alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Meng Hao, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Year End Report on Form 10-K of Razor Resources Inc. for the period ended     April 30, 2015 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Razor Resources Inc.

Dated: August 7, 2015

/s/Meng Hao

Meng Hao

President, Secretary and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Razor Resources Inc.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50513 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DIANNA DENIS E TORRES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 1979

- 1

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Dianna Denise Torres appeals her 24

- month below

- guidelines sentence imposed following her guilty plea to importation of marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. She argues that her sentence is substantively unreasonable because the di strict court imposed a sentence greater than necessary based on an improper evaluation of the seriousness of her offense. Her contention is that she was entitled to a further downward

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 28, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50513 Document: 00514367075 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/28/2018No

. 17

- 50513

2 variance because she waived her constitutional rights when she was arre sted by disclosing her relevant conduct, which resulted in a substantial increase in her base offense level. A properly preserved challenge to the substantive reasonableness of a sentence will be reviewed by this court for abuse of discretion. Gall v. Uni ted States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The record reflects that the district court considered the arguments of the parties, the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and Torres’s allocution. Further, the district court identified the basis for its findi ngs that the preponderance of evidence supported the drug quantity attributed to Torres and also provided specific reasons for increasing the base offense level for her use of her minor children. Torres’s disagreement with the propriety of the sentence or the weight given to the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors by the district court does not suffice to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that applies to her below

- guidelines
sentence

. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51; United States v. Simpson , 796 F.3d 548, 557 & n. 51 (5th Cir. 2015). She has failed to show that her sentence does not account for a factor that should receive significant weight, gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or represents a clear error of judgment in balancing sentencin g factors. See United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). The sentence is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-50513 Document: 00514367075 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/28/2018
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Draft Socorro resourcemanagement plan revision and environmental impact statement**
 
Report | Appendices: A-IJ-O | Maps
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59/2:SO 1/DRAFT
Item Number:0629-E-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000654429
 
January 6, 2020
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Smart & Final Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 13, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Richard N. Phegley
|Richard N. Phegley    
|July 20, 2004
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 368

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Establishing a special task force to recommend an

appropriate recognition for the slave laborers whoworked on the construction of the United StatesCapitol.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 368

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States Capitol stands as a symbol of democracy, equality, and freedom to the entire world;

Whereas the year 2000 marks the 200th anniversary of the

opening of this historic structure for the first session of

Congress to be held in the new Capital City;
2

•HCON 368 EH

Whereas slavery was not prohibited throughout the United

States until the ratification of the thirteenth amendment

to the Constitution in 1865;

Whereas previous to that date, African American slave labor

was both legal and common in the District of Columbia

and the adjoining States of Maryland and Virginia;

Whereas public records attest to the fact that African American slave labor was used in the construction of the

United States Capitol;

Whereas public records further attest to the fact that the

five-dollar-per-month payment for that African American

slave labor was made directly to slave owners and not to

the laborer; and

Whereas African Americans made significant contributions

and fought bravely for freedom during the American Revolutionary War: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Speaker of the House of Representa4 tives and the President pro tempore of the Senate

5 shall establish a special task force to study the his6 tory and contributions of these slave laborers in the

7 construction of the United States Capitol; and

8 (2) such special task force shall recommend to

9 the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the

10 President pro tempore of the Senate an appropriate

11 recognition for these slave laborers which could be
3

•HCON 368 EH

1 displayed in a prominent location in the United

2 States Capitol.

Passed the House of Representatives September 12,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Before the First Division,

October 18, 1961

No. 66149.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/1909 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass payerweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64185, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
BefoRE Judge Donlon,

September 21, 1966

No. R66/40.

No. R66/41.

No. R66/42.

No. R66/43.

#### Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/15310 and R60/17287 (Los Angeles). Red Line Commercial Co. and Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/18134 and R60/18139 (Houston). Red Line Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States, reappraisements R60/19336, R60/21016, and R60/21017 (San Francisco). Red Line Commercial Co. et al *v.*United States, reappraisements R61/10795, etc. (New Orleans).

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap. Dec. 11147) and *International*Packers, *Limited*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the canned meat exported from Argentina, during the period January 1,1959, through December 31, 1959, described on the invoices of the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” and that such values per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and as stated in each entry and recited in said schedule “B,” during those periods which correspond to the time of exportation of the canned meat covered by the appeals for reappraisement recited in schedule “A,” which with schedule “B,” was attached to and made a part of the decisions.
**Exhibit 10.1**

**TERMINATION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT**

**          THIS TERMINATION**is made effective this 3rd day of January, 2006, by and between Northern Technologies International Corporation, a Minnesota company (the “Seller”) and Mountain Machine Inc., a Minnesota corporation, (the “Buyer”).

