alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(a)/RULE 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, Kenneth M. Clinebell,
certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vertical Communications, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |  |  |                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Clinebell
|                    |  |  |  | Kenneth M. Clinebell    
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
# L_2022083EN.01006501.xml

| 10.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 83/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 83/65

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2077 of 26 November 2021 concerning the authorisation of L-valine produced by Corynebacterium glutamicum CGMCC 7.366 as a feed additive for all animal species

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 426 of 29 November 2021
  )

On page 7, in the first column of the Annex:

for:

‘3c371i’,

read:

‘3c371ii’.

---
#### KIVALINA RELOCATION PLANNING COMMITTEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TECK COMINCO ALASKA INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee, Northwest Arctic Borough; et al., Defendant-Intervenors— Appellees.

No. 04-35206.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 11, 2005.

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Brent J. Newell, Esq., Luke W. Cole, Caroline Farrell, Esq., Center on Race, *651Poverty and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lawrence Hartig, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellee.

Heidi P. Stern, Esq., Beckley Singleton, Chtd., Daniel F. Polsenberg, Esq., Las Vegas, NV, Sean Halloran, Esq., Hartig Rhodes Hoge *&*Lekdsch, Anchorage, AK, David S. Case, Esq., Copeland, Landye, Bennett & Wolf, Anchorage, AK, James E. Torgerson, Heller Ehrman White *&*McAuliffe LLP, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, BRUNETTI, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee (KRPC) appeals the district court’s denial of its Rule 59(e) and Rule 15(a) motions. For the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.

We DENY KRPC’s Rule 21 motion, as well as KRPC’s Motion to Strike Motion by Northwest Arctic Borough to Dismiss Appeal and to strike NAB as a party to the Appellees’ brief.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# C_2012250EN.01001201.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2012 — Smurfit Kappa Group v Commission

(Case T-304/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Corrugated case materials - Aid for the construction of a paper mill - Guidelines on national regional aid - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market - Admissibility - Validity of the authority conferred by a legal person on its lawyers - Adoption of a decision upon conclusion of the preliminary examination phase - Standing to bring proceedings - Procedural rights of interested parties - Serious difficulties justifying the initiation of the formal investigation procedure - Exercise by the Commission of its discretion - Article 87(3)(a) EC - Article 88(2) and (3) EC - Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 44(5) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure)

2012/C 250/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Smurfit Kappa Group plc (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: T. Ottervanger and E. Henny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Martenczuk and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Propapier PM 2 GmbH, formerly Propapier PM2 GmbH & Co. KG (Eisenhüttenstadt, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Niemeyer and C. Herrmann, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 1107 of 2 April 2008 declaring compatible with the common market the national regional aid which the German authorities intend to grant to Propapier PM2 for the construction of a paper mill in Eisenhüttenstadt (region of Brandenburg-Nordost) (State aid N 582/2007 — Germany).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2008) 1107 of 2 April 2008 declaring compatible with the common market the national regional aid which the German authorities intend to grant to Propapier PM2 for the construction of a paper mill in Eisenhüttenstadt (region of Brandenburg-Nordost) (State aid N 582/2007 — Germany); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2008) 1107 of 2 April 2008 declaring compatible with the common market the national regional aid which the German authorities intend to grant to Propapier PM2 for the construction of a paper mill in Eisenhüttenstadt (region of Brandenburg-Nordost) (State aid N 582/2007 — Germany);

| 2. | Orders the European Commission and Propapier PM 2 GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission and Propapier PM 2 GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.

1

---
March 28, 1962

No. 66639.

#### Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/24443.

Protest abandoned February 16, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 60/18854.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00432

- CR

IN RE ADAM HOFFMAN

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s motion to withdraw petition for writ of mandamus is granted in part,

and the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as mo ot.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted in part; petition dismissed as moot

Opinion delivered and filed March 16 , 2011

Do not publish

[OT06]
No. 65280.

#### Aut Customs Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/18314 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 385

Expressing the sense of Congress that the House of Heroes project in Columbus, Georgia, should serve as a model for public service support for

the Nation’s veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. COLLINS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the House of Heroes

project in Columbus, Georgia, should serve as a model

for public service support for the Nation’s veterans.

