Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

National Credit Union Administration

State Financial Regulators

Interagency Examiner Guidance

for Assessing Safety and Soundness Considering the Effect of the COVID-19

Pandemic on Institutions

June 2020

Page 1

Purpose

The federal financial institution regulatory agencies [Footnote 1

- The federal financial institution regulatory agencies are the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the National

Credit Union Administration (NCUA) (collectively, the agencies). End of Footnote 1.]

in conjunction with the state bank and credit

union regulators are jointly issuing this examiner guidance to outline the supervisory principles for

assessing the safety and soundness of institutions [Footnote 2

- Institutions include insured depository institutions, U.S. operations of foreign banking organizations (FBOs), bank

holding companies,savings and loan holding companies, federally insured credit unions, and Edge Act corporations. End of Footnote 2.]

given the ongoing impact of the COVID-19

pandemic. [Footnote 3

- See Proclamation 9994, Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease COVID-19

Outbreak, 85 FR 15337 (March 18, 2020) End of Footnote 3.]

In assessing an institution under the principlesin this document, examiners will

consider the institution's asset size, complexity, and risk profile, as well as the industry and

business focus of its customers.

Examiners will consider the unique, evolving, and potentially long-term nature of the issues

confronting institutions and exercise appropriate flexibility in their supervisory response. Stresses

caused by COVID-19 can adversely impact an institution's financial condition and operational

capabilities, even when institution management has appropriate governance and risk management

systems in place to identify, monitor, and control risk. Examiners will continue to assess

institutions in accordance with existing agency policies and procedures and may provide

supervisory feedback, or downgrade an institution's composite or component ratings, when 

conditions have deteriorated. In conducting their supervisory assessment, examiners will consider

whether institution management has managed risk appropriately, including taking appropriate

actions in response to stresses caused by COVID-19 impacts.

The agencies have issued numerous statements related to supervisory policy since the declaration

of the national emergency. Appropriate actions taken by institutions in good faith reliance on such

statements, within applicable timeframes described in such statements, will not be subject to

criticism or other supervisory action.
Page 2

Background

The adverse economic effects of the pandemic will likely have a significant impact on the business

activities of institutions and their customers for an extended period. The containment measures

adopted in response to public health concerns resulted in restrictions on the physical movement of

institutions' personnel and those of their service providers and customers, which, in turn, have

created significant operational challenges. In addition, government programs and policies intended

to provide support and assistance to those affected by the pandemic have impacted institutions'

economic and regulatory landscape. The overall impact of, and recovery from, the pandemic could

be uneven and highly localized across the country.

Some institutions may face extensive asset quality issues caused by business failures, the loss of

jobs, interruptions of borrowers' income streams, increases in borrowers' operating costs, and 

volatile or declining collateral values. Many institutions have also materially modified operational

processes to continue providing products and services while adhering to stay-at-home and social 

distancing guidelines. These modifications, including extensive use of work-at-home strategies

and the need to quickly implement various stimulus programs, may have stressed change

management processes. Operational, compliance, and cyber risks may increase for many

institutions, and internal controls may need to evolve as risks and operations change.

Overall Supervisory Assessment

It is essential that examiners maintain a clear understanding of the financial condition of each

institution and the effectiveness of each institution's risk assessment and response to the economic

changes. To promote consistency and transparency across the agencies, examiners will continue to

assign supervisory ratings in accordance with the applicable rating system, including the Uniform

Financial Institutions Rating System, commonly referred to as the CAMELS rating [Footnote 4

- See the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council's (FFIEC's) Uniform Financial Institutions Rating

System, FR 67021 (December 19, 1996). NCUA examiners will refer to NCUA Letterto Credit Unions 07-CU-12,

CAMEL Rating System when assigning the CAMEL ratings (December 2007). End of Footnote 4.]

and the

interagency Rating System for U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banking Organizations,

commonly referred to as the ROCA rating. [Footnote 5

- See the Board's Supervision and Regulation Letter (SR Letter) Enhancements to the Interagency Program for

Supervising the U.S. Operations ofForeign Banking Organizations SR 00-14 (October 23, 2000); the OCC

Comptroller's Handbook, Bank Supervision Process, “ROCA Rating System”; and the FDIC's Risk Management

Manual ofExamination Policies Section 11.1 -International Banking. End of Footnote 5.]

