alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2** **Certification    of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** **Certification**     I, Romolo Santarosa certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of FCB Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2005;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation and;     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 30, 2006     /s/  Romolo Santarosa    Romolo Santarosa    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
y

lead for each

that

United

does not contain more than five one-hundredths grams of

blended,

States gallon, that is produced, refined, manufactured,

or coal and

distilled

other

or compounded from petroleum, natural gas, oil, shale oils

suspended matter, with

flameable liquids free from undissolved water, sediment or

fuel for spark

or without additives, and that is coemonly used as a

include diesel ignition Internal combustion engines. Gasoline does not fuel.

is to develop

5. “Manafacturers proving ground” means a facility whose sole purpose complete advanced vehicles for an automotive manufacturer.

vehicles

6. “Motor vehjce racing event” means a race that uses unlicensed

and

that are designed and manufactured specifically for racing purposes

of

that is conducted on a public or private racecourse for the entertainment

qualifying

the general public. A motor vehicle racing event includes practice,

to a motor

and demonstration laps conductpd as part of the activities related vehicle race.

7.. “Oxygenate” means ny bxygen-containing ashless, organic compound,

or

including

as

aliphatic alcohols and aliphatic ethers, that may be used as a fuel

under

a gasoline blending component and that is approved as a blending agent the provisions of a waiver issued by the United States environmental protectioji agency pursuant to 42 United States Lode section 7545(f). 8. “Oxygenated fuel” means an unleaded motor fuel blend that consists

or

primarily

more

of gasoline and at least one and one-half per cent byweight of one

of

oxygenates and that has been blended consistent with the provisions

pursuant

a waiver issued by the United States environmental protection agency to 42 United States Code section 7545(f), 9. “Product tron3prt TRANSFER document” means any bill of lading. loading ticket, manifest, delivery receipt. invoice or other documentation used on any occasion when a perscn transfers custody or title of motor fuel other than when motor fuel is sold or dispensed at a service station or fleet vehicle fueling facility.

monoxide

10. “Supplier” means any person who imports gasoline into e curb-on vehicle emissions control area by means of a pipeline or In truckload quantities for the person’s own use within the vehicle emissions

control area or any person who sells gasoline intended for ultimate consumption within a vehicle emissions control area, except that supplier does not mean a person with respect to gasoline supplied or sold by the person to another for resale to a retailer within a vehicle emissions control area or to a fleet owner for consumption within a vehicle emissions control area.

11. “Vehicle emissions control area” has the same meaning prescribed in section 49-541, except that such an area does not include a manufacturer’s proving ground that is located in the vehicle emissions control area.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 9

A resolution amending paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule XXV.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 9 (legislative day, JANUARY 7), 1997

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

A resolution amending paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule XXV.

1 Resolved, That paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule XXV of

2 the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended for the

3 105th Congress as follows:

4 Strike ‘‘21’’ after ‘‘Armed Services’’ and insert in lieu

5 thereof ‘‘18’’.

6 Strike ‘‘16’’ after ‘‘Banking, Housing and Urban Af7 fairs’’ and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘18’’.

8 Strike ‘‘19’’ after ‘‘Commerce, Science, and Trans9 portation’’ and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘20’’.

10 Strike ‘‘16’’ after ‘‘Environment and Public Works’’

11 and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘18’’.
2

SRES 9 ATS

1 Strike ‘‘19’’ after ‘‘Finance’’ and insert in lieu there2 of ‘‘20’’.

3 Strike ‘‘15’’ after ‘‘Governmental Affairs’’ and insert

4 in lieu thereof ‘‘16’’.

5 Strike ‘‘16’’ after ‘‘Labor and Human Resources’’

6 and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘18’’.

7 Strike ‘‘19’’ after ‘‘Small Business’’ and insert in lieu

8 thereof ‘‘18’’.

9 Strike ‘‘19’’ after ‘‘Aging’’ and insert in lieu thereof

10 ‘‘18’’.

11 Strike ‘‘17’’ after ‘‘Intelligence’’ and insert in lieu

12 thereof ‘‘19’’.

13 Strike ‘‘16’’ after ‘‘Indian Affairs’’ and insert in lieu

14 thereof ‘‘14’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 248 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 248

 Condemning the brutal killing of Mr. James Byrd, Jr., and commending 
  the Community of Jasper, Texas for the manner in which it has come 
                         together in response.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 1998

    Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Gramm, and Ms. Moseley-Braun) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Condemning the brutal killing of Mr. James Byrd, Jr., and commending 
  the Community of Jasper, Texas for the manner in which it has come 
                         together in response.

