50–870 PDF 

Calendar No. 104 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 1st Session 111–45 

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS 

BILL, 2010 

JULY 9, 2009.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. DORGAN, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany S. 1436] 

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1436) making appropriations for energy and water development and related 

agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for 

other purposes, favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do 

pass. 

The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the bill 

(H.R. 0000) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2010, and for other purposes, reports the same to the Senate with 

an amendment, and an amendment to the title, and recommends 

that the bill as amended do pass. 

Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2010 

Total of bill as reported to the Senate .................... $34,271,000,000 

Amount of 2009 appropriations ............................... 92,533,165,000 

Amount of 2010 budget estimate ............................ 34,914,709,000 

Bill as recommended to Senate compared to— 

2009 appropriations .......................................... ¥58,262,165,000 

2010 budget estimate ........................................ ¥643,709,000 
(2) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 4 

Summary of Estimates and Recommendations ..................................................... 4 

Title I: 

Department of Defense—Civil: Department of the Army: 

Corps of Engineers—Civil: 

General Investigations ....................................................................... 16 

Construction, General ........................................................................ 32 

Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries ........................... 50 

Operation and Maintenance, General .............................................. 52 

Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies .......................................... 73 

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program ......................... 74 

General Expenses ............................................................................... 74 

General Provisions—Corps of Engineers—Civil .............................. 76 

Title II: 

Department of the Interior: 

Central Utah Project Completion Account .............................................. 78 

Bureau of Reclamation: 

Water and Related Resources ........................................................... 78 

Central Valley Project Restoration Fund ......................................... 86 

California Bay-Delta Restoration ...................................................... 86 

Policy and Administration ................................................................. 86 

General Provisions—Department of the Interior .................................... 87 

Title III: 

Department of Energy: 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ............................................... 89 

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ..................................... 96 

Nuclear Energy .................................................................................. 97 

Fossil Energy Research and Development ....................................... 100 

Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves ........................................ 102 

Strategic Petroleum Reserve ............................................................. 102 

Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve .............................................. 102 

Energy Information Administration ................................................. 103 

Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup ..................................................... 103 

Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund .. 104 

Science ........................................................................................................ 104 

High Energy Physics .......................................................................... 105 

Nuclear Physics .................................................................................. 105 

Biological and Environmental Research .......................................... 105 

Basic Energy Sciences ....................................................................... 105 

Nuclear Waste Disposal ............................................................................ 108 

Departmental Administration .................................................................. 109 

Office of Inspector General ....................................................................... 109 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities: 

National Nuclear Security Administration: 

Weapons Activities ...................................................................... 110 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ............................................. 115 

Naval Reactors ............................................................................ 117 

Office of the Administrator ........................................................ 118 

Environmental and Other Defense Activities: 

Defense Environmental Cleanup ...................................................... 118 

Other Defense Activities .................................................................... 121 

Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal ...................................................... 121 

Power Marketing Administrations: 

Operation and Maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration ....................................................................................... 122 
Page

3 

Title III—Continued 

Department of Energy—Continued 

Environmental and Other Defense Activities—Continued 

Power Marketing Administrations—Continued 

Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration ....................................................................................... 122 

Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and Maintenance, 

Western Area Power Administration ..................................... 122 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Salaries and Expenses .. 123 

General Provisions—Department of Energy ........................................... 154 

Title IV: 

Independent Agencies: 

Appalachian Regional Commission .......................................................... 155 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board ................................................. 155 

Delta Regional Authority .......................................................................... 156 

Denali Commission ................................................................................... 156 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission .............................................................. 156 

Office of Inspector General ................................................................ 157 

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board .................................................. 157 

Tennessee Valley Authority Office of the Inspector General ................. 157 

General Provision—Independent Agencies ............................................. 158 

Title V: General Provisions ..................................................................................... 159 

Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate ................................................................................................................... 160 

Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate ................................................................................................................... 160 

Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate ................................................................................................................... 161 

Budgetary Impact Statement ................................................................................. 166 

Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items ...................................... 166 

Comparative Statement of Budget Authority ........................................................ 230 
(4) 

PURPOSE 

The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for the fiscal 

year 2010 beginning October 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 

2010, for energy and water development, and for other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources development programs 

and related activities of the Department of the Army, Civil Functions—U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Civil Works Program in title 

I; for the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation in 

title II; for the Department of Energy’s energy research activities, 

including environmental restoration and waste management, and 

atomic energy defense activities of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration in title III; and for related independent agencies 

and commissions, including the Appalachian Regional Commission, 

Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, and the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission in title IV. 

SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

The fiscal year 2010 budget estimates for the bill total 

$34,914,709,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The recommendation of the Committee totals $34,271,000,000. This is 

$643,709,000 below the budget estimates and $58,262,165,000 

below the enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year. 

SUBCOMMITTEE HEARINGS

The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water held 

three sessions in connection with the fiscal year 2010 appropriation 

bill. Witnesses included officials and representatives of the Federal 

agencies under the subcommittee’s jurisdiction. 

The recommendations for fiscal year 2010 therefore, have been 

developed after careful consideration of available data. 

VOTES IN THE COMMITTEE

By a vote of 30 to 0 the Committee on July 9, 2009, recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the Senate. 
(5) 

TITLE I 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL

INTRODUCTION

The Corps of Engineers is made up of approximately 35,000 civilian and 650 military members that perform both military and civil 

works functions. The military and civilian engineers, scientists and 

other specialists work hand in hand as leaders in engineering and 

environmental matters. The diverse workforce of biologists, engineers, geologists, hydrologists, natural resource managers, and 

other professionals meets the demands of changing times and requirements as a vital part of America’s Army. 

The Corps’ mission is to provide quality, responsive engineering 

services to the Nation including: 

—Planning, designing, building and operating water resources 

and other civil works projects. (Navigation, Flood Control, Environmental Protection, Disaster Response, et cetera); 

—Designing and managing the construction of military facilities 

for the Army and Air Force. (Military Construction); and 

—Providing design and construction management support for 

other Defense and Federal agencies. (Interagency and International Services). 

The Energy and Water bill only funds the Civil Works missions 

of the Corps of Engineers. Approximately 23,000 civilians and 

about 190 military officers are responsible for this nationwide mission. 

From our hundreds of rivers, lakes, and wetlands to our thousands of miles of coastal shoreline, we are fortunate in America to 

enjoy an abundance of water resources. As a Nation, we value 

these resources for their natural beauty; for the many ways they 

help meet human needs; and for the fact that they provide habitat 

for thousands of species of plants, fish and wildlife. 

The Congress has given the Corps of Engineers the responsibility 

of helping to care for these important aquatic resources. 

Through its Civil Works program the Corps carries out a wide 

array of projects that provide: 

—Coastal storm damage reduction; 

—Disaster preparedness and response; 

—Environmental protection and restoration; 

—Flood damage reduction; 

—Hydropower; 

—Navigable waters; 

—Recreational opportunities; 
6 

—Regulatory oversight and 

—Water supply. 

One of the biggest challenges the Corps and other Government 

agencies face is finding the right balance among the often conflicting concerns our society has related to our water resources. Society wants these resources to help fuel economic growth (navigation, hydropower). Society wants them to provide social benefits 

(recreation). And finally society wants to be sure that they are 

available for future generations (environmental protection and restoration). 

The Corps is charged with seeking to achieve the best possible 

balance among these competing demands through an integrated approach to water resources management that focuses on regional solutions, involving an array of stakeholders (that is other Government agencies, environmental groups, businesses, and private organizations). In recent years, the Corps has implemented this approach largely by concentrating on watersheds. 

OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2010 BUDGET REQUEST

The fiscal year 2010 budget request for the Corps of Engineers 

is composed of $5,125,000,000 in new budget authority. This is an 

increase of $384,000,000 from the fiscal year 2009 request. The 

budget request is $277,000,000 less than the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount—the narrowest gap in recent memory. This is the 

first budget for the Corps of Engineers by this administration and 

the Committee sees definite improvements over the previous administrations proposals. However, much more needs to be done to 

truly change the paradigm under which Corps budgets seems to be 

produced within the executive branch. 

The Committee believes that the administration should seriously 

evaluate the Nation’s infrastructure needs and budget accordingly. 

At a time when this existing infrastructure, the foundation of our 

economic security and quality of life, is depreciating much faster 

than it is being recapitalized, when our increasing population is 

placing much greater stress on the Nation’s vital water resources, 

when shifts in population centers mean new and different problems 

and when a growing environmental awareness requires new solutions to persistent problems, this underfunding is unacceptable and 

threatens our continued well-being. Infrastructure budgets have 

got to be increased. If not, the Nation will continue to face unscheduled outages, damaged incomplete infrastructure and other emergency situations that must be dealt with through ever increasing 

emergency appropriations. 

This budget proposal again ignores studies and projects that are 

ongoing and funded in the Energy and Water section of the fiscal 

year 2009 omnibus that was agreed to by the Congress and signed 

into law by the President in favor of a select group of studies and 

projects that comport to budgetary criteria devised by the administration without any input from the public or the Congress. The 

Committee accepts that it is the prerogative of the administration 

to develop whatever criteria that it sees fit to utilize in order to decide which projects it will and will not fund. What this Committee 

does not accept is that the administration developed criteria is 
7 

somehow superior to and should supplant the investment decisions 

of Congress. 

The Committee agrees with some of the administration’s criteria. 

The Committee believes it is important to fund the capability level 

for dam safety projects. Likewise the Committee believes that it is 

a Federal obligation to fund mitigation and environmental compliance activities. Funding obligations under continuing contracts and 

projects that factor in the consideration of human safety are certainly laudable criteria for determining which projects to fund. 

However, the Committee differs with the administration concerning benefit to cost ratios being utilized to establish priority for 

funding. The Principles and Guidelines utilized by the Corps require the Chief of Engineers to develop the National Economic Development [NED] plan for a project. The NED plan, among other 

things, is distinguished by the fact that it provides the greatest excess benefits over the project costs. This is not the same thing as 

the highest benefit to cost [B/C] ratio. It is often the case that the 

NED plan and the plan with the highest B/C ratio are not the 

same plan. 

The Flood Control Act of 1936 established that project benefits 

should exceed projects costs. This has been the Corps’ longstanding 

water resource policy and attempts to change this legislative requirement have been unsuccessful. However, the administration 

has arbitrarily decided that benefits simply exceeding the costs is 

not a sufficient measure of a project’s worth. They have decided 

that they will only budget for projects that have benefit to cost ratios significantly greater than one to one. Unfortunately the B/C 

ratio has arbitrarily changed from year to year in order to accommodate the administrations desired level of investment. 

The criteria for deciding which studies to budget for appears to 

be even murkier than the criteria for determining which construction projects to fund. What is obvious is the result. Fewer studies 

are funded every year than are enacted in the previous appropriation act. These studies provide the information needed to make 

vital investments in our water resources infrastructure. However, 

they are de-emphasized in the budget request. One study, albeit an 

important one, consumes nearly 50 percent of the resources dedicated to studies across the country. 

As this Committee has noted in the past, planning in the Corps 

is a specialized skill set and once that ability is lost, it is difficult 

to re-establish. Most of the criticisms of the Corps’ project development process in recent years have centered on the planning process. The administration is providing funding for some improvements to the planning program such as funding the Planning Associates Program and Planning Centers of Expertise. However, planning studies have to be undertaken to utilize these improvements. 

The Committee believes that the Corps should have a robust planning program to not only address new water resource needs but to 

evaluate changes throughout the project development process. Continued budgets like this will lead to a complete loss of this vital 

Corps of Engineers’ competency. The administration should seriously revise their priorities for this account in the fiscal year 2011 

budget. 
8 

The Committee is pleased that the shifting of items from the 

Construction, General [CG] account to the Operation and Maintenance [O&M] account has not been all but abandoned by this administration. There is still roughly $47,067,000 of traditionally 

funded construction items contained in the fiscal year 2010 O&M 

account. The Committee believes this was just an oversight in 

preparation of the budget. These items are identified in a table in 

the section of this report dealing with the CG account. The budget 

request is shown in the O&M account and the funded amounts are 

included in the CG account. 

With these items shifted to their proper accounts, the CG ac- count total for the budget request would be $1,765,067,000 and the 

O&M budget request would be $2,456,933,000. This means that the 

administration’s CG request is down $376,610,000 from the fiscal 

year 2009 enacted amount and the O&M account shows a true increase of $255,033,000 from the fiscal year 2009 enacted. This increase to the O&M account is long overdue as this account has remained relatively stagnant this decade while personnel and material costs continue to increase. The Committee is pleased that the 

administration did not present the O&M budget in the ill-conceived 

regional budget groupings proposed for the last several years. The regulatory budget is $190,000,000 for fiscal year 2010. This is up about $7,000,000 from the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount. 

This increase is largely due to the increased workload from trying 

to implement regulatory requirements in light of the unclear 

Rapanos and SWANCC Supreme Court cases. 

The Committee is disappointed that funding for the Formerly 

Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] was cut by 

$6,000,000 from the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount of 

$140,000,000. This program was transferred to the Corps from the 

Department of Energy, because the Committee was concerned with 

management and cost issues of the program within the Energy Department. This is a program that is being well managed by the 

Corps and should have stable, adequate budget resources to continue these radiological clean-up activities. 

The Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account is proposed 

at $41,000,000 for fiscal year 2010. These funds are proposed for 

Corps readiness and preparedness activities of the Corps of Engineers. 

The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) 

is proposed as a separate account for $6,000,000. The Committee 

continues to believe that the Assistant Secretary’s office should be 

funded in the Defense appropriations bill. However, until such time 

as that can be reintegrated into that bill, the Committee agrees 

that the office should be funded as a separate account. The Assistant Secretary’s duties encompass much more than the civil works 

functions of the Corps of Engineers and the budget needs of the office should be addressed separately. 

The General Expenses [GE] account is proposed at $184,000,000 

for fiscal year 2010. While this is a little less than the inflation adjusted amount, the Committee is pleased to see the recognition that 

the oversight functions of the headquarters of the Corps should be 

strengthened. The Committee notes that the Corps operates one of 

the most efficient headquarters staffs in the National Capital re-
9 

gion. Only about 3.5 percent of their staffing is at their headquarters level as opposed to 10 percent or more for comparable 

agencies in the National Capital region. 

THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA] 

was an attempt to combat the recession by putting our citizens 

back to work rebuilding our Nation’s water resource infrastructure. 

The Committee was amazed that the Corps was not included in the 

administration’s original proposal. The Corps would have seemed 

to have been one of the first agencies that one would go to create 

jobs. However, after negotiations with the Congress, the administration agreed that funding for the Corps would be a component of 

the ARRA. The Corps was provided $4,600,000,000 to stimulate job 

growth by addressing needed water resource infrastructure needs. 

The Recovery Act gave the administration complete discretion as 

to which projects would be funded and how much funding each 

project would receive. The Congress provided general guidance expressing Congressional intent as to how the funds should be utilized. The President signed the ARRA on February 17, 2009, and 

by all accounts the Corps had internally developed a list of projects 

within about 30 days that met the Congress’ intent of creating jobs 

across the country while completing usable increments of projects 

or providing deferred maintenance to projects. One of the primary 

criteria that the Corps’ utilized in their project list was the ability 

to get the work underway quickly. After all, the goal was to quickly 

create jobs. However, on the eve of releasing this list, the administration decided to reevaluate the criteria that the Corps had internally used to develop its’ project list. This review took another 30 

days and by all accounts resulted in a drastically different list than 

what the Corps originally proposed—particularly in the CG account. In the Committee’s opinion, this additional administration 

review did not result in an improved list. In fact the Committee believes that it delayed execution of these funds and included projects 

that were not ‘‘shovel ready’’ but may have had other attributes the 

administration found compelling. 

The Committee found many of the funding choices made by the 

administration questionable. Again the internal criteria for making 

these decisions was developed without public input. Criteria was 

provided when the ultimate project lists were released, but some of 

the logic behind the decisions was tortured and hard to follow 

based on a straight reading of the administration’s criteria. The 

Committee was particularly disappointed that shore protection 

projects were deemed ineligible to receive funding from the ARRA. 

The Committee see these projects as being ‘‘shovel ready’’ and providing the same NED benefits to the Nation that any flood damage 

reduction project does. The Committee believes they should have 

been funded and encourages the administration to use unexpended 

ARRA funds for this legitimate Federal purpose. 

While the President was celebrating the initiation of the 1,000th 

transportation project funded by the ARRA, the Corps project list 

was still under administrative review. The first report on expenditures from the Corps was indicative of this extended review by 

showing virtually none of the funds expended more than 75 days 
10 

after enactment of the ARRA. We are now more than 4 months 

after enactment of the ARRA and are still seeing little progress on 

getting projects started. This should be unacceptable to the administration. It certainly is to this Committee. 

PERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING

While not calling this a performance-based budget, many of the 

same criteria seem to be at play in the decisionmaking process. The 

Committee hopes that the administration will try to work with 

Congress to try to find a better budget model as they begin the development process for the fiscal year 2011 budget. It is imperative 

that the Congress and the executive branch find common ground 

on investment decisions for water resource development if we are 

to effectively confront the numerous water resource issues that face 

the Nation. 

The Committee believes that Corps budgets should be developed 

from the bottom up, district to division to headquarters to ASA to 

OMB. District commanders should be responsible for developing 

and managing a program within their geographic area. Division 

commanders should be responsible for integrating the district office 

programs into a single division-wide program. The headquarters office should integrate the division programs into a single national 

program. The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army should 

assure that the program complies with administration policy and 

budgetary guidance and OMB develops the budgetary guidance and 

provides funding levels. Decisions for budgeting should be made 

within the framework of administration policy by those who know 

the projects and programs best, not Washington level bureaucrats. 

Unfortunately, if the ARRA is any guide, this will not be the case. 

BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS

As often happens with a change of administrations, the administration’s fiscal year 2010 budget request was delayed beyond the 

traditional first Monday in February release. This is to be expected. 

The President released his budget outline in March 2009, with the 

formal budget documents released on May 7, 2009. Inexplicably, 

the detailed budget justifications for the Corps of Engineers were 

not received until 5 weeks after the budget was released. The justifications that were provided only covered the GI, and CG accounts 

plus the remaining items in O&M. That means the administration 

provided no detailed justification for $2,400,000,000 of the Corps 

budget. This is unacceptable. This has now happened twice in the 

past 4 years. It is inconceivable to this Committee that DOE with 

a budget 5 times the size of the Corps can get printed and bound 

editions of their budget justification delivered on the day the budget is released and the Corps cannot even get their justifications on 

the Internet for 5 weeks after the budget is released. The administration should note that this situation will not be tolerated for the 

fiscal year 2011 budget. If every other executive branch agency can 

produce detailed budget justifications when the budget is released, 

the Corps should be able to also. 

The Committee appreciates the traditional layout of the justifications that were finally delivered. It was especially good to see that 

both the Flood Plain Management Services and Planning Assist-
11 

ance to States GI line items provided a detailed breakdown of the 

funding requests for these programs for the first time ever. Unfortunately, this level of detail was not included for the Continuing 

Authorities Program or the Dam Safety/Seepage Stability Correction Program. The justifications for these items showed a total dollar value and listed projects, but neither program justification gives 

the Committee an idea of how the program totals were arrived at. 

There is no way to know whether the administration proposal 

underfunds or overfunds these programs. 

The Committee believes that budget justifications serve to justify 

the administration’s request. The budget justifications should be 

improved by providing more relevant budget and project information. For fiscal year 2011 the Corps is directed to provide, at a minimum, detailed project information for each O&M project justifying 

the needs for each project. 

INLAND WATERWAY TRUST FUND

More than 3 years ago, this Committee was made aware of a 

pending shortfall in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. It took the 

previous administration 2 years from when they first notified the 

Committee of the issue to actually submit a proposal to Congress 

to address this shortfall. Unfortunately this proposed lockage fee 

was developed as a part of the fiscal year 2009 budget deliberations 

and, as such, the administration did not coordinate it with industry. When the proposal was announced it was loudly criticized by 

the navigation industry (who had no input into the proposal) and 

was largely considered dead on arrival. Unfortunately, the administration’s budget request assumed revenues from this lockage fee 

would be available to fund a portion of their fiscal year 2009 budget request. This put the Committee in the awkward position of trying to make the budget work with insufficient funds. 

When the fiscal year 2010 budget was presented to Congress, the 

budget repeated the proposal to phase out the existing fuel tax that 

funds the IWTF and phase in a lockage fee. Fortunately, the budget was not predicated on this proposal being enacted. The administration proposal only expends existing revenues available in the 

IWTF and deposits assumed revenues from the lockage fee into the 

IWTF to be used in subsequent years. This is a much more prudent 

way to budget with these limited funds. 

The Committee has supported and continues to support sharing 

the cost of construction and major rehabilitations between the 

IWTF and the General Treasury in the CG account. The Committee believes that this arrangement makes the users active partners in the overall inland waterway system and provides for a better more efficient system. As the Congress already pays 100 percent of the O&M costs of the inland waterway system, the Committee would not support a change in cost sharing for the IWTF. 

Even if it did support a cost share change, this would only prolong 

the inevitable bankrupting of the IWTF. 

The current fuel tax generates about $90,000,000 annually. Currently awarded continuing contracts for IWTF projects will require 

approximately $60,000,000 of this amount for the next 3 years. The 

Committee believes that the only way to solve the problem is to 

generate additional revenues in the fund. The current fuel tax is 
12 

spread relatively equitably across all commercial users of the inland waterway system. However, the fuel tax has remained at 

$0.20 per gallon of diesel fuel since 1996. Inflation and increased 

efficiency in tow boats has eroded the value of the fuel tax. One potential solution is to index the fuel tax to inflation. Another solution would be to keep the current fuel tax in place but to add a 

lock user fee to the revenue stream. This way, all users would pay 

something and those that use the locks would pay more. Other potential solutions that could be considered include a bulk commodity 

tax collected from the river terminals, a nationwide marine fuel 

tax, or even a national sales tax. A wholesale change from a fuel 

tax to a user fee as proposed by the administration appears to be 

unacceptable to Congress or the inland waterway industry. However, the Committee only proffers these as discussion topics. As waterways are the most efficient mode of transport any solution to the 

funding shortfall should not provide disincentives for using the inland waterways. 

Legislative text is again included this year to prohibit the Corps 

from entering into any new continuing contracts for any inland waterway project until the revenue stream for the IWTF is enhanced. 

The administration should submit the fiscal year 2011 budget 

based on expected revenues in the IWTF not based on projections 

based on legislation that may or may not happen. No change in law 

has been made nor will this Committee propose any to alleviate the 

funding problem in this fund. A solution to this problem must be 

developed with the users of the system, the Corps and the appropriate authorizing committees of the Congress. 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING

The budget for the Corps of Engineers consists of individual line 

items of projects. As presented by the President, the budget contains 969 specific line item requests for directed spending by the 

administration. Additional funding is requested by the administration for nationwide line items. All of these line items were specific 

requests by the administration of the Congress to be funded in fiscal year 2010. They did not request these funds programmatically, 

they requested them for a specific project in a specific location for 

a specific purpose. 

The Committee has returned to its tradition of including funding 

for the Corps of Engineers by account in legislative text and provided the details for each account within the report that accompanies the legislation. This provides the agency some flexibility in 

how funds are expended and allows the Corps to effectively manage 

their program while honoring the intent of Congress. The primary 

intent of Congress has always been that once the Congress funded 

a study, it intended for the study phase to be completed to determine if Federal investment is warranted. By the same token, once 

the Congress committed to initiation of construction of a project, it 

intended for the project to be completed and the national economy 

to accrue the project benefits. 

CONTINUING CONTRACTS AND REPROGRAMMING

The Committee expects the Chief of Engineers to execute the 

Civil Works program generally in accordance with congressional di-
13 

rection. This includes moving individual projects forward in accordance with the funds annually appropriated. However, the Committee realizes that many factors outside the Corps’ control may 

dictate the progress of any given project or study. 

The Committee is retaining the reprogramming guidance for fiscal year 2010 that was enacted for fiscal year 2009. The guidance 

is as follows: 

General Investigations.—For a base funding level less than 

$100,000, the reprogramming limit is $25,000. For a base level over 

$100,000, 25 percent up to a limit of $150,000 per study or activity. 

Amounts over this limit will require approval of the House and 

Senate Appropriations Committees, except that the Committee 

does not object to reprogramming up to $25,000 to any continuing 

study or activity that did not receive an appropriation in the current year. 

Construction, General.—For a base less than $2,000,000, the reprogramming limit is $300,000. For a base level over $2,000,000, 

15 percent up to a limit of $3,000,000 per project or activity. The 

Committee will allow reprogramming up to $3,000,000 for settled 

contractor claims, accelerated earnings or real estate deficiency 

judgments. Amounts over this limit require approval of the House 

and Senate Appropriations Committees. Reprogramming within 

each section of the Continuing Authorities is unlimited however, 

the percentages between studies and implementation must be 

maintained as directed in this report. Further, no reprogramming 

is allowed between sections nor into or out of the overall CG account. The Committee does not object to reprogramming of up to 

$300,000 to any continuing project or program that did not receive 

an appropriation in the current year. 

Operations and Maintenance.—Unlimited reprogramming authority is granted in order for the Corps to be able to respond to emergency situations. The Chief of Engineers must notify the House and 

Senate Appropriations Committees of these emergency actions as 

soon thereafter as practicable. For all other situations, for a base 

less than $1,000,000, the reprogramming limit is $150,000. For a 

base over $1,000,000, 15 percent up to a limit of $5,000,000 per 

project or activity. Amounts over this limit require approval of the 

House and Senate Appropriations Committees. The Committee 

does not object reprogramming up to $150,000 to any continuing 

project or program that did not receive an appropriation in the current year. 

Mississippi River and Tributaries.—The Corps should follow the 

same reprogramming guidelines for the GI, CG, and O&M portions 

of the Mississippi River and Tributaries account as listed above. 

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.—The Corps 

may reprogram up to 15 percent of the base of the receiving 

project. 

Continuing Authorities Program.—The reprogramming guidance 

does not apply to the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP]. The 

Corps has unlimited reprogramming within each section of the 

CAP but shall not reprogram funding from the CG account to any 

section of CAP or between CAP sections. 
14 

5-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET PLANNING

While the Committee appreciates the Corps’ attempts to provide 

a meaningful 5-year budget plan, it recognizes the inherent difficulties between the legislative and executive branches in preparing a 

useful plan. The executive branch is unwilling to project a 5-year 

horizon for projects for which they do not budget leaving a sizeable 

percentage of the Corps annual appropriations with a year-to-year 

event horizon for planning purposes. The fact that a sizeable portion of the annual appropriations are dedicated to congressional 

priorities is not a new phenomenon. Many major public works 

projects over the last two centuries have been funded on an annual 

basis without a clear budget strategy. The Committee would welcome the ideas and the opportunity to work with the executive 

branch to determine a mutually agreeable way to develop an integrated 5-year comprehensive budget that displays true funding 

needs for congressional as well as administration priorities. Anything less will only give a partial view of the investments needed 

in water resources infrastructure. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommendation includes a total of 

$5,405,000,000. This is $280,000,000 over the administration’s 

budget request and $2,635,000 above the fiscal year 2009 enacted 

amount. Funding is displayed in the following table. The first column represents the President’s budget as requested, the second column is displayed with the President’s request in the accounts 

where the projects have been traditionally located, the third column is the Senate Recommendation and the final column is the 

Senate recommendation versus the President’s request in the traditional account structure. Funding by account is as follows: 

Fiscal year 2010 

President’s budget 

Fiscal year 2010 

request 

Senate 

recommendation 

Request vs. 

recommendation 

General Investigations .................................. $100,000 $100,000 $170,000 $∂70,000 

Construction, General ................................... 1,718,000 1,765,067 1,924,000 ∂158,933 

Mississippi River and Tributaries ................ 248,000 248,000 340,000 ∂92,000 

Operation and Maintenance ......................... 2,504,000 2,456,933 2,450,000 ¥6,933 

Regulatory ..................................................... 190,000 190,000 190,000 ............................

Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies ...... 41,000 41,000 ............................ ¥41,000 

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program ......................................................... 134,000 134,000 140,000 ∂6,000 

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the 

Army (Civil Works) .................................... 6,000 6,000 5,000 ¥1,000 

General Expenses .......................................... 184,000 184,000 186,000 ∂2,000 

Total ................................................ 5,125,000 5,125,000 5,405,000 ∂280,000 

NEW STARTS

Out of the more than 2,100 requests this Committee received for 

Corps projects and studies for fiscal year 2010, 93 were for new 

study requests; 163 were for new construction projects. Of this 163, 

92 were for new water and sewer projects for the Corps. That is 

an astounding total of 12 percent of the Committee requests for 

new studies and projects. This is demonstrative of the tremendous 

need for water resource solutions across the Nation. Neither the 
15 

administration nor the Congress is able to find the budget resources to address these critical needs. 

The administration’s budget request proposed seven new construction starts and three new study starts in fiscal year 2010. 

These new construction starts account for $92,700,000 or 5.4 percent of the CG budget request for fiscal year 2010 and would require in excess of $800,000,000 in future appropriations to fund the 

obligations that would be incurred by starting these new projects. 

Starting these projects would only increase the pressure on the administration next year to establish budgetary criteria that would 

exclude more projects from funding consideration in order to fund 

these new priorities. 

While the Committee is recommending a boost to the construc- tion budget that is $158,900,000 above the budget request, this recommendation is $80,500,000 less than what was proposed in the 

Senate bill in fiscal year 2009. Further, the Committee’s CG recommendation is $217,700,000 below the fiscal year 2009 enacted 

CG amount. The Committee believes that recommending new 

starts in this budget environment would be imprudent. These new 

starts would get over the ‘‘new start’’ hurdle, only to face a budget 

that cannot accommodate all of these needs. One has to ask, is it 

more prudent to start a project, or to adequately fund those that 

have been started? 

The Committee has decided that there just are not sufficient resources to start any new studies or projects in the fiscal year 2010 

bill—either the administration’s new starts or those proposed by 

Congress. The Committee continues to believe that new starts are 

a vital part of the Corps’ program, there just are not sufficient 

funding resources to start new obligations at this time. If additional resources become available in conference, the Committee 

might re-evaluate this decision. 

DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS

The Committee received more than 2,000 requests for projects, 

programs, studies, or activities for the Corps of Engineers for fiscal 

year 2010. These requests included the budget request as well as 

requests by Members. The Committee obviously was unable to accommodate all of these requests. 

In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding provided in 

the energy and water bill, all disclosures are made in the report 

accompanying the bill. 

All of the projects funded in this report have gone through the 

same rigorous public review and approval process as those proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these projects, 

of course, is that the congressionally directed projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to decide what not to fund. 

There are two disclosure tables this year. One table discloses the 

recommended amounts that are in excess of those proposed in the 

budget request and the Members names that made these requests. 

If the Member requested the budget request or if only the budget 

request was provided, Member names are not listed next to these 

items because under the provisions of Rule 44 this would not be 

considered congressionally directed spending. The second table dis-
16 

closes only those earmarks requested by the President and the 

amount recommended or the budget request whichever is appropriate. 

The purposes for the funding provided in the various accounts is 

described in the paragraphs associated with each account. The location of the programs, projects, or studies are denoted in the account 

tables. 

GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $168,100,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 100,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 170,000,000 

1 Excludes emergency appropriations of $25,000,000. 

This appropriation funds studies to determine the need, engineering feasibility, economic justification, and the environmental 

and social suitability of solutions to water and related land resource problems; and for preconstruction engineering and design 

work, data collection, and interagency coordination and research 

activities. 

The planning program is the entry point for Federal involvement 

in solutions to the Nation’s water resource problems and needs. 

Unfortunately, the General Investigations [GI] account amount 

proposed in the budget is only marginally better that what has 

been proposed in previous budgets. Nationwide studies and programs consume almost half of the administration’s GI request. This 

budget is saying that the Nation should concentrate scarce resources on completing studies but not carrying forward ongoing 

studies. However, the budget request was able to carve out 

$700,000 for three new starts. While this Committee supports new 

study starts believing them a vital part of the planning program, 

the Committee does not support new starts when so many on-going 

studies are unfunded in the budget request. 

The Committee has provided for a robust and balanced planning 

program for fiscal year 2010. However, no new starts are included 

in this recommendation. To provide additional transparency in the 

budget process, the Committee has segregated the budget into 

three columns in the following table. 

The first column represents the reconnaissance phase of the 

planning process. These studies determine if there is a Federal interest in a water resource problem or need and if there is a cost 

sharing sponsor willing to move forward with the study. The next 

column represents the feasibility phase of the study. These detailed 

cost-shared studies determine the selected alternative to be recommended to the Congress for construction. The third column represents the preconstruction engineering and design phase. These 

detailed cost-shared designs are prepared while the project recommended to Congress is awaiting authorization for construction. 

The Committee hopes that by segregating the table in this manner that more attention will be focused on the various study 

phases, and a more balanced planning program will be developed 

by the administration. As the last two columns are generally cost 

shared, they demonstrate the commitment by cost-sharing sponsors 

to be a part of the Federal planning process. By the same token, 

it also shows the level of commitment of the Federal Government 
17 

to these cost-sharing sponsors. The Committee directs that the fiscal year 2011 planning budget be presented to the Committee in 

this fashion. 
18 

The budget request and the recommended Committee allowance 

are shown on the following table: 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

ALASKA 

HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK .............................. .................. .................. .................. 340 ..................

KOTZEBUE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK ........................... .................. .................. .................. 210 ..................

MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK ............................. 100 .................. .................. 100 ..................

VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK .................................. .................. .................. .................. .................. 385 

WHITTIER HARBOR, AK ................................................... .................. .................. .................. 340 ..................

YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK .................................................... 450 .................. .................. 450 ..................

ARIZONA 

PIMA COUNTY, AZ .......................................................... 275 .................. .................. 275 ..................

VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ ..... .................. 658 .................. .................. 658 

ARKANSAS 

LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR ....... .................. .................. .................. 250 ..................

MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR ..................................... .................. .................. .................. 425 ..................

PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR ............................................. .................. .................. .................. .................. 425 

SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS, AR ........................................... .................. .................. .................. 210 ..................

WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO ......... .................. .................. .................. 250 ..................

WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR ............. .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA ..... 900 .................. .................. 900 ..................

CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT 

STUDY ........................................................................ .................. .................. .................. 425 ..................

COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA ............................. .................. 950 .................. .................. 950 

COYOTE DAM, CA ........................................................... .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

GRAYSON AND MURDERER’S WALNUT CREEK BASIN, 

CA .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

HAMILTON CITY, CA ....................................................... .................. 400 .................. .................. 400 

HUMBOLT BAY LONG-TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, 

CA .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA ... .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERCOURSE, HEADWORKS, 

CA .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 230 ..................

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND 

VICINITY, .................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA .......................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 250 

MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, 

CA .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

MIDDLE CREEK, CA ........................................................ .................. .................. .................. .................. 250 

PAJARO RIVER, CA ......................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 425 

REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA ......................................... .................. .................. .................. 210 ..................

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA ....................................... .................. .................. .................. 221 ..................

SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, CA (SYSTEMS EVALU) ............................................................. .................. .................. .................. 425 ..................

SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA .... 468 .................. .................. 468 ..................

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA ...................................... .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA ............................. .................. .................. .................. 340 ..................

SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA ..................................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN [SJRB], FRAZIER CREEK/ 

STRATHMO ................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS, 

ORESTIMBA CR .......................................................... .................. .................. .................. 370 ..................

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN 

RIVER, CA .................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 640 ..................
19 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY 

CREEK, ....................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA .......................... .................. .................. .................. 425 ..................

SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA .............................. 278 .................. .................. 278 ..................

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA ....................... .................. .................. .................. 425 ..................

ST. HELENA-NAPA RIVER, CA ......................................... .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA ........................................ .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

SUTTER COUNTY, CA ...................................................... 339 .................. .................. 339 ..................

UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA ..................................... 386 .................. .................. 386 ..................

WESTMINSTER (EAST GARDEN GROVE) WATERSHED, 

CA .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

WEST SACRAMENTO, CA ................................................ .................. .................. .................. 950 ..................

COLORADO 

CACHE LA POUDRE, CO ................................................. .................. .................. .................. 50 ..................

SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO ......................................... .................. .................. 82 .................. ..................

CONNECTICUT 

CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, 

MA, NH & .................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 380 ..................

DELAWARE 

RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, 

DE .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 264 36 

FLORIDA 

FLAGER COUNTY, FL ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. 496 ..................

INDIAN RIVER LAGOON NORTH, FL ................................ 150 .................. .................. 150 ..................

LAKE WORTH INLET, FL .................................................. .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

LIDO KEY, SARASOTA, FL (SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL) .... .................. .................. .................. .................. 340 

MIAMI HARBOR, FL ........................................................ .................. .................. .................. .................. 510 

MILE POINT, FL (JACKSONVILLE) .................................... .................. .................. .................. 185 ..................

PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL .................................... 510 .................. .................. 510 ..................

WALTON COUNTY, FL ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 229 

GEORGIA 

AUGUSTA, GA ................................................................. .................. 278 .................. .................. 278 

OCMULGEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, 

GA .............................................................................. 100 .................. .................. .................. ..................

SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA ............................. .................. 1,000 .................. .................. ..................

SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, GA PH II ... .................. .................. .................. .................. 210 

TYBEE ISLAND, GA ......................................................... 206 .................. .................. 206 ..................

GUAM 

HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL ................................. 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

HAWAII 

ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI ............................................. 175 .................. .................. 408 ..................

KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, 

HI ............................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 300 ..................

MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI ......................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 202 

WAIAKEA-PALAI STREAMS, HI ......................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 300 

WALILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI ........................................ .................. .................. .................. 175 ..................

WEST MAUI FEASIBILITY STUDY, HI ............................... .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

ILLINOIS 

DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II) ................................ 500 .................. .................. 500 ..................

ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL ....................... 400 .................. .................. 400 ..................

INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES, MISSISSIPPI 

RIVER A ..................................................................... 300 .................. .................. 300 ..................
20 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL ........................ .................. .................. .................. .................. 50 

PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL ........................................... .................. .................. .................. 209 255 

S. FORK, SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, (BUBBLY 

CREEK), ..................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

UPPER MISS-ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & 

WI .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. .................. 9,000 

UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, 

MN & ......................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 640 ..................

INDIANA 

INDIANA HARBOR, IN ..................................................... .................. 300 .................. .................. 300 

IOWA 

CEDAR RIVER TIME CHECK AREA, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA .. .................. .................. .................. 750 ..................

HUMBOLT, IA .................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

KANSAS 

MANHATTAN, KS ............................................................. .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

TOPEKA, KS .................................................................... .................. 100 .................. .................. 250 

UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS ............................................ .................. .................. .................. .................. 170 

KENTUCKY 

GREEN RIVER WATERSHED, KY ...................................... 200 .................. .................. .................. ..................

LOUISIANA 

BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA .............................................. .................. 1,239 .................. .................. 1,239 

BOSSIER PARISH, LA ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. 150 ..................

CALCASIEU LOCK, LA ..................................................... 1,000 .................. .................. 1,000 ..................

CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA .................................. .................. .................. .................. 675 ..................

CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA ......................................... .................. .................. .................. 153 ..................

CROSS LAKE, LA ............................................................ .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, 

LA .............................................................................. 25,000 .................. .................. 23,000 ..................

LOUISIANA COASTAL PROTECTION & RESTORATION 

[LACPR], LA ............................................................... 3,000 .................. .................. 3,000 ..................

PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LA ............................................. .................. .................. .................. .................. 107 

PORT OF IBERIA, LA ....................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 1,000 

ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA ...... .................. .................. .................. 391 ..................

SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA ..................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 425 ..................

WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA ...................... .................. .................. .................. 425 ..................

MARYLAND 

ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMPREHENSIVE 

PLAN, MD ................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 321 ..................

BALTIMORE METRO WATER RESOURCES—PATAPSCO 

URBAN RIVER ............................................................ .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL 

MANAGEMENT, ........................................................... .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEME ...................................................... .................. .................. 143 57 ..................

EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD .. .................. 250 .................. .................. 483 

MIDDLE POTOMAC COMP PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC ... .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

MIDDLE POTOMAC WATERSHED, GREAT SENECA CREEK 

AND MUDDY ............................................................... .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT 

AND ENVIRO .............................................................. .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

MASSACHUSETTS 

BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA .................. .................. 500 .................. .................. 500 
21 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA ............. 100 .................. .................. 100 ..................

MICHIGAN 

GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, 

OH, PA ....................................................................... 400 .................. .................. 400 ..................

GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS [RAP], MI ....... .................. .................. .................. 850 ..................

LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, 

MI .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 215 ..................

MINNESOTA 

MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, MN ............................ .................. .................. .................. 215 ..................

MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD ........ 350 .................. .................. 350 ..................

WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, 

MN ............................................................................. 271 .................. .................. 271 ..................

MISSISSIPPI 

PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS ...................................... .................. .................. .................. 200 ..................

MISSOURI 

BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO .................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 242 

KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS ............................................... 224 .................. .................. 224 ..................

MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS ................... 600 .................. .................. 600 ..................

MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L455 & 

R460—471, MO ........................................................ .................. .................. .................. .................. 340 

RIVER DES PERES, MO .................................................. .................. .................. .................. .................. 100 

ST. LOUIS, MO (WATERSHED) ........................................ 400 .................. .................. .................. ..................

MONTANA 

YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT ............................ 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA ....... 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

NEW JERSEY 

DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ ........................ 290 .................. .................. 290 ..................

HUDSON—RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK 

MEADOWLANDS, NJ .................................................... 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

HUDSON—RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, 

NJ ............................................................................... 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ ............... .................. .................. .................. .................. 255

NEW JERSEY SHORE PROECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE 

MAY INLET ................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM 

NOURISHMENT ........................................................... .................. .................. .................. 110 ..................

PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ ..................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 215 

PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ ...................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 215 

PECKMAN RIVER BASIN, NJ ........................................... .................. .................. .................. 300 ..................

RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ ............................................. .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, 

NJ ............................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ .. .................. .................. .................. .................. 25 

RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION-BEACH, 

NJ ............................................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 110 

SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ .................. 511 .................. .................. 511 ..................

SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ ..................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 215 

STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ ................ .................. .................. .................. 110 ..................

NEW MEXICO 

ESPANOLA VALLEY, NM .................................................. .................. .................. .................. 150 ..................

RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX ................................ .................. .................. .................. 120 ..................
22 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

SANTA FE, NM ................................................................ .................. .................. .................. 228 ..................

NEW YORK 

BRONX RIVER BASIN, NY ............................................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY ......... 100 .................. .................. 100 ..................

HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY .......................... 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

HUDSON—RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ ........................ .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH NY ... 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY ......................................... .................. .................. .................. 441 ..................

MONTAUK POINT, NY ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 255 

NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED, NY .................................. .................. .................. 104 .................. ..................

ONONDAGA LAKE, NY ..................................................... .................. .................. .................. 215 ..................

UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, FLOODPLAIN 

RECONNECTION ......................................................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, LIVINGSTON 

MANOR, NY ................................................................ .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

NEVADA 

TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV ................................................ .................. .................. .................. .................. 10,000 

NORTH CAROLINA 

BOGUE BANKS, NC ......................................................... .................. .................. .................. 135 ..................

CURRITUCK SOUND, NC ................................................. 150 .................. .................. 150 ..................

NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC ............................................... .................. 200 .................. .................. 200 

NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC ................ .................. .................. 104 170 ..................

SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC ................ .................. .................. .................. 17 170 

NORTH DAKOTA 

MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO ............. .................. .................. .................. 5,500 ..................

RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD AND 

MANITOBA, ................................................................. 150 .................. .................. 3,050 ..................

OHIO 

HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH ............... .................. .................. .................. .................. 437

MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH ...... .................. .................. .................. .................. 640 

WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI .................... .................. .................. .................. 340 ..................

OKLAHOMA 

GRAND [NEOSHO] RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, 

KS .............................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 162 ..................

OOLOGAH LAKE WATERSHED, KS AND OK ..................... .................. .................. .................. 135 ..................

SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK ............................................ .................. .................. .................. 215 ..................

OREGON 

AMAZON CREEK, OR ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. 320 ..................

WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA ................ 203 .................. .................. 203 ..................

WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR ... .................. .................. .................. 215 ..................

WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR ..... .................. 240 .................. .................. 240 

PENNSYLVANIA 

BLOOMSBURG, PA .......................................................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN, PINE KNOT, PA ...................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, 

PA, DE & ................................................................... .................. .................. 81 85 ..................

SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON, PA ............... .................. .................. .................. 214 ..................

UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA ............................ .................. .................. .................. 1,700 ..................

SOUTH CAROLINA 

EDISTO ISLAND, SC ........................................................ 167 .................. .................. 167 ..................
23 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

REEDY RIVER, SC .......................................................... .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

SOUTH DAKOTA 

JAMES RIVER, SD & ND ................................................. .................. .................. .................. 200 ..................

WATERTOWN AND VICINITY, SD ..................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. 448 

TENNESSEE 

MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN ....... 50 .................. .................. 50 ..................

TEXAS 

ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN—ELM CREEK) ..... .................. .................. .................. 190 ..................

BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, 

TX .............................................................................. 526 .................. .................. 526 ..................

DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX .. .................. .................. .................. 2,125 ..................

FREEPORT HARBOR, TX ................................................. 675 .................. .................. 675 ..................

GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, TX ................................................................. 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX ....... 423 .................. .................. 423 ..................

LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX ............................. 425 .................. .................. 425 ..................

NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX ........................... 250 .................. .................. 250 ..................

RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX ................................................. 304 .................. .................. 304 ..................

SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX .................................... .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX .......................... 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX ........ .................. .................. .................. 143 ..................

VERMONT 

MONTPELIER, VT ............................................................ .................. .................. .................. 239 ..................

VIRGINIA 

CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA ..................................... .................. .................. .................. 130 ..................

CHOWAN RIVER BASIN, VA ............................................ .................. .................. .................. 215 ..................

DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA ......... .................. .................. .................. 78 ..................

FOUR MILE RUN, VA ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. 100 ..................

GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA .................... .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SECTION 216) .................................................................. 300 .................. .................. 300 ..................

LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA ....................................... 112 .................. .................. 112 ..................

NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA .................................... .................. .................. .................. 90 ..................

UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II) .............. .................. .................. .................. 170 ..................

VICINITY OF WILLOUGHBY SPIT, VA ............................... .................. .................. .................. 243 ..................

WASHINGTON 

CENTRALIA, WA .............................................................. .................. .................. .................. 1,000 ..................

CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA .......................................... .................. .................. .................. 1,000 ..................

ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, WA ............................................ .................. .................. .................. 255 ..................

LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, 

WA & OR ................................................................... 300 .................. .................. 300 ..................

PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, WA ........................................................... 400 .................. .................. 400 ..................

PUYALLUP RIVER, WA .................................................... 250 .................. .................. 250 ..................

SKAGIT RIVER, WA ......................................................... .................. .................. .................. 550 ..................

SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA ....................................... .................. .................. .................. 300 ..................

STILLAGUAMISH RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA .................. .................. .................. .................. 130 

WEST VIRGINIA 

CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV ............................................ .................. .................. .................. 600 ..................

OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, 

OH, PA ....................................................................... .................. .................. .................. 2,000 ..................

UPPER GUYANDOTTE, WV ............................................... .................. .................. .................. 300 ..................
24 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

WELLS LOCK AND DAM, LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV 

(LITTLE K) .................................................................. .................. .................. .................. 40 ..................

SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS ................................ 44,468 6,115 514 85,028 32,439 

NATIONAL PROGRAMS 

COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES .......... .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................

ACCESS TO WATER DATA (TECH ASSIST) ...................... 750 .................. .................. 750 ..................

COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ... 100 .................. .................. 100 ..................

OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS ................................ 4,330 .................. .................. 4,730 ..................

LAKE TAHOE ................................................................... (100 ) .................. .................. (500 ) ..................

PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES: 7,000 .................. .................. 8,051 ..................

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, 

AZ ..................................................................... (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CA ................................... (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

CITY OF PALMDALE, CA ........................................ (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA ................................... (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

SAN BERNADINO COUNTY, CA .............................. (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

SAN MANUEL BAND OF INDIANS, CA .................... (66 ) .................. .................. (66 ) ..................

SOBOBA BAND OF INDIANS, CA ............................ (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

WEST CANAL/WILLOW BROOK FLOOD MANAGEMENT STU ......................................................... (20 ) .................. .................. (20 ) ..................

DELAWARE ESTUARY SALINITY MONITORING 

STUDY, .............................................................. .................. .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

SOUTH BETHANY TIDAL PUMP SYSTEM STUDY, 

DE ..................................................................... (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

EFFINGHAM COUNTY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ....................................................... (60 ) .................. .................. (60 ) ..................

NORTHWEST GA WATERSHEAD, GA ....................... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

HAWAII DOT GIS, HI .............................................. .................. .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

HAWAII WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, HI .... .................. .................. .................. (270 ) ..................

RAINFALL ATLAS OF HAWAII, STATE OF HAWAII 

AN ..................................................................... .................. .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

WAIMANALO WASTEWATER EFFLUENT REUSE 

PLAN, ST ........................................................... .................. .................. .................. (67 ) ..................

STATE OF HAWAII GENERAL FLOOD CONTROL 

PLAN U ............................................................. .................. .................. .................. (1,000 ) ..................

BOYER RIVER, MISSOURI VALLEY, IA ................... .................. .................. .................. (36 ) ..................

NISHNABOTNA WATERSHED, IA ............................. (341 ) .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

WILLOW CREEK, IA ................................................ (45 ) .................. .................. (45 ) ..................

BIG WOOD RIVER—BELVUE ................................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ..................

IDAHO, ID .............................................................. (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

WEISER R. FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS, ID .................. (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

LAKE COUNTY WETLANDS RESTORATION, IL ......... .................. .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

KS RIVER WATER RESOURCES, KS ....................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

PAS TRIBAL SUPPORT, KS ..................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

BARDSTOWN, KY ................................................... (88 ) .................. .................. (88 ) ..................

LOUISVILLE PARKS, KY .......................................... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

CHITIMACHA WATERSHED PLANNING, LA .............. (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

NEW ORLEANS RIVER PARK, LA ............................ (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

PORT OF LAKE CHARLES MASTER PLAN, LA ......... (125 ) .................. .................. (125 ) ..................

RIVER PARISHES PEDESTRIAN PLAN, LA .............. (125 ) .................. .................. (125 ) ..................

ST. JOHNS PARISH MONUMENTATION, LA ............. (125 ) .................. .................. (125 ) ..................

TUNICA RECREATION TRAIL, TUNICA-BILOXI 

TRIBE ................................................................ (125 ) .................. .................. (125 ) ..................

PENN’S HILL DRAINAGE STUDY, QUINCY, MA ....... (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

TOWN LINE BROOK DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT, 

MALDEN, ........................................................... (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD ................................. (20 ) .................. .................. (20 ) ..................
25 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

MACOMB COUNTY DRAIN MAPPING & DATABASE, 

MI ..................................................................... (200 ) .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

STREAM CHARACTERISTICS STUDY FOR 

SAGANING RI .................................................... (80 ) .................. .................. (80 ) ..................

CHOCTAW COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS ..................... .................. .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

CAPE GIRARDEAU GROUNDWATER STUDY, MO ..... (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

CITY OF MARQUAND FLOOD STUDY, MO ............... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

PAS MO MDNR NORTHWEST MISSOURI, MO ......... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

PERUQUE CREEK WATER QUALITY, MO ................ (30 ) .................. .................. (30 ) ..................

ST. CHARLES RIVERFRONT MICRO-MODEL, MO .... (90 ) .................. .................. (90 ) ..................

HENRY R. DAM, BURKE, CO., NC ......................... (48 ) .................. .................. (48 ) ..................

GOOCHS MILLL, GRNADVILLE, CO., NC ................. (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

FONTENELLE/BELLEVUE, NE .................................. (40 ) .................. .................. (40 ) ..................

SPICKET RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH .............. (55 ) .................. .................. (55 ) ..................

GRANTS DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN, NM ....... (56 ) .................. .................. (56 ) ..................

TARRYTOWN, NY .................................................... (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

TOWN OF CLARENCE, NY ...................................... (80 ) .................. .................. (80 ) ..................

WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY ........................................ (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

HARPERSFIELD DAM, GRAND RIVER, OH .............. (88 ) .................. .................. (88 ) ..................

STATE OF OHIO GIS, OH ........................................ (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

OKLAHOMA COMP WATER PLAN, OK ..................... .................. .................. .................. (500 ) ..................

PAS BOONE NUTE SLOUGH, OR ............................ (27 ) .................. .................. (27 ) ..................

PAS CITY OF MEDFORD FLOODPLAIN, OR ............. (60 ) .................. .................. (60 ) ..................

PAS NEHALEM RIVER ODOT FLOOD MAPPING, 

OR ..................................................................... (200 ) .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

PAS PORTLAND BALANCED CUT AND FILL STUDY, 

OR ..................................................................... (35 ) .................. .................. (35 ) ..................

PAS TOUTLE RIVER RADIO TRACKING, OR ............ (30 ) .................. .................. (30 ) ..................

ALLEGHENY CO AQUATIC ASSESSMENT STUDY, 

PA ..................................................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

NORTHERN ALLEGHENY CO STORMWATER MANGT 

STUDY ............................................................... (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING, PA (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SW PA SPILL RESPONSE STUDY, PA ..................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

USS YORKTOWN, SC .............................................. (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

KINGSPORT RIVERFRONT, TN ................................ (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

TN DEPT OF ENV AND CONSERV PILOT STUDY— 

WTR .................................................................. (200 ) .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

CHARLOTTESVILLE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT, VA .......................................................... (40 ) .................. .................. (40 ) ..................

JAMES CITY SURRY NON-STRUCTURAL, VA .......... (35 ) .................. .................. (35 ) ..................

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COASTAL 

COMM ............................................................... .................. .................. .................. (220 ) ..................

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

VA ..................................................................... (114 ) .................. .................. (114 ) ..................

WILLIAMSBURG STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, 

VA ..................................................................... (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT ....................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

CLOVER ISLAND—PORT OF KENEWICK, WA ......... (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

ELWHA RIVER, WA ................................................. (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

HALF MOON LAKE ALUM DOSING STUDY, WI ........ (30 ) .................. .................. (30 ) ..................

INTERNAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING ASSESSMENT 

STUDY ............................................................... (31 ) .................. .................. (31 ) ..................

ONEIDA NATION FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION, WI .... (250 ) .................. .................. (250 ) ..................

CITY OF RAVENWOOD, WV .................................... (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

PUTNAM COUNTY DRAINAGE, WV .......................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 

AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT TRICADD ......................................................................... 350 .................. .................. 350 ..................
26 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION ................................ 1,400 .................. .................. 6,000 ..................

COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM .............. .................. .................. .................. (1,000 ) ..................

PACIFIC ISLAND LAND OCEAN TYPHOON EXPERIMENT ................................................................ .................. .................. .................. (1,000 ) ..................

SURGE AND WAVE ISLAND MODELING STUDIES, 

HI ...................................................................... .................. .................. .................. (1,250 ) ..................

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES ........................... 75 .................. .................. 75 ..................

FLOOD DAMAGE DATA .................................................... 220 .................. .................. 220 ..................

FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES ......................... 8,000 .................. .................. 13,200 ..................

MOBILE DISTRICT HURRICANE EVACUATION 

STUDIES ............................................................ (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

SPECIAL STUDY—CROWDABOUT CREEK, AL ........ (81 ) .................. .................. (81 ) ..................

SS—SFHE MONTGOMERY AL, LITTLE SANDY 

CREEK, .............................................................. (40 ) .................. .................. (40 ) ..................

SS—BEAVER/CLEAR CREEKS, CAMP VERDE, AZ (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SS—COCHISE COUNTY, AZ .................................. (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SS—GILA RIVER/DUNCAN, AZ .............................. (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SS—HOPI TRIBE FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, AZ ........ (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SS—TOHONO O’ODHAM GU VO WASH, AZ ........... (95 ) .................. .................. (95 ) ..................

SS—TOHONO O’ODHAM NATIONWIDE FLOODPLAIN ................................................................ (250 ) .................. .................. (250 ) ..................

HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CA TSUNAMI PAS, CA ......... (500 ) .................. .................. (500 ) ..................

RAYMOND BASIN CONJUNCTIVE USE DROUGHT 

STUDY ............................................................... (125 ) .................. .................. (125 ) ..................

SAN MATEO COUNTY, CA LEVEE SURVEY, CA ...... (30 ) .................. .................. (30 ) ..................

SS—ANAVERDE CREEK FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION, ................................................................. (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SS—SOBOBA BAND OF INDIANS FLOOD MAPPING, ................................................................. (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

CARBON COUNTY, CO ........................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

DURANGO, LAPLATA COUNTY, CO ......................... (60 ) .................. .................. (60 ) ..................

GREEN RIVER CITY, CO ........................................ (80 ) .................. .................. (80 ) ..................

LA PLATA COUNTY, CO .......................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

MESA COUNTY, CO ................................................ (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

FLOOD/HURRICANE EVACUATION, DC ................... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

WHITE CLAY CREEK, NEW CASTLE, DE ................. .................. .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

SAVANNAH DISTRICT HURRICANE EVAC STUDIES, 

G ....................................................................... (40 ) .................. .................. (40 ) ..................

SS—GA CLARKSVILLE STREAM SURVEY, GA ........ (20 ) .................. .................. (20 ) ..................

ANAHOLA FLOOD HAZARD STUDY, KAUAI, HI ........ (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

HAWAII TECHNICAL SERVICES, HI ......................... .................. .................. .................. (40 ) ..................

HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, HAWAII .......... .................. .................. .................. (1,000 ) ..................

KALUANUI STREAM FLOOD HAZARD DETERMINATION, ................................................................. (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

NUUANU RESERVOIR FLOOD STUDY, HI ................ (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

WAIMEA RIVER ZONE A FLOOD DETERMINATION, 

KA ..................................................................... (185 ) .................. .................. (185 ) ..................

WAIOHULI GULCH FLOOD HAZARD STUDY, KULA, 

MA .................................................................... (200 ) .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

IOWA MULTI-STATE DAM SAFETY ANALYSES, IA ... .................. .................. .................. (37 ) ..................

LITTLE SIOUX WATERSHED, IA .............................. .................. .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

MON-MAQ DAM REMOVAL STUDY & LOCAL 

FLOODPLAIN ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. (120 ) ..................

SS—EVALUATION OF FLOODING SCENARIOS, IA .. (120 ) .................. .................. (120 ) ..................

SS—REGULATED FREQUENCY CURVES ................ (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

SS BOULDER CREEK DONNELLY, ID ..................... (35 ) .................. .................. (35 ) ..................

SS WARM SPRINGS CREEK VIC OF CHALLIS, ID ... (38 ) .................. .................. (38 ) ..................

SS WARM SPRINGS CREEK VIC OF KETCHUM, 

ID ...................................................................... (45 ) .................. .................. (45 ) ..................
27 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

SS—IL LEVEES EVALUATION SUPPORT, IL ........... (250 ) .................. .................. (250 ) ..................

WILL COUNTY SURVEY, IL ..................................... (400 ) .................. .................. (400 ) ..................

NODAWAY COUNTY BRIDGE STUDY, KS ................ (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LA, [GIS] .......................... .................. .................. .................. (250 ) ..................

CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, LA [GIS] ............................. .................. .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [GIS] ................. .................. .................. .................. (1,200 ) ..................

HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDY, SE LOUISIANA 

UP ..................................................................... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [GIS] ............................... .................. .................. .................. (350 ) ..................

SS—CITY OF GRETNA GIS, LA .............................. (200 ) .................. .................. (200 ) ..................

SS—EAST BATON ROUGE GIS, LA ........................ (450 ) .................. .................. (450 ) ..................

SS—LIVINGSTON PARISH GIS, LA ......................... (650 ) .................. .................. (650 ) ..................

CLAY PIT BROOK FLOODING STUDY, MA ............... (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

HOOSIC RIVER FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY, 

CHESHI ............................................................. (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

SAW MILL BROOK FLOOD STUDY, NEWTON, MA ... (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

SPEAR BROOK FLOOD CONTROL STUDY, 

WILBRAHAM, ..................................................... (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, MD ................ (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

AUTRAIN RIVER SCOUR STUDY, MI ....................... (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT TRAINING, MO ........... (30 ) .................. .................. (30 ) ..................

SS—LINCOLN COUNTY, MO .................................. (150 ) .................. .................. (150 ) ..................

JORDAN, MT .......................................................... (80 ) .................. .................. (80 ) ..................

NASHUA FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT, MT ............... (55 ) .................. .................. (55 ) ..................

NORTH CAROLINA HES RESTUDY, NC ................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

BEAVER & BLACK BROOKS FLOODING STUDY, 

LOND ................................................................. (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

FLOODPLAIN MAPS FOR MANALAPAN AND 

MATCHAPON ...................................................... .................. .................. .................. (500 ) ..................

SS—MANALAPAN BROOK, NJ ................................ (110 ) .................. .................. (110 ) ..................

ELBOW CREEK, NY ................................................ (60 ) .................. .................. (60 ) ..................

FORECAST STUDIES, NY ........................................ (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, NY ................ (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

ONONDAGA CREEK, SYRACUSE, NY ...................... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SPECIAL STUDY—FINGER LAKES, NY ................... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

NEW JERSEY—PORT AUTHORITY STUDY UPDATE, 

N ....................................................................... (180 ) .................. .................. (180 ) ..................

SPECIAL STUDY—CRAWFORD COUNTY, OH ......... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SS CITY OF JOHN DAY, OR ................................... (160 ) .................. .................. (160 ) ..................

SS CROOKED RIVER FIS (CITY OF PRINEVILLE), ... (140 ) .................. .................. (140 ) ..................

SS JUNIPER CANYON FIS (CITY OF PRINEVILLE), (137 ) .................. .................. (137 ) ..................

SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #1 (GRAY’S RIVER), OR .. (155 ) .................. .................. (155 ) ..................

SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #2 (ELOCHOMAN RIVER), 

OR ..................................................................... (130 ) .................. .................. (130 ) ..................

SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #3 (WILSON CREEK), 

OR ..................................................................... (128 ) .................. .................. (128 ) ..................

SS WAHKIAKUM CO FIS #4 (SKAMOKAWA CREEK), 

OR ..................................................................... (128 ) .................. .................. (128 ) ..................

PHILADELPHIA HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDY, 

P ....................................................................... (10 ) .................. .................. (10 ) ..................

SOUTHEASTERN, PA .............................................. (250 ) .................. .................. (250 ) ..................

PUERTO RICO HES BEHAVIOR STUDY, PR ............ (112 ) .................. .................. (112 ) ..................

SOUTH CAROLINA HES RESTUDY, SC ................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

SS—CITY OF GALLATIN, TN .................................. (85 ) .................. .................. (85 ) ..................

UNINCORPARATED WEBER CO., UT ....................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

CITY OF GALAX, VA ............................................... (100 ) .................. .................. (100 ) ..................

SS—TOWN OF ABINGDON, VA .............................. (56 ) .................. .................. (56 ) ..................

DAM BREAK STUDIES, VT ...................................... (31 ) .................. .................. (31 ) ..................

EAST LONG POND DAM, VT ................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

LAKE HARDWICK DAM, VT ..................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................
28 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED 

MACKVILLE POND DAM, VT ................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

NICHOLS POND DAM, VT ....................................... (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

RUGG BROOKS, ST. ALBANS CITY, VT .................. (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

SS—STEVENS BROOKS, TOWN OF ST. ALBANS, 

VT ..................................................................... (75 ) .................. .................. (75 ) ..................

SS—VERMONT, VT ................................................ (25 ) .................. .................. (25 ) ..................

WARREN LAKE DAM, VT ........................................ (50 ) .................. .................. (50 ) ..................

SS LIND COULEE, VICINITY OF LIND, WA .............. (35 ) .................. .................. (35 ) ..................

SS MCCOY CREEK, VICINITY OF OAKESDALE, 

WA .................................................................... (67 ) .................. .................. (67 ) ..................

BEAR RIVER STUDY—UINTA CO., WY .................. (140 ) .................. .................. (140 ) ..................

HYDROLOGIC STUDIES ................................................... 250 .................. .................. 250 ..................

INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES ................................... 200 .................. .................. 200 ..................

PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE) ............................................................................ 225 .................. .................. 225 ..................

REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT ............................................................ 150 .................. .................. 150 ..................

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS ... 50 .................. .................. 50 ..................

STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY) ............... 600 .................. .................. 600 ..................

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ........................................... 350 .................. .................. 350 ..................

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..................................... 16,892 .................. .................. 25,392 ..................

SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION, MD .............. .................. .................. .................. (1,000 ) ..................

URBAN FLOOD DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, DRI, 

NV ..................................................................... .................. .................. .................. (2,500 ) ..................

OTHER—MISC 

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ............................................ 2,000 .................. .................. 2,000 ..................

INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW ......................................... 1,000 .................. .................. 1,000 ..................

NATIONAL SHORELINE .................................................... 375 .................. .................. 750 ..................

PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM ...................................... 2,100 .................. .................. 2,100 ..................

TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM ................................... 1,000 .................. .................. 1,000 ..................

WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY ........................ 2,000 .................. .................. .................. ..................

SUBTOTAL, NATIONAL PROGRAMS .................... 49,417 .................. .................. 69,223 ..................

TOTAL ................................................................ 93,885 6,115 514 154,251 32,439 

SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE ................................................. .................. .................. .................. ¥17,224 ..................

GRAND TOTAL ................................................... 100,000 .................. .................. 170,000 ..................

Homer Harbor Modification, Alaska.—The Committee recommends $340,000 to continue feasibility studies. A new harbor 

basin would not only reduce existing overcapacity and congestion, 

but would also enable Port and Harbor of Homer to accommodate 

the growth in the use of Homer by the commercial fleet. 

Valdez Harbor Expansion, Alaska.—The Committee recommendation includes $385,000 for preconstruction engineering 

and design studies. Rafting during the commercial fishing season 

has been reported up to eight boats deep on a regular basis. The 

problem is highly seasonal, requiring a large need for transient 

space primarily during the summer months. 

Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study, California.— 

The Committee recommends $425,000 for this feasibility study. The 

State of California has requested that the Corps update the original Sacramento-San Joaquin Basin Comprehensive Study. These 
29 

studies will be muted to prepare a comprehensive system approach 

to flood management for the Central Valley. 

Riverside County SAMP and San Diego County SAMP, California.—The Committee recommendation includes funding to complete these Special Area Management Plans. The SAMPs will result in a streamlined section 404 process, which will generate general and individual permits. 

West Sacramento, California.—The Committee recommendation 

includes $950,000 to continue the general re-evaluation of the levee 

system. 

Red Clay Creek, Christina River Watershed, Delaware.—The 

Committee recommends $264,000 for the final screening of alternatives, selection of recommended plan of improvement, preparation of draft EA, and completion of draft feasibility report, $36,000 

is recommended to initiate preconstruction engineering and design. 

Miami Harbor Channel, Florida.—The Committee recommendation includes $510,000 to continue studies of the harbor deepening. 

Walton County, Florida.—The Committee recommendation includes $229,000 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design 

activities. This project is a test bed for the Institute of Water Resources Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction model. 

Ocmulgee River Basin Watershed Management, Georgia.—The 

Committee has recommended no funding for this administration 

new study start. 