Similarly, Federal Reserve examiners will apply the

principles outlined in this letter in assigning supervisory ratings to bank holding companies, U.S.

intermediate holding companies, and savings and loan holding companies using the RFI/C(D)

rating system or LFI rating system, [Footnote 6

- See Board's SR Letter 19-4/CA Letter 19-3 Supervisory Rating System for Holding Companies with Total

Consolidated Assets Less Than $100 Billion, and SR Letter 19-3/CA Letter 19-2 Large Financial Institution (LFI)

Rating System. End 6.] of Footnote 

as applicable, and to the U.S. operations of foreign banking

organizations. [Footnote 7

- Federal Reserve examiners should refer to Footnote 5. End of Footnote 7.]

In applying the principles in this document, examiners will consider the

institution's asset size, complexity, and risk profile as well as the industry and business focus of its
Page 3

customers.

Examiners should assess the reasonableness of management's actions in response to the pandemic

given the institution's business strategy and operational capacity in the distressed economic and 

business environment in which the institution operates. When assigning the composite and

component ratings, examiners will review management's assessment of risks presented by the

pandemic, considering the institution'ssize, complexity, and risk profile. When assessing

management, examiners will consider management's effectiveness in responding to the changes in

the institution's business markets and whether the institution has addressed these issues in its 

longer-term business strategy.

An examiner's assessment may result in downgrading component or composite ratings for some

institutions. In considering the supervisory response for institutions accorded a lower rating,

examiners will give appropriate recognition to the extent to which weaknesses are caused by 

external economic problems related to the pandemic versus risk management and governance

issues. Examiners will also consider the extent to which institutions have taken actions to work

prudently with borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual payment obligations

because of the effects of the pandemic.

When considering whether to take a formal or informal enforcement action in response to issues 

related to the pandemic, the agencies will consider whether an institution's management has

appropriately planned for financial resiliency and continuity of operations; implemented prudent

policies; and is pursuing realistic resolution of the issues confronting the institution. In instances

where a formal or informal supervisory action is warranted, the agencies will tailor their response

to the institution's specific issues and the willingness and ability of institution management to

resolve the issues.

Effectiveness of Institution's Assessment of Risk

Examiners should evaluate management's initial and ongoing assessment of the risk that the

pandemic presents to the institution. [Footnote 8

- See the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness (Interagency Safety and Soundness

Standards), which indicate that an institution should have an effective risk assessment process as part ofits internal

controls and information systems that is appropriate to the size ofthe institution and the nature, scope and risk ofits

activities. OCC: 12 CFR Part 30, Appendix A; Board: 12 CFR Part 208, Appendix D-1; and FDIC: 12 CFR Part 364,

Appendix A. See also the Interagency Guidance on Credit Risk Review Systems. NCUA examiners should also refer

to Supervisory Letter (SL) 13-12 on Enterprise Risk Management SL 13-12, shared with federally insured credit

unions through Letter to Credit Unions 13-CU-12. End of Footnote 8.]

Examiners should determine whether management's

assessment of credit risk reasonably reflects the institution's asset quality, given the prevailing 

economic conditions in its business markets. In addition to determining the effect on asset quality,

examiners should assess management's understanding of the pandemic's effects on the institution's

earnings prospects and capital adequacy, as well as its effect on funding, liquidity, operations, and

sensitivity to market risk. The risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as impacts

of policy responses, can be challenging to assess in real time. Examiners will assess an

institution's risk identification and reporting processes given the level of information available and 

stage of local economic recovery.
Page 4

Examiners should determine whether an institution's assessment of risk is sufficient in scope and

content. In reviewing the assessments, examiners should recognize that the issues confronting

institutions are complex, evolving, and may involve protracted resolution. Examiners also will be

mindful that the localized impact of the pandemic may be materially different from regional or

national impacts. The examination scope may need to be adjusted depending on the quality and

thoroughness of management's assessment of risk. The quality of an institution's risk assessments

will be considered, as appropriate, in the examiner's assessment of supervisory ratings.

