alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re NORTH COAST VILLAGE, LTD., Debtor. John R. Prewitt, Appellant, v. North Coast Village, Ltd., Appellee.

No. 00-55685.

D.C. No. CV-98-1963-L.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 12, 2001.

Decided July 17, 2001.

Before WARDLAW, PAEZ, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant John R. Prewitt appeals the judgment of the United States District Court affirming the judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court disallowing his claim and avoiding his recorded deed of trust pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 544(a). This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291.

We have carefully reviewed the record, the Order Affirming [the] Bankruptcy Court’s Judgment, and the parties’ arguments on appeal. We affirm for the reasons well stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TIMOTHY SCOTT SKEENS

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 19 5

- C R

Appeal from the

394 th District C ourt

of Brewster C ounty, Texas

(TC# CR04606 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fourth m otion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until Ju ne 21 , 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James McDermott

, the Appellant ’s attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before Ju ne 21 , 2019

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19 th day of June , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chugach Electric Association, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 Date: August 6, 2010
/s/ Michael R. CunninghamMichael R. CunninghamChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I, Keith Gollenberg, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CBRE Realty Finance, Inc.; 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC ReleaseNo. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 26, 2007
No. 55700.

protests 156953-K, etc. (New York).

#### Anco Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
May 27 , 2015

To Whom It May Concern,

I would like to thank you again for the a pproval of our 333 Exemption No. 11318 for

Micro Drone Vision, Inc.

At this time we would like to amend our 333 Exemption to include the latest :

1. DJI Phantom 3

2. YUNEEC ’ s : Ty phoon Q 500

, 500+, and 500+Pro

3. W hile add ing “inspection flights” to types of operations.

These requests will have no change to MDV’s Operations, Manual, Training Program, or

maintenance program. This additional Phantom model adds the third in a series o f DJI

Phantom’s already approved.

This addition to Exemption No. 11318 would permit commercial operation by MDV

, using the DJI Phantom 3 and the YUNEEC Typhoon Q 500 , 500+, and 500+Pro to conduct

“ s UAS flight training, agriculture , education, real estate photography

, and videography,

film and movie production, demonstration s, and inspection flights “.

I again would like to thank you for the help you have given in approving MDV’s request

and if you need any additional information please feel free to contact me at 321

- 505

-

2920.

Sincerely,

Bonn i e L. Edwards

Own er and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 223 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 223

      Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding Freedom Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 1999

 Mr. Cox (for himself, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Armey, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Watts of 
 Oklahoma, Mrs. Fowler, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Davis of Virginia, Mr. 
Gilman, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Spence, and Mr. Lantos) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
 Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on International 
 Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

                            November 9, 1999

    The Committees on Government Reform and International Relations 
                  discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
      Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding Freedom Day.