Savannah Harbor Expansion, Georgia.—The Committee recommendation has included funds for this project under the Construction General Heading. The Construction Phase was initiated 

in the fiscal year 2009 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act. 

Prairie Dupont Levee, Illinois.—The Committee recommends 

$209,000 for the feasibility study to assess the potential for reconstruction of deteriorated features such as gates and culverts. The 

recommendation also includes $255,000 for the deficiency correction preconstruction engineering and design studies to investigate 

solutions such as rehabilitation/replacement of existing relief wells 

and the construction of additional relief wells. 

Upper Mississippi River—Illinois Waterway Navigation System, 

Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.—The Committee recommendation includes $9,000,000 for continuation of 

preconstruction engineering and design studies. The Committee 

recognizes the need to modernize this more than 60-year-old navigation system and has provided continued funding for both structural design and environmental restoration work. 

Green River Watershed, Kentucky.—The Committee has recommended no funding for this new study star proposed by the administration. 

Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration, Louisiana.—The 

Committee recommends $23,000,000 for these important studies. 

The Committee notes that the Science activities are included within the overall line item rather than being budgeted separately. 

The reduction made to these studies should not be viewed as any 

diminution of support for these efforts, rather it is an attempt to 

balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program among the 

various missions of the Corps. 
30 

Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Project [LACPR], 

Louisiana.—The Committee recommendation includes $3,000,000 

to refine and integrate LACPR findings and outputs regarding alternative trade-offs, and coastal landscape contributions to risk 

management, with ongoing Hurricane Storm Damage Reduction 

projects and Coastal Protection and Restoration projects and to delineate comprehensive plans for higher levels of storm surge risk 

reduction. 

Chesapeake Bay, Susquehanna Reservoir Sediment Management, 

Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.—It has been estimated that 

280 million tons of sediment originating from the Susquehanna 

River watershed are trapped behind the four hydroelectric dams located on the Lower Susquehanna River between Havre de Grace, 

Maryland, and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Three of the four dams 

Holtwood, Safe Harbor, and York Haven have reached steady state. 

It is estimated that the Conowingo Dam will cease to have trapping 

capacity in 15 to 20 years. Once this last reservoir reaches steady 

state, the sediment input to the bay may increase dramatically. 

The Committee recommendation includes $143,000 to complete the 

reconnaissance study to examine the impact of the Lower Susquehanna River Dams on sediment transport into the Bay and $57,000 

to initiate feasibility studies. 

St. Louis Watershed, Missouri.—The Committee has recommended no funding for this new study star proposed by the administration. 

Upper Delaware River Watershed, Livingston Manor, New 

York.—The Committee recommendation includes $170,000 to continue flood control studies along the Delaware River. 

Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota, North Dakota, South 

Dakota and Manitoba.—The Committee recommendation includes 

$3,050,000 to continue various flood damage reduction studies in 

North Dakota and Minnesota. In the Fargo, North Dakota/Moorhead, Minnesota area alone the Red River has exceeded flood stage 

in 51 of the past 107 years and every year from 1993 through 2009. 

Studies are ongoing under this authority in the Fargo-Moorhead 

Metro area, Pembina, North Dakota, the Fargo upstream area and 

additional studies of the Sheyenne River will be undertaken to 

evaluate solutions to the 2009 spring flood. 

James River, South Dakota and North Dakota.—The Committee 

has recommended $200,000 to evaluate solutions to flooding conditions in the James River Basin due to the spring 2009 flood. 

Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Virginia.—The Committee 

recommendation includes $255,000 to initiate feasibility studies to 

address several problems articulated by the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality and the Department of Game and Inland 

Fisheries including benthic impairments, low dissolved oxygen concentrations, elevated nutrient levels, and cold and warm water 

fisheries in the James River below the lake. 

Vicinity of Willoughby Spit, Norfolk, Virginia.—The Committee 

recommends $243,000 to complete the General Reevaluation Study. 

Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, Washington.—The Committee recommendation includes $1,000,000 to continue 

preconstruction engineering and design efforts to reduce the risk of 

flooding to the Interstate 5 corridor. Significant flooding in 2007 
31 

and 2009 resulted in heavy damages to urban and rural areas of 

the Chehalis Basin and closed I–5 for a total of 6 days. 

Chehalis River Basin, Washington.—The Committee recommends 

$1,000,000 for plan formulation for a Feasibility decision document, 

conduct a Feasibility Scoping meeting and initiate the alternatives 

analysis for ecosystem and flood risk management studies. It is the 

Committee’s understanding that Grays Harbor has recently indicated they would like to pursue increasing the scope of the study 

to include flood risk management. 

Planning Assistance to States.—The Committee recommendation 

includes $8,051,000 for this nationwide cost-shared program. The 

Committee recognizes that there are hundreds of these studies ongoing at any given time. The Committee has provided a listing in 

the table of projects that should be given priority if cost-sharing 

funds are available from the local sponsors. However, the Corps 

should view these amounts as guides and reprogram funds as appropriate to move these studies forward as rapidly as possible. 

Coastal Field Data Collection.—The Committee has recommended $6,000,000 for this nationwide program. In addition to 

budgeted funds of $1,400,000, $4,600,000 has been recommended to 

continue the Coastal Data Information Program; Surge and Wave 

Island Modeling Studies, Hawaii; and the Pacific Island Land 

Ocean Typhoon Experiment Program. The Wave Data Study should 

also be continued within this overall funding amount. The Committee has included a portion of the climate change funding from 

the O&M account to this line item to ensure that this data collection effort continues. As a majority of our population lives within 

50 miles of the coast it is prudent to invest in these data collection 

activities to be able to evaluate how sea level rise will affect all of 

our coastal areas. Recent studies have shown, for instance, that sea 

level rise will affect the Atlantic Coast unequally with the Chesapeake Bay area being impacted more than the northern and southern portions of the Atlantic Coast. However, the Atlantic and Gulf 

Coasts of 2100 will likely look much different than they do today. 

The Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States Report 

(www.globalchange.gov/usimpacts) released by the White House in 

May 2009 shows the impacts to our coastal environments if even 

a moderate sea level rise of 2–4 feet occurs over the next 100 years. 

Planning needs to be accelerated to determine how sea level rise 

will be accommodated. This may involve an orderly retreat from 

some of the lowest areas of the coast over a period of years. Coastal 

protection projects will continue to be vital to protecting our population, but the policy question that must be answered is should all 

of our coastal areas be protected and at what cost. 

Flood Plain Management Services Program.—The Committee recommendation includes $13,200,000. The Committee has provided a 

listing in the table of projects that should be given priority if cost 

sharing funds are available from the local sponsors. However, the 

Corps should view these amounts as guides and reprogram funds 

as appropriate to move these studies forward as rapidly as possible. 

Research and Development.—The Committee has recommended 

$25,392,000 for the Corps nationwide research and development 

programs. The Committee believes that this is an important area 

of the Corps’ program that should be supported and has rec-
32 

ommended $5,000,000 above the budget request. The Committee 

believes that some of this additional funding should be applied to 

climate change research to be conducted in concert with the Coastal Data Information Program. The Committee has also recommended $1,000,000 to continue submerged aquatic vegetation 

research in the Chesapeake Bay and $2,500,000 to continue the 

Urban Flood Demonstration Program in cooperation with the 

Desert Research Institute. 

National Shoreline Study.—The Committee recommends an additional $375,000 for the national Planning Center of Expertise for 

Coastal Storm Damage Reduction for continuing to develop a process for managing shore protection projects as part of a systems approach to coastal protection for the purpose of achieving improved 

project performance, increased cost effectiveness, and enhanced 

benefits. 

Water Resources Priorities Study.—No funds are provided for this 

new study start proposed by the administration. 

CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $2,141,677,000 

Budget estimate, 2009 1 ......................................................................... 1,718,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,924,000,000 

1 Excludes emergency appropriations of $4,835,000,000. 

This appropriation includes funds for construction, major rehabilitation and related activities for water resources development 

projects having navigation, flood and storm damage reduction, 

water supply, hydroelectric, environmental restoration, and other 

attendant benefits to the Nation. The construction and major rehabilitation for designated projects for inland and costal waterways 

will derive one-half of the funding from the Inland Waterway Trust 

Fund. Funds to be derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust 

Fund will be applied to cover the Federal share of the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities Program. 

The Administration’s budget request proposes funding for most of 

the construction items in the CG account. However, there were a 

few oversights that the Committee found within the O&M account 

and have chosen to fund those items under CG. The budget request 

for these items is displayed in the O&M account as requested by 

the Administration. These items are listed below. 

When accounting for these items in the traditional accounts, the President’s CG budget request is actually $1,765,067,000 rather 

than $1,718,000,000 as shown above. The projects moved from the 

O&M request include: 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project Name Amount 

Assategue, MD ................................................................................................................................................. 1,000 

Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, NJ ............................................................................................. 400 

Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ ............................................................................................................ 200 

Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes Beach, DE ........................................................................ 350 

Section 111 Program ....................................................................................................................................... 9,043 

Poplar Island, MD ............................................................................................................................................ 8,200 

Dredged Material Disposal Facilities ............................................................................................................... 5,199 

Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), IN .............................................................................................. 13,500 

Section 204/145 ............................................................................................................................................... 9,175 
33 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project Name Amount 

TOTAL, Projects Migrating from Construction to O&M ....................................................................... 47,067

The projects that are included in the line item above for the 

Dredged Material Disposal Facilities are listed in the CG table. 

Due to constrained funding, the Committee reduced the requested amounts for some administration projects. This should not 

be perceived as a lack of support for any of these projects, rather 

it is an attempt by the Committee to balance out the program 

across the Nation and fund most of the projects or studies that 

were funded in fiscal year 2009 but were not addressed by the administration proposal. 

Even with a $280,000,000 increase to the Corps’ accounts, the 

Committee is unable to address all of the needs. The CG account 

is down by $80,500,000 from the fiscal year 2009 Senate proposal. 

By the Committee’s estimate, less than 60 percent of the needed 

funding is available for this account. Construction schedules will 

slip due to this constrained funding. This will result in deferred 

benefits to the national economy. The Committee does not believe 

that there is any way to prioritize the projects to alleviate this 

problem without serious unintended consequences. Adequate resources have been denied for too long. Only providing adequate resources for these national investments will resolve this situation. 

The Committee deleted the new construction starts requested by 

the Administration as sufficient funding does not exist in the current budget nor is there reasonable assurance that sufficient funds 

will be available in the future to accommodate these new items as 

well as ongoing work. 

The appropriation provides funds for the Continuing Authorities 

Program (projects which do not require specific authorizing legislation), which includes projects for flood control (section 205), emergency streambank and shoreline protection (section 14), beach erosion control (section 103), mitigation of shore damages (section 

111), navigation projects (section 107), snagging and clearing (section 208), aquatic ecosystem restoration (section 206), beneficial 

uses of dredged material (section 204), and project modifications for 

improvement of the environment (section 1135). 

The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 

shown on the following table: 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee 

recommendation 

ALABAMA 

TUSCALOOSA, AL ................................................................................................................. .......................... 10,000 

ALASKA 

ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK ........................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

ST. PAUL HARBOR, AK ........................................................................................................ 3,000 3,000 

UNALASKA, AK ..................................................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 
34 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

ARKANSAS 

RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LA, AR & TX ................................................................ .......................... 2,000 

RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, AR & TX ...................................................... .......................... 2,000 

CALIFORNIA 

AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES), CA ................................................. 6,700 6,700 

AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS), C .................................... 66,700 66,700 

AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM RAISE), CA ................................................. 600 600 

CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA ............................................................................ .......................... 5,000 

CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA ................................................................................................ .......................... 500 

FARMINGTON RECHARGE, CA .............................................................................................. .......................... 1,000 

GUADALUPE RIVER, CA ....................................................................................................... .......................... 304 

HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA ............................................................ 14,250 14,250 

KAWEAH RIVER, CA ............................................................................................................. 640 640 

LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, CA ................................................... 885 885 

MID VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA ............................................................... .......................... 2,000 

MURRIETA CREEK, CA ......................................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

NAPA RIVER, CA .................................................................................................................. 5,000 1,000 

NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA ..................................................................... 6,750 ..........................

OAKLAND HARBOR (50-FOOT PROJECT), CA ....................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

PLACER COUNTY, CA ........................................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA .................................................................. 10,000 10,000 

SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA ...................................................... 15,000 15,000 

SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA ...................................... .......................... 500 

SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA .................................................................................................... .......................... 2,500 

SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA ...................................................................................... 52,193 52,193

SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA ..................................................................... 2,500 2,500 

SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (DAM SAFETY), CA ................................................................. 10,000 10,000 

TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA ......................................................................................... .......................... 3,000 

UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA ........................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

WEST SACRAMENTO, CA ...................................................................................................... 2,955 ..........................

YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA ....................................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

DELAWARE 

DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TO LEWES BEACH .................................... .......................... 350 

DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE ................................................................................... .......................... 390 

DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HELOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, BE .................................. .......................... 1,750 

DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, R .................................. .......................... 2,000 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

WASHINGTON, DC & VICINITY ............................................................................................. 6,790 ..........................

FLORIDA 

BREVARD COUNTY, FL (MID AND SOUTH REACHES) .......................................................... .......................... 500 

CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL ................................................................................ 5,565 5,565 

HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE CONTROL) ............................................................. 130,000 130,000 

JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL ................................................................................................. .......................... 950 

LEE COUNTY, FL .................................................................................................................. .......................... 1,400 

MARTIN COUNTY, FL ............................................................................................................ 350 350 

PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL ................................................................................................ .......................... 500 

PINELLAS COUNTY, FL ......................................................................................................... 6,000 6,000 

SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL ........................................... 214,357 163,402 

CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL ..................................................................... (163,771 ) (117,004 ) 

EVERGLADES AND S. FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, ...................................... (1,725 ) (1,725 ) 

KISSIMMEE RIVER, FL ................................................................................................ (44,673 ) (44,673 ) 

MODIFIED WATER DELIVERIES, FL .............................................................................. (4,188 ) ..........................

TAMPA HARBOR, FL ............................................................................................................. .......................... 500 

GEORGIA 

ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, GA .............................................................. .......................... 1,000 

RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC ............................................................... 1,615 1,615 
35 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee 

recommendation 

SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA ...................................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

HAWAII 

IAO STREAMS, HI ................................................................................................................. .......................... 250 

HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI ....................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

KAHUKU, HI .......................................................................................................................... .......................... 4,360 

IDAHO 

RURAL IDAHO ...................................................................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

ILLINOIS 

ALTON TO GALE LEVEE DISTRICT, IL & MO (DEF CORR) .................................................... 300 300 

CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL (DEF CORR) ........................................... 6,500 6,500 

CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL ........................................ 5,000 5,000 

CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL ..................................................................................................... .......................... 3,500 

DES PLAINES RIVER, IL ....................................................................................................... 3,300 6,800 

EAST ST LOUIS, IL ............................................................................................................... 2,000 2,000 

EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL ....................................................................................... .......................... 540 

MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL ......................................................................... 25,000 25,000 

NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL .................................................................. .......................... 300 

OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL & KY ............................................................. 109,790 105,000 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & ............................................. 20,000 18,000 

WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL ....................................................................................................... 1,170 1,170 

INDIANA 

INDIANA HARBOR CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY, IN 1 ....................................................... .......................... 13,500 

LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN ................................................................................................. 20,000 20,000 

MT. ZION MILL POND DAM, FULTON COUNTY, IN ............................................................... .......................... 575 

IOWA 

DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA ............................................................................ .......................... 2,700 

DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA .................................................. .......................... 4,300 

MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE .................................................... 70,000 60,000 

KANSAS 

TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO ........................................................................................ 2,500 3,500 

KENTUCKY 

KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE RIVER, KY ........................................................... 1,000 1,000 

MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY, IL (MAJOR REHAB) 1 ...................................................... 1,000 1,000 

WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL) .................................... 123,000 123,000 

LOUISIANA 

ASCENSION PARISH, LA [EI] ................................................................................................ .......................... 1,000 

COMITE RIVER, LA ............................................................................................................... .......................... 8,000 

EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [FC] ................................................................................ .......................... 3,000 

EAST BATON ROUGE, LA [EI] .............................................................................................. .......................... 500 

J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA ............................................................................... 7,000 7,000 

LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA [CG] .............................................................................. 1,200 5,800 

LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [EI] ............................................................................................... .......................... 500 

MARYLAND 

ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD ................................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD .................................................................................. .......................... 4,500 

CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION ............................... .......................... 1,000 

CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & VA .............................................................. .......................... 2,000 

POPLAR ISLAND, MD ............................................................................................................ .......................... 8,550 

MASSACHUSETTS 

MUDDY RIVER, MA .............................................................................................................. 4,000 5,000 
36 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

MICHIGAN 

GENESEE COUNTY, MI ......................................................................................................... .......................... 600 

GEORGE W. KUHN DRAIN PROJECT, MI ............................................................................... .......................... 300 

GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MI .............................................. .......................... 2,000 

NEGAUNEE, MI ..................................................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

SAULT STE MARIE REPLACEMENT LOCK, MI ....................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

MINNESOTA 

BRECKENRIDGE, MN ............................................................................................................ .......................... 5,000 

ROSEAU, MN ........................................................................................................................ .......................... 2,500 

MISSISSIPPI 

DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM, MS .................................................... .......................... 8,000

MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MS ........................................................ .......................... 10,000 

MISSOURI 

BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO ............................................................................... .......................... 750 

BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO .......................................................................... 5,600 5,600 

CHESTERFIELD, MO ............................................................................................................. 3,331 3,331 

CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL) .................................................................... 40,000 40,000 

KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS .................................................................................................... 700 ..........................

MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY CITY LEVEE, MO ............................................................. .......................... 1,525 

MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO .................................... 580 580 

MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT, MO ....................................... .......................... 1,000 

MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L–385), MO, IA, NE, KS ................................................ .......................... 2,500 

ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO .................................................................................... 566 566 

SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO ........................................................... .......................... 4,000 

MONTANA 

FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT ................................................................................. .......................... 1,869 

RURAL MONTANA, MT .......................................................................................................... .......................... 5,000 

NEBRASKA 

ANTELOPE CREEK, NE ......................................................................................................... 5,697 5,697 

NEVADA 

RURAL NEVADA [EI], NV ...................................................................................................... .......................... 15,000 

NEW JERSEY 

BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR INLET, NJ ......................................................... .......................... 5,000 

BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET (ABSECON IS ...................................... .......................... 2,000 

BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, BRIGANTINE ....................................... .......................... 80 

CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ ....................................................................... .......................... 200 

DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, NJ, PA, DE ............................................... .......................... 10,000 

GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ ................................................................. 6,500 6,500 

GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NJ ................................................................ .......................... 3,500 

HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ ....................................................................................... .......................... 500 

JOSEPH G. MINISH WATERFRONT, NJ .................................................................................. .......................... 3,000 

LOWER CAP MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NJ ............................................................ .......................... 400 

PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MGMT, NJ ............................................................................ .......................... 1,000 

RAMAPO RIVER AT MAHWAH AND SUFFERN, NJ ................................................................. .......................... 200 

RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ ........................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT MONMOUTH, NJ ............................................ .......................... 2,000 

RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ ...................................................... 7,000 7,000 

SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ ............................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ ...................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

NEW MEXICO 

ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM ................................................................................... .......................... 500 

ALAMOGORDO, NM .............................................................................................................. .......................... 4,200 

MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELE ..................................... .......................... 800 
37 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE, ..................................... 800 800 

SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM ........................................................................... .......................... 4,000 

NEW YORK 

ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT, ...................................... 3,000 3,000 

FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY ...................................................................... 5,800 5,800 

LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY .................................................................................................... 700 700 

NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ ............................................................... 64,716 60,000 

NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY ....................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

NEW YORK STATE CANAL, NY ............................................................................................. .......................... 1,000 

ONONDAGA LAKE, NY .......................................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NY ............................................................................................ .......................... 1,000 

NORTH CAROLINA 

BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC ................................................................................... .......................... 900 

CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, NC .................................................................................. 1,500 1,500 

WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET, NC ............................................................ 400 400 

WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC .................................................................................................. 1,800 1,800 

NORTH DAKOTA 

GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND (REPLACEMENT) ................................................. 8,620 8,620 

GRAND FORKS, ND—EAST GRAND FORKS, MN .................................................................. .......................... 2,617 

MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND ................................................................................... .......................... 300 

NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ND ................................................... .......................... 15,000 

OHIO 

DOVER DAM, MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE) .................................... 18,500 18,500 

HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OHIO .......................................................................... .......................... 1,656 

OHIO EI, OH ......................................................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

OKLAHOMA 

CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY) ....................................................................................... 24,250 24,250 

OREGON 

COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA ............................................ 500 500 

ELK CREEK LAKE, OR .......................................................................................................... 500 500 

WILLAMETTE TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR ......................................................................... 11,000 11,000 

PENNSYLVANIA 

EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRE ........................................ 25,000 25,000 

LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA ................................................ 6,210 6,210 

PRESQUE ISLE, PA ............................................................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA ............................................................................. .......................... 1,200 

PUERTO RICO 

PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR ............................................................................... 45,000 42,000 

RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR ..................................................................................................... 5,000 5,000 

SOUTH DAKOTA 

BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD ................................................................................... .......................... 4,000 

TENNESSEE 

CENTER HILL DAM (SEEPAGE CONTROL), TN ...................................................................... 56,000 56,000 

CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN ..................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

TEXAS 

BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX ............................................................................................. 7,300 5,300 

CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER TRINITY RIVER, TX .................................................. .......................... 500 

CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX .................................................................................. .......................... 2,000 

DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER, TX ........................................................... .......................... 22,000 

JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ARLINGTON, TX ................................................. .......................... 1,500 
38 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK .............................................................. .......................... 1,000 

SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX ....................................................................... .......................... 5,000 

SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX ................................................................................................ 25,700 18,000 

TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX ................................................................................................... 8,000 6,000 

UTAH 

RURAL UTAH, UT [EI] .......................................................................................................... .......................... 20,000 

VERMONT 

BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT ................................................................................................... .......................... 500 

LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT ....................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

VIRGINIA 

AIWW, BRIDGES AT DEEP CREEK, VA ................................................................................. 1,500 ..........................

JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, VA ................................................................. .......................... 2,234 

JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (REPLACEMENT) ....................................... 16,915 16,915 

NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA ............................................................................ 28,500 ..........................

NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA ........................................................ .......................... 1,000 

RICHMOND CSO, VA ............................................................................................................ .......................... 150 

ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS AREA, VA ................................................... 1,075 1,075 

WASHINGTON 

CHIEF JOSEPH GAS ABATEMENT, WA .................................................................................. 1,000 1,000 

COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR & WA ................................................................... 95,800 85,000 

DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA ......................................................................... 2,600 2,600 

HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA ................................................................................................ 13,000 13,000 

LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA, OR .......................................... 1,650 1,650 

LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMP, WA, OR, ID ........................................... 1,500 1,500 

MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA ......................................................................... 1,500 1,500 

MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA ................................................................................................... 400 400 

PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WA ............................................... .......................... 200 

SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA ..................................................................................... .......................... 5,000 

WEST VIRGINIA 

BLUESTONE LAKE, WV ......................................................................................................... 86,700 86,700 

GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV .......................................................................................... .......................... 1,500 

ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND LOGAN, WV, VA .................................................... .......................... 21,750 

LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, V ................................... .......................... 6,750 

VIRGINIA .............................................................................................................................. .......................... (4,000 ) 

WEST VIRGINIA .................................................................................................................... .......................... (2,750 ) 

LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV ........................................................................................ .......................... 1,955 

SUBTOTAL, FOR PROJECTS .................................................................................... 1,610,020 1,815,414 

NATIONAL PROGRAMS: 

AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL ................................................................................................... 4,000 5,000 

GUNTERSVILLE LAKE HYDRILLA/MILFOIL ............................................................................. .......................... (150 ) 

FIFE LAKE AQUATIC WEED CONTROL, MI ................................................................... .......................... (145 ) 

BLACK LAKE, OGDENSBURG, NY ................................................................................ .......................... (100 ) 

SODUS BAY, NY .......................................................................................................... .......................... (100 ) 

LAKE CHAUTAUQUA, JAMESTOWN, NY ........................................................................ .......................... (50 ) 

LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT ................................................................................................. .......................... (500 ) 

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM 

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206) .......................................................... 6,967 25,000 

UPPER YORK CREEK DAM REMOVAL, CA ................................................................... .......................... ..........................

GOOSE CREEK, CO ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

TAMARISK ERADICATION ALONG THE COLORADO RIVER, .......................................... .......................... ..........................

MILL RIVER RESTORATION, STAMFORD, CT ............................................................... .......................... ..........................

CHATTAHOOCHEE FALL-LINE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION ........................................... .......................... ..........................

JACKSON CREEK, GWINNETT CO, GA .......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LITTLE RIVER WATERSHED, HALL COUNTY, GA .......................................................... .......................... ..........................
39 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

PARADISE CREEK, ID .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

CHARITON RIVER AND RATHBUN LAKE WATERSHED, IA ............................................ .......................... ..........................

EMIQUON PRESERVE, IL ............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

ORLAND PARK, IL ....................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CHARITON RIVER/RATHBUN LAKE, IA ......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CLEAR CREEK AND IOWA RIVER, JOHNSON COUNTY, IA ........................................... .......................... ..........................

DUCK CREEK, DAVENPORT, IA ................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

STORM LAKE, IA ......................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

VENTURA MARSH, IA .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

WHITEBREAST CREEK WATERSHED, IA ....................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BURAS MARINA, LA .................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

FALSE RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, POINT COUPE ........................................... .......................... ..........................

LAKE KILLARNEY, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, .................................................. .......................... ..........................

ZEMURRAY PARK LAKE RESTORATION, TANGIPAHOA PAR ......................................... .......................... ..........................

MALDEN RIVER ECOSYSTEM, MA ............................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MILFORD POND RESTORATION, MILFORD, MA ............................................................ .......................... ..........................

DEEP RUN/TIBER HUDSON, HOWARD COUNTY, MD ................................................... .......................... ..........................

DOG ISLAND SHOALS, MD .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

GREENBURY POINT, MD ............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

NORTH BEACH, MD .................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

NORTHWEST BRANCH, ANACOSTIA RIVER, MD .......................................................... .......................... ..........................

PAINT BRANCH FISH PASSAGE, MD ........................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PAINTER CREEK, MN .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

MUSCONETCONG RIVER DAM REMOVALS, NJ ............................................................ .......................... ..........................

BLUE HOLE LAKE STATE PARK, NM ........................................................................... .......................... ..........................

JANES-WALLACE MEMORIAL DAM, SANTA ROSA, NM ................................................. .......................... ..........................

KINGS PARK, NY ......................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MUD CREEK, GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY ........................................................................ .......................... ..........................

SOUNDVIEW PARK, BRONX, NY .................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

SPRING CREEK, NY .................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CONCORD STREAMS RESTORATION, NC ..................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WESTERN CARY STREAM RESTORATION, CARY, NC .................................................. .......................... ..........................

WILSON BAY RESTORATION, JACKSONVILLE, NC ........................................................ .......................... ..........................

DRAYTON DAM, ND ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CAMP CREEK, ZUMWALT PRAIRIE PRESERVE, OR ..................................................... .......................... ..........................

EUGENE DELTA PONDS, OR ........................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

KELLOGG CREEK, OR .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

OAKS BOTTOM, OR ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SPRINGFIELD MILLRACE, OR ...................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CODORUS CREEK WATERSHED RESTORATION, PA ..................................................... .......................... ..........................

NARROW RIVER, RI .................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WINNEAPAUG POND RESTORATION, RI ....................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MOSES LAKE, TX ........................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

RIO GRANDE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LAREDO, TX .............................................. .......................... ..........................

SPRING LAKE, SAN MARCOS, TX ................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

STEPHENVILLE WWTP, TX ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CARPENTER CREEK, WA ............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204, 206, 933 ................................ .......................... 10,000 

BLACKHAWK BOTTOMS, IA .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, SHELL ISLAND PASS, ST. MAR ................................................ .......................... ..........................

CALC RV, MI 5—14 KS, LA ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL BARRIER ISLAND RESTORAT ......................................... .......................... ..........................

CAPE COD CANAL, SANDWICH, MA ............................................................................ .......................... ..........................

NEWBURY HARBOR, MA ............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

NJIWW BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGE, NJ ................................................................... .......................... ..........................

NJIWW, DREDGED HOLE 35, NJ .................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BUFFALO RIVER, NY ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MANTEO OLD HOUSE, NC ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MAUMEE BAY REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, OH ............................................ .......................... ..........................

WYNN ROAD REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, OH .............................................. .......................... ..........................

SOUTH PADRE ISLAND, TX ......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................
40 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION ................................. 1,477 7,000 

FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205) ....................................................................... 12,049 38,000 

INDIAN BAYOU, AR ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WYNNE, AR ................................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

COSGROVE CREEK, CALAVERAS COUNTY, CA ............................................................ .......................... ..........................

LAS GALLINAS CREEK/SANTA VENETIA LEVEE, CA ..................................................... .......................... ..........................

PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT, DE .............................................................. .......................... ..........................

INDIAN/DRY CREEK CEDAR RAPIDS, IA ...................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MAD CREEK, MUSCATINE, IA ...................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WINNEBAGO RIVER, MASON CITY, IA ......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CONCORDIA, KS .......................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

EUREKA CREEK, MANHATTAN, KS .............................................................................. .......................... ..........................

NEODESHA, KS ............................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

SEDGWICK, KS ............................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

HOPKINSVILLE DRY-DAM, KY ...................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

NORTH RIVER, PEABODY, MA ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MCKINNEY BAYOU, TUNICA COUNTY, MS ................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BLACKSNAKE CREEK, ST. JOSEPH, MO ...................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION, DUTCHTOWN, MO .............................................................. .......................... ..........................

LIVINGSTON, MT ......................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PLATT RIVER, FREMONT, NE ...................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PLATT RIVER, SCHUYLER, NE ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

HATCH, NM ................................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

ASSUNPINK CREEK, HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, MERCER CO ........................................... .......................... ..........................

JACKSON BROOK, NJ .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

PENNSVILLE, NJ .......................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PORT JERVIS, NY ........................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

BLANCHARD RIVER, OTTAWA, OH (OTTAWA, OH) ....................................................... .......................... ..........................

DUCK CREEK, OH ....................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

FINDLAY, OH ............................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PHILADELPHIA SHIPYARD SEA WALL, PHILADELPHIA, ................................................ .......................... ..........................

RIO DESCLABRADO, PR .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

RIO GUAMANI-GUAYA, PR ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

EAST PROVIDENCE, RI ................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

BEAVER CREEK AND TRIBS, BRISTOL, TN ................................................................. .......................... ..........................

WV STATEWIDE FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, WV .......................................................... .......................... ..........................

NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107) ............................................................................... 1,436 7,000 

SAVOONGA HARBOR, AK ............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

OYSTER POINT MARINA/PARK BREAKWATER, CA ....................................................... .......................... ..........................

NAPOLEAN AVENUE CONTAINER TERMINAL ACCESS, NE ........................................... .......................... ..........................

BASS HARBOR, ME ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BUCKS HARBOR, MACHIASPORT, ME ......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

RHODES POINT, SOMERSET CO, MD .......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WOODS HOLE, GREAT HARBOR, WOODS HOLE, MA ................................................... .......................... ..........................

MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR BREAKWATER, MI .......................................................... .......................... ..........................

NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN, TRAVERSE CITY, MI ...................................................... .......................... ..........................

HAMPTON HARBOR, NH .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

DELAWARE RIVER, FAIRLESS TURNING BASIN, PA ..................................................... .......................... ..........................

CHARLESTOWN BREACHWAY AND INLET, RI .............................................................. .......................... ..........................

POINT JUDITH HARBOR, EXPANSION STUDY, RI ......................................................... .......................... ..........................

NORTHWEST TENNESSEE REGIONAL HARBOR, TN ..................................................... .......................... ..........................

TANGIER ISLAND JETTY, VA ........................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION 111) .............................................................. .......................... 9,043 

MOBILE PASS, AL ....................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

EAST PASS CHANNEL, PANAMA CITY, FL ................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BRUN HARBOR/JEKYLL IMPROVEMENTS, GA .............................................................. .......................... ..........................

CAMP ELLIS, SACO, ME .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL, MI ........................................................... .......................... ..........................

MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY ............................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

VERMILLION HARBOR, OH .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................
41 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

WHITCOMB FLATS, WA ................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTI .................................. 5,736 25,000 

LOWER CACHE RESTORATION, AR .............................................................................. .......................... ..........................

MILLWOOD LAKE, GRASSY LAKE, AR .......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LOWER KINGMAN ISLAND, DC .................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BRAIDED REACH, ID ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SHORTY’S ISLAND, ID ................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

RATHBUN LAKE HABITAT RESTORATION, IA ............................................................... .......................... ..........................

GREEN RIVER DAM MOD, KY ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BAYOU DESIARD, MONROE, LA .................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL MILE 12—31.4 RESTORATION ...................................... .......................... ..........................

MORGANZA FORE-BAY RESTORATION, LA .................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BLOOMINGTON STATE PARK, MO ................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

BLUE VALLEY WETLANDS, JACKSON COUNTY, MO ..................................................... .......................... ..........................

DUCK CREEK, STODDARD COUNTY, MO ..................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LINCOLN PARK WEST, ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION STUD ........................................... .......................... ..........................

LAS CRUCES DAM ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DON .......................................... .......................... ..........................

AQUATIC HABITAT RESTORATION at PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA, NM ............................. .......................... ..........................

NORTHPORT HARBOR, NY .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SMOKES CREEK, NY ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PRISON FARM SHORELINE HABITAT, ND .................................................................... .......................... ..........................

TAPPAN LAKE, OH ....................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LOWER COLUMBIA SLOUGH, OR ................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

WALLA WALLA RIVER, OR ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LAKE CHAMPLAIN LAMPREY BARRIERS, VT ............................................................... .......................... ..........................

BENNINGTON LAKE DIVERSION DAM, WA ................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103) ................................................................................... 680 4,230 

BAY FARM ISLAND, CA [BAY FARM DIKE, CA] ........................................................... .......................... ..........................

GOLETA BEACH, CA .................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PISMO BEACH, CA ...................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PROSPECT BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT ......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

COASTAL AREAS, MARSHFIELD, MA ........................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SEASIDE PARK, OCEAN COUNTY, NJ .......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

FORT SAN GERONIMO, PR .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LINCOLN PARK BEACH, WA ........................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION 208) ......................................................................... 200 200 

CAMP BAYOU CANAL, MOREHOUSE PARISH, LA ........................................................ .......................... ..........................

SNAGGING AND CLEARING UPPER BAYOU BOEUF, LA ............................................... .......................... ..........................

AUGLAIZE RIVER, OH .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BLACKWELL LAKE, BLACKWELL, OK ........................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SWCD FLOOD REDUCTION, OR ................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION PROGRAM ........................................ 49,100 49,100 

DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE STUDIES: 

ISABELLA DAM, CA.

MARTIS CREEK DAM, CA & NV .................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

CHERRY CREEK DAM, CO .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

DWORSHAK DAM, ID ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA ........................................................................ .......................... ..........................

SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION STUDIES: 

BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAM, AR .................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

HIDDEN DAM, CA ........................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

SAN ANTONIO DAM, CA .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

TERMINUS DAM, CA ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WHITTIER NARROWS DAM, CA .................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

TRINIDAD DAM, CO ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

HOP BROOK DAM, CT ................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

MANSFIELD HOLLOW DAM, CT .................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

HERBERT HOOVER DIKE (REACH 2&3), FL ................................................................ .......................... ..........................

DWORSHAK DAM, ID ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LA GRANGE L&D, IL ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LAKE SHELBYVILLE DAM, IL ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................
42 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER, LOCK AND DAM 24, IL&MO ........................................................ .......................... ..........................

MISSISSIPPI RIVER, LOCK AND DAM 25, IL&MO ........................................................ .......................... ..........................

THOMAS J. O’BRIEN CONTROLLING WORKS L&D, IL .................................................. .......................... ..........................

BROOKVILLE DAM, IN ................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

J. EDWARD ROUSH DAM, IN ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PATOKA LAKE DAM, IN ............................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SALAMONIE LAKE DAM, IN ......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

HARTFORD LEVEE AT JOHN REDMOND, KS ................................................................ .......................... ..........................

GREEN RIVER LAKE DAM, KY ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY & OH ..................................................................... .......................... ..........................

NOLIN LAKE DAM, KY ................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

ROUGH RIVER LAKE, DAM, KY ................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SALAMONIE LAKE DAM, KY ......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

RUSSELL B. LONG L&D, LA ........................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

WESTVILLE LAKE DAM, MA ......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MISSISSIPPI RIVER LOCK AND DAM 1, MN ................................................................ .......................... ..........................

MISSISSIPPI RIVER LOCK AND DAM 2, MN ................................................................ .......................... ..........................

MISSISSIPPI RIVER LOCK AND DAM 3, MN ................................................................ .......................... ..........................

ORWELL RESERVOIR DAM, MN ................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

ARKABUTLA, MS ......................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CAPE FEAR RIVER LOCK AND DAM 1, NC ................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BEACH CITY DAM, OH ................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

BOLIVAR DAM, OH ...................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

DELAWARE DAM, OH .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

MAGNOLIA LEVEE,(BOLIVAR DAM), OH ....................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MOHAWK DAM, OH ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CUMBERLAND DIKE—TEXOMA, OK ............................................................................ .......................... ..........................

KEYSTONE LAKE DAM, OK .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM, OK ....................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA .................................................................... .......................... ..........................

FOSTER DAM, OR ....................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WILLAMETTE FALLS LOCK, OR .................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CHARLEROIS (MONOR), PA ......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CURWENSVILLE DAM, PA ............................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

EAST BRANCH DAM, CLARION RIVER, PA .................................................................. .......................... ..........................

HAMMOND DAM, PA ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MONTGOMERY LOCKS AND DAM, PA .......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

J. PERCY PRIEST, TN .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

ADDICKS DAM, BUFFALO BAYOU, TX .......................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BARKER DAM (BUFFALO BAYOU,), TX ........................................................................ .......................... ..........................

LEWISVILLE DAM, TX .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

PROCTOR DAM, TX ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

STILLHOUSE-HOLLOW DAM, TX ................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

TOWN BLUFF DAM, TX ................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

WHITNEY LEVEE, TX ................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BALL MOUNTAIN DAM, VT .......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MILL CREEK AND MILL CREEK DIVERSION DAM, WA ................................................. .......................... ..........................

NEW CUMBERLAND L&D, WV ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

CEDARS LOCK AND DAM, WI ...................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

DEPERE GEN LAWS, WI .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

LITTLE CHUTE, WI ....................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

RAPIDE CROCHE LOCK AND DAM, WI ........................................................................ .......................... ..........................

DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROGRAM [DMDF] ........................................... .......................... 5,199 

JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL 1 .................................................................................... .......................... (1,000 ) 

SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA 1 ......................................................................................... .......................... (900 ) 

CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN 1 ................................................................. .......................... (1,501 ) 

CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 1 ..................................................................................... .......................... (1,798 ) 

EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND ..................................................................................... 21,000 21,000 

ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106–457) .............................................. 5,000 1,000 

INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD EXPENSES) .................................................... 60 60 
43 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee 

recommendation 

INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE EXP) ................................................................... 275 275 

SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION .............................. .......................... 1,000 

SUBTOTAL, FOR PROJECTS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES ....................................... 107,980 208,107 

SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE ...................................................................................................... .......................... ¥100,426 

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL .......................................................................... 1,718,000 1,924,000 

Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa [ACT], Apalachicola-ChattahoocheeFlint [ACF] Rivers, Alabama, Florida, and Georgia.—The Secretary 

of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is directed to 

provide an updated calculation of the critical yield of all Federal 

projects in the ACF river basin and an updated calculation of the 

critical yield of all Federal projects in the ACT river basin within 

120 days of enactment of this Act. 

Tuscaloosa, Alabama.—The Committee recommends $10,000,000 

for the relocation project at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 

Unalaska, Alaska.—The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for 

continuation of this navigation project. 

Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Arkansas.—The Committee has included no 

funding to complete the continuing contract for this project that 

was not funded in the budget request. It is the Committee’s understanding that the administration has committed to fund this 

project through surplus ARRA funds. 

Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma 

and Texas.—The Committee recommends $2,000,000 to continue 

levee rehabilitation work in Arkansas and Louisiana to protect the 

1.7 million-acre flood plain from crop damage; loss of livestock; 

damage to levees, railroads, highways, industries, and other river 

and urban developments. 

Red River Emergency Bank Protection, Arkansas and Louisiana.—The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for protection of 

critical infrastructure and land along the Red River below Index, 

Arkansas. The project plan provides for revetment, dikes, or cutoffs 

that can be accomplished in advance of developing the design for 

the entire project. 

Mid Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, California.—The Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 reconstruction of this 

flood control project. The project includes levee reconstruction 

through installing landside berms with toe drains, ditch relocation, 

embankment modification, slurry cut-off walls, and developing land 

for fish and wildlife mitigation. 

Napa River, California.—The Committee recommendation includes $1,000,000 rather than the $5,000,000 proposed in the budget. This amount was reduced in recognition of the nearly 

$100,000,000 this project received in the ARRA not due to any diminution of support for the project by the Committee. 

Napa River Salt Marsh, California.—The Committee has not recommended any funding for this new construction start proposed by 

the administration. 
44 

Santa Ana River, California.—The Committee recommends 

$52,193,000 to continue construction of this flood control project. 

West Sacramento, California.—The Committee recommendation 

included funding for the General Reevaluation Report in the General Investigations Table. 

Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes Beach, Delaware.—The Committee has funded this item in this table. The 

budget request is shown in the O&M table as proposed by the administration. 

Delaware Coast Protection, Delaware.—The Committee recommendation includes $390,000 to reimburse the State for the Federal share of the annual operation and maintenance of the sand bypass facilities. 

Washington, DC and Vicinity, District of Columbia.—The Committee recommendation has provided no funding for this new construction start proposed by the administration. 

Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration, Florida.— 

The Committee has chosen to display the various, separately authorized components of the project in the table in addition to a single line item as was proposed in the budget. The Committee believes that it is prudent to maintain visibility of the various project 

elements in the budget process. The Committee has deleted the two 

new start requests proposed by the administration for the Everglades these are Site one and Indian River Lagoon-South. The total 

for these new construction starts is $46,767,000 and the Central 

and Southern Florida line item has been reduced by this amount. 

This should not be interpreted as a reduction of support by this 

Committee for this project. Even without the new starts, the funding level for fiscal year 2010 is nearly $40,000,000 more than what 

was provided in fiscal year 2009. Since fiscal year 2000 this Committee has provided more than $1,300,000,000 in funding for Everglades restoration projects which is nearly twice the level of resources received by any other construction project in the same period. 

The Committee has provided no funding for the Modified Waters 

Delivery Plan ($4,188,000) as proposed in the budget. The Committee directed in the fiscal year 2009 Omnibus that this project 

should be funded through the Interior appropriations budget in future years. The Committee again directs the administration to include the Modified Waters Delivery Plan funding in the Interior 

budget in future budget submissions. 

Central and South Florida, Florida.—Within the funds recommended, the Corps shall continue work on the Upper St. Johns 

River project. 

Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.—The Committee has recommended 

$950,000 to continue work on the general reevaluation report concerning further channel deepening. 

Tampa Harbor, Florida.—$500,000 is provided to complete the 

preconstruction engineering and design of navigation improvements and channel deepening. 

Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Illinois.—The Committee has 

recommended $5,000,000 for construction on aquatic nuisance species Barriers I and II. 
45 

Olmsted Locks and Dam, Ohio River, Illinois and Kentucky.—The 

Committee recommends $105,000,000 to continue construction of 

this project. None of the funds provided for the Olmsted Locks and 

Dam Project or any other construction funds are to be used to reimburse the Claims and Judgment Fund. 

Upper Mississippi River Restoration, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, 

Missouri and Wisconsin.—The Corps is directed to complete a plan 

to transition this project to the Navigation and Ecosystem Sustainability Program [NESP] for the Upper Mississippi River System 

[UMRS]. Funding for NESP is dependent on a solution to shortfalls 

in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund, therefore a transition to 

NESP is not anticipated in the immediate future. However, in 

order to facilitate the eventual transition, while maintaining the 

Corps ecosystem restoration capacity on the UMRS, the Corps is 

directed to limit planning or construction under this authority to 

projects that can be completed or readily transferred to NESP within 2 years of NESP receiving sufficient construction funding to support program transition. 

Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), Indiana.—The 

Committee has recommended funding for this project in the CG account rather than in the O&M account as proposed by the administration. 

Missouri Fish and Wildlife Recovery, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, 

Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.—The Committee recommends $60,000,000 for this project. Within the recommended funds, $18,000,000 is to be used for modifications to the 

Intake Dam to provide additional habitat for the pallid sturgeon. 

Turkey Creek, Kansas and Missouri.—The Committee recommendation includes $3,500,000 to continue construction of this 

project. 

Kentucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, Kentucky.—The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for continuation of the project. 

Funding deficits in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund prohibit the 

Committee from providing additional funds for the upstream lock 

excavation contract. The Committee recognizes that this is a critical path contract for the overall schedule. However, until the revenue stream for the Inland Waterway Trust Fund is enhanced, the 

Committee actions will be limited by available Trust Fund revenues. 

Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.—The Committee has recommended $5,800,000 to continue efforts to provide 100-year flood 

protection for this project. Surveys show the levee grade is deficient 

by 12–18 inches. 

Assateague Island Restoration, Maryland.—The Committee has 

recommended funding for this project in the CG table as has been 

the Committee tradition. The budget request is shown in O&M as 

proposed by the administration. 

Chesapeake Bay Environmental Program, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.—The Committee has recommended $1,000,000 

for continuation of this project that is integral to the clean-up of 

the Chesapeake Bay. 

Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, Maryland and Virginia.—The 

Committee recommends $2,000,000 to continue oyster recovery efforts. 
46 

Poplar Island, Maryland.—The Committee has recommended 

funding for this project in the CG table as has been the Committee 

tradition. The budget request is shown in O&M as proposed by the 

administration. 

Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas.—The Committee has not 

recommended any funding for this new construction start proposed 

by the administration. 

Meramec River Basin, Valley City, Missouri.—The Committee 

recommendation includes $1,525,000 for additional flood risk management features to address problems that became apparent during the 2008 flood. 

Fort Peck Dam and Lake, Montana.—The Committee recommendation includes $1,869,000 for continuation of the disposition of Fort Peck cabins. 

Rural Nevada, Nevada.—The Committee recommendation pro- vides $15,000,000 for this project. Within the funds provided the 

Corps should give consideration to projects at North Lemmon Valley; Spanish Springs Phased Sewering Project; Indian Springs 

Wastewater Collection and Treatment System Project; the 

MoapaValley Wastewater Collection System Project; the Searchlight Water System Improvements Project; Huffaker Hills Water 

Conservation; Lawton-Verdi; Boulder City; Lyon County; Gerlach; 

Incline Village; Esmeralda County; Cold Springs; Fallon; Goldfield; 

Churchill County; West Wendover; Yearington; Virgin Valley 

Water District; Lovelock; Truckee Meadows Water Authority; 

McGill-Ruth Consolidated Sewer and Water District; Carlin; Eldorado Valley; Ely and Carson City. Other communities that meet 

the program criteria should be considered as funding allows. 

Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, New Jersey.—The Committee 

has recommended funding for this project in the CG table as has 

been the Committee tradition. The budget request is shown in 

O&M as proposed by the administration. 

Lower Cape May Meadows—Cape May Point, New Jersey.—The 

Committee has recommended funding for this project in the CG 

table as has been the Committee tradition. The budget request is 

shown in O&M as proposed by the administration. 

Acequias Irrigation System, New Mexico.—The Committee recommends $500,000 to continue restoration of these historic irrigation distribution systems. 

Middle Rio Grande Restoration, New Mexico.—The Committee 

recommendation includes $24,016,000 to continue environmental 

restoration efforts along the Rio Grande River within Bernalillo 

County. 

North Dakota [EI], North Dakota.—The Committee has recommended $15,000,000 for this program. $7,900,000 is for the 

Traill Rural Water District; $3,000,000 is for the North Central 

Rural Water District; $950,000 is for the Barnes Rural Water District; $750,000 for the Williams Rural Water District; $600,000 for 

the Langdon Rural Water District; $425,000 for the North Prairie 

Rural Water District; and $375,000 for the Greater Ramsey Water 

District. 

New York and New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey.— 

The Committee recommends $60,000 for continued construction of 

this harbor project. The reduction made under this heading should 
47 

not be viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather 

an attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the Corps. 

Ohio [EI], Ohio.—The Committee recommendation includes 

$1,000,000. These funds should be used for the Marietta WWTP 

and the Coalton Waterline. 

Presque Isle, Pennsylvania.—The Committee recommends 

$1,000,000 to continue this project. 

Big Sioux River, South Dakota.—The Committee recommends 

$4,000,000 to continue construction of this project. The Committee 

recognizes that, rightly or wrongly, there was an expectation by the 

project sponsors that this project was to be funded under the 

ARRA. When the project list was released, this project was not on 

the list due to the incredibly tortured criteria the administration 

utilized to decide which projects were funded. The Committee encourages the Corps to give consideration to funding this project if 

surplus ARRA funds become available. 

Central City, Fort Worth, Upper Trinity River Basin, Texas.—The 

Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for the Central City, 

Fort Worth, Texas, project. 

Red River Basin Chloride Control, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas 

and Louisiana.—The Committee recommends $1,000,000 to continue construction of the project. 

Sims Bayou, Houston, Texas.—The Committee recommendation 

includes $20,000,000 for this project. The reduction made to this 

project should not be viewed as any diminution of support for this 

project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers 

nationwide program among the various missions of the Corps. 

Rural Utah, [EI], Utah.—The Committee recommendation includes $20,000,000 to continue construction of eligible projects. 

Burlington Harbor, Vermont.—The Committee recommends 

$500,000 to continue work on removal of oil bollards in the harbor. 

Lake Champlain Watershed Initiative, Vermont.—The Committee 

recommendation includes $1,000,000 for continuation of this 

project. 

AIWW, Bridges at Deep Creek, Virginia.—The Committee has not 

recommended any funding for this new construction start proposed 

by the administration. 

Norfolk Harbor, Craney Island, Virginia.—The Committee has 

not recommended any funding for this new construction start proposed by the administration. 

Columbia River Fish Mitigation, Washington, Oregon, and 

Idaho.—The Committee recommendation includes $85,000,000 for 

this project. The reduction made to this project should not be 

viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program 

among the various missions of the Corps. 

Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland 

River, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Virginia.—The Committee recommends $6,750,000 for the continuation of the project. Within the 

funds recommended, the Committee includes $4,000,000 for the 

Buchanan County, Dickenson County, and Grundy, Virginia elements. Further, the recommendation includes $2,750,000 for 
48 

Kermit, Lower Mingo County, McDowell County, Upper Mingo, and 

Wayne County, West Virginia. 

Aquatic Plant Control Program.—The Committee recommendation includes $5,000,000 for this program. Funds above the budget 

request are included for cost-shared programs for Guntersville 

Lake, Alabama; Fife Lake, Michigan; Black Rock Lake, Odensburg, 

New York; Sodus Bay, New York; Lake Champlain, Vermont; and 

Lake Chautauqua, Jamestown, New York. 

Section 204 and Section 111 of the Continuing Authorities Program.—The Committee has recommended funding for these programs in the CG table as has been the Committee tradition. The 

budget request is shown in O&M as proposed by the administration. 

Dredged Material Disposal Facilities Program.—The Committee 

has recommended funding for this project in the CG table as has 

been the Committee tradition. The budget request is shown in 

O&M as proposed by the administration. 

Estuary Restoration Program.—The Committee has included 

$1,000,000 for this program. Within this amount, consideration 

should be given to the Colorado Lagoon, California, Restoration 

project. 

Shore Line Erosion Control Development and Demonstration Program.—The Committee has recommended $1,000,000 to continue 

monitoring programs and other appropriate activities under this 

authority. 

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM

When Congress authorized the initial Continuing Authorities in 

the 1940s and 1950s, they were envisioned to provide a small pool 

of money available to the Corps of Engineers to solve very small 

localized problems without being encumbered by the longer study 

and project authorization process. As more programs were added to 

the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP] they became increasingly popular with congressional Members and the public. More 

and more congressionally directed projects began to appear in the 

annual appropriations bills. At first these congressionally directed 

projects were added to the base program. As more and more of 

these congressionally directed projects came into the program it became difficult for these congressionally directed projects to be 

added to the base, and as such, the base program began to shrink. 

Congressionally directed projects now dominate all sections of the 

CAP Program. Congressionally directed projects have proliferated 

to such an extent that several of the sections are over-subscribed. 

The budget justifications for the CAP program do not provide 

much useful information as to how the administration developed its 

program for fiscal year 2010. There is a dollar value associated 

with each section and a listing of projects in priority order that corresponds to the amount. However, the Committee has no way of 

knowing whether the amount shown is adequate. The Corps is directed to provide more information to justify the amount shown on 

the justification sheets for fiscal year 2011. 

Starting in fiscal year 2008 the Committee no longer provided 

any congressional earmarks for the section 14, Emergency Bank 

Stabilization authority. Again this year, the Committee has not 
49 

provided either the administration’s earmark requests for this section or requests by Members for fiscal year 2010. By definition 

these are projects that are estimated to fail within 9–12 months. 

As an emergency situation the Chief of Engineers should have the 

responsibility for determining how these funds are expended in the 

most efficient and effective manner. Budget justifications for this 

section should display the anticipated projects and associated costs 

to be undertaken in the budget year as well as the anticipated resources necessary to address emergencies that arise in the budget 

year. 

Starting in fiscal year 2011, the Committee will no longer list individual projects in the CAP program in the table. The priority system that has been established will guide the execution of the 

projects. 

CAP projects and studies are listed in the CG table immediately 

preceding this section. This listing includes the priority projects 

listed in the President’s budget request as well as those that were 

requested by Members. The Committee has not provided dollar 

amounts for the named projects in the report. This lack of specificity in project amounts is intended to give the Chief of Engineers 

flexibility within the various sections of the CAP program in order 

to address the backlog. The Committee has repeated the guidance 

below from the fiscal year 2009 statement of the managers that accompanied Public Law 111–8 detailing how the Corps should 

prioritize work in the CAP program. 

The Corps shall give first priority to the projects listed in the tables in this report. For each CAP section, available funds over and 

above the amounts specified shall be allocated to the projects listed 

in the table for that section, including projects with specified 

amounts, in the following sequence of steps until the funds are exhausted: 

—capability-level funds for ongoing projects that have executed 

cost sharing agreements for the applicable phase; 

—capability-level funds for projects that are ready for execution 

of new cost sharing agreements for the applicable phase and 

for which Corps headquarters authorizes execution of the 

agreements; 

—funds, as permitted by Corps policies, for other projects previously funded for the applicable phase but not ready for execution of new cost sharing agreements; and 

—funds as permitted by Corps policies, for projects not previously funded for the applicable phase. 

Within the step at which available funds are exhausted for each 

CAP section, funds shall be allocated to the projects in that section 

that rank high according to the following factors: high overall performance based on outputs; high percent fiscally complete; high unobligated carry-in; and listing in any conference report or statement of managers from fiscal year 2004 through fiscal year 2009. 

Section 14 funds shall be allocated to the projects that address the 

most significant risks and adverse consequences, irrespective of 

phase or previous funding history. 

The Corps shall continue the ongoing process for suspending and 

terminating inactive projects. Suspended projects shall not be reactivated or funded unless the sponsor reaffirms in writing its sup-
50 

port for the project and establishes its willingness and capability 

to execute its project responsibilities. 

In order to provide a mix of studies, design, and construction 

within each CAP section, the Corps is directed to divide the funding generally 80/20 between the design and implementation and 

the feasibility phases within each authority. The Chief of Engineers 

shall provide a report to the Committees on Appropriations within 

30 days of enactment of this act detailing how funds will be distributed to the individual items in the various CAP sections for the fiscal year. The Chief shall also provide an annual report at the end 

of each fiscal year detailing the progress made on the backlog of 

projects. The report should include the completions and terminations as well as progress of ongoing work. 

The Corps is directed not to initiate any new continuing authorities projects in sections 205, 206, 208, or 1135 without explicit congressional direction. New projects may be initiated in the remaining sections after an assessment is made that such projects can be 

funded over time based on historical averages of the appropriation 

for that section and after prior approval by the Committees on Appropriations. 

FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARKANSAS, ILLINOIS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, AND TENNESSEE

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $383,823,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 248,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 340,000,000 

1 Excludes emergency funds of $375,000,000. 

This appropriation funds planning, construction, and operation 

and maintenance activities associated with water resource projects 

located in the lower Mississippi River Valley from Cape Girardeau, 

Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico. 

The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 

shown on the following table: 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Fiscal year 2009 

budget request 

Fiscal year 2010 

recommendation 

INVESTIGATIONS 

ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA ................................................................................................ 1,000 1,000 

DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA ....................................................................................... 400 400 

COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS ...................................................... 84 350 

MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT STUDY, TN & MS .......................................... 100 100 

QUIVER RIVER, MS .................................................................................................................. ........................ 160 

SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR ..................................................................................................... ........................ 300 

SPRING BAYOU, LA .................................................................................................................. ........................ 350 

COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ............................................................................... 500 1,665 

CONSTRUCTION 

CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, TN ........................................................... 47,721 47,721 

GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR ................................................................................................... ........................ 10,000 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN. ................................................... 28,874 45,439 

ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO ................................................................................................ ........................ 3,700 

ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA ....................................................................... 2,664 3,000 

ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA ......................................................................................................... 5,834 15,000 
51 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Fiscal year 2009 

budget request 

Fiscal year 2010 

recommendation 

MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA .............................................................................................. 2,250 2,250 

YAZOO BASIN—BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS ......................................................................... ........................ 3,200 

YAZOO BASIN—DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS ............................................................... ........................ 23,200 

YAZOO BASIN—MAIN STEM, MS ............................................................................................. ........................ 25 

YAZOO BASIN—REFORMULATION UNIT, MS ........................................................................... ........................ 1,500 

YAZOO BASIN—UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS ....................................................................... ........................ 13,000 

YAZOO BASIN—BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU ................................................................. ........................ 75 

YAZOO BASIN—YAZOO BACKWATER, MS ............................................................................... ........................ 629 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN ........................................................ 67,350 67,350 

HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR ................................................................................ 211 400 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR ................................................................................ 425 425 

LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR .......................................................................... 223 223 

LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR .......................................................................... 150 175 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN .................................................... 8,011 11,708 

WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR ................................................................................................ 1,217 1,217 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL ................................................................................. 191 191 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY ................................................................................ 100 100 

ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA ....................................................................... 2,532 2,532 

ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA ......................................................................................................... 12,374 12,374 

BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA ........................................................................... 43 43 

BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA ............................................................................... 54 54 

BONNET CARRE, LA ................................................................................................................. 2,415 3,500 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA ................................................................................ 1,716 1,716 

MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, CAERNARVON, LA ...................................................................... 358 1,800 

OLD RIVER, LA ......................................................................................................................... 9,739 10,200 

LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA ....................................................................... 100 100 

TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA ......................................................... 2,485 2,485 

TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA .......................................................................... 3,660 3,660 

GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS ....................................................................................................... 24 500 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS ............................................................................... 25 25 

VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS ........................................................................................................ 42 537 

YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS ..................................................................................... 6,091 6,870

YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS ........................................................................... 154 2,400 

YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS ................................................................................................ 5,915 7,640 

YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS ............................................................................................ 807 807 

YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS ......................................................................................... 6,331 7,381 

YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS ............................................................................................... 1,733 2,800 

YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS ............................................................................................ 7,329 9,183 

YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS ............................................................................................ 778 825

YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS ............................................................ 332 400 

YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS ........................................................................ 544 544 

YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS .............................................................................................. 731 731 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO ............................................................................... 150 150 

ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO ................................................................................................ 6,243 9,843 

WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO ........................................................................................................... 5,416 5,416 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN ................................................................................ 45 45 

MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN ............................................................................... 1,417 1,417 

REMAINING ITEMS: 

MAPPING ......................................................................................................................... 1,112 1,112 

REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE .............................................................................. ........................ ¥11,943 

TOTAL ......................................................................................................................... 248,000 340,000 

GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS

Quiver River, Mississippi.—The Committee has recommended 

$160,000 to continue studies to identify options for improving water 

quality while addressing other needs to create a situation where 
52 

additional development could be accommodated without adversely 

impacting fish and wildlife habitat. 

Southeast Arkansas, Arkansas.—The Committee recommends 

$300,000 to continue feasibility studies of current flooding, ecosystem restoration and water supply problems and needs throughout the 1.2 million-acre watershed. 

CONSTRUCTION

Grand Prairie, Arkansas.—The Committee has recommended 

$10,000,000 for continued construction of the project. 

Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, 

Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.—Additional funds above the 

budget request could be used for the following activities: to fully 

fund relief wells at Delta, Mississippi; Linda, Missouri; VidaliaMoreville, Louisiana, Item 365–R; and continue design efforts. 

Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower Basin, Mississippi.—The Committee 

recognizes the need for control of bank erosion along the Big Sunflower River and has recommended $3,200,000 for the continued 

construction of the Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River Project. 

$2,00,000 is recommended to continue bank stabilization erosion 

repairs at selected sites in the Sunflower Basin. 

The Committee expects the water quality funds to be used for 

the monitoring and establishment of water quality reference indicators and the development of Total Maximum Daily Loads target 

loads on Yazoo Basin projects. 

Yazoo Basin, Delta Headwaters Project, Mississippi.—The Committee has recommended $23,200,000 to continue construction of 

this erosion protection projects in the Yazoo Basin. 

Yazoo Basin, Upper Yazoo Project, Mississippi.—The Committee 

has recommended $13,000,000 to continue construction of this flood 

control project. 

MAINTENANCE

Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, 

Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.—Funds provided above the 

budget request are recommended for resurfacing the mainline levee 

at various reaches to be determined throughout the Memphis District; levee slide repairs; provide gravel for levees; operation and 

maintenance of LMRMRIS [MV MISSISSIPPI IV]; and mitigation 

in the Vicksburg District. 

Mississippi Lakes.—The Committee has recommended additional 

funding to address the maintenance backlog at Arkabutla, Sardis, 

Enid, and Grenada Lakes in Mississippi. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL

Appropriations, 2009 1 ........................................................................... $2,201,900,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 2,504,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,450,000,000 

1 Excludes emergency appropriations of $2,117,875,000. 

This appropriation funds operation, maintenance, and related activities at the water resources projects that the Corps operates and 

maintains. Work to be accomplished consists of dredging, repair, 

and operation of structures and other facilities, as authorized in 
53 

the various River and Harbor, Flood Control, and Water Resources 

Development Acts. Related activities include aquatic plant control, 

monitoring of completed projects where appropriate, removal of 

sunken vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce statistics. 

The O&M budget request appears to have been increased by $302,100,000 above the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount. However 

this is a little misleading. As was pointed out in the CG table, 

$47,067,000 in projects appears to have been inadvertently funded 

under O&M rather than CG. Once these projects are shifted back 

to CG, the increase is still $255,033,000 when compared to the fiscal year 2009 enacted amount. This moderate increase is a step in 

the right direction after years of flat budgets. The Committee also 

acknowledges that the administration has returned to the tradition 

of displaying the O&M budget on a project by project basis. With the $47,067,000 in CG items removed from the O&M request, the effective O&M request is $2,456,933,000 rather than the 

$2,504,000,000 presented in the budget request. A list of these migrated projects is displayed under the CG heading earlier in this 

report. 

Maintenance of our aging water infrastructure inventory gets 

more expensive every year, however, it is consistently underfunded. 

If this trend continues, the Corps will not be able to maintain expected levels of service at all of its projects. The Committee has 

maintained its tradition of supporting what the budget request 

terms as ‘‘low use harbors and waterways’’. The Committee recognizes the importance of these facilities and will continue to provide 

funding for them. The Committee is pleased that the Administration provided a modest increase to O&M; however, this increase 

needs to be a commitment for upcoming fiscal years to provide the 

resources necessary to deal with our aging infrastructure. 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee 

recommendation 

ALABAMA 

ALABAMA-COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER STUDY, AL ...................................................... 253 253 

ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL ................................................................................................. 16,785 16,785 

BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL .................................................................. 24,180 24,180 

GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL .................................................................................. 5,735 5,735 

MOBILE HARBOR, AL ........................................................................................................... 23,996 23,996 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL ..................................................................................... 100 100 

TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL & ..................................... 2,100 2,500 

TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS .................................................................. 22,978 25,000 

WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA .................................................................. 8,972 8,972 

WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL ...................................................................... 76 76 

ALASKA 

ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK ................................................................................................... 18,659 18,659 

CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK ..................................................................................................... 2,816 2,816 

DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK ................................................................................................... 885 885

HOMER HARBOR, AK ........................................................................................................... 400 400 

KODIAK HARBOR, AK ........................................................................................................... .......................... 240 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK ............................................................................ 168 168 

NOME HARBOR, AK ............................................................................................................. 820 820 

PETERSBURG NORTH HARBOR, AK ..................................................................................... .......................... 500 
54 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK ..................................................................................... 930 930 

ARIZONA 

ALAMO LAKE, AZ ................................................................................................................. 1,542 1,542 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ ............................................................................ 199 199 

PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ ..................................................................................................... 1,320 1,320 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ ........................................................................ 31 31 

WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ .................................................................................................. 300 300 

ARKANSAS 

BEAVER LAKE, AR ................................................................................................................ 8,864 8,864 

BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR ............................................................................. 6,579 7,079 

BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR .................................................................................................. 1,914 1,914 

BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR ...................................................................................................... 14,234 14,484 

DARDANELLE LOCK & DAM, AR .......................................................................................... 9,754 9,754 

DEGRAY LAKE, AR ............................................................................................................... 6,503 7,003 

DEQUEEN LAKE, AR ............................................................................................................. 1,752 1,752 

DIERKS LAKE, AR ................................................................................................................. 1,360 1,360 

GILLHAM LAKE, AR .............................................................................................................. 1,366 1,366 

GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR ................................................................................................... 7,759 7,759 

HELENA HARBOR, AR .......................................................................................................... 40 40 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR ............................................................................ 673 673 

MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR ......................................... 40,016 40,016 

MILLWOOD LAKE, AR ........................................................................................................... 5,122 5,122 

NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR .................................................................................. 4,505 5,005 

NIMROD LAKE, AR ............................................................................................................... 2,289 2,289 

NORFORK LAKE, AR ............................................................................................................. 5,717 5,717 

OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR ........................................................................................................ 397 800 

OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA ....................................................................... 9,605 9,605 

OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK & DAM, AR .............................................................................. 5,725 5,725 

WHITE RIVER, AR ................................................................................................................ 40 40 

YELLOW BEND PORT, AR ..................................................................................................... 4 115 

CALIFORNIA 

BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA ...................................................................................................... 2,234 2,234 

BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA ........................................................................... 2,041 2,041 

COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA .................................................................... 3,829 3,829 

DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE & CHANNEL, CA ........................................................ 5,139 5,139 

FARMINGTON DAM, CA ........................................................................................................ 481 481 

HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA ....................................................................................... 2,170 2,170 

HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA ..................................................................................... 3,010 3,010 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA ............................................................................ 6,702 6,702 

ISABELLA LAKE, CA ............................................................................................................. 1,802 1,802 

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA ...................................................................... 4,597 4,597 

MARINA DEL REY, CA .......................................................................................................... .......................... 3,000 

MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA ......................................................................................... 451 451 

MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA ..................................................................................................... 288 288 

MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA ................................................................................................... 3,300 3,300 

NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA ........................................................................................................ 2,515 2,515 

NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, CA ........................................................... 1,898 1,898 

NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA ............................................................................................... 1,780 1,780 

OAKLAND HARBOR, CA ........................................................................................................ 9,255 9,255 

OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA .................................................................................................... 1,500 1,500 

PINE FLAT LAKE, CA ............................................................................................................ 3,201 3,201 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA ..................................................................................... 2,442 2,442 

REDWOOD CITY HARBOR ..................................................................................................... 6,745 6,745 

RICHMOND HARBOR, CA ..................................................................................................... 9,589 9,589 

SACRAMENTO RIVER (30-FOOT PROJECT), CA .................................................................... 3,351 3,351 

SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA. ...................................... 1,712 1,712 

SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL, CA ......................................................... 234 234 

SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA ....................................................... 1,118 1,118 
55 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA (DRIFT REMOVAL) ............................................... 2,945 2,945 

SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA ............................................................................................. 3,237 3,237 

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA ................................................................... 3,554 3,554 

SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA ................................................................ 2,650 2,650 

SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA ............................................................................................. 3,094 3,094 

SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA ............................................................................................ 1,690 1,690

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA ........................................................................ 1,915 1,915 

SUCCESS LAKE, CA ............................................................................................................. 1,989 1,989 

SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA ................................................................................................. 4,019 4,019 

TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA .................................................................................... 2,037 2,037 

VENTURA HARBOR, CA ........................................................................................................ 6,426 6,426 

YUBA RIVER, CA .................................................................................................................. 146 146 

COLORADO 

BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO ....................................................................................................... 395 395 

CHATFIELD LAKE, CO ........................................................................................................... 1,442 1,442 

CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO ................................................................................................... 1,999 1,999 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO ........................................................................... 773 773 

JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO ............................................................................................ 2,554 2,554 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO ........................................................................ 612 612 

TRINIDAD LAKE, CO ............................................................................................................. 960 960 

CONNECTICUT 

BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT ........................................................................................................ 1,436 1,436 

COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT .............................................................................................. 615 615 

HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT ................................................................................................ 442 442 

HOP BROOK LAKE, CT ......................................................................................................... 917 917 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT ............................................................................ 392 392 

LONG ISLAND SOUND DMMP, CT ........................................................................................ 2,000 2,000 

MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT ............................................................................................ 861 861 

MYSTIC RIVER, CT ............................................................................................................... 250 250 

NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT ............................................................................................ 610 610 

NORWALK HARBOR, CT ....................................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT ..................................................................................... 1,050 1,050 

STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT ................................................................................. 434 434 

THOMASTON DAM, CT .......................................................................................................... 1,136 1,136 

WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT ................................................................................................. 569 569 

DELAWARE 

DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TO LEWES BEACH .................................... 350 ..........................

HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE ....................................................................................... .......................... 200 

INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE R TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, D .................................. 28,390 28,390 

INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, D .................................. 70 70 

MISPILLION RIVER, DE ........................................................................................................ 30 30 

MURDERKILL RIVER, DE ...................................................................................................... 30 30

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE ..................................................................................... 105 105 

WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE .................................................................................................. 320 2,320 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC ........................................................................... 140 140 

POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVER, DC (DRIFT REMOVAL) .................................................. 805 805 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC .................................................................................... 30 30 

WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC ................................................................................................. 25 25 

FLORIDA 

CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL ..................................................................................................... 4,600 4,600 

CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL .................................................................................. 23,876 23,876 

ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL ................................................................................ 56 56 

FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL ................................................................................................... 1,625 1,625 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL ............................................................................ 1,200 1,200 

INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE .................................. 780 2,000 
56 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL .................................................. 500 689 

JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL 1 .............................................................................................. 7,035 6,035 

JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA ........................................ 9,732 9,732 

OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL .............................................................................................. 2,357 2,357 

PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL .................................................................................................. 3,225 3,225 

PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL .................................................................................................. 2,055 2,055 

PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL ..................................................................................................... 67 67 

PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL ................................................................................................. 600 600

PORT ST. JOE, FL, DMMP .................................................................................................... .......................... 500 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL ..................................................................................... 1,300 1,300 

REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL ................................................................................... 4,445 4,445 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL ......................................................................... 30 30 

ST. LUCIE INLET, FL ............................................................................................................ 350 350 

TAMPA HARBOR, FL ............................................................................................................. 5,620 5,620 

WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL ...................................................................... 380 380 

GEORGIA 

ALLATOONA LAKE, GA .......................................................................................................... 7,077 7,077 

APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, GA, AL & ....................................... 2,437 2,437 

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA ........................................................................... 265 1,000 

BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA ................................................................................................... 7,156 7,156 

BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA ..................................................................... 8,924 8,924 

CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA ............................................................................................. 8,318 8,318 

HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC .................................................................................................. 11,999 11,999 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, GA ........................................... 48 48 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA ............................................................................ 108 108 

J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC ................................................................................. 10,316 10,316 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA ..................................................................................... 151 151 

RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC .................................................................... 9,209 9,209 

SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA 1 ................................................................................................... 15,087 14,187 

SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA ............................................................................. 274 574 

WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL ............................................................................... 9,591 9,591 

HAWAII 

BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI .............................................................................................. 201 201 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI ............................................................................. 705 705 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI ...................................................................................... 570 570 

IDAHO 

ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID ........................................................................................................ 1,545 1,545 

DWORKSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID .............................................................................. 2,875 2,875 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID ............................................................................. 324 324 

LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID ......................................................................................................... 2,597 2,597 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID ......................................................................... 484 484 

ILLINOIS 

CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN 1 ........................................................................... 4,621 3,120 

CARLYLE LAKE, IL ................................................................................................................ 5,171 5,171 

CHICAGO HARBOR, IL .......................................................................................................... 3,889 3,889 

CHICAGO RIVER, IL ............................................................................................................. 493 493 

FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL ............................................................................................ 352 352 

ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVR PORTION) .................................................................... 1,748 2,648 

ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVS PORTION) .................................................................... 31,736 31,736 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, IL ............................................. 65 65 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL ............................................................................. 1,298 1,298 

KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL ...................................................................................... 2,148 2,148

LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL ........................................................................................... 683 683 

LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL ......................................................................................................... 5,454 5,454 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS ................................... 58,714 58,714 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BTWN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS ......................................... 22,227 22,227 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL ...................................................................................... 104 104 
57 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

REND LAKE, IL ..................................................................................................................... 5,386 5,386 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IL ...................................................... 685 685 

WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL ...................................................................................................... 492 492 

INDIANA 

BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN ......................................................................................................... 862 862 

BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN ......................................................................................... 165 165 

CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN ........................................................................................................ 892 892 

CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN ................................................................................................ 1,027 1,027 

INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY, IN 1 ...................................................... 13,500 ..........................

INDIANA HARBOR, IN ........................................................................................................... 2,330 2,330 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN ............................................................................. 709 709 

J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN ............................................................................................... 944 944 

MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN ...................................................................................................... 974 974 

MONROE LAKE, IN ............................................................................................................... 1,101 1,101 

PATOKA LAKE, IN ................................................................................................................. 887 887 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN ...................................................................................... 185 185 

SALAMONIE LAKE, IN ........................................................................................................... 904 904 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IN ..................................................... 126 126 

IOWA 

CORALVILLE LAKE, IA .......................................................................................................... 3,381 3,381 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA ............................................................................. 483 483 

MISSOURI RIVER—KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA ............................................. 129 129 

MISSOURI RIVER—RULO TO THE MOUTH, IA, KS, MO & NE ............................................. 6,059 7,000 

MISSOURI RIVER—SIOUX CITY TO RULO, IA, KS, MO & NE .............................................. 2,610 2,610 

RATHBUN LAKE, IA .............................................................................................................. 3,019 3,019 

RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA ......................................................................... 3,978 4,567 

SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA ......................................................................................................... 4,685 5,032 

KANSAS 

CLINTON LAKE, KS ............................................................................................................... 2,073 2,073 

COUNCIL GRAVE LAKE, KS .................................................................................................. 1,739 1,739 

EL DORADO LAKE, KS .......................................................................................................... 786 786 

ELK CITY LAKE, KS .............................................................................................................. 718 718 

FALL RIVER LAKE, KS .......................................................................................................... 1,283 1,283 

HILLSDALE LAKE, KS ............................................................................................................ 860 860 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS ............................................................................ 220 220 

JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS ........................................................................ 3,685 3,685 

KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS ........................................................................................................... 2,288 2,288 

MARION LAKE, KS ................................................................................................................ 1,820 1,820 

MELVERN LAKE, KS ............................................................................................................. 2,151 2,151 

MILFORD LAKE, KS .............................................................................................................. 2,057 2,057 

PEARSON-SKUBITZ BILL HILL LAKE, KS .............................................................................. 1,472 1,472 

PERRY LAKE, KS .................................................................................................................. 2,015 2,015 

POMONA LAKE, KS ............................................................................................................... 2,047 2,047 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS ........................................................................ 100 100 

TORONTO LAKE, KS ............................................................................................................. 3,522 3,522 

TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS ..................................................................................................... 2,062 2,062 

WILSON LAKE, KS ................................................................................................................ 1,717 2,017 

KENTUCKY 

BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE, BARKLEY, KY & TN ................................................................... 10,393 10,393 

BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY .................................................................................................... 2,514 2,514 

BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY ..................................................................................................... 1,710 1,710 

BUCKHORN LAKE, KY .......................................................................................................... 1,585 1,585 

CARR CREEK LAKE, KY ....................................................................................................... 1,737 1,737 

CAVE RUN LAKE, KY ............................................................................................................ 926 926 

DEWEY LAKE, KY ................................................................................................................. 1,775 1,775 

ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY ................................................................................ 40 40 

FISHTRAP LAKE, KY ............................................................................................................. 2,171 2,171 
58 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

GRAYSON LAKE, KY ............................................................................................................. 1,709 1,709 

GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY ....................................................................................... 1,880 1,880 

GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY ...................................................................................................... 2,202 2,202 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY ............................................................................ 665 665 

KENTUCKY RIVER, KY .......................................................................................................... 10 10 

LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY ..................................................................................................... 1,927 1,927 

MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY .................................................................................................... 814 814 

MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY ................................................................. 113 113 

NOLIN LAKE, KY ................................................................................................................... 2,477 2,477 

OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN & OH ............................................................... 40,748 40,748 

OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, IN & OH ......................................................... 5,836 5,836 

PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY ......................................................................................................... 1,231 1,231 

ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY ...................................................................................................... 2,742 2,742 

TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY ...................................................................................................... 1,104 1,104 

WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY ....................................................................... 7,835 7,835 

YATESVILLE LAKE, KY .......................................................................................................... 1,143 1,143 

LOUISIANA 

ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF & BLACK, LA ...................................... 11,640 11,640 

BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA ......................................................................................... 165 165 

BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA ......................................................................................... 954 954 

BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP WATERWAY, LA .............................................. 1,211 1,211 

BAYOU PIERRE, LA .............................................................................................................. 24 24 

BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA ...................................................................................... 49 49 

BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILLION RIVER, LA ........................................................................ 15 15 

BAYOU TECHE, LA ............................................................................................................... 200 200 

CADDO LAKE, LA ................................................................................................................. 224 224 

CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA ........................................................................................ 17,968 23,968 

FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA .................................................................................................... 2,235 2,235 

GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA .................................................................................. 24,777 24,777 

HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA .......................................................................................... 2,569 2,569

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA ............................................................................ 1,487 1,487 

J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA ................................................................................ 10,598 13,598 

LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA ......................................................................................... 22 500 

MADISON PARISH PORT, LA ................................................................................................ 7 99 

MERMENTAU RIVER, LA ....................................................................................................... 1,913 1,913 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA ...................................................................... 2,838 2,838 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, .......................................... 54,994 54,994 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA ..................................................................................... 65 65 

REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA ................................................................................... 1,410 1,410 

WALLACE LAKE, LA .............................................................................................................. 244 244 

WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA ...................................................................... 47 47 

WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA ................................ 48 48 

MAINE 

BASS HARBOR, TREMONT, ME ............................................................................................ .......................... 60 

BUCKS HARBOR, MACHIASPORT, ME .................................................................................. .......................... 750 

DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME ...................................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME ........................................................................... 215 215 

INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES, ME ................................................................................. 17 17 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME .................................................................................... 750 750 

MARYLAND 

ASSATEAGUE, MD ................................................................................................................ 1,000 ..........................

BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNEL (50 FOOT), MD .......................................................... 15,513 20,000 

BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL) ...................................................................... 360 360 

CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV .............................................................................. 177 177 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD ........................................................................... 155 155 

JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV ............................................................................... 1,779 1,779 

OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD ........................................... .......................... 1,400 

POPLAR ISLAND, MD ............................................................................................................ 8,200 ..........................
59 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD .................................................................................... 400 400 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD ....................................................................... 108 108 

SOMERSET COUNTY CHANNELS, MD ................................................................................... .......................... 1,000 

WICOMICO RIVER, MD ......................................................................................................... 1,676 1,676 

MASSACHUSETTS 

BARRE FALLS DAM, MA ....................................................................................................... 753 753 

BIRCH HILL DAM, MA .......................................................................................................... 1,203 1,203 

BOSTON HARBOR, MA ......................................................................................................... 7,000 7,000 

BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA ...................................................................................................... 836 836 

CAPE COD CANAL, MA ........................................................................................................ 13,263 13,263 

CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREA, MA ..................................................... 275 275 

CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA .................................................................................................. 210 210 

EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA ................................................................................................. 950 950

HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA ................................................................................................. 567 567 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA ........................................................................... 414 414 

KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA ........................................................................................................ 1,421 1,421 

LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA ......................................................................................................... 889 889 

NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA ................................................................... 500 500 

NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET HURRICANE BARRIER, ................................... 619 619 

NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA .............................................................................................. .......................... 350 

PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA ..................................................................................................... 200 200

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA .................................................................................... 1,200 1,200 

TULLY LAKE, MA .................................................................................................................. 666 666 

WEST HILL DAM, MA ........................................................................................................... 572 572 

WESTVILLE LAKE, MA .......................................................................................................... 784 784 

MICHIGAN 

CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI ...................................................................................... 1,636 1,636

CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI ................................................................................................... 203 203

DETROIT RIVER, MI ............................................................................................................. 5,415 5,415 

GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI ................................................................................................ 820 820 

HOLLAND HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................................ 2,151 2,151 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI ............................................................................ 158 158 

KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI ................................................................................................. 37 37 

MICHIGAN HARBOR DREDGING, MI ..................................................................................... .......................... 7,000 

ALPENA HARBOR, MI .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

ARCADIA HARBOR, MI ................................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

AU SABLE, MI ............................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BAY PORT HARBOR, MI .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BIG BAY HARBOR, MI ................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

BLACK RIVER (GOGEBIC), MI ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

BOLLES HARBOR, MI .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

CLINTON RIVER, MI .................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

EAGLE HARBOR, MI .................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI ............................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

INLAND ROUTE, MI ..................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LELAND HARBOR, MI .................................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

LES CHENEAUX ISLAND CHANNELS, MI ..................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI ............................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI ............................................................................................ .......................... ..........................

MANISTEE HARBOR, MI .............................................................................................. .......................... ..........................

MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PENTWATER HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI ..................................................................................... .......................... ..........................
60 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI ......................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

PORTAGE HARBOR, MI ............................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

ROUGE RIVER, MI ....................................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI ....................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... ..........................

ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI ................................................................................................... 1,122 1,122 

PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI ................................................................................................ 335 335 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI ..................................................................................... 410 410 

SAGINAW RIVER, MI ............................................................................................................. 3,624 3,624 

SEBEWAING RIVER, MI ........................................................................................................ 1,200 1,200 

ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI ........................................................................................................... 533 533 

ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI ..................................................................................................... 755 755 

ST. MARYS RIVER, MI ......................................................................................................... 23,010 23,010 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MI ..................................................... 2,612 2,612 

MINNESOTA 

BIGSTONE LAKE—WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & SD ............................................................... 276 276 

DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI .............................................................................. 5,985 5,985 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN ........................................................................... 633 633 

LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN ................................................................. 627 627 

MINNESOTA RIVER, MN ....................................................................................................... 256 256 

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS ................................... 44,130 44,130 

ORWELL LAKE, MN ............................................................................................................... 533 533 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN .................................................................................... 82 82 

RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN ................................................................................................. 150 150 

RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN ................................................ 3,398 3,398 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MN ................................................... 359 359 

TWO HARBORS, MN ............................................................................................................. 350 350 

MISSISSIPPI 

BILOXI HARBOR, MS ............................................................................................................ 1,250 1,250 

CLAIRBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS ........................................................................................ 2 74 

EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS ................................................................................... 187 187 

GULFPORT HARBOR, MS ...................................................................................................... 3,470 5,000 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS ........................................................................... 183 183 

MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS ............................................................................................. 40 112 

OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS .......................................................................................................... 1,703 1,703 

PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS ................................................................................................. 7,505 10,900 

PEARL RIVER, MS & LA ...................................................................................................... 193 193 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS .................................................................................... 75 75 

ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS ..................................................................................................... 15 600 

WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS ..................................................................... 66 66 

YAZOO RIVER, MS ............................................................................................................... 35 154 

MISSOURI 

CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO .......................................................................................... 40 800 

CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE, MO ..................................................... 6,813 6,813 

CLEARWATER LAKE, MO ...................................................................................................... 2,933 3,018 

HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO ................................................................... 9,393 9,393 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO ........................................................................... 1,491 1,491 

LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO .......................................................................................... 845 845 

LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO .................................................................................................... 949 949

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (R ........................................ 23,403 23,403 

NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO ................................................................................................. 90 400 

NEW MADRID HARBOR (MILE 889), MO .............................................................................. 40 240 

POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO .............................................................................................. 2,231 2,231 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO ....................................................................... 327 327 

SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO ......................................................................................................... 1,850 1,850 

STOCKTON LAKE, MO ........................................................................................................... 4,370 4,370 
61 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR ............................................................................................. 7,550 7,550 

UNION LAKE, MO ................................................................................................................. 6 6 

MONTANA 

FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT ............................................................................................. 6,361 6,361 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT ........................................................................... 115 115 

LIBBY DAM, MT ................................................................................................................... 1,948 1,948 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT ........................................................................ 145 145 

NEBRASKA 

GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE AND SD ................................................ 8,165 8,165 

HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE ................................................................................................. 2,312 2,312 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE ............................................................................ 714 714 

PAPILLION CREEK, NE ......................................................................................................... 847 847 

SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE .................................................................................... 1,079 1,079 

NEVADA 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV ............................................................................ 63 63 

MARTIS CREEK LAKE, CA & NV .......................................................................................... 1,192 1,192

PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV ......................................................................... 341 341 

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

BLACKWATER DAM, NH ....................................................................................................... 610 610 

COCHECO RIVER DREDGING PROJECT, NH ......................................................................... .......................... 2,000 

EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH ......................................................................................... 560 560 

FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH .................................................................................................. 1,921 1,921 

HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH ........................................................................................ 1,148 1,148 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH ........................................................................... 126 126 

OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH ..................................................................................................... 553 553 

PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, NH ......................................................... 500 500 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH .................................................................................... 275 275 

SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH ............................................................................................... 760 760 

NEW JERSEY 

ABSECON INLET, NJ ............................................................................................................. .......................... 250 

BARNEGAT INLET, NJ ........................................................................................................... 225 225 

CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ ....................................................................... 200 ..........................

COLD SPRING INLET, NJ ...................................................................................................... 250 250 

DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ ...................................................................................... 15 15 

DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA, NJ, PA & DE ............................................ 19,600 19,600 

DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO TRENTON, NJ ..................................................... 820 820 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ ............................................................................ 205 205 

LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NJ .......................................................... 400 ..........................

MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ ....................................................................................................... 160 160 

NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ ...................................................................... 250 250 

NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ ...................................................... 150 150 

PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ .................................................................... 553 553 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ ..................................................................................... 1,653 1,653 

RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ ................................................................... 200 200 

RARITAN RIVER, NJ ............................................................................................................. 120 500 

SALEM RIVER, NJ ................................................................................................................ 100 100 

SHARK RIVER, NJ ................................................................................................................ 400 400 

SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ ........................................................................ 80 80 

NEW MEXICO 

ABIQUIU DAM, NM ............................................................................................................... 3,305 3,305 

COCHITI LAKE, NM ............................................................................................................... 6,876 6,876 

CONCHAS LAKE, NM ............................................................................................................ 1,796 1,796 

GALISTEO DAM, NM ............................................................................................................. 591 591 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM ........................................................................... 639 639 

JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM ................................................................................................... 756 756 
62 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PRO .................................. 3,150 3,150 

SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM ....................................................................................... 1,099 1,099 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM ....................................................................... 477 477 

TWO RIVERS DAM, NM ........................................................................................................ 404 404 

UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY, NM ........................................... 4,188 4,188 

NEW YORK 

ALMOND LAKE, NY ............................................................................................................... 524 524 

ARKPORT DAM, NY .............................................................................................................. 298 298 

BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY ..................................................... 1,503 1,503 

BUFFALO HARBOR, NY ........................................................................................................ 1,325 1,325 

BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY ................................................................................................. 1,760 1,760 

EAST RIVER, NY ................................................................................................................... 300 300 

EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY ................................................................................................ 2,950 2,950 

EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY ....................................................................................................... 588 588 

EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY ................................................................................................... 4,090 4,090 

FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY ............................................................................ 150 150 

FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY .......................................................................................... 60 60 

GREAT KILLS HARBOR, S.I., NY ........................................................................................... 60 60 

GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY ....................................................................................................... 60 60

HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY ............................................................................................. 60 60 

HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT) ............................................................................................... 1,270 1,270 

HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C) ............................................................................................... 1,550 1,550 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY ............................................................................ 898 898 

JAMAICA BAY, NY ................................................................................................................ 220 220 

JONES INLET, NY ................................................................................................................. 150 150 

LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY .............................................................................................. 100 100 

LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY ........................................................................................ 5 5 

LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY .................................................................... 100 100 

MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY ..................................................................................................... 60 60 

MORICHES INLET, NY .......................................................................................................... 100 100 

MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY ................................................................................................... 2,696 2,696 

NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY .................................................................... 4,100 4,100 

NEW YORK HARBOR, NY ..................................................................................................... 3,698 3,698 

NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DE ................................... 1,045 1,045 

NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT REMOVAL) ............................................................... 7,000 7,000 

NEWTOWN CREEK, NY ......................................................................................................... 150 150 

OGDENSBURG HARBOR, NY ................................................................................................ .......................... 70 

OSWEGO HARBOR, NY ......................................................................................................... .......................... 300 

PORT CHESTER HARBOR, NY .............................................................................................. 60 60 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY ..................................................................................... 2,123 2,123 

ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY ................................................................................................... 5 5 

SHINNECOCK INLET, NY ...................................................................................................... 100 100 

SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY .................................................... 807 807 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, NY .................................................... 579 579 

WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY .................................................................................................. 100 100 

WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY ................................................................................................... 685 685 

NORTH CAROLINA 

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC .......................................................................... 4,300 4,300 

B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC ........................................................................... 1,898 1,898 

BEAUFORT HARBOR, NC ...................................................................................................... .......................... 250 

BOGUE INLET, NC ................................................................................................................ .......................... 650 

CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC ....................................................................... 988 988 

CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC ............................................................................................... .......................... 500 

FALLS LAKE, NC ................................................................................................................... 1,859 1,859 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC ........................................................................... 244 244 

LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC ........................................................................................... .......................... 600 

MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC ....................................................................................... 3,945 3,945 

MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC ...................................................... 2,300 2,300 

MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC ............................................................................................ 9,500 9,500
63 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

NEW RIVER INLET, NC ......................................................................................................... 700 700 

NEW TOPSAIL INLET, NC ..................................................................................................... .......................... 600 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC .................................................................................... 295 295 

ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC ................................................................................................... 50 50 

SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC .................................................................................................. 250 250

W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC ........................................................................ 3,421 3,421 

WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC .................................................................................................. 12,155 12,155 

NORTH DAKOTA 

BOWMAN HALEY, ND ........................................................................................................... 350 350 

GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND .............................................................................. 14,746 14,946 

HOMME LAKE, ND ................................................................................................................ 252 252 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND ........................................................................... 452 452 

LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND ........................................................................ 1,351 1,351 

PIPESTEM LAKE, ND ............................................................................................................ 496 496 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND ........................................................................ 138 138 

SOURIS RIVER, ND .............................................................................................................. 286 286 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ND .................................................... 35 35 

OHIO 

ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH ....................................................................................................... 1,545 1,545 

ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH .................................................................................................... 840 1,840 

BERLIN LAKE, OH ................................................................................................................ 2,198 2,198 

CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH ................................................................................................... 1,500 1,500 

CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM, OH ........................................................................................... 1,145 1,145

CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH .................................................................................................... 7,357 8,357 

CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH ..................................................................................................... 1,191 1,191 

DEER CREEK LAKE, OH ....................................................................................................... 1,481 1,481 

DELAWARE LAKE, OH ........................................................................................................... 1,322 1,322 

DILLON LAKE, OHIO ............................................................................................................. 1,366 1,366 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH ........................................................................... 555 555 

LORAIN HARBOR, OH ........................................................................................................... 880 880 

MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH ................................................................... 37 37 

MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH ................................................................. 1,089 1,089 

MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH ...................................................................................... 1,727 1,727 

MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH ............................................................................................... 995 995 

MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH ........................................................................................... 7,306 7,306

NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH ...................................................................... 274 274 

PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH ....................................................................................................... 1,216 1,216 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH .................................................................................... 295 295 

ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH .................................................................... 35 35 

SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH ..................................................................................................... 1,465 1,465 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OH .................................................... 234 234 

TOLEDO HARBOR, OH .......................................................................................................... 5,034 6,034 

TOM JENKINS DAM, OH ....................................................................................................... 894 894 

WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH ............................................................................... 745 745 

WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH ............................................................................................ 1,029 1,029 

OKLAHOMA 

ARCADIA LAKE, OK .............................................................................................................. 521 521 

BIRCH LAKE, OK .................................................................................................................. 902 902 

BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK ...................................................................................................... 3,202 3,202 

CANTON LAKE, OK ............................................................................................................... 2,217 2,217 

COPAN LAKE, OK ................................................................................................................. 1,035 1,035 

EUFAULA LAKE, OK .............................................................................................................. 6,620 6,620 

FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK ...................................................................................................... 11,768 11,768 

FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK ...................................................................................................... 1,104 1,104 

GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK ............................................................................................ 347 347 

HEYBURN LAKE, OK ............................................................................................................. 748 748 

HUGO LAKE, OK ................................................................................................................... 1,738 1,738 

HULAH LAKE, OK ................................................................................................................. 2,097 2,097 
64 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK ............................................................................ 255 255 

KAW LAKE, OK ..................................................................................................................... 2,751 2,751 

KEYSTONE LAKE, OK ............................................................................................................ 6,947 6,947 

MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK ......................................... 6,173 6,173 

OOLOGAH LAKE, OK ............................................................................................................. 4,106 4,106 

OPTIMA LAKE, OK ................................................................................................................ 219 219 

PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES, OK ................................................... 114 114 

PINE CREEK LAKE, OK ......................................................................................................... 1,276 1,276 

ROBERT S. KEER LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK .................................................... 8,441 8,441 

SARDIS LAKE, OK ................................................................................................................. 1,254 1,254 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK ........................................................................ 900 900 

SKIATOOK LAKE, OK ............................................................................................................. 1,414 1,414 

TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK ............................................................................................... 6,625 6,625 

WAURIKA LAKE, OK .............................................................................................................. 1,431 1,431 

WEBBERS FALLS LOCK & DAM, OK ..................................................................................... 5,903 5,903 

WISTER LAKE, OK ................................................................................................................ 856 856 

OREGON 

APPLEGATE LAKE, OR .......................................................................................................... 1,302 1,302 

BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR ........................................................................................................ 940 940 

BONNEVILLE LOCK & DAM, OR & WA ................................................................................. 13,911 13,911 

CHETCO RIVER, OR ............................................................................................................. 909 909 

COLUMBIA & LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA .................................. 24,495 24,495 

COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA ...................................................................... 12,945 12,945 

COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA & THE DALLES, OR. ................................... 689 689 

COOS BAY, OR .................................................................................................................... 4,591 5,043 

COQUILLE RIVER, OR .......................................................................................................... 339 339 

COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR ................................................................................................. 1,130 1,130 

COUGAR LAKE, OR ............................................................................................................... 1,582 1,582 

DEPOE BAY, OR ................................................................................................................... .......................... 118 

DETROIT LAKE, OR ............................................................................................................... 949 949 

DORENA LAKE, OR ............................................................................................................... 1,160 1,160 

FALL CREEK LAKE, OR ........................................................................................................ 1,864 1,864 

FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR ........................................................................................................ 2,362 2,362 

GREEN PETER—FOSTER LAKES, OR ................................................................................... 3,650 3,650 

HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR ....................................................................................................... 843 843 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, OR ........................................... 34 34 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR ........................................................................... 636 636 

JOHN DAY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA ..................................................................................... 8,901 8,901 

LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR .................................................................................................. 2,766 2,766 

LOST CREEK LAKE, OR ........................................................................................................ 3,636 3,636 

MCNARY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA ....................................................................................... 7,137 7,137 

PORT ORFORD, OR .............................................................................................................. 38 38 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR .................................................................................... 200 200 

ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR ................................................................................... 565 565 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR ........................................................................ 69 69 

SIUSLAW RIVER, OR ............................................................................................................ 647 647 

SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR ..................................................................................................... 6 6 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OR .................................................... 10,400 10,400 

TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR ............................................................................................ 48 48 

UMPQUA RIVER, OR ............................................................................................................ 1,174 1,174 

WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR ................................................................. 87 918 

WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR ....................................................................... 41 41 

WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR ................................................................................................... 629 629

YAQUINA BAY & HARBOR, OR ............................................................................................. 1,790 1,790 

PENNSYLVANIA 

ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA ........................................................................................................ 9,039 9,039 

ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA ..................................................................................................... 659 659 

AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA ........................................................................................... 215 215 

BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA .......................................................................................................... 1,201 1,201 
65 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA ....................................................................................................... 2,696 2,696 

CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA ............................................................................................. 1,253 1,253 

COWANESQUE LAKE, PA ...................................................................................................... 1,889 1,889 

CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA ................................................................................................. 1,683 1,683 

CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA .................................................................................................... 757 757 

EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA ........................................................................... 1,524 1,524 

ERIE HARBOR, PA ................................................................................................................ 555 555 

FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA ...................................................................................... 674 674 

FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA .............................................................................................. 969 969 

GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA .......................................................... 224 224 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA ............................................................................ 880 880 

JOHNSTOWN, PA ................................................................................................................... 34 34 

KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA .................................................................. 1,338 1,338 

LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA ........................................................................................................ 1,346 1,346 

MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA ............................................................................................... 1,286 1,286 

MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA .................................................................................................. 16,758 16,758 

OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV ................................................................... 21,470 21,470 

OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & WV ............................................................ 516 516 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA ..................................................................................... 120 120 

PROMPTON LAKE, PA ........................................................................................................... 434 434 

PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA ............................................................................................................ 22 22 

RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA ........................................................................................................... 3,847 3,847 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA ........................................................................ 59 59 

SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA ....................................................................................................... 200 200 

SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA ................................................................................................ 6,992 6,992 

STILLWATER LAKE, PA ......................................................................................................... 452 452 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, PA .................................................... 98 98 

TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA ............................................................................................... 2,456 2,456 

TIONESTA LAKE, PA ............................................................................................................. 1,812 1,812 

UNION CITY LAKE, PA .......................................................................................................... 440 440 

WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA .............................................................................................. 1,041 1,041 

YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA .............................................................................................. 478 478 

YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD .............................................................................. 2,335 2,335 

PUERTO RICO 

SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR ....................................................................................................... 1,200 1,200 

RHODE ISLAND 

BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI ............................................................................. .......................... 1,250 

FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, RI .................................................................................. 500 500 

GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (NEW HARBOR) ..................................................... 100 200 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI ............................................................................. 48 48 

PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY & WATCH HILL ...................................... .......................... 200 

POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI .............................................................................. 300 300 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI ...................................................................................... 500 500 

PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI ................................................................... .......................... 300 

WOONSOCKET, RI ................................................................................................................ 200 200 

SOUTH CAROLINA 

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC ........................................................................... 795 1,295 

CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 1 ............................................................................................... 12,492 10,694 

COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC ....................................................................... 4,685 4,685 

GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC ................................................................................................ 250 1,250 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC ............................................................................ 70 70 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC ..................................................................................... 465 465 

SOUTH DAKOTA 

BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD ..................................................................................... 9,873 9,873 

CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, SD ............................................... .......................... 3,000

COLD BROOK LAKE, SD ....................................................................................................... 436 436 

COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD ....................................................................................... 271 271 
66 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD .................................................................. 12,210 12,210 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD ............................................................................ 75 75 

LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN ................................................................................................. 598 598 

OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND ...................................................................................... 11,816 11,816

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD ........................................................................ 81 81 

TENNESSEE 

CENTER HILL LAKE, TN ....................................................................................................... 6,143 6,143 

CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN .......................................................................................... 6,454 6,454 

CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN ..................................................................... 3,775 3,775 

CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN ......................................................................... 6,813 6,813 

DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN ...................................................................................................... 6,386 6,386 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN ............................................................................ 50 50 

J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN ....................................................................... 4,818 4,818 

OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN ..................................................................................... 12,304 12,304 

TENNESSEE RIVER, TN ........................................................................................................ 16,833 16,833 

WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN ................................................................................................... 373 373

TEXAS 

AQUILLA LAKE, TX ................................................................................................................ 1,564 1,564 

ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL-AREA VIII, ........................................ 1,558 1,558 

BARDWELL LAKE, TX ............................................................................................................ 2,229 2,229 

BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX .............................................................................................. 4,968 4,968 

BELTON LAKE, TX ................................................................................................................ 3,280 3,280 

BENBROOK LAKE, TX ........................................................................................................... 2,575 2,575 

BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX ............................................................................................. 3,388 3,388 

BUFFALO BAYOU & TRIBUTARIES, TX ................................................................................. 2,958 2,958 

CANYON LAKE, TX ................................................................................................................ 4,005 4,005 

CEDAR BAYOU, TX ............................................................................................................... 1,790 1,790 

CHANNEL TO HARLINGEN, TX .............................................................................................. 2,161 2,161 

CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX ......................................................................................... 383 383 

CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX .................................................................................. 4,523 4,523 

DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX & OK ............................................................................. 7,676 7,676 

ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT, TX ............................................................. 43 43 

FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O’ THE PINES, TX ............................................................... 3,485 3,485 

FREEPORT HARBOR, TX ....................................................................................................... 3,316 3,316 

GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX ............................................................................ 13,095 13,095 

GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX ...................................................................................... 2,264 2,264 

GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX ........................................................................................... 1,733 1,733

GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX ............................................................................................. 2,588 2,588 

GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX ........................................................................................................... 2,735 2,735 

GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX .................................................................................. 26,046 26,046 

HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX ..................................................................................................... 1,605 1,605 

HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX .............................................................................................. 15,063 15,063 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX ............................................................................ 1,520 1,520 

JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX ...................................................................................................... 1,718 1,718 

JOE POOL LAKE, TX ............................................................................................................. 1,096 1,096 

LAKE KEMP, TX .................................................................................................................... 327 327 

LAVON LAKE, TX .................................................................................................................. 3,497 3,497 

LEWISVILLE DAM, TX ........................................................................................................... 3,549 3,549 

MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX ......................................................................................... 4,627 4,627 

NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX ................................................................................................... 4,168 4,168 

NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN, TX ................................................... 2,382 2,382 

O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX ......................................................................................... 1,164 1,164

PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX .......................................................................................................... 1,208 1,208 

PROCTOR LAKE, TX ............................................................................................................. 2,324 2,324 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX ..................................................................................... 223 223 

RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX ...................................................................................................... 1,324 1,324 

SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX ......................................................................................... 13,399 13,399 

SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX .......................................................................... 6,247 6,247 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX ......................................................................... 149 149 
67 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX ......................................................................................................... 3,366 3,366 

STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX ............................................................................................ 2,096 2,096 

TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX .......................................................................................... 4,000 4,000 

TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX ..................................................................... 100 1,000 

TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX .................................................................. 2,505 2,505 

WACO LAKE, TX ................................................................................................................... 3,711 3,711 

WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX ......................................................................................................... 2,114 2,114 

WHITNEY LAKE, TX ............................................................................................................... 8,348 8,348 

WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX ................................................................................. 3,517 3,517 

UTAH 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT ............................................................................ 84 84 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT ........................................................................ 594 594 

VERMONT 

BALL MOUNTAIN, VT ............................................................................................................ 858 858 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT ............................................................................ 109 109 

NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY .......................................................................... 85 85 

NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT ................................................................................................ 772 772 

NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT ............................................................................................ 854 854 

TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT ......................................................................................................... 814 814 

UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT ..................................................................................................... 627 627 

VIRGINIA 

APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA ...................................................................................................... .......................... 500 

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY—ACC, VA ................................................................ 2,620 2,620 

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY—DSC, VA ................................................................ 991 1,311 

CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA ................................................................................................... 913 913 

GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA .......................................................................... 2,323 2,323 

HAMPTON RDS, NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS HARBOR, VA (DRIF ................................. 882 882 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA ............................................................................ 369 369 

JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA ................................................................................................ 4,479 4,479 

JOHN H. KERR LAKE, VA & NC ........................................................................................... 11,585 11,585 

JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA ................................................................ 2,104 2,104 

LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA ........................................................................................................ 277 277 

NORFOLK HARBOR, VA ........................................................................................................ 11,343 11,343 

NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA ........................................................................... 630 630 

PHILPOTT LAKE, VA & NC ................................................................................................... 5,638 5,638 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA ..................................................................................... 850 850 

REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, VA ................................................................................... 50 50 

RUDEE INLET, VA ................................................................................................................ 795 795 

WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA ...................................................................... 104 104 

WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA ...................................................................... 201 201 

WASHINGTON 

CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA ...................................................................................................... 790 790 

COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR ...................................................................... 86 727 

COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND SAND ISLAND, WA .......................................... 7 847 

EDIZ HOOK, WA ................................................................................................................... 730 730 

EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA ................................................................. 1,766 1,766 

FRIDAY HARBOR, WA ........................................................................................................... 111 111 

GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA ....................................................................... 11,140 11,140 

HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA ................................................................................................ 3,694 3,694 

ICE HARBOR LOCK & DAM, WA .......................................................................................... 5,828 5,828 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WA ........................................... 74 74 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA ........................................................................... 725 725 

LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA .................................................................................. 9,246 9,246 

LITTLE GOOSE LOCK & DAM, WA ........................................................................................ 2,551 2,551 

LOWER GRANITE LOCK & DAM, WA .................................................................................... 7,651 7,651 

LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK & DAM, WA ............................................................................ 2,735 6,735 

MILL CREEK LAKE, WA ........................................................................................................ 3,834 3,834 
68 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA ......................................................................... 279 279 

MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA ................................................................................................... 3,056 3,056 

NEAH BAY, WA ..................................................................................................................... 67 67 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA .................................................................................... 524 524 

PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA ..................................................................... 1,011 1,011 

QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA ....................................................................................................... 266 266 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA ........................................................................ 537 537 

SEATTLE HARBOR, WA ......................................................................................................... 172 172 

STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA ................................................................................................. 165 165

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA .................................................... 50 50 

TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA .......................................................................................... 130 130 

THE DALLES LOCK & DAM, WA & OR ................................................................................. 8,769 8,769 

WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA ...................................................................................... 40 40 

WEST VIRGINIA 

BEECH FORK LAKE, WV ....................................................................................................... 1,405 1,405 

BLUESTONE LAKE, WV ......................................................................................................... 1,661 1,661 

BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV ........................................................................................................ 2,246 2,246 

EAST LYNN LAKE, WV .......................................................................................................... 2,167 2,167 

ELKINS, WV .......................................................................................................................... 15 15 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV ........................................................................... 336 336 

KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS & DAM, WV .................................................................................. 14,089 14,089 

OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH ................................................................... 35,276 35,276 

OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & OH ............................................................ 2,996 2,996 

R D BAILEY LAKE, WV ......................................................................................................... 1,927 1,927 

STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV ......................................................................................... 1,148 1,148 

SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV ................................................................................................... 3,234 3,234 

SUTTON LAKE, WV ............................................................................................................... 2,413 2,413 

TYGART LAKE, WV ................................................................................................................ 1,478 1,478 

WISCONSIN 

EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI ................................................................................................ 888 888

FOX RIVER, WI ..................................................................................................................... 2,421 4,421 

GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI .................................................................................................... 3,459 6,459 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI ............................................................................ 91 91 

KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI ...................................................................................................... 40 40 

PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI ..................................................................................... 283 283 

STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI ....................................... 20 20 

SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WI ..................................................... 388 388 

WYOMING 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WV ........................................... 10 10 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY ........................................................................... 25 25 

JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY ................................................................................................ 877 877 

SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY ........................................................................ 118 118 

SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED BY STATE ............................................................... 2,317,027 2,366,322 

REMAINING ITEMS: 

ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................... 8,000 5,000 

AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH ................................................................. 690 690 

ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ............................ 4,750 4,750 

BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M BUSINESS LINES .................................. 6,792 6,792 

COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM ....................................................................... 3,000 3,000 

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT REQUIRING SPECIFIC .............................. .......................... ..........................

BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204/145) ............................... 9,175 ..........................

NATIONAL MITIGATION PROJECTS (SECTION 111) ...................................................... .......................... 9,043

RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS PROJECTS ............................................ 5,000 2,500 

CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION) ............................................................ 2,500 2,500 

DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE ..................................................................... 12,000 12,000 

DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE ......................................................................... 12,000 12,000 

DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM .......................... 1,150 1,150 
69 

CORPS OF ENGINEERS—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (DOE ......................... 7,000 7,000 

DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM [DOTS] ............................. 2,000 2,000 

EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM ......................................................... 270 270 

FACILITY PROTECTION ................................................................................................ 7,000 7,000 

FERC HYDROPOWER COORDINATION .......................................................................... 3,000 3,000 

FISH AND WILDLIFEOPERATING FISH HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT ........................... 4,700 4,700 

GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL ........................................................... 1,200 1,200 

INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS .................................................................. 3,800 3,800 

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS ......................................................................... 1,780 1,780 

LONG-TERM OPTION ASSESSMENTFOR LOW USE NAVIGATION .................................. 1,500 1,500 

MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTS ............................................... 1,800 1,800 

NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM ................................................................... 7,000 12,000 

NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM ............................................................................. 18,000 18,000 

NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM [NEPP] ...................................... 7,000 7,000 

NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY ....................................................................... 10,000 10,000 

NATIONAL (MULTI PROJECT) NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ........................... 4,230 4,230 

NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REALLOCATION .......................................... 571 571 

NATIONWIDE EVALUATION OF HYDROPOWER REHAB ................................................. 2,000 2,000 

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT [ABS–P2,WINABS] .......................... 300 300 

PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: 

REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS ................................................................................. 500 500 

PROTECT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN CHANNELS (SEC 3) ........................................... 50 50 

WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS ...................................................................... 4,771 4,771 

HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION ........................................................ 825 825 

RECREATION ONE STOP [R1S] NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVAT ........................... 65 65 

REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM ............................. 2,000 5,000 

HAWAII RSM, HI ................................................................................................. .......................... (500 ) 

SOUTHEAST OAHU REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, HI ............................. .......................... (500 ) 

NORTH CAROLINA RSM, NJ ............................................................................... .......................... (600 ) 

DELAWARE ESTUARY RSM, NJ ........................................................................... .......................... (200 ) 

SOUTH COASTAL RHODE ISLAND REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT ............ .......................... (750 ) 

CHESAPEAKE BAY, NEWPOINT COMFORT, MATHEWS COUNTY, ......................... .......................... (350 ) 

RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR REHAB ................................................ 608 608 

RESERVE FOR KEY EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIRS ......................................... 20,000 ..........................

SHORELINE USE PERMIT STUDY ................................................................................ 250 250 

WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT [WOTS] ................................................... 653 653 

SUBTOTAL, FOR ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES ............................................. 186,973 151,255 

REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE .......................................................................... .......................... ¥67,577 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ................................................................. 2,504,000 2,450,000 

Kodiak Harbor, Alaska.—The Committee recommendation includes $240,000 to secure environmental clearances and prepare 

contract documents for St. Herman’s Harbor and St. Paul Harbor. 

Petersberg Harbor, Alaska.—$500,000 is recommended to obtain 

environmental clearances and prepare contract plans and specifications. 

Arkansas Lakes, Arkansas.—The Committee recommendation includes an increase of $500,000 each for DeGray Lake, Lake 

Greeson and Lake Ouachita, to provide adequate levels of service 

and for backlog maintenance items. 

Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.—The Committee recommends 

$800,000 for maintenance dredging of this harbor. 

Marina Del Rey, California.—The Committee recommends 

$3,000,000 for dredging this project, the largest man-made harbor 

in the United States with nearly 6,000 boat slips and home to a 

U.S. Coast Guard Cutter. 
70 

Norwalk Harbor, CT.—The Committee recommends $1,000,000 

for the Phase III maintenance dredging of the harbor. 

Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes Beach, Delaware.—The Committee has included funding for this project in the 

construction account. 

Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, Delaware.—The Committee recommends $200,000 to update existing preliminary design and condition survey. 

Wilmington Harbor, Delaware.—The Committee recommendation 

includes $2,320,000 for this project. Additional funds recommended 

above the budget request are for maintenance of disposal areas and 

additional dredging. 

Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee to Anclote, Florida.—The 

Committee recommends $2,000,000 for maintenance dredging. 

Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.—The Committee recommendation 

includes $6,035,000 for routine maintenance and $1,000,000 is included in the CG account for Dredged Material Disposal Facilities 

[DMDF]. 

Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Georgia.—$1,000,000 is recommended for dredging critical areas of this waterway as well as 

for work related to new upland disposal sites. 

Savannah Harbor, Georgia.—The Committee recommendation for 

Savannah Harbor includes $14,187,000 for routine maintenance 

and $900,000 is included in the CG account for Dredged material 

Disposal Facilities [DMDF]. 

Chicago Harbor, Illinois.—The Committee is aware of the city of 

Chicago’s interest in modifying the existing Chicago Lakefront 

Inner Breakwater consistent with the city of Chicago’s 2016 Olympic Master Plan for Chicago Harbor. The Committee encourages 

the Chicago District of the Army Corps of Engineers to continue to 

work with the city of Chicago on the city’s proposal. 

Illinois River Waterway, Illinois and Indiana (MVR Portion).— The Committee has recommended $900,000 above the budget request for small boat harbor dredging in western Illinois. 

Calumet Harbor and River, Illinois.—The Committee recommendation includes $3,120,000 for routine maintenance and 

$1,501,000 is included in the CG account for DMDF. 

Indiana Harbor Confined Disposal Facility, Indiana.—Funds for 

this project have been included in the CG account. 

Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.—The Committee has included additional funds for dredging needs on this project. 

J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Louisiana.—The Committee has 

included additional funds above the budget request for backlog 

maintenance and dredging needs. 

Assateague, Maryland.—The Committee has included funding for 

this project in the construction account. 

Poplar Island, Maryland.—The Committee has included funding 

for this project in the construction account. 

Somerset County Channels, Maryland.—The Committee recommendation includes $1,000,000 for additional dredging needs at 

these harbors that service watermen and the Maryland seafood industry. 

Michigan Harbor Dredging, Michigan.—The Committee notes 

that there are some 50 Federally maintained harbors and water-
71 

ways in Michigan. However, the Committee also notes that fewer 

than 20 are budgeted. With the limited funding available to the 

Committee, the Committee has recommended $7,000,000 under 

this line item to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State 

rather than trying to fund small amounts for each project. The 

Committee has listed all of the harbors and waterways in the table 

that are eligible for this funding. However, recognizing that conditions on these small waterways is constantly changing and the 

Great Lakes are suffering from near historic low water levels, the 

Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program 

for fiscal year 2010 that would most effectively utilize the scarce 

funds available for these harbor and waterway projects. 

Mouth of the Yazoo River, Mississippi.—The Committee includes 

additional funds for the maintenance dredging of the entrance to 

the Vicksburg Harbor. 

Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.—The Committee has recommended $10,900,000 for this project. Additional funds above the 

budget request are recommended to perform additional dredging 

and maintenance of the entrance and main channels. 

Rosedale Harbor, Mississippi.—The Committee recommendation 

includes $600,000 for maintenance dredging of the harbor. 

Absecon Inlet, New Jersey.—The Committee recommends 

$250,000 for dredging of the inlet. 

Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, New Jersey.—The Committee 

has included funding for this project in the construction account. 

Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.—The 

Committee has included funding for this project in the construction 

account. 

Ogdensburg Harbor, New York.—The Committee recommends 

$70,000 to provide for Sediment Sampling and Analysis in order to 

perform a tiered evaluation and characterize the channel material 

for dredging and establish appropriate disposal methods for the 

dredged material. 

Oswego Harbor, New York.—The Committee recommends 

$300,000 to perform Engineering and Design for the East and West 

Arrowhead Breakwater Repair. 

Coastal Inlets, North Carolina.—The Committee has included additional funds for the coastal inlets on the North Carolina coast 

that were not funded in the administration’s budget request. With 

the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has 

attempted to provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. 

However, recognizing that conditions on these inlets are constantly 

changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2010 that would most effectively utilize 

the scarce funds available for these inlets. 

Garrison Dam and Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.—The Committee recommends $100,000 for mosquito control in the Williston 

area due to the shallow-water mosquito breeding areas created by 

the impoundment of Lake Sakakawea. 

Ohio Great Lakes Harbor.—The Committee has included additional funds for a number of the Great Lakes Harbors in Ohio that 

were underfunded in the administration’s budget request. With the 

limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging need of the State. 
72 

However, recognizing that conditions on these inlets are constantly 

changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2010 that would most effectively utilize 

the scarce funds available for these harbors. 

Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oregon.—The Committee 

recommends $918,000 for this project. Funds above the budget request are for minimal seasonal lock operation for commercial and 

recreational users and to prepare a design report for comprehensive rehab of lock facility. 

Block Island, Harbor of Refuge, Rhode Island.—The Committee 

has recommended $1,250,000 to advertise and award a fully funded 

contract to repair the east bulkhead. 

Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.—The Committee recommendation includes $10,694,000 for routine maintenance and 

$1,798,000 is included in the CG account for DMDF. 

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, South Dakota.— The Committee notes that title VI of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, as amended, requires that funding to inventory 

and stabilize cultural and historic sites along the Missouri River in 

South Dakota, and to carry out the terrestrial wildlife habitat programs, shall be provided from the O&M account. The Committee 

provides $3,000,000 to protect cultural resource sites and provide 

funding to the State and tribes for approved restoration and stewardship plans and in compliance with the requirements of title VI, 

directs the Corps to contract with or reimburse the State of South 

Dakota and affected tribes to carry out these duties. 

Texas Water Allocation Assessment, Texas.—$1,000 is recommended to continue these studies to determine if existing water 

can be better allocated to support more balanced water use in light 

of future needs. 

Appomattox River, VA.—The committee recommends $500,000 to 

complete environmental testing and analysis and obtain environmental permits. 

Chinook, Head of Sand Island, and Baker Bay, Washington.— 

The Committee notes the proximity of Corps navigation facilities 

on the Columbia River between Chinook and the Head of Sand Island, Washington, and at Baker Bay, Washington, and encourage 

the Corps of Engineers to seek ways to achieve cost savings and 

efficiency, such as by utilizing appropriate contracting methods 

while having these two projects be considered together when seeking bids and awarding contracts. $1,574,000 is recommended for 

dredging at these harbors. 

Mud Mountain Dam, Washington.—Within the funds recommended, the Corps is directed to continue to satisfy Federal fish 

passage obligations for the term of the cooperative agreement with 

Puget Sound Energy. 

Fox River, Wisconsin.—Additional funds recommended above the 

budget request are to reimburse Wisconsin, in accordance with the 

agreement, for the costs of repairs and rehabilitation of the transferred locks and for the Corps of Engineers to undertake major repairs for the dams and associated infrastructure. 

Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin.—The Committee recommendation 

includes $3,000,000 above the budget request for backlog maintenance and dredging needs. 
73 

Continuing Authorities Projects for Section 111 and Section 

204.—These sections of the CAP are funded in the CG account with 

the other parts of the CAP. 

Response to Climate Change at Corps Projects.—A portion of 

these funds were moved to the Coastal Data Information Program 

in order to ensure that the period of record for coastal wave information is maintained. 

National Coastal Mapping.—$12,000,000 is recommended for 

this program. Additional funds recommended above the budget request are for LIDAR bathymetry for use in regional sediment management and for Coastal Zone Mapping and Imaging LIDAR/ 

LASER to be conducted with the University of Southern Mississippi. 

Regional Sediment Management Demonstration Program.—The 

Committee has recommended $5,000,000 for this program, 

$3,000,000 above the budget request. Within the funds recommended, the Corps is directed to undertake studies for the State 

of Hawaii; the Southeast Coast of Oahu, Hawaii; the State of North 

Carolina; South Coastal Rhode Island; Delaware Estuary, New Jersey; and for Chesapeake Bay, New Point Comfort, Mathews County, Virginia. 

Reserve for Key Emergency Maintenance/Repairs.—The Committee has recommended no funding for this item. The Committee 

believes it is critical for Corps Headquarters to retain a maintenance reserve. Therefore, a proviso in the operation and maintenance section of the bill is included to address this need. 

FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ( 1 ) 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 41,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ........................... 

1 Excludes emergency appropriations of $3,680,290,000. 

The Committee has recommended no funding for the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account. Readiness and preparedness 

activities have been funded through supplemental appropriations 

acts. This account provides funds for preparedness activities for 

natural and other disasters, response, and emergency flood fighting 

and rescue operations, hurricane response, and emergency shore 

protection work. It also provides for emergency supplies of clean 

water where the source has been contaminated or where adequate 

supplies of water are needed for consumption. 

REGULATORY PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $183,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 190,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 190,000,000 

1 Excludes emergency appropriations of $25,000,000. 

An appropriation of $190,000,000 is recommended for the regulatory program of the Corps of Engineers. 

This appropriation provides for salaries and costs incurred administering regulation of activities affecting U.S. waters, including 

wetlands, in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 

33 U.S.C. section 401, the Clean Water Act of 1977 Public Law 95– 
74 

217, and the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 

1972 Public Law 92–532. 

The appropriation helps maintain program performance, protects 

important aquatic resources, and supports partnerships with States 

and local communities through watershed planning efforts. 

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $140,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 134,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 140,000,000 

1 Excludes emergency appropriations of $100,000,000. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $140,000,000 to 

continue activities related to the FUSRAP in fiscal year 2005. 

The responsibility for the cleanup of contaminated sites under 

the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program was transferred to the Army Corps of Engineers in the fiscal year 1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 105– 

62. 

FUSRAP is not specifically defined by statute. The program was 

established in 1974 under the broad authority of the Atomic Energy Act and, until fiscal year 1998, funds for the cleanup of contaminated defense sites had been appropriated to the Department 

of Energy through existing appropriation accounts. In appropriating FUSRAP funds to the Corps of Engineers, the Committee 

intended to transfer only the responsibility for administration and 

execution of cleanup activities at eligible sites where remediation 

had not been completed. It did not intend to transfer ownership of 

and accountability for real property interests that remain with the 

Department of Energy. 

The Corps of Engineers has extensive experience in the cleanup 

of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive wastes through its work for the 

Department of Defense and other Federal agencies. The Committee 

always intended for the Corps’ expertise be used in the same manner for the cleanup of contaminated sites under FUSRAP. The 

Committee expects the Corps to continue programming and budgeting for FUSRAP as part of the Corps of Engineers—Civil program. The Committee directs the Corps to prioritize sites that are 

nearing completion during fiscal year 2008. 

The Corps is directed to prioritize sites that are nearing completion. The Committee directs the Corps of Engineers during fiscal 

year 2010 to complete the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study 

of the former Sylvania nuclear fuel site at Hicksville, New York 

and to proceed expeditiously to a Record of Decision and, if appropriate, initiate any necessary remediation in accordance with 

CERCLA. The Secretary of the Army shall submit a report to the 

Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and 

the Senate detailing the progress not later than 120 days after enactment of this act. 

GENERAL EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $179,365,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 184,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 186,000,000 
75 

This appropriation finances the expenses of the Office, Chief of 

Engineers, the Division Offices, and certain research and statistical 

functions of the Corps of Engineers. The Committee recommendation is $186,000,000. 

Executive Direction and Management.—The Office of the Chief of 

Engineers and 8 division offices supervise work in 38 district offices. 

Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity.—This support center provides administrative services (such as personnel, logistics, 

information management, and finance and accounting) for the Office of the Chief of Engineers and other separate field operating activities. 

Institute for Water Resources.—This institute performs studies, 

analyses, and develops planning techniques for the management 

and development of the Nation’s water resources. 

United States Army Corps of Engineers Finance Center.—This 

center provides centralized support for all Corps finance and accounting. 

Office of Congressional Affairs.—The Committee has included 

statutory language for the past several years prohibiting any funds 

from being used to fund an Office of Congressional Affairs within 

the executive office of the Chief of Engineers. The Committee believes that an Office of Congressional Affairs for the Civil Works 

Program would hamper the efficient and effective coordination of 

issues with the Committee staff and Members of Congress. The 

Committee believes that the technical knowledge and managerial 

expertise needed for the Corps headquarters to effectively address 

Civil Works authorization, appropriation, and headquarters policy 

matters resides in the Civil Works organization. Therefore, the 

Committee strongly recommends that the Office of Congressional 

Affairs not be a part of the process by which information on Civil 

Works projects, programs, and activities is provided to Congress. 

In 1998, The Chief of Engineers issued a Command Directive 

transferring the oversight and management of the General Expenses account, as well as the manpower associated with this function, from the Civil Works Directorate to the Resource Management Office. The Corps is reminded that General Expense funds 

are appropriated solely for the executive management and oversight of the Civil Works Program under the direction of the Director of Civil Works. 

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS)

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $4,500,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 6,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 5,000,000 

The Committee has recommended $5,000,000 for the Office of the 

Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) [OASA(CW)]. As has 

been previously stated, the Committee believes that this office 

should be funded through the Defense appropriations bill and directs the administration to budget for this office under the Department of Defense, Operation and Maintenance—Army account in future budget submissions. It is the Committee’s opinion that the traditional role of the ASA(CW) is to provide the Chief of Engineers 

advice about policy matters and generally be the political spokes-
76 

person for the administration’s policies; however, the Chief of Engineers is responsible for carrying out the program. This is underscored by the administration’s budget documents that state that 

the OASA(CW) provides policy direction and oversight for the civil 

works program and the Headquarters of the Corps provides executive direction and management of the civil works program. 

The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works advises the 

Secretary of the Army on a variety of matters, including the Civil 

Works program of the Corps of Engineers. The Assistant Secretary 

is a member of the Army Secretariat with responsibilities, such as 

participating in Continuity of Government exercises that extend 

well beyond Civil Works. The Assistant Secretary also oversees the 

administration, operation and maintenance, and capital development of Arlington National Cemetery and the Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery. Congressional oversight of the 

Army Cemetery program lies not with the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, but rather with the Appropriations 

Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and 

with the Committee on Veterans Affairs. 

The Army’s accounting system does not track OMA funding of 

overhead or Army-wide support offices on the basis of which office 

receives support, nor would it be efficient or effective to do so for 

a 20-person office. Instead, expenses such as legal support, personnel services, finance and accounting services, the executive 

motor pool, travel on military aircraft, and other support services 

are centrally funded and managed on a department-wide basis. 

Transferring the funding for the expenses of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works to a separate account has greatly complicated the Army’s accounting for such indirect and overhead expenses with no commensurate benefit to justify the change. The 

Committee does not agree that these costs should be funded in this 

bill and therefore has only provided funding for salaries and expenses as in previous years. 

GENERAL PROVISIONS—CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL

Section 101. The bill includes language concerning reprogramming guidelines. 

Section 102. The bill includes language prohibiting implementation of competitive sourcing or HPO. 

Section 103. The bill includes language concerning report notifications. 

Section 104. The bill includes language concerning reallocations 

in Lake Cumberland, Kentucky. 

Section 105. The bill includes language concerning continuing 

contracts and the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. 

Section 106. The bill contains language concerning a project cost 

limit change. 

Section 107. The bill contains language concerning a project cost 

limit change. 

Section 108. The bill contains language concerning a project cost 

limit change. 

Section 109. The bill contains language concerning a project cost 

limit change. 
77 

Section 110 The bill contains language concerning a project cost 

limit change. 

Section 111. The bill contains language concerning a reimbursement limit change. 

Section 112. The bill contains language regarding Alaska coastal 

erosion. 

Section 113. The bill contains language making a correction to a 

provision in WRDA 2007. 

Section 114. The bill contains language concerning a project cost 

limit change. 

Section 115. The bill contains language concerning a rescission of 

MR&T funds. 

Section 116. The bill contains language concerning a rescission of 

CG funds. 
(78) 

TITLE II 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT COMPLETION ACCOUNT

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $42,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 42,004,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 42,004,000 

The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2010 to carry out 

the provisions of the Central Utah Project Completion Act totals 

$42,004,000. An appropriation of $38,800,000 has been provided for 

Central Utah project construction; $1,500,000 for fish, wildlife, and 

recreation, mitigation and conservation. The Committee recommendation provides $1,704,000 for program administration and 

oversight. 

Legislative language is included which allows up to $1,500,000 of 

the funds provided to be used for administrative costs. 

The Central Utah Project Completion Act (titles II–VI of Public 

Law 102–575) provides for the completion of the central Utah 

project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District. The Act 

also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish, wildlife, recreation, mitigation, and conservation; establishes an account in the 

Treasury for the deposit of these funds and of other contributions 

for mitigation and conservation activities; and establishes a Utah 

Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission to administer funds in that account. The act further assigns responsibilities 

for carrying out the act to the Secretary of the Interior and prohibits delegation of those responsibilities to the Bureau of Reclamation. 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $920,259,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 893,125,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 993,125,000 

1 Excludes emergency appropriations of $1,000,000,000. 

An appropriation of $993,125,000 is recommended by the Committee for general investigations of the Bureau of Reclamation. The 

water and related resources account supports the development, 

management, and restoration of water and related natural resources in the 17 Western States. The account includes funds for 

operating and maintaining existing facilities to obtain the greatest 

overall level of benefits, to protect public safety, and to conduct 

studies on ways to improve the use of water and related natural 

resources. Work will be done in partnership and cooperation with 

non-Federal entities and other Federal agencies. 
79 

The Committee has divided underfinancing between the Resources Management Subaccount and the Facilities Operation and 

Maintenance subaccount. The Committee directs that the underfinancing amount in each subaccount initially be applied uniformly 

across all projects within the subaccounts. Upon applying the 

underfinanced amounts, normal reprogramming procedures should 

be undertaken to account for schedule slippages, accelerations, or 

other unforeseen conditions. 

DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS

The Committee received more than 140 requests for projects, programs, studies or activities for the Bureau of Reclamation for fiscal 

year 2010. These requests included the budget request as well as 

requests by Members. The Committee obviously was unable to accommodate all of these requests. 

In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding provided in 

the Energy and Water bill, all disclosures are made in the report 

accompanying the bill. 

All of the projects funded in this report have gone through the 

same rigorous public review and approval process as those proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these projects, 

of course, is that the congressionally directed projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to decide what not to fund. 

There are two disclosure tables this year. One discloses the recommended amounts that are in excess of those proposed in the 

budget request and the Members names that made these requests. 

If the Member requested the budget request or if only the budget 

request was provided, Member names are not listed next to these 

items because under the provisions of Rule 44 this would not be 

considered congressionally directed spending. The second table discloses only those earmarks requested by the President and the 

amounts recommended or the budget request whichever is appropriated. 

The purposes for the funding provided in the various accounts is 

described in the paragraphs associated with each account. The location of the programs, projects or studies are denoted in the account 

tables. 

The amounts recommended by the Committee are shown on the 

following table along with the budget request. 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION—WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

ARIZONA 

AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT ......................... .................... 10,600 .................. 10,600 

ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT ........................................ 1,400 .................. 1,400 ..................

COLORADO RIVER BASIN, CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT ..................... 18,103 305 18,103 305 

COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM ........................ 2,350 .................. 2,350 ..................

NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ............................... 350 .................. 350 ..................

PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT ............................. 200 .................. 200 ..................

SALT RIVER PROJECT .......................................................................... 517 133 517 133 
80 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION—WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT ..................... 325 .................. 325 ..................

SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ...................... 1,000 .................. 1,000 ..................

SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT ...... 1,703 .................. 1,703 ..................

YUMA AREA PROJECTS ........................................................................ 1,327 23,173 1,327 23,173 

LOAN FOR WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE, AZ ............................... .................... .................. 3,209 ..................

CALIFORNIA 

CACHUMA PROJECT ............................................................................. 837 837 837 837 

CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ............................................. 500 .................. 500 ..................

CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT ............ 1,400 .................. 1,400 ..................

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS: 

AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION ........................................................ 1,681 7,895 1,681 7,895 

AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT .................................................. 1,663 .................. 1,663 ..................

DELTA DIVISION .......................................................................... 15,063 5,342 15,063 5,342 

EAST SIDE DIVISION ................................................................... 1,676 2,750 1,676 2,750 

FRIANT DIVISION ........................................................................ 2,054 3,702 2,554 3,702 

MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS ...................................... 10,838 958 10,838 958 

REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT ...... .................... 25,000 .................. 25,000 

SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION ................................................... 15,517 1,379 15,517 1,379 

SAN FELIPE DIVISION ................................................................. 1,635 16 1,635 16 

SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION .............................................................. 356 .................. 7,356 ..................

SHASTA DIVISION ....................................................................... 178 7,876 178 7,876 

TRINITY RIVER DIVISION ............................................................ 7,310 3,185 7,310 3,185 

WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS .............................................. 993 8,287 993 8,287 

WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT .......................... 3,047 5,478 3,047 5,478 

YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION ............................................. 450 .................. 450 ..................

INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT .................. .................... .................. 100 ..................

IRVINE BASIN GROUND & SURFACE WATER ....................................... .................... .................. 100 ..................

LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS ..................................................... 102 .................. 2,602 ..................

LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT ...... 1,400 .................. 1,400 ..................

LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ............ 700 .................. 700 ..................

MOKELUMNE RIVER REGIONAL WATER STORAGE & CONJUNCTIVE 

U ..................................................................................................... .................... .................. 500 ..................

ORLAND PROJECT ................................................................................ .................... 703 .................. 703 

SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT ...................................................... 400 .................. 400 ..................

SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION PROGRAM ........................... 3,500 .................. 3,500 ..................

SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT ............................................................ 1,400 .................. 1,400 ..................

SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM ......... 208 .................. 208 ..................

SOBABO WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT PROJECT ................................. 5,000 .................. 10,000 ..................

