alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6576

DAVID MEYERS
,

Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

I. GILMORE
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

No. 21

- 6727

DAVID MEYERS
,

Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

I. T. GILMORE, Warden
, Respondent

- Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge ; Robert John Krask, Magistrate Judge. ( 2:20

- cv

- 00627

- AWA

- RJK )

Submitted : October 4, 2021 Decided: October 13, 20212 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

David Meyers, a Virginia inmate, has filed two notices of appeal. Because the

district court had yet to enter a final order or an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss

these consolidated appeals for lac k of jurisdiction. We deny Meyers’ motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis filed in No. 21

- 6576, and deny his motion for injunctive relief

filed in No. 21

- 6727. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately p resented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 66136.

#### Korlis, Limited, and Metasco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 329313-KS and 59/29757-S (Tampa).

Opinion of

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 60294.

protests 190164-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### John Wanamaker, Phila. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wrn. 8. Pitcairn Cory,*v. *United States*(39 C. O. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51200.

#### Protests 79806-K, etc., of Geo. J. Higginson et al. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of oatmeal or oatmeal saucers and chowder cups, or puree cups the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thompson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833) and *Johnson Bros.*v. *United States*(15 id. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
(Reap. Dec. 10843)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 166.

*468(Decided November 4, 1964)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawkeNCe, Judge:

The proper value for duty purposes of certain bicycle tires, tubes, and tapes, exported from Holland, forms the subject of the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement.

Said appeal has been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation of fact agreed to by the parties, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows:

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise as that specified below was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale guantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, were the following unit invoiced prices net packed:

> Invoice

> Tires Per 100

> 2,000 24 x 1.75 whitewall_$75. 09

> Tubes

> 10,60026 x 1.75 butyl_ 32.48

> 2,000 24 x 1.75 butyl_ 31. 50

> Tapes

> 10,60026 x 1.75 _ 2. 77

> 2,000 24 x 1.75 _ 2. 77

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeal herein may be submitted for decision on this stipulation and is limited to the merchandise described and specified in the said stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts of record, the court finds and holds that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the bicycle tires, tubes, and tapes in issue and that said value is as follows:

> Tires Per 100

> 2, 000 24 x 1.75 whitewall-$75. 09

> Tubes

> 10, 600 26 x 1.75 butyl_ 32.48

> 2, 000 24 x 1.75 butyl_ 31. 50

> Tapes

> 10,600 26 x 1.75 _ 2.77

> 2, 000 24 x 1.75 _ 2.77

As to all other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE - 1 

2:06-cv-00921-RSL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Law Offices

K ARR ▼T UTTLE ▼C AMPBELL

A Professional Service Corporation

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98101-3028 

Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100 

Hon. Robert S. Lasnik 

Erik R. Lied, WSBA #11105 

Walter E. Barton, WSBA # 26408 

Karr Tuttle Campbell 

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900 

Seattle, Washington 98101 

Telephone: (206) 223-1313 

Fax: (206) 682-7100 

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 

Anthony B. Leuin, CA Bar #95639 

Zesara C. Chan, CA Bar #136302 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-6500 

Fax: (415) 421-2922 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY 

and TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CORUS PHARMA, INC., SALUS 

PHARMA, INC., ALAN BRUCE 

MONTGOMERY, and WILLIAM BAKER, 

Defendants. 

NO. 2:06-cv-00921RSL 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

This matter came before the above-captioned Court on a motion by Defendants, pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, for an order extending the discovery deadline for a period of 60 days to 

accommodate discrete issues addressed in said motion. The Court, having reviewed the records, 

Case 2:06-cv-00921-RSL Document 75 Filed 02/04/08 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE - 2 

2:06-cv-00921-RSL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Law Offices

K ARR ▼T UTTLE ▼C AMPBELL

A Professional Service Corporation

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98101-3028 

Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100 

pleadings and files herein and the parties’ submissions, and being otherwise fully informed in the 

proceedings, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Discovery 

Deadline is GRANTED. The discovery deadline is hereby extended until March 13, 2008. 