CAMELS or ROCA Component Ratings

When assessing the component ratings for CAMELS or ROCA, or analogous component ratings

for holding companies, examiners will consider the following:

Capital Adequacy [Footnote 9

- Branches and agencies ofFBOs do not maintain regulatory capital separate from theirforeign parent organizations.

Federal branches and agencies of FBOs are instead required to maintain capital equivalency deposits as set forth in 12

CFR 28.15, and state-licensed branches and agencies may be subject to similar requirements through their respective

state supervisors. End of Footnote 9.]

Institutions may experience cash flow decreases, asset losses, operational losses, extraordinary

expenses, unexpected deposit growth or declines, and contingent liabilities as a result of the

pandemic. The agencies have encouraged institutions to use their capital buffers to promote

lending activities and other financial intermediation activities in a safe and sound manner. [Footnote 10

- See Regulatory Capital Rule: Eligible Retained Income. OCC 12 CFR Part 3; Board 12 CFR Part 217; and FDIC 12

CFR Part 324. End of Footnote 10.]

The

agencies recognize institutions may experience significant temporary balance sheet growth due to

increased lending, unusually large deposit inflows, or inflows from various government programs.

Such growth may result in a temporary decline in institutions' regulatory capital ratios.

Examiners will evaluate capital relative to the nature and extent of the institution's risks. When

evaluating the capital component, examiners will consider the institution's capital planning efforts.

Examiners will evaluate the institution's capital projections and whether institution management

appropriately assesses the institution's capital needs and vulnerabilities related to the pandemic and

consistent with the institution's risks. If an institution's risk profile is not supported appropriately

by its capital levels, examiners should determine whether management has a satisfactory plan to

maintain capital adequacy and, if needed, build capital. Examiners should discuss with

management the institution's plans for ensuring capital adequacy. In assessing capital adequacy,

examiners will consider the institution's regulatory capital ratios, capital planning and distribution

plans, risk management practices, and whether an institution maintains a fundamentally sound

financial condition.
Page 5

Asset Quality

Examination scopes may need to be adjusted to reflect the significance of affected loan and

investment portfolios. Examiners will continue to assess credits in line with the interagency credit

classification standards, [Footnote 11

- Agency examiners should refer to the Uniform Agreement on the Classification and Appraisal of Securities Held by

Depository Institutions (October 2013). Federal Reserve examiners should also refer to the Commercial Bank

Examination Manual, sections 2060.1, Classification ofCredits and 2130.1, Consumer Credit. NCUA examiners

should refer to the CreditRiskRating Systems content in the NCUA Examiner's Guide. End of Footnote 11.]

while recognizing the constraints posed by the pandemic. For instance,

supporting file documentation may be limited due to unusual circumstances caused by the

pandemic. When assessing asset quality, examiners should consider whether management has

been able to identify loans and investments substantially affected by the pandemic and recognize

any deterioration in a timely manner, including any potentialloss exposure.

Examiners will assess management's ability to implement prudent credit modifications and

underwriting, maintain appropriate loan risk ratings, designate appropriate accrual status on 

affected loans, and provide for an appropriate Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) or

Allowances for Credit Losses (ACLs), as applicable. In making these assessments, examiners will

give consideration to the items below.

Classification of Credits. The assessment of each loan should be based on the fundamental

characteristics affecting the collectability of that particular credit, while acknowledging that

supporting documentation may be limited and cash flow projections may be highly uncertain.

Where this uncertainty exists, examiners will review management's assessment of the borrower's

repayment ability and financial condition as well as the institution's collateral protection.

Examiners will not subject a renewed, extended, or modified loan to adverse classification solely 

because the value of the underlying collateral has declined to an amount that is less than the loan

balance, provided that the borrower has ability to repay its debts according to reasonable modified

terms.

Examiners should apply appropriate credit classification and charge-offstandards in cases where

the information indicates a loan will not be repaid under reasonable terms. Examiners should also

assessthe reasonableness of management's plans for workouts and pursuing foreclosure of

collateral on nonperforming assets.