SOLANO PROJECT ................................................................................ 1,612 2,497 1,612 2,497 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .......................... 520 .................. 520 ..................

VENTURA RIVER PROJECT ................................................................... 397 195 397 195 

COLORADO 

ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT ................................................................ 53,743 445 53,743 445 

COLLBRAN PROJECT ............................................................................ 190 3,695 190 3,695 

COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT ................................................. 405 13,395 405 13,395 

COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .............................................. 300 .................. 300 ..................

FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT ........................................................... 99 160 99 160 

FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT ......................................................... 252 8,398 252 8,398 

GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II ............................................. 170 1,307 170 1,307 

LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY ............................................ 30 2,935 30 2,935 

LOWER COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .................................. 250 .................. 250 ..................

MANCOS PROJECT ............................................................................... 71 107 71 107 

PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II ......................................... 64 2,282 64 2,282 

PINE RIVER PROJECT .......................................................................... 189 157 189 157 

SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT ................................................................. 244 4,636 244 4,636 

UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT .................................................................... 228 140 228 140 

UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM ............................. 250 .................. 250 ..................
81 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION—WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

IDAHO 

BOISE AREA PROJECTS ....................................................................... 3,086 2,315 3,086 2,315 

COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT FCRPS 18,000 .................. 18,000 ..................

IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ...................................................... 300 .................. 300 ..................

LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS ........................................................ 1,234 30 1,234 30 

MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS ................................................................. 2,736 4,432 2,736 4,432 

KANSAS 

KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ................................................... 25 .................. 25 ..................

WICHITA PROJECT—CHENEY DIVISION ............................................... 10 395 10 395 

WICHITA PROJECT—EQUUS BEDS DIVISION ....................................... 50 .................. 2,050 ..................

MONTANA 

FORT PECK DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM .............................. 4,000 .................. 14,000 ..................

HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT ................................................................... .................... 1,865 .................. 1,865 

HUNTLEY PROJECT .............................................................................. 31 56 31 56 

LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT ......................................................... 532 15 532 15 

MILK RIVER PROJECT .......................................................................... 314 1,486 314 1,486 

MILK RIVER/ST. MARY DIVERSION REHABILITATION PROJECT ............ 2,500 .................. 4,000 ..................

MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS ................................................................. 140 .................. 140 ..................

ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM .... 1,000 .................. 16,000 ..................

SUN RIVER PROJECT ........................................................................... 50 328 50 328 

NEBRASKA 

MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT ..................................................................... 16 119 16 119 

NEVADA 

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS [NORTH LAS VEGAS, WATER REUSE] ..... .................... .................. 2,000 ..................

HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY ........................................................ 125 .................. 125 ..................

LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT ................................................................. 4,745 2,531 4,745 2,531 

LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM ........................................... 800 .................. 2,000 ..................

NEW MEXICO 

ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER & RECLAMATION REUSE .......... .................... .................. 500 ..................

CARLSBAD PROJECT ............................................................................ 2,615 1,104 2,615 1,104 

CHIMAYO, NM ...................................................................................... .................... .................. 500 ..................

EASTERN NEW MEXICO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ........................... 50 .................. 50 ..................

EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY ................................. .................... .................. 500 ..................

JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM ................. 1,000 .................. 5,000 ..................

MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT ........................................................... 14,801 8,949 14,961 8,949 

NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY ......................................................... .................... .................. 7,791 ..................

NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ....................................... 200 .................. 200 ..................

PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT ................................ .................... 209 .................. 209 

RIO GRANDE PROJECT ........................................................................ 824 4,175 824 4,175 

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .......................... 150 .................. 150 ..................

SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INV. PROGRAM ...................... 150 .................. 150 ..................

TUCUMCARI PROJECT .......................................................................... 24 17 24 17 

UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS ...................................... 75 .................. 75 ..................

NORTH DAKOTA 

PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN—GARRISON DIVERSION ..................... 30,654 5,639 64,361 5,639 

OKLAHOMA 

ARBUCKLE PROJECT ............................................................................ 48 186 48 186 

MCGEE CREEK PROJECT ..................................................................... 20 644 20 644 

MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT .................................................................. 7 518 7 518 

NORMAN PROJECT ............................................................................... 25 452 25 452 

OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .............................................. 150 .................. 150 ..................

WASHITA BASIN PROJECT .................................................................... 7 1,048 7 1,048 
82 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION—WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT ......................................................................... 23 435 23 435 

OREGON 

CROOKED RIVER PROJECT .................................................................. 412 427 412 427 

DESCHUTES PROJECT .......................................................................... 300 182 800 182 

EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS ............................................................. 573 272 573 272 

KLAMATH PROJECT .............................................................................. 20,589 4,411 20,589 4,411 

KLAMATH DAM REMOVAL STUDY ........................................................ 2,000 .................. 2,000 ..................

OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .................................................. 300 .................. 450 ..................

ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION .............................. 814 331 1,014 331 

SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL ......................................................... 1,160 .................. 1,160 ..................

TUALATIN PROJECT .............................................................................. 68 271 68 271 

TUALATIN VALLEY WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY .................................. .................... .................. 300 ..................

UMATILLA PROJECT ............................................................................. 958 3,352 958 3,352 

SOUTH DAKOTA 

LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM ........................................ 2,000 .................. 16,000 ..................

MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT ................................................ .................... 15 .................. 15 

MNI WICONI PROJECT ......................................................................... 17,280 10,200 27,280 10,200 

PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM .......................................... 1,000 .................. 2,000 ..................

RAPID VALLEY PROJECT ...................................................................... .................... 79 .................. 79 

TEXAS 

BALMORHEA PROJECT ......................................................................... 41 17 41 17 

CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT ................................................................. 54 163 54 163 

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION 

P ..................................................................................................... 50 .................. 2,550 ..................

NUECES RIVER PROJECT ..................................................................... 20 721 20 721 

SAN ANGELO PROJECT ........................................................................ 35 401 35 401 

TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ...................................................... 45 .................. 45 ..................

UTAH 

HYRUM PROJECT ................................................................................. 152 46 152 46 

MOON LAKE PROJECT .......................................................................... 4 76 4 76 

NEWTON PROJECT ............................................................................... 59 39 59 39 

NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .................................... 200 .................. 700 ..................

OGDEN RIVER PROJECT ...................................................................... 213 177 213 177 

PROVO RIVER PROJECT ....................................................................... 1,002 433 1,002 433 

SCOFIELD PROJECT ............................................................................. 107 80 107 80 

SOUTHERN NEVADA/UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ....................... 25 .................. 25 ..................

SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ..................................... 225 .................. 225 ..................

STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT .......................................................... 248 21 248 21 

WEBER BASIN PROJECT ...................................................................... 747 745 1,747 745 

WEBER RIVER PROJECT ...................................................................... 50 109 50 109 

WASHINGTON 

COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT ................................................................. 5,692 10,762 5,692 10,762 

ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY ..................................................... .................... .................. 3,000 ..................

WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS ............................................................ 193 15 193 15 

WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ........................................... 150 .................. 150 ..................

YAKIMA PROJECT ................................................................................. 2,420 6,092 2,420 6,092 

YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT ..................... 8,500 .................. 10,000 ..................

WYOMING 

KENDRICK PROJECT ............................................................................ 119 3,139 119 3,139 

NORTH PLATTE PROJECT ..................................................................... 266 1,351 266 1,351 

SHOSHONE PROJECT ........................................................................... 76 1,080 76 1,080 

SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS ..................................................... 322,861 229,923 455,528 229,923 
83 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION—WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Project title 

Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

Resources 

management 

Facilities 

OM&R 

REGIONAL PROGRAMS 

COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE I ...... .................... 11,450 .................. 11,450 

COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE I ...... 6,970 .................. 6,970 ..................

COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, [CRSP], SECTION 5 .............................. 3,449 4,888 3,449 4,888 

COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, [CRSP], SECTION 8 .............................. 2,710 .................. 2,710 ..................

COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ........... 233 .................. 233 ..................

DAM SAFETY PROGRAM: 

DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM ....................................... .................... 2,029 .................. 2,029 

INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION ........................................... .................... 81,600 .................. 81,600 

SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS ............................. .................... 18,250 .................. 18,250 

DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ................................. 488 .................. 488 ..................

EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM .............. .................... 1,432 .................. 1,432 

ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM ....... 19,012 .................. 19,012 ..................

ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES .......... 2,187 .................. 2,187 ..................

ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION .................................... 947 .................. 947 ..................

EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES ........................................... .................... 7,675 .................. 7,675 

FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM ................................ .................... 1,400 .................. 1,400 

GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES ............................................................. 2,213 .................. 2,213 ..................

LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ...................................... 8,682 .................. 8,682 ..................

LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM ............................ 21,448 .................. 22,128 ..................

MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS ................................ .................... 777 .................. 777 

NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM ............................................... 6,197 .................. 6,197 ..................

NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING ................. 1,563 .................. 1,563 ..................

OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ....................................... 1,026 625 1,026 625 

PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN—OTHER PICK SLOAN ......................... 3,321 36,205 3,321 36,205 

POWER PROGRAM SERVICES .............................................................. 724 307 724 307 

PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM ............................................ 598 155 598 155 

RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION ................................................. 2,199 .................. 2,199 ..................

RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION .......... 1,625 .................. 1,625 ..................

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: 

DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM ............... 2,133 1,600 2,133 1,600 

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ..................................... 9,200 .................. 10,200 ..................

RURAL WATER LEGISLATION, TITLE I .................................................. 2,348 .................. 2,348 ..................

SITE SECURITY .................................................................................... .................... 28,877 .................. 28,877 

TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM .................... .................... .................. 2,500 ..................

UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES—TECHNICAL SUPPORT .... 96 .................. 96 ..................

WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM ........................... 6,510 .................. 6,510 ..................

WATER CONSERVATION INITIATIVE ...................................................... 37,192 .................. 22,192 ..................

SUBTOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES ..................... 465,932 427,193 587,779 427,193 

UNDERFINANCING ................................................................................ .................... .................. ¥18,404 ¥3,193 

TOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES ........................... 893,125 .................. 993,125 ..................

White Mountain Apache Tribe, Arizona.—The Committee recommends $3,209,000 to be provided as the subsidy for a loan to the 

White Mountain Apache Tribe for a drinking water project. 

Central Valley Project—Friant Division, California.—The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for the Semi Tropic 

Phase II groundwater banking. 

Central Valley Project—San Joaquin Division.—The Committee 

recommendation includes $7,000,000 for the San Joaquin River 

Restoration. These funds should be utilized in conjunction with and 

in advance of those funds available from the San Joaquin River 

Restoration Fund. 
84 

Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project.—The Committee recognizes that the authorizing statute (Public Law 104–266 

as amended by Public Law 111–11) authorizes a cap of $20,000,000 

in 1996 prices, which could escalate to as much as $26,000,000 in 

2010 prices for the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation 

Project. Accordingly, this project has not yet reached its authorization ceiling and is eligible for additional funding. Other projects 

may be similarly situated. The Committee encourages Reclamation 

to allocate surplus funds that may become available from the 

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to this project and any 

other similarly situated project. The Committee expects the Bureau 

to provide accurate capability statements for all Title XVI projects 

that reflect the escalator clause. Capability statements should not 

contain restrictions and limitations that are based purely on internal Bureau policies, but rather should reflect the true maximum 

capacity of the Bureau under the governing statutes. 

Lake Tahoe Regional Wetlands, California and Nevada.—The 

Committee recommendation includes $2,602,000. Within the funds 

provided, $2,000,000 is recommended for the Rosewood Creek, Area 

A project in Nevada. 

Sobabo Water Rights Settlement Project, California.—The Committee recommends an additional $5,000,000 above the budget request for this water rights settlement. 

Wichita Project—Equus Beds Division, Kansas.—The Committee 

recommendation includes $2,000,000 above the budget request to 

continue this project. 

Fort Peck-Dry Prairie Rural Water System, Montana.—The Committee recommendation is $14,000,000. $9,000,000 of these funds 

should be applied to the tribal portions of the water system. These 

funds should be utilized in addition to the normal tribal/non-tribal 

split of the underlying funded amount in the budget ($4,000,000) 

and provided by the Committee ($1,000,000). 

Milk River/St. Mary’s Diversion Project.—The Committee urges 

the Bureau of Reclamation to combine NEPA compliance activities 

and preparation of design, specifications, and contract documents 

for the entire St. Mary’s project including the diversion dam, fish 

passage structure, drop structures, siphon, and canal as a single 

activity. 

Rocky Boys/North Central Montana Rural Water System, Montana.—The Committee recommendation is $16,000,000. 

$11,000,000 of these funds should be applied to the tribal portions 

of the water system. These funds should be utilized in addition to 

the normal tribal/non-tribal split of the underlying funded amount 

in the budget ($1,000,000) and provided by the Committee 

(4,000,000). 

Jicarilla Apache Reservation Rural Water System, New Mexico.— 

The Committee recommendation includes an additional $4,000,000 

above the budget request to continue work on this tribal water system. 

Navajo-Gallup Water Supply, New Mexico.—The Committee recommendation includes $7,791,000 for continued work on this tribal 

water project. 

Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin, Garrison Diversion Unit, North Dakota.—Within the Committee recommendation, $52,000,000 is rec-
85 

ommended for rural water projects. Of this amount, $26,000,000 

shall be expended for the following projects: $8,000,000 for the 

Northwest Area Water Supply; $9,000,000 for the South Central 

Regional Water District; and $9,000,000 for the Southwest Pipeline. Additionally the Committee recommends $2,000,000 for the 

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Irrigation Project. The Committee directs Reclamation to rexamine the Federal cost estimate of the annual operating costs of the Three Affiliated Tribes water system. 

Oregon Investigations Program, Oregon.—$150,000 above the 

budget request is recommended for developing appraisal-level designs and cost estimates for Umatilla on-reservation distribution 

systems. 

Rogue River Basin Project, Talent Division.—The Committee recommendation includes $200,000 for the Water for Irrigation 

Streams and Economy Feasibility study. 

Mni Wiconi Project, South Dakota.—The Committee recommendation is $33,280,000. $10,000,000 of these funds should be 

applied to the tribal portions of the water system. These funds 

should be utilized in addition to the normal tribal/non-tribal split 

of the underlying funded amount in the budget ($17,280,000). 

Northern Utah Investigations Program, Utah.—The Committee 

has recommended an additional $500,000 for the Rural Water 

Technology Alliance. 

Weber Basin Project, Utah.—The Committee recommends 

$1,000,000 for feasibility studies to increase the storage capacity of 

the reservoir impounded by the Arthur V. Watkins Dam. 

Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Washington.— The Committee recommends an additional $1,500,000 above the 

budget request for the Yakima River Basin Water Storage Plan to 

address water shortages in the basin. 

Drought Emergency Assistance.—The Committee has provided 

the budget request for this program. Within the funds provided, 

the Committee urges the Bureau of Reclamation to provide full and 

fair consideration for drought assistance from the State of Hawaii. 

Lower Colorado River Operations Program.—The Committee recommendation includes $680,000 above the budget request for the 

Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Plan for California. 

Research and Development, Science and Technology Program.— 

The Committee recommends $1,000,000 above the budget request 

for Quagga and Zebra Mussel research activities. The Committee 

is concerned about the impacts to western waters of these two 

invasive species. Reclamation efforts to date have necessarily focused on addressing the problems caused by the mussels at Reclamation facilities. The Committee believes that Reclamation 

should establish a research program geared toward eradicating or 

controlling these invasive species. 

Title XVI, Water Reclamation, and Reuse.—The Committee has 

provided $2,500,000 for the WateReuse Foundation. These funds 

are available to support the Foundation’s research priorities. 

Water Conservation Field Services Program.—Within the 

amounts provided, Reclamation is urged to continue urban water 

conservation projects identified through the Metropolitan Water 

District of Southern California Innovative Conservation Program; 
86 

industrial water efficiency surveys to assess opportunities to conserve water in industrial water use; and for weather based irrigation controller activities to pilot ways to speed distribution and acceptance of these landscape water efficiency devices. 

Water Conservation Initiative.—The Committee encourages Reclamation to work with Water Research Laboratory at Utah State 

University to expand water quality monitoring in the Cache Valley, 

Utah, to provide the necessary data to reduce the uncertainty of 

water quality management decisions pertaining to Cutler Reservoir 

and to reduce the cost of maintaining and improving water quality 

in the region. 

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $56,079,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 35,358,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 35,358,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $35,358,000 for 

the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund. 

The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized in 

the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of Public Law 

102–575. This fund was established to provide funding from project 

beneficiaries for habitat restoration, improvement and acquisition, 

and other fish and wildlife restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of California. Revenues are derived from payments 

by project beneficiaries and from donations. Payments from project 

beneficiaries include several required by the act (Friant Division 

surcharges, higher charges on water transferred to non-CVP users, 

and tiered water prices) and, to the extent required in appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation and restoration payments. 

CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION

(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $40,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 31,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 41,000,000 

This account funds activities that are consistent with the 

CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18 

State and Federal agencies and representatives of California’s 

urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals of 

the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water supply 

reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay-San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California’s water distribution system. 

POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $59,400,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 61,200,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 61,200,000 

The Committee recommendation for general administrative expenses is $61,200,000. 

The policy and administrative expenses program provides for the 

executive direction and management of all reclamation activities, 

as performed by the Commissioner’s offices in Washington, DC, 
87 

Denver, Colorado, and five regional offices. The Denver office and 

regional offices charge individual projects or activities for direct 

beneficial services and related administrative and technical costs. 

These charges are covered under other appropriations. 

GENERAL PROVISIONS—DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Section 201. The bill includes language regarding Bureau of Reclamation Reprogramming. 

Section 202. The bill includes language regarding the San Luis 

Unit and the Kesterson Reservoir in California. 

Section 203. The bill includes language that states requirements 

for purchase or lease of water from the Middle Rio Grande or 

Carlsbad Projects in New Mexico. 

Section 204. The bill includes language regarding Drought Emergency Assistance. 

Section 205. The bill includes language extending a project authorization. 

Section 206. The bill includes language regarding the administration of the Desert Terminal Lakes Program. 

Section 207. The bill includes language regarding the Desert Terminal Lakes Program. 

Section 208. The bill includes language expending funds from the 

Desert Terminal Lakes Program. The National Fish and Wildlife 

Foundation will administer funds for water projects in the Walker 

River Basin, including a demonstration water leasing program to 

be managed by the Walker River Irrigation District. 

Section 209. The Bill includes a provision pertaining to the North 

Dakota Natural Resources Trust. 

Section 210. The bill contains a provision concerning CALFED. 
(88) 

TITLE III 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT [LDRD] 

The Committee recognizes the invaluable role the Laboratory Directed Research and Development [LDRD] program provides to the 

Federal Government and the Nation in general. Discretionary 

LDRD investments have been and will continue to be responsive to 

the energy needs of the Nation, as evidenced by recent R&D 

projects in materials science, optoelectronics, computer science, and 

high-energy density physics. Cutting-edge LDRD research provides 

the science base for energy-specific applications such as fuel cells, 

hydrogen technologies, carbon management, nuclear energy, and 

solid-state lighting. In addition, LDRD is the national labs’ most 

important tool for maintaining the vitality of the national labs in 

support of other national security missions. LDRD enables the labs 

to hire the ‘‘best and brightest’’ young scientists and engineers and 

allows them to seek innovative science and technology solutions for 

current or emerging national security issues, including those of energy security. LDRD investments have been effective in providing 

solutions for today’s energy problems and demonstrate the inherent 

flexibility of the program to provide national security mission support on a very timely basis. Energy climate research needs can best 

be addressed by continuing a vibrant LDRD program at the national laboratories. 

PENSION SHORTFALLS

The Committee includes section 311 in the General Provisions to 

give the Secretary the authority to transfer funds as necessary to 

fully fund pension obligations. Over the last year, the stock market 

performance has had a devastating impact on the defined benefit 

funds of the current and former laboratory and plant employees. As 

required by law, these shortfalls must be closed. All personnel 

costs, including pension obligations are charged to the program as 

an indirect cost. In fiscal year 2009, the NNSA and Environmental 

Management program were forced to redirect nearly $400,000,000 

in mission funding to meeting required pension contributions. At 

the beginning of the year, the Department estimated that 

$1,170,000,000 in pension contributions would be needed; however, 

subsequent estimates have projected shortfalls to increase by an 

additional $260,000,000, a 22 percent increase, which can only be 

recovered through program funding. In the fiscal year 2010 budget 

request, the administration has attempted to provide additional 

funding to the various programs impacted, but significant funding 

gaps remain. In order to minimize the impact to program funding, 

especially those programs that are facing flat or declining budget 
89 

requests, the Committee felt it was prudent to provide the Department with additional authority to minimize the impact to programs 

and personnel. 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDELINES

The Department of Energy is directed to operate in a manner 

fully consistent with the following reprogramming guidelines. A reprogramming request must be submitted to the Committees on Appropriations for consideration before any implementation of a reorganization proposal which includes moving previous appropriations 

between appropriation accounts. The Department is directed to inform the Committees promptly and fully when a change in program 

execution and funding is required during the fiscal year. To assist 

the Department in this effort, the following guidance is provided 

for programs and activities funded in the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. The Department 

is directed to follow this guidance for all programs and activities 

unless specific reprogramming guidance is provided for a program 

or activity. 

Definition.—A reprogramming includes the reallocation of funds 

from one activity to another within an appropriation, or any significant departure from a program, project, activity, or organization 

described in the agency’s budget justification as presented to and 

approved by Congress. For construction projects, a reprogramming 

constitutes the reallocation of funds from one construction project 

identified in the justifications to another project or a significant 

change in the scope of an approved project. 

Any reallocation of new or prior year budget authority or prior 

year deobligations must be submitted to the Committees in writing 

and may not be implemented prior to approval by the Committees 

on Appropriations. 

ENERGY PROGRAMS

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Appropriations, 2009 .............................................................................1 $18,978,540,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 2,318,602,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,233,967,000 

1 Includes Emergency Appropriations of $250,000,000 under Public Law 110–329 and 

$16,800,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee recommendation is $2,233,967,000 for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 

In updating the renewable energy resource assessments required 

by section 201 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Committee recommends that each program area assess the amount of each type 

of renewable energy that can reasonably be expected to be deployed 

by the year 2030. The reports should be modeled on the Department’s 20 percent Wind Energy by 2030 report issued in May 2008. 

The individual resource reports should be integrated into a single 

report that investigates multiple alternative scenarios for the potential deployment of renewable resources by 2030. 

Hydrogen Technology.—The Committee recommends 

$190,000,000, all above the request of $0, to continue funding 189 

contracts the Department has in place for fiscal year 2010, saving 
90 

approximately 140 jobs at universities, 150 at Federal laboratories, 

and 235 jobs within industry. The Committee provides additional 

funds to enable fuel research and development, early market deployment, transformation, and enabling activities in transportation 

applications. The Committee also looks forward to the 2009 release 

of the updated Hydrogen Program Plan that replaces the existing 

Posture Plan, and encourages the Secretary to consider it more 

carefully as the fiscal year 2011 program budget is developed. 

Fuel Cell Technologies.—The Committee recommends $0, rather 

than $68,213,000, as requested, for Fuel Cell Technologies. Fuel 

cell technology can continue to be pursued under the Hydrogen 

Technology program in fiscal year 2010 as it has been in the past. 

Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D.—The Committee recommends $235,000,000, the same as the request. Within the available funds, the Committee directs the Department to provide not 

less than $35,000,000 for a comprehensive research, development 

and deployment strategy focused on algae biofuels. This non-food 

source biofuel offers one of the best opportunities to develop largescale production on non-arable land using non-potable water. The 

Committee encourages the Department to develop a balanced program to address technical challenges related to organism selection, 

cultivation, water usage, biofuel production, and land-use issues. 

The Department should particularly pursue algal biofuels that 

have a high potential to beneficially re-use industrial carbon dioxide and are fungible in existing infrastructure. The Committee expects the Department to enlist the participation and to provide 

funding to universities, laboratories and industry to support this effort. 

Also, within available funds, $7,500,000 is provided for coordination with the Fuels Technology subprogram under Vehicles Technologies to expand and accelerate testing of intermediate fuel 

blends (15 percent–20 percent ethanol mixed with 80 percent–85 

percent gasoline). The testing is performed on vehicles, other engines, and infrastructure components to provide data on how these 

blends may affect materials, durability, performance and emissions, 

and alleviate supply/demand imbalances. Work should be done in 

coordination with the Vehicles Technology Program. 

Solar Energy.—The Committee recommends $255,000,000. From 

within the amount provided, the Committee directs the Department to provide $30,000,000 to support the demonstration and deployment of concentrating solar technology. No funds are provided 

for the Solar Electricity Energy Innovation Hub. 

The Committee notes that flexible solar cell roofing shingles and 

panels have the potential to provide significant distributed, renewable electricity generation. The Committee encourages the Department to support research, development, and demonstration of novel 

technologies, including innovative textiles, which have the potential 

to enhance power generation and reduce production and installation costs of solar cells and panels. 

The budget request provides $30,000,000 to establish a PV Manufacturing Initiative. The National Academies Board on Science, 

Technology, and Economic Policy is exploring the future of PV 

manufacturing in the United States, specifically the economic and 

institutional issues for technology-related public-private partner-
91 

ships, conducting workshops in April, July, and October 2009. The 

Committee directs the Department to develop the PV Manufacturing Initiative consistent with the recommendations of these 

workshops. The Committee recognizes the value of creating a centralized facility to assist solar PV companies in making the transition to commercial production, and encourages the Department to 

create such a facility, consistent with the recommendations of these 

workshops, either at an existing facility to avoid additional mortgage costs, or at a separate facility. 

Wind Energy.—The recommendation is $85,000,000. The committee directs this office and the Office of Electricity to work collaboratively to improve wind systems integration and forecasting 

modeling to facilitate increased deployment of wind energy nationwide. 

Geothermal Technology.—The recommendation for Geothermal 

Technology is $50,000,000, the same as the administration’s request. The Committee directs the Department to provide not less 

than $5,000,000 to develop and deploy low temperature geothermal 

systems. 

Water Power Energy R&D.—The Committee recommends 

$60,000,000, a total of $30,000,000 above the request. The Committee directs that all of the available increase be applied to expand marine and hydrokinetic research, development, and deployment. The Committee directs the Department to use the available 

funding to validate economic and technical viability of a variety of 

technologies and to provide a written report to Congress on the 

prospect of each of the technologies. In addition, the Department 

shall include its research and development priorities and goals for 

this program for the next 5 years. The Department is directed to 

utilize the Department’s only marine sciences laboratory to undertake an R&D program to expand marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy programs consistent with section 633 of EISA 2007. 

Vehicle Technologies.—The Committee recommends 

$323,302,000. The Committee encourages the Department to continue investigating the full portfolio of transportation fuel options 

within the Fuels Technology Program, including biofuels, electricity, natural gas, hydrogen, and other advanced fuels. 

Within available funds, $2,200,000 is provided to the vehicles 

program for the Department to contract with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a comprehensive analysis of energy use 

within the light-duty vehicle transportation sector, and use the 

analysis to conduct an integrated study of the technology and fuel 

options that could reduce petroleum consumption and greenhouse 

gas emissions. 

Also within available funds, $7,500,000 is provided for coordination with the Biomass program to expand and accelerate testing of 

intermediate fuel blends (15 percent–20 percent ethanol mixed 

with 80 percent–85 percent gasoline). The testing is performed on 

vehicles, other engines, and infrastructure components to provide 

data on how these blends may affect materials, durability, performance and emissions, and alleviate supply/demand imbalances. 

The Committee further directs the Department to study the variety and density of recharging infrastructure options necessary to 

support significant penetration of plug-in, electric drive, light-duty 
92 

vehicles. The Department must report back to Congress on the 

progress of the secondary applications and disposal of electric drive 

vehicle batteries program required under Section K of 42 U.S.C. 

17231. 

Building Technologies.—The Committee recommends 

$202,698,000, a decrease of $35,000,000 to the request. No funds 

are provided for the Equipment Standards and Analysis Hub. The 

Committee has continued to invest additional resources in building 

technologies and other renewable technologies, but the Department 

has maintained the same goal of developing a zero-energy home in 

2020. The Committee challenges the Department to better integrate renewable energy technology and focus the buildings research 

to achieve a zero-energy home sooner than the 2020 target date. 

Industrial Technologies.—The Committee provides $100,000,000, 

the same as the request. 

Federal Energy Management Program.—The Committee recommends $32,272,000, the same as the request. The Committee is 

concerned with the lack of progress being made at the Department 

in adapting Congressional direction to reduce its electricity usage 

and support deployment of increased efficiency technologies. The 

May 2009 Inspector General report finds the Department has not 

taken many possible and practical actions to reduce energy consumption associated with its information technology resources. The 

Committee has significantly increased funding to the Department 

for energy efficiency initiatives. Yet, it does not appear that the Department has implemented policies and procedures to save millions 

of dollars annually, i.e., through implementing more energy-efficient computer power management, thin-client computing, and 

data centers which should apply more cost-effective, power efficient 

storage systems. The Committee believes the Department should 

aggressively implement the IG’s ‘‘low-hanging fruit’’ recommendations as well as work with the Office of Science and the NNSA Advanced Computing program to apply innovative technology solutions. The Committee notes these steps should be viewed as the 

bare minimum necessary to meet congressional and presidential directives to the Department. 

RE-ENERGYSE.—The Committee recommends $0, a decrease of 

$115,000,000 from the request. 

Facilities and Infrastructure.—The Committee recommends 

$63,000,000, the same as the request. Of the total, $44,000,000 is 

provided for the South Table Mountain Ingress/Egress and Traffic 

Capacity Upgrades project at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. Through the ARRA, Congress provided 

the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy with 

$16,800,000,000. The Committee would support the Department 

using ARRA funding for the South Mountain Table Ingress/Egress 

and Traffic Capacity Upgrades project, freeing up $44,000,000 for 

energy research in fiscal year 2010. If the Department is able to 

change the funding source for this project, the Committee supports 

the Department using the $44,000,000 to fund the proposed Fuels 

From Sunlight and Energy Efficient Building Systems hubs at 

$22,000,000 each. 

Weatherization Assistance Program.—The Committee recommends $200,000,000. Of that amount, $3,300,000 is for training 
93 

and technical assistance. The Committee understands the Department is looking at non-traditional initiatives to increase the effectiveness of the weatherization program. From within available 

funds, the Committee directs the Department to develop two pilot 

projects, at $35,000,000 each. The first is for the purpose of demonstrating energy savings through use of improved insulating and 

sealing in homes built prior to 1980. The Committee also directs 

the Department to develop a pilot project that would increase the 

leverage of Federal funding through the formation of partnerships 

between the Department and traditional and/or non-traditional 

weatherization providers. The current Weatherization Assistance 

Program leverages less than $1 from non-Federal sources for every 

Federal dollar invested. The Committee hopes the Department 

could attain a $3 to $1 match. 

Intergovernmental Activities.—The Committee recommends 

$50,000,000 for State Energy Programs, $10,000,000 for Tribal Energy Activities, and $5,000,000 for the Renewable Energy Production Incentive. 

Program Direction.—The Committee recommends $152,620,000. 

Program Support.—The Committee recommends $72,000,000. 

The Committee is supportive of two new efforts called Strategic 

Priorities and Impact Analysis and Commercialization, and provides $15,000,000 and $25,000,000 respectively. The Committee understands the International Renewable Energy Program is being 

transferred to this account in fiscal year 2010, where it is being increased to $10,000,000 from the $5,000,000 appropriated in fiscal 

year 2009. Within the funds provided, the Department is directed 

to begin conducting feasibility studies of the most promising strategies and projects identified in the recently updated Territorial Energy Assessment. Authorized by section 252 of the Energy Policy 

Act of 2005, the Assessment is looking at strategies and projects 

that have the greatest potential for reducing the dependence of 

U.S. territories and freely associated states on imported oil. Further, of the International Renewable Energy Program funding, 

$2,000,000 is available to support the U.S.-Israeli energy cooperation agreement. 

Congressionally Directed Spending Items.—The Committee includes $148,075,000 for the following list of projects that provide 

for research, development, and demonstration of energy efficiency 

or renewable energy technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost-sharing requirements may 

apply to these projects. 

The Committee directs $2,000,000 of the total provided to the 

Hawaii Sustainable Energy Security project be used to evaluate the 

efficacy of integrating the full range of renewable energy technologies into electricity grids including, but not limited, to hydro 

electricity, solar, and photovoltaics. Additionally, of the total provided to the Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture 

project, $2,000,000 is to support pilot/commercial scale demonstrations using renewable, nonfossil energy resources that provide documentation of the efficacy of renewable energy technologies and 

measures of the carbon footprint and other environmental impacts 

associated with such projects, which could include but are not limited to cold seawater air conditioning, photovoltaics, and solar. Fi-
94 

nally, of the total provided for the Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks and Biomass Conversion project, $2,000,000 is for 

support of on-farm demonstration of feedstock production and conversion technologies and the Committee recommends expansion of 

these activities to the American Pacific region through a partnership with the Western Insular Pacific Subcenter. 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS 

Project title Amount Requestor 

21st Century Renewable Fuels, Energy, and Materials Initiative ...................................... $1,250,000 Senators Levin, 

Stabenow 

A123Systems Large Format Nanophosphate Batteries for Solar Energy Storage ............. 1,000,000 Senators Levin, 

Stabenow 

Algae Biofuels Research ..................................................................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Murray, 

Cantwell 

Algae to Ethanol Research and Evaluation ....................................................................... 750,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez 

Algal-Based Renewable Energy for Nevada ....................................................................... 800,000 Senator Reid 

Alternative and Unconventional Energy Research and Development ................................ 10,000,000 Senator Bennett 

Alternative Energy School of the Future ............................................................................. 1,200,000 Senator Reid 

Bayview Gas to Energy Project ........................................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Bennett 

Ben Franklin Technology Partners—Clean Technology Commercialization Initiative ....... 500,000 Senator Casey 

Biodiesel Blending .............................................................................................................. 600,000 Senator Kohl 

Biodiesel Feedstock Development Initiative (MO) .............................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Bond 

Biomass Energy Resources Center ..................................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Leahy 

Black Hills State Heating and Cooling Plant ..................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Johnson, 

Thune 

Cellulosic Diesel Biorefinery ............................................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez 

Center for Biomass Utilization ........................................................................................... 7,000,000 Senators Dorgan, 

Conrad 

Center for Nanoscale Energy .............................................................................................. 5,000,000 Senator Dorgan 

Center for Ocean Renewable Energy .................................................................................. 750,000 Senator Shaheen 

Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility ..................................................................... 500,000 Senator Leahy 

Clean Power and Energy Research Consortium ................................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Landrieu 

Commercial Building Energy Efficiency Demonstration ..................................................... 500,000 Senator Durbin 

Cooling Heating and Power (Micro-CHP) and Bio-Fuel Application Center ....................... 2,000,000 Senator Cochran 

Development of an Economic and Efficient Biodiesel Production Process ....................... 750,000 Senator Hagan 

Development of Biofuels Using Ionic Transfer Membranes ............................................... 1,500,000 Senator Reid 

Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks and Biomass Conversion ....................... 6,000,000 Senator Inouye 

DRI Renewable Energy Center [REC] .................................................................................. 500,000 Senator Reid 

Energy Storage/Conservation and Carbon Emissions Reduction Demonstration Project .. 400,000 Senators Kennedy, 

Kerry 

EngenuitySC Commercialization and Entrepreneurial Training Project ............................. 500,000 Senator Graham 

Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Demonstration Energy Park ................................................ 200,000 Senator Reid 

Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel Blanket Process Project ............................................. 300,000 Senators Kennedy, 

Kerry 

Fuel Cell Durability Research ............................................................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Dodd 

Gas heat pump cooperative training program ................................................................... 250,000 Senator Reid 

Genetic Improvement of Switchgrass ................................................................................. 1,500,000 Senator Reed 

Great Basin College—Direct-Use Geothermal Demonstration Project .............................. 1,000,000 Senator Reid 

Great Lakes Institute for Energy Innovation ...................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Voinovich 

Great Plains Wind Power Test Facility, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX .................... 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison 

Hawaii Energy Sustainability Program ............................................................................... 6,000,000 Senators Inouye, 

Akaka 

Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture ............................................................... 6,000,000 Senator Inouye 

High Speed Wind Turbine Noise Model with Suppression ................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Cochran 

Hydrogen Production and Delivery Technology ................................................................... 500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman 

HyperCAST R&D Funding for Vehicle Energy Efficiency ..................................................... 750,000 Senator Bennet 

Independent Energy Community Renewable Power System ............................................... 1,000,000 Senator Bennett 

Institute for Sustainable Energy ......................................................................................... 750,000 Senator Sessions 

Iowa Central Community College Renewable Fuel Testing Laboratory .............................. 750,000 Senator Harkin 

Lane Community College Energy Demonstration Building ................................................. 550,000 Senators Wyden, 

Merkley 
95 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS— 

Continued 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Lansing Plug-In Hybrid Initiative ....................................................................................... 750,000 Senators Levin, 

Stabenow 

Low Cost Production of Thin-film Photovoltaic [PV] Cells ................................................. 1,200,000 Senator Specter 

Marine Energy Technology .................................................................................................. 1,750,000 Senator Murray 

MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy Consortium ........................................................................ 1,000,000 Senators Lincoln, 

Pryor 

Montana Algal BioDiesel Initiative ..................................................................................... 500,000 Senators Baucus, 

Tester 

Montana Bio-Energy Center of Excellence .......................................................................... 2,250,000 Senators Baucus, 

Tester 

Nanostructured Materials for Improved Photovoltaics ....................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Cochran 

Nanostructured Solar Cells for Increased Efficiency and Lower Cost ............................... 500,000 Senators Lincoln, 

Pryor 

National Center of Excellence in Energy Storage Technology ............................................ 1,000,000 Senator Voinovich 

National Open-Ocean Energy Laboratory ............................................................................ 2,000,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez 

National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX ................................... 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison 

Near Zero Carbon Footprint Energy Creation Through Thermal Oxidation ......................... 1,000,000 Senator Specter 

Nevada Renewable Energy Integration and Development Consortium .............................. 3,000,000 Senator Reid 

NIREC—Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization ................................ 1,000,000 Senator Reid 

Northern Nevada Renewable Energy Training Project ........................................................ 500,000 Senator Reid 

Norwich Cogeneration Initiative .......................................................................................... 750,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman 

Novel Photocatalytic Metal Oxides ...................................................................................... 250,000 Senator Ben Nelson 

Offshore Wind Initiative ...................................................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Collins, 

Snowe 

Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center .................................................................... 500,000 Senator Brown 

Oregon Solar Highway—Innovative Use of Solar Technology ............................................ 1,000,000 Senators Wyden, 

Merkley 

Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project ................................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Feinstein 

Power Cube for Wind Power and Grid Regulation Services ............................................... 500,000 Senator Specter 

Renewable Energy Clean Air Project [RECAP] .................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Klobuchar 

Renewable Energy Demonstration ...................................................................................... 500,000 Senator Durbin 

Renewable Energy Feasibility Study and Resources Assessment ...................................... 500,000 Senator Reid 

Renewable Energy Initiative ............................................................................................... 500,000 Senator Durbin 

Renewable Energy Initiatives for Clark County, Nevada Parks and Recreation ............... 1,000,000 Senator Reid 

Research on Fuel Cell Powered by Hydrogen Produced from Biomass to Provide Clean 

Energy for Remote Farms away from Electric Grids.

675,000 Senator Schumer 

San Francisco Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Initiative ..................................................... 500,000 Senator Boxer 

Shenandoah Valley as a National Demonstration Project Achieving 25 Percent Renewable Energy by the Year 2025.750,000 Senators Webb, 

Warner 

Smart Energy Program ........................................................................................................ 500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman 

Solar Compactor Energy Efficiency Research Demonstration Project ................................ 300,000 Senators Kennedy, 

Kerry 

Solar Electric Power for Nonsectarian Educational and Social Services Facility .............. 500,000 Senator Reid 

Solar Energy Development, University of Maine at Presque Isle, ME ................................ 800,000 Senator Collins 

Solar Energy Zone Planning and Infrastructure for the Nevada Test Site and Adjacent 

Lands.

1,000,000 Senator Reid 

Solar Panels in Municipal Owned Buildings ...................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez 

Solar Pioneer and Solar Entrepreneur Programs ................................................................ 500,000 Senator Gillibrand 

Southern Pine Based Biorefinery Center ............................................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Chambliss 

Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Designs ......................................... 4,000,000 Senator Cochran 

Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project ..................................................... 2,500,000 Senators Murkowski, Begich 

Strategic Biomass Initiative ............................................................................................... 500,000 Senator Cochran 

Student Sustainability Initiatives ....................................................................................... 300,000 Senator Sanders 

Sun Grant Initiative ............................................................................................................ 2,750,000 Senator Johnson 

Sustainable Energy Research Center ................................................................................. 10,000,000 Senator Cochran 

Switchgrass Biofuel Research: Carbon Sequestration and Life Cycle Analysis ................ 500,000 Senator Ben Nelson 

The CUNY Energy Institute ................................................................................................. 1,550,000 Senators Schumer, 

Gillibrand 
96 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS— 

Continued 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & Development .............................................................. 500,000 Senator Leahy 

Unconventional and Renewable Energies Research Utilizing Computer Simulations ....... 2,500,000 Senator Bennett 

University of Louisville Research and Energy Independence Program .............................. 2,000,000 Senator McConnell 

University of New Haven Solar Testing and Training Lab ................................................. 500,000 Senator Dodd 

UNR—Biodiesel from Food Waste ...................................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Reid 

UNR—Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy ............................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Reid

UNR—Mass Exchanger Technology for Geothermal and Solar Energy Systems ............... 1,200,000 Senator Reid 

Vermont Biofuels Initiative ................................................................................................. 750,000 Senator Leahy 

Vermont Energy Investment Corporation ............................................................................ 450,000 Senator Sanders 

Wallowa County Integrated Biomass Energy Center .......................................................... 500,000 Senators Wyden, 

Merkley 

Washoe Wind Turbine Demonstration Project ..................................................................... 50,000 Senator Reid 

Wind Turbine Development ................................................................................................. 1,000,000 Senators Baucus, 

Tester 

Wind Turbine Infrastructure for Green Energy and Research on Wind Power in Delaware 1,000,000 Senators Carper, 

Kaufman 

ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $4,637,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 208,008,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 179,483,000 

1 Includes Emergency Appropriations of $4,500,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee provides $179,483,000 for Electricity Delivery 

and Energy Reliability. No funding is provided for the Grid Materials, Devices and Systems Hub. 

The Committee is supportive of the increased investment in 

cyber security funding to support a coordinated research and development strategy that will improve the security of our national electricity grid and establish the appropriate protocols and policies for 

the integration on smart grid technology and to validate and test 

SCADA technologies and software. To ensure the effective deployment of this technology in the electric transmission system the 

Committee directs the Department to establish a private sector organization to identify vulnerabilities, and develop research and development and deployment strategies. It is important the users, 

owners and operators of the bulk power system are able to work 

with Federal agencies and laboratories to test and validate technologies and software and develop and disseminate best practices 

to ensure the thorough deployment of the state-of-the-art technology. In addition, this organization must include broad representation of owners, operators, users, and technology providers. Due to 

the international threat the Department should include other countries that face similar cyber security threats to share best practices 

to the extent possible. The Committee recommends that the Department provide up to 50 percent of the funding for cyber security 

to establish the organization and execute the recommended research, development and deployment strategy. 

Congressionally Directed Spending Items.—The Committee includes $6,475,000 for the following list of projects that provide for 

research, development, and demonstration of electricity delivery 

and energy reliability technologies or programs. The Committee re-
97 

minds recipients that statutory cost-sharing requirements may 

apply to these projects. 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY PROJECTS 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Energy Development and Reliability ................................................................................... $325,000 Senator Dorgan 

Navajo Nation Electrification Program ............................................................................... 1,750,000 Senators Bingaman, 

Tom Udall 

North Dakota Energy Workforce Development .................................................................... 1,900,000 Senator Dorgan 

Oswego County BOCES Wind Turbine Model Project .......................................................... 200,000 Senator Schumer

Power Grid Reliability and Security .................................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Murray, 

Cantwell 

Technology Development ..................................................................................................... 300,000 Senator Dorgan 

UVM Smart Energy Grid Research ...................................................................................... 500,000 Senator Leahy 

Watkins Glen, Schuyler County Gas Storage project .......................................................... 500,000 Senator Gillibrand 

NUCLEAR ENERGY

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $792,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 761,274,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 761,274,000 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The Committee recommendation for nuclear energy research and 

development totals $761,274,000. 

Integrated University Program.—The Committee provides 

$5,000,000 to restore funding to current year levels and sustain the 

ongoing collaboration between the Office of Nuclear Energy, 

NNSA’s Office of Nuclear Nonproliferation and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support the education and training of engineers and scientists in nuclear engineering, as well as nonproliferation, nuclear forensics, and nuclear safeguards missions. This funding is to be used consistent with the authorization provided in section 313 of Public Law 111–8. This funding is not intended to supplant university research funding provided within the nuclear energy research and development activities. Studies by the American 

Physical Society, American Association for the Advancement of 

Science, and the American Nuclear Society recommended Federal 

investment in university research and training in nuclear engineering and forensics as well. 

Nuclear Power 2010.—The Committee recommends $120,000,000, 

an increase of $100,000,000. This funding is to be used to support 

the engineering design work of U.S. reactor designs in the development of a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Not only will this reactor design facilitate deployment in the 

United States, but will also support export sales, where there is 

strong interest in nuclear power. 

Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems.—The Committee recommendation is $143,000,000. The Committee has shifted 

$10,000,000 to the Research Reactor Infrastructure program to 

support university-led research and fund critically important equipment upgrades. 

Within the available funds, $10,000,000 is provided to focus on 

existing light water reactor technology life extension. Consistent 

with the MIT Study ‘‘Update of the MIT 2003 Future of Nuclear 
98 

Power’’ the Committee directs the Department to evaluate the 

issues related to extending the life of the existing light water reactors to 80 years and support research to increase the power output 

of future light water reactors. 

The Committee is concerned the budget request for this program 

lacks focus and mission. This is demonstrated by the fact that this 

budget reverses the previous decision by the program to focus on 

two advanced reactor technologies in favor of supporting research 

on six different technologies. This is a step backwards and unproductive in advancing deployment of new reactor designs. The Committee directs the program to select two reactor technologies in fiscal year 2010 and focus its research on those designs that offer the 

best opportunity to realize commercial deployment, a high level of 

safety and efficiency and exhibit the best waste management characteristics. 

The Committee does believe advanced computing and simulation 

can play a critical role in developing advanced fuels and modeling 

reactor performance. As such, the Committee supports the establishment of the Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation. Advanced computing can only be effective if its software codes 

are supported by validated experiments which are supported by the 

Fuel Cycle Research and Development program. The Committee 

also recommends this office support an industry cost shared demonstration program to develop and test high performance light 

water reactor fuel utilizing ceramic cladding. 

The Committee appreciates the fact that ongoing nuclear research is being performed in aging nuclear facilities at our national 

laboratories and campuses. The Committee believes investment in 

these facilities is critical if the Department is going to support a 

robust research program to develop advanced fuels and reactor 

technologies. The Committee recommends $20,000,000 from within 

the available funding to be divided evenly between Oak Ridge and 

Los Alamos National Labs for hot cell and nuclear testing infrastructure. The Committee has also made additional investment in 

university research reactors and the Idaho National Laboratory infrastructure as well. 

Fuel Cycle Research and Development.—The Committee recommends $145,000,000 for this program, the same as current year 

levels. The Committee cannot support the proposed innovation hub 

in extreme materials in light of the termination of the LANSCE 

Facility upgrade at Los Alamos, which offers the best existing opportunity to serve the extreme materials research mission. Like the 

Generation IV program, this program request lacks specificity, yet 

the mission is critical to addressing our current and future spent 

fuel needs, especially in light of the administration’s decision to 

abandon Yucca Mountain. Consistent with the recommendations 

proposed in the MIT Update Study, the Committee directs the Department to support the following R&D strategy: (1) Continue to 

support fuel separations technologies to validate and demonstrate 

the capability of technologies and processes that will produce separate fuel, actinides and fission byproducts and produce new fuel 

pellets for testing; (2) expand the capability to utilize computer 

simulation and modeling to support this mission; (3) consider alternatives to the existing waste management strategy to support a 
99 

wider variety of waste solutions including long term geologic repositories and interim strategies (funding may be provided to support site specific research and characterization, in order to develop 

fuels that improve long-term waste handling and storage requirements); and (4) develop a strategy in cooperation with industry to 

support material protection control and accounting of nuclear material. 

RADIOLOGICAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

Space and Defense Infrastructure.—The Committee recommends 

the budget request for this activity at $47,000,000. 

Research Reactor Infrastructure.—The Committee recommends 

$15,000,000 for this activity to support facility upgrades at reactor 

facilities and equipment purchases for universities that support nuclear engineering programs consistent with historic funding levels. 

The budget request had buried this activity within the Idaho facilities management program. 

Pu–238 Production Restart Project.—The Committee recommends 

no funding for this program at this time. The Committee understands the importance of this mission and the capability provided 

to other Federal agencies. However, the Department’s proposed 

plutonium reprocessing program is poorly defined and lacks an 

overall mission justification as well as a credible project cost estimate. Sustaining the plutonium mission is a costly but an important responsibility. The Committee expects the Department to work 

with other Federal agency customers to develop an equitable and 

appropriate cost-sharing strategy to sustain this mission into the 

future. 

IDAHO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

The Committee recommends $211,274,000. The Committee opposes the Department’s decision to included research reactor funding within the Idaho Facilities Management line. The additional 

funding provided in this account and the funds provided for research reactors shall be applied to support upgrades to the Advanced Test Reactor Life Extension program for a total increase of 

12,700,000 for the ATR. This is a one-of-a-kind user facility supporting research and mission need for Federal customers, academia, and commercial users that must be maintained. The Committee recognizes that this account has received $45,000,000 in additional funding to offset shortfalls in pension funding caused by 

poor market performance. Without these funds, mission priorities 

and goals would be compromised. 

PROGRAM DIRECTION

The Committee recommends $73,000,000 to Program Direction, 

consistent with the budget request. 

Congressionally Directed Spending Items.—The Committee includes $2,000,000 for the following list of projects that provide for 

research, development, and demonstration of nuclear energy technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost-sharing requirements may apply to these projects. 
100 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR ENERGY PROJECTS 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Nuclear Fabrication Consortium ......................................................................................... $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich 

FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $4,276,320,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 617,565,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 699,200,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $3,400,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee recommendation for Fossil Energy Research and 

Development is $699,200,000. No funds are provided for the Clean 

Coal Power Initiative and FutureGen because of substantial increases in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The Committee urges the Department to work thoroughly but expeditiously 

to utilize these funds as well as to expand its efforts on innovative 

concepts for beneficial reuse of carbon dioxide activities. The Committee has also added bill language to permit the Department to 

vest title to property acquired for all programs under Fossil energy 

appropriations in the same manner as authorized for the Clean 

Coal Power Initiative. 

Fuels and Power Systems.—The Committee recommends 

$428,200,000 for fuels and power systems which is $24,300,000 

above the request. The recommendation includes $58,000,000 for 

Innovations for Existing Plants [IEP]. The IEP program is directed 

to continue carbon capture research for the existing fleet. Of the 

IEP funds, $10,000,000 is for Federal laboratories, in collaboration 

with universities, to continue research and development on the critical link between water and fossil energy extraction including unconventional fossil energy resources and utilization. The Committee 

also supports $5,000,000, in additional research for the mercury research program. The Committee provides $2,000,000 for the Department to work with utilities, cooperatives, and municipalities to 

perform an assessment of coal-fired power plants in the existing 

U.S. fleet that would be suitable candidates for consideration of 

CO2 capture retrofits. The Committee expects the Department to 

assess the retrofit capacity based on a wide range of variables, including available space, water supplies, sequestration potential, 

labor, and other options. The Committee expects the Department 

to provide the estimated cost and schedule for the various control 

technology options that are known at this time. The Committee 

recommends $65,000,000 for the Advanced Integrated Gasification 

Combined Cycle activities and $32,000,000 for the Advanced Turbines program. The Committee recommends $160,200,000 for Carbon Sequestration activities but does not support the request for 

the hub. The Committee has provided $5,000,000 to be applied to 

advanced computational modeling and visualization to be applied 

to the large regional sequestration demonstration projects research. 

The Committee has further provided $5,000,000 for the Department to explore co-sequestration technology opportunities. The 

Committee recommends $25,000,000 for Fuels to support both fuels 

research from coal liquids and hydrogen. Within available funds for 

Fuels, the Committee recommends adequate funding to continue 
101 

the integrated coal-biomass research activities. The Committee recommends $58,000,000 for Fuel Cell research. The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for Advanced Research, including $3,000,000 

for computational energy sciences. 

Natural Gas Technologies.—The Committee recommendation includes $25,000,000. Of this amount $15,000,000 is provided to 

methane hydrates, and $5,000,000 is for research to continue to develop solutions to minimize the impact or develop treatment technologies for produced water as a by-product of natural gas production. Within the remaining funding, the Committee recommends 

supporting unconventional natural gas production from basins that 

contain tight gas sands, shale gas and coal bed methane resources. 

Unconventional Fossil Energy Technologies.—The Committee recommends $25,000,000 to establish an unconventional fossil energy 

technologies program to replace the Oil Technologies program that 

was not funded in this budget request. The Committee recognizes 

the vast potential to increase the domestic production of on-shore 

unconventional oil, natural gas and coal resources but acknowledges the technological, economic and environmental challenges related to their production. The Committee recommends $20,000,000 

to establish a comprehensive research, development and technology 

deployment strategy to focus a range of unconventional oil, gas and 

coal resources. In demonstrating technology applications, the program should look to deploy new or validate existing technology applications and should consider demonstrations located on state or 

Federal lands. The Committee encourages the Department to include funding for interdisciplinary university, laboratory and industry consortia to develop and test technology and productions methods. Within available funds, the Committee recommends 

$1,200,000 to continue the Risk Based Management System and 

the continuation of the stripper well program. 

The Committee recognizes the tremendous potential that computational visualization can offer in the development and efficient 

production of unconventional fossil resources in an environmentally 

responsible manner. The Committee directs the Office of Fossil Energy, the Office of Science and NNSA’s Advanced Computing and 

Simulation [ASC] program to work in collaboration with universities and industry to establish a joint program to develop a research, development and demonstration strategy and make awards 

to enhance domestic production and minimize the environmental 

impacts utilizing advanced simulation and visualization capabilities. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 be provided to the Office of Fossil Energy and has also provided funds to Office of 

Science and the NNSA’s ASC campaign for this joint effort. 

Program Direction.—The Committee recommends $158,000,000 

for Program Direction, of which $125,150,000 is for the National 

Energy Technology Laboratory. 

Other Programs.—The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for 

Plant and Capital Equipment. The Committee recommends 

$10,000,000 for Fossil Energy Environmental Restoration. The 

Committee recommends $700,000 for the Special recruitment programs. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for Cooperative research and development. The Committee continues to support the 

Department’s project management efforts and the role of the Na-
102 

tional Energy Technology Laboratory [NETL], with the assistance 

of the Golden Field Office, in setting up a successful Project Management Center [PMC]. The Committee encourages the Office of 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to continue collaboration 

and funding of the PMC with the NETL. 

Congressionally Directed Projects.—The Committee recommends 

$27,300,000 for the following congressionally directed projects. 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED FOSSIL ENERGY PROJECTS 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Design and Test of an Advanced SOFC Generator in PA .................................................. $1,000,000 Senator Specter

Fossil Fuel Research and Development .............................................................................. 4,000,000 Senators Dorgan, 

Conrad 

Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium .................................................................. 1,200,000 Senator Cochran 

Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing Station ...................................................................................... 1,200,000 Senator Byrd 

Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Development of a Coal Liquefaction Sector in China.1,250,000 Senator Byrd 

Montana ICTL Demonstration ............................................................................................. 1,250,000 Senator Baucus 

National Center for Hydrogen Technology .......................................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, 

Conrad 

Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic Membranes ................................................................ 1,500,000 Senator Bennett 

Shallow Carbon Sequestration Pilot Demonstration (MO) .................................................. 2,400,000 Senator Bond 

Utah Center for Ultra-Clean Coal Utilization and Heavy Oil Research ............................. 8,000,000 Senator Bennett 

Utah Coal and Biomass to Fuel Pilot Plant ....................................................................... 2,500,000 Senator Bennett 

NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $19,099,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 23,627,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 23,627,000 

The Committee recommends $23,627,000 for fiscal year 2010, the 

same as the budget request for the operation of the naval petroleum and oil shale reserves. The Department is directed to operate 

the field as close to maximum efficiency as possible, given available 

funds. 

STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $205,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 229,073,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 259,073,000 

The Committee recommends $259,073,000 for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Of these funds, the Committee directs the Department to use $30,000,000 for engineering activities at the Richton, 

Mississippi expansion site. While the Committee has provided for 

the operation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, it does not support any other expansion activities at this time. The Committee 

also provides for the purchase of a commercial storage cavern to replace an existing Strategic Petroleum Reserve cavern due to environmental risk at the Bayou Choctaw, Louisiana site. 

NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $9,800,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 11,300,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 11,300,000 
103 

The Committee recommends $11,300,000, the same as the budget 

request. 

ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $110,595,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 133,058,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 110,595,000 

The Committee recommends $110,595,000 for the Energy Information Administration. 

NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $744,819,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 237,517,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 259,829,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $483,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee’s recommendation for Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup is $259,829,000, a total of $22,312,000 above the 

request. 

Reprogramming Control Levels.—In fiscal year 2010, the Environmental Management program may transfer funding between operating expense funded projects within the controls listed below 

using guidance contained in the Department’s budget execution 

manual [DOE M 135.1–1A, Chapter IV]. All capital construction 

line item projects remain separate controls from the operating 

projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of Congressional response. The Committee recommends the following reprogramming control points for 

fiscal year 2010: 

—Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning; 

—Gaseous Diffusion Plants; 

—Small Sites; and 

—West Valley Demonstration Project. 

Internal Reprogramming Authority.—Headquarters Environmental Management may transfer up to $2,000,000, one time, between accounts listed above to reduce health and safety risks, gain 

cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a program or project 

is not increased or decreased by more than $2,000,000 in total during the fiscal year. 

The reprogramming authority—either formal or internal—may 

not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding levels 

for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased by Congress 

in the act or report. The Committee on Appropriations in the 

House and Senate must be notified within 30 days after the use of 

the internal reprogramming authority. 

Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning.—The Committee recommends $7,652,000, the same as the 

request. 

Gaseous Diffusion Plants.—The Committee recommends 

$104,444,000, the same as the request. 
104 

Small Sites.—The Committee recommends $82,233,000, an increase of $14,886,000 above the request. An additional $10,000,000 

is provided to Moab, bringing the fiscal year 2010 total to 

$40,671,000, and an additional $4,886,000 is provided to continue 

ongoing surveillance and operation of groundwater treatment systems and completion of the decontamination and decommissioning 

of two reactor facilities at Brookhaven National Laboratory. 

West Valley Demonstration Project.—The Committee recommends 

$65,500,000, an increase of $7,426,000 above the request, to maintain progress on cleanup. 

URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING

FUND

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $925,503,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 359,377,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 588,322,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $390,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee’s recommendation is $588,322,000, an increase of 

$228,945,000 over the request to sustain cleanup activities at the 

Paducah, Kentucky Gaseous Diffusion plant consistent with fiscal 

year 2009 level of $116,446,000 for cleanup. The Committee provides $225,000,000 for East Tennessee Technology Park and 

$246,876,000 for Portsmouth, both as requested. We note there is 

no request for reimbursement for Uranium/Thorium cleanup contracts, and therefore provide nothing in our recommendation. 

The Committee did not adopt the administration’s proposed 

$200,000,000 tax on uranium fuel. The Committee is aware of the 

fact that over $5,000,000,000 in available funding remains in the 

UED&D fund. If this administration is serious about this cleanup 

effort it should demonstrate it by increasing the funding requests, 

not through budgetary gimmicks. 

SCIENCE

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $6,372,636,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 4,941,682,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 4,898,832,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $1,600,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee recommends $4,898,832,000 for the Office of 

Science. The Committee applauds the successes, which have been 

achieved when the Department of Energy has collaborated with the 

National Institutes of Health [NIH]. These successes include the 

human genome project, advances in bioinformatics, and breakthroughs in atomic resolution structural biology. The Committee 

strongly encourages the DOE Office of Science and the National 

Laboratories to reach out to the NIH to institutionalize senior level 

contacts with the goal of identifying opportunities for sustained collaboration in research and development. The Committee notes that 

long-lasting relationships are necessary to build the types of integrated collaborative programs that could bring about breakthroughs in biomedical imaging, systems biology, and other key 

areas of research. The Committee directs the Office of Science, in 

consultation with the NNSA, to review all radioactive materials 

held by the Department of Energy and to work with science, med-
105 

ical, industrial and agricultural groups to ascertain if available inventories can be used in industrial or medical applications and how 

to improve the utilization of existing sources and avoid further production or importation of new sources. Finally, the Office of 

Science, working with all the relevant offices, is directed to make 

recommendations for investment in U.S. facilities including research reactors or accelerators that could be upgraded to provide 

domestic sources for medical and industrial applications. 

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS

The Committee recommends $813,000,000 for High Energy Physics. The Committee questions the increased investment in Large 

Hadron Collider [LHC] support when the timing of the restart of 

the LHC is in doubt. The Committee urges the Office of Science 

and the LHC managers to improve communication on the status of 

the LHC. 

NUCLEAR PHYSICS

The Committee recommends $540,000,000 for Nuclear Physics. 

Within the funds provided, $17,500,000 is for nuclear medicine 

medical application research. The Committee emphasizes its commitment to nuclear medicine medical application research at the 

Department of Energy. All of the added funds must be awarded 

competitively in one or more solicitation that includes all sources— 

universities, the private sector, and Government laboratories. 

Funding for nuclear medicine application research was previously 

within the Biological and Environmental Research program. 

BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

The Committee recommends $604,182,000 for Biological and Environmental Research. The Committee recognizes the international 

communities’ reliance on the NNSA laboratories expertise in climate change modeling and continues to believe the NNSA laboratories are well equipped to develop and deploy a national system 

for science-based stewardship that combines advanced modeling, 

multi-scale monitoring, and impact analysis tools. These laboratories, with their experience in nuclear weapons nonproliferation 

and their unique capabilities across a wide range of technical resources are able to make a significant contribution in the development and implementation of a comprehensive climate research 

strategy. The Committee directs the Office of Science to continue 

to work closely with the NNSA laboratories on climate change modeling. 

BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES

The Committee recommends $1,653,500,000 for Basic Energy 

Sciences. Of these funds $154,240,000 is provided for construction 

activities as requested in the budget. The remaining $1,499,260,000 

is for research. The Committee does not accept the proposed new 

break out of subaccounts within Basic Energy Sciences as proposed 

by the budget. 

Within the research funds provided $35,000,000 is for the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research [EPSCoR]. 
106 

The EPSCoR program is currently funding energy research that 

will help reduce our dependence on foreign oil. EPSCoR States 

have significant energy resources, contain or are near national laboratories and already undertake research in areas of importance to 

the Department and Nation. In fact, 6 of the top 10 energy-producing States are EPSCoR States. In order to keep up with the increased national focus on energy, the Committee recommends that 

the limit of one Implementation Grant per EPSCoR State be removed and the cap on the maximum allowable award be increased 

to $2,500,000. 

Within the funding provided, $15,000,000 is provided to develop 

a second target station at the Spallation Neutron Source. The Committee strongly encourages the Office of Science to fully fund all 

major items of equipment requested in the budget and provide full 

funding of facility operations within this account. 

ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH

The Committee recommends $399,000,000 for Advanced Scientific Computing Research. The Committee expects the Office of 

Science to continue to support joint research with the NNSA laboratories through the Institute for Advanced Architecture and Advanced Algorithms. Within the available funds, $5,000,000 shall be 

provided to collaborate in a joint program to enhance the production of unconventional fossil energy using advanced simulation and 

visualization. 

FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES

The Committee recommends $416,000,000 for Fusion Energy 

Sciences. 

SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE

The Committee recommends $133,600,000 to support infrastructure activities, the same as the budget request. 

SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY

The Committee recommends $83,000,000 for Safeguards and Security activities, the same as the budget request. The program provides funding for physical security, information protection, and 

cyber security for the national laboratories and facilities of the Office of Science. 

SCIENCE PROGRAM DIRECTION

The Committee recommends $194,722,000 for the Office of 

Science Program Direction. The reduction from the budget request 

reflects the Committee’s primary continued concern about the proposed large increase for field office personnel. The Committee supports the $8,916,000 for the Office of Science and Technical Information. 

SCIENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

These initiatives support the mission of the Department’s Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists program. The Committee recommends $20,678,000, the same as the budget request. 
107 

Congressionally Directed Spending Items.—The Committee includes $41,150,000 for the following list of projects that provide for 

research, development, and demonstration of science technologies 

or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost 

sharing requirements may apply to these projects. 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SCIENCE PROJECTS 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering Equipment ...................................................... $1,000,000 Senator Lugar 

Alaska Climate Center ........................................................................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Murkowski 

Antibodies Research ........................................................................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, 

Conrad 

Carbon Nanotube Technology Center [CANTEC] ................................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Inhofe 

Center for Advanced Bio-Based Binders and Pollution Reduction Technologies at the 

University of Northern Iowa.

950,000 Senator Grassley 

Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems ................................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Byrd 

Center of Excellence and Hazardous Materials .................................................................. 750,000 Senators Bingaman, 

Tom Udall 

Clean Energy Infrastructure Educational Initiative ............................................................ 500,000 Senator Brown 

Climate Model Evaluation Program .................................................................................... 1,800,000 Senator Shelby 

Computing Capability ......................................................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Dorgan, 

Conrad 

Development of Ultrafiltration Membrane-Separation Technology for Energy-Efficient 

Water Treatment and Desalination Process.

800,000 Senator Reid 

Enhancement for the Intermountain Center for River Restoration and Rehabilitation .... 600,000 Senator Bennett 

Environmental Quality Monitoring and Analysis ................................................................ 500,000 Senator Durbin 

Fuel Cell Research, Brown University, RI ........................................................................... 1,500,000 Senators Reed, 

Whitehouse 

Functional MRI Research .................................................................................................... 1,200,000 Senator Leahy 

Idaho Accelerator Center Production of Medical Isotopes ................................................. 1,500,000 Senators Crapo, 

Risch 

Kansas University Cancer Research Equipment ................................................................ 4,000,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts 

Marine Systems Energy/Environmental Sustainability Research ....................................... 300,000 Senators Kennedy, 

Kerry 

Martin County Microfiber Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology Development ............................ 1,000,000 Senators Burr, 

Hagen 

Material Science Smart Coatings ....................................................................................... 500,000 Senator Ben Nelson 

Nanotechnology Initiative .................................................................................................... 750,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman 

Nevada Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization Center [CAVE] .................... 500,000 Senator Reid 

Performance Assessment Institute ..................................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Reid 

Pioneer Valley Life Science Institute Translational Biomedical Research ......................... 400,000 Senators Kennedy, 

Kerry 

Renovation and Development of the LSU Nuclear Science Building ................................. 1,000,000 Senators Landrieu, 

Vitter 

RNAI Research .................................................................................................................... 300,000 Senators Kennedy, 

Kerry 

Science Center Equipment and Energy Efficient LEED Technology ................................... 900,000 Senator Bennett 

Smart Grid Communications Security Project .................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Udall, Mark 

SUU Science Center Energy Efficiency Modernization and Enhancement Project ............. 1,000,000 Senator Bennett 

Targeted Radiotherapy for Melanoma ................................................................................ 300,000 Senators Kennedy, 

Kerry 

Technology Transfer and Commercialization of Technologies at DOE Laboratories .......... 750,000 Senator Bingaman 

The New School Green Building ......................................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Schumer, 

Gillibrand 

USD Catalysis Group for Alternative Energy ...................................................................... 1,100,000 Senator Johnson 

Yttrium–90 Microspheres Research .................................................................................... 1,250,000 Senator Murray 
108 

ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $400,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 10,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ........................... 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $400,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee does not recommend the $10,000,000 requested. 

NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $145,390,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 98,400,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 98,400,000 

The Committee recommends $98,400,000, the same as the request. The Nuclear Waste Fund has a current balance of 

$22,000,000,000 and generates annual interest of just over 

$1,000,000,000 that is added to the corpus. The Committee believes 

that interest accrued, being more than five times the President’s 

fiscal year 2010 budget proposal of $196,800,000, is more than adequate to cover planned activities proposed in this budget request 

and is not aware of any specific strategy to execute the statutory 

obligations to manage both defense and nondefense material consistent with the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Given the Administration’s decision to terminate the Yucca Mountain repository program 

while developing disposal alternatives, the Committee expects the 

Secretary of Energy to suspend collection of payments to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $6,484,880,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 1,543,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 43,000,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $6,000,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

OFFSETTING RECEIPTS

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ¥$19,880,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... ¥1,543,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ¥43,000,000 

NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $6,465,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 1,500,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ........................... 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $7,520,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 20,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 20,000,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $7,510,000,000 under Public Law 110–329 and 

$10,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee recommends the $20,000,000 requested. 
109 

DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

(GROSS)

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $272,643,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 302,071,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 293,684,000 

(MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES)

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ¥$117,317,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... ¥119,740,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ¥119,740,000 

NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $155,326,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 182,331,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ¥173,944,000 

The Committee recommends $293,684,000 for Departmental Administration, which provides a net appropriation of $173,944,000 in 

fiscal year 2010. The Departmental Administration account supports 10 Department-wide management organizations including administrative, human resources, financial, workforce diversity, congressional liaison, and program management functions. 

The January 2009 Small Refineries Exemption Study issued by 

the Department of Energy was intended to determine whether 

small refineries faced a disproportionate economic hardship in 

meeting Renewable Fuel Standard [RFS] requirements beginning 

in 2011. The Committee understands the study contained inadequate small refinery input, did not assess the economic condition 

of the small refining sector, take into account regional factors or accurately project RFS compliance costs. Therefore, the Committee 

does not believe the study is complete, nor is the Department able 

to make the required determination at this time. In view of these 

deficiencies and the importance of the study, the Department is directed to reopen and reassess the Small Refineries Exemption 

Study by June 30, 2010. The Department is specifically directed to 

seek and invite comment from small refineries on the RFS exemption hardship question, assess RFS compliance impacts on small refinery utilization rates and profitability, evaluate the financial 

health and ability of small refineries to meet RFS requirements, 

study small refinery impacts and regional dynamics by PADD, and 

reassess the accuracy of small refinery compliance costs through 

the purchase of renewable fuel credits. Finally, the Committee 

notes that the 2009 study does not estimate the price of tradable 

fuel credits, but the Committee is aware that from 2008 to 2009, 

price has increased nearly threefold. The Committee expects the 

Department to undertake an economic review to estimate the actual economic impact of the RFS on small refineries on a regional 

basis. 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $66,927,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 51,445,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 51,927,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $15,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 
110 

The Committee recommends $51,927,000, the same as the request. 

ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES 

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

WEAPONS ACTIVITIES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $6,410,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 6,384,431,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 6,468,267,000 

The Committee recommends $6,468,267,000 for Nation Nuclear 

Security Administration Weapons Activities. 

DIRECTED STOCKPILE WORK

Life Extension Programs.—The Committee recommends 

$209,196,000 for the Life Extension Program, the same as the 

budget request. 

Stockpile Systems.—The Committee recommends $390,300,000, 

the same as the request. 

Weapons Dismantlement.—The Committee recommends 

$84,100,000, the same as the request. The funding for the Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility has been moved from this program to the Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities (Construction) program. 

Stockpile Services.—The Committee recommends $844,055,000. 

The Committee recommends an increase of $30,000,000 to support 

experimental activities at the Nevada Test Site needed to support 

subcritical experiments in the Science and Advanced Simulation 

and Computing Campaigns. No funding is provided to support the 

transition of the tritium design and gas transfer R&D mission as 

proposed in the Complex Transformation plan. An independent 

study found there was no compelling economic or programmatic 

justification for this move and the transfer fails to deliver any 

amount of budgetary savings. In fact, NNSA’s preferred alternative 

would cost an additional $86,000,000 above the no action alternative. The NNSA has a poor record of transferring mission responsibilities without considerable disruption to the mission. Until 

the NNSA is able to provide both an economic or programmatic justification, the Committee will not support the transfer of tritium 

design and gas transfer R&D missions. 

CAMPAIGNS

The campaigns support scientific research, experimental activities and advanced computation, which make up the core of the 

science-based stockpile stewardship program. This program has enabled the U.S. Government to ensure the safety, reliability, and security of our nuclear weapons stockpile without underground nuclear testing for the past 15 years. However, due to declining investment in the core scientific capabilities, a Task Force Report by 

the Defense Science Board found the lack of funding in the Advanced Computing program will not allow the NNSA to meet its 

nuclear weapons milestones. At the same time, the existing stockpile continues to age presenting new scientific challenges as re-
111 

quired modifications move each system further and further away 

from its test validated state, further taxing the scientific capacity 

of the complex to accurately predict the expected margins and reliability of the aging stockpile. The Committee does not believe this 

level of funding is adequate to support modernization of the complex including critical investment in infrastructure and scientific 

capabilities. The Committee recommends additional funding for 

both categories. The Committee recommends $1,589,230,000 for 

NNSA Campaigns, which is $29,500,000 above the request, but 

$34,120,000 below current year levels. 

Science Campaign.—The Committee recommends $319,690,000, 

an increase of $3,000,000 which is added to Primary Assessment 

Technologies. 

Engineering Campaign.—The Committee recommends 

$150,000,000, consistent with the budget request. 

Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High Yield Campaign.—The Committee provides $453,415,000, an increase of $16,500,000 to restore operation to current year levels for Sandia’s 

Z machine and the University of Rochester Omega facility. The 

Committee is frustrated with NNSA’s inability to provide a balanced program to support full operations at each of the facilities 

which are each critical to understanding the complex high energy 

density science. The Committee provides $54,000,000 to Sandia to 

operate full shift operations and $55,000,000 to the University of 

Rochester to support Omega operations. 

The Committee understands the NNSA is preparing to establish 

an advisory board for the National Ignition Facility experimental 

program, as recommended by the JASONS, and is considering the 

establishment of a national ICF/HED advisory committee. The 

Committee strongly supports the creation of an independent advisory board over the national ICF science and HED physics research. This panel should review the program strategy to ensure 

the experimental program appropriately manages the facilities and 

make recommendations on the appropriate scientific and technical 

aspects of the experimental program. 

The NNSA is to be commended on completing construction of the 

NIF and the Committee encourages the NNSA to focus on the goal 

of ignition, for which this facility was built. 

The Committee is concerned by the sole-source award of target 

development, which is inconsistent with its own policy guidelines. 

The Committee recognizes that competition will drive innovation 

and savings into the program. The Committee expects the NNSA 

to ensure that all future target fabrication solicitations be competitively bid. 

Advanced Simulation and Computing.—The Committee recommends $566,125,000 for the Advanced Simulation and Computing [ASC] Campaign, an increase of $10,000,000. The Committee is frustrated with the continued inconsistency in funding requests between the Office of Science and the NNSA ASC program 

and believes the Department has not done enough to integrate the 

cooperation and research and development between the two programs. 

The Defense Science Board produced a report on Advanced Computing in March 2009. The report outlined five primary conclu-
112 

sions, which this Committee is in full agreement: (1) The advanced 

simulation and computing program is the ‘‘principal tool’’ for assuring the safety and surety of the nuclear deterrent without underground nuclear testing; (2) The NNSA advanced computing program has enabled the United States to be the leader in high performance computing; (3) This program has also advanced the 

science and development of advanced computing which has broad 

applications in national security, energy and the environmental research within the Department of Energy, but other agencies and 

commercial enterprise as well; (4) The ‘‘ASC program needs significantly more resources in the future to achieve the goals stated in 

its roadmaps and planning documents. At currently projected levels 

of funding it will not meet its nuclear weapons milestones in a 

timely manner and perhaps not at all.’’; and (5) The program requires additional resources if the program hopes to achieve the 

next level of high performance computing capability. The Committee expects the Department to provide sufficient resources to 

address the concerns raised by the Advanced Computing Task 

Force report and improve its cooperation between other offices 

within the Department of Energy to apply these advanced computational, visualization and simulation capabilities to solving 

other complex science and energy applications. This point was specifically endorsed by the Defense Science Board Report as well. 

The Committee also urges the Department to continue to support 

the development and collaboration with the Office of Science in development of advanced algorithms and architectures in high performance computing systems. 

The Committee has provided an additional $10,000,000 in this 

program of which $5,000,000 shall be applied to a joint program 

with the Office of Fossil Energy and the Office of Science to work 

in collaboration with universities and industry to improve our capacity to produce domestic unconventional oil and gas resources 

and minimize environmental impact through by utilizing high performance computing capabilities. 

As the demands of stockpile stewardship continue to push the 

limits of parallel computing, power consumption is becoming untenable. While the industry focuses on power-efficient processor technology, there are additional opportunities to increase computational 

performance and optimize energy savings through improvement in 

storage systems. The ASC program is directed to allocate 

$5,000,000 to explore aspects of cost-effective, power-efficient storage systems. 

Readiness Campaign.—The Committee recommends 

$100,000,000 for the Readiness Campaign, consistent with the 

budget request. 

READINESS IN TECHNICAL BASE AND FACILITIES

The Committee recommends $1,848,870,000, an increase of 

$112,522,000 above the request. The funding is provided to fill significant gaps in infrastructure development at the NNSA facilities. 

The Committee has restored funding to support the design effort 

and to minimize job losses associated with the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement facility at Los Alamos and the Uranium Process Facility at Y–12. The facilities replace aging facilities 
113 

which pose a serious threat to worker health and safety and have 

been recommended to be closed by the Defense Nuclear Facilities 

Safety Board. The Committee urges the NNSA to continue the design efforts to develop appropriately sized facilities to support the 

mission needs. 

The Committee has also restored funding for the LANSCE Refurbishment project initiated last year by Congress. This facility is the 

cornerstone of scientific research at Los Alamos serving between 

500–600 users per year. This facility still supports a wide range of 

experiments in both open science and classified work in support of 

the stockpile stewardship mission. The investment in this facility 

upgrade is one of the most cost-effect science investments and will 

support new applications to support advanced materials research. 

The Committee has also rescinded the prior year balances of $42,100,000 for the High Explosive Pressing Facility that was cancelled in this budget upgrade. The Committee recommends $1,519,966,000, for the Readiness in 

Technical Base and Facilities account. This funding supports the 

operations and maintenance of the NNSA laboratories and production facilities, equipment purchases and personnel. Of these funds: 

Operations of Facilities.—The Committee recommends 

$1,329,303,000. 

Program Readiness.—The Committee recommends the requested amount of $73,021,000. 

Material Recycle and Recovery.—The Committee recommends the 

requested amount of $69,542,000. 

Containers.—The Committee recommends the requested amount of $23,392,000. 

Storage.—The Committee recommends the requested amount of $24,708,000. 

Construction.—The Committee recommends $328,904,000, an increase of $125,522,000. The Committee provided this funding to 

make key investment in laboratory and plant infrastructure. 

Project 10–D–501, Nuclear Facilities Risk Reduction, Y–12, Oak 

Ridge, Tennessee.—The Committee provides $12,500,000, as requested to support critical facility upgrades. 

Project 99–D–141, Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility 

SRS.—The Committee recommends $30,321,000, as requested for 

this facility. 

Project 09–D–007, LANSCE Refurbishment Project, Los Alamos, 

New Mexico.—The Committee recommends $30,000,000 to refurbish the LANSCE facility. 

Project 09–D–404, Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.—The Committee 

recommends $13,000,000. 

Project 08–D–801, High Pressure Fire Loop, Pantex, Texas.—The 

Committee recommends $31,190,000 as requested. 

Project 06–D–140, Project Engineering Design [PED], Various Locations.—The Committee recommends $16,200,000. The project account supports ongoing design efforts for the TA–55 Reinvestment 

Project, Phase II at $5,200,000, and the Radioactive Liquid Waste 

Treatment Facility at $11,000,000. 

Project 06–D–141, Project Engineering Design [PED], Uranium 

Process Facility, Y–12, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.—The Committee rec-
114 

ommends $94,000,000 to sustain the design efforts of this facility 

and prevent layoffs of critical design staff. The Committee has separated the UPF project from the other PED projects to improve 

oversight of this project. 

Project 06–D–402, NTS replace Fire Stations 1&2 Nevada Test 

Site, Nevada.—The Committee recommends $1,473,000, as requested. 

Project 04–D–125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Facility Replacement Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico.—The 

Committee recommends $98,000,000 to keep the Radiological laboratory completion and equipment installation on schedule and to 

sustain design efforts of the nuclear facility. 

Project 04–D–128, TA–18, Criticality Experiments Facility, Los 

Alamos National Laboratory, Nevada Test Site, Nevada.—The 

Committee recommends $1,500,000, the same as the budget request. 

SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET

The Committee recommendation for the Secure Transportation 

Asset program is $234,915,000, the same as the budget request. 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS INCIDENT RESPONSE

The Committee recommends full funding of the nuclear weapons 

incident response program. The Committee provides $221,936,000 

as requested. 

FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE RECAPITALIZATION

The Committee provides $154,922,000 for Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization activities, consistent with the budget request. This program was developed to reduce the backlog in deferred maintenance of aging infrastructure facilities throughout the 

complex. 

SITE STEWARDSHIP

The Committee recommends $61,288,000 a reduction of 

$29,086,000. The Committee is supportive of the materials consolidation mission. The Committee has not provided funding for the 

Stewardship planning initiative as the mission priorities are poorly 

defined. The Committee has attempted to restore mission critical 

investments in both science and infrastructure and is unable to 

provide additional funding for the proposed Stewardship planning 

activities. The Committee urges the NNSA to work with the Federal Energy Management Program, including independent third 

party energy providers, the National Renewable Energy Lab, and 

universities to develop a range of solutions in meeting the Federal 

renewable energy goals. The Committee would encourage the Administration to use ARRA funds for this project as long at those 

funds will be able to provide 100 percent of the project and will not 

create any future funding liability for this program. 

SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY

The Committee recommendation for the Safeguards and Security 

Program is $871,555,000, as requested. 
115 

Defense Nuclear Security Operations and Maintenance.—The 

Committee recommends the requested level of $700,044,000. 

Construction.—The Committee recommends $49,000,000, the 

same as the budget request. 

Project 10–D–701 Security Improvement Project Y–12 Plant, Oak 

Ridge, Tennessee.—The Committee recommends full funding of 

$49,000,000 for this project. 

Cybersecurity.—The Committee recommends the full request of 

$122,511,000, which is $1,225,000 above the current year levels. 

The Committee is concerned about increasing attempts to penetrate NNSA firewalls and urges the NNSA to take this threat seriously. 

Use of Prior Year Balances.—The Committee recommends the 

use of $42,100,000 of prior year balances from unexpended balances of the cancelled High Explosive Pressing Facility at Pantex. 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $1,537,350,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 2,136,709,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,136,709,000 

The Committee recommends $2,136,709,000. The Committee has 

provided full funding for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility 

to support the nonproliferation mission of destroying excess plutonium in United States and Russian stockpiles. The Committee is 

aware that the administration is preparing to sign an agreement 

with Russia accepting the use of fast reactors to burn plutonium 

as their preferred path for disposal. The Committee is aware that 

the administration intends to provide $400,000,000 in funding to 

support the Russian effort consistent with previous U.S. policy 

commitments. However, the budget request did not include the estimated $100,000,000 in funding needed to fulfill those commitments in this fiscal year and this Committee does not have the resources to cover this shortfall. In addition, the Committee does not 

include any of the funding requested to support the 

denuclearization work in North Korea. The Committee is supportive of this work, but until relations improve, the Committee 

has applied this funding to improving the U.S. capability to develop 

advanced nuclear nonproliferation and detection technologies. 

NONPROLIFERATION AND VERIFICATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The Committee recommends $337,300,000, an increase of 

$40,000,000 to support expanded investment in developing advanced nuclear detection technologies. Within the available funds, 

the Committee provides $15,000,000 to support the Integrated University Program consistent with the section 313 of Public Law 111– 

8. The program is directed to cooperate with the Office of Nonproliferation and International Security in developing education 

and research funding priorities for advanced nuclear safeguards research. 

Also, within available funds, the Committee provides $6,000,000 

for NNSA laboratories for the purpose of applying their expertise 

and advanced computational, modeling and simulation capabilities 

to the Nation’s space situational awareness requirements. NNSA 
116 

should execute this effort in collaboration with the Air Force’s efforts to ensure the freedom of U.S. space operations and counter 

emerging threats to space operations. 

NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

The Committee recommends $187,202,000 a reduction of 

$20,000,000. The reduction is tied to $40,000,000 in funding requested for North Korea. If, in the future, North Korea renews its 

commitment to denuclearization; the Committee would be willing 

to work with the NNSA to provide additional funding for that mission. 

INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND COOPERATION

The Committee recommends $522,300,000 as requested. The 

Committee has provided strong support to this program over the 

past decade and believes this is an important mission. However, 

the Committee wants to ensure that the U.S. investments in Russian materials control and security are maintained. The Committee 

expects the Russian Government to share in the operations and 

maintenance responsibilities. The Committee intends to closely follow this matter to ensure Russia fulfills its obligations and United 

States resources are not wasted. 

ELIMINATION OF WEAPONS-GRADE PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION

The Committee recommends $24,507,000 as requested by the Administration. 

FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION

The Committee recommends $701,900,000 as requested to support the plutonium disposition program and construction projects. 

U.S. Surplus Fissile Materials Disposition.—The Committee pro- vides for the full request of $126,662,000, including $90,896,000 for 

the U.S. plutonium disposition and $34,691,000 as requested for 

the U.S. uranium disposition program. 

Construction.—The Committee recommends $574,238,000 to support construction as requested. 

Project 99–D–143, Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, Savannah River, South Carolina.—The Committee recommends $504,238 

as requested. 

Project 99–D–141–02, Waste Solidification Building, Savannah 

River South Carolina.—The Committee recommends full funding of $70,000,000 for this project. 

Russian Surplus Materials Disposition.—The Committee recommends $1,000,000, as requested. If President Obama and Russian President Medvedev sign a plutonium disposition strategy, 

this budget does not provide adequate resources to fulfill the U.S. 

requirements under that agreement and additional resources must 

be found. 

GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE

The Committee recommends $333,500,000. The Committee recommendation does not include funding requested for North Korea 

in this program. The Committee recognizes the shortfall in supplies 
117 

of isotope Molybedenum-99 for the use in medical treatments and 

provides $20,000,000 to advance the creation of a domestic supply 

of this isotope. The Committee recommends that not less than 

$10,000,000 within available funds be made available to undertake 

a full inventory of all Department of Energy and NNSA nuclear 

material to determine if there are materials that have value and 

can be reused in other mission or commercial applications. These 

funds are to be shared with the relevant programs across the Department to support the Committee’s direction. In February 2009, 

the Department of Energy Inspector General released a report that 

found that DOE could not account for 37 percent of the quantities 

or location of nuclear materials that had been loaned or leased for 

research or medical purposes. This inventory is managed by the 

Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

through the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards Systems. In addition to the lack of rigorous management of existing inventories, the Committee is concerned that the new nuclear sources 

are being created without consideration of how these will ultimately be tracked, stored and safely disposed. This issue was addressed during March 2009 International Atomic Energy Agency 

workshop, which urged a more comprehensive ‘‘cradle to grave’’ 

management strategy of medical and industrial seal radioactive 

sources. Using the funds provided, the Committee expects this office to work with the Office of Science, the Office of Nuclear Energy, all of the relevant Department of Energy Laboratories, the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other relevant Federal agencies, academia and industry to identify the location, status and proposed disposal pathway for all known radioactive source materials 

and which Federal agency has responsibility for this material. The 

Department of Energy is directed to implement the recommendations made by the Inspector General [DOE/IG–0813] and update 

the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards Systems and 

report to the Committee on Appropriations on the status of any inconsistency in that report or unaccounted materials. 

NAVAL REACTORS

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $828,054,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 1,003,133,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 973,133,000 

The Committee provides $973,133,000 for the Naval Reactor program to provide the U.S. Navy with nuclear propulsion plants that 

are capable of responding to the challenges of 21st century security 

concerns. The Committee recommends $905,533,000 for operations 

and maintenance. The Committee is aware that additional funding 

has been provided to offset pension shortfalls in this program, but 

is concerned that additional funding may be needed. The Committee directs the Secretary to utilize authorities provided in section 311 to prevent any reduction in mission funding. 

Construction.—The Committee recommends $30,000,000 as requested for the various construction projects proposed in the budget request. 
118 

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $439,190,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 420,754,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 420,754,000 

The Committee recommends $420,754,000 of the Office of the Administrator. 

ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES 

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

Appropriations, 2009 .............................................................................1 $10,784,250,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 5,495,831,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 5,763,856,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $5,127,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental 

Cleanup is $5,763,856,000. Within the total provided, the Department is directed to fund the Hazardous Waste Worker Training 

Program [HAZWOPER] at $10,000,000. 

The Committee had hoped with the new administration that the 

Cleanup budget submittal would—for the first time in years—request sufficient funding to be legally compliant. Sadly, it appears 

that the administration decided to lean on the Recovery Act funding to meet many of its fiscal year 2010 compliance milestones. The 

result is that it has deliberately underfunded the base program 

that should have requested funds to meet those fiscal year 2010 

milestones. Next year, rather than parading out expensive new initiatives, the administration should consider meeting its basic legal, 

moral, and human commitments to clean up nuclear research and 

cold war sites. 

The Committee is aware of the potential for significant shortfalls 

in this budget because the program may have to cover defined-benefit pension contributions later this year. We have included a general provision that will permit the Secretary to take steps to address the programmatic shortfalls that could occur once the impact 

of the pension contributions becomes clearer at the end of the calendar year. 

Reprogramming Control Levels.—In fiscal year 2010, the Environmental Management program may transfer funding between operating expense-funded projects within the controls listed below 

using guidance contained in the Department’s budget execution 

manual [DOE M 135.1–1A, Chapter IV]. All capital construction 

line item projects remain separate controls from the operating 

projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of a congressional response. The 

Committee recommends the following reprogramming control 

points for fiscal year 2010: 

—Closure sites; 

—Hanford site; 

—Idaho National Laboratory; 

—NNSA sites; 

—Oak Ridge Reservation; 
119 

—Office of River Protection; 

—Savannah River site; 

—Waste Isolation Pilot Plant; 

—Program Direction; 

—Program Support; 

—Technology Development and Deployment; 

—Safeguards and Security; and 

—All capital construction line items, regardless of site. 

Internal Reprogramming Authority.—The new reprogramming 

control points above obviates, in most cases, the need for internal 

reprogramming authority. However, at the few sites to which the 

internal reprogramming statute still applies, Environmental Management site managers may transfer up to $5,000,000, one time, 

between accounts listed above to reduce health and safety risks, 

gain cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a program or 

project is not increased or decreased by more than $5,000,000 in 

total during the fiscal year. 

The reprogramming authority—either formal or internal—may 

not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding levels 

for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased by Congress 

in the act or report. The Committee on Appropriations in the 

House and Senate must be notified within 30 days after the use of 

the internal reprogramming authority. 

Closure Sites.—The Committee recommends $41,468,000, the 

same as the request. 

Hanford Site.—The Committee recommends $1,023,080,000. An 

additional $53,000,000 is provided for characterization of groundwater, waste sites, and preparation of remedial investigations and 

feasibility studies for the Central Plateau, all aimed at completing 

CERCLA remedial decisions and continuing Central Plateau cleanup in the 2012–2013 timeframe. Another $27,000,000 of the increase is for continued treatment of Mixed Low Level Waste, disposal of Low Level Waste and retrieval and processing of Transuranic Waste. Finally, $40,000,000 is provided to support sludge 

treatment for the K-Basins sludge. The Committee understands the 

Department’s continued support of the B-Reactor Museum and the 

Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response 

[HAMMER] facilities, which are provided for within available 

funds. 

Idaho National Laboratory.—The Committee recommends 

$470,168,000, an increase of $64,000,000 to the request, all for Soil 

and Groundwater Remediation. 

NNSA Sites.—The Committee recommends $291,624,000, an increase of $15,000,000 over the request. The additional $15,000,000 

is for Los Alamos National Laboratory to place two regional ground 

water characterization wells and complete a Field Investigation 

and subsequent Report of Materials Disposal Area AB to maintain 

regulatory compliance. 

Oak Ridge Reservation.—The Committee recommends 

$153,768,000, the same as the request. 

Office of River Protection.—The Committee recommends 

$1,098,000,000, the same as the request. The Waste Treatment and 

Immobilization Plant is funded at $690,000,000, and is considered 
120 

a single line-item construction project. Funding may be moved between subprojects. 

Savannah River Site.—The Committee recommends 

$1,242,974,000, an increase of $33,025,000 above the request. The 

increase is applied to the Soil and Groundwater Remediation 

project, which was unfunded in the request. 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.—The Committee recommends 

$235,337,000. This recommendation includes funding for Carlsbad 

educational support, infrastructure improvements resulting from 

operations at WIPP and for construction of the WIPP digital 

records center, activities the program found meritorious enough to 

support in fiscal year 2009. 

Program Direction.—The Committee recommends $355,000,000, 

the same as the request. The Committee recognizes and supports 

the need for more Federal employees to manage the cleanup contracts. However, the fiscal year 2010 request includes 52 new hires 

at headquarters (∂17 percent), which is more than half the number of new hires at all the field offices combined (∂97, ∂9.3 percent). Cleanup work is done in the field, where the cleanup contracts are executed, not at headquarters. The program would be 

well advised to constrain the number of Headquarters new hires. 

Program Support.—The Committee recommends $34,000,000, the 

same as the request. 

Technology Development and Deployment.—The Committee recommends $55,000,000, the same as the request. This program languished for years without support, or even recognition, of Environmental Management’s long-term mission. The new administration 

seems to be taking a fresh look at the need for break-through technologies that can, as the National Research Council’s March 2, 

2009 report highlights, permit this program to be completed safely, 

cost-effectively, and expeditiously. 

The Committee supports the Technology Development and Deployment program’s involvement this year with the Office of River 

Protection, whose budget includes $50,000,000 to advance solutions 

for the treatment of radioactive waste including pre-treatment 

processes, tank structural integrity, and advanced retrieval technologies. 

Safeguards and Security.—The Committee recommends 

$296,437,000, a total of $17,000,000 above the request. The increase is primarily to avoid workforce impacts where prior year 

funding may no longer be available and to provide for security investigations for field personnel, reflecting a change in Departmental practice. 

Federal Contribution to Uranium Enrichment Decontamination 

and Decommissioning Fund.—The Committee recommends 

$463,000,000, the same as the request. 

Congressionally Directed Spending Items.—The Committee includes $4,000,000 for the following list of projects that provide for 

research, development, and demonstration of defense environmental cleanup technologies or programs. The Committee reminds 

recipients that statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to 

these projects. 
121 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Characteristics and Cleanup of the U.S. Nuclear Legacy ................................................. $4,000,000 Senator Cochran 

OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $1,314,063,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 852,468,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 854,468,000 

The Committee recommendation is $854,468,000, a decrease of 

$461,595,000 from current year levels reflecting the shift for the 

Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility from this program to the Office of Nuclear Nonproliferation. The recommended level is consistent with the budget request. 

Health, Safety and Security.—The Committee recommends 

$449,882,000, as requested. 

Office of Legacy Management.—The Committee recommends 

$189,802,000 as requested. 

Nuclear Energy.—The Committee recommends $83,358,000 for 

Idaho infrastructure for sitewide safeguards and security, the same 

as the request. 

Defense-related Administrative Support.—The Committee recommends $122,982,000, the same as the request. 

Office of Hearings and Appeals.—The Committee recommends 

$6,444,000, as requested. 

Congressionally Directed Spending Items.—The Committee includes $2,000,000 for the following list of projects of Other Defense 

Activities. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost 

sharing requirements may apply to these projects. 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES PROJECTS 

Project title Amount Requestor 

Burlington Atomic Energy Commission Plant [BAECP] and Ames Laboratory Former 

Workers Medical Surveillance Programs [FWP].

$1,000,000 Senator Harkin 

Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN ...................... $1,000,000 Senator McConnell 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $143,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 98,400,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 98,400,000 

The Committee recommends $98,400,000 for Defense Nuclear 

Waste Disposal activities, the same as the request. 

POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS

BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION

The Bonneville Power Administration is the Department of Energy’s marketing agency for electric power in the Pacific Northwest. 

Bonneville provides electricity to a 300,000 square mile service 

area in the Columbia River drainage basin. Bonneville markets the 

power from Federal hydropower projects in the Northwest, as well 

as power from non-Federal generating facilities in the region. Bon-
122 

neville also exchanges and markets surplus power with Canada 

and California. The Committee recommends no new borrowing authority for BPA during fiscal year 2010. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHEASTERN POWER

ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $7,420,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 8,638,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 8,638,000 

For the Southeastern Power Administration, the Committee recommends $8,638,000, the same as the budget request. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHWESTERN POWER

ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $28,414,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 44,944,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 44,944,000 

For the Southwestern Power Administration, the Committee recommends $44,944,000, the same as the budget request. 

CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 

WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. 1 $228,346,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 256,711,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 256,711,000 

1 Includes emergency appropriations of $10,000,000 under Public Law 111–5. 

For the Western Area Power Administration, the Committee recommends $256,711,000, the same as the budget request. 

In this and subsequent fiscal years, the Committee recommends 

adopting the proposal presented in the President’s budget request 

to reclassify from mandatory to discretionary those power receipts 

associated with the repayment of Western’s annual expenses in 

this appropriations account. Such receipts will now be credited to 

this account as discretionary offsetting collections available for the 

sole purpose of funding the annual expenses of Program Direction 

and Operations and Maintenance (but excluding Purchase Power 

and Wheeling) of this account. This change does not convert this 

account into a revolving fund, since the Committee must specify a 

dollar limit on this activity in annual appropriations acts. For fiscal 

year 2010, the Committee recommends that no more than 

$147,530,000 be credited to this account for this purpose. 

The Committee directs the Western Area Power Administration 

to continue to collaborate with its firm power customers to develop 

annual work plans and accept funds advanced by customers to the 

extent such customers deem funds to be available, pursuant to its 

existing authorities. 

For fiscal year 2010, the Committee supports a total program 

level for this account of $899,317,000, which includes $104,971,000 

for Construction and Rehabilitation, $57,159,000 for Operations 

and Maintenance, $548,847,000 for Purchase Power and Wheeling, 

and $180,756,000 for Program Direction. The Committee recommends $7,584,000 for the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation. 
123 

Offsetting collections total $501,216,000, consisting of $147,530,000 for Western’s annual expenses, $349,807,000 for Purchase Power and Wheeling, and $3,879,000 from the Colorado 

River Dam Fund (as authorized in Public Law 98–381). 

FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $2,959,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 2,568,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,568,000 

The Falcon Dam and Amistad Dam on the Rio Grande River generate power through hydroelectric facilities and sell this power to 

public utilities through the Western Power Administration. This 

fund, created in the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Years 1994 and 1995, defrays the costs of operation, maintenance, 

and emergency activities and is administered by the Western Area 

Power Administration. For the Falcon and Amistad Operating and 

Maintenance Fund, the Committee recommends $2,568,000 the 

same as the request. 

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $273,400,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 298,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 298,000,000 

REVENUES APPLIED

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ¥$273,400,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... ¥298,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ¥298,000,000 
124 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D: 

Hydrogen Technology ................................................................................................................................................... 168,960 .......................... 190,000 ∂21,040 ∂190,000 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) .................................................................................................. 43,400 .......................... .......................... ¥43,400 ..........................

Fuel cell technologies .................................................................................................................................................. .......................... 68,213 .......................... .......................... ¥68,213 Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D ...................................................................................................................... 217,000 235,000 235,000 ∂18,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) .................................................................................................. 786,500 .......................... .......................... ¥786,500 ..........................

Solar energy ................................................................................................................................................................. 175,000 320,000 255,000 ∂80,000 ¥65,000 Wind energy ................................................................................................................................................................. 55,000 75,000 85,000 ∂30,000 ∂10,000 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) .................................................................................................. 118,000 .......................... .......................... ¥118,000 ..........................

Geothermal technology ................................................................................................................................................ 44,000 50,000 50,000 ∂6,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) .................................................................................................. 400,000 .......................... .......................... ¥400,000 ..........................

Water Power ................................................................................................................................................................. 40,000 30,000 60,000 ∂20,000 ∂30,000 Vehicle technologies .................................................................................................................................................... 273,238 333,302 323,302 ∂50,064 ¥10,000 Building technologies .................................................................................................................................................. 140,000 237,698 202,698 ∂62,698 ¥35,000 Industrial technologies ................................................................................................................................................ 90,000 100,000 100,000 ∂10,000 ..........................Federal energy management program ........................................................................................................................ 22,000 32,272 32,272 ∂10,272 ..........................RE-ENERGYSE (Regaining our energy science and engineering edge) ...................................................................... .......................... 115,000 .......................... .......................... ¥115,000 Facilities and infrastructure: 

National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL] ................................................................................................. 22,000 19,000 19,000 ¥3,000 ..........................Construction: 

10–EE–01 South table mountain ingress/egress and traffic capacity upgrades, National Renewable 

Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO ............................................................................................................. .......................... 44,000 44,000 ∂44,000 ..........................

08–EE–02 South-table mountain site infrastructure development, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO ............................................................................................................................... 13,000 .......................... .......................... ¥13,000 ..........................08–EE–01 Energy systems integration facility, National Renewal Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO ........ 41,000 .......................... .......................... ¥41,000 ..........................07–EE–01 Integrated Biorefinery research facility, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 

(emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5) ..................................................................................... 13,500 .......................... .......................... ¥13,500 ..........................
125 

06–EE–01 Research support facility project, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 

(emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5) ..................................................................................... 68,000 .......................... .......................... ¥68,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction ...................................................................................................................... 135,500 44,000 44,000 ¥91,500 ..........................

Subtotal, Facilities and infrastructure ................................................................................................. 157,500 63,000 63,000 ¥94,500 ..........................

Advanced battery manufacturing: 

Emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5 ..................................................................................................... 2,000,000 .......................... .......................... ¥2,000,000 ..........................

Alternative fueled vehicles pilot grant program: 

Emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5 ..................................................................................................... 300,000 .......................... .......................... ¥300,000 ..........................

Transportation electrification: 

Emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5 ..................................................................................................... 400,000 .......................... .......................... ¥400,000 ..........................

Energy efficient appliance rebate program: 

Emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5 ..................................................................................................... 300,000 .......................... .......................... ¥300,000 ..........................

Information and communication efficiency: 

Emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5 ..................................................................................................... 50,000 .......................... .......................... ¥50,000 ..........................

Program direction: 127,620 238,117 152,620 ∂25,000 ¥85,497 

Emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5 ..................................................................................................... 50,000 .......................... .......................... ¥50,000 ..........................

Program support: 18,157 120,000 72,000 ∂53,843 ¥48,000 

RDD&D ................................................................................................................................................................ 5,976,375 2,017,602 1,820,892 ¥4,155,483 ¥196,710 

Energy efficiency and conservation block grants—competitive (emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5) ............... 400,000 .......................... .......................... ¥400,000 ..........................Energy efficiency and conservation block grants—Subtitle E, title V, EISA (emergency appropriation Public Law 111– 

5) ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,800,000 .......................... .......................... ¥2,800,000 ..........................

Weatherization and intragovernmental: 

Weatherization: 

Weatherization assistance .................................................................................................................................. .......................... 220,000 200,000 ∂200,000 ¥20,000 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 4,900,000 .......................... .......................... ¥4,900,000 ..........................

Training and technical assistance .................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 100,000 .......................... .......................... ¥100,000 ..........................

Weatherization and technical assistance .......................................................................................................... 200,000 .......................... .......................... ¥200,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Weatherization ................................................................................................................................ 5,200,000 220,000 200,000 ¥5,000,000 ¥20,000 

Other: 

State energy program grants ............................................................................................................................. 50,000 75,000 50,000 .......................... ¥25,000 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 3,100,000 .......................... .......................... ¥3,100,000 ..........................

International renewable energy program ........................................................................................................... 5,000 .......................... .......................... ¥5,000 ..........................Tribal energy activities ....................................................................................................................................... 6,000 6,000 10,000 ∂4,000 ∂4,000 Renewable energy production incentive ............................................................................................................. 5,000 .......................... 5,000 .......................... ∂5,000 
126 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Asia pacific ........................................................................................................................................................ .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

Subtotal, Other ............................................................................................................................................... 3,166,000 81,000 65,000 ¥3,101,000 ¥16,000 Subtotal, Weatherization and intragovernmental .......................................................................................... 8,366,000 301,000 265,000 ¥8,101,000 ¥36,000 

Energy efficiency and renewable energy research and development [EERE R&D] (emergency appropriation Public Law 

111–5) ............................................................................................................................................................................. 970,600 .......................... .......................... ¥970,600 ..........................

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... ¥13,238 .......................... .......................... ∂13,238 ..........................Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 228,803 .......................... 148,075 ¥80,728 ∂148,075 Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110–329) ............................................................................................................... 250,000 .......................... .......................... ¥250,000 ..........................

TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY ......................................................................................... 18,978,540 2,318,602 2,233,967 ¥16,744,573 ¥84,635 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (1,928,540 ) (2,318,602 ) (2,233,967 ) (∂305,427 ) (¥84,635 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (17,050,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥17,050,000 ) ..........................

ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY 

Research and development: 

High temperature superconductivity R&D ................................................................................................................... 23,796 .......................... .......................... ¥23,796 ..........................Visiualization and controls .......................................................................................................................................... 24,373 .......................... .......................... ¥24,373 ..........................Energy storage and power electronics ........................................................................................................................ 6,552 .......................... .......................... ¥6,552 ..........................Renewable and distributed systems integration ........................................................................................................ 30,000 .......................... .......................... ¥30,000 ..........................Clean energy transmission and reliability .................................................................................................................. .......................... 42,000 42,000 ∂42,000 ..........................Smart grid research and development ....................................................................................................................... .......................... 67,000 32,000 ∂32,000 ¥35,000 Energy storage ............................................................................................................................................................. .......................... 15,000 15,000 ∂15,000 ..........................Cyber security for energy delivery systems ................................................................................................................. .......................... 50,000 50,000 ∂50,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Research and development ..................................................................................................................... 84,721 174,000 139,000 ∂54,279 ¥35,000 

Operations and analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 11,451 .......................... .......................... ¥11,451 ..........................Permitting, siting, and analysis .......................................................................................................................................... .......................... 6,400 6,400 ∂6,400 ..........................Infrastructure security and energy restoration .................................................................................................................... .......................... 6,188 6,188 ∂6,188 ..........................Program direction ................................................................................................................................................................. 21,180 21,420 21,420 ∂240 ..........................
127 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ........................................................................................................... 22,500 .......................... .......................... ¥22,500 ..........................Congressionally directed projects ............................................................................................................................... 19,648 .......................... 6,475 ¥13,173 ∂6,475 Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5): 

Smart grid investment program [EISA 1306] .................................................................................................... 3,375,700 .......................... .......................... ¥3,375,700 ..........................Smart grid regional and energy storage demos ................................................................................................ 700,000 .......................... .......................... ¥700,000 ..........................Workforce training .............................................................................................................................................. 100,000 .......................... .......................... ¥100,000 ..........................Interoperability standards and framework ......................................................................................................... 10,288 .......................... .......................... ¥10,288 ..........................Interconnection planning and analysis .............................................................................................................. 80,000 .......................... .......................... ¥80,000 ..........................Other recovery act .............................................................................................................................................. 211,512 .......................... .......................... ¥211,512 ..........................

TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY ............................................................................ 4,637,000 208,008 179,483 ¥4,457,517 ¥28,525 

Appropriations ....................................................................................................................................... (137,000 ) (208,008 ) (179,483 ) (∂42,483 ) (¥28,525 ) Emergency appropriations .................................................................................................................... (4,500,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥4,500,000 ) ..........................

NUCLEAR ENERGY 

Research and development: 

Integrated university program ..................................................................................................................................... 5,000 .......................... 5,000 .......................... ∂5,000 Nuclear power 2010 .................................................................................................................................................... 177,500 20,000 120,000 ¥57,500 ∂100,000 Generation IV nuclear energy systems ........................................................................................................................ 180,000 191,000 143,000 ¥37,000 ¥48,000 Nuclear hydrogen initiative ......................................................................................................................................... 7,500 .......................... .......................... ¥7,500 ..........................Advanced fuel cycle initiative ..................................................................................................................................... 145,000 .......................... .......................... ¥145,000 ..........................Fuel cycle research and development ......................................................................................................................... .......................... 192,000 145,000 ∂145,000 ¥47,000 

Subtotal, Research and development ..................................................................................................................... 515,000 403,000 413,000 ¥102,000 ∂10,000 

Infrastructure: 

Radiological facilities management: 

Space and defense infrastructure ..................................................................................................................... 35,000 47,000 47,000 ∂12,000 ..........................Research reactor infrastructure ......................................................................................................................... 6,146 .......................... 15,000 ∂3,854 ∂10,000 Oak Ridge nuclear infrastructure ...................................................................................................................... 12,500 .......................... .......................... ¥12,500 ..........................Los Alamos nuclear infrastructure ..................................................................................................................... 12,500 .......................... .......................... ¥12,500 ..........................PU-238 production restart project ..................................................................................................................... .......................... 30,000 .......................... ∂5,000 ¥25,000 

Subtotal, Radiological facilities management .............................................................................................. 66,146 77,000 62,000 ¥4,146 ¥15,000 

INL infrastructure: 

INL Operations and infrastructure ..................................................................................................................... 140,000 203,402 211,274 ∂71,274 ∂7,872 Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ............................................................................................................ 78,811 83,358 83,358 ∂4,547 ..........................

Subtotal, INL Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 284,957 363,760 356,632 ∂71,675 ¥7,128 
128 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Program direction ................................................................................................................................................................. 73,000 77,872 73,000 .......................... ¥4,872 Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... ¥5,000 .......................... .......................... ∂5,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Nuclear Energy ........................................................................................................................................ 867,957 844,632 842,632 ¥25,325 ¥2,000 

Funding from other defense activities ................................................................................................................................. ¥78,811 ¥83,358 ¥83,358 ¥4,547 ..........................Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 2,854 .......................... 2,000 ¥854 ∂2,000 

TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY ....................................................................................................................................... 792,000 761,274 761,274 ¥30,726 ..........................

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY 

Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009 ............................................................................................................ 149,000 .......................... .......................... ¥149,000 ..........................Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D [CCPI] ................................................................................................................................. ¥149,000 .......................... .......................... ∂149,000 ..........................

TOTAL, CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 

Clean coal power initiative .................................................................................................................................................. 288,174 .......................... .......................... ¥288,174 ..........................FutureGen ............................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Fuels and Power Systems: 

Innovations for existing plants ................................................................................................................................... 50,000 41,000 58,000 ∂8,000 ∂17,000 Advanced integrated gasification combined cycle ..................................................................................................... 65,236 55,000 65,000 ¥236 ∂10,000 Advanced turbines ....................................................................................................................................................... 28,000 31,000 32,000 ∂4,000 ∂1,000 Carbon sequestration .................................................................................................................................................. 150,000 179,865 160,200 ∂10,200 ¥19,665 Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5): 

Carbon capture and storage .............................................................................................................................. 1,000,000 .......................... .......................... ¥1,000,000 ..........................Geologic sequestration site characterization ..................................................................................................... 50,000 .......................... .......................... ¥50,000 ..........................Geologic sequestration training and research grant program .......................................................................... 20,000 .......................... .......................... ¥20,000 ..........................Clean coal power initiative round 3 .................................................................................................................. 800,000 .......................... .......................... ¥800,000 ..........................Carbon capture competitive solicitation ............................................................................................................ 1,520,000 .......................... .......................... ¥1,520,000 ..........................
129 

Fuels ............................................................................................................................................................................ 25,000 15,000 25,000 .......................... ∂10,000 Fuel cells ..................................................................................................................................................................... 58,000 54,000 58,000 .......................... ∂4,000 Advanced research ...................................................................................................................................................... 28,000 28,000 30,000 ∂2,000 ∂2,000 

Subtotal, Fuels and power systems ....................................................................................................................... 3,794,236 403,865 428,200 ¥3,366,036 ∂24,335 Subtotal, Coal ......................................................................................................................................................... 4,082,410 403,865 428,200 ¥3,654,210 ∂24,335 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (692,410 ) (403,865 ) (428,200 ) (¥264,210 ) (∂24,335 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (3,390,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥3,390,000 ) ..........................

Natural Gas Technologies .................................................................................................................................................... 20,000 25,000 25,000 ∂5,000 ..........................Petroleum—Oil Technologies ............................................................................................................................................... 5,000 .......................... 25,000 ∂20,000 ∂25,000 Program direction ................................................................................................................................................................. 152,000 158,000 158,000 ∂6,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ........................................................................................................... 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 ..........................

Plant and Capital Equipment .............................................................................................................................................. 18,000 20,000 20,000 ∂2,000 ..........................Fossil energy environmental restoration .............................................................................................................................. 9,700 10,000 10,000 ∂300 ..........................Special recruitment programs .............................................................................................................................................. 656 700 700 ∂44 ..........................Cooperative research and development ............................................................................................................................... 5,000 .......................... 5,000 .......................... ∂5,000 Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 43,864 .......................... 27,300 ¥16,564 ∂27,300 Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... ¥70,310 .......................... .......................... ∂70,310 ..........................

TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ 4,276,320 617,565 699,200 ¥3,577,120 ∂81,635 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (876,320 ) (617,565 ) (699,200 ) (¥177,120 ) (∂81,635 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (3,400,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥3,400,000 ) ..........................

NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES ................................................................................................................... 19,099 23,627 23,627 ∂4,528 ..........................STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE ........................................................................................................................................ 205,000 .......................... .......................... ¥205,000 ..........................

Storage facilities development .................................................................................................................................... .......................... 209,482 239,482 ∂239,482 ∂30,000 Management for SPR operations ................................................................................................................................ .......................... 19,591 19,591 ∂19,591 ..........................

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE .............................................................................................................. 205,000 229,073 259,073 ∂54,073 ∂30,000 

NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE ........................................................................................................................... 9,800 11,300 11,300 ∂1,500 ..........................ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION .............................................................................................................................. 110,595 133,058 110,595 .......................... ¥22,463 

NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP 

Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA) .................................................................................................................................... 10,755 7,652 7,652 ¥3,103 ..........................Operating expenses .............................................................................................................................................................. 48,296 104,444 104,444 ∂56,148 ..........................02–U–101, Depleted uranium hexafluoride conversion facility .......................................................................................... 33,000 .......................... .......................... ¥33,000 ..........................
130 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Total, Gaseous Diffusion Plants ............................................................................................................................. 81,296 104,444 104,444 ∂23,148 ..........................

Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion, 02–U–101 ...................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Small Sites: 

Argonne National Lab .................................................................................................................................................. 9,479 .......................... .......................... ¥9,479 ..........................

Transfer from Science ........................................................................................................................................ 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 ..........................Transfer from NNSA ............................................................................................................................................ 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 ..........................Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) .................................................................................................. 98,500 .......................... .......................... ¥98,500 ..........................

Subtotal, Argonne National Lab .................................................................................................................... 127,979 .......................... .......................... ¥127,979 ..........................

Brookhaven National Lab ............................................................................................................................................ 8,433 12,614 17,500 ∂9,067 ∂4,886 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) .................................................................................................. 42,355 .......................... .......................... ¥42,355 ..........................

Idaho National Lab ...................................................................................................................................................... 13,478 5,000 5,000 ¥8,478 ..........................Consolidated Business Center: 

California Site support ....................................................................................................................................... 187 262 262 ∂75 ..........................Stanford Linear Accelerator Center .................................................................................................................... 4,883 4,600 4,600 ¥283 ..........................

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 7,925 .......................... .......................... ¥7,925 ..........................

Energy Technology Engineering Center .............................................................................................................. 15,000 13,000 13,000 ¥2,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 54,175 .......................... .......................... ¥54,175 ..........................

Los Alamos National Lab ................................................................................................................................... 1,905 .......................... .......................... ¥1,905 ..........................

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 14,775 .......................... .......................... ¥14,775 ..........................

Moab ................................................................................................................................................................... 40,699 30,671 40,671 ¥28 ∂10,000 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 108,350 .......................... .......................... ¥108,350 ..........................

Tuba City ............................................................................................................................................................ 5,000 .......................... .......................... ¥5,000 ..........................Completed sites administration and support .................................................................................................... 1,100 1,200 1,200 ∂100 ..........................Oak Ridge National Laboratory (emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ............................................... 78,800 .......................... .......................... ¥78,800 ..........................

Subtotal, Consolidated Business Center ....................................................................................................... 332,799 49,733 59,733 ¥273,066 ∂10,000 

Funding from Science, NNSA ............................................................................................................................. ¥20,000 .......................... .......................... ∂20,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Small Sites ..................................................................................................................................... 505,044 67,347 82,233 ¥422,811 ∂14,886 
131 

West Valley Demonstration Project ...................................................................................................................................... 65,500 58,074 65,500 .......................... ∂7,426 

Emergency appropriation (Public Law 111–5) ........................................................................................................... 73,875 .......................... .......................... ¥73,875 ..........................

AARA Non-defense program direction (emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ....................................................... 2,415 .......................... .......................... ¥2,415 ..........................ARRA Non-defense unallocated (emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ................................................................ 1,830 .......................... .......................... ¥1,830 ..........................Use of Prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... ¥653 .......................... .......................... ∂653 ..........................Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 4,757 .......................... .......................... ¥4,757 ..........................

TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ................................................................................................. 744,819 237,517 259,829 ¥484,990 ∂22,312 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (261,819 ) (237,517 ) (259,829 ) (¥1,990 ) (∂22,312 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (483,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥483,000 ) ..........................

URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND 

Decontamination and decommissioning .............................................................................................................................. 525,503 559,377 588,322 ∂62,819 ∂28,945 Uranium/thorium reimbursement ......................................................................................................................................... 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5): 

Uranium/thorium reimbursement ....................................................................................................................... 68,950 .......................... .......................... ¥68,950 ..........................ARRA Oak Ridge ................................................................................................................................................. 118,200 .......................... .......................... ¥118,200 ..........................AARA Paducah .................................................................................................................................................... 78,800 .......................... .......................... ¥78,800 ..........................ARRA Portsmouth ............................................................................................................................................... 118,200 .......................... .......................... ¥118,200 ..........................ARRA program direction ..................................................................................................................................... 1,950 .......................... .......................... ¥1,950 ..........................ARRA unallocated ............................................................................................................................................... 3,900 .......................... .......................... ¥3,900 ..........................

Offsetting collections ........................................................................................................................................................... .......................... ¥200,000 .......................... .......................... ∂200,000 

TOTAL, UED&D FUND/URANIUM INVENTORY CLEANUP ........................................................................................... 925,503 359,377 588,322 ¥337,181 ∂228,945 

SCIENCE 

High energy physics: 

Proton accelerator-based physics ............................................................................................................................... 410,343 442,988 436,988 ∂26,645 ¥6,000 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 107,990 .......................... .......................... ¥107,990 ..........................

Electron accelerator-based physics ............................................................................................................................ 48,772 26,420 26,420 ¥22,352 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 1,400 .......................... .......................... ¥1,400 ..........................

Non-accelerator physics .............................................................................................................................................. 86,482 99,321 99,321 ∂12,839 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 4,445 .......................... .......................... ¥4,445 ..........................

Theoretical physics ...................................................................................................................................................... 63,036 67,240 67,240 ∂4,204 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 5,975 .......................... .......................... ¥5,975 ..........................

Advanced technology R&D .......................................................................................................................................... 187,093 183,031 183,031 ¥4,062 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 112,580 .......................... .......................... ¥112,580 ..........................

Total, High energy physics ............................................................................................................................ 1,028,116 819,000 813,000 ¥215,116 ¥6,000 
132 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Nuclear physics .................................................................................................................................................................... 481,019 530,000 518,000 ∂36,981 ¥12,000 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 89,800 .......................... .......................... ¥89,800 ..........................Construction: 

07–SC–02 Electron beam ion source Brookhaven National Laboratory, NY ..................................................... 2,438 .......................... .......................... ¥2,438 ..........................06–SC–01 Project engineering and design [PED] 12 GeV continuous electron beam accelerator facility upgrade, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator facility (was project 07–SC–001), Newport News, VA ....... 28,623 22,000 22,000 ¥6,623 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ........................................................................................... 65,000 .......................... .......................... ¥65,000 ..........................

Total, Nuclear physics .......................................................................................................................... 666,880 552,000 540,000 ¥126,880 ¥12,000 

Biological and environmental research: 

Biological research ...................................................................................................................................................... 423,613 .......................... .......................... ¥423,613 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 100,793 .......................... .......................... ¥100,793 ..........................

Climate change research ............................................................................................................................................ 177,927 .......................... .......................... ¥177,927 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 64,860 .......................... .......................... ¥64,860 ..........................

Biological systems science ......................................................................................................................................... .......................... 318,476 318,476 ∂318,476 ..........................Climate and environmental sciences .......................................................................................................................... .......................... 285,706 285,706 ∂285,706 ..........................

Total, Biological and environmental research ........................................................................................................ 767,193 604,182 604,182 ¥163,011 ..........................

Basic energy sciences: 

Research: 

Materials sciences and engineering research ................................................................................................... 1,129,391 381,112 1,172,903 ∂43,512 ∂791,791 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ........................................................................................... 236,798 .......................... .......................... ¥236,798 ..........................

Chemical sciences, geosciences, and energy: 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ........................................................................................... 154,062 .......................... .......................... ¥154,062 ..........................Biosciences ................................................................................................................................................ 297,113 338,357 326,357 ∂29,244 ¥12,000 

Scientific user facilities ..................................................................................................................................... .......................... 811,791 .......................... .......................... ¥811,791 

Subtotal, Research ......................................................................................................................................... 1,817,364 1,531,260 1,499,260 ¥318,104 ¥32,000 

Construction: 

08–SC–01 Advanced light source [ALS] user support building, LBNL, CA ...................................................... 11,500 .......................... .......................... ¥11,500 ..........................
133 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ........................................................................................... 14,546 .......................... .......................... ¥14,546 ..........................

08–SC–11 Photon ultrafast laser science and engineering [PULSE] building renovation, SLAC, CA ............. 3,728 .......................... .......................... ¥3,728 ..........................07–SC–06 Project engineering and design [PED]: 

National Synchrotron light source II [NSLS–II] ......................................................................................... 93,273 139,000 139,000 ∂45,727 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................. 150,000 .......................... .......................... ¥150,000 ..........................

05–R–320 LINAC coherent light source [LCLS] ................................................................................................. 36,967 15,240 15,240 ¥21,727 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction ................................................................................................................................... 310,014 154,240 154,240 ¥155,774 ..........................Total, Basic energy sciences ......................................................................................................................... 2,127,378 1,685,500 1,653,500 ¥473,878 ¥32,000 

Advanced scientific computing research ............................................................................................................................. 368,820 409,000 399,000 ∂30,180 ¥10,000 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 157,110 .......................... .......................... ¥157,110 ..........................

Fusion energy sciences program .......................................................................................................................................... 402,550 421,000 416,000 ∂13,450 ¥5,000 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 91,023 .......................... .......................... ¥91,023 ..........................

Science laboratories infrastructure: 

Laboratories facilities support: 

Infrastructure support: 

Payment in lieu of taxes ........................................................................................................................... 1,385 1,385 1,385 .......................... ..........................Excess facilities disposal .......................................................................................................................... 24,844 .......................... .......................... ¥24,844 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................. 14,301 .......................... .......................... ¥14,301 ..........................

Oak Ridge landlord ................................................................................................................................... 5,079 5,214 5,214 ∂135 ..........................General plant projects (emergency appropriations Public Law 111–5) ................................................... 89,572 .......................... .......................... ¥89,572 ..........................

Subtotal, Infrastructure support ........................................................................................................... 135,181 6,599 6,599 ¥128,582 ..........................

Construction: 

10–SC–70 Research support building and infrastructure modernization, SLAC ..................................... .......................... 8,900 8,900 ∂8,900 ..........................10–SC–71 Energy sciences building, ANL ................................................................................................ .......................... 10,000 10,000 ∂10,000 ..........................10–SC–72 Renovate science laboratory, Phase II, BNL ........................................................................... .......................... 7,000 7,000 ∂7,000 ..........................09–SC–72 Seismic life-safety, modernization and replacement of general purpose buildings Phase 

2, PED/Construction, LBNL ................................................................................................................... 12,495 34,027 34,027 ∂21,532 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................. 15,000 .......................... .......................... ¥15,000 ..........................

09–SC–73, Interdisciplinary science building Phase 1, PED, BNL .......................................................... 8,240 39,387 39,387 ∂31,147 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................. 18,673 .......................... .......................... ¥18,673 ..........................

09–SC–74, Technology and engineering development facilities PED, TJNAF .......................................... 3,700 27,687 27,687 ∂23,987 ..........................08–SC–71 Modernization of laboratory facilities PED, ORNL .................................................................. 25,103 .......................... .......................... ¥25,103 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................. 60,568 .......................... .......................... ¥60,568 ..........................

07–SC–05 Physical science facilities, PNNL ............................................................................................ 52,775 .......................... .......................... ¥52,775 ..........................
134 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

03–SC–001 Science laboratories infrastructure: 

MEL–001 Multiprogram energy laboratory infrastructure projects, various locations .................... 11,759 .......................... .......................... ¥11,759 ..........................Subtotal, Construction ...................................................................................................................... 208,313 127,001 127,001 ¥81,312 ..........................Total, Science laboratories infrastructure ........................................................................................ 343,494 133,600 133,600 ¥209,894 ..........................

Safeguards and security ...................................................................................................................................................... 80,603 83,000 83,000 ∂2,397 ..........................Science program direction: 

Headquarters ............................................................................................................................................................... 75,525 86,606 80,606 ∂5,081 ¥6,000 Office of Science and Technical Information ............................................................................................................. 8,916 8,916 8,916 .......................... ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 1,600 .......................... .......................... ¥1,600 ..........................

Field offices ................................................................................................................................................................. 102,254 118,200 105,200 ∂2,946 ¥13,000 

Total, Science program direction ............................................................................................................................ 188,295 213,722 194,722 ∂6,427 ¥19,000 

Workforce development for teachers and scientists ............................................................................................................ 13,583 20,678 20,678 ∂7,095 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 12,500 .......................... .......................... ¥12,500 ..........................

Advanced Research Projects Agency—Energy [ARPA–E] .................................................................................................... 15,000 .......................... .......................... ¥15,000 ..........................Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 93,687 .......................... 41,150 ¥52,537 ∂41,150 Small business innovation research [SBIR]: 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 19,004 .......................... .......................... ¥19,004 ..........................

Subtotal, SCIENCE .................................................................................................................................................. 6,375,236 4,941,682 4,898,832 ¥1,476,404 ¥42,850 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... ¥15,000 .......................... .......................... ∂15,000 ..........................Unallocated recovery act funding (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ............................................................. 12,400 .......................... .......................... ¥12,400 ..........................

TOTAL, SCIENCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 6,372,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 ¥1,473,804 ¥42,850 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (4,772,636 ) (4,941,682 ) (4,898,832 ) (∂126,196 ) (¥42,850 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (1,600,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥1,600,000 ) ..........................
135 

ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND 

Advanced research projects agency—Energy (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) .......................................... 398,000 .......................... .......................... ¥398,000 ..........................Program direction ................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 2,000 .......................... .......................... ¥2,000 ..........................

TOTAL, ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND ...................................................................................... 400,000 10,000 .......................... ¥400,000 ¥10,000 

NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL 

Repository program .............................................................................................................................................................. 68,552 28,400 28,400 ¥40,152 ..........................Program direction ................................................................................................................................................................. 74,983 70,000 70,000 ¥4,983 ..........................Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 1,855 .......................... .......................... ¥1,855 ..........................

TOTAL, NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL ........................................................................................................................ 145,390 98,400 98,400 ¥46,990 ..........................

TITLE 17—INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM 

Administrative operations .................................................................................................................................................... 19,880 43,000 43,000 ∂23,120 ..........................Offsetting collection ............................................................................................................................................................. ¥19,880 ¥43,000 ¥43,000 ¥23,120 ..........................Advance appropriation (Public Law 110–161) .................................................................................................................... 25,000 .......................... .......................... ¥25,000 ..........................Proposed change in subsidy cost ........................................................................................................................................ 440,000 1,500,000 .......................... ¥440,000 ¥1,500,000 Section 1705 Temporary loan guarantee program: 

Direct loan subsidy costs (Emergency appropriations, Public Law 111–5) .............................................................. 5,965,000 .......................... .......................... ¥5,965,000 ..........................Administrative expenses .............................................................................................................................................. .......................... 17,000 17,000 ∂17,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 35,000 .......................... .......................... ¥35,000 ..........................Administrative expenses, offsetting collections ................................................................................................. .......................... ¥17,000 ¥17,000 ¥17,000 ..........................

TOTAL, TITLE 17—INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM .......................................................... 6,465,000 1,500,000 .......................... ¥6,465,000 ¥1,500,000 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM 

Direct loan subsidy costs (Emergency appropriations Public Law 110–329) .................................................................... 7,510,000 .......................... .......................... ¥7,510,000 ..........................Administrative expenses ....................................................................................................................................................... .......................... 20,000 20,000 ∂20,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM ............................................................. 7,510,000 20,000 20,000 ¥7,490,000 ..........................

DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION 

Administrative operations: 

Salaries and expenses: 

Office of the Secretary ....................................................................................................................................... 5,700 5,864 6,864 ∂1,164 ∂1,000 
136 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Chief Financial Officer ....................................................................................................................................... 43,257 65,981 63,981 ∂20,724 ¥2,000 Management ....................................................................................................................................................... 67,790 88,456 78,456 ∂10,666 ¥10,000 Human capital management ............................................................................................................................. 31,436 29,537 29,537 ¥1,899 ..........................Chief Information Officer ................................................................................................................................... 53,738 38,146 38,146 ¥15,592 ..........................Congressional and intergovernmental affairs ................................................................................................... 4,700 7,326 5,826 ∂1,126 ¥1,500 Economic impact and diversity .......................................................................................................................... 3,545 3,896 3,896 ∂351 ..........................General Counsel ................................................................................................................................................. 31,233 32,478 32,478 ∂1,245 ..........................Policy and international affairs ......................................................................................................................... 19,469 19,296 19,296 ¥173 ..........................Public affairs ...................................................................................................................................................... 3,780 5,405 4,500 ∂720 ¥905 Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs .................................................................................................... 1,500 .......................... 5,500 ∂4,000 ∂5,500 

Subtotal, Salaries and expenses ................................................................................................................... 266,148 296,385 288,480 ∂22,332 ¥7,905 

Program support: 

Minority economic impact .................................................................................................................................. 855 2,775 2,775 ∂1,920 ..........................Policy analysis and system studies ................................................................................................................... 1,000 1,159 1,159 ∂159 ..........................Environmental policy studies ............................................................................................................................. 531 528 528 ¥3 ..........................Climate change technology program (prog. supp) ............................................................................................ 2,000 9,270 9,270 ∂7,270 ..........................Cybersecurity and secure communications ........................................................................................................ 34,512 33,365 33,365 ¥1,147 ..........................Corporate management information program ................................................................................................... 27,250 9,403 9,403 ¥17,847 ..........................Energy information technology services ............................................................................................................. .......................... 23,631 23,149 ∂23,149 ¥482 

Subtotal, Program support ............................................................................................................................ 66,148 80,131 79,649 ∂13,501 ¥482 Total, Administrative operations .................................................................................................................... 332,296 376,516 368,129 ∂35,833 ¥8,387 

Cost of work for others ............................................................................................................................................... 48,537 48,537 48,537 .......................... ..........................

SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................................................... 380,833 425,053 416,666 ∂35,833 ¥8,387 

Funding from other defense activities ................................................................................................................................. ¥108,190 ¥122,982 ¥122,982 ¥14,792 ..........................
137 

Total, Departmental administration (gross) ........................................................................................................... 272,643 302,071 293,684 ∂21,041 ¥8,387 

Miscellaneous revenues ........................................................................................................................................................ ¥117,317 ¥119,740 ¥119,740 ¥2,423 ..........................

TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net) ...................................................................................................... 155,326 182,331 173,944 ∂18,618 ¥8,387 

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL .......................................................................................................................................... 51,927 51,445 51,927 .......................... ∂482 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 15,000 .......................... .......................... ¥15,000 ..........................

ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES 

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

WEAPONS ACTIVITIES: 

Life extension program: 

B61 Life extension program ............................................................................................................................... 2,123 .......................... .......................... ¥2,123 ..........................W76 Life extension program .............................................................................................................................. 202,920 209,196 209,196 ∂6,276 ..........................

Total, Life extension program ........................................................................................................................ 205,043 209,196 209,196 ∂4,153 ..........................

Stockpile systems: 

B61 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 78,021 124,456 124,456 ∂46,435 ..........................W62 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 1,596 .......................... .......................... ¥1,596 ..........................W76 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 66,365 65,497 65,497 ¥868 ..........................W78 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 42,049 50,741 50,741 ∂8,692 ..........................W80 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 31,073 19,064 19,064 ¥12,009 ..........................B83 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 24,986 35,682 35,682 ∂10,696 ..........................W87 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 36,073 51,817 51,817 ∂15,744 ..........................W88 Stockpile systems ....................................................................................................................................... 48,358 43,043 43,043 ¥5,315 ..........................

Total, Stockpile systems ................................................................................................................................ 328,521 390,300 390,300 ∂61,779 ..........................

Reliable replacement warhead .................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Weapons dismantlement and disposition: 

Operations and maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 125,322 84,100 84,100 ¥41,222 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–32 ......................................................................................... 30,000 .......................... .......................... ¥30,000 ..........................

Construction: 

99–D–141 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS ........................................................................ 64,883 .......................... .......................... ¥64,883 ..........................

