ORDER

Order granting an exemption from customer identification program requirements

implementing section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5318(l), for loans

extended by banks (and their subsidiaries) subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal

Banking Agencies to all customers to facilitate purchases of property and casualty

insurance policies.

Issue Date: October 5, 2020

Page 1

By ORDER, under the authority set forth in 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220(b) implementing

section 326(a)of the USA PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5318(l)(5), the Office of the

Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System (Federal Reserve), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the

National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), collectively the Federal Banking 

Agencies (FBAs), with the concurrence of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

(FinCEN), hereby grant an exemption from the requirements of the customer

identification program (CIP) rules implementing section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act,

31 U.S.C. § 5318(l), [Footnote 1

- 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220 (FinCEN); 12 C.F.R. § 21.21(c)(2) (OCC); 12 C.F.R. §§ 208.63(b)(2) and 

211.24(j)(2) (Federal Reserve); 12 C.F.R. § 326.8(b)(2) (FDIC); and 12 C.F.R. § 748.2(b)(2) (NCUA)

(collectively, the CIP rules). End of Footnote 1.]

for loans extended by banks [Footnote 2

- This ORDER is applicable to banks, as that term is defined by 31 C.F.R. § 1010.100(d), and their

subsidiaries, that are subject to the jurisdiction of the OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, or NCUA. End of Footnote 2.]

(and their subsidiaries [Footnote 3

- See, e.g., 12 C.F.R. §§ 5.34(e)(3) and 5.38(e)(3) (requirements governing operating subsidiaries of

national banks and Federal savings associations); see also https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutesregulations/guidance/interagency-interpretive-guidance-customer-identification for interagency FAQs

describing the applicability ofthe CIP rules to bank subsidiaries. End of Footnote 3.]

) subject to the

FBAs' jurisdiction to all customers to facilitate purchases of property and casualty

insurance policies [Footnote 4

- This ORDER does not apply to life insurance policies, annuity contracts or any other insurance product 

with features of cash value or investment. End of Footnote 4.]

(hereinafter referred to as premium finance loans or premium finance

lending).

Background

By letter dated September 20, 2016, and by letter dated March 27, 2017, a consortium of

banks [Footnote 5

- The consortium included the following banks: Pacific Enterprise Bank; BankDirect Capital Finance, LLC

- BankDirect Capital Finance, a Division of Texas Capital Bank, N.A.; Premium Assignment Corporation,

a subsidiary of SunTrust Bank; First Insurance Funding Corp.; AFCO Credit Corporation - AFCO

Acceptance Corporation- Prime Rate Premium Finance Corp., subsidiaries ofBranch Banking & Trust

Company (BB&T); and Metabank (its AFS/IBEX division). End of Footnote 5.]

submitted a request to the FBAs and FinCEN for an exemption or interpretation
Page 2

regarding the application of the CIP rules to insurance premium finance lending (the

“Request Letters”). [Footnote 6

- The FBAs also consider oral representations made by the consortium as included in the Request Letters. End of Footnote 6.]

The Request Letters asserted that there is no need to apply the CIP

rules to insurance premium finance lending because this activity presents a low risk of

money laundering. On September 27, 2018, the FBAs and FinCEN issued an Order

granting an exemption from the requirements of the CIP rules implementing section 326 

of the USA PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5318(l), for loans extended by banks (and their

subsidiaries)subject to the FBAs' jurisdiction only to commercial customers [Footnote 7

- In the Order dated September 27, 2018, commercial customers included businesses organized, for

example, as corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and trusts. End of Footnote 7.]

to facilitate

premium finance lending. By letter dated November 12, 2018, the American Bankers

Association requested that the CIP exemption apply to all customers of premium finance

lending and not just commercial customers (the “Supplemental Letter”). The

Supplemental Letter noted that the same rationale for the CIP exemption for commercial

customers also applies to an exemption for all customers of premium finance lending.

