alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 239 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 239

 To authorize testimony and document production and representation of 
   Senate employees in Pointe Properties, Inc., et al. v. Michael J. 
                            Bevenour, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 1, 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and document production and representation of 
   Senate employees in Pointe Properties, Inc., et al. v. Michael J. 
                            Bevenour, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Pointe Properties, Inc., et al. v. Michael J. Bevenour, 
        et al., No. 96-CA-009720, pending in the Superior Court for the District 
        of Columbia, testimony has been requested from Mike Morrill, an employee 
        on the staff of Senator Barbara A. Mikulski;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        any subpoena, order, or request for testimony or the production of 
        documents relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Mike Morrill, and any other employee from whom 
testimony or document production may be required, are authorized to 
testify and produce documents in the case of Pointe Properties, Inc., 
et al. v. Michael J. Bevenour, et al., except concerning matters for 
which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mike 
Morrill, and any other employee from whom testimony or document 
production may be required, in connection with Pointe Properties, Inc., 
et al. v. Michael J. Bevenour, et al.
                                 <all>
```
H. Con. Res. 234 Agreed to December 21, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the enrolled copy of the bill (H.R. 2466) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes, shall not be presented to the President, to the end that

the bill be, and is hereby, laid on the table.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

** **

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**______________________**

** **

**FORM 10-Q**

** **

[ X ] Quarterly Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934

 

For the quarter ended **August 31, 2013**

 

[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from ________to ___________

 

Commission file number: 000-52473

 

**LEGAL LIFE PLANS, INC.**

(Name of Small Business Issuer in ItsCharter)

 

 

Legal Life Plans, Inc.

(Former name or former address and formerfiscal year, if changed since last report.)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filingrequirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registranthas submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submittedand posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for suchshorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantis a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “largeaccelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.(Check one):

 

Large Accelerated Filer [ ]	 Accelerated Filer [ ] 	Non-AcceleratedFiler [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]

** **

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [X] No [ ]

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’sCommon Stock, $0.001 par value per share, as of October 22 2013, was 171,419.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,115,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                   273,000
<INVENTORY>                                    424,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,012,478
<PP&E>                                       1,458,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                 928,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,012,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,500,301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    970,000
<COMMON>                                     8,510,770
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,924,523)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,012,949
<SALES>                                      3,332,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,370,443
<CGS>                                        2,789,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,958,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (322,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (322,542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01077101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/771 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/771

---

(2004/C 78 E/0821)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2962/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(8 October 2003)

Subject:   Damage to valuable works contained in the temple of St Sofia

Subject:

According to the Turkish ‘Miliyet’ newspaper, around 550 invaluable religious paintings and relics (vestments, holy manuscripts, etc.) currently being stored in the temple of St Sofia in Istanbul, are in extremely poor condition since not even the basic minimum has been done by way of conservation. The temple became a repository for those works, which were brought in from disused churches in various regions of Turkey, when it was converted into a museum in 1935.

Is it possible to earmark funding for the conservation and restoration of these works in cooperation with the responsible authorities and from which programme?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(3 November 2003)

(3 November 2003)

The Community's financial assistance programme for Turkey does not allow to provide support for conserving and restoring religious or cultural works, such as those stored in the Hagia Sofia. The programme is designed primarily to support Turkey's alignment with Union standards in the political, economic and legislative areas. Project proposals are prepared by the Turkish Government and are subject to approval by the Commission, which is given only for projects that contribute to meeting the priorities of the Accession Partnership, as adopted by the Council of Ministers on 15 May 2003.

---
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

TYEREL DARNEL LUKE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 20-0056 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 1995-008176

The Honorable Stephen M. Hopkins, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker

Counsel for Respondent

Tyerel Darnel Luke, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 9-24-2020
STATE v. LUKE

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, and 

Chief Judge Peter B. Swann1 delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Tyerel Darnel Luke seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s fifth

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.

1 Chief Judge Peter B. Swann replaces the Honorable Kenton D. Jones, who 

was originally assigned to this panel.
No. 60635.

#### J. R. Importing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 280393-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dime savings banks the same in all material respects as those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-085
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.10


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3

                         TO PHARMCHEM LABORATORIES, INC.

                            1992 DIRECTOR OPTION PLAN



        This Amendment No. 3 (the "Amendment") to the PharmChem Laboratories,
Inc. 1992 Director Option Plan, as heretofore amended (the "Plan"), is made
effective as of the 30th day of November, 1999 by the Administrator of the Plan
pursuant to Section 11(a) of the Plan. All capitalized terms used herein and not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Plan.

                                    AMENDMENT

        The Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.      The date "January 1" in Section 4(b)(iii) of the Plan is hereby changed
to "March 31."

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed effective as of the date
first set forth above by the Administrator of the Plan, which Administrator
consists of the Outside Directors of the Company.



                                                 /s/  Richard D. Irwin
                                          ------------------------------------
                                                 Richard D. Irwin


                                                 /s/ Donald R. Stroben
                                          ------------------------------------
                                                 Donald R. Stroben
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission gives notice that it has formally requested that the parties to the below listed agreements provide additional information pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 40304(d). This action prevents the agreements from becoming effective as originally scheduled. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreements to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. Comments may be filed up to fifteen (15) days after publication of this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*Agreement No.:*                     201234-006.                

