alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LUCIANO TONELLI, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C06-698-TSZ-JPD

)

v. )

)

SGT. AUTRY, et al., ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

) SECOND MOTION FOR

) RECONSIDERATION

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

Plaintiff is a Washington state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action

brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court denied plaintiff’s motion for appointment of

counsel on June 5, 2006. (Doc. #5). On June 14, 2006, plaintiff filed a second motion for

appointment of counsel (Doc. #10), which the court construed as a motion for reconsideration of the

Order denying plaintiff’s initial motion for appointment of counsel. So construed, the court denied

the motion on June 29, 2006. (Doc. #12). On July 12, 2006, plaintiff filed a second motion for

reconsideration. (Doc. #14). Having reviewed plaintiff’s second motion for reconsideration, and the

balance of the record, the court does hereby find and ORDER as follows:

(1) Petitioner’s second motion for reconsideration (Doc. #14) is DENIED. Petitioner has

failed to show any manifest error in the prior ruling or present any new facts or legal authority that

warrant reconsidering the motion for appointment of counsel. See Local Rule CR 7(h). As before,

plaintiff has neither demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits nor shown that, in light of the

complexity of the legal issues involved, he is unable to articulate his claims himself. Accordingly,

Case 2:06-cv-00698-TSZ Document 15 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE - 2

plaintiff has not demonstrated that this case involves exceptional circumstances that warrant

appointment of counsel. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986).

(2) Plaintiff is advised that no further motions shall be considered regarding appointment

of counsel. They will not be docketed nor reviewed by the court and the Clerk shall return any such

motions to plaintiff.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable

Thomas S. Zilly.

DATED this 17th day of July, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00698-TSZ Document 15 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 299 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 299

      To authorize testimony and representation in BCCI Holdings 
     (Luxembourg), S.A., et al. v. Abdul Raouf Hasan Khalil, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 14 (legislative day, October 2), 1998

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      To authorize testimony and representation in BCCI Holdings 
     (Luxembourg), S.A., et al. v. Abdul Raouf Hasan Khalil, et al.

Whereas, in the case of BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A., et al. v. Abdul Raouf 
        Hasan Khalil, et al., C.A. No. 95-1252 (JHG), pending in the United 
        States District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiffs have 
        requested testimony from Jack Blum, a former employee on the staff of 
        the Committee on Foreign Relations;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent Members, officers, and employees of the 
        Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 
        relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Jack Blum is authorized to testify in the case of 
BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A., et al. v. Abdul Raouf Hasan Khalil, 
et al., except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Jack Blum in connection with the testimony authorized by section one of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIT 4(k)
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

          The undersigned, the trustees of TARGETS TRUST XVI, desiring to form a
business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. Section 3810,
hereby certify as follows:

          (a) The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the "Trust")
     is "TARGETS TRUST XVI".

          (b) The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which
     has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows:

          Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware
          1201 Market Street
          Wilmington, Delaware  19801

          (c) This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of
     filing.

Dated:  March 10, 2000
                                        /s/ MICHAEL J. DAY
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Michael J. Day, Regular Trustee

                                        /s/ CHARLES W. SCHARF
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Charles W. Scharf, Regular Trustee

                                         /s/ MARK I. KLEINMAN
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Mark I. Kleinman, Regular Trustee

                                     CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE,
                                     as Delaware Trustee


                                     By:  /s/ DENIS KELLY
                                        -----------------------------------
                                     Name:   Denis Kelly
                                     Title:  Assistant Vice President

                                     SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HOLDINGS
                                     INC., as Sponsor

                                     By:  /s/ MICHAEL J. DAY
                                        -----------------------------------
                                     Name:  Michael J. Day
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mohanad Shurrab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interpro Management Corp. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Interpro Management Corp.






Date: July 13, 2009
By:
/s/ Mohanad ShurrabMohanad Shurrab, President, Treasurer and Director
  This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Interpro Management Corp. specifically incorporates it by reference.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 15

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the primary author and

the official home of ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. MCNULTY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the primary

author and the official home of ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’.

Whereas the song ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’ is a humorous and patriotic ditty that dates back to America’s colonial period;

Whereas ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’ was popular from its inception,

spreading throughout New England and the Middle Atlantic States, where it was sung at parades, in taverns,

and beside campfires;

Whereas the British soldiers, known as Redcoats, picked up

the tune at the beginning of the American Revolution as

a means of deriding the rag-tag Continental Army;

Whereas, after the Battle of Lexington, ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’ became an anthem and a source of pride among the rough-
2

•HCON 15 IH

hewn Americans who were taking on the polished British

Redcoats;

Whereas, while the tune of ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’ originated in

Europe as a common air, many claims as to the authorship of the lyrics have been made;

Whereas, despite the other claims, Dr. Richard Shuckburgh,

a British Army surgeon who served on America’s frontier

for most of his adult life, is today generally considered

to be the primary author of the lyrics to ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’; and

Whereas Dr. Shuckburgh is believed to have written almost

all, if not all, of the lyrics for ‘‘Yankee Doodle’’ at Fort

Crailo in the city of Rensselaer, New York, after viewing

the provincial forces gathered there in the 1750s for an

attack on Fort Ticonderoga: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) Dr. Richard Shuckburgh should be recog4 nized and honored as the primary author of ‘‘Yankee

5 Doodle’’; and

6 (2) Fort Crailo in the present-day city of

7 Rensselaer, New York, should be recognized as the

8 ‘‘Home of Yankee Doodle’’.