Preliminary Statement of Facts

          Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated September 30, 2005, for the sale of certain real estate located at 6680 Hodgson Road, Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the “Property”).

          Seller and Buyer desire to establish and evidence the termination of all their interests in and to the Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Termination.

**          NOW, THEREFORE**, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

          1.          Termination of Agreement.  Seller and Buyer hereby acknowledge and agree that the Agreement is now null, void and of no further force and effect.

          2.          Release of Property.  Buyer hereby releases, conveys, grants all of its interest in and to the Property unto Seller. 

**          IN AGREEMENT**, the parties have executed this Termination as of the date first above written.

|   | PURCHASER:                                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
|   | Mountain   Machine Inc.,                           |
|        |                                               |
|        |                                               |
|   | SELLER:                                            |
|   |                                               |
|   | Northern   Technologies International Corporation, |
|   | Matthew   Wolsfeld CFO                             |
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 287

EX PA R TE M A R LO N A . W A G N ER , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 2 3 6 5 0 - A I N T HE 3 r d DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM AND ERS ON CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 1 8 S. W. 2 d

8 2 4 , 8 2 6 ( T e x. Cr im
. Ap p . 1 9 6 7 )
. Ap p li c an t w a s c o n v ic te d o f a g g rava ted robber y and sente nced to thirty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. Ap pli c ant c on te nd s th at his c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e becau se he fa ile d to timely file a notice of appe al. We r emande d this a pplication to the trial court for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. T h e tr ia l c o urt ha s d e te r

mi n e d th a t t

r ia l c o un s e l f

a il e d to ti me ly f il e a n o ti c e o f a p p e a l. We2

find, there fore , that Applica n t is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time appe al of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 23650-Afrom the 3rd J udicial District Court of Ander son County . Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of a ppeal
so th a t h e ma

y th e n , w it hth e a id o f c o un s e l, o b ta in

a me an in g f

u l a p p e a l. A ll ti me li mi ts s h a ll be
c a lc ulate d a s if

the se nte nc e ha d b e e n im

po se d o n the date on

wh ic h th e mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s. We h old tha t, s ho uld Ap pli c ant de sir e to pr os e c ute an a pp e a l, he mus t take a ff

ir mativ e ste ps to f

ile
a wr itt e n n oti c e of

a pp e a l in the tr ia l c ourt

wi thi n 3 0 d ay s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: Fe bruar

y 10, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
# L_2022138EN.01001501.xml

| 17.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 138/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 138/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2022/753

of 16 May 2022

amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 in support of a process of confidence-building leading to the establishment of a zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 6 June 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 6 June 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 (1).

| (2) | Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 provided for a 36-month implementation period for the activities referred to in Article 1 thereof from the date of the conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in Article 3(3) thereof. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 provided for a 36-month implementation period for the activities referred to in Article 1 thereof from the date of the conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in Article 3(3) thereof.

| (3) | The implementing Partner, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, requested a 12-month extension of that implementation period until 10 July 2023, considering the delay in the implementation of project activities under Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The implementing Partner, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, requested a 12-month extension of that implementation period until 10 July 2023, considering the delay in the implementation of project activities under Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

| (4) | The continuation of the activities referred to in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 until 10 July 2023 does not have any implication as regards financial resources until 10 July 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The continuation of the activities referred to in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 until 10 July 2023 does not have any implication as regards financial resources until 10 July 2023.

| (5) | Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Decision (CFSP) 2019/938, Article 5(2) is replaced by the following:

‘2.   It shall expire on 10 July 2023.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2022.

For the Council

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/938 of 6 June 2019 in support of a process of confidence-building leading to the establishment of a zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East (OJ L 149, 7.6.2019, p. 63).

1

---
Before the Third Division,

June 28, 1949

No. 53347.

protests 109130-K etc. (Boston).

