alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sepracor Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, AdrianAdams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Date: November 8, 2007 |     |                                    |
|-----------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        |     | /s/ ADRIAN ADAMS                        |
|                        |     | Adrian Adams                            |
|                        | * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Sepracor Inc. and will beretained by Sepracor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
(Reap. Dec. 11084)

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 13813.

(Decided October 19,1965)

*Sharp, Solter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the time relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As *627to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
OFFICE OF TNE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Bon. Charln~R. Vmtln Caunt7 Auaitat RaBarrimn

count7 Uantmll, TomROIL charlo. 11. E.rtln, P.g. 8

officers 8hal.l reonivo l .Id r.larf In lieu of .ll other fee., ooani~ion8 01 oompc~atIon rhloh **they** would oth.rwI.obe l tho rlred ta ntdn; provided. hover. **that** the l8ae88 or .nU .ol;lr:ator a? t8xes ehall oontinue to aolIeat and retain for the banerlt of the core’ Ealary l%nd or f **unde** bereina~re&ed 1 fro8 end oo~r~llfislonn whi h h dsr law to oollbatt l ml1

oivI1 ease8 **by** tha 6trte but all suoh so8tr 80 pald 8h.11 ba .ooounted ior by tha ot?iosre oolleatln& the .~ae, .s the7 .r8 xwqulmd under the ecmel rovI8lo~ of thI8 Aot to 8ooount tar toss, 8eIon8 partiM." and oorto .f3l&.tsbfraz prirats

(uaaor.eorin(l

our.)
**Tin uQderl7ing**  purp0.e o$ the offIosr.' &lAr7 bw, Artiole 39160, .qme, I. **that** the foe. and eosmd..Ion., othenI.a m.alv.blo by the oeuat **into** and nab up the OS?Io.r.'8.Ia offioen, rhould b8 p.id zy FuaQ. Fhl. f.wh.wn **by** S.otIon S, above quated, and by Ssotion S thortot, whloh prwiU1~8 In pert 88 foll0~~8:

*Sea. S. Xt ahall be the dut7 oi all offlaors to ohnrge and aollwt In the maaner l utho rlaod

by lea+ all i.e. .nd .omaI..Ion. rNoh .r8 petitted by law fo bo assassed md oolleoted tar all 

### 0rfioiiii ranice 

### pm0n8ea by them. As aaU when euoh fee8 alo eoll.etad they .hell br Qspo.ItodIn the Offleer.’ Wary Fund, or fund. proviaetl In thla A.&..* Aooord1ngly, you are 

### ~sptruuy advleed that the oounty ahaul pay to the aoe~eor-oolleotor the fore otherWl8e r@osIvahlrI **by hh**  **frm the**  **OOUnty,** whsreupon the ..8e88oroolleetor should ileposlt 88~0 in the Offloors*6alkry Fun4 In the 8.m. manner a. f.s. naeived h7 him frtnu the **Stete.**Hon. Clmrloe R, Xartln, Page S

W8 trust this lmrere your Inquiry eatlafaotorily and we ronala, Verytruly 7oura ATTmmY f3mlaAs OFTEXAS

m

ATTORNEY

GEhXRAL

OBTEXAS

APPROYED
**0WNt0~** 

# 0

**COMM~TTEL** ..$$gg
Before the Second Division,

October 23, 1959

No. 63456.

protests 58/11209 and 58/19348 (New York).

#### Dynamo Tulle Imp. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*378Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk malines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C.D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Seaspan Corporation (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Form 20-F), I, Gerry Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 7, 2008



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Gerry Wang                                       
|    |  | Gerry Wang                                           
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

STAY; GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO

DISMISS § 2254 PETITION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

RICHARD L. CARMICHAEL,

Petitioner,

v.

E. K. MCDANIEL,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-2076-RSM

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR STAY; GRANTING

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO

DISMISS § 2254 PETITION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s motion for stay, or in the alternative, for dismissal

without prejudice of his § 2254 petition, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary

Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the remaining record,

does hereby ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, and notes his continuing

objection to the Court’s construing this challenge as appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which

he expresses in his Objections;

(2) Petitioner’s motion for a stay (Dkt. #9) is DENIED;

(3) Petitioner’s request, in the alternative, for dismissal without prejudice, is 

Case 2:05-cv-02076-RSM Document 12 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

STAY; GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO

DISMISS § 2254 PETITION

PAGE -2

GRANTED. Petitioner’s § 2254 petition and this action are DISMISSED without

prejudice; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to petitioner and to Judge

Theiler.

DATED this 19th day of May, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-02076-RSM Document 12 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2
1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MA STERS

Filed: November 28, 2017

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

LINDA BAKER, as the court

- appointed *

guardian and conservator for *

JAMES BAKER, *

*

Petitioner, * No. 17

- 1 085 V

*

v. * Special Master Gowen

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Dismissal; Order Concluding Proceedings

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Under Vaccine Rule 21(a); Influenza (“Flu”)

* Vaccination; Prurigo Nodularis.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mark Sadaka , Mark T. Sadaka LLC, Englewood, NJ, for petitioner.

Daniel Principato , United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On August 9, 2017, Linda Baker (“petitioner”), as the court

- appointed guardian and

conservator for James Baker, filed a petition for compensation in the National Vaccine Inju ry

Compensation Program. 2 Petitioner alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination

received on October 16, 2014, James Baker developed prurigo nod ularis. Petition (ECF No. 1).

On November 22, 2017, petitioner filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Vaccine Rule

21(a). Notic e (ECF No. 10).

