alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    320,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           4,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 343,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        229,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           522
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   343,441
<SALES>                                         67,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,795
<CGS>                                           61,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,574)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

May 19, 1964

No. 68565.

protests 61/23828 and 61/23734 (New York).

#### I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. and Borneo Sumatra Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. *Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

CA 18-2

March 6, 2018 

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all institutions 

supervised by the Federal Reserve, including those with total consolidated assets of $10 billion 

or less.

SUBJECT: Revised “A Guide to HMDA Reporting: Getting It Right!”

The Task Force on Consumer Compliance of the Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council recently developed a revised version of “A Guide to HMDA Reporting: 

Getting It Right!” (Guide). The updated Guide is for use in connection with Home Mortgage 

Disclosure Act (HMDA)1

 data collected beginning on January 1, 2018 pursuant to the Consumer 

Financial Protection Bureau’s (Bureau) October 15, 2015 and August 24, 2017 amendments to 

Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure).2 

HMDA and Regulation C require certain depository institutions and for-profit nondepository institutions to collect, report, and disclose data about originations and purchases of 

mortgage loans as well as mortgage loan applications that do not result in originations. The 

Bureau’s October 2015 and August 2017 final rules modified: (1) the types of institutions that 

are subject to Regulation C; (2) the types of transactions that are subject to Regulation C; (3) the 

types of data that institutions are required to collect, record, and report pursuant to Regulation C; 

and (4) the corresponding processes for reporting and disclosing HMDA data. 

The updated Guide – which applies to HMDA data collected beginning on January 1, 

2018 that is to be submitted by March 1, 2019 – is intended to assist financial institutions to 

comply with HMDA and Regulation C by providing helpful background information and an 

easy-to-use summary of key provisions, including regarding institutional coverage, transactional 

coverage, and data collection, reporting, and disclosure requirements. 

1 12 U.S.C. 2801 et seq. 

2 See 80 FR 66127 (October 28, 2015); 82 FR 43088 (September 13, 2017). 
2 

If you have any questions, please contact Amal Patel, Senior Supervisory Consumer 

Financial Services Analyst, at (202) 912-7879, or Tim Robertson, Manager, at (202) 452-2565. 

In addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s public website.3 

Sincerely, 

Carol A. Evans 

Associate Director

Attachment:

• Revised “A Guide to HMDA Reporting: Getting It Right!”

Cross-references: 

• CA 17-4 “Expectations for Supervised Institutions Regarding Amended Regulation C”

(December 21, 2017)

• CA 17-3 “Designated Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Key Data Fields” (October 17,

2017)

• CA 17-2 “Revised Interagency Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Sampling, Verification,

and Resubmission Procedures” (August 22, 2017)

3 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 Technology Solutions Company
Non-Statutory
Inducement Stock Option Agreement
  Employee Name:Number of Shares Subject to Option:Exercise Price Per Share:Exercise Provisions:




---



##### 



General:
  - 2 -




---



##### 



EMPLOYEE
    
    
    
    TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS COMPANYBy:Name:
    
    
    
    Name:Title:
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Annex I
to
Inducement Stock Option Agreement
 Meaning of Certain Terms
 Time and Manner of Exercise of Option
 Term and Termination of Option
 Exercisability of Option
 Procedure for Exercise; Payment of Purchase Price




---



##### 



Additional Terms and Conditions of Option
 Nontransferability of Option
 Investment Representation
  - 2 -




---



##### 



Withholding Taxes
 Adjustments in the Event of Capitalization Changes
 Compliance with Applicable Law
 Indemnification
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Delivery of Certificates
 Option Confers No Rights as Stockholder
 Option Confers No Rights to Continued Employment
 Decisions of Committee
 Company to Reserve Shares
 Miscellaneous Provisions
 Designation as Nonqualified Stock Option
 Successors
 Notices
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Governing Law
 - 5 -
EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Steven
G. Manson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Steven G. Manson
                                        ----------------------------------------
Dated: May 15, 2003                     Steven G. Manson
                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Artisoft,  Inc. and will be retained by Artisoft, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the First Division,

