alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10602)

#### Joe Markovits, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1018495.

(Decided October 15, 1963)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the.defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision .upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court,, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement was imported after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and is not identified on the Pinal List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521) ; and accordingly appraisement was. made under the provisions of section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by said Customs Simplification Act.

> 2. That on or about the date of exportation of the involved merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United

> *422States, such prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were equal to the invoice unit values plus inland freight as invoiced, but excluding the item invoiced as buying commission.

> 3. That the appeal may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such values were the invoice unit values, plus inland freight as invoiced, but excluding the item invoiced as buying commission.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
BOARD Of GOVERNORS 

or THE 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Jay Levine, Esq. 

Head ofRBS Global Banking 

& Markets, North America 

The Royal Bank of Scotland pIc 

101 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10178 

Dear Mr. Levine: 

WASHINGTON, O. r:::. 20551 

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE 

TO THE BOARD 

March 18, 2010 

On October 12,2007, the Board approved a temporary exemption from section 23A ofthe 

Federal Reserve Actl to allow the branches of The Royal Bank of Scotland pIc, Edinburgh, 

Scotland, to engage in reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing transactions with 

its affiliated broker-dealer in conjunction with actions the Board took simultaneously to provide 

insured depository institutions with access to term loans at the discount window? These 

activities were intended to allow the branches to extend credit to market participants in need of 

short-term liquidity to finance the participants' holdings of certain mortgage loans and assetbacked securities. 

The Board's approval noted that the exemption was temporary and available only as long 

as the special accommodation at the discount window was available. 3 On February 18, 2010, the 

Board announced that, in light of the continued improvement in financial markets, the typical 

maximum maturity for primary credit loans at the discount window would be shortened to 

overnight, effective March 18,2010. In light of this normalization of the term for discount 

window loans, the Board has terminated the temporary section 23A exemption. 

Very truly yours, 

Robert deV. Frierson 

Deputy Secretary of the Board 

cc: Federal Reserve Bank of New York 

1 12 u.S.C. § 37lc. 

2 Board letter to Jay Levine, Esq. (The Royal Bank of Scotland pIc), dated October 12,2007. 

3 Id.
No. 51489.

#### Protests 820295-G, etc., of Lun Tai & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges was sustained.
-                      -                        -  About 
                      - Newsroom
                      -  Newsroom 
                      -  Blog 
                      -  Events 
                      -  Fact Sheets 
                      -  FEMA Live 
                      -  Mobile Products 
                      -  Newsletters 
                      -  Press Releases 
                      -  Podcast 
                      -  Social Media 
                      -  About Us 
                      -  Reports & Data 
                      -  FEMA in Action 

# PrepTalks: Dr. Howard Kunreuther “Human Biases: Why People Underprepare for Disasters”

                            - English 

February 25, 2020

**Symposium date: September 19, 2019**

In his PrepTalk, Dr. Howard Kunreuther discusses the processes and biases in decision-making under uncertainty. He also proposes a behavioral risk audit that couples protective decision-making with economic incentives, enabling individual and collective actions to achieve greater resilience.  

Dr. Howard Kunreuther is the Co-Director of the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, University of Pennsylvania and serves the following roles: Professor Emeritus of Decision Sciences and Public Policy in the Operations, Information, and Decisions Department and Co-Director of the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center.

## Download PrepTalk Materials

                        - PrepTalk facilitator slides
                        - Dr. Howard Kunreuther's biography

### View Other PrepTalks

Preptalks are given by subject-matter experts and through leaders to spread new ideas, spark conversation and promote innovative leadership for the issues confronting emergency managers over the next 20 years. Explore more videos.

Individuals & Civic Engagement

PrepTalk

Last updated March 22, 2021

Return to top
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference, in the registration statements of
Bowmar Instrument Corporation and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File nos. 33-57230,
33-9776, 33-62247 and 333-18463) of our report dated December 2, 1997 except for
Notes 16 and 17 for which the date is December 19, 1997 on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Bowmar Instrument Corporation and
Subsidiaries, as of September 27, 1997 and September 28, 1996, and for each of
the three years in the period ended September 28, 1997, which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Phoenix, Arizona
January 7, 1998
No. 67646.

