alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas J. Stultz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Triple Crown Media, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 31, 2006 By:  /s/ THOMAS J. STULTZ   Name:  Thomas J. Stultz   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, DC 20551

May 9, 2017

Mr. Neal J. Wilson

Chief Operating Officer

EJF Capital LLC

2107 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 410
Arlington, Virginia 22201

Dear Mr. Wilson:

This letter responds to your request on behalf of EJF Capital LLC (together
with its affiliates.and subsidiaries, “EJF”), Arlington, Virginia, for relief from
commitments that EJF made to the Board on December 10, 2012, in connection with its
purchase of preferred shares (“CPP Shares”) issued by The Baraboo Bancorporation, Inc.
(“Baraboo Bancorporation”), Baraboo, Wisconsin, to the U.S. Department of the
Treasury as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program’s Capital Purchase Program. EJF
provided the Board with passivity commitments that were intended to ensure that EJF
would not exercise a controlling influence over Baraboo Bancorporation and that the CPP
Shares would not be treated as voting securities under the Bank Holding Company Act.
The requested relief would completely relieve EJF from the commitments.

Baraboo Bancorporation redeemed all of the CPP Shares held by EJF on
December 29, 2016, and EJF has no remaining equity interest in Baraboo
Bancorporation. EJF represents that it does not have representation on the boards of
directors of Baraboo Bancorporation or any of its affiliates or the right to appoint a
director to the boards of directors of Baraboo Bancorporation or any of its affiliates;
existing or contemplated business relationships with Baraboo Bancorporation or any of
its affiliates; employee or director interlocks with Baraboo Bancorporation or any of its
affiliates; formal or informal agreements with Baraboo Bancorporation or any of its
affiliates relating to the management or policies of Baraboo Bancorporation or any of its
affiliates; or relationships with other shareholders of Baraboo Bancorporation through
which it might exercise influence over Baraboo Bancorporation or any of its affiliates.

www.federalreserve.gov


-2-

EJF also has represented that it will not exercise or attempt to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of Baraboo Bancorporation or any of its
affiliates.

Based on all the facts of record, the Director of the Division of Supervision
and Regulation, acting pursuant to authority delegated by the Board, and after consulting
with the General Counsel, has approved EJF’s request for relief from the commitments
provided in connection with EJF’s purchase of the CPP Shares. This action is based on
the representations and commitments set forth in all of your communications related to
your request, including the representations discussed above. Any change in the facts
presented could result in a different conclusion and should be reported to Board staff
immediately. This determination should not be construed as granting relief from any
other conditions or commitments to which EJF may be subject.

Very truly yours,
\y uy M rents

MargaretWMcCloskey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 18, 2014*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.208 Open Market Paper** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Louis J. Brothers, Chief Financial Officer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: April 13, 2010

By:   */s/ Louis J. Brothers*

Louis J. Brothers

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial   

Officer,  and Chairman of the Board

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The information contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
No. 63930.

protests 270691-K, etc. (New York).

#### Altray Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*379Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chewing gum similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fred L. Strauss*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 136, C.D. 2117), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the use in the Registration Statement of Osage Systems Group, Inc.
on Form S-3, of our report dated January 16, 1998 on the financial statements of
Open Systems Technologies, Inc., appearing in such Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Registration Statement.


/s/ Clark, Schaefer, Hackett & Co.
CLARK, SCHAEFER, HACKETT & CO.


Cincinnati, Ohio


June 23, 1999
Order of Dismissal -- 1

United States v. Silva-Chavez, et al., CR06-198RSL 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 

(206) 553-7970

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

(04) JORGE PULIDO-MORA and

(13) UBALDO PEREYRA-GONZALEZ,

 Defendants. 

 No. CR06-198RSL 

 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

This matter comes before the Court upon the notice of the United States for leave to 

dismiss all pending charges in this matter as to fugitive defendants Jorge PULIDO-MORA 

and Ubaldo PEREYRA-GONZALEZ. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

All pending counts in the above-captioned case against the above-captioned 

defendants are dismissed, without prejudice. 

