alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 9, 2012 

h0502 

Order 

 

May 9, 2012 

144165 

RANDY H. BERNSTEIN, D.P.M., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 144165 

 COA: 299184 

 Oakland CC: 2008-096538-NM 

SEYBURN, KAHN, GINN, BESS & SERLIN, 

P.C. and BARRY R. BESS, 

Defendant-Appellees, 

____________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          65,990
<SECURITIES>                                    41,463
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,662
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                      3,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,081
<PP&E>                                          26,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,019
<BONDS>                                         80,880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,400
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,752
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,007
<SALES>                                          4,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,824
<CGS>                                            2,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 52781.

#### Perrin Glove Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 581589-G, etc. (New York).

*218Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
No. 59335.

protests 176764-K, etc. (New York).

#### Roure Dupont Mfg., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cedarwood oil, a distilled or essential oil, not provided for by name in the tariff act, and is not a mixture or combination containing essential or distilled oils, or natural or synthetic odoriferous or aromatic substances, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**STATEMENT      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (a)    | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                         |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
|   | (b)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LandAmerica                Financial Group, Inc. |   |

| By:    | /s/                Theodore L. Chandler, Jr.        |   |   | Date:  | October                31, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Theodore                L. Chandler, Jr.            |   |   |   |                            |
|   | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   |
Before the Second Division,

June 28, 1949

No. 53345.

protest 147074-K (New York).

#### Irving Malino *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the Third Division,

September 28, 1956

No. 60265.

protests 127551-K and 127552-K (Philadelphia).

#### Kasser Distillers Products Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Counsel for the respective parties stipulated that the protests be dismissed, inasmuch as the entries involved had been reliquidated, as a result of which the issues became moot. Accepting this stipulation as an agreed statement of facts, the protests were dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 OF WESTIN HOTELS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          28,321
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                       312
<INVENTORY>                                        624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,783
<PP&E>                                         354,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,916
<BONDS>                                        165,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,056
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.81<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.81<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 192/16 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 192 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6016 June 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 192

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6016 June 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2017/C 192/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management for the financial year 2016 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice

2017/C 192/01

Report on budgetary and financial management for the financial year 2016

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2012-0108 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-049-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to submit a separate 

record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “Ex Parte Contacts.”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

ATA Joe White 03/07/2011 Concur.

Boeing AR Norm Black 03/07/2011 Concur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit: 10.14T

SECURITY INTEREST AGREEMENT (#17)                                 March 29, 1995

WHEREAS the Trudy Corp (d/b/a Soundprints) of 165 Water Street in Norwalk, Ct.
(hereafter "Trudy") is seeking to pay various capital expenses including the
Energy Solutions payment of $6,800 to relamp and reballast a large portion of
the building, and

WHEREAS the Trudy Corp has to date been unable to secure financing for low cost,
three year funding, and

WHEREAS William W. Burnham (hereafter "Burnham") of White Oak Shade Road in New
Canaan, Ct. is willing to assist Trudy Corp by lending Trudy Corp $4,800.00
(four thousand eight hundred dollars and 00/100) for capital expenditures net of
the $2,000 rebate by South Norwalk Electric on March 29, 1995,

NOW THEREFORE, Trudy Corp agrees to provide a security interest to Burnham in
recognition of the value he is providing the Company and the risks inherent
therein. Given that this cash is necessary for the Company to survive, that cash
has great value to Trudy.

Trudy agrees to give Burnham a collateral interest in all Cash or Securities,
all Accounts Receivable both of Trudy and its subsidiary, Soundprints, all
inventory of whatever kind, and all furniture and fixtures. This security
interest shall be limited to the amount referred to above, plus imputed interest
of 10% per annum. Trudy shall repay Burnham with monthly payments of $154.88 for
a period of thirty six months (totaling $5,575.77 over three years, including
interest of $775.77).

