alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64663.

#### Wolf Greenspan & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/1464 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.10





LOGO

Ref.: 1772.19098

September 17, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)



|Re: | Evaluation and Audit of the P&NG Reserves of Penn West Petroleum Ltd.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

(as of
December 31, 2013)

Dear Sirs:

We refer to our
report dated January 30, 2014 entitled Evaluation and Audit of the P&NG Reserves of Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (PennWest) (as of December 31, 2013) (the SprouleReport).

We hereby consent to the inclusion of, or incorporation by reference of and reference to, the Sproule Report in Penn
Wests:

(i) Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013; and

(ii) Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-171675).

(collectively, the Disclosure Documents).

We have read the Disclosure Documents and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived
from the Report, or that is within our knowledge as a result of the services performed by us in connection with the Report.



Sincerely,SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED/s/ Gary R. Finnis, P.Eng. 
Gary R. Finnis, P.Eng.Supervisor, Engineering and Partner






LOGO
#### State of Maine *vs.*Victor Langelier.

Androscoggin.

Opinion, November 3, 1939.

*Edward J. Beauchamp,*County Attorney, *321
      *Armand A. Dufresne, Jr.,*Assistant County Attorney (on the brief) for State.

*Frank T. Powers,*for respondent.

Sitting : Dunn, C. J., Sturgis, Barnes, Thaxter, Hudson, Manser, JJ.

Manser, J.

Indictment for sodomy. Defendant demurred specially on the ground that the indictment did not allege an assault upon the person with whom the offense was committed. Another ground for demurrer was alleged but not pressed, the defense conceding that it was without merit.

The late case of *State*v. *Cyr,*135 Me., 513, 198 A., 743, points out that,

> “By the weight of recent authority apparently supported by better reasoning, sodomy as used in connection with statutes prohibiting the crime against nature is interpreted in its broad sense and held to include all acts of unnatural carnal copulation with mankind or beast.”

It has frequently been held that it is sufficient merely to charge the accused with the commission of the crime of “sodomy,” or of “the crime against nature,” the crime being too well known and too disgusting to require other definition or further details or description. Wharton’s Crim. Pro. 10th ed., V. 2, Secs. 1234 and 1243; 8 R. C. L. 335.

Reason and authority lead to agreement with the opinion of the court in *Glover*v. *State of Indiana,*101 N. E., 629, 45 L. R. A. N. S., 473:

> “By reason of the vile and degrading nature of this crime, it has always been an exception to the strict rules requiring great particularity and nice certainty in criminal pleading, both at common law and where crimes are wholly statutory. It has never been the usual practice to describe the particular manner or the details of the commission of the act, and, where the offense is statutory, a statement of it in the language of the statute, or so plainly that its nature may be easily understood, is all that is required.”

*322As the offense includes all unnatural copulations with mankind or beast, and may be committed without compulsion or force, it is plain that assault is an element only when the offense is perpetrated upon an unwilling human being, and is not an element if the other party consents, or when the offense is committed with a beast. Consent is no defense to a prosecution for sodomy, thus distinguishing the prosecution from one for rape. 58 C. J., pp. 789, 792.

Although forms used in criminal procedure in this state have generally included the allegation of force in an indictment of this character, yet it being unnecessary of proof, an indictment which covers all the material statutory terms is sufficient. *State*v. Bushey, 96 Me., 151, 51 A., 872; *State*v. *Conant,*124 Me., 198, 126 A., 838.

*Exceptions overruled. Indictment adjudged sufficient.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as amended), Robert J.Hanks, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer, and Todd A. Fitzpatrick, VicePresident, of Harbor Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifythat, to the best of their knowledge:

1.     AmendmentNo. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.     Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of May 25,2007.

|          |     | /s/ ROBERT J.  HANKS                           |
|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------|
|          |     | Robert J. Hanks                                |
| * * | * * | *Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer*        |
| * * | * * | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                |
|     |     | /s/ TODD A. FITZPATRICK                        |
|     |     | Todd A. Fitzpatrick                            |
| * * | * * | *Vice President*                               |
| * * | * * | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