#### Wm. Zakon & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1 (I)

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  AmeriResource  Technologies,
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
(the "Report"),  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the
date hereof (the "Report), the  undersigned,  Delmar  Janovec,  Chief Executive
Officer  and  the  person  performing functions similar to that of a  Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ Delmar Janovec
Dated: September 18, 2007           ------------------
                                    Delmar Janovec
                                    Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                    Financial Officer
Oskar Environmental Inc. 95 Cypress Drive Youngsville, NC 27596

www.oskarsales.com ph: (919) 570

- 2862 fx: (919) 570

- 2863 mobile: (919) 971

- 2017

esithes@oskarsales.com



## Your solution to cleane r air... January 29, 2010

James H. Cunningham, Ph.D. Senior Research Environmental Science Engineer

RTI International

919.541.8834

Email: jcunningham@rti.org

Re: Budget Summary

Dear James:

The following budgetary project summary is broken out per your request. Industrial Air Quality, Inc. and Oskar Air Products, Inc. has formally joined together to become Oskar Environmental Inc. This allows us to offer better engineering and support to our customers. The numbers have

s lightly changed once we started to break the items out. We also included an estimated freight cost not previous provided.

System #1

**•** 6,000 CFM Fan, HEPA Housing $22,000.00

**•** D ucting and installation $16,000.00

**•** Estimated Freight $2,000.00

**•** HEPA Repla cement Costs $2,600.00

System #2

**•** 12,000 CFM Fan, HEPA Housing $25,000.00

**•** D ucting and installation $18,000.00

**•** Estimated Freight $3,800.00

**•** HEPA Replacement Costs $ 4,800 .00

System #3

**•** 18,000 CFM Fan, HEPA Housing $32,000.00

**•** D ucting and installation $20,000.00

**•** Estimated Freight $4,750.00

**•** HEPA Replacement Costs $8 ,800.00

System #4

**•** 40,000 CFM Fan, HEPA Housing $62,000.00

**•** D ucting and installation $22,000.00

**•** Estimated Freight $8,000.00

**•** HEPA Replace ment Costs $ 12,600.00

Does not include:

**•** Electrical controls, components or labor

**•** Lift equipment for installation

**•** Mounting stands for HEPA housings

**•** Removal of existing fans

**•** Wall or ceiling penetrations

**•** Freight, taxes and customs if requiredOskar Environmental Inc. 95 Cypress Drive Youngsville, NC 27596

www.oskarsales.com ph: (919) 570

- 2862 fx: (919) 570

- 2863 mobile: (919) 971

- 2017

esithes@oskarsales.com



## Your solution to cleane r air... General Description (Fans)

**•** Backward Incline

**•** Class III, Arrangement 9

**•** 304 Stainless on all parts in contact with gas stream

**•** Drain with Plug

**•** Quick inspection door

**•** Slide gate discharge damper

**•** Premium efficient motors

General Description (HE PA Housings)

**•** 14/16 gauge, 304 Stainless Steel

**•** Standard pressure rating of 4” W.G. (positive or negative)

**•** Double inlet and outlet adapters

**•** Access door (right & left side)

**•** Lift

- off doors with positive pressure knobs

**•** ANSI/ SMACNA approved

**•** Replaceable un it hardware and tracks

**•** Magnehelic gauges

General Description (Clamp Together Ducting):

**•** Stainless steel (304) welded seam ducting

**•** Elbows, transitions, reducers, and Clamps

Again, thanks for the opportunity to present this budgetary quote. If this project moves forward, I would suggest we schedule a plant visit along with one of my project engineers. We produce all AutoCAD drawings in house and can provide any of the component data per request.

Regards,

Ed Sithes

President

Oskar Environmental Inc. (9 19) 570

- 2862, office (919) 971

- 2017, cell
No. 67659.

#### Compass Instrument & Optical Co., Inc., and Julius Feist *v.*United States,

protests 60/28983 and 60/29497 (New York).

*283Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of map measures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kaufman & Vinson Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2180), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
---

Exhibit 99.13



M R Holmes

40 McDougal St

Milton,

Queensland, 4066

Australia



e-mail address:

michael.holmes@batepro.com.au



Phone (business hrs):  +61-7-33203312







CONSENT OF AUTHOR



TO:

The British Columbia Securities Commission

The Alberta Securities Commission

The Ontario Securities Commission

The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)



I, Michael Richard Holmes, Boleo Study Manager, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled, Baja Mining Corp.  An Updated Preliminary Assessment of the El Boleo Copper Cobalt Project,of the El Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated January 31, 2007 (the Technical Report) and filed in March 2007. In addition, I do hereby consent that any extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report may be filed with any stock exchange, any other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the publicly accessible company files on their websites.





Dated this 10th day of March, 2007











/s/ Michael R. Holmes______________

Michael Richard Holmes



---
No. 57822.

protest 139050-K (San Juan, P. R.).

#### Antonio de Cardi *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
No. 53352.

protests 146647-K and 138786-K (New York).

#### Van Gelder Fanto Corp. and Halfdan Hebo *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of sheep gall, and hog or ox bile, the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.