alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 277 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 277

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 277

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on 
June 24, 2000, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, and 
solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be 
carried out under this resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Official Journal C 210/15 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 210 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6615 June 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 210

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6615 June 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2023/C 210/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management – Section I: European Parliament – Financial year 2022 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2023/C 210/01

Report on budgetary and financial management – Section I: European Parliament – Financial year 2022

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
      CODE)





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officers of SHINE MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP., a Delaware corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:





(1)
      the
      10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




SHINE
              MEDIA
              ACQUISITION CORP.Date:
              April 15, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              David Y. ChenDavid
              Y. ChenChief
              Executive Officer
# C_2009002EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 247 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 247

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the importance of organ, 
 tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and supporting National Donor 
                                  Day.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 247

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas more than 70,000 individuals await organ transplants at any given 
        moment;
Whereas another man, woman, or child is added to the national organ transplant 
        waiting list every 16 minutes;
Whereas, despite the progress in the last 15 years, more than 10 people per day 
        die because of a shortage of donor organs;
Whereas almost everyone is a potential organ, tissue, and blood donor;
Whereas transplantation has become an element of mainstream medicine that 
        prolongs and enhances life;
Whereas, for the third consecutive year, a coalition of health organizations is 
        joining forces for National Donor Day;
Whereas the first two National Donor Days raised a total of nearly 17,000 units 
        of blood, added over 2,400 potential donors to the National Marrow Donor 
        Program Registry, and distributed tens of thousands of organ and tissue 
        pledge cards;
Whereas National Donor Day is America's largest one-day organ, tissue, bone 
        marrow, and blood donation event; and
Whereas a number of businesses, foundations, health organizations, and the 
        Department of Health and Human Services have designated February 12, 
        2000, as National Donor Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideas of National Donor Day;
            (2) encourages all Americans to learn about the importance 
        of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and to 
        discuss such donation with their families and friends; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 14, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Remarks to the Federal Reserve July 7, 1999 

Dennis Flynn 

68 New Athol Road 

Petersham, MA 01366 

Tel. (978) 724 - 3393 

Sirs: 

In a recent transaction with Fleet Bank, I believe Fleet Bank violated Federal guidelines and possibly, 

Federal Law, in processing a Government secured mortgage product. 

I was denied the right to negotiate a favorable interest rate according to Veterans Administration 

guidelines. Fleet Bank did not even take my application at the time I applied for the loan. My mortgage 

application consisted of approximately 40 pages of faxed documents. These were faxed to the Rhode Island 

office of Fleet Bank a week after what was to be the closing date. 

In processing this VA Mortgage Fleet Bank violated their internal guidelines, they violated Veterans 

Administration Guidelines, and quite possibly violated Federal Law. 

I am just one Veteran who went to Fleet Bank to get a loan under the G.I. Bill. Am I the only Veteran 

that had this type of experience with Fleet Bank? The Federal Reserve, the Veterans Adminstration, and the 

Veteran population will never know, unless you gentlemen take the time to send these concerns on to the 

proper Authorities.
Before the Third Division,

January 4, 1949

No. 52783.

#### Jack Shaw *v.*United States,

protest 139073-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Counsel for the Government stated that the furniture in question had been re-exported to the country of origin on April 26, 1948; that it had remained in customs custody during the entire period; that plaintiff had stated that he wished to abandon the case; and that the only thing which worried him was whether the abandonment would affect his application for drawback. Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20551

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

June 21, 2017

Ms. Joyce Leal
14035 Bradley Road
Atascosa, Texas 78002

Dear Ms. Leal:

The General Counsel, acting pursuant to delegated authority, and after consultation with
the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, has approved your request pursuant to
section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act! to become an institution-affiliated party of State Farm
Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), Bloomington, Illinois, a savings and loan
holding company (“SLHC”), through employment with an independently owned agency that sells State
Farm insurance products and banking products from State Farm’s wholly owned subsidiary federal
savings bank, State Farm Bank, f.s.b. (“State Farm Bank”), Bloomington, Illinois. This approval is
limited to your holding a position with an independently owned agency that sells State Farm and State
Farm Bank products. If you seek to work directly for State Farm or an independently owned agency
that sells products for another SLHC or bank holding company (“BHC”), you must obtain the Board’s
approval to do so.

This action is based on all the facts of record and representations made by you to the
Board in connection with your request. Any change in the facts presented could result in a different
conclusion and should be reported immediately to Board staff. These representations constitute
conditions imposed in writing in connection with the findings and decisions herein and, as such, may
be enforced in proceedings under applicable law. Additionally, if you are convicted of, or enter into a
pretrial diversion program for, a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or money laundering in
the future, you must again seek approval to work for any SLHC, BHC, or independently owned agency
that sells products for an SLHC or BHC, including agencies that sell State Farm and State Farm Bank
products.

Sincerely,
iY Mt MN Sha

Margar cCloskey Shanks
Deputy Secretary of the Board

112 U.S.C. § 1829.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco OLEA-PINO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10031.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 2005.

Sue P. Fahami, USRE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Michael K. Powell, Esq., FPDNV-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Reno, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The Supreme Court vacated our judgment entered October 26, 2004, and remanded for further consideration in light of *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Olea-Pino’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his sentencing enhancement, based on a prior aggravated felony, remains foreclosed after *Booker. See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*No. 03-30387, 2005 WL 1560269, *8 n. 8 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005) (explaining that a district judge’s enhancing a sentence based on the fact of a prior *682conviction does not raise any Sixth Amendment problems).

