alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICA SERVICE GROUP INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,743,000
<SECURITIES>                                   240,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,520,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (130,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    231,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,945,000
<PP&E>                                       4,029,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,327,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,298,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,784,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,333,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,298,000
<SALES>                                     55,463,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,797,000
<CGS>                                       49,338,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               53,992,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (660,000)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,465,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,460,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,460,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Represents nonrecurring gain related to MedPartners' Settlement Agreement
<F2>Primary represents basic earnings per share and diluted represents dilutive
earnings per share
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551

DIVISION OF BANKING

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

SR 13-5

March 22, 2013

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION

 AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AND TO STATE MEMBER BANKS

SUBJECT: Revisions to the Required Data Fields for the Interagency Loan Data Request

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all state 

member banks that voluntarily participate in the Interagency Loan Data Request, including those 

with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (collectively, the agencies) and 

the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) have increased the number of required loan 

data fields in the Interagency Loan Data Request (ILDR). In 2002, the agencies and the CSBS

implemented a voluntary standardized request for 82 data fields of electronic loan information to 

be used in safety-and-soundness examinations.1

 For those institutions voluntarily participating 

in ILDR, the agencies are now increasing the number of required loan data fields from 5 to 30 to 

facilitate greater consistency in the data submission process. 

The attachment provides a listing of the 82 data fields and highlights the required fields. 

Other than the change in the number of required fields, the ILDR format and layout remain 

unchanged. 2 Financial institutions using the ILDR should provide the new required loan data 

fields for examinations starting after September 30, 2013. The electronic collection of this loan 

level data reduces the time that examiners spend compiling the information, giving them more 

time to analyze the data. In turn, banks benefit from a more efficient examination process.

 1 Refer to the March 11, 2002, interagency press release, “Interagency Loan Data Request to Improve the Bank 

Examination Process,” at http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/general/2002/20020311/default.htm

2 State member banks should continue to submit their electronic loan data for the Automated Loan Examination 

Review Tool (ALERT) via a secure website. A state member bank should contact its Federal Reserve Bank with 

any questions regarding the submission of loan data and the use of this secure website.
Page 2 of 2

Federal Reserve Banks should distribute this letter to the state member banks in their 

districts and to appropriate supervisory staff. Questions regarding this guidance may be directed 

to Richard C. Watkins, Assistant Director, at (202) 452-3421. In addition, questions may be sent 

via the Board’s public website.3

Michael S. Gibson

Director

Attachment: 

• Table of Data Fields for Interagency Loan Data Request (IDLR)

 3 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 221 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 221

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Authorizing printing of the brochures entitled ``How Our Laws Are 
   Made'' and ``Our American Government'', the pocket version of the 
 United States Constitution, and the document-sized, annotated version 
                   of the United States Constitution.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 221

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF DOCUMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Each of the documents referred to in section 2 
shall be printed as a House document, in a style and manner determined 
by the Chair of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) Additional Copies for House and Senate.--There shall be printed 
for the use of the House of Representatives and the Senate an aggregate 
number of copies of the documents printed under subsection (a) not to 
exceed the lesser of--
            (1) 2,200,000; or
            (2) the maximum number of copies for which the aggregate 
        printing cost does not exceed an amount established by the 
        Joint Committee on Printing.

SEC. 2. DOCUMENTS DESCRIBED.

    The documents referred to in this section are as follows:
            (1) The 1999 revised edition of the brochure entitled ``How 
        Our Laws Are Made''.
            (2) The 1999 revised edition of the brochure entitled ``Our 
        American Government''.
            (3) The 20th edition of the pocket version of the United 
        States Constitution.
            (4) The 1999 edition of the document-sized, annotated 
        version of the United States Constitution.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 9, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**
**EXHIBIT 31.4**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Steve E. Swain, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form10-K/A of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 29, 2020           
/s/ Steven E. Swain
   Steven E. Swain   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Independent Auditors

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the SSE Telecom, Inc. Directors' Stock Option
Plan of our report dated December 4, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of SSE Telecom, Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 27, 1997, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
April 30, 1998

                                       11
# C_2020339EN.01002802.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/28

---

Action brought on 12 August 2020 — Devin v EUIPO — Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DEVIN)

(Case T-526/20)

(2020/C 339/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Devin EAD (Devin, Bulgaria) (represented by: B. Van Asbroeck, G. de Villegas and C. Haine, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Haskovo, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark DEVIN — European Union trade mark No 9 408 865

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 May 2020 in Case R 2535/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles (7)(1)(c) and 7(3) or Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles (7)(1)(c) and 7(3) or Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Article (7)(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Article (7)(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Article (7)(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Article (7)(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Technology Solutions Company.
 Date:  November 13, 2006
    By:
    /s/ CARL F. DILL, JR.Carl F. Dill, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RENOTE PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Page 1

 Law Offices of 

 Mann, Johnson, Wooster & McLaughlin, P.S.

