alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs
PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS
--------------------------------
www.sealebeers.com


       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
       --------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Raven Gold Corp. (An
Exploration Stage Company) of our report dated August 12, 2010 on our audit
of the financial statements of Raven Gold Corp. (An Exploration Stage
Company) as of April 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, and since inception (February 9, 2005)
through April 30, 2010, and the reference to us under the caption "Experts."



/s/ Seale and Beers, CPAs
-------------------------
    Seale and Beers, CPAs
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    August 13, 2010


        Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB & CPAB Registered Auditors
            50 S. Jones Blvd Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107
               Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax: (888)782-2351


<PAGE>
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 280

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 11, 2000

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics

Law Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the

Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 280 RFS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL

2 OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

3 THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

4 On June 2, 2000, or on such other date as the Speak5 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

6 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des7 ignate, the 2000 District of Columbia Special Olympics

8 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred

9 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

10 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

11 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum12 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co13 lumbia.

14 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

15 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

16 may be necessary to carry out the event.

17 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA18 TIONS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

20 for physical preparations for the event.

21 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

22 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce23 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

24 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con25 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations
3

•HCON 280 RFS

1 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli2 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
(THIS SPACE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK)






















<PAGE>

                        SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C.  20549

                                    FORM 10-QSB

[ X ]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
       EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

       For the quarterly period ended February 29, 2000

OR

[   ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
       EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

       For the transition period from         to

Commission  file  number                        0-25489

                         NEVADA  STAR  RESOURCE  CORP.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Yukon  Territory  Canada                              91-0239195

(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation       (I.R.S. Employer
 or organization)                                   Identification  No.)

10735  Stone  Avenue  North
Seattle,  WA                                                       98133
(Address  of  principal  executive  offices)                    (Zip  Code)

                             (206)  367-2525
          (Issuer's  telephone  number,  including  area  code)

Check  whether  the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13  or  15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period  that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.  Yes  No  (X)

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity,  as  of  the  latest  practicable  date.                      28,511,430

Transitional  Small  Business  Disclosure  Format  (check  one); Yes ( )  No (X)


















<PAGE>

                           NEVADA  STAR  RESOURCE  CORP.
                                   FORM 10-QSB
             FOR  THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED  NOVEMBER  30,  1999


                         PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The  Registrant  falls  within  the  provisions  of  Rule  13a-13(c)(2)  of  the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934, as amended, and claims exemption thereunder
from  the  requirement  to  file  Part  I.

                            PART II OTHER INFORMATION

All  Items  Omitted  As  Not  Applicable.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, the
registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed on its behalf by the
undersigned  thereunto  duly  authorized.


     NEVADA  STAR  RESOURCE  CORP.


BY:  /s/ Monty D. Moore                            Date:  April 13, 2000
---------------------------------------------             ---------------
Monty  D.  Moore,  President
and  Principal Financial  Officer
Opinion issued January 10, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-01113-CV

———————————

JUAN LORENZO GONZALEZ AND MALISSA MOORE, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF J.G., J.G., J.G. AND A.G., MINORS, Appellants

V.

REGULATORY CONSULTANTS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-72417

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Juan Lorenzo Gonzalez and Malissa Moore, Individually and as 

Next Friend of J.G., J.G., J.G. and A.G., Minors, have filed an unopposed motion 

to dismiss this appeal. Appellants state that they no longer wish to pursue this 

appeal and further request that all costs be assessed against the party incurring the 
2

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1), (d). No other party 

has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal, with costs to be

taxed against the party who incurred the same. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (d), 43.2(f). We 

dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Lloyd.
No. 52403.

protests 119038-K and 119645-K (New York).

#### Montgomery Ward & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same une in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States v. Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained. sv. ent der
#### Consolidated Rendering Company et als. *vs.*Matthew W. McManus, Receiver of First National Bank of Van Buren.

Aroostook.

Opinion, May 4, 1939.

*Pendleton*& *Rogers,*for plaintiffs.

*M. P. Roberts,*for defendant.

*193Sitting: Dunn, C. J., Sturgis, Barnes, Thaxtek, Hudson, Manser, JJ.

Dunn, C. J.

The defendant is receiver of a national bank in process of liquidation. The laws of the United States permit the bringing, in some instances, of suits against national banks whose affairs-are being wound up, or the receivers of such banks, in state courts. *Allen*v. *United States,*285 F., 678, 682; *First National Bank*v. *Pahquioque*Bank, 14 Wall., 383, 20 Law Ed., 840.

For example, it would be competent to ascertain, in a state court, the nature and extent of the interest asserted or sought to be acquired, in specific assets in a receiver’s hands. *Earle*v. *Conway,*178 U. S., 456, 20 S. Ct., 918, 44 Law Ed., 1149.

On what principle the jurisdiction in the present case is insisted, we are quite at a loss to know; the plaintiff’s brief is devoted wholly to what is contended to be the merits of the controversy. But we must suppose jurisdiction is claimed on the ground that the receiver, who appeared and answered the bill, could, in a situation like this, within his competency, submit himself, in the exercise of responsibilities confided to him, to the control of the court.

As a general rule, where the court has not jurisdiction of the cause of action or subject matter in a case, such jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent or agreement. *State*v. *Bonney,*34 Me., 223; *Powers*v. *Mitchell,*75 Me., 364.

The ruling purpose of the instant proceeding was to extinquish certain interests or relationships concerning particular real estate, the record title of which the bank holds, and, on transfer of the property to a trustee, to be chosen and appointed by this court, subject such property to other and different interests, relationships, and likewise incumbrances. That is not permissible. *Earle*v. *Pennsylvania,*178 U. S., 449, 20 S. Ct. 915, 44 Law Ed., 1146; *Earle*v. *Conway,*supra.