Whereas the veterans of the United States have made immeasurable sacrifices for the preservation of freedom for

America;

Whereas the people of Columbus, Georgia, have demonstrated

an appreciation for the commitments made by veterans

and their families, through the House of Heroes project;

Whereas the House of Heroes project was created specifically

to honor veterans and their families by providing assistance with repair, maintenance, and improvement of veterans’ primary residences; and
2

•HCON 385 IH

Whereas the House of Heroes project is comprised of volunteers from the Columbus, Georgia, area representing a

broad cross section of the local community, including

military personnel, businesses, trade organizations, Federal and local Governments, charitable funds, and individual citizens who have joined together to support local

veterans who have played such an important role in the

long-term preservation of freedom in this country: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the House

of Heroes project of Columbus, Georgia, should serve as a

public service model for communities across the United

States effectively to provide needed assistance and support

for veterans who so bravely served their communities and

their country.

Æ
No. 60315.

protests 286973-K, etc. (New York).

#### Belgard & Prank, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
Summary of Comments on

NUREG0282forPDF

NUREG0282forPDF contains no comments
**Exhibit 10.20**

**AMENDMENT NO. 2**

**TO THE**

**ADVISORY AGREEMENT**

This amendment no. 2 to the Advisory Agreement dated as ofNovember 8, 2007 (the “Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the“Advisor”), is entered as of March 26, 2008 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement. 

WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement and advance fundsto the Company upon the terms set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants andagreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

**ADVANCE**

Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of this Agreement to the contrary, theAdvisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the “Advance”) to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through the period ending May 31, 2008 exceedsthe amount of the Company’s funds from operations (as defined by NAREIT) from January 1, 2006 through May 31, 2008. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to theextent that the Company’s cumulative funds from operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceed the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payableto the Company’s Stockholders as of the date of such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period fromJuly 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 

*Signature page follows.*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first abovewritten. 

 
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.By: 
/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
 Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive OfficerKBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLCBy: 
Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a

Manager
  By: 
Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general

partner
   By: 
/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
    Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 16854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06723]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8672]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Terra Cotta Warriors: The Emperor's Painted Army, 
Directly From China's Shaanxi Province'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Terra Cotta Warriors: The Emperor's 
Painted Army, Directly from China's Shaanxi Province,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Children's 
Museum of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, from on or about May 9, 2014, 
until on or about November 2, 2014, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 19, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-06723 Filed 3-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
(Reap. Dec. 10841)

#### Authentic Furniture Products, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 753833-1, etc.

(Decided November 4, 1964)

*Stem & Shostalc*for tbe plaintiffs.

*Jolm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe respective parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court:

> 1. That tbe merchandise covered by tbe appeals for reappraisement enumerated in tbe attached Schedule of Oases, manufactured by Otsubo Kogyo or by Kashiwa Mokko, Ltd., consists of wall shelves and other wood furniture, and that, at tbe time of exportation thereof to tbe United States, tbe market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of tbe country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in tbe ordinary course of trade, for exportation to tbe United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, net packed.

> 2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> 3. That the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in See. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 4. That the merchandise and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those in *Authentic Furniture Products*v. *United States,*51 Cust. Ct. 438, Reap. Dec. 10614, Advance Treasury Decisions, Vol. 98, No. 45, page 113, and that the record in said case may be incorporated with the record herein.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find and bold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of the merchandise here in question and that such value was tbe invoice unit values, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2019

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2019

158380(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158380

COA: 343584

Wayne CC: 88

- 002156

- FC

CHARLES CAUSEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Feb ruary 4,

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
**Certification**

I, Yan Liu, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board of Toro Ventures Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of the Company.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and have:

    a.    designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byother within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

    b.    (paragraph omitted pursuantto SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;)

    c.    evaluated the effectivenessof the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

    d.    disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the Company's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting ; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of theCompany's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a.    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

    b.    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/ "Yan Liu"

Yan Liu

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial OFfficer andChairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer)

September 26, 2007
No. 58766.

protest 238057-K (New York).

#### D. C. Andrews *&*Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.