUP, INC. - RESTATED AND AMENDED EMPLOYEE STOCK
                  OPTION PLAN FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Mesa Air Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with its Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
relating to the registration of 1,250,000 shares of its Common Stock, no par
value (the "Shares"), issuable pursuant to the Company's Restated and Amended
Employee Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").

         In that connection, we have examined such documents, corporate records
and other instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of
this opinion, including the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the
Company.

         Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

         1. The Company has been duly organized and is validly existing as a
corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada.

         2. The Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the
Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                           Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.

                                           /s/  Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
Exhibit 32.1



BONANZA GOLDFIELDS CORP.

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment
No. 1 to the Annual Report of Bonanza Goldfields Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Man Chung CHAN, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    | By:    | /s/ Man Chung CHAN                                 
|------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|                    | Name:  | Man Chung CHAN                                     
|Date: April 7, 2022 | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
   
     Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. hereby consents to all references made to it in
Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of SpinCycle, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 1998.
    
 
                                          /s/   PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                  Pedersen & Houpt, P.C.
 
Chicago, Illinois
   
October 20, 1998
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews

Document

Number: 

# yrj*7)n-E-i7 7
Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:10 AM

Sheet 217 of 264CJO/X1/0.33 O UO.JJ . fJiUJOUOi t

08/05/9 8 09:4 1 ©1919941023 4 fR » Ki r I1 U P. 2 

# 4 s

# < 5 2

_ 'l-£V7 7

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t

Shaw n McKee , Pacific Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) August4,199 8 Mr . Herber tT . Segar s Flbrenetics , Inc . Telephon e Number : (732)636-567 0 Fa x Number : (732 ) 636-662 4 EP A AI R DOCKE T

Contac tSummary : Mr . Herber tT . Segar s wa s contacte d t o provid e infonnation o n possibl e cost s associate d wit h reducin g hazardou

s ai r pollutant

s (HAP) release

d durin g th e productio

n proces s fo r reinforced plasti c composite s b

y Fibrenetics , Inc . fo r thei r faciUt y locate d i n Woodbridge , Ne w Jersey . A s Mr . Segars wa s unavailable a

tth e time o f

m y call , I agree

d t o provid

e a writte n se to f questions . Pleas e respond wher e relevant ; 1 ) Has Fibrenetics , Inc. attempte d t o us e vapor suppressant

s i n th e past ? I f so , wha twer e di e approximat

e cost s fo r th e test s o f labo r an d materials ? CAJE rffirOe (Steb VAPeA. ^\J^f/tsS(AnrS <*J Ar(Z*A£

vJH&ag 

### Skcv-&&jLy Aooo/u ^ i£ *itr~ rZeztp-t&&**. -Al:. u*«-» - ***•<" Oi* i-T /£? « TVS A+ACTaGity e* ao/Z uuort—- dtS'C^uie Of

2 ) Ha s Fibrenetics * Inc . attempte d t o us e an y kin d o f non-spra y appUcation ? I f

so , whatwere som e o f th e problem

s o r successes ? Wha

twer e the approximat

e costs associate d wit

h labo r an

d materials fo r testing ? 

### frPP£ox.tM*nzty 7/% ' .« v ov* rtrfri. o^rtfur: Fife 2-f/e> rl+firiS C*>eA&tiVHJi 3e,kJ$&&*/&> C*AtJ Ite &h*J&t*b. Mc? fa&n**- IS 7t> vfe A fZ/ic& /£ » £ou~ex. -&$>&** Go*. u**jtuo^ -prti^ *#!> pocr. Carr- <£ /rfFecx.^^doo- ft>*t e<p-"&+* J 

### T; /ZOCUSJL 

### C0*&i£. £c-tns Ctut-o 6e 4zoot>~ ilS0*/i€A4.. \J^AA^ 

### INFORMATIO N I S ACCURAT E

_ 

### fixvnoM ep out

P<uc£& C&J

o*ii>4 Ge sf-jweo. ^e <-+*! O+C TrK SyZTTM

/S f '6COD .•• ; EL2 - 08/11/199 8 08:3 2 732636662 4 HBKhNETIC S 1N U r«u to a 08/05/9 8 09:4 1 ®191894iq23 £ . " » Ki r w i • "

3 ) Has Fibrenetics , Inc . change d an y o f the resins used i n th e facilit y to a lowe r HA P content ? I f so , pleas e detail the cost s associated wit h makin g thi s chang

e (e.g . labor used , labo r training , materials use d o

r wasted , etc.) . 

## /Jo

Wer e an y additiona

l certification

s necessary ? If

so , wha twere th e cost s fo r testin g an

d verification ?

Wer e ther e an y adde d labo r cost s (e.g . additiona

l trainin g needed , los s in productivity , additiona l labor needed , etc.) ? 