The bill alleges no ground for the exercise of the equitable jurisdiction of the court.

The bill is dismissed with costs.

*It is so ordered.*
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00537

- CR Donald Martin MOORE , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR5878 Honorable Mark Luitjen, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 25, 2019
DIS MISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “ this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Th e clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss thi s appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).04

- 19

- 00537

- CR

- 2

- On August 14, 2019, we notified Appel lant that this appeal would be dismissed under Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by September 3, 2019. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). To date, no response has been filed. Absent an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the righ t of appeal, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 613; Daniels , 110 S.W.3d at 176. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
D O NOT PUBLISH
**1996-  turkey_hatchery_12.13.96turkey_hatchery_11.15.96turkey_hatchery_10.15.96turkey_hatchery_09.13.96turkey_hatchery_08.13.96turkey_hatchery_07.15.96turkey_hatchery_06.14.96turkey_hatchery_05.14.96turkey_hatchery_04.15.96turkey_hatchery_03.14.96turkey_hatchery_02.14.96turkey_hatchery_01.16.96

**
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-138226) and Form S-3 (No. 333-147721) of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 12, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of CadencePharmaceuticals, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 12, 2009
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1





                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated
January 15, 1997 appearing on page 56 of Phelps Dodge Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule
which appears on page 54 of such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.



/s/Price Waterhouse LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
September 24, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,919
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             926
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                17,181
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     93,965
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,283
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,987
<LOANS>                                        226,571
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,485
<DEPOSITS>                                     291,129
<SHORT-TERM>                                    36,670
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,598
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,025
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 349,485
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,853
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,441
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   318
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,612
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,084
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,528
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,082
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,082
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,576
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.71
<LOANS-NON>                                        421
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,511
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        6
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,905
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,383
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            522


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Technology Solutions Company.
 Date: November 14, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ MICHAEL R. GORSAGEMichael R. GorsageChief Executive Officer
Before the First Division,

September 30, 1955

No. 59319.

petition 7178-R (New York).

#### Wyler Watch Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

From the record, it appeared that a demonstrator was sent free of charge to the petitioner to demonstrate how certain watches work, with the option that the petitioner could either pay for it or return it, entry being made on that basis. The appraiser accepted the entered value, appraising the merchandise within 6 days. Thereafter, the petitioner, on a trip to Switzerland, was notified that a charge would be made for the blueprints for making up the advertising demonstrator, if only one were ordered, but that, if a number were ordered, the cost for the demonstrator of 400 Swiss francs would be included in the bill. The petitioner notified the exporter that it would have to bill “all together” and include the blueprint in the first cost. On the petitioner’s return, the appraiser was notified of the facts, but it was too late to amend the entry. At the petitioner’s request, the appraiser asked the collector to appeal, since he had 60 days and the petitioner’s time had expired. Petitioner sent a check to the collector, which he returned because the case was on appeal. Counsel for the plaintiff stated that in *United States*v. *Wyler Watch Agency, Inc.*(32 Cust. Ct. 605, Reap. Dec. 8298) “the court handed down a decision exactly what we gave to them, and we paid the same money that we attempted to pay, but we couldn’t do it that way, and that demonstrator we returned back to Switzerland, but we are just paying duty on something sent to us as a present, and that is all it was.” On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
# Official Journal C 359A/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2011.359.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 359A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 549 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2011.359.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 359A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 549 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2011/C 359A/01 | Call for expressions of interest — Contract staff (function groups III and IV) in the buildings field | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2011/C 359A/01

Call for expressions of interest — Contract staff (function groups III and IV) in the buildings field

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | (BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV) |
| 142 | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | (EN/IT/MT/SV) |
| 155 | (EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 162 | |
| 169 | (EN) |
| 177 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (BG/RO) |
| 181 | (DA) |
| 183 | (SL) |
| 185 | |
| 193 | (BG/RO) |
| 198 | (CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK) |
| 206 | (CS/ES/LV/MT/SV) |
| 208 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 221 | |
| 222 | (BG/RO) |
| 223 | |
| 229 | |
| 257 | |
| 258 | |
| 270 | |
| 271 | |
| 278 | (EN) |
| 279 | (FR) |
| 281 | (DA) |
| 284 | (DE) |
| 285 | (LT) |
| 286 | (NL) |
| 292 | (RO) |
| 294 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 303 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 304 | (DA/EN) |
| 307 | |
| 309 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 312 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 315 | |
| 321 | (EN/FR) |
| 324 | |
| 330 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 334 | |
| 336 | (EL/EN/ET/FI/FR/GA/HU/IT) |
| 339 | |
| 344 | |
| 350 | |
| 351 | (EN/FR) |
| 359 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

135

140

(BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV)

142

146

147

(EN/IT/MT/SV)

155

(EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

156

157

162

169

(EN)

177

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(BG/RO)

181

(DA)

183

(SL)

185

193

(BG/RO)

198

(CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK)

206

(CS/ES/LV/MT/SV)

208

(DE/EN/FR)

221

222

(BG/RO)

223

229

257

258

270

271

278

(EN)

279

(FR)

281

(DA)

284

(DE)

285

(LT)

286

(NL)

292

(RO)

294

(DE/EN/FR)

303

(DE/EN/FR)

304

(DA/EN)

307

309

(DE/EN/FR)

312

(DE/EN/FR)

315

321

(EN/FR)

324

330

(DE/EN/FR)

334

336

(EL/EN/ET/FI/FR/GA/HU/IT)

339

344

350

351

(EN/FR)

359

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ISMAEL JUAN ACEVEDO-GONZALEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-615M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: December 20, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

Case 2:05-cr-00460-RSL Document 8 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will 

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 20th day of December, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00460-RSL Document 8 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 2