Credit Risk Review. Examiners will recognize that the rapidly changing environment and limited

operational capacity may temporarily affect the institution's ability to meet normal expectations of

loan review (e.g. schedule or scope of reviews). Examiners will assess the institution's support for

any delays or reductions in scope of credit risk reviews and consider management's plan to

complete appropriate reviews within a reasonable amount of time.

New Loans. Examiners will assess the appropriateness of the institution's underwriting standards.

Examiners should assess underwriting by reviewing a sample of loans originated during or after the

pandemic, or by reviewing the institution's reports, as appropriate. There may be legitimate

reasons why management may have eased underwriting standards during or after the pandemic to

address the needs of the institution's customer base. Institutions were encouraged by regulators to

work with their borrowers throughout the crisis. Management may need to rely more heavily on
Page 6

pro forma financial information from borrowers in making underwriting decisions. Examiners

should review management's analysis of borrower projections given the local economic conditions

during the recovery. In addition, management may have changed the institution's business strategy

to focus on new lines of business or expand into new markets. If the institution's business strategy

changed, examiners should consider whether the institution has sufficient controls and expertise for 

the new or expanded activities.

Paycheck Protection Program. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES

Act) provided relief to small businesses through loan programs administered by the Small Business

Administration (SBA), with the backing of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, including the

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). [Footnote 12

- See SBA's Paycheck Protection Program Interim Final Rule 13 CFR Part 120 (April 2, 2020) End of Footnote 12.]

The agencies view the PPP as an important program to help

institutions continue to lend to customers in need, without exposing the institution to credit risk, so

long as the institution follows SBA's program guidelines. Moreover, in assessing an institution's

safety and soundness, examiners will not criticize institutions that participate in the PPP in

accordance with SBA program guidelines. The agencies have been supportive of institutionsthat

elected to participate in the PPP and use the Federal Reserve's PPP Liquidity Facility [Footnote 13

- See Federal Reserve's Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (PPPLF). End of Footnote 13.]

to fund PPP

loans. [Footnote 14

- The FDIC, Federal Reserve and OCC issued the Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility and Paycheck

Interim Final Rule (April 13, 2020) and the PPPLF/PPP Interim Final Rule Correction (April 23, 2020) to modify the

agencies' capital rules to neutralize the regulatory capital effects of participating in the Federal Reserve's PPPLF.

Consistent with the agencies' current capital rules and the CARES Act requirements, the interim final rule also clarifies

that a zero percent risk weight applies to loans covered by the PPP for capital purposes. See OCC 12 CFR Part 3,

Board 12 CFR Part 217, and FDIC 12 CFR Part 324. The NCUA issued an interim final rule to provide consistent

capital treatment for credit unions participating in the PPPLF and codify the CARES Act requirement that PPP loans

are risk weighted at zero percent for purposes of risk-based net worth. See 85 FR 23212. End of Footnote 14.]

Credit Modifications. The agencies have encouraged institutions to work prudently with

borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual payment obligations because of the

effects of the pandemic. [Footnote 15

- See Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers

Affected by the Coronavirus (Revised) (Revised Interagency Statement). (April 7, 2020) End of Footnote 15.]

Specifically, the agencies have stated that they view loan modification

programs as positive actions that can mitigate adverse effects on borrowers due to the pandemic.

Examiners should assess the appropriateness of an institution's policies and procedures for credit

renewals, extensions, or modifications. Examiners will not criticize institutions for working with

borrowers as part of a risk mitigation strategy intended to improve existing loans, even if the

restructured loans have or develop weaknesses that ultimately result in adverse credit classification.

In assessing an institution'ssafety and soundness, examiners will not criticize management for 

engaging in prudent loan modifications and working with borrowers in a safe and sound manner.

