alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 290TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 23, 2014, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

James Garza, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-11-00891-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2009CR12648A

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portion of the

trial court’s judgment imposing a sentence of life without the possibility of

parole is REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED for resentencing in

accordance with this court’s opinion.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on May 29, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 71541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9079-006]


R.J. Fortier Hydropower, Inc., Northeast Community Services, 
Inc.; Notice of Transfer of Exemption

    1. On September 18, 2023, Northeast Community Services, Inc. filed 
a notification of the transfer for the 65-kilowatt Upper Spears Stream 
Hydroelectric Project No. 9079 from R.J. Fortier Hydropower, Inc. to 
Northeast Community Services, Inc. The exemption from licensing was 
originally issued on September 30, 1985.\1\ The project is located on 
the Upper Spears Stream, Oxford County, Maine. The transfer of an 
exemption does not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Mark A. Vaughn, 32 FERC ] 62,716 (1985). Subsequently, on 
March 31, 2004, the project was transferred to R.J. Fortier 
Hydropower Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Northeast Community Services, Inc. is now the exemptee of the 
Upper Spears Stream Hydroelectric Project No. 9079. All correspondence 
must be forwarded to Tyler A. Hicks, President, Northeast Community 
Services, Inc., Massachusetts Address: 257 Union Street, New Bedford, 
MA 02740, Maine address: 10 Murray Street, Bingham, ME 04920, Phone: 
(508) 851-9158, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9c7c6dbddc1ccc8daddcac6c4c4dcc7c0ddd0daccdbdfc0caccdae9cec4c8c0c587cac6c4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66080914120e0307151205090b0b13080f121f150314100f05031526010b070f0a4805090b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 11, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22888 Filed 10-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the First Division,

January 5, 1948

No. 52090.

protests 132647-K, etc. (New York).

#### Indestructible Pearl Bead Makers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of alabaster glass beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained.
No. 55046.

#### C. R. Springman *v.*United States,

protest 151923-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Exhibit 10.28
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD
PURSUANT TO THE 2007 PET DRx CORPORATION
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
  A.
    
    Grant Date: _______________B.
    
    Type of Option: Non-Qualified Stock Option.C.
    
    Plan (under which Option is granted): 2007 Pet DRx Corporation Stock Incentive Plan.D.
    
    Option Shares: _________ shares of the Companys common stock (the Common Stock), subject
to adjustment as provided in the attached Terms and Conditions.E.
    
    Exercise Price: $______ per share, subject to adjustment as provided in the attached Terms
and Conditions. The Exercise Price not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of
Common Stock on the Grant Date.F.
    
    Option Period: The Option may be exercised only during the Option Period which commences on
the Grant Date and ends on the earliest of:
 (i)
    
    the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Grant Date;(ii)
    
    three (3) months following the date the Optionee ceases to be an employee,
director, or contractor of the Company and all Affiliates (as defined in the Plan) for
any reason other than death, Disability (defined in the Plan) or termination by the
Company or any Affiliate with Cause; or(iii)
    
    twelve (12) months following the date the Optionee ceases to be an employee,
director, or contractor of the Company and all Affiliates due to death or Disability.
  (i)
    
    the date the Optionee ceases to be an employee, director, or contractor of the
Company or an Affiliate due to termination of employment by the Company or any Affiliate
with Cause; or(ii)
    
    the date the Optionee violates any non-solicitation or non-compete agreement with
the Company or an Affiliate.
 The Option may only be exercised as to the vested Option Shares determined pursuant to the
Vesting Schedule. Note that other restrictions to exercising the Option, as described in the
attached Terms and Conditions and the Plan, may apply.G.
    