1 P ursuant to the E

- Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), b ecause this order concluding

proceedings contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the

United States Court of Federal Claims. The court’s website is at

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the order is po sted on the court’s website, each party has

14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret

or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or

similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule

18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither

party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the order will be posted on the court’s website without any

changes. Id.

2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa

- 10 et seq

. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the

Act.2

I. DISCUSSION

Under Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(A), petitioner may voluntarily dismiss the petition without

order of the special master or the court by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service

of respondent’s report.

Under Vacc ine Rule 21(a)(3), the result of this voluntary dismissal is an Order

Concluding Proceedings. No judgment will enter pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11, for purposes of

42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 21(a).

II. CONCLUSION

This petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed

that judgment shall not enter, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 21(a). The Clerk of the Court is

directed to remove this case from my docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas L. Gowen

Thomas L. Gowen

Special Master
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 225

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States has an obligation

to serve its veterans’ health needs, that future congressional budget

resolutions should reflect the ongoing need of the Nation’s veterans,

and that the Committees on Appropriations should provide the financial

resources needed by the Veterans Health Administration to meet future

demands.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon (for herself, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. HOLT, Mr. EVANS,

Mr. FILNER, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. PETERSON of

Minnesota, Mr. REYES, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. HILL of Indiana, Mr. BOYD,

Mr. KIND, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. BENTSEN,

Mr. MOORE, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr.

FORBES, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. INSLEE,

Mr. WEYGAND, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr.

SHERMAN, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Ms. CARSON, Mr. WALDEN, and

Mr. ABERCROMBIE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States

has an obligation to serve its veterans’ health needs,

that future congressional budget resolutions should reflect the ongoing need of the Nation’s veterans, and

that the Committees on Appropriations should provide

the financial resources needed by the Veterans Health

Administration to meet future demands.
2

•HCON 225 IH

Whereas the Veterans Health Administration expects to increase its fiscal year 2000 workload, as reflected in the

number of patients served, some 24 percent over fiscal

year 1996 levels;

Whereas the Veterans Health Administration budget has

been increased by nearly 10 percent over 1997 levels for

fiscal year 2000;

Whereas maintaining this increase in future Veterans Health

Administration budgets will help avoid delayed or inadequate delivery of both health care and health services to

sick and disabled veterans;

Whereas accessible high-quality health care, long-term care,

and mental health care are of great importance to the

Nation’s veterans; and

Whereas many veterans have incurred diseases or disabilities

during their service for the Nation and are in need of

regular medical attention: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States has a responsibility to

4 serve its veterans;

5 (2) future congressional budget resolutions and

6 laws making appropriations for the Veterans Health

7 Administration should reflect the ongoing need for

8 quality veterans health care; and

9 (3) the congressional committees of jurisdic10 tions should act in accordance with this resolution.

Æ
CoStar Group, Inc. v. Commercial Investment MLS Doc. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
EXHIBIT 31.1

                             FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION

      I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
2005, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by that annual report,
of the trust (the "Trust") created pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated June 28, 2005 (the "P&S Agreement") among Residential Asset
Mortgage Products, Inc. (the "Company"), GMAC Mortgage Corporation (the
"Servicer") and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (the "Trustee");

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by that annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be
provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the P&S Agreement is included in
these reports;

      4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer
under the P&S Agreement and based upon my knowledge and the review required
under the P&S Agreement, and, except as disclosed in the report, the Servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the P&S Agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant , after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, or
similar procedure, as set forth in the P&S Agreement, that is included in these
reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.

Date:   March 28, 2006


        /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        ----------------------------
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Executive Vice President
No. 69316.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., and Traveler Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/10309 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0009

CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DELORISANN M. GIBSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 21, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 14 2021

06/14/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

EURO CLASSICS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXEL GLOBAL LOGISTICS,

Defendant.

 CASE NO. C06-843JLR 

 ORDER

 

Previously, the court dismissed all claims in this case without prejudice based on

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order directing the parties to obtain local counsel

(Dkt. # 22). In doing so, the court inadvertently dismissed Defendant’s counterclaim, which

Defendant timely brought to the court’s attention. The court hereby amends its prior order to

preserve Defendant’s counterclaim and directs the clerk to reopen the case. The court’s

decision to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims remains unchanged. 

The court is in receipt of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment or default

judgment (Dkt. # 23). It does not appear that Defendant properly served Plaintiff with its

motion. Email notification to Plaintiff’s out-of-state counsel, who is not registered on

CM/ECF, does not suffice. See W.D. Wash. Electronic Filing Procedures Manual,

Case 2:06-cv-00843-JLR Document 25 Filed 12/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

Section III.D. (“If the recipient is not a registered participant in ECF, service of the underlying

document must be made by the filer in paper form according to the Federal Rules.”). To

ensure notice, the court orders Defendant to serve its motion on both Plaintiff’s counsel in

New Jersey as well as on Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. In the meantime, the court

STRIKES the motion without prejudice to Defendant refiling it once it has properly served

Plaintiff.

 Lastly, if Defendant wishes to move for default judgment in the future, it must comply

with Local Rules W.D. Wash CR 55 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), (b), which require an entry of

default by the clerk prior to an award of default judgment. 

Dated this 11th day of December, 2006.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00843-JLR Document 25 Filed 12/11/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 61114.

protests 273160-K, etc. (New York).

#### Karavan Trading Co. and H. W. Robinson Air Frt. Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-27
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-27


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Exhibit 23.1

November 14, 2011



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the incorporation and use in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K ) of Vital Products Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2011 of our
audit report, dated November 11, 2011, relating to the accompanying audited
financial statements (and related statements included there in) as of
July 31, 2010 which appears in the Annual Report.



De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC

/s/ De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC
Henderson, NV
November 14, 2011
<PAGE>