Total, Weapons dismantlement and disposition .................................................................................. 220,205 84,100 84,100 ¥136,105 ..........................
138 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Stockpile services: 

Production support ............................................................................................................................................. 293,062 301,484 301,484 ∂8,422 ..........................Research and development support .................................................................................................................. 35,144 37,071 37,071 ∂1,927 ..........................Research and development certification and safety ......................................................................................... 187,574 143,076 173,076 ¥14,498 ∂30,000 Management, technology, and production ......................................................................................................... 195,334 200,223 183,223 ¥12,111 ¥17,000 Pit manufacturing .............................................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Pit manufacturing capability ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Plutonium capability .......................................................................................................................................... 155,269 .......................... .......................... ¥155,269 ..........................Plutonium infrastructure sustainment ............................................................................................................... .......................... 149,201 149,201 ∂149,201 ..........................

Subtotal, Stockpile services ........................................................................................................................... 866,383 831,055 844,055 ¥22,328 ∂13,000 Total, Directed stockpile work ....................................................................................................................... 1,620,152 1,514,651 1,527,651 ¥92,501 ∂13,000 

Campaigns: 

Science campaign: 

Advanced certification, non-RRW .............................................................................................................. 19,400 19,400 19,400 .......................... ..........................Primary assessment technologies ............................................................................................................. 80,181 80,181 83,181 ∂3,000 ∂3,000 Dynamic plutonium experiments ............................................................................................................... 23,022 .......................... .......................... ¥23,022 ..........................Dynamic materials properties ................................................................................................................... 83,231 86,617 86,617 ∂3,386 ..........................Academic alliances ................................................................................................................................... .......................... 30,251 30,251 ∂30,251 ..........................Advanced radiography ............................................................................................................................... 28,535 22,328 22,328 ¥6,207 ..........................Secondary assessment technologies ......................................................................................................... 76,913 77,913 77,913 ∂1,000 ..........................Test readiness ........................................................................................................................................... 5,408 .......................... .......................... ¥5,408 ..........................

Subtotal, Science campaigns ........................................................................................................... 316,690 316,690 319,690 ∂3,000 ∂3,000 

Engineering campaign: 

Enhanced surety, non-RRW ....................................................................................................................... 46,112 42,000 42,000 ¥4,112 ..........................Weapons system engineering assessment technology ............................................................................. 16,592 18,000 18,000 ∂1,408 ..........................Nuclear survivability .................................................................................................................................. 21,100 21,000 21,000 ¥100 ..........................Enhanced surveillance .............................................................................................................................. 66,196 69,000 69,000 ∂2,804 ..........................
139 

Subtotal, Engineering campaign .......................................................................................................... 150,000 150,000 150,000 .......................... ..........................

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign: 

Ignition ...................................................................................................................................................... 100,535 106,734 106,734 ∂6,199 ..........................NIF diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support ............................................................................ 66,201 72,252 72,252 ∂6,051 ..........................Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion ................................................................................................ 8,652 5,000 5,000 ¥3,652 ..........................Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas ....................................................................... 3,053 4,000 4,000 ∂947 ..........................Facility operations and target production ................................................................................................ 203,282 248,929 265,429 ∂62,147 ∂16,500 Inertial fusion technology .......................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Naval Research Laboratory ....................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................NIF assembly and installation .................................................................................................................. 55,192 .......................... .......................... ¥55,192 ..........................

Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................. 436,915 436,915 453,415 ∂16,500 ∂16,500 Subtotal, Inertial confinement fusion ................................................................................................... 436,915 436,915 453,415 ∂16,500 ∂16,500 

Advanced simulation and computing ................................................................................................................ 556,125 556,125 566,125 ∂10,000 ∂10,000 Readiness campaign: 

Stockpile readiness ................................................................................................................................... 27,869 5,746 5,746 ¥22,123 ..........................High explosives and weapon operations ................................................................................................... 8,659 4,608 4,608 ¥4,051 ..........................Nonnuclear readiness ................................................................................................................................ 30,000 12,701 12,701 ¥17,299 ..........................Tritium readiness ...................................................................................................................................... 71,831 68,246 68,246 ¥3,585 ..........................Advanced design and production technologies ........................................................................................ 22,261 8,699 8,699 ¥13,562 ..........................

Subtotal, Readiness campaign ............................................................................................................. 160,620 100,000 100,000 ¥60,620 ..........................Total, Campaigns .................................................................................................................................. 1,620,350 1,559,730 1,589,230 ¥31,120 ∂29,500 

Readiness in technical base and facilities [RTBF]: 

Operations of facilities: 

Operations of facilities .............................................................................................................................. .......................... 1,342,303 .......................... .......................... ¥1,342,303 Kansas City Plant ...................................................................................................................................... 89,871 .......................... 156,056 ∂66,185 ∂156,056 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory .................................................................................................. 82,605 .......................... 86,670 ∂4,065 ∂86,670 Los Alamos National Laboratory ............................................................................................................... 289,169 .......................... 311,776 ∂22,607 ∂311,776 Nevada Test Site ....................................................................................................................................... 92,203 .......................... 79,583 ¥12,620 ∂79,583 Pantex ........................................................................................................................................................ 101,230 .......................... 131,602 ∂30,372 ∂131,602 Sandia national Laboratory ....................................................................................................................... 123,992 .......................... 104,133 ¥19,859 ∂104,133 Savannah River Site .................................................................................................................................. 92,762 .......................... 128,580 ∂35,818 ∂128,580 Y–12 Productions Plant ............................................................................................................................ 235,397 .......................... 210,774 ¥24,623 ∂210,774 Institutional Site Support .......................................................................................................................... 56,102 .......................... 120,129 ∂64,027 ∂120,129 
140 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Subtotal, operations of facilities .......................................................................................................... 1,163,331 1,342,303 1,329,303 ∂165,972 ¥13,000 

Program readiness ............................................................................................................................................. 71,626 73,021 73,021 ∂1,395 ..........................Material recycle and recovery ............................................................................................................................ 70,334 69,542 69,542 ¥792 ..........................Containers .......................................................................................................................................................... 22,696 23,392 23,392 ∂696 ..........................Storage ............................................................................................................................................................... 31,951 24,708 24,708 ¥7,243 ..........................

Subtotal, RTBF ............................................................................................................................................... 1,359,938 1,532,966 1,519,966 ∂160,028 ¥13,000 

Construction: 

10–D–501 Nuclear facilities risk reduction Y–12 National security complex, Oakridge, TN .................. .......................... 12,500 12,500 ∂12,500 ..........................99–D–141 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS ........................................................................ .......................... 30,321 30,321 ∂30,321 ..........................09–D–007, LANSCE Reinvestment PED Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM .............................. 19,300 .......................... 30,000 ∂10,700 ∂30,000 09–D–404, Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM ............ 3,104 .......................... 13,000 ∂9,896 ∂13,000 08–D–801 High pressure fire loop [HPFL], Pantex Plant, Amarillo, TX ................................................... 1,940 31,910 31,910 ∂29,970 ..........................08–D–802 High explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant, Amarillo, TX .................................................. 27,386 .......................... .......................... ¥27,386 ..........................08–D–804 TA–55 Reinvestment project, Los Alamos National Laboratory [LANL] .................................. 7,663 .......................... .......................... ¥7,663 ..........................08–D–806 Ion beam laboratory refurbishment, SNL Albuquerque, NM ................................................... 6,100 .......................... .......................... ¥6,100 ..........................07–D–140 Project engineering and design [PED], various locations ...................................................... 7,223 .......................... .......................... ¥7,223 ..........................07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL ...................................... 19,070 .......................... .......................... ¥19,070 ..........................06–D–140 Project engineering and design [PED], various locations ...................................................... 101,521 70,678 16,200 ¥85,321 ¥54,478 06–D–141 Project engineering and design [PED], Y–12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN .... .......................... .......................... 94,000 ∂94,000 ∂94,000 06–D–402 NTS replace fire stations 1 & 2 Nevada Test Site, NV .......................................................... 9,060 1,473 1,473 ¥7,587 ..........................05–D–402 Beryllium capability [BEC] project, Y–12 National security complex, Oak Ridge, TN ........... 4,865 .......................... .......................... ¥4,865 ..........................04–D–125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 

Los Alamos, NM .................................................................................................................................... 97,194 55,000 98,000 ∂806 ∂43,000 

04–D–128 TA–18 mission relocation project, Los Alamos Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM ........................ 10,042 1,500 1,500 ¥8,542 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction .......................................................................................................................... 314,468 203,382 328,904 ∂14,436 ∂125,522 Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities ............................................................................... 1,674,406 1,736,348 1,848,870 ∂174,464 ∂112,522 

Secure transportation asset: 

Operations and equipment ........................................................................................................................ 127,701 138,772 138,772 ∂11,071 ..........................
141 

Program direction ...................................................................................................................................... 86,738 96,143 96,143 ∂9,405 ..........................

Subtotal, Secure transportation asset .................................................................................................. 214,439 234,915 234,915 ∂20,476 ..........................

Nuclear weapons incident response ........................................................................................................................... 215,278 221,936 221,936 ∂6,658 ..........................Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization pgm: 79,550 144,959 144,959 ∂65,409 ..........................

Construction: 

08–D–601 Mercury highway, Nevada Test Site, NV ................................................................................. 11,349 .......................... .......................... ¥11,349 ..........................08–D–602 Portable water system upgrades Y–12 Plant, Oak Ridge, TN ............................................... 26,836 .......................... .......................... ¥26,836 ..........................07–D–253 TA 1 heating systems modernization [HSM] Sandia National Laboratory ............................. 15,282 9,963 9,963 ¥5,319 ..........................06–D–601 Electrical distribution system upgrade, Pantex Plant, Amarillo, TX ...................................... 3,880 .......................... .......................... ¥3,880 ..........................06–D–603 Steam plant life extension project [SLEP], Y–12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, 

TN .......................................................................................................................................................... 10,552 .......................... .......................... ¥10,552 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction ...................................................................................................................... 67,899 9,963 9,963 ¥57,936 ..........................Total, Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program ......................................................... 147,449 154,922 154,922 ∂7,473 ..........................

Site stewardship: 

Environmental projects and operations ............................................................................................................. .......................... 41,288 41,288 ∂41,288 ..........................Nuclear materials integration ............................................................................................................................ .......................... 20,000 20,000 ∂20,000 ..........................Stewardship planning ........................................................................................................................................ .......................... 29,086 .......................... .......................... ¥29,086 

Total, Site stewardship .................................................................................................................................. .......................... 90,374 61,288 ∂61,288 ¥29,086 

Environmental projects and operations: 

Long-term stewardship ...................................................................................................................................... 38,596 .......................... .......................... ¥38,596 ..........................

Transformation disposition .......................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Safeguards and security: 

Cybersecurity ...................................................................................................................................................... 121,286 122,511 122,511 ∂1,225 ..........................Defense nuclear security .................................................................................................................................... 689,510 700,044 700,044 ∂10,534 ..........................

Construction: 

10–D–701 Security improvements project Y–12 Plant, Oak Ridge, TN .......................................... .......................... 49,000 49,000 ∂49,000 ..........................08–D–701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project Los Almos National Laboratory ..................... 44,620 .......................... .......................... ¥44,620 ..........................05–D–170 Project engineering and design [PED], various locations ............................................. 1,078 .......................... .......................... ¥1,078 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction ................................................................................................................. 45,698 49,000 49,000 ∂3,302 ..........................Subtotal, Defense nuclear security .............................................................................................. 735,208 749,044 749,044 ∂13,836 ..........................Total, Safeguards and security ................................................................................................... 856,494 871,555 871,555 ∂15,061 ..........................
142 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Congressionally directed projects ............................................................................................................................... 22,836 .......................... .......................... ¥22,836 ..........................Use of prior year balances .......................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... ¥42,100 ¥42,100 ¥42,100 

TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................................. 6,410,000 6,384,431 6,468,267 ∂58,267 ∂83,836 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION 

Nonproliferation and verification, R&D ................................................................................................................................ 345,332 297,300 337,300 ¥8,032 ∂40,000 

Construction: 

07–SC–05 Physical Science Facility, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA ........................... 18,460 .......................... .......................... ¥18,460 ..........................

Subtotal, Nonproliferation & verification R&D .............................................................................................. 363,792 297,300 337,300 ¥26,492 ∂40,000 

Nonproliferation and international security ......................................................................................................................... 150,000 207,202 187,202 ∂37,202 ¥20,000 International nuclear materials protection and cooperation 400,000 552,300 552,300 ∂152,300 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–32 ........................................................................................................... 55,000 .......................... .......................... ¥55,000 ..........................

Elimination of weapons-grade plutonium production program ........................................................................................... 141,299 24,507 24,507 ¥116,792 ..........................Fissile materials disposition: 

U.S. plutonium disposition .......................................................................................................................................... 40,774 90,896 90,896 ∂50,122 ..........................U.S. uranium disposition ............................................................................................................................................. .......................... 34,691 34,691 ∂34,691 ..........................Supporting activities ................................................................................................................................................... .......................... 1,075 1,075 ∂1,075 ..........................Construction: 

MOX fuel fabrication facilities: 

99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC ..................................................... .......................... 504,238 504,238 ∂504,238 ..........................99–D–141–02 Waste solidification building, Savannah River, SC ......................................................... .......................... 70,000 70,000 ∂70,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction .......................................................................................................................... .......................... 574,238 574,238 ∂574,238 ..........................Subtotal, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposal ................................................................................ 40,774 700,900 700,900 ∂660,126 ..........................

Russian surplus materials disposition ....................................................................................................................... 1,000 1,000 1,000 .......................... ..........................
143 

Total, Fissile materials disposition ........................................................................................................................ 41,774 701,900 701,900 ∂660,126 ..........................

Global threat reduction initiative ......................................................................................................................................... 395,000 353,500 333,500 ¥61,500 ¥20,000 International nuclear fuel bank ........................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 1,903 .......................... .......................... ¥1,903 ..........................

Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ........................................................................................................... 1,548,768 2,136,709 2,136,709 ∂587,941 ..........................

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... ¥11,418 .......................... .......................... ∂11,418 ..........................

Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ........................................................................................................... 1,537,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 ∂599,359 ..........................TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION ..................................................................................................... 1,537,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 ∂599,359 ..........................

NAVAL REACTORS 

Naval reactors development ................................................................................................................................................. 771,600 935,533 905,533 ∂133,933 ¥30,000 Construction: 

10–D–093, Security upgrades, KAPL .......................................................................................................................... .......................... 1,500 1,500 ∂1,500 ..........................10–D–904, NRF infrastructure upgrades, Idaho ........................................................................................................ .......................... 700 700 ∂700 ..........................09–D–190, PED, Infrastructure upgrades, KAPL ........................................................................................................ 1,000 1,000 1,000 .......................... ..........................09–D–902, NRF Office Building #2, ECC upgrade, Idaho ......................................................................................... 8,300 6,400 6,400 ¥1,900 ..........................08–D–190 Project engineering and design, Expended Core Facility M–290 recovering discharge station, Naval 

Reactor Facility, ID ................................................................................................................................................. 300 9,500 9,500 ∂9,200 ..........................

07–D–190 Materials research technology complex [MRTC] ....................................................................................... 12,400 11,700 11,700 ¥700 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction ............................................................................................................................................ 22,000 30,800 30,800 ∂8,800 ..........................Total, Naval reactors development ......................................................................................................................... 793,600 966,333 936,333 ∂142,733 ¥30,000 

Program direction ................................................................................................................................................................. 34,454 36,800 36,800 ∂2,346 ..........................

TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS ........................................................................................................................................ 828,054 1,003,133 973,133 ∂145,079 ¥30,000 

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR 

Office of the Administrator .................................................................................................................................................. 415,878 431,074 431,074 ∂15,196 ..........................Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 23,312 .......................... .......................... ¥23,312 ..........................Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... .......................... ¥10,320 ¥10,320 ¥10,320 ..........................

TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR ................................................................................................................. 439,190 420,754 420,754 ¥18,436 ..........................
144 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................... 9,214,594 9,945,027 9,998,863 ∂784,269 ∂53,836 

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP 

Closure Sites: 

Closure sites administration ....................................................................................................................................... 13,209 8,225 8,225 ¥4,984 ..........................Fernald ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2,100 .......................... .......................... ¥2,100 ..........................Miamisburg .................................................................................................................................................................. 30,574 33,243 33,243 ∂2,669 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 19,700 .......................... .......................... ¥19,700 ..........................

Total, closure sites ........................................................................................................................................ 65,583 41,468 41,468 ¥24,115 ..........................

Hanford Site: 

Nuclear facility D&D, river corridor closure project .................................................................................................... 231,837 327,955 327,955 ∂96,118 ..........................Nuclear material stabilization & disposition PFP ....................................................................................................... 122,483 118,087 118,087 ¥4,396 ..........................SNF stabilization and disposition ............................................................................................................................... 122,171 55,325 95,325 ¥26,846 ∂40,000 

Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions ................................................................................................................ 476,491 501,367 541,367 ∂64,876 ∂40,000 

Nuclear facility D&D—remainder of Hanford ............................................................................................................. 89,903 70,250 70,250 ¥19,653 ..........................Richland community and regulatory support ............................................................................................................. 19,620 21,940 21,940 ∂2,320 ..........................Soil & water remediation—groundwater/vadose zone ............................................................................................... 182,532 176,766 229,766 ∂47,234 ∂53,000 Solid waste stabilization & disposition—200 area ................................................................................................... 198,430 132,757 159,757 ¥38,673 ∂27,000 

Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions ................................................................................................................ 490,485 401,713 481,713 ¥8,772 ∂80,000 

Emergency appropriations, Public Law 111–5: 

D&D river corridor .............................................................................................................................................. 442,265 .......................... .......................... ¥442,265 ..........................D&D remainder of Handford .............................................................................................................................. 740,120 .......................... .......................... ¥740,120 ..........................Soil and groundwater RL–100 ........................................................................................................................... 145,780 .......................... .......................... ¥145,780 ..........................Soil and groundwater RL–1041 ......................................................................................................................... 77,815 .......................... .......................... ¥77,815 ..........................TRU and solid waste .......................................................................................................................................... 228,520 .......................... .......................... ¥228,520 ..........................

Total, Hanford Site ......................................................................................................................................... 2,601,476 903,080 1,023,080 ¥1,578,396 ∂120,000 
145 

Idaho National Laboratory: 

SNF stabilization and disposition—2012 ................................................................................................................... 14,334 14,768 28,768 ∂14,434 ∂14,000 Solid waste stabilization and disposition ................................................................................................................... 191,237 137,000 137,000 ¥54,237 ..........................Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ..................................................................................... 46,025 95,800 132,800 ∂86,775 ∂37,000 06–D–401, Sodium bearing waste treatment project, ID .......................................................................................... 86,700 83,700 83,700 ¥3,000 ..........................Soil and water remediation—2012 ............................................................................................................................ 99,465 71,000 84,000 ¥15,465 ∂13,000 Nuclear facility D&D .................................................................................................................................................... 34,133 .......................... .......................... ¥34,133 ..........................Idaho community and regulatory support ................................................................................................................... 3,867 3,900 3,900 ∂33 ..........................

D&D (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ......................................................................................... 217,875 .......................... .......................... ¥217,875 ..........................TRU and solid waste (emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ............................................................... 130,000 .......................... .......................... ¥130,000 ..........................Soil and groundwater (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ............................................................. 120,000 .......................... .......................... ¥120,000 ..........................

Total, Idaho National Laboratory ................................................................................................................... 943,636 406,168 470,168 ¥473,468 ∂64,000 

NNSA: 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory .................................................................................................................... .......................... 910 910 ∂910 ..........................NNSA Service Center/SPRU .......................................................................................................................................... 19,443 17,938 17,938 ¥1,505 ..........................Nevada ......................................................................................................................................................................... 75,674 65,674 65,674 ¥10,000 ..........................Nevada soil and groundwater (Emergency appropriation Public Law 111–5) .......................................................... 44,325 .......................... .......................... ¥44,325 ..........................California site support ................................................................................................................................................ .......................... 238 238 ∂238 ..........................Sandia National Laboratories ...................................................................................................................................... 3,000 2,864 2,864 ¥136 ..........................Los Alamos National Laboratory ................................................................................................................................. 222,734 189,000 204,000 ¥18,734 ∂15,000 D&D acceleration (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ............................................................................. 118,200 .......................... .......................... ¥118,200 ..........................Soil and groundwater (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ...................................................................... 78,800 .......................... .......................... ¥78,800 ..........................SPRU recovery acct project (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) .............................................................. 31,775 .......................... .......................... ¥31,775 ..........................

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ................................................................................................................. 593,951 276,624 291,624 ¥302,327 ∂15,000 

Oak Ridge Reservation: 

Building 3019 .............................................................................................................................................................. 58,000 38,900 38,900 ¥19,100 ..........................Nuclear facility D&D ORNL .......................................................................................................................................... 64,825 38,900 38,900 ¥25,925 ..........................Nuclear facility D&D Y–12 .......................................................................................................................................... 48,392 34,000 34,000 ¥14,392 ..........................Nuclear facility D&D, E. Tenn. Technology Park ......................................................................................................... 105 100 100 ¥5 ..........................OR reservation community & regulatory support ....................................................................................................... 6,100 6,253 6,253 ∂153 ..........................Soil and water remediation—offsites ........................................................................................................................ 1,230 .......................... .......................... ¥1,230 ..........................Solid waste stabilization and disposition—2012 ...................................................................................................... 84,183 35,615 35,615 ¥48,568 ..........................Emergency appropriations, Public Law 111–5: 

D&D Y–12 footprint reduction ........................................................................................................................... 327,000 .......................... .......................... ¥327,000 ..........................D7D ORNL footprint reduction ............................................................................................................................ 151,110 .......................... .......................... ¥151,110 ..........................TRU and solid waste .......................................................................................................................................... 80,000 .......................... .......................... ¥80,000 ..........................
146 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation ........................................................................................................................ 820,945 153,768 153,768 ¥667,177 ..........................

Office of River Protection: 

Waste treatment & immobilization plant: 

01–D–16A Low activity waste facility ............................................................................................................... 160,000 100,000 100,000 ¥60,000 ..........................01–D–16B Analytical laboratory ........................................................................................................................ 65,000 55,000 55,000 ¥10,000 ..........................01–D–16C Balance of facilities ........................................................................................................................ 75,000 50,000 50,000 ¥25,000 ..........................01–D–16D High-level waste facility .................................................................................................................. 125,000 160,000 160,000 ∂35,000 ..........................01–D–16E Pretreatment facility ........................................................................................................................ 265,000 325,000 325,000 ∂60,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Waste treatment and immobilization plant ................................................................................... 690,000 690,000 690,000 .......................... ..........................

Tank Farm activities: 

Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition .................................................................................................. 319,943 408,000 408,000 ∂88,057 ..........................Tank infrastructure (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ................................................................. 326,035 .......................... .......................... ¥326,035 ..........................

Subtotal, Tank Farm activities ...................................................................................................................... 645,978 408,000 408,000 ¥237,978 ..........................Total, Office of River Protection .................................................................................................................... 1,335,978 1,098,000 1,098,000 ¥237,978 ..........................

Savannah River site: 

Nuclear material stabilization and disposition: 

Nuclear material stabilization and disposition ................................................................................................. .......................... 385,310 385,310 ∂385,310 ..........................Construction: 

08–D–414 Project engineering and design plutonium preparation facility, VL ...................................... .......................... 6,315 6,315 ∂6,315 ..........................

Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions .............................................................................................. .......................... 391,625 391,625 ∂391,625 ..........................

SR community and regulatory support ....................................................................................................................... 14,800 18,300 18,300 ∂3,500 ..........................Nuclear material stabilization and disposition .......................................................................................................... 339,843 .......................... .......................... ¥339,843 ..........................Spent nuclear fuel stabilization and disposition ....................................................................................................... 24,108 38,768 38,768 ∂14,660 ..........................Solid waste stabilization and disposition ................................................................................................................... 62,599 .......................... .......................... ¥62,599 ..........................Soil and water remediation ......................................................................................................................................... 71,967 .......................... 33,025 ¥38,942 ∂33,025 
147 

Nuclear facility D&D .................................................................................................................................................... 12,052 .......................... .......................... ¥12,052 ..........................

Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions ................................................................................................................ 525,369 57,068 90,093 ¥435,276 ∂33,025 

Tank Farm activities: 

Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition .................................................................................................. 546,250 527,138 527,138 ¥19,112 ..........................05–D–405, Salt waste processing facility ........................................................................................................ 155,524 234,118 234,118 ∂78,594 ..........................

Subtotal, Tank farm activities ....................................................................................................................... 701,774 761,256 761,256 ∂59,482 ..........................

Emergency appropriations, Public Law 111–5: 

D&D P and R area ............................................................................................................................................. 579,000 .......................... .......................... ¥579,000 ..........................D&D M and D area ............................................................................................................................................ 130,000 .......................... .......................... ¥130,000 ..........................D&D soil and groundwater sitewide .................................................................................................................. 365,400 .......................... .......................... ¥365,400 ..........................TRU and solid waste .......................................................................................................................................... 541,000 .......................... .......................... ¥541,000 ..........................

Total, Savannah River site ............................................................................................................................ 2,842,543 1,209,949 1,242,974 ¥1,599,569 ∂33,025 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: 

Operate WIPP ............................................................................................................................................................... 137,425 144,902 159,902 ∂22,477 ∂15,000 

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 .................................................................................................... 172,375 .......................... .......................... ¥172,375 ..........................

Central Characterization Project ................................................................................................................................. 38,206 13,730 13,730 ¥24,476 ..........................Transportation ............................................................................................................................................................. 28,170 33,851 33,851 ∂5,681 ..........................Community and regulatory support ............................................................................................................................ 27,860 27,854 27,854 ¥6 ..........................

Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant ........................................................................................................................... 404,036 220,337 235,337 ¥168,699 ∂15,000 

Program direction ................................................................................................................................................................. 309,807 355,000 355,000 ∂45,193 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ............................................................................................................. 25,635 .......................... .......................... ¥25,635 ..........................

Program support ................................................................................................................................................................... 33,930 34,000 34,000 ∂70 ..........................Safeguards and Security: 

Waste Isolation Pilot Project ....................................................................................................................................... 5,124 4,644 4,644 ¥480 ..........................Oak Ridge Reservation ................................................................................................................................................ 27,020 32,400 32,400 ∂5,380 ..........................West Valley .................................................................................................................................................................. 1,400 1,859 1,859 ∂459 ..........................Paducah ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8,196 8,190 8,190 ¥6 ..........................Richland/Hanford Site ................................................................................................................................................. 79,765 82,771 82,771 ∂3,006 ..........................Savannah River Site .................................................................................................................................................... 134,336 132,064 149,064 ∂14,728 ∂17,000 Portsmouth .................................................................................................................................................................. 4,500 17,509 17,509 ∂13,009 ..........................

Total, Safeguards and Security .............................................................................................................................. 260,341 279,437 296,437 ∂36,096 ∂17,000 

Technology development ....................................................................................................................................................... 32,320 55,000 55,000 ∂22,680 ..........................
148 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution ....................................................................................................................... 463,000 463,000 463,000 .......................... ..........................ARRA defense unallocated (Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5) ........................................................................ 34,270 .......................... .......................... ¥34,270 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP .................................................................................................. 10,767,451 5,495,831 5,759,856 ¥5,007,595 ∂264,025 

Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 17,908 .......................... 4,000 ¥13,908 ∂4,000 Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................................................... ¥1,109 .......................... .......................... ∂1,109 ..........................

TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP ........................................................................................................ 10,784,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 ¥5,020,394 ∂268,025 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (5,657,250 ) (5,495,831 ) (5,763,856 ) (∂106,606 ) (∂268,025 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (5,127,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥5,127,000 ) ..........................

OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES 

Health, safety and security: 

Health, safety and security ......................................................................................................................................... 346,874 337,757 337,757 ¥9,117 ..........................Program direction ........................................................................................................................................................ 99,597 112,125 112,125 ∂12,528 ..........................

Total, Health, safety and security .......................................................................................................................... 446,471 449,882 449,882 ∂3,411 ..........................

Office of Legacy Management: 

Legacy management ................................................................................................................................................... 174,397 177,618 177,618 ∂3,221 ..........................Program direction ........................................................................................................................................................ 11,584 12,184 12,184 ∂600 ..........................

Total, Office of Legacy Management ...................................................................................................................... 185,981 189,802 189,802 ∂3,821 ..........................

Nuclear energy: 

Infrastructure: 

Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ............................................................................................................ 78,811 .......................... .......................... ¥78,811 ..........................INL infrastructure O&M ...................................................................................................................................... .......................... 83,358 83,358 ∂83,358 ..........................

Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility: 

Operations and maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 19,200 .......................... .......................... ¥19,200 ..........................
149 

Construction and other project costs: 

99–D–143 MOX fuel fabrication facility ................................................................................................... 467,808 .......................... .......................... ¥467,808 ..........................

Subtotal, Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility ..................................................................................... 487,008 .......................... .......................... ¥487,008 ..........................Total, Nuclear energy ............................................................................................................................ 565,819 83,358 83,358 ¥482,461 ..........................

Defense-related administrative support .............................................................................................................................. 108,190 122,982 122,982 ∂14,792 ..........................Office of Hearings and Appeals ........................................................................................................................................... 6,603 6,444 6,444 ¥159 ..........................

Subtotal, Other Defense Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1,313,064 852,468 852,468 ¥460,596 ..........................

Congressionally directed projects ........................................................................................................................................ 999 .......................... 2,000 ∂1,001 ∂2,000 

TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................................... 1,314,063 852,468 854,468 ¥459,595 ∂2,000 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL .................................................................................................................................. 143,000 98,400 98,400 ¥44,600 ..........................

TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................ 21,455,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 ¥4,740,320 ∂323,861 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (16,243,907 ) (16,391,726 ) (16,715,587 ) (∂471,680 ) (∂323,861 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (5,212,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥5,212,000 ) ..........................

POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS 

SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION 

Operation and maintenance: 

Purchase power and wheeling .................................................................................................................................... 63,522 85,228 85,228 ∂21,706 ..........................Program direction ........................................................................................................................................................ 7,420 7,638 7,638 ∂218 ..........................

Subtotal, Operation and maintenance ................................................................................................................... 70,942 92,866 92,866 ∂21,924 ..........................

Less alternative financing [PPW] ................................................................................................................................ ¥14,002 ¥14,422 ¥14,422 ¥420 ..........................Offsetting collections .................................................................................................................................................. ¥49,520 ¥78,444 ¥78,444 ¥28,924 ..........................Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts ..................................................................................................... .......................... 7,638 7,638 ∂7,638 ..........................Spending in excess of receipts (proposal) ................................................................................................................. .......................... 1,000 1,000 ∂1,000 ..........................

TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................. 7,420 8,638 8,638 ∂1,218 ..........................
150 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION 

Operation and maintenance: 

Operating expenses ..................................................................................................................................................... 12,865 12,775 12,775 ¥90 ..........................Purchase power and wheeling .................................................................................................................................... 46,000 48,000 48,000 ∂2,000 ..........................Program direction ........................................................................................................................................................ 24,330 28,153 28,153 ∂3,823 ..........................Construction ................................................................................................................................................................ 5,991 6,016 6,016 ∂25 ..........................

Subtotal, Operation and maintenance ................................................................................................................... 89,186 94,944 94,944 ∂5,758 ..........................

Less alternative financing (for program direction) .................................................................................................... ¥2,200 .......................... .......................... ∂2,200 ..........................Less alternative financing (ofr O&M) ......................................................................................................................... ¥9,381 .......................... .......................... ∂9,381 ..........................Less alternative financing [PPW] ................................................................................................................................ ¥11,000 .......................... .......................... ∂11,000 ..........................Less alternative financing (Const.) ............................................................................................................................ ¥3,191 .......................... .......................... ∂3,191 ..........................Less alternative financing .......................................................................................................................................... .......................... ¥12,000 ¥12,000 ¥12,000 ..........................Offsetting collections .................................................................................................................................................. ¥35,000 ¥69,868 ¥69,868 ¥34,868 ..........................Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts ..................................................................................................... .......................... 31,868 31,868 ∂31,868 ..........................

TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................. 28,414 44,944 44,944 ∂16,530 ..........................

WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION 

Operation and maintenance: 

Construction and rehabilitation ......................................................................................................................... 74,544 104,971 104,971 ∂30,427 ..........................Operation and maintenance ............................................................................................................................... 52,365 57,159 57,159 ∂4,794 ..........................

Emergency appropriation, Public Law 111–5 ........................................................................................... 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 ..........................

Purchase power and wheeling ........................................................................................................................... 600,960 548,847 548,847 ¥52,113 ..........................Program direction ............................................................................................................................................... 166,423 180,756 180,756 ∂14,333 ..........................Utah mitigation and conservation ..................................................................................................................... 7,342 7,584 7,584 ∂242 ..........................

Subtotal, Operation and maintenance .......................................................................................................... 911,634 899,317 899,317 ¥12,317 ..........................

Less alternative financing (for O&M) ......................................................................................................................... ¥15,499 .......................... .......................... ∂15,499 ..........................Less alternative financing (for Const.) ....................................................................................................................... ¥47,663 .......................... .......................... ∂47,663 ..........................
151 

Less alternative financing (for Program direction) .................................................................................................... ¥15,800 .......................... .......................... ∂15,800 ..........................Less alternative financing (for PPW) .......................................................................................................................... ¥197,842 .......................... .......................... ∂197,842 ..........................Less alternative financing .......................................................................................................................................... .......................... ¥288,920 ¥288,920 ¥288,920 ..........................Offsetting collections (Public Law 108–477, Public Law 109–103) ......................................................................... ¥403,118 ¥349,807 ¥349,807 ∂53,311 ..........................Offsetting collections (Public Law 98–381) ............................................................................................................... ¥3,366 ¥3,879 ¥3,879 ¥513 ..........................Offsetting collections (for program direction) ............................................................................................................ .......................... ¥110,492 ¥110,492 ¥110,492 ..........................Offsetting collections (for O&M) ................................................................................................................................. .......................... ¥37,038 ¥37,038 ¥37,038 ..........................Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts ..................................................................................................... .......................... 147,530 147,530 ∂147,530 ..........................

TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................. 228,346 256,711 256,711 ∂28,365 ..........................

FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND 

Operation and maintenance ................................................................................................................................................. 2,959 2,568 2,568 ¥391 ..........................Offsetting collections ........................................................................................................................................................... .......................... ¥2,348 ¥2,348 ¥2,348 ..........................Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts .............................................................................................................. .......................... 2,348 2,348 ∂2,348 ..........................

TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS ....................................................................................................... 267,139 312,861 312,861 ∂45,722 ..........................

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ............................................................................................................................... 273,400 298,000 298,000 ∂24,600 ..........................FERC revenues ...................................................................................................................................................................... ¥273,400 ¥298,000 ¥298,000 ¥24,600 ..........................

GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ............................................................................................................... 73,537,001 28,407,846 27,398,221 ¥46,138,780 ¥1,009,625 

(Total amount appropriated) ......................................................................................................................... (26,793,001 ) (28,407,846 ) (27,398,221 ) (∂605,220 ) (¥1,009,625 ) (Emergency appropriations) ........................................................................................................................... (46,570,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥46,570,000 ) ..........................(Rescissions, including emergency funding) ................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................(Deferrals) ...................................................................................................................................................... (149,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥149,000 ) ..........................(Advance appropriation) ................................................................................................................................ (25,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥25,000 ) ..........................

SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTS 

Energy efficiency and renewable energy .............................................................................................................................. 18,978,540 2,318,602 2,232,967 ¥16,745,573 ¥85,635 Electricity delivery and energy reliability ............................................................................................................................. 4,637,000 208,008 179,483 ¥4,457,517 ¥28,525 Nuclear energy ...................................................................................................................................................................... 792,000 761,274 761,274 ¥30,726 ..........................Fossil Energy Research and Development ........................................................................................................................... 4,276,320 617,565 700,200 ¥3,576,120 ∂82,635 Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves ................................................................................................................................ 19,099 23,627 23,627 ∂4,528 ..........................Strategic petroleum reserves ............................................................................................................................................... 205,000 229,073 259,073 ∂54,073 ∂30,000 Northeast home heating oil reserve ..................................................................................................................................... 9,800 11,300 11,300 ∂1,500 ..........................Energy Information Administration ...................................................................................................................................... 110,595 133,058 110,595 .......................... ¥22,463 
152 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Enacted Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation compared 

to— 

Enacted Budget estimate 

Non-defense environmental clean up .................................................................................................................................. 744,819 237,517 259,829 ¥484,990 ∂22,312 Uranium enrichment D&D fund ........................................................................................................................................... 925,503 359,377 588,322 ¥337,181 ∂228,945 Science ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6,372,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 ¥1,473,804 ¥42,850 Energy transformation acceleration fund ............................................................................................................................ 400,000 10,000 .......................... ¥400,000 ¥10,000 Nuclear waste disposal ........................................................................................................................................................ 145,390 98,400 98,400 ¥46,990 ..........................Innovative technology loan guarantee program .................................................................................................................. 6,465,000 1,500,000 .......................... ¥6,465,000 ¥1,500,000 Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loan pgm .................................................................................................... 7,510,000 20,000 20,000 ¥7,490,000 ..........................Departmental administration ............................................................................................................................................... 272,643 302,071 293,684 ∂21,041 ¥8,387 

Revenues ..................................................................................................................................................................... ¥117,317 ¥119,740 ¥119,740 ¥2,423 ..........................

Total, Departmental administration ....................................................................................................................... 155,326 182,331 173,944 ∂18,618 ¥8,387 

Office of the Inspector General ............................................................................................................................................ 66,927 51,445 51,927 ¥15,000 ∂482 Atomic energy defense activities: 

National Nuclear Security Administration: 

Weapons activities ............................................................................................................................................. 6,410,000 6,384,431 6,468,267 ∂58,267 ∂83,836 Defense nuclear nonproliferation ....................................................................................................................... 1,537,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 ∂599,359 ..........................Naval reactors .................................................................................................................................................... 828,054 1,003,133 973,133 ∂145,079 ¥30,000 Office of the Administrator ................................................................................................................................ 439,190 420,754 420,754 ¥18,436 ..........................

Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration ...................................................................................... 9,214,594 9,945,027 9,998,863 ∂784,269 ∂53,836 

Defense environmental cleanup .................................................................................................................................. 10,784,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 ¥5,020,394 ∂268,025 Other defense activities .............................................................................................................................................. 1,314,063 852,468 854,468 ¥459,595 ∂2,000 Defense nuclear waste disposal ................................................................................................................................. 143,000 98,400 98,400 ¥44,600 ..........................

Total, Atomic energy defense activities ................................................................................................................. 21,455,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 ¥4,740,320 ∂323,861 

Power marketing administrations: 

Southeastern Power Administration ............................................................................................................................ 7,420 8,638 8,638 ∂1,218 ..........................Southwestern Power Administration ............................................................................................................................ 28,414 44,944 44,944 ∂16,530 ..........................Western Area Power Administration ............................................................................................................................ 228,346 256,711 256,711 ∂28,365 ..........................
153 

Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund ............................................................................................. 2,959 2,568 2,568 ¥391 ..........................

Total, Power marketing administrations ................................................................................................................ 267,139 312,861 312,861 ∂45,722 ..........................

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: 

Salaries and expenses ................................................................................................................................................ 273,400 298,000 298,000 ∂24,600 ..........................Revenues ..................................................................................................................................................................... ¥273,400 ¥298,000 ¥298,000 ¥24,600 ..........................

Total Summary of Accounts, Department of Energy .............................................................................................. 73,537,001 28,407,846 27,398,221 ¥46,138,780 ¥1,009,625 

FUNCTION RECAP: 

NON-DEFENSE .............................................................................................................................................................. 52,166,094 12,016,120 10,682,634 ¥41,483,460 ¥1,333,486 DEFENSE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21,370,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 ¥4,655,320 ∂323,861 

Environmental management ................................................................................................................................................ (12,454,572 ) (6,092,725 ) (6,612,007 ) (¥5,842,565 ) (∂519,282 ) 

DEFENSE RELATED ....................................................................................................................................................... (10,784,250 ) (5,495,831 ) (5,763,856 ) (¥5,020,394 ) (∂268,025 ) NON-DEFENSE .............................................................................................................................................................. (1,670,322 ) (596,894 ) (848,151 ) (¥822,171 ) (∂251,257 ) 

Nuclear waste disposal ........................................................................................................................................................ (288,390 ) (196,800 ) (196,800 ) (¥91,590 ) ..........................

DEFENSE RELATED ....................................................................................................................................................... (143,000 ) (98,400 ) (98,400 ) (¥44,600 ) ..........................NON-DEFENSE .............................................................................................................................................................. (145,390 ) (98,400 ) (98,400 ) (¥46,990 ) ..........................
154 

GENERAL PROVISIONS—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

The following list of general provisions is recommended by the 

Committee. The recommendation includes several provisions which 

have been included in previous Energy and Water Appropriations 

Acts and new provisions as follows: 

Section 301. Language is included under section 302, which prohibits the use of funds in this act to initiate a request for proposal 

of expression of interest for new programs which have not yet been 

presented to Congress in the annual budget submission and which 

have not yet been approved and funded by Congress. 

Section 302. Language is included to address issues under section 3161 of Public Law 102–484. 

Section 303. Language is included which permits the transfer 

and merger of unexpended balances of prior appropriations with 

appropriation accounts established in this bill. 

Section 304. Language is included that prohibits the use of funds 

by the Bonneville Power Administration to enter into energy efficiency contracts outside its service area. 

Section 305. This section establishes certain notice and competition requirements for Department of Energy user facilities. 

Section 306. Language is included specifically authorizing intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year 2008 Intelligence Authorization Act. 

Section 307. Language included related to laboratory directed research and development. 

Section 308. Language is included regarding transfer authority. 

Section 309. The Committee has included a provision related to 

the Bonneville Power Administration Treasury account. 

Section 310. The Committee has included a provision related to 

notification of funding awards. 

Section 311. The Committee has included a provision related to 

pensions. 
(155) 

TITLE IV 

INDEPENDENT AGENCIES 

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $75,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 76,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 76,000,000 

Established in 1965, the Appalachian Regional Commission is an 

economic development agency composed of 13 Appalachian States 

and a Federal co-chair appointed by the President. For fiscal year 

2010, the Committee recommends $76,000,000 for the ARC. 

The Committee recognizes the importance of trade and investment opportunities to the Appalachian Region and is encouraged 

by the findings in a report that Appalachian firms could find significant trade and investment opportunities, particularly in the energy, high technology, and transportation sectors in the Republic of 

Turkey and the surrounding region. In this regard, the Committee 

supports the Appalachian-Turkish Trade Project [ATTP], a project 

to promote opportunities to expand trade, encourage business interests, stimulate foreign studies, and to build a lasting and mutually 

meaningful relationship between Appalachian States and the Republic of Turkey, as well as the neighboring regions, such as 

Greece. The Committee commends the ARC for its leadership role 

in helping to implement the mission of the ATTP. The Committee 

expects the ARC to continue to be a prominent ATTP sponsor. 

The Committee has included no earmarks in the ARC funds. The 

Commission allocates its funds by formula to its member States, 

based primarily on need. Under the Commission’s formula system, 

earmarks out of ARC’s base funding could come at the expense of 

those States that have no earmarks. Accordingly, the Committee 

directs that any earmarks in any State be taken from within that 

State’s regular ARC allocation. 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $25,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 26,086,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 26,086,000 

For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $26,086,000, 

the same as the President’s request, for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board [DNFSB]. This Board is responsible for evaluating the implementation of standards for design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Department of Energy’s defense nuclear facilities. Based on these evaluations, the Board 

makes specific recommendations to the Secretary of Energy to en-
156 

sure that both public and employee heath and safety are protected. 

The Committee encourages the DNFSB to undertake the responsibility to provide cost estimates to accompany their recommendations. 

DELTA REGIONAL AUTHORITY

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $13,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 13,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 13,000,000 

For the Delta Regional Authority, the Committee recommends $13,000,000. The Delta Regional Authority was established to assist the eight State Mississippi Delta Region in obtaining basic infrastructure, transportation, skills training, and opportunities for 

economic development. 

DENALI COMMISSION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $11,800,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 11,965,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 11,965,000 

The Denali Commission is a Federal-State partnership responsible for promoting infrastructure development, job training, and 

other economic development services in rural areas throughout 

Alaska. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends 

$11,965,000. 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $1,034,656,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 1,061,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,061,000,000 

REVENUES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ¥$860,857,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... ¥878,102,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ¥902,402,000 

NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $173,799,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 182,898,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 158,598,000 

The Committee recommendation for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for fiscal year 2010 is $1,061,000,000. This amount is 

offset by estimated revenues of $902,402,000 resulting in a net appropriation of $158,598,000. The Committee has provided 

$15,000,000 to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support its 

participation in an Integrated University Program as directed by 

section 313 of Public Law 111–8. The Committee recommends 

$10,000,000 of this amount to be used to support university education programs relevant to the NRC mission. In addition, not less 

than $5,000,000 of this amount will be used for grants to support 

research projects that do not align with programmatic missions but 

are critical to maintaining the discipline of nuclear science and engineering. The Committee expects the Commission to utilize a por-
157 

tion of existing carryover balances to support license application reviews of any new reactor designs, including modular reactors. 

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $10,860,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 10,102,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 10,860,000 

REVENUES

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ¥$9,774,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... ¥9,092,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ¥9,774,000 

NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $1,086,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 1,010,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,086,000 

The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $1,086,000, 

an increase of $76,000 over the budget request. The Committee recommends that the current no year funding authority of the Office 

of Inspector General be retained. 

NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. $3,811,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 3,891,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 3,891,000 

The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established to 

evaluate the scientific and technical validity of the Department of 

Energy’s nuclear waste disposal program. The Board reports its 

findings no fewer than two times a year to Congress and to the 

Secretary of Energy. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $3,891,000. 

OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR ALASKA NATURAL GAS

TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

Appropriation, 2009 ............................................................................... $4,400,000 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... 4,466,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 4,466,000 

The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas 

Transportation Projects was established as an independent agency 

in the executive branch on December 13, 2006, pursuant to the 

Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act of 2004. The Committee recommends $4,466,000, the same as the budget request. 

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ........................... 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... $19,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ........................... 
158 

OFFSET FROM TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FUND

Appropriations, 2009 ............................................................................. ........................... 

Budget estimate, 2010 ........................................................................... ¥$19,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ........................... 

The Committee recommendation does not include the administration’s proposal to establish a congressionally funded Office of the 

Inspector General to oversee the Tennessee Valley Authority. In recent years, the TVA has funded the requests of the TVA–IG office 

out of power revenues and receipts. This process has worked well, 

and the Committee sees no compelling reason to change that mechanism for funding the TVA–IG. 

GENERAL PROVISION—INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

The following general provision is recommended by the Committee. 

Section 401. The provision addresses an issue with the Delta Regional Authority. 
(159) 

TITLE V 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

The following list of general provisions are recommended by the 

Committee. 

Section 501. The provision prohibits the use of any funds provided in this bill from being used to influence congressional action. 

Section 502. The provision addresses transfer authority under 

this act. 
(160) 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment to 

the House bill ‘‘which proposes an item of appropriation which is 

not made to carry out the provisions of an existing law, a treaty 

stipulation, or an act or resolution previously passed by the Senate 

during that session.’’ 

The Committee recommends funding for the following programs 

or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal year 2010: 

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: General Investigations; Construction, General; Mississippi River and Tributaries; Operations 

and Maintenance; Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program; 

Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation; 

Water and Related Resources; 

Department of Energy: Energy Conservation and Supply Activities: 

Office of Fossil Energy: Fossil Energy R&D, Clean Coal, Naval 

Petroleum and Oil Shale Research; 

Health, Safety and Security; 

Non-Defense Environmental Management; 

Office of Science; 

Department of Administration; 

National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons Activities; 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; Naval Reactors; Office of the Administrator; 

Defense Environmental Management, Defense Site Acceleration 

Completion; 

Other Defense Activities; 

Defense Nuclear Waste Fund; 

Office of Security and Performance Assurance; 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; 

Power Marketing Administrations: Southeastern, Southwestern, 

Western Area; and 

Energy Information Administration. 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI, OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 9, 2009, the 

Committee ordered reported an original bill (S. 1436) making appropriations for the energy and water development and related 

agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, subject to 

amendment and consistent with the budget allocation, and authorized the chairman of the committee or the chairman of the subcommittee to offer the text of the Senate-reported bill as a committee amendment in the nature of a substitute to the House com-
161 

panion measure, by a recorded vote of 30–0, a quorum being 

present. The vote was as follows: 

Yeas Nays 

Chairman Inouye 

Mr. Byrd 

Mr. Leahy 

Mr. Harkin 

Ms. Mikulski 

Mr. Kohl 

Mrs. Murray 

Mr. Dorgan 

Mrs. Feinstein 

Mr. Durbin 

Mr. Johnson 

Ms. Landrieu 

Mr. Reed 

Mr. Lautenberg 

Mr. Nelson 

Mr. Pryor 

Mr. Tester 

Mr. Specter 

Mr. Cochran 

Mr. Bond 

Mr. McConnell 

Mr. Shelby 

Mr. Gregg 

Mr. Bennett 

Mrs. Hutchison 

Mr. Brownback 

Mr. Alexander 

Ms. Collins 

Mr. Voinovich 

Ms. Murkowski 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports on 

a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute or part 

of any statute include ‘‘(a) the text of the statute or part thereof 

which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a comparative print of 

that part of the bill or joint resolution making the amendment and 

of the statute or part thereof proposed to be amended, showing by 

stricken-through type and italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical devices the omissions and insertions which 

would be made by the bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form 

recommended by the Committee.’’ 

In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law proposed to 

be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing law to be omitted 

is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is printed in italic; and 

existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman. 
162 

FORT PECK RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM ACT 

OF 2000, PUBLIC LAW 106–382 

SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

(a) ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX RURAL WATER SYSTEM.—There are 

authorized to be appropriated— 

(1) to the Bureau of Reclamation øover a period of 10 fiscal 

years¿ through fiscal year 2015, $124,000,000 for the planning, 

design, and construction of the Assiniboine and Sioux Rural 

Water System; and 

(2) to the Bureau of Indian Affairs such sums as are necessary for the operation and maintenance of the Assiniboine 

and Sioux Rural Water System. 

(b) DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM.—There is authorized 

to be appropriated, øover a period of 10 fiscal years¿ through fiscal 

year 2015, $51,000,000 for the planning, design, and construction 

of the Dry Prairie Rural Water System. 

CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001, PUBLIC 

LAW 106–554 

APPENDIX D—H.R. 5666 

TITLE V—LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER 

REGION 

SEC. 501. SHORT TITLE. 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 503. DELTA REGIONAL AUTHORITY. 

The Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 

U.S.C.1921 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘Subtitle F—Delta Regional Authority 

‘‘SEC. 382A. DEFINITIONS. 

* * * * * * * 

‘‘SEC. 382B. DELTA REGIONAL AUTHORITY. 

‘‘(a) 

* * * * * * * 

‘‘(c) VOTING.— 

ø‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A decision by the Authority shall require a majority vote of the Authority (not including any member representing a State that is delinquent under subsection 

(g)(2)(C)) to be effective.¿ 

(1) IN GENERAL—VOTING.—A decision by the Authority 

shall require the affirmative vote of the Federal cochairperson 

and a majority of the State members (not including any member representing a State that is delinquent under subsection 

(g)(2)(C)) to be effective. 
163 

FARM SECURITY AND RURAL INVESTMENT ACT OF 2002, 

PUBLIC LAW 107–171 

SEC. 2507. DESERT TERMINAL LAKES. 

(a) * * * 

(1) be used by the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

throughthe Commissioner of Reclamation, to provide water to 

at-risk natural desert terminal lakes; øor¿ 

(2) remain available until expendedø.¿ ; and 

(3) for efforts consistent with researching, supporting, and 

conserving fish, wildlife, plant, and habitat resources in the 

Walker River Basin. 

CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION, 2003, 

PUBLIC LAW 108–7 

SEC. 122. The non-Federal sponsor shall receive credit in an 

amount not to exceed ø$10,000,000¿ $27,000,000 toward their 

share of the cost of Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, 

Iowa, projects for work performed by the sponsor, or others on behalf of the sponsor, including planning, design, and construction 

performed after October 1, 2002, provided the Secretary of the 

Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, determines that such 

work is completed in accordance with United States Army Corps of 

Engineers standards and procedures and is integral to the Des 

Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt project. 

WATER SUPPLY, RELIABILITY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL 

IMPROVEMENT ACT, PUBLIC LAW 108–361 

TITLE I—CALIFORNIA WATER SECURITY 

AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT 

SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE. 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 103. BAY DELTA PROGRAM. 

(a) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(e) NEW AND EXPANDED AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The heads of the Federal agencies described in this subsection are authorized to carry out the activities described in subsection (f) during each of fiscal years 

2005 through ø2010¿ 2015, in coordination with the Governor. 

* * * * * * * 

(f) DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES UNDER NEW AND EXPANDED AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

(1) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(3) * * * 
164 

(A) * * * 

(B) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the appropriate authorizing and appropriating committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives a 

report that describes the levee stability reconstruction 

projects and priorities that will be carried out under this 

title during each of fiscal years 2005 through ø2010¿ 2015. 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 107. FEDERAL SHARE OF COSTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of the cost of implementing the Calfed Bay-Delta Program for fiscal years 2005 

through ø2010¿ 2015 in the aggregate, as set forth in the Record 

of Decision, shall not exceed 33.3 percent. 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 109. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATION. 

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary and 

the heads of the Federal agencies to pay the Federal share of the 

cost of carrying out the new and expanded authorities described in 

subsections (e) and (f) of section 103 $389,000,000 for the period of 

fiscal years 2005 through ø2010¿ 2015, to remain available until 

expended. 

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS 

ACT, 2006, PUBLIC LAW 109–103 

TITLE II 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

GENERAL PROVISIONS, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

SEC. 208. (a)(1) Using amounts made available under section 

2507 of the Farm and Security Rural Investment Act of 2002 (43 

U.S.C. 2211 note; Public Law 107–171), the Secretary shall provide 

ønot more than¿ $70,000,000 to the University of Nevada or the 

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. The Secretary may provide 

funds to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation in advance 

without regard to when exenses are incurred. The funds shall be 

subject to the provisions of the National Wildlife Foundation Establishment Act, excluding subsection (a) of section 10 of the Act (16 

U.S.C. 3709(a))— (A) to acquire from willing sellers land, water appurtenant 

to the land, and related interests in the Walker River Basinø, Nevada; and¿ ; and 

(B) to establish and administer an agricultural and natural resources center, the mission of which shall be to undertake research, restoration, and educational activities in the 

Walker River Basin relating to— 

(i) innovative agricultural water conservation; 

(ii) cooperative programs for environmental restoration; 

(iii) fish and wildlife habitat restoration; and 
165 

(iv) wild horse and burro research and adoption 

marketingø.¿ and 

(C) to design and implement conservation and stewardship 

measures to address impacts from activities carried out— 

(i) under subparagraph (A); and 

(ii) in conjunction with willing landowners. 

(2) In acquiring interests under paragraph (1)(A), the University of Nevada shall make acquisitions that øthe University determines are the most beneficial to—¿ the University of Nevada or the 

National Wildlife Foundation shall make acqusitions that the University or the Foundation determines to be the most beneficial to— 

WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007, 

PUBLIC LAW 110–114 

TITLE III—PROJECT-RELATED 

PROVISIONS 

SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA. 

The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified— 

(1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b), 

toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 

of design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 

interest for the project before, on and after the date of the partnership agreement for the project; and 

(2) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

TITLE V—MISCELLANEOUS 

SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL 

UTAH, AND WYOMING. 

* * * * * * * 

(1) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(3) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(h) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized 

to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period beginning 

with fiscal year 2001 $150,000,000 for rural Nevada, ø$25,000,000 

for each of Montana and New Mexico¿ $75,000,000 for Montana, 

$25,000,000 for New Mexico, $55,000,000 for Idaho, ø$50,000,000¿ 

$100,000,000 for rural Utah, and $30,000,000 for Wyoming. Such 

sums shall remain available until expended.’’. 

* * * * * * * 
166 

SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI. 

Section 592(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 

(113 Stat. 380; 117 Stat. 1837) is amended by striking 

‘‘$100,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000,000’’. 

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL 

PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 

308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93–344, AS AMENDED 

[In millions of dollars] 

Budget authority Outlays 

Committee 

allocation 

Amount 

of bill 

Committee 

allocation 

Amount 

of bill 

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations 

to its subcommittees of amounts in the Budget Resolution 

for 2010: Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development: 

Mandatory ............................................................................ .................... .................... .................... ....................

Discretionary ........................................................................ 33,750 33,750 43,201 1 43,201 

Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation: 

2010 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 2 19,820 

2011 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 9,270 

2012 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 3,004 

2013 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 607 

2014 and future years ........................................................ .................... .................... .................... 804 

Financial assistance to State and local governments for 

2010 ......................................................................................... NA 93 NA 19 

1 Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

2 Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

NA: Not applicable. 

DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING 

ITEMS 

The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the purse. 

The Committee believes strongly that Congress should make the 

decisions on how to allocate the people’s money. 

As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the 

term ‘‘congressional directed spending item’’ means a provision or 

report language included primarily at the request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan, loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, 

or other expenditure with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific 

State, locality or congressional district, other than through a statutory or administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process. 

For each item, a Member is required to provide a certification 

that neither the Member nor the Senator’s immediate family has 

a pecuniary interest in such congressionally directed spending 

item. Such certifications are available to the public on the website 

of the Senate Committee on Appropriations 

(www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm). 

Following is a list of congressionally directed spending items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this report, 

along with the name of each Senator who submitted a request to 

the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so identified. Neither 
167 

the Committee recommendation nor this report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff benefits as defined in rule XLIV. 
168 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM ...................................................................... $500,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ALAMOGORDO, NM ................................................................................................. $4,200,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK .............................................................................. $2,000,000 Murkowski Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ASCENSION PARISH, LA [EI] ................................................................................... $1,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, GA ................................................. $1,000,000 Chambliss, Isakson Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD ..................................................................... $4,500,000 Mikulski, Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR INLET, NJ ............................................ $5,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD ...................................................................... $4,000,000 Johnson, Thune Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO .................................................................. $750,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BRECKENRIDGE, MN ............................................................................................... $5,000,000 Klobuchar Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BREVARD COUNTY, FL (MID AND SOUTH REACHES) ............................................. $500,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET (ABSECON ISLAND), NJ .......... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, BRIGANTINE, NJ .................... $80,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC ...................................................................... $900,000 Burr, Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT ...................................................................................... $500,000 Leahy Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA ............................................................... $5,000,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER TRINITY RIVER, TX ..................................... $500,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA & 

PA.

$1,000,000 Cardin 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & VA ................................................. $2,000,000 Mikulski, Cardin, Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL ........................................................................................ $3,500,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... COMITE RIVER, LA .................................................................................................. $8,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX ..................................................................... $2,000,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA ................................................................................... $500,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER, TX .............................................. $22,000,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HELOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, BETHANY BEACH 

TO SOUTH BETHANY, DE.

$1,750,000 Carper, Kaufman 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, REHOBETH 

BEACH AND DEWEY BEACH, DE.

$2,000,000 Carper, Kaufman 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE ...................................................................... $390,000 Carper, Kaufman Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, NJ, PA, DE .................................. $10,000,000 Specter, Casey Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA ............................................................... $2,700,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA ..................................... $4,300,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DES PLAINES RIVER, IL .......................................................................................... $3,500,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM, MS ....................................... $8,000,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [FC] ................................................................... $3,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter 
169 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... EAST BATON ROUGE, LA [EI] ................................................................................. $500,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL .......................................................................... $540,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... FARMINGTON RECHARGE, CA ................................................................................. $1,000,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT .................................................................... $1,869,000 Tester, Baucus Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... GENESEE COUNTY, MI ............................................................................................ $600,000 Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... GEORGE W. KUHN DRAIN PROJECT, MI .................................................................. $300,000 Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... GRAND FORKS, ND—EAST GRAND FORKS, MN ..................................................... $2,617,000 Dorgan, Klobuchar Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NJ ................................................... $3,500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MI ................................. $2,000,000 Voinovich, Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV ............................................................................. $1,500,000 Byrd Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... GUADALUPE RIVER, CA .......................................................................................... $304,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ .......................................................................... $500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI .......................................................................... $2,000,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OHIO ............................................................. $1,656,000 Voinovich Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... IAO STREAMS, HI .................................................................................................... $250,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND LOGAN, WV, VA ....................................... $21,750,000 Byrd Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL .................................................................................... $950,000 Bill Nelson Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, VA .................................................... $2,234,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ARLINGTON, TX .................................... $1,500,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... JOSEPH G. MINISH WATERFRONT, NJ ..................................................................... $3,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... KAHUKU, HI ............................................................................................................ $4,360,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT .......................................................... $1,000,000 Leahy Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA [CG] ................................................................. $4,600,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... LEE COUNTY, FL ..................................................................................................... $1,400,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA, KY .............. $6,750,000 Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... VIRGINIA ........................................................................................................ ($4,000,000 ) Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... WEST VIRGINIA .............................................................................................. ($2,750,000 ) Byrd Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [EI] .................................................................................. $500,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV ........................................................................... $1,955,000 Byrd Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY CITY LEVEE, MO ................................................ $1,525,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MID VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA .................................................. $2,000,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELE, NM ................ $800,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MS ........................................... $10,000,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT, MO .......................... $1,000,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L–385), MO, IA, NE, KS ................................... $2,500,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND ...................................................................... $300,000 Conrad Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MT. ZION MILL POND DAM, FULTON COUNTY, IN .................................................. $575,000 Lugar Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MUDDY RIVER, MA ................................................................................................. $1,000,000 Kennedy, Kerry Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MURRIETA CREEK, CA ............................................................................................ $2,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NEGAUNEE, MI ........................................................................................................ $1,000,000 Levin, Stabenow 
170 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY .......................................................................... $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NEW YORK STATE CANAL, NY ................................................................................ $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA ........................................... $1,000,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ND ...................................... $15,000,000 Dorgan Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL ..................................................... $300,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... OHIO EI, OH ............................................................................................................ $1,000,000 Voinovich, Brown Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ONONDAGA LAKE, NY ............................................................................................. $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NY ............................................................................... $1,000,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL ................................................................................... $500,000 Bill Nelson Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MGMT, NJ ............................................................... $1,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... PLACER COUNTY, CA .............................................................................................. $2,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... POPLAR ISLAND, MD .............................................................................................. $350,000 Mikulski, Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WA .................................. $200,000 Murray, Cantwell Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RAMAPO RIVER AT MAHWAH AND SUFFERN, NJ .................................................... $200,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ .............................................................. $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT MONMOUTH, NJ ............................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK ................................................. $1,000,000 Inhofe Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LA, AR & TX ................................................... $2,000,000 Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, AR & TX ......................................... $2,000,000 Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RICHMOND CSO, VA ............................................................................................... $150,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ROSEAU, MN ........................................................................................................... $2,500,000 Klobuchar Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RURAL IDAHO ......................................................................................................... $2,000,000 Crapo/Risch Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RURAL MONTANA, MT ............................................................................................. $5,000,000 Tester, Baucus Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RURAL NEVADA [EI], NV ......................................................................................... $15,000,000 Reid, Ensign Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... RURAL UTAH, UT [EI] ............................................................................................. $20,000,000 Bennett Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA ......................... $500,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX .......................................................... $5,000,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA ....................................................................................... $2,500,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ .................................................................. $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SAULT STE MARIE REPLACEMENT LOCK, MI .......................................................... $1,000,000 Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA ........................................................................ $5,000,000 Murray Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM .............................................................. $4,000,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO .............................................. $4,000,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA ............................................................................ $3,000,000 Reid, Feinstein, Ensign Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... TAMPA HARBOR, FL ................................................................................................ $500,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ ......................................................... $2,000,000 Lautenberg, Menendez 
171 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO ........................................................................... $1,000,000 Roberts, Brownback, Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... TUSCALOOSA, AL .................................................................................................... $10,000,000 Shelby Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... UNALASKA, AK ........................................................................................................ $2,000,000 Murkowski, Begich Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA .............................................................................. $2,000,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA ................................................................ $1,200,000 Specter, Casey Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA .......................................................................................... $2,000,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CONSTRUCTION GENERAL ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES .............................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL ...................................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Guntersville Lake Hydrilla/Milfoil .................................................................. $150,000 Sessions Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Fife Lake Aquatic Weed Control, MI ............................................................. $145,000 Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Black Lake, Ogdensburg, NY ........................................................................ $100,000 Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Sodus Bay, NY .............................................................................................. $100,000 Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Lake Chautauqua, Jamestown, NY ............................................................... $50,000 Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Lake Champlain, VT ...................................................................................... $500,000 Leahy Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM .................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206) ............................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Upper York Creek Dam Removal, CA ............................................................ .......................... Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Tamarisk Eradication along the Colorado River, CO ................................... .......................... M. Udall, Bennet Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Mill River Restoration, Stamford, CT ............................................................ .......................... Lieberman Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Chattahoochee Fall-Line Ecosystem Restoration Project, GA ....................... .......................... Chambliss Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Paradise Creek, ID ........................................................................................ .......................... Crapo/Risch Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Chariton River/Rathbun Lake, IA .................................................................. .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Clear Creek and Iowa River, Johnson County, IA ......................................... .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Duck Creek, Davenport, IA ............................................................................ .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Whitebreast Creek Watershed, IA ................................................................. .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Buras Marina, LA .......................................................................................... .......................... Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... False River Ecosystem Restoration, Point Coupee, LA ................................. .......................... Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Lake Killarney, Louisiana State Penitentiary, LA .......................................... .......................... Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Zemurray Park Lake Restoration, Tangipahoa Parish, LA ............................ .......................... Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Milford Pond Restoration, Milford, MA ......................................................... .......................... Kennedy, Kerry Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, Howard County, MD .............................................. .......................... Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Dog Island Shoals, MD ................................................................................. .......................... Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Greenbury Point, MD ..................................................................................... .......................... Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... North Beach, MD ........................................................................................... .......................... Mikulski Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Northwest Branch, Anacostia River, MD ...................................................... .......................... Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Paint Branch Fish Passage, MD ................................................................... .......................... Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Painter Creek, MN ......................................................................................... .......................... Klobuchar Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Musconetcong River Dam Removals, NJ ...................................................... .......................... Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Blue Hole Lake State Park, NM .................................................................... .......................... Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Janes-Wallace Memorial Dam, Santa Rosa, NM .......................................... .......................... Bingaman, T. Udall 
172 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Kings Park, NY .............................................................................................. .......................... Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Mud Creek, Great South Bay, NY ................................................................. .......................... Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Soundview Park, Bronx, NY ........................................................................... .......................... Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Spring Creek, NY ........................................................................................... .......................... Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Concord Streams Restoration, NC ................................................................ .......................... Burr, Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Western Cary Stream Restoration, Cary, NC ................................................ .......................... Burr, Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Codorus Creek Watershed Restoration, PA ................................................... .......................... Casey Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Narrow River, RI ............................................................................................ .......................... Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Winneapaug Pond Restoration, RI ................................................................ .......................... Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204, 207, 933) .................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Houma Navigation Canal Barrier Island Restoration, LA ............................ .......................... Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NJIWW, Dredged Hole 35, NJ ......................................................................... .......................... Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205) .......................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Indian Bayou, AR .......................................................................................... .......................... Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Cosgrove Creek, Calaveras County, CA ........................................................ .......................... Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Las Gallinas Creek/Santa Venetia Levee, CA ............................................... .......................... Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Pennsylvania Avenue Improvement, DE ........................................................ .......................... Carper, Kaufman Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Indian/Dry Creek Cedar Rapids, IA ............................................................... .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Winnebago River, Mason City, IA ................................................................. .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Concordia, KS ................................................................................................ .......................... Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Neodesha, KS ................................................................................................ .......................... Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Sedgwick, KS ................................................................................................. .......................... Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Hopkinsville Dry-Dam, KY ............................................................................. .......................... McConnell, Bunning Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... North River, Peabody, MA ............................................................................. .......................... Kennedy, Kerry Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... McKinney Bayou, Tunica County, MS ............................................................ .......................... Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, MO ............................................................... .......................... Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Hatch, NM ..................................................................................................... .......................... Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Assunpink Creek, Hamilton Township, Mercer County, NJ ........................... .......................... Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Jackson Brook, NJ ......................................................................................... .......................... Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Pennsville, NJ ................................................................................................ .......................... Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Port Jervis, NY ............................................................................................... .......................... Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Philadelphia Shipyard Sea Wall, Philadelphia, PA ....................................... .......................... Specter, Casey Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... East Providence, RI ....................................................................................... .......................... Whitehouse Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107) .................................................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Oyster Point Marina/Park Breakwater, CA .................................................... .......................... Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Napolean Avenue Container Terminal Access, New Orleans, LA ................. .......................... Landrieu 
173 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Bass Harbor, ME ........................................................................................... .......................... Collins Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Rhodes Point, Somerset Co, MD ................................................................... .......................... Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Woods Hole, Great Harbor, Woods Hole, MA ................................................. .......................... Kennedy, Kerry Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Northwestern Michigan, Traverse City, MI .................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Hampton Harbor, NH ..................................................................................... .......................... Gregg, Shaheen Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Delaware River, Fairless Turning Basin, PA ................................................. .......................... Specter, Casey Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Charlestown Breachway and Inlet, RI .......................................................... .......................... Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Point Judith Harbor, Expansion Study, RI .................................................... .......................... Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Northwest Tennessee Regional Harbor, TN ................................................... .......................... Alexander, Corker Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Tangier Island Jetty, VA ................................................................................ .......................... Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION 111) ................................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Mattituck Harbor, NY .................................................................................... .......................... Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135) ...... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Lower Cache Restoration, AR ....................................................................... .......................... Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Millwood Lake, Grassy Lake, AR ................................................................... .......................... Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA ......................................................... .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Bayou Desiard, Monroe, LA ........................................................................... .......................... Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Houma Navigation Canal Mile 12–31.4 Restoration, Terrebonne Parish, 

LA.

