alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Advanced Flight Maneuvers ( * * * ) 

D 

; , 

Fly a circle and keep the aircraft nose pointed towards you. 

Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as 

uniform as possible. 

--------------- --

EJ Fly a 4 point square box clockwise while keeping the aircraft 

nose facing in your direction. 

11 11 

,----- ---- -~, 

, \ 

, : ~ t1 . , \ 

, \ 

,, . \ \ 

·------- ~ -----------

El Fly a 4 point square box counter-clockwise while keeping 

the aircraft nose facing in your direction. 
Advanced Flight Maneuvers <* * *) ~~ Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the 

phantom in the direction of travel. 

®s s@ 

,~ ' ' I ' 

' ------ ----------- &®$ ~~ Fly a circle counter-clockwise and keep the aircraft 

nose pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

--- -----------. 

" ~~----,.._ ___________ .... .. ' 

I , 

m Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the aircraft nose 

pointed at the center of the circle. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as 

possible. 

<ID 
Advanced Flight Maneuvers<***) 

D Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

~ ,' ~ ... -------- '+- ~ -· 

' , ............. J/J!IItl-- ___ c."!.----- ~ 

----~-- ............ 

~ ',, .. ,' 

-------- -----------

Fly a Figure 8 with the aircraft nose of the Phantom 

pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the 

altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

Fly Figure 8 patterns while experimenting with different orientations. 

For example, aircraft nose always pointed in a given direction or 

opposite/left/right the direction of travel, etc. Be sure to keep the 

altitude thesame and the circle as uniform as possible. 
Emergency Situations 

D 

EJ 

Return Home & Land Mode 

Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, 

make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED 

indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom at least 50ft 

away from your take off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. 

The Phantom will enter it's failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. 

Let the Phantom finish it's routine and land itself within 2 meters 

of the take off point. 

• 15 meters 

Intercepting Return Home & Land Mode 

Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make 

sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators 

are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 50ft away from your take 

off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. The Phantom will 

enter it's failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. When the Phantom 

is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching 

the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower 

position, then continue flying the Phantom. 

ltr- ---- - ' 

' 

15 meters • 
www.dji.com 

Copyright:2014 DJIInnovations. All Rights Reserved.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0183 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-131-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

rework center 

overhead stowage 

boxes

32.0 $2,720.0

0

$6,118 $8,838.00 526 $4,648,788.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $4,648,788

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARLOS GENE MOOSE, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 53 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 211 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 211

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 1999

                                Received

                           November 19, 1999

             Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the strong support of the Congress for the recently 
 concluded elections in the Republic of India and urging the President 
                          to travel to India.

Whereas the Republic of India is a longstanding parliamentary democracy where 
        citizens may freely change their government;
Whereas India has a thriving multiparty system where a broad spectrum of 
        political views are represented;
Whereas India recently conducted a successful round of elections, involving over 
        650,000,000 registered voters and

resulting in a 60 percent voter turnout and re-election of Prime Minister 
Atal Bihari Vajpayee;

Whereas India and the United States share a special relationship as the world's 
        most populous democracy and the world's oldest democracy, respectively, 
        and have a shared commitment to upholding the will of the people and the 
        rule of law;
Whereas the President has expressed his continued desire to travel to South 
        Asia; and
Whereas India continues to be a shining example of democracy for all of Asia to 
        follow: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of India on 
        the successful conclusion of their recent national elections;
            (2) congratulates Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee on 
        his re-election;
            (3) calls on the President to travel to India as part of 
        any trip to South Asia; and
            (4) urges the President to broaden our special relationship 
        with India into a strategic partnership.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6336

DARRELL J. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.
SERGEANT JACKSON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center; WARDEN, ALVIN S. GLENN DETENTION CENTER, a/k/a Renaldo Meyers,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03661-CMC)

Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: November 3, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Darrell J. Williams appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Williams v. Jackson , No. 8:07-cv-03661-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 10,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 662 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Assisted Living Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 

Ms. HOOLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Assisted Living 

Week. 

