alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case Wo. 8,276a.

#### LESSER v. SKLARZ.

[Betts, Scr. Bk. 601.]

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Nov. 5, 1859.

Copyright — Translation.

[A translation from the original Hebrew, of the Pentateuch, is subject to copyright.]

This case came up under two forms of action: One for an infringement of a copyright which the plaintiff [Isaac Lesser] claimed to have in a printed book; and, secondly, for an injunction to restrain the defendant [Samuel Sklarz] from printing, publishing, or selling or exposing for sale a piratical edition of the plaintiff’s English translation from the original Hebrew of the five books of Moses and portions of the prophets. It was stated under oath that a Hebrew in the employ of the plaintiff went to the store of the defendant, and saw his wife. She said her husband was not at home, but being told the object of the visit was to procure a cheap English edition, translated, of the five books of Moses, she said her husband had such a cheap translation, and, going to a glass case where Hebrew books were for sale, said she could not find them. The purchaser saying he could not wait, she produced the books, and said her husband charged $6 and $7 for them, according to the style of binding. The witness subsequently went again, and saw the defendant, and from him made a purchase of copies of the books, being a mere fac simile of the plaintiff’s translation. This was the substance of the complaint.

Mr. Cutter for complainant said his client was one of the Hebrew ministers of a large synagogue in Philadelphia, and contended that, as his client had taken out a copyright for his work, this was such an infringement as would justify the court to put a stop to the sale of the printed work of the defendant.

Mr. Joachimson, on the other side, contended that the defendant could not be made amenable for selling or printing or publishing a book which had existed beyond the memory of man. If he could, then the Messrs. Harpers could be enjoined from publishing or selling their translation of the Bible. Such books were not the subject of a copyright law.

Th@ facts in the case were not contested by the counsel on either side; and BETTS, District Judge, after listening patiently to a long argument, granted the injunction, and gave a judgment for the plaintiff.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Lewis, Vice Chairman and Principal Accounting Officer of Boulder Specialty Brands, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Boulder Specialty Brands, Inc.

Dated: March 31, 2006



/s/ James E. LewisJames E. LewisVice Chairman and Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, William R. LaRue, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. [Intentionally omitted];     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                          /s/ William R. LaRue   William R. LaRue   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 10.5.3

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                             SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC.
                 1996 NON-QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


A. The Summit Properties Inc. 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Plan"), as previously amended, is hereby further amended as follows:

         1.  Section 6 is hereby amended by adding the following subsection (f)
at the end thereof:

                  "(f) With the approval of the Compensation Committee, a
         Participant who is an Eligible Employee may fund his cash contributions
         under the Plan through a promissory note made payable to the Company
         pursuant to the Company's loan policy."

B. The effective date of this Second Amendment shall be September 1, 1997.

C. Except as amended herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         391,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               435,331
<PP&E>                                         326,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,118
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 808,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,646,643
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,138
<OTHER-SE>                                   (938,981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   808,265
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,153,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,156,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,158,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,158,161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered May 8 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 00536

- CV

IN RE WILLIAM B. ADAMS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 11

- 08224



### O RDER

Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
CA 16-1

April 7, 2016

TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 

SECTIONS:

Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to 

institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve with total consolidated assets of $10 

billion or less.

SUBJECT: Revised Interagency Examination Procedures for the Flood Disaster 

Protection Act

The Task Force on Consumer Compliance of the Federal Financial Institutions 

Examination Council recently developed the attached interagency examination 

procedures for the Flood Disaster Protection Act (FDPA). These revised procedures 

supersede the FDPA interagency examination procedures transmitted with CA 97-1. 