In assessing an institution'sloan modification practices, examiners will review loan modifications

to evaluate whether management is applying appropriate loan risk grades and making appropriate

accrual status decisions on loans affected by the pandemic. Examiners will exercise judgment in

reviewing loan modifications and not automatically adversely risk rate credits that were modified.
Page 7

When evaluating loan modification practices, examiners will consider the CARES Act and Revised

Interagency Statement. Among other things, the CARES Act provides institutions the option to

temporarily suspend certain requirements under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

(GAAP) related to troubled debt restructurings for a limited period of time to account for the

effects of the pandemic. [Footnote 16

- See Section 4013 the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Pub. L. 116-136. End of Footnote 16.]

The Revised Interagency Statement addresses accounting and reporting

considerations for loan modifications eligible under the CARES Act and for those that are not

eligible, or where the institution elects not to apply the relief provided under the CARES Act.

Nonaccrual. Institutions may allow borrowers affected by the pandemic to defer payment of

principal, interest, or both for a reasonable period with the expectation that the borrower will

resume payments in the future. The Revised Interagency Statement indicates that during the shortterm arrangements, these loans generally should not be reported as nonaccrual. Examiners should

confirm that institutions continue to follow applicable regulatory reporting instructions, as well as

the institutions' internal accounting policies, when reporting nonaccrual assets in regulatory

reports. As information becomes available indicating repayment of a specific loan or accrued

interest is in doubt, examiners should review institution practices against appropriate charge-off

guidance regarding accrued interest and principal.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) or Allowances for Credit Losses (ACLs). [Footnote 17

- Maintenance of an ALLL or ACLs, as applicable, is not required for branches or agencies of FBOs. End of Footnote 17.]

Examiners should review an institution's methodology for calculating the ALLL or ACLs, as

applicable. [Footnote 18

- See Interagency Policy Statement on Allowances for Credit Losses (May 8, 2020) and Interagency Policy Statement

on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (2006). End of Footnote 18.]

In assessing whether the ALLL or ACLs are appropriate, examiners will assess

whether management has considered relevant available information about the collectability of the

institution's loan portfolio, along with any changes to the institution's lending practices and

economic conditions as a result of the pandemic. Examiners should evaluate how an institution

considered the effect of the pandemic in its ALLL or ACLs estimation process, as applicable, and

whether the resulting estimates are in conformity with GAAP and regulatory reporting

requirements. Additionally, examiners will assess management's process for updating estimates of

loan losses in the ALLL or ACLs, as applicable, as the institution obtains additional information.

An institution may have difficulty in accurately determining the collectability of certain loans

impacted by the pandemic. Therefore, examiners should understand that management may need to

consider qualitative adjustments to credit loss estimates for information not already captured in the

loss estimation process. These qualitative factor adjustments may increase or decrease

management's estimate of credit losses. Examiners will recognize that management may need

more time to determine the effect of the pandemic on some borrowers' ability to pay and assess the

value of underlying collateral. Examiners should determine whether management has maintained

the ALLL or ACLs, as applicable, at an appropriate level within a range of loss estimates even

when loan-specific information is not yet available.
Page 8

Obligations of Taxing Authorities. Examiners should confirm that institutions monitor their risk

exposures in municipal bonds to assess whether those bonds continue to be the credit equivalent of

an investment grade security and are appropriately classified, consistent with the interagency credit

classification standards. [Footnote 19

- See Footnote 11. End of Footnote 19.]

Many public obligors and issuers have insurance or have access to debt

payment and other reserve funds that help ensure the full and timely repayment of principal and

interest for the projected life of the asset or exposure. However, examiners should confirm that

management is using relevant information to conduct credit risk assessmentsthat are timely,

accurate, and consistent with internal policies, regulatory requirements, and accounting standards.

Examiners should review the institution's loan and investment portfolios to assess credit that has

been extended to taxing authorities. For example, communities may be heavily dependent on local

sales, hotel, property, and income tax revenues. These sources of revenue have fallen sharply with

containment measures, and the ultimate collection of such loans and investments under reasonable

terms may be adversely affected. Some loans and bonds may also be tied to limited purpose

facilities, such as entertainment or sporting venues, which may not resume operations for an

extended period.

Real Estate Values. The economic impact of the pandemic may result in fluctuationsin real estate

values. For existing and new real estate loans, examiners should assess the institution's policies

and practices for valuing collateral in real estate markets that have experienced a substantial, but

possibly temporary, change in real estate values as a result of pandemic containment measures.