Regulatory Requirements

Under 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220(b), the appropriate FBA with the concurrence of the 

Secretary of the Treasury may by order or regulation exempt any bank or type of account 

from the requirements of the CIP rules. The Secretary's authority under this provision has

been delegated to FinCEN. The FBAs and FinCEN must consider whether the proposed

exemption would be consistent with the purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) [Footnote 8

- 31 U.S.C. § 5311 (setting forth the purposes of the BSA). End of Footnote 8.]

and

with safe and sound banking and may consider other appropriate factors.

The CIP rules require a bank to implement a CIP that includes risk-based verification

procedures that enable the bank to form a reasonable belief that it knows the true identity

of its customers. [Footnote 9

- 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220(a)(2). End of Footnote 9.]

These procedures must specify the identifying information that a bank

will obtain from each customer prior to opening an account. These procedures must also

include, at a minimum, the customer's name, date of birth (for an individual), address, 

and identification number. For an individual, the address must be a residential or

business street address; for an individual who does not have a residential or business

street address, an Army Post Office or Fleet Post Office box number, or the residential or

business street address of next of kin or of another contact individual, is acceptable. The

address for a person other than an individual (such as a corporation, partnership, or trust)

must be a principal place of business, local office, or other physical location. For a U.S.

person, the identification number must be a taxpayer identification number. For a nonU.S. person, one or more of the following is required: a taxpayer identification number,

passport number and country of issuance, alien identification card number, or number and

country of issuance of any other government-issued document evidencing nationality or
Page 3

residence and bearing a photograph or similar safeguard. [Footnote 10

- 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220(a)(2)(i). End of Footnote 10.]

The CIP must also contain

procedures for verifying the identity of the customer. [Footnote 11

- 31 C.F.R. § 1020 220(a)(2)(ii). End of Footnote 11.]

Description of Premium Finance Lending

Premium finance loans provide short-term financing to business and non-business

borrowers to facilitate their purchases of property and casualty insurance policies.

According to FinCEN, these types of loans present a low risk of money laundering

because of the purpose for which the loans are extended and limitations on the ability of a

customer to use such funds for any other purpose. [Footnote 12

- See “Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions,” 81 FR 29398, 29418 (May 11,

2016). End of Footnote 12.]

Moreover, according to FinCEN,

property and casualty insurance policies themselves are not an effective means for 

transferring illicit funds. [Footnote 13

- See “Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations—AntiMoney Laundering Programs for Insurance Companies,” 70 FR 66754, 66757 (Nov. 3, 2005). End of Footnote 13.]

Insurance agents and brokers assist their customers to arrange financing for the purchase

of single-premium insurance policies. An insurance agent or broker typically solicits

loan quotes from one or more premium finance lenders and then presents these quotes to

the customer of the insurance agent or broker (i.e., the applicant or potential borrower).

Most lenders require that insurance agents or brokers only request financing for insurance

policies issued by insurance companies with satisfactory credit ratings. The agents and

brokers who facilitate these transactions are not required to collect customer information

under the CIP rules.

Once the potential borrower selects a loan offer and the terms are finalized, the potential

borrower typically remits a down payment toward the insurance premium directly to the 

agent or broker. The premium finance lender advances a loan to the borrower covering

the remainder of the single premium. Importantly, the bank remits the loan proceeds to

the insurance company directly or through the agent or broker. The borrower is obligated

to make payments on the loan either to the bank or to the agent or broker acting as an 

intermediary to forward the loan payments to the bank. The principal collateral for such

a loan is the unearned premiums paid to the insurance company.

Because the lender depends on the return of these unearned premiums for repayment of

the loan if a customer defaults, the lender has credit exposure to the insurance company

that issued the insurance policy. Accordingly, a lender typically assesses the

creditworthiness of the insurance company and not that of the potential borrower that is

seeking to finance the purchase of a policy. For this reason, the bank premium finance

lender has minimal interaction with the potential borrower while the loan is being 

underwritten.
Page 4

Request Letters

The Request Letters represented that there is no need to apply the CIP rules to insurance

premium finance lending because this activity presents a low risk of money laundering.