# /f/r

Wa s ther e a change i n materia

l costs ?

### AJ/ADi d th e chang e creat

e problems tha

tresulted i n a los s o f

business ?

Wer e ther e an y cos tsaving s (e.g . les s protective equipmen tneeded , les s materia

l needed , etc.) ? 

### K)//r

INFORMATION I S ACCURAT E 

# -j^J^^^

^
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Sandor Grosz, the Chief Financial Officer of Technology Solutions Company,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TechnologySolutions Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 12, 2004 By:              /s/ SANDOR GROSZ    Sandor Grosz    Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer**
I, Timothy A. Richardson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro LinearCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: November 10, 2004      By: /s/ Timothy A. Richardson      Timothy A. Richardson   Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Duncan G. Perry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Duncan G. Perry
                                        ----------------------------------------
Dated: May 15, 2003                     Duncan G. Perry
                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Artisoft, Inc. and will be retained by Artisoft, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL/FUGITT (CRO5-5896RBL) - 1 (253) 428-3800

Judge Leighton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-5896RBL

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL

)

WILLIAM GARY FUGITT, )

)

Defendant. ) )

The Court has considered the Stipulation executed by the parties pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) concerning a continuance of the trial in this case:

The Court finds that continuing the trial in this case is necessary in order to allow

the government adequate time to investigate information proffered by the defendant and

allow the parties effectively to prepare for trial.

The Court further finds, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), that the ends of

justice served by continuing the trial in this case outweigh the interest of the public and of

the defendant in a more speedy trial.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial in this case shall be continued

APRIL 23, 2007 @ 9:00 am, and that the period of time from January 22, 2007, up to and

including April 23, 2007, shall be excludable time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A); and

///

///

Case 3:05-cr-05896-RBL Document 36 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700

TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL/FUGITT (CRO5-5896RBL) - 2 (253) 428-3800

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the new Motions Cutoff Date in the case shall

be established as March 19, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of January, 2007. ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ Kent Y. Liu 

KENT Y. LIU

Special Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700

Tacoma, WA 98402

Telephone: (253) 428-3830

Facsimile: (253) 428-3826

E-mail: Kent.Liu@usdoj.gov

s/ Karen Unger (telephonic approval) 

KAREN UNGER

Attorney for William Gary Fugitt

Case 3:05-cr-05896-RBL Document 36 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick G. LePore, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

*This certification accompanies the Report and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.*

/s/ Patrick G. LePore

Patrick G. LePore

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

December  5, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

363 

KA 14-00544 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VINCENT OWENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Victoria M.

Argento, J.), entered February 10, 2014. The order determined that

defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender

Registration Act. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by determining that defendant is a

level one risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act and as

modified the order is affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a

level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA]

Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that the People

failed to notify him within 10 days prior to the SORA hearing that

they intended to seek a determination different from that recommended

by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (Board), as required by

Correction Law § 168-n (3), and that County Court did not otherwise

provide him with a meaningful opportunity to respond to the People’s

requested departure. We agree (see People v Scott, 96 AD3d 1430,

1430-1431). The risk assessment instrument prepared by the Board did

not assess points against defendant under risk factor 11, for having a

history of drug or alcohol abuse. At the SORA hearing, however, the

People for the first time requested that 15 points be assessed against

defendant under risk factor 11, and the court granted that request. 

We need not remit the matter to County Court to comply with Correction

Law § 168-n (3) (see id. at 1431), however, inasmuch as we also agree

with defendant that the People “failed to prove by the requisite clear

and convincing evidence that he had a history of alcohol and drug

abuse” (People v Coger, 108 AD3d 1234, 1234-1235; see generally People

v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571). Without the 15 points assessed by the

court under risk factor 11, the points assessed against defendant

under the remaining risk factors make him a presumptive level one
-2- 363 

KA 14-00544 

risk, and there is no basis in the record for granting an upward

departure based on an aggravating factor not taken into account by the

risk assessment guidelines (see generally People v Grady, 81 AD3d

1464, 1464). We therefore modify the order by determining that

defendant is a level one risk pursuant to SORA. 

Entered: March 27, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 66620.

#### Kreiss & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/5513, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of tile pictures in wood frames similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kreiss & Co., Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 236, C.D. 2261), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000877357
<NAME>                        Sepracor, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                         178,393,000
<SECURITIES>                                    82,471,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,062,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       560,000
<INVENTORY>                                      3,088,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               270,884,000
<PP&E>                                          23,665,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,356,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 305,375,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,969,000
<BONDS>                                        270,355,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         2,798,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,903,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   305,375,000
<SALES>                                          1,890,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,879,000
<CGS>                                              964,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,886,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   996,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,100,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,868,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,868,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,868,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.43)
        

</TABLE>