alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, C. Boyd Clarke, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ C. BOYD CLARKE                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |   |
| C. Boyd   Clarke                                  |   |
| President,   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |   |
|                                              |   |
|                                              |   |
| August 4,   2005                                  |   |
No. 58352.

protest 221373-K (New York).

#### Traders Service Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                       EXHIBIT 5

                                                July 2, 1999


Schuff Steel Company
1841 W. Buchanan Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85009

            RE: SCHUFF STEEL COMPANY 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We have acted as counsel to Schuff Steel Company, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with its Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
relating to the registration of 200,000 shares of its Common Stock, $.001 par
value (the "Shares"), issuable pursuant to the Company's 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "Plan").

      In that connection, we have examined such documents, corporate records,
and other instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of
this opinion, including the Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the
Bylaws of the Company.

      Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

      (1)   The Company has been duly organized and is validly existing as a
            corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware.

      (2)   The Shares, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the
            Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid, and nonassessable.

      The opinions expressed herein are limited solely to the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. We express no opinion on the laws of
any other jurisdiction or the applicability or effect of any such laws or
principles.

      The opinions expressed herein are based upon the law and the other matters
in effect on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to review or
supplement this opinion should such law be changed by legislative action,
judicial decision, or otherwise, or should any facts or other matters upon which
we have relied be changed.

      We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

Very truly yours,


/s/ SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.





                                       8
Order to Seal - 1

Kerfoot, CR06-252Z

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101

(206) 553-7970

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEVIN DONALD KERFOOT,

 Defendant.

NO. CR06-252Z

ORDER TO SEAL

Having read the Government’s Motion to Seal, docket no. 38, and because of the 

sensitive information contained in the four exhibits,

It is hereby ORDERED that Government’s Supplemental Sentencing 

Memorandum and Exhibit 5, docket no. 39, shall remain sealed.

DATED this 27th day of July, 2017.

A

Thomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00252-TSZ Document 41 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TIMOTHY R. SANDERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-5332JKA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable plaintiff to properly serve

copies of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is his responsibility to

properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summons as required by Rule 4 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05332-RJB Document 2 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 57072.

protest 173161-K (Seattle).

#### Calif-Asia Rattan Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked *“A” were*held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 403

Recognizing, appreciating, and remembering with dignity and respect the

Native American men and women who have served the United States

in military service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 2000

Mr. STUPAK submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing, appreciating, and remembering with dignity and

respect the Native American men and women who have

served the United States in military service.

Whereas it is necessary to recognize, appreciate, assist, and

remember the Native American men and women who

have served the United States in military service;

Whereas Native American men and women have served the

United States armed forces in every military campaign

since the American Revolutionary War;

Whereas some tribes, notably the Ottawa Nation, sent a special company of warriors to serve in the Civil War with

the Michigan Sharpshooters and the Ottawa Warriors of

Company K were highly decorated for their brave actions

in that military action;
2

•HCON 403 IH

Whereas some tribes, notably the Ottawa Nation, sent their

finest warriors to serve in the Spanish American War

and one of their warriors distinguished himself in the calvary with Teddy Roosevelt on San Juan Hill;

Whereas some tribes, notably Ottawa, Chippewa, and Potawatomi answered the warrior call from within and served

in great numbers in World War I even though they were

not accepted as citizens of this country at that time;

Whereas the Navajo Code Talkers as well as other tribes, including the Ottawa and Chippewa, used their sacred languages to assist our country in World War II;

Whereas these sacred languages were also used to assist the

United States efforts in the Korean war and the Vietnam

conflict during which Native American veterans distinguished themselves with their bravery;

Whereas Native American veterans served in operations

Desert Storm and Desert Shield; and

Whereas Native Americans have served in the United States

military in numbers that far exceed their representation

in the United States population: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes, appreciates,

3 and remembers with dignity and respect the service to the

4 United States of Native American veterans.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 31 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 31

To designate a flagpole upon which the flag of the United States is to 
be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the 
                             line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

 Mr. Tierney (for himself, Mr. Larson, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Saxton, Mr. 
    Meehan, Mr. Underwood, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Taylor of 
 Mississippi, Mr. Frost, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Holden, Mr. 
    English, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Borski, and Mr. Ramstad) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To designate a flagpole upon which the flag of the United States is to 
be set at half-staff whenever a law enforcement officer is slain in the 
                             line of duty.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. INSTRUCTION.

    (a) Slain Law Enforcement Officers.--The Capitol Police Board shall 
designate or establish a flagpole upon which the flag of the United 
States shall be flown at half-staff for one day whenever a Federal, 
State, local, or territorial law enforcement officer is slain in the 
line of duty.
    (b) Establishment of Procedures.--The Capitol Police Board shall 
establish efficient and effective procedures to execute subsection (a), 
and to--
            (1) ensure that the official responsible for setting the 
        flag of the United States is informed or learns promptly of the 
        slaying of any law enforcement officer;
            (2) post public notice in close proximity to the flag being 
        flown at half-staff of the name, tenure of service, and 
        jurisdiction of a slain law enforcement officer being honored; 
        and
            (3) present the flag of the United States which is flown at 
        half-staff in honor of a slain law enforcement officer to the 
        family of the slain law enforcement officer.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53357.

protests 146207-K, etc. (New York).

#### Tropical Craft Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399.) Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority the items of merchandise *124covered by protest 146207-K were held properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1023, as modified by T. D. 51802, and the items covered by protest 146589-K were held dutiable at 40 percent under said paragraph.
No. 61654.