In support of this contention, they note that the processes for executing a premium

finance loan are highly automated, as most premium finance industry loan volume is

quoted and recorded electronically. Moreover, the Request Letters state that these loans

are typically submitted, approved and funded within the same business day and are

conducted through insurance agents or brokers with no interaction between the bank and 

the borrower. The Request Letters maintain that these business processes make it

difficult for banks to fully comply with the CIP information collection requirements.

Specifically, agents and brokers do not initially provide bank premium finance lenders

with taxpayer identification numbers and, in the case of sole proprietorships or

individuals, the date of birth of the borrower. The Request Letters state that bank 

premium finance lenders, in compliance with their CIP requirements, must request this

information from the agent or broker, creating delays in processing. The Request Letters

also state that because of data privacy concerns, insurance brokers and agents are

reluctant to collect personal information, such as the date of birth and social security

number of individuals or individuals owning sole proprietorships. The Request Letters

acknowledge that a bank would not be in compliance with the CIP rules if it approved a

premium finance loan and opened an account on behalf of a customer without having the

required information to identify and verify the customer's identity.

Supplemental Letter

The Supplemental Letter states that the same rationale for the exemption for commercial

customers is equally valid for individual customers. The Supplemental Letter notes that

the inclusion of individuals acting as sole proprietors in the definition of commercial

customers indicates that the risk for all individuals is the same. Accordingly, the

Supplemental Letter requests that the Order dated September 27, 2018, be amended to

clarify that the CIP exemption applies to all premium finance loans without limitation

based on type of customer.

Findings Supportive of an Exemption

Based on the information presented by the Request Letters and the Supplemental Letter, 

and in accordance with 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220(b) implementing section 326(a) of the USA

PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5318(l)(5), the FBAs, with the concurrence of FinCEN, by

this ORDER, and for the reasons described below, find that there is a valid basis for an

exemption to apply to all customers of premium finance lending.

First, the FBAs find that the exemption is consistent with the purposes of the BSA, based

on FinCEN's determination that premium finance loans present a low risk of money

laundering or terrorist financing. The purpose of the BSA is “to require certain reports or

records where they have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory

investigations or proceedings, or in the conduct of intelligence or counterintelligence
Page 5

activities, including analysis, to protect against international terrorism.” [Footnote 14

- 31 U.S.C. § 5311. End of Footnote 14.]

The CIP rules

were promulgated pursuant to Title III, Section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act, which

added a new subsection to the BSA. [Footnote 15

- 31 U.S.C. § 5318(l). End of Footnote 15.]

The purposes of Title III of the USA PATRIOT

Act are, inter alia:

• to increase the strength of United States measures to prevent, detect, and

prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism;

• to provide a clear national mandate for subjecting to special scrutiny those foreign

jurisdictions, financial institutions operating outside of the United States, and 

classes of international transactions or types of accounts that pose particular,

identifiable opportunities for criminal abuse; and

• to ensure that all appropriate elements of the financial services industry are

subject to appropriate requirements to report potential money laundering

transactions to proper authorities. [Footnote 16

- Title III, Section 302 ofthe USA PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5311 note. End of Footnote 16.]

The Request Letters represented that premium finance loans present a low risk of money

laundering or terrorist financing because (1) the loan proceeds are remitted to the

insurance company (either directly or through an agent/broker) rather than the insured

party, (2) property and casualty insurance policies have no investment value, and (3)

borrowers cannot use these accounts to purchase other merchandise, deposit or withdraw 

cash, write checks, or transfer funds.

FinCEN agrees that the structural characteristics of premium finance lending, as

described, present a low risk for money laundering activity or terrorist financing. In

addition, FinCEN has already made the independent determination that these types of

accounts present a low risk of money laundering, both because of the purpose for which 

such accounts are established and because the characteristics of these accounts make

them poor vehicles for money laundering. [Footnote 17

- See “Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions,” 81 FR 29398, 29418 (May 11,

2016). End of Footnote 17.]

