alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 236 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 236

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 1999

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                Correcting the Enrollment of H.R. 1180.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1180), to amend the Social 
Security Act to expand the availability of health care coverage for 
working individuals with disabilities, to establish a Ticket to Work 
and Self-
Sufficiency Program in the Social Security Administration to provide 
such individuals with meaningful opportunities to work, and for other 
purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representative shall make the 
following correction: Strike section 408 and insert the following:

``SEC. 408. CLIMATE DATABASE MODERNIZATION.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration shall initiate a new competitive 
contract procurement for its multi-year program for key entry of 
valuable climate records, archive services, and database development in 
accordance with existing Federal procurement laws and regulations.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Resource Capital Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan Z. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




March 21, 2014/s/ Jonathan Z. CohenJonathan Z. CohenChief Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

December 21, 1966

No. P66/381.

#### National Silver Co. *v.*United States, protest 62/9457 (Los Angeles).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of battery-operated mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe annual report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel C. Sibley, ChiefFinancial Officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managing generalpartner of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| Date: April 16, 2007 | /s/ Daniel C. Sibley              |   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Daniel C. Sibley                  |   |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer           |   |
|                 | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. |   |

 

This certificationis not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification is not deemed to beincorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134619 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS and 

MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL RISK 

MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, as 

subrogee of City of Madison Heights, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134619 

 COA: 266333 

Oakland CC: 2004-055598-CZ 

ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY, 

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION, 

and BELL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

s1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2007 

 Clerk
#### CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-5091.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 9, 2001.

*949Before-RADER, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION

1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cadence) for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Cadence, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadence.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of March 16, 2009.



/S/    THEODORE R.
SCHROEDERTheodore R. SchroederPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)




/S/    WILLIAM R.
LARUEWilliam R. LaRueSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cadence, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence and will be retained by Cadence and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Todd A.Fitzpatrick, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Harbor Acquisition Corporation.

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 27,2007 
|        |     | /s/ TODD A. FITZPATRICK                         |
|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |     | Todd A. Fitzpatrick                             |
|   | * * | *Vice  President*                               |
|   | * * | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 PROPOSED ORDER - [3:06-cv-5389-RBL-KLS]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JOSEPH M. PELTON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. 3:06-cv-5389-RBL-KLS

ORDER FOR REMAND

Based on the stipulation between the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the

above-captioned case be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings pursuant

to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties, acting through their respective counsel,

hereby agree that the above-captioned case be reversed and remanded for a de novo hearing

pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand to an Administrative Law Judge

(ALJ), the ALJ will reevaluate the medical evidence and will be directed to obtain testimony from

Dr. Clayton, if possible. If Dr. Clayton is not available, the ALJ will obtain additional testimony

Case 3:06-cv-05389-RBL Document 32 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 PROPOSED ORDER - [3:06-cv-5389-RBL-KLS]

from a medical expert. The parties agree that reasonable attorney fees should be awarded, upon

proper application, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

DATED this 21st day of June, 2007.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for Entry:

s/Karen L. Strombom 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ L. JAMALA EDWARDS 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900

Seattle, WA 98104

Phone: (206) 615-3749

Fax: (206)615-2531

jamala.edwards@ssa.gov

Case 3:06-cv-05389-RBL Document 32 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

NORA KENNEY, *

* No. 11-363V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Filed: February 22, 2016

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Attorneys’ fees and costs

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Ronald C. Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for 

petitioner;

Debra A. Filteau Begley, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

Nora Kenney was denied compensation through the National Childhood 

Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §300aa—10 through 34 (2012). Decision, issued 

Jan. 16, 2015. Previously, she was awarded attorneys’ fees and costs on an interim 

basis based upon a stipulation. Decision, issued Nov. 18, 2014. She now seeks an 

award of final attorneys’ fees and costs. She is awarded $4,487.65. 

* * *

The present case is similar to other recently decided cases involving the law 

firm representing this petitioner. In short, the parties did not agree to a reasonable 

 

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. 
2

hourly rate for the attorneys representing petitioners in the Vaccine Program and 

the dispute led to litigation. For a more complete recitation of events, see

McCulloch v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-293V, 2015 WL 5634323 

(Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 1, 2015) and Avchen v. Sec’y of Health & Human 

Servs., No. 14-279V, 2015 WL 9595415 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Dec. 4, 2015). 

Ms. Kenney presently requests an award of $4,901.00 in attorneys’ fees and

$22.65 in attorneys’ costs. The Secretary’s remaining objection concerns the 

amount of time the attorneys spent. 