 Dated this 4th day of February, 2008. 

 A Robert S. Lasnik 

 United States District Judge

Presented by: 

s/ Walter E. Barton

Erik R. Lied, WSBA #11105 

Walter E. Barton, WSBA #26408 

Karr Tuttle Campbell 

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 223-1313 

Fax: (206) 682-7100 

e-mail: gbarton@karrtuttle.com 

 elied@karrtuttle.com 

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 

Anthony B. Leuin, CA Bar #95639 

Zesara C. Chan, CA Bar #136302 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-6500 

Fax: (415) 421-2922 

E-mail: aleuin@sflaw.com 

 zchan@sflaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 2:06-cv-00921-RSL Document 75 Filed 02/04/08 Page 2 of 2
No. 56837.

#### Pongees Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 145124-K and 143929-K (New York).

*365Opinion by

Ford, J.

The record showed that certain items of the involved merchandise consist of woven silk fabrics, valued at more than $5.50 per pound, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Walter Strassburger & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 210, C. D. 1326). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1T
Abrams and Company, P.C.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certified Public Accountants                           One Huntington Quadrangle
                                                                 Suite 4 South 1
                                                       Melville, N.Y. 11747-4406
                                                             (516) 454-9393 TEL.
                                                              (516) 454-6228 FAX
                                                                 Abrams@vdot.net


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Futech Interactive
Products (Delaware), Inc. on Form S4 of our report dated June 26, 1998 (except
as to Note 8a, the dates of which are July 10, 1998 and August 5, 1998),
appearing in the Prospectus/Proxy Statement which is a part of this
Registration Statement.


/s/ Abrams and Company, P.C.
----------------------------
June 9, 1999
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2241 PETITION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LARRY JAY PRITZ,

Petitioner,

v.

ROBERT J. PALMQUIST,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0376RSM

ORDER DISMISSING

§ 2241 PETITION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2241, respondent’s response, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice

Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the balance of the record,

does hereby ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner’s § 2241 petition (Doc. #7) is DISMISSED as moot.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondent, and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this _15_ day of August, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00376-RSM Document 15 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Seaspan Corporation (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I Kevin M. Kennedy, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 17, 2006



|    |  |                                                                     
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    KEVIN M. KENNEDY                                             
|    |  | Kevin M. Kennedy                                                    
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THE NAUTILUS GROUP, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC.,

 Defendant.

CASE NO. C02-2420RSM

ORDER DENYING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary that

the Crossbow Product Infringes Claim 1 of the ‘057 Patent and Claim 1 of the ‘704 Patent. 

(Dkt. #457). Plaintiff argues that the Crossbow meets every element of these claims, and

therefore, summary judgment is appropriate in its favor.

The Court has already determined that the Crossbow does not meet several limitations

set forth in those claims, and the Court continues to rely on the reasoning set forth in that Order. 

(Dkt. #519). As this Court has noted previously, if even one limitation of a claim is not met by

an accused device, either literally or by equivalents, there is no infringement as a matter of law. 

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc., 324 F.3d 1308, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2003). 

Accordingly, the Court finds that summary judgment in favor of plaintiff is not appropriate on

this issue.

Case 2:02-cv-02420-RSM Document 522 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PAGE - 2

Accordingly, the Court does hereby ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #457) is DENIED.

(2) The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this _27__ day of May, 2005.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:02-cv-02420-RSM Document 522 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2
October 14, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Representative Van Hollen’s Staff

FROM: Marc Thomas 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

A conference call was held on October 7, 2010 between Representative Chris Van Hollen’s staff 

and EPA to discuss how the proposed rule, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary 

Materials that are Solid Wastes (NHSM),” would characterize various secondary materials, such 

as scrap plastics and spent solvents. EPA explained that the definition of solid waste hinges on 

whether the material has been discarded and generally discussed how the proposed rule identifies 

which non-hazardous secondary materials are, or are not, solid wastes when burned in 

combustion units. 

