alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 51492.

#### Protests 122470-K, etc., of Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of the various barrels, casks, packages, etc., was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination, because of breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gaugers’ returns as verified by the affidavits of the importers. The protests were sustained to this extent.
d+,3€o sr4, 

2. fi"& UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a=" ATLANTAFEDERALCENTER REGION 4 

% oe 61 FORSYTH STREET '%( ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

Ms. Trudy Fisher 

Executive Director 

Mississippi Department of 

Environmental Quality 

P. 0. Box 2261 

Jackson, Mississippi 39225-226 1 

Dear Ms. Fisher: 

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's FY 2009 Air Pollution 

Control grant authorized by 5 105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's 

various grant commitments and their status. Since there were no issues, your report is now 

finalized and the grant has been closed out. This letter documents the coilclusion of the joint 

evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.1 15 and identified as a 

commitment in your FY 2009 Air Planning Agreement under Cross Cutting Issues. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2009 and look forward to working with 

you in FY 2010 and future years to continue our joint efforts to protect and improve air quality. 

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (404) 562-9097 or Angela Isom at 

(404) 562-9092. 

Sincerely, 

Douglas Neeley 

Chief 

Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch 

Enclosure 

Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable .Printed wnh Vegetable Od Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Mlnimum 30% Postconsumer)
Case No. 6,541.

#### HITCHEN et al. v. WILSON et al.

[1 Brunner, Col. Cas. 253; 1 4 Hall, Law J. 275.]

Circuit Court, D. Maryland.

May Term, 1812.

Seamen’s Wageb.

Where a vessel had been captured and condemned, and pending an appeal was restored, *held,*that the seamen were entitled to full wages.

[Appeal from the district court of the Unit-' ed States for the district of Maryland.]

This was a libel [by Benjamin Hitchen and others against William Wilson & Sons] for wages. The vessel had been captured and condemned. Pending the appeal she was restored to the underwriters, to whom she had been abandoned upon a compro--mise. The defendants were willing to pay the seamen’s wages, after deducting the expense of recovering the property. But the district- court decreed full wages; and the sentence was affirmed in this court.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 12, 2007 | By:                */s/*                Xiong Junhong |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Xiong                Junhong                          |
|                                | Chief                Executive Officer                |

----
No. 65265.

#### Calvaire et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/30303, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Technology Solutions Company.
 Date:  August 15, 2005
    By:
    /s/ SANDOR GROSZSandor GroszChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.3

                   OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING COMPLIANCE

                          USAA AUTO OWNER TRUST 2005-2

                         3.42%, $183,000,000 CLASS A-1,

                         3.80%, $191,000,000 CLASS A-2,

                         4.00%, $332,000,000 CLASS A-3,

                         4.17%, $130,469,000 CLASS A-4,

                           4.60%, $26,760,233 CLASS B

                    AUTOMOBILE LOAN PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES

      The undersigned individual, a duly authorized officer of USAA Federal
Savings Bank (the "Servicer"), acting on behalf of the Servicer, hereby
CERTIFIES on behalf of the Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10(a) of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of June 1, 2005, as follows:

      1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period January
            1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, and of its performance under the
            Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision, and

      2.    To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, the
            Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations in all material respects
            under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                        USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
                                        ("Servicer")

                                        By: /s/ EDWIN T. MCQUISTON
                                            ----------------------
                                            Edwin T. McQuiston
                                            Title:  Vice President

                                        Date: March 28, 2006
# Official Journal C 82/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.082.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 82 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5521 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.082.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 82

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5521 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 082/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2012/C 082/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6487 — Mitsui/Sanyo/Musco/Navyug Special Steel) (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 082/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2012/C 082/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6487 — Mitsui/Sanyo/Musco/Navyug Special Steel) (1)

5

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2012/C 082/03 | Council Decision of 19 March 2012 renewing the term of office of the Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office | 6 |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 082/04 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2012/C 082/03

Council Decision of 19 March 2012 renewing the term of office of the Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office

6

European Commission

2012/C 082/04

Euro exchange rates

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 082/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6472 — Groupe Bolloré/CMA CGM/Terminal du Grand Ouest) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 082/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6472 — Groupe Bolloré/CMA CGM/Terminal du Grand Ouest) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Peter Toscano, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of International Power Group, Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date:  September 15, 2006 /s/ Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoseTechnologies, Inc. (the “***Company***”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, George J. Vergis, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                  | /s/ George J. Vergis |   |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|                                  |                 |
| George J. Vergis                      |                 |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |                 |
|                                  |                 |
|                                  |                 |
| Date:                                 | 5/8/08               |
|                                       |                      |        |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,218
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,737
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,125
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,746
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,297
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,460
<LOANS>                                        119,840
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,792
<DEPOSITS>                                     160,345
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,122
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 178,792
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,387
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   408
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,137
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,433
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,470
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,667
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      503
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,001
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,001
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     8.3
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,121
<LOANS-PAST>                                       774
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   733
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      136
<RECOVERIES>                                        57
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,157
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,157
        


</TABLE>
No. 60638.