June 8, 1965

No. 69354.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 325160-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 8, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00507

- CR

Juan Deltoro, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the part ies ’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appe llan t is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
# Official Journal C 238/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 238 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 493 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 238

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 493 October 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | European Parliament |
| 2006/C 238/1 | Conference of Committees for European and Community Affairs of the European Union Parliaments (COSAC) — Contribution adopted by the XXXVth COSAC — Vienna, 22 to 23 May 2006 | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 238/2 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

European Parliament

2006/C 238/1

Conference of Committees for European and Community Affairs of the European Union Parliaments (COSAC) — Contribution adopted by the XXXVth COSAC — Vienna, 22 to 23 May 2006

1

Commission

2006/C 238/2

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER VACATING

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

KATHRYN NURRE, )

) No. C06-901RSL

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER VACATING ORDER

DR. CAROL WHITEHEAD, in her individual ) TO SHOW CAUSE

and official capacity as the Superintendent of )

Everett School District No. 2, )

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On May 7, 2007, the Court ordered

plaintiff to deliver a courtesy copy of documents she filed on April 26, 2007. Plaintiff has now

done so. The Order to Show Cause (Dkt. # 22) is hereby VACATED: plaintiff need not take

any further action in response to the Order to Show Cause.

DATED this 9th day of May, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00901-RSL Document 24 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 1
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

TOMAS AFEWORKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEVE THOMPSON, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-0628-MJP-MAT

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion

for reconsideration of the Court’s Order of October 23, 2006, denying plaintiff’s prior motion for

default judgment. (Dkt. #25). In his motion for reconsideration, plaintiff contends that the Court

erred when the Court found that the motion should be denied because defendants had timely filed

their answer. (Dkt. #26). Plaintiff also objects to his case being referred for non-dispositive

matters to a United States Magistrate Judge. Having considered the motion for reconsideration,

and the balance of the record, the Court does hereby find and Order as follows:

(1) The Court stated in the Order denying plaintiff’s motion for default that defendants’

answer was timely because it was filed on October 5, 2006. Upon further review, it appears that

Case 2:06-cv-00628-MJP Document 27 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE -2

this statement was inaccurate in two respects: First, defendants actually filed the answer on

October 4, 2006, and second, it appears that the answer was due by October 3, 2006. Thus, while

plaintiff is correct in his assertion that the answer was filed late, he does not show or even argue

that he suffered any prejudice by the one-day delay. Because default judgments are disfavored,

the Court declines to alter its previous conclusion based upon this minor delay. See Direct Mail

Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized, 840 F.2d 685, 689 (9th Cir. 1988).

(2) Regarding plaintiff’s objection to the referral of this case to a Magistrate Judge,

plaintiff is advised that authority for such referral derives from 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed. R. Civ. P.

72, and Local Rules MJR 3 and 4. Plaintiff is further advised that decisions on dispositive

motions, such a motion for summary judgment, will be made by a District Judge, upon review of

a Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge.

(3) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for defendants, and

to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 2nd day of November, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00628-MJP Document 27 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[111th Congress Public Law 36]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

Public Law 111-36
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to provide for 
 agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by 
           webcasters. <<NOTE: June 30, 2009 -  [H.R. 2344]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Webcaster 
Settlement Act of 2009.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 17 USC 101 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009''.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENTS.

    Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
        ``2008, the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009,'';
            (2) in subparagraph (E)(iii), by striking ``to make eligible 
        nonsubscription transmissions and ephemeral recordings''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``February 15, 2009'' 
        and inserting ``at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the 30th day after 
        the date of the enactment of the Webcaster Settlement Act of 
        2009''.

    Approved June 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2344:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-139 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            June 9, considered and passed House.
            June 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 60618.