List of Meeting Attendees: 

Bill Parsons, Rep. Van Hollen’s Staff 

Cheryl MacKay, EPA/OCIR 

Jackie Ashley, EPA/OAR 

Robin Dunkins, EPA/OAR 

George Faison, EPA/OSWER 

Marc Thomas, EPA/OSWER
**1998-  peanut_stocks_and_processing_12.29.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_11.25.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_10.29.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_09.28.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_08.27.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_07.29.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_06.26.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_05.28.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_04.30.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_03.31.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_02.27.98peanut_stocks_and_processing_01.27.98

**
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 21, 2023

NO. 03-23-00106-CV

David Henric, Cecilia Walters, and Wilton Cox, Appellants

v.

Branden Glover and Cavalry Solar Solutions, LLC d/b/a Apollo Energy, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES

DISMISSED ON APPELLANTS’ MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on January 31, 2023. Appellants have

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. 

Appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
No. P67/382.

No. P67/383.

#### Gold-Win Tool & Hardware Co. *v.*United States, protest 66/26533 (New York). Gold-Win Tool & Hardware Co. *v.*United States, protest 66/78100 (New York).

Kao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman’s*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KEVIN L. HENDRICKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THURSTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, TACOMA POLICE

DEPARTMENT, and OFFICER JOHN DOE

BUDINISH, 

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5374RBL

ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS

 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge J. Kelley Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record,

does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendant Thurston County Sheriff’s Office’s motion to dismiss is DENIED; 

(3) This matter is re-referred to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold; and 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold

DATED this 9th day of March, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05374-BHS Document 27 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                1999              1998
                                                                ----              ----

<S>                                                           <C>               <C>
Net Loss applicable to Common Stock                           (133,877)         (274,608)
Weighted average number of common shares equivalent:
Common shares outstanding
Common equivalent shares representing shares issuable
upon exercise of stock options and warrants                  4,721,349         3,676,054
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 issuances and grants               --                --
Shares used in per share computations                        4,721,349         3,676,054

Net loss per common share applicable to Common Stock             (0.03)            (0.08)
</TABLE>


Primary and fully diluted calculations are identical.
No. 62855.

#### Ross Products, Inc., and Freedman & Slater, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/8464 and 58/8293 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Con. Res. 168 Agreed to July 30, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, notwithstanding the provisions of section 132(a) of

the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 198(a)), the

House of Representatives and the Senate shall not adjourn for

a period in excess of three days, or adjourn sine die, until both

Houses of Congress have adopted a concurrent resolution providing

either for an adjournment (in excess of three days) to a day certain

or for adjournment sine die.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 99.1COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE     This Compliance Certificate is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and ServicingAgreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 8, 2005, by and among the Registrant, Hyundai MotorFinance Company, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”), Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, asdepositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee. The undersigned hereby certifies that:1) I am a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.2) I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of theServicer from July 8, 2005 through December 31, 2005 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’sperformance of its obligations under the Agreement during the Relevant Period.3) Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the Relevant Period.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this Compliance Certificate this 31st day of March, 2006.       HYUNDAI MOTOR FINANCE COMPANY, as Servicer   By: /s/ Min Sok Randy Park         Name: Min Sok Randy Park    Title: Director, Finance (acting as Vice President, Finance)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - [OMB Control No. 2900-0706]

# AGENCY:

 Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Thurdsay October, 13, 2023 the Veterans Benefits Administration (VA), published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection Application for Reimbursement of National Exam Fee VA Form 22-0810. This notice was published in error; therefore, this document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice, document number 2023-19049.                    

# DATES:

As of Thurdsay October, 13, 2023, the FR notice published at 88 FR 19049 on Thurdsay October, 13, 2023, is withdrawn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20006, (202) 266-4688 or email                         *maribel.aponte@va.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FR Doc. 2023-19049, published on Thurdsay October, 13, 2023 88 FR 19049, is withdrawn by this notice.

By direction of the Secretary.

Maribel Aponte,

VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-23090 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P