#### Rambusch Decorating Co. and General Shipping & Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 275735-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wood figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58592, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 64666.

#### Boland Mfg. Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/9958, 59/15821, and 58/18125 (Laredo).

Opinion by

Moilison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of carrizo baskets tbe same in all material respects as those tbe subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00512-RSM Document 1 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 14 of 14
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 20-2072

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Antonio Donnel Johnson, also known as Pig

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________ 

Submitted: April 12, 2021

Filed: July 7, 2021 

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Antonio D.Johnson pled guilty to unlawfully possessing a firearm in violation 

of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 922(g)(9), and 924(a)(2). The district court1 sentenced 

1

The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern 

District of Iowa.
-2- 

him to 60 months in prison. He appeals his conviction. Having jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The district court set Johnson’s base offense level at 20 pursuant to U.S.S.G. 

§ 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) because he had a prior “controlled substance offense” for 

possessing marijuana with intent to deliver, in violation of Iowa Code §§ 

124.401(1)(d) and 124.204(m). The guidelines range was 70 to 87 months. The 

court varied downward, sentencing Johnson to 60 months.

Johnson believes his Iowa conviction is not a controlled substance offense. 

This court reviews de novo. See United States v. Williams, 926 F.3d 966, 969 (8th 

Cir. 2019). There is no merit to this argument. A “controlled substance offense” is

a state or federal offense, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, 

that prohibits, among other things, the manufacture or distribution of a “controlled 

substance.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b). The includes “aiding and abetting, conspiring, 

and attempting to commit such offenses.” Id., comment. (n.1). 

Johnson argues the Iowa statue is overbroad because it includes aiding, 

abetting, conspiracy, and attempt. Eighth Circuit precedent precludes this argument.

This court has held that “U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment. (n.1), is a reasonable 

interpretation of the career offender guidelines that is well within the Sentencing 

Commission’s statutory authority.” United States v. Mendoza-Figueroa, 65 F.3d 

691, 694 (8th Cir. 1995). See United States v. Garcia, 946 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 

2019) (holding that a prior conviction for aiding and abetting the distribution of meth

is a controlled substance offense). This court also has held a conviction under Iowa

Code § 124.401(1)(d) is a controlled substance offense. See United States v. 

Clayborn, 951 F.3d 937, 940 (8th Cir. 2020) (rejecting the argument that a 

conviction under Iowa Code § 124.401(1)(d) is overbroad because it includes aiding, 

abetting, and conspiring).

The district court did not err in finding Johnson had a prior controlled 

substance offense.
-3- 

* * * * * * *

 

The judgment is affirmed. 

______________________________
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed January 28 , 2015

. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00092

- CV

IN RE LINDA J. HART , Relator
Original Proceeding in the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas Dallas County, Texas


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Fillmore By letter dated January 22, 2015 , relator notified this C ourt of he r complaints concerning
various actions by the Dallas County D istrict C lerk’s office

. 1 She requested that the deputy
clerks of whom she complains be recused. We treat the letter as a petition for writ of mandamus.
Texas courts of appeals have been granted limited original jurisdiction. See T EX

. G OV ' T

C ODE A NN

. § 22.221 (West 2004 ) . We are granted mandamus jurisdiction over a district clerk
only when the actions of the district clerk interfere with the exercise of this Court ’ s appellate
jurisdiction. In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.)

. Relator’s petition does not allege any action that constitutes interference with this C ourt’s
appellate jurisdiction.

1 Relator names the Dallas County Sheriff’ s D epartment as a party to her petition but her petition does not appear to raise any complaints regarding the actions of the Sheriff’s Department . In any event, the Court lacks jurisdiction to grant a petition for writ of mandamus against the Dallas County S heriff o r her staff. Silva v. Klevenhagen, 833 S.W.2d 746, 747 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus to sheriff because he was not judge of district or county court and wri t was not necessary to enforce jurisdiction of court of appeals).– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.

150092F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CARLOS ANTONIO HOLCOMBE

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 7

- 00008

- CR

Appeal from the

41 st District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 20160D02495 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until

January 4

, 201 8

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

STATE ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza , the State ’s Attorney, prepare the

State ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 4 , 201 8

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20 th day of November , 201 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez , and Palafox , JJ.