This certification accompanies this Annual Report towhich it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theRegistrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         639,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  598,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    228,288
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,507,676
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,660,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,193,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,709,524
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,306,953)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,660,994
<SALES>                                        597,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               597,533
<CGS>                                          528,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,698)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (264,492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73043-73044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-382 and 731-TA-800, 801, and 803 (Fourth 
Review)]


Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From Japan, South Korea, and 
Taiwan Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on stainless 
steel sheet and strip from South Korea and the antidumping duty orders 
on stainless steel sheet and strip from Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan 
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioners Jason E. Kearns and Randolph J. Stayin not 
participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on September 1, 2022 (87 FR 
53780) and determined on December 5, 2022, that it would conduct full 
reviews (87 FR 78994, December 5, 2022). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given

[[Page 73044]]

by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register on March 7, 2023 (88 FR 15456). The 
Commission conducted its hearing on August 17, 2023. All persons who 
requested the opportunity were permitted to participate.
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on October 18, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5466 (October 2023), 
entitled Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from Japan, South Korea, and 
Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-382 and 731-TA-800, 801, and 803 
(Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 18, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-23401 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Force Energy Corp. (the Company) hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
      year ended November 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                  

Dated: March 13, 2009

/s/ Rahim
RayaniRahim RayaniChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Force Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Force Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
September 27, 1956

No. 60264.

Suit 4837.

#### United States *v.*Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A. and Joseph H. Brown.

C. D. 1648 affirmed April 18, 1956. C. A. D. 617.
No. 66587.

#### Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/10591 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass water mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies, Turner & Company*v. *United States*(47 C.C.P.A. 129, C.A.D. 744), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of America Service GroupInc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.Dated:November 2, 2007       Name: /s/ Michael W. Taylor Title: Senior Vice President &
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 245 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 245

  To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 764.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2000

 Mr. Jenkins submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 764.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 764) to amend the Victims of 
Crime Act of 1984, with respect to certain increases in funds, the 
Clerk of the House shall make the following corrections:
    In section 104(a)(1), in the matter amending section 1402(d)(2) of 
the Victims of Crime Act of 1984--
            (1) strike ``the next'' the first place it appears and 
        insert ``The first''; and
            (2) strike ``the next'' the second place it appears and 
        insert ``the first''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

September 10, 1952

No. 56855.

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States,

petition 6833-R (Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

As revealed in the record, it appeared that the petitioner ordered the boots in question at a time when Canadian and United States dollars were in parity. However, at the time of exportation of the boots from Canada, the Canadian dollar was at a discount in relation to the United States dollar. The customs broker, on instruction from the petitioner, deducted on entry the difference between Canadian and United States dollars from the invoiced value. It developed, however, that the currency of sale as shown on the invoice was United States dollars, rather than Canadian dollars, as had been assumed by the petitioner. Subsequently, the petitioner contacted the shipper to ascertain the reason for invoicing the merchandise in United States dollars, and the interchange of correspondence took approximately 2 months. The merchandise covered by the entries involved was appraised before amended entries were filed by the petitioner. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
     We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of SpinCycle, Inc. of
our report dated March 13, 1998 relating to the financial statements of
SpinCycle, Inc., which appears in such prospectus. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.
    
 
                                          /s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
   
November 20, 1998
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael R. Gorsage, the Chief Executive Officer of Technology SolutionsCompany, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TechnologySolutions Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 12, 2004 By: /s/ MICHAEL R. GORSAGE           Michael R. Gorsage     Chief Executive Officer
No. 55738.

protests 164511-K, etc. (Charleston, S. C.).

#### E. A. Shaw & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in each ease the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protests were therefore overruled.
Before the Second Division,

June 30, 1949

No. 53353.

protests 493326-G, etc. (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser*& *Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
December 30, 1948

No. 52777.

Suit 4583.

#### United States *v.*The J. D. Richardson Company.

C. D. 1053 reversed November 2, 1948. C. A. D. 390.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                     107,733,000
<SECURITIES>                                14,944,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,316,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,084,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           130,620,000
<PP&E>                                      24,531,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,638,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             164,954,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,530,000
<BONDS>                                     80,880,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,250,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,749,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,311,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               164,954,000
<SALES>                                      3,388,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,439,000
<CGS>                                        1,932,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,779,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,489,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,081,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,081,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,081,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>