*Title:*                     Agreement by Ocean Common Carriers to Participate on the Exchange Board.                

*Parties:*                     CMA CGM SA; Hapag-Lloyd AG; COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd; COSCO Shipping Co., Ltd.; HMM Company Limited; Maersk A/S; and Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. (ONE).                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: October 10, 2023.

Carl Savoy,

Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-22740 Filed 10-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-1600

CARMEN J. ROMAN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER, United States Postmaster General,

 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on May 5, 2010, is amended

as follows:

On the cover page, substitute "Delgado-Colón" for "DelgadoColon".
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2012016EN.01000901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/9 |

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))

2012/C 16/05

PART I

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid No | GBER 14/11/ENV | | |
| EFTA State | Norway | | |
| Granting authority | Name | Directorate of Customs and Excise (regional customs authorities) | |
| Address | | | | --- | | Postboks 8122 Dep | | 0032 Oslo | | NORWAY | | |
| Webpage | http://www.toll.no | |
| Title of the aid measure | Reduced electricity tax rate in the regions of Finnmark and North Troms (Karlsøy, Kvænangen, Kåfjord, Lyngen, Nordreisa, Skjervøy and Storfjord) | | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | The Norwegian Parliament's annual decision on the electricity tax | | |
| Web link to the full text of the aid measure | http://www.statsbudsjettet.no/upload/Statsbudsjett\_2012/dokumenter/pdf/skatt.pdf (see page 243) | | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | Tax reduction | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | Prolongation | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 447/07/COL | |
| Duration | Scheme | 1.1.2012 to 31.12.2021 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid | Undertakings located in North Troms and Finnmark | |
| Limited to specific sectors — Please specify in accordance with NACE Rev. 2 | | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | Both SME and large enterprises | |
| Large enterprises | Both SME and large enterprises | |
| Budget | Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | NOK 80 million | |
| Aid instrument (Article 5) | Fiscal measure | | X |

PART II

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| General objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK | SME — bonuses in % |
| Aid for environmental protection (Articles 17-25) | Aid in the form of reductions in environmental taxes (Article 25) | NOK 80 million | |

---
~ J Libert ~ • tgaliti - Fraternite REPUBLIQUE FRANGAISE 

### MINISTERE DE L'ECOLOGIE, DU DEVELOPPEMENT DURABI_,E ET DE L'ENERGIE Direc•tion yen
~ 

### rule cle 1'Avicrtion civile 

## Paris, le 2 6 SEP, 2014

Direction clu Trunsport ac ~ 

### rien Sous-directron des Transporteur:s et Services aftic>ns

R&erence JDTA/SDT Mr Paul GRETCH Director of Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street S.W. WASHINGTON DC 20590 USA Affaire suivie par : Franqois Th6oleyre francois.theoleyre@aviation-civile.gouv.fr Tel. 0158 09 36 45 - Fax : 0158 09 38 43

Subject : Reciprocity certificate Dear Mr Gretch, 

### In the framework of the Charter Rules for U.S. and Foreign Direct Air Carriers and in accordance with the rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed in Washington on 30 April 2007 

### between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America and the rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed on 18 June 1998 between the Government 

### of the French Republic and the Government of the United States as amended, the French civil aviation authorities herewith confirm that they will grant, on the basis of reciprocity, fifth-freedom rights to U.S. air carriers to provide non scheduled flights tolfrom the French territory. 

### Non scheduled traffic rights outside of this scope shall continue to be considered on a case by case basis and out of reciprocity. This letter will remain valid until it is recalled. Yours sincerely,
Frandois %HEOLEYRE Deputy Dir ;"rbr Aylines and Air Services

50, rue Henry Farman 75720 Paris cedex 15 ~ ~ • www. developpement-durabfe. gouv. Ir T61 :+33 (0) 15 09 43 21
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LEONARD GRUNSTEIN, §

§ 

Plaintiff Below, § No. 569, 2014

Appellant, §

§

v. §

§ Court Below: Court of

RONALD E. SILVA, PEARL SENIOR § Chancery of the State of

CARE, LLC, PSC SUB, LLC, GEARY § Delaware

PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, §

FILLMORE CAPITAL PARTNERS, § C.A. No. 3932-VCN

LLC, FILLMORE STRATEGIC §

INVESTORS, LLC, DRUMM §

INVESTORS, LLC, and FILLMORE §

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, LLC, §

§

Defendants Below, §

Appellees. §

Submitted: April 22, 2015

Decided: April 23, 2015

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and 

SEITZ, Justices, constituting the Court en banc.

O R D E R

This 23rd day of April 2015, after careful consideration of the parties’

briefs and oral argument on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment of the 

Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned 

by the Court of Chancery in its opinion dated September 5, 2014.

1

 

 

1 Grunstein v. Silva, 2014 WL 4473641 (Del. Ch. Sept. 5, 2014).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is hereby AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice