alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2004-1052Version 1.0

## Lifelines and Earthquake Hazards in the Interstate 5 Urban Corridor:  Cottage Grove to Woodburn, Oregon

### *By* E.A. Barnett, C.S. Weaver, K.L. Meagher, Z. Wang, I.P. Madin, M. Wang, R.A. Haugerud, R.E. Wells, D.B. Ballantyne, M. Darienzo, and the Southern Willamette Valley Working Group

##### 2004

| The Interstate 5 highway corridor, stretching from Mexico to Canada, is not only the economic artery of the Pacific Northwest, but is also home to the majority of Oregonians and Washingtonians. Accordingly, most regional utility and transportation systems, such as railroads and electrical transmission lines, have major components in the I-5 corridor. The section of I-5 from Cottage Grove, Oregon, to Blaine, Washington, is rapidly urbanizing, with population growth and economic development centered around the cities of Eugene, Salem, Portland, Olympia, Tacoma, Seattle, Everett, and Bellingham. For the purposes of this map, we refer to this area as the I-5 Urban Corridor.

This publicaton consists of two large sheets:  A map and a text-and-figures poster. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Download the 36x48 poster as a PDF document (3.1 MB)

Download the 36x55 map as a PDF document (11.5 MB) 

----

See also: USGS Open-File Report 2005-1085, Lifelines and Earthquake Hazards along the Interstate 5 Urban Corridor: Woodburn, Oregon to Centralia, Washington

For questions about the content of this report, contact Elizabeth Barnett

Version history

----

Acrobat   Reader for free

| Help   | PDF help   | Publications main page | Open-File   Reports for 2004 || Privacy   Statement | Disclaimer   | Accessibility || Geologic   Division | Earthquake Hazards Program    |This report is available only on the Web| Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey |URL of this page: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1052/Maintained by: Michael DigglesDate created: June 7, 2004Date last modified: July 22, 2005 (mfd)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 228 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 228

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the members of the Armed Forces and Federal civilian employees 
who served the Nation during the Vietnam era and the families of those 
  individuals who lost their lives or remain unaccounted for or were 
injured during that era in Southeast Asia or elsewhere in the world in 
         defense of United States national security interests.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 228

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States Armed Forces conducted military operations in 
        Southeast Asia during the period (known as the ``Vietnam era'') from 
        February 28, 1961, to May 7, 1975;
Whereas during the Vietnam era more than 3,403,000 American military personnel 
        served in the Republic of Vietnam and elsewhere in Southeast Asia in 
        support of United States military operations in Vietnam, while millions 
        more provided for the Nation's defense in other parts of the world;
Whereas during the Vietnam era untold numbers of civilian personnel of the 
        United States Government also served in support of United States 
        operations in Southeast Asia and elsewhere in the world;
Whereas May 7, 2000, marks the 25th anniversary of the closing of the period 
        known as the Vietnam era; and
Whereas that date would be an appropriate occasion to recognize and express 
        appreciation for the individuals who served the Nation in Southeast Asia 
        and elsewhere in the world during the Vietnam era: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) honors the service and sacrifice of the members of the 
        Armed Forces and Federal civilian employees who during the 
        Vietnam era served the Nation in the Republic of Vietnam and 
        elsewhere in Southeast Asia or otherwise served in support of 
        United States operations in Vietnam and in support of United 
        States national security interests throughout the world;
            (2) recognizes and honors the sacrifice of the families of 
        those individuals referred to in paragraph (1) who lost their 
        lives or remain unaccounted for or were injured during that 
        era, in Southeast Asia or elsewhere in the world, in defense of 
        United States national security interests; and
            (3) encourages the American people, through appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities, to recognize the service and 
        sacrifice of those individuals.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
September 29, 1953

No. 57509.

#### Allen Forwarding Co. *v.*United States,

protest 141795-K.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUAN ORTIZ-SILVA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 06-410M

DETENTION ORDER

Offense charged:

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: August 3, 2006.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds the

following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The Pretrial Services Report of August 3, 2006 reveals that there is an immigration

detainer lodged against the defendant.

Case 2:06-cr-00269-RSL Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant was born in and is a citizen of Mexico.

(3) There is no information available to show that defendant has any ties to this

community or to the Western District of Washington.

(4) Defendant has a criminal background history revealing prior charges and

convictions.

(5) Defendant is viewed as a risk of nonappearance because of the nature of the instant

charge and as a risk of danger based on his criminal history.

(6) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions other than detention

that will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the

community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

/ / /

Case 2:06-cr-00269-RSL Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 3
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 3

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 3rd day of August, 2006.

s/ James P. Donohue 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00269-RSL Document 6 Filed 08/03/06 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 OF STARWOOD
HOTELS AND RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC. WHICH INCLUDE THE ACCOUNTS OF STARWOOD HOTELS
AND RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC. AND WESTIN FROM THE DATE OF THE ITT MERGER ON
FEBRUARY 23, 1998 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE ACCOUNTS OF ITT AS OF AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.

EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 28, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000316206
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,098
<PP&E>                                           6,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,368
<BONDS>                                         10,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,471
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,294
<CGS>                                            4,614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (6)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (80)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,116
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.54)
        

</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- :J<t I 3 -0 1 '3D Directorate Identifier: 

c:lt) 1"3:; -J £_ - 0 7 ~ 4.b 

-AD 

(/"you make changes to the values in the fab le below. you must ensure the lo!als update occordingly (l 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out oft he changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Replace Diaphragm 4.0 ,. \_i I 53 .00 ' { !, 400 ' i '7.2,)1).()11 

) l .; ) j fhl \ () .00 

' ').' ' (•I• ) !I O(J 

l I) ('( ') 0.00 

11 ( (' On 1:, 0.00 

' (li , I (":f, " () ()() 

'I I' ' '•\) ') U.OO 

' ) n• ' f;.()() 

\ (J \ { I \' ,, 00 

() (llJ . ' ) 0.0\• 

(l .r '· ' (J.[)(J 

' '1,"•0 .1,1 11.00 

' (l ( t I \l( ) [' {)(' 

n (, I ()t, .... () ,()(} 

\ O.IJfl 1 1.1 ) I i}(l 

' t' (l( 'I.!' ) ~ 0.00 

{!('\I ' ;it $ () .()0 

" f\ c \I tl ,) !).(,() 

I \1 I ! ill' ) 0.00 

I• '·) \ () .00 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $157,200 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $157200 

On-Condition Costs: . , 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) \ () .. '; (1,()0 

... \I 'J(J \ I (I 

() ( li) .,.. lj. ){' 

<:., () II l (' ().()(1 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

7 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action ; 

YES* 0 NO [gj 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? -

YES* 0 NO [gj 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES 0 NO [gj 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO [gj 

*Explanation: 

8
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 16134A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–7201

Mr. John L. Thomas, II

Counsel for Drone Services Orlando, LLC

611 N. Wymore Road, Suite 105

Winter Park, FL 32789

Dear Mr. Thomas:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated December 22, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Drone Services Orlando, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an 

amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from John J. Jones Investments, Inc. to

Drone Services Orlando, LLC.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 16134

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 
2

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Drone Services Orlando, LLC is hereafter referred to as the 

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 16134 remain in 

effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) annually hosts BARDA Industry Day (BID), a two-day conference with industry and our government partners to share BARDA's goals and objectives, increase awareness of U.S. government medical countermeasure (MCM) priorities, and facilitate collaboration between public and private sectors within the health security space. This year, BARDA plans to discuss implementation efforts for our                         *2022-2026 Strategic Plan,*                         which focuses on strengthening the health security of the nation, embracing lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, incorporating new avenues of promising research and development, and addressing the imperative for MCMs that are safe, effective, and widely accessible.                    

# DATES:

BID 2023 will be a hybrid event, held from Monday, November 13-Tuesday, November 14, 2023. The meeting will begin each day at 9 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.

# ADDRESSES:

                        This meeting is open to the public. Register here:                         *https://medicalcountermeasures.gov/​barda/​barda-industry-day-2023/​.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ezinne N. Ebi, Biomedical Advanced Research & Development Authority (BARDA),                         *ezinne.ebi@hhs.gov,*                         (202) 989-5539.                    

Dawn O'Connell,

Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response.

[FR Doc. 2023-22539 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-37-P
>>> "Baldi, Sara Marie" <SaraMarie.Baldi@genon.com> 12/7/2010 2:45 PM >>> 

Good afternoon, Ron.

Pursuant to our conversations and upon reconsideration, there is no need to designate the FGD WWTP

analytical data and other information associated with the FGD WWTP’s sampling events as “Confidential 

Business Information” or “CBI”. However, per the form that ERG signed at the facility, the pictures that 

have been taken are to be used for “aiding (EPA & ERG) in performing work at RRI Energy and are not to 

be used in any publication, film, technical paper, advertisement, or similar medium.” Consequently, the 

pictures cannot be used in the public arena.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.

If I don’t talk to you beforehand, have a safe and happy holiday season. 

Sara Marie Baldi

GenOn Energy 

Env Operations & Compliance Group

RRI has merged with Mirant to become GenOn. Please note my new email address: 

SaraMarie.Baldi@genon.com

 

work: 724-597-8633

cell: 724-263-9276

fax: 724-597-8870

Note: This email and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged and confidential information prepared at the request of legal counsel 

and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy or deliver this 

message to anyone. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete 

the original e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. Thank you.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 6, 2013*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical data | Technical Q&AsCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**L.219 Multifamily Residential Mortgages** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address in MC05-5029 in which he requested a forty-five

day stay of all of his cases. The undersigned has therefore postponed consideration of this matter

until the end of the forty-five day period.

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_________________________________ )

RICHARD ROY SCOTT, ) No. C06-0731TSZ

)

Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) ORDER PERMITTING CASE TO PROCEED

)

KING COUNTY, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________ )

This matter comes before the Court on referral from the Honorable Thomas S.

Zilly, presiding judge. On April 5, 2005, the United States District Court judges who sit in

Tacoma entered an order dismissing a number of plaintiff’s causes of action and barring future

litigation unless plaintiff provides a signed affidavit, along with the proposed complaint,

“verifying under penalty of perjury that none of the issues raised in the proposed complaint have

been litigated in the past by the plaintiff.” On May 24, 2006, the Clerk of Court received a

complaint, a cover letter, and a declaration signed by Mr. Scott. Dkt. # 1. These documents are

now before the undersigned for review pursuant to the terms of the bar order.1

 

Plaintiff asserts a § 1983 claim and pendent state tort claims against defendant

Case 2:06-cv-00731-TSZ Document 3 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -2-

King County arising out of the conditions of his confinement in May 2006. The undersigned

finds that the issues raised in the above-captioned matter have not been previously litigated by

plaintiff and may proceed subject to the other requirements imposed by the “Order Adopting

Report and Recommendation,” dated April 5, 2005. 

DATED this 26th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik,

Chief Judge, United States District Court 

Case 2:06-cv-00731-TSZ Document 3 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 65283.

#### Aut Customs Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/18317 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.