 820 A STREET, SUITE 550

 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

 (253) 572-4161 Tacoma

 (253) 838-1154 Seattle

 (253) 572-4167 Facsimile

 

THE HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

Hearing date:July 17th, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA 

TARA CARRIS, 

 

Plaintiff,

vs.

PENINSULA LIGHT COMPANY, 

 

 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.: C06-5216 RBL

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

RENOTE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THIS MATTER, having come on regularly before the undersigned Judge in the above

entitled court upon the Plaintiff’s Motion to Renote Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment,

and the Court having reviewed the following documents in connection with this motion:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment;

Case 3:06-cv-05216-RBL Document 24 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RENOTE PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Page 2

 Law Offices of 

 Mann, Johnson, Wooster & McLaughlin, P.S.

 820 A STREET, SUITE 550

 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

 (253) 572-4161 Tacoma

 (253) 838-1154 Seattle

 (253) 572-4167 Facsimile

2. Declaration of Richard H. Wooster in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment and Exhibits A-J attached thereto;

3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment;

4. Declaration of Warren E. Martin in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment;

5. Plaintiff’s Motion to Renote Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and

6. Declaration of Richard H. Wooster in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Renote

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

And the Court having reviewed all relevant and admissible pleadings and documents on

file in this matter, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Renote Plaintiff’s

Motion for Summary Judgment for July 27th, 2007 is hereby granted. 

DONE IN OPEN COURT this 11th day of July, 2007.

(

A

Electronically Signed per Authorization)

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05216-RBL Document 24 Filed 07/11/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RENOTE PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Page 3

 Law Offices of 

 Mann, Johnson, Wooster & McLaughlin, P.S.

 820 A STREET, SUITE 550

 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402

 (253) 572-4161 Tacoma

 (253) 838-1154 Seattle

 (253) 572-4167 Facsimile

Presented by:

MANN, JOHNSON, WOOSTER

& MCLAUGHLIN, P.S.

 /s/ Richard H. Wooster

Richard H. Wooster, WSBA#13752

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Approved as to form:

GORDON, THOMAS, HONEYWELL, MALANCA,

PETERSON & DAHEIM

Per telephonic authority:

 /s/ Warren E. Martin

Warren E. Martin, WSBA# 17235

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 3:06-cv-05216-RBL Document 24 Filed 07/11/07 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        11,268,878
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      23,041
<MORTGAGE>                                      13,392
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              12,713,072
<CASH>                                         831,350
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         478,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,069,151
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                              12,354,556
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,015
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,122,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,069,151
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            400,655
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (14,451)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  26,757
<BENEFITS>                                       1,944
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     46,693
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            28,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,791
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EZEQUIEL ESPINOSA-JIMENEZ, a.k.a.

Daniel Jimenez-Hernandez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10553

D.C. No. 4:12-cr-02316-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Ezequiel Espinosa-Jimenez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for attempted reentry

after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.

FILED

JUL 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Espinosa-Jimenez’s counsel has filed a brief

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Espinosa-Jimenez the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

Espinosa-Jimenez’s motion for an extension of time filed on April 6, 2015,

is denied as moot in the light of the court’s order on the same date granting an

extension sua sponte.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-10553
No. P67/216.

No. P67/217.

#### Astra Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/30483, etc. (New York).

#### Astra Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 66/21854 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise classified as flashlights is similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Astra Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 555, C.D. 2703), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
  Certification
    of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
    Officer
    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
    Act of 2002
  Form 10-K
      /s/  Mitchell
    C. HillMitchell
    C. Hill
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/  Dennis
    K. KnappDennis
    K. Knapp
    Chief Financial Officer   Dated: November 20, 2007
  A signed original of this written statement required by
    Section 906, or other document authenticating,
    acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
    in typed form within the electronic version of this written
    statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
    Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
    Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-mc-00091-RSM-MAT Document 18 Filed 05/23/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WTC
INDUSTRIES, INC. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,457,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,000
<INVENTORY>                                    556,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,067,901
<PP&E>                                       1,808,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                 763,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,114,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,215,904
<BONDS>                                      5,208,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       148,020
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,457,979)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,114,578
<SALES>                                      3,144,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,144,284
<CGS>                                        2,300,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,211,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (512,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (512,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (512,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>