The Secretary’s objection that work performed by multiple attorneys 

duplicated the work the primary attorney performed is well founded. This results 

in a deduction of $436.00. 

Ms. Kenney is awarded $4,487.65 in attorneys’ fees and costs. This shall be 

paid as follows: 

$4,487.65 representing attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be 

in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and 

petitioner’s attorney, Ronald Homer, of Conway, Homer & ChinCaplan, in the amount of $4,487.65.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the 

clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Shannon Proctor, at 

(202) 357-6360. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-589

In Re: PHILLIP M. PROPST,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-151-MU)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip M. Propst, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip M. Propst has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

from this court seeking to have this court order the North Carolina

Superior Court Department of Justice to release discovery materials

related to his criminal trial on state charges. Mandamus is a

drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See

Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which

the relief sought could be granted, see In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818,

826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba Indian Tribe, 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir.

1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden

of showing that he has “no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his entitlement to such relief is “clear

and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S.

33, 35 (1980). Propst has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant Propst leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny

his petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
No. 60617.

#### Senter Brass Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 188714-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

HonorableCh8s. A. Touch Reoords Bulldiag Dallas, 2, Teua Dear Sir:

tiona whlc@, lrnture the cuqrentyear?

rqad district highway ftind untl.1 the requiremeatsof the Sate Board with respect to refunding absll be oomplledwith. “But it ia aleo provided by Subsection (g) of sridArticle: “‘In this ooanection it ia declrred to be the intent of the Leglsleture~that all contractualHonorableChfbs. A. Tosch, psge 2

duties arid

obll ad7 tloas which lpsy exlst between

_ Any countya **or** defined road dlstriatand the owner or holder of the prese t ml7 outstandingindebtednessof any countya or deiln ed road district, shsll not be in any smsner disturbed or impsiredand &ill remsin lnvlolate.~ "ti! do not question,the powerand ruthorltp of thi State Bomd to require ths refund eligible 'obli#tious rturlng, **we do,qqeatioro**  the authority of the Btite Board to de- tbit the county attempt **to** redeem by refuadlggbonds PIILturing In future. years. "As you know, the redemption statute (Article 720) provides thSt such bonds,msybs redeqst- **&ble )rt**  **the** pleasure of the county' 8nd that such r,edemjMon %sy be fixed by the Cosm~W~ionersl **Coq+.t*** Ye thl& it is o,&& d8t the Beard OS 6ouMy and plstriatRord,Indebtedness &s the ruthotiitip

to require councompliedtiith.

$h **lgwth** Court ia ‘both the Goabrra. Co&y case and the B&r COpaty *se laba eorstru~d&tia3n 7?9in such a msnaer &a to &b cl&r th*t beads Wy be op!lorUl under the &s regkrdleskof the iact that the CWUUi.SSi~ik~l’ S ’ COUrt IgaoFed the slbtute iud attempted to i88uO then to *ture seri*llylrad

without optioq of prier redemption. Zhe Attorney &ge&l's D@srtmtmt has held otherwise for the lastHonorable Oh%. A. Bosch, page 3

taenty-five

yetbra, but alme the 8. eple

'Y Court has spoken in such-usmlstakrble

UngrBrge,we ah&L *ccept its Opinionand follow it.

Pou are thereforeadvised that in our opinion the State Bdrd of Oountyand ~lst+iataoad I&debtedsess0m3 the authority to requlTe,+oo~t~es~ to re?m$ Uy bondswhlchrre optionU eitheray re%gon of.,h0+?greserved suoh .option In thtrprOceeding8

rutboriciagt,hqlr

iss1P~ce,or by reMion of the pr0~i81~8 of Article 720, &a sonh Article has been coimtrued by the Supreme Cotirt. Yours very truly ATTORXtY

(kRRRjUOF TEXAS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of October.

# DATES:

Friday, October 20, 2023, 10 a.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Meeting to take place virtually and is open to the public via livestream on the Commission's YouTube page:                         *https://www.youtube.com/​user/​USCCR/​videos.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Angelia Rorison: 202-376-8371;                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on October 20, 2023, is                     *https://www.streamtext.net/​player?​event=​USCCR.*                     Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.                

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Business Meeting

III. Discussion and Vote on 2024 USCCR Business Meeting Calendar

IV. Presentation by the Texas Advisory Committee Chair on interim report, Mental Healthcare in the Texas Juvenile Justice System

V. Management and Operations
    - Staff Director's Report

VI. Adjourn Meeting

Dated: October 16, 2023.

Angelia Rorison,

USCCR Media and Communications Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-23092 Filed 10-16-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P