#### I. Magnin & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/8688 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon ladies’ knit outerwear similar in use to silk knit outerwear and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                          34,190
<SECURITIES>                                    26,361
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,389
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,979
<PP&E>                                          17,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           269
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,794
<SALES>                                            280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,707
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,348)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,803
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,663
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-71;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By:  /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES ERNEST DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL PORTER, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5302 FDB/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. # 10) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, and to the Hon. Karen

L. Strombom.

DATED this 31st day of October 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05302-FDB Document 14 Filed 10/31/06 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****U.S. National Park Serviceinternational programs quarterly bulletin [electronic resource].**
 
2006:Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec
2007:Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec
2008:Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun| Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec
2009:Jan-Mar | Apr-Sep
2010:Jan-Mar
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.151:
Item Number:0648-A-19 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000654235
 
January 6, 2020
<PAGE>   1
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of Zila, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated October 18, 1996, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zila, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 1996 and to
the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part
of this Registration Statement.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

July 18, 1997


                                  EXHIBIT 23-A
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4



                                           INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the use in the Registration Statement of Osage Systems Group, Inc.
on Form S-3, of our report dated January 16, 1998 on the financial statements of
Open Systems Technologies, Inc., appearing in such Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Registration Statement.






/s/ Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.
--------------------------------------------

CLARK, SCHAEFER, HACKETT & CO.


Cincinnati, Ohio

April 20, 1999
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00473

- CV

In the Matter of the McBryde Family Trust

On Appeal from the 198th District Court of Kerr County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1925B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Oc tober 21, 2021
No. P66/328.

#### Alexanders Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/873, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 60306.

protest 296820-K (New York).

#### Acrow, Incorporated, and Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States,

*402Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of building shores or jacks the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

TENNISON CONSTRUCTION, INC., et

al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-2004JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received the parties’ stipulation to continue certain case management

deadlines (Dkt. # 37). The court DENIES the stipulation, because it would place the

deadline for dispositive motions less than 90 days before trial, currently set for April 10,

2007. If the parties wish to enter a new stipulation to continue case management

deadlines, they must do so in compliance with this order.

The court enters orders setting trial dates and related dates to provide a reasonable

schedule for the resolution of disputes. That schedule generally provides approximately

90 days between the deadline for filing dispositive motions and the trial date. With

dispositive motions due 90 days before trial, they will generally be ripe for consideration

one month later. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(d)(3). The court’s calendar

Case 2:05-cv-02004-JLR Document 38 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 2

generally permits it to enter a decision on dispositive motions within 30 days. See Local

Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(b)(5). In order to permit the parties to consider the court’s

decision on dispositive motions and plan for trial or an alternative resolution, the court

generally requires at least 30 days between the court’s decision and the trial date. For

these reasons, the court will rarely set the deadline for dispositive motions less than 90

days before the trial date. 

The court will deny any stipulation that does not provide a compelling reason to

abandon these case management principles. Thus, if the parties seek to modify case

management deadlines in a manner inconsistent with this order, they must provide the

court with a compelling reason for doing so. If appropriate, the parties may consent to a

shortened schedule for briefing dispositive motions, but they must explicitly state the

shortened schedule in their stipulation.

When entering a stipulation to change a case management deadline, the parties

must explicitly state the effect that the change will have on all subsequent case

management deadlines, if any. The stipulation must expressly request a specific new date

for each subsequent deadline.

Filed and entered this 21st day of September, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-02004-JLR Document 38 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 56212.

protest 164876-K (New York).

#### Dan Brechner & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 51209.

#### Protest 48640-K of Ti Hang Lung & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the original hearing the United States examiner testified that the merchandise consisted of “just dry frog; whole frogs, dried.” It was held that the collector’s classification was incorrect since frogs are not meats, following *Pacific Trading Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610), and that the merchandise was dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as unenumerated articles. However, since no testimony was introduced to show by what process the frogs were dried, it was held that they were dutiable as manufactured articles. At the rehearing the examiner testified that the frogs were whole, not cut up, with no parts missing, and that he did not know whether they were sun dried or dried by some other process. Since the additional testimony did not indicate what process was used in drying the frogs, the court adhered to its original decision sustaining the protest and holding the merchandise dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as an unenumerated manufactured article.
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005

[Wells Fargo logo]					Auto Finance Division
							711 W Broadway Road
							Tempe, AZ 85282



                          OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer for the Banc of America Securities
Auto Trust 2005-WF1, certifies that:

	(i)	a review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
		from the Cutoff Date of May 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005
		and of its performance under this Agreement has been made
		under such officer's supervision; and

	(ii)	to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such
		review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
		under this Agreement throughout such period in all
		material respects.


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer


/s/ Patty Lindsey
Patty Lindsey
Vice President
Servicing Manager - Auto Finance Group
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance
   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Des Moines,
IowaMarch 13, 2006




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Ellen Z. Lamale
Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary March 13, 2006




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and
 2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and
 2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture