alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72114-72115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 19, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 2, 2023,

[[Page 72115]]

it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add 
Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 69 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-1, CP2024-1.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-23019 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Listof Subsidiaries**

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                   | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Organization** | ** ** | **Names Under Which Subsidiary Does  Business** |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ISI Security Group, Inc.                      |       | Delaware                               |       | Non-operating subsidiary                                            |
| ISI Detention Contracting Group, Inc               |       | Texas                                  |       | ISI Detention Contracting Group                                     |
| Detention Contracting Group, Ltd                   |       | Texas                                  |       | Management operating subsidiary                                     |
| ISI Detention Contracting Group, Inc               |       | California                             |       | PDI                                                                 |
| ISI Detention Contracting Group, Inc               |       | New Mexico                             |       | Non-operating subsidiary                                            |
| ISI Systems, Ltd                                   |       | Texas                                  |       | Non-operating subsidiary                                            |
| ISI Detention Systems                              |       | Texas                                  |       | Non-operating subsidiary                                            |
| ISI Controls, Ltd                                  |       | Texas                                  |       | Metroplex Control Systems                                           |
| Metroplex Control Systems, Inc                     |       | Texas                                  |       | Non-operating subsidiary                                            |
| Metroplex Commercial Fire and Security Alarms, Inc |       | Texas                                  |       | MCS Commercial                                                      |
| MCFSA Ltd                                          |       | Texas                                  |       | MCS and Metroplex Controls Systems Inc                              |
| Com-Tec Security, LLC                              |       | Wisconsin                              |       | Com-Tec Security                                                    |
| Com-Tec California Limited Partnership             |       | Wisconsin                              |       | Com-Tec California                                                  |

 

----
**1998-  turkey_hatchery_12.16.98turkey_hatchery_11.12.98turkey_hatchery_10.15.98turkey_hatchery_09.16.98turkey_hatchery_08.13.98turkey_hatchery_07.15.98turkey_hatchery_06.16.98turkey_hatchery_05.14.98turkey_hatchery_04.15.98turkey_hatchery_03.13.98turkey_hatchery_02.13.98turkey_hatchery_01.14.98

**
SERVED: October 21, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MEYER LABORATORY, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0618 

NOTICE 

Ira Leibowitz, Attorney-Advisor retired on September 30, 2013. 

All future communications should be directed to the undersigned at: 

Richard C. Goodwin, 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, Attn: Room E 11-310 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(Richard. Goodwin@dot. gov) 

Administrative matters should be directed to Patricia Matthews, Staff Assistant (202) 

366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews@{dot.gov) 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
. SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

. Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

Terry Oles, Vice President of Operations 

Meyer Laboratory, IJ).c., Respondent 

2401 NW Jefferson Street 

Blue Springs, MO 64015 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearing;s, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0618 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-Q of LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, I, G. William Evans, Chief Financial Officer of LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (a) | such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                         |  |                     
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------------
|By: |  | /s/ G. William Evans    |  | Date: August 2, 2005
|    |  | G. William Evans        |  |                     
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |                     



47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JOHN WISE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5810 FDB/KLS

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

This civil rights action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. Before the Court is

Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. # 35). Having reviewed the motion and

Plaintiff’s supporting memorandum, the Court finds, for the reasons stated below, that the motion

should be denied.

There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Although the court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), can request counsel to represent a party proceeding

in forma pauperis, the court may do so only in exceptional circumstances. Wilborn v. Escalderon,

789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984);

Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980). A finding of exceptional circumstances requires

an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to

articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Wilborn, 789 F.2d

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 40 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

at 1331.

Plaintiff has demonstrated an adequate ability to articulate his claims pro se and has not

demonstrated that the issues involved in this case are complex or that he has had any difficulties in

expressing them. Plaintiff has brought forth his claims in a clear and organized manner. While

Plaintiff may not have vast resources or legal training, he meets the threshold for a pro se litigant and

the Court finds that counsel is unnecessary in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to appoint

counsel (Dkt. # 35) is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

DATED this 9th day of November, 2006. 

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05810-FDB Document 40 Filed 11/09/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

March 11, 1958

No. 61646.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 306069-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of focusing magnifiers, valued under $25 each, and are properly classified as microscopes, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**1997-  rice_stocks_10.31.97rice_stocks_08.29.97rice_stocks_03.31.97rice_stocks_01.10.97

**
(Reap. Dec. 11096)

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1021128-1/2.

(Decided November 1, 1965)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Judge:

The following appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of guitars exported from Japan subsequent to February 27,1958.

> That guitars are not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27,1958; and that the said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,1958.

> That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

The stipulated facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value is the appraised value, less the buying commission as stated on the invoice.

*664As to all other merchandise included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. P67/222.

#### M. Pressner & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 66/8970 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of miniature pocketknives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Paul E.*Sernau, *Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 514, Abstract 65737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 59297.

protests 199809-K, etc. (New York).

#### Tombarel Products Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**PricewaterhouseCoopers
                  LLP**PricewaterhouseCoopers
                  Center300
                  Madison AvenueNew
                  York NY 10017Telephone
                  (646) 471 3000Facsimile
                  (813) 286 6000






**Report
      of Independent Auditors**




To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholder


of
      JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association:




We
      have
      examined management's assertion about JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
      Association's (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
      identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
      Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") solely as they relate to
      standard VII, Insurance Policies (the "Applicable Standard"), as of and for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying management assertion.
      Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the Applicable
      Standard. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
      about the Company's compliance, solely as it relates to the Applicable Standard
      based on our examination. The Company uses subservicing organizations to perform
      the servicing obligations subject to minimum servicing standards I-VI of USAP.
      We did not examine the Company's compliance with standards I-VI of USAP and,
      accordingly, do not express an opinion thereon.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
      the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
      examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
      Applicable Standard and performing such other procedures as we considered
      necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
      reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
      determination on the Company's compliance with the Applicable
      Standard.




In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the Applicable
      Standard solely as it relates to standard VII, Insurance Policies, as of and
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material
      respects.




**/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**




March
      13,
      2006
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Balance Sheet and Consolidated Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996  
<CASH>                                          12,414
<SECURITIES>                                    13,574
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,445)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,347      
<PP&E>                                          11,374     
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,028)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,103     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,061   
<BONDS>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,863      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,103        
<SALES>                                         32,162         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,162         
<CGS>                                               54         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,164<F1>     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,087<F2>  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   706      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,614      
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,489     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,125     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<FN>

<F1> Includes project personnel and other project expenses excluding loss 
     provision.

<F2> Includes management and administrative support and Incentive Compensation.

</FN>
        
                                  


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No's. 33-37566, 33-40776, 33-61397, and 33-33026) of
Central Newspapers, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 1999 appearing on
page 27 of the Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears
on page 17 of this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
March 17, 1999
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40331

Conference Calendar

 

MICHAEL ANTHONY MOORE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JANIE COCKRELL; STANLEY MELVIN, 

Ad-Seg Major; KELLEE LANGLEY; 

KEVIN LANGLEY; RODNEY COOPER; 

BRIAN RODEEN; ROD WILSON; JOE

SKIPPER; ALLEN POLUNSKY; JIM SHAW; 

JOHN CARRUTHERS; JOE EASLEY; NORRIS

JORDAN; WILLIAM GADDIS; JEFFREY CABE; 

ROBERT BROCK; REGINAL STANLEY; 

CHRIS BEARD; JEFFREY LANN;

JAMES BURGESS; WILLIAM JONES; 

MICHAEL HORN; JUDY MCCOLLUM; 

TIM RANGE; JAMES POOLE; JOAN

RAYBURN; LOAN HOPKINS; JAMES BURNS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CV-50

--------------------

August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Anthony Moore, Texas prisoner number 487939, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as

frivolous. Moore argues that the district court erred in
No. 01-40331

-2-

dismissing his § 1983 suit, and he contends that the district

court should have granted him leave to amend his complaint. 

However, Moore does not explain how the district court erred in

dismissing his complaint without first granting him leave to

amend it. Moore thus has not shown that the district court

abused its discretion in dismissing his suit and declining to

grant him leave to amend his complaint. See Pittman v. Moore,

980 F.2d 994, 994 (5th Cir. 1993); Ashe v. Corley, 992 F.2d 540,

542 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Moore’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus

frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because this appeal lacks merit, it is DISMISSED, and Moore’s

motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2. 

The dismissal of Moore’s complaint as frivolous and the

dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a “strike”

for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We note that

Moore has one other strike against him. See Moore v. Collins,

No. 94-20490 (5th Cir., Jan. 26, 1995). By accumulating three

strikes, Moore is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis in any

subsequent civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated

or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR INVOKED.
No. 60311.

protest 286907-K (New York)

#### Wing Woh Lung Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of spotted fish, packed in lard, which would now be classified at 12% percent under paragraph 720 (b), as modified, *supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.1   Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
               Compliance of Washington Mutual Bank

                             WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The  undersigned  officer of  Washington  Mutual  Bank (the  "Servicer")  hereby
certifies  on behalf of the  Servicer  and on his own behalf for purposes of the
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR7, as follows:

1. I am the duly appointed and qualified Senior Vice President of the Servicer.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Servicer.

4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 1, 2006.




                     WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK


                     By: /s/ Henry J. Berens
                         -------------------------------------
                         Henry J. Berens
                         Senior Vice President