alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Yinfang Yang, certify that:





1. I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K of Oregon Gold, Inc.





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





(Registrant)

OREGON GOLD, INC.By:

/s/ Yinfang YangYinfang Yang, CEODate:

March 31, 2010
<Page>



                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.42


[THE FIRST MARBLEHEAD                       THE FIRST MARBLEHEAD CORPORATION
CORPORATION LOGO]
                                            30 Little Harbor
                                            Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945
                                            TEL. 781.639.2000 or 800.895.4283
                                            FAX 781.639.4583
                                            E-MAIL gate@gateloan.com

Mr. Ralph James
Mostyn Street                               Park Avenue Atrium
Swampscott, Massachusetts                   237 Park Avenue, 21st Floor
                                            New York, New York 10017
Dear Ralph:                                 TEL. 212.551.3650 FAX 212.551.1781

Each of us has been more pleased with the contributions which you have made
to First Marblehead since you joined the firm in the Fall of 1996. In partial
recognition, we would be pleased to take the following action.

As you know, we have recently purchased 31,788 additional shares of FMC
common stock (the Stock) at $20. per share. Robert James advanced the
$635,760 necessary to do so, in partnership with us. Our arrangement with Bob
is that, upon the sale of the Stock, he will be entitled to the sale proceeds
up to a sale price of $30 per share. The balance of the sale proceeds, if
any, will be divided 50% to Bob and 50% to one of us. Our agreement with Bob
contemplates that we may assign all or part of our interest to a third party.

By this letter, we are confirming to you that each of us is assigning one
half of our remaining interest in the upside value of the Stock to you. As an
example, if the Stock were sold for $40 per share, Bob would be entitled to
the first $30 plus 50% of the balance, or a total of $35. The remaining $5
would be split, $2.50 to you and $2.50 to one of us.

We look forward with great confidence to a productive business future and to
your ongoing partnership with us.


Respectfully,

/s/ Stephen Anbinder
----------------------------------
Stephen Anbinder


/s/ Daniel Maxwell Meyers
----------------------------------
Daniel Maxwell Meyers


cc: R. Hoffman, Esq.
Case No. 6,681.

#### HOGAN v. BROWN.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 75.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1802.

Slander — Naming Author — Responsible Person — Pleading.

In an action for slander, if it appears, from the plaintiff’s testimony, that at the time of speaking the words the defendant named his author, who was a responsible man, the defendant may avail himself of that testimony without pleading the matter as a special justification.

[Cited in Jarnigan v. Fleming, 43 Miss. 710.]

Slander. The words laid in the declaration were, “You stuck a pitchfork into a man in Ireland, and murdered him, and fled.” The plaintiff’s witness proved that the defendant said that he had heard one Tweedy say that Burke told him that the plaintiff had killed a man in-Ireland, with a pitchfork, and had fled for it.

Mr. Mason, for defendant,

in cross-examining the plaintiff’s witness, asked him whether Burke was a responsible man; whether he lived in the city at that time, &c.

Mr. Peacock, for plaintiff,

objected to the questions, contending that if the defendant meant to rely upon the fact of the defendant’s having named his author at the time, he ought to have pleaded it, and cannot give testimony of that kind on the general issue.

Mr. Mason, in reply,

was stopped by THE COURT, who said the objection was premature. The defendant’s counsel were only cross-examining the plaintiff’s witness. The plaintiff must make out his case; and although he is not bound to prove the words exactly as laid, yet he must prove words which-were-actionable-and in-substance as laid. But if the plaintiff’s witness proves that the words spoken were substantially different from those laid, and the words proved are not actionable as spoken, there is no necessity for the defendant to plead those facts which come from the- plaintiff’s -own witness.

Mr. Peacock then prayed the court to instruct the jury that the words proved were in substance the same as those charged in the declaration. But THE COURT refused, being of opinion that they were substantially different

CRANCH, Circuit Judge.

When the defendant means to prove other words spoken at the same time with those laid in the declaration and which make -the words laid not actionable, then, in order to enable the defendant. to bring -testimony of those other words he must plead his justification specially. But if the plaintiff’s evidence proves words which justify the defendant, or which show that the words charged are not actionable as spoken, there the defendant may take advantage of them without pleading special; ly. For the plaintiff must make a good cause of action, and if it appears from his own evidence that the words charged are not actionable as spoken, he fails to support his cause of action.

But KILTY, Chief Judge, and MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, were of a different opinion.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 142

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Congress should have the

power to prohibit the desecration of the flag of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Congress

should have the power to prohibit the desecration of

the flag of the United States.

Whereas from Valley Forge to Yugoslavia, in every battlefield

where ever American values have been attacked and

American lives sacrificed, the flag of the United States

has been the shining, indomitable, eternal spirit of American liberty in visual form;

Whereas to desecrate such a symbol is to desecrate the memory of the thousands of Americans who have sacrificed

their lives to keep that banner flying, intact, and inviolate; and

Whereas since Americans have fought and died to defend the

flag of the United States, any act of desecration of the
2

•HCON 142 IH

flag is profoundly offensive to Americans: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the reasoning of the opinion of the United

4 States Supreme Court leading to the decision in

5 Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was flawed;

6 (2) as a symbol of our Nation, the flag of the

7 United States is unique and deserves to be treated

8 with respect of the highest order; and

9 (3) the Congress should have the power to pro10 hibit the desecration of the flag of the United

11 States.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 06-328M

)

v. ) DETENTION ORDER

)

FLORENCIO TAMAYO- )

MENDEZ, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

Offense charged:

Count 1: Illegal Reentry After Deportation

Date of Detention Hearing: June 22, 2006

The Court, having conducted an uncontested detention hearing pursuant to Title

18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for

detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which the

defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and

the safety of any other person and the community. The Government was represented by Don

Reno. 

The defendant was represented by Carol Koller.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

 (1) The defendant represents a risk of nonappearance due to the following:

he is a citizen and national of Mexico who has previously been deported;

he has no ties to this district; his ties to the Western District of

Case 2:06-cr-00216-TSZ Document 8 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Washington are unknown/unverified; and the Bureau of Immigration

Customs and Enforcement (“BICE”) has filed a detainer.

(2) The defendant represents a risk of danger due to his criminal history.

(3) The defendant does not contest detention.

Thus, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure

future court appearances.

It is therefore ORDERED:

(l) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody

of the Attorney General for confinement in a correctional facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving

sentences, or being held in custody pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the Government, the person in charge of the correctional facility in

which Defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a

court proceeding; and,

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United

States, to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to

the United States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 26th day of June, 2006.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00216-TSZ Document 8 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:06-cr-00216-TSZ Document 8 Filed 06/26/06 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 99.1**

 
| **Onyx Acceptance Owner Trust 2005-B** | ** ** | ** ** | ** **     |
|------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|----------------|
| Aggregate Data for year ended December 31,  2005           |       |       |           |
|                                                       |       |       |           |
| Defaulted Contracts                                        |       | $          | 6,888,875.02   |   |
| Total Collections                                          |       | $          | 226,458,199.88 |   |
| Regular Principal Distributable Amounts                    |       | $          | 188,949,723.42 |   |
| Interest Collected on Contracts                            |       | $          | 41,752,912.80  |   |
| Annual Servicing Fee                                       |       | $          | 3,987,229.13   |   |

 

----
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT


TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SafeStitch
Medical, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SafeStitch
      Medical, Inc.




By:
                          /s/ Adam S.
      JacksonAdam
      S. JacksonChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      7,
2009





The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of SafeStitch Medical, Inc.
or the certifying officers.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 268

Supporting a National Day of Honor for African American World War II

veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 2000

Ms. BROWN of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting a National Day of Honor for African American

World War II veterans.

Whereas World War II was a determining event of the 20th

century in securing democracy over fascism in many

parts of the world;

Whereas the United States called upon all its citizens to provide service and sacrifice to achieve the Allied victory

over fascism;

Whereas over 1,200,000 African Americans were among the

16,535,000 Americans who served in the Armed Forces

in World War II, including those who gave the ultimate

sacrifice, their lives;
2

•HCON 268 IH

Whereas many of the deeds of those African Americans were

not fully reported and honored until decades after the Allied victory; and

Whereas various organizations will recognize May 25, 2000,

as a National Day of Honor for African American World

War II veterans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Congress supports the goals and

2 ideas of a National Day of Honor for African American

3 World War II veterans.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 35 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.35
                                          Agreed to July 1, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

 

Whereas His Highness, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, the Emir of 
  Qatar, issued a decree creating a central municipal council, the 
  first of its kind in Qatar;

Whereas on March 8, 1999, the people of the State of Qatar held direct 
  elections for a central municipal council;

Whereas the central municipal council has been structured to have 
  members from 29 election districts serving 4-year terms;

Whereas Qatari women were granted the right to participate in this 
  historic first municipal election, both as candidates and voters;

Whereas this election demonstrates the strength and diversity of the 
  State of Qatar's commitment to democratic expression;

Whereas the United States highly values democracy and women's rights;

Whereas March 8 is recognized as International Women's Day, and is an 
  occasion to assess the progress of the advancement of women and girls 
  throughout the world; and

Whereas this historic event of democratic elections and women's 
  suffrage in the State of Qatar should be honored: Now, therefore, be 
  it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
        (1) commends His Highness, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, 
    the Emir of Qatar, for his leadership and commitment to suffrage 
    and the principles of democracy;
        (2) congratulates the citizens of the State of Qatar as they 
    celebrate the historic election for a central municipal council; 
    and
        (3) reaffirms that the United States is strongly committed to 
    encouraging the suffrage of women, democratic ideals, and peaceful 
    development throughout the Middle East.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 12, 2024

In the

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-01234-CV

GRACIELA VILLARREAL, Appellant

V.

ALBERTO VILLARREAL-URBINA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-53418-2023

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

231234f.p05

/Cory L. Carlyle//

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

GRACIELA VILLARREAL, 

Appellant

No. 05-23-01234-CV V.

ALBERTO VILLARREALURBINA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-53418-

2023.

Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. 

Justices Reichek and Miskel 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 12th day of February, 2024.
# C_2005019EN.01002401.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/24

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 September 2004

in Case T-14/04 Alto da Casablanca SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Representation by a lawyer - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2005/C 19/52)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-14/04, Alto da Casablanca SA, established in Casablanca (Chile), represented by A. Pluckrose, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: O. Montalto), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Bodegas Julián Chivite, SL, established in Cintruénigo (Spain) – application for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2003 (Case R 18/2003-2) concerning an application for registration of the word mark VERAMONTE as a Community trade mark – the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) composed of P. Lindh, President, R. Garcia-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 September 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| (1) | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| (2) | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71 of 20.3.2004.

1

---
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LARRY ALBERT,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-514M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count 1: Possession of Five or More Fraudulent Identification Documents in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(3).

Count 2: Social Security Number Fraud in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B).

Count 3: Possession of a Fraudulent Identification Document in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1028(a)(6).

Date of Detention Hearing: October 31, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

Defendant has stipulated to detention and has reserved the right to contest his continued

detention upon his appearance in court in the District of New Mexico if this case is transferred,

or before this Court if this case is not transferred and there are new facts or circumstances that

should be considered.

Case 2:05-cr-00445-JCC Document 8 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 1st day of November, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00445-JCC Document 8 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 2