    Vesting Schedule: The Option shall become vested in accordance with the vesting schedule
attached hereto as Schedule 1. Any portion of the Option which is not vested at the time of
Optionees termination of employment or services with the Company shall be forfeited to the
Company with no consideration due to the Optionee.
   OPTIONEE
 PET DRx CORPORATIONBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO THE
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD
PURSUANT TO THE
2007 PET DRx CORPORATION STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Exercise of Option
 multiplied by
    Withholding
 Rights as Shareholder




---



##### 



Restriction on Transfer of Option and Option Shares
 Changes in Capitalization
    Special Limitations on Exercise
 Legend on Stock Certificates
 Governing Laws




---



##### 



Successors
 Notice
 Severability
 Entire Agreement
 Violation
 Headings
 Specific Performance
 No Right to Continued Service
 Definitions
 Cause
 Change in Control




---



##### 



Good Reason
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
 DATE: September 12, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Byron L. BergrenByron L. BergrenPresident and Chief
Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Keith E. PlowmanKeith E. PlowmanExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 96 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 96

Proclaiming the week of March 15 through March 21, 1998, as ``National 
                           Safe Place Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 1997

Mr. Craig submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Proclaiming the week of March 15 through March 21, 1998, as ``National 
                           Safe Place Week''.

Whereas today's youth are vital to the preservation of our country and will be 
        the future bearers of the bright torch of democracy;
Whereas youth need a safe haven from various negative influences such as child 
        abuse, substance abuse and crime, and they need to have resources 
        readily available to assist them when faced with circumstances that 
        compromise their safety;
Whereas the United States needs increased numbers of community volunteers acting 
        as positive influences on the Nation's youth;
Whereas the Safe Place program is committed to protecting our Nation's most 
        valuable asset, our youth, by offering short term ``safe places'' at 
        neighborhood locations where more than 2,500 trained volunteers are 
        available to counsel and advise youth seeking assistance and guidance;
Whereas Safe Place combines the efforts of the private sector and non-profit 
        organizations uniting to reach youth in the early stages of crisis;
Whereas Safe Place provides a direct means to assist programs in meeting 
        performance standards relative to outreach/community relations, as set 
        forth in the Federal runaway and homeless youth guidelines;
Whereas the Safe Place placard displayed at businesses within communities stands 
        as a beacon of safety and refuge to at-risk youth;
Whereas currently 34 States and more than 6,000 business locations have 
        established Safe Place programs; and
Whereas increased awareness of the program's existence will encourage 
        communities to establish Safe Places for the Nation's youth throughout 
        the country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) proclaims the week of March 15 through March 21, 1998, 
        as ``National Safe Place Week''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to promote awareness of and volunteer involvement in the 
        Safe Place organization, and to observe the week with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WTC
INDUSTRIES, INC. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF
JUNE 30, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  471,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,000
<INVENTORY>                                    777,459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,276,200
<PP&E>                                         907,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                 588,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,656,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,965,337
<BONDS>                                      1,461,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,602
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,880,306)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,656,271
<SALES>                                      2,398,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,398,951
<CGS>                                        1,775,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  824,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (365,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (365,074)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (365,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San An tonio, Texas** 

June 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00199

- CR

Gabriel JIMENEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR0420

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court reporter ’ s extension of time to file the record is NOTED. Time is extended to

July 13, 2015. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE

RECORD ARE DISFAVORED

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LEONARDO LOPEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-614M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: December 20, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

Case 2:05-cr-00461-MJP Document 8 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(3) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will 

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 20th day of December, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00461-MJP Document 8 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10844)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 299.

(Decided November 4, 1964)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement presents the question of the proper dutiable value of certain bicycle tires, tubes, and tapes, exported from Holland.

The appeal for a reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation of fact agreed to by the parties, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows :

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise as that specified below was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, were the following unit invoiced prices net packed:

> Invoices

> Tires Per 100

> 2600 24 x 1.75 whitewall-$75. 09

> Tubes

> 2600 24 x 1.75 butyl_ 31. 50

> 7500 26 x 1.75 butyl_ 32.48

> Tapes

> 2600 24 x 1.75 _ 2.77

> 7500 24 x 1.75 _ 2.77

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeal herein may be submitted for decision on this stipulation and is limited to the merchandise described and specified in the said stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts of record, the court finds and holds that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C. §1401a(b)), is the proper basis of value for the bicycle tires, tubes, and tapes in issue and that said value is as follows:

> Tires Per 100

> 2600 24 x 1.75 whitewall_$75. 09

> Tubes

> 2600 24 x 1.75 butyl_ 31. 50

> 7500 26 x 1.75 butyl_ 32.48

> Tapes

> 2600 24 x 1.75_ 2.77

> 7500 24 x 1.75_ 2.77

*470As to all other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 54429.