Because Olea-Pino was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, id.,*at *9 (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional *Booker*error).

REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
---

Exhibit 99.11



Phillip Hellman

Hellman & Schofield

Level 4, 46 Edward Street

Brisbane

Queensland 4000



Phone (business hrs):  (61) 7 3102 9393







CONSENT OF AUTHOR



TO:

The British Columbia Securities Commission

The Alberta Securities Commission

The Ontario Securities Commission

The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)



I, Phillip Hellman, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled, Baja Mining Corp.  An Updated Preliminary Assessment of the El Boleo Copper Cobalt Project,of the El Boleo Project located in Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico and dated January 31, 2007 (the Technical Report) and filed in March 2007. In addition, I do hereby consent that any extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report may be filed with any stock exchange, any other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the publicly accessible company files on their websites.





Dated this 10th day of March, 2007











/s/ Phillip Hellman____________

Phillip Hellman





---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.6



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of Osage Systems Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 10,
1999 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Osage Systems Group,
Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for the years then ended, appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Osage Systems Group, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998.



/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP           
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

May 10, 1999
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 177-2 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 177-2 Filed 11/01/12 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00157-MJP Document 177-2 Filed 11/01/12 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                    CONSENT OF THE COIN LAUNDRY ASSOCIATION
 
   
     The Coin Laundry Association hereby consents to all references made to it
and to all facts and figures in the 1997 survey conducted on behalf of and
published by the Coin Laundry Association in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of SpinCycle, Inc. (Registration No. 333-57883), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 1998.
    
 
                                          Coin Laundry Association
 
                                          By /s/ GEORGE PISTONA
 
                                            ------------------------------------
                                          Name George Pistona
                                          Title   Deputy Executive Director
 
Coin Laundry Association
Downers Grove, Illinois
   
October 19, 1998
    
 
                                        2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                   SUBSIDIARIES OF RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION


RSC Holdings Inc. (Delaware)

RSC Acquisition Corporation (Delaware)

Wholly owned subsidiaries of RSC Holdings Inc.:

   RSC Industrial Corporation (Delaware)
   Acme Duval, Inc. (Delaware)
   Acme Rents, Inc. (California)

Wholly owned subsidiaries of RSC Acquisition Corporation:

   Acme Alabama, Inc. (Alabama)
   The Air & Pump Company, Inc. (Texas)
   Walker Jones Equipment, Inc. (Mississippi)
In the Senate of the United States,

May 9, 2000.

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. Con. Res. 277) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolution authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

1 Page 3, line 10, after ‘‘sales,’’ insert: advertisements,

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 277

AMENDMENT
April 16, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF T.M., A CHILD

NO. 14-14-00948-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights, signed 

November 26, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court 

below AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                   HOLOPAK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS
                                                         ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                      1997              1996
                                                      ----              ----
<S>                                                <C>                <C>      
Weighted Average Number of
     Common  Shares Outstanding                    3,347,689          3,347,689

Common Share Equivalents Based
     Upon the Treasury Stock Method
                                                          --             25,043

Total Common Shares and
     Common  Share Equivalents
     Outstanding                                   3,347,689          3,372,732
                                                   ---------         ----------

Earnings Per Common Share and
     Common Share Equivalents:

Net Income                                         $    0.00         ($    0.07)
                                                   =========         ==========
</TABLE>


                                       10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JERRY D. SMITH, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C06-898-RSM-MJB

)

v. )

)

WASHINGTON STATE ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Monroe Correctional Center pursuant to a 2004 King

County Superior Court judgment and sentence. He has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he asserts that the Washington Department of Corrections is holding Jerry

D. Smith in place of JERRY DEAN SMITH. Petitioner contends that Jerry D. Smith, whom he

identifies as the “secured party,” is a “flesh and blood man,” and that JERRY DEAN SMITH, whom

he identifies as the “debtor,” is a corporate fiction. (Id.) Petitioner appears to claim that he is entitled

to release from custody because the party who is currently incarcerated is real, but the party who was

convicted in King County Superior Court is a fiction. Petitioner’s claim is frivolous.

Case 2:06-cv-00898-RSM Document 3 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE - 2

Section 2254(a) provides that the “district court shall entertain an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the

ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.”

Petitioner does not allege that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution, nor does he offer any

coherent argument demonstrating that he is in custody in violation of any laws or treaties of the United

States. 

Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts,

a habeas corpus petition may be summarily dismissed if it plainly appears from the face of the petition

and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court. Because

petitioner’s claims is frivolous, the Court should dismiss petitioner’s federal habeas petition with

prejudice. A proposed Order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00898-RSM Document 3 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 25

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

in honor of the United States Masters Swimming program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. ENGLISH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued in honor of the United States Masters

Swimming program.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued in honor

4 of the United States Masters Swimming program;

5 and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 306 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 306

     To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic Leader.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 15 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

    Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was submitted

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic Leader.

    Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby tendered to the 
distinguished Democratic Leader, the Senator from South Dakota, the 
Honorable Thomas A. Daschle, for his exemplary leadership and the 
cooperative and dedicated manner in which he has performed his 
leadership responsibilities in the conduct of Senate business during 
the second session of the 105th Congress.
                                 <all>
```