alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                        MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                               1
<CASH>                                                                   18,962
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             4,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                 994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         24,297
<PP&E>                                                                    7,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            5,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           28,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     4,265
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                    279
<OTHER-SE>                                                               23,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             28,625
<SALES>                                                                  19,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         21,459
<CGS>                                                                     4,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             4,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         15,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           1,483
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            (109)
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              1,374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                               .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .09
        

</TABLE>
No. 59304.

protest 243394-K (New York).

#### Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that five-twelfths of the quantity consisted of bookmarks in chief value of beads and that seven-twelfths “were bookmarks not in chief value of beads, but manufactures wholly or in chief value of wood.” On the agreed facts, the bookmarks were held dutiable as follows: Five-twelfths of the total imported quantity at 30 percent under paragraph 1503, as amended, *supra,*and seven-twelfths at 16% percent under said amended paragraph 412.
**EXHIBIT23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.333-121172) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-31638, 333-38317, 333-90026,333-116520) of our report dated February 28, 2007 relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Mercer International Inc. as of December 31, 2006and for each of the two years in the period ended December31, 2006 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on those financial statements andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of new accounting standardsfor share-based payments and pension and other postretirementbenefits) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MercerInternational Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/  Deloitte& Touche LLP
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code
  (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Technology Solutions Company.
 Date:
    
    May 15, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ SANDOR GROSZSandor GroszChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            9065
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3305
<ALLOWANCES>                                       621
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          465285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   44926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  467974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         165881
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                      291929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    467974
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15308
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   185
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5446
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 127 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 127

  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
       present a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Rosa Parks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

 Mr. Watts of Oklahoma submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
       present a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Rosa Parks.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on June 15, 
1999, for a ceremony to present a gold medal on behalf of Congress to 
Rosa Parks. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out 
in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
No. 63455.

protests 130924-K, etc. (New York).

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 10.4**

AMENDMENT NO. 2 

TO 

ADVISORY AGREEMENT 

This amendment no. 2 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2006 (the“Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as ofMarch 21, 2007 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement. 

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement and advance funds to the Company upon the terms set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

ADVANCE 

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of this Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the “Advance”)to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through the period ending May 31, 2007 exceeds the amount of the Company’s funds from operations (asdefined by NAREIT) from January 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative funds fromoperations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceed the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date ofsuch reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement.Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 

*Signature page follows.*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first abovewritten. 

 
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.By: 
/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
 Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive OfficerKBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLCBy: Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager By: Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner     By: 
/s/Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
      Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**Soybean Cultivars and Soil Management to Enhance Weed Control for Organic Farming
**Location: Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory**
												Project Number: 1265-22000-164-03Project Type:																				Specific Cooperative Agreement

Start Date: Feb 18, 2005End Date: Dec 31, 2009

**Objective:**Determine soybean traits that improve their capability of competing with weeds. Identify soil and cover crop management practices that enhance weed suppression in organic farming systems.
**Approach:**Cooperate with researchers at USDA-ARS, Beltsville, Rodale Institute, and Penn State University to conduct a broad research program on biologically based weed management. Soybean cultivar experiments will be conducted at USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, and at Rodale Institute, Kutztown, PA to evaluate selected germplasm with a range of traits for height and leaf area in weedy, weed-free, and crop-free plots that are managed organically. Detailed studies of mechanisms that enhance weed suppression and crop vigor will be conducted. Novel approaches for integrating competitive cultivars with cover crop and soil management practices will be explored.
    Project TeamTeasdale, John  
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 
Related National Programs Crop Protection & Quarantine(304)  							Last Modified: 10/14/2009 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Star Resource Corp., a Yukon Territory, Canada corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nevada Star Resource Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Star Resource Corp.



Date:  July 20, 2004



/s/ Robert Angrisano

_____________________________________________

Robert Angrisano, Principal Executive Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Arnoldo Vara Torres v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00300

- CR

Trial court case number: 1317308

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Arnolda Vara Torres, has filed a “ Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to file the Appellant’s Brief.” We deny the motion.

Torres’s brief was originally due on July 12, 2013. On July 25, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified Torres that his brief was late and required a response within 10 days. Torres responded on August 8, 2013, by filing a motion for extension of time to file his brief. We granted the mo tion and required Torres to file his brief by September 6, 2013. On September 25, 2013, Torres filed another motion for extension of time to file his brief, arguing that more time was necessary “[d]ue to [his counsel’s] work load .” We granted the motion, required Torres to file his brief by October 25, 2013, and informed him that no additional motions to extend time would be granted. Nevertheless, Torres filed a third motion for extension of time to file his brief on December 12, 2013, once again contend ing that an extension is necessary “[d]ue to [his counsel’s] work load.”

Given the procedural history of this case and in light of our previous order stating that no further extensions would be granted, we DENY Torres’s motion for extension of

time

. See S andoval v. State , No. 07

- 11

- 0136

- CR, 2011 WL 6059804, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo Dec. 6, 2011, no pet. ) (not designated for publication) (“This Court does not consider a busy work schedule as good cause for granting a subsequent motion to extend the time to file a brief.”); Newfield v. State , 766 S.W.2d 408, 407

– 09 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1989 ), pet. dism’d , improvidently granted , 817 S.W.2d 63 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (denying motion for extension of time to file brief when party requested extension based on counsel’s workload) ; Hubbard v. State , 649 S.W.2d 167, 169 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1983, no writ ) (same)

. Unless this Court receives Torres’s brief within ten (10) days of the date of this

order

, we will abate the case and order the trial court to conduct a hearing pursuant toTexas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8( b ). We suspend the

application of Texas Rule of Appella te Procedure 9.2

— the mailbox rule

— to this deadline to file Torres’s brief, and no extensions of time will be granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2

, 9.2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting individually

Date: January 23

, 2014
Before the Second Division,

June 22, 1967

No. P67/209.

#### J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 66/5670 and 66/4040 (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. DeJong &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(a)/RULE 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, William Y. Tauscher,
certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. [Not applicable]

c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. disclosed in
this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant's other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ William Y. Tauscher
|                    |  | William Y. Tauscher    
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Robert C. Salipante, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keyport Life Insurance Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2003
 */s/ Robert C. Salipante                   
Robert C. Salipante  
President*