Æ
No. 66578.

#### Tartaglia Imports *v.*United States,

protests 61/17770, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic camera viewers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65082, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 370A/31 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 370A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6031 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 370A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6031 October 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2017/C 370 A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/324/16 — Investigators (AD 9): Team leaders | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2017/C 370 A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/324/16 — Investigators (AD 9): Team leaders

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Air Tractor Inc. P.O. Box 485 Olney, Texas 76374 940-564-5616 940-564-5612 (Fax) www.airtractor
.com November 18,2016 Neil Rose, Manager AFS-810 Airman Certification and Training Branch FAAIFlight Standards Service 800 Independence Ave. SW 20591
DearMr. Rose, Please reference Exemption No. 5651P, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11498, letter dated October 28, 2016. Air Tractor would like to request additional time to implement the required changes to the FAA approved AT-802/802A Pilot Training Program referenced in Condition and Limitation 2 ofthe letter. Therequired changes to the previously approved training program are significant enough that Air Tractorrequests that the currently approved training program, which was approved on Nov. 12, 2015 be allowed to remain in effect for an additional90 days while the new program is developed. AirTractor will commit to having the revised training program submitted to the AFS-800 officebyMarch 1, 2017 for review and approval.
Please feel free to contact mewith any questions or comments regarding this matter.

Mike Rhodes ChiefTest Pilot AirTractor, Inc. P.O. Box 485 Olney, TX 76374 (940)564-5616 ext. 319 mrhodes@airtractor.com
No. 65302.

#### Guy B. Barham Co. and B. E. Enterprises, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/29245, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
October 14, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Representative Van Hollen’s Staff

FROM: Marc Thomas Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

A conference call was held on October 7, 2010 betw een Representative Ch ris Van Hollen’s staff and EPA to discuss how the proposed rule, “I dentification of Non- Hazardous Secondary

Materials that are Solid Wastes (NHSM),” would characterize various secondary materials, such as scrap plastics and spent solvents. EPA explai ned that the definition of solid waste hinges on whether the material has been discarded and gene rally discussed how the proposed rule identifies which non-hazardous secondary materials are, or are not, solid wastes when burned in

combustion units.

List of Meeting Attendees :

Bill Parsons, Rep. Van Hollen’s Staff Cheryl MacKay, EPA/OCIR Jackie Ashley, EPA/OAR Robin Dunkins, EPA/OAR George Faison, EPA/OSWER Marc Thomas, EPA/OSWER
Exhibit 5

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Mouat, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Baja Mining Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|Date:  March 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert Mouat                     
|                      |  |     |  | Robert Mouat 
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,078
<PP&E>                                           3,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,463
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,157
<SALES>                                         61,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,838
<CGS>                                           27,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,091
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,156
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73<F1><F2>
<FN>
<F1>BASIC EPS BEFORE THE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM WAS $1.05. DILUTED EPS BEFORE THE
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM WAS $0.98.
<F2>EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED INTO THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EPS LINE ITEMS ABOVE
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

WILLIAM GRONBERG

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security

CASE NUMBER: C06-5004RBL

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

 XX Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court grants plaintiff’s counsel’s motion and authorizes an attorney fee of $10,613.39 in

accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, this Court awarded $4,171.38 pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When issuing the § 4065(b) check, the Commissioner

is directed to subtract the amount previously awarded under the EAJA, and to send to Plaintiff’s attorney

$6,442.01. Any amount the Commissioner continues to withhold from past due benefits should then be

release to Plaintiff. 

 November 8, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Date Clerk

 s/Caroline M. Gonzalez 

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-05004-RBL Document 30 Filed 11/08/07 Page 1 of 1
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 319

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the 10th

anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former SovietUnion.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 319

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible

incorporation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and

Lithuania into the former Soviet Union;

Whereas the declaration on May 4, 1990, of the reestablishment of full sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Latvia furthered the disintegration of the former

Soviet Union;
2

•HCON 319 EH

Whereas Latvia since then has successfully built democracy,

passed legislation on human and minority rights that

conform to European and international norms, ensured

the rule of law, developed a free market economy, and

consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free and democratic nations by seeking membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

(NATO); and

Whereas Latvia, as a result of the progress of its political

and economic reforms, has made, and continues to make,

a significant contribution toward the maintenance of

international peace and stability by, among other actions,

its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in

Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates Latvia on the occasion of the

4 10th anniversary of the reestablishment of its inde5 pendence and the role it played in the disintegration

6 of the former Soviet Union; and

7 (2) commends Latvia for its success in imple8 menting political and economic reforms, which may
3

•HCON 319 EH

1 further speed the process of that country’s integra2 tion into European and Western institutions.

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officers of SHINE MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP., a Delaware corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to this Amendment No. 2 to the
      Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31
      2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report")
      that:





(1)
      the
      10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




SHINE
                MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP.Date:
                November 12, 2008By:
            /s/
                David Y. ChenDavid
                Y. ChenChief
                Executive Officer