Based on this determination, FinCEN

exempted financial institutions that finance insurance premiums from the general

requirement to identify and verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of legal entity

customers [Footnote 18

- 31 C.F.R. § 1010.230(h)(iii). End of Footnote 18.]

and further exempted financial institutions that finance insurance premiums

that allow for cash refunds from these beneficial ownership requirements. [Footnote 19

-FIN-2018-R001, “Premium Finance Cash Refunds and Beneficial Ownership Requirements for Legal

Entity Customers” (May 11, 2018) (confirming, based on FinCEN's discussions with law enforcement, that

insurance premium financing presents a low risk of money laundering, notwithstanding the potential for

cash refunds to the borrower). End of Footnote 19.]

Similarly,
Page 6

FinCEN has exempted commercial property and casualty insurance policies from the

BSA compliance program rule for insurance companies. [Footnote 20

- 70 FR 66754, 66757 (Nov. 3, 2005); 31 C.F.R. § 1025.100(b) (defining covered products to include

permanent life insurance, annuity contracts and other insurance products with features of cash value or

investment). End of Footnote 20.]

Second, this exemption is consistent with safe and sound banking. The resulting banking

practices will not be contrary to generally accepted standards of prudent banking

operation and will not give rise to abnormal risk or loss or damage to an institution, its

shareholders, or the agencies administering the insurance funds. The Request Letters

represented that the insurance premium finance business is a form of secured lending.

Should a borrower default, the insurance company is legally obligated to return any

unearned premiums to the lender. Further, most lenders require that insurance agents or

brokers only request financing for insurance policies issued by insurance companies with

a satisfactory credit rating. Also, as previously noted, the structural characteristics of

premium finance lending present a low risk for money laundering activity or terrorist

financing and thus are unlikely to pose a risk to the safety and soundness of the

institution. Finally, banks engaging in consumer premium finance lending must comply

with applicable consumer protection laws.

Accordingly, the FBAs find that this ORDER is consistent with safe and sound banking

practices.

Therefore, each FBA, with FinCEN's concurrence, hereby grants by ORDER an

exemption from the requirements of the CIP rules implementing section 326 of the USA

PATRIOT Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5318(l), for loans extended by banks (and their subsidiaries)

subject to that FBA's jurisdiction to all customers to facilitate purchases of property and

casualty insurance policies by the borrower. This ORDER supersedes the previous Order 

issued on September 27, 2018.

In arriving at the determinations in this ORDER, the FBAs have relied on the

determinations made by FinCEN and the accuracy and completeness of the

representations made in the Request Letters and the Supplemental Letter. Nothing in this

ORDER shall bar, estop, or otherwise prevent the FBAs from taking any action affecting

a bank, including the revocation of this ORDER, on the basis of information not known

to the FBAs as of the effective date of the ORDER.

Banks engaging in premium finance lending must continue to comply with all other

regulatory requirements, including the regulations implementing the BSA that require the

filing of suspicious activity reports. [Footnote 21

- 12 C.F.R. §§ 21.11 and 163.180 (OCC); 12 C.F.R. §§ 208.62, 211.5(k), 211.24(f), and 225.4(f) (Federal

Reserve); 12 C.F.R. § 353 (FDIC); 12 C.F.R. § 748 (NCUA); 31 C.F.R. § 1020.320 (FinCEN). End of Footnote 21.]
Page 7

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 5th day of October, 2020

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Signed By:

Ann E. Misback

Secretary of the Board

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

By: /s/________________________________

Doreen R. Eberley

Director, Division of Risk Management Supervision

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

Signed By:

Myra Toeppe

Acting Director, Office of Examination and Insurance

OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY

Signed By:

Grovetta N. Gardineer

Senior Deputy Comptroller for Bank Supervision Policy

WITH CONCURRENCE, this 5th day of October, 2020

OF THE FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK

Signed By:

Michael Mosier

Deputy Director