Whereas Mr. James Byrd, Jr., of Jasper, Texas, was brutally murdered on June 6, 
        1998;
Whereas since this heinous tragedy, the citizens of Jasper, from all segments of 
        the community, have come together to condemn the killing and honor the 
        memory of Mr. Byrd;
Whereas the Sheriff of Jasper County, Billy Rowles, spoke for the community when 
        he appealed that the Nation not ``label us because of this random, 
        brutal act'';
Whereas Mr. and Mrs. James Byrd, Sr., called for ``justice and peace'', asking 
        that ``we . . . get this over and put this behind us''; and
Whereas the community's response reflects the spirit that other communities 
        across the Nation have shown in the face of recent incidents of random 
        and senseless violence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) condemns the actions which occurred in Jasper, Texas as 
        horrific and intolerable, to be rejected by all Americans;
            (2) expresses its deepest condolences to the Byrd family 
        for their loss and the pain it caused;
            (3) notes the strong religious faith of the Byrd family, 
        under the inspired leadership of James Sr., and Stella Byrd, 
        and the Reverend Kenneth Lyons, Pastor of the Greater New 
        Bethel Baptist Church, that has helped the family through this 
        most trying time;
            (4) sees in the Byrd family reaction to this tragedy the 
        inspiration for hope, peace, and justice in Jasper and 
        throughout the United States;
            (5) commends the leadership shown by Jasper County Sheriff 
        Billy Rowles, City of Jasper Mayor R.C. Horn, and other 
        community leaders in responding to this tragedy;
            (6) urges that law enforcement officials at all appropriate 
        levels continue with the full and fair investigation into all 
        of the facts of the case; and
            (7) urges prosecutors to proceed with a fair and speedy 
        trial to bring the perpetrators of this outrageous crime to 
        justice.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-64;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                   VANS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended November 30, 2002 of Vans, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary H.
Schoenfeld, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                        /s/ Gary H. Schoenfeld
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gary H. Schoenfeld
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        January 9, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Starwood Lodging Trust and Starwood Lodging Corporation on Form S-3 (File No.
333-13411), Form S-3 (File No. 333-22219), and Form S-8 (File No. 333-02721), of
our report dated August 29, 1997, except for Note 9 for which the date is
September 10, 1997, on our audit of the combined financial statements of The
Flatley Hotels as of December 31, 1996, and for the year then ended, which
report is included in this Current Report on Form 8-K.

                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Francisco, California
September 19, 1997
Case No. 14,901b.

#### UNITED STATES v. CUMMINGS.

[3 Pittsb. Leg. J. 210.]

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 20, 1855.

Violation op Postal Laws—Embezzlement bt Postmaster—Trial—V ehdict.

Before IRWIN, District Judge.

The court was occupied principally in the transaction of civil business. The grand jury foimd a true bill against Henry Cummings, for mail robbery. Our readers will recollect that this man was tried on the above charge, convicted, and subsequently granted a new trial at the last term of the court in this city. He now stands indicted a second time. The trial will commence on Wednesday.

*725[Upon a final hearing, the prisoner was re-74901 ]*61 a boild for Case No.

The case of Henry Cummings, indicted for robbing the United States mail, was taken up. After a jury had been empanelled, Hon. Charles Shaler, United States district attorney, opened the case. The following is a statement- of 'the circumstances upon which the charge was brought: [See Case No. 14,-900.]

Cummings was tried and convicted in May last, but the verdict was set aside in consequence of some informality in the indictment. [Id. 14,901a.] The present bill charges the larceny of one particular ?50 note.

The testimony was mainly the same as that published by us in May last. [Case No. 14,900.] B. C. Langdon testified to having received two §550 notes on the Mahawa Bank. Massachusetts, from Mr. Judd,- at the post office .in Monterey, to be forwarded to Alexander Hubbard, at Harrison Valley, Potter county, Pa. The notes were numbered 202 and 206. He took a memorandum of them. {The memorandum, one of the notes, and the post office register .of Monterey, were offered in evidence.) Mr. Hubbard testified to having made repeated enquiry of Cummings for the letter, and was invariably told that no such letter had been received at Harrison Valley.

Col. Black and J. H. Hampton, for the de-fence.

Shaler & Plenniken, for the prosecution.

Court met at ten o’clock, to receive the verdict of the jury in the case of Henry Cummings, indicted for mail robbery. The court was informed that the jury was unable to agree, and asked to be discharged. They were were then ordered to come into court, when his honor refused to discharge them, while there was a possibility of their being able to find a verdict. They were notified that the court would meet at three o’clock in the afternoon, for their convenience.

At three o’clock the court convened, and the jurors came down.. The prisoner -was also brought in. The jury then returned a verdict of “Guilty in manner and form as he stands indicted.” Col. Black made a motion for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment. The prisoner was remanded, and court adjourned until ten o’clock on Monday.
**1995-  potato_stocks_01.13.95potato_stocks_02.14.95potato_stocks_03.14.95potato_stocks_04.13.95potato_stocks_05.12.95potato_stocks_09.21.95potato_stocks_12.15.95

**
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Gregory T. Josefsberg

Appellate case number: 01-21-00412-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-87179

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Relator Gregory T. Josefsberg filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a corresponding 

motion for temporary relief to stay the trial court’s order issued on July 20, 2021, pending 

adjudication of his petition for writ of mandamus. We grant the motion for temporary relief and 

stay the portion of the trial court’s July 20, 2021 order requiring Relator to “provide answers to 

Rachel Ann Roberts’ [Rule 202] deposition by written questions no later than July 30, 2021.” 

This order will remain in effect until relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is finally decided or 

until further order from this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: July 30, 2021
No. 59348.

protests 202370-K, etc. (Boston).

#### American Woolen Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker*Company, *Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rates applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content T. D. 53159” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384,761
<PP&E>                                          98,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,083,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          653,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    600,000
<COMMON>                                        37,423
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,083,405
<SALES>                                        408,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               408,998
<CGS>                                          209,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  675,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (270,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (271,078)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (271,078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>