The attached procedures reflect a July 2015 interagency rulemaking addressing 

force placement of flood insurance, escrow of flood insurance premiums and fees, and 

the exemption to the mandatory purchase of flood insurance requirement for certain 

detached structures. Additionally, these examination procedures also reflect edits to 

clarify requirements and improve readability.
2

If you have any questions, please contact Lanette Meister, Senior Supervisory 

Consumer Financial Services Analyst, at (202) 452-2705, or Amy Henderson, Managing 

Counsel, at (202) 452-3140. In addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s public 

website.1

Sincerely, 

Attachment: Interagency Examination Procedures for the Flood Disaster Protection Act

Supersedes: CA 97-1 “Revised examination procedures which reflect changes in 

Regulation H, the Flood Disaster Protection Act” (June 19, 1997)

 1 See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
Exhibit 99.1

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                    REGARDING ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2005-3
2005-3 Asset-Backed Notes

            I, Kevin Cloyd, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed Executive
Vice President of New Century Mortgage Corporation (the "Company"), and further
certify as follows:

            1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the
Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2005 (the "Servicing Agreement"),
among New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2005-3, as issuer, the Company, as
master servicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

            2. I have reviewed the activities of the Company during the
preceding year and the Company's performance under the Servicing Agreement and
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout the year.

            Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set
forth in the Servicing Agreement.


Dated: March 15, 2006
<PAGE>

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 15, 2006.

                                             By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name:  Kevin Cloyd
                                             Title: Executive Vice President

            I, Joseph Tortorelli, an Assistant Secretary of the Company, hereby
certify that Kevin Cloyd is a duly elected, qualified, and acting Executive Vice
President of the Company and that the signature appearing above is his genuine
signature.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 15, 2006.

                                             By: /s/Joseph Tortorelli
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name:  Joseph Tortorelli
                                             Title: Assistant Secretary
#### George A. Whipple, Appellant, vs. James Renton, Appellee. Interference.

Interference — appeal by patentee dismissed. — An appeal in an interference by a patentee from a decision of the Commissioner, not referring or rejecting, but granting, the application, dismissed for want of jurisdiction or authority.

Pomeroy *v.*Connison *[ante,*p. 40) cited and approved.

(Before Morsell, J., District of Columbia,

September, 1854.)

*333
      *J J. Greenough,*for the appellant.

Morsell, J.

On the 23d of December, 1853, James Renton filed an application in the Patent Office for letters-patent for an improvement in furnaces for making iron direct from the ore, which was declared to interfere with a patent granted to the said George A. Whipple on the 10th óf May, 1853 ; and for the trial of the issue so formed the parties were allowed to take their testimony, which being done, and the said matter fully heard, the Commissioner on the 6th of June, 1854, awarded priority of invention to the said James Renton; from which said decision the said George A. Whipple hath appealed and filed his reasons of appeal.

The Commissioner has laid before me the grounds of his decision in writing, with the original papers and the evidence in the cause; and a time and place having been appointed for the hearing of said appeal, the party appellant by his counsel filed his argument in writing in reply to a motion to dismiss the appeal for the want of jurisdiction made by the counsel for the appellee ; and the said case was thereupon submitted.

This, as before said, is an appeal by a patentee from a decision of the Commissioner, not refusing or rejecting, but granting, the application for letters-patent.

I have carefully examined and considered the argument made in support of the jurisdiction. The point being the same which was decided by Judge Cranch in the year 1842 in the case of Pomeroy *v.*Connison *(ante,*p. 40), on very full consideration, and followed by me since, I feel that I ought to consider the point as settled, and am therefore of opinion that I have no jurisdiction in this case, and order and direct the said appeal to be dismissed ; and the same is hereby so certified by me to the Commissioner, and I shall herewith return the papers to the Patent Office.
Skip to main content

An official website of the United States Government        

        -  Home 
        -  About the FFB 
        -  FFB Reports 
        -  Contact the FFB 

# Welcome to the Federal Financing Bank 

About the FFB

## Reports

Monthly Activity Reports >

Financial Statements >

Annual Reports >

## Congress created the Federal Financing Bank (FFB) in 1973 to help meet the demand for funds through Federal and federally-assisted borrowing programs, and to coordinate such borrowings with overall Federal fiscal and debt management policies. The mission of the FFB is to coordinate these programs with the overall economic and fiscal policies of the Government, to reduce the costs of Federal and federally-assisted borrowings from the public, and to assure that such borrowings are financed in a manner least disruptive of private financial markets and institutions. 