When reviewing an institution's estimates of collateral values, examiners should ascertain whether

the values are based on assumptions that are prudent and realistic.

Appraisal andEvaluation Delays. The agencies have temporarily allowed supervised financial

institutions to defer obtaining an appraisal or evaluation for up to 120 days after the closing of

residential and commercial real estate loans (other than loans for acquisition, development, and

construction ofreal estate). [Footnote 20

- See Interim Final Rule on Real Estate Appraisals (April 14, 2020) End of Footnote 20.]

Examiners should evaluate whether an institution is making best

efforts to obtain a credible valuation ofreal property collateral before the loan closing and how any

backlog of appraisals or evaluations is being addressed. Examiners will also evaluate ifthe

institution's underwriting is consistent with the principles in the agencies' Standards for Safety and

Soundness [Footnote 21

- See Footnote 8. End of Footnote 21.]

and Real Estate Lending Standards [Footnote 22

- OCC: 12 CFR Part 34, Subpart D, Appendix A; Board: 12 CFR Part 208, Subpart E, Appendix C; FDIC: 12 CFR

Part 365, subpart A, Appendix A, and NCUA: 12 CFR Part 722 and §701.21. Institutions should have a program for

establishing the market value ofreal property to comply with these real estate lending standards, which require

institutions to determine the value used in loan-to-value calculations based in part on a value set forth in an appraisal or

an evaluation. End of Footnote 22.]

that focus on the ability of a borrower to repay a

loan and compliance with other relevant laws and regulations.
Page 9

Management

All institutions have been confronted with unprecedented issues, including limitations on 

employees' movements, sudden unanticipated financial impacts to their borrowers, limited physical

access to facilities and other operational challenges. As part of the institution's risk management

assessment, examiners will evaluate institution management based on the reasonableness of

management's response to the pandemic. As additional information becomes available, examiners

expect management to update risk assessments, measure the effectiveness of its response, and

adjust, as necessary.

Examiners will evaluate institution management on its ability to properly identify and prudently

manage risks associated with the pandemic. In doing so, examiners will consider the extraordinary

circumstances surrounding the decisions made to work with borrowers and the large number of

those impacted. Examiners should evaluate the extent to which management factors the results of

these efforts into its longer-term business strategy. Strategies could evolve throughout the local

and national recovery. Institutions may be compelled to reconsider branching, mergers, or other

expansions.

When rating an institution's management, examiners will distinguish between problems caused by 

the institution's management and those caused by external factors beyond management's control.

Provided prudent planning and policies are in place and management is pursuing realistic

resolution of the institution's problems, management of an institution with problems largely related

to the pandemic may warrant a more favorable rating than management of an institution operating

with problems stemming from weak risk management practices that are, or should have been,

substantially within the institution's control.

Operational Risk

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions have quickly adapted certain operational

processes and technology systems to ensure continued delivery of financial services and manage

significant volumes of transactions due to government stimulus programs. Rapid changes in

operational processes and increasing fraud and cyber threats may result in a heightened operational

risk environment. Examiners will review the steps management has taken to assess and implement

effective controls for new and modified operational processes. Examiners will assess actions

management has taken to adapt fraud and cybersecurity controls to manage heightened risks related

to the adjusted operating environment. Examiners will also review how management has assessed

institutions' third parties' controls and service delivery performance capabilities post crisis.

Additionally, examiners will consider the impacts on the control environment from instances of

imprudent cost cutting, insufficient staffing, or delays in implementing needed updates in their

assessment of the institution.

Independent Risk Management and Audit

Examiners will consider how COVID-19-related responses may impact plans and schedules for 

internal audit and independent risk management reviews, including the need to incorporate audits

or reviews of new operational processes and programs. Examiners should review the use of remote

work technologies and teleconferencing systems for work-at-home arrangements, along with the
Page 10

elimination of physical controls present in many office environments. In addition, examiners

should review risk management and audit monitoring of programs to support consumers and

businesses such as PPP, mortgage deferrals, loan forbearance, and other new programs that may

pose credit, legal, and compliance risks if not properly managed.