// 

// 

// 

Case 2:06-cr-00198-RSL Document 723 Filed 02/16/23 Page 1 of 2
Order of Dismissal -- 2

United States v. Silva-Chavez, et al., CR06-198RSL

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101

(206) 553-7970

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

The outstanding warrants shall be quashed. 

DATED this 16th day of February, 2023. _______________________________________ ROBERT S. LASNIK 

United States District Court Judge 

Presented by:

s/ Todd Greenberg 

TODD GREENBERG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 2:06-cr-00198-RSL Document 723 Filed 02/16/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2016-00559]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0647; FRL-9941-21-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arkansas; 
Crittenden County Base Year Emission Inventory

Correction

    In rule document 2016-00559 beginning on page 1884 in the issue of 
Thursday, January 14, 2016, make the following correction:
    On page 1885, in the first column, in the 14th line, ``March 14, 
2016'' should read ``February 16, 2016''.

[FR Doc. C1-2016-00559 Filed 1-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
|What's New ·

What's Next ·

Site Map ·
A-Z Index ·
Careers ·

RSS ·
All Videos ·

Current FAQs |  | Search Advanced Search | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 Current Release
Release Dates
Enhanced Financial Accounts
Financial Accounts Guide
Technical Q&As
Announcements
  F.126 Agency- and GSE-Backed Mortgage Pools  
 Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates Description
Series code
2014
2015
2015   Q1
2015   Q2
2015   Q3
2015   Q4
2016   Q1
2016   Q2
2016   Q3
LineAgency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; total mortgages; asset
	FA413065005
	75.0
	126.9
	14.9
	120.2
	176.5
	196.2
	136.4
	158.7
	93.8
	1Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; home mortgages; asset
	FA413065105
	50.8
	94.1
	0.7
	84.8
	149.2
	141.6
	98.4
	106.3
	100.9
	2Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; multifamily residential mortgages; asset
	FA413065405
	24.3
	32.2
	14.4
	35.5
	24.1
	54.7
	36.6
	52.3
	-6.9
	3Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; commercial mortgages; asset
	FA413065505
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	0.0
	4Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; farm mortgages; asset
	FA413065605
	-0.1
	0.7
	-0.2
	-0.1
	3.2
	-0.1
	1.4
	0.1
	-0.2
	5Agency-and GSE-backed mortgage pools; total mortgages; asset
	FA413065005
	75.0
	126.9
	14.9
	120.2
	176.5
	196.2
	136.4
	158.7
	93.8
	6 Back to top
  **NOTES** GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Farmer Mac, and Farmers Home Administration pools.  Beginning 2010:Q1, almost all Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage pools (F.126) are consolidated on Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's balance sheets (table F.125). Also includes agency- and GSE-backed mortgage pool securities that are used as collateral for agency- and GSE-backed CMOs and privately issued CMOs. Excludes Federal Financing Bank holdings of pool securities, which are included with federal government mortgages and other loans.
Such issues are classified as agency- and GSE-backed securities.
  Home Economic Research & Data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer Website Policies FOIA
 PDF Reader
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31044

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BILLY C. CALLAWAY,

also known as Chris Callaway,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-93-F

- - - - - - - - - -

August 15, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Billy C. Callaway appeals his conviction after pleading

guilty to the use of a facility in interstate commerce to

facilitate murders-for-hire. Callaway contends that his guilty

plea was involuntary because defense counsel rendered ineffective

assistance in failing to advise him adequately about the defense

of “manufactured federal jurisdiction.”
No. 96-31044

-2-

We resolve such an issue on direct appeal only when the

record allows us to evaluate fairly its merits. United States v.

Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1987). In the instant case,

the record shows that Callaway would not have qualified for the

asserted defense. See United States v. Clark, 62 F.3d 110, 113-

14 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, counsel was not ineffective for

not advising Callaway about that defense. See Hill v. Lockhart,

474 U.S. 52, 56-57 (1985). 

AFFIRMED.
Case No. 14,901.

#### UNITED STATES v. CUMMINGS.

[3 Pittsb. Leg. J. 405.]

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

April 5, 1856.

Indictment—Embezzlement bt Postmastbk.