Burnham shall be entitled to perfect his security interest, if and when, Trudy
is unable to repay this debt on its maturity; the entire $4,800 should be repaid
by May 1, 1998. In such circumstances, Burnham shall have a collateral interest
second only to that of Union Trust (if any) and Alice Burnham, but in any event
senior to all trade creditors and to all other liabilities of the Company unless
otherwise stated or stipulated by legislation.

Both parties agree that there may be partial reductions under this agreement as
funds are repaid by Trudy to Burnham; the collateral interest shall be reduced
pro rata.

AGREED:  /s/ Peter P. Ogilvie                  ACCEPTED:  /s/ William W. Burnham
         ----------------------                           ----------------------
         Peter P. Ogilvie, VP.                           William W. Burnham
         for Trudy Corp

Dated:   March 30, 1995.
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

                   GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-8 (the "Trust")
                            Asset-Backed Certificates
                                  Series 2005-8

I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report"), and
      all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution date reports (collectively
      with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of periods
      included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a whole,
      does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
      a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
      the last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
      to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the applicable
      Servicing Agreement for inclusion in the Reports is included in the
      Reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
      this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in
      accordance with the terms of the applicable Servicing Agreement, and
      except as disclosed in the Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the applicable Servicing Agreement; and

5.    The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
      Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
      report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
      Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the applicable
      Servicing Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee and the
Servicer.


Date:    March 30, 2006


/s/ Michelle Gill
-------------------------------
Michelle Gill
Vice President
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 PETITION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SUN HEAN LEY,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0820RSM

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254

PETITION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, respondent’s

motion to dismiss the petition, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice

Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and

Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Respondent’s motion to dismiss petitioner’s federal habeas petition (Dkt. #15) is

GRANTED and the petition (Dkt. #4) is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d);

(3) Petitioner’s request to stay these proceedings (Dkt. #17) is DENIED; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

Case 2:06-cv-00820-RSM Document 20 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 PETITION

PAGE -2

respondent, and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this 28th day of February, 2007.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00820-RSM Document 20 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.5D


                          SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
                           FOR TEXTRON KEY EXECUTIVES
                          (EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 15, 1994)

                                 THIRD AMENDMENT

Pursuant to Section 7.03 of the Supplemental Retirement Plan for Textron Key
Executives (Effective December 15, 1994) (the "Plan"), Textron Inc. hereby
amends the Plan, as follows:

Section 1.05 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

"`Compensation' means base salary, accrued annual incentive compensation,
performance units, and performance share units, whether or not deferred under
the Deferred Income Plan for Textron Key Executives. However, for any Key
Executive who is first awarded performance share units after October 26, 1999,
performance unit and performance share units shall not be included in
Compensation"

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Textron Inc. has caused this Third Amendment to be executed
by its duly authorized officer effective as of October 26, 1999.

                                TEXTRON INC.


                                By: ____________________________________________
                                    George Metzger
                                    Vice President, Human Resources and Benefits
No. 63931.

protests 58/9365, etc. (New York).

#### Al-Tray Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chewing gum similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fred L. Strauss*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 136, C.D. 2117), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005
A.)

Select Portfolio Servicing, INC.



Agreement:
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Depositor, DLJ Mortgage
Capital, Inc., Seller, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Servicer ,Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., Servicer and Master Servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Servicer
and Special Servicer, The Murrayhill Company, Credit Risk Manager and U.S.
Bank National Association, Trustee - Pooling And Servicing Agreement - Home
Equity Asset Trust 2005-4, Home Equity Pass Through Certificates,
Series 2005-4




Dated:
6/1/2005


ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


In accordance with the applicable section in each of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreements specified

i.	a review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended
December 31, 2005 and of performance under this Agreement has been made
under such officers supervision; and
ii.	to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement throughout
such year.



February 21, 2006


____________________________________
Matthew L. Hollingsworth
Chief Executive Officer
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.


B.)

[WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE LOGO]

						Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
						One Home Campus
						Des Moines, IA 50328-0001




February 24,2006

					Credit Suisse First Boston
					Mortgage Securities Corp., Home
					Equity Asset Trust 2005-4, Home
					Equity Pass-Through Certificates,
					Series 2005-4

Re:	2005 Annual Certification

We hereby certify to the best of our knowledge and belief
that for the calendar year of 2005:

1.All real estate taxes, bonds assessments and other lienable
items have been paid.

2.All FHA mortgage insurance, private mortgage insurance premiums,
and flood insurance have been paid (if applicable).

3.Hazard insurance policies held by us meet the requirements as specified
in the servicing agreement, or those of a normalprudent lender if not
specified,and those premiums due have been paid.

4.We have made all property inspections as required.

5.Fidelity bond and Errors and Omissions insurance coverage currently exists.

6.That the Officer signing this certificate has reviewed the activities
and performance of the Servicer during the preceding fiscal year under
the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing
Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide or similar agreements and to the best
of this officer's knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations of such agreement throughout the year,
or if there has been a default or failure of the servicer to perform any
of such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of each
default or failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported.

Sincerely,

/s/ John B. Brown
John B. Brown
Senior Vice President
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage


				Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
				is a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
### ;-.^:sTl€MT01

-



# K Marc h 16,201 1 

### :ni l 'i^F l ^ 2 P b : U

b U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Managemen t

Syste m 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , SE . Wes t Building , Groun dFloor , Roo mW12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Petitio n fo r

Exemptio n 1 . Nam e an dmailin g addres s - Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc . 15 9 Catamoun t

Driv e Milton , V T 0546 8 Phone : 802-893-100 3 Fax:802-893-015 1 Contact : Eri c Chas e - Presiden t Email : echasel784@aol.co m 2 . Specifi c Exemptio n - Titl e 1 4 CF RPart 12 0 Subpart

D 3 . Exten t

o f Relie f - W e seek

relie f fromhavin g t o maintai n tw o separat e dni g testin g program s require dfor both part 13 5 Ai r Carrie r an d91.14 7 operations . Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc . employee s that ar e require dt o tes t

for 13 5 Air Carrie r operation s ar e th e sam e employee s that ar e require dt o b e teste dfo r 91.14 7 operations . Therefore , Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc . i s proposin g t o maintai n on e dru g testin g progra mrathe r than two . 4 . Benefit s t o th e Publi c - W e woul donl y hav e t o us e enoug h governmen t resource s t o maintai n an dsurvei l on e dru g testin g progra man dMansfiel d Heliflight , Inc . employee s woul db e abl e t o devot e les s non-ta x revenu e producin g tim e participatin g i n an dmaintainin g tw o dru g testin g programs . 5 . Reason s wh y exemptio n woul dno t adversel y affec t

safet y - Mansfiel d HeUflight , Inc . employee s woul dmee t th e requirement s o f

1 4 CF Rpart 12 0 subpart D for 91.14 7 b y bein g teste dfo r part 135 . 6 . Summar y - Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc . i s seekin g rehe f fromhavin g t o maintai n tw o separat e dru g testin g program s require db y 91.14 7 an dpar t 13 5 b y petitionin g for

a n exemptio n that

woul dallo w Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc . to maintai n onl y on e dru g testin g program , sinc e th e sam e employee s ar e teste d fo r bot h th e 91.14 7 an dpart 135 .7 . Additiona l information , view s o r argument s t o suppor t

reques t - Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc . maintain s abou t te n employee s a

t an y give n tim e an di t woul db e redundan t

t o hav e a

n employe e tak e separat e test s fo r bot h th e par t 13 5 air carrie r an d91.14 7 operations , whe n on e tes t woul dsuffice . On e dru g testin g progra mwoul dcu t dow n o n cost s an dth e los s o f productivit y whe n sendin g th e employee s t o th e dru g testin g facility . a . Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc . doe s no t inten t t o exercis e th e privilege s o f thi s exemptio n outsid e o f th e Unite dStates . Respec t flilly i

Presiden t Mansfiel dHeliflight , Inc .