alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 152 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 152

Expressing the sense of Congress that urgent action is needed to limit 
the hardship endured by senior citizens when meeting their prescription 
                              drug needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1999

  Mr. Mascara (for himself, Mr. Wamp, and Mr. Ackerman) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that urgent action is needed to limit 
the hardship endured by senior citizens when meeting their prescription 
                              drug needs.

Whereas there are 39,000,000 medicare beneficiaries in the United States, an 
        estimated 35 percent of whom do not have prescription drug insurance 
        coverage;
Whereas senior citizens make up 12 percent of the population in America but 
        consume 33 percent of the prescription drugs;
Whereas senior citizens must fill an average of 18.5 prescriptions annually;
Whereas senior citizens spend 3 times as much of their income on health care as 
        do those under the age of 65;
Whereas prescription drug prices have risen at 3 times the rate of inflation in 
        recent years;
Whereas many senior citizens live on fixed incomes and are unable to afford 
        costly and unforeseen prescription drug costs;
Whereas prescription drug costs in the United States are between 30 and 50 
        percent higher than in Europe;
Whereas the cost of private health plans with prescription drug benefits are 
        usually prohibitively expensive and inadequate for those on fixed 
        incomes without insurance;
Whereas senior citizens without a prescription drug benefit must fill their 
        prescriptions at a cost at least twice as high as those with insurance; 
        and
Whereas current drug manufacturing industry pricing practices favor customers 
        who buy larger quantities than smaller retail businesses: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) prescription drug accessibility is crucial to the well-
        being of our country's senior citizens;
            (2) prescription drug costs should not prohibit our 
        Nation's seniors from taking the vital steps necessary to 
        maintain their health;
            (3) extending prescription drug benefits to seniors should 
        not require the creation of extensive new bureaucracies, 
        regulations, or price controls; and
            (4) Congress should pursue legislative measures to address 
        this matter as soon as possible.
                                 <all>
```
No. 58325.

protests 180368-K and 197817-K (New York).

#### J. L. Galef & Son, Inc., and R. F. Downing & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pedometers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Hornung*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 126, C. D. 1558), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 61623.

#### American Almond Products Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 306029-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Plaintiff having raised no objection and following *The Best Foods, Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1791), the motion was granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,119
<SECURITIES>                                     5,631
<RECEIVABLES>                                       60
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,867
<PP&E>                                           7,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,614)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,936
<BONDS>                                            761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,670
<OTHER-SE>                                    (51,958)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,409
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  41
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,078)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Catherine DAmicoCatherine DAmicoExecutive Vice President  Finance and
Chief Financial Officer 20
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Timothy J. Barberich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Date: May 10, 2005 |  | /s/TIMOTHY J. BARBERICHTimothy J. Barberich Chief Executive
Officer
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will be retained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Before the Third Division,

October 1, 1953

No. 57506.

#### Weiss Embroidery Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 199523-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries *255for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
No. 52411.

protests 38940-K, etc. (Philadelphia, etc.).

#### Keer, Maurer Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT (10)(b)

                         OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY

<PAGE>

                  [Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio]

August 28, 2003

Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:   WRL Freedom Navigator
      Separate Account VA U
      Registration on Form N-4

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the WRL Freedom Navigator policies are those
deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)      the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the
         policies;

(2)      the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
         policies; and

(3)      the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and
         management of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that
         provides for a reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)      Service Charge and Administrative Charge;

(ii)     Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E);

(iii)    Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable);

(iv)     Surrender Charges; and

(v)      Any applicable rider fees or charges.

<PAGE>

Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio
August 28, 2003
Page 2

The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the WRL Freedom Navigator, to achieve a
reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of industry
practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred. Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges. In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the registration statement.

/s/ Richard Greer
------------------------------------------
Richard Greer, FSA, MAAA
Managing Actuary
Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50565 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Karl Edward Butler,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:01

- CR

- 124

- 2

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Karl Edward Butler appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court erred in relying on a bare allegation to determine that he committed a Grade A violation of his conditions of supervision. As B utler acknowledges, because he failed to raise

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2022
Lyle W. Cayc e Clerk Case: 21-50565 Document: 00516257012 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022No. 21

- 50565

2 this argument in the district court, our review is for plain error only. See
Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009).

We have held “ that it is error for a district court to rely on a bare arrest record at sentencing because it does not provide sufficient indicia of reliability to satisfy due process.” United States v. Zarco

- Beiza , 24 F.4th 477, 482 (5th Cir. 2022) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Further, a district court errs “when it relies on a bare allegation of a new law violation
contained in a revocation petition.” United States v. Foley , 946 F.3d 681 , 687 (5th Cir. 2020)

. There is more here, though, tha n a ba re arrest record or a claim in a revocation petition. The extra is what Butler himself admitted.
One of Butler’s alleged violations of his conditions of supervision
involved his arrest and charge for a state offense in 2020. Butler pled true to
this alle gation and admitted conduct underlying the arrest . Although he argues that his admissions were insufficient to support reliance as to one aspect of the offense charged , he fails to show an error that i s “ clear or
obvious. ” Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135. Acco rdingly, the district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-50565 Document: 00516257012 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Thorne, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DynCorp International LLC (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

| |  | /s/ Michael J. ThorneMichael J. Thorne Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: June 20, 2007
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laser-Pacific  Media Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert McClain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/Robert McClain
-----------------
Robert McClain
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 1    LETTER DATED 3/15/99 FROM ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


March 15, 1999



Mr. Jim Heim
Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
2030 East Speedway Boulevard
Tucson, Arizona  85719

Dear Mr. Heim:

This is to confirm that the client-auditor relationship between Prologic
Management Systems, Inc. and Arthur Andersen LLP has ceased.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP



Copy to: Office of the Chief Accountant
         SECPS Letter File
         Securities and Exchange Commission
         Mail Stop 9-5
         450 Fifth Street, N.W.
         Washington, D.C.  20549
Before the Third Division,

March 8, 1961

No. 65266.

#### Charles M. Schayer *v.*United States,

protest 59/25839 (Denver).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the involved cut diamonds and gold jewelry were manufactures of the United States, having been returned to the United States after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that all of the applicable customs regulations had been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Abstracts 47521 and 64361 followed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     267,095,000
<SECURITIES>                               476,501,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,317,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   248,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,624,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           758,644,000
<PP&E>                                      32,381,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,229,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             827,778,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       65,243,000
<BONDS>                                    853,008,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,278,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (103,730,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               827,778,000
<SALES>                                     13,866,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,133,000
<CGS>                                        4,770,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,970,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            54,607,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,981,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (54,037,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (54,037,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (54,037,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICA SERVICE GROUP INC FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,804,000
<SECURITIES>                                   993,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,540,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (119,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    271,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,211,000
<PP&E>                                       4,576,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,263,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,704,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,007,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,842,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,472,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,704,000
<SALES>                                     27,632,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,632,000
<CGS>                                       24,842,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,897,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (1,595,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (132,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,462,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,462,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,462,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.41
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

February 10, 1955

No. 58761.

protest 239341-K (New York).

#### Barsamian-Moomjy Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 6, 2016

Order 

Clerk

April 6, 2016

153182(53)

KALI PUNG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 153182

v COA: 327793

Gratiot CC: 14-011947-CK

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Michael W. Pung to participate as 

amicus curiae and file an amicus brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on 

April 1, 2016, is accepted for filing.