#### International Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 135626-K/12950 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was agreed that in liquidation the collector did not follow the appraiser’s final report of clean content of the wool, i. e., 54 percent, but assessed the 93 bales with duty based upon 76 percent clean content, upon a net weight of 112,339 pounds, as reported by the United States weigher. In view of the stipulation and section 13.13 (6), Customs Regulations of 1943, that liquidated duties shall be determined upon the basis of the appraiser’s final report of clean content, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51202.

#### Protests 124618-K, etc., of Excelsior Merchandising Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
CAL-ORE Life Flight, LLC. JXKA142B 

d/b/a DK Air, LLC. 1 OMJW27 

202 Dale Rupert Rd. 

Crescent City, CA 95531 

April25, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket (No. FAA-2012-0362) 

Dear. ms. Klepper: 

t-\ "' ,,. 'O· , I:J ,_ 

CAL-ORE would like to add this information to our petition of the Federal Administration for 

exemption from 14 CFR Part 120. CAL-ORE requests an exemption from having to maintain 

two separate Anti-Drug and Alcohol programs. 

Currently CAL-ORE maintains Anti-Drug and alcohol programs 

Part 135 On-Demand Air Charter. Cert. JXKA142B 

Part91.147 Passenger Carrying-Scenic Flight Tour Operations. Cert. IOMJW27 

We were advised that to operate DK Air, LLC. As a d/b/a (opspec A049) we would need a 

separate program or be added to the CA-ORE program. 

CAL-ORE has full operational control ofDK, Air, all personnel to maintain and operate the DK. 

Air aircraft are enrolled in the CAL-ORE programs, all aircraft operated are listed in our opspec 

A003. 

The redundancy of testing would be costly to us as a small business, both testing fees and 

monthly maintenance costs through our consortium. 

We believe that having one program for all pilots and our maintenance personnel will streamline 

operations for our Anti-drug and alcohol program managers making the management and 

implementation more efficient. 

The benefit to our company will come in the form of decreased cost and more efficient use of 

employee time. 

Public safety shall not be compromised; the program will not change as all safety sensitive 

employees will continue to be enrolled and subject to the same program rules as they currently 

are. 
Benefits to the public will be to eliminate redundancy, therefore decreasing costs to the 

American taxpayer, by utilizing the same FAA Anti-Drug and Alcohol Abatement on a single 

visit annually. 

If additional information is required, please contact me, cell 707-218-7867 

t2u/v~ Robert Walker 

Chief Pilot 

Anti-Drug Program 

Manager
April 12, 1956

No. 59852.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 7183-R.

Petitioner’s application for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 383 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 383

    Expressing the sense of the Congress that environmentally sound 
  processes for dry and wet cleaning should be accepted by financial 
                   institutions as safe investments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Manzullo (for himself, Mr. Camp, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. 
  Frost, Mrs. Meek of Florida, and Mr. Wise) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Banking 
                         and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the Congress that environmentally sound 
  processes for dry and wet cleaning should be accepted by financial 
                   institutions as safe investments.

Whereas financial institutions have been justifiably reluctant to provide loans 
        to garment or fabric cleaning businesses involved in the use of 
        hazardous chemicals and production of wastes;
Whereas financial institutions have been reluctant to lend capital to small 
        garment or fabric cleaning businesses because of their use of the 
        chemical perchloroethylene (perc) or petroleum-based cleaning solvents 
        that cause harmful airborne emissions and contaminate groundwater;
Whereas new technologies are available which could almost entirely eliminate 
        these concerns;
Whereas new dry and wet cleaning technologies are available that use water or 
        carbon dioxide, which are safe and naturally occurring substances that 
        cause no harmful side effects through contamination of soil, air, and 
        water; and
Whereas only some financial institutions have now begun a process of lending to 
        small garment or fabric cleaning businesses that utilize environmentally 
        sound products and practices: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress urges financial institutions--
            (1) to promote environmentally responsible dry and wet 
        cleaning processes; and
            (2) to work with business enterprises to provide streams of 
        capital to protect the environment.
                                 <all>
```