Whereas on November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall was torn down by those whom it had 
        imprisoned;
Whereas the fall of the Berlin Wall has become the preeminent symbol of the end 
        of the Cold War;
Whereas the Cold War, at its essence, was a struggle for human freedom;
Whereas the end of the Cold War was brought about in large measure by the 
        dedication, sacrifice, and discipline of Americans and many other 
        peoples around the world united in their opposition to Soviet Communism;
Whereas freedom's victory in the Cold War against Soviet Communism is the 
        crowning achievement of the free world's long 20th century struggle 
        against totalitarianism; and
Whereas it is highly appropriate to remind Americans, particularly those in 
        their formal educational years, that America paid the price and bore the 
        burden to ensure the survival of liberty on this planet: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a Freedom Day should be celebrated each year in the 
        United States; and
            (2) the United States should join with other nations, 
        specifically including those which liberated themselves to help 
        end the Cold War, to establish a global holiday called Freedom 
        Day.
                                 <all>
```
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 22

Providing that the President should seek a public renunciation by the People’s

Republic of China of any use of force, or threat to use force, against

Taiwan, and that the United States should help Taiwan in case of

threats or a military attack by the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. ANDREWS (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing that the President should seek a public renunciation by the People’s Republic of China of any use of

force, or threat to use force, against Taiwan, and that

the United States should help Taiwan in case of threats

or a military attack by the People’s Republic of China.

Whereas in March of 1996 the political leadership of the People’s Republic of China used provocative military maneuvers, including missile launch exercises in the Taiwan

Strait, in an attempt to intimidate the people of Taiwan

during their historic, free, and democratic presidential

elections;

Whereas the People’s Republic of China refuses to renounce

the use of force against Taiwan;
2

•HCON 22 IH

Whereas the House of Representatives passed a resolution by

a vote of 411–0 in June 1998 urging the President to

seek, during his July 1998 summit meeting in Beijing,

a public renunciation by the People’s Republic of China

of any use of force, or threat of use of force, against

democratic Taiwan;

Whereas senior United States executive branch officials have

called upon the People’s Republic of China to renounce

the use of force against Taiwan;

Whereas the use of force, and the threat to use force, by the

People’s Republic of China against Taiwan threatens

peace and stability in the region;

Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act, enacted in 1979, states

that ‘‘[i]t is the policy of the United States . . . to consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by

other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United

States’’; and

Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act states that it is the policy

of the United States to provide Taiwan with arms of a

defensive character: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the President of the United States should

4 seek a public renunciation by the People’s Republic

5 of China of any use of force, or threat to use force,

6 against Taiwan; and
3

•HCON 22 IH

1 (2) the United States should help Taiwan de2 fend itself in case of threats or a military attack by

3 the People’s Republic of China against Taiwan.

Æ
<PAGE>

Addendum to Loan Agreement of June 23, 1999

                          ADDENDUM TO UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                   Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
                                                              February 28, 2000
                                                                    Page 1 of 1


         THIS IS AN ADDENDUM (the "Addendum") to that certain Unsecured
Promissory Note, dated June 23, 1999 and (the "Note") issued by the
undersigned, BoysToys.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called
"Maker"), wherein the Maker promised to pay to the order of Essex Capital
Holdings, Ltd. (together with all subsequent holders of this Note, hereinafter
called "Payee"), all sums due and owing under the Note.

                                      WHEREAS:

         A.     The Maker and Payee acknowledge and agree that the Maker is
                not in default on any terms or provisions of the Note and the
                Loan Agreement.

         B.     The parties seek to increase the maximum amount of the
                Principal Amount that the Payee is willing to lend to the Maker
                from One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) to One Million Five
                Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) with all such funds to
                be loaned from the Payee to the Maker on the same terms and
                conditions as provided in the Note.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that the principal sum of the
maximum amount that the Payee shall provide Payee under the terms of the Note
shall be increased from One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) to One Million Five
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) and that all other term and provisions
of the Note, as originally written shall remain and shall be given full force
and effect as if written the date first written above.

         This Addendum to the Note shall be binding upon Maker and its
successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of Payee and its
successors and assigns.

         All notices required or permitted in connection with this Note shall
be given at the place and address as separately provided by each party to
this Note.

         This Addendum to the Note shall be governed by and construed
according to the laws of the State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF,these presents are executed as of the date first
written above.

                                       MAKER:

                                       BOYSTOYS.COM, INC.
                                       (a Delaware corporation)



                                       By: /s/ Ralph M. Amato
                                          --------------------------------
                                           Ralph M. Amato, President & CEO


Acknowledgement: [ILLEGIBLE]
                ----------------------------------
                 For: Essex Capital Holdings, Ltd.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 19, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 13, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 5 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2024-11, CP2024-11.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-23018 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of SpinCycle, Inc. of our report dated March
13, 1998 relating to the financial statements of SpinCycle, Inc., which appears
in such prospectus. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Prospectus.
 
                                          /s/  PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Price Waterhouse LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
June 22, 1998
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

July 28, 2017

Ms. Angela Sowell
211 East Dumble
Alvin, Texas 77511

Dear Ms. Sowell:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after
consultation with the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved your
request pursuant to section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to become an institution-
affiliated party of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”),
Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan holding company (“SLHC”), through employment with
an independently owned agency that sells State Farm insurance products and banking products
from State Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary federal savings bank, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State
Farm Bank”), Bloomington, Illinois. This approval is limited to your holding a position with an
independently owned agency that sells State Farm and State Farm Bank products. If you seek to
work directly for State Farm or an independently owned agency that sells products for another
SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), you must obtain the Board’s approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you to
the Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented could result in a
different conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These representations
constitute conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and decisions herein
and, as such, may be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. Additionally, if you are
convicted of, or enter into a pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach
of trust, or money laundering in the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC,
BHC, or independently owned agency that sells products for an SLHC or BHC, including
agencies that sell State Farm and State Farm Bank products.

Sincerely,

Margaret teCloskey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board

112 U.S.C. § 1829.
# C_2014431EN.01002302.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2014 — Röchling Oertl Kunststofftechnik v Commission

(Case T-286/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - National support for the generation of renewable electricity - Commission decision to open the State aid formal investigation procedure - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case))

(2014/C 431/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Röchling Oertl Kunststofftechnik GmbH (Brensbach, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz and B. Wißmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to suspend the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened the State aid formal investigation procedure concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
No. 56218.

protests 175404-K, etc. (New York).

#### Charles A. Andres et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.