.......................... Landrieu 

Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Morganza Fore-Bay Restoration, LA .............................................................. .......................... Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Lincoln Park West, Ecosystem Restoration Study, NJ .................................. .......................... Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Las Cruces Dam Environmental Restoration, Dona Ana County, NM .......... .......................... Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Northport Harbor, NY .................................................................................... .......................... Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Smokes Creek, NY ......................................................................................... .......................... Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Lake Champlain Lamprey Barriers, VT ......................................................... .......................... Leahy Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103) ...................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Bay Farm Island, CA (Bay Farm Dike, CA) .................................................. .......................... Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Goleta Beach, CA .......................................................................................... .......................... Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Pismo Beach, CA .......................................................................................... .......................... Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT ................................................................. .......................... Lieberman Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... Seaside Park, Ocean County, NJ ................................................................... .......................... Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106–457) ................................. $1,000,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... Construction, General ................................... SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ................. $1,000,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN—ELM CREEK) .............................................. $190,000 Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI ..................................................................................... $233,000 Inouye, Akaka Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. AMAZON CREEK, OR ............................................................................................... $320,000 Wyden, Merkley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD ....................... $321,000 Mikulski, Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. BALTIMORE METRO WATER RESOURCES—PATAPSCO URBAN RIVER REST, MD .. $100,000 Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. BLOOMSBURG, PA .................................................................................................. $130,000 Specter, Casey Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. BOGUE BANKS, NC ................................................................................................. $135,000 Burr, Hagan 
174 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. BOSSIER PARISH, LA .............................................................................................. $150,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. BRONX RIVER BASIN, NY ....................................................................................... $130,000 Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO ............................................................................ $242,000 Bond, Brownback, Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CACHE LA POUDRE, CO ......................................................................................... $50,000 M. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA ........................................................................... $675,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA ................................................................................. $153,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CEDAR RIVER TIME CHECK AREA, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA .......................................... $750,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY (SACRAMENTO-SAN 

JOAQUIN COMPREHENSIVE).

$425,000 Feinstein 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CENTRALIA, WA ...................................................................................................... $1,000,000 Murray Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA .................................................................................. $1,000,000 Murray Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV ..................................................................................... $600,000 Byrd Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL MANAGEMENT, MD ............. $170,000 Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, MD ...... $200,000 Mikulski, Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CHOWAN RIVER BASIN, VA ..................................................................................... $215,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA ............................................................................. $130,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, MA, NH & VT .................... $380,000 Dodd, Lieberman, Kennedy, Kerry Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. COYOTE DAM, CA ................................................................................................... $100,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. CROSS LAKE, LA ..................................................................................................... $100,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX .......................................... $2,125,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. DELAWARE RIVER BASIN, PINE KNOT, PA .............................................................. $130,000 Specter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, DE & NJ ...................... $166,000 Lautenberg, Specter, Kaufman, 

Menendez 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA .................................................. $78,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD .......................................... $233,000 Mikulski, Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, WA .................................................................................... $255,000 Murray, Cantwell Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. FLAGER COUNTY, FL ............................................................................................... $496,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. FOUR MILE RUN, VA ............................................................................................... $100,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA ............................................................. $255,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, KS ................................... $162,000 Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. GRAYSON AND MURDERER’S WALNUT CREEK BASIN, CA ..................................... $100,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS (RAP), MI ............................................... $850,000 Voinovich, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH ........................................................ $437,000 Voinovich Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK ...................................................................... $340,000 Murkowski, Begich Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. HUDSON—RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ ................................................................ $170,000 Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer, 

Gillibrand 
175 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. HUMBOLT BAY LONG TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, CA .................................... $130,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. HUMBOLT, IA .......................................................................................................... $130,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. JAMES RIVER, SD & ND ......................................................................................... $200,000 Dorgan Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, HI ....................................... $300,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. KOTZEBUE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK .................................................................... $210,000 Murkowski, Begich Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY ................................................................................. $441,000 Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LAKE WORTH INLET, FL .......................................................................................... $100,000 Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI ..................................... $215,000 Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LIDO KEY, SARASOTA, FL (SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL) ............................................ $340,000 Bill Nelson Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA ............................................ $100,000 Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERCOURSE, HEADWORKS, CA ........................................ $230,000 Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND VICINITY, CA ................. $130,000 Feinstein, Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA .................................................................................. $250,000 Feinstein, Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR ............................................... $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ ....................................................... $255,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI ................................................................................. $202,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH .............................................. $640,000 Voinovich Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA ........................................................................... $100,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MANHATTAN, KS ..................................................................................................... $255,000 Roberts, Brownback Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR ............................................................................. $425,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MIAMI HARBOR, FL ................................................................................................. $510,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MIDDLE CREEK, CA ................................................................................................ $250,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MIDDLE POTOMAC COMP PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC ........................................... $255,000 Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MIDDLE POTOMAC WATERSHED, GREAT SENECA CREEK AND MUDDY BRANCH, 

MD.

$255,000 Cardin 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MILE POINT, FL (JACKSONVILLE) ............................................................................ $185,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, MN .................................................................... $215,000 Klobuchar Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L455 & R460–471, MO ......................... $340,000 Bond, Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO ..................................................... $5,500,000 Dorgan, Conrad Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MONTAUK POINT, NY .............................................................................................. $255,000 Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. MONTPELIER, VT ..................................................................................................... $239,000 Leahy Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. NEW JERSEY SHORE PROECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ ................ $130,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM NOURISHMENT, NJ ............... $110,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA ............................................................................ $90,000 Webb, Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED, NY ........................................................................... $104,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC ........................................................ $274,000 Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, PA .............................. $2,000,000 Byrd Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. ONONDAGA LAKE, NY ............................................................................................. $215,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. OOLOGAH LAKE WATERSHED, KS AND OK .............................................................. $135,000 Inhofe Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PAJARO RIVER, CA ................................................................................................. $425,000 Feinstein, Boxer 
176 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ ............................................................................. $215,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ .............................................................................. $215,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS .............................................................................. $200,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PECKMAN RIVER BASIN, NJ .................................................................................... $300,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL ................................................................ $50,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR ...................................................................................... $425,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LA ..................................................................................... $107,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PORT OF IBERIA, LA ............................................................................................... $1,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL .................................................................................... $464,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ ...................................................................................... $255,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ ......................................... $255,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ .......................................... $25,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION-BEACH, NJ ..................................... $110,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE ......................................... $300,000 Carper, Kaufman Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD AND MANITOBA, CANADA ........... $2,900,000 Dorgan, Klobuchar, Conrad Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA ................................................................................. $210,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. REEDY RIVER, SC ................................................................................................... $170,000 Graham Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX ........................................................................ $120,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RIVER DES PERES, MO .......................................................................................... $100,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA ............................................................................... $221,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. S. FORK , SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, (BUBBLY CREEK), IL ...................... $100,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX ............................................................................ $170,000 Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, CA (SYSTEMS EVALUATION) ........... $425,000 Feintein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA .............................................................................. $100,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA ..................................................................... $340,000 Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA ............................................................................. $130,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), FRAZIER CREEK/STRATHMO, CA ................... $130,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY CREEK, CA ...................... $130,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA .............................. $640,000 Feinstein, Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS, ORESTIMBA CREEK, CA ............. $370,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA ................................................................... $425,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SANTA FE, NM ........................................................................................................ $228,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, GA PH II ............................................ $210,000 Chambliss, Graham Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON, PA ....................................................... $214,000 Specter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SKAGIT RIVER, WA .................................................................................................. $550,000 Murray, Cantwell Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA ............................................................................... $300,000 Murray, Cantwell 
177 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO ................................................................................. $82,000 Bennet Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ ............................................................. $215,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA ............................................................... $425,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK ........................................ $255,000 Inhofe Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS, AR ................................................................................... $210,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA ........................... $425,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX ................................................ $143,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA .............................................. $391,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. ST. HELENA-NAPA RIVER, CA ................................................................................. $170,000 Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA ........................................ $130,000 Murray Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ ........................................................ $110,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA ................................................................................ $130,000 Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC ........................................................ $187,000 Burr, Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL 

RESTORATION STUDY, MD, PA, & NY.

$130,000 Mikulski 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. TOPEKA, KS ............................................................................................................. $150,000 Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV ........................................................................................ $10,000,000 Reid, Ensign Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, FLOODPLAIN RECONNECTION, NY ........... $130,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, LIVINGSTON MANOR, NY ......................... $170,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER GUYANDOTTE, WV ....................................................................................... $300,000 Byrd Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, MN & WI ....................... $640,000 Durbin, Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER MISS-ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI ..................................... $9,000,000 Durbin, Harkin, Bond, Grassley, Klobuchar Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA ..................................................................... $1,700,000 Specter, Casey Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II) ...................................................... $170,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS .................................................................................... $170,000 Roberts, Brownback Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK .......................................................................... $385,000 Murkowski Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. VICINITY OF WILLOUGHBY SPIT, VA ....................................................................... $243,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WAIAKEA-PALAI STREAMS, HI ................................................................................. $300,000 Inouye, Akaka Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WALILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI ................................................................................ $175,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WALTON COUNTY, FL .............................................................................................. $229,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK .................................................................................... $215,000 Inhofe Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WATERTOWN AND VICINITY, SD .............................................................................. $448,000 Johnson, Thune Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WELLS LOCK AND DAM, LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV (LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, 

WV).

$40,000 Byrd 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WEST MAUI FEASIBILITY STUDY, HI ....................................................................... $100,000 Inouye, Akaka Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WEST SACRAMENTO, CA ......................................................................................... $950,000 Feinstein, Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA .............................................................. $425,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI ............................................................ $340,000 Voinovich Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WESTMINSTER (EAST GARDEN GROVE) WATERSHED, CA ...................................... $100,000 Feinstein 
178 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO ................................................. $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR ...................................................... $170,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WHITTIER HARBOR, AK ........................................................................................... $340,000 Murkowski Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR ........................................... $215,000 Wyden, Merkley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. GENERAL INVESTIGATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES ............................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES .................................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS ........................................................................ ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. LAKE TAHOE ............................................................................................................ $400,000 Reid, Feinstein Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES ........................................................................ ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Delaware Estuary Salinity Monitoring Study, DE & NJ ................................. $200,000 Lautenberg, Kaufman, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Hawaii DOT GIS, HI ....................................................................................... $100,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Hawaii Water Resources Management, HI ................................................... $270,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii, State of Hawaii and Pacific Territories, HI ......... $100,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Waimanalo Wastewater Effluent Reuse Plan, State of Hawaii and Pacific 

Territories, HI.

$67,000 Inouye 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. State of Hawaii General Flood Control Plan Update, State of Hawaii and 

Pacific Territories, HI.

$1,000,000 Inouye, Akaka 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA .................................................................... $36,000 Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Lake County Wetlands Restoration, IL .......................................................... $200,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Choctaw County Reservoir, MS ..................................................................... $100,000 Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Oklahoma Comp Water Plan, OK .................................................................. $500,000 Inhofe Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Storm Water Management Plan for Coastal Communities, VA .................... $220,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA .............................................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION ........................................................................ ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM ...................................................... $1,000,000 Wyden, Merkley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. PACIFIC ISLAND LAND OCEAN TYPHOON EXPERIMENT, HI ........................... $1,000,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. SURGE AND WAVE ISLAND MODELING STUDIES, HI ...................................... $1,250,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES .................................................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. White Clay Creek, New Castle, DE ............................................................... $200,000 Carper, Kaufman Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Hawaii Technical Services, HI ...................................................................... $40,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Hurricane Evacuation Studies, Hawaii ......................................................... $1,000,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Waiohuli Gulch Flood Hazard Study, Kula, Maui, HI .................................... $200,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Iowa Multi-State Dam Safety Analyses, IA ................................................... $37,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Little Sioux Watershed, IA ............................................................................. $50,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Mon-Maq Dam Removal Study & Local Floodplain Master Planning, Monticello, IA. $120,000 Harkin, Grassley 
179 

Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Chitimacha Tribe of LA, [GIS] ...................................................................... $250,000 Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. City of Alexandria, LA [GIS] .......................................................................... $200,000 Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. East Baton Rouge Parish, LA [GIS] .............................................................. $1,200,000 Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Livingston Parish, LA [GIS] ........................................................................... $350,000 Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Floodplain maps for Manalapan and Matchaponix Brooks, NJ ................... $500,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Southeastern, PA ........................................................................................... $250,000 Specter Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................. $5,000,000 Cochran Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, MD ............................................................. $1,000,000 Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... General Investigations ................................. Urban Flood Demonstration Program, DRI, NV ............................................. $2,500,000 Reid Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 106 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Cochran Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 107 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Johnson, Thune Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 108 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Bennett, Tester Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 109 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 110 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Klobuchar Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 111 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 112 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Murkowski Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 113 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Ben Nelson Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 114 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 205 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Tester Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 206 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Reid Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 207 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Reid Corps of Engineers ........... General Provision ......................................... Section 208 ............................................................................................................ .......................... Reid Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR .................................................................................. $10,000,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN ................................... $16,565,000 Cochran, Pryor, Landrieu, Bond, 

Lincoln, Wicker 

Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO ............................................................................... $3,700,000 Pryor, Bond Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA ...................................................... $336,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA ........................................................................................ $10,166,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... YAZOO BASIN—BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS ........................................................ $3,200,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... YAZOO BASIN—DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS .............................................. $23,200,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... YAZOO BASIN—MAIN STEM, MS ............................................................................ $25,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... YAZOO BASIN—REFORMULATION UNIT, MS .......................................................... $1,500,000 Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... YAZOO BASIN—UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS ...................................................... $13,000,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... YAZOO BASIN—BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU ................................................ $75,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—CG ................................................... YAZOO BASIN—YAZOO BACKWATER, MS .............................................................. $669,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—GI .................................................... QUIVER RIVER, MS ................................................................................................. $160,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—GI .................................................... SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR .................................................................................... $300,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—GI .................................................... SPRING BAYOU, LA ................................................................................................. $350,000 Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—GI .................................................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA .............................................................. $1,665,000 Cochran, Landrieu, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR ............................................................... $211,000 Pryor, Lincoln 
180 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR ......................................................... $25,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN ................................... $3,697,000 Cochran, Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln, 

Wicker 

Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... BONNET CARRE, LA ................................................................................................ $1,085,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, CAERNARVON, LA ..................................................... $1,442,000 Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... OLD RIVER, LA ....................................................................................................... $461,000 Landrieu Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS ...................................................................................... $476,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS ....................................................................................... $495,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS .................................................................... $779,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS .......................................................... $2,246,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS ............................................................................... $1,725,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS ....................................................................... $1,050,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS .............................................................................. $1,067,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS ........................................................................... $1,854,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS ........................................................................... $47,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS ........................................... $68,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... MR&T—Maintenance ................................... ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO ............................................................................... $3,600,000 Pryor, Bond, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Absecon Inlet, NJ ................................................................................................... $250,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Appomattox River, VA ............................................................................................ $500,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Ashtabula Harbor, OH ............................................................................................ $1,000,000 Voinovich Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway—DSC, VA ............................................................ $320,000 Webb, Warner Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, GA ....................................................................... $735,000 Chambliss Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, SC ....................................................................... $500,000 Graham Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Baltimore Harbor and Channel (50 Foot), MD ...................................................... $4,487,000 Mikulski, Cardin Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Bass Harbor, Tremont, ME ..................................................................................... $60,000 Collins Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Beaufort Harbor, NC .............................................................................................. $250,000 Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Blakely Mt Dam, Lake Ouachita, AR ..................................................................... $500,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Block Island Harbor of Refuge, RI ........................................................................ $1,250,000 Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Bogue Inlet, NC ...................................................................................................... $650,000 Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME ............................................................................ $750,000 Collins Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Bull Shoals Lake, AR ............................................................................................. $250,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Calcasieu River and Pass, LA ............................................................................... $6,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Carolina Beach Inlet, NC ....................................................................................... $500,000 Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Caruthersville Harbor, MO ..................................................................................... $760,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, SD .............................................. $3,000,000 Johnson, Thune Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Clairborne County Port, MS ................................................................................... $72,000 Cochran, Wicker 
181 

Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Clearwater Lake, MO .............................................................................................. $85,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Cleveland Harbor, OH ............................................................................................ $1,000,000 Voinovich Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Cocheco River Dredging Project, NH ..................................................................... $2,000,000 Gregg, Shaheen Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA & OR ............................................................... $641,000 Murray, Cantwell Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Columbia River Between Chinook and Sand Island, WA ...................................... $840,000 Murray Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Coos Bay, OR ......................................................................................................... $452,000 Wyden, Merkley Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... DeGray Lake, AR .................................................................................................... $500,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Depoe Bay, OR ....................................................................................................... $118,000 Wyden, Merkley Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Fox River, WI .......................................................................................................... $2,000,000 Kohl Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND ..................................................................... $200,000 Dorgan Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Georgetown Harbor, SC .......................................................................................... $1,000,000 Graham Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (New Harbor) ................................................... $100,000 Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Green Bay Harbor, WI ............................................................................................ $3,000,000 Kohl Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Gulfport Harbor, MS ............................................................................................... $1,530,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, DE ................................................................................. $200,000 Carper, Kaufman Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Illinois Waterway, IL & IN (MVR Portion) .............................................................. $900,000 Durbin Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL ..................... $1,220,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL ................................................ $189,000 Bill Nelson, Martinez Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, LA ......................................................................... $3,000,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Kodiak Harbor, AK .................................................................................................. $240,000 Murkowski Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Lake Providence Harbor, LA ................................................................................... $478,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Lockwoods Folly River, NC ..................................................................................... $600,000 Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Lower Monumental Lock & Dam, WA .................................................................... $4,000,000 Murray Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Madison Parish Port, LA ........................................................................................ $92,000 Landrieu, Vitter Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Marina Del Rey, CA ................................................................................................ $3,000,000 Feinstein, Boxer Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Michigan Harbor Dredging, MI .............................................................................. $7,000,000 Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Alpena Harbor, MI .................................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Arcadia Harbor, MI ................................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Au Sable, MI .......................................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Bay Port Harbor, MI ............................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Big Bay Harbor, MI ................................................................................................ .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Black River (Gogebic), MI ...................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Bolles Harbor, MI ................................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Clinton River, MI .................................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Eagle Harbor, MI .................................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Frankfort Harbor, MI .............................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Inland Route, MI .................................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Lac La Belle Harbor, MI ......................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Leland Harbor, MI .................................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI ....................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow 
182 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Little Lake Harbor, MI ............................................................................................ .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Ludington Harbor, MI ............................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Manistee Harbor, MI .............................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Manistique Harbor, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Marquette Harbor, MI ............................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Menominee Harbor, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... New Buffalo Harbor, MI ......................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Pentwater Harbor, MI ............................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Point Lookout Harbor, MI ....................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Port Austin Harbor, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ......................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Portage Harbor, MI ................................................................................................. .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Rouge River, MI ..................................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Saugatuck Harbor, MI ............................................................................................ .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... South Haven Harbor, MI ........................................................................................ .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... White Lake Harbor, MI ........................................................................................... .......................... Levin, Stabenow Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Missouri River—Rulo to the Mouth, IA, KS, MO & NE ......................................... $941,000 Harkin, Bond, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Mouth of Yazoo River, MS ..................................................................................... $72,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Narrows Dam, Lake Greeson, AR ........................................................................... $500,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... New Madrid Harbor (Mile 889), MO ...................................................................... $200,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... New Madrid Harbor, MO ........................................................................................ $310,000 Bond Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... New Topsail Inlet, NC ............................................................................................ $600,000 Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Newburyport Harbor, MA ........................................................................................ $350,000 Kennedy, Kerry Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Norwalk Harbor, CT ................................................................................................ $1,000,000 Dodd, Lieberman Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ......................................... $1,400,000 Mikulski Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Ogdensburg Harbor, NY ......................................................................................... $70,000 Schumer Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Osceola Harbor, AR ................................................................................................ $403,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Oswego Harbor, NY ................................................................................................ $300,000 Schumer, Gillibrand Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Pascagoula Harbor, MS ......................................................................................... $3,395,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay & Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT .............. $200,000 Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Petersburg North Harbor, AK ................................................................................. $500,000 Murkowski, Begich Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Port St. Joe, FL, DMMP .......................................................................................... $500,000 Bill Nelson Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Providence Harbor Shipping Channel, RI .............................................................. $300,000 Reed, Whitehouse Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Raritan River, NJ .................................................................................................... $380,000 Lautenberg, Menendez Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Red Rock Dam and Lake, Red Rock, IA ................................................................ $589,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Rosedale Harbor, MS ............................................................................................. $585,000 Cochran, Wicker 
183 

Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Savannah River Below Augusta, GA ...................................................................... $300,000 Isakson Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Saylorville Lake, IA ................................................................................................. $347,000 Harkin, Grassley Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Somerset County Channels, MD ............................................................................ $1,000,000 Mikulski Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS ............................ $400,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS ........................................................... $2,022,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Texas Water Allocation Assessment, TX ................................................................ $900,000 Hutchison, Cornyn Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Toledo Harbor, OH .................................................................................................. $1,000,000 Voinovich Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR .............................................................. $831,000 Wyden, Merkley Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Wilmington Harbor, DE .......................................................................................... $2,000,000 Carper, Kaufman Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Wilson Lake, KS ..................................................................................................... $300,000 Roberts Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Yazoo River, MS ..................................................................................................... $119,000 Cochran Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Yellow Bend Port, AR ............................................................................................. $111,000 Pryor, Lincoln Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Operation and Maintenance Items Not Listed Under States ................................ ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM ............................................................... $5,000,000 Cochran, Wicker Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM ......................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Hawaii RSM, HI ............................................................................................. $500,000 Inouye, Akaka Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Southeast Oahu Regional Sediment Management, HI ................................. $500,000 Inouye Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... North Carolina RSM, NJ ................................................................................ $600,000 Burr, Hagan Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Delaware Estuary RSM, NJ ............................................................................ $200,000 Lautenberg, Kaufman, Menendez, 

Lautenberg 

Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... South Coastal Rhode Island Regional Sediment Management ................... $750,000 Reed Corps of Engineers ........... Operation and Maintenance ......................... Chesapeake Bay, Newpoint Comfort, Mathews County, VA ......................... $350,000 Webb, Warner Bureau of Reclamation .... California Bay-Delta Restoration ................. CALFED ................................................................................................................... $10,000,000 Feinstein Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER & RECLAMATION REUSE ............................. $500,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... CHIMAYO, NM ......................................................................................................... $500,000 Bingaman Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS (NORTH LAS VEGAS, WATER REUSE) ........................ $2,000,000 Reid Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... CVP—FRIANT DIVISION .......................................................................................... $500,000 Feinstein Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... CVP—SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION ................................................................................ $7,000,000 Feinstein Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... DESCHUTES PROJECT ............................................................................................. $500,000 Wyden, Merkley Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY ..................................................... $500,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... FORT PECK DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM ................................................. $10,000,000 Tester, Baucus Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT ...................................... $100,000 Feinstein, Boxer Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... IRVINE BASIN GROUND & SURFACE WATER .......................................................... $100,000 Feinstein Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM .................................... $4,000,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM .............................................................. $1,200,000 Reid, Ensign Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS ........................................................................ $2,500,000 Reid, Feinstein Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM ........................................................... $14,000,000 Harkin, Johnson, Grassley, Klobuchar, Thune Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... LOAN FOR WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE, AZ .................................................. $3,209,000 Kyl Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION PROGRAM ..... $2,500,000 Hutchison 
184 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT .............................................................................. $160,000 T. Udall Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... MILK RIVER/ST. MARY DIVERSION REHABILITATION PROJECT ............................... $1,500,000 Tester Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... MNI WICONI PROJECT ............................................................................................. $10,000,000 Johnson, Thune Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... MOKELUMNE RIVER REGIONAL WATER STORAGE & CONJUNCTIVE USE ................ $500,000 Feinstein Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY ............................................................................ $7,791,000 Bingaman, T. Udall Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ........................................................ $500,000 Bennett Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY ........................................................................ $3,000,000 Murray, Cantwell Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ..................................................................... $150,000 Wyden, Merkley Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM ............................................................. $1,000,000 Johnson, Thune Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN—GARRISON DIVERSION ......................................... $33,707,000 Dorgan, Conrad Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM ....................... $15,000,000 Tester, Baucus Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION ................................................. $200,000 Wyden, Merkley Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... TUALATIN VALLEY WATER SUPPLY FEASIBILITY ..................................................... $300,000 Wyden, Merkley Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... WEBER BASIN PROJECT ......................................................................................... $1,000,000 Bennett, Hatch Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... WICHITA PROJECT—EQUUS BEDS DIVISION .......................................................... $2,000,000 Roberts, Brownback Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT ........................................ $1,500,000 Murray Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES ............................ ..........................Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM ................................................ $680,000 Feinstein Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................. ..........................Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ................................................................. $1,000,000 Feinstein, Bennet Bureau of Reclamation .... Water and Related Resources ...................... TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM ....................................... $2,500,000 Reid Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... Energy Development and Reliability (ND) ............................................................. $325,000 Senator Dorgan Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... Navajo Nation Electrification Program (NM) ......................................................... $1,750,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... North Dakota Energy Workforce Development (ND) ............................................... $1,900,000 Senator Dorgan Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... Oswego County BOCES Wind Turbine Model Project (NY) ..................................... $200,000 Senator Schumer Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... Power Grid Reliability and Security (WA) .............................................................. $1,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... Technology Development (ND) ............................................................................... $300,000 Senator Dorgan Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... UVM Smart Energy Grid Research (VT) ................................................................. $500,000 Senator Leahy Department of Energy ...... Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ... Watkins Glen, Schuyler County Gas Storage Project (NY) .................................... $500,000 Senator Gillibrand Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... 21st Century Renewable Fuels, Energy, and Materials Initiative (MI) ................. $1,250,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... A123Systems Large Format Nanophosphate Batteries for Solar Energy Storage 

(MI).

$1,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Algae Biofuels Research (WA) ............................................................................... $2,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Algae to Ethanol Research and Evaluation (NJ) ................................................... $750,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Algal-Based Renewable Energy for Nevada (NV) .................................................. $800,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Alternative and Unconventional Energy Research and Development (UT) ........... $10,000,000 Senator Bennett 
185 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Alternative Energy School of the Future (NV) ....................................................... $1,200,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Bayview Gas to Energy Project (UT) ...................................................................... $1,000,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Ben Franklin Technology Partners—Clean Technology Commercialization Initiative (PA). $500,000 Senators Specter, Casey Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Biodiesel Blending (WI) ......................................................................................... $600,000 Senator Kohl Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Biodiesel Feedstock Development Initiative (MO) ................................................. $1,000,000 Senator Bond Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Biomass Energy Resources Center (VT) ................................................................ $1,000,000 Senator Leahy Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Black Hills State Heating and Cooling Plant (SD) ............................................... $1,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Cellulosic Diesel Biorefinery (NJ) ........................................................................... $1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Center for Biomass Utilization (ND) ...................................................................... $7,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Center for Nanoscale Energy (ND) ......................................................................... $5,000,000 Senator Dorgan Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Center for Ocean Renewable Energy ..................................................................... $750,000 Senator Shaheen Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility (VT) ................................................ $500,000 Senator Leahy Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Clean Power and Energy Research Consortium (LA) ............................................ $1,000,000 Senator Landrieu Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Commercial Building Energy Efficiency Demonstration (IL) ................................. $500,000 Senator Durbin Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Cooling Heating and Power (Micro-CHP) and Bio-Fuel Application Center 

(MS).

$2,000,000 Senator Cochran 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Development of an Economic and Efficient Biodiesel Production Process (NC) .. $750,000 Senator Hagan Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Development of Biofuels Using Ionic Transfer Membranes (NV) .......................... $1,500,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks and Biomass Conversion (HI) ... $6,000,000 Senator Inouye Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... DRI Renewable Energy Center [REC] (NV) ............................................................ $500,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Energy Storage/Conservation and Carbon Emissions Reduction Demonstration 

Project (MA).

$400,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... EngenuitySC Commercialization and Entrepreneurial Training Project (SC) ........ $500,000 Senator Graham Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Demonstration Energy Park (NV) ........................... $200,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel Blanket Process Project (MA) ........................ $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Fuel Cell Durability Research (CT) ........................................................................ $1,000,000 Senator Dodd Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Gas heat pump cooperative training program (NV) ............................................. $250,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Genetic Improvement of Switchgrass (RI) ............................................................. $1,500,000 Senator Reed Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Great Basin College—Direct-Use Geothermal Demonstration Project (NV) ......... $1,000,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Great Lakes Institute for Energy Innovation (OH) ................................................. $1,000,000 Senator Voinovich Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Great Plains Wind Power Test Facility, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 

(TX).

$2,000,000 Senator Hutchison 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Hawaii Energy Sustainability Program (HI) ........................................................... $6,000,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture (HI) ........................................... $6,000,000 Senator Inouye Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... High Speed Wind Turbine Noise Model with Suppression (MS) ............................ $1,000,000 Senator Cochran Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Hydrogen Production and Delivery Technology (CT) .............................................. $500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... HyperCAST R&D Funding for Vehicle Energy Efficiency (CO) ................................ $750,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Independent Energy Community Renewable Power System (UT) .......................... $1,000,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Institute for Sustainable Energy (AL) .................................................................... $750,000 Senator Sessions 
186 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Iowa Central Community College Renewable Fuel Testing Laboratory (IA) .......... $750,000 Senator Harkin Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Lane Community College Energy Demonstration Building (OR) ........................... $550,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Lansing Plug-In Hybrid Initiative (MI) ................................................................... $750,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Low Cost Production of Thin-film Photovoltaic (PV) Cells (PA) ............................ $1,200,000 Senator Specter Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Marine Energy Technology (WA) ............................................................................. $1,750,000 Senator Murray Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy Consortium (AR) .................................................. $1,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Montana Algal BioDiesel Initiative (MT) ................................................................ $500,000 Senators Baucus, Tester Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Montana Bio-Energy Center of Excellence (MT) .................................................... $2,250,000 Senators Baucus, Tester Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Nanostructured Materials for Improved Photovoltaics (MS) ................................. $1,000,000 Senator Cochran Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Nanostructured Solar Cells for Increased Efficiency and Lower Cost (AR) .......... $500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... National Center of Excellence in Energy Storage Technology (OH) ...................... $1,000,000 Senator Voinovich Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... National Open—Ocean Energy Laboratory (FL) .................................................... $2,000,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX (TX) ............... $2,000,000 Senator Hutchison Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Near zero carbon footprint energy creation through thermal oxidation (PA) ....... $1,000,000 Senator Specter Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Nevada Renewable Energy Integration and Development Consortium (NV) ......... $3,000,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... NIREC—Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization (NV) ........... $1,000,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Northern Nevada Renewable Energy Training Project (NV) ................................... $500,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Norwich Cogeneration Initiative (CT) ..................................................................... $750,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Novel Photocatalytic Metal Oxides (NE) ................................................................ $250,000 Senator Ben Nelson Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Offshore Wind Initiative (ME) ................................................................................ $5,000,000 Senators Collins, Snowe Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center (OH) .............................................. $500,000 Senator Brown Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Oregon Solar Highway—Innovative Use of Solar Technology (OR) ...................... $1,000,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project (CA) ........................................... $1,000,000 Senator Feinstein Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Power Cube for Wind Power and Grid Regulation Services (PA) .......................... $500,000 Senator Specter Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Renewable Energy Clean Air Project [RECAP] (MN) .............................................. $1,000,000 Senator Klobuchar Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Renewable Energy Demonstration (IL) ................................................................... $500,000 Senator Durbin Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Renewable Energy Feasibility Study and Resources Assessment (NV) ................. $500,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Renewable Energy Initiative (IL) ............................................................................ $500,000 Senator Durbin Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Renewable Energy Initiatives for Clark County, Nevada Parks and Recreation 

(NV).

$1,000,000 Senator Reid 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Research on Fuel Cell Powered by Hydrogen Produced from Biomass to Provide 

Clean Energy for Remote Farms away from Electric Grids (NY).

$675,000 Senator Schumer 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... San Francisco Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Initiative (CA) ............................... $500,000 Senator Boxer Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Shenandoah Valley as a National Demonstration Project Achieving 25 Percent 

Renewable Energy by the Year 2025 (VA).

$750,000 Senators Webb, Warner 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Smart Energy Program (CT) ................................................................................... $500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman 
187 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Solar Compactor Energy Efficiency Research Demonstration Project (MA) .......... $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Solar Energy Development, University of Maine, Presque Isle, ME ...................... $800,000 Senator Collins Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Solar Electric Power for Nonsectarian Educational and Social Services Facility 

(NV).

$500,000 Senator Reid 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Solar Energy Zone Planning and Infrastructure for the Nevada Test Site and 

Adjacent Lands (NV).

$1,000,000 Senator Reid 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Solar Panels in Municipal Owned Buildings (NJ) ................................................. $1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Solar Pioneer and Solar Entrepreneur Programs (NY) .......................................... $500,000 Senator Gillibrand Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Southern Pine Based Biorefinery Center (GA) ....................................................... $1,000,000 Senator Chambliss Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Designs (MS) .................... $4,000,000 Senator Cochran Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project (AK) ................................ $2,500,000 Senators Murkowski, Begich Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Strategic Biomass Initiative (MS) ......................................................................... $500,000 Senator Cochran Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Student Sustainability Initiatives (VT) .................................................................. $300,000 Senator Sanders Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Sun Grant Initiative (SD) ....................................................................................... $2,750,000 Senator Johnson Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Sustainable Energy Research Center (MS) ............................................................ $10,000,000 Senator Cochran Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Switchgrass Biofuel Research: Carbon Sequestration and Life Cycle Analysis 

(NE).

$500,000 Senator Ben Nelson 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... The CUNY Energy Institute (NY) ............................................................................ $1,550,000 Senators Schumer, Gillibrand Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & Development (VT) .......................................... $500,000 Senator Leahy Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Unconventional and Renewable Energies Research Utilizing Computer Simulations (UT). $2,500,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... University of Louisville Research and Energy Independence Program (KY) ......... $2,000,000 Senator McConnell Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... University of New Haven Solar Testing and Training Lab (CT) ............................ $500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... UNR—Biodiesel from Food Waste (NV) ................................................................. $1,000,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... UNR—Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy (NV) ....................................... $1,000,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... UNR—Mass Exchanger Technology for Geothermal and Solar Energy Systems 

(NV).

$1,200,000 Senator Reid 

Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Vermont Biofuels Initiative (VT) ............................................................................ $750,000 Senator Leahy Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VT) ....................................................... $450,000 Senator Sanders Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Wallowa County Integrated Biomass Energy Center (OR) ..................................... $500,000 Senators Wyden, Merkley Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Washoe Wind Turbine Demonstration Project (NV) ............................................... $50,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Wind Turbine Development (MT) ............................................................................ $1,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester Department of Energy ...... Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .... Wind Turbine Infrastructure for Green Energy and Research on Wind Power in 

Delaware (DE).

$1,000,000 Senators Carper, Kaufman 

Department of Energy ...... Environmental Management—Defense ....... Characteristics and Cleanup of the U.S. Nuclear Legacy (MS) ............................ $4,000,000 Senator Cochran Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Design and Test of an Advanced SOFC Generator in PA (PA) ............................. $1,000,000 Senator Specter Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Fossil Fuel Research and Development (ND) ........................................................ $4,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium (MS) ............................................ $1,200,000 Senator Cochran Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing Station (WV) ................................................................ $1,200,000 Senator Byrd 
188 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Development of a Coal 

Liquefaction Sector in China (WV).

$1,250,000 Senator Byrd 

Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Montana ICTL Demonstration (MT) ........................................................................ $1,250,000 Senator Baucus Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ National Center for Hydrogen Technology (ND) ..................................................... $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic Membranes (UT) ........................................... $1,500,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Shallow Carbon Sequestration Pilot Demonstration (MO) ..................................... $2,400,000 Senator Bond Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Utah Center for Ultra-Clean Coal Utilization and Heavy Oil Research (UT) ........ $8,000,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Fossil Energy ................................................ Utah Coal and Biomass to Fuel Pilot Plant .......................................................... $2,500,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Nuclear Energy ............................................. Nuclear Fabrication Consortium (OH) .................................................................... $2,000,000 Senator Voinovich Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering Equipment (IN) ................................. $1,000,000 Senator Lugar Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Alaska Climate Center (AK) ................................................................................... $1,000,000 Senator Murkowski Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Antibodies Research (ND) ...................................................................................... $3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Carbon Nanotube Technology Center [CANTEC] (OK) ............................................ $1,000,000 Senator Inhofe Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Center for Advanced Bio-Based Binders and Pollution Reduction Technologies 

at the University of Northern Iowa (IA).

$950,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley 

Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems (WV) .............................................................. $3,000,000 Senator Byrd Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Center of Excellence and Hazardous Materials (NM) ............................................ $750,000 Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Clean Energy Infrastructure Educational Initiative (OH) ...................................... $500,000 Senator Brown Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Climate Model Evaluation Program (AL) ............................................................... $1,800,000 Senator Shelby Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Computing Capability (ND) .................................................................................... $5,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Conrad Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Development of Ultrafiltration Membrane-Separation Technology for Energy-Efficient Water Treatment and Desalination Process (NV). $800,000 Senator Reid Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Enhancement for the Intermountain Center for River Restoration and Rehabilitation (UT). $600,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Environmental Quality Monitoring and Analysis (IL) ............................................. $500,000 Senator Durbin Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Fuel Cell Research, Brown University, RI (RI) ....................................................... $1,500,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Functional MRI Research (VT) ............................................................................... $1,200,000 Senator Leahy Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Idaho Accelerator Center Production of Medical Isotopes (ID) ............................. $1,500,000 Senators Crapo, Risch Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Kansas University Cancer Research Equipment (KS) ........................................... $4,000,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Marine Systems Energy/Environmental Sustainability Research (MA) .................. $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Martin County Microfiber Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology Development (NC) ....... $1,000,000 Senators Burr, Hagen Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Material Science Smart Coatings (NE) .................................................................. $500,000 Senator Ben Nelson Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Nanotechnology Initiative (CT) ............................................................................... $750,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Nevada Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization Center [CAVE] 

(NV).

$500,000 Senator Reid 

Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Performance Assessment Institute (NV) ................................................................ $1,000,000 Senator Reid 
189 

Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Pioneer Valley Life Science Institute Translational Biomedical Research (MA) ... $400,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Renovation and Development of the LSU Nuclear Science Building (LA) ............ $1,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... RNAI Research (MA) ............................................................................................... $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Science Center Equipment and Energy Efficient LEED Technology (UT) .............. $900,000 Senator Bennett Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Smart Grid Communications Security Project (CO) ............................................... $1,000,000 Senator Mark Udall Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... SUU Science Center Energy Efficiency Modernization and Enhancement Project 

(UT).

$1,000,000 Senator Bennett 

Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Targeted Radiotherapy for Melanoma (MA) ........................................................... $300,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Technology Transfer & Commercialization of Technologies at DOE Laboratories. 

(NM).

$750,000 Senator Bingaman 

Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... The New School Green Building (NY) .................................................................... $1,000,000 Senators Schumer, Gillibrand Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... USD Catalysis Group for Alternative Energy (SD) ................................................. $1,100,000 Senator Johnson Department of Energy ...... Office of Science .......................................... Yttrium-90 Microspheres Research (WA) ............................................................... $1,250,000 Senator Murray Department of Energy ...... Other Defense Activities ............................... Burlington Atomic Energy Commission Plant [BAECP] and Ames Laboratory 

Former Workers Medical Surveillance Programs [FWP] (IA).

$1,000,000 Senator Harkin 

Department of Energy ...... Other Defense Activities ............................... Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN (KY, 

OH, TN).

$1,000,000 Senator McConnell 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... AIWW, BRIDGES AT DEEP CREEK, VA ........................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ALTON TO GALE LEVEE DISTRICT, IL & MO (DEF CORR) .......................................................... $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES), CA ....................................................... $6,700,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS), CA ........................................ $66,700,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM RAISE), CA ....................................................... $600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ANTELOPE CREEK, NE ................................................................................................................ $5,697,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT, NY ...................................... $3,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO ................................................................................ $5,600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... BLUESTONE LAKE, WV ............................................................................................................... $86,700,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX .................................................................................................... $5,300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY) .............................................................................................. $24,250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, NC ......................................................................................... $1,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL ...................................................................................... $5,565,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CENTER HILL DAM (SEEPAGE CONTROL), TN ............................................................................ $56,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL (DEF CORR) ................................................. $6,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CHESTERFIELD, MO .................................................................................................................... $3,331,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL .............................................. $5,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN ........................................................................... $1,000,000 The President 
190 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CHIEF JOSEPH GAS ABATEMENT, WA ......................................................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL) .......................................................................... $40,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR & WA ......................................................................... $85,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA .................................................. $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... DES PLAINES RIVER, IL ............................................................................................................. $6,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... DOVER DAM, MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE) .......................................... $18,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA ................................................................................ $2,600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... EAST ST. LOUIS, IL .................................................................................................................... $2,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ELK CREEK LAKE, OR ................................................................................................................ $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION) ................................... $25,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY ............................................................................. $5,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND (REPLACEMENT) ....................................................... $8,620,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ ....................................................................... $6,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA .................................................................. $14,250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE CONTROL) .................................................................... $130,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA ....................................................................................................... $13,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA ..................................................................................... $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (REPLACEMENT) ............................................ $16,915,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS ........................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... KAWEAH RIVER, CA .................................................................................................................... $640,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE RIVER, KY ................................................................. $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (CG) .................................................................................... $5,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN ....................................................................................................... $20,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA ...................................................... $6,210,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY .......................................................................................................... $700,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, CA .......................................................... $885,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA, OR ................................................ $1,650,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMP, WA, OR, ID ................................................. $1,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY, IL (MAJOR REHAB) .............................................................. $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MARTIN COUNTY, FL .................................................................................................................. $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL ............................................................................... $25,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL .................................. $580,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE ........................................................... $60,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA ................................................................................ $1,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA ......................................................................................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... MUDDY RIVER, MA ..................................................................................................................... $5,000,000 The President 
191 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... NAPA RIVER SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA ........................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... NAPA RIVER, CA ........................................................................................................................ $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ ..................................................................... $60,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA ................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA .............................................................................. $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL & KY ................................................................... $105,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... PINELLAS COUNTY, FL ............................................................................................................... $6,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR ..................................................................................... $42,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... PRESQUE ISLE, PA ..................................................................................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ ............................................................ $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC ....................................................................... $1,615,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM ..................................... $800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR ............................................................................................................ $5,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS AREA, VA ......................................................... $1,075,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA ......................................................................... $10,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA ............................................................. $15,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA ............................................................................................. $52,193,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA ............................................................................................................ $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX ....................................................................................................... $18,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL ................................................. $163,402,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA ............................................................................ $2,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO .......................................................................................... $566,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ST. PAUL HARBOR, AK ............................................................................................................... $3,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (DAM SAFETY), CA ....................................................................... $10,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX .......................................................................................................... $6,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO .............................................................................................. $3,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI .............................................. $18,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WASHINGTON, DC & VICINITY .................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET, NC .................................................................. $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WEST SACRAMENTO, CA ............................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WILLAMETTE TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR ............................................................................... $11,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC ......................................................................................................... $1,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL) .......................................... $123,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL ............................................................................................................. $1,170,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES ................................................ ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL ......................................................................................................... $5,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM ........................................................................................ ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206) ....................................................... $25,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Goose Creek, CO ...................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Jackson Creek, Gwinnett Co, GA ............................................................................. .......................... The President 
192 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Little River Watershed, Hall County, GA ................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Chariton River and Rathbun Lake Watershed, IA .................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Emiquon Preserve, IL ............................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Orland Park, IL ........................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Storm Lake, IA ......................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Ventura Marsh, IA ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Malden River Ecosystem, MA .................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Wilson Bay Restoration, Jacksonville, NC ............................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Drayton Dam, ND ..................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Camp Creek, Zumwalt Prairie Preserve, OR ........................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Eugene Delta Ponds, OR ......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Kellogg Creek, OR .................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Oaks Bottom, OR ..................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Springfield Millrace, OR .......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Moses Lake, TX ........................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Rio Grande Ecosystem Restoration, Laredo, TX ...................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Spring Lake, San Marcos, TX .................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Stephenville WWTP, TX ............................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Carpenter Creek, WA ............................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material (Sections 204, 207, 933) ............................ ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Blackhawk Bottoms, IA ........................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Atchafalaya River, Shell Island Pass, St. Mary Parish, LA .................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Calc Rv, Mi 5–14 Ks, LA ........................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, MA ............................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Newbury Harbor, MA ................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... NJIWW Beneficial Use of Dredge, NJ ....................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Buffalo River, NY ..................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Manteo Old House, NC ............................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Maumee Bay Regional Sediment Management, OH ............................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Wynn Road Regional Sediment management, OH .................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... South Padre Island, TX ........................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION 14) ....................... $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205) .................................................................... $38,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Wynne, AR ................................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA ....................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Eureka Creek, Manhattan, KS ................................................................................. .......................... The President 
193 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Little River Diversion, Dutchtown, MO .................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Livingston, MT ......................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Platt River, Fremont, NE ......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Platt River, Schuyler, NE ......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH (Ottawa, OH) ........................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Duck Creek, OH ....................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Findlay, OH .............................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Rio Desclabrado, PR ................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Rio Guamani-Guaya, PR .......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Beaver Creek and Tribs, Bristol, TN ....................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... WV Statewide Flood Warning System, WV .............................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107) ............................................................................ $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Savoonga Harbor, AK ............................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME .............................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mackinac Island Harbor Breakwater, MI ................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mitigation of Shore Damages (Section 111) .......................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mobile Pass, AL ....................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... East Pass Channel, Panama City, FL ..................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Brun Harbor/Jekyll Improvements, GA ..................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Camp Ellis, Saco, ME .............................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Manistee Harbor and River Channel, MI ................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Fairport Harbor, OH ................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Vermillion Harbor, OH .............................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Whitcomb Flats, WA ................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135) ................ $25,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Lower Kingman Island, DC ...................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Braided Reach, ID ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Shorty’s Island, ID ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Green River Dam Mod, KY ....................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Bloomington State Park, MO ................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Blue Valley Wetlands, Jackson County, MO ............................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Duck Creek, Stoddard County, MO .......................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Aquatic Habitat Restoration at Pueblo of Santa Ana, NM .................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Prison Farm Shoreline Habitat, ND ......................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Tappan Lake, OH ..................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Lower Columbia Slough, OR .................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Walla Walla River, OR ............................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Bennington Lake Diversion Dam, WA ..................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Shore Protection (Section 103) ............................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Coastal Areas, Marshfield, MA ................................................................................ .......................... The President 
194 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Fort San Geronimo, PR ............................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Lincoln Park Beach, WA .......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Snagging and Clearing (Section 208) .................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Camp Bayou Canal, Morehouse Parish, LA ............................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Snagging and Clearing Upper Bayou Boeuf, LA ..................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Auglaize River, OH ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Blackwell Lake, Blackwell, OK ................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... SWCD Flood Reduction, OR ..................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION PROGRAM .............................................. $49,100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Isabella Dam, CA .................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Martis Creek Dam, CA & NV ................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Cherry Creek Dam, CO ............................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Dworshak Dam, ID ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... John Day Lock and Dam, OR & WA ........................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Seepage/Stability Correction Studies ............................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Blakely Mountain Dam, AR ..................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Hidden Dam, CA ...................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... San Antonio Dam, CA .............................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Terminus Dam, CA .................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Whittier Narrows Dam, CA ...................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Trinidad Dam, CO .................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Hop Brook Dam, CT ................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mansfield Hollow Dam, CT ...................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Herbert Hoover Dike (Reach 2&3), FL ..................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Dworshak Dam, ID ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... La Grange L&D, IL ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Lake Shelbyville Dam, IL ......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mississippi River, Lock and Dam 24, IL&MO ......................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mississippi River, Lock and Dam 25, IL&MO ......................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Thomas J. O’Brien Controlling Works L&D, IL ........................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Brookville Dam, IN ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... J. Edward Roush Dam, IN ....................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Patoka Lake Dam, IN .............................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Salamonie Lake Dam, IN ......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Hartford Levee at John Redmond, KS ..................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Green River Lake Dam, KY ...................................................................................... .......................... The President 
195 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Markland Locks and Dam, KY & OH ....................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Nolin Lake Dam, KY ................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Rough River Lake, Dam, KY .................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Salamonie Lake Dam, KY ........................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Russell B. Long L&D, LA ......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Westville Lake Dam, MA .......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mississippi River Lock and Dam 1, MN ................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mississippi River Lock and Dam 2, MN ................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mississippi River Lock and Dam 3, MN ................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Orwell Reservoir Dam, MN ...................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Arkabutla, MS .......................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Cape Fear River Lock and Dam 1, NC ................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Beach City Dam, OH ............................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Bolivar Dam, OH ...................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Delaware Dam, OH .................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Magnolia Levee,(Bolivar Dam), OH ......................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mohawk Dam, OH .................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Cumberland Dike—Texoma, OK .............................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Keystone Lake Dam, OK .......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, OK .......................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Bonneville Lock and Dam, OR & WA ...................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Foster Dam, OR ....................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Willamette Falls Lock, OR ....................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Charlerois (MonoR), PA ........................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Curwensville Dam, PA ............................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... East Branch Dam, Clarion River, PA ...................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Hammond Dam, PA ................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Montgomery Locks and Dam, PA ............................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... J. Percy Priest, TN ................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Addicks Dam, Buffalo Bayou, TX ............................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Barker Dam (Buffalo Bayou,), TX ........................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Lewisville Dam, TX .................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Proctor Dam, TX ...................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Stillhouse-Hollow Dam, TX ...................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Town Bluff Dam, TX ................................................................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Whitney Levee, TX .................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Ball Mountain Dam, VT ........................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Howard Hansen Dam, WA ....................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Mill Creek and Mill Creek Diversion Dam, WA ....................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... New Cumberland L&D, WV ...................................................................................... .......................... The President 
196 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Cedars Lock and Dam, WI ...................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Depere Gen Laws, WI .............................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Little Chute, WI ....................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Rapide Croche Lock and Dam, WI .......................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROGRAM (DMDF) ................................................. $5,199,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Jacksonville Harbor, FL ..................................................................................................... ($1,000,000 ) The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Savannah Harbor, GA ....................................................................................................... ($900,000 ) The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Calumet Harbor and River, IL & IN ................................................................................. ($1,501,000 ) The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... Charleston Harbor, SC ...................................................................................................... ($1,798,000 ) The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND ........................................................................................... $21,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106–457) .................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD EXPENSES) ........................................................... $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Construction, General ...................... INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE EXP) ......................................................................... $275,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI ......................................................................................................... $408,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... AUGUSTA, GA ............................................................................................................................. $278,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA .......................................................................................................... $1,239,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA .............................................................................. $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX ........................................................... $526,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY ..................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... CALCASIEU LOCK, LA ................................................................................................................. $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA ................................................................ $900,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA ......................................................................................... $950,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... CURRITUCK SOUND, NC ............................................................................................................. $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ .................................................................................... $290,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II) ............................................................................................ $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD ............................................................. $483,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... EDISTO ISLAND, SC .................................................................................................................... $167,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... FREEPORT HARBOR, TX ............................................................................................................. $675,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, TX .................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI .......................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... GREEN RIVER WATERSHED, KY ................................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX .................................................................. $423,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL ............................................................................................. $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... HAMILTON CITY, CA ................................................................................................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY ...................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... HUDSON—RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ ............................................ $200,000 The President 
197 

Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... HUDSON—RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ ...................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL ................................................................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... INDIAN RIVER LAGOON NORTH, FL ............................................................................................ $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... INDIANA HARBOR, IN ................................................................................................................. $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQ NUISANCE, IL, IN, OH, WI ... $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH NY .............................................................. $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (Section 216) ................................................. $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS ........................................................................................................... $224,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA ....................................................... $23,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... LOUISIANA COASTAL PROTECTION & RESTORATION (LACPR), LA ............................................. $3,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX ........................................................................................ $425,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA & OR ............................................. $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA ................................................................................................... $112,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK ......................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA .................................................................. $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN ................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD (MN RIVER AUTHORITY) ............................ $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS ............................................................................... $600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC ........................................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX ...................................................................................... $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... OCMULGEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, GA ........................................................ .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA ......................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PIMA COUNTY, AZ ...................................................................................................................... $275,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL ............................................................................................... $510,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, WA ............................................ $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PUYALLUP RIVER, WA ................................................................................................................ $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD AND MANITOBA, CANADA .............................. $3,050,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX ............................................................................................................. $304,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX ...................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA ................................................................ $468,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA ......................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ ............................................................................. $511,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA .......................................................................................... $278,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... ST LOUIS, MO (WATERSHED) ..................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SUTTER COUNTY, CA ................................................................................................................. $339,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... TOPEKA, KS ................................................................................................................................ $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... TYBEE ISLAND, GA ..................................................................................................................... $206,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA ................................................................................................. $386,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ ................................................................. $658,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA ........................................................................... $203,000 The President 
198 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN ....................................................... $271,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR ................................................................. $240,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK ............................................................................................................... $450,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT ....................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... GENERAL INVESTIGATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES .................................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES ..................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... ACCESS TO WATER DATA (TECH ASSIST—SEC 2017 WRDA 2007) ................................ $750,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ...................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS .................................................................................. $4,730,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES .................................................................................. $8,051,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Arizona Department of Water Resources, AZ .......................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... City of Los Angeles, CA ........................................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... City of Palmdale, CA ............................................................................................... $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Los Angeles County, CA .......................................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... San Bernadino County, CA ...................................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... San Manuel Band of Indians, CA ........................................................................... $66,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Soboba Band of Indians, CA ................................................................................... $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... West Canal/Willow Brook Flood Management Study, New Britain, CT ................... $20,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... South Bethany Tidal Pump System Study, DE ........................................................ $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Effingham County Storm Water Management Plan, GA ......................................... $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Northwest GA Watershead, GA ................................................................................ $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Nishnabotna Watershed, IA ..................................................................................... $341,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Willow Creek, IA ....................................................................................................... $45,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Big Wood River—Belvue Idaho, ID ......................................................................... $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Weiser R. Floodplain Analysis, ID ........................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... KS River Water Resources, KS ................................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PAS Tribal Support, KS ............................................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Bardstown, KY ......................................................................................................... $88,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Louisville Parks, KY ................................................................................................. $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Chitimacha Watershed Planning, LA ...................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... New Orleans River Park, LA .................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Port of Lake Charles Master Plan, LA .................................................................... $125,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... River Parishes Pedestrian Plan, LA ........................................................................ $125,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... St. Johns Parish Monumentation, LA ...................................................................... $125,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Tunica Recreation Trail, Tunica-Biloxi Tribe, LA .................................................... $125,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Penn’s Hill Drainage Study, Quincy, MA ................................................................. $10,000 The President 
199 

Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Town Line Brook Drainage Assessment, Malden, MA ............................................. $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Montgomery County, MD .......................................................................................... $20,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Macomb County Drain Mapping & Database, MI ................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Stream Characteristics Study for Saganing River, MI ........................................... $80,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Cape Girardeau Groundwater Study, MO ................................................................ $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... City of Marquand Flood Study, MO ......................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PAS MO MDNR Northwest Missouri, MO ................................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Peruque Creek Water Quality, MO ........................................................................... $30,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... St Charles Riverfront Micro-Model, MO .................................................................. $90,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Henry R Dam, Burke, Co., NC ................................................................................. $48,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Goochs Milll, Grnadville, Co., NC ............................................................................ $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Fontenelle/Bellevue, NE ........................................................................................... $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Spicket River Watershed Study, NH ........................................................................ $55,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Grants Drainage Management Plan, NM ................................................................ $56,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Tarrytown, NY .......................................................................................................... $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Town of Clarence, NY .............................................................................................. $80,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Wappingers Falls, NY .............................................................................................. $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Harpersfield Dam, Grand River, OH ........................................................................ $88,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... State of Ohio GIS, OH ............................................................................................. $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PAS Boone Nute Slough, OR ................................................................................... $27,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PAS City of Medford Floodplain, OR ....................................................................... $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PAS Nehalem River ODOT Flood Mapping, OR ....................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PAS Portland Balanced Cut and Fill Study, OR ..................................................... $35,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PAS Toutle River Radio Tracking, OR ..................................................................... $30,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Allegheny Co Aquatic Assessment Study, PA ......................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Northern Allegheny Co Stormwater Mangt Study, PA ............................................. $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Pennsylvania Flood Inundation Mapping, PA .......................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SW PA Spill Response Study, PA ............................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... USS Yorktown, SC .................................................................................................... $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Kingsport Riverfront, TN .......................................................................................... $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... TN Dept of Env and Conserv Pilot Study—Wtr Res Tech ADVISORY Committee, 

TN.

