alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, 0. C. 2055!

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

June 21, 2017

Ms. Holly Ostlund
79 Richardson Street
Bath, Maine 04539

Dear Ms. Ostlund:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after consultation with
the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved your request pursuant to
section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to become an institution-affiliated party of State Farm
Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan
holding company (“SLHC”), through employment with an independently owned agency that sells State
Farm insurance products and banking products from State Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary federal
savings bank, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington, Illinois. This approval is
limited to your holding a position with an independently owned agency that sells State Farm and State
Farm Bank products. If you seek to work directly for State Farm or an independently owned agency
that sells products for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), you must obtain the Board’s
approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you to the
Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented could result in a different
conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These representations constitute
conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and decisions herein and, as such, may
be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. Additionally, if you are convicted of, or enter into a
pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or money laundering in
the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC, BHC, or independently owned agency
that sells products for an SLHC or BHC, including agencies that sell State Farm and State Farm Bank
products.

Sincerely,

Margaret McCloskey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board

112 U.S.C. § 1829.
No. 66635.

#### Impecco, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 59/28399, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fishing reels with two spools similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Charles Garcia & Co., Inc.*(48 C.C.P.A. 140, C.A.D. 780), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61160.

protests 260330-K (A), 260424-K, and 259578-K (New York).

#### Charles Garcia & Co., Inc., and Vandegrift Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*407Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-11137

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL DESHAWN HOMER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-141-1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Deshawn Homer appeals the revocation of his supervised 

release and 18-month sentence of imprisonment imposed pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3583(g), which requires the mandatory revocation of supervised 

release and imposition of a term of imprisonment for defendants found to have 

committed certain offenses, including possession of a controlled substance. For 

the following reasons, we affirm.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 23, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-11137 Document: 00515463428 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2020
No. 19-11137

2

First, Homer argues that § 3583(g) is unconstitutional in light of the 

Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Haymond, 139 S. Ct. 2369 (2019), 

because it does not require a jury determination of guilt beyond a reasonable 

doubt. As he concedes, review of this unpreserved issue is for plain error, 

which requires him to show (1) an error that has not been affirmatively waived, 

(2) that is clear or obvious, and (3) that affected his substantial rights. See

Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he can satisfy those three 

prongs, this court has the discretion to correct the error if it seriously affects 

the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See id.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Haymond addressed the 

constitutionality of § 3583(k), and the plurality opinion specifically disclaimed 

expressing any view of the constitutionality of § 3583(g). See Haymond, 139 S. 

Ct. at 2382 n.7. In the absence of precedent from either the Supreme Court or 

this court extending Haymond to § 3583(g), we conclude that there is no clear 

or obvious error. See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135; United States v. Badgett, 957 

F.3d 536, 539-41 (5th Cir. 2020).

Second, to the extent that Homer asserts error related to the § 3583(d) 

drug treatment exception to mandatory revocation under § 3583(g), it is not 

clear that § 3583(d) was applicable in this case. See United States v. Brooker, 

858 F.3d 983, 986 (5th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, he fails to demonstrate any 

clear or obvious error with respect to the district court’s consideration of 

§ 3583(d). See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135.

Third, in light of our deferential abuse-of-discretion standard of review, 

we are unpersuaded that the 18-month sentence, which was seven months 

above the top of the advisory policy statement range, was substantively 

unreasonable. See United States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 332 (5th Cir. 2013). 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-11137 Document: 00515463428 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2020
Exhibit 32.1
 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Salipante, Principal Executive Officer of Keyport Life Insurance Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
* /s/ Robert C. Salipante              ____________

Robert C. Salipante

President

August 14, 2003

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 ("Section 906"), and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this certification is expressly incorporated by reference into any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
No. 51820.

#### Bohemian Distributing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 955139-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Searched for **http://www.healthypeople.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.healthypeople.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
No. 57090.

protests 194880-K and 193729-K (New York).

#### C. L. Huisking & Co., Inc., and Chas. L. Huisking & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Lithol N. F., Icthammol NF” similar in all material respects to the commodity passed upon in *United States*v. *Kachurin Drug Company*(39 C. C. P. A. 36, C. A. D. 459), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12238]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Rembrandt: Etchings From the 
Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Rembrandt: Etchings from the 
Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen'' at the Worcester Art Museum, Worcester, 
Massachusetts, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7003151304191f1e424445493003041104155e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6013050314090f0e525455592013140114054e070f16">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-23425 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 355

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding environmental contamination

and health effects emanating from the former United States military

facilities in the Philippines.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 2000

Mr. UNDERWOOD submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding environmental contamination and health effects emanating from

the former United States military facilities in the Philippines.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 That it is the sense of the Congress that—

4 (1) the Secretary of State, in cooperation with

5 the Secretary of Defense, should work with the Gov6 ernment of the Philippines and with appropriate

7 nongovernmental organizations in the United States

8 and the Philippines to fully identify and share all
2

•HCON 355 IH

1 relevant information concerning environmental con2 tamination and health effects emanating from

3 former United States military facilities in the Phil4 ippines following the departure of United States

5 military forces from the Philippines in 1992; and

6 (2) the United States should work with the

7 Government of the Philippines to help ameliorate the

8 environmental contamination and health effects ema9 nating from former United States military facilities

10 in the Philippines following the departure of United

11 States military forces from the Philippines in 1992.

Æ
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kelly Fielder, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Razor Resources Inc.
      for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Razor Resources Inc.                                                            

Dated: August 13, 2010

| | /s/
      Kelly Fielder                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | Kelly Fielder                                           
| | President, Secretary and Director                       
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer and Principal Financial Officer)                
| | Razor Resources Inc.                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Razor Resources
Inc. and will be retained by Razor Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**1995-  turkey_hatchery_01.13.95turkey_hatchery_02.14.95turkey_hatchery_03.14.95turkey_hatchery_04.13.95turkey_hatchery_05.12.95turkey_hatchery_06.14.95turkey_hatchery_07.14.95turkey_hatchery_08.11.95turkey_hatchery_09.14.95turkey_hatchery_10.13.95turkey_hatchery_11.15.95turkey_hatchery_12.14.95

**
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 1
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 2
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 3
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 4
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 5
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 6
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 7
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 8
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 9
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 10
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 11
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 12
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 13
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 14
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 15
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 16
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 17
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 18
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 19
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 20
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 21
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 22
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 23
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 24
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 25
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 26
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 27
- Seacoast Fortification Preservation Manual 28
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 239

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a technical

correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3194.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Mr. GILMAN (for himself and Mr. GEJDENSON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

The Committee on House Administration discharged; considered and agreed

to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make

a technical correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R.

3194.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 3194), making appropriations for the government of the

4 District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in

5 whole or in part against revenues of said District for the

6 fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other pur7 poses, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall in-
2

•HCON 239 ATH

1 sert before the comma at the end of section 1000(a)(7)

2 of division B the following: ‘‘, except that subsection (c)

3 of section 912 of H.R. 3427 shall be deemed to read as

4 follows:

5 ‘(c) ADVANCE CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—

6 ‘(1) FISCAL YEAR 1998.—Funds made available

7 pursuant to section 911(a)(1) may be obligated and

8 expended beginning on or after December 15, 1999,

9 provided that the appropriate certification has been

10 submitted to the appropriate congressional commit11 tees.

12 ‘(2) FISCAL YEARS 1999 AND 2000.—Funds

13 made available pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of

14 section 911(a) may be obligated and expended only

15 if the appropriate certification has been submitted to

16 the appropriate congressional committees 30 days

17 prior to the payment of the funds’ ’’.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,902-03

EX PARTE DERWIN ALPHONSO RIDDICK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 067663-A IN THE 397TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GRAYSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of evading arrest and drug deliveryand sentenced to imprisonment.

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that he is beingdenied pre-sentence time credit awarded on the judgment.

The trial court finds that it has already awarded the time credit in question. Nonetheless, Applicant

asserts he is not receiving the time credit from prison officials. The habeas record contains two

judgments listing different periods of pre-sentence confinement. It is not clear whether prison

officials received the judgment to which the trial court refers in its findings and whether prison

officials are properly applying the pre-sentence confinement credits listed there. 
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Accordingly, the record

should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General

Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: March 31, 2021

Do not publish
No. 52797.

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States,

protest 921457-G (San Francisco) .

Opinion by

Rao, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any error in the action of the collector, the protest was overruled.
No. 57519.

#### Lord & Taylor *v.*United States,

protest 204480-K (New York).

*257Opinion by

Foed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56124, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Page 1 of 2 

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551 

DIVISION OF BANKING

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

SR 11-6 

March 24, 2011 

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION

 AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

SUBJECT: Guidance on Accepting Accounts from Foreign Embassies, Consulates and 

Missions (foreign missions)

An Interagency1

 Advisory has been issued to supplement SR letter 04-10, “Banking 

Accounts for Foreign Governments, Embassies, and Political Figures.” The supplemental 

advisory provides information to financial institutions regarding the provision of account 

services to foreign missions in a manner that fulfills the needs of those foreign governments 

while complying with the provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). It advises that financial 

institutions are expected to demonstrate the capacity to conduct appropriate risk assessments and 

implement the requisite controls and oversight systems to effectively manage the risk identified

in these relationships with foreign missions. The advisory also confirms that it is the financial 

institution’s decision to accept or reject a foreign mission account. 

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this SR letter, as appropriate, to state member 

banks, bank holding companies, Edge and Agreement Act corporations, and U.S. branches, 

agencies, and representative offices of foreign banking organizations, as well as to their 

supervisory and examination staff. Questions regarding this letter may be directed to Dawn 

Adams, Senior Special Anti-Money Laundering Examiner, at (202) 452-3964, or Suzanne 

Williams, Manager, Compliance Section, at (202) 452-3513. 

Patrick M. Parkinson 

Director

 

1 The Interagency Advisory was issued by the staffs of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the National Credit 

Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Office of Thrift Supervision.
 

Page 2 of 2 

Attachments:

• Interagency Advisory on Accepting Accounts from Foreign Embassies, Consulates and 

Missions

Cross References:

• SR letter 04-10, “Banking Accounts for Foreign Governments, Embassies, and Political 

Figures”