#### Lissco Trading Corp. and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 306626-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.-

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
A90A0356.

#### TOLBERT v. THE STATE.

(390 SE2d 301)

Decided January 24, 1990.

*Lynne Y. Borsuk,*for appellant.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with armed robbery, kidnapping, and theft by receiving an allegedly stolen taxicab. A Fulton County jury acquitted him on the first two counts but found him guilty of theft by receiving; he was given a sentence of fifteen years in prison. After denial of his motion for new trial, Tolbert received permission to file an out-of-time appeal and enumerates as error the general grounds. Held:

Appellant Tolbert and another person not a party to the instant appeal were indicted for abducting the owner of a 1978 Cádillac which was being used as a taxicab, and taking from him both a small sum of money and the vehicle itself. At the time of his arrest Tolbert was riding in the back seat of the vehicle, which was driven by his co-defendant. When the police were sighted approaching from the rear, the driver sped away. The police gave chase and caught up with the fleeing vehicle when it was wrecked. Both occupants were placed under arrest. The testimony of the cab’s owner/driver established the factum and the modus of the robbery; the testimony of the arresting officers established that when the stolen vehicle was overtaken, appellant and his co-defendant were in possession of it. The taxicab driver testified that although he had not seen the robbers’ faces, he had recognized their voices as those of the defendants at the time of the preliminary hearing. He also testified that a certain green bag, identified as belonging to defendants, had been placed in the vehicle by the robbers; the bag was still in the vehicle when the defendants were arrested.

Our scrutiny of the record of the instant case, and of the trial transcript in particular, reveals no error of law and further reveals that sufficient competent evidence was adduced to authorize the finder of fact to find appellant guilty as charged. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). It is well settled that the appellate court assesses the sufficiency of the evidence and not its weight. *Rutledge v. State,*142 Ga. App. 399 (236 SE2d 143) (1977).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope, J., concurs. Beasley, J., concurs in the judgment only.*

*320
      *Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joyce M. Auerils, Joseph J. Drolet, Rebecca Keel, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-40222

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

OBIE EARL TUTT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

RICK HART,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(5:92-CV-131)

______________________________________________________

July 8, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE AND DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tutt appeals the dismissal of his § 1983 suit against prison

officials challenging his conditions of confinement in the Bi State

Detention Center in Texarkana, Texas. The district court referred

the case to a magistrate judge for an evidentiary hearing.

Following an evidentiary hearing, the magistrate judge made a

detailed report and recommendation including proposed findings of
2

fact and conclusions of law which the district court adopted.

Based on those findings and conclusions, the district court

dismissed this suit.

We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the

findings of fact are supported by the record and are not clearly

erroneous. With respect to the issues raised on appeal, we find no

error in the district court's conclusions of law. Thus, for

essentially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his

December 13, 1994 report and recommendation, which were accepted by

the district court, we affirm the district court's judgment. 

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 15.1**

The Board of Directors 

Seaspan Corporation 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 33-151329) on Form F-3D, registration statement (No. 333-168938) on FormF-3 and registration statement (No. 333-173207) on Form S-8 of Seaspan Corporation of our report dated March 23, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2011, which reports appear in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 20-F of Seaspan Corporation. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chartered Accountants

March 23, 2012 

Vancouver, Canada
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 203 (Monday, October 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72814-72817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23345]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Bradley Smith, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Enforcement, Compliance & Analysis, tel.: 202-
622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (ofac.treasury.gov).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    On October 18, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and

[[Page 72815]]

interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed 
below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23OC23.004


[[Page 72816]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23OC23.005


[[Page 72817]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23OC23.006


    Dated: October 18, 2023.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-23345 Filed 10-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, I, Evan J.
Griffith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(a) This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 13, 2005

                                                     /s/ Evan J. Griffith
                                                     Evan J. Griffith
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
### Summary of Meeting with Propoxur Pet Collar Registrants June 29, 2010

Participants:

EPA Richard Keigwin, Michael Goodis, Tracy Perr y, Jill Bloom, Monica Wait, Steve Knizner, Felecia Fort, Jeff Dawson, Elissa Reaves, Wa de Britton, Shalu Shelat, Benjamin Wakefield

Sergeant’s Pet Care Products, Inc. Kelly Hoskins, Mark Levin, Deborah Chadbourne

Exponent, Inc

. Jason Johnston By phone: Rick Tinsworth

Wellmark International James McFadden, Maija Mizens By phone: Steve Spaulding, Barry Harrison

McLaughlin Gormley King Company By phone: Jan Sharp, Christopher Riley

Summary:

At the request of Sergeant’s Pet Care Products, EPA met with the propoxur registrants identified above and their representatives on June 29, 2010. Agenda topics centered around EPA’s 2010 Occupational and Residential Exposure (ORE) A ssessment for Propoxur Formulated Pet Collars and included the calculated margins of exposure, the Agency’s request for additional data, and interim mitigation measures.

EPA and the registrants discusse d potential refinements to the ORE assessment, status of the registration review of propoxur, the anticipated data call-i n for propoxur under registration review, the process for responding to the Na tural Resources Defens e Council’s propoxur petition, and study specif ic clarifications.
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/injuryviolenceandsafety/break-silence-stop-violence.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/injuryviolenceandsafety/break-silence-stop-violence.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 99.7


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Penn West Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William E. Andrew, Chief Executive Officer of Penn West Petroleum Ltd., as successor to the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.




By:
/s/ William E. AndrewWilliam E. AndrewChief Executive Officer of Penn West Petroleum Ltd.,successor to Penn West Energy Trust





March 17, 2011