alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     the financial statements contained in the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
     quarter ended January 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1 
<CURRENCY>                      U. S. Dollars             
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1998         
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-1997   
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-1998   
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1   
<CASH>                             2,005,308  
<SECURITIES>                         511,250            
<RECEIVABLES>                        157,619  
<ALLOWANCES>                               0  
<INVENTORY>                          282,658  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   3,062,429  
<PP&E>                               523,680  
<DEPRECIATION>                       376,331  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4,357,195  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                231,204  
<BONDS>                                    0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0  
<PREFERRED>                                0  
<COMMON>                          13,237,386  
<OTHER-SE>                                 0  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       4,357,195  
<SALES>                              458,809  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     458,809  
<CGS>                                      0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        435,348  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,990,027  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,794,208)  
<INCOME-TAX>                               0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0  
<DISCONTINUED>                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0  
<CHANGES>                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,794,208)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.37) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.37) 
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6436

BERNARD BAGLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ROBERT WARD, Warden

of the Evans Correctional Institution; WILLIAM

GUNN, Director of South Carolina Department of

Probation, Parole and Pardon Services,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-96-487-2-8AJ)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Bagley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order directing

service upon the Respondents. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither

a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   1.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;
 3.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




---



##### 



(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: June 20, 2011
    By:

/s/
Kit Leong LowName:
    Kit Leong LowTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    164,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           522
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   219,380
<SALES>                                         82,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,297
<CGS>                                           68,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                       905
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2 

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551 

DIVISION OF SUPERVISION 

AND REGULATION

SR 19-6 

March 11, 2019 

TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION

 AT EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

SUBJECT: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Policy Statement on the 

Principles for Completing the Report of Examination 

Applicability: This guidance applies to the completion of reports of examination for state 

member banks. 

This letter announces that the Federal Reserve and the other Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council (FFIEC) members1 have developed a set of principles that supervisors 

should follow in the development of reports of examination (ROE). The FFIEC members 

concluded that a principles-based approach for completing the ROE would better achieve the 

objectives of promoting consistency and communication among the members, while allowing 

individual supervisors the flexibility to document their assessment of financial institutions of 

different sizes, activities, risk profiles, and financial and managerial conditions. The attached 

FFIEC policy statement replaces the 1993 Interagency Policy Statement on the Uniform Core 

Report of Examination.2

The principles in the attached policy statement are high-level and apply to the preparation 

of ROEs of state member banks. The Federal Reserve has developed more specific guidance 

regarding the preparation of ROEs, which is outlined in the Commercial Bank Examination 

Manual. Federal Reserve staff should consider these principles in communicating the results of 

other supervisory activities to institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve. 

Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter to state member banks in their districts 

and to appropriate supervisory staff. Questions regarding this letter should be directed to: 

Jonathan Rono, Manager, at (202) 721-4568; and Laura Macedo, at (202) 452-5268, in the 

 

1

 The FFIEC members include the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 

the National Credit Union Administration, and the State Liaison Committee. 

2 With the issuance of this guidance, SR letter 93-59, “Interagency Uniform Core Report of Examination,” is 

superseded.
 

Page 2 of 2 

Community Bank Supervision Section; and Alex Kobulsky, at (202) 452-2031, in the Policy 

Implementation Section. 

In addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s public website.3

Michael S. Gibson

Director

Attachment:

• Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Policy Statement on the Report 

of Examination

Supersedes:

• SR letter 93-59, “Interagency Uniform Core Report of Examination 

 

3 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 22, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0984

Lower Tribunal No. 20-4870

________________

Zaida Housley,

Appellant,

vs.

In Re: Estate of James T. Giffen, Sr.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer 

Eig, Judge.

Stok Kon + Braverman, and Robert A. Stok, Joshua R. Kon, and 

Natasha Shaikh (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Clayton R. Kaeiser, P.A., and Clayton R. Kaeiser, for appellee David 

Giffen.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

PATRICK DRUM,,

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

 HAROLD CLARKE, CASE NUMBER: C06-5360RBL-KLS

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Defendants motion to Dismiss (DKT. #62) is GRANTED.