Whereas approximately one million people live in assisted living across the United States; 

Whereas the first of seventy-seven million Baby Boomers will 

begin to reach retirement age in 2011; 

Whereas an estimated 36,000 facilities provide the assisted 

living services used by the elderly and those with disabilities in the United States; 

Whereas assisted living is a long-term care service that fosters choice, dignity, independence, and autonomy for the 

elderly and people with disabilities across the United 

States; and 

Whereas National Assisted Living Week highlights the privilege, value, and responsibility of passing the legacies of 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 662 IH 

the lives of the elderly and those with disabilities down 

through the generations that care for and love them: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Assisted Living Week; and 

4 (2) urges all people of the United States— 

5 (A) to visit friends and loved ones who re6 side at assisted living facilities; and 

7 (B) to learn more about assisted living 

8 services, including how assisted living services 

9 benefit communities in the United States. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[106th Congress Public Law 452]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ452.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1950]]

Public Law 106-452
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2339 North California Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Roberto 
     Clemente Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 7, 2000 -  [H.R. 4831]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2339 
North California Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the Logan 
Square Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Roberto 
Clemente Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roberto Clemente Post 
Office''.

    Approved November 7, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4831:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 10, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Inquiry on Membership in Federal Reserve System

              																	United States. Congress. House					 and 	Sixty-Eighth Congress, 1923-1925. 						*Inquiry on Membership in Federal Reserve System : Joint Hearings Before the Committees on Banking and Currency, Congress of the United States, Sixty-Eighth Congress, Pursuant to Public Act No. 503, October 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, and 12, 1923*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										October 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, and 12, 1923,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/746,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Before the Second Division,

October 10, 1961

No. 66135.

#### Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 312619-KS and 326168-KS (Minneapolis).

*337Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 162, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

     Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-071:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2306

LENIR RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROSYLN CHILDREN CENTER; BRAZILIAN CONSULATE;

LEAH CAKE SOUTHERLIN, Probation Officer;

BEVERLY RUSSELL, Dr.; FAIRFAX COUNTY ADULT

DETENTION CENTER; URSULA KOENIG; ELLEN ZEHL,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

REX PAGERIE, Officer; KATRENE ENGLAND,

Officer,

Defendants.

No. 04-2568

LENIR RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROSYLN CHILDREN CENTER; REX PAGERIE, Officer;

KATRENE ENGLAND, Officer; BRAZILIAN CONSULATE;

LEAH CAKE SOUTHERLIN, Probation Officer;
- 2 -

BEVERLY RUSSELL, Dr.; FAIRFAX COUNTY ADULT

DETENTION CENTER; URSULA KOENIG; ELLEN ZEHL, 

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-04-867)

Submitted: March 25, 2005 Decided: April 13, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

No. 04-2306 dismissed; No. 04-2568 affirmed by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Marvel Ross, COUNTY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Lenir Richardson appeals

a district court order dismissing as frivolous some of her claims

and some of the defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000)

and a district court order dismissing the remainder of her

complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. In No. 04-2306,

we review the district court’s dismissal de novo. We have reviewed

the record and find the district court properly dismissed some

claims and some defendants as frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss

this appeal as frivolous. In No. 04-2568, we have reviewed the

record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Richardson v. Roslyn Children Center,

No. CA-04-867 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2004; entered Nov. 19,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 04-2306 DISMISSED

No. 04-2568 AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MAUDO FOFANA,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO GONZALES,

Respondent.

CASE NO. C06-869JLR

ORDER

This matter comes before the court on Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of

appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (Dkt. # 13) and his motion for extension of time

(Dkt. # 15). Petitioner seeks to appeal the court’s October 30, 2006 judgment denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas corpus petition (Dkt. # 11). 

The court DENIES Petitioner’s motion. The court entered judgment in this case

because Petitioner has not yet exhausted the direct appeal of his underlying conviction. 

Petitioner’s case does not present the “extraordinary circumstances” that would warrant

an exception to the general rule prohibiting habeas review before a Petitioner has

exhausted his direct appeal. The court finds that “reasonable jurists” could not “debate

whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues

presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v.

Case 2:06-cv-00869-JLR Document 16 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER – 2

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (setting standard for granting a certificate of

appealability) (internal quotations omitted).

Because the Respondent did not file a brief opposing Petitioner’s motion for

certificate of appealability, the court DENIES as moot petitioner’s motion for extension

of time to reply to the brief.

As stated above, the court DENIES Petitioner’s motion for certificate of

appealability (Dkt. # 13) and DENIES as moot Petitioner’s motion for an extension of

time (Dkt. # 15).

DATED this 8th day of December, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00869-JLR Document 16 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00195-CV 

FORT WORTH PROFESSIONAL 

FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION

APPELLANT

V.

CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 48-270181-14

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal, Appellee’s 

response to it, Appellant’s reply to Appellee’s response, and Appellee’s surreply. 

No cross-petition for permissive appeal is pending before this court. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 28.3(f). It is therefore the court’s opinion that the motion to dismiss 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

should be granted, and we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 

43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED: August 26, 2014