alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!"#Control $%&#'()(*(+,-

 !"!#$#%!&'(&#%#)*+&,#)(')$"%-#

'../01& 23451&(20/5/67

89/5:/;<&=>?#.)-/0/,#

(@A&BCD3@;6E&,1A/@:&#;:/;<?#!12#+.3#'((0.

>261& #,&F10@31G&/;15/</F51?#45675895:#'/3#'((0# >261& #,&*1;1A261:?#;<=<>7#'-3#'((0#

(20/5/67

 ??@A5#4186B5#C1A@B@72

.'+,#!1@D#47:557

EF1:B%7753#$E#'/''-#

(20/5/67&'H;1A

4186B5# GD5:

.H((#I5>7#;J5D<5

EF1:B%7753#$E#'/''-

HHH*HHH*HHHH#

,A/32A7&-@;6206&.@A&6E/G&(20/5/67

K1D5#48@7F

.H((#I5>7#;J5D<5

EF1:B%7753#$E#'/''-

HHH*HHH*HHHH

L>8@7FML>8@7F&A%8#

+12A&89/56?#'(((#

*A@GG&(5@@A&"A12&I.6CJ?#H+3'+'#

#;1A<7&,1A.@A32;01&)26/;<'#N.*.((O#/H#

 /61&#;1A<7&KG1& 9332A7L

PB5A7:@A@72#*#Q:@R#S<:AF1>5NT"7<O# '3'//3--(##

$17<:1B#Q1>#NT"7<O, .3.)'300)##

I%71B#PD5:=2#NT"7<O +3,H.3-))##

#;1A<7&=;61;G/67M

4@75#NT"7<U?7'U2:O )H##

4%<:A5#NT"7<U?7'U2:O .))##

#3/GG/@;G#N91>5R#%D#>@75#5D5:=2#<>5O

Q:55DF%<>5#Q1>#P8@>>@%D>#N!7E '5U251:O ,(0##

#5106A/0&>/G6A/F96/@;&K6/5/67

V<T5#PD5:=2#E1:%B@D1>3#WWE#

%26/@;25&"N1A2<1&-@342A/G@;

$17@%D1B#;J5:1=5#4@75#PXY .('##

$17@%D1B#;J5:1=5#4%<:A5#PXY ').#

Z#V@??5:5DA5#?:%8#$17@%D1B#;J5:1=5#4%<:A5#PXY *+)Z##

"<@BR@D=#I265 ??@A5##

S:%?5>>@%D1B#PD=@D55:#47186

4@=D17<:5[#\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

"1>5R#%D#7F5#A%DR@7@%D>#%9>5:J5R#17#7F5

7@85#%?#82#J@>@7#7%#7F@>#9<@BR@D=3#Y#A5:7@?2#7F17

7F5#@D?%:817@%D#A%D71@D5R#G@7F@D#7F@>

>717585D7#@>#1AA<:175#1DR#@D#1AA%:R1DA5

G@7F#7F5#SP#Q<@R5&

$116G&=;:9G6A7& 62;:2A:GO&.@A&=;:@@A&#;N/A@;31;625

-@;:/6/@;G?

]5D7@B17@%D#?%:#;AA56719B5#YDR%%:#;@:#^<1B@72 +1G&

;AA56719B5#IF5:81B#PDJ@:%D85D71B#E%DR@7@%D> +1G&

;R5_<175#YBB<8@D17@%D +1G&

,A@.1GG/@;25&#;</;11A

W@A5D>5#$<895:[#(((('(+

47175[#$E

K%FD#V%5

++#E%<D7:2#W1D5

EF1:B%7753#$E#'/''-

HHH*HHH*--//#

$%75>[#

.&#;66B@A17@%D#?%:#7F5#P$P`Qa#4I;`#8<>7#95#><98@775R#7%#PS;#G@7F@D#,#8%D7F>#%?#7F5#S5:@%R#PDR@D=#R175&#;G1:R#%?#7F5#P$P`Qa#4I;`#@>#D%7#?@D1B#<D7@B#166:%J1B#@>#:5A5@J5R#?:%8#PS;&

'&#IF5#PS;#PD5:=2#S5:?%:81DA5#`17@D=#@>#91>5R#%D#7%71B#>%<:A5#5D5:=2&#;#:17@D=#%?#-H#@>#7F5#8@D@8<8#7%#95#5B@=@9B5#?%:#7F5#P$P`Qa#4I;`&

