1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, 

AND EARLY SETTLEMENT - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DOCUSIGN, INC.,

Plaintiff(s), 

v.

HEALTH APPLICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant(s).

CASE NO. C06-907

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL 

DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS 

REPORT, AND EARLY 

SETTLEMENT

I. INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES

Pursuant to the December 1, 2000 revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court sets

the following dates for initial disclosure and submission of the Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan:

Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference: August 28, 2006

Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1): September 5, 2006

Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery

Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) 

and Local Rule CR 16: September 11, 2006

If this case involves claims which are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and (f), please notify

Steven Crozier by telephone at 206-370-8820.

II. JOINT STATUS REPORT & DISCOVERY PLAN

All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to confer and provide the Court with a combined

Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan (the "Report") by September 11, 2006. This conference shall be

by direct and personal communication, whether that be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference.

Case 2:06-cv-00907-MJP Document 9 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, 

AND EARLY SETTLEMENT - 2

The Report will be used in setting a schedule for the prompt completion of the case. It must contain the

following information by corresponding paragraph numbers:

1. A statement of the nature and complexity of the case.

2. A statement of which ADR method (mediation, arbitration, or other) should be used. The

alternatives are described in Local Rule CR 39.1 and in the ADR Reference Guide which is available from

the clerk’s office. If the parties believe there should be no ADR, the reasons for that belief should be

stated.

3. Unless all parties agree that there should be no ADR, a statement of when mediation or

another ADR proceeding under Local Rule CR 39.1 should take place. In most cases, the ADR

proceeding should be held within four months after the Report is filed. It may be resumed, if necessary,

after the first session.

4. A proposed deadline for joining additional parties.

5. A proposed discovery plan that indicates:

A. The date on which the FRCP 26(f) conference and FRCP 26(a) initial disclosures

took place;

B. The subjects on which discovery may be needed and whether discovery should be

conducted in phases or be limited to or focused upon particular issues; 

C. What changes should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed under the

Federal and Local Civil Rules, and what other limitations should be imposed; 

D. A statement of how discovery will be managed so as to minimize expense (e.g., by

foregoing or limiting depositions, exchanging documents informally, etc.); and

E. Any other orders that should be entered by the Court under FRCP 26(c) or under

Local Rule CR 16(b) and (c). 

6. The date by which the remainder of discovery can be completed. 

Case 2:06-cv-00907-MJP Document 9 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, 

AND EARLY SETTLEMENT - 3

7. Whether the parties agree that a full-time Magistrate Judge may conduct all proceedings,

including trial and the entry of judgment, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule MJR 13. 

8. Whether the case should be bifurcated by trying the liability issues before the damages

issues, or bifurcated in any other way.

9. Whether the pretrial statements and pretrial order called for by Local Rules CR 16(e), (h),

(i), and (l), and 16.1 should be dispensed with in whole or in part for the sake of economy.

10. Any other suggestions for shortening or simplifying the case.

11. The date the case will be ready for trial.

12. Whether the trial will be jury or non-jury.

13. The number of trial days required.

14. The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all trial counsel.

15. If, on the due date of the Report, all defendant(s) or respondent(s) have not been served,

counsel for the plaintiff shall advise the Court when service will be effected, why it was not made earlier,

and shall provide a proposed schedule for the required FRCP 26(f) conference and FRCP 26(a) initial

disclosures.

16. Whether any party wishes a scheduling conference prior to a scheduling order being entered

in the case. 

If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate

paragraphs. No separate reports are to be filed.

The time for filing the Report may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension

should be made by telephone to Steven Crozier at 206-370-8820.

If the parties wish to have a status conference with the Court at any time during the pendency of

this action, they should notify the deputy clerk, Eileen Scollard, by telephone at 206-370-8518.

Case 2:06-cv-00907-MJP Document 9 Filed 07/31/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, 

AND EARLY SETTLEMENT - 4

III. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSIBILITY

This Order is issued at the outset of the case, and a copy is delivered by the clerk to counsel for

plaintiff (or plaintiff, if pro se) and any defendants who have appeared. Plaintiff's counsel (or plaintiff, if

pro se) is directed to serve copies of this Order on all parties who appear after this Order is filed within

ten (10) days of receipt of service of each appearance. Plaintiff's counsel (or plaintiff, if pro se) will be

responsible for starting the communications needed to comply with this Order.

IV. EARLY SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION

When civil cases are settled early -- before they become costly and time-consuming -- all parties

and the court benefit. The Federal Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Task Force Report for

this district stated: 

[T]he major ADR related problem is not the percentage of civil cases that ultimately settle,

since statistics demonstrate that approximately 95% of all cases are resolved without trial.

However, the timing of settlement is a major concern. Frequently, under our existing ADR

system, case resolution occurs far too late, after the parties have completed discovery and

incurred substantial expenditure of fees and costs.

The judges of this district have adopted a resolution “approving the Task Force’s recommendation

that court-connected ADR services be provided as early, effectively, and economically as possible in every

suitable case.”

The steps required by this Order are meant to help achieve that goal while preserving the rights of

all parties.

If settlement is achieved, counsel shall notify Eileen Scollard, deputy clerk, at 206-370-8518.

V. SANCTIONS

A failure by any party to comply fully with this Order may result in the imposition of

sanctions.

DATED: July 31, 2006.

AMarsha J. Pechman/U.S. District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00907-MJP Document 9 Filed 07/31/06 Page 4 of 4