Federal Financing Bank (FFB)

FFB@treasury.gov
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 72208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23059]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12237]


Notice of Renewal of the Charter of the Department of State's 
Advisory Committee on Private International Law

    The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Advisory 
Committee on Private International Law for two more years. Through the 
Committee, the Department of State obtains the views of the public with 
respect to significant private international law issues that arise in 
international organizations of which the United States is a Member 
State, in international bodies in whose work the United States has an 
interest, or in the foreign relations of the United States. The 
Committee is comprised of representatives from other government 
agencies, representatives of national organizations, experts and 
professionals active in the field of international law. Comments should 
be sent to the Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Private 
International Law at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0b0a9aca09394819485ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="19495055596a6d786d7c377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>. Copies of the Charter may be 
obtained by contacting Tricia Smeltzer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#087b656d647c726d7a7c63487b7c697c6d266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6a5bbb3baa2acb3a4a2bd96a5a2b7a2b3f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.or found 
online at https://www.facadatabase.gov/FACA/FACAPublicPage.
    Authority: 41 CFR 102-3.65 and 22 U.S.C. 2651a.

Joseph N. Khawam,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of the 
Legal Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-23059 Filed 10-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES
                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                              Washington, D.C. 20549

                                                     FORM 10-Q/A

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996
OR
[  ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
		OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from 		to 	

Commission file number 0-20654

                           HEALTHTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                Nevada					  36-3797495	
(State or other jurisdiction of		                         (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		                          Identification No.)

                                  1237 South Val Vista Drive
                                       Mesa, Arizona 85204
                         (Address of principal executive offices)

                                           602-396-0660
                (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

	Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports 
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the 
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to 
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  X		No____

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

	Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and 
reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan 
confirmed by a court.
Yes____ 	No____

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
	
	Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
 common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
As of June 30, 1996, Registrant has a total of 4,843,424 common stock and 
3,616,239 class A warrants outstanding.


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be 
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

					HEALTHTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.






		Date:  August 28, 1996		/s/ Gordon L. Hall
                        						Gordon L. Hall
					                        	Chairman of the Board of Directors


		Date:  August 28, 1996		/s/ Timothy Williams
                        						Timothy Williams
                          				President and Director 


		Date: August 28, 1996		/s/ Perry Dusch
                       						Perry Dusch
                        					Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

                                 AMENDMENT NO.2
                                       TO
                             ADFLEX SOLUTIONS, INC.
                           1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

1.   EFFECTIVE DATE.
     
     The Board of Directors of the ADFlex Solutions, Inc. (the "Corporation")
adopted this Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment") to the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan,
as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 28, 1995 (the
"1994 Plan"), pursuant to unanimous consent resolutions as of August__, 1996.

2.   TRANSFERABILITY.  

     Section 10(a) of the 1994 Plan hereby is deleted.

3.   ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN.

     Section 15(a) of the 1994 Plan hereby is amended in its entirety to read
as follow:

          (a) This Plan shall be administered by the Board or by the
          Compensation Committee of the Board, which shall be composed of not
          less than two members of the Board, each of whom shall be a
          "non-employee director" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3. For purposes
          of grants and awards pursuant to, and administration of, this Plan,
          the terms "Committee" and "Board" are used interchangeably.

     Section 15(d) of the 1994 Plan hereby is deleted.

4.   AMENDMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS.

     Section 17(d)(ii) and Section 17(e) of the 1994 Plan hereby are deleted.

5.   NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS AUTOMATIC STOCK OPTION GRANTS.

     Section 21(b) and Section 21(i) of the 1994 Plan hereby are deleted.

6.   EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.

     Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment, all of the
terms and conditions of the 1994 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

                                       1