+&#]1B<5>#:56:5>5D7#5D5:=2#A%D><867@%D3#1DD<1B@b5R#7%#1#.'*8%D7F#65:@%R&

,&#$17<:1B#Q1>#J1B<5>#@D#<D@7>#%?#J%B<85#N5&=&#A<9@A#?557O#1:5#A%DJ5:75R#7%#T"7<#G@7F#1RL<>785D7>#81R5#?%:#5B5J17@%D#91>5R#%D#C1A@B@72#b@6#A%R5&

H&#]1B<5>#:56:5>5D7#5D5:=2#@D75D>@723#1DD<1B@b5R#7%#1#.'*8%D7F#65:@%R&

)&#"1>5R#%D#!557@D=#;4c`;P#471DR1:R#)'#?%:#J5D7@B17@%D#?%:#1AA56719B5#@DR%%:#1@:#_<1B@723#;4c`;P#471DR1:R#HH#?%:#7F5:81B#A%8?%:73#1DR#YP4$;#W@=F7@D=#c1DR9%%T#?%:#B@=F7@D=#_<1B@72&

U.

 address. 

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided 

burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form

to this address. 

PS;#C%:8#H0((*.) !A20P/;<&%93F1A?& #,CQQRQSCTQQQBQLTBOC
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50051

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALLEN E. HORTON, also known as Mickey Horton,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CR-168

- - - - - - - - - -

February 23, 1998

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Allen Horton appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. Horton has

waived his right to appeal his sentence relating to a firearms

adjustment. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567

(5th Cir. 1992). The district court did not err in failing to

sua sponte order a competency hearing. See United States v.

Davis, 61 F.3d 291, 303 (5th Cir. 1995). 

AFFIRMED.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL A. BURNHART,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMANDER REED HOLTGEERTS,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0816-RSL-MAT

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiff is a Washington State prisoner who is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. On February 28, 2007, plaintiff filed a “Motion for Discovery.”

(Dkt. #38). Having reviewed the motion and the balance of the record, the court does hereby find

and ORDER as follows:

(1) In his motion for discovery, plaintiff asks defendant to provide, among other things,

information regarding the recording of inmates’ telephone calls. Plaintiff does not request the

court’s assistance in obtaining this information. Therefore, it seems as if plaintiff filed the motion

with the court because he thought that he was required to do so. Plaintiff is advised that he need

not file with the court copies of discovery requests that he serves on defendants. Because it was

Case 2:06-cv-00816-RSL Document 39 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

PAGE -2

inadvertently filed with the court, the Clerk shall STRIKE plaintiff’s motion for discovery. (Dkt.

#38).

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for

defendants, and to Chief United States District Judge Robert S. Lasnik.

DATED this 12th day of March, 2007.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00816-RSL Document 39 Filed 03/12/07 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DANIEL J. SIMMS,

Petitioner, 

v.

REED HOLTGEERTS,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-879-TSZ

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court, after careful consideration of petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the

briefs and governing authorities, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P.

Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and

ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner’s federal habeas petition (Dkt. No. 6) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to

Judge Donohue.

DATED this 4th day of December, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00879-TSZ Document 14 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 PETITION

Case 2:06-cv-00879-TSZ Document 14 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 2
Renewable Energy Atlas of the West: A Guide to the

Region's Resource Potential; is available at:

http://www.energyatlas.org
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

COLTER JOSEPH EPLER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30190 

D.C. No. 6:20-cr-00004-SEH-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Colter Joseph Epler appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

being a prohibited person in possession of firearms and ammunition, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30190 

affirm.

Epler contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the

district court gave excessive weight to his criminal history and insufficient weight 

to his positive personal characteristics. The district court did not abuse its 

discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The withinGuidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Epler’s extensive 

criminal history. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; see also United States v. GutierrezSanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the various 

factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the district court.”). 

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 3, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00868

- CV

Clifford Reed LEONARD

, Appellant

v.

Prunella LEONARD, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar Coun ty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI16519 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record for this appeal has filed a notification of late record, stating that the reporter’s record has not been filed because : (1) appellant has failed to request the record in writing , and (2) appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written pro of to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, which request must designate the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits

to be included. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b)(1).

It is further ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appe llant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

The reporter’s record must be filed no later than ten (10) days after the date appellant’s written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided,

ap pellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date the clerk’s record is filed , and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 7.3(c)._________________________________ Sandee Bryan Mario n, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of December, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEI TH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  6. This Annual Report on 10-K/A2 of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 7. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  May 23, 2007  /s/ Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer  and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
(Principal Executive Officer)
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0183 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 131

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet



### rework center overhead stowage boxes 32.0 $2,720.0 0 $6,118 $8,838.00 526 $4,648,788.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $4,648,788 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access , testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Sp **ecial considerations for Economic Analysis** (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? Y ES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska wh ere aviation might be the only mode of transportation? Y ES * NO

* 

### Explanation :
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TAL International Group, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Chand Khan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 7, 2008

/s/ Chand Khan
Chand Khan
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---
No. P67/346.

#### Franklin Lock & Pulley Mfg. Corp. *v.*United States, protests 62/19702, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A,” covered by the foregoing protests, consist of padlocks, not cabinet locks; that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of cabinet locks; and that said items marked “A” or “B” are of plate or disc tumbler construction similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       THREE            THREE            SIX             SIX
                                                       MONTHS           MONTHS          MONTHS          MONTHS
                                                       ENDED            ENDED           ENDED           ENDED
                                                       6/30/98          6/30/97         6/30/98         6/30/97
                                                       -------          -------         -------         -------
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>            <C>             <C>
Weighted average shares
    outstanding (A)                                   11,266,000 (B)   10,899,000     11,219,000 (B)  10,636,000 (B)

Weighted average common stock
 equivalents outstanding:
    Common stock
    Options                                                               554,000
    Warrants                                                              172,000
                                                                         ---------
    Total                                                                 726,000

Assumed treasury stock
 repurchases:
    Common stock
    Options                                                               326,000
    Warrants                                                               44,000
                                                                         ---------
    Total                                                                 370,000

Net weighted average common stock                                        ---------
   equivalents                                                            356,000



Total diluted weighted average
   common stock and common stock                                        ----------
   equivalents outstanding                                             11,255,000
                                                                        ----------
</TABLE>

A: All weighted average share amounts have been restated to include the 866,772
shares issued in connection with the pooling of interests transaction
consummated on June 30, 1998.

B: The effect of common stock equivalents was excluded from the calculation for
the three months ended June 30, 1998 and the six months ended June 30, 1998 and
June 30, 1997.




                                       15
No. 66138.

#### Metasco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/2404-S, 60/10831-S, and 60/22168-S (Tampa).

*338Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit: 10.19FT

                              NOTICE OF WINDING UP

         Pursuant to A.R.S. Section 29-781, SuperStar Kids' Club, LLC., an
Arizona limited liability company (the "LLC") hereby gives its "Notice of
Winding Up" as follows:

         1. The name of the limited liability company is "SuperStar Kids' Club,
LLC."

         2. The date of filing the initial Articles of Organization was February
5, 1999.

         3. Notice is hereby given of the dissolution of the LLC and the
commencement and finalization of winding up of its business and affairs.

         DATED as of the ____ day of __________, 1999.

                                        Futech Interactive Products, Inc.,
                                        an Arizona corporation, Member

                                        By /s/ Vincent W. Goett
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Vincent W. Goett, CEO
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CONTAX PARTICIPACOES S.A.

                                  CERTIFICATION

                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Contax Participacoes S.A. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2007

                                        /s/ Francis James Leahy Meaney
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Francis James Leahy Meaney
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 28, 2007

                                        /s/ Michel Neves Sarkis
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Michel Neves Sarkis
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris Craddock, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Keewatin Windpower Corp., for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Keewatin Windpower Corp.

Date: August 29, 2006

                                          /s/ Chris Craddock
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Chris Craddock
                                          Principal Financial Officer and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer
No. 55712.

protest 128169-K (San Juan).

#### Mendez & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
October 9, 1961

No. 66144.

Suit 6051.

#### United States *v.*North American Asbestos Corp.

A.R.D. 123 affirmed August 4, 1961, O.A.D. 783.
No. 76-5017.

#### Thomas *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.