 May 2, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05360-RBL Document 118 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 1
1999

- Turkey Hatchery, 07.15.99  [ Text |   PDF ]  Turkey Hatchery, 06.16.99 [ Text | PDF ]Turkey Hatchery, 05.14.99 
[ Text |
 PDF ]
- Turkey Hatchery, 04.15.99  [ Text |   PDF ]  Turkey Hatchery, 03.12.99 [ Text | PDF ]Turkey Hatchery, 02.12.99 
[ Text |
 PDF ]
- Turkey Hatchery, 01.14.99   [ Text |   PDF ]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 19, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 2, 2023,                           ( print page 72115)                        it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 69 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-1, CP2024-1.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-23019 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 255

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding Federal spending on veterans

programs and allocation of funds received by the Federal Government

for claims arising from smoking-related illnesses or an increased risk

of smoking-related illnesses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 2000

Mr. TRAFICANT (for himself and Mr. BILIRAKIS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding Federal

spending on veterans programs and allocation of funds

received by the Federal Government for claims arising

from smoking-related illnesses or an increased risk of

smoking-related illnesses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) Federal spending on veterans programs for

4 each of the next ten fiscal years should be increased

5 by at least the rate of inflation;

6 (2) at least 20 percent of any funds received by

7 the Federal Government for claims arising from
2

•HCON 255 IH

1 smoking-related illnesses or an increased risk of

2 smoking-related illnesses should be used for veterans

3 health programs; and

4 (3) all funds received by the Federal Govern5 ment for claims brought on behalf of veterans and

6 arising from smoking-related illnesses or an in7 creased risk of smoking-related illnesses should be

8 used for veterans health programs.

Æ
No. 57510.

#### British American Importation Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 118502-K.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
No. 67224.

protest 61/24626 (New York).

#### Paul E. Sernau, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 CCPA 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the cases, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the cases of merchandise, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 282 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 282

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Declaring the ``Person of the Century'' for the 20th century to have 
                         been the American G.I.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 282

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the 20th century was a century of conflict between forces of 
        totalitarianism and dictatorship and forces of democracy and freedom;
Whereas American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines (collectively referred 
        to as ``G.I.'s'') fought, bled, and died in a number of conflicts during 
        the 20th century, including two World Wars, to secure peace and freedom 
        around the world;
Whereas in large measure due to the heroic efforts of the American G.I., more 
        people around the world enjoy the benefits of freedom at the end of the 
        20th century than at any other time in history;
Whereas the American G.I., in fighting the forces of totalitarianism and 
        dictatorship, had a strong personal sense of right and wrong and did not 
        want to live in a world where wrong prevailed;
Whereas it may truly be said that during the 20th century the American G.I. 
        accomplished great things while doing good things, becoming recognized 
        throughout the world as a representative of freedom and democracy and, 
        fundamentally, as a force for good in the face of evil;
Whereas at the end of the 20th century numerous organizations and publications 
        sought to identify and designate a ``Person of the Century'' based upon 
        achievements and contributions during that century; and
Whereas in light of the accomplishments of the Armed Forces of the United States 
        during that century both in defeating the forces of tyranny and 
        dictatorship and in embodying a sense of honor, decency, and respect for 
        mankind, it is appropriate that the American G.I. be recognized as the 
        single most significant force affecting the course of the 20th century: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress hereby declares the ``Person of the Century'' for the 
20th century to have been the American G.I.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Official Journal C 317/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 317 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6522 August 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 317

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6522 August 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 317/01 | Euro exchange rates — 19 August 2022 | 1 |
| 2022/C 317/02 | Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems – AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 317/01

Euro exchange rates — 19 August 2022

1

2022/C 317/02

Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems – AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN