alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RICHARD L. VAN WINKLE,

Petitioner,

v.

JOSEPH D. LEHMAN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C06-0916-JCC

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254, respondent’s motion to dismiss, petitioner’s response, the Report and Recommendation

of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the

balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. #9) is GRANTED;

(3) Petitioner’s § 2254 petition (Dkt. #1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and,

(4) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent,

and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this 7th day of December, 2006.

A

John C. Coughenour

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00916-JCC Document 14 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 1
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.119.c Federal Government Employee Retirement Funds Defined Contribution Plans (1)  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2016
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
2016   Q4
LineFederal government retirement funds; total financial assets held by Thrift Savings Plan
	FA344090025
	22.6
	18.0
	11.6
	16.3
	29.7
	13.9
	6.6
	16.1
	9.6
	1Federal government defined contribution retirement funds; debt securities; asset
	FA344022025
	17.4
	16.2
	16.0
	-275.9
	828.5
	25.1
	15.1
	22.5
	1.2
	2Federal government defined contribution retirement funds; Treasury securities held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset(2)
	FA343061155
	18.2
	15.9
	15.6
	-275.0
	828.0
	24.5
	13.4
	20.4
	4.1
	3Federal government retirement funds; agency- and GSE-backed securities held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset
	FA343061723
	-0.4
	0.2
	0.2
	-0.5
	0.3
	0.3
	0.8
	1.1
	-1.4
	4Federal government retirement funds; corporate and foreign bonds held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset
	FA343063023
	-0.4
	0.2
	0.2
	-0.5
	0.3
	0.3
	0.8
	1.1
	-1.4
	5Federal government retirement funds; corporate equities held by Thrift Savings Plan; asset
	FA343064123
	5.2
	1.8
	-4.4
	2.7
	0.8
	-11.2
	-8.5
	-6.4
	8.4
	6Federal government defined contribution retirement funds; claims of pension funds on sponsor; asset(3)
	FA343073053
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	289.4
	-799.7
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	7Federal government retirement funds; total financial assets held by Thrift Savings Plan
	FA344090025
	22.6
	18.0
	11.6
	16.3
	29.7
	13.9
	6.6
	16.1
	9.6
	8 Back to top
  **NOTES** Thrift Savings Plan.
Includes nonmarketable and marketable Treasury securities held by the Thrift Savings Plan G and F funds.
Suspended investments in the Thrift Savings Plan G Fund by the Treasury.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
# L_2021443EN.01000101.xml

| 10.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 443/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 443/1

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2021/2176

of 9 December 2021

amending Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (1),

Having regard to the joint proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 (2) gives effect to Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP (3) and provides for certain measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, including a freezing of their assets. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 (2) gives effect to Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP (3) and provides for certain measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, including a freezing of their assets.

| (2) | Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 amends the title of Decision 2010/788/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 amends the title of Decision 2010/788/CFSP.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The title of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 is replaced by the following:

‘
  Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 of 18 July 2005 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
  ’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. HOJS

---

(1)  See page 75 of this Official Journal.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p. 1).

2

(3)  Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP of 20 December 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and repealing Common Position 2008/369/CFSP (OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 30).

3

---
No. 51809.

#### Geo. Borgfeldt & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 657745-G (New York).

*103Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71021-71022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28498]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8536]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Antonio Canova: The Seven Last Works''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Antonio Canova: The Seven Last Works,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are

[[Page 71022]]

of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum 
of Art, New York, NY, from on or about January 22, 2014, until on or 
about April 27, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 20, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-28498 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Morris Lamonte MACK, a/k/a Lamont, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-4832.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 10, 2001.

Decided April 30, 2001.

Jan S. Strifling, Columbia, SC, for appellant. Stacey Denise Haynes, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Morris Lamonte Mack appeals from a 324-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Mack’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel states that *66there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but addresses the following issue: whether Mack’s sentence violates *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because his sentence was enhanced due to a prior felony drug conviction. Relying on *Apprendi,*Mack has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising three issues: (1) his sentence is invalid; (2) his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary; and (3) the indictment was defective. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Under *Apprendi,*any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the maximum penalty for a crime is an element of the offense, and as such, must be charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. 120 S.Ct. at 2362-63. The district court’s decision to use Mack’s prior felony drug conviction to enhance his sentence under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West 1999) was not in error. *See Almendarez-Torres v.. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); *United States v. Jones,*245 F.3d 645, 648 (7th Cir.2001).

We find the issues raised in Mack’s pro se supplemental brief are without merit.

We have examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of *Anders,*and we find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
v•,•e'^ I; Leon where you want to go 

!P;'s^^GRW!l 

www.travelstoreusa.com 

Corporat e Office: 

Brentwood/Wes t L.A. 

TravelStore Inc. 

11601 Wilshire Blvd. 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

310.575.5540 tel 

310.575.5541 fax 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Wasliington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

TravelStore Platinum 

310.689.5400 tel 

310.689.5401 fax 

Southern California : 

Irvine 

18881 Von Karman Ave. 

Suite 1400 

Irvine, CA92612 

949.930.9260 tel 

949.930.9261 fax 

Dear Secretary LaHood: ^^^^ ^^^^^ 

One World Trade Center 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's Long Belch, CA 9083i 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport a'^2lis 7070 fax 

Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December '^'"gj^'^'cove^piaza "''^ 

reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service bwaios verdes, CA 90274 

, , _ .. . 310.373.0954 tel 

U.S. airlines. 310.378.8840 fax 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and 

Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's" 

largest financial and commerce centers. Northern California: 

Elk Grove/Lagun a 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 5°*° [27""^ ^'^"^ 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific "market.I'j'g^J"^*^^^^^*"^* 

916.684.8197 fax 

American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of Emeryville 

business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air servioaoo Poweii street 

, . , ,_,_ - Suite 100 

Sinc e th e mid-1900 S Emeryville, CA 94608 

510.496.2020 tel 

510.652.8572 fax 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from 

these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we ne^"*"!,'^111^6^*"*'' 

Suite 6 

Roseville, CA 95747 

916.789.2003 tel 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly f?iW^'^^^° '°' 

Kennedy to Haneda I Sacramento 

855 Howe Ave. 

Suite 5 

Cinrorpl v ^'' ~ Sacramento, CA 95825 

s^llll-eiciy,, . ^ 916.929.5555 te/ 

916.925.0958 fax 

Santa Clara 

5201 Great America Pkwy. 

Suite 351 

Santa Clara, CA 95054 

408.919.3780 tel 

408.844.9171 fax 

Executive-Vice Presiderf 

your help to make the JFK/Haneda connection a reality.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Company's  Consolidated  Balance  Sheet at March 31, 1996 and  Consolidated
     Statement of Operations  for the three (3) months ended March 31, 1996, and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
                                              (Restated-
                                              See Note 1)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996                              
<CASH>                                           1,924,060
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,279,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                       419,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,261,693
<PP&E>                                         105,460,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,064,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,865,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,144,513
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,572
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,630,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,865,013
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,934,479
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,727,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 456,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,246,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                       929,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,317,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,317,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .09
        


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the annually  report of Cancer
      Therapeutics,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
      period  ending  February 28, 2007 as filed with
      the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
      date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),  I,  Robert
      Oldham,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
      Company,  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Company.





Dated
      as of April 16, 2007





By       /s/
      Robert Oldham


----------------------------------


Robert
      Oldham


Chief
      Executive Officer
No. 57811.

protests 214812-K (B), 215133-K (A), and 215133-K (C) (New York).

#### Schering Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protests were overruled.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAUL GUERRERO-VERDEJO,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 06-412M

DETENTION ORDER

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: August 3, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds the

following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The Pretrial Services Report of August 3, 2006 reveals that there is an immigration

detainer lodged against the defendant. 

Case 2:06-mj-00412-JPD Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant was born in and is a citizen of Mexico.

(3) There is no information available to show that defendant has any ties to this

community or to the Western District of Washington.

(4) Defendant has a criminal background history revealing prior charges and

convictions.

(5) Defendant is viewed as a risk of nonappearance because of the nature of the instant

charge and as a risk of danger based on his criminal history.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than detention

that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

/ / /

Case 2:06-mj-00412-JPD Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 3

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 3rd day of August, 2006.

s/ James P. Donohue 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-mj-00412-JPD Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 3 of 3