$200,000 The President 

Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Charlottesville Water Quality Management, VA ...................................................... $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... James City Surry Non-Structural, VA ...................................................................... $35,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Virginia Department of Transportation, VA ............................................................. $114,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Williamsburg Stormwater Management, VA ........................................................... $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... South Burlington, VT ............................................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Clover Island—Port of Kenewick, WA ..................................................................... $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Elwha River, WA ...................................................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Half Moon Lake Alum Dosing Study, WI ................................................................. $30,000 The President 
200 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Internal Phosphorus Loading Assessment Study, Big Eau Pleine Flowage, WI ..... $31,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Oneida Nation Floodplain Delineation, WI .............................................................. $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... City of Ravenwood, WV ........................................................................................... $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Putnam County Drainage, WV ................................................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ................................................................................. ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT TRI-CADD .............................................. $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................... $6,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES ....................................................................................... $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... FLOOD DAMAGE DATA ....................................................................................................... $220,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES ............................................................................ $13,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Mobile District Hurricane Evacuation Studies, AL .................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Special Study—Crowdabout Creek, AL ................................................................... $81,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—SFHE Montgomery Al, Little Sandy Creek, AL ................................................. $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Beaver/Clear Creeks, Camp Verde, AZ ........................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Cochise County, AZ ......................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Gila River/Duncan, AZ .................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Hopi Tribe Floodplain Mapping, AZ ................................................................ $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Tohono O’odham Gu Vo Wash, AZ .................................................................. $95,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Tohono O’odham Nationwide Floodplain Maopping, AZ ................................. $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Humboldt County, CA Tsunami PAS, CA ................................................................. $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Raymond Basin Conjunctive Use Drought Study, CA ............................................. $125,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... San Mateo County, CA Levee Survey, CA ............................................................... $30,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Anaverde Creek Floodplain Delineation, CA ................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Soboba Band of Indians Flood Mapping, CA ................................................. $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Carbon County, CO .................................................................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Durango, LaPlata County, CO ................................................................................. $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Green River City, CO ............................................................................................... $80,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... La Plata County, CO ................................................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Mesa County, CO ..................................................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Flood/Hurricane Evacuation, DC .............................................................................. $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Savannah District Hurricane Evac Studies, GA ...................................................... $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—GA Clarksville Stream Survey, GA .................................................................. $20,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Anahola Flood Hazard Study, Kauai, HI .................................................................. $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Kaluanui Stream Flood Hazard Determination, Oahu, HI State Parks, DLNR ........ $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Nuuanu Reservoir Flood Study, HI .......................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Waimea River Zone A Flood Determination, Kauai, HI ........................................... $185,000 The President 
201 

Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Waiohuli Gulch Flood Hazard Study, Kula, Maui, HI .............................................. $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Evaluation of Flooding Scenarios, IA .............................................................. $120,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Regulated Frequency Curves .......................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Boulder Creek Donnelly, ID ............................................................................. $35,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Warm Springs Creek vic of Challis, ID .......................................................... $38,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Warm Springs Creek vic of Ketchum, ID ....................................................... $45,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—IL Levees Evaluation Support, IL .................................................................... $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Will County Survey, IL ............................................................................................. $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Nodaway County Bridge Study, KS .......................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Hurricane Evacuation Study, SE Louisiana Update Support Data ......................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—City of Gretna GIS, LA .................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—East Baton Rouge GIS, LA .............................................................................. $450,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Livingston Parish GIS, LA ............................................................................... $650,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Clay Pit Brook Flooding Study, MA ......................................................................... $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Hoosic River Flood Mitigation Study, Cheshire, MA ............................................... $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Saw Mill Brook Flood Study, Newton, MA ............................................................... $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Spear Brook Flood Control Study, Wilbraham, MA ................................................. $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Hurricane Evacuation Studies, MD ......................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... AuTrain River Scour Study, MI, MI .......................................................................... $71,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Floodplain Management Training, MO .................................................................... $30,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Lincoln County, MO ......................................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Jordan, MT ............................................................................................................... $80,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Nashua Flood Risk Assessment, MT ....................................................................... $55,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... North Carolina HES Restudy, NC ............................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Beaver & Black Brooks Flooding Study, Londerry, NH ........................................... $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Manalapan Brook, NJ ...................................................................................... $110,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Elbow Creek, NY ...................................................................................................... $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Forecast Studies, NY ............................................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Hurricane Evacuation Studies, NY .......................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Onondaga Creek, Syracuse, NY ............................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Special Study—Finger Lakes, NY ........................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... New Jersey—Port Authority Study Update, NY, NJ ................................................. $180,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Special Study—Crawford County, OH ..................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS City of John Day, OR .......................................................................................... $160,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS Crooked River FIS (City of Prineville), OR ......................................................... $140,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS Juniper Canyon FIS (City of Prineville), OR ....................................................... $137,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #1 (Gray’s River), OR ......................................................... $155,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #2 (Elochoman River), OR ................................................. $130,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #3 (Wilson Creek), OR ........................................................ $128,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS Wahkiakum Co FIS #4 (Skamokawa Creek), OR ............................................... $128,000 The President 
202 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Philadelphia Hurricane Evacuation Study, PA ........................................................ $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Southeastern, PA ..................................................................................................... $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Puerto Rico HES Behavior Study, PR ...................................................................... $112,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... South Carolina HES Restudy, SC ............................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—City of Gallatin, TN ......................................................................................... $85,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Unincorparated Weber Co., UT ................................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... City of Galax, VA ..................................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Town of Abingdon, VA ..................................................................................... $56,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Dam Break Studies, VT ........................................................................................... $31,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... East Long Pond Dam, VT ........................................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Lake Hardwick Dam, VT .......................................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Mackville Pond Dam, VT ......................................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Nichols Pond Dam, VT ............................................................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Rugg Brooks, St. Albans City, VT ........................................................................... $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Stevens Brooks, Town of St. Albans, VT ........................................................ $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS—Vermont, VT ..................................................................................................... $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Warren Lake Dam, VT .............................................................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS Lind Coulee, vicinity of Lind, WA ...................................................................... $35,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SS McCoy Creek, vicinity of Oakesdale, WA ........................................................... $67,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... Bear River Study—Uinta Co., WY ........................................................................... $140,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... HYDROLOGIC STUDIES ...................................................................................................... $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES ...................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE) ................................................ $225,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT .............................. $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS ...................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY) .................................................................. $600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS .............................................................................................. $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................. $25,392,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... OTHER—MISC ........................................................................................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................... $2,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW ............................................................................................ $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... NATIONAL SHORELINE ....................................................................................................... $375,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM ........................................................................................ $2,100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM ...................................................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ General Investigations .................... WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY ........................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—CG ...................................... Channel Improvement, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, NO, TH .................................................................. $47,721,000 The President 
203 

Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—CG ...................................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN ...................................................... $45,439,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—CG ...................................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA .......................................................................... $3,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—CG ...................................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA ........................................................................................................... $15,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—CG ...................................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA ................................................................................................. $2,250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—GI ....................................... ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA .................................................................................................. $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—GI ....................................... DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA .......................................................................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—GI ....................................... MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT STUDY, TN & MS ............................................ $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—GI ....................................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ................................................................................. $1,665,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN .......................................................... $67,350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR .................................................................................. .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR .................................................................................. $425,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR ............................................................................ $223,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR ............................................................................. $175,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN ...................................................... $11,708,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR .................................................................................................. $1,217,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL .................................................................................... $191,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY .................................................................................. $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA .......................................................................... $2,532,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA ........................................................................................................... $12,374,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA .............................................................................. $43,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA ................................................................................. $54,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... BONNET CARRE, LA ................................................................................................................... $3,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA ................................................................................... $1,716,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, CAERNARVON, LA ......................................................................... $1,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... OLD RIVER, LA ........................................................................................................................... $10,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA .......................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA ............................................................ $2,485,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA ............................................................................ $3,660,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS ......................................................................................................... $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS .................................................................................. $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS .......................................................................................................... $537,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS ........................................................................................ $6,870,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS .............................................................................. $2,400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS .................................................................................................. $7,640,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS ............................................................................................... $807,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS ........................................................................................... $7,381,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS ................................................................................................. $2,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS .............................................................................................. $9,183,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS ............................................................................................... $825,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS ............................................................... $400,000 The President 
204 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS .......................................................................... $544,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS ................................................................................................ $731,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO ................................................................................. $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO .................................................................................................. $9,843,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO ............................................................................................................. $5,416,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN .................................................................................. $45,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN .................................................................................. $1,417,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ MR&T—Maintenance ...................... MAPPING .................................................................................................................................... $1,112,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Abiquiu Dam, NM ...................................................................................................................... $3,305,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Alabama-Coosa Comprehensive Water Study, AL ..................................................................... $253,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Alabama River Lakes, AL .......................................................................................................... $16,785,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Alamo Lake, AZ ......................................................................................................................... $1,542,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Albeni Falls Dam, ID ................................................................................................................. $1,545,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Allatoona Lake, GA .................................................................................................................... $7,077,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Allegheny River, PA ................................................................................................................... $9,039,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Almond Lake, NY ....................................................................................................................... $524,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Alum Creek Lake, OH ................................................................................................................ $1,545,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ............................................................................................................. $659,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Anchorage Harbor, AK ............................................................................................................... $18,659,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, GA, AL & FL ................................................... $2,437,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Applegate Lake, OR ................................................................................................................... $1,302,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Aquilla Lake, TX ........................................................................................................................ $1,564,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Arcadia Lake, OK ....................................................................................................................... $521,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control—Area VIII, TX ................................................... $1,558,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Arkport Dam, NY ........................................................................................................................ $298,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ashtabula Harbor, OH ............................................................................................................... $1,840,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Assateague, MD ......................................................................................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf & Black, LA ....................................................... $11,640,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway—ACC, VA ................................................................................ $2,620,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway—DSC, VA ................................................................................ $1,311,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, GA .......................................................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, NC .......................................................................................... $4,300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, SC .......................................................................................... $1,295,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ........................................................................................................ $215,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC ....................................................................................... $1,898,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ball Mountain, VT ...................................................................................................................... $858,000 The President 
205 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Baltimore Harbor and Channel (50 Foot), MD .......................................................................... $20,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Baltimore Harbor, MD (Drift Removal) ...................................................................................... $360,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Barataria Bay Waterway, LA ..................................................................................................... $165,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Barbers Point Harbor, HI ........................................................................................................... $201,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bardwell Lake, TX ...................................................................................................................... $2,229,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Barkley Dam and Lake, Barkley, KY & TN ................................................................................ $10,393,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Barnegat Inlet, NJ ..................................................................................................................... $225,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Barre Falls Dam, MA ................................................................................................................. $753,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Barren River Lake, KY ............................................................................................................... $2,514,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA ..................................................................................................... $954,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump Waterway, LA .............................................................. $1,211,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bayou Pierre, LA ........................................................................................................................ $24,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA ................................................................................................... $49,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bayou Teche and Vermillion River, LA ...................................................................................... $15,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bayou Teche, LA ........................................................................................................................ $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bayport Ship Channel, TX ......................................................................................................... $4,968,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bear Creek Lake, CO ................................................................................................................. $395,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Beaver Lake, AR ........................................................................................................................ $8,864,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Beech Fork Lake, WV ................................................................................................................. $1,405,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Belton Lake, TX ......................................................................................................................... $3,280,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Beltzville Lake, PA ..................................................................................................................... $1,201,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Benbrook Lake, TX ..................................................................................................................... $2,575,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Berlin Lake, OH ......................................................................................................................... $2,198,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Big Bend Dam, Lake Sharpe, SD .............................................................................................. $9,873,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Big Sandy Harbor, KY ................................................................................................................ $1,710,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bigstone Lake—Whetstone River, MN & SD ............................................................................ $276,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Biloxi Harbor, MS ....................................................................................................................... $1,250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Birch Hill Dam, MA ................................................................................................................... $1,203,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Birch Lake, OK ........................................................................................................................... $902,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Black Butte Lake, CA ................................................................................................................ $2,234,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY .................................................................... $1,503,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Black Rock Lake, CT ................................................................................................................. $1,436,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................................................................. $24,180,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Blackwater Dam, NH ................................................................................................................. $610,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Blakely Mt Dam, Lake Ouachita, AR ......................................................................................... $7,079,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Blue Marsh Lake, PA ................................................................................................................. $2,696,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Blue Mountain Lake, AR ............................................................................................................ $1,914,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Blue River Lake, OR .................................................................................................................. $940,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bluestone Lake, WV ................................................................................................................... $1,661,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bonneville Lock & Dam, OR & WA ............................................................................................ $13,911,000 The President 
206 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Boston Harbor, MA .................................................................................................................... $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bowman Haley, ND .................................................................................................................... $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Brazos Island Harbor, TX .......................................................................................................... $3,388,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Broken Bow Lake, OK ................................................................................................................ $3,202,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Brookville Lake, IN ..................................................................................................................... $862,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Brunswick Harbor, GA ............................................................................................................... $7,156,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Buchanan Dam, HV Eastman Lake, CA .................................................................................... $2,041,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Buckhorn Lake, KY .................................................................................................................... $1,585,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Buffalo Bayou & Tributaries, TX ............................................................................................... $2,958,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Buffalo Harbor, NY .................................................................................................................... $1,325,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Buffumville Lake, MA ................................................................................................................ $836,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Buford Dam and Lake Sidney Lanier, GA ................................................................................. $8,924,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Bull Shoals Lake, AR ................................................................................................................. $14,484,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Burns Waterway Harbor, IN ....................................................................................................... $165,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Burnsville Lake, WV ................................................................................................................... $2,246,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Buttermilk Channel, NY ............................................................................................................. $1,760,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Caddo Lake, LA ......................................................................................................................... $224,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Caesar Creek Lake, OH ............................................................................................................. $1,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cagles Mill Lake, IN .................................................................................................................. $892,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Calcasieu River and Pass, LA ................................................................................................... $23,968,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Calumet Harbor and River, IL & IN .......................................................................................... $4,621,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Canaveral Harbor, FL ................................................................................................................ $4,600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Canton Lake, OK ........................................................................................................................ $2,217,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Canyon Lake, TX ........................................................................................................................ $4,005,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cape Cod Canal, MA ................................................................................................................. $13,263,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cape Fear River Above Wilmington, NC .................................................................................... $988,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ ..................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Carlyle Lake, IL .......................................................................................................................... $5,171,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Carr Creek Lake, KY .................................................................................................................. $1,737,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Carters Dam and Lake, GA ....................................................................................................... $8,318,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Caruthersville Harbor, MO ......................................................................................................... $800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cave Run Lake, KY .................................................................................................................... $926,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN .......................................................................................................... $1,027,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cedar Bayou, TX ........................................................................................................................ $1,790,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Center Hill Lake, TN .................................................................................................................. $6,143,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Central & Southern Florida, FL ................................................................................................. $23,876,000 The President 
207 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Channel To Harlingen, TX ......................................................................................................... $2,161,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Channel To Port Bolivar, TX ...................................................................................................... $383,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Channels in Lake St Clair, MI .................................................................................................. $1,636,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Charles River Natural Valley Storage Area, MA ........................................................................ $275,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Charleston Harbor, SC ............................................................................................................... $12,492,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Charlevoix Harbor, MI ................................................................................................................ $203,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chatfield Lake, CO .................................................................................................................... $1,442,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN ................................................................................................... $6,454,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chena River Lakes, AK .............................................................................................................. $2,816,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cherry Creek Lake, CO .............................................................................................................. $1,999,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chetco River, OR ....................................................................................................................... $909,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chicago Harbor, IL .................................................................................................................... $3,889,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chicago River, IL ....................................................................................................................... $493,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chickamauga Lock, Tennessee River, TN ................................................................................. $3,775,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chief Joseph Dam, WA .............................................................................................................. $790,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Chincoteague Inlet, VA .............................................................................................................. $913,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Lake, MO ................................................................... $6,813,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Clarence J. Brown Dam, OH ...................................................................................................... $1,145,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Clearwater Lake, MO ................................................................................................................. $3,018,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cleveland Harbor, OH ................................................................................................................ $8,357,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Clinton Lake, KS ........................................................................................................................ $2,073,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cochiti Lake, NM ....................................................................................................................... $6,876,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cold Brook Lake, SD .................................................................................................................. $436,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cold Spring Inlet, NJ ................................................................................................................. $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Colebrook River Lake, CT .......................................................................................................... $615,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Columbia & Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA & Portland, OR ........................... $24,495,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA & OR .................................................................................. $727,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Columbia River at the Mouth, OR & WA .................................................................................. $12,945,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Columbia River Between Chinook and Sand Island, WA .......................................................... $847,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA & the Dalles, OR ..................................................... $689,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Conant Brook Lake, MA ............................................................................................................. $210,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Conchas Lake, NM ..................................................................................................................... $1,796,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Conemaugh River Lake, PA ....................................................................................................... $1,253,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Conneaut Harbor, OH ................................................................................................................ $1,191,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ........................................................................................ $4,685,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Coos Bay, OR ............................................................................................................................. $5,043,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Copan Lake, OK ......................................................................................................................... $1,035,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Coquille River, OR ..................................................................................................................... $339,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Coralville Lake, IA ..................................................................................................................... $3,381,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir, TN ......................................................................................... $6,813,000 The President 
208 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX .............................................................................................. $4,523,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cottage Grove Lake, OR ............................................................................................................ $1,130,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cottonwood Springs Lake, SD ................................................................................................... $271,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cougar Lake, OR ....................................................................................................................... $1,582,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Council Grave Lake, KS ............................................................................................................. $1,739,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cowanesque Lake, PA ............................................................................................................... $1,889,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, CA .................................................................................. $3,829,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Crooked Creek Lake, PA ............................................................................................................ $1,683,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV .......................................................................................... $177,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Curwensville Lake, PA ............................................................................................................... $757,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dale Hollow Lake, TN ................................................................................................................ $6,386,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dardanelle Lock & Dam, AR ..................................................................................................... $9,754,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Deer Creek Lake, OH ................................................................................................................. $1,481,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ DeGray Lake, AR ........................................................................................................................ $7,003,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes Beach, DE ................................................. $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Delaware Lake, OH .................................................................................................................... $1,322,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Delaware River at Camden, NJ ................................................................................................. $15,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Delaware River, Philadelphia to the Sea, NJ, PA & DE ........................................................... $19,600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ ...................................................................... $820,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Denison Dam, Lake Texoma, TX & OK ...................................................................................... $7,676,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ DeQueen Lake, AR ..................................................................................................................... $1,752,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Detroit Lake, OR ........................................................................................................................ $949,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Detroit River, MI ........................................................................................................................ $5,415,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dewey Lake, KY ......................................................................................................................... $1,775,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dierks Lake, AR ......................................................................................................................... $1,360,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dillingham Harbor, AK ............................................................................................................... $885,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dillon Lake, OH .......................................................................................................................... $1,366,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Disposal Area Monitoring, ME ................................................................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dorena Lake, OR ........................................................................................................................ $1,160,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA ....................................................................... $5,139,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI ............................................................................................. $5,985,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Dworkshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ........................................................................................... $2,875,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ East Branch Clarion River Lake, PA ......................................................................................... $1,524,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ East Brimfield Lake, MA ........................................................................................................... $950,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ East Fork, Tombigbee River, MS ............................................................................................... $187,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ East Lynn Lake, WV ................................................................................................................... $2,167,000 The President 
209 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ East River, NY ........................................................................................................................... $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ East Rockaway Inlet, NY ........................................................................................................... $2,950,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ East Sidney Lake, NY ................................................................................................................ $588,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Eastchester Creek, NY ............................................................................................................... $4,090,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Eau Galle River Lake, WI .......................................................................................................... $888,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ediz Hook, WA ............................................................................................................................ $730,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ..................................................................................................... $560,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ El Dorado Lake, KS .................................................................................................................... $786,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Elk City Lake, KS ....................................................................................................................... $718,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Elkins, WV .................................................................................................................................. $15,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Elvis Stahr (Hickman) Harbor, KY ............................................................................................. $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Erie Harbor, PA .......................................................................................................................... $555,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, FL ........................................................................................... $56,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Estelline Springs Experimental Project, TX ............................................................................... $43,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Eufaula Lake, OK ....................................................................................................................... $6,620,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA ................................................................................ $1,766,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fall Creek Lake, OR ................................................................................................................... $1,864,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fall River Lake, KS .................................................................................................................... $1,283,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Falls Lake, NC ........................................................................................................................... $1,859,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Farm Creek Reservoirs, IL ......................................................................................................... $352,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Farmington Dam, CA ................................................................................................................. $481,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fern Ridge Lake, OR ................................................................................................................. $2,362,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fernandina Harbor, FL ............................................................................................................... $1,625,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ferrells Bridge Dam, Lake O’ the Pines, TX ............................................................................. $3,485,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY ........................................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fishtrap Lake, KY ...................................................................................................................... $2,171,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Flushing Bay and Creek, NY ..................................................................................................... $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fort Gibson Lake, OK ................................................................................................................. $11,768,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD ............................................................................... $12,210,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fort Supply Lake, OK ................................................................................................................. $1,104,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA .................................................................................................. $674,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, RI ................................................................................................. $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Fox River, WI .............................................................................................................................. $4,421,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Francis E Walter Dam, PA ......................................................................................................... $969,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Franklin Falls Dam, NH ............................................................................................................. $1,921,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Freeport Harbor, TX ................................................................................................................... $3,316,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Freshwater Bayou, LA ................................................................................................................ $2,235,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Friday Harbor, WA ...................................................................................................................... $111,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ft. Peck Dam and Lake, MT ...................................................................................................... $6,361,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Galisteo Dam, NM ..................................................................................................................... $591,000 The President 
210 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ........................................................................................... $13,095,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND ........................................................................................ $14,946,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA ..................................................................................... $2,323,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Gavins Point Dam, Lewis and Clark Lake, NE and SD ............................................................ $8,165,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ......................................................................... $224,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Georgetown Harbor, SC ............................................................................................................. $1,250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Gillham Lake, AR ....................................................................................................................... $1,366,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ GIWW, Channel to Victoria, TX .................................................................................................. $2,264,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ GIWW, Chocolate Bayou, TX ...................................................................................................... $1,733,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Grand Haven Harbor, MI ........................................................................................................... $820,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Granger Dam and Lake, TX ....................................................................................................... $2,588,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Grapevine Lake, TX .................................................................................................................... $2,735,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ...................................................................................... $11,140,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Grayson Lake, KY ....................................................................................................................... $1,709,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Great Kills Harbor, S.I., NY ....................................................................................................... $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Great Salt Plains Lake, OK ....................................................................................................... $347,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (New Harbor) ...................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Great South Bay, NY ................................................................................................................. $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Green and Barren Rivers, KY .................................................................................................... $1,880,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Green Bay Harbor, WI ................................................................................................................ $6,459,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Green Peter—Foster Lakes, OR ................................................................................................ $3,650,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Green River Lake, KY ................................................................................................................. $2,202,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Greers Ferry Lake, AR ................................................................................................................ $7,759,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, AL ................................................................................................. $5,735,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, LA ................................................................................................. $24,777,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX ................................................................................................. $26,046,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Gulfport Harbor, MS .................................................................................................................. $5,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hampton Rds, Norfolk and Newport News Harbor, VA (Drift Removal) ................................... $882,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hancock Brook Lake, CT ............................................................................................................ $442,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Harlan County Lake, NE ............................................................................................................ $2,312,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Harry S Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO ................................................................................. $9,393,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hartwell Lake, GA & SC ............................................................................................................ $11,999,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Helena Harbor, AR ..................................................................................................................... $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Heyburn Lake, OK ...................................................................................................................... $748,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hidden Dam, Hensley Lake, CA ................................................................................................. $2,170,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hills Creek Lake, OR ................................................................................................................. $843,000 The President 
211 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hillsdale Lake, KS ..................................................................................................................... $860,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hodges Village Dam, MA ........................................................................................................... $567,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Holland Harbor, MI .................................................................................................................... $2,151,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Homer Harbor, AK ...................................................................................................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Homme Lake, ND ....................................................................................................................... $252,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hop Brook Lake, CT ................................................................................................................... $917,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ..................................................................................................... $1,148,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hords Creek Lake, TX ................................................................................................................ $1,605,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Houma Navigation Canal, LA .................................................................................................... $2,569,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Houston Ship Channel, TX ........................................................................................................ $15,063,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Howard Hanson Dam, WA ......................................................................................................... $3,694,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hudson River Channel, NY ........................................................................................................ $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hudson River, NY (MAINT) ......................................................................................................... $1,270,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hudson River, NY (O & C) ........................................................................................................ $1,550,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hugo Lake, OK ........................................................................................................................... $1,738,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Hulah Lake, OK .......................................................................................................................... $2,097,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA .................................................................................................. $3,010,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ice Harbor Lock & Dam, WA ..................................................................................................... $5,828,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Illinois Waterway, IL & IN (MVR Portion) .................................................................................. $2,648,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Illinois Waterway, Il & IN (MVS Portion) ................................................................................... $31,736,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Indiana Harbor, Confined Disposal Facility, IN ........................................................................ $13,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Indiana Harbor, IN ..................................................................................................................... $2,330,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, GA .............................................................. $48,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, IL ................................................................ $65,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, OR .............................................................. $34,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, WA .............................................................. $74,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Environmental Projects, WV .............................................................. $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, AK .......................................................................................... $168,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, AR .......................................................................................... $673,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, AZ .......................................................................................... $199,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, CA .......................................................................................... $6,702,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, CO .......................................................................................... $773,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, CT .......................................................................................... $392,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, DC .......................................................................................... $140,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, FL ........................................................................................... $1,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, GA .......................................................................................... $108,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, HI ........................................................................................... $705,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, IA ........................................................................................... $483,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, ID ........................................................................................... $324,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, IL ........................................................................................... $1,298,000 The President 
212 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, IN ........................................................................................... $709,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, KS .......................................................................................... $220,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, KY .......................................................................................... $665,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, LA .......................................................................................... $1,487,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, MA ......................................................................................... $414,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, MD ......................................................................................... $155,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, ME ......................................................................................... $215,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, MI .......................................................................................... $158,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, MN ......................................................................................... $633,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, MO ......................................................................................... $1,491,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, MS ......................................................................................... $183,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, MT .......................................................................................... $115,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, NC .......................................................................................... $244,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, ND .......................................................................................... $452,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, NE .......................................................................................... $714,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, NH .......................................................................................... $126,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, NJ ........................................................................................... $205,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, NM ......................................................................................... $639,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, NV .......................................................................................... $63,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, NY .......................................................................................... $898,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, OH .......................................................................................... $555,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, OK .......................................................................................... $255,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, OR .......................................................................................... $636,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, PA .......................................................................................... $880,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, RI ........................................................................................... $48,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, SC .......................................................................................... $70,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, SD .......................................................................................... $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, TN .......................................................................................... $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, TX .......................................................................................... $1,520,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, UT .......................................................................................... $84,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, VA .......................................................................................... $369,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, VT .......................................................................................... $109,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, WA ......................................................................................... $725,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, WI .......................................................................................... $91,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, WV ......................................................................................... $336,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Inspection of Completed Works, WY ......................................................................................... $25,000 The President 
213 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ International Water Studies, ME ............................................................................................... $17,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL ......................................... $2,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware R to Chesapeake Bay, DE & MD ........................................ $28,390,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL .................................................................... $689,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Intracoastal Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE .................................................... $70,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Isabella Lake, CA ...................................................................................................................... $1,802,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, LA ............................................................................................ $13,598,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ J. Edward Roush Lake, IN ......................................................................................................... $944,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, TN ..................................................................................... $4,818,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ J. Strom Thurmond Lake, GA & SC ........................................................................................... $10,316,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jackson Hole Levees, WY ........................................................................................................... $877,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jacksonville Harbor, FL .............................................................................................................. $7,035,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jamaica Bay, NY ....................................................................................................................... $220,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ James River Channel, VA .......................................................................................................... $4,479,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ............................................................................................................ $756,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jennings Randolph Lake, MD & WV .......................................................................................... $1,779,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jim Chapman Lake, TX ............................................................................................................. $1,718,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Lake Seminole, FL, AL & GA ..................................................... $9,732,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Joe Pool Lake, TX ....................................................................................................................... $1,096,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ John Day Lock & Dam, OR & WA .............................................................................................. $8,901,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ John H. Kerr Lake, VA & NC ...................................................................................................... $11,585,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ John Martin Reservoir, CO ......................................................................................................... $2,554,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS .................................................................................... $3,685,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, VA ............................................................................. $2,104,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Johnstown, PA ............................................................................................................................ $34,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Jones Inlet, NY ........................................................................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Kanawha River Locks & Dam, WV ............................................................................................ $14,089,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Kanopolis Lake, KS .................................................................................................................... $2,288,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Kaskaskia River Navigation, IL ................................................................................................. $2,148,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Kaw Lake, OK ............................................................................................................................ $2,751,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Kentucky River, KY .................................................................................................................... $10,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Kewaunee Harbor, WI ................................................................................................................ $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Keweenaw Waterway, MI ........................................................................................................... $37,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Keystone Lake, OK ..................................................................................................................... $6,947,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA ................................................................................. $1,338,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Knightville Dam, MA .................................................................................................................. $1,421,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ LAC Qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN .............................................................................. $627,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, ND ..................................................................................... $1,351,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Kemp, TX ........................................................................................................................... $327,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Michigan Diversion, IL ...................................................................................................... $683,000 The President 
214 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Montauk Harbor, NY ......................................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Providence Harbor, LA ...................................................................................................... $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Shelbyville, IL .................................................................................................................... $5,454,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Traverse, SD & MN ........................................................................................................... $598,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ............................................................................................. $9,246,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Laurel River Lake, KY ................................................................................................................ $1,927,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lavon Lake, TX .......................................................................................................................... $3,497,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lewisville Dam, TX .................................................................................................................... $3,549,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Libby Dam, MT .......................................................................................................................... $1,948,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Little Blue River Lakes, MO ...................................................................................................... $845,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Little Goose Lock & Dam, WA ................................................................................................... $2,551,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY ..................................................................................................... $5,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Littleville Lake, MA .................................................................................................................... $889,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Long Branch Lake, MO .............................................................................................................. $949,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, NY .................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Long Island Sound DMMP, CT ................................................................................................... $2,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lookout Point Lake, OR ............................................................................................................. $2,766,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lorain Harbor, OH ...................................................................................................................... $880,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA .................................................................................... $4,597,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lost Creek Lake, OR .................................................................................................................. $3,636,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, NJ ...................................................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lower Granite Lock & Dam, WA ................................................................................................ $7,651,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lower Monumental Lock & Dam, WA ........................................................................................ $6,735,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Loyalhanna Lake, PA ................................................................................................................. $1,346,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lucky Peak Lake, ID .................................................................................................................. $2,597,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Lynnhaven Inlet, VA ................................................................................................................... $277,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Madison Parish Port, LA ............................................................................................................ $99,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mahoning Creek Lake, PA ......................................................................................................... $1,286,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Manasquan River, NJ ................................................................................................................ $160,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ........................................................................................................ $861,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC .................................................................................................. $3,945,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Marion Lake, KS ........................................................................................................................ $1,820,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Martins Fork Lake, KY ............................................................................................................... $814,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Martis Creek Lake, CA & NV ..................................................................................................... $1,192,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Masonboro Inlet and Connecting Channels, NC ....................................................................... $2,300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Massillon Local Protection Project, OH ..................................................................................... $37,000 The President 
215 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Matagorda Ship Channel, TX .................................................................................................... $4,627,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mattituck Harbor, NY ................................................................................................................. $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR ........................................................... $40,016,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK ........................................................... $6,173,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ McNary Lock & Dam, OR & WA ................................................................................................ $7,137,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Melvern Lake, KS ....................................................................................................................... $2,151,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Merced County Streams, CA ...................................................................................................... $451,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mermentau River, LA ................................................................................................................. $1,913,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, OH ............................................................................... $1,089,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Pro ...................................................... $3,150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Middlesboro Cumberland River Basin, KY ................................................................................ $113,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Milford Lake, KS ........................................................................................................................ $2,057,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mill Creek Lake, WA .................................................................................................................. $3,834,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Millwood Lake, AR ..................................................................................................................... $5,122,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Minnesota River, MN ................................................................................................................. $256,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mispillion River, DE ................................................................................................................... $30,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississinewa Lake, IN ............................................................................................................... $974,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississippi Flood Control, OH ................................................................................................... $1,727,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis (MVP Portion), MN ..................... $44,130,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis (MVR Portion), IL ....................... $58,714,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississippi River BTWN Missouri River and Minneapolis (MVS Portion), IL ............................ $22,227,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississippi River btwn the Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Reg Works), MO & IL ......................... $23,403,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississippi River Outlets at Venice, LA .................................................................................... $2,838,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA ...................................................... $54,994,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Missouri River—Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA .............................................................. $129,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Missouri River—Rulo to the Mouth, IA, KS, MO & NE ............................................................ $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Missouri River—Sioux City to Rulo, IA, KS, MO & NE ............................................................. $2,610,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mobile Harbor, AL ...................................................................................................................... $23,996,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mojave River Dam, CA .............................................................................................................. $288,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Monongahela River, PA ............................................................................................................. $16,758,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Monroe Lake, IN ......................................................................................................................... $1,101,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Morehead City Harbor, NC ......................................................................................................... $9,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Moriches Inlet, NY ..................................................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Morro Bay Harbor, CA ................................................................................................................ $3,300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mosquito Creek Lake, OH .......................................................................................................... $995,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mount Morris Dam, NY .............................................................................................................. $2,696,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mouth of Yazoo River, MS ......................................................................................................... $112,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ....................................................................................... $279,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mud Mountain Dam, WA ........................................................................................................... $3,056,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Murderkill River, DE .................................................................................................................. $30,000 The President 
216 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Muskingum River Lakes, OH ..................................................................................................... $7,306,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Mystic River, CT ........................................................................................................................ $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Narrows Dam, Lake Greeson, AR .............................................................................................. $5,005,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Narrows of Lake Champlain, VT & NY ...................................................................................... $85,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Navarro Mills Lake, TX .............................................................................................................. $4,168,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Neah Bay, WA ............................................................................................................................ $67,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor, MA .................................................................................. $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New Bedford Fairhaven and Acushnet Hurricane Barrier, MA ................................................. $619,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New Hogan Lake, CA ................................................................................................................. $2,515,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, NJ ...................................................................................... $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New Madrid Harbor (Mile 889), MO .......................................................................................... $240,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New Madrid Harbor, MO ............................................................................................................ $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New Melones Lake, Downstream Channel, CA ......................................................................... $1,898,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New River Inlet, NC ................................................................................................................... $700,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New York and New Jersey Channels, NY .................................................................................. $4,100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New York Harbor, NY ................................................................................................................. $3,698,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New York Harbor, NY & NJ (Drift Removal) .............................................................................. $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ New York Harbor, NY & NJ (Prevention of Obstructive Deposits) ............................................ $1,045,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, NJ .................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Newport Bay Harbor, CA ............................................................................................................ $1,780,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Newtown Creek, NY ................................................................................................................... $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Nimrod Lake, AR ........................................................................................................................ $2,289,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Nolin Lake, KY ........................................................................................................................... $2,477,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Nome Harbor, AK ....................................................................................................................... $820,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Norfolk Harbor, VA ..................................................................................................................... $11,343,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Norfork Lake, AR ........................................................................................................................ $5,717,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ North Branch Kokosing River Lake, OH .................................................................................... $274,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA ......................................................................................... $630,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ North Hartland Lake, VT ............................................................................................................ $772,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown, TX .................................................................. $2,382,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ North Springfield Lake, VT ........................................................................................................ $854,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Northfield Brook Lake, CT ......................................................................................................... $610,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ O C Fisher Dam and Lake, TX .................................................................................................. $1,164,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Oahe Dam, Lake Oahe, SD & ND .............................................................................................. $11,816,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Oakland Harbor, CA ................................................................................................................... $9,255,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Oceanside Harbor, CA ............................................................................................................... $1,500,000 The President 
217 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ohio River Locks and Dams, KY, IL, IN & OH .......................................................................... $40,748,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ohio River Locks and Dams, PA, OH & WV .............................................................................. $21,470,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ohio River Locks and Dams, WV, KY & OH .............................................................................. $35,276,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ohio River Open Channel Work, KY, IL, IN & OH ..................................................................... $5,836,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ohio River Open Channel Work, PA, OH & WV ......................................................................... $516,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ohio River Open Channel Work, WV, KY & OH ......................................................................... $2,996,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Okatibbee Lake, MS ................................................................................................................... $1,703,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Okeechobee Waterway, FL ......................................................................................................... $2,357,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN ................................................................................................. $12,304,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ontonagon Harbor, MI ............................................................................................................... $1,122,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Oologah Lake, OK ...................................................................................................................... $4,106,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Optima Lake, OK ....................................................................................................................... $219,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Orwell Lake, MN ........................................................................................................................ $533,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Osceola Harbor, AR ................................................................................................................... $800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Otter Brook Lake, NH ................................................................................................................. $553,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA .................................................................................... $9,605,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam, AR ........................................................................................... $5,725,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Paint Creek Lake, OH ................................................................................................................ $1,216,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Painted Rock Dam, AZ .............................................................................................................. $1,320,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Paintsville Lake, KY ................................................................................................................... $1,231,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Palm Beach Harbor, FL ............................................................................................................. $3,225,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Panama City Harbor, FL ............................................................................................................ $2,055,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Papillion Creek, NE .................................................................................................................... $847,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pascagoula Harbor, MS ............................................................................................................. $10,900,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Passaic River Flood Warning System, NJ .................................................................................. $553,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pat Mayse Lake, TX ................................................................................................................... $1,208,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Patoka Lake, IN ......................................................................................................................... $887,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pearl River, MS & LA ................................................................................................................ $193,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pearson-Skubitz Bill Hill Lake, KS ............................................................................................ $1,472,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pensacola Harbor, FL ................................................................................................................ $67,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pensacola Reservoir, Lake of the Cherokees, OK ..................................................................... $114,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Perry Lake, KS ........................................................................................................................... $2,015,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Philpott Lake, VA & NC ............................................................................................................. $5,638,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pine and Mathews Canyons Lakes, NV ..................................................................................... $341,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pine Creek Lake, OK .................................................................................................................. $1,276,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pine Flat Lake, CA ..................................................................................................................... $3,201,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pipestem Lake, ND .................................................................................................................... $496,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Plymouth Harbor, MA ................................................................................................................. $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Point Judith Harbor of Refuge, RI ............................................................................................. $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pomme De Terre Lake, MO ........................................................................................................ $2,231,000 The President 
218 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Pomona Lake, KS ....................................................................................................................... $2,047,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ponce De Leon Inlet, FL ............................................................................................................ $600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Poplar Island, MD ...................................................................................................................... $8,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Port Chester Harbor, NY ............................................................................................................ $60,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Port Orford, OR .......................................................................................................................... $38,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, NH ......................................................................... $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Potomac and Anacostia River, DC (Drift Removal) .................................................................. $805,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Presque Isle Harbor, MI ............................................................................................................. $335,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Proctor Lake, TX ........................................................................................................................ $2,324,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, AK ................................................................................................... $930,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, AL ................................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, CA ................................................................................................... $2,442,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, CT ................................................................................................... $1,050,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, DC ................................................................................................... $30,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, DE ................................................................................................... $105,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, FL .................................................................................................... $1,300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, GA ................................................................................................... $151,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, HI .................................................................................................... $570,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, IL .................................................................................................... $104,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, IN .................................................................................................... $185,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, LA ................................................................................................... $65,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, MA .................................................................................................. $1,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, MD .................................................................................................. $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, ME .................................................................................................. $750,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, MI ................................................................................................... $410,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, MN .................................................................................................. $82,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, MS .................................................................................................. $75,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, NC ................................................................................................... $295,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, NH ................................................................................................... $275,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, NJ .................................................................................................... $1,653,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, NY ................................................................................................... $2,123,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, OH ................................................................................................... $295,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, OR ................................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, PA ................................................................................................... $120,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, RI .................................................................................................... $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, SC ................................................................................................... $465,000 The President 
219 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, TX ................................................................................................... $223,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, VA ................................................................................................... $850,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, WA .................................................................................................. $524,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Project Condition Surveys, WI ................................................................................................... $283,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Prompton Lake, PA .................................................................................................................... $434,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Puget Sound and Tributary Waters, WA .................................................................................... $1,011,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Punxsutawney, PA ...................................................................................................................... $22,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Quillayute River, WA .................................................................................................................. $266,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ R D Bailey Lake, WV ................................................................................................................. $1,927,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-off, NJ .................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Raritan River, NJ ....................................................................................................................... $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rathbun Lake, IA ....................................................................................................................... $3,019,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ray Roberts Lake, TX ................................................................................................................ $1,324,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Raystown Lake, PA .................................................................................................................... $3,847,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Red Lake Reservoir, MN ............................................................................................................ $150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Red Rock Dam and Lake, Red Rock, IA ................................................................................... $4,567,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Redwood City Harbor ................................................................................................................. $6,745,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Removal of Aquatic Growth, FL ................................................................................................ $4,445,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA ................................................................................................ $1,410,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Removal of Aquatic Growth, VA ................................................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rend Lake, IL ............................................................................................................................ $5,386,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ................................................................ $3,398,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Richard B Russell Dam & Lake, GA & SC ............................................................................... $9,209,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Richmond Harbor, CA ................................................................................................................ $9,589,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Robert S. Keer Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK .................................................................... $8,441,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rochester Harbor, NY ................................................................................................................ $5,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rogue River at Gold Beach, OR ................................................................................................ $565,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rollinson Channel, NC .............................................................................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rosedale Harbor, MS ................................................................................................................. $600,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Roseville Local Protection Project, OH ...................................................................................... $35,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rough River Lake, KY ................................................................................................................ $2,742,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Rudee Inlet, VA .......................................................................................................................... $795,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX .................................................................................................... $13,399,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sacramento River (30 Foot Project), CA ................................................................................... $3,351,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sacramento River and Tributaries (Debris Control), CA .......................................................... $1,712,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sacramento River Shallow Draft Channel, CA .......................................................................... $234,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Saginaw River, MI ..................................................................................................................... $3,624,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Salamonie Lake, IN ................................................................................................................... $904,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Salem River, NJ ......................................................................................................................... $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE ................................................................................................. $1,079,000 The President 
220 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX ...................................................................................... $6,247,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ San Francisco Bay, Delta Model Structure, CA ........................................................................ $1,118,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ San Francisco Harbor and Bay, CA (Drift Removal) ................................................................ $2,945,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ San Francisco Harbor, CA ......................................................................................................... $3,237,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ San Joaquin River, Port of Stockton, CA .................................................................................. $3,554,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ San Juan Harbor, PR ................................................................................................................. $1,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA .............................................................................. $2,650,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sandusky Harbor, OH ................................................................................................................ $1,465,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Santa Ana River Basin, CA ....................................................................................................... $3,094,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Santa Barbara Harbor, CA ........................................................................................................ $1,690,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ............................................................................................... $1,099,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sardis Lake, OK ......................................................................................................................... $1,254,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Savannah Harbor, GA ................................................................................................................ $15,087,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Savannah River Below Augusta, GA ......................................................................................... $574,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Saylorville Lake, IA .................................................................................................................... $5,032,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, AZ ........................................................................................ $31,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, CA ........................................................................................ $1,915,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, CO ....................................................................................... $612,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, FL ........................................................................................ $30,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, ID ......................................................................................... $484,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, KS ........................................................................................ $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, MD ....................................................................................... $108,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, MO ....................................................................................... $327,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, MT ....................................................................................... $145,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, ND ....................................................................................... $138,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, NM ....................................................................................... $477,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, OK ........................................................................................ $900,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, OR ....................................................................................... $69,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, PA ........................................................................................ $59,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, SD ........................................................................................ $81,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, TX ........................................................................................ $149,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, UT ........................................................................................ $594,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, WA ....................................................................................... $537,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Scheduling Reservoir Operations, WY ....................................................................................... $118,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Schuylkill River, PA ................................................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Seattle Harbor, WA .................................................................................................................... $172,000 The President 
221 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sebewaing River, MI .................................................................................................................. $1,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Shark River, NJ .......................................................................................................................... $400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Shenango River Lake, PA .......................................................................................................... $6,992,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Shinnecock Inlet, NY ................................................................................................................. $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, NJ ...................................................................................... $80,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Silver Lake Harbor, NC .............................................................................................................. $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Siuslaw River, OR ...................................................................................................................... $647,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Skiatook Lake, OK ...................................................................................................................... $1,414,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Skipanon Channel, OR .............................................................................................................. $6,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Smithville Lake, MO .................................................................................................................. $1,850,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Somerville Lake, TX ................................................................................................................... $3,366,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Souris River, ND ........................................................................................................................ $286,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Southern New York Flood Control Projects, NY ......................................................................... $807,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ St. Clair River, MI ..................................................................................................................... $533,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ St. Joseph Harbor, MI ................................................................................................................ $755,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ St. Marys River, MI .................................................................................................................... $23,010,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ St. Lucie Inlet, Fl ....................................................................................................................... $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Stamford Hurricane Barrier, CT ................................................................................................ $434,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Stillaguamish River, WA ............................................................................................................ $165,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ........................................................................................................ $2,096,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Stillwater Lake, PA .................................................................................................................... $452,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Stockton Lake, MO ..................................................................................................................... $4,370,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV ..................................................................................................... $1,148,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sturgeon Bay Harbor and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI ....................................................... $20,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Success Lake, CA ...................................................................................................................... $1,989,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Suisun Bay Channel, CA ........................................................................................................... $4,019,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Summersville Lake, WV ............................................................................................................. $3,234,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surry Mountain Lake, NH .......................................................................................................... $760,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, IL .......................................................................... $685,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, IN ......................................................................... $126,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, MI ......................................................................... $2,612,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, MN ........................................................................ $359,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, ND ........................................................................ $35,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, NY ........................................................................ $579,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, OH ........................................................................ $234,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, OR ........................................................................ $10,400,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, PA ......................................................................... $98,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, WA ........................................................................ $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters, WI ......................................................................... $388,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Sutton Lake, WV ........................................................................................................................ $2,413,000 The President 
222 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Table Rock Lake, MO & AR ....................................................................................................... $7,550,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ..................................................................................................... $130,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tampa Harbor, FL ...................................................................................................................... $5,620,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Taylorsville Lake, KY .................................................................................................................. $1,104,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK ............................................................................................................. $6,625,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tennessee River, TN .................................................................................................................. $16,833,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS ................................................ $2,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS ............................................................................... $25,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Terminus Dam, Lake Kaweah, CA ............................................................................................. $2,037,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Texas City Ship Channel, TX ..................................................................................................... $4,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Texas Water Allocation Assessment, TX .................................................................................... $1,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ The Dalles Lock & Dam, WA & OR ........................................................................................... $8,769,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Thomaston Dam, CT .................................................................................................................. $1,136,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ....................................................................................................... $48,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ....................................................................................................... $2,456,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tionesta Lake, PA ...................................................................................................................... $1,812,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Toledo Harbor, OH ..................................................................................................................... $6,034,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tom Jenkins Dam, OH ............................................................................................................... $894,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Toronto Lake, KS ........................................................................................................................ $3,522,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Town Bluff Dam, B A Steinhagen Lake, TX .............................................................................. $2,505,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Townshend Lake, VT .................................................................................................................. $814,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Trinidad Lake, CO ...................................................................................................................... $960,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tully Lake, MA ........................................................................................................................... $666,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tuttle Creek Lake, KS ................................................................................................................ $2,062,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Two Harbors, MN ....................................................................................................................... $350,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Two Rivers Dam, NM ................................................................................................................. $404,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Tygart Lake, WV ......................................................................................................................... $1,478,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Umpqua River, OR ..................................................................................................................... $1,174,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Union City Lake, PA ................................................................................................................... $440,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Union Lake, MO ......................................................................................................................... $6,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Union Village Dam, VT .............................................................................................................. $627,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Upper Rio Grande Water Operations Model Study, NM ............................................................ $4,188,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Ventura Harbor, CA ................................................................................................................... $6,426,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC ...................................................................................... $3,421,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Waco Lake, TX ........................................................................................................................... $3,711,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wallace Lake, LA ....................................................................................................................... $244,000 The President 
223 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wallisville Lake, TX ................................................................................................................... $2,114,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA ............................................................................... $8,972,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Washington Harbor, DC ............................................................................................................. $25,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Water/Environmental Certification, AL ...................................................................................... $76,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Water/Environmental Certification, FL ...................................................................................... $380,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Water/Environmental Certification, MS ..................................................................................... $66,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Water/Environmental Certification, VA ...................................................................................... $104,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Waterway from Empire to the Gulf, LA ..................................................................................... $47,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA ..................................................... $48,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Waterway on the Coast of Virginia, VA .................................................................................... $201,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Waukegan Harbor, IL ................................................................................................................. $492,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Waurika Lake, OK ...................................................................................................................... $1,431,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Webbers Falls Lock & Dam, OK ................................................................................................ $5,903,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ............................................................................................. $745,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ West Hill Dam, MA .................................................................................................................... $572,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ West Point Dam and Lake, GA & AL ........................................................................................ $9,591,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ West Thompson Lake, CT .......................................................................................................... $569,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Westchester Creek, NY .............................................................................................................. $100,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Westville Lake, MA .................................................................................................................... $784,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ White River, AR ......................................................................................................................... $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Whitlow Ranch Dam, AZ ........................................................................................................... $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Whitney Lake, TX ....................................................................................................................... $8,348,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Whitney Point Lake, NY ............................................................................................................. $685,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wicomico River, MD ................................................................................................................... $1,676,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ................................................................................. $918,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Willamette River Bank Protection, OR ...................................................................................... $41,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Willapa River and Harbor, WA .................................................................................................. $40,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ William H. Harsha Lake, OH ..................................................................................................... $1,029,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Willow Creek Lake, OR .............................................................................................................. $629,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wilmington Harbor, DE .............................................................................................................. $2,320,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wilmington Harbor, NC .............................................................................................................. $12,155,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wilson Lake, KS ......................................................................................................................... $2,017,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wister Lake, OK ......................................................................................................................... $856,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wolf Creek Dam, Lake Cumberland, KY .................................................................................... $7,835,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wolf River Harbor, TN ................................................................................................................ $373,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Woodcock Creek Lake, PA .......................................................................................................... $1,041,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Woonsocket, RI .......................................................................................................................... $200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ........................................................................................... $3,517,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Yaquina Bay & Harbor, OR ....................................................................................................... $1,790,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Yatesville Lake, KY .................................................................................................................... $1,143,000 The President 
224 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Yazoo River, MS ......................................................................................................................... $154,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Yellow Bend Port, AR ................................................................................................................ $115,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ York Indian Rock Dam, PA ........................................................................................................ $478,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Youghiogheny River Lake, PA & MD ......................................................................................... $2,335,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Yuba River, CA .......................................................................................................................... $146,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ Operation and Maintenance Items Not Listed Under States ................................................... ..........................Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ...................................... $5,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH ................................................................................. $690,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ........................................... $4,750,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M BUSINESS LINES .................................................. $6,792,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM ...................................................................................... $3,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT REQUIRING SPECIFIC LEGISLATION ....................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204/145) ...................................... $10,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONAL MITIGATION PROJECTS (SECTION 111) ............................................................ $9,043,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS PROJECTS ............................................................ $2,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION) ........................................................................... $2,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE ..................................................................................... $12,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE ......................................................................................... $12,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM .......................................... $1,150,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (DOER) .................................... $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM (DOTS) ............................................ $2,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM ........................................................................ $270,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ FACILITY PROTECTION ................................................................................................................ $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ FERC HYDROPOWER COORDINATION ......................................................................................... $3,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ FISH AND WILDLIFEOPERATING FISH HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT .......................................... $4,700,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL ........................................................................... $1,200,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS .................................................................................. $3,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS ......................................................................................... $1,780,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ LONG-TERM OPTION ASSESSMENT FOR LOW USE NAVIGATION ................................................ $1,500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTS ............................................................... $1,800,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM ................................................................................... $12,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM ............................................................................................ $18,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM [NEPP] ...................................................... $7,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY ...................................................................................... $10,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONAL (MULTI PROJECT) NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ........................ $4,230,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REALLOCATION ......................................................... $571,000 The President 
225 

Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ NATIONWIDE EVALUATION OF HYDROPOWER REHAB ................................................................. $2,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT [ABS–P2, WINABS] ........................................ $300,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION ..................................................................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS ....................................................................................... $500,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ PROTECT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN CHANNELS (SEC 3) ................................................. $50,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS ............................................................................. $4,771,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION .............................................................. $825,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ RECREATION ONE STOP [R1S] NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVATION ..................................... $65,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM ............................................ $5,000,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR REHAB ................................................................ $608,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ RESERVE FOR KEY EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIRS ......................................................... .......................... The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ SHORELINE USE PERMIT STUDY ................................................................................................ $250,000 The President Corps of Engineers ........................ Operation and Maintenance ............ WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT [WOTS] ................................................................... $653,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. California Bay-Delta Restoration .... CALFED ...................................................................................................................................... $41,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT ................................................................ $10,600,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT ....................................................................................................... $54,188,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ARBUCKLE PROJECT .................................................................................................................. $234,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT .............................................................................. $1,400,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... BALMORHEA PROJECT ................................................................................................................ $58,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... BOISE AREA PROJECTS .............................................................................................................. $5,401,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... CACHUMA PROJECT ................................................................................................................... $1,674,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .................................................................................... $500,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT ................................................... $1,400,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT ........................................................................................................ $217,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... CARLSBAD PROJECT .................................................................................................................. $3,719,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS ...................................................................................................... ..........................Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION ............................................................................................... $9,576,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT ......................................................................................... $1,663,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... DELTA DIVISION ................................................................................................................ $20,405,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... EAST SIDE DIVISION .......................................................................................................... $4,426,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... FRIANT DIVISION ............................................................................................................... $6,256,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS ............................................................................. $11,796,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT ............................................. $25,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION .......................................................................................... $16,896,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN FELIPE DIVISION ........................................................................................................ $1,651,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION ..................................................................................................... $7,356,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SHASTA DIVISION .............................................................................................................. $8,054,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... TRINITY RIVER DIVISION ................................................................................................... $10,495,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS ..................................................................................... $9,280,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT ................................................................. $8,525,000 The President 
226 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................ $450,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLLBRAN PROJECT .................................................................................................................. $3,885,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ..................................................................................... $300,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO RIVER BASIN, CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT ............................................................ $18,408,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM .............................................................. $2,350,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT ........................................................................................ $13,800,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT FCRPS ESA IMP ........................ $18,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT ........................................................................................................ $16,454,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... CROOKED RIVER PROJECT ......................................................................................................... $839,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... DESCHUTES PROJECT ................................................................................................................ $982,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... EASTERN NEW MEXICO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .................................................................. $50,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS .................................................................................................... $845,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... FORT PECK DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM .................................................................... $14,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT .................................................................................................. $259,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT ............................................................................................... $8,650,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II .................................................................................... $1,477,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY .............................................................................................. $125,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT .......................................................................................................... $1,865,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... HUNTLEY PROJECT ..................................................................................................................... $87,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... HYRUM PROJECT ........................................................................................................................ $198,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ............................................................................................ $300,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM ........................................................ $5,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .......................................................................................... $25,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... KENDRICK PROJECT ................................................................................................................... $3,258,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... KLAMATH DAM REMOVAL STUDY ............................................................................................... $2,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... KLAMATH PROJECT ..................................................................................................................... $25,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT ........................................................................................................ $7,276,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM .................................................................................. $2,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS ........................................................................................... $2,602,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY ................................................................................... $2,965,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM ............................................................................... $16,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS .............................................................................................. $1,264,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT ............................................ $1,400,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................... $700,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LOWER COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ........................................................................ $250,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION PROGRAM ......................... $2,050,000 The President 
227 

Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT ................................................................................................ $547,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MANCOS PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... $178,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MCGEE CREEK PROJECT ............................................................................................................ $664,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT ....................................................................................... $15,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT .................................................................................................. $23,910,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MILK RIVER PROJECT ................................................................................................................. $1,800,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MILK RIVER/ST. MARY DIVERSION REHABILITATION PROJECT ................................................... $4,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS ........................................................................................................ $7,168,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT ............................................................................................................ $135,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MNI WICONI PROJECT ................................................................................................................ $37,480,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS ........................................................................................................ $140,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MOON LAKE PROJECT ................................................................................................................ $80,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT ......................................................................................................... $525,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ............................................................................. $200,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NEWTON PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... $98,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NORMAN PROJECT ..................................................................................................................... $477,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NORTH PLATTE PROJECT ............................................................................................................ $1,617,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ...................................................................... $350,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ........................................................................... $700,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NUECES RIVER PROJECT ........................................................................................................... $741,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... OGDEN RIVER PROJECT ............................................................................................................. $390,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ..................................................................................... $150,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ......................................................................................... $450,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ORLAND PROJECT ...................................................................................................................... $703,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II ................................................................................ $2,346,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT ....................................................................... $209,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM ................................................................................ $2,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT .................................................................... $200,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN—GARRISON DIVERSION ............................................................ $70,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PINE RIVER PROJECT ................................................................................................................. $346,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PROVO RIVER PROJECT ............................................................................................................. $1,435,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... RAPID VALLEY PROJECT ............................................................................................................. $79,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... RIO GRANDE PROJECT ............................................................................................................... $4,999,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM ........................................... $16,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION ..................................................................... $1,345,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SALT RIVER PROJECT ................................................................................................................. $650,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT ............................................................................................. $400,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN ANGELO PROJECT ............................................................................................................... $436,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT ............................................................ $325,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION PROGRAM .................................................................. $3,500,000 The President 
228 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

Agency Account Project title Funding Member 

Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT ................................................................................................... $1,400,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM ................................................ $208,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ................................................................. $150,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT ....................................................................................................... $4,880,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL ................................................................................................ $1,160,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SCOFIELD PROJECT .................................................................................................................... $187,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SHOSHONE PROJECT .................................................................................................................. $1,156,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOBABO WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT PROJECT ....................................................................... $10,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOLANO PROJECT ....................................................................................................................... $4,109,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ............................................................. $1,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT ............................................ $1,703,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ................................................................. $520,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOUTHERN NEVADA/UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM .............................................................. $25,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INV. PROGRAM ............................................................. $150,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ........................................................................... $225,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT ................................................................................................. $269,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SUN RIVER PROJECT .................................................................................................................. $378,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ............................................................................................ $45,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... TUALATIN PROJECT .................................................................................................................... $339,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... TUCUMCARI PROJECT ................................................................................................................ $41,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... UMATILLA PROJECT .................................................................................................................... $4,310,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT ........................................................................................................... $368,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM .................................................................... $250,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................ $75,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... VENTURA RIVER PROJECT .......................................................................................................... $592,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT ............................................................................................................... $458,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS ................................................................................................... $208,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM ................................................................................. $150,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WASHITA BASIN PROJECT .......................................................................................................... $1,055,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WEBER BASIN PROJECT ............................................................................................................. $2,492,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WEBER RIVER PROJECT ............................................................................................................. $159,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WICHITA PROJECT-CHENEY DIVISION ......................................................................................... $405,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WICHITA PROJECT-EQUUS BEDS DIVISION ................................................................................. $2,050,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... YAKIMA PROJECT ....................................................................................................................... $8,512,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT ............................................................ $10,000,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... YUMA AREA PROJECTS .............................................................................................................. $24,500,000 The President 
229 

Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES ................................................ ..........................Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE I ............................................. $11,450,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM, TITLE II ............................................ $6,970,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, (CRSP), SECTION 5 ..................................................................... $8,337,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, (CRSP), SECTION 8 ..................................................................... $2,710,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ................................................. $233,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... DAM SAFETY PROGRAM ............................................................................................................. .......................... The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM .............................................................................. $2,029,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION .................................................................................. $81,600,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS ............................................................................. $18,250,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ........................................................................ $488,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM ..................................................... $1,432,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM ............................................. $19,012,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES ................................................. $2,187,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................... $947,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES .................................................................................. $7,675,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM ....................................................................... $1,400,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES .................................................................................................... $2,213,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ............................................................................. $8,682,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM ................................................................... $22,128,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS ....................................................................... $777,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM ...................................................................................... $6,197,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING ........................................................ $1,563,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .............................................................................. $1,651,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN—OTHER PICK SLOAN ................................................................ $39,526,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... POWER PROGRAM SERVICES ..................................................................................................... $1,031,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM ................................................................................... $753,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................................ $2,199,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ................................................. $1,625,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................. .......................... The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM ...................................................... $3,733,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ............................................................................ $10,200,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... RURAL WATER LEGISLATION, TITLE I ......................................................................................... $2,348,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... SITE SECURITY ........................................................................................................................... $28,877,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM .......................................................... $2,500,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL SUPPORT ............................................ $96,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM ................................................................. $6,510,000 The President Bureau of Reclamation ................. Water and Related Resources ......... WATER CONSERVATION INITIATIVE ............................................................................................. $22,192,000 The President 
230 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2009 appropriation Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation 

Senate Committee recommendation 

compared with (∂ or ¥) 

2009 

appropriation Budget estimate 

TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Corps of Engineers—Civil 

Investigations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 168,100 100,000 170,000 ∂1,900 ∂70,000 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 25,000 .......................... .......................... ¥25,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Investigations .......................................................................................................................................... 193,100 100,000 170,000 ¥23,100 ∂70,000 

Construction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2,141,677 1,718,000 1,924,000 ¥217,677 ∂206,000 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110–252) ...................................................................................................... 2,835,000 .......................... .......................... ¥2,835,000 ..........................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 2,000,000 .......................... .......................... ¥2,000,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Construction ............................................................................................................................................ 6,976,677 1,718,000 1,924,000 ¥5,052,677 ∂206,000 

Mississippi River and tributaries ......................................................................................................................................... 383,823 248,000 340,000 ¥43,823 ∂92,000 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 375,000 .......................... .......................... ¥375,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Mississippi River and tributaries ........................................................................................................... 758,823 248,000 340,000 ¥418,823 ∂92,000 

Operations and maintenance ............................................................................................................................................... 2,201,900 2,504,000 2,450,000 ∂248,100 ¥54,000 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 2,075,000 .......................... .......................... ¥2,075,000 ..........................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–32) ........................................................................................................ 42,875 .......................... .......................... ¥42,875 ..........................

Subtotal, Operations and maintenance .................................................................................................................. 4,319,775 2,504,000 2,450,000 ¥1,869,775 ¥54,000 

Regulatory program .............................................................................................................................................................. 183,000 190,000 190,000 ∂7,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 25,000 .......................... .......................... ¥25,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Regulatory program ................................................................................................................................. 208,000 190,000 190,000 ¥18,000 ..........................

FUSRAP ................................................................................................................................................................................. 140,000 134,000 140,000 .......................... ∂6,000 
231 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 100,000 .......................... .......................... ¥100,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Regulatory program ................................................................................................................................. 240,000 134,000 140,000 ¥100,000 ∂6,000 

Flood control and coastal emergencies ............................................................................................................................... .......................... 41,000 .......................... .......................... ¥41,000 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110–252) ...................................................................................................... 2,926,000 .......................... .......................... ¥2,926,000 ..........................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–32) ........................................................................................................ 754,290 .......................... .......................... ¥754,290 ..........................

Subtotal, Flood control and coastal emergencies .................................................................................................. 3,680,290 41,000 .......................... ¥3,680,290 ¥41,000 

Expenses ............................................................................................................................................................................... 179,365 184,000 186,000 ∂6,635 ∂2,000 Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) ..................................................................................................... 4,500 6,000 5,000 ∂500 ¥1,000 

Total, title I, Department of Defense—Civil .......................................................................................................... 16,560,530 5,125,000 5,405,000 ¥11,155,530 ∂280,000 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (5,402,365 ) (5,125,000 ) (5,405,000 ) (∂2,635 ) (∂280,000 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (11,158,165 ) .......................... .......................... (¥11,158,165 ) ..........................

TITLE II—DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Central Utah Project Completion Account 

Central Utah project construction ........................................................................................................................................ 39,373 38,800 38,800 ¥573 ..........................Fish, wildlife, and recreation mitigation and conservation ................................................................................................ 987 1,500 1,500 ∂513 ..........................

Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................................... 40,360 40,300 40,300 ¥60 ..........................

Program oversight and administration ................................................................................................................................ 1,640 1,704 1,704 ∂64 ..........................

Total, Central Utah project completion account .................................................................................................... 42,000 42,004 42,004 ∂4 ..........................

Bureau of Reclamation 

Water and related resources ................................................................................................................................................ 920,259 893,125 993,125 ∂72,866 ∂100,000 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 1,000,000 .......................... .......................... ¥1,000,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Water and related resources ................................................................................................................... 1,920,259 893,125 993,125 ¥927,134 ∂100,000 

Central Valley project restoration fund ................................................................................................................................ 56,079 35,358 35,358 ¥20,721 ..........................California Bay-Delta restoration .......................................................................................................................................... 40,000 31,000 41,000 ∂1,000 ∂10,000 Policy and administration .................................................................................................................................................... 59,400 61,200 61,200 ∂1,800 ..........................

Total, Bureau of Reclamation ................................................................................................................................. 2,075,738 1,020,683 1,130,683 ¥945,055 ∂110,000 Total, title II, Department of the Interior ............................................................................................................... 2,117,738 1,062,687 1,172,687 ¥945,051 ∂110,000 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (1,117,738 ) (1,062,687 ) (1,172,687 ) (∂54,949 ) (∂110,000 ) 
232 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2009 appropriation Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation 

Senate Committee recommendation 

compared with (∂ or ¥) 

2009 

appropriation Budget estimate 

Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (1,000,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥1,000,000 ) ..........................

TITLE III—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Energy Programs 

Energy efficiency and renewable energy .............................................................................................................................. 1,928,540 2,318,602 2,233,967 ∂305,427 ¥84,635 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110–329) ...................................................................................................... 250,000 .......................... .......................... ¥250,000 ..........................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 16,800,000 .......................... .......................... ¥16,800,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Energy efficiency and renewable energy ................................................................................................ 18,978,540 2,318,602 2,233,967 ¥16,744,573 ¥84,635 

Electricity delivery and energy reliability ............................................................................................................................. 137,000 208,008 179,483 ∂42,483 ¥28,525 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 4,500,000 .......................... .......................... ¥4,500,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Electricity delivery and energy reliability ................................................................................................ 4,637,000 208,008 179,483 ¥4,457,517 ¥28,525 

Nuclear energy ...................................................................................................................................................................... 792,000 761,634 761,274 ¥30,726 ¥360 Clean coal technology: 

Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009 ................................................................................................... 149,000 .......................... .......................... ¥149,000 ..........................Transfer to fossil energy R&D ..................................................................................................................................... ¥149,000 .......................... .......................... ∂149,000 ..........................

Total, Clean coal technology .................................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

Fossil energy research and development ............................................................................................................................. 727,320 617,565 699,200 ¥28,120 ∂81,635 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 3,400,000 .......................... .......................... ¥3,400,000 ..........................Transfer from clean coal technology .......................................................................................................................... 149,000 .......................... .......................... ¥149,000 ..........................

Subtotal, fossil energy research and development ................................................................................................ 4,276,320 617,565 699,200 ¥3,577,120 ∂81,635 

Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves ............................................................................................................................ 19,099 23,627 23,627 ∂4,528 ..........................Strategic petroleum reserve ................................................................................................................................................. 205,000 228,573 259,073 ∂54,073 ∂30,500 
233 

Northeast home heating oil reserve ..................................................................................................................................... 9,800 11,300 11,300 ∂1,500 ..........................Energy Information Administration ...................................................................................................................................... 110,595 133,058 110,595 .......................... ¥22,463 Non-defense environmental clean up .................................................................................................................................. 261,819 237,517 259,829 ¥1,990 ∂22,312 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 483,000 .......................... .......................... ¥483,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Non-defense environmental cleanup ...................................................................................................... 744,819 237,517 259,829 ¥484,990 ∂22,312 

Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund ................................................................................... 535,503 559,377 588,322 ∂52,819 ∂28,945 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 390,000 .......................... .......................... ¥390,000 ..........................Offsetting collection .................................................................................................................................................... .......................... ¥200,000 .......................... .......................... ∂200,000 

Subtotal, UEDDF ...................................................................................................................................................... 925,503 359,377 588,322 ¥337,181 ∂228,945 

Science ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4,772,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 ∂126,196 ¥42,850 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 1,600,000 .......................... .......................... ¥1,600,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Science .................................................................................................................................................... 6,372,636 4,941,682 4,898,832 ¥1,473,804 ¥42,850 

Nuclear Waste Disposal ....................................................................................................................................................... 145,390 98,400 98,400 ¥46,990 ..........................Energy transformation acceleration fund ............................................................................................................................ .......................... 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 400,000 .......................... .......................... ¥400,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Energy transformation acceleration fund ............................................................................................... 400,000 10,000 .......................... ¥400,000 ¥10,000 

Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program ................................................................................................................. 19,880 43,000 43,000 ∂23,120 ..........................

Offsetting collection .................................................................................................................................................... ¥19,880 ¥43,000 ¥43,000 ¥23,120 ..........................Proposed change in subsidy cost ............................................................................................................................... 440,000 1,500,000 .......................... ¥440,000 ¥1,500,000 (Public Law 110–161): 

Advance appropriation from previous years ...................................................................................................... 25,000 .......................... .......................... ¥25,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 6,000,000 .......................... .......................... ¥6,000,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Innovative Technology Guarantee Program ............................................................................................. 6,465,000 1,500,000 .......................... ¥6,465,000 ¥1,500,000 

Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loans program ............................................................................................ .......................... 20,000 20,000 ∂20,000 ..........................

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 110–329) ...................................................................................................... 7,510,000 .......................... .......................... ¥7,510,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Advance technology vehicles manufacturing loans program ................................................................. 7,510,000 20,000 20,000 ¥7,490,000 ..........................

Departmental administration ............................................................................................................................................... 272,643 302,071 293,684 ∂21,041 ¥8,387 

Miscellaneous revenues ............................................................................................................................................... ¥117,317 ¥119,740 ¥119,740 ¥2,423 ..........................

Net appropriation .................................................................................................................................................... 155,326 182,331 173,944 ∂18,618 ¥8,387 
234 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2009 appropriation Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation 

Senate Committee recommendation 

compared with (∂ or ¥) 

2009 

appropriation Budget estimate 

Office of the Inspector General ............................................................................................................................................ 51,927 51,445 51,927 .......................... ∂482 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 15,000 .......................... .......................... ¥15,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Office of the Inspector General .............................................................................................................. 66,927 51,445 51,927 ¥15,000 ∂482 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

National Nuclear Security Administration: 

Weapons activities ...................................................................................................................................................... 6,380,000 6,384,431 6,468,267 ∂88,267 ∂83,836 Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–32) ........................................................................................................ 30,000 .......................... .......................... ¥30,000 ..........................Defense nuclear nonproliferation ................................................................................................................................ 1,482,350 2,136,709 2,136,709 ∂654,359 ..........................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–32) ........................................................................................................ 55,000 .......................... .......................... ¥55,000 ..........................Naval reactors ............................................................................................................................................................. 828,054 1,003,133 973,133 ∂145,079 ¥30,000 Office of the Administrator ......................................................................................................................................... 439,190 420,754 420,754 ¥18,436 ..........................

Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration ............................................................................................... 9,214,594 9,945,027 9,998,863 ∂784,269 ∂53,836 

Defense environmental cleanup ........................................................................................................................................... 5,657,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 ∂106,606 ∂268,025 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 5,127,000 .......................... .......................... ¥5,127,000 ..........................

Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup .............................................................................................................. 10,784,250 5,495,831 5,763,856 ¥5,020,394 ∂268,025 

Other defense activities ....................................................................................................................................................... 1,314,063 852,468 854,468 ¥459,595 ∂2,000 Defense nuclear waste disposal .......................................................................................................................................... 143,000 98,400 98,400 ¥44,600 ..........................

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities ................................................................................................................. 21,455,907 16,391,726 16,715,587 ¥4,740,320 ∂323,861 

Power Marketing Administrations 

Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration ...................................................................................... 56,940 78,444 78,444 ∂21,504 ..........................

Offsetting collection .................................................................................................................................................... ¥49,520 ¥70,806 ¥70,806 ¥21,286 ..........................
235 

Spending in excess of receipts (proposal) ................................................................................................................. .......................... 1,000 1,000 ∂1,000 ..........................

Subtotal, O&M, Southeastern Power Administration .............................................................................................. 7,420 8,638 8,638 ∂1,218 ..........................

Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration ..................................................................................... 63,414 82,944 82,944 ∂19,530 ..........................

Offsetting collection .................................................................................................................................................... ¥35,000 ¥38,000 ¥38,000 ¥3,000 ..........................

Subtotal, O&M, Southwestern Power Administration ............................................................................................. 28,414 44,944 44,944 ∂16,530 ..........................

Construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance, Western Area Power Administration ........................................ 624,830 610,397 610,397 ¥14,433 ..........................

Offsetting collection .................................................................................................................................................... ¥403,118 ¥349,807 ¥349,807 ∂53,311 ..........................Offsetting collection Colorado River Dam Fund ......................................................................................................... ¥3,366 ¥3,879 ¥3,879 ¥513 ..........................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 111–5) .......................................................................................................... 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 ..........................

Subtotal, O&M, Western Area Power Administration .............................................................................................. 228,346 256,711 256,711 ∂28,365 ..........................

Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund ...................................................................................................... 2,959 2,568 2,568 ¥391 ..........................

Total, Power Marketing Administrations ................................................................................................................. 267,139 312,861 312,861 ∂45,722 ..........................

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

Salaries and expenses ......................................................................................................................................................... 273,400 298,000 298,000 ∂24,600 ..........................Revenues applied ................................................................................................................................................................. ¥273,400 ¥298,000 ¥298,000 ¥24,600 ..........................

Total, title III, Department of Energy ..................................................................................................................... 73,537,001 28,407,706 27,398,221 ¥46,138,780 ¥1,009,485 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (26,793,001 ) (28,407,706 ) (27,398,221 ) (∂605,220 ) (¥1,009,485 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (46,570,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥46,570,000 ) ..........................Deferrals ......................................................................................................................................................... (149,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥149,000 ) ..........................Previous year advance appropriations .......................................................................................................... (25,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥25,000 ) ..........................

TITLE IV—INDEPENDENT AGENCIES 

Appalachian Regional Commission ...................................................................................................................................... 75,000 76,000 76,000 ∂1,000 ..........................Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board .............................................................................................................................. 25,000 26,086 26,086 ∂1,086 ..........................Delta Regional Authority ...................................................................................................................................................... 13,000 13,000 13,000 .......................... ..........................Denali Commission ............................................................................................................................................................... 11,800 11,965 11,965 ∂165 ..........................Nuclear Regulatory Commission: 

Salaries and expenses ................................................................................................................................................ 1,034,656 1,061,000 1,061,000 ∂26,344 ..........................Revenues ..................................................................................................................................................................... ¥860,857 ¥878,102 ¥902,402 ¥41,545 ¥24,300 

Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................................... 173,799 182,898 158,598 ¥15,201 ¥24,300 
236 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2009 appropriation Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation 

Senate Committee recommendation 

compared with (∂ or ¥) 

2009 

appropriation Budget estimate 

Office of Inspector General ......................................................................................................................................... 10,860 10,102 10,860 .......................... ∂758 Revenues ..................................................................................................................................................................... ¥9,774 ¥9,092 ¥9,774 .......................... ¥682 

Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................................... 1,086 1,010 1,086 .......................... ∂76 Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission ................................................................................................................... 174,885 183,908 159,684 ¥15,201 ¥24,224 

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board ............................................................................................................................... 3,811 3,891 3,891 ∂80 ..........................Tennessee Valley Authority: Office of Inspector General ..................................................................................................... .......................... 19,000 .......................... .......................... ¥19,000 

Offset ........................................................................................................................................................................... .......................... ¥19,000 .......................... .......................... ∂19,000 

Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska natural gas transportation projects ............................................................ 4,400 4,466 4,466 ∂66 ..........................

Total, title IV, Independent agencies ..................................................................................................................... 307,896 319,316 295,092 ¥12,804 ¥24,224 

TITLE V—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Western Area Power Administration (borrowing authority) (sec. 301) ................................................................................ 10,000 .......................... .......................... ¥10,000 ..........................

Grand total .............................................................................................................................................................. 92,533,165 34,914,709 34,271,000 ¥58,262,165 ¥643,709 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (33,621,000 ) (34,914,709 ) (34,271,000 ) (∂650,000 ) (¥643,709 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. (58,738,165 ) .......................... .......................... (¥58,738,165 ) ..........................Deferrals ......................................................................................................................................................... (149,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥149,000 ) ..........................Previous year advance appropriations .......................................................................................................... (25,000 ) .......................... .......................... (¥25,000 ) ..........................

Æ