[An indictment charging a postmaster with taking a note on a bank from a package in the mail, and converting it to his own use, is fatally defective, without an averment that the note was the property of some person.]

[Cited in U. S. v. Laws. Case No. 15,579; U. S. v. Haynes, 29 Fed. 698.]

Before ERWIN, District Judge.

In the case of the United States against Henry Cummings, indicted for mail robbery, which had been certified to the United States circuit court to get the opinion of his honor, Judge Grier, in reference to the motion in arrest of judgment, Judge Shaler remarked that the judge of the circuit court had decided that after a conviction the case could not be properly certified from the one court to the other. It being, therefore, improperly before that tribunal, no opinion as to the matter could be given. He then moved that the case be certified back from the circuit to the district court for further consideration and final action.

So ordered by THE COURT, and entered upon the record. [Case No. 14,900.]

Judge Shaler then stated that, inasmuch as the argument on the motion in arrest of judgment had been heard, his honor would be pleased to decide upon it.

IRWIN, District Judge,

remarked that he had examined the authorities bearing on the case, and was convinced that the motion should be granted, for the reason that it was not alleged in the indictment that the note taken from the letter was the property of any person. The judgment was therefore arrested. [Cases Nos. 14,901a, 14,901b.]

The prosecuting attorney alluded to the fact that a similar point had been decided in the same way by Judge Curtis.

Col. Black, attorney for Henry Cummings, remarked, in justice to Mr. Shaler, that this question had never before been raised in either the Eastern or Western district of Pennsylvania, and that the uniform custom was to frame the indictments as drawn up by the United States district attorney.

Judge Shaler stated that he had consulted with government officers on the subject, and deemed it consistent with duty to permit the defendant to enter into recognizance in $2,000, conditioned for his appearance at the October term of that court.

Henry Cummings and his brother Calvin then entered into the required bond, and the prisoner was released.

Mr. Cummings it will be remembered, was postmaster at Harrison. Potter county, in 1854, and in June of that year it was alleged that Oliver Judd, of Monterey, Mass., addressed a letter, containing two fifty-dollar notes, on the Mahawa Bank, to a relative named Nathaniel Judd, at Harrison, which was never received. In October of the same year, Cummings went west to buy land, arid was arrested at Detriot after having exchanged at a broker’s office a note similar to those alleged to have been stolen. He has been in our jail ever since,—a period of about seventeen months.
III

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 59

Designating the month of March of each year as ‘‘Irish American Heritage

Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. MACK, Mr. MOYNIHAN, and Mr. D’AMATO)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the month of March of each year as ‘‘Irish

American Heritage Month’’.

Whereas by 1776 nearly 300,000 persons had emigrated to

the United States from Ireland;

Whereas following the Revolutionary War victory of Washington’s troops at Yorktown, a French Major General reported that Congress and America owed its existence,

and possibly its preservation, to the support of the Irish;

Whereas at least 8 signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Irish origin;

Whereas more than 200 Irish Americans have been awarded

the Congressional Medal of Honor;
2

•SRES 59 IS

Whereas 19 Presidents of the United States proudly claim

Irish heritage, including the first President, George

Washington;

Whereas 44 million American citizens are of Irish descent;

and

Whereas the Irish and their descendants have contributed

greatly to the enrichment of all aspects of life in the

United States, including military and government service,

science, education, art, agriculture, business, industry,

and athletics: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates the month of March of each year

3 as ‘‘Irish American Heritage Month’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation designating the month of March of each year

6 as ‘‘Irish American Heritage Month’’ and calling on

7 the people of the United States to observe the month

8 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY   PERIOD  ENDED   SEPTEMBER  29,  1996  AND  IS   QUALIFIED   IN   ITS  
ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000876400
<NAME>                          STIMSONITE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                            387
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,276 
<INVENTORY>                                    13,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44,496
<PP&E>                                         31,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 80,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,154
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           89
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,572 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   80,199
<SALES>                                        84,298 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               84,298
<CGS>                                          54,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  54,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20,503 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,477
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,625
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   332 
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

                                                                                

</TABLE>