#### Senter Brass Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 192423-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Artisoft, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Steven G. Manson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Steven G. Manson
                                        ----------------------------------------
Dated: May 15, 2003                     Steven G. Manson
                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Artisoft, Inc. and will be retained by Artisoft, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

February 7, 1968

No. P68/52.

protests 316196-K/14985, etc. (New Orleans).

No. P68/53.

protests 321660-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States, National Silver Company *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Com*pany, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

August 21, 1957

No. 61159.

protest 290565-K (New York).

#### Pfaff Amer. Sales Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that each of the items of merchandise in question, when joined together with a sewing-machine head, included in the same importation, forms a complete article of commerce known as a portable sewing machine, and that the items in question and said sewing-machine heads are integral parts of such portable sewing machines, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Chugach Electric Association, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, I,
Michael R. Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(a) This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 14, 2003

                                                     /s/Michael R. Cunningham
                                                     Michael R. Cunningham
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
-- Doug -* 1 

- - 1 Fw: Follow up information 

Karrna <>Connor Frances W~cher, W~enke Tax 0811012011 06 17 AM Douglas Ito, Chlef 

, .. .... : 

Air Quality and Transportation Planning Branch Karina OConnorlR9IUSEPNUS Air Resources Board jc;. Frances Wicher/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Wienke TaxlR9/USEPNUS@EPA -. (916) 322-0285 $..!I : <>,. ,.,;. This message has been forwarded- dito@arb.ca.gov<mailto:dito@arb.ca.gov> 

2 attachments 

SJV SIP Update Chart 080911.docxSC SIP Update Chart 080911.docx 

Fyi 

Karina O'Connor 

(775) 434-8176 

oconnor.karina@epa.gov 

----- Forwarded by Karina OConnor/R9/USEPA/US on 08/10/2011 06:17AM ----- 

----------------------- -------- ~ 

To: Karina OConnor/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Elizabeth Adams/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Rudolph 

Kapichak/PA/USEPAIUS@EPA 

From: "Ito, Doug@ARBm <dito@arb.ca.gov> 

Date: 08/09/2011 05:16PM 

Cc: "Llndberg, Jeff@ARBn <jllndber@arb.ca.gov>, "Murchison, Linda@ARBU 

<lmurchis@arb.ca.gov>, "Karperos, Kurt@ARBW <kkarpero@arb.ca.gov>, "Terry, 

Lynn@ARBP <lterry@arb.ca.gov,, "Crow, Jason@ARBU <]crow@arb.ca.gov>, "Taylor, 

Jon@ARBU <jtaylor@arb.ca.gov>, "Magliano, Karen@ARBn <kmaglian@arb.ca.gov> 

Subject: Follow up information ....................... 

....................... 

Karina, Elizabeth, and Rudy, 

Thanks for the call this afternoon. Here are the updated tables providing the 

additional clarifications we discussed. 

In addition, as mentioned on the call, the quantified changes to SJV Rule 9310 

(school buses) and SJV Rule 9410 (Employer based trip reduction) can be found 

individually in the line item adjustments included in the 2011 SIP Revision. 

The budget calculation in the 2007 SIP included two District rules, 9510 

(Indirect Source Review) and 9310 (School Buses!, in the "Existing Local 

Measure Reduction'' line item. Since we removed the benefits from ISR, the 

~updared budgets in the 2011 Revision (documented on pages C-6 through C-8) now 

only include District rule 9310 which was updated to reflect changes in the 

new truck model. 

The 2007 SIP budget calculation also identifled a "New/Proposed Measures - 

Local Reductions" line item which included the emission reductions from an 

employed-based trip redliction lomitment. That rule (Dlstrlct rule 9410 - 

Employer Baaed Trip Reduction) has now been adopted locally, so the updated 

budgets in the 2011 SIP Revision include the estimated emission reductions 

from the adopted rule (see tables on pages C-6 through C-8 "New/Proposed 

Measures - Local Reductions" line item). 

Regards,