Earnings [Footnote 23

- The ROCA rating does not contain a component rating for earnings. End of Footnote 23.]

When evaluating earnings, examiners will consider the duration of any reductions to core earnings

caused by the pandemic, including provisions and other expenses that may increase due to asset

quality deterioration. Due to the increased level of loan modifications associated with the

pandemic, levels of deferred interest in relation to total earnings may be elevated. When assessing

earnings, examiners will evaluate how institutions are accounting for and estimating allowances for 

accrued interest from modified loans, as applicable, in accordance with GAAP and Call Report

instructions. Ongoing operational issues, such as increased personnel, legal, IT, and fraud 

expenses may also impact earnings. Examiners should assess the quantity, quality, and trend of

prior earnings as well as the pandemic's influence on earnings prospects. The impact on the

institution's major business lines and significant customers should also be assessed. This

assessment should consider the adequacy and reasonableness of any revisions to the institution's

budget and strategic plan, including projections from participation in government programs related 

to the pandemic.

Liquidity [Footnote 24

- The ROCA rating does not contain a component rating for liquidity. End of Footnote 24.]

There remains considerable uncertainty around the impact of COVID-19 on liquidity profiles.

Examiners will consider the nature and timing of pandemic-related inflows and outflows when

reviewing the adequacy of an institution's liquidity and be cognizant of how management is

employing any influx of liquid resources. Institutions may experience fluctuations in liquidity

resulting from the receipt of customers' Economic Assistance Payments, customers' flight to

quality, participation in various government lending programs or borrowing facilities, or deposit

outflows as depositors, including municipalities, draw on savings or reserves. In addition,

collateral requirements for secured funding sources (such as a line of credit from a Federal Home

Loan Bank) may be temporarily modified. Examiners will evaluate management's ability to

reassess or revise liquidity planning to accommodate changes from the pandemic.

Examiners will not criticize an institution for appropriate use of the discount window or other

Federal Reserve lending programs, or the NCUA's Central Liquidity Facility. Similarly, examiners

will not criticize an institution's prudent use of its liquidity buffer to support economic recovery, in

accordance with the institution's liquidity risk management framework.

Although the ROCA rating does not contain a liquidity component rating, funding, liquidity risk,

and risk management are important factors in the assessment of branches and agencies of FBOs.

Examiners will assess the effect of a pandemic on liquidity as part of the risk management

component of the ROCA rating.
Page 11

Sensitivity to Market Risk [Footnote 25

- The ROCA rating does not contain a component rating for sensitivity to market risk. The NCUA uses the CAMEL

rating system, which does not include the S - sensitivity to market risk. NCUA examiners will continue to consider

sensitivity to market risk and liquidity risk when rating the L component. End of Footnote 25.]

Many institutions may experience temporary shifts in their interest rate risk profiles from changes

in cash flows associated with the pandemic. For example, the amount or timing of cash flows may

be altered by deterioration in loan and bond portfolios or by deferment agreements or programs.

Examiners will recognize that management may need time to fully assess any changes to the

institution's interest rate risk profile and distinguish between permanent structural changes versus

short-term fluctuations during a transitional period. Examiners should determine whether

management has procedures for reviewing and updating its asset and liability management models 

for any unusual fluctuations in deposit balances, adjustmentsto loan payments, changes in interest

rates, and other modificationsto ensure the integrity, accuracy, and reasonableness of the models.

The ROCA rating does not contain a component for market sensitivity. However, examiners

should consider sensitivity in the form of the interest rate risk profile, risk management, and effects

from the pandemic in the assessment of the risk management component of the ROCA rating.

Risk Management of a Branch or Agency of an FBO

A pandemic will likely present challengesto the FBO head office of a branch or agency as well as

local management. When considering risk management of branches and agencies of FBOs,

examiners should focus on the assessment factors outlined in the interagency ROCA rating system,

and consider these factors in the context of the pandemic. Examiners should evaluate the level of

support provided by the home office in restoring operations and the appropriateness of risk

management considering the changing operating environment and economic conditions due to a 

pandemic.